XML 38 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Description of Business and Other Disclosures (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Interim Financial Statements

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and the Exchange Act. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to keep the information presented from being misleading. The financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K. Financial information as of March 31, 2019 and for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 included in the consolidated financial statements has been derived from our unaudited financial statements. Financial information as of December 31, 2018 has been derived from our audited financial statements and notes thereto as of that date.

Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019. Our business exhibits seasonality due to our wholesale and retail sites being located in certain geographic areas that are affected by seasonal weather and temperature trends and associated changes in retail customer activity during different seasons. Historically, sales volumes have been highest in the second and third quarters (during the summer activity months) and lowest during the winter months in the first and fourth quarters.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results and outcomes could differ from those estimates and assumptions. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances could result in revised estimates and assumptions.

New Accounting Guidance Adopted

New Accounting Guidance Adopted – Lease Accounting

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02–Leases (Topic 842). This standard modifies existing guidance for reporting organizations that enter into leases to increase transparency by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This guidance was effective for us on January 1, 2019.

We elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which allows us to not reassess: 1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; 2) lease classifications for any expired or existing leases; and 3) initial direct costs for any existing leases. We also elected the practical expedient to not assess whether existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases under ASC 840 are or contain a lease under ASC 842. We did not elect the hindsight practical expedient and thus did not reassess the lease term for existing leases. We did not elect the practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components for any classes of assets. We made an accounting policy election to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with an initial term of one year or less. We elected the modified retrospective transition method as permitted by ASU 2018-10 and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to equity effective January 1, 2019.

There was no impact from the adoption of this ASU on the accounting for our capital (now called finance) lease obligations.

Since our previous sale-leaseback transactions were accounted for as failed sale-leasebacks, we are required to reassess these leases under the new guidance as part of adopting ASC 842. We concluded that control, including the significant risks and rewards of ownership, transferred to the buyer-lessor at the inception of each sale-leaseback transaction, and as a result these leasing transactions do not represent financing obligations under ASC 842. Therefore, these leases are accounted for as operating leases under the new guidance and the $42.0 million of net property and equipment and $76.1 million of sale-leaseback financing obligations recorded on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 were removed as part of our transition adjustment effective January 1, 2019. In addition, $5.2 million of deferred tax assets relating to the failed sale-leasebacks were removed from the balance sheet as part of our transition adjustment.

In order to measure our lease liability under our leases as lessee, we are required to discount our minimum rental payments using the rate implicit in the lease, unless such rate cannot be readily determined, in which case our incremental borrowing rate is used. As we do not know the amount of our lessors’ initial direct costs, we are generally unable to determine the rate implicit in our leases. As a result, we generally use our incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate we would have to pay to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments on a collateralized basis over a similar term in a similar economic environment. We considered the rates we paid in previous financing and sale-leaseback transactions, the rates on our borrowings under our prior secured revolving credit facility and mortgage rates on commercial properties for various terms in developing our incremental borrowing rates. See Note 7 for a discussion of the New Credit Agreement (as defined below) we entered into on April 1, 2019.

Effective January 1, 2019, we recognized right-of-use assets related to operating leases, inclusive of direct costs of entering leases and below market lease intangible assets and net of deferred rent expense and above market lease liabilities, totaling $133.3 million. We recorded lease liabilities related to operating leases, including related to the sale-leaseback transactions noted above, totaling $135.9 million.

The net adjustment recorded to equity as of January 1, 2019 was a credit of $28.9 million.

The table below summarizes these adjustments to the January 1, 2019 balance sheet (in millions).

			Remove
			sale-			Record		Balance
			leaseback			ROU asset/		sheet
	As Reported		balances			lease liability		reclasses			As Adjusted
Property and equipment, net	$	647.4	$	(42.0	)	$	—	$	—		$	605.4
Right-of-use assets, net		—		—			135.9		(2.6	)		133.3
Intangible assets, net		59.1		—			—		(1.0	)		58.1

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		17.9		(1.1	)		—		—			16.8
Current portion of operating lease obligations		—		—			24.3		—			24.3
Operating lease obligations, less current portion		—		—			111.6		—			111.6
Deferred tax liabilities, net		19.9		5.2			—		—			25.1
Other long-term liabilities		95.6		(75.0	)		—		(3.6	)		17.0
Equity		110.9		28.9			—		—			139.8

Since we are not restating prior periods as part of adopting this guidance, our results for the three months ended March 31, 2019 are not directly comparable to our results for periods before January 1, 2019. Specifically, payments on our failed sale-leaseback obligations were characterized as principal and interest expense in periods prior to January 1, 2019. Beginning on January 1, 2019, these payments are characterized as rent expense and thus reduce gross profit and operating income (primarily from the Wholesale segment), income before income taxes and net income relative to the results reported for periods prior to January 1, 2019.

See Notes 7, 8 and 15 for additional information.

Concentration Risk

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, we distributed 8% of our total wholesale distribution volumes to DMS and DMS accounted for 9% of our rental income. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we distributed 12% of our total wholesale distribution volumes to DMS and DMS accounted for 20% of our rental income. See Note 9 for information on an amendment to the master lease and master fuel supply agreements with DMS.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, we distributed 7% of our total wholesale distribution volume to Circle K retail sites that are not supplied by CST Fuel Supply and received 19% of our rental income from Circle K. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we distributed 7% of our total wholesale distribution volume to CST retail sites that are not supplied by CST Fuel Supply and received 19% of our rental income from Circle K.

For more information regarding transactions with DMS and Circle K, see Note 9.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, our wholesale business purchased approximately 26%, 25%, 13% and 10% of its motor fuel from ExxonMobil, BP, Motiva and Circle K, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, our wholesale business purchased approximately 26%, 26%, 12% and 11% of its motor fuel from ExxonMobil, BP, Motiva and Circle K, respectively. No other fuel suppliers accounted for 10% or more of our motor fuel purchases during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

Valero supplied substantially all of the motor fuel purchased by CST Fuel Supply during all periods presented. During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, CST Fuel Supply purchased approximately 0.4 billion gallons of motor fuel from Valero.