N-CSR

OMB APPROVAL

OMB Number: 3235-0570

Expires: January 31, 2017

Estimated average burden hours per response: 20.6

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY

Investment Company Act file number 811-22680

Ultimus Managers Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450 Cincinnati, Ohio	45246
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Frank L. Newbauer, Esq.

Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450 Cincinnati, Ohio 45246_

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (513) 587-3400

Date of fiscal year end:	November 30
Date of reporting period:	November 30, 2015

Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS
SELECT EQUITY FUND
(GPSIX)

Annual Report

November 30, 2015

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS	December 4, 2015

Dear Fellow Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund Shareholder:

I am pleased to report on our performance and investment outlook for the fiscal period ended November 30, 2015.

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

From inception on December 30, 2014 through the fiscal period ended November 30, 2015, the Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund (the “Fund”) delivered a return of -3.50% versus a benchmark return of 1.59% for the Russell 3000 Index and 1.95% for the S&P 500 Index. The Fund’s performance was generated amongst what has been a challenging year for equity markets, with issues ranging from bear markets in China and commodities to the first equity market correction in four years.

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS’ PHILOSOPHY

The Fund seeks to outperform its benchmark by targeting investments that include a number of firms whose share prices might be influenced by high insider buying, spun-off divisions, reduced float, and activist shareholders, as well as by focusing on firms with strong valuations or growth potential, such as those companies exhibiting strong free cash flow and/or dividend growth. This is the adviser’s long-term thesis. Additionally, we will rotate into sectors or countries across the globe depending upon the adviser’s perceived opportunities.

INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT

The current environment is mixed heading into the end of 2015. While the U.S. equity markets had strong gains following the correction and sit near all-time highs, there are still sectors that are lagging badly. Oil has contributed to the anxiety in the market as prices have continued to decline, and energy stocks have fallen accordingly.

The key economic data that led to this likelihood was a strong jobs report for October with 271,000 seasonally adjusted jobs gained versus economist’s expectations of 183,000. With the unemployment rate now at 5.0% and inflation around 1.5 to 1.8%, it is likely the Fed’s targets are largely met.

PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION

After outperforming its benchmarks through the first half of the year, the Fund’s large energy exposure that it added in the third quarter negatively affected returns with oil prices declining. The Fund positioned itself too early in these companies, and this has led to the underperformance in the latter half of the year. We perceive that the companies we invested in remain undervalued and will outperform in the long run, but we will constantly assess this perception based on the changing market environments. The majority of the Fund’s energy exposure is with pipeline companies who transport oil throughout the United States. These companies are toll takers who generate steady

1

income streams but are highly levered. We have averaged down our entry price in pipeline companies who are unlikely to face bankruptcy. These companies should benefit once oil bottoms. For now, the Fund maintains its investments in these companies in order to collect dividend yield while the adviser’s longer-term thesis evolves.

On the positive side for the latter portion of the year, the Fund’s investments in the consumer discretionary sector performed well. The adviser believes that Media companies have been assigned unfair valuations due to overstatements in the effects of cord-cutting and lower news subscriptions. The Fund invested in Gray Television and New Media Investment Group, which returned over 30% and 10%, respectively. Besides the two prior investments mentioned, Huntsman, Netease, and Amicus Therapeutics were our biggest winners late in the year.¹ While we are not happy with the Fund’s performance as of late, we believe that our long-term thesis will lead to outperformance for the Fund and that Fund performance will return to the outperformance it experienced over the first half of 2015.

INVESTMENT OUTLOOK

The market is currently near all-time highs and global growth remains slow, but the overall economic picture is positive. The Fed seems to have increasing confidence in the economy for the first time in nearly 7 years. These signs point to a positive 2016, however expectations should be tempered as one of the longest bull markets in history continues.

Themes that should continue into 2016 are a rising U.S. dollar, unstable commodity prices, and increased volatility in the market. The U.S. dollar should continue to rise as the Fed tightens its monetary policy, while the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan continue quantitative easing. Oil prices could trade in a wide range given the breadth of speculation on supply versus demand by market participants. We believe increased volatility from recent years should continue and another correction is possible. We will take all of these themes into consideration and adjust the Fund’s portfolio as we deem appropriate.

While 2015 has been disappointing for the Fund, we believe in our strategy and expect to outperform the benchmark in the long run.

Sincerely,

Stephen Lack

Managing Partner/Chief Investment Officer
Galapagos Partners L.P.

¹ Please refer to the Schedule of Investments section of the Annual Report for a complete listing of the Fund’s holdings and the amount each represents of the Portfolio. Holdings are subject to change without notice.

2

Past performance is not predictive of future performance. Investment results and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. Performance data current to the most recent month end are available by calling 1-800-592-7722.

An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. The Fund’s prospectus contains this and other important information. To obtain a copy of the Fund’s prospectus, please call 1-800-592-7722 and a copy will be sent to you free of charge. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest. The Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund is distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC.

The Letter to Shareholders seeks to describe some of the Adviser’s current opinions and views of the financial markets. Although the Adviser believes it has a reasonable basis for any opinions or views expressed, actual results may differ, sometimes significantly so, from those expected or expressed. The securities held by the Fund that are discussed in the Letter to Shareholders were held during the period covered by this Report. They do not comprise the entire investment portfolio of the Fund, may be sold at any time and may no longer be held by the Fund. The opinions of the Adviser with respect to those securities may change at any time.

Statements in the Letter to Shareholders that reflect projections or expectations for future financial or economic performance of the Fund and the market in general and statements of the Fund’s plans and objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that actual results or events will not differ materially from those projected, estimated, assumed, or anticipated in any such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could result in such differences, in addition to factors noted with such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, general economic conditions, such as inflation, recession, and interest rates. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

3

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Comparison of the Change in Value of a $10,000 Investment

in Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund vs. the Russell 3000 Index

and the S&P 500 Index

Total Returns (for period ended November 30, 2015)
	Since Inception(b)
Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund(a)	(3.50%)
Russell 3000 Index	1.59%
S&P 500 Index	1.95%

^(a) The Fund’s total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of shares.

^(b) The Fund commenced operations on December 30, 2014.

4

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
PORTFOLIO INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Sector Diversification (% of Net Assets)

Top 10 Equity Holdings

Security Description	% of Net Assets
New Media Investment Group, Inc.	7.2%
Alerian MLP ETF	5.8%
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.	5.0%
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.	4.7%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.	4.3%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.	4.3%
Cellectis S.A. - ADR	4.1%
PowerShares QQQ TrustSM, Series 1	3.9%
Gray Television, Inc.	3.2%
NetEase, Inc. - ADR	2.8%

5

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2015

COMMON STOCKS — 80.6%	Shares		Value
Consumer Discretionary — 21.3%
Automobiles — 2.0%
Thor Industries, Inc.		1,461	$	84,621
Household Durables — 2.2%
Harman International Industries, Inc.		875		90,265
Media — 12.8%
Gray Television, Inc. (a)		7,882		132,023
New Media Investment Group, Inc.		16,525		300,920
Walt Disney Company (The)		880		99,854
				532,797
Specialty Retail — 4.3%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.		2,312		177,099
Energy — 17.0%
Energy Equipment & Services — 0.2%
SAExploration Holdings, Inc. (a)		4,006		9,534
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 16.8%
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.		10,320		195,461
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.		8,185		207,817
EOG Resources, Inc.		896		74,753
Kinder Morgan, Inc.		7,500		176,775
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. - Class A		3,600		44,136
				698,942
Financials — 4.3%
Banks — 2.0%
Bank of the Ozarks, Inc.		1,520		82,505
Insurance — 2.3%
MetLife, Inc.		1,863		95,181
Health Care — 11.0%
Biotechnology — 6.7%
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (a)		9,911		106,345
Cellectis S.A. - ADR (a)		5,141		170,116
				276,461
Health Care Providers & Services — 1.9%
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (a)		2,654		78,293

6

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

COMMON STOCKS — 80.6% (Continued)	Shares		Value
Health Care — 11.0% (Continued)
Pharmaceuticals — 2.4%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (a)		687	$	100,707
Industrials — 14.3%
Aerospace & Defense — 5.0%
Boeing Company (The)		717		104,288
Raytheon Company		850		105,425
				209,713
Air Freight & Logistics — 2.7%
Park-Ohio Holdings Corporation		2,641		110,922
Airlines — 1.9%
JetBlue Airways Corporation (a)		3,213		79,490
Commercial Services & Supplies — 1.5%
West Corporation		2,456		62,628
Construction & Engineering — 2.7%
Dycom Industries, Inc. (a)		1,300		113,594
Marine — 0.5%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (a)		6,700		20,100
Information Technology — 11.7%
Communications Equipment — 2.2%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (a)		490		91,797
Internet Software & Services — 5.3%
Alphabet, Inc. - Class A (a)		135		102,985
NetEase, Inc. - ADR		700		116,662
				219,647
Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment — 4.2%
Avago Technologies Ltd.		725		94,576
Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (a)		5,742		81,709
				176,285
Materials — 1.0%
Metals & Mining — 1.0%
Hi-Crush Partners, L.P.		5,500		42,625
Total Common Stocks (Cost $3,221,318)			$	3,353,206

7

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS — 13.9%	Shares		Value
Energy — 5.8%
Alerian MLP ETF		19,715	$	241,706
Financials — 2.0%
SPDR® S&P® Regional Banking ETF		1,783		81,394
Index — 3.9%
PowerShares QQQ TrustSM, Series 1		1,436		163,733
International — 2.2%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (a)		1,240		89,937
Total Exchange-Traded Funds (Cost $567,996)			$	576,770

MONEY MARKET FUNDS — 3.7%	Shares		Value
Invesco Short-Term Investments Trust - Treasury Portfolio - Institutional Shares, 0.02% (b) (Cost $153,981)		153,981	$	153,981
Total Investments at Value — 98.2% (Cost $3,943,295)			$	4,083,957
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 1.8%				73,193
Net Assets — 100.0%			$	4,157,150

ADR - American Depositary Receipt

^(a) Non-income producing security.

^(b) The rate shown is the 7-day effective yield as of November 30, 2015.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

8

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
November 30, 2015

ASSETS
Investments in securities:
At acquisition cost	$	3,943,295
At value (Note 2)	$	4,083,957
Dividends receivable		1,744
Receivable for investment securities sold		71,739
Receivable from Adviser (Note 4)		4,382
Other assets		5,348
Total assets		4,167,170
LIABILITIES
Payable to administrator (Note 4)		6,030
Other accrued expenses		3,990
Total liabilities		10,020
NET ASSETS	$	4,157,150
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF:
Paid-in capital	$	4,486,733
Undistributed net investment income		12,819
Accumulated net realized losses from security transactions		(483,064	)
Net unrealized appreciation on investments		140,662
NET ASSETS	$	4,157,150
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value)		430,650
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share (Note 2)	$	9.65

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

9

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Period Ended November 30, 2015 ^(a)

INVESTMENT INCOME
Dividend income (Net of foreign tax of $132)	$	41,760
EXPENSES
Investment advisory fees (Note 4)		27,696
Fund accounting fees (Note 4)		22,214
Administration fees (Note 4)		22,000
Professional fees		16,075
Compliance fees and expenses (Note 4)		12,176
Transfer agent fees (Note 4)		11,000
Trustees' fees and expenses (Note 4)		9,889
Custody and bank service fees		8,693
Registration and filing fees		5,933
Postage and supplies		3,968
Printing of shareholder reports		3,728
Insurance expense		2,999
Other expenses		4,841
Total expenses		151,212
Less fee reductions and expense reimbursements by the Adviser (Note 4)		(111,977	)
Less fee waivers by the administrator (Note 4)		(6,000	)
Net expenses		33,235
NET INVESTMENT INCOME		8,525
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS
Net realized losses from security transactions		(484,299	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		140,662
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED LOSSES ON INVESTMENTS		(343,637	)
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS	$	(335,112	)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (December 30, 2014) through Novermber 30, 2015.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

10

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Period Ended November 30, 2015 (a)
FROM OPERATIONS
Net investment income	$	8,525
Net realized losses from security transactions		(484,299	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		140,662
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations		(335,112	)
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Proceeds from shares sold		5,036,117
Payments for shares redeemed		(543,855	)
Net increase in net assets resulting from capital share transactions		4,492,262
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS		4,157,150
NET ASSETS
Beginning of period		—
End of period	$	4,157,150
UNDISTRIBUTED NET INVESTMENT INCOME	$	12,819
CAPITAL SHARE ACTIVITY
Shares sold		488,198
Shares redeemed		(57,548	)
Net increase in shares outstanding		430,650
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		—
Shares outstanding at end of period		430,650

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (December 30, 2014) through November 30, 2015.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

11

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period
	Period Ended November 30, 2015 (a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income		0.02
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments		(0.37	)
Total from investment operations		(0.35	)
Net asset value at end of period	$	9.65
Total return (b)		(3.50%	)(c)
Net assets at end of period (000's)	$	4,157
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets (e)		6.82	%(d)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (e) (f)		1.50	%(d)
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (e) (f) (g)		0.38	%(d)
Portfolio turnover rate		1,244	%(c)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (December 30, 2014) through November 30, 2015.

^(b) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the period covered. The return shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of Fund shares. The total return would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and/or reimbursed expenses.

^(c) Not annualized.

^(d) Annualized.

^(e) Ratios do not reflect the Fund’s proportionate share of expenses of the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests.

^(f) Ratio was determined after advisory fee reductions and/or expense reimbursements (Note 4).

^(g) Recognition of net investment income by the Fund is affected by the timing of the declaration of dividends by the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

12

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
November 30, 2015

1. Organization

Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end investment company established as an Ohio business trust under a Declaration of Trust dated February 28, 2012. Other series of the Trust are not incorporated in this report. The Fund commenced operations on December 30, 2014.

The investment objective of the Fund is capital appreciation.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of the Fund’s significant accounting policies used in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). As an investment company, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update 2013-08, the Fund follows accounting and reporting guidance under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies.”

Securities valuation – The Fund values its portfolio securities at market value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) (normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on each business day the NYSE is open for business. The Fund values its listed securities on the basis of the security’s last sale price on the primary exchange, if available, otherwise at the exchange’s most recently quoted bid price. NASDAQ-listed securities are valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. In the event that market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable due to market or other events, the Fund values its securities and other assets at fair value in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”). Under these procedures, the securities will be classified as Level 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy (see below), depending on the inputs used. Unavailable or unreliable market quotes may be due to the following factors: a substantial bid-ask spread; infrequent sales resulting in stale prices; insufficient trading volume; small trade sizes; a temporary lapse in any reliable pricing source; and actions of the securities or futures markets, such as the suspension or limitation of trading. As a result, the prices of securities used to calculate the Fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities.

GAAP establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

● Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

13

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

● Level 2 – other significant observable inputs

● Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs

The inputs or methods used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of November 30, 2015:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Investments in Securities:
Common Stocks	$	3,353,206	$	—	$	—	$	3,353,206
Exchange-Traded Funds		576,770		—		—		576,770
Money Market Funds		153,981		—		—		153,981
Total	$	4,083,957	$	—	$	—	$	4,083,957

Refer to the Fund’s Schedule of Investments for a listing of the common stocks by industry type. As of November 30, 2015, the Fund did not have any transfers into and out of any Level. In addition, the Fund did not have derivative instruments or any assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of November 30, 2015. It is the Fund’s policy to recognize transfers into and out of any Level at the end of the reporting period.

Share valuation – The net asset value per share of the Fund is calculated daily by dividing the total value of the Fund’s assets, less liabilities, by the number of shares outstanding. The offering price and redemption price per share of the Fund is equal to the net asset value per share.

Investment income – Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is accrued as earned.

Security transactions – Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined on a specific identification basis.

Common expenses – Common expenses of the Trust are allocated among the Fund and the other series of the Trust based on the relative net assets of each series or the nature of the services performed and the relative applicability to each series.

Distributions to shareholders – The Fund will distribute to shareholders any net investment income and net realized capital gains at least once each year. The amount of such dividends and distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax

14

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

regulations, which may differ from GAAP. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. There were no distributions paid to shareholders during the period ended November 30, 2015.

Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Federal income tax – The Fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Qualification generally will relieve the Fund of liability for federal income taxes to the extent 100% of its net investment income and net realized capital gains are distributed in accordance with the Code. Accordingly, no provision for income tax has been made.

In order to avoid imposition of the excise tax applicable to regulated investment companies, it is also the Fund’s intention to declare as dividends in each calendar year at least 98% of its net investment income (earned during the calendar year) and 98.2% of its net realized capital gains (earned during the twelve months ended October 31) plus undistributed amounts from prior years.

The following information is computed on a tax basis for each item as of November 30, 2015:

Tax cost of portfolio investments	$	3,975,090
Gross unrealized appreciation	$	255,459
Gross unrealized depreciation		(146,592	)
Net unrealized appreciation on investments		108,867
Capital loss carryforward		(438,450	)
Accumulated deficit	$	(329,583	)

The difference between the federal income tax cost of portfolio investments and the financial statement cost of portfolio investments is due to certain timing differences in the recognition of capital gains or losses under income tax regulations and GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are temporary in nature and are primarily due to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the tax treatment of income and capital gains on publicly-traded partnerships held by the Fund.

As of November 30, 2015, the Fund has a short-term capital loss carryforward of $438,450 for federal income tax purposes. This capital loss carryforward, which does not expire, may be utilized in future years to offset net realized capital gains, if any, prior to distributing such gains to shareholders.

15

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

For the period ended November 30, 2015, the following reclassification was made on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a result of permanent differences in the recognition of income under income tax regulations and GAAP:

Paid-in capital	$	(5,529	)
Undistributed net investment income	$	4,294
Accumulated net realized losses from security transactions	$	1,235

These differences are primarily due to the tax treatment of income on publicly-traded partnerships held by the Fund. This reclassification, the result of permanent differences between financial statement and income tax reporting requirements, has no effect on the Fund’s net assets or net asset value per share.

The Fund recognizes the tax benefits or expenses of uncertain tax positions only when the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has reviewed the Fund’s tax positions for the current tax period and has concluded that no provision for unrecognized tax benefits or expenses is required in these financial statements. The Fund identifies its major tax jurisdiction as U.S. Federal.

3. Investment Transactions

During the period ended November 30, 2015, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than short-term investments, were $30,450,632 and $26,177,019, respectively.

4. Transactions with Related Parties

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

The Fund’s investments are managed by Galapagos Partners, L.P. (the “Adviser”) pursuant to the terms of an Investment Advisory Agreement. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Fund pays the Adviser an advisory fee, computed and accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 1.25% of its average daily net assets.

Pursuant to an Expense Limitation Agreement (“ELA”) between the Fund and the Adviser, the Adviser has agreed, until March 31, 2017, to reduce investment advisory fees and reimburse other operating expenses to limit total annual operating expenses of the Fund (exclusive of brokerage costs, taxes, interest, acquired fund fees and expenses, extraordinary expenses such as litigation and merger or reorganization costs, and other expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business) to an amount not exceeding 1.50% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Accordingly, during the period ended November 30, 2015, the Adviser did not collect any of its advisory fees and, in addition, reimbursed other operating expenses totaling $84,281.

16

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Under the terms of the ELA, investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements by the Adviser are subject to recoupment by the Adviser for a period of three years after such fees and expenses were incurred, provided the recoupments do not cause total annual operating expenses of the Fund to exceed 1.50% of the average daily net assets. As of November 30, 2015, the Adviser may seek recoupment of investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements totaling $111,977 no later than November 30, 2018.

The principal executive officer of the Fund is also an officer of the Adviser.

OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS

Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (“Ultimus”) provides fund administration, fund accounting, compliance and transfer agency services to the Fund. The Fund pays Ultimus fees in accordance with the agreements for such services. In addition, the Fund pays out-of-pocket expenses including but not limited to postage, supplies and costs of pricing the Fund’s portfolio securities. During the period ended November 30, 2015, Ultimus voluntarily waived fees in the amount of $6,000.

Under the terms of a Distribution Agreement with the Trust, Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (the “Distributor”) serves as principal underwriter to the Fund. The Distributor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ultimus. The Distributor is compensated by the Adviser (not the Fund) for acting as principal underwriter.

Certain officers and a Trustee of the Trust are also officers of Ultimus and the Distributor.

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION

Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (“Independent Trustee”) receives from the Fund a fee of $500 for each Board meeting attended plus reimbursement of travel and other meeting-related expenses. Each Independent Trustee also receives a $500 annual retainer from the Fund. Trustees affiliated with the Adviser or Ultimus are not compensated by the Fund for their services.

17

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF FUND SHARES

As of November 30, 2015, the following shareholders owned of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the Fund:

Name of Record Owner	% Ownership
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc	70%
Lack Holdings, Inc.	11%
Clifford B. Sondock	5%

A beneficial owner of 25% or more of the Fund’s outstanding shares may be considered a controlling person. That shareholder’s vote could have a more significant effect on matters presented at a shareholder’s meeting.

5. Contingencies and Commitments

The Fund indemnifies the Trust’s officers and Trustees for certain liabilities that might arise from their performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.

6. Subsequent Events

The Fund is required to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed as of the date of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, the Fund is required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of these financial statements and has noted no such events.

18

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trustees of Ultimus Managers Trust
and the Shareholders of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund, a series of shares of beneficial interest in Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Fund”), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2015, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the period December 30, 2014 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2015. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2015 by correspondence with the custodian. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund as of November 30, 2015, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the period December 30, 2014 through November 30, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

	BBD,LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania January 26, 2016

19

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)

We believe it is important for you to understand the impact of costs on your investment. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other operating expenses. The following examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

A mutual fund’s ongoing costs are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The expenses in the table below are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the most recent period (June 1, 2015) and held until the end of the period (November 30, 2015).

The table below illustrates the Fund’s ongoing costs in two ways:

Actual fund return – This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the fourth column shows the dollar amount of operating expenses that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.

To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for the Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”

Hypothetical 5% return – This section is intended to help you compare the Fund’s ongoing costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the Fund had an annual return of 5% before expenses during the period shown, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case, because the return used is not the Fund’s actual return, the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Comission (“SEC”) requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess the Fund’s ongoing costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.

Note that expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only. The Fund does not charge transaction fees, such as purchase or redemption fees, nor does it carry a “sales load.”

The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.

20

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
ABOUT YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited) (Continued)

More information about the Fund’s expenses can be found in this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.

	Beginning Account Value June 1, 2015	Ending Account Value November 30, 2015	Net Expense Ratio (a)	Expenses Paid During Period (b)
Based on Actual Fund Return	$1,000.00	$911.20	1.50%	$7.19
Based on Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$1,017.55	1.50%	$7.59

^(a) Annualized, based on the Fund’s most recent one-half year expenses.

^(b) Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited)

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free 1-800-592-7722, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free 1-800-592-7722, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

The Trust files a complete listing of portfolio holdings for the Fund with the SEC as of the end of the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. These filings are available upon request by calling 1-800-592-7722. Furthermore, you may obtain a copy of the filings on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Trust’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC, and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

21

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Unaudited)

The Board has overall responsibility for management of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees serve during the lifetime of the Trust and until its termination, or until death, resignation, retirement, or removal. The Trustees, in turn, elect the officers of the Fund to actively supervise its day-to-day operations. The officers have been elected for an annual term. Unless otherwise noted, each Trustee’s and officer’s address is 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450, Cincinnati, Ohio 45246. The following are the Trustees and executive officers of the Fund as of January 26, 2016:

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Trust Overseen by Trustee	Directorships of Public Companies Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Interested Trustees:
Robert G. Dorsey* Year of Birth: 1957	Since February 2012	Trustee (February 2012 to present) President (June 2012 to October 2013)	Managing Director of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC and Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (1999 to present)	21	n/a
Independent Trustees:
Janine L. Cohen Year of Birth: 1952	Since January 2016	Trustee	Retired since 2013;Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2013 and Chief Compliance Officer from 2008 to 2013 at AER Advisors, Inc.	21	n/a
John C. Davis Year of Birth: 1952	Since June 2012	Chairman (July 2014 to present) Trustee (June 2012 to present)	Consultant since May 2011; Retired partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (1974 to 2010)	21	n/a
David M. Deptula Year of Birth: 1958	Since June 2012	Trustee	Vice President of Legal and Special Projects at Dayton Freight Lines, Inc. since 2016; Vice President of Tax Treasury at Standard Register, Inc. (formerly The Standard Register Company) from 2011 to 2016	21	n/a

22

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Unaudited) (Continued)

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Trust Overseen by Trustee	Directorships of Public Companies Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees: (Continued)
John J. Discepoli Year of Birth: 1963	Since June 2012	Trustee	Owner of Discepoli Financial Planning, LLC (personal financial planning company) since 2004	21	n/a

* Mr. Dorsey is considered an “interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, because of his relationship with the Trust’s administrator, transfer agent and distributor. Mr. Dorsey was President of the Trust from June 2012 to October 2013.

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Executive Officers:
Stephen P. Lack 55 Waugh Drive Suite 1130 Houston, TX 77077 Year of Birth: 1957	Since October 2014	Principal Executive Officer of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund	Founder, President and Chief Investment Officer of Galapagos Partners, L.P. (2007 to present)
David R. Carson Year of Birth: 1958	Since April 2013	President (October 2013 to present) Vice President (April 2013 to October 2013)	Vice President and Director of Client Strategies of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2013 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, FSI LBAR Fund (2013 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, The Huntington Funds (2005 to 2013), The Flex-Funds (2006 to 2011), Meeder Financial (2007 to 2011), Huntington Strategy Shares (2012 to 2013), and Huntington Asset Advisors (2013); Vice President, Huntington National Bank (2001 to 2013)
Jennifer L. Leamer Year of Birth: 1976	Since April 2014	Treasurer (October 2014 to present) Assistant Treasurer (April 2014 to October 2014)	Vice President, Mutual Fund Controller of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2014 to present); Business Analyst of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2007 to 2014)

23

GALAPAGOS PARTNERS SELECT EQUITY FUND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Unaudited) (Continued)

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Executive Officers: (Continued)
Bo J. Howell Year of Birth: 1981	Since October 2014	Secretary (April 2015 to present) Assistant Secretary (October 2014 to April 2015)	Vice President, Director of Fund Administration for Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2014 to present); Counsel – Securities and Mutual Funds for Western & Southern Financial Group (2012 to 2014); U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Senior Counsel (2009 to 2012)
Charles C. Black Year of Birth: 1979	Since April 2015	Chief Compliance Officer (January 2016 to present) Assistant Chief Compliance Officer (April 2015 to January 2016)	Senior Compliance Officer of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2015 to present); Senior Compliance Manager for Touchstone Mutual Funds (2013 to 2015); Senior Compliance Manager for Fund Evaluation Group (2011 to 2013); Regulatory Administration Specialist for JPMorgan Chase Bank (2006 to 2011)

Additional information about members of the Board and executive officers is available in the Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”). To obtain a free copy of the SAI, please call 1-800-592-7722.

24

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND

Institutional Class (LYRIX)

Investor Class (LYRBX)

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND

Institutional Class (LYRHX)

Investor Class (LYRDX)

Annual Report

November 30, 2015

LYRICAL FUNDS
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS December 9, 2015

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

Enclosed is the annual report to shareholders of the Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund (the “Value Fund”) and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund (the “Hedged Value Fund”) (collectively, the “Funds”). On behalf of the Funds and their investment adviser, Lyrical Asset Management LP, I would like to thank you for your investment.

Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund

Since its launch on February 4, 2013 through November 30, 2015, the Value Fund – Institutional Class has produced a cumulative total return of +61.40%, compared to the +47.63% cumulative total return for the S&P 500 Index (the “S&P 500”). For the twelve months ended November 30, 2015, the Value Fund – Institutional Class produced a total return of -1.91% compared to the total return for the S&P 500 of 2.75%. The biggest winners for the fiscal year were Avago Technologies Ltd. (+41%), NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. (+32%), and Assurant, Inc. (+29%). The biggest losers were National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (-42%), Avis Budget Group, Inc. (-38%) and Western Digital Corporation (-38%). While we have sold our NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. holdings we maintain our positions in these other largest winners and detractors.

In analyzing the Fund’s portfolio’s performance attribution, we find it helpful to examine both the investment success rate and any skew in the distribution of returns. Our success rate has been high over the life of the Value Fund, as 80% of the Fund’s investments posted gains, and 64% outperformed the S&P 500. Skew has also been a positive factor, as the Fund’s outperformers have outperformed by 47%, while our underperformers have underperformed by 34%. For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015, our underperformance is explained by a lower success rate, as only 49% of the Fund’s investments posted gains, and only 46% outperformed the S&P 500. Skew has been a negative factor as the Fund’s outperformers have outperformed by 15%, while our underperformers have underperformed by 19%.

During the life of the Value Fund we have sold twelve positions, as three companies announced they were being acquired, eight approached our estimates of fair value, and for one we lost conviction in our thesis. For each sale we added a new position from our pipeline of opportunities. We are still finding attractive stock opportunities to add to the portfolio, even as some of our existing positions begin to approach our estimates of fair value.

As of November 30, 2015, the valuation of our portfolio is 13.1x next twelve months consensus earnings. The S&P 500 has a valuation of 16.1x on this same basis, a premium of 22%.

1

Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund

In July 2014, we launched the Hedged Value Fund as a liquid alternatives product that employs the same long portfolio as the Value Fund. Sector ETF hedges are used on the short side to create a portfolio that aims to maintain net long exposures of 50%. This provides a hedged option for those wishing exposure to the long portfolio but unwilling to accept unhedged equity market exposure.

Since its launch on July 14, 2014 through November 30, 2015, the Hedged Value Fund – Institutional Class has produced a cumulative total return of -5.49%, compared to the +8.30% cumulative total return for the S&P 500. For the twelve months ended November 30, 2015, the Hedged Value Fund – Institutional Class produced a total return of -3.66% compared to the total return for the S&P 500 of 2.75%. In rising equity markets one should expect Hedged Value Fund’s performance to lag that of the Value Fund, as it did for both the above periods, as our hedges detract from total return.

Lyrical Asset Management’s Investment Philosophy and Portfolio Construction

As there have been a significant number of new investors since our previous year-end letter to the Funds’ shareholders, we’d like to briefly outline our investment philosophy and portfolio construction approach.

We believe our strategy and approach to investing differentiates us from other investment managers, even those that share a value approach to investing. We are deep value investors and by this we mean that we look to invest in companies that trade significantly below intrinsic value. This separates us from other value managers who focus on relative value or core value approaches and whose portfolio characteristics have higher Price/Earnings, Price/Book and Price/Cash Flow multiples. We assess valuation based on current price relative to long-term normalized earnings, which contrasts us to those that rely on Price/Book or dividend yield. We only invest in what we consider to be quality businesses that we believe should earn good returns on invested capital, and avoid volatile businesses and companies with excessive leverage. Other value investors may consider owning any business regardless of quality if they believe the price is low enough. Lastly, we only invest in businesses we can understand, and avoid those that are excessively complex or require specialized technical knowledge, even though they may appear cheap from a high-level perspective.

We construct our portfolio purely bottom up and without regard to what is or is not contained in a benchmark. We are concerned with concentration risk, and have strict limits on how much capital can be invested in any one position or any one industry. Our long portfolio is constructed to be balanced and diversified across approximately 33 positions, giving us exposure to many different types of companies and situations without sacrificing our strict investment standards.

Thank you for your continued trust and interest in Lyrical Asset Management.

Sincerely,

Andrew Wellington
Portfolio Manager

2

Past performance is not predictive of future performance. Investment results and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. Performance data current to the most recent month end are available by calling 1-888-884-8099.

An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Funds carefully before investing. The Funds’ prospectus contains this and other important information. To obtain a copy of the Funds’ prospectus please call 1-888-884-8099 and a copy will be sent to you free of charge. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest. The Funds are distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC.

The Letter to Shareholders seeks to describe some of the Adviser’s current opinions and views of the financial markets. Although the Adviser believes it has a reasonable basis for any opinions or views expressed, actual results may differ, sometimes significantly so, from those expected or expressed.

The securities discussed in this letter to shareholders do not comprise the entire investment portfolio of a Fund, may be sold at any time, and may no longer be held by the Fund. For a complete list of securities held by each Fund as of November 30, 2015, please see the Schedule of Investments section of the Annual Report.

Statements in the Letter to Shareholders that reflect projections or expectations for future financial or economic performance of the Funds and the market in general and statements of the Funds’ plans and objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that actual results or events will not differ materially from those projected, estimated, assumed, or anticipated in any such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could result in such differences, in addition to factors noted with such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, general economic conditions, such as inflation, recession, and interest rates. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

3

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Unaudited)

Comparison of the Change in Value of a $100,000 Investment in
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Institutional Class^(a) versus
the S&P 500^® Index

Average Annual Total Returns(b) (for the periods ended November 30, 2015)
	1 Year	Since Inception(c)
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Institutional Class	(1.91%)	18.51%
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Investor Class	(2.19%)	4.68%
S&P 500® Index(d)	2.75%	14.82%(e)

^(a) The line graph above represents performance of the Institutional Class only, which will vary from the performance of the Investor Class based on the difference in fees paid by shareholders in the different classes.

^(b) The Fund’s total returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.

^(c) Commencement of operations for Institutional Class shares was February 4, 2013. Commencement of operations for Investor Class shares was February 24, 2014.

^(d) The S&P 500^® Index is a market capitalization weighted index of 500 large companies that is widely used as a barometer of U.S. stock market performance. The index is unmanaged and shown for illustration purposes only. An investor cannot invest in an index and its returns are not indicative of the performance of any specific investment.

^(e) Represents the period from February 4, 2013 (date of commencement of operations of Institutional Class shares) through November 30, 2015.

4

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Unaudited)

Comparison of the Change in Value of a $100,000 Investment in
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Institutional Class^(a) versus
the S&P 500^® Index

Average Annual Total Returns(b) (for the periods ended November 30, 2015)
	1 Year	Since Inception(c)
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Institutional Class	(3.66%)	(4.01%)
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Investor Class	(3.87%)	(4.23%)
S&P 500® Index(d)	2.75%	5.94%

^(a) The line graph above represents performance of the Institutional Class only, which will vary from the performance of the Investor Class based on the difference in fees paid by shareholders in the different classes.

^(b) The Fund’s total returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.

^(c) Commencement of operations for Institutional Class and Investor Class shares was July 14, 2014.

^(d) The S&P 500^® Index is a market capitalization weighted index of 500 large companies that is widely used as a barometer of U.S. stock market performance. The index is unmanaged and shown for illustration purposes only. An investor cannot invest in an index and its returns are not indicative of the performance of any specific investment.

5

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
PORTFOLIO INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund vs S&P 500^® Index
Sector Diversification

Top Ten Equity Holdings

Security Description	% of Net Assets
Avago Technologies Ltd.	6.4%
Raytheon Company	5.2%
Aetna, Inc.	4.9%
Comcast Corporation - Class A	4.6%
Anthem, Inc.	4.4%
Aflac, Inc.	4.4%
TE Connectivity Ltd.	4.3%
Liberty Interactive Corporation - Series A	3.9%
Johnson Controls, Inc.	3.8%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.	3.8%

6

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
PORTFOLIO INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund vs S&P 500^® Index
Sector Diversification

* The percentages above for Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund represent the net percentages for the Fund and are computed by taking the net dollar exposure, including short positions, and dividing by the net assets of the Fund.

Top Ten Long Positions

Security Description	% of Net Assets
Avago Technologies Ltd.	6.8%
Raytheon Company	5.3%
Aetna, Inc.	5.0%
Comcast Corporation - Class A	4.6%
Anthem, Inc.	4.5%
TE Connectivity Ltd.	4.4%
Aflac, Inc.	4.4%
Liberty Interactive Corporation - Series A	3.9%
Johnson Controls, Inc.	3.8%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.	3.8%

7

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2015

COMMON STOCKS — 98.2%	Shares		Value
Consumer Discretionary — 16.4%
Auto Components — 7.9%
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)		562,903	$	19,634,057
Johnson Controls, Inc.		545,158		25,077,268
Tenneco, Inc. (a)		130,195		7,014,906
				51,726,231
Internet & Catalog Retail — 3.9%
Liberty Interactive Corporation - Series A (a)		951,477		25,195,111
Media — 4.6%
Comcast Corporation - Class A		487,874		29,692,012
Energy — 8.7%
Energy Equipment & Services — 2.2%
National Oilwell Varco, Inc.		391,373		14,613,868
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 6.5%
EOG Resources, Inc.		261,482		21,815,443
Suncor Energy, Inc.		745,899		20,586,812
				42,402,255
Financials — 14.5%
Capital Markets — 3.8%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.		217,927		24,614,854
Insurance — 10.7%
Aflac, Inc.		435,819		28,432,832
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc.		166,757		10,423,980
Assurant, Inc.		153,354		13,114,834
Willis Group Holdings plc		386,850		17,779,626
				69,751,272
Health Care — 9.3%
Health Care Providers & Services — 9.3%
Aetna, Inc.		309,305		31,781,089
Anthem, Inc.		222,089		28,955,964
				60,737,053
Industrials — 17.1%
Aerospace & Defense — 5.2%
Raytheon Company		275,331		34,149,304
Construction & Engineering — 1.3%
AECOM (a)		255,821		8,142,783

8

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

COMMON STOCKS — 98.2% (Continued)	Shares		Value
Industrials — 17.1% (Continued)
Electrical Equipment — 3.3%
Eaton Corporation plc		370,895	$	21,571,253
Road & Rail — 3.6%
Avis Budget Group, Inc. (a)		228,811		8,555,244
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (a)		943,098		14,957,534
				23,512,778
Trading Companies & Distributors — 3.7%
AerCap Holdings N.V. (a)		457,637		20,795,025
MRC Global, Inc. (a)		221,828		3,280,836
				24,075,861
Information Technology — 27.5%
Communications Equipment — 1.5%
ARRIS Group, Inc. (a)		311,879		9,534,141
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 8.0%
Corning, Inc.		1,252,054		23,450,971
TE Connectivity Ltd.		422,378		28,337,340
				51,788,311
IT Services — 3.3%
Western Union Company (The)		1,155,695		21,796,408
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 6.4%
Avago Technologies Ltd.		320,984		41,872,363
Software — 3.5%
Symantec Corporation		1,156,148		22,637,378
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals — 4.8%
Lexmark International, Inc. - Class A		131,259		4,507,434
NCR Corporation (a)		358,202		9,710,856
Western Digital Corporation		277,038		17,289,942
				31,508,232
Materials — 4.7%
Chemicals — 3.6%
Celanese Corporation - Series A		336,649		23,817,917
Containers & Packaging — 1.1%
Owens-Illinois, Inc. (a)		357,242		6,891,198
Total Common Stocks (Cost $625,105,710)			$	640,030,583

9

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

MONEY MARKET FUNDS — 1.8%	Shares		Value
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Portfolio - Class I, 0.12% (b) (Cost $11,642,472)		11,642,472	$	11,642,472
Total Investments at Value — 100.0% (Cost $636,748,182)			$	651,673,055
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 0.0% (c)				283,785
Net Assets — 100.0%			$	651,956,840

^(a) Non-income producing security.

^(b) The rate shown is the 7-day effective yield as of November 30, 2015.

^(c) Percentage rounds to less than 0.1%.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

10

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2015

COMMON STOCKS — 99.0%	Shares		Value
Consumer Discretionary — 16.4%
Auto Components — 7.9%
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The) (a)		1,219	$	42,519
Johnson Controls, Inc. (a)		1,160		53,360
Tenneco, Inc. (b)		269		14,494
				110,373
Internet & Catalog Retail — 3.9%
Liberty Interactive Corporation - Series A (a) (b)		2,027		53,675
Media — 4.6%
Comcast Corporation - Class A (a)		1,055		64,207
Energy — 8.3%
Energy Equipment & Services — 2.1%
National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (a)		779		29,088
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 6.2%
EOG Resources, Inc. (a)		540		45,052
Suncor Energy, Inc. (a)		1,528		42,173
				87,225
Financials — 14.6%
Capital Markets — 3.8%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (a)		472		53,312
Insurance — 10.8%
Aflac, Inc. (a)		935		61,000
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (a)		363		22,691
Assurant, Inc. (a)		335		28,649
Willis Group Holdings plc (a)		843		38,744
				151,084
Health Care — 9.5%
Health Care Providers & Services — 9.5%
Aetna, Inc. (a)		671		68,945
Anthem, Inc. (a)		483		62,974
				131,919
Industrials — 17.3%
Aerospace & Defense — 5.3%
Raytheon Company (a)		599		74,294
Construction & Engineering — 1.2%
AECOM (a) (b)		537		17,093

11

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

COMMON STOCKS — 99.0% (Continued)	Shares		Value
Industrials — 17.3% (Continued)
Electrical Equipment — 3.3%
Eaton Corporation plc (a)		786	$	45,714
Road & Rail — 3.7%
Avis Budget Group, Inc. (a) (b)		503		18,807
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (a) (b)		2,050		32,513
				51,320
Trading Companies & Distributors — 3.8%
AerCap Holdings N.V. (a) (b)		1,000		45,440
MRC Global, Inc. (a) (b)		483		7,143
				52,583
Information Technology — 28.1%
Communications Equipment — 1.5%
ARRIS Group, Inc. (b)		665		20,329
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 8.0%
Corning, Inc. (a)		2,710		50,758
TE Connectivity Ltd. (a)		919		61,656
				112,414
IT Services — 3.4%
Western Union Company (The) (a)		2,529		47,697
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 6.8%
Avago Technologies Ltd. (a)		725		94,576
Software — 3.5%
Symantec Corporation (a)		2,465		48,265
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals — 4.9%
Lexmark International, Inc. - Class A (a)		294		10,096
NCR Corporation (b)		799		21,661
Western Digital Corporation (a)		598		37,321
				69,078
Materials — 4.8%
Chemicals — 3.7%
Celanese Corporation - Series A (a)		735		52,002
Containers & Packaging — 1.1%
Owens-Illinois, Inc. (a) (b)		780		15,046
Total Common Stocks (Cost $1,441,612)			$	1,381,294

12

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

MONEY MARKET FUNDS — 3.6%	Shares		Value
Invesco Liquid Assets Portfolio (The) - Institutional Shares, 0.17%(c) (Cost $50,872)		50,872	$	50,872
Total Investments at Value — 102.6% (Cost $1,492,484)			$	1,432,166
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets(d) — (2.6%)				(36,736	)
Net Assets — 100.0%			$	1,395,430

^(a) All or a portion of the shares have been committed as collateral for open short positions (Note 2).

^(b) Non-income producing security.

^(c) The rate shown is the 7-day effective yield as of November 30, 2015.

^(d) Includes cash held as margin deposits for open short positions.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

13

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
SCHEDULE OF SECURITIES SOLD SHORT
November 30, 2015

EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS — 51.7%	Shares		Value
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		1,145	$	92,493
Energy Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		875		59,517
Financial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		6,042		148,392
Health Care Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		1,006		71,537
Industrial Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		3,212		175,825
Materials Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		532		24,328
Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund (The)		3,406		149,728
Total Securities Sold Short — 51.7% (Proceeds $707,107)			$	721,820

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

14

LYRICAL FUNDS
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
November 30, 2015

	Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund		Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund
ASSETS
Investments in securities:
At acquisition cost	$	636,748,182	$	1,492,484
At value (Note 2)	$	651,673,055	$	1,432,166
Deposits with brokers for securities sold short (Note 2)		—		677,618
Dividends receivable		1,064,305		2,290
Receivable for capital shares sold		186,819		150
Receivable from Adviser (Note 4)		—		12,148
Other assets		23,774		5,693
Total assets		652,947,953		2,130,065
LIABILITIES
Securities sold short, at value (Note 2) (proceeds $— and $707,107 respectively)		—		721,820
Payable for capital shares redeemed		185,380		—
Payable to Adviser (Note 4)		677,750		—
Payable to administrator (Note 4)		62,200		8,010
Accrued distribution fees (Note 4)		26,354		—
Accrued brokerage expense on securities sold short (Note 2)		—		561
Other accrued expenses		39,429		4,244
Total liabilities		991,113		734,635
NET ASSETS	$	651,956,840	$	1,395,430
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF:
Paid-in capital	$	623,248,407	$	1,462,185
Undistributed net investment income		1,278,084		—
Undistributed net realized gains from security transactions		12,505,476		8,276
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments		14,924,873		(60,318	)
Securities sold short		—		(14,713	)
NET ASSETS	$	651,956,840	$	1,395,430
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE:
INSTITUTIONAL CLASS
Net assets applicable to Institutional Class	$	590,581,631	$	776,530
Institutional Class shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value)		37,789,018		82,177
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share (Note 2)	$	15.63	$	9.45
INVESTOR CLASS
Net assets applicable to Investor Class	$	61,375,209	$	618,900
Investor Class shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value)		3,942,181		65,716
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share (Note 2)	$	15.57	$	9.42

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

15

LYRICAL FUNDS
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended November 30, 2015

	Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund			Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund
INVESTMENT INCOME
Dividend income	$	11,514,136		$	23,289
Foreign withholding taxes on dividends		(182,107	)		(354	)
Total investment income		11,332,029			22,935
EXPENSES
Investment advisory fees (Note 4)		8,690,662	(a)		21,583
Administration fees (Note 4)		528,108			25,000
Distribution fees - Investor Class (Note 4)		213,950			1,681
Fund accounting fees (Note 4)		94,551			31,137
Transfer agent fees (Note 4)		74,725			24,000
Custody and bank service fees		90,667			7,140
Registration and filing fees		83,999			9,082
Compliance fees (Note 4)		70,429			12,297
Professional fees		36,074			32,524
Trustees' fees and expenses (Note 4)		8,485			8,485
Postage and supplies		13,147			3,109
Dividend expense on securities sold short (Note 2)		—			12,331
Printing of shareholder reports		8,345			3,150
Prime brokerage expense on securities sold short (Note 2)		—			7,264
Insurance expense		3,164			3,164
Other expenses		18,087			8,543
Total expenses		9,934,393			210,490
Fee reductions and/or expense reimbursements by Adviser (Note 4)		(43,226	)		(164,846	)
Net expenses		9,891,167			45,644
NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)		1,440,862			(22,709	)
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS AND SECURITIES SOLD SHORT
Net realized gains (losses) from:
Investments		12,579,532			21,575
Securities sold short		—			(3,393	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on:
Investments		(31,320,202	)		(60,317	)
Securities sold short		—			2,207
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED LOSSES ON INVESTMENTS AND SECURITIES SOLD SHORT		(18,740,670	)		(39,928	)
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS	$	(17,299,808	)	$	(62,637	)

^(a) Includes $182,903 of prior years’ investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements recouped by the Adviser (Note 4).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

16

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Year Ended November 30, 2014
FROM OPERATIONS
Net investment income (loss)	$	1,440,862		$	(15,582	)
Net realized gains from security transactions		12,579,532			11,870,000
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		(31,320,202	)		37,708,433
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations		(17,299,808	)		49,562,851
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS (Note 2)
From net investment income, Institutional Class		(168,471	)		(17,629	)
From net realized gains, Institutional Class		(11,690,275	)		(1,211,369	)
From net realized gains, Investor Class		(193,318	)		—
Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders		(12,052,064	)		(1,228,998	)
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Institutional Class
Proceeds from shares sold		339,352,309			460,875,190
Net asset value of shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		9,377,973			1,000,129
Payments for shares redeemed		(282,422,299	)		(60,859,243	)
Net increase in Institutional Class net assets from capital share transactions		66,307,983			401,016,076
Investor Class
Proceeds from shares sold		118,329,002			11,209,228
Net asset value of shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		181,114			—
Payments for shares redeemed		(59,563,305	)		(2,453,295	)
Net increase in Investor Class net assets from capital share transactions		58,946,811			8,755,933
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS		95,902,922			458,105,862
NET ASSETS
Beginning of year		556,053,918			97,948,056
End of year	$	651,956,840		$	556,053,918
UNDISTRIBUTED NET INVESTMENT INCOME	$	1,278,084		$	—

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

17

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (Continued)

	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Year Ended November 30, 2014
CAPITAL SHARE ACTIVITY
Institutional Class
Shares sold		21,132,995			30,358,655
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		592,967			68,785
Shares redeemed		(17,510,391	)		(3,961,000	)
Net increase in shares outstanding		4,215,571			26,466,440
Shares outstanding at beginning of year		33,573,447			7,107,007
Shares outstanding at end of year		37,789,018			33,573,447
Investor Class
Shares sold		7,202,116			712,342
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		11,470			—
Shares redeemed		(3,826,599	)		(157,148	)
Net increase in shares outstanding		3,386,987			555,194
Shares outstanding at beginning of year		555,194			—
Shares outstanding at end of year		3,942,181			555,194

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

18

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Period Ended November 30, 2014 (a)
FROM OPERATIONS
Net investment loss	$	(22,709	)	$	(5,347	)
Net realized gains (losses) from:
Investments		21,575			5,822
Securities sold short		(3,393	)		(3,499	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on:
Investments		(60,317	)		(1	)
Securities sold short		2,207			(16,920	)
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations		(62,637	)		(19,945	)
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS (Note 2)
From net realized gains, Institutional Class		(54	)		—
From net realized gains, Investor Class		(57	)		—
Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders		(111	)		—
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Institutional Class
Proceeds from shares sold		220,000			600,000
Net asset value of shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		54			—
Net increase in Institutional Class net assets from capital share transactions		220,054			600,000
Investor Class
Proceeds from shares sold		126,747			668,686
Net asset value of shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		54			—
Payments for shares redeemed		(94,359	)		(43,059	)
Net increase in Investor Class net assets from capital share transactions		32,442			625,627
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS		189,748			1,205,682
NET ASSETS
Beginning of period		1,205,682			—
End of period	$	1,395,430		$	1,205,682
UNDISTRIBUTED NET INVESTMENT INCOME	$	—		$	—

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (July 14, 2014) through November 30, 2014.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

19

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (Continued)

	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Period Ended November 30, 2014 (a)
CAPITAL SHARE ACTIVITY
Institutional Class
Shares sold		21,883			60,288
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		6			—
Net increase in shares outstanding		21,889			60,288
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		60,288			—
Shares outstanding at end of period		82,177			60,288
Investor Class
Shares sold		12,770			67,265
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		6			—
Shares redeemed		(9,763	)		(4,562	)
Net increase in shares outstanding		3,013			62,703
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		62,703			—
Shares outstanding at end of period		65,716			62,703

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (July 14, 2014) through November 30, 2014.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

20

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
INSTITUTIONAL CLASS
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period:
	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Year Ended November 30, 2014			Period Ended November 30, 2013(a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	16.29		$	13.78		$	10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income (loss)		0.04			(0.00	)(b)		0.00	(b)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments		(0.35	)		2.66			3.78
Total from investment operations		(0.31	)		2.66			3.78
Less distributions:
Dividends from net investment income		(0.00	)(b)		(0.00	)(b)		—
Distributions from net realized gains		(0.35	)		(0.15	)		—
Total distributions		(0.35	)		(0.15	)		—
Net asset value at end of period	$	15.63		$	16.29		$	13.78
Total return (c)		(1.91	%)		19.41	%		37.80	%(d)
Net assets at end of period (000's)	$	590,582		$	547,021		$	97,948
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets		1.42	%		1.45	%		1.93	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (f)		1.42	%		1.44	%		1.45	%(e)
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets (f)		0.24	%		(0.00	%)(g)		0.01	%(e)
Portfolio turnover rate		21	%		20	%		26	%(d)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (February 4, 2013) through November 30, 2013.

^(b) Amount rounds to less than $0.01 per share.

^(c) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the periods covered. The returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of Fund shares. The total returns would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and reimbursed expenses (Note 4).

^(d) Not annualized.

^(e) Annualized.

^(f) Ratio was determined after advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements (Note 4).

^(g) Amount rounds to less than 0.01%.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

21

LYRICAL U.S. VALUE EQUITY FUND
INVESTOR CLASS
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period:
	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Period Ended November 30, 2014(a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	16.27		$	14.68
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income (loss)		0.01			(0.01	)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on investments		(0.36	)		1.60
Total from investment operations		(0.35	)		1.59
Less distributions:
Distributions from net realized gains		(0.35	)		—
Net asset value at end of period	$	15.57		$	16.27
Total return (b)		(2.19	%)		10.83	%(c)
Net assets at end of period (000's)	$	61,375		$	9,033
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets		1.72	%		2.39	%(d)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (e)		1.70	%		1.70	%(d)
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets (e)		0.03	%		(0.18	%)(d)
Portfolio turnover rate		21	%		20	%(c)(f)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (February 24, 2014) through November 30, 2014.

^(b) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the periods covered. The returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of Fund shares. The total returns would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and reimbursed expenses (Note 4).

^(c) Not annualized.

^(d) Annualized.

^(e) Ratio was determined after advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements (Note 4).

^(f) Represents the year ended November 30, 2014.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

22

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
INSTITUTIONAL CLASS
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period:
	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Period Ended November 30, 2014(a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	9.81		$	10.00
Loss from investment operations:
Net investment loss		(0.13	)		(0.04	)
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments and securities sold short		(0.23	)		(0.15	)
Total from investment operations		(0.36	)		(0.19	)
Less distributions:
Distributions from net realized gains		(0.00	)(b)		—
Net asset value at end of period	$	9.45		$	9.81
Total return (c)		(3.66	%)		(1.90%	)(d)
Net assets at end of period (000's)	$	777		$	591
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets		14.76	%		16.57	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (f)		3.16	%		2.59	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets excluding dividend expense (f)		2.27	%		1.99	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets excluding dividend expense and prime brokerage expense on securities sold short (f)		1.75	%		1.75	%(e)
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets (f)		(1.49	%)		(1.15	%)(e)
Portfolio turnover rate		7	%		9	%(d)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (July 14, 2014) through November 30, 2014.

^(b) Amount rounds to less than $0.01 per share.

^(c) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the periods covered. The returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of Fund shares. The total returns would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and reimbursed expenses (Note 4).

^(d) Not annualized.

^(e) Annualized.

^(f) Ratio was determined after advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements (Note 4).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

23

LYRICAL U.S. HEDGED VALUE FUND
INVESTOR CLASS
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period:
	Year Ended November 30, 2015			Period Ended November 30, 2014(a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	9.80		$	10.00
Loss from investment operations:
Net investment loss		(0.18	)		(0.05	)
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments and securities sold short		(0.20	)		(0.15	)
Total from investment operations		(0.38	)		(0.20	)
Less distributions:
Distributions from net realized gains		(0.00	)(b)		—
Net asset value at end of period	$	9.42		$	9.80
Total return (c)		(3.87	%)		(2.00%	)(d)
Net assets at end of period (000's)	$	619		$	614
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets		15.49	%		16.95	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (f)		3.41	%		2.84	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets excluding dividend expense (f)		2.52	%		2.24	%(e)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets excluding dividend expense and prime brokerage expense on securities sold short (f)		2.00	%		2.00	%(e)
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets (f)		(1.78	%)		(1.38	%)(e)
Portfolio turnover rate		7	%		9	%(d)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (July 14, 2014) through November 30, 2014.

^(b) Amount rounds to less than $0.01 per share.

^(c) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the periods covered. The returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of Fund shares. The total returns would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and reimbursed expenses (Note 4).

^(d) Not annualized.

^(e) Annualized.

^(f) Ratio was determined after advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements (Note 4).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

24

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
November 30, 2015

1. Organization

Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund (individually, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”) are each a diversified series of Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end investment company established as an Ohio business trust under a Declaration of Trust dated February 28, 2012. Other series of the Trust are not incorporated in this report. Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund commenced operations on February 4, 2013. Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund commenced operations on July 14, 2014.

The investment objective of each Fund is to seek to achieve long-term capital growth.

Each Fund offers two classes of shares: Institutional Class shares (sold without any sales loads and distribution and/or shareholder service fees and require a $100,000 initial investment) and Investor Class shares (sold without any sales loads, but subject to a distribution and/or shareholder service fee of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets attributable to Investor Class shares, and require a $2,500 initial investment). Each share class represents an ownership interest in the same investment portfolio.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of the Funds’ significant accounting policies. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). As an investment company, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update 2013-08, the Funds follow accounting and reporting guidance under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies.”

Securities valuation – Each Fund values its portfolio securities at market value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) (normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on each business day the NYSE is open for business. The Funds value their listed securities on the basis of the security’s last sale price on the security’s primary exchange, if available, otherwise at the exchange’s most recently quoted bid price. NASDAQ-listed securities are valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. In the event that market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable due to market or other events, the Funds value their securities and other assets at fair value in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”). Under these procedures, the securities will be classified as Level 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy (see below), depending on the inputs used. Unavailable or unreliable market quotes may be due to the following factors: a substantial bid-ask spread; infrequent sales resulting in stale prices; insufficient trading volume; small trade sizes; a temporary lapse in any reliable pricing source; and actions of the securities or futures markets, such as the suspension or limitation of trading. As a result, the prices of securities used to calculate each Fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities.

25

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

GAAP establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of each Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

● Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

● Level 2 – other significant observable inputs

● Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs

The inputs or methods used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds’ investments and other financial instruments as of November 30, 2015:

Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Investments in Securities
Common Stocks	$	640,030,583	$	—	$	—	$	640,030,583
Money Market Funds		11,642,472		—		—		11,642,472
Total	$	651,673,055	$	—	$	—	$	651,673,055

Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total
Investments in Securities
Common Stocks	$	1,381,294		$	—	$	—	$	1,381,294
Money Market Funds		50,872			—		—		50,872
Total	$	1,432,166		$	—	$	—	$	1,432,166
Other Financial Instruments
Exchange-Traded Funds - Sold Short	$	(721,820	)	$	—	$	—	$	(721,820	)

Refer to the Funds’ Schedules of Investments and Schedule of Securities Sold Short, as applicable, for a listing of securities by industry type. As of November 30, 2015, the Funds did not have any transfers into and out of any Level. In addition, the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments or any assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of November 30, 2015. It is the Funds’ policy to recognize transfers into and out of any Level at the end of the reporting period.

26

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Share valuation – The net asset value per share of each class of each Fund is calculated daily by dividing the total value of the assets attributable to that class, less liabilities attributable to that class, by the number of shares outstanding of that class. The offering price and redemption price per share of each class of each Fund is equal to the net asset value per share of such class.

Investment income – Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is accrued as earned.

Security transactions – Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined on a specific identification basis.

Common expenses – Common expenses of the Trust are allocated among the Funds and the other series of the Trust based on the relative net assets of each series or the nature of the services performed and the relative applicability to each series.

Distributions to shareholders – The Funds distribute to shareholders any net investment income dividends and net realized capital gains distributions at least once each year. The amount of such dividends and distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders by the Funds during the periods ended November 30, 2015 and November 30, 2014 was as follows:

	Period Ended	Ordinary Income	Long-Term Capital Gains	Total Distributions
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund -	11/30/2015	$7,662,064	$4,196,682	$11,858,746
Institutional Class	11/30/2014	$1,228,998	$ —	$1,228,998
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund -	11/30/2015	$123,919	$69,399	$193,318
Investor Class	11/30/2014	$ —	$ —	$ —
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund -	11/30/2015	$34	$20	$54
Institutional Class	11/30/2014	$ —	$ —	$ —
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund -	11/30/2015	$36	$21	$57
Investor Class	11/30/2014	$ —	$ —	$ —

27

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Funds made the following distributions subsequent to November 30, 2015, to shareholders of record on the record dates as listed below:

	Record Date	Ex-Date	Per Share
			Ordinary Income	Long-term Capital Gain
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Institutional Class	11/30/2015	12/1/2015	$ —	$ 0.3727
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Institutional Class	12/30/2015	12/31/2015	0.0382	—
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Investor Class	11/30/2015	12/1/2015	—	0.3727
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Investor Class	12/30/2015	12/31/2015	0.0009	—
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Institutional Class	11/30/2015	12/1/2015	—	0.0760
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Investor Class	11/30/2015	12/1/2015	—	0.0760

Short Positions – Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund may sell securities short. For financial statement purposes, an amount equal to the settlement amount is included in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as an asset and an equivalent liability is then subsequently marked-to-market daily to reflect the current value of the short position. Subsequent fluctuations in the market prices of securities sold, but not yet purchased, may require purchasing the securities at prices which may differ from the market value reflected on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund is liable for any dividends payable on securities while those securities are in a short position and will also bear other costs, such as charges for the prime brokerage accounts, in connection with the short positions. These costs are reported as dividend expense and prime brokerage expense on securities sold short, respectively, in the Statements of Operations. As collateral for its short positions, the Fund is required under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) to maintain assets consisting of cash, cash equivalents or other liquid securities equal to the market value of the securities sold short. The deposits with brokers for securities sold short are reported on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The amount of collateral is required to be adjusted daily to reflect changes in the value of the securities sold short. To the extent Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund invests the proceeds received from selling securities short, the Fund is engaging in a form of leverage. The use of leverage by the Fund may make any change in the Fund’s net asset value greater than it would be without the use of leverage. Short sales are speculative transactions and involve special risks, including greater reliance on the ability of Lyrical Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”) to accurately anticipate the future value of a security.

28

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Fund typically takes short positions in shares of exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), which are subject to additional risks including premium or discount risk (when the market value of an ETF’s shares trade at a premium or discount to the ETF’s net asset value) and index-tracking risk.

Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Federal income tax – Each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Qualification generally will relieve each Fund of liability for federal income taxes to the extent 100% of its net investment income and net realized capital gains are distributed in accordance with the Code. Accordingly, no provision for income tax has been made.

In order to avoid imposition of the excise tax applicable to regulated investment companies, it is also each Fund’s intention to declare as dividends in each calendar year at least 98% of its net investment income (earned during the calendar year) and 98.2% of its net realized capital gains (earned during the twelve months ended October 31) plus undistributed amounts from prior years.

The following information is computed on a tax basis for each item as of November 30, 2015:

	Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund			Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund
Tax cost of portfolio investments	$	640,597,468		$	1,492,484
Gross unrealized appreciation	$	71,722,379		$	121,615
Gross unrealized depreciation		(60,646,792	)		(181,933	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)		11,075,587			(60,318	)
Net unrealized depreciation on securities sold short		—			(17,680	)
Undistributed ordinary income		1,278,084			—
Undistributed long-term gains		16,354,762			11,243
Accumulated earnings (deficit)	$	28,708,433		$	(66,755	)

As of November 30, 2015, the proceeds of securities sold short on a tax basis is $704,140 for Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund.

29

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The difference between the federal income tax cost of portfolio investments and securities sold short and the financial statement cost of portfolio investments and securities sold short is due to certain timing differences in the recognition of capital gains or losses under income tax regulations and GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are temporary in nature and are primarily due to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

During the year ended November 30, 2015, Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund reclassified $5,693 of accumulated net realized gains against accumulated net investment income and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund reclassified $15,938 and $6,771 of accumulated net investment loss to paid-in-capital and accumulated net realized gains, respectively, on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Such reclassifications, the result of permanent differences between financial statement and income tax reporting requirements, had no effect on each Fund’s net assets or net asset value per share.

The Funds recognize the tax benefits or expenses of uncertain tax positions only when the position is “more likely than not” of being sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has reviewed the Funds’ tax positions for all open tax periods (periods ended November 30, 2013 through November 30, 2015 for Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and November 30, 2014 and November 30, 2015 for Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund) and has concluded that no provision for unrecognized tax benefits or expenses is required in these financial statements. The Funds indentify their major tax jurisdiction as U.S. Federal.

3. Investment Transactions

During the year ended November 30, 2015, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than short-term investments and short positions, amounted to $249,203,431 and $137,244,347, respectively, for Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and $298,651 and $91,799, respectively, for Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund.

4. Transactions with Related Parties

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Each Fund’s investments are managed by the Adviser pursuant to the terms of an Investment Advisory Agreement. Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund pay the Adviser an investment advisory fee, computed and accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 1.25% and 1.55%, respectively, of average daily net assets.

30

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Pursuant to an Expense Limitation Agreement (“ELA”) between each Fund and the Adviser, the Adviser has contractually agreed, until March 31, 2017, to reduce investment advisory fees and reimburse other operating expenses to limit total annual fund operating expenses of the Funds (exclusive of brokerage costs, taxes, borrowing costs such as interest and dividend expenses on securities sold short, interest, acquired fund fees and expenses, extraordinary expenses such as litigation and merger or reorganization costs, and other expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of each Fund’s business) to an amount not exceeding the following percentages of average daily net assets attributable to each respective class:

	Institutional Class	Investor Class
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund	1.45%	1.70%
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund	1.75%	2.00%

Accordingly, during the year ended November 30, 2015, the Adviser reduced its investment advisory fees and reimbursed expenses as follows:

	Investment Advisory Fee Reductions	Expense Reimbursements	Total
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund	$ —	$ 43,226	$ 43,226
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund	$ 21,583	$ 143,263	$ 164,846

Under the terms of the ELA, investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements by the Adviser are subject to recoupment by the Adviser for a period of three years after such fees and expenses were incurred, provided the recoupments do not cause total annual fund operating expenses of the Funds to exceed the foregoing expense limitations. During the year ended November 30, 2015, the Adviser recouped $182,903 of prior years’ investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements from Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund. As of November 30, 2015, the Adviser may seek recoupment of investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements no later than the dates as stated below:

	November 30, 2017	November 30, 2018	Total
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund	$ 10,189	$ 14,881	$ 25,070
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund	$ 59,418	$ 164,846	$ 224,264

The Principal Executive Officer of the Funds is also an officer of the Adviser.

31

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS

Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (“Ultimus”) provides fund administration, fund accounting, compliance and transfer agency services to the Funds. Each Fund pays Ultimus fees in accordance with the agreements for such services. In addition, each Fund pays out-of-pocket expenses including but not limited to postage, supplies and costs of pricing its portfolio securities.

Under the terms of a Distribution Agreement with the Trust, Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (the “Distributor”) serves as the principal underwriter to each Fund. The Distributor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ultimus.

Certain Trustees and officers of the Trust are also officers of Ultimus and/or the Distributor.

DISTRIBUTION PLAN

The Funds have adopted plans of distribution (the “Plan”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, which permits Investor Class shares of each Fund to directly incur or reimburse the Funds’ principal underwriter for certain expenses related to the distribution of its shares. The annual limitation for payment of expenses pursuant to the Plan is 0.25% of each Fund’s average daily net assets allocable to Investor Class shares. The Funds have not adopted a plan of distribution with respect to the Institutional Class shares. During the year ended November 30, 2015, the Investor Class shares of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund incurred $213,950 and $1,681, respectively, of distribution fees under the Plan.

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION

Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (“Independent Trustee”) receives from each Fund a fee of $500 for each Board meeting attended plus reimbursement of travel and other meeting-related expenses. Effective January 1, 2015, each Independent Trustee also receives a $500 annual retainer from each Fund. Trustees affiliated with the Adviser or Ultimus are not compensated by the Trust for their services.

32

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF FUND SHARES

As of November 30, 2015, the following shareholders owned of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of each class of each Fund:

NAME OF RECORD OWNER	% Ownership
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund - Institutional Class
Charles Schwab & Company, Inc. (for the benefit of its customers)	33%
Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith (for the benefit of its customers)	12%
UBS Financial Services, Inc. (for the benefit of its customers)	8%
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Institutional Class
Lyrical Asset Management LP	61%
Ann S. Riesenberg	24%
George Wellington	13%
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund - Investor Class
Lyrical Asset Management LP	76%
Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. (for the benefit of its customers)	6%

A beneficial owner of 25% or more of either Fund’s outstanding shares may be considered a controlling person. That shareholder’s vote could have a more significant effect on matters presented at a shareholder’s meeting.

5. Sector Risk

If a Fund has significant investments in the securities of issuers within a particular sector, any development affecting that sector will have a greater impact on the value of the net assets of the Fund than would be the case if the Fund did not have significant investments in that sector. In addition, this may increase the risk of loss in the Fund and increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value per share. Occasionally, market conditions, regulatory changes or other developments may negatively impact a particular sector. As of November 30, 2015, Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund had 27.5% and 28.1%, respectively, of the value of their net assets invested in stocks within the Information Technology sector.

6. Contingencies and Commitments

The Funds indemnify the Trust’s officers and Trustees for certain liabilities that might arise from their performance of their duties to the Funds. Additionally, in the normal course of business the Funds enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Funds expect the risk of loss to be remote.

33

LYRICAL FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

7. Subsequent Events

The Funds are required to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed as of the date of the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, the Funds are required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of these financial statements and has noted no such events except for the payment of ordinary income dividends and long-term capital gain distributions subsequent to the end of the reporting period, as disclosed in Note 2.

34

LYRICAL FUNDS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trustees of Ultimus Managers Trust and the Shareholders of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund, a series of shares of beneficial interest in Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Fund”), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2015, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and for the period February 4, 2013 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2013. We have also audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund, a series of shares of beneficial interest in Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Fund”), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2015, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, and the statements of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period July 14, 2014 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2014. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2015 by correspondence with the custodian and broker. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund as of November 30, 2015, and the results of their operations, the changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for each of the years or periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BBD, LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 26, 2016

35

LYRICAL FUNDS
ABOUT YOUR FUNDS’ EXPENSES (Unaudited)

We believe it is important for you to understand the impact of costs on your investment. As a shareholder of the Funds, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, class-specific expenses (such as distribution fees) and other operating expenses. The following examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

A mutual fund’s ongoing costs are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The expenses in the table below are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the most recent period (June 1, 2015) and held until the end of the period (November 30, 2015).

The table below illustrates each Fund’s ongoing costs in two ways:

Actual fund return – This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from each Fund’s actual return, and the fourth column shows the dollar amount of operating expenses that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Funds. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.

To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for the Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”

Hypothetical 5% return – This section is intended to help you compare each Fund’s ongoing costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that each Fund had an annual return of 5% before expenses during the period shown, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case, because the return used is not the Funds’ actual return, the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess each Fund’s ongoing costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.

Note that expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only. The Funds do not charge transaction fees, such as purchase or redemption fees, nor do they carry a “sales load.”

The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.

36

LYRICAL FUNDS
ABOUT YOUR FUNDS’ EXPENSES (Unaudited) (Continued)

More information about the Funds’ expenses can be found in this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to each Fund’s prospectus.

	Beginning Account Value June 1, 2015	Ending Account Value November 30, 2015	Net Expense Ratio(a)	Expenses Paid During Period(b)
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund
Institutional Class
Actual	$1,000.00	$923.20	1.39%	$6.70
Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$1,018.10	1.39%	$7.03
Investor Class
Actual	$1,000.00	$921.30	1.69%	$8.14
Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$1,016.60	1.69%	$8.54
Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund
Institutional Class
Actual	$1,000.00	$ 922.00	3.30%	$15.90
Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$ 1,008.52	3.30%	$16.62
Investor Class
Actual	$1,000.00	$920.80	3.55%	$17.09
Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$1,007.27	3.55%	$17.86

^(a) Annualized, based on the Fund's most recent one-half year expenses.

^(b) Expenses are equal to the Funds' annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

37

LYRICAL FUNDS
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited)

A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free 1-888-884-8099, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free 1-888-884-8099, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

The Trust files a complete listing of portfolio holdings for the Funds with the SEC as of the end of the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. These filings are available upon request by calling 1-888-884-8099. Furthermore, you may obtain a copy of the filings on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Trust’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC, and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)

In accordance with federal tax requirements, the following provides shareholders with information concerning distributions from ordinary income and net realized gains made by each Fund during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015. Certain dividends paid by the Funds may be subject to a maximum tax rate of 23.8%, as provided by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund intend to designate up to a maximum amount of $7,785,983 and $70, respectively, as taxed at a maximum rate of 23.8%. Additionally, Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund intend to designate up to a maximum amount of $4,266,081 and $41, respectively, as a long-term capital gain distributions. As required by federal regulations, complete information was computed and reported in conjunction with your 2014 Form 1099-DIV.

38

LYRICAL FUNDS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Unaudited)

Overall responsibility for management of the Funds rests with the Board of Trustees. The Trustees serve during the lifetime of the Trust and until its termination, or until death, resignation, retirement or removal. The Trustees, in turn, elect the officers of the Funds to actively supervise its day-to-day operations. The officers have been elected for an annual term. Unless otherwise noted, each Trustee’s and officer’s address is 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450, Cincinatti, Ohio 45246. The following are the Trustees and executive officers of the Funds as of January 26, 2016:

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position Held with the Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Trust Overseen by Trustee	Directorships of Public Companies Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Interested Trustees:
Robert G. Dorsey* Year of Birth: 1957	Since February 2012	Trustee (February 2012 to present) President (June 2012 to October 2013)	Managing Director of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC and Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (1999 to present)	21	None
Independent Trustees:
Janine L. Cohen Year of Birth: 1952	Since January 2016	Trustee	Retired since 2013; Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2013 and Chief Compliance Officer from 2008 to 2013 at AER Advisors, Inc.	21	None
John C. Davis Year of Birth: 1952	Since June 2012	Chairman (July 2014 to present) Trustee (June 2012 to present)	Consultant since May 2011; Retired Partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (1974-2010)	21	None

39

LYRICAL FUNDS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Unaudited) (Continued)

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position Held with the Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Trust Overseen by Trustee	Directorships of Public Companies Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
David M. Deptula Year of Birth: 1958	Since June 2012	Trustee	Vice President of Legal and Special Projects at Dayton Freight Lines, Inc. since February 2016; Vice President of Tax at The Standard Register Company from 2011 to 2016; Tax Partner at Deloitte Tax LLP from 1984 to 2011	21	None
John J. Discepoli Year of Birth: 1963	Since June 2012	Trustee	Owner of Discepoli Financial Planning, LLC (personal financial planning company) since November 2004	21	None

* Mr. Dorsey is considered an “interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, as amended, because of his relationship with the Trust’s administrator, transfer agent and distributor.

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position Held with the Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Executive Officers:
Andrew B. Wellington 405 Park Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10022 Year of Birth: 1968	Since January 2013	Principal Executive Officer of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund	Managing Director of Lyrical Asset Management LP (2008 to present)

40

LYRICAL FUNDS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
(Unaudited) (Continued)

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position Held with the Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
David R. Carson Year of Birth: 1958	Since April 2013	President (October 2013 to present) Vice President (April 2013 to October 2013)	Vice President and Director of Client Strategies of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2013 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, FSI LBAR Fund (2013 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, The Huntington Funds (2005 to 2013), The Flex-Funds (2006 to 2011), Meeder Financial (2007 to 2011), Huntington Strategy Shares (2012 to 2013), and Huntington Asset Advisors (2013); Vice President, Huntington National Bank (2001 to 2013).
Jennifer L. Leamer Year of Birth: 1976	Since April 2014	Treasurer (October 2014 to present) Assistant Treasurer (April 2014 to October 2014)	Vice President, Mutual Fund Controller of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2014 to present); Business Analyst of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2007 to 2014)
Bo J. Howell Year of Birth: 1981	Since October 2014	Secretary (April 2015 to present); Assistant Secretary (October 2014 to April 2015)	Vice President, Director of Fund Administration for Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2014 to present); Counsel – Securities and Mutual Funds for Western & Southern Financial Group (2012 to 2014); U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Senior Counsel (2009 to 2012)
Charles C. Black Year of Birth: 1979	Since April 2015	Chief Compliance Officer (January 2016 to present) Assistant Chief Compliance Officer (April 2015 to January 2016)	Senior Compliance Officer of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2015 to present); Senior Compliance Manager for Touchstone Mutual Funds (2013 to 2015); Senior Compliance Manager for Fund Evaluation Group (2011 to 2013); Regulatory Administration Specialist for JPMorgan Chase Bank (2006 to 2011)

Additional information about members of the Board and executive officers is available in each Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”). To obtain a free copy of the SAI, please call 1-888-884-8099.

41

LYRICAL FUNDS
DISCLOSURE REGARDING APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited)

The Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including the Independent Trustees voting separately, has reviewed and approved each Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with Lyrical Asset Management LP (the “Adviser”) for an additional annual term. Approval took place at an in-person meeting held on October 20, 2015, at which all of the Trustees were present.

In the course of their deliberations, the Board was advised by legal counsel. The Board received and reviewed a substantial amount of information provided by the Adviser in response to requests of the Board and its counsel.

In considering the Investment Advisory Agreement and reaching their conclusions with respect thereto, the Board reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below.

The nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Adviser. In this regard, the Board reviewed the services being provided by the Adviser to the Funds including, without limitation, its investment advisory services since each Fund’s inception, the Adviser’s compliance procedures and practices, and its efforts to promote the Funds, and assist in their distribution. The Board also noted that the Funds’ Principal Executive Officer is an employee of the Adviser and serves the Funds without additional compensation. After reviewing the foregoing information and further information regarding the Adviser’s business, the Board concluded that the quality, extent, and nature of the services provided by the Adviser were satisfactory and adequate for the Funds.

The investment performance of the Funds. In this regard, the Board compared the performance of each Fund with the performance of its benchmark index, custom peer group, and Morningstar categories. The Board also considered the consistency of the Adviser’s management with each Fund’s investment objective and policies. Following discussion of the investment performance of each Fund, the Adviser’s experience in managing mutual funds, private funds, and separate accounts, its historical investment performance, and other factors, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund has been satisfactory.

The costs of the services provided and profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates from its relationship with the Funds. In this regard, the Board considered the Adviser’s staffing and methods of operating; the education and experience of its personnel; its compliance program; its financial condition and the level of commitment to the Funds; the asset level of each Fund; the overall expenses of each Fund, including the advisory fee; and the differences in fees and services to the Adviser’s other similar clients. The Board discussed the Adviser’s Expense Limitation Agreement (the “ELA”) with the Funds, and considered the Adviser’s current and past fee reductions and expense reimbursements for the Funds. The Board further took into account the Adviser’s willingness to continue the ELA for the Funds until at least March 31, 2017.

42

LYRICAL FUNDS
DISCLOSURE REGARDING APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (Continued)

The Board also considered potential benefits for the Adviser in managing the Funds, including promotion of the Adviser’s name. The Board compared each Fund’s advisory fee and overall expense ratio to the average and median advisory fees and expense ratios for its peer group and Morningstar categories and fees charged to the Adviser’s other client accounts. In considering the comparison in fees and expense ratios between the Funds and other comparable funds, the Board looked at the differences in types of funds being compared, the style of investment management, the size of the Funds, and the nature of the investment strategies. The Board noted that each Fund’s advisory fee was higher than the average advisory fee for the Fund’s peer group and Morningstar category. The Board also considered the Adviser’s commitment to limit each Fund’s expenses under the ELA. The Board further noted that the overall expense ratios for each Fund was higher than the average and median expense ratio for the Fund’s peer group and Morningstar category. The Board also compared the fees paid by each Fund to the fees paid by other clients of the Adviser, and considered the similarities and differences of services received by such other clients as compared to the services provided to the Fund. Following these comparisons and upon further consideration of the foregoing, the Board concluded that for each Fund the advisory fees paid to the Adviser by each Fund were fair and reasonable.

The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow and whether advisory fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Funds’ investors. In this regard, the Board considered that for each Fund the fee arrangements with the Adviser involve both the advisory fee and the ELA. The Board determined that while the advisory fee for each Fund remains the same as asset levels increase, the shareholders of the Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund have experienced benefits from the ELA and shareholders of the Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund will continue to experience benefits from the ELA until the Fund’s assets grow to a level where its expenses otherwise fall below the expense limit. Following further consideration of the asset levels for each Fund, expectations for growth, and level of fees, the Board determined that the fee arrangements with the Adviser will continue to provide benefits and that each Fund’s arrangements were fair and reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services being provided by the Adviser.

Brokerage and portfolio transactions. In this regard, the Board considered the Adviser’s policies and procedures and performance in seeking best execution for its clients, including the Funds. The Board also considered the historical portfolio turnover rate for each Fund; the process by which evaluations are made of the overall reasonableness of commissions paid; the method and basis for selecting and evaluating broker-dealers; and any anticipated allocation of portfolio business to persons affiliated with the Adviser. After further review and discussion, the Board determined that the Adviser’s practices regarding brokerage and portfolio transactions are satisfactory.

43

LYRICAL FUNDS
DISCLOSURE REGARDING APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (Continued)

Possible conflicts of interest. In evaluating the possibility for conflicts of interest, the Board considered such matters as the experience and abilities of the advisory personnel assigned to the Funds; the Adviser’s process for allocating trades among the Funds and its other clients; and the substance and administration of the Adviser’s code of ethics. Following further consideration and discussion, the Board found that the Adviser’s standards and practices relating to the identification and mitigation of potential conflicts of interests were satisfactory.

Conclusion

After full consideration of the above factors as well as other factors, the Board unanimously concluded that approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of each Fund and its shareholders.

44

This page intentionally left blank.

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND

(RLCBX)

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND

(RLLCX)

Annual Report

November 30, 2015

RYAN LABS FUNDS
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS December 14, 2015

Dear Shareholders,

Following is the Annual Report to shareholders of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund (collectively, the “Funds”) for the periods ended November 30, 2015. On behalf of the investment manager, Ryan Labs Asset Management, Inc., we would like to thank you for your continued investment.

MARKET SUMMARY

Most of the second half of 2015 was extremely volatile in both equity and credit markets. Spreads widened throughout the quarter with names in energy, metals, and mining companies trading at some of their widest spreads over the past 5 years, propelled by volatility in commodity prices. After West Texas Intermediate crude oil recovered to about $60 per barrel in the first half of 2015, the price plunged all the way to $38.24 per barrel in August. Copper, which saw highs of the year in May at $2.95 per pound, was near an annual low by November at $2.04 per pound. Commodities have continued to retest their yearly lows. There has also been pushback by credit investors on corporate fundamentals, particularly in non-financial credit. Leverage, measured a number of different ways such as Debt/EBITDA, is even higher than 2007 levels in non-financial corporates. Low all-in yields at this stage of the credit cycle have continued to attract debt issuance and debt-fueled merger and acquisition activity, while top line growth at many firms has been low. Year to date through November 30, 2015, issuance in the investment-grade corporate debt market was $1.17 trillion, with financials and health care issuers leading the debt market. The mortgage and securitized sectors came under increased pressure along with other risk sectors and actually underperformed corporate bonds with similar ratings.

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND

INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY

The investment objective of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund (the “Core Bond Fund”) is to seek total return (consisting of current income and capital appreciation) versus the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (the “Core Bond Benchmark”). The Core Bond Fund seeks this investment objective while providing protection against interest rate risk. We attempt to accomplish this investment objective by investing at least 80% of Core Bond Fund assets in U.S. dollar-denominated, investment-grade debt securities. The portfolio’s sensitivity to interest rate changes is intended to track the market for domestic, investment-grade fixed-income securities. The modified duration of the Core Bond Fund’s investment portfolio at the end of each calendar month will typically be within half a year of the Core Bond Benchmark. The primary strategies utilized for value-add are sector rotation, issue selection, and yield curve positioning.

1

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

From the Core Bond Fund’s inception on December 29, 2014 through November 30, 2015, the Fund returned +0.81% compared to the Core Bond Benchmark return of +1.04%, therefore underperforming the Benchmark by 0.23%. For the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2015, the portfolio returned +0.38% versus the benchmark return of +0.43%.

PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION

The Core Bond Fund’s portfolio was overweight corporate bonds and securitized products relative to the Core Bond Benchmark. The portfolio was underweight U.S. Treasuries and government-related securities. October and November were the strongest months in the Corporate Credit market in the second half of the year, posting positive excess returns relative to duration-neutral Treasuries. The 10-year U.S. Treasury traded at a high of 2.49% in June, fell to 1.97% in October, and finally rebounded to 2.20% at the end of November. The year-to-date excess returns, versus duration-neutral U.S. Treasuries, was -1.09% for the Barclays Credit Index and -3.47% for Barclays Long Credit Index. For a historical context, investment grade, fixed income credit spreads in the Core Bond Benchmark ended 2011 at 217 basis points (“bps”), 2012 at 133bps, tightened to 111bps at the end of 2013, widened to 125 bps at the end of 2014, and were at 140 bps at the end of November 2015. Spreads on Financials sector credits ended November 2015 at 129 bps compared to 119 bps in May 2015 and 117 bps at the end of 2014. Industrials sector credit spreads widened to 170 bps in November 2015 from 141 bps at the end of May 2015. Year to date, agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) underperformed duration-neutral U.S. Treasuries by -15 bps, while commercial MBS outperformed by 42 bps and asset-backed securities (“ABS”) outperformed by 55bps.

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND

INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY

The investment objective of Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund (the “Long Credit Fund”) is to seek total return (consisting of current income and capital appreciation). The benchmark for this strategy is the Barclays U.S. Long Credit Index (the “Long Credit Benchmark”). We attempt to accomplish this investment objective by investing at least 80% of the Long Credit Fund’s assets in U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade debt securities. The portfolio’s sensitivity to interest rate changes is intended to track the market for domestic, investment-grade fixed-income securities. The modified duration of the Long Credit Fund’s investment portfolio at the end of each calendar month will typically be within half a year of the Long Credit Benchmark. The primary strategies utilized for value-add are sector rotation, issue selection, and yield curve positioning.

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

The inception date of the Long Credit Fund was November 13, 2015. The Long Credit Fund’s total return from inception through November 30, 2015 was 0.71% compared to the Long Credit Benchmark return of 1.08%, therefore underperforming the benchmark by 0.37%. This underperformance was due to uninvested cash in the Fund during the period from Fund launch to November 30, 2015, as the Fund’s assets were allocated to investments.

2

OUTLOOK

For both Funds, in terms of domestic and global economic growth, we could see subdued nominal and real growth worldwide as Asian, emerging, and developed market economies struggle with aging demographics, relative currency valuations, high public and private debt loads, severe declines in commodities, and imbalanced fiscal and economic policies. “Lower-for-longer” and the anticipated increase in the Federal Funds rate should lead to a modest flattening in the yield curve. This projected outcome should be supportive for the U.S. Dollar and to the detriment of those sectors and companies with a larger component of U.S. export operations. Equity valuations appear stretched on traditional fundamental metrics, but will likely remain supported by share buybacks, dividends, and merger and acquisition activity. Spreads have cheapened for the past year and a half with intermittent periods of rallies due to fundamental shifts in the corporate landscape and a solid backdrop technically. Almost $1.17 trillion in investment grade corporate debt supply has been priced in 2015 with similar expectations for next year. Net supply is forecast to be in the mid-$500 billion range, so if demand flows continue into the asset class, gross supply should be absorbed at expected spread levels. Relative value opportunity continues in the financials sector, while challenged sectors such as Basic Materials and Energy will remain an area of concern for investors. Absolute and excess return potential is expected to be lower in this rate environment. As to investment grade corporate bonds, the last twelve months have experienced a secular move wider in spreads versus Treasuries, meaning corporate credit has underperformed U.S. Treasury securities. Although this has been an across-the-board move, certainly energy and basic materials credits have performed the worst in the face of lower commodity prices. There are likely investment opportunities here but it’s futile to attempt to pick a bottom. In addition, the spread between A-rated and BBB-rated corporates are at a seven year wide. The only other times in the last 20 years that this spread was wider was the last two recessions.

For the Core Bond Fund, in the government-backed mortgage sectors, the Federal Reserve Board has continued to taper and has stopped reinvesting the cash flow and allowing the portfolio to run off. There is also increased discussion on merging Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into one entity. We actually prefer the wider levels and higher yields prevailing in the market place today as we believe this will offset rising Treasury rates. For 2016, we could expect higher issuance in ABS and credit risk transfer mortgage debt and lower net supply in commercial MBS as bonds continue to mature. We believe the structured risk sector is poised to outperform corporate credit as we move into 2016 after having lagged in the past quarter.

Sean McShea

President, Ryan Labs Asset Management

3

Past performance is not predictive of future performance. Investment results and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. Performance data current to the most recent month end are available by calling 1-866-561-3087.

An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Funds carefully before investing. The Funds’ prospectus contains this and other important information. To obtain a copy of the Funds’ prospectus, please visit our website at www.ryanlabsfunds.com or call 1-866-561-3087 and a copy will be sent to you free of charge. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest. Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund are distributed by Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC.

The Letter to Shareholders seeks to describe some of the Adviser’s current opinions and views of the financial markets. Although the Adviser believes it has a reasonable basis for any opinions or views expressed, actual results may differ, sometimes significantly so, from those expected or expressed. The securities held by the Funds that are discussed in the Letter to Shareholders were held during the period covered by this Report. They do not comprise the entire investment portfolios of the Funds, may be sold at any time and may no longer be held by the Funds. The opinions of the Funds’ Adviser with respect to those securities may change at any time.

Statements in the Letter to Shareholders that reflect projections or expectations for future financial or economic performance of the Funds and the market in general and statements of the Funds’ plans and objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that actual results or events will not differ materially from those projected, estimated, assumed, or anticipated in any such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could result in such differences, in addition to factors noted with such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, general economic conditions, such as inflation, recession, and interest rates. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

4

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Comparison of the Change in Value of a $10,000 Investment in
Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund versus the
Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index

Total Returns For the Period Ended November 30, 2015
	Since Inception(b)
Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund(a)	0.81%
Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index	1.04%

^(a) The Fund’s total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of shares.

^(b) The Fund commenced operations on December 29, 2014.

5

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Comparison of the Change in Value of a $10,000 Investment in
Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund versus the Barclays U.S. Long Credit Index

Total Returns For the Period Ended November 30, 2015
	Since Inception(b)
Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund(a)	0.71%
Barclays U.S. Long Credit Index	1.08%

^(a) The Fund’s total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions, if any, or the redemption of shares.

^(b) The Fund commenced operations on November 13, 2015.

6

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
PORTFOLIO INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Asset Allocation (% of Net Assets)

Top 10 Holdings**

Security Description	% of Net Assets
U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.750%, due 10/31/17	13.9%
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.375%, due 10/31/20	11.2%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.500%, due 02/15/36	9.6%
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	6.2%
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB5379, 3.500%, due 06/01/42	2.7%
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2014-4, Class D, 3.100%, due 11/16/20	2.2%
U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.250%, due 11/15/25	1.9%
UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2011-C1, Class E, 144A, 6.084%(a), due 01/10/45	1.5%
WF-RBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2011-C2, Class D, 144A, 5.468%(a), due 02/15/44	1.5%
Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2014-KY0, Class E, 144A, 2.547%(a), due 06/11/27	1.5%

** Excludes cash equivalents.

^(a) Variable rate security. The rate shown is the effective interest rate as of November 30, 2015.

7

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
PORTFOLIO INFORMATION
November 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Asset Allocation (% of Net Assets)

Top 10 Holdings

Security Description	% of Net Assets
U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.250%, due 11/15/25	6.3%
Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.050%, due 03/15/34	4.0%
GE Capital International Funding Company, 144A, 4.418%, due 11/15/35	3.0%
AT&T, Inc., 4.500%, due 05/15/35	2.8%
Wells Fargo & Company, 4.300%, due 07/22/27	2.6%
Microsoft Corporation, 4.200%, due 11/03/35	2.1%
Lockheed Martin Corporation, 4.700%, due 05/15/46	2.0%
Citigroup, Inc., 4.450%, due 09/29/27	2.0%
21st Century Fox America, Inc., 144A, 4.950%, due 10/15/45	2.0%
Novartis Capital Corporation, 4.000%, due 11/20/45	2.0%

8

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2015

U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS — 40.7%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
U.S. Treasury Notes — 30.6%
U.S. Treasury Notes		0.750%	10/31/17	$	9,825,000	$	9,790,838
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.000%	11/30/19		250,000		245,156
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.375%	08/31/20		165,000		163,008
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.375%	09/30/20		170,000		167,755
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.375%	10/31/20		7,950,000		7,841,928
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.250%	04/30/21		160,000		163,963
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.000%	10/31/21		55,000		55,415
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.875%	11/30/21		25,000		24,996
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.875%	10/31/22		750,000		744,170
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.000%	02/15/23		40,000		39,986
U.S. Treasury Notes		1.750%	05/15/23		170,000		166,454
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.000%	02/15/25		430,000		422,257
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.125%	05/15/25		125,000		123,936
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.000%	08/15/25		225,000		220,509
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.250%	11/15/25		1,305,000		1,308,722
							21,479,093
U.S. Treasury Bonds — 10.1%
U.S. Treasury Bonds		4.500%	02/15/36		5,255,000		6,766,837
U.S. Treasury Bonds		2.500%	02/15/45		80,000		72,000
U.S. Treasury Bonds		3.000%	05/15/45		295,000		294,723
							7,133,560
Total U.S. Treasury Obligations (Cost $28,526,580)						$	28,612,653

U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY OBLIGATIONS — 0.0% (a)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Federal National Mortgage Association — 0.0% (a)
Federal National Mortgage Association (Cost $30,157)		1.125%	04/27/17	$	30,000	$	30,121

9

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES — 23.5%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Commercial — 11.4%
Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2014-KYO, Class D, 144A (b)		2.196%	06/11/27	$	45,000	$	44,530
Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2014-KYO, Class E, 144A (b)		2.547%	06/11/27		1,045,000		1,035,976
Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2012-CR4, Class D, 144A (b)		4.573%	10/15/45		20,000		18,939
Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2013-LC6, Class AM		3.282%	01/10/46		49,000		49,475
Credit Suisse Mortgage Trust, Series 2013-IVR3, Class A1, 144A (b)		2.500%	05/25/43		509,855		486,613
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2015-C3, Class C (b)		4.362%	08/15/48		180,000		171,806
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2015-C3, Class D (b)		3.362%	08/15/48		160,000		121,952
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2015-C1, Class C (b)		4.301%	04/15/50		275,000		266,834
CSAIL Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2015-C2, Class D (b)		4.212%	06/15/57		80,000		65,088
FREMF Mortgage Trust, Series 2015-K50, Class B (b) (c)		3.778%	08/25/25		1,000,000		867,047
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2010-C2, Class D, 144A (b)		5.542%	11/15/43		25,000		26,149
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2013-C13, Class C (b)		4.055%	01/15/46		410,000		403,418
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2013-C17, Class C (b)		4.887%	01/15/47		390,000		399,490
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2014-C19, Class C (b)		4.676%	04/15/47		240,000		240,946
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2012-LC9, Class C, 144A (b)		4.420%	12/15/47		20,000		20,181
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2012-LC9, Class E, 144A (b)		4.567%	12/15/47		711,000		670,685
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation, Series 2015-C28, Class C (b)		4.240%	10/15/48		195,000		176,263
Starwood Retail Property Trust, Series 2014-STAR, Class C, 144A (b)		2.695%	11/15/27		45,000		44,832

10

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES — 23.5% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Commercial — 11.4% (Continued)
UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2011-C1, Class E, 144A (b)		6.084%	01/10/45	$	1,000,000	$	1,088,138
Wells Fargo Home Equity Trust, Series 2005-4, Class M1 (b)		0.656%	12/25/35		730,000		696,204
WF-RBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2011-C2, Class D, 144A (b)		5.468%	02/15/44		1,000,000		1,070,271
WF-RBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2012-C10, Class D, 144A (b)		4.456%	12/15/45		25,000		23,744
							7,988,581
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation — 3.8%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #J19087		3.000%	05/01/27		432,288		448,103
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #G18481		3.000%	09/01/28		315,993		327,552
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #A93093		4.500%	07/01/40		147,771		161,608
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #Q19470		3.000%	06/01/43		251,047		252,344
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #Q20576		3.000%	08/01/43		444,177		446,327
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #G08572		3.500%	02/01/44		192,530		199,192
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Pool #G08677		4.000%	11/01/45		805,115		853,427
							2,688,553
Federal National Mortgage Association — 8.0%
Federal National Mortgage Association, Series 2015-M7, Class AB2		2.502%	12/25/24		80,000		78,959
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AJ7494		3.000%	12/01/26		299,933		311,613
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB5490		3.000%	06/01/27		110,240		114,530
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AO7976		3.000%	06/01/27		112,114		116,495
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AL3773		3.000%	06/01/28		121,317		126,063
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB5379		3.500%	06/01/42		1,833,543		1,903,355
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB6670		3.000%	10/01/42		225,812		227,590

11

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES — 23.5% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Federal National Mortgage Association — 8.0% (Continued)
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB9350		3.000%	05/01/43	$	200,556	$	201,947
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB9345		3.000%	05/01/43		476,001		479,309
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AB9558		3.000%	06/01/43		466,740		469,977
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AE0443		6.500%	06/01/43		36,103		41,378
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AT5860		3.500%	06/01/43		844,259		876,073
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AL4010		3.500%	07/01/43		204,065		212,225
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AL5625		3.500%	03/01/44		126,355		131,318
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AL5538		4.000%	07/01/44		97,585		104,210
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pool #AS5165		3.000%	06/01/45		232,764		234,093
							5,629,135
Government National Mortgage Association — 0.3%
Government National Mortgage Association, Pool #5175		4.500%	09/20/41		139,403		151,717
Government National Mortgage Association, Series 2014-14, Class BL		2.750%	04/16/46		36,917		37,326
Government National Mortgage Association, Series 2014-75, Class AC		2.546%	06/16/53		33,936		34,346
							223,389
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $16,602,136)						$	16,529,658

12

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES — 9.8%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
American Credit Acceptance Receivable Trust, Series 2014-4, Class C, 144A		4.250%	10/12/20	$	1,000,000	$	1,002,229
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2013-5, Class D		2.860%	12/09/19		460,000		464,392
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2014-1, Class D		2.540%	06/08/20		75,000		75,122
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2014-2, Class D		2.570%	07/08/20		230,000		228,408
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2013-4, Class D		3.310%	10/08/20		30,000		30,524
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2014-3, Class D		3.130%	10/08/20		250,000		251,766
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2014-4, Class D		3.070%	11/09/20		240,000		239,227
AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2015-2, Class D		3.000%	06/08/21		290,000		287,381
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding Aesop, LLC, Series 2012-3A, Class B, 144A		3.040%	03/20/19		50,000		49,897
Capital Auto Receivables Asset Trust, Series 2013-4, Class D		3.220%	05/20/19		30,000		30,390
Capital Auto Receivables Asset Trust, Series 2014-2, Class C		2.410%	05/20/19		90,000		90,611
Capital Auto Receivables Asset Trust, Series 2014-1, Class D		3.390%	07/22/19		330,000		335,539
Capital Auto Receivables Asset Trust, Series 2014-2, Class D		2.810%	08/20/19		75,000		75,628
Capital Auto Receivables Asset Trust, Series 2014-3, Class D		3.140%	02/20/20		300,000		299,801
Cronos Containers Program Ltd., Series 2013-1A, Class A, 144A		3.080%	04/18/28		29,667		29,296
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2014-1A, Class C, 144A		3.570%	07/15/19		60,000		60,165
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2014-2A, Class C, 144A		3.260%	12/16/19		40,000		39,475
MVW Owner Trust, Series 2013-1A, Class B, 144A		2.740%	04/22/30		18,945		18,804
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2014-2, Class D		2.760%	02/18/20		160,000		159,667
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2014-3, Class D		2.650%	08/17/20		240,000		240,039
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2014-4, Class D		3.100%	11/16/20		1,540,000		1,545,834
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2014-5, Class D		3.210%	01/15/21		40,000		40,378

13

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES — 9.8% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2015-1, Class D		3.240%	04/15/21	$	150,000	$	149,781
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2015-2, Class D		3.020%	04/15/21		135,000		132,350
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2015-3, Class D		3.490%	05/17/21		545,000		543,002
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2015-4, Class D		3.530%	08/16/21		170,000		169,649
Sierra Receivables Funding Company, LLC, Series 2013-3A, Class B, 144A		2.700%	10/20/30		10,178		10,190
Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, Series 15-DN1, Class M2 (b)		2.596%	01/25/25		150,000		151,974
Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes, Series 15-DNA1, Class M2 (b)		2.046%	10/25/27		115,000		113,700
Total Asset-Backed Securities (Cost $6,866,524)						$	6,865,219

CORPORATE BONDS — 14.9%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Consumer Discretionary — 2.0%
AmerisourceBergen Corporation		3.400%	05/15/24	$	35,000	$	34,315
AmerisourceBergen Corporation		4.250%	03/01/45		205,000		187,447
Coach, Inc.		4.250%	04/01/25		115,000		109,241
Comcast Corporation		3.600%	03/01/24		510,000		532,311
Comcast Corporation		4.200%	08/15/34		100,000		99,131
DIRECTV Holdings, LLC		4.600%	02/15/21		315,000		337,351
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.		3.400%	11/15/25		20,000		19,735
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.		3.900%	11/01/25		15,000		14,902
Penske Truck Leasing Company, L.P., 144A		3.300%	04/01/21		30,000		29,869
							1,364,302
Energy — 0.5%
Ensco plc		5.200%	03/15/25		35,000		28,837
Ensco plc		5.750%	10/01/44		90,000		69,647
Noble Holding International Ltd.		5.950%	04/01/25		15,000		12,021
Noble Holding International Ltd.		6.950%	04/01/45		240,000		173,393
ONEOK Partners, L.P.		3.375%	10/01/22		15,000		12,808
Rowan Companies, Inc.		4.750%	01/15/24		30,000		23,248
Total Capital Canada Ltd.		1.550%	06/28/17		40,000		40,179
Total Capital Canada Ltd.		1.450%	01/15/18		15,000		14,982
							375,115

14

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

CORPORATE BONDS — 14.9% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Financials — 5.8%
American Express Company		7.000%	03/19/18	$	35,000	$	39,042
Bank of America Corporation		1.650%	03/26/18		245,000		244,671
Bank of America Corporation		7.625%	06/01/19		175,000		205,069
Bank of America Corporation		5.875%	01/05/21		135,000		153,930
BB&T Corporation		2.050%	06/19/18		20,000		20,060
Bear Stearns Companies, LLC		7.250%	02/01/18		320,000		356,445
BNP Paribas		2.400%	12/12/18		230,000		232,600
Citigroup, Inc.		3.300%	04/27/25		185,000		182,175
Duke Realty, L.P.		3.750%	12/01/24		35,000		34,076
Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC		5.875%	08/02/21		230,000		258,367
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		6.250%	09/01/17		275,000		297,001
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		2.625%	01/31/19		300,000		305,398
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		2.750%	09/15/20		190,000		191,194
Hospitality Properties Trust		4.500%	03/15/25		110,000		107,568
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.		2.600%	08/02/18		115,000		115,882
JPMorgan Chase & Company		2.250%	01/23/20		345,000		343,833
JPMorgan Chase & Company		4.950%	06/01/45		230,000		232,636
Morgan Stanley		5.550%	04/27/17		20,000		21,101
Stifel Financial Corporation		3.500%	12/01/20		340,000		338,648
SunTrust Banks, Inc.		2.350%	11/01/18		15,000		15,098
Ventas Realty, L.P.		2.000%	02/15/18		10,000		9,991
Wells Fargo & Company		4.300%	07/22/27		370,000		380,947
							4,085,732
Health Care — 3.0%
AbbVie, Inc.		4.700%	05/14/45		245,000		240,757
Actavis Funding SCS		3.450%	03/15/22		25,000		25,280
Actavis Funding SCS		4.750%	03/15/45		405,000		403,775
Actavis, Inc.		1.875%	10/01/17		30,000		30,046
Amgen, Inc.		2.200%	05/22/19		125,000		124,918
Amgen, Inc.		3.125%	05/01/25		40,000		38,154
Amgen, Inc.		4.400%	05/01/45		360,000		334,732
Biogen, Inc.		4.050%	09/15/25		385,000		388,100
Celgene Corporation		3.875%	08/15/25		10,000		9,960
Celgene Corporation		5.000%	08/15/45		185,000		184,985
Gilead Sciences, Inc.		3.250%	09/01/22		15,000		15,188
Gilead Sciences, Inc.		3.650%	03/01/26		45,000		45,423
McKesson Corporation		2.284%	03/15/19		15,000		15,024
Medtronic, Inc.		2.500%	03/15/20		30,000		30,382
Medtronic, Inc.		4.625%	03/15/45		120,000		123,192
Mylan, Inc.		1.800%	06/24/16		10,000		9,992

15

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

CORPORATE BONDS — 14.9% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Health Care — 3.0% (Continued)
Mylan, Inc.		2.550%	03/28/19	$	70,000	$	68,635
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.		1.400%	12/15/17		10,000		9,993
Welltower, Inc.		2.250%	03/15/18		25,000		24,987
							2,123,523
Industrials — 0.5%
Glencore Funding, LLC, 144A		2.500%	01/15/19		55,000		45,100
Lockheed Martin Corporation		3.800%	03/01/45		355,000		314,946
							360,046
Information Technology — 0.7%
Broadcom Corporation		2.700%	11/01/18		15,000		15,173
Microsoft Corporation		3.500%	02/12/35		355,000		326,536
Motorola Solutions, Inc.		3.750%	05/15/22		120,000		111,043
QUALCOMM, Inc.		3.000%	05/20/22		10,000		9,677
QUALCOMM, Inc.		4.650%	05/20/35		20,000		17,591
							480,020
Materials — 1.0%
Agrium, Inc.		3.375%	03/15/25		105,000		97,164
Ecolab, Inc.		1.450%	12/08/17		125,000		124,266
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.		2.375%	03/15/18		200,000		170,086
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.		5.000%	04/15/19		65,000		69,831
Southern Copper Corporation		3.875%	04/23/25		290,000		262,776
							724,123
Telecommunication Services — 0.8%
AT&T, Inc.		3.400%	05/15/25		25,000		24,261
Verizon Communications, Inc.		2.500%	09/15/16		103,000		104,184
Verizon Communications, Inc.		6.350%	04/01/19		10,000		11,364
Verizon Communications, Inc.		4.500%	09/15/20		15,000		16,286
Verizon Communications, Inc.		4.150%	03/15/24		25,000		26,188
Verizon Communications, Inc.		6.550%	09/15/43		295,000		355,717
							538,000
Utilities — 0.6%
Buckeye Partners, L.P.		2.650%	11/15/18		125,000		121,440
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC		5.300%	02/15/40		105,000		121,339
Electricite de France S.A., 144A		3.625%	10/13/25		20,000		19,794
Oglethorpe Power Corporation		6.100%	03/15/19		60,000		66,457
PacifiCorp		4.100%	02/01/42		105,000		102,399
							431,429
Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $10,593,804)						$	10,482,290

16

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

INTERNATIONAL BONDS — 0.2%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
United Mexican States (Cost $124,847)		4.000%	10/02/23	$	120,000	$	122,400

EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS — 6.2%	Shares		Value
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (Cost $4,293,477)		37,273	$	4,320,313

MONEY MARKET FUNDS — 12.7%	Shares		Value
Fidelity Institutional Money Market Government Portfolio - Class I, 0.01% (d)		5,592,210	$	5,592,210
Invesco Short-Term Investments Trust - Treasury Portfolio - Institutional Shares, 0.02% (d)		3,346,384		3,346,384
Total Money Market Funds (Cost $8,938,594)			$	8,938,594
Total Investments at Value — 108.0% (Cost $75,976,119)			$	75,901,248
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (8.0%)				(5,644,022	)
Net Assets — 100.0%			$	70,257,226

144A - This is a restricted security that was acquired in a transaction exempt from Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. The total value of such securities is $5,834,877 at November 30, 2015, representing 8.3% of net assets.

^(a) Percentage rounds to less than 0.1%.

^(b) Variable rate security. The rate shown is the effective interest rate as of November 30, 2015.

^(c) Security value has been determined in good faith by the Board of Trustees. The total value of such securities is $867,047 at November 30, 2015, representing 1.2% of net assets (Note 2).

^(d) The rate shown is the 7-day effective yield as of November 30, 2015.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

17

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2015

U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS — 7.4%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
U.S. Treasury Notes — 6.4%
U.S. Treasury Notes		2.250%	11/15/25	$	3,140,000	$	3,148,955
U.S. Treasury Notes		4.750%	02/15/37		50,000		66,576
							3,215,531
U.S. Treasury Bonds — 1.0%
U.S. Treasury Bonds		2.875%	08/15/45		490,000		477,999
Total U.S. Treasury Obligations (Cost $3,665,680)						$	3,693,530

MUNICIPAL BONDS — 5.3%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Bay Area, CA, Toll Authority Toll Bridge, Revenue		6.263%	04/01/49	$	580,000	$	774,961
California State, Build America Bonds, GO		7.550%	04/01/39		500,000		738,460
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales & Transfer Tax Receipts, Pension Funding, Series A, Revenue		6.899%	12/01/40		95,000		110,248
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority Sales & Transfer Tax Receipts, Series B, Revenue		6.899%	12/01/40		50,000		58,025
New York State Dormitory Authority Personal Income Tax Revenue Build America Bonds, Revenue		5.389%	03/15/40		750,000		899,625
New York, NY, Build America Bonds, GO		5.206%	10/01/31		65,000		72,857
Total Municipal Bonds (Cost $2,637,138)						$	2,654,176

CORPORATE BONDS — 80.8%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Consumer Discretionary — 6.1%
21st Century Fox America, Inc., 144A		4.950%	10/15/45	$	980,000	$	992,060
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.		4.500%	11/15/45		200,000		196,871
Hasbro, Inc.		6.350%	03/15/40		300,000		332,786
Time Warner, Inc.		7.700%	05/01/32		25,000		31,856
Time Warner, Inc.		6.750%	06/15/39		200,000		206,411

18

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

CORPORATE BONDS — 80.8%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Consumer Discretionary — 6.1% (Continued)
Time Warner, Inc.		4.850%	07/15/45	$	1,000,000	$	973,990
Viacom, Inc.		5.250%	04/01/44		400,000		341,090
							3,075,064
Energy — 7.1%
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.		6.500%	02/01/42		600,000		534,700
EnLink Midstream Partners, L.P.		5.050%	04/01/45		200,000		154,716
Enterprise Products Operating, L.P.		5.100%	02/15/45		500,000		454,287
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.		6.500%	09/01/39		550,000		471,835
Noble Holding International Ltd.		6.950%	04/01/45		400,000		288,988
Petroleos Mexicanos		5.500%	06/27/44		455,000		375,375
Rio Tinto Finance USA Ltd.		3.750%	06/15/25		490,000		468,806
Rowan Companies, Inc.		5.850%	01/15/44		490,000		342,314
Williams Partners, L.P.		4.000%	09/15/25		575,000		469,609
							3,560,630
Financials — 21.1%
Alleghany Corporation		4.900%	09/15/44		490,000		475,255
Citigroup, Inc.		4.450%	09/29/27		1,000,000		999,411
GE Capital International Funding Company, 144A		4.418%	11/15/35		1,460,000		1,497,653
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.		4.750%	10/21/45		780,000		779,911
Hospitality Properties Trust		4.650%	03/15/24		630,000		622,650
HSBC Bank USA		5.875%	11/01/34		500,000		583,212
JPMorgan Chase & Company		4.950%	06/01/45		700,000		708,023
Lincoln National Corporation		7.000%	06/15/40		400,000		503,644
MetLife, Inc.		4.875%	11/13/43		500,000		525,345
Protective Life Corporation		8.450%	10/15/39		400,000		529,703
Santander Issuances, S.A.		5.179%	11/19/25		400,000		401,640
Societe Generale, 144A		4.750%	11/24/25		500,000		493,516
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association, 144A		4.900%	09/15/44		675,000		693,178
UBS Group Funding, 144A		4.125%	09/24/25		500,000		502,193
Wells Fargo & Company		4.300%	07/22/27		1,250,000		1,286,984
							10,602,318
Health Care — 10.3%
AbbVie, Inc.		4.700%	05/14/45		540,000		530,647
Amgen, Inc.		4.400%	05/01/45		250,000		232,453
Baxalta, Inc., 144A		4.000%	06/23/25		500,000		495,469
Biogen, Inc.		5.200%	09/15/45		500,000		502,024
Gilead Sciences, Inc.		4.750%	03/01/46		600,000		609,548
Koninklijke Philips N.V.		5.000%	03/15/42		300,000		292,443

19

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

CORPORATE BONDS — 80.8% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Health Care — 10.3% (Continued)
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings		4.700%	02/01/45	$	540,000	$	493,733
Medtronic, Inc.		4.625%	03/15/45		500,000		513,301
Novartis Capital Corporation		4.000%	11/20/45		1,000,000		985,364
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.		4.750%	07/15/45		490,000		515,787
							5,170,769
Industrials — 8.3%
Burlington North Santa Fe Corporation		4.700%	09/01/45		500,000		505,906
Ford Motor Company		4.750%	01/15/43		300,000		287,325
Ingersoll-Rand Luxembourg Finance S.A.		4.650%	11/01/44		400,000		384,884
International Paper Company		4.800%	06/15/44		400,000		371,034
Lockheed Martin Corporation		4.700%	05/15/46		1,000,000		1,023,943
Mosaic Company		5.625%	11/15/43		350,000		354,955
Norfolk Southern Corporation		4.650%	01/15/46		500,000		481,914
United Technologies Corporation		4.500%	06/01/42		760,000		771,281
							4,181,242
Information Technology — 7.6%
Apple, Inc.		3.450%	02/09/45		1,000,000		859,015
HP Enterprise Company, 144A		6.350%	10/15/45		250,000		240,364
Intel Corporation		4.900%	07/29/45		170,000		179,521
KLA-Tencor Corporation		5.650%	11/01/34		400,000		397,895
Lam Research Corporation		3.800%	03/15/25		350,000		332,364
Microsoft Corporation		4.200%	11/03/35		1,025,000		1,035,582
Oracle Corporation		6.500%	04/15/38		600,000		758,537
							3,803,278
Materials — 3.1%
BHP Billiton Finance USA Ltd.		5.000%	09/30/43		480,000		459,212
Burlington Resources Finance Company		7.200%	08/15/31		525,000		657,447
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.		5.400%	11/14/34		75,000		47,977
Southern Copper Corporation		5.875%	04/23/45		500,000		397,680
							1,562,316
Telecommunication Services — 8.2%
AT&T, Inc.		4.500%	05/15/35		1,500,000		1,407,720
Comcast Corporation		4.250%	01/15/33		500,000		499,885
Motorola Solutions, Inc.		5.500%	09/01/44		250,000		195,407
Verizon Communications, Inc.		5.050%	03/15/34		1,980,000		2,017,917
							4,120,929

20

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

CORPORATE BONDS — 80.8% (Continued)	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Utilities — 9.0%
Alabama Power Company		4.150%	08/15/44	$	500,000	$	481,234
Buckeye Partners, L.P.		5.600%	10/15/44		350,000		284,438
Consolidated Edison Company		4.500%	12/01/45		500,000		505,888
Duke Energy Progress, Inc.		4.375%	03/30/44		700,000		715,992
Electricite de France S.A., 144A		4.950%	10/13/45		750,000		735,837
Exelon Generation Company, LLC		5.600%	06/15/42		500,000		481,248
Pacific Gas & Electric Company		6.050%	03/01/34		500,000		599,774
PacifiCorp		6.250%	10/15/37		100,000		125,443
PacifiCorp		6.350%	07/15/38		500,000		626,639
							4,556,493
Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $40,562,380)						$	40,633,039

INTERNATIONAL BONDS — 4.4%	Coupon		Maturity	Par Value		Value
Federal Republic of Brazil		5.625%	01/07/41	$	400,000	$	318,000
Republic of Colombia		5.000%	06/15/45		200,000		175,000
Republic of Peru		6.550%	03/14/37		250,000		296,250
Republic of Turkey		4.250%	04/14/26		500,000		473,750
United Mexican States		4.750%	03/08/44		1,000,000		940,000
Total International Bonds (Cost $2,214,492)						$	2,203,000

MONEY MARKET FUNDS — 1.1%	Shares		Value
Invesco Short-Term Investments Trust - Treasury Portfolio - Institutional Shares, 0.02% (a) (Cost $577,225)		577,225	$	577,225
Total Investments at Value — 99.0% (Cost $49,656,915)			$	49,760,970
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities 1.0%				517,320
Net Assets — 100.0%			$	50,278,290

144A - This is a restricted security that was acquired in a transaction exempt from Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. The total value of such securities is $5,650,270 at November 30, 2015, representing 11.2% of net assets.

^(a) The rate shown is the 7-day effective yield as of November 30, 2015.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

21

RYAN LABS FUNDS
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
November 30, 2015

	Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund			Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
ASSETS
Investments in securities:
At acquisition cost	$	75,976,119		$	49,656,915
At value (Note 2)	$	75,901,248		$	49,760,970
Dividends and interest receivable		244,710			506,095
Receivable from Adviser (Note 4)		7,467			2,892
Receivable for securities sold		457,746			1,488,190
Other assets		4,966			1,700
TOTAL ASSETS		76,616,137			51,759,847
LIABILITIES
Payable for securities purchased		6,300,899			1,411,478
Distributions payable		33,537			55,500
Payable to administrator (Note 4)		8,060			5,670
Other accrued expenses		16,415			8,909
TOTAL LIABILITIES		6,358,911			1,481,557
NET ASSETS	$	70,257,226		$	50,278,290
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF:
Paid-in capital	$	70,291,941		$	50,000,501
Undistributed net investment income		24,345			204
Accumulated net realized gains from security transactions		15,811			173,530
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(74,871	)		104,055
NET ASSETS	$	70,257,226		$	50,278,290
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value)		7,115,100			5,000,050
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per share (Note 2)	$	9.87		$	10.06

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

22

RYAN LABS FUNDS
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Periods Ended November 30, 2015
	Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund (a)			Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund (b)
INVESTMENT INCOME
Dividend income	$	201		$	35
Interest		501,491			67,358
TOTAL INCOME		501,692			67,393
EXPENSES
Investment advisory fees (Note 4)		76,336			11,688
Fund accounting fees (Note 4)		23,947			2,200
Administration fees (Note 4)		23,660			2,470
Registration and filing fees		16,655			5,810
Pricing costs		19,357			500
Professional fees		16,182			1,485
Compliance fees (Note 4)		11,185			500
Transfer agent fees (Note 4)		11,000			500
Trustees’ fees and expenses (Note 4)		9,784			—
Custody and bank service fees		7,773			1,115
Insurance expense		2,999			—
Postage and supplies		2,688			—
Printing of shareholder reports		2,411			—
Other expenses		4,250			—
TOTAL EXPENSES		228,227			26,268
Less fee reductions and expense reimbursements by the Adviser (Note 4)		(151,891	)		(14,580	)
NET EXPENSES		76,336			11,688
NET INVESTMENT INCOME		425,356			55,705
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS
Net realized gains from investment transactions		40,150			173,530
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		(74,871	)		104,055
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS		(34,721	)		277,585
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS	$	390,635		$	333,290

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (December 29, 2014) through November 30, 2015.

^(b) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (November 13, 2015) through November 30, 2015.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

23

RYAN LABS FUNDS
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Period Ended November 30, 2015 (a) Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund			Period Ended November 30, 2015 (b) Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
FROM OPERATIONS
Net investment income	$	425,356		$	55,705
Net realized gains from investment transactions		40,150			173,530
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		(74,871	)		104,055
Net increase in net assets from operations		390,635			333,290
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS
From net investment income		(425,350	)		(55,501	)
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
Proceeds from shares sold		72,008,782			50,000,500
Net asset value of shares issued in reinvestment of distributions to shareholders		283,659			1
Payments for shares redeemed		(2,000,500	)		—
Net increase from capital share transactions		70,291,941			50,000,501
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET ASSETS		70,257,226			50,278,290
NET ASSETS
Beginning of period		—			—
End of period	$	70,257,226		$	50,278,290
UNDISTRIBUTED NET INVESTMENT INCOME	$	24,345		$	204
CAPITAL SHARE ACTIVITY
Shares sold		7,286,856			5,000,050
Shares reinvested		28,495			—	(c)
Shares redeemed		(200,251	)		—
Increase in shares outstanding		7,115,100			5,000,050
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		—			—
Shares outstanding at end of period		7,115,100			5,000,050

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (December 29, 2014) through November 30, 2015.

^(b) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (November 13, 2015) through November 30, 2015.

^(c) Rounds to less than 1 share.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

24

RYAN LABS CORE BOND FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period
	Period Ended November 30, 2015 (a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	10.00
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income		0.21
Net realized and unrealized losses on investments		(0.13	)
Total from investment operations		0.08
Less distributions from:
Net investment income		(0.21	)
Net asset value at end of period	$	9.87
Total return (b)		0.81	%(c)
Net assets at end of period (000’s)	$	70,257
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets (f)		1.18	%(d)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (e) (f)		0.40	%(d)
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (e) (f) (g)		2.21	%(d)
Portfolio turnover rate		161	%(c)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (December 29, 2014) through November 30, 2015.

^(b) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the period covered, which assumes any dividends or capital gains distributions are reinvested in shares of the Fund. The return shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. The total return would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and reimbursed expenses (Note 4).

^(c) Not annualized.

^(d) Annualized.

^(e) Ratio was determined after investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements. (Note 4).

^(f) Ratios do not reflect the Fund’s proportionate share of expenses of the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests.

^(g) Recognition of net investment income by the Fund is affected by the timing of the declaration of dividends by the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

25

RYAN LABS LONG CREDIT FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding Throughout the Period
	Period Ended November 30, 2015 (a)
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	10.00
Income from investment operations:
Net investment income		0.01
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments		0.06
Total from investment operations		0.07
Less distributions from:
Net investment income		(0.01	)
Net asset value at end of period	$	10.06
Total return (b)		0.71	%(c)
Net assets at end of period (000’s)	$	50,278
Ratios/supplementary data:
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets		1.12	%(d)
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets (e)		0.50	%(d)
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (e)		2.38	%(d)
Portfolio turnover rate		93	%(c)

^(a) Represents the period from the commencement of operations (November 13, 2015) through November 30, 2015.

^(b) Total return is a measure of the change in value of an investment in the Fund over the period covered, which assumes any dividends or capital gains distributions are reinvested in shares of the Fund. The return shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. The total return would be lower if the Adviser had not reduced advisory fees and reimbursed expenses (Note 4).

^(c) Not annualized.

^(d) Annualized.

^(e) Ratio was determined after investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements. (Note 4).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

26

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
November 30, 2015

1. Organization

Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund (individually, a “Fund,” and collectively, the “Funds”) are each a diversified series of Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end investment company established as an Ohio business trust under a Declaration of Trust dated February 28, 2012. Other series of the Trust are not incorporated in this report. Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund commenced operations on December 29, 2014 and November 13, 2015, respectively.

Each Fund’s investment objective is total return, consisting of current income and capital appreciation.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of the Funds’ significant accounting policies. The policies are in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principals in the United States of America (“GAAP”). As an investment company, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update 2013-08, the Funds follow accounting and reporting guidance under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies.”

Securities valuation – The Funds’ fixed income securities are generally valued using prices provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The independent pricing service uses information with respect to transactions in bonds, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities, and various relationships between securities in determining these prices. The methods used by the independent pricing service and the quality of valuations so established are reviewed by Ryan Labs, Inc. (the “Adviser”), under the general supervision of the Board. Exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) are valued at market value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) (normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on each business day the NYSE is open for business. ETFs are valued at the security’s last sale price on the primary exchange, if available, otherwise at the exchange’s most recently quoted bid price. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under procedures adopted by the Board.

GAAP establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds’ investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

● Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

● Level 2 – other significant observable inputs

● Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs

27

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Fixed income securities held by the Funds are classified as Level 2 since values are based on prices provided by an independent pricing service that utilizes various “other significant observable inputs” including bid and ask quotations, prices of similar securities, and interest rates, among other factors.

The inputs or methods used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value each Fund’s investments as of November 30, 2015:

Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
U.S. Treasury Obligations	$	—	$	28,612,653	$	—	$	28,612,653
U.S. Government Agency Obligations		—		30,121		—		30,121
Mortgage-Backed Securities		—		16,529,658		—		16,529,658
Asset-Backed Securities		—		6,865,219		—		6,865,219
Corporate Bonds		—		10,482,290		—		10,482,290
International Bonds		—		122,400		—		122,400
Exchange-Traded Funds		4,320,313		—		—		4,320,313
Money Market Funds		8,938,594		—		—		8,938,594
Total	$	13,258,907	$	62,642,341	$	—	$	75,901,248

Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
U.S. Treasury Obligations	$	—	$	3,693,530	$	—	$	3,693,530
Municipal Bonds		—		2,654,176		—		2,654,176
Corporate Bonds		—		40,633,039		—		40,633,039
International Bonds		—		2,203,000		—		2,203,000
Money Market Funds		577,225		—		—		577,225
Total	$	577,225	$	49,183,745	$	—	$	49,760,970

As of November 30, 2015, the Funds did not have any transfers into and out of any Level. In addition, the Funds did not hold derivative instruments or any assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of November 30, 2015. It is the Funds’ policy to recognize transfers into and out of any Level at the end of the reporting period.

28

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Share valuation – The net asset value per share of each Fund is calculated daily by dividing the total value of its assets, less liabilities, by the number of shares outstanding. The offering price and redemption price per share of each Fund is equal to the net asset value per share.

Investment income – Interest income is accrued as earned. Discounts and premiums on fixed income securities purchased are accreted or amortized using the effective interest method. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Security transactions – Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined on a specific identification basis.

Common expenses – Common expenses of the Trust are allocated among the Funds and other series of the Trust based on the relative net assets of each series or the nature of the services performed and the relative applicability to each series.

Distributions to shareholders – Dividends from net investment income are declared and paid monthly to shareholders. Net realized capital gains, if any, are distributed at least once each year. The amount of distributions from net investment income and net realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The tax character of distributions paid by the Funds during the periods ended November 30, 2015 was ordinary income. On December 31, 2015, Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund paid net investment income dividends of $0.0200 and $0.0354 per share, respectively, and short-term capital gains distributions of $0.0072 and $0.0347 per share, respectively, to shareholders of record on December 30, 2015.

Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Federal income tax – Each Fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). Qualification generally will relieve the Funds of liability for federal income taxes to the extent 100% of its net investment income and net realized capital gains are distributed in accordance with the Code. Accordingly, no provision for income tax has been made.

In order to avoid imposition of the excise tax applicable to regulated investment companies, it is also each Fund’s intention to declare as dividends in each calendar year at least 98% of its net investment income (earned during the calendar year) and 98.2% of its net realized capital gains (earned during the twelve months ended October 31) plus undistributed amounts from prior years.

29

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following information is computed on a tax basis for each item as of November 30, 2015:

	Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund			Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
Tax cost of portfolio investments	$	75,986,840		$	49,660,406
Gross unrealized appreciation	$	215,323		$	269,811
Gross unrealized depreciation		(300,915	)		(169,247	)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(85,592	)		100,564
Undistributed ordinary income		50,877			177,225
Accumulated earnings (deficit)	$	(34,715	)	$	277,789

The difference between the federal income tax cost of portfolio investments and the financial statement cost for Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund is due to certain timing differences in the recognition of capital gains or losses under income tax regulations and GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are temporary in nature and are primarily due to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

For the period ended November 30, 2015, Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund reclassified $24,339 of accumulated net investment income against accumulated net realized gains from security transactions on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities due to permanent differences in the recognition of capital gains or losses under income tax regulations and GAAP. These differences are due to the tax treatment of paydown adjustments. Such reclassifications had no effect on the Fund’s net assets or net asset value per share.

The Funds recognize the tax benefits or expenses of uncertain tax positions only when the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has reviewed each Fund’s tax positions for the current period and has concluded that no provision for unrecognized tax benefits or expenses is required in these financial statements. The Funds indentify their major tax jurisdiction as U.S. Federal.

3. Investment Transactions

During the periods ended November 30, 2015 cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than U.S. Government securities and short-term investments were as follows:

	Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund		Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
Purchase of investment securities	$	41,865,986	$	45,414,263
Proceeds from sales of investment securities	$	14,309,666	$	—

30

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

During the periods ended November 30, 2015, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of U.S. government long-term securities were as follows:

	Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund		Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
Purchase of U.S. government securities	$	56,776,733	$	49,362,965
Proceeds from sales of U.S. government securities	$	20,567,478	$	45,871,154

4. Transactions with Related Parties

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

The Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sun Life Financial, Inc. Each Fund is managed by the Adviser pursuant to the terms of an Investment Advisory Agreement. Under the Investment Advisory Agreements, Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund pay the Adviser an advisory fee, computed and accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 0.40% and 0.50%, respectively, of each Fund’s average daily net assets.

Pursuant to an Expense Limitation Agreements (“ELAs”) between each Fund and the Adviser, the Adviser has agreed until March 31, 2017 to reduce advisory fees and reimburse other expenses in order to limit total annual operating expenses of the Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and until March 31, 2018 for the Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund (exclusive of brokerage transaction costs and commissions; taxes; interest; costs related to any securities lending program; transaction charges and interest on borrowed money; acquired fund fees and expenses; distribution and/or shareholder servicing fees, including, without limitation, any amounts, if any, payable pursuant to a plan adopted in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940; extraordinary expenses such as litigation and merger or reorganization costs; proxy solicitation and liquidation costs; indemnification payments to the Funds’ service providers, including, without limitation, the Adviser; other expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of each Fund’s business; and any other expenses the exclusion of which may from time to time be deemed appropriate as an excludable expense and specifically approved by the Trustees of the Trust) to an amount not exceeding 0.40% and 0.50%, respectively, of each Fund’s average daily net assets. Accordingly, the Adviser did not collect any of its advisory fees and, in addition, reimbursed other operating expenses totaling $75,555 and $2,892 for Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund, respectively, during the periods ended November 30, 2015.

Under the terms of the ELAs, investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements by the Adviser are subject to recoupment by the Adviser for a period of three years after such fees and expenses were incurred, provided the recoupments do not cause total annual operating expenses of the Funds to exceed 0.40% and 0.50%, respectively, of each Fund’s average daily net assets. As of November 30, 2015, the Adviser may seek recoupment of

31

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

investment advisory fee reductions and expense reimbursements totaling $151,891 and $14,580 for Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund, respectively, no later than November 30, 2018.

OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS

Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (“Ultimus”) provides fund administration, fund accounting, compliance and transfer agency services to the Funds. The Funds pay Ultimus fees in accordance with the agreements for such services. In addition, the Funds pay out-of-pocket expenses including, but not limited to, postage, supplies and costs of pricing the Funds’ portfolio securities.

Under the terms of a Distribution Agreement with the Trust, Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (the “Distributor”) serves as principal underwriter to the Funds. The Distributor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ultimus. The Distributor is compensated by the Adviser (not the Funds) for acting as principal underwriter.

Certain officers and a Trustee of the Trust are also officers of Ultimus and the Distributor and are not paid by the Funds for serving in such capacities.

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION

Each Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust (“Independent Trustee”) receives from each Fund a fee of $500 for each Board meeting attended plus reimbursement of travel and other meeting-related expenses. In addition, each Independent Trustee receives from each Fund an annual retainer of $500. Trustees affiliated with the Adviser or Ultimus are not compensated by the Funds for their services.

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF FUND SHARES

As of November 30, 2015, the following shareholders owned of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of each Fund:

NAME OF RECORD OWNER	% Ownership
Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund
Citibank N.A. (for the benefit of its customers)	71%
U.S. Bank (for the benefit of its customers)	24%
Northern Trust (for the benefit of its customers)	5%
Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
Citibank N.A. (for the benefit of its customers)	100%

A beneficial owner of 25% or more of a Fund’s outstanding shares may be considered a controlling person of that Fund. That shareholder’s vote could have a more significant effect on matters presented at a shareholder’s meeting.

32

RYAN LABS FUNDS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

5. Contingencies and Commitments

The Funds indemnify the Trust’s officers and Trustees for certain liabilities that might arise from their performance of their duties to the Funds. Additionally, in the normal course of business the Funds enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Funds expect the risk of loss to be remote.

6. Subsequent Events

The Funds are required to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed as of the date of the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, the Funds are required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of these financial statements and has noted no such events.

33

RYAN LABS FUNDS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trustees of Ultimus Managers Trust
and the Shareholders of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund, a series of shares of beneficial interest in Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Fund”), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2015, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the period December 29, 2014 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2015. We have also audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund, a series of shares of beneficial interest in Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Fund”), including the schedule of investments, as of November 30, 2015, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the period November 13, 2015 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2015. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2015 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate procedures where confirmations were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund as of November 30, 2015, and the results of their operations, the changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BBD, LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 27, 2016

34

RYAN LABS FUNDS
ABOUT YOUR FUNDS’ EXPENSES (Unaudited)

We believe it is important for you to understand the impact of costs on your investment. As a shareholder of the Funds, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees and other operating expenses. The following examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

A mutual fund’s ongoing costs are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The expenses in the table below are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the most recent period (June 1, 2015 and November 13, 2015 for Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund, respectively) and held until the end of the period (November 30, 2015).

The table below illustrates each Fund’s ongoing costs in two ways:

Actual fund return – This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from each Fund’s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount of operating expenses that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Funds. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.

To do so, simply divide your accjount value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for each Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”

Hypothetical 5% return – This section is intended to help you compare each Fund’s ongoing costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that each Fund had an annual return of 5% before expenses during the period shown, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case, because the return used is not each Fund’s actual return, the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the SEC requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess each Fund’s ongoing costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.

Note that expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only. The Funds do not charge transaction fees, such as purchase or redemption fees, nor do they carry a “sales load.”

The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.

35

RYAN LABS FUNDS
ABOUT YOUR FUNDS’ EXPENSES (Unaudited) (Continued)

More information about each Fund’s expenses can be found in this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to each Fund’s prospectus.

Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund	Beginning Account Value June 1, 2015	Ending Account Value November 30, 2015	Net Expense Ratio (a)	Expenses  Paid During Period (b)
Based on Actual Fund Return	$1,000.00	$992.80	0.40%	$2.00
Based on Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$1,023.06	0.40%	$2.03

^(a) Annualized, based on Fund’s most recent one-half year expenses.

^(b) Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund	Beginning Account Value June 1, 2015 (a)	Ending Account Value November 30, 2015	Net Expense Ratio (b)	Expenses  Paid During Period (c)
Based on Actual Fund Return	$1,000.00	$1,007.10	0.50%	$0.23
Based on Hypothetical 5% Return (before expenses)	$1,000.00	$1,022.56	0.50%	$2.54

^(a) Beginning Account Value is as of November 13, 2015 (date of commencement of operations) for the Actual Fund Return information.

^(b) Annualized, based on the Fund’s expenses for the period since inception.

^(c) Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 17/365 (to reflect the period since inception) and 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period), for Actual Fund Return and Hypothetical 5% Return information, respectively.

36

RYAN LABS FUNDS
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited)

A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free 1-866-561-3087, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge upon request on or before August 31, 2016 by calling toll-free 1-866-561-3087, or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

The Trust files a complete listing of portfolio holdings for the Funds with the SEC as of the end of the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. These filings are available upon request by calling 1-866-561-3087. Furthermore, you may obtain a copy of the filings on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Trust’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC, and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

37

RYAN LABS FUNDS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

(Unaudited)

The Board has overall responsibility for management of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees serve during the lifetime of the Trust and until its termination, or until death, resignation, retirement, or removal. The Trustees, in turn, elect the officers of the Fund to actively supervise its day-to-day operations. The officers have been elected for an annual term. Unless otherwise noted, each Trustee’s and officer’s address is 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450, Cincinnati, Ohio 45246. The following are the Trustees and executive officers of the Funds as of January 26, 2016:

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Trust Overseen by Trustee	Directorships of Public Companies Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Interested Trustees:
Robert G. Dorsey* Year of Birth: 1957	Since February 2012	Trustee (February 2012 to present) President (June 2012 to October 2013)	Managing Director of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC and Ultimus Fund Distributors, LLC (1999 to present)	21	n/a
Independent Trustees:
Janine L. Cohen Year of Birth: 1952	Since January 2016	Trustee	Retired since 2013; Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2013 and Chief Compliance Officer from 2008 to 2013 at AER Advisors, Inc.	21	n/a
John C. Davis Year of Birth: 1952	Since June 2012	Chairman (July 2014 to present) Trustee (June 2012 to present)	Consultant since May 2011; Retired Partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (1974 to 2010)	21	n/a

* Mr. Dorsey is considered an “interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, because of his relationship with the Trust’s administrator, transfer agent and distributor.

38

RYAN LABS FUNDS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Trust Overseen by Trustee	Directorships of Public Companies Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years
Independent Trustees (continued):
David M. Deptula Year of Birth: 1958	Since June 2012	Trustee	Vice President of Legal and Special Projects at Dayton Freight Lines, Inc. since February 2016; Vice President of Tax Treasury at The Standard Register Inc. (formerly The Standard Register Company) since November 2011; Tax Partner at Deloitte Tax LLP from 1984 to 2011	21	n/a
John J. Discepoli Year of Birth: 1963	Since June 2012	Trustee	Owner of Discepoli Financial Planning, LLC (personal financial planning company) since November 2004	21	n/a

39

RYAN LABS FUNDS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (Unaudited) (Continued)

Name and Year of Birth	Length of Time Served	Position(s) Held with Trust	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Executive Officers:
David R. Carson Year of Birth: 1958	Since April 2013	President (October 2013 to present) Principal Executive Officer of Ryan Labs Funds (October 2014 to present) Vice President (April 2013 to October 2013)	Vice President and Director of Client Strategies of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2013 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, FSI LBAR Fund (2013 to present); Chief Compliance Officer, The Huntington Funds (2005 to 2013), The Flex-Funds (2006 to 2011), Meeder Financial (2007 to 2011), Huntington Strategy Shares (2012 to 2013), and Huntington Asset Advisors (2013); Vice President, Huntington National Bank (2001 to 2013)
Jennifer L. Leamer Year of Birth: 1976	Since April 2014	Treasurer (October 2014 to present) Assistant Treasurer (April 2014 to October 2014)	Vice President, Mutual Fund Controller of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2014 to present); Business Analyst of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2007 to 2014)
Bo J. Howell Year of Birth: 1981	Since October 2014	Secretary (April 2015 to present) Assistant Secretary (October 2014 to April 2015)	Vice President, Director of Fund Administration for Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2014 to present); Counsel – Securities and Mutual Funds for Western & Southern Financial Group (2012 to 2014); U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Senior Counsel (2009 to 2012)
Charles C. Black Year of Birth: 1979	Since April 2015	Chief Compliance Officer (January 2016 to present) Assistant Chief Compliance Officer (April 2015 to January 2016)	Senior Compliance Officer of Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC (2015 to present); Senior Compliance Manager for Touchstone Mutual Funds (2013 to 2015); Senior Compliance Manager for Fund Evaluation Group (2011 to 2013); Regulatory Administration Specialist for JPMorgan Chase Bank (2006 to 2011)

Additional information about members of the Board and executive officers is available in the Funds’ Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”). To obtain a free copy of the SAI, please call 1-866-561-3087.

40

RYAN LABS FUNDS
DISCLOSURE REGARDING APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited)

The Board, including the Independent Trustees voting separately, has reviewed and approved the Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund’s (the “Long Credit Fund”) Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser for an initial two-year term. Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement took place at an in-person meeting held on August 19, 2015, at which all of the Trustees were present.

In the course of their deliberations, the Board was advised by legal counsel. The Board received and reviewed information provided by the Adviser in response to requests of the Board and counsel.

In considering the Investment Advisory Agreement and reaching their conclusions with respect thereto, the Board reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors described below.

The nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Adviser. The Board considered the responsibilities the Adviser would have under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Board noted that the Adviser’s responsibilities for the Long Credit Fund were the same as those under the advisory agreement for the Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund (the “Core Bond Fund”). Accordingly, the Board reviewed both the proposed services for the Long Credit Fund and the services being provided by the Adviser to the Core Bond Fund including, without limitation, the Adviser’s investment advisory services since the Core Bond Fund’s inception, the Adviser’s coordination of services for the Long Credit Fund’s service providers, the Adviser’s compliance procedures and practices, and the Adviser’s plans to promote the Long Credit Fund. After reviewing the foregoing information and the materials the Adviser provided to the Board, the Board concluded that the quality, extent, and nature of the services provided by the Adviser are satisfactory and adequate for the Long Credit Fund.

The investment performance of the Long Credit Fund and the Adviser. The Board considered the investment management experience of the Adviser and thoroughly discussed the Long Credit Fund’s investment objective and strategies. The Board also discussed the Adviser’s experience in managing similar types of strategies and its plans for implementing such strategies. The Board also considered the consistency of the Adviser’s management of the Core Bond Fund with its investment objective and policies. After consideration of these factors, as well as other factors, the Board determined that the Adviser has the requisite experience to serve as investment adviser for the Long Credit Fund.

The costs of the services to be provided and profits and benefits to be realized by the Adviser from its relationship with the Long Credit Fund. The Board considered the Adviser’s staffing, personnel, and operations; the Adviser’s compliance policies and procedures; the financial condition of the Adviser and its parent company, Sun Life Financial, Inc., and each entity’s level of commitment to the Long Credit Fund and the Adviser’s business; the Adviser’s payment of startup costs for the Long Credit Fund; and the projected overall expenses of the Long Credit Fund, including projected fee reductions and expense reimbursements by the

41

RYAN LABS FUNDS
DISCLOSURE REGARDING APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (Continued)

Adviser on behalf of the Long Credit Fund under the ELA with the Adviser. The Board also considered the aggregate fees to be charged to the Long Credit Fund under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Board considered the Adviser’s potential profitability and benefits from managing the Long Credit Fund, including promotion of the Adviser’s name. Following these comparisons and upon further consideration of the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fees to be paid to the Adviser by the Long Credit Fund under the Investment Advisory Agreement are appropriate and within the range of fees that would have been negotiated at arm’s length.

The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Long Credit Fund grows and whether advisory fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Long Credit Fund’s investors. The Board considered that the Long Credit Fund’s fee arrangement with the Adviser involves both an advisory fee and an expense limitation agreement. The Board determined that, because the proposed advisory fee is flat and equals the expense cap under the ELA, the shareholders of the Long Credit Fund would benefit from the ELA. The Board noted that the Long Credit Fund has the potential to benefit from economies of scale under its agreements with its other service providers. Following further consideration of the Long Credit Fund’s projected asset levels, expectations for growth, and fee levels, the Board determined that the Long Credit Fund’s fee arrangement with the Adviser would provide benefits through the ELA, and that, at the Long Credit Fund’s current and projected asset levels for the next two years, the Long Credit Fund’s arrangements with the Adviser are fair and reasonable.

Brokerage and portfolio transactions. The Board considered the Adviser’s policies and procedures as it relates to seeking best execution for its clients, including the Long Credit Fund. The Board also considered the anticipated portfolio turnover rate for the Long Credit Fund; the method and basis for selecting and evaluating the broker-dealers used to complete the Long Credit Fund’s portfolio transactions; any anticipated allocation of portfolio business to persons affiliated with the Adviser; and the extent to which the Long Credit Fund’s trades may be allocated to soft-dollar arrangements. The Board determined that the Adviser’s practices regarding brokerage and portfolio transactions were satisfactory.

Possible conflicts of interest. In evaluating the possibility for conflicts of interest, the Board considered such matters as the Adviser’s process for allocating trades among its different clients, including both the Long Credit Fund and other clients with similar types of investment objectives and strategies as the Long Credit Fund. The Board also considered the substance and administration of the Adviser’s Code of Ethics. Following consideration of the foregoing, the Board determined that the Adviser’s standards and practices relating to the identification and mitigation of potential conflicts of interests were satisfactory.

Conclusion

After consideration of the above factors as well as other factors, the Board unanimously concluded that approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of the Long Credit Fund and its shareholders.

42

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party. Pursuant to Item 12(a)(1), a copy of registrant’s code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the code of ethics has not been amended, and the registrant has not granted any waivers, including implicit waivers, from the provisions of the code of ethics.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The registrant’s board of trustees has determined that the registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. The names of the audit committee financial experts are John C. Davis and David M. Deptula. Messrs. Davis and Deptula are “independent” for purposes of this Item.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $64,500 and $13,500 with respect to the registrant’s fiscal years ended November 30, 2015 and November 30, 2014, respectively.

(b) Audit-Related Fees. No fees were billed in the last fiscal year for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item.

(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $10,000 and $2,000 with respect to the registrant’s fiscal years ended November 30, 2015 and November 30, 2014, respectively. The services comprising these fees are the preparation of the registrant’s federal income and excise tax returns.

(d) All Other Fees. No fees were billed in the last fiscal year for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item.

(e)(1) The audit committee has not adopted pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(e)(2) None of the services described in paragraph (b) through (d) of this Item were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Less than 50% of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

(g) During the fiscal years ended November 30, 2015 and 2014, aggregate non-audit fees of $10,000 and $2,000, respectively, were billed by the registrant’s principal accountant for services rendered to the registrant. No non-audit fees were billed in the last fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for services rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.

(h) The principal accountant has not provided any non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable

Item 6. Schedule of Investments.

(a) Not applicable [schedule filed with Item 1]

(b) Not applicable

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The registrant’s Committee of Independent Trustees shall review shareholder recommendations for nominations to fill vacancies on the registrant’s board of trustees if such recommendations are submitted in writing and addressed to the Committee at the registrant’s offices. The Committee may adopt, by resolution, a policy regarding its procedures for considering candidates for the board of trustees, including any recommended by shareholders.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed and are operating effectively to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared, and that the information required in filings on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.

(a)(1) Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Attached hereto

(a)(2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)): Attached hereto

(a)(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons: Not applicable

(b) Certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)): Attached hereto

Exhibit 99.CODE ETH Code of Ethics

Exhibit 99.CERT Certifications required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act

Exhibit 99.906CERT Certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant)		Ultimus Managers Trust
By (Signature and Title)*		/s/ Frank L. Newbauer
		Frank L. Newbauer, Assistant Secretary
Date		February 5, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)*		/s/ Andrew B. Wellington
		Andrew B. Wellington, Principal Executive Officer of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund
Date	February 5, 2016
By (Signature and Title)*		/s/ Stephen P. Lack
		Stephen P. Lack, Principal Executive Officer of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund
Date	February 5, 2016
By (Signature and Title)*		/s/ David R. Carson
		David R. Carson, Principal Executive Officer of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund
Date	February 5, 2016
By (Signature and Title)*		/s/ Jennifer L. Leamer
		Jennifer L. Leamer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
Date	February 5, 2016

^* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.

EX-99.CODE ETH

CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS

I.Covered Officers/Purpose of the Code

The code of ethics (this “Code”) for Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Trust”) applies to the Trust’s Principal Executive Officer(s) and Principal Financial Officer(s) (the “Covered Officers,” each of whom is set forth in Exhibit A) for the purpose of promoting:

· honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

· full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Trust files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in other public communications made by the Trust;

· compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations;

· the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and

· accountability for adherence to the Code.

Each Covered Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.

II. Covered Officers Should Handle Ethically Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest

Overview. A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s private interests interfere with the interests of, or his service to, the Trust. For example, a conflict of interest would arise if a Covered Officer, or a member of his family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his position with the Trust.

Certain conflicts of interest arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Trust and already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("Investment Company Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“Investment Advisers Act”). For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property, other than shares of beneficial interest of the Trust) with the Trust because of their status as “affiliated persons” of the Trust. The compliance programs and procedures of the Trust or the Trust's investment advisers (the "investment advisers") are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions. This Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace these programs and procedures, and such conflicts fall outside of the parameters of this Code.

Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts may arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between the Trust and an investment adviser or a third party service provider of which a Covered Officer is also an officer or employee. As a result, this Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for the Trust and/or for the investment adviser or third party service provider) be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects on the investment adviser(s) or third party service provider and the Trust. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between the Trust and the investment adviser or third party service provider and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Trust. The foregoing activities, if performed in conformity with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, will be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) that the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees of one or more investment companies covered by other codes.

Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. The following list provides examples of conflicts of interest under the Code, but the Covered Officers should keep in mind that these examples are not exhaustive. The overarching principle is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed improperly before the interest of the Trust.

Each Covered Officer must:

· not use personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting by the Trust whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Trust;

· not cause the Trust to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than the benefit of the Trust;

· not use material non-public knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for the Trust to trade personally or cause others to trade personally in contemplation of the market effect of such transactions; and

· report at least annually any affiliations or other relationships that could potentially present a conflict of interest with the Trust.

There are some conflict of interest situations that should always be discussed with the Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust (the “CCO”), who may choose to seek the assistance of legal counsel to the Trust (“Trust Counsel”), if such situations might have a material adverse effect on the Trust. Examples of these include:

· service as a director on the board of any public company;

· the receipt of non-nominal gifts from affiliates of the Fund or the Fund’s service providers;

· the receipt of entertainment from any company with which the Trust has current or prospective business dealings, including investments in such companies, unless such entertainment is business-related, reasonable in cost, appropriate as to time and place, and not so frequent as to raise any questions of impropriety;

2

· any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of the Trust’s service providers, other than its investment advisers, principal underwriter, administrator or any affiliated person thereof; and

· a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges or spreads paid by the Trust for effecting portfolio transactions, including but not limited to certain soft dollar arrangements, or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Covered Officer’s employment, such as compensation or equity ownership.

III.Disclosure and Compliance

· each Covered Officer shall become familiar with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Trust;

· each Covered Officer shall not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about the Trust to others, whether within or outside the Trust, including to the Trust’s management and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations;

· each Covered Officer may, to the extent appropriate within the Covered Officer's area of responsibility and to the extent deemed necessary in the sole discretion of the Covered Officer, consult with other officers and employees of the Trust and the investment advisers and the Trust’s administrator with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Trust files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Trust; and

· it is the responsibility of each Covered Officer to promote Trust compliance with the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

IV.Reporting and Accountability

Each Covered Officer must:

· upon adoption of the Code (or thereafter as applicable, upon becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing to the Board that the Covered Officer has received, read and understands this Code;

· annually thereafter affirm to the Board that the Covered Officer has complied with the requirements of this Code;

· not retaliate against any other Covered Officer or any employee of the Trust or its affiliated persons for reports of potential violations of this Code that are made in good faith; and

· notify the CCO promptly if the Covered Officer knows of any violation of this Code. Failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code.

3

The CCO may seek the advise of Trust Counsel regarding specific situations in which questions are presented under the Code and the CCO has the authority to interpret this Code in any particular situation. However, any approvals or waivers¹ will be considered by the Board.

The Trust will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing this Code:

· the CCO shall (with the assistance of Trust Counsel if requested) take all appropriate action to investigate any reported potential violations;

· if, after such investigation, the CCO believes that no violation has occurred, then no further action is required;

· any matter that the CCO believes may be a violation shall be reported to the Trustees of the Trust who are not "interested persons," as defined by Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act, of the Trust (the "Independent Trustees");

· if the Independent Trustees concur that a violation may have occurred, it will inform and make a recommendation to the Board, which will consider appropriate action, which may include a review of, and appropriate modifications to, applicable Trust policies and procedures; notification to appropriate personnel or the board of the investment adviser or other relevant service provider; or a recommendation to dismiss the Covered Officer;

· the Board will be responsible for granting waivers, as appropriate; and

· any changes to or waivers of this Code will, to the extent required, be disclosed as provided by SEC rules.

V.Other Policies and Procedures

This Code shall be the sole code of ethics adopted by the Trust for purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder. Insofar as other policies or procedures of the Trust, the Trust’s advisers, principal underwriter, or other service providers govern or purport to govern the behavior or activities of the Covered Officers who are subject to this Code, they are superseded by this Code to the extent that they overlap or conflict with the provisions of this Code. The Trust’s and the investment advisers’ and the principal underwriter’s codes of ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act are separate requirements applying to the Covered Officers and others, and are not part of this Code.

VI.Amendments

Any amendments to this Code, other than amendments to Exhibit A, must be approved or ratified by a majority vote of the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees.

¹ For this purpose, the term "waiver" includes the approval by the Trust of a material departure from a provision of this Code or the Trust's failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a provision of this Code that has been made known to the Trust's management.

4

VII.Confidentiality

All reports and records of the Trust prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law or regulation or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than an investment adviser to any series of the Trust to which such reports or records relate, the Board, the CCO and Trust Counsel.

VIII.Internal Use

The Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Trust and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of the Trust, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.

Date: June 5, 2012

5

Exhibit A

Effective September 2015

Persons Covered by this Code of Ethics

Alambic Small Cap Value Plus Fund

Robert T. Slaymaker, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

APEXcm Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund

Nitin Kumbhani, PEO

Mike D. Kalbfleisch, Vice President

Jenny Leamer, PFO

Barrow All Cap Core Fund

Barrow All Cap Long/Short Fund

Nicholas Chermayeff, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

Cincinnati Asset Management Funds: Broad Market Strategic Income Fund

Bill Sloneker, PEO

David Mencer, Vice President

Jenny Leamer, PFO

Blue Current Global Dividend Fund

Harry Jones, PEO

Jenny Leamer PFO

Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund

Stephen Lack, PEO

Jenny Leamer PFO

Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund

Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund

Andrew Wellington, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

6

Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund

Dave Carson, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

Topturn OneEighty Fund

Daniel Darchuck, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund

Andrew Dassori, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

Waycross Long/Short Equity Fund

Benjamin H. Thomas, PEO

Jenny Leamer, PFO

7

CODE OF ETHICS

FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE

AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

As a Covered Officer as defined in the Code of Ethics For Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers of Ultimus Managers Trust (the “Code”), I hereby certify that I have received and have read and fully understand the Code, and I recognize that I am subject to the Code. I further certify that I will comply with the requirements of the Code.

Signature

Name (Please Print)

Date

8

EX-99.CERT

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew B. Wellington, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund:

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the schedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is filed;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2016	/s/ Andrew B. Wellington
	Andrew B. Wellington, Principal Executive Officer of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stephen P. Lack, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the schedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is filed;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2016	/s/ Stephen P. Lack
	Stephen P. Lack, Principal Executive Officer of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David R. Carson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the schedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is filed;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2016	/s/ David R. Carson
	David R. Carson, Principal Executive Officer of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jennifer L. Leamer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Ultimus Managers Trust:

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the schedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all material respects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarter for which the report is filed;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2016	/s/ Jennifer L. Leamer
	Jennifer L. Leamer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer

EX-99.906 CERT

EX-99.906CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

Andrew B. Wellington, Chief Executive Officer, and Jennifer L. Leamer, Chief Financial Officer, of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund (the “Registrant”), each certify to the best of his/her knowledge that:

1. The Registrant’s periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2015 (the “Form N-CSR”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER	CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Ultimus Managers Trust	Ultimus Managers Trust
/s/ Andrew B. Wellington	/s/ Jennifer L. Leamer
Andrew B. Wellington, Principal Executive Officer of Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund and Lyrical U.S. Hedged Value Fund	Jennifer L. Leamer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
Date: February 5, 2016	Date: February 5, 2016

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Cutler Trust and will be retained by The Cutler Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed with the Commission.

EX-99.906CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

Stephen P. Lack, Chief Executive Officer, and Jennifer L. Leamer, Chief Financial Officer, of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund (the “Registrant”), each certify to the best of his/her knowledge that:

1. The Registrant’s periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2015 (the “Form N-CSR”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER	CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Ultimus Managers Trust	Ultimus Managers Trust
/s/ Stephen P. Lack	/s/ Jennifer L. Leamer
Stephen P. Lack, Principal Executive Officer of Galapagos Partners Select Equity Fund	Jennifer L. Leamer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
Date: February 5, 2016	Date: February 5, 2016

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The Cutler Trust and will be retained by The Cutler Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed with the Commission.

EX-99.906CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

David R. Carson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jennifer L. Leamer, Chief Financial Officer, of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund (the “Registrant”), each certify to the best of his/her knowledge that:

1. The Registrant’s periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended November 30, 2015 (the “Form N-CSR”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER	CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Ultimus Managers Trust	Ultimus Managers Trust
/s/ David R. Carson	/s/ Jennifer L. Leamer
David R. Carson, Principal Executive Officer of Ryan Labs Core Bond Fund and Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund	Jennifer L. Leamer, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
Date: February 5, 2016	Date: February 5, 2016

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ultimus Managers Trust and will be retained by Ultimus Managers Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed with the Commission.