UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(Amendment No. 1)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from      to 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-35633

Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland	45-5188530
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2005 5th Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, Washington	98121
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (206) 448-0884

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   YES ☒  NO ☐

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   YES ☒ NO ☐

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting Company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☒
		(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES ☐ NO ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

As of August 10, 2016, there were 2,486,899 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (“Form 10-Q/A”) amends the Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 (“Form 10-Q”) and is being filed solely for the purpose of updating the information contained in “Note 9 - Earnings Per Common Share” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and to correct the dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding initially reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Note 9 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016.  In addition, pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Item 6 of Part II of the original Form 10-Q has been amended to contain currently-dated certifications from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

No other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q.  This Form 10-Q/A speaks as of the original filing date of the Form 10-Q, does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date and, except for the foregoing amended information, does not modify or update in any way disclosures made in the Form 10-Q.

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page Number
PART I    FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.      Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016  and December 31, 2015 (unaudited)		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		7
Selected Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	35
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	35
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	36
Item 1A	Risk Factors	36
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	36
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	36
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	36
Item 5.	Other Information	36
Item 6.	Exhibits	37
SIGNATURES
EXHIBITS

2

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	June 30, 2016			December 31,  2015
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,187		$	48,264
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value		7,393			6,696
Loans held for sale		687			2,091
Loans		464,648			459,469
Allowance for loan losses		(4,838	)		(4,636	)
Total loans, net		459,810			454,833
Accrued interest receivable		1,592			1,608
Bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), net		11,914			11,746
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) and repossessed assets, net		780			769
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value		3,026			3,249
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost		2,073			2,212
Premises and equipment, net		5,088			5,335
Other assets		4,209			3,957
Total assets	$	541,759		$	540,760
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Interest-bearing	$	384,323		$	389,151
Noninterest-bearing demand		59,544			50,873
Total deposits		443,867			440,024
Borrowings		35,613			40,435
Accrued interest payable		90			72
Other liabilities		4,873			5,140
Advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance		505			569
Total liabilities		484,948			486,240
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 7)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 2,480,830 and 2,469,206 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		25			25
Additional paid-in capital		23,247			23,002
Unearned shares - Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)		(911	)		(911	)
Retained earnings		34,228			32,240
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		222			164
Total stockholders’ equity		56,811			54,520
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	541,759		$	540,760

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	6,051		$	5,363	$	12,003		$	10,685
Interest and dividends on investments, cash and cash equivalents		92			47		181			102
Total interest income		6,143			5,410		12,184			10,787
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		654			661		1,342			1,322
Borrowings		55			19		84			47
Total interest expense		709			680		1,426			1,369
Net interest income		5,434			4,730		10,758			9,418
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		100			200		250			300
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		5,334			4,530		10,508			9,118
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges and fee income		652			671		1,245			1,316
Earnings on cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance		85			84		168			168
Mortgage servicing income		208			214		413			469
Fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights		(76	)		347		(190	)		169
Loss on sale of securities		-			-		-			(31	)
Net gain on sale of loans		341			390		551			786
Total noninterest income		1,210			1,706		2,187			2,877
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and benefits		2,618			2,205		5,181			4,460
Operations		1,084			1,053		2,056			1,957
Regulatory assessments		125			230		280			296
Occupancy		380			448		765			773
Data processing		444			454		830			856
Net loss on OREO and repossessed assets		6			10		6			82
Total noninterest expense		4,657			4,400		9,118			8,424
Income before provision for income taxes		1,887			1,836		3,577			3,571
Provision for income taxes		633			589		1,217			1,116
Net income	$	1,254		$	1,247	$	2,360		$	2,455
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.51		$	0.50	$	0.95		$	0.98
Diluted	$	0.49		$	0.48	$	0.92		$	0.94
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		2,481,093			2,510,673		2,479,422			2,517,734
Diluted		2,558,028			2,601,984		2,552,005			2,602,777

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended  June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income	$	1,254	$	1,247	$	2,360	$	2,455
Available for sale securities:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax provision (benefits) of $27, $9, $30 and $(12), respectively		52		21		58		(17	)
Reclassification adjustments for the net losses realized in earnings, net of tax benefit of $0, $0, $0 and $11		-		-		-		20
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		52		21		58		3
Comprehensive income	$	1,306	$	1,268	$	2,418	$	2,458

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Shares			Common Stock		Additional Paid- in Capital			Unearned ESOP Shares			Retained  Earnings			Accumulated Other  Comprehensive Income net of tax		Total  Stockholders’  Equity
Balances at December 31, 2014		2,524,645		$	25	$	23,552		$	(1,140	)	$	28,024		$	183	$	50,644
Net income													2,455					2,455
Other comprehensive income, net of tax																3		3
Share-based compensation							207											207
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.11 per share)													(277	)				(277	)
Restricted stock awards issued		10,208																-
Restricted stock forfeited and retired		(7,535	)															-
Common stock repurchased		(63,371	)				(1,261	)										(1,261	)
Exercise of options		1,783					17											17
Balances at June 30, 2015		2,465,730		$	25	$	22,515		$	(1,140	)	$	30,202		$	186	$	51,788

	Shares			Common Stock		Additional Paid- in Capital		Unearned ESOP Shares			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income net of tax		Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2015		2,469,206		$	25	$	23,002	$	(911	)	$	32,240		$	164	$	54,520
Net income												2,360					2,360
Other comprehensive income, net of tax															58		58
Share-based compensation							228										228
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.15 per share)												(372	)				(372	)
Restricted stock awards issued		11,606															-
Restricted stock forfeited and retired		(1,059	)														-
Exercise of options		1,077					17										17
Balances at June 30, 2016		2,480,830		$	25	$	23,247	$	(911	)	$	34,228		$	222	$	56,811

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

 SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	2,360		$	2,455
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Accretion of net discounts on investments		17			79
Loss on sale of securities		-			31
Dividends paid on FHLB stock		32			-
Provision for loan losses		250			300
Depreciation and amortization		394			295
Compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock		228			207
Changes in fair value of mortgage servicing rights		482			193
Additions to mortgage servicing rights		(259	)		(436	)
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI		(168	)		(168	)
Gain on sale of loans		(551	)		(786	)
Proceeds from sale of loans		36,080			44,610
Originations of loans held for sale		(34,125	)		(46,075	)
Net Loss on sale and write-downs of OREO and repossessed assets		8			22
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		16			3
Other assets		(282	)		(710	)
Accrued interest payable		18			3
Other liabilities		(267	)		608
Net cash from operating activities		4,233			631
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from principal payments, maturities and sales of available for sale securities		737			3,516
Purchases of available for sale securities		(1,363	)		-
FHLB stock redeemed		107			579
Net increase in loans		(5,378	)		(4,833	)
Proceeds from sale of OREO and other repossessed assets		132			400
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(147	)		(479	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(5,912	)		(817	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits		3,843			10,820
Proceeds from borrowings		56,500			36,000
Repayment of borrowings		(61,322	)		(40,322	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(372	)		(277	)
Net change in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		(64	)		7
Proceeds from stock option exercises		17			17
Repurchase of common stock		-			(1,261	)
Net cash (used by) from financing activities		(1,398	)		4,984
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(3,077	)		4,798
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		48,264			29,289
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	45,187		$	34,087
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	1,000		$	625
Interest paid on deposits and borrowings	$	1,408		$	1,366
Noncash net transfer from loans to OREO and repossessed assets	$	712		$	481

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

7

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial information is unaudited and has been prepared from the consolidated financial statements of Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sound Community Bank.  References in this document to Sound Financial Bancorp refer to Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. and its predecessor, Sound Financial, Inc., a federal corporation, and references to the “Bank” refer to Sound Community Bank.  References to “we,” “us,” and “our” or the “Company” means Sound Financial Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sound Community Bank unless the context otherwise requires.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included.  Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.  These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on March 30, 2016 (“2015 Form 10-K”).  The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in the 2015 Form 10-K.  Certain amounts in the prior quarters’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.  These classifications do not have an impact on previously reported consolidated net income, retained earnings, stockholders’ equity or earnings per share.

Note 2 – Accounting Pronouncements Recently Issued or Adopted

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which creates Topic 606 and supersedes Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which postponed the effective date of 2014-09. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net, which amended the principal versus agent implementation guidance set for in ASU 2014-09. Among other things, ASU 2016-08 clarifies that an entity should evaluate whether it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The ASU amends certain aspects of the guidance set forth in the FASB's new revenue standard related to identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation. The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In general, the new ASU requires companies to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance, including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The standard is effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is not permitted. For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805). The ASU simplifies the accounting for measurement period adjustments. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period when the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquirer is required to record in the same period's financial statements the effect on earnings from changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects resulting from the change to provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The acquirer must present separately on the income statement, or disclose in the notes, the amount recorded in current-period earnings that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the provisional amount had been recognized at the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The new guidance is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. This ASU requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the amendment requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes and requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. This ASU also eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The amendment also requires a reporting organization to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument specific credit risk (also referred to as “own credit”) when the organization has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for certain provisions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

8

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize, on the balance sheet, the assets and liabilities arising from operating leases. A lessee should recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. A lessee should include payments to be made in an optional period only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. For a finance lease, interest payments should be recognized separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income. For operating leases, the lease cost should be allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendments in the ASU is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships. A contract novation refers to replacing one of the parties to a derivative instrument with a new party. This ASU clarifies that a change in counterparty in a derivative instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship and therefore discontinue the application of hedge accounting. ASU 2016-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period.  The adoption of ASU 2016-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. The ASU eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an adjustment must be made to the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). The amendments in this ASU require entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. The ASU includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU is being reviewed for any material impact there may be on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments- Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU replaces the existing incurred loss impairment methodology that recognizes credit losses when a probable loss has been incurred with new methodology where loss estimates are based upon lifetime expected credit losses. The amendments in this ASU require a financial asset that is measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The income statement would then reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as changes to the expected credit losses that have taken place during the reporting period. The measurement of expected credit losses will be based on historical information, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that impact the collectability of the reported amount. Available-for-sale securities will bifurcate the fair value mark and establish an allowance for credit losses through the income statement for the credit portion of that mark. The interest portion will continue to be recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The change in allowance recognized as a result of adoption will occur through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the ASU is adopted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

9

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 3 – Investments

The amortized cost and fair value of our available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses at the dates indicated were as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
June 30, 2016
Municipal bonds	$	3,272	$	272	$	-		$	3,544
Agency mortgage-backed securities		3,387		83		-			3,470
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities		397		-		(18	)		379
Total	$	7,056	$	355	$	(18	)	$	7,393
December 31, 2015
Municipal bonds	$	1,912	$	184	$	-		$	2,096
Agency mortgage-backed securities		4,088		102		(18	)		4,172
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities		449		-		(21	)		428
Total	$	6,449	$	286	$	(39	)	$	6,696

The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities at June 30, 2016, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands).  Expected maturities of AFS securities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	At June 30, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due within five years	$	1,115	$	1,120
Due in five to ten years		505		534
Due after ten years		5,436		5,739
Total	$	7,056	$	7,393

No securities were pledged to secure Washington State Public Funds as of June 30, 2016.

There were no sales of AFS securities during the three or six months ended June 30, 2016. There were no sales of AFS securities during the three months ended June 30, 2015. We sold $1.7 million of non-agency mortgage-backed securities generating gross losses of $31,000 and no gross gains during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The following tables summarize at the dates indicated the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time of those investments that have been continuously in an unrealized loss position (in thousands):

	June 30, 2016
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities	$	-	$	-	$	379	$	(18	)	$	379	$	(18	)
Total	$	-	$	-	$	379	$	(18	)	$	379	$	(18	)

	December 31, 2015
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$		$		$	1,370	$	(18	)	$	1,370	$	(18	)
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities		-		-		428		(21	)		428		(21	)
Total	$		$		$	1,798	$	(39	)	$	1,798	$	(39	)

10

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table presents the cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized in earnings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 relating to the Company’s non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Estimated credit losses, beginning balance	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	450
Additions for credit losses not previously recognized		-		-		-		-
Reduction for increases in cash flows		-		-		-		-
Reduction of related OTTI due to sales		-		-		-		(450	)
Reduction for realized losses		-		-		-		-
Estimated credit losses, ending balance	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Note 4 – Loans

The composition of the loan portfolio at the dates indicated, excluding loans held for sale, was as follows (in thousands):

	At June 30, 2016			At December 31, 2015
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	149,874		$	141,125
Home equity		31,804			31,573
Commercial and multifamily		164,916			175,312
Construction and land		57,792			57,043
Total real estate loans	$	404,386		$	405,053
Consumer loans:
Manufactured homes		15,114			13,798
Other consumer		24,953			23,030
Total consumer loans		40,067			36,828
Commercial business loans		21,967			19,295
Total loans		466,420			461,176
Deferred fees		(1,772	)		(1,707	)
Total loans, gross		464,648			459,469
Allowance for loan losses		(4,838	)		(4,636	)
Total loans, net	$	459,810		$	454,833

11

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

	One- to four- family		Home equity		Commercial and multifamily		Construction and land		Manufactured homes		Other consumer		Commercial business		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	637	$	100	$	424	$	23	$	56	$	24	$	38	$	-	$	1,302
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,076		401		953		365		133		197		133		278		3,536
Ending balance	$	1,713	$	501	$	1,377	$	388	$	189	$	221	$	171	$	278	$	4,838
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,612	$	1,049	$	4,861	$	87	$	394	$	24	$	646	$	-	$	12,673
Collectively evaluated for impairment		144,262		30,755		160,055		57,705		14,720		24,929		21,321		-		453,747
Ending balance	$	149,874	$	31,804	$	164,916	$	57,792	$	15,114	$	24,953	$	21,967	$	-	$	466,420

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	One-to- four family		Home equity		Commercial and multifamily		Construction and land		Manufactured homes		Other consumer		Commercial business		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for  loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	647	$	110	$	36	$	18	$	63	$	-	$	8	$	-	$	882
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,192		497		885		364		238		188		149		241		3,754
Ending balance	$	1,839	$	607	$	921	$	382	$	301	$	188	$	157	$	241	$	4,636
Loans  receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,779	$	904	$	1,966	$	91	$	361	$	5	$	114	$	-	$	9,220
Collectively evaluated for impairment		135,346		30,669		173,346		56,952		13,437		23,025		19,181		-		451,956
Ending balance	$	141,125	$	31,573	$	175,312	$	57,043	$	13,798	$	23,030	$	19,295	$	-	$	461,176

12

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

	Beginning Allowance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision			Ending Allowance
One-to four- family	$	1,733	$	(7	)	$	-	$	(13	)	$	1,713
Home equity		597		-			63		(159	)		501
Commercial and multifamily		1,267		-			-		110			1,377
Construction and land		463		-			-		(75	)		388
Manufactured homes		202		-			3		(16	)		189
Other consumer		233		(3	)		2		(11	)		221
Commercial business		164		(29	)		-		36			171
Unallocated		50		-			-		228			278
Total	$	4,709	$	(39	)	$	68	$	100		$	4,838

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

	Beginning Allowance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision			Ending Allowance
One-to four- family	$	1,839	$	(72	)	$	-	$	(54	)	$	1,713
Home equity		607		-			65		(171	)		501
Commercial and multifamily		921		-			-		456			1,377
Construction and land		382		-			-		6			388
Manufactured homes		301		-			5		(117	)		189
Other consumer		188		(21	)		4		50			221
Commercial business		157		(29	)		-		43			171
Unallocated		241		-			-		37			278
Total	$	4,636	$	(122	)	$	74	$	250		$	4,838

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2015 (in thousands):

	Beginning Allowance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision			Ending Allowance
One-to four- family	$	1,429	$	-		$	-	$	165		$	1,594
Home equity		514		-			6		(11	)		509
Commercial and multifamily		1,406		-			-		101			1,507
Construction and land		414		(40	)		-		(29	)		345
Manufactured homes		184		(32	)		2		39			193
Other consumer		154		(3	)		3		29			183
Commercial business		104		-			-		41			145
Unallocated		231		-			-		(135	)		96
Total	$	4,436	$	(75	)	$	11	$	200		$	4,572

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 (in thousands):

	Beginning Allowance		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision			Ending Allowance
One-to four- family	$	1,442	$	(21	)	$	-	$	173		$	1,594
Home equity		601		(19	)		10		(83	)		509
Commercial and multifamily		1,244		-			-		263			1,507
Construction and land		399		(40	)		-		(14	)		345
Manufactured homes		193		(32	)		5		27			193
Other consumer		167		(27	)		9		34			183
Commercial business		108		-			-		37			145
Unallocated		233		-			-		(137	)		96
Total	$	4,387	$	(139	)	$	24	$	300		$	4,572

13

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Credit Quality Indicators.  Federal regulations provide for the classification of lower quality loans as substandard, doubtful or loss.  An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the borrower or of any collateral pledged.  Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.  Assets classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses of currently existing facts, conditions and values.  Assets classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets without establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted.

When we classify problem loans as either substandard or doubtful, we may establish a specific allowance in an amount we deem prudent to address the risk specifically (if the loan is impaired) or we may allow the loss to be addressed in the general allowance (if the loan is not impaired).  General allowances represent loss reserves which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been specifically allocated to particular problem loans.  When the Company classifies problem loans as a loss, we charge off such assets in the period in which they are deemed uncollectible.  Assets that do not currently expose us to sufficient risk to warrant classification as substandard, doubtful or loss but possess identified weaknesses are classified as either watch or special mention assets.  Our determination as to the classification of our assets and the amount of our valuation allowances is subject to review by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Bank’s federal regulatory, and the Washington Department of Financial Institutions, the Bank’s state banking regulator, which can order the establishment of additional loss allowances.  Pass rated loans are loans that are not otherwise classified or criticized.

The following table represents the internally assigned grades as of June 30, 2016 by type of loan (in thousands):

	One- to four- family		Home equity		Commercial and multifamily		Construction and land		Manufactured homes		Other consumer		Commercial business		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	145,696	$	30,464	$	158,819	$	54,586	$	14,863	$	24,877	$	21,554	$	450,859
Watch		1,089		538		1,763		3,206		115		52		25		6,788
Special Mention		1,408		-		1,415		-		31		-		-		2,854
Substandard		1,681		802		2,919				105		24		388		5,919
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	149,874	$	31,804	$	164,916	$	57,792	$	15,114	$	24,953	$	21,967	$	466,420

The following table represents the internally assigned grades as of December 31, 2015 by type of loan (in thousands):

	One- to four- family		Home equity		Commercial and multifamily		Construction and land		Manufactured homes		Other consumer		Commercial business		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	136,879	$	30,310	$	169,072	$	55,984	$	13,621	$	22,967	$	18,449	$	447,282
Watch		1,015		609		4,810		1,059		96		58		846		8,493
Special Mention		1,409		-		1,430		-		33		-		-		2,872
Substandard		1,822		654		-		-		48		5		-		2,529
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	141,125	$	31,573	$	175,312	$	57,043	$	13,798	$	23,030	$	19,295	$	461,176

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans.  Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due.  Loans are automatically placed on nonaccrual once the loan is 90 days past due or sooner if, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment of obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory authorities.

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, by type of loan (in thousands):

	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
One- to four- family	$	875	$	1,157
Home equity		494		344
Commercial and multifamily		2,143		-
Construction and land		164		-
Manufactured homes		79		27
Other consumer		22		-
Total	$	3,777	$	1,528

14

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table represents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of June 30, 2016 by type of loan (in thousands):

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days and Greater Past Due		90 Days and Greater Past Due and Still Accruing		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
One-to four- family	$	-	$	458	$	730	$	-	$	1,188	$	148,686	$	149,874
Home equity		469		120		354		-		943		30,861		31,804
Commercial and multifamily		231		-		-		-		231		164,685		164,916
Construction and land		-		64		-		-		64		57,728		57,792
Manufactured homes		61		-		62		-		123		14,991		15,114
Other consumer		11		3		21		-		35		24,918		24,953
Commercial business		5		-		-		-		5		21,962		21,967
Total	$	777	$	645	$	1,167	$	-	$	2,589	$	463,831	$	466,420

The following table represents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, 2015 by type of loan (in thousands):

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days and Greater Past Due		90 Days and Greater Past Due and Still Accruing		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
One-to four- family	$	2,453	$	265	$	881	$	117	$	3,716	$	137,409	$	141,125
Home equity		352		60		296		-		708		30,865		31,573
Commercial and multifamily		203		-		-		-		203		175,109		175,312
Construction and land		65		-		-		-		65		56,978		57,043
Manufactured homes		103		27		-		-		130		13,668		13,798
Other consumer		17		26		-		-		43		22,987		23,030
Commercial business		154		8		-		-		162		19,133		19,295
Total	$	3,347	$	386	$	1,177	$	117	$	5,027	$	456,149	$	461,176

Nonperforming Loans.  Loans are considered nonperforming when they are placed on nonaccrual and/or when they are considered to be nonperforming troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) and/or when they are 90 days or greater past due and still accruing.  A TDR is a loan to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty that has been modified from its original terms and conditions in such a way that the Company is granting the borrower a concession of some kind.  Nonperforming TDRs include TDRs that do not have sufficient payment history (typically greater than six months) to be considered performing or TDRs that have become 30 or more days past due.

The following table represents the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio based on payment activity as of June 30, 2016 by type of loan (in thousands):

	One- to four- family		Home equity		Commercial and multifamily		Construction and land		Manufactured homes		Other consumer		Commercial business		Total
Performing	$	148,631	$	31,143	$	162,772	$	57,792	$	14,964	$	24,931	$	21,706	$	461,939
Nonperforming		1,244		661		2,144		-		150		22		261		4,482
Total	$	149,874	$	31,804	$	164,916	$	57,792	$	15,114	$	24,953	$	21,967	$	466,420

The following table represents the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio based on payment activity as of December 31, 2015 by type of loan (in thousands):

	One- to four- family		Home equity		Commercial and multifamily		Construction and land		Manufactured homes		Other consumer		Commercial business		Total
Performing	$	139,484	$	31,146	$	175,312	$	57,043	$	13,736	$	23,030	$	19,295	$	459,046
Nonperforming		1,641		427		-				62		-		-		2,130
Total	$	141,125	$	31,573	$	175,312	$	57,043	$	13,798	$	23,030	$	19,295	$	461,176

15

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Impaired Loans.  A loan is considered impaired when we have determined that we may be unable to collect payments of principal or interest when due under the terms of the loan.  In the process of identifying loans as impaired, we take into consideration factors which include payment history and status, collateral value, financial condition of the borrower, and the probability of collecting scheduled payments in the future.  Minor payment delays and insignificant payment shortfalls typically do not result in a loan being classified as impaired.  The significance of payment delays and shortfalls is considered on a case by case basis, after taking into consideration the totality of circumstances surrounding the loans and the borrowers, including payment history. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for all loans in the portfolio.  All TDRs are also classified as impaired loans and are included in the loans individually evaluated for impairment in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses.

Impaired loans at June 30, 2016  and December 31, 2015 by type of loan were as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2016
			Recorded Investment
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Allowance		With Allowance		Related Allowance
One- to four- family	$	6,066	$	2,482	$	3,129	$	639
Home equity		1,079		606		443		100
Commercial and multifamily		4,862		2,191		2,671		424
Construction and land		87		-		87		23
Manufactured homes		414		129		265		56
Other consumer		24		-		24		24
Commercial business		646		149		497		37
Total	$	13,178	$	5,558	$	7,116	$	1,303

	December 31, 2015
			Recorded Investment
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Allowance			With Allowance	Related Allowance
One- to four- family	$	6,011	$	499	$	5,280	$	647
Home equity		994		162		742		110
Commercial and multifamily		1,966		1,430		536		36
Construction and land		91		-		91		18
Manufactured homes		366		-		361		63
Other consumer		5		-		5		-
Commercial business		114		-		114		8
Total	$	9,547	$	2,091	$	7,129	$	882

16

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Income on impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by type of loan were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016				Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
One- to four- family	$	5,539	$	72	$	4,829	$	57
Home equity		993		15		1,149		9
Commercial and multifamily		4,887		66		2,767		40
Construction and land		88		1		158		1
Manufactured homes		387		9		387		7
Other consumer		26		1		60		-
Commercial business		573		11		121		1
Total	$	12,493	$	175	$	9,471	$	115

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016				Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
One- to four- family	$	5,619	$	140	$	4,614	$	122
Home equity		963		27		1,181		23
Commercial and multifamily		3,913		133		2,829		70
Construction and land		89		2		165		2
Manufactured homes		378		16		393		13
Other consumer		19		2		57		1
Commercial business		420		18		122		3
Total	$	11,401	$	338	$	9,361	$	234

Forgone interest on nonaccrual loans was $78,000 and $40,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  There were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were classified as nonaccrual, TDR or impaired at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

Troubled debt restructurings.  Loans classified as TDRs totaled $5.7 million and $6.0 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and are included in impaired loans.  The Company has granted in its TDRs a variety of concessions to borrowers in the form of loan modifications.  The modifications granted can generally be described in the following categories:

Rate Modification: A modification in which the interest rate is changed.

Term Modification: A modification in which the maturity date, timing of payments or frequency of payments is changed.

Payment Modification: A modification in which the dollar amount of the payment is changed.  Interest only modifications in which a loan in converted to interest only payments for a period of time are included in this category.

Combination Modification:  Any other type of modification, including the use of multiple categories above.

17

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

There were no new TDRs that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.  There were no loans modified as TDRs within the previous 12 months.

There were no post-modification changes for the recorded investment in loans that were recorded as a result of the TDRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The allowance for loan losses allocated to TDRs at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $655,000 and $349,000, respectively.

Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present information about the level in the fair value hierarchy for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, whether or not recognized or recorded at fair value as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	June 30, 2016				Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,187	$	45,187	$	45,187	$	-	$	-
Available-for-sale securities		7,393		7,393		-		7,393		-
Loans held for sale		687		687		-		687		-
Loans, net		459,810		462,150		-		-		462,150
Accrued interest receivable		1,592		1,592		1,592		-		-
Mortgage servicing rights		3,026		3,026		-		-		3,026
FHLB stock		2,073		2,073		-		-		2,073
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Non-maturity deposits		283,329		283,329		-		283,329		-
Time deposits		160,538		159,874		-		159,874		-
Borrowings		35,613		35,605		-		35,605		-
Accrued interest payable		90		90		-		90		-

	December 31, 2015				Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48,264	$	48,264	$	48,264	$	-	$	-
Available-for-sale securities		6,696		6,696		-		6,268		428
Loans held for sale		2,091		2,091		-		2,091		-
Loans, net		454,833		454,854		-		-		454,854
Accrued interest receivable		1,608		1,608		1,608		-		-
Mortgage servicing rights		3,249		3,249		-		-		3,249
FHLB Stock		2,212		2,212		-		-		2,212
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Non-maturity deposits		271,639		271,639		-		271,639		-
Time deposits		168,385		168,091		-		168,091		-
Borrowings		40,435		40,421		-		40,421		-
Accrued interest payable		72		72		-		72		-

The following table presents the balance of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	Fair Value at June 30, 2016
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Municipal bonds	$	3,554	$	-	$	3,544	$	-
Agency mortgage-backed securities		3,470		-		3,470		-
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities		379		-		-		379
Mortgage servicing rights		3,026		-		-		3,026

	Fair Value at December 31, 2015
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Municipal bonds	$	2,096	$	-	$	2,096	$	-
Agency mortgage-backed securities		4,172		-		4,172		-
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities		428		-		-		428
Mortgage servicing rights		3,249		-		-		3,249

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 nor between Level 2 and Level 3.

18

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table provides a description of the valuation technique, unobservable input, and qualitative information about the unobservable inputs for the Company’s assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2016:

Financial Instrument	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input(s)	Range (Weighted Average)
Mortgage Servicing Rights	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment speed assumption	105-462% (177%)
		Discount rate	8-12% (10%)
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	(8%)

Generally, any significant increases in the constant prepayment rate and discount rate utilized in the fair value measurement of the mortgage servicing rights will result in a negative fair value adjustment (and decrease in the fair value measurement).  Conversely, a decrease in the constant prepayment rate and discount rate will result in a positive fair value adjustment (and increase in the fair value measurement).  An increase in the weighted average life assumptions will result in a decrease in the constant prepayment rate and conversely, a decrease in the weighted average life will result in an increase of the constant prepayment rate.

The following table provides a reconciliation of non-agency mortgage backed securities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Beginning balance, at fair value	$	415		$	496		$	428		$	2,345
OTTI impairment losses		-			-			-			-
Principal payments		(37	)		(26	)		(52	)		(187	)
Sales		-			-			-			(1,702	)
Change in unrealized loss		1			13			3			27
Ending balance, at fair value	$	379		$	483		$	379		$	483

Mortgage servicing rights are measured at fair value using significant unobservable input (Level 3) on a recurring basis and a reconciliation of this asset can be found in Note 6 – Mortgage Servicing Rights.

The following tables present the balance of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at the dates indicated (in thousands):

	Fair Value at June 30, 2016
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
OREO and repossessed assets	$	780	$	-	$	-	$	780
Impaired loans		12,673		-		-		12,673

	Fair Value at December 31, 2015
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
OREO and repossessed assets	$	769	$	-	$	-	$	769
Impaired loans		9,220		-		-		9,220

There were no liabilities carried at fair value, measured on a recurring or nonrecurring basis, at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

The following table provides a description of the valuation technique, observable input, and qualitative information about the unobservable inputs for the Company’s assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2016:

Financial Instrument	Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input(s)	Range (Weighted Average)
OREO	Market approach	Adjustment for differences between comparable sales	5-48% (21%)
Impaired loans	Market approach	Adjustment for differences between comparable sales	0-100% (7%)

19

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

A description of the valuation methodologies used for impaired loans and OREO is as follows:

Impaired Loans - The fair value of collateral dependent loans is based on the current appraised value of the collateral or internally developed models utilizing a calculation of expected discounted cash flows which contain management’s assumptions.

OREO and Repossessed Assets – The fair value of OREO and repossessed assets is based on the current appraised value of the collateral.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and payable, and advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance - The estimated fair value is equal to the carrying amount.

Available-for-sale (“AFS”) Securities – AFS securities are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices, if available.  If quoted market prices are not available, management utilizes third-party pricing services or broker quotations from dealers in the specific instruments.  Level 2 securities include those traded on an active exchange, as well as U.S. government and its agencies securities.  Level 3 securities include private label mortgage-backed securities.

Loans Held for Sale - Residential mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate residential loans is based on whole loan forward prices obtained from government sponsored enterprises. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, loans held for sale were carried at cost, as no impairment was required.

Loans - The estimated fair value for all fixed rate loans is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows using the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and maturities. The estimated fair value for variable rate loans is the carrying amount. The fair value for all loans also takes into account projected loan losses as a part of the estimate.

Mortgage Servicing Rights –The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is determined though a discounted cash flow analysis, which uses interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates,  and delinquency rate assumptions as inputs.

FHLB stock - The estimated fair value is equal to the par value of the stock, which approximates fair value.

Deposits - The estimated fair value of deposit accounts (savings, demand deposit, and money market accounts) is the carrying amount. The fair values of fixed-maturity time certificates of deposit are estimated by discounting the estimated cash flows using the current rate at which similar certificates would be issued.

Borrowings - The fair value of borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Off-balance-sheet financial instruments - The fair value for the Company’s off-balance-sheet loan commitments are estimated based on fees charged to others to enter into similar agreements taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and credit standing of the Company’s customers. The estimated fair value of these commitments is not significant.

We assume interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of our normal operations. As a result, the fair values of our financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change, which may be favorable or unfavorable to us. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent necessary or possible to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed-rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by establishing early withdrawal penalties for certificates of deposit, creating interest rate floors for certain variable rate loans, adjusting terms of new loans and deposits, by borrowing at fixed rates for fixed terms and investing in securities with terms that mitigate our overall interest rate risk.

20

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 6 – Mortgage Servicing Rights

The unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for Federal National Mortgage Association at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, totaled approximately $369.6 million and $360.4 million, respectively, and was not included in the Company’s financial statements. We also service loans for other financial institutions.

A summary of the change in the balance of mortgage servicing rights during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Beginning balance, at fair value	$	3,095		$	2,890		$	3,249		$	3,028
Servicing rights that result from transfers of financial assets		151			214			259			431
Changes in fair value:
Due to changes in model inputs or assumptions(1)		(77	)		352			(190	)		174
Other(2)		(143	)		(185	)		(292	)		(362	)
Ending balance, at fair value	$	3,026		$	3,271		$	3,026		$	3,271

⁽¹⁾ Represents changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates

⁽²⁾ Represents changes due to collection or realization of expected cash flows over time.

The key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of mortgage servicing rights at the dates indicated are as follows:

	At June 30,
	2016			2015
Prepayment speed (Public Securities Association “PSA” model)		223	%		177	%
Weighted-average life (years)		5.8			6.7
Yield to maturity discount rate		10.0	%		10.0	%

The amount of contractually specified servicing, late and ancillary fees earned and recorded in mortgage servicing income on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income was $208,000 and $413,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively and $214,000 and $469,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of operations, the Company engages in a variety of financial transactions that are not recorded in our financial statements.  These transactions involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet credit, interest rate and liquidity risks.  These transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit.

Note 8 – Borrowings and FHLB Stock

The Company utilizes a loan agreement with the FHLB of Seattle. The terms of the agreement call for a blanket pledge of a portion of the Company’s mortgage and commercial and multifamily portfolio based on the outstanding balance.  At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the amount available to borrowunder this credit facility was $180.6 million and $174.0 million, respectively.  At June 30, 2016, the credit facility was collateralized as follows: one- to four- family mortgage loans with a market value of $105.0 million, commercial and multifamily mortgage loans with a market value of $135.6 million and home equity loans with a market value of $7.9 million. The Company had outstanding borrowings under this arrangement of $35.6 million and $40.4 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.  Additionally, the Company had outstanding letters of credit from the FHLB with a notional amount of $43.5 million and $47.5 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively to secure public deposits which exceeded the collateral requirements established by the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission.  The remaining amount available to borrow as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was $101.5 million and $86.1 million, respectively.

As a member of the FHLB system, the Bank is required to maintain a minimum level of investment in FHLB stock based on specific percentages of its outstanding FHLB advances.  At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had an investment of $2.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, in FHLB stock.

The Company participates in the Federal Reserve Bank Borrower-in-Custody program, which gives the Company access to the discount window.  The terms of the program call for a pledge of specific assets.  The Company had unused borrowing capacity of $27.4 million and $25.9 million and no outstanding borrowings under this program at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The Company has access to a Fed Funds line of credit from the Pacific Coast Banker's Bank.  The line has a one-year term maturing on June 30, 2017 and is renewable annually.  The Company had unused borrowing capacity of $2.0 million and no outstanding borrowings under this agreement at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

21

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The Company has access to a Fed Funds line of credit from Zions Bank under a Fed Funds Sweep and Line Agreement dated September 26, 2014.  The agreement allows access to a Fed Funds line of up to $9.0 million and requires the Company to maintain cash balances with Zions Bank of $250,000.  The agreement has no maturity date.  There were no outstanding borrowings on this line of credit at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

Note 9 – Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income (which has been adjusted for distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, reduced for average unallocated ESOP shares and average unvested restricted stock awards. Unvested share-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) at the same rate as common stockholders. Therefore, under the two-class method, the difference in earnings per share is not significant for these participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (such as stock awards and options) were exercised or converted to common stock, or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the Company’s earnings. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period increased for the dilutive effect of unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards. The dilutive effect of the unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards is calculated under the treasury stock method utilizing the average market value of the Company’s stock for the period.

Earnings per share are summarized in the following table (all figures in thousands except earnings per share):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income	$	1,254	$	1,247	$	2,360	$	2,455
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic		2,481		2,511		2,479		2,517
Effect of potentially dilutive common shares(1)		77		91		73		85
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, diluted		2,558		2,602		2,552		2,603
Earnings per share, basic	$	0.51	$	0.50	$	0.95	$	0.98
Earnings per share, diluted	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.92	$	0.94

 ⁽¹⁾ Represents the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of non-participating restricted shares based on the treasury stock method.

There were no anti-dilutive securities at June 30, 2016 or 2015.

22

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 10 – Stock-based Compensation

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

The Company currently has two existing Equity Incentive Plans, a 2008 Equity Inventive Plan (the"2008 Plan") and a 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2013 Plan"), and together with the 2008 Plan, (the "Plans"), both of which were approved by shareholders.  The Plans permit the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, and stock appreciation rights.  Under the 2008 Plan, 126,287 shares of common stock were approved for awards for stock options and stock appreciation rights and 50,514 shares of common stock were approved for awards for restricted stock and restricted stock units.  Under the 2013 Plan, 141,750 shares of common stock were approved for awards for stock options and stock appreciation rights and 56,700 shares of common stock were approved for awards for restricted stock and restricted stock units.

As of June 30, 2016, awards for stock options totaling 233,532 shares and awards for restricted stock totaling 106,630 shares of Company common stock have been granted, net of any forfeitures, to participants in the Plans.  During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, share-based compensation expense totaled $126,000 and $104,000, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, share-based compensation expense totaled $228,000 and $207,000, respectively.

Stock Option Awards

The stock option awards granted to date under the 2008 Plan vest in 20 percent annual increments commencing one year from the grant date in accordance with the requirements of the 2008 Plan.  The stock option awards granted to date under the 2013 Plan vest in equal annual installments over two to four years.  All of the options granted are exercisable for a period of 10 years from the date of grant, subject to vesting.  The following is a summary of the Company's stock option plan awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016:

	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term In Years		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at the beginning of the year		184,407		$	14.47		6.97	$	1,490,009
Granted		10,993		$	22.31
Exercised		(1,077	)	$	15.02
Forfeited		(3,487	)	$	17.23
Expired		-			-
Outstanding at June 30, 2016		190,836		$	14.87		6.63	$	1,732,752
Exercisable		110,772		$	13.08		5.68	$	1,204,575
Expected to vest, assuming a 0% forfeiture rate over the vesting term		80,064		$	17.35		7.95	$	528,177

As of June 30, 2016, there was $463,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans.  The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.5 years.

The fair value of each option award granted is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model.  The assumptions used for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are presented in the table below:

Annual dividend yield		1.03	%
Expected volatility		25.48	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.64	%
Expected term	6.92 years
Weighted-average grant date fair value per option granted	$	5.78

23

SOUND FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Restricted Stock Awards

The fair value of the restricted stock awards is equal to the fair value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant.  Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period that the awards are based. The restricted stock awards granted under the 2008 Plan vest in 20 percent annual increments commencing one year from the grant date in accordance with the requirements of the 2008 plan.  The restricted stock awards granted to date under the 2013 Plan vest in equal annual installments over two to four years.

The following is a summary of the Company’s outstanding restricted stock awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016:

Non-vested Shares	Shares			Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
Non-vested at January 1, 2016		31,553		$	16.32
Granted		11,606			22.31
Vested		(15,962	)		17.59
Forfeited		(1,059	)		17.36
Expired		-			-
Non-vested at June 30, 2016		26,138		$	18.08
Expected to vest assuming a 0% forfeiture rate over the vesting term		26,138		$	18.08

As of June 30, 2016, there was $574,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock granted under the Plan remaining.  The cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average vesting period of 1.53 years.  The total fair value of shares vested for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $345,000 and $240,000, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

In January 2008, the ESOP borrowed $1.2 million from the Company to purchase common stock of the Company.  In August 2012, in conjunction with the Company’s “second step” conversion to become a fully converted public company, the ESOP borrowed $1.1 million from the Company to purchase additional common stock of the Company.  Both loans are being repaid principally by the Bank through contributions to the ESOP over a period of ten years.  The interest rate on the loans is fixed at 4.0% and 2.25%, per annum, respectively.  As of June 30, 2016, the remaining balances of the ESOP loans were $270,000 and $701,000, respectively.

Neither the loan balances nor the related interest expense are reflected on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

At June 30, 2016, the ESOP was committed to release 21,443 shares of the Company’s common stock to participants and held 88,243 unallocated shares remaining to be released in future years.  The fair value of the 188,981 shares of Company common stock held by the ESOP trust was $4.5 million at June 30, 2016.  ESOP compensation expense included in salaries and benefits was $135,000 and $271,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and $102,000 and $204,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Note 11 – Subsequent Event

On July 26, 2016, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.075 per common share, payable August 26, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business August 12, 2016.

On July 26, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 50,000 shares or approximately 2% of the Company’s outstanding shares.  The shares may be purchased in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, from time to time, over a twelve-month period depending upon market conditions and other factors.

24

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and are generally identified by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance or financial items, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding our mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety or range of factors including, but not limited to:

· changes in economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area;

· fluctuations in interest rates;

· the risks of lending and investing activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses;

· the possibility of other-than-temporary impairments of securities held in our securities portfolio;

· our ability to access cost-effective funding;

· fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties, and fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial and multifamily real estate market conditions in our market area;

· secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market;

· our ability to attract and retain deposits;

· our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and expected cost savings and other benefits  within the anticipated time frames or at all;

· legislative or regulatory changes such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and its implementing regulations that adversely affect our business, as well as changes in regulatory policies and principles, or  the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules including changes related to Basel III;

· monetary and fiscal policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) and the U.S. Government and other governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry;

· results of examinations of Sound Financial Bancorp and Sound Community Bank by their regulators, including the possibility that the regulators may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for loan losses or to write-down assets, change Sound Community Bank’s regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, which could adversely affect our  liquidity and earnings;

· increases in premiums for deposit insurance;

25

· our ability to control operating costs and expenses;

· the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation;

· difficulties in reducing risks associated with the loans on our balance sheet;

· staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our workforce and potential associated charges;

· computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach;

· our ability to retain key members of our senior management team;

· costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments;

· our ability to implement our business strategies;

· increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;

· changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

· the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions;

· our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;

· adverse changes in the securities markets;

· the inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;

· changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; and

· other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services and the other risks described from time to time in this Form 10-Q and our 2015 Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC.

We wish to advise readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and that the factors listed above could materially affect our financial performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from any such forward-looking statements expressed with respect to future periods and could negatively affect our stock price performance.

We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

26

General

References in this document to Sound Financial Bancorp refer to Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. and its predecessor, Sound Financial, Inc., a federal corporation, and references to the "Bank" refer to Sound Community Bank.  References to "we," "us," "our" and the Company means Sound Financial Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sound Community Bank, unless the context otherwise requires.

Sound Financial Bancorp, a Maryland corporation, is a bank holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary, Sound Community Bank.  Substantially all of Sound Financial Bancorp's business is conducted through Sound Community Bank, a Washington state-chartered commercial bank.  As a Washington commercial bank, the Bank's regulators are the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions ("WDFI") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC").  The Federal Reserve is the primary federal regulator for Sound Financial Bancorp.

Sound Community Bank's deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC.  At June 30, 2016, Sound Financial Bancorp had total consolidated assets of $541.8 million, net loans of $459.8 million, deposits of $443.9 million and stockholders' equity of $56.8 million.  The shares of Sound Financial Bancorp are traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "SFBC."  Our executive offices are located at 2005 5^th Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, Washington, 98121.

Our principal business consists of attracting retail and commercial deposits from the general public and investing those funds, along with borrowed funds, in loans secured by first and second mortgages on one- to four-family residences (including home equity loans and lines of credit), commercial and multifamily, consumer and commercial business loans and construction and land loans.  We offer a variety of secured and unsecured consumer loan products, including manufactured home loans, floating home loans, automobile loans, boat loans and recreational vehicle loans.  As part of our business, we focus on residential mortgage loan originations, many of which we sell to Fannie Mae.  We sell the majority of these loans with servicing retained to maintain the direct customer relationship and to continue providing quality customer service to our borrowers.  We also originate loans which do not conform to the underwriting standards of Fannie Mae (“non-conforming”) to be held in our loan portfolio and for sale with servicing released.  We originate and retain a significant amount of commercial real estate loans, including those secured by owner-occupied and non owner-occupied commercial real estate, multifamily property, manufactured home parks and construction and land development loans.

Critical Accounting Policies

Certain of our accounting policies are important to an understanding of our financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain.  Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances.  Facts and circumstances that could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the economy and changes in the financial condition of borrowers.  Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, accounting for other-than-temporary impairment of securities, accounting for mortgage servicing rights, accounting for other real estate owned and accounting for deferred income taxes.  Our methodologies for analyzing the allowance for loan losses,  other than other-then-temporary impairment, mortgage servicing rights, other real estate owned and deferred tax asset accounts are described in our 2015 Form 10-K.  There have been no significant changes in the Company’s application of accounting policies since December 31, 2015.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015

General.   Total assets increased $1.0 million, or 0.2%, to $541.8 million at June 30, 2016 from $540.8 million at December 31, 2015.  This increase was primarily the result of a $5.0 million, or 1.1%, increase in the net loan portfolio, partially offset by a $3.1 million, or 6.4%, decrease in cash and cash equivalents and a $1.4 million decrease in loans held for sale.  The decline in the cash and cash equivalents, along with the $3.8 million, or 0.9%, increase in deposits was primarily used to fund $5.2 million loan growth and to pay down in borrowings which declined $4.8 million or 11.9% from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016.

Cash and Securities.  Cash and cash equivalents decreased $3.1 million, or 6.4%, to $45.2 million at June 30, 2016 from $48.3 million at December 31, 2015. Available-for-sale securities, which consist primarily of agency mortgage-backed securities, increased $697,000, or 10.4%, from $6.7 million at December 31, 2015 to $7.4 million at June 30, 2016 as a result of purchases of municipal bonds of $1.3 million, partially offset by principal repayments on securities during the second quarter.

Loans.  Our gross loan portfolio increased $5.2 million, or 1.1%, to $466.4 million at June 30, 2016 from $461.2 million at December 31, 2015.

The following table reflects the changes in the types of loans in our portfolio at June 30, 2016, as compared to December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		Amount Change			Percent Change
One-to-four-family	$	149,874	$	141,125	$	8,749			6.2	%
Home equity		31,804		31,573		231			0.7
Commercial and multifamily		164,916		175,312		(10,396	)		(5.9	)
Construction and land		57,792		57,043		749			1.3
Manufactured homes		15,114		13,798		1,316			9.5
Other Consumer		24,953		23,030		1,923			8.3
Commercial business		21,967		19,295		2,672			13.8
Total loans, before deferred fees and allowance for loan losses	$	466,420	$	461,176		5,244			1.1	%

27

The increases in our loan portfolio were primarily a result of our loan production exceeding loan repayments .  At June 30, 2016, our loan portfolio remained well-diversified with commercial and multifamily real estate loans accounting for 35.4% of the portfolio.  One-to-four-family loans account for 32.1% of the portfolio.  Home equity, manufactured and other consumer loans account for 15.4% of the portfolio.  Construction and land loans account for 12.4% of the portfolio and commercial business loans account for the remaining 4.7% of total loans.

Loans held for sale decreased $1.4 million, or 67.1%, to $687,000 at June 30, 2016 from $2.1 million at December 31, 2015. The decrease in loans held for sale was a result of the timing of originations and sales between the two period ending dates.

Mortgage Servicing Rights.  At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in mortgage servicing rights recorded at fair value.We record mortgage servicing rights on loans sold to Fannie Mae and other financial institutions with servicing retained and upon acquisition of a servicing portfolio.  We stratify our capitalized mortgage servicing rights based on the type, term and interest rates of the underlying loans.  Mortgage servicing rights are carried at fair value.  If the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights fluctuates significantly, our financial results could be materially impacted.

Nonperforming Assets.  At June 30, 2016, nonperforming assets totaled $5.3 million, or 0.97% of total assets, compared to $2.9 million, or 0.54% of total assets at December 31, 2015.

The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of nonperforming assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

	Nonperforming Assets
	At June 30, 2016		At December 31, 2015		Amount Change			Percent Change
Nonaccrual loans	$	3,777	$	1,528	$	2,249			147.19	%
Accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent		-		117		(117	)	Nm
Nonperforming TDRs		705		485		(230	)		(32.62	)
Total nonperforming loans		4,482		2,130		2,352			114.57
OREO and repossessed assets		780		769		11			1.43
Total nonperforming assets	$	5,262	$	2,899	$	2,363			81.51	%

Nonperforming loans, consisting of nonaccrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent and nonperforming TDRs, increased to $4.5 million, or 0.96% of total loans at June 30, 2016 from $2.1 million or 0.47% of total loans, at December 31, 2015.  This increase reflects the inclusion of a $2.3 million multifamily loan in Port Angeles, WA in nonaccrual loans during the six months ended June 30, 2016.  The loan, while currently performing, was transferred into nonaccrual in the second quarter due to the uncertainty of full collection.  At June 30, 2016, we had a specific reserve of $387,000 on this credit to reflect impairment based on recent collateral valuation.

OREO and repossessed assets decreased due to the sale of three properties in the portfolio.  During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we repossessed one manufactured home valued at $18,000 and we sold a parcel of land valued at $124,000.  The aggregate gain on all sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was $8,000 and $0, respectively.  The gain on sales of properties was offset by expenses related to OREO properties.  Our largest OREO at June 30, 2016 consisted of a commercial building with a recorded value of $600,000 located in Clallam County, Washington that we acquired as a part of the the Columbia Bank branch purchase.  Our next largest OREO property is a $170,000 one- to four- family property located in Clallam County, Washington.

Allowance for Loan Losses.  Our allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2016 was $4.8 million, or 1.04% of total loans receivable compared to $4.6 million, or 1.01% of total loans receivable at December 31, 2015.  The allowance for loan losses is maintained to cover losses that are probable and can be estimated on the date of evaluation in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.  It is our best estimate of probable credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio.  The increase in the allowance for loan losses compared to December 31, 2015 was primarily due to increased loan balances and the increase in non-performing loans.

28

The following table reflects the adjustments in our allowance during the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

	At and For the						At and For the
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Balance at beginning of period	$	4,709		$	4,436		$	4,636		$	4,387
Charge-offs		(39	)		(75	)		(122	)		(139	)
Recoveries:		68			11			74			24
Net Recoveries (charge-offs)		29			(64	)		(48	)		(115	)
Provisions charged to operations		100			200			250			300
Balance at end of period	$	4,838		$	4,572		$	4,838		$	4,572
Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) during the period to average loans outstanding during the period		(0.02	)%		0.06	%		0.02	%		0.05	%

	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Allowance as a percentage of nonperforming loans		107.94	%		217.65	%
Allowance as a percentage of total loans (end of period)		1.04			1.01

Specific loan loss reserves increased to $1.3 million at June 30, 2016 compared to $882,000 at December 31, 2015, while general loan loss reserves decreased to $3.5 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $3.8 million at December 31, 2015.  The increase in specific loan loss reserves was primarily due to the inclusion of a $2.3 million multifamily loan in Port Angeles, WA during the six months ended June 30, 2016.  This is our largest nonperforming loan as of June 30, 2016. The specific reserve for this loan is $389,000, which management believes is adequate to cover the expected loss on this loan. The decrease in general loan loss reserves was due to lower historical loss rates.  Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were $48,000, or 0.02%, of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $115,000, or 0.05% of average loans on an annualized basis for the same period in 2015.  The decrease in net charge-offs was primarily due to improving economic conditions in our market area and continued efforts in credit administration.  As of June 30, 2016, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans receivable and nonperforming loans was 1.04% and 107.94%, respectively, compared to 1.01% and 217.65%, respectively, at December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans decreased due to a $2.3 million increase in nonperforming loans to $4.5 million at June 30, 2016 from $2.1 million at December 31, 2015.  This decrease was primarily due to the transfer of a $2.3 million multifamily loan in Port Angeles, WA to nonaccrual status during the six months ended June 30, 2016 as discussed above.

Deposits.  Total deposits increased $3.8 million, or 0.9%, to $443.9 million at June 30, 2016 from $440.0 million at December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of a $3.0 million, or 2.3%, increase in interest-bearing demand accounts, an $8.5 million, or 17.8% increase in noninterest-bearing demand accounts, and a $1.7 million, or 4.3%, increase in savings accounts.  These increases were partially offset by a $1.1 million, or 2.1%, decrease in money market accounts and an $8.3 million, or 4.9%, decrease in certificates of deposit.  The increases were the result of retail sales efforts during the period as we continued our emphasis on attracting low-cost core deposit accounts.  The decrease in money market accounts was primarily the result of some customers shifting these funds into interest-bearing demand accounts.  The decrease in certificate of deposit accounts was primarily due to a decrease in public funds.

A summary of deposit accounts with the corresponding weighted average cost of funds is presented below (dollars in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2016					As of December 31, 2015
	Amount		Wtd. Avg. Rate			Amount		Wtd. Avg. Rate
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	56,621		0.00	%	$	48,067		0.00	%
Interest-bearing demand		130,379		0.42			127,392		0.42
Savings		40,486		0.21			38,833		0.18
Money market		52,919		0.20			54,046		0.16
Certificates		160,539		1.13	(1)		168,880		1.22	(1)
Escrow		2,923		0.00			2,806		0.00
Total deposits	$	443,867		0.55	(1)	$	440,024		0.63	(1)

⁽¹⁾ Includes the amortization expense from the deposit premium paid on the purchase of deposits from Columbia State Bank in the third quarter of 2015.

Borrowings.  FHLB advances decreased $4.8 million, or 11.9%, to $35.6 million at June 30, 2016, with a weighted-average cost of 0.55%, from $40.4 million at December 31, 2015, with a weighted-average cost of 0.39%.  The increase in average borrowing rate was due to a greater percentage of short term borrowings in the current period compared to December 31, 2015, as well as an increase to the overnight borrowing rate with the FHLB.  We rely on FHLB advances to fund interest-earning assets when deposits alone cannot fully fund interest-earning asset growth.  This reliance on borrowings, rather than deposits, may increase our overall cost of funds.

29

Stockholders' Equity.  Total stockholders' equity increased $2.3 million, or 4.2%, to $56.8 million at June 30, 2016 from $54.5 million at December 31, 2015.  This increase primarily reflects $2.4 million in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, partially offset by the payment of cash dividends of $372,000 to common stockholders.

Comparison of Results of Operation for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

General.  Net income was $1.3 million, or $0.49 per diluted common share, for the three months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $7,000 from the three months ended June 30, 2015.  The primary reasons for the increase in net income during the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period last year was an increase in net interest income, which was partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense and decrease in the fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights.  Net income decreased $95,000 to $2.4 million, or $0.92 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $2.5 million, or $0.94 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  The primary reasons for the decrease in net income during the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period last year was an increase in noninterest expense, and decreases to the fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights and gain on sale of loans. These decreases were partially offset by higher net interest income and a lower provision for loan losses.

Interest Income.  Interest income increased $733,000, or 13.5%, to $6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $5.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015.  Interest income increased $1.4 million, or 13.0%, to $12.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $10.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  The increases in interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily reflect the increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets and a higher weighted average yield on earning assets in the current period.

Our weighted average yield on interest-earning assets was 4.78% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 4.70% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.  The weighted average yield on loans increased to 5.17% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, from 5.01% and 4.97% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.  The weighted average yield on available-for-sale securities (including OTTI) was 0.83% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 0.62% and 0.70% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.  The increase in the average yields for both the interest bearing cash and the securities portfolio was due to the increase in the federal funds rate in December 2015 from 0.25% to 0.50%.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased $29,000, or 4.3%, to $709,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $680,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015.  Interest expense increased $57,000, or 4.2%, to $1.43 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $1.37 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. We also had a $15.1 million and a $19.7 million increase in the average balances of FHLB advances for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the same period ended June 30, 2015.Our weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 0.66% and 0.68% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to 0.70% and 0.71% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Interest expense on deposits decreased $7,000, or 1.1%, to $654,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $661,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015.  Interest expense on deposits increased $20,000, or 1.5%, to $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  These increases resulted from higher average balances of interest-bearing deposits outstanding in the period.  Our weighted average cost of deposits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was 0.59% and 0.60%, respectively, as compared to 0.63% and 0.64% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.  The decrease in average rates during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily a result of the re-pricing of matured certificates of deposit.

Interest expense on borrowings increased $36,000, or 189.5%, to $55,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $19,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015.  Interest expense on borrowings increased $37,000, or 78.7%, to $84,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $47,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  The increases were a result of an increase in our average cost of borrowings to 0.55% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to 0.50% and 0.48% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, reflecting the December 2015 increase in the federal funds rate.

Net Interest Income.  Net interest income increased $704,000 or 14.9%, to $5.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $4.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015.  Net interest income increased $1.3 million, or 14.2 %, to $10.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $9.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  The increase for three and six months ended June 30, 2016 resulted from increased interest income due to higher average loan balances.  Our average yield on loans receivable increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same periods last year as new loan originations are pricing higher than pay downs and paid loans.  Our net interest margin was 4.26% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to 4.11% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Provision for Loan Losses.  We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to earnings, at a level required to reflect management’s best estimate of the probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio.  In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss experience, the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect borrowers’ ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, peer group data, prevailing economic conditions, and current factors.  Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as one-to four-family, small commercial and multifamily, home equity and consumer loans, are evaluated in the aggregate using historical loss factors adjusted for current economic conditions and other relevant data.  Loans for which management has concerns about the borrowers’ ability to repay, are evaluated individually, and specific loss allocations are provided for these loans when necessary.

Provision for loan losses totaled $100,000 and $250,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to a provision of $200,000 and $300,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.  The reduced provision  primarily reflects a decline in loan charge-offs and lower historical loss ratios, which were partially offset by higher average loan balances and changes in the composition of our loan portfolio.

30

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the annualized percentage of net recoveries to average loans was 0.02%, compared to net charge-offs of 0.06% for the three months ended June 30, 2015.  For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the annualized percentage of net charge-offs to average loans decreased to 0.02%, from 0.05% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans increased to 0.96% at June 30, 2016 from 0.46% at June 30, 2015. This increase reflects the inclusion, as discussed above, of a $2.3 million multifamily loan in Port Angeles, WA as a nonaccrual loan as of June 30, 2016.

While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, the determination of the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the adjustment of reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Noninterest Income.  Noninterest income decreased $496,000, or 29.1%, to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as reflected below (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Amount			Percent
	2016			2015		Change			Change
Service charges and fee income	$	652		$	671	$	(19	)		(2.8	)%
Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI		84			84		-			-
Mortgage servicing income		209			214		(5	)		(2.3	)
Fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights		(76	)		347		(423	)		(121.9	)
Net gain on sale of loans		341			390		(49	)		(12.6	)
Total noninterest income	$	1,210		$	1,706	$	(496	)		(29.1	)%

The primary reason for the decrease in noninterest income during the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period last year was the change in the fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights.  The decrease in gain on sale of loans was primarily reflective of lower volume of loans sold and secondarily lower average premiums on loans sold.

Noninterest income decreased $690,000, or 24.0%, to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as reflected below (dollars in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Amount			Percent
	2016			2015			Change			Change
Service charges and fee income	$	1,245		$	1,316		$	(71	)		(5.4	)%
Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI		168			168			-			-
Mortgage servicing income		413			469			(56	)		(11.9	)
Fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights		(190	)		169			(359	)		(212.4	)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses		-			(31	)		31			nm
Net gain on sale of loans		551			786			(235	)		(29.9	)
Total noninterest income	$	2,187		$	2,877		$	(690	)		(24.0	)%

NM-not meaningful.

The primary reason for the decrease in noninterest income during the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period last year was the negative change in the fair value adjustment on the mortgage servicing rights and the decrease in gain on sale of loans.  The change in the fair value adjustment on mortgage servicing rights was primarily a result of the duration on the underlying loans being projected to shorten due to lower interest rates and increased refinance activity. The decrease in gain on sale of loans was primarily reflective of a lower volume of loans sold as well as a lower average premium on loans sold.  Mortgage servicing income and services charges and fee income also decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period the prior year.  The decrease in service charges and fee income was due to lower loan origination fees.  The decrease in mortgage servicing income was due to the turnover in the mortgage servicing portfolio and the rates associated with loans paid off and originated.

Noninterest Expense.  Noninterest expense increased $257,000, or 5.8%, to $4.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $4.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2016, as reflected below (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Amount			Percent
	2016		2015		Change			Change
Salaries and benefits	$	2,618	$	2,205	$	413			18.7	%
Operations		1,084		1,053		31			2.9
Regulatory assessments		125		230		(105	)		(45.7	)
Occupancy		380		448		(68	)		(15.2	)
Data processing		444		454		(10	)		(2.2	)
Losses and expenses on OREO and repossessed assets		6		10		(4	)		(40.0	)
Total noninterest expense	$	4,657	$	4,400	$	257			5.8	%

31

The increase in noninterest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period last year was primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits expense and, to a lesser extent, an increase in operations expense.  Salaries and benefits expense increased primarily due to an increase in full time equivalent employees during the current period compared to the same period last year.  Operations expense increased due to higher depreciation, credit administration costs, and general administration expenses.  These increases were partially offset by decreases in regulatory assessments, occupancy expense and data processing expense.   Regulatory assessments decreased due, in part, to lower fees paid to the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions.  Occupancy expense declined due to higher maintenance costs in the same period last year.  Data processing expense decreased due to vendor management and contract renewals.

Noninterest expense increased $694,000, or 8.2%, to $9.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $8.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015, as reflected below (dollars in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Amount			Percent
	2016		2015		Change			Change
Salaries and benefits	$	5,181	$	4,460	$	721			16.2	%
Operations		2,056		1,957		99			5.1
Regulatory assessments		280		296		(16	)		(5.4	)
Occupancy		765		773		(8	)		(1.0	)
Data processing		830		856		(26	)		(3.0	)
Losses and expenses on OREO and repossessed assets		6		82		(76	)		(92.7	)
Total noninterest expense	$	9,118	$	8,424	$	694			8.2	%

The increase in noninterest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period last year was primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits expense and, to a lesser degree, operations expense.  Salaries and benefits expense increased primarily due to an increase in full time equivalent employees during the period and higher medical benefit expense.  Operations expense increased due to higher depreciation, credit administration and general administration expense.  These increases were partially offset by decreases in losses and expenses on OREO and repossessed assets, data processing expenses and regulatory assessments.  Losses and expenses on OREO and repossessed assets decreased primarily to lower levels of OREO and other repossessed assets during the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period last year and improving values for real estate in the markets where we lend.  Data processing decreased primarily due to the impact of vendor management and contract renewal negotiations. Regulatory assessments decreased, due in part, to lower fees paid to the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions.

The efficiency ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was 69.51%, compared to 68.21% for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and was 69.88% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 67.36% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  The increase in the efficiency ratio was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits, operations expense and lower noninterest income, partially offset by higher net interest income.

Income Tax Expense.   For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred income tax expense of $633,000 and $1.2 million on our pre-tax income as compared to $589,000 and $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.  The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were 33.6% and 34.0%, respectively.  The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were 32.1% and 31.3%, respectively.

32

Liquidity

The Management Discussion and Analysis in Item 7 of the Company’s 2015 Form 10-K contains an overview of Sound Financial Bancorp’s and the Bank’s liquidity management, sources of liquidity and cash flows.  This discussion updates that disclosure for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

The Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and borrowings.  While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.  The Bank’s primary investing activity is loan originations.  The Bank maintains liquidity levels it believes to be adequate to fund loan commitments, investment opportunities, deposit withdrawals and other financial commitments.  At June 30, 2016, the Bank had $52.6 million in cash and investment securities available for sale and $687,000 in loans held for sale generally available for its cash needs.  Also, based on existing collateral pledged, the Bank had the ability to borrow an additional $101.5 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, $27.4 million through the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window, $9.0 million through a Fed Funds line at Zions Bank and $2.0 million through a Fed Funds line at Pacific Coast Banker’s Bank.  The Bank uses these sources of funds primarily to meet ongoing commitments, pay maturing deposits and fund withdrawals, and to fund loan commitments.  At June 30, 2016, outstanding loan commitments, including unused lines and letters of credit totaled $66.7 million.  Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less at June 30, 2016, totaled $95.8 million.  Based on our competitive pricing, we believe that a majority of maturing deposits will remain with the Bank.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $3.1 million to $45.2 million as of June 30, 2016, from $48.3 million as of December 31, 2015.  Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.  Net cash of $5.9 million was used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and consisted principally of investment purchase and loan originations, net of principal repayments.  The $1.4 million of cash used by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily a result of a $3.8 million net increase in deposits offset by a $4.8 million decrease in FHLB advances.

As a separate legal entity from the Bank, Sound Financial Bancorp must provide for its own liquidity.  At June 30, 2016, Sound Financial Bancorp, on an unconsolidated basis, had $468,000 in cash, noninterest-bearing deposits and liquid investments generally available for its cash needs.  Sound Financial Bancorp’s principal source of liquidity is dividends from the Bank.

Except as set forth above, management is not aware of any trends, events, or uncertainties that will have, or that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on liquidity, capital resources or operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Activities

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that are not recorded in our financial statements.  These transactions involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet credit, interest rate and liquidity risks.  These transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit.  For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we engaged in no off-balance sheet transactions likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

A summary of our off-balance sheet loan commitments at June 30, 2016, is as follows (in thousands):

Off-balance sheet loan commitments:	At June 30, 2016
Residential mortgage commitments	$	7,918
Undisbursed portion of loans originated		34,011
Unused lines of credit		24,624
Irrevocable letters of credit		185
Total loan commitments	$	66,738

33

Capital

Sound Community Bank is subject to minimum capital requirements imposed by regulations of the FDIC.  Effective January 1, 2015 (with some changes transitioned into full effectiveness over two to four years), the Bank became subject to new minimum capital adequacy adopted by the FDIC, which creates a new required ratio for common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital, increases the leverage and Tier 1 capital ratios, changes the risk-weightings of certain assets for purposes of the risk-based capital ratios, creates an additional capital conservation buffer over the required capital ratios and changes what qualifies as capital for purposes of meeting these various capital requirements.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by bank regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. The Bank is also required to maintain additional levels of CET1 over the minimum risk-based capital levels before it may pay dividends, repurchase shares or pay discretionary bonuses.

The new minimum requirements are a ratio of CET1 to total risk-weighted assets ("CET1 risk-based ratio") of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, a total capital ratio of 8.0%, and a leverage ratio of 4.0%.

In addition to the capital requirements, there are a number of changes in what constitutes regulatory capital, subject to a certain transition periods.  These changes include the phasing-out of certain instruments as qualifying capital.  The Bank does not have any of these instruments.  Mortgage servicing and deferred tax assets over designated percentages of CET1 are be deducted from capital, subject to a transition period ending December 31, 2017.  CET1 consists of Tier 1 capital less all capital components that are not considered common equity.  In addition, Tier 1 capital includes accumulated other comprehensive income, which includes all unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities, subject to a transition period end December 31, 2017.  Because of our asset size, we are not are considered an "advanced approaches banking organization" and have elected to permanently opt-out of the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities in our capital calculations.

The new requirements also include changes in the risk-weighting of assets to better reflect credit risk and other risk exposure.  These include a 150% risk weight (up from 100%) for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans and for non-residential mortgage loans that are 90 days past due or otherwise in nonaccrual status; a 20% (up from 0%) credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable (currently set at 0%); and a 250% risk weight (up from 100%) for mortgage servicing and deferred tax assets that are not deducted from capital.

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1 and total capital ratios, the Bank will be required to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.  This new capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented in January 2019.

Under the new standards, in order to be considered well-capitalized, the Bank must have to have a CET1 risk-based ratio of 6.5% (new), a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 8% (increased from 6%), a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% (unchanged) and a leverage ratio of 5% (unchanged).

Based on its capital levels at June 30, 2016, Sound Community Bank exceeded these requirements as of that date.  Consistent with our goals to operate a sound and profitable organization, our policy is to maintain a "well-capitalized" status as Sound Community Bank under the regulatory capital categories of the FDIC.  Based on capital levels at June 30, 2016, Sound Community Bank was considered to be well-capitalized under applicable regulatory requirements.  Management monitors the capital levels to provide for current and future business opportunities and to maintain Sound Community Bank's "well-capitalized" status.

The actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios calculated for Sound Community Bank at June 30, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio
As of June 30, 2016
Tier 1 Capital to average assets	$	55,239		10.14	%	$	21,801	>4.0	%		$	27,252	>5.0	%
Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	$	55,239		12.80	%	$	19,424	> 4.5	%		$	28,057	>6.5	%
Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets	$	55,239		12.80	%	$	25,899	>6.0	%		$	34,532	>8.0	%
Total Capital to risk-weighted assets	$	60,232		13.95	%	$	34,532	>8.0	%		$	43,165	>10.00	%

34

For a bank holding company with less than $1.0 billion in assets, the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis and the Federal Reserve expects the holding company's subsidiary banks to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations.  If Sound Financial Bancorp was subject to regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies with $1.0 billion or more in assets, at June 30, 2016 Sound Financial Bancorp would have exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.  The estimated regulatory capital ratios calculated for Sound Financial Bancorp as of June 30, 2016 were 10.32% for Tier 1 leverage-based capital, 13.03% for both Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 Capital to risk-based assets and 14.19% for total risk-based capital.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company provided information about market risk in Item 7A of its 2015 Form 10-K.  There have been no material changes in our market risk since our 2015 Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a -15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act")), as of June 30, 2016, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company's senior management. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is: (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company's management (including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

We intend to continually review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and to improve the Company’s controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. The goal is to ensure that senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning the Company's business. While we believe the present design of the disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve this goal, future events affecting our business may cause the Company to modify its disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a - 15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

35

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, the Company occasionally becomes involved in various legal proceedings.  In the opinion of management, any liability from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A Risk Factors

Not required; the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and use of Proceeds

Nothing to report

Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Nothing to report.

Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Nothing to report.

36

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibits:
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on March 27, 2012 (File No. 333-180385))
3.2	Bylaws of Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on March 27, 2012 (File No. 333-180385))
4.0	Form of Common Stock Certificate of Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on March 27, 2012 (File No. 333-180385))
10.1	Employment Agreement by and between Sound Community Bank and Laura Lee Stewart (incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on September 20, 2007 (File No. 333-146196))
10.2	Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement by and between Sound Community Bank and Laura Lee Stewart (incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 27, 2015 (File No. 001-35633))
10.3	Amended and Restated Long Term Compensation Agreement by and between Sound Community Bank and Laura Lee Stewart (incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 27, 2015 (File No. 001-35633))
10.4	Amended and Restated Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between Sound Community Bank and Laura Lee Stewart (incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 27, 2015 (File No. 001-35633))
10.5	2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009 (File No. 000-52889))
10.6	Forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement, Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement and Restricted Stock Agreements under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 29, 2009 (File No. 000-52889))
10.7	Summary of Annual Bonus Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on September 20, 2007 (File No. 333-146196))
10.8	2013 Equity Inventive Plan (included as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2013 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 001-35633))
10.9	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement, Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement and Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (included as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 001-35633))
10.10	Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement dated June 21, 2016, by and among Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc., Sound Community Bank and Matthew P. Deines (incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 24, 2016 (File No. 001-35633))
10.10	Form of Separation Agreement and Release of All Claims dated May 11, 2016, by and among Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc., Sound Community Bank and Kelli Nielson (incorporated herein by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2016 (File No. 001-35633))
11	Statement re computation of per share earnings (See Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1, Part I of this Current Report on Form 10-Q.)
31.1	Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer)
31.2	Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer)
32	Section 1350 Certification
101	Interactive Data Files

37

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

			Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc.
Date:	August 12, 2016	By:	/s/  Laura Lee Stewart
			Laura Lee Stewart
			President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	August 12, 2016	By:	/s/  Matthew P. Deines
			Matthew P. Deines
			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

38