fp0010958_10k.htm

Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Subscription Agreement, Consulting Agreements, and Promissory Note are incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.

	TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Part I	Page No.

Item 1.	Business

Item 1.A	Risk Factors

Item 2.	Properties

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures (Not Applicable)

	Part II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9 A.	Controls and Procedures

	Part III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11.	Executive Compensation

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

	Part IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

	Signatures

EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are projections of events, revenues, income, future economic performance or management’s plans and objectives for our future operations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the risks set out below, any of which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation:

- the uncertainty of profitability based upon our history of losses;

- risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms to continue as going concern;

- risks related to our international operations and currency exchange fluctuations; and

- ther risks and uncertainties related to our business plan and business strategy.

This list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. All references to “common stock” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company”, “Earth Science Tech” and “UNOV” mean Earth Science Tech Inc. and its subsidiary, unless otherwise indicated.

Item 1. BUSINESS

Our Business

Earth Science Tech is a management-consulting firm for fitness facility operators. We focus on assisting independent operators of fitness centers, as well as start-ups. We consult on a variety of areas, including business model and management analysis, staffing issues, customer acquisition and retention, operational efficiency and marketing strategy, among others. Our objective for each project is to develop readily executable plans for our clients. We’ve done work both in North America and Russia, where the fitness industry is highly fragmented and extremely competitive.

Business Model and Management Analysis

Earth Science Tech conducts an independent and unbiased review of the overall operations of our client’s fitness facility. This analysis can be done with a visit to the facility by one of our consultants or through a series of phone interviews, emails and business plan analysis. We look at every aspect of the business from the services offered to marketing and overall operations of the fitness facility. At the completion of our analysis, our consultants provide a report to the client that outlines areas that need improvement and a list of recommendations to improve the management of the facility. This analysis can be very useful to clients who run the business day to day and may miss areas that need improvement in order to increase revenue. The end goal of the analysis is an executable plan of action for the owners of the gym.

As well as a standalone one-off service, we offer this analysis prior to commencement of longer-term projects for new clients. This is an easy way for us to get acquainted with our clients’ operations and issues.

Marketing Services

Marketing a fitness facility correctly and effectively is one of the most important ways to increase revenue and attract new clients. Customer acquisition, however, can be prohibitively expensive for our clients. Our fitness marketing specialists work with our clients to develop and implement a successful marketing plan that is within our customers’ budget.

We also provide a number of marketing services to suit our customers’ marketing budget. Our services include direct marketing, search engine optimization, public relations, email marketing, social media marketing and development of referral programs.

Franchising Development

Our franchising consultants help our clients set up their franchising plans in an economical and efficient way. We consult on development, registration, marketing and operation of a franchise system. A franchise business has to be properly organized and well marketed to achieve success. Our consultants can help develop a franchising plan, conduct feasibility studies, create a strategic growth plan and a marketing plan to help our clients’ business franchise successfully.

Another important aspect that can get overlooked when franchising a business is the development of franchise operations and training manuals. Proper manuals are essential in a franchising business in order for the franchisees to be successful. When properly written, these manuals can serve as one of the strongest selling tools for a franchising system. We help our clients develop daily procedures manuals, sales and marketing manuals, personnel manuals, training manuals and accounting and bookkeeping manuals.

Consulting Packages

We currently offer three consulting packages to both new and existing clients.

Start-Up Gym Package. This consulting package is for clients who are starting up their fitness facility business and want to manage it properly from the start. Our consultants work with the client to develop an “opening day” strategy in order to attract the first members and create an opening day event that will attract the attention of the local community. Our consultants work to establish operating systems for the gym to decrease overhead and maximize efficiency. This package is designed for our clients to have a greater chance of success in the highly competitive fitness industry.

Marketing Package. If the client already has a marketing budget and plan in place, our marketing package can help execute it in a cost effective way. This package includes 3 months of public relations services, a direct marketing campaign to 5000 households as well as search engine optimization and email marketing services.

Franchising Manual Package. We offer this package to clients who own a franchise or are in the process of franchising their business and looking for help with creating or updating the franchise manuals. Our franchising consultants will create a daily procedures manual, marketing manual and personnel manual for a onetime cost. This package includes 3 manuals of up to 100 pages each as well as two sets of revisions and edits. Costs are determined after an initial meeting with the client.

Seminars

As well as providing one-on-one consulting services, we also conduct seminars on a variety of topics to fitness center staff. We create a custom seminar for each client and conduct a half-day or a full day seminar for employees, sales staff and management.

Competition

The competition in the fitness center consulting industry is very intense. With a number of large corporations and small independent consultants available to fitness facilities for hire, we face intense competition for clients. There are a number of large international companies that have worked with Russian fitness facilities to provide them with consultation on everything from design to marketing and sales.

One such company is Optimal Design Systems International. They have worked with Gold’s Gym among others to design fitness facilities in Russia and provide consulting services.

There are local companies in larger cities in Russia that also provide fitness facility consulting. Among others, one such company is Fitness Service. They provide consulting services that include business plan preparation, marketing strategy development, sales consulting and gym design.

In addition to large companies, Russia has a number of independent consultants who offer similar services to ours. Among individuals who have worked in fitness facilities previously and now provide consulting services, a number of Olympic medalists have become fitness facility consultants upon their retirement from professional sports. Due to lower fees than larger corporations, independent consultants are more popular among smaller gyms and chains.

Patent, Trademark, License and Franchise Restrictions and Contractual Obligations and Concessions

We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patents or trademarks.

Research and Development Activities

Other than time spent researching our proposed business we have not spent any funds on research and development activities to date. We do not currently plan to spend any funds on research and development activities in the future.

Compliance with Environmental Laws

We are not aware of any environmental laws that have been enacted, nor are we aware of any such laws being contemplated for the future, that impact issues specific to our business.

Employees

We have one full-time employee at the present time, consisting of Harvey Katz, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Our officers and directors are responsible for planning, developing and operational duties, and will continue to do so throughout the early stages of our growth.

Reports to Securities Holders

We provide an annual report that includes audited financial information to our shareholders. We will make our financial information equally available to any interested parties or investors through compliance with the disclosure rules for a small business issuer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We are subject to disclosure filing requirements including filing Form 10K annually and Form 10Q quarterly. In addition, we will file Form 8K and other proxy and information statements from time to time as required. We do not intend to voluntarily file the above reports in the event that our obligation to file such reports is suspended under the Exchange Act. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, ("SEC"), at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion meaning there is substantial uncertainty whether we will continue operations.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion in their report dated July 10, 2014. This means that, as of the time of the opinion, there was substantial doubt that we could continue as an ongoing business for the next twelve months. We have generated $7,450.00 in revenue for the year ended March 31, 2014. Further, we posted a net loss of $39,823.00 for the year ended March 31, 2014. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management’s plans for our continued existence include selling additional stock and borrowing additional funds to pay overhead expenses. Our future success is dependent upon our ability to achieve profitable operations, generate cash from operating activities and obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations, sell additional shares of common stock or borrow additional funds. Our inability to obtain additional cash could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and its ability to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

We face intense competition in our industry. If we are unable to compete successfully, our business will be seriously harmed.

The fitness consulting market is highly competitive and has relatively low barriers to entry. Our competitors vary in size and in the variety of services they offer. Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and an established client base. These competitors may be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sales of their services than we can. If we fail to compete successfully against our competitors our business could be harmed.

Our business relies on our ability to attract new customers. If we are unable to attract new customers, our business will fail.

Our future growth is dependent on our ability to attract new customers and our ability to sell additional services to our existing customers. We rely on online marketing and referrals from existing customers and other business associates to attract new customers. We also rely on selling additional services to our new or existing clients for additional revenue. If we are unable to attract new customers or sell additional services to our existing customers, our revenue will likely decline and our business will fail.

We could be subject to product liability, personal injury or other litigation claims which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operations.

As part of our plan of operations over the next twelve months, we plan on expanding our service offerings to become a dealer of specialized commercial fitness equipment. The products we plan on selling may expose the company to a risk of product liability claims. Purchasers of our products, or their employees or customers, could be injured or suffer property damage from exposure to, or defects in, products we intend to supply, and we could be subject to claims, including product liability or personal injury claims. With respect to product liability claims, the Company will seek contractual indemnification and insurance coverage from parties supplying its products, but this indemnification or insurance coverage is limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party and the policy limits of any insurance provided by suppliers.

If we will not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification available, product liability relating to defective products could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We will not be required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until the end of the second fiscal year reported upon in our second annual report on form 10-k.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the new rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commissions, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have imposed various new requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices.

We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These costs could affect profitability and our results of operations.

We are in the process of determining whether our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems are compliant with Section 404. We will not be required to conduct the evaluation of effectiveness of our internal controls until the end of the fiscal year reported upon in our second annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, because we are a smaller reporting company, we are not required to obtain the auditor attestation of management’s evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting. If we obtain and disclose such reports we could continue doing so at our discretion so long as we remain a smaller reporting company.

This process of internal control evaluation and attestation may divert internal resources and will take a significant amount of time, effort and expense to complete. If it is determined that we are not in compliance with Section 404, we may be required to implement new internal control procedures and re-evaluate our financial reporting. If we are unable to implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it could harm our operations, financial reporting or financial results, which could adversely affect our ability to comply with our periodic reporting obligations under the Exchange Act.

We lack an operating history. There is no assurance our future operations will result in profitable revenues. If we cannot generate sufficient revenues to operate profitably, our business will fail.

We were incorporated on April 23, 2010, have realized $72,769.00 in revenues and incurred $205,512.00 in operating costs since inception. As of March 31, 2014, we had $145,391.00 deficit accumulated during the development stage. We have a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. Based upon current plans, we expect to continue generating revenues. However, our revenues may not be sufficient to cover our operating costs. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in generating significant revenues in the future. Failure to achieve a sustainable sales level will cause us to go out of business.

We depend on key personnel.

Our future success will depend in part on the continued service of key personnel, particularly, Harvey Katz, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director. If any of our directors and officers choose to leave the company, we will face significant difficulties in attracting potential candidates for replacement of our key personnel due to our limited financial resources and operating history. In addition, the loss of any key employees or the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel could delay our plan of operations and harm our ability to provide services to our current customers and harm the market’s perception of us.

Our officers, directors, consultants and advisors are not obligated to commit their time and attention exclusively to our business and therefore they may encounter conflicts of interest with respect to the allocation of time and business opportunities between our operations and those of other businesses.

Our directors are not obligated to commit their time and attention exclusively to our business and, accordingly, they may encounter conflicts of interest in allocating their own time, or any business opportunities which they may encounter, between our operations and those of other businesses.

Currently, Harvey Katz commits the majority of his time to our business in his capacity as an officer and director. Nevertheless, if the execution of our business plan demands more time than is currently committed by any of our officers, directors, consultants or advisors, they will be under no obligation to commit such additional time, and their failure to do so may adversely affect our ability to carry on our business and successfully execute our business plan.

Additionally, all of our officers and directors, in the course of their other business activities, may become aware of investments, business opportunities, or information which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as to other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. They may also in the future become affiliated with entities that are engaged in business or other activities similar to those we intend to conduct. As a result, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity particular opportunities or information should be presented. If, as a result of such conflict, we are deprived of investment, business or information, the execution of our business plan and our ability to effectively compete in the marketplace may be adversely affected.

No member of our Board of Directors is considered an audit committee financial expert. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results. As a result, current and potential shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our stock.

Our Board of Directors is relatively inexperienced with U.S. GAAP and the related internal control procedures required of U.S. public companies. Although our Chief Financial Officer is experienced in accounting requirements and procedures generally accepted in the Russian Federation, management has determined that she requires additional training and assistance in U.S. GAAP matters. Management has determined that our internal audit function is also significantly deficient due to insufficient qualified resources to perform internal audit functions. Finally, we have not established an Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

We are a development stage company with limited resources. Therefore, we cannot assure investors that we will be able to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For these reasons, we are considering the costs and benefits associated with improving and documenting our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls and procedures, which includes (i) hiring additional personnel with sufficient U.S. GAAP experience and (ii) implementing ongoing training in U.S. GAAP requirements for our CFO and accounting and other finance personnel. If the results of these efforts are not successful, or if material weaknesses are identified in our internal control over financial reporting, our management will be unable to report favorably as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and/or our disclosure controls and procedures, and we could be required to further implement expensive and time-consuming remedial measures and potentially lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports which could have an adverse effect on our stock price and potentially subject us to litigation.

We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We have never paid any cash dividends and currently do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. To the extent that we require additional funding currently not provided for in our financing plan, our funding sources may likely prohibit the payment of a dividend. Because we do not intend to declare dividends, any gain on an investment in Earth Science Tech Inc. will need to come through appreciation of the stock’s price.

There is limited public (trading) market for our common stock; therefore, our investors may not be able to sell their shares.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC QB under the symbol “ETST”. We can provide no assurance that any market for our common stock will ever develop. As a result, stockholders may be unable to liquidate their investments, or may encounter considerable delay in selling shares of our common stock.

A trading market may not develop in the future, and if one does develop, it may not be sustained. If an active trading market does develop, the market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile due to, among other things, the nature of our business and because we are a new public company with a limited operating history. Further, even if a public market develops, the volume of trading in our common stock will presumably be limited and likely be dominated by a few individual stockholders. The limited volume, if any, will make the price of our common stock subject to manipulation by one or more stockholders and will significantly limit the number of shares that one can purchase or sell in a short period of time.

The market price of our common stock may also fluctuate significantly in response to the following factors, most of which are beyond our control:

- variations in our quarterly operating results;

- changes in general economic conditions;

- loss of a major customer, partner or joint venture participant; and

- the addition or loss of key managerial and collaborative personnel.

The equity markets have, on occasion, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices for many companies' securities and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies.

Any such fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. As a result, stockholders may be unable to sell their shares, or may be forced to sell them at a loss.

You could be diluted from our future issuance of capital stock and derivative securities.

As of July 10, 2014, we had 37,287,988 shares of common stock outstanding. We are authorized to issue up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock.. To the extent of such authorization, our Board of Directors will have the ability, without seeking stockholder approval, to issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock in the future for such consideration as the Board of Directors may consider sufficient. The issuance of additional common stock or preferred stock in the future may reduce your proportionate ownership and voting power.

The application of the “Penny Stock” rules could adversely affect the market price of our common shares and increase your transaction costs to sell those shares. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 3A51-1, which establishes the definition of a “Penny Stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has market price of less than $5.00 per share or within an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, Rule 15G-9 require:

- that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and

- the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the

identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

- obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and

- make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the

person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of

transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

- sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and

- that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

You may face significant restrictions on the resale of your shares due to state “Blue Sky” laws.

Each state has its own securities laws, often called “blue sky” laws, which (1) limit sales of securities to a state’s residents unless the securities are registered in that state or qualify for an exemption from registration, and (2) govern the reporting requirements for broker-dealers doing business directly or indirectly in the state. Before a security is sold in a state, there must be a registration in place to cover the transaction, or it must be exempt from registration. The applicable broker-dealer must also be registered in that state.

We do not know whether our securities will be registered or exempt from registration under the laws of any state. A determination regarding registration will be made by those broker-dealers, if any, who agree to serve as market makers for our common stock. There may be significant state blue sky law restrictions on the ability of investors to sell, and on purchasers to buy, our securities. You should therefore consider the resale market for our common stock to be limited, as you may be unable to resell your shares without the significant expense of state registration or qualification.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

We do not hold ownership or leasehold interest in any property and pay our office rent on a monthly basis.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings, and we are not aware of any pending or potential legal actions.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES (NOT APPLICABLE)

PART II

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC QB since August 29, 2012, under the symbol “ETST”. The Company is DTC eligible effective October 4, 2012.

Because we are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, our securities may be less liquid, receive less coverage by security analysts and news media, and generate lower prices than might otherwise be obtained if they were listed on a national securities exchange.

Holders.

As of March 31, 2014, there were 58record holders of 35,980,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

Dividends.

The Company has not paid any cash dividends to date and does not anticipate or contemplate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. It is the present intention of management to utilize all available funds for the development of the Company's business.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

Recent sales of unregistered securities.

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the years ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.

During the year ended March 31, 2011, we completed an offering of 6,700,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to our Directors Larissa Zabelina (3,500,000) and Elena Mochkina (3,200,000). The total amount received from this Offering was $6,700. We completed this offering pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act.

The offer and sale of all shares of our common stock listed above were affected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act.

The investor acknowledged the following: subscriber is not a United States Person, nor is the subscriber acquiring the shares directly or indirectly for the account or benefit of a United States Person. None of the funds used by the subscriber to purchase the units have been obtained from United States Persons. For purposes of the Subscription Agreement, “United States Person” within the meaning of U.S. tax laws, means a citizen or resident of the United States, any former U.S. citizen subject to Section 877 of the Internal Revenue Code, any corporation, or partnership organized or existing under the laws of the United States of America or any state, jurisdiction, territory or possession thereof and any estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax irrespective of its source, and within the meaning of U.S. securities laws, as defined in Rule 902(o) of Regulation S, means: (i) any natural person resident in the United States; (ii) any partnership or corporation organized or incorporated under the laws of the United States; (iii) any estate of which any executor or administrator is a U.S. person; (iv) any trust of which any trustee is a U.S. person; (v) any agency or branch of a foreign entity located in the United States; (vi) any non-discretionary account or similar account (other than an estate or trust) held by a dealer or other fiduciary for the benefit or account of a U.S. person; (vii) any discretionary account or similar account (other than an estate or trust) held by a dealer or other fiduciary organized, incorporated, or (if an individual) resident in the United States; and (viii) any partnership or corporation if organized under the laws of any foreign jurisdiction, and formed by a U.S. person principally for the purpose of investing in securities not registered under the Securities Act, unless it is organized or incorporated, and owned, by accredited investors (as defined in Rule 501(a)) who are not natural persons, estates or trusts.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included herein. In connection with, and because we desire to take advantage of, the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we caution readers regarding certain forward looking statements in the following discussion and elsewhere in this report and in any other statement made by, or on our behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by, or our behalf. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements.

Results of Operations

For the year ended March 31, 2014 compared to the year ended March 31, 2013

Our results of operations, as reported in our consolidated financial statements, incorporate results of operations of our wholly owned subsidiary Earth Science Tech (Canada) Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Revenue

We generate revenue from consulting and marketing services. As of March 31, 2014 we generated $72,769.00 in revenue since inception compared to March 31, 2013 when we generated $65,319 in revenues since inception. Our gross revenue for the year ended March 31, 2014 was $7,450.00 compared to March 31, 2013 which was $41,888. Our cost of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2014 was $900.00 compared to March 31, 2013 when it was $6,762 resulting in a gross profit of $6,550.00 (March 31, 2013: $35,126.00). The decrease in revenues during our fiscal 2014 was attributable to the increase in sales of consulting and marketing services to new clients.

Operating Costs and Expenses

The major components of our expenses for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are outlined in the table below:

	Year Ended March 31, 2013		Year Ended March 31, 2013		Increase (Decrease) %

Advertising	$	-	$	5,200
Professional fees		36,711		24,883
Consulting		-		12,500
Officer compensation		2,700		3,600
Salaries		-		36,758
Other		6,856		11,521
Travel expense		-		2,168
Website development cost		-		-
	$	46,267	$	96,630

Total operating costs for the year ended March 31, 2014 were half the level of total operating costs for the year ended March 31, 2013. However, during the year ended March 31, 2013 we experienced an increase in advertising costs of $5,200, in professional fees of $19,083, in salaries of $36,758 and in other general and administrative costs of $4,386. During the year ended March 31, 2014 we spent most of our time and resources on maintaining our reporting requirements pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and promotion of our services to potential customers. As a result, we incurred $19,197 in website development costs, an amount that represents 46.15% of our total operating costs for the year ended March 31, 2012.

The increase in our operating costs during the year ended March 31, 2013 was due to an increase in our corporate activities, payroll expenses, an increase in expenses related to implementation of our business plan and an increase in professional fees associated with our reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act. A portion of professional and consulting fees were incurred by the company in relation to the listing of the company’s stock on the OTC Bulletin Board and obtaining its DTC eligibility. During the year ended March 31, 2014 we incurred $0 in salaries (March 31, 2013: $36,758) and spent $0 (March 31, 2013: $5,200) on advertising of our consulting and marketing services.

The President of the Company provides management consulting services to the Company. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company incurred $3,600 in management consulting expenses (March 31, 2012: $3,600). The Chief Financial Officer of the Company provides consulting services to the Company. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company incurred $3,600 in consulting services (March 31, 2012: $3,600). A portion of consulting services directly related to sales provided by the President and Chief Financial Officer totaling $3,600 was reported as cost of sales as of March 31, 2013 and 2012. During the year ended March 31, 2014 the Company incurred $0 in management consulting expenses.

Other expenses represent bank charges, office expenses, rent and purchase of fitness products.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital	Year Ended March 31, 2014		Year Ended March 31, 2013
Current Assets	$	554,954	$	4,756
Current Liabilities	$	205,861	$	67,824
Working Capital	$	349,093	$	(63,068	)

Cash Flows

The table below, for the periods indicated, provides selected cash flow information:

	Year Ended March 31, 2014			Year Ended March 31, 2013
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(43,721	)	$	(51,023	)
Cash used in investing activities	$	-		$	-
Cash provided by financing activities	$	415,415,669		$	44,125
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	371,948		$	(6,898	)

During the year ended March 31, 2014 we generated $7,450.00 in revenues compared to the year ended March 31, 2013 when we generated $41,888 in revenues. In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company’s Registration Statement on the Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission was declared effective. The Company had sold 3,580,000 common shares at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $35,800 pursuant to this Registration Statement.

During the year ended March 31, 2012, the President of the Company provided a $25,000 loan to the Company. The loan is payable on demand, unsecured, bears interest at 4.5% per annum (compounded yearly) and consists of $25,000 of principal, and $2,081 of accrued interest payable as of March 31, 2013.

We anticipate that for the next 12 months we will be generating cash from the same revenue stream, consulting services. We intend to increase our revenues by offering other services to our existing clients, including marketing, sale of fitness equipment and accessories. These services will provide additional cash inflow for our working capital. There is no guarantee that our clients will sign up for one or more of these services. In this case we will continue providing our consulting services while working on expansion of our client base.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our cash used in operating activities of $(43,721) for the year ended March 31, 2014 was primarily the result of our net income plus net result in changes of our assets and liabilities. Cash flows resulting from changes in assets and liabilities include a decrease in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and a decrease in prepaid expenses. The decrease in prepaid expenses was due to a reduction in prepaid audit fees for the Year Ended March 31, 2014.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

We did not generate or use any cash from investing activities during the year ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

During the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company had sold 753,000 common shares at $0.50 per share for total proceeds of $376,500.00. In addition, during the year ended March 31, 2014, we incurred $0 (March 31, 2013: $0) for management consulting services.

Future Financings

We anticipate that additional funding will be required in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. However, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or through a loan from our directors to meet our obligations over the next twelve months. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

EARTH SCIENCE TECH INC.

(F.K.A. ULTIMATE NOVELTY SPORTS, INC.)

MARCH 31, 2014

Index to Financial Statements

Contents	Page (s)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2014 and 2013	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and cumulative since inception	F-3

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Period from April 23, 2010 (Inception) through March 31, 2014	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and cumulative since inception	F-5

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Earth Science Tech, Inc. (A Development Stage Company)

(F.K.A Ultimate Novelty Sports, Inc.)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Earth Science Tech, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) (the “Company”) (F.K.A Ultimate Novelty Sports, Inc.) as of March 31, 2014 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended and from inception (April 19, 2007) to March 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Earth Science Tech, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) (F.K.A Ultimate Novelty Sports, Inc.) as of March 31, 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ De Joya Griffith, LLC

Henderson, Nevada

July 10, 2014

Corporate Headquarters:

De Joya Griffith, LLC

2580 Anthem Village Drive, Henderson, NV 89052 Phone: (702) 563-1600 Fax: (702) 920-8049

F-1

EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.

(F.K.A. ULTIMATE NOVELTY SPORTS, INC.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

	March 31,			March 31,
	2014			2013
Current Assets:
Cash	$	376,704		$	4,756
Deposits		178,250			-
Total current assets		554,954			4,756
Total Assets	$	554,954		$	4,756

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'S (EQUITY/DEFICIT)

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	745		$	24,543
Due to related parties		166,511			16,200
Loan payable - related parties		38,605			27,081
Total current liabilities		205,861			67,824
Total liabilities		205,861			67,824
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' (Deficit):
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 75,000,000
shares authorized; 35,980,000 and 10,280,000 shares
issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 respectively		35,980			10,280
Additional paid-in capital		12,932,004			32,220
Stock payable		376,500			-
Services receivable		(12,850,000	)		-
(Deficit) accumulated during the development stage		(145,391	)		(105,568	)
Total stockholders' (equity/deficit)		349,093			(63,068	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's (Equity/Deficit)	$	554,954		$	4,756

F-2

EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.

(F.K.A. ULTIMATE NOVELTY SPORTS, INC.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							Cumulative
	Year			Year			From Inception
	Ended			Ended			(April 23, 2010)
	March 31,			March 31,			Through March 31,
	2014			2013			2014
Revenue	$	7,450		$	41,888		$	72,769
Cost of Revenues		900			6,762			11,940
Gross Profit		6,550			35,126			60,829


Expenses:
General and administrative:
Advertising		-			5,200			5,200
Compensation - officers		2,700			3,600			11,700
Consulting		-			12,500			14,500
Legal - Organization costs		-			-			995
Other - general and administrative		6,856			11,521			26,553
Professional fees		36,711			24,883			69,894
Salaries		-			36,758			36,758
Travel expense		-			2,168			20,715
Website development cost		-			-			19,197
Total operating expenses		46,267			96,630			205,512
(Loss) from Operations		(39,717	)		(61,504	)		(144,683	)

Other (Income) Expenses
Foreign currency transaction loss		106			525			708
Total Other (Income) Expenses, net		106			525			708
Provision for Income Taxes		-			-			-

Net (Loss)	$	(39,823	)	$	(62,029	)	$	(145,391	)

(Loss) Per Common Share:
(Loss) per common share - Basic and Diluted	$	-		$	(0.01	)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic and Diluted	$	10,758,137			9,492,685

F-3

EARTH SCIENC E TECH, INC.

(F.K.A. ULTIMATE NOVELTY SPORTS, INC.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STATE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Year Ended March 31, 2014			Year Ended March 31, 2013			Cumulative From Inception (April 23, 2010) Through March 31, 2014
Operating Activities:
Net (loss)	$	(39,823	)	$	(62,029	)	$	(145,391	)
Items not involving cash:
Forgiveness of debt
Changes in non-cash working capital:
Change in deposits		(178,250	)					(178,250	)
Change in prepaid expenses					1,500
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(23,798	)		9,506			24,543
Change in advances from officers		198,150						166,511
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities		(43,721	)		(51,023	)		(124,182	)

Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		376,500			35,800			419,000
Proceeds from related parties					7,200			16,200
Proceeds from loan payable-related parties		39,169			1,125			65,686
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		415,669			44,125			500,886
Net Increase (Decrease in Cash)		371,948			(6,898	)		376,704

Cash - Beginning of Period		4,756			11,654			0
Cash - End of Period	$	376,704		$	4,756		$	376,704

F-4

EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.

(F.K.A. ULTIMATE NOVELTY SPORTS, INC.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (APRIL 23, 2010)

THROUGH MARCH 31, 2014

					Additional							(Deficit) Accumulated During the
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Stock		Services			Development
Description	Shares		Amount		Capital		Payable		Receivable			Stage			Total

Balance - April 23, 2010		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-
Common stock issued for cash at $0.001 per share		6,700,000		6,700		-		-		-			-			6,700
Net (loss) for the period		-		-		-		-		-			(20,687	)		(20,687	)
Balance - March 31, 2011		6,700,000		6,700		-		-		-			(20,687	)		(13,987	)

Net (loss) for the year		-		-		-		-		-			(22,852	)		(22,852	)
Balance - March 31, 2012		6,700,000		6,700		-		-		-			(43,539	)		(36,839	)

Common stock issued for cash at $0.01 per share		3,580,000		3,580		32,220		-		-			-			35,800
Net (loss) for the year		-		-		-		-		-			(62,029	)		(62,029	)
Balance - March 31, 2013		10,280,000		10,280		32,220		-		-			(105,568	)		(63,068	)

Forgiveness of amounts due to related party		-		-		75,484		-								75,484
Cash received for subscription of shares		-		-		-		376,500		-						376,500
Shares issued for services to be received		700,000		700		349,300		-		(350,000	)
Founder shares issued for services to be received		25,000,000		25,000		12,475,000		-		(12,500,000	)
Net (loss) for the year		-		-		-		-		-			(39,823	)		(39,823	)
Balance - March 31, 2014		35,980,000	$	35,980	$	12,932,004	$	376,500	$	(12,850,000	)	$	(145,391	)	$	349,093

F-5

EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.

(F.K.A. ULTIMATE NOVELTY SPORTS, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

March 31, 2014

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – organization and operations

Earth Science Tech, Inc.

Earth Science Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 23, 2010. The Company provides consulting services to the athletic facilities industry. The Company offers a full range of consulting services, including start-up strategy development, membership pricing and management, operational analysis, marketing and public relations and staff training. EST is a unique biotechnology company focused on cutting edge nutraceuticals and bioceuticals designed to excel in industries such as health, wellness, nutrition, supplement, cosmetic and alternative medicine to improve the quality of life for consumers worldwide. EST is dedicated in providing natural alternatives to prescription medications that help improve common disorders and illnesses. EST is focused on delivering nutritional and dietary supplements that help with treating symptoms such as: chronic pain, joint pain, inflammation, seizures, high blood pressure, memory loss, depression, weight management, nausea, aging and overall wellness. This may include products such as vitamins, minerals, herbs, botanicals, personal care products, homeopathics, functional foods, and other products. These products will be in various formulations and delivery forms including capsules, tablets, soft gels, chewables, liquids, creams, sprays, powders, and whole herbs.

On March 06, 2014, the Board of Directors of Ultimate Novelty Sports, Inc. (the”Company”) approved the name change from Ultimate Novelty Sports, Inc. to Earth Science Tech, Inc. The change in the name of the Company was approved by a majority vote of the Shareholders of the Company.

On May 28, 2014 the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) approved the name change of the Company to Earth Science Tech, Inc. as well as the new symbol change from UNOV to ETST.

Formation of Ultimate Novelty Sports (Canada) Inc.

On May 6, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Ultimate Novelty Sports Inc., an Ontario, Canada Corporation (“UNSI Canada”). UNSI Canada uses the U.S. Dollar as its reporting currency as well as its functional currency, however from time to time, UNSI Canada, incurs certain expenses in Canadian Dollars.

F-6

Change in control

On October 29, 2013, pursuant to the terms of the Affiliate Stock Purchase Agreements (“Stock Purchase Agreements”) between Mrs. Larissa Zabelina, Mrs. Elena Mochkina and Doctor Issa El-Cheikh, Dr. Issa El-Cheikh purchased a combined total of 6,700,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from Mrs. Larissa Zabelina and Mrs. Elena Mochkina, former stockholders and officers of the Company, for cash consideration of $67,000. As a result of the transaction, Dr. Issa El-Cheikh became the Company’s largest stockholder with approximately 65.18% of the total issued and outstanding shares of stock.

Effective October 29, 2013, Mrs. Larissa Zabelina resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Mrs. Elena Mochkina resigned as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Dr. Issa El-Cheikh was appointed as CEO, CFO, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of the Company.

As a result of the foregoing, there was a change in control of the Company on October 29, 2013.

On March 31,2014 the Company issued 25 million shares to Majorca Group, LTD. See Note 5 below for details.

As a result of the foregoing, there was a change in control of the Company on March 31, 2014.

Disposition of Assets

On October 30, 2013, the Company sold to Optimal, Inc., a Nevada corporation 100% of the capital stock of Ultimate Novelty Sports Inc., a corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the province of Ontario, Canada for $1.00.

Note 2 – summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The Company’s accounting policies used in the presentation of the accompanying financial statements conform to accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and have been consistently applied.

Principles of consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 and cumulative from inception. UNSI Canada is included as of September 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 and for the period from May 6, 2010 (date of formation) through September 30, 2013.

F-7

All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Development stage company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Although, the Company has generated revenues it has incurred operating expenses and expenses associated with implementation of its business plan resulting in net operating losses for the reported periods and accumulated deficit since inception. The Company is devoting substantially all of its efforts on generating revenues from consulting services and implementation of its business plan. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Use of estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; the carrying value, recoverability and impairment, if any, of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and the estimated useful lives of computer equipment; income tax rate, income tax provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; its wholly-owned subsidiary’s functional currency and foreign currency exchange rate; and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, and if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-8

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and payroll taxes payable approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

It is not however practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders due to their related party nature.

F-9

Carrying value, recoverability and impairment of long-lived assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include office equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Fiscal year end

The Company elected March 31 as its fiscal year end date.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.

F-10

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any. Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.

At March 31, 2014 and 2013 there was no allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.

Office equipment

Office equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of office equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of office equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.

Related parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

F-11

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved ; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. aamounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of

Judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

F-12

Revenue recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with its customer with revenues being generated upon rendering of services. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice; service is considered provided when the service is delivered to the customers; and the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Foreign currency transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-20-35”) for foreign currency transactions. Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, which is the Company’s reporting currency and functional currency. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in exchange rates between the reporting currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of reporting currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected reporting currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) at the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) at each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or reporting currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

UNSI Canada uses the U.S. Dollar as its reporting currency as well as its functional currency, however from time to time, UNSI Canada, incurs certain expenses in Canadian Dollars. The change in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the Canadian Dollar, the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of reporting currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected reporting currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally is included in determining net income (loss) for the period in which the exchange rate changes.

F-13

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.

The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 740-10-25 at March 31, 2014 and 2013.

F-14

Net income (loss) per common share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Cash flows reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

The Company evaluated all recent accounting pronouncements issued and determined that the adoption of these pronouncements would not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

F-15

Note 3 – going concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage at March 31, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the fiscal period then ended.

While the Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – related party transactions (Note 7)

Consulting services from President and Chief Financial Officer

There were no consulting services provided by the President and Chief Financial Officer for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014.

Advances and loan payable from Former Stockholders

During the year ended March 31, 2014, the President of the Company provided a $38,605 loan to the Company. The loan is payable on 9/30/2014, is unsecured and bears interest at 8%.

From time to time, the President and Chief Executive Officer and stockholders of the Company provided advances to the Company for its working capital purposes. Those advances bore no interest and were due on demand. This advance was for $166,511 at 3/31/2014.

The President and stockholder of the Company advanced to the Company for the period from April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014 and the Company did not make any repayment toward these advances.

Forgiveness of Advances from Former Stockholders and Accrued Compensation – Former Officers

On September 30, 2013, the Company settled amounts due to directors and officers of the Company whereby the President and stockholders, forgave advances of $28,039, accrued compensation of $19,800 and loan payable of $27,645, respectively or $75,484 in aggregate. This amount was recorded as contributions to capital.

F-16

Note 5 – stockholders’ equity (deficit)

Shares authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is seventy-five million (75,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share.

Common stock

On September 20, 2010, the Company sold 6,700,000 shares of its common stock at par to its directors for $6,700 in cash.

Effective March 24, 2014 25,000,000 shares were issued to Majorca Group Ltd. for services to be received as described in a Founder Agreement between the Company and Majorca Group Ltd.. The term of the agreement is for one year and shall continue on a month to month basis until terminated by either party with a notice of thirty days. The Founder agrees to render services to Company in product development including idea generation, performing and designing formulations for products to be used in the health and nutrition market as well as marketing and sales of products to distributors and retailers. Effective March 17, 2014 Company issued 700,000 shares to Royal Palm Consulting Service, LLC for services to be rendered as described in a Consulting Agreement between the Company and Royal Palm Consulting Service, LLC. The agreement shall terminate on March 17, 2015. The Consultant agrees to serve as a consultant to assist the Company with bona fide consulting services in general corporate activities including not limited to the following areas. Business Development, Strategies and Planning as well as Research venues for product advertisement, Identify strategic partners and retail client development. All these shares were valued at $0.50 per share, being the cash price of immediately preciding share issuance to un-related parties..

During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company’s Registration Statement on the Form S-1/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission was declared effective. The Company has sold 3,580,000 common shares at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $35,800 pursuant to this Registration Statement.

During the year ended March 31, 2014, the Company had sold 753,000 common shares at $0.50 per share for total proceeds of $376,500. The 753,000 common shares were issued after March 31, 2014.

Note 6 – subsequent events

Addition common stock issued after March 31, 2014 was 208,000 for $142,250.

On June 6, 2014 the Company filed with the State of Nevada Articles of Amendment creating a Preferred A class of stock with 10,000,000 Preferred A shares having a par value of $0.001 per share.

On June 6, 2014 the Company filed with the State of Nevada a Certificate of Designation for the 10,000,000 Preferred A shares.

F-17

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls

We evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the 2014 fiscal year. This evaluation was conducted with the participation of our chief executive officer and our principal accounting officer.

Disclosure controls are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information that we are required to be disclosed in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported.

Limitations on the Effective of Controls

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but no absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. These limitations also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control. A design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Conclusions

Based upon their evaluation of our controls, the chief executive officer and principal accounting officer have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, the disclosure controls are effective providing reasonable assurance that material information relating to us is made known to management on a timely basis during the period when our reports are being prepared. There were no changes in our internal controls that occurred during the year covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table presents information with respect to our officers, directors and significant employees as of the date of this Report:

Name		Position
Harvey Katz		President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

Each director serves until our next annual meeting of the stockholders or unless they resign earlier. The Board of Directors elects officers and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Each of our directors serves until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each of our officers is elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she is removed from office. At the present time, members of the board of directors are not compensated for their services to the board.

Biographical Information Regarding Officers and Directors

Dr. Katz has a PhD in Environmental Science, a Masters of Business Management and Bachelors in Business Administration. As an entrepreneur, Dr. Katz has held leadership and management roles in several companies and served as Chief Executive Officer of International Foam Solutions, Inc. (a recycling chemical and equipment manufacturer) in that capacity, he developed the company’s marketing and strategic plans and oversaw the manufacturing operations. He started and developed International Foam Solutions, a recycling and manufacturing company. The company went public in 1999 and Dr. Katz was president of the company. During his tenure as president of IFS, the company never had any shareholder suits of any kind.

Dr. Katz holds several patents he developed while operating these companies. Dr. Katz is named as a co-inventor of a patented cancer drug as well. He also has over twenty eight (28) years’ experience in chemical and equipment manufacturing. These businesses were sold.

Dr. Katz has given numerous lectures at Universities and companies such as University of Florida (Gainesville), UNLV, Virginia Tech, and Reynolds Tobacco Corp. on polystyrene recycling.

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, since we have been focusing our efforts on obtaining financing for the company. We expect to adopt a code by the end of the current fiscal year.

Item 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation of Officers

The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities during 2014 and 2013 awarded to, earned by or paid to our executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
							Change in
							Pension
							Value &
						Non-Equity	Non-quali- fied
						Incentive	Deferred	All
						Plan	Compen-	Other
				Stock	Option	Compen-	sation	Compen-
Name and Principal		Salary	Bonus	Awards	Awards	sation	Earnings	sation	Totals
Position [1]	Year	($)*	($)	($)	($)	(S)	($)	($)*	($)
Larissa Zabelina	2013	0	0	0	0	0	0	3,600	3,600
President, CEO	2012	0	0	0	0	0	0	3,600	3,600

Elena Mochkina, CFO,	2013	0	0	0	0	0	0	3,600	3,600
Treasurer, Secretary	2012	0	0	0	0	0	0	3,600	3,600

* -

The company's president and chief financial officer provided consulting services to the company as per unwritten arrangements with the company at $300 per month starting January 1, 2011. These services include: overseeing daily operations; identifying new customers, corresponding with customers, vendors, business partners, professional firms and regulatory authorities; monitoring the company’s reporting and compliance activities. The arrangements had been formalized by written agreements on May 15, 2012.

Retirement, Resignation or Termination Plans

We sponsor no plan, whether written or verbal, that would provide compensation or benefits of any type to an executive upon retirement, or any plan that would provide payment for retirement, resignation, or termination as a result of a change in control of our company or as a result of a change in the responsibilities of an executive following a change in control of our company.

Directors’ Compensation

The persons who served as members of our board of directors, including executive officers, did not receive any compensation for services as directors for 2014 and 2013.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

There were no options exercised or stock vested during the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not maintain any qualified retirement plans or non-nonqualified deferred compensation plans for its employees or directors.

GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS

		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards			Estimated Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name	Grant Date	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Maximum (#)	All Other Stock Awards; Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)	All Other Option Awards; Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

There were no other stock based awards under the 2014 and 2013 Stock Incentive Plan.

Executive Officer Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides certain information concerning any common share purchase options, stock awards or equity incentive plan awards held by each of our named executive officers that were outstanding as of March 31, 2014.

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options(#)

Exercisable

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options(#)

Unexercisable

Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options (#)

Option

Exercise

Price ($)

Option

Expiration

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested (#)

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not

Vested

Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested

Harvey Katz

Chief Executive Officer, President

—

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2014 and as of the date of this Report: (i) by each of our directors, (ii) by each of the Named Executive Officers, (iii) by all of our executive officers and directors as a group, and (iv) by each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of any class of our outstanding shares. As of March 31, 2014, there were ____________________ shares of our common stock outstanding:

	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Beneficial Ownership
Title of Class	Directors and Officers:	(1)	%

Common	Harvey Katz, CEO, President and Director	0	0
Common	All executive officers and directors as a group (2 persons)	6,700,000	18%

(1)	Applicable percentage of ownership is based on __37,080,000____________ shares of common stock outstanding on March 31, 2014.

Percentage ownership is determined based on shares owned together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of March 31, 2014, for each stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Our common stock is our only issued and outstanding class of securities eligible to vote.

Item 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Consulting services provided by the President and Chief Financial Officer, accrued as compensation – officers and cost of revenues for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Year Ended March 31, 2014		Year Ended March 31, 2013

Harvey Katz, President
- Cost of revenue	$	-	$	3,600
- Officer compensation				3,600
	$	-	$	7,200

We have not entered into any transactions with our officers, directors, persons nominated for these positions, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock, or family members of these persons wherein the amount involved in the transaction or a series of similar transactions exceeded $60,000.

Our management is involved in other business activities and may, in the future become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between our business and their other business interests. In the event that a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of our directors, a director who has such a conflict will disclose her interest in a proposed transaction and will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such transaction.

Director Independence

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC bulletin board interdealer quotation system, which does not have director independence requirements. Under NASDAQ rule 4200(a)(15), a director is not considered to be independent if he or she is also an executive officer or employee of the corporation. Our director, Harvey Katz, is also our chief executive officer; our director Harvey Katz is also our chief financial officer. As a result, none of our directors is independent.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

During the years ended March 31, 2014 we engaged De Joya Griffith out of Las Vegas, Nevada to handle all of our accounting. During the year ended March 31, 2013 we engaged Ronald R. Chadwick, P.C., as our independent auditor. For the years ended March 31, 2014, and 2013, we incurred fees as discussed below:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	March 31, 2014	March 31, 2013
Audit fees	$_13,000_____	$7,750
Audit – related fees	Nil	Nil
Tax fees	500	500
All other fees	Nil	Nil

Audit fees consist of fees related to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements. Tax fees represent fees related to preparation of our corporation income tax returns.

Our policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Under our audit committee’s policy, pre-approval is generally provided for particular services or categories of services, including planned services, project based services and routine consultations. In addition, the audit committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. Our audit committee approved all services that our independent accountants provided to us in the past two fiscal years.

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT

NUMBER DESCRIPTION

3.1		Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
3.2		Bylaws. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
4.2		Subscription Agreement. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
10.1		Promissory Note, President. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on May 24, 2012.
10.2		Consulting Agreement, C.E.O. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on May 24, 2012.
10.3		Consulting Agreement, C.F.O. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on May 24, 2012.
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document **
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document **
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document **
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document **
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document **
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document **

* Filed herewith.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: July 11, 2014

		EARTH SCIENCE TECH, INC.

		By:	/s/ Harvey Katz
			Harvey Katz
			President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Earth Science Tech Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURES	TITLE	DATE

/s/ Harvey Katz	President, C.E.O. and Director	July 11, 2014
Harvey Katz
/s/ Harvey Katz	Treasurer, Secretary, C.F.O., Principal Accounting Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director	July 11, 2014
Harvey Katz

Nevada		45-4267181
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

40 East Main Street, Suite 998,
Newark, Delaware		19711
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock		Over the Counter
$0.001 par value		Bulletin Board

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [ x ]