UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended May 31, 2014

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from            to    

Commission File Number: 1-35447

NOVACOPPER INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

British Columbia	98-1006991
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)
Suite 1950, 777 Dunsmuir Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada	V7Y 1K4
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(604) 638-8088
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]      No [   ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]      No [   ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [   ]	Accelerated filer [X]	Non-accelerated filer [   ]	Smaller reporting company [   ]
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting
		company)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [   ]      No [X]

As of July 7, 2014, the registrant had 60,229,697 Common Shares, no par value, outstanding.

NOVACOPPER INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		2
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	22
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	23
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		24
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	24
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	24
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	24
Item 5.	Other Information	24
Item 6.	Exhibits	24

ii

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NovaCopper Inc.
(An Exploration-Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)

in thousands of dollars
	May 31, 2014		November 30, 2013
	$		$
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	2,083		6,484
Accounts receivable	253		90
Deposits and prepaid amounts	623		591
	2,959		7,165
Plant and equipment (note 3)	683		1,148
Mineral properties and development costs (note 4)	30,586		30,586
	34,228		38,899
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 5)	1,510		1,742
	1,510		1,742
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital (note 6) – unlimited common shares authorized, no par value Issued -53,707,957 (2013 – 53,066,656)	106,640		104,895
Contributed surplus	124		152
Contributed surplus – options (note 6(a,b))	16,666		17,248
Contributed surplus – units (note 6(c))	1,717		2,584
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage	(92,429	)	(87,722	)
	32,718		37,157
	34,228		38,899

Nature of operations, going concern, structure and plan of arrangement (note 1)
Commitments and contingencies (notes 4, 6, 9)
Subsequent event (note 10)

(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)

/s/ Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse, Director	/s/ Kalidas Madhavpeddi, Director
Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors

2

NovaCopper Inc.
(An Exploration-Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
(unaudited)

in thousands of dollars, except share and per share amounts
	For the three months ended				For the six months ended				Cumulative
									during
									exploration
	May 31, 2014		May 31, 2013		May 31, 2014		May 31, 2013		stage
	$		$		$		$		$
Expenses
Amortization	208		254		466		504		2,551
Corporate development	12		36		43		140		661
Foreign exchange (gain) loss	16		6		10		(18	)	28
General and administrative	457		616		894		1,164		7,214
Mineral properties expense (note 4(c))	489		2,231		1,069		3,033		52,326
Professional fees	176		211		826		510		2,529
Salaries	600		602		1,149		1,150		6,782
Salaries – stock-based compensation (note 6)	135		2,000		251		6,113		17,887
Total expenses	2,093		5,956		4,708		12,596		89,978
Other items
Accretion expense	-		-		-		-		2,530
Loss on disposal of equipment	-		-		-		-		7
Interest and other income	-		(9	)	(1	)	(23	)	(86	)
Loss and comprehensive loss for the period	(2,093	)	(5,947	)	(4,707	)	(12,573	)	(92,429	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$0.04		$0.11		$0.09		$0.26
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	53,637,801		52,769,927		53,572,942		48,588,311

(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)

3

NovaCopper Inc.
(An Exploration -Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
(unaudited)

in thousands of dollars, except share amounts
					Contributed						Total
	Number of		Contributed		surplus –		Contributed				shareholders’
	shares	Share capital	surplus		options		surplus – units		Deficit		equity
	outstanding	$	$		$		$		$		$
Balance – November 30, 2012	46,665,069	92,168	12,180		12,703		-		(63,328	)	53,723
Vesting of NovaGold Performance Share Units and Deferred Share Units	16,586	33	(33	)	-		-		-		-
Exercise of NovaGold Warrants	6,088,262	11,996	(11,996	)	-		-		-		-
Exercise of NovaGold Arrangement options	1,184	11	-		(11	)	-		-		-
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-		3,310		1,683		-		4,993
Loss for the period	-	-	-		-		-		(12,573	)	(12,573	)
Balance – May 31, 2013	52,771,101	104,208	151		16,002		1,683		(75,901	)	46,143
Balance – November 30, 2013	53,066,656	104,895	152		17,248		2,584		(87,722	)	37,157
Exercise of NovaGold Arrangement options	46,929	632	-		(615	)	-		-		17
Vesting of NovaGold Performance Share Units	14,166	28	(28	)	-		-		-		-
Vesting of Restricted Share Units	425,833	803	-		-		(803	)	-		-
Vesting of Deferred Share Units	154,373	282	-		-		(282	)	-		-
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-		33		218		-		251
Loss for the period	-	-	-		-		-		(4,707	)	(4,707	)
Balance – May 31, 2014	53,707,957	106,640	124		16,666		1,717		(92,429	)	32,718

(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)

4

NovaCopper Inc.
(An Exploration-Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)

in thousands of dollars
	For the three months ended				For the six months ended				Cumulative
									during
									exploration
	May 31, 2014		May 31, 2013		May 31, 2014		May 31, 2013		stage
	$		$		$		$		$
Cash flows used in operating activities
Loss for the period	(2,093	)	(5,947	)	(4,707	)	(12,573	)	(92,429	)
Items not affecting cash
Amortization	208		254		466		504		2,571
Accretion	-		-		-		-		2,530
Loss on disposal of equipment	-		-		-		-		7
Issuance of shares as	-		-		-		-		316
compensation
Stock-based compensation	135		2,000		251		6,113		18,999
Unrealized foreign exchange	-		2		-		(77	)	(89	)
Net change in non-cash working capital
Increase in accounts receivable	(112	)	(77	)	(163	)	(13	)	(253	)
Increase in deposits and prepaid amounts	(165	)	(274	)	(32	)	(228	)	(610	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and due to related parties	(254	)	1,148		(232	)	(111	)	1,436
	(2,281	)	(2,894	)	(4,417	)	(6,385	)	(67,522	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds received on exercise of options	-		-		17		-		36
Funding provided by NovaGold on the completion of the Plan of Arrangement	-		-		-		-		40,000
Funding provided and expenses paid by NovaGold	-		-		-		-		61,256
Repayment of notes payable	-		-		-		-		(24,000	)
Settlement of Restricted Share Units	-		-		-		-		(329	)
	-		-		17		-		76,963
Cash flows used in investing activities
Acquisition of plant & equipment	-		(158	)	(1	)	(172	)	(3,242	)
Acquisition of mineral properties	-		-		-		-		(4,116	)
	-		(158	)	(1	)	(172	)	(7,358	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(2,281	)	(3,052	)	(4,401	)	(6,557	)	2,083
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period	4,364		18,739		6,484		22,244		-
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period	2,083		15,687		2,083		15,687		2,083

(See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial statements)

5

NovaCopper Inc.
(An Exploration-Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1     Nature of operations, going concern, structure and plan of arrangement

NovaCopper Inc. (“NovaCopper” or the “Company”) was incorporated in British Columbia under the Business Corporations Act (BC) on April 27, 2011. The Company is engaged in the exploration and development of mineral properties including the Arctic and Bornite Projects located in Northwest Alaska in the United States of America (“US”).

Structure and plan of arrangement

On January 11, 2010, Alaska Gold Company (“AGC”), at the time a wholly owned subsidiary of NovaGold Resources Inc. (“NovaGold”), purchased 100% of the Ambler lands, hosting the copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project, for consideration of $29 million. The Ambler lands were acquired on October 17, 2011 by NovaCopper US Inc. (“NovaCopper US”) through a purchase and sale agreement with AGC. On October 24, 2011, NovaGold transferred its ownership of NovaCopper US to NovaCopper, then a wholly owned subsidiary of NovaGold, in exchange for 100 shares of NovaCopper, with an ascribed value of $27.3 million.

On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper US acquired the exclusive right to explore the Bornite lands and lands deeded to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. (“NANA”) through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (“ANCSA”) located adjacent to the Ambler lands to create the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects (“UKMP Projects”).

Where applicable, these consolidated financial statements reflect the statements of loss and comprehensive loss, and cash flows of the Arctic Project as if NovaCopper had been an independent operation from inception. The cumulative statements of loss and comprehensive loss include exploration costs of the Arctic Project and an allocation of NovaGold’s general and administrative costs incurred on the basis of time committed by NovaGold staff to AGC and the ratio of expenses incurred on the Arctic Project as compared to all costs incurred by AGC in the respective period.

The Arctic Project’s opening deficit has been calculated by applying the same allocation principles described above to the cumulative transactions relating to the project from the date of its initial option in 2004 and includes an allocation of NovaGold’s general and administrative expenses from the date of acquisition. Prior to the acquisition in 2010, NovaGold held an option to earn a 51% interest in the property which was terminated upon entering into the purchase and sale agreement. All historical spending prior to April 30, 2012 was funded by NovaGold.

Going concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As at May 31, 2014, the Company had consolidated cash of $2.1 million and working capital of $1.4 million. Subsequent to May 31, 2014, the Company raised $7.5 million through a private placement which is restricted to fund general and administrative expenses and program expenditures within the next twelve months as discussed in note 10. Substantial doubt exists as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as the continued operations and exploration activities of the Company are dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing to fund operations. The Company will need to raise additional funds to support further exploration of its projects and administration expenses. Future financings are anticipated through equity financing, debt financing, convertible debt, or other means. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional financing, that sufficient funds will be available to the Company, or be available on favourable terms, in the future. Factors that could affect the availability of financing include fluctuations in the Company's share price, the state of international debt and equity markets, investor perceptions and expectations, global financial and metals markets, and progress on the Company's exploration properties. These financial statements do not reflect the adjustments in the carrying value of the assets and liabilities, the reported expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used that would be necessary if the Company was unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations. Such adjustments could be material.

6

2     Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of NovaCopper and its wholly-owned subsidiary, NovaCopper US. All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated on consolidation. These financial statements were approved by the Company’s Audit Committee on behalf of the Board of Directors for issue on July 7, 2014.

All figures are in United States dollars unless otherwise noted.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position as of May 31, 2014, our results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, and our cash flows for the three and six months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013. The results of operations for the three and six months ended May 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending November 30, 2014.

As these interim consolidated financial statements do not contain all of the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2013 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on January 30, 2014.

Recent accounting pronouncements

i.	Income tax disclosure
	The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” (“ASU 2013-11”) which amended Topic 740, Income Taxes to provide guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. It was released to provide clear guidance to minimize divergence in practice when disclosing unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013. We adopted this standard for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have any impact as our disclosure meets the recommended practice.
ii.	Offsetting assets and liabilities
	In January 2013, the FASB issued “Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2013-01”). ASU 2013-01 clarifies Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11: “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”) to restrict the scope of implementation to derivatives accounted for under Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which includes bifurcated embedded derivatives repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that require an offset or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. ASU 2013-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. We adopted this standard for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
iii.	Development stage entity
	In June 2014, the FASB issued “Development Stage Entities – Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation” (“ASU 2014-10”). ASU 2014-10 eliminates the concept of a development stage entity, of which NovaCopper had been classified. As a result of the elimination, certain financial reporting disclosures have been eliminated as well, including the presentation of an inception-to-date statement of income and cash flow. ASU 2014-10 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption of this standard is permitted, and we expect to adopt for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is expected to have an impact on the disclosure and presentation of our statement of loss and comprehensive loss and the statement of cash flows as it will no longer include the cumulative during exploration stage column currently presented.

7

3     Plant and equipment

in thousands of dollars
				May 31, 2014
		Accumulated
	Cost	amortization		Net
	$	$		$
British Columbia, Canada
Furniture and equipment	46	(10	)	36
Leasehold improvements	32	(9	)	23
Computer hardware and software	81	(30	)	51
Alaska, USA
Machinery and equipment	2,833	(2,354	)	479
Vehicles	275	(182	)	93
Computer hardware and software	31	(30	)	1
	3,298	(2,615	)	683

in thousands of dollars
				November 30, 2013
		Accumulated
	Cost	amortization		Net
	$	$		$
British Columbia, Canada
Furniture and equipment	46	(5	)	41
Leasehold improvements	32	(5	)	27
Computer hardware and software	80	(17	)	63
Alaska, USA
Machinery and equipment	2,833	(1,949	)	884
Vehicles	275	(144	)	131
Computer hardware and software	31	(29	)	2
	3,297	(2,149	)	1,148

4     Mineral properties and development costs

in thousands of dollars
	November 30, 2013	Acquisition costs	May 31, 2014
Alaska, USA	$	$	$
Ambler (a)	26,586	-	26,586
Bornite (b)	4,000	-	4,000
	30,586	-	30,586

in thousands of dollars
	November 30, 2012	Acquisition costs	November 30, 2013
Alaska, USA	$	$	$
Ambler (a)	26,586	-	26,586
Bornite (b)	4,000	-	4,000
	30,586	-	30,586

(a)	Ambler
	On January 11, 2010, NovaGold, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 100% of the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska, which contains the copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project and other mineralized targets within the volcanogenic massive sulfide belt. As consideration, NovaGold, issued 931,098 shares with a fair value of $5.0 million and agreed to make two cash payments to the vendor of $12.0 million each in January 2011 and January 2012, for total consideration of $29.0 million. The fair value of these cash payments were $11.1 million and $10.3 million, respectively, at the transaction date valued using a discount rate of approximately 8%. The January 2011 payment was made by NovaGold on January 7, 2011 and the January 2012 payment was made by NovaGold in advance on August 5, 2011. Total fair value of the consideration was $26.5 million, including transaction costs associated with the acquisition of $0.1 million. The vendor retained a 1% net smelter return royalty that the owner of the property can purchase at any time for a one-time payment of $10.0 million.
	Prior to the acquisition in 2010, NovaGold held an option to earn a 51% interest in the property which was terminated upon entering into the purchase and sale agreement.

8

As discussed in note 1, the property was acquired on October 17, 2011 by NovaCopper US through a purchase and sale agreement with AGC.

(b)	Bornite
	On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper US acquired the exclusive right to explore and the non-exclusive right to access and enter on the Bornite lands and lands deeded to NANA through the ANCSA, located adjacent to the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska. As consideration, NovaCopper US paid $4 million to acquire the right to explore and develop the combined Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects through an Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease with NANA. NANA also has the right to appoint a member to NovaCopper’s board of directors within a five year period following our public listing on a stock exchange. Upon a decision to proceed with construction of a mine on the lands, NANA maintains the right to purchase between a 16%-25% ownership interest in the mine or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after NovaCopper has recovered certain historical costs, capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest, consideration will be payable equal to all historical costs incurred on the properties at the elected percentage purchased less $40 million, not to be less than zero. The parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs, including capital costs of the mine based on their pro-rata share.
	NANA would also be granted a net smelter return royalty of between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the percent which is determined by the classification of land from which production originates.
(c)	Mineral properties expense
	The following table summarizes mineral properties expense for the three and six months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013.

in thousands of dollars
		Three months ended		Six months ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
	$	$	$	$
Community	23	28	34	43
Drilling	-	400	-	400
Engineering	27	620	102	750
Environmental	-	27	15	27
Geochemistry and geophysics	-	18	-	67
Land and permitting	96	74	189	192
Project support	75	588	146	680
Wages and benefits	268	476	583	874
Mineral property expense	489	2,231	1,069	3,033

Mineral property expenses consist of direct drilling, personnel, community, resource reporting and other exploration expenses as outlined above, as well as indirect project support expenses such as fixed wing charters, helicopter support, fuel, and other camp operation costs. Cumulative mineral properties expense from the initial earn-in agreement on the property in 2004 to May 31, 2014 is $52.3 million.

5     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

in thousands of dollars
	May 31, 2014	November 30, 2013
	$	$
Trade accounts payable	27	196
Accrued liabilities	626	427
Accrued salaries and vacation	857	1,119
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,510	1,742

Accrued liabilities include $70,000 of accrued and unpaid directors’ meeting fees relating to services provided during the six months ended May 31, 2014 and $83,000 relating to services provided during the year ended November 30, 2013. Accrued salaries and vacation include $699,000 of accrued and unpaid bonuses relating to services provided by officers during the year ended November 30, 2013 payable upon the completion of a financing of greater than $10 million.

9

6     Share capital

Authorized:
   unlimited common shares, no par value

in thousands of dollars, except share amounts
	Number of shares	Ascribed value
		$
November 30, 2012	46,665,069	92,168
Exercise of NovaGold Warrants	6,088,262	11,996
Exercise of NovaGold Arrangement Options	52,243	254
Vesting of NovaGold Performance and Deferred Share Units	16,586	32
Vesting of Restricted Share Units	244,496	445
November 30, 2013	53,066,656	104,895
Exercise of NovaGold Arrangement Options	46,929	632
Vesting of NovaGold Performance Share Units	14,166	28
Vesting of Restricted Share Units	425,833	803
Vesting of Deferred Share Units	154,373	282
May 31, 2014, issued and outstanding	53,707,957	106,640

On April 30, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), under the Plan of Arrangement, NovaGold distributed its interest in NovaCopper to the shareholders of NovaGold on the basis that each shareholder received one share in NovaCopper for every six shares of NovaGold held on the record date. NovaCopper committed to issue up to 6,181,352 common shares to satisfy holders of NovaGold warrants (“NovaGold Warrants”), performance share units (“NovaGold PSUs”) and deferred share units (“NovaGold DSUs”) on record as of the close of business April 27, 2012 on the same basis as NovaGold shareholders under the Plan of Arrangement. When a warrant is exercised or a unit becomes vested, NovaCopper has committed to deliver one common share to the holder for every six shares of NovaGold the holder is entitled to receive, rounded down to the nearest whole number. An amount of $12.2 million was recorded in contributed surplus representing a pro-rated amount of the historical NovaGold investment based on the fully diluted number of common shares at the Effective Date.

During the period ended May 31, 2014, the Company issued 14,166 common shares in settlement of NovaGold PSUs which vested on January 29, 2014 (May 31, 2013 – 14,180 common shares).

As of May 31, 2014, 20,685 NovaGold DSUs remain outstanding, which will settle upon the NovaGold directors’ retirement.

(a) Stock options

No stock options were granted during the period ended May 31, 2014.

For the six month period ended May 31, 2014, NovaCopper recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.02 million for options granted to directors, employees and services providers, net of forfeitures.

A summary of the Company’s stock option plan and changes during the period ended is as follows:

			May 31, 2014
			Weighted average
			exercise price
	Number of options		$
Balance – beginning of period	168,332		1.75
Forfeited	(13,332	)	2.34
Balance – end of period	155,000		1.70

The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at May 31, 2014.

		Stock options - outstanding		Stock options - exercisable
			Weighted		Weighted
	Number of	Weighted	average	Number of	average
	outstanding	average years	exercise price	exercisable	exercise price
Range of price	options	to expiry	$	options	$
$ 1.63 to $ 1.83	155,000	3.44	1.70	51,666	1.70
	155,000	3.69	1.70	51,666	1.70

10

(b) NovaGold Arrangement Options

Under the Plan of Arrangement, holders of NovaGold stock options received one option in NovaCopper for every six options held in NovaGold (“NovaGold Arrangement Options”). The exercise price of the options in NovaCopper was determined based on the relative fair values of NovaCopper and NovaGold based on the volume weighted-average trading prices on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five trading days commencing on the sixth trading day following the Effective Date. All other terms of the options remained the same. A total of 2,189,040 NovaGold Arrangement options were granted under the Plan of Arrangement on April 30, 2012. No future stock options granted by NovaGold are subject to the Plan of Arrangement.

For the six month period ended May 31, 2014, NovaCopper recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.01 million for NovaGold Arrangement Options, net of forfeitures.

A summary of the NovaGold Arrangement Options and changes during the period ended is as follows:

			May 31, 2014
			Weighted average
			exercise price
	Number of options		$
Balance – beginning of period	1,709,503		4.00
Exercised	(212,075	)	1.21
Expired	(472,931	)	2.72
Forfeited	(236,569	)	4.97
Balance – end of period	787,928		5.22

The following table summarizes information about the NovaGold Arrangement Options outstanding at May 31, 2014.

		Stock options - outstanding		Stock options - exercisable
			Weighted		Weighted
	Number of	Weighted	average	Number of	average
	outstanding	average years	exercise price	exercisable	exercise price
Range of price	options	to expiry	$	options	$
$ 2.00 to $ 3.99	172,093	1.32	3.29	166,537	3.27
$ 4.00 to $ 5.99	399,059	2.39	5.06	339,894	5.24
$ 6.00 to $ 7.99	216,776	1.72	7.06	216,776	7.06
	787,928	1.97	5.22	723,207	5.33

(c) Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) and Deferred Share Units (“DSUs”)

On December 5, 2012, 1,295,500 RSUs were granted to employees and officers vesting equally in thirds on June 5, 2013, December 5, 2013, and December 5, 2014. 750,000 DSUs that were granted to directors vested immediately and are to be paid out at the time of retirement from NovaCopper.

All non-executive directors have elected to receive 50% of their annual retainer in DSUs effective January 1, 2014.

A summary of the Company’s unit plans and changes during the period ended is as follows:

	Number of RSUs		Number of DSUs
Balance – beginning of period	851,673		750,000
Granted	-		22,564
Vested/paid	(425,833	)	(154,373	)
Forfeited	(3,500	)	-
Balance – end of period	422,340		618,191

For the six months ended May 31, 2014, NovaCopper recognized a stock-based compensation charge of $0.2 million for units granted to employees and directors, net of forfeitures.

On May 21, 2014, 78,712 DSUs were redeemed and paid out in common shares upon the resignation of a director.

11

7     Management of capital risk

The Company relies upon management to manage capital in order to accomplish the objectives of safeguarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the development of its mineral properties and maintain a capital structure which optimizes the costs of capital at an acceptable risk (note 1). The Company’s current capital consists of equity funding through capital markets and funding received from its prior owner, NovaGold, prior to its public listing.

As the Company is currently in the exploration phase none of its financial instruments are exposed to commodity price risk; however, the Company’s ability to obtain long-term financing and its economic viability may be affected by commodity price volatility.

To facilitate the management of its capital requirements, the Company prepares annual expenditure budgets that are updated as necessary depending on various factors, including successful capital deployment and general industry conditions.

8     Financial instruments

The Company is exposed to a variety of risks arising from financial instruments. These risks and management’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing these risks are disclosed as follows.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The fair value of accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates their carrying value due to the short-term nature of their maturity. All of the Company’s financial instruments are initially measured at fair value and then held at amortized cost.

Financial risk management

The Company’s activities expose them to certain financial risks, including currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest risk and price risk.

(a) Currency risk

Currency risk is the risk of a fluctuation in financial asset and liability settlement amounts due to a change in foreign exchange rates. The Company operates in the United States and Canada with some expenses incurred in Canadian dollars. The Company’s exposure is limited to cash of CDN$40,000, accounts receivable of CDN$34,000 and accounts payable of CDN$180,000. Based on a 10% change in the US-Canadian exchange rate, assuming all other variables remain constant, the Company’s net loss would change by approximately $10,000.

(b) Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company holds cash and cash equivalents with Canadian Chartered financial institutions which are composed of financial instruments issued by Canadian banks. The Company’s accounts receivable consist of GST receivable from the Federal Government of Canada and receivables due for camp and management services provided to other parties. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is equal to the balance of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable as recorded in the financial statements.

(c) Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulties raising funds to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company is in the exploration stage and does not have cash inflows from operations; therefore, the Company manages liquidity risk through the management of its capital structure and financial leverage as outlined in notes 1 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

12

Contractually obligated cash flow requirements as at May 31, 2014 are as follows.

				in thousands of dollars
	Total	< 1 Year	1–2 Years	2–5 Years	Thereafter
	$	$	$	$	$
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,510	1,510	-	-	-
Office lease	539	87	371	81	-
	2,049	1,597	371	81	-

(d) Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company holds excess cash balances in money market funds which limits the risk of loss due to interest rate changes to $nil.

9     Commitment

On January 25, 2013, the Company entered into a commitment to lease office space effective May 1, 2013 for a period of four years. The future minimum lease payments as at May 31, 2014 are approximately as follows.

	in thousands of dollars
	May 31, 2014
	$
2014	87
2015	180
2016	191
2017	81
Total	539

10     Subsequent event

On July 1, 2014, the Company announced that it has entered into definitive agreements with existing shareholders to complete a non-brokered private placement offering of $7,500,000 in Units. Each Unit will be priced at $1.15 per Unit and will consist of one common share of the Company and one common share purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $1.60 per share for a period of five years from the closing date. The proceeds raised are restricted for 12 months following closing to a maximum of $4.0 million on general and administrative expenses, $2.7 million on program expenditures, and $0.8 million on additional expenses incurred in reducing annual general and administrative expenses.

13

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary notes

Forward-looking statements

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and other applicable securities laws. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding the perceived merit of properties, exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource estimates, work programs, capital expenditures, operating costs, cash flow estimates, production estimates and similar statements relating to the economic viability of a project, timelines, strategic plans, including the Company’s plans and expectations relating to its Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects, completion of transactions, market prices for precious and base metals, or other statements that are not statements of fact. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of Management. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute “forward-looking statements” to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed.

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”, “potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material assumptions, including those listed below, which could prove to be significantly incorrect:

• assumptions made in the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of the Company’s mineral deposits;

• our ability to achieve production at any of the Company’s mineral exploration and development properties;

• estimated capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;

• estimated metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs, together with other assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates;

• our expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure and that the cost of doing so will be reasonable;

• assumptions that all necessary permits and governmental approvals will be obtained;

• our ability to continue our good relationship with local communities and other stakeholders;

• our expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labour and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties; and

• assumptions that our activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by development, operating or regulatory risks.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

•	risks related to inability to define proven and probable reserves and the fact that none of the Company’s mineral properties are in production or under development;
•	uncertainties relating to the assumptions underlying the Company’s resource estimates, such as metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs;
•	risks related to uncertainty of whether there will ever be production at the Company’s mineral exploration and development properties;
•	risks related to the Company’s ability to commence production and generate material revenues or obtain adequate financing for its planned exploration and development activities;
•	risks related to the Company’s ability to finance its planned exploration activities at its mineral properties or to complete further exploration programs;
•	risks related to the Company’s ability to finance the development of its mineral properties through external financing, strategic alliances, the sale of property interests or otherwise;
•	commodity price fluctuations;
	risks related to market events and general economic conditions;
•	uncertainty of estimates of capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;

14

•	risks related to lack of infrastructure, specifically a lack of road access to the UKMP Project site;
•	risks related to inclement weather which may delay or hinder exploration activities at its mineral properties;
•	the Company’s history of losses and expectation of future losses;
•	risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results and the geology, grade and continuity of the Company’s mineral deposits;
•	uncertainty related to inferred mineral resources;
•	uncertainty related to the economic projections derived from the PEA;
•	risks related to the third parties on which the Company depends for its exploration and development activities;
•	mining and development risks, including risks related to infrastructure, accidents, equipment breakdowns, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in development, construction or production;
•	credit, liquidity, interest rate and currency risks;
•	uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights;
•	risks related to increases in demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties, and related cost increases;
•	the risk that permits and governmental approvals necessary to develop and operate mines on the Company’s properties will not be available on a timely basis or at all;
•	risks related to governmental regulation and permits, including environmental regulation;
•	risks related to the need for reclamation activities on the Company’s properties and uncertainty of cost estimates related thereto;
•	uncertainty related to title to the Company’s mineral properties;
•	risks related to competition in the acquisition of mineral properties;
•	risks inherent in the acquisition of new properties including unknown liabilities;
•	the Company’s need to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel;
•	risks related to conflicts of interests of some of the directors of the Company;
•	risks related to potential future litigation;
•	risks related to global climate change;
	risks related to adverse publicity from non-governmental organizations;
•	risks related to future sales or issuances of equity securities decreasing the value of existing common shares, diluting voting power and reducing future earnings per share;
•	uncertainty as to the volatility in the price of the Company’s shares;
•	the Company’s expectation of not paying cash dividends;
•	adverse federal income tax consequences for U.S. shareholders should the Company be a passive foreign investment company;
•	risks related to the Company’s majority shareholder;
•	uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to maintain the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting as per the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and
•	increased regulatory compliance costs relating to the Dodd-Frank Act.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in NovaCopper’s Form 10-K dated January 29, 2014, filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and other information released by NovaCopper and filed with the appropriate regulatory agencies.

The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of Management on the date the statements are made, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or Management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

General

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of the Company is dated July 7, 2014 and provides an analysis of our unaudited interim financial results for the quarter ended May 31, 2014.

The following information should be read in conjunction with our May 31, 2014 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes which were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The MD&A should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended November 30, 2013. A summary of our accounting policies are outlined in note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements and the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. All amounts are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.

15

Scott Petsel, P.Geo., an employee and the Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects Manager, is a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), and has approved the scientific and technical information in this MD&A.

NovaCopper’s shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the NYSE-MKT under the symbol “NCQ”. Additional information related to NovaCopper, including our annual report on Form 10-K, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Description of business

We are a base metals exploration company focused on exploring and developing the Ambler mining district located in Alaska, U.S.A. We conduct our operations through a wholly-owned subsidiary, NovaCopper US. Our Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects, or UKMP Projects, consist of: i) the 100% owned Ambler lands which host the Arctic copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Project; and ii) the Bornite lands being explored under a collaborative long-term agreement with NANA, a regional Alaska Native Corporation, which host the Bornite carbonate-hosted copper Project.

We were formed in 2011 by NovaGold to hold the UKMP Projects, and were spun-out to shareholders of NovaGold through a Plan of Arrangement effective April 30, 2012. NovaGold shareholders received one NovaCopper common share for every six common shares of NovaGold held on the effective date of the Plan of Arrangement.

Recent activities

On July 7, 2014, we completed the financing originally announced on July 1, 2014 where we had entered into definitive agreements with existing shareholders to complete a non-brokered private placement offering of $7,500,000 in Units. Each Unit was priced at $1.15 per Unit and consisted of one common share of the Company and one common share purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $1.60 per share for a period of five years from the closing date. The proceeds raised will be used for the 12 months following closing to fund $2.7 million on program expenditures, up to $4.0 million on general and administrative expenses, and $0.8 million on extraordinary expenses incurred in reducing annual general and administrative expenses.

Program expenditures will be used to complete a re-logging and re-assaying program of between 10,000 and 13,000 meters of historical drill core at Bornite beginning in July 2014. Targeted historical holes are located within the extensions of the Upper and Lower Reef mineralization captured in the Bornite Open Pit Resource released on March 18, 2014 and the up dip portion of South Reef zone. This effort is a continuation of last year’s program of re-sampling and re-assaying which targeted 33 drill holes comprising 11,067 meters of core originally drilled and only selectively sampled by Kennecott between 1957 and 1975. Last year’s re-assay program resulted in a significant increase in the low-grade copper mineralization at Bornite and we expect that the 2014 re-logging and re-assaying program this year could add additional low grade material to the Bornite copper inventory and reduce the strip ratio for a potential open pit mining operation.

During the first half of 2014, we focused efforts on supporting Alaska Industrial Development Export Authority ("AIDEA”) in initiating the permitting process on the Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Road ("AMDIAR”) which is expected to provide access to UKMP Projects. In late April 2014, AIDEA’s board of directors approved a resolution authorizing AIDEA to proceed with an application for the Ambler road to the federal agencies that have jurisdiction over the AMDIAR project and to engage a firm to prepare the environmental impact statement for the project under the direction of the federal agencies. Funding for this initiative was provided in the 2013-2014 Alaska State budget.

AIDEA continued to collect community input at meetings held through the winter of 2013/2014 in various local villages. Environmental baseline studies are planned to begin during the summer field season.

On May 28, 2014, the Governor of Alaska signed Alaska’s 2015 state budget bills into law. AIDEA received an approved budget of $8.5 million from the State of Alaska to fund activities on the AMDIAR in the 2015 fiscal budget.

We also worked closely with NANA on community relations and workforce development strategies during the first half of 2014.

We intend to sign a memorandum of understanding with AIDEA in 2014 to explore the feasibility of utilizing liquid natural gas (“LNG”) trucked from AIDEA’s proposed North Slope LNG plant (or the Interior Energy Project) to the UKMP Projects site to replace diesel as the main source of fuel for any future production at the UKMP Projects. In January 2014, AIDEA announced the selection of the commercial participant to develop the North Slope LNG plant and outlined the target for the first gas delivery to Fairbanks, Alaska in the winter of 2015/2016.

16

We do not currently generate operating cash flows.  As at May 31, 2014, we had consolidated cash of $2.1 million and working capital of $1.4 million. Subsequent to period end, the Company raised $7.5 million through a private placement which is restricted to fund general and administrative expenses and program expenditures during the next twelve months. We will need to raise additional funds to support further exploration of our projects and administration expenses. Future financings are anticipated through debt financing, equity financing, convertible debt, or other means. Our continued operations are dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing or to generate future cash flows.  However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to raise additional capital. For further information, please see “Liquidity and capital resources” below.

Corporate developments

Annual general meeting

On May 21, 2014, NovaCopper held its annual general meeting of shareholders. The shareholders voted for the election of the directors proposed for nomination in the management proxy circular, being: Mr. Tony Giardini, Dr. Thomas Kaplan, Mr. Gregory Lang, Mr. Igor Levental, Mr. Kalidas Madhavpeddi, Mr. Gerald McConnell, Mr. Clynton Nauman, Ms. Janice Stairs, and Mr. Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse. The shareholders also voted in favour of the ratification of an advance notice policy.

Property review

Our principal assets, the UKMP Projects, are located in the Ambler mining district in Northwest Alaska. Our UKMP Projects comprise approximately 352,943 acres (142,831 hectares) consisting of the Ambler and Bornite lands.

Arctic Project

The Ambler lands, which host a number of deposits, including the high-grade copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project, and other mineralized targets within a 65 kilometer long volcanogenic massive sulfide (“VMS”) belt, are owned by NovaCopper US. The Ambler lands are located in Northwestern Alaska and consist of 112,058 acres (45,348 hectares) of Federal patented mining claims and State of Alaska mining claims, within which VMS mineralization has been found.

On January 11, 2010, NovaGold purchased 100% of the Ambler lands. As consideration, NovaGold issued 931,098 common shares with a fair value of $5.0 million and agreed to make two cash payments to the vendor of $12.0 million each in January 2011 and January 2012 for total consideration of $29.0 million. The January 2011 payment was made by NovaGold on January 7, 2011 and the January 2012 payment was made in advance by NovaGold on August 5, 2011. Total fair value of the consideration was $26.5 million, including transaction costs associated with the acquisition of $0.1 million. The vendor retained a 1% net smelter return royalty that the owner of the property can purchase at any time for a one-time payment of $10.0 million.

We have recorded the Ambler lands as a mineral property with acquisition costs capitalized and exploration costs expensed in accordance with our accounting policies. As a result of the spin-out of NovaCopper from NovaGold, the interim consolidated financial statements have been presented under the continuity of interest basis of accounting whereby the amounts are based on the amounts originally recorded by NovaGold as if we had held the property from inception.

Bornite Project

On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper US and NANA signed a collaborative agreement to explore and develop the Ambler mining district. Under the Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease (the “NANA Agreement”), NovaCopper US acquired the exclusive right to explore the Bornite property and lands deeded to NANA through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (“ANCSA”), located adjacent to the Arctic Project, and the non-exclusive right to access and entry onto NANA’s lands. The agreement establishes a framework for any future development of either the Bornite Project or the Arctic Project. Both projects are included as part of a larger area of interest set forth in the NANA agreement.

As consideration, NovaCopper paid $4.0 million to NANA upon signing the NANA agreement and gave NANA the right to appoint a member to NovaCopper’s board of directors within a five year period following our public listing on a stock exchange. NANA has not exercised their right to appoint a board member at this time. Upon the decision to proceed with development of a mine within the area of interest, NANA maintains the right to purchase an ownership interest in the mine equal to between 16%-25% or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after NovaCopper has recovered certain historical costs, capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest in the mine, consideration will be payable based on the elected percentage purchased and the costs incurred on the properties less $40.0 million, not to be less than zero. The parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs incurred in connection with the mine, including capital costs of the mine, based on each party’s pro-rata share. The completion of the agreement with NANA creates a total land package which incorporates our Ambler lands with the adjacent Bornite and ANCSA lands for a total of approximately 352,900 acres (142,831 hectares).

17

NANA would also be granted a net smelter return royalty between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the amount of which is determined by the particular area of land from which production originates.

We have accounted for the Bornite property as a mineral property with acquisition costs capitalized and exploration costs expensed.

Summary of results

			in thousands of dollars,
			except for per share amounts
Selected financial results	Three months	Three months	Six months	Six months
	ended	ended	ended	ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
	$	$	$	$
Amortization	208	254	466	504
General and administrative	457	616	894	1,164
Mineral properties expense	489	2,231	1,069	3,033
Professional fees	176	211	826	510
Salaries	600	602	1,149	1,150
Salaries – stock-based compensation	135	2,000	251	6,113
Loss and comprehensive loss for the period	2,093	5,947	4,707	12,573
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$0.04	$0.11	$0.09	$0.26

For the three month period ended May 31, 2014, we reported a net loss of $2.1 million (or $0.04 basic and diluted loss per common share), a reduction from the net loss of $5.9 million for the corresponding period in 2013 (or $0.11 basic and diluted loss per common share). The significant reduction in expenses is related to the timing of field program start-up in 2014. In 2013, we incurred $2.2 million in mineral property expenses as our field season began in early May. In 2014, our field program is expected to begin in July resulting in minimal charges during the second quarter relating to field activities. The other significant reduction in expenses is from a charge of $2.0 million in stock-based compensation in 2013 compared to $0.1 million in 2014. No stock-based compensation grants have occurred in 2014 resulting in minimal expense from previously granted options and units being recorded in the current period.

Other differences in the three months ended May 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2013 resulted from a reduction in general and administrative expenses and professional fees. General and administrative costs were reduced by approximately 26% from $0.6 million in the three months ended May 31, 2013 to $0.5 million in the three months ended May 31, 2014 due to cost reduction efforts including a reduction in office space costs. Professional fees also decreased by approximately 17% in the comparable three month periods due to cost reduction efforts.

For the six months ended May 31, 2014, NovaCopper reported a net loss of $4.7 million (or $0.09 basic and diluted loss per common share) compared to a net loss of $12.6 million for the corresponding period in 2013 (or $0.26 basic and diluted loss per common share). This variance was primarily due to a non-cash stock-based compensation charge of $6.1 million for the six months ended May 31, 2013 compared to $0.3 million in the corresponding period in 2014. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized for the six months ended May 31, 2013 was $6.1 million which included $3.3 million for options granted under the NovaCopper stock option plan, $0.05 million for NovaGold arrangement options from the spin-out, and $2.7 million for restricted share units (“RSUs”) and deferred share units (“DSUs”) granted to employees and directors with no similar grant in the first quarter of this year. In November 2013, all employees and directors voluntarily returned options outstanding having an exercise price of CAD$3.11 totaling 5,710,000 stock options in order to create a more sustainable long-term retention strategy. As a result, the expense relating to these options was accelerated and recorded in the year ended November 30, 2013. Additionally as noted above, no stock based compensation grants have occurred in 2014 resulting in minimal expense from previously granted options and units being expensed in the current period.

Other differences in the six months ended May 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2013 resulted from a reduction in mineral property expenses and general and administrative expenses offset by an increase in professional fees. For the six months ended May 31, 2014, we reported mineral property expenses of $1.1 million compared to $3.0 million for the corresponding period in 2013. We started our summer field season in early May 2013 resulting in significant expenditures incurred within the six months ended May 31, 2013. Our 2014 summer field season is expected to begin in July resulting in no field season costs incurred for the six months ended May 31, 2014. We were also engaged in a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) study for the Arctic Project in the first half of 2013 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2014 during which we were engaged in the update to the Bornite Project resource estimate, a report involving less technical and engineering consulting. General and administrative costs were reduced from $1.2 million in the six months ended May 31, 2013 to $0.9 million in the six months ended May 31, 2014 due to cost reduction efforts. Our professional fees increased to $0.8 million for the six months ended May 31, 2014 compared to $0.5 million for the six months ended May 31, 2013 as we incurred financing preparation costs relating to the filing of a preliminary prospectus supplement on February 19, 2014 which was not completed for which there is no comparable cost in 2013.

18

Selected financial data

Quarterly information

The following unaudited quarterly information is prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

													in thousands of dollars,
													except per share amounts
	Q2 2014		Q1 2014		Q4 2013		Q3 2013		Q2 2013		Q1 2013		Q4 2012		Q3 2012
	05/31/14		02/28/14		11/30/13		08/31/13		05/31/13		02/28/13		11/30/12		08/31/12
	$		$		$		$		$		$		$		$
Interest and other income	-		1		4		13		9		14		16		19
Mineral property expenses	489		580		1,134		4,727		2,231		802		3,130		9,139
Loss for the period	(2,093	)	(2,615	)	(4,931	)	(6,890	)	(5,947	)	(6,626	)	(7,841	)	(12,559	)
Loss per common share – basic and diluted	(0.04	)	(0.05	)	(0.09	)	(0.13	)	(0.11	)	(0.13	)	(0.17	)	(0.27	)

Factors that can cause fluctuations in our quarterly results include the length of the exploration field season at the UKMP Projects, timing of property acquisition payments, stock option vesting, and issuance of shares. The majority of the field season typically occurs in the third quarter of each year. Other factors that have caused fluctuations in the quarterly results that would not be expected to re-occur include our incorporation and completion of the spin-out.

During the third quarter of 2012, mineral property expenses of $9.1 million were recorded as a larger exploration program was conducted than previous years. Additionally, stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million was recognized due to the vesting of previously granted stock options. During the fourth quarter of 2012, mineral property expenses of $3.1 million were recorded for the end of the 2012 field season. Stock-based compensation expense of $1.9 million was also recognized due to the vesting of previously granted stock options. During the first quarter of 2013, we incurred expenses of $4.1 million in stock-based compensation expense due to the vesting of previously granted stock options and the granting of RSUs and DSUs. We also recognized mineral property expenses of $0.8 million related to preparation activities for the 2013 field season and ongoing engineering studies. During the second quarter of 2013, we incurred mineral property expenses of $2.2 million consisting of the start-up of the field season in May 2013 and continuation of engineering studies. We also incurred expenses of $2.0 million in stock-based compensation due to the expense being recorded evenly over the vesting period of previously granted stock options and RSUs. During the third quarter of 2013, mineral property expenses of $4.7 million were recorded as the majority of the exploration program was conducted during the quarter. During the fourth quarter of 2013, stock-based compensation of $1.4 million was recorded due to an acceleration of expense as a result of the cancelling of 5,710,000 stock options during the period. All expense for unvested options was accelerated and included in the fourth quarter of 2013. During the first quarter of 2014, we incurred $0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense due to the prior acceleration of expense in the fourth quarter of 2013. As a result, our loss for the first quarter ended February 28, 2014 is significantly reduced. During the second quarter of 2014, we incurred $0.5 million in mineral property expenses as our field season start-up in 2014 is expected to occur in July, later than in previous years. As a result, no field season activity costs were incurred in Q2 2014 resulting in a significantly reduced loss of $2.1 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared to previous second quarter losses.

Our properties are not yet in production; consequently, we believe that our loss (and consequent loss per common share) is not a primary concern to investors in the Company.

Liquidity and capital resources

At May 31, 2014, we had $2.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. At November 30, 2013, we had consolidated cash of $6.5 million and working capital of $4.7 million. We expended $4.4 million on operating activities during the six month period ended May 31, 2014, compared with expenditures of $6.4 million for operating activities for the same period in 2013. The majority of cash spent on operating activities during both periods was expended on mineral property expenses, general and administrative, salaries, and professional fees. As the exploration field season in the Ambler mining district in 2013 began in May, a significant portion of the mineral property expenses expended during the 2013 fiscal year were incurred during this period. As our project program for 2014 is anticipated to begin in July, cash expended on mineral property expenses was significantly reduced from the prior year.

During the six month period ended May 31, 2014, we raised $0.02 million from financing activities due to proceeds received from the exercise of NovaGold arrangement options with no comparable amount from financing activities generated in the same period in 2013.

19

During the six month period ended May 31, 2014 we expended minimal cash on investing activities. Equipment purchases consisted of mainly replacement items totaling $0.01 million. With last year’s start-up of field activities during the six month period ended May 31, 2013, we expended $0.02 million on equipment to support drill and camp activities. We also moved into office space in April 2013 incurring $0.1 million in information technology and office infrastructure.

Substantial doubt exists as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as the continued operations and exploration activities of the Company are dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing within the next twelve months. Subsequent to May 31, 2014, the Company raised $7.5 million through a private placement which is restricted to fund general and administrative expenses and program expenditures during the next twelve months. The Company will need to raise additional funds to support further exploration of its projects and administration expenses. Future financings are anticipated through equity financing, debt financing, convertible debt, or other means.There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional financing, that sufficient funds will be available to the Company, or be available on favourable terms in the future. Factors that could affect the availability of financing include fluctuations in the Company's share price, the state of international debt and equity markets, investor perceptions and expectations, global financial and metals markets, and progress on the Company's exploration properties.

Contractual obligations

Contractual obligated undiscounted cash flow requirements as at May 31, 2014 are as follows:

				in thousands of dollars,
				unless otherwise specified
	Total	< 1 Year	1–3 Years	3–5 Years	> 5 Years
	$	$	$	$	$
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,510	1,510	-	-	-
Office lease	539	87	371	81	-
Total	2,049	1,597	371	81	-

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements. On January 25, 2013, we entered into a commitment to lease office space effective May 1, 2013 for a period of four years with a remaining total commitment of $0.5 million.

Outstanding share data

At July 7, 2014, we had 60,229,697 common shares issued and outstanding. At July 7, 2014, we had 6,521,740 warrants with an exercise price of $1.60, 155,000 stock options with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.73, 728,763 NovaGold arrangement options with a weighted-average exercise price of $5.40, 422,340 RSUs, 618,191 DSUs, and 20,685 NovaGold DSUs for which the holder is entitled to receive one common share for every six NovaGold shares received outstanding.

New accounting pronouncements

Unless otherwise noted, the following revised standards and amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 1, 2013 or as noted. The Company is continuing to assess the impact of these standards and amendments or has determined whether we will early adopt them, as noted.

i.	Income tax disclosure
	The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” (“ASU 2013-11”) which amended Topic 740, Income Taxes to provide guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. It was released to provide clear guidance to minimize divergence in practice when disclosing unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013. We adopted this standard for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have any impact as our disclosure meets the recommended practice.
ii.	Offsetting assets and liabilities
	In January 2013, the FASB issued “Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2013-01”). ASU 2013-01 clarifies Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11: “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”) to restrict the scope of implementation to derivatives accounted for under Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which includes bifurcated embedded derivatives repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that require an offset or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. ASU 2013-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. We adopted this standard for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

20

iii.

Development stage entity

In June 2014, the FASB issued “Development Stage Entities – Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation” (“ASU 2014-10”). ASU 2014-10 eliminates the concept of a development stage entity, of which NovaCopper had been classified. As a result of the elimination, certain financial reporting disclosures have been eliminated as well, including the presentation of an inception-to-date statement of income and cash flow. ASU 2014-10 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption of this standard is permitted, and we expect to adopt for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is expected to have an impact on the disclosure and presentation of our statement of loss and comprehensive loss and the statement of cash flows as it will no longer include the cumulative during exploration stage column currently presented.

Critical accounting estimates

The most critical accounting estimates upon which our financial status depends are those requiring estimates of the recoverability of our capitalized mineral properties, impairment of long-lived assets and valuation of stock-based compensation.

Mineral properties and development costs

All direct costs related to the acquisition of mineral property interests are capitalized. Mineral property exploration expenditures are expensed when incurred. When it has been established that a mineral deposit is commercially mineable and an economic analysis has been completed in accordance with Industry Guide 7, the costs subsequently incurred to develop a mine on the property prior to the start of mining operations are capitalized and will be amortized against production following commencement of commercial production using the unit of production method over the estimated life of proven and probable reserves.

The acquisition of title to mineral properties is a complicated and uncertain process. NovaCopper has taken steps, in accordance with industry standards, to verify the mineral property in which it has an interest. Although we have made efforts to ensure that legal title to our property is properly recorded, there can be no assurance that such title will ultimately be secured.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Management assesses the possibility of impairment in the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Management calculates the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows relating to the asset or asset group using estimated future prices, proven and probable reserves and other mineral resources, and operating, capital and reclamation costs. When the carrying value of an asset exceeds the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value, which is usually determined using discounted future cash flows. Management’s estimates of mineral prices, mineral resources, foreign exchange, production levels and operating capital and reclamation costs are subject to risk and uncertainties that may affect the determination of the recoverability of the long-lived asset. It is possible that material changes could occur that may adversely affect Management’s estimates.

Stock-based compensation

Compensation expense for options granted to employees, directors and certain service providers is determined based on estimated fair values of the options at the time of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which takes into account, as of the grant date, the fair market value of the shares, expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the option. The cost is recognized using the graded attribution method over the vesting period of the respective options. The expense relating to the fair value of stock options is included in expenses and is credited to contributed surplus. Shares are issued from treasury in settlement of options exercised.

Compensation expense for RSUs and DSUs granted to employees and directors, respectively, is determined based on estimated fair values of the units at the time of grant using quoted market prices or at the time the units qualify for equity classification under ASC 718. The cost is recognized using the graded attribution method over the vesting period of the respective units. The expense relating to the fair value of the units is included in expenses and is credited to other liabilities or contributed surplus based on the unit plan’s classification. Units may be settled in either i) cash and/or ii) shares issued from treasury, at the Company’s election at the time of vesting.

21

Additional information

Additional information regarding the Company, including our annual report on Form 10-K, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov and on our website at www.novacopper.com.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks, including currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, interest risk and price risk. Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related parties. Our instruments are held in the normal course to meet daily operating and cash flow needs of the business. The fair value of accounts payable and accrued liabilities and due to related parties approximates their carrying value due to the short-term nature of their maturity. Our other liabilities are held at fair value and are a Level 1 financial instrument valued using quoted market prices. All of our other financial instruments are initially measured at fair value and then held at amortized cost.

(a) Currency risk

Currency risk is the risk of a fluctuation in financial asset and liability settlement amounts due to a change in foreign exchange rates. We operate in the United States and Canada with some expenses incurred in Canadian dollars. Our exposure is limited to cash of CDN$40,000, accounts receivable of CDN$34,000 and accounts payable of CDN$180,000. Based on a 10% change in the US-Canadian exchange rate, assuming all other variables remain constant, our net loss would change by approximately $10,000.

(b) Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. Our cash and cash equivalents are all held with Canadian Chartered financial institutions and are composed of financial instruments issued by Canadian banks. Our accounts receivable consist of HST receivable from the Federal Government of Canada, amounts due from related parties and receivables due for camp and management services provided to other parties. Our exposure to credit risk is equal to the balance of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable as recorded in the financial statements.

(c) Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will encounter difficulties raising funds to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. We are in the exploration stage and do not have cash inflows from operations; therefore, we manage our liquidity risk through the management of our capital structure and financial leverage. We do expect, based on anticipated but not committed expenditures on its projects, we are likely to require financing within the next twelve months. Future financings are expected to be obtained through debt financing, equity financing, convertible debt, exercise of options, or other means. Continued operations are dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing or to generate future cash flows. Our contractually obligated cash flow is disclosed under the section titled “Liquidity and capital resources”.

(d) Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. We hold excess cash balances in money market funds which are highly liquid which limits the risk of loss due to interest rate changes to $nil.

(e) Price risk

We are exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices as future profitability and long-term viability will depend, in large parts, on the price of copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver. The market prices for such metals are volatile and subject to numerous factors beyond Management’s control. Management closely monitors commodity prices to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken. We do not have any hedging or other commodity-based risks respecting its operations.

As we are currently in the exploration phase none of our financial instruments are exposed to commodity price risk; however, our ability to obtain long-term financing and our economic viability could be affected by commodity price volatility.

22

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of May 31, 2014. On the basis of this review, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act) during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

23

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are a party to routine litigation and proceedings that are considered part of the ordinary course of its business. We are not aware of any material current, pending, or threatened litigation.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2013, as filed with the SEC on January 30, 2014. The risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2013, in addition to the other information set forth in this quarterly report, could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be immaterial could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures

These disclosures are not applicable to us.

Item 5.     Other Information.

None.

Item 6.     Exhibits

Exhibits

     See Exhibit Index.

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: July 9, 2014	NOVACOPPER INC.
	By:	/s/ Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse
		Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse
		President and Chief Executive Officer
	By:	/s/ Elaine M. Sanders
		Elaine M. Sanders
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

25

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101**	Interactive Data Files
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
**	Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

26