XML 67 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurements requires judgment and may affect the valuation of the assets and liabilities being measured and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company uses appropriate valuation techniques based on available inputs to measure the fair values of its assets and liabilities.

Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets as of the reporting date.

Level 2 - Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. These are inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company estimates the fair values of proved oil and natural gas properties assumed in business combinations using discounted cash flow techniques and based on market assumptions as to the future commodity prices, internal estimates of future quantities of oil and natural gas reserves, future estimated rates of production, expected recovery rates and risk-adjustment discounts. The estimated fair values of unevaluated oil and natural gas properties were based on the location, engineering and geological studies, historical well performance, and applicable mineral lease terms. Given the unobservable nature of the inputs, the estimated fair values of oil and natural gas properties assumed is deemed to use Level 3 inputs. The asset retirement obligations assumed as part of business combinations are estimated using the same assumptions and methodology as described below.

The Company estimates asset retirement obligations pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Codification Topic 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations”. The initial measurement of asset retirement obligations at fair value is calculated using discounted cash flow techniques and based on internal estimates of future retirement costs associated with the future plugging and abandonment of wells and related facilities. Given the unobservable nature of the inputs, including plugging costs and useful lives, the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation liability is deemed to use Level 3 inputs. See Note 8—Asset Retirement Obligations for further discussion of the Company’s asset retirement obligations.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are reported at fair value on a recurring basis, including the Company’s derivative instruments and Viper’s cost method investment. The fair value of Viper’s investment is determined using quoted market prices. These valuations are Level 1 inputs. The fair values of the Company’s fixed price swaps, fixed price basis swaps and costless collars are measured internally using established commodity futures price strips for the underlying commodity provided by a reputable third party, the contracted notional volumes, and time to maturity. These valuations are Level 2 inputs.

The following table provides fair value measurement information for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
 
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
 
(in millions)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment
$
19

$

$

 
$
14

$

$

Fixed price swaps
$

$
26

$

 
$

$
216

$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed price swaps
$

$

$

 
$

$

$


The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of Viper’s cost method investment during the periods presented:
 
(in millions)
Value at December 31, 2018
$
14

Gain on investment
5

Value at December 31, 2019
$
19

 
 
Value at December 31, 2017
$
34

Impact of adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-01
(19
)
Loss on investment
(1
)
Value at December 31, 2018
$
14



Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The following table provides the fair value of financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets:
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Carrying
 
 
 
Carrying
 
 
 
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
(in thousands)
Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revolving credit facility
$
13

 
$
13

 
$
1,490

 
$
1,490

4.625% Notes due 2021
399

 
411

 
400

 
393

7.320% Medium-term Notes, Series A, due 2022
21

 
22

 
20

 
21

2.875% Senior Notes due 2024(1)
992

 
1,012

 

 

4.750% Senior Notes due 2024(1)

 

 
1,236

 
1,204

5.375% Senior Notes due 2025(1)
799

 
840

 
799

 
782

3.250% Senior Notes due 2026(1)
792

 
812

 

 

7.350% Medium-term Notes, Series A, due 2027
11

 
12

 
10

 
11

7.125% Medium-term Notes, Series B, due 2028
108

 
116

 
100

 
102

3.500% Senior Notes due 2029(1)
1,186

 
1,226

 

 

Viper revolving credit facility
97

 
97

 
411

 
411

Viper's 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027
490

 
521

 

 

Rattler revolving credit facility
424

 
424

 

 

DrillCo Agreement
$
39

 
$
39

 
$

 
$


(1)
The carrying value includes associated deferred loan costs and any discount.

The fair value of the revolving credit facility, the Viper credit agreement and the Rattler credit agreement approximates their carrying value based on borrowing rates available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and maturities and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Senior Notes and the Energen Notes was determined using the December 31, 2019 quoted market price, a Level 1 classification in the fair value hierarchy.