XML 12 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Going concern

Going concern

  

As of September 30, 2019, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $83.2 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company earned revenue of approximately $1.9 million and incurred a loss from operations of approximately $6.5 million.

  

The reports of our independent registered public accounting firm on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 contained an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern based upon our net losses and accumulated deficit.

  

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon financial support from the Company’s current shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain additional equity or debt financing to continue operations, the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, successfully locating and negotiating with other business entities for potential acquisition and /or acquiring new clients to generate revenues and cash flows.

  

There is no assurance that the Company will ever be profitable or be able to secure funding or generate sufficient revenues to sustain operations. As such, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Net Loss per Common Share

Net Loss per Common Share

 

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings per Share”. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible notes and stock warrants, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options, warrants and conversion of convertible notes. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. The following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 because their effect was antidilutive:

 

Security   2019     2018  
Stock Options     106,400,006       105,950,000  
Warrants     47,453,227       46,201,477  
Total     153,853,233       152,151,477  
Inventories

Inventories

 

Inventories of kiosks held by IDGS S.A.S are stated at the lower of cost (using the first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. The kiosks provide electronic ticketing for transit systems. Inventory of plastic/ID cards, digital printing material, which are held by Cards Plus Pty Ltd., are stated at the lower of cost (using the average method) or net realizable value. The Plastic/ID cards and digital printing material are used to provide plastic loyal ID and other types of cards. Inventories at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 consist of kiosks that were not placed into service and are held for sale and cards inventory. Any adjustments to reduce the cost of inventories to their net realizable value are recognized in earnings in the current period. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had an inventory valuation allowance of approximately $354,000 and $707,000, respectively, to reflect net realizable value of the kiosks that are being held for sale, and the Company believes no valuation allowance was necessary regarding the cards inventory.

Leases

Leases

  

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (Topic 842). Topic 842 amends several aspects of lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize leases with a term greater than one year as a right-of-use asset and corresponding liability, measured at the present value of the lease payments. In July 2018, the FASB issued supplemental adoption guidance and clarification to Topic 842 within ASU 2018-10 “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases” and ASU 2018-11 “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.” The new guidance aims to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. A modified retrospective application is required with an option to not restate comparative periods in the period of adoption.

 

The Company, effective January 1, 2019 has adopted the provisions of the new standard. The Company decided to use the practical expedients available upon adoption of Topic 842 to aid the transition from former accounting to provisions of Topic 842. The package of expedients will effectively allow Ipsidy to run off existing leases, as initially classified as operating or financing, and classify new leases after implementation under the new standard as the business evolves.

 

The practical expedients elected by the Company in transition permits us not to reassess our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. Furthermore, we have elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for leases with a term of 12 or less months which are not reasonably certain of exercising any available renewal options that would extend past 12 months. Additionally, we will continue to account for the executory costs of the direct financing lease as previously concluded and the initial direct costs were not considered significant.

  

The Company has operating leases principally for offices and some of the leases have renewal options. Management evaluates each lease independently to determine the purpose, necessity to its future operations in addition to other appropriate facts and circumstances.

  

We adopted Topic 842 using a modified retrospective approach for all existing leases at January 1, 2019. The adoption of Topic 842 impacted our balance sheet by the recognition of the operating lease right-of-use assets and the liability for operating leases. The accounting for finance leases (capital leases) was substantially unchanged. Accordingly, upon adoption, leases that were classified as operating leases under the previous guidance were classified as operating leases under Topic 842. The lease liability is based on the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using a market based incremental borrowing rate as the effective date of January 1, 2019 using current estimates as to lease term including estimated renewals for each operating lease. As of January 1, 2019, the Company recorded an adjustment of approximately $514,000 to operating lease right-of-use assets (“ROU”) and the related lease liability. See Note 12 for further information with respect to leases.

 

See Notes 7, 10, 11 and 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

  

Below is the Company’s revenue recognition policy determined by revenue stream for its significant revenue generating during the periods ended September 30, 2019.

  

Cards Plus - The Company recognizes revenue for the design and production of cards when products are shipped or services have been performed due to the short term nature of the contracts.

  

Payment Processing – The Company recognizes revenue for variable fees generated for payment processing solutions that are earned on a usage fee over time based on monthly transaction volumes or on a monthly flat fee rate. Additionally, the Company also sells certain equipment from time to time for which revenue is recognized upon delivery to the customer.

  

Identity Solutions – The Company recognizes revenue based on the identified performance obligations over the performance period for fixed consideration and for variable fees generated that are earned on a usage fee based over time based on monthly transaction volumes or on a monthly flat fee rate. The Company had a deferred revenue contract liability of approximately $283,000 and $236,000 as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, for certain revenue that will be earned in future periods. The majority of the $236,000 of deferred revenue contract liability as of December 31, 2018 was earned in the first three months of 2019. The Company anticipates that approximately $144,000 of the deferred revenue contract liability as of September 30, 2019 will be earned in the quarter ended December 31, 2019 and the balance in the first three months of 2020.

  

In 2018, the Company introduced a pay for performance plan for internal and external sales force, which is based on a percentage of revenues received by the Company. In the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, no commissions were earned. We will defer and amortize any direct and incremental commission as well as costs to obtain a contract over the term of the related contracts. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no deferred commissions.

  

We will review each new contract for the related performance obligations and related revenue and expense recognition implications. We expect that the revenues derived from the new identity services could include multiple performance obligations. A performance obligation under the new revenue standard is defined as a promise to provide a “distinct” good or service to a customer. The Company has determined that one possible treatment under the new standard is that these services will represent a stand-ready series of distinct daily services that are substantially the same, with the same pattern of transfer to the customer. Further, the Company has determined that the performance obligation to provide account access and facilitate transactions may meet the criteria for the “as invoiced” practical expedient, in that the Company has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance completed to date. As a result, the Company anticipates it may recognize revenue in the amount to which the Company has a right to invoice, based on completed performance at the relevant date. Additionally, the contracts could include implementation services, or support on an “as needed” basis and we will review each contract and determine whether such performance obligations are separate and distinct and apply the new standard accordingly to the revenue and expense derived from or related to each such service. A more complete analysis of the impact of the standard on these contracts will be performed at the period of time when services are expected to commence, and the conclusions reached by management may be different from those described above. For the quarter ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, no revenues were recognized or required to be recognized under this practical expedient. 

  

Additionally, the Company will capitalize the incremental costs of acquiring and fulfilling a contract with a customer if the Company expects to recover those costs. The incremental costs of acquiring and fulfilling a contract are those that the Company incurs to acquire and fulfill a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if the contract had not been acquired (for example, a sales commission or specific incremental costs associated with the contract).

  

The Company capitalizes the costs incurred to acquire and fulfill a contract only if those costs meet all the following criteria:

  

a. The costs relate directly to a contract or to an anticipated contract that the Company can specifically identify.

  

b. The costs generate or enhance resources of the Company that will be used in satisfying (or in continuing to satisfy) performance obligations in the future.

  

c. The costs are expected to be recovered.

  

The Company will capitalize contract acquisition and fulfillment costs related to signing or renewing contracts that meet the above criteria, which will be classified as contract cost assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

  

Contract cost assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the expected period of benefit beginning at the time revenue begins to be realized. The amortization of contract fulfillment cost assets associated with facilitating transactions are recorded as cost of services in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amortization of contract acquisition cost assets associated with sales commissions that qualify for capitalization are recorded as selling, general and administrative expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

  

As of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had deferred contract costs, represented by contract cost assets of approximately $4,000 and $11,000, respectively, which are included in other currents assets for certain costs incurred for the future delivery of election support services. The performance obligation will be met over the next eighteen months and the costs will be expensed as the associated revenue is recognized as the Company performs its obligations.

  

As of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $10,000 and $15,000 of accounts payable and accrued expenses related to the delivery of biometric identity system and services. The $10,000 will be paid in accordance with the terms of the service provider agreements.

Share Based Payments

Share Based Payments

  

On June 20, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07 which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services. Under the ASU, most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees would be aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. Previously, share-based payment arrangements to nonemployees were accounted for under ASC 718, while nonemployee share-based payments issued for goods and services were accounted for under ASC 505-50. Before the amendment, the major difference for the Company (but not limited to) was the determination of measurement date which generally is the date on which the measurement of equity classified share-based payments becomes fixed. Equity classified share-based payments for employees was fixed at the time of grant. Equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards are no longer measured at the earlier of the date which a commitment for performance by the counterparty is reached or the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. They are now measured at the grant date of the award which is the same as share-based payments for employees. The Company adopted the requirements of the new rule as of January 1, 2019, the effective date of the new guidance.

  

The Company has determined on the date of adoption that the impact of the new standard was not significant.

  

Beginning in 2019, the Company in accordance with the requirements of the new standard will expense the fair value of the existing non-employee share-based payments over their vesting period using the fair value determined on the date of adoption. See note 9 of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements where employee and non-employee share-based payments are presented.

Reclassification

Reclassification

 

The Company reclassified research and development costs of approximately $190,000 and $496,000, respectively, in the three and nine months September 30, 2018 to conform with the current presentation in the financial statements.