FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 424(b)(2) | ||
REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-207340-09 | ||
PROSPECTUS
$917,134,000 (Approximate)
UBS
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8
(Central Index Key Number 0001727836)
as Issuing Entity
UBS
Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.
(Central Index Key Number 0001532799)
as Depositor
UBS
AG
(Central Index Key Number 0001685185)
Ladder Capital Finance LLC
(Central Index Key Number 0001541468)
Société Générale
(Central Index Key Number 0001238163)
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.
(Central Index Key Number 0001558761)
Rialto
Mortgage Finance, LLC
(Central Index Key Number 0001592182)
CIBC
Inc.
(Central Index Key Number 0001548567)
Barclays Bank PLC
(Central Index Key Number 0000312070)
as Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C8
UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. is offering certain classes of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C8 consisting of the certificate classes identified in the table below. The certificates being offered by this prospectus (and the non-offered Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR, Class Z and Class R certificates) represent the beneficial ownership interests in the issuing entity, which will be a New York common law trust named UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8. The assets of the issuing entity will primarily consist of a pool of fixed rate commercial mortgage loans, which are generally the sole source of payments on the certificates. Credit enhancement will be provided solely by certain classes of subordinate certificates that will be subordinate to certain classes of senior certificates as described under “Description of the Certificates—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses”. Each class of certificates will be entitled to receive monthly distributions of interest and/or principal on the 4th business day following the 11th day of each month (or if the 11th day is not a business day, the next business day), commencing in March 2018. The rated final distribution date for the certificates is February 2051.
Class | Approximate Initial | Approximate
Initial Pass-Through Rate | Pass-Through Rate Description | Assumed
Final | ||||||||
Class A-1 | $ | 23,231,000 | 2.6590 | % | Fixed(5) | September 2022 | ||||||
Class A-2 | $ | 68,276,000 | 3.7130 | % | Fixed(5) | February 2023 | ||||||
Class A-SB | $ | 35,465,000 | 3.9030 | % | Fixed(5) | May 2027 | ||||||
Class A-3 | $ | 284,000,000 | 3.7200 | % | Fixed(5) | January 2028 | ||||||
Class A-4 | $ | 320,645,000 | 3.9830 | % | Fixed(5) | February 2028 | ||||||
Class X-A | $ | 731,617,000 | (6) | 0.8955 | % | Variable(7) | NAP | |||||
Class X-B | $ | 185,517,000 | (8) | 0.2653 | % | Variable(9) | NAP | |||||
Class A-S | $ | 84,920,000 | 4.2150 | % | WAC Cap(10) | February 2028 | ||||||
Class B | $ | 54,871,000 | 4.5670 | % | WAC Cap(10) | February 2028 | ||||||
Class C | $ | 45,726,000 | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 |
(Footnotes to this table begin on page 3)
You should carefully consider the risk factors beginning on page 63 of this prospectus.
Neither the certificates nor the mortgage loans are insured or guaranteed by any governmental agency, instrumentality or private issuer or any other person or entity.
The certificates will represent interests in the issuing entity only. They will not represent interests in or obligations of the sponsors, depositor, any of their affiliates or any other entity. |
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators have not approved or disapproved of the offered certificates or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. will not list the offered certificates on any securities exchange or on any automated quotation system of any securities association.
The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act (both as defined in this prospectus).
The underwriters, UBS Securities LLC, SG Americas Securities, LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., CIBC World Markets Corp., Drexel Hamilton, LLC and Academy Securities, Inc. will purchase the offered certificates from UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. and will offer them to the public at negotiated prices, plus, in certain cases, accrued interest, determined at the time of sale. UBS Securities LLC is acting as a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner with respect to 60.9% of each class of offered certificates. SG Americas Securities, LLC is acting as a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner with respect to 17.3% of each class of offered certificates. Barclays Capital Inc. is acting as a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner with respect to 8.9% of each class of offered certificates. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. is acting as a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner with respect to 12.9% of each class of offered certificates. CIBC World Markets Corp., Drexel Hamilton, LLC and Academy Securities, Inc. are acting as co-managers.
The underwriters expect to deliver the offered certificates to purchasers in book-entry form only through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company in the United States and Clearstream Banking, société anonyme and Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, in Europe, against payment in New York, New York on or about February 27, 2018. UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. expects to receive from this offering approximately 108.0% of the aggregate certificate balance of the offered certificates, plus accrued interest from and including February 1, 2018, before deducting expenses payable by the depositor.
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of each class of securities to be registered |
Amount to be registered |
Proposed maximum offering price per unit(1) |
Proposed maximum aggregate offering price(1) |
Amount of registration fee(2) | ||||
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates | $917,134,000 | 100% | $917,134,000 | $ 114,183.18 |
(1) | Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee. |
(2) | Calculated according to Rule 457(s) of the Securities Act of 1933. |
UBS Securities LLC | Société Générale | Barclays | Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. |
Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners |
CIBC World Markets | Drexel Hamilton | Academy Securities |
Co-Managers |
February 12, 2018
Summary of Certificates
Class | Approx. |
Approx. |
Approx. |
Pass- |
Assumed |
Weighted |
|
Expected |
||||||||||||||
Offered Certificates | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A-1 | $ | 23,231,000 | 30.000 | % | 2.6590 | % | Fixed(5) | September 2022 | 2.61 | 3/18 – 9/22 | ||||||||||||
Class A-2 | $ | 68,276,000 | 30.000 | % | 3.7130 | % | Fixed(5) | February 2023 | 4.89 | 9/22 – 2/23 | ||||||||||||
Class A-SB | $ | 35,465,000 | 30.000 | % | 3.9030 | % | Fixed(5) | May 2027 | 7.21 | 2/23 – 5/27 | ||||||||||||
Class A-3 | $ | 284,000,000 | 30.000 | % | 3.7200 | % | Fixed(5) | January 2028 | 9.81 | 5/27 – 1/28 | ||||||||||||
Class A-4 | $ | 320,645,000 | 30.000 | % | 3.9830 | % | Fixed(5) | February 2028 | 9.93 | 1/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class X-A | $ | 731,617,000 | (6) | NAP | 0.8955 | % | Variable(7) | NAP | NAP | NAP | ||||||||||||
Class X-B | $ | 185,517,000 | (8) | NAP | 0.2653 | % | Variable(9) | NAP | NAP | NAP | ||||||||||||
Class A-S | $ | 84,920,000 | 21.875 | % | 4.2150 | % | WAC Cap(10) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class B | $ | 54,871,000 | 16.625 | % | 4.5670 | % | WAC Cap(10) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class C | $ | 45,726,000 | 12.250 | % | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Non-Offered Certificates | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class D | $ | 20,987,000 | 10.242 | % | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class D-RR | $ | 31,272,000 | 7.250 | % | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class E-RR | $ | 20,903,000 | 5.250 | % | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class F-RR | $ | 14,371,000 | 3.875 | % | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class NR-RR | $ | 40,500,891 | 0.000 | % | 4.7053 | % | WAC(11) | February 2028 | 9.97 | 2/28 – 2/28 | ||||||||||||
Class Z(12) | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | |||||||||||||||
Class R(13) | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP | NAP |
(1) | Approximate, subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%. |
(2) | The approximate initial credit support percentages set forth for the certificates are approximate and, for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, are represented in the aggregate. |
(3) | The assumed final distribution dates set forth in this prospectus have been determined on the basis of the assumptions described in “Description of the Certificates—Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date”. |
(4) | The weighted average life and expected principal window during which distributions of principal would be received as set forth in the foregoing table with respect to each class of certificates having a certificate balance are based on the assumptions set forth under “Yield and Maturity Considerations—Weighted Average Life” and on the assumptions that there are no prepayments, modifications or losses in respect of the mortgage loans and that there are no extensions or forbearances of maturity dates or anticipated repayment dates of the mortgage loans. |
(5) | The pass-through rates for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates will, in each case, be equal to a fixed rate per annum (described in the table as “Fixed”) at the pass-through rate set forth opposite such class in the table. |
(6) | The Class X-A certificates are notional amount certificates. The notional amount of the Class X-A certificates will be equal to the aggregate certificate balance of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates outstanding from time to time. The Class X-A certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal. |
(7) | The pass-through rate for the Class X-A certificates for any distribution date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date, over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through rates on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates for the related distribution date, weighted on the basis of their respective aggregate certificate balances outstanding immediately prior to that distribution date. For purposes of the calculation of the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, the mortgage interest rates will be adjusted as necessary to a 30/360 basis. |
(8) | The Class X-B certificates are notional amount certificates. The notional amount of the Class X-B certificates will be equal to the aggregate certificate balance of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates outstanding from time to time. The Class X-B certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal. |
(9) | The pass-through rate for the Class X-B certificates for any distribution date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date, over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for the related distribution date, weighted on the basis of their respective aggregate certificate balances outstanding immediately prior to that distribution date. For purposes of the calculation of the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, the mortgage interest rates will be adjusted as necessary to a 30/360 basis. |
(10) | The pass-through rates for the Class A-S and Class B certificates for any distribution date will, in each case, be a variable rate per annum (described in the table as “WAC Cap”) equal to the lesser of (i) a fixed rate per annum equal to the pass-through rate set forth opposite such class in the table and (ii) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date. For purposes of the calculation of the weighted |
3
average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, the mortgage interest rates will be adjusted as necessary to a 30/360 basis. |
(11) | The pass-through rates for the Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates for any distribution date will, in each case, be a variable rate per annum (described in the table as “WAC”) equal to the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date. For purposes of the calculation of the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, the mortgage interest rates will be adjusted as necessary to a 30/360 basis. |
(12) | The Class Z certificates will not have a certificate balance, notional amount, credit support, pass through rate, assumed final distribution date, rated final distribution date or rating. The Class Z certificates will only be entitled to distributions of excess interest accrued on the mortgage loans with an anticipated repayment date. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—ARD Loans” in this prospectus. |
(13) | The Class R certificates will not have a certificate balance, notional amount, credit support, pass-through rate, assumed final distribution date, rated final distribution date or rating. The Class R certificates represent the residual interest in each Trust REMIC as further described in this prospectus. The Class R certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal or interest. |
The Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR, Class Z and Class R certificates are not offered by this prospectus. Any information in this prospectus concerning certificates other than the offered certificates is presented solely to enhance your understanding of the offered certificates.
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Certificates | 3 |
Important Notice Regarding the Offered Certificates | 16 |
Important Notice About Information Presented in this Prospectus | 17 |
Summary of Terms | 24 |
Risk Factors | 63 |
The Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You | 63 |
Combination or “Layering” of Multiple Risks May Significantly Increase Risk of Loss | 63 |
Risks Related to Market Conditions and Other External Factors | 63 |
The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Adversely Affected the Value of CMBS and Similar Factors May in the Future Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS | 63 |
Other Events May Affect the Value and Liquidity of Your Investment | 64 |
Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans | 64 |
Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed | 64 |
Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally | 65 |
Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases | 67 |
General | 67 |
A Tenant Concentration May Result in Increased Losses | 67 |
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Multiple Tenants Also Have Risks | 68 |
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks | 68 |
Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease | 69 |
Leases That Are Not Subordinated to the Lien of the Mortgage or Do Not Contain Attornment Provisions May Have an Adverse Impact at Foreclosure | 69 |
Early Lease Termination Options May Reduce Cash Flow | 70 |
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Not-for-Profit Tenants Also Have Risks | 71 |
Office Properties Have Special Risks | 71 |
Retail Properties Have Special Risks | 72 |
Changes in the Retail Sector, Such as Online Shopping and Other Uses of Technology, Could Affect the Business Models and Viability of Retailers | 73 |
The Performance of the Retail Properties is Subject to Conditions Affecting the Retail Sector | 73 |
Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants | 74 |
Industrial Properties Have Special Risks | 75 |
Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks | 76 |
Mixed Use Properties Have Special Risks | 78 |
Hotel Properties Have Special Risks | 78 |
Risks Relating to Affiliation with a Franchise or Hotel Management Company | 80 |
Self Storage Properties Have Special Risks | 81 |
Manufactured Housing Community Properties Have Special Risks | 82 |
Parking Properties Have Special Risks | 83 |
Leased Fee Properties Have Special Risks | 84 |
Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements | 85 |
Operation of a Mortgaged Property Depends on the Property Manager’s Performance | 86 |
5
Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses | 87 |
Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses | 89 |
Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties | 90 |
Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses | 91 |
Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions | 93 |
Risks Relating to Inspections of Properties | 95 |
Risks Relating to Costs of Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations | 95 |
Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate | 95 |
Inadequacy of Title Insurers May Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates | 96 |
Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties | 97 |
Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance | 98 |
Condemnation of a Mortgaged Property May Adversely Affect Distributions on Certificates | 99 |
Limited Information Causes Uncertainty | 99 |
Historical Information | 99 |
Ongoing Information | 99 |
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Flawed Assumptions | 100 |
Frequent and Early Occurrence of Borrower Delinquencies and Defaults May Adversely Affect Your Investment | 100 |
The Mortgage Loans Have Not Been Reviewed or Re-Underwritten by Us; Some Mortgage Loans May Not Have Complied With Another Originator’s Underwriting Criteria | 101 |
Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of this Pool | 102 |
Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property | 103 |
The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property | 104 |
The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks | 105 |
A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans | 107 |
Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions | 108 |
Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk | 109 |
Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery | 111 |
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Cross-Collateralization | 111 |
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions | 112 |
Risks Associated with One Action Rules | 112 |
State Law Limitations on Assignments of Leases and Rents May Entail Risks | 112 |
Various Other Laws Could Affect the Exercise of Lender’s Rights | 113 |
The Absence of Lockboxes Entails Risks That Could Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates | 113 |
Risks of Anticipated Repayment Date Loans | 113 |
Borrower May Be Unable To Repay Remaining Principal Balance on Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date; Longer Amortization Schedules and Interest-Only Provisions Increase Risk | 114 |
Risks Related to Ground Leases and Other Leasehold Interests | 115 |
Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds | 117 |
6
Risks Relating to Tax Credits | 117 |
State and Local Mortgage Recording Taxes May Apply Upon a Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure and Reduce Net Proceeds | 118 |
Risks Relating to Shari’ah Compliant Loans | 118 |
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest | 119 |
Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests | 119 |
The Servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loans Will Shift to Other Servicers | 121 |
Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests | 121 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer | 123 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor | 125 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Asset Representations Reviewer | 126 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Certificateholder and the Companion Holders | 127 |
Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans | 130 |
Conflicts of Interest May Occur as a Result of the Rights of the Applicable Directing Certificateholder To Terminate the Special Servicer of the Applicable Whole Loan | 131 |
Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment | 132 |
Other Risks Relating to the Certificates | 132 |
The Certificates Are Limited Obligations | 132 |
The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline | 132 |
Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates | 133 |
EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements | 135 |
Bail-In Rules May Affect the Liabilities of Certain Sponsors, Including their Obligations to Repurchase Mortgage Loans | 136 |
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded | 136 |
Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors | 139 |
General | 139 |
The Timing of Prepayments and Repurchases May Change Your Anticipated Yield | 140 |
Your Yield May be Adversely Affected By Prepayments Resulting From Earnout Reserves | 142 |
Losses and Shortfalls May Change Your Anticipated Yield | 142 |
Risk of Early Termination | 143 |
Subordination of the Subordinated Certificates Will Affect the Timing of Distributions and the Application of Losses on the Subordinated Certificates | 143 |
Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and the Mortgage Loans Can Impact Your Investment | 143 |
You Have Limited Voting Rights | 143 |
The Rights of the Directing Certificateholder and the Operating Advisor Could Adversely Affect Your Investment | 144 |
7
You Have Limited Rights to Replace the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor or the Asset Representations Reviewer | 147 |
The Rights of Companion Holders and Mezzanine Debt May Adversely Affect Your Investment | 148 |
Risks Relating to Modifications of the Mortgage Loans | 149 |
Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan | 150 |
Risks Relating to Interest on Advances and Special Servicing Compensation | 151 |
Bankruptcy of a Servicer May Adversely Affect Collections on the Mortgage Loans and the Ability to Replace the Servicer | 152 |
The Sponsors, the Depositor and the Issuing Entity Are Subject to Bankruptcy or Insolvency Laws That May Affect the Issuing Entity’s Ownership of the Mortgage Loans | 152 |
The Requirement of the Special Servicer to Obtain FIRREA-Compliant Appraisals May Result in an Increased Cost to the Issuing Entity | 156 |
Tax Matters and Changes in Tax Law May Adversely Impact the Mortgage Loans or Your Investment | 157 |
Tax Considerations Relating to Foreclosure | 157 |
REMIC Status | 157 |
Material Federal Tax Considerations Regarding Original Issue Discount | 158 |
Description of the Mortgage Pool | 158 |
General | 158 |
Certain Calculations and Definitions | 160 |
Definitions | 161 |
Mortgage Pool Characteristics | 173 |
Overview | 173 |
Property Types | 175 |
Office Properties | 176 |
Retail Properties | 176 |
Industrial Properties | 177 |
Multifamily Properties | 177 |
Mixed Use Properties | 178 |
Hotel Properties | 178 |
Self Storage Properties | 179 |
Manufactured Housing Community Properties | 180 |
Specialty Use Concentrations | 180 |
Mortgage Loan Concentrations | 182 |
Top Fifteen Mortgage Loans | 182 |
Multi-Property Mortgage Loans and Related Borrower Mortgage Loans | 183 |
Geographic Concentrations | 184 |
Mortgaged Properties With Limited Prior Operating History | 185 |
Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership | 185 |
Shari’ah Compliant Loan | 186 |
Condominium Interests | 186 |
Fee & Leasehold Estates; Ground Leases | 187 |
Environmental Considerations | 188 |
Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion | 192 |
Assessment of Property Value and Condition | 193 |
Litigation and Other Considerations | 193 |
Loan Purpose | 197 |
Modified and Refinanced Loans | 198 |
8
Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings | 198 |
Tenant Issues | 200 |
Tenant Concentrations | 200 |
Lease Expirations and Terminations | 201 |
Expirations | 201 |
Terminations | 203 |
Other | 204 |
Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal | 206 |
Affiliated Leases | 208 |
Insurance Considerations | 209 |
Use Restrictions | 210 |
Appraised Value | 211 |
Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations | 212 |
Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations | 214 |
Delinquency Information | 216 |
Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans | 216 |
Amortization of Principal | 216 |
Due Dates; Mortgage Rates; Calculations of Interest | 216 |
ARD Loans | 217 |
Single Purpose Entity Covenants | 218 |
Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments | 218 |
“Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions | 220 |
Defeasance | 221 |
Releases; Partial Releases | 222 |
Escrows | 229 |
Mortgaged Property Accounts | 230 |
Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines | 232 |
Additional Indebtedness | 232 |
General | 232 |
Whole Loans | 233 |
Mezzanine Indebtedness | 233 |
Other Secured Indebtedness | 236 |
Preferred Equity | 236 |
Other Unsecured Indebtedness | 237 |
The Whole Loans | 237 |
General | 237 |
The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans | 244 |
Intercreditor Agreement | 244 |
Control Rights with respect to Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans Other Than The Servicing Shift Whole Loans | 245 |
Control Rights with respect to The Servicing Shift Whole Loans | 245 |
Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder | 246 |
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan | 247 |
The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans | 247 |
Intercreditor Agreement | 247 |
Control Rights | 248 |
Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder | 249 |
Custody of the Mortgage File | 250 |
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan | 250 |
The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan | 251 |
Additional Information | 261 |
Transaction Parties | 261 |
9
The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers | 261 |
UBS AG, New York Branch | 262 |
General | 262 |
UBS AG, New York Branch’s Securitization Program | 262 |
Review of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans | 263 |
UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards | 265 |
Exceptions | 268 |
Litigation | 268 |
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act | 268 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 268 |
Ladder Capital Finance LLC | 268 |
General | 268 |
Ladder Capital Group’s Securitization Program | 269 |
Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes | 271 |
Review of LCF Mortgage Loans | 278 |
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act | 280 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 280 |
Société Générale | 280 |
General | 280 |
Société Générale’s Commercial Mortgage Securitization Program | 280 |
Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards | 281 |
Review of the Mortgage Loans for Which Société Générale is the Sponsor | 285 |
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act | 287 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 287 |
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. | 288 |
General | 288 |
CCRE Lending’s Loan Origination and Acquisition History | 288 |
Review of CCRE Mortgage Loans | 289 |
CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards | 290 |
Assessments of Property Condition | 292 |
Exceptions | 296 |
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act | 296 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 297 |
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC | 297 |
General | 297 |
Rialto Mortgage’s Securitization Program | 297 |
Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis | 297 |
Review of Mortgage Loans for Which Rialto Mortgage is the Sponsor | 302 |
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act | 304 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 304 |
CIBC Inc. | 304 |
General | 304 |
CIBC’s Commercial Mortgage Securitization Program | 304 |
CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes | 305 |
Exceptions to CIBC’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines | 311 |
Review of CIBC Mortgage Loans | 311 |
Repurchases and Replacements | 313 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 315 |
Barclays Bank PLC | 315 |
General | 315 |
Barclays’ Securitization Program | 315 |
Review of Barclays Mortgage Loans | 316 |
Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes | 318 |
10
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act | 321 |
Retained Interests in This Securitization | 321 |
The Depositor | 322 |
The Issuing Entity | 323 |
The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator | 323 |
The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer | 326 |
The Primary Servicer | 330 |
Berkeley Point Capital LLC | 330 |
Summary of BPC Primary Servicing Agreement | 332 |
The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer | 338 |
Credit Risk Retention | 340 |
General | 340 |
Qualifying CRE Loans; Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage | 341 |
Material Terms of the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates | 341 |
Material Terms of the Eligible Horizontal Residual Interest | 342 |
The Third Party Purchaser | 343 |
Hedging, Transfer and Financing Restrictions | 344 |
Operating Advisor | 345 |
Representations and Warranties | 346 |
Description of the Certificates | 349 |
General | 349 |
Distributions | 352 |
Method, Timing and Amount | 352 |
Available Funds | 353 |
Priority of Distributions | 355 |
Pass-Through Rates | 358 |
Interest Distribution Amount | 360 |
Principal Distribution Amount | 361 |
Certain Calculations with Respect to Individual Mortgage Loans | 363 |
Excess Interest | 364 |
Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections | 364 |
Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums | 367 |
Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date | 369 |
Prepayment Interest Shortfalls | 370 |
Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses | 371 |
Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information | 374 |
Certificate Administrator Reports | 374 |
Information Available Electronically | 380 |
Voting Rights | 386 |
Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination | 386 |
Book-Entry Registration | 386 |
Definitive Certificates | 390 |
Certificateholder Communication | 390 |
Access to Certificateholders’ Names and Addresses | 390 |
Requests to Communicate | 390 |
List of Certificateholders | 391 |
Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements | 391 |
General | 391 |
Dispute Resolution Provisions | 402 |
Asset Review Obligations | 402 |
Pooling and Servicing Agreement | 403 |
General | 403 |
Assignment of the Mortgage Loans | 403 |
11
Servicing Standard | 404 |
Subservicing | 406 |
Advances | 407 |
P&I Advances | 407 |
Servicing Advances | 408 |
Nonrecoverable Advances | 409 |
Recovery of Advances | 410 |
Accounts | 412 |
Withdrawals from the Collection Account | 414 |
Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses | 417 |
General | 417 |
Master Servicing Compensation | 423 |
Special Servicing Compensation | 426 |
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees | 431 |
Certificate Administrator and Trustee Compensation | 432 |
Operating Advisor Compensation | 432 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation | 433 |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee | 434 |
Appraisal Reduction Amounts | 434 |
Maintenance of Insurance | 441 |
Modifications, Waivers and Amendments | 445 |
Enforcement of “Due-on-Sale” and “Due-on-Encumbrance” Provisions | 449 |
Inspections | 451 |
Collection of Operating Information | 452 |
Special Servicing Transfer Event | 453 |
Asset Status Report | 455 |
Realization Upon Mortgage Loans | 459 |
Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties | 461 |
The Directing Certificateholder | 464 |
General | 464 |
Major Decisions | 466 |
Asset Status Report | 470 |
Replacement of the Special Servicer | 471 |
Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event | 471 |
Servicing Override | 474 |
Rights of the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Servicing Shift Whole Loans | 475 |
Rights of the Holders of Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans | 475 |
Limitation on Liability of Directing Certificateholder | 475 |
The Operating Advisor | 476 |
General | 476 |
Duties of Operating Advisor at All Times | 477 |
Annual Report | 478 |
Additional Duties of Operating Advisor While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event Has Occurred and Is Continuing | 480 |
Recommendation of the Replacement of the Special Servicer | 480 |
Eligibility of Operating Advisor | 480 |
Other Obligations of Operating Advisor | 481 |
Delegation of Operating Advisor’s Duties | 482 |
Termination of the Operating Advisor With Cause | 482 |
Rights Upon Operating Advisor Termination Event | 483 |
12
Waiver of Operating Advisor Termination Event | 484 |
Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause | 484 |
Resignation of the Operating Advisor | 484 |
Operating Advisor Compensation | 485 |
The Asset Representations Reviewer | 485 |
Asset Review | 485 |
Asset Review Trigger | 485 |
Asset Review Vote | 487 |
Review Materials | 487 |
Asset Review | 489 |
Eligibility of Asset Representations Reviewer | 491 |
Other Obligations of Asset Representations Reviewer | 491 |
Delegation of Asset Representations Reviewer’s Duties | 492 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Events | 492 |
Rights Upon Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event | 493 |
Termination of the Asset Representations Reviewer Without Cause | 493 |
Resignation of Asset Representations Reviewer | 494 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation | 494 |
Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause | 494 |
Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote | 497 |
Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause | 498 |
Servicer Termination Events | 498 |
Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event | 500 |
Waiver of Servicer Termination Event | 501 |
Resignation of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer | 502 |
Limitation on Liability; Indemnification | 502 |
Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA | 506 |
Dispute Resolution Provisions | 506 |
Certificateholder’s Rights When a Repurchase Request Is Initially Delivered by a Certificateholder | 506 |
Repurchase Request Delivered by a Party to the PSA | 507 |
Resolution of a Repurchase Request | 508 |
Mediation and Arbitration Provisions | 511 |
Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans | 512 |
General | 512 |
Rating Agency Confirmations | 516 |
Evidence as to Compliance | 518 |
Limitation on Rights of Certificateholders to Institute a Proceeding | 519 |
Termination; Retirement of Certificates | 520 |
Amendment | 521 |
Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator | 524 |
Governing Law; Waiver of Jury Trial; and Consent to Jurisdiction | 525 |
Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans | 525 |
General | 527 |
Types of Mortgage Instruments | 527 |
Leases and Rents | 528 |
Personalty | 528 |
Foreclosure | 529 |
General | 529 |
Foreclosure Procedures Vary from State to State | 529 |
Judicial Foreclosure | 529 |
Equitable and Other Limitations on Enforceability of Certain Provisions | 529 |
13
Nonjudicial Foreclosure/Power of Sale | 530 |
Public Sale | 530 |
Rights of Redemption | 531 |
Anti-Deficiency Legislation | 532 |
Leasehold Considerations | 532 |
Cooperative Shares | 533 |
Bankruptcy Laws | 533 |
Environmental Considerations | 540 |
General | 540 |
Superlien Laws | 540 |
CERCLA | 540 |
Certain Other Federal and State Laws | 541 |
Additional Considerations | 541 |
Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions | 542 |
Subordinate Financing | 542 |
Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments | 542 |
Applicability of Usury Laws | 542 |
Americans with Disabilities Act | 543 |
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act | 543 |
Anti-Money Laundering, Economic Sanctions and Bribery | 544 |
Potential Forfeiture of Assets | 544 |
Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties | 545 |
Pending Legal Proceedings Involving Transaction Parties | 548 |
Use of Proceeds | 548 |
Yield and Maturity Considerations | 548 |
Yield Considerations | 548 |
General | 548 |
Rate and Timing of Principal Payments | 548 |
Losses and Shortfalls | 550 |
Certain Relevant Factors Affecting Loan Payments and Defaults | 550 |
Delay in Payment of Distributions | 551 |
Yield on the Certificates with Notional Amounts | 552 |
Weighted Average Life | 552 |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity Tables | 557 |
Material Federal Income Tax Considerations | 562 |
General | 562 |
Qualification as a REMIC | 563 |
Status of Offered Certificates | 565 |
Taxation of Regular Interests | 565 |
General | 565 |
Original Issue Discount | 566 |
Acquisition Premium | 568 |
Market Discount | 568 |
Premium | 569 |
Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method | 570 |
Treatment of Losses | 570 |
Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums | 571 |
Sale or Exchange of Regular Interests | 571 |
Taxes That May Be Imposed on a REMIC | 572 |
Prohibited Transactions | 572 |
Contributions to a REMIC After the Startup Day | 572 |
Net Income from Foreclosure Property | 573 |
14
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 | 573 |
Taxation of Certain Foreign Investors | 574 |
FATCA | 575 |
Backup Withholding | 575 |
Information Reporting | 575 |
3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income” | 575 |
Reporting Requirements | 576 |
Certain State and Local Tax Considerations | 577 |
Method of Distribution (Underwriter) | 577 |
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference | 581 |
Where You Can Find More Information | 581 |
Financial Information | 582 |
Certain ERISA Considerations | 582 |
General | 582 |
Plan Asset Regulations | 583 |
Administrative Exemptions | 583 |
Insurance Company General Accounts | 586 |
Legal Investment | 587 |
Legal Matters | 588 |
Ratings | 588 |
Index of Defined Terms | 591 |
Annex A-1: | Certain Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans and Mortgaged Properties | A-1-1 |
Annex A-2: | Mortgage Pool Information (Tables) | A-2-1 |
Annex A-3: | Summaries of the Fifteen Largest Mortgage Loans | A-3-1 |
Annex B: | Form of Distribution Date Statement | B-1 |
Annex C: | Form of Operating Advisor Annual Report | C-1 |
Annex D-1: | Mortgage Loan Representations and Warranties | D-1-1 |
Annex D-2: | Exceptions to Mortgage Loan Representations and Warranties | D-2-1 |
Annex E: | Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance Schedule | E-1 |
15
Important Notice Regarding the Offered Certificates
WE HAVE FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION A REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, WITH RESPECT TO THE CERTIFICATES OFFERED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. HOWEVER, THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OUR REGISTRATION STATEMENT. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THIS PROSPECTUS, YOU SHOULD REFER TO OUR REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS TO IT. OUR REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS TO IT CAN BE INSPECTED AND COPIED AT PRESCRIBED RATES AT THE PUBLIC REFERENCE FACILITIES MAINTAINED BY THE SEC AT ITS PUBLIC REFERENCE ROOM, 100 F STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549. YOU MAY OBTAIN INFORMATION ON THE OPERATION OF THE PUBLIC REFERENCE ROOM BY CALLING THE SEC AT 1-800-SEC-0330. COPIES OF THESE MATERIALS CAN ALSO BE OBTAINED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE SEC’S INTERNET WEBSITE (HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV).
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES REFERRED TO IN THIS PROSPECTUS ARE OFFERED ON A “WHEN, AS AND IF ISSUED” BASIS.
THE UNDERWRITERS DESCRIBED IN THESE MATERIALS MAY FROM TIME TO TIME PERFORM INVESTMENT BANKING SERVICES FOR, OR SOLICIT INVESTMENT BANKING BUSINESS FROM, ANY COMPANY NAMED IN THESE MATERIALS. THE UNDERWRITERS AND/OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES MAY FROM TIME TO TIME HAVE A LONG OR SHORT POSITION IN ANY CONTRACT OR CERTIFICATE DISCUSSED IN THESE MATERIALS.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPERSEDES ANY PREVIOUS SUCH INFORMATION DELIVERED TO ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR.
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES DO NOT REPRESENT AN INTEREST IN OR OBLIGATION OF THE DEPOSITOR, THE SPONSORS, THE MORTGAGE LOAN SELLERS, THE MASTER SERVICER, THE SPECIAL SERVICER, THE TRUSTEE, THE OPERATING ADVISOR, THE ASSET REPRESENTATIONS REVIEWER, THE CERTIFICATE ADMINISTRATOR, THE DIRECTING CERTIFICATEHOLDER, THE UNDERWRITERS OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE AFFILIATES. NEITHER THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES NOR THE MORTGAGE LOANS ARE INSURED OR GUARANTEED BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OR INSTRUMENTALITY OR PRIVATE INSURER.
THERE IS CURRENTLY NO SECONDARY MARKET FOR THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. WE CANNOT ASSURE YOU THAT A SECONDARY MARKET WILL DEVELOP OR, IF A SECONDARY MARKET DOES DEVELOP, THAT IT WILL PROVIDE HOLDERS OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES WITH LIQUIDITY OF INVESTMENT OR THAT IT WILL CONTINUE FOR THE TERM OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. THE UNDERWRITERS CURRENTLY INTEND TO MAKE A MARKET IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BUT ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO. ACCORDINGLY, PURCHASERS MUST BE PREPARED TO BEAR THE RISKS OF THEIR INVESTMENTS FOR AN INDEFINITE PERIOD. SEE “RISK FACTORS—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline”.
16
Important Notice About Information Presented in this Prospectus
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus.
This prospectus begins with several introductory sections describing the certificates and the issuing entity in abbreviated form:
● | Summary of Certificates, commencing on page 3 of this prospectus, which sets forth important statistical information relating to the certificates; |
● | Summary of Terms, commencing on page 24 of this prospectus, which gives a brief introduction of the key features of the certificates and a description of the mortgage loans; and |
● | Risk Factors, commencing on page 63 of this prospectus, which describes risks that apply to the certificates. |
This prospectus includes cross references to sections in this prospectus where you can find further related discussions. The table of contents in this prospectus identifies the pages where these sections are located.
Certain capitalized terms are defined and used in this prospectus to assist you in understanding the terms of the offered certificates and this offering. The capitalized terms used in this prospectus are defined on the pages indicated under the caption “Index of Defined Terms”, commencing on page 591 of this prospectus.
All annexes and schedules attached to this prospectus are a part of this prospectus.
In this prospectus:
● | the terms “depositor”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.; |
● | references to any specified mortgage loan should be construed to refer to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property (or portfolio of mortgaged properties) with the same name identified on Annex A-1, representing the approximate percentage of the initial pool balance set forth on Annex A-1; |
● | references to a “pooling and servicing agreement” (other than the UBS 2018-C8 pooling and servicing agreement) governing the servicing of any mortgage loan should be construed to refer to any relevant pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or other primary transaction agreement governing the servicing of such mortgage loan; and |
● | references to “lender” or “mortgage lender” with respect to a mortgage loan generally should be construed to mean, from and after the date of initial issuance of the offered certificates, the trustee on behalf of the issuing entity as the holder of record title to the mortgage loans or the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, with respect to the obligations and rights of the lender as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
17
Until ninety days after the date of this prospectus, all dealers that buy, sell or trade the offered certificates, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS WITHIN EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA
THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (AS DEFINED BELOW).
THE CERTIFICATES ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA (THE “EEA”). FOR THESE PURPOSES, A RETAIL INVESTOR MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF: (I) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (11) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, “MIFID II”); OR (II) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE 2002/92/EC, WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (10) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF MIFID II; OR (III) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN THE DIRECTIVE 2003/71/EC (AS AMENDED, THE “PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE”). CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 (THE “PRIIPS REGULATION” ) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE CERTIFICATES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE EEA HAS BEEN PREPARED AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE CERTIFICATES OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EEA MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE PRIIPS REGULATION.
FURTHERMORE, THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFER OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN THE EEA WILL ONLY BE MADE TO A LEGAL ENTITY WHICH IS A QUALIFIED INVESTOR UNDER THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE. ACCORDINGLY, ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN THE EEA OF THE CERTIFICATES MAY ONLY DO SO WITH RESPECT TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS. NONE OF THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR, OR THE UNDERWRITERS HAS AUTHORIZED, NOR DOES ANY OF THEM AUTHORIZE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES OTHER THAN TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS.
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA SELLING RESTRICTIONS
EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT:
it has not offered, sold or otherwise made available and will not offer, sell or otherwise make available any Offered Certificates to any retail investor in the European Economic Area. For the purposes of this provision:
(i) the expression “retail investor” means a person who is one (or more) of the following:
(A) a retail client as defined in point (11) of Article 4(1) of MIFID II; or
(B) a customer within the meaning of Directive 2002/92/EC, where that customer would not qualify as a professional client as defined in point (10) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II; or
(C) not a qualified investor as defined in THE PROSPECTUS Directive; and
18
(ii) the expression “offer” includes the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the Offered Certificates to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the Offered Certificates.
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
THE ISSUING ENTITY MAY CONSTITUTE A “COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME” AS DEFINED BY SECTION 235 OF THE FSMA THAT IS NOT A “RECOGNIZED COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME” FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE FSMA AND THAT HAS NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED, REGULATED OR OTHERWISE RECOGNIZED OR APPROVED. AS AN UNREGULATED SCHEME, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES CANNOT BE MARKETED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FSMA.
THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PROSPECTUS (AND ANY SUPPLEMENT HERETO) (A) IF MADE BY A PERSON WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED PERSON UNDER THE FSMA, IS BEING MADE ONLY TO, OR DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS WHO (I) ARE OUTSIDE THE UNITED KINGDOM, OR (II) HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL PROMOTION) ORDER 2005, AS AMENDED (THE “FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER”), OR (III) ARE PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 49(2)(A) THROUGH (D) (“HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.”) OF THE FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER OR (IV) ARE ANY OTHER PERSONS TO WHOM IT MAY OTHERWISE LAWFULLY BE MADE UNDER THE FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS “FPO PERSONS”); AND (B) IF MADE BY A PERSON WHO IS AN AUTHORIZED PERSON UNDER THE FSMA, IS BEING MADE ONLY TO, OR DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS WHO (I) ARE OUTSIDE THE UNITED KINGDOM, OR (II) HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 14(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES) (EXEMPTIONS) ORDER 2001 (THE “PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER”), OR (III) ARE PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 22(2)(A) THROUGH (D) (“HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.”) OF THE PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER, OR (IV) ARE PERSONS TO WHOM THE ISSUING ENTITY MAY LAWFULLY BE PROMOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 4.12 OF THE UK FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY’S CONDUCT OF BUSINESS SOURCEBOOK (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS “PCIS PERSONS” AND, TOGETHER WITH THE FPO PERSONS, THE “RELEVANT PERSONS”).
THIS PROSPECTUS (AND ANY SUPPLEMENT HERETO) MUST NOT BE ACTED ON OR RELIED ON BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY INVESTMENT OR INVESTMENT ACTIVITY TO WHICH THIS PROSPECTUS (AND ANY SUPPLEMENT HERETO) RELATES, INCLUDING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO RELEVANT PERSONS AND WILL BE ENGAGED IN ONLY WITH RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY PERSONS OTHER THAN RELEVANT PERSONS SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON THIS PROSPECTUS (AND ANY SUPPLEMENT HERETO).
POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM ARE ADVISED THAT ALL, OR MOST, OF THE PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM REGULATORY SYSTEM WILL NOT APPLY TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES AND THAT COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE UNITED KINGDOM FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPENSATION SCHEME.
19
UNITED KINGDOM SELLING RESTRICTIONS
EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT:
(A) IT HAS ONLY COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED AND WILL ONLY COMMUNICATE OR CAUSE TO BE COMMUNICATED AN INVITATION OR INDUCEMENT TO ENGAGE IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 21 OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (“FSMA”) RECEIVED BY IT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUE OR SALE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SECTION 21(1) OF THE FSMA DOES NOT APPLY TO THE ISSUING ENTITY OR THE DEPOSITOR; AND
(B) IT HAS COMPLIED AND WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FSMA WITH RESPECT TO ANYTHING DONE BY IT IN RELATION TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN, FROM OR OTHERWISE INVOLVING THE UNITED KINGDOM.
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES WILL NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (EXCLUDING HONG KONG, MACAU AND TAIWAN, THE “PRC”) AS PART OF THE INITIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BUT MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE BY INVESTORS RESIDENT IN THE PRC FROM OUTSIDE THE PRC.
THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES IN THE PRC TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE THE OFFER OR SOLICITATION IN THE PRC.
THE DEPOSITOR DOES NOT REPRESENT THAT THIS PROSPECTUS MAY BE LAWFULLY DISTRIBUTED, OR THAT ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE LAWFULLY OFFERED, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE REGISTRATION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IN THE PRC, OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION AVAILABLE THEREUNDER, OR ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR FACILITATING ANY SUCH DISTRIBUTION OR OFFERING. IN PARTICULAR, NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE DEPOSITOR WHICH WOULD PERMIT AN OFFERING OF ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PROSPECTUS IN THE PRC. ACCORDINGLY, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE NOT BEING OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE PRC BY MEANS OF THIS PROSPECTUS OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT. NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY ADVERTISEMENT OR OTHER OFFERING MATERIAL MAY BE DISTRIBUTED OR PUBLISHED IN THE PRC, EXCEPT UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WILL RESULT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
HONG KONG
THIS PROSPECTUS HAS NOT BEEN DELIVERED FOR REGISTRATION TO THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES IN HONG KONG AND THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY ANY REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN HONG KONG. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE NOR INTEND TO BE AN OFFER OR INVITATION TO THE PUBLIC IN HONG KONG TO ACQUIRE THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES.
EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED, WARRANTED AND AGREED THAT: (1) IT HAS NOT OFFERED OR SOLD AND WILL NOT OFFER OR SELL IN HONG KONG, BY MEANS OF ANY DOCUMENT, ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES (EXCEPT FOR CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE A “STRUCTURED PRODUCT” AS DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571) (THE “SFO”) OF HONG KONG) OTHER THAN (A) TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN THE SFO AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE SFO; OR (B) IN
20
OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH DO NOT RESULT IN THE DOCUMENT BEING A “PROSPECTUS” AS DEFINED IN THE COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE (CAP. 32) (THE “C(WUMP)O”) OF HONG KONG OR WHICH DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE C(WUMP)O; AND (2) IT HAS NOT ISSUED OR HAD IN ITS POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUE, AND WILL NOT ISSUE OR HAVE IN ITS POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUE, WHETHER IN HONG KONG OR ELSEWHERE, ANY ADVERTISEMENT, INVITATION OR DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, WHICH IS DIRECTED AT, OR THE CONTENTS OF WHICH ARE LIKELY TO BE ACCESSED OR READ BY, THE PUBLIC OF HONG KONG (EXCEPT IF PERMITTED TO DO SO UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF HONG KONG) OTHER THAN WITH RESPECT TO OFFERED CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE OR ARE INTENDED TO BE DISPOSED OF ONLY TO PERSONS OUTSIDE HONG KONG OR ONLY TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN THE SFO AND ANY RULES MADE UNDER THE SFO.
W A R N I N G
THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY ANY REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN HONG KONG. YOU ARE ADVISED TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN RELATION TO THE OFFER. IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT ABOUT ANY OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS, YOU SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE.
SINGAPORE
NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT OR MATERIAL IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OFFER OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAS BEEN REGISTERED AS A PROSPECTUS WITH THE MONETARY AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE (“MAS”) UNDER THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289) OF SINGAPORE (THE “SFA”). ACCORDINGLY, MAS ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS AS DEFINED IN THE SFA AND STATUTORY LIABILITY UNDER THE SFA IN RELATION TO THE CONTENTS OF PROSPECTUSES WOULD NOT APPLY. ANY PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR SHOULD CONSIDER CAREFULLY WHETHER THE INVESTMENT IS SUITABLE FOR IT. THIS PROSPECTUS AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENT OR MATERIAL IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER OR SALE, OR INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY NOT BE CIRCULATED OR DISTRIBUTED, NOR MAY THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BE OFFERED OR SOLD, OR BE MADE THE SUBJECT OF AN INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, WHETHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO PERSONS IN SINGAPORE OTHER THAN (I) TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE SFA, (II) TO A RELEVANT PERSON (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 275(2) OF THE SFA), OR ANY PERSON PURSUANT TO SECTION 275(1A) OF THE SFA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 275 OF THE SFA OR (III) OTHERWISE PURSUANT TO, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF, ANY OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE SFA.
WHERE THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE SUBSCRIBED OR PURCHASED UNDER SECTION 275 OF THE SFA BY A RELEVANT PERSON WHICH IS: (A) A CORPORATION (WHICH IS NOT AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 4A OF THE SFA)) THE SOLE BUSINESS OF WHICH IS TO HOLD INVESTMENTS AND THE ENTIRE SHARE CAPITAL OF WHICH IS OWNED BY ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS, EACH OF WHOM IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR; OR (B) A TRUST (WHERE THE TRUSTEE IS NOT AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR) WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO HOLD INVESTMENTS AND EACH BENEFICIARY IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR, SECURITIES (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 239(1) OF THE SFA) OF THAT CORPORATION OR THE BENEFICIARIES’ RIGHTS AND INTEREST (HOWSOEVER DESCRIBED) IN THAT TRUST SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERABLE FOR 6 MONTHS AFTER THAT CORPORATION OR THAT TRUST HAS
21
ACQUIRED THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES UNDER SECTION 275 OF THE SFA EXCEPT: (1) TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE SFA OR TO A RELEVANT PERSON (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 275(2) OF THE SFA), OR TO ANY PERSON PURSUANT TO AN OFFER THAT IS MADE ON TERMS THAT SUCH SHARES, DEBENTURES AND UNITS OF SHARES AND DEBENTURES OF THAT CORPORATION OR SUCH RIGHTS OR INTEREST IN THAT TRUST ARE ACQUIRED AT A CONSIDERATION OF NOT LESS THAN 200,000 SINGAPORE DOLLARS (OR ITS EQUIVALENT IN A FOREIGN CURRENCY) FOR EACH TRANSACTION, WHETHER SUCH AMOUNT IS TO BE PAID FOR IN CASH OR BY EXCHANGE OF SECURITIES OR OTHER ASSETS, AND FURTHER FOR CORPORATIONS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 275(1A) OF THE SFA; (2) WHERE NO CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN FOR THE TRANSFER; (3) WHERE THE TRANSFER IS BY OPERATION OF LAW; OR (4) AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 276(7) OF THE SFA.
SOUTH KOREA
THESE CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION OF SOUTH KOREA FOR A PUBLIC OFFERING IN SOUTH KOREA. THE UNDERWRITERS HAVE THEREFORE REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT THE CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR DELIVERED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OR OFFERED, SOLD OR DELIVERED TO ANY PERSON FOR RE-OFFERING OR RESALE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN SOUTH KOREA OR TO ANY RESIDENT OF SOUTH KOREA, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE KOREAN LAWS AND REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE FINANCIAL INVESTMENT SERVICES AND CAPITAL MARKETS ACT AND THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS LAW AND THE DECREES AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER.
JAPAN
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND EXCHANGE LAW OF JAPAN, AS AMENDED (THE “FIEL”), AND DISCLOSURE UNDER THE FIEL HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. ACCORDINGLY, EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT IT HAS NOT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OFFERED OR SOLD AND WILL NOT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OFFER OR SELL ANY OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN JAPAN OR TO, OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF, ANY RESIDENT OF JAPAN (WHICH TERM AS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MEANS ANY PERSON RESIDENT IN JAPAN, INCLUDING ANY CORPORATION OR OTHER ENTITY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF JAPAN) OR TO OTHERS FOR REOFFERING OR RE-SALE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN JAPAN OR TO, OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF, ANY RESIDENT OF JAPAN EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF, AND OTHERWISE IN COMPLIANCE WITH, THE FIEL AND OTHER RELEVANT LAWS, REGULATIONS AND MINISTERIAL GUIDELINES OF JAPAN. AS PART OF THIS OFFERING OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OFFER THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN JAPAN TO UP TO 49 OFFEREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE PROVISIONS.
NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF CANADA
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY BE SOLD IN CANADA ONLY TO PURCHASERS PURCHASING, OR DEEMED TO BE PURCHASING, AS PRINCIPAL THAT ARE ACCREDITED INVESTORS, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 45-106 PROSPECTUS EXEMPTIONS OR SUBSECTION 73.3(1) OF THE SECURITIES ACT (ONTARIO), AND ARE PERMITTED CLIENTS, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS. ANY RESALE OF THE OFFERED
22
CERTIFICATES MUST BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE PROSPECTUS REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS.
SECURITIES LEGISLATION IN CERTAIN PROVINCES OR TERRITORIES OF CANADA MAY PROVIDE A PURCHASER WITH REMEDIES FOR RESCISSION OR DAMAGES IF THIS PROSPECTUS (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENT THERETO) CONTAINS A MISREPRESENTATION, PROVIDED THAT THE REMEDIES FOR RESCISSION OR DAMAGES ARE EXERCISED BY THE PURCHASER WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF THE PURCHASER’S PROVINCE OR TERRITORY. THE PURCHASER SHOULD REFER TO ANY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF THE PURCHASER’S PROVINCE OR TERRITORY FOR PARTICULARS OF THESE RIGHTS OR CONSULT WITH A LEGAL ADVISOR.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 3A.3 OF NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 33-105 UNDERWRITING CONFLICTS (“NI 33-105”), THE UNDERWRITERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF NI 33-105 REGARDING UNDERWRITER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING.
23
Summary of Terms
This summary highlights selected information from this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information you need to consider in making your investment decision. To understand all of the terms of the offering of the offered certificates, read this entire document carefully. |
Relevant Parties
Title of Certificates | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C8. |
Depositor | UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., a Delaware corporation. All the shares of capital stock of the depositor, are held by UBS Americas, Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG. The depositor’s address is 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019 and its telephone number is (212) 713-2000. See “Transaction Parties—The Depositor”. |
Issuing Entity | UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8, a New York common law trust, to be established on the closing date under the pooling and servicing agreement. For more detailed information, see “Transaction Parties—The Issuing Entity”. |
Sponsors and Originators | The sponsors of this transaction are: |
● | UBS AG, by and through its branch office at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York (referred to herein as “UBS AG, New York Branch”), an Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulated branch of a foreign bank |
● | Ladder Capital Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
● | Société Générale, a société anonyme organized under the laws of France |
● | Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership |
● | Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
● | CIBC Inc., a Delaware corporation |
● | Barclays Bank PLC, a public limited company registered in England and Wales |
These entities are sometimes also referred to in this prospectus as the “mortgage loan sellers”. |
24
The sponsors originated, co-originated or acquired and will transfer to the depositor the mortgage loans set forth in the following chart: |
Sellers of the Mortgage Loans |
Mortgage Loan Seller | Originator | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Principal Balance of Mortgage Loans | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | |||||
Ladder Capital Finance LLC | Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate | 18 | $ 240,914,103 | 23.1% | |||||
UBS AG, New York Branch | UBS AG, New York Branch(1)(2)(3) | 13 | 185,760,271 | 17.8 | |||||
Société Générale | Société Générale(1)(4)(5) | 6 | 180,386,589 | 17.3 | |||||
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. | Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.(2) | 6 | 134,620,128 | 12.9 | |||||
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC | Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC | 8 | 112,425,000 | 10.8 | |||||
CIBC Inc. | CIBC Inc. | 9 | 98,083,420 | 9.4 | |||||
Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | 7 | 92,978,380 | 8.9 | |||||
Total | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% |
(1) | One (1) mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 5.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is part of a whole loan that was co-originated by Société Générale and UBS AG, New York Branch. The mortgage loan is evidenced by four promissory notes, Note A-1 and Note A-5, with principal balances of $25,000,000 and $10,000,000, respectively, as of the cut-off date and representing in the aggregate approximately 3.3% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, as to which Société Générale is acting as mortgage loan seller and Note A-10 and Note A-15, with principal balances of $20,000,000 and $5,000,000, respectively, as of the cut-off date and representing in the aggregate approximately 2.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, as to which UBS AG, New York Branch is acting as mortgage loan seller. The “Number of Mortgage Loans” shown in the table above for Société Générale do not include the notes for which Société Générale is acting as mortgage loan seller; however, the “Aggregate Cut-off Date Principal Balance of Mortgage Loans” and the “Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance” shown in the table above for Société Générale do include these notes. Such mortgage loan was underwritten pursuant to the Société Générale’s and UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines. |
(2) | One (1) mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, representing approximately 5.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is part of a whole loan that was originated by Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. Certain notes evidencing the whole loan were subsequently acquired by UBS AG, New York Branch. The mortgage loan is evidenced by six promissory notes, Note A-1-2, Note A-1-3 and Note A-1-4, with principal balances of $12,986,254, $9,989,426 and $5,244,449, respectively, as of the cut-off date and representing in the aggregate approximately 2.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, as to which Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. is acting as mortgage loan seller and Note A-2-2, Note A-2-3 and Note A-2-4, with principal balances of $12,986,254. $9,989,426 and $5,244,449, respectively, as of the cut-off date and representing in the aggregate approximately 2.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, as to which UBS AG, New York Branch is acting as mortgage loan seller. The “Number of Mortgage Loans” shown in the table above for Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. do not include the notes for |
25
which Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. is acting as mortgage loan seller; however, the “Aggregate Cut-off Date Principal Balance of Mortgage Loans” and the “Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance” shown in the table above for Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. do include these notes. Such mortgage loan was underwritten pursuant to the Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. underwriting guidelines and subsequently reunderwritten pursuant to UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines. |
(3) | One (1) mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is part of a whole loan that was co-originated by Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC and UBS AG, New York Branch. Such mortgage loan was underwritten pursuant to UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines. |
(4) | One (1) mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A-1 as Houston Distribution Center, representing approximately 4.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is part of a whole loan that was co-originated by Société Générale and Barclays Bank PLC. Such mortgage loan was underwritten pursuant to Société Générale’s underwriting guidelines. |
(5) | One (1) mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is part of a whole loan that was co-originated by Société Générale and Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. Such mortgage loan was underwritten pursuant to Société Générale’s underwriting guidelines. |
See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. |
Credit Risk Retention | This transaction is being structured with a “third party purchaser” that will acquire an “eligible horizontal residual interest”, which will be comprised of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates. KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P. or its majority-owned affiliate (in satisfaction of the retention obligations of UBS AG, New York Branch in its capacity as the retaining sponsor) will be contractually obligated to retain these classes of certificates for a minimum of five years after the closing date, subject to certain permitted exceptions provided for under the credit risk retention rules. During this time, KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P. will agree to comply with hedging, transfer and financing restrictions that are applicable to third party purchasers under the credit risk retention rules. It is anticipated that, on the closing date, KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P. will satisfy its obligation to retain these classes of certificates by the acquisition thereof by its majority-owned affiliate, KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P. For additional information, see “Credit Risk Retention”. |
Master Servicer | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, a national banking association, is expected to act as the master servicer. The master servicer will be responsible for the master servicing and administration of the mortgage loans and any related |
26
companion loan pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement (other than any mortgage loan or companion loan that is part of a whole loan and serviced under the related pooling and servicing agreement related to the transaction indicated in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below). The principal servicing office of the master servicer is located at 10851 Mastin Street, Building 82, Suite 300, Overland Park, Kansas 66210, and its telephone number is (913) 253-9000. See “Transaction Parties—The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
Prior to the related servicing shift securitization date, a servicing shift whole loan will be serviced by the master servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after the related servicing shift securitization date, a servicing shift whole loan will be serviced under, and by the master servicer designated in, the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Each non-serviced mortgage loan will be serviced by the master servicer set forth in the table below under the heading “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans”. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Special Servicer | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, a national banking association, is expected to act as special servicer with respect to the mortgage loans (other than any excluded special servicer loans) and any related companion loan other than with respect to the non-serviced mortgage loans and related companion loan(s) set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below. The special servicer will be primarily responsible for (i) making decisions and performing certain servicing functions with respect to such mortgage loans and related companion loans as to which a special servicing transfer event (such as a default or an imminent default) has occurred and (ii) generally, reviewing, evaluating and processing and/or providing or withholding consent as to certain major decisions and all special servicer non-major decisions relating to such mortgage loans and any related companion loan for which a special servicing |
27
transfer event has not occurred, in each case pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction. Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association was selected to be the special servicer by KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P., or its affiliate, which, on the closing date, is expected to be appointed as the initial directing certificateholder (other than with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder”. The primary servicing office of the special servicer is located at 10851 Mastin Street, Building 82, Suite 300, Overland Park, Kansas 66210, and its telephone number is (913) 253- 9000. See “Transaction Parties—The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
If the special servicer obtains knowledge that it has become a borrower party with respect to any mortgage loan (other than a non-serviced mortgage loan) or serviced whole loan (such mortgage loan or serviced whole loan referred to herein as an “excluded special servicer loan”), the special servicer will be required to resign as special servicer of that excluded special servicer loan. Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a control termination event under the pooling and servicing agreement, the directing certificateholder or the controlling class certificateholder on its behalf will be required to select a separate special servicer that is not a borrower party (referred to herein as an “excluded special servicer”) with respect to any excluded special servicer loan, unless such excluded special servicer loan is also an excluded loan. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a control termination event, if at any time the applicable excluded special servicer loan is also an excluded loan or if the directing certificateholder is entitled to appoint the excluded special servicer but does not so appoint within 30 days of notice of resignation, the resigning special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to select the related excluded special servicer. See “—Directing Certificateholder” below and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause”. Any excluded special servicer will be required to perform all of the obligations of the special servicer and will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such excluded special servicer loan earned during such time as the related mortgage loan is an excluded special servicer loan. |
Prior to the related servicing shift securitization date, a servicing shift whole loan, if necessary, will be specially |
28
serviced by the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after the related servicing shift securitization date, a servicing shift whole loan will be specially serviced, if necessary, under, and by the special servicer designated in, the related servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
The special servicer of each non-serviced mortgage loan is set forth in the table below titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans”. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Primary Servicer | Berkeley Point Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, will act as primary servicer with respect to the mortgage loans secured by the mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, 4851 South Alameda Street and Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony, representing approximately 7.2% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, which will be transferred to the issuing entity by Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. See “Transaction Parties—The Primary Servicer—Berkeley Point Capital LLC”. In addition, with respect to three (3) mortgage loans secured by the mortgaged properties or portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as South Bend Medical Office, Quakertown Shopping Center and Boulevard I & II, representing approximately 3.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date that will be transferred to the issuing entity by Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., Berkeley Point Capital LLC will have the right to assume limited subservicing duties consisting of performing inspections and collecting financial statements. The principal servicing office of Berkeley Point Capital LLC is located at One Beacon Street, 14th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02108. The master servicer will pay the fees of the primary servicer or servicers to the extent such fees are received. Berkeley Point Capital LLC is an affiliate of Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., a sponsor, a mortgage loan seller and an originator, and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., an underwriter. |
Trustee | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is expected to act as trustee. The corporate trust office of the trustee is located at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045. Following the transfer of the mortgage loans, |
29
and subject to the discussion in the next paragraph, the trustee, on behalf of the issuing entity, will become the mortgagee of record for each mortgage loan (other than a non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related companion loan. See “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
The trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement will become the mortgagee of record with respect to a servicing shift mortgage loan if the related whole loan becomes a specially serviced loan prior to the related servicing shift securitization date. From and after the related servicing shift securitization date, the mortgagee of record with respect to a servicing shift mortgage loan will be the trustee designated in the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. |
With respect to each non-serviced mortgage loan, the entity set forth in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below, in its capacity as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement for the indicated transaction, is the mortgagee of record for that non-serviced mortgage loan and any related companion loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Certificate Administrator | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national banking association, is expected to act as the certificate administrator. The certificate administrator will also be required to act as custodian, certificate registrar, REMIC administrator, 17g-5 information provider and authenticating agent. The corporate trust offices of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association are located at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045, and for certificate transfer purposes are located at 600 South 4th Street, 7th Floor, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479. See “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”. |
The custodian with respect to the servicing shift mortgage loans will initially be the certificate administrator, in its capacity as custodian under the pooling and servicing agreement. From and after the related servicing shift securitization date, the custodian of the mortgage file for a servicing shift mortgage loan (other than the promissory note evidencing such servicing shift mortgage loan) will be the custodian under the related servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
30
The custodian with respect to each non-serviced mortgage loan will be the entity set forth in the table below titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans”, as custodian under the or pooling and servicing agreement for the indicated transaction. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Operating Advisor | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Park Bridge Financial LLC, is expected to act as the operating advisor. The operating advisor will have certain review and reporting responsibilities with respect to the performance of the special servicer, and in certain circumstances may recommend to the certificateholders that the special servicer be replaced. The operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights as operating advisor under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction with respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan or servicing shift whole loan or any related REO property. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”. |
Asset Representations |
Reviewer | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Park Bridge Financial LLC, is also expected to act as asset representations reviewer. The asset representations reviewer will be required to review certain delinquent mortgage loans after a specified delinquency threshold has been exceeded and the required percentage of certificateholders vote to direct a review of such delinquent mortgage loans. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Asset Representations Reviewer”. |
Directing Certificateholder | Subject to the rights of the related controlling pari passu companion loan holder with respect to a servicing shift whole loan prior to the servicing shift securitization date, the directing certificateholder will have certain consent and consultation rights in certain circumstances with respect to the mortgage loans (other than any excluded loans as described in the next paragraph), as further described in this prospectus. The directing certificateholder will generally be the controlling class certificateholder (or its representative) selected by more than a specified percentage of the controlling class certificateholders (by certificate balance, as certified by the certificate registrar from time to time as provided for in the pooling and servicing agreement). |
31
An “excluded loan” is (i) a mortgage loan or whole loan (other than a servicing shift whole loan) with respect to which the directing certificateholder or the holder of the majority of the controlling class certificates (by certificate principal balance) is, or (ii) a servicing shift whole loan with respect to which the loan-specific directing certificateholder is, a borrower, a mortgagor, a manager of a mortgaged property, the holder of a mezzanine loan that has been accelerated or as to which foreclosure or enforcement proceedings have been commenced against the equity collateral pledged to secure the related mezzanine loan, or certain affiliates thereof. However, in certain circumstances (such as when no directing certificateholder has been appointed and no one holder owns the largest aggregate certificate balance of the controlling class) there may be no directing certificateholder even if there is a controlling class. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder”. |
The controlling class will be the most subordinate class of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates then outstanding that has an aggregate certificate balance, as notionally reduced by any cumulative appraisal reduction amounts allocable to such class, at least equal to 25% of the initial certificate balance of that class; provided, however, that if at any time the certificate balances of the certificates other than the control eligible certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of principal payments on the mortgage loans, then the controlling class will be the most subordinate class of control eligible certificates that has a certificate balance greater than zero without regard to any cumulative appraisal reduction amounts. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, during such time as the Class D-RR certificates would be the controlling class, the holders of such certificates will have the right to irrevocably waive their right to appoint a directing certificateholder or to exercise any of the rights of the controlling class certificateholder. No class of certificates, other than as described above, will be eligible to act as the controlling class or appoint a directing certificateholder. |
On the closing date KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P. will purchase the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR and Class Z certificates, and that KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P., or its affiliate will be appointed as the initial directing certificateholder with respect to each mortgage loan (other than (i) any non-serviced mortgage loan, (ii) any servicing shift mortgage loan, and (iii) any excluded loan). |
32
With respect to a servicing shift whole loan, the holder of the related companion loan identified in the related intercreditor agreement as the controlling note will be the controlling noteholder with respect to such servicing shift whole loan, and will be entitled to certain consent and consultation rights with respect to such servicing shift whole loan, which are substantially similar, but not identical, to those of the directing certificateholder under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization. From and after the related servicing shift securitization date, the rights of the controlling noteholder of such servicing shift whole loan are expected to exercisable by the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) under the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. The directing certificateholder under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization will generally only have limited consultation rights with respect to certain servicing matters or mortgage loan modifications affecting the servicing shift mortgage loans. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”. |
Each entity identified in the table titled “Non-Serviced Whole Loans” under “—The Mortgage Pool—Whole Loans” below is the initial directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) under the pooling and servicing agreement for the indicated transaction and will have certain consent and consultation rights with respect to the related non-serviced whole loan, which are substantially similar, but not identical, to those of the directing certificateholder under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization, subject to similar appraisal mechanics. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Certain Affiliations |
and Relationships | The originators, the sponsors, the underwriters, and parties to the pooling and servicing agreement have various roles in this transaction as well as certain relationships with parties to this transaction and certain of their affiliates. These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as further described under “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest” and “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”. |
33
Significant Obligor | There are no significant obligors related to the issuing entity. |
Relevant Dates And Periods |
Cut-off Date | The mortgage loans will be considered part of the trust fund as of their respective cut-off dates. The cut-off date with respect to each mortgage loan is the respective due date for the monthly debt service payment that is due in February 2018 (or, in the case of any mortgage loan that has its first due date after February 2018, the date that would have been its due date in February 2018 under the terms of that mortgage loan if a monthly debt service payment were scheduled to be due in that month). |
Closing Date | On or about February 27, 2018. |
Distribution Date | The 4th business day following each determination date. The first distribution date will be in March 2018. |
Determination Date | The 11th day of each month or, if the 11th day is not a business day, then the business day immediately following such 11th day. |
Record Date | With respect to any distribution date, the last business day of the month preceding the month in which that distribution date occurs. |
Business Day | Under the pooling and servicing agreement, a business day will be any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in California, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Kansas, Pennsylvania, or any of the jurisdictions in which the respective primary servicing offices of the master servicer or the special servicer or the corporate trust offices of either the certificate administrator or the trustee are located, or the New York Stock Exchange or the Federal Reserve System of the United States of America, are authorized or obligated by law or executive order to remain closed. |
Interest Accrual Period | The interest accrual period for each class of offered certificates for each distribution date will be the calendar month immediately preceding the month in which that distribution date occurs. Interest on the offered certificates will be calculated assuming that each month has 30 days and each year has 360 days. |
Collection Period | For any mortgage loan to be held by the issuing entity and any distribution date, the collection period will be the period beginning with the day after the determination date in the month preceding the month in which such distribution date occurs (or, in the case of |
34
the first distribution date, commencing immediately following the cut-off date) and ending with the determination date occurring in the month in which such distribution date occurs. |
Assumed Final |
Distribution Date; Rated |
Final Distribution Date | The assumed final distribution dates set forth below for each class have been determined on the basis of the assumptions described in “Description of the Certificates—Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date”: |
Class | Assumed Final Distribution Date | ||
Class A-1 | September 2022 | ||
Class A-2 | February 2023 | ||
Class A-SB | May 2027 | ||
Class A-3 | January 2028 | ||
Class A-4 | February 2028 | ||
Class X-A | NAP | ||
Class X-B | NAP | ||
Class A-S | February 2028 | ||
Class B | February 2028 | ||
Class C | February 2028 |
The rated final distribution date will be the distribution date in February 2051. |
Transaction Overview
On the closing date, each sponsor will sell its respective mortgage loans to the depositor, which will in turn deposit the mortgage loans into the issuing entity, a common law trust created on the closing date. The issuing entity will be formed by a pooling and servicing agreement to be entered into among the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer. |
35
The transfers of the mortgage loans from the sponsors to the depositor and from the depositor to the issuing entity in exchange for the offered certificates are illustrated below: |
Offered Certificates
General | We are offering the following classes of commercial mortgage pass-through certificates as part of Series 2018-C8: |
● | Class A-1 |
● | Class A-2 |
● | Class A-SB |
● | Class A-3 |
● | Class A-4 |
● | Class X-A |
● | Class X-B |
● | Class A-S |
● | Class B |
● | Class C |
The certificates of this Series will consist of the above classes and the following classes that are not being offered by this prospectus: Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR, Class Z and Class R. |
36
Certificate Balances and |
Notional Amounts | Your certificates will have the approximate aggregate initial certificate balance or notional amount set forth below, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%: |
Class | Approx. Initial Aggregate Certificate Balance or Notional Amount | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | Approx.
| ||||||||
Class A-1 | $ | 23,231,000 | 2.223 | % | 30.000 | % | |||||
Class A-2 | $ | 68,276,000 | 6.533 | % | 30.000 | % | |||||
Class A-SB | $ | 35,465,000 | 3.393 | % | 30.000 | % | |||||
Class A-3 | $ | 284,000,000 | 27.173 | % | 30.000 | % | |||||
Class A-4 | $ | 320,645,000 | 30.679 | % | 30.000 | % | |||||
Class X-A | $ | 731,617,000 | NAP | NAP | |||||||
Class X-B | $ | 185,517,000 | NAP | NAP | |||||||
Class A-S | $ | 84,920,000 | 8.125 | % | 21.875 | % | |||||
Class B | $ | 54,871,000 | 5.250 | % | 16.625 | % | |||||
Class C | $ | 45,726,000 | 4.375 | % | 12.250 | % |
(1) | The approximate initial credit support with respect to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates represents the approximate credit enhancement for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates in the aggregate. |
Pass-Through Rates |
A. Offered Certificates | Your certificates will accrue interest at an annual rate called a pass-through rate. The initial approximate pass-through rate is set forth below for each class of certificates: |
Class | Approx.
Initial | ||
Class A-1 | 2.6590% | ||
Class A-2 | 3.7130% | ||
Class A-SB | 3.9030% | ||
Class A-3 | 3.7200% | ||
Class A-4 | 3.9830% | ||
Class X-A | 0.8955% | ||
Class X-B | 0.2653% | ||
Class A-S | 4.2150% | ||
Class B | 4.5670% | ||
Class C | 4.7053% |
(1) | The pass-through rates for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates will, in each case, be a per annum rate equal to a fixed rate set forth opposite such class in the table. The pass-through rate for the Class X-A certificates for any distribution date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date, over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through rates on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates for the related distribution date, weighted on the basis of their respective aggregate certificate balances outstanding immediately prior to that distribution date. The pass-through rate for the Class X-B certificates for any distribution date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date, over (b) the weighted average of the pass-through |
37
rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for the related distribution date, weighted on the basis of their respective aggregate certificate balances outstanding immediately prior to that distribution date. The pass-through rates for the Class A-S and Class B certificates for any distribution date will, in each case, be a variable rate per annum equal to the lesser of (i) a fixed rate per annum equal to the pass-through rate set forth opposite such class in the table and (ii) the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date. The pass-through rate for the Class C certificates for any distribution date will be a variable rate per annum equal to the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for the related distribution date. For purposes of the calculation of the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, the mortgage interest rates will be adjusted as necessary to a 30/360 basis. |
B. Interest Rate |
Calculation Convention | Interest on the offered certificates at their applicable pass-through rates will be calculated based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, or a “30/360 basis”. |
For purposes of calculating the pass-through rates on the Class X-A and Class X-B certificates and any other class of certificates that has a pass-through rate limited by, equal to or based on the weighted average net mortgage interest rate (which calculation does not include any companion loan interest rate), the mortgage loan interest rates will not reflect any default interest rate, any loan term modifications agreed to by the special servicer or any modifications resulting from a borrower’s bankruptcy or insolvency. |
For purposes of calculating the pass-through rates on the offered certificates, the interest rate for each mortgage loan that accrues interest based on the actual number of days in each month and assuming a 360-day year, or an “actual/360 basis”, will be recalculated, if necessary, so that the amount of interest that would accrue at that recalculated rate in the applicable month, calculated on a 30/360 basis, will equal the amount of interest that is required to be paid on that mortgage loan in that month, subject to certain adjustments as described in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Pass-Through Rates” and “—Interest Distribution Amount”. |
C. Servicing and |
Administration Fees | Each of the master servicer and the special servicer is entitled to a servicing fee or special servicing fee, as the case may be, from the interest payments on each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan with respect to the special servicing fee only), any related serviced companion loan and any related REO loans and, with respect to the special servicing fees, if the related mortgage loan interest payments (or other |
38
collections in respect of the related mortgage loan or mortgaged property) are insufficient, then from general collections on all mortgage loans. |
The servicing fee for each distribution date, including the master servicing fee and the portion of the servicing fee payable to any primary servicer or subservicer, is calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related serviced companion loan at the servicing fee rate equal to a per annum rate ranging from 0.00250% to 0.07125%. |
The special servicing fee for each distribution date is calculated based on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related serviced companion loan as to which a special servicing transfer event has occurred (including any REO loans), on a loan-by-loan basis at the special servicing fee rate equal to the greater of 0.25000% per annum and the rate that would result in a special servicing fee of $3,500 for the related month. The special servicer will not be entitled to a special servicing fee with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan. |
Any primary servicing fees or sub-servicing fees with respect to each mortgage loan and any related serviced companion loan will be paid out of the servicing fees and special servicing fees, as applicable, described above. |
The master servicer and the special servicer are also entitled to additional fees and amounts, including income on the amounts held in certain accounts and certain permitted investments, liquidation fees and workout fees. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”. |
The certificate administrator fee for each distribution date is calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and REO loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan, but not any companion loan) at a per annum rate equal to 0.0067%. The trustee fee is payable by the certificate administrator from the certificate administrator fee. |
The operating advisor will be entitled to a fee on each distribution date calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and REO loan at a per annum rate equal to 0.00137% with respect to each mortgage loan. |
39
The asset representations reviewer will be entitled to an upfront fee of $5,000 on the closing date. As compensation for the performance of its routine duties, the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to a fee on each distribution date calculated on the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and REO loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan, but excluding any related companion loan(s)) at a per annum rate equal to 0.00048%. Upon the completion of any asset review with respect to each delinquent loan, the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to a per loan fee in an amount described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation”. |
Each party to the pooling and servicing agreement will also be entitled to be reimbursed by the issuing entity for costs, expenses and liabilities borne by them in certain circumstances. Fees and expenses payable by the issuing entity to any party to the pooling and servicing agreement are generally payable prior to any distributions to certificateholders. |
Additionally, with respect to each distribution date, an amount equal to the product of 0.00050% per annum multiplied by the outstanding principal amount of each mortgage loan and any REO loan will be payable to CRE Finance Council® as a license fee for use of its name and trademarks, including an investor reporting package. This fee will be payable prior to any distributions to certificateholders. |
Payment of the fees and reimbursement of the costs and expenses described above will generally have priority over the distribution of amounts payable to the certificateholders. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses” and “—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”. |
With respect to each non-serviced mortgage loan set forth in the table below, the master servicer under the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of that mortgage loan will be entitled to a primary servicing fee at a rate equal to a per annum rate set forth in the table below, and the special servicer under the related pooling and servicing agreement will be entitled to a special servicing fee at a rate equal to the per annum rate set forth below. In addition, each party to the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan will be entitled to receive other fees and reimbursements with respect to such non-serviced mortgage loan in amounts, |
40
from sources, and at frequencies, that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to those described above and, in certain cases (for example, with respect to unreimbursed special servicing fees and servicing advances with respect to such non-serviced whole loan), such amounts will be reimbursable from general collections on the mortgage loans to the extent not recoverable from such non-serviced whole loan and to the extent allocable to such non-serviced mortgage loan pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
NON-SERVICED MORTGAGE LOANS(1) |
Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan | Primary Servicing Fee Rate(2) | Special Servicing Fee Rate | |||
AFIN Portfolio | 0.00125% | (3) | |||
BlueLinx Portfolio | 0.00125% | 0.25000% | |||
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 0.00250% | (3) |
(1) | Does not reflect the CrossPoint mortgage loan or the City Square and Clay Street mortgage loan, each of which is part of a split loan structure comprised of the related mortgage loan and one or more pari passu companion loans that may be included in one or more future securitizations. After the securitization of the related controlling pari passu companion loan, the related mortgage loan will also be a non-serviced mortgage loan, and the related servicing shift master servicer and related servicing shift special servicer will be entitled to a primary servicing fee and special servicing fee, respectively, as will be set forth in the related servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement. |
(2) | Included as part of the servicing fee rate. |
(3) | The special servicing fee rate is the greater of (i) 0.2500% per annum or (ii) the rate that would result in a special servicing fee of $3,500 per month. |
Distributions |
A. Amount and Order of |
Distributions | On each distribution date, funds available for distribution from the mortgage loans, net of (i) specified expenses of the issuing entity, including fees payable to, and costs and expenses reimbursable to, the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer, (ii) any yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums and (iii) any excess interest distributable to the Class Z certificates will be |
41
distributed in the following amounts and order of priority: |
First, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class X-A and Class X-B certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata in accordance with, the interest entitlements for those classes; |
Second, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates as follows: (i) to the extent of funds allocated to principal and available for distribution: (a) first, to principal on the Class A-SB certificates, until the certificate balance of the Class A-SB certificates is reduced to the planned principal balance for the related distribution date set forth in Annex E, (b) second, to principal on the Class A-1 certificates, until the certificate balance of the Class A-1 certificates has been reduced to zero, (c) third, to principal on the Class A-2 certificates, until the certificate balance of the Class A-2 certificates has been reduced to zero, (d) fourth, to principal on the Class A-3 certificates, until the certificate balance of the Class A-3 certificates has been reduced to zero, (e) fifth, to principal on the Class A-4 certificates, until the certificate balance of the Class A-4 certificates has been reduced to zero and (f) sixth, to principal on the Class A-SB certificates, until the certificate balance of the Class A-SB certificates has been reduced to zero, or (ii) if the certificate balance of each class of certificates other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates has been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of mortgage loan losses to those certificates, funds available for distributions of principal will be distributed to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, pro rata, without regard to the distribution priorities described above or the planned principal balance of the Class A-SB certificates; |
Third, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, to reimburse the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, pro rata, based upon the aggregate unreimbursed losses previously allocated to each such class, for any previously unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans allocable to principal that were previously borne by those classes, together with interest on that amount at the pass-through rate for such classes; |
Fourth, to the Class A-S certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class A-S certificates in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds allocable |
42
to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (as set forth in prior enumerated clauses set forth above), to principal on the Class A-S certificates until its certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class A-S certificates for any previously unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to those certificates, together with interest on that amount at the pass-through rate for such class; |
Fifth, to the Class B certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class B certificates in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds allocable to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (as set forth in prior enumerated clauses set forth above), to principal on the Class B certificates until its certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class B certificates for any previously unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to those certificates, together with interest on that amount at the pass-through rate for such class; |
Sixth, to the Class C certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class C certificates in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds allocable to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (as set forth in prior enumerated clauses set forth above), to principal on the Class C certificates until its certificate balance has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class C certificates for any previously unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to those certificates, together with interest on that amount at the pass-through rate for such class; |
Seventh, to the non-offered certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) in the amounts and order of priority described in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”; and |
Eighth, to the Class R certificates, any remaining amounts. |
For more detailed information regarding distributions on the certificates, see “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”. |
B. Interest and Principal |
Entitlements | A description of the interest entitlement of each class of certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) can be found in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Interest Distribution |
43
Amount”. As described in that section, there are circumstances in which your interest entitlement for a distribution date could be less than one full month’s interest at the pass-through rate on your certificate’s balance or notional amount. |
A description of the amount of principal required to be distributed to each class of certificates entitled to principal on a particular distribution date can be found in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Principal Distribution Amount”. |
C. Yield Maintenance |
Charges, Prepayment |
Premiums | Yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums with respect to the mortgage loans will be allocated to the certificates as described in “Description of the Certificates—Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums”. |
For an explanation of the calculation of yield maintenance charges, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans”. |
D. Subordination, |
Allocation of Losses |
and Certain Expenses | The chart below describes the manner in which the payment rights of certain classes of certificates will be senior or subordinate, as the case may be, to the payment rights of other classes of certificates. The chart shows the entitlement to receive principal and/or interest of certain classes of certificates (other than excess interest that accrues on each mortgage loan that has an anticipated repayment date) on any distribution date in descending order. It also shows the manner in which mortgage loan losses are allocated to certain classes of the certificates in ascending order (beginning with the non-offered certificates, other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) to reduce the certificate balance of each such class to zero; provided that no principal payments or mortgage loan losses will be allocated to the Class X-A, Class X-B, Class Z or Class R certificates, although principal payments and mortgage loan losses may reduce the notional amounts of the Class X-A and Class X-B certificates and, therefore, the amount of interest they accrue. |
44
![]() | |||
(1) | The Class X-A and Class X-B certificates are interest-only certificates. |
(2) | Other than the Class Z and Class R certificates. |
Other than the subordination of certain classes of certificates, as described above, no other form of credit enhancement will be available for the benefit of the holders of the offered certificates. |
Principal losses and principal payments, if any, on mortgage loans that are allocated to a class of certificates (other than the Class X-A, Class X-B, Class Z or Class R certificates) will reduce the certificate balance of that class of certificates. |
The notional amount of the Class X-A certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal losses or principal payments, if any, allocated to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates. The notional amount of the Class X-B certificates will be reduced by the aggregate amount of principal losses or principal payments, if any, allocated to the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates. |
To the extent funds are available on a subsequent distribution date for distribution on your offered certificates, you will be reimbursed for any losses allocated to your offered certificates with interest at the pass-through rate on those offered certificates in accordance with the distribution priorities. |
See “Description of the Certificates—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses” for more detailed information regarding the subordination provisions applicable to the certificates and the allocation of losses to the certificates. |
E. Shortfalls in Available |
Funds | The following types of shortfalls in available funds will reduce distributions to the classes of certificates with the |
45
lowest payment priorities. Shortfalls may occur as a result of: |
● | the payment of special servicing fees and other additional compensation that the special servicer is entitled to receive; |
● | interest on advances made by the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee (to the extent not covered by late payment charges or default interest paid by the related borrower); |
● | the application of appraisal reductions to reduce interest advances; |
● | extraordinary expenses of the issuing entity including indemnification payments payable to the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement; |
● | a modification of a mortgage loan’s interest rate or principal balance; and |
● | other unanticipated or default-related expenses of the issuing entity. |
In addition, prepayment interest shortfalls on the mortgage loans that are not covered by certain compensating interest payments made by the master servicer are required to be allocated among the classes of certificates (other than the Class Z certificates) entitled to interest, on a pro rata basis, to reduce the amount of interest payable on each such class of certificates to the extent described in this prospectus. See “Description of the Certificates—Prepayment Interest Shortfalls”. |
F. Excess Interest | On each distribution date, any excess interest in respect of the increase in the interest rate on any mortgage loan with an anticipated repayment date after the related anticipated repayment date to the extent actually collected and applied as interest during a collection period will be distributed to the holders of the Class Z certificates on the related distribution date as set forth in “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Excess Interest”. This excess interest will not be available to make distributions to any other class of certificates or to provide credit support for other classes of certificates or offset any interest shortfalls or to pay any other amounts to any other party under the pooling and servicing agreement. |
46
Advances |
A. P&I Advances | The master servicer is required to advance a delinquent periodic payment on each mortgage loan (including any non-serviced mortgage loan) or any REO loan (other than any portion of an REO loan related to a companion loan), unless in each case, the master servicer or the special servicer determines that the advance would be non-recoverable. Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be required to advance balloon payments due at maturity or on an anticipated repayment date (as applicable) in excess of the regular periodic payment, interest in excess of a mortgage loan’s regular interest rate, default interest, late payment charges, prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges. |
The amount of the interest portion of any advance will be subject to reduction to the extent that an appraisal reduction of the related mortgage loan has occurred (and with respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a whole loan, to the extent such appraisal reduction amount is allocated to the related mortgage loan). There may be other circumstances in which the master servicer will not be required to advance a full month of principal and/or interest. If the master servicer fails to make a required advance, the trustee will be required to make the advance, unless the trustee determines that the advance would be non-recoverable. If an interest advance is made by the master servicer, the master servicer will not advance the portion of interest that constitutes its servicing fee, but will advance the portion of interest that constitutes the monthly fees payable to the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer and the CREFC® license fee. |
None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will make, or be permitted to make, any principal or interest advance with respect to any companion loan. |
See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. |
B. Property Protection |
Advances | The master servicer may be required to make advances with respect to the mortgage loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan) and any related companion loan to pay delinquent real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums and similar expenses necessary to: |
● | protect and maintain (and in the case of REO properties, lease and manage) the related mortgaged property; |
47
● | maintain the lien on the related mortgaged property; and/or |
● | enforce the related mortgage loan documents. |
The special servicer will have no obligation to make any property protection advances (although it may elect to make them in an emergency circumstance in its sole discretion). If the special servicer makes a property protection advance, the master servicer will be required to reimburse the special servicer for that advance (unless the master servicer determines that the advance would be non-recoverable, in which case the advance will be reimbursed out of the collection account) and the master servicer will be deemed to have made that advance as of the date made by the special servicer. |
If the master servicer fails to make a required advance of this type, the trustee will be required to make this advance. None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee is required to advance amounts determined by such party to be non-recoverable. |
See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. |
With respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, the master servicer (and the trustee, as applicable) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of that non-serviced whole loan will be required to make similar advances with respect to delinquent real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums as described above. |
C. Interest on Advances | The master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to interest on the above described advances at the “prime rate” as published in The Wall Street Journal, as described in this prospectus. Interest accrued on outstanding advances may result in reductions in amounts otherwise payable on the certificates. Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be entitled to interest on advances made with respect to principal and interest due on a mortgage loan until the related due date has passed and any grace period for late payments applicable to the mortgage loan has expired. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. |
With respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, the applicable makers of advances under the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the non-serviced whole loan will similarly be entitled to interest on advances, and any accrued and unpaid interest on property protection advances made in respect of such non-serviced mortgage loan may be |
48
reimbursed from general collections on the other mortgage loans included in the issuing entity to the extent not recoverable from such non-serviced whole loan and to the extent allocable to such non-serviced mortgage loan in accordance with the related intercreditor agreement. |
The Mortgage Pool |
The Mortgage Pool | The issuing entity’s primary assets will be sixty-seven (67) fixed rate commercial mortgage loans, each evidenced by one or more promissory notes secured by first mortgages, deeds of trust, deeds to secure debt or similar security instruments on the fee and/or leasehold estate of the related borrower in one hundred and twenty-six (126) commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community properties. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—General”. |
The aggregate principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date will be approximately $1,045,167,892. |
Whole Loans |
Unless otherwise expressly stated in this prospectus, the term “mortgage loan” refers to each of the sixty-seven (67) commercial mortgage loans to be held by the issuing entity. Of the mortgage loans, each mortgage loan in the table below is part of a larger whole loan, which is comprised of the related mortgage loan and one or more loans that are pari passu in right of payment to the related mortgage loan and evidenced by separate promissory notes (each referred to in this prospectus as a “pari passu companion loan”) and/or, in certain cases, one or more loans that are subordinate in right of payment to the related mortgage loan (each referred to in this prospectus as a “subordinate companion loan”, and any pari passu companion loan or subordinate companion loan may also be referred to herein as a “companion loan”). The companion loans, together with their related mortgage loan, are referred to in this prospectus as a “whole loan”. |
49
Whole Loan Summary |
Mortgage Loan Name |
Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance |
% of Initial Pool Balance |
Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance |
Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance |
Mortgage |
Whole |
Mortgage Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(1) |
Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(3) |
AFIN Portfolio | $60,000,000 | 5.7% | $150,000,000 | N/A | 56.5% | 56.5% | 2.34x | 2.34x |
Tryad Industrial & Business Center | $56,440,256 | 5.4% | $53,942,899 | N/A | 52.6% | 52.6% | 1.42x | 1.42x |
CrossPoint | $50,000,000 | 4.8% | $100,000,000 | N/A | 60.0% | 60.0% | 2.24x | 2.24x |
Houston Distribution Center | $49,000,000 | 4.7% | $35,000,000 | N/A | 58.3% | 58.3% | 1.44x | 1.44x |
Park Place at Florham Park | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $17,500,000 | N/A | 65.1% | 65.1% | 1.80x | 1.80x |
City Square and Clay Street | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $45,000,000 | N/A | 49.7% | 49.7% | 1.76x | 1.76x |
BlueLinx Portfolio | $28,600,000 | 2.7% | $42,900,000 | N/A | 64.2% | 64.2% | 2.46x | 2.46x |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | $15,000,000 | 1.4% | $185,000,000 | $200,000,000 | 22.5% | 44.9% | 4.28x | 1.68x |
(1) | Calculated including any related pari passu companion loans but excluding any related subordinate companion loan and any mezzanine debt. |
(2) | With respect to those mortgage loans identified under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”, the indicated loan-to-value ratio has been based on an other than “as-is” appraised value. |
(3) | Calculated including any related pari passu companion loans and any related subordinate companion loan but excluding any mezzanine debt |
Each of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center whole loan, the Park Place at Florham Park whole loan and the Houston Distribution Center whole loan will be serviced by Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer and as special servicer, pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction and is referred to in this prospectus as a “serviced whole loan”, and each related companion loan is referred to in this prospectus as a “serviced companion loan”. |
For further information regarding the whole loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. |
The CrossPoint whole loan and the City Square and Clay Street whole loan (collectively, the “servicing shift whole loans” and the related mortgage loans, the “servicing shift mortgage loans”) will initially be serviced by the master servicer and the special servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction. From and after the date on which the related controlling companion loan is securitized (the “servicing shift securitization date”), it is anticipated that each servicing shift whole loan will be serviced under, and by the master servicer (a “servicing shift master servicer”) and the special servicer (a “servicing shift special servicer”) designated in, the related pooling and servicing agreement entered into in connection with such securitization (a “servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement”). In each case, prior to the related servicing shift securitization date, the servicing shift whole loans will be “serviced whole loans”, the related mortgage loans will be “serviced mortgage loans” and the related companion loans will be “serviced companion loans”. In each case, on and after the related servicing |
50
shift securitization date, the servicing shift whole loans will be “non-serviced whole loans”, the related mortgage loans will be “non-serviced mortgage loans” and the related companion loans will be “non-serviced companion loans”. |
Each whole loan identified in the table below will not be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction and instead will be serviced under a separate pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement identified below entered into in connection with the securitization of one or more related companion loan(s) and is referred to in this prospectus as a “non-serviced whole loan”. The related mortgage loan is referred to as a “non-serviced mortgage loan” and the related companion loans are each referred to in this prospectus as a “non-serviced companion loan” or collectively, as the “non-serviced companion loans”. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
Non-Serviced Whole Loans(1)(2)
Loan Name |
Transaction/Trust Agreement |
% of Initial Pool Balance |
Master Servicer |
Special Servicer |
Trustee |
AFIN Portfolio | UBS 2017-C7(3) | 5.7% | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | KeyBank National Association | Wilmington Trust, National Association |
BlueLinx Portfolio | BMARK 2018-B2 | 2.7% | KeyBank National Association | CWCapital Asset Management LLC | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | CSAIL 2017-CX10 | 1.4% | KeyBank National Association | CWCapital Asset Management LLC | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
Loan Name |
Certificate Administrator |
Custodian |
Operating Advisor |
Initial Directing Certificateholder |
AFIN Portfolio | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Pentalpha Surveillance LLC | Prime Finance CMBS B-Piece Holdco XV, LP |
BlueLinx Portfolio | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Pentalpha Surveillance LLC | Barings LLC |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Park Bridge Lender Services LLC | Eightfold Real Estate Capital Fund V, L.P. |
(1) | Information in this table is presented as of the closing date of the related securitization. |
(2) | This table does not include information related to the servicing shift whole loans. |
(3) | After the securitization of the related controlling pari passu companion loan, the related whole loan will be serviced under the related pooling and servicing agreement for that securitization transaction (and by the service provider parties thereto). |
For further information regarding the whole loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”, and for information regarding the servicing of the non-serviced whole loans, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. |
51
Mortgage Loan Characteristics |
The following tables set forth certain anticipated characteristics of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (unless otherwise indicated). Except as specifically provided in this prospectus, various information presented in this prospectus (including loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, debt yields and cut-off date balances per net rentable square foot, pad, room or unit, as applicable) with respect to any mortgage loan with a pari passu companion loan or subordinate companion loan is calculated including the principal balance and debt service payment of the related pari passu companion loan(s), but is calculated excluding the principal balance and debt service payment of the related subordinate companion loan (or any other subordinate debt encumbering the related mortgaged property or any related mezzanine debt or preferred equity). Unless specifically indicated, no subordinate companion loans are included in the presentation of numerical and statistical information with respect to the composition of the mortgage pool contained in this prospectus (including any tables, charts and information set forth on Annex A-1 and Annex A-2). |
The sum of the numerical data in any column may not equal the indicated total due to rounding. Unless otherwise indicated, all figures and percentages presented in this “Summary of Terms” are calculated as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” and, unless otherwise indicated, such figures and percentages are approximate and in each case, represent the indicated figure or percentage of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date. The principal balance of each mortgage loan as of the cut-off date assumes (or, in the case of each mortgage loan with a cut-off date prior to the date of this prospectus, reflects) the timely receipt of principal scheduled to be paid on or before the cut-off date and no defaults, delinquencies or prepayments on, or modifications of, any mortgage loan on or prior to the cut-off date. Whenever percentages and other information in this prospectus are presented on the mortgaged property level rather than the mortgage loan level, the information for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property is based on allocated loan amounts as stated in Annex A-1. |
52
The mortgage loans will have the following approximate characteristics as of the cut-off date: |
Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Characteristics |
All Mortgage Loans | ||
Initial Pool Balance(1) | $1,045,167,892 | |
Number of mortgage loans | 67 | |
Number of mortgaged properties | 126 | |
Range of Cut-off Date Balances | $896,000 to $60,000,000 | |
Average Cut-off Date Balance | $15,599,521 | |
Range of Mortgage Rates | 2.740% to 6.160% | |
Weighted average Mortgage Rate | 4.724% | |
Range of original terms to maturity or ARD(2) | 60 months to 120 months | |
Weighted average original term to maturity or ARD(2) | 116 months | |
Range
of remaining terms to maturity or ARD(2) |
56 months to 120 months | |
Weighted average remaining term to maturity or ARD(2) | 115 months | |
Range of original amortization terms(3) | 300 months to 360 months | |
Weighted average original amortization term(3) | 356 months | |
Range of remaining amortization terms(3) | 300 months to 360 months | |
Weighted average remaining amortization term(3) | 356 months | |
Range of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(4)(5) | 22.5% to 75.0% | |
Weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(4)(5) | 59.5% | |
Range of LTV Ratios as of the maturity date or ARD(2)(4)(5) | 22.5% to 70.0% | |
Weighted average LTV Ratio as of the maturity date or ARD(2)(4)(5) | 55.4% | |
Range of U/W NCF DSCRs(4)(6) | 1.25x to 4.28x | |
Weighted average U/W NCF DSCR(4)(6) | 1.92x | |
Range of U/W NOI Debt Yields(4) | 7.0% to 16.2% | |
Weighted average U/W NOI Debt Yield(4) | 10.8% | |
Percentage of Initial Pool Balance consisting of: | ||
Full IO | 56.8% | |
Amortizing | 23.7% | |
Partial IO | 19.2% | |
Full IO, ARD | 0.3% |
(1) | Subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%. |
(2) | With respect to any mortgage loan with an anticipated repayment date, calculated through or as of, as applicable, such anticipated repayment date. |
(3) | Excludes thirty-one (31) mortgage loans secured by the mortgaged properties or portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, CrossPoint, Moore Plaza, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, University Properties Portfolio, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio, Residence Inn Irvine, GNL Industrial Portfolio, BlueLinx Portfolio, El Dorado Tech Center, 1990 NASA Boulevard, Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion, Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, Concord Place, Fortuna Center Plaza, Firehouse Self Storage, Tarzana Village, A Storage Place - Evergreen, Las Brisas MHC, Storage Direct Roseville, Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio, East Sac Self Storage, Canyon Gate Self Storage, 645-679 Manor Drive, Walgreens – Harlingen, TX, Walgreens – Dallas, |
53
GA, Walgreens – Guthrie, OK, Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, representing approximately 57.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, that are interest only for the entire term or until the anticipated repayment date, as applicable. |
(4) | In the case of eight (8) mortgage loans secured by the mortgaged properties or portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, Tryad Industrial & Business Center, CrossPoint, Houston Distribution Center, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, BlueLinx Portfolio and Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 33.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, each of which has one or more pari passu companion loans and/or subordinate companion loans that are not included in the issuing entity, the debt service coverage ratio, loan-to-value ratio and debt yield have been calculated including the related pari passu companion loan(s) but excluding any related subordinate companion loan. With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the related loan-to-value ratio as of the cut-off date and underwritten net cash flow debt service coverage ratio calculated including the related subordinate companion loan are 44.9% and 1.68x, respectively. |
(5) | Unless otherwise indicated under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”, the cut-off date loan-to-value ratio and maturity date loan-to-value ratio have been calculated using the “as-is” appraised value. |
(6) | Debt service coverage ratios are calculated using the average of the principal and interest payments for the first twelve payment periods of the mortgage loan following the cut-off date, provided that (i) in the case of a mortgage loan that provides for interest-only payments through maturity or its anticipated repayment date, as applicable, such items are calculated based on the interest payments scheduled to be due on the first due date following the cut-off date and the 11 due dates thereafter for such mortgage loan and (ii) in the case of a mortgage loan that provides for an initial interest-only period that ends prior to maturity or its anticipated repayment date, as applicable, and provides for scheduled amortization payments thereafter, such items are calculated based on the monthly payment of principal and interest payable for the 12 payment periods immediately following the expiration of the interest-only period. |
All of the mortgage loans accrue interest on an actual/360 basis. |
For further information regarding the mortgage loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool”. |
Modified and Refinanced |
Loans | As of the cut-off date, other than as described below, none of the mortgage loans were modified due to a delinquency or were refinancings of loans in default at the time of refinancing and/or otherwise involved discounted pay-offs in connection with the origination of such mortgage loans. |
With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (by allocated loan amount), the prior loan that encumbered the mortgaged properties, which were a part of a larger portfolio of properties, was transferred to special servicing and later modified. The single-tenant of each mortgaged property experienced financial difficulties around 2008 and in |
54
2011 the loan was transferred to special servicing for imminent default. Subsequently, such prior loan was modified to, among other things, extend the maturity date. The borrowers acquired the mortgaged properties in January 2018 and the proceeds of the acquisition were used to pay off the previous loan in full. |
With respect to one mortgaged loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as South Bend Medical Office, representing approximately 1.5% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (by allocated loan amount), such mortgaged property, the borrower sponsor acquired the South Bend Medical Office properties out of foreclosure in 2018 with proceeds of the related mortgage loan. The two South Bend Medical Office properties, previously owned by a party unaffiliated with the current borrowers, were part of a CMBS loan originated in October 2006 secured by a portfolio of seven mortgaged properties. The previous loan was transferred to special servicing on May 2, 2016 due to imminent default and entered maturity default on October 8, 2016, when the prior owner of the mortgaged properties was unable to obtain refinancing. The borrower sponsor did not acquire the other five properties that secured the defaulted CMBS loan. Under the previous loan, the two South Bend Medical Office properties had an aggregate allocated loan amount of approximately $16.8 million and the purchase price for the two South Bend Medical Office properties was approximately $17.8 million. |
With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A-1 as 100 Fairfield, representing approximately 0.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the mortgaged property was previously encumbered by a prior loan that went into maturity default in November 2017. The mortgage loan paid off such prior loan in full. |
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings”. |
Loans with Limited |
Operating History | With respect to fifty-four (54) of the mortgaged properties or portfolio of mortgaged properties securing eighteen (18) mortgage loans representing approximately 23.5% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (by allocated loan amount), such mortgaged properties (i) were constructed or the subject of a major renovation that was completed within 12 calendar months prior to the cut-off date and, therefore, the |
55
related mortgaged property has no or limited prior operating history, (ii) have a borrower or an affiliate under the related mortgage loan that acquired the related mortgaged property within 12 calendar months prior to the related cut-off date and such borrower or affiliate was unable to provide the related mortgage loan seller with historical financial information (or provided limited historical financial information) for such acquired mortgaged property or (iii) are subject to triple-net leases with a related tenant where the related borrower did not provide the related mortgage loan seller with historical financial information for the related mortgaged property. |
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Mortgaged Properties With Limited Prior Operating History”. |
Certain Variances from |
Underwriting Standards | Each sponsor maintains its own set of underwriting guidelines, which typically relate to credit and collateral analysis, loan approval, debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio analysis, assessment of property condition, escrow requirements and requirements regarding title insurance policy and property insurance. Certain of the mortgage loans may vary from the related mortgage loan seller’s underwriting guidelines described under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines”; “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—UBS AG, New York Branch—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; “—Société Générale—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis”; “—CIBC Inc.—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; and “—Barclays Bank PLC—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”. |
Additional Aspects of Certificates |
Denominations | The offered certificates with certificate balances that are initially offered and sold to purchasers will be issued in minimum denominations of $10,000 and integral multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The offered certificates with notional amounts will be issued, maintained and transferred only in minimum |
56
denominations of authorized initial notional amounts of not less than $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000. |
Registration, Clearance |
and Settlement | Each class of offered certificates will initially be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or DTC. |
You may hold offered certificates through: (1) DTC in the United States; or (2) Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System. Transfers within DTC, Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, will be made in accordance with the usual rules and operating procedures of those systems. |
We may elect to terminate the book-entry system through DTC (with the consent of the DTC participants), Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, with respect to all or any portion of any class of the offered certificates. |
See “Description of the Certificates—Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination—Book-Entry Registration”. |
Credit Risk Retention | For a discussion of the manner in which the U.S. credit risk retention requirements will be satisfied by UBS AG, New York Branch, as retaining sponsor, see “Credit Risk Retention”. |
None of the sponsors, the depositor or the issuing entity intends to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization constituted by the issue of the offered certificates in accordance with the EU risk retention and due diligence requirements or to take any other action which may be required by EEA-regulated investors for the purposes of compliance with the EU risk retention and due diligence requirements or similar requirements. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates”. |
Information Available to |
Certificateholders | On each distribution date, the certificate administrator will prepare and make available to each certificateholder of record, initially expected to be Cede & Co., a statement as to the distributions being made on that date. Additionally, under certain circumstances, certificateholders of record may be entitled to certain other information regarding the issuing entity. See |
57
“Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. |
Deal Information/Analytics | Certain information concerning the mortgage loans and the certificates may be available to subscribers through the following services: |
● | Bloomberg, L.P., Trepp, LLC, Intex Solutions, Inc., BlackRock Financial Management Inc., Interactive Data Corporation, CMBS.com, Inc., Markit, Moody’s Analytics, RealINSIGHT and Thomson Reuters Corporation; |
● | the certificate administrator’s website initially located at www.ctslink.com; and |
● | the master servicer’s website initially located at www.pnc.com/midland. |
Optional Termination | On any distribution date on which the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans is less than 1.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, certain entities specified in this prospectus will have the option to purchase all of the remaining mortgage loans (and all property acquired through exercise of remedies in respect of any mortgage loan) at the price specified in this prospectus. |
The issuing entity may also be terminated in connection with a voluntary exchange of all of the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) for the mortgage loans then held by the issuing entity, provided that (i) the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates are no longer outstanding, (ii) there is only one holder (or multiple holders acting unanimously) of the outstanding certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) and (iii) the master servicer consents to the exchange. |
See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”. |
Required Repurchases or |
Substitutions of Mortgage |
Loans; Loss of Value |
Payment | Under certain circumstances, the related mortgage loan seller may be obligated to (i) repurchase (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium) or substitute for an affected mortgage loan from the issuing entity or (ii) make a cash payment that would be deemed sufficient to compensate the issuing entity in the event of a |
58
document defect or a breach of a representation and warranty made by the related mortgage loan seller with respect to the mortgage loan in the related mortgage loan purchase agreement that materially and adversely affects the value of the mortgage loan, the value of the related mortgaged property or the interests of any certificateholders in the mortgage loan or mortgaged property or causes the mortgage loan to be other than a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (but without regard to the rule of Treasury regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective loan to be treated as a “qualified mortgage”). In addition, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP are to agree, pursuant to the related mortgage loan purchase agreement, to guarantee payment in connection with the performance of such obligations on the part of Ladder Capital Finance LLC. See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—General”. |
Sale of Defaulted Loans | Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, under certain circumstances the special servicer is required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for defaulted serviced mortgage loans (or a defaulted serviced whole loan and/or related REO properties) and, in the absence of a cash offer at least equal to its outstanding principal balance plus all accrued and unpaid interest and outstanding costs and expenses and certain other amounts under the pooling and servicing agreement, may accept the first (and, if multiple offers are received, the highest) cash offer from any person that constitutes a fair price for the defaulted serviced mortgage loan (or defaulted whole loan) or related REO property, determined as described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans” and “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties”, unless the special servicer determines, in accordance with the servicing standard (and subject to the requirements of any related intercreditor agreement), that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the certificateholders and any related companion loan holder (as a collective whole as if such certificateholders and such companion loan holder constituted a single lender). |
With respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, if a related pari passu companion loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan under the pooling and servicing agreement for the related pari passu companion loan and the special servicer under the related pooling and servicing agreement for the related pari passu |
59
companion loan(s) determines to sell such pari passu companion loan(s), then that special servicer will be required to sell such non-serviced mortgage loan together with the related pari passu companion loan(s) and any related subordinate companion loan(s) in a manner similar to that described above. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. |
With respect to any mortgage loan as to which equity interests in the related borrower directly or indirectly secure mezzanine debt, the mezzanine lender will generally have the option to purchase such mortgage loan under certain default scenarios. |
Tax Status | Elections will be made to treat designated portions of the issuing entity (exclusive of interest that is deferred after the anticipated repayment date of any mortgage loan with an anticipated repayment date and the excess interest distribution account) as two separate REMICs – the lower-tier REMIC and the upper-tier REMIC – for federal income tax purposes. In addition, the portion of the issuing entity consisting of the excess interest accrued on each mortgage loan with an anticipated repayment date, beneficial ownership of which is represented by the Class Z certificates, will be treated as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes. |
Pertinent federal income tax consequences of an investment in the offered certificates include: |
● | Each class of offered certificates will constitute REMIC “regular interests”. |
● | The offered certificates will be treated as newly originated debt instruments for federal income tax purposes. |
● | You will be required to report income on your offered certificates using the accrual method of accounting. |
● | It is anticipated that the Class X-A and Class X-B certificates will be issued with original issue discount, the Class C certificates will be issued with de minimis original issue discount and that the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-S and Class B certificates will be issued at a premium for federal income tax purposes. |
See “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations”. |
Certain ERISA |
Considerations | Subject to important considerations described under “Certain ERISA Considerations”, the offered certificates are eligible for purchase by persons investing assets of |
60
employee benefit plans or individual retirement accounts. |
Legal Investment | None of the certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended. |
If your investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities, then you may be subject to restrictions on investment in the certificates. You should consult your own legal advisors for assistance in determining the suitability of and consequences to you of the purchase, ownership, and sale of the certificates. |
The issuing entity will not be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act (both as defined in this prospectus). |
See “Legal Investment”. |
Ratings | The offered certificates will not be issued unless each of the offered classes receives a credit rating from one or more of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates. The decision not to engage one or more other rating agencies in the rating of certain classes of certificates to be issued in connection with this transaction, may negatively impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of those classes of certificates. Neither the depositor nor any other person or entity will have any duty to notify you if any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization issues, or delivers notice of its intention to issue, unsolicited ratings on one or more classes of certificates after the date of this prospectus. |
See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates |
61
Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded” and “Ratings”. |
62
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risks before making an investment decision. In particular, distributions on your certificates will depend on payments received on, and other recoveries with respect to the mortgage loans. Therefore, you should carefully consider the risk factors relating to the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties.
If any of the following events or circumstances identified as risks actually occur or materialize, your investment could be materially and adversely affected. We note that additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us may also impair your investment.
This prospectus also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this prospectus.
The Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You
The certificates will not be suitable investments for all investors. In particular, you should not purchase any class of certificates unless you understand and are able to bear the risk that the yield to maturity and the aggregate amount and timing of distributions on the certificates will be subject to material variability from period to period and give rise to the potential for significant loss over the life of the certificates. The interaction of the foregoing factors and their effects are impossible to predict and are likely to change from time to time. As a result, an investment in the certificates involves substantial risks and uncertainties and should be considered only by sophisticated institutional investors with substantial investment experience with similar types of securities and who have conducted appropriate due diligence on the mortgage loans, the mortgaged properties and the certificates.
Combination or “Layering” of Multiple Risks May Significantly Increase Risk of Loss
Although the various risks discussed in this prospectus are generally described separately, you should consider the potential effects of the interplay of multiple risk factors. Where more than one significant risk factor is present, the risk of loss to an investor in the certificates may be significantly increased.
Risks Related to Market Conditions and Other External Factors
The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Adversely Affected the Value of CMBS and Similar Factors May in the Future Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS
In recent years, the real estate and securitization markets, including the market for commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), experienced significant dislocations, illiquidity and volatility. We cannot assure you that another dislocation in CMBS will not occur.
Any economic downturn may adversely affect the financial resources of borrowers under commercial mortgage loans and may result in their inability to make payments on, or refinance, their outstanding mortgage debt when due or to sell their mortgaged properties
63
for an aggregate amount sufficient to pay off the outstanding debt when due. As a result, distributions of principal and interest on your certificates, and the value of your certificates, could be adversely affected.
Other Events May Affect the Value and Liquidity of Your Investment
Moreover, other types of events, domestic or international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets:
● | Wars, revolts, terrorist attacks, armed conflicts, energy supply or price disruptions, political crises, natural disasters and man-made disasters may have an adverse effect on the mortgaged properties and/or your certificates; and |
● | Trading activity associated with indices of CMBS may drive spreads on those indices wider than spreads on CMBS, thereby resulting in a decrease in value of such CMBS, including your certificates, and spreads on those indices may be affected by a variety of factors, and may or may not be affected for reasons involving the commercial and multifamily real estate markets and may be affected for reasons that are unknown and cannot be discerned. |
You should consider that the foregoing factors may adversely affect the performance of the mortgage loans and accordingly the performance of the offered certificates.
Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans
Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed
The mortgage loans are not insured or guaranteed by any person or entity, governmental or otherwise.
Investors should treat each mortgage loan as a non-recourse loan. If a default occurs on a non-recourse loan, recourse generally may be had only against the specific mortgaged properties and other assets that have been pledged to secure the mortgage loan. Consequently, payment prior to maturity is dependent primarily on the sufficiency of the net operating income of the mortgaged property. Payment at maturity or on an anticipated repayment date is primarily dependent upon the market value of the mortgaged property or the borrower’s ability to refinance or sell the mortgaged property.
Although the mortgage loans generally are non-recourse in nature, certain mortgage loans contain non-recourse carveouts for liabilities such as liabilities as a result of fraud by the borrower, certain voluntary insolvency proceedings or other matters. Certain mortgage loans set forth under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations” either do not contain non-recourse carveouts or contain material limitations to non-recourse carveouts. Often these obligations are guaranteed by an affiliate of the related borrower, although liability under any such guaranty may be capped or otherwise limited in amount or scope. Furthermore, certain guarantors may be foreign entities or individuals which, while subject to the domestic governing law provisions in the guaranty and related mortgage loan documents, could nevertheless require enforcement of any judgment in relation to a guaranty in a foreign jurisdiction, which could, in turn, cause a significant time delay or result in the inability to enforce the guaranty under foreign law. Additionally, the guarantor’s net worth and liquidity may be less (and in some cases, materially less) than amounts due under the related mortgage loan or the guarantor’s sole asset may be its interest in the related borrower. Certain mortgage loans may have the benefit of a general payment guaranty of a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage
64
loan. In all cases, however, the mortgage loans should be considered to be non-recourse obligations because neither the depositor nor the sponsors make any representation or warranty as to the obligation or ability of any borrower or guarantor to pay any deficiencies between any foreclosure proceeds and the mortgage loan indebtedness. In addition, certain mortgage loans may provide for recourse to a guarantor for a portion of the indebtedness or for any loss or costs that may be incurred by the borrower or the lender with respect to certain borrower obligations under the related mortgage loan documents. In such cases, we cannot assure you any recovery from such guarantor will be made or that such guarantor will have assets sufficient to pay any otherwise recoverable claim under a guaranty.
Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally
The mortgage loans will be secured by various income-producing commercial and multifamily properties. The repayment of a commercial or multifamily loan is typically dependent upon the ability of the related mortgaged property to produce cash flow through the collection of rents. Even the liquidation value of a commercial property is determined, in substantial part, by the capitalization of the property’s ability to produce cash flow. However, net operating income can be volatile and may be insufficient to cover debt service on the loan at any given time.
The net operating incomes and property values of the mortgaged properties may be adversely affected by a large number of factors. Some of these factors relate to the properties themselves, such as:
● | the age, design and construction quality of the properties; |
● | perceptions regarding the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the properties; |
● | the characteristics and desirability of the area where the property is located; |
● | the strength and nature of the local economy, including labor costs and quality, tax environment and quality of life for employees; |
● | the proximity and attractiveness of competing properties; |
● | the adequacy of the property’s management and maintenance; |
● | increases in interest rates, real estate taxes and operating expenses at the property and in relation to competing properties; |
● | an increase in the capital expenditures needed to maintain the properties or make improvements; |
● | the dependence upon a single tenant or concentration of tenants in a particular business or industry; |
● | a decline in the businesses operated by tenants or in their financial condition; |
● | an increase in vacancy rates; and |
● | a decline in rental rates as leases are renewed or entered into with new tenants. |
65
Other factors are more general in nature, such as:
● | national or regional economic conditions, including plant closings, military base closings, industry slowdowns, oil and/or gas drilling facility slowdowns or closings and unemployment rates; |
● | local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of competing properties, retail space, office space, multifamily housing or hotel capacity; |
● | demographic factors; |
● | consumer confidence; |
● | consumer tastes and preferences; |
● | political factors; |
● | environmental factors; |
● | seismic activity risk; |
● | retroactive changes in building codes; |
● | changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; |
● | location of certain mortgaged properties in less densely populated or less affluent areas; and |
● | the public perception of safety for customers and clients. |
The volatility of net operating income will be influenced by many of the foregoing factors, as well as by:
● | the length of tenant leases (including that in certain cases, all or substantially all of the tenants, or one or more sole, anchor or other major tenants, at a particular mortgaged property may have leases that expire or permit the tenant(s) to terminate its lease during the term of the loan); |
● | the quality and creditworthiness of tenants; |
● | tenant defaults; |
● | in the case of rental properties, the rate at which new rentals occur; and |
● | the property’s “operating leverage”, which is generally the percentage of total property expenses in relation to revenue, the ratio of fixed operating expenses to those that vary with revenues, and the level of capital expenditures required to maintain the property and to retain or replace tenants. |
A decline in the real estate market or in the financial condition of a major tenant will tend to have a more immediate effect on the net operating income of properties with relatively higher operating leverage or short term revenue sources, such as short term or month to month leases, and may lead to higher rates of delinquency or defaults.
66
Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases
General
Any tenant may, from time to time, experience a downturn in its business, which may weaken its financial condition and result in a reduction or failure to make rental payments when due. Tenants under certain leases included in the underwritten net cash flow, underwritten net operating income or occupancy may nonetheless be in financial distress. If tenants’ sales were to decline, percentage rents may decline and, further, tenants may be unable to pay their base rent or other occupancy costs. If a tenant defaults in its obligations to a property owner, that property owner may experience delays in enforcing its rights as lessor and may incur substantial costs and experience significant delays associated with protecting its investment, including costs incurred in renovating and reletting the property.
Additionally, the income from, and market value of, the mortgaged properties leased to various tenants would be adversely affected if:
● | space in the mortgaged properties could not be leased or re-leased or substantial re-leasing costs were required and/or the cost of performing landlord obligations under existing leases materially increased; |
● | leasing or re-leasing is restricted by exclusive rights of tenants to lease the mortgaged properties or other covenants not to lease space for certain uses or activities, or covenants limiting the types of tenants to which space may be leased; |
● | a significant tenant were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case; |
● | rental payments could not be collected for any other reason; or |
● | a borrower fails to perform its obligations under a lease resulting in the related tenant having a right to terminate such lease. |
In addition, certain tenants may be part of a chain that is in financial distress as a whole, or the tenant’s parent company may have implemented or expressed an intent to implement a plan to consolidate or reorganize its operations, close a number of stores in the chain, reduce exposure, relocate stores or otherwise reorganize its business to cut costs.
There may be (and there may exist from time to time) pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or disputes with, certain tenants and/or their parent companies that may have a material adverse effect on the related tenant’s ability to pay rent or remain open for business. We cannot assure you that any such litigation or dispute will not result in a material decline in net operating income at the related mortgaged property.
Certain tenants currently may be in a rent abatement period. We cannot assure you that such tenants will be in a position to pay full rent when the abatement period expires. We cannot assure you that the net operating income contributed by the mortgaged properties will remain at its current or past levels.
A Tenant Concentration May Result in Increased Losses
Mortgaged properties that are owner-occupied or leased to a single tenant, or a tenant that makes up a significant portion of the rental income, also are more susceptible to
67
interruptions of cash flow if that tenant’s business operations are negatively impacted or if such tenant fails to renew its lease. This is so because:
● | the financial effect of the absence of rental income may be severe; |
● | more time may be required to re-lease the space; and |
● | substantial capital costs may be incurred to make the space appropriate for replacement tenants. |
In the event of a default by that tenant, if the related lease expires prior to the mortgage loan maturity date and the related tenant fails to renew its lease or if such tenant exercises an early termination option, there would likely be an interruption of rental payments under the lease and, accordingly, insufficient funds available to the borrower to pay the debt service on the mortgage loan. In certain cases where the tenant owns the improvements on the mortgaged property, the related borrower may be required to purchase such improvements in connection with the exercise of its remedies.
With respect to certain of these mortgaged properties that are leased to a single tenant, the related leases may expire prior to, or soon after, the maturity dates of the mortgage loans or the related tenant may have the right to terminate the lease prior to the maturity date of the mortgage loan. If the current tenant does not renew its lease on comparable economic terms to the expired lease, if a single tenant terminates its lease or if a suitable replacement tenant does not enter into a new lease on similar economic terms, there could be a negative impact on the payments on the related mortgage loan.
A deterioration in the financial condition of a tenant, the failure of a tenant to renew its lease or the exercise by a tenant of an early termination right can be particularly significant if a mortgaged property is owner-occupied, leased to a single tenant, or if any tenant makes up a significant portion of the rental income at the mortgaged property.
Concentrations of particular tenants among the mortgaged properties or within a particular business or industry at one or multiple mortgaged properties increase the possibility that financial problems with such tenants or such business or industry sectors could affect the mortgage loans. In addition, the mortgage loans may be adversely affected if a tenant at the mortgaged property is highly specialized, or dependent on a single industry or only a few customers for its revenue. See “—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” below, and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Tenant Concentrations” for information on tenant concentrations in the mortgage pool.
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Multiple Tenants Also Have Risks
If a mortgaged property has multiple tenants, re-leasing expenditures may be more frequent than in the case of mortgaged properties with fewer tenants, thereby reducing the cash flow available for payments on the related mortgage loan. Multi-tenant mortgaged properties also may experience higher continuing vacancy rates and greater volatility in rental income and expenses. See Annex A-1 for tenant lease expiration dates for the 5 largest tenants at each mortgaged property.
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks
If a mortgaged property is leased in whole or substantial part to the borrower under the mortgage loan or to an affiliate of the borrower, there may be conflicts of interest. For instance, it is more likely a landlord will waive lease conditions for an affiliated tenant than
68
it would for an unaffiliated tenant. We cannot assure you that the conflicts of interest arising where a borrower is affiliated with a tenant at a mortgaged property will not adversely impact the value of the related mortgage loan.
In certain cases, an affiliated lessee may be a tenant under a master lease with the related borrower, under which the tenant is obligated to make rent payments but does not occupy any space at the mortgaged property. Master leases in these circumstances may be used to bring occupancy to a “stabilized” level with the intent of finding additional tenants to occupy some or all of the master leased space, but may not provide additional economic support for the mortgage loan. If a mortgaged property is leased in whole or substantial part to the borrower or to an affiliate of the borrower, a deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or its affiliate could significantly affect the borrower’s ability to perform under the mortgage loan as it would directly interrupt the cash flow from the mortgaged property if the borrower’s or its affiliate’s financial condition worsens. We cannot assure you that any space leased by a borrower or an affiliate of the borrower will eventually be occupied by third party tenants.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases” for information on properties leased in whole or in part to borrowers and their affiliates.
Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease
The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a number of smaller tenants, such as in retail properties, may have an adverse impact on the mortgaged properties affected and the income produced by such mortgaged properties. Under the federal bankruptcy code, a tenant has the option of assuming or rejecting or, subject to certain conditions, assuming and assigning to a third party, any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, the landlord’s claim for breach of the lease would (absent collateral securing the claim) be treated as a general unsecured claim against the tenant and a lessor’s damages for lease rejection are generally subject to certain limitations. We cannot assure you that tenants of the mortgaged properties will continue making payments under their leases or that tenants will not file for bankruptcy protection in the future or, if any tenants do file, that they will continue to make rental payments in a timely manner. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” for information regarding bankruptcy issues with respect to certain mortgage loans.
In the case of certain mortgage loans included in the mortgage pool, it may be possible that the related master lease could be construed in a bankruptcy as a financing lease or other arrangement under which the related master lessee (and/or its affiliates) would be deemed as effectively the owner of the related mortgaged property, rather than a tenant, which could result in potentially adverse consequences for the trust, as the holder of such mortgage loan, including treatment of the mortgage loan as an unsecured obligation, a potentially greater risk of an unfavorable plan of reorganization and competing claims of creditors of the related master lessee and/or its affiliates. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases”.
Leases That Are Not Subordinated to the Lien of the Mortgage or Do Not Contain Attornment Provisions May Have an Adverse Impact at Foreclosure
In certain jurisdictions, if tenant leases are subordinated to the liens created by the mortgage but do not contain attornment provisions that require the tenant to recognize a successor owner, the tenants may terminate their leases upon the transfer of the property to a foreclosing lender or purchaser at foreclosure. Accordingly, if a mortgaged property is
69
located in such a jurisdiction and is leased to one or more desirable tenants under leases that are subordinate to the mortgage and do not contain attornment provisions, such mortgaged property could experience a further decline in value if such tenants’ leases were terminated. This is particularly likely if those tenants were paying above-market rents or could not be replaced. If a lease is not subordinate to a mortgage, the issuing entity will not possess the right to dispossess the tenant upon foreclosure of the mortgaged property (unless otherwise agreed to with the tenant). Also, if the lease contains provisions inconsistent with the mortgage (e.g., provisions relating to application of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards) or which could affect the enforcement of the lender’s rights (e.g., a right of first refusal to purchase the property), the provisions of the lease will take precedence over the provisions of the mortgage. Not all leases were reviewed to ascertain the existence of attornment or subordination provisions.
With respect to certain of the mortgage loans, the related borrower may have given to certain tenants or others an option to purchase, a right of first refusal and/or a right of first offer to purchase all or a portion of the mortgaged property in the event a sale is contemplated, and such right is not subordinate to the related mortgage. This may impede the mortgagee’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure, or, upon foreclosure, this may affect the value and/or marketability of the related mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal” for information regarding material purchase options and/or rights of first refusal, if any, with respect to mortgaged properties securing certain mortgage loans.
Early Lease Termination Options May Reduce Cash Flow
Leases often give tenants the right to terminate the related lease, abate or reduce the related rent, and/or exercise certain remedies against the related borrower for various reasons or upon various conditions, including:
● | if the borrower for the applicable mortgaged property allows uses at the mortgaged property in violation of use restrictions in current tenant leases, |
● | if the borrower or any of its affiliates owns other properties within a certain radius of the mortgaged property and allows uses at those properties in violation of use restrictions, |
● | if the related borrower fails to provide a designated number of parking spaces, |
● | if there is construction at the related mortgaged property or an adjacent property (whether or not such adjacent property is owned or controlled by the borrower or any of its affiliates) that may interfere with visibility of, access to or a tenant’s use of the mortgaged property or otherwise violate the terms of a tenant’s lease, |
● | upon casualty or condemnation with respect to all or a portion of the mortgaged property that renders such mortgaged property unsuitable for a tenant’s use or if the borrower fails to rebuild such mortgaged property within a certain time, |
● | if a tenant’s use is not permitted by zoning or applicable law, |
● | if the tenant is unable to exercise an expansion right, |
● | if the landlord defaults on its obligations under the lease, |
● | if a landlord leases space at the mortgaged property or within a certain radius of the mortgaged property to a competitor, |
70
● | if the tenant fails to meet certain sales targets or other business objectives for a specified period of time, |
● | if significant tenants at the subject property go dark or terminate their leases, or if a specified percentage of the mortgaged property is unoccupied, |
● | if the landlord violates the tenant’s exclusive use rights for a specified period of time, |
● | if the related borrower violates covenants under the related lease or if third parties take certain actions that adversely affect such tenants’ business or operations, |
● | in the case of government sponsored tenants, at any time or for lack of appropriations, or |
● | if the related borrower violates covenants under the related lease or if third parties take certain actions that adversely affect such tenants’ business or operations. |
In certain cases, compliance or satisfaction of landlord covenants may be the responsibility of a third party affiliated with the borrower or, in the event that partial releases of the applicable mortgaged property are permitted, an unaffiliated or affiliated third party.
Any exercise of a termination right by a tenant at a mortgaged property could result in vacant space at the related mortgaged property, renegotiation of the lease with the related tenant or re-letting of the space. Any such vacated space may not be re-let. Furthermore, such foregoing termination and/or abatement rights may arise in the future or materially adversely affect the related borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Lease Expirations and Terminations” for information on material tenant lease expirations and early termination options.
Mortgaged Properties Leased to Not-for-Profit Tenants Also Have Risks
Certain mortgaged properties may have tenants that are charitable institutions that generally rely on contributions from individuals and government grants or other subsidies to pay rent on office space and other operating expenses. We cannot assure you that the rate, frequency and level of individual contributions or governmental grants and subsidies will continue with respect to any such institution. A reduction in contributions or grants may impact the ability of the related institution to pay rent, and we cannot assure you that the related borrower will be in a position to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents if such tenant fails to pay its rent.
Office Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of office properties, including:
● | the physical attributes of the building in relation to competing buildings (e.g., age, condition, design, appearance, access to transportation and ability to offer certain amenities, such as sophisticated building systems and/or business wiring requirements); |
71
● | the adaptability of the building to changes in the technological needs of the tenants; |
● | an adverse change in population, patterns of telecommuting or sharing of office space, and employment growth (which creates demand for office space); and |
● | in the case of a medical office property, (a) the proximity of such property to a hospital or other healthcare establishment, (b) reimbursements for patient fees from private or government sponsored insurers, (c) its ability to attract doctors and nurses to be on staff, and (d) its ability to afford and acquire the latest medical equipment. Issues related to reimbursement (ranging from nonpayment to delays in payment) from such insurers could adversely impact cash flow at such mortgaged property. |
Certain office tenants at the mortgaged properties may use their leased space to create shared workspaces that they lease to other businesses. Shared workspaces are rented by customers on a short term basis. Short term space users may be more impacted by economic fluctuations compared to traditional long term office leases, which has the potential to impact operating profitability of the office tenant offering the shared space and, in turn, its ability to maintain its lease payments. This may subject the related mortgage loan to increased risk of default and loss.
Moreover, the cost of refitting office space for a new tenant is often higher than the cost of refitting other types of properties for new tenants.
If one or more major tenants at a particular office property were to close or remain vacant, we cannot assure you that such tenants would be replaced in a timely manner or without incurring material additional costs to the related borrower and resulting in an adverse effect on the financial performance of the property.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Office Properties”.
Retail Properties Have Special Risks
Some of the mortgage loans are secured by retail properties. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Retail Properties.” The value of retail properties is significantly affected by the quality of the tenants as well as fundamental aspects of real estate, such as location and market demographics, as well as changes in shopping methods and choices. Some of the risks related to these matters are further described in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, and “—Changes in the Retail Sector, Such as Online Shopping and Other Uses of Technology, Could Affect the Business Models and Viability of Retailers”, “—The Performance of the Retail Properties is Subject to Conditions Affecting the Retail Sector” and “—Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants” below.
Rental payments from tenants of retail properties typically comprise the largest portion of the net operating income of those mortgaged properties. The correlation between success of tenant business and a retail property’s value may be more direct with respect to retail properties than other types of commercial property because a component of the total rent paid by certain retail tenants is often tied to a percentage of gross sales. We cannot assure
72
you that the net operating income contributed by the retail mortgaged properties or the rates of occupancy at the retail stores will remain at the levels specified in this prospectus or remain consistent with past performance.
Changes in the Retail Sector, Such as Online Shopping and Other Uses of Technology, Could Affect the Business Models and Viability of Retailers
Online shopping and the use of technology, such as smartphone shopping applications, to transact purchases or to aid purchasing decisions have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to increase in the future. This trend is affecting business models, sales and profitability of some retailers and could adversely affect the demand for retail real estate and occupancy at retail properties securing the mortgage loans. Any resulting decreases in rental revenue could have a material adverse effect on the value of retail properties securing the mortgage loans.
Some of these developments in the retail sector have led to retail companies, including several national retailers, filing for bankruptcy and/or voluntarily closing certain of their stores. Borrowers may be unable to re-lease such space or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms. As a result, the bankruptcy or closure of a national tenant may adversely affect a retail borrower’s revenues. In addition, such closings may allow other tenants to modify their leases to terms that are less favorable for borrowers or to terminate their leases, also adversely impacting their revenues. See also “—Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants” below.
In addition to competition from online shopping, retail properties face competition from sources outside a specific geographical real estate market. For example, all of the following compete with more traditional retail properties for consumer dollars: factory outlet centers, discount shopping centers and clubs, catalogue retailers, home shopping networks, and telemarketing. Continued growth of these alternative retail outlets (which often have lower operating costs) could adversely affect the rents collectible at the retail properties included in the pool of mortgage loans, as well as the income from, and market value of, the mortgaged properties and the related borrower’s ability to refinance such property. Moreover, additional competing retail properties may be built in the areas where the retail properties are located.
We cannot assure you that these developments in the retail sector will not adversely affect the performance of retail properties securing the mortgage loans.
The Performance of the Retail Properties is Subject to Conditions Affecting the Retail Sector
Retail properties are also subject to conditions that could negatively affect the retail sector, such as increased unemployment, increased federal income and payroll taxes, increased health care costs, increased state and local taxes, increased real estate taxes, industry slowdowns, lack of availability of consumer credit, weak income growth, increased levels of consumer debt, poor housing market conditions, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, plant closings, and other factors. Similarly, local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods, and the supply and creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants may negatively impact those retail properties.
73
In addition, the limited adaptability of certain shopping malls that have proven unprofitable may result in high (and possibly extremely high) loss severities on mortgage loans secured by those shopping malls. For example, it is possible that a significant amount of advances made by the applicable servicer(s) of a mortgage loan secured by a shopping mall property, combined with low liquidation proceeds in respect of that property, may result in a loss severity exceeding 100% of the outstanding principal balance of that mortgage loan.
Some Retail Properties Depend on Anchor Stores or Major Tenants to Attract Shoppers and Could be Materially Adversely Affected by the Loss of, or a Store Closure by, One or More of These Anchor Stores or Major Tenants
The presence or absence of an “anchor tenant” or a “shadow anchor tenant” in or near a retail property also can be important to the performance of a retail property because anchors play a key role in generating customer traffic and making a retail property desirable for other tenants. Retail properties may also have shadow anchor tenants. An “anchor tenant” is located on the related mortgaged property, usually proportionately larger in size than most or all other tenants in the mortgaged property, and is vital in attracting customers to a retail property. A “shadow anchor tenant” is usually proportionally larger in size than most tenants in the mortgaged property, is important in attracting customers to a retail property and is located sufficiently close and convenient to the mortgaged property so as to influence and attract potential customers, but is not located on the mortgaged property.
If anchor stores in a mortgaged property were to close, the related borrower may be unable to replace those anchors in a timely manner or without suffering adverse economic consequences. In addition, anchor tenants and non-anchor tenants at anchored or shadow anchored retail centers may have co-tenancy clauses and/or operating covenants in their leases or operating agreements that permit those tenants or anchor stores to cease operating, reduce rent or terminate their leases if the anchor or shadow anchor tenant or another major tenant goes dark, if the mortgaged property does not meet certain minimum occupancy levels or if the subject store is not meeting the minimum sales requirement under its lease. Even if non-anchor tenants do not have termination or rent abatement rights, the loss of an anchor tenant or a shadow anchor tenant may have a material adverse impact on the non-anchor tenant’s ability to operate because the anchor or shadow anchor tenant plays a key role in generating customer traffic and making a center desirable for other tenants. This, in turn, may adversely impact the borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan. In addition, in the event that a “shadow anchor” fails to renew its lease, terminates its lease or otherwise ceases to conduct business within a close proximity to the mortgaged property, customer traffic at the mortgaged property may be substantially reduced. If an anchor tenant goes dark, generally the borrower’s only remedy may be to terminate that lease after the anchor tenant has been dark for a specified amount of time.
If anchor tenants or shadow anchor tenants at a particular mortgaged property were to close or otherwise become vacant or remain vacant, we cannot assure you that the related borrower’s ability to repay its mortgage loan would not be materially and adversely affected.
Certain anchor tenant and tenant estoppels will have been obtained in connection with the origination of the mortgage loans. These estoppels may identify disputes between the related borrower and the applicable anchor tenant or tenant, or alleged defaults or potential defaults by the applicable property owner under the lease or a reciprocal easement and/or operating agreement (each, an “REA”). Such disputes, defaults or potential defaults, could lead to a termination or attempted termination of the applicable lease or REA by the anchor
74
tenant or tenant or to the tenant withholding some or all of its rental payments or to litigation against the related borrower. We cannot assure you that the anchor tenant or tenant estoppels obtained identify all potential disputes that may arise with respect to the retail mortgaged properties, or that anchor tenant or tenant disputes will not have a material adverse effect on the ability of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans.
Industrial Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of industrial properties, including:
● | reduced demand for industrial space because of a decline in a particular industry segment; |
● | the property becoming functionally obsolete; |
● | building design and adaptability; |
● | unavailability of labor sources; |
● | changes in access, energy prices, strikes, relocation of highways, the construction of additional highways or other factors; |
● | changes in proximity of supply sources; |
● | the expenses of converting a previously adapted space to general use; and |
● | the location of the property. |
Industrial properties may be adversely affected by reduced demand for industrial space occasioned by a decline in a particular industry segment in which the related tenants conduct their businesses (for example, a decline in consumer demand for products sold by a tenant using the property as a distribution center). In addition, a particular industrial or warehouse property that suited the needs of its original tenant may be difficult to relet to another tenant or may become functionally obsolete relative to newer properties. Furthermore, lease terms with respect to industrial properties are generally for shorter periods of time and may result in a substantial percentage of leases expiring in the same year at any particular industrial property. In addition, mortgaged properties used for many industrial purposes are more prone to environmental concerns than other property types.
Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of an industrial property. Site characteristics that are generally desirable to a warehouse/industrial property include high clear ceiling heights, wide column spacing, a large number of bays (loading docks) and large bay depths, divisibility, a layout that can accommodate large truck minimum turning radii and overall functionality and accessibility.
In addition, because of unique construction requirements of many industrial properties, any vacant industrial property space may not be easily converted to other uses. Thus, if the operation of any of the industrial properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of the improvements or other factors such that the borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the related mortgage loan, the liquidation value of that industrial property may be substantially less, relative to the amount owing on the related mortgage loan, than would be the case if the industrial property were readily adaptable to other uses.
75
Location is also important because an industrial property requires the availability of labor sources, proximity to supply sources and customers and accessibility to rail lines, major roadways and other distribution channels.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Industrial Properties”.
Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of multifamily properties, including:
● | the quality of property management; |
● | the ability of management to provide adequate maintenance and insurance; |
● | the types of services or amenities that the property provides; |
● | the property’s reputation; |
● | the level of mortgage interest rates, which may encourage tenants to purchase rather than lease housing; |
● | the generally short terms of residential leases and the need for continued reletting; |
● | rent concessions and month-to-month leases, which may impact cash flow at the property; |
● | the tenant mix, such as the tenant population being predominantly students or being heavily dependent on workers from a particular business or industry or personnel from or workers related to a local military base or oil and/or gas drilling industries; |
● | in the case of student housing facilities or properties leased primarily to students, which may be more susceptible to damage or wear and tear than other types of multifamily housing, the reliance on the financial well-being of the college or university to which it relates, competition from on campus housing units and new competitive student housing properties, which may adversely affect occupancy, the physical layout of the housing, which may not be readily convertible to traditional multifamily use, rental payments that may depend on financial aid, and that student tenants have a higher turnover rate than other types of multifamily tenants, which in certain cases is compounded by the fact that student leases are available for periods of less than 12 months; |
● | certain multifamily properties may be considered to be “flexible apartment properties”. Such properties have a significant percentage of units leased to tenants under short-term leases (less than one year in term), which creates a higher turnover rate than for other types of multifamily properties; |
● | restrictions on the age or income of tenants who may reside at the property; |
76
● | dependence upon governmental programs that provide rent subsidies to tenants pursuant to tenant voucher programs, which vouchers may be used at other properties and influence tenant mobility; |
● | adverse local, regional or national economic conditions, which may limit the amount of rent that may be charged and may result in a reduction of timely rent payments or a reduction in occupancy levels; |
● | state and local regulations, which may affect the building owner’s ability to increase rent to market rent for an equivalent apartment; and |
● | the existence of government assistance/rent subsidy programs, and whether or not they continue and provide the same level of assistance or subsidies. |
Certain states regulate the relationship between an owner and its tenants. Commonly, these laws require a written lease, good cause for eviction, disclosure of fees, and notification to residents of changed land use, while prohibiting unreasonable rules, retaliatory evictions, and restrictions on a resident’s choice of unit vendors. Apartment building owners have been the subject of suits under state “Unfair and Deceptive Practices Acts” and other general consumer protection statutes for coercive, abusive or unconscionable leasing and sales practices. A few states offer more significant protection. For example, in some states, there are provisions that limit the bases on which a landlord may terminate a tenancy or increase a tenant’s rent or prohibit a landlord from terminating a tenancy solely by reason of the sale of the owner’s building.
In addition to state regulation of the landlord tenant relationship, numerous counties and municipalities impose rent control on apartment buildings. These ordinances may limit rent increases to fixed percentages, to percentages of increases in the consumer price index, to increases set or approved by a governmental agency, or to increases determined through mediation or binding arbitration. Any limitations on a borrower’s ability to raise property rents may impair such borrower’s ability to repay its multifamily loan from its net operating income or the proceeds of a sale or refinancing of the related multifamily property.
Certain of the mortgage loans may be secured in the future by mortgaged properties that are subject to certain affordable housing covenants and other covenants and restrictions with respect to various tax credit, city, state and federal housing subsidies, rent stabilization or similar programs, in respect of various units within the mortgaged properties. The limitations and restrictions imposed by these programs could result in losses on the mortgage loans. In addition, in the event that the program is cancelled, it could result in less income for the project. These programs may include, among others:
● | rent limitations that would adversely affect the ability of borrowers to increase rents to maintain the condition of their mortgaged properties and satisfy operating expenses; and |
● | tenant income restrictions that may reduce the number of eligible tenants in those mortgaged properties and result in a reduction in occupancy rates. |
The difference in rents between subsidized or supported properties and other multifamily rental properties in the same area may not be a sufficient economic incentive for some eligible tenants to reside at a subsidized or supported property that may have fewer amenities or be less attractive as a residence. As a result, occupancy levels at a subsidized
77
or supported property may decline, which may adversely affect the value and successful operation of such property.
Moreover, ongoing litigation concerning the status of rent stabilized properties may adversely affect existing market rent units and a borrower’s ability to convert rent stabilized units to market rent units in the future. For example, the New York State Appellate Division, in Altman v. 285 West Fourth (1st Dept., 2015) held that in order to effectuate vacancy luxury deregulation, the legal rent had to be above the statutory deregulation threshold at the time the outgoing tenant vacated and the fact that the legal rent was above the statutory threshold at the time the incoming tenant moved in was not relevant. The Altman case is currently on appeal and scheduled to be heard by the New York Court of Appeals. The mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers includes both rent stabilized units and market rent units. In addition, with respect to the mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio, the Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – Saint John’s mortgaged property previously included rent stabilized units, and one of those units is currently the subject of a claim before the New York City Department of Housing and Community Renewal regarding rent overcharges (see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations”). If the New York Court of Appeals were to uphold the Altman decision, no assurances can be made as to the impact on the existing market rent units at the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers mortgaged properties or at the Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – Saint John’s mortgaged property or the ability of the rent stabilized units at the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers mortgaged properties to convert to market rent units in the future.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Multifamily Properties”.
Mixed Use Properties Have Special Risks
Certain properties are mixed use properties. Such mortgaged properties are subject to the risks relating to the property types described in, “—Office Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Retail Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Parking Properties Have Special Risks”. See Annex A-1 for the 5 largest tenants (by net rentable area leased) at each mixed use property. A mixed use property may be subject to additional risks, including the property manager’s inexperience in managing the different property types that comprise such mixed use property.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Mixed Use Properties”.
Hotel Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” above, various other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of hotel properties, including:
● | adverse economic and social conditions, either local, regional or national (which may limit the amount that can be charged for a room and reduce occupancy levels); |
● | continuing expenditures for modernizing, refurbishing and maintaining existing facilities prior to the expiration of their anticipated useful lives; |
78
● | ability to convert to alternative uses which may not be readily made; |
● | a deterioration in the financial strength or managerial capabilities of the owner or operator of a hotel property; |
● | changes in travel patterns caused by general adverse economic conditions, fear of terrorist attacks, adverse weather conditions and changes in access, energy prices, strikes, travel costs, relocation of highways, the construction of additional highways, concerns about travel safety or other factors; and |
● | relative illiquidity of hospitality investments which limits the ability of the borrowers and property managers to respond to changes in economic or other conditions. |
Because hotel rooms are generally rented for short periods of time, the financial performance of hotel properties tends to be affected by adverse economic conditions and competition more quickly than other commercial properties. Additionally, as a result of high operating costs, relatively small decreases in revenue can cause significant stress on a property’s cash flow.
Moreover, the hospitality and lodging industry is generally seasonal in nature and different seasons affect different hotel properties differently depending on type and location. This seasonality can be expected to cause periodic fluctuations in a hotel property’s room and restaurant revenues, occupancy levels, room rates and operating expenses. We cannot assure you that cash flow will be sufficient to offset any shortfalls that occur at the mortgaged property during slower periods or that the related mortgage loans provide for seasonality reserves, or if seasonality reserves are provided for, that such reserves will be funded or will be sufficient or available to fund such shortfalls.
In addition, certain hotel properties are limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels. Hotel properties that are limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels may subject a lender to more risk than full-service hotel properties as they generally require less capital for construction than full-service hotel properties. In addition, as limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels generally offer fewer amenities than full-service hotel properties, they are less distinguishable from each other. As a result, it is easier for limited-service, select service or extended stay hotels to experience increased or unforeseen competition.
In addition to hotel operations, some hotel properties also operate entertainment complexes that include restaurants, lounges, nightclubs and/or banquet and meeting spaces and may derive a significant portion of the related property’s revenue from such operations. Consumer demand for entertainment resorts is particularly sensitive to downturns in the economy and the corresponding impact on discretionary spending on leisure activities. Changes in discretionary consumer spending or consumer preferences could be driven by factors such as perceived or actual general economic conditions, high energy, fuel and food costs, the increased cost of travel, the weakened job market, perceived or actual disposable consumer income and wealth, fears of recession and changes in consumer confidence in the economy, or fears of war and future acts of terrorism. These factors could reduce consumer demand for the leisure activities that the property offers, thus imposing practical limits on pricing and harming operations. Restaurants and nightclubs are particularly vulnerable to changes in consumer preferences. In addition, a nightclub’s, restaurant’s or bar’s revenue is extremely dependent on its popularity and perception. These characteristics are subject to change rapidly and we cannot assure you that any of a hotel property’s nightclubs, restaurants or bars will maintain their current level of popularity or perception in the
79
market. Any such change could have a material adverse effect on the net cash flow of the property.
Some of the hotel properties have liquor licenses associated with the mortgaged property. The liquor licenses for these mortgaged properties are generally held by affiliates of the related borrowers, unaffiliated managers or operating lessees. The laws and regulations relating to liquor licenses generally prohibit the transfer of such licenses to any person, or condition such transfer on the prior approval of the governmental authority that issued the license. In the event of a foreclosure of a hotel property that holds a liquor license, the special servicer on behalf of the issuing entity or a purchaser in a foreclosure sale would likely have to apply for a new license, which might not be granted or might be granted only after a delay that could be significant. We cannot assure you that a new license could be obtained promptly or at all. The lack of a liquor license in a hotel property could have an adverse impact on the revenue from the related mortgaged property or on the hotel property’s occupancy rate.
In addition, hotel properties may be structured with a master lease (or operating lease) in order to minimize potential liabilities of the borrower. Under the master lease structure, an operating lessee (typically affiliated with the borrower) is also an obligor under the related mortgage loan and the operating lessee borrower pays rent to the fee owner borrower.
In addition, there may be risks associated with hotel properties that have not entered into or become a party to any franchise agreement, license agreement or other “flag”. Hotel properties often enter into these types of agreements in order to align the hotel property with a certain public perception or to benefit from a centralized reservation system. We cannot assure you that hotel properties that lack such benefits will be able to operate successfully on an independent basis.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Hotel Properties”.
Risks Relating to Affiliation with a Franchise or Hotel Management Company
The performance of a hotel property affiliated with a franchise or hotel management company depends in part on:
● | the continued existence and financial strength of the franchisor or hotel management company; |
● | the public perception of the franchise or hotel chain service mark; and |
● | the duration of the franchise licensing or management agreements. |
The continuation of a franchise agreement, license agreement or management agreement is subject to specified operating standards and other terms and conditions set forth in such agreements. The failure of a borrower to maintain such standards or adhere to other applicable terms and conditions, such as property improvement plans, could result in the loss or cancellation of their rights under the franchise, license or hotel management agreement. We cannot assure you that a replacement franchise could be obtained in the event of termination or that such replacement franchise affiliation would be of equal quality to the terminated franchise affiliation. In addition, a replacement franchise, license and/or hotel property manager may require significantly higher fees as well as the investment of capital to bring the hotel property into compliance with the requirements of the replacement
80
franchisor, licensor and/or hotel property manager. Any provision in a franchise agreement, license agreement or management agreement providing for termination because of a bankruptcy of a franchisor, licensor or manager generally will not be enforceable.
The transferability of franchise agreements, license agreements and property management agreements may be restricted. In the event of a foreclosure, the lender may not have the right to use the franchise license without the franchisor’s consent or the manager might be able to terminate the management agreement. Conversely, in the case of certain mortgage loans, the lender may be unable to remove a franchisor/licensor or a hotel management company that it desires to replace following a foreclosure and, further, may be limited as regards the pool of potential transferees for a foreclosure or real estate owned property.
In some cases where a hotel property is subject to a license or franchise agreement, the licensor or franchisor has required or may in the future require the completion of various repairs and/or renovations pursuant to a property improvement plan issued by the licensor or franchisor. Failure to complete those repairs and/or renovations in accordance with the plan could result in the hotel property losing its license or franchise. Annex A-1 and the related footnotes set forth the amount of reserves, if any, established under the related mortgage loans in connection with any of those repairs and/or renovations. We cannot assure you that any amounts reserved will be sufficient to complete the repairs and/or renovations required with respect to any affected hotel property. In addition, in some cases, those reserves will be maintained by the franchisor or property manager. Furthermore, the lender may not require a reserve for repairs and/or renovations in all instances.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Hotel Properties”.
Self Storage Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of self storage properties, including:
● | decreased demand; |
● | lack of proximity to apartment complexes or commercial users; |
● | apartment tenants moving to single family homes; |
● | decline in services rendered, including security; |
● | dependence on business activity ancillary to renting units; |
● | security concerns; |
● | age of improvements; or |
● | competition or other factors. |
Self storage properties are considered vulnerable to competition, because both acquisition costs and break-even occupancy are relatively low. The conversion of self
81
storage facilities to alternative uses would generally require substantial capital expenditures. Thus, if the operation of any of the self storage properties becomes unprofitable, the liquidation value of that self storage mortgaged property may be substantially less, relative to the amount owing on the mortgage loan, than if the self storage mortgaged property were readily adaptable to other uses. In addition, storage units are typically engaged for shorter time frames than traditional commercial leases for office or retail space.
Tenants at self storage properties tend to require and receive privacy, anonymity and efficient access, each of which may heighten environmental and other risks related to such property as the borrower may be unaware of the contents in any self storage unit. No environmental assessment of a self storage mortgaged property included an inspection of the contents of the self storage units at that mortgaged property, and there is no assurance that all of the units included in the self storage mortgaged properties are free from hazardous substances or other pollutants or contaminants or will remain so in the future.
Certain mortgage loans secured by self storage properties may be affiliated with a franchise company through a franchise agreement. The performance of a self storage property affiliated with a franchise company may be affected by the continued existence and financial strength of the franchisor, the public perception of a service mark, and the duration of the franchise agreement. The transferability of franchise license agreements is restricted. In the event of a foreclosure, the lender or its agent would not have the right to use the franchise license without the franchisor’s consent.
In addition, certain self storage properties may derive a material portion of revenue from business activities ancillary to self storage such as truck rentals, parking fees and similar activities which require special use permits or other discretionary zoning approvals and/or from leasing a portion of the subject property for office or retail purposes. See Annex A-1 and the footnotes related thereto.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Self Storage Properties”.
Manufactured Housing Community Properties Have Special Risks
In addition to the factors discussed in “—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally” and “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases” above, other factors may adversely affect the financial performance and value of manufactured housing community properties, including:
● | the number of competing residential developments in the local market, such as: other manufactured housing community properties, apartment buildings and site-built single family homes; |
● | the physical attributes of the community, including its age and appearance; |
● | the location of the manufactured housing community property; |
● | the presence and/or continued presence of sufficient manufactured homes at the manufactured housing community property (manufactured homes are not generally part of the collateral for a mortgage loan secured by a manufactured housing community property; rather, the pads upon which manufactured homes are located are leased to the owners of such manufactured homes; accordingly, manufactured homes may be moved from a manufactured housing community property); |
● | the type of services or amenities it provides; |
82
● | any age restrictions; |
● | the property’s reputation; and |
● | state and local regulations, including rent control and rent stabilization, and tenant association rights. |
The manufactured housing community properties have few improvements (which are highly specialized) and are “single purpose” properties that could not be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Thus, if the operation of any of the manufactured housing community properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of the improvements or other factors such that the borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the related mortgage loan, the liquidation value of that manufactured housing community property may be substantially less, relative to the amount owing on the related mortgage loan, than would be the case if the manufactured housing community property were readily adaptable to other uses.
Some manufactured housing community properties are either recreational vehicle resorts or have a significant portion of the properties that are intended to accommodate short-term occupancy by recreational vehicles, and tenancy of these communities may vary significantly by season. This seasonality may cause periodic fluctuations in revenues, tenancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses for these properties.
Some of the manufactured housing community mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans in the trust may have a material number of leased homes that are currently owned by the related borrower or an affiliate thereof and rented by the respective tenants like apartments. In circumstances where the leased homes are owned by an affiliate of the borrower, the related pads may, in some cases, be subject to a master lease with that affiliate. In such cases, the tenants will tend to be more transient and less tied to the property than if they owned their own home. Such leased homes do not, in all (or, possibly, in any) such cases, constitute collateral for the related mortgage loan. Some of the leased homes that are not collateral for the related mortgage loan are rented on a lease-to-own basis. In some cases, the borrower itself owns, leases, sells and/or finances the sale of homes, although generally the related income therefrom will be excluded for loan underwriting purposes. See also representation and warranty no. 31 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1). Some of the leased homes owned by a borrower or its affiliate may be financed and a default on that financing may materially adversely affect the performance of the manufactured housing community mortgaged property.
Certain of the manufactured housing community mortgaged properties may not be connected in their entirety to public water and/or sewer systems. In such cases, the borrower could incur a substantial expense if it were required to connect the property to such systems in the future. In addition, the use of well water enhances the likelihood that the property could be adversely affected by a recognized environmental condition that impacts soil and groundwater.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types—Manufactured Housing Community Properties”.
Parking Properties Have Special Risks
Certain of the mortgaged properties are comprised in whole or in part of, or contain, a parking lot or parking garage. The primary source of income for parking lots and garages is
83
the rental fees charged for parking spaces (or in the case of a parking lot or parking garage leased in whole or part to a parking garage or parking lot operator, rents from such operating lease). Factors affecting the success of a parking lot or garage include:
● | the number of rentable parking spaces and rates charged; |
● | the location of the lot or garage and, in particular, its proximity to places where large numbers of people work, shop or live; |
● | the amount of alternative parking spaces in the area; |
● | the availability of mass transit; and |
● | the perceptions of the safety, convenience and services of the lot or garage. |
Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of a parking garage facility. Site characteristics that are valuable to a parking garage facility include location, clear ceiling heights, column spacing, zoning restrictions, number of spaces and overall functionality and accessibility.
In addition, because of the unique construction requirements of many parking garages and because a parking lot is often vacant paved land without any structure, a vacant parking garage facility or parking lot may not be easily converted to other uses. See “—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”.
With respect to parking properties leased to a parking garage, parking lot operator or single tenant user, such leases generally provide the parking operator the right to terminate such leases upon various contingencies, which may include if there are specified reductions in gross receipts, or specified income targets are not met, if certain subleases of such parking properties are terminated or reduced, or upon a specified amount of capital expenditures to such properties being required in order to comply with applicable law, or other adverse events. There can be no assurance that the operating lessee of a parking property will not terminate its lease upon such an event.
Leased Fee Properties Have Special Risks
Land subject to a ground lease presents special risks. In such cases, where the borrower owns the fee interest but not the related improvements, such borrower will only receive the rental income from the ground lease and not from the operation of any related improvements. Any default by the ground lessee would adversely affect the borrower’s ability to make payments on the related mortgage loan. While ground leases may contain certain restrictions on the use and operation of the related mortgaged property, the ground lessee generally enjoys the rights and privileges of a fee owner, including the right to construct, alter and remove improvements and fixtures from the land and to assign and sublet the ground leasehold interest. However, the borrower has the same risk of interruptions in cash flow if such ground lessee defaults under its lease as it would on another single tenant commercial property, without the control over the premises that it would ordinarily have as landlord. In addition, in the event of a condemnation, the borrower would only be entitled to an allocable share of the condemnation proceeds. Furthermore, the insurance requirements are often governed by the terms of the ground lease and, in some cases, certain tenants or subtenants may be allowed to self-insure. The ground lessee is commonly permitted to mortgage its ground leasehold interest, and the leasehold lender will often have notice and cure rights with respect to material defaults under the ground lease. In addition, leased fee interests are less frequently purchased and
84
sold than other interests in commercial real property. It may be difficult for the issuing entity, if it became a foreclosing lender, to sell the fee interest if the tenant and its improvements remain on the land. In addition, if the improvements are nearing the end of their useful life, there could be a risk that the tenant defaults in lieu of performing any obligations it may otherwise have to raze the structure and return the land in raw form to the developer. Furthermore, leased fee interests are generally subject to the same risks associated with the property type of the ground lessee’s use of the premises because that use is a source of revenue for the payment of ground rent. See representation and warranty no. 34 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements
The management and operation of a condominium is generally controlled by a condominium board representing the owners of the individual condominium units, subject to the terms of the related condominium rules or by-laws. Generally, the consent of a majority of the board members is required for any actions of the condominium board and a unit owner’s ability to control decisions of the board are generally related to the number of units owned by such owner as a percentage of the total number of units in the condominium. In certain cases, the related borrower does not have a majority of votes on the condominium board, which result in the related borrower not having control of the related condominium or owners association.
The board of managers or directors of the related condominium generally has discretion to make decisions affecting the condominium, and we cannot assure you that the related borrower under a mortgage loan secured by one or more interests in that condominium will have any control over decisions made by the related board of managers or directors. Even if a borrower or its designated board members, either through control of the appointment and voting of sufficient members of the related condominium board or by virtue of other provisions in the related condominium documents, has consent rights over actions by the related condominium associations or owners, we cannot assure you that the related condominium board will not take actions that would materially adversely affect the related borrower’s unit. Thus, decisions made by that board of managers or directors, including regarding assessments to be paid by the unit owners, insurance to be maintained on the condominium and many other decisions affecting the maintenance of that condominium, may have a significant adverse impact on the related mortgage loans in the issuing entity that are secured by mortgaged properties consisting of such condominium interests. We cannot assure you that the related board of managers or directors will always act in the best interests of the related borrower under the related mortgage loans.
The condominium board is generally responsible for administration of the affairs of the condominium, including providing for maintenance and repair of common areas, adopting rules and regulations regarding common areas, and obtaining insurance and repairing and restoring the common areas of the property after a casualty. Notwithstanding the insurance and casualty provisions of the related mortgage loan documents, the condominium board may have the right to control the use of casualty proceeds.
In addition, the condominium board generally has the right to assess individual unit owners for their share of expenses related to the operation and maintenance of the common elements. In the event that an owner of another unit fails to pay its allocated assessments, the related borrower may be required to pay such assessments in order to properly maintain and operate the common elements of the property. Although the condominium board generally may obtain a lien against any unit owner for common expenses that are not paid, such lien generally is extinguished if a lender takes possession pursuant to a
85
foreclosure. Each unit owner is responsible for maintenance of its respective unit and retains essential operational control over its unit.
In addition, due to the nature of condominiums, a default on the part of the borrower with respect to such mortgaged properties will not allow the special servicer the same flexibility in realizing on the collateral as is generally available with respect to commercial properties that are not condominium units. The rights of other unit or property owners, the documents governing the management of the condominium units and the state and local laws applicable to condominium units must be considered. In addition, in the event of a casualty with respect to a condominium, due to the possible existence of multiple loss payees on any insurance policy covering such property, there could be a delay in the allocation of related insurance proceeds, if any. Consequently, servicing and realizing upon the collateral described above could subject the certificateholders to a greater delay, expense and risk than with respect to a mortgage loan secured by a commercial property that is not a condominium unit.
Certain condominium declarations and/or local laws provide for the withdrawal of a property from a condominium structure under certain circumstances. For example, the New York Condominium Act provides for a withdrawal of the property from a condominium structure by vote of 80% of unit owners. If the condominium is terminated, the building will be subject to an action for partition by any unit owner or lienor as if owned in common. This could cause an early and unanticipated prepayment of the mortgage loan. We cannot assure you that the proceeds from partition would be sufficient to satisfy borrower’s obligations under the mortgage loan. See also “—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” for certain risks relating to use restrictions imposed pursuant to condominium declarations or other condominium especially in a situation where the mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium building.
A condominium regime can also be established with respect to land, as an alternative to land subdivision in those jurisdictions where it is so permitted. In such circumstances, the condominium board’s responsibilities are typically limited to matters such as landscaping and maintenance of common areas, including private roadways, while individual unit owners have responsibility for the buildings constructed on their respective land units. Likewise, in land condominium regimes, individual unit owners would typically have responsibility for property insurance, although the condominium board might maintain liability insurance for the common areas. Accordingly, while some attributes of a building condominium form are shared by a land condominium, the latter would have a more limited scope of board responsibilities and shared costs.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Condominium Interests”.
Operation of a Mortgaged Property Depends on the Property Manager’s Performance
The successful operation of a real estate project depends upon the property manager’s performance and viability. The property manager is responsible for:
● | responding to changes in the local market; |
● | planning and implementing the rental structure; |
● | operating the property and providing building services; |
86
● | managing operating expenses; and |
● | assuring that maintenance and capital improvements are carried out in a timely fashion. |
Properties deriving revenues primarily from short term sources, such as hotel guests or short term or month to month leases, are generally more management intensive than properties leased to creditworthy tenants under long term leases.
Certain of the mortgaged properties will be managed by affiliates of the related borrower. If a mortgage loan is in default or undergoing special servicing, such relationship could disrupt the management of the related mortgaged property, which may adversely affect cash flow. However, the related mortgage loans will generally permit, in the case of mortgaged properties managed by borrower affiliates, the lender to remove the related property manager upon the occurrence of an event of default under the related mortgage loan beyond applicable cure periods (or, in some cases, in the event of a foreclosure following such default), and in some cases a decline in cash flow below a specified level or the failure to satisfy some other specified performance trigger.
Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses
The effect of mortgage pool loan losses will be more severe if the losses relate to mortgage loans that account for a disproportionately large percentage of the pool’s aggregate principal balance. As mortgage loans pay down or properties are released, the remaining certificateholders may face a higher risk with respect to the diversity of property types and property characteristics and with respect to the number of borrowers.
See the tables titled “Remaining Term to Maturity/ARD in Months” in Annex A-2 for a stratification of the remaining terms to maturity of the mortgage loans. Because principal on the certificates is payable in sequential order of payment priority, and a class receives principal only after the preceding class(es) have been paid in full, classes that have a lower sequential priority are more likely to face these types of risks of concentration than classes with a higher sequential priority.
Several of the mortgage loans have cut-off date balances that are substantially higher than the average cut-off date balance. In general, concentrations in mortgage loans with larger-than-average balances can result in losses that are more severe, relative to the size of the mortgage loan pool, than would be the case if the aggregate balance of the mortgage loan pool were more evenly distributed.
A concentration of mortgage loans secured by the same mortgaged property types can increase the risk that a decline in a particular industry or business would have a disproportionately large impact on the pool of mortgage loans. Mortgaged property types representing more than 5.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (based on allocated loan amount) are office, retail, industrial, multifamily, mixed use and hospitality. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Property Types” for information on the types of mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans in the mortgage pool.
Repayments by borrowers and the market value of the related mortgaged properties could be affected by economic conditions generally or specific to particular geographic areas or regions of the United States, and concentrations of mortgaged properties in particular geographic areas may increase the risk that conditions in the real estate market where the
87
mortgaged property is located, or other adverse economic or other developments or natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods, forest fires, tornadoes or hurricanes or changes in governmental rules or fiscal policies) affecting a particular region of the country, could increase the frequency and severity of losses on mortgage loans secured by those mortgaged properties. As a result, areas affected by such events may experience disruptions in travel, transportation and tourism, loss of jobs, an overall decrease in consumer activity, or a decline in real estate-related investments. We cannot assure you that the economies in such impacted areas will recover sufficiently to support income-producing real estate at pre-event levels or that the costs of the related clean-up will not have a material adverse effect on the local or national economy. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Geographic Concentrations”. We cannot assure you that any hurricane damage would be covered by insurance.
Mortgaged properties securing 5.0% or more of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (based on allocated loan amount) are located in California, Texas, New York, Indiana and Massachusetts. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Geographic Concentrations”.
Some of the mortgaged properties are located in areas that, based on low population density, poor economic demographics (such as higher than average unemployment rates, lower than average annual household income and/or overall loss of jobs) and/or negative trends in such regards, would be considered secondary or tertiary markets.
A concentration of mortgage loans with the same borrower or related borrowers also can pose increased risks, such as:
● | if a borrower that owns or controls several properties (whether or not all of them secure mortgage loans in the mortgage pool) experiences financial difficulty at one such property, it could defer maintenance at a mortgaged property or debt service payments on the related mortgage loan in order to satisfy current expenses with respect to the first property or, alternatively, it could direct leasing activity in ways that are adverse to a mortgaged property; |
● | a borrower could also attempt to avert foreclosure by filing a bankruptcy petition that might have the effect of interrupting debt service payments on the mortgage loans in the mortgage pool secured by that borrower’s mortgaged properties (subject to the master servicer’s and the trustee’s obligation to make advances for monthly payments) for an indefinite period; and |
● | mortgaged properties owned by the same borrower or related borrowers are likely to have common management, common general partners and/or common managing members, thereby increasing the risk that financial or other difficulties experienced by such related parties could have a greater impact on the pool of mortgage loans. See “—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans” below. |
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics” for information on the composition of the mortgage pool by property type and geographic distribution and loan concentration.
88
Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses
The issuing entity could become liable for a material adverse environmental condition at an underlying mortgaged property. Any such potential liability could reduce or delay payments on the offered certificates.
Each of the mortgaged properties was either (i) subject to environmental site assessments prior to the time of origination of the related mortgage loan (or, in certain limited cases, after origination) including Phase I environmental site assessments or updates of previously performed Phase I environmental site assessments, or (ii) subject to a secured creditor environmental insurance policy or other environmental insurance policy. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations”.
We cannot assure you that the environmental assessments revealed all existing or potential environmental risks or that all adverse environmental conditions have been or will be completely abated or remediated or that any reserves, insurance or operations and maintenance plans will be sufficient to remediate the environmental conditions. Moreover, we cannot assure you that:
● | future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability; or |
● | the current environmental condition of the mortgaged properties will not be adversely affected by tenants or by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of the mortgaged properties (such as underground storage tanks). |
We cannot assure you that with respect to any mortgaged property any remediation plan or any projected remedial costs or time is accurate or sufficient to complete the remediation objectives, or that no additional contamination requiring environmental investigation or remediation will be discovered on any mortgaged property. Likewise, all environmental policies naming the lender as named insured cover certain risks or events specifically identified in the policy, but the coverage is limited by its terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions, and does not purport to cover all environmental conditions whatsoever affecting the applicable mortgaged property, and we cannot assure you that any environmental conditions currently known, suspected, or unknown and discovered in the future will be covered by the terms of the policy.
Before the trustee or the special servicer, as applicable, acquires title to a mortgaged property on behalf of the issuing entity or assumes operation of the property, it will be required to obtain an environmental assessment of such mortgaged property, or rely on a recent environmental assessment. This requirement is intended to mitigate the risk that the issuing entity will become liable under any environmental law. There is accordingly some risk that the mortgaged property will decline in value while this assessment is being obtained or remedial action is being taken. Moreover, we cannot assure you that this requirement will effectively insulate the issuing entity from potential liability under environmental laws. Any such potential liability could reduce or delay distributions to certificateholders.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations” for additional information on environmental conditions at mortgaged properties securing certain mortgage loans in the issuing entity. See also representation and warranty no. 40 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
89
See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—UBS AG, New York Branch—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; “—Société Générale—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis”; “—CIBC Inc.—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; and “—Barclays Bank PLC—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”.
See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Environmental Considerations”.
Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties
Certain of the mortgaged properties are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment, expansion or renovation. In addition, the related borrower may be permitted under the related mortgage loan documents, at its option and cost but subject to certain conditions, to undertake future construction, renovation or alterations of the mortgaged property. To the extent applicable, we cannot assure you that any escrow or reserve collected, if any, will be sufficient to complete the current renovation or be otherwise sufficient to satisfy any tenant improvement expenses at a mortgaged property. Failure to complete those planned improvements may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow at the mortgaged property and the related borrower’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the mortgage loan documents.
Certain of the hotel properties securing the mortgage loans are currently undergoing or are scheduled to undergo renovations or property improvement plans. In some circumstances, these renovations or property improvement plans may necessitate taking a portion of the available guest rooms temporarily offline, temporarily decreasing the number of available rooms and the revenue generating capacity of the related hotel property. In other cases, these renovations may involve renovations of common spaces or external features of the related hotel property, which may cause disruptions or otherwise decrease the attractiveness of the related hotel property to potential guests. These property improvement plans may be required under the related franchise or management agreement and a failure to timely complete them may result in a termination or expiration of a franchise or management agreement and may be an event of default under the related mortgage loan.
Certain of the properties securing the mortgage loans may currently be undergoing or are scheduled to undergo renovations or property expansions. Such renovations or expansions may be required under tenant leases and a failure to timely complete such renovations or expansions may result in a termination of such lease and may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow at the mortgaged property and the related borrower’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the mortgage loan documents.
We cannot assure you that current or planned redevelopment, expansion or renovation will be completed at all, that such redevelopment, expansion or renovation will be completed in the time frame contemplated, or that, when and if such redevelopment, expansion or renovation is completed, such redevelopment, expansion or renovation will improve the operations at, or increase the value of, the related mortgaged property. Failure of any of the foregoing to occur could have a material negative impact on the related mortgaged property, which could affect the ability of the related borrower to repay the related mortgage loan.
90
In the event the related borrower fails to pay the costs for work completed or material delivered in connection with such ongoing redevelopment, expansion or renovation, the portion of the mortgaged property on which there are renovations may be subject to mechanic’s or materialmen’s liens that may be senior to the lien of the related mortgage loan.
The existence of construction or renovation at a mortgaged property may take rental units or rooms or leasable space “off-line” or otherwise make space unavailable for rental, impair access or traffic at or near the mortgaged property, or, in general, make that mortgaged property less attractive to tenants or their customers, and accordingly could have a negative effect on net operating income. In addition, any such construction or renovation at a mortgaged property may temporarily interfere with the use and operation of any portion of such mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion” for information regarding mortgaged properties which are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment, expansion or renovation. See also Annex A-3 for additional information on redevelopment, renovation and expansion at the mortgaged properties securing the 15 largest mortgage loans.
Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses
Certain mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans may have specialty use tenants and may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable for any reason.
For example, retail, mixed use or office properties may have theater tenants. Properties with theater tenants are exposed to certain unique risks. Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of a theater. In addition, decreasing attendance at a theater could adversely affect revenue of the theater, which may, in turn, cause the tenant to experience financial difficulties, resulting in downgrades in their credit ratings and, in certain cases, bankruptcy filings. In addition, because of unique construction requirements of theaters, any vacant theater space would not easily be converted to other uses.
Retail, mixed use or office properties may also have health clubs as tenants. Several factors may adversely affect the value and successful operation of a health club, including:
● | the physical attributes of the health club (e.g., its age, appearance and layout); |
● | the reputation, safety, convenience and attractiveness of the property to users; |
● | management’s ability to control membership growth and attrition; |
● | competition in the tenant’s marketplace from other health clubs and alternatives to health clubs; and |
● | adverse changes in economic and social conditions and demographic changes (e.g., population decreases or changes in average age or income), which may result in decreased demand. |
In addition, there may be significant costs associated with changing consumer preferences (e.g., multipurpose clubs from single-purpose clubs or varieties of equipment, classes, services and amenities). In addition, health clubs may not be readily convertible to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable for any reason. The liquidation value of any such health club consequently may be less than would be the case if the property were readily adaptable to changing consumer preferences for other uses.
91
Certain retail, mixed use or office properties may be partially comprised of a parking garage, or certain properties may be entirely comprised of a parking garage. Parking garages and parking lots present risks not associated with other properties. The primary source of income for parking lots and garages is the rental fees charged for parking spaces.
Factors affecting the success of a parking lot or garage include:
● | the number of rentable parking spaces and rates charged; |
● | the location of the lot or garage and, in particular, its proximity to places where large numbers of people work, shop or live; |
● | the amount of alternative parking spaces in the area; |
● | the availability of mass transit; and |
● | the perceptions of the safety, convenience and services of the lot or garage. |
In instances where a parking garage does not have a long-term leasing arrangement with a parking lessee, but rather relies on individual short-term (i.e., daily or weekly) parking tenants for parking revenues, variations in any or all of the foregoing factors can result in increased volatility in the net operating income for such parking garage.
Aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of a parking garage facility. Site characteristics that are valuable to a parking garage facility include location, clear ceiling heights, column spacing, zoning restrictions, number of spaces and overall functionality and accessibility.
In addition, because of the unique construction requirements of many parking garages and because a parking lot is often vacant paved land without any structure, a vacant parking garage facility or parking lot may not be easily converted to other uses.
Mortgaged properties may have other specialty use tenants, such as retail banks, medical and dental offices, gas stations, data centers, urgent care facilities, daycare centers and/or restaurants, as part of the mortgaged property.
In the case of specialty use tenants such as restaurants and theaters, aspects of building site design and adaptability affect the value of such properties and other retailers at the mortgaged property. Decreasing patronage at such properties could adversely affect revenue of the property, which may, in turn, cause the tenants to experience financial difficulties, resulting in downgrades in their credit ratings, lease defaults and, in certain cases, bankruptcy filings. See “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” above. Additionally, receipts at such properties are also affected not only by objective factors but by subjective factors. For instance, restaurant receipts are affected by such varied influences as the current personal income levels in the community, an individual consumer’s preference for type of food, style of dining and restaurant atmosphere, the perceived popularity of the restaurant, food safety concerns related to personal health with the handling of food items at the restaurant or by food suppliers and the actions and/or behaviors of staff and management and level of service to the customers. In addition, because of unique construction requirements of such properties, any vacant space would not easily be converted to other uses.
Retail bank branches are specialty use tenants that are often outfitted with vaults, teller counters and other customary installations and equipment that may have required
92
significant capital expenditures to install. The ability to lease these types of properties may be difficult due to the added cost and time to retrofitting the property to allow for other uses.
Mortgaged properties with specialty use tenants may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason due to their unique construction requirements. In addition, converting commercial properties to alternate uses generally requires substantial capital expenditures and could result in a significant adverse effect on, or interruption of, the revenues generated by such properties.
In addition, a mortgaged property may not be readily convertible due to restrictive covenants related to such mortgaged property, including in the case of mortgaged properties that are subject to a condominium regime or subject to a ground lease, the use and other restrictions imposed by the condominium declaration and other related documents, especially in a situation where a mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium regime. See “—Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements” above.
Some of the mortgaged properties may be part of tax-reduction programs that apply only if the mortgaged properties are used for certain purposes. Such properties may be restricted from being converted to alternative uses because of such restrictions.
Some of the mortgaged properties have government tenants or other tenants which may have space that was “built to suit” that particular tenant’s uses and needs. For example, a government tenant may require enhanced security features that required additional construction or renovation costs and for which the related tenant may pay above market rent. However, such enhanced features may not be necessary for a new tenant (and such new tenant may not be willing to pay the higher rent associated with such features). While a government office building or government leased space may be usable as a regular office building or tenant space, the rents that may be collected in the event the government tenant does not renew its lease may be significantly lower than the rent currently collected.
Additionally, zoning, historical preservation or other restrictions also may prevent alternative uses. See “—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” below.
Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions
Certain of the mortgaged properties may not comply with current zoning laws, including use, density, parking, height, landscaping, open space and set back requirements, due to changes in zoning requirements after such mortgaged properties were constructed. These properties, as well as those for which variances or special permits were issued or for which non-conformity with current zoning laws is otherwise permitted, are considered to be a “legal non-conforming use” and/or the improvements are considered to be “legal non-conforming structures”. This means that the borrower is not required to alter its structure to comply with the existing or new law; however, the borrower may not be able to rebuild the premises “as-is” in the event of a substantial casualty loss. This may adversely affect the cash flow of the property following the loss. If a substantial casualty were to occur, we cannot assure you that insurance proceeds would be available to pay the mortgage loan in full. In addition, if a non-conforming use were to be discontinued and/or the property were repaired or restored in conformity with the current law, the value of the property or the revenue-producing potential of the property may not be equal to that before the casualty.
93
In some cases, the related borrower has obtained law and ordinance insurance to cover additional costs that result from rebuilding the mortgaged property in accordance with current zoning requirements, including, within the policy’s limitations, demolition costs, increased costs of construction due to code compliance and loss of value to undamaged improvements resulting from the application of zoning laws. However, if as a result of the applicable zoning laws the rebuilt improvements are smaller or less attractive to tenants than the original improvements, you should not assume that the resulting loss in income will be covered by law and ordinance insurance. Zoning protection insurance, if obtained, will generally reimburse the lender for the difference between (i) the mortgage loan balance on the date of damage loss to the mortgaged property from an insured peril and (ii) the total insurance proceeds at the time of the damage to the mortgaged property if such mortgaged property cannot be rebuilt to its former use due to new zoning ordinances.
In addition, certain of the mortgaged properties that do not conform to current zoning laws may not be “legal non-conforming uses” or “legal non-conforming structures”, thus constituting a zoning violation. The failure of a mortgaged property to comply with zoning laws or to be a “legal non-conforming use” or “legal non-conforming structure” may adversely affect the market value of the mortgaged property or the borrower’s ability to continue to use it in the manner it is currently being used or may necessitate material additional expenditures to remedy non-conformities. See representation and warranty no. 24 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1). Further, current uses may not in all instances have all necessary licenses and permits, which may subject the borrower or tenant to penalties or disruption of the related use. See representation and warranty no. 25 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
The limited availability of zoning information and/or extent of zoning diligence may also present risks. Zoning information contained in appraisals may be based on limited investigation, and zoning comfort letters obtained from jurisdictions, while based on available records, do not customarily involve any contemporaneous site inspection. The extent of zoning diligence will also be determined based on perceived risk and the cost and benefit of obtaining additional information. Even if law and ordinance insurance is required to mitigate rebuilding-related risks, we cannot assure you that other risks related to material zoning violations will have been identified under such circumstances, and that appropriate borrower covenants or other structural mitigants will have been required as a result.
In addition, certain of the mortgaged properties may be subject to certain use restrictions and/or operational requirements imposed pursuant to development agreements, regulatory agreements, ground leases, restrictive covenants, environmental restrictions, reciprocal easement agreements or operating agreements or historical landmark designations or, in the case of those mortgaged properties that are condominiums, condominium declarations or other condominium use restrictions or regulations, especially in a situation where the mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium building. Such use restrictions could include, for example, limitations on the character of the improvements or the properties, limitations affecting noise and parking requirements, among other things, and limitations on the borrowers’ right to operate certain types of facilities within a prescribed radius. These limitations impose upon the borrower stricter requirements with respect to repairs and alterations, including following a casualty loss. These limitations could adversely affect the ability of the related borrower to lease the mortgaged property on favorable terms, thus adversely affecting the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the related mortgage loan. In addition, any alteration,
94
reconstruction, demolition, or new construction affecting a mortgaged property designated a historical landmark may require prior approval. Any such approval process, even if successful, could delay any redevelopment or alteration of a related property. The liquidation value of such property, to the extent subject to limitations of the kind described above or other limitations on convertibility of use, may be substantially less than would be the case if such property was readily adaptable to other uses or redevelopment. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Use Restrictions” for examples of mortgaged properties that are subject to restrictions relating to the use of the mortgaged properties.
Risks Relating to Inspections of Properties
Licensed engineers or consultants inspected the mortgaged properties at or about the time of the origination of the mortgage loans to assess items such as structural integrity of the buildings and other improvements on the mortgaged property, including exterior walls, roofing, interior construction, mechanical and electrical systems and general condition of the site, buildings and other improvements. However, we cannot assure you that all conditions requiring repair or replacement were identified. No additional property inspections were conducted in connection with the issuance of the offered certificates.
Risks Relating to Costs of Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations
A borrower may be required to incur costs to comply with various existing and future federal, state or local laws and regulations applicable to the related mortgaged property, for example, zoning laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, which requires all public accommodations to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by persons with disabilities. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Americans with Disabilities Act”. The expenditure of these costs or the imposition of injunctive relief, penalties or fines in connection with the borrower’s noncompliance could negatively impact the borrower’s cash flow and, consequently, its ability to pay its mortgage loan.
Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate
Although the mortgaged properties are required to be insured, or self-insured by a sole tenant of a related building or group of buildings, against certain risks, there is a possibility of casualty loss with respect to the mortgaged properties for which insurance proceeds may not be adequate or which may result from risks not covered by insurance.
In addition, certain types of mortgaged properties, such as manufactured housing and recreational vehicle communities, have few or no insurable buildings or improvements and thus do not have casualty insurance or low limits of casualty insurance in comparison with the related mortgage loan balances.
In addition, hazard insurance policies will typically contain co-insurance clauses that in effect require an insured at all times to carry insurance of a specified percentage, generally 80% to 90%, of the full replacement value of the improvements on the related mortgaged property in order to recover the full amount of any partial loss. As a result, even if insurance coverage is maintained, if the insured’s coverage falls below this specified percentage, those clauses generally provide that the insurer’s liability in the event of partial loss does not exceed the lesser of (1) the replacement cost of the improvements less physical depreciation and (2) that proportion of the loss as the amount of insurance carried bears to the specified percentage of the full replacement cost of those improvements.
95
Certain of the mortgaged properties may be located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zones 3 or 4). See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Geographic Concentrations”.
Furthermore, with respect to certain mortgage loans, the insurable value of the related mortgaged property as of the origination date of the related mortgage loan was lower than the principal balance of the related mortgage loan. In the event of a casualty when a borrower is not required to rebuild or cannot rebuild, we cannot assure you that the insurance required with respect to the related mortgaged property will be sufficient to pay the related mortgage loan in full and there is no “gap” insurance required under such mortgage loan to cover any difference. In those circumstances, a casualty that occurs near the maturity date may result in an extension of the maturity date of the mortgage loan if the special servicer, in accordance with the servicing standard, determines that such extension was in the best interest of certificateholders.
The mortgage loans do not all require flood insurance on the related mortgaged properties unless they are in a flood zone and flood insurance is available and, in certain instances, even where the related mortgaged property was in a flood zone and flood insurance was available, flood insurance was not required.
The National Flood Insurance Program is scheduled to expire March 23, 2018. We cannot assure you if or when the National Flood Insurance Program will be reauthorized by Congress. If the National Flood Insurance Program is not reauthorized, it could have an adverse effect on the value of properties in flood zones or their ability to repair or rebuild after flood damage.
We cannot assure you that the borrowers will in the future be able to comply with requirements to maintain adequate insurance with respect to the mortgaged properties, and any uninsured loss could have a material adverse impact on the amount available to make payments on the related mortgage loan, and consequently, the offered certificates. As with all real estate, if reconstruction (for example, following fire or other casualty) or any major repair or improvement is required to the damaged property, changes in laws and governmental regulations may be applicable and may materially affect the cost to, or ability of, the borrowers to effect such reconstruction, major repair or improvement. As a result, the amount realized with respect to the mortgaged properties, and the amount available to make payments on the related mortgage loan, and consequently, the offered certificates, could be reduced. In addition, we cannot assure you that the amount of insurance required or provided would be sufficient to cover damages caused by any casualty, or that such insurance will be available in the future at commercially reasonable rates. See representation and warranty no. 16 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
Inadequacy of Title Insurers May Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates
Title insurance for a mortgaged property generally insures a lender against risks relating to a lender not having a first lien with respect to a mortgaged property, and in some cases can insure a lender against specific other risks. The protection afforded by title insurance depends on the ability of the title insurer to pay claims made upon it. We cannot assure you that with respect to any mortgage loan:
● | a title insurer will have the ability to pay title insurance claims made upon it; |
96
● | the title insurer will maintain its present financial strength; or |
● | a title insurer will not contest claims made upon it. |
Certain of the mortgaged properties are either completing initial construction or undergoing renovation or redevelopment. Under such circumstances, there may be limitations to the amount of coverage or other exceptions to coverage that could adversely affect the issuing entity if losses are suffered.
Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties
The occurrence or the possibility of terrorist attacks could (1) lead to damage to one or more of the mortgaged properties if any terrorist attacks occur or (2) result in higher costs for security and insurance premiums or diminish the availability of insurance coverage for losses related to terrorist attacks, particularly for large properties, which could adversely affect the cash flow at those mortgaged properties.
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area, all forms of insurance were impacted, particularly from a cost and availability perspective, including comprehensive general liability and business interruption or rent loss insurance policies required by typical mortgage loans. To give time for private markets to develop a pricing mechanism for terrorism risk and to build capacity to absorb future losses that may occur due to terrorism, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 was enacted on November 26, 2002, establishing the Terrorism Insurance Program. The Terrorism Insurance Program was extended through December 31, 2014 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 and was subsequently reauthorized on January 12, 2015 for a period of six years through December 31, 2020 pursuant to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“TRIPRA”).
The Terrorism Insurance Program requires insurance carriers to provide terrorism coverage in their basic “all-risk” policies. Any commercial property and casualty terrorism insurance exclusion that was in force on November 26, 2002 is automatically void to the extent that it excluded losses that would otherwise be insured losses. Any state approval of those types of exclusions in force on November 26, 2002 is also void.
Under the Terrorism Insurance Program, the federal government shares in the risk of losses occurring within the United States resulting from acts committed in an effort to influence or coerce United States civilians or the United States government. The federal share of compensation for insured losses of an insurer equals 82% in 2018 (subject to annual 1% decreases thereafter until such percentage equals 80%) of the portion of such insured losses that exceed a deductible equal to 20% of the value of the insurer’s direct earned premiums over the calendar year immediately preceding that program year. Federal compensation in any program year is capped at $100 billion (with insurers being liable for any amount that exceeds such cap), and no compensation is payable with respect to a terrorist act unless the aggregate industry losses relating to such act exceed $160 million in 2018 (subject to annual $20 million increases thereafter until such threshold equals $200 million). The Terrorism Insurance Program does not cover nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. Unless a borrower obtains separate coverage for events that do not meet the thresholds or other requirements above, such events will not be covered.
If the Terrorism Insurance Program is not reenacted after its expiration in 2020, premiums for terrorism insurance coverage will likely increase and the terms of such insurance policies may be materially amended to increase stated exclusions or to otherwise effectively decrease the scope of coverage available (perhaps to the point where it is
97
effectively not available). In addition, to the extent that any insurance policies contain “sunset clauses” (i.e., clauses that void terrorism coverage if the federal insurance backstop program is not renewed), such policies may cease to provide terrorism insurance upon the expiration of the Terrorism Insurance Program. We cannot assure you that the Terrorism Insurance Program or any successor program will create any long term changes in the availability and cost of such insurance. Moreover, future legislation, including regulations expected to be adopted by the Treasury Department pursuant to TRIPRA, may have a material effect on the availability of federal assistance in the terrorism insurance market. To the extent that uninsured or underinsured casualty losses occur with respect to the related mortgaged properties, losses on the mortgage loans may result. In addition, the failure to maintain such terrorism insurance may constitute a default under the related mortgage loan.
Some of the mortgage loans do not require the related borrower to maintain terrorism insurance. In addition, most of the mortgage loans contain limitations on the related borrower’s obligation to obtain terrorism insurance, such as (i) waiving the requirement that such borrower maintain terrorism insurance if such insurance is not available at commercially reasonable rates, (ii) providing that the related borrower is not required to spend in excess of a specified dollar amount (or in some cases, a specified multiple of what is spent on other insurance) in order to obtain such terrorism insurance, (iii) requiring coverage only for as long as the TRIPRA is in effect, or (iv) requiring coverage only for losses arising from domestic acts of terrorism or from terrorist acts certified by the federal government as “acts of terrorism” under the TRIPRA. See Annex A-3 for a summary of the terrorism insurance requirements under each of the 15 largest mortgage loans. See representation and warranty no. 29 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
We cannot assure you that all of the mortgaged properties will be insured against the risks of terrorism and similar acts. As a result of any of the foregoing, the amount available to make distributions on your certificates could be reduced.
Other mortgaged properties securing mortgage loans may also be insured under a blanket policy or self-insured or insured by a sole tenant. See “—Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance” below.
Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance
Certain of the mortgaged properties are covered by blanket insurance policies, which also cover other properties of the related borrower or its affiliates (including certain properties in close proximity to the mortgaged properties). In the event that such policies are drawn on to cover losses on such other properties, the amount of insurance coverage available under such policies would thereby be reduced and could be insufficient to cover each mortgaged property’s insurable risks.
Certain mortgaged properties may also be insured or self-insured by a sole or significant tenant, as further described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Insurance Considerations”. We cannot assure you that any insurance obtained by a sole or significant tenant will be adequate or that such sole or significant tenant will comply with any requirements to maintain adequate insurance. Additionally, to the extent that insurance coverage relies on self-insurance, there is a risk that the “insurer” will not be willing or have the financial ability to satisfy a claim if a loss occurs.
98
Additionally, the risks related to blanket or self-insurance may be aggravated if the mortgage loans that allow such coverage are part of a group of mortgage loans with related borrowers, and some or all of the related mortgaged properties are covered under the same self-insurance or blanket insurance policy, which may also cover other properties owned by affiliates of such borrowers.
Condemnation of a Mortgaged Property May Adversely Affect Distributions on Certificates
From time to time, there may be condemnations pending or threatened against one or more of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. The proceeds payable in connection with a total condemnation may not be sufficient to restore the related mortgaged property or to satisfy the remaining indebtedness of the related mortgage loan. The occurrence of a partial condemnation may have a material adverse effect on the continued use of, or income generated by, the affected mortgaged property. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the occurrence of any condemnation will not have a negative impact upon distributions on your offered certificates.
Limited Information Causes Uncertainty
Historical Information
Some of the mortgage loans that we intend to include in the issuing entity are secured in whole or in part by mortgaged properties for which limited or no historical operating information is available. As a result, you may find it difficult to analyze the historical performance of those mortgaged properties.
A mortgaged property may lack prior operating history or historical financial information because it is newly constructed or renovated, it is a recent acquisition by the related borrower or it is a single-tenant property that is subject to a triple-net lease. In addition, a tenant’s lease may contain confidentiality provisions that restrict the sponsors’ access to or disclosure of such tenant’s financial information. The underwritten net cash flows and underwritten net operating income for such mortgaged properties are derived principally from current rent rolls or tenant leases and historical expenses, adjusted to account for inflation, significant occupancy increases and a market rate management fee. In some cases, underwritten net cash flows and underwritten net operating income for mortgaged properties are based all or in part on leases (or letters of intent) that are not yet in place (and may still be under negotiation) or on tenants that may have signed a lease (or letter of intent), or lease amendment expanding the leased space, but are not yet in occupancy and/or paying rent), which present certain risks described in “—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Flawed Assumptions” below.
See Annex A-1 for certain historical financial information relating to the mortgaged properties, including net operating income for the most recent reporting period and prior three (3) calendar years, to the extent available.
Ongoing Information
The primary source of ongoing information regarding the offered certificates, including information regarding the status of the related mortgage loans and any credit support for the offered certificates, will be the periodic reports delivered to you. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. We cannot assure you that any additional ongoing information regarding the offered certificates will be available through any other source. The limited nature of the available information in
99
respect of the offered certificates may adversely affect their liquidity, even if a secondary market for the offered certificates does develop.
We are not aware of any source through which pricing information regarding the offered certificates will be generally available on an ongoing basis or on any particular date.
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Flawed Assumptions
As described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”, underwritten net cash flow generally includes cash flow (including any cash flow from master leases) adjusted based on a number of assumptions used by the sponsors. We make no representation that the underwritten net cash flow set forth in this prospectus as of the cut-off date or any other date represents actual future net cash flows. For example, with respect to certain mortgage loans included in the issuing entity, the occupancy of the related mortgaged property reflects tenants that (i) may not have yet actually executed leases (but have in some instances signed letters of intent), (ii) have signed leases but have not yet taken occupancy and/or are not paying full contractual rent, (iii) are seeking or may in the future seek to sublet all or a portion of their respective spaces, (iv) are “dark” tenants but paying rent, or (v) are affiliates of the related borrower and are leasing space pursuant to a master lease or a space lease. Similarly, with respect to certain mortgage loans included in the issuing entity, the underwritten net cash flow may be based on certain tenants that have not yet executed leases or that have signed leases but are not yet in place and/or are not yet paying rent, or have a signed lease or lease amendment expanding the leased space, but are not yet in occupancy of all or a portion of their space and/or paying rent, or may assume that future contractual rent steps (during some or all of the remaining term of a lease) have occurred. In many cases, co-tenancy provisions were assumed to be satisfied and vacant space was assumed to be occupied and space that was due to expire was assumed to have been re-let, in each case at market rates that may have exceeded current rent. You should review these and other similar assumptions and make your own determination of the appropriate assumptions to be used in determining underwritten net cash flow.
In addition, underwritten or adjusted cash flows, by their nature, are speculative and are based upon certain assumptions and projections. The failure of these assumptions or projections in whole or in part could cause the underwritten net operating income (calculated as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”) to vary substantially from the actual net operating income of a mortgaged property.
In the event of the inaccuracy of any assumptions or projections used in connection with the calculation of underwritten net cash flow, the actual net cash flow could be significantly different (and, in some cases, may be materially less) than the underwritten net cash flow presented in this prospectus, and this would change other numerical information presented in this prospectus based on or derived from the underwritten net cash flow, such as the debt service coverage ratios or debt yield presented in this prospectus. We cannot assure you that any such assumptions or projections made with respect to any mortgaged property will, in fact, be consistent with that mortgaged property’s actual performance.
Frequent and Early Occurrence of Borrower Delinquencies and Defaults May Adversely Affect Your Investment
If you calculate the anticipated yield of your offered certificates based on a rate of default or amount of losses lower than that actually experienced on the mortgage loans and those additional losses result in a reduction of the total distributions on, or the certificate
100
balance of, your offered certificates, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected and could be negative under certain extreme scenarios. The timing of any loss on a liquidated mortgage loan that results in a reduction of the total distributions on or the certificate balance of your offered certificates will also affect the actual yield to maturity of your offered certificates, even if the rate of defaults and severity of losses are consistent with your expectations. In general, the earlier a loss is borne by you, the greater the effect on your yield to maturity.
Delinquencies on the mortgage loans, if the delinquent amounts are not advanced, may result in shortfalls in distributions of interest and/or principal to the holders of the offered certificates for the current month. Furthermore, no interest will accrue on this shortfall during the period of time that the payment is delinquent. Additionally, in instances where the principal portion of any balloon payment scheduled with respect to a mortgage loan is collected by the master servicer following the end of the related collection period, no portion of the principal received on such payment will be passed through for distribution to the certificateholders until the subsequent distribution date, which may result in shortfalls in distributions of interest to the holders of the offered certificates in the following month. Furthermore, in such instances no provision is made for the master servicer or any other party to cover any such interest shortfalls that may occur as a result. In addition, if interest and/or principal advances and/or servicing advances are made with respect to a mortgage loan after a default and the related mortgage loan is thereafter worked out under terms that do not provide for the repayment of those advances in full at the time of the workout, then any reimbursements of those advances prior to the actual collection of the amount for which the advance was made may also result in shortfalls in distributions of principal to the holders of the offered certificates with certificate balances for the current month. Even if losses on the mortgage loans are not allocated to a particular class of offered certificates with certificate balances, the losses may affect the weighted average life and yield to maturity of that class of offered certificates. In the case of any material monetary or material non-monetary default, the special servicer may accelerate the maturity of the related mortgage loan, which could result in an acceleration of principal distributions to the certificateholders. The special servicer may also extend or modify a mortgage loan, which could result in a substantial delay in principal distributions to the certificateholders. In addition, losses on the mortgage loans, even if not allocated to a class of offered certificates with certificate balances, may result in a higher percentage ownership interest evidenced by those offered certificates in the remaining mortgage loans than would otherwise have resulted absent the loss. The consequent effect on the weighted average life and yield to maturity of the offered certificates will depend upon the characteristics of those remaining mortgage loans in the trust fund.
The Mortgage Loans Have Not Been Reviewed or Re-Underwritten by Us; Some Mortgage Loans May Not Have Complied With Another Originator’s Underwriting Criteria
Although the sponsors have conducted a review of the mortgage loans to be sold to us for this securitization transaction, we, as the depositor for this securitization transaction, have neither originated the mortgage loans nor conducted a review or re-underwriting of the mortgage loans. Instead, we have relied on the representations and warranties made by the applicable sponsors and the remedies for breach of a representation and warranty as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements” and each sponsor’s description of its underwriting criteria described under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—UBS AG, New York Branch—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; “—Société Générale—Société Générale’s
101
Underwriting Standards”; “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis”; “—CIBC Inc.—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; and “—Barclays Bank PLC—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”. A description of the review conducted by each sponsor for this securitization transaction is set forth under “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—UBS AG, New York Branch—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; “—Société Générale—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis”; “—CIBC Inc.—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; and “—Barclays Bank PLC—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”.
The representations and warranties made by the sponsors may not cover all of the matters that one would review in underwriting a mortgage loan and you should not view them as a substitute for re-underwriting the mortgage loans. Furthermore, these representations and warranties in some respects represent an allocation of risk rather than a confirmed description of the mortgage loans. If we had re-underwritten the mortgage loans, it is possible that the re-underwriting process may have revealed problems with a mortgage loan not covered by a representation or warranty or may have revealed inaccuracies in the representations and warranties. See “—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan” below, and “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
In addition, we cannot assure you that all of the mortgage loans would have complied with the underwriting criteria of the other originators or, accordingly, that each originator would have made the same decision to originate every mortgage loan included in the issuing entity or, if they did decide to originate an unrelated mortgage loan, that they would have been underwritten on the same terms and conditions.
As a result of the foregoing, you are advised and encouraged to make your own investment decision based on a careful review of the information set forth in this prospectus and your own view of the mortgage pool.
Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of this Pool
As a result of the distinct nature of each pool of commercial mortgage loans, and the separate mortgage loans within the pool, this prospectus does not include disclosure concerning the delinquency and loss experience of static pools of periodic originations by any sponsor of assets of the type to be securitized (known as “static pool data”). In particular, static pool data showing a low level of delinquencies and defaults would not be indicative of the performance of this pool or any other pools of mortgage loans originated by the same sponsor or sponsors.
While there may be certain common factors affecting the performance and value of income-producing real properties in general, those factors do not apply equally to all income-producing real properties and, in many cases, there are unique factors that will affect the performance and/or value of a particular income-producing real property. Moreover, the effect of a given factor on a particular real property will depend on a number of variables, including but not limited to property type, geographic location, competition, sponsorship and other characteristics of the property and the related commercial mortgage
102
loan. Each income-producing real property represents a separate and distinct business venture and, as a result, each of the mortgage loans requires a unique underwriting analysis. Furthermore, economic and other conditions affecting real properties, whether worldwide, national, regional or local, vary over time. The performance of a pool of mortgage loans originated and outstanding under a given set of economic conditions may vary significantly from the performance of an otherwise comparable mortgage pool originated and outstanding under a different set of economic conditions.
Therefore, you should evaluate this offering on the basis of the information set forth in this prospectus with respect to the mortgage loans, and not on the basis of the performance of other pools of securitized commercial mortgage loans.
Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property
Appraisals were obtained with respect to each of the mortgaged properties at or about the time of origination of the related mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable) or at or around the time of the acquisition of the mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable) by the related sponsor. See Annex A-1 for the dates of the latest appraisals for the mortgaged properties. We have not obtained new appraisals of the mortgaged properties or assigned new valuations to the mortgage loans in connection with the offering of the offered certificates. The market values of the mortgaged properties could have declined since the origination of the related mortgage loans. In addition, in certain cases where a mortgage loan is funding the acquisition of the related mortgaged property or portfolio of mortgaged properties, the purchase price may be less than the related appraised value set forth herein.
In general, appraisals represent the analysis and opinion of qualified appraisers and are not guarantees of present or future value. One appraiser may reach a different conclusion than that of a different appraiser with respect to the same property. The appraisals seek to establish the amount a typically motivated buyer would pay a typically motivated seller and, in certain cases, may have taken into consideration the purchase price paid by the borrower. The amount could be significantly higher than the amount obtained from the sale of a mortgaged property in a distress or liquidation sale.
Information regarding the appraised values of the mortgaged properties (including loan-to-value ratios) presented in this prospectus is not intended to be a representation as to the past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties. For example, in some cases, a borrower or its affiliate may have acquired the related mortgaged property for a price or otherwise for consideration in an amount that is less than the related appraised value specified on Annex A-1, including at a foreclosure sale or through acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Historical operating results of the mortgaged properties used in these appraisals, as adjusted by various assumptions, estimates and subjective judgments on the part of the appraiser, may not be comparable to future operating results. In addition, certain appraisals may be based on extraordinary assumptions, including without limitation, that certain tenants are in-place and paying rent when such tenants have not yet taken occupancy or that certain renovations or property improvement plans have been completed. Additionally, certain appraisals with respect to mortgage loans secured by multiple mortgaged properties may have been conducted on a portfolio basis rather than on an individual property basis, and the sum of the values of the individual properties may be different from (and in some cases may be less than) the appraised value of the aggregate of such properties on a portfolio basis. In addition, other factors may impair the mortgaged properties’ value without affecting their current net operating income, including:
● | changes in governmental regulations, zoning or tax laws; |
103
● | potential environmental or other legal liabilities; |
● | the availability of refinancing; and |
● | changes in interest rate levels. |
In certain cases, appraisals may reflect “as-is” values or values other than “as-is”. However, the appraised value reflected in this prospectus with respect to each mortgaged property, except as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” and/or “—Appraised Value”, reflects only the “as-is” value (or, in certain cases, may reflect the other than “as-is” values as a result of the satisfaction of the related conditions or assumptions or the establishment of reserves estimated to complete the renovations) unless otherwise specified, which values may be based on certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting or increased tenant occupancies. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”.
Additionally, with respect to the appraisals setting forth assumptions, particularly those setting forth extraordinary assumptions, as to the “as-is” values or values other than “as-is”, we cannot assure you that any values shown in this prospectus will be the value of the related mortgaged property at the indicated stabilization date (if applicable) or at maturity or the anticipated repayment date (if any). Any engineering report, site inspection or appraisal represents only the analysis of the individual consultant, engineer or inspector preparing such report at the time of such report, and may not reveal all necessary or desirable repairs, maintenance and capital improvement items. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—UBS AG, New York Branch—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; “—Société Générale—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis”; “—CIBC Inc.—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; and “—Barclays Bank PLC—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes” for additional information regarding the appraisals. We cannot assure you that the information set forth in this prospectus regarding the appraised values or loan-to-value ratios accurately reflects past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties or the amount that would be realized upon a sale of the related mortgaged property.
The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property
The operation and performance of a mortgage loan will depend in part on the identity of the persons or entities who control the borrower and the mortgaged property. The performance of a mortgage loan may be adversely affected if control of a borrower changes, which may occur, for example, by means of transfers of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower, or if the mortgage loan is assigned to and assumed by another person or entity along with a transfer of the property to that person or entity.
Many of the mortgage loans generally place certain restrictions on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, although some have current or permit future mezzanine or subordinate debt. We cannot assure you the ownership of any of the borrowers would not change during the term of the related mortgage loan and result in a material adverse effect on your certificates. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness” and “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—”Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions”.
104
The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks
The borrowers are legal entities rather than individuals. Mortgage loans made to legal entities may entail greater risks of loss than those associated with mortgage loans made to individuals. For example, a legal entity, as opposed to an individual, may be more inclined to seek legal protection from its creditors under the bankruptcy laws. Unlike individuals involved in bankruptcies, most entities generally, but not in all cases, do not have personal assets and creditworthiness at stake.
The terms of certain of the mortgage loans require that the borrowers be single-purpose entities and, in most cases, such borrowers’ organizational documents or the terms of the mortgage loans limit their activities to the ownership of only the related mortgaged property or mortgaged properties and limit the borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness. Such provisions are designed to mitigate the possibility that the borrower’s financial condition would be adversely impacted by factors unrelated to the related mortgaged property and mortgage loan. Such borrower may also have previously owned property other than the related mortgaged property or may be a so-called “recycled” single-purpose entity that previously had other business activities and liabilities. However, we cannot assure you that such borrowers have in the past complied, or in the future will comply, with such requirements. Additionally, in some cases unsecured debt exists and/or is allowed in the future. Furthermore, in many cases such borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions which typically are required in order for such borrowers to be viewed under standard rating agency criteria as “single purpose entities”.
Although a borrower may currently be a single purpose entity, in certain cases the borrowers were not originally formed as single purpose entities, but at origination of the related mortgage loan their organizational documents were amended. Such borrower may have previously owned property other than the related mortgaged property and may not have observed all covenants that typically are required to consider a borrower a “single purpose entity” and thus may have liabilities arising from events prior to becoming a single purpose entity.
The organizational documents of a borrower or the direct or indirect managing partner or member of a borrower may also contain requirements that there be one or two independent directors, managers or trustees (depending on the entity form of such borrower) whose vote is required before the borrower files a voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency petition or otherwise institutes insolvency proceedings. Generally, but not always, the independent directors, managers or trustees may only be replaced with certain other independent successors. Although the requirement of having independent directors, managers or trustees is designed to mitigate the risk of a voluntary bankruptcy filing by a solvent borrower, a borrower could file for bankruptcy without obtaining the consent of its independent director(s) (and we cannot assure you that such bankruptcy would be dismissed as an unauthorized filing), and in any case the independent directors, managers or trustees may determine that a bankruptcy filing is an appropriate course of action to be taken by such borrower. Although the independent directors, managers or trustees generally owe no fiduciary duties to entities other than the borrower itself, such determination might take into account the interests and financial condition of such borrower’s parent entities and such parent entities’ other subsidiaries in addition to those of the borrower. Consequently, the financial distress of an affiliate of a borrower might increase the likelihood of a bankruptcy filing by a borrower.
The bankruptcy of a borrower, or a general partner or managing member of a borrower, may impair the ability of the lender to enforce its rights and remedies under the related mortgage loan. Certain of the mortgage loans have been made to single purpose limited
105
partnerships that have a general partner or general partners that are not themselves single purpose entities. Such loans are subject to additional bankruptcy risk. The organizational documents of the general partner in such cases do not limit it to acting as the general partner of the partnership. Accordingly there is a greater risk that the general partner may become insolvent for reasons unrelated to the mortgaged property. The bankruptcy of a general partner may dissolve the partnership under applicable state law. In addition, even if the partnership itself is not insolvent, actions by the partnership and/or a bankrupt general partner that are outside the ordinary course of their business, such as refinancing the related mortgage loan, may require prior approval of the bankruptcy court in the general partner’s bankruptcy case. The proceedings required to resolve these issues may be costly and time-consuming.
Any borrower, even an entity structured as a single purpose entity, as an owner of real estate, will be subject to certain potential liabilities and risks as an owner of real estate. We cannot assure you that any borrower will not file for bankruptcy protection or that creditors of a borrower or a corporate or individual general partner or managing member of a borrower will not initiate a bankruptcy or similar proceeding against such borrower or corporate or individual general partner or managing member.
Certain mortgage loans may have the benefit of a general payment guaranty of a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage loan. A payment guaranty for a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage loan that is greater than 10% presents a risk for consolidation of the assets of a borrower and the guarantor. In addition, certain borrowers’ organizational documents or the terms of certain mortgage loans permit an affiliated property manager to maintain a custodial account on behalf of such borrower and certain affiliates of such borrower into which funds available to such borrower under the terms of the related mortgage loans and funds of such affiliates are held, but which funds are and will continue to be separately accounted for as to each item of income and expense for each related mortgaged property and each related borrower. A custodial account structure for affiliated entities, while common among certain REITs, institutions or independent owners of multiple properties, presents a risk for consolidation of the assets of such affiliates as commingling of funds is a factor a court may consider in considering a request by other creditors for substantive consolidation. Substantive consolidation is an equitable remedy that could result in an otherwise solvent company becoming subject to the bankruptcy proceedings of an insolvent affiliate, making its assets available to repay the debts of affiliated companies. A court has the discretion to order substantive consolidation in whole or in part and may include non-debtor affiliates of the bankrupt entity in the proceedings. In particular, consolidation may be ordered when corporate funds are commingled and used for a principal’s personal purposes, inadequate records of transfers are made and corporate entities are deemed an alter ego of a principal. Strict adherence to maintaining separate books and records, avoiding commingling of assets and otherwise maintaining corporate policies designed to preserve the separateness of corporate assets and liabilities make it less likely that a court would order substantive consolidation, but we cannot assure you that the related borrowers, property managers or affiliates will comply with these requirements as set forth in the related mortgage loans.
Furthermore, with respect to any affiliated borrowers, creditors of a common parent in bankruptcy may seek to consolidate the assets of such borrowers with those of the parent. Consolidation of the assets of such borrowers would likely have an adverse effect on the funds available to make distributions on your certificates, and may lead to a downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the ratings of your certificates.
106
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Single Purpose Entity Covenants” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
In addition, borrowers may own a mortgaged property as a Delaware statutory trust or as tenants-in-common. Delaware statutory trusts may be restricted in their ability to actively operate a property, and in the case of a mortgaged property that is owned by a Delaware statutory trust or by tenants-in-common, there is a risk that obtaining the consent of the holders of the beneficial interests in the Delaware statutory trust or the consent of the tenants-in-common will be time consuming and cause delays with respect to the taking of certain actions by or on behalf of the borrower, including with respect to the related mortgaged property. See “—Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery” below. See also “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership”.
In addition, certain of the mortgage loans may have borrowers that are wholly or partially (directly or indirectly) owned by one or more crowd funding investor groups or other diversified ownership structures. Investments in the commercial real estate market through crowd funding investor groups are a relatively recent development and there may be certain unanticipated risks to this new ownership structure which may adversely affect the related mortgage loan. Typically, the crowd funding investor group is made up of a large number of individual investors who invest relatively small amounts in the group pursuant to a securities offering. With respect to an equity investment in the borrower, the crowd funding investor group in turn purchases a stake in the borrower. Accordingly, equity in the borrower is indirectly held by the individual investors in the crowd funding group. We cannot assure you that either the crowd funding investor group or the individual investors in the crowd funding investor group or other diversified ownership structure have relevant expertise in the commercial real estate market. Additionally, crowd funding investor groups are required to comply with various securities regulations related to offerings of securities and we cannot assure you that any enforcement action or legal proceeding regarding failure to comply with such securities regulations would not delay enforcement of the related mortgage loan. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that a bankruptcy proceeding by the crowd funding investor group or other diversified ownership structure will not delay enforcement of the related mortgage loan or otherwise impair the borrower’s ability to operate the related mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership”. See “—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions”, “—Frequent and Early Occurrence of Borrower Delinquencies and Defaults May Adversely Affect Your Investment” and “—The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property”.
A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans
Numerous statutory provisions, including the federal bankruptcy code and state laws affording relief to debtors, may interfere with and delay the ability of a secured mortgage lender to obtain payment of a loan, to realize upon collateral and/or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, under the federal bankruptcy code, virtually all actions (including foreclosure actions and deficiency judgment proceedings) are automatically stayed upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, and, often, no interest or principal payments are made during the course of the bankruptcy proceeding. Also, under federal bankruptcy law, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior lien holder may stay the senior lender from taking action to foreclose out such junior lien. Certain of the mortgage loans have sponsors
107
that have previously filed bankruptcy and we cannot assure you that such sponsors will not be more likely than other sponsors to utilize their rights in bankruptcy in the event of any threatened action by the mortgagee to enforce its rights under the related mortgage loan documents. As a result, the issuing entity’s recovery with respect to borrowers in bankruptcy proceedings may be significantly delayed, and the aggregate amount ultimately collected may be substantially less than the amount owed. See “—Other Financings or Ability To Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk” below, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Additionally, the courts of any state may refuse the foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust when an acceleration of the indebtedness would be inequitable or unjust or the circumstances would render the action unconscionable. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure”.
See also “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” above.
Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions
There may be (and there may exist from time to time) pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or disputes with, the borrowers, the borrower sponsors, the managers of the mortgaged properties and their respective affiliates arising out of their ordinary business. We have not undertaken a search for all legal proceedings that relate to the borrowers, borrower sponsors, managers for the mortgaged properties or their respective affiliates. Potential investors are advised and encouraged to perform their own searches related to such matters to the extent relevant to their investment decision. Any such litigation or dispute may materially impair distributions to certificateholders if borrowers must use property income to pay judgments, legal fees or litigation costs. We cannot assure you that any litigation or dispute or any settlement of any litigation or dispute will not have a material adverse effect on your investment.
Additionally, a borrower or a principal of a borrower or affiliate may have been a party to a bankruptcy, foreclosure, litigation or other proceeding, particularly against a lender, or may have been convicted of a crime in the past. In addition, certain of the borrower sponsors, property managers, affiliates of any of the foregoing and/or entities controlled thereby have been a party to bankruptcy proceedings, mortgage loan defaults and restructures, discounted payoffs, foreclosure proceedings or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions, or other material proceedings (including criminal proceedings) in the past, whether or not related to the mortgaged property securing a mortgage loan in this securitization transaction. In some cases, mortgaged properties securing certain of the mortgage loans previously secured other loans that had been in default, restructured or the subject of a discounted payoff, foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
Certain of the borrower sponsors may have a history of litigation or other proceedings against their lender, in some cases involving various parties to a securitization transaction. We cannot assure you that the borrower sponsors that have engaged in litigation or other proceedings in the past will not commence action against the issuing entity in the future upon any attempt by the special servicer to enforce the mortgage loan documents. Any such actions by the borrower or borrower sponsor may result in significant expense and potential loss to the issuing entity and a shortfall in funds available to make payments on the offered certificates. In addition, certain principals or borrower sponsors may have in the
108
past been convicted of, or pled guilty to, a felony. We cannot assure you that such borrower or principal will not be more likely than other borrowers or principals to avail itself or cause a borrower to avail itself of its legal rights, under the federal bankruptcy code or otherwise, in the event of an action or threatened action by the lender or its servicer to enforce the related mortgage loan documents, or otherwise conduct its operations in a manner that is in the best interests of the lender and/or the mortgaged property. We cannot assure you that any such proceedings or actions will not have a material adverse effect upon distributions on your certificates. Further, borrowers, principals of borrowers, property managers and affiliates of such parties may, in the future, be involved in bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings or other material proceedings (including criminal proceedings), whether or not related to the mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that any such proceedings will not negatively impact a borrower’s or borrower sponsor’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan and, as a result could have a material adverse effect upon your certificates.
Often it is difficult to confirm the identity of owners of all of the equity in a borrower, which means that past issues may not be discovered as to such owners. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations” and “—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” for additional information on certain mortgage loans in the issuing entity. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that there are no undisclosed bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings, deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure transaction and/or mortgage loan workout matters that involved one or more mortgage loans or mortgaged properties, and/or a guarantor, borrower sponsor or other party to a mortgage loan.
In addition, in the event the owner of a borrower experiences financial problems, we cannot assure you that such owner would not attempt to take actions with respect to the mortgaged property that may adversely affect the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations” for information regarding litigation matters with respect to certain mortgage loans.
Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk
When a borrower (or its constituent members) also has one or more other outstanding loans (even if they are pari passu, subordinated, mezzanine, preferred equity or unsecured loans or another type of equity pledge), the issuing entity is subjected to additional risk such as:
● | the borrower (or its constituent members) may have difficulty servicing and repaying multiple financings; |
● | the existence of other financings will generally also make it more difficult for the borrower to obtain refinancing of the related mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable) or sell the related mortgaged property and may thereby jeopardize repayment of the mortgage loan (or whole loan, if applicable); |
● | the need to service additional financings may reduce the cash flow available to the borrower to operate and maintain the mortgaged property and the value of the mortgaged property may decline as a result; |
● | if a borrower (or its constituent members) defaults on its mortgage loan and/or any other financing, actions taken by other lenders such as a suit for collection, foreclosure or an involuntary petition for bankruptcy against the borrower could impair the security available to the issuing entity, including the mortgaged |
109
property, or stay the issuing entity’s ability to foreclose during the course of the bankruptcy case;
● | the bankruptcy of another lender also may operate to stay foreclosure by the issuing entity; and |
● | the issuing entity may also be subject to the costs and administrative burdens of involvement in foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings or related litigation. |
Although no companion loan related to a whole loan will be an asset of the issuing entity, the related borrower is still obligated to make interest and principal payments on such companion loan. As a result, the issuing entity is subject to additional risks, including:
● | the risk that the necessary maintenance of the related mortgaged property could be deferred to allow the borrower to pay the required debt service on these other obligations and that the value of the mortgaged property may fall as a result; and |
● | the risk that it may be more difficult for the borrower to refinance these loans or to sell the related mortgaged property for purposes of making any balloon payment on the entire balance of such loans and the related additional debt at maturity or on the related anticipated repayment date. |
With respect to mezzanine financing (if any), while a mezzanine lender has no security interest in the related mortgaged properties, a default under a mezzanine loan could cause a change in control of the related borrower. With respect to mortgage loans that permit mezzanine financing, the relative rights of the mortgagee and the related mezzanine lender will generally be set forth in an intercreditor agreement, which agreements typically provide that the rights of the mezzanine lender (including the right to payment) against the borrower and mortgaged property are subordinate to the rights of the mortgage lender and that the mezzanine lender may not take any enforcement action against the mortgage borrower and mortgaged property.
In addition, the mortgage loan documents related to certain mortgage loans may have or permit future “preferred equity” structures, where one or more special limited partners or members receive a preferred return in exchange for an infusion of capital or other type of equity pledge that may require payments of a specified return or of excess cash flow. Such arrangements can present risks that resemble mezzanine debt, including dilution of the borrower’s equity in the mortgaged property, stress on the cash flow in the form of a preferred return or excess cash payments, and/or potential changes in the management of the related mortgaged property in the event the preferred return is not satisfied.
Additionally, the terms of certain mortgage loans permit or require the borrowers to post letters of credit and/or surety bonds for the benefit of the related mortgage loan, which may constitute a contingent reimbursement obligation of the related borrower or an affiliate. The issuing bank or surety will not typically agree to subordination and standstill protection benefiting the mortgagee.
In addition, borrowers under most of the mortgage loans are generally permitted to incur trade payables and equipment financing, which may not be limited or may be significant, in order to operate the related mortgaged properties. Also, with respect to certain mortgage loans the related borrower either has incurred or is permitted to incur unsecured debt from an affiliate of either the borrower or the sponsor of the borrower. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—Other Unsecured Indebtedness”.
110
For additional information, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery
Certain of the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity have borrowers that own the related mortgaged properties as tenants-in-common. In general, with respect to a tenant-in-common ownership structure, each tenant-in-common owns an undivided share in the property and if such tenant-in-common desires to sell its interest in the property (and is unable to find a buyer or otherwise needs to force a partition) the tenant-in-common has the ability to request that a court order a sale of the property and distribute the proceeds to each tenant in common proportionally. As a result, if a tenant-in-common that has not waived its right of partition or similar right exercises a right of partition, the related mortgage loan may be subject to prepayment. The bankruptcy, dissolution or action for partition by one or more of the tenants-in-common could result in an early repayment of the related mortgage loan, significant delay in recovery against the tenant-in-common borrowers, particularly if the tenant-in-common borrowers file for bankruptcy separately or in series (because each time a tenant-in-common borrower files for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court stay will be reinstated), a material impairment in property management and a substantial decrease in the amount recoverable upon the related mortgage loan. Not all tenants-in-common under the mortgage loans will be single purpose entities. Each tenant-in-common borrower has waived its right to partition, reducing the risk of partition. However, we cannot assure you that, if challenged, this waiver would be enforceable. In addition, in some cases, the related mortgage loan documents may provide for full recourse (or in an amount equal to its pro rata share of the debt) to the related tenant-in-common borrower or the guarantor if a tenant-in-common files for partition. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership”.
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Cross-Collateralization
Cross-collateralization arrangements may be terminated in certain circumstances under the terms of the related mortgage loan documents. Cross-collateralization arrangements whereby multiple borrowers grant their respective mortgaged properties as security for one or more mortgage loans could be challenged as fraudulent conveyances by the creditors or the bankruptcy estate of any of the related borrowers.
Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of the liens may focus on the benefits realized by that borrower from the respective mortgage loan proceeds, as well as the overall cross-collateralization. If a court were to conclude that the granting of the liens was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance, that court could subordinate all or part of the mortgage loan to other debt of that borrower, recover prior payments made on that mortgage loan, or take other actions such as invalidating the mortgage loan or the mortgages securing the cross-collateralization. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
In addition, when multiple real properties secure a mortgage loan, the amount of the mortgage encumbering any particular one of those properties may be less than the full amount of the related aggregate mortgage loan indebtedness, to minimize recording tax. This mortgage amount is generally established at 100% to 150% of the appraised value or allocated loan amount for the mortgaged property and will limit the extent to which proceeds from the property will be available to offset declines in value of the other properties securing the same mortgage loan.
111
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics” for a description of any mortgage loans that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other or that are secured by multiple properties owned by multiple borrowers.
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions
Provisions requiring yield maintenance charges, prepayment premiums or lockout periods may not be enforceable in some states and under federal bankruptcy law. Provisions requiring prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges also may be interpreted as constituting the collection of interest for usury purposes. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the obligation to pay a yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium will be enforceable. Also, we cannot assure you that foreclosure proceeds will be sufficient to pay an enforceable yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium.
Additionally, although the collateral substitution provisions related to defeasance do not have the same effect on the certificateholders as prepayment, we cannot assure you that a court would not interpret those provisions as the equivalent of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium. In certain jurisdictions those collateral substitution provisions might therefore be deemed unenforceable or usurious under applicable law or public policy.
Risks Associated with One Action Rules
Several states (such as California) have laws that prohibit more than one “judicial action” to enforce a mortgage obligation, and some courts have construed the term “judicial action” broadly. Accordingly, the special servicer will be required to obtain advice of counsel prior to enforcing any of the issuing entity’s rights under any of the mortgage loans that include mortgaged properties where a “one action” rule could be applicable. In the case of a multi-property mortgage loan which is secured by mortgaged properties located in multiple states, the special servicer may be required to foreclose first on properties located in states where “one action” rules apply (and where non-judicial foreclosure is permitted) before foreclosing on properties located in states where judicial foreclosure is the only permitted method of foreclosure. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure”.
State Law Limitations on Assignments of Leases and Rents May Entail Risks
Generally mortgage loans included in an issuing entity secured by mortgaged properties that are subject to leases typically will be secured by an assignment of leases and rents pursuant to which the related borrower (or with respect to any indemnity deed of trust structure, the related property owner) assigns to the lender its right, title and interest as landlord under the leases of the related mortgaged properties, and the income derived from those leases, as further security for the related mortgage loan, while retaining a license to collect rents for so long as there is no default. If the borrower defaults, the license terminates and the lender is entitled to collect rents. Some state laws may require that the lender take possession of the related property and obtain a judicial appointment of a receiver before becoming entitled to collect the rents. In addition, if bankruptcy or similar proceedings are commenced by or in respect of the borrower, the lender’s ability to collect the rents may be adversely affected. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Leases and Rents” and “—Bankruptcy Laws”.
112
Various Other Laws Could Affect the Exercise of Lender’s Rights
The laws of the jurisdictions in which the mortgaged properties are located (which laws may vary substantially) govern many of the legal aspects of the mortgage loans. These laws may affect the ability to foreclose on, and, in turn the ability to realize value from, the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. For example, state law determines:
● | what proceedings are required for foreclosure; |
● | whether the borrower and any foreclosed junior lienors may redeem the property and the conditions under which these rights of redemption may be exercised; |
● | whether and to what extent recourse to the borrower is permitted; and |
● | what rights junior mortgagees have and whether the amount of fees and interest that lenders may charge is limited. |
In addition, the laws of some jurisdictions may render certain provisions of the mortgage loans unenforceable or subject to limitations which may affect lender’s rights under the mortgage loans. Delays in liquidations of defaulted mortgage loans and shortfalls in amounts realized upon liquidation as a result of the application of these laws may create delays and shortfalls in payments to certificateholders. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans”.
The Absence of Lockboxes Entails Risks That Could Adversely Affect Distributions on Your Certificates
Certain of the mortgage loans may not require the related borrower to cause rent and other payments to be made into a lockbox account maintained on behalf of the mortgagee, although some of those mortgage loans do provide for a springing lockbox. If rental payments are not required to be made directly into a lockbox account, there is a risk that the borrower will divert such funds for other purposes.
Risks of Anticipated Repayment Date Loans
Certain of the mortgage loans provide that, if after a certain date (referred to as the anticipated repayment date) the related borrower has not prepaid the mortgage loan in full, any principal outstanding after that anticipated repayment date will accrue interest at an increased interest rate rather than the stated mortgage loan rate. Generally, from and after the anticipated repayment date, cash flow in excess of that required for debt service, the funding of reserves and certain approved operating expenses with respect to the related mortgaged property will be applied toward the payment of principal (without payment of a yield maintenance charge) of the related mortgage loan until its principal balance has been reduced to zero. Although these provisions may create an incentive for the borrower to repay the mortgage loan in full on its anticipated repayment date, a substantial payment would be required and the borrower has no obligation to do so. While interest at the initial mortgage rate continues to accrue and be payable on a current basis on the mortgage loan after its anticipated repayment date, the payment of excess interest will be deferred and will be required to be paid only after the outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage loan has been paid in full, at which time the excess interest that has been deferred, to the extent actually collected, will be paid to the holders of the Class Z certificates, which are not offered by this prospectus. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—ARD Loans”.
113
Borrower May Be Unable To Repay Remaining Principal Balance on Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date; Longer Amortization Schedules and Interest-Only Provisions Increase Risk
Mortgage loans with substantial remaining principal balances at their stated maturity date or on the related anticipated repayment date, as applicable, involve greater risk than fully-amortizing mortgage loans because the borrower may be unable to repay the mortgage loan at that time. In addition, fully amortizing mortgage loans which may pay interest on an “actual/360” basis but have fixed monthly payments may, in effect, have a small balloon payment due at maturity.
Most of the mortgage loans have amortization schedules that are significantly longer than their respective terms to maturity or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, and many of the mortgage loans require only payments of interest for part or all of their respective terms. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Due Dates; Mortgage Rates; Calculations of Interest”. A longer amortization schedule or an interest-only provision in a mortgage loan will result in a higher amount of principal outstanding under the mortgage loan at any particular time, including at the maturity date or on the related anticipated repayment date, than would have otherwise been the case had a shorter amortization schedule been used or had the mortgage loan had a shorter interest-only period or not included an interest-only provision at all. That higher principal amount outstanding could both (i) make it more difficult for the related borrower to make the required balloon payment at maturity or to repay the outstanding principal amount at the anticipated repayment date and (ii) lead to increased losses for the issuing entity either during the loan term or at maturity or anticipated repayment date if the mortgage loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan.
A borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage loan on its stated maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, typically will depend upon its ability either to refinance the mortgage loan or to sell the mortgaged property at a price sufficient to permit repayment. A borrower’s ability to achieve either of these goals will be affected by a number of factors, including:
● | the availability of, and competition for, credit for commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community real estate projects, which fluctuate over time; |
● | the prevailing interest rates; |
● | the net operating income generated by the mortgaged property; |
● | the fair market value of the related mortgaged property; |
● | the borrower’s equity in the related mortgaged property; |
● | significant tenant rollover at the related mortgaged properties (see “—Retail Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Office Properties Have Special Risks” above); |
● | the borrower’s financial condition; |
● | the operating history and occupancy level of the mortgaged property; |
● | reductions in applicable government assistance/rent subsidy programs; |
● | the tax laws; and |
114
● | prevailing general and regional economic conditions. |
With respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a whole loan, the risks relating to balloon payment obligations are enhanced by the existence and amount of any related companion loan.
None of the sponsors, any party to the pooling and servicing agreement or any other person will be under any obligation to refinance any mortgage loan. However, in order to maximize recoveries on defaulted mortgage loans, the pooling and servicing agreement permits the special servicer (and the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan may permit the related special servicer) to extend and modify mortgage loans in a manner consistent with the servicing standard, subject to the limitations described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans” and “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”.
Neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have the ability to extend or modify a non-serviced mortgage loan because such mortgage loan is being serviced by the master servicer or special servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of the applicable non-serviced whole loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
We cannot assure you that any extension or modification will increase the present value of recoveries in a given case. Whether or not losses are ultimately sustained, any delay in collection of a balloon payment that would otherwise be distributable on your certificates, whether such delay is due to borrower default or to modification of the related mortgage loan, will likely extend the weighted average life of your certificates.
In any event, we cannot assure you that each borrower under a balloon loan will have the ability to repay the principal balance of such mortgage loan on the related maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics”.
Risks Related to Ground Leases and Other Leasehold Interests
With respect to certain mortgaged properties, the encumbered interest will be characterized as a “fee interest” if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the mortgaged property (provided that if the borrower has a leasehold interest in any portion of the mortgaged property, such portion is not material to the use or operation of the mortgaged property), or (ii) the mortgage loan is secured by the borrower’s leasehold interest in the mortgaged property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related mortgaged property.
Leasehold mortgage loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of the borrower. The most significant of these risks is that if the related borrower’s leasehold were to be terminated upon a lease default, the lender would lose its security in the leasehold interest. Generally, each related ground lease or a lessor estoppel requires the lessor to give the lender notice of the borrower’s defaults under the ground lease and an opportunity to cure them, permits the leasehold interest to be assigned to the lender or the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, in some cases only upon the consent of the lessor, and contains certain other protective provisions typically included in a “mortgageable” ground lease, although not all these protective provisions are included in each case.
115
Upon the bankruptcy of a lessor or a lessee under a ground lease, the debtor has the right to assume or reject the lease. If a debtor lessor rejects the lease, the lessee has the right pursuant to the federal bankruptcy code to treat such lease as terminated by rejection or remain in possession of its leased premises for the rent otherwise payable under the lease for the remaining term of the ground lease (including renewals) and to offset against such rent any damages incurred due to the landlord’s failure to perform its obligations under the lease. If a debtor lessee/borrower rejects any or all of the lease, the leasehold lender could succeed to the lessee/borrower’s position under the lease only if the lease specifically grants the lender such right. If both the lessor and the lessee/borrower are involved in bankruptcy proceedings, the issuing entity may be unable to enforce the bankrupt lessee/borrower’s pre-petition agreement to refuse to treat a ground lease rejected by a bankrupt lessor as terminated. In such circumstances, a ground lease could be terminated notwithstanding lender protection provisions contained in the ground lease or in the mortgage.
Some of the ground leases securing the mortgage loans may provide that the ground rent payable under the related ground lease increases during the term of the mortgage loan. These increases may adversely affect the cash flow and net income of the related borrower.
A leasehold lender could lose its security unless (i) the leasehold lender holds a fee mortgage, (ii) the ground lease requires the lessor to enter into a new lease with the leasehold lender upon termination or rejection of the ground lease, or (iii) the bankruptcy court, as a court of equity, allows the leasehold lender to assume the ground lessee’s obligations under the ground lease and succeed to the ground lessee’s position. Although not directly covered by the 1994 amendments to the federal bankruptcy code, such a result would be consistent with the purpose of the 1994 amendments to the federal bankruptcy code granting the holders of leasehold mortgages permitted under the terms of the lease the right to succeed to the position of a leasehold mortgagor. Although consistent with the federal bankruptcy code, such position may not be adopted by the applicable bankruptcy court.
Further, in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Precision Indus. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC, 327 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2003)) the court ruled with respect to an unrecorded lease of real property that where a statutory sale of the fee interest in leased property occurs under the federal bankruptcy code upon the bankruptcy of a landlord, such sale terminates a lessee’s possessory interest in the property, and the purchaser assumes title free and clear of any interest, including any leasehold estates. Pursuant to the federal bankruptcy code, a lessee may request the bankruptcy court to prohibit or condition the statutory sale of the property so as to provide adequate protection of the leasehold interest; however, the court ruled that this provision does not ensure continued possession of the property, but rather entitles the lessee to compensation for the value of its leasehold interest, typically from the sale proceeds. While there are certain circumstances under which a “free and clear” sale under the federal bankruptcy code would not be authorized (including that the lessee could not be compelled in a legal or equitable proceeding to accept a monetary satisfaction of his possessory interest, and that none of the other conditions of the federal bankruptcy code otherwise permits the sale), we cannot assure you that those circumstances would be present in any proposed sale of a leased premises. As a result, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a statutory sale of leased property pursuant to the federal bankruptcy code, the lessee will be able to maintain possession of the property under the ground lease. In addition, we cannot assure you that the lessee and/or the lender will be able to recoup the full value of the leasehold interest in bankruptcy court. Most of the ground leases contain standard protections typically obtained
116
by securitization lenders. Certain of the ground leases with respect to a mortgage loan included in the issuing entity may not. See also representation and warranty no. 34 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
Except as noted in this prospectus, each of the ground leases has a term that extends at least 20 years beyond the maturity date of the mortgage loan (taking into account all freely exercisable extension options) and contains customary mortgagee protection provisions, including notice and cure rights and the right to enter into a new lease with the applicable ground lessor in the event a ground lease is rejected or terminated.
With respect to certain of the mortgage loans, the related borrower may have given to certain lessors under the related ground lease a right of first refusal in the event a sale is contemplated or an option to purchase all or a portion of the mortgaged property and these provisions, if not waived, may impede the mortgagee’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure or adversely affect the foreclosure process.
See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”. See also “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Fee & Leasehold Estates; Ground Leases”.
Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds
Certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans have or may in the future have the benefit of reduced real estate taxes in connection with a local government “payment in lieu of taxes” program or other tax abatement arrangements. Upon expiration of such program or if such programs were otherwise terminated, the related borrower would be required to pay higher, and in some cases substantially higher, real estate taxes. Prior to expiration of such program, the tax benefit to the mortgaged property may decrease throughout the term of the expiration date until the expiration of such program. An increase in real estate taxes may impact the ability of the borrower to pay debt service on the mortgage loan.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations” for descriptions of real estate tax matters relating to certain mortgaged properties.
Risks Relating to Tax Credits
With respect to certain mortgage loans secured by multifamily properties, the related property owners may be entitled to receive low-income housing tax credits pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which provides a tax credit from the state tax credit allocating agency to owners of multifamily rental properties meeting the definition of low-income housing. The total amount of tax credits to which a property owner is entitled is generally based upon the percentage of total units made available to qualified tenants. The owners of the mortgaged properties subject to the tax credit provisions may use the tax credits to offset income tax that they may otherwise owe, and the tax credits may be shared among the equity owners of the project. In general, the tax credits on the applicable mortgage loans will be allocated to equity investors in the borrower.
The tax credit provisions limit the gross rent for each low-income unit. Under the tax credit provisions, a property owner must comply with the tenant income restrictions and rental restrictions over a minimum 15-year compliance period, although the property owner may take the tax credits on an accelerated basis over a 10-year period. In the event a
117
multifamily rental property does not maintain compliance with the tax credit restrictions on tenant income or rental rates or otherwise satisfy the tax credit provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the property owner may suffer a reduction in the amount of available tax credits and/or face the recapture of all or part of the tax credits related to the period of noncompliance and face the partial recapture of previously taken tax credits. The loss of tax credits, and the possibility of recapture of tax credits already taken, may provide significant incentive for the property owner to keep the related multifamily rental property in compliance with these tax credit restrictions, which may limit the income derived from the related property.
If the issuing entity were to foreclose on such a property it would be unable to take advantage of the tax credits, but could sell the property with the right to the remaining credits to a tax paying investor. Any subsequent property owner would continue to be subject to rent limitations unless an election was made to terminate the tax credits, in which case the property could be operated as a market rate property after the expiration of three years. The limitations on rent and on the ability of potential buyers to take advantage of the tax credits may limit the issuing entity’s recovery on that property.
State and Local Mortgage Recording Taxes May Apply Upon a Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure and Reduce Net Proceeds
Many jurisdictions impose recording taxes on mortgages which, if not paid at the time of the recording of the mortgage, may impair the ability of the lender to foreclose the mortgage. Such taxes, interest, and penalties could be significant in amount and would, if imposed, reduce the net proceeds realized by the issuing entity in liquidating the real property securing the related mortgage loan.
Risks Relating to Shari’ah Compliant Loans
Certain of the mortgage loans may be structured to comply with Islamic law (Shari’ah). The related borrower holds the fee interest in the mortgaged property and is owned by a U.S. division of the borrower sponsor. The related borrower has master leased the related mortgaged property to a master lessee, which is indirectly owned in part by certain investors of the Islamic faith. The rent payable pursuant to the applicable master lease is intended to cover the debt service payments required under the related mortgage loan, as well as reserve payments and any other sums due under the mortgage loan. By its terms, the master lease is expressly subordinate to the related mortgage loan.
There is a risk that in a bankruptcy case of a master lessee, the master lease could be recharacterized as a financing lease in connection with an acquisition of the mortgaged property by the master lessee. If such recharacterization occurred, the master lessee could be deemed to own the fee interest in the related mortgaged property and the master lease would be viewed as a loan. In Shari’ah compliant mortgage loans, the master lessee typically does not grant a leasehold mortgage to the lender. Therefore, there is a risk that if the master lease were recharacterized as a financing lease, the lender could lose its mortgage on the property. To mitigate the effect of such recharacterization, (i) each master lessee has been formed and is obligated to continue as a single purpose entity, (ii) a bankruptcy by a master lessee is a “bad act” that would trigger guarantor liability under the recourse carveout guaranty for the related mortgage loan, (iii) the master lease is expressly subordinate to the related mortgage loan, and (iv) title insurance was obtained insuring that the related borrower is the fee owner of the related mortgaged property.
118
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests
The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates (including certain of the underwriters) expect to derive ancillary benefits from this offering and their respective incentives may not be aligned with those of purchasers of the offered certificates. The sponsors originated or purchased the mortgage loans in order to securitize the mortgage loans by means of a transaction such as the offering of the offered certificates. The sponsors will sell the mortgage loans to the depositor (an affiliate of UBS AG, New York Branch, one of the sponsors and originators, and of UBS Securities LLC, one of the underwriters) on the closing date in exchange for cash, derived from the sale of the offered certificates to investors and/or in exchange for offered certificates. A completed offering would reduce the originators’ exposure to the mortgage loans. The originators made the mortgage loans with a view toward securitizing them and distributing the exposure by means of a transaction such as this offering of offered certificates. In addition, certain mortgaged properties may have tenants that are affiliated with the related originator. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases”. This offering of offered certificates will effectively transfer the originators’ exposure to the mortgage loans to purchasers of the offered certificates.
The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates expect to receive various benefits, including compensation, commissions, payments, rebates, remuneration and business opportunities, in connection with or as a result of this offering of offered certificates and their interests in the mortgage loans. The sponsors and their affiliates will effectively receive compensation, and may record a profit, in an amount based on, among other things, the amount of proceeds (net of transaction expenses) received from the sale of the offered certificates to investors relative to their investment in the mortgage loans. The benefits to the originators, the sponsors and their affiliates arising from the decision to securitize the mortgage loans may be greater than they would have been had other assets been selected.
Furthermore, the sponsors and/or their affiliates may benefit from a completed offering of the offered certificates because the offering would establish a market precedent and a valuation data point for securities similar to the offered certificates, thus enhancing the ability of the sponsors and their affiliates to conduct similar offerings in the future and permitting them to adjust the fair value of the mortgage loans or other similar assets or securities held on their balance sheet, including increasing the carrying value or avoiding decreasing the carrying value of some or all of such similar positions.
In some cases, the originators, the sponsors or their affiliates are the holders of the mezzanine loans, subordinate loans, unsecured loans and/or companion loans related to their mortgage loans. The originators, the sponsors and/or their respective affiliates may retain existing mezzanine loans, subordinate loans, unsecured loans and/or companion loans or originate future permitted mezzanine indebtedness, subordinate indebtedness or unsecured indebtedness with respect to the mortgage loans. These transactions may cause the originators, the sponsors and their affiliates or their clients or counterparties who purchase the mezzanine loans, subordinate loans, unsecured loans and/or companion loans, as applicable, to have economic interests and incentives that do not align with, and that may be directly contrary to, those of an investor in the offered certificates. In addition, these transactions or actions taken to maintain, adjust or unwind any positions in the future, may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material effect on the market for the offered certificates (if any), including adversely affecting the value of the offered
119
certificates, particularly in illiquid markets. The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates will have no obligation to take, refrain from taking or cease taking any action with respect to such companion loans or any existing or future mezzanine loans, subordinate loans and/or unsecured loans, based on the potential effect on an investor in the offered certificates, and may receive substantial returns from these transactions. In addition, the originators, the sponsors or any of their respective affiliates may benefit from certain relationships, including financial dealings, with any borrower, any non-recourse carveout guarantor or any of their respective affiliates, aside from the origination of mortgage loans or contribution of mortgage loans into this securitization, and they may have other financing arrangements with any borrower, any non-recourse carveout guarantor or any of their respective affiliates, including, without limitation, making loans or having other financing arrangements secured by indirect ownership interests in the mortgage loan borrowers not otherwise prohibited by the terms of the mortgage loan documents. Conflicts may also arise because the sponsors and their respective affiliates intend to continue to actively acquire, develop, operate, finance and dispose of real estate-related assets in the ordinary course of their businesses. During the course of their business activities, the sponsors and their respective affiliates may acquire, sell or lease properties, or finance loans secured by properties, which may include the properties securing the mortgage loans or properties that are in the same markets as the mortgaged properties. Such other properties, similar to other third-party owned real estate, may compete with the mortgaged properties for existing and potential tenants. The sponsors may also, from time to time, be among the tenants at the mortgaged properties, and they should be expected to make occupancy-related decisions based on their self-interest and not that of the issuing entity. We cannot assure you that the activities of these parties with respect to such other properties will not adversely impact the performance of the mortgaged properties.
In addition, certain of the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity may have been refinancings of debt previously held by a sponsor, an originator or one of their respective affiliates, or a sponsor, an originator or one of their respective affiliates may have or have had equity investments in the borrowers or mortgaged properties under certain of the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. Each of the sponsors, the originators and their respective affiliates have made and/or may make loans to, or equity investments in, affiliates of the borrowers under the related mortgage loans. In the circumstances described above, the interests of the sponsors, the originators and their respective affiliates may differ from, and compete with, the interests of the issuing entity.
Further, various originators, sponsors and their respective affiliates are acting in multiple capacities in or with respect to this transaction, which may include, without limitation, acting as one or more transaction parties or a subcontractor or vendor of such party, participating in or contracting for interim servicing and/or custodial services with certain transaction parties, and/or conducting due diligence on behalf of an investor with respect to the mortgage loans prior to their transfer to the issuing entity.
In addition, affiliates of Ladder Capital Finance LLC, a mortgage loan seller, originator and sponsor, are the respective borrowers with respect to the mortgage loans identified on Annex A-1 as Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, respectively, collectively representing approximately 0.3% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date. The interests of such borrowers may conflict with the interests of the certificateholders, and Ladder Capital Finance LLC has no obligation to act in the best interest of the certificateholders. In addition, there can be no assurance that the related mortgage loans do not contain terms less favorable to the lender (and consequently, to the investors) than loans that were not made to affiliates of the sponsor.
120
Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest.
For a description of certain of the foregoing relationships and arrangements that exist among the parties to this securitization, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships And Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties” and “Transaction Parties”.
These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as described in “—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests”, “—Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans” and “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below. Each of the foregoing relationships and related interests should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any offered certificates.
The Servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loans Will Shift to Other Servicers
The servicing of the CrossPoint whole loan and the City Square and Clay Street whole loan, each a servicing shift whole loan, is expected to be governed by the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization only temporarily, until the related servicing shift securitization date. The servicing of the AFIN Portfolio whole loan is being governed by the UBS 2017-C7 pooling and servicing agreement only temporarily, until such time as the related controlling pari passu companion loan is securitized in a separate securitization. On the related servicing shift securitization date, the servicing and administration of a servicing shift whole loan will shift to the applicable master servicer and the applicable special servicer under the related servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement and will be governed exclusively by such servicing shift pooling and servicing agreement and the related intercreditor agreement. Neither the closing date of any such securitization nor the identity of any such servicing shift master servicer or servicing shift special servicer has been determined. In addition, the provisions of the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreements have not yet been determined. Prospective investors should be aware that they will not have any control over the identity of any servicing shift master servicer or servicing shift special servicer, nor will they have any assurance as to the particular terms of the servicing shift pooling and servicing agreements except to the extent of compliance with any requirements set forth in the related intercreditor agreement. Moreover, the directing certificateholder for this securitization will not have any consent or consultation rights with respect to the servicing of a servicing shift whole loan other than those limited consent and consultation rights as are provided in the related intercreditor agreement, and the holder of the related controlling pari passu companion loan or the controlling party in the related securitization of such controlling pari passu companion loan or such other party specified in the related intercreditor agreement is expected to have rights similar to, but not necessarily identical to, those granted to the directing certificateholder in this transaction. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests
The activities and interests of the underwriters and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Underwriter Entities”) will not align with, and may in fact be directly contrary to, those of the certificateholders. The Underwriter Entities are each part of separate global investment banking, securities and investment management firms that provide a wide range of financial services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high-net-worth individuals. As such, they actively make markets in and trade financial instruments for their own
121
account and for the accounts of customers. These financial instruments include debt and equity securities, currencies, commodities, bank loans, indices, baskets and other products. The Underwriter Entities’ activities include, among other things, executing large block trades and taking long and short positions directly and indirectly, through derivative instruments or otherwise. The securities and instruments in which the Underwriter Entities take positions, or expect to take positions, include loans similar to the mortgage loans, securities and instruments similar to the offered certificates and other securities and instruments. Market making is an activity where the Underwriter Entities buy and sell on behalf of customers, or for their own account, to satisfy the expected demand of customers. By its nature, market making involves facilitating transactions among market participants that have differing views of securities and instruments. Any short positions taken by the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients through marketing or otherwise will increase in value if the related securities or other instruments decrease in value, while positions taken by the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients in credit derivative or other derivative transactions with other parties, pursuant to which the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients sell or buy credit protection with respect to one or more classes of the offered certificates, may increase in value if the offered certificates default, are expected to default, or decrease in value.
The Underwriter Entities and their clients acting through them may execute such transactions, modify or terminate such derivative positions and otherwise act with respect to such transactions, and may exercise or enforce, or refrain from exercising or enforcing, any or all of their rights and powers in connection therewith, without regard to whether any such action might have an adverse effect on the offered certificates or the certificateholders. Additionally, none of the Underwriter Entities will have any obligation to disclose any of these securities or derivatives transactions to you in your capacity as a certificateholder. As a result, you should expect that the Underwriter Entities will take positions that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the investment objectives of investors in the offered certificates.
As a result of the Underwriter Entities’ various financial market activities, including acting as a research provider, investment advisor, market maker or principal investor, you should expect that personnel in various businesses throughout the Underwriter Entities will have and express research or investment views and make recommendations that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the objectives of investors in the offered certificates.
If an Underwriter Entity becomes a holder of any of the certificates, through market-making activity or otherwise, any actions that it takes in its capacity as a certificateholder, including voting, providing consents or otherwise will not necessarily be aligned with the interests of other holders of the same class or other classes of the certificates. To the extent an Underwriter Entity makes a market in the certificates (which it is under no obligation to do), it would expect to receive income from the spreads between its bid and offer prices for the certificates. The price at which an Underwriter Entity may be willing to purchase certificates, if it makes a market, will depend on market conditions and other relevant factors and may be significantly lower than the issue price for the certificates and significantly lower than the price at which it may be willing to sell certificates.
In addition, none of the Underwriter Entities will have any obligation to monitor the performance of the certificates or the actions of the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement and will have no authority to advise any party to the pooling and servicing agreement or to direct their actions.
Furthermore, each Underwriter Entity expects that a completed offering will enhance its ability to assist clients and counterparties in the transaction or in related transactions (including assisting clients in additional purchases and sales of the certificates and hedging
122
transactions). The Underwriter Entities expect to derive fees and other revenues from these transactions. In addition, participating in a successful offering and providing related services to clients may enhance the Underwriter Entities’ relationships with various parties, facilitate additional business development, and enable them to obtain additional business and generate additional revenue.
The Underwriter Entities are playing several roles in this transaction. See “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties” and “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers”. Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer
The pooling and servicing agreement provides that the mortgage loans serviced thereunder are required to be administered in accordance with the servicing standard without regard to ownership of any certificate by the master servicer, the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing Standard”. The pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan provides that such non-serviced whole loan is required to be administered in accordance with a servicing standard that is substantially similar in all material respect but not necessary identical to the servicing standard set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the master servicer, each sub-servicer and the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates and, as it relates to servicing and administration of a non-serviced mortgage loan, each master servicer, sub-servicer, special servicer or any of their respective affiliates under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan, may have interests when dealing with the mortgage loans that are in conflict with those of holders of the certificates, especially if such master servicer, sub-servicer, special servicer or affiliate holds certificates or companion loan securities, or has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower or a borrower sponsor.
Furthermore, nothing in the pooling and servicing agreement or otherwise will prohibit the master servicer or special servicer or an affiliate thereof from soliciting the refinancing of any of the mortgage loans. In the event that the master servicer or special servicer or an affiliate thereof refinances any of the mortgage loans included in the mortgage pool, an earlier than expected payoff of any such mortgage loan could occur, which would result in a prepayment, which such prepayment could have an adverse effect on the yield of the certificates. See “—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors”.
In order to minimize the effect of certain of these conflicts of interest as they relate to the special servicer, for so long as the special servicer is a borrower party with respect to an excluded special servicer loan, the special servicer will be required to resign as special servicer with respect to that mortgage loan and, prior to the occurrence of a control termination event under the pooling and servicing agreement, the directing certificateholder will be required to select a separate special servicer that is not a borrower party (referred to herein as an “excluded special servicer”) with respect to any excluded special servicer loan, unless such excluded special servicer loan is also an excluded loan. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a control termination event, if at any time the applicable excluded special servicer loan is also an excluded loan or if the directing certificateholder is entitled to appoint the excluded special servicer but does not so appoint within 30 days of
123
notice of resignation, the resigning special servicer will be required to select the related excluded special servicer. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause”. Any excluded special servicer will be required to perform all of the obligations of the special servicer with respect to such excluded special servicer loan and will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such excluded special servicer loan earned during such time as the related mortgage loan is an excluded special servicer loan. While the special servicer will have the same access to information related to the excluded special servicer loan as it does with respect to the other mortgage loans, the special servicer will covenant in the pooling and servicing agreement that it will not directly or indirectly provide any information related to any excluded special servicer loan to the related borrower party, any of the special servicer’s employees or personnel or any of its affiliates involved in the management of any investment in the related borrower party or the related mortgaged property or, to its actual knowledge, any non-affiliate that holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the related borrower party, and will maintain sufficient internal controls and appropriate policies and procedures in place in order to comply with those obligations. Notwithstanding those restrictions, there can be no assurance that the related borrower party will not obtain sensitive information related to the strategy of any contemplated workout or liquidation related to an excluded special servicer loan.
Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest. For instance, if the special servicer or its affiliate holds a subordinate class of certificates, the special servicer might seek to reduce the potential for losses allocable to those certificates from the mortgage loans by deferring acceleration in hope of maximizing future proceeds. However, that action could result in less proceeds to the issuing entity than would be realized if earlier action had been taken. In addition, no servicer is required to act in a manner more favorable to the offered certificates or any particular class of certificates than to the UBS 2018-C8 non-offered certificates, any serviced companion loan holder or the holder of any serviced companion loan securities.
The master servicer and the special servicer service and are expected to continue to service, in the ordinary course of their respective businesses, existing and new mortgage loans for third parties, including portfolios of mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans. The real properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. Consequently, personnel of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, may perform services, on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans at the same time as they are performing services, on behalf of other persons, with respect to other mortgage loans secured by properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans. In addition, the mortgage loan sellers will determine who will service mortgage loans that the mortgage loan sellers originate in the future, and that determination may be influenced by the mortgage loan seller’s opinion of servicing decisions made by the master servicer or the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement including, among other things, the manner in which the master servicer or special servicer enforces breaches of representations and warranties against the related mortgage loan seller. This may pose inherent conflicts for the master servicer or special servicer.
The special servicer may enter into one or more arrangements with the directing certificateholder, a controlling class certificateholder, a serviced companion loan holder or other certificateholders (or an affiliate or a third party representative of one or more of the preceding parties) to provide for a discount and/or revenue sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation in consideration of, among other things, the special
124
servicer’s appointment (or continuance) as special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement and/or the related intercreditor agreement and limitations on the right of such person to replace the special servicer. See “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below. Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, which is expected to act as the master servicer and the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement, assisted KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P. (or its affiliate) with its due diligence of the mortgage loans prior to the closing date.
Similarly, it is expected that Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, will be the trustee, the custodian and the certificate administrator for this transaction. In addition, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is also (1) the trustee, the certificate administrator and the custodian under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 pooling and servicing agreement, which governs the servicing and administration of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers whole loan, (2) the master servicer, the certificate administrator and the custodian under the UBS 2017-C7 pooling and servicing agreement, which is expected to govern the servicing and administration, until the securitization of the related control note, of the AFIN Portfolio whole loan and (3) is expected to be the trustee, certificate administrator and custodian under the BMARK 2018-B2 pooling and servicing agreement, which is expected to govern the servicing and administration of the BlueLinx Portfolio whole loan.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is also acting as (1) the interim servicer for all of the mortgage loans that Ladder Capital Finance LLC is contributing to this securitization transaction, representing approximately 23.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, and (2) the interim custodian for all of the mortgage loans that Ladder Capital Finance LLC is contributing to this securitization transaction.
Although the master servicer and the special servicer will be required to service and administer the mortgage loan pool in accordance with the servicing standard and, accordingly, without regard to their rights to receive compensation under the pooling and servicing agreement and without regard to any potential obligation to repurchase or substitute a mortgage loan if the master servicer or special servicer is a mortgage loan seller, the possibility of receiving additional servicing compensation in the nature of assumption and modification fees, the continuation of receiving fees to service or specially service a mortgage loan, or the desire to avoid a repurchase demand resulting from a breach of a representation and warranty or material document default may under certain circumstances provide the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, with an economic disincentive to comply with this standard.
Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC has been appointed as the initial operating advisor with respect to all of the mortgage loans other than any non-serviced mortgage loan and any servicing shift mortgage loan. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”. In the normal course of conducting its business, the initial operating advisor and its affiliates may have rendered services to, performed surveillance of, provided valuation services to, and negotiated with, numerous parties engaged in activities related to structured finance and commercial mortgage securitization. These parties may have included institutional investors, the depositor, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the master servicer,
125
the special servicer, the directing certificateholder, collateral property owners and their vendors or affiliates of any of those parties. Each of these relationships, to the extent they exist, may continue in the future and may involve a conflict of interest with respect to the initial operating advisor’s duties as operating advisor. We cannot assure you that the existence of these relationships and other relationships in the future will not impact the manner in which the initial operating advisor performs its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement.
Additionally, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates, in the ordinary course of their business, may in the future (a) perform for third parties contract underwriting services and advisory services as well as service or specially service mortgage loans and (b) acquire mortgage loans for their own account, including, in each such case, mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. The real mortgaged properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. Consequently, personnel of Park Bridge Lender Services LLC may perform services, on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity at the same time as they are performing services with respect to, or while Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates are holding, other mortgage loans secured by mortgaged properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. This may pose inherent conflicts for Park Bridge Lender Services LLC. Although the operating advisor is required to consider the servicing standard in connection with its activities under the pooling and servicing agreement, the operating advisor will not itself be bound by the servicing standard.
In addition, the operating advisor and its affiliates may acquire or have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders if the operating advisor or any of its affiliates has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower, a parent or a sponsor of a borrower, a servicer or any of their affiliates. Each of these relationships may also create a conflict of interest. See also See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor—Eligibility of Operating Advisor”.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Asset Representations Reviewer
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC has been appointed as the initial asset representations reviewer with respect to all of the mortgage loans. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and the Asset Representations Reviewer”. In the normal course of conducting its business, the initial asset representations reviewer and its affiliates may have rendered services to, performed surveillance of, provided valuation services to, and negotiated with, numerous parties engaged in activities related to structured finance and commercial mortgage securitization. These parties may have included institutional investors, the depositor, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, the directing certificateholder, mortgaged collateral property owners and their vendors or affiliates of any of those parties. Each of these relationships, to the extent they exist, may continue in the future and may involve a conflict of interest with respect to the initial asset representations reviewer’s duties as asset representations reviewer. We cannot assure you that the existence of these relationships and other relationships in the future will not impact the manner in which the initial asset representations reviewer performs its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement.
126
Additionally, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates, in the ordinary course of their business, may in the future (a) perform for third parties contract underwriting services and advisory services as well as service or specially service mortgage loans and (b) acquire mortgage loans for their own account, including, in each such case, mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. The real mortgaged properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. Consequently, personnel of Park Bridge Lender Services LLC may perform services, on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity at the same time as they are performing services with respect to, or while Park Bridge Lender Services LLC or its affiliates are holding, other mortgage loans secured by mortgaged properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. This may pose inherent conflicts for Park Bridge Lender Services LLC.
In addition, the asset representations reviewer and its affiliates may acquire or have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders if the asset representations reviewer or any of its affiliates has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower, a parent or a sponsor of a borrower, a servicer or any of their affiliates. Each of these relationships may also create a conflict of interest.
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Certificateholder and the Companion Holders
It is expected that KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P., or its affiliate will be appointed as the initial directing certificateholder. The special servicer may, at the direction of the directing certificateholder (for so long as a control termination event does not exist and is not continuing and, at all times, other than with respect to certain excluded loans) or, in the case of the servicing shift mortgage loans, at the direction of the related controlling noteholder, prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date, take actions with respect to the specially serviced loans under the pooling and servicing agreement that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. The directing certificateholder will be controlled by the controlling class certificateholders.
The controlling class certificateholders and the holder of any companion loan or securities backed by such companion loan may have interests in conflict with those of the other certificateholders. As a result, it is possible (i) that the directing certificateholder on behalf of the controlling class certificateholders (for so long as a control termination event does not exist and, at all times, other than with respect to any applicable excluded loans or non-serviced whole loans), (ii) the respective controlling noteholders of the CrossPoint whole loan or the City Square and Clay Street whole loan, in each case prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date or (iii) the directing certificateholder (or equivalent entity) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan, may direct the special servicer or the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement relating to the applicable other securitization transaction, as the case may be, to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates.
127
Set forth below is the identity of the initial directing certificateholder (or equivalent entity) for each non-serviced whole loan, the securitization trust or other entity holding the controlling note in such non-serviced whole loan and the pooling and servicing agreement under which it is being serviced.
Whole Loan(1) |
Non-Serviced PSA |
Controlling Noteholder |
Initial Directing Certificateholder(2) |
AFIN Portfolio | UBS 2017-C7(3) | UBS 2017-C7(3) | Prime Finance CMBS B-Piece Holdco XV, LP |
BlueLinx Portfolio | BMARK 2018-B2(4) | BMARK 2018-B2(4) | Barings LLC(4) |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | CSAIL 2017-CX10 | CSAIL 2017-CX10 | Eightfold Real Estate Capital Fund V, L.P. |
(1) | Does not include the CrossPoint whole loan or the City Square and Clay Street whole loan, servicing for which will be transferred on the related servicing shift securitization date. The initial controlling noteholder of the CrossPoint whole loan will be Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. or an affiliate thereof, as holder of the related controlling companion loan. The initial controlling noteholder for the City Square and Clay Street whole loan will be Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate thereof, as holder of the related controlling companion loan. With respect to each such whole loan, on and after the related servicing shift securitization date, the controlling noteholder of such whole loan will be the securitization trust into which the related controlling companion loan is deposited. The initial directing certificateholder on and after such servicing shift securitization date is expected to be the controlling class representative or other directing certificateholder under the securitization into which the related controlling companion loan was deposited. |
(2) | As of the closing date of the related securitization. |
(3) | After the securitization of the related controlling pari passu companion loan, the related whole loan will be serviced under the related pooling and servicing agreement for that securitization transaction (and by the service provider parties thereto). |
(4) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan will be subject to the pooling and servicing agreement governing the BMARK 2018-B2 securitization which is expected to close contemporaneously with the UBS 2018-C8 securitization. |
The controlling noteholder or directing certificateholder indicated in the chart above has certain consent and/or consultation rights with respect to the related non-serviced whole loan under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of that non-serviced whole loan. Such controlling noteholder or directing certificateholder does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates and may have similar conflicts of interest with the holders of other certificates backed by the companion loans. As a result, it is possible that a non-serviced companion loan holder (solely with respect to the related non-serviced whole loan) may advise a non-serviced special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates. However, such non-serviced special servicer is not permitted to take actions that are prohibited by law or that violate its servicing standard or the terms of the related mortgage loan documents. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”. In addition, except as limited by certain conditions described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”, a non-serviced special servicer may be replaced by the related directing certificateholder or controlling noteholder with or without cause at any time, for so long as a control termination event (or its equivalent) does not exist (or, in the case of a servicing shift mortgage loan, prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date, by the holder of the controlling companion loan at any time, for cause or without cause). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement —Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
With respect to a servicing shift whole loan, prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date, the related controlling companion loan holder will have certain consent and/or consultation rights, and the related non-controlling companion loan holders will have non-binding consultation rights, in each case with respect to such servicing shift whole loan
128
under the pooling and servicing agreement. Such companion loan holders do not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates and may have similar conflicts of interest with the holders of other certificates backed by the companion loans, if any. As a result, it is possible that such controlling companion loan holder (solely with respect to the related servicing shift whole loan and prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date) may advise the applicable special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates. Additionally, it is possible that such non-controlling companion loan holder (solely with respect to the related servicing shift whole loan and prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date) may, on a strictly non-binding basis, consult with the applicable special servicer and recommend that such special servicer take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates. Accordingly, prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date, the applicable special servicer may take actions with respect to the related servicing shift whole loan that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, to the extent described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. However, such special servicer is not permitted to take actions that are prohibited by law or that violate its servicing standard or the terms of the related mortgage loan documents. On and after the related servicing shift securitization date, the related servicing shift whole loan will become a non-serviced whole loan and, thereafter, be subject to the conflicts described herein applicable to non-serviced mortgage loans. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement —Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
With respect to serviced pari passu whole loans other than any servicing shift whole loan, the special servicer, upon strictly non-binding consultation with a serviced companion loan holder or its representative, may take actions with respect to the related serviced pari passu whole loan that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, to the extent described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. In connection with a pari passu whole loan serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization, a serviced companion loan holder does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, and it may have interests in conflict with those of the certificateholders. As a result, it is possible that a serviced companion loan holder with respect to a serviced pari passu whole loan other than any servicing shift whole loan (solely with respect to the related serviced pari passu whole loan) may, on a strictly non-binding basis, consult with the special servicer and recommend that the special servicer take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates. However, the special servicer is not required to follow such recommendations and is not permitted to take actions that are prohibited by law or that violate the servicing standard or the terms of the mortgage loan documents and is otherwise under no obligation to take direction from a serviced companion loan holder. In addition, except as limited by certain conditions described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events”, the special servicer may be replaced by the directing certificateholder for cause at any time and without cause (for so long as a control termination event does not exist and other than in respect of any excluded loan). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder” and “—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events”. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to a servicing shift whole loan, prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date, the special servicer may be replaced by the holder of the related controlling companion loan at any time, for cause or without cause.
The directing certificateholder, any controlling noteholder or their respective affiliates (and the directing certificateholder (or equivalent entity) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan and any of its respective
129
affiliates) (or, after a servicing shift securitization date, the securitization trust and directing certificateholder thereunder for the related controlling companion loan) may have interests that are in conflict with those of certain certificateholders, especially if the applicable directing certificateholder, controlling noteholder or any of their respective affiliates holds certificates or companion loan securities, or has financial interests in or other financial dealings (as lender or otherwise) with a borrower or an affiliate of a borrower. In order to minimize the effect of certain of these conflicts of interest, for so long as any borrower party is the directing certificateholder or the holder of the majority of the controlling class (any such mortgage loan referred to herein as an “excluded loan”), the directing certificateholder will not have consent or consultation rights solely with respect to such excluded loan (however, the directing certificateholder will be provided certain notices and certain information relating to any such excluded loan as described in the pooling and servicing agreement). In addition, for so long as any borrower party is the directing certificateholder or a controlling class certificateholder, as applicable, the directing certificateholder or such controlling class certificateholder, as applicable, will not be given access to any “excluded information” solely relating to any such mortgage loan and/or the related mortgaged properties pursuant to the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement. Notwithstanding those restrictions, there can be no assurance that the directing certificateholder or any controlling class certificateholder will not obtain sensitive information related to the strategy of any contemplated workout or liquidation related to an excluded loan or otherwise seek to exert its influence over the special servicer in the event an excluded loan becomes subject to a workout or liquidation. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest.
Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans
The anticipated initial investor in the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates, which is referred to in this prospectus as the “third party purchaser” (see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder—General”), was required under the credit risk retention rules to perform due diligence on the mortgage loans originally identified by the sponsors for inclusion in the issuing entity. See “Credit Risk Retention—General”. In addition, the third party purchaser was given the opportunity to request the removal, re-sizing or change in the expected repayment dates or other features of some or all of the mortgage loans. The mortgage pool as originally proposed by the sponsors was adjusted based on certain of these requests. In addition, the b-piece buyer received or may have received price adjustments or cost mitigation arrangements in connection with accepting certain mortgage loans in the mortgage pool.
We cannot assure you that you or another investor would have made the same requests to modify the original pool as the third party purchaser or that the final pool as influenced by the third party purchaser’s feedback will not adversely affect the performance of your certificates and benefit the performance of the third party purchaser’s certificates. Because of the differing subordination levels, the third party purchaser has interests that may, in some circumstances, differ from those of purchasers of other classes of certificates, and may desire a portfolio composition that benefits the third party purchaser but that does not benefit other investors. In addition, while the third party purchaser is prohibited under the credit risk retention rules to enter into hedging arrangements and certain other transactions, it may nonetheless otherwise have business objectives that could cause its interests with respect to the mortgage pool to diverge from those of other purchasers of the certificates. The third party purchaser performed due diligence solely for its own benefit and has no liability to any person or entity for conducting its due diligence. The third party purchaser is not required to take into account the interests of any other investor in the
130
certificates in exercising remedies or voting or other rights in its capacity as owner of its certificates or in making requests or recommendations to the sponsors as to the selection of the mortgage loans and the establishment of other transaction terms. Investors are not entitled to rely on in any way the third party purchaser’s acceptance of a mortgage loan. The third party purchaser’s acceptance of a mortgage loan does not constitute, and may not be construed as, an endorsement of such mortgage loan, the underwriting for such mortgage loan or the originator of such mortgage loan.
The third party purchaser will have no liability to any certificateholder for any actions taken by it as described in the preceding two paragraphs and the pooling and servicing agreement will provide that each certificateholder, by its acceptance of a certificate, waives any claims against such buyers in respect of such actions.
The third party purchaser is expected to appoint KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P., or its affiliate as the initial directing certificateholder. The directing certificateholder will have certain rights to direct and consult with the master servicer and the special servicer. In addition, the directing certificateholder will generally have certain consultation rights with regard to the non-serviced mortgage loans under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced whole loan and the related intercreditor agreement, and with regard to a servicing shift whole loan following the applicable servicing shift securitization date, under the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such servicing shift whole loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans—Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder”, and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans—Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan—Consultation and Control”.
Because the incentives and actions of the third party purchaser may, in some circumstances, differ from or be adverse to those of purchasers of the offered certificates, you are advised and encouraged to make your own investment decision based on a careful review of the information set forth in this prospectus and your own view of the mortgage pool.
Conflicts of Interest May Occur as a Result of the Rights of the Applicable Directing Certificateholder To Terminate the Special Servicer of the Applicable Whole Loan
With respect to any whole loan, the directing certificateholder exercising control rights over that whole loan (or, (i) with respect to any mortgage loan with one or more subordinate companion loans, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a “control appraisal period” or “control termination event” with respect to the related subordinate companion loan, the holder of the related subordinate companion loan and (ii) with respect to any servicing shift whole loan, prior to the servicing shift securitization date, the holder of the related controlling companion loan) will be entitled, under certain circumstances, to remove the special servicer under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such whole loan and, in such circumstances, appoint a successor special servicer for such whole loan (or have certain consent rights with respect to such removal or replacement). The party with this appointment power may have special relationships or interests that conflict with those of the holders of one or more classes of certificates. In addition, that party does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, may act solely in its own interests, and will have no liability to any certificateholders for having done so. No certificateholder may take any action against the directing certificateholder or, with respect to a servicing shift whole loan, the holder of the related controlling companion loan, under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization or under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan, or against
131
any other parties for having acted solely in their respective interests. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” for a description of these rights to terminate the special servicer.
Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment
The managers of the mortgaged properties and the borrowers may experience conflicts in the management and/or ownership of the mortgaged properties because:
● | a substantial number of the mortgaged properties are managed by property managers affiliated with the respective borrowers; |
● | these property managers also may manage and/or franchise additional properties, including properties that may compete with the mortgaged properties; and |
● | affiliates of the managers and/or the borrowers, or the managers and/or the borrowers themselves, also may own other properties, including competing properties. |
None of the borrowers, property managers or any of their affiliates or any employees of the foregoing has any duty to favor the leasing of space in the mortgaged properties over the leasing of space in other properties, one or more of which may be adjacent to or near the mortgaged properties.
Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.
Other Risks Relating to the Certificates
The Certificates Are Limited Obligations
The certificates, when issued, will only represent ownership interests in the issuing entity. The certificates will not represent an interest in or obligation of, and will not be guaranteed by, the sponsors, the depositor, or any other person. The primary assets of the issuing entity will be the mortgage loans, and distributions on any class of certificates will depend solely on the amount and timing of payments and other collections in respect of the mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that the cash flow from the mortgaged properties and the proceeds of any sale or refinancing of the mortgaged properties will be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest on, the mortgage loans or to distribute in full the amounts of interest and principal to which the certificateholders will be entitled. See “Description of the Certificates—General”.
The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline
Your certificates will not be listed on any national securities exchange or traded on any automated quotation systems of any registered securities association, and there is currently no secondary market for your certificates. The underwriters have no obligation to make a market in the offered certificates. We cannot assure you that an active secondary market for the certificates will develop. Additionally, one or more investors may purchase substantial portions of one or more classes of certificates. Accordingly, you may not have an active or liquid secondary market for your certificates.
132
The market value of the certificates will also be influenced by the supply of and demand for CMBS generally. A number of factors will affect investors’ demand for CMBS, including:
● | the availability of alternative investments that offer higher yields or are perceived as being a better credit risk than CMBS, or as having a less volatile market value or being more liquid than CMBS; |
● | legal and other restrictions that prohibit a particular entity from investing in CMBS or limit the amount or types of CMBS that it may acquire or require it to maintain increased capital or reserves as a result of its investment in CMBS; |
● | increased regulatory compliance burdens imposed on CMBS or securitizations generally, or on classes of securitizers, that may make securitization a less attractive financing option for commercial mortgage loans; and |
● | investors’ perceptions of commercial real estate lending or CMBS, which may be adversely affected by, among other things, a decline in real estate values or an increase in defaults and foreclosures on commercial mortgage loans. |
We cannot assure you that your certificates will not decline in value.
Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates
We make no representation as to the proper characterization of the offered certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, financial reporting or other purposes, as to the ability of particular investors to purchase the offered certificates under applicable legal investment or other restrictions or as to the consequences of an investment in the offered certificates for such purposes or under such restrictions. Changes in federal banking and securities laws and other laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on issuers, investors, or other participants in the asset-backed securities markets including the CMBS market and may have adverse effects on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the certificates. While the general effects of such changes are uncertain, regulatory or legislative provisions applicable to certain investors may have the effect of limiting or restricting their ability to hold or acquire CMBS, which in turn may adversely affect the ability of investors in the offered certificates who are not subject to those provisions to resell their certificates in the secondary market. For example:
● | Recent changes in federal banking and securities laws, including those resulting from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enacted in the United States, may have an adverse effect on issuers, investors, or other participants in the asset-backed securities markets. In particular, new capital regulations were issued by the U.S. banking regulators in July 2013; these regulations implement the increased capital requirements established under the Basel Accord and are being phased in over time. These new capital regulations eliminate reliance on credit ratings and otherwise alter, and in most cases increase, the capital requirements imposed on depository institutions and their holding companies, including with respect to ownership of asset-backed securities such as CMBS. Further changes in capital requirements have been announced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and it is uncertain when such changes will be implemented in the United States. When fully implemented in the United States, these changes may have an adverse effect with respect to investments in asset-backed securities, including CMBS. As a result of these regulations, investments in CMBS such as the certificates by financial |
133
institutions subject to bank capital regulations may result in greater capital charges to these financial institutions and these new regulations may otherwise adversely affect the treatment of CMBS for their regulatory capital purposes. |
● | Regulations were adopted on December 10, 2013 to implement Section 619 of the Dodd Frank Act (such statutory provision, together with such implementing regulations, the “Volcker Rule”). The Volcker Rule generally prohibits “banking entities” (which is broadly defined to include U.S. banks and bank holding companies and many non-U.S. banking entities, together with their respective subsidiaries and other affiliates) from (i) engaging in proprietary trading, (ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a “covered fund” and (iii) entering into certain relationships with such funds. The Volcker Rule became effective on July 21, 2012. Subject to certain exceptions, banking entities are required to be in conformance with the Volcker Rule by July 21, 2015. Under the Volcker Rule, unless otherwise jointly determined otherwise by specified federal regulators, a “covered fund” does not include an issuer that may rely on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act other than the exclusions contained in Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. |
The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption under the Investment Company Act contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. Accordingly, the issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule. The general effects of the Volcker Rule remain uncertain. Any prospective investor in the certificates, including a U.S. or foreign bank or a subsidiary or other bank affiliate, should consult its own legal advisors regarding such matters and other effects of the Volcker Rule. |
● | The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted changes to the accounting standards for structured products. These changes, or any future changes, may affect the accounting for entities such as the issuing entity, could under certain circumstances require an investor or its owner generally to consolidate the assets of the issuing entity in its financial statements and record third parties’ investments in the issuing entity as liabilities of that investor or owner or could otherwise adversely affect the manner in which the investor or its owner must report an investment in CMBS for financial reporting purposes. |
● | For purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended, no class of offered certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities”. |
● | In addition, compliance with legal requirements, such as the credit risk retention regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, could cause commercial real estate lenders to tighten their lending standards and reduce the availability of debt financing for commercial real estate borrowers. This, in turn, may adversely affect a borrower’s ability to refinance the related mortgage loan or sell the related mortgaged property on such mortgage loan’s maturity date. We cannot assure you that a borrower will be able to generate sufficient cash from the sale or refinancing of the related mortgaged property to make the balloon payment on such mortgage loan. |
Further changes in federal banking and securities laws and other laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on issuers, investors, or other participants in the asset-backed
134
securities markets (including the CMBS market) and may have adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the certificates.
Accordingly, all investors whose investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities should consult with their own legal, accounting and other advisors in determining whether, and to what extent, the offered certificates will constitute legal investments for them or are subject to investment or other restrictions, unfavorable accounting treatment, capital charges or reserve requirements. See “Legal Investment”.
EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements
Investors should be aware of the risk retention and due diligence requirements in Europe (the “EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements”) which currently apply, or are expected to apply in the future, in respect of various types of EU regulated investors including credit institutions, authorized alternative investment fund managers, investment firms, insurance and reinsurance undertakings, management companies and funds regulated pursuant to the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive and institutions for occupational retirement provision. Among other things, such requirements restrict an investor who is subject to the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements from investing in securitizations unless: (i) the originator, sponsor or original lender in respect of the relevant securitization has explicitly disclosed that it will retain, on an on-going basis, a net economic interest of not less than five percent in respect of certain specified credit risk tranches or securitized exposures; and (ii) such investor is able to demonstrate that they have undertaken certain due diligence in respect of various matters including but not limited to its note position, the underlying assets and (in the case of certain types of investors) the relevant sponsor or originator. Failure to comply with one or more of the requirements may result in various penalties including, in the case of those investors subject to regulatory capital requirements, the imposition of a punitive capital charge on the offered certificates acquired by the relevant investor.
With effect from 1 January 2019, the current EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements will be replaced by those contained in the Securitization Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/2402) (the “Securitization Regulation”). Investors should be aware that there are material differences between the current EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements and those in the Securitization Regulation. The Securitization Regulation will, amongst other things, apply also to (a) undertakings for collective investment in transferrable securities regulated pursuant to Directive (EU) 2009/65/EC and the management companies thereof (together, “UCITS”), and (b) institutions for occupational retirement provision falling within the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/2341 (subject to certain exceptions), and certain investment managers and authorized entities appointed by such institutions (together, “IORPs”). With regard to a securitization in respect of which the relevant securities are issued prior to 1 January 2019 (a “Pre-2019 Securitization”), as is the case with the offered certificates, affected investors will continue to be subject to the current investment restrictions and due diligence requirements (and will not be subject to the provisions of the Securitization Regulation in that respect), including on and after that date. However, the Securitization Regulation makes no express provision as to the application of any investment restrictions or due diligence requirements, whether under the current requirements or under the Securitization Regulation, to UCITS or IORPs that hold or acquire any interest in respect of a Pre-2019 Securitization; and, accordingly, it is not known what requirements (if any) may be applicable thereto. Certain aspects of the Securitization Regulation will be supplemented by regulatory technical standards that have not been published or that have only been published in draft form and are not yet final.
135
Prospective investors are themselves responsible for monitoring and assessing changes to the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements and their regulatory capital requirements.
None of the sponsors, the depositor or the underwriters intends to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization constituted by the issue of the offered certificates in accordance with the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements or to take any other action which may be required by EEA-regulated investors for the purposes of their compliance with the EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements or similar requirements. Consequently, the offered certificates may not be a suitable investment for EEA-credit institutions, investment firms or the other types of EEA regulated investors mentioned above. As a result, the price and liquidity of the offered certificates in the secondary market may be adversely affected. EEA-regulated investors are encouraged to consult with their own investment and legal advisors regarding the suitability of the offered certificates for investment. None of the issuing entity, the depositor, the underwriters and any other party to the transaction makes any representation to any prospective investor or purchaser of the offered certificates regarding the regulatory treatment of their investment in the offered certificates on the closing date or at any time in the future.
Bail-In Rules May Affect the Liabilities of Certain Sponsors, Including their Obligations to Repurchase Mortgage Loans
Société Générale and Barclays Bank PLC, each a sponsor, may be subject to the “bail-in” powers of national authorities in EU member states (each a “Resolution Authority”) and such sponsor’s liabilities, including the obligation to repurchase certain defective mortgage loans could, among other things, be reduced, converted or extinguished in full. Alternatively the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (2014/59/EU), collectively with secondary and implementing EU rules, and national implementing legislation (the “BRRD”) gives the power to a Resolution Authority to transfer the assets of certain relevant institutions to a third party entity.
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded
Ratings assigned to the offered certificates by the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor:
● | are based on, among other things, the economic characteristics of the mortgaged properties and other relevant structural features of the transaction; |
● | do not represent any assessment of the yield to maturity that a certificateholder may experience; |
● | reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies as of the date such ratings were issued; |
● | may be reviewed, revised, suspended, downgraded, qualified or withdrawn entirely by the applicable rating agency as a result of changes in or unavailability of information; |
● | may have been determined based on criteria that included an analysis of historical mortgage loan data that may not reflect future experience; |
136
● | may reflect assumptions by such rating agencies regarding performance of the mortgage loans that are not accurate, as evidenced by the significant amount of downgrades, qualifications and withdrawals of ratings assigned to previously issued CMBS by the hired rating agencies and other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations during the recent credit crisis; and |
● | do not consider to what extent the offered certificates will be subject to prepayment or that the outstanding principal amount of any class of offered certificates will be prepaid. |
The nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that assign ratings to any class of offered certificates will establish the amount of credit support, if any, for such class of offered certificates based on, among other things, an assumed level of defaults, delinquencies and losses with respect to the mortgage loans. Actual losses may, however, exceed the assumed levels. If actual losses on the mortgage loans exceed the assumed levels, you may be required to bear the additional losses.
In addition, the rating of any class of offered certificates below an investment grade rating by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, whether upon initial issuance of such class of certificates or as a result of a ratings downgrade, could adversely affect the ability of an employee benefit plan or other investor to purchase or retain those offered certificates. See “Certain ERISA Considerations” and “Legal Investment”.
Nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that were not engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of offered certificates, relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from any ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor. The issuance of unsolicited ratings by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization on a class of the offered certificates that are lower than ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class.
As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the offered certificates, the depositor, the loan sellers or affiliates thereof had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Based on preliminary feedback from those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations at that time, the depositor selected those three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate certain classes of the certificates. If the depositor had selected other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate the certificates, we cannot assure you that the ratings such other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations would have assigned to the certificates would not have been lower than the ratings assigned by the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor. Further, in the case of one nationally recognized statistical rating organization engaged by the depositor, the depositor only requested ratings for certain classes of offered certificates, due in part to the final subordination levels provided by such nationally recognized statistical rating organization for such classes of certificates. If the depositor had selected such nationally recognized statistical rating organization to rate those classes of offered certificates not rated by it, such ratings on those other certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to those certificates by the other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations hired by the depositor. In addition, the decision not to engage one or more other rating agencies in the rating of certain classes of certificates to be issued in connection with this transaction may negatively impact the
137
liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of those classes of certificates. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the depositor. Neither the depositor nor any other person or entity will have any duty to notify you if any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization issues, or delivers notice of its intention to issue, consolidated ratings on one or more classes of certificates after the date of this prospectus.
Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission may determine that any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates no longer qualifies as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization, or is no longer qualified to rate the certificates or may no longer rate similar securities for a limited period as a result of an enforcement action, and that determination may also have an adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the offered certificates. To the extent that the provisions of any mortgage loan or the pooling and servicing agreement condition any action, event or circumstance on the delivery of a rating agency confirmation, the pooling and servicing agreement will require delivery or deemed delivery of a rating agency confirmation only from the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates or, in the case of a serviced whole loan, any related companion loan securities.
In August 2011, S&P Global Ratings downgraded the U.S. Government’s credit rating from “AAA” to “AA+”. In the event that S&P Global Ratings is engaged by the depositor and thereafter elects pursuant to the transaction documents not to review, declines to review, or otherwise waives its review of one or more proposed defeasances of mortgage loans included in the trust and for which defeasance is permitted under the related loan documents, the transaction documents would then permit the related borrower to defease any such mortgage loan without actually obtaining a rating agency confirmation from S&P Global Ratings. Subsequent to any such defeasance(s), there can be no assurance that S&P Global Ratings would not thereafter decrease the ratings, if any, which it has assigned to the certificates.
We are not obligated to maintain any particular rating with respect to the certificates, and the ratings initially assigned to the certificates by any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates could change adversely as a result of changes affecting, among other things, the mortgage loans, the mortgaged properties, the parties to the pooling and servicing agreement, or as a result of changes to ratings criteria employed by any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates. Although these changes would not necessarily be or result from an event of default on any mortgage loan, any adverse change to the ratings of the offered certificates would likely have an adverse effect on the market value, liquidity and/or regulatory characteristics of those certificates.
Further, certain actions provided for in loan agreements may require a rating agency confirmation be obtained from the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the certificates and, in the case of a serviced whole loan, any companion loan securities as a precondition to taking such action. In certain circumstances, this condition may be deemed to have been met or waived without such a rating agency confirmation being obtained. In the event such an action is taken without a rating agency confirmation being obtained, we cannot assure you that the applicable rating agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of the taking of such action. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—”Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions”, “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Rating Agency Confirmations” and “Ratings”
138
for additional considerations regarding the ratings, including a description of the process of obtaining confirmations of ratings for the offered certificates.
Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors
General
The yield to maturity on each class of offered certificates will depend in part on the following:
● | the purchase price for the certificates; |
● | the rate and timing of principal payments on the mortgage loans (both voluntary and involuntary), and the allocation of principal prepayments to the respective classes of offered certificates with certificate balances; and |
● | the allocation of shortfalls and losses on the mortgage loans to the respective classes of offered certificates. |
For this purpose, principal payments include voluntary and involuntary prepayments, such as prepayments resulting from the application of loan reserves, property releases, casualty or condemnation (including full repayment of the loan without yield maintenance following partial casualty and the lender’s application of available proceeds to the debt), defaults and liquidations as well as principal payments resulting from repurchases due to material breaches of representations and warranties or material document defects or purchases by a companion loan holder or mezzanine lender (if any) pursuant to a purchase option or sales of defaulted mortgage loans.
Any changes in the weighted average lives of your certificates may adversely affect your yield. In general, if you buy a certificate at a premium or any of the Class X-A or Class X-B certificates, and principal distributions occur faster than expected, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected. If principal distributions are very high, holders of certificates purchased at a premium or any of the Class X-A or Class X-B certificates might not fully recover their initial investment. Conversely, if you buy a certificate at a discount (other than any of the Class X-A or Class X-B certificates) and principal distributions occur more slowly than expected, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected.
Prepayments resulting in a shortening of weighted average lives of your certificates may be made at a time of low interest rates when you may be unable to reinvest the resulting payment of principal on your certificates at a rate comparable to the effective yield anticipated by you in making your investment in the certificates, while delays and extensions resulting in a lengthening of those weighted average lives may occur at a time of high interest rates when you may have been able to reinvest principal payments that would otherwise have been received by you at higher rates.
In addition, the extent to which prepayments on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity ultimately affect the weighted average life of the certificates will depend on the terms of the certificates, more particularly:
● | a class of certificates that entitles the holders of those certificates to a disproportionately larger share of the prepayments on the mortgage loans increases the “call risk” or the likelihood of early retirement of that class if the rate of prepayment is relatively fast; and |
139
● | a class of certificates that entitles the holders of the certificates to a disproportionately smaller share of the prepayments on the mortgage loans increases the likelihood of “extension risk” or an extended average life of that class if the rate of prepayment is relatively slow. |
The Timing of Prepayments and Repurchases May Change Your Anticipated Yield
The rate at which voluntary prepayments occur on the mortgage loans will be affected by a variety of factors, including:
● | the terms of the mortgage loans, including, the length of any prepayment lockout period and the applicable yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums and the extent to which the related mortgage loan terms may be practically enforced; |
● | the level of prevailing interest rates; |
● | the availability of credit for commercial real estate; |
● | the master servicer’s or special servicer’s ability to enforce yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums; |
● | the failure to meet certain requirements for the release of escrows; |
● | the occurrence of casualties or natural disasters; and |
● | economic, demographic, tax, legal or other factors. |
Although a yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium provision of a mortgage loan is intended to create an economic disincentive for a borrower to prepay voluntarily a mortgage loan, we cannot assure you that mortgage loans that have such provisions will not prepay.
The extent to which the special servicer forecloses upon, takes title to and disposes of any mortgaged property related to a mortgage loan or sells defaulted mortgage loans will affect the weighted average lives of your certificates. If the special servicer forecloses upon a significant number of the related mortgage loans, and depending upon the amount and timing of recoveries from the related mortgaged properties or sells defaulted mortgage loans, your certificates may have a shorter weighted average life.
Delays in liquidations of defaulted mortgage loans and modifications extending the maturity of mortgage loans will tend to delay the payment of principal on the mortgage loans. The ability of the related borrower to make any required balloon payment typically will depend upon its ability either to refinance the mortgage loan or to sell the related mortgaged property. A significant number of the mortgage loans require balloon payments at maturity or have substantial principal balances outstanding on the related anticipated repayment date and there is a risk that a number of those mortgage loans may default at maturity or otherwise not be repaid on the related anticipated repayment date, or that the special servicer may extend the maturity of a number of those mortgage loans in connection with workouts. We cannot assure you as to the borrowers’ abilities to make mortgage loan payments on a full and timely basis, including any balloon payments at maturity, or to otherwise repay a mortgage loan on any related anticipated repayment date. Bankruptcy of the borrower or adverse conditions in the market where the mortgaged property is located may, among other things, delay the recovery of proceeds in the case of defaults. Losses on the mortgage loans due to uninsured risks or insufficient hazard insurance proceeds may
140
create shortfalls in distributions to certificateholders. Any required indemnification of a party to the pooling and servicing agreement in connection with legal actions relating to the issuing entity, the related agreements or the certificates may also result in shortfalls.
See “—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions” above and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion”.
In addition, if a sponsor repurchases a mortgage loan from the issuing entity due to a material breach of one or more of its representations or warranties or a material document defect, the repurchase price paid will be passed through to the holders of the certificates with the same effect as if the mortgage loan had been prepaid in part or in full, and no yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium would be payable. Additionally, any mezzanine lender (if any) may have the option to purchase the related mortgage loan after certain defaults, and the purchase price may not include any yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums. As a result of such a repurchase or purchase, investors in the Class X-A and Class X-B certificates and any other certificates purchased at a premium might not fully recoup their initial investment. A repurchase, a prepayment or the exercise of a purchase option may adversely affect the yield to maturity on your certificates. In this respect, see “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans”.
The certificates with notional amounts will not be entitled to distributions of principal but instead will accrue interest on their respective notional amounts. Because the notional amount of the certificates indicated in the table below is based upon the outstanding certificate balances of the related class of certificates, the yield to maturity on the indicated certificates will be extremely sensitive to the rate and timing of prepayments of principal, liquidations and principal losses on the mortgage loans to the extent allocated to the related certificates.
Interest-Only Class of Certificates |
Underlying Classes |
Class X-A | Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates |
Class X-B | Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates |
In particular, the Class X-A certificates (and to a lesser extent, the Class X-B certificates) will be sensitive to prepayments on the mortgage loans because the prepayments will have the effect of reducing the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates first. A rapid rate of principal prepayments, liquidations and/or principal losses on the mortgage loans could result in the failure to recoup the initial investment in the Class X-A and/or Class X-B certificates. Investors in the Class X-A or Class X-B certificates should fully consider the associated risks, including the risk that an extremely rapid rate of amortization, prepayment or other liquidation of the mortgage loans could result in the failure of such investors to recoup fully their initial investments. The yield to maturity of the certificates with notional amounts may be adversely affected by the prepayment of mortgage loans with higher net mortgage loan rates. See “Yield and Maturity Considerations—Yield on the Certificates with Notional Amounts”.
141
In addition, with respect to the Class A-SB certificates, the extent to which the planned balances are achieved and the sensitivity of the Class A-SB certificates to principal prepayments on the mortgage loans will depend in part on the period of time during which the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates remain outstanding. As such, the Class A-SB certificates will become more sensitive to the rate of prepayments on the mortgage loans than they were when the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates were outstanding.
Your Yield May be Adversely Affected By Prepayments Resulting From Earnout Reserves
With respect to certain mortgage loans, earnout escrows may have been established at origination, which funds may be released to the related borrower upon satisfaction of certain conditions. If such conditions with respect to any such mortgage loan are not satisfied, the amounts reserved in such escrows may be, or may be required to be, applied to the payment of the mortgage loan, which would have the same effect on the offered certificates as a prepayment of the mortgage loan, except that such application of funds would not be accompanied by any prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge. See Annex A-1. The pooling and servicing agreement will provide that unless required by the mortgage loan documents, the master servicer will not apply such amounts as a prepayment if no event of default has occurred.
Losses and Shortfalls May Change Your Anticipated Yield
If losses on the mortgage loans exceed the aggregate certificate balance of the classes of certificates subordinated to a particular class, that class will suffer a loss equal to the full amount of the excess (up to the outstanding certificate balance of that class). Even if losses on the mortgage loans are not borne by your certificates, those losses may affect the weighted average life and yield to maturity of your certificates.
For example, certain shortfalls in interest as a result of involuntary prepayments may reduce the funds available to make payments on your certificates. In addition, if the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee reimburses itself (or the master servicer, special servicer, trustee or other party to a pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan) out of general collections on the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity for any advance that it (or any such other party) has determined is not recoverable out of collections on the related mortgage loan, then to the extent that this reimbursement is made from collections of principal on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal ultimately available to be distributed on the certificates and will result in a reduction of the certificate balance (or notional amount) of a class of certificates. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”. Likewise, if the master servicer or the trustee reimburses itself out of principal collections on the mortgage loans for any workout-delayed reimbursement amounts, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal available to be distributed on the certificates, on that distribution date. This reimbursement would have the effect of reducing current payments of principal on the offered certificates (other than the certificates with notional amounts and the Class R certificates) and extending the weighted average lives of the offered certificates with certificate balances. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”.
In addition, to the extent losses are realized on the mortgage loans, first the Class NR-RR certificates, then the Class F-RR certificates, then the Class E-RR certificates, then the Class D-RR certificates, then the Class D certificates, then the Class C certificates, then the Class B certificates, then the Class A-S certificates and, then, pro rata, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, based on their respective
142
certificate balances, will bear such losses up to an amount equal to the respective outstanding certificate balance of that class. A reduction in the certificate balance of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 or Class A-4 certificates will result in a corresponding reduction in the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates and a reduction of the certificate balance of the Class A-S, Class B or Class C certificates will result in a corresponding reduction of the notional amount of the Class X-B certificates. We make no representation as to the anticipated rate or timing of prepayments (voluntary or involuntary) or rate, timing or amount of liquidations or losses on the mortgage loans or as to the anticipated yield to maturity of any such offered certificate. See “Yield and Maturity Considerations”.
Risk of Early Termination
The issuing entity is subject to optional termination under certain circumstances. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”. In the event of this termination, you might receive some principal payments earlier than otherwise expected, which could adversely affect your anticipated yield to maturity.
Subordination of the Subordinated Certificates Will Affect the Timing of Distributions and the Application of Losses on the Subordinated Certificates
As described in this prospectus, the rights of the holders of Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates to receive payments of principal and interest otherwise payable on the certificates they hold will be subordinated to such rights of the holders of the more senior certificates having an earlier alphabetical or alphanumeric class designation. If you acquire any Class A-S, Class B or Class C certificates, then your rights to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on or in respect of the mortgage loans will generally be subordinated to those of the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class X-A and Class X-B certificates and, if your certificates are Class B or Class C certificates, to those of the holders of the Class A-S certificates and, if your certificates are Class C certificates, to those of the holders of the Class B certificates. See “Description of the Certificates”. As a result, investors in those classes of certificates that are subordinated in whole or part to other classes of certificates will generally bear the effects of losses on the mortgage loans and unreimbursed expenses of the issuing entity before the holders of such other classes of certificates. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions” and “—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses”.
Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and the Mortgage Loans Can Impact Your Investment
You Have Limited Voting Rights
Except as described in this prospectus, you and other certificateholders generally do not have a right to vote and do not have the right to make decisions with respect to the administration of the issuing entity and the mortgage loans. With respect to mortgage loans (other than any mortgage loan that will be serviced under a separate pooling and servicing agreement), those decisions are generally made, subject to the express terms of the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction, by the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable, subject to any rights of the directing certificateholder under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction and the rights of the holders of any related companion loan and mezzanine debt under the related intercreditor agreement. With respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan, you will generally not have any right to vote or make decisions with respect a non-serviced mortgage loan, and those decisions will generally be made by the master servicer or the
143
special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan and the related companion loan, subject to the rights of the directing certificateholder appointed under such pooling and servicing agreement. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”. In particular, with respect to the risks relating to a modification of a mortgage loan, see “—Risks Relating to Modifications of the Mortgage Loans” below.
In certain limited circumstances where certificateholders have the right to vote on matters affecting the issuing entity, in some cases, these votes are by certificateholders taken as a whole and in others the vote is by class. Your interests as an owner of certificates of a particular class may not be aligned with the interests of owners of one or more other classes of certificates in connection with any such vote. In addition, in all cases voting is based on the outstanding certificate balance, which is reduced by realized losses. In certain cases with respect to the termination of the special servicer and the operating advisor, certain voting rights will also be reduced by appraisal reduction amounts, as described below. These limitations on voting could adversely affect your ability to protect your interests with respect to matters voted on by certificateholders. See “Description of the Certificates—Voting Rights”. You will have no rights to vote on any servicing matters related to the mortgage loan that will be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced whole loan.
In general, a certificate beneficially owned by any borrower affiliate, any property manager, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, any mortgage loan seller or respective affiliates or agents will be deemed not to be outstanding and a holder of such certificate will not have the right to vote, subject to certain exceptions, as further described in the definition of “Certificateholder” under “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information—Certificate Administrator Reports”.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Class Z certificates will not have any voting rights.
The Rights of the Directing Certificateholder and the Operating Advisor Could Adversely Affect Your Investment
The directing certificateholder will have certain consent and consultation rights with respect to certain matters relating to the mortgage loans (other than any applicable excluded loans and, with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan and any servicing shift mortgage loan, will have certain limited consultation rights) and the right to replace the special servicer (other than with respect to a non-serviced mortgage loan and a servicing shift mortgage loan) with or without cause, except that if a control termination event (i.e., an event in which the certificate balance of the most senior class of certificates that is eligible to be a controlling class, as reduced by the application of appraisal reduction amounts and realized losses, is less than 25% of its initial certificate balance) occurs and is continuing (other than with respect to a servicing shift mortgage loan, with respect to which the holder of the related controlling companion loan prior to the applicable servicing shift securitization date will have the rights and powers of the directing certificateholder under the pooling and servicing agreement), the directing certificateholder will lose the consent rights and the right to replace the special servicer, and if a consultation termination event (i.e., an event in which the certificate balance of the most senior class of certificates that is eligible to be a controlling class (as reduced by the application of realized losses) is less than 25% of its initial certificate balance) occurs and is continuing, then the directing certificateholder will no longer have any consultation rights with respect to any mortgage loans. The holder of the controlling companion loan for the related servicing shift whole loan will, prior to the related servicing shift securitization date, be entitled to replace the
144
related special servicer with or without cause (solely as to such servicing shift whole loan), regardless of whether a control termination event exists. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder”.
These actions and decisions with respect to which the directing certificateholder has consent or consultation rights include, among others, certain modifications to the mortgage loans or any serviced whole loan (other than a servicing shift whole loan), including modifications of monetary terms, foreclosure or comparable conversion of the related mortgaged properties, and certain sales of mortgage loans or REO properties for less than the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest, fees and expenses. As a result of the exercise of these rights by the directing certificateholder, the special servicer may take actions with respect to a mortgage loan that could adversely affect the interests of investors in one or more classes of offered certificates.
Similarly, with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, the master servicer or the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan may, at the direction or upon the advice of the directing certificateholder (or equivalent) of the related securitization trust holding the controlling note for a non-serviced whole loan, take actions with respect to such non-serviced mortgage loan and related companion loans that could adversely affect such non-serviced mortgage loan, and therefore, the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. Similarly, with respect to any servicing shift whole loan, prior to the related servicing shift securitization date, the special servicer or the master servicer may, at the direction or upon the advice of the holder of the related controlling companion loan, take actions with respect to such whole loan that could adversely affect such whole loan, and therefore, the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. The issuing entity (as the holder of a non-controlling note) will have limited consultation rights with respect to major decisions and the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to a non-serviced whole loan (and the servicing shift whole loans) and in connection with a sale of a defaulted loan, and such rights will be exercised by the directing certificateholder for this transaction so long as no consultation termination event has occurred and is continuing and by the operating advisor if a consultation termination event has occurred and is continuing. Additionally, with respect to each non-serviced whole loan, in circumstances similar to those described above, the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) of the related securitization trust will have the right to replace the special servicer of such securitization with or without cause, and without the consent of the issuing entity. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Although the master servicer and the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement and the master servicer and the special servicer for a non-serviced mortgage loan are not permitted to take actions which are prohibited by law or violate the servicing standard under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement or the terms of the related mortgage loan documents, it is possible that the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement may direct or advise, as applicable, the special servicer to take actions with respect to such mortgage loan that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates.
You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that the directing certificateholder, the controlling companion loan holder with respect to any
145
servicing shift whole loan and the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan:
(i) may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates;
(ii) may act solely in the interests of the holders of the controlling class (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the controlling class of the securitization trust formed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan) or, in the case of any servicing shift mortgage loan, the related controlling companion loan holder may act solely in its own best interests;
(iii) does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates other than the controlling class (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the controlling class of the securitization trust formed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan) or, in the case of any servicing shift mortgage loan, the related controlling companion loan holder does not have any duties to any other person;
(iv) may take actions that favor the interests of the holders of the controlling class (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the controlling class of the securitization trust formed under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan) over the interests of the holders of one or more other classes of certificates, or in the case of any servicing shift mortgage loan, the related controlling companion loan holder may take actions that favor only its own interests; and
(v) will have no liability whatsoever (other than to a controlling class certificateholder) for having so acted as set forth in clauses (i) – (iv) above, and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the directing certificateholder or the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of a non-serviced mortgage loan, or the controlling companion loan holder of any servicing shift whole loan, or any of their respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, shareholders, members, partners, agents or principals for having so acted.
In addition, if the certificate balances of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates in the aggregate (taking into account the application of any cumulative appraisal reduction amounts to notionally reduce the certificate balances of such classes) is 25% or less of the initial certificate balances of such classes in the aggregate, (such event being referred to in this prospectus as an “operating advisor consultation event”), then so long as an operating advisor consultation event has occurred and is continuing, the operating advisor will have certain consultation rights with respect to certain matters relating to the mortgage loans (other than any non-serviced mortgage loan or servicing shift mortgage loan). Further, the operating advisor will have the right to recommend a replacement of the special servicer at any time, as and to the extent described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor” and “—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote”. The operating advisor is generally required to act on behalf of the issuing entity and in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the certificateholders and, with respect to any serviced whole loan (other than a servicing shift whole loan), for the benefit of any holder of a related companion loan (as a collective whole as if the certificateholders and the companion loan holder constituted a single lender). We cannot
146
assure you that any actions taken by the master servicer or the special servicer as a result of a recommendation or consultation by the operating advisor will not adversely affect the interests of investors in one or more classes of certificates. With respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, the operating advisor, if any, appointed under the related pooling and servicing agreement governing the servicing of such non-serviced mortgage loan will have similar rights and duties under such pooling and servicing agreement. Further, the operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights under the pooling and servicing agreement for this transaction with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan, servicing shift mortgage loan or any related REO Property. Additionally, with respect to a servicing shift mortgage loan, in the event that the related controlling pari passu companion loan is not included in a future securitization, the pooling and servicing agreement under this securitization does not provide for an operating advisor with rights and duties in connection with the servicing and administration of such serviced whole loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
You Have Limited Rights to Replace the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor or the Asset Representations Reviewer
In general, the directing certificateholder will have the right to terminate and replace the special servicer with or without cause so long as no control termination event has occurred and is continuing and other than in respect of any applicable excluded loans or any servicing shift whole loan as described in this prospectus. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a control termination event under the pooling and servicing agreement, the special servicer (other than with respect to a servicing shift whole loan) may also be removed in certain circumstances (x) if a request is made by certificateholders evidencing not less than 25% of the voting rights (taking into account the application of appraisal reductions to notionally reduce the respective certificate balances) and (y) upon receipt of approval by certificateholders holding at least 66-2/3% of a quorum of the certificateholders (which quorum consists of the holders of certificates evidencing at least 50% of the aggregate voting rights (taking into account the application of realized losses and the application of appraisal reductions to notionally reduce the respective certificate balances)). See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause”.
The certificateholders will generally have no right to replace and terminate the master servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator without cause. The vote of the requisite percentage of certificateholders may terminate the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer without cause. The vote of the requisite percentage of the certificateholders will be required to replace the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer even for cause, and certain termination events may be waived by the vote of the requisite percentage of the certificateholders. With respect to each non-serviced whole loan, in circumstances similar to those described above, the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) and the certificateholders of the securitization trust related to such other pooling and servicing agreement will have the right to replace the special servicer of such securitization with or without cause, and without the consent of the issuing entity. The certificateholders in this transaction generally will have no right to replace the master servicer or the special servicer of a pooling and servicing agreement relating to any non-serviced mortgage loan, though under certain circumstances the certificateholders may have a limited right to replace the master servicer or special servicer for cause solely with respect to such non-serviced whole loan under such pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB
147
Whole Loans”. We cannot assure that your lack of control over the replacement of these parties will not have an adverse impact on your investment.
The Rights of Companion Holders and Mezzanine Debt May Adversely Affect Your Investment
The holders of a serviced pari passu companion loan relating to a serviced pari passu mortgage loan (including, in the case of a servicing shift mortgage loan, the holder of any related non-controlling serviced pari passu companion loan) will have certain consultation rights (on a non-binding basis) with respect to major decisions and implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to the related whole loan under the related intercreditor agreement. Such companion loan holder and its representative may have interests in conflict with those of the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, and may advise the special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates. Although any such consultation is non-binding and the special servicer may not be required to consult with the companion loan holder unless required to do so under the servicing standard, we cannot assure you that the exercise of the rights of such companion loan holder will not delay any action to be taken by the special servicer and will not adversely affect your investment.
With respect to any mortgage loan with one or more related subordinate companion loans, the holders of such companion loan(s) will have the right under certain limited circumstances to (i) cure certain defaults with respect to the related mortgage loan and to purchase (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium) the related mortgage loan and (ii) prior to the occurrence and continuance of a “control appraisal period” or a “control termination event” with respect to such subordinate companion loan, approve certain modifications and consent to certain actions to be taken with respect to the related whole loan and replace the special servicer with respect to the related whole loan. The rights of the holder of such subordinate companion loan could adversely affect your ability to protect your interests with respect to matters relating to the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
With respect to mortgage loans that have mezzanine debt or permit mezzanine debt in the future, the related mezzanine lender generally will have the right under certain limited circumstances to (i) cure certain defaults with respect to, and under certain default scenarios, purchase (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium) the related mortgage loan and (ii) so long as no event of default with respect to the related mortgage loan continues after the mezzanine lender’s cure right has expired, approve certain modifications and consent to certain actions to be taken with respect to the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics” and “—Additional Indebtedness”.
The purchase option that the holder of mezzanine debt holds pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement generally permits such holder to purchase its related defaulted mortgage loan for a purchase price generally equal to the outstanding principal balance of the related defaulted mortgage loan, together with accrued and unpaid interest (exclusive of default interest) on, and unpaid servicing expenses, protective advances and interest on advances related to, such defaulted mortgage loan. However, in the event such holder is not obligated to pay some or all of those fees and additional expenses, including any liquidation fee payable to the special servicer under the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, then the exercise of such holder’s rights under the intercreditor agreement to purchase the related mortgage loan from the issuing entity may result in a loss to the issuing entity in the amount of those fees and additional expenses. In addition, such
148
holder’s right to cure defaults under the related defaulted mortgage loan could delay the issuing entity’s ability to realize on or otherwise take action with respect to such defaulted mortgage loan.
In addition, with respect to any non-serviced mortgage loan or servicing shift mortgage loan, you will generally not have any right to vote or consent with respect to any matters relating to the servicing and administration of such non-serviced mortgage loan or servicing shift mortgage loan, however, the directing certificateholder (or equivalent) of the related securitization trust holding the controlling note for the related non-serviced whole loan (or the holder of the related controlling companion loan in the case of a servicing shift whole loan), will have the right to vote or consent with respect to certain specified matters relating to the servicing and administration of such non-serviced mortgage loan or servicing shift mortgage loan, as applicable. The interests of the securitization trust holding the controlling note (or the holder of the related controlling companion loan in the case of a servicing shift whole loan) may conflict with those of the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, and accordingly the directing certificateholder (or the equivalent) of such securitization trust (or the holder of the related controlling companion loan in the case of a servicing shift whole loan) may direct or advise the special servicer for the related securitization trust (or with respect to a servicing shift whole loan prior to the related servicing shift securitization date, the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization) to take actions that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that any companion loan holder:
● | may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates; |
● | may act solely in its own interests, without regard to your interests; |
● | do not have any duties to any other person, including the holders of any class of certificates; |
● | may take actions that favor its interests over the interests of the holders of one or more classes of certificates; and |
● | will have no liability whatsoever for having so acted and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the companion loan holder or its representative or any director, officer, employee, agent or principal of the companion loan holder or its representative for having so acted. |
Risks Relating to Modifications of the Mortgage Loans
As delinquencies or defaults occur, the special servicer will be required to utilize an increasing amount of resources to work with borrowers to maximize collections on the mortgage loans serviced by it. This may include modifying the terms of such mortgage loans that are in default or whose default is reasonably foreseeable. At each step in the process of trying to bring a defaulted mortgage loan current or in maximizing proceeds to the issuing entity, the special servicer will be required to invest time and resources not otherwise required when collecting payments on performing mortgage loans. Modifications
149
of mortgage loans implemented by the special servicer in order to maximize ultimate proceeds of such mortgage loans to the issuing entity may have the effect of, among other things, reducing or otherwise changing the mortgage rate, forgiving or forbearing payments of principal, interest or other amounts owed under the mortgage loan, extending the final maturity date of the mortgage loan, capitalizing or deferring delinquent interest and other amounts owed under the mortgage loan, forbearing payment of a portion of the principal balance of the mortgage loan or any combination of these or other modifications.
Any modified mortgage loan may remain in the issuing entity, and the modification may result in a reduction in (or may eliminate) the funds received in respect of such mortgage loan. In particular, any modification to reduce or forgive the amount of interest payable on the mortgage loan will reduce the amount of cash flow available to make distributions of interest on the certificates, which will likely impact the most subordinated classes of certificates that suffer the shortfall. To the extent the modification defers principal payments on the mortgage loan (including as a result of an extension of its stated maturity date), certificates entitled to principal distributions will likely be repaid more slowly than anticipated, and if principal payments on the mortgage loan are forgiven, the reduction will cause a write-down of the certificate balances of the certificates in reverse order of seniority. See “Description of the Certificates—Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses”.
The ability to modify mortgage loans by the special servicer may be limited by several factors. First, if the special servicer has to consider a large number of modifications, operational constraints may affect the ability of the special servicer to adequately address all of the needs of the borrowers. Furthermore, the terms of the related servicing agreement may prohibit the special servicer from taking certain actions in connection with a loan modification, such as an extension of the loan term beyond a specified date such as a specified number of years prior to the rated final distribution date. You should consider the importance of the role of the special servicer in maximizing collections for the transaction and the impediments the special servicer may encounter when servicing delinquent or defaulted mortgage loans. In some cases, failure by the special servicer to timely modify the terms of a defaulted mortgage loan may reduce amounts available for distribution on the certificates in respect of such mortgage loan, and consequently may reduce amounts available for distribution to the related certificates. In addition, even if a loan modification is successfully completed, we cannot assure you that the related borrower will continue to perform under the terms of the modified mortgage loan.
Modifications that are designed to maximize collections in the aggregate may adversely affect a particular class of certificates. The pooling and servicing agreement obligates the special servicer not to consider the interests of individual classes of certificates. You should note that in connection with considering a modification or other type of loss mitigation, the special servicer may incur or bear related out-of-pocket expenses, such as appraisal fees, which would be reimbursed to the special servicer from the transaction as servicing advances and paid from amounts received on the modified loan or from other mortgage loans in the mortgage pool but in each case, prior to distributions being made on the certificates.
Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan
Each sponsor is the sole warranting party in respect of the mortgage loans sold by such sponsor to us. Neither we nor any of our affiliates (other than UBS AG, New York Branch, a sponsor, in respect of the mortgage loans it will contribute to this securitization) is obligated
150
to repurchase or substitute any mortgage loan or make any payment to compensate the issuing entity in connection with a breach of any representation or warranty of a sponsor or any document defect, if the sponsor defaults on its obligation to do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to the related mortgage loan purchase agreement, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP will agree to guarantee the payment obligation of Ladder Capital Finance LLC in connection with any such repurchase by Ladder Capital Finance LLC. We cannot assure you that the sponsors, notwithstanding the existence of any payment guarantee, will effect such repurchases or substitutions or make such payment to compensate the issuing entity. Although a loss of value payment may only be made by the related mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of mortgage loans sold by Ladder Capital Finance LLC, that mortgage loan seller, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and/or Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP) to the extent that the special servicer deems such amount to be sufficient to compensate the issuing entity for such material defect or material breach, we cannot assure you that such loss of value payment will fully compensate the issuing entity for such material defect or material breach in all respects. In particular, in the case of a non-serviced whole loan that is serviced under the related non-serviced pooling and servicing agreement entered into in connection with the securitization of the related pari passu companion loan, the asset representations reviewer under that pooling and servicing agreement, if any, may review the diligence file relating to such pari passu companion loan concurrently with the review of the asset representations reviewer of the related mortgage loan for this transaction, and their findings may be inconsistent, and such inconsistency may allow the related mortgage loan seller to challenge the findings of the asset representations reviewer of the affected mortgage loan. In addition, the sponsors may have various legal defenses available to them in connection with a repurchase or substitution obligation or an obligation to pay the loss of value payment. Any mortgage loan that is not repurchased or substituted and that is not a “qualified mortgage” for a REMIC may cause designated portions of the issuing entity to fail to qualify as a REMIC or cause the issuing entity to incur a tax.
Each sponsor (or, in the case of mortgage loans sold by Ladder Capital Finance LLC, each of that mortgage loan seller, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP) has only limited assets with which to fulfill any obligations on its part that may arise as a result of a material document defect or a material breach of any of the sponsor’s representations or warranties. We cannot assure you that a sponsor or any related payment guarantor has or will have sufficient assets with which to fulfill any obligations on its part that may arise, or that any such entity will maintain its existence.
Additionally, two of the sponsors, Société Générale and Barclays Bank PLC, may be subject to the “bail-in” powers of a Resolution Authority and such sponsor’s liabilities, including the obligation to repurchase certain defective mortgage loans could, among other things, be reduced, converted or extinguished in full. Alternatively the BRRD gives the power to a Resolution Authority to transfer the assets of certain relevant institutions to a third party entity. See “—The Sponsors, the Depositor and the Issuing Entity Are Subject to Bankruptcy or Insolvency Laws That May Affect the Issuing Entity’s Ownership of the Mortgage Loans”.
See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
Risks Relating to Interest on Advances and Special Servicing Compensation
To the extent described in this prospectus, the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will each be entitled to receive interest on unreimbursed advances made by it at
151
the “prime rate” as published in The Wall Street Journal. This interest will generally accrue from the date on which the related advance is made or the related expense is incurred to the date of reimbursement. In addition, under certain circumstances, including delinquencies in the payment of principal and/or interest, a mortgage loan will be specially serviced and the special servicer will be entitled to compensation for special servicing activities. The right to receive interest on advances or special servicing compensation is senior to the rights of certificateholders to receive distributions on the offered certificates. The payment of interest on advances and the payment of compensation to the special servicer may lead to shortfalls in amounts otherwise distributable on your certificates.
Bankruptcy of a Servicer May Adversely Affect Collections on the Mortgage Loans and the Ability to Replace the Servicer
The master servicer or the special servicer may be eligible to become a debtor under the federal bankruptcy code or enter into receivership under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”). If the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, were to become a debtor under the federal bankruptcy code or enter into receivership under the FDIA, although the pooling and servicing agreement provides that such an event would entitle the issuing entity to terminate the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, the provision would most likely not be enforceable. However, a rejection of the pooling and servicing agreement by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in a bankruptcy proceeding or repudiation of the pooling and servicing agreement in a receivership under the FDIA would be treated as a breach of the pooling and servicing agreement and give the issuing entity a claim for damages and the ability to appoint a successor master servicer or special servicer, as applicable. An assumption under the federal bankruptcy code would require the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, to cure its pre-bankruptcy defaults, if any, and demonstrate that it is able to perform following assumption. The bankruptcy court may permit the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, to assume the servicing agreement and assign it to a third party. An insolvency by an entity governed by state insolvency law would vary depending on the laws of the particular state. We cannot assure you that a bankruptcy or receivership of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, would not adversely impact the servicing of the related mortgage loans or the issuing entity would be entitled to terminate the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in a timely manner or at all.
If the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, becomes the subject of bankruptcy or similar proceedings, the issuing entity claim to collections in that master servicer or special servicer’s, as applicable, possession at the time of the bankruptcy filing or other similar filing may not be perfected. In this event, funds available to pay principal and interest on your certificates may be delayed or reduced.
The Sponsors, the Depositor and the Issuing Entity Are Subject to Bankruptcy or Insolvency Laws That May Affect the Issuing Entity’s Ownership of the Mortgage Loans
In the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of a sponsor or the depositor, it is possible the issuing entity’s right to payment from or ownership of the mortgage loans could be challenged, and if such challenge were successful, delays, reductions in payments and/or losses on the certificates could occur.
The transfer of the mortgage loans by the sponsors in connection with this offering is not expected to qualify for the securitization safe harbor adopted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) for securitizations sponsored by insured depository institutions. However, the safe harbor is non-exclusive.
152
In the case of each sponsor, an opinion of counsel will be rendered on the closing date, based on certain facts and assumptions and subject to certain qualifications, to the effect that the transfer of the related mortgage loans by such sponsor to the depositor would generally be respected in the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency of such sponsor. A legal opinion is not a guaranty as to what any particular court would actually decide, but rather an opinion as to the decision a court would reach if the issues are competently presented and the court followed existing precedent as to legal and equitable principles applicable in bankruptcy cases. In any event, we cannot assure you that the FDIC, a bankruptcy trustee or another interested party, as applicable, would not attempt to assert that such transfer was not a sale. Even if a challenge were not successful, it is possible that payments on the certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.
In addition, since the issuing entity is a common law trust, it may not be eligible for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws, unless it can be characterized as a “business trust” for purposes of the federal bankruptcy laws. Bankruptcy courts look at various considerations in making this determination, so it is not possible to predict with any certainty whether or not the issuing entity would be characterized as a “business trust”. Regardless of whether a bankruptcy court ultimately determines that the issuing entity is a “business trust”, it is possible that payments on the offered certificates would be delayed while the court resolved the issue.
Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act provides for an orderly liquidation authority (“OLA”) under which the FDIC can be appointed as receiver of certain systemically important non-bank financial companies and their direct or indirect subsidiaries in certain cases. We make no representation as to whether this would apply to any of the sponsors. In January 2011, the then-acting general counsel of the FDIC issued a letter (the “Acting General Counsel’s Letter”) in which he expressed his view that, under then-existing regulations, the FDIC, as receiver under the OLA, would not, in the exercise of its OLA repudiation powers, recover as property of a financial company assets transferred by the financial company, provided that the transfer satisfies the conditions for the exclusion of assets from the financial company’s estate under the federal bankruptcy code. The letter further noted that, while the FDIC staff may be considering recommending further regulations under OLA, the acting general counsel would recommend that such regulations incorporate a 90-day transition period for any provisions affecting the FDIC’s statutory power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts. If, however, the FDIC were to adopt a different approach than that described in the Acting General Counsel’s Letter, delays or reductions in payments on the offered certificates would occur.
Société Générale, a sponsor, a mortgage loan seller and an originator, is a French limited liability company (“société anonyme”) authorized as a bank and is subject to the provisions of French insolvency laws. Pursuant to French insolvency laws, certain transactions entered into by a French registered company may be subsequently challenged if entered into during the “hardening period” (“periode suspecte”). In the event the challenge was successful, the transfer of mortgage loans by Société Générale may be declared null and void by the insolvency judge. The hardening period is the period between the date on which the company became insolvent and the date of the order of the court commencing an insolvency proceeding. The date of insolvency (“état decessation des paiements”) is deemed to be the date of the court order commencing the proceeding, unless the court sets an earlier date which may be no earlier than 18 months before the date of such court order. In the event a French insolvency proceeding is open against Société Générale and if the transfer of mortgage loans occurred during such 18-month period before the opening of the proceeding, it is possible that a court appointed officer, the court or the public prosecutor would try to claim that Société Générale was already insolvent at the time of the transfer and try to challenge the validity of such transfer under French insolvency
153
rules. Even if a challenge were not successful, resolution of such a matter could cause significant delay which may impact on payments under the certificates. In addition, Société Générale’s obligation to repurchase mortgage loans or to cure certain breaches or defects with respect to mortgage loans could be subject to the “bail-in” powers of a Resolution Authority and such sponsor’s liabilities, including the obligation to repurchase certain defective mortgage loans could, among other things, be reduced, converted or extinguished in full. Alternatively, the BRRD gives the power to a Resolution Authority to transfer the assets of certain relevant institutions to a third party entity. See “—Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates”.
If Société Générale were acting through its New York branch, and were to become the subject of an insolvency proceeding under the laws of France and a proceeding were initiated under Chapter 15 of the federal bankruptcy code or the New York Superintendent of Financial Services were to take possession of the New York branch, it is possible that the New York Superintendent of Financial Services, a creditor or trustee in bankruptcy of Société Générale may argue that the sale of its interest in the mortgage loans by Société Générale was a pledge of the receivables rather than a sale. The New York Superintendent of Financial Services, a creditor, a bankruptcy trustee or another interested party could still attempt to assert that the transfer of Société Générale’s interest in the mortgage loans was not a sale. If such party’s challenge is successful, payments on the certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge is not successful, payments on the certificates could be delayed while a court resolves the claim.
Barclays Bank PLC, a mortgage loan seller, a sponsor and an originator, is subject to the provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986, as amended (United Kingdom Act of Parliament, 1986 ch. 45) (the “Insolvency Act”) and the Banking Act 2009, as amended (United Kingdom Act of Parliament, 2009 ch. 1) (the “Banking Act”). Under the terms of the Insolvency Act, certain transactions by an English-registered company, such as Barclays, may be challenged by an insolvency officer appointed to that company on its insolvency. Under the Banking Act, the Secretary of State, Prudential Regulation Authority, or Bank of England can apply to the court for implementation of an insolvency regime specifically for certain deposit-taking institutions. One aspect of this regime is that an insolvency officer will conduct the relevant insolvency process in such a manner as to promote protection of retail deposits held by such an institution (in combination with the United Kingdom Financial Services Compensation Scheme).
Further, under the Banking Act, specified UK authorities have extended tools to deal with the failure (or likely failure) of certain UK incorporated entities, including authorized and established entities including deposit-taking institutions and investment firms and powers to recognize and give effect to certain resolution actions in respect of the European Economic Area and third country institutions. The tools available under the Banking Act may be used in respect of relevant institutions and, in certain circumstances, their UK established banking group companies and such tools include (a) the power to issue share transfer instruments and/or orders pursuant to which there may be transferred to a commercial purchaser or a nominee of or a company wholly owned by the UK Treasury, all or some of the securities issued by a UK institution with permission to accept deposits under the FSMA (“UK Bank”) (or any UK holding company of the UK Bank). The share transfers can extend to a wide range of “securities” including shares and bonds issued by the UK Bank (or any UK holding company of the UK Bank) and warrants for such and also deferred shares or private membership rights in a building society and (b) the power to transfer all or some of the property, rights and liabilities of a UK Bank or a building society to a commercial purchaser or Bank of England entity. In certain circumstances encumbrances and trusts can be over-reached or varied. Power also exists to override any default
154
provisions in transactions otherwise affected by these powers. Compensation may be payable in the context of share transfer instruments and/or orders and property transfer instruments. In the case of share transfers any compensation will be paid to the person who held the security immediately before the transfer, who may not be the encumbrancer. The Banking Act also includes provisions relating to two new insolvency procedures which may be commenced by specified UK authorities (bank insolvency and bank administration).
The Banking Act also vests power in the Bank of England (among other things) to override, vary or impose contractual obligations between the UK Bank (or any UK holding company of the UK Bank) and its former group undertakings (as defined in the Banking Act), for reasonable consideration, in order to enable any transferee or successor bank of the UK Bank (or any UK holding company of the UK Bank) to operate effectively. There is also power for the UK Treasury to amend the law (save for a provision made by or under the Act) by order for the purpose of enabling it to use the special resolution regime powers effectively, potentially with retrospective effect.
If an instrument or order were to be made under the Bank Act in respect of Barclays Bank PLC, such instrument or order may (among other things) affect the ability of Barclays Bank PLC to satisfy its obligations under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and/or result in modifications to the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement. As a result, the making of an instrument or order in respect of Barclays Bank PLC may affect the ability of the issuing entity to meet its obligations in respect of the certificates. While there is provision for compensation in certain circumstances under the Banking Act, there can be no assurance that certificateholders would recover compensation promptly and equal to any loss actually incurred.
As at the date of this prospectus, no order or action has been taken by the UK Treasury or the Bank of England under the Banking Act in respect of Barclays Bank PLC and there has been no indication that any such instrument or order will be made, but there can be no assurance that this will not change and/or that certificateholders will not be adversely affected by any such instrument or order if made.
An opinion of counsel will be rendered on the closing date, based on certain facts and assumptions and subject to certain qualifications, to the effect that the transfer of Barclays’ interest in the mortgage loan by Barclays Bank PLC will constitute a true sale of such assets. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that an interested party would not attempt to assert that such transfer was not a sale nor challenge the transaction under United Kingdom insolvency rules, nor that the transfer could not be affected by an order under the Banking Act. Even if a challenge were not successful, or if an order under the Banking Act itself was successfully challenged, resolution of such a matter could cause significant delay which may impact on payments under the certificates.
The BRRD equips national authorities in EU member states (the “Resolution Authorities”) with tools and powers for preparatory and preventive measures, early supervisory intervention and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms (collectively, “Relevant Institutions”). If a Relevant Institution enters into a mortgage loan purchase agreement with the depositor and is deemed likely to fail within the circumstances identified in the BRRD, the relevant Resolution Authority may employ such tools and powers in order to intervene in the Relevant Institution’s failure. In particular, liabilities of Relevant Institutions arising out of the mortgage loan purchase agreement (for example, liabilities requiring lenders to repurchase mortgage loans or to cure certain breaches or defects with respect to mortgage loans) and not otherwise subject to an exception, could be subject to the exercise of “bail-in” powers of the relevant Resolution Authorities (which power is just one of a number of wide powers given to Resolution Authorities for the recovery and
155
resolution of banks and other financial institutions). If the relevant Resolution Authority decides to apply the “bail-in” tool to the liabilities of a Relevant Institution, then subject to certain exceptions set out in the BRRD, the liabilities of such Relevant Institution could, among other things, be reduced, converted to shares or other ownership interests in the Relevant Institution, its parent company or a bridge institution or extinguished in full. In addition, under the BRRD the Resolution Authority will have the power (among other tools) to transfer to a third party, rights, assets or liabilities of an institution under resolution. As a result, the depositor or the issuing entity and ultimately, the certificateholders may not be able to recover any liabilities owed by such an entity to the depositor or the issuing entity, as applicable. Further, a relevant Resolution Authority may exercise its discretions in a manner that produces different outcomes amongst institutions resolved in different EU member states. The resolution mechanisms under the BRRD correspond closely to those available to the Single Resolution Board (the “SRB”) and the European Commission under the SR Regulation (Regulation 806/2014) which applies to EU member states in the Eurozone and other member states participating in the single supervisory mechanism (the “SSM”) with the SRB taking on many of the functions assigned to national resolution authorities by the BRRD. If a member state (such as the UK) has chosen not to participate in the SSM, Relevant Institutions established in that member state are not subject to the SR Regulation, but to the BRRD as implemented in that member state. For a discussion of certain risks relating to repurchases of a mortgage loan, see “—Sponsors May Not Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans or Pay Any Loss of Value Payment Sufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan” above.
If Barclays Bank PLC were acting through its New York branch, and were to become the subject of an insolvency proceeding under the laws of the United Kingdom and a proceeding were initiated under Chapter 15 of the federal bankruptcy code or the New York Superintendent of Financial Services were to take possession of the New York branch, it is possible that the New York Superintendent of Financial Services, a creditor or trustee in bankruptcy of Barclays Bank PLC may argue that the sale of its interest in the mortgage loan by Barclays Bank PLC was a pledge of the receivables rather than a sale. The New York Superintendent of Financial Services, a creditor, a bankruptcy trustee or another interested party could still attempt to assert that the transfer of Barclays’ interest in the mortgage loans was not a sale. If such party’s challenge is successful, payments on the certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge is not successful, payments on the certificates could be delayed while a court resolves the claim.
The Requirement of the Special Servicer to Obtain FIRREA-Compliant Appraisals May Result in an Increased Cost to the Issuing Entity
Each appraisal obtained pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement is required to contain a statement, or is accompanied by a letter from the appraiser, to the effect that the appraisal was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), as in effect on the date such appraisal was obtained. Any such appraisal is likely to be more expensive than an appraisal that is not FIRREA compliant. Such increased cost could result in losses to the issuing entity. Additionally, FIRREA compliant appraisals are required to assume a value determined by a typically motivated buyer and seller, and could result in a higher appraised value than one prepared assuming a forced liquidation or other distress situation. In addition, because a FIRREA compliant appraisal may result in a higher valuation than a non-FIRREA compliant appraisal, there may be a delay in calculating and applying appraisal reductions, which could result in the holders of a given class of certificates continuing to hold the full non-notionally reduced amount of such certificates for a longer period of time than would be the case if a non-FIRREA compliant appraisal were obtained.
156
Tax Matters and Changes in Tax Law May Adversely Impact the Mortgage Loans or Your Investment
Tax Considerations Relating to Foreclosure
If the issuing entity acquires a mortgaged property (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property) subsequent to a default on the related mortgage loan pursuant to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, the special servicer (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the related non-serviced special servicer) would be required to retain an independent contractor to operate and manage such mortgaged property. Among other restrictions, the independent contractor generally will not be able to perform construction work other than repair, maintenance or certain types of tenant build-outs, unless the construction was more than 10% completed when the mortgage loan defaulted or when the default of the mortgage loan became imminent. Generally, any (i) net income from such operation (other than qualifying “rents from real property”) (ii) rental income based on the net profits of a tenant or sub-tenant or allocable to a service that is non-customary in the area and for the type of property involved and (iii) rental income attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property, if the rent attributable to the personal property exceeds 15% of the total rent for the taxable year, will subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to federal tax (and possibly state or local tax) on such income at the corporate tax rate (which, as of January 1, 2018, is 21%). No determination has been made whether any portion of the income from the mortgaged properties constitutes “rent from real property”. Any such imposition of tax will reduce the net proceeds available for distribution to certificateholders. The special servicer (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, the related non-serviced special servicer) may permit the Lower-Tier REMIC to earn “net income from foreclosure property” that is subject to tax if it determines that the net after-tax benefit to holders of certificates and any related companion loan holders, as a collective whole, could reasonably be expected to be greater than under another method of operating or leasing the mortgaged property. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans”. In addition, if the issuing entity were to acquire one or more mortgaged properties (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property) pursuant to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, upon acquisition of those mortgaged properties (or, in the case of a non-serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property), the issuing entity may in certain jurisdictions, particularly in New York, be required to pay state or local transfer or excise taxes upon liquidation of such properties. Such state or local taxes may reduce net proceeds available for distribution to the certificateholders.
When foreclosing on a real estate mortgage, a REMIC is generally limited to taking only the collateral that will qualify as “foreclosure property” within the meaning of the REMIC provisions. Foreclosure property includes only the real property (ordinarily the land and structures) securing the real estate mortgage and personal property incident to such real property.
REMIC Status
If an entity intended to qualify as a REMIC fails to satisfy one or more of the REMIC provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, during any taxable year, the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, provides that such entity will not be treated as a REMIC for such year and any year thereafter. In such event, the relevant entity would likely be treated as an association taxable as a corporation under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. If designated portions of the issuing entity are so treated, the offered certificates may be treated as stock interests in an association and not as debt instruments.
157
Material Federal Tax Considerations Regarding Original Issue Discount
One or more classes of offered certificates may be issued with “original issue discount” for federal income tax purposes, which generally would result in the holder recognizing taxable income in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to that income. Accordingly, investors must have sufficient sources of cash to pay any federal, state or local income taxes with respect to the original issue discount. In addition, such original issue discount will be required to be accrued and included in income based on the assumption that no defaults will occur and no losses will be incurred with respect to the mortgage loans. This could lead to the inclusion of amounts in ordinary income early in the term of the certificate that later prove uncollectible, giving rise to a bad debt deduction. In the alternative, an investor may be required to treat such uncollectible amount as a capital loss under Section 166 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Description of the Mortgage Pool
General
The assets of the issuing entity will consist of a pool of sixty-seven (67) fixed rate mortgage loans (the “Mortgage Loans” or, collectively, the “Mortgage Pool”) with an aggregate principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $1,045,167,892 (the “Initial Pool Balance”). The “Cut-off Date” means the respective due dates for such Mortgage Loans in February 2018 (or, in the case of any Mortgage Loan that has its first due date after February 2018, the date that would have been its due date in February 2018 under the terms of that Mortgage Loan if a monthly debt service payment were scheduled to be due in that month).
Eight (8) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 33.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, are each part of a larger whole loan, each of which is comprised of the related Mortgage Loan and one or more loans that are pari passu in right of payment to the related Mortgage Loan (collectively referred to in this prospectus as “Pari Passu Companion Loans”) and/or are subordinate in right of payment to the related Mortgage Loan (referred to in this prospectus as a “Subordinate Companion Loan”). The Pari Passu Companion Loans and the Subordinate Companion Loans are collectively referred to as the “Companion Loans”, and each Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loans are collectively referred to as a “Whole Loan”. Each Companion Loan is secured by the same mortgage and the same single assignment of leases and rents securing the related Mortgage Loan. See “—The Whole Loans” below for more information regarding the rights of the holders of any Companion Loan.
The Mortgage Loans were selected for this transaction from mortgage loans specifically originated for securitizations of this type by the mortgage loan sellers and their respective affiliates, or originated by others and acquired by the mortgage loan sellers specifically for a securitization of this type, in either case, taking into account, among other factors, rating agency criteria and anticipated feedback from investors in the most subordinate certificates, property type and geographic location.
158
The Mortgage Loans were originated, co-originated or acquired by the mortgage loan sellers set forth in the following chart and such entities will sell their respective Mortgage Loans to the depositor, which will in turn sell the Mortgage Loans to the issuing entity:
Sellers of the Mortgage Loans
Sponsor |
Originator |
Number of Mortgage Loans |
Number of Mortgaged Properties |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of Mortgage Loans |
Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | |||||
Ladder Capital Finance LLC | Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate | 18 | 31 | $240,914,103 | 23.1% | |||||
UBS AG, New York Branch | UBS AG, New York Branch(1)(2)(3) | 13 | 31 | 185,760,271 | 17.8 | |||||
Société Générale | Société Générale(1)(4)(5) | 6 | 11 | 180,386,589 | 17.3 | |||||
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. | Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.(2) | 6 | 7 | 134,620,128 | 12.9 | |||||
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC | Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC | 8 | 8 | 112,425,000 | 10.8 | |||||
CIBC Inc. | CIBC Inc. | 9 | 10 | 98,083,420 | 9.4 | |||||
Barclays Bank PLC |
Barclays Bank PLC | 7 | 28 | 92,978,380 |
8.9 | |||||
Total | 67 | 126 | $1,045,167,892 |
100.0% |
(1) | One (1) Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 5.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, is part of a whole loan that was co-originated by Société Générale and UBS AG, New York Branch. The Mortgage Loan is evidenced by four promissory notes, Note A-1 and Note A-5, with principal balances of $25,000,000 and $10,000,000, respectively, as of the cut-off date and representing in the aggregate approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, as to which Société Générale is acting as mortgage loan seller and Note A-10 and Note A-15 with principal balances of $20,000,000 and $5,000,000, respectively, as of the cut-off date and representing in the aggregate approximately 2.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, as to which UBS AG, New York Branch is acting as mortgage loan seller. The “Number of Mortgage Loans” and the “Number of Mortgaged Properties” shown in the table above for Société Générale do not include the notes for which Société Générale is acting as mortgage loan seller; however, the “Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of Mortgage Loans” and the “Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance” shown in the table above for Société Générale do include these notes. Such Mortgage Loan was underwritten pursuant to the Société Générale’s and UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines. |
(2) | One (1) Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, representing approximately 5.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, is part of a whole loan that was originated by Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. Certain notes evidencing the Whole Loan were subsequently acquired by UBS AG, New York Branch. The Mortgage Loan is evidenced by six promissory notes, Note A-1-2, Note A-1-3 and Note A-1-4 with principal balances of $12,986,254, $9,989,426 and $5,244,449, respectively, as of the Cut-off Date and representing in the aggregate approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, as to which Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. is acting as mortgage loan seller and Note A-2-2, Note A-2-3 and Note A-2-4, with principal balances of $12,986,254, $9,989,426 and $5,244,449, respectively, as of the Cut-off Date and representing in the aggregate approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, as to which UBS AG, New York Branch is acting as mortgage loan seller. The “Number of Mortgage Loans” and the “Number of Mortgaged Properties” shown in the table above for Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. do not include the notes for which Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. is acting as mortgage loan seller; however, the “Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of Mortgage Loans” and the “Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance” shown in the table above for Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. do include these notes. Such Mortgage Loan was underwritten pursuant to the Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. underwriting guidelines and subsequently reunderwritten pursuant to UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines. |
(3) | One (1) Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC and UBS AG, New York Branch. Such Mortgage Loan was underwritten pursuant to UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines. |
(4) | One (1) Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Houston Distribution Center, representing approximately 4.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, is part of a whole loan that was co-originated by Société Générale and Barclays Bank PLC. Such mortgage loan was underwritten pursuant to Société Générale’s underwriting guidelines. |
159
(5) | One (1) Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, is part of a Whole Loan that was co-originated by Société Générale and Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. Such Mortgage Loan was underwritten pursuant to Société Générale’s underwriting guidelines. |
Each Mortgage Loan is evidenced by one or more promissory notes or similar evidence of indebtedness (each a “Mortgage Note”) and, in each case, is secured by (or, in the case of an indemnity deed of trust, backed by a guaranty that is secured by) one or more mortgages, deeds of trust or other similar security instruments (each, a “Mortgage”) creating a first lien on a fee simple and/or leasehold interest in one or more commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community properties (each, a “Mortgaged Property”).
The Mortgage Loans are generally non-recourse loans. In the event of a borrower default on a non-recourse Mortgage Loan, recourse may be had only against the specific Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties and the other limited assets securing such Mortgage Loan, and not against the related borrower’s other assets. The Mortgage Loans are not insured or guaranteed by the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers or any other person or entity unrelated to the respective borrower. You should consider all of the Mortgage Loans to be non-recourse loans as to which recourse in the case of default will be limited to the specific property and other assets, if any, pledged to secure the related Mortgage Loan.
Certain Calculations and Definitions
This prospectus sets forth certain information with respect to the Mortgage Loans and the Mortgaged Properties. The sum in any column of the tables presented in Annex A-2 or Annex A-3 may not equal the indicated total due to rounding. The information in Annex A-1 with respect to the Mortgage Loans (or Whole Loans, if applicable) and the Mortgaged Properties is based upon the pool of the Mortgage Loans as it is expected to be constituted as of the close of business on February 27, 2018 (the “Closing Date”), assuming that (i) all scheduled principal and interest payments due on or before the Cut-off Date will be made and (ii) there will be no principal prepayments on or before the Closing Date. The statistics in Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3 were primarily derived from information provided to the depositor by each sponsor, which information may have been obtained from the borrowers.
From time to time, a particular Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan may be identified in this prospectus by name (for example, the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan or the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan); when that occurs, we are referring to the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as the case may be, secured by the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified by that name on Annex A-1. From time to time, a particular Companion Loan may be identified by name (for example, the AFIN Portfolio Companion Loan); when that occurs, we are referring to the (or, if applicable, an individual) Companion Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified by that name on Annex A-1. From time to time, a particular Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties may be identified in this prospectus by name (for example, the AFIN Portfolio Mortgaged Property); when that occurs, we are referring to the Mortgaged Property identified by that name on Annex A-1.
All percentages of the Mortgage Loans and Mortgaged Properties, or of any specified group of Mortgage Loans and Mortgaged Properties, referred to in this prospectus without further description are approximate percentages of the Initial Pool Balance by Cut-off Date Balances and/or the allocated loan amount allocated to such Mortgaged Properties as of the Cut-off Date.
160
All information presented in this prospectus with respect to each Mortgage Loan with one or more Pari Passu Companion Loans is calculated in a manner that reflects the aggregate indebtedness evidenced by that Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), unless otherwise indicated. All information presented in this prospectus with respect to the Mortgage Loans with a related Subordinate Companion Loan is calculated without regard to any such Subordinate Companion Loan, unless otherwise indicated.
Definitions
For purposes of this prospectus, including the information presented in the Annexes, the indicated terms have the following meanings:
“ADR” means, for any hotel property, average daily rate.
“Annual Debt Service” generally means, for any Mortgage Loan, 12 times the average of the principal and interest payments for the first 12 payment periods of the Mortgage Loan following the Cut-off Date, provided that:
● | in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for interest-only payments through maturity or the Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, such term means the aggregate interest payments scheduled to be due on the Due Date following the Cut-off Date and the 11 Due Dates thereafter for such Mortgage Loan; and |
● | in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for an initial interest-only period and provides for scheduled amortization payments after the expiration of such interest-only period prior to the maturity date or the Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, 12 times the monthly payment of principal and interest payable during the amortization period. |
Monthly debt service and the debt service coverage ratios are also calculated using the average of the principal and interest payments for the first 12 payment periods of the Mortgage Loan following the Cut-off Date, subject to the proviso to the prior sentence. In the case of any Whole Loan, Annual Debt Service is calculated with respect to the Mortgage Loan including any related Companion Loan(s) (other than any related Subordinate Companion Loan). Annual Debt Service is calculated with regard to the related Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity only, unless otherwise indicated.
“Appraised Value” means, for any Mortgaged Property, the appraiser’s adjusted value of such Mortgaged Property as determined by the most recent third party appraisal of the Mortgaged Property available to the related mortgage loan seller as set forth under “Appraised Value” on Annex A-1. The Appraised Value set forth on Annex A-1 is the “as-is” value unless otherwise specified in this prospectus, on Annex A-1 and/or the related footnotes. In certain cases, the appraisals state values other than “as-is” as well as the “as-is” value for the related Mortgaged Property that assume that certain events will occur with respect to the re-tenanting, construction, renovation or repairs at such Mortgaged Property. In most such cases, the related mortgage loan seller has taken reserves sufficient to complete such re-tenanting, construction, renovation or repairs. We make no representation that sufficient amounts have been reserved or that the appraised value would approximate either the value that would be determined in a current appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property or the amount that would be realized upon a sale. In the case of certain Mortgage Loans as described under “—Appraised Value”, the Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio and/or the Loan-to-Value Ratio at Maturity or ARD for such Mortgage Loans has been calculated based on an other than “as-is” Appraised Value of a related Mortgaged Property.
161
“Balloon Balance” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the principal amount that will be due at maturity (or, in the case of any ARD Loan, outstanding at the related Anticipated Repayment Date) for such Mortgage Loan, assuming no payment defaults or principal prepayments.
“Cash Flow Analysis” is, with respect to one or more of the Mortgaged Properties securing a Mortgage Loan among the 15 largest Mortgage Loans or groups of cross-collateralized Mortgage Loans, a summary presentation of certain adjusted historical financial information provided by the related borrower, and a calculation of the Underwritten Net Cash Flow expressed as (a) “Effective Gross Income” minus (b) “Total Operating Expenses” and underwritten replacement reserves and (if applicable) tenant improvements and leasing commissions. For this purpose:
● | “Effective Gross Income” means, with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the revenue derived from the use and operation of that property, less allowances for vacancies, concessions and credit losses. The “revenue” component of such calculation was generally determined on the basis of the information described with respect to the “revenue” component described under “Underwritten Net Cash Flow” below. In general, any non-recurring revenue items and non-property related revenue are eliminated from the calculation of Effective Gross Income. |
● | “Total Operating Expenses” means, with respect to any Mortgaged Property, all operating expenses associated with that property, including, but not limited to, utilities, administrative expenses, repairs and maintenance, management fees, advertising costs, insurance premiums, real estate taxes and (if applicable) ground rent. Such expenses were generally determined on the basis of the same information as the “expense” component described under “Underwritten Net Cash Flow” below. |
To the extent available, selected historical income, expenses and net income associated with the operation of the related Mortgaged Property securing each Mortgage Loan appear in each cash flow summary contained in Annex A-3. Such information is one of the sources (but not the only source) of information on which calculations of Underwritten Net Cash Flow are based. The historical information presented is derived from audited and/or unaudited financial statements provided by the borrowers. The historical information in the cash flow summaries reflects adjustments made by the mortgage loan seller to exclude certain items contained in the related financial statements that were not considered in calculating Underwritten Net Cash Flow and is presented in a different format from the financial statements to show a comparison to the Underwritten Net Cash Flow. In general, solely for purposes of the presentation of historical financial information, the amount set forth under the caption “gross income” consists of the “total revenues” set forth in the applicable financial statements (including (as and to the extent stated) rental revenues, tenant reimbursements and recovery income (and, in the case of hospitality properties and certain other property types, parking income, telephone income, food and beverage income, laundry income and other income), with adjustments to exclude amounts recognized on the financial statements under a straight-line method of recognizing rental income (including increases in minimum rents and rent abatements) from operating leases over their lives and items indicated as extraordinary or one-time revenue collections or considered nonrecurring in property operations. The amount set forth under the caption “expenses” in the historical financial information consists of the total expenses set forth in the applicable financial statements, with adjustments to exclude allocated parent company expenses, restructuring charges and charges associated with employee severance and termination benefits, interest expenses paid to company affiliates or unrelated third parties, charges for depreciation and
162
amortization and items indicated as extraordinary or one-time losses or considered nonrecurring in property operations.
The selected historical information presented in the cash flow summaries is derived from audited and/or unaudited financial statements furnished by the respective borrowers which have not been verified by the depositor, any underwriters, the mortgage loan sellers or any other person. Audits or other verification of such financial statements could result in changes thereto, which could in turn result in the historical net income presented herein being overstated or understated.
“Cut-off Date Balance” of any Mortgage Loan, will be the unpaid principal balance of that Mortgage Loan, as of the Cut-off Date for such Mortgage Loan, after application of all payments due on or before that date, whether or not received.
An “LTV Ratio” for any Mortgage Loan, as of any date of determination, is a fraction, expressed as a percentage, the numerator of which is the scheduled principal balance of the Mortgage Loan as of that date (assuming no defaults or prepayments on the Mortgage Loan prior to that date), and the denominator of which is the “as-is” (or, in the case of Mortgage Loans identified under “—Appraised Value” below, other than “as-is”) Appraised Value as determined by an appraisal of the Mortgaged Property obtained at or about the time of the origination of the related Mortgage Loan.
The LTV Ratio as of the related maturity date or, if applicable, the Anticipated Repayment Date, set forth in Annex A-2 was calculated based on the principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan on the related maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as the case may be, or assuming all principal payments required to be made on or prior to the related maturity date or, if applicable, the Anticipated Repayment Date (in either case, not including the Maturity Date Balloon or ARD Payment) are made. In addition, because it is based on the value of a Mortgaged Property determined as of loan origination, the information set forth in this prospectus in Annex A-1 and in Annex A-2 is not necessarily a reliable measure of the related borrower’s current equity in each Mortgaged Property. In a declining real estate market, the appraised value of a Mortgaged Property could have decreased from the appraised value determined at origination and the current actual LTV Ratio of a Mortgage Loan and the LTV Ratio at maturity or Anticipated Repayment Date may be higher than its LTV Ratio at origination even after taking into account amortization since origination. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”.
In the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan unless otherwise indicated, LTV Ratios were calculated with respect to such Mortgage Loan including any related Companion Loan(s) (except, in the case of a Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, LTV Ratios were calculated without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan.
The characteristics described above and in Annex A-2, along with certain additional characteristics of the Mortgage Loans presented on a loan-by-loan basis, are set forth in Annex A-1.
“Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” or “Cut-off Date LTV Ratio” generally means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the Cut-off Date Balance of a Mortgage Loan to the Appraised Value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties determined as described under “—Appraised Value”. See also the footnotes to Annex A-1. Because the Appraised Values of the Mortgaged Properties were determined prior to origination, the information set forth in this prospectus, including the Annexes hereto, is not necessarily a
163
reliable measure of property value or the related borrower’s current equity in each Mortgaged Property. In a declining real estate market, the appraised value of a Mortgaged Property may have decreased from the appraised value determined at origination and the current actual cut-off date loan-to-value ratio of a Mortgage Loan may be higher than the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio that we present in this prospectus, even after taking into account any amortization since origination. No representation is made that any Appraised Value presented in this prospectus would approximate either the value that would be determined in a current appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property or the amount that would be realized upon a sale of that property. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”. In the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated based on the aggregate principal balance of the Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) (but excluding any related Subordinate Companion Loan) as of the Cut-off Date.
“Debt Service Coverage Ratio”, “DSCR”, “Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio”, “U/W NCF DSCR” or “U/W DSCR” generally means the ratio of the Underwritten Net Cash Flow for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties to the Annual Debt Service as shown on Annex A-1.
In the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, such debt service coverage ratio was calculated based on the aggregate Annual Debt Service of the Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) (but excluding any related Subordinate Companion Loan).
In general, debt service coverage ratios are used by income property lenders to measure the ratio of (a) cash currently generated by a property or expected to be generated by a property based upon executed leases that is available for debt service to (b) required debt service payments. However, debt service coverage ratios only measure the current, or recent, ability of a property to service mortgage debt. If a property does not possess a stable operating expectancy (for instance, if it is subject to material leases that are scheduled to expire during the loan term and that provide for above-market rents and/or that may be difficult to replace), a debt service coverage ratio may not be a reliable indicator of a property’s ability to service the mortgage debt over the entire remaining loan term. See the definition of “Underwritten Net Cash Flow” below.
The Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratios presented in this prospectus appear for illustrative purposes only and, as discussed above, are limited in their usefulness in assessing the current, or predicting the future, ability of a Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties to generate sufficient cash flow to repay the related Mortgage Loan. No representation is made that the Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratios presented in this prospectus accurately reflect that ability.
“GLA” means gross leasable area.
“In-Place Cash Management” means, for funds directed into a lockbox, such funds are generally not made immediately available to the related borrower, but instead are forwarded to a cash management account controlled by the lender and the funds are disbursed according to the related Mortgage Loan documents with any excess remitted to the related borrower (unless an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents or one or more specified trigger events have occurred and are outstanding) generally on a daily basis.
164
“Loan Per Unit” means the principal balance per unit of measure (as applicable) as of the Cut-off Date. With respect to any Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan structure, the Loan Per Unit is calculated with regard to both the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) and the related Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity, but without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan, unless otherwise indicated.
“LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD”, “LTV Ratio at Maturity or Anticipated Repayment Date” and “Balloon LTV Ratio” generally means the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the principal balance of a balloon Mortgage Loan scheduled to be outstanding on the stated maturity date (or, in the case of an ARD Loan, scheduled to be outstanding on the Anticipated Repayment Date), assuming (among other things) no prepayments or defaults, to (b) the Appraised Value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties determined as described under “—Appraised Value”. Each Mortgage Loan requires that a regular monthly debt service payment be made on the stated maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, and accordingly the principal balance referenced in clause (a) of the immediately preceding sentence will be net of the principal portion, if any, of the monthly debt service payment due on such date. Because the Appraised Values of the Mortgaged Properties were determined prior to origination, the information set forth in this prospectus, including the Annexes hereto, is not necessarily a reliable measure of the related borrower’s current equity in each Mortgaged Property. In a declining real estate market, the appraised value of a Mortgaged Property may have decreased from the appraised value determined at origination and the actual loan-to-value ratio at maturity of a Mortgage Loan may be higher than the LTV Ratio at Maturity that we present in this prospectus. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”. In the case of each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, unless otherwise indicated, such loan-to-value ratio was calculated based on the aggregate principal balance that will be due at maturity (or, in the case of an ARD Loan, scheduled to be outstanding on the Anticipated Repayment Date) with respect to such Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s). In the case of a Mortgage Loan with one or more related Subordinate Companion Loans, LTV Ratios at Maturity or ARD were calculated without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan.
“Maturity Date Balloon or ARD Payment” or “Balloon or ARD Payment” means, for any balloon Mortgage Loan or ARD Loan, the payment of principal due upon its stated maturity date or, in the case of an ARD Loan, the principal balance scheduled to be outstanding at the related Anticipated Repayment Date. Each Mortgage Loan requires that a regular monthly debt service payment be made on the stated maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, and accordingly the payment of principal or principal balance, as applicable, referenced in the immediately preceding sentence will be net of the principal portion, if any, of the monthly debt service payment due on such date.
“Net Operating Income” generally means, for any given period (ending on the “NOI Date”), the total operating revenues derived from a Mortgaged Property during that period, minus the total operating expenses incurred in respect of that Mortgaged Property during that period other than:
● | non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, |
● | capital expenditures, and |
● | debt service on the related Mortgage Loan or on any other loans that are secured by that Mortgaged Property; |
165
“NRA” means net rentable area.
“Occupancy Rate” means (i) in the case of multifamily rental properties and manufactured housing community properties, the percentage of rental units or pads, as applicable, that are rented (generally without regard to the length of the lease or rental period) as of the date of determination; (ii) in the case of office, retail and industrial/warehouse properties, the percentage of the net rentable square footage rented as of the date of determination (subject to, in the case of certain Mortgage Loans, one or more of the additional lease-up assumptions); (iii) in the case of hospitality properties, the percentage of available rooms occupied for the trailing 12-month period ending on the date of determination; and (iv) in the case of self storage facilities, either the percentage of the net rentable square footage rented or the percentage of units rented as of the date of determination, depending on borrower reporting. In the case of some of the Mortgage Loans, the calculation of Occupancy Rate for one or more related properties was based on assumptions regarding occupancy, such as: the assumption that a particular tenant at the subject Mortgaged Property that has executed a lease (or, in some cases, a letter of intent to execute a lease), but has not yet taken occupancy and/or has not yet commenced paying rent, will take occupancy on a future date generally expected to occur within 12 months of the Cut-off Date; assumptions regarding the renewal of particular leases and/or the re-leasing of certain space at the subject Mortgaged Property; and certain additional lease-up assumptions as may be described in the footnotes to Annex A-1. For information regarding the determination of the occupancy rates with respect to the 15 largest Mortgage Loans and related Mortgaged Properties, see the individual Mortgage Loan and portfolio descriptions in Annex A-3.
“Occupancy As Of Date” means the date of determination of the Occupancy Rate of a Mortgaged Property.
“Prepayment Provisions” denotes a general summary of the provisions of a Mortgage Loan that restrict the ability of the related borrower to voluntarily prepay the Mortgage Loan. In each case, some exceptions may apply that are not described in the general summary, such as provisions that permit a voluntary partial prepayment in connection with the release of a portion of a Mortgaged Property, or require the application of tenant holdback reserves to a partial prepayment, in each case notwithstanding any lockout period or yield maintenance charge that may otherwise apply. In describing Prepayment Provisions, we use the following symbols with the indicated meanings:
● | “DEF(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which voluntary prepayments of principal are prohibited, but the related borrower is permitted to defease that Mortgage Loan in order to obtain a release of the related Mortgaged Property. |
● | “LO(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which voluntary prepayments of principal are prohibited and defeasance is not permitted. |
● | “O(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which prepayments of principal are permitted without the payment of any Prepayment Premium or Yield Maintenance Charge and the lender is not entitled to require a defeasance in lieu of prepayment. |
166
● | “YM(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which prepayments of principal are permitted with the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge and the lender is not entitled to require a defeasance in lieu of prepayment. |
● | “DEF/@(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which the related borrower is permitted to defease that Mortgage Loan in order to obtain a release of the related Mortgaged Property and during which prepayments of principal are permitted with the payment of a Prepayment Premium (equal to @% of the prepaid amount). |
● | “DEF/YM(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which the related borrower is permitted to defease that Mortgage Loan in order to obtain a release of the related Mortgaged Property and during which prepayments of principal are permitted with the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge. |
● | “DEF/YM@(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which the related borrower is permitted to defease that Mortgage Loan in order to obtain a release of the related Mortgaged Property and during which prepayments of principal are permitted with the payment of the greater of a Yield Maintenance Charge and a Prepayment Premium (equal to @% of the prepaid amount). |
● | “YM@(#)” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, a specified number of monthly payment periods (which number is denoted by a numeric value #) during which prepayments of principal are permitted with the payment of the greater of a Yield Maintenance Charge and a Prepayment Premium (equal to @% of the prepaid amount) and the lender is not entitled to require a defeasance in lieu of prepayment. |
“Remaining Term to Maturity or ARD” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the number of months from the Cut-off Date to the related stated maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date.
“RevPAR” means, with respect to any hotel property, revenue per available room.
“Square Feet”, “SF” or “Sq. Ft.” means, in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a retail center, office, industrial/warehouse facility, any combination of the foregoing or other single purpose property, the square footage of the net rentable or leasable area.
“T-12” and “TTM” each means trailing 12 months.
“Term to Maturity” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the remaining term, in months, from the Cut-off Date for such Mortgage Loan to the related maturity date or, in the case of an ARD Loan, the related Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable. Annex A-1 indicates which Mortgage Loans are ARD Loans.
“Underwritten Expenses” or “U/W Expenses” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, an estimate of (a) operating expenses (such as utilities, administrative expenses, repairs and maintenance, management and franchise fees and advertising); and (b) estimated fixed expenses (such as insurance, real estate taxes and, if applicable, ground, space or air rights lease payments), as determined by the related Mortgage Loan seller and generally derived from historical expenses at the Mortgaged
167
Property, the borrower’s budget or appraiser’s estimate, in some cases adjusted for significant occupancy increases and a market rate management fee and subject to certain assumptions and subjective judgments of each Mortgage Loan seller as described under the definition of “Underwritten Net Operating Income” in this prospectus.
“Underwritten Net Cash Flow”, “Underwritten NCF” or “U/W NCF” means an amount based on assumptions relating to cash flow available for debt service. In general, it is the Underwritten Net Operating Income less all reserves for capital expenditures, including tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions. Underwritten Net Cash Flow generally does not reflect interest expenses, non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization and other non-reoccurring expenses.
In determining the “revenue” component of Underwritten Net Cash Flow for each Mortgaged Property, the related mortgage loan seller generally relied on a rent roll and/or other known, signed tenant leases, executed extension options, property financial statements, estimates in the related appraisal, or other indications of anticipated income (generally supported by market considerations, cash reserves or letters of credit) supplied by the related borrower and, where the actual vacancy shown thereon and, if available, the market vacancy was less than 5%, assumed a minimum 5% vacancy in determining revenue from rents (in certain cases, inclusive of rents under master leases with an affiliate of the borrower that relate to space not used or occupied by the master lease tenant, or, in the case of a hotel property, room rent, food and beverage revenues and other hotel property income), except that in the case of certain non-multifamily and non-manufactured housing community properties, space occupied by such anchor or single tenants or other large creditworthy tenants may have been disregarded (or a rate of less than 5% has been assumed) in performing the vacancy adjustment due to the length of the related leases or creditworthiness of such tenants. Furthermore, Ladder Capital Finance LLC may apply a minimum vacancy that is less than 5% if rents at the subject Mortgaged Property are below market or if it otherwise determines that circumstances so warrant. Where the actual or market vacancy was greater than 5%, the mortgage loan seller determined revenue from rents (in certain cases, inclusive of rents under master leases with an affiliate of the borrower that relate to space not used or occupied by the master lease tenant, or, in the case of a hotel property, room rent, food and beverage revenues and other hotel property income) by generally relying on a rent roll and/or other known, signed leases, executed lease extension options, property financial statements, estimates in the related appraisal, or other indications of anticipated income (generally supported by market considerations, cash reserves or letters of credit) supplied and generally (but not in all cases) the greatest of (a) actual current vacancy at the related Mortgaged Property or a vacancy otherwise based on performance of the related Mortgaged Property (e.g., an economic vacancy based on actual collections for a specified trailing period), (b) if available, current vacancy according to third-party-provided market information or at comparable properties in the same or similar market as the related Mortgaged Property, subject to adjustment to address special considerations (such as where market vacancy may have been ignored with respect to space covered by long-term leases or because it was deemed inapplicable by reason of, among other things, below market rents at or unique characteristics of the subject Mortgaged Property) and/or to reflect the appraiser’s conclusion of a supportable or stabilized occupancy rate, and (c) subject to the discussion above, 5%. In some cases involving a multi-property Mortgage Loan, the foregoing vacancy assumptions may be applied to the portfolio of the related Mortgaged Properties in the entirety, but may not apply to each related Mortgaged Property. In addition, for some Mortgaged Properties, the actual vacancy may reflect the average vacancy over the course of a year (or trailing 12-month period). In determining revenue for multifamily, manufactured housing community and self storage properties, the mortgage loan sellers generally reviewed rental
168
revenue shown on the rolling one-to-twelve month (or some combination thereof) operating statements or annualized the rental revenue and reimbursement of expenses shown on rent rolls or operating statements with respect to the prior one-to-twelve-month periods. In the case of hospitality properties, gross receipts were generally determined based upon the average occupancy not to exceed 80% and daily rates based on third-party-provided market information or average daily rates achieved during the prior one-to-three year annual reporting period. However, Ladder Capital Finance LLC does not apply any such constraints on the underwritten average occupancy for a hospitality property but will take into account the unique circumstances of such property when determining the underwritten average occupancy.
In determining the “expense” component of Underwritten Net Cash Flow for each Mortgaged Property, the related mortgage loan seller generally relied on, to the extent available, historical operating statements, full-year or year-to-date financial statements, rolling 12-month operating statements, year-to-date financial statements and/or budgets supplied by the related borrower, as well as estimates in the related appraisal, except that: (i) if tax or insurance expense information more current than that reflected in the financial statements was available and verified, the newer information was generally used; (ii) property management fees were generally assumed to be 1% to 6% (depending on the property type) of effective gross revenue (or, in the case of a hospitality property, gross receipts); (iii) in general, depending on the property type, assumptions were made with respect to the average amount of reserves for leasing commissions, tenant improvement expenses and capital expenditures; (iv) expenses were assumed to include annual replacement reserves; and (v) recent changes in circumstances at the Mortgaged Properties were taken into account (for example, physical changes that would be expected to reduce utilities costs). Annual replacement reserves were generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or minimum requirements by property type designated by the mortgage loan seller, and are: (a) in the case of retail, office, self storage and industrial/warehouse properties, generally not more than $0.40 per square foot of net rentable commercial area (and may be zero); (b) in the case of multifamily rental apartments, generally not more than approximately $400 per residential unit per year, depending on the condition of the property (and may be zero); (c) in the case of manufactured housing community properties, generally not more than approximately $80 per pad per year, depending on the condition of the property (and may be zero); and (d) in the case of hospitality properties, generally 4% to 5%, inclusive, of gross revenues (and may be zero). In addition, in some cases, the mortgage loan seller recharacterized as capital expenditures items that are reported by borrowers as operating expenses (thus increasing the “net cash flow”).
Historical operating results may not be available for Mortgaged Properties with newly constructed improvements, Mortgaged Properties with triple-net leases, Mortgaged Properties that have recently undergone substantial renovations and newly acquired Mortgaged Properties. In such cases, items of revenue and expense used in calculating Underwritten Net Cash Flow were generally derived from rent rolls, estimates set forth in the related appraisal, leases with tenants, other third-party-provided market information or from other borrower-supplied information. We cannot assure you with respect to the accuracy of the information provided by any borrowers, or the adequacy of the procedures used by the related mortgage loan seller in determining the presented operating information.
For purposes of calculating Underwritten Net Cash Flow for Mortgage Loans where leases have been executed by one or more affiliates of the borrower, the rents under some of such leases, if applicable, have been adjusted downward to reflect market rents for similar
169
properties if the rent actually paid under the lease was significantly higher than the market rent for similar properties.
The amounts described as revenue and expense above are often highly subjective values. In the case of some of the Mortgage Loans, the calculation of Underwritten Net Cash Flow for the related Mortgaged Properties was based on assumptions regarding projected rental income, expenses and/or occupancy, including, without limitation, one or more of the following: (i) the assumption that a particular tenant at a Mortgaged Property that has executed a lease or letter of intent, but has not yet taken occupancy and/or has not yet commenced paying rent, will take occupancy and commence paying rent on a future date generally expected to occur within 12 months of the cut-off date; (ii) the assumption that certain rental income that is to be payable commencing on a future date under a signed lease, but where the subject tenant is in an initial rent abatement or free rent period, will be paid commencing on such future date; (iii) assumptions regarding the probability of renewal or extension of particular leases and/or the re-leasing of certain space at a Mortgaged Property and the anticipated effect on capital and re-leasing expenditures; (iv) assumptions regarding the costs and expenses, including leasing commissions and tenant improvements, associated with leasing vacant space or releasing occupied space at a future date; and (v) assumptions regarding future increases or decreases in expenses, or whether certain expenses are capital expenses or should be treated as expenses which are not recurring. In addition, in the case of some commercial properties, the underwritten revenues were adjusted upward to account for a portion or average of the additional rents provided for under any rent step-ups scheduled to occur over the terms of the executed leases. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any Mortgage Loan will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance. Actual annual net cash flow for a Mortgaged Property may be less than the Underwritten Net Cash Flow presented with respect to that property in this prospectus. In addition, the underwriting analysis of any particular Mortgage Loan as described herein by a particular Mortgage Loan seller may not conform to an analysis of the same property by other persons or entities.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Flawed Assumptions”. See also Annex A-1 and the footnotes thereto for disclosure regarding any variances in the calculation of Underwritten Net Cash Flow.
The “Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratio” or “U/W NCF DSCR” for any Mortgage Loan for any period, as presented in this prospectus, including the tables presented on Annex A-1 and Annex A-2, is the ratio of Underwritten Net Cash Flow calculated for the related Mortgaged Property to the amount of total Annual Debt Service on such Mortgage Loan except that the Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratios for all partial interest-only loans, if any, was calculated based on the first principal and interest payment required to be made to the issuing entity during the term of the Mortgage Loan. However, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, unless otherwise indicated, such debt service coverage ratio was calculated based on the aggregate Annual Debt Service of the Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) as of the Cut-off Date (and, for the avoidance of doubt, without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan). The Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratio for all interest-only loans were calculated based on the sum of the first 12 interest payments following the Cut-off Date.
“Underwritten NCF Debt Yield” or “U/W NCF Debt Yield” generally means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the related Underwritten NCF divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan. However, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, unless otherwise indicated, such debt yield was calculated based on the aggregate principal
170
balance of the Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) (and, for the avoidance of doubt, without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan) as of the Cut-off Date.
No Mortgage Loan included in the Trust has an Underwritten NCF Debt Yield calculated based on the related Cut-off Date Balance less a related earnout or holdback reserve.
“Underwritten Net Operating Income”, “Underwritten NOI” or “U/W NOI” means an amount based on assumptions of the cash flow available for debt service before deductions for capital expenditures, including replacement reserves, tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions. In general, Underwritten Net Operating Income is the assumed revenue derived from the use and operation of a Mortgaged Property, consisting primarily of rental income, less the sum of (a) assumed operating expenses (such as utilities, administrative expenses, repairs and maintenance, management fees and advertising) and (b) fixed expenses, such as insurance, real estate taxes and, if applicable, ground lease payments. Underwritten Net Operating Income is generally estimated in the same manner as Underwritten Net Cash Flow, except that no deduction is made for capital expenditures, including replacement reserves, tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Flawed Assumptions”.
“Underwritten Net Operating Income Debt Service Coverage Ratio” or “U/W NOI DSCR” for any Mortgage Loan for any period, as presented in this prospectus, including the tables presented on Annex A-1 and Annex A-2, is the ratio of Underwritten NOI calculated for the related Mortgaged Property to the amount of total Annual Debt Service on such Mortgage Loan except that the Underwritten Net Operating Income Debt Service Coverage Ratio for all partial interest-only loans, if any, was calculated based on the first principal and interest payment required to be made to the issuing entity during the term of the Mortgage Loan. However, in the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, unless otherwise indicated, such debt service coverage ratio was calculated based on the aggregate Annual Debt Service of the Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) (and, for the avoidance of doubt, without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan) as of the Cut-off Date. The Underwritten Net Operating Income Debt Service Coverage Ratios for all interest-only Mortgage Loans were calculated based on the sum of the first 12 interest payments following the Cut-off Date.
“Underwritten NOI Debt Yield” or “U/W NOI Debt Yield” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the related Underwritten NOI divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan. In the case of a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, unless otherwise indicated, such debt yield was calculated based on the aggregate principal balance of the Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) (and, for the avoidance of doubt, without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan) as of the Cut-off Date.
“Underwritten Revenues” or “U/W Revenues” with respect to any Mortgage Loan means the gross potential rent (in certain cases, inclusive of rents under master leases with an affiliate of the borrower that relate to space not used or occupied by the master lease tenant, or, in the case of a hotel property, room rent, food and beverage revenues and other hotel property income), subject to the assumptions and subjective judgments of each mortgage loan seller as described under the definition of “Underwritten Net Operating Income” above.
“Units”, “Rooms”, “Beds” or “Pads” means (a) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as multifamily housing, the number of apartments, regardless of the size of or
171
number of rooms in such apartment, (b) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a hotel property, the number of guest rooms, (c) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a manufactured housing community property, the number of pads for manufactured homes, (d) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operating as student housing, the number of beds, or (e) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a self storage property, the number of individual storage units.
“Weighted Average Mortgage Rate” means the weighted average of the Mortgage Rates as of the Cut-off Date.
You should review the footnotes to Annex A-1 for information regarding certain other loan-specific adjustments regarding the calculation of debt service coverage ratio information, loan-to-value ratio information, debt yield information and/or loan per net rentable square foot or unit with respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans.
Except as otherwise specifically stated, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD, Underwritten NCF Debt Yield, Underwritten NOI Debt Yield and loan per net rentable square foot or unit statistics with respect to each Mortgage Loan are calculated and presented without regard to any indebtedness other than the Mortgage Loan, whether or not secured by the related Mortgaged Property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise, that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future.
References to “Weighted Averages” of the Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool or any particular sub-group of the mortgage loans are references to averages weighted on the basis of the Cut-off Date Balances of the subject Mortgage Loans.
If we present a debt rating for some tenants and not others in the tables, you should assume that the other tenants are not rated and/or have below-investment grade ratings. If a tenant has a rated parent or affiliate, we present the rating of that parent or affiliate, notwithstanding that the parent or affiliate may itself have no obligations under the lease. Presentation of a rating opposite a tenant should not be construed as a statement that the relevant tenant will perform or be able to perform its obligations.
The sum in any column of any of the tables in Annex A-2 may not equal the indicated total due to rounding.
Historical information presented in this prospectus, including information in Annex A-1 and Annex A-3, is derived from audited and/or unaudited financial statements provided by the borrowers. In each case, the historical information is taken from the same source with respect to a Mortgage Loan and subject to the same adjustments and considerations as described above with respect to the 15 largest Mortgage Loans under the definition of “Cash Flow Analysis”.
172
Mortgage Pool Characteristics
Overview
Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Characteristics
All Mortgage Loans | |
Initial Pool Balance(1) | $1,045,167,892 |
Number of Mortgage Loans | 67 |
Number of Mortgaged Properties | 126 |
Range of Cut-off Date Balances | $896,000 to $60,000,000 |
Average Cut-off Date Balance | $15,599,521 |
Range of Mortgage Rates | 2.740% to 6.160% |
Weighted average Mortgage Rate | 4.724% |
Range of original terms to maturity or ARD(2) | 60 months to 120 months |
Weighted average original term to maturity or ARD(2) | 116 months |
Range of remaining terms to maturity or ARD(2) | 56 months to 120 months |
Weighted average remaining term to maturity or ARD(2) | 115 months |
Range of original amortization terms(3) | 300 months to 360 months |
Weighted average original amortization term(3) | 356 months |
Range of remaining amortization terms(3) | 300 months to 360 months |
Weighted average remaining amortization term(3) | 356 months |
Range of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(4)(5) | 22.5% to 75.0% |
Weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(4)(5) | 59.5% |
Range of LTV Ratios as of the maturity date or ARD(2)(4)(5) | 22.5% to 70.0% |
Weighted average LTV Ratio as of the maturity date or ARD(2)(4)(5) | 55.4% |
Range of U/W NCF DSCRs(4)(6) | 1.25x to 4.28x |
Weighted average U/W NCF DSCR(4)(6) | 1.92x |
Range of U/W NOI Debt Yields(4) | 7.0% to 16.2% |
Weighted average U/W NOI Debt Yield(4) | 10.8% |
Percentage of Initial Pool Balance consisting of: | |
Full IO | 56.8% |
Amortizing | 23.7% |
Partial IO | 19.2% |
Full IO, ARD | 0.3% |
(1) | Subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%. |
(2) | With respect to any Mortgage Loan with an Anticipated Repayment Date, calculated through or as of the related Anticipated Repayment Date. |
(3) | Excludes thirty-one (31) Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, CrossPoint, Moore Plaza, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, University Properties Portfolio, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio, Residence Inn Irvine, GNL Industrial Portfolio, BlueLinx Portfolio, El Dorado Tech Center, 1990 NASA Boulevard, Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion, Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, Concord Place, Fortuna Center Plaza, Firehouse Self Storage, Tarzana Village, A Storage Place - Evergreen, Las Brisas MHC, Storage Direct Roseville, Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio, East Sac Self Storage, Canyon Gate Self Storage, 645-679 Manor Drive, Walgreens – Harlingen, TX, Walgreens – Dallas, GA, Walgreens – Guthrie, OK, Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, representing approximately 57.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, that are interest only for the entire term or until the Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable. |
(4) | In the case of eight (8) Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, Tryad Industrial & Business Center, CrossPoint, Houston Distribution Center, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, BlueLinx Portfolio and Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 33.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, each of which has one or more Pari Passu Companion Loans and/or Subordinate Companion Loans that are not included in the issuing entity, the DSCR, LTV Ratio and debt yield have been calculated including the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) but excluding any related Subordinate Companion Loan. With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratio calculated including the related Subordinate Companion Loan are 44.9% and 1.68x, respectively. |
173
(5) | Unless otherwise indicated under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value”, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and LTV Ratio as of the maturity date have been calculated using the “as-is” appraised value. |
(6) | Debt service coverage ratios are calculated using the average of the principal and interest payments for the first twelve payment periods of the Mortgage Loan following the Cut-off Date; provided that (i) in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for interest-only payments through maturity or its Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, such items are calculated based on the interest payments scheduled to be due on the first due date following the Cut-off Date and the 11 due dates thereafter for such Mortgage Loan and (ii) in the case of a Mortgage Loan that provides for an initial interest-only period that ends prior to maturity or its Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, and provides for scheduled amortization payments thereafter, such items are calculated based on the monthly payment of principal and interest payable for the 12 payment periods immediately following the expiration of the interest-only period. |
The issuing entity will include eleven (11) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 25.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, that represent the obligations of multiple borrowers that are liable (other than by reason of cross-collateralization provisions and/or tenancies-in-common borrower structures) on a joint and several basis for the repayment of the entire indebtedness evidenced by the related Mortgage Loans.
See also “—Certain Calculations and Definitions” above for important general and specific information regarding the manner of calculation of the underwritten debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios. See also “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans” below for important information relating to certain payment and other terms of the Mortgage Loans.
174
Property Types
The table below shows the property type concentrations of the Mortgaged Properties:
Property Type Distribution(1)
Property Type | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance(1) | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | |||
Office | ||||||
Suburban | 11 | $206,000,000 | 19.7% | |||
Medical | 3 | 31,200,000 | 3.0 | |||
CBD | 1 | 12,750,000 | 1.2 | |||
Subtotal: | 15 | $249,950,000 | 23.9% | |||
Retail | ||||||
Anchored | 20 | $171,923,773 | 16.4% | |||
Free-Standing | 23 | 47,209,798 | 4.5 | |||
Shadow Anchored | 4 | 16,983,709 | 1.6 | |||
Unanchored | 2 | 7,006,765 | 0.7 | |||
Subtotal: | 49 | $243,124,046 | 23.3% | |||
Industrial | ||||||
Warehouse/Distribution | 21 | $139,244,652 | 13.3% | |||
Flex | 1 | 56,440,256 | 5.4 | |||
Flex/R&D | 1 | 13,341,000 | 1.3 | |||
Light Industrial | 1 | 4,098,300 | 0.4 | |||
Manufacturing | 1 | 2,667,500 | 0.3 | |||
Subtotal: | 25 | $215,791,708 | 20.6% | |||
Multifamily | ||||||
Garden | 9 | $38,287,500 | 3.7% | |||
Student Housing | 1 | 34,500,000 | 3.3 | |||
High Rise | 2 | 15,000,000 | 1.4 | |||
Mid Rise | 1 | 2,312,500 | 0.2 | |||
Subtotal: | 13 | $90,100,000 | 8.6% | |||
Mixed Use | ||||||
Office/Garage/Retail | 1 | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | |||
Retail/Office | 2 | 22,988,022 | 2.2 | |||
Medical/Office/Retail | 1 | 6,550,000 | 0.6 | |||
Multifamily/Retail | 2 | 4,687,500 | 0.4 | |||
Office/Retail | 1 | 4,500,000 | 0.4 | |||
Subtotal: | 7 | $83,725,522 | 8.0% | |||
Hospitality | ||||||
Limited Service | 6 | $41,892,296 | 4.0% | |||
Extended Stay | 3 | 40,500,000 | 3.9 | |||
Subtotal: | 9 | $82,392,296 | 7.9% | |||
Self Storage | ||||||
Self Storage | 6 | $47,584,320 | 4.6% | |||
Subtotal: | 6 | $47,584,320 | 4.6% | |||
Manufactured Housing Community | ||||||
Manufactured Housing Community | 2 | $32,500,000 | 3.1% | |||
Subtotal: | 2 | $32,500,000 | 3.1% | |||
Total | 126 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% |
(1) | Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not Mortgage Loans, the information for Mortgage Loans secured by more than one Mortgaged Property is based on allocated loan amounts as set forth in Annex A-1. |
175
Office Properties
In the case of the office properties and mixed use properties with an office component set forth in the above chart, we note the following:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Concord Place, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property contains an attached parking garage with 523 parking spaces. The annual revenue of such parking garage comprises approximately 2.9% of the related Mortgaged Property’s effective gross income. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Office Properties Have Special Risks”.
Retail Properties
In the case of the retail properties and mixed use properties with retail components set forth in the above chart, we note the following:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured in part by Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio – San Pedro Crossing, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, Toys “R” Us is a tenant representing approximately 29.3% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property. Toys “R” Us filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in September 2017. The Toys “R” Us space was underwritten as vacant. In addition, on February 4, 2018, The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., which is the parent company of Elder Beerman, the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property identified as AFIN Portfolio - Northpark Center and the fifth largest tenant at AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 32.0% and 4.2% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property and the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, respectively, announced that it filed for bankruptcy protection. Elder Beerman’s annual underwritten base rent is approximately $407,360, representing approximately 15.0% of the underwritten base rent at the Mortgaged Property and approximately 1.5% of the underwritten base rent at the portfolio. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property benefits from a reciprocal easement agreement (the “REA”) that grants the Mortgaged Property a perpetual easement to use approximately 2,590 parking spaces (the “Parking Easement”) on an adjacent property (the “National Property”) owned by NAI Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (“National Inc.”); there are currently 2,745 parking spaces available on the National Property. The REA requires that the Mortgaged Property be primarily used for office and/or research and development and related ancillary purposes. Other uses require the prior written consent of National Inc., which may not be unreasonably withheld so long as the proposed use would not result in a material increase in use of the parking area during evening, nighttime and holiday hours. In 2016, National Inc. notified the borrower that it was aware of a tenant, Tavern in the Square, that was operating a restaurant in violation of the REA. National Inc. did not object to the existence of the tenant, but expressly reserved its right to insist on strict compliance with the use restrictions in the REA in the future. National Inc. did not allege any default by the borrower in the estoppel delivered in connection with closing of the Mortgage Loan. The REA also requires that if 950,000 square feet or more at the Mortgaged Property is leased or |
176
occupied, then the borrower is required to provide at least 1,279 spaces for use by tenants, which spaces are required to be located on the Mortgaged Property, other available easement areas or an off-site parking garage leased by borrower for such purpose. The boundary line between the City of Lowell and the Town of Chelmsford passes through the Mortgaged Property, which is predominantly located in the City of Lowell. 85 parking spaces (the “Chelmsford Spaces”) are located within the Town of Chelmsford, and are considered a legally non-conforming use; however, the Town of Chelmsford zoning code allows for the continued use of the Chelmsford Spaces unless the borrower abandons the use of the Chelmsford Spaces as parking spaces for at least two years. In the event the borrower discontinues the use of the Chelmsford Spaces and the Town of Chelmsford exercises its right to prohibit parking, the borrower would no longer have sufficient parking spaces to satisfy the requirement of the REA; however, failure to comply with this restriction does not affect borrower’s rights with respect to the Parking Easement. |
With respect to certain retail properties, some or all of the related tenants may not be required to continue to operate (i.e., such tenants may “go dark”) at such properties. With respect to any such tenant that has a right to go dark, if such tenant elects to go dark, such election may trigger co-tenancy clauses in other tenants’ leases.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Retail Properties Have Special Risks”, and “—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”, and “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below.
Industrial Properties
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Industrial Properties Have Special Risks”.
Multifamily Properties
With respect to the multifamily properties and mixed use properties with a multifamily component set forth in the above chart, we note the following:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, 242 of the 690 units at the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers - Yorkshire Towers Mortgaged Property and 72 of the 137 units at the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers - Lexington Towers Mortgaged Property are rent stabilized. If and when tenants of such rent stabilized units vacate, the borrower sponsor intends to renovate such apartments, with the expectation of converting each such unit to a market rent unit. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – Saint John’s Mortgaged Property was previously subject to New York City rent stabilization laws, but currently, all of the units at the related Mortgaged Property are occupied by market rate tenants. A tenant at the related Mortgaged Property filed an overcharge complaint with the New York City Department of Housing and Community Renewal. See “—Litigation and Other Considerations” below. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks”.
177
Mixed Use Properties
In the case of the mixed use properties set forth in the above chart, we note the following:
● | Each such mixed use Mortgaged Property has two or more retail, office, medical, multifamily or parking components. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Retail Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Office Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks” and “—Parking Properties Have Special Risks”, as applicable. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as City Square and Clay Street, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property contains an attached parking garage with 1,154 parking spaces. The annual revenue of such parking garage comprises approximately 26.4% of the related Mortgaged Property’s effective gross income. |
● | Certain of the mixed use Mortgaged Properties may have specialty uses. See “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”. |
Hotel Properties
In the case of the hotel properties set forth in the above chart, we note the following:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Holiday Inn Express Trinity, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the appraisal identified a recently opened a 110 room hospitality property located approximately 5.4 miles from the Mortgaged Property as directly competitive with the Mortgaged Property. The appraisal also noted that a 110 room hospitality property expected to be directly competitive with the Mortgaged Property and located approximately 5.4 miles from the Mortgaged Property is expected to open in mid-2019. |
For a description of scheduled PIPs with respect to certain Mortgaged Properties, see “—Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion”.
The following table shows the breakdown of each Mortgaged Property associated with a hotel brand through a license agreement, franchise agreement, operating agreement or management agreement.
178
Mortgaged Property Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | Percentage (%) of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | Expiration/Termination of Related License/ Franchise Agreement, Operating Agreement or Management Agreement | Maturity Date of the Related Mortgage Loan | ||||
Residence Inn Irvine | $33,000,000 | 3.2% | 12/31/2021 | 2/1/2028 | ||||
Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | $12,386,589 | 1.2% | 6/30/2036 | 1/1/2028 | ||||
Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | $8,111,647 | 0.8% | 7/20/2036 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
Holiday Inn Express Trinity | $8,000,000 | 0.8% | 12/9/2035 | 2/1/2028 | ||||
Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio – Hampton Inn | $4,900,000 | 0.5% | 4/30/2027 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio - Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | $3,882,979 | 0.4% | 3/12/2030 | 2/1/2023 | ||||
WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio - Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | $3,617,021 | 0.3% | 2/5/2030 | 2/1/2023 | ||||
Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio – Comfort Inn | $3,000,000 | 0.3% | 12/26/2040 | 2/6/2028 |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Hotel Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Risks Relating to Affiliation with a Franchise or Hotel Management Company”, “—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” as well as “—Specialty Use Concentrations”.
Self Storage Properties
With respect to the self storage properties set forth in the above chart:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Firehouse Self Storage, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property has 138 uncovered vehicle parking spaces, which collectively generate approximately 4.0% of the underwritten revenues. In addition, one storage facility located approximately 3.3 miles from the related Mortgaged Property is currently under construction and is expected to add approximately 100,000 square feet of self storage to the related Mortgaged Property’s competitive market. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as A Storage Place - Evergreen, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, three commercial tenants, representing approximately 11.8% of the underwritten revenue, are currently operating at the Mortgaged Property without certificates of occupancy. The municipal planning department permits the tenants to operate while the certificates of occupancy are obtained and the Mortgage Loan agreement contains covenants requiring the borrower to apply for and file all documentation required to cause the issuance of such certificates within 60 days of loan origination and diligently pursue the issuance of such certificates. The Mortgage Loan is recourse for losses and/or for failure to have any required |
179
certificate of occupancy for failure to comply with the covenant to apply for and pursue the certificates of occupancy. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as East Sac Self Storage, representing approximately 0.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property has 48 wine storage units, 36 open parking spaces and one commercial unit that is rented as a large storage space, which collectively generate approximately 9.2% of the underwritten revenues. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Self Storage Properties Have Special Risks”.
Manufactured Housing Community Properties
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Manufactured Housing Community Properties Have Special Risks”, “—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus, and “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below.
Specialty Use Concentrations
Certain Mortgaged Properties have one of the 5 largest tenants by net rentable area identified on Annex A-1 that operates its space in whole or in part as a specialty use that may not allow the space to be readily converted to be suitable for another type of tenant, as set forth in the following table.
Specialty Use | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | ||
Restaurant(1) | 15 | 8.5% | ||
Medical/laboratory(2) | 10 | 8.0% | ||
Gym, fitness center or a health club(3) | 1 | 4.3% | ||
Grocery store(4) | 4 | 3.6% | ||
Hair and/or nail salon(5) | 4 | 3.3% | ||
Bank branch(6) | 3 | 3.3% | ||
Theater/entertainment facility(7) | 1 | 1.5% | ||
Brewery(8) | 1 | 1.5% | ||
Laundromat(9) | 1 | 1.2% | ||
School(10) | 1 | 1.0% |
(1) | Includes the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio - Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio - Chili’s - McHenry, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio - Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio - Sonic - Robertsdale, AL, The Village at La Orilla, Fortuna Center Plaza, 10 Park Place South, Dorset & Market Street, National NNN Retail Portfolio – Bradley Retail, Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony, Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – Dekalb, 100 Fairfield, School Street Crossing, Plaza Point Shopping Center and Boulevard I & II. |
(2) | Includes the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion, South Bend Medical Office, 10 Park Place South, Tarzana Village, 249 E Ocean Blvd, National NNN Retail Portfolio – Joliet Retail, Westhaven Town Center, Boulevard I & II and Clarksville Shops. |
(3) | Includes the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as City Square and Clay Street. |
(4) | Includes the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Fortuna Center Plaza, Quakertown Shopping Center, AFIN Portfolio - Best on the Boulevard and School Street Crossing. |
(5) | Includes the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Quakertown Shopping Center, Tarzana Village, Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony and Clarksville Shops. |
(6) | Includes the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as The Village at La Orilla, Quakertown Shopping Center and Westhaven Town Center. |
180
(7) | Includes the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Village at La Orilla. |
(8) | Includes the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Village at La Orilla. |
(9) | Includes the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Quakertown Shopping Center. |
(10) | Includes the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park – 230 Park Place. |
With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Boulevard I & II, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, such Mortgaged Property has a dry cleaner tenant with on-site processing operations.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses”.
181
Mortgage Loan Concentrations
Top Fifteen Mortgage Loans
The following table shows certain information regarding the 15 largest Mortgage Loans by Cut-off Date Balance:
Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | Loan Per Unit(1) | U/W NCF DSCR(1) |
|
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1) | Property Type | |||||
AFIN Portfolio | $60,000,000 | 5.7% | $87 | 2.34x | 56.5% | Retail | ||||||
Tryad Industrial & Business Center | $56,440,256 | 5.4% | $33 | 1.42x | 52.6% | Industrial | ||||||
CrossPoint | $50,000,000 | 4.8% | $114 | 2.24x | 60.0% | Office | ||||||
Houston Distribution Center | $49,000,000 | 4.7% | $56 | 1.44x | 58.3% | Industrial | ||||||
Moore Plaza | $47,500,000 | 4.5% | $126 | 2.27x | 60.2% | Retail | ||||||
City Square and Clay Street | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $366 | 1.76x | 49.7% | Mixed Use | ||||||
Park Place at Florham Park | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $176 | 1.80x | 65.1% | Office | ||||||
University Properties Portfolio | $34,500,000 | 3.3% | $100,877 | 1.95x | 58.8% | Multifamily | ||||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | $33,400,000 | 3.2% | $73 | 2.81x | 53.4% | Various | ||||||
Residence Inn Irvine | $33,000,000 | 3.2% | $189,655 | 2.65x | 60.0% | Hospitality | ||||||
GNL Industrial Portfolio | $32,750,000 | 3.1% | $52 | 2.76x | 52.3% | Industrial | ||||||
BlueLinx Portfolio | $28,600,000 | 2.7% | $31 | 2.46x | 64.2% | Industrial | ||||||
El Dorado Tech Center | $25,350,000 | 2.4% | $140 | 1.88x | 60.6% | Office | ||||||
Harford Village MHC | $23,500,000 | 2.2% | $48,755 | 1.25x | 65.5% | Manufactured Housing Community | ||||||
The Offices at Sam Houston | $22,000,000 | 2.1% | $203 | 1.61x | 63.8% | Office | ||||||
Top 3 Total/Weighted Average | $166,440,256 | 15.9% | 2.00x | 56.2% | ||||||||
Top 5 Total/Weighted Average | $262,940,256 | 25.2% | 1.94x | 57.3% | ||||||||
Top 15 Total/Weighted Average | $586,040,256 | 56.1% | 2.04x | 58.1% |
(1) | In the case of each of the Mortgage Loans that is part of a Whole Loan, the calculation of the Loan Per Unit, U/W NCF DSCR and Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for each such Mortgage Loan is calculated based on the principal balance, debt service payment and Underwritten Net Cash Flow for the Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan in the aggregate, but unless otherwise expressly stated, excludes any Subordinate Companion Loan. |
See “—Assessment of Property Value and Condition” below for additional information.
For more information regarding the 15 largest Mortgage Loans and/or loan concentrations and related Mortgaged Properties, see the individual Mortgage Loan and portfolio descriptions in Annex A-3. Other than with respect to the top 15 Mortgage Loans identified in the table above, each of the other Mortgage Loans represents no more than 2.1% of the Initial Pool Balance.
182
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses”.
Multi-Property Mortgage Loans and Related Borrower Mortgage Loans
Certain Mortgage Loans set forth in the table below, collectively representing approximately 27.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, are each secured by two or more properties. In some cases, however, the amount of the mortgage lien encumbering a particular property or portfolio of properties may be less than the full amount of indebtedness under the Mortgage Loan, generally to minimize recording tax. In such instances, the mortgage amount may equal a specified percentage (generally ranging from 100% to 150%, inclusive) of the appraised value or allocated loan amount for the particular Mortgaged Property. This would limit the extent to which proceeds from that property would be available to offset declines in value of the other Mortgaged Properties securing the same Mortgage Loan(s).
The table below shows each individual Mortgage Loan that is secured by two or more Mortgaged Properties.
Multi-Property Mortgage Loans(1)
Mortgage Loan/Property Portfolio Names | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx.
% of | |||
AFIN Portfolio | $60,000,000 | 5.7 | % | ||
Park Place at Florham Park | 45,000,000 | 4.3 | |||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | 33,400,000 | 3.2 | |||
GNL Industrial Portfolio | 32,750,000 | 3.1 | |||
BlueLinx Portfolio | 28,600,000 | 2.7 | |||
South Bend Medical Office | 15,200,000 | 1.5 | |||
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 15,000,000 | 1.4 | |||
Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 14,400,000 | 1.4 | |||
Seal Multifamily Portfolio | 12,900,000 | 1.2 | |||
National NNN Retail Portfolio | 9,590,475 | 0.9 | |||
Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | 7,900,000 | 0.8 | |||
WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | 7,500,000 | 0.7 | |||
Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | 7,000,000 | 0.7 |
|||
Total | $289,240,475 | 27.7 |
% |
(1) | Total may not equal the sum of such amounts listed due to rounding. |
In some cases, an individual Mortgaged Property may be comprised of two or more parcels that may not be contiguous and owned by the same borrower or may be owned by separate borrowers.
The following table shows each group of Mortgage Loans having borrowers that are related to each other. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—
183
Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses” in addition to Annex A-1 and the related footnotes.
Related Borrower Loans(1)
Mortgage Loan Names | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | |||||||||
Group 1: | ||||||||||||
AFIN Portfolio | 12 | $ | 60,000,000 | 5.7 | % | |||||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | 22 | 33,400,000 | 3.2 | |||||||||
Total for Group 1: | 34 | $ | 93,400,000 | 8.9 | % | |||||||
Group 2: | ||||||||||||
Firehouse Self Storage | 1 | $ | 13,000,000 | 1.2 | % | |||||||
East Sac Self Storage | 1 | 6,150,000 | 0.6 | |||||||||
Total for Group 2: | 2 | $ | 19,150,000 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
Group 3: | ||||||||||||
Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | 1 | $ | 3,250,000 | 0.3 | % | |||||||
Walgreens - Dallas, GA | 1 | 2,800,000 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Walgreens – Guthrie, OK | 1 | 2,742,750 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||
Total for Group 3: | 3 | $ | 8,792,750 | 0.8 | % | |||||||
Group 4: | ||||||||||||
Dollar General Winterset | 1 | $ | 945,000 | 0.1 | % | |||||||
Dollar General Bay City | 1 | 927,500 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Dollar General Rockford | 1 | 896,000 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Total for Group 4: | 3 | $ | 2,768,500 | 0.3 | % |
(1) | Totals may not equal the sum of such amounts listed due to rounding. |
Mortgage Loans with related borrowers are identified under “Affiliated Sponsor” on Annex A-1. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses” in addition to Annex A-1 and the related footnotes.
Geographic Concentrations
The table below shows the states that have concentrations of Mortgaged Properties that secure 5.0% or more of the Initial Pool Balance:
Geographic Distribution(1)
State | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | % of Initial Pool | |||||||||
California | 10 | $162,300,000 | 15.5 | % | ||||||||
Texas | 7 | $136,442,813 | 13.1 | % | ||||||||
New York | 15 | $92,564,321 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||
Indiana | 5 | $60,350,000 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
Massachusetts | 2 | $59,327,500 | 5.7 | % |
(1) | Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not the Mortgage Loans, the information for any Mortgaged Property that is one of multiple Mortgaged Properties securing a particular Mortgage Loan is based on an allocated loan amount as stated in Annex A-2. |
184
The remaining Mortgaged Properties are located throughout thirty-three (33) other states and the District of Columbia, with no more than 4.7% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount secured by Mortgaged Properties located in any such jurisdiction.
In addition, with respect to the Mortgaged Properties in the Mortgage Pool, we note the following in respect of their geographic concentration:
● | Thirteen (13) Mortgaged Properties, collectively representing approximately 18.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zones 3 or 4). Seismic reports were prepared with respect to these Mortgaged Properties (other than the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Las Brisas MHC, for which no such report was obtained), and based on those reports, no Mortgaged Property has a seismic expected loss greater than 19%. |
● | Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are located within 25 miles of the coast of the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic coast of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or North Carolina, which areas are more susceptible to hurricanes. See representation and warranty no. 16 in Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble in Annex D-1). |
Mortgaged Properties With Limited Prior Operating History
With respect to fifty-four (54) of the Mortgaged Properties or the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties securing eighteen (18) Mortgage Loans collectively representing approximately 23.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, are secured by Mortgaged Properties that (i) were constructed or the subject of a major renovation that was completed within 12 calendar months prior to the Cut-off Date and, therefore, the related Mortgaged Property has no or limited prior operating history, (ii) have a borrower or an affiliate under the related Mortgage Loan that acquired the related Mortgaged Property within 12 calendar months prior to the Cut-off Date and such borrower or affiliate was unable to provide the related mortgage loan seller with historical financial information (or provided limited historical financial information) for such acquired Mortgaged Property or (iii) are subject to triple net leases with a related tenant where the related borrower did not provide the related mortgage loan seller with historical financial information for the related Mortgaged Property.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Limited Information Causes Uncertainty”.
Tenancies-in-Common or Diversified Ownership
With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion, Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, Concord Place, Firehouse Self Storage, Kohl’s - Jensen Beach, Kohl’s Neenah and East Sac Self Storage, representing in the aggregate 8.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgage Loans have one or more borrowers that own all or a portion of the related Mortgaged Property as tenants-in-common, and the respective tenants-in-common have agreed to a waiver of their rights of partition. “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” and “—Tenancies-in-Common May Hinder Recovery”.
185
Shari’ah Compliant Loan
The Mortgage Loan identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, was structured as a Shari’ah compliant loan. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Shari’ah Compliant Loans”.
The purpose of Shari’ah compliant lending structures is to provide financing to those that follow the Islamic faith and want to comply with Shari’ah laws. Although there are many requirements under Shari’ah laws that affect lending, the rule most affecting the standard loan structure is that Shari’ah laws prohibit transaction involving the payment of interest. This is based on the Shari’ah principle that it is unacceptable, in and of itself, for money to increase in value merely by being lent to another person. To accommodate the prohibition on interest, the structure is generally set up so that, although the Shari’ah compliant party is paying the amount that the lender would expect to receive as principal and interest payments, the payments themselves are characterized as rent. This is accomplished through the use of a non-compliant party that receives a traditional loan, and leases the property to the Shari’ah compliant party using a master lease (with the Shari’ah compliant party having an option to purchase at the end of the term of the Mortgage Loan).
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgage Loan is structured with a master lease and operating lease in order to comply with Shari’ah law. The four borrowers are directly owned by individuals affiliated with a third party corporate services company, GSS Contract Servicers V, Inc. The borrowers master leased the Mortgaged Properties to four newly created entities that are 98% indirectly owned by investors of the Islamic faith and 2% owned by an entity owned by certain principals and employees of the Brennan Ventures LLC, of which each carve-out guarantor is a principal or employee. Such master lessee entities are each controlled by principals of the Brennan Ventures LLC. The master lessees pay rent to the borrowers in an aggregate amount that equals the debt service and other required payments under the Mortgage Loan documents and, pursuant to the terms of the master lease, are subject to the same operation and maintenance requirements as the borrowers. The master lessees subleased the Mortgaged Properties to BIP Operating Corp. (the “Operating Lessee”), which is wholly owned by GSS Contract Services VI Inc. The tenant leases at the Mortgaged Properties are between the tenants and the Operating Lessee. Pursuant to the operating lease, the Operating Lessee passes through all of its rights and obligations with respect to the Mortgaged Properties and the tenant leases to the master lessees. The master lessees and Operating Lessee assigned their interests in the leases and rents from the Mortgaged Properties to the borrowers, who in turn assigned such rights to the lender as additional security for the Mortgage Loan.
Condominium Interests
Two (2) of the Mortgaged Properties, identified on Annex A-1 as University Properties Portfolio and Quakertown Shopping Center, collectively representing approximately 4.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are secured, in whole or in part, by the related borrower’s interest in one or more units in a condominium. With respect to such Mortgaged Properties, the borrower generally controls the appointment and voting of the condominium board or the condominium owners cannot take actions or cause the condominium association to take actions that would affect the borrower’s unit without the borrower’s consent.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, representing approximately 4.3% of
186
the Initial Pool Balance, in connection with the release of a Mortgaged Property as described under “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases” below, provided that no event of default is continuing, the borrower is permitted to convert the Mortgaged Property to a commercial condominium form of ownership, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) the condominium consists of no more than four commercial condominium units, each corresponding to and encompassing one building at the Mortgaged Property, (ii) delivery of a REMIC opinion, (iii) approval of all condominium documents by governmental authorities, (iv) the conversion does not have a material adverse effect on the operation of the remaining Mortgaged Properties as an office park and (v) the borrower’s payment of the lender’s reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with such conversion.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Quakertown Shopping Center, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is subject to a condominium regime that is not controlled by the borrower. The borrower has a 38% interest and the right to appoint one of the three condominium board members. The owner of an adjacent, non-collateral Lowe’s store has a 62% interest in the condominium regime, and has the right to appoint two of the three condominium board members. The condominium board has the right to levy assessments and to enforce rights for unpaid assessments, as well as to determine an annual budget. The borrower does not have the unilateral right to reject the annual budget or otherwise veto any action of the condominium board.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Westhaven Town Center, representing approximately 0.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property includes commercial space in two buildings as to which documentation has been submitted for conversion to condominiums. In addition, the related Mortgaged Property is part of a much larger owners’ association. The related borrower will not have control over the relevant governing bodies.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Condominium Ownership May Limit Use and Improvements”.
Fee & Leasehold Estates; Ground Leases
The table below shows the distribution of underlying interests encumbered by the mortgages related to the Mortgaged Properties:
Underlying Estate Distribution(1)
Underlying Estate | Number of Mortgaged Properties | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | |||||||||
Fee Simple(2) | 121 | $979,481,302 | 93.7 | % | ||||||||
Leasehold | 5 | 65,686,589 | 6.3 | |||||||||
Total | 126 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not Mortgage Loans, the information for Mortgage Loans secured by more than one Mortgaged Property is based on allocated loan amounts as set forth in Annex A-1. |
(2) | An encumbered interest will be characterized as a “fee interest” and not a leasehold interest if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the Mortgaged Property (provided that if the borrower has a leasehold interest in any portion of the Mortgaged Property, such portion is not, individually or in the aggregate, material to the use or operation of the Mortgaged Property), or (ii) the Mortgage Loan is secured by |
187
the borrower’s leasehold interest in the Mortgaged Property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related Mortgaged Property. |
In general except as noted in the exceptions to representation and warranty no. 34 in Annex D-1 indicated on Annex D-2 or otherwise discussed below, and unless the related fee interest is also encumbered by the related Mortgage, each of the ground leases: (i) has a term that extends at least 20 years beyond the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan (taking into account all freely exercisable extension options); and (ii) contains customary mortgagee protection provisions, including notice and cure rights and the right to enter into a new lease with the applicable ground lessor in the event a ground lease is rejected or terminated.
Mortgage loans secured by ground leases present certain bankruptcy and foreclosure risks not present with Mortgage Loans secured by fee simple estates. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Ground Leases and Other Leasehold Interests” and “—Leased Fee Properties Have Special Risks”, “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Environmental Considerations
An environmental report was prepared for each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan no more than thirteen months prior to the Cut-off Date. See Annex A-1 for the date of the environmental report for each Mortgaged Property. The environmental reports were generally prepared pursuant to the ASTM International (“ASTM”) standard for a Phase I environmental site assessment (the “ESA”). In addition to the Phase I standards, some of the environmental reports will include additional research, such as limited sampling for asbestos-containing material, lead-based paint, radon or water damage with limited areas of potential or identified mold, depending on the property use and/or age. Additionally, as warranted pursuant to ASTM standards, supplemental Phase II site investigations have been completed for some Mortgaged Properties to further evaluate certain environmental issues, including certain recognized environmental conditions (each, a “REC”). A Phase II investigation generally consists of sampling and laboratory analysis.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result In Losses”. See also “—Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations” for disclosure regarding Mortgage Loans as to which there is no third-party environmental indemnitor. See also representation and warranty no. 40 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
Described below is certain additional information regarding environmental issues at the Mortgaged Properties securing the Mortgage Loans:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 5.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESAs did not note any RECs; however, the ESA for the Mortgaged Property identified as Shoppes of West Melbourne indicated the former presence of a dry cleaner at the Mortgaged Property as a business environmental risk. The borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy from Berkeley Specialty Underwriting Managers, which has an A.M. Best rating of “A-” or better, with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy provides coverage during the term of the Mortgage Loan and an optional three year tail. |
188
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the ESA did not identify a REC with respect to the Mortgaged Property; however, the Mortgage Loan documents do not provide for recourse to the related guarantor for breaches of the environmental covenants. In lieu of an environmental indemnity signed by a guarantor, the borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy (lender is an additional insured) issued by Beazley Insurance Company Inc. with limits of $5,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate, and has a $50,000 deductible. In the event of default, by way of endorsement, the policy can be assigned to lender as the first named insured. The policy provides coverage during the 10 year term of the Mortgage Loan with an automatic three-year extension option and the premium was paid in full at origination. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Moore Plaza, representing approximately 4.5%, of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA identified a former dry cleaner as a recognized environmental condition and a Phase II was done showing impacts from the historic use. The Mortgaged Property is expected to be remediated by the borrower under supervision of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in the Voluntary Cleanup Program to obtain regulatory closure. Additionally, the borrower obtained an environmental impairment liability (“EIL”) insurance policy, from Beazley (Lloyd’s of London Syndicates 623/2623) (rated “A” by A.M. Best), which lists the borrower as the first named insured and the lender, with its successors, assigns, and/or affiliates as additional named insured. The EIL policy has a term of 121 months, with an optional extended reporting period of 36 months, policy limits of $2,000,000 per incident and in the aggregate, with a $100,000 deductible per incident. The premium for the policy was paid at loan origination. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrower provided an environmental insurance policy issued by Great American Insurance Group, which has an A.M. Best rating of “A+”, with limits of $10,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy provides coverage during the term of the Mortgage Loan. The related ESA did not note any RECs. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as University Properties Portfolio, representing approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the ESA reported that the Mortgaged Property is located in EPA designated Radon Zone 1, in which the average predicted radon concentration levels are expected to be at or above the EPA residential action level of 4.0 pCi/L. Several rounds of radon testing were conducted on the ground floor units of each of the buildings on the Mortgaged Property, and samples collected from 73 of those units indicated radon concentrations above 4.0 pCi/L. Based on the testing results and the recommendation in the ESA, the installation and activation of a radon mitigation system was required in each building located on the Mortgaged Property in which elevated concentrations of radon was identified in the ESA. At loan origination, the lender reserved $451,250, which equals 125% of the estimated cost of such mitigation system. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured in part by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Jo-Ann |
189
– Freeport, IL, representing approximately 0.1% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the related ESA identified a controlled recognized environmental condition (“CREC”) at the Mortgaged Property in connection with the presence of a dry cleaner that operated on a site adjacent to the Mortgaged Property. An unaffiliated third party was identified as the responsible party. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued a no further remediation letter with respect to the Mortgaged Property in 2011. Institutional controls put in place in connection with the CREC remain in place at the Mortgaged Property, which require that potable water be obtained from city supplies rather than a groundwater well at the Mortgaged Property. No further action is required. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as GNL Industrial Portfolio, representing approximately 3.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the GNL Industrial Portfolio – 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property is identified on multiple environmental regulatory databases. Such Mortgaged Property has been occupied by a commercial or light industrial facility since development in 1969. Historical releases have resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the related Mortgaged Property. These releases led to identified concentrations above regulatory action levels. A “no further action” letter and a “covenant not to sue” have been issued for the facility along with deed restrictions limiting future land use to industrial and commercial activities, as well as prohibiting groundwater use or extraction from the related Mortgaged Property except for the purposes of sampling or remedial activities. The related borrower covenanted to comply with the foregoing. Based upon the current regulatory status of the identified releases, this condition is considered a controlled recognized environmental condition at the related Mortgaged Property. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the ESA reports related to the Mortgaged Properties identified as Butner and Lawrenceville each concluded that the presence of an underground storage tank (each a “UST”) installed in 1996 was a REC. These findings were each based on the potential for overfills, spills and releases during the life of the USTs, and professional judgments that USTs are increasingly likely to release petroleum products as they age. A Phase II investigation to sample and analyze soil and groundwater in the vicinity of each UST was conducted for each related Mortgaged Property. The Phase II reports provided for the Butner and Lawrenceville Mortgaged Properties recommended that the borrower conduct further sampling and testing due to the environmental consulting firm’s inability to obtain data believed necessary for reaching a conclusion with respect to the presence or absence of releases. At origination, the borrower reserved approximately 125% of the estimated costs for further investigation and the potential decommissioning of the USTs. In the event that such funds are insufficient, the Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to provide additional funds in an amount that results in the total funds reserved equaling approximately 125% of the estimated cost to complete any required remediation. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Harford Village MHC, representing approximately 2.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA identified four (4) incidents where petroleum was released from above ground storage tanks that remain open at the related Mortgaged Property. The open cases are considered a REC for the related Mortgaged Property. The ESA recommended that the soil in the areas affected by |
190
the releases be tested and any contaminated soil be removed. The sum of $58,764, representing approximately 118% of the $50,000 estimated cost of testing and remediation, was escrowed at origination of the subject Mortgage Loan. The related title company holds the reserve for the completion of environmental testing and remediation, and the related escrow agreement was collaterally assigned to the lender. The related borrower cannot make a draw under the environmental escrow without the lender’s prior determination that the borrower has complied with the related environmental provisions in the related loan agreement. The related loan agreement requires the related borrower to conduct testing, sampling and any remediation required by an environmental consultant acceptable to the lender to address such releases. The related borrower is also required to seek a “no further requirements determination” and obtain a “closure” status from the Maryland Department of the Environment (“MDEP”) for each release or, if the MDEP declines to do so or will not issue such letter, written confirmation from the approved environmental consultant that the release has been investigated and that no further action is required under environmental law or governmental authority or is otherwise reasonably necessary to protect human health, safety or the environment. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as 4851 South Alameda Street, representing approximately 1.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the ESA recommended a Phase II subsurface investigation to determine whether historical industrial uses including spray painting, documented use of chlorinated solvents, and the presence of sump pumps and abandoned septic tanks have adversely impacted the subsurface. The ESA determined that such historical uses constitute a REC. In lieu of completion of a Phase II, the borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy (for which the lender is the named insured) from Great American Insurance Group with limits of $3,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate. The policy has a 13 year term, a $25,000 deductible and the premium was paid in full at origination. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Quakertown Shopping Center, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the ESA identified a REC associated with the use of an adjacent, non-collateral property as a gas station. The adjacent property is an open LUST site due to a release of gasoline to the groundwater reported on March 31, 2017. According to the applicable regulatory database, remedial actions have been initiated and Wawa is listed as the responsible party. The borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy (for which the lender is the named insured) from Zurich (Steadfast Insurance Company) with limits of $2,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate. The policy has a 13 year term and a $25,000 deductible and the premium was paid in full at origination. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tarzana Village, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA identified a REC at the Mortgaged Property in connection with the former presence of an onsite dry cleaning facility at the Mortgaged Property, which operated from 1988 through 2016. A 55-gallon steel drum containing hazardous wastes was also found at the former site of the dry cleaning facility at the Mortgaged Property. No leaks or spills were observed in connection with the steel drum, nor were any leaks or releases identified in the vicinity of the drum. In lieu of a Phase II investigation, the borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy from Zurich Group Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per |
191
occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate, subject to a $25,000 deductible for a term extending three years beyond the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan. |
Redevelopment, Renovation and Expansion
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are properties which are currently undergoing or are expected to undergo redevelopment, renovation or expansion, including with respect to hotel properties, pursuant to property improvement plans (“PIPs”) required by the franchisors. For example:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as El Dorado Tech Center, representing approximately 2.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower deposited approximately $9.29 million into various reserves, intended to cover the remaining tenant improvements and HVAC work owed to the related sole tenant at the related Mortgaged Property. The related Mortgaged Property is currently undergoing, among other things, a buildout and remodeling of its interior, improvements to its exterior, landscaping and parking lots, and roof and HVAC work. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Offices at Sam Houston, representing approximately 2.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, Caterpillar, Inc., representing approximately 88.9% of the net rentable area, is in the process of building out an expansion space of 27,728 SF at the Mortgaged Property. The second largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., representing approximately 11.1% of the net rentable area, is in the process of building out and relocating its space at the Mortgaged Property. Each tenant is expected to complete and take occupancy of its respective spaces in April 2018. At loan origination, the lender reserved $2,907,270 for outstanding Caterpillar, Inc. tenant improvement costs and $473,076 for outstanding IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. tenant improvement costs. Also at loan origination, the lender reserved (i) $143,665 for Caterpillar, Inc. rent, to be released to borrower upon Caterpillar, Inc. being in occupancy of the expansion space and paying full, unabated rent for its entire space, and (ii) $82,088 for IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. rent, to be released to borrower upon IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. being in occupancy of its new space and paying full, unabated rent for its space. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Comfort Inn Mortgaged Property is subject to a PIP, which includes upgrades to guest rooms. The renovations are expected to be completed by 2023. At origination, the borrower reserved approximately $395,500, which represents approximately (i) 115% of the estimated costs due within two years and (ii) 100% of the estimated costs due in five years. |
We cannot assure you that any of these redevelopments, renovations or expansions will be completed, that any amounts reserved in connection therewith will be sufficient to complete any such redevelopment, renovation or expansion or that the failure to do so will not have a material adverse impact on the related Mortgaged Properties. Additionally, other Mortgaged Properties may, and likely do, have property improvement or renovation plans in various stages of completion or planning.
192
Certain risks related to redevelopment, renovation and expansion at a Mortgaged Property are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties”.
Assessment of Property Value and Condition
In connection with the origination or acquisition of each Mortgage Loan or otherwise in connection with this offering, an appraisal was conducted in respect of the related Mortgaged Property by an independent appraiser that was state certified and/or a member of the Appraisal Institute or an update of an existing appraisal was obtained. In each case, the appraisal complied, or the appraiser certified that it complied, with the real estate appraisal regulations issued jointly by the federal bank regulatory agencies under FIRREA. In general, those appraisals represent the analysis and opinion of the person performing the appraisal and are not guarantees of, and may not be indicative of, present or future value. We cannot assure you that another person would not have arrived at a different valuation, even if such person used the same general approach to and same method of valuing the property or that different valuations would not have been reached separately by the mortgage loan sellers based on their internal review of such appraisals. The appraisals obtained as described above sought to establish the amount a typically motivated buyer would pay a typically motivated seller. Such amount could be significantly higher than the amount obtained from the sale of a Mortgaged Property under a distress or liquidation sale.
In addition, in general, a licensed engineer, architect or consultant inspected the related Mortgaged Property, in connection with the origination or acquisition of each of the Mortgage Loans or otherwise in connection with this offering, to assess the condition of the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and mechanical and electrical systems. Engineering reports by licensed engineers, architects or consultants generally were prepared, except for newly constructed properties, certain manufactured housing community properties and properties for which the borrower’s interest consists of a fee interest solely on the land and not any improvements, for the Mortgaged Properties in connection with the origination of the related Mortgage Loan or in connection with this offering. None of these engineering reports are more than 13 months old as of the Cut-off Date. In certain cases where material deficiencies were noted in such reports, the related borrower was required to establish reserves for replacement or repair or remediate the deficiency.
See Annex A-1 and the footnotes related thereto and the definition of “LTV Ratio” for additional information.
Litigation and Other Considerations
There may be material pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or other past or present material criminal or material adverse regulatory circumstances experienced by, the borrowers, their sponsors and managers of the Mortgaged Properties and their respective affiliates. In addition, the Mortgaged Properties may be subject to ongoing litigation. For example:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 5.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the owner of 99.99% of the interests in the borrower sponsor, American Finance Trust, Inc. (“AFIN”), and American Realty Capital – Retail Centers of America, Inc. (“RCA”), among others, are named defendants in a stockholder derivative action that was filed on January 13, 2017 related to the merger of AFIN and RCA. AFIN and RCA are under the common control of AR |
193
Global Investments, LLC (“AR Global”), which is also a named defendant. The plaintiffs are owners of common stock in RCA. The merger of AFIN and RCA was consummated on February 16, 2017. On June 19, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that alleges, among other allegations, that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 11, 12(a), 13(e) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 14a-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing a proxy statement and prospectus containing false and misleading statements intending to induce stockholder approval of a proposed merger between AFIN and RCA. The plaintiffs seek rescission of the merger and unspecified damages that resulted from the alleged acts and transactions. The case is before the United States District Court for the District of Maryland and is currently in the pre-trial motion stage. The most recent activity in such case was a reply in response to a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, filed on November 17, 2017. In addition, affiliates of AFIN and AR Global have been named in several individual and class action securities fraud suits and investigations, including an ongoing SEC and FBI investigation of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. (“ARCP”), which is under common control with the related borrower, relating to allegedly falsifying financial information included in public filings with the SEC. On June 29, 2016, ARCP’s chief accounting officer pled guilty to making misleading statements and material misrepresentations related to such filings made in 2014. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as City Square and Clay Street, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, a tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, Active Acquisition Partners, LLC (“Active”), is currently in litigation in the Superior Court of the State of California with one of the related borrowers (“STG”) and the related guarantor, regarding common area maintenance (“CAM”) payments. Active asserted claims for fraud, breach of contract, declaratory relief, and unfair business practices, asserting that STG was improperly characterizing certain capital and other expenses as CAM charges, and seeking to recover a percentage of these amounts from Active. Active also sought a preliminary injunction to prevent STG from assessing any CAM charges relating to certain plumbing work, as STG sought to collect $354,939 from Active. The request for a preliminary injunction was denied on December 8, 2016. On October 26, 2017, the court granted Active’s motion to compel STG to produce documents and a privilege log and sanctioned STG $5,250 (allowed attorneys’ fees for Active’s counsel). At origination of the subject Mortgage Loan, $300,000 was reserved to cover any potential monetary judgment against STG or any settlement entered into by Active and STG. In the event that $300,000 does not cover any judgment against STG, cash flow from the related Mortgaged Property will be swept into a lender-controlled lockbox until the judgment is satisfied. If the judgment is in favor of STG, any amounts in the litigation reserve will be released to the related borrowers. |
In addition, the related guarantor under the City Square and Clay Street Mortgage Loan has been audited recently by the Internal Revenue Service based on actions surrounding a 1031 exchange in 2012. The audit involves a proposed disallowance of a rental real estate loss from an S corporation in which the related guarantor owned a 50% interest in 2012. The maximum exposure is estimated to be less than $1 million.
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 to this prospectus as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased |
194
Portfolio, representing approximately 3.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, Nicholas S. Schorsch is a key principal of AR Global Investments, LLC (formerly known as AR Capital, LLC) and is affiliated with the related borrower sponsor, AFIN. Mr. Schorsch resigned from the boards of 13 companies following a disclosure that, during his time as chairman of ARCP, an affiliate of AR Capital, LLC until January 2014, accounting errors were intentionally concealed and improper payments and equity awards were made to certain affiliates and key principals, respectively. In October 2014, ARCP issued a press release announcing that, based on the preliminary findings of ARCP’s audit committee, previously issued financial statements and other financial information contained in ARCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal periods ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014 had accounting errors that were intentionally concealed. The audit committee also identified certain payments made to several affiliates that were not appropriately documented, and that equity awards made to Mr. Schorsch and another former executive contained provisions that were more favorable than those approved by the compensation committee of ARCP’s board of directors. In connection with such findings, ARCP has been the subject of various regulatory and criminal investigations, including by the SEC, the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York (the “USAO-SDNY”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which may still be ongoing. Several officers and directors of ARCP, including the key principal of the borrower sponsor, have also been named as defendants in various securities class action complaints and in October 2015, an additional securities fraud action was filed by The Vanguard Funds against ARCP, Mr. Schorsch, and other principals of ARCP. In addition, the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Securities Division filed suit against Realty Capital Securities, LLC (“RCS”), an affiliate of ARCP under common control of ARCP’s parent company, in connection with the fraudulent casting of shareholder proxy votes on various investment programs. In December 2015, RCS announced that it had settled with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Securities Division, which settlement includes the payment of a fine, revocation of RCS’s broker-dealer registration and the dissolution of RCS’s wholesale distribution business. In March 2016, RCS filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In September 2016, the USAO-SDNY announced the filing of criminal charges and the SEC announced the filing of a civil complaint against the former chief financial officer and former chief accounting officer of ARCP. The chief financial officer pled guilty to the charges, and the SEC litigation has been stayed pending the conclusion of the criminal action. AFIN merged with RCA in February 2017. On January 13, 2017, four affiliated stockholders of RCA filed a class action lawsuit against AFIN, its leadership team and AR Global, which sought for the rescission of the merger transaction, together with unspecified damages. An amended complaint was filed on June 19, 2017, which dropped the demand for rescission of the merger, and named additional individuals and entities as defendants. Due to the early stage of the litigation, no estimate of a probable loss can be determined at this time. No provisions for such losses have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as GNL Industrial Portfolio, representing approximately 3.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, Nicholas Schorsch holds an indirect majority ownership interest in the entity that is the external advisor (such entity, the “Advisor”) to Global Net Lease, Inc., the 99.99% general partner of the related |
195
borrower sponsor. In addition, one of the entities through which Mr. Schorsch holds his indirect equity interest in the Advisor holds a 0.01% interest in the related borrower sponsor. The related borrower sponsor, in turn, holds a 100% interest in each of the related borrowers. The Advisor (and certain affiliates and principals thereof) are subject to a pending case in the Chancery Court in New Castle County, Delaware for breach of fiduciary duty filed by RCS Creditor Trust, as plaintiff, against Global Net Lease Advisors, LLC, American Finance Advisors, American Realty Capital Retail Advisor LLC, et al., as defendant. The complaint alleges that Nicholas Schorsch and his colleagues schemed to exploit their de facto control of a public company, RCS Capital Corporation (“RCAP”), to enrich their wholly owned fund management business called AR Capital, to the detriment of RCAP and its stakeholders. The matter is pending. In addition, Mr. Schorsch and/or companies with which he was associated, including American Realty Capital Properties Inc., have been the subject of various regulatory investigations and named as defendants in certain securities class action complaints, including in connection with certain alleged financial statement errors. The Advisor is affiliated with the external advisor(s) to the direct or an indirect parent of the borrowers under the Mortgage Loans secured by the portfolios of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio and AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as 4851 South Alameda Street, representing approximately 1.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, in connection with litigation between the borrower and a current tenant that has settled, the tenant alleged that a portion of the Mortgaged Property was being used for the cultivation of marijuana. The related mortgage loan seller inspected the entirety of the Mortgaged Property and found no such operation to exist, and the borrower has represented that the Mortgaged Property (including any use thereof) complies in all material respects with all applicable legal requirements. The Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to operate the Mortgaged Property in compliance with all applicable laws. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower is subject to three pending litigations related to prior tenants seeking judicial declaration of apartment units as subject to rent stabilization law and monetary damages for rent overcharges at the Mortgaged Property. We cannot assure you as to the manner in which these or other similar proceedings will impact the number of rent stabilized units the borrower can convert to market rate units in the future. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks”. In addition, the borrower sponsor is subject to three pending suits filed against him by a former business partner for breach of contractual duties under LLC agreements unrelated to the Mortgaged Property. The suits seek a minimum of $5 million on behalf of the former business partner and $5 million derivatively on behalf of the allegedly damaged entities. The second suit filed by the same plaintiff alleged that the borrower sponsor abused control relating to unrelated properties in which the former business partner has a minority ownership interest. The suit seeks a minimum of $15 million. The borrower sponsor filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff for amounts exceeding $63 million. The third suit filed by the same plaintiff seeks judicial liquidation of several entities unrelated to the Mortgaged Property. All three matters are still pending. |
196
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Eight Points Shopping Center, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrower sponsor is one of several defendants under complaints filed in April 2016 by the City of St. Louis, the County of St. Louis and the Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority related to the decision to relocate St. Louis Rams to Los Angeles. Allegations include, among other things, (i) breach of contract, (ii) unjust enrichment, (iii) fraudulent misrepresentation, and (iv) tortious interference with business expectations. The plaintiffs seek damages and restitution of profits. An arbitration motion is pending in the case. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – Saint John’s Mortgaged Property was previously subject to New York City rent stabilization laws, but currently, all of the units at such Mortgaged Property are occupied by market rate tenants. A tenant at such Mortgaged Property filed an overcharge complaint with the New York City Department of Housing and Community Renewal (the “DHCR”) claiming that its unit was rent stabilized and that it was being charged excessive rent on the basis of missing DHCR registrations and lease typos. The disputed unit has had several tenant turnovers, which is the basis on which the related borrower argues it was permissible to increase the rent legally beyond the rent stabilization threshold. The case is pending and is anticipated to be adjudicated by the DHCR by the end of April 2018. At origination of the Mortgage Loan, the lender deposited $150,000 into a litigation reserve, which amount is above the maximum potential overcharge damages for that unit. Such funds will not be released unless the overcharge claim is discharged beyond appeal or to pay any settlement or judgment amounts. We cannot assure you as to the manner in which these or other similar proceedings will impact the market rent units at the related Mortgaged Property in the future. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Multifamily Properties Have Special Risks”. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions”. See also “—Loan Purpose; Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” below and representation and warranty no. 13 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
Loan Purpose
● | Thirty-six (36) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 49.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated in connection with the borrower’s refinancing of a previous mortgage loan. |
● | Twenty-nine (29) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 40.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated in connection with the borrower’s acquisition of the related Mortgaged Property. |
● | Two (2) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated in connection with the borrower’s recapitalization of the related Mortgaged Property. |
197
Modified and Refinanced Loans
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Properties were previously encumbered by a mortgage loan that was transferred to special servicing for imminent default and later modified. The four Mortgaged Properties were part of a portfolio of 57 properties that were all master-leased to a single tenant, BlueLinx Corporation, and the related mortgage loan was securitized in the Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-C27 and Bank of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-4 transactions. Around 2008, BlueLinx Corporation was experiencing financial difficulties and the previous loan was transferred to special servicing for imminent default on June 10, 2011. The previous loan was modified in July 2011 to facilitate a $60,000,000 equity raise and was further modified in March 2016 to extend the maturity date, subject to the condition that the borrower under the previous loan met annual principal pay down requirements. The borrower under such previous loan remained current on payments until the Mortgaged Properties were acquired out of special servicing in January 2018. The proceeds from the acquisition paid off the prior loan in full.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as South Bend Medical Office, representing approximately 1.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrower sponsor acquired the Mortgaged Properties out of foreclosure in 2018 with proceeds of the Mortgage Loan. The two Mortgaged Properties, previously owned by a party unaffiliated with the current borrowers, were part of a CMBS loan originated in October 2006 secured by a portfolio of seven mortgaged properties. The previous loan was transferred to special servicing on May 2, 2016 due to imminent default and entered maturity default on October 8, 2016, when the prior owner of the mortgaged properties was unable to obtain refinancing. The borrower sponsor did not acquire the other five properties that secured the defaulted CMBS loan. Under the previous loan, the two Mortgaged Properties had an aggregate allocated loan amount of approximately $16.8 million and the purchase price for the two Mortgaged Properties was approximately $17.8 million.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as 100 Fairfield, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property was previously encumbered by a prior loan that went into maturity default in November 2017. The Mortgage Loan paid off the prior loan in full.
Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings
Certain of the borrowers, principals of the borrowers and other entities under the control of such principals or single tenants at the related Mortgaged Properties or in certain cases a Mortgaged Property that secures a Mortgage Loan are, or previously have been, parties to bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions and/or mortgage loan workouts resulting from mortgage loan defaults, which in some cases involved a Mortgaged Property that secures a Mortgage Loan to be included in the Trust. For example:
● | With respect to ten (10) Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, BlueLinx Portfolio, Harford Village MHC, Braemar Office Park, South Bend Medical Office, Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, 10 Park Place South, Kohl’s - Jensen Beach and Birches at Countryside, representing in the aggregate approximately 21.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, (a) within |
198
approximately the last 10 years, related borrowers, sponsors and/or key principals (or affiliates thereof) have previously (i) sponsored, been a key principal with respect to, or been a payment or non-recourse carveout guarantor on mortgage loans secured by, real estate projects (including in some such cases, the particular Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties referenced above in this sentence) that became the subject of foreclosure proceedings or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings or directly or indirectly secured a real estate loan or a real estate related mezzanine loan that was the subject of a discounted payoff or modification, or (ii) been the subject of personal bankruptcy proceedings, (b) the related Mortgage Loan refinanced a prior loan secured by, or a mezzanine loan secured by interests in the owner of, the Mortgaged Property which prior loan was the subject of a maturity default, a maturity extension or a discounted payoff, short sale or other restructuring, (c) the Mortgaged Property was acquired by the related borrower or an affiliate thereof from a foreclosing lender or through foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, as part of an REO transaction, at a foreclosure sale or out of receivership, or (d) the Mortgaged Property has been or currently is involved in a borrower, principal or tenant bankruptcy. |
In particular, with respect to the 15 largest Mortgage Loans we note the following:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrower sponsors have been involved in (i) several deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure between 2010 and 2017 and (ii) discounted payoffs of prior loans between 2010 and 2012. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as City Square and Clay Street, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, companies in which the related borrower sponsor held direct or indirect interests owned three office properties that were the subjects of foreclosures or, in one such case, a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure in 2010 and 2011. In addition, an affiliate of the related borrower acquired the Clay Street portion of the related Mortgaged Property in connection with a foreclosure sale in July 1997. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the guarantors have been involved in four foreclosures and two discounted pay-offs that resulted, in part, from the economic downturn. One guarantor, Scott McKibben, is currently the guarantor on a $12,500,000 loan, the proceeds of which were used to acquire a portfolio of four properties in 2008. The loan was modified to allow for the release of two individual properties. The loan was recently further modified to allow for the release of a third property. A new loan was entered into for the remaining balance of approximately $4,700,000 and the proceeds were used to pay-off the prior loan. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Harford Village MHC, representing approximately 2.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower sponsor was the key principal of an entity that indirectly owned three apartment community properties that underwent deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions in January 2003, January 2006 and August 2006, respectively. In each case, the related borrower sponsor acted as the guarantor under the related loan and was released from his guarantor liabilities once the deed-in-lieu of foreclosure was completed. |
199
Certain risks relating to bankruptcy proceedings are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans” and “—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Tenant Issues
Tenant Concentrations
The Mortgaged Properties have tenant concentrations as set forth below:
● | Forty-eight (48) of the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, identified on Annex A-1 as Houston Distribution Center, Park Place at Florham Park – 230 Park Place, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Rolla, MO, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Chili’s – Machesney Park, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Brainerd, MN, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Casper, WY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Chili’s – McHenry, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Sulphur, LA, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Sonic – Tuscaloosa, AL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Columbia, SC, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Jacksonville, FL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Elko, NV, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Jo-Ann – Freeport, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Tractor Supply – Hazen, ND, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Kingston, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Sonic – Robertsdale, AL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Tractor Supply – Flandreau, SD, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Farmington, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Otego, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Kerhonkson, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Dewitt, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Utica, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Parish, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Geddes, NY, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 46643 Ryan Court, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 10088 South 136th Street, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 350 International Drive, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 210 Pierce Road, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 815 Industrial Parkway, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 11495 Deerfield Road, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 12 Mechanic Street, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 911 Industrial Parkway, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Frederick, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Bellingham, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Lawrenceville, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Butner, El Dorado Tech Center, 1990 NASA Boulevard, South Bend Medical Office – Allied Physicians Surgery Center, South Bend Medical Office – South Bend Orthopedic Associates, Kohl’s - Jensen Beach, Kohl’s Neenah, Walgreens - Harlingen, TX, Walgreens - Dallas, GA, Walgreens – Guthrie, OK, Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, representing in the aggregate approximately 23.1% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are each leased entirely (or substantially in its entirety) to a single tenant. See Annex A-1. |
● | Fourteen (14) Mortgaged Properties, identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio – Riverbend Marketplace, Park Place at Florham Park – 220 Park Place, The Offices at |
200
Sam Houston, Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion, The Village at La Orilla, Chicago Industrial Portfolio – 8811 S. 77th Avenue, Chicago Industrial Portfolio – 7400 W. 100th Place, Fortuna Center Plaza, Quakertown Shopping Center, Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – Dekalb, National NNN Retail Portfolio – Bradley Retail, National NNN Retail Portfolio – Durham Retail, 100 Fairfield and Plaza Point Shopping Center, representing in the aggregate approximately 10.9% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are leased to multiple tenants; however, one such tenant occupies 50% or more of the NRA of each such Mortgaged Property. |
See “—Lease Expirations and Terminations” below, “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks of Commercial and Multifamily Lending Generally”, “—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—A Tenant Concentration May Result in Increased Losses” and “—Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses”. See also “—Affiliated Leases” below.
Lease Expirations and Terminations
Expirations
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to tenant leases that expire before the maturity date of the related Mortgage Loan. For tenant lease expiration information in the form of a lease rollover chart relating to each of the top 15 Mortgage Loans, see the related summaries attached as Annex A-3. In addition, see Annex A-1 for tenant lease expiration dates for the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable area leased) at each retail, office, mixed use and industrial Mortgaged Property. Whether or not any of the 5 largest tenants at a particular Mortgaged Property have leases that expire before, or shortly after, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan, there may be a significant percentage of leases at a particular Mortgaged Property that expire in a single calendar year, a rolling 12-month period or prior to, or shortly after, the maturity of a Mortgage Loan. Furthermore, some of the Mortgaged Properties have significant leases or a significant concentration of leases that expire before, or shortly following, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan. In addition, certain other Mortgaged Properties may have a significant portion of the leases that expire or can be terminated in a particular year, or portion thereof, at the related Mortgaged Property. Prospective investors are encouraged to review the tables entitled “Tenant Summary” and “Lease Rollover Schedule” for the 15 largest Mortgage Loans presented on Annex A-3, in particular those related to the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, Tryad Industrial & Business Center, CrossPoint, Houston Distribution Center, Moore Plaza, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio, GNL Industrial Portfolio and El Dorado Tech Center.
With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured, in whole or in part, by the Mortgaged Properties identified in the table below, each such Mortgaged Property is occupied by a single tenant under a lease that expires prior to, or within 12 months after, the maturity
201
date (or, in the case of an ARD Loan, the Anticipated Repayment Date) of the related Mortgage Loan.
Mortgaged Property Name | % of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount | Owner Occupied | Lease Expiration Date | Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date | ||||
Houston Distribution Center | 4.7% | No | 1/31/2027 | 2/1/2028 | ||||
Park Place at Florham Park – 230 Park Place | 1.0% | No | 6/30/2028 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Rolla, MO | 0.6% | No | 6/30/2027 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Chili’s – Machesney Park, IL | 0.2% | No | 10/31/2027 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Brainerd, MN | 0.2% | No | 5/31/2026 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Casper, WY | 0.2% | No | 6/30/2027 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Chili’s – McHenry, IL | 0.2% | No | 10/31/2027 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Jo-Ann – Freeport, IL | 0.1% | No | 1/31/2025 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Tractor Supply – Hazen, ND | 0.1% | No | 8/31/2026 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Tractor Supply – Flandreau, SD | 0.1% | No | 1/31/2027 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Utica, NY | 0.1% | No | 11/30/2028 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Parish, NY | 0.1% | No | 10/31/2028 | 1/6/2028 | ||||
GNL Industrial Portfolio – 46643 Ryan Court | 1.3% | No | 8/31/2027 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
GNL Industrial Portfolio – 10088 South 136th Street | 0.4% | No | 5/31/2025 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
GNL Industrial Portfolio – 350 International Drive | 0.4% | No | 7/31/2027 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
GNL Industrial Portfolio – 11495 Deerfield Road | 0.3% | No | 12/31/2026 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
El Dorado Tech Center | 2.4% | No | 12/31/2027 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
1990 NASA Boulevard | 1.6% | No | 10/31/2027 | 2/6/2028 | ||||
Kohl’s – Jensen Beach | 1.1% | No | 1/31/2028 | 1/6/2028 |
If a Mortgaged Property loses its sole tenant, whether upon expiration of the related lease or otherwise, the “dark value” of such property may be materially below the “as-is” value of such property or even the unpaid principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan because of the difficulties of finding a new tenant that will lease the space on comparable terms as the old tenant. Such difficulties may arise from an oversupply of comparable
202
space, high vacancy rates, low rental rates or the Mortgaged Property’s lack of suitability for most potential replacement tenants.
In addition, with respect to certain other Mortgaged Properties, there are leases that represent in the aggregate a material (greater than 25%) portion (but less than 100%) of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property that expire in a single calendar year prior to, or shortly after, the maturity (or, in the case of an ARD Loan, the Anticipated Repayment Date) of the related Mortgage Loan.
See Annex A-1 for tenant lease expiration dates for the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable area leased) at each retail, office, mixed use and industrial Mortgaged Property.
Terminations
In addition to termination options tied to certain triggers as described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Early Lease Termination Options May Reduce Cash Flow” that are common with respect to retail properties, certain tenant leases permit the related tenant to unilaterally terminate its lease at any time. For example (with respect to the largest 15 Mortgage Loans and the largest 5 tenants at each related Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, as applicable):
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, representing approximately 5.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the second largest tenant, Harris Corporation (formerly ITT Space Systems), representing 7.8% of the net rentable area, may terminate its lease with respect to approximately 20.6% of its space on or after September 1, 2018 with 180 days’ prior notice. The third largest tenant, Kodak Alaris, representing approximately 7.4% of the net rentable area, is permitted to terminate its lease on or after December 31, 2025 with one year’s prior written notice to the borrower. The fourth largest tenant, Maximus, representing 5.8% of the net rentable area, may terminate its lease with 90 days’ prior written notice to the borrower if its contract with the State of New York has been terminated, materially altered or permitted to expire. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the second largest tenant, Verizon New England, representing approximately 23.9% of the net rentable area, is permitted to terminate up to approximately 69.7% of its space effective December 31, 2020, and to terminate the remaining approximately 29.3% of its space effective May 31, 2021, by giving notice not later than December 31, 2019. The fifth largest tenant, the United States of America (GSA) - IRS, representing approximately 2.8% of the net rentable area, has the right to terminate its lease at any time after June 1, 2021, upon 180 days’ notice. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the fifth largest tenant, Santander Bank, N.A., representing approximately 8.6% of the net rentable area, may terminate its lease on November 1, 2024 with one year’s written notice to the borrower and payment of a termination fee equal to $1,123,188. |
203
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Offices at Sam Houston, representing approximately 2.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Caterpillar, Inc., representing approximately 88.9% of the net rentable area, is permitted to reduce its leased space by up to one full floor (limited to contiguous areas on any one floor leased solely to Caterpillar, Inc.) on September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2026 by providing twelve (12) months prior written notice and paying unamortized costs to the related borrower. Unamortized costs are to be approximately (i) $46.85 PSF, as of September 30, 2024 and (ii) $32.14 PSF, as of September 30, 2026. Caterpillar, Inc. may not reduce its leased premises by more than one full floor in the aggregate. |
Set forth below are certain leases that individually are among the top 5 tenants at the related Mortgaged Property and have termination options associated with appropriation rights.
Mortgaged Property Name | Percent of Initial Pool Balance | Tenant | Percent of Net Rentable Area | Percent of Underwritten Base Rent | ||||
Braemar Office Park | 2.1% | Federal Air Marshall Service(1) | 9.2% | 9.3% | ||||
Fortuna Center Plaza | 1.3% | Virginia ABC Store | 2.8% | 5.9% | ||||
10 Park Place South | 1.2% | Fulton County(2) | 34.7% | 38.4% | ||||
100 Fairfield | 0.4% | Department of Children and Families | 51.9% | 60.2% |
(1) | The related lease provides that the term is contingent upon the tenant continuing to receive adequate appropriations from the government from year to year for the payment of rent. In the event the tenant does not receive governmental appropriations, the tenant may terminate upon 120 days’ written notice to the landlord, and the reimbursement of any unamortized leasehold investments. |
(2) | The related lease renews automatically for up to eleven (11) additional consecutive one-year terms unless all of the following termination events occur: (i) the related tenant’s Board of Commissioners fails to appropriate funds under the related lease agreement; (ii) the related tenant provides the related borrower written notice that it intends to terminate the related lease agreement by August 31 of such year; and (iii) the related tenant pays a termination fee to the related borrower in good funds within 60 days of written notice to cancel the related lease. |
For more information related to tenant termination options held by the 5 largest tenants (by net rentable area leased), see Annex A-1 and the accompanying footnotes, as well as the charts titled “Tenant Summary” and “Lease Rollover Schedule” for certain tenants at the 15 largest Mortgage Loans presented on Annex A-3, in particular those related to the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, CrossPoint, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, GNL Industrial Portfolio, El Dorado Tech Center and The Offices at Sam Houston.
Other
Tenants under certain leases included in the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, Underwritten NOI and/or Occupancy Rate may not be in physical occupancy, may not have begun paying rent or may be in negotiation. In particular, certain of the Mortgaged Properties have, among the 5 largest tenants at such Mortgaged Property (by net rentable area leased), tenants that have renewed leases or have taken possession of the space demised under the related lease with the related borrower, but have not yet commenced payments of rent or are in a rent abatement period under the related lease, or have tenants that have executed leases, but have not taken possession or commenced payment of rent, have tenants that are in a buildout phase and have not taken occupancy, have tenants that are expanding their space but have not commenced payment of the additional rent, have tenants that
204
renewed leases that provide free rent and have not commenced payment of rent, have tenants that are entitled to free rent periods or rent abatement in the future, or have subleases in place that can increase vacancy risks. In certain circumstances, an escrow reserve related to free rent periods and tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions due in connection with such leases was funded at closing. Generally such tenants were underwritten as if they were in occupancy and paying full contractual rent. In addition, certain tenants’ rent may have been underwritten on a straight-lined basis. See Annex A-1 and the accompanying footnotes for additional information and Annex A-3 regarding additional information for the 15 largest Mortgage Loans.
For example, with respect to single tenant properties or tenants that are one of the top 5 tenants (by net rentable area leased) for the 15 largest Mortgage Loans, certain of such tenants have not taken possession or commenced paying rent or have rent underwritten on a straight-lined basis as set forth below:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 5.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the second largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property identified as Jefferson Commons, Aldi, representing approximately 11.7% of the net rentable area, has executed a lease and is currently in a free rent period. Such tenant is expected to take full occupancy of its space on February 12, 2018 and to commence rent payments on July 4, 2018. At origination, the borrower reserved approximately $166,062 in connection with such tenant’s rent. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, representing approximately 5.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the third largest tenant, Kodak Alaris, representing approximately 7.4% of the net rentable area, executed a lease in July 2017. Such tenant is currently building out its space and is in a free rent period until September 2018. Such tenant is expected to take occupancy of a portion of its space in March 2018 and of the remainder in May 2018. At origination, the borrower reserved approximately $8,729,407 in connection with the buildout of such tenant’s space and approximately $1,917,974 in connection with free rent. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Kronos Incorporated, representing approximately 38.3% of the net rentable area, executed a lease in May 2016. The tenant is currently building out its space and in a free rent period through February 2019. At origination, the borrower reserved $6,500,000 in connection with Kronos Incorporated’s free rent. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the fifth largest tenant, the United States of America (GSA) - IRS, representing approximately 2.8% of the net rentable area, leases its space under a GSA lease that is subject to novation. The lease is currently in the name of the previous owner, which has assigned its rights as landlord to the borrower. A novation has been submitted for GSA approval. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the second largest tenant, RBC Capital Markets LLC, representing approximately 14.9% of the net rentable area, executed a lease |
205
in August 2017 and is in a free rent period until July 31, 2018. At origination, the borrower reserved $843,942 for the tenant’s free rent. In addition, the fourth largest tenant, Level 3 Communication, LLC, representing approximately 9.9% of the net rentable area, subleases the entirety of its space at the 200 Park Avenue Mortgaged Property to Armada Healthcare LLC. Level 3 Communication, LLC is responsible for its rental obligations through its lease expiration in March 2020. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as City Square and Clay Street, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the third largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, is not expected to take full occupancy of its leased space until March 1, 2018 and is expected to begin paying rent on October 1, 2018. At origination, the related borrowers reserved $570,898 in respect of free rent for such tenant. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Offices at Sam Houston, representing approximately 2.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, Caterpillar, Inc., representing approximately 88.9% of the net rentable area, is in the process of building out an expansion space of 27,728 SF at the Mortgaged Property. Caterpiller, Inc. is in a free rent period and is required to commence paying full rent for its expansion space on March 1, 2018. The underwritten base rent for Caterpiller, Inc. was based on the average rent paid for its leased space (including the new expansion space) over the term of the Mortgage Loan. The second largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., representing approximately 11.1% of the net rentable area, is in the process of building out and relocating its space at the Mortgaged Property. IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. is in a free rent period and is required to commence paying full rent on April 22, 2018. Each tenant is expected to complete its respective buildout and take occupancy of its respective spaces in April 2018. At loan origination, the lender reserved (i) $143,665 for Caterpillar, Inc. rent, to be released to the borrower upon Caterpillar, Inc. being in occupancy of the expansion space and paying full, unabated rent for its entire space and (ii) $82,088 for IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. rent, to be released to the borrower upon IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. being in occupancy of its new space and paying full, unabated rent for its space. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based On Incorrect or Flawed Assumptions”. See Annex A-3 for more information on other tenant matters relating to the largest 15 Mortgage Loans.
Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal
Below are certain purchase options and rights of first refusal to purchase all or a portion of the Mortgaged Property with respect to certain of the Mortgaged Properties.
● | With respect to sixteen (16) of the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, Houston Distribution Center, Residence Inn Irvine, GNL Industrial Portfolio - 10088 South 136th Street, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Frederick, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Bellingham, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Lawrenceville, BlueLinx Portfolio – BlueLinx Butner, Quakertown Shopping Center, Kohl’s - Jensen Beach, Holiday Inn Express Trinity, Kohl’s Neenah, School Street Crossing, Walgreens - Harlingen, TX, Walgreens - Dallas, GA and Walgreens – Guthrie, OK, collectively representing approximately 20.8% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, each such Mortgaged Property is subject to a |
206
purchase option, right of first refusal or right of first offer to purchase such Mortgaged Property, a portion thereof or a related pad site; such rights are held by either a tenant at the related property, a prior owner of the related property, a tenant at a neighboring property, a hotel franchisor, a licensee, a homeowner’s association, another unit owner of the related condominium, a neighboring property owner, a lender or another third party. See “Yield and Maturity Considerations”. See also representation and warranty nos. 5 and 6 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1). |
In addition, with respect to the 15 largest Mortgage Loans presented on Annex A-3, we note the following:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified as Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Kronos Incorporated, has a right of first offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property so long as (i) Kronos Incorporated (or any permitted transferee) is still a tenant at the Mortgaged Property, (ii) Kronos Incorporated has not (a) sublet more than 25% of its premises or (b) assigned its lease to a party with a lower net worth than Kronos Incorporated and (iii) there is no material default under the lease. The lender will be required to deliver to Kronos Incorporated a Purchase and Sale Agreement detailing the terms of the proposed sale, and Kronos Incorporated will have 60 days to provide notice of its acceptance along with a deposit of $7,500,000. If Kronos Incorporated fails to deliver notice within 60 days, it will lose the right of first offer. Kronos Incorporated entered into a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement with the lender, under which Kronos Incorporated agreed that its right of first offer does not apply to a sale pursuant to an exercise of a power of sale, foreclosure, delivery of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or any subsequent sale of the Mortgaged Property. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Houston Distribution Center, representing 4.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the single tenant has a right of first refusal in the event that the borrower accepts a bona fide offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property. The right of first refusal is subordinated to the Mortgage Loan and does not apply to foreclosure or deed-in-lieu thereof. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as GNL Industrial Portfolio, representing approximately 3.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related sole tenant at the GNL Industrial Portfolio – 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property has a right of first refusal to purchase the related Mortgaged Property on the terms set forth in a bona fide written offer received by the related borrower from any third party. Such right of first refusal does not apply to a foreclosure or similar sale of the related Mortgaged Property by any holder of a mortgage on the related Mortgaged Property or to the granting of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure to such holder and will not apply to the subsequent sale of the related Mortgaged Property by a purchaser of the related Mortgaged Property at a foreclosure or a similar sale or by the grantee of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified as Annex A-1 as Residence Inn Irvine, representing approximately 3.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the property manager, Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC, has a right of first offer in the event that the borrower chooses to sell the Mortgaged Property to |
207
a third party the Mortgaged Property. The right of first offer is subordinated to the Mortgage Loan and does not apply to transfers resulting from the exercise of the lender’s rights, or any transfer in lieu of the exercise of such rights by the lender. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is master leased to a master lessee to accommodate a Shari’ah compliant structure for the Mortgage Loan. The master lessee has a purchase option under the master lease that may only be exercised upon a payoff of the Mortgage Loan. The master lessee’s rights under the master lease documents are subordinate to the Mortgage Loan. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Leases That Are Not Subordinated to the Lien of the Mortgage or Do Not Contain Attornment Provisions May Have an Adverse Impact at Foreclosure”. See also representation and warranty no. 6 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
Affiliated Leases
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are leased in whole or in part by borrowers or borrower affiliates. Set forth below are examples of Mortgaged Properties or portfolios of Mortgaged Properties at which at least 20% of (i) the gross income at the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties relates to leases between the borrower and an affiliate of the borrower or (ii) the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties is leased to an affiliate of the borrower:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as 4851 South Alameda Street, representing approximately 1.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the second largest tenant, ETO Doors Corp, representing approximately 18.0% of the net rentable area and 23.1% of the underwritten base rent, is affiliated with the borrower. The related lease is guaranteed by the borrower sponsor. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as South Bend Medical Office, representing approximately 1.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrowers are 75% owned by SBO Carmichael Holdings, LLC (“South Bend Orthopedic”), a partnership of doctors that operates the sole tenant at each Mortgaged Property. The leases at each of the Mortgaged Properties are guaranteed by the president of South Bend Orthopedic. |
● | With respect to each of the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Firehouse Self Storage and East Sac Self Storage, representing approximately 1.2% and 0.6%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrowers entered into a master lease with a separate entity owned by such borrowers, as master tenant for day-to-day operation and management of the related Mortgaged Property (the “Master Tenant”). In each case, the Master Tenant is a party to the related Mortgage Loan agreement (in its capacity as Master Tenant, but not as a co-borrower), the related Mortgage (as a co-mortgagor) and the related assignment of leases and rents (as a co-assignor), and thus agreed to the same operational covenants as the related borrowers. In addition, in each case the master lease is subordinated by its terms to the related Mortgage Loan. |
208
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks”.
Insurance Considerations
The Mortgage Loans generally require that each Mortgaged Property be insured by a hazard insurance policy in an amount (subject to an approved deductible) at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan and 100% of the replacement cost of the improvements located on the related Mortgaged Property, and if applicable, that the related hazard insurance policy contain appropriate endorsements or have been issued in an amount sufficient to avoid the application of co-insurance and not permit reduction in insurance proceeds for depreciation; provided that, in the case of certain of the Mortgage Loans, the hazard insurance may be in such other amounts as was required by the related originators.
In general, the standard form of hazard insurance policy covers physical damage to, or destruction of, the improvements on the Mortgaged Property by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion, subject to the conditions and exclusions set forth in each policy. Each Mortgage Loan generally also requires the related borrower to maintain comprehensive general liability insurance against claims for personal and bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the related Mortgaged Property in an amount generally equal to at least $1,000,000. Each Mortgage Loan generally further requires the related borrower to maintain business interruption insurance in an amount not less than approximately 100% of the gross rental income from the related Mortgaged Property for not less than 12 months. In general, the Mortgage Loans (including those secured by Mortgaged Properties located in California) do not require earthquake insurance. Thirteen (13) of the Mortgaged Properties, securing Mortgage Loans collectively representing 18.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zones 3 and 4). Seismic reports were prepared with respect to these Mortgaged Properties (other than the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Las Brisas MHC, for which no such report was obtained), and based on those reports, no Mortgaged Property has a probable maximum loss greater than 19%.
With respect to certain of the Mortgaged Properties, the related borrowers (or, in some cases, tenants which are permitted to maintain insurance in lieu of the related borrowers) maintain insurance under blanket policies.
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties may be insured by, or subject to self-insurance on the part of, a sole or significant tenant or the property manager as described below:
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Rolla, MO, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Chili’s – Machesney Park, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Brainerd, MN, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – FedEx Ground – Casper, WY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Chili’s – McHenry, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Sulphur, LA, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Sonic – Tuscaloosa, AL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Columbia, SC, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Jacksonville, FL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Bridgestone HOSEpower – Elko, NV, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
209
– Jo-Ann – Freeport, IL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Tractor Supply – Hazen, ND, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Kingston, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Sonic – Robertsdale, AL, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Tractor Supply – Flandreau, SD, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Farmington, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Otego, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Kerhonkson, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Dewitt, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Utica, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Parish, NY, AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Dollar General – Geddes, NY, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 46643 Ryan Court, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 10088 South 136th Street, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 350 International Drive, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 210 Pierce Road, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 815 Industrial Parkway, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 11495 Deerfield Road, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 12 Mechanic Street, GNL Industrial Portfolio – 911 Industrial Parkway, El Dorado Tech Center, Kohl’s – Jensen Beach, Kohl’s Neenah, Walgreens - Harlingen, TX, Walgreens - Dallas, GA, Walgreens – Guthrie, OK, Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, representing in the aggregate approximately 11.7% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, each related borrower may rely on the applicable single tenant’s insurance or self-insurance, so long as the single tenant’s lease is in effect and no default has occurred under the lease and either (i) the tenant’s insurance meets the requirements under the related Mortgage Loan documents or (ii) the tenant’s insurance requirements under its lease, including any permitted self-insurance, were otherwise acceptable to the originator. If the single tenant fails to provide acceptable insurance coverage, the related borrower must obtain or provide supplemental coverage to meet the requirements under the Mortgage Loan documents or the lease (as applicable under the circumstances). |
Further, with respect to Mortgaged Properties that are part of condominium regimes, the insurance may be maintained by the condominium association rather than the related borrower. In some cases involving major tenants, the application of insurance proceeds and condemnation awards to repair or restore a Mortgaged Property may be subject to the related lease. Many Mortgage Loans contain limitations on the obligation to obtain terrorism insurance. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties”. See also representation and warranty nos. 16 and 29 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance”.
Use Restrictions
Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to restrictions that restrict the use of such Mortgaged Properties to its current use, place other use restrictions on such Mortgaged Property or limit the related borrower’s ability to make changes to such Mortgaged Property.
In the case of such Mortgage Loans subject to such restrictions, the related borrower is generally required pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents to maintain law or ordinance insurance coverage if any of the improvements or the use of a Mortgaged Property constitutes a legal non-conforming structure or use, which provides coverage for loss to the undamaged portion of such property, demolition costs and the increased cost of
210
construction. However, such law and ordinance insurance coverage does not provide any coverage for lost future rents or other damages from the inability to restore the property to its prior use or structure or for any loss of value to the related property. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” and representation and warranty nos. 6 and 24 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Concord Place, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, pursuant to a certain Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, the related Mortgaged Property is only to be used for office and/or multi-family purposes.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as 4851 South Alameda Street, representing approximately 1.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, a tenant, Nationwide Pallets Inc., representing approximately 8.5% of total annual rent, leases approximately 54,230 square feet of paved lot area at the Mortgaged Property, which it uses to fabricate and store wood pallets. The tenant lacks a certificate of occupancy or a conditional use permit, which is required in order to comply with the City of Los Angeles building and zoning code. The borrower is required to rectify the violation within 180 days, and any loss to the lender resulting from the failure to obtain the certificate of occupancy is recourse to the guarantor.
In addition, certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to “historic” or “landmark” designations, which results in restrictions and in some cases prohibitions on modification of certain aspects of the related Mortgaged Property.
Some Mortgaged Properties are subject to use restrictions arising out of environmental issues. See “—Environmental Considerations” above.
Appraised Value
In certain cases, appraisals may reflect “as-is” values and values other than “as-is”. However, the Appraised Value reflected in this prospectus with respect to each Mortgaged Property reflects only the “as-is” value unless otherwise specified in this prospectus, Annex A-1 and/or the related footnotes. The values other than “as-is” may be based on certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting, payment of tenant improvement or leasing commissions allowances or free or abated rent periods, or increased tenant occupancies. The table below shows the LTV and appraised value using values other than “as-is”, as well as the corresponding LTV and appraised value using “as-is” values.
211
Mortgaged Property | % of Initial Pool Balance | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (Other Than “As-Is”) | Maturity Date LTV Ratio (Other than “As-Is”) | Appraised Value (Other Than “As-Is”) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (“As-Is”) | Maturity Date LTV Ratio (“As-Is”) | Appraised Value (“As-Is”) | |||||||
Park Place at Florham Park(1) | 4.3% | 65.1% | 65.1% | $ 96,000,000 | 68.5% | 68.5% | $91,200,000 | |||||||
The Village at La Orilla(2) | 1.5% | 69.8% | 57.2% | $ 22,050,000 | 71.7% | 58.8% | $21,450,000 | |||||||
South Bend Medical Office(3) | 1.5% | 69.7% | 57.5% | $ 21,800,000 | 71.0% | 58.6% | $21,400,000 |
(1) | The appraised value represents an alternate “as-is” appraised value of $96,000,000, which assumes that outstanding landlord obligations for free rent, tenant improvements and leasing commissions are fully funded and escrowed by the lender through a title company. Approximately $5,044,401 of landlord obligations were reserved at origination. |
(2) | The appraised value represents the “as-stabilized” appraised value of $22,050,000, which reflects the value of the related Mortgaged Property after its projected occupancy by certain tenants not yet open for business. The “as-stabilized” appraised value was used in the calculation of the related loan-to-value ratios because (i) the “as-stabilized” valuation date of January 1, 2018 has passed and (ii) an earnout reserve of $622,968 was established at origination of the Mortgage Loan in connection with the tenants not yet in occupancy. |
(3) | The appraised value used in the calculation of the loan-to-value ratio for each Mortgaged Property is reflected in the appraisal as the “as-stabilized” appraised value of $21,800,000, which reflects the value of the Mortgaged Properties upon reaching 95% occupancy. Subsequent to the date of the appraisal, the sole tenant at each Mortgaged Property renewed its lease for a term extending beyond the maturity of the Mortgage Loan and the Mortgaged Properties are 100% occupied. As such, the $21,800,000 appraised value is reflected herein as the “as is” appraised value. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property”.
Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations
While the Mortgage Loans generally contain non-recourse carveouts for liabilities such as liabilities as a result of fraud by the borrower, certain voluntary insolvency proceedings or other matters, certain of the Mortgage Loans may not contain such carveouts or contain limitations to such carveouts. In general, the liquidity and net worth of a non-recourse guarantor under a Mortgage Loan will be less, and may be materially less, than the outstanding principal amount of that Mortgage Loan. In addition, certain Mortgage Loans have additional limitations to the non-recourse carveouts or may not have a separate non-recourse carveout guarantor or environmental indemnitor. See representation and warranty no. 26 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1). For example:
● | A substantial portion of the Mortgage Loans, including several of the 15 largest Mortgage Loans, provide, with respect to liability for breaches of the environmental covenants in the Mortgage Loan documents, that the recourse obligations for environmental indemnification may terminate immediately (or in some cases, following a specified period, such as two or three years) after payment or defeasance in full of such Mortgage Loans (or in some cases, after a permitted transfer of the Mortgaged Property) if certain conditions more fully set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents are satisfied, such as that the holder of the Mortgage Loan must have received an environmental inspection report for the related Mortgaged Property meeting criteria set forth in such Mortgage Loan documents, or that the holder must have received comprehensive record searches evidencing that there are no “Recognized Environmental Conditions” at the Mortgaged Property. |
212
● | With respect to certain of the Mortgage Loans the related guaranty and/or environmental indemnity contains provisions to the effect that, provided certain conditions are satisfied, the recourse liability of the guarantor will not apply to any action, event or condition arising after the foreclosure, delivery of a deed in lieu of foreclosure, or appointment of a receiver, of the Mortgaged Property, pursuant to such Mortgage Loan and/or after the foreclosure, acceptance of a transfer in lieu of foreclosure or appointment of a receiver by a mezzanine lender under any related mezzanine loan. |
● | The non-recourse carveout provisions contained in certain of the Mortgage Loan documents may also limit the liability of the non-recourse carveout guarantor for certain monetary obligations or covenants related to the use and operation of the Mortgaged Property to the extent that there is sufficient cash flow generated by the Mortgaged Property and made available to the related borrower and/or non-recourse carveout guarantor to take or prevent such required action. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, there is no recourse to a separate guarantor for (1) the borrower’s misappropriation of security deposits or, alternatively, the failure of any security deposits to be delivered to lender upon foreclosure or action in lieu thereof (except to the extent applied in accordance with leases prior to a Mortgage Loan event of default) or (2) the borrower’s commission of intentional material physical waste at the Mortgaged Property. In addition, the Mortgage Loan documents do not provide for recourse to the related guarantor for breaches of the environmental covenants. In lieu of an environmental indemnity signed by a guarantor, the borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy. See “—Environmental Considerations” above. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as El Dorado Tech Center, representing approximately 2.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, there is no related non-recourse carveout guarantor distinct from the related borrower. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, collectively representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, there is no recourse to the guarantor for any breach of the environmental covenants contained in the related Mortgage Loan documents and an environmental indemnity was not obtained from an entity distinct from the related borrower. |
In addition, there may be impediments and/or difficulties in enforcing some or all of the non-recourse carveout liability obligations of individual guarantors depending on the domicile or citizenship of the guarantor.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed”.
213
Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations
Below are descriptions of real estate tax matters relating to certain Mortgaged Properties.
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, representing approximately 5.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, in August 2007, the borrower entered into a 20-year PILOT agreement with the County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency (“IDA”) pursuant to which the borrower is required to pay, in lieu of taxes, an amount equal to $1,082,118 (the “Base Amount”) in special district charges and assessments during years 1-5 with a 3% per annum increase in the Base Amount in years 6-20; provided that the agreement permits the reduction of the Base Amount in the event there are special charges and assessments in excess of $60,000; and provided, further, that in the event the borrower constructs additional improvements that lead to an increase in the assessed value, the Base Amount may increase. In connection with the PILOT agreement, the borrower leased the Mortgaged Property to IDA pursuant to a ground lease that requires rent of $1.00 per year and is co-terminus with the PILOT agreement. The IDA subleased the Mortgaged Property back to the borrower to operate the related property. The lender has the right to terminate the ground lease and the related sub-lease in connection with a foreclosure proceeding against the borrower. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Kronos Incorporated, representing approximately 38.3% of net rentable area, entered into a tax incentive financing agreement (“TIF”) with the City of Lowell in connection with Kronos Incorporated’s relocation of its corporate headquarters to the Mortgaged Property. The 12-year agreement provides Kronos Incorporated with a tax exemption and in return Kronos Incorporated is required to, among other things, (i) create 400 new jobs at the Mortgaged Property, (ii) work with UMass Lowell & other local colleges to hire Lowell residents and (iii) invest $18.5 million of capital improvements into Kronos Incorporated’s space. If Kronos Incorporated fails to comply with the conditions of the TIF, the City of Lowell may be able to retroactively recapture Kronos Incorporated’s benefits under the TIF. Pursuant to the Kronos Incorporated lease, the tax exemptions from the TIF are passed through to Kronos Incorporated. The TIF is personal to Kronos Incorporated, and the borrower will not have any obligation or liability resulting from any default by Kronos Incorporated. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Village at La Orilla, representing approximately 1.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property is subject to an industrial revenue bond (“IRB”) structure pursuant to which a bond was issued in the maximum principal amount of $4,000,000 (the “Bond”) to be used in connection with the acquisition, improvement and equipping of the Mortgaged Property. In connection with the IRB structure, the related borrower transferred its fee simple interest in the Mortgaged Property to Bernalillo County, New Mexico (the “County”) and the County leased the Mortgaged Property back to the related borrower pursuant to a lease agreement (the “Bond Lease”). The Bond Lease expires on the earlier of the date of payment of the Bond, the termination of the Bond Lease pursuant to the terms of the Bond Lease or August 1, 2032, and provides for rental payments in an amount equal to the sum of (i) the principal and interest payments due on the Bond (which interest is calculated at 2.0% annually), and (ii) a $1,500 |
214
annual depositary fee. At the expiration (or earlier termination) of the Bond Lease, the County is required to re-convey its fee simple interest in the Mortgaged Property to the related borrower for payment of $1.00 (plus any unpaid payment-in-lieu of taxes (“PILOT”) or other outstanding fees). Additionally, in connection with the Mortgage Loan, the County entered into a joinder to the security instrument securing the Mortgage Loan mortgaging its fee interest in the Mortgaged Property and agreeing to certain lender protection provisions to the benefit of the lender. The Bond Lease provides, among other things, for a PILOT under which the Mortgaged Property is assessed payments in an amount equal to a base PILOT amount of $17,031.56, which is calculated based on the Mortgaged Property’s 2016 real property mill rate (the “PILOT Base Amount”), plus 42% of any incremental increase over the PILOT Base Amount in the Mortgaged Property’s assessed real and personal property mill levy, annualized over the stated maturity of the Bond (the “PILOT Payments”). Under the terms of the Bond Lease, the related borrower is directly responsible for all PILOT Payments and any costs and expenses due to the County during the term of the Bond Lease. In the event the Bond Lease is terminated before August 1, 2027, the related borrower is required to pay the County an amount equal to the difference between the abated taxes and the PILOT Payments made. Additionally, in the event that the related borrower and the Mortgaged Property fail to satisfy certain performance covenants relating to employment and projected wage targets, then the related borrower is directly responsible only for the year of such failure to pay the County an amount equal to the product of (x) the difference between the abated taxes and the PILOT Payments made and (y) the applicable percentage set forth in the Bond Lease dependent of the percentage of the employment and/or projected wage target achieved. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Dorset & Market Street, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the portion of the Mortgaged Property located at 102 Dorset Street, currently leased 100% by Barnes and Noble, is located on a separate tax lot. Under the terms of its lease, Barnes & Noble is responsible for paying the real estate taxes directly to the taxing authority. Taxes are paid in three equal annual installments of approximately $23,137. If tax payments are delinquent, a 9% penalty is assessed requiring a total payment of $25,220. An upfront reserve of the total payment plus penalty of $25,220 was funded at origination. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Eight Points Shopping Center, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is subject to a redevelopment agreement dated August 6, 2012 with the City of Poplar Bluff, Missouri. Pertinent provisions of the redevelopment agreement provide for the acquisition and development of the Mortgaged Property by the borrower’s predecessor in interest. The City of Poplar Bluff issued bonds to fund the cost of certain infrastructure related to the development of the Mortgaged Property. Debt service on such bonds is to be paid by the City of Poplar Bluff from the incremental increase in property taxes derived from the Mortgaged Property post-development. Taxes were underwritten at the increased property tax resulting from the development. The borrower and the sponsor have no obligation for repayment of the bond issue. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds”.
215
Delinquency Information
As of the Cut-off Date, none of the Mortgage Loans will be 30 days or more delinquent and none of the Mortgage Loans have been 30 days or more delinquent since origination. A Mortgage Loan will be treated as 30 days delinquent if the scheduled payment for a due date is not received from the related borrower by the immediately following due date.
Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans
Amortization of Principal
The Mortgage Loans provide for one or more of the following:
Twenty-eight (28) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 56.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for interest only payments for the entire term to stated maturity, with no scheduled amortization prior to that date.
Nineteen (19) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 23.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, require monthly payments of interest and principal based on amortization schedules significantly longer than the remaining term to stated maturity.
Seventeen (17) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 19.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for an initial interest-only period that expires between eight (8) and sixty (60) months following the related origination date and thereafter require monthly payments of principal and interest based on amortization schedules significantly longer than the remaining term to stated maturity.
Three (3) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for interest-only payments prior to a specified Anticipated Repayment Date, occurring approximately 10 years following the origination date with respect to the subject Mortgage Loan, with no scheduled amortization prior to that date.
Amortization Type | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | ||||||
Full IO | 28 | $593,792,750 | 56.8 | % | |||||
Amortizing | 19 | 248,144,142 | 23.7 | ||||||
Partial IO | 17 | 200,462,500 | 19.2 | ||||||
Full IO, ARD | 3 | 2,768,500 | 0.3 | ||||||
Total: | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0 | % |
Due Dates; Mortgage Rates; Calculations of Interest
Subject in some cases to a next business day convention, all of the Mortgage Loans have due dates upon which scheduled payments of principal, interest or both are required to be made by the related borrower under the related Mortgage Note (each such date, a “Due Date”) that occur as described in the following table:
216
Overview of Due Dates
Due Date |
| Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx.
% of | ||||||
1 | 15 | $274,870,010 | 26.3 | % | ||||||
4 | 1 | 50,000,000 | 4.8 | |||||||
6 | 51 | 720,297,882 | 68.9 | |||||||
Total: | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0 | % |
The Mortgage Loans have grace periods as set forth in the following table:
Overview of Grace Periods
Grace Period (Days) | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Approx.
% of | |||||||
0 | 56 | $884,697,882 | 84.6 | % | ||||||
2 | 1 | 50,000,000 | 4.8 | |||||||
5 | 1 | 12,386,589 | 1.2 | |||||||
7 | 9 | 98,083,420 | 9.4 | |||||||
Total: | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0 | % |
As used in this prospectus, “grace period” is the number of days before a payment default is an event of default under the terms of each Mortgage Loan. See Annex A-1 for information on the number of days before late payment charges are due under the Mortgage Loans. The information on Annex A-1 regarding the number of days before a late payment charge is due is based on the express terms of the Mortgage Loans. Some jurisdictions may impose a statutorily longer period.
All of the Mortgage Loans are secured by first liens on, or security interests in fee simple, leasehold or a similar interest in the related Mortgaged Properties, subject to the permitted exceptions reflected in the related title insurance policy. All of the Mortgage Loans bear fixed interest rates.
All of the Mortgage Loans accrue interest on the basis of the actual number of days in a month, assuming a 360-day year (“Actual/360 Basis”).
ARD Loans
Three (3) Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, respectively, (the “ARD Loans”), collectively representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, each provides that, after a certain date (an “Anticipated Repayment Date”), if the related borrower has not prepaid the ARD Loan in full, any principal outstanding on that date will accrue interest at an increased interest rate (a “Revised Rate”) rather than the original stated Mortgage Rate (an “Initial Rate”). See Annex A-1 for the Anticipated Repayment Date and the Revised Rate for each ARD Loan.
Each ARD Loan is interest-only; consequently, the repayment of the ARD Loan in full on its Anticipated Repayment Date would require a substantial payment of principal on that date (except to the extent that such ARD Loan is repaid prior thereto). The ARD provisions described above, to the extent applicable, may result in an incentive for the related borrower to repay an ARD Loan on or before its Anticipated Repayment Date but the related
217
borrower will have no obligation to do so. We make no statement regarding the likelihood that an ARD Loan will be repaid on its Anticipated Repayment Date.
After its Anticipated Repayment Date, each ARD Loan further requires that all cash flow available from the related Mortgaged Property after payment of the monthly debt service payments required under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents and all escrows and property expenses required under the related Mortgage Loan documents be used to accelerate amortization of principal (without payment of any yield maintenance premium or prepayment charge) on such ARD Loan. While interest at the Initial Rate continues to accrue and be payable on a current basis on an ARD Loan after its Anticipated Repayment Date, the payment of Excess Interest will be deferred until, and such Excess Interest will be required to be paid only after, the outstanding principal balance of the ARD Loan has been paid in full, at which time the Excess Interest, to the extent actually collected, will be paid to the holders of the Class Z certificates. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks of Anticipated Repayment Date Loans”.
“Excess Interest” with respect to an ARD Loan is the interest accrued on the related outstanding principal balance at the Revised Rate in respect of such ARD Loan in excess of the interest accrued at the Initial Rate, plus any related interest accrued on such amounts, to the extent permitted by applicable law and the related Mortgage Loan documents.
Single Purpose Entity Covenants
In some cases, borrowers under the subject Mortgage Loans may have previously owned non-collateral real property.
See representation and warranty no. 31 on Annex D-1 and the exceptions thereto, if any, on Annex D-2 (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex D-1).
See “—Additional Indebtedness” below. See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Laws”.
Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments
All of the Mortgage Loans have a degree of voluntary prepayment protection in the form of defeasance or prepayment lockout provisions and/or yield maintenance provisions. Voluntary prepayments, if permitted, generally require the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or a Prepayment Premium unless the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) is prepaid within a specified period (ranging from approximately 2 to 7 payments) up to and including the stated maturity date. See Annex A-1 and Annex A-2 for more information on the prepayment protections attributable to the Mortgage Loans on a loan-by-loan basis and a pool basis.
Additionally, certain Mortgage Loans may provide that in the event of the exercise of a purchase option by a tenant or the sale of real property or the release of a portion of the Mortgaged Property, that the related Mortgage Loans may be prepaid or defeased in part prior to the expiration of a prepayment/defeasance lockout provision. See “—Releases; Partial Releases” below.
Generally, no Yield Maintenance Charge will be required for prepayments in connection with a casualty or condemnation, unless, in the case of most of the Mortgage Loans, an event of default has occurred and is continuing. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment
218
Premiums or Defeasance Provisions” in the prospectus. In addition, certain of the Mortgage Loans permit the related borrower, after a total or partial casualty or partial condemnation, to prepay the remaining principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or the remaining allocated loan amount of the related Mortgaged Property (in each case, after application of the related insurance proceeds or condemnation award to pay the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan), which may not be accompanied by any prepayment consideration.
Certain of the Mortgage Loans are secured in part by letters of credit and/or cash reserves that in each such case:
● | will be released to the related borrower upon satisfaction by the related borrower of certain performance related conditions, which may include, in some cases, meeting debt service coverage ratio or debt yield levels and/or satisfying leasing conditions; and |
● | if not so released, may, at the discretion of the lender, prior to loan maturity (or earlier loan default or loan acceleration), be drawn on and/or applied to prepay the subject Mortgage Loan if such performance related conditions are not satisfied within specified time periods. |
See Annex A-1 and Annex A-3 for more information on reserves relating to the largest 15 Mortgage Loans.
Voluntary Prepayments
As of origination, the following prepayment restrictions and defeasance provisions applied to the Mortgage Loans:
● | Fifty-four (54) of the Mortgage Loans, collectively representing approximately 75.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, each prohibits voluntary principal prepayments during a specified period of time (each, a “Lock-out Period”) but permits the related borrower (after an initial period of at least two years following the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates) for a specified period to defease the related Mortgage Loan by pledging non-callable United States Treasury obligations and other non-callable government securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act, as amended (“Government Securities”) that provide for payment on or prior to each Due Date through and including the maturity date (or, in some cases, such earlier Due Date on which the Mortgage Loan becomes freely prepayable), of amounts at least equal to the amounts that would have been payable or outstanding, as applicable, on those dates under the terms of the subject Mortgage Loan and obtaining the release of the related Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related mortgage, and thereafter such Mortgage Loan is freely prepayable. |
● | Nine (9) of the Mortgage Loans, collectively representing approximately 20.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, each prohibit voluntary principal prepayments during a Lock-out Period, and following such Lock-out Period, permits the related borrower to make voluntary principal prepayments upon the payment of the greater of a Yield Maintenance Charge or a Prepayment Premium for a specified period, and thereafter such Mortgage Loan is freely prepayable. |
● | One (1) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 3.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, permits the related borrower to make voluntary principal prepayments upon the payment of the greater of a Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment |
219
Premium for a specified period, and thereafter for a specified period, permits the borrower to either make voluntary principal prepayments upon the payment of either the greater of a Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium or defeasance and thereafter such Mortgage Loan is freely prepayable. |
● | Three (3) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, each permits the related borrower to make voluntary principal prepayments upon the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge for a specified period, and thereafter for a specified period, permits the borrower to either (a) make voluntary principal prepayments upon the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or (b) to defease such Mortgage Loan by pledging Government Securities (or, in some cases, other securities, subject to certain REMIC and rating conditions) that provide for payment on or prior to each Due Date through and including the maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable (or, in some cases, such earlier Due Date on which the Mortgage Loan becomes freely prepayable), of amounts at least equal to the amounts that would have been payable (or, in the case of an Anticipated Repayment Date or the commencement of an open prepayment period, outstanding) on those dates under the terms of the subject Mortgage Loan and obtaining the release of the related Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related mortgage, and thereafter such Mortgage Loan is freely prepayable. |
The Mortgage Loans generally permit voluntary prepayment without payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or any Prepayment Premium during a limited “open period” immediately prior to and including the stated maturity date, as follows:
Prepayment Open Periods
Open Periods (Payments) | Number of Mortgage Loans | % of Initial Pool Balance | |||||
2 | 1 | 5.7 | % | ||||
3 | 9 | 13.1 | |||||
4 | 48 | 60.9 | |||||
5 | 2 | 6.1 | |||||
6 | 1 | 4.8 | |||||
7 | 6 | 9.3 | |||||
Total | 67 | 100.0 | % |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions”.
“Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions
The Mortgage Loans generally contain “due-on-sale" and “due-on-encumbrance” clauses, which in each case permits the holder of the Mortgage Loan to accelerate the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan if the related borrower sells or otherwise transfers or encumbers (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents) the related Mortgaged Property or a controlling interest in the borrower without the consent of the mortgagee (which, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld). Many of the Mortgage Loans place certain restrictions (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents) on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations. The terms of the mortgages generally permit, subject to certain limitations,
220
affiliate, estate planning and family transfers, transfers at death, transfers of interest in a public company, the transfer or pledge of less than, or other than, a controlling portion of the partnership, members’ or other equity interests in a borrower, the transfer or pledge of passive equity interests in a borrower (such as limited partnership interests and non-managing member interests in a limited liability company) and transfers to persons specified in or satisfying qualification criteria set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of direct or indirect ownership interests in the related borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in the related borrower by imposing a specific percentage, a control limitation or requiring the consent of the mortgagee to any such transfer. Generally, the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit transfers of non-controlling interests so long as no change of control results or, with respect to Mortgage Loans to tenant-in-common borrowers, transfers to new tenant-in-common borrowers. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit the pledge by direct or indirect owners of the related borrower of equity distributions that may be made from time to time by the borrower to its equity owners.
Additionally, certain of the Mortgage Loans provide that transfers of the Mortgaged Property are permitted if certain conditions are satisfied, which may include one or more of the following:
● | no event of default has occurred; |
● | the proposed transferee is creditworthy and has sufficient experience in the ownership and management of properties similar to the Mortgaged Property; |
● | a Rating Agency Confirmation has been obtained from each of the Rating Agencies; |
● | the transferee has executed and delivered an assumption agreement evidencing its agreement to abide by the terms of the Mortgage Loan together with legal opinions and title insurance endorsements; and |
● | the assumption fee has been received (which assumption fee will be paid as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”, but will in no event be paid to the Certificateholders); however, certain of the Mortgage Loans allow the borrower to sell or otherwise transfer the related Mortgaged Property a limited number of times without paying an assumption fee. |
Transfers resulting from the foreclosure of a pledge of the collateral for a mezzanine loan (if any) or other permitted pledge of equity in a borrower will also result in a permitted transfer. See “—Additional Indebtedness” below.
Defeasance
The terms of fifty-eight (58) of the Mortgage Loans (the “Defeasance Loans”), representing approximately 79.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, permit the applicable borrower at any time (provided that no event of default exists) after a specified period (the “Defeasance Lock-Out Period”) to obtain a release of a Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related Mortgage (a “Defeasance Option”) in connection with a defeasance. With respect to all of the Defeasance Loans, the Defeasance Lock-Out Period ends at least two years after the Closing Date.
Exercise of a Defeasance Option is also generally conditioned on, among other things, (a) the borrower providing the mortgagee with at least 30 days prior written notice of the
221
date on which such defeasance will occur (such date, the “Release Date”), and (b) the borrower (A) paying on any Release Date (i) all accrued and unpaid interest on the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or, the related Whole Loan) up to and including the Release Date, (ii) all other sums (excluding scheduled interest or principal payments due following the Release Date), due under the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) and under all other Mortgage Loan documents executed in connection with the Defeasance Option, (iii) an amount (the “Defeasance Deposit”) that will be sufficient to (x) purchase non-callable obligations of, or backed by the full faith and credit of, the United States of America or, in certain cases, other “government securities” (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and otherwise satisfying REMIC requirements for defeasance collateral), that provide payments (1) on or prior to, but as close as possible to, all successive scheduled due dates occurring during the period from the Release Date to the related maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date (or to the first day of the open period for such Mortgage Loan) (or Whole Loan, if applicable) and (2) in amounts equal to the scheduled payments due on such due dates under the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable), or under the defeased portion of the Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) in the case of a partial defeasance, including in the case of a Mortgage Loan with a balloon payment due at maturity or anticipated to be paid on the related Anticipated Repayment Date, the related balloon payment, and (y) pay any costs and expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of such government securities, and (B) delivering a security agreement granting the issuing entity a first priority lien on the Defeasance Deposit and, in certain cases, the government securities purchased with the Defeasance Deposit and an opinion of counsel to such effect. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded”.
For additional information on Mortgage Loans that permit partial defeasance, see “—Releases; Partial Releases” below.
In general, if consistent with the related Mortgage Loan documents, a successor borrower established, designated or approved by the master servicer will assume the obligations of the related borrower exercising a Defeasance Option and the borrower will be relieved of its obligations under the Mortgage Loan. If a Mortgage Loan (or Whole Loan, if applicable) is partially defeased, if consistent with the related Mortgage Loan documents, generally the related promissory note will be split and only the defeased portion of the borrower’s obligations will be transferred to the successor borrower.
Releases; Partial Releases
The Mortgage Loans described below permit the release of one or more of the Mortgaged Properties or a portion of a single Mortgaged Property in connection with a partial defeasance, a partial prepayment or a partial substitution, subject to the satisfaction of certain specified conditions, including the REMIC requirements. Additionally, certain Mortgage Loans permit the addition of real property to the Mortgage Loan collateral.
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, representing approximately 5.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, after January 1, 2019, the borrowers are permitted to obtain the release of any individual Mortgaged Property in connection with a bona fide third-party sale; provided that, the borrowers make a prepayment of principal in an amount equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the net sales proceeds and (ii) the percentage of the allocated loan amount for such Mortgaged Property specified in |
222
the Mortgage Loan documents, together with a yield maintenance premium. In addition, the borrowers are permitted to release and substitute one or more individual Mortgaged Properties; provided that, among other things, (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, (ii) the allocated loan amounts for all Mortgaged Properties theretofore substituted do not exceed 25% of the original principal balance of the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, (iii) unless otherwise agreed to by the lender in its sole discretion, the total number of substitutions requested by the borrowers (taking into account the then-requested substitution) will not exceed three substitutions, (iv) no substitution will occur during the twelve month period preceding January 1, 2028, (v) the borrowers will deliver to lender a rating agency confirmation as to the substitution, (vi) after giving effect to the substitution, the debt service coverage ratio for all of the Mortgaged Properties will be no less than the debt service coverage ratio for the Mortgaged Properties immediately preceding such substitution, (vii) the borrowers will deliver to the lender an acceptable appraisal of each proposed substitute property and each proposed released Mortgage Property indicating an appraised value of the substitute property (as reflected in such acceptable appraisal) that is equal to or greater than the appraised value of the released property as of the substitution date (as reflected in such acceptable appraisal) (provided, however, that with respect to the Mortgaged Properties known as Montecito Crossing, Best on the Boulevard or Jefferson Common, such properties may only be substituted if the value of the substitute property is equal to or greater than 110% of the appraised value of the released Mortgaged Property), (viii) with respect to the Mortgaged Properties known as Montecito Crossing, Best on the Boulevard or Jefferson Common, such properties may only be substituted if the net operating income of the substitute property is equal to or greater than 110% of the net operating income of the released Mortgaged Property and (ix) the borrowers will deliver to the lender such other documents, instruments and agreements as the lender may reasonably require relating to such substitution (including any documents as may be reasonably required by a special servicer in a securitization). |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgage Loan documents permit the release of an approximately one acre portion of the Mortgaged Property containing a vacant one-story building, provided that, among other things, the borrower delivers defeasance collateral in an amount equal to $1,440,000 (which amount is equal to the appraised value of such parcel). |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, representing approximately 4.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided that no event of default is continuing, on or after the earlier to occur of (i) March 6, 2021 and (ii) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized, the borrower is permitted to release an individual Mortgaged Property in connection with the sale of such building to an unaffiliated third party, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) prepayment or defeasance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to or greater than (x) 120% of the allocated loan amount for the Mortgaged Property being released and (y) the lender’s share of the net sales proceeds, (ii) after giving effect to such release, the debt service coverage ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Properties are not less than the greater of (x) 1.75x, respectively, and (y) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to such release, (iii) after giving effect to such release, the loan-to-value ratio |
223
for the remaining Mortgaged Properties is not greater than the lesser of (x) 65.1% and (y) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to such release, (iv) the net cash flow debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Properties is not greater than the lesser of (x) 9.0% and (y) the net cash flow debt yield prior to such release, (v) delivery of a REMIC opinion, (vi) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation and (vii) if a condominium conversion has occurred, the borrowers continue to control the condominium board. In addition, provided no event of default is continuing, the borrower has a one-time right to obtain the release of one of three non-income producing portions at the Mortgaged Properties (the “Development Parcel”), provided that, among other things: (i) such release does not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the remaining Mortgaged Properties, (ii) after giving effect to such release, each of the Development Parcel and the remaining Mortgaged Properties constitute a separate tax lot and conform to and are in compliance with all applicable legal requirements, (iii) satisfaction of the REMIC loan-to-value test and (iv) the use of the Development Parcel is limited to retail, residential, for sale residential condominiums or hotel uses. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net Leased Portfolio, representing approximately 3.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrower may obtain the release of one or more individual properties, upon satisfaction of certain requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents, including: (a) no event of default has occurred and is continuing (unless such release of property would cause a cure for an event of default), (b) the debt service coverage ratio of the remaining individual properties will be equal to or greater than the greater of (i) the debt service coverage ratio of all individual properties immediately prior to the release and (ii) 2.81x, (c) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining individual properties will be equal to or less than the lesser of (i) the loan-to-value ratio of all individual properties immediately prior to the release and (ii) 53.4%, (d) the borrower will either: (i) partially defease the Mortgage Loan, without payment of any yield maintenance premium (or any other prepayment penalty) in an amount equal to 120% of the allocated loan amount for the applicable release property (the “Release Amount”), and upon satisfaction of the REMIC requirements, (ii) partially prepay the Mortgage Loan, in an amount equal to the Release Amount, provided the prepayment will be accompanied by the yield maintenance premium and upon satisfaction of the REMIC Requirements or (iii) substitute a new individual property for the applicable release property, provided that the borrower may only make four substitutions (and further provided that the property identified on Annex A-1 as FedEx Ground Rolla, MO will constitute two substitutions), unless the tenant at the related release property has terminated its lease or is no longer in occupancy, in which case, the borrower may make unlimited substitutions. With respect to a substitution, the borrower must also satisfy the following requirements: (A) the delivery of a new appraisal for the substitute property, which must provide that the “as-is” value of the substitute property is not less than the Release Amount, (however, if the “as-is” value is less than the Release Amount, the borrower may partially prepay the loan by the difference accompanied by the applicable yield maintenance premium), (B) the substitute property must be a retail property or industrial property located in the continental United States (provided that, with respect to the properties identified on Annex A-1 as (1) AFIN Industrial and Retail Net Leased Portfolio - FedEx Ground (Brainerd, MN), (2) AFIN Industrial and Retail Net Leased Portfolio - FedEx Ground (Rolla, MO) and (3) AFIN Industrial and Retail Net Leased Portfolio - FedEx Ground (Casper, WY), the substitute property must be an industrial property), which is entirely triple net leased to a tenant with credit |
224
ratings not less than the tenant occupying the applicable release property and such lease must have (i) a term equal to or longer than the longer of (a) the term of the lease at the release property and (b) five years past the stated maturity date (January 6, 2028), (ii) no monetary obligations thereunder which will be the responsibility of the borrower and (iii) with net rent equal to or greater than the greater of the net rent under the lease at the release property on the closing date and immediately prior to the substitution, (C) the delivery of a Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to the substitution, (D) satisfaction of the REMIC requirements, and (E) satisfaction of any other requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as GNL Industrial Portfolio, representing approximately 3.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, any time after the expiration of the prepayment lockout period, the related borrower may obtain the release of any related Mortgaged Property in the portfolio, provided, among other things, that (i) it may not obtain the release of more than one of the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property, the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property and the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 350 International Drive Mortgaged Property, (ii) it makes a payment of a release price equal to (x) 125% of the allocated loan amount for the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property, the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property or the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 350 International Drive Mortgaged Property and (y) 115% of the allocated loan amount for the other applicable Mortgaged Properties, in each case, plus any required yield maintenance premium, and (iii) immediately following the release, (A) the debt service coverage ratio is no less than the greater of (1) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release of the applicable Mortgaged Property and (2) 2.79x, and (B) the loan-to-value ratio is no more than the lesser of (1) 52.2% and (2) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to the release of the applicable Mortgaged Property (provided that the related borrower may pay down the subject Mortgage Loan by an amount sufficient to satisfy the foregoing debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio tests, subject to any applicable yield maintenance charge requirement). |
In addition, from time to time and at any time on or after the expiration of the prepayment lockout period, if a lease sweep event or default or event of default exists under the related loan documents or if the related borrower reasonably anticipates that there will be a lease sweep event or default or event of default under the related loan documents based on written notice from a tenant that it intends to not renew its lease, to terminate its lease or to go dark, such related borrower may replace one or more related Mortgaged Properties (individually, a “Replaced Property” and, collectively, the “Replaced Properties”) with a new property (such new property being referred to herein as a “Substitute Property” and such replacement is referred to herein as a “Property Substitution”) solely to the extent necessary to cure or avoid such lease sweep period, default or event of default, provided that, in the case of each Property Substitution, the following conditions, among others, are met in the lender’s reasonable discretion, or waived in the lender’s sole discretion, to the extent applicable: (i) the related borrower has obtained a Rating Agency Confirmation from the Rating Agencies with respect to the Property Substitution; (ii) the related borrower has delivered to the lender a new lease(s) with a sole tenant or significant tenant with respect to the Substitute Property in form and substance acceptable to the lender in its sole discretion, but
225
no less favorable to the related borrower, including, without limitation, such lease being “triple net”, and accompanied by an estoppel agreement and/or subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement, as may be reasonably required by the lender in form and substance substantially similar to the subordination, nondisturbance and attornment agreement executed by the sole tenant or significant tenant(s) of the Replaced Property in connection with the origination of the subject Mortgage Loan which shall at a minimum include estoppel certificates reasonably satisfactory to the lender from all tenants reasonably requested by the lender; or (iii) after giving effect to such Property Substitution, (A) the pro forma net cash flow debt yield will not be less than the greater of (1) 12.48%, and (2) the pro forma net cash flow debt yield immediately prior to such substitution, provided, however, that the related borrower may pay down the subject Mortgage Loan by an amount which would result in a pro forma net cash flow debt yield required under this subclause (iii)(A) and (B) the loan-to-value ratio will not be greater than the lesser of (1) 52.2% and (2) the loan-to-value ratio in effect immediately prior to such substitution, provided, however, that the related borrower may pay down the subject Mortgage Loan by an amount which would result in a loan-to-value ratio required under this subclause (iii)(B), in each case subject to the payment of a yield maintenance charge (if applicable); (iv) the lender has received such other third party reports, financial statements and operating statements, documents and information regarding the underwriting of the Substitute Property as are provided for in the related loan documents; and (v) the lender has received from counsel reasonably satisfactory to the lender, an opinion that the Property Substitution does not cause any portion of the subject Mortgage Loan to cease to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Code, and that the Property Substitution does not constitute a “significant modification” of the subject Mortgage Loan under the REMIC provisions of the Code.
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as BlueLinx Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrowers may obtain the release of the Mortgaged Properties identified as Butner and Lawrenceville, provided that, among other things, (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, (ii) defeasance in an amount (x) with respect to the first release, equal to the greater of (a) 115% of the allocated loan amount and (b) 90% of the net sales proceeds applicable to the released Mortgaged Property and (y) with respect to the second release, equal to the greater of (a) 125% of the allocated loan amount and (b) 100% of the net sales proceeds applicable to the released Mortgaged Property, (iii) after giving effect to such release, the debt service coverage ratio and the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Properties are not less than the greater of (1) 2.49x and 11.12%, respectively, and (2) the debt service coverage ratio and the debt yield immediately prior to such release and (iv) delivery of an opinion as to the continued compliance with applicable REMIC requirements. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided that no event of default is continuing, after the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized and prior to April 6, 2022, the borrower has the right to obtain release of the Lexington Towers Mortgaged Property in conjunction with a transfer of such building to an unaffiliated third party, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) prepayment or |
226
defeasance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to the greater of (x) 125% of the allocated loan amount of the Lexington Towers Mortgaged Property and (y) the net sales proceeds of the Lexington Towers Mortgaged Property, (ii) after giving effect to such release, the debt service coverage ratio and the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not less than the greater of (x) 1.05x and 4.4%, respectively and (y) the debt service coverage ratio and the debt yield immediately prior to such release, (iii) after giving effect to such release, the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not greater than the lesser of (x) 61.8% and (y) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to such release, (iv) delivery of a REMIC opinion and (v) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Fortuna Center Plaza, representing approximately 1.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower may obtain the release of the portion of the Mortgaged Property leased to the second largest tenant, Walgreens, representing approximately 13.9% of the net rentable area, by partial defeasance of a portion of the Mortgage Loan subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral equal to the greater of (a) 120% of the allocated loan amount for such parcel, (b) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the debt service coverage ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Property not less than the debt service coverage ratio at loan origination, (c) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not less than the debt yield at loan origination and (d) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the loan-to-value for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not greater than the loan-to-value at loan origination; (ii) delivery of a REMIC opinion and (iii) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Dorset & Market Street, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided that no event of default is continuing, at any time after the date that is six months after the Closing Date, the borrower has the right to release a portion of the Mortgaged Property (the “Parking Deck Parcel”), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) after giving effect to such release, the debt service coverage ratio for the remaining property is at least 1.50x, (ii) after giving effect to such release, the debt yield for the remaining property is at least 9.75%, (iii) after giving effect to such release, the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining property is not greater than 64%, (iv) delivery of a REMIC opinion, (v) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation, (vi) construction of a new parking garage, to be completed within 24 months of construction commencement, containing sufficient parking spaces to accommodate all tenants and (vii) the Parking Deck Parcel is vacant of all tenants. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided that no event of default is continuing, after the defeasance lockout expiration date and prior to November 6, 2027 the borrower has the right to obtain the release of one of the Mortgaged Properties in connection with a transfer of such Mortgaged Property to an unaffiliated third party, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) prepayment or defeasance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to 125% of the allocated loan amount for the Mortgaged Property to be released, (ii) after giving effect to such release, the debt service |
227
coverage ratio and the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not less than the greater of (x) the debt service coverage ratio and the debt yield of all Mortgaged Properties as of the origination date, respectively and (y) the debt service coverage ratio and the debt yield immediately prior to such release, (iii) after giving effect to such release, the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not greater than the lesser of (x) the loan-to-value ratio for all Mortgaged Properties as of the origination date and (y) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to such release, (iv) delivery of a REMIC opinion and (v) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation. |
● | With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Plaza Point Shopping Center, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower may obtain the release of the portion of the Mortgaged Property leased to the fifth largest tenant, Cici’s Pizza, representing approximately 6.4% of the net rentable area, by partial defeasance of a portion of the Mortgage Loan subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral equal to the greater of (a) the greater of (1) 125% of the allocated loan amount for such parcel and (2) 100% of the net sales proceeds of such parcel, which in no event shall be less than 95% of the gross sales price of such parcel (without regard to customary adjustments and prorations), (b) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the debt service coverage ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Property not less than the greater of (1) the debt service coverage ratio at loan origination and (2) the debt service coverage ratio prior to release of such parcel, and (c) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the loan-to-value for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not greater than the lesser of (1) the loan-to-value at loan origination and (2) the loan-to-value prior to release of such parcel; (ii) delivery of a REMIC opinion and (iii) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation. |
Furthermore, some of the Mortgage Loans permit the release or substitution of specified parcels of real estate or improvements that secure the Mortgage Loans but were not assigned any material value or considered a source of any material cash flow for purposes of determining the related Appraised Value or Underwritten Net Cash Flow or considered material to the use or operation of the property, or permit the general right to release as yet unidentified parcels if they are non-income producing so long as such release does not materially adversely affect the use or value of the remaining property, among other things. Such real estate may be permitted to be released, subject to certain REMIC rules, without payment of a release price and consequent reduction of the principal balance of the subject Mortgage Loan or substitution of additional collateral if zoning and other conditions are satisfied. We cannot assure you that the development of a release parcel, even if approved by the special servicer as having no material adverse effect to the remaining property, may not for some period of time either disrupt operations or lessen the value of the remaining property.
For example, with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, representing approximately 5.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgage Loan documents permit the free release of approximately 70.9 acres of unused, vacant land, subject to certain conditions, including compliance with the REMIC provisions. The appraisal assigned no value to the release parcel. In addition, with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Seal Multifamily Portfolio, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgage Loan documents permit the free release of four (4) vacant, unimproved parcels totaling 1.41 acres, subject to the
228
satisfaction of certain conditions, including compliance with REMIC provisions. No value was given to such parcels. Additionally, with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Kohl’s Neenah, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the seller of the related Mortgaged Property has the exclusive option to purchase a designated unimproved outparcel of the related Mortgaged Property for a purchase price of $1.00 at any time within 15 years of the origination date of the subject Mortgage Loan. In connection therewith, the related Mortgage Loan documents permit the free release of such outparcel, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including that the related sole tenant’s lease is amended so that the related Mortgaged Property’s income stream does not change as a result of the release and the related Mortgaged Property (as well as the outparcel) continue to comply with zoning requirements. The related Mortgage Loan documents also require the outparcel release to be compliant with REMIC provisions.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Relating to Enforceability of Yield Maintenance Charges, Prepayment Premiums or Defeasance Provisions”.
Escrows
Forty-nine (49) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 73.4%% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover property taxes on the Mortgaged Properties.
Forty-nine (49) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 73.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover ongoing replacements and capital repairs.
Twenty-seven (27) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 52.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover planned capital expenditures, deferred maintenance or franchise-mandated property improvement plans.
Forty-one (41) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 62.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover insurance premiums on the Mortgaged Properties.
Thirty-four (34) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 83.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, are secured in whole or in part by office, retail, industrial and mixed use properties along with Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, provide for upfront or monthly escrows (or credit) for the full term or a portion of the term of the related Mortgage Loan to cover anticipated re-leasing costs, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions or other lease termination or occupancy issues. Such escrows are typically considered for office, retail, industrial and mixed use properties only.
Certain of the Mortgage Loans described above permit the related borrower to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of maintaining cash reserves. In addition, in certain cases, the related borrower may not be required to maintain the escrows described above until the occurrence of a specified trigger.
Many of the Mortgage Loans provide for other escrows and reserves, including, in certain cases, reserves for debt service, operating expenses, vacancies at the related Mortgaged Property and other shortfalls or reserves to be released under circumstances described in the related Mortgage Loan documents.
229
See the footnotes to Annex A-1 for more information regarding escrows under the Mortgage Loan documents.
Mortgaged Property Accounts
Cash Management. The Mortgage Loan documents prescribe the manner in which the related borrowers are permitted to collect rents from tenants at each Mortgaged Property. The following table sets forth the account mechanics prescribed for the Mortgage Loans:
Cash Management Types
Type of Lockbox | Number of Mortgage Loans | Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of Mortgage Loans | Approx. % of Initial Pool Balance | ||||||
Springing | 38 | $435,074,942 | 41.6 | % | |||||
Hard/Springing | 17 | 385,134,194 | 36.8 | ||||||
Hard/In Place | 7 | 144,158,756 | 13.8 | ||||||
Soft/Springing | 4 | 71,300,000 | 6.8 | ||||||
None | 1 | 9,500,000 | 0.9 | ||||||
Total: | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0 | % |
The following is a description of the types of cash management provisions to which the borrowers under the Mortgage Loans are subject:
● | Hard/In Place Cash Management. The related borrower is required to instruct the tenants and other payors (including any third party property managers) to pay all rents and other revenue directly to a lockbox account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. Funds are then swept into a cash management account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity and then applied by the applicable servicer in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents. This typically includes the payment of debt service and, in some cases, expenses at the related Mortgaged Property. Generally, excess funds may then be remitted to the related borrower. |
● | Hard/Springing Cash Management. The related borrower is required to instruct the tenants and other payors (including any third party property managers) to pay all rents and other revenue directly to a lockbox account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. Until the occurrence of a “trigger” event, which typically includes an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents, such funds are forwarded to an account controlled by the related borrower or are otherwise made available to the related borrower. From and after the occurrence of such a “trigger” event, only the portion of such funds remaining after the payment of current debt service, the funding of reserves and, in some cases, expenses at the related Mortgaged Property are to be forwarded or otherwise made available to the related borrower or, in some cases, maintained in an account controlled by the servicer as additional collateral for the loan until the “trigger” event ends or terminates in accordance with the loan documentation. |
● | Soft/In Place Cash Management. Revenue from the related Mortgaged Property is generally paid by the tenants and other payors to the related borrower or the property manager. The related borrower or property manager, as applicable, then forwards such funds to a lockbox account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. Funds are then swept into a cash management account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity and |
230
applied by the servicer in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents. This typically includes the payment of debt service and, in some cases, expenses at the related Mortgaged Property. Generally, excess funds may then be remitted to the related borrower. |
● | Soft/Springing Cash Management. Revenue from the related Mortgaged Property is generally paid by the tenants and other payors (including any third party property managers) to the related borrower or the property manager. The related borrower or property manager, as applicable, then forwards such funds to a lockbox account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. Until the occurrence of a “trigger” event, which typically includes an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents, such funds are forwarded to an account controlled by the related borrower or are otherwise made available to the related borrower. In some cases, upon the occurrence of such a “trigger” event, the Mortgage Loan documents will require the related borrower to instruct tenants and/or other payors to pay directly into an account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. All funds held in such lockbox account controlled by the applicable servicer following such “trigger” event will be applied by the applicable servicer in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents. From and after the occurrence of such a trigger event, only the portion of such funds remaining after the payment of current debt service and, in some cases, expenses at the related Mortgaged Property are to be forwarded or otherwise made available to the related borrower. |
● | Springing. A lockbox account is established at origination or upon the occurrence of certain “trigger” events. Revenue from the related Mortgaged Property is generally paid by the tenants and other payors to the related borrower or property manager. The Mortgage Loan documents provide that, upon the occurrence of a “trigger” event, which typically includes an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents, the related borrower would be required to instruct tenants to pay directly into such lockbox account or, if tenants are directed to pay to the related borrower or the property manager, the related borrower or property manager, as applicable, would then forward such funds to a lockbox account controlled by the applicable servicer on behalf of the issuing entity. Funds are then swept into a cash management account controlled by the servicer on behalf of the issuing entity and applied by the servicer in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents. This typically includes the payment of debt service and, in some cases, expenses at the related Mortgaged Property. Excess funds may then be remitted to the related borrower. |
● | None. Revenue from the related Mortgaged Property is paid to the related borrower and is not subject to a lockbox account as of the Closing Date, and no lockbox account is required to be established during the term of the related Mortgage Loan. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with any hard lockbox cash management, income deposited directly into the related lockbox account may not include amounts paid in cash and/or checks that are paid directly to the related property manager, notwithstanding requirements to the contrary. Furthermore, with respect to certain multifamily and hospitality properties considered to have a hard lockbox, cash, checks and “over-the-counter” receipts may be deposited into the lockbox account by the property manager and, in some cases, such deposit may be net of fees payable to and reserves maintained by the property manager, as well as certain other operating expenses. Mortgage Loans whose terms call for the establishment of a lockbox account require that
231
the amounts paid to the property manager will be deposited into the applicable lockbox account on a regular basis. Lockbox accounts will not be assets of the issuing entity. See the footnotes to Annex A-1 for more information regarding lockbox provisions for the Mortgage Loans.
Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines
None of the Mortgage Loans were originated with material exceptions to the related mortgage loan seller’s underwriting guidelines. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers—UBS AG, New York Branch—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; “—Société Générale—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”; “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis”; “—CIBC Inc.—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”; and “—Barclays Bank PLC—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”.
Additional Indebtedness
General
The Mortgage Loans generally prohibit borrowers from incurring any additional debt secured by their Mortgaged Property without the consent of the lender. However:
● | substantially all of the Mortgage Loans permit the related borrower to incur limited indebtedness in the ordinary course of business that is not secured by the related Mortgaged Property; |
● | the borrowers under certain of the Mortgage Loans have incurred and/or may incur in the future unsecured debt other than in the ordinary course of business; |
● | any borrower that is not required pursuant to the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents to meet single purpose entity criteria may not be restricted from incurring unsecured debt or mezzanine debt; |
● | the terms of certain Mortgage Loans permit the borrowers to post letters of credit and/or surety bonds for the benefit of the mortgagee under the Mortgage Loans, which may constitute a contingent reimbursement obligation of the related borrower or an affiliate. The issuing bank or surety will not typically agree to subordination and standstill protection benefiting the mortgagee; |
● | although the Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on incurring mezzanine debt by the pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents generally permit, subject to certain limitations, the pledge of the limited partnership or non-managing membership equity interests in a borrower or less than a controlling interest of any other equity interests in a borrower; and |
● | certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of ownership interests in the borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in a borrower by imposing limitations on transfer of control or a specific percentage of ownership interests. |
232
Whole Loans
Certain Mortgage Loans are subject to the rights of a related Companion Loan holder, as further described in “—The Whole Loans” below.
Mezzanine Indebtedness
Although the Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on incurring mezzanine debt by the pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents generally permit, subject to certain limitations, the pledge of less than a controlling portion of the equity interests in a borrower or the pledge of limited partnership or non-managing membership equity interests in a borrower. Certain Mortgage Loans described below permit the incurrence of mezzanine debt subject to satisfaction of certain conditions including a certain maximum combined loan-to-value ratio and/or a minimum combined debt service coverage ratio. Also, certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of ownership interests in the related borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in a borrower by imposing limitations on transfer of control or a specific percentage of ownership interests. In addition, in general, a borrower (or its direct or indirect owners) that does not meet single-purpose entity criteria may not be restricted in any way from incurring mezzanine debt.
As of the Cut-off Date, each sponsor has informed us that it is aware of the following existing mezzanine indebtedness with respect to the Mortgage Loans it is selling to the depositor:
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Percentage of Initial Pool Balance | Mezzanine Debt Cut-off Date Balance | Subordinate Debt Cut-off Date Balance | Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Cut-off Date Total Debt Balance | Cut-off Date Wtd. Avg. Total Debt Interest Rate(1) | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | Total Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1) | Mortgage Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR | Total Debt Underwritten NCF DSCR(1) | |||||||||||
Tryad Industrial & Business Center | $56,440,256 | 5.4% | $19,500,000 | N/A | $53,942,899 | $129,883,155 | 5.88% | 52.6% | 61.8% | 1.42x | 1.09x | |||||||||||
Park Place at Florham Park | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $12,500,000 | N/A | $17,500,000 | $75,000,000 | 5.32% | 65.1% | 78.1% | 1.80x | 1.18x | |||||||||||
University Properties Portfolio | $34,500,000 | 3.3% | $5,000,000 | N/A | N/A | $39,500,000 | 5.58% | 58.8% | 67.3% | 1.95x | 1.43x | |||||||||||
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers(2) | $15,000,000 | 1.4% | $150,000,000 | $200,000,000 | $185,000,000 | $550,000,000 | 4.11% | 22.5% | 61.8% | 4.28x | 1.04x |
(1) | Calculated including the mezzanine debt and any related Companion Loan (including any related Subordinate Companion Loan). |
(2) | Includes a senior mezzanine loan in the amount of $105,000,000 and a junior mezzanine loan in the amount of $45,000,000 related to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan. |
In each case, the mezzanine indebtedness is coterminous with the related Mortgage Loan.
The mezzanine loans related to the Mortgage Loan identified in the table above secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Tryad Industrial & Business Center, Park Place at Florham Park, University Properties Portfolio and Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, collectively representing approximately 14.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, are each subject to an intercreditor agreement between the holder of the related mezzanine loan and the lender under the related Mortgage Loan that sets forth the relative priorities between the related Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan. Each related intercreditor agreement provides, among other things, generally that (a) all payments due under the related mezzanine loan are subordinate after receipt by the related mezzanine lender of
233
notice of an event of default under the related Mortgage Loan (taking into account the cure rights of the related mezzanine lender) to any and all payments required to be made under the related Mortgage Loan (except for any payments from funds other than the related Mortgaged Property or proceeds of any enforcement upon the mezzanine loan collateral and any mezzanine loan guarantees), (b) so long as there is no event of default under the related Mortgage Loan (taking into account the cure rights of the related mezzanine lender), the related mezzanine lender may accept payments on and, in certain cases, permitted prepayments or cure payments of the related mezzanine loan prior to the payment in full of the Mortgage Loan, (c) the related mezzanine lender will have certain rights to receive notice of and cure defaults under the related Mortgage Loan prior to any acceleration or enforcement of the related Mortgage Loan, (d) the related mezzanine lender may amend or modify the related mezzanine loan in certain respects without the consent of the related Mortgage Loan lender, and the Mortgage Loan lender must obtain the mezzanine lender’s consent to amend or modify the related Mortgage Loan in certain respects, (e) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the related mezzanine loan documents, the related mezzanine lender may foreclose upon the membership interests in the related Mortgage Loan borrower, which could result in a change of control with respect to the related Mortgage Loan borrower and a change in the management of the related Mortgaged Property, and (f) if the related Mortgage Loan is accelerated or, in some cases, becomes specially serviced or if the related Mortgage Loan borrower becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy or if an event of default occurs under the Mortgage Loan documents and the Mortgage Loan lender notifies the Mortgage Loan borrower of its intention to exercise (or, in some cases, actually exercises) its remedies against the real property collateral for the related Mortgage Loan the related mezzanine lender has the right to purchase the related Mortgage Loan, in whole but not in part, for a price generally equal to the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts due thereon, plus any unreimbursed servicing advances made by the related Mortgage Loan lender or its servicer and any interest thereon, and interest on any principal and interest advances made by the Mortgage Loan lender or its servicer, plus, subject to certain limitations, any Liquidation Fees and Special Servicing Fees payable under the PSA (net of certain amounts and subject to certain other limitations, each as specified in the related intercreditor agreement), and generally excluding any late charges, default interest, exit fees, spread maintenance charges payable in connection with a prepayment or yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums.
The Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations as described under “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—”Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions” above. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit the pledge by direct or indirect owners of the related borrower of equity distributions that may be made from time to time by the borrower to its equity owners.
With respect to the Mortgage Loans listed in the following chart, the direct and indirect equity owners of the borrower are permitted to incur future mezzanine debt, subject to the satisfaction of conditions contained in the related Mortgage Loan documents, including, among other things, a combined maximum loan-to-value ratio, a combined minimum debt
234
service coverage ratio and/or a combined minimum debt yield, as listed in the following chart and determined in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents:
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Maximum Principal Amount Permitted (If Specified)(1) | Combined Maximum LTV Ratio(2) | Combined Minimum DSCR(2) | Combined Minimum Debt Yield(2) | Intercreditor Agreement Required | Mortgage Lender Allowed to Require Rating Agency Confirmation(3) | |||||||||||||||
Harford Village MHC | $ | 23,500,000 | N/A | 75.0 | %(4) | 1.25 | x(5) | N/A | Yes | Yes(6) | ||||||||||||
Braemar Office Park(7) | $ | 21,800,000 | N/A | 73.2 | % | 1.65 | x | 9.89 | % | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||
Fortuna Center Plaza | $ | 13,500,000 | N/A | 75.0 | % | 1.30 | x | 9.0% | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
Tarzana Village(8) | $ | 11,800,000 | N/A | 53.9 | % | N/A | 8.65 | % | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
Holiday Inn Express Trinity | $ | 8,000,000 | N/A | 65.0 | % | 1.40 | x | 10.5 | % | Yes | Yes | |||||||||||
Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | $ | 7,000,000 | N/A | 62.5 | % | 1.35 | x | N/A | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||
Dollar General Winterset | $ | 945,000 | N/A | 85.0 | % | 1.20 | x | N/A | Yes | No | ||||||||||||
Dollar General Bay City | $ | 927,500 | N/A | 85.0 | % | 1.20 | x | N/A | Yes | No | ||||||||||||
Dollar General Rockford | $ | 896,000 | N/A | 85.0 | % | 1.20 | x | N/A | Yes | No |
(1) | Indicates the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan (if any) that is specifically stated in the Mortgage Loan documents and does not take account of any restrictions that may be imposed at any time by operation of any debt yield, debt service coverage ratio or loan-to-value ratio conditions. |
(2) | Debt service coverage ratios, loan-to-value ratios and debt yields are to be calculated in accordance with definitions set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. Except as otherwise noted in connection with a Mortgage Loan, the determination of the loan-to-value ratio must be, or may be required by the lender to be, based on a recent appraisal. |
(3) | Indicates whether the conditions to the financing include (a) delivery of, or the lender’s ability to request delivery of, Rating Agency Confirmation that the proposed financing will not, in and of itself, result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current rating assigned to any class of certificates and/or (b) acceptability of any related intercreditor or mezzanine loan documents to the Rating Agencies. |
(4) | The combined maximum LTV Ratio must not be greater than the lesser of 75.0% and the related loan-to-value ratio at origination, as determined by the lender. |
(5) | The combined minimum debt service coverage ratio must be equal to or greater than the greater of 1.25x and the related debt service coverage ratio at origination, as determined by the lender. |
(6) | If required under the PSA. |
(7) | Upon a sale of the Mortgaged Property and assumption of the Mortgage Loan in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents, the direct or indirect owners of the related borrower may obtain mezzanine financing, provided that the conditions as indicated above, among others are satisfied. |
(8) | The borrower may incur additional indebtedness, either by incurring future mezzanine debt as described in the chart above, or by obtaining other unsecured subordinate debt, provided that such subordinate debt is not secured by and does not result in a lien on the Mortgaged Property, and provided, further, that the LTV and Debt Yield tests described in the chart above are satisfied. |
The specific rights of the related mezzanine lender with respect to any such future mezzanine loan will be specified in the related intercreditor agreement and may include cure rights and a default-related purchase option. The intercreditor agreement required to be entered into in connection with any future mezzanine loan will either be substantially in the form attached to the related loan agreement or be subject to receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation or to the related lender’s approval. The direct and/or indirect owners of a borrower under a Mortgage Loan are also generally permitted to pledge their interest in such borrower as security for a mezzanine loan in circumstances where the ultimate transfer of such interest to the mezzanine lender would be a permitted transfer under the related Mortgage Loan documents.
Generally, upon a default under a mezzanine loan, subject to the terms of any applicable intercreditor or subordination agreement, the holder of the mezzanine loan would be entitled to foreclose upon the equity in the related borrower, which has been pledged to
235
secure payment of such debt. Although this transfer of equity may not trigger the due-on-sale clause under the related Mortgage Loan, it could cause a change in control of the borrower and/or cause the obligor under the mezzanine loan to file for bankruptcy, which could negatively affect the operation of the related Mortgaged Property and the related borrower’s ability to make payments on the related Mortgage Loan in a timely manner.
Other Secured Indebtedness
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion, representing approximately 1.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is subject to a first priority property-assessed clean energy loan (the “Pace Loan” ) in the original principal amount of $2,500,000, which matures in 2037, unless prepaid on an earlier date. Payments under the Pace Loan are due semi-annually and are deemed to be assessments that are billed to the borrower as a portion of real estate taxes assessed against the Mortgaged Property. The borrower is required under the Mortgage Loan documents to make monthly payments into a lender controlled reserved in an amount sufficient to cover the semi-annual installment payments due under the Pace Loan.
Some of the Mortgage Loans permit certain affiliates of the related borrower to pledge their indirect ownership interests in the borrower including, but not limited to, pledges to an institutional lender providing a corporate line of credit or corporate credit facility as collateral for such corporate line of credit or corporate credit facility. In connection with those pledges, the Mortgage Loan documents for such Mortgage Loans may: (i) contain limitations on the amounts that such collateral may secure and prohibit foreclosure of such pledges unless such foreclosure would represent a transfer otherwise permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents but do not prohibit a change in control in the event of a permitted foreclosure; or (ii) require that such financing be secured by all or substantially all of the pledgor’s assets or by at least a certain number of assets other than such ownership interests in the related borrower.
Preferred Equity
Because preferred equity often provides for a higher rate of return to be paid to the holders of such preferred equity, preferred equity in some respects functions like mezzanine indebtedness, and reduces a principal’s economic stake in the related Mortgaged Property, reduces cash flow on the borrower’s Mortgaged Property after the payment of debt service and payments on the preferred equity and may increase the likelihood that the owner of a borrower will permit the value or income-producing potential of a Mortgaged Property to fall and may create a risk that a borrower will default on the Mortgage Loan secured by a Mortgaged Property whose value or income is relatively weak.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Quakertown Shopping Center, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, Peaceable Street Capital LLC (“Peaceable Street”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, Peaceable Preferred Investor XIV(PA) LLC (“Peaceable”) contributed $3.1 million of equity to the borrower in connection with the acquisition of the Mortgaged Property in exchange for a an ownership interest that features a 10% preferred return. The equity is unsecured, distributions are required only to the extent of the borrower’s net cash flow and there is no date upon which the equity must be returned to Peaceable. The borrower sponsor and guarantor, Leo Ullman, indirectly through a subsidiary, Quakertown Manager, LLC (the “Managing Member”), retains day-to-day decision making authority for the borrower, although Peaceable has the right to approve certain major decisions. In certain circumstances (such as bad acts of the Managing Member), Peaceable may remove the
236
Managing Member as manager of the borrower or purchase the Managing Member’s interests in the borrower, in each case, without lender consent but subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the loan documents, including that Peaceable Street, an affiliate of Peaceable, is the new replacement guarantor. Peaceable Street has been pre-approved as a replacement guarantor, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions including that there is no material and adverse change with respect to Peaceable as of the date of the transfer. Peaceable also has a right of first refusal with respect to the Mortgaged Property in the event the borrower receives a written offer for the purchase of the Mortgaged Property that the Managing Member intends to accept, but such right is subject and subordinate to the mortgage and the other loan documents and will not apply in connection with a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure.
Other Unsecured Indebtedness
The Mortgage Loans generally permit a pledge of the same direct and indirect ownership interests in any borrower as may be transferred without the lender’s consent. See “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—”Due-on-Sale” and “Due-on-Encumbrance” Provisions” above.
With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as The Village at La Orilla, representing approximately 1.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property is subject to an industrial revenue bond structure pursuant to which a bond was issued in the maximum principal amount of $4,000,000 to be used in connection with the acquisition, improvement and equipping of the Mortgaged Property. See “—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations” above for more information.
In addition, the borrowers under some of the Mortgage Loans have incurred or are permitted to incur unsecured subordinate debt (in addition to trade payables, equipment financing and other debt incurred in the ordinary course) subject to the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents.
Prospective investors should assume that all or substantially all of the Mortgage Loans permit their borrowers to incur a limited amount (generally in an amount not more than 5% of the original Mortgage Loan balance or an amount otherwise normal and reasonable under the circumstances) of trade payables, equipment financing and/or other unsecured indebtedness in the ordinary course of business or an unsecured credit line to be used for working capital purposes. In addition, certain of the Mortgage Loans allow the related borrower to receive unsecured loans from equity owners, provided that such loans are subject to and subordinate to the applicable Mortgage Loan.
Certain risks relating to additional debt are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk”.
The Whole Loans
General
The Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolios of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, Tryad Industrial & Business Center, CrossPoint, Houston Distribution Center, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, BlueLinx Portfolio and Yorkshire & Lexington Towers are each part of a Whole Loan consisting of such Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loan(s). In connection with each Whole Loan, the rights between the trustee on behalf of the issuing entity and the holder(s) of the related Companion Loan(s) (the “Companion Holder” or “Companion
237
Holders”) are generally governed by an intercreditor agreement or a co-lender agreement (each, an “Intercreditor Agreement”). With respect to each of the Whole Loans, the related Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loan(s) are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
The following terms are used in reference to the Whole Loans:
“AB Whole Loan” means the Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans.
“BMARK 2018-B2 PSA” means the pooling and servicing agreement, dated and effective as of February 1, 2018, among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as depositor, KeyBank National Association, as master servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator and as trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as operating advisor and as asset representations reviewer.
“City Square and Clay Street PSA” means the pooling and servicing agreement relating to the securitization of the Controlling Companion Loan for the Whole Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as City Square and Clay Street.
“Companion Loan Rating Agency” means any NRSRO rating any serviced companion loan securities.
“Controlling Companion Loan” means, with respect to each Servicing Shift Whole Loan and the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, the related Pari Passu Companion Loan related to which, upon the securitization of such Pari Passu Companion Loan, servicing is expected to shift to the Servicing Shift PSA entered into in connection with such securitization. Société Générale or an affiliate is currently the holder of the “Controlling Companion Loan” with respect to the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan. Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. or an affiliate is currently the holder of the “Controlling Companion Loan” with respect to the CrossPoint Whole Loan. Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate thereof is currently the holder of the “Controlling Companion Loan” with respect to the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan.
“Control Appraisal Period” means, with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period.
“Control Note” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, the “Controlling Note” or other similar term specified in the related Intercreditor Agreement or the note held by the “Controlling Noteholder” or “Directing Holder” as specified in the related Intercreditor Agreement.
“Controlling Holder” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, the holder of the related Control Note. As of the Closing Date, the Controlling Holder with respect to each Whole Loan will be the holder listed next to the related Control Note in the column “Note Holder” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“CrossPoint PSA” means the pooling and servicing agreement relating to the securitization of the Controlling Companion Loan for the Whole Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint.
“Non-Control Note” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, any “Non-Controlling Note” or other similar term specified in the related Intercreditor Agreement or any related promissory note other than the related Control Note. As of the Closing Date, the Non-Control Notes with respect to each Whole Loan will be the promissory notes listed as the
238
“Non-Control Notes” in the column “Control Note/Non-Control Note” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“Non-Controlling Holder” means, with respect to any Whole Loan, the holder(s) of a Non-Control Note. As of the Closing Date, the Non-Controlling Holders with respect to each Whole Loan will be the holders listed next to the related Non-Control Notes in the column “Note Holder” in the table below titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes”.
“Non-Serviced AB Whole Loan” means the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan.
“Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator” means with respect to (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, prior to the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the certificate administrator under the UBS 2017-C7 PSA, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, the certificate administrator under the BMARK 2018-B2 PSA, (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the certificate administrator under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, and (iv) any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the certificate administrator under the related Servicing Shift PSA.
“Non-Serviced Companion Loan” means, with respect to each Non-Serviced Whole Loan, any promissory note that is a part of such Whole Loan other than the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
“Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder” means with respect to (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, prior to the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the directing certificateholder (or its equivalent) under the UBS 2017-C7 PSA, and after the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the directing holder under the related Servicing Shift PSA, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, the directing certificateholder (or its equivalent) under the directing holder under the BMARK 2018-B2 PSA, (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the directing certificateholder (or its equivalent) under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, and (iv) any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, on and after the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the directing certificateholder (or its equivalent) under the related Servicing Shift PSA.
“Non-Serviced Master Servicer” means with respect to (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, prior to the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the master servicer under the UBS 2017-C7 PSA, and after the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the master servicer under the related Servicing Shift PSA, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, the master servicer under the BMARK 2018-B2 PSA, (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the master servicer under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, and (iv) any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the applicable master servicer under the related Servicing Shift PSA.
“Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan” means each of (i) the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Mortgage Loan, and (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan. On and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan will be a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
“Non-Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan” means each of (i) the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan and (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Mortgage Loan. On and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan will be a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan.
“Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan” means each of the (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan and (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan. On and after the applicable Servicing Shift
239
Securitization Date, a Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be a Non-Serviced Whole Loan related to the issuing entity.
“Non-Serviced Securitization Trust” means a securitization trust that is created and governed by a Non-Serviced PSA.
“Non-Serviced PSA” means with respect to (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, prior to the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan the UBS 2017-C7 PSA, and after the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the related Servicing Shift PSA, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, the BMARK 2018-B2 PSA, (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA,, and (iv) any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the related Servicing Shift PSA.
“Non-Serviced Special Servicer” means with respect to (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, prior to the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the special servicer under the UBS 2017-C7 PSA, and after the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the special servicer under the related Servicing Shift PSA, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, the special servicer under the BMARK 2018-B2 PSA, (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the special servicer under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, and (iv) any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the applicable special servicer under the related Servicing Shift PSA.
“Non-Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan” means the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan.
“Non-Serviced Trustee” means with respect to (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, prior to the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the trustee under the UBS 2017-C7 PSA, and after the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan, the trustee under the related Servicing Shift PSA, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, the trustee under the BMARK 2018-B2 PSA, (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the trustee under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, and (iv) any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the applicable trustee under the related Servicing Shift PSA.
“Non-Serviced Whole Loan” means each of (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, (ii) the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan and (iii) the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan. On and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, a Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be a Non-Serviced Whole Loan related to the issuing entity.
“Pari Passu Mortgage Loan” means any of the Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loans or the Non-Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loans.
“Serviced Companion Loan” means each of the Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans. Prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, each of the CrossPoint Pari Passu Companion Loans and the City Square and Clay Street Pari Passu Companion Loans will be Serviced Companion Loans.
“Serviced Mortgage Loan” means each of (i) the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan, (ii) the Houston Distribution Center Mortgage Loan and (iii) the Park Place at Florham Park Mortgage Loan. Prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan will be a Serviced Mortgage Loan.
240
“Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan” means, with respect to each Serviced Whole Loan, any pari passu promissory note that is a part of such Whole Loan other than the Serviced Mortgage Loan.
“Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan” means each of (i) the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan, (ii) the Houston Distribution Center Mortgage Loan and (iii) the Park Place at Florham Park Mortgage Loan. Prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, each Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan will be a Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan.
“Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan” means each of (i) the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan, (ii) the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan and (iii) the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan. Prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, each Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan.
“Serviced Whole Loan” means each of (i) the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan, (ii) the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan and (iii) the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan. Prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, each Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be a Serviced Whole Loan.
“Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan” means, with respect to any Servicing Shift Whole Loan, a Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity that will be serviced under the PSA as of the Closing Date, but the servicing of which is expected to shift to the Servicing Shift PSA entered into in connection with the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date. As of the Closing Date, the CrossPoint Mortgage Loan and the City Square and Clay Street Mortgage Loan will each be a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan.
“Servicing Shift PSA” means the CrossPoint PSA and the City Square and Clay Street PSA.
“Servicing Shift Securitization Date” means, with respect to each Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the closing date of the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan.
“Servicing Shift Whole Loan” means any Whole Loan serviced under the PSA as of the Closing Date, which includes a related Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity and one or more Pari Passu Companion Loans not included in the issuing entity, but the servicing of which is expected to shift to the Servicing Shift PSA entered into in connection with the securitization of the related Controlling Companion Loan on and after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date. As of the Closing Date, the CrossPoint Whole Loan and the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan will each be a Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
“Subordinate Companion Loan” means the Non-Serviced Subordinate Companion Loans.
“UBS 2017-C7 PSA” means the pooling and servicing agreement, dated and effective as of December 1, 2017, among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, KeyBank National Association, as special servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as operating advisor and as asset representations reviewer. A Non-Control note with respect to the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan will be included in the UBS 2017-C7 securitization trust, and the UBS 2017-C7 PSA will govern the servicing of the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan until the related Controlling Companion Loan Securitization Date.
241
The table below provides certain information with respect to each Mortgage Loan that has a corresponding Companion Loan:
Whole Loan Summary
Mortgage Loan Name | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance | % of Initial Pool Balance | Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Subordinate Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance | Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2) | Whole Loan Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2)(3) | Mortgage Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(1) | Whole Loan Underwritten NCF DSCR(3) | ||||||||
AFIN Portfolio | $60,000,000 | 5.7% | $150,000,000 | N/A | 56.5% | 56.5% | 2.34x | 2.34x | ||||||||
Tryad Industrial & Business Center | $56,440,256 | 5.4% | $53,942,899 | N/A | 52.6% | 52.6% | 1.42x | 1.42x | ||||||||
CrossPoint | $50,000,000 | 4.8% | $100,000,000 | N/A | 60.0% | 60.0% | 2.24x | 2.24x | ||||||||
Houston Distribution Center | $49,000,000 | 4.7% | $35,000,000 | N/A | 58.3% | 58.3% | 1.44x | 1.44x | ||||||||
Park
Place at Florham Park | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $17,500,000 | N/A | 65.1% | 65.1% | 1.80x | 1.80x | ||||||||
City Square and Clay Street | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | $45,000,000 | N/A | 49.7% | 49.7% | 1.76x | 1.76x | ||||||||
BlueLinx Portfolio | $28,600,000 | 2.7% | $42,900,000 | N/A | 64.2% | 64.2% | 2.46x | 2.46x | ||||||||
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | $15,000,000 | 1.4% | $185,000,000 | $200,000,000 | 22.5% | 44.9% | 4.28x | 1.68x |
(1) | Calculated including any related Companion Loans but excluding any related Subordinate Companion Loan and any mezzanine debt. |
(2) | With respect to those mortgage loans identified under “—Appraised Value”, the indicated loan-to-value ratio has been based on an other than “as-is” appraised value. |
(3) | Calculated including any related Companion Loans and any related Subordinate Companion Loan but excluding any mezzanine debt. |
Set forth below is the identity of the initial Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder (or equivalent entity) for each Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the securitization trust or other entity holding the Control Note in such Non-Serviced Whole Loan and the related Non-Serviced PSA under which it is being serviced.
Whole Loan(1) |
Non-Serviced PSA |
Controlling Noteholder |
Initial Directing Certificateholder(2) |
AFIN Portfolio | UBS 2017-C7(3) | UBS 2017-C7(3) | Prime Finance CMBS B-Piece Holdco XV, LP |
BlueLinx Portfolio | BMARK 2018-B2(4) | BMARK 2018-B2(4) | Barings LLC(4) |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | CSAIL 2017-CX10 | CSAIL 2017-CX10 | Eightfold Real Estate Capital Fund V, L.P. |
(1) | Does not include the CrossPoint Whole Loan or the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan, servicing for which will be transferred on the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date. The initial controlling noteholder of the CrossPoint Whole Loan will be Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. or an affiliate thereof, as holder of the related Controlling Companion Loan. The initial controlling noteholder for the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan will be Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate thereof, as holder of the related Controlling Companion Loan. With respect to each such Whole Loan, on and after the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the controlling noteholder of such Whole Loan will be the securitization trust into which the related Controlling Companion Loan is deposited. The initial directing certificateholder on and after such Servicing Shift Securitization Date is expected to be the controlling class representative or other directing certificateholder under the securitization into which the related Controlling Companion Loan was deposited. |
(2) | As of the closing date of the related securitization. |
(3) | After the securitization of the related controlling pari passu companion loan, the related whole loan will be serviced under the related pooling and servicing agreement for that securitization transaction (and by the service provider parties thereto). |
(4) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan will be subject to the pooling and servicing agreement governing the BMARK 2018-B2 securitization which is expected to close contemporaneously with the UBS 2018-C8 securitization. |
See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Certificateholder and the Companion Holders”.
242
Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes
Mortgage Loan | Note Name | Control Note/ Non-Control Note | Note Cut-off Date Balance(1) | Note Holder(1) |
AFIN Portfolio | Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 Note A-4 Note A-5 Note A-6 Note A-7 Note A-8 Note A-9 Note A-10 Note A-11 Note A-12 Note A-13 Note A-14 Note A-15 Note A-16 |
Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$25,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 |
UBS 2018-C8 Société Générale UBS 2017-C7 UBS 2017-C7 UBS 2018-C8 Société Générale Société Générale Société Générale UBS 2017-C7 UBS 2018-C8 UBS AG, New York Branch UBS AG, New York Branch UBS AG, New York Branch UBS 2017-C7 UBS 2018-C8 UBS AG, New York Branch |
Tryad Industrial & Business Center | Note A-1-1 Note A-1-2 Note A-1-3 Note A-1-4 Note A-2-1 Note A-2-2 Note A-2-3 Note A-2-4 |
Non-Control Note Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$26,971,450 $12,986,254 $9,989,426 $5,244,449 $26,971,450 $12,986,254 $9,989,426 $5,244,449 |
UBS 2017-C7 UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2017-C7 UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 |
CrossPoint |
Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 Note A-4 Note A-5 Note A-6 Note A-7 Note A-8 Note A-9 Note A-10 |
Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 |
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. Starwood Mortgage Capital LLC Starwood Mortgage Capital LLC Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. UBS 2018-C8 Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. |
Houston Distribution Center | Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 |
Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$35,000,000 $14,000,000 $35,000,000 |
UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 Barclays Bank PLC |
Park Place at Florham Park | Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 Note A-4 Note A-5 |
Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$30,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $7,500,000 $5,000,000 |
UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 UBS AG, New York Branch UBS AG, New York Branch UBS 2018-C8 |
City Square and Clay Street |
Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 Note A-4 |
Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$30,000,000 $25,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 |
Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate UBS 2018-C8 Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate UBS 2018-C8 |
243
Mortgage Loan | Note Name | Control Note/ Non-Control Note | Note Cut-off Date Balance(1) | Note Holder(1) |
BlueLinx Portfolio | Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 Note A-4 |
Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note |
$30,000,000 $12,900,000 $18,600,000 $10,000,000 |
BMARK 2018-B2 BMARK 2018-B2 UBS 2018-C8 UBS 2018-C8 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | Note A-1 Note A-2 Note A-3 Note A-4 Note A-5 Note A-6 Note A-7 Note A-8-1 Note A-8-2 Note B |
Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Non-Control Note Control Note |
$40,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $200,000,000 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 CSAIL 2017-CX10 Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC UBS 2017-C5 UBS 2017-C6 CCUBS 2017-C1 UBS 2018-C8 CCUBS 2017-C1 UBS 2018-C8 CSAIL 2017-CX10 |
(1) | The lender provides no assurances that any non-securitized notes will not be split further and/or reissued with reallocated balances. |
(1) | Currently held by Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., the BMARK 2018-B2 securitization transaction is scheduled to close on or about February 27, 2018. |
The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans
The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans will be serviced pursuant to the PSA in accordance with the terms of the PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement. None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will be required to make a monthly payment advance on any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, but the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be required to (and the special servicer, at its option in emergency situations, may) make Servicing Advances on the Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans unless such advancing party (or, even if it is not the advancing party, the special servicer) determines that such a Servicing Advance would be a Nonrecoverable Advance.
Each Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the PSA (and, accordingly, will be a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan) prior to the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, after which such Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the Non-Serviced PSA (and, accordingly, will be a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan). With respect to each Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the discussion under this section only applies to the period prior to the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
Intercreditor Agreement
The Intercreditor Agreement related to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan provides that:
● | The promissory notes comprising such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (and consequently, the related Serviced Mortgage Loan and each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) are of equal priority with each other and none of such promissory notes (or mortgage loans) will have priority or preference over any other such promissory note (or mortgage loan). |
● | All payments, proceeds and other recoveries on the Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be applied to the promissory notes comprising such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan on a pro rata and pari passu basis (subject, in each case, to (a) the allocation of certain amounts to escrows and reserves, certain repairs or |
244
restorations or payments to the applicable borrower required by the Mortgage Loan documents and (b) certain payment and reimbursement rights of the parties to the PSA, in accordance with the terms of the PSA). |
● | The transfer of up to 49% of the beneficial interest of a promissory note comprising the Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is generally permitted. The transfer of more than 49% of the beneficial interest of any such promissory note is generally prohibited unless (i) the transferee is a large institutional lender or investment fund (other than a related borrower or an affiliate thereof) that satisfies minimum net worth and/or experience requirements or certain securitization vehicles that satisfy certain ratings and other requirements or (ii)(a) each non-transferring holder has consented to such transfer (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld), and (b) if any such non-transferring holder’s interest in the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is held in a securitization, a rating agency communication is provided to each applicable rating agency (or, in certain cases, a rating agency confirmation is obtained from each applicable rating agency). The foregoing restrictions do not apply to a sale of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan together with the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans in accordance with the terms of the PSA. |
With respect to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, certain fees, costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of a Servicing Advance) allocable to a related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the Mortgage Pool, subject to the Trust’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or from general collections with respect to any securitization of such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
Control Rights with respect to Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans Other Than The Servicing Shift Whole Loans
With respect to any Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (other than a Servicing Shift Whole Loan), the related Control Note will be included in the Trust, and the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class will have certain consent rights (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event) and consultation rights (after the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) with respect to such Whole Loan as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder”.
Control Rights with respect to The Servicing Shift Whole Loans
With respect to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan prior to the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the related Control Note will be held as of the Closing Date by the Controlling Holder listed in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” above under “—General”. The related Controlling Holder will be entitled (i) to direct the servicing of such Whole Loan in a manner that is substantially similar to the rights of the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class under the PSA, (ii) to consent to certain servicing decisions in respect of such Whole Loan and actions set forth in a related asset status report and (iii) to replace the special servicer with respect to such Whole Loan with or without cause; provided that with respect to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan, in general, neither the related borrower nor an affiliate thereof will be entitled to exercise the rights of such “Controlling Holder” under the related Intercreditor Agreement.
245
Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder
With respect to each Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, the holder of any related Non-Control Note (or if such Non-Control Note has been securitized, the directing certificateholder (or equivalent party) with respect to such securitization or other designated party under the related pooling and servicing agreement) will be entitled to certain consultation rights described below; provided that, in general, neither the related borrower nor an affiliate thereof will be entitled to exercise the rights of a Non-Controlling Holder under the related Intercreditor Agreement with respect to such Non-Control Note. With respect to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan, one or more related Non-Control Notes will be included in the Trust, and the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, or the operating advisor (consistent with the Operating Advisor Standard), following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, will be entitled to exercise the consultation rights described below.
The special servicer will be required (i) to provide to each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative copies of any notice, information and report that it is required to provide to the Directing Certificateholder with respect to the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an Asset Status Report relating to such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any proposed action to be taken in respect of a Major Decision with respect to such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (for this purpose, without regard to whether such items are actually required to be provided to the Directing Certificateholder due to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event or Consultation Termination Event) and (ii) to use reasonable efforts to consult each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative on a strictly non-binding basis (to the extent such party requests consultation after having received the aforementioned notices, information and reports) with respect to any such recommended actions outlined in an Asset Status Report by the special servicer or any proposed action to be taken by the special servicer in respect of such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan that constitutes a Major Decision.
Such consultation right will expire ten (10) business days after the delivery to such Non-Controlling Holder of written notice of a proposed action (together with copies of the notices, information and reports required to be delivered thereto) (unless the special servicer proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the action previously proposed, in which case such ten (10) business day period will be deemed to begin anew). In no event will the special servicer be obligated to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by any Non-Controlling Holder (or its representative). In addition, if the special servicer determines that immediate action is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the promissory notes comprising a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, it may take, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, any action constituting a Major Decision with respect to such Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any action set forth in any applicable Asset Status Report before the expiration of the aforementioned ten (10) business day period.
In addition to the aforementioned consultation right, each Non-Controlling Holder will have the right to annual meetings (which may be held telephonically) with the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan are discussed.
If a Servicer Termination Event has occurred with respect to the special servicer that affects a Non-Controlling Holder, such holder will have the right to direct the trustee to terminate the special servicer under the PSA solely with respect to the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, other than with respect to any rights such special servicer may have as a
246
Certificateholder, entitlements to amounts payable to such special servicer at the time of termination, entitlements to indemnification amounts and any other entitlements of the terminated party that survive the termination.
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan
If any Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan, and if the special servicer decides to sell the related Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan, such special servicer will be required to sell such Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan together as interests evidencing one whole loan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such special servicer will not be permitted to sell a Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan without the consent of each Non-Controlling Holder unless it has delivered to such holder (a) at least fifteen (15) business days prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the related Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, (b) at least ten (10) days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any amendments to such bid packages) received by such special servicer in connection with any such proposed sale, a copy of the most recent appraisal and certain other supplementary documents (if requested by such holder), and (c) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the Directing Certificateholder) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and documents being provided to offerors or otherwise approved by the master servicer or special servicer in connection with the proposed sale.
The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans
Each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA in accordance with the terms of such Non-Serviced PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement. No Non-Serviced Master Servicer, Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Trustee will be required to make monthly payment advances on a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, but the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Trustee, as applicable, will be required to (and the Non-Serviced Special Servicer, at its option in certain cases, may) make servicing advances on the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan in accordance with the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA unless such advancing party (or, in certain cases, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer, even if it is not the advancing party) determines that such a servicing advance would be a nonrecoverable advance. Monthly payment advances on each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be made by the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, to the extent provided under the PSA. None of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will be obligated to make servicing advances with respect to a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” for a description of the servicing terms of the Non-Serviced PSAs.
With respect to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the discussion under this “—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” section only applies to the period on or after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
Intercreditor Agreement
The Intercreditor Agreement related to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan provides that:
● | The promissory notes comprising such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (and consequently, the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and each related Non-Serviced Companion Loan) are of equal priority with each other and none of such |
247
promissory notes (or mortgage loans) will have priority or preference over any other such promissory note (or mortgage loan). |
● | All payments, proceeds and other recoveries on the Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan will be applied to the promissory notes comprising such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan on a pro rata and pari passu basis (subject, in each case, to (a) the allocation of certain amounts to escrows and reserves, certain repairs or restorations or payments to the applicable borrower required by the Mortgage Loan documents and (b) certain payment and reimbursement rights of the parties to the related Non-Serviced PSA, in accordance with the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA); provided that in connection with the Bass Pro & Cabela’s Whole Loan, certain payments of principal that are allocated to the A-3 Notes in the aggregate will not be allocated among the individual A-3 Notes on a pro rata and pari passu basis, but instead will generally be allocated in the manner set forth in the mortgage loan documents, and are described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments”. |
● | The transfer of up to 49% of the beneficial interest of a promissory note comprising the Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is generally permitted. The transfer of more than 49% of the beneficial interest of any such promissory note is generally prohibited unless (i) the transferee is a large institutional lender or investment fund (other than a related borrower or an affiliate thereof) that satisfies minimum net worth and/or experience requirements or certain securitization vehicles that satisfy certain ratings and other requirements or (ii)(a) each non-transferring holder has consented to such transfer (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld), and (b) if any such non-transferring holder’s interest in the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan is held in a securitization, a rating agency communication is provided to each applicable rating agency (or, in certain cases, a rating agency confirmation is obtained from each applicable rating agency). The foregoing restrictions do not apply to a sale of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan together with the related Non-Serviced Companion Loans in accordance with the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA. |
Any losses, liabilities, claims, fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan that are not otherwise paid out of collections on such Whole Loan may, to the extent allocable to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, be payable or reimbursable out of general collections on the mortgage pool for this securitization.
Control Rights
With respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (other than Servicing Shift Whole Loans on or after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date), the related Control Note will be held as of the Closing Date by the Controlling Holder listed in the table titled “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” above under “—General”. The related Controlling Holder (or a designated representative) will be entitled (i) to direct the servicing of such Whole Loan in a manner that is substantially similar to the rights of the directing certificateholder (or equivalent party) under the related Non-Serviced PSA, (ii) to consent to certain servicing decisions in respect of such Whole Loan and actions set forth in a related asset status report and (iii) to replace the special servicer with respect to such Whole Loan with or without cause; provided that with respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, in general, neither the related borrower nor an affiliate thereof will be
248
entitled to exercise the rights of the “Controlling Holder” under the related Intercreditor Agreement.
Certain Rights of each Non-Controlling Holder
With respect to any Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, the holder of any related Non-Control Note (or if such Non-Control Note has been securitized, the directing certificateholder with respect to such securitization (or other designated party under the related pooling and servicing agreement)) will be entitled to certain consent and consultation rights described below; provided, that, in general, neither the related borrower nor an affiliate thereof will be entitled to exercise the rights of a Non-Controlling Holder with respect to such Non-Control Note under the related Intercreditor Agreement. With respect to each Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (including a Servicing Shift Whole Loan after the applicable Servicing Shift Securitization Date), one or more related Non-Control Notes will be included in the Trust, and the Directing Certificateholder, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, or the operating advisor (consistent with the Servicing Standard), following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, will be entitled to exercise the consent or consultation rights described below.
With respect to any Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable pursuant to the related Intercreditor Agreement, will be required (i) to provide to each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative copies of any notice, information and report that it is required to provide to the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder under the related Non-Serviced PSA with respect to the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any proposed action to be taken in respect of a major decision under the related Non-Serviced PSA with respect to such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (for this purpose, without regard to whether such items are actually required to be provided to the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder due to the occurrence and continuance of a “control termination event” or a “consultation termination event” (or analogous concepts) under such Non-Serviced PSA) and (ii) to consult (or to use reasonable efforts to consult) each Non-Controlling Holder or its representative on a strictly non-binding basis (to the extent such party requests consultation after having received the aforementioned notices, information and reports) with respect to any such recommended actions outlined in an asset status report by such Non-Serviced Special Servicer or any proposed action to be taken by such Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, in respect of the applicable major decision.
Such consultation right will generally expire ten (10) business days after the delivery to such Non-Controlling Holder of written notice of a proposed action (together with copies of the notices, information and reports required to be delivered thereto), whether or not such Non-Controlling Holder has responded within such period (unless the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the action previously proposed, in which case such ten (10) business day period will be deemed to begin anew). In no event will the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, be obligated to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by any Non-Controlling Holder (or its representative).
If the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, determines that immediate action is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the promissory notes comprising a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, it may
249
take, in accordance with the servicing standard under the Non-Serviced PSA, any action constituting a major decision with respect to such Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan or any action set forth in any applicable asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned typical ten (10) business day period.
In addition to the aforementioned consultation right, each Non-Controlling Holder will have the right to annual meetings (which may be held telephonically) with the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to such Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan are discussed.
If a special servicer termination event under the related Non-Serviced PSA has occurred that affects a Non-Controlling Holder, such holder will have the right to direct the related Non-Serviced Trustee to terminate the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under such Non-Serviced PSA solely with respect to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, other than with respect to any rights such Non-Serviced Special Servicer may have as a certificateholder under such Non-Serviced PSA, entitlements to amounts payable to such Non-Serviced Special Servicer at the time of termination, entitlements to indemnification amounts and any other entitlements of the terminated party that survive the termination.
Custody of the Mortgage File
The Non-Serviced Custodian is the custodian of the mortgage file related to the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan (other than any promissory notes not contributed to the related Non-Serviced Securitization Trust).
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan
If any Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan, and if the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer decides to sell the related Control Note contributed to the Non-Serviced Securitization Trust, such Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be required to sell the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and each Non-Serviced Companion Loan together as interests evidencing one whole loan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell a Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan without the consent of each Non-Controlling Holder unless it has delivered to such holder (a) at least fifteen (15) business days prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan, (b) at least ten (10) days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any amendments to such bid packages) received by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale, a copy of the most recent appraisal and certain other supplementary documents (if requested by such holder), and (c) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the applicable Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder under the related Non-Serviced PSA) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and documents being provided to offerors or otherwise approved by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale.
250
The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan
General
The Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Yorkshire & Lexington Towers, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, with a Cut-off Date Balance of $15,000,000 (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan”), is part of a whole loan comprised of ten promissory notes, each of which is secured by the same mortgage instrument on the same underlying Mortgaged Properties (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties”). The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan is evidenced by promissory note A-7 and promissory note A-8-2. The portion of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan (as defined below) evidenced by (i) promissory note A-1, with an original principal balance of $40,000,000 (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan”) and promissory note A-2, with an original principal balance of $20,000,000, which were contributed to the CSAIL 2017-CX10 securitization trust, (ii) promissory note A-3, with an original principal balance of $20,000,000, which is currently held by Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC and is expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization trusts, (iii) promissory note A-4, with an original principal balance of $40,000,000, which was contributed to the UBS 2017-C5 securitization trust, (iv) promissory notes A-6 and A-8-1, with an aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of $25,000,000, which were contributed to the CCUBS 2017-C1 securitization trust and (v) promissory note A-5, with an original principal balance of $40,000,000 (together with promissory notes A-2, A-3, A-4, A-6 and A-8-1, the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Non-Lead Pari Passu Companion Loans”) and together with the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans”), which was contributed to the UBS 2017-C6 securitization trust. The portion of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan (as defined below) evidenced by promissory Note B, with a Cut-off Date Balance of $200,000,000, which is held by the CSAIL 2017-CX10 securitization trust is referred to in this prospectus as the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan” and is subordinate in right of payment with the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans. The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan was contributed to the CSAIL 2017-CX10 securitization trust. The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Senior Loan” and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Senior Loan, together with the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan, are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan”. The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan will not be transferred to the issuing entity and will not be part of the Mortgage Pool.
The holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Noteholders”) have entered into a co-lender agreement that sets forth the respective rights of each Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Noteholder (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement”).
Servicing
The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan was included in the CSAIL 2017-CX10 securitization trust (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan Securitization”). The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan is being
251
serviced by KeyBank National Association, as master servicer (the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Master Servicer”), and specially serviced by CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer (the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Special Servicer”), pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement dated as of November 1, 2017 (the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA”), among Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as depositor (the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Depositor”), the CSAIL 2017-CX10 Master Servicer, the CSAIL 2017-CX10 Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (in such capacity, the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Trustee”) and as certificate administrator and custodian (in such capacity, the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Certificate Administrator”), and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor (in such capacity, the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Operating Advisor”) and as asset representations reviewer (in such capacity, the “CSAIL 2017-CX10 Asset Representations Reviewer”) in connection with the CSAIL 2017-CX10 Commercial Mortgage Trust (into which the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loan evidenced by promissory note A-2 was deposited) and subject to the terms of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement.
In servicing the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the servicing standard set forth in the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA will require the applicable master servicer and the applicable special servicer to take into account the interests, as a collective whole, of the certificateholders as the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans and the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan (taking into account the subordinate nature of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan).
For so long as the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder holding greater than 50% of the aggregate principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan (the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Controlling Subordinate Companion Noteholder”) is the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder (as defined below), the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Controlling Subordinate Companion Noteholder will have the right to approve certain modifications and consent to certain actions to be taken with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, as more fully described below. Furthermore, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder will have the right to cure certain defaults by the related borrower, as more fully described below.
Advances
The master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be responsible for making P&I Advances on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan (but not on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans) pursuant to the PSA, in each case, unless the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, determines that such an Advance would be a Nonrecoverable Advance.
The applicable master servicer or trustee will be obligated to make servicing advances with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, in each case unless a determination of nonrecoverability is made under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA.
Distributions
Pursuant to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, prior to the occurrence and continuance of (i) an event of default with respect to an obligation to pay money due under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, (ii) any other event of default for which the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan is accelerated, (iii) any
252
other event of default which causes the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan to become a Specially Serviced Loan or (iv) any bankruptcy or insolvency event that constitutes an event of default (each, a “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Sequential Pay Event”) (or, if such a default has occurred, but has been cured by the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder or the default cure period has not yet expired and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder is diligently exercising its cure rights under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement), after payment of amounts for required reserves or escrows required by the mortgage loan documents and amounts payable or reimbursable with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan (including any penalty charges) under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA to the applicable master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator or the trustee, payments and proceeds received with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan will generally be applied in the following order:
First, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans, in an amount equal to the interest then due and payable on the outstanding principal of their respective notes at their net interest rate;
Second, (i) to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis in an amount equal to their respective percentage interests in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan of principal payments received, if any, until their respective principal balances have been reduced to zero and (ii) with respect to any insurance and condemnation proceeds payable as principal to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan pursuant to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, 100% of such insurance and condemnation proceeds will be distributed to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis until their respective principal balances have been reduced to zero;
Third, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans up to the amount of any unreimbursed costs and expenses paid by the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and for any of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans, including any recovered costs not previously reimbursed to such holders (or paid or advanced by the master servicer or the special servicer on their behalf and not previously paid or reimbursed);
Fourth, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis in an amount equal to the aggregate of any prepayment premium payable to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans to the extent paid by the related borrower;
Fifth, if as a result of a workout, the balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan or Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans has been reduced, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans in an amount up to the reduction of the principal balances of their respective notes as a result of such workout, plus interest on such amount at the applicable net interest rate;
253
Sixth, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan in an amount equal to the interest then due and payable on the outstanding principal of its note at its net interest rate;
Seventh, (i) to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan in an amount equal to its respective percentage interest in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan of principal payments received, if any, until the principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan is reduced to zero and (ii) with respect to any insurance and condemnation proceeds payable as principal to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan pursuant to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, the portion of such insurance and condemnation proceeds remaining after distribution to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans pursuant to clause (second) above will be distributed to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan until its principal balance has been reduced to zero;
Eighth, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan in an amount equal to any prepayment premium payable on its note to the extent paid by the related borrower;
Ninth, to the extent the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder has made any payments or advances to cure defaults pursuant to “—Cure Rights” below, to reimburse the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder for all such cure payments;
Tenth, if the proceeds of any foreclosure sale or any liquidation of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan or the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties exceed the amounts required to be applied in accordance with the foregoing clauses (first)-(ninth) and, as a result of a workout, the balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan has been reduced, to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder in an amount up to the reduction, if any, of the principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan as a result of such workout, plus interest on such amount at the applicable net interest rate;
Eleventh, to the extent assumption or transfer fees actually paid by the related borrower are not required to be otherwise applied under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, including, without limitation, to provide reimbursement for interest on any Advances, to pay any additional servicing expenses or to compensate any master servicer or applicable special servicer (in each case provided that such reimbursements or payments relate to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan or the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties), any such assumption or transfer fees, to the extent actually paid by the borrower, will be required to be paid to the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholders and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder, pro rata, based on their respective percentage interests in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan; and
Lastly, if any excess amount is available to be distributed in respect of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, and not otherwise applied in accordance with the foregoing clauses (first)-(eleventh), any remaining amount is required to be paid to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate
254
Companion Loan, pro rata based on their respective initial percentage interests in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan.
Following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Sequential Pay Event, after payment of all amounts for required reserves or escrows required by the mortgage loan documents and amounts then payable or reimbursable to the applicable master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator or the trustee under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, payments and proceeds with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan will generally be applied in the following order, in each case to the extent of available funds:
First, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans in an amount equal to the interest then due and payable on the outstanding principal of their respective notes, in each case, at their net interest rate;
Second, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis in an amount equal to the principal balances of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans until their principal balances have been reduced to zero;
Third, the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans up to the amount of any unreimbursed costs and expenses paid by each holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans, including any recovered costs not previously reimbursed to such holder (or paid or advanced by the master servicer or the special servicer on their behalf and not previously paid or reimbursed);
Fourth, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis in an amount equal to the aggregate of any prepayment premium payable on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans to the extent paid by the related borrower;
Fifth, if as the result of a workout, the principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan or the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans has been reduced, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans in an amount up to the reduction of the principal balances of their respective notes as a result of such workout, plus interest on such amount at the applicable net interest rate;
Sixth, to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder in an amount equal to the interest then due and payable on the outstanding principal of its note at its net interest rate;
Seventh, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan in an amount equal to the outstanding principal balance of its note until its principal balance has been reduced to zero;
Eighth, to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan in an amount equal to any prepayment premium payable on its note to the extent paid by the related borrower;
255
Ninth, to the extent the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder has made any payments or advances to cure defaults pursuant to “—Cure Rights” below, to reimburse the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholders for all such cure payments;
Tenth, if the proceeds of any foreclosure sale or any liquidation of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan or Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties exceed the amounts required to be applied in accordance with the foregoing (first)-(ninth) and, as a result of a workout, the balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan has been reduced, to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholders in an amount up to the reduction, if any, of the principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan as a result of such workout, plus interest on such amount at the applicable interest rate;
Eleventh, to the extent assumption or transfer fees actually paid by the related borrower are not required to be otherwise applied under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, including, without limitation, to provide reimbursement for interest on any Advances, to pay any additional servicing expenses or to compensate any master servicer or applicable special servicer (in each case provided that such reimbursements or payments relate to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan or the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties), any such assumption or transfer fees, to the extent actually paid by the borrower, will be required to be paid to the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholders and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholders, pro rata, based on their respective percentage interests in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan; and
Lastly, if any excess amount is available to be distributed in respect of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, and not otherwise applied in accordance with the foregoing clauses (first)-(eleventh), any remaining amount is required to be paid to the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan, pro rata, based on their respective initial percentage interests in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a P&I Advance is made with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan pursuant to the terms of the PSA, then that P&I Advance, together with interest on that P&I Advance, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”, out of future payments and collections on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans or any loans included in any future securitization trust related to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans.
Certain costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of any related Servicing Advances) allocable to a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loan or the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, as applicable, may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the Mortgage Pool, subject to the issuing entity’s right, if any, to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans or from general collections of the securitization trusts holding the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans. This may result in temporary (or, if not ultimately reimbursed, permanent) shortfalls to the holders of the Certificates.
256
Consultation and Control
The controlling noteholder under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement will be the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan, which will initially be Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC, and from and after the date of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan Securitization Date is expected to be the controlling class representative or such other party specified in the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA (such party, the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder”). Each non-controlling noteholder under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement is referred to herein as a “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Non-Directing Holder”). In its capacity as the controlling noteholder under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, prior to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan Securitization Date, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Directing Holder will be entitled to exercise rights similar to the rights of the Directing Certificateholder as set forth under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Certificateholder” with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan and from and after the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan Securitization Date, the rights of the directing certificateholder as set forth under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA.
No objection, direction or advice of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Directing Holder contemplated above may require or cause the applicable master servicer or special servicer to violate any provisions of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan documents, applicable law, the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, the REMIC provisions or the applicable master servicer’s or special servicer’s obligation to act in accordance with the servicing standard or expose the applicable master servicer or special servicer to liability, or materially expand the scope of the applicable master servicer’s or the special servicer’s responsibilities under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA.
Pursuant to the terms of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, each Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Non-Directing Holder will have (i) the right to receive copies of all notices, information and reports, in each case, with respect to any Yorkshire & Lexington Towers major decisions or the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, that the applicable master servicer or special servicer is required to provide to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Directing Holder under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, as applicable, within the same time frame that the applicable master servicer or special servicer is required to provide such notices, information and reports to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Directing Holder (but without regard to whether or not the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Directing Holder actually has lost any rights to receive such information as a result of a consultation termination event), (ii) the right to be consulted by the applicable master servicer or special servicer on a strictly nonbinding basis with respect to certain Yorkshire & Lexington Towers major decisions as set forth in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement and the implementation applicable special servicer of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report and (iii) the right to annual conference calls with the applicable master servicer or special servicer upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the applicable master servicer or special servicer for the purpose of discussing servicing issues related to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan.
The consultation rights described above will expire ten (10) business days following the delivery by the applicable master servicer or special servicer of notice and information relating to the matter subject to consultation; provided that if a new course of action is proposed that is materially different from the actions previously proposed, the ten (10) business day consultation period will begin anew. Notwithstanding the consultation rights
257
described above, the applicable master servicer or special servicer will be permitted to implement any major decision or any action set forth in an asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned ten (10) business-day period if it determines that immediate action with respect to such decision is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans. Neither the applicable master servicer or special servicer will be obligated at any time to follow or take any alternative actions recommended in the course of such consultations.
The consultation rights of the issuing entity as holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan will be exercisable by the Directing Certificateholder for so long as a Consultation Termination Event has not occurred and is continuing and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan is not an Excluded Loan.
The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder
Pursuant to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, as of any date of determination, will be:
● | the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Controlling Subordinate Companion Noteholder, unless a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period has occurred and is continuing; and |
● | the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan or its designee if a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period has occurred and is continuing. |
After the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan Securitization Date at any time the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan is the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder, the rights of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Directing Holder may be exercised by the holders of the majority of the class of securities designated as the “controlling class,” to the extent provided in the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA.
A “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period” will mean a period that exists with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan, if and for so long as: (a)(i) the initial unpaid principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan minus (ii) the sum (without duplication) of (x) any payments of principal (whether as principal prepayments or otherwise) allocated to, and received on, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan, (y) any Appraisal Reduction Amount for the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan that is allocated to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan and (z) any losses realized with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties or the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan that are allocated to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan, is less than (b) 25% of the of the remainder of the (i) initial unpaid principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan less (ii) any payments of principal (whether as principal prepayments or otherwise) allocated to, and received by, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholders.
The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Controlling Subordinate Companion Noteholders are entitled to avoid its applicable Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period caused by the application of an Appraisal Reduction Amount (as opposed to a Yorkshire & Lexington
258
Towers Control Appraisal Period that is deemed to have occurred as a result of any borrower related party holding an interest in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan or the existence of any circumstances that would otherwise permit any borrower related party to exercise the rights of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan as Directing Holder) upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including without limitation, delivery of additional collateral in the form of either (x) cash collateral acceptable to the master servicer or the special servicer or (y) an unconditional and irrevocable standby letter of credit issued by a bank or other financial institution in a form acceptable to the master servicer or special servicer that meets the rating requirements as described in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement (either (x) or (y), the “Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Threshold Event Collateral”) in an amount that, when added to the appraised value of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties as used to calculate any Appraisal Reduction Amount for the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan pursuant to the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA would reduce such Appraisal Reduction Amount enough to cause the applicable Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period not to exist.
Cure Rights
In the event that the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers borrower fails to make any payment of a liquidated sum of money due on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan that results in a monetary event of default or the borrower otherwise defaults with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder will have the right to cure such event of default subject to certain limitations set forth in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement. The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder will be limited to, in the aggregate, six (6) cure payments over the life of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, and, with respect to monetary events of default, no more than three (3) of which may be consecutive. So long as the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder is permitted to make a cure payment with respect to a non-monetary event of default, and is diligently prosecuting the cure of same, under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be permitted to treat such event of default as such for purposes of transferring the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan to special servicing or exercising remedies.
Purchase Option
If an event of default with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan has occurred and is continuing, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Noteholder will have the option to purchase the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans in whole but not in part at a price generally equal to the sum, without duplication, of (a) the principal balance of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans, (b) accrued and unpaid interest on the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans through the end of the related interest accrual period, (c) any other amounts due under the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan, but excluding prepayment premiums, default interest, late fees, exit fees and any other similar fees, (d) without duplication of amounts under clause (c), any unreimbursed property protection or servicing Advances and any expenses incurred in enforcing the mortgage loan documents (including, without limitation, servicing Advances payable or reimbursable to any servicer, and earned and unreimbursed special servicing fees not in excess of the limitations set forth in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement), (e) without duplication of amounts under clause (c), any accrued and unpaid interest on Advances, (f) (i) if the borrower or borrower related party is
259
the purchaser or (ii) if the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan is not purchased within 90 days after such option first becomes exercisable pursuant to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, any liquidation or workout fees payable under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan and (g) certain additional amounts to the extent provided for in the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement.
Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loan
Pursuant to the terms of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, if the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan, and if the applicable special servicer determines to sell the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan in accordance with the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, then such special servicer will be required to sell the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans (but not the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan) together with the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan as one whole loan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan, the applicable special servicer under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA will not be permitted to sell the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan without the written consent of the issuing entity as the holder of the Yorkshire & Lexington Tower Mortgage Loan and each Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholder (provided that such consent is not required if such Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholder is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower) unless such special servicer has delivered to the issuing entity and such Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholder: (a) at least 15 business days prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans; (b) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by such special servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by the issuing entity or a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholder that are material to the price of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the Directing Holder) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by any master servicer or applicable special servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided that the issuing entity or a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Noteholder may waive any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence only for itself. Subject to the terms of the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA, the issuing entity (or its representative) and each holder of a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loan (or its representative), will be permitted to submit an offer at any sale of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans (unless such person is the borrower or an agent or affiliate of the borrower).
Replacement of Special Servicer
Pursuant to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement, the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Controlling Subordinate Companion Noteholder (other than during a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period) will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the applicable special servicer then acting with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan and appoint a replacement special servicer in lieu of such
260
applicable special servicer. During a Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period, the Controlling Class Representative (unless a control termination event under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA has occurred and is continuing), or the applicable certificateholders under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA with the requisite percentage of voting rights under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA (if a control termination event under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA has occurred and is continuing) will have the right, with or without cause (subject to the limitations described herein) to replace such special servicer then acting with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan and appoint a replacement special servicer in lieu of such applicable special servicer, as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Directing Holder—Replacement of Special Servicer” in this prospectus.
Additional Information
Each of the tables presented in Annex A-2 sets forth selected characteristics of the pool of Mortgage Loans as of the Cut-off Date, if applicable. For a detailed presentation of certain additional characteristics of the Mortgage Loans and the Mortgaged Properties on an individual basis, see Annex A-1. For a brief summary of the largest 15 Mortgage Loans in the pool of Mortgage Loans, see Annex A-3.
The description in this prospectus, including Annex A-1, Annex A-2 and Annex A-3, of the Mortgage Pool and the Mortgaged Properties is based upon the Mortgage Pool as expected to be constituted at the close of business on the Cut-off Date, as adjusted for the scheduled principal payments due on the Mortgage Loans on or before the Cut-off Date. Prior to the issuance of the Offered Certificates, a Mortgage Loan may be removed from the Mortgage Pool if the depositor deems such removal necessary or appropriate or if it is prepaid. This may cause the range of Mortgage Rates and maturities as well as the other characteristics of the Mortgage Loans to vary from those described in this prospectus.
A Form ABS-EE with the information required by Item 1125 of Regulation AB (17 CFR 2219.1125), Schedule AL – Asset-Level Information will be filed or caused to be filed by the depositor with respect to the issuing entity on or prior to the date of the filing of this prospectus and will provide such information for a reporting period commencing on the day after a hypothetical Determination Date in January 2018 and ending on a hypothetical Determination Date in February 2018. In addition, a Current Report on Form 8-K containing detailed information regarding the Mortgage Loans will be available to persons (including beneficial owners of the Offered Certificates) who receive this prospectus and will be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), together with the PSA, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or prior to the date of the filing of the final prospectus.
Transaction Parties
The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers
UBS AG, New York Branch, Société Générale, Barclays Bank PLC, Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., Ladder Capital Finance LLC, CIBC Inc. and Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC are referred to in this prospectus as the “originators”. The depositor will acquire the Mortgage Loans from UBS AG, New York Branch, Société Générale, Barclays Bank PLC, Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., Ladder Capital Finance LLC, CIBC Inc. and Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC on or about February 27, 2018 (the “Closing Date”). Each mortgage loan seller is a “sponsor” of the securitization transaction described in this prospectus. The depositor will cause the Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool to be assigned to the trustee pursuant to the PSA.
261
UBS AG, New York Branch
General
UBS AG, by and through its branch office at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, an Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulated branch of a foreign bank (“UBS AG, New York Branch”), a sponsor and a mortgage loan seller, is an affiliate of UBS Securities LLC, an underwriter. UBS AG, New York Branch originated or acquired certain Mortgage Loans sold to the depositor by it. UBS AG, New York Branch is a branch of UBS AG and the branch’s executive offices are located at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10019.
UBS AG provides financial advice and solutions to private, institutional and corporate clients worldwide, as well as private clients in Switzerland. The operational structure of the group is comprised of Corporate Center and five business divisions: Wealth Management, Wealth Management Americas, Personal & Corporate Banking, Asset Management and the Investment Bank.
UBS AG, New York Branch’s Securitization Program
UBS AG, New York Branch commenced originating commercial mortgage loans primarily for securitization or resale in 2016. UBS AG, New York Branch recently became engaged in mortgage securitizations and other structured financing arrangements. Prior to the time that UBS AG, New York Branch commenced these activities, UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. (“UBSRES”), an affiliate of UBS AG, had been engaged in the securitization of a variety of assets since 1983. UBSRES engaged in its first securitization of commercial mortgage loans in December 2006, and had securitized an aggregate of approximately $22,011,130,119 of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans through August 25, 2016. UBS AG, New York Branch’s has previously securitized an aggregate of approximately $3,271,854,179 of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans. UBS AG, New York Branch is a branch of UBS AG and its executive offices are located at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10019.
UBS AG, New York Branch originates multifamily and commercial mortgage loans throughout the United States. The multifamily and commercial mortgage loans originated or acquired and to be securitized by UBS AG, New York Branch include both small balance and large balance fixed rate loans. The commercial mortgage loans that will be sold by UBS AG, New York Branch into a commercial loan securitization sponsored by UBS AG, New York Branch will have been or will be, as applicable, originated or acquired by it. The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, a portion of which UBS AG, New York Branch is the mortgage loan seller, was co-originated by Société Générale and UBS AG, New York Branch. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan, a portion of which UBS AG, New York Branch is the mortgage loan seller of, was originated by Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. The Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, a portion of which UBS AG, New York Branch is the mortgage loan seller of, was co-originated by Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC and UBS AG, New York Branch.
In connection with commercial mortgage securitization transactions, UBS AG, New York Branch or an affiliate will generally transfer the mortgage loans to a depositor, who will then transfer those mortgage loans to the issuing entity for the related securitization. In return for the transfer of the mortgage loans by the applicable depositor to the issuing entity, the issuing entity will issue commercial mortgage pass-through certificates backed by, and supported by the cash flows generated by, those mortgage loans. In coordination with underwriters or initial purchasers, UBS AG, New York Branch works with rating agencies,
262
other loan sellers, servicers and investors and participates in structuring a securitization transaction to maximize the overall value and capital structure, taking into account numerous factors, including without limitation geographic and property type diversity and rating agency criteria.
Pursuant to an MLPA, UBS AG, New York Branch will make certain representations and warranties, subject to certain exceptions set forth therein (and attached to this prospectus in Annex D-2), to the depositor and will covenant to provide certain documents regarding the Mortgage Loans (the “UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans”) for which it acts as mortgage loan seller. In connection with certain breaches of such representations and warranties or certain defects with respect to such documents, which breaches or defects are determined to have a material adverse effect on the value of the subject UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan or such other standard as is described in the MLPA, UBS AG, New York Branch may have an obligation to repurchase such Mortgage Loan from the depositor, cure the subject defect or breach, substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan or make a Loss of Value Payment, as the case may be. See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements” in this prospectus.
Neither UBS AG, New York Branch nor any of its affiliates acts as a servicer of the commercial mortgage loans it securitizes. Instead, UBS AG, New York Branch sells the right to be appointed servicer of its securitized loans to third party servicers.
Review of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans
Overview. UBS AG, New York Branch, in its capacity as the sponsor of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans, has conducted a review of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. The review of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of one or more of UBS AG, New York Branch’s affiliates and certain third party consultants engaged by UBS AG, New York Branch (the “UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures only were relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team created a database of loan level and property level information relating to each UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related mortgage loan documents, third party reports, zoning reports, insurance policies, borrower supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by UBS AG, New York Branch during the underwriting process. After origination of each UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan, the UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team updated the information in the database with respect to the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team, to the extent such updates were provided to, and deemed material by, the UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team.
A data tape (the “UBS AG, New York Branch Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The UBS AG, New York Branch Data
263
Tape was used by the UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team to provide the numerical information regarding the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of UBS AG, New York Branch, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures, the nature, extent and timing of which were designed by UBS AG, New York Branch, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the UBS AG, New York Branch Data Tape against various source documents provided by UBS AG, New York Branch; |
● | comparing numerical information regarding the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the information contained in the UBS AG, New York Branch Data Tape; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. UBS AG, New York Branch engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan, origination counsel prepared a loan and property summary that sets forth salient loan terms and summarizes material deviations from UBS AG, New York Branch’s standard form loan documents. In addition, origination counsel for each UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan reviewed UBS AG, New York Branch’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex D-1 and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of sections of the loan agreement relating to certain UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans marked against the standard form document, (ii) a review of the loan and property summaries referred to above relating to the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, and (iii) assisting the UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team in compiling responses to a due diligence questionnaire. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions, if any, for each UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan with multiple Mortgaged Properties for compliance with the REMIC provisions.
Origination counsel also assisted in the preparation of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan summaries set forth in Annex A-3, based on their respective reviews of pertinent sections of the related mortgage loan documents.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any pending litigation that existed at the origination of any UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan, UBS AG, New York Branch requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. UBS AG, New York Branch conducted a search with respect to each borrower under a UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan to determine whether it filed for bankruptcy after origination of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan. If UBS AG, New York Branch became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of any Mortgaged Property securing a UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loan, UBS AG, New York Branch obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.
264
The UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team also consulted with UBS AG, New York Branch to confirm that the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans were originated or re-underwritten in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described below under “—UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, UBS AG, New York Branch determined that the disclosure regarding the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. UBS AG, New York Branch also determined that the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans were originated and in accordance with UBS AG, New York Branch’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria. UBS AG, New York Branch attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. UBS AG, New York Branch will perform a review of any mortgage loan that it elects to substitute for a mortgage loan in the pool in connection with a material breach of a representation or warranty or a material document defect. UBS AG, New York Branch and, if appropriate, its legal counsel, will review the mortgage loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it satisfies each of the criteria required under the terms of the related mortgage loan purchase agreement and the pooling and servicing agreement (collectively, the “UBS Qualification Criteria”). UBS AG, New York Branch will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the UBS Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by UBS AG, New York Branch and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by UBS AG, New York Branch to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
UBS AG, New York Branch’s Underwriting Standards
Set forth below is a discussion of certain general underwriting guidelines of UBS AG, New York Branch with respect to multifamily and commercial mortgage loans originated or acquired by UBS AG, New York Branch.
Notwithstanding the discussion below, given the unique nature of commercial mortgaged properties, the underwriting and origination procedures and the credit analysis with respect to any particular commercial mortgage loan may significantly differ from one asset to another, and will be driven by circumstances particular to that property, including, among others, its type, current use, size, location, market conditions, reserve requirements and additional collateral, tenants and leases, borrower identity, sponsorship, performance history and/or other factors. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the underwriting of any particular commercial or multifamily mortgage loan will conform to the general guidelines described below.
Loan Analysis. UBS AG, New York Branch generally performs both a credit analysis and a collateral analysis with respect to each multifamily and commercial mortgage loan. The credit analysis of the borrower generally includes a review of third party credit reports or judgment, lien, bankruptcy and pending litigation searches. The collateral analysis generally includes an analysis, in each case to the extent available and applicable, of the historical property operating statements, rent rolls and a review of certain significant tenant leases. UBS AG, New York Branch’s credit underwriting also generally includes a review of third party appraisals, as well as environmental reports, building condition reports and seismic reports, if applicable. Generally, a member of the mortgage loan underwriting team also conducts a site inspection to ascertain the overall quality, functionality and
265
competitiveness of the property, including its neighborhood and market, accessibility and visibility, and to assess the tenancy of the property. UBS AG, New York Branch assesses the submarket in which the property is located to evaluate competitive or comparable properties as well as market trends.
Loan Approval. Prior to commitment or closing, all multifamily and commercial mortgage loans to be originated by UBS AG, New York Branch must be approved by a loan committee which includes senior personnel from UBS AG, New York Branch or its affiliates. The committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and LTV Ratio. UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting includes a calculation of the debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio in connection with the origination of a loan.
The debt service coverage ratio will generally be calculated based on the underwritten net cash flow from the property in question as determined by UBS AG, New York Branch and payments on the loan based on actual principal and/or interest due on the loan. However, underwritten net cash flow is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property collateral. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan, UBS AG, New York Branch may utilize annual net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected future rental income, expenses and/or occupancy. There is no assurance that the foregoing assumptions made with respect to any prospective multifamily or commercial mortgage loan will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance. In addition, with respect to certain mortgage loans originated by UBS AG, New York Branch, there may exist subordinate mortgage debt or mezzanine debt. Such mortgage loans may have a lower debt service coverage ratio and/or a higher loan-to-value ratio if such subordinate or mezzanine debt is taken into account. Additionally, certain mortgage loans may provide for only interest payments prior to maturity, or for an interest-only period during a portion of the term of the mortgage loan.
The loan-to-value ratio, in general, is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan divided by the estimated value of the related property based on an appraisal.
Additional Debt. Certain mortgage loans may have or permit in the future certain additional subordinate debt, whether secured or unsecured. It is possible that UBS AG, New York Branch may be the lender on that additional debt.
The debt service coverage ratios described above may be lower based on the inclusion of the payments related to such additional debt and the loan-to-value ratios described above may be higher based on the inclusion of the amount of any such additional debt.
Assessments of Property Condition. As part of the underwriting process, UBS AG, New York Branch will obtain the property assessments and reports described below:
Appraisals. UBS AG, New York Branch will generally require independent appraisals or an update of an independent appraisal in connection with the origination of each mortgage loan that meet the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, or the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. In some cases, however, UBS AG, New York Branch may establish the value of the
266
subject real property collateral based on a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation.
Environmental Assessment. UBS AG, New York Branch will, in most cases, require a Phase I environmental assessment with respect to the real property collateral for a prospective multifamily or commercial mortgage loan. However, when circumstances warrant, UBS AG, New York Branch may utilize an update of a prior environmental assessment, a transaction screen or a desktop review. Alternatively, UBS AG, New York Branch might forego an environmental assessment in limited circumstances, such as when it has obtained the benefits of an environmental insurance policy or an environmental guarantee. Furthermore, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily uncover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when UBS AG, New York Branch or an environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances.
Depending on the findings of the initial environmental assessment, UBS AG, New York Branch may require additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment with respect to the subject real property collateral, an environmental insurance policy or a guaranty with respect to environmental matters.
Engineering Assessment. In connection with the origination process, UBS AG, New York Branch will, in most cases, require that an engineering firm inspect the real property collateral for any prospective multifamily or commercial mortgage loan to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/or mechanical and electrical systems. Based on the resulting report, UBS AG, New York Branch will determine the appropriate response to any recommended repairs, corrections or replacements and any identified deferred maintenance.
Seismic Report. Generally, a seismic report is required for all properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan, UBS AG, New York Branch will generally examine whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral is in material compliance with zoning, land use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering, zoning or consulting reports and/or representations by the related borrower.
Escrow Requirements. Based on its analysis of the real property collateral, the borrower and the principals of the borrower, UBS AG, New York Branch may require a borrower under a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan to fund various escrows for taxes and/or insurance, capital expenses, replacement reserves and/or environmental remediation. UBS AG, New York Branch conducts a case by case analysis to determine the need for a particular escrow or reserve. Consequently, the aforementioned escrows and reserves are not established for every multifamily and commercial mortgage loan originated by UBS AG, New York Branch. Furthermore, UBS AG, New York Branch may accept an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve from a borrower, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed.
267
Exceptions
One or more of the mortgage loans originated by UBS AG, New York Branch may vary from the specific UBS AG, New York Branch underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the mortgage loans originated by UBS AG, New York Branch, UBS AG, New York Branch may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors. None of the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans was originated with any material exceptions from UBS AG, New York Branch’s underwriting guidelines described above.
Litigation
UBS AG, New York Branch and UBSRES are currently engaged in litigation with respect to various legacy residential mortgage backed securities transactions. Some litigants are seeking the repurchase of mortgage loans by UBSRES from certain residential mortgage securitization trusts, on the basis that the loans are allegedly in breach of contractual representations and warranties in governing transaction documents. Other litigants are alleging violations of federal and/or state securities or common law for alleged misrepresentations and omissions in offering documents in connection with the issuance and/or distribution of residential mortgage backed securities. No assurance can be given that one or more of the foregoing actions will not result in material liability to UBS AG, New York Branch.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
UBS AG, New York Branch most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on February 14, 2017. UBS AG, New York Branch’s Central Index Key is 0001685185. With respect to the period from and including October 13, 2016 (the date of the first securitization into which UBS AG, New York Branch sold mortgage loans pursuant to which the underlying transaction documents provide a covenant to repurchase an underlying asset for breach of representation or warranty) to and including September 30, 2017, UBS AG, New York Branch has no demand, repurchase or replacement history to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither UBS AG, New York Branch nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, UBS AG, New York Branch or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—UBS AG, New York Branch” has been provided by UBS AG, New York Branch.
Ladder Capital Finance LLC
General
Ladder Capital Finance LLC (“LCF”) is a sponsor of, and a seller of certain Mortgage Loans (the “LCF Mortgage Loans”) into, the securitization described in this prospectus. LCF is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and an
268
indirect subsidiary of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP (“Ladder Holdings”), a limited liability limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP (“TRS LLLP”) and Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP (“REIT LLLP”) are each a Delaware series of Ladder Holdings. Ladder Capital Corp. (NYSE: LADR) holds a controlling interest in Ladder Holdings.
Ladder Holdings commenced operations in October 2008. Ladder Holdings, together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including LCF, are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “Ladder Capital Group”. The Ladder Capital Group is a vertically integrated, full-service commercial real estate finance and investment management company that primarily originates, underwrites, structures, acquires, manages and distributes commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans and other real estate debt instruments. The executive offices of the Ladder Capital Group are located at 345 Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10154. As of September 30, 2017, based on unaudited financial statements, Ladder Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries had total assets of approximately $6,412,040,000, total liabilities of approximately $4,946,521,000 and total capital of approximately $1,465,519,000.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, the trustee, certificate administrator, custodian, 17g-5 information provider, certificate registrar and tax administrator with respect to this securitization, and certain other third party lenders provide warehouse financing to affiliates of LCF (the “LCF Financing Affiliates”) through various repurchase facilities, borrowing base facilities or other financing arrangements. Some or all of the LCF Mortgage Loans are (or are expected to be prior to the Closing Date) subject to those financing arrangements. If such is the case at the time the certificates are issued, then LCF will use the proceeds from its sale of the LCF Mortgage Loans to the depositor to, among other things, acquire the warehoused LCF Mortgage Loans from the related LCF Financing Affiliates, and each related LCF Financing Affiliate will, in turn, use the funds that it receives from LCF to, among other things, reacquire or obtain the release of, as applicable, its warehoused LCF Mortgage Loans from the applicable repurchase agreement counterparty/lender free and clear of any liens. As of the date of this prospectus, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association was not the repurchase agreement counterparty with respect to any of the LCF Mortgage Loans. However, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association may become the repurchase counterparty with respect to one or more LCF Mortgage Loans prior to the Closing Date.
In addition, an affiliate of LCF is the borrower with respect to three (3) LCF Mortgage Loans, identified on Annex A-1 as Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, respectively, collectively representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—Interests and Incentives of the Originator and Sponsor and Its Affiliates May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests”.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association acts as interim custodian of the Mortgage Loan documents with respect to all of the LCF Mortgage Loans.
LCF and/or its affiliates may acquire certificates from time to time, including upon initial issuance or in the secondary market.
Ladder Capital Group’s Securitization Program
LCF began securitizing commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans in 2010 and has not been involved in the securitization of any other types of financial assets. During 2010, LCF contributed approximately $329.76 million of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to two
269
commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2011, LCF contributed approximately $1.02 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to three commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2012, LCF contributed approximately $1.6 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to 6 commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2013, LCF contributed approximately $2.23 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to 6 commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2014, LCF contributed approximately $3.49 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to 10 commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2015, LCF contributed approximately $2.59 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to 10 commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2016, LCF contributed approximately $1.327 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to 6 commercial mortgage securitizations. During 2017, LCF contributed approximately $2.367 billion of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans to eight (8) commercial mortgage securitizations.
The Ladder Capital Group originates, and acquires from unaffiliated third party originators, commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans throughout the United States. The following table sets forth information with respect to originations of fixed rate commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans by Ladder Capital Group during the calendar years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Originations
of Fixed Rate Multifamily,
Manufactured Housing Community and Commercial Mortgage Loans
No. of Loans | Approximate
Aggregate Principal Balance of Loans at Origination | ||||||
2010 | 48 | $ | 663,256,700 | ||||
2011 | 65 | $ | 1,170,444,775 | ||||
2012 | 152 | $ | 2,463,328,246 | ||||
2013 | 120 | $ | 2,269,641,443 | ||||
2014 | 158 | $ | 3,290,652,162 | ||||
2015 | 180 | $ | 2,702,198,989 | ||||
2016 | 158 | $ | 1,345,918,750 | ||||
2017 | 119 | $ | 1,818,074,760 |
In connection with commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates as a sponsor, LCF will generally transfer the subject mortgage loans to the applicable depositor, who will then transfer those mortgage loans to the issuing entity for the related securitization. In return for the transfer by the applicable depositor to the issuing entity of those mortgage loans (together with any other mortgage loans being securitized), the issuing entity will issue commercial mortgage pass-through certificates that are, in whole or in part, backed by, and supported by the cash flows generated by, the mortgage loans being securitized. In coordination with underwriters or initial purchasers and the applicable depositor, LCF works with rating agencies, other loan sellers, servicers and investors and participates in structuring a securitization transaction to maximize the overall value and capital structure, taking into account numerous factors, including without limitation geographic and property type diversity and rating agency criteria.
LCF will generally make certain representations and warranties and undertake certain loan document delivery requirements with respect to the mortgage loans that it contributes to a commercial mortgage securitization; and, in the event of an uncured material breach of any such representation and warranty or an uncured material document defect or omission,
270
LCF will generally be obligated to repurchase or replace the affected mortgage loan or, in some cases, pay an amount estimated to cover the approximate loss associated with such breach, defect or omission. LCF has limited assets with which to effect any such repurchase or substitution or make any such estimated loss reimbursement payment. However, as is the case in this securitization, Ladder Holdings, TRS LLLP and REIT LLLP will often guarantee LCF’s payment obligations in connection with a repurchase or substitution of a defective mortgage loan resulting from, or the making of an estimated loss reimbursement payment related to, any such breach of representation or warranty or defective or missing loan documentation. Notwithstanding the existence of any such guarantee, no assurance can be provided that Ladder Holdings, TRS LLLP, REIT LLLP or LCF will have the financial ability to effect or cause a repurchase or substitution, or to make an estimated loss reimbursement payment with respect to, a defective mortgage loan, and no other member of the Ladder Capital Group will be responsible for doing so if Ladder Holdings, TRS LLLP, REIT LLLP and LCF fail with respect to their obligations.
No member of the Ladder Capital Group acts as a servicer of the commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans that LCF or its affiliates originates, acquires or securitizes. Instead, LCF sells the right to be appointed servicer of its securitized loans to unaffiliated third party servicers and utilizes unaffiliated third party servicers as interim servicers. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association acts or has acted as interim servicer with respect to all of the LCF Mortgage Loans.
Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
Each of the LCF Mortgage Loans was originated by LCF or one of its affiliates. Set forth below is a discussion of certain general underwriting guidelines and processes with respect to commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans originated or co-originated by LCF and its affiliates for securitization.
Notwithstanding the discussion below, given the unique nature of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgaged properties, the underwriting and origination procedures and the credit analysis with respect to any particular commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan may significantly differ from one loan to another, and will be driven by circumstances particular to that property, including, among others, its type, current use, size, location, market conditions, reserve requirements and additional collateral, tenants and leases, borrower identity, sponsorship, performance history and/or other factors. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the underwriting of any particular commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan originated by LCF or one of its affiliates will conform to the general guidelines and processes described below. For important information about the circumstances that have affected the underwriting of particular LCF Mortgage Loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” and “Annex D-2—Exceptions to Mortgage Loan Representations and Warranties”.
Loan Analysis. Generally both a credit analysis and a collateral analysis are conducted with respect to each commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loan. The credit analysis of the borrower generally includes a review of third party credit reports or judgment, lien, bankruptcy and pending litigation searches. Such searches are limited in the time periods that they cover, and often cover no more than the prior 10-year period. Furthermore, in the case of equity holders in the borrowers, such searches would generally be conducted only as to equity holders with at least a 20% interest in the subject borrower or that control the subject borrower. The collateral analysis generally includes a review of, in each case to the extent available and applicable, the
271
historical property operating statements, rent rolls and certain significant tenant leases. The credit underwriting also generally includes a review of third party appraisals, as well as environmental reports, engineering assessments and seismic reports, if applicable and obtained. Generally, the originator also conducts or causes a third party to conduct a site inspection to ascertain the overall quality, functionality and competitiveness of the property, including its neighborhood and market, accessibility and visibility, and to assess the tenancy of the property. The submarket in which the property is located is assessed to evaluate the competitive or comparable properties as well as market trends.
Loan Approval. Prior to commitment, each commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loan to be originated must be approved by a loan committee that includes senior personnel from the Ladder Capital Group. The committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio. The underwriting includes a calculation of the debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio in connection with the origination of a loan. With respect to loans originated for securitization, the Ladder Capital Group’s underwriting standards generally require, without regard to any other debt, a debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.20x and a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 80.0%.
A debt service coverage ratio will generally be calculated based on the underwritten net cash flow from the property in question as determined by the Ladder Capital Group and payments on the loan based on actual (or, in some cases, assumed) principal and/or interest due on the loan. However, underwritten net cash flow is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property collateral. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan, annual net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected future rental income, expenses and/or occupancy may be utilized. There is no assurance that the foregoing assumptions made with respect to any prospective commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance. Such underwritten net cash flow may be higher than historical net cash flow reflected in recent financial statements. Additionally, certain mortgage loans may provide for only interest payments prior to maturity, or for an interest-only period during a portion of the term of the mortgage loan. A loan-to-value ratio, in general, is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan divided by the estimated value of the related property based on an appraisal.
Additional Debt. Certain mortgage loans originated by LCF or one of its affiliates may have or permit in the future certain additional subordinate debt, whether secured or unsecured, and/or mezzanine debt. It is possible that a member of the Ladder Capital Group may be the lender on that additional subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt.
The debt service coverage ratios described above will be lower based on the inclusion of the payments related to such additional debt and the loan-to-value ratios described above will be higher based on the inclusion of the amount of any such additional subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt.
Assessments
of Property Condition. As part of the underwriting process, the property assessments and reports described below will typically
be obtained:
272
● | Appraisals. Independent appraisals or an update of an independent appraisal will generally be required in connection with the origination of each mortgage loan that meets the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, or the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. In some cases, however, the value of the subject real property collateral may be established based on a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation. |
● | Environmental Assessment. In most cases, a Phase I environmental assessment will be required with respect to the real property collateral for a prospective commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan. However, when circumstances warrant, an update of a prior environmental assessment, a transaction screen or a desktop review may be utilized. Alternatively, in limited circumstances, an environmental assessment may not be required, such as when the benefits of an environmental insurance policy or an environmental guarantee have been obtained. Furthermore, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead-based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when the originator or an environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances. Depending on the findings of the initial environmental assessment, any of the following may be required: additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment with respect to the subject real property collateral; an environmental insurance policy; that the borrower conduct remediation activities or establish an operations and maintenance plan; and/or a guaranty or reserve with respect to environmental matters. |
● | Engineering Assessment. In connection with the origination process, in most cases, it will be required that an engineering firm inspect the real property collateral for any prospective commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/or mechanical and electrical systems. Based on the resulting report, the appropriate response will be determined to any recommended repairs, corrections or replacements and any identified deferred maintenance. An engineering assessment may not be conducted with respect to a mortgaged property that lacks material improvements owned by the related borrower. |
● | Seismic Report. Generally, a seismic report is required for all properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4. A seismic study may not be conducted with respect to a mortgaged property that lacks material improvements owned by the related borrower. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, engineering inspections and seismic reports will generally not be required or obtained by the originator in connection with the origination process in the case of mortgage loans secured by real properties that are subject to a ground lease, triple-net lease or other long term lease, or in the case of mortgage loans that are not collateralized by any material improvements on the real property collateral.
Title Insurance. The borrower is required to provide, and the Ladder Capital Group or its origination counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The title insurance policies provided typically must meet the following requirements: (i) written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is
273
located, (ii) in an amount at least equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan, (iii) protection and benefits run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns, (iv) written on an American Land Title Association form or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located and (v) if a survey was prepared, the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy conforms to that shown on the survey.
Casualty Insurance. Except in certain instances where sole or significant tenants (which may include ground tenants) are permitted to obtain insurance or self-insure, or where another third party unrelated to the applicable borrower (such as a condominium association, franchisor or third party property manager, if applicable) is permitted to obtain insurance, or the subject mortgaged property is covered by a blanket policy (which may have been obtained by an affiliate of the related borrower), the Ladder Capital Group typically requires that the related mortgaged property be insured by a hazard insurance policy with a customary deductible and in an amount at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan and 100% of the full insurable replacement cost of the improvements located on the property. If applicable, the policy contains appropriate endorsements to avoid the application of coinsurance and does not permit reduction in insurance proceeds for depreciation, except that the policy may permit a deduction for depreciation in connection with a cash settlement after a casualty if the insurance proceeds are not being applied to rebuild or repair the damaged improvements.
Flood insurance, if available, must be in effect for any mortgaged property that at the time of origination included material borrower-owned improvements in any area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency a special flood hazard area. The flood insurance policy must meet the requirements of the then-current guidelines of the Federal Insurance Administration, be provided by a generally acceptable insurance carrier and be in an amount representing coverage not less than the least of (i) the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan, (ii) the full insurable value of the material borrower-owned improvements at the property or, in cases where only a portion of the property is in the flood zone, the full insurable value of the material borrower-owned improvements at the portion of the property contained therein, and (iii) the maximum amount of insurance available under the National Flood Insurance Program, except in some cases where self-insurance was permitted.
The standard form of hazard insurance policy typically covers physical damage or destruction of the improvements on the mortgaged property caused by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion. The policies may contain some conditions and exclusions to coverage, including exclusions related to acts of terrorism.
Generally, except in certain instances where sole or significant tenants (which may include ground tenants) are permitted to obtain insurance or self-insure, or where another third party unrelated to the applicable borrower (such as a condominium association, franchisor or third party property manager, if applicable) is permitted to obtain insurance, or the subject mortgaged property is covered by a blanket policy (which may have been obtained by an affiliate of the related borrower), each of the mortgage loans requires that the related borrower maintain: (i) coverage for terrorism or terrorist acts, if such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates (although in many cases, there is a cap on the amount that the related borrower will be required to expend on terrorism insurance); (ii) comprehensive general liability insurance against claims for personal and bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the property in an amount customarily required by institutional lenders; and (iii) business interruption or rent loss insurance in an
274
amount not less than 100% of the projected rental income from the related property for not less than 12 months.
Although properties are typically not insured for earthquake risk, a borrower will be required to obtain earthquake insurance if the property has material improvements and the seismic report indicates that the probable maximum loss (“PML”) or scenario expected loss (“SEL”) is greater than 20%.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan, the originator will generally examine whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports, zoning reports and/or representations by the related borrower.
In some cases, a mortgaged property may constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure. In such cases, the Ladder Capital Group may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy or the acquisition of law and ordinance insurance or a non-recourse carveout in the related loan documents with respect to the particular non-conformity unless: (a) it determines that (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild, or (ii) if the improvements are rebuilt in accordance with currently applicable law, the value and performance of the property would be acceptable, or (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring; or (b) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses. In general, the Ladder Capital Group does not require zoning protection insurance.
If a material violation exists with respect to a mortgaged property, the Ladder Capital Group may require the borrower to remediate such violation and, subject to the discussion under “—Escrow Requirements” below, to establish a reserve to cover the cost of such remediation, unless a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
Escrow Requirements. Based on the originator’s analysis of the real property collateral, the borrower and the principals of the borrower, a borrower under a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan may be required to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, replacement reserves, tenant improvements/leasing commissions (depending on the property type), deferred maintenance and/or environmental remediation. A case-by-case analysis will be conducted to determine the need for a particular escrow or reserve. Consequently, the aforementioned escrows and reserves are not established for every commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loan originated by a member of the Ladder Capital Group. In certain cases, these reserves may be released to the borrower upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the related loan documents that may include, but are not limited to, achievement of leasing matters, achieving a specified debt service coverage ratio or debt yield or satisfying other conditions. Furthermore, the Ladder Capital Group may accept an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve from a borrower, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed. In some cases, the Ladder Capital Group may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and the Ladder Capital Group’s
275
evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve. In some cases, the Ladder Capital Group may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted because a tenant or other third party has agreed to pay the subject cost or expense for which the escrow or reserve would otherwise have been established.
Generally,
subject to the discussion in the prior paragraph, the required escrows for commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community
mortgage loans originated by the Ladder Capital Group are as follows:
● | Taxes—Monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy real estate taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional property sponsor or high net worth individual property sponsor, (ii) if and to the extent that a sole or major tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is required to pay taxes directly or to reimburse the landlord/borrower for the payment of such taxes or to deliver to the landlord/borrower funds for purposes of paying such taxes in advance of their due date, (iii) in the case of a hospitality property, the franchisor or a third-party property manager is maintaining such an escrow or reserve or (iv) if a sponsor, a key principal or an affiliate of the borrower delivers a guarantee relating to the payment of real estate taxes. |
● | Insurance—Monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional property sponsor or high net worth individual property sponsor, (ii) if the related borrower or an affiliate maintains a blanket insurance policy covering the subject mortgaged property, (iii) if and to the extent that a sole or major tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is permitted or required, as applicable, to maintain the insurance or to self-insure or to reimburse the landlord/borrower for the payment of insurance premiums or to deliver to the landlord/borrower funds for the purposes of paying insurance premiums in advance of their due date, (iv) if and to the extent that another third party unrelated to the applicable borrower (such as a condominium association, franchisor or third party property manager, if applicable) is permitted to maintain the insurance, (v) in the case of a hospitality property, the franchisor or a third-party property manager is maintaining such an escrow or reserve or (vi) if a sponsor, a key principal or an affiliate of the borrower delivers a guarantee relating to the payment of insurance premiums. |
● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan and may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term and/or after the occurrence and during the continuance of a specified trigger event. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements by property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if and to the extent a tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property or |
276
other third party is responsible (either directly or through reimbursing the landlord borrower) for all repairs and maintenance, (ii) if a sponsor, a key principal or an affiliate of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to take responsibility and pay for the related costs and expenses, (iii) if the Ladder Capital Group determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and the Ladder Capital Group’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the cost of repairs and maintenance absent creation of an escrow or reserve, or (iv) in the case of a hospitality property, the franchisor or a third-party property manager is maintaining such an escrow or reserve. |
● | Tenant Improvements / Leasing Commissions—In the case of retail, office and industrial properties, a tenant improvements / leasing commissions reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term and/or after the occurrence and during the continuance of a specified trigger event to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by significant tenants, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term, (ii) if a sponsor, a key principal or an affiliate of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to take responsibility and pay for the related costs and expenses, (iii) if the rent for the space in question is considered below market, or (iv) if the Ladder Capital Group determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and the Ladder Capital Group’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
● | Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount typically equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition or engineering report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor, a key principal or an affiliate of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) if the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property, (iii) if a tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property or other third party is responsible for the repairs, or (iv) if the Ladder Capital Group determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and the Ladder Capital Group’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the cost of repairs absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
● | Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount typically equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor, a key principal or an affiliate of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues, (ii) if environmental insurance is obtained or already in place, (iii) if a third party unrelated to the borrower is identified as the responsible party or (iv) if the Ladder Capital Group determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the |
277
amounts that would be involved and the Ladder Capital Group’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the cost of remediation absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the LCF Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A-1.
Exceptions. Notwithstanding the discussion under “—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes” above, one or more of the LCF Mortgage Loans may vary from, or do not comply with, Ladder Capital Group’s underwriting guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the LCF Mortgage Loans, LCF or another originator may not have strictly applied the underwriting guidelines described above as the result of a case by case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors.
None of the LCF Mortgage Loans were originated with any material exceptions to the related above-disclosed underwriting criteria.
Review of LCF Mortgage Loans
Overview. LCF has conducted a review of the LCF Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. The review of the LCF Mortgage Loans was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of Ladder Capital Group (the “Ladder Capital Review Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the LCF Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures only were relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the Ladder Capital Review Team created a database of loan-level and property-level information, and prepared an asset summary report, relating to each LCF Mortgage Loan. The database and the respective asset summary reports were compiled from, among other sources, the related loan documents, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, seismic studies, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Ladder Capital Review Team during the underwriting process. After origination of each LCF Mortgage Loan, the Ladder Capital Review Team updated the information in the database and the related asset summary report with respect to such LCF Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the Ladder Capital Review Team.
A data tape (the “LCF Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each LCF Mortgage Loan was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The LCF Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the LCF Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data
Comparisons and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of LCF, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data
comparison and recalculation procedures designed by LCF, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the LCF Mortgage
Loans. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the LCF Data Tape against various source documents provided by LCF; |
278
● | comparing numerical information regarding the LCF Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the LCF Data Tape; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the LCF Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. The Ladder Capital Group engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the LCF Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of the LCF Mortgage Loans, the Ladder Capital Group’s origination counsel for each LCF Mortgage Loan reviewed securitization representations and warranties presented to them by LCF and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization to assist in the review of the LCF Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of the Ladder Capital Group’s credit memo or asset summary report or a draft thereof for each LCF Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance of $10 million or more, (ii) a review of a due diligence questionnaire regarding the LCF Mortgage Loans prepared by the Ladder Capital Group, (iii) a review of various statistical data tapes prepared by the Ladder Capital Group, (iv) a review of the representation and warranty exception reports referred to above relating to certain of the LCF Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, and (v) the review of select provisions in certain loan documents with respect to certain of the LCF Mortgage Loans.
Origination counsel or securitization counsel also assisted in the preparation of the individual LCF Mortgage Loan summaries set forth on Annex A-3 to this prospectus based on their respective reviews of the related asset summary reports and the pertinent sections of the related Mortgage Loan documents.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any material pending litigation of which the Ladder Capital Group was aware at the origination of any LCF Mortgage Loan, the Ladder Capital Group requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. If the Ladder Capital Group became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of the Mortgaged Property securing any LCF Mortgage Loan, the Ladder Capital Group obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.
The Ladder Capital Review Team also reviewed the LCF Mortgage Loans to determine, with the assistance of counsel engaged in connection with this securitization, whether any LCF Mortgage Loan materially deviated from the underwriting guidelines described under “—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes” above.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, Ladder Capital Group determined that the disclosure regarding the LCF Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. Ladder Capital Group also determined that none of the LCF Mortgage Loans were originated with any material exceptions to Ladder Capital Group’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria described under “—Ladder Capital Group’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes” above, except as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines”. LCF attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. The Ladder Capital Group will perform a review of any mortgage loan that it elects to substitute for a LCF Mortgage Loan in the pool in connection with material breach of a representation or
279
warranty or a material document defect. The Ladder Capital Group, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the mortgage loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related mortgage loan purchase agreement and the related pooling and servicing agreement (the “Qualification Criteria”). The Ladder Capital Group will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by the Ladder Capital Group and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by the Ladder Capital Group to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
As of the date of this prospectus, LCF most recently filed a Form ABS-15G pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act on February 13, 2017. LCF’s Central Index Key number is 0001541468. With respect to the period from and including January 1, 2015 to and including December 31, 2017, LCF does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither LCF nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization, except that affiliates of LCF will, in the aggregate, purchase $50,000,000 Certificate Balance of the Class A-3 certificates and $50,000,000 Certificate Balance of the Class A-4 certificates on the Closing Date. In addition, LCF or its affiliates may acquire additional certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates (whether acquired on the Closing Date or in the secondary market) at any time.
The information set forth under “—Ladder Capital Finance LLC” has been provided by LCF.
Société Générale
General
Société Générale, a French limited liability company (société anonyme) authorized as a bank, acting through its New York Branch (“Société Générale”), is a sponsor and mortgage loan seller in this transaction. The principal offices of Société Générale in the United States are located at 245 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10167, and its telephone number is (212) 278 6461. Société Générale is an affiliate of SG Americas Securities, LLC, one of the underwriters.
Société Générale’s Commercial Mortgage Securitization Program
Société Générale has been engaged in commercial mortgage securitization in the United States since January 2015, although it was also engaged in mortgage securitization businesses prior to 2009. The vast majority of mortgage loans originated by Société Générale’s commercial real estate securitization business line are intended to be either sold through securitization transactions in which Société Générale acts as a sponsor or sold to third parties in individual loan sale transactions. Other business lines within Société Générale may from time to time engage in the business of making commercial real estate
280
loans that are not originated for the purposes of securitization and that may in fact be held by Société Générale through maturity. The following is a general description of the types of mortgage loans related to commercial real estate that Société Générale’s commercial real estate securitization team originates for securitization purposes:
● | Fixed rate mortgage loans generally having maturities between five and ten years and generally secured by commercial real estate such as office, retail, hospitality, multifamily, residential, healthcare, self storage and industrial properties. These loans are Société Générale’s commercial real estate securitization team’s principal loan product and are primarily originated for the purpose of securitization. |
● | Floating rate loans generally having shorter maturities and secured by stabilized and non-stabilized commercial real estate properties. These loans are primarily originated for securitization, though in certain cases only a senior interest in the loan is intended to be securitized. |
● | Subordinate mortgage loans and mezzanine loans. These loans are generally not originated for securitization by Société Générale and are sold in individual loan sale transactions. |
In general, Société Générale does not hold the loans that its commercial real estate securitization team originates until maturity.
Société Générale originates mortgage loans and initiates a securitization transaction by selecting the portfolio of mortgage loans to be securitized and transferring those mortgage loans to a securitization depositor who in turn transfers those mortgage loans to the issuing trust fund. In selecting a portfolio to be securitized, consideration is given to geographic concentration, property type concentration and rating agency models and criteria, such that the overall value and capital structure is maximized for the benefit of Société Générale.
Société Générale’s role may also include engaging third-party service providers such as the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator, and engaging the rating agencies. In coordination with the underwriters for the related offering, Société Générale works with rating agencies, investors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers in structuring the securitization transaction.
Neither Société Générale nor any of its affiliates act as servicer of the mortgage loans in its securitization transactions it participates in. Instead, other entities will be contracted to service the mortgage loans in such securitization transactions.
Société Générale sold mortgage loans into securitizations until 2009 and resumed this activity with the WFCM 2015-SG1 transaction. For the period beginning in January 2015 through December 31, 2017, Société Générale has securitized 140 fixed rate commercial mortgage loans with an aggregate original principal balance of approximately $3.1 billion.
Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards
Each of the Mortgage Loans originated by Société Générale (“Société Générale Mortgage Loans”) was generally originated or co-originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below. Each lending situation is unique, however, and the facts and circumstances surrounding a particular mortgage loan, such as the quality and location of the real estate collateral, the sponsorship of the borrower and the tenancy of the collateral, will impact the extent to which the general guidelines below are applied to that specific loan. These underwriting criteria are general, and Société Générale cannot assure you that every loan will comply in all respects with the guidelines. Société Générale’s commercial real
281
estate securitization business line originates mortgage loans principally for securitization. Commercial real estate loans originated by other business lines within Société Générale for purposes other than securitization are not required to be originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below.
General. Société Générale originates mortgage loans for securitization from its U.S. headquarters in New York, New York. Bankers within the origination group focus on sourcing, structuring, underwriting and performing due diligence on their loans. Bankers within the structured finance group work closely with the loans’ originators to ensure that the loans are suitable for securitization and satisfy rating agency criteria. All mortgage loans must be approved by at least one or more members of Société Générale’s credit committee, depending on the size of the mortgage loan.
Loan Analysis. Generally, Société Générale performs both a credit analysis and collateral analysis with respect to a loan applicant and the real estate that will secure a mortgage loan. In general, the analysis of a borrower includes a review of money laundering and background checks and the analysis of its sponsor includes a review of money laundering and background checks, third-party credit reports, bankruptcy and lien searches, general banking references and commercial mortgage related references. In general, the analysis of the collateral includes a site visit and a review of the property’s historical operating statements (if available), independent market research, an appraisal with an emphasis on rental and sales comparables, engineering and environmental reports, the property’s historic and current occupancy, financial strengths of tenants, the duration and terms of tenant leases and the use of the property. Each report is reviewed for acceptability by a real estate finance officer of Société Générale. The borrower’s and property manager’s experience and presence in the subject market are also reviewed. Consideration is also given to anticipated changes in cash flow that may result from changes in lease terms or market considerations.
Borrowers are generally required to be single purpose entities although they are generally not required to be structured to limit the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt unless the loan has a principal balance of greater than $30 million, in which case additional limitations including the requirement that the borrower have at least one independent director are required.
Loan Approval. All mortgage loans originated by Société Générale must be approved by at least one real estate finance credit officer and the head of commercial real estate securitization. Prior to closing loans, a credit memorandum is produced and delivered to the credit committee. If deemed appropriate a member of the real estate credit department will visit the subject property. The credit committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Property Analysis. Prior to origination of a loan, Société Générale typically performs, or causes to be performed, site inspections at each property. Depending on the property type, such inspections generally include an evaluation of one or more of the following: functionality, design, attractiveness, visibility and accessibility of the property as well as proximity to major thoroughfares, transportation centers, employment sources, retail areas, educational facilities and recreational areas. Such inspections generally assess the submarket in which the property is located, which may include evaluating competitive or comparable properties.
Appraisal and Loan-to-value Ratio. Société Générale typically obtains an appraisal that complies, or is certified by the appraiser to comply, with the real estate appraisal
282
regulations issued jointly by the federal bank regulatory agencies under the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices as amended from time to time. The loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage loan is generally based on the “as-is” value set forth in the appraisal. In certain cases, the loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage loan is based on the “as-complete” or “as-stabilized” value set forth in the appraisal. In certain cases, an updated appraisal is obtained.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-value Ratio. Société Générale’s underwriting standards generally mandate minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum loan-to-value ratios. A loan-to-value ratio generally based upon the appraiser’s determination of value as well as the value derived using a stressed capitalization rate is considered. The debt service coverage ratio is based upon the underwritten net cash flow and is given particular importance. However, notwithstanding such guidelines, in certain circumstances the actual debt service coverage ratios, loan-to-value ratios and amortization periods for the mortgage loans originated by Société Générale may vary from these guidelines.
Escrow Requirements. Generally, Société Générale requires most borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes and insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves. In the case of certain hotel loans, FF&E reserves may be held by the franchisor or manager rather than the lender. Generally, the required escrows for mortgage loans originated by Société Générale are as follows (see Annex A-1 for instances in which reserves were not taken):
● | Taxes—Typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. Société Générale may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances including, but not limited to, (i) where a tenant is required to pay the taxes directly, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, or (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio (i.e., less than 60%). |
● | Insurance—If the property is insured under an individual policy (i.e., the property is not covered by a blanket policy), typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. Société Générale may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where a property is covered by a blanket insurance policy maintained by the borrower or sponsor, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iii) where an investment grade tenant is responsible for paying all insurance premiums, or (iv) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio (i.e., less than 60%). |
● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan plus two years. Société Générale relies on information provided by an independent engineer to make this determination. Société Générale may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where an investment grade tenant is responsible for replacements under the terms of its lease, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, or (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio (i.e., less than 60%). |
● | Completion Repair/Environmental Remediation—Typically, a completion repair or remediation reserve is required where an environmental or engineering report |
283
suggests that such reserve is necessary. Upon funding of the related mortgage loan, Société Générale generally requires that at least 115%-125% of the estimated costs of repairs or replacements be reserved and generally requires that repairs or replacements be completed within a year after the funding of the related mortgage loan. Société Générale may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where a secured creditor insurance policy or borrower insurance policy is in place, or (ii) where an investment grade party has agreed to take responsibility, and pay, for any required repair or remediation. |
● | Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions—In most cases, various tenants have lease expirations within the mortgage loan term. To mitigate this risk, special reserves may be required to be funded either at closing of the mortgage loan and/or during the mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re leasing the space occupied by such tenants. Société Générale may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (ii) where tenant improvement costs are the responsibility of investment grade tenants who do not have termination rights under their leases, (iii) where rents at the mortgaged property are considered to be significantly below market, (iv) where no material leases expire within the mortgage loan term, or (v) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio (i.e., less than 60%). |
Environmental Report. Société Générale generally obtains a Phase I ESA or an update of a previously obtained ESA for each mortgaged property prepared by an approved environmental consulting firm. Société Générale or its designated agent typically reviews the Phase I ESA to verify the presence or absence of potential adverse environmental conditions. In cases in which the Phase I ESA identifies any such conditions and no third party is identified as responsible for such condition, or the condition has not otherwise been satisfactorily mitigated, Société Générale generally requires the borrower to conduct remediation activities, or to establish an operations and maintenance plan or to place funds in escrow to be used to address any required remediation. In cases in which the Phase I ESA recommends that a Phase II ESA be obtained, Société Générale generally requires such Phase II ESA to be obtained.
Physical Condition Report. Société Générale generally obtains a current PCR for each mortgaged property prepared by an approved structural engineering firm. Société Générale, or an agent, typically reviews the PCR to determine the physical condition of the property, and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PCR identifies an immediate need for material repairs or replacements with an anticipated cost that is over a certain minimum threshold or percentage of loan balance, Société Générale often requires that funds be put in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements or obtains a guarantee from a sponsor of the borrower in lieu of reserves.
Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and Société Générale or its counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The title insurance policies provided typically must meet the following requirements: (a) written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located, (b) in an amount at least equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan, (c) protection and benefits run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns, (d) written on an American Land Title Association (“ALTA”) form or equivalent policy promulgated in the
284
jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located and (e) if a survey was prepared, the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy conforms to that shown on the survey.
Property Insurance. Société Générale typically requires the borrower to provide one or more of the following insurance policies: (1) commercial general liability insurance for bodily injury or death and property damage; (2) an “All Risk of Physical Loss” policy; (3) if applicable, boiler and machinery coverage; and (4) if the mortgaged property is located in a special flood hazard area where mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply, flood insurance. In some cases, a sole tenant is responsible for maintaining insurance and, subject to the satisfaction of rating conditions or net worth criteria, is allowed to self-insure against the risks.
Other Factors. Other factors that are considered by Société Générale in the origination of a commercial mortgage loan include current operations, occupancy and tenant base.
Exceptions. Notwithstanding the discussion under “—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards” above, one or more of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans may vary from, or do not comply with, Société Générale’s underwriting guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans, Société Générale may not have strictly applied the underwriting guidelines described above as the result of a case by case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors. None of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans were originated with any material exceptions to Société Générale’s underwriting policies.
Review of the Mortgage Loans for Which Société Générale is the Sponsor
Overview. In connection with the securitization described in this prospectus, Société Générale, as a sponsor of this offering, has conducted a review of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans it is selling to the depositor designed and effected to provide reasonable assurance that the disclosure related to such Société Générale Mortgage Loans is accurate in all material respects. Société Générale determined the nature, extent and timing of the review and the level of assistance provided by any third parties. The review of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans was conducted as described below with respect to each of those Société Générale Mortgage Loans. The review of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees and contractors of Société Générale or its affiliates (collectively, the “Société Générale Deal Team”) with the assistance of certain third parties. Société Générale has ultimate authority and control over, and assumes all responsibility for and attributes to itself, the review of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans and the review’s findings and conclusions. The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans (rather than relying on sampling procedures), except that certain review procedures were only relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of Société Générale Deal Team created a database of loan level and property level information, and prepared an asset summary report, regarding each of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans. The database and the respective asset summary reports were compiled from, among other sources, the related mortgage loan documents, appraisals, environmental reports, seismic reports, property condition reports, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by Société Générale during the underwriting process. After origination of each of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans, Société Générale Deal
285
Team may have updated the information in the database and the related asset summary report with respect to the Société Générale Mortgage Loans based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of Société Générale Deal Team. Such updates were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of any Société Générale Mortgage Loan.
A data tape (the “Société Générale Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The Société Générale Data Tape was used by the Société Générale Deal Team to provide the numerical information regarding the Société Générale Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparisons and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of Société Générale, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed or provided by Société Générale, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the Société Générale Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the Société Générale Data Tape against various source documents provided by Société Générale; |
● | comparing numerical information regarding the Société Générale Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the information contained in the Société Générale Data Tape; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the Société Générale Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. Société Générale engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans, origination counsel prepared a loan summary that sets forth salient loan terms and summarizes material deviations from Société Générale’s standard form loan documents. In addition, origination counsel for each Société Générale Mortgage Loan reviewed Société Générale’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex D-1 and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Loan seller’s counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of sections of the Mortgage Loan documents that deviate materially from Société Générale’s standard form documents, as identified by Société Générale and origination counsel, (ii) a review of the asset summary reports and the loan summaries prepared by Société Générale relating to the Société Générale Mortgage Loans, and (iii) a review of a due diligence questionnaire completed by the origination counsel.
Société Générale prepared, and both originating counsel and loan seller’s counsel reviewed, the loan summaries for the Société Générale Mortgage Loans included in the 15 largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool, and the abbreviated loan summaries for the Société Générale Mortgage Loans included in the next 5 largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool, which loan summaries and abbreviated loan summaries are incorporated in “Summaries of the Fifteen Largest Mortgage Loans” in the attached Annex A-3.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any pending litigation that existed at the origination of any of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans, Société Générale requested
286
updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. In connection with the origination of each Société Générale Mortgage Loan, Société Générale, together with origination counsel, conducted a search with respect to each borrower under the related Société Générale Mortgage Loan to determine whether it filed for bankruptcy. If Société Générale became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of any Mortgaged Property securing one of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans, Société Générale obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the related borrower to confirm that there was no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.
Additionally, with respect to each Société Générale Mortgage Loan, the Société Générale Deal Team also consulted with the applicable Société Générale mortgage loan origination team to confirm that each of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans was originated in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described above under “—Société Générale’s Underwriting Standards”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” in this prospectus.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. Société Générale will perform a review of any Société Générale Mortgage Loan that it elects to substitute for a Société Générale Mortgage Loan in the pool in connection with a material breach of a representation or warranty or a material document defect. Société Générale, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the mortgage loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related MLPA and the PSA (the “Qualification Criteria”). Société Générale may engage a third party to compare the Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by Société Générale and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by Société Générale to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
Findings and Conclusions. Société Générale found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the disclosure regarding the Société Générale Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. Société Générale also found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the Société Générale Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with Société Générale’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
Société Générale most recently filed a Form ABS-15G with the SEC pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 on February 9, 2017. Société Générale’s Central Index Key number is 0001238163. With respect to the period from and including January 1, 2012 to and including September 30, 2017, Société Générale does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither Société Générale nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, Société Générale or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such certificates at any time.
287
The information set forth under “—Société Générale” has been provided by Société Générale.
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.
General
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (“CCRE Lending”) is a sponsor of, and a seller of certain mortgage loans (the “CCRE Mortgage Loans”) into, the securitization described in this prospectus. CCRE Lending is a Delaware limited partnership and an affiliate of Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., one of the underwriters, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, a primary servicer. CCRE Lending was formed in 2010. Its general partner is Cantor Commercial Real Estate Holdings, LLC, and its limited partner is Cantor Commercial Real Estate Company, L.P. CCRE Lending’s executive offices are located at 110 East 59th Street, New York, New York 10022, telephone number (212) 938-5000.
CCRE Lending is engaged in the origination of commercial mortgage loans with the primary intent to sell the loans within a short period of time subsequent to origination into a commercial mortgage backed securities primary issuance securitization or through a sale of whole loan interests to third party investors. CCRE Lending originates loans primarily for securitization; however, CCRE Lending also originates subordinate mortgage loans or subordinate participation interests in mortgage loans, and mezzanine loans (loans secured by equity interests in entities that own commercial real estate), for sale to third party investors.
CCRE Lending originates loans and aggregates and warehouses the loans pending sale via a commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) securitization.
CCRE Lending’s Loan Origination and Acquisition History
Since its founding in July 2010 through September 30, 2017, CCRE Lending has originated or acquired approximately 1,394 fixed and floating rate commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans with an aggregate original principal balance of approximately $26.1 billion and has acted as a sponsor and mortgage loan seller on 68 fixed-rate and floating-rate commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions.
In future transactions, it is anticipated that many of the commercial mortgage loans originated or acquired by CCRE Lending will be sold to securitizations in which CCRE Lending acts as a sponsor. CCRE Lending expects to originate and acquire both fixed rate and floating rate commercial mortgage loans which will be included in both public and private securitizations. CCRE Lending also expects to originate and acquire subordinate and mezzanine debt for investment, syndication or securitization.
Neither CCRE Lending nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against CCRE Lending for any losses or other claims in connection with the certificates or the CCRE Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for Material Defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by CCRE Lending in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
For a description of certain affiliations, relationships and related transactions between the sponsor and the other transaction parties, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts
288
of Interest” and “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
Review of CCRE Mortgage Loans
Overview. CCRE Lending has conducted a review of the CCRE Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. The review of the CCRE Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals (the “CCRE Deal Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the CCRE Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures were relevant only to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Data Tape. To prepare for securitization, members of the CCRE Deal Team created a data tape (the “CCRE Data Tape”) containing detailed loan-level and property-level information regarding each CCRE Mortgage Loan. The CCRE Data Tape was compiled from, among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan Documents, appraisals, environmental reports, seismic reports, property condition reports, zoning reports, insurance policies, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by CCRE Lending during the underwriting process. The CCRE Deal Team updated the information in the CCRE Data Tape with respect to the CCRE Mortgage Loans from time to time based on updates provided by the related loan servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity and information otherwise brought to the attention of the CCRE Deal Team. The CCRE Data Tape was used by the CCRE Deal Team in providing the numerical information regarding the CCRE Mortgage Loans.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of CCRE Lending, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by CCRE Lending relating to information in this prospectus regarding the CCRE Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the CCRE Data Tape against various source documents provided by CCRE Lending that are described above under “—Data Tape”; |
● | comparing numerical information regarding the CCRE Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the CCRE Data Tape; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the CCRE Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. CCRE Lending engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the CCRE Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each CCRE Mortgage Loan originated by CCRE Lending, origination counsel prepared a loan summary that sets forth salient loan terms and summarizes material deviations from CCRE Lending’s standard form loan documents. In addition, origination counsel for each CCRE Mortgage Loan reviewed CCRE Lending’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex C and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the CCRE Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, a review of (i) a due diligence
289
questionnaires completed by origination counsel and (ii) exceptions to representations and warranties compiled by origination counsel. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions (other than the partial defeasance provisions), if any, for each CCRE Mortgage Loan with multiple Mortgaged Properties or, to the extent identified by origination counsel, for each CCRE Mortgage Loan with permitted outparcel releases or similar releases for compliance with the REMIC provisions of the Code.
CCRE Lending prepared, and reviewed with originating counsel and/or securitization counsel, the loan summaries for those of the CCRE Mortgage Loans included in the 10 largest Mortgage Loans in the mortgage pool, and the abbreviated loan summaries for those of the CCRE Mortgage Loans included in the next five (5) largest Mortgage Loans in the mortgage pool, which loan summaries and abbreviated loan summaries are incorporated in “Annex A-3—Description of the Top Fifteen Mortgage Loans and Additional Mortgage Loan Information”.
Other Review Procedures. In connection with the origination of each CCRE Mortgage Loan, CCRE Lending conducted a search with respect to each borrower under the related CCRE Mortgage Loan to determine whether it filed for bankruptcy. With respect to any material pending litigation that existed at the origination of any CCRE Mortgage Loan, CCRE Lending requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. If CCRE Lending became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of any mortgaged property securing a CCRE Mortgage Loan, CCRE Lending obtained information on the status of the mortgaged property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the mortgaged property.
With respect to the CCRE Mortgage Loans originated by CCRE Lending, the CCRE Deal Team also consulted with the applicable CCRE Mortgage Loan origination team to confirm that the CCRE Mortgage Loans were originated in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described below under “—CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards”.
Findings and Conclusions. CCRE Lending found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the disclosure regarding the CCRE Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. CCRE Lending also found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the CCRE Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with CCRE Lending’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria. CCRE Lending attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
CCRE Lending’s Underwriting Standards
General. CCRE Lending’s commercial mortgage loans are generally originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below; however, variations from these guidelines may be implemented as a result of various conditions, including each loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower/loan sponsor, or any other pertinent information deemed material by CCRE Lending. Therefore, this general description of CCRE Lending’s underwriting standards is not intended as a representation that every CCRE Mortgage Loan complies entirely with all criteria set forth below.
Loan Analysis. The credit underwriting process for each CCRE Lending loan is performed by a team comprised of real estate professionals that typically includes a senior member, originator, underwriter, transaction manager and loan closer. This team is required to conduct a thorough review of the related mortgaged property, which typically includes an examination of historical operating statements, rent rolls, tenant leases, current and historical real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules, and third-party
290
reports pertaining to appraisal/valuation, zoning, environmental status and physical condition/seismic/engineering.
A member of the CCRE Lending team or an agent of CCRE Lending is required to perform an inspection of the property as well as a review of the surrounding market area, including demand generators and competing properties, in order to confirm tenancy information, assess the physical quality of the collateral, determine visibility and access characteristics, and evaluate the property’s competitiveness within its market.
The CCRE Lending team or an affiliate of CCRE Lending, along with a third-party provider engaged by CCRE Lending, also performs a detailed review of the financial status, credit history and background of the borrower and certain key principals through financial statements, income tax returns, credit reports, criminal/background investigations, and specific searches for judgments, liens, bankruptcy and pending litigation. Circumstances may also warrant an examination of the financial strength and credit of key tenants as well as other factors that may impact the tenants’ ongoing occupancy or ability to pay rent.
After the compilation and review of all documentation and other relevant considerations, the CCRE Lending team finalizes its detailed underwriting analysis of the property’s cash flow in accordance with CCRE Lending’s property-specific, cash flow underwriting guidelines. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate loan terms to structure in a manner to mitigate risks, resulting in features such as ongoing escrows or upfront reserves, letters of credit, lockboxes/cash management or guarantees. A complete credit committee package is prepared to summarize all of the above-referenced information.
Loan Approval. All commercial mortgage loans must be presented to one or more credit committees that consist of senior real estate and finance professionals of CCRE Lending and its affiliates among others. After a review of the credit committee package and a discussion of the loan, the committee may approve the loan as recommended, request additional due diligence or loan structure, modify the terms, or reject the loan entirely.
Debt Service Coverage and LTV Ratio. CCRE Lending’s underwriting standards generally require a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x and maximum loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of 80%; however, these thresholds are guidelines and exceptions may be made on the merits of each loan. Certain properties may also be encumbered by subordinate debt secured by the related mortgaged property and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower, which when such mezzanine or subordinate debt is taken into account, may result in aggregate debt that does not conform to the aforementioned parameters; namely, the debt service coverage ratios described above will be lower based on the inclusion of the payments related to such additional debt and the LTV ratios described above will be higher based on the inclusion of the amount of any such additional subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt.
The aforementioned debt service coverage ratio requirements pertain to the underwritten cash flow at origination and may not hold true for each CCRE Mortgage Loan as reported in this prospectus. Property and loan information is typically updated for securitization, including an update or re-underwriting of the property’s cash flow, which may reflect positive or negative developments at the property or in the market that have occurred since origination, possibly resulting in an increase or decrease in the debt service coverage ratio.
Additional Debt. Certain mortgage loans may have, or permit in the future, certain additional subordinate debt, whether secured or unsecured, and/or mezzanine debt. It is
291
possible that CCRE Lending or an affiliate thereof may be the lender on that additional subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt.
Amortization Requirements. While CCRE Lending’s underwriting guidelines generally permit a maximum amortization period of 30 years, certain loans may provide for interest-only payments through maturity or for an initial portion of the mortgage loan term; however, if the loan entails only a partial interest-only period, the monthly debt service, annual debt service and debt service coverage ratio set forth in this prospectus will reflect a calculation on the future (larger) amortizing loan payment.
Servicing. Interim servicing for all CCRE Lending loans prior to securitization will typically be performed by an unaffiliated third party such as Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank National Association or an affiliate of CCRE Lending, Berkeley Point; however, primary servicing may be occasionally retained by certain qualified subservicers under established sub-servicing agreements with CCRE Lending, which may be retained post-securitization. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities will be transferred from such third-party servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) at closing. From time to time, the original third-party servicer may retain primary servicing.
Assessments of Property Condition
As part of the underwriting process, the property assessments and reports described below will typically be obtained:
(i) Appraisals. Independent appraisals or an update of an independent appraisal will generally be required in connection with the origination of each mortgage loan that meets the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, or the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. In some cases, however, the value of the subject real property collateral may be established based on a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation.
(ii) Environmental Assessment. In most cases, a Phase I environmental assessment will be required with respect to the real property collateral for a prospective commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan. However, when circumstances warrant, an update of a prior environmental assessment, a transaction screen or a desktop review may be utilized. Alternatively, in limited circumstances, an environmental assessment may not be required, such as when the benefits of an environmental insurance policy or an environmental guarantee have been obtained. Furthermore, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead-based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when the originator or an environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances. Depending on the findings of the initial environmental assessment, any of the following may be required: additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment with respect to the subject real property collateral; an environmental insurance policy; that the borrower conduct remediation activities or establish an operations and maintenance plan; and/or a guaranty or reserve with respect to environmental matters.
292
(iii) Engineering Assessment. In connection with the origination process, in most cases it will be required that an engineering firm inspect the real property collateral for any prospective commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/or mechanical and electrical systems. Based on the resulting report, the appropriate response will be determined to any recommended repairs, corrections or replacements and any identified deferred maintenance.
(iv) Seismic Report. Generally, a seismic report is required for all properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, engineering inspections and seismic reports will generally not be required or obtained by the originator in connection with the origination process in the case of mortgage loans secured by real properties that are subject to a ground lease, triple-net lease or other long-term lease, or in the case of mortgage loans that are not collateralized by any material improvements on the real property collateral.
Title Insurance. The borrower is required to provide, and CCRE Lending or its origination counsel will typically review, a title insurance policy for each property. The title insurance policies provided typically must be: (i) written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located, (ii) in an amount at least equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan, (iii) issued such that protection and benefits run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns, (iv) written on an American Land Title Association form or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located and (v) issued such that if a survey was prepared, the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy conforms to that shown on the survey.
Casualty Insurance. Except in certain instances where sole or significant tenants (which may include ground tenants) are required to obtain insurance or may self-insure, CCRE Lending typically requires that the related mortgaged property be insured by a hazard insurance policy with a customary deductible and in an amount at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan and 100% of the full insurable replacement cost of the improvements located on the property. If applicable, the policy contains appropriate endorsements to avoid the application of coinsurance and does not permit reduction in insurance proceeds for depreciation, except that the policy may permit a deduction for depreciation in connection with a cash settlement after a casualty if the insurance proceeds are not being applied to rebuild or repair the damaged improvements.
Flood insurance, if available, must be in effect for any mortgaged property that at the time of origination included material improvements in any area identified as a special flood hazard area in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The flood insurance policy must meet the requirements of the then-current guidelines of the Federal Insurance Administration, be provided by a generally acceptable insurance carrier and be in an amount representing coverage not less than the least of (i) the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan, (ii) the full insurable value of the property or, in cases where only a portion of the property is in the flood zone, the full insurable value of the portion of the property contained therein, and (iii) the maximum amount of insurance available under the National Flood Insurance Program, except in some cases where self-insurance was permitted.
The standard form of hazard insurance policy typically covers physical damage or destruction of the improvements on the mortgaged property caused by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion. The policies may
293
contain some conditions and exclusions to coverage, including exclusions related to acts of terrorism. Generally, each of the mortgage loans requires that the related property have coverage for terrorism or terrorist acts, if such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates. In all (or substantially all) cases, there is a cap on the amount that the related borrower will be required to expend on terrorism insurance.
The mortgage loan documents typically also require the borrower to maintain comprehensive general liability insurance against claims for personal and bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the property in an amount customarily required by institutional lenders.
The mortgage loan documents typically further require the related borrower to maintain business interruption or rent loss insurance in an amount not less than 100% of the projected rental income from the related property for not less than twelve months.
Although properties are typically not insured for earthquake risk, a borrower will be required to obtain earthquake insurance if the property has material improvements and the seismic report indicates that the probable maximum loss (“PML”) or scenario expected loss (“SEL”) is greater than 20%.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan, the originator will generally examine whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports, zoning reports and/or representations by the related borrower.
In some cases, a mortgaged property may constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure. In such cases, CCRE Lending may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy or the acquisition of law and ordinance or similar insurance with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild; (ii) if the improvements are rebuilt in accordance with currently applicable law, the value and performance of the property would be acceptable; (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring; or (iv) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
If a material violation exists with respect to a mortgaged property, CCRE Lending may require the borrower to remediate such violation and, subject to the discussion under “—Escrow Requirements” below, establish a reserve to cover the cost of such remediation, unless a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
Escrow Requirements. Based on the originator’s analysis of the real property collateral, the borrower and the principals of the borrower, a borrower under a commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community mortgage loan may be required to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, replacement reserves, tenant improvements/leasing commissions, deferred maintenance and/or environmental remediation. A case-by-case analysis will be conducted to determine the need for a particular escrow or reserve. Consequently, the aforementioned escrows and reserves are not established for every commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loan originated by
294
CCRE Lending. Furthermore, CCRE Lending may accept an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve from a borrower, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed. In some cases, CCRE Lending may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and CCRE Lending’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve. In some cases, CCRE Lending may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted because a tenant or other third party has agreed to pay the subject cost or expense for which the escrow or reserve would otherwise have been established.
Generally, subject to the discussion in the prior paragraph, the required escrows for commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loans originated by CCRE Lending are as follows:
● | Taxes—Monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy real estate taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional property sponsor or high net worth individual property sponsor, or (ii) if and to the extent that a sole or major tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is required to pay taxes directly. |
● | Insurance—Monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional property sponsor or high net worth individual property sponsor, (ii) if the related borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy, or (iii) if and to the extent that a sole or major tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is obligated to maintain the insurance or is permitted to self-insure. |
● | Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements by property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if a tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property or other third party is responsible for all repairs and maintenance, or (ii) if CCRE Lending determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and CCRE Lending’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the cost of repairs and maintenance absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
● | Tenant Improvements / Leasing Commissions—In the case of retail, office and industrial properties, a tenant improvements / leasing commissions reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by significant tenants, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, |
295
including, but not limited to, (i) if the related tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term, (ii) if the rent for the space in question is considered below market, or (iii) if CCRE Lending determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and CCRE Lending’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
● | Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount typically equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition or engineering report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) if the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property, (iii) if a tenant (which may include a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property or other third party is responsible for the repairs, or (iv) if CCRE Lending determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and CCRE Lending’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the cost of repairs absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
● | Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount typically equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues, (ii) if environmental insurance is obtained or already in place, (iii) if a third party unrelated to the borrower is identified as the responsible party or (iv) if CCRE Lending determines that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and CCRE Lending’s evaluation of the ability of the property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the cost of remediation absent creation of an escrow or reserve. |
For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the CCRE Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A-1.
Exceptions
The CCRE Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth above.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
CCRE Lending most recently filed a Form ABS-15G with the SEC pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 on February 10, 2017. CCRE Lending’s Central Index Key is 0001558761. With respect to the period from and including October 1, 2011 to and including June 30, 2017, CCRE Lending did not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
296
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither CCRE Lending nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, CCRE Lending or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.” has been provided by CCRE Lending.
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC
General
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed in April 2013 (“Rialto Mortgage”), is wholly-owned by Rialto Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was formed in August 2013. The executive offices of Rialto Mortgage are located at 600 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
In addition, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is (or, as of the Closing Date, is expected to be) the interim custodian with respect to the loan files for all of the Rialto Mortgage Loans.
Rialto Mortgage’s Securitization Program
As a sponsor and mortgage loan seller, Rialto Mortgage originates and acquires commercial real estate mortgage loans with a general focus on stabilized income-producing properties. All of the Mortgage Loans being sold to the depositor by Rialto Mortgage (the “Rialto Mortgage Loans”) were originated or co-originated by Rialto Mortgage. This is the fiftieth (50th) commercial real estate debt investment securitization to which Rialto Mortgage is contributing commercial real estate debt investments. The commercial real estate debt investments originated and acquired by Rialto Mortgage may include mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, B notes, participation interests, rake bonds, subordinate mortgage loans and preferred equity investments. Rialto Mortgage securitized approximately $712 million, $1.49 billion, $2.41 billion, $1.93 billion and $1.66 billion of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings during the calendar years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively.
Neither Rialto Mortgage nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the Certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against Rialto Mortgage for any losses or other claims in connection with the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or material breaches of representations and warranties made by Rialto Mortgage in the applicable MLPA as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis
Each of the Mortgage Loans originated by Rialto Mortgage was generally originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below. Each lending situation is unique, however, and the facts and circumstances surrounding a particular mortgage loan, such as the quality and location of the real estate collateral, the sponsorship of the borrower and the tenancy of the collateral, will impact the extent to which the general guidelines below are
297
applied to that specific loan. These underwriting criteria are general, and we cannot assure you that every loan will comply in all respects with the guidelines.
Loan Analysis. Generally, Rialto Mortgage performs both a credit analysis and collateral analysis with respect to a loan applicant and the real estate that will secure a mortgage loan. In general, the analysis of a borrower includes a review of money laundering and background checks and the analysis of its sponsor includes a review of money laundering and background checks, third-party credit reports, bankruptcy and lien searches, general banking references and commercial mortgage related references. In general, the analysis of the collateral includes a site visit and a review of the property’s historical operating statements (if available), independent market research, an appraisal with an emphasis on rental and sales comparables, engineering and environmental reports, the property’s historic and current occupancy, financial strengths of tenants, the duration and terms of tenant leases and the use of the property. Each report is reviewed for acceptability by a real estate finance credit officer of Rialto Mortgage. The borrower’s and property manager’s experience and presence in the subject market are also reviewed. Consideration is also given to anticipated changes in cash flow that may result from changes in lease terms or market considerations.
Borrowers are generally required to be single-purpose entities although they are generally not required to be structured to limit the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt unless the loan has a principal balance of greater than $30 million, in which case additional limitations including the requirement that the borrower have at least one independent director are required.
Loan Approval. All mortgage loans must be approved by a credit committee that includes two officers of Rialto Mortgage and one officer of Lennar Corporation. If deemed appropriate, a member of the real estate team will visit the subject property. The credit committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Property Analysis. Prior to origination of a loan, Rialto Mortgage typically performs, or causes to be performed, site inspections at each property. Depending on the property type, such inspections generally include an evaluation of one or more of the following: functionality, design, attractiveness, visibility and accessibility of the property as well as proximity to major thoroughfares, transportation centers, employment sources, retail areas, educational facilities and recreational areas. Such inspections generally assess the submarket in which the property is located, which may include evaluating competitive or comparable properties.
Appraisal and Loan-to-Value Ratio. Rialto Mortgage typically obtains an appraisal that complies, or is certified by the appraiser to comply, with the real estate appraisal regulations issued jointly by the federal bank regulatory agencies under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended. The loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage loan is generally based on the “as-is” value set forth in the appraisal. In certain cases, an updated appraisal is obtained.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio. In connection with the origination of an asset, Rialto Mortgage will analyze whether cash flow expected to be derived from the related real property will be sufficient to make the required payments under that transaction over its expected term, taking into account, among other things, revenues and expenses for, and other debt currently secured directly or indirectly by, or that in the future may be secured directly or indirectly by, the related real property. The debt service coverage ratio is an
298
important measure of the likelihood of default on a particular asset. In general, the debt service coverage ratio at any given time is the ratio of—
● | the amount of income, net of expenses and required reserves, derived or expected to be derived from the related real property for a given period, to |
● | the scheduled payments of principal and interest during that given period on the subject asset and any other loans that are secured by liens of senior or equal priority on, or otherwise have a senior or equal entitlement to be repaid from the income generated by, the related real property. |
However, the amount described in the first bullet of the preceding sentence is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property. Accordingly, based on such subjective assumptions and analysis, we cannot assure you that the underwriting analysis of any particular asset will conform to the foregoing in every respect or to any similar analysis which may be performed by other persons or entities. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a particular asset, Rialto Mortgage may utilize net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected rental income, expenses and/or occupancy. There is no assurance that such assumptions made with respect to any asset or the related real property will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance.
Generally, the debt service coverage ratio for assets originated by Rialto Mortgage, calculated as described above, will be subject to a minimum standard at origination (generally equal to or greater than 1.20x); however, exceptions may be made when consideration is given to circumstances particular to the asset, the related real property, the associated loan-to-value ratio (as described below), reserves or other factors. For example, Rialto Mortgage may originate an asset with a debt service coverage ratio below the minimum standard at origination based on, among other things, the amortization features of the overall debt structure, the type of tenants and leases at the related real property, the taking of additional collateral such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees, the profile of the borrower and its owners, Rialto Mortgage’s judgment of improved property and/or market performance in the future and/or other relevant factors.
Loan-to-Value Ratio. Rialto Mortgage also looks at the loan-to-value ratio of a prospective investment related to multi-family or commercial real estate as one of the factors it takes into consideration in evaluating the likelihood of recovery if a property is liquidated following a default. In general, the loan-to-value ratio of an asset related to multi-family or commercial real estate at any given time is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of:
● | the then-outstanding principal balance of the asset and any other loans that are secured (directly or indirectly) by liens of senior or equal priority on the related real property, to |
● | the estimated value of the related real property based on an appraisal, a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation. |
Generally, the loan-to-value ratio for assets originated by Rialto Mortgage, calculated as described above, will be subject to a maximum standard at origination (generally less than or equal to 80%); however, exceptions may be made when consideration is given to circumstances particular to the asset, the related real property, debt service coverage, reserves or other factors. For example, Rialto Mortgage may originate a multifamily or
299
commercial real estate loan with a loan-to-value ratio above the maximum standard at origination based on, among other things, the amortization features of the overall debt structure, the type of tenants and leases at the related real property, the taking of additional collateral such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees, the profile of the borrower and its owners, Rialto Mortgage’s judgment of improved property and/or market performance in the future and/or other relevant factors.
Additional Debt. When underwriting an asset, Rialto Mortgage will take into account whether the related real property and/or direct or indirect interest in a related borrower are encumbered by additional debt and will analyze the likely effect of that additional debt on repayment of the subject asset. It is possible that Rialto Mortgage or an affiliate will be the lender on that additional debt, and may either sell such debt to an unaffiliated third party or hold it for investment or future sale.
The debt service coverage ratios at origination described above under “—Debt Service Coverage Ratio” and the loan-to-value ratios at origination described above under “—Loan-to-Value Ratio” may be significantly below the minimum standard and/or significantly above the maximum standard, respectively, when calculated taking into account the existence of additional debt secured directly or indirectly by equity interests in the related borrower.
Assessments of Property Condition. As part of the origination and underwriting process, Rialto Mortgage will analyze the condition of the real property for a prospective asset. To aid in that analysis, Rialto Mortgage may, subject to certain exceptions, inspect or retain a third party to inspect the property and will in most cases obtain the property reports described below.
Appraisal Report. Rialto Mortgage will in most cases obtain an appraisal or an update of an existing appraisal from an independent appraiser that is state-certified, belonging to the Appraisal Institute, a membership association of professional real estate appraisers, or an otherwise qualified appraiser. The appraisal reports are conducted in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices and the appraisal report (or a separate letter accompanying the report) will include a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal report.
Environmental Report. Rialto Mortgage requires that an environmental consultant prepare a Phase I environmental report or that an update of a prior environmental report, a transaction screen or a desktop review is prepared with respect to the real property related to the asset. Alternatively, Rialto Mortgage may forego an environmental report in limited circumstances, such as when it has obtained the benefits of an environmental insurance policy or an environmental guarantee. Depending on the findings of the initial environmental report, Rialto Mortgage may require additional record searches or environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental report with respect to the subject real property. In certain cases where an environmental report discloses the existence of, or potential for, adverse environmental conditions, including as a result of the activities of identified tenants, adjacent property owners or previous owners of the subject real property, the related borrower may be required to establish operations and maintenance plans, monitor the real property, abate or remediate the condition and/or provide additional security such as letters of credit, reserves or environmental insurance policies.
Engineering Report. Rialto Mortgage generally requires that an engineering firm inspect the real property related to the asset to assess and prepare a report regarding the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure, mechanical systems and/or electrical systems. In some cases, engineering reports are based on, and limited to, information
300
available through visual inspection. Rialto Mortgage will consider the engineering report in connection with determining whether to address any recommended repairs, corrections or replacements in connection with origination and whether any identified deferred maintenance should be addressed in connection with origination. In some cases, Rialto Mortgage uses conclusions in the engineering reports in connection with making a determination about the necessity for escrows related to repairs and the continued maintenance of the real property.
Seismic Report. If the real property related to an asset consists of improvements located in seismic zones 3 or 4, Rialto Mortgage generally requires a seismic report from an engineering firm to establish the probable maximum or bounded loss for the improvements at the property as a result of an earthquake. Generally, if a seismic report concludes that the related real property is estimated to have a probably maximum loss or scenario expected loss in excess of 20%, Rialto Mortgage may require retrofitting of the improvements or that the borrower obtain earthquake insurance if available at a commercially reasonable price.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of an asset related to multifamily or commercial real estate, Rialto Mortgage will generally obtain one or more of the following to consider whether the use and occupancy of the related real property is in material compliance with zoning, land use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property: zoning reports, legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports and/or representations by the related borrower. In cases where the real property constitutes a legal nonconforming use or structure, Rialto Mortgage may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy and/or the acquisition of law and ordinance insurance with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild, (ii) the real property, if permitted to be repaired or restored in conformity with current law, would in Rialto Mortgage’s judgment constitute adequate security, (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring, (iv) a variance or other similar change in applicable zoning restrictions is potentially available, or the applicable governing entity is unlikely to enforce the related limitations, (v) casualty insurance proceeds together with the value of any additional collateral are expected to be available in an amount estimated by Rialto Mortgage to be sufficient to pay off all relevant indebtedness in full, and/or (vi) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement imposing recourse liability from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
Escrow Requirements. Based on its analysis of the related real property, the borrower and the principals of the borrower, Rialto Mortgage may require a borrower to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenses, replacement reserves, re-tenanting reserves, environmental remediation and/or other matters. Rialto Mortgage conducts a case-by-case analysis to determine the need for a particular escrow or reserve. Consequently, the underlying documents for some assets do not contain provisions requiring the establishment of escrows and reserves, or only require the establishment of escrows and reserves in limited amounts and/or circumstances. Furthermore, where escrows or reserves are required, Rialto Mortgage may accept an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve from a borrower, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed. In some cases, Rialto Mortgage may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and Rialto Mortgage’s evaluation of the
301
ability of the real property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve.
Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion, Rialto Mortgage may originate or acquire, and may have originated or acquired, real estate related loans and other investments that vary from, or do not comply with, Rialto Mortgage’s underwriting guidelines as described herein and/or such underwriting guidelines may not have been in place or may have been in place in a modified version at the time Rialto Mortgage or its affiliates originated or acquired certain assets. In addition, in some cases, Rialto Mortgage may not have strictly applied these underwriting guidelines as the result of a case-by-case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors.
Exceptions. Notwithstanding the discussion under “—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis” above, one or more of the Rialto Mortgage Loans may vary from, or not comply with, Rialto Mortgage’s underwriting policies and guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the Rialto Mortgage Loans, Rialto Mortgage or another originator may not have strictly applied the underwriting policies and guidelines described above as the result of a case-by-case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors. None of the Rialto Mortgage Loans were originated with any material exceptions to Rialto Mortgage’s underwriting policies, guidelines and procedures described above.
Review of Mortgage Loans for Which Rialto Mortgage is the Sponsor
Overview. Rialto Mortgage has conducted a review of each of the Rialto Mortgage Loans. This review was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of Rialto Mortgage or one or more of its affiliates (the “Rialto Mortgage Review Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to the Rialto Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process. Rialto Mortgage is the mortgage loan seller with respect to eight (8) Mortgage Loans.
Set forth below is a discussion of certain current general guidelines of Rialto Mortgage generally applicable with respect to Rialto Mortgage’s underwriting analysis of multi-family and commercial real estate properties which serve as the direct or indirect source of repayment for commercial real estate debt originated by Rialto Mortgage. All or a portion of the underwriting guidelines described below may not be applied exactly as described below at the time a particular asset is originated by Rialto Mortgage.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the Rialto Mortgage Review Team reviewed a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related mortgage loan documents, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Rialto Mortgage Review Team during the underwriting process. Prior to securitization of the Rialto Mortgage Loans, the Rialto Mortgage Review Team may have updated the information in the database with respect to the Rialto Mortgage Loans based on updates provided by the related servicer which may include information relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the Rialto Mortgage Review Team, to the extent such updates were provided to, and deemed material by, the Rialto Mortgage Review Team. Such updates, if any, were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of the Rialto Mortgage Loans. A data
302
tape (the “Rialto Mortgage Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans was created from the information in the database referred to above. The Rialto Mortgage Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of Rialto Mortgage, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by Rialto Mortgage and relating to information in this prospectus regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the Rialto Mortgage Data Tape against various source documents provided by Rialto Mortgage; |
● | comparing numerical information regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the information contained in the Rialto Mortgage Data Tape; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. Rialto Mortgage engaged legal counsel to conduct certain legal reviews of the Rialto Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization described in this prospectus, Rialto Mortgage’s origination counsel reviewed a form of securitization representations and warranties at origination and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties. Rialto Mortgage’s origination and underwriting staff also performed a review of the representations and warranties.
Legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization to assist in the review of the Rialto Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of certain of Rialto Mortgage’s asset summary reports, (ii) the review of the representations and warranties and exception reports referred to above relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, (iii) the review of, and assistance in the completion by the Rialto Mortgage Review Team of, a due diligence questionnaire relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans and (iv) the review of certain provisions in loan documents with respect to the Rialto Mortgage Loans.
Other Review Procedures. The Rialto Mortgage Review Team, with the assistance of counsel engaged in connection with this securitization, also reviewed each Rialto Mortgage Loan to determine whether it materially deviated from the underwriting guidelines set forth under “—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis” above.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, Rialto Mortgage determined that the disclosure regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. Rialto Mortgage also determined that the Rialto Mortgage Loans were not originated with any material exceptions from Rialto Mortgage’s underwriting guidelines and procedures, except as described above under “—Rialto Mortgage’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis—Exceptions” above. Rialto Mortgage attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. Rialto Mortgage will perform a review of any Rialto Mortgage Loan that it elects to substitute for a Rialto Mortgage Loan in the pool in connection with material breach of a representation or warranty or a material document defect. Rialto Mortgage, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the mortgage loan documents and servicing history of the substitute
303
mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related MLPA and the PSA (the “Rialto Qualification Criteria”). Rialto Mortgage will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the Rialto Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by Rialto Mortgage and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by Rialto Mortgage to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
Rialto Mortgage most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on February 2, 2018. Rialto Mortgage’s Central Index Key number is 0001592182. With respect to the period from and including January 1, 2015 to and including December 31, 2017, Rialto Mortgage does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither Rialto Mortgage nor any of its affiliates will retain on the Closing Date any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, Rialto Mortgage or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC” has been provided by Rialto Mortgage.
CIBC Inc.
General
CIBC Inc. (“CIBC”), a Delaware corporation whose principal office is located in New York, New York, is a sponsor and mortgage loan seller in this transaction. CIBC is an affiliate of CIBC World Markets Corp., an underwriter for the offering of the offered certificates. CIBC is a majority owned subsidiary of Canadian Imperial Holdings Inc. Canadian Imperial Holdings Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIBC Delaware Holdings Inc., also a Delaware corporation, which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce is a bank chartered under the Bank Act of Canada, having its head office in the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, Canada. It is licensed to do business in the United States through its agency located in New York, New York.
CIBC’s Commercial Mortgage Securitization Program
CIBC underwrites and originates mortgage loans secured by commercial or multifamily properties for its securitization program. As sponsor, CIBC sells the mortgage loans it originates through commercial mortgage-backed securitizations. CIBC began originating commercial and multifamily mortgage loans for securitization in 1997 and began securitizing commercial and multifamily mortgage loans in 1998. In 2010, CIBC formed a joint venture with BSSF Commercial Mortgage Member L.L.C. (“BSSF”) to originate and/or acquire and securitize fixed rate commercial and multifamily mortgage loans and invest in certain classes of the securities issued in those securitizations. The joint venture is CIBX
304
Commercial Mortgage, LLC (“CIBX”), a Delaware limited liability company, and CIBC managed the origination and securitization process of CIBX. As of December 31, 2017, the total amount (by principal balance at the cut-off of the related securitization) of commercial mortgage loans originated and securitized by CIBC (exclusive of its services on behalf of CIBX) is in excess of $21.5 billion. In the calendar year ended December 31, 2017, CIBC originated approximately $388,365,000 of commercial mortgage loans and securitized approximately $317,934,608 of commercial mortgage loans.
The commercial mortgage loans originated or acquired by CIBC are fixed rate loans and include both smaller “conduit” loans and large loans. CIBC primarily originates mortgage loans secured by retail, office, multifamily, hospitality, industrial and self-storage properties, but also can originate mortgage loans secured by manufactured housing communities, theaters, land subject to a ground lease and mixed use properties. CIBC originates loans in the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
As a sponsor, CIBC originates or acquires mortgage loans and, either by itself or together with other sponsors or mortgage loan sellers, intends to initiate their securitization by transferring the mortgage loans to a depositor, which in turn transfers them to the trust for the related securitization. In coordination with its affiliate, CIBC World Markets Corp., and other underwriters, CIBC works with rating agencies, investors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers in structuring the securitization transactions. CIBC acts as sponsor, originator or mortgage loan seller in transactions in which other entities act as sponsor and/or mortgage loan seller. Some of these mortgage loan sellers may be affiliated with underwriters on the transactions.
Neither CIBC nor any of its affiliates acts as master servicer of the commercial mortgage loans in its securitizations. Instead, CIBC sells the right to be appointed master servicer of its securitized mortgage loans to rating-agency approved master servicers.
For a description of certain affiliations, relationships and related transactions between CIBC, as sponsor, and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties” in this prospectus.
CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
Overview. Each of the CIBC mortgage loans was originated by CIBC. Set forth below is a discussion of certain general underwriting guidelines and processes with respect to the mortgage loans originated by CIBC for securitization.
However, given the unique nature of income-producing real properties, variations from these procedures and guidelines may be implemented as a result of various conditions, including a CIBC mortgage loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the mortgaged property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower or sponsor and any other pertinent information deemed material by CIBC. Therefore, this general description of CIBC’s origination procedures and underwriting guidelines is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated or purchased by it (or on its behalf) complies entirely with all guidelines set forth below. For important information about the circumstances that have affected the underwriting of particular CIBC mortgage loans, see “—Exceptions to CIBC’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” below.
Loan Analysis. Generally both a credit analysis and a collateral analysis are conducted with respect to each mortgage loan. The credit analysis of the borrower generally includes a review of third party credit reports and/or judgment, lien, bankruptcy and pending
305
litigation searches, prior experience as an owner and operator of commercial real estate properties and the borrower’s financial capacity. The collateral analysis generally includes a review of, in each case to the extent available and applicable, the historical property operating statements, rent rolls and certain significant tenant leases. The credit underwriting also generally includes a review of third party appraisals, as well as environmental reports, engineering assessments and seismic reports, if applicable and obtained. Generally, the originator also conducts or causes a third party to conduct a site inspection to ascertain the overall quality, functionality and competitiveness of the property, including its neighborhood and market, accessibility and visibility, and to assess the tenancy of the property. The submarket in which the property is located is assessed to evaluate competitive or comparable properties as well as market trends.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio. The underwriting includes a calculation of debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio in connection with the origination of each mortgage loan. CIBC’s underwriting guidelines generally require, without regard to any other debt, a debt service coverage ratio (calculated for this purpose using a 30-year amortization term) of not less than 1.25x and a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 75%; however, these thresholds are guidelines, and exceptions may be made based on the merits of each individual mortgage loan, such as the types of tenants, reserves, letters of credit, guarantees and CIBC’s assessment of the mortgaged property’s future performance. The debt service coverage ratio guidelines set forth above are calculated based on underwritten net cash flow at origination. The debt service coverage ratio for each mortgage loan as reported in this prospectus and Annex A-1 hereto may differ from the amount calculated at the time of origination because updates to the information used to calculate such amounts may have become available during the period between origination and the date of this prospectus.
The debt service coverage ratio will generally be calculated based on the ratio of the underwritten net cash flow from the property in question as determined by CIBC and payments on the loan based on actual (or, in some cases, assumed) principal and/or interest due on the mortgage loan. However, underwritten net cash flow is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property collateral. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan, annual net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected future rental income, expenses and/or occupancy may be utilized. There is no assurance that the foregoing assumptions made with respect to any prospective multifamily or commercial mortgage loan will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance. As described above, for the purpose of determining whether a mortgage loan’s debt service coverage ratio meets CIBC’s underwriting criteria, the debt service coverage ratio is calculated based on a debt service payment using a 30-year amortization term, however if a loan’s debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.25x because its debt service payment is calculated on an amortization schedule less than 30 years but its debt service coverage ratio calculated using a 30-year amortization term is equal to or greater than 1.25x, that loan meets CIBC’s underwriting criteria for debt service coverage ratio. The loan-to-value ratio, in general, is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the then-outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan divided by the estimated value of the related property based on an appraisal. In addition, with respect to certain mortgage loans, there may exist subordinate mortgage debt or mezzanine debt. Such mortgage loans will have a lower combined debt service coverage ratio and/or a higher combined loan-to-value ratio when such subordinate or mezzanine debt is taken into account. Additionally, certain mortgage loans may provide for interest only payments prior to maturity, or for an interest-only period during a portion of the term of the mortgage loan.
306
Additional Debt. Certain mortgage loans may have or permit in the future certain additional subordinate debt, whether secured or unsecured, and/or mezzanine debt.
The debt service coverage ratios described above will be lower based on the inclusion of the payments related to such additional debt and the loan-to-value ratios described above will be higher based on the inclusion of the amount of any such additional subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt.
Mortgage Loan Terms. CIBC’s underwriting guidelines generally require that the term of a mortgage loan be not less than five years and not more than ten years.
Escrow Requirements. CIBC may require borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves, which reserves in many instances will be limited to certain capped amounts. In addition, CIBC may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items such as leasing-related matters, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, which escrows or holdbacks would be released upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all commercial mortgage loans originated by CIBC. The typical required escrows for mortgage loans originated by CIBC are as follows:
● | Taxes. An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to approximately 1/12 of the estimated annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide CIBC with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. CIBC may not require this escrow in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, situations where: (i) the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant pays taxes directly (or CIBC may not require the escrow for a portion of the mortgaged property which is leased to a tenant that pays taxes for its portion of the mortgaged property directly); or (ii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
● | Insurance. An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to approximately 1/12 of the estimated annual property insurance premium are required to provide CIBC with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. CIBC may not require this escrow in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, situations where: (i) the borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy; (ii) the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant) and the tenant maintains the property insurance or self-insures (or may not require the escrow for a portion of the mortgaged property which is leased to a tenant that maintains property insurance for its portion of the mortgaged property or self-insures); (iii) the borrower agrees to escrow and maintain a “static” reserve in the amount equal to the aggregate amount of a fixed number of monthly escrow deposit amounts; or (iv) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
● | Replacement Reserves. Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the mortgaged property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements by property type. CIBC may not require this escrow in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, situations where: (i) the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single |
307
tenant) and the tenant or another third party is responsible for the repairs and maintenance of the mortgaged property (or may not require the escrow for a portion of the mortgaged property which is leased to a tenant that repairs and maintains its portion of the mortgaged property); or (ii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
● | Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions. A tenant improvement/leasing commission reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term and/or springing upon certain tenant events to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions, free rent periods or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by such tenants. CIBC may not require this escrow in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, situations where: (i) the mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to single tenant), with a lease that extends beyond the loan term; (ii) the rent for the space in question is considered below market; or (iii) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
● | Deferred Maintenance. A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition or engineering report. CIBC may not require this escrow in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, situations where: (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs; (ii) the deferred maintenance items do not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property; (iii) the deferred maintenance cost does not exceed $50,000; (iv) a tenant (which may include a ground lease tenant) at the related mortgaged property or other third party is responsible for the repairs; or (v) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
● | Environmental Remediation. An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report. CIBC may not require this escrow in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, situations where: (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to complete the remediation; (ii) environmental insurance is in place or obtained; (iii) a third party unrelated to the borrower is identified as the responsible party; or (iv) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances exist. |
CIBC may determine that establishing any of the foregoing escrows or reserves is not warranted in one or more of the following instances (collectively, the “Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances”): (i) the amounts involved are de minimis, (ii) the ability of the mortgaged property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve, (iii) based on the mortgaged property maintaining a specified debt service coverage ratio, (iv) CIBC has structured springing escrows that arise for identified risks, (v) CIBC has an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed, (vi) CIBC believes there are credit positive characteristics of the borrower, the sponsor of the borrower and/or the mortgaged property that would offset the need for the escrow or reserve, (vi) the reserves are being collected and held by a third party, such as a management company, a franchisor, or an association or (vii) a tenant or other third party has agreed to pay the subject cost or expense for which the escrow or reserve would otherwise have been established.
308
For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the CIBC mortgage loans, please see Annex A-1.
Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan, the originator will examine whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that real property collateral. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: a zoning report, legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports and/or representations by the related borrower.
In some cases, a mortgaged property may constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure. In those cases, CIBC may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy or the acquisition of law and ordinance insurance with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild; (ii) if the improvements are rebuilt in accordance with currently applicable law, the value and performance of the mortgaged property would be acceptable; (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring; or (iv) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
If a material violation exists with respect to a mortgaged property, CIBC may require the borrower to remediate that violation and, subject to the discussion under “—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Escrow Requirements” above, to establish a reserve to cover the cost of such remediation, unless a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.
Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and CIBC reviews, a title insurance policy for each mortgaged property. The title insurance policy must meet the following requirements: (a) the policy must be written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located; (b) the policy must be in an amount equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan; (c) the protection and benefits must run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns; (d) the policy should be written on a standard policy form of the American Land Title Association or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located; and (e) the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy must conform to that shown on the survey of the mortgaged property, where a survey has been required.
Property Insurance. Except in certain instances where sole or significant tenants (which may include ground lease tenants) are required to obtain insurance or may self-insure, the borrower is required to provide, and CIBC’s insurance consultant reviews, certificates of required insurance with respect to the mortgaged property. Such insurance may include: (1) commercial general liability insurance for bodily injury or death and property damage; (2) a fire and extended perils insurance policy providing “special” form coverage including coverage against loss or damage by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion; (3) if applicable, boiler and machinery coverage; (4) if the mortgaged property is located in a flood hazard area, flood insurance; and (5) such other coverage as CIBC may require based on the specific characteristics of the mortgaged property.
Third Party Reports. In addition to or as part of applicable origination guidelines or reviews described above, in the course of originating the CIBC mortgage loans, CIBC generally considered the results of third party reports as described below. New reports are
309
generally ordered, although existing reports dated no more than twelve (12) months prior to closing may be used (subject, in certain cases, to updates).
● | Appraisals. Independent appraisals or an update of an independent appraisal will generally be required in connection with the origination of each mortgage loan. Each appraisal must meet the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, or the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. The appraisal is based on the current use of the mortgaged property and must include an estimate of the then-current market value of the property “as-is” in its then-current condition although in certain cases, CIBC may also obtain a value on an “as-stabilized” basis reflecting leases that have been executed but tenants have not commenced paying rent or on an “as-completed” basis reflecting completion of capital improvements that are being undertaken at the mortgaged property. In some cases, however, the value of the subject real property collateral may be established based on a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation. CIBC then determines the loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage loan in each case based on the value set forth in the appraisal. |
● | Environmental Assessment. In most cases, a Phase I environmental site assessment (“ESA”) will be required with respect to the real property collateral for each mortgage loan. However, when circumstances warrant, an update of a prior environmental assessment, a transaction screen or a desktop review may be utilized. Furthermore, an ESA conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead-based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when the originator or an environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances. Depending on the findings of the initial ESA, additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment with respect to the subject real property collateral may be required. In cases in which the ESA identifies conditions that would require cleanup, remedial action or any other response, CIBC either (i) determines that another party with sufficient assets is responsible for taking remedial actions directed by an applicable regulatory authority or (ii) requires the borrower to do one of the following: (A) carry out satisfactory remediation activities or other responses prior to the origination of the mortgage loan, (B) establish an operations and maintenance plan, (C) place sufficient funds in escrow or establish a letter of credit at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such remediation within a specified period of time, (D) obtain an environmental insurance policy for the mortgaged property, (E) provide or obtain an indemnity agreement or a guaranty with respect to such condition or circumstance or (F) receive appropriate assurances that significant remediation activities or other significant responses are not necessary or required. |
● | Certain of the mortgage loans may also have environmental insurance policies. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses” above. |
● | Engineering Assessment. In connection with the origination process, in most cases, it will be required that an engineering firm inspect the real property collateral for any prospective mortgage loan to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/or mechanical and electrical systems. Based on the resulting report, the appropriate response will be determined to any recommended repairs, |
310
corrections or replacements and any identified deferred maintenance. In cases in which the engineering assessment identifies material repairs or replacements needed immediately, CIBC generally requires the borrower to carry out such repairs or replacements prior to the origination of the mortgage loan, or, in many cases, requires the borrower to place sufficient funds in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements within not more than twelve months. In certain instances, CIBC may waive such escrows but require the related borrower to complete such repairs within a stated period of time in the related mortgage loan documents. |
● | Seismic Report. Generally, a seismic report is required for all properties located in seismic zone 3 or 4. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, engineering inspections and seismic reports may not be required or obtained by the originator in connection with the origination process in the case of mortgage loans secured by real properties that are subject to a ground lease, triple-net lease or other long term lease, or in the case of mortgage loans that are not collateralized by any material improvements on the real property collateral.
Exceptions to CIBC’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines
One or more of the mortgage loans originated by CIBC may vary from the specific CIBC underwriting guidelines described above when additional credit positive characteristics are present as discussed above. In addition, in the case of one or more of CIBC’s mortgage loans, CIBC or another originator may not have applied each of the specific underwriting guidelines described above as the result of case-by-case permitted flexibility based upon other compensating factors. None of the CIBC mortgage loans was originated with any material exceptions from CIBC’s underwriting guidelines and procedures.
Review of CIBC Mortgage Loans
General. In connection with the preparation of this prospectus, CIBC conducted a review of the mortgage loans that it is selling to the depositor designed and effected to provide reasonable assurance that the disclosure related to the CIBC mortgage loans is accurate in all material respects. The review of the CIBC mortgage loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of one or more of CIBC’s affiliates (including CIBC), or, in certain circumstances, are consultants engaged by CIBC (the “CIBC Deal Team”). CIBC determined the nature, extent and timing of the review and the level of assistance provided by any third party. CIBC has ultimate authority and control over, and assumes all responsibility for and attributes to itself, the review and the findings and conclusions of the review of the mortgage loans that it is selling to the depositor. The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the CIBC mortgage loans, except that certain review procedures were only relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the CIBC Deal Team updated CIBC’s internal origination database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each CIBC mortgage loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related mortgage loan documents, third party appraisals (as well as environmental reports, engineering assessments and seismic reports, if applicable and obtained), zoning reports, if applicable, evidence of insurance coverage or summaries of the same prepared by an outside insurance consultant, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by CIBC
311
during the underwriting process. After origination or acquisition of each CIBC mortgage loan, the CIBC Deal Team updated the information in the database with respect to such CIBC mortgage loan based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the CIBC Deal Team.
CIBC created a data file (the “CIBC Data File”) containing detailed information regarding each CIBC mortgage loan from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The CIBC Data File was used by the CIBC Deal Team to provide the numerical information regarding the CIBC mortgage loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of CIBC, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures, which were designed by CIBC, relating to CIBC mortgage loan information in this prospectus. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the CIBC Data File against various source documents provided by CIBC that are described above under “—Database”; |
● | comparing numerical information regarding the CIBC mortgage loans and the related mortgaged properties disclosed in this prospectus against the information contained in the CIBC Data File; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the CIBC mortgage loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. CIBC engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the CIBC mortgage loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each CIBC mortgage loan, origination counsel assisted in completion of certain due diligence questionnaires designed to identify certain material deviations from mortgage loan disclosures in this prospectus. In addition, origination counsel for each CIBC mortgage loan reviewed CIBC’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex D-1 and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.
Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the CIBC mortgage loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of sections of the loan agreement relating to certain CIBC mortgage loans marked against the standard form document, and (ii) a review of due diligence questionnaires completed by the CIBC Deal Team and origination counsel. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions, if any, for each CIBC mortgage loan with multiple mortgaged properties for compliance with the REMIC provisions.
Origination counsel and securitization counsel also assisted in the preparation of the risk factors and mortgage loan summaries set forth in Annex A-3, based on their respective reviews of pertinent sections of the related mortgage loan documents.
Certain Updates. On a case-by-case basis as deemed necessary by CIBC, with respect to any pending litigation that existed at the origination of any CIBC mortgage loan that is material and not covered by insurance, CIBC requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. CIBC confirmed with the related servicer that there has not been recent material casualty to any improvements located on real property that serves as collateral for CIBC mortgage loans. In addition, if CIBC became aware of a significant natural disaster in the immediate vicinity of any mortgaged property securing a CIBC mortgage loan, CIBC obtained information on the status of the mortgaged
312
property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the mortgaged property.
Underwriting Standards. The CIBC Deal Team also consulted with CIBC personnel responsible for the origination of the CIBC mortgage loans to confirm that the CIBC mortgage loans were originated or acquired in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described above under “—CIBC’s Underwriting Guidelines and Processes”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria. See “—Exceptions to CIBC’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines” above in this prospectus.
Findings and Conclusions. CIBC found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the disclosure regarding the CIBC mortgage loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. CIBC also found and concluded with reasonable assurance that the CIBC mortgage loans were originated in accordance with CIBC’s origination procedures and underwriting standards, except to the extent described above under “—Exceptions to CIBC’s Disclosed Underwriting Guidelines.”
Repurchases and Replacements
CIBC filed its most recent Form ABS-15G pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1 with the SEC on February 12, 2018, which covers the period from and including October 1, 2017 to and including December 31, 2017. CIBC’s CIK number is 0001548567. With respect to the period from and including January 1, 2015 to and including December 31, 2017, the following table provides information required by Rule 15Ga-1 regarding repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by CIBC as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.
313
Repurchases and Replacements Asset Class: Commercial Mortgages
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of Issuing Entity | Check if Registered | Name of Originator | Total Assets in ABS by Originator | Assets That Were Subject of Demand1 | Assets
That Were Repurchased or Replaced1 |
Assets Pending Repurchase or Replacement (within cure period)1 | Demand in Dispute1 | Demand Withdrawn1 | Demand Rejected1 | ||||||||||||||
# | $ | % of principal balance | # | $ | % of principal balance | # | $ | % of principal balance | # | $ | % of principal balance | # | $ | % of principal balance | # | $ | % of principal balance | # | $ | % of principal balance | |||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (k) | (l) | (m) | (n) | (o) | (p) | (q) | (r) | (s) | (t) | (u) | (v) | (w) | (x) |
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2002-C3 (CIK # 0001209655) | X | CIBC Inc. | 26 | 255,720,442 | 100 | 1 | 10,718,582 | 4.47 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 10,718,582 | 4.47 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.002,3 |
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-CIBC8 (CIK # 0001283891) | X | CIBC Inc. | 45 | 528,766,659 | 100 | 1 | 19,884,852 | 52.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 19,884,852 | 52.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
1. | The
repurchase activity included herein as assets subject to demand (columns g/h/i) includes
new demands received during the reporting period, if any, and demands received in prior
reporting periods. Each asset included as an asset subject to demand (columns g/h/i)
is also categorized and included as an asset pending repurchase or replacement within
the cure period (columns m/n/o) or as a demand in dispute (columns p/q/r), as applicable,
until the earlier of the reporting of (i) the repurchase or replacement of such asset
(columns j/k/l), (ii) the withdrawal of such demand (columns s/t/u) or (iii) the rejection
of such demand (columns v/w/x), as applicable. The repurchase activity reported herein is described in terms of a particular loan’s status as of the end of the reporting period (for columns g-x). The principal balances presented and used for calculations of percentages presented are principal balances as reported on trustee’s reports and servicer’s reports. The principal balances on those reports may reflect reductions based on the principal portion of any servicer advances that may have been made with respect to the related loan(s). |
2. | The asset subject to the repurchase request was liquidated during, or prior to, the reporting period. For each asset that was paid off or liquidated during, or prior to, the reporting period, the outstanding principal balance is calculated as of the time of payoff or liquidation, and the percentage of principal balance is calculated by dividing the outstanding principal balance by the total CIBC pool balance as of the immediately preceding trustee’s report. |
3. | At the conclusion of the trial based on the claim for repurchase, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois (the “Circuit Court”) entered a judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA, as trustee for the registered holders of J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2002-C3 holding that CIBC Inc. breached the representation in question. Because the asset subject to the repurchase request had already been liquidated, no repurchase was required, and damages were awarded in an amount equal to the repurchase price under the contract. The parties appealed, and on February 25, 2015, the Appellate Court of Illinois First Judicial District affirmed the Circuit Court’s judgment in its entirety. On July 21, 2015, CIBC Inc. made a payment to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA in satisfaction of such judgment, excluding post-judgment legal costs incurred by Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA and owed by CIBC Inc., payment for which Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA must petition. CIBC Inc., Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA and the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee appointed in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of the related mortgagor filed a Plan of Liquidation with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado on December 1, 2017, which, if approved, will extinguish any claim that Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA has against CIBC Inc. for post-judgment legal costs. |
314
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither CIBC nor any of its affiliates will retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, CIBC or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such certificates at any time.
The information set forth under “—CIBC Inc.” has been provided by CIBC.
Barclays Bank PLC
General
Barclays Bank PLC, a public limited company registered in England and Wales under number 1026167 (“Barclays”), a sponsor and a mortgage loan seller, is an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters. The principal offices of Barclays in the United States are located at 745 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019, telephone number (212) 412-4000.
Barclays’ Securitization Program
As a sponsor, Barclays originates or acquires mortgage loans and initiates a securitization transaction by selecting the portfolio of mortgage loans to be securitized and transferring those mortgage loans to a securitization depositor who in turn transfers those mortgage loans to the issuing entity. In selecting a portfolio to be securitized, consideration is given to geographic concentration, property type concentration and rating agency models and criteria. Barclays’ role also includes leading and participating in the selection of third-party service providers such as the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator, and engaging the rating agencies. In coordination with the underwriters for the related offering, Barclays works with rating agencies, investors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers in structuring the securitization transaction.
Barclays has been engaged in commercial mortgage loan securitization in the United States since 2004. The vast majority of commercial mortgage loans originated by Barclays are intended to be either sold through securitization transactions in which Barclays acts as a sponsor or sold to third parties in individual loan sale transactions. The following is a general description of the types of commercial mortgage loans that Barclays originates for securitization:
● | Fixed rate mortgage loans generally having maturities between five and ten years and secured by commercial real estate such as office, retail, hospitality, multifamily, manufactured housing, healthcare, self storage and industrial properties. These loans are primarily originated for the purpose of securitization. |
● | Floating rate loans generally having shorter maturities and secured by stabilized and non-stabilized commercial real estate properties. These loans are primarily originated for securitization, though in certain cases only a senior interest in the loan is intended to be securitized. |
● | Subordinate mortgage loans and mezzanine loans. These loans are generally not originated for securitization and are sold in individual loan sale transactions. In general, Barclays does not hold the loans it originates until maturity. |
315
Neither Barclays nor any of its affiliates act as servicer of the commercial mortgage loans in its securitization transactions. Instead, Barclays contracts with other entities to service the mortgage loans in the securitization transactions.
Barclays’ affiliates commenced selling commercial mortgage loans into U.S. securitizations in 2004. During the period commencing in 2004 and ending on December 21, 2017, Barclays’ affiliates were the loan sellers in approximately 95 commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions. Approximately $28.9 billion of the mortgage loans included in those transactions were originated or acquired by Barclays.
The following table sets forth information with respect to originations and securitizations of fixed rate and floating rate commercial and multifamily mortgage loans by Barclays affiliates for the years ending on December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and through December 21, 2017.
Fixed and Floating Rate Commercial Loans
Year |
Aggregate
Principal Balance of | |
2018 | $ | 0 |
2017 | $ | 4,971,606,254 |
2016 | $ | 3,031,242,500 |
2015 | $ | 5,276,099,519 |
2014 | $ | 3,351,106,750 |
2013 | $ | 2,723,393,594 |
2012 | $ | 2,056,096,250 |
2011 | $ | 0 |
2010 | $ | 0 |
2009 | $ | 0 |
2008 | $ | 196,399,012 |
2007 | $ | 2,470,879,020 |
Review of Barclays Mortgage Loans
Overview. Barclays has conducted a review of the mortgage loans for which Barclays is a sponsor in this securitization (the “Barclays Mortgage Loans”) in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus. The review of the Barclays Mortgage Loans was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals at Barclays’ offices (the “Barclays Review Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the Barclays Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.
Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the Barclays Review Team created a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each Barclays Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related loan documents, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, seismic studies, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Barclays Review Team during the underwriting process. After origination of each Barclays Mortgage Loan, the Barclays Review Team updated the information in the database with respect to such Barclays Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the
316
related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the Barclays Review Team.
A data tape (the “Barclays Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each Barclays Mortgage Loan was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The Barclays Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans in this prospectus.
Data Comparison and Recalculation. The depositor, on behalf of Barclays, engaged a third party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures, the nature, extent and timing of which were designed by Barclays, relating to information in this prospectus regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:
● | comparing the information in the Barclays Data Tape against various source documents provided by Barclays that are described above under “—Database”; |
● | comparing numerical information regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus against the Barclays Data Tape; and |
● | recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the Barclays Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus. |
Legal Review. Barclays and the other originators of the Barclays Mortgage Loans engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the Barclays Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus. In anticipation of the securitization of each Barclays Mortgage Loan, Barclays’ and the other originators’ origination counsel reviewed a form of securitization representations and warranties at origination and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties. Barclays’ and the other originators’ origination and underwriting staff also performed a review of the representations and warranties.
Legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization to assist in the review of the Barclays Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of Barclays’ asset summary reports for each Barclays Mortgage Loan, (ii) a review of the representations and warranties and exception reports referred to above relating to the Barclays Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, (iii) the review and assistance in the completion by the Barclays Review Team of a due diligence questionnaire relating to the Barclays Mortgage Loans and (iv) the review of certain loan documents with respect to the Barclays Mortgage Loans.
Other Review Procedures. With respect to any material pending litigation of which Barclays was aware at the origination of any Barclays Mortgage Loan, Barclays requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel.
The Barclays Review Team, with the assistance of counsel engaged in connection with this securitization, also reviewed the Barclays Mortgage Loans to determine whether any Barclays Mortgage Loan materially deviated from the underwriting guidelines set forth under “—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions” below.
Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, Barclays determined that the disclosure regarding the Barclays Mortgage Loans in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. Barclays also determined that the Barclays Mortgage
317
Loans were originated in accordance with Barclays’ origination procedures and underwriting criteria, except as described under “—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes—Exceptions” below. Barclays attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.
Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. Barclays will perform a review of any mortgage loan that it elects to substitute for a mortgage loan in the pool in connection with a material breach of a representation or warranty or a material document defect. Barclays, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the mortgage loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related mortgage loan purchase agreement and the pooling and servicing agreement (“Barclays’ Qualification Criteria”). Barclays will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the Barclays’ Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by Barclays and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by Barclays to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.
Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Processes
After review and participation in the pre-closing due diligence and closing process by Barclays, each of the Barclays Mortgage Loans was generally originated in accordance with the underwriting criteria described below. Each lending situation is unique, however, and the facts and circumstances surrounding a particular mortgage loan, such as the quality and location of the real estate collateral, the sponsorship of the borrower and the tenancy of the collateral, will impact the extent to which the general guidelines below are applied to that specific loan. These underwriting criteria are general, and we cannot assure you that every loan will comply in all respects with the guidelines. For additional information with respect to exceptions to the underwriting guidelines, see “—Exceptions” below. Barclays originates mortgage loans principally for securitization.
General. Barclays originates commercial mortgage loans from its headquarters in New York and its West Coast office. Barclays also originates and acquires loans pursuant to table funding arrangements through third party origination platforms that have origination offices in additional locations. Bankers at Barclays and at table funded lenders focus on sourcing, structuring, underwriting and performing due diligence on their loans. Structured finance bankers work closely with the loans’ originators to ensure that the loans are suitable for securitization and satisfy rating agency criteria. All mortgage loans, including those originated by table funded lenders, must be approved by Barclays’ credit department, as described below under “—Loan Approval”.
With respect to certain mortgage loans, Barclays has delegated certain of its underwriting and origination functions to table funded lenders, subject to loan-by-loan oversight and ultimate review and approval by Barclays’ professionals. These functions were all performed in substantial accordance with the mortgage loan approval procedures described in this prospectus. In all cases, mortgage loans are documented on Barclays’ approved documentation.
Loan Analysis. Generally, Barclays performs both a credit analysis and collateral analysis with respect to a loan applicant and the real estate that will secure a mortgage loan. In general, the analysis of a borrower includes a review of anti-money laundering or OFAC checks, as well as background checks and the analysis of its loan sponsor includes a review of money laundering and background checks, third-party credit reports, bankruptcy and lien searches, general banking references and commercial mortgage related references.
318
In general, the analysis of the collateral includes a site visit and a review of the property’s historical operating statements (if available), independent market research, an appraisal with an emphasis on rental and sales comparables, engineering and environmental reports, the property’s historic and current occupancy, financial strengths of tenants, the duration and terms of tenant leases and the use of the property. Each report is reviewed for acceptability by a real estate finance loan underwriter. The borrower’s and property manager’s experience and presence in the subject market are also reviewed. Consideration is also given to anticipated changes in cash flow that may result from changes in lease terms or market considerations.
Borrowers are generally required to be single purpose entities although they are generally not required to be structured to reduce the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt unless the loan has a principal balance of greater than $20 million, in which case additional limitations including the requirement that the borrower have at least one independent director are required.
Loan Approval. All mortgage loans originated or table funded by Barclays must be approved by a credit committee. The credit committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio and LTV Ratio. Barclays’ underwriting standards generally mandate minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum loan-to-value ratios. A loan-to-value ratio, generally based upon the appraiser’s determination of value as well as the value derived using a stressed capitalization rate, is considered. The debt service coverage ratio is based upon the underwritten net cash flow and is given particular importance. However, notwithstanding such guidelines, in certain circumstances the actual debt service coverage ratios, loan-to-value ratios and amortization periods for the mortgage loans originated by Barclays may vary from these guidelines.
Escrow Requirements. Generally, Barclays requires most borrowers to fund escrows for expenses such as taxes and insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves, in some cases upon the occurrence of a trigger event. In the case of certain hotel loans, FF&E reserves may be held by the franchisor or manager rather than the lender. Generally, the required escrows for mortgage loans originated or acquired by Barclays are as follows (see Annex A-1 for instances in which reserves were not taken):
● | Taxes – Typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12 of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances including, but not limited to, (i) where a tenant is required to pay the taxes directly, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (iv) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
● | Insurance – If the property is insured under an individual policy (i.e., the property is not covered by a blanket policy), typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12 of the annual property insurance premium are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where a property is covered by a blanket insurance policy maintained by the borrower or loan sponsor, (ii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iii) where an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is |
319
responsible for paying all insurance premiums, (iv) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to a single tenant) and the tenant maintains the property insurance or self-insures (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that maintains property insurance for its portion of the Mortgaged Property), (v) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (vi) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
● | Replacement Reserves – Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan plus two years. Barclays relies on information provided by an independent engineer to make this determination. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is responsible for replacements under the terms of its lease, (ii) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to a single tenant) and the tenant repairs and maintains the Mortgaged Property (or may waive the escrow for a portion of the Mortgaged Property which is leased to a tenant that repairs and maintains its portion of the Mortgaged Property), (iii) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (iv) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (v) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
● | Completion Repair/Environmental Remediation – Typically, a completion repair or remediation reserve is required where an environmental or engineering report suggests that such reserve is necessary. Upon funding of the applicable mortgage loan, Barclays generally requires that at least 100% – 125% of the estimated costs of repairs or replacements be reserved and generally requires that repairs or replacements be completed within a year after the funding of the applicable mortgage loan. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where a secured creditor insurance policy or borrower insurance policy is in place, (ii) where an investment grade or creditworthy party has agreed to take responsibility, and pay, for any required repair or remediation, (iii) the Mortgaged Property is a single tenant property (or substantially leased to a single tenant) and the tenant is responsible for the repairs, (iv) the amount recommended is less than $50,000, (v) a repair or replacement item that does not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property or (v) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
● | Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions – In most cases, various tenants have lease expirations within the mortgage loan term. To mitigate this risk, special reserves may be required to be funded either at closing of the mortgage loan and/or during the mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by such tenants. Barclays may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where there is institutional sponsorship or a high net worth individual, (ii) where tenant improvement costs are the responsibility of tenants, (iii) where rents at the Mortgaged Property are considered to be sufficiently below market, (iv) where no material leases expire within the mortgage loan term, or the lease roll is not concentrated, (v) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or (vi) any Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances. |
● | For certain mortgage loans, Barclays requires reserves only upon the occurrence of certain trigger events, such as debt service coverage ratios or tenant-specific tests or occurrences. |
320
● | Other Factors – Other factors that are considered in the origination of a commercial mortgage loan include current operations, occupancy and tenant base. |
Barclays may determine that establishing any of the foregoing escrows or reserves is not warranted in one or more of the following instances (collectively, the “Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances”): (i) the amounts involved are de minimis, (ii) Barclays’ evaluation of the ability of the Mortgaged Property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve, (iii) based on the Mortgaged Property maintaining a specified debt service coverage ratio, (iv) Barclays has structured springing escrows that arise for identified risks, (v) Barclays has an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower; (vi) Barclays believes there are credit positive characteristics of the borrower, the sponsor of the borrower and/or the Mortgaged Property that would offset the need for the escrow or reserve; or (vii) the reserves are being collected and held by a third party, such as a management company, a franchisor, or an association.
Servicing. Interim servicing for all loans originated or acquired by Barclays prior to securitization is typically performed by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
Exceptions. Notwithstanding the discussion under “—Barclays’ Underwriting Guidelines and Process” above, one or more of the Barclays Mortgage Loans may vary from, or do not comply with, Barclays underwriting guidelines described above. In addition, in the case of one or more of the Barclays Mortgage Loans, Barclays may not have strictly applied the underwriting guidelines described above as the result of a case by case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors. For any material exceptions to Barclays’ underwriting guidelines described above in respect of the Barclays Mortgage Loans, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” in this prospectus.
Compliance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act
Barclays has most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on November 9, 2017 in connection with it being a securitizer of certain types of mortgage loans. Barclays’ Central Index Key is 0000312070. It has no history of repurchases or repurchase requests required to be reported by Barclays under Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act, as amended, with respect to breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage loan securitizations.
Retained Interests in This Securitization
As of the Closing Date, neither Barclays Bank PLC nor any of its affiliates will retain on the Closing Date any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization. However, Barclays Bank PLC or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of such at any time.
Neither Barclays nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against Barclays for any losses or other claims in connection with the certificates or the mortgage loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by Barclays in the related MLPA as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
321
From time to time, Barclays is involved in civil legal proceedings and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its securitization business. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such matters, Barclays has denied, or believes it has meritorious defenses and will deny, liability in all significant cases pending against it in its capacity as sponsor or mortgage loan seller, and intends to defend actively each such case.
The information set forth under “—Barclays Bank PLC” has been provided by Barclays.
The Depositor
UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. is a special purpose corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware on October 12, 2011 for the purpose of engaging in the business, among other things, of acquiring and depositing mortgage loans in trust in exchange for certificates evidencing interest in such trusts and selling or otherwise distributing such certificates. The principal executive offices of the depositor are located at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10019. The depositor’s telephone number is (212) 713-2000. The depositor’s capitalization is nominal. All of the shares of capital stock of the depositor are held by UBS Americas, Inc., a subsidiary UBS AG, New York Branch.
The depositor will have minimal ongoing duties with respect to the certificates and the Mortgage Loans. These duties will include, without limitation, (i) appointing a successor trustee or custodian in the event of the resignation or removal of the trustee or custodian, as applicable, (ii) providing information in its possession with respect to the certificates to the certificate administrator to the extent necessary to perform REMIC tax administration and preparing disclosure required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), (iii) indemnifying the trustee, the custodian, the certificate administrator and the issuing entity for any liability, assessment or costs arising from the depositor’s willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in providing such information, (iv) indemnifying the trustee, the custodian and the certificate administrator against certain securities laws liabilities and (v) signing any distribution report on Form 10-D, current report on Form 8-K or annual report on Form 10-K, including the required certification therein under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, required to be filed by the issuing entity and reviewing filings pursuant to the Exchange Act prepared by the certificate administrator on behalf of the issuing entity. The depositor is also required under the Underwriting Agreement to indemnify the underwriters for, or to contribute to losses in respect of, certain securities law liabilities.
The depositor purchases commercial mortgage loans and interests in commercial mortgage loans for the purpose of selling those assets to trusts created in connection with the securitization of pools of assets and does not engage in any activities unrelated to those securitizations. On the Closing Date, the depositor will acquire the Mortgage Loans from each mortgage loan seller and will simultaneously transfer them, without recourse, to the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders. The depositor does not have, nor is it expected in the future to have, any significant assets and is not engaged in activities unrelated to the securitization of mortgage loans. The depositor will not have any business operations other than securitizing mortgage loans and related activities.
The depositor remains responsible under the PSA for providing the master servicer, special servicer, certificate administrator and trustee with certain information and other assistance requested by those parties and reasonably necessary to performing their duties under the PSA. The depositor also remains responsible for mailing notices to the Certificateholders upon the appointment of certain successor entities under the PSA.
322
The Issuing Entity
The issuing entity, UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 (the “Trust”), will be a New York common law trust, formed on the Closing Date pursuant to the PSA.
The only activities that the issuing entity may perform are those set forth in the PSA, which are generally limited to owning and administering the Mortgage Loans and any REO Property, disposing of defaulted mortgage loans and REO Property, issuing the certificates, making distributions, providing reports to Certificateholders and other activities described in this prospectus. Accordingly, the issuing entity may not issue securities other than the certificates, or invest in securities, other than investing of funds in the Collection Account and other accounts maintained under the PSA in certain short-term permitted investments. The issuing entity may not lend or borrow money, except that the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee may make Advances of delinquent monthly debt service payments and Servicing Advances to the issuing entity, but only to the extent it does not deem such Advances to be nonrecoverable from the related mortgage loan; such Advances are intended to provide liquidity, rather than credit support. The PSA may be amended as set forth under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Amendment”. The issuing entity administers the Mortgage Loans through the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer and the special servicer. A discussion of the duties of the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer and the special servicer, including any discretionary activities performed by each of them, is set forth in this prospectus under “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator” and “—The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
The only assets of the issuing entity other than the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties are the Collection Account and other accounts maintained pursuant to the PSA, the short-term investments in which funds in the Collection Account and other accounts are invested. The issuing entity has no present liabilities, but has potential liability relating to ownership of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties and certain other activities described in this prospectus, and indemnity obligations to the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer and the operating advisor. The fiscal year of the issuing entity is the calendar year. The issuing entity has no executive officers or board of directors and acts through the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer and the special servicer.
The depositor will be contributing the Mortgage Loans to the issuing entity. The depositor will be purchasing the Mortgage Loans from the mortgage loan sellers, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator
Wells Fargo Bank will act as the trustee, the certificate administrator, the custodian and the 17g-5 Information Provider under the PSA. Wells Fargo Bank is a national banking association and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company. A diversified financial services company, Wells Fargo & Company is a U.S. bank holding company with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets and approximately 268,000 employees as of September 30, 2017, which provides banking, insurance, trust, mortgage and consumer finance services throughout the United States and internationally. Wells Fargo Bank provides retail and commercial banking services and corporate trust, custody, securities lending, securities transfer, cash management, investment management and other financial and fiduciary services. The transaction parties may maintain banking and other commercial relationships with Wells Fargo Bank and its affiliates. Wells Fargo Bank maintains principal corporate
323
trust offices at 9062 Old Annapolis Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951 (among other locations) and its office for certificate transfer services is located at 600 South 4th Street, 7th Floor MAC: N9300-070, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479.
Wells Fargo Bank has provided corporate trust services since 1934. Wells Fargo Bank acts as a trustee for a variety of transactions and asset types, including corporate and municipal bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. As of September 30, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank was acting as trustee on approximately 362 series of commercial mortgage-backed securities with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $132 billion.
In its capacity as trustee on commercial mortgage securitizations, Wells Fargo Bank is generally required to make an advance if the related master servicer or special servicer fails to make a required advance. In the past three years, Wells Fargo Bank has not been required to make an advance on a commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction.
Under the terms of the PSA, Wells Fargo Bank is responsible for securities administration, which includes pool performance calculations, distribution calculations and the preparation of monthly distribution reports. As certificate administrator, Wells Fargo Bank is responsible for the preparation and filing of all REMIC and grantor trust tax returns on behalf of the issuing entity and to the extent required under the PSA, the preparation of monthly reports on Form 10-D, certain current reports on Form 8-K and annual reports on Form 10-K that are required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the issuing entity. Wells Fargo Bank has been engaged in the business of securities administration since June 30, 1995, and in connection with commercial mortgage-backed securities since 1997. As of September 30, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank was acting as securities administrator with respect to more than $415 billion of outstanding commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Wells Fargo Bank is acting as custodian of the mortgage loan files pursuant to the PSA. In that capacity, Wells Fargo Bank is responsible to hold and safeguard the mortgage notes and other contents of the mortgage files on behalf of the Trustee and the Certificateholders. Wells Fargo Bank maintains each mortgage loan file in a separate file folder marked with a unique bar code to assure loan-level file integrity and to assist in inventory management. Files are segregated by transaction or investor. Wells Fargo Bank has been engaged in the mortgage document custody business for more than 25 years. Wells Fargo Bank maintains its commercial document custody facilities in Minneapolis, Minnesota. As of September 30, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank was acting as custodian of more than 227,000 commercial mortgage loan files.
Wells Fargo Bank serves or may have served within the past two years as loan file custodian for various mortgage loans owned by the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor one or more of those mortgage loans may be included in the Trust. The terms of any custodial agreement under which those services are provided by Wells Fargo Bank are customary for the mortgage-backed securitization industry and provide for the delivery, receipt, review and safekeeping of mortgage loan files.
For three CMBS transactions in its portfolio, Wells Fargo Bank disclosed material noncompliance on its related 2016 Annual Statement of Compliance furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB to the required recipients for the transactions. For one CMBS transaction, an administrative error caused an overpayment to a certain class and a correlating underpayment to a certain class for two consecutive distributions. Each of the affected distributions was revised the next month to correct the error. For two CMBS transactions, distributions for one month were paid one day late as a result of an
324
inadvertent payment systems error that occurred in connection with a conversion to a new payment system. For one of these two CMBS transactions, distributions were one day late for the next month due to an unrelated delay in posting funds received from the servicer to the appropriate account.
On June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed a civil complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trustee under 276 residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts, which was later amended on July 18, 2014, to increase the number of trusts to 284 RMBS trusts. On November 24, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the state court action without prejudice. That same day, a group of institutional investors filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against the bank in its capacity as trustee for 274 RMBS trusts (the “Federal Court Complaint”). In December 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court action was granted. As with the prior state court action, the Federal Court Complaint is one of six similar complaints filed contemporaneously against RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and US Bank) by a group of institutional investor plaintiffs. The Federal Court Complaint against Wells Fargo Bank alleges that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserts causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought includes money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. Other cases alleging similar causes of action have been filed against Wells Fargo Bank and other trustees in the District Court by RMBS investors in these and other transactions, and these cases against Wells Fargo Bank are proceeding before the same District Court judge. A similar complaint was also filed May 27, 2016 in New York state court by a different plaintiff investor. On January 19, 2016, an order was entered in connection with the Federal Court Complaint in which the District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction over 261 trusts at issue in the Federal Court Complaint; the District Court also allowed plaintiffs to file amended complaints as to the remaining, non-dismissed trusts, if they so chose, and three amended complaints have been filed. On December 17, 2016, the investor plaintiffs in the 261 trusts dismissed from the Federal Court Complaint filed a new complaint in New York state court (the “State Court Complaint” ). In September 2017, Royal Park Investments SA/NV (“Royal Park”), one of the plaintiffs in the District Court cases against Wells Fargo Bank, filed a putative class action complaint relating to two trusts seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages based on Wells Fargo Bank’s indemnification from trust funds for legal fees and expenses Wells Fargo Bank incurs or has incurred in defending the District Court case filed by Royal Park. With respect to the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts.
As of the Closing Date, neither Wells Fargo Bank nor any of its affiliates will retain any economic interest in this securitization, including without limitation any certificates issued by the issuing entity. However, Wells Fargo Bank or its affiliates may, from time to time after the initial sale of the certificates to investors on the Closing Date, acquire certificates pursuant to secondary market transactions. Any such party will have the right to dispose of any such certificates at any time.
325
The foregoing information regarding Wells Fargo Bank set forth under this heading “—The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator” has been provided by Wells Fargo Bank.
For a description of any material affiliations, relationships and related transactions between the certificate administrator and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
The trustee and the certificate administrator will only be liable under the PSA to the extent of the obligations specifically imposed by the PSA. For further information regarding the duties, responsibilities, rights and obligations of the trustee under the PSA, including those related to indemnification, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”. Certain terms of the PSA regarding the trustee’s removal, replacement or resignation are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator”.
The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, a national banking association (“Midland”), is expected to be the master servicer and in this capacity will initially be responsible for the master servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans and any Serviced Companion Loans pursuant to the PSA. Certain servicing and administrative functions may also be provided by one or more primary servicers that previously serviced the mortgage loans for the mortgage loan seller. Midland is also expected to be appointed to act as an initial special servicer under the PSA and in this capacity is expected to be responsible for the servicing and administration of the applicable Specially Serviced Loans and any associated REO Properties, and generally, will review, evaluate and provide or withhold consent as to certain Major Decisions and all Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions. Generally, Midland will process Major Decisions and Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions, and will perform certain enforcement actions relating to the Mortgage Loans (other than any Excluded Special Servicer Loan or Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and Serviced Companion Loans that are non-Specially Serviced Loans, pursuant to the PSA. Midland’s principal servicing office is located at 10851 Mastin Street, Building 82, Suite 300, Overland Park, Kansas 66210.
Midland is a real estate financial services company that provides loan servicing, asset management and technology solutions for large pools of commercial and multifamily real estate assets. Midland is approved as a master servicer, special servicer and primary servicer for investment-grade commercial and multifamily mortgage-backed securities (“CMMBS”) by S&P Global Ratings, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings, Inc., Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC, DBRS, Inc. and Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc. Midland has received the highest rankings as a master and primary servicer of real estate assets under U.S. CMMBS transactions from S&P Global Ratings, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business, Fitch Ratings, Inc. and Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC and the highest rankings as a special servicer of real estate assets under U.S. CMMBS transactions from S&P Global Ratings, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business and Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC. For each category, S&P Global Ratings, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business ranks Midland as “Strong” and Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC ranks Midland as “CS1”. Fitch Ratings, Inc. rates Midland as “CMS1” for master servicer, “CPS1” for primary servicer, and “CSS2+” for special servicer. Midland is also a HUD/FHA-approved mortgagee and a Fannie Mae approved multifamily loan servicer.
Midland has detailed operating procedures across the various servicing functions to maintain compliance with its servicing obligations and the servicing standards under
326
Midland’s servicing agreements, including procedures for managing delinquent and specially serviced loans. The policies and procedures are reviewed annually and centrally managed. Furthermore, Midland’s disaster recovery plan is reviewed annually.
Midland will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the underlying Mortgage Loans or the Serviced Companion Loans. Midland may from time to time have custody of certain of such documents as necessary for enforcement actions involving particular Mortgage Loans or the Serviced Companion Loans or otherwise. To the extent that Midland has custody of any such documents for any such servicing purposes, such documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard.
No securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which Midland was acting as master servicer, primary servicer or special servicer has experienced a servicer event of default or servicer termination event as a result of any action or inaction of Midland as master servicer, primary servicer or special servicer, as applicable, including as a result of Midland’s failure to comply with the applicable servicing criteria in connection with any securitization transaction. Midland has made all advances required to be made by it under the servicing agreements on the commercial and multifamily mortgage loans serviced by Midland in securitization transactions.
From time to time Midland is a party to lawsuits and other legal proceedings as part of its duties as a loan servicer (e.g., enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course of business. Midland does not believe that any such lawsuits or legal proceedings would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business or its ability to service loans pursuant to the PSA.
Midland currently maintains an Internet-based investor reporting system, CMBS Investor Insight®, that contains performance information at the portfolio, loan and property levels on the various commercial mortgage backed securities transactions that it services. Certificateholders, prospective transferees of the certificates and other appropriate parties may obtain access to CMBS Investor Insight® through Midland’s website at www.pnc.com/midland. Midland may require registration and execution of an access agreement in connection with providing access to CMBS Investor Insight®.
As of December 31, 2017, Midland was master and/or primary servicing approximately 31,321 commercial and multifamily mortgage loans with a principal balance of approximately $440 billion. The collateral for such loans is located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam and Canada. Approximately 8,888 of such loans, with a total principal balance of approximately $162 billion, pertain to commercial and multifamily mortgage-backed securities. The related loan pools include multifamily, office, retail, hospitality and other income producing properties.
Midland has been servicing commercial and multifamily loans and leases in CMMBS and other servicing transactions since 1992. The table below contains information on the size of the portfolio of commercial and multifamily loans and leases in CMMBS and other servicing transactions for which Midland has acted as master and/or primary servicer from 2015 to 2017.
327
Portfolio Size – Master/Primary |
Calendar
Year End | ||
2015 |
2016 |
2017 | |
CMBS | $149 | $149 | $162 |
Other | $255 |
$294 |
$323 |
Total | $404 |
$444 |
$486 |
As of December 31, 2017, Midland was named the special servicer in approximately 296 commercial mortgage backed securities transactions with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $145 billion. With respect to such transactions as of such date, Midland was administering approximately 92 assets with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $727 million.
Midland has acted as a special servicer for commercial and multifamily loans and leases in CMMBS and other servicing transactions since 1992. The table below contains information on the size of the portfolio of specially serviced commercial and multifamily loans, leases and REO properties that have been referred to Midland as special servicer in CMMBS and other servicing transactions from 2015 to 2017.
Portfolio Size – Special Servicing |
Calendar
Year End | ||
2015 |
2016 |
2017 | |
Total | $110 | $121 | $145 |
PNC Bank, National Association and its affiliates may use some of the same service providers (e.g., legal counsel, accountants and appraisal firms) as are retained on behalf of the issuing entity. In some cases, fee rates, amounts or discounts may be offered to PNC Bank, National Association and its affiliates by a third party vendor which differ from those offered to the issuing entity as a result of scheduled or ad hoc rate changes, differences in the scope, type or nature of the service or transaction, alternative fee arrangements, and negotiation by PNC Bank, National Association or its affiliates other than the Midland division.
From time to time, Midland and/or its affiliates may purchase or sell securities, including certificates issued in this offering in the secondary market.
Midland may enter into one or more arrangements with the Directing Certificateholder, a Controlling Class Certificateholder, any directing holder, any Companion Loan Holder, the other Certificateholders (or an affiliate or a third-party representative of one or more of the preceding) or any other person with the right to appoint or remove and replace the special servicer to provide for a discount, waiver and/or revenue sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation in consideration of, among other things, Midland’s appointment (or continuance) as special servicer under the PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement and limitations on the right of such person to replace the special servicer. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment”.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between UBS AG, New York Branch or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity.
Midland will acquire the right to act as master servicer and/or primary servicer (and the related right to receive and retain the excess servicing strip) with respect to the Mortgage
328
Loans sold to the issuing entity by the sponsor pursuant to one or more servicing rights appointment agreements entered into on the Closing Date. The “excess servicing strip” means a portion of the Servicing Fee payable to Midland that accrues at a per annum rate initially equal to the Servicing Fee Rate minus 0.00125%, but which may be reduced under certain circumstances as provided in the PSA.
KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P. or one of its affiliates is expected to serve as the initial Directing Certificateholder, and has engaged Midland as an independent contractor to conduct due diligence with respect to certain Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to a certain servicing arrangement between Berkeley Point Capital LLC or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland on the other hand, Midland acts as an interim servicer with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the underlying Mortgage Loans originated by CCRE Lending or one of its affiliates.
Pursuant to a primary servicing agreement between Berkeley Point Capital LLC, an affiliate of CCRE Lending, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Berkeley Point Capital LLC is expected to have full cashiering subservicing duties with respect to three (3) of the CCRE Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 7.2% of the Initial Pool Balance. In addition, pursuant to a limited subservicing agreement between Berkeley Point Capital LLC and Midland, Berkeley Point Capital LLC is expected to have certain limited subservicing duties consisting of performing inspections and collecting financial statements with respect to three (3) CCRE Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 3.0% of the Initial Pool Balance.
The foregoing information regarding Midland under this section titled “—The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer” has been provided by Midland. None of the depositor, the underwriters, the master servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the trustee, the certificate administrator or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for this information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.
For a description of any material affiliations, relationships and related transactions between Midland, in its capacity as master servicer and special servicer, and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
Midland will have various duties under the PSA. Certain duties and obligations of Midland are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—General” and “—Enforcement of “Due-on-Sale” and “Due-on-Encumbrance” Provisions”. The ability of a master servicer to waive or modify any terms, fees, penalties or payments on the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), and the effect of that ability on the potential cash flows from such Mortgage Loans, are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”. The master servicer’s obligations as the servicer to make advances, and the interest or other fees charged for those advances and the terms of the master servicer’s recovery of those advances, are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”.
Midland, in its capacity as master servicer and special servicer, will only be liable under the PSA to the extent of the obligations specifically imposed by the PSA. Certain terms of the PSA regarding the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s removal, replacement or resignation are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”, “—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause—
329
Servicer Termination Events”, “—Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event” and “—Waiver of Servicer Termination Event”. The master servicer’s and the special servicer’s rights and obligations with respect to indemnification, and certain limitations on the master servicer’s and the special servicer’s liability under the PSA, are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”.
The Primary Servicer
Berkeley Point Capital LLC
Berkeley Point Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“BPC”) will be appointed as primary servicer for the CCRE Mortgage Loans identified on Annex A-1 as CrossPoint, 4851 South Alameda Street and Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony, collectively representing approximately 7.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, and in such capacity, will be responsible for the primary servicing and administration of this mortgage loan. In addition, with respect to three (3) Mortgage Loans secured by Mortgaged Properties, collectively representing approximately 3.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, BPC will have the right to assume limited subservicing duties consisting of performing inspections and collecting financial statements. BPC is an affiliate under common control with CCRE Lending, an originator and mortgage loan seller, and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., an underwriter. BPC is a wholly owned subsidiary of BGC Partners, Inc., a publicly traded company which is controlled by Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. CCRE Lending and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. are subsidiaries of Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P.
The principal executive offices of BPC are located at 7700 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1100, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 and principal servicing office of BPC is located at One Beacon Street, 14th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 and its telephone number is (877) 526-3562.
BPC serves as primary servicer in various transactions and is rated as a primary servicer and special servicer. Current ratings are listed below.
Servicer Rating Type |
Fitch |
S&P |
KBRA |
Primary Servicer | CPS2 | Above Average | Approved |
Special Servicer | CSS3+ | Average | Approved-multifamily |
Together with its predecessor entities, BPC has originated and serviced commercial real estate loans for over 25 years. Directly or through its affiliates, BPC originates and acts as primary servicer for commercial and multifamily loans for properties across the United States through programs offered by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae/FHA, Life Companies, and CMBS. BPC is a Fannie Mae DUS™, Freddie Mac Program Plus® and MAP-and LEAN-approved FHA lender and servicer, and a Ginnie Mae Issuer. It has been named special servicer on eight Freddie Mac K-Series securitizations, the first in 2009, one in 2013, and two in 2015 and four Freddie Mac SB-Series securitization in 2017. In addition to its primary and special servicing assignments, BPC also provides limited servicing on CMBS loans originated directly or through an affiliate. The firm has offices located in Bethesda, Maryland, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, Boston, Massachusetts, Dallas, Texas, Irvine, California, New York, New York, Raleigh, North Carolina, San Diego, California, Santa Monica, California, Seattle, Washington, and Tampa, Florida.
330
As of December 31, 2017, BPC’s primary servicing portfolio was comprised of approximately 2117 loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $38.27 billion, of which BPC is the primary servicer through sub-servicing agreements with master servicers on 137 Freddie Mac K-Series securitizations for 495 loans with an approximate aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $11.87 billion, and 102 commercial mortgage loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $2.61 billion in other CMBS securitizations.
The following table sets forth information about the various pools of loans primarily serviced by BPC as of the dates indicated:
CMBS Pools |
As of 12/31/2015 |
As of 12/31/2016 |
As of 12/31/2017 | |
Primary Serviced Portfolio By Approximate Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance | $7.82 billion | $11.21 billion | $14.48 billion | |
By Number | 99
pools (313 loans) |
133
pools (444 loans) |
176 pools (597 loans) | |
Limited Subservicing Portfolio By Approximate Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance | $14.05 billion | $15.83 billion | $15.67 billion | |
By Number | 49
pools (830 loans) |
58
pools (928 loans) |
63 pools (957 loans) |
The commercial real estate loans that BPC originates and for which BPC provides servicing may include mortgage loans secured by the same types of income producing properties as those securing the underlying mortgage loans backing the series UBS 2018-C8 certificates. Accordingly, the assets that BPC services as well as assets originated and/or owned by it or its affiliates may, depending upon the particular circumstances, including the nature and location of such assets, compete with the mortgaged real properties securing the underlying mortgage loans for tenants, purchasers, financing and so forth.
BPC has developed policies and procedures for the performance of its servicing obligations in compliance with applicable USAP and Reg AB servicing standards. BPC uses the Enterprise! Servicing system and generally utilizes technology infrastructure to bolster and facilitate controls for compliance with pooling and servicing agreements, loan administration and procedures in workout/resolution and commercially appropriate standardization and automation to provide for improved accuracy, efficiency, transparency, monitoring and controls. Through its web portal, Portfolio Investor Insight®, BPC provides its investors access to data and reports for the loans that it services. Borrowers may also access monthly statements as well as current and historical loan information through a password protected website, Borrower Insight®.
BPC may from time to time engage consultants to perform property inspections and to provide asset management on certain properties. BPC does not have any material primary advancing obligations with respect to the CMBS pools as to which it is a primary servicer, and accordingly BPC does not believe that its financial condition will have any adverse effect on the performance of its duties under the series UBS 2018-C8 pooling and servicing agreement nor any material impact on the mortgage pool performance or the performance of the series UBS 2018-C8 certificates.
331
BPC will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the underlying mortgage loans. On occasion, BPC may have custody of certain of such documents as necessary for the performance of its duties with respect to underlying Mortgage Loans or otherwise. To the extent that BPC has custody of any such documents, such documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard.
BPC is not an affiliate of any of the sponsors, the issuing entity, the depositor, the master servicer, the trustee or any originator other than CCRE Lending and is not an affiliate of any underwriter other than Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. Other than its relationship with CCRE Lending and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (and indirectly any relationships of those two entities disclosed elsewhere in this prospectus), there are no specific relationships involving or relating to this transaction or the securitized mortgage loans between BPC or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the depositor, the sponsors or the issuing entity, on the other hand, that currently exist or that existed during the past two (2) years. In addition, there are no business relationships, agreements, arrangements, transactions or understandings that have been entered into outside the ordinary course of business or on terms other than would be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with an unrelated third party -- apart from the subject securitization transaction -- between BPC or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the depositor, the sponsors or the issuing entity, on the other hand, that currently exist or that existed during the past two (2) years and that are material to an investor’s understanding of the series UBS 2018-C8 certificates.
No securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which BPC is acting as primary or special servicer has experienced an event of default as a result of any action or inaction performed by BPC in such capacity. In addition, there has been no previous disclosure of material non-compliance with servicing criteria by BPC with respect to any other securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which BPC was acting as primary servicer or special servicer.
From time to time, BPC and its affiliates are parties to lawsuits and other legal proceedings by governmental authorities or other entities arising in the ordinary course of business. BPC does not believe that any such current lawsuits or legal proceedings would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business or its ability to serve as servicer or be material to a series UBS 2018-C8 certificateholder.
Neither BPC nor any of its affiliates intends to retain any certificates issued by the issuing entity or any other economic interest in this securitization.
The information set forth above under this heading “—Berkeley Point Capital LLC” has been provided by Berkeley Point and neither the depositor nor any underwriter takes any responsibility for such information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.
Summary of BPC Primary Servicing Agreement
General. BPC has acquired the right to be appointed as the primary servicer of the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 Tryad Industrial & Business Center, South Bend Medical Office and Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony (the “BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans”). Accordingly, Midland, as master servicer, and BPC, as primary servicer, will enter into a primary servicing agreement, dated as of February 1, 2018 (the “BPC Primary Servicing Agreement”). The primary servicing of the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans will be governed by the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement. The following summary describes certain provisions of the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement relating to the primary servicing and administration of the BPC Primary
332
Serviced Mortgage Loans. The summary does not purport to be complete and is subject, and qualified in its entirety, by reference to the provisions of the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement.
Summary of Duties. With respect to the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans, BPC, as primary servicer, will be responsible for performing the primary servicing of the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans in a manner consistent with the PSA and the Servicing Standard. Primary servicing will include:
● | maintaining the servicing file and releasing files upon borrower request or payoff of such mortgage loan as approved by the master servicer; |
● | (i) within 5 business days of receipt of a repurchase demand, reporting any such repurchase demand to the master servicer and forwarding a copy of such repurchase demand to the master servicer, (ii) within 5 business days of discovery or notice of a document defect or breach, notifying the master servicer in writing of any discovered document defect or breach of a mortgage loan representation, (iii) promptly providing the master servicer with any documentation in BPC’s possession reasonably requested by the master servicer and (iv) cooperating with the master servicer in pursuing its obligations to make a repurchase claim against the related mortgage loan seller; |
● | collecting monthly payments and escrow and reserve payments and maintaining a segregated primary servicer collection account and applicable escrow and reserve accounts to hold such collections; |
● | remitting to the master servicer on a timely basis monthly payments less any primary servicing fees, escrow and reserve payments and payments in the nature of additional servicing compensation due to BPC, as primary servicer; |
● | preparing such reports, including a day one report, monthly remittance report and such other reports as reasonably requested by the master servicer from time to time; |
● | collecting monthly and quarterly borrower reports, rent rolls and operating statements; |
● | performing annual inspections of the related mortgaged property and providing inspection reports to the master servicer; |
● | monitoring borrower insurance obligations on such loans and related specially serviced loans and obtaining such property level insurance when the borrower fails to maintain such insurance; |
● | maintaining errors and omissions insurance and an appropriate fidelity bond; |
● | notifying the master servicer of any borrower requests or transactions; provided, however, that BPC will not approve or consummate any borrower request or transaction without obtaining the prior written consent of the master servicer; |
● | promptly notifying master servicer of any defaults under a BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loan, collection issues or customer issues; provided that BPC will not take any action with respect to enforcing such loans without the prior written approval of the master servicer; |
333
● | in connection with any request for materials by the asset representations reviewer with respect to this PSA or any other asset representations reviewer, promptly providing master servicer with any documents requested by the master servicer and cooperating with the master servicer in connection with its obligations relating to such request; and |
● | with respect to all servicing responsibilities of the master servicer under the PSA which are not being performed by BPC under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement, BPC will reasonably cooperate with the master servicer to facilitate the timely performance of such servicing responsibilities. |
BPC’s custodial responsibilities are limited to original letters of credit as long as it (i) has a vault or other adequate safety procedures in place satisfactory to the master servicer, in its sole discretion, or (ii) outsources such responsibility to a third party vendor satisfactory to the master servicer, who has a vault or other adequate safety procedures in place satisfactory to the master servicer, in its sole discretion.
BPC will provide to master servicer access to all the servicing files, mortgage loan files and servicing systems maintained by BPC with respect to the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans for audit and review. BPC will not take any action (whether or not authorized under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement) that would result in the imposition of a tax on any portion of the issuing entity or cause either the Lower-Tier REMIC or the Upper-Tier REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or cause the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust. BPC will fully cooperate with the master servicer in connection with avoiding the imposition of a tax on any portion of the issuing entity or cause either the Lower-Tier REMIC or the Upper-Tier REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or cause the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust.
BPC will also timely provide such certifications, reports and registered public accountant attestations required by the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or by the master servicer to permit it to comply with the PSA and the depositor to comply with its Exchange Act reporting obligations.
The master servicer and BPC will each designate a portfolio manager and other appropriate personnel to receive documents and communications between each other such that BPC is able to perform its obligations under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement and the master servicer is able to perform its supervisory authority over BPC. BPC will not communicate directly with the special servicer, the Directing Certificateholder or any Rating Agency except in very limited circumstances set forth in the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement.
BPC will have no obligation to make any principal and interest advance or any servicing advances. BPC will not make any Major Decisions, Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions or take any other action requiring the approval of the master servicer under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement without the prior written approval of the master servicer.
Such consent may be subject to: (a) the prior approval of the special servicer, the Directing Certificateholder or any mezzanine loan lender, as applicable, if so required under the PSA or the related Mortgage Loan documents, which approval may be withheld in such person’s sole discretion, and (b) obtaining any Rating Agency Confirmation required under the PSA or the related Mortgage Loan documents, which confirmation may be withheld in such person’s sole discretion. The master servicer will request any such approvals or Rating Agency Confirmation.
334
Compensation. As compensation for its activities under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement, the primary servicing fee will be paid only to the extent that the master servicer receives the Servicing Fee with respect to the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans under the PSA. BPC is not entitled to any Prepayment Interest Excess. BPC will be entitled to such additional servicing compensation as set forth in the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement. Generally, if received and the master servicer is entitled to retain such amounts under the PSA, BPC will also be entitled to retain, with respect to the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans, as additional primary servicing compensation (the “Additional Primary Servicing Compensation”), the following:
● | 100% of the master servicer’s share of late payment charges, demand charges and default interest to the extent BPC is performing the related collection work and to the extent not required to offset (a) interest on Advances or (b) certain additional trust fund expenses incurred with respect to the related BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loan; |
● | 100% of the master servicer’s share of any charges for beneficiary statements to the extent such beneficiary statements were prepared by BPC and amounts collected for checks returned for insufficient funds relating to the accounts held by BPC; |
● | 50% of the master servicer’s share of any Excess Modification Fees, assumption application fees, assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, review fees and similar fees; and |
● | subject to certain limitations set forth in the PSA, any interest or other income earned on deposits in the related accounts held by BPC. |
BPC will not be entitled to any Additional Primary Servicing Compensation in the form of fees earned with respect to the processing of any Special Servicer Non-Major Decision performed by the special servicer; provided, however, that if the master servicer and BPC mutually agree that BPC will process any Special Servicer Non-Major Decision following approval of such decision by the special servicer and BPC processes such Special Servicer Non-Major Decision, BPC will be entitled to the applicable fee as described above.
BPC will be required to promptly remit to the master servicer any additional servicing compensation or other amounts received by it which BPC is not entitled to retain. Except as otherwise provided, BPC will pay all its overhead and similar expenses incurred by it in connection with its servicing activities under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement.
Indemnification; Limitation of Liability. Neither BPC nor any partners, directors, officers, shareholders, members, managers, employees or agents of BPC (the “BPC Parties”) will be under any liability to the master servicer for any action taken, or for refraining from the taking of any action, in good faith pursuant to the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement, or for errors in judgment. However, this will not protect the BPC Parties against any liability which would be imposed by reason of any breach of warranties or representations made in the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement, or against any liability that would otherwise be imposed on BPC by reason of its willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence (or by reason of any specific liability imposed under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement for a breach of the accepted primary servicing practices) in the performance of its obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or by reason of its negligent disregard of its obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement. The BPC Parties will be indemnified and held harmless by the master servicer against any and all claims, losses, penalties, fines, forfeitures, reasonable legal fees and related costs, judgments, and any
335
other costs, liabilities, fees and expenses incurred in connection with any actual or threatened legal or administrative action (whether in equity or at law) or claim relating to the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement (collectively, the “Losses”) incurred by BPC (1) by reason of the master servicer’s willful misconduct, bad faith, negligence in the performance of its obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or negligent disregard of its obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or (2) in connection with, or relating to, the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement, the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Certificates, other than any Losses incurred by BPC (i) that are specifically required to be borne by BPC without right of reimbursement pursuant to the terms of the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or (ii) incurred by reason of (A) a breach of any representation or warranty by BPC or (B) willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence of BPC in the performance of its respective obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or negligent disregard of its respective obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement; provided, however, that the indemnification under clause (2) above will be strictly limited to any actual amount of indemnification received by the master servicer under the PSA as a result of pursuing the issuing entity on behalf of BPC for such indemnification.
BPC will indemnify and hold harmless the master servicer and its partners, directors, officers, shareholders, members, managers, employees or agents against any Losses incurred by the master servicer by reason of (1) any breach by BPC of a representation or warranty made by BPC in the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or (2) any willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence by BPC in the performance of its respective obligations and duties under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or under the PSA or by reason of negligent disregard of such obligations and duties.
Resignation. The BPC Primary Servicing Agreement will generally provide that BPC may not resign from the obligations and duties imposed on it under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement unless BPC provides to the master servicer sixty (60) days prior written notice of such resignation or such lesser notice as may be acceptable to the master servicer to enable the master servicer to assume all of BPC’s rights, powers, duties and obligations under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement.
Termination. The BPC Primary Servicing Agreement will be terminated with respect to BPC if any of the following occurs:
● | the master servicer elects to terminate BPC following a BPC Primary Servicer Termination Event (as defined below); |
● | at the depositor’s request (to the extent the depositor has the right to request termination of BPC under the PSA) pursuant to the final two bullets listed under BPC Primary Servicer Termination Events below; |
● | promptly following BPC being or becoming Risk Retention Affiliated (as defined under the Credit Risk Retention Rules) with or a Risk Retention Affiliate (as defined under the Credit Risk Retention Rules) of any Third Party Purchaser; |
● | upon resignation by BPC; |
● | in the event the related BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loan becomes a specially serviced loan or is substituted, defeased, purchased or repurchased pursuant to the PSA; or |
336
● | if the master servicer’s responsibilities and duties as master servicer under the PSA have been assumed by the trustee, or a successor master servicer, then the trustee or such successor master servicer will, without act or deed on the part of the trustee or such successor master servicer, as applicable, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the master servicer under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement. |
“BPC Primary Servicer Termination Event”, means any one of the following events:
● | any failure by BPC to remit to the accounts maintained by BPC or to the master servicer, any amount required to be so remitted by BPC; |
● | any failure on the part of BPC duly to observe or perform in any material respect any of the other covenants or obligations which continues unremedied for a period of 20 days (or (i) with respect to any year that a report on Form 10-K is required to be filed, 3 business days in the case of BPC’s obligations under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement in respect of Exchange Act reporting items (after any applicable grace periods) or (ii) 10 days in the case of a failure to pay the premium for any insurance policy required to be maintained under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or such shorter period (not less than 1 business day) as may be required to avoid the lapse of insurance) after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, will have been given to BPC by the master servicer, provided, however, that if such failure with a 20 day cure period is capable of being cured and BPC is diligently pursuing such cure, such 20 day period will be extended for an additional 20 days; provided that BPC has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 20 day period and has certified that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, a full cure; provided, further, however, that such extended period will not apply to the obligations regarding Exchange Act reporting; |
● | any breach on the part of BPC of any representation or warranty made pursuant to the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement which materially and adversely affects the interests of any class of Certificateholders and which continues unremedied for a period of 20 days after the date on which notice of such breach, requiring the same to be remedied, will have been given to BPC by the master servicer, provided, however, that if such breach is capable of being cured and BPC is diligently pursuing such cure, such 20 day period will be extended for an additional 20 days; provided that BPC has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 20 day period and has certified that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, a full cure; |
● | a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law for the appointment of a conservator or receiver, liquidator, trustee or similar official in any bankruptcy, insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshalling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding up or liquidation of its affairs, will have been entered against BPC and such decree or order will have remained in force, undischarged, undismissed or unstayed for a period of 45 days; |
● | BPC consents to the appointment of a conservator, receiver, liquidator, trustee or similar official in any bankruptcy, insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshalling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings of or relating to BPC, or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; |
337
● | BPC admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations or takes any corporate action in furtherance of the foregoing; |
● | any of the Rating Agencies has (A) qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more classes of certificates or (B) placed one or more classes of certificates on “watch status” in contemplation of rating downgrade or withdrawal (and in the case of clauses (A) or (B), such action has not been withdrawn by such Rating Agency within 60 days of such rating action) and, in the case of either of clauses (A) or (B), such Rating Agency publicly cited servicing concerns with the master servicer (because of actions of BPC) or BPC as the sole or a material factor in such rating action; |
● | a Servicer Termination Event by the master servicer under the PSA, which Servicer Termination Event occurred as a result of the failure of BPC to perform any obligation required under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement; |
● | the failure of BPC to comply with any of the requirements to deliver any reports or certificates at the time such report or certification is required under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement, which continues unremedied for 5 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, will have been given to BPC by the master servicer; |
● | BPC (or any subservicer of BPC appointed pursuant to BPC Primary Servicing Agreement), fails to deliver by the due date any Exchange Act reporting items required to be delivered to the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the depositor under Article XI of the PSA or under the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement or to the applicable master servicer under any other pooling and servicing agreement that the depositor is a party to; or |
● | BPC (or any subservicer of BPC appointed pursuant to BPC Primary Servicing Agreement), fails to perform in any material respect any of its covenants or obligations contained in the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement regarding creating, obtaining or delivering any Exchange Act reporting items required for any party to the PSA to perform its obligations under Article XI of the PSA or under the Exchange Act reporting items required under any other pooling and servicing agreement that the depositor is a party to. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any termination of BPC, BPC will be entitled to receive all accrued and unpaid primary servicing fees through the date of termination and will cooperate fully with the master servicer to transition primary servicing of the BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans to the master servicer or its designee.
The foregoing information regarding the BPC Primary Servicing Agreement set forth in this “—Summary of BPC Primary Servicing Agreement” section has been provided by Midland.
The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (“Park Bridge Lender Services”), a New York limited liability company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Park Bridge Financial LLC (“Park Bridge Financial”), will act as operating advisor and asset representations reviewer
338
under the PSA with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loans). Park Bridge Lender Services has an address at 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor, New York, New York 10016 and its telephone number is (212) 230-9090.
Park Bridge Financial is a privately held commercial real estate finance advisory firm headquartered in New York, New York. Since its founding in 2009, Park Bridge Financial and its affiliates have been engaged by commercial banks (community, regional and multi-national), opportunity funds, REITs, investment banks, insurance companies, entrepreneurs and hedge funds on a wide variety of advisory assignments. These engagements have included: mortgage brokerage, loan syndication, contract underwriting, valuations, risk assessments, surveillance, litigation support, expert testimony, loan restructures as well as the disposition of commercial mortgages and related collateral.
Park Bridge Financial’s technology platform is server-based with back-up, disaster recovery and encryption services performed by vendors and data centers that comply with industry and regulatory standards.
Park Bridge Lender Services satisfies each of the criteria of the definition of “Eligible Operating Advisor” set forth in “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor—Eligibility of Operating Advisor”. Park Bridge Lender Services: (a) is an operating advisor on other commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions rated by any of the Rating Agencies and none of those rating agencies has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn any of its ratings of one or more classes of certificates for any such transaction citing concerns with Park Bridge Lender Services as the sole or a material factor in such rating action; (b) can and will make the representations and warranties of the operating advisor set forth in the PSA; (c) is not (and is not, as defined under the Credit Risk Retention Rules, “Affiliated” with) the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, any mortgage loan seller, any Borrower Party, the Directing Certificateholder, any “significant obligor” or a depositor, trustee, certificate administrator, master servicer or special servicer with respect to the securitization of any Companion Loan or any of their respective affiliates; (d) has not been paid by the special servicer or any successor special servicer any fees, compensation or other remuneration (x) in respect of its obligations under the PSA or (y) for the recommendation of the replacement of the special servicer or the appointment of a successor special servicer to become the special servicer; (e) (x) has been regularly engaged in the business of analyzing and advising clients in commercial mortgage-backed securities matters and has at least five years of experience in collateral analysis and loss projections, and (y) has at least five years of experience in commercial real estate asset management and experience in the workout and management of distressed commercial real estate assets; and (f) does not directly or indirectly, through one or more affiliates or otherwise, own or have derivative exposure in any interest in any certificates, any Mortgage Loans or otherwise have any financial interest in the securitization transaction to which the PSA relates, any Companion Loan or securities backed by a Companion Loan other than its fees from its role as operating advisor and asset representations reviewer.
As of December 31, 2017, Park Bridge Lender Services was acting as operating advisor or trust advisor for commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions with an approximate aggregate initial principal balance of $146.2 billion issued in 161 transactions.
As of December 31, 2017, Park Bridge Lender Services was acting as asset representations reviewer for commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions with an approximate aggregate initial principal balance of $56.5 billion issued in 65 transactions.
339
There are no legal proceedings pending against Park Bridge Lender Services, or to which any property of Park Bridge Lender Services is subject, that are material to the Certificateholders, nor does Park Bridge Lender Services have actual knowledge of any proceedings of this type contemplated by governmental authorities.
The foregoing information under this heading “—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” has been provided by Park Bridge Lender Services.
For a description of any material affiliations, relationships and related transactions between the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer and the other transaction parties, see “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
The operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer will only be liable under the PSA to the extent of the obligations specifically imposed by the PSA, and no implied duties or obligations may be asserted against the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer. For further information regarding the duties, responsibilities, rights and obligations of the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer, as the case may be, under the PSA, including those related to indemnification, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”, “—The Asset Representations Reviewer” and “—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”. Certain terms of the PSA regarding the operating advisor’s or asset representations reviewer’s, as the case may be, removal, replacement, resignation or transfer are described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor” and “—The Asset Representations Reviewer”.
Credit Risk Retention
General
This transaction is required to comply with the credit risk retention regulations promulgated pursuant to Section 15G of the Exchange Act, as such regulations relate to commercial mortgage-backed securities (the “Credit Risk Retention Rules”). UBS AG, New York Branch has been designated by the sponsors to act as the risk-retaining sponsor (in such capacity, the “Retaining Sponsor”) under the Credit Risk Retention Rules and UBS AG, New York Branch will elect to satisfy its risk retention requirements through the purchase by a “third-party purchaser” of an “eligible horizontal residual interest” (each as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules). It is expected that KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Third Party Purchaser”), will act as the “third-party purchaser” by causing its “majority owned affiliate” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, to purchase the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates set forth in the table below under “—Material Terms of the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates”, and will agree to hedging, transfer, financing and other restrictions applicable to a “third-party purchaser” (and its affiliates) under the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
Notwithstanding any references in this prospectus to the Credit Risk Retention Rules, the Retaining Sponsor, the Third Party Purchaser and other risk retention related matters, in the event the Credit Risk Retention Rules (or any relevant portion thereof) are repealed or determined by applicable regulatory agencies to be no longer applicable to this securitization transaction, none of the Retaining Sponsor, the Third Party Purchaser or any other party will be required to comply
340
with or act in accordance with the Credit Risk Retention Rules (or such relevant portion thereof).
Qualifying CRE Loans; Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage
The Retaining Sponsor has determined that for purposes of this transaction 0.0% of the Initial Pool Balance (the “Qualifying CRE Loan Percentage”) is comprised of Mortgage Loans that are “qualifying CRE loans” as such term is described in the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
The total required credit risk retention percentage (the “Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage”) for this transaction is 5.0%. The Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage is equal to the product of (i) 1 minus the Qualifying CRE Loan Percentage (expressed as a decimal) and (ii) 5.0%; subject to a minimum Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage of no less than 2.50% if the issuing entity includes any non-qualifying CRE loans.
Material Terms of the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates
The Third Party Purchaser will cause KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P. to purchase the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates (the “Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates”) identified in the table below that collectively comprise the eligible horizontal residual interest for cash on the Closing Date.
Eligible Horizontal Residual Interest
Class of Certificates |
Initial
Certificate |
Values
of Retained Certificates |
Purchase Price(2) | |
Class D-RR | $ | 31,272,000 | 1.46%/$15,542,703 | 49.70166% |
Class E-RR | $ | 20,903,000 | 0.98%/$10,389,138 | 49.70166% |
Class F-RR | $ | 14,371,000 | 0.67%/$7,142,626 | 49.70166% |
Class NR-RR | $ | 40,500,891 | 1.89%/$20,129,615 | 49.70166% |
(1) | The fair value of the applicable Certificate Balance of the indicated class of certificates expressed as a percentage of the fair value of all of Classes of Regular Certificates issued by the issuing entity and as a dollar amount. |
(2) | Expressed as a percentage of the initial Certificate Balance of each class of Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates, excluding accrued interest. The aggregate purchase price expected to be paid for the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates to be acquired by the Third Party Purchaser is approximately $53,204,082 excluding accrued interest. |
The aggregate fair value of the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates in the above table is equal to approximately $53,204,082 (excluding accrued interest) representing approximately 5.00% of the fair value of all of the Classes of Regular Certificates issued by the issuing entity.
The Retaining Sponsor is required to retain an eligible horizontal residual interest with a fair value as of the Closing Date of at least $53,171,919 (representing 5.00% of the aggregate fair value of all the Classes of Regular Certificates), excluding accrued interest.
The approximate fair value of each Class of Regular Certificates based on actual sales
341
prices and final tranche sizes is set forth below:
Class of Certificates |
Fair Value |
Class A-1 | $23,230,463 |
Class A-2 | $70,321,569 |
Class A-SB | $36,528,042 |
Class A-3 | $286,831,906 |
Class A-4 | $330,242,706 |
Class X-A | $50,042,383 |
Class X-B | $4,754,782 |
Class A-S | $87,464,509 |
Class B | $56,514,666 |
Class C | $44,970,195 |
Class D | $19,333,071 |
Class D-RR | $15,542,703 |
Class E-RR | $10,389,138 |
Class F-RR | $7,142,626 |
Class NR-RR | $20,129,615 |
The aggregate fair value of all of the Classes of Regular Certificates is approximately $1,063,438,376, excluding accrued interest.
As of the date of this prospectus, there are no material differences between (a) the valuation methodology or any of the key inputs and assumptions that were used in calculating the fair value or range of fair values disclosed in the preliminary prospectus under the heading “Credit Risk Retention” prior to the pricing of the certificates and (b) the valuation methodology or the key inputs and assumptions that were used in calculating the fair value set forth above under this “Credit Risk Retention” section.
A reasonable time after the Closing Date, the Retaining Sponsor will be required to disclose to, or cause to be disclosed to, Certificateholders the following: (a) the fair value of the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates that will be retained by the Third Party Purchaser based on actual sale prices and finalized tranche sizes, (b) the fair value of the “eligible horizontal residual interest” (as such term is defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) that the Retaining Sponsor is required to retain under the Credit Risk Retention Rules, and (c) to the extent the valuation methodology or any of the key inputs and assumptions that were used in calculating the fair value or range of fair values disclosed in the preliminary prospectus under the heading “Credit Risk Retention” prior to the pricing of the certificates materially differs from the methodology or key inputs and assumptions used to calculate the fair value at the time of closing, descriptions of those material differences. Any such disclosures are expected to be included in a Current Report on Form 8-K on or a reasonable period after the Closing Date.
Material Terms of the Eligible Horizontal Residual Interest
On any Distribution Date, the aggregate amount available for distributions from the Mortgage Loans, net of specified servicing and administrative costs and expenses, will be distributed to the Certificates in sequential order in accordance with their respective principal and interest entitlements (beginning with the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class X-A and Class X-B Certificates), in each case as set forth under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”. On any Distribution
342
Date, Realized Losses on the Mortgage Loans will be allocated first, to the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates (in reverse sequential order), second, to the Class D Certificates, third, to the Class C Certificates, fourth, to the Class B Certificates, fifth, to the Class A-S Certificates and sixth, to the Senior Certificates (other than the Class X Certificates), in each case until the Certificate Balance of that Class has been reduced to zero. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”.
For a description of other material terms of the Classes of Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates identified, see “Description of the Certificates” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
The Third Party Purchaser
It is anticipated that KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P. (the “Third Party Purchaser”), will act as the “third-party purchaser” by causing its “majority owned affiliate” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules) KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P. to purchase the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates set forth in the table above under “—Qualifying CRE Loans; Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage”, and will agree to hedging, transfer, financing and other restrictions applicable to a “third-party purchaser” (and its affiliates) under the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P. (“KKR Aggregator”), a Delaware limited partnership, is expected, to (i) act as the Third Party Purchaser and (ii) retain the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR and Class Z Certificates through its majority-owned affiliate (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules), KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners (AIV) Aggregator I L.P. (“AIV” and, together with KKR Aggregator, collectively, “KKR Opportunity Partners”), a Delaware limited partnership. KKR Opportunity Partners was formed primarily to invest in junior tranches of commercial mortgaged-backed securities (“CMBS B-Piece Securities”). As of December 31, 2017, KKR Opportunity Partners has purchased twelve offerings of CMBS B-Piece Securities subsequent to the implementation of the Credit Risk Retention Rules. KKR Opportunity Partners is advised by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”). KKR is an experienced commercial real estate debt investor. Certain senior members of KKR’s real estate credit team have over 20 years of CMBS experience as of September 30, 2017. Funds advised by KKR have made investments in floating-rate whole loans on transitional properties, subordinate debt, preferred equity and CMBS B-Piece Securities. As of September 30, 2017, funds advised by KKR own 31 separate real estate credit investments. As of September 30, 2017, KKR is responsible for approximately $153 billion in client or limited partner assets under management. KKR is registered as an investment adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
The Third Party Purchaser has represented to the depositor that solely for its own purposes and benefit, it has completed an independent review of the credit risk of each mortgage loan. The review consisted of a review of the sponsors’ underwriting standards as provided by the sponsors, the collateral securing each mortgage loan and expected cash flows related to the mortgage loans. Such review was based on the mortgage loan files and information regarding the mortgage loans provided by or on behalf of the sponsors and was not independently verified by the Third Party Purchaser. The Third Party Purchaser performed its due diligence solely for its own benefit. The Third Party Purchaser has no liability to any person or entity for the manner in which it conducted its due diligence or the extent of such due diligence. Third Party Purchaser’s review and conclusions may not be relied upon by anyone else and may not be construed as an approval or endorsement of the sponsors’ underwriting standards or of any mortgage loan or any loan level disclosure in this
343
prospectus. The Third Party Purchaser makes no representations or warranties with respect to any such underwriting standards, information or disclosure and has not independently verified the truth or accuracy of any representations and warranties made by the sponsors or any other party to the transaction or any related documents.
The Third Party Purchaser is not required to take into account the interests of any other investor in the certificates or any other party in conducting its due diligence or in exercising remedies or voting or other rights in its capacity as owner of its certificates or in making requests or recommendations to the sponsors as to the selection of the mortgage loans and the establishment of other transaction terms. Investors and other third parties are not entitled to rely on in any way the Third Party Purchaser’s due diligence or acceptance of a mortgage loan. The Third Party Purchaser’s acceptance of a mortgage loan does not constitute, and may not be construed as, an endorsement or approval of any such mortgage loan, the underwriting for such mortgage loan or of the originator of such mortgage loan.
The Third Party Purchaser will have no liability to any certificateholder for any actions taken by it and the pooling and servicing agreement will provide that each certificateholder, by its acceptance of a certificate, forever waives and releases any claims against Third Party Purchaser and such buyers, and their respective affiliates, in respect of such actions.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer”.
Hedging, Transfer and Financing Restrictions
The Third Party Purchaser will agree to hedging, transfer and financing restrictions related to its ownership of the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates consistent with all applicable hedging, transfer and financing restrictions that apply to “third party purchasers” under the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
These restrictions will include an agreement by the Third Party Purchaser not to transfer the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates (which, in the aggregate, are an “eligible horizontal residual interest” for this securitization) until February 27, 2023, except that the Third Party Purchaser will be permitted to transfer the Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates to a “majority-owned affiliate” as such term is defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules, at any time, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and the approval of the Retaining Sponsor. On and after that date, the Third Party Purchaser may transfer the eligible horizontal residual interest to a successor third-party purchaser as long as the Third Party Purchaser satisfies all applicable provisions of the Credit Risk Retention Rules, including providing the sponsors with complete identifying information for the successor third-party purchaser and the successor third-party purchaser agreeing to comply with the hedging, transfer, financing and other restrictions applicable to subsequent third-party purchasers (and its affiliates) under the Credit Risk Retention Rules.
The restrictions on hedging and transfer under the Credit Risk Retention Rules as in effect on the Closing Date of this transaction will expire on and after the date that is the latest of (i) the date on which the aggregate principal balance of the Mortgage Loans has been reduced to 33% of the aggregate principal balance of the Mortgage Loans as of the Cut-off Date; (ii) the date on which the total unpaid principal obligations under the certificates has been reduced to 33% of the aggregate total unpaid principal obligations under the certificates as of the Closing Date; or (iii) two years after the Closing Date.
344
Operating Advisor
The operating advisor for the transaction is Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, a New York limited liability company. As described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”, the operating advisor will, in general and under certain circumstances described in this prospectus, have the following responsibilities with respect to the Mortgage Loans:
● | review the actions of the special servicer with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan to the extent set forth in the PSA; |
● | review reports provided by the special servicer to the extent set forth in the PSA; |
● | review for accuracy certain calculations made by the special servicer; and |
● | issue an annual report generally setting forth whether the operating advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the special servicer is operating in compliance with the Servicing Standard with respect to its performance of its duties under the PSA with respect to Specially Serviced Loans. |
In addition, if the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that (1) the special servicer has failed to comply with the Servicing Standard and (2) a replacement of the special servicer would be in the best interest of the Certificateholders (as a collective whole), the operating advisor will have the right at any time to recommend the replacement of the special servicer with respect to the Mortgage Loans. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor—Recommendation of the Replacement of the Special Servicer” and “—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause”.
Further, after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the operating advisor will be required to consult on a non-binding basis with the special servicer with respect to Asset Status Reports prepared for each Specially Serviced Loan and with respect to Major Decisions in respect of the Mortgage Loans for which the operating advisor has received a Major Decision Reporting Package. The operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights as operating advisor under the PSA for this transaction with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or any related REO Property; provided, however, that the operating advisor may have limited consultation rights with a Non-Serviced Special Servicer pursuant to the Non-Serviced Pooling and Servicing Agreement. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”.
An “Operating Advisor Consultation Event” will occur when the Certificate Balances of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates in the aggregate (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of such classes) is 25% or less of the initial Certificate Balances of such classes in the aggregate.
The operating advisor will be entitled to compensation in the form of the Operating Advisor Fee, the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee and reimbursement of any Operating Advisor Expenses. For additional information, see “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Operating Advisor Compensation”.
The operating advisor is required to be an Eligible Operating Advisor at all times that it is acting as operating advisor under the PSA. As a result of the experience and independence
345
of Park Bridge Lender Services as described under “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”, the representations and warranties being given by Park Bridge Lender Services under the PSA and satisfaction that no payments have been made by any special servicer to Park Bridge Lender Services of any fees, compensation or other remuneration (x) in respect of its obligations under the PSA, or (y) for the appointment or recommendation for replacement of a successor special servicer to become the special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services qualifies as an Eligible Operating Advisor under the PSA.
For additional information regarding the operating advisor, a description of how the operating advisor satisfies the requirements of an Eligible Operating Advisor, a description of the material terms of the PSA with respect to the operating advisor’s obligations under the PSA and any material conflicts of interest or material potential conflicts of interest between the operating advisor and another party to this securitization transaction, see “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”.
The disclosures set forth in this prospectus under the headings referenced in the preceding paragraphs are hereby incorporated by reference in this “Credit Risk Retention—Operating Advisor” section.
Representations and Warranties
Each of UBS AG, New York Branch, Société Générale, Barclays, CCRE Lending, LCF, CIBC and Rialto will make the representations and warranties identified on Annex D-1 with respect to their respective Mortgage Loans, subject in each case to the exceptions to these representations and warranties set forth in Annex D-2, the “Exception Schedules”).
At the time of its decision to include the UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans in this transaction, UBS AG, New York Branch determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by UBS AG, New York Branch that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by UBS AG, New York Branch that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which UBS AG, New York Branch based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given.
At the time of its decision to include the Société Générale Mortgage Loans in this transaction, Société Générale determined either that the risks associated with the matters
346
giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower may resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by Société Générale that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by Société Générale that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which Société Générale based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given.
At the time of its decision to include its Mortgage Loans in this transaction, Barclays determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception in respect of its Mortgage Loans set forth on Annex D-2 were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as low loan to value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by Barclays that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by Barclays that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which Barclays based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given.
At the time of its decision to include the CCRE Mortgage Loans in this transaction, CCRE Lending determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as a low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property
347
type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower may resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by CCRE Lending that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by CCRE Lending that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which CCRE Lending based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given. Additional information regarding the applicable CCRE Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
At the time of the its decision to include the LCF Mortgage Loans in this transaction, LCF determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation: (i) affirmative borrower covenants to effect curative requirements, including the imposition of personal liability to the borrower and guarantor on a losses-only or full-recourse basis if risk-related events are triggered, or the requirement to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception; (ii) opinions of legal counsel, or other expert evaluations as to the materiality of related risks and remediation, as appropriate; (iii) cash or letter of credit funded reserves or the collateral assignments of similar security, or the imposition of cash management controls; (iv) insurance benefitting the loan, including title insurance, property and liability insurance, environmental insurance or lease-related insurance, among other things; (v) positive loan underwriting metrics (such as comparatively low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors); or (vi) other loan underwriting-related facts and circumstances reducing the related risk of default or loss, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, favorable sub-market conditions, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by LCF that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by LCF that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which LCF based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given.
At the time of its decision to include the CIBC mortgage loans in this transaction, CIBC determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the
348
mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by CIBC that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by CIBC that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which CIBC based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given.
At the time of its decision to include the Rialto Mortgage Loans in this transaction, Rialto Mortgage determined either that the risks associated with the matters giving rise to each exception set forth on Annex D-2 to this prospectus were not material or were mitigated by one or more compensating factors, including without limitation, reserves, title insurance or other relevant insurance, opinions of legal counsel, letters of credit, a full or partial recourse guaranty from the mortgage loan sponsor, a full or partial cash sweep, positive credit metrics (such as low loan-to-value ratio, high debt service coverage ratio or debt yield, or any combination of such factors), or by other circumstances, such as strong sponsorship, a desirable property type, strong tenancy at the related Mortgaged Property, the likelihood that the related mortgage loan borrower or a third party may (and/or is required to under the related loan documents) resolve the matter soon, any requirements to obtain rating agency confirmation prior to taking an action related to such exception, a determination by Rialto Mortgage that the acceptance of the related fact or circumstance by the related originator was prudent and consistent with market standards after consultation with appropriate industry experts or a determination by Rialto Mortgage that the circumstances that gave rise to such exception should not have a material adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the related Mortgaged Property or on any related lender’s security interest in such Mortgaged Property. However, there can be no assurance that the compensating factors or other circumstances upon which Rialto Mortgage based its decisions will in fact sufficiently mitigate those risks. In particular, we note that an evaluation of the risks presented by such exceptions, including whether any mitigating factors or circumstances are sufficient, may necessarily involve an assessment as to the likelihood of future events as to which no assurance can be given.
Additional information regarding the applicable Mortgage Loans, including the risks related thereto, is described under “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
Description of the Certificates
General
The certificates will be issued pursuant to a pooling and servicing agreement, among the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer (the “PSA”) and will represent in the aggregate the entire ownership interest in the issuing entity. The
349
assets of the issuing entity will consist of: (1) the Mortgage Loans and all payments under and proceeds of the Mortgage Loans received after the Cut-off Date (exclusive of payments of principal and/or interest due on or before the Cut-off Date and interest relating to periods prior to, but due after, the Cut-off Date); (2) any REO Property but, with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in such Whole Loan; (3) those funds or assets as from time to time are deposited in the accounts discussed in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Accounts” (such accounts collectively, the “Securitization Accounts”) (but, with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in such Whole Loan), if established; (4) the rights of the mortgagee under all insurance policies with respect to its Mortgage Loans; and (5) certain rights of the depositor under each MLPA relating to Mortgage Loan document delivery requirements and the representations and warranties of each mortgage loan seller regarding the Mortgage Loans it sold to the depositor.
The Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C8 will consist of the following classes: the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates (collectively, with the Class A-S certificates, the “Class A Certificates”), the Class X-A and Class X-B certificates (collectively, the “Class X Certificates”), and the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR, Class Z and Class R certificates.
The Class A Certificates (other than the Class A-S certificates) and the Class X Certificates are referred to collectively in this prospectus as the “Senior Certificates”. The Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates are referred to collectively in this prospectus as the “Subordinate Certificates”. The Class R certificates are sometimes referred to in this prospectus as the “Residual Certificates”. The Senior Certificates and the Subordinate Certificates are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “Regular Certificates”. The Senior Certificates (other than the Class X Certificates) and the Subordinate Certificates are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “Principal Balance Certificates”. The Class A Certificates, the Class X Certificates and the Class B and Class C certificates are also referred to in this prospectus as the “Offered Certificates”.
350
Upon initial issuance, the Principal Balance Certificates will have the respective Certificate Balances, and the Class X Certificates will have the respective Notional Amounts, shown below (in each case, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%):
Class |
Approx. Initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount |
Offered Certificates | |
A-1 | $ 23,231,000 |
A-2 | $ 68,276,000 |
A-SB | $ 35,465,000 |
A-3 | $ 284,000,000 |
A-4 | $ 320,645,000 |
X-A | $ 731,617,000 |
X-B | $ 185,517,000 |
A-S | $ 84,920,000 |
B | $ 54,871,000 |
C | $ 45,726,000 |
Non-Offered Certificates | |
D | $ 20,987,000 |
D-RR | $ 31,272,000 |
E-RR | $ 20,903,000 |
F-RR | $ 14,371,000 |
NR-RR | $ 40,500,891 |
Z | NAP |
R | NAP |
The “Certificate Balance” of any class of Principal Balance Certificates outstanding at any time represents the maximum amount that its holders are entitled to receive as distributions allocable to principal from the cash flow on the Mortgage Loans and the other assets in the issuing entity, all as described in this prospectus. On each Distribution Date, the Certificate Balance of each class of Principal Balance Certificates will be reduced by any distributions of principal actually made on, and by any Realized Losses actually allocated to, that class of Principal Balance Certificates on that Distribution Date. In the event that Realized Losses previously allocated to a class of Principal Balance Certificates in reduction of its Certificate Balance are recovered subsequent to such Certificate Balance being reduced to zero, holders of such class of Principal Balance Certificates may receive distributions in respect of such recoveries in accordance with the distribution priorities described under “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions” below.
The Residual Certificates will not have a Certificate Balance or entitle their holders to distributions of principal or interest.
The Class X Certificates will not have Certificate Balances, nor will they entitle their holders to distributions of principal, but the Class X Certificates will represent the right to receive distributions of interest in an amount equal to the aggregate interest accrued on their respective notional amounts (each, a “Notional Amount”). The Notional Amount of the Class X-A certificates will equal the aggregate of the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates outstanding from time to time. The initial Notional Amount of the Class X-A certificates will be approximately $731,617,000. The Notional Amount of the Class X-B certificates will equal the aggregate of the Certificate Balances of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates outstanding from time to time. The initial Notional Amount of the Class X-B certificates will be approximately $185,517,000.
351
The Class Z certificates will not have a Certificate Balance nor will they entitle their holders to distributions of principal, but the Class Z certificates will represent the right to receive Excess Interest received on the ARD Loan allocated as described under “—Available Funds—Excess Interest” below.
The Mortgage Loans (exclusive of Excess Interest) will be held by the lower-tier REMIC (the “Lower-Tier REMIC”). The certificates (other than the Class Z certificates) will be issued by the upper-tier REMIC (the “Upper-Tier REMIC”) (collectively with the Lower-Tier REMIC, the “Trust REMICs”). The Excess Interest will be held in a grantor trust (the “Grantor Trust”), beneficial ownership of which will be represented by the Class Z certificates.
Distributions
Method, Timing and Amount
Distributions on the certificates are required to be made by the certificate administrator, to the extent of available funds as described in this prospectus, on the 4th business day following each Determination Date (each, a “Distribution Date”). The “Determination Date” will be the 11th day of each calendar month (or, if the 11th calendar day of that month is not a business day, then the next business day) commencing in March 2018.
All distributions (other than the final distribution on any certificate) are required to be made to the Certificateholders in whose names the certificates are registered at the close of business on each Record Date. With respect to any Distribution Date, the “Record Date” will be the last business day of the month immediately preceding the month in which that Distribution Date occurs. These distributions are required to be made by wire transfer in immediately available funds to the account specified by the Certificateholder at a bank or other entity having appropriate facilities to accept such funds, if the Certificateholder has provided the certificate administrator with written wiring instructions no less than 5 business days prior to the related Record Date (which wiring instructions may be in the form of a standing order applicable to all subsequent distributions) or otherwise by check mailed to the Certificateholder. The final distribution on any certificate is required to be made in like manner, but only upon presentation and surrender of the certificate at the location that will be specified in a notice of the pendency of the final distribution. All distributions made with respect to a class of certificates will be allocated pro rata among the outstanding certificates of that class based on their respective Percentage Interests.
The “Percentage Interest” evidenced by any certificate (other than a Class Z or Class R certificate) will equal its initial denomination as of the Closing Date divided by the initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, of the related class.
The master servicer is authorized but not required to direct the investment of funds held in the Collection Account and any Companion Distribution Account maintained by it, in U.S. government securities and other obligations that satisfy criteria established by the Rating Agencies (“Permitted Investments”). The master servicer will be entitled to retain any interest or other income earned on such funds and the master servicer will be required to bear any losses resulting from the investment of such funds, as provided in the PSA. The certificate administrator (if such certificate administrator is not Wells Fargo Bank) is authorized but not required to direct the investment of funds held in the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account, the Upper-Tier REMIC Distribution Account, the Interest Reserve Account, the Excess Interest Distribution Account and the Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account in Permitted Investments. The certificate administrator will be entitled to retain any interest
352
or other income earned on such funds and the certificate administrator will be required to bear any losses resulting from the investment of such funds, as provided in the PSA.
Available Funds
The aggregate amount available for distribution to holders of the certificates on each Distribution Date (the “Available Funds”) will, in general, equal the sum of the following amounts (without duplication):
(a) the aggregate amount of all cash received on the Mortgage Loans (in the case of each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, only to the extent received by the issuing entity pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA and/or Intercreditor Agreement) and any REO Property that is on deposit in the Collection Account (in each case, exclusive of any amount on deposit in or credited to any portion of the Collection Account that is held for the benefit of the holder of any related Companion Loan), as of the close of business on the related P&I Advance Date, exclusive of (without duplication):
● | all scheduled payments of principal and/or interest and any balloon payments paid by the borrowers of a Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan (such amounts other than any Excess Interest, the “Periodic Payments”), that are due on a Due Date after the end of the related Collection Period, excluding interest relating to periods prior to, but due after, the Cut-off Date; |
● | all unscheduled payments of principal (including prepayments), unscheduled interest, liquidation proceeds, insurance proceeds and condemnation proceeds and other unscheduled recoveries received subsequent to the related Determination Date (or, with respect to voluntary prepayments of principal of each Mortgage Loan with a Due Date occurring after the related Determination Date, subsequent to the related Due Date) allocable to the Mortgage Loans; |
● | all amounts in the Collection Account that are due or reimbursable to any person other than the Certificateholders; |
● | with respect to each Actual/360 Loan and any Distribution Date occurring in each February or in any January occurring in a year that is not a leap year (in each case, unless such Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the related Withheld Amount to the extent those funds are on deposit in the Collection Account; |
● | with respect to each Actual/360 Mortgage Loan and the Distribution Date occurring in March 2018 (if and to the extent not already included in clause (a) of this definition for the subject Distribution Date), the related Interest Deposit Amount; |
● | all Excess Interest allocable to the Mortgage Loans (which is separately distributed to the Class Z certificates); |
● | all Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums; |
● | all amounts deposited in the Collection Account in error; and |
● | any amounts actually collected on a Mortgage Loan that represent late payment charges, demand charges or default interest, other than Prepayment Premiums, Yield Maintenance Charges or Excess Interest; |
353
(b) if and to the extent not already included in clause (a), the aggregate amount transferred from the REO Account allocable to the Mortgage Loans to the Collection Account for such Distribution Date;
(c) all Compensating Interest Payments made by the master servicer with respect to the Mortgage Loans with respect to such Distribution Date and P&I Advances made by the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, with respect to the Distribution Date (net of certain amounts that are due or reimbursable to persons other than the Certificateholders);
(d) with respect to each Actual/360 Loan and any Distribution Date occurring in each March (or February, if such Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the related Withheld Amounts as required to be deposited in the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account pursuant to the PSA;
(e) with respect to each Actual/360 Loan and the Distribution Date occurring in March 2018 (if and to the extent not already included in clause (a) of this definition for the subject Distribution Date), the related Initial Interest Deposit Amount; and
(f) the Gain-on-Sale Remittance Amount for such Distribution Date.
The “Collection Period” for each Distribution Date and any Mortgage Loan (including any Companion Loan) will be the period beginning with the day after the Determination Date in the month preceding the month in which such Distribution Date occurs (or, in the case of the first Distribution Date, commencing immediately following the Cut-off Date) and ending with the Determination Date occurring in the month in which such Distribution Date occurs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the last day of a Collection Period is not a business day, any Periodic Payments received with respect to Mortgage Loans (including any periodic payments for any Companion Loan) relating to such Collection Period on the business day immediately following such day will be deemed to have been received during such Collection Period and not during any other Collection Period.
“Due Date” means with respect to (i) any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, on or prior to its maturity date, the day of the month set forth in the related mortgage note on which each Periodic Payment is scheduled to be first due, (ii) any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, after its maturity date, the day of the month set forth in the related mortgage note on which each Periodic Payment on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, had been scheduled to be first due, and (iii) any REO Loan, the day of the month set forth in the related mortgage note on which each Periodic Payment on the related Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, had been scheduled to be first due.
The “Gain-on-Sale Entitlement Amount” for each Distribution Date will be equal to the aggregate amount of (i) the sum of (a) the aggregate portion of the Interest Distribution Amount for each Class of Regular Certificates that would remain unpaid as of the close of business on the related Distribution Date, and (b) the amount by which the Principal Distribution Amount exceeds the aggregate amount that would actually be distributed on the related Distribution Date in respect of such Principal Distribution Amount, and (ii) any Realized Losses outstanding immediately after such Distribution Date, to the extent such amounts would occur on such Distribution Date or would be outstanding immediately after such Distribution Date, as applicable, without the inclusion of the Gain-on-Sale Remittance Amount as part of the definition of Available Funds. The “Gain-on-Sale Remittance Amount” for each Distribution Date will be equal to the lesser of (i) the amount on deposit in the
354
Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account on such Distribution Date, and (ii) the Gain-on-Sale Entitlement Amount.
Each Mortgage Loan Seller will be required to deliver to the depositor on the Closing Date for deposit in the Interest Reserve Account, with respect to each of its Mortgage Loans that accrues interest on an Actual/360 Basis, a cash amount (the “Initial Interest Deposit Amount”) equal to two days of interest on the Cut-off Date Balance of such Mortgage Loan at the related Net Mortgage Rate.
Priority of Distributions
On each Distribution Date, for so long as the Certificate Balances or Notional Amounts of the Regular Certificates have not been reduced to zero, the certificate administrator is required to apply amounts on deposit in the Distribution Account, to the extent of the Available Funds, in the following order of priority:
First, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class X-A and Class X-B certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata in accordance with, the respective Interest Distribution Amounts for such classes;
Second, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, in reduction of the Certificate Balances of those classes, in the following priority:
(i) prior to the Cross-Over Date:
(a) to the Class A-SB certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Balance of the Class A-SB certificates is reduced to the Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance for such Distribution Date;
(b) to the Class A-1 certificates, in an amount up to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after any distributions specified in clause (a) above have been made on such Distribution Date), until the outstanding Certificate Balance of the Class A-1 certificates are reduced to zero;
(c) to the Class A-2 certificates, in an amount up to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after any distributions specified in clauses (a) and (b) above have been made on such Distribution Date), until the outstanding Certificate Balance of the Class A-2 certificates is reduced to zero;
(d) to the Class A-3 certificates, in an amount up to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after any distributions specified in clauses (a), (b) and (c) above have been made on such Distribution Date), until the outstanding Certificate Balance of the Class A-3 certificates is reduced to zero;
(e) to the Class A-4 certificates, in an amount up to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after any distributions specified in clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) above have been made on such Distribution Date), until the outstanding Certificate Balance of the Class A-4 certificates is reduced to zero; and
(f) to the Class A-SB certificates, in an amount up to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after any distributions specified in clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) above have been made on such Distribution Date), until the outstanding Certificate Balance of the Class A-SB certificates is reduced to zero;
355
(ii) on or after the Cross-Over Date, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, pro rata (based upon their respective Certificate Balances), up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates are reduced to zero;
Third, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, first up to an amount equal to, and pro rata based upon, the aggregate unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to each such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Fourth, to the Class A-S certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Fifth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class A-S certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Sixth, to the Class A-S certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Seventh, to the Class B certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Eighth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class B certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Ninth, to the Class B certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Tenth, to the Class C certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Eleventh, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates and the Class B certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class C certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Twelfth, to the Class C certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
356
Thirteenth, to the Class D certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Fourteenth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates, the Class B certificates and the Class C certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class D certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Fifteenth, to the Class D certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Sixteenth, to the Class D-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Seventeenth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates, the Class B certificates, the Class C certificates and the Class D certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class D-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Eighteenth, to the Class D-RR certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Nineteenth, to the Class E-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Twentieth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates, the Class B certificates, the Class C certificates, the Class D certificates and the Class D-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class E-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Twenty-first, to the Class E-RR certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Twenty-second, to the Class F-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Twenty-third, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates, the Class B certificates, the Class C certificates, the Class D certificates, the Class D-RR certificates and the Class E-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class F-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
357
Twenty-fourth, to the Class F-RR certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class;
Twenty-fifth, to the Class NR-RR certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such class;
Twenty-sixth, after the Certificate Balances of the Class A Certificates, the Class B certificates, the Class C certificates, the Class D certificates, the Class D-RR certificates, the Class E-RR certificates and the Class F-RR certificates have been reduced to zero, to the Class NR-RR certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Balance, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Balance is reduced to zero;
Twenty-seventh, to the Class NR-RR certificates, first up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such class, then interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such class; and
Twenty-eighth, to the Class R certificates, any remaining amounts.
The “Cross-Over Date” means the Distribution Date on which the Certificate Balances of the Subordinate Certificates have all previously been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses to those certificates.
Reimbursement of previously allocated Realized Losses will not constitute distributions of principal for any purpose and will not result in an additional reduction in the Certificate Balance of the class of certificates in respect of which a reimbursement is made.
Pass-Through Rates
The interest rate (the “Pass-Through Rate”) applicable to each class of certificates (other than the Class R certificates) for any Distribution Date will equal the rates set forth below:
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-1 certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 2.6590%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-2 certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 3.7130%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-SB certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 3.9030%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-3 certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 3.7200%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-4 certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 3.9830%.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class A-S certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 4.2150%, subject to a maximum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
358
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class B certificates will be a per annum rate equal to 4.5670%, subject to a maximum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class C certificates will be a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class D certificates will be a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class D-RR certificates will be a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class E-RR certificates will be a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class F-RR certificates will be a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate on the Class NR-RR certificates will be a per annum rate equal to the WAC Rate that corresponds to the related interest accrual period.
The Pass-Through Rate for the Class X-A certificates for any Distribution Date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date, over (b) the weighted average of the Pass-Through Rates on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates for such Distribution Date, weighted on the basis of their respective Certificate Balances immediately prior to that Distribution Date.
The Pass-Through Rate for the Class X-B certificates for any Distribution Date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the WAC Rate for the related Distribution Date, over (b) the weighted average of the Pass-Through Rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for the related Distribution Date, weighted on the basis of their respective Certificate Balances immediately prior to that Distribution Date.
The “WAC Rate” with respect to any Distribution Date is equal to the weighted average of the applicable Net Mortgage Rates of the Mortgage Loans (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) as of the first day of the related Collection Period, weighted on the basis of their respective Stated Principal Balances immediately following the preceding Distribution Date (or, in the case of the initial Distribution Date, as of the Closing Date).
The “Net Mortgage Rate” for each Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any REO Loan (other than the portion of the REO Loan related to any Companion Loan) is equal to the related Mortgage Rate then in effect (without regard to any increase in the interest rate of any ARD Loan after the related Anticipated Repayment Date), minus the related Administrative Cost Rate; provided, however, that for purposes of calculating Pass-Through Rates, the Net Mortgage Rate for any Mortgage Loan will be determined without regard to any modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of the related Mortgage Loan, whether agreed to by the master servicer, the special servicer, a Non-Serviced Master Servicer or a Non-Serviced Special Servicer or resulting from a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding involving the related borrower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for Mortgage Loans that do not accrue interest on a 30/360 Basis, then, solely for purposes of calculating the Pass-Through Rates and the WAC Rate, the Net Mortgage Rate of any Mortgage Loan for any one-month period preceding a related Due Date will be the annualized rate at which interest would have to accrue in respect of the Mortgage Loan on
359
the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months in order to produce the aggregate amount of interest actually required to be paid in respect of the Mortgage Loan during the one-month period at the related Net Mortgage Rate; provided, however, that with respect to each Actual/360 Loan, the Net Mortgage Rate for the one-month period (1) prior to the Due Dates in January and February in any year which is not a leap year or in February in any year which is a leap year (in either case, unless the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date) will be determined exclusive of Withheld Amounts, and (2) prior to the Due Date in March (or February, if the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), will be determined inclusive of Withheld Amounts for the immediately preceding February and January, as applicable. With respect to any REO Loan, the Net Mortgage Rate will be calculated as described above, as if the predecessor Mortgage Loan had remained outstanding.
“Administrative Cost Rate” as of any date of determination will be a per annum rate equal to the sum of the Servicing Fee Rate, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate and the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate.
“Mortgage Rate” with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any related Companion Loan is the per annum rate at which interest accrues on the Mortgage Loan or the related Companion Loan as stated in the related Mortgage Note or the promissory note evidencing such Companion Loan without giving effect to any default rate or Revised Rate.
Interest Distribution Amount
The “Interest Distribution Amount” with respect to any Distribution Date and each class of Regular Certificates will equal (A) the sum of (i) the Interest Accrual Amount with respect to such class for such Distribution Date and (ii) the Interest Shortfall, if any, with respect to such class for such Distribution Date, less (B) any Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall allocated to such class on such Distribution Date.
The “Interest Accrual Amount” with respect to any Distribution Date and any class of Regular Certificates will be equal to the interest for the related Interest Accrual Period accrued at the Pass-Through Rate for such class on the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, for such class immediately prior to that Distribution Date. Calculations of interest for each Interest Accrual Period will be made on 30/360 Basis.
An “Interest Shortfall” with respect to any Distribution Date for any class of Regular Certificates will be equal to the sum of (a) the portion of the Interest Distribution Amount for such class remaining unpaid as of the close of business on the preceding Distribution Date, and (b) to the extent permitted by applicable law, (i) other than in the case of certificates with a Notional Amount, one month’s interest on that amount remaining unpaid at the Pass-Through Rate applicable to such class for the current Distribution Date and (ii) in the case of the certificates with a Notional Amount, one-month’s interest on that amount remaining unpaid at the WAC Rate for such Distribution Date.
The “Interest Accrual Period” for each Distribution Date will be the calendar month prior to the month in which that Distribution Date occurs. Interest on the offered certificates will be calculated assuming that each month has 30 days and each year has 360 days.
360
Principal Distribution Amount
The “Principal Distribution Amount” for any Distribution Date will be equal to the sum of the following amounts:
(a) the Principal Shortfall for that Distribution Date,
(b) the Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount for that Distribution Date, and
(c) the Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount for that Distribution Date;
provided that the Principal Distribution Amount for any Distribution Date will be reduced, to not less than zero, by the amount of any reimbursements of:
(A) Nonrecoverable Advances (including any servicing advance with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA reimbursed out of general collections on the Mortgage Loans), with interest on such Nonrecoverable Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, that are paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans in a period during which such principal collections would have otherwise been included in the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, and
(B) Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans in a period during which such principal collections would have otherwise been included in the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date,
provided, further, that in the case of clauses (A) and (B) above, if any of the amounts that were reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans (including REO Loans) are subsequently recovered on the related Mortgage Loan (or REO Loan), such recovery will increase the Principal Distribution Amount for the Distribution Date related to the period in which such recovery occurs.
The “Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount” for each Distribution Date will equal the aggregate of the principal portions of (a) all Periodic Payments (excluding balloon payments) with respect to the Mortgage Loans due during or, if and to the extent not previously received or advanced and distributed to Certificateholders on a preceding Distribution Date, prior to the related Collection Period and all Assumed Scheduled Payments with respect to the Mortgage Loans for the related Collection Period, in each case to the extent paid by the related borrower as of the related Determination Date (or, with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Due Date occurring, or a grace period ending, after the related Determination Date, the related Due Date or last day of such grace period, as applicable, to the extent received by the master servicer as of the business day preceding the P&I Advance Date) or advanced by the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, and (b) all balloon payments with respect to the Mortgage Loans to the extent received on or prior to the related Determination Date (or, with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Due Date occurring, or a grace period ending, after the related Determination Date, the related Due Date or, last day of such grace period, as applicable, to the extent received by the master servicer as of the business day preceding the P&I Advance Date), and to the extent not included in clause (a) above. The Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount from time to time will include all late payments of principal made by a borrower with respect to the Mortgage Loans, including late payments in respect of a delinquent balloon payment, received by the times described above in this definition, except to the extent those late
361
payments are otherwise available to reimburse the master servicer or the trustee, as the case may be, for prior Advances, as described above.
The “Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount” for each Distribution Date will equal the aggregate of the following: (a) all prepayments of principal received on the Mortgage Loans as of the Determination Date; and (b) any other collections (exclusive of payments by borrowers) received on the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties on or prior to the related Determination Date whether in the form of Liquidation Proceeds, Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds, net income, rents, and profits from REO Property or otherwise, that were identified and applied by the master servicer as recoveries of previously unadvanced principal of the related Mortgage Loan; provided that all such Liquidation Proceeds and Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds will be reduced by any unpaid Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees, any amount related to the Loss of Value Payments to the extent that such amount was transferred into the Collection Account during the related Collection Period, accrued interest on Advances and other additional trust fund expenses incurred in connection with the related Mortgage Loan, thus reducing the Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount.
The “Assumed Scheduled Payment” for any Collection Period and with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is delinquent in respect of its balloon payment or any REO Loan (excluding, for purposes of any P&I Advances, the portion allocable to any related Companion Loan), is an amount equal to the sum of (a) the principal portion of the Periodic Payment that would have been due on such Mortgage Loan or REO Loan on the related Due Date based on the constant payment required by such related Mortgage Note or the original amortization schedule of the Mortgage Loan, as the case may be (as calculated with interest at the related Mortgage Rate), if applicable, assuming the related balloon payment has not become due, after giving effect to any reduction in the principal balance occurring in connection with a modification of such Mortgage Loan in connection with a default or a bankruptcy (or similar proceeding), and (b) interest on the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan or REO Loan (excluding, for purposes of any P&I Advances, the portion allocable to any related Companion Loan) at its Mortgage Rate (net of interest at the applicable rate at which the Servicing Fee is calculated).
The “Principal Shortfall” for any Distribution Date after the initial Distribution Date with respect to the Mortgage Loans means the amount, if any, by which (1) the related Principal Distribution Amount for the prior Distribution Date exceeds (2) the aggregate amount actually distributed on the preceding Distribution Date in respect of such Principal Distribution Amount.
The “Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance” for any Distribution Date is the balance shown for such Distribution Date in the table set forth in Annex E. Such balances were calculated using, among other things, certain weighted average life assumptions. See “Yield and Maturity Considerations—Weighted Average Life”. Based on such assumptions, the Certificate Balance of the Class A-SB certificates on each Distribution Date would be expected to be reduced to the balance indicated for such Distribution Date in the table set forth in Annex E. We cannot assure you, however, that the mortgage loans will perform in conformity with our assumptions. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the balance of the Class A-SB certificates on any Distribution Date will be equal to the balance that is specified for such Distribution Date in the table.
362
Certain Calculations with Respect to Individual Mortgage Loans
The “Stated Principal Balance” of each Mortgage Loan will be an amount equal to its unpaid principal balance as of the Cut-off Date or, in the case of a replacement Mortgage Loan, as of the date it is added to the trust, after application of all payments of principal due during or prior to the month of substitution, whether or not those payments have been received, minus the sum of:
(i) the principal portion of each Periodic Payment due on such Mortgage Loan after the Cut-off Date (or in the case of a replacement Mortgage Loan, due after the Due Date in the related month of substitution), to the extent received from the borrower or advanced by the master servicer;
(ii) all principal prepayments received with respect to such Mortgage Loan after the Cut-off Date (or in the case of a replacement Mortgage Loan, after the Due Date in the related month of substitution);
(iii) the principal portion of all Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds (to the extent allocable to principal on such Mortgage Loan) and Liquidation Proceeds received with respect to such Mortgage Loan after the Cut-off Date (or in the case of a replacement Mortgage Loan, after the Due Date in the related month of substitution); and
(iv) any reduction in the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan resulting from a valuation by a court in a bankruptcy proceeding that is less than the then outstanding principal amount of such Mortgage Loan or a modification of such Mortgage Loan pursuant to the terms and provisions of the PSA that occurred prior to the end of the Collection Period for the most recent Distribution Date.
The Stated Principal Balance of any REO Loan that is a successor to a Mortgage Loan, as of any date of determination, will be an amount equal to (x) the Stated Principal Balance of the predecessor Mortgage Loan as of the date of the related REO Property was acquired for U.S. federal tax purposes, minus (y) the sum of:
(i) the principal portion of any P&I Advance made with respect to such REO Loan; and
(ii) the principal portion of all Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds (to the extent allocable to principal on the related Mortgage Loan), Liquidation Proceeds and all income rents and profits received with respect to such REO Loan.
See “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans” below.
With respect to any Companion Loan on any date of determination, the Stated Principal Balance will equal the unpaid principal balance of such Companion Loan as of such date. On any date of determination, the Stated Principal Balance of any Whole Loan will equal the sum of the Stated Principal Balances of the related Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loan(s), as applicable, on such date.
With respect to any REO Loan that is a successor to a Companion Loan as of any date of determination, the Stated Principal Balance will equal (x) the Stated Principal Balance of the predecessor Companion Loan as of the date of the related REO acquisition, minus (y) the principal portion of any amounts allocable to the related Companion Loan in accordance with the related Intercreditor Agreement.
363
If any Mortgage Loan or REO Loan is paid in full or the Mortgage Loan or REO Loan (or any REO Property) is otherwise liquidated, then, as of the first Distribution Date that follows the end of the Collection Period in which that payment in full or liquidation occurred and notwithstanding that a loss may have occurred in connection with any liquidation, the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loan or REO Loan will be zero.
For purposes of calculating allocations of, or recoveries in respect of, Realized Losses, as well as for purposes of calculating the Servicing Fee, Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee, Operating Advisor Fee and Asset Representations Reviewer Fee payable each month, each REO Property (including any REO Property with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan held pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA) will be treated as if there exists with respect to such REO Property an outstanding Mortgage Loan and, if applicable, each related Companion Loan (an “REO Loan”), and all references to Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan and pool of Mortgage Loans in this prospectus, when used in that context, will be deemed to also be references to or to also include, as the case may be, any REO Loans. Each REO Loan will generally be deemed to have the same characteristics as its actual predecessor Mortgage Loan (or Companion Loan), including the same fixed Mortgage Rate (and, accordingly, the same Net Mortgage Rate) and the same unpaid principal balance and Stated Principal Balance. Amounts due on the predecessor Mortgage Loan (or Companion Loan) including any portion of it payable or reimbursable to the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator or the trustee, as applicable, will continue to be “due” in respect of the REO Loan; and amounts received in respect of the related REO Property, net of payments to be made, or reimbursement to the master servicer or special servicer for payments previously advanced, in connection with the operation and management of that property, generally will be applied by the master servicer as if received on the predecessor Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan.
With respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, no amounts relating to the related REO Property or REO Loan allocable to any related Companion Loan will be available for amounts due to the Certificateholders or to reimburse the issuing entity, other than in the limited circumstances related to Servicing Advances, indemnification, Special Servicing Fees and other reimbursable expenses related to such Serviced Whole Loan incurred with respect to such Serviced Whole Loan in accordance with the PSA.
Excess Interest
On each Distribution Date, the certificate administrator is required to distribute any Excess Interest received with respect to the ARD Loan on or prior to the related Determination Date to the holders of the Class Z certificates. Excess Interest will not be available to make distributions to any other class of certificates or to provide credit support for other classes of certificates or offset any interest shortfalls or to pay any other amounts to any other party under the PSA.
Application Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections or Whole Loan Collections
Absent express provisions in the related Mortgage Loan documents (and, with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, the related Intercreditor Agreement) or to the extent otherwise agreed to by the related borrower in connection with a workout of a Mortgage Loan, all amounts collected by or on behalf of the issuing entity in respect of any Mortgage Loan in the form of payments from the related borrower, Liquidation Proceeds, condemnation proceeds or insurance proceeds (excluding, if applicable, in the case of any Serviced Whole
364
Loan, any amounts payable to the holder of the related Companion Loan(s) pursuant to the related Intercreditor Agreement) will be applied in the following order of priority:
First, as a recovery of any unreimbursed Advances (including any Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount) with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and unpaid interest at the Reimbursement Rate on such Advances and, if applicable, unreimbursed and unpaid additional trust fund expenses;
Second, as a recovery of Nonrecoverable Advances and any interest on those Nonrecoverable Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, to the extent previously paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans (as described in the first proviso in the definition of Principal Distribution Amount);
Third, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First or Second above, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the excess of (i) unpaid interest (exclusive of default interest and Excess Interest) accrued on such Mortgage Loan at the related Mortgage Rate in effect from time to time through the end of the applicable mortgage interest accrual period, over (ii) after taking into account any allocations pursuant to clause Fifth below on earlier dates, the aggregate portion of the accrued and unpaid interest described in subclause (i) of this clause Third that either (A) was not advanced because of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts or (B) accrued at the related Net Mortgage Rate on the portion of the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan equal to any related Collateral Deficiency Amount in effect from time to time and as to which no P&I Advance was made;
Fourth, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First or Second, as a recovery of principal of such Mortgage Loan then due and owing, including by reason of acceleration of such Mortgage Loan following a default thereunder (or, if the Mortgage Loan has been liquidated, as a recovery of principal to the extent of its entire remaining unpaid principal balance);
Fifth, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the sum of (A) the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts, plus (B) any unpaid interest (exclusive of default interest and Excess Interest) that accrued at the related Net Mortgage Rate on the portion of the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan equal to any related Collateral Deficiency Amount in effect from time to time and as to which no P&I Advance was made (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of such accrued and unpaid interest pursuant to this clause Fifth on earlier dates);
Sixth, as a recovery of amounts to be currently allocated to the payment of, or escrowed for the future payment of, real estate taxes, assessments and insurance premiums and similar items relating to such Mortgage Loan;
Seventh, as a recovery of any other reserves to the extent then required to be held in escrow with respect to such Mortgage Loan;
Eighth, as a recovery of any Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
365
Ninth, as a recovery of any late payment charges and default interest then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Tenth, as a recovery of any assumption fees and Modification Fees then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Eleventh, as a recovery of any other amounts then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan other than remaining unpaid principal (if both consent fees and Operating Advisor Consulting Fees are due and owing, first, allocated to consent fees and then, allocated to Operating Advisor Consulting Fees);
Twelfth, as a recovery of any remaining principal of such Mortgage Loan to the extent of its entire remaining unpaid principal balance; and
Thirteenth, in the case of an ARD Loan after the related Anticipated Repayment Date, any accrued but unpaid Excess Interest;
provided that, to the extent required under the REMIC provisions of the Code, payments or proceeds received (or receivable by exercise of the lender’s rights under the related Mortgage Loan documents) with respect to any partial release of a Mortgaged Property (including in connection with a condemnation) at a time when the loan-to-value ratio of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan exceeds 125%, or would exceed 125% following any partial release (based solely on the value of real property and excluding personal property and going concern value, if any, unless otherwise permitted under the applicable REMIC rules as evidenced by an opinion of counsel provided to the trustee) must be collected and allocated to reduce the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan) in the manner required by such REMIC provisions.
Collections by or on behalf of the issuing entity in respect of any REO Property (exclusive of the amounts to be allocated to the payment of the costs of operating, managing, leasing, maintaining and disposing of such REO Property and, if applicable, in the case of any Serviced Whole Loan, exclusive of any amounts payable to the holder of the related Companion Loan(s), as applicable, pursuant to the related Intercreditor Agreement) will be applied in the following order of priority:
First, as a recovery of any unreimbursed Advances (including any Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount) with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and interest at the Reimbursement Rate on all Advances and, if applicable, unreimbursed and unpaid additional trust fund expenses with respect to the related Mortgage Loan;
Second, as a recovery of Nonrecoverable Advances and any interest on those Nonrecoverable Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, to the extent previously paid or reimbursed from principal collections on the Mortgage Loans (as described in the first proviso in the definition of Principal Distribution Amount);
Third, to the extent not previously so allocated pursuant to clause First or Second above, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the excess of (i) unpaid interest (exclusive of default interest and excess interest) accrued on such Mortgage Loan at the related Mortgage Rate in effect from time to time through the end of the applicable mortgage interest accrual period, over (ii) after taking into account any allocations pursuant to clause Fifth below or clause Fifth of the prior paragraph on earlier dates, the aggregate portion of the accrued and unpaid interest described in subclause (i) of this clause Third that either (A) was not advanced because of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such
366
Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts or (B) accrued at the related Net Mortgage Rate on the portion of the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan equal to any related Collateral Deficiency Amount in effect from time to time and as to which no P&I Advance was made;
Fourth, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First or Second, as a recovery of principal of such Mortgage Loan to the extent of its entire unpaid principal balance;
Fifth, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the sum of (A) the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts, plus (B) any unpaid interest (exclusive of default interest and Excess Interest) that accrued at the related Net Mortgage Rate on the portion of the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan equal to any related Collateral Deficiency Amount in effect from time to time and as to which no P&I Advance was made (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest pursuant to this clause Fifth or clause Fifth of the prior paragraph on earlier dates);
Sixth, as a recovery of any Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Seventh, as a recovery of any late payment charges and default interest then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Eighth, as a recovery of any assumption fees and Modification Fees then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;
Ninth, as a recovery of any other amounts then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan other than remaining unpaid principal (if both consent fees and Operating Advisor Consulting Fees are due and owing, first, allocated to consent fees and then, allocated to Operating Advisor Consulting Fees); and
Tenth, in the case of an ARD Loan after the related Anticipated Repayment Date, any accrued but unpaid Excess Interest.
Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums
If any Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium is collected during any particular Collection Period with respect to any Mortgage Loan, then on the Distribution Date corresponding to that Collection Period, the certificate administrator will pay that Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium in the following manner: (1) to each of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates, the product of (a) such Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium, (b) the related Base Interest Fraction for such class, and (c) a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the amount of principal distributed to such class for that Distribution Date, and the denominator of which is the total amount of principal distributed to such Classes of Principal Balance Certificates for that Distribution Date, (2) to the Class X-A certificates, the excess, if any, of (a) the product of (i) such Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium and (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the amount of principal distributed to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates for that Distribution Date, and the denominator of which is the total amount of principal distributed to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-
367
4, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates for that Distribution Date, over (b) the amount of such Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium distributed to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates as described above, and (3) to the Class X-B certificates, any remaining portion of such Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium not distributed as described above.
“Base Interest Fraction” means, with respect to any principal prepayment of any Mortgage Loan that provides for the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium, and with respect to any class of Principal Balance Certificates, a fraction (A) the numerator of which is the greater of (x) zero and (y) the difference between (i) the pass-through rate on that class, and (ii) the applicable Discount Rate and (B) the denominator of which is the difference between (i) the mortgage interest rate on the related Mortgage Loan and (ii) the applicable Discount Rate; provided, however, that:
● | under no circumstances will the Base Interest Fraction be greater than one; |
● | if the applicable Discount Rate is greater than or equal to the mortgage interest rate on the related Mortgage Loan and is greater than or equal to the pass-through rate on that class, then the Base Interest Fraction will equal zero; and |
● | if the applicable Discount Rate is greater than or equal to the mortgage interest rate on the related Mortgage Loan and is less than the pass-through rate on that class, then the Base Interest Fraction will be equal to 1.0. |
“Discount Rate” means, with respect to any principal prepayment of any Mortgage Loan that provides for the payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium—
● | if a discount rate was used in the calculation of the applicable Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium pursuant to the terms of the Mortgage Loan or REO Loan, that Discount Rate, converted (if necessary) to a monthly equivalent yield, or |
● | if a discount rate was not used in the calculation of the applicable Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium pursuant to the terms of the Mortgage Loan or REO Loan, the yield calculated by the linear interpolation of the yields, as reported in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 (519)—Selected Interest Rates under the heading “U.S. government securities/Treasury constant maturities” for the week ending prior to the date of the relevant prepayment (or deemed prepayment), of U.S. Treasury constant maturities with a maturity date, one longer and one shorter, most nearly approximating the maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, of that Mortgage Loan or REO Loan, such interpolated treasury yield converted to a monthly equivalent yield. |
For purposes of the immediately preceding bullet, the certificate administrator or the master servicer will select a comparable publication as the source of the applicable yields of U.S. Treasury constant maturities if Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 is no longer published.
“Prepayment Premium” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, any premium, fee or other additional amount (other than a Yield Maintenance Charge) paid or payable, as the context requires, by a borrower in connection with a principal prepayment on, or other early collection of principal of, that Mortgage Loan or any successor REO Loan with respect thereto (including any payoff of a Mortgage Loan by a mezzanine lender on behalf of the subject borrower if and as set forth in the related intercreditor agreement).
368
“Yield Maintenance Charge” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, any premium, fee or other additional amount paid or payable, as the context requires, by a borrower in connection with a principal prepayment on, or other early collection of principal of, a Mortgage Loan, calculated, in whole or in part, pursuant to a yield maintenance formula or otherwise pursuant to a formula that reflects the lost interest, including any specified amount or specified percentage of the amount prepaid which constitutes the minimum amount that such Yield Maintenance Charge may be.
No Prepayment Premiums or Yield Maintenance Charges will be distributed to the holders of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR, Class NR-RR, Class Z or Class R certificates.
For a description of Yield Maintenance Charges, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans” and “Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans—Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments”.
Assumed Final Distribution Date; Rated Final Distribution Date
The “Assumed Final Distribution Date” with respect to any class of certificates is the Distribution Date on which the Certificate Balance of that class of certificates would be reduced to zero based on the assumptions set forth below. The Assumed Final Distribution Date with respect to each class of Offered Certificates will in each case be as follows:
Class |
Assumed
Final | |
Class A-1 | September 2022 | |
Class A-2 | February 2023 | |
Class A-SB | May 2027 | |
Class A-3 | January 2028 | |
Class A-4 | February 2028 | |
Class X-A | NAP | |
Class X-B | NAP | |
Class A-S | February 2028 | |
Class B | February 2028 | |
Class C | February 2028 |
The Assumed Final Distribution Dates set forth above were calculated without regard to any delays in the collection of balloon payments and without regard to delinquencies, defaults or liquidations. Accordingly, in the event of defaults on the Mortgage Loans, the actual final Distribution Date for one or more classes of the Offered Certificates may be later, and could be substantially later, than the related Assumed Final Distribution Date(s).
In addition, the Assumed Final Distribution Dates set forth above were calculated on the basis of a 0% CPR prepayment rate and the Structuring Assumptions. Since the rate of payment (including prepayments) of the Mortgage Loans may exceed the scheduled rate of payments, and could exceed the scheduled rate by a substantial amount, the actual final Distribution Date for one or more classes of the Offered Certificates may be earlier, and could be substantially earlier, than the related Assumed Final Distribution Date(s). The rate of payments (including prepayments) on the Mortgage Loans will depend on the characteristics of the Mortgage Loans, as well as on the prevailing level of interest rates and other economic factors, and we cannot assure you as to actual payment experience.
The “Rated Final Distribution Date” for each class of Offered Certificates will be the Distribution Date in February 2051. See “Ratings”.
369
Prepayment Interest Shortfalls
If a borrower prepays a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan in whole or in part, after the due date but on or before the Determination Date in any calendar month, the amount of interest (net of related Servicing Fees and any Excess Interest that would have accrued) accrued on such prepayment from such due date to, but not including, the date of prepayment (or any later date through which interest accrues) will, to the extent actually collected (without regard to any Prepayment Premium or Yield Maintenance Charge actually collected) constitute a “Prepayment Interest Excess”. Conversely, if a borrower prepays a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan (with such prepayment allocated between the related Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan in accordance with the related Intercreditor Agreement) in whole or in part after the Determination Date (or, with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, as applicable, with a due date occurring after the related Determination Date, the related Due Date) in any calendar month and does not pay interest on such prepayment through the following Due Date, then the shortfall in a full month’s interest (net of related Servicing Fees and any Excess Interest) on such prepayment will constitute a “Prepayment Interest Shortfall”. Prepayment Interest Excesses (to the extent not offset by Prepayment Interest Shortfalls or required to be paid as Compensating Interest Payments) collected on the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, will be retained by the master servicer as additional servicing compensation.
The master servicer will be required to deliver to the certificate administrator for deposit in the Distribution Account (other than the portion of any Compensating Interest Payment described below that is allocable to a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) on the P&I Advance Date, without any right of reimbursement thereafter, a cash payment (a “Compensating Interest Payment”) in an aggregate amount, equal to the lesser of:
(i) the aggregate amount of Prepayment Interest Shortfalls incurred in connection with voluntary principal prepayments received in respect of the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (in each case other than a Specially Serviced Loan or a Mortgage Loan or any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan on which the special servicer allowed a prepayment on a date other than the applicable Due Date) for the related Distribution Date, and
(ii) the aggregate of (A) that portion of the master servicer’s Servicing Fees for the related Distribution Date that is, in the case of each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan and REO Loan for which such Servicing Fees are being paid in such Collection Period, calculated at a rate of 0.00125% per annum, (B) all Prepayment Interest Excesses received by the master servicer during such Collection Period with respect to the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) (and, so long as a Whole Loan is serviced under the PSA, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) subject to such prepayment and (C) to the extent earned on voluntary principal prepayments, net investment earnings payable to the master servicer for such Collection Period received by the master servicer during such Collection Period with respect to the applicable Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, as applicable, subject to such prepayment. In no event will the rights of the Certificateholders to the offset of the aggregate Prepayment Interest Shortfalls be cumulative.
370
If a Prepayment Interest Shortfall occurs with respect to a Mortgage Loan as a result of the master servicer allowing the related borrower to deviate (a “Prohibited Prepayment”) from the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents regarding principal prepayments (other than (v) any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, (w) subsequent to a default under the related Mortgage Loan documents or if the Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan, (x) pursuant to applicable law or a court order or otherwise in such circumstances where the master servicer is required to accept such principal prepayment in accordance with the Servicing Standard, (y)(i) at the request or with the consent of the special servicer or, (ii) for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred or is continuing and, other than with respect to an Excluded Loan, at the request or with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder or (z) in connection with the payment of any insurance proceeds or condemnation awards, unless the master servicer did not apply the proceeds thereof in accordance with the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents and such failure causes the shortfall), then for purposes of calculating the Compensating Interest Payment for the related Distribution Date, the master servicer will pay, without regard to clause (ii) above, the aggregate amount of Prepayment Interest Shortfalls with respect to such Mortgage Loan otherwise described in clause (i) above in connection with such Prohibited Prepayments.
Compensating Interest Payments with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan will be allocated among the related Mortgage Loan and the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan in accordance with their respective principal amounts, and the master servicer will be required to pay the portion of such Compensating Interest Payments allocable to the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan to the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer.
The aggregate of any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls resulting from any principal prepayments made on the Mortgage Loans to be included in the Available Funds for any Distribution Date that are not covered by the master servicer’s Compensating Interest Payments for the related Distribution Date and the portion of the compensating interest payments allocable to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan to the extent received from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer (the aggregate of the covered, as to the related Distribution Date, the “Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall”) will be allocated on that Distribution Date among each class of Regular Certificates, pro rata, in accordance with their respective Interest Accrual Amounts for that Distribution Date.
Subordination; Allocation of Realized Losses
The rights of holders of the Subordinate Certificates to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on the Mortgage Loans will be subordinated, to the extent described in this prospectus, to the rights of holders of the Senior Certificates. In particular, the rights of the holders of the Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates to receive distributions of interest and principal, as applicable, will be subordinated to such rights of the holders of the Senior Certificates. The Class A-S certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class B, Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates. The Class B certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates. The Class C certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates.
This subordination will be effected in two ways: (i) by the preferential right of the holders of a class of certificates to receive on any Distribution Date the amounts of interest and/or principal distributable to them prior to any distribution being made on such Distribution Date in respect of any classes of certificates subordinate to that class (as described above under “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”) and (ii) by the allocation
371
of Realized Losses to classes of certificates that are subordinate to more senior classes, as described below.
No other form of credit support will be available for the benefit of the Offered Certificates.
Prior to the Cross-Over Date, allocation of principal on any Distribution Date will be made first, to the Class A-SB certificates, until their Certificate Balance has been reduced to the Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance for the related Distribution Date, second, to the Class A-1 certificates, until their Certificate Balance has been reduced to zero, third, to the Class A-2 certificates, until their Certificate Balance has been reduced to zero, fourth, to the Class A-3 certificates, until their Certificate Balance has been reduced to zero, fifth, to the Class A-4 certificates, until their Certificate Balance has been reduced to zero and sixth, to the Class A-SB certificates, until their Certificate Balance has been reduced to zero. On or after the Cross-Over Date, allocation of principal will be made to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates that are still outstanding, pro rata (based upon their respective Certificate Balances), without regard to the Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance, until their Certificate Balances have been reduced to zero. See “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions” above.
Allocation to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, for so long as they are outstanding, of the entire Principal Distribution Amount for each Distribution Date will have the effect of reducing the aggregate Certificate Balance of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates at a proportionately faster rate than the rate at which the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the pool of Mortgage Loans will decline. Therefore, as principal is distributed to the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, the percentage interest in the issuing entity evidenced by the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates will be decreased (with a corresponding increase in the percentage interest in the issuing entity evidenced by the Subordinate Certificates), thereby increasing, relative to their respective Certificate Balances, the subordination afforded to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates by the Subordinate Certificates.
Following retirement of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates, the successive allocation on each Distribution Date of the remaining Principal Distribution Amount to the Class A-S certificates, the Class B certificates, the Class C certificates, the Class D certificates, the Class D-RR certificates, the Class E-RR certificates, the Class F-RR certificates and the Class NR-RR certificates, in that order, for so long as they are outstanding, will provide a similar, but diminishing benefit to those certificates (other than to the Class NR-RR certificates) as to the relative amount of subordination afforded by the outstanding classes of certificates with later sequential designations.
On each Distribution Date, immediately following the distributions to be made to the Certificateholders on that date, the certificate administrator is required to calculate the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Stated Principal Balance (for purposes of this calculation only, the aggregate Stated Principal Balance will not be reduced by the amount of principal payments received on the Mortgage Loans that were used to reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee from general collections of principal on the Mortgage Loans for Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts, to the extent those amounts are not otherwise determined to be Nonrecoverable Advances) of the Mortgage Loans, including any REO Loans (but in each case, excluding any Companion Loan) expected to be outstanding immediately following that Distribution Date is less than (ii) the
372
then-aggregate Certificate Balance of the Principal Balance Certificates after giving effect to distributions of principal on that Distribution Date (any such deficit, a “Realized Loss”).
The certificate administrator will be required to allocate any Realized Losses among the respective classes of Principal Balance Certificates in the following order, until the Certificate Balance of each such class is reduced to zero:
first, to the Class NR-RR certificates;
second, to the Class F-RR certificates;
third, to the Class E-RR certificates;
fourth, to the Class D-RR certificates;
fifth, to the Class D certificates;
sixth, to the Class C certificates;
seventh, to the Class B certificates; and
eighth, to the Class A-S certificates.
Following the reduction of the Certificate Balances of all classes of Subordinate Certificates to zero, the certificate administrator will be required to allocate Realized Losses among the Senior Certificates (other than the applicable Class X Certificates), pro rata, based upon their respective Certificate Balances, until their respective Certificate Balances have been reduced to zero.
Realized Losses will not be allocated to the Class Z or Class R certificates and will not be directly allocated to the Class X Certificates. However, the Notional Amounts of the classes of Class X Certificates will be reduced if the related classes of Principal Balance Certificates are reduced by such Realized Losses.
In general, Realized Losses could result from the occurrence of: (1) losses and other shortfalls on or in respect of the Mortgage Loans, including as a result of defaults and delinquencies on the related Mortgage Loans, Nonrecoverable Advances made in respect of the Mortgage Loans, the payment to the special servicer of any compensation as described in “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”, and the payment of interest on Advances and certain servicing expenses; and (2) certain unanticipated, non-Mortgage Loan specific expenses of the issuing entity, including certain reimbursements to the certificate administrator or trustee as described under “Transaction Parties—The Trustee and the Certificate Administrator”, and certain federal, state and local taxes, and certain tax-related expenses, payable out of the issuing entity, as described under “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations”.
Losses on each Whole Loan will be allocated, pro rata, between the related Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s), based upon their respective principal balances. With respect to the AB Whole Loans, losses will be allocated first to each related Subordinate Companion Loan until each such Subordinate Companion Loan is reduced to zero and then to the related Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loans (if any), pro rata, based upon their respective principal balances.
A class of Regular Certificates will be considered outstanding until its Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as the case may be, is reduced to zero. However, notwithstanding a
373
reduction of its Certificate Balance to zero, reimbursements of any previously allocated Realized Losses are required thereafter to be made to a class of Principal Balance Certificates in accordance with the payment priorities set forth in “—Distributions—Priority of Distributions” above.
Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information
Certificate Administrator Reports
On each Distribution Date, based in part on information delivered to it by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, the certificate administrator will be required to prepare and make available to each Certificateholder of record a Distribution Date Statement providing the information required under Regulation AB and in the form of Annex B relating to distributions made on that date for the relevant class and the recent status of the Mortgage Loans.
In addition, the certificate administrator will include (to the extent it receives such information) with respect to any Mortgage Loan that permits additional debt or mezzanine debt (A) the amount of any additional debt incurred during the related Collection Period, (B) the total DSCR calculated on the basis of the mortgage loan and such additional debt and (C) the aggregate loan-to-value ratio calculated on the basis of the mortgage loan and the additional debt in each applicable Form 10-D filed on behalf of the issuing entity.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, the certificate administrator is required to furnish to each person or entity who at any time during the calendar year was a holder of a certificate, a statement with (i) the amount of the distribution on each Distribution Date in reduction of the Certificate Balance of the certificates and (ii) the amount of interest distributed, the Interest Accrual Amount and the Interest Shortfall Amount, in each case, as to the applicable class, aggregated for the related calendar year or applicable partial year during which that person was a Certificateholder, together with any other information that the certificate administrator deems necessary or desirable, or that a Certificateholder or Certificate Owner reasonably requests, to enable Certificateholders to prepare their tax returns for that calendar year. This obligation of the certificate administrator will be deemed to have been satisfied to the extent that substantially comparable information will be provided by the certificate administrator pursuant to any requirements of the Code as from time to time are in force.
In addition, the certificate administrator will make available on its website (www.ctslink.com), to the extent received from the applicable person, on each Distribution Date to each Privileged Person the following reports (other than clause (1) below, the “CREFC® Reports”) prepared by the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the special servicer, as applicable (substantially in the form provided in the PSA, in the case of the Distribution Date Statement, which form is subject to change, and as required in the PSA in the case of the CREFC® Reports) and including substantially the following information:
(1) a report as of the close of business on the immediately preceding Determination Date, containing the information provided for in Annex B (the “Distribution Date Statement”);
(2) a Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (“CREFC®”) delinquent loan status report;
374
(3) a CREFC® historical loan modification/forbearance and corrected mortgage loan report;
(4) a CREFC® advance recovery report;
(5) a CREFC® total loan report;
(6) a CREFC® operating statement analysis report;
(7) a CREFC® comparative financial status report;
(8) a CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet;
(9) a CREFC® real estate owned status report;
(10) a CREFC® servicer watch list;
(11) a CREFC® loan level reserve and letter of credit report;
(12) a CREFC® property file;
(13) a CREFC® financial file;
(14) a CREFC® loan setup file (to the extent delivery is required under the PSA); and
(15) a CREFC® loan periodic update file.
The master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, may omit any information from these reports that the master servicer or the special servicer regards as confidential. Subject to any potential liability for willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence as described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Limitation on Liability; Indemnification”, none of the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator will be responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any information supplied to it by a borrower, a mortgage loan seller or another party to the PSA or a party under any Non-Serviced PSA that is included in any reports, statements, materials or information prepared or provided by it. Some information will be made available to Certificateholders by electronic transmission as may be agreed upon between the depositor and the certificate administrator.
Before each Distribution Date, the master servicer will deliver to the certificate administrator by electronic means:
● | a CREFC® property file; |
● | a CREFC® financial file; |
● | a CREFC® loan setup file (to the extent delivery is required under the PSA) |
● | a CREFC® loan periodic update file; and |
● | a CREFC® Appraisal Reduction Amount template (if provided for such Distribution Date). |
No later than two (2) calendar days following each Distribution Date (provided that if the second calendar day is not a business day, then the immediately succeeding business day),
375
the master servicer will deliver to the certificate administrator by electronic means a CREFC® Schedule AL File.
In addition, the master servicer (with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan or a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans that are not, and REO Properties that do not relate to, Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans), as applicable, is also required to prepare the following for each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and REO Property:
● | Within 45 days after receipt of a quarterly operating statement, if any, commencing within 45 days of receipt of such quarterly operating statement for the quarter ending June 30, 2018, a CREFC® operating statement analysis report but only to the extent the related borrower is required by the Mortgage Loan documents to deliver and does deliver, or otherwise agrees to provide and does provide, that information, for the Mortgaged Property or REO Property as of the end of that calendar quarter, provided, however, that any analysis or report with respect to the first calendar quarter of each year will not be required to the extent provided in the then current applicable CREFC® guidelines (it being understood that as of the Closing Date, the applicable CREFC® guidelines provide that such analysis or report with respect to the first calendar quarter (in each year) is not required for a Mortgaged Property unless such Mortgaged Property is analyzed on a trailing 12 month basis, or if the related Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) is on the CREFC® Servicer Watch List). |
● | Within 45 days after receipt of any annual operating statements or rent rolls (if and to the extent any such information is in the form of normalized year-end financial statements that has been based on a minimum number of months of operating results as recommended by CREFC® in the instructions to the CREFC® guidelines) commencing within 45 days of receipt of such annual operating statement for the calendar year ending December 31, 2018, a CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet, but only to the extent the related borrower is required by the Mortgage Loan documents to deliver and does deliver, or otherwise agrees to provide and does provide, that information, presenting the computation made in accordance with the methodology in the PSA to “normalize” the full year net operating income and debt service coverage numbers used by the master servicer to prepare the CREFC® comparative financial status report. |
Certificate Owners and any holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan who are also Privileged Persons may also obtain access to any of the certificate administrator reports upon request and pursuant to the provisions of the PSA. Otherwise, until the time Definitive Certificates are issued to evidence the certificates, the information described above will be available to the related Certificate Owners only if DTC and its participants provide the information to the Certificate Owners.
“Privileged Person” includes the depositor and its designees, the initial purchasers, the underwriters, the mortgage loan sellers, the master servicer, the special servicer (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Excluded Special Servicer), the trustee, the certificate administrator, any additional servicer designated by the master servicer or the special servicer, the operating advisor, any affiliate of the operating advisor designated by the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, any holder of a Companion Loan who provides an Investor Certification, any Non-Serviced Master Servicer, any master servicer or special servicer under any trust and servicing agreement or pooling and servicing agreement that creates a trust whose assets include any Serviced Companion Loan, any
376
person (including the Directing Certificateholder) who provides the certificate administrator with an Investor Certification and any nationally recognized statistical rating organization within the meaning of Section 3(a)(62) of the Exchange Act (“NRSRO”), including any Rating Agency, that delivers an NRSRO Certification to the certificate administrator, which Investor Certification and NRSRO Certification may be submitted electronically via the certificate administrator’s website; provided that in no event may a Borrower Party (other than a Borrower Party that is the special servicer) be entitled to receive (i) if such party is the Directing Certificateholder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder (each such party, as applicable, an “Excluded Controlling Class Holder”), any Excluded Information via the certificate administrator’s website unless a loan-by-loan segregation is later performed by the certificate administrator, in which case such access will only be prohibited with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Loans, and (ii) if such party is not the Directing Certificateholder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, any information other than the Distribution Date Statement; provided, however, that, if the special servicer obtains knowledge that it is a Borrower Party, the special servicer may not directly or indirectly provide any information solely related to any related Excluded Special Servicer Loan, which may include any asset status reports, Final Asset Status Reports (or summaries thereof), and such other information as may be specified in the PSA pertaining to such Excluded Special Servicer Loan to the related Borrower Party, any of the special servicer’s employees or personnel or any of its affiliates involved in the management of any investment in the related Borrower Party or the related Mortgaged Property or, to its actual knowledge, any non-affiliate that holds a direct or indirect ownership interest in the related Borrower Party, and will maintain sufficient internal controls and appropriate policies and procedures in place in order to comply with those obligations; provided, further, that the special servicer will at all times be a Privileged Person, despite such restriction on information; provided, further, however, that any Excluded Controlling Class Holder will be permitted to reasonably request and obtain from the master servicer or the special servicer, in accordance with terms of the PSA, any Excluded Information relating to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan with respect to which such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is not a Borrower Party (if such Excluded Information is not otherwise available via the certificate administrator’s website). Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, neither the master servicer nor the certificate administrator will have any obligation to restrict access by the special servicer or any Excluded Special Servicer to any information related to any Excluded Special Servicer Loan.
In determining whether any person is an additional servicer or an affiliate of the operating advisor, the certificate administrator may rely on a certification by the master servicer, the special servicer, a mortgage loan seller or the operating advisor, as the case may be.
“Borrower Party” means a borrower, a mortgagor, a manager of a Mortgaged Property, an Accelerated Mezzanine Loan Lender, or any Borrower Party Affiliate.
“Borrower Party Affiliate” means, with respect to a borrower, a mortgagor, a manager of a Mortgaged Property or an Accelerated Mezzanine Loan Lender, (a) any other person controlling or controlled by or under common control with such borrower, mortgagor, manager or Accelerated Mezzanine Loan Lender, as applicable, or (b) any other person owning, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the beneficial interests in such borrower, mortgagor, manager or Accelerated Mezzanine Loan Lender, as applicable. For purposes of this definition, “control” when used with respect to any specified person means the power to direct the management and policies of such person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise and the terms “controlling” and “controlled” have meanings correlative to the foregoing.
377
“Accelerated Mezzanine Loan Lender” means a mezzanine lender under a mezzanine loan that has been accelerated or as to which foreclosure or enforcement proceedings have been commenced against the equity collateral pledged to secure such mezzanine loan.
“Excluded Controlling Class Loan” means a Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan with respect to which the Directing Certificateholder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder is a Borrower Party.
“Excluded Information” means, with respect to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan, any information solely related to such Excluded Controlling Class Loan, which may include any asset status reports, Final Asset Status Reports (or summaries thereof), inspection reports related to Specially Serviced Loans conducted by the special servicer or any Excluded Special Servicer and which may include any operating advisor report regarding the special servicer’s net present value determination or any Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations, and any officer’s certificates supporting any determination that an Advance was (or, if made, would be) a Nonrecoverable Advance, or such other information as may be specified in the PSA specifically pertaining to such Excluded Controlling Class Loan and/or the related Mortgaged Properties, other than such information with respect to such Excluded Controlling Class Loan(s) that is aggregated with information of other Mortgage Loans at a pool level.
“Excluded Loan” means a Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan with respect to which the Directing Certificateholder or, except in the case of a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan or a Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the holder of the majority of the Controlling Class is a Borrower Party.
“Investor Certification” means a certificate (which may be in electronic form), substantially in the form attached to the PSA or in the form of an electronic certification contained on the certificate administrator’s website (which may be a click-through confirmation), representing (i) that such person executing the certificate is a Certificateholder, the Directing Certificateholder (to the extent such person is not a Certificateholder), a beneficial owner of a Certificate, a Companion Holder or a prospective purchaser of a Certificate (or any investment advisor, manager or other representative of the foregoing), (ii) that either (a) such person is not a Borrower Party, in which case such person will have access to all the reports and information made available to Certificateholders via the certificate administrator’s website under the PSA, or (b) such person is a Borrower Party, in which case (1) if such person is the Directing Certificateholder or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, such person will have access to all the reports and information made available to Certificateholders via the certificate administrator’s website under the PSA other than any Excluded Information as set forth in the PSA or (2) if such person is not the Directing Certificateholder or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, such person will only receive access to the Distribution Date Statements prepared by the certificate administrator, (iii) (other than with respect to a Companion Holder) that such person has received a copy of the final prospectus and (iv) such person agrees to keep any Privileged Information confidential and will not violate any securities laws; provided, however, that any Excluded Controlling Class Holder (i) will be permitted to obtain from the master servicer or the special servicer, in accordance with terms of PSA, any Excluded Information relating to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan with respect to which such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is not a Borrower Party (if such Excluded Information is not otherwise available via the certificate administrator’s website) and (ii) will be considered a Privileged Person for all other purposes, except with respect to its ability to obtain information with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Loan.
A “Certificateholder” is the person in whose name a certificate is registered in the certificate register or any beneficial owner thereof; provided, however, that solely for the
378
purposes of giving any consent, approval, waiver or taking any action pursuant to the PSA, any certificate registered in the name of or beneficially owned by the master servicer, the special servicer (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Excluded Special Servicer), the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, any mortgage loan seller, a Borrower Party, or any affiliate of any of such persons will be deemed not to be outstanding (provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, any Controlling Class certificates owned by an Excluded Controlling Class Holder will not be deemed to be outstanding as to such Excluded Controlling Class Holder solely with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Loan; and provided, further, that any Controlling Class certificates owned by the special servicer or an affiliate thereof will not be deemed to be outstanding as to the special servicer or such affiliate solely with respect to any related Excluded Special Servicer Loan), and the Voting Rights to which it is entitled will not be taken into account in determining whether the requisite percentage of Voting Rights necessary to effect any such consent, approval, waiver or take any such action has been obtained; provided, however, that the foregoing restrictions will not apply in the case of the master servicer, the special servicer (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any Excluded Special Servicer), the trustee, the certificate administrator, the depositor, any mortgage loan seller or any affiliate of any of such persons unless such consent, approval or waiver sought from such party would in any way increase its compensation or limit its obligations in the named capacities under the PSA, waive a Servicer Termination Event or trigger an Asset Review (with respect to an Asset Review and any mortgage loan seller, solely with respect to any related Mortgage Loan subject to the Asset Review); provided, further, that so long as there is no Servicer Termination Event with respect to the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, the master servicer and special servicer or such affiliate of either will be entitled to exercise such Voting Rights with respect to any issue which could reasonably be believed to adversely affect such party’s compensation or increase its obligations or liabilities under the PSA; and provided, further, that such restrictions will not apply to (i) the exercise of the special servicer’s, the master servicer’s or any mortgage loan seller’s rights, if any, or any of their affiliates as a member of the Controlling Class or (ii) any affiliate of the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator that has provided an Investor Certification in which it has certified as to the existence of certain policies and procedures restricting the flow of information between it and the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable.
“NRSRO Certification” means a certification (a) executed by an NRSRO or (b) provided electronically and executed by such NRSRO by means of a “click-through” confirmation on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in favor of the 17g-5 Information Provider that states that such NRSRO is a Rating Agency as such term is defined in the PSA or that such NRSRO has provided the depositor with the appropriate certifications pursuant to paragraph (e) of Rule 17g-5 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 17g-5”), that such NRSRO has access to the depositor’s 17g-5 Information Provider’s website, and that such NRSRO will keep such information confidential except to the extent such information has been made available to the general public.
Under the PSA, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, is required to provide or make available to the holders of any Companion Loan (or their designee including the master servicer or special servicer) certain other reports, copies and information relating to the related Serviced Whole Loan to the extent required under the related Intercreditor Agreement.
Certain information concerning the Mortgage Loans and the certificates, including the Distribution Date Statements, CREFC® reports and supplemental notices with respect to such Distribution Date Statements and CREFC® reports, may be provided by the certificate
379
administrator at the direction of the depositor to certain market data providers, such as Bloomberg, L.P., Trepp, LLC, Intex Solutions, Inc., BlackRock Financial Management Inc., Interactive Data Corporation, CMBS.com, Inc., Markit, Moody’s Analytics, RealINSIGHT and Thomson Reuters Corporation, pursuant to the terms of the PSA.
Upon the reasonable request of any Certificateholder that has delivered an Investor Certification to the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) and the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans), as applicable, may provide (or make available electronically) at the expense of such Certificateholder copies of any appraisals, operating statements, rent rolls and financial statements obtained by the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be; provided that in connection with such request, the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, may require a written confirmation executed by the requesting person substantially in such form as may be reasonably acceptable to the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, generally to the effect that such person will keep such information confidential and will use such information only for the purpose of analyzing asset performance and evaluating any continuing rights the Certificateholder may have under the PSA. Upon the request of any Privileged Person (other than the NRSROs) to receive copies of annual operating statements, budgets and rent rolls either collected by the master servicer or special servicer or caused to be prepared by the special servicer in respect of each REO Property, the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, will be required to deliver copies of such items to the certificate administrator to be posted on the certificate administrator’s website. Certificateholders will not, however, be given access to or be provided copies of, any Mortgage Files or Diligence Files.
Information Available Electronically
The certificate administrator will make available to any Privileged Person via the certificate administrator’s website initially located at www.ctslink.com (and will make available to the general public this prospectus, Distribution Date Statements, the PSA, the MLPAs and the SEC EDGAR filings referred to below):
● | the following “deal documents”: |
○ | this prospectus; |
○ | the PSA, each sub-servicing agreement delivered to the certificate administrator from and after the Closing Date, if any, and the MLPAs and any amendments and exhibits to those agreements; and |
○ | the CREFC® loan setup file delivered to the certificate administrator by the master servicer; |
● | the following “SEC EDGAR filings”: |
○ | any reports on Forms 10-D, ABS-EE, 10-K and 8-K that have been filed by the certificate administrator with respect to the issuing entity through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Retrieval (EDGAR) system; |
● | the following documents, which will be made available under a tab or heading designated “periodic reports”: |
○ | the Distribution Date Statements; |
○ | the CREFC® bond level files; |
380
○ | the CREFC® collateral summary files; |
○ | the CREFC® Reports, other than the CREFC® loan setup file (provided that they are received by the certificate administrator); and |
○ | the annual reports as provided by the operating advisor; |
● | the following documents, which will be made available under a tab or heading designated “additional documents”: |
○ | the summary of any Final Asset Status Report as provided by the special servicer; |
○ | any property inspection reports, any environmental reports and appraisals delivered to the certificate administrator in electronic format; |
○ | any appraisals delivered in connection with any Asset Status Report; |
○ | a detailed worksheet showing the calculation of each Appraisal Reduction Amount, Collateral Deficiency Amount, and Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount on a current and cumulative basis (provided that it is received by the certificate administrator); and |
○ | any CREFC® appraisal reduction template received by the certificate administrator; |
● | the following documents, which will be made available under a tab or heading designated “special notices”: |
○ | notice of any release based on an environmental release under the PSA; |
○ | notice of any waiver, modification or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan; |
○ | notice of final payment on the certificates; |
○ | all notices of the occurrence of any Servicer Termination Event received by the certificate administrator or any notice to Certificateholders of the termination of the master servicer or the special servicer; |
○ | any notice of resignation or termination of the master servicer or special servicer; |
○ | notice of resignation of the trustee or the certificate administrator, and notice of the acceptance of appointment by the successor trustee or the successor certificate administrator, as applicable; |
○ | any notice of any request by requisite percentage of Certificateholders for a vote to terminate the special servicer, the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer; |
○ | any notice to Certificateholders of the operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer and the related report prepared by the operating advisor in connection with such recommendation; |
381
○ | notice of resignation or termination of the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer and notice of the acceptance of appointment by the successor operating advisor or the successor asset representations reviewer; |
○ | notice of the certificate administrator’s determination that an Asset Review Trigger has occurred and a copy of any Asset Review Report Summary received by the certificate administrator; |
○ | any notice of termination of the sub-servicer; |
○ | officer’s certificates supporting any determination that any Advance was (or, if made, would be) a Nonrecoverable Advance; |
○ | any notice of the termination of the issuing entity; |
○ | any notice that a Control Termination Event has occurred or is terminated or that a Consultation Termination Event has occurred or is terminated; |
○ | any notice that an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred or is terminated; |
○ | any notice of the occurrence of an Operating Advisor Termination Event; |
○ | any notice of the occurrence of an Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event; |
○ | any Proposed Course of Action Notice; |
○ | any assessment of compliance delivered to the certificate administrator; |
○ | any Attestation Reports delivered to the certificate administrator; |
○ | any “special notices” requested by a Certificateholder to be posted on the certificate administrator’s website described under “—Certificateholder Communication” below; and |
○ | any notice or documents provided to the certificate administrator by the depositor or the master servicer directing the certificate administrator to post to the “special notices” tab; |
● | the “Investor Q&A Forum”; |
● | solely to Certificateholders and Certificate Owners that are Privileged Persons, the “Investor Registry”; and |
● | the “Risk Retention Special Notices” tab, which will contain any notices relating to ongoing compliance by the Retaining Sponsor with the Credit Risk Retention Rules and the certificate administrator will, in addition to posting the applicable notices on the “Risk Retention Special Notices” tab, provide email notification to any Privileged Person (other than market data providers) that has registered to receive access to the certificate administrator’s website that a notice has been posted to the “Risk Retention Special Notices” tab; |
provided that with respect to a Control Termination Event or a Consultation Termination Event that is deemed to exist due solely to the existence of an Excluded Loan, the certificate administrator will only be required to provide notice of the occurrence and continuance of
382
such event if it has been notified of or has knowledge of the existence of such Excluded Loan.
In the event that UBS AG, New York Branch in its capacity as the retaining sponsor determines that the Third Party Purchaser no longer complies with certain specified provisions of the Credit Risk Retention Rules, it will be required to send a notice in writing of such non-compliance to the Certificate Administrator who will post such notice on its website under the “Risk Retention Special Notices” tab. Notwithstanding the description set forth above, for purposes of obtaining information or access to the certificate administrator’s website, all Excluded Information will be made available under one separate tab or heading rather than under the headings described above in the preceding paragraph.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Directing Certificateholder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, as applicable, is an Excluded Controlling Class Holder, such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is required to promptly notify the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the trustee and the certificate administrator pursuant to the PSA and provide an Investor Certification pursuant to the PSA and will not be entitled to access any Excluded Information (unless a loan-by-loan segregation is later performed by the certificate administrator in which case such access will only be prohibited with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Loan(s)) made available on the certificate administrator’s website for so long as it is an Excluded Controlling Class Holder. The PSA will require each Excluded Controlling Class Holder in such new Investor Certification to certify that it acknowledges and agrees that it is prohibited from accessing, reviewing and using any Excluded Information. In addition, if the Directing Certificateholder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder is not an Excluded Controlling Class Holder, such person will certify and agree that they will not share any Excluded Information with any Excluded Controlling Class Holder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing set forth in the PSA will prohibit the Directing Certificateholder or any Controlling Class Certificateholder from receiving, requesting or reviewing any Excluded Information relating to any Excluded Controlling Class Loan with respect to which the Directing Certificateholder or such Controlling Class Certificateholder is not a Borrower Party and, if such Excluded Information is not available via the certificate administrator’s website, such Directing Certificateholder or Controlling Class Certificateholder that is not a Borrower Party with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Loan will be permitted to reasonably request and obtain such information in accordance with terms of the PSA, and each of the master servicer and the special servicer may require and rely on such certifications and other reasonable information prior to releasing any such information.
Any reports on Form 10-D filed by the certificate administrator will (i) contain the information required by Rule 15Ga-1(a) concerning all Mortgage Loans held by the issuing entity that were the subject of a demand to repurchase or replace due to a breach or alleged breach of one or more representations and warranties made by the related mortgage loan seller, (ii) contain a reference to the most recent Form ABS-15G filed by the depositor and the mortgage loan sellers, if applicable, and the SEC’s assigned “Central Index Key” for each such filer, (iii) contain certain account balances to the extent available to the certificate administrator, and (iv) incorporate the most recent Form ABS-EE filing by reference (which such Form ABS-EE will be filed prior to the filing of the applicable report on Form 10-D).
The certificate administrator will not make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any report, document or other information made available on the certificate administrator’s website or its filing of such information pursuant to the PSA,
383
including, but not limited to, filing via EDGAR, and will assume no responsibility for any such report, document or other information, other than with respect to such reports, documents or other information prepared by the certificate administrator. In addition, the certificate administrator may disclaim responsibility for any information distributed by it or filed by it, as applicable, for which it is not the original source.
In connection with providing access to the certificate administrator’s website (other than with respect to access provided to the general public in accordance with the PSA), the certificate administrator may require registration and the acceptance of a disclaimer, including an agreement to keep certain nonpublic information made available on the website confidential, as required under the PSA. The certificate administrator will not be liable for the dissemination of information in accordance with the PSA.
The certificate administrator will make the “Investor Q&A Forum” available to Privileged Persons via the certificate administrator’s website under a tab or heading designated “Investor Q&A Forum”, where (i) Certificateholders and beneficial owners that are Privileged Persons may submit inquiries to (a) the certificate administrator relating to the Distribution Date Statements, (b) the master servicer or special servicer relating to servicing reports prepared by that party, the Mortgage Loans (excluding each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or the related Mortgaged Properties or (c) the operating advisor relating to annual or other reports prepared by the operating advisor or actions by the special servicer referenced in such reports, and (ii) Privileged Persons may view previously submitted inquiries and related answers. The certificate administrator will forward such inquiries to the appropriate person and, in the case of an inquiry relating to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the applicable party under the related Non-Serviced PSA. The certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer or the operating advisor, as applicable, will be required to answer each inquiry, unless such party determines in its respective sole discretion that (i) the question is beyond the scope of the topics detailed above, (ii) answering the inquiry would not be in the best interests of the issuing entity and/or the Certificateholders, (iii) answering the inquiry would be in violation of applicable law, the PSA or the Mortgage Loan documents, (iv) answering the inquiry would materially increase the duties of, or result in significant additional cost or expense to, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer or the operating advisor, as applicable, (v) answering the inquiry would require the disclosure of Privileged Information (subject to the Privileged Information Exception), (vi) answering the inquiry would or is reasonably expected to result in a waiver of an attorney-client privilege or the disclosure of attorney work product, or (vii) answering the inquiry is otherwise, for any reason, not advisable. In addition, no party will post or otherwise disclose any direct communications with the Directing Certificateholder as part of its responses to any inquiries. In the case of an inquiry relating to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the certificate administrator is required to make reasonable efforts to obtain an answer from the applicable party under the related Non-Serviced PSA; provided that the certificate administrator will not be responsible for the content of such answer, or any delay or failure to obtain such answer. The certificate administrator will be required to post the inquiries and related answers, if any, on the Investor Q&A Forum, subject to and in accordance with the PSA. The Investor Q&A Forum will not reflect questions, answers and other communications that are not submitted through the certificate administrator’s website. Answers posted on the Investor Q&A Forum will be attributable only to the respondent, and will not be deemed to be answers from any of the depositor, the underwriters or any of their respective affiliates. None of the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor, the depositor, any of their respective affiliates or any other person will certify as to the accuracy of any of the information posted in the Investor Q&A Forum and no such person will have any responsibility or liability for the content of any such information.
384
The certificate administrator will make the “Investor Registry” available to any Certificateholder and beneficial owner that is a Privileged Person via the certificate administrator’s website. Certificateholders and beneficial owners may register on a voluntary basis for the “Investor Registry” and obtain contact information for any other Certificateholder or beneficial owner that has also registered, provided that they comply with certain requirements as provided for in the PSA.
The certificate administrator’s internet website will initially be located at www.ctslink.com. Access will be provided by the certificate administrator to such persons upon receipt by the certificate administrator from such person of an Investor Certification or NRSRO Certification in the form(s) attached to the PSA, which form(s) will also be located on and may be submitted electronically via the certificate administrator’s internet website. The parties to the PSA will not be required to provide that certification. In connection with providing access to the certificate administrator’s internet website, the certificate administrator may require registration and the acceptance of a disclaimer. The certificate administrator will not be liable for the dissemination of information in accordance with the terms of the PSA. The certificate administrator will make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such documents and will assume no responsibility for them. In addition, the certificate administrator may disclaim responsibility for any information distributed by the certificate administrator for which it is not the original source. Assistance in using the certificate administrator’s internet website can be obtained by calling the certificate administrator’s customer service desk at 866-846-4526.
The certificate administrator is responsible for the preparation of tax returns on behalf of the issuing entity and the preparation of Distribution Reports on Form 10-D (based on information included in each monthly Distribution Date Statement and other information provided by other transaction parties) and Annual Reports on Form 10-K and certain other reports on Form 8-K that are required to be filed with the SEC on behalf of the issuing entity.
“17g-5 Information Provider” means the certificate administrator.
The PSA will permit the master servicer and the special servicer, at their respective sole cost and expense, to make available by electronic media, bulletin board service or internet website any reports or other information the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, is required or permitted to provide to any party to the PSA, the Rating Agencies or any Certificateholder or any prospective Certificateholder that has provided the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, with an Investor Certification or has executed a “click-through” confidentiality agreement in accordance with the PSA to the extent such action does not conflict with the terms of the PSA (including, without limitation, any requirements to keep Privileged Information confidential), the terms of the Mortgage Loans or applicable law. However, the availability of such information or reports on the internet or similar electronic media will not be deemed to satisfy any specific delivery requirements in the PSA except as set forth therein.
Except as otherwise set forth in this paragraph, until the time definitive certificates are issued, notices and statements required to be mailed to holders of certificates will be available to Certificate Owners of certificates only to the extent they are forwarded by or otherwise available through DTC and its Participants. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Participants, and by Participants to Certificate Owners, will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Except as otherwise set forth in this paragraph, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator and the depositor are required to recognize as Certificateholders only those
385
persons in whose names the certificates are registered on the books and records of the certificate registrar. The initial registered holder of the certificates will be Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC.
Voting Rights
At all times during the term of the PSA, the voting rights for the certificates (the “Voting Rights”) will be allocated among the respective classes of Certificateholders as follows:
(1) 2% in the case of the Class X Certificates, allocated pro rata, based upon their respective Notional Amounts as of the date of determination, and
(2) in the case of any Principal Balance Certificates, a percentage equal to the product of 98% and a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the aggregate Certificate Balance (and solely in connection with certain votes relating to the replacement of the special servicer, the operating advisor or asset representations reviewer as described in this prospectus, taking into account any notional reduction in the Certificate Balance for Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to the certificates) of the class, in each case, determined as of the prior Distribution Date, and the denominator of which is equal to the aggregate Certificate Balance (and solely in connection with certain votes relating to the replacement of the special servicer, operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer as described in this prospectus, taking into account any notional reduction in the Certificate Balance for Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to the certificates) of the Principal Balance Certificates, each determined as of the prior Distribution Date.
The Voting Rights of any class of certificates are required to be allocated among Certificateholders of such class in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests.
Neither the Class Z nor the Class R certificates will be entitled to any Voting Rights.
Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination
The Offered Certificates (other than the Class X Certificates) will be issued, maintained and transferred in the book-entry form only in minimum denominations of $10,000 initial Certificate Balance, and in multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The Class X Certificates will be issued, maintained and transferred only in minimum denominations of authorized initial Notional Amounts of not less than $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000.
Book-Entry Registration
The Offered Certificates will initially be represented by one or more global certificates for each such class registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). The depositor has been informed by DTC that DTC’s nominee will be Cede & Co. No holder of an Offered Certificate will be entitled to receive a certificate issued in fully registered, certificated form (each, a “Definitive Certificate”) representing its interest in such class, except under the limited circumstances described under “―Definitive Certificates” below. Unless and until Definitive Certificates are issued, all references to actions by holders of the Offered Certificates will refer to actions taken by DTC upon instructions received from holders of Offered Certificates through its participating organizations (together with Clearstream Banking, société anonyme (“Clearstream”) and Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System (“Euroclear”) participating organizations, the “Participants”), and all references in this prospectus to payments, notices, reports, statements and other information to holders of Offered Certificates will
386
refer to payments, notices, reports and statements to DTC or Cede & Co., as the registered holder of the Offered Certificates, for distribution to holders of Offered Certificates through its Participants in accordance with DTC procedures; provided, however, that to the extent that the party to the PSA responsible for distributing any report, statement or other information has been provided in writing with the name of the Certificate Owner of such an Offered Certificate (or the prospective transferee of such Certificate Owner), such report, statement or other information will be provided to such Certificate Owner (or prospective transferee).
Until Definitive Certificates are issued in respect of the Offered Certificates, interests in the Offered Certificates will be transferred on the book-entry records of DTC and its Participants. The certificate administrator will initially serve as certificate registrar for purposes of recording and otherwise providing for the registration of the Offered Certificates.
Holders of Offered Certificates may hold their certificates through DTC (in the United States) or Clearstream or Euroclear (in Europe) if they are Participants of such system, or indirectly through organizations that are participants in such systems. Clearstream and Euroclear will hold omnibus positions on behalf of the Clearstream Participants and the Euroclear Participants, respectively, through customers’ securities accounts in Clearstream’s and Euroclear’s names on the books of their respective depositories (collectively, the “Depositories”), which in turn will hold such positions in customers’ securities accounts in the Depositories’ names on the books of DTC. DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold securities for its Participants and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Participants through electronic computerized book-entries, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Participants (“DTC Participants”) include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations. Indirect access to the DTC system also is available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”).
Transfers between DTC Participants will occur in accordance with DTC rules. Transfers between Clearstream Participants and Euroclear Participants will occur in accordance with the applicable rules and operating procedures of Clearstream and Euroclear.
Cross-market transfers between persons holding directly or indirectly through DTC, on the one hand, and directly through Clearstream Participants or Euroclear Participants, on the other, will be effected in DTC in accordance with DTC rules on behalf of the relevant European international clearing system by its Depository; however, such cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to the relevant European international clearing system by the counterparty in such system in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its established deadlines (European time). The relevant European international clearing system will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its Depository to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving securities in DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Clearstream Participants and Euroclear Participants may not deliver instructions directly to the Depositories.
387
Because of time-zone differences, credits of securities in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of a transaction with a DTC Participant will be made during the subsequent securities settlement processing, dated the business day following the DTC settlement date, and such credits or any transactions in such securities settled during such processing will be reported to the relevant Clearstream Participant or Euroclear Participant on such business day. Cash received in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of sales of securities by or through a Clearstream Participant or a Euroclear Participant to a DTC Participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement date but will be available in the relevant Clearstream or Euroclear cash account only as of the business day following settlement in DTC.
The holders of Offered Certificates that are not Participants or Indirect Participants but desire to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other interests in, such Offered Certificates may do so only through Participants and Indirect Participants. In addition, holders of Offered Certificates in global form (“Certificate Owners”) will receive all distributions of principal and interest through the Participants who in turn will receive them from DTC. Under a book-entry format, holders of such Offered Certificates may experience some delay in their receipt of payments, since such payments will be forwarded by the certificate administrator to Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. DTC will forward such payments to its Participants, which thereafter will forward them to Indirect Participants or the applicable Certificate Owners. Certificate Owners will not be recognized by the trustee, the certificate administrator, the certificate registrar, the operating advisor, the special servicer or the master servicer as holders of record of certificates and Certificate Owners will be permitted to receive information furnished to Certificateholders and to exercise the rights of Certificateholders only indirectly through DTC and its Participants and Indirect Participants, except that Certificate Owners will be entitled to receive or have access to notices and information and to exercise certain rights as holders of beneficial interests in the certificates through the certificate administrator and the trustee to the extent described in “—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”, “—Certificateholder Communication” and “—List of Certificateholders” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Operating Advisor”, “—The Asset Representations Reviewer”, “—Replacement of Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote”, “—Limitation on Rights of Certificateholders to Institute a Proceeding”, “—Termination; Retirement of Certificates” and “—Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator”.
Under the rules, regulations and procedures creating and affecting DTC and its operations (the “DTC Rules”), DTC is required to make book-entry transfers of Offered Certificates in global form among Participants on whose behalf it acts with respect to such Offered Certificates and to receive and transmit distributions of principal of, and interest on, such Offered Certificates. Participants and Indirect Participants with which the Certificate Owners have accounts with respect to the Offered Certificates similarly are required to make book-entry transfers and receive and transmit such payments on behalf of their respective Certificate Owners. Accordingly, although the Certificate Owners will not possess the Offered Certificates, the DTC Rules provide a mechanism by which Certificate Owners will receive payments on Offered Certificates and will be able to transfer their interest.
Because DTC can only act on behalf of Participants, who in turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants and certain banks, the ability of a holder of Offered Certificates in global form to pledge such Offered Certificates to persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system, or to otherwise act with respect to such Offered Certificates, may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate for such Offered Certificates.
DTC has advised the depositor that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of an Offered Certificate under the PSA only at the direction of one or more
388
Participants to whose accounts with DTC such certificate is credited. DTC may take conflicting actions with respect to other undivided interests to the extent that such actions are taken on behalf of Participants whose holdings include such undivided interests.
Clearstream is incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg and is a global securities settlement clearing house. Clearstream holds securities for its participating organizations (“Clearstream Participants”) and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Clearstream Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of Clearstream Participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Transactions may be settled in Clearstream in numerous currencies, including United States dollars. Clearstream provides to its Clearstream Participants, among other things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing. Clearstream interfaces with domestic markets in several countries. Clearstream is regulated as a bank by the Luxembourg Monetary Institute. Clearstream Participants are recognized financial institutions around the world, including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to Clearstream is also available to others, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Clearstream Participant, either directly or indirectly.
Euroclear was created in 1968 to hold securities for participants of the Euroclear system (“Euroclear Participants”) and to clear and settle transactions between Euroclear Participants through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash. Transactions may now be settled in any of numerous currencies, including United States dollars. The Euroclear system includes various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described above. Euroclear is operated by Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (the “Euroclear Operator”). All operations are conducted by the Euroclear Operator, and all Euroclear securities clearance accounts and Euroclear cash accounts are accounts with the Euroclear Operator. Euroclear Participants include banks (including central banks), securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial intermediaries and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to the Euroclear system is also available to other firms that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Euroclear Participant, either directly or indirectly.
Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with the Euroclear Operator are governed by the Terms and Conditions Governing Use of Euroclear and the related operating procedures of the Euroclear System and applicable Belgian law (collectively, the “Terms and Conditions”). The Terms and Conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within the Euroclear system, withdrawal of securities and cash from the Euroclear system, and receipts of payments with respect to securities in the Euroclear system. All securities in the Euroclear system are held on a fungible basis without attribution of specific certificates to specific securities clearance accounts. The Euroclear Operator acts under the Terms and Conditions only on behalf of Euroclear Participants and has no record of or relationship with persons holding through Euroclear Participants.
Although DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have implemented the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of interests in book-entry securities among Participants of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream, they are under no obligation to perform or to continue to comply with such procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued at any time. None of the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer
389
or the underwriters will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their respective direct or indirect Participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.
Definitive Certificates
Owners of beneficial interests in book-entry certificates of any class will not be entitled to receive physical delivery of Definitive Certificates unless: (i) DTC advises the certificate registrar in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its responsibilities as depository with respect to the book-entry certificates of such class or ceases to be a clearing agency, and the certificate administrator and DTC are unable to locate a qualified successor within 90 days of such notice or (ii) the trustee has instituted or has been directed to institute any judicial proceeding to enforce the rights of the Certificateholders of such class and the trustee has been advised by counsel that in connection with such proceeding it is necessary or appropriate for the trustee or certificate administrator to obtain possession of the certificates of such class.
Certificateholder Communication
Access to Certificateholders’ Names and Addresses
Upon the written request of any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner that has delivered an executed Investor Certification to the trustee or the certificate administrator (a “Certifying Certificateholder”), the certificate administrator (in its capacity as certificate registrar) will promptly furnish or cause to be furnished to such requesting party a list of the names and addresses of the certificateholders as of the most recent Record Date as they appear in the certificate register, at the expense of the requesting party.
Requests to Communicate
The PSA will require that the certificate administrator include on any Form 10–D any written request received prior to the Distribution Date to which such Form 10-D relates (and on or after the Distribution Date preceding such Distribution Date) from a Certificateholder or Certificate Owner to communicate with other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners related to Certificateholders or Certificate Owners exercising their rights under the terms of the PSA. Any Form 10-D containing such disclosure regarding the request to communicate is required to include the following and no more than the following: (i) the name of the Certificateholder or Certificate Owner making the request, (ii) the date the request was received, (iii) a statement to the effect that the certificate administrator has received such request, stating that such Certificateholder or Certificate Owner is interested in communicating with other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners with regard to the possible exercise of rights under the PSA, and (iv) a description of the method other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners may use to contact the requesting Certificateholder or Certificate Owner.
Any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner wishing to communicate with other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners regarding the exercise of its rights under the terms of the PSA (such party, a “Requesting Investor”) should deliver a written request (a “Communication Request”) signed by an authorized representative of the Requesting Investor to the certificate administrator at the address below:
390
Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration Group – UBS 2018-C8
With
a copy to:
trustadministrationgroup@wellsfargo.com
Any Communication Request must contain the name of the Requesting Investor and the method other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners should use to contact the Requesting Investor, and, if the Requesting Investor is not the registered holder of a class of certificates, then the Communication Request must contain (i) a written certification from the Requesting Investor that it is a beneficial owner of a class of certificates, and (ii) one of the following forms of documentation evidencing its beneficial ownership in such class of certificates: (A) a trade confirmation, (B) an account statement, (C) a medallion stamp guaranteed letter from a broker or dealer stating the Requesting Investor is the beneficial owner, or (D) a document acceptable to the certificate administrator that is similar to any of the documents identified in clauses (A) through (C). The certificate administrator will not be permitted to require any information other than the foregoing in verifying a certificateholder’s or certificate owner’s identity in connection with a Communication Request. Requesting Investors will be responsible for their own expenses in making any Communication Request, but will not be required to bear any expenses of the certificate administrator.
List of Certificateholders
Upon the written request of any Certificateholder, which is required to include a copy of the communication the Certificateholder proposes to transmit, that has provided an Investor Certification, which request is made for purposes of communicating with other holders of certificates of the same series with respect to their rights under the PSA or the certificates, the certificate registrar or other specified person will, within 10 business days after receipt of such request afford such Certificateholder (at such Certificateholder’s sole cost and expense) a current list of Certificateholders. In addition, upon written request to the certificate administrator of any Certificateholder or certificate owner (if applicable) that has provided an Investor Certification, the certificate administrator is required to promptly notify such Certificateholder or certificate owner of the identity of the then-current Directing Certificateholder.
Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements
General
On the Closing Date, the depositor will acquire the Mortgage Loans from each mortgage loan seller pursuant to a separate mortgage loan purchase agreement (each, an “MLPA”), between the related mortgage loan seller and the depositor.
Under the applicable MLPA, the depositor will require each mortgage loan seller to deliver to the certificate administrator, in its capacity as custodian, among other things, generally the following documents (except that the documents with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loans (other than the original promissory note) will be held by the
391
custodian under the related Non-Serviced PSA) with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by the mortgage loan seller (collectively, as to each Mortgage Loan, the “Mortgage File”):
(i) the original Mortgage Note, endorsed on its face or by allonge to the Mortgage Note, without recourse, to the order of the trustee or in blank and further showing a complete, unbroken chain of endorsement from the originator (or, if the original Mortgage Note has been lost, an affidavit to such effect from the related mortgage loan seller or another prior holder, together with a copy of the Mortgage Note and an indemnity properly assigned and endorsed to the trustee);
(ii) the original or a copy of the Mortgage, together with an original or copy of any intervening assignments of the Mortgage, in each case with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified to have been submitted for recording;
(iii) an original assignment of the Mortgage in favor of the trustee or in blank and (subject to the completion of certain missing recording information and, if applicable, the assignee’s name) in recordable form (or, if the related mortgage loan seller is responsible for the recordation of that assignment, a copy thereof certified to be the copy of such assignment submitted or to be submitted for recording);
(iv) the original or a copy of any related assignment of leases and of any intervening assignments (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage), with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified to have been submitted for recording;
(v) an original assignment of any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) in favor of the trustee or in blank and (subject to the completion of certain missing recording information and, if applicable, the assignee’s name) in recordable form (or, if the related mortgage loan seller is responsible for the recordation of that assignment, a copy thereof certified to be the copy of such assignment submitted or to be submitted for recording);
(vi) the original assignment of all unrecorded documents relating to the Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan, if not already assigned pursuant to items (iii) or (v) above;
(vii) originals or copies of all modification, consolidation, assumption, written assurance and substitution agreements in those instances in which the terms or provisions of the Mortgage or Mortgage Note have been modified or the Mortgage Loan has been assumed or consolidated;
(viii) the original or a copy of the policy or certificate of lender’s title insurance (which may be in electronic form) issued in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan, or, if such policy has not been issued or located, an irrevocable, binding commitment (which may be a marked version of the policy that has been executed by an authorized representative of the title company or an agreement to provide the same pursuant to binding escrow instructions executed by an authorized representative of the title company) to issue such title insurance policy;
392
(ix) any filed copies (bearing evidence of filing) or evidence of filing of any Uniform Commercial Code financing statements, related amendments and continuation statements in the possession of the related mortgage loan seller;
(x) an original assignment in favor of the trustee of any financing statement executed and filed in favor of the related mortgage loan seller in the relevant jurisdiction (or, if the related mortgage loan seller is responsible for the filing of that assignment, a copy thereof certified to be the copy of such assignment submitted or to be submitted for recording);
(xi) the original or a copy of any intercreditor agreement relating to existing debt of the borrower, including any Intercreditor Agreement relating to a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xii) the original or copies of any loan agreement, escrow agreement, security agreement or letter of credit (with any necessary transfer documentation) relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xiii) the original or a copy of any ground lease, ground lessor estoppel, environmental indemnity or guaranty relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xiv) the original or a copy of any property management agreement relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xv) with regard to any related Mortgaged Properties that are hotel properties subject to any franchise agreements, comfort letters or similar agreements, the original or a copy of any franchise agreements and comfort letters or similar agreements relating to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and, with respect to any franchise agreement, comfort letter or similar agreement, any assignment of such agreements or any notice to the franchisor of the transfer of a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and/or request for the issuance of a new comfort letter in favor of the trustee, in each case, as applicable;
(xvi) the original or a copy of any lock-box or cash management agreement relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xvii) the original or a copy of any related mezzanine intercreditor agreement;
(xviii) a copy of all related environmental insurance policies; and
(xix) a list related to such Mortgage Loan indicating the related Mortgage Loan documents included in the related Mortgage File as of the Closing Date.
With respect to (A) any Mortgage Loan which is a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan on the Closing Date, the foregoing documents (other than the documents described in clause (i) above) will be delivered to and held by the custodian under the related Non-Serviced PSA on or prior to the Closing Date and (B) any Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, the foregoing documents will be delivered to the custodian on or prior to the Closing Date and such documents (other than the documents described in clause (i) above) will be transferred to the custodian related to the securitization that includes the related Controlling Companion Loan on or about the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date.
In addition, each mortgage loan seller will be required to deliver the Diligence Files for each of its Mortgage Loans to the depositor by uploading such Diligence Files to the
393
designated website, and the depositor will deliver to the certificate administrator an electronic copy of such Diligence Files to be posted to the secure data room.
“Diligence File” means with respect to each Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, if applicable, generally the following documents in electronic format:
(a) A copy of each of the following documents:
(i) the Mortgage Note, endorsed on its face or by allonge attached to the Mortgage Note, without recourse, to the order of the trustee or in blank and further showing a complete, unbroken chain of endorsement from the originator (or, if the original Mortgage Note has been lost, an affidavit to such effect from the applicable mortgage loan seller or another prior holder, together with a copy of the Mortgage Note and an indemnity properly assigned and endorsed to the trustee);
(ii) the Mortgage, together with a copy of any intervening assignments of the Mortgage, in each case with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified to have been submitted for recording (if in the possession of the applicable mortgage loan seller);
(iii) any related assignment of leases and of any intervening assignments (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage), in each case with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified to have been submitted for recording (if in the possession of the applicable mortgage loan seller);
(iv) all modification, consolidation, assumption, written assurance and substitution agreements in those instances in which the terms or provisions of the Mortgage or Mortgage Note have been modified or the Mortgage Loan has been assumed or consolidated;
(v) the policy or certificate of lender’s title insurance issued in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan, or, if such policy has not been issued or located, an irrevocable, binding commitment (which may be a marked version of the policy that has been executed by an authorized representative of the title company or an agreement to provide the same pursuant to binding escrow instructions executed by an authorized representative of the title company) to issue such title insurance policy;
(vi) any UCC financing statements, related amendments and continuation statements in the possession of the applicable mortgage loan seller;
(vii) any intercreditor agreement relating to permitted debt of the mortgagor, including any intercreditor agreement relating to a Serviced Whole Loan, and any related mezzanine intercreditor agreement;
(viii) any loan agreement, escrow agreement, security agreement or letter of credit relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(ix) any ground lease, related ground lessor estoppel, indemnity or guaranty relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
394
(x) any property management agreement relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xi) any franchise agreements and comfort letters or similar agreements relating to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and, with respect to any franchise agreement, comfort letter or similar agreement, any assignment of such agreements or any notice to the franchisor of the transfer of a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan;
(xii) any lock-box or cash management agreement relating to a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan;
(xiii) all related environmental reports; and
(xiv) all related environmental insurance policies;
(b) a copy of any engineering reports or property condition reports;
(c) other than with respect to a hotel property (except with respect to tenanted commercial space within a hotel property), copies of a rent roll;
(d) for any office, retail, industrial or warehouse property, a copy of all leases and estoppels and subordination and non-disturbance agreements delivered to the related mortgage loan seller;
(e) a copy of all legal opinions (excluding attorney-client communications between the related mortgage loan seller, and its counsel that are privileged communications or constitute legal or other due diligence analyses), if any, delivered in connection with the closing of the related Mortgage Loan;
(f) a copy of all mortgagor’s certificates of hazard insurance and/or hazard insurance policies or other applicable insurance policies (to the extent not previously included as part of this definition), if any, delivered in connection with the closing of the related Mortgage Loan;
(g) a copy of the appraisal for the related Mortgaged Property(ies);
(h) for any Mortgage Loan that the related Mortgaged Property(ies) is leased to a single tenant, a copy of the lease;
(i) a copy of the applicable mortgage loan seller’s asset summary;
(j) a copy of all surveys for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties;
(k) a copy of all zoning reports;
(l) a copy of financial statements of the related mortgagor;
(m) a copy of operating statements for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties;
(n) a copy of all UCC searches;
395
(o) a copy of all litigation searches;
(p) a copy of all bankruptcy searches;
(q) a copy of any origination settlement statement;
(r) a copy of the insurance summary report;
(s) a copy of organizational documents of the related mortgagor and any guarantor;
(t) unless already included in the origination settlement statement, a copy of all escrow statements related to the escrow account balances as of the Mortgage Loan origination date;
(u) a copy of all related environmental reports that were received by the applicable mortgage loan seller;
(v) unless already included in the environmental reports, a copy of any closure letter (environmental); and
(w) a copy of any environmental remediation agreement for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties;
in each case, to the extent that the originator received such documents in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan. In the event any of the items identified above were not included in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan (other than documents that would not be included in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan because such document is inapplicable to the origination of a Mortgage Loan of that structure or type), the Diligence File will be required to include a statement to that effect. No information that is proprietary to the related originator or mortgage loan seller or any draft documents or privileged or internal communications or credit underwriting analysis will constitute part of the Diligence File. It is generally not required to include any of the same items identified above again if such items have already been included under another clause of the definition of Diligence File, and the Diligence File will be required to include a statement to that effect. The mortgage loan seller may, without any obligation to do so, include such other documents as part of the Diligence File that such mortgage loan seller believes should be included to enable the asset representations reviewer to perform the Asset Review on such Mortgage Loan; provided that such documents are clearly labeled and identified.
Each MLPA will contain certain representations and warranties of the applicable mortgage loan seller with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by that mortgage loan seller. Those representations and warranties are set forth in Annex D-1 and will be made as of the date set forth in the related MLPA, subject to certain exceptions to such representations and warranties as set forth in Annex D-2.
If any of the documents required to be included in the Mortgage File for any Mortgage Loan is missing from the Mortgage File or defective or if there is a breach of a representation or warranty relating to any Mortgage Loan, and, in either case, such omission, defect or breach materially and adversely affects the value of the related Mortgage Loan, the value of the related Mortgaged Property or the interests of any Certificateholders in the Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property or causes the Mortgage Loan
396
to be other than a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective obligation to be treated as a “qualified mortgage” (a “Material Defect”), the applicable mortgage loan seller will be required to, no later than 90 days following:
(i) such mortgage loan seller’s receipt of notice of the Material Defect from any party to the PSA (a “Breach Notice”) or, if earlier, such mortgage loan seller’s discovery of a Material Defect, except in the case of the following clause (ii); or
(ii) in the case of such Material Defect that would cause the Mortgage Loan not to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective obligation to be treated as a qualified mortgage, the earlier of
(x) discovery by the related mortgage loan seller or any party to the PSA of such Material Defect, or
(y) receipt of a Breach Notice by the mortgage loan seller,
(A) cure such Material Defect in all material respects, at its own expense,
(B) repurchase the affected Mortgage Loan or REO Loan at the Purchase Price, or
(C) substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to any Whole Loans, as applicable, for which no substitution will be permitted) for such affected Mortgage Loan or REO Loan, and pay a shortfall amount in connection with such substitution;
provided that no such substitution may occur on or after the second anniversary of the Closing Date; provided, however, that the applicable mortgage loan seller will generally have an additional 90-day period to cure such Material Defect (or, failing such cure, to repurchase the affected Mortgage Loan or REO Loan or, if applicable, substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan (other than with respect to any related Whole Loan, for which no substitution will be permitted), if it is diligently proceeding toward that cure, and has delivered to the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator (who will promptly deliver a copy of such officer’s certificate to the 17g-5 Information Provider), the trustee, the operating advisor and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder, an officer’s certificate that describes the reasons that a cure was not effected within the initial 90-day period; provided that if any such Material Defect is not cured after the initial cure period and any such extended cure period solely due to the failure of the mortgage loan seller to have received the recorded document, then the mortgage loan seller will be entitled to continue to defer its cure, repurchase and/or substitution obligations in respect of such Material Defect until eighteen (18) months after the closing date so long as the mortgage loan seller certifies to the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer and the certificate administrator no less than every ninety (90) days thereafter that the Material Defect is still in effect solely because of its failure to have received the recorded document and that the mortgage loan seller is diligently pursuing the cure of such Material Defect (specifying the actions being taken). Notwithstanding the foregoing, there will be no such 90-day extension if such Material Defect would cause the related Mortgage Loan not to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective Mortgage Loan to be treated as a qualified mortgage.
397
A delay in either the discovery of a Material Defect or in providing notice of such Material Defect will relieve the applicable mortgage loan seller of its obligation to cure, repurchase or substitute for (or make a Loss of Value Payment with respect to) the related Mortgage Loan if (i) the mortgage loan seller did not otherwise discover or have knowledge of such Material Defect, (ii) such delay is the result of the failure by a party to the PSA to promptly provide a notice of such Material Defect as required by the terms of the MLPA or the PSA after such party has actual knowledge of such defect or breach (knowledge will not be deemed to exist by reason of the custodian’s exception report or possession of the Mortgage File), (iii) such delay precludes the mortgage loan seller from curing such Material Defect and (iv) such Material Defect does not relate to the applicable mortgage loan not being a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective obligation to be treated as a qualified mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Mortgage Loan is not secured by a Mortgaged Property that is, in whole or in part, a hotel, restaurant (operated by a borrower), healthcare facility, nursing home, assisted living facility, self storage facility, theater or fitness center (operated by a borrower), then the failure to deliver copies of the UCC financing statements with respect to such Mortgage Loan will not be a Material Defect.
If there is a Material Defect with respect to one or more Mortgaged Properties with respect to a Mortgage Loan, the applicable mortgage loan seller will not be obligated to repurchase the Mortgage Loan if (i) the affected Mortgaged Property may be released pursuant to the terms of any partial release provisions in the related Mortgage Loan documents (and such Mortgaged Property is, in fact, released), (ii) the remaining Mortgaged Property(ies) satisfy the requirements, if any, set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents and the applicable mortgage loan seller provides an opinion of counsel to the effect that such release in lieu of repurchase would not (A) cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust or (B) result in the imposition of a tax upon any Trust REMIC, the Grantor Trust or the issuing entity and (iii) each applicable Rating Agency has provided a Rating Agency Confirmation.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of a mortgage loan seller repurchasing, substituting or curing such Material Defect, to the extent that the mortgage loan seller and the special servicer (for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and in respect of any Mortgage Loan that is not an Excluded Loan, with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder) are able to agree upon a cash payment payable by the mortgage loan seller to the issuing entity that would be deemed sufficient to compensate the issuing entity for such Material Defect (a “Loss of Value Payment”), the mortgage loan seller may elect, in its sole discretion, to pay such Loss of Value Payment. The special servicer will determine the amount of any applicable Loss of Value Payment (with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder in respect of any Mortgage Loan that is not an Excluded Loan and for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) and, in the case of any PSA Party Repurchase Request with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans prior to the occurrence of a Resolution Failure, will communicate such amount to the master servicer for its enforcement action with the mortgage loan seller. In connection with any such determination with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will promptly provide the special servicer, but in any event within the time frame and in the manner provided in the PSA, with the servicing file and all information, documents and records (including records stored electronically on computer tapes, magnetic discs and the like) relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan and, if applicable, any related Serviced Companion Loan, either in the master servicer’s possession or otherwise reasonably available to the master servicer without undue burden or expense, and reasonably requested by the special servicer to the extent set forth in the PSA in order to permit the special servicer to calculate the Loss of Value Payment as set forth in the PSA.
398
Upon its making such payment, the mortgage loan seller will be deemed to have cured such Material Defect in all respects. A Loss of Value Payment may not be made with respect to any such Material Defect that would cause the applicable Mortgage Loan not to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), but without regard to the rule of Treasury regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that causes a defective Mortgage Loan to be treated as a qualified mortgage.
With respect to the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan, each of Société Générale and UBS AG, New York Branch will be responsible for any remedies solely in respect of the note sold by it as if each note evidencing the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan was a separate Mortgage Loan. With respect to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan, each of CCRE Lending and UBS AG, New York Branch will be responsible for any remedies solely in respect of the note sold by it as if each note evidencing the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan was a separate Mortgage Loan.
With respect to any Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Loan), the “Purchase Price” is equal to the sum of (1) the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan (or related REO Loan (including for such purpose, to the extent required pursuant ot the succeeding paragraph, the related Companion Loan, if applicable)), as of the date of purchase, (2) all accrued and unpaid interest on the Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Loan (including for such purpose, to the extent required pursuant to the succeeding paragraph, the related Companion Loan, if applicable)) at the related Mortgage Rate in effect from time to time (excluding any portion of such interest that represents default interest or Excess Interest on an ARD Loan), to, but not including, the due date immediately preceding or coinciding with the Determination Date for the Collection Period of purchase, (3) all related unreimbursed Servicing Advances plus accrued and unpaid interest on all related Advances at the Reimbursement Rate, Special Servicing Fees (whether paid or unpaid) and any other additional trust fund expenses (except for Liquidation Fees) in respect of such Mortgage Loan or related REO Loan (including for such purpose, to the extent required pursuant to the succeeding paragraph, the related Companion Loan, if any), (4) solely in the case of a repurchase or substitution by a mortgage loan seller, all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses reasonably incurred or to be incurred by the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator or the trustee in respect of the omission, breach or defect giving rise to the repurchase or substitution obligation, including any expenses arising out of the enforcement of the repurchase or substitution obligation (or, in the case of LCF, enforcement of the payment guarantee obligations of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP pursuant to the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement to which LCF is a party), including, without limitation, legal fees and expenses and any additional trust fund expenses relating to such Mortgage Loan or related REO Loan; provided, however, that such out-of-pocket expenses will not include expenses incurred by investors in instituting an Asset Review Vote Election, in taking part in an Affirmative Asset Review Vote or in utilizing the dispute resolution provisions described below under “—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, (5) Liquidation Fees, if any, payable with respect to the affected Mortgage Loan or related REO Loan (including for such purpose, to the extent required pursuant to the succeeding paragraph, the related Companion Loan, if any) (which will not include any Liquidation Fees if such affected Mortgage Loan is repurchased prior to the expiration of the additional 90-day period immediately following the initial 90-day period) and (6) solely in the case of a repurchase or substitution by the related mortgage loan seller, any Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee for such Mortgage Loan, to the extent not previously paid by the related mortgage loan seller.
399
Solely with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan to be sold as a Defaulted Loan, “Purchase Price” will mean the amount calculated in accordance with the preceding paragraph in respect of the related Whole Loan, including, for such purposes, the Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loan, as applicable. With respect to any REO Property to be sold by the Special Servicer for the Purchase Price in accordance with the PSA, “Purchase Price” will mean the amount calculated in accordance with the preceding paragraph in respect of the related REO Loan (including any related Companion Loan). With respect to any sale to any related Companion Holder or mezzanine lender, the “Purchase Price” will be allocated between the related Mortgage Loan and Companion Loan, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions of the related Intercreditor Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any repurchase pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the termination of the Trust, the “Purchase Price” will not include any amounts payable in respect of any related Companion Loan.
A “Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan” is a substitute mortgage loan (other than with respect to any Whole Loan, for which no substitution will be permitted) replacing a removed Mortgage Loan that must, on the date of substitution:
(a) have an outstanding principal balance, after application of all scheduled payments of principal and interest due during or prior to the month of substitution, whether or not received, not in excess of the Stated Principal Balance of the removed Mortgage Loan as of the due date in the calendar month during which the substitution occurs;
(b) have a fixed Mortgage Rate not less than the Mortgage Rate of the removed Mortgage Loan (determined without regard to any prior modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of the removed Mortgage Loan);
(c) have the same due date and a grace period no longer than that of the removed Mortgage Loan;
(d) accrue interest on the same basis as the removed Mortgage Loan (for example, on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months);
(e) have a remaining term to stated maturity not greater than, and not more than five years less than, the remaining term to stated maturity of the removed Mortgage Loan;
(f) have a then-current loan-to-value ratio equal to or less than the lesser of (i) the loan-to-value ratio for the removed Mortgage Loan as of the Closing Date and (ii) 75%, in each case using a “value” for the Mortgaged Property as determined using an appraisal conducted by a member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) prepared in accordance with the requirements of the FIRREA;
(g) comply as of the date of substitution in all material respects with all of the representations and warranties set forth in the related MLPA;
(h) have an environmental report that indicates no material adverse environmental conditions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property and that will be delivered as a part of the related Mortgage File;
(i) have a then-current debt service coverage ratio at least equal to the greater of (i) the original debt service coverage ratio of the removed Mortgage Loan as of the Closing Date and (ii) 1.25x;
400
(j) constitute a “qualified replacement mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(4) as evidenced by an opinion of counsel (provided at the related mortgage loan seller’s expense);
(k) not have a maturity date or an amortization period that extends to a date that is after the date five years prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date;
(l) have comparable prepayment restrictions to those of the removed Mortgage Loan;
(m) not be substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan unless the trustee and the certificate administrator have received a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies (the cost, if any, of obtaining such Rating Agency Confirmation to be paid by the related mortgage loan seller);
(n) have been approved, so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and the affected Mortgage Loan is not an Excluded Loan, by the Directing Certificateholder;
(o) prohibit defeasance within two years of the Closing Date;
(p) not be substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan if it would result in the termination of the REMIC status of any Trust REMIC or the grantor trust status of the Grantor Trust or the imposition of tax on the Trust, Grantor Trust or any Trust REMIC other than a tax on income expressly permitted or contemplated to be imposed by the terms of the PSA, as determined by an opinion of counsel at the cost of the related mortgage loan seller;
(q) have an engineering report that indicates no material adverse property condition or deferred maintenance with respect to the related Mortgaged Property that will be delivered as a part of the related servicing file; and
(r) be current in the payment of all scheduled payments of principal and interest then due.
In the event that more than one Mortgage Loan is substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan or Mortgage Loans, then (x) the amounts described in clause (a) are required to be determined on the basis of aggregate principal balances and (y) each such proposed Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan must individually satisfy each of the requirements specified in clauses (b) through (r) of the preceding sentence, except (z) the rates described in clause (b) above and the remaining term to stated maturity referred to in clause (e) above are required to be determined on a weighted average basis, provided that no individual Mortgage Rate (net of the Servicing Fee Rate, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate and the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate) may be lower than the highest fixed Pass-Through Rate (not based on or subject to a cap equal to or based on the WAC Rate) of any class of Principal Balance Certificates having a principal balance then-outstanding. When a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan is substituted for a removed Mortgage Loan, the applicable mortgage loan seller will be required to certify that the Mortgage Loan meets all of the requirements of the above definition and send the certification to the trustee the certificate administrator and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder.
The foregoing repurchase or substitution obligation or, if the applicable mortgage loan seller elects to make a Loss of Value Payment, the obligation to pay the Loss of Value
401
Payment will constitute the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders and the trustee under the PSA for any uncured breach of any mortgage loan seller’s representations and warranties regarding the Mortgage Loans or any uncured document defect; provided that with respect to the obligations of LCF, pursuant to the related MLPA, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP will agree to guarantee payment in connection with the performance of such obligations; provided, further, that if any breach pertains to a representation or warranty that the related Mortgage Loan documents or any particular Mortgage Loan document requires the related borrower to bear the costs and expenses associated with any particular action or matter under such Mortgage Loan document(s), then the applicable mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of LCF, any of that mortgage loan seller, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP) may cure such breach within the applicable cure period (as the same may be extended) by reimbursing the issuing entity (by wire transfer of immediately available funds) for (i) the reasonable amount of any such costs and expenses incurred by the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee or the issuing entity that are incurred as a result of such breach and have not been reimbursed by the related borrower and (ii) the amount of any fees of the asset representations reviewer attributable to the Asset Review of such Mortgage Loan; provided, further, that in the event any such costs and expenses exceed $10,000, the applicable mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of mortgage loans sold by LCF, each of that mortgage loan seller, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP) will have the option to either repurchase or substitute for the related Mortgage Loan as provided above or pay such costs and expenses. The applicable mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of LCF, that mortgage loan seller, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and/or Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP) will remit the amount of these costs and expenses and upon its making such remittance, the applicable mortgage loan seller (or other applicable party) will be deemed to have cured the breach in all respects. The applicable mortgage loan seller will be the sole warranting party in respect of the Mortgage Loans sold by that mortgage loan seller to the depositor, and (subject to the discussion above regarding LCF) none of its affiliates and no other person will be obligated to repurchase or replace any affected Mortgage Loan or make a Loss of Value Payment in connection with a breach of any representation and warranty or in connection with a document defect if the applicable mortgage loan seller defaults on its obligation to do so.
Dispute Resolution Provisions
The mortgage loan seller will be subject to the dispute resolution provisions described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Dispute Resolution Provisions” to the extent those provisions are triggered with respect to any mortgage loan sold to the depositor by the mortgage loan seller and will be obligated under the related MLPA to comply with all applicable provisions and to take part in any mediation or arbitration proceedings that may result.
Asset Review Obligations
The mortgage loan seller will be obligated to perform its obligations described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—The Asset Representations Reviewer—Asset Review” relating to any Asset Reviews performed by the asset representations reviewer, and the mortgage loan seller will have the rights described under that heading.
402
Pooling and Servicing Agreement
General
The servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Serviced Companion Loan and any related REO Properties (including any interest of the holder of any Companion Loan in the REO Property acquired with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan) will be governed by the PSA and any related Intercreditor Agreement.
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Companion Loans and any related REO Properties (including the issuing entity’s interest in REO Property acquired with respect to a Non-Serviced Whole Loan) will be serviced by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA in accordance with such Non-Serviced PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement. Unless otherwise specifically stated and except where the context otherwise indicates (such as with respect to P&I Advances), discussions in this section or in any other section of this prospectus regarding the servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans should be deemed to include the servicing and administration of the related Serviced Companion Loans but not to include any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, any Non-Serviced Companion Loan and any related REO Property.
The following summaries describe certain provisions of the PSA relating to the servicing and administration of the Mortgage Loans (excluding each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Companion Loan and any related REO Properties. In the case of any Serviced Whole Loan, certain provisions of the related Intercreditor Agreement are described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Whole Loans”.
Certain provisions of each Non-Serviced PSA relating to the servicing and administration of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Companion Loans, the related REO Properties and the related Intercreditor Agreement are summarized under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below.
As to particular servicing matters, the discussion under this heading “Pooling and Servicing Agreement” is applicable to the Servicing Shift Whole Loans only while the PSA governs the servicing of the related Servicing Shift Whole Loan. As described in “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—The Servicing of the Servicing Shift Whole Loans Will Shift to Other Servicers”, on and after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the Servicing Shift PSA, and the provisions of such Servicing Shift PSA may be different than the terms of the PSA, although such Servicing Shift Whole Loan will still need to be serviced in compliance with the requirements of the related Intercreditor Agreement, as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans”.
The PSA does not include an obligation for any party of the PSA to advise a Certificateholder with respect to its rights and protections relative to the trust.
Assignment of the Mortgage Loans
The depositor will purchase the Mortgage Loans to be included in the issuing entity on or before the Closing Date from each of the mortgage loan sellers pursuant to separate MLPAs.
403
See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers” and “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
On the Closing Date, the depositor will sell, transfer or otherwise convey, assign or cause the assignment of the Mortgage Loans, without recourse, together with the depositor’s rights and remedies against the mortgage loan sellers under the MLPAs, to the trustee for the benefit of the holders of the certificates. On or prior to the Closing Date, the depositor will require each mortgage loan seller to deliver to the certificate administrator, in its capacity as custodian, the Mortgage Notes and certain other documents and instruments with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan. The custodian will hold such documents in the name of the issuing entity for the benefit of the holders of the certificates. The custodian is obligated to review certain documents for each Mortgage Loan within 60 days of the Closing Date and report any missing documents or certain types of document defects to the parties to the PSA, the Directing Certificateholder (for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than in respect of an Excluded Loan) and the related mortgage loan seller.
In addition, pursuant to the related MLPA, each mortgage loan seller will be required to deliver the Diligence File for each of its Mortgage Loans to the depositor by uploading such Diligence File to the designated website within 60 days following the Closing Date, and the depositor will deliver to the certificate administrator an electronic copy of such Diligence Files to be posted to the secure data room.
Pursuant to the PSA, the depositor will assign to the trustee for the benefit of Certificateholders the representations and warranties made by the mortgage loan sellers to the depositor in the MLPAs and any rights and remedies that the depositor has against the mortgage loan sellers under the MLPAs with respect to any Material Defect. See “—Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA” below and “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements”.
Servicing Standard
The master servicer and the special servicer will be required to diligently service and administer the Mortgage Loans (excluding each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan and the related REO Properties (other than any REO Property related to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) for which it is responsible in accordance with applicable law, the terms of the PSA, the Mortgage Loan documents, and the related Intercreditor Agreements and, to the extent consistent with the foregoing, in accordance with the higher of the following standards of care: (1) the same manner in which, and with the same care, skill, prudence and diligence with which the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, services and administers similar mortgage loans for other third-party portfolios, and (2) the same care, skill, prudence and diligence with which the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, services and administers similar mortgage loans owned by the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, with a view to: (A) the timely recovery of all payments of principal and interest under the Mortgage Loans or any Serviced Whole Loan or (B) in the case of a Specially Serviced Loan or an REO Property, the maximization of recovery of principal and interest on a net present value basis on the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan, and the best interests of the issuing entity and the Certificateholders (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders constituted a single lender) (and, in the case of any Whole Loan, the best interests of the issuing entity, the Certificateholders and the holder of the related Companion Loan (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and the holder or holders of the related Companion Loan constituted a single lender), taking into account the
404
subordinate or pari passu nature of the related Companion Loan), as determined by the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, in its reasonable judgment, in either case giving due consideration to the customary and usual standards of practice of prudent, institutional commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing community mortgage loan servicers, but without regard to any conflict of interest arising from:
(A) any relationship that the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of their respective affiliates, may have with any of the underlying borrowers, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, any party to the PSA or any affiliate of the foregoing;
(B) the ownership of any certificate (or any interest in any Companion Loan, mezzanine loan or subordinate debt relating to a Mortgage Loan) by the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of their respective affiliates;
(C) the obligation, if any, of the master servicer to make advances;
(D) the right of the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates to receive compensation or reimbursement of costs under the PSA generally or with respect to any particular transaction;
(E) the ownership, servicing or management for others of (i) a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and a Non-Serviced Companion Loan or (ii) any other mortgage loans, subordinate debt, mezzanine loans or properties not covered by the PSA or held by the issuing entity by the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates;
(F) any debt that the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates, has extended to any underlying borrower or an affiliate of any borrower (including, without limitation, any mezzanine financing);
(G) any option to purchase any Mortgage Loan or the related Companion Loan the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates, may have; and
(H) any obligation of the master servicer or the special servicer, or any of their respective affiliates, to repurchase or substitute for a Mortgage Loan as a mortgage loan seller (if the master servicer or the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates is a mortgage loan seller) (the foregoing, collectively referred to as the “Servicing Standard”).
All net present value calculations and determinations made under the PSA with respect to any Mortgage Loan, Mortgaged Property or REO Property (including for purposes of the definition of “Servicing Standard” set forth above) will be made in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents or, in the event the Mortgage Loan documents are silent, by using a discount rate (i) for principal and interest payments on the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan or sale by the special servicer of a Defaulted Loan, the highest of (1) the rate determined by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, that approximates the market rate that would be obtainable by the related borrower on similar non-defaulted debt of such borrower as of such date of determination, (2) the Mortgage Rate and (3) the yield on 10-year U.S. treasuries as of such date of determination and (ii) for all other cash flows, including property cash flow, the “discount rate” set forth in the most recent appraisal (or updated appraisal) of the related Mortgaged Property.
405
In the case of each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the master servicer and the special servicer will be required to act in accordance with the Servicing Standard with respect to any action required to be taken regarding such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan pursuant to their respective obligations under the PSA.
Subservicing
The master servicer and the special servicer may delegate and/or assign some or all of its respective servicing obligations and duties with respect to some or all of the Mortgage Loans and any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan for which it is responsible to one or more third-party sub-servicers, provided that the master servicer and the special servicer, as applicable, will remain obligated under the PSA. A sub-servicer may be an affiliate of the depositor, the master servicer or the special servicer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special servicer may not enter into any sub-servicing agreement that provides for the performance by third parties of any or all of its obligations under the PSA without, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event and other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan, the consent of the Directing Certificateholder, except to the extent necessary for the special servicer to comply with applicable regulatory requirements.
Each sub-servicing agreement between the master servicer or special servicer and a sub-servicer (a “Sub-Servicing Agreement”) will generally be required to provide that (i) if for any reason the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, is no longer acting in that capacity (including, without limitation, by reason of a Servicer Termination Event), the trustee or any successor master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, may, except with respect to certain initial Sub-Servicing Agreements, assume or terminate such party’s rights and obligations under such Sub-Servicing Agreement and (ii) the sub-servicer will be in default under such Sub-Servicing Agreement and such Sub-Servicing Agreement will be terminated (following the expiration of any applicable grace period) if the sub-servicer fails (A) to deliver by the due date any Exchange Act reporting items required to be delivered to the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the depositor pursuant to the PSA or such Sub-Servicing Agreement or to the master servicer under any other pooling and servicing agreement that the depositor is a party to, or (B) to perform in any material respect any of its covenants or obligations contained in such Sub-Servicing Agreement regarding creating, obtaining or delivering any Exchange Act reporting items required in order for any party to the PSA to perform its obligations under the PSA or under the Exchange Act reporting requirements of any other pooling and servicing agreement to which the depositor is a party. The master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will be required to monitor the performance of sub-servicers retained by it and will have the right to remove a sub-servicer retained by it pursuant to the terms of the related Sub-Servicing Agreement. However, no sub-servicer will be permitted under any Sub-Servicing Agreement to make material servicing decisions, such as loan modifications or determinations as to the manner or timing of enforcing remedies under the Mortgage Loan documents, without the consent of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable. The master servicer’s consent may also be required for certain other servicing decisions as provided in the related Sub-Servicing Agreement.
Generally, the master servicer will be solely liable for all fees owed by it to any sub-servicer retained by the master servicer, without regard to whether the master servicer’s compensation pursuant to the PSA is sufficient to pay those fees. Each sub-servicer will be required to be reimbursed by the master servicer for certain expenditures which such sub-servicer makes, only to the same extent the master servicer is reimbursed under the PSA.
406
Advances
P&I Advances
On the business day immediately preceding each Distribution Date (the “P&I Advance Date”), except as otherwise described below, the master servicer will be obligated, unless determined to be nonrecoverable as described below, to make advances (each, a “P&I Advance”) out of its own funds or, subject to the replacement of those funds as provided in the PSA, certain funds held in the Collection Account that are not required to be part of the Available Funds for that Distribution Date, in an amount equal to (but subject to reduction as described below) the aggregate of:
(1) all Periodic Payments (other than balloon payments) (net of any applicable Servicing Fees) that were due on the Mortgage Loans (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any REO Loan (other than any portion of an REO Loan related to a Companion Loan) during the related Collection Period and not received as of the business day preceding the P&I Advance Date; and
(2) in the case of each Mortgage Loan that is delinquent in respect of its balloon payment as of the P&I Advance Date (including any REO Loan (other than any portion of an REO Loan related to a Companion Loan) as to which the balloon payment would have been past due), an amount equal to its Assumed Scheduled Payment.
The master servicer’s obligations to make P&I Advances in respect of any Mortgage Loan (including any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or REO Loan (other than any portion of an REO Loan related to a Companion Loan) will continue, except if a determination as to non-recoverability is made, through and up to liquidation of the Mortgage Loan or disposition of the REO Property, as the case may be. To the extent that the master servicer fails to make a P&I Advance that it is required to make under the PSA, the trustee will be required to make the required P&I Advance in accordance with the terms of the PSA.
If an Appraisal Reduction Amount has been determined with respect to any Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of a Non-Serviced Whole Loan, an appraisal reduction has been made in accordance with the related Non-Serviced PSA and the master servicer has notice of such appraisal reduction amount) and such Mortgage Loan experiences subsequent delinquencies, then the interest portion of any P&I Advance in respect of that Mortgage Loan for the related Distribution Date will be reduced (there will be no reduction in the principal portion, if any, of such P&I Advance) to equal the product of (x) the amount of the interest portion of the P&I Advance for that Mortgage Loan for the related Distribution Date without regard to this sentence, and (y) a fraction, expressed as a percentage, the numerator of which is equal to the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan immediately prior to the related Distribution Date, net of the related Appraisal Reduction Amount (or, in the case of any Whole Loan, the portion of such Appraisal Reduction Amount allocated to the related Mortgage Loan), if any, and the denominator of which is equal to the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan immediately prior to the related Distribution Date.
Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be required to make a P&I Advance for a balloon payment, default interest, late payment charges, Yield Maintenance Charges or Prepayment Premiums, Excess Interest or with respect to any Companion Loan.
407
Servicing Advances
In addition to P&I Advances, except as otherwise described under “—Recovery of Advances” below and except in certain limited circumstances described below, the master servicer will also be obligated (subject to the limitations described in this prospectus), to make advances (“Servicing Advances” and, collectively with P&I Advances, “Advances”) in connection with the servicing and administration of any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Companion Loan, as applicable, in respect of which a default, delinquency or other unanticipated event has occurred or is reasonably foreseeable, or, in connection with the servicing and administration of any Mortgaged Property securing such Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or REO Property (other than REO Property related to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), in order to pay delinquent real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums and to cover other similar costs and expenses necessary to preserve the priority of or enforce the related Mortgage Loan documents or to protect, lease, manage and maintain the related Mortgaged Property. To the extent that the master servicer fails to make a Servicing Advance that it is required to make under the PSA and the trustee has received notice or otherwise has actual knowledge of this failure, the trustee will be required to make the required Servicing Advance in accordance with the terms of the PSA.
However, none of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will make any Servicing Advance in connection with the exercise of any cure rights or purchase rights granted to the holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan under the related Intercreditor Agreement or the PSA.
The special servicer will have no obligation to make any Servicing Advances. However, in an urgent or emergency situation requiring the making of a Servicing Advance, the special servicer may make such Servicing Advance, and the master servicer will be required to reimburse the special servicer for such Advance (with interest on that Advance) within a specified number of days as set forth in the PSA, unless such Advance is determined to be nonrecoverable by the master servicer in its reasonable judgment (in which case it will be reimbursed out of the Collection Account). Once the special servicer is reimbursed, the master servicer will be deemed to have made the special servicer’s Servicing Advance as of the date made by the special servicer, and will be entitled to reimbursement with interest on that Advance in accordance with the terms of the PSA.
No Servicing Advances will be made with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan if the related Mortgage Loan is no longer held by the issuing entity or if such Serviced Whole Loan is no longer serviced under the PSA and no Servicing Advances will be made for any Non-Serviced Whole Loans under the PSA. Any requirement of the master servicer or the trustee to make an Advance in the PSA is intended solely to provide liquidity for the benefit of the Certificateholders and not as credit support or otherwise to impose on any such person the risk of loss with respect to one or more Mortgage Loans or the related Companion Loan.
The master servicer will also be obligated to make Servicing Advances with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan. With respect to a Non-Serviced Whole Loan, the applicable servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA will be obligated to make property protection advances with respect to such Non-Serviced Whole Loan. See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
408
Nonrecoverable Advances
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee will be obligated to make any Advance that the master servicer or the special servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, or the trustee, in its good faith business judgment, determines would, if made, not be recoverable (including recovery of interest on the Advance) out of Related Proceeds (a “Nonrecoverable Advance”). In addition, the special servicer may, at its option make a determination in accordance with the Servicing Standard that any P&I Advance or Servicing Advance, if made, would be a Nonrecoverable Advance, and if it makes such a determination, must deliver to the master servicer (and, with respect to a Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan, to the master servicer or special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement governing any securitization trust into which any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan is deposited, and, with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and Non-Serviced Special Servicer), the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and the 17g-5 Information Provider notice of such determination, which determination will be conclusive and binding on the master servicer and the trustee. The special servicer will have no such obligation to make an affirmative determination that any P&I Advance or Servicing Advance is, or would be, recoverable, and in the absence of a determination by the special servicer that such an Advance is non-recoverable, each such decision will remain with the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable. If the special servicer makes a determination that only a portion, and not all, of any previously made or proposed P&I Advance or Servicing Advance is non-recoverable, the master servicer and the trustee will have the right to make its own subsequent determination that any remaining portion of any such previously made or proposed P&I Advance or Servicing Advance is non-recoverable.
In making such non-recoverability determination, each person will be entitled to consider (among other things): (a) (i) the obligations of the borrower under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, as it may have been modified, and (ii) the related Mortgaged Properties in their “as-is” or then-current conditions and occupancies, as modified by such party’s assumptions regarding the possibility and effects of future adverse change with respect to such Mortgaged Properties, (b) estimated future expenses, (c) estimated timing of recoveries, and (d) the existence of any Nonrecoverable Advances which, at the time of such consideration, the recovery of which are being deferred or delayed by the master servicer or the trustee because there is insufficient principal available for such recovery, in light of the fact that Related Proceeds are a source of recovery not only for the Advance under consideration but also a potential source of recovery for such delayed or deferred Advance. In addition, any such person may update or change its recoverability determinations (but not reverse any other person’s determination that an Advance is non-recoverable) at any time and may obtain at the expense of the issuing entity any reasonably required analysis, appraisals or market value estimates or other information for such purposes. Absent bad faith, any non-recoverability determination described in this paragraph will be conclusive and binding on the Certificateholders, and may be conclusively relied upon by, but (other than a non-recoverability determination by the special servicer) is not binding upon, the master servicer and the trustee. The master servicer and the trustee will be entitled to rely conclusively on and will be bound by any non-recoverability determination of the special servicer. Nonrecoverable Advances will represent a portion of the losses to be borne by the Certificateholders.
With respect to a Non-Serviced Whole Loan, if any servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA determines that a principal and interest advance with respect to the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan, if made, would be non-recoverable, such
409
determination will not be binding on the master servicer and the trustee as it relates to any proposed P&I Advance with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan; provided, however, that the master servicer and the trustee may rely on the non-recoverability determination of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Trustee under the related Non-Serviced PSA. Similarly, with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, if the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, determines that any P&I Advance with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, if made, would be non-recoverable, such determination will not be binding on the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer, related Non-Serviced Special Servicer and related Non-Serviced Trustee as such determination relates to any proposed P&I Advance with respect to the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan (unless the related Non-Serviced PSA provides otherwise).
Recovery of Advances
The master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to recover (a) any Servicing Advance made out of its own funds from any amounts collected in respect of a Mortgage Loan (or, consistent with the related Intercreditor Agreement, a Serviced Whole Loan) as to which such Servicing Advance was made, and (b) any P&I Advance made out of its own funds from any amounts collected in respect of the Mortgage Loan as to which such P&I Advance was made, whether in the form of late payments, insurance and condemnation proceeds, liquidation proceeds or otherwise from the related Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property (“Related Proceeds”). Each of the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will be entitled to recover any Advance by it that it subsequently determines to be a Nonrecoverable Advance out of general collections on or relating to the Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account (first from principal collections and then from any other collections). Amounts payable in respect of any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan pursuant to the related Intercreditor Agreement will not be available for distributions on the certificates or for the reimbursement of Nonrecoverable Advances of principal or interest with respect to the related Mortgage Loan, but will be available, in accordance with the PSA and related Intercreditor Agreement, for the reimbursement of any Servicing Advances with respect to the related Serviced Whole Loan. If a Servicing Advance by the master servicer or the special servicer (or trustee, as applicable) on a Serviced Whole Loan becomes a Nonrecoverable Advance and the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, is unable to recover such amounts from related proceeds or the related Companion Loan, as applicable, the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee (as applicable) will be permitted to recover such Nonrecoverable Advance (including interest thereon) out of general collections on or relating to the Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account.
If the funds in the Collection Account relating to the Mortgage Loans allocable to principal on the Mortgage Loans are insufficient to fully reimburse the party entitled to reimbursement, then such party as an accommodation may elect, on a monthly basis, at its sole option and discretion to defer reimbursement of the portion that exceeds such amount allocable to principal (in which case interest will continue to accrue on the unreimbursed portion of the advance) for a time as required to reimburse the excess portion from principal for a consecutive period up to 12 months (provided that, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan, any such deferral exceeding 6 months will require, prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event, the consent of the Directing Certificateholder) and any election to so defer will be deemed to be in accordance with the Servicing Standard; provided that no such deferral may occur at any time to the extent that amounts otherwise distributable as principal are available for such reimbursement.
410
In connection with a potential election by the master servicer or the trustee to refrain from the reimbursement of all or a portion of a particular Nonrecoverable Advance during the Collection Period for any Distribution Date, the master servicer or the trustee will be authorized to wait for principal collections on the Mortgage Loans to be received until the end of such Collection Period before making its determination of whether to refrain from the reimbursement of all or a portion of a particular Nonrecoverable Advance; provided, however, that if, at any time the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, elects, in its sole discretion, not to refrain from obtaining such reimbursement or otherwise determines that the reimbursement of a Nonrecoverable Advance during a Collection Period will exceed the full amount of the principal portion of general collections on or relating to the Mortgage Loans deposited in the Collection Account for such Distribution Date, then the master servicer or the trustee, as applicable, will be required to use its reasonable efforts to give the 17g-5 Information Provider 15 days’ notice of such determination for posting on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website, unless extraordinary circumstances make such notice impractical, which means (1) that party determines in its sole discretion that waiting 15 days after such a notice could jeopardize its ability to recover such Nonrecoverable Advance, (2) changed circumstances or new or different information becomes known to that party that could affect or cause a determination or whether any Advance is a Nonrecoverable Advance or whether to deter reimbursement of a Nonrecoverable Advance or the determination in clause (1) above, or (3) in the case of the master servicer, it has not timely received from the trustee information required by the master servicer to consider in determining whether to defer reimbursement of a Nonrecoverable Advance. If any of the circumstances described in clause (1), clause (2) or clause (3) above apply, the master servicer or trustee, as applicable, must give the 17g-5 Information Provider notice for posting of the anticipated reimbursement as soon as reasonably practicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, failure to give such notice will in no way affect the master servicer’s or the trustee’s election whether to refrain from obtaining such reimbursement or right to obtain reimbursement.
The master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will be entitled to recover any Advance that is outstanding at the time that a Mortgage Loan is modified but is not repaid in full by the borrower in connection with such modification but becomes an obligation of the borrower to pay such amounts in the future (such Advance, together with interest on that Advance, a “Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount”) out of principal collections on the Mortgage Loans in the Collection Account.
Any amount that constitutes all or a portion of any Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount may in the future be determined to constitute a Nonrecoverable Advance and thereafter will be recoverable as any other Nonrecoverable Advance.
In connection with its recovery of any Advance, each of the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will be entitled to be paid, out of any amounts relating to the Mortgage Loans then on deposit in the Collection Account, interest at the Prime Rate (the “Reimbursement Rate”) accrued on the amount of the Advance from the date made to, but not including, the date of reimbursement. Neither the master servicer nor the trustee will be entitled to interest on P&I Advances if the related Periodic Payment is received on or before the related Due Date and any applicable grace period has expired or if the related Periodic Payment is received after the Determination Date but on or prior to the P&I Advance Date. The “Prime Rate” will be the prime rate, for any day, set forth in The Wall Street Journal, New York City edition.
See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” for reimbursements of servicing advances made in respect of a Non-Serviced Whole Loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA.
411
Accounts
The master servicer is required to establish and maintain, or cause to be established and maintained, one or more accounts and subaccounts (collectively, the “Collection Account”) in its own name on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders. The master servicer is required to deposit in the Collection Account on a daily basis (and in no event later than the 2nd business day following receipt in available and properly identified funds) all payments and collections due after the Cut-off Date and other amounts received or advanced with respect to the Mortgage Loans (including, without limitation, all proceeds (the “Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds”) received under any hazard, title or other insurance policy that provides coverage with respect to a Mortgaged Property or the related Mortgage Loan or in connection with the full or partial condemnation of a Mortgaged Property (other than proceeds applied to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property or released to the related borrower in accordance with the Servicing Standard (or, if applicable, the special servicer) and/or the terms and conditions of the related Mortgage) and all other amounts received and retained in connection with the liquidation of any Mortgage Loan that is defaulted and any related defaulted Companion Loan or property acquired by foreclosure or otherwise (the “Liquidation Proceeds”)) together with the net operating income (less reasonable reserves for future expenses) derived from the operation of any REO Properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the collections on any Whole Loan will be limited to the portion of such amounts that are payable to the holder of the related Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Intercreditor Agreement.
The master servicer will also be required to establish and maintain a segregated custodial account (each, a “Companion Distribution Account”) with respect to any Serviced Companion Loan, which may be a sub-account of the Collection Account, and deposit amounts collected in respect of such Serviced Companion Loan in such Companion Distribution Account. The issuing entity will only be entitled to amounts on deposit in any Companion Distribution Account to the extent these funds are not otherwise payable to the holder of a Serviced Companion Loan or payable or reimbursable to any party to the PSA. Any amounts in a Companion Distribution Account to which the issuing entity is entitled will be transferred on a monthly basis to the Collection Account.
With respect to each Distribution Date, the master servicer will be required to disburse from the Collection Account and remit to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account, to the extent of funds on deposit in the Collection Account, on the related P&I Advance Date, the Available Funds for such Distribution Date and any Yield Maintenance Charges or Prepayment Premiums received as of the related Determination Date. The certificate administrator is required to establish and maintain various accounts, including a “Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account” and a “Upper-Tier REMIC Distribution Account”, both of which may be sub-accounts of a single account, (collectively, the “Distribution Accounts”), in its own name on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders.
On each Distribution Date, the certificate administrator is required to apply amounts on deposit in the Upper-Tier REMIC Distribution Account (which will include all funds that were remitted by the master servicer from the Collection Account, plus, among other things, any P&I Advances less amounts, if any, distributable to the Class R certificates) as set forth in the PSA generally to make distributions of interest and principal from Available Funds to the holders of the Regular Certificates, as described under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions”.
The certificate administrator is also required to establish and maintain an account (the “Interest Reserve Account”) which may be a sub-account of the Distribution Account, in its
412
own name on behalf of the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders. On the P&I Advance Date occurring each February and on any P&I Advance Date occurring in any January which occurs in a year that is not a leap year (in each case, unless the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the certificate administrator will be required to deposit amounts remitted by the master servicer or P&I Advances made on the related Mortgage Loans into the Interest Reserve Account during the related interest period, in respect of the Mortgage Loans that accrue interest on an Actual/360 Basis (collectively, the “Actual/360 Loans”), in an amount equal to one day’s interest at the Net Mortgage Rate for each such Actual/360 Loan on its Stated Principal Balance and as of the Distribution Date in the month preceding the month in which the P&I Advance Date occurs, to the extent a Periodic Payment or P&I Advance or other deposit is made in respect of the Mortgage Loans (all amounts so deposited in any consecutive January (if applicable) and February, “Withheld Amounts”). On the P&I Advance Date occurring each March (or February, if the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the certificate administrator will be required to withdraw from the Interest Reserve Account an amount equal to the Withheld Amounts from the preceding January (if applicable) and February, if any, and deposit that amount into the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account. With respect to each Mortgage Loan that accrues interest on Actual/360 Basis, an amount equal to two days of interest on the Cut-off Date Balance of such Mortgage Loan at the related Net Mortgage Rate, will be required to be delivered by the related Mortgage Loan Seller to the master servicer on the Closing Date for deposit into the Collection Account (the “Interest Deposit Amount”).
The certificate administrator will also be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Excess Interest Distribution Account”), which may, together with any other Securitization Account(s), be a sub-account of a single account. On the P&I Advance Date immediately preceding the applicable Distribution Date, the master servicer is required to remit to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Excess Interest Distribution Account an amount equal to any Excess Interest received by the master servicer during the related Collection Period.
The certificate administrator may be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account”), which may be a sub-account of the Distribution Account, in its
own name on behalf of the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders. To the extent that any gains are realized on sales of Mortgaged Properties (or, with respect to any Whole Loan, the portion of such amounts that are payable on the related Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Intercreditor Agreement), such gains will be deposited into the Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account and will be applied on the applicable Distribution Date as part of Available Funds to all amounts due and payable on the Regular Certificates including to reimburse for Realized Losses previously allocated to such certificates and to the extent not so applied, such gains will be held and applied to all amounts due and payable on the Regular Certificates and to offset future Realized Losses, if any (as determined by the special servicer). Any remaining amounts will be distributed on the Class R certificates on the final Distribution Date.
The special servicer will also be required to establish one or more segregated custodial accounts (each, an “REO Account”) for collections from REO Properties. Each REO Account will be maintained by the special servicer in either its own name or in the name of the limited liability company wholly owned by the Trust and which is managed by the special servicer formed to hold title to the foreclosure property on behalf of the trustee and for the benefit of the Certificateholders.
The Collection Account, the Distribution Accounts, the Interest Reserve Account, the Companion Distribution Account, Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account, the Excess Interest Distribution Account and the REO Account are collectively referred to as the “Securitization
413
Accounts” (but with respect to any Whole Loan, only to the extent of the issuing entity’s interest in the Whole Loan). Each of the foregoing accounts will be held at a depository institution or trust company meeting the requirements of the PSA.
Amounts on deposit in the foregoing accounts may be invested in certain United States government securities and other investments meeting the requirements of the PSA (“Permitted Investments”). Interest or other income earned on funds in the accounts maintained by the master servicer, the certificate administrator or the special servicer will be payable to each of them as additional compensation, and each of them will be required to bear any losses resulting from its investment of such funds.
Withdrawals from the Collection Account
The master servicer may, from time to time, make withdrawals from the Collection Account (or the applicable subaccount of the Collection Account, exclusive of the applicable Companion Distribution Account that may be a subaccount of the Collection Account) for any of the following purposes, in each case only to the extent permitted under the PSA and with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, subject to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement, without duplication (the order set forth below not constituting an order of priority for such withdrawals):
(i) to remit on each P&I Advance Date (A) to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account certain portions of the Available Funds and any Prepayment Premiums or Yield Maintenance Charges attributable to the Mortgage Loans on the related Distribution Date and (B) to the certificate administrator for deposit into the Excess Interest Distribution Account an amount equal to the Excess Interest received by the master servicer in the applicable one month period ending on the related Determination Date, if any;
(ii) to pay or reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee, as applicable, pursuant to the terms of the PSA for Advances made by any of them and interest on Advances (the master servicer’s, special servicer’s or the trustee’s respective right, as applicable, to reimbursement for items described in this clause (ii) being limited as described above under “—Advances”) (provided that with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, such reimbursements are subject to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement);
(iii) to pay to the master servicer and special servicer, as compensation, the aggregate unpaid servicing compensation;
(iv) to pay to the operating advisor the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee (but, with respect to the period when the outstanding Certificate Balances of the Control Eligible Certificates have not been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses to such certificates, only to the extent actually received from the related borrower) or the Operating Advisor Fee;
(v) to pay to the asset representations reviewer the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee and any unpaid Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee (but only to the extent such Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee is to be paid by the issuing entity);
(vi) to reimburse the trustee, the special servicer and the master servicer, as applicable, for certain Nonrecoverable Advances or Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts;
414
(vii) to reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable, for any unreimbursed expenses reasonably incurred with respect to each related Mortgage Loan that has been repurchased or substituted by such person pursuant to the PSA or otherwise;
(viii) to reimburse the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee for any unreimbursed expenses reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the enforcement of the related mortgage loan seller’s obligations under the applicable section of the related MLPA;
(ix) to pay for any unpaid costs and expenses incurred by the issuing entity;
(x) to pay itself and the special servicer, as applicable, as additional servicing compensation, (A) interest and investment income earned in respect of amounts relating to the issuing entity held in the Collection Account and the Companion Distribution Account (but only to the extent of the net investment earnings during the applicable one month period ending on the related Distribution Date) and (B) certain penalty charges and default interest;
(xi) to recoup any amounts deposited in the Collection Account in error;
(xii) to the extent not reimbursed or paid pursuant to any of the above clauses, to reimburse or pay the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the depositor or any of their respective directors, officers, members, managers, employees and agents, unpaid additional expenses of the issuing entity and certain other unreimbursed expenses incurred by such person pursuant to and to the extent reimbursable under the PSA and to satisfy any indemnification obligations of the issuing entity under the PSA;
(xiii) to pay for the cost of the opinions of counsel or the cost of obtaining any extension to the time in which the issuing entity is permitted to hold REO Property;
(xiv) to pay any applicable federal, state or local taxes imposed on any Trust REMIC, or any of their assets or transactions, together with all incidental costs and expenses, to the extent that none of the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator or the trustee is liable under the PSA;
(xv) to pay the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee;
(xvi) to reimburse the certificate administrator out of general collections on the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties for legal expenses incurred by and reimbursable to it by the issuing entity of any administrative or judicial proceedings related to an examination or audit by any governmental taxing authority;
(xvii) to pay the related mortgage loan seller or any other person, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, if any, previously purchased or replaced by such person pursuant to the PSA, all amounts received thereon subsequent to the date of purchase or replacement relating to periods after the date of purchase or replacement;
415
(xviii) to remit to the certificate administrator for deposit in the Interest Reserve Account the amounts required to be deposited in the Interest Reserve Account pursuant to the PSA;
(xix) to remit to the companion paying agent for deposit into the Companion Distribution Account the amounts required to be deposited pursuant to the PSA; and
(xx) to clear and terminate its Collection Account pursuant to a plan for termination and liquidation of the issuing entity.
No amounts payable or reimbursable to parties to the PSA out of general collections that do not specifically relate to a Serviced Whole Loan may be reimbursable from amounts that would otherwise be payable to the related Companion Loan.
Certain costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of any related Servicing Advances) allocable to a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Serviced Whole Loan may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the other Mortgage Loans, subject to the issuing entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on the related Companion Loan or from general collections with respect to the securitization of the related Companion Loan. If the master servicer makes, with respect to any related Serviced Whole Loan, any reimbursement or payment out of the Collection Account to cover the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan’s share of any cost, expense, indemnity, Servicing Advance or interest on such Servicing Advance, or fee with respect to such Serviced Whole Loan, then the master servicer (with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan or a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans and REO Properties) must use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to collect such amount out of collections on such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or, if and to the extent permitted under the related Intercreditor Agreement, from the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
The master servicer will also be entitled to make withdrawals, from time to time, from the Collection Account of amounts necessary for the payments or reimbursements required to be paid to the parties to the applicable Non-Serviced PSA, pursuant to the applicable Intercreditor Agreement and the applicable Non-Serviced PSA. See “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
If a P&I Advance is made with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is part of a Whole Loan, then that P&I Advance, together with interest on such P&I Advance, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on that Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “—Advances” above, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the related Serviced Companion Loan. Likewise, the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee, the Operating Advisor Fee and the Asset Representations Reviewer Fee that accrue with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that is part of a Whole Loan and any other amounts payable to the operating advisor may only be paid out of payments and other collections on such Mortgage Loan and/or the Mortgage Pool generally, but not out of payments or other collections on the related Serviced Companion Loan.
416
Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses
General
The parties to the PSA other than the depositor will be entitled to payment of certain fees as compensation for services performed under the PSA. Below is a summary of the fees payable to the parties to the PSA from amounts that the issuing entity is entitled to receive. In addition, CREFC® will be entitled to a license fee for use of its names and trademarks, including the CREFC® Investor Reporting Package. Certain additional fees and costs payable by the related borrowers are allocable to the parties to the PSA other than the depositor, but such amounts are not payable from amounts that the issuing entity is entitled to receive.
The amounts available for distribution on the certificates on any Distribution Date will generally be net of the following amounts:
Type/Recipient(1) |
Amount(1) |
Source(1) |
Frequency | |||
Fees | ||||||
Master
Servicing Fee / Master Servicer |
With respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan and any REO Loan, the product of the monthly portion of the related annual Servicing Fee Rate calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan. | Out of recoveries of interest with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) or if unpaid after final recovery on the related Mortgage Loan, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly | |||
Special Servicing Fee / Special Servicer | With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the related Serviced Companion Loan that are Specially Serviced Loans (including REO Properties), the product of the monthly portion of the related annual Special Servicing Fee Rate calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of such Specially Serviced Loan. | First, from liquidation proceeds, insurance and condemnation proceeds, and collections in respect of the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan), and then from general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly |
417
Type/Recipient(1) |
Amount(1) |
Source(1) |
Frequency |
Workout
Fee / Special Servicer(2) |
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the related Serviced Companion Loan that are Corrected Loans, the Workout Fee Rate multiplied by all payments of interest and principal received on such Mortgage Loan and the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan for so long as they remain a Corrected Loan. | Out of each collection of interest, principal, and prepayment consideration received on the related Mortgage Loan (and each related Serviced Companion Loan) and then from general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Time to time | |||
Liquidation
Fee / Special Servicer(2) |
With respect to (i) each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the related Serviced Companion Loan that are Specially Serviced Loans for which the special servicer obtains a full, partial or discounted payoff or any liquidation proceeds, insurance proceeds and condemnation proceeds, an amount calculated by application of a Liquidation Fee Rate to the related payment or proceeds and (ii) in certain circumstances, each Mortgage Loan repurchased by a mortgage loan seller (or as to which a Loss of Value Payment is made), an amount calculated by application of the Liquidation Fee Rate to the related payment or proceeds (exclusive of default interest). | From any liquidation proceeds, insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds and any other revenues received with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (and each related Serviced Companion Loan) and then from general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Time to time | |||
Additional Servicing Compensation / Master Servicer and/or Special Servicer(3) | All modification fees, assumption application fees, defeasance fees, assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, late payment charges, default interest, review fees and other similar fees actually collected on the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan. | Related payments made by borrowers with respect to the related Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan. | Time to time |
418
Type/Recipient(1) |
Amount(1) |
Source(1) |
Frequency |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee/Certificate Administrator | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the monthly portion of the annual Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate multiplied by the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan. | Out of general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account or the Distribution Account. | Monthly | |||
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee/Trustee | With respect to each Distribution Date, a portion of the monthly portion of the annual Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee. | Out of general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account or the Distribution Account. | Monthly | |||
Operating Advisor Fee / Operating Advisor | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the monthly portion of the annual Operating Advisor Fee Rate multiplied by the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan. | First, out of recoveries of interest with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and then, if the related Mortgage Loan has been liquidated, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly | |||
Operating Advisor Consulting Fee / Operating Advisor | $10,000 for each Major Decision made with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan) (or, with respect to the period when the outstanding Certificate Balances of the Control Eligible Certificates have not been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses to such certificates, such lesser amount as the related borrower agrees to pay with respect to such Mortgage Loan). | Payable by the related borrower when incurred during the period when the outstanding Certificate Balances of the Control Eligible Certificates have not been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses to such certificates; and when incurred subsequent to such period, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account. | Time to time |
419
Type/Recipient(1) |
Amount(1) |
Source(1) |
Frequency |
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee / Asset Representations Reviewer | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the monthly portion of the annual Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate multiplied by the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan (including each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, but excluding any Companion Loan). | Out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account. | Monthly | |||
Asset Representations Reviewer Upfront Fee | A fee of $5,000 on the Closing Date. | Payable by the mortgage loan sellers. | At closing | |||
Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee | For each Delinquent Loan, the sum of: (i) $15,000, plus (ii) $1,500 per additional Mortgaged Property in excess of one Mortgaged Property with respect to such Delinquent Loan, plus (iii) $2,000 per Mortgaged Property subject to a ground lease with respect to such Delinquent Loan, plus (iv) $1,000 per Mortgaged Property with respect to such Delinquent Loan subject to a franchise, hotel management or hotel license agreement, subject, in the case of each of clauses (i) through (iv), to adjustments on the basis of the year-end Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, or other similar index if the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers is no longer calculated for the year of the Closing Date and for the year of the occurrence of the Asset Review. | Payable by the related mortgage loan seller; provided, however, that if (i) the related mortgage loan seller is insolvent or (ii) at any time after the outstanding Certificate Balances of the Control Eligible Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the application of realized losses to such Certificates and the related mortgage loan seller fails to pay such amount within 90 days of written request by the asset representations reviewer, such fee will be paid by the trust out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account. | In connection with each Asset Review with respect to a Delinquent Loan. |
420
Type/Recipient(1) |
Amount(1) |
Source(1) |
Frequency |
Servicing Advances / Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Trustee | To the extent of funds available, the amount of any Servicing Advances. | First, from funds collected with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan), and with respect to any Nonrecoverable Advance or a Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount, then out of general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account, subject to certain limitations. | Time to time | |||
Interest
on Servicing Advances / Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Trustee |
At a rate per annum equal to the Reimbursement Rate calculated on the number of days the related Advance remains unreimbursed. | First, out of late payment charges and default interest on the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan), and then, after or at the same time such Servicing Advance is reimbursed, out of any other amounts then on deposit in the Collection Account, subject to certain limitations. | Time to time | |||
P&I
Advances / Master Servicer and Trustee |
To the extent of funds available, the amount of any P&I Advances. | First, from funds collected with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and then, with respect to a Nonrecoverable Advance or a Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount, out of general collections on deposit in the Collection Account. | Time to time | |||
Interest on P&I Advances / Master Servicer and Trustee | At a rate per annum equal to the Reimbursement Rate calculated on the number of days the related Advance remains unreimbursed. | First, out of default interest and late payment charges on the related Mortgage Loan and then, after or at the same time such P&I Advance is reimbursed, out of general collections then on deposit in the Collection Account with respect to the other Mortgage Loans. | Monthly |
421
Type/Recipient(1) |
Amount(1) |
Source(1) |
Frequency |
Indemnification
Expenses / Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Depositor, Master Servicer, Special Servicer, Operating Advisor or Asset Representations Reviewer and any director, officer, employee or agent of any of the foregoing parties |
Amount to which such party is entitled for indemnification under the PSA. | Out of general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account or the Distribution Account (and, under certain circumstances, from collections on any Serviced Companion Loan). | Time to time | |||
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee / CREFC® | With respect to each Distribution Date, an amount equal to the product of the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate multiplied by the outstanding principal amount of each Mortgage Loan. | Out of general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans on deposit in the Collection Account. | Monthly | |||
Expenses of the issuing entity not advanced (which may include reimbursable expenses incurred by the operating advisor or asset representations reviewer, expenses relating to environmental remediation or appraisals, expenses of operating REO Property and expenses incurred by any independent contractor hired to operate REO Property) | Based on third party charges. | First from collections on the related Mortgage Loan (income on the related REO Property), if applicable, and then from general collections with respect to Mortgage Loans in the Collection Account (and custodial account with respect to a Serviced Companion Loan, if applicable), subject to certain limitations. | Time to time |
(1) | With respect to any Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan (or any Specially Serviced Loan) in respect of which an REO Property was acquired, all references to Mortgage Loan, Companion Loan, Specially Serviced Loan in this table will be deemed to also be references to or to also include any REO Loans. |
With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related master servicer, special servicer, certificate administrator, trustee, operating advisor, if any, and/or asset representations reviewer, if any, under the related Non-Serviced PSA will be entitled to receive similar fees and reimbursements with respect to that Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan in amounts, from sources and at frequencies that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to those described above and, in certain cases (for example, with respect to unreimbursed special servicing fees and servicing advances with respect to each Non-Serviced Whole Loan), such amounts may be reimbursable from general collections on the other Mortgage Loans to the extent not recoverable from the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan.
422
In connection with the servicing and administration of any Serviced Whole Loan pursuant to the terms of the PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement, the master servicer and special servicer will be entitled to servicing compensation, without duplication, with respect to the related Serviced Companion Loan as well as the related Mortgage Loan to the extent consistent with the PSA and not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement.
(2) | Subject to certain offsets as described below. Circumstances as to when a Liquidation Fee or a Workout Fee is not payable are set forth in this “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses” section. |
(3) | Allocable between the master servicer and the special servicer as provided in the PSA. |
Master Servicing Compensation
The fee of the master servicer including the fee of any primary or other sub-servicer (the “Servicing Fee”) will be payable monthly from amounts allocable in respect of interest received in respect of each Mortgage Loan, Serviced Companion Loan (to the extent not prohibited under the related Intercreditor Agreement) and REO Loan (other than the portion of any REO Loan related to any Non-Serviced Companion Loan) (including Specially Serviced Loans and any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan constituting a “specially serviced loan” under any related Non-Serviced PSA) and will accrue at a rate (the “Servicing Fee Rate”) on the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan, Serviced Companion Loan or REO Loan, equal to a per annum rate ranging from 0.00250% to 0.07125%. The Servicing Fee payable to the master servicer with respect to any related Serviced Companion Loan will be payable, subject to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement, from amounts payable in respect of the related Companion Loan.
In addition to the Servicing Fee, the master servicer will be entitled to retain, as additional servicing compensation (other than with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), the following amounts to the extent collected from the related borrower:
● | 100% of Excess Modification Fees related to any modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement and that do not involve a Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision and 50% of Excess Modification Fees related to any modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Mortgage Loans (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement and that involve one or more Major Decisions or Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions (whether or not processed by the special servicer); |
● | 100% of all assumption application fees received on any Mortgage Loans, only for which the master servicer is processing the underlying assumption related transaction (including any related Serviced Companion Loan to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement) (whether or not the consent of the special servicer is required) and 100% of all defeasance fees (provided that for the avoidance of doubt, any such defeasance fee will not include any Modification Fees or waiver fees in connection with a defeasance that the special servicer is entitled to under the PSA); |
● | 100% of assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, review fees and similar fees pursuant to the PSA on any Mortgage Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans (including any related Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent not |
423
prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement) which do not involve a Major Decision or a Special Servicer Non-Major Decision;
● | 50% of all assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, review fees and similar fees (other than assumption application and defeasance fees), in each case, with respect to all Mortgage Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans (including any related Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement) which involve a Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (whether or not processed by the special servicer) and only to the extent that all amounts then due and payable with respect to the related Mortgage Loan have been paid; |
● | 50% of all fees (other than assumption application fees) related to Major Decisions and Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions with respect to Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans (and, solely with respect to clause (xviii) of the definition of “Major Decision”, Specially Serviced Loans) regardless of whether the master servicer or the special servicer processes such Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision; |
● | 100% of charges by the master servicer collected for checks returned for insufficient funds with respect to accounts held by the master servicer; |
● | 100% of charges for beneficiary statements actually paid by the related borrowers under such Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) to the extent such beneficiary statements are prepared by the master servicer; |
● | the excess, if any, of Prepayment Interest Excesses over Prepayment Interest Shortfalls arising from any principal prepayments on such Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan; and |
● | late payment charges, demands and default interest paid by such borrowers (that were accrued while the related Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any related Serviced Companion Loan (to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement) were not Specially Serviced Loans), but only to the extent such late payment charges, demands and default interest are not needed to pay interest on Advances or certain additional trust fund expenses (excluding Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees and Workout Fees) incurred with respect to the related Mortgage Loan or, if provided under the related Intercreditor Agreement, any related Serviced Companion Loan since the Closing Date. |
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the master servicer and the special servicer will each be entitled to charge and retain reasonable review fees in connection with any borrower request to the extent such fees are not prohibited under the related Mortgage Loan documents and are actually paid by or on behalf of the related borrower.
With respect to any of the preceding fees as to which both the master servicer and the special servicer are entitled to receive a portion thereof, the master servicer and the special servicer will each have the right in their sole discretion, but not any obligation, to reduce or elect not to charge its respective portion of such fee; provided that (A) neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have the right to reduce or elect not to charge the portion of any such fee due to the other and (B) to the extent either the master servicer or the special servicer exercises its right to reduce or elect not to charge its respective portion in any such fee, the party that reduced or elected not to charge its respective portion of
424
such fee will not have any right to share in any part of the other party’s portion of such fee. If the master servicer decides not to charge any fee, the special servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the special servicer would have been entitled if the master servicer had charged a fee and the master servicer will not be entitled to any of such fee charged by the special servicer. Similarly, if the special servicer decides not to charge any fee, the master servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the master servicer would have been entitled if the special servicer had charged a fee and the special servicer will not be entitled to any portion of such fee charged by the master servicer.
In addition, the master servicer also is authorized but not required to invest or direct the investment of funds held in the Collection Account and Companion Distribution Account in Permitted Investments, and the master servicer will be entitled to retain any interest or other income earned on those funds and will bear any losses resulting from the investment of these funds, except as set forth in the PSA. The master servicer also is entitled to retain any interest earned on any servicing escrow account maintained by the master servicer, to the extent the interest is not required to be paid to the related borrowers.
See “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”.
“Excess Modification Fees” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, the sum of (A) the excess, if any, of (i) any and all Modification Fees with respect to a modification, waiver, extension or amendment of any of the terms of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, over (ii) all unpaid or unreimbursed additional expenses (including, without limitation, reimbursement of Advances and interest on Advances to the extent not otherwise paid or reimbursed by the borrower but excluding Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) outstanding or previously incurred on behalf of the issuing entity with respect to the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, and reimbursed from such Modification Fees and (B) expenses previously paid or reimbursed from Modification Fees as described in the preceding clause (A), which expenses have been recovered from the related borrower or otherwise.
“Modification Fees” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, any and all fees with respect to a modification, extension, waiver or amendment that modifies, extends, amends or waives any term of such Mortgage Loan documents and/or related Serviced Companion Loan documents (as evidenced by a signed writing) agreed to by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable (other than all assumption fees, assumption application fees, consent fees, defeasance fees, Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees or Workout Fees).
With respect to the master servicer and the special servicer, the Excess Modification Fees collected and earned by such person from the related borrower (taken in the aggregate with any other Excess Modification Fees collected and earned by such person from the related borrower within the prior 12 months of the collection of the current Excess Modification Fees) will be subject to a cap equal to the greater of (i) 1.0% of the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan after giving effect to such modification, extension, waiver or amendment and (ii) $25,000.
The Servicing Fee is calculated on the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan (including each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and any successor REO Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loan. The Servicing Fee for each Mortgage Loan and any successor REO Loan is included in the Administrative Cost Rate listed for that Mortgage Loan
425
on Annex A-1. Any Servicing Fee Rate calculated on an Actual/360 Basis will be recomputed on the basis of twelve 30-day months, assuming a 360-day year (“30/360 Basis”) for purposes of calculating the Net Mortgage Rate.
Pursuant to the terms of the PSA, Midland will be entitled to retain a portion of the Servicing Fee with respect to each Mortgage Loan and any successor REO Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and, to the extent provided for in the related Intercreditor Agreement, each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, notwithstanding any termination or resignation of such party as master servicer; provided that Midland may not retain any portion of the Servicing Fee to the extent that portion of the Servicing Fee is required to appoint a successor master servicer. In addition, Midland will have the right to assign and transfer its rights to receive that retained portion of its Servicing Fee to another party.
The master servicer will be required to pay its overhead and any general and administrative expenses incurred by it in connection with its servicing activities under the PSA. The master servicer will not be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses incurred by it except as expressly provided in the PSA. The master servicer will be responsible for all fees payable to any sub-servicers. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount”.
With respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer (or primary servicer) will be entitled to a primary servicing fee accruing at a rate equal to 0.00125% per annum with respect to the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan, 0.00250% per annum with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan and 0.00125% per annum with respect to the BlueLinx Portfolio Mortgage Loan. With respect to each Servicing Shift Mortgage Loans, the master servicer (prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date) or the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer (or primary servicer) (on and after the Servicing Shift Securitization Date) will be entitled to a primary servicing fee accruing at a rate equal to 0.00250% per annum, with respect to the CrossPoint Mortgage Loan, and 0.00125% per annum, with respect to the City Square and Clay Street Mortgage Loan, which is included as part of the Servicing Fee Rate for purposes of the information presented in this prospectus.
Special Servicing Compensation
The principal compensation to be paid to the special servicer in respect of its special servicing activities will be the Special Servicing Fee, the Workout Fee and the Liquidation Fee.
The “Special Servicing Fee” will accrue with respect to each Specially Serviced Loan and each REO Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) on a loan-by-loan basis at a rate equal to the greater of a per annum rate of 0.25000% and the rate that would result in a special servicing fee of $3,500 for the related month (the “Special Servicing Fee Rate”), calculated on the basis of the Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan (including any REO Loan) and Companion Loan, as applicable, and in the same manner as interest is calculated on the Specially Serviced Loans or REO Loans, and will be payable monthly, first from Liquidation Proceeds, Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds, and collections in respect of the related REO Property or Specially Serviced Loan and then from general collections on all the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any REO Properties. Each Non-Serviced Whole Loan will be subject to a similar special servicing fee pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA. For further detail, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
426
The “Workout Fee” will generally be payable with respect to each Corrected Loan and will be calculated by application of a “Workout Fee Rate” of 1.00% to each collection (other than penalty charges and Excess Interest) of interest and principal (other than any amount for which a Liquidation Fee would be paid) (including scheduled payments, prepayments, balloon payments, and payments at the maturity date or at the Anticipated Repayment Date) received on the Corrected Loan for so long as it remains a Corrected Loan; provided, however, that after receipt by the special servicer of Workout Fees with respect to such Corrected Loan in an amount equal to $25,000, any Workout Fees in excess of such amount will be reduced by the Excess Modification Fee Amount received by the special servicer; provided, further, however, that in the event the Workout Fee collected over the course of such workout calculated at the Workout Fee Rate is less than $25,000, then the special servicer will be entitled to an amount from the final payment on the related Corrected Loan (including any related Serviced Companion Loan) that would result in total Workout Fees payable to the special servicer in respect of that Corrected Loan (including any related Serviced Companion Loan) equal to $25,000. The “Excess Modification Fee Amount” with respect to the master servicer or special servicer, any Corrected Loan and any particular modification, waiver, extension or amendment with respect to such Corrected Loan that gives rise to the payment of a Workout Fee, is an amount equal to the aggregate of any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (including the related Serviced Companion Loan, if applicable, unless prohibited under the related Intercreditor Agreement) and received and retained by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, as compensation within the prior 12 months of such modification, waiver, extension or amendment, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee. The Non-Serviced Whole Loan will be subject to a similar workout fee pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA. For further details, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
The Workout Fee with respect to any Corrected Loan will cease to be payable if the Corrected Loan again becomes a Specially Serviced Loan but will become payable again if and when the Mortgage Loan (including a Serviced Companion Loan) again becomes a Corrected Loan. The Workout Fee with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan that becomes a Corrected Loan will be reduced by any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to a related Mortgage Loan or REO Loan and received by the special servicer as compensation within the prior 12 months, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee.
The special servicer will not be entitled to any Workout Fee with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or if a Mortgage Loan or the Serviced Whole Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan solely because of an event described in clause (1) of the definition of “Specially Serviced Loan” under the heading “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Special Servicing Transfer Event” and such payoff thereafter timely occurs within the specified timeframe.
If the special servicer is terminated (other than for cause) or resigns, it will retain the right to receive any and all Workout Fees payable with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan that became a Corrected Loan during the period that it acted as special servicer and remained a Corrected Loan at the time of that termination or resignation, except that such Workout Fees will cease to be payable if the Corrected Loan again becomes a Specially Serviced Loan. The successor special servicer will not be entitled to any portion of those Workout Fees. If the special servicer resigns or is terminated (other than for cause), it will receive any Workout Fees payable on Specially Serviced Loans for
427
which the resigning or terminated special servicer had determined to grant a forbearance or cured the event of default through a modification, restructuring or workout negotiated by the special servicer and evidenced by a signed writing, but which had not as of the time the special servicer resigned or was terminated become a Corrected Loan solely because the borrower had not made 3 consecutive timely Periodic Payments and which subsequently becomes a Corrected Loan as a result of the borrower making such 3 consecutive timely Periodic Payments.
A “Liquidation Fee” will be payable to the special servicer with respect to (a) each Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property (except with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) as to which the special servicer receives (i) a full, partial or discounted payoff from the related borrower or (ii) any Liquidation Proceeds or Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds (including with respect to the related Companion Loan, if applicable) (in any case, other than amounts for which a Workout Fee has been paid, or will be payable) or (b) any Loss of Value Payment or Purchase Price paid by a mortgage loan seller with respect to any Mortgage Loan. The Liquidation Fee for each Specially Serviced Loan (and each related Serviced Companion Loan) and REO Property will be payable from, and will be calculated by application of a “Liquidation Fee Rate” of 1.00% to the related payment or proceeds (or, if such rate would result in an aggregate liquidation fee less than $25,000, then the Liquidation Fee Rate will be equal to such rate as would result in an aggregate liquidation fee equal to $25,000); provided that the Liquidation Fee with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan will be reduced by the amount of any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (including a Serviced Companion Loan) or REO Property and received by the special servicer as compensation within the prior 12 months, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary described above, no Liquidation Fee will be payable based upon, or out of, Liquidation Proceeds or a Loss of Value Payment received in connection with:
(i) (A) the repurchase of, or substitution for, any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan by a mortgage loan seller for a breach of representation or warranty or for defective or deficient Mortgage Loan documentation within the time period (or extension of such time period, if applicable) provided for such repurchase or substitution if such repurchase or substitution occurs prior to the termination of such time period (or extension of such time period, if applicable), or (B) the payment of a Loss of Value Payment in connection with any such breach or document defect if the applicable mortgage loan seller makes such Loss of Value Payment within the 90-day initial cure period or, if applicable, within the subsequent 90-day extended cure period,
(ii) the purchase of any Specially Serviced Loan or an REO Property that is subject to mezzanine indebtedness by the holder of the related mezzanine loan, in each case, within 90 days of such holder’s purchase option first becoming exercisable during the period prior to such Mortgage Loan becoming a Corrected Loan,
(iii) the purchase of all of the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties in connection with any termination of the issuing entity,
(iv) with respect to a Serviced Companion Loan, (A) a repurchase of such Serviced Companion Loan by the related mortgage loan seller for a breach of representation or warranty or for defective or deficient Mortgage Loan
428
documentation under the pooling and servicing agreement for the securitization trust that owns such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan within the time period (or extension of such time period) provided for such repurchase if such repurchase occurs prior to the termination of such extended period provided in such pooling and servicing agreement or (B) a purchase of such Serviced Companion Loan (if any) by an applicable party to a pooling and servicing agreement pursuant to a clean-up call or similar liquidation of another securitization entity,
(v) the purchase of any Specially Serviced Loan by the special servicer or its affiliate (except if such affiliate purchaser is the Directing Certificateholder or its affiliate; provided, however, that if no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, and such affiliated Directing Certificateholder or its affiliate purchases any Specially Serviced Loan within 90 days after the special servicer delivers to the Directing Certificateholder for approval the initial asset status report with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan, the special servicer will not be entitled to a liquidation fee in connection with such purchase by the Directing Certificateholder or its affiliates), or
(vi) if a Mortgage Loan or the Serviced Whole Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan only because of an event described in clause (1) of the definition of “Specially Serviced Loan” under the heading “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Special Servicing Transfer Event” and the related Liquidation Proceeds are received within 120 days following the related maturity date as a result of the related Mortgage Loan or the Serviced Whole Loan being refinanced or otherwise repaid in full provided such Specially Serviced Loan only became a Specially Serviced Loan on or after its maturity date.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that a liquidation fee is not payable due to the application of any of clauses (i) through (vi) above, the special servicer may still collect and retain a liquidation fee and similar fees from the related borrower to the extent provided for in, or not prohibited by, the related Mortgage Loan documents. Each Non-Serviced Whole Loan will be subject to a similar liquidation fee pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA. For further detail, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
The special servicer will also be entitled to additional servicing compensation in the form of:
(i) 100% of all Excess Modification Fees related to modifications, waivers, extensions or amendments of any Specially Serviced Loans;
(ii) 100% of all assumption application fees received on any Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan (to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement), only for which the special servicer is processing the underlying assumption related transaction;
(iii) 100% of all assumption fees and other related fees as further described in the PSA, received with respect to the Specially Serviced Loans;
(iv) 100% of waiver, consent and earnout fees and similar fees on any Specially Serviced Loan or certain other similar fees paid by the related borrower;
429
(v) 50% of all Excess Modification Fees and assumption fees, consent fees, earnout fees, review fees and similar fees received with respect to all Mortgage Loans (including any Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreements, if applicable) (excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) that are not Specially Serviced Loans that involve one or more Major Decisions or Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions;
(vi) (A) 50% of all fees (other than assumption application fees) related to Major Decisions and Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions with respect to Mortgage Loans and Serviced Companion Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans (and, solely with respect to clause (xviii) of the definition of “Major Decision”, Specially Serviced Loans) regardless of whether the master servicer or the special servicer processes such Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision and (B) 100% of all fees related to Major Decisions and Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, except only 50% of such fees solely with respect to clause (xviii) of the definition of “Major Decision”;
(vii) 100% of charges by the special servicer collected for checks returned for insufficient funds with respect to the accounts held by the special servicer;
(viii) 100% of charges for beneficiary statements actually paid by the borrowers to the extent such beneficiary statements are prepared by the special servicer; and
(ix) late payment charges, demand charges and default interest paid by the borrowers and accrued while the related Mortgage Loans (including the related Companion Loan, if applicable, and to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement) were Specially Serviced Loans and that are not needed to pay interest on Advances or certain additional trust fund expenses with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (including the related Companion Loan, if applicable, to the extent not prohibited by the related Intercreditor Agreement) since the Closing Date.
The special servicer also is authorized but not required to invest or direct the investment of funds held in the REO Account and the Loss of Value Payment reserve account in Permitted Investments, and the special servicer will be entitled to retain any interest or other income earned on those funds and will bear any losses resulting from the investment of these funds, except as set forth in the PSA.
With respect to any of the preceding fees as to which both the master servicer and the special servicer are entitled to receive a portion thereof, the master servicer and the special servicer will each have the right in their sole discretion, but not any obligation, to reduce or elect not to charge its respective portion of such fee; provided that (A) neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have the right to reduce or elect not to charge the portion of any such fee due to the other and (B) to the extent either the master servicer or the special servicer exercises its right to reduce or elect not to charge its respective portion in any such fee, the party that reduced or elected not to charge its respective portion of such fee will not have any right to share in any part of the other party’s portion of such fee. If the master servicer decides not to charge any fee, the special servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its portion of the related fee to which the special servicer would have been entitled if the master servicer had charged a fee and the master servicer will not be entitled to any of such fee charged by the special servicer. Similarly if the special servicer decides not to charge any fee, the master servicer will nevertheless be entitled to charge its
430
portion of the related fee to which the master servicer would have been entitled if the special servicer had charged a fee and the special servicer will not be entitled to any portion of such fee charged by the master servicer.
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is serviced under the related Non-Serviced PSA (including on those occasions under such Non-Serviced PSA when the servicing of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan has been transferred from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer to the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer). Accordingly, in its capacity as the special servicer under the PSA, the special servicer will not be entitled to receive any special servicing compensation for any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan. Only the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be entitled to special servicing compensation on any such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and only the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be entitled to special servicing compensation on any related Non-Serviced Whole Loan.
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees
The PSA will provide that the special servicer and its affiliates will be prohibited from receiving or retaining any Disclosable Special Servicer Fees in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of any Mortgage Loan and Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, the management or disposition of any REO Property, or the performance of any other special servicing duties under the PSA. The PSA will also provide that, with respect to each Distribution Date, the special servicer must deliver or cause to be delivered to the master servicer within two business days following the Determination Date, and the master servicer must deliver, to the extent it has received, to the certificate administrator, without charge and on the P&I Advance Date, an electronic report which discloses and contains an itemized listing of any Disclosable Special Servicer Fees received by the special servicer or any of its affiliates with respect to such Distribution Date, provided that no such report will be due in any month during which no Disclosable Special Servicer Fees were received.
“Disclosable Special Servicer Fees” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and related Serviced Companion Loan (including any related REO Property), any compensation and other remuneration (including, without limitation, in the form of commissions, brokerage fees, rebates, or as a result of any other fee-sharing arrangement) received or retained by the special servicer or any of its affiliates that is paid by any person (including, without limitation, the issuing entity, any mortgagor, any manager, any guarantor or indemnitor in respect of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan and any purchaser of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan or REO Property) in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of any Mortgage Loan or related Serviced Companion Loan, the management or disposition of any REO Property, and the performance by the special servicer or any such affiliate of any other special servicing duties under the PSA, other than (1) any Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees and (2) any compensation to which the special servicer is entitled pursuant to the PSA or any Non-Serviced PSA.
“Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees” means any commercially reasonable treasury management fees, banking fees, title agency fees, insurance commissions or fees and appraisal fees received or retained by the special servicer or any of its affiliates in connection with any services performed by such party with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and Serviced Companion Loan (including any related REO Property) in accordance with the PSA.
The special servicer will be required to pay its overhead and any general and administrative expenses incurred by it in connection with its servicing activities under the
431
PSA. The special servicer will not be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses incurred by it except as expressly provided in the PSA. See “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount”.
Certificate Administrator and Trustee Compensation
As compensation for the performance of its routine duties, the trustee and the certificate administrator will be paid a fee (collectively, the “Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee”); provided that the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee includes the trustee fee. The Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of the Mortgage Loans and will be equal to the product of a rate equal to 0.0067% per annum (the “Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate”) and the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Loans and will be calculated in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans or REO Loans.
Operating Advisor Compensation
The fee of the operating advisor (the “Operating Advisor Fee”) will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan, and will be equal to 0.00137% with respect to each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan (the “Operating Advisor Fee Rate”) and the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Loans and will be calculated in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans and REO Loans.
An “Operating Advisor Consulting Fee” will be payable to the operating advisor with respect to each Major Decision on which the operating advisor has consultation obligations and performed its duties with respect to that Major Decision. The Operating Advisor Consulting Fee will be a fee for each such Major Decision equal to $10,000 (or such lesser amount as the related borrower agrees to pay) with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan); provided that the operating advisor may in its sole discretion reduce the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee with respect to any Major Decision; provided, further, however, that to the extent such fee is incurred after the outstanding Certificate Balances of the Control Eligible Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses to such certificates, such fee will be payable in full to the operating advisor as a trust fund expense.
Each of the Operating Advisor Fee and the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee will be payable from funds on deposit in the Collection Account out of amounts otherwise available to make distributions on the certificates as described above in “—Withdrawals from the Collection Account”, but with respect to the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee, only as and to the extent that such fee is actually received from the related borrower (other than as described above). If the operating advisor has consultation rights with respect to a Major Decision, the PSA will require the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, to use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to collect the applicable Operating Advisor Consulting Fee from the related borrower in connection with such Major Decision that are consistent with the efforts in accordance with the Servicing Standard that the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, would use to collect any fee owed to it by a borrower, but only to the extent not prohibited by the related Mortgage Loan documents, and in no event will it take any enforcement action with respect to the collection of such Operating Advisor Consulting Fee other than requests for collection. The master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will each be permitted to waive or reduce the amount of any such Operating Advisor Consulting Fee payable by the related borrower if it determines that such full or partial waiver is in accordance with the Servicing Standard; provided that the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will be required to
432
consult, on a non-binding basis, with the operating advisor prior to any such waiver or reduction.
In addition to the Operating Advisor Fee and the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee, the operating advisor will be entitled to reimbursement of Operating Advisor Expenses in accordance with the terms of the PSA. “Operating Advisor Expenses” for each Distribution Date will equal any unreimbursed indemnification amounts or additional trust fund expenses payable to the operating advisor pursuant to the PSA (other than the Operating Advisor Fee and the Operating Advisor Consulting Fee).
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation
The asset representations reviewer will be paid a fee of $5,000 (the “Asset Representations Reviewer Upfront Fee”) on the Closing Date. As compensation for the performance of its routine duties, the asset representations reviewer will be paid a fee (the “Asset Representations Reviewer Fee”). The Asset Representations Reviewer Fee will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of each Mortgage Loan (including each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, but excluding any Companion Loan) and REO Loan, will be equal to the product of a rate equal to 0.00048% per annum (the “Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate”) and the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Loans and will be calculated in the same manner as interest is calculated on such Mortgage Loans. In connection with each Asset Review with respect to each Delinquent Loan (in such case, a “Subject Loan”), the asset representations reviewer will be required to be paid a fee equal to (i) $15,000, plus (ii) $1,500 per additional Mortgaged Property in excess of one Mortgaged Property with respect to such Delinquent Loan, plus (iii) $2,000 per Mortgaged Property subject to a ground lease with respect to such Delinquent Loan, plus (iv) $1,000 per Mortgaged Property with respect to such Delinquent Loan subject to a franchise, hotel management or hotel license agreement, subject, in the case of each of clauses (i) through (iv), to adjustments on the basis of the year end Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, or other similar index if the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers is no longer calculated for the year of the Closing Date and for the year of the occurrence of the Asset Review (any such fee, the “Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee”).
The Asset Representations Reviewer Fee will be payable from funds on deposit in the Collection Account out of amounts otherwise available to make distributions on the certificates as described above in “—Withdrawals from the Collection Account”. The Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee with respect to each Delinquent Loan will be required to be paid by the related mortgage loan seller; provided, however, that if (i) the related mortgage loan seller is insolvent or (ii) at any time after the outstanding Certificate Balances of the Control Eligible Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the application of Realized Losses to such Certificates and the related mortgage loan seller fails to pay such amount within 90 days of written request by the asset representations reviewer, such fee will be paid by the trust following delivery by the asset representations reviewer of evidence reasonably satisfactory to the master servicer of such insolvency or failure to pay such amount (which evidence may be an officer’s certificate of the asset representations reviewer); provided, further, that notwithstanding any payment of such fee by the issuing entity to the asset representations reviewer, such fee will remain an obligation of the related mortgage loan seller and the Enforcing Servicer will be required, in accordance to the Servicing Standard, to pursue remedies against such mortgage loan seller to recover any such amounts to the extent paid by the issuing entity. The Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee with respect to a Delinquent Loan is required to be included in the Purchase Price for any Mortgage Loan that was the subject of a completed Asset Review and that is repurchased by the related mortgage loan seller, and
433
such portion of the Purchase Price received will be used to reimburse the trust for any such fees paid to the asset representations reviewer pursuant to the terms of the PSA.
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee will be paid to CREFC® on a monthly basis.
“CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee” with respect to each Mortgage Loan and REO Loan (other than the portion of an REO Loan related to any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) and for any Distribution Date is the amount accrued during the related Interest Accrual Period at the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate on the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan and REO Loan as of the close of business on the Distribution Date in such Interest Accrual Period; provided that such amounts will be computed for the same period and on the same interest accrual basis respecting which any related interest payment due or deemed due on the related Mortgage Loan and REO Loan is computed and will be prorated for partial periods. The CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee is a fee payable to CREFC® for a license to use the CREFC® Investor Reporting Package in connection with the servicing and administration, including delivery of periodic reports to the Certificateholders, of the issuing entity pursuant to the PSA. No CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee will be paid on any Companion Loan.
“CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate” with respect to each Mortgage Loan is a rate equal to 0.00050% per annum.
Appraisal Reduction Amounts
After an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or a Serviced Whole Loan, an Appraisal Reduction Amount is required to be calculated. An “Appraisal Reduction Event” will occur on the earliest of:
(1) 120 days after an uncured delinquency (without regard to the application of any grace period), other than any uncured delinquency in respect of a balloon payment, occurs in respect of the Mortgage Loan, a related Companion Loan or a Serviced Whole Loan, as applicable;
(2) the date on which a reduction in the amount of Periodic Payments on the Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, or a change in any other material economic term of the Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable (other than an extension of its maturity), becomes effective as a result of a modification of the related Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, by the special servicer;
(3) 30 days after the date on which a receiver has been appointed for the Mortgaged Property;
(4) 30 days after the date on which a borrower or the tenant at a single tenant property declares bankruptcy (and the bankruptcy petition is not otherwise dismissed within such time);
(5) 60 days after the date on which an involuntary petition of bankruptcy is filed with respect to the borrower if not dismissed within such time;
(6) 90 days after an uncured delinquency occurs in respect of a balloon payment with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, except where a refinancing is
434
anticipated within 120 days after the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan and related Companion Loan in which case 120 days after such uncured delinquency; and
(7) immediately after a Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan becomes an REO Loan;
provided, however, that the 30-day period referenced in clauses (3) and (4) above will not apply if the related Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan.
No Appraisal Reduction Event may occur at any time when the Certificate Balances of all classes of Subordinate Certificates have been reduced to zero.
The “Appraisal Reduction Amount” for any Distribution Date and for any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), Serviced Companion Loan or Serviced Whole Loan as to which any Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred, will be an amount, calculated by the special servicer (and, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, in consultation with the Directing Certificateholder and, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, in consultation with the Directing Certificateholder (except with respect to any such Excluded Loan) and the operating advisor and, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, in consultation with the operating advisor), as of the first Determination Date that is at least 10 business days following the later of (i) the date on which the special servicer receives an appraisal (together with information requested by the special servicer from the master servicer in accordance with the PSA reasonably necessary to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount) or conducts a valuation described below and (ii) the occurrence of such Appraisal Reduction Event, equal to the excess of
(a) the Stated Principal Balance of that Mortgage Loan or the Stated Principal Balance of the applicable Serviced Whole Loan, as the case may be, over
(b) the excess of
1. the sum of
a) | 90% of the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property as determined (A) by one or more MAI appraisals obtained by the special servicer with respect to that Mortgage Loan (together with any other Mortgage Loan cross-collateralized with such Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan with an outstanding principal balance equal to or in excess of $2,000,000 (the costs of which will be paid by the master servicer as an Advance), or (B) by an internal valuation performed by the special servicer (or at the special servicer’s election, by one or more MAI appraisals obtained by the special servicer) with respect to any Mortgage Loan (together with any other Mortgage Loan cross-collateralized with such Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan with an outstanding principal balance less than $2,000,000, minus with respect to any MAI appraisals such downward adjustments as the special servicer may make (without implying any obligation to do so) based upon its review of the appraisals and any other information it deems relevant; and |
b) | all escrows, letters of credit and reserves in respect of that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan as of the date of calculation; over |
2. the sum as of the Due Date occurring in the month of the date of determination of
435
a) | to the extent not previously advanced by the master servicer or the trustee, all unpaid interest due on that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan at a per annum rate equal to the Mortgage Rate, |
b) | all P&I Advances on the related Mortgage Loan and all Servicing Advances on the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan not reimbursed from the proceeds of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and interest on those Advances at the Reimbursement Rate in respect of that Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, and |
c) | all currently due and unpaid real estate taxes and assessments, insurance premiums and ground rents, unpaid Special Servicing Fees and all other amounts due and unpaid (including any capitalized interest whether or not then due and payable) with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (which taxes, premiums, ground rents and other amounts have not been the subject of an Advance by the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee, as applicable). |
Each Serviced Whole Loan will be treated as a single mortgage loan for purposes of calculating an Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the Mortgage Loan and Companion Loans, as applicable, that comprise such Serviced Whole Loan. Any Appraisal Reduction Amount in respect of a Serviced Whole Loan will be allocated, pro rata, to the related Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans based upon their respective outstanding principal balances.
The special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to order an appraisal or conduct a valuation promptly upon the occurrence of an Appraisal Reduction Event (other than with respect to a Non-Serviced Whole Loan). On the first Determination Date occurring on or after the tenth business day following the later of (a) receipt of the MAI appraisal (together with the information requested by the special servicer from the master servicer, reasonably necessary to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount) or the completion of the valuation and (b) the occurrence of such Appraisal Reduction Event, the special servicer will be required to calculate and report to the master servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder, the Appraisal Reduction Amount, taking into account the results of such appraisal or valuation and receipt of information requested by the special servicer from the master servicer reasonably necessary to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount.
Following the master servicer’s receipt from the special servicer of the calculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amounts, the master servicer will be required to provide such information to the certificate administrator in the form of the CREFC® loan periodic update file.
Each such report of the Appraisal Reduction Amount will also be forwarded by the master servicer (or the special servicer if the related Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan), to the extent the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan has been included in a securitization transaction, to the master servicer of such securitization into which the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan has been sold, or to the holder of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan by the master servicer (or the special servicer if the related Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan).
In the event that the special servicer has not received any required MAI appraisal within 60 days after the Appraisal Reduction Event (or, in the case of an appraisal in connection
436
with an Appraisal Reduction Event described in clauses (1) and (6) of the definition of Appraisal Reduction Event above, within 120 days (in the case of clause (1)) or 90 or 120 days (in the case of clause (6)), respectively, after the initial delinquency for the related Appraisal Reduction Event), the Appraisal Reduction Amount will be deemed to be an amount equal to 25% of the current Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) until an MAI appraisal or valuation is received (together with information requested by the special servicer from the master servicer in accordance with the PSA) or performed by the special servicer and the Appraisal Reduction Amount is calculated by the special servicer as of the first Determination Date that is at least 10 business days after the later of (a) the special servicer’s receipt of such MAI appraisal or the completion of the valuation and (b) the occurrence of such Appraisal Reduction Event. The master servicer will provide (via electronic delivery) the special servicer with any information in its possession that is reasonably required to determine, redetermine, calculate or recalculate any Appraisal Reduction Amount pursuant to its definition using reasonable efforts to deliver such information within four business days of the special servicer’s reasonable request; provided that the special servicer’s failure to timely make such a request will not relieve the master servicer of its obligation to use reasonable efforts to provide such information to the special servicer within 4 business days following the special servicer’s reasonable request. The master servicer will not calculate Appraisal Reduction Amounts.
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any Serviced Whole Loan as to which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred (unless the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan has remained current for 3 consecutive Periodic Payments, and with respect to which no other Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred with respect to that Mortgage Loan during the preceding 3 months (for such purposes taking into account any amendment or modification of such Mortgage Loan, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or Serviced Whole Loan)), the special servicer is required (i) within 30 days of each anniversary of the related Appraisal Reduction Event and (ii) upon its determination that the value of the related Mortgaged Property has materially changed, to notify the master servicer of the occurrence of such anniversary or determination and to order an appraisal (which may be an update of a prior appraisal), the cost of which will be paid by the master servicer as a Servicing Advance (or to the extent it would be a Nonrecoverable Advance, an expense of the issuing entity paid out of the Collection Account), or to conduct an internal valuation, as applicable. Based upon the appraisal or valuation and receipt of information reasonably requested by the special servicer from the master servicer necessary to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount, the special servicer is required to determine or redetermine, as applicable, and report to the master servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event and other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan, to the Directing Certificateholder, the amount and calculation or recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to the Mortgage Loan, Companion Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as applicable. Such report will also be forwarded to the holder of any related Companion Loan by the master servicer (or the special servicer if the related Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan). Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event (and unless the related Mortgage Loan is an Excluded Loan), the special servicer will consult with the Directing Certificateholder with respect to any appraisal, valuation or downward adjustment in connection with an Appraisal Reduction Amount. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special servicer will not be required to obtain an appraisal or valuation with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan that is the subject of an Appraisal Reduction Event to the extent the special servicer has obtained an appraisal or valuation with respect to the related Mortgaged Property within the 12-month period prior to the
437
occurrence of the Appraisal Reduction Event. Instead, the special servicer may use the prior appraisal or valuation in calculating any Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, provided that the special servicer is not aware of any material change to the Mortgaged Property that has occurred that would affect the validity of the appraisal or valuation.
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is subject to provisions in the related Non-Serviced PSA relating to appraisal reductions that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to the provisions described above. The existence of an appraisal reduction under a Non-Serviced PSA in respect of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will proportionately reduce the master servicer’s or the trustee’s, as the case may be, obligation to make P&I Advances on the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and will generally have the effect of reducing the amount otherwise available for distributions to the Certificateholders. Pursuant to such Non-Serviced PSA, the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be treated, together with each related Non-Serviced Companion Loan, as a single mortgage loan for purposes of calculating an appraisal reduction amount with respect to the loans that comprise a Non-Serviced Whole Loan. Any appraisal reduction calculated with respect to a Non-Serviced Whole Loan will generally be allocated to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan, on a pro rata basis based upon their respective Stated Principal Balances (although, in the case of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan, any calculation of an Appraisal Reduction Amount will first be allocated to the related Subordinate Companion Loans). Any appraisal reduction amount determined under such Non-Serviced PSA and allocable to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related intercreditor agreement will constitute an “Appraisal Reduction Amount” under the terms of the PSA with respect to the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
If any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any Serviced Whole Loan previously subject to an Appraisal Reduction Amount becomes a Corrected Loan, and no other Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred and is continuing with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, the Appraisal Reduction Amount and the related Appraisal Reduction Event will cease to exist.
As a result of calculating one or more Appraisal Reduction Amounts (and, in the case of any Whole Loan, to the extent allocated in the related Mortgage Loan), the amount of any required P&I Advance will be reduced, which will have the effect of reducing the allocable amount of interest available to the most subordinate class of certificates then-outstanding (i.e., first, to Class NR-RR certificates, second, to the Class F-RR certificates, third, to the Class E-RR certificates, fourth, to the Class D-RR certificates, fifth, to the Class D certificates, sixth, to the Class C certificates, seventh, to the Class B certificates, eighth, to the Class A-S certificates, and finally, pro rata based on their respective interest entitlements, to the Senior Certificates). See “—Advances”.
As of the first Determination Date following a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) becoming an AB Modified Loan, the special servicer will be required to calculate whether a Collateral Deficiency Amount exists with respect to such AB Modified Loan, taking into account the most recent appraisal obtained by the special servicer with respect to such Mortgage Loan, and all other information relevant to a Collateral Deficiency Amount determination. The master servicer will be required to provide (via electronic delivery) the special servicer with any information in its possession that is reasonably required to determine, redetermine, calculate or recalculate any Collateral Deficiency Amount for any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan using reasonable efforts to deliver such information within 4 business days of the special servicer’s reasonable request. Upon obtaining knowledge or receipt of notice by the master servicer that a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan
438
has become an AB Modified Loan, the master servicer will be required to (i) promptly request from the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer, Non-Serviced Special Servicer and Non-Serviced Trustee the most recent appraisal with respect to such AB Modified Loan, in addition to all other information reasonably required by the master servicer to calculate whether a Collateral Deficiency Amount exists with respect to such AB Modified Loan, and (ii) as of the first Determination Date following receipt by the master servicer of the appraisal and any other information set forth in the immediately preceding clause (i) that the master servicer reasonably expects to receive, calculate whether a Collateral Deficiency Amount exists with respect to such AB Modified Loan, taking into account the most recent appraisal obtained by the Non-Serviced Special Servicer with respect to such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, and all other information in its possession relevant to a Collateral Deficiency Amount determination. Upon obtaining actual knowledge or receipt of notice by any other party to the PSA that a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan has become an AB Modified Loan, such party will be required to promptly notify the master servicer thereof. None of the master servicer (with respect to Mortgage Loans other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), the special servicer (with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans), the trustee, the operating advisor or the certificate administrator will calculate or verify any Collateral Deficiency Amount.
A “Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount” as of any date of determination for any Mortgage Loan, is equal to the sum of (i) all Appraisal Reduction Amounts then in effect, and (ii) with respect to any AB Modified Loan, any Collateral Deficiency Amount then in effect. The master servicer and the certificate administrator will be entitled to conclusively rely on the special servicer’s calculation or determination of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan). With respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the special servicer and the certificate administrator will be entitled to conclusively rely on the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer’s calculation of any Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to such Mortgage Loan and on the master servicer’s calculation or determination of any Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to such Mortgage Loan.
“AB Modified Loan” means any Corrected Loan (1) that became a Corrected Loan (which includes for purposes of this definition any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan that became a “corrected loan” (or any term substantially similar thereto) pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA) due to a modification thereto that resulted in the creation of an A/B note structure (or similar structure) and as to which the new junior note(s) did not previously exist or the principal amount of the new junior note(s) was previously part of either an A note held by the issuing entity or the original unmodified Mortgage Loan and (2) as to which an Appraisal Reduction Amount is not in effect.
“Collateral Deficiency Amount” means, with respect to any AB Modified Loan as of any date of determination, the excess of (i) the Stated Principal Balance of such AB Modified Loan (taking into account the related junior note(s) and any pari passu notes included therein), over (ii) the sum of (in the case of a Whole Loan, solely to the extent allocable to the subject Mortgage Loan) (x) the most recent appraised value for the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, plus (y) solely to the extent not reflected or taken into account in such appraised value (or in the calculation of any related Appraisal Reduction Amount) and to the extent on deposit with, or otherwise under the control of, the lender as of the date of such determination, any capital or additional collateral contributed by the related borrower at the time the Mortgage Loan became (and as part of the modification related to) such AB Modified Loan for the benefit of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties (provided that in the case of an Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the amounts set forth in this clause (y) will be taken into account solely to the extent relevant
439
information is received by the master servicer), plus (z) any other escrows or reserves (in addition to any amounts set forth in the immediately preceding clause (y) and solely to the extent not reflected or taken into account in the calculation of any related Appraisal Reduction Amount) held by the lender in respect of such AB Modified Loan as of the date of such determination, which such excess, for the avoidance of doubt, will be determined separately from and exclude any related Appraisal Reduction Amounts. The master servicer and the certificate administrator will be entitled to conclusively rely on the special servicer’s calculation or determination of any Collateral Deficiency Amount (other than with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan). The certificate administrator, the special servicer and the operating advisor will be entitled to conclusively rely on the master servicer’s calculation of any Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan.
For purposes of determining the Controlling Class, the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event and the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to a related Mortgage Loan will be allocated to each class of Principal Balance Certificates in reverse sequential order to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance thereof until the related Certificate Balance of each such class is reduced to zero (i.e., first, to the Class NR-RR certificates, second, to the Class F-RR certificates, third, to the Class E-RR certificates, fourth, to the Class D-RR certificates, fifth, to the Class D certificates, sixth, to the Class C certificates, seventh, to the Class B certificates and finally, to the Class A-S certificates). In addition, for purposes of determining the Controlling Class and whether a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing or an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, Collateral Deficiency Amounts allocated to a related AB Modified Loan will be allocated to each class of Control Eligible Certificates in reverse sequential order to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance thereof until the related Certificate Balance of each such class is reduced to zero (i.e., first, to the Class NR-RR certificates, second, to the Class F-RR certificates, third, to the Class E-RR certificates, and fourth, to the Class D-RR certificates). For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of determining the Controlling Class and the occurrence of a Control Termination Event or Operating Advisor Consultation Event, any Class of Control Eligible Certificates will be allocated both applicable Appraisal Reduction Amounts and applicable Collateral Deficiency Amounts (the sum of which will constitute the applicable “Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount”), as described in this paragraph.
With respect to any Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount calculated for purposes of determining the Controlling Class and the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property will be determined on an “as-is” basis. The special servicer (in the case of a Mortgage Loan other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or the master servicer (in the case of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) will be required to promptly notify the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, and the master servicer will be required to notify the certificate administrator of (i) any Appraisal Reduction Amount, (ii) any Collateral Deficiency Amount, and (iii) any resulting Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount, and the certificate administrator will be required to promptly post notice of such Appraisal Reduction Amount, Collateral Deficiency Amount and/or Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount, as applicable, to the certificate administrator’s website.
Any class of Control Eligible Certificates, the Certificate Balance of which (taking into account the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts or Collateral Deficiency Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of such class) has been reduced to less than 25% of its initial Certificate Balance, is referred to as an “Appraised-Out Class”. Any Appraised-Out Class will no longer be the Controlling Class; provided, however, that if at any time, the Certificate Balances of the certificates other than the Control Eligible
440
Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans, then the Controlling Class will be the most subordinate class of Control Eligible Certificates that has an aggregate Certificate Balance greater than zero without regard to any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts. The holder of the majority (by Certificate Balance) of an Appraised-Out Class will have the right, at their sole expense, to require the special servicer to order (or, with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, require the master servicer to request from the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer) a second appraisal of any Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan) for which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred or as to which there exists a Collateral Deficiency Amount (such holders, the “Requesting Holders”). The special servicer will use its reasonable efforts to cause such appraisal to be (i) delivered within 30 days from receipt of the Requesting Holders’ written request and (ii) prepared on an “as-is” basis by an MAI appraiser. With respect to any such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the master servicer will be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such second appraisal from the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer and to forward such second appraisal to the special servicer. Upon receipt of such supplemental appraisal, the master servicer (for Collateral Deficiency Amounts on Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans), the Non-Serviced Special Servicer (for Appraisal Reduction Amounts on Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans to extent provided for in the applicable Non-Serviced PSA and applicable Intercreditor Agreement) and the special servicer (for any Mortgage Loan other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) will be required to determine, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, whether, based on its assessment of such supplemental appraisal, any recalculation of the applicable Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount, as applicable, is warranted and, if so warranted, such person will be required to recalculate such Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount, as applicable, based upon such supplemental appraisal and (in the case of the special servicer) any information received from the master servicer as described above. If required by any such recalculation, the applicable Appraised-Out Class will be reinstated as the Controlling Class and each Appraised-Out Class will, if applicable, have its related Certificate Balance notionally restored to the extent required by such recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amount or Collateral Deficiency Amount, if applicable. The certificate administrator, the operating advisor and the special servicer will be entitled to conclusively rely on the master servicer’s calculation or determination of any Collateral Deficiency Amount with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans.
Any Appraised-Out Class may not exercise any direction, control, consent and/or similar rights of the Controlling Class until such time, if any, as such class is reinstated as the Controlling Class; the rights of the Controlling Class will be exercised by the next most senior class of Control Eligible Certificates that is not an Appraised-Out Class, if any, during such period.
With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder will or is expected to be subject to provisions similar to those described above. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Maintenance of Insurance
To the extent permitted by the related Mortgage Loan and required by the Servicing Standard, the master servicer (with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan, but excluding any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) will be required to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to cause each borrower to maintain, and the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties other than a Mortgaged Property securing a
441
Non-Serviced Whole Loan and subject to the conditions set forth in the following sentence) will maintain, for the related Mortgaged Property all insurance coverage required by the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents; provided, however, that the master servicer (with respect to Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan) will not be required to cause the borrower to maintain and the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties) will not be required to maintain terrorism insurance to the extent that the failure of the related borrower to do so is an Acceptable Insurance Default (as defined below) or if the trustee does not have an insurable interest. Insurance coverage is required to be in the amounts (which, in the case of casualty insurance, is generally equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan and the replacement cost of the related Mortgaged Property), and from an insurer meeting the requirements, set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. If the borrower does not maintain such coverage, the master servicer (with respect to such Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Whole Loan), as the case may be, will be required to maintain such coverage to the extent such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates and the trustee has an insurable interest, as determined by the master servicer (with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan) or the special servicer (with respect to REO Properties other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Whole Loan), as applicable, in accordance with the Servicing Standard; provided that if any Mortgage Loan documents permit the holder thereof to dictate to the borrower the insurance coverage to be maintained on such Mortgaged Property, the master servicer or, with respect to REO Property, the special servicer will impose or maintain such insurance requirements as are consistent with the Servicing Standard taking into account the insurance in place at the origination of the Mortgage Loan; provided, further, that with respect to the immediately preceding proviso the master servicer will be obligated to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to cause the borrower to maintain (or to itself maintain) insurance against property damage resulting from terrorist or similar acts unless the borrower’s failure is an Acceptable Insurance Default as determined by the master servicer with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder (unless a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than with respect to any Excluded Loan). See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans” and “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties”.
Notwithstanding any contrary provision above, the master servicer will not be required to maintain, and will not be in default for failing to obtain, any earthquake or environmental insurance on any Mortgaged Property unless (other than with respect to a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) such insurance was required at the time of origination of the related Mortgage Loan, the trustee has an insurable interest and such insurance is currently available at commercially reasonable rates. In addition, the master servicer and special servicer will be entitled to rely on insurance consultants (at the applicable servicer’s expense) in determining whether any insurance is available at commercially reasonable rates. After the master servicer determines that a Mortgaged Property (other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) is located in an area identified as a federally designated special flood hazard area (and flood insurance has been made available), the master servicer will be required to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard (1) to cause the borrower to maintain (to the extent required by the related Mortgage Loan documents), and (2) if the borrower does not so maintain, to itself maintain to the extent the trustee, as mortgagee, has an insurable interest in the Mortgaged Property and such insurance is available at commercially reasonable rates (as determined by the master servicer in accordance with the Servicing Standard but only to the extent that the related Mortgage Loan permits the lender to
442
require the coverage) a flood insurance policy in an amount representing coverage not less than the lesser of (x) the outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) and (y) the maximum amount of insurance which is available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, plus such additional excess flood coverage with respect to the Mortgaged Property, if any, in an amount consistent with the Servicing Standard.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan that either (x) require the borrower to maintain “all-risk” property insurance (and do not expressly permit an exclusion for terrorism) or (y) contain provisions generally requiring the applicable borrower to maintain insurance in types and against such risks as the holder of such Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan reasonably requires from time to time in order to protect its interests, the master servicer will be required to, consistent with the Servicing Standard, (A) monitor in accordance with the Servicing Standard whether the insurance policies for the related Mortgaged Property contain exclusions in addition to those customarily found in insurance policies for mortgaged properties similar to the Mortgaged Properties on or prior to September 11, 2001 (“Additional Exclusions”) (provided that the master servicer and the special servicer will be entitled to conclusively rely upon certificates of insurance in determining whether such policies contain Additional Exclusions), (B) request the borrower to either purchase insurance against the risks specified in the Additional Exclusions or provide an explanation as to its reasons for failing to purchase such insurance, and (C) if the related Mortgage Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan, notify the special servicer if it has knowledge that any insurance policy contains Additional Exclusions or if it has knowledge that any borrower fails to purchase the insurance requested to be purchased by the master servicer pursuant to clause (B) above. If the master servicer determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that such failure is not an Acceptable Insurance Default, the master servicer will be required to notify the special servicer and the master servicer will be required to use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to cause such insurance to be maintained. If the master servicer determines that such failure is an Acceptable Insurance Default, it will be required to promptly deliver such conclusions in writing to the 17g-5 Information Provider for posting to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website for those Mortgage Loans that (i) have one of the 10 highest outstanding principal balances of the Mortgage Loans then included in the issuing entity or (ii) comprise more than 5% of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loans then included in the issuing entity.
“Acceptable Insurance Default” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, a default under the related Mortgage Loan documents arising by reason of (i) any failure on the part of the related borrower to maintain with respect to the related Mortgaged Property specific insurance coverage with respect to, or an all-risk casualty insurance policy that does not specifically exclude, terrorist or similar acts, and/or (ii) any failure on the part of the related borrower to maintain with respect to the related Mortgaged Property insurance coverage with respect to damages or casualties caused by terrorist or similar acts upon terms not materially less favorable than those in place as of the Closing Date, in each case, as to which default the master servicer and the special servicer may forbear taking any enforcement action; provided that, subject to the consent or consultation rights of the Directing Certificateholder or the holder of any Companion Loan as described under “—The Directing Certificateholder—Major Decisions” and “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments”, the master servicer has determined in its reasonable judgment based on inquiry consistent with the Servicing Standard that either (a) such insurance is not available at commercially reasonable rates and that such hazards are not at the time commonly insured against for properties similar
443
to the related Mortgaged Property and located in or around the region in which such related Mortgaged Property is located, or (b) such insurance is not available at any rate.
During the period that the master servicer is evaluating the availability of such insurance, or waiting for a response from the Directing Certificateholder, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be liable for any loss related to its failure to require the borrower to maintain (or its failure to maintain) such insurance and neither will be in default of its obligations as a result of such failure.
The special servicer will be required to maintain (or cause to be maintained) fire and hazard insurance on each REO Property (other than any REO Property with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) for which it is acting as special servicer, to the extent obtainable at commercially reasonable rates and the trustee has an insurable interest, in an amount that is at least equal to the lesser of (1) the full replacement cost of the improvements on the REO Property, and (2) the outstanding principal balance owing on the related Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or REO Loan, as applicable, and in any event, the amount necessary to avoid the operation of any co-insurance provisions. In addition, if the REO Property is located in an area identified as a federally designated special flood hazard area, the special servicer will be required to cause to be maintained, to the extent available at commercially reasonable rates as determined by the special servicer (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder (other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan)) in accordance with the Servicing Standard), a flood insurance policy meeting the requirements of the current guidelines of the Federal Insurance Administration in an amount representing coverage not less than the maximum amount of insurance that is available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, plus such additional excess flood insurance with respect to the Mortgaged Property, if any, in an amount consistent with the Servicing Standard.
The PSA provides that the master servicer may satisfy its obligation to cause each borrower to maintain a hazard insurance policy and the master servicer or special servicer may satisfy its obligation to maintain hazard insurance by maintaining a blanket or master single interest or force-placed policy insuring against hazard losses on the Mortgage Loans and related Serviced Companion Loan and REO Properties (other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Whole Loan), as applicable. Any losses incurred with respect to Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) or REO Properties due to uninsured risks (including earthquakes, mudflows and floods) or insufficient hazard insurance proceeds may adversely affect payments to Certificateholders. Any cost incurred by the master servicer or special servicer in maintaining a hazard insurance policy, if the borrower defaults on its obligation to do so, will be advanced by the master servicer as a Servicing Advance and will be charged to the related borrower. Generally, no borrower is required by the Mortgage Loan documents to maintain earthquake insurance on any Mortgaged Property and the special servicer will not be required to maintain earthquake insurance on any REO Properties. Any cost of maintaining that kind of required insurance or other earthquake insurance obtained by the special servicer will be paid out of the REO Account or advanced by the master servicer as a Servicing Advance.
The costs of the insurance may be recovered by the master servicer or the trustee, as the case may be, from reimbursements received from the borrower or, if the borrower does not pay those amounts, as a Servicing Advance as set forth in the PSA. All costs and expenses incurred by the special servicer in maintaining the insurance described above on REO Properties will be paid out of the related REO Account or, if the amount in such account is insufficient, such costs and expenses will be advanced by the master servicer to the
444
special servicer as a Servicing Advance to the extent that such Servicing Advance is not determined to be a Nonrecoverable Advance.
No pool insurance policy, special hazard insurance policy, bankruptcy bond, repurchase bond or certificate guarantee insurance will be maintained with respect to the Mortgage Loans, nor will any Mortgage Loan be subject to FHA insurance.
Modifications, Waivers and Amendments
Subject to the immediately succeeding paragraph, (i) the special servicer will be responsible for processing waivers, modifications, amendments and consents with respect to (a) any Specially Serviced Loan and (b) any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan with respect to which the matter involves a Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision”, which the master servicer will process with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, subject to special servicer consent or deemed consent as provided in the PSA) or a Special Servicer Major Decision, and (ii) the master servicer will be responsible for processing waivers, modifications, amendments and consents with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan and does not involve a Special Servicer Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision”, which the master servicer will process, subject to special servicer consent or deemed consent as provided in the PSA); provided that, except as otherwise set forth in this paragraph, neither the special servicer nor the master servicer may permit the substitution of any Mortgaged Property (or portion thereof) for one or more other parcels of real property with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is not in default or as to which default is not reasonably foreseeable except for (1) the waiver of any due-on-sale clause or due-on-encumbrance clause to the extent permitted in the PSA, and (2) any waiver, modification or amendment more than three months after the Closing Date that would not be a “significant modification” of the Mortgage Loan and/or Serviced Companion Loan within the meaning of Treasury regulations Section 1.860G-2(b) or otherwise cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or result in the imposition of a tax upon any Trust REMIC or the issuing entity. Subject to the immediately succeeding paragraph, the master servicer will not be permitted under the PSA to agree to any modifications, waivers and amendments that constitute Special Servicer Major Decisions without the consent of the special servicer (which consent may be deemed received by the master servicer if the special servicer does not respond within 10 business days of delivery to the special servicer of the analysis and all information in the master servicer’s possession that is reasonably requested by the special servicer in order to grant or withhold such consent, plus, if applicable, any time provided to the Directing Certificateholder or other relevant party under the PSA and, if applicable, any time period provided to a holder of a Companion Loan under a related Intercreditor Agreement), except certain non-material consents and waivers described in the PSA and as permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents.
With respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, the master servicer, prior to taking any action with respect to any Special Servicer Major Decision (or making a determination not to take action with respect to a Special Servicer Major Decision) and prior to taking any action with respect to any Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision”) (or making a determination not to take action with respect to the Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision”)), will be required to refer any request with respect to such Special Servicer
445
Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision to the special servicer, which will process the request directly, or if mutually agreed to by the special servicer and the master servicer, the master servicer will be required to process such request, and if the master servicer processes such request and is recommending approval of such request, the master servicer will be required to prepare and submit its written analysis and recommendation to the special servicer with all information in the possession of the master servicer that the special servicer may reasonably request in order to withhold or grant its consent, and in all cases the special servicer will be entitled (subject to the discussion under “—The Directing Certificateholder” below) to approve or disapprove any modification, waiver, amendment or other action that constitutes a Special Servicer Major Decision or a Special Servicer Non-Major Decision. In addition, the master servicer will be required to provide the special servicer with any notice that it receives relating to a default by the borrower under a ground lease where all or any portion of the collateral for the Mortgage Loan is the ground lease, and the special servicer will determine (subject to the discussion under “—The Directing Certificateholder” below) in accordance with the Servicing Standard whether the Special Servicer, on behalf of the issuing entity as lender, should cure any borrower defaults relating to ground leases. Any costs relating to any such cure of a borrower default relating to a ground lease shall be paid by the master servicer as a Servicing Advance.
If the special servicer determines that a modification, waiver or amendment (including the forgiveness or deferral of interest or principal or the substitution or release of collateral or the pledge of additional collateral) of the terms of a Specially Serviced Loan with respect to which a payment default or other material default has occurred or a payment default or other material default is, in the special servicer’s judgment, reasonably foreseeable, is reasonably likely to produce a greater (or equivalent) recovery on a net present value basis (the relevant discounting to be performed at the related Mortgage Rate) to the issuing entity and, if applicable, the holders of any applicable Companion Loan, than liquidation of such Specially Serviced Loan, then the special servicer may, but is not required to, agree to a modification, waiver or amendment of the Specially Serviced Loan, subject to (x) the restrictions and limitations described below, (y) with respect to any Major Decision, other than with respect to any Excluded Loan, the approval of the Directing Certificateholder (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event or after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, upon consultation with the Directing Certificateholder) as provided in the PSA and described in this prospectus and (z) with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the rights of the holder of the related Companion Loan, as applicable, to advise or consult with the special servicer with respect to, or consent to, such modification, waiver or amendment, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the related intercreditor agreement and, with respect to a Mortgage Loan that has mezzanine debt, the rights of the mezzanine lender to consent to such modification, waiver or amendment, in each case, pursuant to the terms of the related intercreditor agreement.
In connection with (i) the release of a Mortgaged Property (other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Whole Loan) or any portion of such a Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related Mortgage or (ii) the taking of a Mortgaged Property (other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Whole Loan) or any portion of such a Mortgaged Property by exercise of the power of eminent domain or condemnation, if the related Mortgage Loan documents require the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, to calculate (or to approve the calculation of the related borrower of) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties or the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, for purposes of REMIC qualification of the related Mortgage Loan, then such calculation will, unless then permitted by the REMIC provisions, exclude the value
446
of personal property and going concern value, if any, as determined by an appropriate third party.
The special servicer is required to use its reasonable efforts to the extent reasonably possible to fully amortize a modified Mortgage Loan prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date. The special servicer may not agree to a modification, waiver or amendment if that modification, waiver or amendment would:
(1) extend the maturity date of the Specially Serviced Loan to a date occurring later than the earlier of (A) 5 years prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date and (B) if the Specially Serviced Loan is secured solely or primarily by a leasehold estate and not the related fee interest, the date occurring 20 years or, to the extent consistent with the Servicing Standard giving due consideration to the remaining term of the ground lease and, other than with respect to any Excluded Loan prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder, 10 years, prior to the end of the current term of the ground lease, plus any options to extend exercisable unilaterally by the borrower; or
(2) provide for the deferral of interest unless interest accrues on the Mortgage Loan or any Serviced Whole Loan, generally, at the related Mortgage Rate.
If the special servicer agrees to any modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Whole Loan) or related Companion Loan, the special servicer will be required to notify the master servicer, the holder of any related Serviced Companion Loan (or, to the extent the related Serviced Companion Loan has been included in a securitization transaction, to the master servicer of such securitization transaction), the related mortgage loan seller (so long as such mortgage loan seller is not the master servicer or sub-servicer of such Mortgage Loan or the Directing Certificateholder), the operating advisor (after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event), the certificate administrator, the trustee, the Directing Certificateholder (other than with respect to any Excluded Loan, and unless a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) and the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will thereafter post any such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website. If the master servicer agrees to any modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any such Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan, the master servicer will be required to notify the certificate administrator, the trustee, the special servicer (and the special servicer will forward such notice to the Directing Certificateholder (other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan, and unless a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing)), the related mortgage loan seller (so long as such mortgage loan seller is not the master servicer or sub-servicer of such Mortgage Loan or the Directing Certificateholder), the holder of any related Serviced Companion Loan (or, to the extent the related Serviced Companion Loan has been included in a securitization transaction, the master servicer of such securitization transaction) and the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will be required to thereafter post any such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website. The party providing notice will be required to deliver to the custodian for deposit in the related Mortgage File, an original counterpart of the agreement related to the modification, waiver or amendment, promptly following the execution of that agreement, and if required, a copy to the master servicer and to the holder of any related Serviced Companion Loan, all as set forth in the PSA. Copies of each agreement whereby the modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan is effected are required to be available for review during normal business hours at the offices of the custodian. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”.
447
The modification, waiver or amendment of a Serviced Whole Loan or a Mortgage Loan that has a related mezzanine loan will be subject to certain limitations set forth in the related intercreditor agreement. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Indebtedness Entails Risk”.
“Special Servicer Non-Major Decision” means each of the following to the extent such actions do not constitute Major Decisions:
(i) approving any waiver regarding the receipt of financial statements (other than immaterial timing waivers);
(ii) agreeing to any modification, waiver, consent or amendment of the related Mortgage Loan in connection with a defeasance if such proposed modification, waiver, consent or amendment is with respect to (A) a waiver of a mortgage loan event of default (but excluding non-monetary events of default other than defaults relating to transfers of interests in the borrower or the existing collateral or material modifications of the existing collateral), (B) a modification of the type of defeasance collateral required under the related Mortgage Loan documents such that defeasance collateral other than direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America would be permitted, or (C) a modification that would permit a principal prepayment instead of defeasance if the related Mortgage Loan documents do not otherwise permit such principal prepayment; provided that the foregoing is not otherwise a Major Decision or another Special Servicer Non-Major Decision;
(iii) any requests for the funding or disbursement of amounts from any escrow accounts, reserve funds or letters of credit held, as “performance”, “earn-out”, “holdback” or similar escrows or reserves with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, but excluding (subject to clause (vi) below) as to Mortgage Loans or Serviced Whole Loan which are non-Specially Serviced Loans, (A) any routine and/or customary escrow and reserve fundings or disbursements for which the satisfaction of performance-related criteria or lender discretion is not required or permitted pursuant to the terms of the related loan documents, (B) any request with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan that is a non-Specially Serviced Loan for the funding or disbursement of ordinary course impounds, repair and replacement reserves, lender approved budget and operating expenses, and tenant improvements pursuant to an approved lease, each in accordance with the loan documents or (C) any other funding or disbursement as mutually agreed upon by the master servicer and special servicer;
(iv) any requests for the funding or disbursement of amounts from any escrow accounts, reserve funds or letters of credit in the case of certain Mortgage Loans whose escrows, reserves, holdbacks and related letters of credit exceed, in the aggregate (but excluding tax and insurance escrows), at the related origination date, 10% of the initial principal balance of such Mortgage Loan (which Mortgage Loans are identified on a schedule to the PSA), except for the routine funding of tax payments and insurance premiums when due and payable (provided the Mortgage Loan is not a Specially Serviced Loan; provided that the foregoing is not otherwise a Major Decision);
(v) in circumstances where no lender discretion is permitted other than confirming that the conditions in the related Mortgage Loan documents have been satisfied (including determining whether any applicable terms or tests are
448
satisfied), any request to incur additional debt in accordance with the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents; and
(vi) in circumstances where no lender discretion is required other than confirming the satisfaction of the applicable terms of the Mortgage Loan documents (including determining whether any applicable terms or tests are satisfied), processing requests for any release of collateral or any acceptance of substitute or additional collateral for a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan; provided that, in any case, Special Servicer Non-Major Decisions will not include (i) the release, substitution or addition of collateral securing any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan in connection with a defeasance of such collateral; or (ii) requests that are related to any condemnation action that is pending, or threatened in writing, and would affect a non-material portion of the Mortgaged Property; provided that such release or substitution or addition of collateral is not otherwise a Major Decision;
provided, however, that with respect to clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of this definition, the master servicer will be required to process such request with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans and obtain the consent or deemed consent of the special servicer as provided in the PSA.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the master servicer and the special servicer may mutually agree as contemplated in the PSA that the master servicer will process any of the foregoing matters with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan that is a non-Specially Serviced Loan in accordance with the terms and conditions reasonably agreed to by the master servicer and the special servicer, including the special servicer’s consent. If the master servicer and special servicer mutually agree that the master servicer will process a Special Servicer Non-Major Decision with respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan that is a non-Specially Serviced Loan, the Master Servicer will be required to obtain the special servicer’s prior consent (or deemed consent) to the Special Servicer Non-Major Decision.
Enforcement of “Due-on-Sale” and “Due-on-Encumbrance” Provisions
The special servicer will be required to determine (with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan or, to the extent such action is a Special Servicer Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision”), with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan) and the master servicer will be required to determine (with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), to the extent such action is not a Special Servicer Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision” which items the master servicer will be required to determine)), in each case, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard, whether to (a) exercise any right it may have with respect to such Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Companion Loan containing a “due-on-sale” clause (1) to accelerate the payments on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, or (2) to grant or withhold its consent to any sale or transfer, consistent with the Servicing Standard or to (b) waive its right to exercise such rights; provided, however, that (i) with respect to such consent or waiver of rights that is a Major Decision, (x) prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event and other than with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, has obtained the prior written consent (or
449
deemed consent) of the Directing Certificateholder (or after the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, but prior to a Consultation Termination Event and other than with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan, upon consultation with the Directing Certificateholder), which consent or consultation will be deemed given 10 Business Days after receipt of the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s written recommendation and analysis with respect to such waiver or exercise of such rights together with such other information reasonably required by the Directing Certificateholder (unless earlier objected to by the Directing Certificateholder), and (y) after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the special servicer has consulted with the operating advisor and (ii) with respect to any Mortgage Loan that (A) represents at least 5.0% of the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans then outstanding and has a Stated Principal Balance of at least $10,000,000, (B) represents one of the 10 largest Mortgage Loans based on Stated Principal Balance and has a Stated Principal Balance of at least $10,000,000, (C) has a Stated Principal Balance that is more than $35,000,000, or (D) is a Mortgage Loan as to which the related Serviced Companion Loan represents one of the 10 largest mortgage loans in the related other securitization (provided that the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will be entitled to reasonably rely upon the written notification provided by the master servicer, special servicer, trustee or certificate administrator of such other securitization as to whether such Serviced Companion Loan is one of the 10 largest mortgage loans in such other securitization, or if no timely response is received, permitted to rely upon the most recent CREFC® Reports from such other securitization), a Rating Agency Confirmation is received by the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, from each Rating Agency and a confirmation of any applicable rating agency that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (if any).
The special servicer will be required to determine (with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan or, to the extent such action is a Special Servicer Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision”), with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan with a “due-on-encumbrance” clause) and the master servicer will be required to determine (with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), to the extent such action is not a Special Servicer Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision (other than the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision” which items the master servicer will be required to determine)), in each case, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard, whether to (a) exercise any right it may have with respect to such Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Companion Loan containing a “due-on-encumbrance” clause (1) to accelerate the payments thereon, or (2) to grant or withhold its consent to the creation of any additional lien or other encumbrance, consistent with the Servicing Standard or to (b) waive its right to exercise such rights, provided, however, (i) with respect to such consent or waiver of rights that is a Major Decision, (x) prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event and other than with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, has obtained the prior written consent (or deemed consent) of the Directing Certificateholder (or after the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, but prior to a Consultation Termination Event and other than with respect to an applicable Excluded Loan, upon consultation with the Directing Certificateholder), which consent or consultation will be deemed given 10 Business Days after receipt of the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s written recommendation and analysis with respect to such waiver or exercise of such rights together with such other information reasonably required by the Directing
450
Certificateholder (unless earlier objected to by the Directing Certificateholder), and (y) after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the special servicer will consult with the operating advisor pursuant to the PSA, and (ii) with respect to any Mortgage Loan that (A) represents at least 2.0% of the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans then outstanding and has a Stated Principal Balance of at least $10,000,000, (B) represents one of the 10 largest Mortgage Loans based on Stated Principal Balance and has a Stated Principal Balance of at least $10,000,000, (C) has a Stated Principal Balance that is more than $20,000,000, (D) has a loan-to-value ratio that is equal to or greater than 85% (including any existing and proposed debt) and has a Stated Principal Balance of at least $10,000,000, (E) has a debt service coverage ratio that is less than 1.20x (in each case, determined based upon the aggregate of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Whole Loan, if applicable) and the principal amount of the proposed additional lien) and has a Stated Principal Balance of at least $10,000,000, or (F) is a Mortgage Loan as to which the related Serviced Companion Loan represents one of the 10 largest mortgage loans in the related other securitization (provided that the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will be entitled to reasonably rely upon the written notification provided by the master servicer, special servicer, trustee or certificate administrator of such other securitization as to whether such Serviced Companion Loan is one of the 10 largest mortgage loans in such other securitization, or if no timely response is received, permitted to rely upon the most recent CREFC® Reports from such other securitization), a Rating Agency Confirmation is received by the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, from each Rating Agency and a confirmation of any applicable rating agency that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (if any).
With respect to any matter described in the preceding two paragraphs, with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) as to which such action is a Special Servicer Major Decision or Special Servicer Non-Major Decision, the special servicer and the master servicer may mutually agree that the master servicer will process such action in accordance with the terms and conditions reasonably agreed to by the master servicer and the special servicer, including the special servicer’s consent and subject to the rights of the Directing Certificateholder discussed under “—The Directing Certificateholder”; provided, however, that with respect to clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of this definition, the master servicer will be required to process such request with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans (other than Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans) and obtain the consent or deemed consent of the special servicer as provided in the PSA.
It is expected that any modification, extension, waiver or amendment of the payment terms of a Non-Serviced Whole Loan will be required to be structured so as to be consistent with the servicing standard under the related Non-Serviced PSA and the allocation and payment priorities in the related Mortgage Loan documents and the related Intercreditor Agreement, such that neither the issuing entity as holder of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan nor any holder of the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan gains a priority over the other holder that is not reflected in the related Mortgage Loan documents and the related Intercreditor Agreement.
Inspections
The master servicer will be required to perform (at its own expense) or cause to be performed (at its own expense) physical inspections of each Mortgaged Property relating to a Mortgage Loan (other than a Mortgaged Property securing a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, which is subject to inspection pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA, and other than a
451
Specially Serviced Loan) with a Stated Principal Balance of (A) $2,000,000 or more at least once every 12 months and (B) less than $2,000,000 at least once every 24 months, in each case commencing in the calendar year 2018 unless a physical inspection has been performed by the special servicer within the previous 12 months; provided, further, however, that if any scheduled payment becomes more than 60 days delinquent on the related Mortgage Loan, the special servicer is required to inspect or cause to be inspected the related Mortgaged Property as soon as practicable after the Mortgage Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan and annually thereafter for so long as the Mortgage Loan remains a Specially Serviced Loan (the cost of which inspection, to the extent not paid by the related borrower, will be reimbursed first from default interest and late charges constituting additional compensation of the special servicer on the related Mortgage Loan (but with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, only amounts available for such purpose under the related Intercreditor Agreement) and then from the Collection Account as an expense of the issuing entity, and in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan, as an expense of the holders of the related Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan and Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, pro rata and pari passu, to the extent provided in the related Intercreditor Agreement. The special servicer or master servicer, as applicable, will be required to prepare or cause to be prepared a written report of the inspection describing, among other things, the condition of and any damage to the Mortgaged Property to the extent evident from the inspection and specifying the existence of any vacancies at the Mortgaged Property of which the preparer of such report has knowledge and the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, deems material, of any sale, transfer or abandonment of the Mortgaged Property of which the preparer of such report has knowledge or that is evident from the inspection, of any adverse change in the condition of the Mortgaged Property of which the preparer of such report has knowledge or that is evident from the inspection, and that the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, deems material, or of any material waste committed on the Mortgaged Property of which the preparer of such report has knowledge or to the extent evident from the inspection.
Copies of the inspection reports referred to above that are delivered to the certificate administrator will be posted to the certificate administrator’s website for review by Privileged Persons pursuant to the PSA. See “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”.
Collection of Operating Information
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), the special servicer or the master servicer, as applicable, will be required to use reasonable efforts to collect and review quarterly and annual operating statements, financial statements, budgets and rent rolls of the related Mortgaged Property commencing with the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2018 and the calendar year ending on December 31, 2018. Most of the Mortgage Loan documents obligate the related borrower to deliver annual property operating statements. However, we cannot assure you that any operating statements required to be delivered will in fact be delivered, nor is the special servicer or the master servicer likely to have any practical means of compelling the delivery in the case of an otherwise performing Mortgage Loan. In addition, the special servicer will be required to cause quarterly and annual operating statements, budgets and rent rolls to be regularly prepared in respect of each REO Property and to collect all such items promptly following their preparation.
452
Special Servicing Transfer Event
The Mortgage Loans (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan), any related Companion Loan and any related REO Properties will be serviced by the special servicer under the PSA in the event that the servicing responsibilities of the master servicer are transferred to the special servicer as described below. Such Mortgage Loans and related Companion Loan (including those loans that have become REO Properties) serviced by the special servicer are referred to in this prospectus collectively as the “Specially Serviced Loans”. The master servicer will be required to transfer its servicing responsibilities to the special servicer with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any related Companion Loan) for which the master servicer is responsible for servicing if:
(1) as to which a payment default has occurred at its original maturity date, or, if the original maturity date has been extended, at its extended maturity date; and in the case of a balloon payment, if the balloon payment is delinquent and the related borrower has not provided the master servicer (and the master servicer will promptly forward a copy of such document to the special servicer), within 60 days after the related maturity date, with a written and fully executed (subject only to customary final closing conditions) commitment, letter of intent, or otherwise binding application for refinancing or similar document that is, in each case, binding upon an acceptable lender or signed purchase agreement reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the master servicer (and the master servicer will promptly forward a copy of such document to the special servicer, if it is not evident that a copy has been delivered to such other party), which provides that such refinancing or purchase will occur within 120 days of such related maturity date, provided that such Mortgage Loan and any related Companion Loan will become a Specially Serviced Loan immediately if the related borrower fails to diligently pursue such financing or to pay any Assumed Scheduled Payment on the related due date (subject to any applicable grace period) at any time before the refinancing or, if such refinancing does not occur, such Mortgage Loan and any related Companion Loan at the end of such 120-day period (or for such shorter period beyond the date on which the related balloon payment was due within which the refinancing is scheduled to occur pursuant to the commitment for refinancing or on which such commitment terminates);
(2) as to which any Periodic Payment is more than 60 days delinquent;
(3) as to which (i) the borrower has entered into or consented to bankruptcy, appointment of a receiver or conservator or a similar insolvency proceeding, (ii) the borrower has become the subject of a decree or order for that proceeding and it has not been stayed or discharged or dismissed within 60 days (or a shorter period if the master servicer or the special servicer (and, in the case of the special servicer, with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder, unless a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that the circumstances warrant that the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (or REO Loan) be transferred to special servicing), or (iii) the related borrower has admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations;
(4) as to which the master servicer or special servicer has received notice of the commencement of foreclosure or foreclosure or proposed foreclosure or similar proceedings of any lien other than the Mortgage on the Mortgaged Property;
(5) as to which, in the judgment of the master servicer, a payment default is imminent or reasonably foreseeable and is not likely to be cured by the borrower within 30 days;
453
(6) as to which a default that the master servicer or special servicer has notice (other than a failure by the related borrower to pay principal or interest) and which the master servicer determines, in its good faith reasonable judgment, may materially and adversely affect the interests of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to any Whole Loan, the holders of any related Companion Loan, as a collective whole (taking into account the subordinate or pari passu or subordinate nature of any Companion Loan, as applicable)), has occurred and remains unremediated for the applicable grace period specified in the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan documents, other than in certain circumstances the failure to maintain terrorism insurance (or if no grace period is specified for events of default that are capable of cure, 30 days); or
(7) as to which the master servicer determines that (i) a default (other than as described in clause (5) above) under the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan is imminent or reasonably foreseeable, (ii) such default will materially impair the value of the corresponding Mortgaged Property as security for the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan or otherwise materially adversely affect the interests of Certificateholders (and, with respect to a Whole Loan, the holders of any related Companion Loan as a collective whole (taking into account the pari passu or subordinate nature of any Companion Loans)), and (iii) the default will continue unremedied for the applicable cure period under the terms of the Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan, or, if no cure period is specified and the default is capable of being cured, for 30 days (provided that such 30-day grace period does not apply to a default that gives rise to immediate acceleration without application of a grace period under the terms of the Mortgage Loan or related Serviced Companion Loan, as applicable; provided that, any determination that a special servicing transfer event has occurred under this clause (7) with respect to any Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan solely by reason of the failure (or imminent failure) of the related borrower to maintain or cause to be maintained insurance coverage against damages or losses arising from acts of terrorism may only be made by the master servicer (and with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an applicable Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence and continuance of any Control Termination Event, with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder)) as described under “—Maintenance of Insurance” above.
However, the master servicer will be required to continue to (x) receive payments on the Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) (including amounts collected by the special servicer), (y) make certain calculations with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan and (z) make remittances and prepare certain reports to the Certificateholders with respect to the Mortgage Loans and any related Serviced Companion Loan. Additionally, the master servicer will continue to receive the Servicing Fee in respect of the Mortgage Loans (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) at the Servicing Fee Rate. Prior to a Consultation Termination Event, promptly upon a determination by the master servicer pursuant to clauses (5), (6) or (7) above, the master servicer will notify the Directing Certificateholder of such determination.
If the related Mortgaged Property is acquired in respect of any Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Companion Loan) (upon acquisition, an “REO Property”) whether through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, the special servicer will continue to be responsible for its operation and management. If any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan becomes specially serviced, then the related Mortgage Loan will also become a Specially Serviced Loan. If any Mortgage Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan, then the related Serviced Companion Loan will also become a Specially Serviced Loan. Neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have any responsibility for the performance by such other party of its duties under the PSA. Any Mortgage Loan (excluding any Non-Serviced
454
Mortgage Loan) that is or becomes a cross-collateralized Mortgage Loan and is cross-collateralized with a Specially Serviced Loan will become a Specially Serviced Loan.
If any Specially Serviced Loan, in accordance with its original terms or as modified in accordance with the PSA, becomes performing for at least 3 consecutive Periodic Payments (provided that no additional event of default is foreseeable in the reasonable judgment of the special servicer and no other event or circumstance exists that causes such Mortgage Loan or related Companion Loan to otherwise constitute a Specially Serviced Loan), the special servicer will be required to transfer servicing of such Specially Serviced Loan (a “Corrected Loan”) to the master servicer.
Asset Status Report
The special servicer will be required to prepare a report (an “Asset Status Report”) for each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and, if applicable, any Serviced Whole Loan that becomes a Specially Serviced Loan not later than 60 days after the servicing of such Mortgage Loan is transferred to the special servicer (the “Initial Delivery Date”) and will be required to amend, update or create a new Asset Status Report to the extent that during the course of the resolution of such Specially Serviced Loan material changes in the circumstances and strategy reflected in any current Final Asset Status Report are necessary to reflect the then current circumstances and recommendation as to how the Specially Serviced Loan might be returned to performing status or otherwise liquidated in accordance with the Servicing Standard (each such report a “Subsequent Asset Status Report”). Each Final Asset Status Report will be required to be delivered in electronic form to:
● | the Directing Certificateholder (but only prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event and with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan); |
● | with respect to any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or, to the extent the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan has been included in a securitization transaction, the master servicer of such securitization into which the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan has been sold; |
● | the operating advisor (but, other than with respect to an Excluded Loan, only after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event); |
● | the master servicer; and |
● | the 17g-5 Information Provider, which will be required to post such report to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website. |
A summary of each Final Asset Status Report will be provided to the certificate administrator and the certificate administrator will be required to post the summary of the Final Asset Status Report to the certificate administrator’s website.
An Asset Status Report prepared for each Specially Serviced Loan will be required to include, among other things, the following information:
● | a summary of the status of such Specially Serviced Loan and any negotiations with the related borrower; |
455
● | a discussion of the legal and environmental considerations reasonably known to the special servicer, consistent with the Servicing Standard, that are applicable to the exercise of remedies and to the enforcement of any related guaranties or other collateral for the related Specially Serviced Loan and whether outside legal counsel has been retained; |
● | the most current rent roll and income or operating statement available for the related Mortgaged Property; |
● | (A) the special servicer’s recommendations on how such Specially Serviced Loan might be returned to performing status (including the modification of a monetary term, and any workout, restructure or debt forgiveness) and returned to the master servicer for regular servicing or foreclosed or otherwise realized upon (including any proposed sale of a Defaulted Loan or REO Property), (B) a description of any such proposed or taken actions, and (C) the alternative courses of action that were or are being considered by the special servicer in connection with the proposed or taken actions; |
● | the status of any foreclosure actions or other proceedings undertaken with respect to the Specially Serviced Loan, any proposed workouts and the status of any negotiations with respect to such workouts, and an assessment of the likelihood of additional defaults under the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan; |
● | a description of any amendment, modification or waiver of a material term of any ground lease (or any space lease or air rights lease, if applicable) or franchise agreement; |
● | the decision that the special servicer made, or intends or proposes to make, including a narrative analysis setting forth the special servicer’s rationale for its proposed decision, including its rejection of the alternatives; |
● | an analysis of whether or not taking such proposed action is reasonably likely to produce a greater recovery on a present value basis than not taking such action, setting forth (x) the basis on which the special servicer made such determination and (y) the net present value calculation and all related assumptions; |
● | the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property (and a copy of the last obtained appraisal of such Mortgaged Property) together with a description of any adjustments to the valuation of such Mortgaged Property made by the special servicer together with an explanation of those adjustments; and |
● | such other information as the special servicer deems relevant in light of the Servicing Standard. |
With respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan, if no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder will have the right to disapprove the Asset Status Report prepared by the special servicer with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan within 10 business days after receipt of the Asset Status Report. If the Directing Certificateholder does not disapprove an Asset Status Report within 10 business days or if the special servicer makes a determination, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that the disapproval by the Directing Certificateholder (communicated to the special servicer within 10 business days) is not in the best interest of all the Certificateholders and the holder of any related Companion Loan, as a collective whole, the special servicer will be required to implement the recommended action as
456
outlined in the Asset Status Report. If the Directing Certificateholder disapproves the Asset Status Report within the 10 business day period and the special servicer has not made the affirmative determination described above, the special servicer will be required to revise the Asset Status Report as soon as practicable thereafter, but in no event later than 30 days after the disapproval. The special servicer will be required to continue to revise the Asset Status Report until the Directing Certificateholder fails to disapprove the revised Asset Status Report or until the special servicer makes a determination, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that the disapproval is not in the best interests of the Certificateholders and the holder of any related Companion Loan, as a collective whole; provided that, if the Directing Certificateholder or the Controlling Holder, as applicable, has not approved the Asset Status Report for a period of 60 business days following the first submission of an Asset Status Report, the special servicer may act upon the most recently submitted form of Asset Status Report, if consistent with the Servicing Standard; provided, however, that if the direction of the Directing Certificateholder or the Controlling Holder, as applicable, would cause the special servicer to violate the Servicing Standard, the special servicer may act upon the most recently submitted form of Asset Status Report. The procedures described in this paragraph are collectively referred to as the “Directing Holder Approval Process”.
A “Final Asset Status Report” means, with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan, the initial Asset Status Report (together with such other data or supporting information provided by the special servicer to the Directing Certificateholder or the Controlling Holder with respect to an AB Whole Loan that does not include any communication (other than the related Asset Status Report) between the special servicer and the Directing Certificateholder or between the special servicer and the Controlling Holder with respect to an AB Whole Loan with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan) required to be delivered by the special servicer by the Initial Delivery Date and any Subsequent Asset Status Report, in each case, in the form fully approved or deemed approved, if applicable, by the Directing Certificateholder pursuant to the Directing Holder Approval Process or following completion of the ASR Consultation Process, as applicable, or by the Controlling Holder with respect to an AB Whole Loan (to the extent required by the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement). For the avoidance of doubt, the special servicer may issue more than one Final Asset Status Report with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan in accordance with the procedures described above.
Prior to an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the special servicer will be required to deliver each Final Asset Status Report to the operating advisor following completion of the Directing Holder Approval Process. See “—The Directing Certificateholder—Major Decisions—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” below for a discussion of the operating advisor’s ability to ask the special servicer reasonable questions with respect to such Final Asset Status Report.
If an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, the special servicer will be required to deliver each Asset Status Report prepared in connection with a Specially Serviced Loan to the operating advisor and, other than with respect to any Excluded Loan and for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred, the Directing Certificateholder. The operating advisor will be required to provide comments to the special servicer in respect of each Asset Status Report, if any, within 10 business days following the later of receipt of (i) such Asset Status Report or (ii) such related additional information reasonably requested by the operating advisor, and propose possible alternative courses of action to the extent it determines such alternatives to be in the best interest of the Certificateholders (including any Certificateholders that are holders of the Control Eligible Certificates), as a collective whole. The special servicer will be obligated to consider such alternative courses of action and any other feedback provided by the operating advisor
457
(and the Directing Certificateholder (if no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan)) in connection with the special servicer’s preparation of any Asset Status Report. The special servicer may revise the Asset Status Report as it deems necessary to take into account any input and/or comments from the operating advisor and the Directing Certificateholder (if no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan), to the extent the special servicer determines that the operating advisor’s and/or Directing Certificateholder’s input and/or recommendations are consistent with the Servicing Standard and in the best interest of the Certificateholders as a collective whole (or, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the best interest of the Certificateholders and the holders of the related Companion Loan, as a collective whole (taking into account the pari passu nature of such Companion Loan)). Upon determining whether or not to revise any Asset Status Report to take into account any input and/or comments from the operating advisor or the Directing Certificateholder, the special servicer will be required to revise the Asset Status Report, if applicable, and deliver to the operating advisor and the Directing Certificateholder the revised Asset Status Report (until a Final Asset Status Report is issued). The procedures described in this paragraph are collectively referred to as the “ASR Consultation Process”. For additional information, see “—The Operating Advisor—Additional Duties of Operating Advisor While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event Has Occurred and Is Continuing”.
The special servicer will not be required to take or to refrain from taking any action because of an objection or comment by the operating advisor or a recommendation of the operating advisor.
After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, each of the Directing Certificateholder (other than with respect to an Excluded Loan) and the operating advisor will be entitled to consult (in the case of the operating advisor, the operating advisor will be deemed to have consulted with the special servicer if the operating advisor does not respond within 10 business days following the later of (i) the operating advisor’s receipt of the Asset Status Report and (ii) delivery of all such additional information reasonably requested by the operating advisor related to the subject matter of such consultation) with the special servicer and propose alternative courses of action and provide other feedback in respect of any Asset Status Report. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder will not have any right to consult with the special servicer with respect to Asset Status Reports and the special servicer will only be obligated to consult with the operating advisor with respect to any Asset Status Report as described above. The special servicer may choose to revise the Asset Status Report as it deems reasonably necessary in accordance with the Servicing Standard to take into account any input and/or recommendations of the operating advisor or the Directing Certificateholder during the applicable periods described above, but is under no obligation to follow any particular recommendation of the operating advisor or the Directing Certificateholder.
With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder will or is expected to have approval and consultation rights with respect to any asset status report prepared by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA that are substantially similar, but not identical, to the approval and consultation rights of the Directing Certificateholder with respect to the Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Whole Loans. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari
458
Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”. See also “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below.
Realization Upon Mortgage Loans
If a payment default or material non-monetary default on a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) has occurred, then, pursuant to the PSA, the special servicer, on behalf of the trustee, may, in accordance with the terms and provisions of the PSA, at any time institute foreclosure proceedings, exercise any power of sale contained in the related Mortgage, obtain a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise acquire title to the related Mortgaged Property, by operation of law or otherwise. Neither the master servicer nor the special servicer is permitted, however, to cause the trustee to acquire title to any Mortgaged Property, have a receiver of rents appointed with respect to any Mortgaged Property or take any other action with respect to any Mortgaged Property that would cause the trustee, for the benefit of the Certificateholders, or any other specified person to be considered to hold title to, to be a “mortgagee-in-possession” of, or to be an “owner” or an “operator” of such Mortgaged Property within the meaning of certain federal environmental laws, unless the special servicer has determined in accordance with the Servicing Standard, based on an updated environmental assessment report prepared by a person who regularly conducts environmental audits and performed within six months prior to any such acquisition of title or other action (which report will be an expense of the issuing entity subject to the terms of the PSA) that:
(a) such Mortgaged Property is in compliance with applicable environmental laws or, if not, after consultation with an environmental consultant, that it would be in the best economic interest of the Certificateholders (and with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, the related Companion Holders), as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, Companion Holders constituted a single lender, to take such actions as are necessary to bring such Mortgaged Property in compliance with such laws, and
(b) there are no circumstances present at such Mortgaged Property relating to the use, management or disposal of any hazardous materials for which investigation, testing, monitoring, containment, clean-up or remediation could be required under any currently effective federal, state or local law or regulation, or that, if any such hazardous materials are present for which such action could be required, after consultation with an environmental consultant, it would be in the best economic interest of the Certificateholders (and with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, the related Companion Holders), as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, Companion Holders constituted a single lender, to take such actions with respect to the affected Mortgaged Property.
Such requirement precludes enforcement of the security for the related Mortgage Loan until a satisfactory environmental site assessment is obtained (or until any required remedial action is taken), but will decrease the likelihood that the issuing entity will become liable for a material adverse environmental condition at the Mortgaged Property. However, we cannot assure you that the requirements of the PSA will effectively insulate the issuing entity from potential liability for a materially adverse environmental condition at any Mortgaged Property.
If title to any Mortgaged Property is acquired by the issuing entity (directly or through a single member limited liability company established for that purpose), the special servicer will be required to sell the Mortgaged Property prior to the close of the third calendar year beginning after the year of acquisition, unless (1) the IRS grants (or has not denied) a qualifying extension of time to sell the Mortgaged Property or (2) the special servicer
459
obtains for the certificate administrator and the trustee an opinion of independent counsel to the effect that the holding of the Mortgaged Property by the Lower-Tier REMIC longer than the above-referenced 3 year period will not result in the imposition of a tax on any Trust REMIC or cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC under the Code at any time that any certificate is outstanding. Subject to the foregoing and any other tax-related limitations, pursuant to the PSA, the special servicer will generally be required to attempt to sell any Mortgaged Property so acquired in accordance with the Servicing Standard. The special servicer will also be required to ensure that any Mortgaged Property acquired by the issuing entity is administered so that it constitutes “foreclosure property” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(8) at all times, and that the sale of the Mortgaged Property does not result in the receipt by the issuing entity of any income from nonpermitted assets as described in Code Section 860F(a)(2)(B). If the Lower-Tier REMIC acquires title to any Mortgaged Property, the special servicer, on behalf of the Lower-Tier REMIC, will retain, at the expense of the issuing entity, an independent contractor to manage and operate the property. The independent contractor generally will be permitted to perform construction (including renovation) on a foreclosed property only if the construction was more than 10% completed at the time default on the related Mortgage Loan became imminent. The retention of an independent contractor, however, will not relieve the special servicer of its obligation to manage the Mortgaged Property as required under the PSA.
In general, the special servicer will be obligated to cause any Mortgaged Property acquired as an REO Property to be operated and managed in a manner that would, in its reasonable judgment and in accordance with the Servicing Standard, maximize the issuing entity’s net after-tax proceeds from such property. Generally, no Trust REMIC will be taxable on income received with respect to a Mortgaged Property acquired by the issuing entity to the extent that it constitutes “rents from real property”, within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(3)(A) and Treasury regulations under the Code. Rents from real property include fixed rents and rents based on the gross receipts or sales of a tenant but do not include the portion of any rental based on the net income or profit of any tenant or sub-tenant. No determination has been made whether rent on any of the Mortgaged Properties meets this requirement. Rents from real property include charges for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real property, whether or not the charges are separately stated. Services furnished to the tenants of a particular building will be considered as customary if, in the geographic market in which the building is located, tenants in buildings which are of similar class are customarily provided with the service. No determination has been made whether the services furnished to the tenants of the Mortgaged Properties are “customary” within the meaning of applicable regulations. It is therefore possible that a portion of the rental income with respect to a Mortgaged Property owned by the issuing entity would not constitute rents from real property. In addition, it is possible that none of the income with respect to a Mortgaged Property would qualify if a separate charge is not stated for non-customary services provided to tenants or if such services are not performed by an independent contractor. Rents from real property also do not include income from the operation of a trade or business on the Mortgaged Property, such as a hotel property, or rental income attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property if the rent attributable to personal property exceeds 15% of the total net rent for the taxable year. Any of the foregoing types of income may instead constitute “net income from foreclosure property”, which would be taxable to a REMIC at the federal corporate rate (which, as of January 1, 2018, is 21%) and may also be subject to state or local taxes. The PSA provides that the special servicer will be permitted to cause the Lower-Tier REMIC to earn “net income from foreclosure property” that is subject to tax if it determines that the net after-tax benefit to Certificateholders is greater than another method of operating or net leasing the Mortgaged Property. Because
460
these sources of income, if they exist, are already in place with respect to the Mortgaged Properties, it is generally viewed as beneficial to Certificateholders to permit the issuing entity to continue to earn them if it acquires a Mortgaged Property, even at the cost of this tax. These taxes would be chargeable against the related income for purposes of determining the proceeds available for distribution to holders of certificates. See “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxes That May Be Imposed on a REMIC—Prohibited Transactions”.
Under the PSA, the special servicer is required to establish and maintain one or more REO Accounts, to be held on behalf of the trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders and with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the related Companion Holder, for the retention of revenues and insurance proceeds derived from each REO Property. The special servicer is required to use the funds in the REO Account to pay for the proper operation, management, maintenance and disposition of any REO Property, but only to the extent that amounts on deposit in the REO Account relate to such REO Property. To the extent that amounts in the REO Account in respect of any REO Property are insufficient to make such payments, the master servicer is required to make a Servicing Advance, unless it determines such Servicing Advance would be nonrecoverable. On the later of the date that is (x) on or prior to each Determination Date or (y) two (2) business days after such amounts are received and properly identified, the special servicer is required to withdraw from the REO Account and remit to the master servicer, which will deposit all amounts received in respect of each REO Property during the most recently ended Collection Period, net of any amounts withdrawn to make any permitted disbursements, into the Collection Account; provided that the special servicer may retain in the REO Account permitted reserves.
Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties
If the special servicer determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that no satisfactory arrangements (including by way of discounted payoff) can be made for collection of delinquent payments thereon and such sale would be in the best economic interests of the Certificateholders or, in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan, Certificateholders and any holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and Companion Holder constituted a single lender) to attempt to sell a Defaulted Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and any related Serviced Companion Loan as described below, the special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for each Defaulted Loan on behalf of the Certificateholders and the holder of any related Serviced Companion Loan in such manner as will be reasonably likely to realize a fair price. To the extent that a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is not sold together with the related Non-Serviced Companion Loan by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer, the special servicer will, under certain limited circumstances specified in the related Intercreditor Agreement, be entitled to sell (with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan, with the consent of the Directing Certificateholder if no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan if it determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that such action would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders. In the absence of a cash offer at least equal to its outstanding principal balance plus all accrued and unpaid interest and outstanding costs and expenses and certain other amounts under the PSA (a “Par Purchase Price”), the special servicer may purchase the Defaulted Loan for the Par Purchase Price or may accept the first cash offer received from any person that constitutes a fair price for the Defaulted Loan. If multiple offers are received during the period designated by the special servicer for receipt of offers, the special servicer is generally required to select the highest offer. The special servicer is required to give the
461
trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the operating advisor and (other than in respect of any applicable Excluded Loan) the Directing Certificateholder 10 business days’ prior written notice of its intention to sell any such Defaulted Loan. Neither the trustee nor any of its affiliates may make an offer for or purchase any Defaulted Loan. “Defaulted Loan” means a Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan (i) that is delinquent at least 60 days in respect of its Periodic Payments (other than a balloon payment) or delinquent in respect of its balloon payment, if any; provided that in respect of a balloon payment, such period will be 120 days if the related borrower has provided the special servicer with a written and fully executed commitment for refinancing of the related Mortgage Loan from an acceptable lender reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the special servicer; and, in either case, such delinquency is to be determined without giving effect to any grace period permitted by the related Mortgage or Mortgage Note and without regard to any acceleration of payments under the related Mortgage and Mortgage Note or (ii) as to which the special servicer has, by written notice to the related borrower, accelerated the maturity of the indebtedness evidenced by the related Mortgage Note.
The special servicer will be required to determine whether any cash offer constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Loan if the highest offeror is a person other than an Interested Person. In determining whether any offer from a person other than an Interested Person constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Loan, the special servicer will be required to take into account (in addition to the results of any appraisal, updated appraisal or narrative appraisal that it may have obtained pursuant to the PSA within the prior 9 months), among other factors, the period and amount of the occupancy level and physical condition of the related Mortgaged Property and the state of the local economy.
If the offeror is an Interested Person (provided that the trustee may not be a offeror), then the trustee will be required to determine whether the cash offer constitutes a fair price unless (i) the offer is equal to or greater than the applicable Par Purchase Price and (ii) the offer is the highest offer received. Absent an offer at least equal to the Par Purchase Price, no offer from an Interested Person will constitute a fair price unless (A) it is the highest offer received and (B) at least two other offers are received from independent third parties. In determining whether any offer received from an Interested Person represents a fair price for any such Defaulted Loan, the trustee will be supplied with and will be required to rely on the most recent appraisal or updated appraisal conducted in accordance with the PSA within the preceding 9-month period or, in the absence of any such appraisal, on a new appraisal. Except as provided in the following paragraph, the cost of any appraisal will be covered by, and will be reimbursable as, a Servicing Advance by the master servicer.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the preceding paragraph to the contrary, if the trustee is required to determine whether a cash offer by an Interested Person constitutes a fair price, the trustee will be required to (at the expense of the Interested Person) designate an independent third party expert in real estate or commercial mortgage loan matters with at least 5 years’ experience in valuing loans similar to the subject Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as the case may be, that has been selected with reasonable care by the trustee to determine if such cash offer constitutes a fair price for such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan. If the trustee designates such a third party to make such determination, the trustee will be entitled to rely conclusively upon such third party’s determination. The reasonable fees of, and the costs of all appraisals, inspection reports and broker opinions of value incurred by any such third party pursuant to this paragraph will be covered by, and will be reimbursable by, the Interested Person, and to the extent not collected from such Interested Person within 30 days of request therefor, by the master
462
servicer as a Servicing Advance; provided that the trustee will not engage a third party expert whose fees exceed a commercially reasonable amount as determined by the trustee.
The special servicer is required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for each REO Property on behalf of the Certificateholders and the related Companion Holder(s) (if applicable) and to sell each REO Property in the same manner as with respect to a Defaulted Loan.
Notwithstanding any of the foregoing paragraphs, the special servicer will not be required to accept the highest cash offer for a Defaulted Loan or REO Property if the special servicer determines, in consultation with the Directing Certificateholder (unless a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan) and, in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan or an REO Property related to a Serviced Whole Loan, the related Companion Holder(s)), in accordance with the Servicing Standard (and subject to the requirements of any related Intercreditor Agreement), that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a sale of a Serviced Whole Loan or an REO Property related to a Serviced Whole Loan, the related Companion Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, the related Companion Holder(s) constituted a single lender). In addition, the special servicer may accept a lower offer (from any person other than itself or an affiliate) if it determines, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that acceptance of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan or an REO Property related to a Serviced Whole Loan, the related Companion Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, the related Companion Holder(s) constituted a single lender). The special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to sell all Defaulted Loans prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date.
An “Interested Person”, as of the date of any determination, is the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the Directing Certificateholder, any sponsor, any Borrower Party, any independent contractor engaged by the special servicer or any known affiliate of any of the preceding entities. With respect to a Whole Loan if it is a Defaulted Loan, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer (or any independent contractor engaged by the special servicer), or the trustee for the securitization of a Companion Loan, and each related Companion Holder or its representative, any holder of a related mezzanine loan, or any known affiliate of any such party described above.
With respect to any Serviced Whole Loan, pursuant to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement(s), if such Serviced Whole Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan, and if the special servicer determines to sell the related Mortgage Loan in accordance with the discussion in this “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties” section, then the special servicer will be required to sell the related Companion Loan together with such Mortgage Loan as one whole loan and will be required to require that all offers be submitted to the special servicer in writing. The special servicer will not be permitted to sell the related Mortgage Loan together with the related Companion Loan if such Serviced Whole Loan becomes a Defaulted Loan without the consent of the holder of the related Companion Loan, unless the special servicer complies with certain notice and delivery requirements set forth in the PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”.
In addition, with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, if such Mortgage Loan has become a defaulted loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will generally have the right to sell such Mortgage Loan together with the
463
related Companion Loan(s) as notes evidencing one whole loan. The issuing entity, as the holder of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, will have the right to consent to such sale, provided that such Non-Serviced Special Servicer may sell the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan without such consent if the required notices and information regarding such sale are provided to the issuing entity in accordance with the related Intercreditor Agreement. The Directing Certificateholder will be entitled to exercise such consent right so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, and if a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the special servicer will be entitled to exercise such consent rights. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
To the extent that Liquidation Proceeds collected with respect to any Mortgage Loan are less than the sum of (1) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, (2) interest accrued on the Mortgage Loan and (3) the aggregate amount of outstanding reimbursable expenses (including any (i) unpaid servicing compensation, (ii) unreimbursed Servicing Advances, (iii) accrued and unpaid interest on all Advances and (iv) additional expenses of the issuing entity) incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loan, the issuing entity will realize a loss in the amount of the shortfall. The trustee, the master servicer and/or the special servicer will be entitled to reimbursement out of the Liquidation Proceeds recovered on any Mortgage Loan, prior to the distribution of those Liquidation Proceeds to Certificateholders, of any and all amounts that represent unpaid servicing compensation in respect of the related Mortgage Loan, certain unreimbursed expenses incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loan and any unreimbursed Advances (including interest on Advances) made with respect to the Mortgage Loan. In addition, amounts otherwise distributable on the certificates will be further reduced by interest payable to the master servicer, the special servicer or trustee on these Advances.
The Directing Certificateholder
General
Subject to the rights of the holder of any related Companion Loan under the related Intercreditor Agreements as described in the second succeeding paragraph and under “—Rights of the Directing Certificateholder Appointed by the Controlling Class with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Servicing Shift Whole Loans” below, for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder will be entitled to advise (1) the special servicer, with respect to Specially Serviced Loans (other than any Excluded Loan), and will have the right to replace the special servicer with or without cause and have certain other rights under the PSA, each as described below, (2) the special servicer, with respect to all non-Specially Serviced Loans (other than any Excluded Loan), as to all Special Servicer Major Decisions and (3) the master servicer, with respect to the applicable non-Specially Serviced Loans other than any applicable Excluded Loan, as to all Master Servicer Major Decisions. With respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan, upon the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder will have certain consultation rights only, and upon the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholders will not have any consent or consultation rights, as further described below.
With respect to any matter for which the consent of the Directing Certificateholder is required, to the extent no specific time period for deemed consent is expressly stated, in the event no response from the Directing Certificateholder is received within ten (10) business days following written request for consent and its receipt of all reasonably requested information on any required consent, the Directing Certificateholder will be
464
deemed to have consented to or approved the specific matter; provided that the failure of the Directing Certificateholder to respond will not affect any future matters with respect to the applicable Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan.
The “Directing Certificateholder” will be (i) with respect to a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, the related Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder, and (ii) with respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loans), the Controlling Class Certificateholder (or its representative) selected by more than 50% of the Controlling Class Certificateholders, by Certificate Balance, as determined by the certificate registrar from time to time; provided, however, that (for purposes of clause (ii)) above in this definition)
(1) absent that selection,
(2) until a Directing Certificateholder is so selected, or
(3) upon receipt of a notice from a majority of the Controlling Class Certificateholders, by Certificate Balance, that a Directing Certificateholder is no longer designated, the Controlling Class Certificateholder that owns the largest aggregate Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class (or its representative) will be the Directing Certificateholder;
provided, however, that (i) in the case of this clause (3), in the event no one holder owns the largest aggregate Certificate Balance of the Controlling Class, then there will be no Directing Certificateholder until appointed in accordance with the terms of the PSA, and (ii) the certificate administrator and the other parties to the PSA will be entitled to assume that the identity of the Directing Certificateholder has not changed until such parties receive written notice of a replacement of the Directing Certificateholder from a party holding the requisite interest in the Controlling Class (as confirmed by the certificate registrar), or the resignation of the then-current Directing Certificateholder.
The initial Directing Certificateholder is expected to be KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P., or its affiliate.
In no event will the master servicer or the special servicer be required to consult with or obtain the consent of the holder of a Subordinate Companion Loan unless the holder of such Subordinate Companion Loan has delivered notice of its identity and contact information in accordance with the terms of the applicable Intercreditor Agreement (upon which notice the master servicer and the special servicer will be conclusively entitled to rely). The identity of and contact information for the holder of each Subordinate Companion Loan, as of the Closing Date, will be set forth in an exhibit to the PSA (each, an “Initial Subordinate Companion Loan Holder”). The master servicer and the special servicer will be required to consult with or obtain the consent of the applicable Initial Subordinate Companion Loan Holder, in accordance with the terms of the PSA and the applicable Intercreditor Agreement, and will be entitled to assume that the identity of the holder of the applicable Subordinate Companion Loan has not changed until written notice of the transfer of such Subordinate Companion Loan, including the identity of and contact information for the new holder thereof, is provided in accordance with the terms of the applicable Intercreditor Agreement.
“Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder” means, with respect to the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loans, the “controlling holder”, the “directing certificateholder”, the “directing holder”, “directing lender” or any analogous concept under the related Intercreditor Agreement. Prior to the Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder with respect to the Servicing Shift Mortgage Loans will be the holder of the related Controlling Companion Loan, which, in the case of the CrossPoint Whole Loan is currently CCRE Lending or an affiliate thereof, and in the case of the City Square and Clay
465
Street Whole Loan, is currently Ladder Capital Finance LLC or an affiliate thereof. On and after the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, there will be no Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder under the PSA with respect to a Servicing Shift Whole Loan.
A “Controlling Class Certificateholder” is each holder (or Certificate Owner, if applicable) of a certificate of the Controlling Class as determined by the certificate registrar from time to time, upon request by any party to the PSA.
The “Controlling Class” will be, as of any time of determination, the most subordinate class of Control Eligible Certificates then-outstanding that has an aggregate Certificate Balance (as notionally reduced by any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocable to such class) at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of that class; provided, however, that if at any time the Certificate Balances of the certificates other than the Control Eligible Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans, then the Controlling Class will be the most subordinate class of Control Eligible Certificates that has a Certificate Balance greater than zero without regard to any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts. The Controlling Class as of the Closing Date will be the Class NR-RR certificates.
The “Control Eligible Certificates” will be either of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR or Class NR-RR certificates.
The master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator, the trustee or any certificateholder may request that the certificate registrar determine which class of certificates is the then-current Controlling Class and the certificate registrar must thereafter provide such information to the requesting party. The depositor, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and, for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder, may request that the certificate administrator provide, and the certificate administrator must so provide, a list of the holders (or Certificate Owners, if applicable) of the Controlling Class at the expense of the issuing entity. The trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer and the operating advisor may each rely on any such list so provided.
In the event that no Directing Certificateholder has been appointed or identified to the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, and the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, has attempted to obtain such information from the certificate administrator and no such entity has been identified to the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, then until such time as the new Directing Certificateholder is identified to the master servicer and special servicer, the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will have no duty to consult with, provide notice to, or seek the approval or consent of any such Directing Certificateholder, as the case may be.
The Class D-RR certificateholders that are the Controlling Class Certificateholders may waive their rights as the Controlling Class Certificateholders as described in “—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” below.
Major Decisions
Except as otherwise described under “—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” and “—Servicing Override” below and subject to the rights of the holder of the related Companion Loan under the related Intercreditor Agreement as described under “—Rights of the Directing
466
Certificateholder with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Servicing Shift Whole Loans” below, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be permitted to take any of the following actions, as to which the Directing Certificateholder has objected in writing within ten business days (or thirty (30) days with respect to clause (xviii) of the definition of “Major Decision” below) after receipt of the related Major Decision Reporting Package (provided that if such written objection has not been received by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, within such ten-business-day (or 30-day) period, the Directing Certificateholder will be deemed to have approved such action) (each of the following, a “Major Decision”):
(i) any proposed or actual foreclosure upon or comparable conversion (which may include acquisition of an REO Property) of the ownership of properties securing such of the Mortgage Loans and/or Serviced Whole Loan as come into and continue in default;
(ii) any modification, consent to a modification or waiver of any monetary term (other than penalty charges (which the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, is permitted to waive pursuant to the PSA)) or material non-monetary term (including, without limitation the timing of payments and acceptance of discounted pay-offs, but excluding the waiver of penalty charges) of a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan or any extension of the maturity date of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan;
(iii) any sale of a Defaulted Loan or REO Property (other than in connection with the termination of the issuing entity as described under “—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”) for less than the applicable Purchase Price;
(iv) any determination to bring an REO Property into compliance with applicable environmental laws or to otherwise address hazardous material located at an REO Property;
(v) any release of collateral or any acceptance of substitute or additional collateral for a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan or any consent to either of the foregoing, other than immaterial condemnation actions and other similar takings, or if otherwise required pursuant to the specific terms of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;
(vi) any waiver of a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, if lender consent is required, any consent to such a waiver or consent to a transfer of the Mortgaged Property or interests in the borrower or consent to the incurrence of additional debt, other than any such transfer or incurrence of debt as may be effected without the consent of the lender under the related loan agreement or related to an immaterial easement, right of way or similar agreement;
(vii) releases of amounts from any escrow accounts, reserve accounts or letters of credit held as performance or “earn-out” escrows or reserves, other than those required pursuant to the specific terms of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;
(viii) any acceptance of an assumption agreement or any other agreement permitting transfers of interests in a borrower or guarantor or releasing a
467
borrower or guarantor from liability under a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan other than pursuant to the specific terms of such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;
(ix) following a default or an event of default with respect to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, any acceleration of the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, as the case may be, or initiation of judicial, bankruptcy or similar proceedings or other exercise of remedies under the related Mortgage Loan documents or with respect to the related borrower or Mortgaged Property;
(x) approving leases, lease modifications or amendments or any requests for subordination non-disturbance and attornment agreements or other similar agreements with respect to any lease that (a) involves a ground lease or lease of an outparcel or affects an area greater than or equal to the lesser of (1) 20,000 square feet or (2) 20% of the net rentable area of the related Mortgaged Property, (b) involves a tenant or space specifically identified by name or space location in the related Mortgage Loan documents as requiring the consent of the lender for the associated activity or (c) such transaction is not a routine leasing matter for a customary lease of space for parking office retail, warehouse, industrial and/or manufacturing purposes;
(xi) the voting on any plan of reorganization, restructuring or similar plan in the bankruptcy of a borrower;
(xii) any consent to incurrence of mezzanine debt by a direct or indirect parent of a borrower;
(xiii) determining whether to cure any default by a borrower under a ground lease or permit any ground lease modification, amendment or subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement or entry into a new ground lease;
(xiv) other than in the case of any non-Specially Serviced Loan, approval of any waiver regarding the receipt of financial statements (other than immaterial timing waivers including late financial statements which in no event relieve any borrower of the obligation to provide financial statements on at least a quarterly basis) following three consecutive late deliveries of financial statements;
(xv) any approval of or consent to a grant of an easement or right of way that materially affects the use or value of a Mortgaged Property or a borrower’s ability to make payments with respect to the related Mortgage Loan or any related Companion Loan or subordination of the lien of the Mortgage Loan to such easement or right of way;
(xvi) any property management company changes or franchise changes (to the extent the lender is required to consent or approve under the Mortgage Loan documents);
(xvii) any modification, waiver or amendment of a material term of an Intercreditor Agreement or similar agreement with any mezzanine lender or subordinate debt holder or holder of a Pari Passu Companion Loan related to a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, or an action to enforce rights with respect thereto;
(xviii) any determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default;
468
(xix) any proposed modification or waiver of any material provision in the related Mortgage Loan documents governing the type, nature or amount of insurance coverage required to be obtained and maintained by the related borrower;
(xx) any approval of any casualty insurance settlements or condemnation settlements, and any determination to apply casualty proceeds or condemnation awards to the reduction of the debt rather than to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property, in each case, to the extent the lender has discretion under the related Mortgage Loan documents; and
(xxi) approving annual budgets for the related Mortgaged Property with increases (in excess of 10%) in operating expenses or payments to entities actually known by the master servicer to be affiliates of the related borrower (excluding affiliated managers paid at fee rates agreed to at the origination of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan).
Subject to the terms and conditions of this section, (a) the special servicer will process all requests for any matter that constitutes a Major Decision with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan (except for clause (xviii) of the definition of “Major Decision” which will be processed by the master servicer), (b) the special servicer will process all requests for any matter that constitutes a Special Servicer Major Decision with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) unless the master servicer and the special servicer have mutually agreed to have the master servicer process such request in accordance with the terms and conditions reasonably agreed to by the master servicer and special servicer, including the special servicer’s consent, (c) the master servicer will process all requests for any matter that constitutes a Master Servicer Major Decision with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) and with respect to Specially Serviced Loans solely with respect to clause (xviii) of the definition of “Major Decision” and (d) the master servicer will process all requests for any matter that constitutes a Special Servicer Major Decision with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) if the master servicer and the special servicer have mutually agreed to have the master servicer process such request in accordance with the terms and conditions reasonably agreed to by the master servicer and special servicer, including the special servicer’s consent. For the avoidance of doubt, the master servicer and the special servicer have mutually agreed that the master servicer will process the items listed in clauses (i), (ii)(A), (ii)(B) and (iv) of “Special Servicer Non-Major Decision” with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, subject to special servicer consent or deemed consent as provided in the PSA.
Upon receiving a request for any matter that constitutes a Special Servicer Major Decision, the master servicer will be required to forward such request to the special servicer and, unless the master servicer and the special servicer mutually agree that the master servicer will process such request in accordance with the terms and conditions reasonably agreed to by the master servicer and special servicer, including the special servicer’s consent, the special servicer will be required to process such request and the master servicer will have no further obligation with respect to such request or the related Special Servicer Major Decision.
With respect to any borrower request or other action on non-Specially Serviced Loans that is not a Special Servicer Non-Major Decision or a Major Decision, the master servicer will not be required to obtain the consent of or consult with the special servicer, any Directing Certificateholder or the operating advisor.
469
Prior to the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will be required to provide each Major Decision Reporting Package to the operating advisor promptly after the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, receives the Directing Certificateholder’s approval or deemed approval of such Major Decision Reporting Package; provided, however, that with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan no Major Decision Reporting Package will be required to be delivered prior to the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event. After the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event (whether or not a Control Termination Event is continuing), the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will be required to provide each Major Decision Reporting Package to the operating advisor simultaneously with the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s written request, as applicable, for the operating advisor’s input regarding the related Major Decision (which written request and Major Decision Reporting Package may be delivered in one notice), as set forth under “—Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event” below. With respect to any particular Major Decision and/or related Major Decision Reporting Package or any Asset Status Report required to be delivered by the master servicer or special servicer to the operating advisor, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will be required to make available to the operating advisor a servicing officer with the relevant knowledge regarding the applicable Mortgage Loan and such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report in order to address reasonable questions that the operating advisor may have relating to, among other things, such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report.
“Major Decision Reporting Package” means, with respect to any Major Decision for which it is processing, a written report by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, describing in reasonable detail (i) the background and circumstances requiring action of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, and (ii) the proposed course of action recommended.
“Master Servicer Major Decision” means any Major Decision under clauses (xvi) through (xxi) of the definition of “Major Decision”.
“Special Servicer Major Decision” means any Major Decision under clauses (i) through (xv) of the definition of “Major Decision”.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder will remain entitled to receive any notices, reports or information to which it is entitled, and the special servicer and any other applicable party will consult (on a non-binding basis) (other than with respect to any Excluded Loan) with the Directing Certificateholder in connection with any Major Decision in accordance with the PSA. After the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event (and at any time with respect to any Excluded Loan), the Directing Certificateholder (other than the Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder) will have no direction, consultation or consent rights in connection with any Major Decision and no right to receive any notices, reports or information (other than notices, reports or information required to be delivered to all Certificateholders) or any other rights as Directing Certificateholder.
Asset Status Report
So long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder will have the right to disapprove the Asset Status Report prepared by the
470
special servicer with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan (other than with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is an Excluded Loan. If a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder will have no right to consult with the special servicer with respect to the Asset Status Reports. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Asset Status Report” above.
Replacement of the Special Servicer
With respect to any Mortgage Loan other than (i) a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or (ii) an Excluded Loan and for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder will have the right to replace the special servicer with or without cause as described under “—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause” and “—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” below.
Control Termination Event, Consultation Termination Event and Operating Advisor Consultation Event
With respect to any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or an Excluded Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan and subject to the rights of any Companion Holder under an Intercreditor Agreement, if a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, but for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the special servicer will not be required to obtain the consent of the Directing Certificateholder with respect to any of the Major Decisions or Asset Status Reports, but will be required to consult with the Directing Certificateholder in connection with any Major Decision or Asset Status Report (or any other matter for which the consent of the Directing Certificateholder would have been required or for which the Directing Certificateholder would have the right to direct the special servicer if no Control Termination Event had occurred and was continuing) and to consider alternative actions recommended by the Directing Certificateholder, in respect of such Major Decision or Asset Status Report (or such other matter). Such consultation will not be binding on the special servicer. In the event the special servicer receives no response from the Directing Certificateholder within 10 business days following its written request for input on any required consultation, the special servicer will not be obligated to consult with the Directing Certificateholder on the specific matter; provided, however, that the failure of the Directing Certificateholder to respond will not relieve the special servicer from consulting with the Directing Certificateholder on any future matters with respect to the related Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or any Excluded Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan. With respect to any Excluded Special Servicer Loan (that is not also an Excluded Loan), if any, the Directing Certificateholder (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event) will be required to select an Excluded Special Servicer with respect to such Excluded Special Servicer Loan. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, if at any time the applicable Excluded Special Servicer Loan is also an Excluded Loan or if the Directing Certificateholder is entitled to appoint the Excluded Special Servicer but does not so appoint within 30 days of notice of such resignation, the resigning special servicer will be required to select the related Excluded Special Servicer. The resigning special servicer will not have any liability with respect to the actions or inactions of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer or with respect to the identity of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer. The special servicer will be required to provide each Major Decision Reporting Package to the operating advisor (a) prior to the occurrence of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, promptly after the special servicer receives the Directing Certificateholder’s approval or deemed approval with respect to such Major Decision or (b) following the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor
471
Consultation Event, simultaneously upon providing such Major Decision Reporting Package to the Directing Certificateholder; provided, however, that with respect to any non-Specially Serviced Loan no Major Decision Reporting Package will be required to be delivered prior to the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event. With respect to any particular Major Decision and/or related Major Decision Reporting Package or any Asset Status Report required to be delivered by the special servicer to the operating advisor, the special servicer will be required to make available to the operating advisor a servicing officer with the relevant knowledge regarding any Mortgage Loan and such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report in order to address reasonable questions that the operating advisor may have relating to, among other things, such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report and potential conflicts of interest with respect to such Major Decision and/or Asset Status Report.
In addition, if an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, the special servicer will also be required to consult with the operating advisor in connection with any Major Decision processed by the special servicer and for which it has delivered to the operating advisor a Major Decision Reporting Package (and such other matters that are subject to consultation rights of the operating advisor pursuant to the PSA) and to consider alternative actions recommended by the operating advisor in respect of such Major Decision; provided that such consultation is on a non-binding basis. In the event the special servicer receives no response from the operating advisor within 10 business days following the later of (i) its written request for input (which initial request is required to include the related Major Decision Reporting Package) on any required consultation and (ii) delivery of all such additional information reasonably requested by the operating advisor related to the subject matter of such consultation, the special servicer will not be obligated to consult with the operating advisor on the specific matter; provided, however, that the failure of the operating advisor to respond will not relieve the special servicer from consulting with the operating advisor on any future matters with respect to the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan or any other Mortgage Loan. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this prospectus, with respect to any applicable Excluded Loan (regardless of whether an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing), the special servicer or the related Excluded Special Servicer, as applicable, will be required to consult with the operating advisor, on a non-binding basis, in connection with the related transactions involving proposed Major Decisions that it is processing and consider alternative actions recommended by the operating advisor, in respect thereof, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the PSA for consulting with the operating advisor.
If a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, no class of certificates will act as the Controlling Class, and the Directing Certificateholder will not have any consultation or consent rights under the PSA or any right to receive any notices, reports or information (other than notices, reports or information required to be delivered to all Certificateholders) or any other rights as Directing Certificateholder under the PSA. The special servicer will nonetheless be required to consult with only the operating advisor in connection with Major Decisions, asset status reports and other material special servicing actions to the extent set forth in the PSA, and no Controlling Class Certificateholder will be recognized or have any right to approve or be consulted with respect to asset status reports or material special servicer actions.
A “Control Termination Event” will occur when (i) the Class D-RR certificates have a Certificate Balance (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of such class) of less than 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of that class or (ii) a holder of the Class D-RR certificates is the majority Controlling Class Certificateholder and has irrevocably waived its
472
right, in writing, to exercise any of the rights of the Controlling Class Certificateholder and such rights have not been reinstated to a successor controlling class certificateholder as described below; provided that no Control Termination Event may occur with respect to a Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder and the term “Control Termination Event” will not be applicable to a Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder; provided, however, that a Control Termination Event will not be deemed continuing in the event that the Certificate Balances of the certificates other than the Control Eligible Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans.
A “Consultation Termination Event” will occur when (i) there is no class of Control Eligible Certificates that has a then-outstanding Certificate Balance at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Balance of that class, in each case, without regard to the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts; or (ii) a holder of the Class D-RR certificates is the majority Controlling Class Certificateholder and has irrevocably waived its right, in writing, to exercise any of the rights of the Controlling Class Certificateholder and such rights have not been reinstated to a successor controlling class certificateholder pursuant to the terms of the PSA; provided that no Consultation Termination Event resulting solely from the operation of clause (ii) will be deemed to have existed or be in continuance with respect to a successor holder of the Class D-RR certificates that has not irrevocably waived its right to exercise any of the rights of the Controlling Class Certificateholder; provided that no Consultation Termination Event may occur with respect to a Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder and the term “Consultation Termination Event” will not be applicable to a Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder; provided, however, that a Consultation Termination Event will not be deemed continuing in the event that the Certificate Balances of the certificates other than the Control Eligible Certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans.
The Directing Certificateholder will not have any consent or consultation rights with respect to any Mortgage Loan determined to be an Excluded Loan. Notwithstanding the proviso to each of the definitions of “Control Termination Event” and “Consultation Termination Event”, in respect of the servicing of any such Excluded Loan, a Control Termination Event will be deemed to have occurred and be continuing and Consultation Termination Event will be deemed to have occurred with respect to such Excluded Loan.
At any time that the Controlling Class Certificateholder is the holder of a majority of the Class D-RR certificates and the Class D-RR certificates are the Controlling Class, it may waive its right (a) to appoint the Directing Certificateholder and (b) to exercise any of the Directing Certificateholder’s rights set forth in the PSA by irrevocable written notice delivered to the depositor, certificate administrator, master servicer, special servicer and operating advisor. During such time, the special servicer will be required to consult with only the operating advisor in connection with asset status reports and material special servicing actions to the extent set forth in the PSA, and no Controlling Class Certificateholder will be recognized or have any right to replace the special servicer or approve or be consulted with respect to asset status reports or material special servicer actions. Any such waiver will remain effective until such time as the majority Controlling Class Certificateholder sells or transfers all or a portion of its interest in the certificates to an unaffiliated third party if such unaffiliated third party then holds the majority of the Controlling Class after giving effect to such transfer. Following any such sale or transfer of Class D-RR certificates, the successor Class D-RR certificateholder that is the majority Controlling Class Certificateholder will be reinstated as, and will again have the rights of, the Controlling Class Certificateholder without regard to any prior waiver by the predecessor certificateholder that was the majority Controlling Class Certificateholder. The successor Class D-RR certificateholder that is the Controlling Class Certificateholder will also have the
473
right to irrevocably waive its right to appoint the Directing Certificateholder and to exercise any of the rights of the Controlling Class Certificateholder. In the event of any transfer of the Class D-RR certificates by a Controlling Class Certificateholder that had irrevocably waived its rights as described in this paragraph, the successor Controlling Class Certificateholder that purchased such Class D-RR certificates, even if it does not waive its rights as described in the preceding sentence, will not have any consent rights with respect to any Mortgage Loan that became a Specially Serviced Loan prior to such successor Controlling Class Certificateholder’s purchase of such Class D-RR certificates and had not become a Corrected Loan prior to such purchase until such Mortgage Loan becomes a Corrected Loan.
An “Operating Advisor Consultation Event” will occur when the Certificate Balances of the Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates in the aggregate (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of such classes) is 25% or less of the initial Certificate Balances of such classes in the aggregate. The certificate administrator will be required to notify the trustee, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the master servicer and the special servicer of the commencement or cessation of any Operating Advisor Consultation Event.
For a description of certain restrictions on any modification, waiver or amendment to the Mortgage Loan documents, see “—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments” above.
Servicing Override
In the event that the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, determines that immediate action with respect to any Major Decision (or any other matter requiring consent of the Directing Certificateholder with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event in the PSA (or any matter requiring consultation with the Directing Certificateholder or the operating advisor)) is necessary to protect the interests of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan, the interest of the Certificateholders and the holders of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan), as a collective whole (taking into account the subordinate or pari passu nature of any Companion Loan), the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, may take any such action without waiting for the Directing Certificateholder’s response (or without waiting to consult with the Directing Certificateholder or the operating advisor, as the case may be); provided that the special servicer or master servicer, as applicable, provides the Directing Certificateholder (or the operating advisor, if applicable) with prompt written notice following such action including a reasonably detailed explanation of the basis for such action.
In addition, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer (i) will be required to take or refrain from taking any action pursuant to instructions or objections from the Directing Certificateholder, or (ii) may follow any advice or consultation provided by the Directing Certificateholder or the holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (or its representative) that would (1) cause it to violate any applicable law, the related Mortgage Loan documents, any related Intercreditor Agreement, the PSA, including the Servicing Standard, or the REMIC provisions, (2) expose the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the issuing entity or the trustee to liability, (3) materially expand the scope of responsibilities of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, under the PSA or (4) cause the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, to act, or fail to act, in a manner which in the reasonable judgment of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, is not in the best interests of the Certificateholders.
474
Rights of the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class with respect to Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Servicing Shift Whole Loans
With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan or Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class will not be entitled to exercise the rights described above, but such rights, or rights substantially similar to those rights, will be exercisable by the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder or Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder, as applicable. The issuing entity, as the holder of a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan, has consultation rights with respect to certain major decisions relating to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan and, other than in respect of an Excluded Loan, so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class will be entitled to exercise such consultation rights of the issuing entity pursuant to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement. In addition, other than in respect of an applicable Excluded Loan, so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class may have certain consent rights in connection with a sale of a Non-Serviced Whole Loan or Servicing Shift Whole Loan that has become a defaulted loan under the related Non-Serviced PSA. See also “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans”.
Rights of the Holders of Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans
With respect to a Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan that has a related Pari Passu Companion Loan, the holder of the related Pari Passu Companion Loan has consultation rights with respect to certain Major Decisions and notice and information rights in connection with the sale of the related Serviced Whole Loan if it has become a Defaulted Loan to the extent described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties”.
Limitation on Liability of Directing Certificateholder
The Directing Certificateholder will not be liable to the issuing entity or the Certificateholders for any action taken, or for refraining from the taking of any action, or for errors in judgment. However, the Directing Certificateholder will not be protected against any liability to the Controlling Class Certificateholders that would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of duties or by reason of reckless disregard of obligations or duties owed to the Controlling Class Certificateholders.
Each Certificateholder will acknowledge and agree, by its acceptance of its certificates, that the Directing Certificateholder appointed by the Controlling Class:
(a) may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates;
(b) may act solely in the interests of the holders of the Controlling Class;
(c) does not have any liability or duties to the holders of any class of certificates other than the Controlling Class;
475
(d) may take actions that favor the interests of the holders of one or more classes including the Controlling Class over the interests of the holders of one or more other classes of certificates; and
(e) will have no liability whatsoever for having so acted as set forth in (a) – (d) above, and no Certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the Directing Certificateholder or any director, officer, employee, agent or principal of the Directing Certificateholder for having so acted.
The taking of, or refraining from taking, any action by the master servicer or the special servicer in accordance with the direction of or approval of the Directing Certificateholder, which does not violate the terms of any Mortgage Loan, any law, the Servicing Standard or the provisions of the PSA or the related Intercreditor Agreement, will not result in any liability on the part of the master servicer or special servicer.
Each Certificateholder will acknowledge and agree, by its acceptance of its certificates, that the holders of a Non-Serviced Companion Loan or a Companion Loan that is part of the Servicing Shift Whole Loan or their respective designees (e.g., the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder) will have limitations on liability with respect to actions taken in connection with the related Mortgage Loan similar to the limitations of the Directing Certificateholder described above pursuant to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement and the related Non-Serviced PSA. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
The Operating Advisor
General
The operating advisor will act solely as a contracting party to the extent set forth in the PSA, and in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard, and will have no fiduciary duty to any party. The operating advisor’s duties will be limited to its specific duties under the PSA, and the operating advisor will have no duty or liability to any particular class of certificates or any Certificateholder. The operating advisor is not the special servicer or a sub-servicer and will not be charged with changing the outcome on any particular Specially Serviced Loan. By purchasing a certificate, potential investors acknowledge and agree that there could be a variety of activities or decisions made with respect to, or multiple strategies to resolve any Specially Serviced Loan and that the goal of the operating advisor’s participation is to provide additional input relating to the special servicer’s compliance with the Servicing Standard in making its determinations as to which strategy to execute.
Potential investors should note that the operating advisor is not an “advisor” for any purpose other than as specifically set forth in the PSA and is not an advisor to any person, including without limitation any Certificateholder. For the avoidance of doubt, the operating advisor is not an “investment adviser” within the meaning of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and the Mortgage Loans Can Impact Your Investment”.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the operating advisor will generally have no obligations or consultation rights as operating advisor under the PSA for this transaction with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan (which will be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA), Servicing Shift Whole Loan or any related REO Properties. Furthermore, the operating advisor will have no obligation or responsibility at any time to review or assess the actions
476
of the master servicer for compliance with the Servicing Standard, and the operating advisor will not be required to consider such master servicer actions in connection with any Operating Advisor Annual Report.
Duties of Operating Advisor at All Times
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan (other than a Servicing Shift Whole Loan), the operating advisor’s obligations will generally consist of the following:
(a) reviewing the actions of the special servicer with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan to the extent described in this prospectus and required under the PSA;
(b) reviewing (i) all reports by the special servicer made available to Privileged Persons that are posted on the certificate administrator’s website and (ii) each Asset Status Report (after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event) and Final Asset Status Report;
(c) recalculating and verifying the accuracy of the mathematical calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portion of the applicable formulas required to be utilized in connection with Appraisal Reduction Amounts, Collateral Deficiency Amounts and net present value calculations used in the special servicer’s determination of what course of action to take in connection with the workout or liquidation of a Specially Serviced Loan, as described below; and
(d) preparing an annual report (if any Mortgage Loan (other than a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan (other than a Servicing Shift Whole Loan) was a Specially Serviced Loan at any time during the prior calendar year or if the operating advisor was entitled to consult with the special servicer with respect to any Major Decision during the prior calendar year) generally in the form attached as Annex C, to be provided to the certificate administrator (and made available through the certificate administrator’s website) and the 17g-5 Information Provider (and made available through the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website), as described below under “—Annual Report”; below.
In connection with the performance of the duties described in clause (c) above:
(i) after the calculation has been finalized (and, if an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, prior to the utilization by the special servicer, the special servicer will be required to deliver the foregoing calculations together with information and support materials (including such additional information reasonably requested by the operating advisor to confirm the mathematical accuracy of such calculations, but not including any Privileged Information) to the operating advisor;
(ii) if the operating advisor does not agree with the mathematical calculations or the application of the applicable non-discretionary portions of the formula required to be utilized for such calculation, the operating advisor and the special servicer will be required to consult with each other in order to resolve any inaccuracy in the mathematical calculations or the application of the non-discretionary portions of the related formula in arriving at those mathematical calculations or any disagreement; and
477
(iii) if the operating advisor and the special servicer are not able to resolve such matters, the operating advisor will be required to promptly notify the certificate administrator and the certificate administrator will be required to examine the calculations and supporting materials provided by the special servicer and the operating advisor and determine which calculation is to apply.
Prior to the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, the operating advisor’s review will be limited to an after-the-action review of the reports, calculations and materials described above (together with any additional information and material reviewed by the operating advisor), and, therefore, it will have no involvement with respect to the determination and execution of Major Decisions and other similar actions that the special servicer may perform under the PSA and will have no obligations at any time with respect to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan. In addition, with respect to the operating advisor’s review of net present value calculations as described above, the operating advisor’s recalculation will not take into account the reasonableness of special servicer’s property and borrower performance assumptions or other similar discretionary portions of the net present value calculation.
The “Operating Advisor Standard” means the requirement that the operating advisor must act solely on behalf of the issuing entity and in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the Certificateholders and, with respect to any Serviced Whole Loan (other than a Servicing Shift Whole Loan) for the benefit of the holders of the related Companion Loan (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and Companion Holders constituted a single lender), and not to holders of any particular class of certificates (as determined by the operating advisor in the exercise of its good faith and reasonable judgment), but without regard to any conflict of interest arising from any relationship that the operating advisor or any of its affiliates may have with any of the underlying borrowers, any sponsor, any mortgage loan seller, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer, the Directing Certificateholder, any Certificateholder or any of their affiliates. The operating advisor will perform all of its duties under the PSA in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard.
Annual Report
Based on the operating advisor’s review of (i) any assessment of compliance report, any Attestation Report and other information delivered to the operating advisor by the special servicer or made available to Privileged Persons that are posted on the certificate administrator’s website during the prior calendar year, (ii) prior to the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan, any related Final Asset Status Report or any approved or deemed approved Major Decision Reporting Package provided to the operating advisor with respect to any Mortgage Loan and (iii) after the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, any Asset Status Report and any Major Decision Reporting Package provided to the operating advisor, the operating advisor will ((i) if any Mortgage Loans (other than a Servicing Shift Whole Loan) were Specially Serviced Loans at any time during the prior calendar year or (ii) if the operating advisor was entitled to consult with the special servicer with respect to any Major Decision) prepare an annual report generally in the form attached as Annex C (the “Operating Advisor Annual Report”) to be provided to the 17g-5 Information Provider (and made available through the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) and the certificate administrator for the benefit of the Certificateholders (and made available through the certificate administrator’s website) within 120 days of the end of the prior calendar year that (a) sets forth whether the operating advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the special servicer is operating in compliance with the Servicing Standard with respect to its performance of its duties under the PSA with
478
respect to Specially Serviced Loans (and, after the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, with respect to Major Decisions on non-Specially Serviced Loans) during the prior calendar year on an “asset-level basis” and (b) identifies (1) which, if any, standards the operating advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, the special servicer has failed to comply and (2) any material deviations from the special servicer’s obligations under the PSA with respect to the resolution or liquidation of any Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property (other than with respect to any REO Property related to any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or any Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan; provided, however, that in the event the special servicer is replaced, the Operating Advisor Annual Report will only relate to the entity that was acting as special servicer as of December 31 in the prior calendar year and is continuing in such capacity through the date of such Operating Advisor Annual Report. In preparing any Operating Advisor Annual Report, the operating advisor will not be required to report on instances of non-compliance with, or deviations from, the Servicing Standard or the special servicer’s obligations under the PSA that the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, to be immaterial.
Only as used in connection with the Operating Advisor Annual Report, the term “asset-level basis” refers to the special servicer’s performance of its duties with respect to the resolution or liquidation of Specially Serviced Loans (and, after the occurrence and continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event, with respect to Major Decisions on non-Specially Serviced Loans) under the PSA, taking into account the special servicer’s specific duties under the PSA as well as the extent to which those duties were performed in accordance with the Servicing Standard, with reasonable consideration by the operating advisor of any assessment of compliance report, Attestation Report, Major Decision Reporting Package, Asset Status Report (after the occurrence and during the continuance of an Operating Advisor Consultation Event), Final Asset Status Report and any other information delivered to the operating advisor by the special servicer (other than any communications between the Directing Certificateholder and the special servicer that would be Privileged Information) pursuant to the PSA.
The special servicer must be given an opportunity to review any annual report produced by the operating advisor at least 5 business days prior to its delivery to the certificate administrator and the 17g-5 Information Provider; provided that the operating advisor will have no obligation to adopt any comments to such annual report that are provided by the special servicer.
In each Operating Advisor Annual Report, the operating advisor will identify any material deviations (i) from the Servicing Standard and (ii) from the special servicer’s obligations under the PSA with respect to the resolution or liquidation of Specially Serviced Loans or REO Properties that the special servicer is responsible for servicing under the PSA (other than with respect to any REO Property related to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan or Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan) based on the limited review required in the PSA. Each Operating Advisor Annual Report will be required to comply with the confidentiality requirements, subject to certain exceptions, each as described in this prospectus and as provided in the PSA regarding Privileged Information.
The ability to perform the duties of the operating advisor and the quality and the depth of any Operating Advisor Annual Report will be dependent upon the timely receipt of information prepared or made available by others and the accuracy and the completeness of such information. In addition, in no event will the operating advisor have the power to compel any transaction party to take, or refrain from taking, any action. It is possible that the lack of access to Privileged Information may limit or prohibit the operating advisor from performing its duties under the PSA, in which case any Operating Advisor Annual Report will
479
describe any resulting limitations, and the operating advisor will not be subject to any liability arising from such limitations or prohibitions. The operating advisor will be entitled to conclusively rely on the accuracy and completeness of any information it is provided without liability for any such reliance thereunder.
Additional Duties of Operating Advisor While an Operating Advisor Consultation Event Has Occurred and Is Continuing
With respect to each Mortgage Loan (other than any Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan) or Serviced Whole Loan, after the operating advisor has received notice that an Operating Advisor Consultation Event has occurred and is continuing, in addition to the duties described above, the operating advisor will be required to perform the following additional duties:
● | to consult (on a non-binding basis) with the special servicer (in person or remotely via electronic, telephonic or other mutually agreeable communication) in respect of the Asset Status Reports in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard, as described under “—Asset Status Report”; and |
● | to consult (on a non-binding basis) with the special servicer to the extent it has received a Major Decision Reporting Package (in person or remotely via electronic, telephonic or other mutually agreeable communication) in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard with respect to Major Decisions processed by the special servicer as described under “—The Directing Certificateholder—Major Decisions”. |
Recommendation of the Replacement of the Special Servicer
If at any time the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that (1) the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the PSA or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard, and (2) the replacement of the special servicer would be in the best interest of the Certificateholders as a collective whole, then the operating advisor will have the right to recommend the replacement of the special servicer and deliver a report supporting such recommendation in the manner described in “—Replacement of Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote”.
Eligibility of Operating Advisor
The operating advisor will be required to be an Eligible Operating Advisor at all times during the term of the PSA. “Eligible Operating Advisor” means an institution:
(i) that is a special servicer or operating advisor on a commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction rated by the Rating Agencies (including, in the case of the operating advisor, this transaction) but has not been a special servicer or operating advisor on a transaction for which any Rating Agency has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more classes of certificates for such transaction citing servicing or other relevant concerns with the operating advisor in its capacity as the special servicer or operating advisor, as applicable, as the sole or a material factor in such rating action;
(ii) that can and will make the representations and warranties of the operating advisor set forth in the PSA;
480
(iii) that is not (and is not affiliated with) the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, a mortgage loan seller, a Borrower Party, the Directing Certificateholder, the Third Party Purchaser or a depositor, a trustee, a certificate administrator, the master servicer or the special servicer with respect to the securitization of a Companion Loan, or any of their respective affiliates;
(iv) that has not been paid by the special servicer or successor special servicer any fees, compensation or other remuneration (x) in respect of its obligations under the PSA or (y) for the appointment or recommendation for replacement of a successor special servicer to become the special servicer;
(v) that (x) has been regularly engaged in the business of analyzing and advising clients in commercial mortgage-backed securities matters and has at least five years of experience in collateral analysis and loss projections, and (y) has at least five years of experience in commercial real estate asset management and experience in the workout and management of distressed commercial real estate assets; and
(vi) that does not directly or indirectly, through one or more affiliates or otherwise, own or have derivative exposure in any interest in any certificates, any Mortgage Loans, any Companion Loan or any securities backed by a Companion Loan or otherwise have any financial interest in the securitization transaction to which the PSA relates, other than in fees from its role as operating advisor and asset representations reviewer (to the extent it also acts as the asset representations reviewer).
Other Obligations of Operating Advisor
At all times, subject to the Privileged Information Exception, the operating advisor and its affiliates will be obligated to keep confidential any information appropriately labeled “Privileged Information” received from the special servicer or the Directing Certificateholder in connection with the Directing Certificateholder’s exercise of any rights under the PSA (including, without limitation, in connection with any Asset Status Report) or otherwise in connection with the transaction, except under the circumstances described below. As used in this prospectus, “Privileged Information” means any (i) correspondence between the Directing Certificateholder and the special servicer related to any Specially Serviced Loan (other than with respect to an Excluded Loan) or the exercise of the Directing Certificateholder’s consent or consultation rights under the PSA, (ii) strategically sensitive information (including any such information contained within an Asset Status Report) that the special servicer has reasonably determined could compromise the issuing entity’s position in any ongoing or future negotiations with the related borrower or other interested party and that is labeled or otherwise identified as Privileged Information by the special servicer and (iii) information subject to attorney-client privilege.
The operating advisor is required to keep all such labeled Privileged Information confidential and may not disclose such labeled Privileged Information to any person (including Certificateholders other than the Directing Certificateholder), other than (1) to the extent expressly required by the PSA, to the other parties to the PSA with a notice indicating that such information is Privileged Information (2) pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception, or (3) where necessary to support specific findings or conclusions concerning allegations of deviations from the Servicing Standard (i) in the Operating Advisor Annual Report or (ii) in connection with a recommendation by the operating advisor to replace the special servicer. Each party to the PSA that receives Privileged Information
481
from the operating advisor with a notice stating that such information is Privileged Information may not disclose such Privileged Information to any person without the prior written consent of the special servicer and, unless a Control Termination Event has occurred, the Directing Certificateholder (with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than a Non-Serviced Whole Loan and other than any applicable Excluded Loan) other than pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception. In addition and for the avoidance of doubt, while the operating advisor may serve in a similar capacity with respect to other securitizations that involve the same parties or borrowers involved in this securitization, the knowledge of the operating advisor gained from such other securitizations will not be imputed to the operating advisor in its role in this securitization.
“Privileged Information Exception” means, with respect to any Privileged Information, at any time (a) such Privileged Information becomes generally available to the public other than as a result of a disclosure directly or indirectly by the party restricted from disclosing such Privileged Information (the “Restricted Party”), (b) it is reasonable and necessary for the Restricted Party to disclose such Privileged Information in working with legal counsel, auditors, taxing authorities or other governmental agencies, (c) such Privileged Information was already known to such Restricted Party and not otherwise subject to a confidentiality obligation and/or (d) the Restricted Party is (in the case of the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator and the trustee, as evidenced by evidence as set forth in the PSA (which will be an additional expense of the issuing entity) delivered to each of the master servicer, the special servicer, the Directing Certificateholder, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the certificate administrator and the trustee) required by law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree to disclose such information.
Neither the operating advisor nor any of its affiliates may make any investment in any class of certificates.
Delegation of Operating Advisor’s Duties
The operating advisor may delegate its duties to agents or subcontractors in accordance with the PSA to the extent such agents or subcontractors satisfy clauses (iii), (iv) and (vi) of the definition of “Eligible Operating Advisor”; however, the operating advisor will remain obligated and primarily liable for any actions required to be performed by it under the PSA without diminution of such obligation or liability or related obligation or liability by virtue of such delegation or arrangements or by virtue of indemnification from any person acting as its agents or subcontractor to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as if the operating advisor alone were performing its obligations under the PSA.
Termination of the Operating Advisor With Cause
The following constitute operating advisor termination events under the PSA (each, an “Operating Advisor Termination Event”), whether any such event is voluntary or involuntary or is effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body:
(a) any failure by the operating advisor to observe or perform in any material respect any of its covenants or agreements or the material breach of any of its representations or warranties under the PSA, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the operating advisor by any party to the PSA or to the operating advisor, the certificate administrator and the trustee by the holders of certificates having greater than 25% of the aggregate Voting Rights; provided that with respect to any such
482
failure which is not curable within such 30 day period, the operating advisor will have an additional cure period of 30 days to effect such cure so long as it has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 30 day period and has provided the trustee and the certificate administrator with an officer’s certificate certifying that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, such cure;
(b) any failure by the operating advisor to perform in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the operating advisor by any party to the PSA;
(c) any failure by the operating advisor to be an Eligible Operating Advisor, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the operating advisor by any party to the PSA;
(d) a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law for the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding up or liquidation of its affairs, was entered against the operating advisor, and such decree or order remained in force undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days;
(e) the operating advisor consents to the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator or liquidation committee in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities, voluntary liquidation, or similar proceedings of or relating to the operating advisor or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; or
(f) the operating advisor admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations.
Upon receipt by the certificate administrator of notice of the occurrence of any Operating Advisor Termination Event, the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders electronically by posting such notice on its internet website and by mail, unless the certificate administrator has received notice that such Operating Advisor Termination Event has been remedied.
Rights Upon Operating Advisor Termination Event
After the occurrence of an Operating Advisor Termination Event, the trustee may, and upon the written direction of Certificateholders representing at least 25% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of the classes of certificates), the trustee will, promptly terminate the operating advisor for cause and appoint a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor; provided that no such termination will be effective until a successor operating advisor has been appointed and has assumed all of the obligations of the operating advisor under the PSA. The trustee may rely on a certification by the replacement operating advisor that it is an Eligible Operating Advisor. If the trustee is unable to find a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor within 30 days of the termination of the operating advisor, the depositor will be permitted to find a replacement.
483
Upon any termination of the operating advisor and appointment of a successor operating advisor, the trustee will, as soon as possible, be required to give written notice of the termination and appointment to the special servicer, the master servicer, the certificate administrator, the depositor, the Directing Certificateholder (for any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan and only for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred), any Companion Loan holder, the Certificateholders and the 17g-5 Information Provider (and made available through the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website).
Waiver of Operating Advisor Termination Event
The holders of certificates representing at least 25% of the Voting Rights affected by any Operating Advisor Termination Event may waive such Operating Advisor Termination Event within 20 days of the receipt of notice from the trustee of the occurrence of such Operating Advisor Termination Event. Upon any such waiver of an Operating Advisor Termination Event, such Operating Advisor Termination Event will cease to exist and will be deemed to have been remedied. Upon any such waiver of an Operating Advisor Termination Event by Certificateholders, the trustee and the certificate administrator will be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with enforcement action taken with respect to such Operating Advisor Termination Event prior to such waiver from the issuing entity.
Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause
After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the operating advisor may be removed upon (i) the written direction of Certificateholders evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of classes to which such Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts are allocable) requesting a vote to replace the operating advisor with a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor selected by such Certificateholders, (ii) payment by such requesting holders to the certificate administrator of all reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote and (iii) receipt by the trustee of the Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such removal.
The certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders of such request by posting such notice on its internet website, and by mail, and conduct the solicitation of votes of all certificates in such regard.
Upon the vote or written direction of holders of at least 75% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances of classes to which such Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts are allocable), the trustee will immediately replace the operating advisor with the replacement operating advisor.
Resignation of the Operating Advisor
The operating advisor may resign upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the asset representations reviewer, the Directing Certificateholder if the operating advisor has secured a replacement operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor and such replacement operating advisor has accepted its appointment as the replacement operating advisor and receipt by the trustee of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency. If no successor operating advisor has been so appointed and accepted the appointment within 30 days after the notice of resignation, the resigning operating advisor may petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor
484
operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor. No such resignation will become effective until the replacement operating advisor has assumed the resigning operating advisor’s responsibilities and obligations. The resigning operating advisor must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
Operating Advisor Compensation
Certain fees will be payable to the operating advisor, and the operating advisor will be entitled to be reimbursed for certain expenses, as described under “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor and Asset Representations Reviewer”.
In the event the operating advisor resigns or is terminated for any reason it will remain entitled to any accrued and unpaid fees and reimbursement of Operating Advisor Expenses and any rights to indemnification provided under the PSA with respect to the period for which it acted as operating advisor.
The operating advisor will be entitled to reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by the operating advisor in the event that the operating advisor is terminated without cause. See “—Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause” above.
The Asset Representations Reviewer
Asset Review
Asset Review Trigger
On or prior to each Distribution Date, based on the CREFC® delinquent loan status report and/or the CREFC® loan periodic update file delivered by the master servicer for such Distribution Date, the certificate administrator will be required to determine if an Asset Review Trigger has occurred. If an Asset Review Trigger is determined to have occurred, the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide notice to the asset representations reviewer and to provide notice to all Certificateholders by posting a notice of its determination on its internet website and by mailing such notice to the Certificateholders’ addresses appearing in the certificate register. On each Distribution Date after providing such notice to the Certificateholders, the certificate administrator, based on information provided to it by the master servicer or the special servicer, will be required to determine whether (1) any additional Mortgage Loan has become a Delinquent Loan, (2) any Mortgage Loan has ceased to be a Delinquent Loan and (3) an Asset Review Trigger has ceased to exist, and, if there is an occurrence of any of the events or circumstances identified in clauses (1), (2) and/or (3), deliver such information in a written notice (which may be via email) within 2 business days to the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer.
An “Asset Review Trigger” will occur when either (1) Mortgage Loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of 25.0% or more of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans (including any successor REO Loans (or a portion of any REO Loan corresponding to the predecessor Mortgage Loan, in the case of a Whole Loan)) held by the issuing entity as of the end of the applicable Collection Period are Delinquent Loans or (2)(A) prior to and including the second (2nd) anniversary of the Closing Date, at least ten (10) Mortgage Loans are Delinquent Loans as of the end of the applicable Collection Period and the outstanding principal balance of such Delinquent Loans in the aggregate constitutes at least 15.0% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans (including any successor REO Loans (or a portion of any REO Loan corresponding to the predecessor Mortgage Loan, in the case of a Whole Loan)) held by the
485
issuing entity as of the end of the applicable Collection Period, or (B) after the second (2nd) anniversary of the Closing Date, at least fifteen (15) Mortgage Loans are Delinquent Loans as of the end of the applicable Collection Period and the outstanding principal balance of such Delinquent Loans in the aggregate constitutes at least 20.0% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans (including any successor REO Loans (or a portion of any REO Loan corresponding to the predecessor Mortgage Loan, in the case of a Whole Loan)) held by the issuing entity as of the end of the applicable Collection Period. The PSA will require that the certificate administrator include in the Distribution Report on Form 10-D relating to the distribution period in which the Asset Review Trigger occurred a description of the events that caused the Asset Review Trigger to occur.
We believe this Asset Review Trigger is appropriate considering the unique characteristics of pools of Mortgage Loans underlying CMBS. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of this Pool”. While we do not believe static pool information is relevant to CMBS transactions as a general matter, as a point of relative context, with respect to the forty-six (46) prior pools of commercial mortgage loans for which UBS AG, New York Branch (or its predecessors and affiliates) was a sponsor in a public offering of CMBS with a securitization closing date on or after January 1, 2008, the highest percentage of loans that were delinquent at least sixty (60) days at the end of any reporting period between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2017 was approximately 45.35%; however, the average of the delinquency percentages based on the number of mortgage loans in the reviewed transactions was 0.72%.
This pool of Mortgage Loans is not homogeneous or granular, and there are individual Mortgage Loans that each represent a significant percentage, by outstanding principal balance, of the Mortgage Pool. For example, the three (3) largest Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool represent approximately 15.9% of the Initial Pool Balance. Given this Mortgage Pool composition and the fact that CMBS pools as a general matter include a small relative number of larger mortgage loans, we believe it would not be appropriate for the delinquency of the three (15) largest Mortgage Loans, in the case of this Mortgage Pool, to cause the Asset Review Trigger to be met, as that would not necessarily be indicative of the overall quality of the Mortgage Pool. On the other hand, a significant number of delinquent Mortgage Loans by loan count could indicate an issue with the quality of the Mortgage Pool. As a result, we believe it would be appropriate to have the alternative test as set forth in clause (2) of the definition of “Asset Review Trigger”, namely to have the Asset Review Trigger be met if Mortgage Loans representing a specified percentage of the Mortgage Loans (by loan count) are Delinquent Loans, assuming those mortgage loans still meet a minimum principal balance threshold. However, given the nature of commercial mortgage loans and the inherent risks of a delinquency based solely on market conditions, a static trigger based on the number of delinquent loans would reflect a lower relative risk of an Asset Review Trigger being triggered earlier in the transaction’s lifecycle for delinquencies that are based on issues unrelated to breaches or representations and warranties and would reflect a higher relative risk later in the transaction’s lifecycle. To address this, we believe the specified percentage should increase during the life of the transaction, as provided for in clause (2) of the definition of “Asset Review Trigger”. CMBS as an asset class has historically not had a large number of claims for, or repurchases based on, breaches of representations and warranties. While the Asset Review Trigger we have selected is less than this historical peak, we feel it remains at a level that avoids a trigger based on market variability while providing an appropriate threshold to capture delinquencies that may have resulted from an underlying deficiency in one or more mortgage loan seller’s Mortgage Loans that could be
486
the basis for claims against those mortgage loan sellers based on breaches of the representations and warranties.
“Delinquent Loan” means a Mortgage Loan that is delinquent at least 60 days in respect of its Periodic Payments or balloon payment, if any, in either case such delinquency to be determined without giving effect to any grace period.
Asset Review Vote
If Certificateholders evidencing not less than 5.0% of the Voting Rights deliver to the certificate administrator, within 90 days after the filing of the Form 10-D reporting the occurrence of an Asset Review Trigger, a written direction requesting a vote to commence an Asset Review (an “Asset Review Vote Election”), the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice of such direction to all Certificateholders (with a copy to the asset representations reviewer), and to conduct a solicitation of votes of Certificateholders to authorize an Asset Review. Upon the affirmative vote to authorize an Asset Review by Certificateholders evidencing at least (i) a majority of those Certificateholders who cast votes and (ii) a majority of an Asset Review Quorum within 150 days of the receipt of the Asset Review Vote Election (an “Affirmative Asset Review Vote”), the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice of such Affirmative Asset Review Vote to all parties to the PSA, the underwriters, the mortgage loan sellers, the Directing Certificateholder and the Certificateholders. In the event an Affirmative Asset Review Vote has not occurred within such 150-day period following the receipt of the Asset Review Vote Election, no Certificateholder may request a vote or cast a vote for an Asset Review and the asset representations reviewer will not be required to review any Delinquent Loan unless and until, as applicable, (A) an additional Mortgage Loan has become a Delinquent Loan after the expiration of such 150-day period, (B) a new Asset Review Trigger has occurred as a result or an Asset Review Trigger is otherwise in effect, (C) the certificate administrator has timely received an Asset Review Vote Election after the occurrence of the events described in clauses (A) and (B) above and (D) an Affirmative Asset Review Vote has occurred within 150 days after the Asset Review Vote Election described in clause (C) above. After the occurrence of any Asset Review Vote Election or an Affirmative Asset Review Vote, no Certificateholder may make any additional Asset Review Vote Election except as described in the immediately preceding sentence. Any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote will be paid as an expense of the issuing entity from the Collection Account.
An “Asset Review Quorum” means, in connection with any solicitation of votes to authorize an Asset Review as described above, the holders of certificates evidencing at least 5.0% of the aggregate Voting Rights represented by all certificates that have Voting Rights.
Review Materials
Upon receipt of notice from the certificate administrator of an Affirmative Asset Review Vote (the “Asset Review Notice”), the custodian (with respect to clauses (i) – (v) for all Mortgage Loans), the master servicer (with respect to clause (vi) for non-Specially Serviced Loans) and the special servicer (with respect to clause (vi) for Specially Serviced Loans), in each case to the extent in such party’s possession, will be required to promptly, but in no event later than within 10 business days, provide the following materials in electronic format to the extent in their possession to the asset representations reviewer (collectively, with the Diligence Files posted to the secure data room by the certificate administrator, a
487
copy of the prospectus, a copy of each related MLPA and a copy of the PSA, the “Review Materials”):
(i) a copy of an assignment of the Mortgage in favor of the trustee, with evidence of recording thereon, for each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(ii) a copy of an assignment of any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) in favor of the trustee, with evidence of recording thereon, related to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(iii) a copy of the assignment of all unrecorded documents relating to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review, if not already covered pursuant to items (i) or (ii) above;
(iv) a copy of all filed copies (bearing evidence of filing) or evidence of filing of any UCC financing statements related to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review;
(v) a copy of an assignment in favor of the trustee of any financing statement executed and filed in the relevant jurisdiction related to each Delinquent Loan that is subject to an Asset Review; and
(vi) any other related documents that were entered into or delivered in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan that the asset representations reviewer has determined are necessary in connection with its completion of any Asset Review and that are requested by the asset representations reviewer, in the time frames and as otherwise described in the following paragraph.
In the event that, as part of an Asset Review of a Mortgage Loan, the asset representations reviewer determines that it is missing any document that is required to be part of the Review Materials for such Mortgage Loan and that is necessary in connection with its completion of the Asset Review, the asset representations reviewer will promptly, but in no event later than 10 business days after receipt of the Review Materials, notify the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans), as applicable, of such missing document(s), and request the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, promptly, but in no event later than 10 business days after receipt of notification from the asset representations reviewer, deliver to the asset representations reviewer such missing document(s) to the extent in its possession. In the event any missing documents are not provided by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, within such 10 business day period, the asset representations reviewer will be required to request such documents from the related mortgage loan seller. The mortgage loan seller will be required under the related MLPA to deliver such additional documents only to the extent such documents are in the possession of such party but in any event excluding any documents that contain information that is proprietary to the related originator or mortgage loan seller or any draft documents or privileged or internal communications.
The asset representations reviewer may, but is under no obligation to, consider and rely upon information furnished to it by a person that is not a party to the PSA or the related mortgage loan seller, and will do so only if such information can be independently verified (without unreasonable effort or expense to the asset representations reviewer) and is
488
determined by the asset representations reviewer in its good faith and sole discretion to be relevant to the Asset Review (any such information, “Unsolicited Information”), as described below.
Asset Review
Upon its receipt of the Asset Review Notice and access to the Diligence Files posted to the secure data room with respect to a Delinquent Loan, the asset representations reviewer, as an independent contractor, will be required to commence a review of the compliance of each Delinquent Loan with the representations and warranties related to that Delinquent Loan (such review, the “Asset Review”). An Asset Review of each Delinquent Loan will consist of the application of a set of pre-determined review procedures (the “Tests”) for each representation and warranty made by the applicable mortgage loan seller with respect to such Delinquent Loan; provided, however, that the asset representations reviewer may, but is under no obligation to, modify any Test and/or associated Review Materials if, and only to the extent, the asset representations reviewer determines pursuant to the Asset Review Standard that it is necessary to modify such Test and/or such associated Review Materials in order to facilitate its Asset Review in accordance with the Asset Review Standard. Once an Asset Review of a Mortgage Loan is completed, no further Asset Review will be required of or performed on that Mortgage Loan notwithstanding that such Mortgage Loan may continue to be a Delinquent Loan or become a Delinquent Loan again at the time when a new Asset Review Trigger occurs and a new Affirmative Asset Review Vote is obtained subsequent to the occurrence of such Asset Review Trigger.
“Asset Review Standard” means the performance by the asset representations reviewer of its duties under the PSA in good faith subject to the express terms of the PSA. All determinations or assumptions made by the asset representations reviewer in connection with an Asset Review are required to be made in the asset representations reviewer’s good faith discretion and judgment based on the facts and circumstances known to it at the time of such determination or assumption.
No Certificateholder will have the right to change the scope of the asset representations reviewer’s review, and the asset representations reviewer will not be required to review any information other than (i) the Review Materials and (ii) if applicable, Unsolicited Information.
The asset representations reviewer may, absent manifest error and subject to the Asset Review Standard, (i) assume, without independent investigation or verification, that the Review Materials are accurate and complete in all material respects and (ii) conclusively rely on such Review Materials.
The asset representations reviewer must prepare a preliminary report with respect to each delinquent loan within 56 days after the date on which access to the secure data room is provided by the certificate administrator. In the event that the asset representations reviewer determines that the Review Materials are insufficient to complete a Test and such missing documentation is not delivered to the asset representations reviewer by the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans), to the extent in the master servicer’s or the special servicer’s possession, or from the related mortgage loan seller within 10 business days following the request by the asset representations reviewer to the master servicer, the special servicer or the related mortgage loan seller, as the case may be, as described above, the asset representations reviewer will list such missing documents in a preliminary report setting forth the preliminary results of the application of the Tests and the reasons why such missing documents are necessary to complete a Test and (if the asset representations
489
reviewer has so concluded) that the absence of such documents will be deemed to be a failure of such Test. The asset representations reviewer will be required to provide such preliminary report to the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to all Mortgage Loans), and the related mortgage loan seller. The special servicer, if applicable, may review such preliminary report and determine whether any information contained in such preliminary report shall be labeled as “Privileged Information” and thus be excluded from the Asset Review Report and Asset Review Report Summary. If the preliminary report indicates that any of the representations and warranties fails or is deemed to fail any Test, the mortgage loan seller will have 90 days (the “Cure/Contest Period”) to remedy or otherwise refute the failure. Any documents or explanations to support the related mortgage loan seller’s claim that the representation and warranty has not failed a Test or that any missing documents in the Review Materials are not required to complete a Test will be sent by the related mortgage loan seller to the asset representations reviewer. For the avoidance of doubt, the asset representations reviewer will not be required to prepare a preliminary report in the event the asset representations reviewer determines that there is no Test failure with respect to the related Delinquent Loan.
The asset representations reviewer will be required, within 60 days after the date on which access to the secure data room is provided to the asset representations reviewer by the certificate administrator or within 10 days after the expiration of the Cure/Contest Period (whichever is later), to complete an Asset Review with respect to each Delinquent Loan and deliver (i) a report setting forth the asset representations reviewer’s findings and conclusions as to whether or not it has determined there is any evidence of a failure of any Test based on the Asset Review and a statement that the asset representations reviewer’s findings and conclusions set forth in such report were not influenced by any third party (an “Asset Review Report”) to each party to the PSA, the related mortgage loan seller for each Delinquent Loan and the Directing Certificateholder, and (ii) a summary of the asset representations reviewer’s conclusions included in such Asset Review Report (an “Asset Review Report Summary”) to the trustee and certificate administrator. The period of time by which the Asset Review Report must be completed and delivered may be extended by up to an additional 30 days, upon written notice to the parties to the PSA and the related mortgage loan seller, if the asset representations reviewer determines pursuant to the Asset Review Standard that such additional time is required due to the characteristics of the Mortgage Loans and/or the Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties. In no event will the asset representations reviewer be required to determine whether any Test failure constitutes a Material Defect, or whether the issuing entity should enforce any rights it may have against the related mortgage loan seller (or, in the case of LCF, against Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP, Series REIT of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP and Series TRS of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP in respect of their respective payment guaranties), which, in each such case, will be the responsibility of the Enforcing Servicer. See “—Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA” below. In addition, in the event that the asset representations reviewer does not receive any documentation that it requested from the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans), the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) or the related mortgage loan seller in sufficient time to allow the asset representations reviewer to complete its Asset Review and deliver an Asset Review Report, the asset representations reviewer will be required to prepare the Asset Review Report solely based on the documentation received by the asset representations reviewer with respect to the related Delinquent Loan, and the asset representations reviewer will have no responsibility to independently obtain any such documentation from any party to the PSA or otherwise. The PSA will require that the certificate administrator (i) include the Asset Review Report Summary in the Distribution Report on Form 10–D relating to the distribution period in which the Asset Review Report
490
Summary was received, and (ii) post such Asset Review Report Summary to the certificate administrator’s website not later than two business days after receipt of such Asset Review Report Summary from the asset representations reviewer.
Eligibility of Asset Representations Reviewer
The asset representations reviewer will be required to represent and warrant in the PSA that it is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. The asset representations reviewer is required to be at all times an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. If the asset representations reviewer ceases to be an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, the asset representations reviewer is required to immediately notify the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator and the Directing Certificateholder of such disqualification and immediately resign under the PSA as described under the “—Resignation of Asset Representations Reviewer” below.
An “Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer” is an institution that (i) is the special servicer, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer on a transaction rated by any of DBRS, Inc., Fitch, KBRA, Moody’s, Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC or S&P and that has not been the special servicer, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer on a transaction for which DBRS, Inc., Fitch, KBRA, Moody’s, Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC or S&P has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more classes of certificates for such transaction citing servicing or other relevant concerns with the special servicer, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer, as applicable, as the sole or material factor in such rating action, (ii) can and will make the representations and warranties of the asset representations reviewer set forth in the PSA, (iii) is not (and is not affiliated with) any sponsor, any mortgage loan seller, any originator, the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the Directing Certificateholder, the Third Party Purchaser or any of their respective affiliates, (iv) has not performed (and is not affiliated with any party hired to perform) any due diligence, loan underwriting, brokerage, borrower advisory or similar services with respect to any Mortgage Loan or any related Companion Loan prior to the Closing Date for or on behalf of any sponsor, any mortgage loan seller, any underwriter, any party to the PSA, the Directing Certificateholder or any of their respective affiliates, or have been paid any fees, compensation or other remuneration by any of them in connection with any such services and (v) that does not directly or indirectly, through one or more affiliates or otherwise, own any interest in any certificates, any Mortgage Loans, any Companion Loan or any securities backed by a Companion Loan or otherwise have any financial interest in the securitization transaction to which the PSA relates, other than in fees from its role as asset representations reviewer (or as operating advisor, if applicable) and except as otherwise set forth in the PSA.
Other Obligations of Asset Representations Reviewer
The asset representations reviewer and its affiliates are required to keep confidential any information appropriately labeled as “Privileged Information” received from any party to the PSA or any sponsor under the PSA (including, without limitation, in connection with the review of the Mortgage Loans) and not disclose such Privileged Information to any person (including Certificateholders), other than (1) to the extent expressly required by the PSA in an Asset Review Report or otherwise, to the other parties to the PSA with a notice indicating that such information is Privileged Information or (2) pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception. Each party to the PSA that receives such Privileged Information from the asset representations reviewer with a notice stating that such information is Privileged Information may not disclose such Privileged Information to any person without the prior
491
written consent of the special servicer other than pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception.
Neither the asset representations reviewer nor any of its affiliates may make any investment in any class of certificates; provided, however, that such prohibition will not apply to (i) riskless principal transactions effected by a broker dealer affiliate of the asset representations reviewer or (ii) investments by an affiliate of the asset representations reviewer if the asset representations reviewer and such affiliate maintain policies and procedures that (A) segregate personnel involved in the activities of the asset representations reviewer under the PSA from personnel involved in such affiliate’s investment activities and (B) prevent such affiliate and its personnel from gaining access to information regarding the issuing entity and the asset representations reviewer and its personnel from gaining access to such affiliate’s information regarding its investment activities.
Delegation of Asset Representations Reviewer’s Duties
The asset representations reviewer may delegate its duties to agents or subcontractors in accordance with the PSA, however, the asset representations reviewer will remain obligated and primarily liable for any Asset Review required in accordance with the provisions of the PSA without diminution of such obligation or liability by virtue of such delegation or arrangements or by virtue of indemnification from any person acting as its agents or subcontractor to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as if the asset representations reviewer alone were performing its obligations under the PSA.
Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Events
The following constitute asset representations reviewer termination events under the PSA (each, an “Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event”) whether any such event is voluntary or involuntary or is effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body:
(i) any failure by the asset representations reviewer to observe or perform in any material respect any of its covenants or agreements or the material breach of any of its representations or warranties under the PSA, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the asset representations reviewer by the trustee or to the asset representations reviewer and the trustee by the holders of certificates having greater than 25% of the Voting Rights; provided that with respect to any such failure that is not curable within such 30-day period, the asset representations reviewer will have an additional cure period of 30 days to effect such cure so long as it has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 30-day period and has provided the trustee and the certificate administrator with an officer’s certificate certifying that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, such cure;
(ii) any failure by the asset representations reviewer to perform its obligations set forth in the PSA in accordance with the Asset Review Standard in any material respect, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the asset representations reviewer by any party to the PSA;
492
(iii) any failure by the asset representations reviewer to be an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date written notice of such failure, requiring the same to be remedied, is given to the asset representations reviewer by any party to the PSA;
(iv) a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law for the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding-up or liquidation of its affairs, has been entered against the asset representations reviewer, and such decree or order has remained in force undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days;
(v) the asset representations reviewer consents to the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator or liquidation committee in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities, voluntary liquidation, or similar proceedings of or relating to the asset representations reviewer or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; or
(vi) the asset representations reviewer admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations.
Upon receipt by the certificate administrator of written notice of the occurrence of any Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event, the certificate administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders (which is required to be simultaneously delivered to the asset representations reviewer) electronically by posting such notice on its internet website and by mail, unless the certificate administrator has received notice that such Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event has been remedied.
Rights Upon Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event
If an Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event occurs, and in each and every such case, so long as such Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event has not been remedied, then either the trustee (i) may or (ii) upon the written direction of Certificateholders evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights (without regard to the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts) will be required to, terminate all of the rights and obligations of the asset representations reviewer under the PSA, other than rights and obligations accrued prior to such termination and other than indemnification rights (arising out of events occurring prior to such termination), by written notice to the asset representations reviewer. The asset representations reviewer is required to bear all reasonable costs and expenses of each other party to the PSA in connection with its termination for cause.
Termination of the Asset Representations Reviewer Without Cause
Upon (i) the written direction of Certificateholders evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights (without regard to the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts) requesting a vote to terminate and replace the asset representations reviewer with a proposed successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer, and (ii) payment by such holders to the certificate administrator
493
of the reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote, the certificate administrator will promptly provide notice to all Certificateholders and the asset representations reviewer of such request by posting such notice on its internet website, and by mailing to all Certificateholders and the asset representations reviewer. Upon the written direction of Certificateholders evidencing at least 75% of a Certificateholder Quorum (without regard to the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts), the trustee will terminate all of the rights and obligations of the asset representations reviewer under the PSA (other than any rights or obligations that accrued prior to the date of such termination and other than indemnification rights (arising out of events occurring prior to such termination)) by written notice to the asset representations reviewer, and the proposed successor asset representations reviewer will be appointed.
In the event that holders of the certificates evidencing at least 75% of the Certificateholder Quorum (without regard to the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts) elect to remove the asset representations reviewer without cause and appoint a successor, the successor asset representations reviewer will be responsible for all expenses necessary to effect the transfer of responsibilities from its predecessor.
Resignation of Asset Representations Reviewer
The asset representations reviewer may at any time resign by giving written notice to the other parties to the PSA and each Rating Agency. In addition, the asset representations reviewer will at all times be, and will be required to resign if it fails to be, an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer by giving written notice to the other parties. Upon such notice of resignation, the depositor will be required to promptly appoint a successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. No resignation of the asset representations reviewer will be effective until a successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer has been appointed and accepted the appointment. If no successor asset representations reviewer has been so appointed and accepted the appointment within 30 days after the notice of resignation, the resigning asset representations reviewer may petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor asset representations reviewer that is an Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer. The resigning asset representations reviewer must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
Asset Representations Reviewer Compensation
Certain fees will be payable to the asset representations reviewer, and the asset representations reviewer will be entitled to be reimbursed for certain expenses, as described under “—Servicing and Other Compensation and Payment of Expenses”.
Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause
Except as limited by certain conditions described in this prospectus and subject to the rights of the holder of the related Companion Loan under the related Intercreditor Agreement, the special servicer may generally be replaced, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, at any time and without cause, by the Directing Certificateholder so long as, among other things, the Directing Certificateholder appoints a replacement special servicer that meets the requirements of the PSA, including that the trustee and the certificate administrator receive a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency and confirmation from the applicable rating agencies that such replacement will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current ratings of any class of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities and that such
494
replacement special servicer may not be the asset representations reviewer or any of its affiliates. The reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of any such termination incurred by the Directing Certificateholder (other than a Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder) without cause (including the costs of obtaining a Rating Agency Confirmation) will be paid by the holders of the Controlling Class.
After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, upon (i) the written direction of holders of Principal Balance Certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balances) of the Principal Balance Certificates requesting a vote to replace the special servicer with a new special servicer, (ii) payment by such holders to the certificate administrator of the reasonable fees and expenses (including any legal fees and any Rating Agency fees and expenses) to be incurred by the certificate administrator in connection with administering such vote (which fees and expenses will not be additional trust fund expenses), and (iii) delivery by such holders to the certificate administrator and the trustee of Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency (such Rating Agency Confirmation will be obtained at the expense of those holders of certificates requesting such vote) and confirmation from the applicable rating agencies that the contemplated appointment or replacement will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current ratings of any class of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities, the certificate administrator will be required to post notice of the same on the certificate administrator’s website and concurrently by mail and conduct the solicitation of votes of all certificates in such regard, which requisite affirmative votes must be received within 180 days of the posting of such notice. Upon the written direction of holders of Principal Balance Certificates evidencing at least 66-2/3% of a Certificateholder Quorum, the trustee will be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the special servicer under the PSA and appoint the successor special servicer (which must be a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer) designated by such Certificateholders, subject to indemnification, right to outstanding fees, reimbursement of Advances and other rights set forth in the PSA, which survive such termination. The certificate administrator will include on each Distribution Date Statement a statement that each Certificateholder may access such notices via the certificate administrator’s website and that each Certificateholder may register to receive electronic mail notifications when such notices are posted thereon.
A “Certificateholder Quorum” means the holders of certificates evidencing at least 50% of the aggregate Voting Rights (taking into account the application of Realized Losses and, other than with respect to the termination of the asset representations reviewer, the application of any Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the Certificate Balance of the certificates) of all Principal Balance Certificates on an aggregate basis.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the special servicer obtains knowledge that it has become a Borrower Party with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan (any such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan, an “Excluded Special Servicer Loan”), the special servicer will be required to resign as special servicer of that Excluded Special Servicer Loan. Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, if the applicable Excluded Special Servicer Loan is not also an Excluded Loan, the Directing Certificateholder will be required to select a successor special servicer that is not a Borrower Party in accordance with the terms of the PSA (the “Excluded Special Servicer”) for the related Excluded Special Servicer Loan. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, if at any time the applicable Excluded Special Servicer Loan is also an Excluded Loan or if the Directing Certificateholder is entitled to appoint the Excluded
495
Special Servicer but does not so appoint within 30 days of notice of such resignation, the resigning special servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to select the related Excluded Special Servicer. The special servicer will not have any liability with respect to the actions or inactions of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer or with respect to the identity of the applicable Excluded Special Servicer so long as, on the date of the appointment, the selected Excluded Special Servicer is a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer. It will be a condition to any such appointment that (i) the Rating Agencies confirm that the appointment would not result in a qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of any of their then-current ratings of the certificates and the equivalent from each NRSRO hired to provide ratings with respect to any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, (ii) the applicable Excluded Special Servicer is a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer and (iii) the applicable Excluded Special Servicer delivers to the depositor and the certificate administrator and any applicable depositor and certificate administrator of any other securitization, if applicable, that contains a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, the information, if any, required pursuant to Item 6.02 of the Form 8-K regarding itself in its role as Excluded Special Servicer.
If at any time the special servicer is no longer a Borrower Party with respect to an Excluded Special Servicer Loan (including, without limitation, as a result of the related Mortgaged Property becoming REO Property), (1) the related Excluded Special Servicer will be required to resign, (2) the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan will no longer be an Excluded Special Servicer Loan, (3) the special servicer will become the special servicer again for such related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan and (4) the special servicer will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan earned during such time on and after such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan is no longer an Excluded Special Servicer Loan.
The applicable Excluded Special Servicer will be required to perform all of the obligations of the special servicer for the related Excluded Special Servicer Loan and will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such Excluded Special Servicer Loan earned during such time as the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Whole Loan is an Excluded Special Servicer Loan (provided that the special servicer will remain entitled to all other special servicing compensation with respect to all Mortgage Loans and Serviced Whole Loans that are not Excluded Special Servicer Loans during such time).
A “Qualified Replacement Special Servicer” is a replacement special servicer that (i) satisfies all of the eligibility requirements applicable to the special servicer in the PSA, (ii) is not the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or an affiliate of the operating advisor or the asset representations reviewer (and, if appointed by the Directing Certificateholder or with the approval of the requisite vote of certificateholders following the operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer as described in “—Replacement of Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote” below, is not the originally replaced special servicer or its affiliate), (iii) is not obligated to pay the operating advisor (x) any fees or otherwise compensate the operating advisor in respect of its obligations under the PSA, or (y) for the appointment of the successor special servicer or the recommendation by the operating advisor for the replacement special servicer to become the special servicer, (iv) is not entitled to receive any compensation from the operating advisor other than compensation that is not material and is unrelated to the operating advisor’s recommendation that such party be appointed as the replacement special servicer, (v) is not entitled to receive any fee from the operating advisor for its appointment as successor special servicer, in each case, unless expressly approved by 100% of the Certificateholders, (vi) currently has a special servicer rating of at least “CSS3” from Fitch, (vii) is currently acting as a special servicer in a CMBS transaction
496
rated by Moody’s (as to which CMBS transaction there are outstanding CMBS rated by Moody’s), and (viii) is not a special servicer that has been cited by Moody’s or KBRA as having servicing concerns as the sole or a material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in a transaction serviced by the applicable servicer prior to the time of determination.
Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote
If the operating advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that (1) the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the PSA or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard and (2) the replacement of the special servicer would be in the best interest of the certificateholders as a collective whole, then the operating advisor will have the right to recommend the replacement of the special servicer. In such event, the operating advisor will be required to deliver to the trustee and the certificate administrator, with a copy to the special servicer, a written report detailing the reasons supporting its recommendation (along with relevant information justifying its recommendation) and recommending a suggested replacement special servicer (which must be a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer). The certificate administrator will be required to notify each Certificateholder of the recommendation and post the related report on the certificate administrator’s internet website, and to conduct the solicitation of votes with respect to such recommendation. Approval by the Certificateholders of such Qualified Replacement Special Servicer will not preclude the Directing Certificateholder from appointing a replacement, so long as such replacement is a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer and is not the originally replaced special servicer or its affiliate.
The operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer must be confirmed within 180 days of the report being posted to the certificate administrator’s internet website by an affirmative vote of holders of Certificates evidencing at least a majority of a quorum of Certificateholders (which, for this purpose, is the holders of Certificates that (i) evidence at least 20% of the Voting Rights (taking into account the application of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts to notionally reduce the respective Certificate Balances) of all Principal Balance Certificates on an aggregate basis, and (ii) consist of at least three Certificateholders or Certificate Owners that are not affiliated with each other). In the event the holders of Principal Balance Certificates evidencing at least a majority of a quorum of Certificateholders elect to remove and replace the special servicer (which requisite affirmative votes must be received within 180 days of the posting of the notice of the operating advisor’s recommendation to replace the special servicer to the certificate administrator’s website), the certificate administrator will be required to receive a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies at that time, and confirmation from the applicable rating agencies that such replacement will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current ratings of any class of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities. In the event the certificate administrator receives a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies (and the successor special servicer agrees to be bound by the terms of the PSA), the trustee will then be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the special servicer under the PSA and to appoint the successor special servicer approved by the holders of Certificates evidencing at least a majority of a quorum of Certificateholders, provided such successor special servicer is a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer, subject to the terminated special servicer’s rights to indemnification, payment of outstanding fees, reimbursement of Advances and other rights set forth in the PSA that survive termination. The reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and expenses of outside
497
counsel) associated with obtaining such Rating Agency Confirmations and administering the vote of the applicable holders of the Certificates and the operating advisor’s identification of a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer will be an additional trust fund expense.
In any case, the trustee will notify the outgoing special servicer promptly of the effective date of its termination. Any replacement special servicer recommended by the operating advisor must be a Qualified Replacement Special Servicer.
No appointment of the special servicer will be effective until the depositor or the depositor for the securitization of a Companion Loan has filed any required Exchange Act filings related to the removal and replacement of the special servicer.
With respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loans, the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer may be removed, and a successor special servicer appointed at any time by the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder (and not by the Directing Certificateholder for this transaction) to the extent set forth in the related Non-Serviced PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement for such Non-Serviced Whole Loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans” and “—Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans” below.
The terms of the PSA described above under “—Replacement of the Special Servicer Without Cause” and this “—Replacement of the Special Servicer After Operating Advisor Recommendation and Certificateholder Vote” regarding the replacement of the special servicer without cause will not apply with respect to a Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan. Rather, with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loans: (i) prior to the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, the holder of the related Controlling Companion Loan will have the right to replace the special servicer then acting with respect to the Servicing Shift Whole Loan and appoint a replacement special servicer, solely with respect to such Servicing Shift Whole Loan; and (ii) on and after the related Servicing Shift Securitization Date, pursuant to the terms of the related Intercreditor Agreement, the “directing holder” (or analogous term) under the related Servicing Shift PSA will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer then acting with respect to such Servicing Shift Whole Loan and appoint a replacement special servicer without the consent of the holder of such Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan.
Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause
Servicer Termination Events
A “Servicer Termination Event” under the PSA with respect to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, will include, without limitation:
(a) (i) any failure by the master servicer to make any deposit required to be made by the master servicer to the Collection Account or remit to the companion paying agent for deposit into the Companion Distribution Account on the day and by the time such deposit or remittance is first required to be made, which failure is not remedied within one business day, or (ii) any failure by the master servicer to deposit into, or remit to the certificate administrator for deposit into, the Distribution Account any amount required to be so deposited or remitted, which failure is not remedied by 11:00 a.m. New York City time on the relevant Distribution Date;
(b) any failure by the special servicer to deposit into the REO Account within one business day after the day such deposit is required to be made, or to remit to the master servicer for deposit in the Collection Account, or any other account required
498
under the PSA, any amount required to be so deposited or remitted by the special servicer pursuant to, and at the time specified by, the PSA;
(c) any failure on the part of the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, duly to observe or perform in any material respect any of its other covenants or obligations under the PSA, which failure continues unremedied for 30 days (or (i) with respect to any year that a report on Form 10-K is required to be filed, 5 business days in the case of the master servicer’s or special servicer’s obligations, as the case may be, under the PSA in respect of Exchange Act reporting items (after any applicable grace periods), (ii) 15 days in the case of the master servicer’s failure to make a Servicing Advance or (iii) 15 days in the case of a failure to pay the premium for any property insurance policy required to be maintained under the PSA) after written notice of the failure has been given (A) to the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, by any other party to the PSA, or (B) to the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, with a copy to each other party to the related PSA, by Certificateholders evidencing not less than 25% of all Voting Rights or, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan if affected by that failure, by the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan; provided, however, that if that failure is capable of being cured and the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, is diligently pursuing that cure, such period will be extended an additional 30 days; provided, further, however, that such extended period will not apply to the obligations regarding Exchange Act reporting;
(d) any breach on the part of the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, of any representation or warranty in the PSA that materially and adversely affects the interests of any class of Certificateholders or holders of any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan and that continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which notice of that breach, requiring the same to be remedied, will have been given to the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, by the depositor, the certificate administrator or the trustee, or to the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator and the trustee by the Certificateholders evidencing not less than 25% of Voting Rights or, with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan affected by such breach, by the holder of the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan; provided, however, that if that breach is capable of being cured and the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, is diligently pursuing that cure, that 30-day period will be extended an additional 30 days;
(e) certain events of insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings in respect of or relating to the master servicer or special servicer, and certain actions by or on behalf of the master servicer or special servicer indicating its insolvency or inability to pay its obligations;
(f) either Moody’s or KBRA (or, in the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, any Companion Loan Rating Agency) (i) has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more classes of certificates (or Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities, as applicable), or (ii) has placed one or more classes of certificates (or Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities, as applicable) on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal (and in the case of clause (i) or (ii), such action has not been withdrawn by Moody’s or KBRA within 60 days of such rating action) and, in the case of either of clauses (i) or (ii), such Rating Agency publicly cited servicing concerns with the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, as the sole or a material factor in such rating action; or
499
(g) the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, is no longer rated at least “CMS3” or “CSS3”, respectively, by Fitch and such master servicer or special servicer is not reinstated to at least that rating within 60 days of the delisting.
“Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities” means, for so long as the related Mortgage Loan or any successor REO Loan is part of the Mortgage Pool, any class of securities issued by another securitization and backed by a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan.
Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event
If a Servicer Termination Event occurs with respect to the master servicer or the special servicer under the PSA, then, so long as the Servicer Termination Event remains unremedied, the depositor or the trustee will be authorized, and at the written direction of Certificateholders entitled to more than 25% of the Voting Rights or, for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Directing Certificateholder (solely with respect to the special servicer and other than with respect to an Excluded Loan), the trustee will be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the defaulting party as master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be (other than certain rights in respect of indemnification and certain items of servicing compensation), under the PSA. The trustee will then succeed to all of the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the defaulting party as master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, under the PSA and will be entitled to similar compensation arrangements. If the trustee is unwilling or unable to so act, it may (or, at the written request of Certificateholders entitled to a majority of the Voting Rights, or if it is not approved as a servicer by the applicable rating agencies or, for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than in respect of an applicable Excluded Loan, the Directing Certificateholder, it will be required to) appoint, or petition a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint, any established mortgage loan servicing institution, subject to the trustee’s receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and confirmation from the applicable rating agencies that such appointment (or replacement) will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current ratings of any class of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities and, with respect to a successor special servicer, for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and other than with respect to an Excluded Loan, that has been approved by the Directing Certificateholder, which approval may not be unreasonably withheld. In addition, none of the asset representations reviewer, the operating advisor and their respective affiliates may be appointed as a successor master servicer or special servicer.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the section above, if a Servicer Termination Event on the part of the special servicer remains unremedied and affects the holder of a Serviced Companion Loan, and the special servicer has not otherwise been terminated, the holder of such Serviced Companion Loan (or, if applicable, the related trustee, acting at the direction of the related directing certificateholder (or similar entity)) will be entitled to direct the trustee to terminate the special servicer solely with respect to the related Serviced Whole Loan. The appointment (or replacement) of the special servicer with respect to a Serviced Whole Loan will in any event be subject to Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency and confirmation from the applicable rating agencies that such appointment (or replacement) will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current ratings of any class of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities. A replacement special servicer will be selected by the trustee or, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, by the Directing Certificateholder; provided, however, that any successor special servicer
500
appointed to replace the special servicer with respect to a Serviced Mortgage Loan cannot at any time be the person (or an affiliate of such person) that was terminated at the direction of the holder of the related Serviced Companion Loan, without the prior written consent of such holder of the related Serviced Companion Loan.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the section above, if a servicer termination event on the part of a Non-Serviced Special Servicer remains unremedied and affects the issuing entity, and such Non-Serviced Special Servicer has not otherwise been terminated, the trustee, acting at the direction of the Directing Certificateholder, will generally be entitled to direct the related Non-Serviced Trustee to terminate such Non-Serviced Special Servicer, as applicable, solely with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan(s), and a successor will be appointed in accordance with the related Non-Serviced PSA.
In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the section described above, if the master servicer receives notice of termination solely due to a Servicer Termination Event described in clause (f) or (g) under “—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” above, and prior to being replaced as described in the third preceding paragraph, the master servicer will have 45 days after receipt of the notice of termination to find, and sell its rights and obligations to, a successor master servicer that meets the requirements of the master servicer under the PSA.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) if any Servicer Termination Event on the part of the master servicer affects a Serviced Companion Loan, the related holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan or the rating on any class of securities backed, wholly or partially, by any Serviced Companion Loan (“Serviced Companion Loan Securities”), and if the master servicer is not otherwise terminated, or (2) if any Servicer Termination Event on the part of the master servicer affects only a Serviced Companion Loan, the related holder of a Serviced Companion Loan or the rating on any Serviced Companion Loan Securities, then the master servicer may not be terminated by or at the direction of the related holder of such Serviced Companion Loan or the holders of any Serviced Companion Loan Securities, but upon the written direction of the related holder of such Serviced Companion Loan, the master servicer will be required to appoint a sub-servicer that will be responsible for servicing the related Serviced Whole Loan.
Further, if replaced as a result of a Servicer Termination Event, the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, will be responsible for the costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
Waiver of Servicer Termination Event
The Certificateholders representing at least 66-2/3% of the Voting Rights allocated to certificates affected by any Servicer Termination Event may waive such Servicer Termination Event; provided, however, that a Servicer Termination Event under clause (a), (b) or (f) of the definition of “Servicer Termination Event” may be waived only with the consent of all of the Certificateholders of the affected classes and a Servicer Termination Event under clause (c) of the definition of “Servicer Termination Event” relating to Exchange Act reporting may be waived only with the consent of the depositor. Upon any such waiver of a Servicer Termination Event, such Servicer Termination Event will cease to exist and will be deemed to have been remedied. Upon any such waiver of a Servicer Termination Event by Certificateholders, the trustee and the certificate administrator will be entitled to recover all costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with enforcement actions taken with respect to such Servicer Termination Event prior to such waiver from the issuing entity.
501
Resignation of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer
The PSA permits the master servicer and the special servicer to resign from their respective obligations only upon (a) the appointment of, and the acceptance of the appointment by, a successor (which may be appointed by the resigning master servicer or special servicer, as applicable) and receipt by the certificate administrator and the trustee of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation required under the PSA may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus); and, as to the special servicer only, for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the approval of such successor by the Directing Certificateholder, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or (b) a determination that their respective obligations are no longer permissible with respect to the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, under applicable law. In the event that the master servicer or special servicer resigns as a result of the determination that their respective obligations are no longer permissible under applicable law, the trustee will then succeed to all of the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the defaulting party as master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, under the PSA and will be entitled to similar compensation arrangements. If the trustee is unwilling or unable to so act, it may appoint, or petition a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint, a mortgage loan servicing institution, subject to the trustee’s receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation required under the PSA may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus) and, with respect to a successor special servicer, for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, which has been approved by the Directing Certificateholder, which approval may not be unreasonably withheld.
No resignation will become effective until the trustee or other successor has assumed the obligations and duties of the resigning master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, under the PSA. Further, the resigning master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, must pay all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties. Other than as described under “—Termination of the Master Servicer or Special Servicer for Cause—Servicer Termination Events” above, in no event will the master servicer or the special servicer have the right to appoint any successor master servicer or special servicer if the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, is terminated or removed pursuant to the PSA. In addition, the PSA will prohibit the appointment of the asset representations reviewer, the operating advisor or one of their respective affiliates as successor to the master servicer or special servicer.
Limitation on Liability; Indemnification
The PSA will provide that none of the master servicer (including in any capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or any partner, shareholder, member, manager, director, officer, employee or agent of any of them will be under any liability to the issuing entity, Certificateholders or holders of the related Companion Loan, as applicable, for any action taken, or not taken, in good faith pursuant to the PSA or for errors in judgment;
502
provided, however, that none of the master servicer (including in any capacity as the paying agent for any Serviced Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or similar person will be protected against any breach of a representation or warranty made by such party, as applicable, in the PSA or any liability that would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of obligations or duties under the PSA or by reason of negligent disregard of such obligations and duties. For the purposes of indemnification of the master servicer or the special servicer and limitation of liability, the master servicer or special servicer will be deemed not to have engaged in willful misconduct or committed bad faith or negligence in the performance of its respective obligations and duties under the PSA or acted in negligent disregard of such obligations and duties if the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, fails to follow the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents because the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, determines that compliance with any Mortgage Loan documents would or potentially would cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or cause the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust or cause a tax to be imposed on the trust or any Trust REMIC or the Grantor Trust under the relevant provisions of the Code (for which determination, the master servicer and special servicer will be entitled to rely on advice of counsel, the cost of which will be reimbursed as an additional trust fund expense). The PSA will also provide that the master servicer (including in any capacity as the paying agent for any Serviced Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer and their respective affiliates and any partner, shareholder, member, manager, director, officer, employee or agent of any of them will be entitled to indemnification by the issuing entity against any claims, losses, penalties, fines, forfeitures, reasonable legal fees and related costs, judgments, and other costs, liabilities, fees and expenses incurred in connection with any actual or threatened legal or administrative action or claim that relates to the PSA, the Mortgage Loans, any related Serviced Companion Loan, the issuing entity or the certificates; provided, however, that the indemnification will not extend to any loss, liability or expense specifically required to be borne by such party pursuant to the terms the PSA, incurred in connection with any breach of a representation or warranty made by such party, as applicable, in the PSA or incurred by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of obligations or duties under the PSA, by reason of negligent disregard of such party’s obligations or duties, or in the case of the depositor and any of its partners, shareholders, directors, officers, members, managers, employees and agents, any violation by any of them of any state or federal securities law. In addition, absent actual fraud (as determined by a final non-appealable court order), neither the trustee nor the certificate administrator (including its capacity as custodian) will be liable for special, punitive, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever (including but not limited to lost profits), even if the trustee or the certificate administrator has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action.
The PSA will also provide that any master servicer, depositor, special servicer, operating advisor (or the equivalent), asset representations reviewer, paying agent or trustee under any Non-Serviced PSA with respect to a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and any partner, director, officer, shareholder, member, manager, employee or agent of any of them, will be entitled to indemnification by the issuing entity and held harmless against the issuing entity’s pro rata share (subject to the applicable Intercreditor Agreement) of any and all claims, losses, penalties, fines, forfeitures, legal fees and related costs, judgments and any other costs, liabilities, fees and expenses incurred in connection with servicing and administration of such Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and the related Mortgaged Property (as and to the same extent the securitization trust formed under the related Non-Serviced PSA is required to indemnify such parties in respect of other mortgage loans in the securitization
503
trust formed under the related Non-Serviced PSA pursuant to the terms of such Non-Serviced PSA).
In addition, the PSA will provide that none of the master servicer (including in any capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer will be under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal or administrative action, proceeding, hearing or examination that is not incidental to its respective duties under the PSA or that in its opinion may involve it in any expense or liability not recoverable from the issuing entity. However, each of the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer will be permitted, in the exercise of its discretion, to undertake any action, proceeding, hearing or examination that it may deem necessary or desirable with respect to the enforcement and/or protection of the rights and duties of the parties to the PSA and the interests of the Certificateholders (and, in the case of a Serviced Whole Loan, the rights of the Certificateholders and the holders of the related Serviced Companion Loan (as a collective whole), taking into account the subordinate or pari passu nature of such Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) under the PSA; provided, however, that if a Serviced Whole Loan and/or the holder of the related Companion Loan are involved, such expenses, costs and liabilities will be payable out of funds related to such Serviced Whole Loan in accordance with the related Intercreditor Agreement and will also be payable out of the other funds in the Collection Account if amounts on deposit with respect to such Serviced Whole Loan are insufficient therefor. If any such expenses, costs or liabilities relate to a Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, then any subsequent recovery on that Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, as applicable, will be used to reimburse the issuing entity for any amounts advanced for the payment of such expenses, costs or liabilities. In that event, the legal expenses and costs of the action, proceeding, hearing or examination and any liability resulting therefrom, will be expenses, costs and liabilities of the issuing entity, and the master servicer (including in its capacity as the paying agent for any Companion Loan), the special servicer, the depositor, the asset representations reviewer or the operating advisor, as the case may be, will be entitled to be reimbursed out of the Collection Account for the expenses.
Pursuant to the PSA, the master servicer and the special servicer will each be required to maintain a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy or their equivalent with a qualified insurer that provides coverage against losses that may be sustained as a result of an officer’s or employee’s misappropriation of funds or errors and omissions, subject to certain limitations as to amount of coverage, deductible amounts, conditions, exclusions and exceptions permitted by the PSA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the master servicer and special servicer will be allowed to self-insure with respect to an errors and omissions policy and a fidelity bond so long as certain conditions set forth in the PSA are met.
Any person into which the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor, or asset representations reviewer may be merged or consolidated, or any person resulting from any merger or consolidation to which the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer is a party, or any person succeeding to the business of the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer, will be the successor of the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, operating advisor or asset representations reviewer, as the case may be, under the PSA, subject to certain conditions set forth in the PSA. The master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor and the asset representations reviewer may have other normal business relationships with the depositor or the depositor’s affiliates.
504
The trustee and the certificate administrator make no representations as to the validity or sufficiency of the PSA (other than as to it being a valid obligation of the trustee and the certificate administrator), the certificates, the Mortgage Loans, this prospectus (other than as to the accuracy of the information provided by the trustee and the certificate administrator as set forth above) or any related documents and will not be accountable for the use or application by the depositor of any of the certificates issued to it or of the proceeds of such certificates, or for the use or application of any funds paid to the depositor in respect of the assignment of the Mortgage Loans to the issuing entity, or any funds deposited in or withdrawn from the Collection Account or any other account by or on behalf of the depositor, either the master servicer, the special servicer or, in the case of the trustee, the certificate administrator. The PSA provides that no provision of such agreement will be construed to relieve the trustee and the certificate administrator from liability for their own negligent action, their own negligent failure to act or their own willful misconduct or bad faith.
The PSA provides that neither the trustee nor the certificate administrator, as applicable, will be liable for an error of judgment made in good faith by a responsible officer of the trustee or the certificate administrator, unless it is proven that the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable, was negligent in ascertaining the pertinent facts. In addition, neither the trustee nor the certificate administrator, as applicable, will be liable with respect to any action taken, suffered or omitted to be taken by it in good faith in accordance with the direction of holders of certificates entitled to greater than 25% of the percentage interest of each affected class, or if each class is an affected class of the aggregate Voting Rights of the certificates, relating to the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee and the certificate administrator, or exercising any trust or power conferred upon the trustee and the certificate administrator, under the PSA (unless a higher percentage of Voting Rights is required for such action).
The trustee and the certificate administrator and any director, officer, employee, representative or agent of the trustee and the certificate administrator, will be entitled to indemnification by the issuing entity, to the extent of amounts held in the Collection Account or the Lower-Tier REMIC Distribution Account from time to time, for any loss, liability, damages, claims or unanticipated expenses (including without limitation, costs and expenses of litigation, and of investigation, counsel fees, damages, judgements and amounts paid in settlement, and expenses incurred in becoming the successor to the master servicer or the special servicer, to the extent no otherwise paid under the PSA) arising out of or incurred by the trustee or the certificate administrator in connection with their participation in the transaction and any act or omission of the trustee or the certificate administrator relating to the exercise and performance of any of the powers and duties of the trustee and the certificate administrator (including in any capacities in which they serve, e.g., paying agent, REMIC administrator, authenticating agent, custodian, certificate registrar and 17g-5 Information Provider) under the PSA. However, the indemnification will not extend to any loss, liability or expense that constitutes a specific liability imposed on the trustee or the certificate administrator pursuant to the PSA, or to any loss, liability or expense incurred by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence on the part of the trustee or the certificate administrator in the performance of their obligations and duties under the PSA, or by reason of their negligent disregard of those obligations or duties, or as may arise from a breach of any representation or warranty of the trustee or the certificate administrator made in the PSA.
For the avoidance of doubt, with respect to any indemnification provisions in the PSA providing that the issuing entity or a party to the PSA is required to indemnify another party to the PSA for costs, fees and expenses, such costs, fees and expenses are intended to
505
include costs (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses) of the enforcement of such indemnity.
The rights and protections afforded to the trustee and the certificate administrator as set forth above and under the PSA will also apply to the custodian.
Enforcement of Mortgage Loan Seller’s Obligations Under the MLPA
In the event any party to the PSA receives a request or demand from a Requesting Certificateholder to the effect that a Mortgage Loan should be repurchased or replaced due to a Material Defect, or if such party to the PSA determines that a Mortgage Loan should be repurchased or replaced due to a Material Defect, that party to the PSA will be required to promptly forward such request or demand to the master servicer and special servicer, and the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, will be required to promptly forward it to the related mortgage loan seller. The Enforcing Servicer will be required to enforce the obligations of the mortgage loan sellers under the MLPAs pursuant to the terms of the PSA and the MLPAs. These obligations include obligations resulting from a Material Defect. Subject to the provisions of the applicable MLPA relating to the dispute resolutions as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, such enforcement, including, without limitation, the legal prosecution of claims, if any, will be required to be carried out in accordance with the Servicing Standard.
Within 45 days after receipt of an Asset Review Report with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) will be required to determine whether at that time, based on the Servicing Standard, there exists a Material Defect with respect to such Mortgage Loan. If the master servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) determines that a Material Defect exists, the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, will be required to enforce the obligations of the applicable mortgage loan seller under the MLPA with respect to such Material Defect as discussed in the preceding paragraph. See “—The Asset Representations Reviewer—Asset Review” above.
Any costs incurred by the master servicer or the special servicer with respect to the enforcement of the obligations of a mortgage loan seller under the applicable MLPA will be deemed to be Servicing Advances, to the extent not recovered from the mortgage loan seller or the Requesting Certificateholder. See “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements—Dispute Resolution Provisions”.
Dispute Resolution Provisions
Certificateholder’s Rights When a Repurchase Request Is Initially Delivered by a Certificateholder
In the event an Initial Requesting Certificateholder delivers a written request to a party to the PSA that a Mortgage Loan be repurchased by the applicable mortgage loan seller alleging the existence of a Material Defect with respect to such Mortgage Loan and setting forth the basis for such allegation (a “Certificateholder Repurchase Request”), the receiving party will be required to promptly forward that Certificateholder Repurchase Request to the master servicer and the special servicer, and the Enforcing Servicer will be required to promptly forward it to the applicable mortgage loan seller and each other party to the PSA. An “Initial Requesting Certificateholder” is the first Certificateholder or Certificate Owner to deliver a Certificateholder Repurchase Request as described above with respect to a
506
Mortgage Loan, and there may not be more than one Initial Requesting Certificateholder with respect to any Mortgage Loan. Subject to the provisions described below under this heading “—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, the Enforcing Servicer will be the Enforcing Party with respect to the Certificateholder Repurchase Request.
The “Enforcing Servicer” will be (a) with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan, the special servicer, and (b) with respect to a non-Specially Serviced Loan, (i) in the case of a Repurchase Request made by the special servicer, the Directing Certificateholder or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, the master servicer, and (ii) in the case of a Repurchase Request made by any person other than the special servicer, the Directing Certificateholder or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, (A) prior to the Resolution Failure relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer, and (B) from and after a Resolution Failure relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan, the special servicer.
An “Enforcing Party” is the person obligated to or that elects pursuant to the terms of the PSA to enforce the rights of the issuing entity against the related mortgage loan seller with respect to a Repurchase Request.
Repurchase Request Delivered by a Party to the PSA
In the event that the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor (solely in its capacity as operating advisor) or the Directing Certificateholder (other than any Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder) identifies a Material Defect with respect to a Mortgage Loan, that party will be required to deliver prompt written notice of such Material Defect to each other party to the PSA and the applicable mortgage loan seller, identifying the applicable Mortgage Loan and setting forth the basis for such allegation (a “PSA Party Repurchase Request” and, each of a Certificateholder Repurchase Request or a PSA Party Repurchase Request, a “Repurchase Request”). The Enforcing Servicer will be required to act as the Enforcing Party and enforce the rights of the issuing entity against the related mortgage loan seller with respect to the PSA Party Repurchase Request. However, if a Resolution Failure occurs with respect to the PSA Party Repurchase Request, the provisions described below under “—Resolution of a Repurchase Request” will apply.
In the event the Repurchase Request is not Resolved within 180 days after the mortgage loan seller receives the Repurchase Request (a “Resolution Failure”), then the provisions described below under “—Resolution of a Repurchase Request” will apply. Receipt of the Repurchase Request will be deemed to occur 2 business days after the Repurchase Request is sent to the related mortgage loan seller. A Resolved Repurchase Request will not preclude the master servicer (in the case of non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the special servicer (in the case of Specially Serviced Loans) from exercising any of their respective rights related to a Material Defect in the manner and timing otherwise set forth in the PSA, in the related MLPA or as provided by law. “Resolved” means, with respect to a Repurchase Request, (i) that the related Material Defect has been cured, (ii) the related Mortgage Loan has been repurchased in accordance with the related MLPA, (iii) a mortgage loan has been substituted for the related Mortgage Loan in accordance with the related MLPA, (iv) the applicable mortgage loan seller has made a Loss of Value Payment, (v) a contractually binding agreement is entered into between the Enforcing Servicer, on behalf of the issuing entity, and the related mortgage loan seller that settles the related mortgage loan seller’s obligations under the related MLPA or (vi) the related Mortgage Loan is no longer property of the issuing entity as a result of a sale or other disposition in accordance with the PSA.
Within 2 business days after a Resolution Failure occurs with respect to a Repurchase Request made by any person other than the special servicer, the Directing Certificateholder
507
or a Controlling Class Certificateholder relating to a non-Specially Serviced Loan, the master servicer will be required to send a written notice (a “Master Servicer Proposed Course of Action Notice”) to the special servicer, indicating the master servicer’s analysis and recommended course of action with respect to such Repurchase Request, along with the servicing file and all information, documents and records (including records stored electronically on computer tapes, magnetic discs and the like) relating to such non-Specially Serviced Loan and, if applicable, the related Serviced Companion Loan, either in the master servicer’s possession or otherwise reasonably available to the master servicer without undue burden or expense, and reasonably requested by the special servicer to the extent set forth in the PSA for such non-Specially Serviced Loan. Upon receipt of such Master Servicer Proposed Course of Action Notice and such servicing file, the special servicer will become the Enforcing Servicer with respect to such Repurchase Request.
Resolution of a Repurchase Request
After a Resolution Failure occurs with respect to a Repurchase Request regarding a Mortgage Loan (whether the Repurchase Request was initiated by an Initial Requesting Certificateholder, a party to the PSA or the Directing Certificateholder), the Enforcing Servicer will be required to send a notice (a “Proposed Course of Action Notice”) to the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, to the address specified in the Initial Requesting Certificateholder’s Repurchase Request, and to the certificate administrator who will make such notice available to all other Certificateholders and Certificate Owners (by posting such notice on the certificate administrator’s website) indicating the Enforcing Servicer’s intended course of action with respect to the Repurchase Request (a “Proposed Course of Action”). If the master servicer is the Enforcing Servicer, the master servicer may (but will not be obligated to) consult with the special servicer and (for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) the Directing Certificateholder regarding any Proposed Course of Action. Such notice will be required to include (a) a request to Certificateholders to indicate their agreement with or dissent from such Proposed Course of Action by clearly marking “agree” or “disagree” to the Proposed Course of Action on such notice within 30 days of the date of such notice and a disclaimer that responses received after such 30-day period will not be taken into consideration, (b) a statement that if any responding Certificateholder disagrees with the Proposed Course of Action, the Enforcing Servicer will be compelled to follow (either as the Enforcing Party or as the Enforcing Servicer in circumstances where a Certificateholder is acting as the Enforcing Party) the course of action agreed to and/or proposed by the majority of responding Certificateholders that involves referring the matter to mediation or arbitration, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedures relating to the delivery of Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notices and Final Dispute Resolution Election Notices described in this prospectus, (c) a statement that responding Certificateholders will be required to certify their holdings in connection with such response, (d) a statement that only responses clearly marked “agree” or “disagree” with such Proposed Course of Action will be taken into consideration and (e) instructions for responding Certificateholders to send their responses to the Enforcing Servicer and the certificate administrator. The certificate administrator will within three (3) business days after the expiration of the 30-day response period, tabulate the responses received from the Certificateholders and share the results with the Enforcing Servicer. The certificate administrator will only count responses timely received that clearly indicate agreement or dissent with the related Proposed Course of Action and additional verbiage or qualifying language will not be taken into consideration for purposes of determining whether the related Certificateholder agrees or disagrees with the Proposed Course of Action. The certificate administrator will be under no obligation to answer questions from Certificateholders regarding such Proposed Course of Action. For the avoidance of doubt, the certificate administrator’s obligations in connection with this heading “—Resolution of a
508
Repurchase Request” will be limited solely to tabulating Certificateholder responses of “agree” or “disagree” to the Proposed Course of Action, and such obligation will not be construed to impose any enforcement obligation on the certificate administrator. The Enforcing Servicer may conclusively rely (without investigation) on the certificate administrator’s tabulation of the responses of the responding Certificateholders. If (a) the Enforcing Servicer’s intended course of action with respect to the Repurchase Request does not involve pursuing further action to exercise rights against the related mortgage loan seller with respect to the Repurchase Request and the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner wishes to exercise its right to refer the matter to mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration, as discussed below under “—Mediation and Arbitration Provisions”, or (b) the Enforcing Servicer’s intended course of action is to pursue further action to exercise rights against the related mortgage loan seller with respect to the Repurchase Request but the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner does not agree with the dispute resolution method selected by the Enforcing Servicer, then the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or such other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner may deliver to the Enforcing Servicer a written notice (a “Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice”) within 30 days from the date the Proposed Course of Action Notice is posted on the certificate administrator’s website (the “Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date”) indicating its intent to exercise its right to refer the matter to either mediation or arbitration. In the event that (a) the Enforcing Servicer’s initial Proposed Course of Action indicated a recommendation to undertake mediation or arbitration, (b) any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner delivers a Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice and (c) the Enforcing Servicer also received responses from other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners supporting the Enforcing Servicer’s initial Proposed Course of Action, such additional responses from other Certificateholders or Certificate Owners will also be considered Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notices supporting such Proposed Course of Action for purposes of determining the course of action that involves referring the matter to mediation or arbitration, as the case may be, that is approved by the majority of Certificateholders.
If neither the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, nor any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner entitled to do so delivers a Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice prior to the Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date, no Certificateholder or Certificate Owner otherwise entitled to do so will have the right to refer the Repurchase Request to mediation or arbitration, and the Enforcing Servicer, as the Enforcing Party, will be the sole party entitled to determine a course of action, including, but not limited to, enforcing the issuing entity’s rights against the related mortgage loan seller, subject to any consent or consultation rights of the Directing Certificateholder.
Promptly and in any event within 10 business days following receipt of a Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice from (i) the Initial Requesting Certificateholder, if any, or (ii) any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner (each of clauses (i) and (ii), a “Requesting Certificateholder”), the Enforcing Servicer will be required to consult with each Requesting Certificateholder regarding such Requesting Certificateholder’s intention to elect either mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration as the dispute resolution method with respect to the Repurchase Request (the “Dispute Resolution Consultation”) so that such Requesting Certificateholder may consider the views of the Enforcing Servicer as to the claims underlying the Repurchase Request and possible dispute resolution methods, such discussions to occur and be completed no later than 10 business days following the Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date. The Enforcing Servicer will be entitled to establish procedures the Enforcing Servicer deems in good faith to be in accordance with the Servicing Standard relating to the timing and extent of such consultations. No later than 5
509
business days after completion of the Dispute Resolution Consultation, a Requesting Certificateholder may provide a final notice to the Enforcing Servicer indicating its decision to exercise its right to refer the matter to either mediation or arbitration (“Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice”).
If, following the Dispute Resolution Consultation, no Requesting Certificateholder timely delivers a Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice to the Enforcing Servicer, then the Enforcing Servicer will continue to act as the Enforcing Party and remain obligated under the PSA to determine a course of action, including, but not limited to, enforcing the rights of the issuing entity with respect to the Repurchase Request and no Certificateholder or Certificate Owner will have any further right to elect to refer the matter to mediation or arbitration.
If a Requesting Certificateholder timely delivers a Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice to the Enforcing Servicer, then such Requesting Certificateholder will become the Enforcing Party and must promptly submit the matter to mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration. If there are more than one Requesting Certificateholder that timely deliver a Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice, then such Requesting Certificateholders will collectively become the Enforcing Party, and the holder or holders of a majority of the Voting Rights among such Requesting Certificateholders will be entitled to make all decisions relating to such mediation or arbitration. If, however, no Requesting Certificateholder commences arbitration or mediation pursuant to the terms of the PSA within 30 days after delivery of its Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice to the Enforcing Servicer, then (i) the rights of a Requesting Certificateholder to act as the Enforcing Party will terminate and no Certificateholder or Certificate Owner will have any further right to elect to refer the matter to mediation or arbitration, (ii) if the Proposed Course of Action Notice indicated that the Enforcing Servicer will take no further action with respect to the Repurchase Request, then the related Material Defect will be deemed waived for all purposes under the PSA and related MLPA; provided, however, that such Material Defect will not be deemed waived with respect to a Requesting Certificateholder, any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner or the Enforcing Servicer to the extent there is a material change in the facts and circumstances known to such party at the time when the Proposed Course of Action Notice was posted on the certificate administrator’s website and (iii) if the Proposed Course of Action Notice had indicated a course of action other than the course of action under clause (ii), then the Enforcing Servicer will again become the Enforcing Party and, as such, will be the sole party entitled to enforce the issuing entity’s rights against the related mortgage loan seller.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the dispute resolution provisions described under this heading “—Resolution of a Repurchase Request” will not apply, and the Enforcing Servicer will remain the Enforcing Party, if the Enforcing Servicer has commenced litigation with respect to the Repurchase Request, or determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that it is in the best interest of Certificateholders to commence litigation with respect to the Repurchase Request to avoid the running of any applicable statute of limitations.
In the event a Requesting Certificateholder becomes the Enforcing Party, the Enforcing Servicer, on behalf of the issuing entity, will remain a party to any proceedings against the related mortgage loan seller as further described below. For the avoidance of doubt, the depositor, any mortgage loan seller with respect to the subject mortgage loan and any of their respective affiliates will not be entitled to be an Initial Requesting Certificateholder or a Requesting Certificateholder, to act as a Certificateholder for purposes of delivering any Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice or Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice or otherwise to vote Certificates owned by it or such affiliate(s) with respect to a course of
510
action proposed or undertaken pursuant to the procedures described under this “—Dispute Resolution Provisions” heading.
The Requesting Certificateholder is entitled to elect either mediation or arbitration in its sole discretion; however, the Requesting Certificateholder may not elect to then utilize the alternative method in the event that the initial method is unsuccessful.
Mediation and Arbitration Provisions
If the Enforcing Party elects mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration, the mediation or arbitration will be administered by a nationally recognized arbitration or mediation organization selected by the related mortgage loan seller. A single mediator or arbitrator will be selected by the mediation or arbitration organization from a list of neutrals maintained by it according to its mediation or arbitration rules then in effect. The mediator or arbitrator must be impartial, an attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York and have at least 15 years of experience in commercial litigation and, if possible, commercial real estate finance or commercial mortgage-backed securitization matters.
The expenses of any mediation will be allocated among the parties to the mediation, including, if applicable, between the Enforcing Party and Enforcing Servicer, as mutually agreed by the parties as part of the mediation.
In any arbitration, the arbitrator will be required to resolve the dispute in accordance with the MLPA and PSA, and may not modify or change those agreements in any way or award remedies not consistent with those agreements. The arbitrator will not have the power to award punitive or consequential damages. In its final determination, the arbitrator will determine and award the costs of the arbitration to the parties to the arbitration in its reasonable discretion. In the event a Requesting Certificateholder is the Enforcing Party, the Requesting Certificateholder will be required to pay any expenses allocated to the Enforcing Party in the arbitration proceedings or any expenses that the Enforcing Party agrees to bear in the mediation proceedings.
The final determination of the arbitrator will be final and non-appealable, except for actions to confirm or vacate the determination permitted under federal or state law, and may be entered and enforced in any court with jurisdiction over the parties and the matter. By selecting arbitration, the Enforcing Party would be waiving its right to sue in court, including the right to a trial by jury.
In the event a Requesting Certificateholder is the Enforcing Party, the agreement with the arbitrator or mediator, as the case may be, will be required under the PSA to contain an acknowledgment that the issuing entity, or the Enforcing Servicer on its behalf, will be a party to any arbitration or mediation proceedings solely for the purpose of being the beneficiary of any award in favor of the Enforcing Party; provided that the degree and extent to which the Enforcing Servicer actively prepares for and participates in such proceeding will be determined by such Enforcing Servicer in consultation with the Directing Certificateholder (provided that no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing), and in accordance with the Servicing Standard. All amounts recovered by the Enforcing Party will be required to be paid to the issuing entity, or the Enforcing Servicer on its behalf, and deposited in the Collection Account. The agreement with the arbitrator or mediator, as the case may be, will provide that in the event a Requesting Certificateholder is allocated any related costs and expenses pursuant to the terms of the arbitrator’s decision or the agreement reached in mediation, neither the issuing entity nor the Enforcing Servicer acting on its behalf will be responsible for any such costs and expenses allocated to the Requesting Certificateholder.
511
The issuing entity (or the Enforcing Servicer or the trustee, acting on its behalf), the depositor or any mortgage loan seller will be permitted to redact any personally identifiable customer information included in any information provided for purposes of any mediation or arbitration. Each party to the proceedings will be required to agree to keep confidential the details related to the Repurchase Request and the dispute resolution identified in connection with such proceedings; provided, however, that the Certificateholders will be permitted to communicate prior to the commencement of any such proceedings to the extent described under “Description of the Certificates—Certificateholder Communication”.
For avoidance of doubt, in no event will the exercise of any right of a Requesting Certificateholder to refer a Repurchase Request to mediation or arbitration or participation in such mediation or arbitration affect in any manner the ability of the master servicer or the special servicer to perform its obligations with respect to a Mortgage Loan (including without limitation, a liquidation, foreclosure, negotiation of a loan modification or workout, acceptance of a discounted pay off or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or bankruptcy or other litigation) or the exercise of any rights of a Directing Certificateholder.
Any out-of-pocket expenses required to be borne by or allocated to the Enforcing Servicer in mediation or arbitration or related responsibilities under the PSA will be reimbursable as additional trust fund expenses.
Servicing of the Non-Serviced Mortgage Loans
The master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator and the trustee under the PSA have no obligation or authority to (a) supervise any related Non-Serviced Master Servicer, Non-Serviced Special Servicer, Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator or Non-Serviced Trustee or (b) make servicing advances with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan. The obligation of the master servicer to provide information and collections and make P&I Advances to the certificate administrator for the benefit of the Certificateholders with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is dependent on its receipt of the corresponding information and/or collections from the applicable Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer.
General
Each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be serviced pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA and the related Intercreditor Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “—The Non-Serviced AB Whole Loans”.
The servicing terms of each such Non-Serviced PSA as it relates to the servicing of the related Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans will or are expected to be similar in all material respects to the servicing terms of the PSA applicable to the Serviced Mortgage Loans; however, the servicing arrangements under such agreements will differ in certain respects. For example:
● | Each Non-Serviced Master Servicer and Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be required to service the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan pursuant to a servicing standard set forth in the related Non-Serviced PSA that is substantially similar to, but may not be identical to, the Servicing Standard. |
● | Any party to the related Non-Serviced PSA that makes a property protection advance with respect to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be entitled to reimbursement for that advance, with interest at the prime rate, in a manner |
512
substantially similar to the reimbursement of Servicing Advances under the PSA. The Trust, as holder of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, will be responsible for its pro rata share of any such advance reimbursement amounts (including out of general collections on the UBS 2018-C8 mortgage pool, if necessary). |
● | Pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA, the liquidation fee, the special servicing fee and the workout fee with respect to the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan are similar to the corresponding fees payable under the PSA, except that caps, floors and offsets may differ or not apply. |
● | The extent to which modification fees or other fee items with respect to the related Whole Loan may be applied to offset interest on advances, servicer expenses and servicing compensation may, in certain circumstances, be less than is the case under the PSA. |
● | Items with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan that are the equivalent of assumption application fees, defeasance fees, assumption, waiver, consent and earnout fees, late payment charges, default interest and/or modification fees and that constitute additional servicing compensation under the related Non-Serviced PSA will not be payable to the master servicer or special servicer under the PSA and one or more of such items will be allocated between the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA in proportions that may be different than the allocation of similar fees under the PSA between the master servicer and special servicer for this transaction. |
● | The Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder under the related Non-Serviced PSA will have or is expected to have rights substantially similar to the Directing Certificateholder under the PSA with respect to the servicing and administration of the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan, including consenting to the substantial equivalent of Major Decisions under such Non-Serviced PSA proposed by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer or Non-Serviced Master Servicer, as applicable, and reviewing and consenting to asset status reports prepared by such Non-Serviced Special Servicer in respect of the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan. However, “Major Decisions” under the related Non-Serviced PSA may differ in certain respects from those actions that constitute Major Decisions under the PSA, and therefore the specific types of servicer actions with respect to which the applicable Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder will be permitted to consent may correspondingly differ. The related Non-Serviced PSA also provides or is expected to provide for the removal of the applicable Non-Serviced Special Servicer by the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder under such Non-Serviced PSA under certain conditions that are similar to the conditions under which the Directing Certificateholder is permitted to replace the special servicer under the PSA. |
● | The termination events that will result in the termination of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer are or are expected to be substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, the Servicer Termination Events under the PSA applicable to the master servicer and special servicer, as applicable. |
● | Servicing transfer events under the related Non-Serviced PSA that would cause the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan to become specially serviced will be or are |
513
expected to be substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, the corresponding provisions under the PSA. |
● | The servicing decisions which the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer will perform, and in certain cases for which the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer must obtain the related Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder’s or Non-Serviced Special Servicer’s consent, may differ in certain respects from those decisions that constitute Master Servicer Major Decisions under the PSA. |
● | The related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be required to take actions with respect to the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan if it becomes the equivalent of a defaulted mortgage loan, which actions are or are expected to be substantially similar, but not necessarily identical, to the actions described under “—Sale of Defaulted Loans and REO Properties”. |
● | Appraisal reduction amounts in respect of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan will be calculated by the related Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA in a manner substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, calculations of such amounts by the special servicer under the PSA in respect of Serviced Mortgage Loans. |
● | The requirement of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer to make compensating interest payments in respect of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is similar, but not necessarily identical, to the requirement of the master servicer to make Compensating Interest Payments in respect of the Serviced Mortgage Loans under the PSA (although the portion of the servicing fee to be applied to make such payments may be less). |
● | The servicing provisions under the related Non-Serviced PSA relating to performing inspections and collecting operating information are or are expected to be substantially similar, but not necessarily identical, to those of the PSA. |
● | While the special servicer under the PSA and the Non-Serviced Special Servicer under the related Non-Serviced PSA must each resign as special servicer with respect to a mortgage loan if it obtains knowledge that it has become affiliated with the related borrower under such mortgage loan, the particular types of affiliations that trigger such resignation obligation, as well as the parties that are entitled to appoint a successor special servicer, may differ as between the PSA and the related Non-Serviced PSA. |
● | The parties to the related Non-Serviced PSA (and their related directors, officers and other agents) will be entitled to reimbursement and/or indemnification for losses, liabilities, costs and expenses associated with the servicing of the related Non-Serviced Whole Loan under such Non-Serviced PSA to the same extent that parties to the PSA performing similar functions (and their related directors, officers and other agents) are entitled to reimbursement and/or indemnification for losses, liabilities, costs and expenses associated with their obligations under the PSA. The Trust, as holder of the related Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan, will be responsible for its pro rata share of any such indemnification amounts (including out of general collections on the UBS 2018-C8 mortgage pool, if necessary). |
● | The matters as to which notice or rating agency confirmation with respect to the rating agencies under the related Non-Serviced PSA are required are or are expected to be similar, but not necessarily identical to, similar matters with respect |
514
to the Rating Agencies under the PSA (and such agreements may differ as to whether it is notice or rating agency confirmation that is required and whether a notice to, or a confirmation from, the rating agencies under the related Non-Serviced PSA in connection with an action involving the subject Non-Serviced Whole Loan would also be required to be made to or obtained from the Rating Agencies under the PSA). |
● | With respect to non-specially serviced mortgage loans, the related Non-Serviced PSA may differ with respect to whether the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer or related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be responsible for conducting or managing certain litigation related to such mortgage loans. |
● | Each of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will be liable in accordance with the related Non-Serviced PSA only to the extent of its obligations specifically imposed by that agreement. Accordingly, in general, each of the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer and related Non-Serviced Special Servicer will not be liable for any action taken, or for refraining from the taking of any action, in good faith pursuant to the related Non-Serviced PSA or for errors in judgment; provided that neither such party will be protected against any breach of representations or warranties made by it in the related Non-Serviced PSA or against any liability which would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence in the performance of duties or by reason of negligent disregard of obligations and duties under the related Non-Serviced PSA. |
● | With respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan as to which the related securitization involves the issuance of “eligible vertical interests” (as defined in the Credit Risk Retention Rules), the related Non-Serviced PSA may provide for one or more “risk retention consultation parties” with certain consultation rights. |
● | The provisions of the related Non-Serviced PSA may also vary from the PSA with respect to one or more of the following: timing, control or consultation triggers or thresholds, terminology, allocation of ministerial duties between multiple servicers or other service providers or certificateholder or investor voting or consent thresholds, master servicer and special servicer termination events, rating requirements for accounts and permitted investments, eligibility requirements applicable to servicers and other service providers, and the circumstances under which approvals, consents, consultation, notices or rating agency confirmations may be required. |
The master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator and the trustee under the PSA have no obligation or authority to (a) supervise any related Non-Serviced Master Servicer, Non-Serviced Special Servicer, Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator or Non-Serviced Trustee or (b) make servicing advances with respect to any Non-Serviced Whole Loan. The obligation of the master servicer to provide information and collections and make P&I Advances to the certificate administrator for the benefit of the Certificateholders with respect to each Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan is dependent on its receipt of the corresponding information and/or collections from the applicable Non-Serviced Master Servicer or Non-Serviced Special Servicer.
Prospective investors are encouraged to review the full provisions of each of the Non-Serviced PSAs, which are available online at www.sec.gov or by requesting copies from the underwriters.
515
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the servicing of a Servicing Shift Whole Loan is expected to be governed by the PSA only temporarily, until the securitization of the related controlling Pari Passu Companion Loan. Thereafter, such Servicing Shift Whole Loan will be serviced by the related master servicer and, if and to the extent necessary, the related special servicer under and pursuant to the terms of the related Servicing Shift PSA governing such future securitization. Although, in the case of each Servicing Shift Whole Loan, the related Intercreditor Agreement imposes some requirements regarding the terms of the related Servicing Shift PSA governing such future securitization, the securitization to which the related controlling Pari Passu Companion Loan is to be contributed has not been determined, and accordingly, the servicing terms of such future Servicing Shift PSA are unknown and may not be consistent with the description of Non-Serviced PSAs above.
Rating Agency Confirmations
The PSA will provide that, notwithstanding the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents or other provisions of the PSA, if any action under such Mortgage Loan documents or the PSA requires a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies as a condition precedent to such action, if the party (the “Requesting Party”) required to obtain such Rating Agency Confirmations has made a request to any Rating Agency for such Rating Agency Confirmation and, within 10 business days of such request being posted to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website, such Rating Agency has not replied to such request or has responded in a manner that indicates that such Rating Agency is neither reviewing such request nor waiving the requirement for Rating Agency Confirmation, then such Requesting Party will be required to confirm (through direct communication and not by posting any confirmation on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) that the applicable Rating Agency has received the Rating Agency Confirmation request, and, if it has not, promptly request the related Rating Agency Confirmation again. The circumstances described in the preceding sentence are referred to in this prospectus as a “RAC No-Response Scenario”.
If there is no response to either such Rating Agency Confirmation request within 5 business days of such second request in a RAC No-Response Scenario or if such Rating Agency has responded in a manner that indicates such Rating Agency is neither reviewing such request nor waiving the requirement for Rating Agency Confirmation, then (x) with respect to any condition in any Mortgage Loan document requiring such Rating Agency Confirmation, or with respect to any other matter under the PSA relating to the servicing of the Mortgage Loans (other than as set forth in clause (y) below), the requirement to obtain a Rating Agency Confirmation will be deemed not to apply (as if such requirement did not exist) with respect to such Rating Agency, and the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be, may then take such action if the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, confirms its original determination (made prior to making such request) that taking the action with respect to which it requested the Rating Agency Confirmation would still be consistent with the Servicing Standard, and (y) with respect to a replacement of the master servicer or special servicer, such condition will be deemed not to apply (as if such requirement did not exist) if (i) the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer has been appointed and currently serves as a master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, on a transaction-level basis on a transaction currently rated by Moody’s that currently has securities outstanding and for which Moody’s has not cited servicing concerns with respect to the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer as the sole or material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in a CMBS transaction serviced by the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer prior to the time of determination, if Moody’s is the non-responding Rating Agency, (ii) the
516
applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer is rated at least “CMS3” (in the case of the master servicer) or “CSS3” (in the case of the special servicer), if Fitch is the non-responding Rating Agency or (iii) KBRA has not publicly cited servicing concerns of the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer as the sole or a material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in any other commercial mortgage-backed securitization transaction serviced by such master servicer or special servicer prior to the time of determination, if KBRA is the non-responding Rating Agency. Promptly following the master servicer’s or special servicer’s determination to take any action discussed above following any requirement to obtain Rating Agency Confirmation being deemed not to apply (as if such requirement did not exist) as described in clause (x) above, the master servicer or special servicer will be required to provide electronic written notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will promptly post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website pursuant to the PSA, of the action taken.
For all other matters or actions not specifically discussed above, the applicable Requesting Party will be required to obtain a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies. In the event an action otherwise requires a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies, in absence of such Rating Agency Confirmation, we cannot assure you that any Rating Agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of any such action taken by the master servicer or the special servicer in accordance with the procedures discussed above.
As used above, “Rating Agency Confirmation” means, with respect to any matter, confirmation in writing (which may be in electronic form) by each applicable Rating Agency that a proposed action, failure to act or other event specified in this prospectus will not, in and of itself, result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current rating assigned to any class of certificates (if then rated by the Rating Agency); provided that a written waiver or acknowledgment from the Rating Agency indicating its decision not to review the matter for which the Rating Agency Confirmation is sought will be deemed to satisfy the requirement for the Rating Agency Confirmation from the Rating Agency with respect to such matter. The “Rating Agencies” mean Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc. (“KBRA”), Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”).
Any Rating Agency Confirmation requests made by the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, or the trustee, as applicable, pursuant to the PSA, will be required to be made in writing, which writing must contain a cover page indicating the nature of the Rating Agency Confirmation request, and must contain all back-up material necessary for the Rating Agency to process such request. Such written Rating Agency Confirmation requests must be provided in electronic format to the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will be required to post such request on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in accordance with the PSA).
The master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator and the trustee will be permitted (but not obligated) to orally communicate with the Rating Agencies regarding any of the Mortgage Loan documents or any matter related to the Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Properties, the related borrowers or any other matters relating to the PSA or any related Intercreditor Agreement; provided that such party summarizes the information provided to the Rating Agencies in such communication in writing and provides the 17g-5 Information Provider with such written summary the same day such communication takes place; provided, further, that the summary of such oral communications will not identify with which Rating Agency the communication was. The 17g-5 Information Provider will be required to post such written summary on the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in accordance with the provisions of the PSA. All other
517
information required to be delivered to the Rating Agencies pursuant to the PSA or requested by the Rating Agencies, will first be provided in electronic format to the 17g-5 Information Provider, who will be required to post such information to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website in accordance with the PSA.
The PSA will provide that the PSA may be amended to change the procedures regarding compliance with Rule 17g-5 without any Certificateholder consent; provided that notice of any such amendment must be provided to the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website) and to the certificate administrator (which will post such report to the certificate administrator’s website).
To the extent a rating agency confirmation is required under the PSA in connection with any servicing action involving a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Serviced Whole Loan, a rating agency confirmation will generally be required from the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of any such rating agency’s then-current ratings of any affected Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities, provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as described above with respect to any Rating Agency Confirmation from a Rating Agency.
Evidence as to Compliance
The master servicer, the special servicer (regardless of whether the special servicer has commenced special servicing of a Mortgage Loan), the custodian, the trustee (provided, however, that the trustee will not be required to deliver an assessment of compliance with respect to any period during which there was no relevant servicing criteria applicable to it) and the certificate administrator will be required to furnish (and each such party will be required, with respect to each servicing function participant with which it has entered into a servicing relationship with respect to the Mortgage Loans, to cause (or, in the case of a sub-servicer that is also a servicing function participant that a mortgage loan seller requires the master servicer to retain, to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) such servicing function participant to furnish), to the depositor, the certificate administrator, the trustee and the 17g-5 Information Provider, an officer’s certificate of the officer responsible for the servicing activities of such party stating, among other things, that (i) a review of that party’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion of that year and of performance under the PSA or any sub-servicing agreement in the case of an additional master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, has been made under such officer’s supervision and (ii) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on the review, such party has fulfilled all of its obligations under the PSA or the sub-servicing agreement in the case of an additional master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in all material respects throughout the preceding calendar year or portion of such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status of the failure.
In addition, the master servicer, the special servicer (regardless of whether the special servicer has commenced special servicing of any Mortgage Loan), the trustee (but only if an advance was made by the trustee in the calendar year), the custodian, the certificate administrator and the operating advisor, each at its own expense, will be required to furnish (and each such party will be required, with respect to each servicing function participant with which it has entered into a servicing relationship with respect to the Mortgage Loans, to cause (or, in the case of a sub-servicer that is also a servicing function participant that a mortgage loan seller requires the master servicer to retain, to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) such servicing function participant to furnish) to the trustee, the certificate administrator, the 17g-5 Information Provider and the depositor (and, with respect to the
518
special servicer, also to the operating advisor) a report (an “Assessment of Compliance”) assessing compliance by that party with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB (as described below) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) that contains the following:
● | a statement of the party’s responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 of Regulation AB applicable to it; |
● | a statement that the party used the criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria; |
● | the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during and as of the end of the fiscal year, covered by the Form 10-K required to be filed pursuant to the PSA setting forth any material instance of noncompliance identified by the party, a discussion of each such failure and the nature and status of such failure; and |
● | a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report (an “Attestation Report”) on the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during and as of the end of the prior fiscal year. |
Each party that is required to deliver an Assessment of Compliance will also be required to simultaneously deliver an Attestation Report of a registered public accounting firm, prepared in accordance with the standards for attestation engagements issued or adopted by the public company accounting oversight board, that expresses an opinion, or states that an opinion cannot be expressed (and the reasons for this), concerning the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.
With respect to each Non-Serviced Whole Loan, each of the Non-Serviced Master Servicer, the Non-Serviced Special Servicer, the Non-Serviced Trustee and the Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator will have obligations under the related Non-Serviced PSA similar to those described above.
“Regulation AB” means subpart 229.1100 – Asset Backed Securities (Regulation AB), 17 C.F.R. §§229.1100–229.1125, as such may be amended from time to time, and subject to such clarification and interpretation as have been provided by the SEC or by the staff of the SEC, or as may be provided by the SEC or its staff from time to time.
Limitation on Rights of Certificateholders to Institute a Proceeding
Other than with respect to any rights to deliver a Certificateholder Repurchase Request and exercise the rights described under “—Dispute Resolution Provisions”, no Certificateholder will have any right under the PSA to institute any proceeding with respect to the PSA, any Intercreditor Agreement, any Mortgage Loan or with respect to the certificates, unless the holder previously has given to the trustee and the certificate administrator written notice of default and the continuance of the default and unless (except in the case of a default by the trustee) the holders of certificates of any class evidencing not less than 25% of the aggregate Percentage Interests constituting the class have made written request upon the trustee to institute a proceeding in its own name (as trustee) and have offered to the trustee indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it, and the trustee for 60 days after receipt of the request and indemnity has neglected or refused to institute the proceeding. However, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the trusts or powers vested in it by the PSA or the certificates or to institute, conduct or defend any
519
related litigation at the request, order or direction of any of the Certificateholders, unless the Certificateholders have offered to the trustee reasonable security or indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities that may be incurred as a result.
Each Certificateholder will be deemed under the PSA to have expressly covenanted with every other Certificateholder and the trustee, that no one or more Certificateholders will have any right in any manner whatsoever by virtue of any provision of the PSA or the certificates to affect, disturb or prejudice the rights of the holders of any other certificates, or to obtain or seek to obtain priority over or preference to any other Certificateholder, or to enforce any right under the PSA or the certificates, except in the manner provided in the PSA or the certificates and for the equal, ratable and common benefit of all Certificateholders.
Termination; Retirement of Certificates
The obligations created by the PSA will terminate upon payment (or provision for payment) to all Certificateholders of all amounts held by the certificate administrator on behalf of the trustee and required to be paid on the Distribution Date following the earlier of (1) the final payment (or related Advance) or other liquidation of the last Mortgage Loan and REO Property (as applicable) subject to the PSA, (2) the voluntary exchange of all the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) for the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties remaining in the issuing entity (provided, however, that (A) the aggregate certificate balance of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class D certificates is reduced to zero, (B) there is only one holder (or multiple holders acting unanimously) of the then-outstanding certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates) and (C) the master servicer consents to the exchange) or (3) the purchase or other liquidation of all of the assets of the issuing entity as described below by the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates, in that order of priority. Written notice of termination of the PSA will be given by the certificate administrator to each Certificateholder, each holder of a Serviced Companion Loan and the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will promptly post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website). The final distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the certificates at the office of the certificate registrar or other location specified in the notice of termination.
The holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer and the holders of the Class R certificates (in that order) will have the right to purchase all of the assets of the issuing entity. This purchase of all the Mortgage Loans and other assets in the issuing entity is required to be made at a price equal to (a) the sum of (1) the aggregate Purchase Price of all the Mortgage Loans (exclusive of REO Loans) then included in the issuing entity, (2) the appraised value of the issuing entity’s portion of all REO Properties then included in the issuing entity (which fair market value for any REO Property may be less than the Purchase Price for the corresponding REO Loan), as determined by an appraiser selected by the special servicer and approved by the master servicer and the Controlling Class, (3) the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of the master servicer and the special servicer with respect to such termination, unless the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, is the purchaser of such Mortgage Loans and (4) if the Mortgaged Property secures a Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan and is an REO Property under the terms of the related Non-Serviced PSA, the pro rata portion of the fair market value of the related property, as determined by the related Non-Serviced Master Servicer in accordance with clause (2) above, less (b) solely in the case where the master servicer is exercising such purchase right, the aggregate amount of unreimbursed Advances, together with any interest
520
accrued and payable to the master servicer in respect of such Advances in accordance with the PSA and unpaid Servicing Fees remaining outstanding and payable solely to the master servicer (which items will be deemed to have been paid or reimbursed to the master servicer in connection with such purchase). This purchase will effect early retirement of the then-outstanding certificates, but the rights of the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates to effect the termination is subject to the requirements that the then aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the pool of Mortgage Loans be less than 1.0% of the Initial Pool Balance. The voluntary exchange of certificates (other than the Class Z and Class R certificates), for the remaining Mortgage Loans is not subject to the above described percentage limits but is limited to each such class of outstanding certificates being held by one Certificateholder (or group of Certificateholders acting unanimously) who must voluntarily participate.
On the applicable Distribution Date, the aggregate amount paid by the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates, as the case may be, for the Mortgage Loans and other applicable assets in the issuing entity, together with all other amounts on deposit in the Collection Account and not otherwise payable to a person other than the Certificateholders, will be applied generally as described above under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”.
Amendment
The PSA may be amended by the parties to the PSA, without the consent of any of the holders of certificates or holders of any Companion Loan:
(a) to correct any defect or ambiguity in the PSA in order to address any manifest error in any provision of the PSA;
(b) to cause the provisions in the PSA to conform or be consistent with or in furtherance of the statements made in the prospectus (or in an offering document for any related non-offered certificates) with respect to the certificates, the issuing entity or the PSA or to correct or supplement any of its provisions which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provisions in the PSA or to correct any error;
(c) to change the timing and/or nature of deposits in the Collection Account, the Distribution Accounts or any REO Account, provided that (A) the P&I Advance Date will in no event be later than the business day prior to the related Distribution Date and (B) the change would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder, as evidenced in writing by an opinion of counsel at the expense of the party requesting such amendment or as evidenced by a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies with respect to such amendment;
(d) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions to the extent as will be necessary to maintain the qualification of any Trust REMIC as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust under the relevant provisions of the Code at all times that any certificate is outstanding, or to avoid or minimize the risk of imposition of any tax on the issuing entity, any Trust REMIC or the Grantor Trust; provided that the trustee and the certificate administrator have received an opinion of counsel (at the expense of the party requesting the amendment) to the effect that (1) the action is necessary or desirable to maintain such qualification or to avoid or minimize the risk of imposition of any such tax and (2) the action will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any holder of the certificates or holder of a Companion Loan;
521
(e) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions to restrict (or to remove any existing restrictions with respect to) the transfer of the Residual Certificates; provided that the depositor has determined that the amendment will not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, give rise to any tax with respect to the transfer of the Residual Certificates to a non-permitted transferee;
(f) to revise or add any other provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the PSA or any other change, provided that the required action will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder or any holder of a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan not consenting to such revision or addition, as evidenced in writing by an opinion of counsel at the expense of the party requesting such amendment or as evidenced by a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies with respect to such amendment or supplement and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus);
(g) to amend or supplement any provision of the PSA to the extent necessary to maintain the then-current ratings assigned to each class of Offered Certificates by each Rating Agency, as evidenced by a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus); provided that such amendment or supplement would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder not consenting to such amendment or supplement, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel;
(h) to modify the provisions of the PSA with respect to reimbursement of Nonrecoverable Advances and Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts if (a) the depositor, the master servicer, the trustee and, with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than an Excluded Loan and for so long as no Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and with respect to the Mortgage Loans other than any Excluded Loan, the Directing Certificateholder, determine that the commercial mortgage-backed securities industry standard for such provisions has changed, in order to conform to such industry standard, (b) such modification does not adversely affect the status of any Trust REMIC as a REMIC or the status of the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust under the relevant provisions of the Code, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel and (c) a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus);
(i) to modify the procedures set forth in the PSA relating to compliance with Rule 17g-5, provided that the change would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder, as evidenced by (A) an opinion of counsel or (B) if any certificate is then rated, receipt of Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency rating such certificates; and provided, further, that the certificate administrator must give notice of any such amendment to the 17g-5 Information Provider for posting on the
522
17g-5 Information Provider’s website and the certificate administration must post such notice to its website;
(j) in the event the Credit Risk Retention Rules or any other regulations applicable to the risk retention requirements for this securitization transaction are amended or repealed, to the extent required to comply with any such amendment or to modify or eliminate the risk retention requirements in the event of such repeal; or
(k) to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions to such extent as will be necessary to comply with the requirements for use of Form SF-3 in registered offerings to the extent provided in CFR 239.45(b)(1)(ii), (iii) or (iv).
The PSA may also be amended by the parties to the PSA with the consent of the holders of certificates of each class affected by such amendment evidencing, in each case, a majority of the aggregate Percentage Interests constituting the class for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the PSA or of modifying in any manner the rights of the holders of the certificates, except that the amendment may not directly (1) reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of, payments received on the Mortgage Loans or Whole Loans that are required to be distributed on a certificate of any class without the consent of the holder of such certificate or which are required to be distributed to a holder of a Companion Loan without the consent of such holder, (2) reduce the aforesaid percentage of certificates of any class the holders of which are required to consent to the amendment or remove the requirement to obtain consent of any holder of a Companion Loan, without the consent of the holders of all certificates of that class then-outstanding or such holder of the related Companion Loan, (3) adversely affect the Voting Rights of any class of certificates, without the consent of the holders of all certificates of that class then-outstanding, (4) change in any manner any defined term used in any MLPA or the obligations or rights of any mortgage loan seller under any MLPA or change any rights of any mortgage loan seller as third party beneficiary under the PSA without the consent of the related mortgage loan seller, or (5) amend the Servicing Standard without the consent of 100% of the holders of certificates or a Rating Agency Confirmation by each Rating Agency and confirmation of the applicable rating agencies that such action will not result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of its then-current ratings of any securities related to a Companion Loan, if any (provided that such rating agency confirmation may be considered satisfied in the same manner as any Rating Agency Confirmation may be considered satisfied with respect to the certificates as described in this prospectus).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment to the PSA may be made that changes in any manner the obligations or rights of any mortgage loan seller under any MLPA or the rights of any mortgage loan seller, including as a third party beneficiary, under the PSA, without the consent of such mortgage loan seller. In addition, no amendment to the PSA may be made that changes any provisions specifically required to be included in the PSA by the related Intercreditor Agreement or that otherwise materially and adversely affects the holder of a Companion Loan without the consent of the holder of the related Companion Loan.
Also, notwithstanding the foregoing, no party to the PSA will be permitted to consent to any amendment to the PSA without the trustee, the certificate administrator, the master servicer, the special servicer, the asset representations reviewer and the operating advisor having first received an opinion of counsel (at the issuing entity’s expense) to the effect that the amendment is permitted under the PSA, and that the amendment or the exercise of any power granted to the master servicer, the special servicer, the depositor, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer or any
523
other specified person in accordance with the amendment will not result in the imposition of a tax on any portion of the issuing entity or cause any Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or cause the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust under the relevant provisions of the Code.
Resignation and Removal of the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator
Each of the trustee and the certificate administrator will at all times be, and will be required to resign if it fails to be, (i) a corporation, national bank, national banking association or a trust company, organized and doing business under the laws of any state or the United States of America, authorized under such laws to exercise corporate trust powers and to accept the trust conferred under the PSA, having a combined capital and surplus of at least $100,000,000 and subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authority and, in the case of the trustee, will not be an affiliate of the master servicer or special servicer (except during any period when the trustee is acting as, or has become successor to, the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be), (ii) an institution insured by the FDIC, (iii) an institution whose long-term senior unsecured debt is rated at least “A2” by Moody’s, “A-” by Fitch and, if rated by KBRA, “A” by KBRA; provided that the trustee will not become ineligible to serve based on a failure to satisfy such rating requirements as long as (a) it maintains a long-term unsecured debt rating of no less than “Baa2” by Moody’s and “A-” by Fitch, (b) its short-term debt obligations have a short-term rating of not less than “P-2” from Moody’s and “F1” by Fitch and (c) the master servicer maintains a rating of at least “A2” by Moody’s and “A+” by Fitch, or such other rating with respect to which the Rating Agencies have provided a Rating Agency Confirmation, and (iv) an entity that is not a prohibited party under the PSA.
The trustee and the certificate administrator will be also permitted at any time to resign from their obligations and duties under the PSA by giving written notice (which notice will be posted to the certificate administrator’s website pursuant to the PSA) to the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable, all Certificateholders, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer and the 17g-5 Information Provider (who will promptly post such notice to the 17g-5 Information Provider’s website). Upon receiving this notice of resignation, the depositor will be required to use its reasonable best efforts to promptly appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator acceptable to the master servicer and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Directing Certificateholder. If no successor trustee or certificate administrator has accepted an appointment within 90 days after the giving of notice of resignation, the resigning trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, may petition any court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and such petition will be an expense of the issuing entity.
If at any time the trustee or certificate administrator ceases to be eligible to continue as trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, under the PSA, and fails to resign after written request therefor by the depositor or the master servicer, or if at any time the trustee or certificate administrator becomes incapable of acting, or if certain events of, or proceedings in respect of, bankruptcy or insolvency occur with respect to the trustee or certificate administrator, or if the trustee or certificate administrator fails to timely publish any report to be delivered, published, or otherwise made available by the certificate administrator pursuant to the PSA, and such failure continues unremedied for a period of 5 days, or if the certificate administrator fails to make distributions required pursuant to the PSA, the depositor will be authorized to remove the trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator acceptable to the
524
master servicer. If no successor trustee or certificate administrator has accepted an appointment within 90 days after the giving of notice of removal, the removed trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, may petition any court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and such petition will be an expense of the issuing entity.
In addition, holders of the certificates entitled to at least 75% of the Voting Rights may upon 30 days prior written notice, with or without cause, remove the trustee or certificate administrator under the PSA and appoint a successor trustee or certificate administrator. In the event that holders of the certificates entitled to at least 75% of the Voting Rights elect to remove the trustee or certificate administrator without cause and appoint a successor, the successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, will be responsible for all expenses necessary to effect the transfer of responsibilities from its predecessor.
Any resignation or removal of the trustee or certificate administrator and appointment of a successor trustee or certificate administrator will not become effective until (i) acceptance of appointment by the successor trustee or certificate administrator, as applicable, and (ii) the certificate administrator files any required Form 8-K. Further, the resigning trustee or certificate administrator, as the case may be, must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties.
The PSA will prohibit the appointment of the asset representations reviewer or one of its affiliates as successor to the trustee or certificate administrator.
Governing Law; Waiver of Jury Trial; and Consent to Jurisdiction
The PSA will be governed by the laws of the State of New York. Each party to the PSA will waive its respective right to a jury trial for any claim or cause of action based upon or arising out of or related to the PSA or certificates. Additionally, each party to the PSA will consent to the jurisdiction of any New York State and Federal courts sitting in New York City with respect to matters arising out of or related to the PSA.
Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans
The following discussion contains general summaries of certain legal aspects of mortgage loans secured by commercial and multifamily residential properties. Because such legal aspects are governed by applicable local law (which laws may differ substantially), the summaries do not purport to be complete, to reflect the laws of any particular jurisdiction, or to encompass the laws of all jurisdictions in which the security for the mortgage loans is situated.
California
Mortgage loans in California are generally secured by deeds of trust on the related real estate. Foreclosure of a deed of trust in California may be accomplished by a non-judicial trustee’s sale (so long as it is permitted under a specific provision in the deed of trust) or by judicial foreclosure, in each case subject to and accordance with the applicable procedures and requirements of California law. Public notice of either the trustee’s sale or the judgment of foreclosure is given for a statutory period of time after which the mortgaged real estate may be sold by the trustee, if foreclosed pursuant to the trustee’s power of sale, or by court appointed sheriff under a judicial foreclosure. Following a judicial foreclosure sale, the borrower or its successor-in-interest may, for a period of up to one year, redeem the property; however, there is no redemption following a trustee’s power of sale. California’s “security first” and “one action” rules require the lender to complete foreclosure of all real
525
estate provided as security under the deed of trust in a single action in an attempt to satisfy the full debt before bringing a personal action (if otherwise permitted) against the borrower for recovery of the debt, except in certain cases involving environmentally impaired real property where foreclosure of the real property is not required before making a claim under the indemnity. This restriction may apply to property which is not located in California if a single promissory note is secured by property located in California and other jurisdictions. California case law has held that acts such as (but not limited to) an offset of an unpledged account constitute violations of such statutes. Violations of such statutes may result in the loss of some or all of the security under the mortgage loan and a loss of the ability to sue for the debt. A sale by the trustee under the deed of trust does not constitute an “action” for purposes of the “one action rule”. Other statutory provisions in California limit any deficiency judgment (if otherwise permitted) against the borrower following a judicial foreclosure to the amount by which the indebtedness exceeds the fair value at the time of the public sale and in no event greater than the difference between the foreclosure sale price and the amount of the indebtedness. Further, under California law, once a property has been sold pursuant to a power of sale clause contained in a deed of trust (and in the case of certain types of purchase money acquisition financings, under all circumstances), the lender is precluded from seeking a deficiency judgment from the borrower or, under certain circumstances, guarantors.
On the other hand, under certain circumstances, California law permits separate and even contemporaneous actions against both the borrower (as to the enforcement of the interests in the collateral securing the loan) and any guarantors. California statutory provisions regarding assignments of rents and leases require that a lender whose loan is secured by such an assignment must exercise a remedy with respect to rents as authorized by statute in order to establish its right to receive the rents after an event of default. Among the remedies authorized by statute is the lender’s right to have a receiver appointed under certain circumstances.
Texas
Commercial mortgage loans in Texas are generally secured by deeds of trust on the related real estate. Foreclosure of a deed of trust in Texas may be accomplished by either a non-judicial trustee’s sale under a specific power-of-sale provision set forth in the deed of trust or by judicial foreclosure. Due to the relatively short period of time involved in a non-judicial foreclosure, the judicial foreclosure process is rarely used in Texas. A judicial foreclosure action must be initiated, and a non-judicial foreclosure must be completed, within four years from the date the cause of action accrues. The cause of action for the unpaid balance of the indebtedness accrues upon the maturity of the indebtedness (by acceleration or otherwise).
Unless expressly waived in the deed of trust, the lender must provide the debtor with a written demand for payment, a notice of intent to accelerate the indebtedness, and a notice of acceleration prior to commencing any foreclosure action. It is customary practice in Texas for the demand for payment to be combined with the notice of intent to accelerate the indebtedness. In addition, with respect to a non-judicial foreclosure sale and notwithstanding any waiver by debtor to the contrary, the lender is statutorily required to (i) provide each debtor obligated to pay the indebtedness a notice of foreclosure sale via certified mail, postage prepaid and addressed to each debtor at such debtor’s last known address at least 21 days before the date of the foreclosure sale; (ii) post a notice of foreclosure sale at the courthouse of each county in which the property is located; and (iii) file a notice of foreclosure sale with the county clerk of each county in which the property is located. Such 21 day period includes the entire calendar day on which the notice is deposited with the United States mail and excludes the entire calendar day of the
526
foreclosure sale. The statutory foreclosure notice may be combined with the notice of acceleration of the indebtedness and must contain the location of the foreclosure sale and a statement of the earliest time at which the foreclosure sale will begin. To the extent the note or deed of trust contains additional notice requirements, the lender must comply with such requirements in addition to the statutory requirements set forth above.
The trustee’s sale must be performed pursuant to the terms of the deed of trust and statutory law and must take place between the hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the first Tuesday of the month, in the area designated for such sales by the county commissioners’ court of the county in which the property is located, and must begin at the time set forth in the notice of foreclosure sale or not later than three hours after that time. If the property is located in multiple counties, the sale may occur in any county in which a portion of the property is located. Under Texas law applicable to the subject property, the debtor does not have the right to redeem the property after foreclosure. Any action for deficiency must be brought within two years of the foreclosure sale. If the foreclosure sale price is less than the fair market value of the property, the debtor or any obligor (including any guarantor) may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency in the amount by which the fair market value of the property, less the amount of any claim, indebtedness, or obligation of any kind that is secured by a lien or encumbrance on the real property that was not extinguished by the foreclosure, exceeds the foreclosure sale price.
General
Each mortgage loan will be evidenced by a promissory note and secured by an instrument granting a security interest in real property, which may be a mortgage, deed of trust or a deed to secure debt, depending upon the prevailing practice and law in the state in which the related mortgaged property is located. Mortgages, deeds of trust and deeds to secure debt are in this prospectus collectively referred to as “mortgages”. A mortgage creates a lien upon, or grants a title interest in, the real property covered thereby, and represents the security for the repayment of the indebtedness customarily evidenced by a promissory note. The priority of the lien created or interest granted will depend on the terms of the mortgage and, in some cases, on the terms of separate subordination agreements or intercreditor agreements with others that hold interests in the real property, the knowledge of the parties to the mortgage and, generally, the order of recordation of the mortgage in the appropriate public recording office. However, the lien of a recorded mortgage will generally be subordinate to later-arising liens for real estate taxes and assessments and other charges imposed under governmental police powers.
Types of Mortgage Instruments
There are two parties to a mortgage: a mortgagor (the borrower and usually the owner of the applicable property) and a mortgagee (the lender). In contrast, a deed of trust is a three-party instrument, among a trustor (the equivalent of a borrower), a trustee to whom the real property is conveyed, and a beneficiary (the lender) for whose benefit the conveyance is made. Under a deed of trust, the trustor grants the property, irrevocably until the debt is paid, in trust and generally with a power of sale, to the trustee to secure repayment of the indebtedness evidenced by the related note. A deed to secure debt typically has two parties, pursuant to which the borrower, or grantor, conveys title to the real property to the grantee, or lender generally with a power of sale, until such time as the debt is repaid. In a case where the borrower is a land trust, there would be an additional party because legal title to the property is held by a land trustee under a land trust agreement for the benefit of the borrower. At origination of a mortgage loan involving a land trust, the borrower may execute a separate undertaking to make payments on the
527
promissory note. The land trustee would not be personally liable for the promissory note obligation. The mortgagee’s authority under a mortgage, the trustee’s authority under a deed of trust and the grantee’s authority under a deed to secure debt are governed by the express provisions of the related instrument, the law of the state in which the real property is located, certain federal laws and, in some deed of trust transactions, the directions of the beneficiary.
Leases and Rents
Mortgages that encumber income-producing property often contain an assignment of rents and leases, and/or may be accompanied by a separate assignment of rents and leases, pursuant to which the borrower assigns to the lender the borrower’s right, title and interest as landlord under each lease and the income derived from the lease, while (unless rents are to be paid directly to the lender) retaining a revocable license to collect the rents for so long as there is no default. If the borrower defaults, the license terminates and the lender is entitled to collect the rents. Local law may require that the lender take possession of the property and/or obtain a court-appointed receiver before becoming entitled to collect the rents.
In most states, hotel property and motel room rates are considered accounts receivable under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). In cases where hotel properties or motels constitute loan security, the revenues are generally pledged by the borrower as additional security for the loan. In general, the lender must file financing statements in order to perfect its security interest in the room revenues and must file continuation statements, generally every 5 years, to maintain perfection of such security interest. In certain cases, mortgage loans secured by hotel properties or motels may be included in the issuing entity even if the security interest in the room revenues was not perfected. Even if the lender’s security interest in room revenues is perfected under applicable nonbankruptcy law, it will generally be required to commence a foreclosure action or otherwise take possession of the property in order to enforce its rights to collect the room revenues following a default. In the bankruptcy setting, however, the lender will be stayed from enforcing its rights to collect room revenues, but those room revenues constitute “cash collateral” and therefore generally cannot be used by the bankruptcy debtor without a hearing or lender’s consent or unless the lender’s interest in the room revenues is given adequate protection (e.g., cash payment for otherwise encumbered funds or a replacement lien on unencumbered property, in either case in value equivalent to the amount of room revenues that the debtor proposes to use, or other similar relief). See “—Bankruptcy Laws” below.
Personalty
In the case of certain types of mortgaged properties, such as hotel properties, motels, nursing homes and manufactured housing, personal property (to the extent owned by the borrower and not previously pledged) may constitute a significant portion of the property’s value as security. The creation and enforcement of liens on personal property are governed by the UCC. Accordingly, if a borrower pledges personal property as security for a mortgage loan, the lender generally must file UCC financing statements in order to perfect its security interest in that personal property, and must file continuation statements, generally every five years, to maintain that perfection. Certain mortgage loans secured in part by personal property may be included in the issuing entity even if the security interest in such personal property was not perfected.
528
Foreclosure
General
Foreclosure is a legal procedure that allows the lender to recover its mortgage debt by enforcing its rights and available legal remedies under the mortgage. If the borrower defaults in payment or performance of its obligations under the promissory note or mortgage, the lender has the right to institute foreclosure proceedings to sell the real property at public auction to satisfy the indebtedness.
Foreclosure Procedures Vary from State to State
Two primary methods of foreclosing a mortgage are judicial foreclosure, involving court proceedings, and nonjudicial foreclosure pursuant to a power of sale granted in the mortgage instrument. Other foreclosure procedures are available in some states, but they are either infrequently used or available only in limited circumstances.
A foreclosure action is subject to most of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if defenses are raised or counterclaims are interposed, and sometimes requires several years to complete.
See also “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Risks Associated with One Action Rules”.
Judicial Foreclosure
A judicial foreclosure proceeding is conducted in a court having jurisdiction over the mortgaged property. Generally, the action is initiated by the service of legal pleadings upon all parties having a subordinate interest of record in the real property and all parties in possession of the property, under leases or otherwise, whose interests are subordinate to the mortgage. Delays in completion of the foreclosure may occasionally result from difficulties in locating defendants. When the lender’s right to foreclose is contested, the legal proceedings can be time-consuming. Upon successful completion of a judicial foreclosure proceeding, the court generally issues a judgment of foreclosure and appoints a referee or other officer to conduct a public sale of the mortgaged property, the proceeds of which are used to satisfy the judgment. Such sales are made in accordance with procedures that vary from state to state.
Equitable and Other Limitations on Enforceability of Certain Provisions
United States courts have traditionally imposed general equitable principles to limit the remedies available to lenders in foreclosure actions. These principles are generally designed to relieve borrowers from the effects of mortgage defaults perceived as harsh or unfair. Relying on such principles, a court may alter the specific terms of a loan to the extent it considers necessary to prevent or remedy an injustice, undue oppression or overreaching, or may require the lender to undertake affirmative actions to determine the cause of the borrower’s default and the likelihood that the borrower will be able to reinstate the loan. In some cases, courts have substituted their judgment for the lender’s and have required that lenders reinstate loans or recast payment schedules in order to accommodate borrowers who are suffering from a temporary financial disability. In other cases, courts have limited the right of the lender to foreclose in the case of a nonmonetary default, such as a failure to adequately maintain the mortgaged property or an impermissible further encumbrance of the mortgaged property. Finally, some courts have addressed the issue of whether federal or state constitutional provisions reflecting due process concerns for adequate notice require
529
that a borrower receive notice in addition to statutorily-prescribed minimum notice. For the most part, these cases have upheld the reasonableness of the notice provisions or have found that a public sale under a mortgage providing for a power of sale does not involve sufficient state action to trigger constitutional protections.
In addition, some states may have statutory protection such as the right of the borrower to reinstate a mortgage loan after commencement of foreclosure proceedings but prior to a foreclosure sale.
Nonjudicial Foreclosure/Power of Sale
In states permitting nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings, foreclosure of a deed of trust is generally accomplished by a nonjudicial trustee’s sale pursuant to a power of sale typically granted in the deed of trust. A power of sale may also be contained in any other type of mortgage instrument if applicable law so permits. A power of sale under a deed of trust allows a nonjudicial public sale to be conducted generally following a request from the beneficiary/lender to the trustee to sell the property upon default by the borrower and after notice of sale is given in accordance with the terms of the deed of trust and applicable state law. In some states, prior to such sale, the trustee under the deed of trust must record a notice of default and notice of sale and send a copy to the borrower and to any other party who has recorded a request for a copy of a notice of default and notice of sale. In addition, in some states the trustee must provide notice to any other party having an interest of record in the real property, including junior lienholders. A notice of sale must be posted in a public place and, in most states, published for a specified period of time in one or more newspapers. The borrower or junior lienholder may then have the right, during a reinstatement period required in some states, to cure the default by paying the entire actual amount in arrears (without regard to the acceleration of the indebtedness), plus the lender’s expenses incurred in enforcing the obligation. In other states, the borrower or the junior lienholder is not provided a period to reinstate the loan, but has only the right to pay off the entire debt to prevent the foreclosure sale. Generally, state law governs the procedure for public sale, the parties entitled to notice, the method of giving notice and the applicable time periods.
Public Sale
A third party may be unwilling to purchase a mortgaged property at a public sale because of the difficulty in determining the exact status of title to the property (due to, among other things, redemption rights that may exist) and because of the possibility that physical deterioration of the mortgaged property may have occurred during the foreclosure proceedings. Potential buyers may also be reluctant to purchase mortgaged property at a foreclosure sale as a result of the 1980 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Durrett v. Washington National Insurance Co., 621 F.2d 2001 (5th Cir. 1980) and other decisions that have followed its reasoning. The court in Durrett held that even a non-collusive, regularly conducted foreclosure sale was a fraudulent transfer under the Bankruptcy Code and, thus, could be rescinded in favor of the bankrupt’s estate, if (1) the foreclosure sale was held while the debtor was insolvent and not more than one year prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition and (2) the price paid for the foreclosed property did not represent “fair consideration”, which is “reasonably equivalent value” under the Bankruptcy Code. Although the reasoning and result of Durrett in respect of the Bankruptcy Code was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531 (1994), the case could nonetheless be persuasive to a court applying a state fraudulent conveyance law which has provisions similar to those construed in Durrett. Therefore, it is common for the lender to purchase the mortgaged property for
530
an amount equal to the secured indebtedness and accrued and unpaid interest plus the expenses of foreclosure, in which event the borrower’s debt will be extinguished, or for a lesser amount in order to preserve its right to seek a deficiency judgment if such is available under state law and under the terms of the mortgage loan documents. Thereafter, subject to the borrower’s right in some states to remain in possession during a redemption period, the lender will become the owner of the property and have both the benefits and burdens of ownership, including the obligation to pay debt service on any senior mortgages, to pay taxes, to obtain casualty insurance and to make such repairs as are necessary to render the property suitable for sale. Frequently, the lender employs a third-party management company to manage and operate the property. The costs of operating and maintaining a property may be significant and may be greater than the income derived from that property. The costs of management and operation of those mortgaged properties which are hotels, motels, restaurants, nursing or convalescent homes, hospitals or casinos may be particularly significant because of the expertise, knowledge and, with respect to certain property types, regulatory compliance, required to run those operations and the effect which foreclosure and a change in ownership may have on the public’s and the industry’s, including franchisors’, perception of the quality of those operations. The lender also will commonly obtain the services of a real estate broker and pay the broker’s commission in connection with the sale or lease of the property. Depending upon market conditions, the ultimate proceeds of the sale of a property may not equal the lender’s investment in the property. Moreover, a lender commonly incurs substantial legal fees and court costs in acquiring a mortgaged property through contested foreclosure and/or bankruptcy proceedings. Because of the expenses associated with acquiring, owning and selling a mortgaged property, a lender could realize an overall loss on a mortgage loan even if the mortgaged property is sold at foreclosure, or resold after it is acquired through foreclosure, for an amount equal to the full outstanding principal amount of the loan plus accrued interest.
Furthermore, an increasing number of states require that any environmental contamination at certain types of properties be cleaned up before a property may be resold. In addition, a lender may be responsible under federal or state law for the cost of cleaning up a mortgaged property that is environmentally contaminated. See “—Environmental Considerations” below.
The holder of a junior mortgage that forecloses on a mortgaged property does so subject to senior mortgages and any other prior liens, and may be obliged to keep senior mortgage loans current in order to avoid foreclosure of its interest in the property. In addition, if the foreclosure of a junior mortgage triggers the enforcement of a “due-on-sale” clause contained in a senior mortgage, the junior mortgagee could be required to pay the full amount of the senior mortgage indebtedness or face foreclosure.
Rights of Redemption
The purposes of a foreclosure action are to enable the lender to realize upon its security and to bar the borrower, and all persons who have interests in the property that are subordinate to that of the foreclosing lender, from exercise of their “equity of redemption”. The doctrine of equity of redemption provides that, until the property encumbered by a mortgage has been sold in accordance with a properly conducted foreclosure and foreclosure sale, those having interests that are subordinate to that of the foreclosing lender have an equity of redemption and may redeem the property by paying the entire debt with interest. Those having an equity of redemption must generally be made parties and joined in the foreclosure proceeding in order for their equity of redemption to be terminated.
531
The equity of redemption is a common-law (nonstatutory) right which should be distinguished from post-sale statutory rights of redemption. In some states, after sale pursuant to a deed of trust or foreclosure of a mortgage, the borrower and foreclosed junior lienors are given a statutory period in which to redeem the property. In some states, statutory redemption may occur only upon payment of the foreclosure sale price. In other states, redemption may be permitted if the former borrower pays only a portion of the sums due. The effect of a statutory right of redemption is to diminish the ability of the lender to sell the foreclosed property because the exercise of a right of redemption would defeat the title of any purchaser through a foreclosure. Consequently, the practical effect of the redemption right is to force the lender to maintain the property and pay the expenses of ownership until the redemption period has expired. In some states, a post-sale statutory right of redemption may exist following a judicial foreclosure, but not following a trustee’s sale under a deed of trust.
Anti-Deficiency Legislation
Some or all of the mortgage loans are non-recourse loans, as to which recourse in the case of default will be limited to the mortgaged property and such other assets, if any, that were pledged to secure the mortgage loan. However, even if a mortgage loan by its terms provides for recourse to the borrower’s other assets, a lender’s ability to realize upon those assets may be limited by state law. For example, in some states a lender cannot obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower following foreclosure or sale under a deed of trust.
A deficiency judgment is a personal judgment against the former borrower equal to the difference between the net amount realized upon the public sale of the real property and the amount due to the lender. Other statutes may require the lender to exhaust the security afforded under a mortgage before bringing a personal action against the borrower. In certain other states, the lender has the option of bringing a personal action against the borrower on the debt without first exhausting that security; however, in some of those states, the lender, following judgment on that personal action, may be deemed to have elected a remedy and thus may be precluded from foreclosing upon the security. Consequently, lenders in those states where such an election of remedy provision exists will usually proceed first against the security. Finally, other statutory provisions, designed to protect borrowers from exposure to large deficiency judgments that might result from bidding at below-market values at the foreclosure sale, limit any deficiency judgment to the excess of the outstanding debt over the fair market value of the property at the time of the sale.
Leasehold Considerations
Mortgage loans may be secured by a mortgage on the borrower’s leasehold interest in a ground lease. Leasehold mortgage loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of the borrower. The most significant of these risks is that if the borrower’s leasehold were to be terminated upon a lease default, the leasehold mortgagee would lose its security. This risk may be lessened if the ground lease requires the lessor to give the leasehold mortgagee notices of lessee defaults and an opportunity to cure them, permits the leasehold estate to be assigned to and by the leasehold mortgagee or the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, and contains certain other protective provisions typically included in a “mortgageable” ground lease. Certain mortgage loans, however, may be secured by ground leases which do not contain these provisions.
In addition, where a lender has as its security both the fee and leasehold interest in the same property, the grant of a mortgage lien on its fee interest by the land owner/ground
532
lessor to secure the debt of a borrower/ground lessee may be subject to challenge as a fraudulent conveyance. Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of the liens may focus on the benefits realized by the land owner/ground lessor from the loan. If a court concluded that the granting of the mortgage lien was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance, it might take actions detrimental to the holders of the offered certificates, including, under certain circumstances, invalidating the mortgage lien on the fee interest of the land owner/ground lessor.
Cooperative Shares
Mortgage loans may be secured by a security interest on the borrower’s ownership interest in shares, and the related proprietary leases, allocable to cooperative dwelling units that may be vacant or occupied by non-owner tenants. Such loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of a borrower in real property. Such a loan typically is subordinate to the mortgage, if any, on the cooperative’s building which, if foreclosed, could extinguish the equity in the building and the proprietary leases of the dwelling units derived from ownership of the shares of the cooperative. Further, transfer of shares in a cooperative are subject to various regulations as well as to restrictions under the governing documents of the cooperative, and the shares may be cancelled in the event that associated maintenance charges due under the related proprietary leases are not paid. Typically, a recognition agreement between the lender and the cooperative provides, among other things, the lender with an opportunity to cure a default under a proprietary lease.
Under the laws applicable in many states, “foreclosure” on cooperative shares is accomplished by a sale in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the UCC and the security agreement relating to the shares. Article 9 of the UCC requires that a sale be conducted in a “commercially reasonable” manner, which may be dependent upon, among other things, the notice given the debtor and the method, manner, time, place and terms of the sale. Article 9 of the UCC provides that the proceeds of the sale will be applied first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale and then to satisfy the indebtedness secured by the lender’s security interest. A recognition agreement, however, generally provides that the lender’s right to reimbursement is subject to the right of the cooperative to receive sums due under the proprietary leases.
Bankruptcy Laws
Operation of the federal Bankruptcy Code in Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended from time to time (“Bankruptcy Code”) and related state laws may interfere with or affect the ability of a lender to obtain payment of a loan, realize upon collateral and/or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, under the Bankruptcy Code, virtually all actions (including foreclosure actions and deficiency judgment proceedings) are automatically stayed upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition, and, usually, no interest or principal payments are made during the course of the bankruptcy case. The delay and the consequences of a delay caused by an automatic stay can be significant. For example, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior mortgage lien holder may stay the senior lender from taking action to foreclose out such junior lien. At a minimum, the senior lender would suffer delay due to its need to seek bankruptcy court approval before taking any foreclosure or other action that could be deemed in violation of the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy trustee, or a borrower as debtor-in-possession, may under certain circumstances sell the related mortgaged property or other collateral free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests, which liens
533
would then attach to the proceeds of such sale, despite the provisions of the related mortgage or other security agreement to the contrary. Such a sale may be approved by a bankruptcy court even if the proceeds are insufficient to pay the secured debt in full.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, provided certain substantive and procedural safeguards for a lender are met, the amount and terms of a mortgage or other security agreement secured by property of a debtor may be modified under certain circumstances. Pursuant to a confirmed plan of reorganization, lien avoidance or claim objection proceeding, the secured claim arising from a loan secured by real property or other collateral may be reduced to the then-current value of the property (with a corresponding partial reduction of the amount of lender’s security interest), thus leaving the lender a secured creditor to the extent of the then current value of the property and a general unsecured creditor for the difference between such value and the outstanding balance of the loan. Such general unsecured claims may be paid less than 100% of the amount of the debt or not at all, depending upon the circumstances. Other modifications may include the reduction in the amount of each scheduled payment, which reduction may result from a reduction in the rate of interest and/or the alteration of the repayment schedule (with or without affecting the unpaid principal balance of the loan), and/or an extension (or reduction) of the final maturity date. Some courts have approved bankruptcy plans, based on the particular facts of the reorganization case, that effected the curing of a mortgage loan default by paying arrearages over a number of years. Also, under the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy court may permit a debtor through its plan of reorganization to reinstate the loan even though the lender accelerated the mortgage loan and final judgment of foreclosure had been entered in state court (provided that no sale of the property had yet occurred) prior to the filing of the debtor’s petition. This may be done even if the plan of reorganization does not provide for payment of the full amount due under the original loan. Thus, the full amount due under the original loan may never be repaid. Other types of significant modifications to the terms of a mortgage loan may be acceptable to the bankruptcy court, such as making distributions to the mortgage holder of property other than cash, or the substitution of collateral which is the “indubitable equivalent” of the real property subject to the mortgage, or the subordination of the mortgage to liens securing new debt (provided that the lender’s secured claim is “adequately protected” as such term is defined and interpreted under the Bankruptcy Code), often depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the specific case.
Federal bankruptcy law may also interfere with or otherwise adversely affect the ability of a secured mortgage lender to enforce an assignment by a borrower of rents and leases (which “rents” may include revenues from hotels and other lodging facilities specified in the Bankruptcy Code) related to a mortgaged property if the related borrower is in a bankruptcy proceeding. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a lender may be stayed from enforcing the assignment, and the legal proceedings necessary to resolve the issue can be time consuming and may result in significant delays in the receipt of the rents. Rents (including applicable hotel and other lodging revenues) and leases may also escape such an assignment, among other things, (i) if the assignment is not fully perfected under state law prior to commencement of the bankruptcy proceeding, (ii) to the extent such rents and leases are used by the borrower to maintain the mortgaged property, or for other court authorized expenses, (iii) to the extent other collateral may be substituted for the rents and leases, (iv) to the extent the bankruptcy court determines that the lender is adequately protected, or (v) to the extent the court determines based on the equities of the case that the post-petition rents are not subject to the lender’s pre-petition security interest.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, a security interest in real property acquired before the commencement of the bankruptcy case does not extend to income received after the
534
commencement of the bankruptcy case unless such income is a proceed, product or rent of such property. Therefore, to the extent a business conducted on the mortgaged property creates accounts receivable rather than rents or results from payments under a license rather than payments under a lease, a valid and perfected pre-bankruptcy lien on such accounts receivable or license income generally would not continue as to post-bankruptcy accounts receivable or license income.
The Bankruptcy Code provides that a lender’s perfected pre-petition security interest in leases, rents and hotel revenues continues in the post-petition leases, rents and hotel revenues, unless a bankruptcy court orders to the contrary “based on the equities of the case”. The equities of a particular case may permit the discontinuance of security interests in pre-petition leases and rents. Thus, unless a court orders otherwise, revenues from a mortgaged property generated after the date the bankruptcy petition is filed will constitute “cash collateral” under the Bankruptcy Code. Debtors may only use cash collateral upon obtaining the lender’s consent or a prior court order finding that the lender’s interest in the mortgaged hotel, motel or other lodging property and the cash collateral is “adequately protected” as the term is defined and interpreted under the Bankruptcy Code. In addition to post-petition rents, any cash held by a lender in a lockbox or reserve account generally would also constitute “cash collateral” under the Bankruptcy Code. So long as the lender is adequately protected, a debtor’s use of cash collateral may be for its own benefit or for the benefit of any affiliated entity group that is also subject to bankruptcy proceedings, including use as collateral for new debt. It should be noted, however, that the court may find that the lender has no security interest in either pre-petition or post-petition revenues if the court finds that the loan documents do not contain language covering accounts, room rents, or other forms of personalty necessary for a security interest to attach to such revenues.
The Bankruptcy Code provides generally that rights and obligations under an unexpired lease of the debtor/lessee may not be terminated or modified at any time after the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code solely because of a provision in the lease to that effect or because of certain other similar events. This prohibition on so-called “ipso facto” clauses could limit the ability of a lender to exercise certain contractual remedies with respect to the leases on any mortgaged property. In addition, section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code operates as an automatic stay of, among other things, any act to obtain possession of property from a debtor’s estate, which may delay a lender’s exercise of those remedies, including foreclosure, in the event that a lessee becomes the subject of a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code. Thus, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a lessee of a mortgaged property would result in a stay against the commencement or continuation of any state court proceeding for past due rent, for accelerated rent, for damages or for a summary eviction order with respect to a default under the related lease that occurred prior to the filing of the lessee’s petition. While relief from the automatic stay to enforce remedies may be requested, it can be denied for a number of reasons, including where the collateral is “necessary to an effective reorganization” for the debtor, and if a debtor’s case has been administratively consolidated with those of its affiliates, the court may also consider whether the property is “necessary to an effective reorganization” of the debtor and its affiliates, taken as a whole.
The Bankruptcy Code generally provides that a trustee in bankruptcy or debtor-in-possession may, with respect to an unexpired lease of non-residential real property, before the earlier of (i) 120 days after the filing of a bankruptcy case or (ii) the entry of an order confirming a plan, subject to approval of the court, (a) assume the lease and retain it or assign it to a third party or (b) reject the lease. If the trustee or debtor-in-possession fails to assume or reject the lease within the time specified in the
535
preceding sentence, subject to any extensions by the bankruptcy court, the lease will be deemed rejected and the property will be surrendered to the lessor. The bankruptcy court may for cause shown extend the 120-day period up to 90 days for a total of 210 days. If the lease is assumed, the trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of the lessee, or the lessee as debtor-in-possession, or the assignee, if applicable, must cure any defaults under the lease, compensate the lessor for its losses and provide the lessor with “adequate assurance” of future performance. These remedies may be insufficient, however, as the lessor may be forced to continue under the lease with a lessee that is a poor credit risk or an unfamiliar tenant (if the lease was assigned), and any assurances provided to the lessor may, in fact, be inadequate. If the lease is rejected, the rejection generally constitutes a breach of the executory contract or unexpired lease as of the date immediately preceding the filing date of the bankruptcy petition. As a consequence, the other party or parties to the lease, such as the borrower, as lessor under a lease, generally would have only an unsecured claim against the debtor, as lessee, for damages resulting from the breach, which could adversely affect the security for the related mortgage loan. In addition, under the Bankruptcy Code, a lease rejection damages claim is limited to the “(a) rent reserved by the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year, or 15 percent, not to exceed 3 years, of the remaining term of such lease, following the earlier of the date of the bankruptcy petition and the date on which the lessor regained possession of the real property, (b) plus any unpaid rent due under such lease, without acceleration, on the earlier of such dates”.
If a trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of a lessor, or a lessor as debtor-in-possession, rejects an unexpired lease of real property, the lessee may treat the lease as terminated by the rejection or, in the alternative, the lessee may remain in possession of the leasehold for the balance of the term and for any renewal or extension of the term that is enforceable by the lessee under applicable non-bankruptcy law. The Bankruptcy Code provides that if a lessee elects to remain in possession after a rejection of a lease, the lessee may offset against rents reserved under the lease for the balance of the term after the date of rejection of the lease, and the related renewal or extension of the lease, any damages occurring after that date caused by the nonperformance of any obligation of the lessor under the lease after that date.
Similarly, bankruptcy risk is associated with an insolvency proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code of either a borrower ground lessee or a ground lessor. In general, upon the bankruptcy of a lessor or a lessee under a lease of nonresidential real property, including a ground lease, that has not been terminated prior to the bankruptcy filing date, the debtor entity has the statutory right to assume or reject the lease. Given that the Bankruptcy Code generally invalidates clauses that terminate contracts automatically upon the filing by one of the parties of a bankruptcy petition or that are conditioned on a party’s insolvency, following the filing of a bankruptcy petition, a debtor would ordinarily be required to perform its obligations under such lease until the debtor decides whether to assume or reject the lease. The Bankruptcy Code provides certain additional protections with respect to non-residential real property leases, such as establishing a specific timeframe in which a debtor must determine whether to assume or reject the lease. The bankruptcy court may extend the time to perform for up to 60 days for cause shown. Even if the agreements were terminated prior to bankruptcy, a bankruptcy court may determine that the agreement was improperly terminated and therefore remains part of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. The debtor also can seek bankruptcy court approval to assume and assign the lease to a third party, and to modify the lease in connection with such assignment. In order to assume the lease, the debtor or assignee generally will have to cure outstanding defaults and provide “adequate assurance of future performance” in addition to satisfying other requirements imposed under the Bankruptcy Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code, subject to certain exceptions, once a lease is rejected by a debtor lessee,
536
it is deemed breached, and the non-debtor lessor will have a claim for lease rejection damages, as described above.
If the ground lessor files for bankruptcy, it may determine until the confirmation of its plan of reorganization whether to reject the ground lease. On request of any party to the lease, the bankruptcy court may order the debtor to determine within a specific period of time whether to assume or reject the lease or to comply with the terms of the lease pending its decision to assume or reject. In the event of rejection, the non-debtor lessee will have the right to treat the lease as terminated by virtue of its terms, applicable nonbankruptcy law, or any agreement made by the lessee. The non-debtor lessee may also, if the lease term has begun, retain its rights under the lease, including its rights to remain in possession of the leased premises under the rent reserved in the lease for the balance of the term of the lease (including renewals). The term “lessee” includes any “successor, assign or mortgagee permitted under the terms of such lease”. If, pre-petition, the ground lessor had specifically granted the leasehold mortgagee such right, the leasehold mortgagee may have the right to succeed to the lessee/borrower’s position under the lease.
In the event of concurrent bankruptcy proceedings involving the ground lessor and the lessee/borrower, actions by creditors against the borrower/lessee debtor would be subject to the automatic stay, and a lender may be unable to enforce both the bankrupt lessee/borrower’s pre-petition agreement to refuse to treat a ground lease rejected by a bankrupt lessor as terminated and any agreement by the ground lessor to grant the lender a new lease upon such termination. In such circumstances, a lease could be terminated notwithstanding lender protection provisions contained in that lease or in the mortgage. A lender could lose its security unless the lender holds a fee mortgage or the bankruptcy court, as a court of equity, allows the mortgagee to assume the ground lessee’s obligations under the ground lease and succeed to the ground lessee’s position. Although consistent with the Bankruptcy Code, such position may not be adopted by the bankruptcy court.
Further, in an appellate decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Precision Indus. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC, 327 F.3d 537 (7th Cir, 2003)), the court ruled with respect to an unrecorded lease of real property that where a statutory sale of leased property occurs under the Bankruptcy Code upon the bankruptcy of a landlord, that sale terminates a lessee’s possessory interest in the property, and the purchaser assumes title free and clear of any interest, including any leasehold estates. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, a lessee may request the bankruptcy court to prohibit or condition the statutory sale of the property so as to provide adequate protection of the leasehold interest; however, the court ruled that, at least where a memorandum of lease had not been recorded, this provision does not ensure continued possession of the property, but rather entitles the lessee to compensation for the value of its leasehold interest, typically from the sale proceeds. As a result, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a statutory sale of leased property pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the lessee would be able to maintain possession of the property under the ground lease. In addition, we cannot assure you that a leasehold mortgagor and/or a leasehold mortgagee (to the extent it has standing to intervene) would be able to recover the full value of the leasehold interest in bankruptcy court.
Because of the possible termination of the related ground lease, whether arising from a bankruptcy, the expiration of a lease term or an uncured defect under the related ground lease, lending on a leasehold interest in a real property is riskier than lending on the fee interest in the property.
In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving a borrower, action may be taken seeking the recovery as a preferential transfer of any payments made by such borrower, or made
537
directly by the related lessee, under the related mortgage loan to the issuing entity. Payments on long term debt may be protected from recovery as preferences if they qualify for the “ordinary course” exception under the Bankruptcy Code or if certain other defenses in the Bankruptcy Code are applicable. Whether any particular payment would be protected depends upon the facts specific to a particular transaction.
In addition, in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving any borrower or an affiliate, an action may be taken to avoid the transaction (or any component of the transaction, such as joint and several liability on the related mortgage loan) as an actual or constructive fraudulent conveyance under state or federal law. Any payment by a borrower in excess of its allocated share of the loan could be challenged as a fraudulent conveyance by creditors of that borrower in an action outside a bankruptcy case or by the representative of the borrower’s bankruptcy estate in a bankruptcy case. Generally, under federal and most state fraudulent conveyance statutes, the incurrence of an obligation or the transfer of property by a person will be subject to avoidance under certain circumstances if the person transferred such property with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud its creditors or the person did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such obligation or transfer and (i) was insolvent or was rendered insolvent by such obligation or transfer, (ii) was engaged in business or a transaction, or was about to engage in business or a transaction, for which any property remaining with the person constituted unreasonably small capital, or (iii) intended to, or believed that it would, incur debts that would be beyond the person’s ability to pay as such debts matured. The measure of insolvency will vary depending on the law of the applicable jurisdiction. However, an entity will generally be considered insolvent if the present fair salable value of its assets is less than (x) the sum of its debts or (y) the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts as they become absolute and matured. Accordingly, a lien granted by a borrower to secure repayment of the loan in excess of its allocated share could be avoided if a court were to determine that (i) such borrower was insolvent at the time of granting the lien, was rendered insolvent by the granting of the lien, was left with inadequate capital, or was not able to pay its debts as they matured and (ii) the borrower did not, when it allowed its property to be encumbered by a lien securing the entire indebtedness represented by the loan, receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for pledging such property for the equal benefit of each other borrower.
A bankruptcy court may, under certain circumstances, authorize a debtor to obtain credit after the commencement of a bankruptcy case, secured among other things, by senior, equal or junior liens on property that is already subject to a lien. In the bankruptcy case of General Growth Properties filed on April 16, 2009, the debtors initially sought approval of a debtor-in-possession loan to the corporate parent entities guaranteed by the property-level single purpose entities and secured by second liens on their properties. Although the debtor-in-possession loan subsequently was modified to eliminate the subsidiary guarantees and second liens, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a bankruptcy of the borrower sponsor, the borrower sponsor would not seek approval of a similar debtor-in-possession loan, or that a bankruptcy court would not approve a debtor-in-possession loan that included such subsidiary guarantees and second liens on such subsidiaries’ properties.
Certain of the borrowers may be partnerships. The laws governing limited partnerships in certain states provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to a general partner will cause a person to cease to be a general partner of the limited partnership, unless otherwise provided in writing in the limited partnership agreement. This provision may be construed as an “ipso facto” clause and, in the event of the general partner’s bankruptcy, may not be enforceable. Certain limited partnership
538
agreements of the borrowers may provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the related general partner constitutes an event of withdrawal (assuming the enforceability of the clause is not challenged in bankruptcy proceedings or, if challenged, is upheld) that might trigger the dissolution of the limited partnership, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets, unless (i) at the time there was at least one other general partner and the written provisions of the limited partnership permit the business of the limited partnership to be carried on by the remaining general partner and that general partner does so or (ii) the written provisions of the limited partnership agreement permit the limited partners to agree within a specified time frame (often 60 days) after the withdrawal to continue the business of the limited partnership and to the appointment of one or more general partners and the limited partners do so. In addition, the laws governing general partnerships in certain states provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code or state bankruptcy laws with respect to a general partner of the partnerships triggers the dissolution of the partnership, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets. Those state laws, however, may not be enforceable or effective in a bankruptcy case. Limited liability companies may be subjected to similar treatment as that described in this prospectus with respect to limited partnerships. The dissolution of a borrower, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets could result in an acceleration of its payment obligation under the borrower’s mortgage loan, which may reduce the yield on the Offered Certificates in the same manner as a principal prepayment.
In addition, the bankruptcy of the general or limited partner of a borrower that is a partnership, or the bankruptcy of a member of a borrower that is a limited liability company or the bankruptcy of a shareholder of a borrower that is a corporation may provide the opportunity in the bankruptcy case of the partner, member or shareholder to obtain an order from a court consolidating the assets and liabilities of the partner, member or shareholder with those of the mortgagor pursuant to the doctrines of substantive consolidation or piercing the corporate veil. In such a case, the respective mortgaged property, for example, would become property of the estate of the bankrupt partner, member or shareholder. Not only would the mortgaged property be available to satisfy the claims of creditors of the partner, member or shareholder, but an automatic stay would apply to any attempt by the trustee to exercise remedies with respect to the mortgaged property. However, such an occurrence should not affect a lender’s status as a secured creditor with respect to the mortgagor or its security interest in the mortgaged property.
A borrower that is a limited partnership, in many cases, may be required by the loan documents to have a single purpose entity as its sole general partner, and a borrower that is a general partnership, in many cases, may be required by the loan documents to have as its general partners only entities that are single purpose entities. A borrower that is a limited liability company may be required by the loan documents to have a single purpose member or a springing member. All borrowers that are tenants-in-common may be required by the loan documents to be single purpose entities. These provisions are designed to mitigate the risk of the dissolution or bankruptcy of the borrower partnership or its general partner, a borrower limited liability company or its member (if applicable), or a borrower that is a tenant-in-common. However, we cannot assure you that any borrower partnership or its general partner, or any borrower limited liability company or its member (if applicable), or a borrower that is a tenant-in-common, will not dissolve or become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.
539
Environmental Considerations
General
A lender may be subject to environmental risks when taking a security interest in real property. Of particular concern may be properties that are or have been used for industrial, manufacturing, military or disposal activity. Such environmental risks include the possible diminution of the value of a contaminated property or, as discussed below, potential liability for clean-up costs or other remedial actions that could exceed the value of the property or the amount of the lender’s loan. In certain circumstances, a lender may decide to abandon a contaminated mortgaged property as collateral for its loan rather than foreclose and risk liability for clean-up costs.
Superlien Laws
Under the laws of many states, contamination on a property may give rise to a lien on the property for clean-up costs. In several states, such a lien has priority over all existing liens, including those of existing mortgages. In these states, the lien of a mortgage may lose its priority to such a “superlien”.
CERCLA
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), imposes strict liability on present and past “owners” and “operators” of contaminated real property for the costs of clean-up. A secured lender may be liable as an “owner” or “operator” of a contaminated mortgaged property if agents or employees of the lender have participated in the management or operation of such mortgaged property. Such liability may exist even if the lender did not cause or contribute to the contamination and regardless of whether the lender has actually taken possession of a mortgaged property through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise. Moreover, such liability is not limited to the original or unamortized principal balance of a loan or to the value of the property securing a loan. Excluded from CERCLA’s definition of “owner” or “operator,” however, is a person “who, without participating in the management of the facility, holds indicia of ownership primarily to protect his security interest”. This is the so called “secured creditor exemption”.
The Asset Conservation, Lender Liability and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1996 (the “1996 Act”) amended, among other things, the provisions of CERCLA with respect to lender liability and the secured creditor exemption. The 1996 Act offers protection to lenders by defining the activities in which a lender can engage and still have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption. In order for a lender to be deemed to have participated in the management of a mortgaged property, the lender must actually participate in the operational affairs of the property of the borrower. The 1996 Act provides that “merely having the capacity to influence, or unexercised right to control” operations does not constitute participation in management. A lender will lose the protection of the secured creditor exemption if it exercises decision-making control over the borrower’s environmental compliance and hazardous substance handling or disposal practices, or assumes day-to-day management of environmental or substantially all other operational functions of the mortgaged property. The 1996 Act also provides that a lender will continue to have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption even if it forecloses on a mortgaged property, purchases it at a foreclosure sale or accepts a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, provided that the lender seeks to sell the mortgaged property at the earliest practicable commercially reasonable time on commercially reasonable terms.
540
Certain Other Federal and State Laws
Many states have statutes similar to CERCLA, and not all of those statutes provide for a secured creditor exemption. In addition, under federal law, there is potential liability relating to hazardous wastes and underground storage tanks under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
Some federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the management, removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos-containing materials. These laws, as well as common law standards, may impose liability for releases of or exposure to asbestos-containing materials, and provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injuries associated with those releases.
Federal legislation requires owners of residential housing constructed prior to 1978 to disclose to potential residents or purchasers any known lead-based paint hazards and will impose treble damages for any failure to disclose. In addition, the ingestion of lead-based paint chips or dust particles by children can result in lead poisoning. If lead-based paint hazards exist at a property, then the owner of that property may be held liable for injuries and for the costs of removal or encapsulation of the lead-based paint.
In a few states, transfers of some types of properties are conditioned upon clean-up of contamination prior to transfer. In these cases, a lender that becomes the owner of a property through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, may be required to clean up the contamination before selling or otherwise transferring the property.
Beyond statute-based environmental liability, there exist common law causes of action (for example, actions based on nuisance or on toxic tort resulting in death, personal injury or damage to property) related to hazardous environmental conditions on a property. While it may be more difficult to hold a lender liable under common law causes of action, unanticipated or uninsured liabilities of the borrower may jeopardize the borrower’s ability to meet its loan obligations or may decrease the re-sale value of the collateral.
Additional Considerations
The cost of remediating hazardous substance contamination at a property can be substantial. If a lender becomes liable, it can bring an action for contribution against the owner or operator who created the environmental hazard, but that individual or entity may be without substantial assets. Accordingly, it is possible that such costs could become a liability of the issuing entity and occasion a loss to the certificateholders.
If a lender forecloses on a mortgage secured by a property, the operations on which are subject to environmental laws and regulations, the lender will be required to operate the property in accordance with those laws and regulations. Such compliance may entail substantial expense, especially in the case of industrial or manufacturing properties.
In addition, a lender may be obligated to disclose environmental conditions on a property to government entities and/or to prospective buyers (including prospective buyers at a foreclosure sale or following foreclosure). Such disclosure may decrease the amount that prospective buyers are willing to pay for the affected property, sometimes substantially, and thereby decrease the ability of the lender to recover its investment in a loan upon foreclosure.
541
Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions
Certain of the mortgage loans may contain “due-on-sale” and “due-on-encumbrance” clauses that purport to permit the lender to accelerate the maturity of the loan if the borrower transfers or encumbers the related mortgaged property. The Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 (the “Garn Act”) generally preempts state laws that prohibit the enforcement of due-on-sale clauses and permits lenders to enforce these clauses in accordance with their terms, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the Garn Act and related regulations. Accordingly, a lender may nevertheless have the right to accelerate the maturity of a mortgage loan that contains a “due-on-sale” provision upon transfer of an interest in the property, without regard to the lender’s ability to demonstrate that a sale threatens its legitimate security interest.
Subordinate Financing
The terms of certain of the mortgage loans may not restrict the ability of the borrower to use the mortgaged property as security for one or more additional loans, or such restrictions may be unenforceable. Where a borrower encumbers a mortgaged property with one or more junior liens, the senior lender is subjected to additional risk. First, the borrower may have difficulty servicing and repaying multiple loans. Moreover, if the subordinate financing permits recourse to the borrower (as-is frequently the case) and the senior loan does not, a borrower may have more incentive to repay sums due on the subordinate loan. Second, acts of the senior lender that prejudice the junior lender or impair the junior lender’s security may create a superior equity in favor of the junior lender. For example, if the borrower and the senior lender agree to an increase in the principal amount of or the interest rate payable on the senior loan, the senior lender may lose its priority to the extent any existing junior lender is harmed or the borrower is additionally burdened. Third, if the borrower defaults on the senior loan and/or any junior loan or loans, the existence of junior loans and actions taken by junior lenders can impair the security available to the senior lender and can interfere with or delay the taking of action by the senior lender. Moreover, the bankruptcy of a junior lender may operate to stay foreclosure or similar proceedings by the senior lender.
Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments
Promissory notes and mortgages may contain provisions that obligate the borrower to pay a late charge or additional interest if payments are not timely made, and in some circumstances, may prohibit prepayments for a specified period and/or condition prepayments upon the borrower’s payment of prepayment fees or yield maintenance penalties. In certain states, there are or may be specific limitations upon the late charges which a lender may collect from a borrower for delinquent payments. Certain states also limit the amounts that a lender may collect from a borrower as an additional charge if the loan is prepaid. In addition, the enforceability of provisions that provide for prepayment fees or penalties upon an involuntary prepayment is unclear under the laws of many states.
Applicability of Usury Laws
Title V of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“Title V”) provides that state usury limitations will not apply to certain types of residential (including multifamily) first mortgage loans originated by certain lenders after March 31, 1980. Title V authorized any state to reimpose interest rate limits by adopting, before April 1, 1983, a law or constitutional provision that expressly rejects application of the federal law. In addition, even where Title V is not so rejected, any state is authorized by the law to adopt a provision limiting discount points or other charges on mortgage loans covered by
542
Title V. Certain states have taken action to reimpose interest rate limits and/or to limit discount points or other charges.
Statutes differ in their provisions as to the consequences of a usurious loan. One group of statutes requires the lender to forfeit the interest due above the applicable limit or impose a specified penalty. Under this statutory scheme, the borrower may cancel the recorded mortgage or deed of trust upon paying its debt with lawful interest, and the lender may foreclose, but only for the debt plus lawful interest. A second group of statutes is more severe. A violation of this type of usury law results in the invalidation of the transaction, thereby permitting the borrower to cancel the recorded mortgage or deed of trust without any payment or prohibiting the lender from foreclosing.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and related regulations (collectively, the “ADA”), in order to protect individuals with disabilities, public accommodations (such as hotel properties, restaurants, shopping centers, hospitals, schools and social service center establishments) must remove architectural and communication barriers which are structural in nature from existing places of public accommodation to the extent “readily achievable”. In addition, under the ADA, alterations to a place of public accommodation or a commercial facility are to be made so that, to the maximum extent feasible, such altered portions are readily accessible to and usable by disabled individuals. The “readily achievable” standard takes into account, among other factors, the financial resources of the affected site, owner, landlord or other applicable person. In addition to imposing a possible financial burden on the borrower in its capacity as owner or landlord, the ADA may also impose such requirements on a foreclosing lender who succeeds to the interest of the borrower as owner or landlord. Furthermore, since the “readily achievable” standard may vary depending on the financial condition of the owner or landlord, a foreclosing lender who is financially more capable than the borrower of complying with the requirements of the ADA may be subject to more stringent requirements than those to which the borrower is subject.
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act
Under the terms of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act as amended (the “Relief Act”), a borrower who enters military service after the origination of such borrower’s mortgage loan (including a borrower who was in reserve status and is called to active duty after origination of the mortgage loan), upon notification by such borrower, will not be charged interest, including fees and charges, in excess of 6% per annum during the period of such borrower’s active duty status. In addition to adjusting the interest, the lender must forgive any such interest in excess of 6% unless a court or administrative agency orders otherwise upon application of the lender. The Relief Act applies to individuals who are members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, Reserves, Coast Guard and officers of the U.S. Public Health Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration assigned to duty with the military. Because the Relief Act applies to individuals who enter military service (including reservists who are called to active duty) after origination of the related mortgage loan, no information can be provided as to the number of loans with individuals as borrowers that may be affected by the Relief Act. Application of the Relief Act would adversely affect, for an indeterminate period of time, the ability of the master servicer or special servicer to collect full amounts of interest on certain of the mortgage loans. Any shortfalls in interest collections resulting from the application of the Relief Act would result in a reduction of the amounts distributable to the holders of certificates, and would not be covered by advances or, any form of credit support provided in connection with the
543
certificates. In addition, the Relief Act imposes limitations that would impair the ability of a lender to foreclose on an affected mortgage loan during the borrower’s period of active duty status, and, under certain circumstances, during an additional three-month period thereafter.
Anti-Money Laundering, Economic Sanctions and Bribery
Many jurisdictions have adopted wide-ranging anti-money laundering, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, and regulations (collectively, the “Requirements”). Any of the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters or other party to the PSA could be requested or required to obtain certain assurances from prospective investors intending to purchase certificates and to retain such information or to disclose information pertaining to them to governmental, regulatory or other authorities or to financial intermediaries or engage in due diligence or take other related actions in the future. Failure to honor any request by the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters or other party to the PSA to provide requested information or take such other actions as may be necessary or advisable for the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters or other party to the PSA to comply with any Requirements, related legal process or appropriate requests (whether formal or informal) may result in, among other things, a forced sale to another investor of such investor’s certificates. In addition, it is expected that each of the depositor, the issuing entity, the underwriters and the other parties to the PSA will comply with the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (also known as the “Patriot Act”) and any other anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-corruption or anti-bribery laws, and regulations of the United States and other countries, and will disclose any information required or requested by authorities in connection with such compliance.
Potential Forfeiture of Assets
Federal law provides that assets (including property purchased or improved with assets) derived from criminal activity or otherwise tainted, or used in the commission of certain offenses, is subject to the blocking requirements of economic sanctions laws and regulations, and can be blocked and/or seized and ordered forfeited to the United States of America. The offenses that can trigger such a blocking and/or seizure and forfeiture include, among others, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, the anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism, economic sanctions, and anti-bribery laws and regulations, including the Patriot Act and the regulations issued pursuant to that act, as well as the narcotic drug laws, regardless of state law. In many instances, the United States may seize the property even before a conviction occurs.
In the event of a forfeiture proceeding, a lender may be able to establish its interest in the property by proving that (a) its mortgage was executed and recorded before the commission of the illegal conduct from which the assets used to purchase or improve the property were derived or before the commission of any other crime upon which the forfeiture is based, or (b) the lender, at the time of the execution of the mortgage, “did not know or was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture”. However, there is no assurance that such a defense will be successful.
544
Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties
UBS AG, New York Branch and its affiliates are playing several roles in this transaction. UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. is the depositor and a wholly-owned subsidiary of UBS Americas, Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG, New York Branch. UBS AG, New York Branch and the other mortgage loan sellers originated, co-originated or acquired the Mortgage Loans and will be selling them to the depositor. UBS AG, New York Branch is also an affiliate of UBS Securities LLC, one of the underwriters.
In addition, UBS AG, New York Branch currently holds one or more of the Park Place at Florham Park Pari Pass Companion Loans and AFIN Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans. However, UBS AG, New York Branch intends (but is under no obligation) to sell such Pari Passu Companion Loans in connection with a future securitization.
CIBC, a mortgage loan seller, a sponsor and an originator, is an affiliate of CIBC World Markets Corp., one of the underwriters.
CIBC is a party to a custodial agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, pursuant to which Wells Fargo Bank acts as an interim custodian with respect to the Mortgage Loan files for all of the CIBC mortgage loans.
Société Générale, a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller and the holder of certain of the AFIN Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans is an affiliate of SG Americas Securities, LLC, one of the underwriters.
Wells Fargo Bank and its affiliates are playing several roles in this transaction. Wells Fargo Bank is the trustee, the certificate administrator, the REMIC administrator, 17g-5 information provider, the custodian and the certificate registrar under this securitization. In addition, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is also (1) the trustee, the certificate administrator and the custodian under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 pooling and servicing agreement, which governs the servicing and administration of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers whole loan, (2) is the master servicer, the certificate administrator and the custodian under the UBS 2017-C7 pooling and servicing agreement, which is expected to govern the servicing and administration, until the securitization of the related control note, of the AFIN Portfolio whole loan and (3) is expected to be the trustee, certificate administrator and custodian under the BMARK 2018-B2 pooling and servicing agreement, which is expected to govern the servicing and administration of the BlueLinx Portfolio whole loan.
Wells Fargo Bank is (or, as of the Closing Date, is expected to be) the interim custodian of the loan files for some or all of the Rialto Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Rialto Mortgage, a sponsor, an originator and a mortgage loan seller, and certain affiliates of Rialto Mortgage, on the one hand, and Wells Fargo Bank, on the other hand, Wells Fargo Bank acts, from time to time, as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by Rialto Mortgage and such affiliates (subject, in some cases, to various repurchase facilities and other financing arrangements), including, prior to their inclusion in the trust fund, some or all of the Rialto Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Société Générale, a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller, and certain affiliates of Société Générale, on the one hand, and Wells Fargo Bank, on the other hand, Wells Fargo Bank acts, from time to time,
545
as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by Société Générale and such affiliates (subject, in some cases, to various repurchase facilities and other financing arrangements), including, prior to their inclusion in the trust fund, some or all of the Société Générale Mortgage Loans.
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller and the holder of certain of the CrossPoint Pari Passu Companion Loans, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, a primary servicer. However, Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. or an affiliate intends to sell such Companion Loans in connection with one or more future securitizations or otherwise transfer them at any time.
Wells Fargo Bank and certain other third party lenders provide warehouse financing to the LCF Financing Affiliates through various repurchase facilities, borrowing base facilities or other financing arrangements. Some or all of the LCF Mortgage Loans are (or, as of the Closing Date, may be) subject to those financing arrangements. If such is the case at the time the certificates are issued, then LCF will use the proceeds from its sale of the LCF Mortgage Loans to the depositor to, among other things, acquire the warehoused LCF Mortgage Loans from the LCF Financing Affiliates, and the LCF Financing Affiliates will, in turn, use the funds that they receive from LCF to, among other things, reacquire or obtain the release of, as applicable, the warehoused LCF Mortgage Loans from the repurchase agreement counterparties/lenders free and clear of any liens.
As of the date of this prospectus, none of the LCF Mortgage Loans were subject to the repurchase facility with Wells Fargo Bank. However, one or more LCF Mortgage Loans may become subject to that repurchase facility prior to the Closing Date.
In addition, Wells Fargo Bank is (or, as of the Closing Date, is expected to be) the interim custodian with respect to the loan files for all of the LCF Mortgage Loans.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between LCF, and certain affiliates of LCF, on the one hand, and Wells Fargo Bank, on the other hand, Wells Fargo Bank acts, from time to time, as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by LCF and such affiliates (subject, in some cases, to various repurchase facilities and other financing arrangements, including the repurchase facility provided by Wells Fargo Bank described above), including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, some or all of the LCF Mortgage Loans.
LCF is affiliated with the borrowers under the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A-1 as Dollar General Winterset, Dollar General Bay City and Dollar General Rockford, collectively representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance. LCF or an affiliate thereof originated each of those Mortgage Loans, and LCF is the mortgage loan seller with respect to those Mortgage Loans. Those Mortgage Loans may contain provisions and terms that are more favorable to the respective borrowers thereunder than would otherwise have been the case if the lender and borrower were not affiliated, including: (i) the related Mortgage Loan documents permit transfers of the related Mortgaged Property and interests in the related borrower without the lender’s consent by the related borrower and by or to certain affiliates of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP or Ladder Capital Corp.; (ii) the related Mortgage Loan documents permit future mezzanine financing; (iii) there is no separate environmental indemnitor other than the related borrower; (iv) the related Mortgage Loan documents do not require that a borrower-related property manager be terminated in connection with a Mortgage Loan default; and (v) the lender will accept insurance coverage (including in some cases, self-insurance) provided by the tenant under its lease.
546
LCF or an affiliate thereof holds (subject to any applicable financing arrangements) the City Square and Clay Street Companion Loans. Each of these Companion Loans may, but is not required to be, included in a future securitization or otherwise sold at any time.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between UBS AG, New York Branch or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Midland acts as interim servicer with respect to certain UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity.
Pursuant to a certain servicing arrangement between Berkeley Point Capital LLC or one of its affiliates, on the one hand, and Midland on the other hand, Midland acts as an interim servicer with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, certain of the underlying Mortgage Loans originated by CCRE Lending or one of its affiliates.
Pursuant to a primary servicing agreement between Berkeley Point Capital LLC, an affiliate of CCRE Lending, on the one hand, and Midland, on the other hand, Berkeley Point Capital LLC is expected to have full cashiering subservicing duties with respect to three (3) of the CCRE Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 7.2% of the Initial Pool Balance. In addition, pursuant to a limited subservicing agreement between Berkeley Point Capital LLC and Midland, Berkeley Point Capital LLC is expected to have certain limited subservicing duties consisting of performing inspections and collecting financial statements with respect to three (3) CCRE Mortgage Loans , representing approximately 3.0% of the Initial Pool Balance.
Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Wells Fargo Bank, on the one hand, and Barclays, a sponsor, an originator and a mortgage loan seller, and certain affiliates of Barclays, on the other hand, Wells Fargo Bank acts, from time to time, as primary servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned by Barclays and/or such affiliates of Barclays, including, prior to their inclusion in the issuing entity, some or all of the Barclays Mortgage Loans.
Barclays, a sponsor, an originator and a mortgage loan seller is the current holder of one of the Houston Distribution Center Companion Loans and is an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters.
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, the operating advisor and asset representations reviewer, is also the operating advisor and asset representations reviewer under the CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA with respect to the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan.
See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer”, “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Asset Representations Reviewer”, “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Directing Certificateholder and the Companion Holders” and “—Risks Relating to the Mortgage Loans—Performance of the Mortgage Loans Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks”. For a description of certain other affiliations, relationships and related transactions, to the extent known and material, among the transaction parties, see the individual descriptions of the transaction parties under “Transaction Parties”.
547
Pending Legal Proceedings Involving Transaction Parties
While the sponsors have been involved in, and are currently involved in, certain litigation or potential litigation, including actions relating to repurchase claims, there are no legal proceedings pending, or any proceedings known to be contemplated by any governmental authorities, against the sponsors that are material to Certificateholders.
For a description of certain other material legal proceedings pending against the transaction parties, see the individual descriptions of the transaction parties under “Transaction Parties”.
Use of Proceeds
Certain of the net proceeds from the sale of the Offered Certificates, together with the net proceeds from the sale of the other certificates not being offered by this prospectus, will be used by the depositor to purchase the mortgage loans from the mortgage loan sellers and to pay certain expenses in connection with the issuance of the certificates.
Yield and Maturity Considerations
Yield Considerations
General
The yield to maturity on the Offered Certificates will depend upon the price paid by the investors, the rate and timing of the distributions in reduction of the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of the applicable class of Offered Certificates, the extent to which Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums allocated to the class of Offered Certificates are collected, and the rate, timing and severity of losses on the Mortgage Loans and the extent to which such losses are allocable in reduction of the Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of the class of Offered Certificates, as well as prevailing interest rates at the time of payment or loss realization.
Rate and Timing of Principal Payments
The rate and amount of distributions in reduction of the Certificate Balance of any class of Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates and the yield to maturity of any class of Offered Certificates will be directly related to the rate of payments of principal (both scheduled and unscheduled) on the Mortgage Loans, as well as borrower defaults and the severity of losses occurring upon a default and the resulting rate and timing of collections made in connection with liquidations of Mortgage Loans due to these defaults. Principal payments on the Mortgage Loans will be affected by their amortization schedules, lockout periods, defeasance provisions, provisions relating to the release and/or application of earnout reserves, provisions requiring prepayments in connection with the release of real property collateral, requirements to pay Yield Maintenance Charges or Prepayment Premiums in connection with principal payments, the dates on which balloon payments are due, incentives for a borrower to repay an ARD Loan by the related Anticipated Repayment Date, property release provisions, provisions relating to the application of earnout reserve funds, and any extensions of maturity dates by the master servicer or special servicer. While voluntary prepayments of some Mortgage Loans are generally prohibited during applicable prepayment lockout periods, effective prepayments may occur if a sufficiently significant portion of a mortgaged property is lost due to casualty or condemnation (including full repayment of the loan without yield maintenance following partial casualty
548
and the lender’s application of available proceeds to the debt). In addition, such distributions in reduction of Certificate Balances of the respective classes of Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates may result from repurchases of, or substitutions for, Mortgage Loans made by the sponsors due to missing or defective documentation or breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the Mortgage Loans as described under “Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements” or purchases of the Mortgage Loans in the manner described under “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”, and the exercise of purchase options by the holder of a mezzanine loan, if any. To the extent a Mortgage Loan requires payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium in connection with a voluntary prepayment, any such Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium generally is not due in connection with a prepayment due to casualty or condemnation, is not included in the purchase price of a Mortgage Loan purchased or repurchased due to a breach of a representation or warranty or otherwise, and may not be enforceable or collectible upon a default.
Because the certificates with Notional Amounts are not entitled to distributions of principal, the yield on such certificates will be extremely sensitive to prepayments received in respect of the Mortgage Loans to the extent distributed to reduce the related Notional Amount of the applicable class of certificates. In addition, although the borrower under an ARD Loan may have certain incentives to prepay such ARD Loan on its Anticipated Repayment Date, we cannot assure you that the borrower will be able to prepay such ARD Loan on its related Anticipated Repayment Date. The failure of the borrower to prepay an ARD Loan on its Anticipated Repayment Date will not be an event of default under the terms of such ARD Loan, and pursuant to the terms of the PSA, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be permitted to take any enforcement action with respect to the borrower’s failure to pay Excess Interest until the scheduled maturity of such ARD Loan; provided that the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, may take action to enforce the issuing entity’s right to apply excess cash flow to principal in accordance with the terms of the respective ARD Loan documents. With respect to the Class A-SB certificates, the extent to which the planned balances are achieved and the sensitivity of the Class A-SB certificates to principal prepayments on the mortgage loans will depend in part on the period of time during which the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates remain outstanding. As such, the Class A-SB certificates will become more sensitive to the rate of prepayments on the mortgage loans than they were when the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates were outstanding.
The extent to which the yield to maturity of any class of Offered Certificates may vary from the anticipated yield will depend upon the degree to which the certificates are purchased at a discount or premium and when, and to what degree, payments of principal on the Mortgage Loans are in turn distributed on the certificates or, in the case of the Class X-A or Class X-B certificates with a Notional Amount, applied to reduce their Notional Amounts. An investor should consider, in the case of any certificate (other than a certificate with a Notional Amount) purchased at a discount, the risk that a slower than anticipated rate of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans could result in an actual yield to such investor that is lower than the anticipated yield and, in the case of any certificate purchased at a premium (including certificates with Notional Amounts), the risk that a faster than anticipated rate of principal payments could result in an actual yield to such investor that is lower than the anticipated yield. In general, the earlier a payment of principal on the Mortgage Loans is distributed or otherwise results in reduction of the Certificate Balance of a certificate purchased at a discount or premium, the greater will be the effect on an investor’s yield to maturity. As a result, the effect on an investor’s yield of principal payments distributed on an investor’s certificates occurring at a rate higher (or lower) than
549
the rate anticipated by the investor during any particular period would not be fully offset by a subsequent like reduction (or increase) in the rate of principal payments.
The yield on each of the classes of certificates that have a Pass-Through Rate equal to, limited by, or based on, the WAC Rate could (or in the case of any class of certificates with a Pass-Through Rate equal to, or based on, the WAC Rate, would) be adversely affected if Mortgage Loans with higher Mortgage Rates prepay faster than Mortgage Loans with lower Mortgage Rates. The Pass-Through Rates on these classes of certificates may be adversely affected by a decrease in the WAC Rate even if principal prepayments do not occur.
Losses and Shortfalls
The Certificate Balance or Notional Amount of any class of Offered Certificates may be reduced without distributions of principal as a result of the occurrence and allocation of Realized Losses, reducing the maximum amount distributable in respect of principal on the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates as well as the amount of interest that would have otherwise been payable on the Offered Certificates in the absence of such reduction. In general, a Realized Loss occurs when the principal balance of a Mortgage Loan is reduced without an equal distribution to applicable Certificateholders in reduction of the Certificate Balances of the certificates. Realized Losses may occur in connection with a default on a Mortgage Loan, acceptance of a discounted pay-off, the liquidation of the related Mortgaged Properties, a reduction in the principal balance of a Mortgage Loan by a bankruptcy court or pursuant to a modification, a recovery by the master servicer or trustee of a Nonrecoverable Advance on a Distribution Date or the incurrence of certain unanticipated or default-related costs and expenses (such as interest on Advances, Workout Fees, Liquidation Fees and Special Servicing Fees). Any reduction of the Certificate Balances of the classes of certificates indicated in the table below as a result of the application of Realized Losses will also reduce the Notional Amount of the related certificates.
Interest-Only |
Class Notional Amount |
Underlying Classes |
Class X-A | $ 731,617,000 | Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates |
Class X-B | $ 185,517,000 | Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates |
Certificateholders are not entitled to receive distributions of Periodic Payments when due except to the extent they are either covered by a P&I Advance or actually received. Consequently, any defaulted Periodic Payment for which no such P&I Advance is made will tend to extend the weighted average lives of the Offered Certificates, whether or not a permitted extension of the due date of the related Mortgage Loan has been completed.
Certain Relevant Factors Affecting Loan Payments and Defaults
The rate and timing of principal payments and defaults and the severity of losses on the Mortgage Loans may be affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation, the availability of credit for commercial or multifamily real estate, prevailing interest rates, the terms of the Mortgage Loans (e.g., due-on-sale clauses, lockout periods or Yield Maintenance Charges, release of property provisions, provisions relating to the application of earnout reserve funds, amortization terms that require balloon payments and incentives for a borrower to repay an ARD Loan by its Anticipated Repayment Date), the exercise of a purchase option by the holder of a mezzanine loan, the demographics and relative economic vitality of the areas in which the Mortgaged Properties are located and the general supply
550
and demand for rental properties in those areas, the quality of management of the Mortgaged Properties, the servicing of the Mortgage Loans, possible changes in tax laws and other opportunities for investment. See “Risk Factors” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool”.
The rate of prepayment on the pool of Mortgage Loans is likely to be affected by prevailing market interest rates for Mortgage Loans of a comparable type, term and risk level as the Mortgage Loans. When the prevailing market interest rate is below a mortgage interest rate, a borrower may have an increased incentive to refinance its Mortgage Loan. Although the Mortgage Loans contain provisions designed to mitigate the likelihood of an early loan repayment, we cannot assure you that the related borrowers will refrain from prepaying their Mortgage Loans due to the existence of these provisions, or that involuntary prepayments will not occur. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans”.
With respect to certain Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgage Loan documents allow for the sale of individual properties and the severance of the related debt and the assumption by the transferee of such portion of the Mortgage Loan as-is allocable to the individual property acquired by that transferee, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In addition, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgage Loan documents allow for partial releases of individual Mortgaged Properties during a lockout period or during such time as a Yield Maintenance Charge would otherwise be payable, which could result in a prepayment of a portion of the initial principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan without payment of a Yield Maintenance Charge or Prepayment Premium. Additionally, in the case of a partial release of an individual Mortgaged Property, the related release amount in many cases is greater than the allocated loan amount for the Mortgaged Property being released, which would result in a greater than proportionate paydown of the Mortgage Loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
Depending on prevailing market interest rates, the outlook for market interest rates and economic conditions generally, some borrowers may sell Mortgaged Properties in order to realize their equity in the Mortgaged Property, to meet cash flow needs or to make other investments. In addition, some borrowers may be motivated by federal and state tax laws (which are subject to change) to sell Mortgaged Properties prior to the exhaustion of tax depreciation benefits.
We make no representation as to the particular factors that will affect the rate and timing of prepayments and defaults on the Mortgage Loans, as to the relative importance of those factors, as to the percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loans that will be prepaid or as to which a default will have occurred as of any date or as to the overall rate of prepayment or default on the Mortgage Loans.
Delay in Payment of Distributions
Because each monthly distribution is made on each Distribution Date, which is at least 15 days after the end of the related Interest Accrual Period for the certificates, the effective yield to the holders of such certificates will be lower than the yield that would otherwise be produced by the applicable Pass-Through Rates and purchase prices (assuming the prices did not account for the delay).
551
Yield on the Certificates with Notional Amounts
The yield to maturity of the certificates with a Notional Amount will be highly sensitive to the rate and timing of reductions made to the Certificate Balances of the classes of certificates indicated in the table below, including by reason of prepayments and principal losses on the Mortgage Loans and other factors described above.
Interest-Only | Class Notional Amount | Underlying Classes | ||
Class X-A | $ 731,617,000 | Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3 and Class A-4 certificates | ||
Class X-B | $ 185,517,000 | Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates |
Any optional termination by the holders of the Controlling Class, the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates would result in prepayment in full of the Offered Certificates and would have an adverse effect on the yield of a class of the certificates with a Notional Amount because a termination would have an effect similar to a principal prepayment in full of the Mortgage Loans and, as a result, investors in these certificates and any other Offered Certificates purchased at premium might not fully recoup their initial investment. See “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination; Retirement of Certificates”.
Investors in the certificates with a Notional Amount should fully consider the associated risks, including the risk that an extremely rapid rate of prepayment or other liquidation of the Mortgage Loans could result in the failure of such investors to recoup fully their initial investments.
Weighted Average Life
The weighted average life of a Principal Balance Certificate refers to the average amount of time that will elapse from the date of its issuance until each dollar to be applied in reduction of the aggregate certificate balance of those certificates is paid to the related investor. The weighted average life of a Principal Balance Certificate will be influenced by, among other things, the rate at which principal on the Mortgage Loans is paid or otherwise received, which may be in the form of scheduled amortization, voluntary prepayments, Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds and Liquidation Proceeds. Distributions among the various classes of certificates will be made as set forth under “Description of the Certificates—Distributions—Priority of Distributions”.
Prepayments on Mortgage Loans may be measured by a prepayment standard or model. The “Constant Prepayment Rate” or “CPR” model represents an assumed constant annual rate of prepayment each month, expressed as a per annum percentage of the then-scheduled principal balance of the pool of Mortgage Loans. The “CPY” model represents an assumed CPR prepayment rate after any applicable lockout period, any applicable period in which defeasance is permitted and any applicable yield maintenance period. The depositor also may utilize the “CPP” model, which represents an assumed CPR prepayment rate after any applicable lockout period, any applicable period in which defeasance is permitted, any applicable yield maintenance period and after any fixed penalty period. The model used in this prospectus is the CPP model. As used in each of the following tables, the column headed “0% CPP” assumes that none of the Mortgage Loans is prepaid before its maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as the case may be. The columns headed “25% CPP”, “50% CPP”, “75% CPP” and “100% CPP” assume that prepayments on the Mortgage Loans are made at those levels of CPP. We cannot assure you, however, that prepayments of the Mortgage Loans will conform to any level of CPP,
552
and we make no representation that the Mortgage Loans will prepay at the levels of CPP shown or at any other prepayment rate.
The following tables indicate the percentage of the initial Certificate Balance of each class of the Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates that would be outstanding after each of the dates shown at various CPPs and the corresponding weighted average life of each such class of Offered Certificates. The tables have been prepared on the basis of the following assumptions (the “Structuring Assumptions”), among others:
● | except as otherwise set forth below, the Mortgage Loans have the characteristics set forth on Annex A-1 and the aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of the Mortgage Loans is as described in this prospectus; |
● | the initial aggregate certificate balance or notional amount, as the case may be, of each interest-bearing class of certificates is as described in this prospectus; |
● | the pass-through rate for each interest-bearing class of certificates is as described in this prospectus; |
● | no delinquencies, defaults or losses occur with respect to any of the Mortgage Loans; |
● | no additional trust fund expenses (including Operating Advisor Expenses) arise, no Servicing Advances are made under the PSA and the only expenses of the issuing entity consist of the Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fees, the Servicing Fees, the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fees, the Asset Representations Reviewer Fees and the Operating Advisor fees, each as set forth on Annex A-1; |
● | there are no modifications, extensions, waivers or amendments affecting the monthly debt service payments by borrowers on the Mortgage Loans; |
● | each of the Mortgage Loans provides for monthly debt service payments to be due on the first day of each month, regardless of the actual day of the month on which those payments are otherwise due and regardless of whether the subject date is a business day or not; |
● | all monthly debt service or balloon payments on the Mortgage Loans are timely received by the master servicer on behalf of the issuing entity on the day on which they are assumed to be due or paid as described in the immediately preceding bullet; |
● | each ARD Loan, if any, in the trust fund is paid in full on its Anticipated Repayment Date; |
● | no involuntary prepayments are received as to any Mortgage Loan at any time (including, without limitation, as a result of any application of escrows, reserve or holdback amounts if performance criteria are not satisfied); |
● | except as described in the next two succeeding bullets, no voluntary prepayments are received as to any Mortgage Loan during that Mortgage Loan’s prepayment lockout period, any period when defeasance is permitted, or during any period when principal prepayments on that Mortgage Loan are required to be accompanied by a Prepayment Premium or Yield Maintenance Charge; |
553
● | except as otherwise assumed in the immediately preceding two bullets, prepayments are made on each of the Mortgage Loans at the indicated CPPs set forth in the subject tables or other relevant part of this prospectus, without regard to any limitations in those Mortgage Loans on partial voluntary principal prepayments; |
● | all prepayments on the Mortgage Loans are assumed to be accompanied by a full month’s interest and no Prepayment Interest Shortfalls occur; |
● | no Yield Maintenance Charges or Prepayment Premiums are collected; |
● | no person or entity entitled thereto exercises its right of optional termination as described in this prospectus; |
● | no Mortgage Loan is required to be repurchased, and none of the holders of the Controlling Class (or any other Certificateholder), the special servicer, the master servicer or the holders of the Class R certificates will exercise its option to purchase all the Mortgage Loans and thereby cause an early termination of the issuing entity and no holder of any Subordinate Companion Loan, mezzanine debt or other indebtedness will exercise its option to purchase the related Mortgage Loan; |
● | distributions on the Offered Certificates are made on the 15th day of each month, commencing in March 2018; and |
● | the Offered Certificates are settled with investors on February 27, 2018. |
To the extent that the Mortgage Loans have characteristics that differ from those assumed in preparing the tables set forth below, a class of the Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates may mature earlier or later than indicated by the tables. The tables set forth below are for illustrative purposes only and it is highly unlikely that the Mortgage Loans will actually prepay at any constant rate until maturity or that all the Mortgage Loans will prepay at the same rate. In addition, variations in the actual prepayment experience and the balance of the Mortgage Loans that prepay may increase or decrease the percentages of initial Certificate Balances (and weighted average lives) shown in the following tables. These variations may occur even if the average prepayment experience of the Mortgage Loans were to equal any of the specified CPP percentages. Investors should not rely on the prepayment assumptions set forth in this prospectus and are urged to conduct their own analyses of the rates at which the Mortgage Loans may be expected to prepay, based on their own assumptions. Based on the foregoing assumptions, the following tables indicate the resulting weighted average lives of each class of Offered Certificates and set forth the percentage of the initial Certificate Balance of the class of the certificate that would be outstanding after each of the dates shown at the indicated CPPs.
554
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class A-1 Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 84% | 84% | 84% | 84% | 84% |
February 2020 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% |
February 2021 | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% |
February 2022 | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% |
February 2023 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 2.61 | 2.60 | 2.59 | 2.59 | 2.58 |
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class A-2 Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 4.89 | 4.87 | 4.85 | 4.82 | 4.60 |
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class A-SB Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2024 | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% |
February 2025 | 56% | 56% | 56% | 56% | 56% |
February 2026 | 32% | 32% | 32% | 32% | 32% |
February 2027 | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% |
February 2028 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 7.21 | 7.21 | 7.21 | 7.21 | 7.21 |
555
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class A-3 Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2024 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2028 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 9.81 | 9.77 | 9.73 | 9.66 | 9.48 |
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class A-4 Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2024 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2028 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 9.93 | 9.92 | 9.91 | 9.89 | 9.68 |
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class A-S Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2024 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2028 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.72 |
556
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class B Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below:
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2024 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2028 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.72 |
Percent
of the Initial Certificate Balance
of the Class C Certificates at the Respective CPPs
Set Forth Below
Distribution Date |
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP |
Closing Date | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2019 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2020 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2021 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2022 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2023 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2024 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2025 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2026 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2027 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
February 2028 and thereafter | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Weighted Average Life (years) | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.97 | 9.73 |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity Tables
The following tables indicate the approximate pre-tax yield to maturity on a corporate bond equivalent basis on the Offered Certificates for the specified CPPs based on the assumptions set forth under “—Weighted Average Life” above. It was further assumed that the purchase price of the Offered Certificates is as specified in the tables below, expressed as a percentage of the initial Certificate Balance or Notional Amount, as applicable, plus accrued interest from February 1, 2018 to the Closing Date.
The yields set forth in the following tables were calculated by determining the monthly discount rates that, when applied to the assumed streams of cash flows to be paid on the applicable class of Offered Certificates, would cause the discounted present value of such assumed stream of cash flows to equal the assumed purchase price of such class plus accrued interest, and by converting such monthly rates to semi-annual corporate bond equivalent rates. Such calculations do not take into account shortfalls in collection of
557
interest due to prepayments (or other liquidations) of the Mortgage Loans or the interest rates at which investors may be able to reinvest funds received by them as distributions on the applicable class of certificates (and, accordingly, do not purport to reflect the return on any investment in the applicable class of Offered Certificates when such reinvestment rates are considered).
The characteristics of the Mortgage Loans may differ from those assumed in preparing the tables below. In addition, we cannot assure you that the Mortgage Loans will prepay in accordance with the above assumptions at any of the rates shown in the tables or at any other particular rate, that the cash flows on the applicable class of Offered Certificates will correspond to the cash flows shown in this prospectus or that the aggregate purchase price of such class of Offered Certificates will be as assumed. In addition, it is unlikely that the Mortgage Loans will prepay in accordance with the above assumptions at any of the specified CPPs until maturity or that all the Mortgage Loans will so prepay at the same rate. Timing of changes in the rate of prepayments may significantly affect the actual yield to maturity to investors, even if the average rate of principal prepayments is consistent with the expectations of investors. Investors must make their own decisions as to the appropriate prepayment assumption to be used in deciding whether to purchase any class of Offered Certificates.
For purposes of this prospectus, prepayment assumptions with respect to the Mortgage Loans are presented in terms of the CPP model described under “—Weighted Average Life” above.
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class A-1 Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
98.99769% | 3.0396% | 3.0413% | 3.0424% | 3.0431% | 3.0437% |
99.24769% | 2.9373% | 2.9386% | 2.9394% | 2.9399% | 2.9403% |
99.49769% | 2.8355% | 2.8363% | 2.8367% | 2.8370% | 2.8373% |
99.74769% | 2.7340% | 2.7343% | 2.7345% | 2.7346% | 2.7347% |
99.99769% | 2.6329% | 2.6327% | 2.6326% | 2.6325% | 2.6324% |
100.24769% | 2.5322% | 2.5315% | 2.5311% | 2.5308% | 2.5306% |
100.49769% | 2.4318% | 2.4306% | 2.4300% | 2.4295% | 2.4291% |
100.74769% | 2.3318% | 2.3302% | 2.3292% | 2.3285% | 2.3280% |
100.99769% | 2.2322% | 2.2301% | 2.2288% | 2.2280% | 2.2272% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class A-2 Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
101.99603% | 3.2606% | 3.2595% | 3.2577% | 3.2549% | 3.2336% |
102.24603% | 3.2052% | 3.2039% | 3.2019% | 3.1988% | 3.1750% |
102.49603% | 3.1499% | 3.1485% | 3.1463% | 3.1428% | 3.1167% |
102.74603% | 3.0948% | 3.0933% | 3.0909% | 3.0870% | 3.0585% |
102.99603% | 3.0399% | 3.0382% | 3.0356% | 3.0314% | 3.0004% |
103.24603% | 2.9851% | 2.9833% | 2.9805% | 2.9760% | 2.9425% |
103.49603% | 2.9304% | 2.9285% | 2.9255% | 2.9207% | 2.8848% |
103.74603% | 2.8759% | 2.8739% | 2.8706% | 2.8655% | 2.8273% |
103.99603% | 2.8216% | 2.8194% | 2.8160% | 2.8105% | 2.7699% |
558
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class A-SB Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
101.99744% | 3.5898% | 3.5898% | 3.5898% | 3.5898% | 3.5898% |
102.24744% | 3.5503% | 3.5503% | 3.5503% | 3.5503% | 3.5503% |
102.49744% | 3.5108% | 3.5108% | 3.5108% | 3.5108% | 3.5108% |
102.74744% | 3.4715% | 3.4715% | 3.4715% | 3.4715% | 3.4715% |
102.99744% | 3.4323% | 3.4323% | 3.4323% | 3.4323% | 3.4323% |
103.24744% | 3.3932% | 3.3932% | 3.3932% | 3.3932% | 3.3932% |
103.49744% | 3.3542% | 3.3542% | 3.3542% | 3.3542% | 3.3542% |
103.74744% | 3.3153% | 3.3153% | 3.3153% | 3.3153% | 3.3153% |
103.99744% | 3.2765% | 3.2765% | 3.2765% | 3.2765% | 3.2765% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class A-3 Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
99.99715% | 3.7314% | 3.7313% | 3.7313% | 3.7312% | 3.7309% |
100.24715% | 3.7006% | 3.7004% | 3.7002% | 3.7000% | 3.6992% |
100.49715% | 3.6698% | 3.6696% | 3.6693% | 3.6688% | 3.6675% |
100.74715% | 3.6391% | 3.6388% | 3.6384% | 3.6378% | 3.6360% |
100.99715% | 3.6086% | 3.6082% | 3.6076% | 3.6068% | 3.6045% |
101.24715% | 3.5781% | 3.5776% | 3.5769% | 3.5760% | 3.5731% |
101.49715% | 3.5477% | 3.5471% | 3.5463% | 3.5452% | 3.5419% |
101.74715% | 3.5174% | 3.5167% | 3.5158% | 3.5145% | 3.5107% |
101.99715% | 3.4872% | 3.4864% | 3.4854% | 3.4839% | 3.4796% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class A-4 Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
101.99325% | 3.7528% | 3.7526% | 3.7523% | 3.7519% | 3.7472% |
102.24325% | 3.7226% | 3.7224% | 3.7221% | 3.7216% | 3.7164% |
102.49325% | 3.6925% | 3.6922% | 3.6919% | 3.6913% | 3.6856% |
102.74325% | 3.6624% | 3.6621% | 3.6618% | 3.6612% | 3.6549% |
102.99325% | 3.6325% | 3.6322% | 3.6318% | 3.6311% | 3.6243% |
103.24325% | 3.6026% | 3.6023% | 3.6018% | 3.6011% | 3.5938% |
103.49325% | 3.5728% | 3.5724% | 3.5720% | 3.5713% | 3.5634% |
103.74325% | 3.5431% | 3.5427% | 3.5422% | 3.5414% | 3.5330% |
103.99325% | 3.5135% | 3.5131% | 3.5126% | 3.5117% | 3.5028% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class X-A Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
6.43997% | 5.9422% | 5.8983% | 5.8421% | 5.7583% | 5.3725% |
6.53997% | 5.5725% | 5.5281% | 5.4713% | 5.3867% | 4.9971% |
6.63997% | 5.2113% | 5.1665% | 5.1091% | 5.0237% | 4.6304% |
6.73997% | 4.8584% | 4.8132% | 4.7552% | 4.6689% | 4.2721% |
6.83997% | 4.5134% | 4.4677% | 4.4092% | 4.3220% | 3.9217% |
6.93997% | 4.1760% | 4.1299% | 4.0708% | 3.9828% | 3.5791% |
7.03997% | 3.8459% | 3.7994% | 3.7397% | 3.6509% | 3.2438% |
7.13997% | 3.5228% | 3.4759% | 3.4157% | 3.3261% | 2.9156% |
7.23997% | 3.2064% | 3.1591% | 3.0985% | 3.0080% | 2.5942% |
559
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class X-B Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
2.16299% | 8.1820% | 8.1833% | 8.1845% | 8.1849% | 7.7378% |
2.26299% | 7.1239% | 7.1250% | 7.1259% | 7.1258% | 6.6619% |
2.36299% | 6.1344% | 6.1353% | 6.1359% | 6.1354% | 5.6555% |
2.46299% | 5.2059% | 5.2066% | 5.2069% | 5.2060% | 4.7108% |
2.56299% | 4.3320% | 4.3325% | 4.3325% | 4.3312% | 3.8215% |
2.66299% | 3.5071% | 3.5074% | 3.5072% | 3.5055% | 2.9818% |
2.76299% | 2.7264% | 2.7265% | 2.7261% | 2.7241% | 2.1871% |
2.86299% | 1.9859% | 1.9859% | 1.9852% | 1.9829% | 1.4331% |
2.96299% | 1.2820% | 1.2818% | 1.2809% | 1.2783% | 0.7161% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class A-S Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
101.99636% | 3.9851% | 3.9851% | 3.9851% | 3.9851% | 3.9795% |
102.24636% | 3.9546% | 3.9546% | 3.9546% | 3.9546% | 3.9484% |
102.49636% | 3.9242% | 3.9242% | 3.9242% | 3.9242% | 3.9174% |
102.74636% | 3.8939% | 3.8939% | 3.8939% | 3.8939% | 3.8865% |
102.99636% | 3.8637% | 3.8637% | 3.8637% | 3.8637% | 3.8557% |
103.24636% | 3.8336% | 3.8336% | 3.8336% | 3.8336% | 3.8249% |
103.49636% | 3.8036% | 3.8036% | 3.8036% | 3.8036% | 3.7943% |
103.74636% | 3.7736% | 3.7736% | 3.7736% | 3.7736% | 3.7637% |
103.99636% | 3.7438% | 3.7438% | 3.7438% | 3.7438% | 3.7332% |
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class B Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
101.99551% | 4.3372% | 4.3372% | 4.3372% | 4.3372% | 4.3316% |
102.24551% | 4.3062% | 4.3062% | 4.3062% | 4.3062% | 4.3000% |
102.49551% | 4.2753% | 4.2753% | 4.2753% | 4.2753% | 4.2685% |
102.74551% | 4.2445% | 4.2445% | 4.2445% | 4.2445% | 4.2370% |
102.99551% | 4.2137% | 4.2137% | 4.2137% | 4.2137% | 4.2056% |
103.24551% | 4.1831% | 4.1831% | 4.1831% | 4.1831% | 4.1744% |
103.49551% | 4.1525% | 4.1525% | 4.1525% | 4.1525% | 4.1432% |
103.74551% | 4.1221% | 4.1221% | 4.1221% | 4.1221% | 4.1121% |
103.99551% | 4.0917% | 4.0917% | 4.0917% | 4.0917% | 4.0811% |
560
Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity for the Class C Certificates
Assumed
Purchase Price |
Prepayment Assumption (CPP) | ||||
0% CPP |
25% CPP |
50% CPP |
75% CPP |
100% CPP | |
97.34710% | 5.1457% | 5.1457% | 5.1457% | 5.1457% | 5.1504% |
97.59710% | 5.1126% | 5.1126% | 5.1126% | 5.1126% | 5.1166% |
97.84710% | 5.0795% | 5.0795% | 5.0795% | 5.0795% | 5.0829% |
98.09710% | 5.0466% | 5.0466% | 5.0466% | 5.0466% | 5.0494% |
98.34710% | 5.0137% | 5.0137% | 5.0137% | 5.0137% | 5.0159% |
98.59710% | 4.9810% | 4.9810% | 4.9810% | 4.9810% | 4.9826% |
98.84710% | 4.9483% | 4.9484% | 4.9484% | 4.9483% | 4.9493% |
99.09710% | 4.9158% | 4.9158% | 4.9158% | 4.9158% | 4.9162% |
99.34710% | 4.8834% | 4.8834% | 4.8834% | 4.8834% | 4.8831% |
561
Material Federal Income Tax Considerations
General
The following is a general discussion of the anticipated material federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the certificates. The discussion below does not purport to address all federal income tax consequences that may be applicable to particular categories of investors (such as banks, insurance companies, securities dealers, foreign persons, investors whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, and investors that hold the certificates as part of a “straddle” or “conversion transaction”), some of which may be subject to special rules. The authorities on which this discussion is based are subject to change or differing interpretations, and any such change or interpretation could apply retroactively. This discussion reflects the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as well as regulations (the “REMIC Regulations”) promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS. Investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors in determining the federal, state, local or any other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the certificates.
Two separate real estate mortgage investment conduit (“REMIC”) elections will be made with respect to designated portions of the issuing entity (the “Lower-Tier REMIC” and the “Upper-Tier REMIC”, and, together, the “Trust REMICs”). The Lower-Tier REMIC will hold the Mortgage Loans (excluding Excess Interest) and certain other assets and will issue (i) certain classes of regular interests (the “Lower-Tier Regular Interests”) to the Upper-Tier REMIC and (ii) an uncertificated interest represented by the Class R certificates as the sole class of “residual interests” in the Lower-Tier REMIC.
The Upper-Tier REMIC will hold the Lower-Tier Regular Interests and will issue (i) the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class X-A, Class X-B, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class D-RR, Class E-RR, Class F-RR and Class NR-RR certificates (the “Regular Interests”), each representing a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC and (ii) an uncertificated interest represented by the Class R certificates as the sole class of “residual interests” in the Upper-Tier REMIC.
Qualification as a REMIC requires ongoing compliance with certain conditions. Assuming (i) the making of appropriate elections, (ii) compliance with the PSA and any Intercreditor Agreement, (iii) compliance with the provisions of any Non-Serviced PSA and any amendments thereto and the continued qualification of the REMICs formed under any Non-Serviced PSA and (iv) compliance with any changes in the law, including any amendments to the Code or applicable Treasury regulations thereunder, in the opinion of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, special tax counsel to the depositor, (a) each Trust REMIC will qualify as a REMIC on the Closing Date and thereafter, (b) each of the Lower-Tier Regular Interests will constitute a “regular interest” in the Lower-Tier REMIC, (c) each of the Regular Interests will constitute a “regular interest” in the Upper-Tier REMIC and (d) the Class R certificates will evidence the sole class of “residual interests” in each Trust REMIC.
In addition, in the opinion of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, special tax counsel to the depositor, the Excess Interest and the Excess Interest Distribution Account will be treated as a grantor trust (the “Grantor Trust”) for federal income tax purposes under subpart E, part I of subchapter J of the Code. Accordingly, the Class Z certificates will represent undivided beneficial interests in the Grantor Trust.
562
Qualification as a REMIC
In order for each Trust REMIC to qualify as a REMIC, there must be ongoing compliance on the part of such Trust REMIC with the requirements set forth in the Code. Each Trust REMIC must fulfill an asset test, which requires that no more than a de minimis portion of the assets of such Trust REMIC, as of the close of the third calendar month beginning after the Closing Date (which for purposes of this discussion is the date of the issuance of the Regular Interests, the “Startup Day”) and at all times thereafter, may consist of assets other than “qualified mortgages” and “permitted investments”. The REMIC Regulations provide a safe harbor pursuant to which the de minimis requirements will be met if at all times the aggregate adjusted basis of the nonqualified assets is less than 1% of the aggregate adjusted basis of all such Trust REMIC’s assets. Each Trust REMIC also must provide “reasonable arrangements” to prevent its residual interest from being held by “disqualified organizations” or their agents and must furnish applicable tax information to transferors or agents that violate this restriction. The PSA will provide that no legal or beneficial interest in the Class R certificates may be transferred or registered unless certain conditions, designed to prevent violation of this restriction, are met. Consequently, it is expected that each Trust REMIC will qualify as a REMIC at all times that any of its regular interests are outstanding.
A qualified mortgage is any obligation that is principally secured by an interest in real property and that is either transferred to a REMIC on the Startup Day or is purchased by a REMIC within a 3 month period thereafter pursuant to a fixed price contract in effect on the Startup Day. Qualified mortgages include (i) whole mortgage loans or split-note interests in such mortgage loans, such as the Mortgage Loans; provided that, in general, (a) the fair market value of the real property security (including buildings and structural components of the real property security) (reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property security that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on the real property security that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan) is at least 80% of the aggregate principal balance of such Mortgage Loan either at origination or as of the Startup Day (a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 125% with respect to the real property security) or (b) substantially all the proceeds of the Mortgage Loan were used to acquire, improve or protect an interest in real property that, at the date of origination, was the only security for the Mortgage Loan, and (ii) regular interests in another REMIC, such as the Lower-Tier Regular Interests that will be held by the Upper-Tier REMIC. If a Mortgage Loan was not in fact principally secured by real property or is otherwise not a qualified mortgage, it must be disposed of within 90 days of discovery of such defect, or otherwise ceases to be a qualified mortgage after such 90-day period.
Permitted investments include “cash flow investments”, “qualified reserve assets” and “foreclosure property”. A cash flow investment is an investment, earning a return in the nature of interest, of amounts received on or with respect to qualified mortgages for a temporary period, not exceeding 13 months, until the next scheduled distribution to holders of interests in the REMIC. A qualified reserve asset is any intangible property held for investment that is part of any reasonably required reserve maintained by the REMIC to provide for payments of expenses of the REMIC or amounts due on its regular or residual interests in the event of defaults (including delinquencies) on the qualified mortgages, lower than expected reinvestment returns, Prepayment Interest Shortfalls and certain other contingencies. The Trust REMICs will not hold any qualified reserve assets. Foreclosure property is real property acquired by a REMIC in connection with the default or imminent default of a qualified mortgage and maintained by the REMIC in compliance with applicable rules and personal property that is incidental to such real property; provided that the mortgage loan sellers had no knowledge or reason to know, as of the Startup Day, that such
563
a default had occurred or would occur. Foreclosure property may generally not be held after the close of the third calendar year beginning after the date the issuing entity acquires such property, with one extension that may be granted by the IRS.
A mortgage loan held by a REMIC will fail to be a qualified mortgage if it is “significantly modified” unless default is “reasonably foreseeable” or where the servicer believes there is a “significant risk of default” upon maturity of the mortgage loan or at an earlier date, and that by making such modification the risk of default is substantially reduced. A mortgage loan held by a REMIC will not be considered to have been “significantly modified” following the release of the lien on a portion of the real property collateral if (a) the release is pursuant to a defeasance permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents that occurs more than two years after the startup day of the REMIC or (b) following the release the loan-to-value ratio for the mortgage loan is not more than 125% with respect to the real property security. Furthermore, if the release is not pursuant to a defeasance and following the release the loan-to-value ratio for the mortgage loan is greater than 125%, the mortgage loan will continue to be a qualified mortgage if the release is part of a “qualified paydown transaction” in accordance with Revenue Procedure 2010-30.
In addition to the foregoing requirements, the various interests in a REMIC also must meet certain requirements. All of the interests in a REMIC must be either of the following: (i) one or more classes of regular interests or (ii) a single class of residual interests on which distributions, if any, are made pro rata. A regular interest is an interest in a REMIC that is issued on the Startup Day with fixed terms, is designated as a regular interest, and unconditionally entitles the holder to receive a specified principal amount (or other similar amount), and provides that interest payments (or other similar amounts), if any, at or before maturity either are payable based on a fixed rate or a qualified variable rate, or consist of a specified, nonvarying portion of the interest payments on the qualified mortgages. The rate on the specified portion may be a fixed rate, a variable rate, or the difference between one fixed or qualified variable rate and another fixed or qualified variable rate. The specified principal amount of a regular interest that provides for interest payments consisting of a specified, nonvarying portion of interest payments on qualified mortgages may be zero. An interest in a REMIC may be treated as a regular interest even if payments of principal with respect to such interest are subordinated to payments on other regular interests or the residual interest in the REMIC, and are dependent on the absence of defaults or delinquencies on qualified mortgages or permitted investments, lower than reasonably expected returns on permitted investments, expenses incurred by the REMIC or Prepayment Interest Shortfalls. A residual interest is an interest in a REMIC other than a regular interest that is issued on the Startup Day that is designated as a residual interest. Accordingly, each of the Lower-Tier Regular Interests will constitute a class of regular interests in the Lower-Tier REMIC, each class of the Regular Interests will constitute a class of regular interests in the Upper-Tier REMIC, and the Class R certificates will represent the sole class of residual interests in each Trust REMIC.
If an entity fails to comply with one or more of the ongoing requirements of the Code for status as a REMIC during any taxable year, the Code provides that the entity or applicable portion of it will not be treated as a REMIC for such year and thereafter. In this event, any entity with debt obligations with two or more maturities, such as the Trust REMICs, may be treated as a separate association taxable as a corporation under Treasury regulations, and the certificates may be treated as equity interests in such an association. The Code, however, authorizes the Treasury Department to issue regulations that address situations where failure to meet one or more of the requirements for REMIC status occurs inadvertently and in good faith. Investors should be aware, however, that the Conference Committee Report to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the “1986 Act”) indicates that the relief
564
may be accompanied by sanctions, such as the imposition of a corporate tax on all or a portion of a REMIC’s income for the period of time in which the requirements for REMIC status are not satisfied.
Status of Offered Certificates
Offered Certificates held by a real estate investment trust will constitute “real estate assets” within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(5)(B), and interest (including original issue discount) on the Offered Certificates will be considered “interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property” within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(3)(B) in the same proportion that, for both purposes, the assets of the issuing entity would be so treated. For purposes of Code Section 856(c)(5)(B), payments of principal and interest on the Mortgage Loans that are reinvested pending distribution to holders of Offered Certificates qualify for such treatment. Offered Certificates held by a domestic building and loan association will be treated as “loans . . . secured by an interest in real property which is . . . residential real property” within the meaning of Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C)(v) or as other assets described in Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C) only to the extent the Mortgage Loans are secured by residential real property. As of the Cut-off Date, thirteen (13) Mortgaged Properties representing 8.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, are multifamily properties. Holders of Offered Certificates should consult their tax advisors whether the foregoing percentage or some other percentage applies to their Offered Certificates. If at all times 95% or more of the assets of the issuing entity qualify for each of the foregoing treatments, the Offered Certificates will qualify for the corresponding status in their entirety. For the purposes of the foregoing determinations, the Trust REMICs will be treated as a single REMIC. In addition, Mortgage Loans that have been defeased with government securities will not qualify for such treatment. Offered Certificates will be “qualified mortgages” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3) for another REMIC if transferred to that REMIC within a prescribed time period in exchange for regular or residual interests in that REMIC. Moreover, Offered Certificates held by certain financial institutions will constitute an “evidence of indebtedness” within the meaning of Code Section 582(c)(1).
Taxation of Regular Interests
General
Each class of Regular Interests represents a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC. The Regular Interests will represent newly originated debt instruments for federal income tax purposes. In general, interest, original issue discount and market discount on a Regular Interest will be treated as ordinary income to the holder of a Regular Interest (a “Regular Interestholder”), and principal payments on a Regular Interest will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the Regular Interestholder’s basis in the Regular Interest. Regular Interestholders must use the accrual method of accounting with regard to the Regular Interests, regardless of the method of accounting otherwise used by such Regular Interestholders.
Notwithstanding the following, under new legislation enacted on December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”), for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 Regular Interestholders may be required to accrue amounts of market discount, Yield Maintenance Charges and other amounts no later than the year they included such amounts as revenue on their applicable financial statements. In addition, income from a debt instrument having original issue discount will be subject to this rule for tax years beginning after December 31, 2018. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax counsel regarding the potential application of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to their particular situation.
565
Original Issue Discount
Holders of Regular Interests issued with original issue discount generally must include original issue discount in ordinary income for federal income tax purposes as it accrues in accordance with the constant yield method, which takes into account the compounding of interest, in advance of receipt of the cash attributable to such income. The following discussion is based on temporary and final Treasury regulations (the “OID Regulations”) under Code Sections 1271 through 1273 and 1275 and in part on the provisions of the 1986 Act. Regular Interestholders should be aware, however, that the OID Regulations do not adequately address certain issues relevant to prepayable securities, such as the Regular Interests. To the extent such issues are not addressed in the OID Regulations, the certificate administrator will apply the methodology described in the Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act. No assurance can be provided that the IRS will not take a different position as to those matters not currently addressed by the OID Regulations. Moreover, the OID Regulations include an anti-abuse rule allowing the IRS to apply or depart from the OID Regulations if necessary or appropriate to ensure a reasonable tax result in light of the applicable statutory provisions. A tax result will not be considered unreasonable under the anti-abuse rule, however, in the absence of a substantial effect on the present value of a taxpayer’s tax liability. Investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the discussion in this prospectus and the appropriate method for reporting interest and original issue discount with respect to the Regular Interests.
Each Regular Interest will be treated as an installment obligation for purposes of determining the original issue discount includible in a Regular Interestholder’s income. The total amount of original issue discount on a Regular Interest is the excess of the “stated redemption price at maturity” of the Regular Interest over its “issue price”. The issue price of a class of Regular Interests is the first price at which a substantial amount of Regular Interests of such class is sold to investors (excluding bond houses, brokers and underwriters). Although unclear under the OID Regulations, the certificate administrator will treat the issue price of Regular Interests for which there is no substantial sale as of the issue date as the fair market value of such Regular Interests as of the issue date. The issue price of the Regular Interests also includes the amount paid by an initial Regular Interestholder for accrued interest that relates to a period prior to the issue date of such class of Regular Interests. The stated redemption price at maturity of a Regular Interest is the sum of all payments provided by the debt instrument other than any qualified stated interest payments. Under the OID Regulations, qualified stated interest generally means interest payable at a single fixed rate or a qualified variable rate; provided that such interest payments are unconditionally payable at intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the obligation. Because there is no penalty or default remedy in the case of nonpayment of interest with respect to a Regular Interest, it is possible that no interest on any class of Regular Interests will be treated as qualified stated interest. However, because the Mortgage Loans provide for remedies in the event of default, the certificate administrator will treat all payments of stated interest on the Regular Interests (other than the Class X Certificates) as qualified stated interest (other than accrued interest distributed on the first Distribution Date for the number of days that exceed the interval between the Closing Date and the first Distribution Date).
It is anticipated that the certificate administrator will treat the Class X-A and Class X-B certificates as having no qualified stated interest. Accordingly, such classes will be considered to be issued with original issue discount in an amount equal to the excess of all distributions of interest expected to be received on such classes over their respective issue prices (including interest accrued prior to the Closing Date). Any “negative” amounts of original issue discount on such classes attributable to rapid prepayments with respect to the
566
Mortgage Loans will not be deductible currently. The holder of a Class X-A or Class X-B certificate may be entitled to a deduction for a loss, which may be a capital loss, to the extent it becomes certain that such holder will not recover a portion of its basis in such class, assuming no further prepayments. In the alternative, it is possible that rules similar to the “noncontingent bond method” of the contingent interest rules of the OID Regulations may be promulgated with respect to such classes. Unless and until required otherwise by applicable authority, it is not anticipated that the contingent interest rules will apply.
Under a de minimis rule, original issue discount on a Regular Interest will be considered to be zero if such original issue discount is less than 0.25% of the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest multiplied by the weighted average maturity of the Regular Interest. For this purpose, the weighted average maturity of the Regular Interest is computed as the sum of the amounts determined by multiplying the number of full years (i.e., rounding down partial years) from the issue date until each distribution in reduction of stated redemption price at maturity is scheduled to be made by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of each distribution included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest and the denominator of which is the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest. The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that the schedule of such distributions should be determined in accordance with the assumed rate of prepayment on the Mortgage Loans used in pricing the transaction, i.e., 0% CPR; provided that it is assumed that any ARD Loan prepays on its anticipated repayment date (the “Prepayment Assumption”). See “Yield and Maturity Considerations—Weighted Average Life” above. Holders generally must report de minimis original issue discount pro rata as principal payments are received, and such income will be capital gain if the Regular Interest is held as a capital asset. Under the OID Regulations, however, Regular Interestholders may elect to accrue all de minimis original issue discount, as well as market discount and premium, under the constant yield method. See “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below. Based on the foregoing, it is anticipated that the Class C certificates will be issued with de minimis original issue discount for federal income tax purposes.
A holder of a Regular Interest issued with original issue discount generally must include in gross income for any taxable year the sum of the “daily portions”, as defined below, of the original issue discount on the Regular Interest accrued during an accrual period for each day on which it holds the Regular Interest, including the date of purchase but excluding the date of disposition. With respect to each such Regular Interest, a calculation will be made of the original issue discount that accrues during each successive full accrual period that ends on the day prior to each Distribution Date with respect to the Regular Interests, assuming that prepayments and extensions with respect to the Mortgage Loans will be made in accordance with the Prepayment Assumption. The original issue discount accruing in a full accrual period will be the excess, if any, of (i) the sum of (a) the present value of all of the remaining distributions to be made on the Regular Interest as of the end of that accrual period and (b) the distributions made on the Regular Interest during the accrual period that are included in the Regular Interest’s stated redemption price at maturity, over (ii) the adjusted issue price of the Regular Interest at the beginning of the accrual period. The present value of the remaining distributions referred to in the preceding sentence is calculated based on (i) the yield to maturity of the Regular Interest as of the Startup Day, (ii) events (including actual prepayments) that have occurred prior to the end of the accrual period and (iii) the assumption that the remaining payments will be made in accordance with the original Prepayment Assumption. For these purposes, the adjusted issue price of a Regular Interest at the beginning of any accrual period equals the issue price of the Regular Interest, increased by the aggregate amount of original issue discount with respect to the Regular Interest that accrued in all prior accrual periods and reduced by the amount of
567
distributions included in the Regular Interest’s stated redemption price at maturity that were made on the Regular Interest that were attributable to such prior periods. The original issue discount accruing during any accrual period (as determined in this paragraph) will then be divided by the number of days in the period to determine the daily portion of original issue discount for each day in the period.
Under the method described above, the daily portions of original issue discount required to be included as ordinary income by a Regular Interestholder (other than a holder of a Class X-A or Class X-B certificate) generally will increase to take into account prepayments on the Regular Interests as a result of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans that exceed the Prepayment Assumption, and generally will decrease (but not below zero for any period) if the prepayments are slower than the Prepayment Assumption. Due to the unique nature of interest-only certificates, the preceding sentence may not apply in the case of the Class X-A or Class X-B certificates.
Acquisition Premium
A purchaser of a Regular Interest at a price greater than its adjusted issue price and less than its remaining stated redemption price at maturity will be required to include in gross income the daily portions of the original issue discount on the Regular Interest reduced pro rata by a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of its purchase price over such adjusted issue price and the denominator of which is the excess of the remaining stated redemption price at maturity over the adjusted issue price. Alternatively, such a purchaser may elect to treat all such acquisition premium under the constant yield method, as described under the heading “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below.
Market Discount
A purchaser of a Regular Interest also may be subject to the market discount rules of Code Sections 1276 through 1278. Under these Code sections and the principles applied by the OID Regulations in the context of original issue discount, “market discount” is the amount by which the purchaser’s original basis in the Regular Interest (i) is exceeded by the remaining outstanding principal payments and non-qualified stated interest payments due on the Regular Interest, or (ii) in the case of a Regular Interest having original issue discount, is exceeded by the adjusted issue price of such Regular Interest at the time of purchase. Such purchaser generally will be required to recognize ordinary income to the extent of accrued market discount on such Regular Interest as distributions includible in its stated redemption price at maturity are received, in an amount not exceeding any such distribution. Such market discount would accrue in a manner to be provided in Treasury regulations and should take into account the Prepayment Assumption. The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that until such regulations are issued, such market discount would accrue, at the election of the holder, either (i) on the basis of a constant interest rate or (ii) in the ratio of interest accrued for the relevant period to the sum of the interest accrued for such period plus the remaining interest after the end of such period, or, in the case of classes issued with original issue discount, in the ratio of original issue discount accrued for the relevant period to the sum of the original issue discount accrued for such period plus the remaining original issue discount after the end of such period. Such purchaser also generally will be required to treat a portion of any gain on a sale or exchange of the Regular Interest as ordinary income to the extent of the market discount accrued to the date of disposition under one of the foregoing methods, less any accrued market discount previously reported as ordinary income as partial distributions in reduction of the stated redemption price at maturity were received. Such purchaser will be
568
required to defer deduction of a portion of the excess of the interest paid or accrued on indebtedness incurred to purchase or carry the Regular Interest over the interest (including original issue discount) distributable on the Regular Interest. The deferred portion of such interest expense in any taxable year generally will not exceed the accrued market discount on the Regular Interest for such year. Any such deferred interest expense is, in general, allowed as a deduction not later than the year in which the related market discount income is recognized or the Regular Interest is disposed of. As an alternative to the inclusion of market discount in income on the foregoing basis, the Regular Interestholder may elect to include market discount in income currently as it accrues on all market discount instruments acquired by such Regular Interestholder in that taxable year or thereafter, in which case the interest deferral rule will not apply. See “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below regarding making the election under Code Section 171 and an alternative manner in which such election may be deemed to be made.
Market discount with respect to a Regular Interest will be considered to be zero if such market discount is less than 0.25% of the remaining stated redemption price at maturity of such Regular Interest multiplied by the weighted average maturity of the Regular Interest remaining after the date of purchase. For this purpose, the weighted average maturity is determined by multiplying the number of full years (i.e., rounding down partial years) from the issue date until each distribution in reduction of stated redemption price at maturity is scheduled to be made by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of each such distribution included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest and the denominator of which is the total stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest. It appears that de minimis market discount would be reported pro rata as principal payments are received. Treasury regulations implementing the market discount rules have not yet been proposed, and investors should therefore consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules as well as the advisability of making any of the elections with respect to such rules. Investors should also consult Revenue Procedure 92-67 concerning the elections to include market discount in income currently and to accrue market discount on the basis of the constant yield method.
Premium
A Regular Interest purchased upon initial issuance or in the secondary market at a cost greater than its remaining stated redemption price at maturity generally is considered to be purchased at a premium. If the Regular Interestholder holds such Regular Interest as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Code Section 1221, the Regular Interestholder may elect under Code Section 171 to amortize such premium under the constant yield method. See “—Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method” below regarding making the election under Code Section 171 and an alternative manner in which the Code Section 171 election may be deemed to be made. Final Treasury regulations under Code Section 171 do not, by their terms, apply to prepayable obligations such as the Regular Interests. The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act indicates a Congressional intent that the same rules that will apply to the accrual of market discount on installment obligations will also apply to amortizing bond premium under Code Section 171 on installment obligations such as the Regular Interests, although it is unclear whether the alternatives to the constant interest method described above under “—Market Discount” are available. Amortizable bond premium will be treated as an offset to interest income on a Regular Interest rather than as a separate deduction item. It is anticipated that the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-SB, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-S and Class B certificates will be issued at a premium for federal income tax purposes.
569
Election To Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method
A holder of a debt instrument such as a Regular Interest may elect to treat all interest that accrues on the instrument using the constant yield method, with none of the interest being treated as qualified stated interest. For purposes of applying the constant yield method to a debt instrument subject to such an election, (i) “interest” includes stated interest, original issue discount, de minimis original issue discount, market discount and de minimis market discount, as adjusted by any amortizable bond premium or acquisition premium and (ii) the debt instrument is treated as if the instrument were issued on the holder’s acquisition date in the amount of the holder’s adjusted basis immediately after acquisition. It is unclear whether, for this purpose, the initial Prepayment Assumption would continue to apply or if a new prepayment assumption as of the date of the holder’s acquisition would apply. A holder generally may make such an election on an instrument by instrument basis or for a class or group of debt instruments. However, if the holder makes such an election with respect to a debt instrument with amortizable bond premium or with market discount, the holder is deemed to have made elections to amortize bond premium or to report market discount income currently as it accrues under the constant yield method, respectively, for all premium bonds held or acquired or market discount bonds acquired by the holder on the first day of the year of the election or thereafter. The election is made on the holder’s federal income tax return for the year in which the debt instrument is acquired and is irrevocable except with the approval of the IRS. Investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding the advisability of making such an election.
Treatment of Losses
Holders of the Regular Interests will be required to report income with respect to the Regular Interests on the accrual method of accounting, without giving effect to delays or reductions in distributions attributable to defaults or delinquencies on the Mortgage Loans, except to the extent it can be established that such losses are uncollectible. Accordingly, a Regular Interestholder may have income, or may incur a diminution in cash flow as a result of a default or delinquency, but may not be able to take a deduction (subject to the discussion below) for the corresponding loss until a subsequent taxable year. In this regard, investors are cautioned that while they generally may cease to accrue interest income if it reasonably appears that the interest will be uncollectible, the IRS may take the position that original issue discount must continue to be accrued in spite of its uncollectibility until the debt instrument is disposed of in a taxable transaction or becomes worthless in accordance with the rules of Code Section 166. The following discussion does not apply to holders of Class X Certificates. Under Code Section 166, it appears that the holders of Regular Interests that are corporations or that otherwise hold the Regular Interests in connection with a trade or business should in general be allowed to deduct as an ordinary loss any such loss sustained (and not previously deducted) during the taxable year on account of any such Regular Interests becoming wholly or partially worthless, and that, in general, the Regular Interestholders that are not corporations and do not hold the Regular Interests in connection with a trade or business will be allowed to deduct as a short term capital loss any loss with respect to principal sustained during the taxable year on account of such Regular Interests becoming wholly worthless. Although the matter is not free from doubt, such non-corporate holders of Regular Interests should be allowed a bad debt deduction at such time as the certificate balance of any class of such Regular Interests is reduced to reflect losses on the Mortgage Loans below such holder’s basis in the Regular Interests. The IRS, however, could take the position that non-corporate holders will be allowed a bad debt deduction to reflect such losses only after the classes of Regular Interests have been otherwise retired. The IRS could also assert that losses on a class of Regular Interests are deductible based on some other method that may defer such
570
deductions for all holders, such as reducing future cash flow for purposes of computing original issue discount. This may have the effect of creating “negative” original issue discount that, with the possible exception of the method discussed in the following sentence, would be deductible only against future positive original issue discount or otherwise upon termination of the applicable class. Although not free from doubt, a holder of Regular Interests with negative original issue discount may be entitled to deduct a loss to the extent that its remaining basis would exceed the maximum amount of future payments to which such holder was entitled, assuming no further prepayments. No bad debt losses will be allowed with respect to the Class X Certificates. Regular Interestholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the appropriate timing, amount and character of any loss sustained with respect to such Regular Interests. Special loss rules are applicable to banks and thrift institutions, including rules regarding reserves for bad debts. Such taxpayers are advised to consult their tax advisors regarding the treatment of losses on the Regular Interests.
Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums
Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums actually collected on the Mortgage Loans will be distributed as described in “Description of the Certificates—Allocation of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums”. It is not entirely clear under the Code when the amount of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums so allocated should be taxed to the holders of such classes of certificates, but it is not expected, for federal income tax reporting purposes, that Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums will be treated as giving rise to any income to the holder of such class of certificates prior to the certificate administrator’s actual receipt of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums. Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums, if any, may be treated as paid upon the retirement or partial retirement of such classes of certificates. The IRS may disagree with these positions. Certificateholders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the treatment of Yield Maintenance Charges and Prepayment Premiums.
Sale or Exchange of Regular Interests
If a Regular Interestholder sells or exchanges a Regular Interest, such Regular Interestholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the amount received and its adjusted basis in the Regular Interest. The adjusted basis of a Regular Interest generally will equal the cost of the Regular Interest to the seller, increased by any original issue discount, market discount or other amounts previously included in the seller’s gross income with respect to the Regular Interest and reduced by amounts included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the Regular Interest that were previously received by the seller, by any amortized premium, and by any deductible losses on the Regular Interest.
Except as described above with respect to market discount, and except as provided in this paragraph, any gain or loss on the sale or exchange of a Regular Interest realized by an investor that holds the Regular Interest as a capital asset will be capital gain or loss and will be long term or short term depending on whether the Regular Interest has been held for the long term capital gain holding period (more than one year). Such gain will be treated as ordinary income: (i) if the Regular Interest is held as part of a “conversion transaction” as defined in Code Section 1258(c), up to the amount of interest that would have accrued on the Regular Interestholder’s net investment in the conversion transaction at 120% of the appropriate applicable federal rate under Code Section 1274(d) in effect at the time the taxpayer entered into the transaction minus any amount previously treated as ordinary
571
income with respect to any prior disposition of property that was held as part of such transaction; (ii) in the case of a non-corporate taxpayer, to the extent such taxpayer has made an election under Code Section 163(d)(4) to have net capital gains taxed as investment income at ordinary income rates; or (iii) to the extent that such gain does not exceed the excess, if any, of (a) the amount that would have been includible in the gross income of the Regular Interestholder if his yield on such Regular Interest were 110% of the applicable federal rate as of the date of purchase, over (b) the amount of income actually includible in the gross income of such Regular Interestholder with respect to the Regular Interest. In addition, gain or loss recognized from the sale of a Regular Interest by certain banks or thrift institutions will be treated as ordinary income or loss pursuant to Code Section 582(c). Long-term capital gains of certain non-corporate taxpayers generally are subject to a lower maximum tax rate than ordinary income of such taxpayers for property held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate for corporations is the same with respect to both ordinary income and capital gains.
Taxes That May Be Imposed on a REMIC
Prohibited Transactions
Income from certain transactions by either Trust REMIC, called prohibited transactions, will not be part of the calculation of income or loss includible in the federal income tax returns of holders of the Class R certificates, but rather will be taxed directly to the Trust REMIC at a 100% rate. Prohibited transactions generally include (i) the disposition of a qualified mortgage other than for (a) substitution within two years of the Startup Day for a defective (including a defaulted) obligation (or repurchase in lieu of substitution of a defective (including a defaulted) obligation at any time) or for any qualified mortgage within 3 months of the Startup Day, (b) foreclosure, default or imminent default of a qualified mortgage, (c) bankruptcy or insolvency of the REMIC, or (d) a qualified (complete) liquidation, (ii) the receipt of income from assets that are not the type of mortgages or investments that the REMIC is permitted to hold, (iii) the receipt of compensation for services or (iv) the receipt of gain from disposition of cash flow investments other than pursuant to a qualified liquidation. Notwithstanding (i) and (iv), it is not a prohibited transaction to sell REMIC property to prevent a default on regular interests as a result of a default on qualified mortgages or to facilitate a qualified liquidation or a clean-up call. The REMIC Regulations indicate that the modification of a mortgage loan generally will not be treated as a disposition if it is occasioned by a default or reasonably foreseeable default, an assumption of a mortgage loan or the waiver of a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause. It is not anticipated that the Trust REMICs will engage in any prohibited transactions.
Contributions to a REMIC After the Startup Day
In general, a REMIC will be subject to a tax at a 100% rate on the value of any property contributed to the REMIC after the Startup Day. Exceptions are provided for cash contributions to the REMIC (i) during the 3 months following the Startup Day, (ii) made to a qualified reserve fund by a holder of a Class R certificate, (iii) in the nature of a guarantee, (iv) made to facilitate a qualified liquidation or clean-up call, and (v) as otherwise permitted in Treasury regulations yet to be issued. It is not anticipated that there will be any taxable contributions to the Trust REMICs.
572
Net Income from Foreclosure Property
The Lower-Tier REMIC will be subject to federal income tax at the corporate rate on “net income from foreclosure property”, determined by reference to the rules applicable to real estate investment trusts. Generally, property acquired by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure would be treated as “foreclosure property” until the close of the third calendar year beginning after the Lower-Tier REMIC’s acquisition of an REO Property, with a possible extension. Net income from foreclosure property generally means gain from the sale of a foreclosure property that is inventory property and gross income from foreclosure property other than qualifying rents and other qualifying income for a real estate investment trust.
In order for a foreclosed property to qualify as foreclosure property, any operation of the foreclosed property by the Lower-Tier REMIC generally must be conducted through an independent contractor. Further, such operation, even if conducted through an independent contractor, may give rise to “net income from foreclosure property”, taxable at the corporate rate. Payment of such tax by the Lower-Tier REMIC would reduce amounts available for distribution to Certificateholders.
The special servicer will be required to determine generally whether the operation of foreclosed property in a manner that would subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to such tax would be expected to result in higher after-tax proceeds than an alternative method of operating such property that would not subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to such tax.
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the “2015 Budget Act”), which was enacted on November 2, 2015, includes new audit rules affecting entities treated as partnerships, their partners and the persons that are authorized to represent entities treated as partnerships in IRS audits and related procedures. Under the 2015 Budget Act, these rules will also apply to REMICs, the holders of their residual interests and the trustees authorized to represent REMICs in IRS audits and related procedures (“tax matters persons” or “TMPs”).
In addition to other changes, under the 2015 Budget Act, (1) unless a REMIC elects otherwise, taxes arising from IRS audit adjustments are required to be paid by the REMIC rather than by its residual interest holders, (2) a REMIC appoints one person to act as its sole representative in connection with IRS audits and related procedures and that representative’s actions, including agreeing to adjustments to REMIC taxable income, will be binding on residual interest holders more so than a tax matters person’s actions under the rules that were in place for taxable years before 2018 and (3) if the IRS makes an adjustment to a REMIC’s taxable year, the holders of residual interests for the audited taxable year may have to take the adjustment into account for the taxable year in which the adjustment is made rather than for the audited taxable year.
The certificate administrator will have the authority to utilize, and will be directed to utilize, any exceptions available under the new provisions (including any changes) and IRS regulations so that holders of the Class R certificates, to the fullest extent possible, rather than either Trust REMIC itself, will be liable for any taxes arising from audit adjustments to either Trust REMIC’s taxable income. It is unclear how any such exceptions may affect the procedural rules available to challenge any audit adjustment that would otherwise be available in the absence of any such exceptions. Investors should discuss with their own tax advisors the possible effect of the new rules on them.
573
Taxation of Certain Foreign Investors
Interest, including original issue discount, distributable to the Regular Interestholders that are nonresident aliens, foreign corporations or other Non-U.S. Persons will be considered “portfolio interest” and, therefore, generally will not be subject to a 30% United States withholding tax; provided that such Non-U.S. Person (i) is not a “10 percent shareholder” within the meaning of Code Section 871(h)(3)(B) or a controlled foreign corporation described in Code Section 881(c)(3)(C) with respect to the Trust REMICs and (ii) provides the certificate administrator, or the person that would otherwise be required to withhold tax from such distributions under Code Section 1441 or 1442, with an appropriate statement, signed under penalties of perjury, identifying the beneficial owner and stating, among other things, that the beneficial owner of the Regular Interest is a Non-U.S. Person. The appropriate documentation includes IRS Form W-8BEN-E or W-8BEN, if the Non-U.S. Person is an entity (such as a corporation) or individual, respectively, eligible for the benefits of the portfolio interest exemption or an exemption based on a treaty; IRS Form W-8ECI if the Non-U.S. Person is eligible for an exemption on the basis of its income from the Regular Interest being effectively connected to a United States trade or business; IRS Form W-8BEN-E or W-8IMY if the Non-U.S. Person is a trust, depending on whether such trust is classified as the beneficial owner of the Regular Interest; and Form W-8IMY, with supporting documentation as specified in the Treasury regulations, required to substantiate exemptions from withholding on behalf of its partners, if the Non-U.S. Person is a partnership. With respect to IRS Forms W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8IMY and W-8ECI, each (other than IRS Form W-8IMY) expires after 3 full calendar years or as otherwise provided by applicable law. An intermediary (other than a partnership) must provide IRS Form W-8IMY, revealing all required information, including its name, address, taxpayer identification number, the country under the laws of which it is created, and certification that it is not acting for its own account. A “qualified intermediary” must certify that it has provided, or will provide, a withholding statement as required under Treasury regulations Section 1.1441-1(e)(5)(v), but need not disclose the identity of its account holders on its IRS Form W-8IMY, and may certify its account holders’ status without including each beneficial owner’s certification. A “non-qualified intermediary” must additionally certify that it has provided, or will provide, a withholding statement that is associated with the appropriate IRS Forms W-8 and W-9 required to substantiate exemptions from withholding on behalf of its beneficial owners. The term “intermediary” means a person acting as a custodian, a broker, nominee or otherwise as an agent for the beneficial owner of a Regular Interest. A “qualified intermediary” is generally a foreign financial institution or clearing organization or a non-U.S. branch or office of a U.S. financial institution or clearing organization that is a party to a withholding agreement with the IRS.
If such statement, or any other required statement, is not provided, 30% withholding will apply unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable tax treaty or unless the interest on the Regular Interest is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by such Non-U.S. Person. In the latter case, such Non-U.S. Person will be subject to United States federal income tax at regular rates. Investors that are Non-U.S. Persons should consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to them of owning a Regular Interest.
A “U.S. Person” is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation, partnership (except to the extent provided in the applicable Treasury regulations) or other entity created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any State or the District of Columbia, including any entity treated as a corporation or partnership for federal income tax purposes, an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of the source of income, or a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision
574
over the administration of such trust, and one or more such U.S. Persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of such trust (or, to the extent provided in the applicable Treasury regulations, certain trusts in existence on August 20, 1996 that have elected to be treated as U.S. Persons). The term “Non-U.S. Person” means a person other than a U.S. Person.
FATCA
Under the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” (“FATCA”) provisions of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, a 30% withholding tax is generally imposed on certain payments, including U.S.-source interest and, beginning on January 1, 2019, gross proceeds from the disposition of debt obligations that give rise to U.S.-source interest to “foreign financial institutions” and certain other foreign financial entities if those foreign entities fail to comply with the requirements of FATCA. The certificate administrator will be required to withhold amounts under FATCA on payments made to holders who are subject to the FATCA requirements and who fail to provide the certificate administrator with proof that they have complied with such requirements. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of FATCA to their certificates.
Backup Withholding
Distributions made on the certificates, and proceeds from the sale of the certificates to or through certain brokers, may be subject to a “backup” withholding tax under Code Section 3406 on “reportable payments” (including interest distributions, original issue discount and, under certain circumstances, principal distributions) unless the Certificateholder is a U.S. Person and provides IRS Form W-9 with the correct taxpayer identification number; in the case of the Regular Interests, is a Non-U.S. Person and provides IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable, identifying the Non-U.S. Person and stating that the beneficial owner is not a U.S. Person; or can be treated as an exempt recipient within the meaning of Treasury regulations Section 1.6049-4(c)(1)(ii). Any amounts to be withheld from distribution on the certificates would be refunded by the IRS or allowed as a credit against the Certificateholder’s federal income tax liability. Information reporting requirements may also apply regardless of whether withholding is required. Holders are urged to contact their own tax advisors regarding the application to them of backup withholding and information reporting.
Information Reporting
Holders who are individuals (and certain domestic entities that are formed or availed of for purposes of holding, directly or indirectly, “specified foreign financial assets”) may be subject to certain foreign financial asset reporting obligations with respect to their certificates held through a financial account maintained by a foreign financial institution if the aggregate value of their certificates and their other “specified foreign financial assets” exceeds $50,000. Significant penalties can apply if a holder fails to disclose its specified foreign financial assets. We urge you to consult your tax advisor with respect to this and other reporting obligations with respect to your certificates.
3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income”
Certain non-corporate U.S. holders will be subject to an additional 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income”, which may include the interest payments and any gain realized with respect to the certificates, to the extent of their net investment income that, when added to their other modified adjusted gross income, exceeds $200,000 for an unmarried individual, $250,000 for a married taxpayer filing a joint return (or a surviving
575
spouse), or $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return. The 3.8% Medicare tax is determined in a different manner than the regular income tax. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors with respect to their consequences with respect to the 3.8% Medicare tax.
Reporting Requirements
Each Trust REMIC will be required to maintain its books on a calendar year basis and to file federal income tax returns in a manner similar to a partnership. The form for such returns is IRS Form 1066, U.S. Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (REMIC) Income Tax Return. The trustee will be required to sign each Trust REMIC’s returns.
Reports of accrued interest, original issue discount, if any, and information necessary to compute the accrual of any market discount on the Regular Interests will be made annually to the IRS and to individuals, estates, non-exempt and non-charitable trusts, and partnerships that are either Regular Interestholders or beneficial owners that own Regular Interests through a broker or middleman as nominee. All brokers, nominees and all other nonexempt Regular Interestholders (including corporations, non-calendar year taxpayers, securities or commodities dealers, placement agents, real estate investment trusts, investment companies, common trusts, thrift institutions and charitable trusts) may request such information for any calendar quarter by telephone or in writing by contacting the person designated in IRS Publication 938 with respect to the REMIC. Holders through nominees must request such information from the nominee.
Treasury regulations require that, in addition to the foregoing requirements, information must be furnished annually to the Regular Interestholders and filed annually with the IRS concerning the percentage of each Trust REMIC’s assets meeting the qualified asset tests described under “—Qualification as a REMIC” above.
In addition, the Grantor Trust may be subject to Treasury regulations providing specific reporting rules for “widely-held fixed investment trusts”. Under these regulations, the certificate administrator will be required to file IRS Form 1099 (or any successor form) with the IRS with respect to holders of Class Z certificates who are not “exempt recipients” (a term that includes corporations, trusts, securities dealers, middlemen and certain other non-individuals) and do not hold such certificates through a middleman, to report the issuing entity’s gross income and, in certain circumstances, unless the certificate administrator reports under the safe harbor as described in the last sentence of this paragraph, if any assets of the issuing entity were disposed of or certificates are sold in secondary market sales, the portion of the gross proceeds relating to the assets of the issuing entity that are attributable to such holder. The same requirements would be imposed on middlemen holding such certificates on behalf of the related holders. Under certain circumstances, the certificate administrator may report under the safe harbor for widely-held mortgage trusts, as such term is defined under Treasury regulations Section 1.671-5.
These regulations also require that the certificate administrator make available information regarding interest income and information necessary to compute any original issue discount to (i) exempt recipients (including middlemen) and non-calendar year taxpayers, upon request, in accordance with the requirements of the regulations and (ii) Certificateholders who do not hold their certificates through a middleman. The information must be provided to parties specified in clause (i) on or before the later of the 30th day after the close of the calendar year to which the request relates and 14 days after the receipt of the request. The information must be provided to parties specified in clause (ii) on or before March 15 of the calendar year for which the statement is being furnished.
576
DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THESE RULES AND THE CURRENT UNCERTAINTY AS TO THE MANNER OF THEIR APPLICATION TO THE ISSUING ENTITY AND CERTIFICATEHOLDERS, IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT POTENTIAL INVESTORS CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX TREATMENT OF THEIR ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF THE CERTIFICATES.
Certain State and Local Tax Considerations
In addition to the federal income tax consequences described in “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations” above, purchasers of Offered Certificates should consider the state and local income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Offered Certificates. State and local income tax law may differ substantially from the corresponding federal law, and this discussion does not purport to describe any aspect of the income tax laws of any state or locality.
It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may attempt to tax nonresident holders of offered certificates solely by reason of the location in that jurisdiction of the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the sponsors, a related borrower or a mortgaged property or on some other basis, may require nonresident holders of certificates to file returns in such jurisdiction or may attempt to impose penalties for failure to file such returns; and it is possible that any such jurisdiction will ultimately succeed in collecting such taxes or penalties from nonresident holders of offered certificates. We cannot assure you that holders of offered certificates will not be subject to tax in any particular state, local or other taxing jurisdiction.
You should consult with your tax advisor with respect to the various state and local, and any other, tax consequences of an investment in the Offered Certificates.
Method of Distribution (Underwriter)
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”), among the depositor and the underwriters, the depositor has agreed to sell to the underwriters, and the underwriters have severally, but not jointly, agreed to purchase from the depositor the respective Certificate Balance or the Notional Amount, as applicable, of each class of Offered Certificates set forth below subject in each case to a variance of 5% (the sum of any column of the below table may not equal the indicated total due to rounding).
577
Underwriter | Class A-1 | Class A-2 | Class A-SB | Class A-3 | ||||||||||||
UBS Securities LLC | $ | 23,131,000 | $ | 68,276,000 | $ | 35,465,000 | $ | 284,000,000 | ||||||||
SG Americas Securities, LLC | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Barclays Capital Inc. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
CIBC World Markets Corp. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Drexel Hamilton, LLC | $ | 100,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Academy Securities, Inc. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 23,231,000 | $ | 68,276,000 | $ | 35,465,000 | $ | 284,000,000 | ||||||||
Underwriter | Class A-4 | Class X-A | Class X-B | Class A-S | ||||||||||||
UBS Securities LLC | $ | 289,645,000 | $ | 731,617,000 | $ | 185,517,000 | $ | 84,920,000 | ||||||||
SG Americas Securities, LLC | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Barclays Capital Inc. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. | $ | 30,000,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
CIBC World Markets Corp. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Drexel Hamilton, LLC | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Academy Securities, Inc. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 320,645,000 | $ | 731,617,000 | $ | 185,517,000 | $ | 84,920,000 | ||||||||
Underwriter | Class B | Class C | ||||||||||||||
UBS Securities LLC | $ | 54,871,000 | $ | 45,726,000 | ||||||||||||
SG Americas Securities, LLC | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Barclays Capital Inc. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
CIBC World Markets Corp. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Drexel Hamilton, LLC | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Academy Securities, Inc. | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 54,871,000 | $ | 45,726,000 |
The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters will be subject to certain conditions precedent and that the underwriters will be obligated to purchase all Offered Certificates if any are purchased. In the event of a default by any underwriter, the Underwriting Agreement provides that, in certain circumstances, purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriter(s) may be increased or the Underwriting Agreement may be terminated.
Additionally, the parties to the PSA have severally agreed to indemnify the underwriters, and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify the depositor and controlling persons of the depositor, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and have agreed, if required, to contribute to payments required to be made in respect of these liabilities.
The depositor has been advised by the underwriters that they propose to offer the Offered Certificates to the public from time to time in one or more negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at varying prices to be determined at the time of sale. Proceeds to the depositor from the sale of Offered Certificates will be approximately 108.0% of the initial aggregate Certificate Balance of the Offered Certificates, plus accrued interest on the Offered Certificates from February 1, 2018, before deducting expenses payable by the depositor (estimated at $6,981,828, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions). The underwriters may affect the transactions by selling the Offered Certificates to or through dealers, and the dealers may receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters. In connection with the purchase and sale of the Offered Certificates offered by this prospectus, the underwriters may be deemed to have received compensation from the depositor in the form of underwriting discounts.
We anticipate that the Offered Certificates will be sold primarily to institutional investors. Purchasers of Offered Certificates, including dealers, may, depending on the facts and
578
circumstances of those purchases, be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with reoffers and resales by them of Offered Certificates. If you purchase Offered Certificates, you should consult with your legal advisors in this regard prior to any reoffer or resale. The underwriters expect to make, but are not obligated to make, a secondary market in the Offered Certificates. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline”.
The primary source of ongoing information available to investors concerning the Offered Certificates will be the monthly statements discussed under “Description of the Certificates—Reports to Certificateholders; Certain Available Information”. We cannot assure you that any additional information regarding the Offered Certificates will be available through any other source. In addition, we are not aware of any source through which price information about the Offered Certificates will be generally available on an ongoing basis. The limited nature of that information regarding the Offered Certificates may adversely affect the liquidity of the Offered Certificates, even if a secondary market for the Offered Certificates becomes available.
UBS Securities LLC, one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of UBS AG, New York Branch, which is a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller, an affiliate of the depositor and the holder of certain of the AFIN Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans and the Park Place at Florham Park Pari Passu Companion Loans. SG Americas Securities, LLC, one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Société Générale, which is a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller and the holder of certain of the AFIN Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans. Barclays Capital Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Barclays, which is a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller and the holder of certain of the Houston Distribution Center Pari Passu Companion Loans. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., one of the underwriters., is an affiliate of CCRE Lending, which is a sponsor, an originator, a mortgage loan seller and the holder of certain of the CrossPoint Pari Passu Companion Loans, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC, a primary servicer. CIBC, a mortgage loan seller, a sponsor and an originator, is an affiliate of CIBC World Markets Corp., one of the underwriters.
A portion of the net proceeds of this offering (after the payment of underwriting compensation and transaction expenses) is intended to be directed to affiliates of UBS Securities LLC, which is one of the underwriters, a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner for this offering, affiliates of SG Americas Securities, LLC, which is one of the underwriters and a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner for this offering, affiliates of Barclays Capital Inc., which is one of the underwriters and a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner for this offering, affiliates of Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., which is one of the underwriters and a co-lead manager and joint bookrunner for this offering, and affiliates of CIBC World Markets Corp., which is one of the underwriters and a co-manager for this offering. That direction will occur by means of the collective effect of the payment by the underwriters to the depositor, an affiliate of UBS Securities LLC, of the purchase price for the Offered Certificates and the following payments:
(1) | the payment by the depositor to UBS AG, New York Branch, an affiliate of UBS Securities LLC, in that affiliate’s capacity as a mortgage loan seller, of the purchase price for the Mortgage Loans to be sold to the depositor by UBS AG, New York Branch; |
(2) | the payment by the depositor to Barclays, an affiliate of Barclays Capital Inc., in that affiliate’s capacity as a mortgage loan seller, of the purchase price for the Mortgage Loans to be sold to the depositor by Barclays; |
579
(3) | the payment by the depositor to Société Générale, an affiliate of SG Americas Securities, LLC, in that affiliate’s capacity as a mortgage loan seller, of the purchase price for the Mortgage Loans to be sold to the depositor by Société Générale; |
(4) | the payment by the depositor to CCRE Lending, an affiliate of Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., in that affiliate’s capacity as a mortgage loan seller, of the purchase price for the Mortgage Loans to be sold to the depositor by CCRE Lending; and |
(5) | the payment by the depositor to CIBC, an affiliate of CIBC World Markets Corp., in that affiliate’s capacity as a mortgage loan seller, of the purchase price for the Mortgage Loans to be sold to the depositor by CIBC. |
As a result of the circumstances described above in this paragraph and the prior paragraph, each of UBS Securities LLC, SG Americas Securities, LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and CIBC World Markets Corp. have a “conflict of interest” within the meaning of Rule 5121 of the consolidated rules of The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. In addition, other circumstances exist that result in the underwriters or their affiliates having conflicts of interest, notwithstanding that such circumstances may not constitute a “conflict of interest” within the meaning of such Rule 5121. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned With Your Interests” and “Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties”.
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
(a) | it has not offered, sold or otherwise made available and will not offer, sell or otherwise make available any Offered Certificates to any retail investor in the European Economic Area. For the purposes of this provision: |
(i) | the expression “retail investor” means a person who is one (or more) of the following: |
(A) | a retail client as defined in point (11) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU (as amended, “MiFID II” ); or |
(B) | a customer within the meaning of Directive 2002/92/EC, where that customer would not qualify as a professional client as defined in point (10) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II; or |
(C) | not a qualified investor as defined in Directive 2003/71/EC (as amended, the “Prospectus Directive”); and |
(ii) | the expression “offer” includes the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the Offered Certificates to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the Offered Certificates; |
(b) | it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of the Offered Certificates in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the issuing entity or the depositor; and |
580
(c) | it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the Offered Certificates in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom. |
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference
All reports filed or caused to be filed by the depositor with respect to the issuing entity before the termination of this offering pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that relate to the Offered Certificates (other than Annual Reports on Form 10-K) will be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus, except that if a Non-Serviced PSA is entered into after termination of this offering, any Current Report on Form 8-K filed after termination of this offering that includes as an exhibit such Non-Serviced PSA will be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
In addition, the following disclosures filed by the depositor on or prior to the date of the filing of this prospectus are hereby incorporated by reference into this prospectus: the disclosures with respect to the mortgage loans filed as exhibits to Form ABS-EE in accordance with Items 601(b)(102) and Item 601(b)(103) of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. §§601(b)(102) and 601(b)(103)).
The depositor will provide or cause to be provided without charge to each person to whom this prospectus is delivered in connection with this offering (including beneficial owners of the Offered Certificates), upon written or oral request of that person, a copy of any or all documents or reports incorporated in this prospectus by reference, in each case to the extent the documents or reports relate to the Offered Certificates, other than the exhibits to those documents (unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in those documents). Requests to the depositor should be directed in writing to its principal executive offices at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10019, Attention: President, or by telephone at (212) 713-2000.
Where You Can Find More Information
The depositor has filed a Registration Statement on Form SF-3 (SEC File No. 333-207340) (the “Registration Statement”) relating to multiple series of CMBS, including the Offered Certificates, with the SEC. This prospectus will form a part of the Registration Statement, but the Registration Statement includes additional information. Copies of the Registration Statement and other materials filed with or furnished to the SEC, including Distribution Reports on Form 10-D, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Forms ABS-15G, and any amendments to these reports may be read and copied at the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet site at “http://www.sec.gov” at which you can view and download copies of reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed or furnished electronically through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system. The SEC maintains computer terminals providing access to the EDGAR system at each of the offices referred to above.
The depositor has met the registrant requirements of Section I.A.1. of the General Instructions to the Registration Statement.
581
Copies of all reports of the issuing entity on Forms ABS-EE, 10-D, 10-K and 8-K will also be made available on the website of the certificate administrator as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC through the EDGAR system.
Financial Information
The issuing entity will be newly formed and will not have engaged in any business activities or have any assets or obligations prior to the issuance of the Offered Certificates. Accordingly, no financial statements with respect to the issuing entity are included in this prospectus.
The depositor has determined that its financial statements will not be material to the offering of the Offered Certificates.
Certain ERISA Considerations
General
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA, and Code Section 4975 impose certain requirements on retirement plans, and on certain other employee benefit plans and arrangements, including individual retirement accounts and annuities, Keogh plans, collective investment funds, insurance company separate accounts and some insurance company general accounts in which those plans, accounts or arrangements are invested that are subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA or Code Section 4975 (all of which are referred to as “Plans”), and on persons who are fiduciaries with respect to Plans, in connection with the investment of Plan assets. Certain employee benefit plans, such as governmental plans (as defined in ERISA Section 3(32)), and, if no election has been made under Code Section 410(d), church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA) are not subject to ERISA requirements. However, those plans may be subject to the provisions of other applicable federal, state or local law (“Similar Law”) materially similar to the foregoing provisions of ERISA or the Code. Moreover, those plans, if qualified and exempt from taxation under Code Sections 401(a) and 501(a), are subject to the prohibited transaction rules set forth in Code Section 503.
ERISA generally imposes on Plan fiduciaries certain general fiduciary requirements, including those of investment prudence and diversification and the requirement that a Plan’s investments be made in accordance with the documents governing the Plan. In addition, ERISA and the Code prohibit a broad range of transactions involving assets of a Plan and persons (“Parties in Interest”) who have certain specified relationships to the Plan, unless a statutory, regulatory or administrative exemption is available. Certain Parties in Interest that participate in a prohibited transaction may be subject to an excise tax imposed pursuant to Code Section 4975, unless a statutory, regulatory or administrative exemption is available. These prohibited transactions generally are set forth in Section 406 of ERISA and Code Section 4975. Special caution should be exercised before the assets of a Plan are used to purchase an Offered Certificate if, with respect to those assets, the depositor, any servicer or the trustee or any of their affiliates, either: (a) has investment discretion with respect to the investment of those assets of that Plan; or (b) has authority or responsibility to give, or regularly gives, investment advice with respect to those assets for a fee and pursuant to an agreement or understanding that the advice will serve as a primary basis for investment decisions with respect to those assets and that the advice will be based on the particular investment needs of the Plan; or (c) is an employer maintaining or contributing to the Plan.
582
Before purchasing any Offered Certificates with Plan assets, a Plan fiduciary should consult with its counsel and determine whether there exists any prohibition to that purchase under the requirements of ERISA or Code Section 4975, whether any prohibited transaction class exemption or any individual administrative prohibited transaction exemption (as described below) applies, including whether the appropriate conditions set forth in those exemptions would be met, or whether any statutory prohibited transaction exemption is applicable. Fiduciaries of plans subject to a Similar Law should consider the need for, and the availability of, an exemption under such applicable Similar Law.
Plan Asset Regulations
A Plan’s investment in Offered Certificates may cause the assets of the issuing entity to be deemed Plan assets. Section 2510.3-101 of the regulations of the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”), as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA, provides that when a Plan acquires an equity interest in an entity, the Plan’s assets include both the equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless certain exceptions not applicable to this discussion apply, or unless the equity participation in the entity by “benefit plan investors” (that is, Plans and entities whose underlying assets include plan assets) is not “significant”. For this purpose, in general, equity participation in an entity will be “significant” on any date if, immediately after the most recent acquisition of any certificate, 25% or more of any class of certificates is held by benefit plan investors.
In general, any person who has discretionary authority or control respecting the management or disposition of Plan assets, and any person who provides investment advice with respect to those assets for a fee, is a fiduciary of the investing Plan. If the assets of the issuing entity constitute Plan assets, then any party exercising management or discretionary control regarding those assets, such as the master servicer, the special servicer or any sub-servicer, may be deemed to be a Plan “fiduciary” with respect to the investing Plan, and thus subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Code Section 4975. In addition, if the assets of the issuing entity constitute Plan assets, the purchase of Offered Certificates by a Plan, as well as the operation of the issuing entity, may constitute or involve a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code.
Administrative Exemptions
The U.S. Department of Labor has issued to the predecessor of UBS Securities LLC, Prohibited Transaction Exemption (“PTE”) 91-22, 56 Fed. Reg. 15933 (April 18, 1991), as amended by PTE 2013-08, 78 Fed. Reg. 41090 (July 9, 2013) (the “Exemption”). The Exemption generally exempts from the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of Sections 406 and 407 of ERISA, and the excise taxes imposed on prohibited transactions pursuant to Code Sections 4975(a) and (b), certain transactions, among others, relating to the servicing and operation of pools of mortgage loans, such as the pool of mortgage loans held by the issuing entity, and the purchase, sale and holding of mortgage pass-through certificates, such as the Offered Certificates, underwritten by UBS Securities LLC, provided that certain conditions set forth in the Exemption are satisfied. The depositor expects that the Exemption generally will apply to the Offered Certificates.
The Exemption sets forth 5 general conditions that must be satisfied for a transaction involving the purchase, sale and holding of the Offered Certificates to be eligible for exemptive relief. First, the acquisition of the Offered Certificates by a Plan must be on terms (including the price paid for the Offered Certificates) that are at least as favorable to the Plan as they would be in an arm’s-length transaction with an unrelated party. Second, the Offered Certificates at the time of acquisition by the Plan must be rated in one of the
583
four highest generic rating categories by at least one NRSRO that meets the requirements of the Exemption (an “Exemption Rating Agency”). Third, the trustee cannot be an affiliate of any other member of the Restricted Group other than an underwriter. The “Restricted Group” consists of any underwriter, the depositor, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, any sub-servicer, any entity that provides insurance or other credit support to the issuing entity and any borrower with respect to mortgage loans constituting more than 5% of the aggregate unamortized principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates, and any affiliate of any of the foregoing entities. Fourth, the sum of all payments made to and retained by the underwriters must represent not more than reasonable compensation for underwriting the Offered Certificates, the sum of all payments made to and retained by the depositor pursuant to the assignment of the mortgage loans to the issuing entity must represent not more than the fair market value of the mortgage loans and the sum of all payments made to and retained by the master servicer, the special servicer and any sub-servicer must represent not more than reasonable compensation for that person’s services under the PSA and reimbursement of the person’s reasonable expenses in connection therewith. Fifth, the investing Plan must be an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a)(1) of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
It is a condition of the issuance of the Offered Certificates that they have the ratings described above required by the Exemption and the depositor believes that each of the Rating Agencies qualifies as an Exemption Rating Agency. Consequently, the second general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates as of the Closing Date. As of the Closing Date, the third general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates. In addition, the depositor believes that the fourth general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates. A fiduciary of a Plan contemplating purchasing an Offered Certificate in the secondary market must make its own determination that, at the time of purchase, the Offered Certificates continue to satisfy the second general condition set forth above. A fiduciary of a Plan contemplating purchasing an Offered Certificate, whether in the initial issuance of the Offered Certificates or in the secondary market, must make its own determination that the first and fifth general conditions set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the related Offered Certificate.
The Exemption also requires that the issuing entity meet the following requirements: (1) the issuing entity must consist solely of assets of the type that have been included in other investment pools; (2) certificates in those other investment pools must have been rated in one of the four highest categories by at least one of the Exemption Rating Agencies for at least one year prior to the Plan’s acquisition of Offered Certificates; and (3) certificates in those other investment pools must have been purchased by investors other than Plans for at least one year prior to any Plan’s acquisition of Offered Certificates.
The depositor believes that the conditions to the applicability of the Exemption will generally be met with respect to the Offered Certificates, other than those conditions which are dependent on facts unknown to the depositor or which it cannot control, such as those relating to the circumstances of the Plan purchaser or the Plan fiduciary making the decision to purchase any such Offered Certificates.
If the general conditions of the Exemption are satisfied, the Exemption may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a) and 407(a) of ERISA (as well as the excise taxes imposed by Code Sections 4975(a) and (b) by reason of Code Sections 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D)) in connection with (1) the direct or indirect sale, exchange or transfer of Offered Certificates in the initial issuance of certificates between the depositor or the underwriters and a Plan when the depositor, any of the underwriters, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, a sub-servicer or a borrower is a party in
584
interest with respect to the investing Plan, (2) the direct or indirect acquisition or disposition in the secondary market of the Offered Certificates by a Plan and (3) the holding of Offered Certificates by a Plan. However, no exemption is provided from the restrictions of Sections 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2) and 407 of ERISA for the acquisition or holding of an Offered Certificate on behalf of an “Excluded Plan” by any person who has discretionary authority or renders investment advice with respect to the assets of the Excluded Plan. For purposes of this prospectus, an “Excluded Plan” is a Plan sponsored by any member of the Restricted Group.
If certain specific conditions of the Exemption are also satisfied, the Exemption may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of ERISA and the taxes imposed by Code Section 4975(c)(1)(E) in connection with (1) the direct or indirect sale, exchange or transfer of Offered Certificates in the initial issuance of certificates between the depositor or the underwriters and a Plan when the person who has discretionary authority or renders investment advice with respect to the investment of Plan assets in those certificates is (a) a borrower with respect to 5% or less of the fair market value of the mortgage loans or (b) an affiliate of that person, (2) the direct or indirect acquisition or disposition in the secondary market of Offered Certificates by a Plan and (3) the holding of Offered Certificates by a Plan.
Further, if certain specific conditions of the Exemption are satisfied, the Exemption may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a), 406(b) and 407(a) of ERISA, and the taxes imposed by Code Sections 4975(a) and (b) by reason of Code Section 4975(c) for transactions in connection with the servicing, management and operation of the pool of mortgage loans.
A fiduciary of a Plan should consult with its counsel with respect to the applicability of the Exemption. The fiduciary of a plan not subject to ERISA or Code Section 4975, such as a governmental plan, should determine the need for and availability of exemptive relief under applicable Similar Law. A purchaser of an Offered Certificate should be aware, however, that even if the conditions specified in one or more exemptions are satisfied, the scope of relief provided by an exemption may not cover all acts which might be construed as prohibited transactions.
In addition, each beneficial owner of an Offered Certificate or any interest therein that is a Plan, including any fiduciary purchasing Offered Certificates on behalf of a Plan (“Plan Fiduciary”), will be deemed to have represented by its acquisition of such Offered Certificates that:
(1) none of the depositor, any of the underwriters, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor, the asset representations reviewer, the master servicer, the special servicer, or any of their respective affiliated entities (the “Transaction Parties”), has provided or will provide advice with respect to the acquisition of Offered Certificates by the Plan, other than to the Plan Fiduciary which is independent of the Transaction Parties, and the Plan Fiduciary either: (a) is a bank as defined in Section 202 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), or similar institution that is regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a State or Federal agency; (b) is an insurance carrier which is qualified under the laws of more than one state to perform the services of managing, acquiring or disposing of assets of a Plan; (c) is an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, or, if not registered an as investment adviser under the Advisers Act by reason of paragraph (1) of Section 203A of the Advisers Act, is registered as an investment adviser under the laws of the state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business; (d) is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; or (e) has, and at all times that the Plan is
585
invested in the Offered Certificates will have, total assets of at least U.S. $50,000,000 under its management or control (provided that this clause (e) shall not be satisfied if the Plan Fiduciary is either (i) the owner or a relative of the owner of an investing individual retirement account or (ii) a participant or beneficiary of the Plan investing in the Offered Certificates in such capacity);
(2) the Plan Fiduciary is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with respect to particular transactions and investment strategies, including the acquisition by the Plan of Offered Certificates;
(3) the Plan Fiduciary is a “fiduciary” with respect to the Plan within the meaning of Section 3(21) of ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code, or both, and is responsible for exercising independent judgment in evaluating the Plan’s acquisition of the Offered Certificates;
(4) none of the Transaction Parties has exercised any authority to cause the Plan to invest in the Offered Certificates or to negotiate the terms of the Plan’s investment in the Offered Certificates or receives a fee or other compensation from the Plan or Plan Fiduciary for the provision of investment advice in connection with the acquisition by the Plan of the Offered Certificates; and
(5) the Plan Fiduciary has been informed by the Transaction Parties: (a) that none of the Transaction Parties is undertaking to provide impartial investment advice or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity, and that no such entity has given investment advice or otherwise made a recommendation, in connection with the Plan’s acquisition of the Offered Certificates; and (b) of the existence and nature of the Transaction Parties’ financial interests in the Plan’s acquisition of the Offered Certificates, as described in this prospectus.
The above representations are intended to comply with the DOL’s Reg. Sections 29 C.F.R. 2510.3-21(a) and (c)(1) as promulgated on April 8, 2016 (81 Fed. Reg. 20,997). If these regulations are revoked, repealed or no longer effective, these representations shall be deemed to be no longer in effect.
None of the Transaction Parties is undertaking to provide impartial investment advice, or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity, in connection with the acquisition of any Offered Certificates by any Plan.
Insurance Company General Accounts
Sections I and III of Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 95-60 exempt from the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of Sections 406(a), 406(b) and 407(a) of ERISA and Code Section 4975 transactions in connection with the acquisition of a security (such as a certificate issued by the issuing entity) as well as the servicing, management and operation of a trust (such as the issuing entity) in which an insurance company general account has an interest as a result of its acquisition of certificates issued by the issuing entity, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. If these conditions are met, insurance company general accounts investing assets that are treated as assets of Plans would be allowed to purchase certain classes of certificates which do not meet the ratings requirements of the Exemption. All other conditions of the Exemption would have to be satisfied in order for PTCE 95-60 to be available. Before purchasing any class of Offered Certificates, an insurance company general account seeking to rely on Sections I and III of PTCE 95-60 should itself confirm that all applicable conditions and other requirements have been satisfied.
586
Section 401(c) of ERISA provides certain exemptive relief from the provisions of Part 4 of Title I of ERISA and Code Section 4975, including the prohibited transaction restrictions imposed by ERISA and the related excise taxes imposed by the Code, for transactions involving an insurance company general account. Pursuant to Section 401(c) of ERISA, the DOL issued regulations (“401(c) Regulations”), generally effective July 5, 2001, to provide guidance for the purpose of determining, in cases where insurance policies supported by an insurance company’s general account are issued to or for the benefit of a Plan on or before December 31, 1998, which general account assets constitute Plan assets. Any assets of an insurance company general account which support insurance policies issued to a Plan after December 31, 1998 or issued to Plans on or before December 31, 1998 for which the insurance company does not comply with the 401(c) Regulations may be treated as Plan assets. In addition, because Section 401(c) of ERISA does not relate to insurance company separate accounts, separate account assets are still generally treated as Plan assets of any Plan invested in that separate account. Insurance companies contemplating the investment of general account assets in the Offered Certificates should consult with their counsel with respect to the applicability of Section 401(c) of ERISA.
Due to the complexity of these rules and the penalties imposed upon persons involved in prohibited transactions, it is particularly important that potential investors who are Plan fiduciaries or who are investing Plan assets consult with their counsel regarding the consequences under ERISA and the Code of their acquisition and ownership of certificates.
THE SALE OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES TO A PLAN IS IN NO RESPECT A REPRESENTATION BY THE DEPOSITOR OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS THAT THIS INVESTMENT MEETS ANY RELEVANT LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO INVESTMENTS BY PLANS GENERALLY OR ANY PARTICULAR PLAN, OR THAT THIS INVESTMENT IS APPROPRIATE FOR PLANS GENERALLY OR ANY PARTICULAR PLAN.
Legal Investment
None of the classes of Offered Certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended (“SMMEA”). Generally, the only classes of Offered Certificates which will qualify as “mortgage related securities” will be those that (1) are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by at least one NRSRO and (2) are part of a series evidencing interests in a trust consisting of loans originated by certain types of originators specified in SMMEA and secured by first liens on real estate.
Although Section 939(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act amended SMMEA, effective July 21, 2012, so as to require the SEC to establish creditworthiness standards by that date in substitution for the foregoing ratings test, the SEC has neither proposed nor adopted a rule establishing new creditworthiness standards for purposes of SMMEA as of the date of this prospectus. However, the SEC has issued a transitional interpretation (Release No. 34-67448 (effective July 20, 2012)), which provides that, until such time as final rules establishing new standards of creditworthiness become effective, the standard of creditworthiness for purposes of the definition of the term “mortgage related security” is a security that is rated in one of the two highest rating categories by at least one NRSRO. Depending on the standards of creditworthiness that are ultimately established by the SEC, it is possible that certain classes of Offered Certificates specified to be “mortgage related securities” for purposes of SMMEA may no longer qualify as such as of the time such new standards are effective.
587
The appropriate characterization of the Offered Certificates under various legal investment restrictions, and thus the ability of investors subject to those restrictions to purchase the Offered Certificates, are subject to significant interpretive uncertainties.
We make no representation as to the proper characterization of the Offered Certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, or other purposes, or as to the ability of particular investors to purchase any Offered Certificates under applicable legal investment restrictions. Further, any rating of a class of certificates below an “investment grade” rating (i.e., lower than the top four rating categories) by a Rating Agency or another NRSRO, whether initially or as a result of a ratings downgrade, may adversely affect the ability of an investor to purchase or retain, or otherwise impact the liquidity, market value, and regulatory characteristics of, that class. The uncertainties described above (and any unfavorable future determinations concerning the legal investment or financial institution regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates) may adversely affect the liquidity and market value of the Offered Certificates.
Accordingly, all investors whose investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities, should consult with their own legal advisors in determining whether and to what extent the Offered Certificates constitute legal investments or are subject to investment, capital, or other regulatory restrictions.
The issuing entity will not be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Legal Matters
The validity of the Offered Certificates and certain federal income tax matters will be passed upon for the depositor by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, New York, New York, and certain other legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriters by Sidley Austin LLP, New York, New York.
Ratings
It is a condition to their issuance that the Offered Certificates (other than the Class X-B, Class B and Class C certificates) receive investment grade credit ratings from the three (3) Rating Agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the Offered Certificates, and it is a condition to their issuance that the Class X-B, Class B and Class C certificates receive investment grade credit ratings from the two (2) Rating Agencies engaged by the depositor to rate such Offered Certificates.
We are not obligated to maintain any particular rating with respect to any class of Offered Certificates. Changes affecting the Mortgaged Properties, the parties to the PSA or another person may have an adverse effect on the ratings of the Offered Certificates, and thus on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates, although such adverse changes would not necessarily be an event of default under the related Mortgage Loan.
588
The ratings address the likelihood of full and timely receipt by the Certificateholders of all distributions of interest at the applicable Pass-Through Rate on the Offered Certificates to which they are entitled on each Distribution Date and the ultimate payment in full of the Certificate Balance of each class of Offered Certificates on a date that it not later than the Rated Final Distribution Date with respect to such class of certificates. The Rated Final Distribution Date will be the Distribution Date in February 2051. See “Yield and Maturity Considerations” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances”. Any ratings of each Offered Certificates should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities.
The ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, a measure of asset value or an indication of the suitability of an investment, and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by any Rating Agency. In addition, these ratings do not address: (a) the likelihood, timing, or frequency of prepayments (both voluntary and involuntary) and their impact on interest payments or the degree to which such prepayments might differ from those originally anticipated, (b) the possibility that a Certificateholder might suffer a lower than anticipated yield, (c) the likelihood of receipt of Yield Maintenance Charges, prepayment charges, Prepayment Premiums, prepayment fees or penalties, default interest or Excess Interest, (d) the likelihood of experiencing any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls, an assessment of whether or to what extent the interest payable on any class of Offered Certificates may be reduced in connection with any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls, or of receiving Compensating Interest Payments, (e) the tax treatment of the Offered Certificates or effect of taxes on the payments received, (f) the likelihood or willingness of the parties to the respective documents to meet their contractual obligations or the likelihood or willingness of any party or court to enforce, or hold enforceable, the documents in whole or in part, (g) an assessment of the yield to maturity that investors may experience, (h) the likelihood, timing or receipt of any payments of interest to the holders of the Offered Certificates resulting from an increase in the interest rate on any Mortgage Loan in connection with a Mortgage Loan modification, waiver or amendment, (i) Excess Interest or (ii) other non-credit risks, including, without limitation, market risks or liquidity.
The ratings take into consideration the credit quality of the underlying Mortgaged Properties and the Mortgage Loans, structural and legal aspects associated with the Offered Certificates, and the extent to which the payment stream of the Mortgage Loans is adequate to make payments required under the Offered Certificates. However, as noted above, the ratings do not represent an assessment of the likelihood, timing or frequency of principal prepayments (both voluntary and involuntary) by the borrowers, or the degree to which such prepayments might differ from those originally anticipated. In general, the ratings address credit risk and not prepayment risk. Ratings are forward-looking opinions about credit risk and express an agency’s opinion about the ability and willingness of an issuer of securities to meet its financial obligations in full and on time. Ratings are not indications of investment merit. In addition, the ratings do not represent an assessment of the yield to maturity that investors may experience or the possibility that investors might not fully recover their initial investment in the event of delinquencies or defaults or rapid prepayments on the Mortgage Loans (including both voluntary and involuntary prepayments) or the application of any Realized Losses. In the event that holders of such certificates do not fully recover their investment as a result of rapid principal prepayments on the Mortgage Loans, all amounts “due” to such holders will nevertheless have been paid, and such result is consistent with the ratings assigned to such certificates. As indicated in this prospectus, holders of the certificates with Notional Amounts are entitled only to payments of interest on the related Mortgage Loans. If the Mortgage Loans were to prepay in the initial month, with the result that the holders of the certificates with Notional Amounts
589
receive only a single month’s interest and therefore, suffer a nearly complete loss of their investment, all amounts “due” to such holders will nevertheless have been paid, and such result is consistent with the rating received on those certificates. The Notional Amounts of the certificates with Notional Amounts on which interest is calculated may be reduced by the allocation of Realized Losses and prepayments, whether voluntary or involuntary. The ratings do not address the timing or magnitude of reductions of such Notional Amount, but only the obligation to pay interest timely on the Notional Amount, as so reduced from time to time. Therefore, the ratings of the certificates with Notional Amounts should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities. See “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to the Certificates—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors” and “Yield and Maturity Considerations”.
Although the depositor will prepay fees for ongoing rating surveillance by certain of the Rating Agencies, the depositor has no obligation or ability to ensure that any Rating Agency performs ratings surveillance. In addition, a Rating Agency may cease ratings surveillance if the information furnished to that Rating Agency is insufficient to allow it to perform surveillance.
Any of the three (3) NRSROs that we hired may issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of certificates that we did not hire it to rate. Additionally, other NRSROs that we have not engaged to rate the Offered Certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of Offered Certificates relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from those ratings assigned by the Rating Agencies. The issuance of unsolicited ratings of a class of the Offered Certificates that are lower than the ratings assigned by the Rating Agencies may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class. As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the Offered Certificates, the depositor had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to three NRSROs. Based on final feedback from those three NRSROs at that time, the depositor hired the Rating Agencies to rate the Offered Certificates. Had the depositor selected other NRSROs to rate the Offered Certificates, we cannot assure you as to the ratings such other NRSROs would ultimately have assigned to the Offered Certificates. In the case of one NRSRO hired by the depositor, the depositor only requested ratings for certain classes of rated Offered Certificates, due in part to the final subordination levels provided by that NRSRO for the classes of Offered Certificates. If the depositor had selected that NRSRO to rate those other classes of certificates not rated by it, its ratings of those other certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to those certificates by the other two NRSROs hired by the depositor. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any other NRSRO, an NRSRO might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the depositor.
590
Index of Defined Terms
1 | |
17g-5 Information Provider | 385 |
1986 Act | 564 |
1996 Act | 540 |
2 | |
2015 Budget Act | 573 |
3 | |
30/360 Basis | 426 |
4 | |
401(c) Regulations | 587 |
A | |
AB Modified Loan | 439 |
AB Whole Loan | 238 |
Accelerated Mezzanine Loan Lender | 378 |
Acceptable Insurance Default | 443 |
Acting General Counsel’s Letter | 153 |
Active | 194 |
Actual/360 Basis | 217 |
Actual/360 Loans | 413 |
ADA | 543 |
Additional Exclusions | 443 |
Additional Primary Servicing Compensation | 335 |
Administrative Cost Rate | 360 |
ADR | 161 |
Advances | 408 |
Advisers Act | 585 |
Advisor | 195 |
Affirmative Asset Review Vote | 487 |
AFIN | 193 |
AIV | 343 |
ALTA | 284 |
Annual Debt Service | 161 |
Anticipated Repayment Date | 217 |
Appraisal Reduction Amount | 435 |
Appraisal Reduction Event | 434 |
Appraised Value | 161 |
Appraised-Out Class | 440 |
AR Global | 194 |
ARCP | 194 |
ARD Loan | 217 |
ASR Consultation Process | 458 |
Assessment of Compliance | 519 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Asset Review Fee | 433 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee | 433 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee Rate | 433 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Termination Event | 492 |
Asset Representations Reviewer Upfront Fee | 433 |
Asset Review | 489 |
Asset Review Notice | 487 |
Asset Review Quorum | 487 |
Asset Review Report | 490 |
Asset Review Report Summary | 490 |
Asset Review Standard | 489 |
Asset Review Trigger | 485 |
Asset Review Vote Election | 487 |
Asset Status Report | 455 |
Assumed Final Distribution Date | 369 |
Assumed Scheduled Payment | 362 |
ASTM | 188 |
Attestation Report | 519 |
Available Funds | 353 |
B | |
Balloon Balance | 162 |
Balloon LTV Ratio | 165 |
Balloon or ARD Payment | 165 |
Banking Act | 154 |
Bankruptcy Code | 533 |
Barclays | 315 |
Barclays Data Tape | 317 |
Barclays Mortgage Loans | 316 |
Barclays Review Team | 316 |
Barclays’ Qualification Criteria | 318 |
Base Amount | 214 |
Base Interest Fraction | 368 |
Beds | 171 |
BMARK 2018-B2 PSA | 238 |
Bond | 214 |
Bond Lease | 214 |
Borrower Party | 377 |
Borrower Party Affiliate | 377 |
591
BPC | 330 |
BPC Parties | 335 |
BPC Primary Serviced Mortgage Loans | 332 |
BPC Primary Servicer Termination Event | 337 |
BPC Primary Servicing Agreement | 332 |
Breach Notice | 397 |
BRRD | 136, 155 |
BSSF | 304 |
C | |
C(WUMP)O | 21 |
CAM | 194 |
Cash Flow Analysis | 162 |
CCRE Data Tape | 289 |
CCRE Deal Team | 289 |
CCRE Lending | 288 |
CCRE Mortgage Loans | 288 |
CERCLA | 540 |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee | 432 |
Certificate Administrator/Trustee Fee Rate | 432 |
Certificate Balance | 351 |
Certificate Owners | 388 |
Certificateholder | 378 |
Certificateholder Quorum | 495 |
Certificateholder Repurchase Request | 506 |
Certifying Certificateholder | 390 |
Chelmsford Spaces | 177 |
CIBC | 304 |
CIBC Data File | 312 |
CIBC Deal Team | 311 |
CIBX | 305 |
Circuit Court | 314 |
City Square and Clay Street PSA | 238 |
Class A Certificates | 350 |
Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance | 362 |
Class X Certificates | 350 |
Clearstream | 386 |
Clearstream Participants | 389 |
Closing Date | 160, 261 |
CMBS | 63, 288 |
CMBS B-Piece Securities | 343 |
CMMBS | 326 |
Code | 562 |
Collateral Deficiency Amount | 439 |
Collection Account | 412 |
Collection Period | 354 |
Communication Request | 390 |
Companion Distribution Account | 412 |
Companion Holder | 237 |
Companion Holders | 238 |
Companion Loan Rating Agency | 238 |
Companion Loans | 158 |
Compensating Interest Payment | 370 |
Constant Prepayment Rate | 552 |
Consultation Termination Event | 473 |
Control Appraisal Period | 238 |
Control Eligible Certificates | 466 |
Control Note | 238 |
Control Termination Event | 472 |
Controlling Class | 466 |
Controlling Class Certificateholder | 466 |
Controlling Companion Loan | 238 |
Controlling Holder | 238 |
Corrected Loan | 455 |
County | 214 |
CPP | 552 |
CPR | 552 |
CPY | 552 |
CREC | 190 |
Credit Risk Retention Rules | 340 |
CREFC® | 374 |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee | 434 |
CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate | 434 |
CREFC® Reports | 374 |
Cross-Over Date | 358 |
CrossPoint PSA | 238 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Asset Representations Reviewer | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Certificate Administrator | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Depositor | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Master Servicer | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Operating Advisor | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 PSA | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Special Servicer | 252 |
CSAIL 2017-CX10 Trustee | 252 |
Cumulative Appraisal Reduction Amount | 439, 440 |
Cure/Contest Period | 490 |
Cut-off Date | 158 |
Cut-off Date Balance | 163 |
Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio | 163 |
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | 163 |
592
D | |
Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 164 |
DEF(#) | 166 |
DEF/@(#) | 167 |
DEF/YM(#) | 167 |
DEF/YM@(#) | 167 |
Defaulted Loan | 462 |
Defeasance Deposit | 222 |
Defeasance Loans | 221 |
Defeasance Lock-Out Period | 221 |
Defeasance Option | 221 |
Definitive Certificate | 386 |
Delinquent Loan | 487 |
Depositories | 387 |
Determination Date | 352 |
Development Parcel | 224 |
DHCR | 197 |
Diligence File | 394 |
Directing Certificateholder | 465 |
Directing Holder Approval Process | 457 |
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees | 431 |
Discount Rate | 368 |
Dispute Resolution Consultation | 509 |
Dispute Resolution Cut-off Date | 509 |
Distribution Accounts | 412 |
Distribution Date | 352 |
Distribution Date Statement | 374 |
District Court | 325 |
Dodd-Frank Act | 133 |
DOL | 583 |
DSCR | 164 |
DTC | 386 |
DTC Participants | 387 |
DTC Rules | 388 |
Due Date | 216, 354 |
E | |
EDGAR | 581 |
EEA | 18 |
Effective Gross Income | 162 |
EIL | 189 |
Eligible Asset Representations Reviewer | 491 |
Eligible Operating Advisor | 480 |
Enforcing Party | 507 |
Enforcing Servicer | 507 |
ESA | 188, 310 |
Escrow/Reserve Mitigating Circumstances | 308, 321 |
EU Risk Retention and Due Diligence Requirements | 135 |
Euroclear | 386 |
Euroclear Operator | 389 |
Euroclear Participants | 389 |
Exception Schedules | 346 |
Excess Interest | 218 |
Excess Interest Distribution Account | 413 |
Excess Modification Fee Amount | 427 |
Excess Modification Fees | 425 |
Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall | 371 |
Exchange Act | 261, 322 |
Excluded Controlling Class Holder | 377 |
Excluded Controlling Class Loan | 378 |
Excluded Information | 378 |
Excluded Loan | 378 |
Excluded Plan | 585 |
Excluded Special Servicer | 495 |
Excluded Special Servicer Loan | 495 |
Exemption | 583 |
Exemption Rating Agency | 584 |
F | |
FATCA | 575 |
FDIA | 152 |
FDIC | 152 |
Federal Court Complaint | 325 |
FIEL | 22 |
Final Asset Status Report | 457 |
Final Dispute Resolution Election Notice | 510 |
Financial Promotion Order | 19 |
FIRREA | 156 |
Fitch | 517 |
FPO Persons | 19 |
FSMA | 20, 580 |
G | |
Gain-on-Sale Entitlement Amount | 354 |
Gain-on-Sale Remittance Amount | 354 |
Gain-on-Sale Reserve Account | 413 |
Garn Act | 542 |
GLA | 164 |
Government Securities | 219 |
Grantor Trust | 352, 562 |
H | |
High Net Worth Companies, Unincorporated Associations, Etc. | 19 |
593
I | |
IDA | 214 |
Indirect Participants | 387 |
Initial Delivery Date | 455 |
Initial Interest Deposit Amount | 355 |
Initial Pool Balance | 158 |
Initial Rate | 217 |
Initial Requesting Certificateholder | 506 |
Initial Subordinate Companion Loan Holder | 465 |
In-Place Cash Management | 164 |
Insolvency Act | 154 |
Insurance and Condemnation Proceeds | 412 |
Intercreditor Agreement | 238 |
Interest Accrual Amount | 360 |
Interest Accrual Period | 360 |
Interest Deposit Amount | 413 |
Interest Distribution Amount | 360 |
Interest Reserve Account | 412 |
Interest Shortfall | 360 |
Interested Person | 463 |
Investor Certification | 378 |
IORPs | 135 |
IRB | 214 |
K | |
KBRA | 517 |
KKR | 343 |
KKR Aggregator | 343 |
KKR Opportunity Partners | 343 |
L | |
Ladder Capital Group | 269 |
Ladder Capital Review Team | 278 |
Ladder Holdings | 269 |
LCF | 268 |
LCF Data Tape | 278 |
LCF Financing Affiliates | 269 |
LCF Mortgage Loans | 268 |
Liquidation Fee | 428 |
Liquidation Fee Rate | 428 |
Liquidation Proceeds | 412 |
LO(#) | 166 |
Loan Per Unit | 165 |
Loan-Specific Directing Certificateholder | 465 |
Lock-out Period | 219 |
Loss of Value Payment | 398 |
Losses | 336 |
Lower-Tier Regular Interests | 562 |
Lower-Tier REMIC | 352, 562 |
LTV | 291 |
LTV Ratio | 163 |
LTV Ratio at Maturity or Anticipated Repayment Date | 165 |
LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD | 165 |
M | |
MAI | 400 |
Major Decision | 467 |
Major Decision Reporting Package | 470 |
Managing Member | 236 |
MAS | 21 |
Master Servicer Major Decision | 470 |
Master Servicer Proposed Course of Action Notice | 508 |
Master Tenant | 208 |
Material Defect | 397 |
Maturity Date Balloon or ARD Payment | 165 |
MDEP | 191 |
Midland | 326 |
MiFID II | 18, 580 |
MLPA | 391 |
Modification Fees | 425 |
Moody’s | 517 |
Mortgage | 160 |
Mortgage File | 392 |
Mortgage Loans | 158 |
Mortgage Note | 160 |
Mortgage Pool | 158 |
Mortgage Rate | 360 |
Mortgaged Property | 160 |
N | |
National Inc. | 176 |
National Property | 176 |
Net Mortgage Rate | 359 |
Net Operating Income | 165 |
NI 33-105 | 23 |
NOI Date | 165 |
Non-Control Note | 238 |
Non-Controlling Holder | 239 |
Nonrecoverable Advance | 409 |
Non-Serviced AB Whole Loan | 239 |
Non-Serviced Certificate Administrator | 239 |
Non-Serviced Companion Loan | 239 |
Non-Serviced Directing Certificateholder | 239 |
Non-Serviced Master Servicer | 239 |
594
Non-Serviced Mortgage Loan | 239 |
Non-Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan | 239 |
Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan | 239 |
Non-Serviced PSA | 240 |
Non-Serviced Securitization Trust | 240 |
Non-Serviced Special Servicer | 240 |
Non-Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan | 240 |
Non-Serviced Trustee | 240 |
Non-Serviced Whole Loan | 240 |
Non-U.S. Person | 575 |
Notional Amount | 351 |
NRA | 166 |
NRSRO | 377 |
NRSRO Certification | 379 |
O | |
O(#) | 166 |
Occupancy As Of Date | 166 |
Occupancy Rate | 166 |
Offered Certificates | 350 |
OID Regulations | 566 |
OLA | 153 |
Operating Advisor Annual Report | 478 |
Operating Advisor Consultation Event | 345, 474 |
Operating Advisor Consulting Fee | 432 |
Operating Advisor Expenses | 433 |
Operating Advisor Fee | 432 |
Operating Advisor Fee Rate | 432 |
Operating Advisor Standard | 478 |
Operating Advisor Termination Event | 482 |
Operating Lessee | 186 |
P | |
P&I Advance | 407 |
P&I Advance Date | 407 |
Pace Loan | 236 |
Pads | 171 |
Par Purchase Price | 461 |
Pari Passu Companion Loans | 158 |
Pari Passu Mortgage Loan | 240 |
Park Bridge Financial | 338 |
Park Bridge Lender Services | 338 |
Parking Deck Parcel | 227 |
Parking Easement | 176 |
Participants | 386 |
Parties in Interest | 582 |
Pass-Through Rate | 358 |
Patriot Act | 544 |
PCIS Persons | 19 |
Peaceable | 236 |
Peaceable Street | 236 |
Percentage Interest | 352 |
Periodic Payments | 353 |
Permitted Investments | 352, 414 |
Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees | 431 |
PILOT | 215 |
PILOT Base Amount | 215 |
PILOT Payments | 215 |
PIPs | 192 |
Plan Fiduciary | 585 |
Plans | 582 |
PML | 275, 294 |
PRC | 20 |
Pre-2019 Securitization | 135 |
Preliminary Dispute Resolution Election Notice | 509 |
Prepayment Assumption | 567 |
Prepayment Interest Excess | 370 |
Prepayment Interest Shortfall | 370 |
Prepayment Premium | 368 |
Prepayment Provisions | 166 |
PRIIPS REGULATION | 18 |
Prime Rate | 411 |
Principal Balance Certificates | 350 |
Principal Distribution Amount | 361 |
Principal Shortfall | 362 |
Privileged Information | 481 |
Privileged Information Exception | 482 |
Privileged Person | 376 |
Professional Investors | 20 |
PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS | 21 |
Prohibited Prepayment | 371 |
PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER | 19 |
Property Substitution | 225 |
Proposed Course of Action | 508 |
Proposed Course of Action Notice | 508 |
Prospectus Directive | 580 |
PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE | 18 |
PSA | 349 |
PSA Party Repurchase Request | 507 |
PTCE | 586 |
PTE | 583 |
Purchase Price | 399 |
595
Q | |
Qualification Criteria | 280, 287 |
Qualified Replacement Special Servicer | 496 |
Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan | 400 |
Qualifying CRE Loan Percentage | 341 |
R | |
RAC No-Response Scenario | 516 |
Rated Final Distribution Date | 369 |
Rating Agencies | 517 |
Rating Agency Confirmation | 517 |
RCA | 193 |
RCAP | 196 |
RCS | 195 |
REA | 74, 176 |
Realized Loss | 373 |
REC | 188 |
Record Date | 352 |
Registration Statement | 581 |
Regular Certificates | 350 |
Regular Interestholder | 565 |
Regular Interests | 562 |
Regulation AB | 519 |
Reimbursement Rate | 411 |
REIT LLLP | 269 |
Related Proceeds | 410 |
Release Amount | 224 |
Release Date | 222 |
Relevant Institutions | 155 |
Relevant Persons | 19 |
Relief Act | 543 |
Remaining Term to Maturity or ARD | 167 |
REMIC | 562 |
REMIC Regulations | 562 |
REO Account | 413 |
REO Loan | 364 |
REO Property | 454 |
Replaced Properties | 225 |
Replaced Property | 225 |
Repurchase Request | 507 |
Requesting Certificateholder | 509 |
Requesting Holders | 441 |
Requesting Investor | 390 |
Requesting Party | 516 |
Required Credit Risk Retention Percentage | 341 |
Requirements | 544 |
Residual Certificates | 350 |
Resolution Authorities | 155 |
Resolution Authority | 136 |
Resolution Failure | 507 |
Resolved | 507 |
Restricted Group | 584 |
Restricted Party | 482 |
Retaining Sponsor | 340 |
Review Materials | 488 |
Revised Rate | 217 |
RevPAR | 167 |
Rialto Mortgage | 297 |
Rialto Mortgage Data Tape | 303 |
Rialto Mortgage Loans | 297 |
Rialto Mortgage Review Team | 302 |
Rialto Qualification Criteria | 304 |
RMBS | 325 |
Rooms | 171 |
Royal Park | 325 |
Rule 17g-5 | 379 |
S | |
Scheduled Principal Distribution Amount | 361 |
SEC | 261 |
Securities Act | 519 |
Securitization Accounts | 350, 414 |
Securitization Regulation | 135 |
SEL | 275, 294 |
Senior Certificates | 350 |
Serviced Companion Loan | 240 |
Serviced Companion Loan Securities | 501 |
Serviced Mortgage Loan | 240 |
Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan | 241 |
Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Securities | 500 |
Serviced Pari Passu Mortgage Loan | 241 |
Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loan | 241 |
Serviced Whole Loan | 241 |
Servicer Termination Event | 498 |
Servicing Advances | 408 |
Servicing Fee | 423 |
Servicing Fee Rate | 423 |
Servicing Shift Mortgage Loan | 241 |
Servicing Shift PSA | 241 |
Servicing Shift Securitization Date | 241 |
Servicing Shift Whole Loan | 241 |
Servicing Standard | 405 |
SF | 167 |
SFA | 21 |
596
SFO | 20 |
Similar Law | 582 |
SMMEA | 587 |
Société Générale | 280 |
Société Générale Data Tape | 286 |
Société Générale Deal Team | 285 |
Société Générale Mortgage Loans | 281 |
South Bend Orthopedic | 208 |
Special Servicer Major Decision | 470 |
Special Servicer Non-Major Decision | 448 |
Special Servicing Fee | 426 |
Special Servicing Fee Rate | 426 |
Specially Serviced Loans | 453 |
Sq. Ft. | 167 |
Square Feet | 167 |
SRB | 156 |
SSM | 156 |
Startup Day | 563 |
State Court Complaint | 325 |
Stated Principal Balance | 363 |
STG | 194 |
Structured Product | 20 |
Structuring Assumptions | 553 |
Subject Loan | 433 |
Subordinate Certificates | 350 |
Subordinate Companion Loan | 158, 241 |
Subsequent Asset Status Report | 455 |
Sub-Servicing Agreement | 406 |
Substitute Property | 225 |
T | |
T-12 | 167 |
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | 565 |
tax matters persons | 573 |
Term to Maturity | 167 |
Terms and Conditions | 389 |
Tests | 489 |
Third Party Purchaser | 340, 343 |
TIF | 214 |
Title V | 542 |
TMPs | 573 |
Total Operating Expenses | 162 |
Transaction Parties | 585 |
TRIPRA | 97 |
TRS LLLP | 269 |
Trust | 323 |
Trust REMICs | 352, 562 |
TTM | 167 |
U | |
U.S. Person | 574 |
U/W DSCR | 164 |
U/W Expenses | 167 |
U/W NCF | 168 |
U/W NCF Debt Yield | 170 |
U/W NCF DSCR | 164, 170 |
U/W NOI | 171 |
U/W NOI Debt Yield | 171 |
U/W NOI DSCR | 171 |
U/W Revenues | 171 |
UBS 2017-C7 PSA | 241 |
UBS AG, New York Branch | 24, 262 |
UBS AG, New York Branch Data Tape | 263 |
UBS AG, New York Branch Deal Team | 263 |
UBS AG, New York Branch Mortgage Loans | 263 |
UBS Qualification Criteria | 265 |
UBSRES | 262 |
UCC | 528 |
UCITS | 135 |
UK Bank | 154 |
Underwriter Entities | 121 |
Underwriting Agreement | 577 |
Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 164 |
Underwritten Expenses | 167 |
Underwritten NCF | 168 |
Underwritten NCF Debt Yield | 170 |
Underwritten Net Cash Flow | 168 |
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 170 |
Underwritten Net Operating Income | 171 |
Underwritten Net Operating Income Debt Service Coverage Ratio | 171 |
Underwritten NOI | 171 |
Underwritten NOI Debt Yield | 171 |
Underwritten Revenues | 171 |
Units | 171 |
Unscheduled Principal Distribution Amount | 362 |
Unsolicited Information | 489 |
Upper-Tier REMIC | 352, 562 |
USAO-SDNY | 195 |
UST | 190 |
597
V | |
Volcker Rule | 134 |
Voting Rights | 386 |
W | |
WAC Rate | 359 |
Weighted Average Mortgage Rate | 172 |
Weighted Averages | 172 |
Wells Fargo Bank | 325 |
Whole Loan | 158 |
Withheld Amounts | 413 |
Workout Fee | 427 |
Workout Fee Rate | 427 |
Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount | 411 |
Y | |
Yield Maintenance Charge | 369 |
Yield-Priced Principal Balance Certificates | 341 |
YM(#) | 167 |
YM@(#) | 167 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Control Appraisal Period | 258 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Controlling Subordinate Companion Noteholder | 252 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Intercreditor Agreement | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Lead Pari Passu Companion Loan Securitization | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgage Loan | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Mortgaged Properties | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Non-Directing Holder | 257 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Non-Lead Pari Passu Companion Loans | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Noteholders | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Pari Passu Companion Loans | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Senior Loan | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Sequential Pay Event | 253 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Subordinate Companion Loan | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Threshold Event Collateral | 259 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan | 251 |
Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan Directing Holder | 257 |
598
ANNEX A-1
CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MORTGAGE
LOANS
AND MORTGAGED PROPERTIES
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Mortgage Loan Seller(1) | Mortgage Loan Originator | Cross-Collateralized and Cross-Defaulted | Address(28) | City | County | State | Zip Code | General Property Type | Specific Property Type | Number of Properties |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | Retail | Anchored | 12 |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 6610-6750 North Durango Drive | Las Vegas | Clark | NV | 89149 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 4901 Outer Loop | Louisville | Jefferson | KY | 40219 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 3810-3910 South Maryland Parkway | Las Vegas | Clark | NV | 89119 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 8221-8301 Old Troy Pike | Huber Heights | Montgomery | OH | 45424 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 100 Station Drive | Anderson | Anderson | SC | 29621 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 5075 Morganton Road | Fayetteville | Cumberland | NC | 28314 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 303-333 Northwest Loop 410 | San Antonio | Bexar | TX | 78216 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 129 Bleachery Boulevard | Asheville | Buncombe | NC | 28803 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 13540 Hoover Creek Boulevard | Charlotte | Mecklenburg | NC | 28273 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 5801 North May Avenue | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | OK | 73112 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 1501 West New Haven Avenue | West Melbourne | Brevard | FL | 32904 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | SG; UBS AG | SG; UBS AG | No | 4241 North US Highway 98 | Lakeland | Polk | FL | 33809 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | CCRE; UBS AG | CCRE | No | Rochester Technology Park | Rochester | Monroe | NY | 14624 | Industrial | Flex | 1 |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | CCRE | CCRE | No | 900 Chelmsford Street | Lowell | Middlesex | MA | 01851 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | SG | SG; Barclays | No | 1800 North Mason Road | Katy | Harris | TX | 77449 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | RMF | RMF | No | 5425 South Padre Island | Corpus Christi | Nueces | TX | 78411 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | Various | Florham Park | Morris | NJ | 07932 | Office | Suburban | 4 |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 200 Park Avenue | Florham Park | Morris | NJ | 07932 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 230 Park Avenue | Florham Park | Morris | NJ | 07932 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 220 Park Avenue | Florham Park | Morris | NJ | 07932 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 210 Park Avenue | Florham Park | Morris | NJ | 07932 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | LCF | LCF | No | 500 12th Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Street and 1200 Clay Street | Oakland | Alameda | CA | 94612 | Mixed Use | Office/Garage/Retail | 1 |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | CIBC | CIBC | No | 2015 North Dunn Street | Bloomington | Monroe | IN | 47408 | Multifamily | Student Housing | 1 |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | 22 |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 4600 Durwood Boulevard | Rolla | Phelps | MO | 65401 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1510 West Lane Road | Machesney Park | Winnebago | IL | 61115 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1531 Thiesse Drive | Brainerd | Crow Wing | MN | 56401 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 2962 Salt Creek Parkway | Casper | Natrona | WY | 82601 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 2409 North Richmond Road | McHenry | McHenry | IL | 60050 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 215 Teal Road | Sulphur | Calcasieu Parish | LA | 70663 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 4505 McFarland Boulevard East | Tuscaloosa | Tuscaloosa | AL | 35405 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1080 Shop Road | Columbia | Richland | SC | 29201 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 3022 Faye Road | Jacksonville | Duval | FL | 32226 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 655 Romeo Way | Elko | Elko | NV | 89801 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1611 South West Avenue | Freeport | Stephenson | IL | 61032 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 101 12th Avenue Northwest | Hazen | Mercer | ND | 58545 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 954 Route 28 | Kingston | Ulster | NY | 12401 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 21841 Alabama Highway 59 | Robertsdale | Baldwin | AL | 36567 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1006 West Pipestone Avenue | Flandreau | Moody | SD | 57028 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 5991 Route 96 | Farmington | Ontario | NY | 14425 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 95 Main Street | Otego | Otsego | NY | 13825 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 6280 Route 209 | Kerhonkson | Ulster | NY | 12446 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 6523 Collamer Road | Dewitt | Onondaga | NY | 13057 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1700 Erie Street | Utica | Oneida | NY | 13502 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 3091 Route 26 | Parish | Oswego | NY | 13131 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 922 State Fair Boulevard | Geddes | Onondaga | NY | 13209 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | SG | SG | No | 2855 Main Street | Irvine | Orange | CA | 92614 | Hospitality | Extended Stay | 1 |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | Industrial | Various | 8 |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | LCF | LCF | No | 46643 Ryan Court | Wixom | Oakland | MI | 48393 | Industrial | Flex/R&D | 1 |
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | LCF | LCF | No | 10088 South 136th Street | Omaha | Sarpy | NE | 38138 | Industrial | Light Industrial | 1 |
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | LCF | LCF | No | 350 International Drive | Mount Olive | Morris | NJ | 07828 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | LCF | LCF | No | 210 Pierce Road | St. Johnsbury | Caledonia | VT | 5819 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | LCF | LCF | No | 815 Industrial Parkway | St. Johnsbury | Caledonia | VT | 05819 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | LCF | LCF | No | 11495 Deerfield Road | Cincinnati | Hamilton | OH | 45242 | Industrial | Manufacturing | 1 |
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | LCF | LCF | No | 12 Mechanic Street | Groveton | Coos | NH | 03582 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | LCF | LCF | No | 911 Industrial Parkway | St. Johnsbury | Caledonia | VT | 05819 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | SG | SG; Citi | No | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 4 |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | SG | SG; Citi | No | 4300 Georgia Pacific Boulevard | Frederick | Frederick | MD | 21704 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | SG | SG; Citi | No | 419 Maple Street | Bellingham | Norfolk | MA | 02019 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | SG | SG; Citi | No | 200 Hosea Road | Lawrenceville | Gwinnett | GA | 30046 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | SG | SG; Citi | No | 1712 East D Street | Butner | Granville | NC | 27509 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | LCF | LCF | No | 2299 West Obispo Avenue | Gilbert | Maricopa | AZ | 85233 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | LCF | LCF | No | 1115 Paul Martin Drive | Edgewood | Harford | MD | 21040 | Manufactured Housing Community | Manufactured Housing Community | 1 |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | CIBC | CIBC | No | 10203 Sam Houston Park Drive | Houston | Harris | TX | 77064 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 7900 & 8000 78th Street West | Edina | Hennepin | MN | 55439 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | CCRE | CCRE | No | 4851 South Alameda Street | Los Angeles | Los Angeles | CA | 90058 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | RMF | RMF | No | 1990 West Nasa Boulevard | Melbourne | Brevard | FL | 32904 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | RMF | RMF | No | 17752 Beach Boulevard | Huntington Beach | Orange | CA | 92647 | Office | Medical | 1 |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | LCF | LCF | No | 3200 & 3236 La Orilla Road NW | Albuquerque | Bernalillo | NM | 87120 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | CCRE | CCRE | No | Various | South Bend | St. Joseph | IN | 46635 | Office | Medical | 2 |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | CCRE | CCRE | No | 53990 Carmichael Drive | South Bend | St. Joseph | IN | 46635 | Office | Medical | 1 |
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | CCRE | CCRE | No | 53880 Carmichael Drive | South Bend | St. Joseph | IN | 46635 | Office | Medical | 1 |
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | UBS AG | Natixis; UBS AG | No | Various | New York | New York | NY | 10028 | Multifamily | High Rise | 2 |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | UBS AG | Natixis; UBS AG | No | 305 East 86th Street | New York | New York | NY | 10028 | Multifamily | High Rise | 1 |
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | UBS AG | Natixis; UBS AG | No | 160 East 88th Street | New York | New York | NY | 10028 | Multifamily | High Rise | 1 |
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | SG | SG | No | Various | Various | Cook | IL | Various | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 3 |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | SG | SG | No | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | Arlington Heights | Cook | IL | 60005 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | SG | SG | No | 8811 South 77th Avenue | Bridgeview | Cook | IL | 60455 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | SG | SG | No | 7400 West 100th Place | Bridgeview | Cook | IL | 60455 | Industrial | Warehouse/Distribution | 1 |
24 | Loan | Concord Place | LCF | LCF | No | 2999 North 44th Street | Phoenix | Maricopa | AZ | 85018 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | CIBC | CIBC | No | 4202, 4406, 4422 Fortuna Center Plaza | Dumfries | Prince William | VA | 22025 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | LCF | LCF | No | 2600 S. Lincoln Avenue | Loveland | Larimer | CO | 80537 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Various | Summit | OH | Various | Multifamily | Garden | 5 |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Norton | Summit | OH | 44203 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Stow | Summit | OH | 44224 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Cuyahoga Falls | Summit | OH | 44221 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
A-1-1
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Mortgage Loan Seller(1) | Mortgage Loan Originator | Cross-Collateralized and Cross-Defaulted | Address(28) | City | County | State | Zip Code | General Property Type | Specific Property Type | Number of Properties |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Akron | Summit | OH | 44301 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Akron | Summit | OH | 44305 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | LCF | LCF | No | 10 Park Place | Atlanta | Fulton | GA | 30303 | Office | CBD | 1 |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | SG | SG | No | 7230 West Harry Street | Wichita | Sedgwick | KS | 67209 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 1 |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | CCRE | CCRE | No | 895-901 & 1051 South West End Boulevard | Quakertown | Bucks | PA | 18951 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 2751 Northwest Mall Circle | Jensen Beach | Martin | FL | 34957 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 18711-18737 Ventura Boulevard | Tarzana | Los Angeles | CA | 91356 | Mixed Use | Retail/Office | 1 |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 249 East Ocean Boulevard | Long Beach | Los Angeles | CA | 90802 | Office | Suburban | 1 |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 100 & 102 Dorset Street and 2 & 4 Market Street | South Burlington | Chittenden | VT | 05403 | Mixed Use | Retail/Office | 1 |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | Various | Various | Various | Various | Various | Retail | Various | 3 |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 2901 Plainfield Road | Joliet | Will | IL | 60435 | Retail | Shadow Anchored | 1 |
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 4010 Durham-Chapel Hill Boulevard | Durham | Durham | NC | 27707 | Retail | Unanchored | 1 |
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 1601-1605 IL 50 | Bradley | Kankakee | IL | 60914 | Retail | Shadow Anchored | 1 |
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 29389 & 29309 Industrial Way & 918 Nob Hill Road | Evergreen | Jefferson | CO | 80439 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | RMF | RMF | No | 3095 Oak Grove Road | Poplar Bluff | Butler | MO | 63901 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | LCF | LCF | No | 400 East Arbor Street | Long Beach | Los Angeles | CA | 90805 | Manufactured Housing Community | Manufactured Housing Community | 1 |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | RMF | RMF | No | 998 Washington Boulevard | Roseville | Placer | CA | 95678 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 1312 Hospitality Street | Ruston | Lincoln Parish | LA | 71270 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 1 |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | SG | SG | No | 2125 Corporate Center Drive | Trinity | Pasco | FL | 34655 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 1 |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | Various | Moss Point | Jackson | MS | 39563 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 2 |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 6730 Highway 63 North | Moss Point | Jackson | MS | 39563 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 1 |
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 6801 SR 63 North | Moss Point | Jackson | MS | 39563 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 1 |
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | CIBC | CIBC | No | 12 Westview Commons Boulevard | Gates | Monroe | NY | 14624 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | CIBC | CIBC | No | Various | Baton Rouge | East Baton Rouge | LA | Various | Hospitality | Extended Stay | 2 |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | CIBC | CIBC | No | 11544 N. Harrells Ferry Road | Baton Rouge | East Baton Rouge | LA | 70816 | Hospitality | Extended Stay | 1 |
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | CIBC | CIBC | No | 8382 Airline Highway | Baton Rouge | East Baton Rouge | LA | 70815 | Hospitality | Extended Stay | 1 |
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | CCRE | CCRE | No | 12831, 12873, 12919 Campus Parkway | Noblesville | Hamilton | IN | 46060 | Retail | Shadow Anchored | 1 |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | LCF | LCF | No | 6939 Dusty Trail Lane | Memphis | Shelby | TN | 38133 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | LCF | LCF | No | 1175 West Winneconne Avenue | Neenah | Winnegbago | WI | 54956 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | LCF | LCF | No | Various | Brooklyn | Kings | NY | Various | Various | Various | 3 |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | LCF | LCF | No | 462 Myrtle Avenue | Brooklyn | Kings | NY | 11216 | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1 |
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | LCF | LCF | No | 815 Saint John’s Place | Brooklyn | Kings | NY | 11216 | Multifamily | Mid Rise | 1 |
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | LCF | LCF | No | 219 Dekalb Avenue | Brooklyn | Kings | NY | 11205 | Mixed Use | Multifamily/Retail | 1 |
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | LCF | LCF | No | 1001-1025 Westhaven Blvd | Franklin | Williamson | TN | 37064 | Mixed Use | Medical/Office/Retail | 1 |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | RMF | RMF | No | 6200 West Bellfort Street | Houston | Harris | TX | 77035 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | LCF | LCF | No | 3301 South Street | Sacramento | Sacramento | CA | 95816 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 8055 West Sahara Avenue | Las Vegas | Clark | NV | 89117 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | RMF | RMF | No | 1909-1953 Powerline Road | Fort Lauderdale | Broward | FL | 33311 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 2616 P Street Northwest | Washington | District of Columbia | DC | 20007 | Hospitality | Limited Service | 1 |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 1117 West Washington Street | Appleton | Outagamie | WI | 54914 | Self Storage | Self Storage | 1 |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 100 Fairfield Avenue | Bridgeport | Fairfield | CT | 06604 | Mixed Use | Office/Retail | 1 |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | UBS AG | UBS AG | No | 398 US Highway 51 North | Ridgeland | Madison | MS | 39157 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | Barclays Bank PLC | Barclays Bank PLC | No | 645-679 Manor Drive | Pacifica | San Mateo | CA | 94044 | Multifamily | Garden | 1 |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | CIBC | CIBC | No | 1100 & 1200 South FM 51 | Decatur | Wise | TX | 76234 | Retail | Anchored | 1 |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | CCRE | CCRE | No | 6842 & 6880 Douglas Boulevard | Douglasville | Douglas | GA | 30135 | Retail | Unanchored | 1 |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | CIBC | CIBC | No | 1801 West Harrison Avenue | Harlingen | Cameron | TX | 78550 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | RMF | RMF | No | 1401 Veterans Parkway | Clarksville | Clark | IN | 47129 | Retail | Shadow Anchored | 1 |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | CIBC | CIBC | No | 4519 Dallas Acworth Highway | Dallas | Paulding | GA | 30132 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | CIBC | CIBC | No | 1621 South Division Street | Guthrie | Logan | OK | 73044 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | LCF | LCF | No | 1213 North 4th Avenue | Winterset | Madison | IA | 50273 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | LCF | LCF | No | 2425 East Beaver Road | Kawkawlin | Bay County | MI | 48631 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | LCF | LCF | No | 8990 Walnut Street | Rockford | Wright | MN | 55373 | Retail | Free-Standing | 1 |
A-1-2
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Year Built | Year Renovated | Number of Units(27) | Unit of Measure(27) | Cut-off Date Balance Per Unit/SF(3) | Original Balance(3) | Cut-off Date Balance(3) | % of Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date | Maturity Balance | ARD | Final Maturity Date |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | Various | Various | 2,418,910 | Sq. Ft. | 87 | 60,000,000 | 60,000,000 | 5.7% | 01/01/2028 | 60,000,000 | No | N/A |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | 2005 | N/A | 179,721 | Sq. Ft. | 9,440,000 | 9,440,000 | 0.9% | 9,440,000 | ||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | 2014 | N/A | 205,918 | Sq. Ft. | 6,982,857 | 6,982,857 | 0.7% | 6,982,857 | ||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | 1996 | 2000 | 204,568 | Sq. Ft. | 6,957,143 | 6,957,143 | 0.7% | 6,957,143 | ||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | 1994 | 2017 | 318,330 | Sq. Ft. | 5,814,286 | 5,814,286 | 0.6% | 5,814,286 | ||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | 2001 | N/A | 244,171 | Sq. Ft. | 4,531,429 | 4,531,429 | 0.4% | 4,531,429 | ||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | 1986, 2004, 2007 | 2003 | 226,089 | Sq. Ft. | 4,494,286 | 4,494,286 | 0.4% | 4,494,286 | ||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | 1995-1999 | N/A | 207,121 | Sq. Ft. | 4,477,143 | 4,477,143 | 0.4% | 4,477,143 | ||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | 2004 | N/A | 142,617 | Sq. Ft. | 4,034,286 | 4,034,286 | 0.4% | 4,034,286 | ||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | 2014 | N/A | 140,697 | Sq. Ft. | 4,025,714 | 4,025,714 | 0.4% | 4,025,714 | ||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | 1992-1994 | N/A | 233,797 | Sq. Ft. | 3,817,143 | 3,817,143 | 0.4% | 3,817,143 | ||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | 1984 | N/A | 144,484 | Sq. Ft. | 3,565,714 | 3,565,714 | 0.3% | 3,565,714 | ||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | 1986 | N/A | 171,397 | Sq. Ft. | 1,860,000 | 1,860,000 | 0.2% | 1,860,000 | ||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 1966-1983 | 2000-2004, 2017 | 3,353,230 | Sq. Ft. | 33 | 56,500,000 | 56,440,256 | 5.4% | 1/6/2028 | 46,475,073 | No | N/A |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | 1979 | 2017 | 1,320,254 | Sq. Ft. | 114 | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | 4.8% | 2/6/2028 | 50,000,000 | No | N/A |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | 1973, 2000-2005 | N/A | 1,500,596 | Sq. Ft. | 56 | 49,000,000 | 49,000,000 | 4.7% | 02/01/2028 | 40,459,175 | No | N/A |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | 1989 | 2017 | 377,261 | Sq. Ft. | 126 | 47,500,000 | 47,500,000 | 4.5% | 2/6/2028 | 47,500,000 | No | N/A |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | Various | Various | 354,381 | Sq. Ft. | 176 | 45,000,000 | 45,000,000 | 4.3% | 2/6/2028 | 45,000,000 | No | N/A |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | 1974 | 2016 | 160,518 | Sq. Ft. | 20,385,360 | 20,385,360 | 2.0% | 20,385,360 | ||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | 1974 | 2016 | 67,924 | Sq. Ft. | 10,475,280 | 10,475,280 | 1.0% | 10,475,280 | ||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | 1974 | 2015 | 68,116 | Sq. Ft. | 7,562,880 | 7,562,880 | 0.7% | 7,562,880 | ||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | 1976 | 2015 | 57,823 | Sq. Ft. | 6,576,480 | 6,576,480 | 0.6% | 6,576,480 | ||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 1986, 1992 | N/A | 246,136 | Sq. Ft. | 366 | 45,000,000 | 45,000,000 | 4.3% | 2/6/2028 | 45,000,000 | No | N/A |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 1930-2002 | 2016 | 342 | Units | 100,877 | 34,500,000 | 34,500,000 | 3.3% | 9/1/2027 | 34,500,000 | No | N/A |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | Various | Various | 459,230 | Sq. Ft. | 73 | 33,400,000 | 33,400,000 | 3.2% | 1/6/2028 | 33,400,000 | No | N/A |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | 2017 | N/A | 141,582 | Sq. Ft. | 6,403,768 | 6,403,768 | 0.6% | 6,403,768 | ||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | 2003 | N/A | 6,039 | Sq. Ft. | 2,543,134 | 2,543,134 | 0.2% | 2,543,134 | ||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | 2016 | N/A | 53,739 | Sq. Ft. | 2,511,077 | 2,511,077 | 0.2% | 2,511,077 | ||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | 2017 | N/A | 29,246 | Sq. Ft. | 2,404,223 | 2,404,223 | 0.2% | 2,404,223 | ||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | 2002 | N/A | 6,039 | Sq. Ft. | 2,158,458 | 2,158,458 | 0.2% | 2,158,458 | ||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | 2016 | N/A | 20,900 | Sq. Ft. | 1,736,383 | 1,736,383 | 0.2% | 1,736,383 | ||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | 1992 | 2013 | 1,256 | Sq. Ft. | 1,607,702 | 1,607,702 | 0.2% | 1,607,702 | ||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | 1999 | N/A | 19,979 | Sq. Ft. | 1,375,750 | 1,375,750 | 0.1% | 1,375,750 | ||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | 2008 | N/A | 25,125 | Sq. Ft. | 1,228,825 | 1,228,825 | 0.1% | 1,228,825 | ||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | 2016 | N/A | 12,000 | Sq. Ft. | 1,191,426 | 1,191,426 | 0.1% | 1,191,426 | ||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | 2014 | N/A | 18,000 | Sq. Ft. | 1,175,398 | 1,175,398 | 0.1% | 1,175,398 | ||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | 2008 | N/A | 25,612 | Sq. Ft. | 1,057,858 | 1,057,858 | 0.1% | 1,057,858 | ||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | 2014 | N/A | 9,100 | Sq. Ft. | 886,891 | 886,891 | 0.1% | 886,891 | ||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | 2001 | N/A | 1,621 | Sq. Ft. | 857,441 | 857,441 | 0.1% | 857,441 | ||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | 2008 | N/A | 25,612 | Sq. Ft. | 849,492 | 849,492 | 0.1% | 849,492 | ||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | 2014 | N/A | 9,100 | Sq. Ft. | 838,807 | 838,807 | 0.1% | 838,807 | ||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | 2014 | N/A | 9,026 | Sq. Ft. | 806,750 | 806,750 | 0.1% | 806,750 | ||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | 2015 | N/A | 9,100 | Sq. Ft. | 796,065 | 796,065 | 0.1% | 796,065 | ||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | 2014 | N/A | 9,002 | Sq. Ft. | 764,009 | 764,009 | 0.1% | 764,009 | ||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | 2013 | N/A | 9,100 | Sq. Ft. | 747,981 | 747,981 | 0.1% | 747,981 | ||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | 2013 | N/A | 9,026 | Sq. Ft. | 747,981 | 747,981 | 0.1% | 747,981 | ||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | 2014 | N/A | 9,026 | Sq. Ft. | 710,581 | 710,581 | 0.1% | 710,581 | ||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | 2000 | 2017 | 174 | Rooms | 189,655 | 33,000,000 | 33,000,000 | 3.2% | 02/01/2028 | 33,000,000 | No | N/A |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | Various | Various | 627,526 | Sq. Ft. | 52 | 32,750,000 | 32,750,000 | 3.1% | 2/6/2028 | 32,750,000 | No | N/A |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | 2015 | N/A | 127,105 | Sq. Ft. | 13,341,000 | 13,341,000 | 1.3% | 13,341,000 | ||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | 2007 | N/A | 58,546 | Sq. Ft. | 4,098,300 | 4,098,300 | 0.4% | 4,098,300 | ||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | 2017 | N/A | 48,300 | Sq. Ft. | 3,843,200 | 3,843,200 | 0.4% | 3,843,200 | ||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | 2000 | N/A | 87,100 | Sq. Ft. | 2,700,000 | 2,700,000 | 0.3% | 2,700,000 | ||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | 1994 | N/A | 84,949 | Sq. Ft. | 2,700,000 | 2,700,000 | 0.3% | 2,700,000 | ||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | 1969 | 1998 | 97,864 | Sq. Ft. | 2,667,500 | 2,667,500 | 0.3% | 2,667,500 | ||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | 1967 | 2015 | 82,862 | Sq. Ft. | 2,100,000 | 2,100,000 | 0.2% | 2,100,000 | ||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | 1985 | N/A | 40,800 | Sq. Ft. | 1,300,000 | 1,300,000 | 0.1% | 1,300,000 | ||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | Various | Various | 2,307,835 | Sq. Ft. | 31 | 28,600,000 | 28,600,000 | 2.7% | 02/06/2023 | 28,600,000 | No | N/A |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | 1996 | N/A | 680,252 | Sq. Ft. | 9,880,000 | 9,880,000 | 0.9% | 9,880,000 | ||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | 1988 | 2006 | 489,950 | Sq. Ft. | 9,327,500 | 9,327,500 | 0.9% | 9,327,500 | ||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | 1996 | N/A | 585,637 | Sq. Ft. | 5,720,000 | 5,720,000 | 0.5% | 5,720,000 | ||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | 1996 | N/A | 551,996 | Sq. Ft. | 3,672,500 | 3,672,500 | 0.4% | 3,672,500 | ||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | 1998 | 2017 | 180,480 | Sq. Ft. | 140 | 25,350,000 | 25,350,000 | 2.4% | 2/6/2028 | 25,350,000 | No | N/A |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | 1974 | N/A | 482 | Pads | 48,755 | 23,500,000 | 23,500,000 | 2.2% | 1/6/2028 | 21,072,779 | No | N/A |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | 2014-2015 | N/A | 108,498 | Sq. Ft. | 203 | 22,000,000 | 22,000,000 | 2.1% | 1/1/2028 | 19,241,119 | No | N/A |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | 1981; 1983 | 1999; 2015-2017 | 216,924 | Sq. Ft. | 101 | 21,800,000 | 21,800,000 | 2.1% | 1/6/2028 | 18,560,282 | No | N/A |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | 1925-1927 | 1995 | 255,993 | Sq. Ft. | 69 | 17,750,000 | 17,750,000 | 1.7% | 2/6/2028 | 15,780,908 | No | N/A |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | 2000 | N/A | 191,500 | Sq. Ft. | 85 | 16,300,000 | 16,300,000 | 1.6% | 2/6/2028 | 16,300,000 | No | N/A |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | 2017 | N/A | 44,487 | Sq. Ft. | 360 | 16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | 1.5% | 1/6/2028 | 16,000,000 | No | N/A |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | 2016 | N/A | 59,189 | Sq. Ft. | 260 | 15,400,000 | 15,383,103 | 1.5% | 1/6/2028 | 12,602,029 | No | N/A |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | 2000 | N/A | 77,393 | Sq. Ft. | 196 | 15,200,000 | 15,200,000 | 1.5% | 2/6/2028 | 12,540,109 | No | N/A |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | 2000 | N/A | 41,124 | Sq. Ft. | 8,665,421 | 8,665,421 | 0.8% | 7,149,035 | ||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | 2000 | N/A | 36,269 | Sq. Ft. | 6,534,579 | 6,534,579 | 0.6% | 5,391,075 | ||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | Various | 2014-2017 | 827 | Units | 241,838 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | 1.4% | 10/6/2022 | 15,000,000 | No | N/A |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | 1964 | 2014-2017 | 690 | Units | 12,555,000 | 12,555,000 | 1.2% | 12,555,000 | ||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | 1963 | 2014-2017 | 137 | Units | 2,445,000 | 2,445,000 | 0.2% | 2,445,000 | ||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Various | N/A | 637,746 | Sq. Ft. | 23 | 14,400,000 | 14,400,000 | 1.4% | 02/01/2028 | 11,547,064 | No | N/A |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | 1980 | N/A | 304,506 | Sq. Ft. | 8,114,286 | 8,114,286 | 0.8% | 6,506,679 | ||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | 1974 | N/A | 175,647 | Sq. Ft. | 3,885,714 | 3,885,714 | 0.4% | 3,115,874 | ||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | 1972 | N/A | 157,593 | Sq. Ft. | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 0.2% | 1,924,511 | ||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | 1998 | 2005 | 134,432 | Sq. Ft. | 106 | 14,300,000 | 14,300,000 | 1.4% | 2/6/2028 | 14,300,000 | No | N/A |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | 2005 | N/A | 104,694 | Sq. Ft. | 129 | 13,500,000 | 13,500,000 | 1.3% | 2/1/2028 | 13,500,000 | No | N/A |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | 1993-2015 | N/A | 227,194 | Sq. Ft. | 57 | 13,000,000 | 13,000,000 | 1.2% | 1/6/2028 | 13,000,000 | No | N/A |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | Various | Various | 314 | Units | 41,083 | 12,900,000 | 12,900,000 | 1.2% | 12/6/2027 | 11,699,637 | No | N/A |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | Various | Various | 87 | Units | 5,445,042 | 5,445,042 | 0.5% | 4,938,373 | ||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | Various | Various | 81 | Units | 2,740,793 | 2,740,793 | 0.3% | 2,485,758 | ||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | Various | Various | 63 | Units | 2,271,813 | 2,271,813 | 0.2% | 2,060,417 |
A-1-3
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Year Built | Year Renovated | Number of Units(27) | Unit of Measure(27) | Cut-off Date Balance Per Unit/SF(3) | Original Balance(3) | Cut-off Date Balance(3) | % of Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance | Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date | Maturity Balance | ARD | Final Maturity Date |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | Various | Various | 48 | Units | 1,358,215 | 1,358,215 | 0.1% | 1,231,831 | ||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | Various | Various | 35 | Units | 1,084,136 | 1,084,136 | 0.1% | 983,256 | ||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | 1920 | 2017 | 138,021 | Sq. Ft. | 92 | 12,750,000 | 12,750,000 | 1.2% | 1/6/2028 | 9,763,309 | No | N/A |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | 2016 | N/A | 125 | Rooms | 99,093 | 12,400,000 | 12,386,589 | 1.2% | 01/01/2028 | 10,167,857 | No | N/A |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | 2004 | 2012 | 58,339 | Sq. Ft. | 209 | 12,200,000 | 12,200,000 | 1.2% | 1/6/2028 | 11,229,055 | No | N/A |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | 2007 | N/A | 89,060 | Sq. Ft. | 134 | 11,900,000 | 11,900,000 | 1.1% | 1/6/2028 | 10,168,928 | No | N/A |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | 1986 | 1994 | 48,242 | Sq. Ft. | 245 | 11,800,000 | 11,800,000 | 1.1% | 12/6/2027 | 11,800,000 | No | N/A |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | 1981 | 1992 | 112,215 | Sq. Ft. | 100 | 11,250,000 | 11,250,000 | 1.1% | 2/6/2028 | 9,894,932 | No | N/A |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | 1972 (100 Dorset Street); 1993 (2 Market Street); 1995 (4 Market Street); 1996 (102 Dorset Street); 1996 (Parking Garage/Deck) | N/A | 95,091 | Sq. Ft. | 118 | 11,200,000 | 11,188,022 | 1.1% | 1/6/2028 | 9,198,278 | No | N/A |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | Various | N/A | 23,916 | Sq. Ft. | 401 | 9,600,000 | 9,590,475 | 0.9% | 1/6/2028 | 7,964,432 | No | N/A |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | 2017 | N/A | 8,216 | Sq. Ft. | 3,530,000 | 3,526,497 | 0.3% | 2,928,588 | ||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | 2015 | N/A | 8,400 | Sq. Ft. | 3,260,000 | 3,256,765 | 0.3% | 2,704,588 | ||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | 2016 | N/A | 7,300 | Sq. Ft. | 2,810,000 | 2,807,212 | 0.3% | 2,331,256 | ||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | 2002; 2016 | N/A | 95,895 | Sq. Ft. | 99 | 9,500,000 | 9,500,000 | 0.9% | 2/6/2028 | 9,500,000 | No | N/A |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | 2017 | N/A | 127,784 | Sq. Ft. | 71 | 9,100,000 | 9,100,000 | 0.9% | 12/6/2027 | 8,366,722 | No | N/A |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | 1945 | N/A | 96 | Pads | 93,750 | 9,000,000 | 9,000,000 | 0.9% | 2/6/2023 | 9,000,000 | No | N/A |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | 1996 | N/A | 86,670 | Sq. Ft. | 96 | 8,350,000 | 8,350,000 | 0.8% | 1/6/2028 | 8,350,000 | No | N/A |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | 2016 | N/A | 84 | Rooms | 96,567 | 8,120,000 | 8,111,647 | 0.8% | 1/6/2028 | 6,704,366 | No | N/A |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | 2015 | N/A | 87 | Rooms | 91,954 | 8,000,000 | 8,000,000 | 0.8% | 02/01/2028 | 6,603,456 | No | N/A |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | Various | Various | 159 | Rooms | 49,686 | 7,900,000 | 7,900,000 | 0.8% | 2/6/2028 | 6,038,626 | No | N/A |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | 2007 | N/A | 77 | Rooms | 4,900,000 | 4,900,000 | 0.5% | 3,745,477 | ||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | 1995 | 2012 | 82 | Rooms | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 0.3% | 2,293,149 | ||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | 2017 | N/A | 61 | Units | 128,279 | 7,825,000 | 7,825,000 | 0.7% | 11/1/2027 | 6,890,658 | No | N/A |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | 2010 | 2016 | 242 | Rooms | 30,992 | 7,500,000 | 7,500,000 | 0.7% | 2/1/2023 | 6,775,161 | No | N/A |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | 2010 | 2016 | 121 | Rooms | 3,882,979 | 3,882,979 | 0.4% | 3,507,708 | ||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | 2010 | 2016 | 121 | Rooms | 3,617,021 | 3,617,021 | 0.3% | 3,267,453 | ||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 2017 | N/A | 21,155 | Sq. Ft. | 355 | 7,500,000 | 7,500,000 | 0.7% | 1/6/2028 | 6,434,154 | No | N/A |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | 1985 | N/A | 122 | Units | 59,939 | 7,312,500 | 7,312,500 | 0.7% | 1/6/2028 | 6,568,599 | No | N/A |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | 2000 | N/A | 86,854 | Sq. Ft. | 83 | 7,200,000 | 7,200,000 | 0.7% | 9/6/2027 | 6,157,520 | No | N/A |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | Various | N/A | 12 | Units | 583,333 | 7,000,000 | 7,000,000 | 0.7% | 1/6/2028 | 7,000,000 | No | N/A |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | 1905 | N/A | 3 | Units | 2,625,000 | 2,625,000 | 0.3% | 2,625,000 | ||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | 1931 | N/A | 6 | Units | 2,312,500 | 2,312,500 | 0.2% | 2,312,500 | ||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | 1905 | N/A | 3 | Units | 2,062,500 | 2,062,500 | 0.2% | 2,062,500 | ||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | 2008 | N/A | 33,056 | Sq. Ft. | 198 | 6,550,000 | 6,550,000 | 0.6% | 2/6/2028 | 5,900,236 | No | N/A |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | 1972 | N/A | 251 | Units | 24,900 | 6,250,000 | 6,250,000 | 0.6% | 2/6/2023 | 5,849,025 | No | N/A |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | 1994 | 2011 | 54,547 | Sq. Ft. | 113 | 6,150,000 | 6,150,000 | 0.6% | 2/6/2028 | 6,150,000 | No | N/A |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | 1996 | N/A | 106,610 | Sq. Ft. | 56 | 6,000,000 | 6,000,000 | 0.6% | 2/6/2028 | 6,000,000 | No | N/A |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | 1951 | N/A | 77,627 | Sq. Ft. | 74 | 5,775,000 | 5,775,000 | 0.6% | 2/6/2028 | 5,103,196 | No | N/A |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | 1903; 1960 | 2016 | 15 | Rooms | 366,271 | 5,500,000 | 5,494,060 | 0.5% | 1/6/2028 | 4,510,826 | No | N/A |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | 1955 | 2013 | 91,680 | Sq. Ft. | 50 | 4,600,000 | 4,584,320 | 0.4% | 11/6/2027 | 3,769,908 | No | N/A |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | 1971 | N/A | 85,668 | Sq. Ft. | 53 | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | 0.4% | 2/6/2028 | 3,670,525 | No | N/A |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | 1994 | N/A | 67,761 | Sq. Ft. | 66 | 4,500,000 | 4,500,000 | 0.4% | 2/6/2028 | 3,722,012 | No | N/A |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | 1962 | 2017 | 32 | Units | 125,000 | 4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 0.4% | 1/6/2028 | 4,000,000 | No | N/A |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | 1987, 2008 | N/A | 62,463 | Sq. Ft. | 63 | 4,000,000 | 3,965,670 | 0.4% | 6/1/2027 | 3,315,090 | No | N/A |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 2004; 2007 | N/A | 30,300 | Sq. Ft. | 124 | 3,750,000 | 3,750,000 | 0.4% | 2/6/2028 | 3,092,780 | No | N/A |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | 2007 | N/A | 14,820 | Sq. Ft. | 219 | 3,250,000 | 3,250,000 | 0.3% | 2/1/2028 | 3,250,000 | No | N/A |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | 2010 | N/A | 20,000 | Sq. Ft. | 158 | 3,150,000 | 3,150,000 | 0.3% | 2/6/2028 | 2,753,799 | No | N/A |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | 2007 | N/A | 14,820 | Sq. Ft. | 189 | 2,800,000 | 2,800,000 | 0.3% | 2/1/2028 | 2,800,000 | No | N/A |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | 2007 | N/A | 10,500 | Sq. Ft. | 261 | 2,742,750 | 2,742,750 | 0.3% | 2/1/2028 | 2,742,750 | No | N/A |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | 2017 | N/A | 9,026 | Sq. Ft. | 105 | 945,000 | 945,000 | 0.1% | 2/6/2028 | 945,000 | Yes | 2/6/2033 |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | 2017 | N/A | 9,100 | Sq. Ft. | 102 | 927,500 | 927,500 | 0.1% | 2/6/2028 | 927,500 | Yes | 2/6/2033 |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | 2017 | N/A | 9,100 | Sq. Ft. | 98 | 896,000 | 896,000 | 0.1% | 2/6/2028 | 896,000 | Yes | 2/6/2033 |
A-1-4
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Origination Date | First Pay Date | Payment Day | Gross Mortgage Rate | Total Administrative Fee | Net Mortgage Rate | ARD Rate | Interest Accrual Method | Monthly Debt Service Payment | Amortization Type | Original Term to Maturity or ARD | Remaining Term to Maturity or ARD | Original IO Term | Remaining IO Term | Original Amortization Term | Remaining Amortization Term | Seasoning | Prepayment Provisions(5)(6) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | 12/08/2017 | 02/01/2018 | 1 | 4.191000% | 0.011550% | 4.179450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 212,460.42 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | LO(11);YM1(107);O(2) |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | ||||||||||||||||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | ||||||||||||||||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | ||||||||||||||||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | ||||||||||||||||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | ||||||||||||||||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | ||||||||||||||||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | ||||||||||||||||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | ||||||||||||||||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | ||||||||||||||||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | ||||||||||||||||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | ||||||||||||||||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 12/11/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 5.021000% | 0.011550% | 5.009450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 304,029.77 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(90);O(5) |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | 1/16/2018 | 3/4/2018 | 4 | 4.734000% | 0.012800% | 4.721200% | N/A | Actual/360 | 199,989.58 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(90);O(6) |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | 01/22/2018 | 03/01/2018 | 1 | 5.141000% | 0.011550% | 5.129450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 267,281.21 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);YM1(92);O(4) |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | 1/18/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.530000% | 0.011550% | 4.518450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 181,802.95 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | 1/19/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.081500% | 0.011550% | 5.069950% | N/A | Actual/360 | 193,202.86 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(89);O(7) |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | ||||||||||||||||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | ||||||||||||||||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | ||||||||||||||||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 1/25/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.728000% | 0.011550% | 4.716450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 179,762.50 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(93);O(3) |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 8/8/2017 | 10/1/2017 | 1 | 4.690000% | 0.011550% | 4.678450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 136,710.24 | Full IO | 120 | 115 | 120 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 5 | LO(29);DEF(84);O(7) |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | 12/27/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.066000% | 0.011550% | 4.054450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 114,742.14 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | YM1(25);DEF/YM1(91);O(4) |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | ||||||||||||||||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | ||||||||||||||||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | ||||||||||||||||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | ||||||||||||||||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | ||||||||||||||||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | ||||||||||||||||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | ||||||||||||||||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | ||||||||||||||||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | ||||||||||||||||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | ||||||||||||||||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | ||||||||||||||||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | ||||||||||||||||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | ||||||||||||||||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | 01/12/2018 | 03/01/2018 | 1 | 4.635000% | 0.031550% | 4.603450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 129,232.81 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(61);YM1(55);O(4) |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | 1/26/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.320000% | 0.011550% | 4.308450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 119,537.50 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(12);YM1(104);O(4) |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | ||||||||||||||||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | ||||||||||||||||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | ||||||||||||||||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | ||||||||||||||||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | ||||||||||||||||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | ||||||||||||||||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | ||||||||||||||||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | ||||||||||||||||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | 01/10/2018 | 03/06/2018 | 6 | 4.470000% | 0.011550% | 4.458450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 108,014.65 | Full IO | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(32);O(4) |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | ||||||||||||||||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | ||||||||||||||||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | ||||||||||||||||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | ||||||||||||||||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | 1/17/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.541000% | 0.011550% | 4.529450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 97,260.97 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | 12/7/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.565000% | 0.011550% | 4.553450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 119,980.37 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 48 | 47 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | 12/29/2017 | 2/1/2018 | 1 | 4.470000% | 0.060300% | 4.409700% | N/A | Actual/360 | 111,078.95 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 36 | 35 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(92);O(3) |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | 12/22/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.384000% | 0.011550% | 4.372450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 108,959.94 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 24 | 23 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | 1/24/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.212000% | 0.060300% | 5.151700% | N/A | Actual/360 | 97,598.80 | Partial IO | 120 | 120 | 36 | 36 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | 1/19/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.920000% | 0.050300% | 4.869700% | N/A | Actual/360 | 67,758.19 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | 1/9/2018 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.680000% | 0.011550% | 4.668450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 63,266.67 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | 12/28/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.863000% | 0.041550% | 4.821450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 81,385.93 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(92);O(3) |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | 1/18/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.115000% | 0.031550% | 5.083450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 82,668.52 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(93);O(3) |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | ||||||||||||||||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | ||||||||||||||||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 10/3/2017 | 11/6/2017 | 6 | 2.740000% | 0.012800% | 2.727200% | N/A | Actual/360 | 34,725.69 | Full IO | 60 | 56 | 60 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 4 | LO(28);DEF(25);O(7) |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | ||||||||||||||||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | ||||||||||||||||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 01/17/2018 | 03/01/2018 | 1 | 4.270000% | 0.011550% | 4.258450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 71,008.05 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | ||||||||||||||||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | ||||||||||||||||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | ||||||||||||||||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | 1/25/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.680000% | 0.051550% | 4.628450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 56,544.58 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(93);O(3) |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | 1/18/2018 | 3/1/2018 | 1 | 4.520000% | 0.011550% | 4.508450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 51,556.25 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | 12/15/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.867000% | 0.011550% | 4.855450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 53,458.14 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | 11/28/2017 | 1/6/2018 | 6 | 5.170000% | 0.011550% | 5.158450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 70,596.43 | Partial IO | 120 | 118 | 48 | 46 | 360 | 360 | 2 | LO(26);DEF(90);O(4) |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | ||||||||||||||||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | ||||||||||||||||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-5
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Origination Date | First Pay Date | Payment Day | Gross Mortgage Rate | Total Administrative Fee | Net Mortgage Rate | ARD Rate | Interest Accrual Method | Monthly Debt Service Payment | Amortization Type | Original Term to Maturity or ARD | Remaining Term to Maturity or ARD | Original IO Term | Remaining IO Term | Original Amortization Term | Remaining Amortization Term | Seasoning | Prepayment Provisions(5)(6) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | ||||||||||||||||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | ||||||||||||||||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | 1/5/2018 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.885000% | 0.011550% | 4.873450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 73,683.46 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 8 | 7 | 300 | 300 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | 12/13/2017 | 02/01/2018 | 1 | 4.925000% | 0.011550% | 4.913450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 65,998.67 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | 12/21/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.872000% | 0.031550% | 4.840450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 64,541.19 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 60 | 59 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | 12/21/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.521000% | 0.051550% | 4.469450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 60,444.13 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 24 | 23 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | 11/30/2017 | 1/6/2018 | 6 | 4.642000% | 0.011550% | 4.630450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 46,280.31 | Full IO | 120 | 118 | 120 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 2 | LO(26);DEF(90);O(4) |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | 1/18/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.719500% | 0.011550% | 4.707950% | N/A | Actual/360 | 58,478.68 | Partial IO | 120 | 120 | 36 | 36 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(12);YM1(104);O(4) |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | 1/4/2018 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.972800% | 0.011550% | 4.961250% | N/A | Actual/360 | 59,937.98 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | 1/9/2018 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 5.287200% | 0.011550% | 5.275650% | N/A | Actual/360 | 53,232.96 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | ||||||||||||||||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | ||||||||||||||||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | ||||||||||||||||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | 1/26/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.997200% | 0.011550% | 4.985650% | N/A | Actual/360 | 40,110.63 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | 12/6/2017 | 1/6/2018 | 6 | 4.800000% | 0.011550% | 4.788450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 47,744.55 | Partial IO | 120 | 118 | 60 | 58 | 360 | 360 | 2 | LO(23);YM1(93);O(4) |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | 1/26/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 6.160000% | 0.011550% | 6.148450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 46,841.67 | Full IO | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(32);O(4) |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | 12/12/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.420000% | 0.011550% | 4.408450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 31,183.00 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | 1/5/2018 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 5.137000% | 0.011550% | 5.125450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 44,272.32 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(24);YM1(92);O(4) |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | 01/11/2018 | 03/01/2018 | 1 | 5.131000% | 0.011550% | 5.119450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 43,588.50 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | 1/26/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.630600% | 0.011550% | 5.619050% | N/A | Actual/360 | 49,130.99 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 300 | 300 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | ||||||||||||||||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | ||||||||||||||||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | 10/26/2017 | 12/1/2017 | 1 | 4.770000% | 0.080300% | 4.689700% | N/A | Actual/360 | 40,913.29 | Partial IO | 120 | 117 | 36 | 33 | 360 | 360 | 3 | LO(27);DEF(90);O(3) |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | 1/25/2018 | 3/1/2018 | 1 | 5.950000% | 0.080300% | 5.869700% | N/A | Actual/360 | 48,093.63 | Amortizing | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 300 | 300 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(32);O(4) |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | ||||||||||||||||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | ||||||||||||||||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 12/18/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.669000% | 0.080300% | 4.588700% | N/A | Actual/360 | 38,758.21 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 24 | 23 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);YM1(90);O(5) |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | 12/19/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.655000% | 0.011550% | 4.643450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 37,727.86 | Partial IO | 120 | 119 | 48 | 47 | 360 | 360 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | 8/25/2017 | 10/6/2017 | 6 | 4.550000% | 0.011550% | 4.538450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 36,695.56 | Partial IO | 120 | 115 | 24 | 19 | 360 | 360 | 5 | LO(29);DEF(88);O(3) |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | 12/28/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 5.023000% | 0.011550% | 5.011450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 29,707.79 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | ||||||||||||||||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | ||||||||||||||||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | ||||||||||||||||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | 1/9/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.805000% | 0.011550% | 4.793450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 34,385.38 | Partial IO | 120 | 120 | 48 | 48 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(93);O(3) |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | 1/22/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 6.040000% | 0.011550% | 6.028450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 37,632.79 | Amortizing | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(32);O(4) |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | 1/22/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.108000% | 0.011550% | 5.096450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 26,542.09 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | 1/23/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.374000% | 0.011550% | 4.362450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 22,173.75 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | 1/12/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.930000% | 0.011550% | 4.918450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 30,754.86 | Partial IO | 120 | 120 | 36 | 36 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | 1/5/2018 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.931000% | 0.011550% | 4.919450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 29,293.69 | Amortizing | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 359 | 1 | LO(23);YM1(93);O(4) |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | 11/10/2017 | 12/6/2017 | 6 | 4.908000% | 0.011550% | 4.896450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 24,435.80 | Amortizing | 120 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 357 | 3 | LO(27);DEF(89);O(4) |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | 1/26/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 4.768000% | 0.011550% | 4.756450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 23,522.98 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | 1/23/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.194500% | 0.011550% | 5.182950% | N/A | Actual/360 | 24,694.70 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | 12/21/2017 | 2/6/2018 | 6 | 4.021000% | 0.051550% | 3.969450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 13,589.49 | Full IO | 120 | 119 | 120 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 1 | LO(25);DEF(91);O(4) |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | 5/23/2017 | 7/1/2017 | 1 | 5.250000% | 0.011550% | 5.238450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 22,088.15 | Amortizing | 120 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 352 | 8 | LO(32);DEF(85);O(3) |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 1/11/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.105000% | 0.031550% | 5.073450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 20,372.14 | Amortizing | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | 1/25/2018 | 3/1/2018 | 1 | 4.840000% | 0.011550% | 4.828450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 13,290.39 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | 1/19/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.420000% | 0.011550% | 5.408450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 17,727.57 | Partial IO | 120 | 120 | 24 | 24 | 360 | 360 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | 1/25/2018 | 3/1/2018 | 1 | 4.840000% | 0.011550% | 4.828450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 11,450.19 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | 1/25/2018 | 3/1/2018 | 1 | 4.840000% | 0.011550% | 4.828450% | N/A | Actual/360 | 11,216.07 | Full IO | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | LO(24);DEF(92);O(4) |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | 1/18/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.200000% | 0.011550% | 5.188450% | 9.200000% | Actual/360 | 4,151.88 | Full IO, ARD | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | YM(24);DEF/YM(89);O(7) |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | 1/18/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.200000% | 0.011550% | 5.188450% | 9.200000% | Actual/360 | 4,074.99 | Full IO, ARD | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | YM(24);DEF/YM(89);O(7) |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | 1/18/2018 | 3/6/2018 | 6 | 5.200000% | 0.011550% | 5.188450% | 9.200000% | Actual/360 | 3,936.59 | Full IO, ARD | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | YM(24);DEF/YM(89);O(7) |
A-1-6
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Grace Period Default | Grace Period Late | Grace Period at Maturity Default | Appraised Value(4) | Appraisal Date(4) | U/W NOI DSCR(3) | U/W NCF DSCR(3) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(3)(4) | LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD(3)(4) | U/W NOI Debt Yield(3) | U/W NCF Debt Yield(3) | U/W EGI | U/W Expenses | U/W NOI | U/W Replacement | U/W TI/LC(31) | U/W NCF | Occupancy Rate(26) | Occupancy as-of Date(26) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 371,735,000 | Various | 2.62 | 2.34 | 56.5% | 56.5% | 11.1% | 9.9% | 33,252,972 | 9,911,495 | 23,341,476 | 406,890 | 2,096,069 | 20,838,518 | 90.3% | 11/28/2017 |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | 52,450,000 | 11/01/2017 | 4,326,440 | 883,953 | 3,442,487 | 48,525 | 292,206 | 3,101,756 | 94.3% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | 38,800,000 | 10/23/2017 | 3,364,160 | 799,133 | 2,565,027 | 8,237 | 132,029 | 2,424,762 | 94.4% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | 38,650,000 | 11/01/2017 | 3,232,152 | 649,545 | 2,582,607 | 59,325 | 262,793 | 2,260,490 | 91.0% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | 36,330,000 | 11/01/2017 | 4,094,859 | 1,480,817 | 2,614,042 | 28,650 | 190,597 | 2,394,795 | 97.4% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | 28,000,000 | 11/01/2017 | 3,091,780 | 1,029,130 | 2,062,650 | 70,810 | 127,834 | 1,864,006 | 84.3% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | 27,675,000 | 10/25/2017 | 2,654,383 | 736,639 | 1,917,744 | 40,696 | 190,414 | 1,686,633 | 100.0% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | 39,800,000 | 11/02/2017 | 2,926,568 | 1,406,310 | 1,520,258 | 12,427 | 109,669 | 1,398,161 | 87.8% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | 22,580,000 | 11/01/2017 | 1,876,278 | 497,196 | 1,379,082 | 19,966 | 121,671 | 1,237,445 | 90.5% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | 25,000,000 | 11/01/2017 | 1,868,180 | 679,324 | 1,188,855 | 5,628 | 101,254 | 1,081,973 | 65.4% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | 25,600,000 | 10/24/2017 | 2,038,766 | 516,667 | 1,522,099 | 46,759 | 265,877 | 1,209,463 | 78.6% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | 21,900,000 | 10/29/2017 | 2,329,861 | 720,082 | 1,609,779 | 14,448 | 65,623 | 1,529,708 | 98.3% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | 14,950,000 | 10/27/2017 | 1,449,545 | 512,698 | 936,846 | 51,419 | 236,103 | 649,325 | 94.9% | 11/28/2017 | |||||||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210,000,000 | 12/1/2017 | 1.63 | 1.42 | 52.6% | 43.3% | 10.5% | 9.2% | 20,719,987 | 9,101,345 | 11,618,642 | 611,684 | 871,840 | 10,135,118 | 68.1% | 1/26/2018 |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | 2 | 2 | 0 | 250,000,000 | 1/8/2018 | 2.45 | 2.24 | 60.0% | 60.0% | 11.8% | 10.7% | 31,402,846 | 13,741,126 | 17,661,721 | 224,443 | 1,320,254 | 16,117,023 | 95.4% | 1/11/2018 |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 144,000,000 | 10/17/2017 | 1.61 | 1.44 | 58.3% | 48.2% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 9,141,820 | 274,255 | 8,867,565 | 375,149 | 600,238 | 7,892,178 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78,900,000 | 11/17/2017 | 2.48 | 2.27 | 60.2% | 60.2% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 7,412,908 | 2,008,304 | 5,404,604 | 67,907 | 377,262 | 4,959,436 | 97.0% | 1/4/2018 |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | 0 | 0, 5 days once every 12 month period | 0 | 96,000,000 | 12/4/2017 | 2.05 | 1.80 | 65.1% | 65.1% | 10.6% | 9.3% | 10,846,056 | 4,239,641 | 6,606,415 | 133,267 | 673,348 | 5,799,800 | 94.3% | 12/6/2017 |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | 43,400,000 | 12/4/2017 | 4,754,882 | 1,772,460 | 2,982,422 | 70,628 | 336,089 | 2,575,705 | 88.8% | 12/6/2017 | |||||||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | 22,300,000 | 12/4/2017 | 2,302,545 | 854,654 | 1,447,892 | 12,906 | 75,885 | 1,359,101 | 100.0% | 12/6/2017 | |||||||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | 16,100,000 | 12/4/2017 | 2,029,365 | 865,652 | 1,163,713 | 30,652 | 139,894 | 993,167 | 100.0% | 12/6/2017 | |||||||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | 14,000,000 | 12/4/2017 | 1,759,265 | 746,876 | 1,012,388 | 19,082 | 121,481 | 871,826 | 96.4% | 12/6/2017 | |||||||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 0 | 0 | 0 | 181,000,000 | 12/20/2017 | 1.87 | 1.76 | 49.7% | 49.7% | 8.9% | 8.4% | 12,274,319 | 4,223,100 | 8,051,219 | 90,174 | 376,332 | 7,584,713 | 94.2% | 12/31/2017 |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 7 | 7 | 0 | 58,700,000 | 6/1/2017 | 2.01 | 1.95 | 58.8% | 58.8% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 5,202,218 | 1,905,624 | 3,296,594 | 100,600 | 0 | 3,195,994 | 99.7% | 11/8/2017 |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62,515,000 | Various | 3.01 | 2.81 | 53.4% | 53.4% | 12.4% | 11.6% | 4,647,036 | 496,106 | 4,150,930 | 49,287 | 237,125 | 3,864,518 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | 12,000,000 | 11/15/2017 | 893,864 | 160,415 | 733,449 | 21,237 | 87,388 | 624,823 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | 4,760,000 | 11/17/2017 | 316,025 | 6,321 | 309,705 | 906 | 14,490 | 294,309 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | 4,700,000 | 11/21/2017 | 387,609 | 70,346 | 317,263 | 8,061 | 38,461 | 270,741 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | 4,500,000 | 11/20/2017 | 297,639 | 20,576 | 277,063 | 4,387 | 23,025 | 249,652 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | 4,040,000 | 11/17/2017 | 260,319 | 5,206 | 255,113 | 906 | 12,452 | 241,755 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | 3,250,000 | 11/16/2017 | 250,422 | 5,008 | 245,413 | 0 | 0 | 245,413 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | 3,000,000 | 11/10/2017 | 183,163 | 3,663 | 179,500 | 188 | 5,055 | 174,256 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | 2,575,000 | 11/13/2017 | 196,730 | 3,935 | 192,795 | 0 | 0 | 192,795 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | 2,300,000 | 11/15/2017 | 171,738 | 3,435 | 168,304 | 0 | 0 | 168,304 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | 2,230,000 | 11/14/2017 | 169,757 | 3,395 | 166,362 | 0 | 0 | 166,362 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | 2,200,000 | 11/17/2017 | 150,164 | 4,914 | 145,250 | 2,700 | 12,501 | 130,048 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | 1,980,000 | 11/19/2017 | 138,905 | 2,778 | 136,127 | 3,842 | 15,917 | 116,368 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | 1,660,000 | 11/20/2017 | 157,696 | 41,405 | 116,291 | 0 | 0 | 116,291 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | 1,600,000 | 11/20/2017 | 103,742 | 2,075 | 101,667 | 243 | 2,999 | 98,425 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | 1,590,000 | 11/15/2017 | 111,612 | 2,232 | 109,379 | 4,098 | 14,867 | 90,415 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | 1,570,000 | 11/12/2017 | 135,048 | 24,946 | 110,102 | 0 | 0 | 110,102 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | 1,510,000 | 11/14/2017 | 116,988 | 11,604 | 105,385 | 0 | 0 | 105,385 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | 1,490,000 | 11/20/2017 | 124,915 | 20,555 | 104,360 | 0 | 0 | 104,360 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | 1,430,000 | 11/9/2017 | 124,646 | 24,453 | 100,193 | 0 | 0 | 100,193 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | 1,400,000 | 11/9/2017 | 120,300 | 28,377 | 91,923 | 1,365 | 5,062 | 85,496 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | 1,400,000 | 11/9/2017 | 114,512 | 22,209 | 92,302 | 1,354 | 4,908 | 86,040 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | 1,330,000 | 11/9/2017 | 121,240 | 28,257 | 92,984 | 0 | 0 | 92,984 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55,000,000 | 10/31/2017 | 2.97 | 2.65 | 60.0% | 60.0% | 14.0% | 12.4% | 10,105,430 | 5,493,288 | 4,612,142 | 505,272 | 0 | 4,106,870 | 87.2% | 12/15/2017 |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62,625,000 | Various | 2.85 | 2.76 | 52.3% | 52.3% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 5,062,626 | 981,519 | 4,081,107 | 125,505 | 0 | 3,955,602 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | 22,000,000 | 11/22/2017 | 1,557,304 | 66,189 | 1,491,115 | 25,421 | 0 | 1,465,694 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | 9,400,000 | 11/20/2017 | 776,259 | 159,534 | 616,725 | 11,709 | 0 | 605,016 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | 8,600,000 | 11/21/2017 | 587,089 | 154,791 | 432,298 | 9,660 | 0 | 422,638 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | 5,300,000 | 11/29/2017 | 486,795 | 115,132 | 371,663 | 17,420 | 0 | 354,243 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | 5,100,000 | 11/29/2017 | 477,913 | 115,685 | 362,227 | 16,990 | 0 | 345,238 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | 5,350,000 | 11/21/2017 | 549,340 | 228,811 | 320,529 | 19,573 | 0 | 300,956 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | 4,425,000 | 11/29/2017 | 391,451 | 78,300 | 313,151 | 16,572 | 0 | 296,579 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | 2,450,000 | 11/29/2017 | 236,476 | 63,076 | 173,400 | 8,160 | 0 | 165,240 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111,450,000 | Various | 2.67 | 2.46 | 64.2% | 64.2% | 12.1% | 11.1% | 12,023,790 | 3,373,690 | 8,650,101 | 346,175 | 343,946 | 7,959,979 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | 38,000,000 | 12/21/2017 | 4,224,554 | 1,242,085 | 2,982,469 | 102,038 | 100,977 | 2,779,454 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | 36,900,000 | 12/20/2017 | 4,207,598 | 1,409,692 | 2,797,906 | 73,493 | 74,646 | 2,649,767 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | 22,400,000 | 12/21/2017 | 2,106,890 | 352,719 | 1,754,171 | 87,846 | 87,730 | 1,578,595 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | 14,150,000 | 12/20/2017 | 1,484,749 | 369,194 | 1,115,555 | 82,799 | 80,593 | 952,163 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 | |||||||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | 0 | 5 | 0 | 41,850,000 | 12/4/2017 | 2.08 | 1.88 | 60.6% | 60.6% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 3,688,429 | 1,265,597 | 2,422,832 | 45,120 | 180,480 | 2,197,232 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35,860,000 | 10/24/2017 | 1.27 | 1.25 | 65.5% | 58.8% | 7.8% | 7.7% | 2,804,639 | 980,697 | 1,823,942 | 24,100 | 0 | 1,799,842 | 91.1% | 10/31/2017 |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | 7 | 7 | 0 | 34,500,000 | 11/20/2017 | 1.68 | 1.61 | 63.8% | 55.8% | 10.2% | 9.7% | 3,208,566 | 964,165 | 2,244,401 | 21,700 | 81,374 | 2,141,327 | 100.0% | 1/4/2018 |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29,800,000 | 12/7/2017 | 1.87 | 1.69 | 73.2% | 62.3% | 11.2% | 10.1% | 4,647,658 | 2,197,663 | 2,449,996 | 43,385 | 201,781 | 2,204,830 | 90.1% | 10/12/2017 |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28,400,000 | 11/15/2017 | 1.33 | 1.25 | 62.5% | 55.6% | 8.8% | 8.2% | 2,062,995 | 506,735 | 1,556,260 | 40,959 | 51,198 | 1,464,103 | 86.6% | 11/15/2017 |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27,000,000 | 12/1/2017 | 2.59 | 2.55 | 60.4% | 60.4% | 12.9% | 12.7% | 2,231,622 | 127,879 | 2,103,743 | 28,725 | 0 | 2,075,018 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30,200,000 | 11/22/2017 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 53.0% | 53.0% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 2,145,247 | 878,226 | 1,267,020 | 4,449 | 0 | 1,262,572 | 87.7% | 10/20/2017 |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22,050,000 | 1/1/2018 | 1.41 | 1.36 | 69.8% | 57.2% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 1,540,086 | 166,816 | 1,373,271 | 8,878 | 32,554 | 1,331,839 | 100.0% | 12/22/2017 |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21,400,000 | 10/24/2017 | 1.50 | 1.40 | 69.7% | 57.5% | 9.8% | 9.2% | 2,096,811 | 610,417 | 1,486,394 | 15,479 | 77,393 | 1,393,522 | 100.0% | 12/19/2017 |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | 12,200,000 | 10/24/2017 | 1,182,777 | 323,112 | 859,665 | 8,225 | 41,124 | 810,316 | 100.0% | 12/19/2017 | |||||||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | 9,200,000 | 10/24/2017 | 914,034 | 287,305 | 626,729 | 7,254 | 36,269 | 583,206 | 100.0% | 12/19/2017 | |||||||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 890,000,000 | 8/15/2017 | 4.31 | 4.28 | 22.5% | 22.5% | 12.0% | 11.9% | 38,084,023 | 14,135,899 | 23,948,124 | 183,139 | 0 | 23,764,985 | 92.0% | 9/24/2017 |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | 745,000,000 | 8/15/2017 | 32,703,002 | 11,369,959 | 21,333,043 | 145,916 | 0 | 21,187,127 | 93.0% | 9/24/2017 | |||||||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | 145,000,000 | 8/15/2017 | 5,381,021 | 2,765,940 | 2,615,081 | 37,223 | 0 | 2,577,858 | 86.9% | 9/24/2017 | |||||||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,200,000 | Various | 2.09 | 1.75 | 57.1% | 45.8% | 12.4% | 10.3% | 3,367,780 | 1,582,803 | 1,784,977 | 115,385 | 180,771 | 1,488,821 | 98.3% | 11/27/2017 |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | 14,200,000 | 11/16/2017 | 1,811,547 | 780,938 | 1,030,609 | 55,420 | 103,308 | 871,881 | 96.4% | 11/27/2017 | |||||||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | 6,800,000 | 11/21/2017 | 897,608 | 359,603 | 538,004 | 28,801 | 43,065 | 466,138 | 100.0% | 11/27/2017 | |||||||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | 4,200,000 | 11/21/2017 | 658,625 | 442,262 | 216,363 | 31,164 | 34,398 | 150,802 | 100.0% | 11/27/2017 | |||||||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22,000,000 | 11/30/2017 | 2.15 | 1.91 | 65.0% | 65.0% | 10.2% | 9.1% | 2,722,816 | 1,266,868 | 1,455,948 | 26,886 | 134,858 | 1,294,204 | 91.4% | 11/28/2017 |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | 7 | 7 | 0 | 21,900,000 | 12/12/2017 | 2.69 | 2.56 | 61.6% | 61.6% | 12.3% | 11.7% | 2,412,615 | 750,067 | 1,662,548 | 9,422 | 68,935 | 1,584,191 | 100.0% | 1/16/2018 |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23,300,000 | 11/7/2017 | 1.87 | 1.84 | 55.8% | 55.8% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 1,943,697 | 742,253 | 1,201,444 | 22,719 | 0 | 1,178,724 | 89.3% | 11/30/2017 |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21,180,000 | 10/3/2017 | 1.47 | 1.37 | 60.9% | 55.2% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 2,420,391 | 1,178,256 | 1,242,135 | 78,500 | 0 | 1,163,635 | 95.8% | 10/4/2017 |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | 8,940,000 | 10/3/2017 | 897,021 | 328,216 | 568,806 | 21,750 | 0 | 547,056 | 95.8% | 10/4/2017 | |||||||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | 4,500,000 | 10/3/2017 | 548,712 | 311,567 | 237,145 | 20,250 | 0 | 216,895 | 95.8% | 10/4/2017 | |||||||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | 3,730,000 | 10/3/2017 | 438,768 | 231,350 | 207,419 | 15,750 | 0 | 191,669 | 95.8% | 10/4/2017 |
A-1-7
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Grace Period Default | Grace Period Late | Grace Period at Maturity Default | Appraised Value(4) | Appraisal Date(4) | U/W NOI DSCR(3) | U/W NCF DSCR(3) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(3)(4) | LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD(3)(4) | U/W NOI Debt Yield(3) | U/W NCF Debt Yield(3) | U/W EGI | U/W Expenses | U/W NOI | U/W Replacement | U/W TI/LC(31) | U/W NCF | Occupancy Rate(26) | Occupancy as-of Date(26) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | 2,230,000 | 10/3/2017 | 308,616 | 181,016 | 127,600 | 12,000 | 0 | 115,600 | 95.8% | 10/4/2017 | |||||||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | 1,780,000 | 10/3/2017 | 227,274 | 126,108 | 101,166 | 8,750 | 0 | 92,416 | 95.8% | 10/4/2017 | |||||||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18,300,000 | 11/16/2017 | 1.41 | 1.32 | 69.7% | 53.4% | 9.8% | 9.2% | 2,189,321 | 944,819 | 1,244,502 | 27,604 | 47,553 | 1,169,346 | 83.1% | 10/1/2017 |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | 5 | 5 | 0 | 19,300,000 | 10/31/2017 | 2.53 | 2.29 | 64.2% | 52.7% | 16.2% | 14.6% | 3,905,646 | 1,897,983 | 2,007,663 | 195,282 | 0 | 1,812,380 | 73.8% | 11/02/2017 |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16,700,000 | 11/13/2017 | 1.42 | 1.38 | 73.1% | 67.2% | 9.0% | 8.7% | 1,433,528 | 337,520 | 1,096,008 | 8,751 | 22,094 | 1,065,163 | 100.0% | 12/11/2017 |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19,300,000 | 11/10/2017 | 1.67 | 1.57 | 61.7% | 52.7% | 10.2% | 9.5% | 1,254,000 | 43,415 | 1,210,585 | 13,359 | 61,393 | 1,135,833 | 100.0% | 12/21/2017 |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21,900,000 | 10/23/2017 | 2.01 | 1.88 | 53.9% | 53.9% | 9.5% | 8.8% | 1,578,334 | 461,797 | 1,116,537 | 9,648 | 64,749 | 1,042,140 | 91.5% | 8/1/2017 |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22,500,000 | 11/17/2017 | 2.01 | 1.70 | 50.0% | 44.0% | 12.6% | 10.6% | 2,811,157 | 1,398,321 | 1,412,836 | 19,077 | 201,037 | 1,192,722 | 90.9% | 11/21/2017 |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17,600,000 | 12/4/2017 | 1.66 | 1.53 | 63.6% | 52.3% | 10.7% | 9.8% | 1,690,482 | 494,768 | 1,195,714 | 19,018 | 79,516 | 1,097,180 | 77.8% | 11/30/2017 |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,125,000 | Various | 1.29 | 1.26 | 73.1% | 60.7% | 8.6% | 8.4% | 1,023,607 | 202,133 | 821,474 | 3,587 | 11,499 | 806,387 | 100.0% | 12/1/2017 |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | 4,800,000 | 10/23/2017 | 372,257 | 60,691 | 311,566 | 1,232 | 5,314 | 305,019 | 100.0% | 12/1/2017 | |||||||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | 4,525,000 | 11/7/2017 | 337,141 | 73,396 | 263,746 | 1,260 | 4,602 | 257,884 | 100.0% | 12/1/2017 | |||||||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | 3,800,000 | 10/22/2017 | 314,209 | 68,046 | 246,163 | 1,095 | 1,583 | 243,485 | 100.0% | 12/1/2017 | |||||||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18,800,000 | 11/14/2017 | 1.75 | 1.73 | 50.5% | 50.5% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 1,401,175 | 559,442 | 841,733 | 10,934 | 0 | 830,799 | 77.4% | 1/4/2018 |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16,290,000 | 11/16/2017 | 1.65 | 1.51 | 55.9% | 51.4% | 10.4% | 9.5% | 1,378,706 | 432,558 | 946,148 | 19,168 | 63,892 | 863,089 | 96.7% | 10/26/2017 |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14,440,000 | 9/28/2017 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 62.3% | 62.3% | 8.0% | 7.9% | 1,129,522 | 412,828 | 716,694 | 4,800 | 0 | 711,894 | 100.0% | 11/30/2017 |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14,000,000 | 10/25/2017 | 2.04 | 2.01 | 59.6% | 59.6% | 9.1% | 9.0% | 1,070,019 | 308,272 | 761,746 | 8,667 | 0 | 753,079 | 92.3% | 11/27/2017 |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,600,000 | 11/27/2017 | 2.09 | 1.89 | 69.9% | 57.8% | 13.7% | 12.4% | 2,563,742 | 1,455,656 | 1,108,086 | 102,550 | 0 | 1,005,537 | 73.3% | TTM 11/30/2017 |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,300,000 | 10/27/2017 | 2.10 | 1.87 | 65.0% | 53.7% | 13.7% | 12.3% | 2,897,970 | 1,801,672 | 1,096,298 | 115,919 | 0 | 980,379 | 77.2% | 11/26/2017 |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,600,000 | 11/30/2017 | 1.79 | 1.56 | 68.1% | 52.1% | 13.3% | 11.6% | 3,332,611 | 2,279,038 | 1,053,573 | 133,304 | 0 | 920,268 | 65.5% | TTM 10/31/2017 |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | 7,000,000 | 11/30/2017 | 1,964,890 | 1,310,719 | 654,171 | 78,596 | 0 | 575,575 | 69.3% | TTM 10/31/2017 | |||||||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | 4,600,000 | 11/30/2017 | 1,367,721 | 968,319 | 399,402 | 54,709 | 0 | 344,693 | 61.9% | TTM 10/31/2017 | |||||||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10,600,000 | 8/29/2017 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 73.8% | 65.0% | 8.3% | 8.1% | 1,011,201 | 362,117 | 649,084 | 15,250 | 0 | 633,834 | 98.4% | 10/1/2017 |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14,100,000 | 12/6/2017 | 1.96 | 1.77 | 53.2% | 48.1% | 15.1% | 13.6% | 2,745,215 | 1,612,349 | 1,132,866 | 109,809 | 0 | 1,023,057 | 76.9% | TTM 11/30/2017 |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | 7,300,000 | 12/6/2017 | 1,440,644 | 790,707 | 649,936 | 57,626 | 0 | 592,311 | 80.1% | TTM 11/30/2017 | |||||||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | 6,800,000 | 12/6/2017 | 1,304,571 | 821,641 | 482,930 | 52,183 | 0 | 430,747 | 73.7% | TTM 11/30/2017 | |||||||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,400,000 | 11/8/2017 | 1.57 | 1.53 | 60.5% | 51.9% | 9.7% | 9.5% | 1,027,248 | 297,302 | 729,946 | 3,173 | 15,866 | 710,906 | 100.0% | 12/1/2017 |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,050,000 | 11/30/2017 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 72.8% | 65.4% | 9.5% | 9.1% | 1,297,948 | 601,950 | 695,997 | 30,500 | 0 | 665,497 | 97.4% | 10/31/2017 |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,300,000 | 7/21/2017 | 1.55 | 1.52 | 69.9% | 59.8% | 9.5% | 9.3% | 972,800 | 289,911 | 682,889 | 12,988 | 0 | 669,902 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,200,000 | 11/3/2017 | 1.37 | 1.35 | 62.5% | 62.5% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 607,879 | 118,087 | 489,793 | 3,000 | 4,992 | 481,801 | 95.1% | 11/30/2017 |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | 4,200,000 | 11/3/2017 | 247,531 | 49,811 | 197,720 | 750 | 2,492 | 194,478 | 95.1% | 11/30/2017 | |||||||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | 3,700,000 | 11/3/2017 | 196,200 | 31,430 | 164,770 | 1,500 | 0 | 163,270 | 95.1% | 11/30/2017 | |||||||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | 3,300,000 | 11/3/2017 | 164,148 | 36,846 | 127,302 | 750 | 2,500 | 124,052 | 95.1% | 11/30/2017 | |||||||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,650,000 | 12/11/2017 | 1.80 | 1.69 | 61.5% | 55.4% | 11.3% | 10.7% | 968,079 | 225,711 | 742,368 | 6,611 | 38,014 | 697,742 | 92.0% | 12/31/2017 |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,100,000 | 10/26/2017 | 1.71 | 1.57 | 51.7% | 48.3% | 12.4% | 11.4% | 1,671,900 | 898,262 | 773,638 | 62,750 | 0 | 710,888 | 90.4% | 11/1/2017 |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,240,000 | 12/11/2017 | 1.59 | 1.57 | 60.1% | 60.1% | 8.3% | 8.1% | 853,772 | 345,891 | 507,881 | 8,182 | 0 | 499,699 | 94.8% | 11/30/2017 |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15,260,000 | 11/21/2017 | 3.46 | 3.42 | 39.3% | 39.3% | 15.4% | 15.2% | 1,281,424 | 359,657 | 921,767 | 10,661 | 0 | 911,106 | 93.6% | 12/21/2017 |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,100,000 | 11/3/2017 | 1.64 | 1.46 | 71.3% | 63.0% | 10.5% | 9.3% | 1,020,086 | 413,164 | 606,921 | 11,644 | 58,220 | 537,057 | 94.6% | 9/30/2017 |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,900,000 | 11/30/2017 | 1.76 | 1.62 | 61.7% | 50.7% | 11.2% | 10.4% | 1,171,487 | 553,455 | 618,032 | 46,859 | 0 | 571,173 | 73.5% | 11/30/2017 |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,690,000 | 10/27/2017 | 1.48 | 1.45 | 52.8% | 43.4% | 9.5% | 9.3% | 781,518 | 346,595 | 434,923 | 9,168 | 0 | 425,755 | 80.8% | 10/31/2017 |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,700,000 | 12/1/2017 | 2.03 | 1.60 | 58.4% | 47.7% | 12.7% | 10.0% | 1,871,737 | 1,298,619 | 573,118 | 17,134 | 104,978 | 451,007 | 91.6% | 1/12/2018 |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,000,000 | 10/13/2017 | 1.63 | 1.50 | 75.0% | 62.0% | 10.7% | 9.9% | 678,864 | 196,006 | 482,858 | 13,552 | 23,433 | 445,873 | 100.0% | 12/1/2017 |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,640,000 | 11/30/2017 | 2.42 | 2.33 | 34.4% | 34.4% | 9.9% | 9.5% | 701,505 | 306,221 | 395,284 | 15,084 | 0 | 380,199 | 93.8% | 9/13/2017 |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5,530,000 | 1/7/2017 | 1.53 | 1.37 | 71.7% | 59.9% | 10.2% | 9.1% | 712,654 | 307,423 | 405,232 | 9,369 | 33,105 | 362,757 | 100.0% | 1/12/2018 |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5,000,000 | 11/5/2017 | 1.70 | 1.56 | 75.0% | 61.9% | 11.1% | 10.1% | 516,920 | 101,526 | 415,394 | 4,545 | 30,300 | 380,549 | 100.0% | 1/8/2018 |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5,675,000 | 11/20/2017 | 1.97 | 1.95 | 57.3% | 57.3% | 9.7% | 9.6% | 318,861 | 4,911 | 313,950 | 2,223 | 0 | 311,727 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,550,000 | 11/8/2017 | 1.43 | 1.32 | 69.2% | 60.5% | 9.6% | 8.9% | 416,539 | 112,895 | 303,644 | 3,000 | 19,094 | 281,550 | 100.0% | 1/1/2018 |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4,875,000 | 12/5/2017 | 1.97 | 1.95 | 57.4% | 57.4% | 9.7% | 9.6% | 274,726 | 4,470 | 270,256 | 2,223 | 0 | 268,033 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4,770,000 | 11/15/2017 | 2.04 | 2.03 | 57.5% | 57.5% | 10.0% | 9.9% | 278,948 | 4,512 | 274,436 | 1,575 | 0 | 272,861 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,350,000 | 10/10/2017 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 70.0% | 70.0% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 87,977 | 2,639 | 85,338 | 1,354 | 0 | 83,984 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,325,000 | 7/30/2017 | 1.71 | 1.68 | 70.0% | 70.0% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 86,287 | 2,589 | 83,699 | 1,365 | 0 | 82,334 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,280,000 | 10/30/2017 | 1.72 | 1.69 | 70.0% | 70.0% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 83,565 | 2,507 | 81,058 | 1,365 | 0 | 79,693 | 100.0% | 2/1/2018 |
A-1-8
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Most Recent Operating Statement Date | Most Recent EGI | Most Recent Expenses | Most Recent NOI | Second Most Recent Operating Statement Date | Second Most Recent EGI | Second Most Recent Expenses | Second Most Recent NOI | Third Most Recent Operating Statement Date | Third Most Recent EGI | Third Most Recent Expenses | Third Most Recent NOI | Largest Tenant Name(11)(12)(13) | Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Largest Tenant % of NRA | Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | TTM 9/30/2017 | 37,067,823 | 11,060,915 | 26,006,908 | 12/31/2016 | 37,394,183 | 10,389,232 | 27,004,951 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | Various |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | TTM 9/30/2017 | 4,459,736 | 912,039 | 3,547,697 | 12/31/2016 | 4,371,471 | 855,965 | 3,515,506 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | HomeGoods | 25,000 | 13.9% | 07/31/2019 |
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | TTM 9/30/2017 | 3,238,890 | 825,566 | 2,413,324 | 12/31/2016 | 3,444,240 | 861,289 | 2,582,951 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ACADEMY | 71,914 | 34.9% | 02/28/2030 |
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | TTM 9/30/2017 | 3,797,966 | 695,223 | 3,102,743 | 12/31/2016 | 3,669,121 | 634,734 | 3,034,387 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Best Buy | 57,726 | 28.2% | 01/31/2025 |
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | TTM 9/30/2017 | 4,311,414 | 2,142,753 | 2,168,661 | 12/31/2016 | 3,844,916 | 1,923,822 | 1,921,094 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N ELDER BEERMAN | 101,840 | 32.0% | 10/31/2019 |
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,963,729 | 996,728 | 1,967,001 | 12/31/2016 | 3,173,257 | 915,773 | 2,257,484 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Hobby Lobby | 55,000 | 22.5% | 08/31/2019 |
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,898,647 | 766,937 | 2,131,710 | 12/31/2016 | 2,753,067 | 685,622 | 2,067,445 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | DEVELOPERS REALTY CORP | 104,155 | 46.1% | 01/31/2047 |
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | TTM 9/30/2017 | 4,508,366 | 1,551,760 | 2,956,606 | 12/31/2016 | 4,593,896 | 1,532,682 | 3,061,214 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | TOYS R US | 60,687 | 29.3% | 1/31/2021 |
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,099,325 | 569,861 | 1,529,464 | 12/31/2016 | 2,096,136 | 545,442 | 1,550,694 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Kohl’s | 88,408 | 62.0% | 04/30/2025 |
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,451,691 | 721,631 | 1,730,060 | 12/31/2016 | 2,872,251 | 664,277 | 2,207,974 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | HomeGoods | 24,000 | 17.1% | 09/30/2024 |
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,441,135 | 599,488 | 1,841,647 | 12/31/2016 | 2,775,847 | 687,286 | 2,088,561 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | HOME DEPOT | 102,962 | 44.0% | 01/31/2019 |
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,324,971 | 733,086 | 1,591,885 | 12/31/2016 | 2,210,704 | 595,279 | 1,615,425 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | JO ANN FABRIC AND CRAFT STOR | 35,759 | 24.7% | 01/31/2021 |
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | TTM 9/30/2017 | 1,571,953 | 545,843 | 1,026,110 | 12/31/2016 | 1,589,277 | 487,061 | 1,102,216 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Beall’s Department Store | 84,146 | 49.1% | 04/30/2020 |
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | TTM 9/30/2017 | 20,065,147 | 9,305,710 | 10,759,437 | 12/31/2016 | 18,720,741 | 9,192,277 | 9,528,464 | 12/31/2015 | 15,207,112 | 9,286,785 | 5,920,327 | Hammer Packaging Corporation | 268,109 | 8.0% | 12/31/2018 |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | TTM 11/30/2017 | 24,369,051 | 13,056,123 | 11,312,928 | 12/31/2016 | 18,065,142 | 11,704,653 | 6,360,488 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Kronos Incorporated | 505,664 | 38.3% | 2/6/2029 |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | 12/31/2017 | 9,193,964 | 33,691 | 9,160,273 | 12/31/2016 | 9,058,093 | 41,626 | 9,016,467 | 12/31/2015 | 8,924,229 | 22,724 | 8,901,505 | Academy Sports | 1,500,596 | 100.0% | 01/31/2027 |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | TTM 10/31/2017 | 7,562,142 | 2,011,114 | 5,551,028 | 12/31/2016 | 7,321,976 | 1,962,057 | 5,359,919 | 12/31/2015 | 7,221,230 | 2,078,962 | 5,142,268 | Hobby Lobby and Mardel | 101,760 | 27.0% | 9/30/2030 |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | TTM 9/30/2017 | 7,700,803 | 4,190,109 | 3,510,694 | 12/31/2016 | 7,004,260 | 3,906,279 | 3,097,981 | 12/31/2015 | 9,609,883 | 4,488,167 | 5,121,716 | Various | Various | N/A | Various |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | TTM 9/30/2017 | 1,840,740 | 1,723,826 | 116,914 | 12/31/2016 | 1,899,318 | 1,561,503 | 337,815 | 12/31/2015 | 5,056,985 | 2,093,325 | 2,963,660 | RBC Capital Markets LLC | 52,787 | 32.9% | 7/31/2028 |
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,132,159 | 855,476 | 1,276,683 | 12/31/2016 | 1,551,286 | 763,781 | 787,505 | 12/31/2015 | 1,587,033 | 816,106 | 770,927 | Fairleigh Dickinson University | 67,924 | 100.0% | 6/30/2028 |
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | TTM 9/30/2017 | 2,095,776 | 867,727 | 1,228,049 | 12/31/2016 | 1,912,231 | 850,511 | 1,061,720 | 12/31/2015 | 1,526,724 | 818,708 | 708,016 | Schenk Price Smith & King LLP | 38,519 | 56.5% | 8/31/2022 |
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | TTM 9/30/2017 | 1,632,128 | 743,080 | 889,048 | 12/31/2016 | 1,641,425 | 730,484 | 910,941 | 12/31/2015 | 1,439,141 | 760,028 | 679,113 | Sherman Wells Sylvester & Stam | 20,213 | 35.0% | 4/30/2024 |
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 12/31/2017 | 10,581,073 | 3,943,696 | 6,637,378 | 12/31/2016 | 10,715,569 | 3,699,797 | 7,015,772 | 12/31/2015 | 9,689,543 | 3,703,063 | 5,986,480 | Clubsource at City Center | 56,800 | 23.1% | 11/30/2020 |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | TTM 11/30/2017 | 5,101,829 | 1,938,523 | 3,163,306 | 12/31/2016 | 4,373,833 | 1,736,813 | 2,637,021 | 12/31/2015 | 4,095,958 | 1,542,828 | 2,553,130 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | Various |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | FedEx Ground | 141,582 | 100.0% | 6/30/2027 |
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Chili’s | 6,039 | 100.0% | 10/31/2027 |
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | FedEx Ground | 53,739 | 100.0% | 5/31/2026 |
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | FedEx Ground | 29,246 | 100.0% | 6/30/2027 |
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Chili’s | 6,039 | 100.0% | 10/31/2027 |
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bridgestone HOSEpower | 20,900 | 100.0% | 6/30/2030 |
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Sonic Drive In | 1,256 | 100.0% | 6/30/2032 |
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bridgestone HOSEpower | 19,979 | 100.0% | 9/30/2029 |
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bridgestone HOSEpower | 25,125 | 100.0% | 10/31/2029 |
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bridgestone HOSEpower | 12,000 | 100.0% | 12/31/2031 |
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Jo-Ann Fabrics | 18,000 | 100.0% | 1/31/2025 |
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Tractor Supply | 25,612 | 100.0% | 8/31/2026 |
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,100 | 100.0% | 7/31/2029 |
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Sonic Drive In | 1,621 | 100.0% | 6/30/2032 |
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Tractor Supply | 25,612 | 100.0% | 1/31/2027 |
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,100 | 100.0% | 8/31/2029 |
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,026 | 100.0% | 7/31/2029 |
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,100 | 100.0% | 8/31/2030 |
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,002 | 100.0% | 2/28/2030 |
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,100 | 100.0% | 11/30/2028 |
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,026 | 100.0% | 10/31/2028 |
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,026 | 100.0% | 7/31/2029 |
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | TTM 11/30/2017 | 10,131,179 | 5,371,053 | 4,760,126 | 12/31/2016 | 10,285,451 | 5,347,927 | 4,937,524 | 12/31/2015 | 9,944,840 | 5,229,120 | 4,715,720 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | 627,526 | 100.0% | Various |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | TREMEC | 127,105 | 100.0% | 8/31/2027 |
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Cummins, Inc. | 58,546 | 100.0% | 5/31/2025 |
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bridgestone Tire | 48,300 | 100.0% | 7/31/2027 |
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | NSA Industries - 210 | 87,100 | 100.0% | 10/23/2032 |
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | NSA Industries - 815 | 84,949 | 100.0% | 10/23/2032 |
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | GKN Aerospace | 97,864 | 100.0% | 12/31/2026 |
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | NSA Industries - 12 | 82,862 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | NSA Industries - 911 | 40,800 | 100.0% | 10/23/2032 |
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | BlueLinx Corporation | 2,307,835 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | BlueLinx Corporation | 680,252 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | BlueLinx Corporation | 489,950 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | BlueLinx Corporation | 585,637 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | BlueLinx Corporation | 551,996 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | GoDaddy | 180,480 | 100.0% | 12/31/2027 |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | TTM 10/31/2017 | 2,709,638 | 1,077,106 | 1,632,532 | 12/31/2016 | 2,544,409 | 995,955 | 1,548,454 | 12/31/2015 | 2,502,019 | 989,659 | 1,512,359 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,867,209 | 958,396 | 1,908,813 | 12/31/2016 | 2,670,398 | 986,401 | 1,683,996 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Catepillar, Inc. | 96,491 | 88.9% | 2/28/2030 |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | TTM 11/30/2017 | 4,517,758 | 2,151,742 | 2,366,016 | 12/31/2016 | 4,476,097 | 2,145,137 | 2,330,960 | 12/31/2015 | 4,174,164 | 2,072,508 | 2,101,656 | Wilson Learning Corporation | 20,476 | 9.4% | 7/31/2020 |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | TTM 7/31/2017 | 2,281,986 | 222,399 | 2,059,587 | 12/31/2016 | 2,109,858 | 208,906 | 1,900,952 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Antiquarian Traders, Inc. | 72,000 | 28.1% | 1/30/2024 |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,080,167 | 63,248 | 2,016,919 | 12/31/2016 | 2,071,789 | 48,640 | 2,023,149 | 12/31/2015 | 2,072,861 | 39,035 | 2,033,826 | General Electric Company | 191,500 | 100.0% | 10/31/2027 |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | T6 10/31/2017 | 951,527 | 193,747 | 757,779 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | MemorialCare Medical | 25,994 | 58.4% | 4/30/2032 |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Flix Brewhouse | 37,557 | 63.5% | 11/30/2031 |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | 12/31/2032 |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | 41,124 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | South Bend Orthopedics Orthopedic Associates, Inc. | 36,269 | 100.0% | 12/31/2032 |
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | TTM 6/30/2017 | 25,464,312 | 13,142,223 | 12,322,089 | 12/31/2016 | 22,282,785 | 12,726,214 | 9,556,571 | 12/31/2015 | 22,932,055 | 12,878,848 | 10,053,207 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | TTM 6/30/2017 | 21,564,780 | 10,594,493 | 10,970,286 | 12/31/2016 | 18,331,288 | 10,283,642 | 8,047,646 | 12/31/2015 | 18,642,769 | 10,510,120 | 8,132,649 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | TTM 6/30/2017 | 3,899,533 | 2,547,730 | 1,351,803 | 12/31/2016 | 3,951,498 | 2,442,573 | 1,508,925 | 12/31/2015 | 4,289,286 | 2,368,729 | 1,920,558 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | TTM 10/31/2017 | 2,899,284 | 1,503,917 | 1,395,367 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | Various |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,776,509 | 789,787 | 986,722 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yahee Technologies Corp. | 104,000 | 34.2% | 12/31/2021 |
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | TTM 10/31/2017 | 392,365 | 285,396 | 106,969 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Nosco, Inc. | 94,492 | 53.8% | 11/30/2022 |
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | TTM 10/31/2017 | 730,410 | 428,734 | 301,676 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Helm Group, Inc. | 86,268 | 54.7% | 01/31/2024 |
24 | Loan | Concord Place | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,471,635 | 1,259,332 | 1,212,303 | 12/31/2016 | 2,405,988 | 1,220,081 | 1,185,908 | 12/31/2015 | 2,461,742 | 1,194,979 | 1,266,763 | CEA Global Education | 17,416 | 13.0% | 9/30/2020 |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,386,167 | 735,090 | 1,651,077 | 12/31/2016 | 2,368,653 | 754,047 | 1,614,606 | 12/31/2015 | 2,241,956 | 631,320 | 1,610,636 | Shoppers Food Warehouse | 66,870 | 63.9% | 6/30/2025 |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,943,697 | 725,305 | 1,218,392 | 12/31/2016 | 1,906,664 | 615,015 | 1,291,649 | 12/31/2015 | 1,793,295 | 552,806 | 1,240,489 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | TTM 7/31/2017 | 2,426,116 | 1,196,808 | 1,229,308 | 12/31/2016 | 2,462,437 | 1,197,932 | 1,264,505 | 12/31/2015 | 2,422,422 | 1,292,236 | 1,130,186 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | TTM 7/31/2017 | 900,949 | 344,339 | 556,610 | 12/31/2016 | 946,119 | 424,313 | 521,805 | 12/31/2015 | 892,809 | 382,576 | 510,233 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | TTM 7/31/2017 | 530,424 | 218,170 | 312,254 | 12/31/2016 | 526,186 | 227,306 | 298,879 | 12/31/2015 | 526,923 | 217,245 | 309,678 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | TTM 7/31/2017 | 458,390 | 410,617 | 47,773 | 12/31/2016 | 457,052 | 378,520 | 78,532 | 12/31/2015 | 477,746 | 472,224 | 5,521 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
A-1-9
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Most Recent Operating Statement Date | Most Recent EGI | Most Recent Expenses | Most Recent NOI | Second Most Recent Operating Statement Date | Second Most Recent EGI | Second Most Recent Expenses | Second Most Recent NOI | Third Most Recent Operating Statement Date | Third Most Recent EGI | Third Most Recent Expenses | Third Most Recent NOI | Largest Tenant Name(11)(12)(13) | Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Largest Tenant % of NRA | Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | TTM 7/31/2017 | 313,811 | 110,845 | 202,966 | 12/31/2016 | 308,848 | 102,520 | 206,328 | 12/31/2015 | 299,653 | 124,263 | 175,390 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | TTM 7/31/2017 | 222,542 | 112,837 | 109,705 | 12/31/2016 | 224,233 | 65,272 | 158,961 | 12/31/2015 | 225,291 | 95,927 | 129,364 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,229,661 | 904,936 | 324,726 | 12/31/2016 | 631,465 | 441,556 | 189,909 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Fulton County | 47,882 | 34.7% | 12/28/2028 |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | TTM 12/31/2017 | 3,905,646 | 1,888,640 | 2,017,006 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | YTD 9/30/2017 | 1,422,038 | 316,847 | 1,105,191 | 12/31/2016 | 1,457,622 | 328,287 | 1,129,335 | 12/31/2015 | 1,392,306 | 322,208 | 1,070,098 | Giant Foods | 54,339 | 93.1% | 5/31/2024 |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | TTM 9/30/2017 | 1,286,667 | 25,599 | 1,261,068 | 12/31/2016 | 1,300,000 | 35,444 | 1,264,556 | 12/31/2015 | 1,293,333 | 35,298 | 1,258,035 | Kohl’s | 89,060 | 100.0% | 1/31/2028 |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | TTM 9/30/2017 | 1,351,446 | 490,858 | 860,588 | 12/31/2016 | 1,177,788 | 485,320 | 692,468 | 12/31/2015 | 1,045,923 | 462,139 | 583,784 | VIP Urgent Care | 7,100 | 14.7% | 5/31/2026 |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | TTM 10/31/2017 | 2,716,264 | 1,406,003 | 1,310,261 | 12/31/2016 | 2,750,795 | 1,371,034 | 1,379,761 | 12/31/2015 | 2,517,328 | 1,259,805 | 1,257,524 | International City Bank, N.A. | 14,878 | 13.3% | 5/31/2025 |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,801,418 | 429,023 | 1,372,396 | 12/31/2016 | 1,784,653 | 438,327 | 1,346,326 | 12/31/2015 | 1,789,722 | 474,556 | 1,315,166 | Barnes & Noble Booksellers | 36,139 | 38.0% | 1/31/2022 |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | Various | 920,992 | 194,521 | 726,471 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | Various |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Aspen Dental | 3,500 | 42.6% | 11/30/2027 |
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | TTM 9/30/2017 | 344,177 | 76,442 | 267,735 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Mattress Firm | 5,000 | 59.5% | 1/31/2026 |
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | TTM 9/30/2017 | 576,815 | 118,079 | 458,736 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Mattress Firm | 5,000 | 68.5% | 9/30/2026 |
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | TTM 12/31/2017 | 1,276,436 | 454,782 | 821,654 | 12/31/2016 | 1,093,230 | 401,286 | 691,944 | 12/31/2015 | 1,006,219 | 384,625 | 621,595 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Academy Sports | 62,943 | 49.3% | 7/31/2032 |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,115,665 | 389,742 | 725,924 | 12/31/2016 | 1,107,657 | 379,677 | 727,980 | 12/31/2015 | 1,179,128 | 404,520 | 774,608 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,070,019 | 309,223 | 760,796 | 12/31/2016 | 1,003,417 | 307,702 | 695,716 | 12/31/2015 | 939,813 | 292,303 | 647,510 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,563,742 | 1,443,591 | 1,120,151 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,897,970 | 1,762,466 | 1,135,504 | 12/31/2016 | 2,564,335 | 1,604,699 | 959,636 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | TTM 10/31/2017 | 3,315,931 | 2,282,533 | 1,033,399 | 12/31/2016 | 3,132,841 | 2,209,039 | 923,802 | 12/31/2015 | 3,026,961 | 2,137,539 | 889,421 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,964,890 | 1,317,922 | 646,967 | 12/31/2016 | 1,943,150 | 1,299,696 | 643,454 | 12/31/2015 | 1,817,968 | 1,250,732 | 567,236 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,351,042 | 964,611 | 386,431 | 12/31/2016 | 1,189,691 | 909,343 | 280,348 | 12/31/2015 | 1,208,993 | 886,807 | 322,186 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | TTM 11/30/2017 | 2,798,238 | 1,679,713 | 1,118,525 | 12/31/2016 | 2,495,003 | 1,440,656 | 1,054,347 | 12/31/2015 | 2,623,581 | 1,368,929 | 1,254,652 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,529,490 | 854,943 | 674,548 | 12/31/2016 | 1,222,660 | 716,486 | 506,174 | 12/31/2015 | 1,331,374 | 676,225 | 655,149 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,268,748 | 824,771 | 443,977 | 12/31/2016 | 1,272,343 | 724,170 | 548,173 | 12/31/2015 | 1,292,207 | 692,704 | 599,503 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Panera Bread | 4,288 | 20.3% | 12/31/2026 |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,305,831 | 631,979 | 673,852 | 12/31/2016 | 1,255,440 | 667,044 | 588,396 | 12/31/2015 | 1,216,268 | 638,687 | 577,581 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Kohl’s | 86,854 | 100.0% | 2/3/2030 |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | TTM 11/30/2017 | 590,320 | 118,503 | 471,817 | 12/31/2016 | 599,981 | 104,775 | 495,206 | 12/31/2015 | 547,004 | 117,811 | 429,193 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | TTM 11/30/2017 | 239,714 | 50,546 | 189,168 | 12/31/2016 | 236,642 | 42,062 | 194,580 | 12/31/2015 | 215,729 | 52,003 | 163,726 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | TTM 11/30/2017 | 174,470 | 30,982 | 143,488 | 12/31/2016 | 174,306 | 31,545 | 142,761 | 12/31/2015 | 167,700 | 34,077 | 133,623 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | TTM 11/30/2017 | 176,136 | 36,974 | 139,162 | 12/31/2016 | 189,033 | 31,168 | 157,865 | 12/31/2015 | 163,575 | 31,731 | 131,844 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | TTM 10/31/2017 | 999,115 | 211,914 | 787,201 | 12/31/2016 | 901,110 | 206,046 | 695,063 | 12/31/2015 | 878,431 | 176,733 | 701,698 | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | 5,684 | 17.2% | 12/19/2022 |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,569,348 | 804,778 | 764,570 | 12/31/2016 | 1,495,363 | 775,026 | 720,337 | 12/31/2015 | 1,453,708 | 758,406 | 695,302 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | TTM 11/30/2017 | 821,882 | 239,991 | 581,892 | 12/31/2016 | 763,192 | 274,402 | 488,790 | 12/31/2015 | 578,136 | 283,963 | 294,173 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | 12/31/2016 | 1,204,871 | 350,213 | 854,658 | 12/31/2015 | 1,115,852 | 334,024 | 781,828 | 12/31/2014 | 1,060,291 | 343,586 | 716,705 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | TTM 8/31/2017 | 921,006 | 390,637 | 530,368 | 12/31/2016 | 878,541 | 382,452 | 496,089 | 12/31/2015 | 769,795 | 370,650 | 399,145 | dd’s Discount (Ross Dress for Less) | 22,839 | 29.4% | 1/31/2022 |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | TTM 11/30/2017 | 1,171,487 | 562,835 | 608,652 | 6/30/2017 | 1,202,991 | 634,441 | 568,551 | 12/31/2016 | 1,043,853 | 606,505 | 437,348 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | TTM 11/30/2017 | 781,518 | 340,542 | 440,976 | 12/31/2016 | 668,224 | 311,398 | 356,826 | 12/31/2015 | 536,038 | 284,973 | 251,065 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | TTM 10/31/2017 | 1,834,854 | 1,370,193 | 464,661 | 12/31/2016 | 1,815,008 | 1,281,886 | 533,123 | 12/31/2015 | 1,827,771 | 1,199,540 | 628,231 | Department of Children and Families | 44,435 | 51.9% | 8/24/2027 |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | TTM 11/30/2017 | 692,076 | 214,249 | 477,827 | 12/31/2016 | 694,376 | 207,963 | 486,413 | 12/31/2015 | 690,086 | 234,106 | 455,980 | Mac’s Fresh Foods | 30,400 | 44.9% | 7/31/2026 |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | TTM 11/30/2017 | 682,260 | 259,926 | 422,334 | 12/31/2016 | 665,903 | 309,505 | 356,397 | 12/31/2015 | 590,205 | 284,683 | 305,523 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | TTM 9/30/2017 | 754,352 | 292,381 | 461,971 | 12/31/2016 | 742,919 | 289,961 | 452,958 | 12/31/2015 | 732,686 | 280,785 | 451,901 | Tractor Supply Company | 31,745 | 50.8% | 12/31/2025 |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 12/31/2017 | 566,196 | 109,455 | 456,741 | 12/31/2016 | 483,689 | 98,928 | 384,761 | 12/31/2015 | 465,594 | 90,852 | 374,742 | King Buffett | 6,000 | 19.8% | 10/31/2022 |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | TTM 12/31/2017 | 326,500 | 0 | 326,500 | 12/31/2016 | 326,500 | 0 | 326,500 | 12/31/2015 | 326,500 | 0 | 326,500 | Walgreen Co. | 14,820 | 100.0% | 7/31/2082 |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | TTM 11/30/2017 | 408,954 | 115,485 | 293,469 | 12/31/2016 | 416,110 | 115,735 | 300,375 | 12/31/2015 | 424,702 | 111,776 | 312,926 | America’s Best Eyeglasses | 3,360 | 16.8% | 4/30/2020 |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | TTM 12/31/2017 | 281,000 | 0 | 281,000 | 12/31/2016 | 281,000 | 0 | 281,000 | 12/31/2015 | 281,000 | 0 | 281,000 | Walgreen Co. | 14,820 | 100.0% | 10/31/2081 |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | TTM 12/31/2017 | 286,000 | 0 | 286,000 | 12/31/2016 | 286,000 | 0 | 286,000 | 12/31/2015 | 286,000 | 0 | 286,000 | Walgreen Co. | 10,500 | 100.0% | 7/31/2082 |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,026 | 100.0% | 8/31/2032 |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,100 | 100.0% | 6/30/2032 |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Dollar General | 9,100 | 100.0% | 7/30/2032 |
A-1-10
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Second Largest Tenant Name(10)(11)(12)(13)(25) | Second Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Second Largest Tenant % of NRA | Second Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Third Largest Tenant Name(10)(11)(13)(20)(24) | Third Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Third Largest Tenant % of NRA | Third Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Fourth Largest Tenant Name(11)(12)(13)(25) | Fourth Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Fourth Largest Tenant % of NRA |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | Petsmart | 22,400 | 12.5% | 05/31/2023 | Office Depot | 17,000 | 9.5% | 01/31/2020 | Pier 1 Imports | 10,800 | 6.0% |
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | Aldi | 24,067 | 11.7% | 05/31/2028 | LIQUOR BARN | 22,000 | 10.7% | 05/31/2025 | MICHAELS STORES INC. | 17,005 | 8.3% |
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | Seafood City | 42,618 | 20.8% | 02/28/2022 | Ross Dress For Less | 31,847 | 15.6% | 01/31/2025 | Party City | 19,331 | 9.4% |
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | KOHL’S | 80,731 | 25.4% | 01/31/2020 | MARSHALLS | 29,500 | 9.3% | 05/31/2026 | PETSMART | 24,844 | 7.8% |
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | Ross Dress For Less | 30,187 | 12.4% | 01/31/2022 | Bed, Bath and Beyond, Inc. | 22,285 | 9.1% | 01/31/2022 | Old Navy Clothing Co | 20,000 | 8.2% |
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | TJ MAXX #354 | 30,000 | 13.3% | 10/31/2026 | BED BATH & BEYOND | 29,427 | 13.0% | 04/30/2024 | SHOE CARNIVAL #207 | 17,317 | 7.7% |
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | BARNES & NOBLE BOOKSTORE | 35,475 | 17.1% | 02/28/2021 | THE CONTAINER STORE | 22,817 | 11.0% | 01/31/2023 | OFFICE DEPOT | 21,075 | 10.2% |
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | Petsmart | 19,107 | 13.4% | 01/31/2025 | Shoe Show | 4,288 | 3.0% | 11/30/2019 | Rent-A-Center | 3,715 | 2.6% |
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | Michaels Stores | 17,497 | 12.4% | 02/28/2025 | Ulta Salon | 10,015 | 7.1% | 08/31/2024 | Pier 1 Imports | 9,500 | 6.8% |
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | BEST BUY | 45,753 | 19.6% | 01/31/2023 | GUITAR CENTER | 15,200 | 6.5% | 10/31/2025 | FURNITURE BUY CONSIGNMENT C | 6,812 | 2.9% |
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | BED BATH & BEYOND | 26,274 | 18.2% | 01/31/2023 | PARTY CITY | 21,000 | 14.5% | 08/31/2022 | OFFICE DEPOT | 19,187 | 13.3% |
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | Best Buy Stores, L.P. | 51,868 | 30.3% | 01/31/2021 | Jo-Ann Stores, LLC | 19,100 | 11.1% | 01/31/2021 | Fantastic Sams | 2,560 | 1.5% |
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | Harris Corporation (formerly ITT Space Systems) | 260,108 | 7.8% | 12/31/2022;8/31/2020;4/30/2027 | Kodak Alaris | 248,184 | 7.4% | 12/31/2028 | Maximus | 195,450 | 5.8% |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | Verizon New England | 314,981 | 23.9% | Various | Arris Technology, Inc. | 143,594 | 10.9% | 4/30/2027 | Vantiv eCommerce, LLC | 63,924 | 4.8% |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | Marshall’s | 32,228 | 8.5% | 5/31/2021 | Stein Mart | 28,157 | 7.5% | 3/31/2020 | Office Depot | 26,520 | 7.0% |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | Level 3 Communication, LLC | 34,908 | 21.7% | 4/30/2020 | Santander Bank, N.A. | 30,563 | 19.0% | 10/31/2027 | CCG Holdings, LLC - Clearview | 12,254 | 7.6% |
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | Phoenix Power Group, Inc. | 8,472 | 12.4% | 4/22/2023 | Profoto US Inc. | 7,436 | 10.9% | 10/31/2022 | Manufactuers & Traders Trust | 7,399 | 10.9% |
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | McCusker Anselmi Rosen Carvell | 20,211 | 35.0% | 2/28/2021 | Sun National Bank | 9,479 | 16.4% | 5/31/2020 | Wealth Continuum Group | 5,815 | 10.1% |
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | Chevron Federal Credit Union, a Federal Credit Union | 34,592 | 14.1% | 6/30/2022 | Kaiser Foundation Health Plan | 16,991 | 6.9% | 5/31/2028 | OpTerra Energy Services, Inc. | 16,830 | 6.8% |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. | 12,007 | 11.1% | 4/21/2023 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | Federal Air Marshall Service | 19,874 | 9.2% | 1/31/2019 | Microedge, LLC | 19,859 | 9.2% | 12/31/2021 | T-Mobile Central, LLC | 18,361 | 8.5% |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | ETO Doors Corp. | 45,991 | 18.0% | 4/30/2032 | Suk J. Go, individual, AND Monkey Ride Jeans Inc. | 22,800 | 8.9% | 6/30/2020 | Noble Textiles | 19,400 | 7.6% |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | Fresenius Medical Care | 13,000 | 29.2% | 3/31/2032 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | Village Pizza | 3,828 | 6.5% | 8/31/2027 | The Mattress Store | 3,000 | 5.1% | 8/31/2023 | Nusenda Credit Union | 2,800 | 4.7% |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | Sheet Metal Werks, Inc. | 79,692 | 26.2% | 09/30/2025 | F.H. Paschen, S.N. Nielsen & Associates | 63,410 | 20.8% | 09/30/2023 | Advance Mechanical Systems, Inc. | 46,341 | 15.2% |
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | Tosca Services, LLC | 81,155 | 46.2% | 02/28/2021 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | Tibor Machine Products | 71,325 | 45.3% | 02/28/2025 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
24 | Loan | Concord Place | Home Health Agency-AZ Inc. | 16,461 | 12.2% | 10/31/2020 | Hannay Investment Properties | 10,284 | 7.6% | 12/31/2029 | Mello & Ponaman Enterprises, LLC | 9,817 | 7.3% |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | Walgreens | 14,564 | 13.9% | 7/31/2027 | Panera Bread | 4,953 | 4.7% | 8/31/2020 | Massage Envy | 3,520 | 3.4% |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
A-1-11
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Second Largest Tenant Name(10)(11)(12)(13)(25) | Second Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Second Largest Tenant % of NRA | Second Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Third Largest Tenant Name(10)(11)(13)(20)(24) | Third Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Third Largest Tenant % of NRA | Third Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Fourth Largest Tenant Name(11)(12)(13)(25) | Fourth Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Fourth Largest Tenant % of NRA |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | Grady Health Systems | 44,204 | 32.0% | 3/1/2030 | Ebrik LLC | 3,642 | 2.6% | 7/31/2023 | Milk & Tea | 2,775 | 2.0% |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | GameStop | 1,600 | 2.7% | 4/30/2018 | Great Clips | 1,200 | 2.1% | 2/28/2021 | Quakertown Cleaners | 1,200 | 2.1% |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | Gelt, Inc. | 4,500 | 9.3% | 11/30/2029 | Venetian Furniture Gallery | 4,100 | 8.5% | MTM | Michael Joseph Furle Salon | 4,000 | 8.3% |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | Jackson Jade & Associates | 10,059 | 9.0% | 5/31/2019 | Novogradac & Company LLP | 9,976 | 8.9% | 7/31/2018 | Mahoney Law Group | 7,471 | 6.7% |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles | 6,750 | 7.1% | 5/31/2018 | Pompanoosuc Mills Corp. | 5,844 | 6.1% | MTM | Small Dog Electronics | 3,700 | 3.9% |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | PureSleep | 3,116 | 37.9% | 11/30/2027 | AT&T | 1,600 | 19.5% | 11/30/2027 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | Starbucks | 1,900 | 22.6% | 5/31/2026 | AT&T | 1,500 | 17.9% | 3/31/2021 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | Chipotle | 2,300 | 31.5% | 9/30/2026 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | PetSmart | 18,241 | 14.3% | 9/30/2027 | Ross | 18,000 | 14.1% | 1/31/2028 | Five Below | 8,400 | 6.6% |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | American Mattress | 3,343 | 15.8% | 6/30/2027 | Potbelly Sandwich Works | 2,535 | 12.0% | 3/31/2027 | Noire Nail Bar | 2,525 | 11.9% |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | Marquee Dental | 4,550 | 13.8% | 9/30/2023 | Westhaven Realty | 3,866 | 11.7% | 6/15/2020 | Synergy Bank | 2,608 | 7.9% |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | Price Choice Food Market (LYHY Food Corp.) | 12,165 | 15.7% | 8/31/2023 | Citi Trends | 12,150 | 15.7% | 7/31/2024 | Family Dollar | 9,164 | 11.8% |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services | 21,036 | 24.6% | 10/11/2022 | Contempo Fashion Inc. | 3,047 | 3.6% | 6/30/2018 | Lee’s Beauty Supply | 2,870 | 3.4% |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | Rite Aid | 12,000 | 17.7% | 7/31/2019 | Wing Stop | 2,811 | 4.1% | 7/31/2022 | Sushi Village | 2,625 | 3.9% |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | Twisted X Boots | 11,002 | 17.6% | 11/30/2020 | Dollar Tree | 8,716 | 14.0% | 1/31/2020 | O’Reilly Auto Parts | 7,000 | 11.2% |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | Pet Things/Pet Stuff | 3,400 | 11.2% | 3/31/2022 | The Cigar Box | 3,050 | 10.1% | 2/1/2022 | First Doctors Weight Loss | 3,000 | 9.9% |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | PSF, PLLC d/b/a Family Allergy & Asthma | 2,600 | 13.0% | 6/30/2021 | Weight Watchers | 2,050 | 10.3% | 9/30/2018 | Juanita Marie Bays Salon | 1,550 | 7.8% |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
A-1-12
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Fourth Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Fifth Largest Tenant Name(7)(11) | Fifth Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Fifth Largest Tenant % of NRA | Fifth Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Engineering Report Date | Environmental Report Date (Phase I)(17)(18) | Environmental Report Date (Phase II)(17)(18) | Seismic Report Date | Seismic PML %(29) | Loan Purpose(22) | Engineering Reserve / Deferred Maintenance | Initial Tax Reserve |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | Various | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Recapitalization | 101,926 | 832,502 |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | 02/29/2020 | Ulta | 10,400 | 5.8% | 02/28/2026 | 11/02/2017 | 11/02/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | 03/31/2025 | SHOE CARNIVAL | 17,000 | 8.3% | 05/31/2025 | 10/31/2017 | 11/01/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | 01/31/2024 | WSS | 9,985 | 4.9% | 08/31/2020 | 11/04/2017 | 11/02/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | 01/31/2025 | DOLLAR TREE | 11,550 | 3.6% | 03/31/2020 | 11/02/2017 | 11/02/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | 01/31/2022 | Party City #294 | 12,096 | 5.0% | 03/31/2022 | 11/01/2017 | 11/03/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | 01/31/2021 | ULTA BEAUTY #219 | 10,000 | 4.4% | 07/31/2028 | 11/03/2017 | 11/03/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | 12/31/2019 | CAVENDER’S BOOT CITY | 13,548 | 6.5% | 06/30/2022 | 11/02/2017 | 11/02/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | 09/30/2022 | Catherine’s #5557, LLC | 3,600 | 2.5% | 06/30/2020 | 10/30/2017 | 11/01/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | 08/31/2024 | Kirkland’s | 7,623 | 5.4% | 01/31/2026 | 11/06/2017 | 11/03/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | 11/30/2020 | EYEMART EXPRESS | 5,400 | 2.3% | 01/31/2019 | 11/06/2017 | 11/06/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | 03/31/2021 | Five Below | 7,815 | 5.4% | 07/31/2025 | 11/03/2017 | 11/03/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | 06/30/2020 | The Teaching Store | 1,800 | 1.1% | 03/31/2020 | 11/01/2017 | 11/02/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 9/30/2019 | Eastman Kodak Company | 177,123 | 5.3% | 11/30/2018 | 10/11/2017 | 10/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 45,250 | 700,000 |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | 12/31/2021 | United States of America (GSA) - IRS | 36,752 | 2.8% | 8/14/2026 | 10/6/2017 | 11/10/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 240,000 | |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/23/2017 | 10/23/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Recapitalization | ||
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | 6/30/2020 | Cost Plus World Market | 19,673 | 5.2% | 17,340 sf in 1/31/2018; 2,333 sf in 1/31/2019 | 9/19/2017 | 9/19/2017 | 11/28/2017 | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 5,679 | 145,269 |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | Various | Various | Various | N/A | Various | Various | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 37,500 | 168,292 |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | 8/31/2021 | Viner Finance | 11,956 | 7.4% | 11/30/2028 | 12/11/2017 | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/11/2017 | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | 7/8/2022 | Normandy FundSub Mgmt Co., LLC | 6,290 | 9.2% | 5/11/2019 | 12/11/2017 | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | 1/31/2021 | Hyman Beck & Company, Inc. | 2,105 | 3.6% | 7/31/2018 | 12/8/2017 | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 12/31/2021 | Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. | 8,808 | 3.6% | 9/30/2021 | 1/8/2018 | 1/8/2018 | N/A | 1/8/2018 | 19.0% | Refinance | 12,500 | |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 7/27/2017 | 7/27/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 100,000 | 279,206 |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 33,402 | 113,903 |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/11/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/12/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8/22/2017 | 12/11/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/22/2017 | 11/27/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/14/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/8/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/18/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/11/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9/18/2017 | 9/18/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9/18/2017 | 9/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/14/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/14/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/8/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/14/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/13/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/13/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/07/2017 | 11/10/2017 | N/A | 11/10/2017 | 8.0% | Refinance | ||
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | ||
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9/22/2017 | 9/22/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/1/2017 | 11/30/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/15/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/12/2017 | 10/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/12/2017 | 10/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/2/2017 | 10/2/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/6/2017 | 11/6/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/12/2017 | 10/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | 1/9/2018 | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 6,875 | |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/29/2017 | 12/05/2017 | 1/9/2018 | N/A | N/A | |||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/29/2017 | 12/05/2017 | 1/9/2018 | N/A | N/A | |||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/29/2017 | 12/05/2017 | 1/9/2018 | N/A | N/A | |||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/05/2017 | 12/04/2017 | 1/9/2018 | N/A | N/A | |||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/4/2017 | 12/4/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | ||
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/17/2017 | 10/19/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 94,286 | |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/4/2017 | 12/4/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 44,791 | |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | 01/31/2021 | Albin Acquisition Corp | 11,797 | 5.4% | 12/31/2024 | 12/12/2017 | 12/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 191,442 | |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | 11/30/2020 | Samir Masri, an individual AND Fabric Avenue, Inc. | 16,000 | 6.3% | 4/30/2020 | 9/1/2017 | 9/6/2017 | N/A | 9/1/2017 | 17.0% | Refinance | 150,000 | 24,167 |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/3/2017 | 10/3/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 473,438 | |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/22/2017 | 11/22/2017 | N/A | 11/22/2017 | 9.0% | Refinance | 51,740 | |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | 6/30/2027 | Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins | 2,600 | 4.4% | 9/30/2027 | 8/1/2017 | 8/7/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 22,122 | |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/1/2017 | 11/1/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 6,563 | |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/1/2017 | 11/1/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/1/2017 | 11/1/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8/21/2017 | 8/21/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 2,724,408 | |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8/21/2017 | 8/21/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8/21/2017 | 8/21/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 01/03/2018 | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 317,550 | |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | 12/31/2023 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 01/03/2018 | 11/30/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 01/03/2018 | 12/01/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 01/03/2018 | 11/30/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | 4/30/2028 | Ball, Santin & McLeran, PLC | 4,862 | 3.6% | 10/31/2022 | 12/12/2017 | 12/13/2017 | N/A | N/A | 11.0% | Refinance | 53,284 | 105,879 |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | 9/30/2028 | Virginia ABC Store | 2,880 | 2.8% | 9/30/2020 | 1/16/2018 | 1/17/2018 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 92,411 | |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/9/2017 | 11/9/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 66,731 | 100,393 |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/24/2017 | 10/24/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 178,102 | |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/24/2017 | 10/24/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/24/2017 | 10/24/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/24/2017 | 10/24/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
A-1-13
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Fourth Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Fifth Largest Tenant Name(7)(11) | Fifth Largest Tenant Sq. Ft. | Fifth Largest Tenant % of NRA | Fifth Largest Tenant Exp. Date(2) | Engineering Report Date | Environmental Report Date (Phase I)(17)(18) | Environmental Report Date (Phase II)(17)(18) | Seismic Report Date | Seismic PML %(29) | Loan Purpose(22) | Engineering Reserve / Deferred Maintenance | Initial Tax Reserve |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/24/2017 | 10/24/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/24/2017 | 10/24/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | 10/1/2022 | Sensational Subs | 2,010 | 1.5% | 7/31/2020 | 11/20/2017 | 11/22/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 16,000 | 43,331 |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/10/2017 | 11/10/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | ||
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | 5/31/2019 | Penn Community Bank (Ground Lease) | N/A | N/A | 4/30/2024 | 11/20/2017 | 11/27/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 6,844 | |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/6/2017 | 11/16/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | ||
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | 1/31/2022 | Aspen Holdings Inc | 4,000 | 8.3% | 07/31/2022 | 10/31/2017 | 10/31/2017 | N/A | 10/31/2017 | 17.0% | Refinance | ||
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | 8/31/2022 | PC Specialists, Inc/Tech Intel | 5,969 | 5.3% | 5/31/2020 | 11/27/2017 | 11/27/2017 | N/A | 11/27/2017 | 12.0% | Acquisition | 8,800 | 56,517 |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | 9/30/2019 | Pulcinella’s | 3,285 | 3.5% | 4/30/2020 | 12/4/2017 | 12/5/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 125,503 | 59,818 |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 8,801 | |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/27/2017 | 10/27/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/28/2017 | 11/28/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/2/2017 | 11/2/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/12/2017 | 12/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 29,619 | |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | 1/31/2028 | Dollar Tree | 8,000 | 6.3% | 8/25/2027 | 11/20/2017 | 11/20/2017 | N/A | 12/1/2017 | 6.0% | Refinance | ||
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/10/2017 | 10/9/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 20,172 | |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/1/2017 | 11/1/2017 | N/A | 11/1/2017 | 7.0% | Refinance | 31,084 | |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/8/2017 | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 11,763 | |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/10/2017 | 11/08/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 31,937 | |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 28,352 | |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/12/2017 | 12/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/11/2017 | 12/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/6/2017 | 10/6/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 40,238 | |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/5/2018 | 1/5/2018 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 34,400 | |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/5/2018 | 1/5/2018 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/5/2018 | 1/5/2018 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 5/31/2027 | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 2,203 | 10.4% | 5/31/2027 | 11/13/2017 | 11/14/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 48,500 | |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/7/2017 | 12/6/2017 | N/A | 12/7/2017 | 6.0% | Acquisition | 38,125 | 24,217 |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8/3/2017 | 8/3/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 242,500 | |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/11/2017 | Various | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 116,056 | 7,029 |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/11/2017 | 11/16/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/11/2017 | 11/21/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/11/2017 | 11/21/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | 6/30/2024 | Nestor CPA Services, Inc. | 2,097 | 6.3% | 10/31/2019 | 12/8/2017 | 12/19/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | ||
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/9/2017 | 11/8/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 1,138,813 | 25,401 |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/4/2017 | 12/4/2017 | N/A | 12/6/2017 | 8.0% | Acquisition | 6,250 | 19,240 |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/18/2018 | 11/30/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | ||
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | 6/30/2021 | Powerline Discount Furniture | 3,850 | 5.0% | 4/1/2019 | 10/11/2017 | 10/11/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 71,493 | |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/14/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 3,480 | 27,337 |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/25/2017 | 10/26/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 21,800 | |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | 3/31/2019 | Funchal Café Americana | 2,761 | 3.2% | 12/31/2022 | 12/15/2017 | 12/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | ||
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | 2/28/2024 | Village Beads | 2,300 | 3.4% | 4/30/2021 | 10/16/2017 | 10/16/2017 | 12/18/2017 | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 16,342 | |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12/20/2017 | 12/7/2017 | N/A | 12/20/2017 | 17.0% | Refinance | ||
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | 5/31/2021 | CiCi’s Pizza | 4,000 | 6.4% | 5/31/2029 | 1/12/2017 | 1/12/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | 67,618 | |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 8/31/2020 | Get Well Urgent Care | 3,000 | 9.9% | 12/15/2022 | 11/9/2017 | 11/9/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 2,904 | 19,800 |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/18/2018 | 12/22/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | ||
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | 11/30/2022 | Indiana National Guard | 1,500 | 7.5% | 7/31/2018 | 11/14/2017 | 11/27/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 26,132 | |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/18/2018 | 12/5/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | ||
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/18/2018 | 12/4/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Refinance | ||
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10/5/2017 | 10/11/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 4,000 | |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8/15/2017 | 8/15/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 4,000 | |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11/1/2017 | 11/13/2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Acquisition | 4,000 |
A-1-14
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Monthly Tax Reserve(16)(30) | Initial Insurance Reserve | Monthly Insurance Reserve(30) | Initial Replacement Reserve | Monthly Replacement Reserve(16)(30) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | 355,956 | 203,509 | 43,761 | ||
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | |||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | |||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | |||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | |||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | |||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | |||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | |||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | |||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | |||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | |||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | |||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | |||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 100,000 | 144,000 | 24,000 | 51,576 | |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | 240,000 | 18,703 | |||
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | 31,262 | ||||
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | 69,176 | 14,780 | 14,076 | 5,659 | |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | 64,728 | 29,273 | 4,435 | 5,906 | |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | |||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | |||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | |||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | |||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 83,662 | 54,080 | 9,013 | 7,512 | |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 55,841 | 102,545 | 15,070 | 500,000 | |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | |||||
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | |||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | |||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | |||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | |||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | |||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | |||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | |||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | |||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | |||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | |||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | |||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | |||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | |||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | |||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | |||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | |||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | |||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | |||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | |||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | |||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | |||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | |||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | |||||
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | |||||
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | |||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | |||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | |||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | |||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | |||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | |||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | |||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | |||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | |||||
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | |||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | |||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | |||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | |||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | 7,528 | 2,509 | |||
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | 13,469 | 2,008 | |||
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | 44,791 | 29,826 | 2,983 | 1,808 | |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | 63,814 | 3,615 | |||
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | 24,167 | 84,013 | 6,463 | 4,267 | |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | 20,792 | 6,931 | 2,394 | ||
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | 12,935 | 6,063 | 1,213 | 741 | |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | 7,374 | 3,793 | 1,264 | 740 | |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | 400,000 | 1,290 | |||
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | |||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | |||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 681,102 | 89,787 | 29,929 | 11,369 | |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | |||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | |||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | |||||
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | |||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | |||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | |||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | 21,176 | 17,779 | 2,509 | 2,241 | |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | 30,804 | 9,173 | 834 | 50,000 | |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | 14,342 | 11,538 | 1,442 | 1,893 | |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | 29,684 | 19,929 | 6,643 | 886,000 | 6,542 |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | |||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | |||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-15
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Monthly Tax Reserve(16)(30) | Initial Insurance Reserve | Monthly Insurance Reserve(30) | Initial Replacement Reserve | Monthly Replacement Reserve(16)(30) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | |||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | |||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | 14,444 | 22,860 | 2,858 | 2,300 | |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | 1/12 of the Real Estate Taxes that Lender estimates will be payable during the next 12 months (initially $0.00 per month) | 28,663 | 5,136 | Borrower shall deposit to Lender on each Payment Date an amount equal to the greater of (i) (A) through and including the twelfth (12th) Payment Date, $0.00, (B) from and including the thirteenth (13th) Payment Date until and including the twenty-fourth (24th) Payment Date, one-twelfth of two percent (2%) of the annual Gross Revenues of the Property for the previous twelve (12) month period as determined on the anniversary of the Closing Date, and (C) from and including the twenty-fifth (25th) Payment Date for the remainder of the term of the Loan, one-twelfth (1/12) of four percent (4%) of the annual Gross Revenues of the Property for the previous twelve (12) month period as determined on the anniversary of the Closing Date, or (ii) the monthly amount required to be reserved pursuant to the Franchise Agreement for the replacement of FF&E but excluding any amounts attributable to a PIP | |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | 25,000 | 800 | |||
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | 1,113 | ||||
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | 13,803 | ||||
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | 21,737 | 6,796 | 2,614 | 2,338 | |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | 9,611 | 9,919 | 3,815 | 1,585 | |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | 5,501 | 5,426 | 565 | 299 | |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | |||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | |||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | |||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | 18,512 | ||||
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | |||||
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | 10,086 | 2,832 | 2,832 | 400 | |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | 7,401 | 3,329 | 634 | 722 | |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | 4,524 | 8,546 | |||
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | 7,984 | 58,188 | 5,819 | 9,460 | |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | 10,905 | 27,787 | 9,104 | 10,650 | |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | |||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | |||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | 10,061 | 10,882 | 2,720 | 1,017 | |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | 11,467 | 37,235 | 3,724 | 600,000 | 9,327 |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | |||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | |||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 16,167 | 9,734 | 749 | 264 | |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | 12,109 | 7,909 | 2,636 | 2,796 | |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | 1,667 | 833 | 1,082 | ||
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | 3,515 | 5,109 | 1,227 | 250 | |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | |||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | |||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | |||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | 5,291 | 3,779 | 1,260 | 551 | |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | 12,096 | 72,104 | 11,445 | 5,229 | |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | 9,620 | 4,533 | 567 | 682 | |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | |||||
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | 12,586 | 13,368 | 4,456 | 113,008 | 970 |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | 5,467 | 2,008 | 2,008 | 3,905 | |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | 5,450 | 350,000 | 764 | ||
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | 1,428 | ||||
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | 6,285 | 5,988 | 1,663 | 1,073 | |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | |||||
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | 11,270 | 13,063 | 2,613 | 781 | |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 4,950 | 3,450 | 1,150 | 380 | |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | |||||
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | 6,222 | 1,331 | 634 | 250 | |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | |||||
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | |||||
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | 333 | ||||
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | 333 | ||||
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | 333 |
A-1-16
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Replacement Reserve Cap | Initial TI/LC Reserve | Monthly TI/LC Reserve(30) | TI/LC Reserve Cap(21) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | N/A | 798,196 | N/A | |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | ||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | ||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | ||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | ||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | ||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | ||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | ||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | ||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | ||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | ||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | ||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | ||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | ||
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | N/A | 110,021 | 3,960,762 | |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | N/A | 50,020 | N/A | |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | N/A | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 | |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | N/A | 44,298 | 2,000,000 | |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | ||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | ||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | ||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | ||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 450,868 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 500,000 | N/A | ||
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A | N/A | ||
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | ||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | ||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | ||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | ||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | ||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | ||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | ||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | ||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | ||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | ||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | ||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | ||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | ||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | ||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | ||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | ||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | ||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | ||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | ||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | ||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | ||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | ||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | N/A | N/A | ||
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A | N/A | ||
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | ||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | ||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | ||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | ||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | ||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | ||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | ||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | ||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | N/A | N/A | ||
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | ||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | ||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | ||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | ||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | 9,143,376 | N/A | ||
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | 96,400 | N/A | ||
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | N/A | 6,781 | 135,000 | |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | N/A | 600,000 | 600,000 | |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | N/A | 250,000 | 3,413 | 255,993 |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | N/A | 375,000 | N/A | |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | 26,692 | 444,940 | 1,854 | 66,731 |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | N/A | 225,000 | 2,713 | 257,553 |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | 6,449 | 300,000 | ||
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | ||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | ||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | Residential: An amount, reasonably calculated by Lender in good faith on a quarterly basis, equal to the product of (x) $750 and (y) the number of free market residential apartment units located at the Properties at the time of calculation | 12,640 | N/A | |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | ||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | ||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | N/A | 85,000 | N/A | |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | ||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | ||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | ||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | N/A | 11,203 | N/A | |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | 50,000 | 6,543 | From loan origination through 12/1/2020: $235,561; from 1/1/2021 through loan maturity: $157,041 | |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | N/A | N/A | ||
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | 314,000 | N/A | ||
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | ||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | ||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-17
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Replacement Reserve Cap | Initial TI/LC Reserve | Monthly TI/LC Reserve(30) | TI/LC Reserve Cap(21) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | ||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | ||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | N/A | 55,500 | 5,751 | 200,000 |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | N/A | N/A | ||
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | 75,000 | 2,576 | 309,195 | |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | N/A | N/A | ||
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | N/A | 98,412 | N/A | |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | N/A | 18,703 | N/A | |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | N/A | 250,000 | 7,924 | 475,455 |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | 17,937 | 150,000 | 737 | N/A |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | ||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | ||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | ||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | 32,841 | N/A | ||
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | N/A | 319,460 | ||
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | N/A | N/A | ||
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | 26,001 | N/A | ||
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | N/A | N/A | ||
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | N/A | N/A | ||
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | N/A | N/A | ||
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | ||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | ||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A | N/A | ||
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | N/A | N/A | ||
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | ||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | ||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 1,322 | 120,000 | ||
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | N/A | N/A | ||
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A | N/A | ||
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | 416 | N/A | |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | ||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | ||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | ||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | N/A | 3,168 | 114,043 | |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | N/A | N/A | ||
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | N/A | N/A | ||
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | N/A | N/A | ||
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | N/A | 4,852 | 200,000 | |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | N/A | N/A | ||
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | N/A | N/A | ||
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | 90,000 | 8,924 | N/A | |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | N/A | 2,823 | 135,000 | |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | N/A | N/A | ||
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | N/A | 2,603 | N/A | |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | N/A | 12,500 | 152,000 | |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | N/A | N/A | ||
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | N/A | 1,591 | 100,000 | |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | N/A | N/A | ||
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | N/A | N/A | ||
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | N/A | N/A | ||
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | N/A | N/A | ||
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | N/A | N/A |
A-1-18
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Other Reserve Reserve Description(14)(15) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | Free Rent/Advance Rent Reserve ($154,430); Environmental Reserve ($9,827) |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | |
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | |
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | |
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | |
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | |
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | |
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | |
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | |
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | |
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | |
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | |
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | |
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | TI/LC Reserve ($9,203,324); Free Rent Holdback ($1,917,974) |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | Free Rent Reserve |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | N/A |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | Environmental Remediation Funds |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | Tenant Obligation Funds |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | |
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | |
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | |
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | |
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | Free Rent Reserve ($812,214); Outstanding Earmarked Rollover Deposit ($1,452,227); Litigation Funds ($300,000) |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | Radon Systems Reserve |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | |
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | |
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | |
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | |
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | |
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | |
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | |
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | |
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | |
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | |
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | |
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | |
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | |
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | |
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | |
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | |
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | |
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | |
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | |
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | |
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | |
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | |
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | N/A |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | |
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | |
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | |
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | |
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | |
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | |
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | |
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | |
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | Environmental Reserve |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | |
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | |
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | |
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | |
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | HVAC Holdback Reserve |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | Utility Submeter Reserve ($185,570); Environmental Reserve ($58,764) |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | TMK IPSCO Rent Reserve: $82,088 to be disbursed to borrower upon TMK IPSCO being in occupancy and paying full, unabated rent; TMK IPSCO TI Reserve: $473,076 to be disbursed to borrower for TMK IPSCO TI costs; Caterpiller Rent Reserve: $143,665 upon Caterpiller being in occupancy and paying full, unabated rent; Caterpiller TI Reserve: $2,907,270 to be disbursed to borrower for Caterpiller TI costs. |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | Outstanding TI/LC Reserve ($480,581.87); Free Rent Reserve ($76,553.41) |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | Violation Reserve |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | GE Leasing Funds |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | Existing PACE Assessment Funds |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | Dunkin Donuts TI Reserve ($46,800); Tenant Earnout Reserve ($622,968.33) |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | N/A |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | |
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | |
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | Renovation/Tenant Buyout Reserve ($3,500,000); Debt Service Shortfall Reserve ($2,000,000); Holdback Reserve ($4,102,064) |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | |
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | |
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | N/A |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | |
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | |
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | |
24 | Loan | Concord Place | Rent Abatement Reserve |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | N/A |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | Code Violations Reserve ($30,000) |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | Radon Reserve Funds ($32,010); Additional Collateral Funds ($15,000) |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | |
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | |
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-19
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Other Reserve Reserve Description(14)(15) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | |
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | |
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | Retail Gap Rent Reserve ($23,361); Grady Rent Reduction Reserve ($171,039) |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | Ground Lease Reserve ($14,056); PIP Reserve (Springing) |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | N/A |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | N/A |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | N/A |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | Rent Concession Funds |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | N/A |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | Rent Concession Fund ($125,537.40); Tenant Allowance Fund ($31,160.00) |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | |
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | |
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | |
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | N/A |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | N/A |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | N/A |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | N/A |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | PIP Reserve |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | Initial PIP Reserve Funds |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | |
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | |
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | N/A |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | |
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | |
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | Starbucks TI Reserve |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | Litigation Reserve |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | |
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | |
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | |
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | Assessment Reserve |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | Earn-out Funds |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | N/A |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | N/A |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | N/A |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | N/A |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | N/A |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | N/A |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | N/A |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | N/A |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | N/A |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | Rent Concession Reserve |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | N/A |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | Sweet Frog Frozen Yogurt Rollover Reserve Funds |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | N/A |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | N/A |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford |
A-1-20
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Initial Other Reserve(14) | Monthly Other Reserve(15) | Other Reserve Cap | Ownership Interest(7)(9) | Ground Lease Initial Expiration Date(7)(9) | Ground Lease Extension Options(7)(9) | Lockbox | Cash Management | Cut-off Date Pari Passu Mortgage Debt Balance | Cut-off Date Subord. Mortgage Debt Balance | Total Mortgage Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | Total Mortgage Debt UW NCF DSCR | Total Mortgage Debt UW NOI Debt Yield | Cut-off Date Mezzanine Debt Balance(19) | Total Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | Total Debt UW NCF DSCR |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | 164,257 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | 150,000,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 11,121,298 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | In Place | 53,942,899 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 19,500,000 | 61.8% | 1.09 | |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | 6,500,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | 100,000,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | 35,000,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | 3,000 | $3,000 each January | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | 5,044,401 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | 17,500,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12,500,000 | 78.1% | 1.18 | |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | 2,564,441 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | In Place | 45,000,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 451,250 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Soft | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 5,000,000 | 67.3% | 1.43 | |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | N/A | Leasehold | 12/31/2029 | 4 30-year options | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A | Various | Various | Various | Hard | In Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | Leasehold | 12/21/2113 | No extension options | |||||||||||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | Leasehold | 10/1/2116 | No extension options | |||||||||||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | 206,875 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | 42,900,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | 146,005 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | 244,334 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | 3,606,099 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | 557,135 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | 100,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | 2,872,500 | N/A | Leasehold | 4/30/2057 | 1, 5-year option | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | 76,863 | 19,216 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | 669,768 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 9,602,064 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Soft | Springing | 185,000,000 | 200,000,000 | 44.9% | 1.68 | 6.0% | 150,000,000 | 61.8% | 1.04 | |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | 123,697 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Soft | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | 30,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | 47,010 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A |
A-1-21
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Initial Other Reserve(14) | Monthly Other Reserve(15) | Other Reserve Cap | Ownership Interest(7)(9) | Ground Lease Initial Expiration Date(7)(9) | Ground Lease Extension Options(7)(9) | Lockbox | Cash Management | Cut-off Date Pari Passu Mortgage Debt Balance | Cut-off Date Subord. Mortgage Debt Balance | Total Mortgage Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | Total Mortgage Debt UW NCF DSCR | Total Mortgage Debt UW NOI Debt Yield | Cut-off Date Mezzanine Debt Balance(19) | Total Debt Cut-off Date LTV Ratio | Total Debt UW NCF DSCR |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | 194,400 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | 14,056 | N/A | Leasehold | 6/30/2044 | 2 10-year options | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | 43,296 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | 156,697 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | 395,500 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Soft | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | 121,500 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | In Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | 150,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | 12,000 | 1,278 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | 400,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | 3,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | 370,500 | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | 37,000 | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | 370,500 | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | 262,500 | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Springing | Springing | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | In Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | In Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | N/A | Fee Simple | N/A | N/A | Hard | In Place | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
A-1-22
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Total Debt UW NOI Debt Yield | Future Subordinate Debt Permitted(19) | Future Subordinate Debt Type(19) | Future Subordinate Debt Amount Permitted(19) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | ||||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | ||||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | ||||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | ||||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | ||||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | ||||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | ||||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | ||||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | ||||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | ||||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | ||||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | ||||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | 8.9% | No | N/A | N/A |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | 8.8% | No | N/A | N/A |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | ||||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | ||||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | ||||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | ||||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | 8.3% | No | N/A | N/A |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | ||||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | ||||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | ||||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | ||||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | ||||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | ||||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | ||||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | ||||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | ||||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | ||||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | ||||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | ||||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | ||||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | ||||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | ||||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | ||||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | ||||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | ||||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | ||||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | ||||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | ||||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | ||||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | ||||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | ||||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | ||||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | ||||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | ||||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | ||||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | ||||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | ||||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | ||||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | ||||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | ||||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | ||||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | (i) DSCR >= 1.25X or DSCR at Closing or (ii) LTV <= 75% or LTV at Closing |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | The Combined Loan-to-Value Ratio will not be greater than 73.2%, the Combined Debt Service Coverage Ratio will not be less than 1.65x, and the Combined Debt Yield will not be less than 9.89%. |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | ||||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | ||||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | 4.4% | No | N/A | N/A |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | ||||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | ||||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | ||||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | ||||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | ||||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | Combined LTV <= 75%, Combined DSCR >= 1.30x, Combined DY >= 9.0% |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | ||||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | ||||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-23
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Total Debt UW NOI Debt Yield | Future Subordinate Debt Permitted(19) | Future Subordinate Debt Type(19) | Future Subordinate Debt Amount Permitted(19) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | ||||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | ||||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine/Unsecured Subordinate Debt | The Combined Loan-to-Value Ratio will not be greater than 53.9% and the Combined Debt Yield will greater than 8.65%. |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | ||||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | ||||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | ||||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | The aggregate LTV (based on the Loan Amount and the Mezzanine Financing) cannot exceed 65%, (ii) the actual combined DSCR (calculated using the actual amortizing debt service payments due under the Loan and the Mezzanine Financing) must not be less than 1.40x, and (iii) the actual combined debt yield (calculated based on the Loan Amount and the Mezzanine Financing) cannot be less than 10.50% based on the trailing 12 net operating income (after deducting a 4% FF&E Reserve) |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | ||||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | ||||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | ||||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | ||||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | LTV <= 62.5%, DSCR >= 1.35x |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | ||||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | ||||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | ||||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | N/A | No | N/A | N/A |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | (i) Combined DSCR >= 1.20x, (ii) LTV <= 85% |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | (i) Combined DSCR >= 1.20x, (ii) LTV <= 85% |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | N/A | Yes | Mezzanine | (i) Combined DSCR >= 1.20x, (ii) LTV <= 85% |
A-1-24
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Sponsor(8)(23) |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | |
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | |
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | |
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | |
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | |
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | |
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | |
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | |
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | |
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | |
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | |
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | |
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | Leslie Westreich; Morty Yashar |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | Samuel T. Byrne; William H. Kremer |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | Spirit Realty, L.P. |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | J. Kenneth Dunn |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | Normandy Real Estate Fund, L.P.; Normandy Real Estate Management, LLC |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | |
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | |
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | |
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | |
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | John Ziegler |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | Thomas C. Guthrie; Kimberly D. Hendren |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | American Finance Trust, Inc. |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | |
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | |
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | |
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | |
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | |
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | |
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | |
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | |
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | |
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | |
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | |
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | |
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | |
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | |
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | |
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | |
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | |
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | |
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | |
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | |
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | |
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | |
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | Robert D. Olson; Robert D. Olson, Trustee of the Robert D. Olson Separate Property Trust, Established July 1, 2003 |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | Global Net Lease Operating Partnership, L.P. |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | |
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | |
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | |
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | |
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | |
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | |
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | |
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | |
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | Michael W. Brennan; Scott D. McKibben; Samuel A. Mandarino; Robert G. Vanecko; Eduardo E. Paneque; Allen Crosswell; Greenwood Holding Company, LLC; William T. MacMane; Brad O’Halloran |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | |
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | |
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | |
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | |
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | Mazher Papar |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | Ross H. Partrich |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | Chris P. D’Agostino |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | Felton Properties, Inc. |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | Tal Hassid |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | Greg W. Seitz; Brant P. Landry; Clint Riley |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | Thomas G. Lebeau; Robert E. Romney |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | Philip L. Lindborg; Jude L. Baca; William E. Schmidt |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | Ryan C. Rans |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | |
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | |
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | The Chetrit Group LLC; Stellar Management LLC |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | |
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | |
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Benjamin B. Rubin; Samuel I. Kirschenbaum |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | |
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | |
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | |
24 | Loan | Concord Place | R. Craig Hannay Trust; R. Craig Hannay |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | Isaac Pretter; Eron Sodie |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | Matthew N. Follett; Randall C. Naess, Deette Richmond Sipos and Robert E. Richmond as Co-trustees of the Testamentary Trust Created Under the Will of Edmund N. Richmond Dated February 1962; Kerry J. Murphy, Gary L. Barton, Linda J. Wilson |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | Ziv Sarig; Jonathan Polster |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | |
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | |
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-25
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Sponsor(8)(23) |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | |
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | |
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | Dion Meltzer; Alan Joe |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | Chandra Sekhar Tokala; Minhas Ladiwalla |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | Leo S. Ullman |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | Robert Ridino |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | Steve K. Wasserman; Linda S. Wasserman; Leonard J. Comden; Susan E. Comden |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | Rajiv Kumar; Gurbax Bhasin |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | Samuel T. Judge |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | Jose Chacalo Hilu; Veraz Fondo Dos, LLC |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | |
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | |
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | |
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | Darryl B. Flaming |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | E. Stanley Kroenke |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | Donald Shepherd |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | Daniel J. Elefante; The Elefante Revocable Living Trust Dated October 9,1996; The Elefante Children’s Trust No. 1 Established December 31, 2012; The Elefante Children’s Trust No. 2 Established December 31, 2012; The Elefante Children’s Trust No. 3 Established December 31, 2012 |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | M. Kevin Dzurik; Kevin C. Gamble; Keith E. Gamble; Denny Gamble, Jr. |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | The Plaza Hospitality, LLC; Mansoor Ebrahim Nabina |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | Dana Foster; W. Edward Trehern; Dana Blake Foster |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | |
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | |
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | Margaret Van Epps |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | P. Carter Rise |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | |
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | |
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | R.L. Arnos; Lawrence Moon |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | William A. Butler; Daniel W. Anderson; Sr., Stephen L. Butler; Phyllis Kelsey-Greene; Thomas Michael Johnson; Robert E. Nesbitt; Michael Spiker; William Matthew Butler |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | Zalman Skoblo |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | Donald Matheson; Uche Alozie |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | |
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | |
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | |
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | Michael S. Outlaw; Jacob Kobi Avrahami |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | Joel Davidovici; Maurice Dopplet |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | Matthew N. Follett; Robert L. Beyer, JR.; Keri L. Beyer |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | T.I.P. Properties |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | Leon Ojalvo; Steven Hurowitz |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | Justin Schneck; Samantha Schneck |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | James B. O’Malley |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | Brandon Hall; Brett Wilderman |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | Carnegie Properties, Inc. |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | Richard A. Bocci |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | Roger M. Crouch, Neill H. Taylor, Peter C. Sisson |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | Michael Basinet; Sheri Basinet |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | Michael B. McDonald |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | Frank P. Farinella; Phillip John Farinella Jr. |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | Michael B. McDonald |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | Michael B. McDonald |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | Ladder Capital CRE Equity LLC |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | Ladder Capital CRE Equity LLC |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | Ladder Capital CRE Equity LLC |
A-1-26
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Guarantor(23)(32) | Affiliated Sponsors |
1 | Loan | AFIN Portfolio | American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. | Group 1 |
1.01 | Property | Montecito Crossing | ||
1.02 | Property | Jefferson Commons | ||
1.03 | Property | Best on the Boulevard | ||
1.04 | Property | Northpark Center | ||
1.05 | Property | Anderson Station | ||
1.06 | Property | Cross Pointe Center | ||
1.07 | Property | San Pedro Crossing | ||
1.08 | Property | Riverbend Marketplace | ||
1.09 | Property | Shops at RiverGate South | ||
1.1 | Property | Centennial Plaza | ||
1.11 | Property | Shoppes of West Melbourne | ||
1.12 | Property | North Lakeland Plaza | ||
2 | Loan | Tryad Industrial & Business Center | Leslie Westreich; Morty Yashar | No |
3 | Loan | CrossPoint | Brian Chaisson; Samuel T. Byrne | No |
4 | Loan | Houston Distribution Center | Spirit Realty, L.P. | No |
5 | Loan | Moore Plaza | J. Kenneth Dunn | No |
6 | Loan | Park Place at Florham Park | Normandy Real Estate Fund, L.P.; Normandy Real Estate Management, LLC | No |
6.01 | Property | 200 Park Place | ||
6.02 | Property | 230 Park Place | ||
6.03 | Property | 220 Park Place | ||
6.04 | Property | 210 Park Place | ||
7 | Loan | City Square and Clay Street | John Ziegler | No |
8 | Loan | University Properties Portfolio | Thomas C. Guthrie; Kimberly D. Hendren | No |
9 | Loan | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio | American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. | Group 1 |
9.01 | Property | FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | ||
9.02 | Property | Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | ||
9.03 | Property | FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | ||
9.04 | Property | FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | ||
9.05 | Property | Chili’s - McHenry, IL | ||
9.06 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | ||
9.07 | Property | Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | ||
9.08 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | ||
9.09 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | ||
9.1 | Property | Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | ||
9.11 | Property | Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | ||
9.12 | Property | Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | ||
9.13 | Property | Dollar General - Kingston, NY | ||
9.14 | Property | Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | ||
9.15 | Property | Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | ||
9.16 | Property | Dollar General - Farmington, NY | ||
9.17 | Property | Dollar General - Otego, NY | ||
9.18 | Property | Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | ||
9.19 | Property | Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | ||
9.2 | Property | Dollar General - Utica, NY | ||
9.21 | Property | Dollar General - Parish, NY | ||
9.22 | Property | Dollar General - Geddes, NY | ||
10 | Loan | Residence Inn Irvine | Robert D. Olson; Robert D. Olson, Trustee of the Robert D. Olson Separate Property Trust, Established July 1, 2003 | No |
11 | Loan | GNL Industrial Portfolio | Global Net Lease Operating Partnership, L.P. | No |
11.01 | Property | 46643 Ryan Court | ||
11.02 | Property | 10088 South 136th Street | ||
11.03 | Property | 350 International Drive | ||
11.04 | Property | 210 Pierce Road | ||
11.05 | Property | 815 Industrial Parkway | ||
11.06 | Property | 11495 Deerfield Road | ||
11.07 | Property | 12 Mechanic Street | ||
11.08 | Property | 911 Industrial Parkway | ||
12 | Loan | BlueLinx Portfolio | Michael W. Brennan; Scott D. McKibben; Samuel A. Mandarino; Robert G. Vanecko; Eduardo E. Paneque; Allen Crosswell; Greenwood Holding Company, LLC; William T. MacMane; Brad O’Halloran | No |
12.01 | Property | BlueLinx Frederick | ||
12.02 | Property | BlueLinx Bellingham | ||
12.03 | Property | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | ||
12.04 | Property | BlueLinx Butner | ||
13 | Loan | El Dorado Tech Center | El Dorado Operating Company LLC | No |
14 | Loan | Harford Village MHC | Ross H. Partrich | No |
15 | Loan | The Offices at Sam Houston | Chris P. D’Agostino | No |
16 | Loan | Braemar Office Park | William D. Felton | No |
17 | Loan | 4851 South Alameda Street | Tal Hassid | No |
18 | Loan | 1990 NASA Boulevard | Greg W. Seitz; Brant P. Landry; Clint Riley | No |
19 | Loan | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion | Thomas G. Lebeau; Robert E. Romney | No |
20 | Loan | The Village at La Orilla | Philip L. Lindborg; Jude L. Baca; William E. Schmidt | No |
21 | Loan | South Bend Medical Office | Ryan C. Rans | No |
21.01 | Property | Allied Physicians Surgery Center | ||
21.02 | Property | South Bend Orthopedic Associates | ||
22 | Loan | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers | Jacob Chetrit; Laurence Gluck | No |
22.01 | Property | Yorkshire Towers | ||
22.02 | Property | Lexington Towers | ||
23 | Loan | Chicago Industrial Portfolio | Benjamin B. Rubin; Samuel I. Kirschenbaum | No |
23.01 | Property | 425-455 E. Algonquin Road | ||
23.02 | Property | 8811 S. 77th Avenue | ||
23.03 | Property | 7400 W. 100th Place | ||
24 | Loan | Concord Place | R. Craig Hannay Trust; R. Craig Hannay | No |
25 | Loan | Fortuna Center Plaza | Isaac Pretter; Eron Sodie | No |
26 | Loan | Firehouse Self Storage | Matthew N. Follett; Randall C. Naess, Deette Richmond Sipos and Robert E. Richmond as Co-trustees of the Testamentary Trust Created Under the Will of Edmund N. Richmond Dated February 1962; Kerry J. Murphy, Gary L. Barton, Linda J. Wilson | Group 2 |
27 | Loan | Seal Multifamily Portfolio | Ziv Sarig; Jonathan Polster | No |
27.01 | Property | Norton and Barberton | ||
27.02 | Property | Stow Apartments | ||
27.03 | Property | Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments |
A-1-27
UBS 2018-C8 Annex A-1
Mortgage Loan Number | Property Flag | Property Name | Guarantor(23)(32) | Affiliated Sponsors |
27.04 | Property | Firestone Park Apartments | ||
27.05 | Property | Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments | ||
28 | Loan | 10 Park Place South | Dion Meltzer; Alan Joe | No |
29 | Loan | Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport | Chandra Sekhar Tokala; Minhas Ladiwalla | No |
30 | Loan | Quakertown Shopping Center | Leo S. Ullman | No |
31 | Loan | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach | Robert Ridino | No |
32 | Loan | Tarzana Village | Steve K. Wasserman; Linda S. Wasserman; Leonard J. Comden; Susan E. Comden | No |
33 | Loan | 249 E Ocean Blvd | Rajiv Kumar; Gurbax Bhasin | No |
34 | Loan | Dorset & Market Street | Samuel T. Judge | No |
35 | Loan | National NNN Retail Portfolio | Jose Chacalo Hilu; Veraz Fondo Dos, LLC | No |
35.01 | Property | Joliet Retail | ||
35.02 | Property | Durham Retail | ||
35.03 | Property | Bradley Retail | ||
36 | Loan | A Storage Place - Evergreen | Darryl B. Flaming | No |
37 | Loan | Eight Points Shopping Center | E. Stanley Kroenke | No |
38 | Loan | Las Brisas MHC | Donald Shepherd | No |
39 | Loan | Storage Direct Roseville | Daniel J. Elefante; The Elefante Revocable Living Trust Dated October 9,1996; The Elefante Children’s Trust No. 1 Established December 31, 2012; The Elefante Children’s Trust No. 2 Established December 31, 2012; The Elefante Children’s Trust No. 3 Established December 31, 2012 | No |
40 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express - Ruston | M. Kevin Dzurik; Kevin C. Gamble; Keith E. Gamble; Denny Gamble, Jr. | No |
41 | Loan | Holiday Inn Express Trinity | The Plaza Hospitality, LLC; Mansoor Ebrahim Nabina | No |
42 | Loan | Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio | Dana Foster; W. Edward Trehern; Dana Blake Foster | No |
42.01 | Property | Hampton Inn | ||
42.02 | Property | Comfort Inn | ||
43 | Loan | Ivy Bridge Extension | Margaret Van Epps | No |
44 | Loan | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio | P. Carter Rise | No |
44.01 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge East | ||
44.02 | Property | Woodspring Suites Baton Rouge North | ||
45 | Loan | Shoppes Marketplace at Saxony | RD Investment Holdings LLC | No |
46 | Loan | Birches at Countryside | William A. Butler; Daniel W. Anderson; Sr., Stephen L. Butler; Phyllis Kelsey-Greene; Thomas Michael Johnson; Robert E. Nesbitt; Michael Spiker; William Matthew Butler | No |
47 | Loan | Kohl’s Neenah | Zalman Skoblo | No |
48 | Loan | Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio | Donald Matheson; Uche Alozie | No |
48.01 | Property | Myrtle | ||
48.02 | Property | Saint John’s | ||
48.03 | Property | Dekalb | ||
49 | Loan | Westhaven Town Center | Michael S. Outlaw; Jacob Kobi Avrahami | No |
50 | Loan | Bel Lindo Apartments | Joel Davidovici; Maurice Dopplet | No |
51 | Loan | East Sac Self Storage | Matthew N. Follett; Robert L. Beyer, JR.; Keri L. Beyer | Group 2 |
52 | Loan | Canyon Gate Self Storage | T.I.P. Properties | No |
53 | Loan | Lauderdale Manor | Leon Ojalvo; Steven Hurowitz | No |
54 | Loan | The Avery Georgetown | Justin Schneck; Samantha Schneck | No |
55 | Loan | Appleton Self Storage | James B. O’Malley | No |
56 | Loan | 100 Fairfield | Brandon Hall; Brett Wilderman | No |
57 | Loan | School Street Crossing | Carnegie Properties, Inc. | No |
58 | Loan | 645-679 Manor Drive | Richard A. Bocci | No |
59 | Loan | Plaza Point Shopping Center | Roger M. Crouch, Neill H. Taylor, Peter C. Sisson | No |
60 | Loan | Boulevard I & II | Michael Basinet; Sheri Basinet | No |
61 | Loan | Walgreens - Harlingen, TX | Michael B. McDonald | Group 3 |
62 | Loan | Clarksville Shops | Frank P. Farinella; Phillip John Farinella Jr. | No |
63 | Loan | Walgreens - Dallas, GA | Michael B. McDonald | Group 3 |
64 | Loan | Walgreens - Guthrie, OK | Michael B. McDonald | Group 3 |
65 | Loan | Dollar General Winterset | Ladder Capital CRE Equity LLC | Group 4 |
66 | Loan | Dollar General Bay City | Ladder Capital CRE Equity LLC | Group 4 |
67 | Loan | Dollar General Rockford | Ladder Capital CRE Equity LLC | Group 4 |
A-1-28
UBS 2018-C8
Footnotes to Annex A-1
(1) | UBS AG, by and through its branch office at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York (“UBS AG”), Ladder Capital Finance LLC (“LCF”), Société Générale (“SG”), Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC (“RMF”), Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (“CCRE”), CIBC Inc. (“CIBC”), and Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”). |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Lease Expirations and Terminations—Terminations” for information regarding certain lease termination options affecting the 5 largest tenants at Mortgaged Properties securing the 15 largest Mortgage Loans. |
(3) | The Original Balance and Cut-off Date Balance represent only the Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity. The Underwritten NOI DSCR, Underwritten NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD, Underwritten NOI Debt Yield, Underwritten NCF Debt Yield and Cut-off Date Balance Per Unit/SF are calculated based on the Mortgage Loan included in the issuing entity and the related pari passu companion loans in the aggregate. For more information regarding the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified under the column heading in this Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, Tryad Industrial & Business Center, CrossPoint, Houston Distribution Center, Park Place at Florham Park, City Square and Clay Street, BlueLinx Portfolio, and Yorkshire & Lexington Towers see the charts titled “Whole Loan Summary” and “Whole Loan Control Notes and Non-Control Notes” in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—The Whole Loans”. |
(4) | Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – The appraisal concluded an “As-Is” Appraised Value of $91,200,000. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD are calculated using the alternate market “As-Is” Appraised Value of the Mortgaged Properties of $96,000,000, as of December 4, 2017, which assumes that outstanding landlord obligations for free rent, tenant improvements, and leasing commissions are fully funded and escrowed by the lender through a title company. At origination, landlord obligations of $5,044,401 were escrowed. Based on the “As-Is” Appraised Value of $91,200,000 and the Whole Loan, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD are 68.5% and 68.5%, respectively. |
Loan No. 18 – 1990 NASA Boulevard – The As-Stabilized Appraised Value of $27,000,000 as of December 1, 2017 was used since the stabilization condition has been met.
Loan No. 20 – The Village at La Orilla – The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD, and Appraised Value with respect to the Mortgage Loan are based on the “As-Stabilized” Appraised Value of $22,050,000 as of January 1, 2018, which assumes certain tenants are in occupancy who have signed leases but have not yet taken their space. At origination, $622,968 was reserved with respect to these tenants. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and LTV Ratio at Maturity or ARD assuming the “As-Is” Appraised Value of $21,450,000 as of August 2, 2017 are 71.7% and 58.8%, respectively.
Loan No. 21 – South Bend Medical Office – The Appraised Value used in the calculation of the LTV ratio for each Mortgaged Property is reflected in the appraisal as the “As-Stabilized” Appraised Value of $21,800,000, which reflects the value of the Mortgaged Properties upon reaching 95.0% occupancy. Subsequent to the date of the appraisal, the sole tenant at each Mortgaged Property renewed its lease for a term extending beyond the maturity of the Mortgage Loan and the Mortgaged Properties are 100.0% occupied. As such, the $21,800,000 Appraised Value is reflected herein as the “As-Is” Appraised Value.
Loan No. 53 – Lauderdale Manor – The As-Stabilized Appraised Value of $8,100,000 as of November 3, 2017 was used since the stabilization condition has been met.
(5) | Loan No. 3 – CrossPoint – The Original Balance and Cut-off Date Balance of $50,000,000 represents the non-controlling Note A-2, Note A-3 and Note A-9 of a $150,000,000 Whole Loan evidenced by ten pari passu notes. Notes A-1, A-4, A-7, A-8 and A-10 are currently held by CCRE or an affiliate, and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time. Promissory Notes A-5 and A-6 are currently held by Starwood Mortgage Capital LLC or an affiliate, and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time. The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of March 4, 2018. Following the lockout period, the borrower has the right to defease the Whole Loan in whole, or in part with respect to a release parcel, on any date before September 6, 2027. The lockout period will expire on the earlier to occur of (i) two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized or (ii) March 4, 2021. For the purposes of this prospectus, the assumed lockout period of 24 months is based on the expected UBS 2018-C8 securitization closing date in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – The Whole Loan can be defeased at any time after two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized. The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of March 6, 2018. For the purposes of this prospectus, the assumed lockout period of 24 months is based on the expected UBS 2018-C8 securitization closing date in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer.
A-1-29
Loan No. 7 – City Square and Clay Street – The Whole Loan can be defeased at any time after the date that is the earlier of (i) two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized and (ii) the fourth anniversary of the first payment date. The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of March 6, 2018. For the purposes of this prospectus, the assumed lockout period of 24 months is based on the expected UBS 2018-C8 securitization closing date in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer.
Loan No. 22 – Yorkshire & Lexington Towers – The Whole Loan can be defeased at any time after the date that is two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized (the “Defeasance Lockout Expiration Date”), but prior to April 6, 2022. If as of November 6, 2021, the Defeasance Lockout Expiration Date has not occurred, the borrower may prepay with a yield maintenance premium. The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 28 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of November 6, 2017. For the purposes of this prospectus, the assumed lockout period of 28 months is based on the expected UBS 2018-C8 securitization closing date in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer.
(6) | Loan No. 1 – AFIN Portfolio – Any time after the expiration of the lockout period, the borrower may obtain the release of any Mortgaged Property, provided, among other things, (i) the sale of such Mortgaged Property is pursuant to an arm’s-length agreement to a third party not affiliated with any borrower or guarantor, (ii) the borrower prepays an amount of the Whole Loan equal to the release price together with any yield maintenance premium, (iii) no event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents has or will be continuing, (iv) the borrowers will remain special purpose bankruptcy remote entity, (v) the borrowers and the guarantor execute and deliver such documents as lender may reasonably request to confirm the continued validity of the Mortgage Loan documents and liens, (vi) the DSCR for all of the remaining Mortgaged Properties will not be less than the greater of (a) the DSCR immediately preceding such release and (b) 2.34x, and (vii) if the LTV (such value to be determined, in the lender’s sole discretion, by any commercially reasonable method permitted to a REMIC trust; and which will exclude the value of personal property or going concern value, if any) is greater than 125.0%, the borrower will also make payment of principal in an amount such that the LTV (such value to be determined, in the lender’s sole discretion, by any commercially reasonable method permitted to a REMIC trust; and which will exclude the value of personal property or going concern value, if any) is no more than 125.0%. |
Loan No. 3 – CrossPoint – At any time after the permitted release date, the borrower may obtain the release of a one acre parcel on the Mortgaged Property that includes a vacant one-story 13,700 SF (1% of NRA) building located on the northeast corner of the Mortgaged Property, upon, among other things, the delivery of defeasance collateral in an amount equal to $1,440,000.
Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – Any time after the expiration of the lockout period, the borrower may obtain the release of any Mortgaged Property, provided, among other things, per the Mortgage Loan documents, (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing beyond any applicable notice and cure periods; (ii) the borrower is required to defease an amount equal to the adjusted release amount which is the greater of (a) 100.0% of the net sales proceeds and (b) 120.0% of the allocated loan amount for such Mortgaged Property being released; (iii) after giving effect to the release of such Mortgaged Property, the DSCR and the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Properties may not be less than the greater of (a) the DSCR and the debt yield as of origination and (b) the DSCR and the debt yield immediately prior to the release of such Mortgaged Property; and (iv) after giving effect to the release of such Mortgaged Property, the LTV for the remaining Mortgaged Properties may not be greater than the lesser of (a) the LTV as of origination and (b) the LTV immediately prior to the release of such Mortgaged Property. In addition, after the expiration of the lockout period, the borrower may obtain the release of a certain non-income producing portion of the Mortgaged Properties subject to certain conditions pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents including (i) such release shall not have an adverse effect on the use, operation or value of the remaining Mortgaged Properties, (ii) after giving effect to such release, each of the release parcel and the remaining Mortgaged Properties constitute a separate tax lot and conform to and are in compliance in all material respects with applicable legal requirements, (iii) the satisfaction of the REMIC LTV test and (iv) the use of the released parcel is limited to retail, residential, for sale residential condominiums or hotel uses.
Loan No. 9 – AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – Provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing (unless such event of default related solely to the release Mortgaged Property and such release would cause such event of default to be cured in full), the borrowers may obtain the release of one or more individual Mortgaged Properties by electing either (i) partial defeasance (after the expiration of the lockout period and before October 6, 2027) in the amount equal to 120.0% of the allocated loan amount with respect to the applicable release Mortgaged Property (the “Release Amount”) or (ii) a partial prepayment of the loan (after the 12th monthly payment date and before October 6, 2027) in an amount equal to the Release Amount accompanied by a yield maintenance premium. The applicable release must satisfy each of the following conditions: (i) 30 days’ prior written notice of the proposed release, (ii) the DSCR for the remaining Mortgaged Properties following the release based on the trailing 12 months is no less than the greater of the DSCR immediately preceding such release and 2.81x, (iii) the LTV ratio for the remaining Mortgaged Properties following the release is no greater than the lesser of the LTV ratio immediately preceding such release and 53.4%, (iv) at least 15 days’ prior to any release, lender shall have received new appraisals for each individual Mortgaged Property that is not subject to the applicable release (and has not been previously released) (v) the borrowers and the guarantor execute and deliver such documents as lender may reasonably request to confirm the continued validity of the Mortgage Loan documents and liens, (vi) satisfaction of REMIC requirements and (vii) other conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents.
A-1-30
Loan No. 11 – GNL Industrial Portfolio – Any time after the expiration of the lockout period, the borrower may obtain the release of any Mortgaged Property in the portfolio, provided, among other things, (i) it does not release more than one of the 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property, the 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property or the 350 International Drive Mortgaged Property, (ii) it makes a payment of any required yield maintenance premium plus a release price equal to 125.0% of the allocated loan amount for such Mortgaged Properties mentioned in (i) or 115.0% for all other Mortgaged Properties, (iii) the DSCR is no less than the greater of (x) 2.79x or (y) the DSCR immediately prior to such release and (iv) the LTV is no more than the lesser of (x) 52.2% and (y) the LTV immediately prior to the release of the applicable Mortgaged Property.
Loan No. 12 – BlueLinx Portfolio – Any time after the release date and prior to the maturity date, the borrower may obtain the release of the BlueLinx Butner Mortgaged Property and the BlueLinx Lawrenceville Mortgaged Property from the lien of the loan subject to satisfaction of the applicable conditions set forth therein, including, without limitation, that (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, (ii) the borrower has delivered a REMIC opinion with respect to any applicable release in form and substance acceptable to the lender and the rating agencies and such release otherwise satisfies then applicable REMIC rules and regulations, (iii) prepayment or defeasance of the loan is then permitted and the borrower has either prepaid the loan (to the extent that a partial prepayment is then permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents) or partially defeased the loan (to the extent that a partial defeasance is then permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents), (i) with respect to the first release, an amount equal to the greater of (a) 115.0% of the allocated loan amount of such Mortgaged Property and (b) 90.0% of the net sales proceeds applicable to such Mortgaged Property and (ii) with respect to the second release, an amount equal to the greater of (a) 125.0% of the allocated loan amount of such Mortgaged Property and (b) the net sales proceeds applicable to such Mortgaged Property, and (iv) each of the DSCR and the debt yield after any such release is at least equal to the greater of the same as of loan closing and the same immediately prior to release (provided, that, for the purposes of the foregoing, DSCR and debt yield shall be calculated only with respect to the portion of the Whole Loan that has not been defeased as of the date of the applicable release).
Loan No. 22 – Yorkshire & Lexington Towers – On any payment date two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized but prior to April 6, 2022, the borrower may partially defease a portion of the Whole Loan in connection with the release of the Lexington Towers Mortgaged Property subject to certain conditions as defined in the loan agreement. If as of November 6, 2021, the Defeasance Lockout Expiration Date has not occurred, the borrower may prepay with a yield maintenance premium. The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 28 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of November 6, 2017. The release of the Lexington Towers Mortgaged Property is permitted on or after the date that is earlier to occur of (i) four years from the first monthly payment date of November 6, 2017 or (ii) two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized.
Loan No. 25 – Fortuna Center Plaza – The related borrower may obtain the release of the portion of the Mortgaged Property leased to the second largest tenant, Walgreens, representing approximately 13.9% of the NRA, by partial defeasance of a portion of the Mortgage Loan subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral equal to the greater of (a) 120.0% of the allocated loan amount for such parcel, (b) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the DSCR for the remaining Mortgaged Property not less than the DSCR at origination, (c) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not less than the debt yield at origination and (d) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the LTV for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not greater than the LTV at origination; (ii) delivery of a REMIC opinion and (iii) receipt of a rating agency confirmation.
Loan No. 42 – Hampton Inn and Comfort Inn Moss Point Portfolio – Any time after the expiration of the lockout period, the borrower may obtain the release of any Mortgaged Property, provided, among other things, per the Mortgage Loan documents, (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing beyond any applicable notice and cure periods; (ii) the borrower will be required to defease an amount equal to the adjusted release amount which is the greater of (a) 125.0% of the allocated loan amount for such Mortgaged Property and (b) the amount that, after giving effect to the release of such Mortgaged Property, (I) the DSCR and the debt yield for the remaining Mortgaged Property may not be less than the greater of (A) the DSCR and the debt yield as of origination for all Mortgaged Properties and (B) the DSCR and the debt yield, for all Mortgaged Properties, immediately prior to the release of such Mortgaged Property, (II) after giving effect to the release of such Mortgaged Property, the LTV for the remaining Mortgaged Property may not be greater than the lesser of (A) the LTV, all Mortgaged Properties, immediately prior to the release of such Mortgaged Property and (B) the LTV immediately prior to the release of such Mortgaged Property.
Loan No. 59 – Plaza Point Shopping Center – The related borrower may obtain the release of the Mortgaged Property leased to the fifth largest tenant, Cici’s Pizza, representing approximately 6.4% of the NRA, by partial defeasance of a portion of the Mortgage Loan subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among others: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral equal to the greater of (a) the greater of (1) 125.0% of the allocated loan amount for such parcel and (2) 100.0% of the net sales proceeds of such parcel, which in no event shall be less than 95.0% of the gross sales price of such parcel (without regard to customary adjustments and prorations), (b) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the DSCR for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not less than the greater of (1) the DSCR at origination and (2) the DSCR prior to release of such parcel, and (c) after giving effect to such partial defeasance, an amount such that the LTV for the remaining Mortgaged Property is not greater than the lesser of (1) the LTV at origination and (2) the LTV prior to release of such parcel; (ii) delivery of a REMIC opinion and (iii) receipt of a rating agency confirmation.
A-1-31
(7) | Loan No. 1 – AFIN Portfolio – The Whole Loan consists of both the fee and leasehold interests in the Cross Pointe Center Mortgaged Property. The Cross Pointe Center Mortgaged Property is subject to a ground lease with Developers Realty Corp., which is indirectly a wholly-owned subsidiary of DDR Corp., for a 25-year term, expiring on February 1, 2047. The ground lease has two, ten-year renewal options remaining, through February 1, 2067. The current annual ground rent is $377,617. |
Loan No. 2 – Tryad Industrial & Business Center – In connection with a 20-year PILOT agreement with the County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency (“IDA”), the borrower leased the Mortgaged Property to the IDA pursuant to a ground lease that requires rent of $1.00 per year and is coterminous with the PILOT agreement. The IDA subleased the Mortgaged Property back to the borrower to operate the related Mortgaged Property. The lender has the right to terminate the ground lease and the related sub-lease in connection with a foreclosure proceeding against the borrower.
Loan No. 20 – The Village at La Orilla – The borrower owns a leasehold interest in the Mortgaged Property in connection with an industrial revenue bond (“IRB”) structure, pursuant to which a bond was issued in the maximum principal amount of $4,000,000 (the “Bond”). In connection with the IRB structure, the borrower transferred its fee simple interest in the Mortgaged Property to Bernalillo County, New Mexico (the “County”) and the County leased the Mortgaged Property back to the borrower pursuant to a lease agreement (the “Bond Lease”). The Bond Lease expires on the earlier of the date of payment of the Bond, the termination of the Bond Lease pursuant to the terms of the Bond Lease or August 1, 2032, and provides for rental payments in an amount equal to the sum of (i) the principal and interest payments due on the Bond (which interest is calculated at 2.0% annually), and (ii) a $1,500 annual depositary fee. At the expiration (or earlier termination) of the Bond Lease, the County is required to re-convey its fee simple interest in the Mortgaged Property to the borrower for payment of $1.00 (plus any unpaid payment-in-lieu of taxes (“PILOT”) payments or other outstanding fees). The Bond Lease provides, among other things, for a PILOT under which the Mortgaged Property is assessed payments in an amount equal to a base PILOT amount of $17,032, plus 42.0% of any incremental increase over the base PILOT amount in the Mortgaged Property’s assessed real and personal property values, annualized over the stated maturity of the Bond. The Bond is owned by an affiliate of the borrower and pledged to the lender. The County executed a joinder to the leasehold mortgage subjecting its fee interest to the lender’s mortgage. Accordingly, both the fee and leasehold interests serve as collateral for the Mortgage Loan.
Loan No. 30 – Quakertown Shopping Center – The fifth largest tenant, Penn Community Bank, occupies its premises subject to a ground lease with the borrower that expires April 30, 2024. The borrower owns a fee simple interest in the entire Mortgaged Property.
(8) | Loan No. 8 – University Properties Portfolio – The University Properties Portfolio Mortgaged Property includes the Stadium Crossing mortgaged property which is comprised of 201 condominium units out of a total of 226 condominium units at the development. The Stadium Crossing mortgaged property is governed by the Varsity Villas Homeowners Association which is controlled and managed by one of the borrower sponsors. |
(9) | Loan No. 10 – Residence Inn Irvine – The Mortgaged Property is subject to a ground lease with The Carter Family Investment Partnership, L.P., as the ground lessor, dated as of March 1, 1999, that has an expiration of December 31, 2029 with four 30-year extension options. The current rent due under the ground lease is approximately $425,325 per annum, which is adjusted every year by multiplying the monthly rent for the previous lease year by the consumer price index. |
Loan No. 11 – GNL Industrial Portfolio – The 815 Industrial Parkway Mortgaged Property and the 911 Industrial Parkway Mortgaged Property are each subject to 99-year ground leases with Northern Community Investment Corporation, as the ground lessor, with expirations on December 31, 2113 and October 1, 2116, respectively. The annual rent due under each ground lease is $6,000 per year through expiration. The ground lessor has executed the mortgage and, accordingly, both the fee and leasehold interests serve as collateral for the Mortgage Loan.
Loan No. 18 – 1990 NASA Boulevard – The Mortgaged Property is subject to a ground lease with the City of Melbourne Airport Authority, as the ground lessor, dated as of February 26, 1999, that has an expiration of April 30, 2057 with one five-year extension option, which would extend the term of the lease through April 30, 2062. The annual rent due under the ground lease is approximately $306,000.
Loan No. 29 – Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport – The Mortgaged Property is subject to a ground lease with the Wichita Airport Authority, as the ground lessor, dated as of July 1, 2014, that has an expiration of June 30, 2044 with two 10-year extension options. The current rent due under the ground lease is approximately $56,223 per annum through June 2018. From July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019, ground rent is equal to the greater of 1.0% of gross revenues or $56,223 per annum. From July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2041, ground rent is equal to the greater of 1.0% of gross revenues or 85.0% of the ground rent in the previous year, but not less than $56,223 per annum. From July 1, 2041 to June 30, 2044, ground rent is equal to the greater of 3.5% of gross revenues or 85.0% of the ground rent in the previous year, but not less than $56,223 per annum.
(10) | Loan No. 24 – Concord Place – The third largest tenant, Hannay Investment Properties, which occupies approximately 7.7% of the NRA, is a wholly-owned affiliate of the borrower sponsor. The related lease is fully guaranteed by the borrower sponsor’s trust. |
Loan No. 32 – Tarzana Village – The second largest tenant at the Tarzana Village Mortgaged Property, Gelt Inc., is an affiliate of the guarantors. This lease is fully guaranteed by the guarantors.
A-1-32
(11) | Loan No. 2 – Tryad Industrial & Business Center – The second largest tenant, Harris Corporation (formerly ITT Space Systems), may terminate its lease with respect to up to 50.0% of its 107,283 SF lease after September 1, 2018 with 180 days’ prior notice. The third largest tenant, Kodak Alaris, has a termination option anytime on or after December 31, 2025 with one-year notice and the payment of a termination fee. The fourth largest tenant, Maximus, has an ongoing termination option if their contract with the government has been terminated, materially altered or permitted to expire, subject to a termination fee. |
Loan No. 3 – CrossPoint – The second largest tenant, Verizon New England, has the right to terminate up to 219,561 SF of its space effective on December 31, 2020 and/or 92,380 SF of its space effective May 31, 2021 by giving notice by December 31, 2019, subject to a termination fee of $10,200,000 (assuming both rights are exercised). The fifth largest tenant, United States of America (GSA) – IRS may terminate its lease at any time after June 1, 2021 by giving 180 days’ notice.
Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – The third largest tenant at the 200 Park Place Mortgaged Property, Santander Bank, N.A., has a one-time right to terminate effective as of November 2024, upon notice no later than November 2023 and a termination payment of $1,123,188.
Loan No. 15 – The Offices at Sam Houston – Caterpillar Inc., the largest tenant (88.9% of NRA), is permitted to reduce its leased space by up to one full floor (limited to contiguous areas on any one floor leased solely to Caterpillar, Inc.) on September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2026 by providing twelve (12) months’ prior written notice and paying unamortized costs to the related borrower. Unamortized costs are to be approximately (i) $46.85 PSF, as of September 30, 2024 and (ii) $32.14 PSF, as of September 30, 2026. Caterpillar may not reduce its leased premises by more than one full floor in the aggregate. Caterpillar leases 12,184 SF of the 1st floor and the entirety of the 2nd floor (27,748 SF), 3rd floor (28,239 SF) and 4th floor (28,320 SF) at the Mortgaged Property.
Loan No. 16 – Braemar Office Park – The second largest tenant, Federal Air Marshall Service, may terminate its lease, upon 120 days’ prior written notice, if the tenant does not receive governmental appropriations. The fifth largest tenant, Albin Acquisition Corporation, may terminate its lease on July 31, 2023 with nine months’ notice and a termination fee in sum of $141,702.86.
Loan No. 20 – The Village at La Orilla – The largest tenant, Flix Brewhouse, can terminate the lease effective December 2026 if sales for the prior year do not exceed $7,444,549.
Loan No. 25 – Fortuna Center Plaza – The fifth largest tenant, Virginia ABC Store, may terminate its lease, upon three months’ prior written notice, if the Virginia General Assembly fails to appropriate funds for the lease.
Loan No. 28 – 10 Park Place South – The largest tenant, Fulton County, can terminate the lease in any year if the Fulton County Board of Commissioners fails to appropriate funds to pay the lease, the tenant provides notice of termination by August 31 of that year and the tenant pays a termination fee.
Loan No. 35 – National NNN Retail Portfolio – The second largest tenant at the Durham Retail Mortgaged Property, Starbucks, has the right to terminate its lease effective May 31, 2021 with 180 days’ written notice and payment of a termination fee equal to the sum of (a) the remaining unamortized portion of $75,000, and (b) the remaining unamortized balance of broker fees. The third largest tenant at the Joliet Retail Mortgaged Property, AT&T, has the right to terminate its lease on November 30, 2024 with 180 days’ written notice.
Loan No. 53 – Lauderdale Manor – The third largest tenant, Citi Trends, has the right to terminate its lease during the third lease year if the tenant’s gross sales are less than $1,500,000 for the 25th through 36th full calendar months by providing at least 90 days’ prior written notice to the borrower and paying a termination fee of approximately $152,000.
Loan No. 56 – 100 Fairfield – The largest tenant, Department of Children and Families, has the right to terminate its lease effective August 31, 2024 with twelve months’ written notice. The termination option can only be exercised if the Department of Children and Families has lost funding to support its operation. The second largest tenant, Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services has the right to terminate its lease effective October 12, 2021 with six months’ written notice.
Loan No. 61 – Walgreens – Harlingen, TX – The sole tenant, Walgreens, may terminate its lease effective July 31, 2032 by giving 12 months’ notice. The actual lease expiration date is July 31, 2082. The related Mortgage Loan matures on February 1, 2028.
Loan No. 62 – Clarksville Shops – The fifth largest tenant, Indiana National Guard, may terminate its lease during the lease term upon 60 days’ prior written notice without penalty to the tenant.
Loan No. 63 – Walgreens – Dallas, GA – The sole tenant, Walgreens, may terminate its lease effective October 31, 2031 by giving 12 months’ notice. The actual lease expiration date is October 31, 2081. The related Mortgage Loan matures on February 1, 2028.
Loan No. 64 – Walgreens – Guthrie, OK – The sole tenant, Walgreens, may terminate its lease effective July 31, 2032 by giving 12 months’ notice. The actual lease expiration date is July 31, 2082. The related Mortgage Loan matures on February 1, 2028.
A-1-33
(12) | Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – The fourth largest tenant, Level 3 Communication, LLC, subleases its 34,908 SF space to Armada Healthcare LLC at $16.00 PSF as well as increases in operating expenses over the base year of 2016 through March 31, 2020. |
Loan No. 12 – BlueLinx Portfolio – The largest tenant at the BlueLinx Butner Mortgaged Property, BlueLinx Corporation, subleases 104,000 SF of its space to Cormetech, Inc. at $2.25 PSF. The largest tenant at the BlueLinx Frederick Mortgaged Property, BlueLinx Corporation, subleases 100,000 SF of its space to Carter-Jones Lumber at $5.20 PSF. The subtenant has two, 6-year renewal options.
Loan No. 25 – Fortuna Center Plaza – The second largest tenant, Walgreens, assigned its original ground lease to Royal Skies, LLC, a developer who constructed the existing improvements and subsequently subleased back to Rite Aid. Under its sub-lease, Rite Aid is responsible for paying rent to Royal Skies, LLC as well as the current ground rent of $18.90 PSF on a triple net basis due under the prime lease to the related borrower.
(13) | Occupancy reflects tenants that have signed leases, but are not yet in occupancy or may not be paying rent. |
Loan No. 1 – AFIN Portfolio – The second largest tenant at the Jefferson Commons Mortgaged Property, Aldi, took occupancy on February 12, 2018 and will begin paying rent on July 4, 2018.
Loan No. 2 – Tryad Industrial & Business Center – The third largest tenant, Kodak Alaris, executed a lease in July 2017 for ten years and four months. The tenant is expected to take occupancy of a portion of its space in March 2018 and of its remaining space in May 2018. At origination, the borrower deposited (i) approximately $9.2 million into a TI/LC Reserve of which approximately $8.7 million is earmarked for Kodak Alaris and (ii) approximately $1.9 million into a Free Rent Reserve earmarked for Kodak Alaris.
Loan No. 3 – CrossPoint – The largest tenant, Kronos Incorporated, leased an additional 37,554 SF suite in December 2016. The tenant is currently in its free rent period for this suite. It is anticipated that the tenant will take occupancy of this space in October 2018.
Loan No. 7 – City Square and Clay Street – The third largest tenant, Kaiser Foundation Health, is expected to take full occupancy on March 1, 2018 and to begin paying rent on October 1, 2018. At origination, $812,214 was reserved in respect of free rent.
Loan No. 15 – The Offices at Sam Houston – The largest tenant, Caterpillar Inc., representing approximately 88.9% of the NRA, is in the process of building out an expansion space of 27,728 SF at the Mortgaged Property. The second largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., representing approximately 11.1% of the NRA, is in the process of building out and relocating its space at the Mortgaged Property. Each tenant is expected to complete and take occupancy of its respective spaces in April 2018. At origination, the lender reserved $2,907,270 for outstanding Caterpillar, Inc. tenant improvement costs and $473,076 for outstanding IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. tenant improvement costs. Also at origination, the lender reserved (i) $143,665 for Caterpillar Inc. rent, to be released to borrower upon Caterpillar, Inc being in occupancy of the expansion space and paying full, unabated rent for its entire space and (ii) $82,088 for IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. rent, to be released to borrower upon IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. being in occupancy of its new space and paying full, unabated rent for its space.
Loan No. 22 – Yorkshire & Lexington Towers – The largest retail tenant at the Yorkshire Towers Mortgaged Property, CVS Pharmacy, is in the process of finishing the build-out of its space within the Yorkshire Towers Mortgaged Property and the tenant is expected to open for business in May 2018. The landlord has no remaining tenant improvement obligations and the tenant is paying rent.
Loan No. 28 – 10 Park Place South – The fourth largest tenant, Milk & Tea, is currently building out its space, which is expected to be completed in April 2018. At origination, $55,000 was reserved for Milk & Tea’s outstanding tenant improvement obligations.
Loan No. 35 – National NNN Retail Portfolio – The third largest tenant at the Joliet Retail Mortgaged Property, AT&T, took possession of its space on December 1, 2017. It is currently building out its space at the expense of the borrower and is expected to move in by March 1, 2018. At origination, $52,675 was reserved in respect of two months of free rent and a late charge for the failure of the seller to deliver the space by August 1, 2017.
(14) | Loan No. 20 – The Village at La Orilla – At origination, $622,968 was reserved for remaining free rent and outstanding TI/LC obligations in connection with three tenants who were not in occupancy. Such tenants, which lease approximately 7.1% of the NRA collectively, have executed leases with no termination options. The reserve funds will be released once the tenants take occupancy and begin paying full, unabated rent. |
A-1-34
Loan No. 22 – Yorkshire & Lexington Towers – A Holdback Reserve in the amount of $4,102,064 was escrowed at origination. As of October 24, 2017, one disbursement in the amount of $1,540,192 was made to the borrower from the Holdback Reserve account. If no event of default exists, then at any time the amounts in the Holdback Reserve account exceed an amount equal to five times the difference of (x) $38,000,000 and (y) gross income from operations of the Mortgaged Properties (the “Threshold Amount”), then all amounts on deposit in the Holdback Reserve account in excess of the Threshold Amount will be (i) during the continuation of a Cash Management Trigger Event, transferred to the Cash Management Account, or (ii) in the absence of a Cash Management Trigger Event, returned to the borrower. Upon the full repayment of the Yorkshire & Lexington Towers Whole Loan or a defeasance in full, the reserve will be applied first to the Mezzanine A Loan, then, if the Mezzanine A Loan has been repaid in full, to the Mezzanine B Loan, and finally, if both Mezzanine loans have been repaid in full, to the borrower.
(15) | Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – The borrower is required to escrow on each monthly payment date commencing in February 2027 through and including the monthly payment date in November 2027, $2,437 for environmental insurance coverage. |
(16) | Loan No. 29 – Hampton Inn & Suites Wichita Airport – The borrower will deposit to lender on each payment date an amount equal to the greater of (i) (A) through and including the 12th payment date, $0.00, (B) from and including the 13th payment date until and including the 24th payment date, 1/12 of 2.0% of the annual gross revenues of the Mortgaged Property for the previous 12 month period as determined on the anniversary of the loan closing date, and (C) from and including the 25th payment date for the remainder of the term of the Mortgage Loan, 1/12 of 4.0% of the annual gross revenues of the Mortgaged Property for the previous 12th month period as determined on the anniversary of the loan closing date, or (ii) the monthly amount required to be reserved pursuant to the franchise agreement for the replacement of FF&E but excluding any amounts attributable to a PIP. |
Loan No. 34 – Dorset & Market Street – In the event that during the loan term, any of the B&N tax waiver conditions (no Event of Default, the Barnes & Noble Lease (“B&N Lease”) is in full force and effect, no default has occurred under the B&N Lease, Barnes & Noble continues to be obligated to pay and does pay all taxes directly) are not satisfied, the calculation of the monthly tax reserve will be adjusted to include taxes attributable to the Lot 2 individual property.
(17) | Loan No. 5 – Moore Plaza – The Phase I environmental report dated September 19, 2017 identified historical use of a portion of the Mortgaged Property as an on-site dry cleaner and recommended a Phase II environmental report. A limited subsurface investigation report dated November 28, 2017 recommended entering the Mortgaged Property into the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The environmental condition relating to the dry cleaner is expected to be remediated by the borrower under TCEQ supervision. Additionally, the borrower obtained an environmental impairment liability (“EIL”) insurance policy, from Beazley (Lloyd’s of London Syndicates 623/2623) (rated “A” by A.M. Best), which lists the borrower as the first named insured and the lender, with its successors, assigns, and/or affiliates as additional named insured. The EIL policy has a term of 121 months, with an optional extended reporting period of 36 months, policy limits of $2,000,000 per incident and in the aggregate, with a $100,000 deductible per incident. The policy premium was paid at origination, and the borrower is required to deposit $3,000 each January during the term of the Mortgage Loan into an environmental remediation reserve account. |
Loan No. 8 – University Properties Portfolio – The ESA reported that the Mortgaged Property is located in EPA designated Radon Zone 1, in which the average predicted radon levels are expected to be at or above the EPA residential action level of 4.0 pCi/L. Several rounds of radon testing were conducted in the ground floor units of each of the buildings on the Mortgaged Property, and samples collected from 73 of those units indicated radon concentrations above 4.0 pCi/L. Based on the testing results and the recommendation in the ESA, the installation and activation of a radon mitigation system was required in each building located on the Mortgaged Property in which elevated concentrations of radon was identified in the ESA. At origination, the lender reserved $451,250, which equals 125.0% of the estimated cost of such mitigation system.
Loan No. 12 – BlueLinx Portfolio – The Phase I reports for the Mortgaged Properties identified as BlueLinx Burner and BlueLinx Lawrenceville each indicated a recognized environmental condition relating to the presence of USTs that were installed in the 1990s. At origination, the borrower reserved approximately 125.0% of the estimated costs for further investigation and the potential decommissioning of the USTs. In the event that such funds are insufficient, the Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to provide additional funds in an amount that results in the total funds reserved equaling approximately 125.0% of the estimated cost to complete any required remediation.
Loan No. 57 – School Street Crossing – A Phase I ESA was performed at the Mortgaged Property, which did not identify any recognized environmental conditions, controlled recognized environmental conditions, or historical recognized environmental conditions. However, since a dry cleaner was operated at the property from 1994 until 2002, a Phase II ESA was performed. The Phase II ESA ultimately concluded that no further investigation was warranted.
(18) | Loan No. 1 – AFIN Portfolio – The ESAs did not note any recognized environmental conditions; however, the ESA for the Shoppes of West Melbourne Mortgaged Property indicated the former presence of a dry cleaner as a business environmental risk. The borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy from Berkeley Specialty Underwriting Managers, which has an A.M. Best rating of A- or better, with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy provides coverage during the term of the Whole Loan and an optional three-year tail. |
A-1-35
Loan No. 3 – CrossPoint – In lieu of an environmental indemnitor, the borrower sponsor provided an environmental insurance policy issued by Beazley Insurance Company Inc. with limits of $5,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy provides coverage during the term of the Whole Loan with a three-year automatic extension option.
Loan No. 6 – Park Place at Florham Park – Although the Phase I reports do not have any identified recognized environmental conditions, the borrower obtained an environmental impairment liability (“EIL”) insurance policy, from Great American Insurance Group, which lists the borrower as the first named insured and the lender, with its successors, assigns, and/or affiliates named as additional named insured (mezzanine lender shall be an additional named insured as well). The coverage parts include both existing conditions coverage as well as new conditions coverage for first-party and third-party claims including a mortgagee insured endorsement for UBS AG to become first named insured in the event of default under the loan agreement. The EIL policy has a term of 10 years with an optional extended reporting period of 36 months, policy limits of $10,000,000 per incident and in the aggregate, with a $50,000 deductible per incident. The premium for the policy of $82,055.40 was paid at origination and the premium for an additional three-year term of tail coverage ($24,373.00 in total) will be swept as a ten-month sweep at $2,437.30 per month and escrowed prior to expiration of the initial ten-year term.
Loan No. 17 – 4851 South Alameda Street – In lieu of an environmental indemnitor, the borrower sponsor provided an environmental insurance policy issued by Great American Insurance Group with limits of $3,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy provides coverage for a 13-year term. The Mortgage Loan has a term of 10 years.
Loan No. 30 – Quakertown Shopping Center – In addition to an environmental indemnity agreement, the borrower sponsor provided an environmental insurance policy issued by Steadfast Insurance Company with limits of $2,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy provides coverage for a 13-year term. The Mortgage Loan has a term of 10 years.
Loan No. 32 – Tarzana Village – The related Phase I ESA identified a recognized environmental condition at the Mortgaged Property related to a 55-gallon steel drum left behind by the former dry-cleaning operation. No leaks or spills were observed in connection with the drum. In connection with the former dry-cleaning use, at origination, the borrower obtained an environmental insurance policy issued by Steadfast Insurance Company with a limit of $1,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy premium has been paid in full.
(19) | For more information see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—Mezzanine Indebtedness”. |
(20) | Loan No. 62 – Clarksville Shops – The third largest tenant, Sweet Frog Frozen Yogurt, has not communicated its intention to renew its lease which expires on March 31, 2018. The income from the tenant was excluded from the underwritten effective gross income, and the space has been considered vacant. At origination, the borrower deposited $37,000 into the Sweet Frog Frozen Yogurt rollover reserve funds account. |
(21) | Loan No. 25 – Fortuna Center Plaza – The TI/LC Reserve will be capped at $235,561 from origination through December 1, 2020 and at $157,041 from January 1, 2021 through maturity. |
Loan No. 62 – Clarksville Shops – The borrower is not required to make the monthly rollover deposit during such times that (i) the balance in the rollover account exceeds $100,000, and (ii) the actual physical occupancy of tenants in place and open for business at the Mortgaged Property equals or exceeds 90.0%.
(22) | Loan No. 1 – AFIN Portfolio – The loan proceeds were used to refinance existing debt of approximately $18.0 million encumbering the San Pedro Crossing Mortgaged Property and recapitalize the borrower sponsor’s recent acquisition of the remaining 11 Mortgaged Properties. |
Loan No. 9 – AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio – The proceeds of the Mortgage Loan were used to recapitalize the borrower sponsor after the purchase the Mortgaged Properties between March 31, 2017 and November 7, 2017.
(23) | Loan No. 35 – National NNN Retail Portfolio – Jose Chacalo Hilu, the guarantor and sponsor of the Mortgage Loan, is a Mexican national. A Mexican enforceability opinion was executed at origination to enforce U.S. law in the event of default. |
(24) | Loan No. 7 – City Square and Clay Street – The third largest tenant, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, is in a free rent period for approximately 6 months from the rent commencement date in March 2018. At origination, $812,214 was reserved in respect of free rent for that tenant, as well as others in a free rent period. |
(25) | Loan No. 28 – 10 Park Place South – The second largest tenant, Grady Health System, has a rent reduction during year 2 of its lease term. At origination, LCF reserved $171,039, which is the difference between the underwritten base rent for Grady Health System and the reduction incorporated in the lease. The fourth largest tenant, Milk & Tea, is currently building out its space, which is expected to be completed in April 2018. At origination, LCF reserved $23,361, which represents three months of gap rent for Milk & Tea. |
(26) | Loan No. 27 – Seal Multifamily Portfolio – The historical occupancies for the individual Mortgaged Properties in this Annex A-1 are representative of the portfolio level occupancy. The individual Mortgaged Properties occupancies were not available. |
A-1-36
(27) | Loan No. 7 – City Square and Clay Street – The NRA of the Mortgaged Property is 246,136 SF, which consists of 151,304 SF of office space, 38,032 SF of retail space and a 56,800 SF full-service fitness gym. In addition, the Mortgaged Property includes a 1,154 space parking garage. |
Loan No. 26 – Firehouse Self Storage – The NRA includes 138 uncovered vehicle parking spaces.
Loan No. 27 – Seal Multifamily Portfolio – The portfolio of Mortgaged Properties includes 314 apartment units, as well as 16,900 SF of retail space and 5,090 SF of office space.
Loan No. 28 – 10 Park Place South – The NRA of the Mortgaged Property is 138,021 SF, which includes 116,749 SF of office space and 21,272 SF of retail space.
Loan No. 48 – Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio – The NRA of the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties is 15,833 SF, which includes twelve apartments units totaling 10,841 SF of multifamily space and 4,992 SF of retail space.
Loan No. 49 – Westhaven Town Center – The NRA of the Mortgaged Property is 33,056 SF, which includes 21,350 SF of office space and 11,706 SF of retail space.
Loan No. 51 – East Sac Self Storage – The NRA includes 48 wine storage units, 36 uncovered vehicle parking spaces and one commercial unit that is rented as a large storage space.
(28) | Loan No. 27 – Seal Multifamily Portfolio – The street addresses of the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties were removed for spacing purposes. The addresses are: |
Norton and Barberton – 3953 & 3954 Mount Vernon Boulevard, 3785-3791, 3839-3859, 3888, 3991-3943 Long Drive, 290-292 Fairmount Avenue and 3757 & 3725 Cleveland-Massillon Road
Stow Apartments – 2371, 2381 & 2393 Graham Road, 2204-2224, 2230 & 2280 Liberty Road and 2386-3908 Genevieve Road
Tallmadge-Clyde Apartments – 515-531 Center Avenue, 1132 Tallmadge Road, 1064-1080 Clyde Avenue, 824-826 Myrtle Avenue and 1170 Tallmadge Road (Commercial)
Firestone Park Apartments – 63, 87 and 101 East Firestone Boulevard
Mogadore-Eastwood Apartments – 2994-3008 Mogadore Road and 2275 Eastwood Avenue
(29) | Loan No. 7 – City Square and Clay Street – The Seismic PML % for the Clay Street Mortgaged Property is 19.0% and the City Square Mortgaged Property is 18.0%. |
(30) | Loan No. 40 – Holiday Inn Express – Ruston – The Insurance Reserve is waived, provided (A) that certain conditions (no event of default is continuing under the Mortgage Loan documents and the borrower maintains insurance under a blanket policy) remain satisfied. |
Loan No. 52 – Canyon Gate Self Storage – All reserves are conditionally waived, provided, among other things, (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing and (ii) the Mortgaged Property achieves a debt yield of at least 8.0%.
Loan No. 61 – Walgreens – Harlingen, TX – The related borrower is required to commence making monthly deposits into the Tax, Insurance, Replacement and TI/LC Reserves if any of the following conditions are no longer met: (i) an event of default has not occurred and is no longer continuing and (ii) (a) in the case of the Tax Reserve, Walgreens is required to pay real estate taxes, (b) in the case of the Insurance Reserve, Walgreens is maintaining its insurance coverage under a policy acceptable to lender, (c) in the case of the Replacement Reserve, Walgreens is responsible for paying for on-going physical improvements and the physical condition of the Mortgaged Property is reasonably maintained and (d) in the case of the TI/LC Reserve, Walgreens’ credit rating is investment grade.
Loan No. 63 – Walgreens – Dallas, GA – The related borrower is required to commence making monthly deposits into the Tax, Insurance, Replacement and TI/LC Reserves if any of the following conditions are no longer met: (i) an event of default has not occurred and is no longer continuing and (ii) (a) in the case of the Tax Reserve, Walgreens is required to pay real estate taxes, (b) in the case of the Insurance Reserve, Walgreens is maintaining its insurance coverage under a policy acceptable to lender, (c) in the case of the Replacement Reserve, Walgreens is responsible for paying for on-going physical improvements and the physical condition of the Mortgaged Property is reasonably maintained and (d) in the case of the TI/LC Reserve, Walgreens’ credit rating is investment grade.
Loan No. 64 – Walgreens – Guthrie, OK – The related borrower is required to commence making monthly deposits into the Tax, Insurance, Replacement and TI/LC Reserves if any of the following conditions are no longer met: (i) an event of default has not occurred and is no longer continuing and (ii) (a) in the case of the Tax Reserve, Walgreens is required to pay real estate taxes, (b) in the case of the Insurance Reserve, Walgreens is maintaining its insurance coverage under a policy acceptable to lender, (c) in the case of the Replacement Reserve, Walgreens is responsible for paying for on-going physical improvements and the physical condition of the Mortgaged Property is reasonably maintained and (d) in the case of the TI/LC Reserve, Walgreens’ credit rating is investment grade.
A-1-37
(31) | Loan No. 16 – Braemar Office Park – The U/W TI/LC is inclusive of a straight-line credit for the upfront TI/LC Reserve equal to $60,000, which is 10.0% of the upfront TI/LC Reserve of $600,000. |
(32) | Loan No. 3 – CrossPoint – The initial nonrecourse carveout guarantors are Samuel T. Byrne and Brian Chaisson (the “Initial Guarantors”) on a joint and several basis. The CrossPoint Whole Loan documents provide that one or more of the Initial Guarantors may be replaced from time to time by a replacement guarantor, subject to certain conditions in the Whole Loan documents. In connection with the origination of the CrossPoint Whole Loan, Lighthouse Real Estate Holdings LLC (“Lighthouse”) contributed $82.1 million to the borrower in exchange for a 91.73% equity interest. Lighthouse has the right to buy out the interest of the Initial Guarantors. Lighthouse has been pre-approved as a replacement guarantor, provided there is no material and adverse change with respect to Lighthouse as of the date of the replacement of one or more of the Initial Guarantors. |
A-1-38
ANNEX A-2
MORTGAGE POOL INFORMATION (TABLES)
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
UBS 2018-C8
OVERVIEW OF MORTGAGE POOL CHARACTERISTICS |
Distribution of Cut-off Date Balances | |||||||||||
Weighted Averages | |||||||||||
Range of Cut-off Date Balances | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate
Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated
Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) |
U/W
NCF DSCR(1)(2) |
Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | |||
$896,000 | - | $10,000,000 | 33 | $190,119,922 | 18.2% | 5.050% | 112 | 1.66x | 62.2% | 55.8% | |
$10,000,001 | - | $15,000,000 | 13 | $166,574,611 | 15.9% | 4.566% | 113 | 1.99x | 57.9% | 52.2% | |
$15,000,001 | - | $20,000,000 | 5 | $80,633,103 | 7.7% | 4.963% | 120 | 1.64x | 62.9% | 56.7% | |
$20,000,001 | - | $25,000,000 | 3 | $67,300,000 | 6.4% | 4.475% | 119 | 1.51x | 67.4% | 59.0% | |
$25,000,001 | - | $30,000,000 | 2 | $53,950,000 | 5.2% | 4.503% | 88 | 2.19x | 62.5% | 62.5% | |
$30,000,001 | - | $35,000,000 | 4 | $133,650,000 | 12.8% | 4.430% | 118 | 2.54x | 56.2% | 56.2% | |
$35,000,001 | - | $45,000,000 | 2 | $90,000,000 | 8.6% | 4.905% | 120 | 1.78x | 57.4% | 57.4% | |
$45,000,001 | - | $50,000,000 | 3 | $146,500,000 | 14.0% | 4.804% | 120 | 1.98x | 59.5% | 56.1% | |
$50,000,001 | - | $60,000,000 | 2 | $116,440,256 | 11.1% | 4.593% | 119 | 1.89x | 54.6% | 50.1% | |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Distribution of Mortgage Rates | ||||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||||
Range of Mortgage Rates | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate
Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated
Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) |
U/W
NCF DSCR(1)(2) |
Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | ||
2.7400% | - | 4.0000% | 1 | $15,000,000 | 1.4% | 2.740% | 56 | 4.28x | 22.5% | 22.5% |
4.0001% | - | 4.2500% | 3 | $97,400,000 | 9.3% | 4.141% | 119 | 2.50x | 54.5% | 54.5% |
4.2501% | - | 4.5000% | 7 | $133,900,000 | 12.8% | 4.390% | 107 | 2.21x | 60.5% | 56.2% |
4.5001% | - | 4.7500% | 16 | $359,612,500 | 34.4% | 4.639% | 119 | 1.98x | 59.0% | 57.5% |
4.7501% | - | 5.0000% | 18 | $155,328,844 | 14.9% | 4.884% | 119 | 1.71x | 63.1% | 56.1% |
5.0001% | - | 5.2500% | 16 | $240,536,073 | 23.0% | 5.105% | 119 | 1.52x | 61.1% | 53.9% |
5.2501% | - | 5.5000% | 2 | $12,740,475 | 1.2% | 5.320% | 119 | 1.27x | 72.1% | 60.7% |
5.5001% | - | 6.1600% | 4 | $30,650,000 | 2.9% | 5.948% | 75 | 1.53x | 59.4% | 53.3% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Property Type Distribution(1) | |||||||||||
Weighted Averages | |||||||||||
Property Type | Number
of Mortgage Properties |
Aggregate
Cut-Off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Number
of Units/Rooms/Pads/ NRA/Beds |
Cut-off
Date Balance per Unit/Room/Pads NRA(1)(2) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | Occupancy | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Office | 15 | $249,950,000 | 23.9% | 2,878,585 | $151 | 4.759% | 120 | 94.7% | 1.86x | 63.0% | 59.5% |
Suburban | 11 | $206,000,000 | 19.7% | 2,618,684 | $135 | 4.731% | 120 | 95.5% | 1.95x | 62.8% | 60.5% |
Medical | 3 | $31,200,000 | 3.0% | 121,880 | $280 | 4.892% | 119 | 93.7% | 1.53x | 61.1% | 55.2% |
CBD | 1 | $12,750,000 | 1.2% | 138,021 | $92 | 4.885% | 119 | 83.1% | 1.32x | 69.7% | 53.4% |
Retail | 49 | $243,124,046 | 23.3% | 3,849,338 | $141 | 4.570% | 119 | 96.8% | 2.00x | 62.0% | 58.3% |
Anchored | 20 | $171,923,773 | 16.4% | 3,354,028 | $123 | 4.527% | 119 | 95.5% | 2.06x | 61.6% | 58.9% |
Free-Standing | 23 | $47,209,798 | 4.5% | 399,939 | $119 | 4.465% | 119 | 100.0% | 2.08x | 59.7% | 55.9% |
Shadow Anchored | 4 | $16,983,709 | 1.6% | 56,671 | $335 | 5.039% | 119 | 100.0% | 1.39x | 66.8% | 56.8% |
Unanchored | 2 | $7,006,765 | 0.7% | 38,700 | $253 | 5.190% | 120 | 100.0% | 1.42x | 74.1% | 61.3% |
Industrial | 25 | $215,791,708 | 20.6% | 8,985,497 | $46 | 4.760% | 112 | 90.4% | 1.88x | 56.6% | 50.5% |
Warehouse/Distribution | 21 | $139,244,652 | 13.3% | 5,348,752 | $51 | 4.718% | 108 | 98.1% | 1.94x | 58.8% | 53.2% |
Flex | 1 | $56,440,256 | 5.4% | 3,353,230 | $33 | 5.021% | 119 | 68.1% | 1.42x | 52.6% | 43.3% |
Flex/R&D | 1 | $13,341,000 | 1.3% | 127,105 | $52 | 4.320% | 120 | 100.0% | 2.76x | 52.3% | 52.3% |
Light Industrial | 1 | $4,098,300 | 0.4% | 58,546 | $52 | 4.320% | 120 | 100.0% | 2.76x | 52.3% | 52.3% |
Manufacturing | 1 | $2,667,500 | 0.3% | 97,864 | $52 | 4.320% | 120 | 100.0% | 2.76x | 52.3% | 52.3% |
Multifamily | 13 | $90,100,000 | 8.6% | 1,955 | $123,024 | 4.511% | 103 | 96.5% | 2.13x | 54.0% | 51.6% |
Garden | 9 | $38,287,500 | 3.7% | 780 | $68,630 | 5.012% | 109 | 95.5% | 1.51x | 61.5% | 55.9% |
Student Housing | 1 | $34,500,000 | 3.3% | 342 | $100,877 | 4.690% | 115 | 99.7% | 1.95x | 58.8% | 58.8% |
High Rise | 2 | $15,000,000 | 1.4% | 827 | $241,838 | 2.740% | 56 | 92.0% | 4.28x | 22.5% | 22.5% |
Mid Rise | 1 | $2,312,500 | 0.2% | 6 | $583,333 | 5.023% | 119 | 95.1% | 1.35x | 62.5% | 62.5% |
Mixed Use | 7 | $83,725,522 | 8.0% | 508,199 | $32,924 | 4.773% | 120 | 91.4% | 1.71x | 54.3% | 51.7% |
Office/Garage/Retail | 1 | $45,000,000 | 4.3% | 246,136 | $366 | 4.728% | 120 | 94.2% | 1.76x | 49.7% | 49.7% |
Retail/Office | 2 | $22,988,022 | 2.2% | 143,333 | $183 | 4.803% | 118 | 84.8% | 1.71x | 58.6% | 53.1% |
Medical/Office/Retail | 1 | $6,550,000 | 0.6% | 33,056 | $198 | 4.805% | 120 | 92.0% | 1.69x | 61.5% | 55.4% |
Multifamily/Retail | 2 | $4,687,500 | 0.4% | 6 | $583,333 | 5.023% | 119 | 95.1% | 1.35x | 62.5% | 62.5% |
Office/Retail | 1 | $4,500,000 | 0.4% | 85,668 | $53 | 4.768% | 120 | 91.6% | 1.60x | 58.4% | 47.7% |
Hospitality | 9 | $82,392,296 | 7.9% | 886 | $141,303 | 5.011% | 114 | 79.0% | 2.19x | 62.4% | 55.6% |
Limited Service | 6 | $41,892,296 | 4.0% | 470 | $122,963 | 5.139% | 119 | 72.9% | 1.91x | 65.9% | 53.5% |
Extended Stay | 3 | $40,500,000 | 3.9% | 416 | $160,273 | 4.879% | 109 | 85.3% | 2.49x | 58.7% | 57.8% |
Self Storage | 6 | $47,584,320 | 4.6% | 662,596 | $79 | 4.787% | 119 | 87.9% | 1.97x | 53.6% | 52.7% |
Manufactured Housing Community | 2 | $32,500,000 | 3.1% | 578 | $61,215 | 5.007% | 103 | 93.6% | 1.26x | 64.6% | 59.8% |
Total/Weighted Average | 126 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 92.6% | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Please see footnotes on page A-2-4.
A-2-1 |
UBS 2018-C8
OVERVIEW OF MORTGAGE POOL CHARACTERISTICS |
Geographic Distribution(1) | ||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||
State/Location | Number
of Mortgage Properties |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
California | 10 | $162,300,000 | 15.5% | 4.811% | 116 | 1.87x | 55.1% | 53.9% |
California - Southern (4) | 6 | $98,800,000 | 9.5% | 4.895% | 114 | 1.91x | 57.7% | 55.7% |
California - Northern (4) | 4 | $63,500,000 | 6.1% | 4.680% | 120 | 1.81x | 51.0% | 51.0% |
Texas | 7 | $136,442,813 | 13.1% | 4.826% | 117 | 1.80x | 59.9% | 54.4% |
New York | 15 | $92,564,321 | 8.9% | 4.565% | 109 | 1.96x | 50.3% | 43.9% |
Indiana | 5 | $60,350,000 | 5.8% | 4.833% | 117 | 1.73x | 62.3% | 57.7% |
Massachusetts | 2 | $59,327,500 | 5.7% | 4.692% | 111 | 2.27x | 60.7% | 60.7% |
Other | 87 | $534,183,258 | 51.1% | 4.690% | 116 | 1.94x | 61.9% | 57.3% |
Total/Weighted Average | 126 | 1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Distribution of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||||
Range of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | ||
22.5% | - | 35.0% | 2 | $19,000,000 | 1.8% | 3.010% | 69 | 3.87x | 25.0% | 25.0% |
35.1% | - | 45.0% | 1 | $6,000,000 | 0.6% | 4.374% | 120 | 3.42x | 39.3% | 39.3% |
45.1% | - | 55.0% | 11 | $234,474,576 | 22.4% | 4.728% | 116 | 1.95x | 52.0% | 49.0% |
55.1% | - | 60.0% | 13 | $284,642,750 | 27.2% | 4.652% | 119 | 2.04x | 58.2% | 55.6% |
60.1% | - | 65.0% | 19 | $283,368,671 | 27.1% | 4.767% | 112 | 1.93x | 62.1% | 58.6% |
65.1% | - | 70.0% | 12 | $140,963,250 | 13.5% | 4.974% | 119 | 1.54x | 67.5% | 59.9% |
70.1% | - | 75.0% | 9 | $76,718,645 | 7.3% | 4.808% | 119 | 1.47x | 73.2% | 63.3% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Distribution of Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratios(1)(2)(3) | ||||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||||
Range of LTV Ratios at Maturity or ARD | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | ||
22.5% | - | 45.0% | 6 | $97,274,576 | 9.3% | 4.548% | 109 | 2.06x | 46.1% | 39.6% |
45.1% | - | 55.0% | 20 | $316,318,671 | 30.3% | 4.769% | 117 | 1.89x | 56.4% | 51.0% |
55.1% | - | 60.0% | 19 | $340,203,170 | 32.6% | 4.673% | 119 | 1.92x | 61.3% | 57.9% |
60.1% | - | 65.0% | 16 | $224,090,475 | 21.4% | 4.730% | 110 | 1.98x | 64.6% | 61.8% |
65.1% | - | 70.0% | 6 | $67,281,000 | 6.4% | 5.002% | 120 | 1.68x | 67.6% | 65.7% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Distribution of Underwritten NCF Debt Service Coverage Ratios(1)(2) | |||||||||||
Weighted Averages | |||||||||||
Range of Underwritten NCF Debt Service Coverage Ratios | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | |||
1.25x | - | 1.35x | 8 | $90,565,475 | 8.7% | 5.055% | 113 | 1.28x | 66.6% | 58.8% | |
1.36x | - | 1.45x | 8 | $169,673,349 | 16.2% | 5.053% | 119 | 1.41x | 59.9% | 50.3% | |
1.46x | - | 1.55x | 7 | $52,575,522 | 5.0% | 4.812% | 118 | 1.51x | 65.8% | 56.9% | |
1.56x | - | 1.65x | 8 | $67,944,060 | 6.5% | 4.908% | 114 | 1.59x | 62.6% | 53.9% | |
1.66x | - | 1.75x | 9 | $82,268,500 | 7.9% | 4.599% | 120 | 1.70x | 59.6% | 53.4% | |
1.76x | - | 1.85x | 4 | $110,500,000 | 10.6% | 4.971% | 116 | 1.79x | 56.9% | 56.6% | |
1.86x | - | 1.95x | 8 | $108,111,647 | 10.3% | 4.723% | 118 | 1.91x | 60.7% | 59.0% | |
1.96x | - | 2.05x | 2 | $11,092,750 | 1.1% | 4.524% | 119 | 2.01x | 59.1% | 59.1% | |
2.06x | - | 2.30x | 3 | $109,886,589 | 10.5% | 4.667% | 120 | 2.26x | 60.6% | 59.3% | |
2.31x | - | 2.55x | 4 | $108,900,000 | 10.4% | 4.367% | 104 | 2.40x | 58.3% | 58.3% | |
2.56x | - | 4.28x | 6 | $133,650,000 | 12.8% | 4.180% | 113 | 2.93x | 51.5% | 51.5% | |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Please see footnotes on page A-2-4.
A-2-2 |
UBS 2018-C8
OVERVIEW OF MORTGAGE POOL CHARACTERISTICS |
Original Terms to Maturity or ARD | ||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||
Original
Terms to Maturity or ARD |
Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
60 | 5 | $66,350,000 | 6.3% | 4.623% | 59 | 2.55x | 52.1% | 51.2% |
120 | 62 | $978,817,892 | 93.7% | 4.731% | 119 | 1.88x | 60.0% | 55.7% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Distribution of Remaining Terms to Maturity or ARD | ||||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||||
Range
of Remaining Terms to Maturity or ARD |
Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | ||
56 | - | 118 | 13 | $158,224,990 | 15.1% | 4.722% | 92 | 2.04x | 57.0% | 54.5% |
119 | - | 120 | 54 | $886,942,901 | 84.9% | 4.724% | 120 | 1.90x | 60.0% | 55.6% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Distribution of Underwritten NOI Debt Yields(1)(2) | ||||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||||
Range of Underwritten NOI Debt Yields | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | ||
7.0% | - | 8.5% | 6 | $69,475,000 | 6.6% | 4.915% | 111 | 1.39x | 62.4% | 59.1% |
8.6% | - | 9.0% | 9 | $112,192,077 | 10.7% | 4.921% | 120 | 1.54x | 59.6% | 55.1% |
9.1% | - | 9.5% | 6 | $52,246,820 | 5.0% | 4.675% | 118 | 1.75x | 60.0% | 56.8% |
9.6% | - | 10.0% | 11 | $124,142,750 | 11.9% | 4.788% | 118 | 1.72x | 61.3% | 56.8% |
10.1% | - | 10.5% | 7 | $123,480,926 | 11.8% | 4.822% | 119 | 1.53x | 58.6% | 51.0% |
10.6% | - | 11.0% | 4 | $109,688,022 | 10.5% | 5.102% | 120 | 1.60x | 62.3% | 56.1% |
11.1% | - | 11.5% | 6 | $145,094,060 | 13.9% | 4.410% | 119 | 2.14x | 61.1% | 58.5% |
11.6% | - | 12.0% | 2 | $65,000,000 | 6.2% | 4.274% | 105 | 2.71x | 51.3% | 51.3% |
12.1% | - | 12.5% | 6 | $128,900,000 | 12.3% | 4.386% | 104 | 2.51x | 56.7% | 55.3% |
12.6% | - | 16.2% | 10 | $114,948,236 | 11.0% | 4.931% | 116 | 2.26x | 59.5% | 54.2% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Amortization Types | ||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||
Amortization Type | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) | Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Full IO | 28 | $593,792,750 | 56.8% | 4.569% | 114 | 2.24x | 56.9% | 56.9% |
Amortizing | 19 | $248,144,142 | 23.7% | 5.080% | 116 | 1.54x | 60.8% | 50.2% |
Partial IO | 17 | $200,462,500 | 19.2% | 4.733% | 119 | 1.46x | 65.4% | 57.3% |
Full IO, ARD | 3 | $2,768,500 | 0.3% | 5.200% | 120 | 1.69x | 70.0% | 70.0% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Loan Purposes | ||||||||
Weighted Averages | ||||||||
Loan Purpose | Number
of Mortgage Loans |
Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance |
%
of Initial Outstanding Pool Balance(1) |
Mortgage Rate | Stated Remaining Term (Mos.)(6) | U/W NCF DSCR(1)(2) | Cut-off
Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Maturity
Date or ARD LTV Ratio(1)(2)(3) |
Refinance | 36 | $515,571,417 | 49.3% | 4.813% | 115 | 1.80x | 58.8% | 54.0% |
Acquisition | 29 | $420,596,475 | 40.2% | 4.642% | 116 | 2.07x | 61.0% | 57.9% |
Recapitalization(5) | 2 | $109,000,000 | 10.4% | 4.618% | 119 | 1.94x | 57.3% | 52.8% |
Total/Weighted Average | 67 | $1,045,167,892 | 100.0% | 4.724% | 115 | 1.92x | 59.5% | 55.4% |
Please see footnotes on page A-2-4.
A-2-3 |
UBS 2018-C8
OVERVIEW OF MORTGAGE POOL CHARACTERISTICS |
(1) | All numerical information concerning the mortgage loans is approximate and, in the case of mortgage loans secured by multiple properties, is based on allocated loan amounts with respect to such properties. All weighted average information regarding the mortgage loans reflects the weighting of the mortgage loans based on their outstanding principal balances as of the Cut-off Date or, in the case of mortgage loans secured by multiple properties, allocated loan amounts. The sum of numbers and percentages in columns may not match the “Total” due to rounding. |
(2) | With respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a whole loan, unless otherwise indicated, Balance per Unit/Room/Pad/NRA, LTV, DSCR and Debt Yield calculations include any related pari passu companion loans and exclude any subordinate companion loans, as applicable. Additionally, Balance per Unit/Room/Pad/NRA, LTV, DSCR and Debt Yield figures are calculated for mortgage loans without regard to any additional indebtedness that may be incurred at a future date. |
(3) | With respect to the whole loan secured by the mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as Park Place at Florham Park, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio, and appraised value are based on the alternate market “As-Is” appraised value of $96,000,000 as of December 4, 2017, which assumes that outstanding landlord obligations for free rent, tenant improvements, and leasing commissions are fully funded and escrowed by the lender through a title company. At origination, landlord obligations of $5,044,401 were escrowed. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio assuming the “As-Is” appraised value of $91,200,000 for the Park Place at Florham Park Mortgaged Properties are 68.5% and 68.5%, respectively. With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A-1 as The Village at La Orilla, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio, and appraised value are based on the “As-Stabilized” appraised value of $22,050,000 as of January 1, 2018, which assumes certain tenants are in occupancy who have signed leases but have not yet taken their space. At origination, $622,968 was reserved with respect to these tenants. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date or ARD LTV Ratio assuming the “As-Is” appraised value of $21,450,000 as of August 2, 2017 are 71.7% and 58.8%, respectively. For additional information, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics – Appraised Value” and the footnotes to Annex A-1. |
(4) | “California—Northern” includes zip codes above 93600, and “California—Southern” includes zip codes at or below 93600. |
(5) | With respect to the whole loan secured by the mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Portfolio, loan proceeds were used to refinance existing debt of approximately $18.0 million encumbering the San Pedro Crossing Mortgaged Property and recapitalize the borrower sponsors recent acquisition of the remaining 11 AFIN Portfolio Mortgaged Properties. With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged properties identified on Annex A-1 as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio, loan proceeds were used to recapitalize the borrower sponsor after the purchase the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgaged Properties between March 31, 2017 and November 7, 2017. |
(6) | With respect to an ARD loan, refers to the term through the related anticipated repayment date. |
A-2-4 |
ANNEX A-3
SUMMARIES OF THE FIFTEEN LARGEST MORTGAGE LOANS
A-3-1
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
A-3-2
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
A-3-3
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller(1): | Société Générale; UBS AG | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Portfolio | ||||
Original Balance(2): | $60,000,000 | Location: | Various | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance(2): | $60,000,000 | General Property Type: | Retail | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 5.7% | Detailed Property Type: | Anchored | ||||
Loan Purpose(3): | Recapitalization | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. | Year Built/Renovated: | Various | ||||
Size: | 2,418,910 SF | ||||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.1910% | Cut-off Date Balance per SF(2): | $87 | ||||
Note Date: | 12/8/2017 | Maturity Date Balance per SF(2): | $87 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 2/1/2018 | Property Manager: | American Finance Properties, LLC | ||||
Maturity Date: | 1/1/2028 | ||||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | ||||||
Seasoning: | 1 month | ||||||
Prepayment Provisions(4): | LO (11); YM1 (107); O (2) | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/Springing | UW NOI: | $23,341,476 | ||||
Additional Debt Type(2): | Pari Passu | UW NOI Debt Yield(2): | 11.1% | ||||
Additional Debt Balance(2): | $150,000,000 | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(2): | 11.1% | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | UW NCF DSCR(2): | 2.34x | ||||
Reserves(5) | Most Recent NOI: | $26,006,908 (9/30/2017 TTM) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $27,004,951 (12/31/2016) | ||
RE Tax: | $832,502 | $355,956 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent NOI: | N/A | ||
Insurance: | $203,509 | $43,761 | N/A | Most Recent Occupancy: | 90.3% (11/28/2017) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 97.6% (12/31/2016) | ||
Deferred Maintenance: | $101,926 | $0 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | N/A | ||
TI/LC: | $798,196 | Springing | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $371,735,000 (Various) | ||
Environmental: | $9,827 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2): | 56.5% | ||
Free Rent: | $154,430 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(2): | 56.5% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(2): | $210,000,000 | 100.0% | Loan Payoff(3): | $17,985,000 | 8.6% | |
Reserves: | $2,100,391 | 1.0% | ||||
Closing Costs: | $4,431,142 | 2.1% | ||||
Return of Equity: | $185,483,468 | 88.3% | ||||
Total Sources: | $210,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $210,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan was co-originated by Société Générale and UBS AG, by and through its branch office at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York (“UBS AG”). |
(2) | The AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan (as defined below) is part of the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, which is comprised of sixteen pari passu senior promissory notes with an aggregate principal balance of $210,000,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio numbers presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan. |
(3) | Loan proceeds were used to refinance existing debt of approximately $18.0 million encumbering the San Pedro Crossing Property and recapitalize the borrower sponsor’s recent acquisition of the remaining 11 AFIN Portfolio Properties. |
(4) | Prior to the open prepayment date occurring in December 2027, the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan can be prepaid with yield maintenance. Partial release is permitted. See “Release of Property” below for further discussion of release requirements. |
(5) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
The Mortgage Loan. The largest mortgage loan (the “AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan”) evidenced by sixteen pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $210,000,000. The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan is secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering a 2,418,910 SF, 12-property portfolio of anchored retail properties located in North Carolina (three properties), Florida (two properties), Nevada (two properties), Kentucky (one property), Ohio (one property), Oklahoma (one property), Texas (one property) and South Carolina (one property) (collectively, the “AFIN Portfolio Properties”). The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan was co-originated by Société Générale and UBS AG. Promissory Notes A-1, A-5, A-10 and A-15, with an aggregate original principal balance of $60,000,000, collectively represent the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. The below table summarizes the remaining promissory notes, which were either previously securitized or are currently held by Société Générale and UBS AG and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time.
A-3-4
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
Note A-1 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-2 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | Société Générale | No |
Note A-3 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | UBS 2017-C7 | No |
Note A-4 | $12,000,000 | $12,000,000 | UBS 2017-C7 | No |
Note A-5 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-6 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | Société Générale | No |
Note A-7 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | Société Générale | No |
Note A-8 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | Société Générale | Yes |
Note A-9 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | UBS 2017-C7 | No |
Note A-10 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-11 | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | UBS AG | No |
Note A-12 | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | UBS AG | No |
Note A-13 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | UBS AG | No |
Note A-14 | $8,000,000 | $8,000,000 | UBS 2017-C7 | No |
Note A-15 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-16 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | UBS AG | No |
Total | $210,000,000 | $210,000,000 |
The proceeds of the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan were used to refinance existing debt of approximately $18.0 million encumbering the San Pedro Crossing Property, recapitalize the borrower sponsor’s investment in the remaining 11 AFIN Portfolio Properties, fund reserves, and pay closing costs.
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrowers are ARC CPOKCOK001, LLC; ARC SMWMBFL001, LLC; ARC CPFAYNC001, LLC; ARC SPSANTX001, LLC; ARC JCLOUKY001, LLC; ARC NPHUBOH001, LLC; ARC ASANDSC001, LLC; ARC NLLKLFL001, LLC; ARC RBASHNC001, LLC; ARC MCLVSNV001, LLC; ARC BBLVSNV001, LLC; and ARC RGCHRNC001, LLC (collectively, the “AFIN Portfolio Borrowers”), all single-purpose Delaware limited liability companies structured to be bankruptcy remote with two independent directors. The AFIN Portfolio Borrowers are 100.0% owned by the borrower sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor, American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Guarantor”).
American Finance Trust, Inc. (“AFIN”) is a public non-traded real estate investment trust that acquires and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial properties, which are net leased primarily to investment grade and national tenants, as well as a portfolio of stabilized core retail properties consisting primarily of power centers and lifestyle centers. As of the second quarter 2017, the borrower sponsor had a portfolio of 516 properties totaling approximately 19.2 million square feet. AFIN is externally managed by AR Global Investments, LLC, which has raised and invested over $30.0 billion in capital, served over 150,000 shareholders, and grown to one of the largest external managers of direct investment programs in the United States. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations”.
The Properties. The following table describes each property comprising the AFIN Portfolio Properties by descending Allocated Whole Loan Cut-off Date Balance.
Portfolio Summary | |||||||||
Property Name | Location | Year Built/ Renovated | Net Rentable Area (SF)(1) | UW NCF | % of UW NCF | Allocated Whole Loan Cut-off Date Balance(2) |
% of Whole Loan Cut-off Date Balance |
Appraised Value | Allocated Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2) |
Montecito Crossing | Las Vegas, NV | 2005/N/A | 179,721 | $3,101,756 | 14.9% | $33,040,000 | 15.7% | $52,450,000 | 63.0% |
Jefferson Commons | Louisville, KY | 2014/N/A | 205,918 | $2,424,762 | 11.6% | $24,440,000 | 11.6% | $38,800,000 | 63.0% |
Best on the Boulevard | Las Vegas, NV | 1996/2000 | 204,568 | $2,260,490 | 10.8% | $24,350,000 | 11.6% | $38,650,000 | 63.0% |
Northpark Center | Huber Heights, OH | 1994/2017 | 318,330 | $2,394,795 | 11.5% | $20,350,000 | 9.7% | $36,330,000 | 56.0% |
Anderson Station | Anderson, SC | 2001/N/A | 244,171 | $1,864,006 | 8.9% | $15,860,000 | 7.6% | $28,000,000 | 56.6% |
Cross Pointe Center | Fayetteville, NC | 1986/2003 | 226,089 | $1,686,633 | 8.1% | $15,730,000 | 7.5% | $27,675,000 | 56.8% |
San Pedro Crossing | San Antonio, TX | 1995-1999/N/A | 207,121 | $1,398,161 | 6.7% | $15,670,000 | 7.5% | $39,800,000 | 39.4% |
Riverbend Marketplace | Asheville, NC | 2004/N/A | 142,617 | $1,237,445 | 5.9% | $14,120,000 | 6.7% | $22,580,000 | 62.5% |
Shops at RiverGate South | Charlotte, NC | 2014/N/A | 140,697 | $1,081,973 | 5.2% | $14,090,000 | 6.7% | $25,000,000 | 56.4% |
Centennial Plaza | Oklahoma City, OK | 1992-1994/N/A | 233,797 | $1,209,463 | 5.8% | $13,360,000 | 6.4% | $25,600,000 | 52.2% |
Shoppes of West Melbourne | West Melbourne, FL | 1984/N/A | 144,484 | $1,529,708 | 7.3% | $12,480,000 | 5.9% | $21,900,000 | 57.0% |
North Lakeland Plaza | Lakeland, FL | 1986/N/A | 171,397 | $649,325 | 3.1% | $6,510,000 | 3.1% | $14,950,000 | 43.5% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 2,418,910 | $20,838,518 | 100.0% | $210,000,000 | 100.0% | $371,735,000 | 56.5% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Based on the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan allocated loan amounts. |
A-3-5
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
The AFIN Portfolio Properties benefit from nine distinct retailers (23.8% of underwritten base rent), representing investment grade tenants, including Kohl’s (rated BBB/Baa2/BBB- by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), Best Buy (rated BBB-/Baa1/BBB- by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), The Home Depot (rated A/A2/A by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), Bed Bath & Beyond (rated NR/Baa1/BBB by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), Ross Dress For Less (rated NR/A3/A- by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), The TJX Companies, Inc. (parent company of TJ Maxx and Marshalls, rated NR/A2/A+ by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), and Gap, Inc. (parent company of Old Navy, rated BB+/Baa2/BB+ by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), among others.
The AFIN Portfolio Properties have a weighted average tenant tenure of 14.4 years and a weighted average remaining lease term of 5.7 years. Additionally, 59.1% of tenants by NRA have been in occupancy for more than 11 years.
The following table presents certain information relating the tenants at the AFIN Portfolio Properties:
Tenant Summary(1) | ||||||||
Tenant Name | Portfolio Locations | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P)(2) | Tenant SF | Approximate % of SF | Annual UW Base Rent(3) | % of Total Annual UW Base Rent | Annual UW Base Rent PSF(3) | Lease Expiration |
Kohl’s | 2 | BBB/Baa2/BBB- | 169,139 | 7.0% | $1,353,380 | 5.0% | $8.00 | Various |
Best Buy | 3 | BBB-/Baa1/BBB- | 155,347 | 6.4% | $1,529,407 | 5.6% | $9.85 | Various |
Home Depot | 1 | A/A2/A | 102,962 | 4.3% | $854,585 | 3.1% | $8.30 | 1/31/2019 |
Elder Beerman | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 101,840 | 4.2% | $407,360 | 1.5% | $4.00 | 10/31/2019 |
Bealls | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 84,146 | 3.5% | $483,839 | 1.8% | $5.75 | 4/30/2020 |
Bed Bath & Beyond | 3 | NR/Baa2/BBB | 77,986 | 3.2% | $770,152 | 2.8% | $9.88 | Various |
Academy Sports + Outdoors | 1 | NR/B3/NR | 71,914 | 3.0% | $701,162 | 2.6% | $9.75 | 2/28/2030 |
PetSmart | 3 | NR/B1/NR | 66,351 | 2.7% | $899,498 | 3.3% | $13.56 | Various |
Ross Dress For Less | 2 | NR/A3/A- | 62,034 | 2.6% | $707,021 | 2.6% | $11.40 | Various |
Toys R Us(4) | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 60,687 | 2.5% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | 1/31/2021 |
Office Depot | 3 | NR/B1/B | 57,262 | 2.4% | $589,295 | 2.2% | $10.29 | Various |
Shoe Carnival | 4 | NR/NR/NR | 56,287 | 2.3% | $730,967 | 2.7% | $12.99 | Various |
Hobby Lobby | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 55,000 | 2.3% | $426,240 | 1.6% | $7.75 | 8/31/2019 |
Jo-Ann Fabric | 2 | NR/B1/B | 54,859 | 2.3% | $566,586 | 2.1% | $10.33 | Various |
Party City | 3 | NR/NR/NR | 52,427 | 2.2% | $616,513 | 2.3% | $11.76 | Various |
HomeGoods | 2 | NR/A2/A+ | 49,000 | 2.0% | $370,894 | 1.4% | $7.57 | Various |
Seafood City Supermarket | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 42,618 | 1.8% | $500,369 | 1.8% | $11.74 | 2/28/2022 |
Barnes & Noble | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 35,475 | 1.5% | $645,000 | 2.4% | $18.18 | 2/28/2021 |
Michaels | 2 | NR/NR/NR | 34,502 | 1.4% | $412,785 | 1.5% | $11.96 | Various |
ULTA Beauty | 3 | NR/NR/NR | 30,415 | 1.3% | $595,426 | 2.2% | $19.58 | Various |
Pier 1 Imports | 3 | NR/NR/B | 30,300 | 1.3% | $533,550 | 2.0% | $17.61 | Various |
TJ Maxx | 1 | NR/A2/A+ | 30,000 | 1.2% | $330,000 | 1.2% | $11.00 | 10/31/2026 |
Marshalls | 1 | NR/A2/A+ | 29,500 | 1.2% | $309,750 | 1.1% | $10.50 | 5/31/2026 |
Aldi | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 24,067 | 1.0% | $264,737 | 1.0% | $11.00 | 5/31/2028 |
The Container Store | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 22,817 | 0.9% | $607,389 | 2.2% | $26.62 | 1/31/2023 |
Liquor Barn | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 22,000 | 0.9% | $302,500 | 1.1% | $13.75 | 5/31/2025 |
Dollar Tree | 2 | NR/Ba1/BB+ | 21,563 | 0.9% | $192,530 | 0.7% | $8.93 | Various |
Old Navy | 1 | BB+/Baa2/BB+ | 20,000 | 0.8% | $260,000 | 1.0% | $13.00 | 1/31/2022 |
Five Below | 2 | NR/NR/NR | 15,815 | 0.7% | $243,364 | 0.9% | $15.39 | Various |
Guitar Center | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 15,200 | 0.6% | $149,720 | 0.6% | $9.85 | 10/31/2025 |
Kirkland’s | 2 | NR/NR/NR | 13,661 | 0.6% | $227,784 | 0.8% | $16.67 | Various |
Cavender’s Boot City | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 13,548 | 0.6% | $270,960 | 1.0% | $20.00 | 6/30/2022 |
Big 5 Sports | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 10,080 | 0.4% | $157,308 | 0.6% | $15.61 | 1/31/2021 |
Tuesday Morning | 1 | NR/NR/NR | 10,000 | 0.4% | $115,000 | 0.4% | $11.50 | 7/31/2021 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 59 | 1,698,802 | 70.2% | $17,125,071 | 62.9% | $10.45 | ||
Remaining Tenants | 145 | 484,411 | 20.0% | $10,096,411 | 37.1% | $20.84 | ||
Vacant Space | 0 | 235,697 | 9.7% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 204 | 2,418,910 | 100.0% | $27,221,482 | 100.0% | $12.83 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the Tenant Name field whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Annual UW Base Rent and Annual UW Base Rent PSF exclude vacant space and Toys R Us, which was underwritten as vacant. |
(4) | Toys R Us was underwritten as vacant; however, it is currently in occupancy and paying annual base rent of $910,305. |
A-3-6
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the AFIN Portfolio Properties:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling(3) | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 3 | 1,200 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $13.00 | $15,600 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
2017 | 1 | 6,450 | 0.3% | 0.3% | $17.05 | $110,000 | 0.4% | 0.5% |
2018 | 12 | 30,119 | 1.2% | 1.6% | $23.72 | $714,319 | 2.6% | 3.1% |
2019 | 37 | 385,633 | 15.9% | 17.5% | $10.43 | $4,021,681 | 14.8% | 17.9% |
2020 | 40 | 305,740 | 12.6% | 30.1% | $11.70 | $3,575,705 | 13.1% | 31.0% |
2021 | 24 | 304,056 | 12.6% | 42.7% | $16.52 | $4,020,214 | 14.8% | 45.8% |
2022 | 20 | 209,122 | 8.6% | 51.4% | $13.25 | $2,770,175 | 10.2% | 55.9% |
2023 | 15 | 147,255 | 6.1% | 57.4% | $15.59 | $2,295,977 | 8.4% | 64.4% |
2024 | 10 | 107,970 | 4.5% | 61.9% | $13.97 | $1,508,345 | 5.5% | 69.9% |
2025 | 22 | 375,206 | 15.5% | 77.4% | $13.66 | $5,126,583 | 18.8% | 88.7% |
2026 | 5 | 80,723 | 3.3% | 80.8% | $13.24 | $1,068,564 | 3.9% | 92.7% |
2027 | 3 | 13,563 | 0.6% | 81.3% | $28.03 | $380,233 | 1.4% | 94.1% |
2028 & Beyond | 12 | 216,176 | 8.9% | 90.3% | $7.47 | $1,614,086 | 5.9% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 235,697 | 9.7% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 204 | 2,418,910 | 100.0% | $12.83 | $27,221,482 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease and that are not considered in the lease rollover schedule. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. UW Base Rent PSF Rolling excludes vacant space. |
The Market.
The following table presents certain market information relating to the AFIN Portfolio Properties:
Market Overview(1) | |||||||
Property Name | Location | Market | Submarket | Estimated 2017 Population(2) | Estimated 2017 Average Household Income(2) |
Rental Rate PSF | |
Actual(3) | Submarket(4) | ||||||
Montecito Crossing | Las Vegas, NV | Las Vegas | Northwest | 233,930 | $86,121 | $21.10 | $19.80 |
Jefferson Commons | Louisville, KY | Louisville | South Central | 176,569 | $59,649 | $14.29 | $9.67 |
Best on the Boulevard | Las Vegas, NV | Las Vegas | Central East | 448,909 | $50,073 | $14.33 | $15.48 |
Northpark Center | Huber Heights, OH | Dayton | NE Central Dayton | 83,316 | $71,020 | $8.74 | $7.42 |
Anderson Station | Anderson, SC | Greenville/Spartanburg | Anderson | 56,860 | $64,691 | $11.61 | $8.73 |
Cross Pointe Center | Fayetteville, NC | Fayetteville | N/A(5) | 151,777 | $58,794 | $9.55 | $10.26(5) |
San Pedro Crossing | San Antonio, TX | San Antonio | North Central | 322,165 | $78,955 | $17.34 | $18.72 |
Riverbend Marketplace | Asheville, NC | Asheville | East Asheville | 87,541 | $66,334 | $12.13 | $13.57 |
Shops at RiverGate South | Charlotte, NC | Charlotte | Southwest | 99,238 | $95,171 | $17.44 | $20.75 |
Centennial Plaza | Oklahoma City, OK | Oklahoma City | Penn Square | 243,184 | $63,794 | $9.31 | $12.72 |
Shoppes of West Melbourne | West Melbourne, FL | Orlando | Brevard County | 132,623 | $61,786 | $12.34 | $11.85 |
North Lakeland Plaza | Lakeland, FL | Tampa/St. Pete | Polk County | 124,578 | $55,569 | $7.33 | $13.41 |
Avg. | $12.96 | $13.53 |
(1) | Information is based on third party market research reports. |
(2) | Information is based on a five-mile radius. |
(3) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(4) | Information is based on the appraisals. |
(5) | Submarket and Submarket Rental Rate PSF for the Cross Pointe Center property reflect the appraisal’s market rental rate PSF conclusion as there was no observable submarket. |
A-3-7
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the AFIN Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014(1) | 2015(1) | 2016 | 9/30/2017 TTM | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(2) | N/A | N/A | $29,685,333 | $28,957,564 | $27,221,482 | $11.25 |
Percentage Rent | N/A | N/A | $201,989 | $196,835 | $201,169 | $0.08 |
Total Recoveries | N/A | N/A | $6,993,844 | $7,437,869 | $6,265,070 | $2.59 |
Other Income(3) | N/A | N/A | $513,017 | $475,555 | $475,555 | $0.20 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | N/A |
N/A |
$0 |
$0 |
($910,305) |
($0.38) |
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | $37,394,183 | $37,067,823 | $33,252,972 | $13.75 |
Total Operating Expenses | N/A |
N/A |
$10,389,232 |
$11,060,915 |
$9,911,495 |
$4.10 |
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | $27,004,951 | $26,006,908 | $23,341,476 | $9.65 |
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | $406,890 | $0.17 |
TI/LC | N/A |
N/A |
$0 |
$0 |
$2,096,069 |
$0.87 |
Net Cash Flow | N/A | N/A | $27,004,951 | $26,006,908 | $20,838,518 | $8.61 |
Occupancy % | N/A | N/A | 97.6% | 91.4% | 89.2%(4) | |
NOI DSCR(5) | N/A | N/A | 3.03x | 2.91x | 2.62x | |
NCF DSCR(5) | N/A | N/A | 3.03x | 2.91x | 2.34x | |
NOI Debt Yield(5) | N/A | N/A | 12.9% | 12.4% | 11.1% | |
NCF Debt Yield(5) | N/A | N/A | 12.9% | 12.4% | 9.9% |
(1) | The AFIN Portfolio Properties were acquired between 2012 and 2015 and as such, historical financial information for 2014 and 2015 is unavailable. |
(2) | UW Gross Potential Rent includes underwritten rent steps of $229,592 taken through June 5, 2018. |
(3) | Other Income is primarily from utility expenses which are fully reimbursable at several of the AFIN Portfolio Properties. |
(4) | UW Occupancy % excludes all dark and bankrupt tenants. |
(5) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan. |
Escrows and Reserves. The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan documents provide for upfront escrows in the amount of $832,502 for real estate taxes, $203,509 for insurance premiums, $101,926 for deferred maintenance, $9,827 for environmental insurance, $154,430 for free rent and $798,196 for tenant improvement and leasing commissions. In addition, the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan documents provide for ongoing monthly escrows of $355,956 for real estate taxes and $43,761 for insurance premiums and other assessments.
The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan documents also provide for on-going replacement reserves and tenant improvement and leasing commissions in an amount initially equal to 1/12 of the product by multiplying $0.25 by the aggregate number of rentable square feet in the AFIN Portfolio Properties initially equal to $50,394 and 1/12 of the product by multiplying $1.00 by the aggregate number of rentable square feet of space in AFIN Portfolio Properties initially equal to $201,576, respectively. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers are not required to make deposits into the capital reserve subaccount or rollover reserve subaccount, for so long as the occurrence and continuance of a Cash Management Period (as defined below) is not then in effect.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan has a hard lockbox with springing cash management upon the occurrence and continuance of a Cash Management Period (as defined below).
A “Cash Management Period” will commence upon the lender giving notice to the clearing bank of the occurrence of any of the following: (i) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan maturity date, (ii) an event of default, (iii) the trailing 12-month debt service coverage ratio falling below 1.80x, or (iv) the commencement of a Lease Sweep Period (as defined below), and will end upon the lender giving notice to the clearing bank that the sweeping of funds into the deposit account may cease, which notice the lender will only be required to give if (1) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan and all other obligations under the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan documents have been repaid in full or (2) the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan maturity date has not occurred and (A) with respect to the matters described in clause (ii) above, such event of default has been cured and no other event of default has occurred and is continuing or (B) with respect to the matter described in clause (iii) above, the debt service coverage ratio is at least 1.80x for two consecutive calendar quarters, or (C) with respect to the matter described in clause (iv) above, such Lease Sweep Period has ended.
A “Lease Sweep Period” will occur upon any of the following: (i) the date that is twelve (12) months prior to the end of the term of any Major Lease (as defined below) (including any renewal terms), (ii) the date under a Major Lease by which the applicable Major Tenant (as defined below) is required to give notice of its exercise of a renewal option thereunder (and such renewal has not been so exercised), (iii) any Major Lease (or any material portion thereof) is surrendered, cancelled or terminated prior to its then current expiration date, (iv) any Major Tenant discontinues its business at its premises (i.e., “goes dark”) or gives notice that it intends to discontinue its business, (v) the occurrence and continuance (beyond any applicable notice and cure periods) of a material default under any Major Lease by the applicable Major Tenant thereunder, or (vi) the occurrence of a Major Tenant insolvency proceeding and will end upon the earlier to occur of (x) the date that funds in an amount equal to $15 per square foot of the space demised under the Major Lease (or Major Leases) that gave rise to the subject Lease Sweep Period have been accumulated in the special rollover reserve subaccount (or the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers have provided lender with a letter of credit equal to the initial rollover deposit or (y), with respect to the occurrence of a Lease Sweep Period caused by a matter described in clause (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) above, upon the earlier to occur of (A) the date on which a Major Tenant irrevocably exercises its renewal or extension option (or otherwise enters into an extension agreement with the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers that is acceptable to the lender in its reasonable discretion) with respect to all of the space demised under its Major Lease, and in the lender’s good faith judgment, sufficient funds have been accumulated in the special rollover reserve subaccount (during the continuance of the subject Lease Sweep Period) to pay for all anticipated
A-3-8
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 1 AFIN Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$60,000,000 56.5% 2.34x 11.1% |
major leasing expenses for such Major Lease and any other anticipated expenses in connection with such renewal or extension, or (B) the date on which all of the space demised under the Major Lease (or portion thereof) that gave rise to the Lease Sweep Period has been fully leased pursuant to a replacement lease or replacement leases, and all major lease leasing expenses (and any other expenses in connection with the re-tenanting of such space) have been paid in full, (2) with respect to a Lease Sweep Period caused by a matter described in clause (v) above, if the subject Major Tenant default has been cured, and no other Major Tenant default has occurred for a period of three consecutive months following such cure, or (3) with respect to a Lease Sweep Period caused by a matter described in clause (vi) above, if the applicable Major Tenant insolvency proceeding has terminated and the applicable Major Lease has been affirmed, assumed or assigned in a manner satisfactory to the lender in the exercise of lender’s reasonable discretion.
A “Major Lease” means (i) any lease (or leases) to a tenant or replacement tenant that, together with its affiliates, demises space comprising 50,000 or more rentable square feet of the improvements at any AFIN Portfolio Property or (ii) any lease (or leases) to a tenant that, together with its affiliates, provides for rent, in the aggregate, equal to 30% or more of the total in-place base rent at any AFIN Portfolio Property.
A “Major Tenant” means any tenant under either a Major Lease, or under one or more leases (leased by such tenant and/or its affiliates), which when taken together either (i) demises space comprising 50,000 or more rentable square feet of the improvements at any AFIN Portfolio Property or (ii) provides for rent, in the aggregate, equals 30% or more of the total in-place base rent at any AFIN Portfolio Property.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Release of Property. Any time after the expiration of the lockout period, the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers may obtain the release of any AFIN Portfolio Properties, provided, among other things, (i) the sale of such property is pursuant to an arm’s-length agreement to a third party not affiliated with any AFIN Portfolio Borrower or the Guarantor; (ii) the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers may obtain a release of the property if the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers make a prepayment of principal equal to the Release Amount (as defined below) for the property in question, together with any yield maintenance premium applicable thereto; (iii) no event of default under the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan documents has or will be continuing; (iv) the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers will remain special purpose bankruptcy remote entities; (v) the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers and the Guarantor execute and deliver such documents as lender may reasonably request to confirm the continued validity of the loan documents and liens; (vi) the debt service coverage ratio for all of the remaining AFIN Portfolio Properties will not be less than the greater of (a) the debt service coverage ratio immediately preceding such release and (b) 2.34x; and (vii) the loan-to-value ratio (such value to be determined, in lender’s sole discretion, by any commercially reasonable method permitted to a REMIC trust; and which will exclude the value of personal property or going concern value, if any) is greater than 125%, the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers will also make payment of principal in an amount such that the loan-to-value ratio (such value to be determined, in lender’s sole discretion, by any commercially reasonable method permitted to a REMIC trust; and which will exclude the value of personal property or going concern value, if any) is no more than 125%. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
A “Release Amount” is the greater of (i) 100% of the net sales proceeds with respect to such AFIN Portfolio Property and (ii) 110.0% - 120.0% of the allocated loan amount for such property as set forth in the loan agreement.
Substitution. Any time after December 31, 2018, the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers may obtain the release of any AFIN Portfolio Properties by providing one or more substitute properties (individually or collectively, the “Substitute Property”), provided that among other things, (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, (ii) the allocated loan amounts for all AFIN Portfolio Properties theretofore substituted do not exceed 25% of the AFIN Portfolio Whole Loan, (iii) unless otherwise agreed to by lender in its sole discretion, the total number of substitutions requested by AFIN Portfolio Borrowers (taking into account the then requested substitution) will not exceed three substitutions, (iv) no substitution will occur during the twelve month period preceding January 1, 2028, (v) the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers will deliver to lender a rating agency comfort letter as to the substitution, (vi) after giving effect to the substitution, the debt service coverage ratio for all of the AFIN Portfolio Properties will be no less than the debt service coverage ratio for all of the AFIN Portfolio Properties immediately preceding such substitution, (vii) the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers will deliver to lender an acceptable appraisal of each proposed substitute property and each proposed released AFIN Portfolio Property indicating an appraised value of the substitute property (as reflected in such acceptable appraisal) that is equal to or greater than the appraised value of the released property as of the substitution date (as reflected in such acceptable appraisal) (provided, however, that with respect to the AFIN Portfolio Properties known as Montecito Crossing, Best on the Boulevard and Jefferson Common, such properties may only be substituted if the value of the substitute property is equal to or greater than 110% of the appraised value of the released AFIN Portfolio Property), (viii) with respect to the Mortgaged Properties known as Montecito Crossing, Best on the Boulevard or Jefferson Common, such properties may only be substituted if the net operating income of the Substitute Property is equal to or greater than 110% of the net operating income of the released AFIN Portfolio Property and (ix) the AFIN Portfolio Borrowers will deliver to lender such other documents, instruments and agreements as lender may reasonably require relating to such substitution (including any documents as may be reasonably required by a special servicer in a securitization). See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
Terrorism Insurance. The AFIN Portfolio Borrowers are required to obtain insurance against acts of terrorism for loss resulting from perils and acts of terrorism in amounts and with terms and conditions applicable to commercial property, general liability, business income and umbrella liability insurance required pursuant to the AFIN Portfolio Mortgage Whole Loan documents.
A-3-9
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
A-3-10
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
A-3-11
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | CCRE; UBS AG | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance(1): | $56,500,000 | Location: | Rochester, NY 14624 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $56,440,256 | General Property Type: | Industrial | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 5.4% | Detailed Property Type: | Flex | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsors: | Leslie Westreich, Morty Yashar | Year Built/Renovated: | 1966-1983/2000-2004, 2017 | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 5.0210% | Size: | 3,353,230 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 12/11/2017 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF(1): | $33 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 2/6/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF(1): | $27 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 1/6/2028 |
Property Manager: |
Tech Park Manager LLC (borrower related) | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 360 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 0 months | ||||||
Seasoning: | 1 month | ||||||
Prepayment Provisions(2): | LO (25); DEF (90); O (5) | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/In Place | UW NOI(6): | $11,618,642 | ||||
Additional Debt Type(1)(3): | Pari Passu/Mezzanine | UW NOI Debt Yield(1): | 10.5% | ||||
Additional Debt Balance(1)(3): | $53,942,899/$19,500,000 | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(1): | 12.8% | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | UW NCF DSCR(1): | 1.42x | ||||
Reserves(4) | Most Recent NOI(6): | $10,759,437 (9/30/2017 TTM) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 2nd Most Recent NOI(6): | $9,528,464 (12/31/2016) | ||
RE Tax: | $700,000 | $100,000 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent NOI(6): | $5,920,327 (12/31/2015) | ||
Insurance: | $144,000 | $24,000 | N/A | Most Recent Occupancy(5)(6): | 68.1% (1/26/2018) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | $51,576 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy(6): | 66.9% (12/31/2016) | ||
Immediate Repairs: | $45,250 | $0 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy(6): | 61.7% (12/31/2015) | ||
Rollover: | $3,000,000 | Springing | $3,000,000 | Appraised Value (as of): | $210,000,000 (12/1/2017) | ||
TI/LC(5): | $9,203,324 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1): | 52.6% | ||
Free Rent Holdback(5): | $1,917,974 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1): | 43.3% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(1): | $110,500,000 | 85.0% | Loan Payoff: | $58,876,247 | 45.3% | |
Mezzanine Loan(3): | $19,500,000 | 15.0% | Partnership Payoff(7): | $31,657,140 | 24.4% | |
Reserves: | $15,010,548 | 11.5% | ||||
Closing Costs: | $2,390,858 | 1.8% | ||||
Return of Equity | $22,065,207 | 17.0% | ||||
Total Sources: | $130,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $130,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan (as defined below) is part of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan, which is comprised of eight pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $110,500,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the promissory notes comprising the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio based on the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan and the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan (as defined below) are $39, $33, 8.9%, 10.5%, 1.09x, 61.8%, and 52.6%, respectively. |
(2) | Partial release of vacant parcels is permitted. See “Release of Property” below for further discussion of release requirements. |
(3) | See “The Mortgage Loan” and “Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity” below for further discussion of mezzanine debt. |
(4) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
(5) | Kodak Alaris (248,184 SF) executed a 10-year lease in July 2017. The tenant is expected to take occupancy of a portion of its space in March 2018 and its remaining space in May 2018. At loan origination, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower (as defined below) deposited (i) approximately $9,203,324 into a TI/LC reserve, of which approximately $8,729,407 is earmarked for Kodak Alaris, and (ii) approximately $1,917,974 into a free rent reserve earmarked for Kodak Alaris. |
(6) | The borrower sponsors acquired the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property (as defined below) in 2007 and have since leased up over 1.7 million SF of space bringing occupancy from approximately 20% at acquisition to 68.1% as of January 6, 2018. |
(7) | Leslie Westreich, one of the non-recourse carveout guarantors, structured certain capital projects related to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property as loans to the partnership. The “Partnership Payoff” represents the payoff of such loans. |
The Mortgage Loan. The second largest mortgage loan (the “Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan”) with an aggregate original principal balance of $110,500,000. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan is secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering eleven office and industrial/flex buildings totaling 3,353,230 SF located in Rochester, New York (the “Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property”). Promissory Notes A-1-2, A-1-3, A-1-4, A-2-2, A-2-3 and A-2-4, with an aggregate original principal balance of $56,500,000, represent the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. The remaining pari passu notes, with an aggregate original principal balance of $54,000,000 (collectively, the “Tryad Industrial & Business Center Pari Passu Companion Loans”), are currently held in the UBS 2017-C7 Trust. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
A-3-12
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
Note A-1-1 | $27,000,000 | $26,971,450 | UBS 2017-C7 | No |
Note A-1-2 | $13,000,000 | $12,986,254 | UBS 2018-C8 | Yes |
Note A-1-3 | $10,000,000 | $9,989,426 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-1-4 | $5,250,000 | $5,244,449 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-2-1 | $27,000,000 | $26,971,450 | UBS 2017-C7 | No |
Note A-2-2 | $13,000,000 | $12,986,254 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-2-3 | $10,000,000 | $9,989,426 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-2-4 | $5,250,000 | $5,244,449 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Total | $110,500,000 | $110,383,156 |
The proceeds of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan, together with a mezzanine loan with an original principal balance of $19,500,000 (the “Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan”), were used to refinance the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property, pay off a partnership loan, fund reserves, pay closing costs and return equity to the borrower sponsors.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrower is Tech Park Owner LLC (the “Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower”), a Delaware limited liability company and single-purpose entity structured to be bankruptcy remote with two independent directors. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower provided a non-consolidation opinion at origination. The borrower sponsors and the nonrecourse carve-out guarantors, who are jointly and severally liable, are Leslie Westreich and Morty Yashar. Mr. Westreich and Mr. Yashar are principals of Tryad Group and each have more than 25 years of experience as real estate developers having owned and developed properties in more than 15 states.
Founded in 2004, the Tryad Group is a diversified real estate organization based in New York City. The Tryad Group’s portfolio includes approximately 6.0 million SF of commercial real estate throughout New York, New Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Tryad Group oversees all leasing and management functions at their properties.
The Property. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is a 3.4 million SF industrial/flex office park comprised of 14 buildings located in Rochester, New York. Eleven of the buildings are occupied by a variety of office and industrial tenants including high tech manufacturing tenants, call centers and warehouse tenants. The three other buildings include a service garage, salt storage building and storage shed. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property also features a full-service cafeteria.
The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is one of the largest technology parks in the United States with office, research, distribution, industrial, and manufacturing space in 11 connected buildings. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property has sophisticated telecommunications and onsite security configurations with a direct digital energy management system for HVAC and lighting control throughout the complex, and has its own utility plant for chilled water, and compressed air services. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is located near access to major highways and is within 6 miles of Greater Rochester International Airport.
The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is situated along NY-531 and has its own highway exit, offering ease of access for the 4,000+ employees that travel there on a daily basis. There are several bus stops within the campus providing access from downtown Rochester. Additionally, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property includes 8,429 parking spaces situated across six interconnected parking lots. Given the vast size of the parking areas, the borrower sponsors added a shuttle service throughout the park and parking lot for employees.
The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property was originally constructed from 1966 to 1983 for Kodak as one of their primary facilities in Rochester and was renovated from 2000 to 2004 as well as 2017. Since 2007, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property has undergone approximately $34.3 million of capital expenditures and tenant improvements. Additionally, the borrower sponsors have invested approximately $1.25 million in capital expenditures since 2015, which include upgrading and expanding the parking lot, installing new server technology to better accommodate tenants and the building systems and new property maintenance equipment.
Since acquiring the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property in 2007, the borrower sponsors have leased up over 1.7 million SF of space, bringing occupancy from approximately 20% at acquisition to 68.1% as of January 8, 2018. Notable new tenants include Bottling Group LLC (a subsidiary of PepsiCo) (107,236 SF), Jacobson Warehouse Co. (107,447 SF), University of Rochester (146,264 SF), Kodak Alaris (248,184 SF) and Bridgestone Tires (31,624 SF), among others.
A-3-13
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
Tryad Industrial & Business Center Historical Occupancy | ||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
20.0% | 34.6% | 36.5% | 37.2% | 41.2% | 46.1% | 50.9% | 55.9% | 61.7% | 66.9% | 69.0% |
Major Tenants.
Maximus (195,450 SF, 5.8% of NRA, 17.9% of underwritten base rent). Founded in 1975, Maximus is a for-profit operator of government health and human services programs in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Saudi Arabia. The company focuses on administering government-sponsored programs, such as Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, welfare-to-work and Medicare, among others. Maximus, Inc. is a publicly-traded company (NYSE: MMS) and is the lessee on the lease. As of December 6, 2017, MMS had a market capitalization of over $4.5 billion and as of Q3 2017, the company reported a net income of approximately $209.43 million.
Maximus utilizes its space at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property as a call center for New York State healthcare programs with nearly 2,000 employees. According to the borrower sponsors, upon taking its space in August 2016, Maximus received an $8.6 million tenant improvement package, which Maximus is currently paying back to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower under the terms of its lease. Maximus has a lease expiration of August 31, 2019 with an ongoing termination option if their contract with the government has been terminated, materially altered or permitted to expire, subject to a termination fee. Maximus has three, one-year renewal options.
Harris Corporation (260,108 SF, 7.8% of NRA, 13.9% of underwritten base rent). Harris Corporation (NYSE: HRS) is an American technology company, specializing in IT services, wireless equipment, tactical radios, electronics, night vision equipment and antennas of which it provides primarily to the United States Department of Defense. Harris Corporation has a market capitalization of nearly $17.0 billion as of December 6, 2017 and reported annual revenues of $5.9 billion as of June 30, 2017.
Harris Corporation acquired ITT Space Systems in 2015 for approximately $4.7 billion and subsequently took over its space at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property.
Harris Corporation occupies three spaces at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property totaling 107,283 SF (“Lease 1”), 111,322 SF and 41,503 SF with lease expirations of 8/31/2020, 12/31/2022 and 4/30/2027, respectively. Each lease has two, five-year renewal options. Harris Corporation has the right to terminate up to 50% of its space under Lease 1 after September 1, 2018 with 180 day’s prior notice. The termination option represents approximately 29% of Harris Corporation’s total space and 2.2% of NRA.
Kodak Alaris (248,184 SF, 7.4% of NRA, 12.7% of underwritten base rent). Founded in 2013, Kodak Alaris is a Rochester-based company that offers retail photo print, photographic paper and workflow products supply, still camera films and retail and souvenir photo products. In 2017, Kodak Alaris received a $2.0 million grant from New York State as an incentive to move to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property serves as the headquarters for three of its four business units.
Kodak Alaris executed a ten-year lease in July 2017. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower is expected to deliver and the tenant is expected to take occupancy of approximately 148,964 SF of its space in March 2018 and the remaining approximately 99,220 SF of the space by May 2018. The lease has a rent commencement date of September 1, 2018 and an expiration date of December 31, 2028. The lease includes a termination option on or after December 31, 2025 with one-year notice and the payment of a termination fee. Kodak Alaris has two, five-year renewal options. At loan origination, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower deposited (i) approximately $9.2 million into a TI/LC reserve, of which approximately $8.7 million is earmarked for Kodak Alaris, and (ii) approximately $1.9 million into a free rent reserve earmarked for Kodak Alaris.
Other tenants include the University of Rochester, Hammer Packaging Corporation, Bottling Group LLC (PepsiCo), Mercury Print, Eastman Kodak Company, Pharmasmart and Jacobson Warehouse Co. Overall, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is leased to 34 tenants.
Tryad Industrial & Business Center Tenancy Mix | |||
Tenant Industry | Occupied Net Rentable Area | % of Occupied Net Rentable Area | Notable Tenants |
Label/Package Printing | 268,109 | 11.7% | Hammer Packaging Corporation |
Medical | 263,220 | 11.5% | Ortho Clinical |
Defense | 260,108 | 11.4% | Harris Corporation |
Digital Photography/Imaging | 248,184 | 10.9% | Kodak Alaris |
Software & Services | 195,450 | 8.6% | Maximus |
Education | 189,729 | 8.3% | University of Rochester |
Photography | 177,123 | 7.8% | Eastman Kodak Company |
Printing - Educational Material | 169,688 | 7.4% | Mercury Print |
Warehousing/Logistics | 164,483 | 7.2% | Jacobson Warehouse Co. |
Other | 148,711 | 6.5% | Weldrite Closures Inc. |
Food & Beverage | 125,236 | 5.5% | Bottling Group LLC (PepsiCo) |
Automotive | 74,170 | 3.2% | Bridgestone |
A-3-14
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the largest tenants at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property based on UW Base Rent:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P)(2) | Tenant SF | Approximate
% of SF |
Annual UW Base Rent | % of Total Annual Base UW Rent | Annual UW Base Rent PSF(3) | Lease Expiration |
Maximus(4) | NR/NR/NR | 195,450 | 5.8% | $2,562,350 | 17.9% | $13.11(4) | 8/31/2019 |
Harris Corporation | BBB-/Baa3/BBB- | 260,108 | 7.8% | $1,990,778 | 13.9% | $7.65 | Various(5) |
Kodak Alaris(6) | NR/NR/NR | 248,184 | 7.4% | $1,814,153 | 12.7% | $7.31 | 12/31/2028 |
University of Rochester | AA-/Aa3/AA- | 146,264 | 4.4% | $1,333,392 | 9.3% | $9.12 | Various(7) |
Hammer Packaging Corporation | NR/NR/NR | 268,109 | 8.0% | $938,382 | 6.6% | $3.50 | 12/31/2018 |
Bottling Group LLC(8) | A/A1/A+ | 107,236 | 3.2% | $723,946 | 5.1% | $6.75 | 1/31/2020 |
Mercury Print | NR/NR/NR | 169,688 | 5.1% | $626,149 | 4.4% | $3.69 | 12/31/2024 |
Eastman Kodak Company | NR/Caa1/CCC+ | 177,123 | 5.3% | $575,650 | 4.0% | $3.25 | 11/30/2018 |
Pharmasmart(9) | NR/NR/NR | 53,000 | 1.6% | $384,250 | 2.7% | $7.25 | 9/30/2023 |
Jacobson Warehouse Co. | NR/NR/NR | 107,447 | 3.2% | $351,314 | 2.5% | $3.27 | 1/31/2021 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 1,732,609 | 51.7% | $11,300,364 | 78.9% | $6.52 | ||
Remaining Tenants | 551,602 | 16.4% | $3,015,132 | 21.1% | $5.47 | ||
Vacant Space | 1,069,019 | 31.9% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 3,353,230 | 100.0% | $14,315,495 | 100.0% | $6.27 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed under the heading “Tenant Name” whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. Annual UW Base Rent PSF excludes vacant space. |
(4) | Maximus’ current rent is $21.76 PSF, which includes amortizing tenant improvements. Annual UW Base Rent PSF of $13.11 is based on the renewal option after the tenant improvement allowance has been repaid and is in line with the appraiser’s market rent conclusion of $13.00 PSF. Maximus has the right to terminate its lease at any time if their contract with the government has been terminated, materially altered or permitted to expire, subject to a termination fee. |
(5) | Harris Corporation has three leases at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property as follows: 107,283 SF, 111,322 SF and 41,503 SF with lease expirations of 8/31/2020, 12/31/2022 and 4/30/2027, respectively. With respect to the 107,283 SF lease, Harris Corporation has the right to terminate up to 50% of its space under Lease 1 after September 1, 2018 with 180 day’s prior notice. The termination option represents approximately 29% of Harris Corporation’s total space and 2.2% of NRA. |
(6) | Kodak Alaris executed a ten-year lease in July 2017. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower is expected to deliver and the tenant is expected to take occupancy of approximately 148,964 SF in March 2018 with the remainder of the space being delivered by May 2018. The lease has a rent commencement date of September 1, 2018 and expiration date of December 31, 2028. The lease includes a termination option on or after December 31, 2025 with one-year notice and the payment of a termination fee. Kodak Alaris has two five-year renewal options. At loan origination, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower deposited (i) approximately $9.2 million into a TI/LC reserve, of which approximately $8.7 million is earmarked for Kodak Alaris, and (ii) approximately $1.9 million into a free rent reserve earmarked for Kodak Alaris. |
(7) | University of Rochester occupies five spaces at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property as follows: 81,562 SF, 28,482 SF, 20,350 SF, 10,870 SF and 5,000 SF with lease expirations of 11/30/2027, 11/30/2026, 11/30/2027, 12/31/2018 and 5/31/2018, respectively. |
(8) | Bottling Group LLC is a subsidiary of PepsiCo, Inc. |
(9) | Pharmasmart has a one-time right to terminate its lease in December 2022 with 180 days’ prior written notice and the payment of a termination fee. |
A-3-15
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx.
% of Total SF Rolling |
Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling(3) | Total
UW Base Rent Rolling |
Approx.
% of Total Rent Rolling |
Approx.
Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 1 | 4,480 | 0.1% | 0.1% | $5.61 | $25,111 | 0.2% | 0.2% |
2018 | 10 | 642,160 | 19.2% | 19.3% | $3.88 | $2,491,339 | 17.4% | 17.6% |
2019 | 6 | 250,740 | 7.5% | 26.8% | $11.05 | $2,769,764 | 19.3% | 36.9% |
2020 | 8 | 253,513 | 7.6% | 34.3% | $9.64 | $2,444,412 | 17.1% | 54.0% |
2021 | 3 | 147,447 | 4.4% | 38.7% | $3.56 | $524,914 | 3.7% | 57.7% |
2022 | 6 | 153,842 | 4.6% | 43.3% | $4.89 | $751,882 | 5.3% | 62.9% |
2023 | 3 | 84,475 | 2.5% | 45.8% | $8.38 | $708,000 | 4.9% | 67.9% |
2024 | 1 | 169,688 | 5.1% | 50.9% | $3.69 | $626,149 | 4.4% | 72.2% |
2025 | 2 | 112,600 | 3.4% | 54.2% | $4.88 | $549,475 | 3.8% | 76.1% |
2026 | 2 | 42,043 | 1.3% | 55.5% | $8.30 | $349,029 | 2.4% | 78.5% |
2027 | 4 | 175,039 | 5.2% | 60.7% | $7.21 | $1,261,268 | 8.8% | 87.3% |
2028 | 3 | 248,184 | 7.4% | 68.1% | $7.31 | $1,814,153 | 12.7% | 100.0% |
2029 & Beyond | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 68.1% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 1,069,019 | 31.9% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 49 | 3,353,230 | 100.00% | $6.27 | $14,315,495 | 100.00% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease and that are not considered in the lease rollover schedule. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. UW Base Rent PSF Rolling excludes vacant space. |
The Market. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is located approximately 6.0 miles west of downtown Rochester in an industrial area in the Town of Gates. The greater Rochester area is New York State’s third largest metropolitan area with a 2016 population of approximately 1.1 million individuals. Rochester is known as a technology hub and the area has been the birthplace to such corporations as Kodak, Western Union, Bausch & Lomb, Gleason and Xerox, companies that conduct extensive research and manufacturing in the fields of industrial and consumer products. Additionally, Rochester is known as the world capital of imaging.
The immediate area offers adequate access to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property with three freeway exits providing access to the interstate system via State Route 531 and Interstate 490. One exit is dedicated to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property. In addition, there are several bus stops within the campus providing access from downtown Rochester.
According to a third party market research report, the 2016 population within a three- and five-mile radius of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is 39,868 and 140,951, respectively, and the median household income within a three- and five-mile radius of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is $51,601 and $47,290, respectively.
As of Q2 2017, the Rochester market had a total industrial inventory of 93.6 million SF with a vacancy rate of 6.2%, which is in line with the 2016 average of 6.1%. As of Q3 2017, the Rochester market had a total office inventory of approximately 46.4 million SF with a vacancy rate of 8.8%, which is in line with the average vacancy rate for the past 9 years of 9.0%.
The appraisal identified fifteen comparable leases and concluded a weighted average market rent of $6.33 PSF, which is in line with UW Base Rent PSF of $6.27 PSF.
Tryad Industrial & Business Center Market Rent | |||
Net Rentable Area | UW Base Rent PSF(1) | Market Rent PSF | |
Flex/Office | 1,128,937 | $9.33 | $10.00 |
Flex/Office-Small Unit | 27,799 | $6.83 | $12.00 |
Maximus Office Unit | 195,450 | $13.11 | $13.00 |
Industrial-Small Unit | 37,283 | $4.19 | $5.00 |
Industrial | 1,963,761 | $3.90 | $3.50 |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 3,353,230 | $6.27(2) | $6.33 |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Wtd. Avg. UW Base Rent PSF excludes vacant space. |
A-3-16
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property:
Cash Flow Analysis(1) | ||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 9/30/2017 TTM | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(2)(3)(4) | $7,403,937 | $9,027,325 | $11,875,899 | $14,009,391 | $21,101,242 | $6.29 |
Total Recoveries | $5,677,471 | $5,959,222 | $5,975,325 | $5,788,021 | $6,136,757 | $1.83 |
Other Income(5) | $270,130 | $220,565 | $869,517 | $267,735 | $267,735 | $0.08 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
($6,785,747) |
($2.02) |
Effective Gross Income | $13,351,538 | $15,207,112 | $18,720,741 | $20,065,147 | $20,719,987 | $6.18 |
Real Estate Taxes(6) | $1,113,064 | $1,145,405 | $1,160,289 | $1,197,181 | $1,197,181 | $0.36 |
Insurance | $274,313 | $290,098 | $299,443 | $303,861 | $299,032 | $0.09 |
Management Fee | $630,057 | $584,343 | $673,030 | $658,938 | $621,600 | $0.19 |
Other Operating Expenses | $8,009,960 | $7,266,939 | $7,059,515 | $7,145,730 | $6,983,532 | $2.08 |
Total Operating Expenses | $10,027,394 | $9,286,785 | $9,192,277 | $9,305,710 | $9,101,345 | $2.71 |
Net Operating Income | $3,324,144 | $5,920,327 | $9,528,464 | $10,759,437 | $11,618,642 | $3.46 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $611,684 | $0.18 |
TI/LC | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$871,840 |
$0.26 |
Net Cash Flow | $3,324,144 | $5,920,327 | $9,528,464 | $10,759,437 | $10,135,118 | $3.02 |
Occupancy % | 55.9% | 61.7% | 66.9% | 71.2% | 68.1% | |
NOI DSCR(7) | 0.47x | 0.83x | 1.34x | 1.51x | 1.63x | |
NCF DSCR(7) | 0.47x | 0.83x | 1.34x | 1.51x | 1.42x | |
NOI Debt Yield(7) | 3.0% | 5.4% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 10.5% | |
NCF Debt Yield(7) | 3.0% | 5.4% | 8.6% | 9.7% | 9.2% |
(1) | The borrower sponsors acquired the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property in 2007 and have since leased up over 1.7 million SF of space bringing occupancy from approximately 20% at acquisition to 68.1% as of January 11, 2018. |
(2) | Includes contractual rent steps through January 31, 2019 ($59,639). |
(3) | Maximus’ current rent is $21.76 PSF, which includes amortizing tenant improvements. Underwritten rent is $13.11 PSF, which is based on the renewal option after the tenant improvement allowance has been repaid and is in line with the appraiser’s market rent conclusion of $13.00 PSF. |
(4) | UW Gross Potential Rent includes rent for Kodak Alaris ($1,814,153). Kodak Alaris executed a ten-year lease in July 2017 and is currently building out its space. A portion of the space is expected to be delivered in March 2018 with the remainder of the space expected to be delivered by May 2018. The lease has a rent commencement date of September 1, 2018 and expiration date of December 31, 2028. At loan origination, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower deposited (i) approximately $9.2 million into a TI/LC reserve of which approximately $8.7 million is earmarked for Kodak Alaris and (ii) approximately $1.9 million into a free rent reserve earmarked for Kodak Alaris. |
(5) | The increase in 2016 Other Income is a primarily a result of a one-time termination fee for a tenant that vacated. |
(6) | The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property is subject to a 20-year PILOT agreement with the Monroe County Industrial Development Authority, which abates the real estate taxes through 2028. The real estate taxes reflect the PILOT payment paid. The 9/30/2017 TTM and the underwritten real estate taxes ($1,197,181) reflect the current PILOT payment based on the trailing 12-months and is subject to annual increases of 3%. See “PILOT Agreement and IDA Ground Lease” below for further discussion. |
(7) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan. |
Escrows and Reserves. At origination, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower deposited in escrow (i) $700,000 upfront for annual real estate taxes and is required to escrow monthly 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, (ii) $144,000 upfront for annual insurance premiums and is required to escrow monthly 1/12 of the annual estimated insurance premiums, (iii) $9,203,324 upfront for owed tenant improvements of which approximately $8.7 million is earmarked for Kodak Alaris, (iv) $3,000,000 upfront for future rollover and is required to escrow $97,803 monthly into a rollover reserve in the event that the balance of the rollover reserve falls below $1,500,000 until such time as the amount on deposit equals $3,000,000, (v) $1,917,974 upfront in escrow for free rent associated with Kodak Alaris, (vi) $51,576 monthly for capital expenditures and (vii) $45,250 upfront for immediate repairs.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and in place cash management. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower is required to send tenant direction letters to all tenants instructing them to deposit all rents and payments directly into the lockbox account controlled by the lender. All funds in the lockbox account are swept daily to a cash management account under the control of the lender and amounts in this account are used to pay monthly debt service payments on the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan & Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan and any reserves due under the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan documents with excess amounts remaining in this account returned to the borrower in accordance with the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan documents, unless a Cash Trap Period (as defined below) is continuing.
All excess cash will be swept into a lender-controlled account during the continuation of a Cash Trap Period.
A “Cash Trap Period” will commence upon written notice from lender to borrower of the occurrence of (i) an event of default under the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mortgage Loan or the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan, (ii) the filing of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding by or against the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower, guarantor or property manager, (iii) a Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period (as defined below) or (iv) the failure by the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower, after the end of two consecutive calendar quarters, to maintain a debt service coverage ratio (in the aggregate taking into account both the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan and the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan) of at least 1.05x. A Cash Sweep Period will continue until, in regard to clause (i) above, the cure of such event of default and acceptance of such cure by the lender, in regard to clause (ii) above, with respect to a bankruptcy action by or against the property manager only, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower replacing the manager with a qualified manager under an acceptable replacement management agreement, with regard to
A-3-17
Rochester Technology Park Rochester, NY 14624 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 2 Tryad Industrial & Business Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$56,440,256 52.6% 1.42x 10.5% |
clause (iii) above, such Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period having terminated and no other Cash Trap Period then existing, or with regard to clause (iv) above, the debt service coverage ratio being at least 1.05x (in the aggregate taking into account both the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan and the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan) for two consecutive calendar quarters and no other Cash Trap Period then being in effect or event that would trigger another Cash Trap Period has occurred.
A “Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period” will commence upon the earlier of (i) six months prior to the then current expiration of any Primary Tenant lease, (ii) the date upon which any Primary Tenant (as defined below) becomes a debtor in any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, (iii) the date upon which any Primary Tenant vacates, surrenders, “goes dark” or otherwise gives notice of its intent to discontinue business at the space under their respective lease(s) or (iv) a monetary or material non-monetary default by the Primary Tenant under its lease. A Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period will end upon (a) the occurrence of a Primary Tenant Trigger Cure Event (as defined below), or (b) the NCF debt yield being equal to or greater than 8.50% (without including any income from any Primary Tenant who triggered such Primary Tenant Trigger Event) for a period of two consecutive calendar quarters subsequent to the commencement of the existing Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period.
A “Primary Tenant Trigger Cure Event” will occur upon the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower satisfying all of the following conditions: (i) with respect to any Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower has entered into one or more leases with one or more replacement tenants reasonably satisfactory to the lender demising not less than 85.0% of the applicable Primary Tenant space for a term of not less than three years, each at a net effective rental rate of not less than either (x) the net effective rental rate under the Primary Tenant lease at loan origination, (y) the effective fair market rent then prevailing for similar properties and leases in the market area (and taking into account the type and creditworthiness of the tenant, the length of the term including any renewals, and the location and size of the premises covered thereby) or (z) the net effective rental rate reasonably acceptable to the lender; (ii) with respect to a Primary Tenant Cash Trap Period that is triggered solely due to a bankruptcy trigger, the date on which Primary Tenant is no longer a debtor in any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding).
A “Primary Tenant” means, individually and collectively, (i) Maximus, (ii) Harris Corporation, (iii) Eastman Kodak Company, (iv) University of Rochester, (v) Hammer Packaging Corporation, (vi) Kodak Alaris or (vii) any tenant or its affiliates that collectively occupy at least 200,000 SF at the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. In connection with the loan origination, Sound Mark Partners, LLC funded a mezzanine loan with an original principal balance of $19,500,000 that accrues interest at a rate of 10.7500% per annum. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Mezzanine Loan is co-terminous with the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan and is interest-only for its full term. The mezzanine lender entered into an intercreditor agreement with the lenders.
Release of Property. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower may obtain the free release of one or more vacant release parcels, subject to the terms of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan documents, which parcels are defined in the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan documents. The identified vacant parcels were not included in the underwriting or appraised value of the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan.
PILOT Agreement and IDA Ground Lease. In August 2007, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower entered into a 20-year payment in lieu of taxes (“PILOT”) agreement with the County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency (“IDA”) pursuant to which the borrower is required to pay, in lieu of taxes, an amount equal to $1,082,118 (the “Base Amount”) in special district charges and assessments during years 1-5 with a 3% per annum increase in the Base Amount in years 6-20; provided that the agreement permits the reduction of the Base Amount in the event there are special charges and assessments in excess of $60,000; and provided, further, that in the event the borrower constructs additional improvements that lead to an increase in the assessed value, the Base Amount may increase. In connection with the PILOT agreement, the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower leased the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property to IDA pursuant to a ground lease that requires rent of $1.00 per year and is co-terminous with the PILOT agreement. The IDA subleased the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Property back to the borrower to operate the related property. The lender has the right to terminate the ground lease and the related sub-lease in connection with a foreclosure proceeding against the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations”.
Terrorism Insurance. The Tryad Industrial & Business Center Borrower is required to obtain insurance against acts of terrorism for loss resulting from perils and acts of terrorism in amounts and with terms and conditions applicable to commercial property, general liability, business income and umbrella liability insurance required pursuant to the Tryad Industrial & Business Center Whole Loan documents.
A-3-18
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-19
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
A-3-20
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
A-3-21
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
A-3-22
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | CCRE | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance(1): | $50,000,000 | Location: | Lowell, MA 01851 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $50,000,000 | General Property Type: | Office | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 4.8% | Detailed Property Type: | Suburban | ||||
Loan Purpose(2): | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsors: | William H. Kremer; Samuel T. Byrne | Year Built/Renovated: | 1979/2017 | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.73400% | Size: | 1,320,254 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 1/16/2018 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF(1): | $114 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 3/4/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF(1): | $114 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2028 | Property Manager: | ALP CrossPoint Manager LLC | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | UW NOI: | $17,661,721 | ||||
Prepayment Provisions(3)(4): | LO (24); DEF (90); O (6) | UW NOI Debt Yield(1): | 11.8% | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(1): | 11.8% | ||||
Additional Debt Type(1)): | Pari Passu | UW NCF DSCR(1): | 2.24x | ||||
Additional Debt Balance(1)(4)(5): | $100,000,000 | Most Recent NOI(6): | $11,312,928 (11/30/2017 TTM) | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 2nd Most Recent NOI(6): | $6,360,488 (12/31/2016) | ||||
Reserves(5) | 3rd Most Recent NOI(7): | N/A | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent Occupancy: | 95.4% (1/11/2018) | ||
RE Tax: | $240,000 | $240,000 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 63.7% (12/31/2016) | ||
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 67.0% (12/31/2015) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | $18,703 | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $250,000,000 (1/8/2018) | ||
TI/LC: | $0 | $110,021 | $3,960,762 | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1): | 60.0% | ||
Kronos Free Rent Reserve: | $6,500,000 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1): | 60.0% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(1): | $150,000,000 | 63.7% | Purchase Price(2): | $227,200,000 | 96.5% | |
Borrower Equity | $85,555,563 | 36.3% | Reserves: | $6,740,000 | 2.9% | |
Closing Costs: | $1,615,563 | 0.7% | ||||
Total Sources: | $235,555,563 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $235,555,563 | 100.0% |
(1) | The original principal balance represents a portion of the CrossPoint Whole Loan (as defined below), which is comprised of 10 pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $150,000,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the CrossPoint Whole Loan. |
(2) | Anchor Line, an affiliate of the CrossPoint manager, was part of the prior ownership structure of the CrossPoint Property and has retained an approximate 3.5% ownership stake in conjunction with the acquisition. |
(3) | Partial release of a one-acre parcel is permitted. See “Release of Property” below for further discussion of release requirements. |
(4) | The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of March 4, 2018. Following the lockout period, the CrossPoint Borrower (as defined below) has the right to defease the CrossPoint Whole Loan in whole or in part (as described below under “Releases of Property”), on any date before September 4, 2027. The lockout period will expire on the earlier to occur of (i) two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last note to be securitized or (ii) March 4, 2021. For the purposes of this term sheet, the assumed lockout period of 24 months is based on the expected UBS 2018-C8 securitization closing date in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
(5) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
(6) | The increase in NOI from 2016 to 11/30/2017 TTM is primarily associated with an increase in occupancy from 63.7% to 95.4%. In May 2016, Kronos executed a new 12-year lease for 505,664 SF (38.3% of NRA). |
(7) | The borrower sponsors acquired the CrossPoint Property in January 2018. As a result, historical financials prior to 2016 are unavailable. |
A-3-23
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
The Mortgage Loan. The third largest mortgage loan (the “CrossPoint Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “CrossPoint Whole Loan”) with an aggregate original principal balance of $150,000,000. The CrossPoint Whole Loan is secured by a first priority mortgage encumbering the CrossPoint Borrower’s fee interest in four interconnected Class A office towers totaling 1,320,254 SF located in Lowell, MA (the “CrossPoint Property”). Promissory Notes A-2, A-3, and A-9, with an aggregate original principal balance of $50,000,000, collectively represent the CrossPoint Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. Promissory Notes A-1, A-4, A-7, A-8 and A-10 are currently held by CCRE or an affiliate, and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time. Promissory Notes A-5 and A-6 are currently held by Starwood Mortgage Capital LLC (“Starwood”) or an affiliate, and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
CrossPoint Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
Note A-1 | $30,000,000 | $30,000,000 | CCRE | Yes |
Note A-2 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-3 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-4 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | CCRE | No |
Note A-5 | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | Starwood | No |
Note A-6 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | Starwood | No |
Note A-7 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | CCRE | No |
Note A-8 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | CCRE | No |
Note A-9 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-10 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | CCRE | No |
Total | $150,000,000 | $150,000,000 |
The proceeds of the CrossPoint Whole Loan, along with approximately $85.6 million of borrower equity, were used to acquire the CrossPoint Property, fund reserves of approximately $6.74 million, and pay closing costs.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrower is CH LH CrossPoint Owner LLC (the “CrossPoint Borrower”), a single-purpose Delaware limited liability company structured to be bankruptcy remote with two independent directors. The borrower sponsors of the CrossPoint Whole Loan are Samuel T. Byrne and William Kremer. The initial nonrecourse carveout guarantors of the CrossPoint Loan are Samuel T. Byrne and Brian Chaisson (the “Initial Guarantors”) on a joint and several basis. The Initial Guarantors did not sign an indemnity to cover any breach of the environmental covenants; however, the borrower obtained environmental insurance in lieu of the typical indemnity and the CrossPoint Whole Loan documents provide for springing recourse to the Initial Guarantors with respect to environmental matters if at any time the environmental policy ceases to remain in full force and effect. In addition, the CrossPoint Whole Loan documents do not provide for recourse to the guarantors for certain loss recourse items. For additional information, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations” and “—Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations”.
The CrossPoint Whole Loan documents provide that one or more of the Initial Guarantors may be replaced from time to time by a replacement guarantor, provided, among other things, that the replacement guarantor, in the aggregate with any other replacement or remaining guarantors, has a net worth of not less than $50,000,000, and, if such replacement guarantor is not a natural person, liquid assets of at least $5,000,000. In connection with the origination of the CrossPoint Whole Loan, Lighthouse Real Estate Holdings LLC (“Lighthouse”) contributed $82.1 million to the CrossPoint Borrower in exchange for a 91.73% equity interest. In certain circumstances, Lighthouse has the right to buy out the Initial Guarantors’ interest in the CrossPoint Borrower. In connection with the origination of the CrossPoint Whole Loan, the lender determined that Lighthouse satisfies the conditions set forth in the CrossPoint Whole Loan documents to become a replacement guarantor, provided there is no material and adverse change with respect to Lighthouse as of the date of the replacement of one or more of the Initial Guarantors.
Samuel T. Byrne and William Kremer are managing partners and co-founders of Cross Harbor Capital Partners, LLC (“Cross Harbor”), a Boston-based real estate private equity firm founded in 1993. Cross Harbor develops and manages private equity investment products in three principal business areas: real assets, distressed securities and mezzanine capital and has invested in more than $13 billion of commercial real estate on behalf of a diversified group of endowments, foundations, public and corporate pension plans, financial institutions, family offices, and sovereign entities.
Brian Chaisson is a founder and managing partner of Anchor Line Partners, LLC (“Anchor Line”). Anchor Line, an affiliate of the CrossPoint Property manager and part of the property ownership structure prior to the sale of the CrossPoint Property to the CrossPoint Borrower, has retained an approximate 3.5% ownership stake in the CrossPoint Property conjunction with the acquisition. Anchor Line is a Boston- based company that focuses on core plus, value add, and opportunistic investment opportunities in the commercial real estate sector. Brian Chaisson has served in senior positions across multiple real estate finance platforms, including as a principal of Cross Harbor and as the Regional Director in Boston for Tishman Speyer.
The Property. The CrossPoint Property consists of three Class A multi-tenanted office towers (Tower 1, Tower 2 and Tower 3), and one vacant 13,700 SF single-story building on the northeast corner, across 42.9 acres in Lowell, Massachusetts. Towers 1 & 3 each consist of 13 floors while Tower 2 has 14 floors, resulting in a total of 40 floors and 1,320,254 SF. The CrossPoint Property was constructed between 1979 and 1985 and recently underwent a large-scale renovation totaling $76.3 million in capital expenditures and leasing costs that was completed in 2017. The renovation included an exterior wall reconstruction to increase square footage and improve natural light penetration, a lobby renovation, HVAC upgrades and relocation, electrical system upgrades, and the addition of the fitness center and cafeteria.
The CrossPoint Property is a Class A property that features a range of amenities including (i) Fuel, a 16,186 SF dining facility, (ii) Flex, a 7,027 SF fitness facility that includes a weight room, gaming center, yoga classes, and golf-simulator, (iii) Lawn, a 16,811 SF conference facility that includes two auditoriums (500 and 200 seats) and three conference rooms (50, 30, and 20 seat rooms) and (iv) a basketball court. In addition, the CrossPoint Property has tenants that provide additional amenities including (i) Little Sprouts, a 12,768 SF day-care facility that has a 215 child capacity and (ii) Tavern in the Square, an 8,385 SF restaurant located on the main floor of Tower 3, with 2017 gross sales of $6,152,608 (2.7% occupancy cost).
A-3-24
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
The CrossPoint Property is located between entrance points to U.S Route 3 (the Northwest Expressway), State Route 2B (the Lowell Connector), and Interstate-495, providing access to transportation throughout New England. The CrossPoint Property provides for approximately 4,000 parking spaces, 306 of which are contained in an attached two-level garage.
The CrossPoint Property benefits from an easement agreement with the owner of an adjacent parcel that provides 2,745 parking spaces on approximately 27 acres. Any amendments to the parking easement agreement are subject to (i) the lender’s prior written approval and (ii) compliance with zoning laws and ordinances.
The CrossPoint Property is currently 95.4% leased to 21 tenants, with major national tenants such as Kronos (38.3%% of NRA; rated BB/B2/NR by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), Verizon (23.9% of NRA; rated A-/Baa1/BBB+ by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), Arris Technology (10.9% of NRA; rated NR/Ba3/BB by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P), and Vantiv eCommerce (4.8% of NRA).
Major Tenants.
Kronos Incorporated (505,664 SF, 38.3% of NRA, 37.8% of underwritten base rent, rated BB/B2/NR by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P). Kronos Incorporated (“Kronos”), which leases all of Tower 1 and portions of Towers 2 and 3, is a provider of workforce management and human capital management cloud solutions for businesses, healthcare providers, educational institutions, and government agencies of all sizes. Tens of thousands of organizations, including more than half of the Fortune 1000 and more than 40 million people in over 100 countries use Kronos every day. Founded in Lowell in 1977, Kronos recently relocated its headquarters back to Lowell by executing a 12-year lease in May 2016 at the CrossPoint Property. In conjunction with its headquarters relocation, Kronos invested approximately $12.0 million and according to the borrower sponsors, Kronos plans to grow its corporate headquarters’ employee count from 1,600 to 2,000. Additionally, the tenant received a $33.0 million tenant improvement package from the prior owner that included structural and base system upgrades. The tenant improvement allowance granted to tenant has been disbursed in full by the landlord under the Kronos lease.
In the event the CrossPoint Borrower intends to sell the CrossPoint Property, Kronos has a right of first offer to purchase the CrossPoint Property. The right to purchase does not apply to a sale pursuant to an exercise of a power of sale, foreclosure by mortgage, delivery of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or any ensuing sale of the CrossPoint Property after the CrossPoint Property is relinquished by the CrossPoint Borrower as a result of the aforementioned events. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Purchase Options and Rights of First Refusal”.
Additionally, Kronos has a right of first offer to lease any space that becomes available at the CrossPoint Property subject to conditions set forth in the Kronos lease and the prior rights of certain tenants, including Verizon with respect to a portion of the CrossPoint Property. In December 2016, Kronos exercised this right and leased an additional 37,554 SF suite on the 12th floor of Tower 3.
In conjunction with its new lease and the relocation of its corporate headquarters to the CrossPoint Property, the city of Lowell granted Kronos a tax exemption through a tax incentive financing (“TIF”) agreement. The 12-year agreement provides the tenant with a tax exemption and in return the tenant is required to, among other things, (i) create 400 new jobs at the CrossPoint Property, (ii) work with UMass Lowell & other local colleges to hire Lowell residents and (iii) invest $18.5 million of capital improvements into the building. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations”.
Verizon New England (314,981 SF, 23.9% of NRA, 21.5% of underwritten base rent, rated A-/Baa1/BBB+ by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P). Verizon New England Inc., a subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”) (NYSE: VZ), provides voice, data, and video services to homes and businesses in Massachusetts. The Verizon lease is not guaranteed by its parent company. Verizon offers fiber optics Internet, TV, and digital voice services; Internet; and wireless 4G LTE services, utilizes six floors at the CrossPoint Property for engineering, sales and management while the remaining four floors are call centers.
Verizon has been a tenant at the CrossPoint Property since 1994, and has expanded its space by over 220,000 SF since then. According to the tenant, Verizon has invested $20.0-$25.0 million into its space. As of January 2018, Verizon had a market cap of approximately $217 billion. Verizon has a right of first offer on certain vacant space within the CrossPoint Property. Additionally, Verizon has the right to terminate up to 222,601 SF of its space effective on 12/31/2020 and/or 92,380 SF of its space effective 5/31/2021, in each case, by giving notice on or before 12/31/2019, and subject to payment of a termination fee.
Arris Technology, Inc. (143,594 SF, 10.9% of NRA, 10.4% of underwritten base rent, rated NR/Ba3/BB by Fitch/Moody’s/S&P). Arris Technology, Inc. (“Arris”) (NASDAQ: ARRS) is a world leader in entertainment and communications technology. Arris provides a diverse array of different communications and multimedia solutions including content security, UltraHD TV, cloud-based DVR services, and high-bandwidth Wi-Fi, along with many others. At the CrossPoint Property, Arris utilizes its space as a research and testing center for TV, Internet, and cloud-based products. As of January 26 2018, Arris had a market cap of approximately $4.7 billion.
The remaining tenants include a mix of national and local office tenants such as the U.S Internal Revenue Service, Vantiv eCommerce, Captivate LLC, Persivia, and Jabra, among others. These remaining tenants comprise 22.4% of the NRA and 30.3% of the UW base rent. Of the 1,320,254 SF at the CrossPoint Property, approximately 40,024 SF represents amenities that include an auditorium, a conference center, a cafeteria, and a fitness center.
A-3-25
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the CrossPoint Property:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/ S&P)(2) | Tenant SF | Approximate
% of SF |
Annual UW Base Rent | % of Total Annual UW Base Rent | Annual UW Base Rent PSF(3) |
Lease Expiration |
Kronos Incorporated(4) | BB/B2/NR | 505,664 | 38.3% | $7,837,792 | 37.8% | $15.50 | 2/6/2029 |
Verizon New England(5) | A-/Baa1/BBB+ | 314,981 | 23.9% | $4,453,589 | 21.5% | $14.14 | 12/31/2023(6) |
Arris Technology, Inc. | NR/Ba3/BB | 143,594 | 10.9% | $2,145,286 | 10.4% | $14.94 | 4/30/2027 |
Vantiv eCommerce, LLC | NR/NR/NR | 63,924 | 4.8% | $1,534,176 | 7.4% | $24.00 | 12/31/2021 |
United States of America (GSA) - IRS | AAA/Aaa/AA+ | 36,752 | 2.8% | $1,266,958 | 6.1% | $34.47 | 8/14/2026(7) |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 1,064,915 | 80.7% | $17,237,801 | 83.2% | $16.19 | ||
Remaining Tenants(8) | 194,688 | 14.7% | $3,487,858 | 16.8% | $17.92 | ||
Vacant Space | 60,651 | 4.6% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 1,320,254 | 100.0% | $20,725,659 | 100.0% | $16.45 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the “Tenant Name” field whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. Annual UW Base Rent PSF excludes vacant space. |
(4) | Kronos Incorporated is currently building out its space and has a free rent period through February 2019. |
(5) | Annual UW Base Rent for Verizon New England represents the average rent for the tenant through its lease expiration. Verizon New England’s current annual rent is $4,165,349 ($13.22 PSF). |
(6) | Verizon New England has 222,601 SF that expires on 12/31/2023 and 92,380 SF that expires on 5/21/2024. Verizon New England has the right to terminate up to 222,601 SF of its space effective on 12/31/2020 and 92,380 SF of its space effective 5/31/2021 by giving notice on or before 12/31/2019, subject to a termination fee of $10.2 million (assuming both rights are exercised). In the event Verizon New England exercises this right, the CrossPoint Whole Loan provides for a cash sweep. |
(7) | United States of America (GSA) - IRS may terminate its lease any time after June 1, 2021 by giving 180 days’ notice. |
(8) | Approximately 40,024 SF of Remaining Tenants represents amenities that include: a cafeteria, an auditorium, a conference center and a fitness center. These spaces are represented as occupied square footage with no rent attributed. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the CrossPoint Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling(3) | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 1 | 800 | 0.1% | 0.1% | $72.47 | $57,980 | 0.3% | 0.3% |
2018 | 1 | 17,876 | 1.4% | 1.4% | $21.35 | $381,653 | 1.8% | 2.1% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1.4% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 2.1% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1.4% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 2.1% |
2021 | 4 | 115,962 | 8.8% | 10.2% | $24.36 | $2,824,426 | 13.6% | 15.7% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 10.2% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 15.7% |
2023 | 12 | 263,535 | 20.0% | 30.2% | $15.25 | $4,018,053 | 19.4% | 35.1% |
2024 | 5 | 109,030 | 8.3% | 38.4% | $16.12 | $1,757,684 | 8.5% | 43.6% |
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 38.4% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 43.6% |
2026 | 3 | 57,905 | 4.4% | 42.8% | $29.41 | $1,702,786 | 8.2% | 51.8% |
2027 | 5 | 143,594 | 10.9% | 53.7% | $14.94 | $2,145,286 | 10.4% | 62.2% |
2028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 53.7% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 62.2% |
2029 | 17 | 505,664 | 38.3% | 92.0% | $15.50 | $7,837,792 | 37.8% | 100.0% |
Thereafter(4) | 5 | 45,237 | 3.4% | 95.4% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 60,651 | 4.7% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 53 | 1,320,254 | 100.0% | $16.45 | $20,725,659 | 100.00% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease and that are not considered in the lease rollover schedule. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. UW Base Rent PSF Rolling excludes vacant space. |
(4) | Approximately 40,024 SF represents amenities that include: cafeteria, auditorium, a conference center and a fitness center. Approximately 5,213 SF represents the management office. These spaces are represented as occupied square footage with no rent attributed. |
The Market. The CrossPoint Property is situated between entrance points to U.S. Route 3 (the Northwest Expressway), State Route 2B (the Lowell Connector), and Interstate-495 in Lowell, MA. These access points allow for transportation throughout New England for the tenants and their employees. The population within a 5-mile radius of the CrossPoint Property is 205,069 residents, with a median household income of $70,638, above the national average of $59,039, and in-line with the median household income in the State of Massachusetts at $72,266.
According to a third party research report, the CrossPoint Property is located in the Lowell/Chelmsford submarket of the Greater Boston office market. Overall, the Lowell/Chelmsford submarket has a supply of 19.7 million SF of office space and average asking rents of $18.68 PSF, as of Q3 2017. Of the
A-3-26
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
19.7 million SF of office space in the submarket, approximately 4.9 million SF are Class A properties, and the CrossPoint Property represents a significant portion of the 4.9 million SF supply. This class A submarket has average asking rents of $20.79 PSF and vacancy of 16.1%, as of Q3 2017.
A broader search of Class A, multi-tenanted buildings with rentable SF equal to or greater than 200,000 SF in the suburbs to the west and north/northeast of the Boston CBD yielded a competitive set of 15.5 million SF across 49 buildings, recording a vacancy rate of 8.0% and average rent of $26.65 PSF.
The appraiser identified six comparable office leases signed between 2015 and 2017 relative to the leases signed at the CrossPoint Property. The comparable set had leases ranging from $10.40 to $18.59 PSF on an adjusted basis, with an average of $16.44 PSF, in-line with UW base rent of $16.45 PSF at the CrossPoint Property.
The following table presents certain information relating to the directly competitive buildings with respect to the CrossPoint Property:
Comparable Office Buildings | |||||||
Property Name | Location | Distance from Subject | Net Rentable Area (SF) | Tenant | SF Leased | Rent PSF | Adjusted Rent PSF |
CrossPoint Property | Lowell, MA | - | 1,320,254(1) | $16.45(1) | $16.45(1) | ||
Westford Technology Park | Westford, MA | 5.5 miles | 162,000 | Aspect Software Inc. | 29,930 | $22.00 | $14.03 |
Connector Park | Lowell, MA | 0.2 miles | 199,783 | Altranais Home Care | 2,351 | $18.50 | $11.48 |
Westford Technology Park | Westford, MA | 5.5 miles | 162,000 | Akamai Technologies | 42,286 | $22.75 | $13.65 |
Altid Business Park | Chelmsford, MA | 1.7 miles | 131,430 | Comcast | 131,430 | $16.25 | $18.59 |
1 Executive Drive | Chelmsford, MA | 0.5 miles | 111,454 | Spectro | 7,201 | $19.50 | $10.40 |
Chelmsford Office & Reserve Park | Chelmsford, MA | 1.0 mile | 293,422 | HNTB Corporation | 21,018 | $14.00 | $14.70 |
Total/Wtd. Avg.(2) | 176,682 | 39,036 | $18.08 | $16.44 |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Total/Wtd. Avg. excludes the CrossPoint Property. |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the CrossPoint Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | |||||||||||||
2014(1) | 2015(1) | 2016 | TTM 11/30/2017 | UW | UW PSF | ||||||||
Gross Potential Rent(2) | N/A | N/A | $11,610,171 | $15,907,616 | $21,725,968 | $16.46 | |||||||
Total Recoveries | N/A | N/A | $5,783,881 | $7,648,558 | $11,478,465 | $8.69 | |||||||
Percentage Rent | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0.00 | |||||||
Other Income(3) | N/A | N/A | $671,090 | $812,877 | $854,767 | $0.65 | |||||||
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss(4) | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | ($2,656,355) | ($2.01) | |||||||
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | $18,065,142 | $24,369,051 | $31,402,846 | $23.79 | |||||||
Total Operating Expenses | N/A | N/A | $11,704,653 | $13,056,123 | $13,741,126 | $10.41 | |||||||
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | $6,360,488 | $11,312,928 | $17,661,721 | $13.38 | |||||||
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | $224,443 | $0.17 | |||||||
TI/LC | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | $1,320,254 | $1.00 | |||||||
Net Cash Flow(5) | N/A | N/A | $6,360,488 | $11,312,928 | $16,117,023 | $12.21 | |||||||
Occupancy % | N/A | N/A | 63.7% | 95.4% | 92.0% | ||||||||
NOI DSCR(6) | N/A | N/A | 0.88x | 1.57x | 2.45x | ||||||||
NCF DSCR(6) | N/A | N/A | 0.88x | 1.57x | 2.24x | ||||||||
NOI Debt Yield(6) | N/A | N/A | 4.2% | 7.5% | 11.8% | ||||||||
NCF Debt Yield(6) | N/A | N/A | 4.2% | 7.5% | 10.7% |
(1) | The borrower sponsors acquired the CrossPoint Property in January 2018. As a result, historical financials prior to 2016 are unavailable. |
(2) | UW Gross Potential Rent is based on the underwritten rent roll with vacant spaces grossed up to market rents and includes (i) rent steps through January 2019 of $804,117 and (ii) average rent for Verizon totaling $288,240. |
(3) | Other Income includes contractual income for antenna leases as well as parking income, among other things. |
(4) | Vacancy is underwritten to 8.0% economic vacancy, which is in line with the appraiser’s vacancy conclusion of 8.0%. As of January 11, 2018, the CrossPoint Property was 95.4% occupied. |
(5) | The increase in Net Cash Flow from 2016 to 11/30/2017 TTM is primarily associated with an increase in occupancy from 63.7% in December 2016 to 95.4% in January 2018. In May 2016, Kronos executed a new 12-year lease for 505,664 SF (38.3% of NRA). |
(6) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the CrossPoint Whole Loan. |
Escrows and Reserves. At loan origination, the CrossPoint Borrower deposited in escrow: (i) $240,000 for annual real estate taxes, and (ii) $6,500,000 into the Kronos Free Rent Reserve for outstanding free rent associated with the Kronos lease. The CrossPoint Borrower is required to escrow monthly (i) $240,000 towards annual estimated tax payments, (ii) $18,704 towards replacement reserves and (iii) $110,021 for tenant improvements and leasing
A-3-27
900 Chelmsford Street Lowell, MA 01851 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 3 CrossPoint |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$50,000,000 60.0% 2.24x 11.8% |
commissions, which monthly deposits are subject to a cap of $3.96 million, provided that the cap will apply only so long as (a) at least 88.0% of the NRA of the CrossPoint Property improvements are occupied excluding any tenants that are the subject of a bankruptcy action, have gone-dark in more than 25% of their premises or vacated their respective premises, have given notice of their intent not to renew their respective leases (if the then-current term of such leases will expire within 12 months of the applicable determination date) or have leases which are expiring within twelve months of the applicable date of determination), and (b) the DSCR is at least 1.75x.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The CrossPoint Whole Loan provides for a hard lockbox (which is in place) and springing cash management, which will commence during the continuance of a Cash Management Period (as defined below). During the continuance of a Cash Management Period, funds deposited into the lockbox account will be swept daily into the cash management account and all excess funds in the cash management account (after distribution of monthly amounts due under the CrossPoint Whole Loan) will be retained by the lender.
A “Cash Management Period” will commence upon (i) an event of default, (ii) the occurrence of a bankruptcy action with respect to the CrossPoint Borrower, guarantor or any additional required special purpose entity, (iii) failure after the end of one calendar quarter to maintain a DSCR of at least 1.50x (a “DSCR Trigger”), until the DSCR is at least 1.50x for two consecutive quarters, or (iv) any Lease Trigger Period (as defined below). In addition, the CrossPoint Borrower may terminate a Cash Management Period triggered by a DSCR Trigger upon the deposit with lender of the amount that would, if applied to prepay the CrossPoint Whole Loan, as determined by lender, result in a DSCR of 1.50x.
A “Lease Trigger Period” will commence (i) upon the earlier of (a) 12 months prior to the lease expiration under any of the Kronos or Verizon leases or any replacement lease for at least 150,000 SF of the space currently leased to Kronos or Verizon or under which the applicable tenant pays rent with respect to space currently leased to Kronos or Verizon which accounts for 10% or more of gross income from operations for the CrossPoint Property (Kronos and Verizon and any tenant under any such replacement lease, an “Occupancy Reserve Tenant”), or (b) the date on which any Occupancy Reserve Tenant delivers notice or otherwise indicates its intention not to renew its lease at the CrossPoint Property; (ii) at such time, if ever, as any Occupancy Reserve Tenant (A) declares bankruptcy, (B) gives notice of its intent to terminate or not renew its lease or (C) goes-dark with respect to 15% or more of its leased premises or vacates or gives notice of its intent to vacate its demised premises and either (y) such Occupancy Reserve Tenant (or any guarantor of such tenant’s lease) no longer receives an investment grade unsecured long-term debt rating, or (z) such tenant is not obligated to continue to pay full, unabated rent under its lease, or (iii) February 6, 2027; except the Lease Trigger Period will be suspended if the Lease Trigger Period (a) arises under clause (i) or (ii)and the DSCR is at least 1.75x (excluding rents from the applicable Occupancy Reserve Tenant and any other tenants that are the subject of a bankruptcy action, have gone-dark in more than 25% of their premises or vacated their respective premises, have given notice of their intent not to renew their respective leases (if the then-current term under such leases expires within twelve months of the applicable date of determination) or have leases that are expiring within twelve months of the applicable date of determination), and (b) arises under clause (ii)(C) and the Occupancy Reserve Tenant that triggered the Lease Trigger Period is operating in at least 50% of its premises and the balance of available funds in the Occupancy Reserve is at least equal to $35 PSF for the aggregate total square feet demised under such tenant’s lease.
During the continuance of a Cash Management Period (other than a Cash Management Period triggered by an Event of Default or bankruptcy action with respect to CrossPoint Borrower, guarantor or any other required special purpose entity), the excess cash flow will be held by the lender in an “Occupancy Reserve” and disbursed to the CrossPoint Borrower for (a) approved leasing expenses incurred in connection with the re-tenanting of the Verizon and/or Kronos premises, as applicable, (b) approved leasing expenses incurred with respect to other vacant premises at the CrossPoint Property if funds then on deposit in the rollover reserve are insufficient, and/or (c) approved capital expenditures incurred if funds then on deposit in the replacement reserve are insufficient. During the continuance of a Cash Management period triggered by an event of default or a bankruptcy action with respect to CrossPoint Borrower, guarantor or any other required special purpose entity, all excess funds will be retained by lender as additional collateral for the CrossPoint Whole Loan.
Partial Release: The CrossPoint Borrower may obtain the release of a one-acre parcel on the CrossPoint Property that includes a vacant one-story 13,700 SF (1% of NRA) building located on the northeast corner of the CrossPoint Property, upon, among other things, the delivery of defeasance collateral in an amount equal to $1,440,000. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). None.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Terrorism Insurance. The CrossPoint Borrower is required to obtain insurance against acts of terrorism for loss resulting from perils and acts of terrorism in amounts and with terms and conditions applicable to commercial property, general liability, business income and umbrella liability insurance required pursuant to the CrossPoint Whole Loan documents.
A-3-28
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-29
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
A-3-30
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
A-3-31
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Société Générale | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | |||||
Original Balance(1): | $49,000,000 | Location: | Katy, TX 77449 | |||||
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $49,000,000 | General Property Type: | Industrial | |||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 4.7% | Detailed Property Type: | Warehouse/Distribution | |||||
Loan Purpose: | Recapitalization | Title Vesting: | Fee | |||||
Borrower Sponsor: | Spirit Realty, L.P. | Year Built/Renovated: | 1973, 2000-2005/N/A | |||||
Mortgage Rate: | 5.1410% | Size: | 1,500,596 SF | |||||
Note Date: | 1/22/2018 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF(1): | $56 | |||||
First Payment Date: | 3/1/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF(1): | $46 | |||||
Maturity Date: | 2/1/2028 | Property Manager: | Self-Managed | |||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | |||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 360 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | ||||||
IO Period: | 0 months | UW NOI: | $8,867,565 | |||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | UW NOI Debt Yield(1): | 10.6% | |||||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (24); YM1 (92); O (4) | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(1): | 12.8% | |||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/Springing | UW NCF DSCR(1): | 1.44x | |||||
Additional Debt Type(1): | Pari Passu | Most Recent NOI: | $9,160,273 (12/31/2017) | |||||
Additional Debt Balance(1): | $35,000,000 | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $9,016,467 (12/31/2016) | |||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 3rd Most Recent NOI: | $8,901,505 (12/31/2015) | |||||
Reserves(2) | Most Recent Occupancy: | 100.0% (2/1/2018) | ||||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 100.0% (12/31/2016) | |||
RE Tax: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 100.0% (12/31/2015) | |||
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Appraised Value (as of)(3): | $144,000,000 (10/17/2017) | |||
TI/LC: | $0 | $50,020 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(3): | 58.3% | |||
Replacements: | $0 | $31,262 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1)(3): | 48.2% | |||
Sources and Uses(4) | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(1): | $84,000,000 | 100.0% | Recapitalization: | $83,131,776 | 99.0% | |
Closing Costs: | $868,224 | 1.0% | ||||
Total Sources: | $84,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $84,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | The original principal balance represents a portion of the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan (as defined below), which is comprised of three pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $84,000,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per Unit, Maturity Date Balance per Unit, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan. |
(2) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
(3) | The appraisal concluded a hypothetical “dark value” of $96,000,000 for the Houston Distribution Center Property. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio based on the hypothetical “dark value” are 87.5% and 72.2%, respectively. |
(4) | The Houston Distribution Center Property was unencumbered prior to the funding of the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan. |
The Mortgage Loan. The fourth largest mortgage loan (the “Houston Distribution Center Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan”) evidenced by three pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal amount of $84,000,000. The Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan is secured by the fee interest in a 1,500,596 SF industrial warehouse and distribution center property located in Katy, Texas (the “Houston Distribution Center Property”). Promissory Note A-1 and Note A-2, with an aggregate original principal balance of $49,000,000, represents the Houston Distribution Center Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. The remaining pari passu note, with an original principal balance of $35,000,000 (collectively, the “Houston Distribution Center Pari Passu Companion Loan”), is currently held by Barclays Bank PLC, or affiliates thereof, and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. The Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
Note A-1 | $35,000,000 | $35,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | Yes |
Note A-2 | $14,000,000 | $14,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-3 | $35,000,000 | $35,000,000 | Barclays Bank PLC | No |
Total | $84,000,000 | $84,000,000 |
A-3-32
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is Spirit AS Katy TX, LP (the “Houston Distribution Center Borrower”), a single-purpose Delaware limited partnership. The Houston Distribution Center Borrower is managed and majority owned by Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. (“Spirit”) (NYSE: SRC), a REIT primarily investing in real estate subject to long term, net leases. As of September 30, 2017, Spirit’s gross investment in real estate properties and loans totaled approximately $8.0 billion, representing investments in 2,423 properties which were 99.1% occupied and leased to 421 tenants operating in 30 different industries across 49 states with only one state, Texas, accounting for more than 10% of Spirit’s real estate investment portfolio rental revenue. Spirit has recently announced that it plans to transfer its ownership interest in the Houston Distribution Center Property to its newly formed Spirit Master Trust Agreement REIT (“SMTA”). The transfer is expected to occur in the first half of 2018. SMTA will have approximately $2.7 billion in assets under management comprised of over 925 properties.
The Property. The Houston Distribution Center Property is a 1,500,596 SF single-tenant, industrial warehouse/distribution facility located on a 93.5-acre site in Katy, Texas. The Houston Distribution Center Property consists of four buildings, two of which, were constructed in 1973 and comprise 35.5% of the total Houston Distribution Center Property. The last two buildings to be constructed were developed by the tenant, Academy Sports, between 2000 and 2005 and comprise approximately 64.5% of the total Houston Distribution Center Property. The Houston Distribution Center Property is comprised of 1,425,596 SF of industrial warehouse (95.0% of NRA) and 75,000 SF of office space (5.0% of NRA).
As of February 1, 2018, the Houston Distribution Center Property was 100.0% leased to Academy Sports, which utilizes the Houston Distribution Center Property as its primary distribution center and office space for merchandising and e-commerce employees. The Houston Distribution Center Property is located immediately north of Academy Sports’ approximately 220,000 SF corporate headquarters. The Houston Distribution Property houses 1,300 Academy Sports employees, and services 45% of its retail locations nationwide. Academy Sports has been at the Houston Distribution Center Property since 1990 and has invested $15.0 million in the space, including developing more than 975,000 SF of expansion space and building out extensive racking systems, conveyor belts, and other distribution technology.
The Houston Distribution Center Property features 31 - 50-foot clear ceiling heights and 247 dock high loading doors, some of which have built-up concrete ramps that permit drive-in access. There are 967 parking spaces, resulting in a parking ratio of 0.6 spaces per 1,000 SF of NRA. Academy Sports’ NNN lease at the Houston Distribution Center Property runs through January 31, 2027.
Major Tenants.
Academy Sports (1,500,596 SF, 100.0% of NRA, 100.0% of underwritten base rent). Founded in 1938 by Max Gochman, Academy Sports offers a merchandise mix that extends beyond traditional sporting goods merchandise, carrying an extensive line of name-brands across clothing, shoes, and equipment for competitive sports, physical fitness training, and outdoor recreational activities such as camping, hunting, fishing, and boating. In addition to nationally recognized brand labels, Academy Sports offers a variety of products through a private label including licensed products for apparel, footwear, barbecue equipment and outdoor equipment. Academy Sports generates annual sales exceeding $4.7 billion from its 230 stores across 16 states. Academy Sports employs in excess of 23,000 people throughout the south, southeast and midwest United States. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co L.P. (“KKR”) acquired Academy Sports in 2011.
Academy Sports has occupied 100% of the Houston Distribution Center Property since 1990. Academy Sports commenced its current lease on January 18, 2007 for a 20-year term through January 31, 2027, and has eight five-year renewal options remaining with no termination options.
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the Houston Distribution Center Property:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P) | Tenant SF | Approximate
% of SF |
Annual UW Rent | %
of Total Annual UW Rent |
Annual UW Rent PSF(3) | Lease Expiration |
Academy Sports | NR/NR/NR | 1,500,596 | 100.0% | $9,348,713 | 100.0% | $6.23 | 1/31/2027 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 1,500,596 | 100.0% | $9,348,713 | 100.0% | $6.23 | ||
Vacant Space | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 1,500,596 | 100.0% | $9,348,713 | 100.0% | $6.23 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
A-3-33
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Houston Distribution Center Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2027 | 1 | 1,500,596 | 100.0% | 100.0% | $6.23 | $9,348,713 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
2028 & Beyond | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 1 | 1,500,596 | 100.0% | $6.23 | $9,348,713 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
The Market. The Houston Distribution Center Property is located at 1800 North Mason Road in Katy, Texas, approximately 20 miles west of the Houston central business district. Primary regional access to the Houston Distribution Center Property’s neighborhood is provided by Interstate 10, located approximately one-mile south, and provides east and west access to and from Houston.
According to the appraisal, the Houston Distribution Center Property’s neighborhood consists of a variety of commercial and residential land uses. The immediate area surrounding the Houston Distribution Center Property is a relatively new area, consisting primarily of residential uses built in the 1990’s to the present. According to a third party market research provider, the median home value within a three-mile radius is about $148,028.
The Houston Distribution Center Property is located in Katy, Texas within the Houston- The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas metropolitan statistical area (the “Houston MSA”). Moody’s Economy.com reports that the Houston MSA had a population of approximately 6.9 million as of August 2017, which represents a 1.9% increase over 2016. According to a third party market research report, the estimated 2017 population within a one-, three- and five-mile radius of the Houston Distribution Center Property is 13,077, 119,179 and 257,478, respectively. The estimated 2017 average household income within a one-, three- and five-mile radius of the Houston Distribution Center Property is $88,085, $94,176 and $111,168, respectively.
According to a third party market research report, the Houston Distribution Center Property is located within the Northwest Industrial Submarket. The existing inventory as of the second quarter 2017 was 146,074,764 SF with a vacancy rate of 4.9% and asking rent of $7.44 PSF.
The following table presents recent leasing data at competitive office buildings with respect to the Houston Distribution Center Property:
Comparable Industrial Leases | |||||||
Property Name | Location | Distance to subject (miles) | Lease Size (SF) | Occupancy % | Clear Height | Initial Rent PSF | Lease Type |
Houston Distribution Center Property | Katy, TX | - | 1,500,596(1) | 100.0% | 31-50 ft. | $6.23(1) | NNN |
Ellington Trade Center | Houston, TX | 47.3 | 513,800 | 99.0% | 24 ft. | $6.50 | NNN |
Amazon Schertz Fulfillment Center | Schertz, TX | 162.7 | 1,262,294 | 100.0% | 32 ft. | $5.04 | NNN |
Amazon Fulfillment Center – San Marcos | San Marcos, TX | 147.3 | 855,000 | 100.0% | 41 ft. | $6.25 | NNN |
Claymoore I & II | Houston, TX | 15.9 | 742,250 | 93.0% | 24 ft. | $5.50 | NNN |
Bayou Bend Business Park | Houston, TX | 25.3 | 378,380 | 100.0% | 24 ft. | $3.55 | NNN |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
A-3-34
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Houston Distribution Center Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | |||||
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(1) | $8,924,229 | $9,058,093 | $9,193,964 | $9,348,713 | $6.23 |
Total Recoveries(2) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $274,255 | $0.18 |
Total Other Income | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0.00 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss(3) | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
($481,148) |
($0.32) |
Effective Gross Income | $8,924,229 | $9,058,093 | $9,193,964 | $9,141,820 | $6.09 |
Total Operating Expenses(2) | $22,724 |
$41,626 |
$33,691 |
$274,255 |
$0.18 |
Net Operating Income | $8,901,505 | $9,016,467 | $9,160,273 | $8,867,565 | $5.91 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $375,149 | $0.25 |
TI/LC | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$600,238 |
$0.40 |
Net Cash Flow | $8,901,505 | $9,016,467 | $9,160,273 | $7,892,178 | $5.26 |
Occupancy % | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
NOI DSCR(4) | 1.62x | 1.64x | 1.67x | 1.61x | |
NCF DSCR(4) | 1.62x | 1.64x | 1.67x | 1.44x | |
NOI Debt Yield(4) | 10.6% | 10.7% | 10.9% | 10.6% | |
NCF Debt Yield(4) | 10.6% | 10.7% | 10.9% | 9.4% |
(1) | UW Gross Potential Rent has been underwritten based on the underwritten rent roll, and includes the annual rent step for 2018 of 1.5% or $143,417. |
(2) | The Academy Sports lease is absolute net and all expenses are paid directly by the tenant. UW Total Recoveries is a pass-through adjustment to offset the 3.0% underwritten management fee. |
(3) | The Houston Distribution Center Property is 100.0% occupied as of February 1, 2018. However, vacancy was underwritten to 5.0%. |
(4) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan. |
Escrows and Reserves. Due to the single tenant at the Houston Distribution Center Property (or such other tenant leasing all or a portion of the Houston Distribution Center (“Replacement Tenant”) under a lease approved by the lender pursuant to the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan documents (“Replacement Lease”)) being responsible for the payment of real estate taxes under the lease, monthly collections of real estate taxes are waived, provided that (a) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, (b) Academy Sports (or Replacement Tenant under a Replacement Lease) is in occupancy of the Houston Distribution Center Property and is required by the terms of the Academy Sports lease (or Replacement Lease) to pay all real estate taxes and other charges directly to the applicable taxing authorities and actually does pay such real estate taxes and other charges directly to the applicable taxing authorities, (c) the Houston Distribution Center Borrower has provided written evidence acceptable to the lender that all the real estate taxes and other charges for the applicable tax parcels have been paid in full prior to the date such payment is due, and (d) the Academy Sports lease (or Replacement Lease) is in full force and effect. Monthly escrows of insurance premiums are waived, provided that (a) no event of default has occurred and is continuing, and (b) the Houston Distribution Center Borrower has provided the lender with reasonably satisfactory evidence (as determined by the lender) that the Houston Distribution Center Property is insured in accordance with the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan documents pursuant to a blanket insurance policy reasonably acceptable to lender. The Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan documents also provide for on-going monthly replacement reserves and tenant improvement and leasing commissions in an amount equal to approximately $31,262 and $50,020, respectively.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan has a hard lockbox with springing cash management upon the occurrence and continuance of a Cash Sweep Period (as defined below).
A “Cash Sweep Period” will commence upon the occurrence of (i) the maturity date, (ii) an event of default, (iii) if, as of the last day of the calendar quarter, the debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.20x or (iv) the commencement of a Tenant Trigger Period (as defined below); and will end if (A) the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan has been repaid in full, (B) the maturity date has not occurred and (C) (x) with respect to the matters described in clause (ii) above, such event of default has been cured and no other event of default has occurred and is continuing, (y) with respect to the matter described in clause (iii) above, lender has determined that the Houston Distribution Center Property has achieved a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.20x for two consecutive calendar quarters or (z) with respect to the matter described in clause (iv) above, such Tenant Trigger Period has ended.
A “Tenant Trigger Period” will commence upon (i) the date that is 12 months prior to the end of the term of any Major Lease (as defined below) (including any renewal terms), or (ii) the date required under a Major Lease by which the applicable Major Tenant (as defined below) is required to give notice of its exercise of a renewal option thereunder (and such renewal has not been so exercised); or (iii) the date any Major Lease being surrendered, cancelled or terminated prior to its then current expiration date; or (iv) the date any Major Tenant discontinues its business at its premises (i.e.,“goes dark”) or gives notice that it intends to discontinue its business; or (v) the occurrence and continuance (beyond any applicable notice and cure periods) of a default under any Major Lease by the applicable Major Tenant thereunder; or (vi) the occurrence of a bankruptcy action with respect to a Major Tenant. A Tenant Trigger Period will end upon the earlier to occur of (x) the reasonable determination by the lender that sufficient funds have been accumulated in the special rollover reserve account to pay for all anticipated expenses in connection with the re-leasing of the space under the applicable Major Lease that gave rise to the subject Tenant Trigger Period, including brokerage commissions and tenant improvements, and any anticipated shortfalls of payments required hereunder during any period of time that rents are insufficient as a result of down-time or free rent periods, or (y) the occurrence of any of the following: (1) with respect to a Tenant Trigger Period caused by a matter described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) above, upon the earlier to occur of (A) the date on which the subject Major Tenant irrevocably exercises its renewal or extension option (or otherwise enters into an extension agreement with the Houston Distribution Center Borrower and reasonably acceptable to lender) with respect to all of the space demised under its Major Lease, and in lender’s reasonable judgment, sufficient funds have been accumulated in the special rollover reserve account (during the continuance of the subject Tenant Trigger Period) to pay for all anticipated approved major lease leasing expenses for such Major Lease and any other anticipated expenses in connection with such renewal or extension, or (B) the date on which all of the space demised under the subject Major Lease that gave rise to the subject Tenant Trigger Period
A-3-35
1800 North Mason Road Katy, TX 77449 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 4 Houston Distribution Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$49,000,000 58.3% 1.44x 10.6% |
has been fully leased pursuant to a replacement lease or replacement leases approved by the lender, and entered into in accordance with the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan documents, and all approved Major Lease leasing expenses (and any other expenses in connection with the re-tenanting of such space) have been paid in full; (2) with respect to a Tenant Trigger Period caused by a matter described in clause (v) above, if the subject Major Tenant default has been cured, and no other Major Tenant default has occurred for a period of six consecutive months following such cure; or (3) with respect to a Tenant Trigger Period caused by a matter described in clause (vi) above, if the applicable Major Tenant bankruptcy action has terminated and the applicable Major Lease has been affirmed, assumed or assigned in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the lender.
A “Major Lease” means the Academy Sports lease, and any other lease which, together with all other leases to the same tenant or its affiliates, demises twenty-percent or more of the rentable square feet of the Houston Distribution Center Property.
A “Major Tenant” means any tenant under either a Major Lease, or under one or more leases (leased by such tenant and/or its affiliates), which when taken together cover in the aggregate twenty-percent or more of the rentable square feet of the Houston Distribution Center Property.
Right of First Refusal. Academy Sports has a right of first refusal to purchase the Houston Distribution Center Property in the event that the Houston Distribution Center Borrower receives a bona fide offer from a third party to purchase the Houston Distribution Center Property. In such event, the Houston Distribution Center Borrower will extend the right of first refusal to purchase the Houston Distribution Center Property on the terms of such offer. Academy Sports right of first refusal is fully subordinated to the Houston Distribution Center Whole Loan and does not apply to foreclosure or deed-in-lieu thereof.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Release of Property. Not permitted.
Terrorism Insurance. The Houston Distribution Center Borrower is required to obtain and maintain or cause to be obtained and maintained property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and business income or rental loss insurance that covers perils of terrorism and acts of terrorism, both foreign and domestic.
A-3-36
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-37
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
A-3-38
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
A-3-39
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
A-3-40
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Mortgaged Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance: | $47,500,000 | Location: | Corpus Christi, TX 78411 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $47,500,000 | General Property Type: | Retail | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 4.5% | Detailed Property Type: | Anchored | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | J. Kenneth Dunn | Year Built/Renovated: | 1989 / 2017 | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.5300% | Size: | 377,261 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 1/18/2018 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF: | $126 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 3/6/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF: | $126 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2028 | Property Manager: | Rainer Realty Management, LLC | ||||
Original Term to Maturity | 120 months | (borrower-related) | |||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | ||||||
Seasoning: | 0 month | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (24); DEF (92); O (4) | UW NOI: | $5,404,604 | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Springing/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 11.4% | ||||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 11.4% | ||||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 2.27x | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | Most Recent NOI: | $5,551,028 (10/31/2017 TTM) | ||||
Reserves(1) | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $5,359,919 (12/31/2016) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 3rd Most Recent NOI: | $5,142,268 (12/31/2015) | ||
RE Tax: | $145,269 | $69,176 | N/A | Most Recent Occupancy: | 97.0% (1/4/2018) | ||
Insurance: | $14,780 | $14,076 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 98.8% (12/31/2016) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | $5,659 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 98.6% (12/31/2015) | ||
TI/LC: | $1,000,000 | Springing | $1,500,000 | Appraised Value (as of): | $78,900,000 (11/17/2017) | ||
Deferred Maintenance: | $5,679 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 60.2% | ||
Environmental Remediation: | $3,000 | (1) | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 60.2% | ||
Sources and Uses
| |||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | ||
Loan Amount: | $47,500,000 | 65.0% | Purchase Price: | $70,645,000 | 96.7% | ||
Borrower Equity: | $25,544,399 | 35.0% | Closing Costs: | $1,230,672 | 1.7% | ||
Reserves: | $1,168,727 | 1.6% | |||||
Total Sources: | $73,044,399 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $73,044,399 | 100.0% | ||
(1) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
The Mortgage Loan. The fifth largest mortgage loan (the “Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a promissory note in the original principal amount of $47,500,000 secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering a 377,261 SF retail power center located in Corpus Christi, Texas (the “Moore Plaza Property”). The proceeds of the Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan were used to purchase the Moore Plaza Property, pay closing costs and fund upfront reserves.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is Rainier Moore Plaza Acquisitions, LLC (the “Moore Plaza Borrower”), a Delaware limited liability company structured to be bankruptcy-remote. The Moore Plaza Borrower is managed by Rainier Moore Plaza Manager, LLC and is owned by Rainier Moore Plaza, LLC (100%, Sole Member). Rainier Moore Plaza, LLC is owned by CIL 2 REIT, LLC (49.5%, Member), Newport Moore Plaza LLC (30.2%, Member), and Rainier Moore Plaza Investors, LP (20.3%, Member). CIL 2 REIT, LLC is owned solely by CIL 2, LLC. CIL 2 LLC is owned by EMIRA Property Holdings Limited (South African Public REIT; 96.84%, Member) and Continuum Holdings Limited (Seychelles IBC; 3.16%, Member). Rainier Moore Plaza Investors, LP is owned by Individual HNW Investors (Limited Partners), and Rainier Moore Plaza Investors GP, LLC (General Partner). Rainier Moore Plaza Investors GP, LLC is managed by RRI GP, LLC, which is owned by its members, J. Kenneth Dunn, Timothy C. Nichols, Daniel S. Lovell, and Thomas B. Mock.
The non-recourse carveout guarantor of the Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan is J. Kenneth Dunn of Rainier Realty Investments, LP. Rainier Realty Investments, L.P. is an affiliate of The Rainier Companies (“Rainier”) in Dallas, Texas. Founded in 2003, Rainier has over $1.5 billion of investment assets under management for individual, corporate and institutional investment partners. Rainier’s portfolio includes multifamily, office, retail, medical office, hotel/lifestyle, and government building assets. Co-founders Tim Nichols and J. Kenneth Dunn have been investing together since 1996 and the principals at Rainier have more than one hundred years of collective experience in real estate acquisitions, financing and operations. Rainier targets value-add real estate investment opportunities with high-quality developers and operators on projects with a primary focus is in the southern United States.
A-3-41
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
The Property. The Moore Plaza Property is a 377,261 SF anchored retail center located in Corpus Christi, within Nueces County, approximately 10 miles southeast of Corpus Christi central business district. The improvements consist of five multi-tenant, single-story buildings that were constructed in 1989. The Moore Plaza Property is situated on a 34.19-acre site with 1,790 surface parking spaces (approximately 4.74 per 1,000 SF). As of the January 4, 2018 rent roll, the Moore Plaza Property was 97.0% leased by a mix of 48 national, regional and local tenants. The Moore Plaza Property is anchored by Hobby Lobby and Mardel (101,760 SF), Marshall’s (32,228 SF), Stein Mart (28,157 SF), Office Depot (26,520 SF), Cost Plus World Market (17,340 SF), Old Navy (15,000 SF), and junior anchored by Half Price Books (12,321 SF) and Party City (12,000 SF). Additionally, the Moore Plaza Property is shadow-anchored by Target and H-E-B stores. The remaining tenant base is comprised of national, regional and local tenants, with no tenant occupying greater than 2.5% of the Moore Plaza Property’s net rentable area (“NRA”).
Major Tenants.
Hobby Lobby and Mardel (101,760 SF, 27.0% of NRA, 14.5% of underwritten rent). Founded in 1970, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (“Hobby Lobby”) owns and operates a chain of arts and crafts stores in the United States. The company is based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and is the largest privately owned arts-and-crafts retailer employing approximately 32,000 employees and operating more than 700 stores in 47 states. The company offers products under various categories including hobbies, picture framing, jewelry making, fabrics, floral and wedding supplies, cards and party ware, baskets, wearable art, home accents and holiday merchandise. Founded in 1981 by Mart Green, Mardel is a book store and education supplier which specializes in meeting the needs of homeschooling parents, educators, and all kinds of Christian lifestyles. There are 34 stores located in the central region of the United States, including Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, Colorado and Louisiana. Mardel’s corporate location is headquartered with Hobby Lobby’s complex in Oklahoma City and Mardel has more than 800 employees. In 2010, Hobby Lobby expanded its premise from 66,000 SF to its current size, changed the trade name to Hobby Lobby and Mardel. Hobby Lobby has been a tenant at the Moore Plaza Property since 1993 under a lease that commenced September 11, 1993 and expires September 30, 2030, with two 5-year extension options remaining.
Marshall’s (32,228 SF, 8.5% of NRA, 5.1% of underwritten rent). Marshall’s is owned by the TJX Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TJX), the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the United States and worldwide. The company offers a changing assortment of brand name and designer merchandise generally at discounted prices. T.J. Maxx and Marshall’s chains are collectively the largest off-price retailer in the United States with a total of 2,221 stores, which includes 1,035 Marshall’s stores. The company founded T.J. Maxx in 1976 and acquired Marshall’s in 1995. Marshall’s has been a tenant at the Moore Plaza Property since 2001 under a lease that commenced May 20, 2001 and expires May 31, 2021, with one 5-year extension option remaining and no termination options.
Stein Mart (28,157 SF, 7.5% of NRA, 4.2% of underwritten rent). Stein Mart (NYSE: SMRT) is a national discount department store chain that was founded in the early 1900’s and is based in Jacksonville, Florida. Stein Mart locations are primarily concentrated in the Southeast and Texas and carry an assortment of merchandise including moderate to better fashion apparel for women and men, as well as accessories, shoes and home fashions, all offered at prices competitive with off-price retail chains. Stein Mart currently operates 290 stores in 31 states plus an online store, steinmart.com. Stein Mart has been a tenant at the Moore Plaza Property since 2010 under a lease that commenced March 13, 2010 and expires March 31, 2020, with three 5-year extension options remaining and no termination options. Additionally, Stein Mart pays $250 per month for the placement of a 2,000 SF storage container directly behind its premises.
Office Depot (26,520 SF, 7.0% of NRA, 5.3% of underwritten rent). Office Depot, Inc. provides a broad selection of products and services to consumers and businesses. Office Depot, Inc. currently offers products in the supplies, technology, and furniture categories. Most of its retail stores also offer copy and print services to its customers. Office Depot, Inc. currently operates 1,441 office supply stores in North America. The average store is currently over 20,000 SF, with most stores located in Texas, California, and Florida. Office Depot has been a tenant at the Moore Plaza Property since 1990 under a lease that commenced July 1, 1990 and expires June 30, 2020, with one 5-year renewal option remaining.
Cost Plus World Market (19,673 SF, 5.2% of NRA, 3.7% of underwritten rent). Cost Plus World Market is a retailer that specializes in providing goods from all over the world. Cost Plus World Market is an omnichannel retailer selling a wide range of home decorating items, furniture, gifts, holiday and other seasonal items, and specialty food and beverages. Cost Plus World Market is a value retailer that provides solutions for entertaining and decorating needs. Cost Plus World Market currently operates 276 stores throughout the United States. Cost Plus World Market is owned by Bed Bath and Beyond Inc. Cost Plus World Market has been a tenant at the Moore Plaza Property since 2003 under a lease that commenced November 26, 2003 and expires January 31, 2018, with two 5-year renewal options remaining and no termination options. Cost Plus World Market leases an additional storage space consisting of 2,333 SF and pays $2.57 PSF throughout the lease term.
A-3-42
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
The following table presents a summary regarding the largest tenants at the Moore Plaza Property.
Tenant Summary(1) | ||||||||||
Tenant Name | Credit
Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/ S&P)(2) |
Tenant SF |
Approximate
% of SF |
Annual
UW Base Rent |
% of Annual UW Base Rent | Annual UW Base Rent PSF(3) | Most Recently Reported Sales |
Occ. Cost %(4) |
Lease Expiration | |
$ |
PSF | |||||||||
Anchor/Major Tenants | ||||||||||
Hobby Lobby and Mardel | NR/NR/NR | 101,760 | 27.0% | $829,200 | 14.5% | $8.15 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9/30/2030 |
Marshall’s | NR/A2/A+ | 32,228 | 8.5% | $294,000 | 5.1% | $9.12 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 5/31/2021 |
Stein Mart(5) | NR/NR/NR | 28,157 | 7.5% | $242,334 | 4.2% | $8.61 | $3,582,109 | $127 | 9.4% | 3/31/2020 |
Office Depot | NR/B1/NR | 26,520 | 7.0% | $304,980 | 5.3% | $11.50 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 6/30/2020 |
Cost Plus World Market(6) | NR/Baa1/BBB+ | 19,673 | 5.2% | $214,080 | 3.7% | $10.88 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Various |
Old Navy | BB+/Baa2/BB+ | 15,000 | 4.0% | $180,000 | 3.1% | $12.00 | $7,195,538(7) | $480 | 3.2% | 1/31/2023 |
Half Price Books | NR/NR/NR | 12,321 | 3.3% | $227,939 | 4.0% | $18.50 | $2,406,098(7) | $195 | 12.1% | 6/30/2019 |
Party City | NR/NR/NR | 12,000 | 3.2% | $216,000 | 3.8% | $18.00 | $3,009,429(8) | $251 | 8.4% | 4/30/2028 |
Kirkland’s, Inc. | NR/NR/NR | 8,626 | 2.3% | $150,955 | 2.6% | $17.50 | $1,917,478(9) | $222 | 10.1% | 1/31/2021 |
Avenue Stores, LLC | NR/NR/NR | 5,606 | 1.5% | $95,054 | 1.7% | $16.96 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1/31/2021 |
Anchor/Major Tenants | 261,891 | 69.4% | $2,754,541 | 48.1% | $10.52 | |||||
Other Tenants | 103,262 | 27.4% | $2,968,468 | 51.9% | $28.75 | |||||
Vacant Space(10) | 12,108 | 3.2% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | |||||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 377,261 | 100.0% | $5,723,009 | 100.0% | $15.67 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. Annual UW Base Rent PSF excludes vacant space. |
(4) | Occ Cost % is based on the contractual rent as of the January 4, 2018 rent roll and Underwritten Reimbursements divided by most recently reported sales. |
(5) | Annual UW Base Rent includes $3,000 in annual rent for the placement of storage container directly behind the Moore Plaza Property, the storage container is on a month to month lease. Most Recently Reported Sales reflect the 12-month period ending March 2017. |
(6) | Annual UW Base Rent includes $6,000 in annual rent for additional storage space consisting of 2,333 SF which expires on January 31, 2019. The Cost Plus World Market lease expires January 31, 2018. |
(7) | Most Recently Reported Sales reflect the 12-month period ending September 2017. |
(8) | Most Recently Reported Sales reflect the 12-month period ending April 2017. |
(9) | Most Recently Reported Sales reflect the 12-month period ending March 2017. |
(10) | Vacant Space includes 937 SF of storage space which does not contribute any rent or have frontage space. |
The following table presents historical sales information for the anchor tenants at the Moore Plaza Property:
Historical Sales Summary(1) | ||||||||||||
3rd Most Recent Reported Sales | 2nd Most Recent Reported Sales | Most Recent Reported Sales | ||||||||||
Tenant | Sales ($) | Sales (PSF) |
Occ. Cost(2) |
Sales ($) | Sales (PSF) |
Occ. Cost(2) |
Sales ($) | Sales (PSF) |
Occ. Cost(2) |
|||
Hobby Lobby and Mardel | $14,307,040 | $141 | 8.8% | $13,379,360 | $131 | 9.4% | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Marshall’s | $9,031,246 | $280 | 4.6% | $8,853,665 | $275 | 4.7% | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Stein Mart | $4,166,963 | $148 | 8.1% | N/A | N/A | N/A | $3,582,109 | $127 | 9.4% | |||
Office Depot | $10,279,428 | $388 | 4.2% | $9,628,453 | $363 | 4.5% | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Cost Plus World Market | $3,154,030 | $182 | 8.9% | $3,145,499 | $181 | 8.9% | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Old Navy | $7,239,493 | $483 | 3.2% | $6,927,303 | $462 | 3.3% | $7,195,538 | $480 | 3.2% | |||
Half Price Books | $2,513,772 | $204 | 11.6% | $2,505,499 | $203 | 11.6% | $2,406,098 | $195 | 12.1% | |||
Party City | $3,391,603 | $283 | 7.5% | $3,096,495 | $258 | 8.2% | $3,009,429 | $251 | 8.4% | |||
Kirkland’s, Inc. | $2,132,364 | $247 | 9.1% | $1,961,746 | $227 | 9.8% | $1,917,478 | $222 | 10.1% | |||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | $56,215,939 | $227 | 7.5% | $49,498,020 | $218 | 7.8% | $18,110,652 | $238 | 8.5% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Occ. Cost % is based on the base rent as of the January 4, 2018 rent roll and Underwritten Reimbursements divided by the respective year’s reported sales. |
A-3-43
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover at the Moore Plaza Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | #
of Leases Rolling |
SF Rolling(3) | Approx.
% of Total SF Rolling |
Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW
Base Rent PSF Rolling(3) |
Total
UW Base Rent Rolling |
Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 3 | 5,672 | 1.5% | 1.5% | $3.17 | $18,000 | 0.3% | 0.3% |
2018 | 6 | 29,248 | 7.8% | 9.3% | $20.20 | $590,712 | 10.3% | 10.6% |
2019 | 8 | 24,329 | 6.4% | 15.7% | $22.64 | $550,702 | 9.6% | 20.3% |
2020 | 12 | 84,377 | 22.4% | 38.1% | $17.48 | $1,475,237 | 25.8% | 46.0% |
2021 | 8 | 59,900 | 15.9% | 53.9% | $15.12 | $905,534 | 15.8% | 61.9% |
2022 | 7 | 23,314 | 6.2% | 60.1% | $27.19 | $633,849 | 11.1% | 72.9% |
2023 | 3 | 20,210 | 5.4% | 65.5% | $17.41 | $351,770 | 6.1% | 79.1% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 65.5% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 79.1% |
2025 | 1 | 4,343 | 1.2% | 66.6% | $35.00 | $152,005 | 2.7% | 81.7% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 66.6% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 81.7% |
2027 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 66.6% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 81.7% |
2028 & Beyond | 4 | 113,760 | 30.2% | 96.8% | $9.19 | $1,045,200 | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Vacant(4) | 0 | 12,108 | 3.2% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 52 | 377,261 | 100.0% | $15.67 | $5,723,009 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the stated expiration date of the subject lease or leases which are not considered in the lease rollover schedule. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. Annual UW Rent PSF Rolling excludes vacant space. |
(4) | SF Rolling excludes 937 SF of storage space which does not contribute any rent or have frontage space. |
The Market. The Moore Plaza Property is located in Corpus Christi, Nueces County, approximately 10 miles southeast of the Corpus Christi central business district. Corpus Christi is located between Padre Island and Rockport, along the Gulf of Mexico. Access to the Moore Plaza Property neighborhood is provided by Interstate 37 and the Crosstown Expressway. Interstate 37 connects the Moore Plaza Property neighborhood with the City of San Antonio to the northwest. The Crosstown Expressway provides north-south access to the area. This arterial merges with Interstate 37 in the northwestern portion of Corpus Christi. South Padre Island Drive is a major connector, proceeding south from Interstate 37 to Padre Island and access to Mustang Island and Port Aransas. Secondary access to the neighborhood is provided by Staples Street, Morgan Avenue and Shoreline Boulevard. Moore Plaza Property is located less than 0.25 miles from the intersection of South Padre Island Drive and Blanche Moore Drive, which has an average daily traffic count of 151,328 vehicles per day.
The neighborhood surrounding the Moore Plaza Property consists of a mixture of commercial, industrial and residential development. The immediate area surrounding the Moore Plaza Property consists of development built in the 1970s. Located directly across South Padre Island Drive are the Corpus Christi’s two malls, La Palmera Mall and Sunrise Mall. The La Palmera is a super-regional mall that features over 100 stores, as well as a movie theater and a two-story exotic fish aquarium. The mall is anchored by Bealls, Dillard’s, Macy’s, and JCPenney. La Palmera underwent an estimated $60 million renovation in 2010, becoming the nation’s first LEED certified mall. In April 2012, the mall ownership purchased the 19.298 acre former Staples Center to redevelop into a 200,000 SF extension of retail space known as The Shops at La Palmera. The Shops at La Palmera includes tenants such as Dick’s Sporting Goods, DSW, Jared The Galleria of Jewelry, T.J. Maxx, HomeGoods, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Corner Bakery Cafe. Sunrise Mall is anchored by Macy’s, Sears and JCPenney. Other retailers located along South Padre Island Drive also include Home Depot, Barnes and Noble, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Sam’s Club, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Ross Dress for Less, Best Buy and Michael’s. Other notable developments within the Moore Plaza Property’s neighborhood include Naval Air Station Corpus Christi (8.4 miles east), the single largest employer in the city. According to the appraisal, the 2017 estimated population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Moore Plaza Property is 16,120, 119,582, and 213,093, respectively. The 2017 average household income within the same radius is $52,680, $69,109, and $71,307, respectively.
According to a third party market research report, the Moore Plaza Property is located within the Corpus Christi retail market and the Mid City retail submarket. As of the second quarter 2017, the Corpus Christ retail market reported an overall vacancy rate of 3.2%, and an average asking rental rate of $13.68 PSF. As of second quarter 2017, the Corpus Christi retail market reported net absorption of 733,508 SF. The Mid City retail submarket reported an overall vacancy rate of 4.2% and an average asking rental rate of $15.75 PSF. As of second quarter 2017, the Mid City retail market reported absorption of 27,058 SF.
A-3-44
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
The following table presents competitive retail properties with respect to the Moore Plaza Property:
Competitive Property Summary | ||||||
Property Name | Type | Year Built/Renovated | Size (SF) | Total Occupancy | Anchor Tenants | Distance to Subject |
Moore Plaza | Anchored Retail | 1989/2017 | 377,261 | 97.0%(1) | Hobby Lobby, Mardel, Marshall’s, Stein Mart, Office Depot, Cost Plus World Market, Old Navy, Half Price Books, Party City, Kirkland’s Inc., Avenue Stores, LLC | N/A |
The Shops at La Palmera | Power Center | 1985/2016 | 219,540 | 97.0% | Dick’s Sporting Goods, Big Lots, DSW, T.J. Maxx | 0.5 miles |
Saratoga Town Center | Neighborhood Center | 2003/2007 | 64,755 | 98.0% | Petco | 2.0 miles |
Portairs Shopping Center | Neighborhood Center | 1953/1998 | 116,710 | 99.0% | CVS Pharmacy, Dollar Tree, Beall’s, Family Dollar | 5.7 miles |
5625 S. Padre Island Drive | Un-anchored Retail Strip | 1967/N/A | 65,449 | 94.0% | N/A | 0.5 miles |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll as of January 4, 2018. |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Moore Plaza Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 10/30/2017 TTM | UW | UW PSF | |
Base Rent(1) | $5,130,938 | $5,385,215 | $5,603,065 | $5,760,816 | $6,058,139 | $16.06 |
Total Recoveries | $1,508,569 | $1,654,678 | $1,574,153 | $1,639,782 | $1,591,379 | $4.22 |
Other Income(2) | $157,656 | $172,674 | $151,869 | $145,866 | $145,866 | $0.39 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | ($25,466) |
$8,663 |
($7,111) |
$15,678 |
($382,476) |
($1.01) |
Effective Gross Income | $6,771,697 | $7,221,230 | $7,321,976 | $7,562,142 | $7,412,908 | $19.65 |
Total Expenses | $2,022,691 |
$2,078,962 |
$1,962,057 |
$2,011,114 |
$2,008,304 |
$5.32 |
Net Operating Income | $4,749,006 | $5,142,268 | $5,359,919 | $5,551,028 | $5,404,604 | $14.33 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $67,907 | $0.18 |
TI/LC | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$377,261 |
$1.00 |
Net Cash Flow | $4,749,006 | $5,142,268 | $5,359,919 | $5,551,028 | $4,959,436 | $13.15 |
Occupancy %(3) | 97.7% | 98.6% | 98.8% | 99.3% | 95.0% | |
NOI DSCR | 2.18x | 2.36x | 2.46x | 2.54x | 2.48x | |
NCF DSCR | 2.18x | 2.36x | 2.46x | 2.54x | 2.27x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 10.0% | 10.8% | 11.3% | 11.7% | 11.4% | |
NCF Debt Yield | 10.0% | 10.8% | 11.3% | 11.7% | 10.4% |
(1) | Underwritten Rent is based on the rent roll dated January 4, 2018 and includes rent steps through December 1, 2018 totaling $63,742. |
(2) | Other Income includes Targets reciprocal easement agreement billing amount, late fees, NSF fees, and miscellaneous income. |
(3) | Underwritten Occupancy % based on the underwritten economic vacancy of 5.0% |
Escrows and Reserves. The Moore Plaza Borrower deposited $145,269 upfront for annual real estate taxes; $14,780 for annual insurance premiums; $1,000,000 for TI/LC reserves, $5,679 for deferred maintenance and $3,000 for environmental remediation funds for the extension of the environmental liability insurance policy. The Moore Plaza Borrower will be required to escrow monthly 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, 1/12 of the annual estimated insurance premiums, replacement reserves of $5,659, tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve of $31,438 when TI/LC reserve balance falls below $500,000, subject to a cap of $1,500,000. Each January, through the term of the Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan, the Moore Plaza Borrower will be required to deposit $3,000 in the environmental reserve for the extension of the environmental liability insurance policy.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan provides for a springing lockbox and springing cash management. During the occurrence and continuance of a Cash Management Trigger Event (as defined below), the Moore Plaza Borrower is required to instruct tenants to deposit rents and other amounts due into the lockbox account and funds in the lockbox account are required to be transferred to the cash management account within one business day. All funds in the cash management are required to be applied on each monthly payment date in accordance with the Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan documents. Pursuant to the Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan documents, all excess funds on deposit (after payment of monthly reserve deposits, debt service payment and cash management bank fees) will be applied as follows (a) if a Cash Sweep Event (as defined below) period is not in effect, to the Moore Plaza Borrower, (b) if a Cash Sweep Event is in effect due to the existence of a Critical Tenant Trigger Event (as defined below) to the Critical Tenant TI/LC account until the applicable Critical Tenant Trigger Event cure has occurred and (c) if a Cash Sweep Event is in effect but a Critical Tenant Trigger Event is not in effect, then to the lender controlled excess cash flow account.
A-3-45
5425 South Padre Island Corpus Christi, TX 78411 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 5 Moore Plaza |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$47,500,000 60.2% 2.27x 11.4% |
A ”Cash Management Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) an event of default, (ii) any bankruptcy action of the Moore Plaza Borrower, the guarantor or manager, provided that if the bankruptcy action of the manager involves a manager who is not affiliated with the Moore Plaza Borrower, then the Moore Plaza Borrower will have a period of 30 days to terminate and replace the manager before a Cash Management Trigger Event occurs; (iii) a debt service coverage ratio based on the trailing 12-month period falling below 1.15x, or (iv) a Critical Tenant Trigger Event. A Cash Management Event will continue until, in regard to clause (i) above, when such event of default has been cured or waived, in regard to clause (ii) above, when such bankruptcy petition has been discharged, stayed, or dismissed within 30 days of such filing among other conditions for the Moore Plaza Borrower or guarantor and within 120 days for the property manager (or, solely with respect to the bankruptcy of the property manager, when the Moore Plaza Borrower has replaced the property manager with a qualified property manager acceptable to the lender), in regard to clause (iii) above, the date the trailing 12-month amortizing net operating income debt service coverage ratio is greater than 1.20x for two consecutive calendar quarters, or in regard to clause (iv) above, the date a Critical Tenant Trigger Event cure has occurred.
A “Cash Sweep Event” will occur upon (i) an event of default, (ii) any bankruptcy action of the Moore Plaza Borrower, the guarantor or manager, provided that if the bankruptcy action of the manager involves a manager who is not affiliated with the Moore Plaza Borrower, then the Moore Plaza Borrower will have a period of 30 days to terminate and replace the manager before a Cash Sweep Event occurs (iii) a debt service coverage ratio based on the trailing 12-month period falling below 1.15x; unless, within five days of such date, the Moore Plaza Borrower deposits $1,250,000 in cash in the Critical Tenant TI/LC account for each year the Moore Plaza Borrower desires to avoid a Cash Sweep Event as it relates to clause (iii), or (iv) a Critical Tenant Trigger Event, unless, within five days of such date, the Moore Plaza Borrower deposits an amount equal to $1,526,400 in cash in the Critical Tenant TI/LC account as it relates to clause (iv). A Cash Sweep Event will continue until, in regard to clause (i) above, when such event of default has been cured or waived, in regard to clause (ii) above, when such bankruptcy petition has been discharged, stayed, or dismissed within 30 days of such filing among other conditions for Moore Plaza Borrower or guarantor and within 120 days for the property manager (or, solely with respect to the bankruptcy of the property manager, when the Moore Plaza Borrower has replaced the property manager with a qualified property manager acceptable to the lender), in regard to clause (iii) above, the date the trailing 12-month amortizing net operating income debt service coverage ratio is greater than 1.20x for two consecutive calendar quarters, or in regard to clause (iv) above, the date a Critical Tenant Trigger Event cure has occurred.
A “Critical Tenant Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) Hobby Lobby or any tenant leasing 100,000 SF or more of the space at the Moore Plaza Property (each, a “Critical Tenant”) gives notice of its intention to terminate its lease, or any Critical Tenant other than Hobby Lobby give notice of its intention to not extend or renew its lease, (ii) on or prior to twelve (12) months prior to the expiration date the Critical Tenant which is not Hobby Lobby fails to give notice of its election to renew its lease, (iii) on or prior to the date on which the Critical Tenant which is not Hobby Lobby is required under its lease to notify landlord of its election to renew its lease, if Critical Tenant fails to give such notice, (iv) an event of default under the Hobby Lobby lease, or any other lease with a Critical Tenant, exists, (v) a bankruptcy action of the Critical Tenant or guarantor of any Critical Tenant lease occurs, or (vi) if the Critical Tenant discontinues its normal business operations at the Moore Plaza Property. A Critical Tenant Trigger Event will end (a) with respect to clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) the date that (1) the Critical Tenant lease extension is executed and delivered by the Moore Plaza Borrower along with related tenant improvements costs, leasing commissions and other material costs and expenses have been deposited into the Critical Tenant TI/LC account, or (2) a Critical Tenant Space Re-tenanting Event (as defined below) has occurred, (b) with respect to clause (iv) above, after a cure of applicable event of default, (c) with respect to clause (v) above, after an affirmation of the Critical Tenant lease in the applicable bankruptcy proceeding and confirmation that the Critical Tenant is actually paying all rents and other amounts under its lease, or (d) with respect to clause (vi) above, the Critical Tenant re-commences its normal business operations at the Moore Plaza Property or a Critical Tenant Space Re-tenanting Event has occurred.
A “Critical Tenant Space Re-tenanting Event” will occur on the date each of the following conditions have been satisfied: (i) the Critical Tenant space is leased to one or more replacement tenants for a term of at least five years and on terms that are acceptable to the lender, (ii) all tenant improvement costs, leasing commissions and other material costs and expenses relating to the re-letting of the space have been paid in full, and (iii) the replacement tenant(s) are conducting normal business operations at the related Critical Tenant space.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Release of Property. Not permitted.
Environmental Matters. The Phase I environmental report dated September 19, 2017 identified historical use of a portion of the Moore Plaza Property as an on-site dry cleaner and recommended a Phase II environmental report. A limited subsurface investigation report dated November 28, 2017 recommended entering the Moore Plaza Mortgaged Property into the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The environmental condition relating to the dry cleaner is expected to be remediated by the Moore Plaza Borrower under TCEQ supervision. Additionally, the borrower obtained an environmental impairment liability (“EIL”) insurance policy, from Beazley (Lloyd’s of London Syndicates 623/2623) (rated “A” by A.M. Best), which lists the borrower as the first named insured and the lender, with its successors, assigns, and/or affiliates as additional named insured. The EIL policy has a term of 121 months, with an optional extended reporting period of 36 months, policy limits of $2,000,000 per incident and in the aggregate, with a $100,000 deductible per incident. The policy premium was paid at origination, and the Moore Plaza Borrower is required to deposit $3,000 each January during the term of the Moore Plaza Mortgage Loan into an environmental remediation reserve account. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Mortgage Pool Characteristics—Environmental Considerations”.
Terrorism Insurance. The Moore Plaza Borrower is required to obtain and maintain property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and business income or rental loss insurance that covers perils of terrorism and acts of terrorism, both foreign and domestic.
A-3-46
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-47
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
A-3-48
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
A-3-49
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
A-3-50
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | UBS AG | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Portfolio | |||
Original Balance(1): | $45,000,000 | Location: | Florham Park, 07932 | |||
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $45,000,000 | General Property Type: | Office | |||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 4.3% | Detailed Property Type: | Suburban | |||
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Title Vesting: | Fee | |||
Borrower Sponsors:
|
Normandy Real Estate Fund, L.P.; Normandy Real Estate Management, LLC |
Year Built/Renovated: | Various/Various | |||
Size: | 354,381 SF | |||||
Mortgage Rate: | 5.0815% | Cut-off Date Balance per SF(1): | $176 | |||
Note Date: | 1/19/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF(1): | $176 | |||
First Payment Date: | 3/6/2018 |
Property Manager: |
Normandy FundSub Management Co., LLC (borrower-related) | |||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2028 | |||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | |||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | |||||
IO Period: | 120 months | |||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | |||||
Prepayment Provisions(2): | LO (24); DEF (89); O (7) | Underwriting and Financial Information | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/Springing | UW NOI(5): | $6,606,415 | |||
Additional Debt Type(1)(3): | Pari Passu/Mezzanine | UW NOI Debt Yield(1): | 10.6% | |||
Additional Debt Balance(1)(3): | $17,500,000/$12,500,000 | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(1): | 10.6% | |||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | UW NCF DSCR(1): | 1.80x | |||
Reserves(4) | Most Recent NOI(5): | $3,510,694 (9/30/2017 TTM) | ||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 2nd Most Recent NOI(5): | $3,097,981 (12/31/2016) | |
RE Tax: | $168,292 | $64,728 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent NOI(5): | $5,121,716 (12/31/2015) | |
Insurance: | $29,273 | $4,435 | N/A | Most Recent Occupancy(6): | 94.3% (12/6/2017) | |
Replacements: | $0 | $5,906 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 94.3% (9/30/2017) | |
TI/LC: | $0 | $44,298 | $2,000,000 | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 92.2% (12/31/2016) | |
Deferred Maintenance: | $37,500 | $0 | N/A | Appraised Value (as of)(7): | $96,000,000 (12/4/2017) | |
Tenant Obligation: | $5,044,401 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(7): | 65.1% | |
Environmental Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1)(7): | 65.1% |
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(1): | $62,500,000 | 83.3% | Loan Payoff: | $64,367,005 | 85.8% | |
Mezzanine Loan: | $12,500,000 | 16.7% | Reserves: | $5,279,467 | 7.0% | |
Closing Costs: | $1,573,010 | 2.1% | ||||
Return of Equity: | $3,780,519 | 5.0% | ||||
Total Sources: | $75,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $75,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | The Park Place at Florham Park Mortgage Loan (as defined below) is part of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan (as defined below), which is comprised of five pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $62,500,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the promissory notes comprising the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan. |
(2) | Prior to the open prepayment date of August 6, 2027, the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan can be defeased after the earlier to occur of (a) March 6, 2021 and (b) the first monthly payment date following the end of the two-year period commencing on the closing date of the securitization of the last Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan promissory note (the “Permitted Release Date”). Partial Release is permitted. See “Release of Individual Property” and “Release of Developmental Parcel” below for further discussion of release requirements. |
(3) | See “The Mortgage Loan” and “Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity” below for further discussion of additional debt. |
(4) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
(5) | The decline in NOI from 12/31/2015 to 12/31/2016 is due to the vacating of two tenants, which accounted for approximately 76,000 SF, from the 200 Park Place property. Furthermore, the borrower sponsors continued to vacate expiring tenants at 200 Park Place while renovations were being completed at the building in order to increase rental rates. Subsequently, the recovery of NOI is related to leasing activity following the completion of renovations and capital improvements at the Park Place at Florham Park Property (as defined below) and expiring free rent periods. In 2017, the borrower sponsors signed three new leases with RBC Capital Markets LLC (14.9% of NRA, 16.5% of underwritten base rent), Viner Finance (3.4% of NRA, 3.8% of underwritten base rent) and Normandy FundSub Mgmt Co., LLC (1.8% of NRA, 1.5% of underwritten base rent). |
(6) | Hyman Beck & Company, Inc. leases 2,105 SF in the 210 Park Place property, which has a lease expiration in July 2018. Its space is currently vacant and the tenant is paying all obligations under its lease, however, such space is underwritten as vacant. |
(7) | The appraisal concluded an “as-is” appraised value of $91.2 million. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio presented above are based on the alternate market “as-is” appraised value of the Park Place at Florham Park Property of $96.0 million, as of December 4, 2017, which assumes that outstanding landlord obligations for free rent, tenant improvements, and leasing commissions are fully funded and escrowed by the lender through a title company. At loan origination, landlord obligations of $5,044,401 were escrowed. Based on the “as-is” appraised value of $91.2 million and the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio are 68.5% and 68.5%, respectively. |
The Mortgage Loan. The sixth largest mortgage loan (the “Park Place at Florham Park Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan”) evidenced by five pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $62,500,000. The Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan is secured by a first priority mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee interest in a 354,381 SF Class A suburban office park comprised of four buildings located in Florham Park, New Jersey (the “Park Place at Florham Park Property”). Promissory Notes A-1, A-2 and A-5, with an aggregate original principal balance of $45,00,000, represent the Park Place at Florham Park Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8
A-3-51
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
Trust. Promissory Notes A-3 and A-4, with an aggregate original principal balance of $17,500,000, are currently held by UBS AG, or an affiliate thereof, and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time. The lender provides no assurances that any of the non-securitized notes will not be split further. The Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
Note A-1 | $30,000,000 | $30,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | Yes |
Note A-2 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-3 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | UBS AG | No |
Note A-4 | $7,500,000 | $7,500,000 | UBS AG | No |
Note A-5 | $5,000,000 | $5,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Total | $62,500,000 | $62,500,000 |
The proceeds of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan and a $12,500,000 mezzanine loan (the “Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan”) were used to refinance the Park Place at Florham Park Property, fund reserves, pay closing costs, and return equity to the borrower sponsors.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrower is Advance at Park Place, LLC (the “Park Place at Florham Park Borrower”), a single-purpose Delaware limited liability company structured to be bankruptcy remote with two independent directors. The guarantors and borrower sponsors of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan are Normandy Real Estate Fund, LP and Normandy Real Estate Management, LLC. The Park Place at Florham Park Borrower is indirectly owned by NRE Office Fund Private Limited (28.2%), Normandy Real Estate Fund GP, LLC (0.1%) and other limited partners (71.7%). Normandy Real Estate Fund, LP has been involved in prior deeds in lieu of foreclosure, discounted payoffs and foreclosure proceedings. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings”.
Normandy Real Estate Partners (“Normandy”) is a privately-owned real estate operator and investment manager that targets underperforming office and mixed-use investments in well-located urban and transit-oriented submarkets in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic region. Since 1996, Normandy has invested over $2.7 billion of institutional capital and acquired over 38 million SF of commercial real estate. Its core capabilities include investment management, leasing and asset management, construction and development and property management. Normandy manages a portfolio of over 14 million SF of commercial properties primarily located in the Northeast.
The Property. The Park Place at Florham Park Property is a four-building 354,381 SF Class A office park located in Florham Park, New Jersey, comprised of the 200 Park Place property, 210 Park Place property, 220 Park Place property and 230 Park Place property (each, an “Individual Property”). Situated on 29.9 acres, the Park Place at Florham Park Property was originally built between 1974 and 1976 for Exxon Mobil, gut renovated in 2001 and last renovated in 2015-2016. Amenities at the Park Place at Florham Park Property include a new fitness center with restroom and locker facilities, a newly renovated cafeteria with seating for up to 70, 1,306 parking spaces (approximately 3.69 spaces per 1,000 SF), a shared conference room and a complimentary shuttle service to the Convent Station Train Station, which provides direct access to New York Penn Station. Since its acquisition of the Park Place at Florham Park Property, the borrower sponsors have invested approximately $26.6 million in capital expenditures and soft goods ($75.14 PSF).
Occupancy of the Park Place at Florham Park Property over the last 11 years averages 90.9%. Excluding 2015, which had year-end occupancy of 78.4% due to the borrower sponsors’ strategy of vacating expiring tenants while the 200 Park Place property underwent renovations, the average occupancy over the 11-year period is 92.1%. As of December 6, 2017, the Park Place at Florham Park Property was 94.3% physically occupied and 94.9% leased to 16 tenants. Five tenants, comprising of approximately 46.4% of NRA and 44.3% of underwritten base rent, are investment grade tenants including RBC Capital Markets LLC (Moody’s/S&P: A3/AA-), Santander Bank, N.A. (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P: BBB+/Baa1/BBB+), Manufacturers & Traders Trust (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P: A/A3/A), Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. (Moody’s/S&P: Aa3/A+) and Fairleigh Dickinson University (Fitch: BBB+).
Property Summary | ||||||||
Individual Property | Year Built/ Renovated | Property NRA (SF) | Approximate % of Total SF | Allocated Cut-Off Date Loan Amount | Appraised Value(1) | LTV(1) | UW NCF | UW NCF Debt Yield |
200 Park Place | 1974/2016 | 160,518 | 45.3% | $28,313,000 | $43,400,000 | 65.2% | $2,575,705 | 9.1% |
230 Park Place | 1974/2016 | 67,924 | 19.2% | $14,549,000 | $22,300,000 | 65.2% | $1,359,101 | 9.3% |
220 Park Place | 1974/2015 | 68,116 | 19.2% | $10,504,000 | $16,100,000 | 65.2% | $993,167 | 9.5% |
210 Park Place | 1976/2015 | 57,823 | 16.3% | $9,134,000 | $14,000,000 | 65.2% | $871,826 | 9.5% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 354,381 | 100.0% | $62,500,000 | $96,000,000 | 65.1% | $5,799,800 | 9.3% |
(1) | Total Appraised Value and Wtd. Avg. LTV is based on the consolidated alternate market “as-is” appraised value is $96.0 million, as the Park Place at Florham Park Property is an interconnected corporate park situated upon two municipal lots. Based on the aggregate of the alternate market “as-is” appraised values of the individual Park Place at Florham Park Property buildings of $95,800,000, the LTV of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan is 65.2%. |
A-3-52
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
Major Tenants.
Fairleigh Dickinson University (67,924 SF, 19.2% of NRA, 14.1% of underwritten base rent). Fairleigh Dickinson University (“FDU”) is the largest private university in New Jersey, with academic enrollment of over 12,000 and part-time and full-time faculty of over 1,100. Founded in 1942, FDU offers over 100 undergraduate and graduate degree programs as well as doctoral programs. FDU occupies the entire 230 Park Place property at the Park Place at Florham Park Property, and utilizes its space for its Graduate Pharmacy Program, as part of its Florham Park campus. Fairleigh Dickinson University (Fitch BBB+) has been in occupancy at the Park Place at Florham Park Property since its original lease commencement date of July 1, 2012. It recently extended its lease term through June 30, 2028 and expanded its footprint at the Park Place at Florham Park Property to occupy all of the 230 Park Place property totaling 67,924 SF at an UW base rent rate of $19.50 PSF triple net with annual rent steps of $0.50 PSF. FDU has two five-year renewal options remaining and no termination options.
RBC Capital Markets LLC (52,787 SF, 14.9% of NRA, 16.5% of underwritten base rent). Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) Capital Markets LLC is a global investment bank providing expertise in banking, finance and capital markets to corporations, institutional investors, asset managers and governments around the world. RBC Capital Markets LLC, which occupies the entire second floor of the 200 Park Place property, houses their regional wealth management office as well as several high profile sales positions at the Park Place at Florham Park Property. RBC Capital Markets LLC has an original rent commencement date of February 1, 2017 with a current base rent of $29.50 PSF modified gross, with annual rent steps of $0.50 PSF. RBC Capital Markets LLC’s lease expires on July 31, 2028. The tenant has two five-year renewal options remaining and no termination options.
Schenk Price Smith & King LLP (38,519SF, 10.9% of NRA, 13.0% of underwritten base rent). Founded in 1912, Schenck Price Smith & King LLP (“SPSM”) is a full-service law firm with offices in New Jersey and Manhattan consisting of over 80 lawyers and 26 practice groups. SPSM has been in occupancy at the Park Place at Florham Park Property since March 2010 when it occupied its space via a sublease. SPSM currently occupies three suites within the 220 Park Place property totaling 38,519 SF through August 2022. SPSM pays an UW base rent of $32.00 PSF modified gross on 34,642 SF of its space and $29.50 PSF modified gross on 3,877 SF of its space. SPSM’s lease provides for annual rent steps of $0.50 PSF and two 5-year renewal options remaining and no termination options.
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the Park Place at Florham Park Property:
Tenant Summary(1) | ||||||||
Tenant Name | Individual Property | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/ S&P)(2) | Tenant SF | Approximate
% of SF |
Annual UW Base Rent | % of Total Annual UW Base Rent | Annual
UW Base Rent PSF(3) |
Lease Expiration |
Fairleigh Dickinson University | 230 Park Place | BBB+/NR/NR | 67,924 | 19.2% | $1,324,518 | 14.1% | $19.50 | 6/30/2028 |
RBC Capital Markets LLC | 200 Park Place | NR/A3/AA- | 52,787 | 14.9% | $1,557,217 | 16.5% | $29.50 | 7/31/2028 |
Schenk Price Smith & King LLP | 220 Park Place | NR/NR/NR | 38,519 | 10.9% | $1,222,916 | 13.0% | $31.75 | 8/31/2022 |
Level 3 Communication, LLC(4) | 200 Park Place | BB/Ba3/NR | 34,908 | 9.9% | $1,230,507 | 13.1% | $35.25 | 4/30/2020 |
Santander Bank, N.A.(5) | 200 Park Place | BBB+/Baa1/BBB+ | 30,563 | 8.6% | $901,609 | 9.6% | $29.50 | 10/31/2027 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 224,701 | 63.4% | $6,236,766 | 66.2% | $27.76 | |||
Remaining Tenants(6) | 109,525 | 30.9% | $3,183,647 | 33.8% | $29.07 | |||
Vacant Space(7) | 20,155 | 5.7% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | |||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 354,381 | 100.0% | $9,420,413 | 100.0% | $28.19 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Ratings provided are for the parent company of the entity listed in the “Tenant Name” field whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. Annual UW Base Rent PSF excludes vacant space. |
(4) | Level 3 Communication, LLC subleases its entire space to Armada Healthcare LLC through March 2020 at a sublease rental rate of $16.00 PSF. Level 3 Communication, LLC’s prime lease rate of $35.25 PSF was underwritten. |
(5) | Santander Bank, N.A. has a one-time right to terminate effective as of November 2024, upon notice no later than November 2023 and a termination payment of $1,123,188. |
(6) | Two spaces at the 200 Park Place and 210 Park Place properties totaling 21,733 SF are subleased to two tenants at a weighted average sublease rental rate of $17.65 PSF. The sublessors’ weighted average prime lease rate of $30.14 PSF was underwritten. |
(7) | Hyman Beck & Company, Inc. leases 2,105 SF in the 210 Park Place property, which has a lease expiration in July 2018. Its space is currently vacant and the tenant is paying all obligations under its lease, however, such space is underwritten as vacant. |
A-3-53
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Park Place at Florham Park Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling(3) | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 1 | 6,290 | 1.8% | 1.8% | $22.00 | $138,380 | 1.5% | 1.5% |
2020(4) | 2 | 44,387 | 12.5% | 14.3% | $34.13 | $1,514,877 | 16.1% | 17.5% |
2021(5) | 3 | 38,280 | 10.8% | 25.1% | $30.80 | $1,178,873 | 12.5% | 30.1% |
2022 | 5 | 53,354 | 15.1% | 40.2% | $30.95 | $1,651,272 | 17.5% | 47.6% |
2023 | 1 | 8,472 | 2.4% | 42.5% | $25.00 | $211,800 | 2.2% | 49.8% |
2024 | 3 | 20,213 | 5.7% | 48.3% | $29.00 | $586,177 | 6.2% | 56.1% |
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 48.3% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 56.1% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 48.3% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 56.1% |
2027 | 1 | 30,563 | 8.6% | 56.9% | $29.50 | $901,609 | 9.6% | 65.6% |
2028 | 5 | 132,667 | 37.4% | 94.3% | $24.40 | $3,237,426 | 34.4% | 100.0% |
2029 & Beyond | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 94.3% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant(6) | 0 | 20,155 | 5.7% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 21 | 354,381 | 100.0% | $28.19 | $9,420,413 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease and that are not considered in the lease rollover schedule. |
(3) | Wtd. Avg. UW Base Rent PSF Rolling excludes vacant space. |
(4) | Level 3 Communication, LLC subleases its entire space to Armada Healthcare LLC through March 2020 at a sublease rental rate of $16.00 PSF. Level 3 Communication, LLC’s prime lease rate of $35.25 PSF was underwritten. Sun National Bank subleases its entire space to Points Group, LLC at a sublease rental rate of $17.50 PSF through May 2018, which increases to $18.50 PSF thereafter through the sublease expiration date in May 2020. Sun National Bank’s prime lease rate of $30.00 PSF was underwritten. |
(5) | CCG Holdings, LLC (“Clearview Cinemas”) subleases its entire space to DataMotion, Inc. through August 2021 at a current sublease rental rate of $17.00 PSF with annual rent increases of $0.50 PSF. Clearview Cinemas’ prime lease rate of $30.25 PSF was underwritten. |
(6) | Hyman Beck & Company, Inc. leases 2,105 SF in the 210 Park Place property, which has a lease expiration in July 2018. Its space is currently vacant and the tenant is paying all obligations under its lease, however, such space is underwritten as vacant. |
The Market. The Park Place at Florham Park Property is located in Florham Park, New Jersey, located just off Route 24, a highway connecting Interstates 287 and 78. The Park Place at Florham Park Property also benefits from its close proximity to downtown Morristown, Madison and Florham Park, which include a diverse mix of commercial and retail establishments to serve the needs of nearby residents and office workers, as well as regional and interstate highways. Additionally, the Park Place at Florham Park Property is located approximately 29.5 miles west of New York City and 20.4 miles west of Newark Liberty International Airport.
Development in the area is predominantly of Class A office space primarily for single-tenant/owner-user, hotel, and multifamily uses. The largest proposed redevelopment within the area is the redevelopment of a 147-acre site at the intersection of Park Avenue and Columbia Turnpike, the location of the former Honeywell Corporate Headquarters, into 235 residential townhomes, 715,000 SF of corporate headquarters office space and preservation of approximately 15 acres as open space. The Green at Florham Park is a 268-acre master planned development into single-tenant and multi-tenant occupancy office space, a 256-unit furnished rental corporate suites community, a 161-room Archer boutique hotel, a 120,000 SF Jets training facility, and more.
According to a third party research report, the estimated 2017 population within a three- and five-mile radius of the Park Place at Florham Park Property is 50,317 and 150,471, respectively. The estimated 2017 average household income within a three- and five-mile radius of the Park Place at Florham Park Property is $184,562 and $181,217, respectively, compared to New Jersey’s average household income of $107,672.
The Park Place at Florham Park Property is physically located in the Florham Park submarket, however, the immediate area also encompasses portions of the Morristown office submarket. Within this region, the Route 24 Corridor is defined as one of the most desirable locations for high quality office buildings in Northern New Jersey, according to the appraisal. The Park Place at Florham Park Property is also considered to be located within the Route 24 Corridor, and it directly competes with the higher quality office space along this corridor, which extends from Interstate Route 287 to the west, to Interstate Route 78 to the east. The Route 24 Corridor generally encompasses portions of the towns of Summit, Short Hills, Livingston, Florham Park, Chatham, Madison, and Morristown. According to Costar, there are 55 office properties located along the Route 24 Corridor with net rentable area greater than 55,000 SF. The properties total 9.6 million SF and reported an average asking rental rate of $30.15 PSF as of July 2017. The Route 24 Corridor vacancy rate of 7.0% is below the Florham Park Class A submarket vacancy rate of 15.1%.
The appraisal identified 16 comparable office properties ranging in size from 105,607 SF to 431,495 SF, which are similar in class, quality, tenancy and location to the Park Place at Florham Park Property.
A-3-54
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the directly competitive properties with respect to the Park Place at Florham Park Property:
Comparable Office Properties | ||||||
Property Name / Location | Address | Submarket | Net Rentable Area (SF) | Year Built | Rent PSF ($) | Vacancy Rate (%) |
Park Place at Florham Park Property | 200, 210, 220, 230 Park Place | Florham Park | 354,381(1) | 1974 - 1976 | $28.19(1) | 5.7%(1) |
Park Ave At Morris County | 100 Campus Drive | Florham Park | 392,867 | 1989 | $35.00 - $37.00 | 45.7%(2) |
Park Ave At Morris County | 200 Campus Drive | Florham Park | 203,885 | 1989 | $35.00 - $37.00 | 17.2% |
Park Ave At Morris County | 300 Campus Drive | Florham Park | 106,261 | 1998 | $35.00 - $37.00 | 9.8% |
Park Ave At Morris County | 400 Campus Drive | Florham Park | 181,938 | 1997 | $35.00 - $37.00 | 0.0% |
Park Ave At Morris County | 500 Campus Drive | Florham Park | 185,337 | 1999 | $35.00 - $37.00 | 15.9% |
Park Ave At Morris County | 600 Campus Drive | Florham Park | 105,607 | 1989 | $35.00 - $37.00 | 9.8% |
The Green @ Florham Park | 170-180 Park Avenue | Florham Park | 368,780 | 2012 | $28.50 - $29.50 | 73.0%(2) |
Florham Park Corporate Center | 25 A&B Vreeland Road | Florham Park | 230,000 | 1983 | $21.00 | 20.0% |
Mack Cali Business Campus | 325 Columbia Turnpike | Florham Park | 168,144 | 1987 | $29.00 | 5.4% |
Southgate 435 | 435 South Street | Morristown | 189,000 | 1982 | $29.00 - $32.00 | 0.0% |
Southgate 475 | 475 South Street | Morristown | 210,000 | 1980 | $29.00 - $32.00 | 0.0% |
Lexington Garden/Southgate | 465 South Street | Morristown | 140,581 | 1988 | $29.00 - $32.00 | 0.0% |
Blackberry Corp I | 100 Southgate Parkway | Morristown | 148,790 | 1982 | $29.00 - $32.00 | 29.9% |
Giralda Farms | 3 Giralda Farms | Madison | 141,000 | 1990 | $35.00 | 100.0%(2) |
Giralda Farms | 5 Giralda Farms | Madison | 431,495 | 1992 | $35.00 | 0.0% |
Giralda Farms | 7 Giralda Farms | Madison | 203,182 | 2000 | $35.00 | 43.7%(2) |
Total/Wtd. Avg.(3) | 3,406,867 | $32.55 | 25.3% |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Four properties in the competitive set, which have the highest vacancy rates, are increasing the weighted average vacancy rate due to recent single tenant departures or planned renovations with intentional vacancies: 100 Campus Drive, 7 Giralda Farms and 3 Giralda Farms reflect the vacating of single tenants, 170-180 Park Avenue are planned to undergo a substantial renovation in 2018. Excluding these properties, the competitive set’s weighted average vacancy is 8.0%. |
(3) | Total/Wtd. Avg. excludes the Park Place at Florham Park Property. |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Park Place at Florham Park Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014 | 2015(1) | 2016(1) | 9/30/2017 TTM(1) | UW(1) | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(2) | $8,994,416 | $8,934,810 | $6,517,277 | $7,565,464 | $10,377,901 | $29.28 |
Total Recoveries | $1,010,123 | $990,650 | $654,905 | $1,229,882 | $1,249,446 | $3.53 |
Other Income(3) | $36,326 | $25,733 | $104,069 | $187,922 | $67,130 | $0.19 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | ($407,924) |
($341,310) |
($271,991) |
($1,282,465) |
($848,422) |
($2.39) |
Effective Gross Income | $9,632,941 | $9,609,883 | $7,004,260 | $7,700,803 | $10,846,056 | $30.61 |
Total Operating Expenses | $4,353,741 |
$4,488,167 |
$3,906,279 |
$4,190,109 |
$4,239,641 |
$11.96 |
Net Operating Income | $5,279,200 | $5,121,716 | $3,097,981 | $3,510,694 | $6,606,415 | $18.64 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $133,267 | $0.38 |
TI/LC | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$673,348 |
$1.90 |
Net Cash Flow | $5,279,200 | $5,121,716 | $3,097,981 | $3,510,694 | $5,799,800 | $16.37 |
Occupancy %(4) | 89.4% | 78.4% | 92.2% | 94.3% | 94.3% | |
NOI DSCR(5) | 1.64x | 1.59x | 0.96x | 1.09x | 2.05x | |
NCF DSCR(5) | 1.64x | 1.59x | 0.96x | 1.09x | 1.80x | |
NOI Debt Yield(5) | 8.4% | 8.2% | 5.0% | 5.6% | 10.6% | |
NCF Debt Yield(5) | 8.4% | 8.2% | 5.0% | 5.6% | 9.3% |
(1) | The decline in Net Operating Income from 2015 to 2016 is due to the vacating of two tenants, which accounted for approximately 76,000 SF, from the 200 Park Place property. Furthermore, the borrower sponsors continued to vacate expiring tenants at 200 Park Place while renovations were being completed at the 200 Park Place property in order to increase rental rates. Subsequently, the recovery of Net Operating Income is related to leasing activity following the completion of renovations and capital improvements at the Park Place at Florham Park Property and expiring free rent periods. In 2017, the borrower sponsors signed three new leases with RBC Capital Markets LLC (14.9% of NRA, 16.5% of underwritten base rent), Viner Finance (3.4% of NRA, 3.8% of underwritten base rent) and Normandy FundSub Mgmt Co., LLC (1.8% of NRA, 1.5% of underwritten base rent). |
(2) | UW Gross Potential Rent is based on the underwritten rent roll and includes (i) rent steps through January 2019 of $114,143, (ii) vacancy gross up of $602,545, and (iii) straight line rent of $354,944 associated with investment grade tenants. |
(3) | Other Income includes miscellaneous income and tenant services reimbursement. |
(4) | UW Occupancy % is based on economic vacancy of 7.3%. The appraisal concluded stabilized vacancy and collection loss allowance of 7.0% The Park Place at Florham Park Property was 94.9% leased as of December 6, 2017 and 94.3% physically occupied. |
(5) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan. |
A-3-55
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
Escrows and Reserves. The Park Place at Florham Park Borrower deposited in escrow at loan origination (i) $168,292 for real estate taxes, (ii) $29,273 for insurance premiums, (iii) 37,500 for deferred maintenance and (iv) $5,044,401 for unfunded obligations with respect to outstanding tenant improvements ($3,880,114), leasing commissions ($9,565) and free rent ($1,154,722). The Park Place at Florham Park Borrower is required to escrow monthly (i) 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, (ii) 1/12 of the annual insurance premiums, (iii) $5,906 for capital expenditures, (iv) $44,298 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions, subject to a cap of $2,000,000, and (v) on each monthly payment date commencing in February 2027 through and including the monthly payment date in November 2027, $2,437 for environmental insurance premium coverage.
Lockbox and Cash Management. A hard lockbox is in place with respect to the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan. The Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan has springing cash management during the continuance of a Cash Management Trigger Event (as defined below). During the continuance of a Cash Management Trigger Event, funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept to the cash management account on each business day, to be applied on each monthly payment date to fund the required reserves deposits as described above under “Escrows and Reserves,” to pay debt service on the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan, to pay operating and extraordinary expenses, to pay debt service on the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan, and during the continuance of a Material Tenant Trigger Event (as defined below), to escrow monthly excess cash flow into a Material Tenant Rollover account until the balance of such account equals or exceeds the Material Tenant Rollover Funds Cap (as defined below). Provided no Material Tenant Trigger Event exists and during the continuance of a Cash Sweep Trigger Event (as described below), excess cash flow is required to be swept into an excess cash flow account, or if a Cash Sweep Trigger Event is caused solely by an event of default under the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan, into a mezzanine loan subaccount.
A “Cash Management Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) an event of default, (ii) any bankruptcy action involving the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower, the guarantor, or the affiliated property manager, (iii) the debt service coverage ratio based on the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan falling below 1.50x, (iv) the aggregate debt service coverage ratio based on the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan and the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan falling below 1.10x, (v) a Material Tenant Trigger Event, (vi) any indictment for fraud or misappropriation of funds by the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower, the guarantor, or the affiliated property manager or related officer or director or (vii) event of default under the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan. A Cash Management Trigger Event will continue until, in regard to clause (i) or (vii) above, the cure of such event of default (or the waiver of such default) by the lender, in regard to clause (ii) above, the filing being discharged, stayed or dismissed within 90 days for the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower or the guarantor (or the guarantor has been replaced by a guarantor acceptable to the lender), or within 120 days for the property manager (or the manager has been replaced by a qualified manager), and the lender’s determination that such filing does not materially affect the monetary obligations of the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower, the guarantor, or the property manager, in regard to clause (iii) above, the debt service coverage ratio is at least 1.55x for two consecutive quarters, in regard to clause (iv) above, the aggregate debt service coverage ratio is at least 1.15x for two consecutive quarters, in regard to clause (v) above, a Material Tenant Trigger Event cure, or in regard to clause (vi) above, dismissal of the related indictment for the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower, or replacement of the guarantor or property manager with a replacement guarantor or a qualified manager pursuant to the loan documents.
A “Cash Sweep Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) an event of default, (ii) any bankruptcy action involving the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower, the guarantor, or the affiliated property manager, (iii) the debt service coverage ratio based on the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan falling below 1.50x, (iv) the aggregate debt service coverage ratio based on the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan and the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan falling below 1.10x, or (v) event of default under the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan. A Cash Sweep Trigger Event will continue until, in regard to clause (i) or (v) above, the cure of such event of default (or the waiver of such default) by the lender, in regard to clause (ii) above, the filing being discharged, stayed or dismissed within 90 days for the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower or the guarantor (or the guarantor has been replaced by a guarantor acceptable to the lender), or within 120 days for the property manager (or the manager has been replaced by a qualified manager), and the lender’s determination that such filing does not materially affect the monetary obligations of the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower, the guarantor, or the property manager, in regard to clause (iii) above, the debt service coverage ratio is at least 1.55x for two consecutive quarters, and in regard to clause (iv) above, the aggregate debt service coverage ratio is at least 1.15x for two consecutive quarters.
A “Material Tenant Trigger Event” will occur upon (i) a Material Tenant (as defined below) giving written notice of its intent to terminate, cancel, not extend or not renew its Material Tenant lease, and will continue until, (a) an acceptable Material Tenant lease extension, (b) one or more acceptable Material Tenant space re-tenanting events or (c) the unconditional revocation of all termination and cancellation notices, is accepted by the lender with respect to all or substantially all of such Material Tenant space, (ii) a Material Tenant not extending or renewing its Material Tenant lease on or prior to the date that is the earlier of 12 months prior to the (x) maturity date of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan or (y) the then applicable expiration date under the Material Tenant lease, and will continue until, (a) an acceptable Material Tenant lease extension, (b) one or more acceptable Material Tenant space re-tenanting events or (c) an acceptable new lease scheduled to generate annual rents that are not less than rental rates comparable to existing local market rates for properties similar to the Park Place at Florham Park Property, is accepted by the lender with respect to all or substantially all of such Material Tenant space, (iii) a Material Tenant failing to give notice of its extension or renewal on or prior to the date required under its Material Tenant lease, and will continue until, (a) an acceptable Material Tenant lease extension, (b) one or more acceptable Material Tenant space re-tenanting events or (c) an acceptable new lease scheduled to generate annual rents that are not less than rental rates comparable to existing local market rates for properties similar to the Park Place at Florham Park Property, is accepted by the lender with respect to all or substantially all of such Material Tenant space, (iv) an event of default under a Material Tenant lease beyond any applicable notice and cure period, and will continue until the applicable event of default has been cured, (v) a Material Tenant or lease guarantor of the Material Tenant’s lease becoming insolvent or a debtor in any bankruptcy action, and will continue until the Material Tenant’s lease is unconditionally affirmed in the applicable bankruptcy and the Material Tenant is paying full unabated rent or, if applicable, the guarantor bankruptcy has been discharged or dismissed, (vi) a Material Tenant’s lease being terminated, (vii) a Material Tenant (other than a Material Tenant that is rated “BBB-” or better by rating agencies) “going dark,” vacating, ceasing to occupy or discontinuing its operations at the space demised under the Material Tenant lease, unless all or substantially all of the affected space has been sublet by a subtenant pursuant to a sublease with requirements as specified in the loan agreement, and will continue until (a) the applicable Material Tenant is in actual possession of and utilizing the Material Tenant space and is paying full unabated rent, (b) one or more acceptable Material Tenant space re-tenanting events with respect to all or substantially all of such Material Tenant space or (c) an acceptable new lease scheduled to generate annual rents that are not less than rental rates comparable to existing local market rates for properties similar to the Park Place at Florham Park Property, is accepted by the lender with respect to all or substantially all of such Material Tenant space.
A “Material Tenant Rollover Funds Cap” means an aggregate amount equal to $42.50 PSF of each applicable Material Tenant space relating to any outstanding Material Tenant Trigger Event.
A-3-56
Various Florham Park, NJ 07932
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 6 Park Place at Florham Park
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 65.1% 1.80x 10.6% |
A “Material Tenant” means (i) Fairleigh Dickinson University, (ii) RBC Capital Markets, LLC or (iii) any tenant which, either individually or when taken together with any other lease with the same tenant or an affiliate of such tenant, comprises 15% or more of either (a) the total rentable SF at the Park Place at Florham Park Property or (b) the total in-place base rent at the Park Place at Florham Park Property.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. The Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan is secured by the equity in the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower. The Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan has an original principal balance $12,500,000, accrues interest at a rate of 6.5000%, amortizes over a 120-month term and is coterminous with the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan. Including the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan and the Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan, the cumulative Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, cumulative UW NCF DSCR and cumulative UW NOI Debt Yield are 78.1%, 1.18x and 8.8%, respectively. The Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan lender and Park Place at Florham Park Mezzanine Loan lender have entered into an intercreditor agreement.
Release of Development Parcel. Provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower has the one-time right to obtain the release of one of the unimproved portions of the Park Place at Florham Park Property as identified in the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan documents, provided that, among other things: (i) the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower provides 30 days’ prior notice; (ii) the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower continues to qualify as a single purpose, bankruptcy remote entity; and (iii) the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower enters into reciprocal easements, cross-easements and mutual or non-exclusive easements reasonably necessary for ingress, egress, access, pedestrian walkways, parking, traffic flow, drainage, utilities and services and which agreements limit the uses of the released parcel to retail, residential, for sale residential condominiums or hotel uses.
Release of Individual Property. The Park Place at Florham Park Borrower may defease a portion of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan and release an Individual Property (i) at any time on or after the Permitted Release Date (as defined above) and only in connection with a bona fide sale of an Individual Property to an unaffiliated third party or (ii) in connection with a casualty or condemnation mandatory prepayment affecting an Individual Property, provided that, among other things: (a) no event of default has occurred and is continuing; (b) the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower provides 30 days’ prior notice; (c) the Park Place at Florham Park Borrower defeases a portion of the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan equal to the greater of (x) 120% of the outstanding allocated loan amount of the Individual Property being released and (y) the lender’s share of the net sales proceeds; (d) the debt service coverage ratio for the remaining Individual Properties following the release based on the trailing 12 months is no less than the greater of the debt service coverage ratio immediately preceding such release and 1.75x; (e) the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining Individual Properties is no greater than the lesser of the loan-to-value ratio immediately preceding such release and 65.1%; and (f) the net cash flow debt yield for the remaining Individual Properties is no less than the greater of the net cash flow debt yield immediately preceding such release and 9.0%. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
Terrorism Insurance. The Park Place at Florham Park Borrower is required to obtain insurance against acts of terrorism for loss resulting from perils and acts of terrorism in amounts and with terms and conditions applicable to commercial property, general liability, business income and umbrella liability insurance required pursuant to the Park Place at Florham Park Whole Loan documents.
A-3-57
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
A-3-58
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
A-3-59
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Ladder Capital Finance LLC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance(1): | $45,000,000 | Location: | Oakland, CA | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance(1): | $45,000,000 | General Property Type: | Mixed Use | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 4.3% | Detailed Property Type: | Office/Garage/Retail | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | John Ziegler | Year Built/Renovated: | 1986,1992/ N/A | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.7280% | Size(4): | 246,136 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 1/25/2018 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF(1)(4): | $366 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 3/6/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF(1)(4): | $366 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2028 | Property Manager: | STG Asset Management, Inc. (borrower-related) | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | ||||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | ||||||
Prepayment Provisions(2): | LO (24); DEF (93); O (3) | ||||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/In Place | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Additional Debt Type(1): | Pari Passu | UW NOI(4)(5): | $8,051,219 | ||||
Additional Debt Balance(1): | $45,000,000 | UW NOI Debt Yield(1): | 8.9% | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(1): | 8.9% | ||||
Reserves(3) | UW NCF DSCR(1): | 1.76x | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent NOI(5): | $6,637,378 (12/31/2017) | ||
RE Tax: | $0 | $83,662 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $7,015,772 (12/31/2016) | ||
Insurance: | $54,080 | $9,013 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent NOI: | $5,986,480 (12/31/2015) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | $7,512 | $450,868 | Most Recent Occupancy: | 94.2% (12/31/2017) | ||
Immediate Repairs: | $12,500 | $0 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 97.2% (12/31/2016) | ||
TI/LC: | $2,000,000 | Springing | $2,000,000 | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 90.1% (12/31/2015) | ||
Free Rent Deposit: | $812,214 | $0 | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $181,000,000 (12/20/2017) | ||
Outstanding Free Rent/TIs: | $1,452,227 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1): | 49.7% | ||
Clubsource Litigation | $300,000 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1): | 49.7% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(1): | $90,000,000 | 100.0% | Loan Payoff: | $66,151,802 | 73.5% | |
Reserves: | $4,631,021 | 5.1% | ||||
Closing Costs: | $1,231,662 | 1.4% | ||||
Return of Equity: | $17,985,515 | 20.0% | ||||
Total Sources: | $90,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $90,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | The City Square and Clay Street Mortgage Loan (as defined below) is part of the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan (as defined below), which is comprised of four pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate principal balance of $90,000,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the promissory notes comprising the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan. |
(2) | Prior to the open prepayment date of December 6, 2027, the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan can be defeased after the earlier to occur of (i) March 6, 2022 and (ii) the first monthly payment date following the end of the two-year period commencing on the closing date of the securitization of the last City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan promissory note. The lockout period for defeasance will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the first payment date of March 6, 2018. For the purposes of this term sheet, the assumed lockout period of 24 months is based on the expected UBS 2018-C8 securitization closing date in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
(3) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve information. |
(4) | The Size, Cut-off Date Balance per SF and Maturity Date Balance per SF do not include or take into account, as applicable, the parking garage that includes 1,154 parking stalls. |
(5) | See “Cash Flow Analysis” table. |
The Mortgage Loan. The seventh largest mortgage loan (the “City Square and Clay Street Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan”) evidenced by four pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal balance of $90,000,000. The City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan is secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering four mixed-use buildings totaling 246,136 SF and a 1,154 parking stall garage located in Oakland, California (the “City Square and Clay Street Property”). Promissory Notes A-2 and A-4 with an aggregate original principal balance of $45,000,000, represent the City Square and Clay Street Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. The controlling Promissory Note A-1 and non-controlling Promissory Note A-3, with an aggregate original principal balance of $45,000,000, are currently held by Ladder Capital Finance LLC, or an affiliate thereof, and are expected to be contributed to one of more future securitization transactions or may be otherwise transferred at any time. The lender provides no assurances that the non-securitized notes will not be split further or reissued with reallocated principal amounts. The City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the UBS 2018-C8 Trust until the controlling pari passu Promissory Note A-1 is securitized, whereupon the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan will be serviced pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for such future securitization. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans”, “—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced Pari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
A-3-60
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
Note A-1 | $30,000,000 | $30,000,000 | LCF or an affiliate | Yes |
Note A-2 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Note A-3 | $15,000,000 | $15,000,000 | LCF or an affiliate | No |
Note A-4 | $20,000,000 | $20,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Total | $90,000,000 | $90,000,000 |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrowers are STG City Square, LLC and STG Clay Street, LLC (collectively, the “City Square and Clay Street Borrower”), each a single-purpose Delaware limited liability company, with two independent directors. The borrower sponsor and non-recourse carveout guarantor is John Ziegler, an individual.
John Ziegler is a principal of STG Group (“STG”), which is a value-add real estate developer, owner and operator headquartered in Petaluma, California. Since opening in 1985, STG has owned office, retail and industrial properties across the western US with a focus in northern California. As of January 2018, the portfolio has grown to over 4 million SF of office, retail and industrial properties.
The Property. The City Square and Clay Street Property is a 246,136 SF Class A mixed use building and a 1,154 space parking garage located in Downtown Oakland, California, within the Oakland central business district. The City Square and Clay Street Property consists of three different components: City Square (165,145 SF), Clay Street (80,991 SF), and the 1,154 space parking garage. The City Square and Clay Street Property is located at 500 12th Street & 499, 501 and 525 14th Street and 1200 Clay Street. The improvements on the City Square and Clay Street Property were built in 1986 and 1992, respectively, are situated on a 3.8-acre site and include a 1,154 space subterranean parking garage, which results in a parking ratio of 4.7 spaces per 1,000 SF. The City Square and Clay Street Property consists of 151,304 SF of office space, 38,032 SF of retail space, and a 56,800 SF full service fitness gym. The City Square and Clay Street Property is within the City Center District of Downtown Oakland, which is a multi-block district consisting of office and retail as well as a 489 key Marriott Hotel and the Oakland Convention Center. The subject has access to major East Bay freeway systems and I-980 and I-880 are within one mile of the subject and provide access to other Bay Area cities. The tenant base consists of 35 tenants representing national, regional, and local firms. As of December 31, 2017, the City Square and Clay Street Property was 94.2% leased.
Major Tenants.
Clubsource at City Center (56,800 SF, 23.1% of NRA, 13.1% of underwritten base rent). Clubsource at City Center is one of three clubs that operates under Active Wellness, LLC, founded as a wholly owned subsidiary of Active Acquisition Partners in June 2015. Active Wellness, LLC entered into a joint venture with St. Joseph Health and maintains majority interest. The management company operates the Active Sports Clubs in the San Francisco Bay area, as well as more than 45 corporate, residential, medical and community fitness centers across the country. Clubsource at City Center features an indoor cycling studio, squash courts, a basketball court, an indoor running track, and a pool. Clubsource at City Center has been in occupancy since 1995 and has a lease expiration date of November 2020 with no renewal options and no unilateral termination options. Clubsource at City Center pays $18.18 PSF in base rent, which is significantly below the appraiser’s concluded market rent of $33.00 PSF for its space.
Chevron Federal Credit Union (34,592 SF, 14.1% of NRA; 14.2% of underwritten base rent). Chevron Federal Credit Union is a not-for-profit financial institution that provides a variety of services to its members, including checking & savings accounts, real estate loans, auto and personal loans, and credit cards. Chevron Federal Credit Union (“CFCU”) operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation (S&P/Moody’s: AA-/Aa2), an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Ramon, CA that is engaged in integrated geothermal energy, oil, and natural gas operations. CFCU has over 7,200 CO-OP shared branches and over 85,000 surcharge free ATMs. Chevron Federal Credit Union has been in occupancy since 2012 at the City Square and Clay Street Property with a lease expiration of June 2022 with two five-year extension options and no termination options.
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (16,991 SF, 6.9% of NRA, 10.9% of underwritten base rent). Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (S&P/Fitch: AA-/A+) is an operating subsidiary of Kaiser Permanente Inc., which was founded in 1945 and is one of the nation’s largest not-for-profit health plans, serving 11.7 million members. Kaiser Permanente is headquartered in Oakland, CA, and is comprised of three distinct but independent groups, including Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, and The Permanente Medical Groups. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan executed a new lease in October 2017 at the City Square and Clay Street Property and is expected to take occupancy in March 2018 with a lease expiration of May 2028 and two five-year extension options with no termination options.
Ace Parking Management, Inc. (1,154 Parking Spaces): Ace Parking Management, Inc. (“Ace”) provides a full range of parking services and manages every type of parking application, including office, retail, hotel, airport, stadium, arena and event parking. Managing over 450 locations across the United States and servicing nearly 200,000 customers per day, Ace employs more than 4,500 people and is one of the largest parking companies in the United States.
A-3-61
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the City Square and Clay Street Property:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P)(2) | Tenant SF | Approximate % of SF | Annual UW Base Rent | %
of Total Annual UW Base Rent |
Annual UW Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration |
Parking Tenant | |||||||
Ace Parking Management, Inc. | NR/NR/NR | NAP | NAP | $3,240,000(3) | NAP | NAP | 6/30/2022 |
Commercial Tenants | |||||||
Clubsource at City Center | NR/NR/NR | 56,800 | 23.1% | $1,032,504 | 13.1% | $18.18 | 11/30/2020 |
Chevron Federal Credit Union | NR/Aa2/AA- | 34,592 | 14.1% | $1,117,953 | 14.2% | $32.32 | 6/30/2022 |
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan(4) | A+/NR/AA- | 16,991 | 6.9% | $856,346 | 10.9% | $50.40 | 5/31/2028 |
OpTerra Energy Services, Inc. | A/A2/A- | 16,830 | 6.8% | $674,715 | 8.6% | $40.09 | 12/31/2021 |
Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. | NR/NR/NR | 8,808 | 3.6% | $409,308 | 5.2% | $46.47 | 9/30/2021 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 134,021 | 54.4% | $4,090,826 | 51.9% | $30.52 | ||
Other Tenants | 97,883 | 39.8% | $3,789,510 | 48.1% | $38.71 | ||
Vacant Space | 14,232 | 5.8% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg.(5) | 246,136 | 100.0% | $7,880,336 | 100.0% | $33.98 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease. |
(3) | Base Rent associated with the parking garage was underwritten in Other Income. See “Cash Flow Analysis” table. |
(4) | Kaiser Foundation Health Plan has executed its lease but is not yet in occupancy. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan is expected to take occupancy in March 2018 and commence rental payments in October 2018. |
(5) | Wtd. Avg. Annual UW Base Rent PSF excludes vacant space. Total/Wtd. Avg. excludes Annual U/W Base Rent associated with the parking garage. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the City Square and Clay Street Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling(3) | Total UW Base Rent Rolling(3) | Approx. % of Total Base Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Base Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 3 | 4,116 | 1.7% | 1.7% | $31.20 | $128,401 | 1.6% | 1.6% |
2019 | 4 | 14,814 | 6.0% | 7.7% | $38.23 | $566,390 | 7.2% | 8.8% |
2020 | 10 | 86,902 | 35.3% | 43.0% | $25.76 | $2,238,544 | 28.4% | 37.2% |
2021 | 5 | 39,623 | 16.1% | 59.1% | $39.10 | $1,549,313 | 19.7% | 56.9% |
2022 | 8 | 52,181 | 21.2% | 80.3% | $34.90 | $1,821,345 | 23.1% | 80.0% |
2023 | 1 | 1,030 | 0.4% | 80.7% | $36.00 | $37,080 | 0.5% | 80.5% |
2024 | 1 | 6,432 | 2.6% | 83.3% | $35.16 | $226,149 | 2.9% | 83.3% |
2025 | 1 | 1,500 | 0.6% | 83.9% | $32.92 | $49,380 | 0.6% | 84.0% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 83.9% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 84.0% |
2027 | 1 | 1,572 | 0.6% | 84.6% | $32.67 | $51,357 | 0.7% | 84.6% |
2028 & Beyond | 3 | 23,734 | 9.6% | 94.2% | $0.00 | $1,212,377 | 15.4% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 14,232 | 5.8% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 37 | 246,136 | 100.0% | $33.98 | $7,880,336 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain tenants may have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the subject lease and that are not considered in the lease rollover schedule. |
(3) | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling and Total UW Base Rent Rolling excludes vacant space. |
A-3-62
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
The Market. The City Square and Clay Street Property is located in the Oakland-East Bay metro area. According to the appraisal, significant increases in rents for San Francisco commercial space between 2010 and 2015 has led to a migration of tenants into the Oakland and the emerging East Bay submarkets. The City Square and Clay Street Property is located in Alameda County, which is four miles east of San Francisco. Alameda County had an estimated 2017 population of 1,647,386, which represented an average annual increase of 1.2% year over year since 2010, exceeding the annual growth rate of San Francisco of 1.1%. Between 2006 and 2017, employment in Alameda County increased by 73,780 jobs, which was a 10.7% increase over the same period. The City Square and Clay Street Property is located 5.3 miles from University of California, Berkley, which employs approximately 23,962 people.
The City Square and Clay Street Property is located adjacent to the City Center BART mass transit station on Broadway. Downtown San Francisco’s Embarcadero BART station is two spots and less than a 14-minute transit ride from this stop. The City Center BART station is the 5th busiest BART station in the Bay area. Bus service is also available to San Francisco and East Bay locations, and ferry service to San Francisco is available at Jack London Square, approximately one-mile south of the City Square and Clay Street Property.
According to the appraisal, the City Square and Clay Street Property is located within the Oakland-East Bay Class A submarket. As of the third quarter 2017, the Oakland-East Bay Class A office market consisted of 26,682,000 SF of inventory, with net absorption of 173,000 SF. According to a third party market research report, the estimated 2017 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the City Square and Clay Street Property was 38,030, 246,081, 492,328, respectively, and the 2017 estimated median household income within the same one-, three-, and five-mile radius is $36,192, $55,809, and $60,236, respectively. The Oakland-East Bay Class A office submarket reported a vacancy rate of 8.2%, which has decreased from 9.8% in 2011. Also according to the appraisal, asking office rents averaged $36.51 and have increased 25.3% since 2011.The appraiser concluded a market rent of $51.00 PSF for the office space and $36.00 PSF for the retail space at the City Square and Clay Street Property. As of the December rent roll, the UW base rent at the City Square and Clay Street Property was $33.98 PSF, well below the appraiser’s market rent conclusions.
The following table presents recent leasing data at competitive office buildings with respect to the City Square and Clay Street Property:
Comparable Office Leases | ||||||||
Property Name/Address | Year Built | Size (SF) | Tenant Name | Lease Size (SF) | Lease Date | Lease Term (Yrs.) | Initial Rent/SF |
Lease Type |
City Square and Clay Street 500 12th St. & 499, 501, 525 14th St. and 1200 Clay St. Oakland, CA |
1986 1992 | 246,136(1) | Various(1) | 246,136(1) | Various(1) | Various(1) | $33.98(1) | Various |
Oakland Tower 1111 Broadway Oakland, CA |
1990 | 553,210 | WeWork | 81,452 | January 2018 | 11.5 Yrs. | $52.00 | Full Service |
475 City Center 475 14th St. Oakland, CA |
1983 | 192,926 | Siegel & Yee | 4,086 | September 2017 | 4 Yrs. | $52.80 | Full Service |
Oakland City Center 1333 Broadway Oakland, CA |
1973 | 238,000 | Make a Wish Foundation | 9,409 | August 2017 | 7.8 Yrs. | $51.00 | Full Service |
Oakland Tower 1111 Broadway Oakland, CA |
1990 | 553,210 | GT Nexus | 23,951 | May 2017 | 7 Yrs. | $53.04 | Full Service |
The Rotunda 300 Frank Ogawa Plaza Oakland, CA |
1912 | 242,000 | Bremer Whyte | 6,875 | February 2017 | 5 Yrs. | $48.00 | Full Service |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
A-3-63
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the City Square and Clay Street Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(1) | $5,344,174 | $5,540,677 | $6,784,940 | $6,520,133 | $8,389,628 | $34.09 |
Total Recoveries | $763,590 | $776,815 | $564,080 | $654,530 | $904,119 | $3.67 |
Total Other Income(2) | $3,348,034 | $3,372,051 | $3,366,550 | $3,400,408 | $3,400,408 | $13.82 |
Straight Line Rent | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $207,711 | $0.84 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ($627,546) | ($2.55) |
Percentage Rent | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$6,002 |
$0 |
$0.00 |
Effective Gross Income | $9,455,797 | $9,689,543 | $10,715,569 | $10,581,073 | $12,274,319 | $49.87 |
Total Operating Expenses | $3,565,243 |
$3,703,063 |
$3,699,797 |
$3,943,696 |
$4,223,100 |
$17.16 |
Net Operating Income(3) | $5,890,554 | $5,986,480 | $7,015,772 | $6,637,378 | $8,051,219 | $32.71 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $90,174 | $0.37 |
TI/LC | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$376,332 |
$1.53 |
Net Cash Flow | $5,890,554 | $5,986,480 | $7,015,772 | $6,637,378 | $7,584,713 | $30.82 |
Occupancy %(4) | 85.6% | 90.1% | 97.2% | 94.2% | 93.4%(3) | |
NOI DSCR (5) | 1.37x | 1.39x | 1.63x | 1.54x | 1.87x | |
NCF DSCR (5) | 1.37x | 1.39x | 1.63x | 1.54x | 1.76x | |
NOI Debt Yield(5) | 6.5% | 6.7% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 8.9% | |
NCF Debt Yield(5) | 6.5% | 6.7% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 8.4% |
(1) | UW Gross Potential Rent includes contractual rent steps through September 2018 totaling $133,760. |
(2) | Other Income includes storage income, parking lease income, and other miscellaneous income. |
(3) | Net Operating Income increased from 2017 to UW due to new leasing, tenant expansion, rent steps, and straight line rent. |
(4) | UW Occupancy % is based on underwritten economic vacancy of 6.6%. The City Square and Clay Street Property was 94.2% leased as of December 31, 2017. |
(5) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan. |
Escrows and Reserves. At origination, the City Square and Clay Street Borrower deposited (i) $54,080 into an insurance escrow, (ii) $2,264,441 into a free rent and outstanding TIs escrow, (iii) $2,000,000 into a TI/LC escrow, (iv) $12,500 into a deferred maintenance escrow and (v) $300,000 into an escrow for ongoing litigation. On a monthly basis, the City Square and Clay Street Borrower is required to deposit into the appropriate reserves (i) $83,662 for ongoing taxes, (ii) $9,013 for ongoing insurance premiums, (iii) $7,512 for ongoing capital expenditures, subject to a $450,868 cap and (iv) $30,691 for ongoing TI/LCs if the balance in the TI/LC escrow is below $500,000, subject to a $2,000,000 cap.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and in place cash management. The City Square and Clay Street Borrower is required to send tenant direction letters to all tenants instructing them to deposit all rents and payments directly into the lockbox account controlled by the lender. All funds in the lockbox account are swept daily to a cash management account under the control of the lender and amounts in this account are used to pay monthly debt service payments and any reserves due under the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan documents with any excess amounts remaining in this account returned to the City Square and Clay Street Borrower in accordance with the City Square and Clay Street Whole Loan documents, unless a Cash Sweep Event (as defined below) is continuing.
A “Cash Sweep Event” occurs when (i) an event of default occurs under the loan documents or property management agreement, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio for the City Square and Clay Street Property falls below 1.10x, (iii) Chevron Federal Credit Union and/or Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (each, a “Significant Tenant”) ceases to conduct, or gives notice of intent to cease, its normal business operation at substantially all of its leased premises (iv) any Significant Tenant (or such tenant’s parent, if applicable) becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy, (v) a Significant Tenant terminates or gives notice of its intention to terminate its lease, (vi) it is six months prior to the expiration of a Significant Tenant’s lease or (vii) the lender determines that available litigation funds are insufficient to pay the litigation fund resolution amount.
A Cash Sweep Event will cease upon any of the following: (a) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (i) above, the cure of such default or event of default, (b) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (ii) above, the date on which the Citi Square and Clay Street Property has achieved a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.15x for two consecutive quarters, (c) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (iii) above, the date on which either (x) the applicable tenant has reopened for business at substantially all of its demised premises and paid full unabated rent for two consecutive quarters and delivered an acceptable estoppel certificate or (y) the tenant’s premises has been retenanted under leases acceptable to the lender with rent equal to the lesser of (m) the rent under the prior lease or (n) market rent and an acceptable estoppel certificate for the tenants (either such event, a “Retenanting Event”), (d) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (iv) above, the date on which the applicable tenant or parent becomes solvent to the lender’s satisfaction for two consecutive quarters or is no longer a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding and affirms its lease, (e) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (v) above, the tenant has irrevocably revoked such notice and is open for business at substantially all of the premises, the tenant has paid full, unabated rent for two consecutive quarters and lender has received an acceptable tenant estoppel certificate, (f) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (vi) above, a Retenanting Event has occurred and (g) for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (vii) above, the date on which the lender determines it has received sufficient funds to pay the final resolution of the litigation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for a Cash Sweep Event commencing under item (vi) above, the City Square and Clay Street Borrower may deliver to lender cash or a letter of credit in the amount of $1,500,000, which will postpone the Cash Sweep Event for a period of six months, at which point the underlying Cash Sweep Event will commence (provided, however, that the City Square and Clay Street Borrower may continue to post $1,500,000 for an additional six months of reprieve from the Cash Sweep Event).
A-3-64
500 12th
Street & 499, 501, 525 14th Oakland, CA 94612 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 7 City Square and Clay Street |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$45,000,000 49.7% 1.76x 8.9% |
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Release of Property. Not permitted.
Terrorism Insurance. The City Square and Clay Street Borrower is required to obtain and maintain property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and business income or rental loss insurance that covers perils of terrorism and acts of terrorism, both foreign and domestic.
A-3-65
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
A-3-66
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
A-3-67
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | CIBC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance: | $34,500,000 | Location: | Bloomington, IN 47408 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $34,500,000 | General Property Type: | Multifamily | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 3.3% | Detailed Property Type: | Student Housing | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsors: | Thomas C. Guthrie; Kimberly D. Hendren | Year Built/Renovated: | 1930-2002/2016 | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.6900% | Size: | 342 Units | ||||
Note Date: | 8/8/2017 | Cut-off Date Balance per Unit: | $100,877 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 10/1/2017 | Maturity Date Balance per Unit: | $100,877 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 9/1/2027 | Property Manager: |
Varsity Properties Management Corp. (borrower-related) | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Seasoning: | 5 months | UW NOI: | $3,296,594 | ||||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (29); DEF (84); O (7) | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 9.6% | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Soft/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 9.6% | ||||
Additional Debt Type: | Mezzanine | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.95x | ||||
Additional Debt Balance: | $5,000,000 | Most Recent NOI(2): | $3,163,306 (TTM 11/30/2017) | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 2nd Most Recent NOI(2): | $2,637,021 (12/31/2016) | ||||
Reserves(1) | 3rd Most Recent NOI(2): | $2,553,130 (12/31/2015) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent Occupancy: | 99.7% (11/30/2017) | ||
RE Tax: | $279,206 | $55,841 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy(2): | 99.7% (12/31/2016) | ||
Insurance: | $102,545 | $15,070 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy(2): | 100.0% (12/31/2015) | ||
Immediate Repairs: | $100,000 | $0 | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $58,700,000 (6/1/2017) | ||
Replacements: | $500,000 | Springing | $500,000 | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 58.8% | ||
Other: | $451,250 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 58.8% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $34,500,000 | 87.3% | Loan Payoff: | $27,959,729 | 70.8% | |
Mezzanine Loan: | $5,000,000 | 12.7% | Reserves: | $1,433,002 | 3.6% | |
Closing Costs: | $748,749 | 1.9% | ||||
Return of Equity: | $9,358,520 | 23.7% | ||||
Total Sources: | $39,500,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $39,500,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
(2) | From 2016 to 2017, 56 units were added to the University Properties Portfolio Property. |
The Mortgage Loan. The eighth largest mortgage loan (the “University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a promissory note with an original principal amount of $34,500,000 secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering a portfolio of six student housing properties with 68 buildings totaling 342 units (the “University Properties Portfolio Property”) located in Bloomington, Indiana, the home of Indiana University Bloomington (“IU”). The proceeds of the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan along with the proceeds of a $5 million mezzanine loan (the “University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan”) were primarily used to: (i) refinance a prior mortgage loan of approximately $19.2 million which encumbered a 269-unit portion of the University Properties Portfolio Property and was included in the MSC 2007-IQ16 securitization trust, (ii) refinance approximately $6.8 million of prior mortgage loans made in connection with the acquisition of additional units, (iii) refinance approximately $1.5 million of existing mezzanine debt, (iv) repay approximately $0.5 million of intercompany debt, (v) pay closing costs, (vi) fund upfront reserves and (vii) return equity to the University Properties Portfolio Borrower (as defined below).
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrower is University Properties III LLC (the “University Properties Portfolio Borrower”), a single-purpose Delaware limited liability company structured to be bankruptcy remote with one independent director. The borrower sponsors and non-recourse carve-out guarantors are Thomas C. Guthrie and Kimberly D. Hendren. Mr. Guthrie indirectly owns 21.0% of the University Properties Portfolio Borrower and is majority owner and president of Varsity Properties Management Corp., which has been the property manager of the University Properties Portfolio Property since 2003. Ms. Hendren indirectly owns 50.5% of the University Properties Portfolio Borrower and is also the founder and CEO of CC Holdings, Inc., an owner and operator of 25 restaurants in Indianapolis, Indiana and Cincinnati, Ohio.
The Property. The University Properties Portfolio Property consists of a combination of multi-level apartment complexes, two- and three-story townhomes, and single family homes located on a non-contiguous 25.5-acre site concentrated on the north end of IU’s campus, adjacent to or in close proximity to IU’s recently renovated football stadium and basketball arena and new baseball stadium. The University Properties Portfolio Property is located within walking distance to the center of IU’s campus, approximately one mile to the south, and directly across the street or within 2 blocks from IU’s shuttle station at the football stadium which services two of the IU’s four bus routes. The University Properties Portfolio Property includes:
A-3-68
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
Stadium Crossing – Built between 1985 and 1987, the Stadium Crossing property consists of 201 condominium units (649 beds) situated on 15.0 acres with 504 parking spaces. There are a total of 226 condominium units at the Stadium Crossing property; however, 25 units are not owned by the University Properties Portfolio Borrower. The Stadium Crossing property is governed by the Varsity Villas Homeowner’s Association (“VVHOA”) which is controlled and managed by one of the borrower sponsors, Thomas Guthrie. VVHOA provides for all repairs, maintenance and security services on behalf of the condominium owners, which is covered by the VVHOA fees of $100/unit per month. The Stadium Crossing property’s unit mix consists of: seven 2-bed/2-bath townhome units averaging 910 SF; 34 3-bed/3-bath flat units averaging 1,100 SF; 107 3-bed/3-bath townhome units averaging 1,365 SF; and 53 4-bed/4-bath units averaging 1,598 SF. The buildings include porches and/or decks and patios, and all units feature in-unit washer/dryer. Stadium Crossing is 100.0% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll.
Varsity Court – Built in 1991, the Varsity Court property is comprised of six two-story plus basement wood frame buildings containing 56 units (141 beds) situated on 4.0 acres with 134 parking spaces. The Varsity Court property’s unit mix consists of: two 1-bed/1-bath flat units averaging 546 SF; 23 2-bed/2-bath townhouse units averaging 1,091 SF; and 31 3-bed/3-bath townhouse units average 1,597 SF. The buildings include porches and/or decks and patios, and all units feature in-unit washer/dryer. The Varsity Court property is 100% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll.
Cedar Creek – Built in 1952 and 1988, the Cedar Creek property is comprised of seven two-story wood frame buildings containing 41 units (84 beds) situated on 2.5 acres with 76 parking spaces. The Cedar Creek property’s unit mix consists of: one 1-bed/1.5-bath unit totaling 545 SF; four 2-bed/1-bath units averaging 1,280 SF; 34 2-bed/1.5-bath averaging 1,024 SF; one 3-bed/2-bath unit totaling 1,774 SF; and one 4-bed/2-bath unit totaling 2,366 SF. The buildings include porches and decks, and all units feature in-unit washer/dryer. The Cedar Creek property also features a swimming pool and the University Properties Portfolio Property management office. The Cedar Creek property is 100% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll.
University Village – Built between 1930 and 2002, the University Village property is comprised of 16 detached, two- and three-story buildings containing 23 units (109 beds) situated on 3.2 acres with 134 parking spaces, including 16 garage spaces. The property’s unit mix includes: one 3-bed/1-bath unit totaling 800 SF; four 4-bed/2-bath units averaging 1,425 SF; four 5-bed/2-bath units averaging 1,707 SF; six 5-bed/2.5-bath units averaging 1,566 SF; and eight 5-bed/3-bath units averaging 1,704 SF. The buildings include balconies/patios, parking driveways, and all units feature in-unit washer/dryer. The University Village property is 95.7% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll.
Varsity Gate – Built in 1991, the Varsity Gate property consists of a two-story wood frame building containing 13 units (15 beds) situated on 0.7 acres with 19 parking spaces. The property’s unit mix includes: 11 1-bed/1-bath units averaging 412 SF; one 2-bed/1.5 bath unit with 787 SF and one 2-bed/1-bath unit with 787 SF. The building includes a common laundry room on the ground floor. Varsity Gate is 100% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll.
Campus Apartments – Built in 1970, the Campus Apartments property consists of a two-story wood frame building containing eight 1-bed/1-bath units averaging 300 SF (8 beds) situated on 0.20 acres with 10 parking spaces. The Campus Apartments property is 100% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll.
Stadium Crossing, Varsity Court, Cedar Creek, and Varsity Gate share adjacent borders along North Dunn Street, between East 20th Street and East State Road 45. University Village is situated approximately 0.2 miles south from the other four properties and Campus Apartments is approximately 0.4 miles south from the other four properties. The University Properties Portfolio Property is leased on an un-furnished, per unit basis. The University Properties Portfolio Property is 99.7% leased as of the November 8, 2017 rent roll, and all leases are for 12-month periods with the exception of 19 units that leased on a per-semester basis and 3 units on a 10-month lease period.
The University Properties Portfolio Borrower amassed the University Properties Portfolio Property over time through a series of acquisitions. The 269-unit/775-bed portion of the University Properties Portfolio Property that was previously securitized was acquired between 2003 and 2007 with a cost basis of approximately $27.5 million ($26.2 million total acquisition cost and $1.3 million of capital expenditures through 2007 for a total of $102,295/unit). One of the original units was converted into a management office. Such portion of the University Properties Portfolio Property has consistently been over 98% occupied over the last 10 years. The University Properties Portfolio Borrower subsequently acquired an additional 18 units at Stadium Crossing in 2013 for approximately $2.0 million ($109,910/unit) and an additional 56 units at Stadium Crossing from 2016 through 2017 for approximately $5.5 million ($97,768/unit). These additional units have also been over 98% occupied since acquisition. The University Properties Portfolio Borrower has invested a total of approximately $3.8 million in capital expenditures into the University Properties Portfolio Property and the total cost basis is approximately $37.4 million.
The University Properties Portfolio Property’s unit mix includes 22 one-bedroom units averaging 390 SF, 70 two-bedroom units averaging 1,042 SF, 174 three-bedroom units averaging 1,354 SF, 58 four-bedroom units averaging 1,599 SF, and 18 five-bedroom units averaging 1,659 SF. The table below shows the apartment mix at the University Properties Portfolio Property:
University Properties Portfolio Property Unit Mix Summary(1) | ||||||
Unit Type | No. of Units | % of Total Units | Avg. Unit Size (SF) | No. of Occupied Units | Occupancy (%) | Avg. In Place Monthly Rent Per Unit |
1-bedroom | 22 | 6.4% | 390 | 22 | 100.0% | $564 |
2-bedrooms | 70 | 20.5% | 1,042 | 70 | 100.0% | $929 |
3-bedrooms | 174 | 50.9% | 1,354 | 174 | 100.0% | $1,211 |
4-bedrooms | 58 | 17.0% | 1,599 | 58 | 100.0% | $1,610 |
5-bedrooms | 18 | 5.3% | 1,659 | 17 | 94.4% | $2,578 |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 342 | 100.0% | 1,286 | 341 | 99.7% | $1,247 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
The Market. The University Properties Portfolio Property is located in Bloomington, Indiana, within walking distance to the center of the IU campus, approximately one mile to the south, and directly across the street or within 2-blocks from IU’s recently renovated football stadium, basketball arena and baseball stadium as well as the shuttle station at the football stadium which services two of the IU’s four bus routes.
A-3-69
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
Founded in 1838, IU is the principal campus of the Indiana University System. IU is the tenth largest university in the United States and is one of the fourteen schools in the Big Ten intercollegiate athletic conference. According to the appraisal, IU has received various accolades for its academic achievement and campus life. IU had a fall 2017 full-time enrollment of 43,762 students, representing a 3.9% increase from fall 2012. IU has over 750 student organizations, over 300 overseas study programs and over 200 research centers and institutes, in addition to more than 200 undergraduate majors and more than 550 academic programs. IU has the capacity to accommodate approximately 12,559 students (approximately 29% of the fall 2017 enrollment) in their residential halls, including the newly renovated and repurposed Wells Quadrangle which re-opened for the 2017/2018 school year. In addition, sororities and fraternities have approximately 8,200 members (approximately 19% of the fall 2017 enrollment) the majority of which are housed by their organization. As a result, IU relies on privately owned, off-campus housing to accommodate the rest of its student population.
According to the appraisal, the estimated 2016 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius was 17,487, 67,741, and 112,147, respectively. The 2016 estimated average household income within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius was $32,574, $51,544, and $62,143, respectively.
The appraisal identified two student housing properties slated to open in the summer of 2018, Ethos (480 beds) and Evolve (746 beds). Ethos and Evolve are located approximately 2.3-miles and 0.9-miles, respectively, from the center of IU’s campus. Evolve is located in close proximity to the University Properties Portfolio Property and was developed on a site that was previously improved with 328 beds. Evolve and Ethos are marketed as luxury student housing leased by the bed. Asking monthly rents per bed at Ethos and Evolve range from $640 to $1,019 and $799 to $1,229, respectively, depending on the floorplan. The average monthly rent per bed at the University Properties Portfolio Property is approximately $425.
According to a third party market research report, as of the third quarter of 2017, the Bloomington metro apartment market had an average vacancy rate of 5.3% and average asking monthly rent of $787 per unit, an increase of 3.4% year over year. The appraiser surveyed six comparable rental properties in the market and concluded that the in-place rent at the University Properties Portfolio Property is in-line with market rates.
Comparable rental properties to the University Properties Portfolio Property are shown in the table below:
University Properties Portfolio Property Comparable Rentals Summary | |||||||
Address City, State |
Year Built | Vacancy | Distance to center of IU campus | Number of Units | Unit Type | Avg. Unit Size (SF) | Avg. Monthly Rent per Unit |
University Properties Portfolio Property(1) 2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN |
1930-2002 | 0.3% | 1.1 miles | 342 | One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms Four Bedrooms Five Bedrooms |
390 1,042 1,354 1,599 1,659 |
$564 $929 $1,211 $1,610 $2,578 |
The Arch 703 West Gourley Pike Bloomington, IN |
1982 | 10.1% | 1.6 miles | 208 | Studio One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms |
425 706 887 1,345 |
$560 $630 $692 $830 |
Terra Trace 321 East 14th Street Bloomington, IN |
1973 | 1.8% | 0.9 miles | 114 | One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Four Bedrooms |
690 950 1400 |
$696 $854 $1,874 |
Covenanter Hill Apartments 3101 East Covenanter Drive Bloomington, IN |
1985 | 3.3% | 1.7 miles | 184 | One Bedroom Two Bedrooms |
545 1,159 |
$802 $1,011 |
Regency Court 1616 South Henderson Bloomington, IN |
2001 | 4.6% | 1.9 miles | 108 | One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms Four Bedrooms Five Bedrooms |
648 1,100 1,842 2,250 2,572 |
$772 $1,109 $1,481 $1,460 $2,107 |
The Dillon 525 South Patterson Drive Bloomington, IN |
2014 | 11.3% | 2.2 miles | 204 | One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Four Bedrooms Five Bedrooms |
475 949 1,428 1,728 |
$920 $1,382 $2,312 $2,756 |
The Village at Muller Park 500 South Muller Parkway Bloomington, IN |
2008 | 8.5% | 3.0 miles | 248 | One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms Four Bedrooms |
608 1,161 1,317 1,631 |
$877 $1,237 $1,494 $2,032 |
Source: Appraisal
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll. |
A-3-70
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical and forecasted operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the University Properties Portfolio Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014(1) | 2015(1) | 2016(1) | TTM 11/30/2017(1) | UW | UW Per Unit | |
Gross Potential Rent(2) | $3,716,353 | $3,850,460 | $4,095,274 | $4,800,761 | $5,134,748 | $15,014 |
Less Vacancy & Concessions(3) | ($15,228) | ($48,905) | ($29,445) | ($23,140) | ($256,737) | ($751) |
Other Income(4) | $322,646 |
$294,403 |
$308,003 |
$324,208 |
$324,208 |
$948 |
Effective Gross Income | $4,023,771 | $4,095,958 | $4,373,833 | $5,101,829 | $5,202,218 | $15,211 |
Total Operating Expenses | $1,668,119 |
$1,542,828 |
$1,736,813 |
$1,938,523 |
$1,905,624 |
$5,572 |
Net Operating Income | $2,355,651 | $2,553,130 | $2,637,021 | $3,163,306 | $3,296,594 | $9,639 |
Capital Expenditures | $35,453 |
$31,356 |
$44,291 |
$79,741 |
$100,600 |
$294 |
Net Cash Flow | $2,320,198 | $2,521,774 | $2,592,730 | $3,083,565 | $3,195,994 | $9,345 |
Occupancy % | 99.6% | 100.0% | 99.7% | 99.7% | 95.0% | |
NOI DSCR | 1.44x | 1.56x | 1.61x | 1.93x | 2.01x | |
NCF DSCR | 1.41x | 1.54x | 1.58x | 1.88x | 1.95x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 6.8% | 7.4% | 7.6% | 9.2% | 9.6% | |
NCF Debt Yield | 6.7% | 7.3% | 7.5% | 8.9% | 9.3% |
(1) | From 2016-2017, 56 units were added to the University Properties Portfolio Property. |
(2) | Underwritten Gross Potential Rent is based the November 8, 2017 rent roll, which reflects physical occupancy of 99.7% and includes gross up of 1 vacant unit based on average in-place rents. |
(3) | Underwritten Vacancy & Concessions is based on a 5% underwritten vacancy rate. |
(4) | Underwritten Other Income consists of security deposit income, homeowner’s association income and other miscellaneous items. |
Escrows and Reserves. At loan origination, the University Properties Portfolio Borrower deposited $279,206 in escrow for annual real estate taxes, $102,545 in escrow for annual insurance premiums, $100,000 into a reserve for immediate repairs and $500,000 into a reserve for replacement reserves. The University Properties Portfolio Borrower is required to escrow monthly 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments and 1/12 of the annual estimated insurance premiums. In the event that the balance in the replacement reserve falls below $500,000, the University Properties Portfolio Borrower is required to make monthly deposits of $8,383 for replacement reserves, subject to a $500,000 cap. At loan origination, the University Properties Portfolio Borrower deposited $451,250 into a reserve for the installation of a radon mitigation system and is required (i) to deliver to the lender evidence acceptable to the lender and its environmental consultant that the radon mitigation system is in good working order and continues to be effective in remediating radon concentrations in each building to be at or below 4.0 pCi/L and (ii) implement an operations and maintenance program relating to radon in each building.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan is structured with a soft lockbox and springing cash management. The University Properties Portfolio Borrower or property manager is required to deposit all rents and profits into the lockbox within one business day after receipt thereof. Absent the existence of a Cash Management Period (as defined below), available funds that are on deposit in the lockbox will be transferred to an operating account under the exclusive dominion and control of the University Properties Portfolio Borrower. During the existence of a Cash Management Period, all transfers from the lockbox to the operating account will cease and funds in the lockbox account are required to be applied on each monthly payment date (i) to fund the required real estate tax and insurance reserves deposits, (ii) to pay debt service on the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan, (iii) to pay any other amounts due under the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, (iv) to fund the required deposits into the replacement reserve, (v) to pay operating expenses not otherwise paid or reserved for as described above under “Escrows and Reserves” and referenced in the annual budget approved by the lender together with other amounts incurred by the University Properties Portfolio Borrower in connection with the operation and maintenance of the University Properties Portfolio Property, (vi) provided no event of default is continuing, to pay the monthly payment of interest due under the University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan to the mezzanine lender and (vii) to disburse the remainder to a cash collateral account to be held by the lender as additional security for the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan.
A “Cash Management Period” will commence (i) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents and will continue until the event of default has been cured and such cure has been accepted by the lender; (ii) if the debt service coverage ratio (calculated based on a 30 year amortization schedule) is less than 1.10x for three consecutive calendar months and will continue until the debt service coverage ratio (calculated based on a 30 year amortization schedule) is at least 1.10x for four consecutive calendar quarters; or (iii) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan documents and will continue until the repayment in full of the University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. The University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan is secured by the membership interests in the University Properties Portfolio Borrower pledged by the direct members of the University Properties Portfolio Borrower. The University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan has an outstanding principal balance of $5.0 million, has an interest-only coupon of 11.75% throughout the full term, and is coterminous with the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan. Including the University Properties Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the University Properties Portfolio Mezzanine Loan, the cumulative Cut-off Date LTV, cumulative UW NCF DSCR and cumulative UW NOI Debt Yield are 67.3%, 1.43x and 8.3%, respectively. The lender and the mezzanine lender have entered into an intercreditor agreement.
Release of Property. Not permitted.
Environmental Matters. The Phase I environmental report dated July 27, 2017 reported that the University Properties Portfolio Property is located in EPA designated Radon Zone 1, in which the average predicted radon concentration levels are expected to be at or above the EPA residential action level of 4.0 pCi/L. Several rounds of radon testing were conducted on the ground floor units of each of the buildings at the University Properties Portfolio
A-3-71
2015 North Dunn Street Bloomington, IN 47408 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 8 University Properties Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$34,500,000 58.8% 1.95x 9.6% |
Property, and samples collected from 73 of those units indicated radon concentrations above 4.0 pCi/L. Based on the testing results and the recommendation in the ESA, the installation and activation of a radon mitigation system was required in each building located at the University Properties Portfolio Property in which elevated concentrations of radon was identified in the ESA. At loan origination, the University Properties Portfolio Borrower deposited $451,250 into a reserve, which equals 125% of the estimated cost of such mitigation system. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations”.
Terrorism Insurance. The University Properties Portfolio Borrower is required to obtain and maintain property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and business income or rental loss insurance that covers perils of terrorism and acts of terrorism, both foreign and domestic.
A-3-72
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-73
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
A-3-74
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
A-3-75
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Barclays Bank PLC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Portfolio | |||||
Original Balance: | $33,400,000 | Location(1): | Various | |||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $33,400,000 | General Property Type(1): | Various | |||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 3.2% | Detailed Property Type(1): | Various | |||||
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee | |||||
Borrower Sponsor: |
American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. |
Year Built/Renovated(1): | Various | |||||
Size: | 459,230 SF | |||||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.0660% | Cut-off Date Balance per SF: | $73 | |||||
Note Date: | 12/27/2017 | Maturity Date Balance per SF: | $73 | |||||
First Payment Date: | 2/6/2018 | Property Manager: |
American Finance Properties, LLC (borrower-related) | |||||
Maturity Date: | 1/6/2028 | |||||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | |||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | |||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | ||||||
Seasoning: | 1 month | UW NOI: | $4,150,930 | |||||
Prepayment Provisions: | YM1(25);DEF/YM1(91);O(4) | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 12.4% | |||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 12.4% | |||||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 2.81x | |||||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | |||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 2nd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | |||||
Reserves(2) | 3rd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent Occupancy: | 100.0% (2/1/2018) | |||
RE Tax: | $113,903 | Springing | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | N/A | |||
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | N/A | |||
Replacements: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $62,515,000 (Various) | |||
TI/LC: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 53.4% | |||
Deferred Maintenance: | $33,402 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 53.4% | |||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $33,400,000 | 53.8% | Purchase Price(3): | $60,680,951 | 97.7% | |
Borrower Equity: | $28,680,645 | 46.2% | Closing Costs: | $1,252,389 | 2.0% | |
Reserves: | $147,305 | 0.2% | ||||
Total Sources: | $62,080,646 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $62,080,646 | 100.0% |
(1) | See “The Properties” below for further discussion of property information. |
(2) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
(3) | The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties (as defined below) were acquired by the borrower sponsor between March 31, 2017 and November 7, 2017. According to the borrower sponsor, the sellers of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties did not provide historical operating statements to the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers (as defined below) so historical cash flows and historical occupancy is unavailable. |
The Mortgage Loan. The ninth largest mortgage loan (the “AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a single promissory note with an original principal balance of $33,400,000 and is secured by first priority fee mortgages and deeds of trust encumbering 22 cross-collateralized, single-tenant industrial and retail properties located in twelve states (collectively, the “AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties”). The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan was originated on December 27, 2017 by Barclays Bank PLC. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan accrues interest at an interest rate of 4.0660% per annum. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan had an initial term of 120 months, has a remaining term of 119 months as of the Cut-off Date and requires payments of interest-only through the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan term. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan matures on January 6, 2028. The proceeds of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan were used to recapitalize the borrower sponsor after the purchase the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties between March 31, 2017 and November 7, 2017, fund reserves, and pay closing costs.
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrowers are all single-purpose Delaware limited liability companies structured to be bankruptcy remote with one independent director, as follows: ARG DGGDDNY001, LLC; ARG DGUTCNY001, LLC; ARG DGDWTNY001, LLC; ARG DGFRMNY001, LLC; ARG DGPRSNY001, LLC; ARG DGOTGNY001, LLC; ARG DGKNGNY001, LLC; ARG DGKRHNY001, LLC; ARG TSFLDSD001, LLC; ARG TSHZNND001, LLC; ARG JAFPTIL001, LLC; ARG CHMCPIL001, LLC; ARG CHMCHIL001, LLC; ARG SNRBRAL001, LLC; ARG SNTSCAL001, LLC; ARG FEBRNMN001, LLC; ARG FECSPWY001, LLC; ARG FERLLMO001, LLC; ARG BHCLMSC001, LLC; ARG BHELKNV001, LLC; ARG BHJCKFL001, LLC; and ARG BHSLPLA001, LLC. (collectively, the “AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers”). The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers are 100.0% owned by the borrower sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor, American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. American Finance Trust, Inc. (“AFIN”) owns 100% of the general partnership interests in American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P.
A-3-76
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
AFIN is a public non-traded real estate investment trust that acquires and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial properties, which are net leased primarily to investment grade and national tenants, as well as a portfolio of stabilized core retail properties consisting primarily of power centers and lifestyle centers. As of the second quarter 2017, the borrower sponsor had a portfolio of 516 properties totaling approximately 19.2 million SF. AFIN is externally managed by AR Global Investments, LLC, which has raised and invested over $30.0 billion in capital, served over 150,000 shareholders, and has grown to become one of the largest external managers of direct investment programs in the United States. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation and Other Considerations”.
The Properties. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties are comprised of 22 cross-collateralized single-tenant properties, totaling 459,230 SF across twelve states. Seven of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties are industrial properties, representing approximately 50.5% of the Cut-Off Date allocated loan amount and 50.6% of net operating income, and 15 of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties are retail properties, representing approximately 49.5% of the Cut-Off Date allocated loan amount and 49.4% of net operating income. Built between 1992 and 2017, the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties range in size from 1,256 SF to 141,582 SF. The borrower sponsor acquired the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties between March 31, 2017 and November 7, 2017 for a combined purchase price of approximately $60.7 million. As of February 1, 2018, the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties were 100.0% occupied.
The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties are 100.0% occupied by seven tenants at 22 different locations including nationally recognized tenants, such as Dollar General, FedEx Ground, Bridgestone HOSEpower, Tractor Supply and Sonic. Investment grade tenants, including FedEx Ground (a subsidiary of FedEx Corporation), Bridgestone HOSEpower and Dollar General, occupy 15 of the 22 properties, representing 81.7% of NRA and 69.9% of underwritten base rent. The largest property, FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO, comprises approximately 141,582 SF (30.8% of the total net rentable area) and $780,495 of the underwritten base rent (18.1% of underwritten base rent) and is utilized as industrial space. Other than FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO, no individual property accounts for more than 11.7% of NRA and 7.8% of the underwritten base rent. Each individual lease is either direct with the parent company or guaranteed by the parent company, with the exception of the Chili’s and Sonic locations, which operate as franchises, and FedEx Ground which is a subsidiary of FedEx Corporation. All leases are NNN and the average remaining lease term for the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties is approximately 11.0 years.
The following table presents certain information relating to the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties:
Property Summary(1)(2) | |||||||
Property Name | Property Type | Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount |
% of Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount |
Underwritten NOI | Year Built/ Renovated | Tenant SF | Appraised Value |
FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | Industrial | $6,403,768 | 19.2% | $733,449 | 2017/N/A | 141,582 | $12,000,000 |
Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | Retail | $2,543,134 | 7.6% | $309,705 | 2003/N/A | 6,039 | $4,760,000 |
FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | Industrial | $2,511,077 | 7.5% | $317,263 | 2016/N/A | 53,739 | $4,700,000 |
FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | Industrial | $2,404,223 | 7.2% | $277,063 | 2017/N/A | 29,246 | $4,500,000 |
Chili’s - McHenry, IL | Retail | $2,158,458 | 6.5% | $255,113 | 2002/N/A | 6,039 | $4,040,000 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | Industrial | $1,736,383 | 5.2% | $245,413 | 2016/N/A | 20,900 | $3,250,000 |
Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | Retail | $1,607,702 | 4.8% | $179,500 | 1992/2013 | 1,256 | $3,000,000 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | Industrial | $1,375,750 | 4.1% | $192,795 | 1999/N/A | 19,979 | $2,575,000 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | Industrial | $1,228,825 | 3.7% | $168,304 | 2008/N/A | 25,125 | $2,300,000 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | Industrial | $1,191,426 | 3.6% | $166,362 | 2016/N/A | 12,000 | $2,230,000 |
Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | Retail | $1,175,398 | 3.5% | $145,250 | 2014/N/A | 18,000 | $2,200,000 |
Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | Retail | $1,057,858 | 3.2% | $136,127 | 2008/N/A | 25,612 | $1,980,000 |
Dollar General - Kingston, NY | Retail | $886,891 | 2.7% | $116,291 | 2014/N/A | 9,100 | $1,660,000 |
Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | Retail | $857,441 | 2.6% | $101,667 | 2001/N/A | 1,621 | $1,600,000 |
Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | Retail | $849,492 | 2.5% | $109,379 | 2008/N/A | 25,612 | $1,590,000 |
Dollar General - Farmington, NY | Retail | $838,807 | 2.5% | $110,102 | 2014/N/A | 9,100 | $1,570,000 |
Dollar General - Otego, NY | Retail | $806,750 | 2.4% | $105,385 | 2014/N/A | 9,026 | $1,510,000 |
Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | Retail | $796,065 | 2.4% | $104,360 | 2015/N/A | 9,100 | $1,490,000 |
Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | Retail | $764,009 | 2.3% | $100,193 | 2014/N/A | 9,002 | $1,430,000 |
Dollar General - Utica, NY | Retail | $747,980 | 2.2% | $91,923 | 2013/N/A | 9,100 | $1,400,000 |
Dollar General - Parish, NY | Retail | $747,980 | 2.2% | $92,302 | 2013/N/A | 9,026 | $1,400,000 |
Dollar General - Geddes, NY | Retail | $710,581 | 2.1% | $92,984 | 2014/N/A | 9,026 | $1,330,000 |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | $33,400,000 | 100.0% | $4,150,930 | 459,230 | $62,515,000 |
(1) | The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties comprise 22 single tenant retail and industrial properties, each 100.0% occupied. |
(2) | Tenant Sales are unavailable with the exception of Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL which reports annual sales of $4,200,000 ($695.48 per square foot), Chili’s - McHenry, IL which reports annual sales of $2,800,000 ($463.65 PSF), Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL which reports sales of $2,364,250 ($1,882.37 PSF) and Sonic - Robertsdale, AL which reports sales of $1,270,838 ($783.98 PSF). |
A-3-77
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties:
Tenant Summary(1) | ||||||||
Tenant Name | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P)(2) |
Property Count |
Tenant SF | Approximate % of SF | Annual |
% of Total Annual UW Base Rent | Annual UW Base Rent PSF |
Lease
Expiration |
FedEx Ground | NR/Baa2/BBB | 3 | 224,567 | 48.9% | $1,410,887 | 32.8% | $6.28 | Various(3) |
Bridgestone HOSEpower | NR/NR/A | 4 | 78,004 | 17.0% | $772,874 | 17.9% | $9.91 | Various(4) |
Dollar General | NR/Baa2/BBB | 8 | 72,480 | 15.8% | $825,898 | 19.2% | $11.39 | Various(5) |
Tractor Supply | NR/NR/NR | 2 | 51,224 | 11.2% | $258,692 | 6.0% | $5.05 | Various(6) |
Jo-Ann Fabrics | NR/Caa1/B | 1 | 18,000 | 3.9% | $153,153 | 3.6% | $8.51 | 1/31/2025(7) |
Chili’s | NR/NR/NR | 2 | 12,078 | 2.6% | $595,151 | 13.8% | $49.28 | 10/31/2027(8) |
Sonic Drive-In | NR/NR/NR | 2 | 2,877 | 0.6% | $290,807 | 6.8% | $101.08 | 6/30/2032(9) |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 459,230 | 100.0% | $4,307,463 | 100.0% | $9.38 | |||
Vacant Space | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | |||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 459,230 | 100.0% | $4,307,463 | 100.0% | $9.38 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent company guarantees the lease. |
(3) | FedEx Ground is a tenant at three of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with leases that expire between May 31, 2026 and June 30, 2027. FedEx Ground has two five-year renewal options at each property. |
(4) | Bridgestone HOSEpower is a tenant at four of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with leases that expire between September 30, 2029 and December 31, 2031. Bridgestone HOSEpower has three five-year renewal options at each property. |
(5) | Dollar General is a tenant at eight of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with leases that expire between October 31, 2028 and August 31, 2030. Dollar General has four five-year renewal options at each property. |
(6) | Tractor Supply is a tenant at two of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with leases that expire on August 31, 2026 and January 31, 2027. Tractor Supply has four five-year renewal options at each property. |
(7) | Jo-Ann Fabrics is a tenant at one of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with a lease that expires on January 31, 2025. Jo-Ann Fabrics has three five-year renewal options. |
(8) | Chili’s is a tenant at two of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with leases that expire on October 31, 2027 at each property. Chili’s has four five-year renewal options at each property. |
(9) | Sonic Drive-In is a tenant at two of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties with leases that expire on June 30, 2032 at each property. Sonic Drive-In has five five-year renewal options at each property. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Base Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Base Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2025 | 1 | 18,000 | 3.9% | 3.9% | $8.51 | $153,153 | 3.6% | 3.6% |
2026 | 2 | 79,351 | 17.3% | 21.2% | $6.06 | $481,102 | 11.2% | 14.7% |
2027 | 5 | 208,518 | 45.4% | 66.6% | $8.55 | $1,783,629 | 41.4% | 56.1% |
2028 | 2 | 18,126 | 3.9% | 70.6% | $10.85 | $196,584 | 4.6% | 60.7% |
2029 & Beyond | 12 | 135,235 | 29.4% | 100.0% | $12.52 | $1,692,996 | 39.3% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 22 | 459,230 | 100.0% | $9.38 | $4,307,463 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
A-3-78
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
The Market. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties are located across 12 states and 19 distinct markets. The following table presents certain market information relating to the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties:
Market Summary | |||||
Property Name | Market(1) | Market Vacancy(1) | Rental Rate PSF | ||
Property Type | Actual(2) | Market(1)(3) | |||
FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO | Industrial | Phelps | 2.5% | $5.51 | $5.50 |
Chili’s - Machesney Park, IL | Retail | Chicago | 10.5% | $53.24 | $53.00 |
FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN | Industrial | Minneapolis/St. Paul | 4.2% | $6.28 | $6.25 |
FedEx Ground - Casper, WY | Industrial | Natrona | 11.1% | $10.01 | $10.01 |
Chili’s - McHenry, IL | Retail | Chicago | 10.5% | $43.86 | $44.00 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Sulphur, LA | Industrial | Calcasieu Parish | 9.6% | $10.72 | $10.72 |
Sonic - Tuscaloosa, AL | Retail | Metro Birmingham | 5.6% | $150.59 | $150.00 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Columbia, SC | Industrial | Columbia | 7.2% | $8.68 | $8.50 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Jacksonville, FL | Industrial | Jacksonville | 4.2% | $6.09 | $6.00 |
Bridgestone HOSEpower - Elko, NV | Industrial | Elko | 0.8% | $12.41 | $12.66 |
Jo-Ann - Freeport, IL | Retail | Chicago | 10.5% | $8.51 | $8.50 |
Tractor Supply - Hazen, ND | Retail | Hazen | 3.4% | $5.60 | $5.60 |
Dollar General - Kingston, NY | Retail | Ulster | 3.6% | $12.78 | $12.75 |
Sonic - Robertsdale, AL | Retail | Baldwin | 3.7% | $62.72 | $63.00 |
Tractor Supply - Flandreau, SD | Retail | Flandreau | 2.5% | $4.50 | $4.50 |
Dollar General - Farmington, NY | Retail | Rochester | 5.4% | $12.10 | $12.00 |
Dollar General - Otego, NY | Retail | Otsego | 1.3% | $11.68 | $11.50 |
Dollar General - Kerhonkson, NY | Retail | Kerhonkson | N/A | $11.47 | $11.50 |
Dollar General - Dewitt, NY | Retail | Southeast Outer Onondaga | 3.6% | $11.13 | $11.00 |
Dollar General - Utica, NY | Retail | Utica-Rome | 3.6% | $10.80 | $11.25 |
Dollar General - Parish, NY | Retail | Syracuse | 3.6% | $10.89 | $10.75 |
Dollar General - Geddes, NY | Retail | Syracuse | 3.6% | $10.30 | $10.00 |
Weighted Average | 5.7%(4) | $9.20(5) | $9.18(5) |
(1) | Information is based on the appraisals. |
(2) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(3) | Information is based on the appraisal market rent conclusions for each property. |
(4) | Weighted Average Market Vacancy is based on the Cut-off Date allocated loan amount. |
(5) | Weighted Average Actual Rental Rate PSF and Market Rental Rate PSF are based on square footage. |
A-3-79
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014(1) | 2015(1) | 2016(1) | TTM(1) | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $4,307,463 | $9.38 |
Total Recoveries(3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $496,106 | $1.08 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
($156,532) |
($0.34) |
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $4,647,036 | $10.12 |
Total Operating Expenses(4) | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$496,106 |
$1.08 |
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $4,150,930 | $9.04 |
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $49,287 | $0.11 |
TI/LC | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$237,125 |
$0.52 |
Net Cash Flow | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $3,864,518 | $8.42 |
Occupancy % | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 96.7% | |
NOI DSCR | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 3.01x | |
NCF DSCR | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.81x | |
NOI Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12.4% | |
NCF Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11.6% |
(1) | Historical cash flows are unavailable as the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties were acquired by the borrower sponsor between March 31, 2017 and November 7, 2017. According to the borrower sponsor, the sellers of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties did not provide historical operating statements to the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers. |
(2) | UW Gross Potential Rent is based on in-place rent per lease, approximately $73,245 of straight-line rent attributable to Bridgestone HOSEpower, an investment grade tenant, and $8,795 for rent steps for Chili’s in the first 12 months of the loan term. |
(3) | UW Total Recoveries are underwritten based on tenant leases. |
(4) | UW Total Operating Expenses include real estate taxes and management fees calculated as 2.0% of AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties effective gross income. |
Escrows and Reserves. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents provide for upfront escrows in the amount of $113,903 for real estate taxes and $33,402 for deferred maintenance.
During the occurrence and continuance of a Trigger Period (as defined below) the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents provide for ongoing monthly escrows of 1/12 of the estimated annual taxes, 1/12 of the annual insurance premiums (provided an acceptable blanket policy is no longer in place), $57,404 for tenant improvement and leasing commissions (“TI/LCs”) and $9,567 for replacement reserves. During the occurrence and continuance of a Rollover Trigger Period (as defined below), the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers will also be required to deposit excess cash flow into the TI/LCs account until the Rollover Trigger Period Cap (defined below) is satisfied. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers will not be required to provide monthly real estate taxes and insurance premiums, which are solely the obligation of each tenant and paid directly to the relevant taxing authority or insurance company by each tenant in accordance with each tenant’s lease, for so long as (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing and (ii) the lease(s) with the applicable tenant(s) will be and continue to be in full force and effect and will not be subject to any default beyond any applicable grace or notice and cure period by either the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers or the tenant.
A “Trigger Period” will occur upon (i) an event of default, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio as of the last day of any calendar quarter falling below 1.50x and (iii) at any time after December 31, 2026, the debt service coverage ratio as of the last day of any calendar quarter falling below 2.24x (as calculated pursuant to the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents). A Trigger Period will continue until, in regard to clause (i) above, the cure of such event of default, and in regard to clause (ii) above, the debt service coverage ratio is at least 1.50x for two consecutive quarters.
A “Rollover Trigger Period” will commence upon the date that either (a) three or more tenants or (b) tenants under leases representing 10.0% or more of the aggregate base rent of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties (i) have terminated the applicable leases or such leases have expired and have not been re-tenanted as required under the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) are not in occupancy of the premises demised under the applicable leases for any reason for a period of 30 consecutive days or (iii) are bankrupt or otherwise subject to insolvency or similar proceedings. A Rollover Trigger Period will continue until (i) an amount equal to $20.00 per SF with respect to the space demised pursuant to such affected leases (the “Rollover Trigger Period Cap”) will be deposited into the TI/LCs account or (ii) the applicable AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Property which contains the demised space will be subject to a release or substitution in accordance with the terms of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents.
The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan Borrowers may deliver a letter of credit to lender to satisfy reserve requirements for immediate repairs, replacements and TI/LCs, in an amount equal to the amount otherwise required to be deposited in such reserve. Additionally, the Mortgage Loan Borrowers may deliver a letter of credit to lender to satisfy reserve requirements for the excess reserve account in an amount equal to the amount otherwise required to be deposited plus the excess cash flow projected to be collected and reserved for the succeeding three months.
A-3-80
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 9 AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,400,000 53.4% 2.81x 12.4% |
Lockbox and Cash Management. A hard lockbox is in place with respect to the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan and on each business day, funds in the hard lockbox account are transferred to a cash management account. On each business day, other than during the occurrence and continuance of either a Trigger Period or Rollover Trigger Period, all amounts on deposit in the cash management account will be distributed to an account designated by the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers. During the continuance of a Trigger Period or a Rollover Trigger Period, funds on deposit in the cash management account will be disbursed in accordance with the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents with all excess funds collected and reserved in an excess cash flow account. During the occurrence of a Rollover Trigger Period, prior to excess cash flow being reserved in the excess cash flow account, all excess cash flow will be deposited into the TI/LCs account until the Rollover Trigger Period Cap is satisfied.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Release of Property. Provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing (unless such event of default related solely to the release property and such release would cause such event of default to be cured in full), the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers may obtain the release of any of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties by electing either (i) partial defeasance (any time after two years after the closing of the UBS 2018-C8 transaction and before October 6, 2027) in the amount equal to the Release Amount (as defined below) with respect to the applicable release property or (ii) a partial prepayment of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan (after the 12th monthly payment date and before October 6, 2027) in an amount equal to the Release Amount accompanied by a yield maintenance premium. The applicable release must satisfy each of the following conditions: (i) 30 days prior written notice of the proposed release, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio for the remaining AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties following the release based on the trailing 12 months is no less than the greater of the debt service coverage ratio immediately preceding such release and 2.81x, (iii) the loan-to-value ratio for the remaining AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties following the release is no greater than the lesser of the loan-to-value ratio immediately preceding such release and 53.4%, (iv) the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers and the guarantor execute and deliver such documents as lender may reasonably request to confirm the continued validity of the loan documents and liens, (v) satisfaction of REMIC requirements and (vi) other conditions set forth in the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
A “Release Amount” is an amount equal to 120.0% of the Cut-Off Date allocated loan amount with respect to the applicable release property.
Substitution. Provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing (unless such event of default related solely to the release property and such substitution would cause such event of default to be cured in full), in connection with the release of property above, in lieu of partially defeasing or partially prepaying the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers may obtain the release of any AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties by providing one or more substitute properties (individually or collectively, the “Substitute Property”), provided that, among other things, (i) during the term of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers may only make four substitutions (substitution of the FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO property will be considered two substitutions) unless the tenant with the space demised at the related release property has terminated their lease or has gone dark, (ii) 60 days prior written notice, (iii) the Substitute Property is required to be a retail or industrial property (unless that release property is FedEx Ground - Rolla, MO, FedEx Ground - Brainerd, MN or FedEx Ground - Casper, WY, the Substitute Property is required to be an industrial property) to a tenant with a credit rating not less than the tenant occupying the applicable release property under a NNN lease with (a) a term equal to or longer than the longer of the term of lease at the release property and five years past the maturity date of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan, (b) net rent equal to or greater than the greater of the rent under the lease at the applicable release property on the origination date and immediately prior to the substitution and (c) no monetary obligations thereunder are the responsibility of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers, (iv) delivery of a satisfactory estoppel, third party reports, and other such documents required as lender may reasonably request to confirm the continued validity of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents and liens, (v) satisfaction of REMIC requirements, (vi) rating agency confirmation and (vii) other conditions set forth in the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
Terrorism Insurance. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents require that an “all risk” insurance policy be maintained by the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Borrowers and such policy must provide coverage for terrorism in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Properties, provided that such coverage is available. The AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio Mortgage Loan documents also require business interruption insurance covering no less than the 12-month period following the occurrence of a casualty event, together with a six-month extended period of indemnity
A-3-81
2855 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Residence Inn Irvine
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,000,000 60.0% 2.65x 14.0% |
A-3-82
2855 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Residence Inn Irvine
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,000,000 60.0% 2.65x 14.0% |
A-3-83
2855 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Residence Inn Irvine
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,000,000 60.0% 2.65x 14.0% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | |||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Société Générale | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | |||
Original Balance: | $33,000,000 | Location: | Irvine, CA 92614 | |||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $33,000,000 | General Property Type: | Hospitality | |||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 3.2% | Detailed Property Type: | Extended Stay | |||
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Title Vesting: | Leasehold | |||
Borrower Sponsors: | Robert D. Olson; Robert D. Olson, Trustee of the Robert D. Olson Separate Property Trust, Established July 1, 2003 | Year Built/Renovated: | 2000/2017 | |||
Size: | 174 Rooms | |||||
Cut-off Date Balance per Room: | $189,655 | |||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.6350% | Maturity Date Balance per Room: | $189,655 | |||
Note Date: | 1/12/2018 | Property Manager: | Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC | |||
First Payment Date: | 3/1/2018 | |||||
Maturity Date: | 2/1/2028 | |||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | |||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | ||||
IO Period: | 120 months | UW NOI: | $4,612,142 | |||
Seasoning: | 0 months | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 14.0% | |||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (61); YM1 (55); O (4) | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 14.0% | |||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/Springing | UW NCF DSCR: | 2.65x | |||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | Most Recent NOI: | $4,760,126 (11/30/2017 TTM) | |||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $4,937,524 (12/31/2016) | |||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 3rd Most Recent NOI: | $4,715,720 (12/31/2015) | |||
Reserves(1) | Most Recent Occupancy: | 87.2% (12/15/2017) | ||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 85.9% (12/31/2016) | |
RE Tax: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 85.9% (12/31/2015) | |
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $55,000,000 (10/31/2017) | |
FF&E: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 60.0% | |
Ground Rent Reserve: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 60.0% |
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $33,000,000 | 100.0% | Loan Payoff: | $31,278,074 | 94.8% | |
Closing Costs: | $379,563 | 1.2% | ||||
Return of Equity: | $1,342,363 | 4.1% | ||||
Total Sources: | $33,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $33,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | See “Escrows and Reserves” below for further discussion of reserve requirements. |
The Mortgage Loan. The tenth largest mortgage loan (the “Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a promissory note with an original principal amount of $33,000,000, secured by a leasehold interest in a 174-room extended stay hospitality property located in Irvine, California (the “Residence Inn Irvine Property”) under the Marriott flag. The proceeds of the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan were used to refinance an existing loan, fund reserves, pay closing costs and return equity to the borrower sponsor.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrower is Main Street Hotels, LLC (the “Residence Inn Irvine Borrower”), a single purpose California limited liability company structured to be bankruptcy remote, with one independent director. The non-recourse carveout guarantors and borrower sponsors are Robert Olson and Robert D. Olson, Trustee of the Robert D. Olson Separate Property Trust, Established July 1, 2003. Robert Olson is the founder of R.D. Olson Development, a Newport Beach, California based firm engaged in the development and re-positioning of commercial properties throughout the United States. In December 2016, R.D. Olson Development was awarded Development Partner of the Year by Marriott International at the hotelier’s Full Service Owner’s Conference in Washington, D.C. Mr. Olson established R.D. Olson Development in 1997 following nearly 20 years as founder and CEO of R.D. Olson Construction.
The Property. The Residence Inn Irvine Property is a 174-room, eight-story, extended stay hotel located in Irvine, California, less than 1.5 miles from John Wayne Airport, six miles from Newport Beach, and ten miles from Disneyland. The Residence Inn Irvine Property was constructed in 2000 by the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower and has undergone multiple renovations since its opening. According to the appraisal, the last renovation, which was completed in March 2017, included meeting space and, lobby renovations and corridor upgrades. The guestrooms were last renovated in 2014 with a $1.4 million PIP ($8,297 per room). Since 2014, the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower has spent a total of $4.7 million ($26,922 per room) to meet Marriott’s current brand standards.
The guestroom mix includes 105 studio suites, 39 one-bedroom suites and 30 two-bedroom suites. In-room amenities include iron and ironing board, kitchen with coffeemaker, and hairdryer. The Residence Inn Irvine Property guestrooms feature fully equipped kitchens with refrigerators, stoves, microwaves, dishwashers, dishes, pots/pans, and cooking utensils. The bathrooms have tub/shower combinations in some rooms, and walk-in showers
A-3-84
2855 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Residence Inn Irvine
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,000,000 60.0% 2.65x 14.0% |
in others. The standard rooms at the Residence Inn Irvine Property feature either one king size or two queen size beds; however, the two-bedroom suites feature both. The Residence Inn Irvine Property amenities include a swimming pool and spa, multi-purpose sports court, fitness center, business center, picnic area with an outdoor grill, complimentary Wi-Fi, complimentary airport shuttle, and a lounge/breakfast area where complimentary breakfast is served daily. Parking is provided by 240 surface level parking spaces or 1.38 parking space per room.
According to the appraisal, the Residence Inn Irvine Property generates approximately 60% of its room revenue from corporate demand, approximately 32% from a combination of leisure and tourism demand and approximately 9% from convention group demand.
The Residence Inn Irvine Property is ground leased from The Carter Family Investment Partnership on a 4.2-acre site and has a remaining term of approximately 132 years, including renewal options. The ground lease commenced in January 1, 2000 with a 30-year term and has four, 30-year renewal options at the tenant’s sole option. The lessee, R.D. Olson Development Company, currently pays base rent of approximately $425,328 per annum NNN, which is adjusted every year by multiplying the monthly rent for the previous lease year by the consumer price index. The Residence Inn Irvine Property subleases approximately 7,744 SF to Souplantation Restaurant, a freestanding building pad in the southwestern corner of the Residence Inn Irvine Property. The lease commenced on April 11, 2001 with a 20-year term and has two five-year renewal options. The sub-lessee, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp., currently pays base rent of approximately $172,910 per annum NNN, which is adjusted every fifth year by multiplying the monthly rent for the previous lease year by the consumer price index. Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. also pays percentage rent in an amount equal to the difference between (i) 3% of gross sales and (ii) the monthly installment of minimum annual rent payable during such month (determined and payable on a monthly basis).
Residence Inn Irvine Market Historical Occupancy, ADR, RevPAR | |||||||||
Competitive Set(1) | Residence Inn Irvine | Penetration Factor | |||||||
Year | Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR | Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR | Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR |
12/31/2015 TTM | 82.8% | $125.26 | $103.72 | 85.4% | $173.72 | $148.42 | 103.2% | 138.7% | 143.1% |
12/31/2016 TTM | 84.3% | $129.02 | $108.82 | 85.7% | $179.52 | $153.90 | 101.6% | 139.1% | 141.4% |
10/31/2017 TTM | 83.6% | $132.78 | $110.95 | 86.3% | $174.62 | $150.64 | 103.2% | 131.5% | 135.8% |
Source: Industry Report
(1) | The competitive set includes Residence Inn Irvine John Wayne Airport Orange County, Embassy Suites Irvine Orange County Airport, Wyndham Irvine Orange County Airport, Ayres Hotel & Suites Costa Mesa, Candlewood Suites Orange County Airport Irvine West and DoubleTree Santa Ana Orange County Airport. |
The Market. The Residence Inn Irvine Property is located in the northwest portion of the city of Irvine, California adjacent to the John Wayne Airport and 1.1 miles east from Irvine Business Complex. Primary regional access to the Residence Inn Irvine Property’s neighborhood is provided by Interstate 405/San Diego Freeway (0.3 miles south), and Highway 55/Costa Mesa Freeway (1.0 mile north). Interstate 405/San Diego Freeway is a north/south bypass auxiliary route of Interstate 5, which extends south through San Diego to the Mexican border and north through Los Angeles, Sacramento, and Seattle, WA to the Canadian border. On a local level, the Residence Inn Irvine Property is situated along Main Street, which connects the Residence Inn Irvine Property to Santa Ana (8.8 miles northwest).
The Residence Inn Irvine Property’s major demand drivers include John Wayne Airport, Disneyland, the Anaheim Convention Center, Knott’s Berry Farm, Irvine Spectrum, South Coast Plaza, Fashion Island, University of California-Irvine, and Segerstrom Center for the Arts, among others. According to the appraisal, the Residence Inn Irvine Property is located less than 1.5 miles from the John Wayne Airport, the only commercial airport within Orange County. More than ten million passengers passed through John Wayne Airport in 2016, a growth of 8.7% from 2013. Between October 2016 and October 2017, passenger traffic increased by 1.4%. Commercial aircraft operations increased 3.2% and commuter aircraft operations decreased 28.4% when compared with October 2016 levels. Disneyland, located 10 miles north of the Residence Inn Irvine Property, is one of two theme parks built at the Disneyland Resort in the city of Anaheim, California. It also features the newly expanded Disney California Adventure Park which includes the new 12-acre Cars Land, the cornerstone of Disney’s $1.0 billion expansion. In addition, the Residence Inn Irvine Property benefits from the 1.6 million SF Anaheim Convention Center, located 14.0 miles northwest of the Residence Inn Irvine Property. The Anaheim Convention Center is the largest convention center on the West Coast and the 6th largest in the nation. The center features 815,000 SF of exhibit space, 130,000 SF of meeting space and a range of outdoor function space that contains the 100,000 SF Grand Plaza, which opened January 2013. In September 2017, the Anaheim Convention Center had the grand opening of its 7th expansion, which is referred to as ACC North. It added 200,000 SF of flexible space, which can be used for exhibits, meeting rooms or ballroom functions. There is also a 1,400-space parking structure. This 2017 addition increased the Anaheim Convention Center’s total exhibit space to over 1.0 million SF. The University of California-Irvine, located 2.8 miles south of the Residence Inn Irvine Property, is Orange County’s second largest employer with an estimated annual economic impact of $4.2 billion and over 28,000 students.
The Residence Inn Irvine Property is located within the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, California metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”). A third-party market data provider reports that the MSA had a population of approximately 10.2 million as of August 2017, which represents a 0.2% increase over 2016. The population increased 2.7% from 2011 to 2017, and is expected to increase an additional 2.0% through 2022.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the MSA had an unemployment rate of 4.1% in November 2017, down from 4.8% in November 2016. According to a third party market research report, the estimated 2017 population within a one-, three- and five-mile radius of the Residence Inn Irvine Property is 19,800, 150,517 and 528,979, respectively. The estimated 2017 average household income within a one-, three- and five-mile radius of the Residence Inn Irvine Property is $111,015, $110,679 and $112,497, respectively.
The appraiser also identified eight new and/or planned hotels within the Residence Inn Irvine Property’s market, four of which are considered somewhat competitive, although none directly. The appraiser’s consideration for the four competitive hotels equates to a competitive ratio of 37.0%. Of the competitive hotels, the 161-room Homewood Suites by Hilton Irvine John Wayne Airport and 149-room Hyatt House Irvine opened on December 31, 2016 and April 4, 2017, respectively. The 168-room Staybridge Irvine is projected to open on November 1, 2018 and the 122-room Element Irvine – 17662 Armstrong is projected to open on April 2, 2019. The non-competitive hotels consist of a 176-room AC Hotels by Marriott, 164-room Hampton Inn Irvine, 271-room Marriott Irvine Spectrum, and 165-room TownePlace Suites. The appraiser reported that the AC and Marriott Irvine are full service hotels, which are not directly competitive. In addition, the Hampton Inn Irvine is a limited service hotel and the TownPlace Suites is inferior in terms of quality. After accounting for this new supply, the appraiser concluded to a stabilized occupancy rate of 86.0% and RevPAR of $155.65 for the year ending October 30, 2017.
A-3-85
2855 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Residence Inn Irvine
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,000,000 60.0% 2.65x 14.0% |
Competitive properties to the Residence Inn Irvine Property are shown in the table below:
Competitive Set | ||||||||
Property | Rooms | Year Built | 2016 Occupancy |
2016 Average ADR | 2016 RevPAR | 2017 Occupancy |
2017 Average ADR | 2017 RevPAR |
Residence Inn Irvine | 174 | 2000 | 85.0% | $180.02 | $154.16 | 86.0% | $174.44 | $150.07 |
Springhill Suites Irvine | 132 | 2009 | 88.0% | $145 | $127.11 | 80.0%-85.0% | $145.00-$150.00 | $120.00-$125.00 |
Doubletree Santa Ana | 253 | 2002 | 87.0% | $130 | $113.62 | 80.0%-85.0% | $140.00-$145.00 | $115.00-$120.00 |
Embassy Suites by Hilton Irvine | 295 | 1986 | 73.0% | $157 | $114.61 | 80.0%-85.0% | $160.00-$170.00 | $130.00-$135.00 |
Courtyard Irvine John Wayne Airport | 153 | 1989 | 77.0% | $160 | $122.45 | 75.0%-80.0% | $155.00-$165.00 | $120.00-$125.00 |
Hilton Garden Inn | 170 | 2015 | 79.0% | $151.06 | $119.34 | 80.0%-85.0% | $150.00-$160.00 | $125.00-$130.00 |
Homewood Suites by Hilton Irvine John Wayne Airport | 161 | 2017 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 65.0%-70.0% | $140.00-$145.00 | $95.00-$100.00 |
Source: Appraisal
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Residence Inn Irvine Property.
Cash Flow Analysis | |||||
2015 | 2016 | 11/30/2017 TTM | UW | UW per Room | |
Occupancy | 85.9% | 85.9% | 87.3% | 87.2% | |
ADR | $172.84 | $179.08 | $174.06 | $174.06 | |
RevPAR | $148.42 | $153.90 | $151.86 | $151.86 | |
Rooms Revenue | $9,426,257 | $9,800,755 | $9,644,732 | $9,644,732 | $55,429 |
Food & Beverage | $115,240 | $112,327 | $108,983 | $108,983 | $626 |
Other Income(1) | $403,343 |
$372,369 |
$377,464 |
$351,715 |
$2,021 |
Total Revenue | $9,944,840 | $10,285,451 | $10,131,179 | $10,105,430 | $58,077 |
Total Expenses | $5,229,120 |
$5,347,927 |
$5,371,053 |
$5,493,288 |
$31,571 |
Net Operating Income | $4,715,720 | $4,937,524 | $4,760,126 | $4,612,142 | $26,507 |
FF&E | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$505,272 |
$2,904 |
Net Cash Flow | $4,715,720 | $4,937,524 | $4,760,126 | $4,106,870 | $23,603 |
NOI DSCR | 3.04x | 3.18x | 3.07x | 2.97x | |
NCF DSCR | 3.04x | 3.18x | 3.07x | 2.65x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 14.3% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 14.0% | |
NCF Debt Yield | 14.3% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 12.4% |
(1) | Other Income includes telephone revenue, market, grocery and vending services and other miscellaneous revenue. |
Escrows and Reserves. On a monthly basis, the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower is required to deposit (i) 1/12 of the annual estimated tax payments, (ii) 1/12 of the annual estimated insurance premiums, (iii) 1/12 of 5.0% of gross revenues for each fiscal year (as such terms are defined in the management agreement) excluding extraordinary items of income for capital/FF&E expenses and (iv) an amount that is estimated by the lender to be sufficient to pay any installment of ground rent under the ground lease at least 20 days before its due date.
The lender waived monthly deposits into the tax reserve provided that (a) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower strictly complies with all of its obligations under the management agreement (with respect to tax impounds and payment of taxes); (b) all taxes are paid before delinquency and (c) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower provides to the lender, without further request from the lender, evidence of timely payment of taxes before delinquency. The lender waived monthly deposits into the insurance reserve, provided that (A) (x) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower participates in an insurance program offered by the manager and strictly complies with all obligations under the management agreement with respect to insurance reserves and payment of insurance premiums; (y) all insurance premiums are paid before delinquency, and (z) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower provides to the lender, without further notice of timely payment of insurance premiums before delinquency or (B) (i) no Cash Management Period (as defined below) is continuing; (ii) the policies maintained by the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower covering the Residence Inn Irvine Property are approved by the lender, which policies may be part of a blanket or umbrella policy, in which case the lender’s the approval will include, without limitation, approval of the schedule of locations and values; (iii) all insurance premiums are paid before delinquency; (iv) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower provides the lender evidence of renewal of such policies; and (v) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower provides to the lender evidence of timely payment of insurance premiums before delinquency. The lender also waived monthly deposits into the capital/FF&E expense reserve; provided that (i) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower satisfies certain post-origination obligations detailed in the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) the manager is holding the reserve pursuant to the reserve account agreement (and so long as the account(s) under the reserve account agreement are opened by February 25, 2018) and (iii) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower strictly complies with all of its obligations under the management agreement with respect to reserves for and payment of capital/FF&E expenses. Unless the manager is collecting ground rent installments pursuant to the management agreement (and then, only to the extent or percentage of ground rent installments so collected), in which case the ground rent subaccount is waived, then during the continuance of a Cash Management Period, the Residence
A-3-86
2855 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614
|
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 10 Residence Inn Irvine
|
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$33,000,000 60.0% 2.65x 14.0% |
Inn Irvine Borrower will pay to the lender on each payment date an amount that is estimated by the lender to be sufficient to pay any installment of ground rent under the ground lease at least 20 days before its due date and the lender will transfer such amounts to a subaccount.
Lockbox and Cash Management. The Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan has a hard lockbox with springing cash management upon the occurrence and continuance of a Cash Management Period (as defined below).
A “Cash Management Period” will commence upon the occurrence of any of the following: (i) the maturity date, (ii) an event of default, (iii) if, as of the last day of the calendar quarter, the debt service coverage ratio (as determined under the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan documents) is less than 1.30x, (iv) a default has occurred and continues beyond any applicable cure period under the management agreement (or any successor management agreement) and such default permits the manager to cancel or terminate the management agreement (or any successor management agreement), (v) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower or manager delivers notice of its intent to terminate the management agreement, (vi) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower or manager terminates the management agreement or (vii) the date that is twelve months prior to the expiration of the management agreement; and will end upon the lender giving notice to the clearing bank that the sweeping of funds into the cash management account may cease, which notice the lender is only be required to give if (1) the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan and all other obligations under the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan documents have been repaid in full or (2) the maturity date has not occurred and (A) with respect to the matters described in clause (ii) above, such event of default has been cured and no other event of default has occurred and is continuing or (B) with respect to the matter described in clause (iii) above, the lender has determined that the Residence Inn Irvine Property has achieved a debt service coverage ratio (as determined under the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan documents) of at least 1.30x for two consecutive calendar quarters or (C) with respect to the matter described in clause (iv) above, upon the cure (if applicable) of such default under the management agreement (or any successor management agreement) and acceptance of such cure by manager as evidenced by a written statement from manager in a form acceptable to the lender in its commercially reasonable discretion (provided that no other Cash Management Period has occurred and is continuing) or (D) with respect to the matter described in clause (v) above, upon the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower or manager withdrawing its notice of intent to terminate the management agreement (provided that no other Cash Management Period has occurred and is continuing), or (E) with respect to the matter described in clauses (iv), (v) or (vi) above, (x) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower enters into a qualified management agreement for a term that does not expire until a date which is no earlier than December 31, 2031 and (y) the term of such Qualified Management Agreement (as defined below) has commenced (provided that no other Cash Management Period has occurred and is continuing) or (F) with respect to the matter described in clause (vii) above, (I) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower extends or renews the management agreement for a term that does not expire until a date which is no earlier than December 31, 2031, (II) (x) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower enters into a Qualified Management Agreement for a term that does not expire until a date which is no earlier than December 31, 2031 and (y) the term of such Qualified Management Agreement has commenced or (III) the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower delivers a letter of credit in an amount equal to $2,750,000 and otherwise in accordance with the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan agreement (provided that, in each such case, no other Cash Management Period has occurred and is continuing).
A “Qualified Management Agreement” means a management agreement with a Qualified Manager (as defined below) with respect to the Residence Inn Irvine Property which is approved by the lender in writing (which such approval will not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, that such approval may be conditioned upon the lender’s receipt of a rating comfort letter with respect to such management agreement).
A “Qualified Manager” means a reputable and experienced manager possessing experience in operating hotel properties similar in size, scope, use and value as the Residence Inn Irvine Property and approved by the lender in writing (which such approval may be granted or withheld in the lender’s reasonable discretion and may be conditioned upon lender’s receipt of a rating comfort letter with respect to such person).
Right of First Offer. The manager of the Residence Inn Irvine Property has a right of first refusal to purchase the Residence Inn Irvine Property in the event the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower receives an acceptable bona fide offer (if the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower is the offeree), which offer is accepted, or acceptance of a bona fide offer (if the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower is the offeror) from a third party to purchase the Residence Inn Irvine Property. In such event, the Residence Inn Irvine Borrower will extend the right of first refusal to purchase the Residence Inn Irvine Property to the manager on the terms of such offer, except as otherwise provided in the management agreement. The manager’s right of first refusal is fully subordinated to the Residence Inn Irvine Mortgage Loan and does not apply to foreclosure or deed-in-lieu thereof.
Additional Secured Indebtedness (not including trade debts). Not permitted.
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity. Not permitted.
Release of Property. Not permitted.
Terrorism Insurance. The Residence Inn Irvine Borrower is required to obtain and maintain property insurance, commercial general liability insurance, and business income or rental loss insurance that covers perils of terrorism and acts of terrorism, both foreign and domestic.
A-3-87
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 GNL Industrial Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$32,750,000 52.3% 2.76x 12.5% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Properties Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Ladder Capital Finance LLC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Portfolio(1) | ||||
Original Balance: | $32,750,000 | Location: | Various | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $32,750,000 | General Properties Type: | Industrial | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 3.1% | Detailed Properties Type: | Various | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee/Leasehold | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | Global Net Lease Operating Partnership, L.P. | Year Built/Renovated: | Various | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.3200% | Size: | 627,526 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 1/26/2018 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF: | $52 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 3/6/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF: | $52 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2028 | Properties Manager: | N/A (tenant-managed) | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
IO Period: | 120 months | UW NOI: | $4,081,107 | ||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 12.5% | ||||
Prepayment Provisions(1): | LO (12); YM1 (104); O (4) | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 12.5% | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Hard/In Place | UW NCF DSCR: | 2.76x | ||||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | 2nd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 3rd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||||
Reserves(2) | Most Recent Occupancy(3): | 100.0% (2/1/2018) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy(3): | N/A | ||
RE Tax: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy(3): | N/A | ||
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Appraised Value (as of)(4): | $62,625,000 (Various) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(4): | 52.3% | ||
Deferred Maintenance: | $0 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(4): | 52.3% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $32,750,000 | 53.7% | Purchase Price(5): | $60,183,472 | 98.7% | |
Borrower Equity: | $28,211,155 | 46.3% | Closing Costs: | $777,684 | 1.3% | |
Total Sources: | $60,961,155 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $60,961,155 | 100.0% |
(1) | Any time after the expiration of the prepayment lockout period, the GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers (as defined below) may obtain the release of any GNL Industrial Portfolio Property (as defined below), provided, among other things, (i) it does not release more than one of the 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property, the 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property or the 350 International Drive Mortgaged Property, (ii) it makes a payment of a release price equal to (x) 125% of the allocated loan amount for the 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property, the 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property or the 350 International Drive Mortgaged Property and (y) 115% of the allocated loan amount for the other applicable GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties, in each case, plus any required yield maintenance premium, (iii) the debt service coverage ratio at the time of release is no less than the greater of (x) 2.79x or (y) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to such release and (iv) the loan-to-value ratio is no more than the lesser of (x) 52.2% and (y) the loan-to-value ratio immediately prior to the release of the applicable GNL Industrial Portfolio Property. The related loan documents also permit property substitutions. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”. |
(2) | Monthly real estate, tax and insurance deposits are waived so long as the tenants are making the payments in a timely fashion and the leases remain in full force and effect. |
(3) | Historical financials and occupancy information are unavailable for the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties, as the GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers recently acquired the properties. All GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties are single tenant with NNN leases. |
(4) | The appraisal concluded a hypothetical “dark value” of $38,550,000 for the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties. Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio based on the hypothetical “dark value” are 85.0% and 85.0%, respectively. |
(5) | The GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties were purchased between September and December of 2017 and were held unlevered until the origination of the GNL Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan. |
The Mortgage Loan. The eleventh largest mortgage loan (the “GNL Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a promissory note in the original principal amount of $32,750,000 secured by first priority fee and leasehold mortgages encumbering an eight property industrial warehouse/distribution, flex/R&D, and manufacturing portfolio located across six states totaling 627,526 SF (the “GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties”). The proceeds of the GNL Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan along with equity contributions from the GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers were used to acquire the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties, and pay closing costs.
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrowers are ARG BSMTONJ001, LLC; ARG GKCNCOH001, LLC; ARG NIJNBVT001, LLC; ARG NIJNBVT002, LLC; ARG NIJNBVT003, LLC; ARG NIGVTNH001, LLC; ARG TRWXMMI001, LLC; and ARG CMOMHNE001, LLC (the “GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers”), each a single-purpose Delaware single member limited liability company. The borrower sponsor and carve-out guarantor is Global Net Lease Operating Partnership, L.P. As of September 30, 2017, Global Net Lease Operating Partnership, L.P. owned 313 properties consisting of 22.3 million rentable SF, which were 99.4% leased with a weighted average remaining lease term of 9.1 years.
The Properties. The GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties are comprised of 8 single-tenant industrial properties totaling 627,526 SF located throughout Vermont (3 properties) and New Hampshire, Ohio, Nebraska, Michigan and New Jersey (1 property in each state). The GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties were constructed between 1967 and 2017 and range in size from 40,800 SF to 127,105 SF. The GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties are 100.0% occupied as of February 1, 2018.
A-3-88
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 GNL Industrial Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$32,750,000 52.3% 2.76x 12.5% |
The following table present certain information relating to the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Portfolio Summary | |||||||||
Properties Name | Location | Year Built/ Renovated | Net Rentable Area (SF)(1) | UW NCF | % of UW NCF | Allocated Cut-off Date Balance(2) |
% of Whole Loan Cut-off Date Balance |
Appraised Value | Allocated Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2) |
46643 Ryan Court | Wixom, MI | 2015/NAP | 127,105 | $1,465,694 | 37.1% | $13,341,000 | 40.7% | $22,000,000 | 60.6% |
10088 South 136th Street | Omaha, NE | 2007/NAP | 58,546 | $605,016 | 15.3% | $4,098,300 | 12.5% | $9,400,000 | 43.6% |
350 International Drive | Mount Olive, NJ | 2017/NAP | 48,300 | $422,638 | 10.7% | $3,843,200 | 11.7% | $8,600,000 | 44.7% |
210 Pierce Road | St. Johnsbury, VT | 2000/NAP | 87,100 | $354,243 | 9.0% | $2,700,000 | 8.2% | $5,300,000 | 50.9% |
815 Industrial Parkway | St. Johnsbury, VT | 1994/NAP | 84,949 | $345,238 | 8.7% | $2,700,000 | 8.2% | $5,100,000 | 52.9% |
11495 Deerfield Road | Cincinnati, OH | 1969/1998 | 97,864 | $300,956 | 7.6% | $2,667,500 | 8.1% | $5,350,000 | 49.9% |
12 Mechanic Street | Groveton, NH | 1967/2015 | 82,862 | $296,579 | 7.5% | $2,100,000 | 6.4% | $4,425,000 | 47.5% |
911 Industrial Parkway | St. Johnsbury, VT | 1985/NAP | 40,800 | $165,240 | 4.2% | $1,300,000 | 4.0% | $2,450,000 | 53.1% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 627,526 | $3,955,602 | 100.0% | $32,750,000 | 100.0% | $62,625,000 | 52.3% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Based on the GNL Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan principal amount outstanding as of the Cut-off Date. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P)(2) | Tenant SF | Approximate % of SF | Annual UW Base Rent | %
of Total Annual UW Base Rent |
Annual UW Base Rent PSF(3) | Lease Expiration |
NSA Industries | NR/NR/NR | 295,711 | 47.1% | $1,356,750 | 30.3% | $4.59 | 10/23/2032(3) |
TREMEC | BB/NR/BB | 127,105 | 20.3% | $1,619,797 | 36.2% | $12.74 | 8/31/2027 |
GKN Aerospace | BBB-/Baa3/BBB- | 97,864 | 15.6% | $376,776 | 8.4% | $3.85 | 12/31/2026 |
Cummins, Inc. | NR/A2/A+ | 58,546 | 9.3% | $658,257 | 14.7% | $11.24 | 5/31/2025 |
Bridgestone Tire | NR/A2/A | 48,300 | 7.7% | $463,197 | 10.4% | $9.59 | 7/31/2027 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 627,526 | 100.0% | $4,474,778 | 100.0% | $7.13 | ||
Vacant Space | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 627,526 | 100.0% | $4,474,778 | 100.0% | $7.13 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease. |
(3) | 82,862 SF of NSA Industries’ space expires on December 31, 2032. |
A-3-89
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 GNL Industrial Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$32,750,000 52.3% 2.76x 12.5% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
2017 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2025 | 1 | 58,546 | 9.3% | 9.3% | $11.24 | $658,257 | 14.7% | 14.7% |
2026 | 1 | 97,864 | 15.6% | 24.9% | $3.85 | $376,776 | 8.4% | 23.1% |
2027 | 2 | 175,405 | 28.0% | 52.9% | $11.88 | $2,082,994 | 46.5% | 69.7% |
2028 & Beyond | 4 | 295,711 | 47.1% | 100.0% | $4.59 | $1,356,750 | 30.3% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 8 | 627,526 | 100.0% | $7.13 | $4,474,778 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
The Market.
The following table presents certain market information relating to the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Market Overview(1) | |||||||
Property Name | Location | Market | Submarket | Estimated 2017 Population(2) | Estimated 2017 Average Household Income(2) | Rental Rate PSF | |
Market(3) | Submarket(3) | ||||||
350 International Drive | Mount Olive, NJ | Northern New Jersey | Morris County | 73,789 | $108,777 | $7.10 | $6.96 |
11495 Deerfield Road | Cincinnati, OH | Greater Cincinnati | Northern Cincinnati | 137,574 | $110,064 | $3.78 | $3.87 |
210 Pierce Road, 815 Industrial Parkway, 911 Industrial Parkway | St. Johnsbury, VT | New Hampshire | I-93/Route 3 | 9,492 | $58,353 | $5.68 | $6.09 |
12 Mechanic Street | Groveton, NH | New Hampshire | I-93/Route 3 | 2,797 | $46,517 | $5.68 | $6.09 |
46643 Ryan Court | Wixom, MI | Detroit | Northwest Suburbs | 115,717 | $105,253 | $6.04 | $7.63 |
10088 South 136th Street | Omaha, NE | Omaha | Sarpy West | 132,643 | $95,306 | $5.57 | $5.73 |
Avg. | $5.64 | $6.06 |
(1) | Information is based on the appraisal and third party market research reports. |
(2) | Information is based on a five-mile radius. |
(3) | Information is based on the appraisals. |
A-3-90
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 11 GNL Industrial Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$32,750,000 52.3% 2.76x 12.5% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis | |||||
2015(1) | 2016(1) | 2017(1) | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | $4,474,778 | $7.13 |
Total Recoveries | N/A | N/A | N/A | $854,302 | $1.36 |
Total Other Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0.00 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss(3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | ($266,454) | ($0.42) |
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | $5,062,626 | $8.07 |
Total Operating Expenses | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$981,519 |
$1.56 |
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | $4,081,107 | $6.50 |
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | N/A | $125,505 | $0.20 |
TI/LC | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$0 |
$0.00 |
Net Cash Flow | N/A | N/A | N/A | $3,955,602 | $6.30 |
Occupancy % | N/A | N/A | N/A | 95.0%(3) | |
NOI DSCR | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.85x | |
NCF DSCR | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.76x | |
NOI Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12.5% | |
NCF Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12.1% |
(1) | Historical financials are unavailable for the GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties, as the GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers recently acquired the properties. The portfolio is comprised of all single tenant properties with NNN leases. |
(2) | UW Gross Potential Rent is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(3) | Vacancy underwritten to 5.0%. The GNL Industrial Portfolio Properties were 100.0% occupied as of February 1, 2018. |
Substitution. The GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers have the right to substitute properties in order to cure certain cash flow sweep trigger events, defaults or events of default, or if the GNL Industrial Portfolio Borrowers anticipate the occurrence of such cash flow sweep trigger events or defaults or events of default. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Releases; Partial Releases”.
A-3-91
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 BlueLinx Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$28,600,000 64.2% 2.46x 12.1% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller(1): | Société Générale | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Portfolio | ||||
Original Balance(2): | $28,600,000 | Location: | Various | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance(2): | $28,600,000 | General Property Type: | Industrial | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 2.7% | Detailed Property Type: | Warehouse/Distribution | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsors: |
Michael W. Brennan; Scott D. McKibben; Samuel A. Mandarino; Robert G. Vanecko; Eduardo E. Paneque; Allen Crosswell; Greenwood Holding Company, LLC; William T. MacMane; Brad O’Halloran |
Year Built/Renovated: | Various | ||||
Size: | 2,307,835 SF | ||||||
Cut-off Date Balance per SF(2): | $31 | ||||||
Maturity Date Balance per SF(2): | $31 | ||||||
Property Manager: |
Brennan Management, LLC (borrower-related) | ||||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.4700% | ||||||
Note Date: | 1/10/2018 | ||||||
First Payment Date: | 3/6/2018 | ||||||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2023 | ||||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 60 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 60 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | UW NOI: | $8,650,101 | ||||
Prepayment Provisions(3): | LO (24); DEF (32); O (4) | UW NOI Debt Yield(2): | 12.1% | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status: | Springing/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity(2): | 12.1% | ||||
Additional Debt Type(2): | Pari Passu | UW NCF DSCR(2): | 2.46x | ||||
Additional Debt Balance(2): | $42,900,000 | Most Recent NOI(4): | N/A | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 2nd Most Recent NOI(4): | N/A | ||||
Reserves | 3rd Most Recent NOI(4): | N/A | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent Occupancy: | 100.0% (2/1/2018) | ||
RE Tax(5): | $0 | Springing | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy(4): | N/A | ||
Insurance(5): | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy(4): | N/A | ||
Replacement Reserve(5): | $0 | Springing | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $111,450,000 (Various) | ||
TI/LC(6): | $0 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2): | 64.2% | ||
Other Reserve(7): | $213,750 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio(2): | 64.2% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount(2): | $71,500,000 | 63.0% | Purchase Price: | $110,000,000 | 96.9% | |
Sponsor Equity: | 39,395,248 | 34.7 | Closing Costs: | 3,362,861 | 3.0 | |
Other Sources(8): | 2,681,362 | 2.4 | Reserves: | 213,750 | 0.2 | |
Total Sources: | $113,576,611 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $113,576,611 | 100.0% |
(1) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan (as defined below) was co-originated by Société Générale and Citi Real Estate Funding Inc (“CREFI”). |
(2) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Mortgage Loan (as defined below) is part of the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan, which is comprised of four pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate principal balance of $71,500,000. The Cut-off Date Balance per SF, Maturity Date Balance per SF, UW NOI Debt Yield, UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity, UW NCF DSCR, Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio numbers presented above are based on the aggregate principal balance of the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan. |
(3) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan lockout period is required to be at least 24 payments beginning with and including the first payment date of March 6, 2018. Defeasance of the full $71,500,000 whole loan is permitted at any time after the earlier to occur of (i) two years after the closing date of the securitization that includes the last promissory note to be securitized and (ii) three years from January 10, 2018. The assumed lockout period of 24 months is based on the expected closing date of the UBS 2018-C8 securitization in February 2018. The actual lockout period may be longer. |
(4) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Properties (as defined below) were acquired in January 2018 and as such, the most recent, 2nd and 3rd Most Recent NOI and 2nd and 3rd Most Recent Occupancy are unavailable. |
(5) | The requirement to make monthly deposits for taxes, insurance and replacement reserves is provisionally waived so long as the BlueLinx Portfolio Borrowers (as defined below) delivers evidence to the lender that (i) no trigger period under the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan documents has occurred and is continuing, (ii) certain tenant leases are in full force and effect, and (iii) with respect to (a) taxes, the applicable tenant is obligated pursuant to its lease to pay for all taxes imposed against the applicable BlueLinx Portfolio Property, (b) insurance, the applicable tenant is obligated pursuant to its lease to pay for all insurance premiums for the insurance required for the applicable BlueLinx Portfolio Property pursuant to the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan documents and (c) replacement reserves, certain tenants at the applicable BlueLinx Portfolio Properties are obligated to make the replacements for which the replacement reserves are intended and evidence that such replacement have been completed is delivered to the lender. |
(6) | During the continuance of a trigger period under the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan documents, the BlueLinx Portfolio Borrowers are required to deposit $28,662 for TI/LC reserves on each monthly payment date. |
(7) | The Other Reserve consists of $206,875, which represents 125% of the estimated costs for various outstanding environmental and zoning compliance items across the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties and $6,875, which represents 125% of the estimated costs for immediate repairs. |
(8) | Other Sources consists of security ($1,604,167), rent ($569,220), real estate tax ($447,000) and insurance ($60,975) deposits that were credited to the BlueLinx Portfolio Borrowers on the date of the acquisition. |
A-3-92
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 BlueLinx Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$28,600,000 64.2% 2.46x 12.1% |
The Mortgage Loan. The twelfth largest mortgage loan (the “BlueLinx Portfolio Mortgage Loan”) is part of a whole loan (the “BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan”) evidenced by four pari passu promissory notes with an aggregate original principal amount of $71,500,000. The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan is secured by the fee interests in four industrial warehouse/distribution properties totaling 2,307,835 SF and located in Maryland, Massachusetts, Georgia and North Carolina (the “BlueLinx Portfolio Properties”). Promissory Note A-3 and Note A-4, with an original principal balance of $28,600,000, represents the BlueLinx Portfolio Mortgage Loan and will be included in the UBS 2018-C8 Trust. The remaining two pari passu notes, with an aggregate original principal balance of $42,900,000 (collectively, the “BlueLinx Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans”), are expected to be contributed to the BMARK 2018-B2 Trust. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Whole Loans—The Non-Serviced fPari Passu Whole Loans” and “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”.
BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan Summary | ||||
Note | Original Balance | Cut-off Date Balance | Anticipated Note Holder | Controlling Piece |
A-1 | $30,000,000 | $30,000,000 | BMARK 2018-B2 | Yes |
A-2 | $12,900,000 | $12,900,000 | BMARK 2018-B2 | No |
A-3 | $18,600,000 | $18,600,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
A-4 | $10,000,000 | $10,000,000 | UBS 2018-C8 | No |
Total | $71,500,000 | $71,500,000 |
The Borrowers and the Borrower Sponsors. The borrowing entities for the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan are BIP Frederick, LLC, BIP Bellingham, LLC, BIP Lawrenceville, LLC, and BIP Butner, LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and special purpose entity (“BlueLinx Portfolio Borrowers”). The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole loan is structured to be Shari’ah compliant and to facilitate such compliance, the BlueLinx Portfolio Borrowers have entered into a master lease with four master lessees, all of whom have subleased their interests to an operating tenant pursuant to an operating lease. The operating lease passes through all of the rights and obligations with respect to the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties and the tenant leases to the master lessee, and the master lessees pay rent under the master lease to the BlueLinx Portfolio Borrowers in an aggregate amount equal to the debt service under the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan and other required payments under the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan documents. The master lease also provides that the master lessees operate and maintain the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties and include certain prohibitions on transfers, leasing, alterations, among others, on terms that replicate the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Shari’ah Compliant Loan”.
The BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan’s borrower sponsors and nonrecourse carve-out guarantors are Michael W. Brennan, Scott D. McKibben, Samuel A. Mandarino, Robert G. Vanecko, Eduardo E. Paneque, Allen Crosswell, Greenwood Holding Company, LLC, William T. MacMane and Brad O’Halloran. All carve-out guarantors are principals and/or employees of Brennan Investment Group. Brennan Investment Group, an industrial property owner that operates a national portfolio spanning across 25 states and totaling more than 35.0 million SF.
The Properties. The BlueLinx Portfolio Properties are 100.0% leased to BlueLinx Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of BlueLinx Holdings, Inc. (“BlueLinx”) and are comprised of 2,307,835 SF of industrial distribution warehouse space across four locations in Maryland, Massachusetts, Georgia and North Carolina. The BlueLinx Portfolio Properties located in Frederick, Maryland, Lawrenceville, Georgia and Butner, North Carolina (“BlueLinx Frederick”, “BlueLinx Lawrenceville” and “BlueLinx Butner”, respectively) were each built in 1996. The BlueLinx Portfolio Property located in Bellingham, Massachusetts (“BlueLinx Bellingham”, together with BlueLinx Frederick, BlueLinx Lawrenceville and BlueLinx Butner, the “BlueLinx Portfolio Properties”) was built in 1988 and renovated in 2006.
The following table describes each property comprising the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties by descending allocated Cut-off Date Balance.
Portfolio Summary | |||||||
Property Name | Location | Net Rentable Area (SF)(1) | Year Built/ Renovated |
Allocated Loan Amount(2) | % of Allocated Loan Amount | Appraised Value | % of Appraised Value |
BlueLinx Frederick | Frederick, MD | 680,252 | 1996/N/A | $24,700,000 | 34.5% | $38,000,000 | 34.1% |
BlueLinx Bellingham | Bellingham, MA | 489,950 | 1988/2006 | 23,318,750 | 32.6% | 36,900,000 | 33.1% |
BlueLinx Lawrenceville | Lawrenceville, GA | 585,637 | 1996/N/A | 14,300,000 | 20.0% | 22,400,000 | 20.1% |
BlueLinx Butner | Butner, NC | 551,996 | 1996/N/A | 9,181,250 | 12.8% | 14,150,000 | 12.7% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 2,307,835 | $71,500,000 | 100.0% | $111,450,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Based on the allocated BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan amount. |
The largest of the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties by allocated loan amount, BlueLinx Frederick, is a 680,252 SF industrial distribution warehouse located at 4300 Georgia Pacific Boulevard in Frederick, Maryland. BlueLinx Frederick is located in Frederick County, approximately 53 miles west of Baltimore and 48 miles north of Washington, D.C. Built in 1996, the BlueLinx Frederick property, which consists of one single story warehouse building and 953 SF of office space along with an internal rail offloading bay, is situated on 54.0 acres of land. BlueLinx Frederick offers 206 surface parking spaces, yielding a parking ratio of 0.30 spaces per 1,000 SF. Additionally, BlueLinx Frederick has six loading docks, 30 drive-in docks, 12 interior garage doors, and up to 30-foot ceilings. BlueLinx Frederick is 100.0% leased to BlueLinx Corporation under a 15-year absolute net lease through December 2032 with a base rental rate of $4.89 PSF. The tenant has two, five-year renewal options, exercisable with 12 months’ notice, with 2.5% annual increases beginning on the first day of the second year of each renewal term. The tenant has subleased approximately 100,000 SF to Carter-Jones Lumber Company, a building materials retailer with 146 locations across 12 states. The base rent for the sublease is $5.20 PSF. The subtenant has exercised its renewal option with a current lease term expiring on June 30, 2024. The subtenant has two, six-year renewal options remaining.
The second largest of the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties by allocated loan amount, BlueLinx Bellingham, is a 489,950 SF industrial distribution warehouse located at 419 Maple Street in Bellingham, Massachusetts. BlueLinx Bellingham is located in Norfolk County, within the Interstate 495 South section of
A-3-93
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 BlueLinx Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$28,600,000 64.2% 2.46x 12.1% |
the greater Boston market area, approximately two miles east of downtown Bellingham. Built in 1988 and renovated in 2006, BlueLinx Bellingham consists of two two-story warehouse buildings that include office space, internal rail access, storage space and covered canopies. The two buildings contain approximately 465,453 SF of industrial space (95.0% of NRA) and 24,498 SF of office space (5.0% of NRA). BlueLinx Bellingham offers 164 surface parking spaces and yields a parking ratio of 0.33 spaces per 1,000 SF. BlueLinx Bellingham has 6 loading docks, 16 drive-in docks and a ceiling height of 36 feet. BlueLinx Bellingham is 100.0% leased to BlueLinx Corporation, under a 15-year absolute net lease through December 2032. The tenant, BlueLinx Corporation, has a base rental rate of $6.41 PSF and two, five-year renewal options, exercisable with 12 months’ notice, with 2.5% annual increases beginning on the first day of the second year of such renewal term.
The third largest of the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties by allocated loan amount, BlueLinx Lawrenceville, is a 585,637 SF industrial distribution warehouse located at 200 Hosea Road in Lawrenceville, Georgia. The building contains approximately 570,996 SF of industrial space (97.5% of NRA) and 14,641 SF of office space (2.5% of NRA). BlueLinx Lawrenceville is located in Gwinnett County, within the Interstate 85 North East section of the Atlanta market, approximately 1.7 miles northeast of downtown Lawrenceville and 33.2 miles northeast of downtown Atlanta. Built in 1996, BlueLinx Lawrenceville consists of a single-story warehouse building that includes office and warehouse space, 22 open storage structures and external CSX railroad access situated on 64.7 acres of land. BlueLinx Lawrenceville offers 328 surface parking spaces, which yields a parking ratio of 0.56 spaces per 1,000 SF. BlueLinx Lawrenceville has 8 loading docks and a ceiling height of 28 feet. The BlueLinx Lawrenceville property is 100.0% leased to BlueLinx Corporation under a 15-year, absolute net lease through December 2032 with a base rental rate of $3.29 PSF. The tenant has two, five-year renewal options, exercisable with 12 months’ notice, with 2.5% annual increases beginning on the first day of the second year of each renewal term.
The fourth largest of the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties by allocated loan amount, BlueLinx Butner, is a 551,996 SF industrial distribution warehouse located at 1712 East D Street in Butner, North Carolina. BlueLinx Butner contains 541,508 SF of industrial space (98.1% of NRA) and 10,488 SF of office space (1.9% of NRA). BlueLinx Butner is located in Granville County on the east side of East D Street, approximately 17 miles northeast of Durham and 30 miles north of Raleigh. Built in 1996, BlueLinx Butner consists of ten single-story buildings including one warehouse with office space, one distribution building, and eight open pole barns situated on 55.0 acres of land. BlueLinx Butner offers 212 surface parking spaces and yields a parking ratio of 0.38 spaces per 1,000 SF. BlueLinx Butner has 5 loading docks, 17 drive-in docks, and ceiling heights of 30 feet for the distribution and warehouse buildings and 24 feet for the eight open pole barns. BlueLinx Butner is 100.0% leased to BlueLinx Corporation under a 15-year lease through December 2032 with a base rental rate of $2.24 PSF. The tenant has two, five-year renewal options, exercisable with 12 months’ notice, with 2.5% annual increases beginning on the first day of the second year of each renewal term. BlueLinx Corporation has subleased approximately 104,000 SF to Cormetech, Inc., a manufacturer of high-quality environmental catalysts and a service provider for power, marine, industrial, refinery, and petrochemical markets. The sub-tenant has exercised a five-year renewal option with a current lease term expiring in November 2021.
Major Tenant.
BlueLinx Corporation (2,307,835 SF, 100.0% of NRA, 100.0% of underwritten base rent). The BlueLinx Portfolio Properties are 100.0% leased to BlueLinx Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of BlueLinx Holdings, Inc. (“BlueLinx”). BlueLinx is a U.S. distributor of building and industrial products that operates through BlueLinx Corporation. Headquartered in Atlanta, GA, BlueLinx is a Fortune 1000 company that employs approximately 1,600 people and offers a wide variety of products to service customers nationwide, including dealers, industrial manufacturers, manufactured housing producers and home improvement retailers. BlueLinx also provides a range of services and solutions, such as intermodal distribution services, inventory stocking and backhaul service. BlueLinx operates their distribution business through a network of 39 distribution centers located across the United States.
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties:
Tenant Summary(1) | ||||||||
Tenant Name | Property | Credit Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/ S&P) | Tenant SF | Approximate % of SF | Annual UW Base Rent | %
of Total Annual UW Base Rent |
Annual UW Base Rent PSF(3) | Lease Expiration |
BlueLinx Corporation(2) | BlueLinx Frederick | NR/NR/NR | 680,252 | 29.5% | $3,325,000 | 34.5% | $4.89 | 12/31/2032 |
BlueLinx Corporation | BlueLinx Bellingham | NR/NR/NR | 489,950 | 21.2% | $3,139,062 | 32.6% | $6.41 | 12/31/2032 |
BlueLinx Corporation | BlueLinx Lawrenceville | NR/NR/NR | 585,637 | 25.4% | $1,925,000 | 20.0% | $3.29 | 12/31/2032 |
BlueLinx Corporation(3) | BlueLinx Butner | NR/NR/NR | 551,996 | 23.9% | $1,235,940 | 12.8% | $2.24 | 12/31/2032 |
Subtotal/Wtd. Avg. | 2,307,835 | 100.0% | $9,625,002 | 100.0% | $4.17 | |||
Vacant Space | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | |||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 2,307,835 | 100.0% | $9,625,002 | 100.0% | $4.17 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | The BlueLinx Corporation tenant at the Frederick property currently subleases 100,000 SF to Carter-Jones Lumber Company through June 2024. |
(3) | The BlueLinx Corporation tenant at the Butner property currently subleases 104,000 SF to Cormetech, Inc. through November 2021. |
A-3-94
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 BlueLinx Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$28,600,000 64.2% 2.46x 12.1% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2027 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2028 & Beyond | 4 | 2,307,835 | 100.0% | 100.0% | $4.17 | $9,625,002 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 4 | 2,307,835 | 100.0% | $4.17 | $9,625,002 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
The Market. BlueLinx Frederick is located at 4300 Georgia Pacific Boulevard in Frederick, Maryland and located within the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metropolitan statistical area (“Washington MSA”). According to the appraisal, the average and median annual household incomes within the Washington MSA are $130,617 and $95,941, respectively, and the estimated 2017 populations for the Washington MSA and Frederick County were approximately 6.2 million and 249,700, respectively. The Frederick industrial submarket has approximately 5.9 million of Class A/B industrial space with an overall vacancy rate of 11.0% and direct asking rent of $6.31 PSF on a triple net basis. Underwritten annual base rent PSF at the BlueLinx Frederick property is $4.89 PSF.
BlueLinx Bellingham is located at 419 Maple Street in Bellingham, Massachusetts and located within the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Massachusetts-New Hampshire metropolitan statistical area (“Boston MSA”) with close proximity to Interstate 495 and State Route’s 140 and 126. According to the appraisal, the average and median annual household incomes within the Boston MSA are $108,776 and $76,510, respectively, and the estimated 2017 populations for the Boston MSA and Norfolk County were approximately 4.8 million and 700,000, respectively. The Boston industrial market has approximately 131.6 million SF of industrial space with a direct vacancy rate of 5.9% and direct asking rent of $6.37 PSF on a triple net basis for warehouse-distribution space. Underwritten annual base rent PSF at BlueLinx Bellingham is $6.41 PSF.
BlueLinx Lawrenceville is located at 200 Hosea Road in Lawrenceville, Georgia and located within the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta core based statistical area (“Atlanta CBSA”). According to the appraisal, the average and median annual household incomes within the Atlanta CBSA are $83,723 and $58,509, respectively, and the estimated 2017 populations for the Atlanta CBSA and Gwinnett County were approximately 5.9 million and 927,000, respectively. The Atlanta industrial market has approximately 489.5 million SF of industrial warehouse and distribution space with a direct vacancy rate of 7.9% and direct asking rent of $3.84 PSF on a triple net basis for the third quarter of 2017. Underwritten annual base rent PSF at the BlueLinx Lawrenceville property is $3.29 PSF.
BlueLinx Butner is located at 1712 East D Street in Butner, North Carolina and located within the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill core based statistical area (“Raleigh CBSA”). According to the appraisal, the average and median annual household incomes within the Raleigh CBSA are $84,056 and $59,114, respectively, and the estimated 2017 populations for the Raleigh CBSA and Granville County were approximately 2.2 million and 59,600, respectively. The Granville and Franklin counties industrial market has approximately 8.9 million SF of industrial space with a direct vacancy rate of 8.1% and average asking rents of $3.91 PSF on a triple net basis over the past five years. Underwritten annual base rent PSF at BlueLinx Butner is $2.24 PSF.
A-3-95
Various | Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 12 BlueLinx Portfolio |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$28,600,000 64.2% 2.46x 12.1% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the BlueLinx Portfolio Properties:
Cash Flow Analysis | |||||
2015(1) | 2016(1) | 2017(1) | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent | N/A | N/A | N/A | $9,625,002 | $4.17 |
Total Recoveries | N/A | N/A | N/A | $3,373,690 | $1.46 |
Total Other Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0.00 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss(2) | N/A |
N/A | N/A | ($974,902) |
($0.42) |
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | $12,023,790 | $5.21 |
Total Operating Expenses | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$3,373,690 |
$1.46 |
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | $8,650,101 | $3.75 |
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | N/A | $346,175 | $0.15 |
TI/LC | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$343,946 |
$0.15 |
Net Cash Flow | N/A | N/A | N/A | $7,959,979 | $3.45 |
Occupancy %(2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 92.5% | |
NOI DSCR(3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.67x | |
NCF DSCR(3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.46x | |
NOI Debt Yield(3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12.1% | |
NCF Debt Yield(3) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11.1% |
(1) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Properties were acquired in January 2018 and as such, historical financial information is unavailable. |
(2) | The BlueLinx Portfolio Properties are 100.0% occupied as of February 1, 2018. However, vacancy was underwritten to 7.5%. |
(3) | Debt service coverage ratios and debt yields are based on the BlueLinx Portfolio Whole Loan. |
A-3-96
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-97
2299 West Obispo Avenue Gilbert, AZ 85233 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 13 El Dorado Tech Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$25,350,000 60.6% 1.88x 9.6% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Ladder Capital Finance LLC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance: | $25,350,000 | Location: | Gilbert, AZ 85233 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $25,350,000 | General Property Type: | Office | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 2.4% | Detailed Property Type: | Suburban | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | Mazher Papar | Year Built/Renovated: | 1998/2017 | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.5410% | Size: | 180,480 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 1/17/2018 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF: | $140 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 3/6/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF: | $140 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 2/6/2028 | Property Manager: | Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc. | ||||
Original Term: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 0 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 120 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Seasoning: | 0 months | UW NOI: | $2,422,832 | ||||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (24); DEF (92); (O(4) | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 9.6% | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status(1): | Hard/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 9.6% | ||||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.88x | ||||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | 2nd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||||
Reserves(2) | 3rd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent Occupancy: | 100.0% (2/1/2018) | ||
RE Tax: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy(3): | N/A | ||
Insurance: | $7,528 | $2,509 | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy(3): | N/A | ||
Replacements: | $0 | $0 | N/A | Appraised Value (as of): | $41,850,000 (12/4/2017) | ||
TI/LC: | $9,143,376 | Springing | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 60.6% | ||
HVAC Holdback: | $146,005 | Springing | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 60.6% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $25,350,000 | 51.8% | Purchase Price: | $39,000,000 | 79.6% | |
Borrower Equity: | $14,324,832 | 29.3% | Reserves: | $9,296,908 | 19.0% | |
Seller Credits(4): | $9,289,387 | 19.0% | Closing Costs: | $667,310 | 1.4% | |
Total Sources: | $48,964,218 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $48,964,218 | 100.0% |
(1) | Cash Management will be required upon a “Cash Management Trigger Event”, which will occur (i) upon an event of default, (ii) when the net cash flow debt service coverage ratio of the El Dorado Tech Center Property (as defined below) falls below 1.10x, (iii) when a significant tenant (i.e., a tenant representing greater than 25% of the El Dorado Tech Center Property on a physical or economic basis) ceases to conduct, or gives notice of its intent to cease to conduct its normal business operations for an amount of its space that would result in occupancy of less than 75% of leased square footage, (iv) when any significant tenant (or parent, if applicable) becomes insolvent, files for bankruptcy, or has its senior unsecured debt rating fall below B- (or equivalent), and/or (v) 18 months prior to lease expiration of a significant tenant (unless such significant tenant has given notice of the extension or renewal of its lease, or a lease with a suitable replacement tenant for such significant tenant has been executed). The GoDaddy.com, LLC (“GoDaddy”) lease provides for 9 months’ notice for extension (March 31, 2027), which means, unless an early extension is agreed to, a cash flow sweep will commence 9 months prior to the notice date (June 30, 2026). |
(2) | Monthly escrows are waived for real estate taxes, provided that (i) there has been no event of default, (ii) the lease with GoDaddy remains in full force and effect, and (iii) GoDaddy maintains a senior unsecured debt rating of at least “B” by S&P or an equivalent rating by another rating agency. |
(3) | Historical financials and occupancy are not available as the El Dorado Tech Center Property was recently acquired. |
(4) | The borrower was provided $9,289,387 in seller credits at origination for TI/LC, signage, and HVAC. |
The Mortgage Loan. The thirteenth largest mortgage loan (the “El Dorado Tech Center Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a promissory note with an original principal balance of $25,350,000. The El Dorado Mortgage Loan is secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering an 180,480 SF office property located in Gilbert, Arizona (the “El Dorado Tech Center Property”). The proceeds of the El Dorado Tech Center Mortgage Loan along with equity contributions from the El Dorado Tech Center Borrower (as defined below) were used to acquire the El Dorado Tech Center Property and fund reserves and closing costs.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is El Dorado Operating Company LLC (the “El Dorado Tech Center Borrower”), a single-purpose Delaware limited liability company with two independent directors. Mazher Papar serves as the borrower sponsor. Mazher Papar is a principal of BMA International, which is a privately held retail operating company headquartered in Dubai with over 300 retail stores across 7 countries. BMA International has over 8,500 employees with a total portfolio value of approximately $1 billion. BMA International has been managed jointly by Mazher Papar and Mohammed Ayub Shaikh since 1996. The El Dorado Tech Center Mortgage Loan is not structured with a warm-body/ warm-entity carveout guarantor. The El Dorado Tech Center Borrower is the sole party liable for any breach or violation of the non-recourse provisions in the loan agreement.
The Property. The El Dorado Tech Center Property is located at 2299 West Obispo Avenue in Gilbert, Arizona. The El Dorado Tech Center Property consists of one building totaling 180,480 SF on a 14.6-acre site. Built in 1998 and renovated in 2017, the El Dorado Tech Center Property has a single-tenant design and is currently occupied by GoDaddy which has been at the El Dorado Tech Center Property since 2005 and signed an 11-year lease extension and with an expansion of its space that began in January 2017. According to the borrower sponsor, the El Dorado Tech Center Property has
A-3-98
2299 West Obispo Avenue Gilbert, AZ 85233 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 13 El Dorado Tech Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$25,350,000 60.6% 1.88x 9.6% |
undergone approximately $3.2 million in tenant improvements and capital expenditures over the last three years and will receive an additional $16.6 million over the next several years with the landlord contributing approximately $11.6 million and the tenant investing approximately $5 million of its own capital. There are 1,077 parking spaces at the El Dorado Tech Center Property, which equates to a parking ratio of approximately 6.0 spaces per 1,000 SF. As of February 1, 2018, the El Dorado Tech Center Property is 100.0% leased to GoDaddy, which is the largest cloud platform dedicated to small, independent ventures. GoDaddy has over 17 million customers worldwide and 73 million domain names under management.
The following table presents certain information relating to the sole tenant at the El Dorado Tech Center Property:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit
Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P) (2) |
Tenant SF | Approximate % of SF | Annual UW Base Rent | %
of Total Annual UW Base Rent |
Annual UW Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration |
GoDaddy | NR/Ba3/BB- | 180,480 | 100.0% | $2,616,960 | 100.0% | $14.50 | 12/31/2027(3) |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 180,480 | 100.0% | $2,616,960 | 100.0% | $14.50 |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
(2) | Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease. |
(3) | The lease is structured with two 5-year extension options at 95% of fair market rent. Nine months’ notice is required prior to exercising either extension option. |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the El Dorado Tech Center Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling | Total UW Base Rent Rolling | Approx. % of Total Base Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Base Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2023 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2027 | 1 | 180,480 | 100.0% | 100.0% | $14.50 | $2,616,960 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
2028 & Beyond | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 1 | 180,480 | 100.0% | $14.50 | $2,616,960 | 100.0% |
(1) | Information is based on the underwritten rent roll. |
The Market. The El Dorado Tech Center Property is located in Gilbert, Arizona, approximately 18.3 miles southeast of Phoenix and 13.8 miles northwest of the Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport. Access to the El Dorado Tech Center Property is provided by W Obispo Avenue and exposure to N Arizona Avenue, which a daily traffic count of approximately 22,826 vehicles pass per day according to a third party market research report. The El Dorado Tech Center Property is also approximately 7.4 miles east of I-10 and 1.8 miles south of US 60. According to the appraisal, the estimated 2017 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the El Dorado Tech Center Property was 12,834, 147,711, and 433,859, respectively, while the estimated 2017 average household income within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the El Dorado Tech Center Property was $84,962, $71,917 and $72,787, respectively.
The El Dorado Tech Center Property is located in the Chandler office submarket, which is part of the larger Phoenix office market. According to the appraisal, as of the third quarter of 2017, the submarket reported total inventory of 175.5 million SF with a 14.9% vacancy rate. Since 2016, there has been approximately 3.5 million SF of positive net absorption. The appraiser concluded a market rent of $18.00 PSF NNN which is approximately 24.1% higher than the $14.50 PSF NNN rent that was underwritten for GoDaddy.
A-3-99
2299 West Obispo Avenue Gilbert, AZ 85233 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 13 El Dorado Tech Center |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$25,350,000 60.6% 1.88x 9.6% |
The following table presents recent leasing data at competitive office properties with respect to the El Dorado Tech Center Property:
Competitive Office Lease Summary | ||||||||
Property Name | Year Built | Tenant Name | Lease Size (SF) | Lease Date | Lease Term (Yrs.) | Initial Rent PSF | Lease Type | |
El Dorado Tech Center Property | 1998 | GoDaddy | 180,480 | January 2017 | 11.0 | $14.00 | NNN | |
Continuum | 1986 | Wells Fargo | 36,348 | October 2017 | 9.0 | $21.00 | Gross | |
Walgreens Building | 1996 | Walgreens | 133,503 | June 2017 | NAV | $15.75 | NNN | |
Liberty Center III | 2016 | Carvana | 48,352 | April 2017 | 7.0 | $18.35 | NNN | |
Liberty Center | 2016 | Centene | 55,242 | January 2017 | 10.0 | $19.47 | NNN | |
Papago Park Center | 1999 | Willis Towers | 45,181 | July 2016 | 11.0 | $17.00 | NNN | |
Source: Appraisal
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the El Dorado Tech Center Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014(1) | 2015(1) | 2016(1) | TTM(1) | UW | UW PSF | |
Gross Potential Rent(2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $2,616,960 | $14.50 |
Total Recoveries | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $1,265,597 | $7.01 |
Total Other Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0.00 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
($194,128) |
($1.08) |
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $3,688,429 | $20.44 |
Total Operating Expenses | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$1,265,597 |
$7.01 |
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $2,422,832 | $13.42 |
TI/LC | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $180,480 | $1.00 |
Capital Expenditures | N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
$45,120 |
$0.25 |
Net Cash Flow | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | $2,197,232 | $12.17 |
Occupancy % | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 95.0%(2) | |
NOI DSCR | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2.08x | |
NCF DSCR | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.88x | |
NOI Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9.6% | |
NCF Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8.7% |
(1) | Historical financials are not available as the El Dorado Tech Center Property was recently acquired. The lease at the El Dorado Tech Center Property is structured as a triple net lease. |
(2) | Physical Occupancy as of February 1, 2017 is 100.0%. UW Occupancy % represents economic occupancy. |
A-3-100
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-101
1115 Paul Martin Drive Edgewood, MD 21040 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Harford Village MHC |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$23,500,000 65.5% 1.25x 7.8% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | Ladder Capital Finance LLC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance: | $23,500,000 | Location: | Edgewood, MD 21040 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $23,500,000 | General Property Type: | Manufactured Housing Community | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 2.2% | Detailed Property Type: | Manufactured Housing Community | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Acquisition | Title Vesting: | Fee Simple | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | Ross H. Partrich | Year Built/Renovated: | 1974/N/A | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.5650% | Size: | 482 Pads | ||||
Note Date: | 12/7/2017 | Cut-off Date Balance per Pad: | $48,755 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 2/6/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per Pad: | $43,719 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 1/6/2028 | Property Manager: |
Newbury Management Company (borrower-related) | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 360 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 48 months | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Seasoning: | 1 month | UW NOI(4): | $1,823,942 | ||||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (25); DEF (91); O (4) | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 7.8% | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status(1): | Springing/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 8.7% | ||||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 1.65x (IO) 1.25x (P&I) | ||||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | Most Recent NOI(4): | $1,632,532 (10/31/2017 TTM) | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type)(2): | Yes (Mezzanine) | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $1,548,454 (12/31/2016) | ||||
Reserves | 3rd Most Recent NOI: | $1,512,359 (12/31/2015) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | Most Recent Occupancy: | 91.1% (10/31/2017) | ||
RE Tax: | $94,286 | $13,469 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 90.0% (12/31/2016) | ||
Insurance: | $0 | Springing | N/A | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | 90.1% (12/31/2015) | ||
Capex Reserves: | $0 | $2,008 | $96,400 | Appraised Value (as of): | $35,860,000 (10/24/2017) | ||
Environmental Reserve(3): | $58,764 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 65.5% | ||
Utility Submeter Reserve: | $185,570 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 58.8% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $23,500,000 | 73.8% | Purchase Price: | $31,000,000 | 97.4% | |
Borrower Equity | $8,340,516 | 26.2% | Closing Costs: | $596,182 | 1.9% | |
Reserves(3): | $244,334 | 0.8% | ||||
Total Sources: | $31,840,516 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $31,840,516 | 100.0% |
(1) | Cash Management will be required upon a “Cash Management Trigger Event”, which will occur upon (i) an event of default occurs under the Harford Village MHC Mortgage Loan (as defined below) or the property management agreement and/or (ii) the debt service coverage ratio for the Harford Village MHC Property (as defined below) falls below 1.05x as of the end of any two consecutive calendar quarters. |
(2) | Mezzanine debt is permitted if, among other conditions, (a) the combined loan-to-value ratio is not greater than the lesser of 75.0% and the related loan-to-value ratio at origination (65.5%), (b) the combined debt service coverage ratio must be at least equal to the greater of 1.25x and the related debt service coverage ratio at origination (1.65x), and (c) rating agency confirmation is obtained with respect to the UBS 2018-C8 certificates (but only if required under the UBS 2018-C8 pooling and servicing agreement). |
(3) | The environmental reserve is held with First American Title Insurance Company. |
(4) | See “Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow” below. |
The Mortgage Loan. The fourteenth largest mortgage loan (the “Harford Village MHC Mortgage Loan”) is evidenced by a promissory note with an original principal balance of $23,500,000. The Harford Village MHC Mortgage Loan is secured by a first priority mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee simple interest in a 482-pad, manufactured housing community property located in Edgewood, Maryland (the “Harford Village MHC Property”). The proceeds of the Harford Village MHC Mortgage Loan along with borrower equity were primarily used to acquire the Harford Village MHC Property, fund reserves, and pay closing costs.
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is Harford Village MHC, LLC, a single-purpose Delaware limited liability company. The borrower sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor is Ross H. Partrich, who is the key principal of RHP Properties (“RHP”). Mr. Partrich owns and manages a total of 233 manufactured housing communities with over 58,602 housing units and sites spanning 23 states, with a combined value of approximately $3.52 billion. RHP employs more than 900 professionals at their Farmington Hills, Michigan corporate headquarters, regional offices, and on-site management properties across the country. RHP is the largest private owner of manufactured home communities in the country.
A-3-102
1115 Paul Martin Drive Edgewood, MD 21040 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Harford Village MHC |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$23,500,000 65.5% 1.25x 7.8% |
The Property. The Harford Village MHC Property consists of a 482 pad manufactured housing community located on a 76.5-acre site. The Harford Village MHC Property is located in Harford County, approximately 20 miles northeast of downtown Baltimore. The Harford Village MHC Property amenities include a clubhouse, a pool, and a playground. The Harford Village MHC Property also has 989 parking spaces, providing a total of 2.1 parking spaces/pad.
The Market. The Harford Village MHC Property is located within Harford County, located approximately 20 miles northeast of downtown Baltimore in a predominately suburban area filled with single family homes. The Harford Village MHC Property is located just north of several large industrial parks. The Harford Village MHC Property is located 0.7 miles from Lakeside Business Park, which was 100% leased with a total of 1.0 million net rentable square feet according to the appraisal.
According to the appraisal, the Harford Village MHC Property is located within the Baltimore-Columbia-Townson metropolitan market. As of fourth quarter 2017, the weighted average pad rental rate of comparable manufactured housing communities in the market was $583 per month, approximately 26.7% above the weighted average unit rental rate at the Harford Village MHC Property of $460 per month. According to the appraisal, the estimated 2016 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Harford Village MHC Property was 8,807, 50,963, 90,301 respectively, and the 2016 estimated average household income within the same one-, three-, and five-mile radius is $58,436, $81,270, $94,670, respectively.
Comparable rental properties to the Harford Village MHC Property are shown in the table below:
Competitive Property Summary(1) | |||||
Property Name/Location | Year Built | Distance to Subject | Number of Units (Pads) | Property Occupancy | Avg. Monthly Rent per Pad |
Harford Village MHC Property 1115 Paul Martin Drive Edgewood, MD |
1974 | -- | 482 | 91.1%(2) | $460 |
Reeds at Bayview 3001 Pulaski Hwy Edgewood, MD |
1940 | 3.5 miles | 97 | 98.0% | $552 |
Magnolia Estates MHP 1213 Hanson Road Edgewood, MD |
1970 | 1.1 miles | 115 | 85.0% | $528 |
Edgebrook MHP 2611 Willoughby Beach Road Edgewood, MD |
1969 | 2.0 miles | 50 | 82.0% | $518 |
Beechwood MHC 400 Abingdon Rd Abingdon, MD |
1970 | 3.8 miles | 80 | 96.0% | $477 |
Bush River Manor Forest Greens Road Aberdeen, MD |
1987 | 5.0 miles | 182 | 98.0% | $465 |
(1) | Source: Appraisal unless otherwise indicated. |
(2) | Information obtained from the borrower rent roll. |
A-3-103
1115 Paul Martin Drive Edgewood, MD 21040 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 14 Harford Village MHC |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$23,500,000 65.5% 1.25x 7.8% |
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Harford Village MHC Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 10/31/2017 TTM(1) | UW(1) | UW per Unit | |
Gross Potential Rent | $2,502,526 | $2,556,669 | $2,612,511 | $2,658,083 | $2,723,940(2) | $5,651 |
Total Other Income(3) | $182,136 | $218,025 | $229,724 | $310,336 | $310,336 | $644 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss | ($289,520) |
($272,675) |
($297,827) |
($258,781) |
($229,637)(4) |
($476) |
Effective Gross Income | $2,395,142 | $2,502,019 | $2,544,409 | $2,709,638 | $2,804,639 | $5,819 |
Total Operating Expenses | $939,136 |
$989,659 |
$995,955 |
$1,077,106 |
$980,697 |
$2,035 |
Net Operating Income | $1,456,007 | $1,512,359 | $1,548,454 | $1,632,532 | $1,823,942 | $3,784 |
Capital Expenditures | $0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$24,100 |
$50 |
Net Cash Flow | $1,456,007 | $1,512,359 | $1,548,454 | $1,632,532 | $1,799,842 | $3,734 |
Occupancy % | 91.0% | 90.1% | 90.0% | 91.1% | 91.6% | |
NOI DSCR (P&I) | 1.01x | 1.05x | 1.08x | 1.13x | 1.27x | |
NCF DSCR (P&I) | 1.01x | 1.05x | 1.08x | 1.13x | 1.25x | |
NOI Debt Yield | 6.2% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 7.8% | |
NCF Debt Yield | 6.2% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 6.9% | 7.7% |
(1) | The increase in Net Operating Income from 10/31/2017 TTM to UW is due to an increase in Gross Potential Rent as rent increased between October 31, 2017 and December 4, 2017. In addition, operating expenses has decreased as RHP has canceled the contract with a pool operator resulting in $25,000 in annual savings and will remove some contracts related to grounds maintenance. |
(2) | UW Gross Potential Rent is underwritten to the December 4, 2017 rent roll for the 482 pads, which reflects physical occupancy of 91.6%, |
(3) | Total Other Income includes revenues cable fees, utilities reimbursements, and miscellaneous income. |
(4) | Vacancy is underwritten to 7.6%. |
A-3-104
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
A-3-105
10203 Sam Houston Park Drive Houston, TX 77064 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 15 The Offices at Sam Houston |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$22,000,000 63.8% 1.61x 10.2% |
Mortgage Loan Information | Property Information | ||||||
Mortgage Loan Seller: | CIBC | Single Asset/Portfolio: | Single Asset | ||||
Original Balance: | $22,000,000 | Location: | Houston, TX 77064 | ||||
Cut-off Date Balance: | $22,000,000 | General Property Type: | Office | ||||
% of Initial Pool Balance: | 2.1% | Detailed Property Type: | Suburban | ||||
Loan Purpose: | Refinance | Title Vesting: | Fee | ||||
Borrower Sponsor: | Chris P. D’Agostino | Year Built/Renovated: | 2014-2015/N/A | ||||
Mortgage Rate: | 4.47% | Size: | 108,498 SF | ||||
Note Date: | 12/29/2017 | Cut-off Date Balance per SF: | $203 | ||||
First Payment Date: | 2/1/2018 | Maturity Date Balance per SF: | $177 | ||||
Maturity Date: | 1/1/2028 | Property Manager: | D’Agostino Management, LLC (borrower-related) | ||||
Original Term to Maturity: | 120 months | ||||||
Original Amortization Term: | 360 months | ||||||
IO Period: | 36 months | ||||||
Seasoning: | 1 month | Underwriting and Financial Information | |||||
Prepayment Provisions: | LO (25); DEF (92); O (3) | UW NOI: | $2,244,401 | ||||
Lockbox/Cash Mgmt Status(1): | Springing/Springing | UW NOI Debt Yield: | 10.2% | ||||
Additional Debt Type: | N/A | UW NOI Debt Yield at Maturity: | 11.7% | ||||
Additional Debt Balance: | N/A | UW NCF DSCR: | 2.15x (IO) 1.61x (P&I) | ||||
Future Debt Permitted (Type): | No (N/A) | Most Recent NOI: | $1,908,813 (TTM 11/30/2017) | ||||
Reserves | 2nd Most Recent NOI: | $1,683,996 (12/31/2016) | |||||
Type | Initial | Monthly | Cap | 3rd Most Recent NOI(3): | N/A | ||
RE Tax: | $44,791 | $44,791 | N/A | Most Recent Occupancy(4): | 100.0% (1/4/2018) | ||
Insurance: | $29,826 | $2,983 | N/A | 2nd Most Recent Occupancy: | 88.9% (12/31/2016) | ||
Replacements: | $0 | $1,808 | $21,700 | 3rd Most Recent Occupancy: | N/A | ||
TI/LC: | $0 | $6,781 | $135,000 | Appraised Value (as of): | $34,500,000 (11/20/2017) | ||
Outstanding TI/LC(2): | $3,380,346 | $0 | N/A | Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: | 63.8% | ||
Free Rent(2): | $225,753 | $0 | N/A | Maturity Date LTV Ratio: | 55.8% | ||
Sources and Uses | ||||||
Sources | Proceeds | % of Total | Uses | Proceeds | % of Total | |
Loan Amount: | $22,000,000 | 100.0% | Loan Payoff: | $12,226,725 | 55.6% | |
Reserves: | $3,680,716 | 16.7% | ||||
Closing Costs: | $831,882 | 3.8% | ||||
Return of Equity: | $5,260,677 | 23.9% | ||||
Total Sources: | $22,000,000 | 100.0% | Total Uses: | $22,000,000 | 100.0% |
(1) | Cash management is required upon the occurrence of (i) an event of default, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio falling below 1.15x at the end of any calendar quarter or (iii) Caterpillar filing for bankruptcy, going dark or vacating. |
(2) | The largest tenant, Caterpillar, is required to begin paying rent on its 2nd floor expansion space on March 1, 2018 and is expected to fully occupy its 2nd floor expansion space by April 2018. The second largest tenant, IPSCO Tubulars, is required to begin paying rent on its new premises on April 22, 2018 and is expected to fully occupy its new premises by April 2018. At loan origination, $143,665 was escrowed for Caterpillar’s free rent period, $2,907,270 was escrowed for outstanding TI’s owed to Caterpillar, $82,088 was escrowed for IPSCO Tubulars’ free rent period, and $473,076 was escrowed for outstanding TI’s owed to IPSCO Tubulars. |
(3) | The Offices at Sam Houston was built in 2014-2015. Caterpillar’s lease commenced in June 2015. IPSCO Tubulars’ lease commenced in August 2015. |
(4) | Most Recent Occupancy includes Caterpillar’s 2nd floor expansion space and IPSCO Tubulars’ new premises. |
The Mortgage Loan. The fifteenth largest mortgage loan (“The Offices at Sam Houston Mortgage Loan”) is secured by a first priority fee mortgage encumbering a four-story, LEED certified, 108,498 SF Class A suburban office building located in Houston, Texas (“The Offices at Sam Houston Property”), approximately 15-miles northwest of Houston’s central business district (the “Houston CBD”). The proceeds of The Offices at Sam Houston Mortgage Loan were used to pay off a prior construction loan, fund reserves, pay closing costs and return equity to The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower (as defined below).
The Borrower and the Borrower Sponsor. The borrower is The Offices at Sam Houston, LLC (“The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower”), a single purpose Texas limited liability company. Indirectly, The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower is majority owned and controlled by Chris P. D’Agostino, the borrower sponsor and nonrecourse carve-out guarantor. Mr. D’Agostino is a principal of D’Agostino Companies, a family owned real estate company founded in 1961 and focused primarily on the acquisition, development and management of Class A office properties. D’Agostino Companies is headquartered in Conroe, TX and manages approximately 565,000 SF of commercial space; primarily in the Houston area.
The Property. Built in 2014-2015, The Offices at Sam Houston Property consists of a LEED-certified, Class A, four-story suburban office building with a 306-space, two-story parking garage and 182 surface parking spots situated on an approximately 4.3-acre site on the southwest corner of Sam Houston Park Drive and Houston Oaks Drive in Houston, Texas. The Offices at Sam Houston Property is located approximately 15-miles from the Houston CBD
A-3-106
10203 Sam Houston Park Drive Houston, TX 77064 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 15 The Offices at Sam Houston |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$22,000,000 63.8% 1.61x 10.2% |
and less than 1 mile from the Sam Houston Tollway/Beltway 8 which forms a loop around the city of Houston and connects with highways within Houston’s freeway network. The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower developed The Offices at Sam Houston Property at a total cost basis of $23.7 million.
In September 2013, The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower acquired the vacant land and began marketing the site for preleasing. In July 2014, Caterpillar, Inc. (“Caterpillar”) executed its original lease for 62,612 SF (57.7% of NRA) consisting of the full third and fourth floors and approximately one fourth of the first floor of The Offices at Sam Houston Property, which allowed construction to begin. In December 2014, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. (“IPSCO Tubulars”) executed a lease for 27,748 SF (25.6% NRA) for the full second floor. In April 2015, Caterpillar expanded its leased premises to include an additional 6,323 SF on the first floor, bringing leasing to 88.9% of NRA. IPSCO Tubulars was paying rent on its second floor space but had not taken occupancy yet. In September 2017, in connection with Caterpillar’s desire to expand its leased premises again, The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower negotiated a lease amendment with IPSCO Tubulars to downsize and relocate its space to the balance of the first floor (12,007 SF). This allowed The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower to negotiate a lease amendment in October 2017 with Caterpillar to take the entire second floor. The Offices at Sam Houston Property is 100% leased as of January 4, 2018 to two tenants, Caterpillar (88.9% of NRA) and IPSCO Tubulars (11.1% of NRA).
Major Tenants.
Caterpillar (96,491 SF, 88.9% of NRA, 90.0% of underwritten base rent). Incorporated on March 12, 1986, Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT) is a manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines and diesel-electric locomotives. Caterpillar has been a tenant at The Offices at Sam Houston Property since building completion, initially leasing 62,612 SF before expanding its leased premises twice to its current leased area of 96,491 SF. Caterpillar’s leased space consists of 12,184 SF of the first floor and the entirety of the second floor (27,748 SF), third floor (28,239 SF) and fourth floor (28,320 SF). Caterpillar is expected to take physical occupancy of its 27,748 second floor space by April 2018. The Offices at Sam Houston Property serves as a regional marketing and sales headquarters for oil & gas, marine and solar panel products for Caterpillar. George Bush Intercontinental Airport, located approximately 17.6 miles away, is a main hub for flights to and from Latin America cities where, according to Caterpillar, it has been experiencing sales growth. Caterpillar currently pays base rent of $20.71 PSF, and has scheduled rent increases of $0.50 PSF commencing in March of each year through its lease expiring in February 2030. Caterpillar has three extension options remaining (of 3, 4 or 5 years). Caterpillar is permitted to reduce its leased premises by up to one full floor (limited to contiguous areas on any one floors leased solely to Caterpillar) on September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2026 by providing twelve months prior written notice and paying unamortized costs to The Offices at Sam Houston Borrower. Unamortized costs are to be approximately (i) $46.85 PSF, as of September 30, 2024 and (ii) $32.14 PSF, as of September 30, 2026. Caterpillar may not reduce its leased premises by more than one full floor in the aggregate. As of December 31, 2017, Caterpillar reported full year sales of $45.5 billion in 2017, up approximately 18% from 2016. Caterpillar is rated A3/A/A by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.
IPSCO Tubulars (12,007 SF, 11.1% of NRA, 10.0% of underwritten base rent). IPSCO Tubulars is the American division of TMK a producer of tubular products for the oil and gas industry. TMK is headquartered in Russia and its shares are publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange and on Russia’s MICEX-RTS trading floor. IPSCO Tubulars is one of the largest North American producers of welded and seamless pipe and premium connections dedicated to serving the oil and gas industry and many industrial markets. IPSCO Tubulars has been a tenant at The Offices at Sam Houston Property since August 2015; however, it did not take physical occupancy or finish its build out of its original leased space on the second floor. As of September 2017, IPSCO Tubulars amended its lease to move its leased premises to 12,007 SF (11.1% NRA) on the first floor and rent commencement of its initial base rent of $20.51 PSF is scheduled for April 2018. IPSCO Tubulars’ base rent is scheduled to increase by $0.50 PSF annually through its lease expiration in April 2023. IPSCO Tubulars has one five-year renewal option remaining. IPSCO Tubulars is expected to take physical occupancy by April 2018.
The following table presents certain information relating to the leases at The Offices at Sam Houston Property:
Tenant Summary(1) | |||||||
Tenant Name | Credit
Rating (Fitch/Moody’s/S&P) |
Tenant SF(3) | Approximate % of SF | Annual UW Base Rent | %
of Total Annual UW Base Rent |
Annual UW Base Rent PSF | Lease Expiration |
Caterpillar(2) | A/A3/A | 96,491 | 88.9% | $2,219,293 | 90.0% | $23.00 | 2/28/2030 |
IPSCO Tubulars(3) | NR/NR/NR | 12,007 | 11.1% | $246,264 | 10.0% | $20.51 | 4/21/2023 |
Vacant Space | 0 | 0.0% | $0 | 0.0% | $0.00 | ||
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 108,498 | 100.0% | $2,465,557 | 100.0% | $22.72 |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated January 4, 2018. |
(2) | Caterpillar is expected to take occupancy of its 27,748 SF second floor space in April 2018 and is scheduled to commence paying on its second floor space in March 2018. The underwritten base rent for Caterpillar is equal to the average of the rent paid by Caterpillar over the term of The Offices at Sam Houston Mortgage Loan. |
(3) | IPSCO Tubulars is expected to take occupancy and pay rent on its space in April 2018. |
A-3-107
10203 Sam Houston Park Drive Houston, TX 77064 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 15 The Offices at Sam Houston |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$22,000,000 63.8% 1.61x 10.2% |
The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at The Offices at Sam Houston Property:
Lease Rollover Schedule(1)(2) | ||||||||
Year | # of Leases Rolling | SF Rolling | Approx. % of Total SF Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of SF Rolling | UW Base Rent PSF Rolling(2)(3) | Total UW Base Rent Rolling(3) | Approx. % of Total Base Rent Rolling | Approx. Cumulative % of Total Base Rent Rolling |
MTM | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2019 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2021 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2022 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2023 | 1 | 12,007 | 11.1% | 11.1% | $20.51 | $246,264 | 10.0% | 10.0% |
2024 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 10.0% |
2025 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 10.0% |
2026 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 10.0% |
2027 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 10.0% |
2028 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 10.0% |
2029 & Beyond | 1 | 96,491 | 88.9% | 100.0% | $23.00 | $2,219,293 | 90.0% | 100.0% |
Vacant | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | $0.00 | $0 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 2 | 108,498 | 100.0% | $22.72 | $2,465,557 | 100.0% |
(1) | Based on the underwritten rent roll dated January 4, 2018. |
(2) | Caterpillar’s contraction options are not considered in the above Lease Rollover Schedule. |
The Market. The Offices at Sam Houston Property is located on the southwest corner of Sam Houston Park Drive and Houston Oaks Drive in Houston, Texas, in Houston’s West Belt submarket, in the northwestern portion of Houston. Sam Houston Park Drive provides direct access to Sam Houston Parkway, the primary thoroughfare in the market area. The market area is accessible via US 290, I-45, and Sam Houston Parkway/Beltway 8. Beltway 8 forms a loop around the city of Houston and connects with highways within Houston’s freeway network. Interstate 45 is a north-south thoroughfare that provides direct access to the Houston CBD and Galveston and Montgomery counties. The Offices at Sam Houston Property is located within 15-18 miles of the Houston CBD to the southeast, George Bush Intercontinental Airport to the east, The Woodlands to the north, and the Energy Corridor affluent neighborhoods such as River Oaks, Westchase and Uptown/Galleria to the south.
According to the appraisal, Houston’s economy has a broad industrial base in energy, manufacturing, aeronautics, and transportation. With health care sectors and building oilfield equipment, outside of New York City, Houston has more Fortune 500 headquarters within its city limits than any other U.S. municipality. The Port of Houston ranks first in the United States in international waterborne tonnage handled and second in total cargo tonnage handled. The city has a population from various ethnic and religious backgrounds and a large and growing international community. It is home to many cultural institutions and exhibits, which attract more than 7 million visitors a year to the Museum District.
According to the appraisal, the estimated 2017 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius was 11,122, 109,253, and 289,790, respectively. The 2017 estimated average household income within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius was $88,073, $88,116, and $85,369, respectively.
According to a third party market research report, The Offices at Sam Houston Property is located within the West Belt office submarket of the larger Houston office market. As of the third quarter of 2017, the Houston office market had approximately 306 million SF of office inventory, average asking rents of $27.60 PSF and a vacancy rate of 16.4%. As of the third quarter of 2017, the West Belt office submarket had approximately 6.7 million SF of office inventory, average asking rents of $25.85 PSF and a vacancy rate of 17.4%. As of the third quarter of 2017, the West Belt Class A office submarket had approximately 4.4 million SF of office inventory, average asking rents of $27.56 PSF and a vacancy rate of 18.6%.
The appraiser identified five comparable office properties in the immediate area that were considered to be directly competitive with The Offices at Sam Houston Property. These properties, which range from 41,038 SF to 317,504 SF, were constructed between 2003 and 2008, had a weighted average occupancy of 93% and asking rents ranging from $18.00 PSF to $23.50 PSF on a triple net basis. The appraiser concluded to a stabilized occupancy of 94% and a market rental rate of $20.75/SF NNN for The Offices at Sam Houston Property. The concluded market rental rate is in-line with the weighted average in-place rental rate of $20.69/SF at The Offices at Sam Houston Property.
A-3-108
10203 Sam Houston Park Drive Houston, TX 77064 |
Collateral Asset Summary – Loan No. 15 The Offices at Sam Houston |
Cut-off Date Balance: Cut-off Date LTV Ratio: UW NCF DSCR: UW NOI Debt Yield: |
$22,000,000 63.8% 1.61x 10.2% |
Directly competitive properties to The Offices at Sam Houston Property identified by the appraiser are shown in the table below:
Directly Competitive Buildings | |||||
Property | Size (SF) | Year Built | Occupancy | Quoted Rent PSF | Lease Type |
10343 Sam Houston Park Drive | 159,175 | 2007 | 95% | $19.00 | NNN |
10740 North Gessner Drive | 76,709 | 2008 | 85% | $18.00 | NNN |
7906 North Sam Houston Parkway West | 41,038 | 2004 | 74% | $18.00 | NNN |
7904 North Sam Houston Parkway | 42,200 | 2003 | 75% | $18.00 | NNN |
5825 North Sam Houston Parkway | 317,504 | 2008 | 99% | $23.50 | NNN |
Total/Wtd. Avg. | 636,626 | 93% |
Source: Appraisal
Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at The Offices at Sam Houston Property:
Cash Flow Analysis | ||||||
2014(1) | 2015(1) | 2016 | 11/30/2017 TTM | UW | UW PSF | |
Rents in Place(2) | N/A | N/A | $1,915,223 | $1,969,871 | $2,465,557 | $22.72 |
Vacant Income | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0.00 |
Gross Potential Rent | N/A | N/A | $1,915,223 | $1,969,871 | $2,465,557 | $22.72 |
Total Reimbursements | N/A | N/A | $755,174 | $897,338 | $958,740 | $8.84 |
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss(3) | N/A |
N/A |
$0 |
$0 |
($215,731) |
($1.99) |
Effective Gross Income | N/A | N/A | $2,670,398 | $2,867,209 | $3,208,566 | $29.57 |
Total Operating Expenses | N/A |
N/A |
$986,401 |
$958,396 |
$964,165 |
$8.89 |
Net Operating Income | N/A | N/A | $1,683,996 | $1,908,813 | $2,244,401 | $20.69 |
Capital Expenditures | N/A | N/A | $0 | $0 | $21,700 | $0.20 |
TI/LC | N/A |
N/A |
$0 |
$0 |
$81,374 |
$0.75 |
Net Cash Flow | N/A | N/A | $1,683,996 | $1,908,813 | $2,141,328 | $19.74 |
Occupancy % | N/A | N/A | 88.9% | 88.9% | 93.7% | |
NOI DSCR (P&I) | N/A | N/A | 1.26x | 1.43x | 1.68x | |
NCF DSCR (P&I) | N/A | N/A | 1.26x | 1.43x | 1.61x | |
NOI Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | 7.7% | 8.7% | 10.2% | |
NCF Debt Yield | N/A | N/A | 7.7% | 8.7% | 9.7% |
(1) | The Offices at Sam Houston was built in 2014-2015. Caterpillar’s lease commenced in June 2015. IPSCO Tubulars’ lease commenced in August 2015. |
(2) | Underwritten Rents in Place based on the in-place rent for IPSCO Tubulars and the average of the rent paid by Caterpillar over the term of The Offices at Sam Houston Mortgage Loan. |
(3) | Underwritten Vacancy & Credit Loss of 6.3% is based a 5% vacancy factor applied to the Caterpillar space given the investment grade tenant and long term lease and the submarket vacancy applied to the IPSCO Tubulars space. |
A-3-109
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX B
FORM OF DISTRIBUTION DATE STATEMENT
B-1
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
DISTRIBUTION DATE STATEMENT | ||||||||
Table of Contents | ||||||||
STATEMENT SECTIONS | PAGE(s) | |||||||
Certificate Distribution Detail | 2 | |||||||
Certificate Factor Detail | 3 | |||||||
Reconciliation Detail | 4 | |||||||
Other Required Information | 5 | |||||||
Cash Reconciliation Detail | 6 | |||||||
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification Tables | 7 - 9 | |||||||
Mortgage Loan Detail | 10 | |||||||
NOI Detail | 11 | |||||||
Principal Prepayment Detail | 12 | |||||||
Historical Detail | 13 | |||||||
Delinquency Loan Detail | 14 | |||||||
Specially Serviced Loan Detail | 15 - 16 | |||||||
Advance Summary | 17 | |||||||
Modified Loan Detail | 18 | |||||||
Historical Liquidated Loan Detail | 19 | |||||||
Historical Bond / Collateral Loss Reconciliation | 20 | |||||||
Interest Shortfall Reconciliation Detail | 21 - 22 | |||||||
Supplemental Reporting | 23 | |||||||
Depositor | Master Servicer | Special Servicer | Asset Representations Reviewer/Operating Advisor |
|||||||||||||||
UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC | Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC |
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC | |||||||||||||||
Bank, National Association | Bank, National Association | |||||||||||||||||
1285 Avenue of the Americas | 10851 Mastin Street | 10851 Mastin Street | 600 Third Avenue | |||||||||||||||
New York, NY 10019 | Building 82, Suite 300 | Building 82, Suite 300 | 40th Floor | |||||||||||||||
Overland Park, KS 66210 |
Overland Park, KS 66210 | New York, NY 10022 | ||||||||||||||||
Contact: General Information | Contact: Heather Wagner | Contact: Heather Wagner | Contact: David Rodgers | |||||||||||||||
Phone Number: (212) 713-2000 | Phone Number: (913) 253-9570 | Phone Number: (913) 253-9570 | Phone Number: (212) 310-9821 | |||||||||||||||
This report is compiled by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from information provided by third parties. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has not independently confirmed the accuracy of the information.
Please visit www.ctslink.com for additional information and if applicable, any special notices and any credit risk retention notices. In addition, certificateholders may register online for email notification when special notices are posted. For information or assistance please call 866-846-4526. |
||||||||||||||||||
Page 1 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Certificate Distribution Detail | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class | CUSIP | Pass-Through Rate |
Original Balance |
Beginning Balance |
Principal Distribution |
Interest Distribution |
Prepayment Premium |
Realized Loss/ Additional Trust Fund Expenses |
Total Distribution |
Ending Balance |
Current Subordination Level (1) |
|||||||||||||||
A-1 | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
A-2 | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
A-SB | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
A-3 | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
A-4 | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
A-S | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
B | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
C | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
D | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
D-RR | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
E-RR | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
F-RR | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
NR-RR | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
Z | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
R | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
Totals | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||
Class | CUSIP | Pass-Through Rate |
Original Notional Amount |
Beginning Notional Amount |
Interest Distribution |
Prepayment Premium |
Total Distribution |
Ending Notional Amount |
||||||||||||||||||
X-A | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
X-B | 0.000000% | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) Calculated by taking (A) the sum of the ending certificate balance of all classes less (B) the sum of (i) the ending balance of the designated class and (ii) the ending certificate balance of all classes which are not subordinate to the designated class and dividing the result by (A).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 2 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Certificate Factor Detail | |||||||||
Class | CUSIP | Beginning |
Principal |
Interest |
Prepayment |
Realized
Loss/ |
Ending |
||
A-1 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
A-2 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
A-SB | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
A-3 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
A-4 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
A-S | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
B | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
C | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
D | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
D-RR | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
E-RR | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
F-RR | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
NR-RR | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
Z | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
R | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||
Class | CUSIP | Beginning Notional Amount |
Interest Distribution |
Prepayment Premium |
Ending Notional Amount |
||||
X-A | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||||
X-B | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | 0.00000000 | |||||
Page 3 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Reconciliation Detail | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Reconciliation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stated
Beginning Principal Balance |
Unpaid
Beginning Principal Balance |
Scheduled
Principal |
Unscheduled Principal | Principal Adjustments | Realized Loss | Stated
Ending Principal Balance |
Unpaid
Ending Principal Balance |
Current
Principal Distribution Amount |
||||||||||||||
Total | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Certificate Interest Reconciliation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class | Accrual Dates |
Accrual Days |
Accrued Certificate Interest |
Net Aggregate Prepayment Interest Shortfall |
Distributable Certificate Interest |
Distributable Certificate Interest Adjustment |
WAC CAP Shortfall |
Interest Shortfall/(Excess) |
Interest Distribution |
Remaining
Unpaid Distributable Certificate Interest |
|||||||||||||||
A-1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
A-2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
A-SB | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
A-3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
A-4 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
X-A | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
X-B | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
A-S | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
B | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
C | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
D | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
D-RR | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
E-RR | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
F-RR | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
NR-RR | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
Totals | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
Page 4 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Other Required Information | |||||||||||||||||||
Available Distribution Amount (1) | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Appraisal Reduction Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Loan Number |
Appraisal | Cumulative | Most Recent | ||||||||||||||||
Reduction | ASER | App. Reduction |
|||||||||||||||||
Effected | Amount | Date | |||||||||||||||||
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) The Available Distribution Amount includes any Prepayment Fees. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Page 5 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Cash Reconciliation Detail | ||||||||
Total Funds Collected | Total Funds Distributed | |||||||
Interest: | Fees: | |||||||
Scheduled Interest | 0.00 | Master Servicing Fee - Midland Loan Services | 0.00 | |||||
Interest reductions due to Nonrecoverability Determinations | 0.00 | Trustee Fee - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 0.00 | |||||
Interest Adjustments | 0.00 | Certificate Administrator Fee - Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 0.00 | |||||
Deferred Interest | 0.00 | CREFC® License Fee | 0.00 | |||||
ARD Interest | 0.00 | Operating Advisor Fee - Park Bridge Lender Services LLC | 0.00 | |||||
Default Interest and Late Payment Charges | 0.00 | Asset Representations Reviewer Fee - Park Bridge Lender Services LLC | 0.00 | |||||
Net Prepayment Interest Shortfall | 0.00 | Total Fees | 0.00 | |||||
Net Prepayment Interest Excess | 0.00 | |||||||
Extension Interest | 0.00 | |||||||
Interest Reserve Withdrawal | 0.00 | |||||||
Total Interest Collected | 0.00 | Additional Trust Fund Expenses: | ||||||
Reimbursement for Interest on Advances | 0.00 | |||||||
Principal: | ASER Amount | 0.00 | ||||||
Scheduled Principal | 0.00 | Special Servicing Fee | 0.00 | |||||
Unscheduled Principal | 0.00 | Attorney Fees & Expenses | 0.00 | |||||
Principal Prepayments | 0.00 | Bankruptcy Expense | 0.00 | |||||
Collection of Principal after Maturity Date | 0.00 | Taxes Imposed on Trust Fund | 0.00 | |||||
Recoveries from Liquidation and Insurance Proceeds | 0.00 | Non-Recoverable Advances | 0.00 | |||||
Excess of Prior Principal Amounts paid | 0.00 | Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts | 0.00 | |||||
Curtailments | 0.00 | Other Expenses | 0.00 | |||||
Negative Amortization | 0.00 | Total Additional Trust Fund Expenses | 0.00 | |||||
Principal Adjustments | 0.00 | |||||||
Total Principal Collected | 0.00 | Interest Reserve Deposit | 0.00 | |||||
Payments to Certificateholders & Others: | ||||||||
Other: | Interest Distribution | 0.00 | ||||||
Prepayment Penalties/Yield Maintenance Charges | 0.00 | Principal Distribution | 0.00 | |||||
Repayment Fees | 0.00 | Prepayment Penalties/Yield Maintenance Charges | 0.00 | |||||
Borrower Option Extension Fees | 0.00 | Borrower Option Extension Fees | 0.00 | |||||
Excess Liquidation Proceeds | 0.00 | Net Swap Counterparty Payments Received | 0.00 | |||||
Net Swap Counterparty Payments Received | 0.00 | Total Payments to Certificateholders & Others | 0.00 | |||||
Total Other Collected | 0.00 | Total Funds Distributed | 0.00 | |||||
Total Funds Collected | 0.00 | |||||||
Page 6 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Current Mortgage Loan and Property Stratification Tables Aggregate Pool |
||||||||||||||||
Scheduled Balance | State (3) | |||||||||||||||
Scheduled Balance |
# of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
% of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
State | # of Props. |
Scheduled Balance |
% of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
|||
Totals | Totals | |||||||||||||||
See footnotes on last page of this section. | ||||||||||||||||
Page 7 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Current Mortgage Loan
and Property Stratification Tables Aggregate Pool |
||||||||||||||||
Debt Service Coverage Ratio | Property Type (3) | |||||||||||||||
Debt
Service Coverage Ratio |
#
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
Property Type | #
of Props. |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
|||
Totals | Totals | |||||||||||||||
Note Rate | Seasoning | |||||||||||||||
Note Rate |
#
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
Seasoning | #
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
|||
Totals | Totals | |||||||||||||||
See footnotes on last page of this section. | ||||||||||||||||
Page 8 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Current Mortgage Loan
and Property Stratification Tables Aggregate Pool |
||||||||||||||||
Anticipated Remaining Term (ARD and Balloon Loans) | Remaining Stated Term (Fully Amortizing Loans) | |||||||||||||||
Anticipated
Remaining Term (2) |
#
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM
(2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
Remaining
Stated Term |
#
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
|||
Totals | Totals | |||||||||||||||
Remaining Amortization Term (ARD and Balloon Loans) | Age of Most Recent NOI | |||||||||||||||
Remaining
Amortization Term |
#
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM
(2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
Age
of Most Recent NOI |
#
of loans |
Scheduled Balance |
%
of Agg. Bal. |
WAM (2) |
WAC | Weighted Avg DSCR (1) |
|||
Totals | Totals | |||||||||||||||
(1) Debt Service Coverage Ratios are updated periodically as new NOI figures become available from borrowers on an asset level. In all cases the most current DSCR provided by the Servicer is used. To the extent that no DSCR is provided by the Servicer, information from the offering document is used. The Trustee makes no representations as to the accuracy of the data provided by the borrower for this calculation. |
||||||||||||||||
(2) Anticipated Remaining Term and WAM are each calculated based upon the term from the current month to the earlier of the Anticipated Repayment Date, if applicable, and the Maturity Date. |
||||||||||||||||
(3) Data in this table was calculated by allocating pro-rata the current loan information to the properties based upon the Cut-Off Date balance of each property as disclosed in the offering document. |
||||||||||||||||
The Scheduled Balance Totals reflect the aggregate balances of all pooled loans as reported in the CREFC Loan Periodic Update File. To the extent that the Scheduled Balance Total figure for the “State” and “Property” stratification tables is not equal to the sum of the scheduled balance figures for each state or property, the difference is explained by loans that have been modified into a split loan structure. The “State” and “Property” stratification tables do not include the balance of the subordinate note (sometimes called the B-piece or a “hope note”) of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. Rather, the scheduled balance for each state or property only reflects the balance of the senior note (sometimes called the A-piece) of a loan that has been modified into a split-loan structure. | ||||||||||||||||
Note: There are no Hyper-Amortization Loans included in the Mortgage Pool. | ||||||||||||||||
Page 9 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Mortgage Loan Detail | |||||||||||||||||||
Loan Number |
ODCR | Property Type (1) |
City | State | Interest Payment |
Principal Payment |
Gross Coupon |
Anticipated
Repayment Date |
Maturity Date |
Neg. Amort (Y/N) |
Beginning Scheduled Balance |
Ending Scheduled Balance |
Paid Thru Date |
Appraisal Reduction Date |
Appraisal Reduction Amount |
Res. Strat. (2) |
Mod. Code (3) |
||
Totals |
(1) Property Type Code | (2) Resolution Strategy Code | (3) Modification Code | ||||||||||||||||||||
MF | - | Multi-Family | SS |
- | Self Storage |
1 | - | Modification | 7 | - | REO | 11 | - | Full Payoff | 1 | - | Maturity Date Extension | 6 | - | Capitalization on Interest | ||
RT | - | Retail | 98 | - | Other |
2 | - | Foreclosure | 8 | - | Resolved | 12 | - | Reps and Warranties | 2 | - | Amortization Change | 7 | - | Capitalization on Taxes | ||
HC | - | Health Care | SE | - | Securities |
3 | - | Bankruptcy | 9 | - | Pending Return | 13 | - | TBD | 3 | - | Principal Write-Off | 8 | - | Other | ||
IN | - | Industrial | CH | - | Cooperative Housing |
4 | - | Extension | to Master Servicer | 98 | - | Other | 4 | - | Blank | 9 | - | Combination | ||||
MH | - | Mobile Home Park | WH | - | Warehouse | 5 | - | Note Sale | 10 | - | Deed in Lieu Of | 5 | - | Temporary Rate Reduction | 10 | - | Forbearance |
|||||
OF | - | Office | ZZ |
- | Missing Information |
6 | - | DPO |
Foreclosure |
|||||||||||||
MU |
- | Mixed Use |
SF | - | Single Family |
|||||||||||||||||
LO |
- | Lodging | ||||||||||||||||||||
Page 10 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
NOI Detail | |||||||||||
Loan Number |
ODCR | Property Type |
City | State | Ending Scheduled Balance |
Most Recent Fiscal NOI (1) |
Most Recent NOI (1) |
Most
Recent NOI Start Date |
Most
Recent NOI End Date |
||
Total | |||||||||||
(1) The Most Recent Fiscal NOI and Most Recent NOI fields correspond to the financial data reported by the Master Servicer. An NOI of 0.00 means the Master Servicer did not report NOI figures in their loan level reporting. | |||||||||||
Page 11 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Principal Prepayment Detail | ||||||||
Loan Number | Loan Group | Offering Document |
Principal Prepayment Amount | Prepayment Penalties | ||||
Cross-Reference | Payoff Amount | Curtailment Amount | Prepayment
Premium |
Yield
Maintenance Charge |
||||
Totals | ||||||||
Page 12 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Historical Detail | |||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquencies | Prepayments | Rate and Maturities | |||||||||||||||||||
Distribution | 30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90 Days or More | Foreclosure | REO | Modifications | Curtailments | Payoff | Next Weighted Avg. | WAM | |||||||||||
Date | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Balance | # | Amount | # | Amount | Coupon | Remit | |||
Note: Foreclosure and REO Totals are excluded from the delinquencies. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Page 13 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Delinquency Loan Detail | |||||||||||||||
Loan Number | Offering Document Cross-Reference |
#
of Months Delinq. |
Paid
Through Date |
Current P & I Advances |
Outstanding P & I Advances ** |
Status
of Loan (1) |
Resolution Strategy Code (2) |
Servicing Transfer Date |
Foreclosure Date |
Actual Principal Balance |
Outstanding Servicing Advances |
Bankruptcy Date |
REO Date |
||
Totals |
(1) Status of Mortgage Loan | (2) Resolution Strategy Code | |||||||||||||||||||
A | - | Payment Not Received | 0 | - Current | 4 | - | Performing Matured Balloon |
1 | - | Modification | 7 | - | REO | 11 | - | Full Payoff |
||||
But Still in Grace Period | 1 | - 30-59 Days Delinquent | 5 | - | Non Performing Matured Balloon | 2 | - | Foreclosure | 8 | - | Resolved | 12 | - | Reps and Warranties | ||||||
Or Not Yet Due | 2 | - 60-89 Days Delinquent | 6 | - | 121+ Days Delinquent | 3 | - | Bankruptcy | 9 | - | Pending Return | 13 | - | TBD | ||||||
B | - | Late Payment But Less | 3 | - 90-120 Days Delinquent | 4 | - | Extension | to Master Servicer | 98 | - | Other |
|||||||||
Than 30 Days Delinquent | 5 | - | Note Sale | 10 | - | Deed In Lieu Of |
||||||||||||||
6 | - | DPO | Foreclosure |
|||||||||||||||||
** Outstanding P & I Advances include the current period advance. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Page 14 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Specially Serviced Loan Detail - Part 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan Number |
Offering Document Cross-Reference |
Servicing Transfer Date |
Resolution Strategy Code (1) |
Scheduled Balance |
Property Type (2) |
State | Interest Rate |
Actual Balance |
Net Operating Income |
DSCR Date |
DSCR | Note Date |
Maturity Date |
Remaining Amortization Term |
||
(1) Resolution Strategy Code | (2) Property Type Code | ||||||||||||||
1 | - Modification | 7 | - | REO | 11 | - | Full Payoff | MF | - | Multi-Family | SS | - | Self Storage |
||
2 | - Foreclosure | 8 | - | Resolved | 12 | - | Reps and Warranties | RT | - | Retail | 98 | - | Other |
||
3 | - Bankruptcy | 9 | - | Pending Return | 13 | - | TBD | HC | - | Health Care | SE | - | Securities |
||
4 | - Extension | to Master Servicer | 98 | - | Other | IN | - | Industrial | CH | - | Cooperative Housing |
||||
5 | - Note Sale | 10 | - | Deed in Lieu Of | MH | - | Mobile Home Park | WH | - | Warehouse |
|||||
6 | - DPO | Foreclosure | OF |
- | Office |
ZZ |
- | Missing Information |
|||||||
MU |
- | Mixed Use |
SF | - | Single Family | ||||||||||
LO |
- | Lodging |
|||||||||||||
Page 15 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Specially Serviced Loan Detail - Part 2 | ||||||||||
Loan Number |
Offering Document Cross-Reference |
Resolution Strategy Code (1) |
Site Inspection Date |
Phase 1 Date |
Appraisal Date | Appraisal Value |
Other
REO Property Revenue |
Comment from Special Servicer |
||
(1) Resolution Strategy Code | (2) Property Type Code | ||||||||||||||
1 | - Modification | 7 | - | REO | 11 | - | Full Payoff | MF | - | Multi-Family | SS | - | Self Storage |
||
2 | - Foreclosure | 8 | - | Resolved | 12 | - | Reps and Warranties | RT | - | Retail | 98 | - | Other |
||
3 | - Bankruptcy | 9 | - | Pending Return | 13 | - | TBD | HC | - | Health Care | SE | - | Securities |
||
4 | - Extension | to Master Servicer | 98 | - | Other | IN | - | Industrial | CH | - | Cooperative Housing |
||||
5 | - Note Sale | 10 | - | Deed in Lieu Of | MH | - | Mobile Home Park | WH | - | Warehouse |
|||||
6 | - DPO | Foreclosure | OF |
- | Office |
ZZ |
- | Missing Information |
|||||||
MU |
- | Mixed Use |
SF | - | Single Family | ||||||||||
LO |
- | Lodging |
|||||||||||||
Page 16 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Advance Summary | ||||||
Loan Group | Current
P&I Advances |
Outstanding
P&I Advances |
Outstanding
Servicing Advances |
Current
Period Interest on P&I and Servicing Advances Paid |
||
Totals | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
Page 17 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Modified Loan Detail | |||||||||
Loan Number |
Offering Document Cross-Reference |
Pre-Modification Balance |
Post-Modification Balance |
Pre-Modification Interest Rate |
Post-Modification Interest Rate |
Modification Date |
Modification Description | ||
Totals | |||||||||
Page 18 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Historical Liquidated Loan Detail | ||||||||||||||
Distribution Date |
ODCR | Beginning Scheduled Balance |
Fees, Advances, and Expenses * |
Most
Recent Appraised Value or BPO |
Gross
Sales Proceeds or Other Proceeds |
Net
Proceeds Received on Liquidation |
Net
Proceeds Available for Distribution |
Realized
Loss to Trust |
Date
of Current Period Adj. to Trust |
Current
Period Adjustment to Trust |
Cumulative Adjustment to Trust |
Loss
to Loan with Cum Adj. to Trust |
||
Current Total | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative Total | ||||||||||||||
* Fees, Advances and Expenses also include outstanding P & I advances and unpaid fees (servicing, trustee, etc.). | ||||||||||||||
Page 19 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Historical Bond/Collateral Loss Reconciliation Detail | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution Date |
Offering Document Cross-Reference |
Beginning Balance at Liquidation |
Aggregate Realized Loss on Loans |
Prior
Realized Loss Applied to Certificates |
Amounts Covered by Credit Support |
Interest (Shortages)/ Excesses |
Modification /Appraisal Reduction Adj. |
Additional (Recoveries) /Expenses |
Realized
Loss Applied to Certificates to Date |
Recoveries
of Realized Losses Paid as Cash |
(Recoveries)/ Losses Applied to Certificate Interest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 20 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Interest Shortfall Reconciliation Detail - Part 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offering Document Cross- Reference |
Stated Principal Balance at Contribution |
Current Ending Scheduled Balance |
Special Servicing Fees | ASER | (PPIS) Excess | Non-Recoverable (Scheduled Interest) |
Interest
on Advances |
Modified
Interest Rate (Reduction) /Excess |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly | Liquidation | Work Out | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 21 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Interest Shortfall Reconciliation Detail - Part 2 | ||||||||
Offering Document Cross-Reference |
Stated
Principal Balance at Contribution |
Current
Ending Scheduled Balance |
Reimb of Advances to the Servicer | Other
(Shortfalls)/ Refunds |
Comments | |||
Current Month | Left
to Reimburse Master Servicer |
|||||||
Totals | ||||||||
Interest Shortfall Reconciliation Detail Part 2 Total | 0.00 | |||||||
Interest Shortfall Reconciliation Detail Part 1 Total | 0.00 | |||||||
Total Interest Shortfall Allocated to Trust | 0.00 | |||||||
Page 22 of 23
![]() |
UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8 |
For Additional Information please contact | |
CTSLink Customer Service | |||
1-866-846-4526 | |||
Reports Available www.ctslink.com | |||
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Payment Date: | 3/16/18 | |
Corporate Trust Services | Record Date: | 2/28/18 | |
8480 Stagecoach Circle | Determination Date: | 3/12/18 | |
Frederick, MD 21701-4747 |
Supplemental Reporting | ||
Page 23 of 23
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX C
FORM OF OPERATING ADVISOR ANNUAL REPORT1
Report Date: This report will be delivered annually no
later than [INSERT DATE], pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1,
2018 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”).
Transaction: UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C8, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2018-C8
Operating Advisor: Park Bridge Lender Services LLC
Special Servicer: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association
Directing Certificateholder: KKR Real Estate Credit Opportunity Partners Aggregator I L.P.
I. | Population of Mortgage Loans that Were Considered in Compiling this Report |
1. | The Special Servicer has notified the Operating Advisor that [●] Specially Serviced Loans were transferred to special servicing in the prior calendar year [INSERT YEAR]. |
(a) | [●] of those Specially Serviced Loans are still being analyzed by the Special Servicer as part of the development of an Asset Status Report. |
(b) | Asset Status Reports were issued with respect to [●] of such Specially Serviced Loans. This report is based only on the Specially Serviced Loans in respect of which an Asset Status Report has been issued. The Asset Status Reports may not yet be fully implemented. |
2. | [●] non-Specially Serviced Loans were the subject of a Major Decision as to which the operating advisor has consultation rights pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
II. | Executive Summary |
Based on the requirements and qualifications set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as well as the items listed below, the Operating Advisor (in accordance with the Operating Advisor’s analysis requirements outlined in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) has undertaken a limited review of the Special Servicer’s reported actions on the loans identified in this report. Based solely on such limited review and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth herein, the Operating Advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the Special Servicer [is/is not] operating in compliance with the Servicing Standard with respect to its performance of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the prior calendar year on an “asset-level basis”. [The Operating Advisor believes, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, that the Special Servicer has failed to materially comply with the Servicing Standard as a result of the following material deviations.]
● | [LIST OF MATERIAL DEVIATION ITEMS] |
1 This report is an indicative report and does not reflect the final form of annual report to be used in any particular year. The Operating Advisor will have the ability to modify or alter the organization and content of any particular report, subject to the compliance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including, without limitation, provisions relating to Privileged Information.
C-1
In addition, the Operating Advisor notes the following: [PROVIDE SUMMARY OF ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INFORMATION].
[ADD RECOMMENDATION OF REPLACEMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICER, IF APPLICABLE]
In connection with the assessment set forth in this report, the Operating Advisor:
1. | Reviewed the Asset Status Reports, the Special Servicer’s assessment of compliance report, attestation report by a third party regarding the Special Servicer’s compliance with its obligations and net present value calculations and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations and [LIST OTHER REVIEWED INFORMATION] for the following [●] Specially Serviced Loans: [List related mortgage loans] |
2. | Consulted with the Special Servicer as provided under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Operating Advisor’s analysis of the Asset Status Reports (including related net present value calculations and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations) related to the Specially Serviced Loans should be considered a limited investigation and not be considered a full or limited audit. For instance, we did not re-engineer the quantitative aspects of their net present value calculator, visit any property, visit the Special Servicer, visit the Directing Certificateholder or interact with any borrower. In addition, our review of the net present value calculations and Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations is limited to the mathematical accuracy of the calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portions of the applicable formulas, and as such, does not take into account the reasonableness of the discretionary portions of such formulas. |
III. | Specific Items of Review |
In rendering our assessment herein, we examined and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the items listed below:
1. | The Operating Advisor reviewed the following items in connection with the generation of this report: [LIST MATERIAL ITEMS]. |
2. | During the prior year, the Operating Advisor consulted with the Special Servicer regarding its strategy plan for a limited number of issues related to the following Specially Serviced Loans: [LIST]. The Operating Advisor participated in discussions and made strategic observations and recommended alternative courses of action to the extent it deemed such observations and recommendations appropriate. The Special Servicer [agreed with/did not agree with] the material recommendations made by the Operating Advisor. Such recommendations generally included the following: [LIST]. |
3. | Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations and net present value calculations. |
4. | The Operating Advisor [received/did not receive] information necessary to recalculate and verify the accuracy of the mathematical calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portions of the applicable formulas required to be utilized in connection with any Appraisal Reduction Amount or net present value calculations used in the special servicer’s determination of what course of action to take in connection with the workout or liquidation of a Specially Serviced Loan prior to the utilization by the special servicer. |
C-2
(a) | The operating advisor [agrees/does not agree] with the [mathematical calculations] [and/or] [the application of the applicable non-discretionary portions of the formula] required to be utilized for such calculation. |
(b) | After consultation with the special servicer to resolve any inaccuracy in the mathematical calculations or the application of the non-discretionary portions of the related formula in arriving at those mathematical calculations, such inaccuracy [has been/ has not been] resolved. |
5. | The following is a general discussion of certain concerns raised by the Operating Advisor discussed in this report: [LIST CONCERNS]. |
6. | In addition to the other information presented herein, the Operating Advisor notes the following additional items, if any: [LIST ADDITIONAL ITEMS]. |
NOTE: The Operating Advisor’s review of the above materials should be considered a limited review and not be considered a full or limited audit. For instance, we did not review underlying lease agreements or similar underlying documents, re-engineer the quantitative aspects of their net present value calculation, visit any related property, visit the Special Servicer, visit the Directing Certificateholder or interact with any borrower. In addition, our review of the net present value calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portions of the applicable formulas, and as such, does not take into account the reasonableness of the discretionary portions of such formulas.
IV. | Qualifications and Disclaimers Related to the Work Product Undertaken and Opinions Related to this Report |
1. | As provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Operating Advisor is not required to report on instances of non-compliance with, or deviations from, the Servicing Standard or the special servicer’s obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that the Operating Advisor determines, in its sole discretion exercised in good faith, to be immaterial. |
2. | In rendering our assessment herein, we have assumed that all executed factual statements, instruments, and other documents that we have relied upon in rendering this assessment have been executed by persons with legal capacity to execute such documents. |
3. | Other than receipt of any Major Decision Reporting Package or Asset Status Report that is delivered or made available to the Operating Advisor pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Operating Advisor did not participate in, or have access to, the Special Servicer’s and Directing Certificateholder’s discussion(s) regarding any Specially Serviced Loan. The Operating Advisor does not have authority to speak with the Directing Certificateholder or borrower directly. As such, the Operating Advisor relied upon the information delivered to it by the Special Servicer as well as its interaction with the Special Servicer, if any, in gathering the relevant information to generate this report. The services that we perform are not designed and cannot be relied upon to detect fraud or illegal acts should any exist. |
4. | The Special Servicer has the legal authority and responsibility to service any Specially Serviced Loans pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Operating Advisor has no responsibility or authority to alter the standards set forth therein or direct the actions of the Special Servicer. |
C-3
5. | Confidentiality and other contractual limitations limit the Operating Advisor’s ability to outline the details or substance of any communications held between it and the Special Servicer regarding any Specially Serviced Loans and certain information it reviewed in connection with its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. As a result, this report may not reflect all the relevant information that the Operating Advisor is given access to by the Special Servicer. |
6. | There are many tasks that the Special Servicer undertakes on an ongoing basis related to Specially Serviced Loans. These include, but are not limited to, assumptions, ownership changes, collateral substitutions, capital reserve changes, etc. The Operating Advisor does not participate in any discussions regarding such actions. As such, Operating Advisor has not assessed the Special Servicer’s operational compliance with respect to those types of actions. |
7. | The Operating Advisor is not empowered to speak with any investors directly. If the investors have questions regarding this report, they should address such questions to the certificate administrator through the certificate administrator’s website. |
8. | This report does not constitute recommendations to buy, sell or hold any security, nor does the Operating Advisor take into account market prices of securities or financial markets generally when performing its limited review of the Special Servicer as described above. The Operating Advisor does not have a fiduciary relationship with any Certificateholder or any other party or individual. Nothing is intended to or should be construed as creating a fiduciary relationship between the Operating Advisor and any Certificateholder, party or individual. |
Terms used but not defined herein have the meaning set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
C-4
ANNEX D-1
MORTGAGE LOAN REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
As of the date specified in the MLPA or such other date as set forth below, each mortgage loan seller will make, with respect to each mortgage loan sold by it that we include in the issuing entity, representations and warranties generally to the effect set forth below in this Annex D-1. Solely for purposes of this Annex D-1 and Annex D-2, the term “Mortgage Loans” will refer to such mortgage loans sold by the applicable mortgage loan seller. The exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth below are set forth in Annex D-2 attached to this prospectus. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Annex D-1 will have the meanings set forth in this prospectus or, if not defined in this prospectus, in the applicable MLPA or the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
Each MLPA, together with the related representations and warranties, serves to contractually allocate risk between the mortgage loan seller, on the one hand, and the issuing entity, on the other. Disclosure regarding the representations and warranties is set forth below for the sole purpose of describing some of the terms and conditions of that risk allocation. The presentation of representations and warranties below is not intended as statements regarding the actual characteristics of the mortgage loans, the mortgaged properties or other matters. We cannot assure you that the mortgage loans actually conform to the statements made in the representations and warranties that we present below.
1. Whole Loan; Ownership of Mortgage Loans. Except with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Whole Loan, each Mortgage Loan is a whole loan and not a participation interest in a Mortgage Loan. At the time of the sale, transfer and assignment to Purchaser, no Mortgage Note or Mortgage was subject to any assignment (other than assignments to Seller), participation or pledge, and Seller had good title to, and was the sole owner of, each Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, charges, pledges, encumbrances, participations, any other ownership interests on, in or to such Mortgage Loan other than any servicing rights appointment or similar agreement. Seller has full right and authority to sell, assign and transfer each Mortgage Loan, and the assignment to Purchaser constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment of such Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, pledges, charges or security interests of any nature encumbering such Mortgage Loan.
2. Mortgage Loan Document Status. Each related Mortgage Note, Mortgage, Assignment of Leases (if a separate instrument), guaranty and other agreement executed by or on behalf of the related Mortgagor, guarantor or other obligor in connection with such Mortgage Loan is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the related Mortgagor, guarantor or other obligor (subject to any non-recourse provisions contained in any of the foregoing agreements and any applicable state anti-deficiency or market value limit deficiency legislation), as applicable, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms, except (i) as such enforcement may be limited by (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law) and (ii) that certain provisions in such Mortgage Loan documents (including, without limitation, provisions requiring the payment of default interest, late fees or prepayment/yield maintenance fees, charges and/or premiums) are, or may be, further limited or rendered unenforceable by or under applicable law, but (subject to the limitations set forth in clause (i) above) such limitations or unenforceability will not render such Mortgage Loan documents invalid as a
D-1-1
whole or materially interfere with the Mortgagee’s realization of the principal benefits and/or security provided thereby (clauses (i) and (ii) collectively, the “Standard Qualifications”).
Except as set forth in the immediately preceding sentences, there is no valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right of rescission available to the related Mortgagor with respect to any of the related Mortgage Notes, Mortgages or other Mortgage Loan documents, including, without limitation, any such valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right based on intentional fraud by Seller in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, that would deny the Mortgagee the principal benefits intended to be provided by the Mortgage Note, Mortgage or other Mortgage Loan documents.
3. Mortgage Provisions. The Mortgage Loan documents for each Mortgage Loan contain provisions that render the rights and remedies of the holder thereof adequate for the practical realization against the Mortgaged Property of the principal benefits of the security intended to be provided thereby, including realization by judicial or, if applicable, nonjudicial foreclosure subject to the limitations set forth in the Standard Qualifications.
4. Mortgage Status; Waivers and Modifications. Since origination and except by written instruments set forth in the related Mortgage File (a) the material terms of such Mortgage, Mortgage Note, Mortgage Loan guaranty, and related Mortgage Loan documents have not been waived, impaired, modified, altered, satisfied, canceled, subordinated or rescinded in any respect which materially interferes with the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage; (b) no related Mortgaged Property or any portion thereof has been released from the lien of the related Mortgage in any manner which materially interferes with the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the use or operation of the remaining portion of such Mortgaged Property; and (c) neither the related Mortgagor nor the related guarantor has been released from its material obligations under the Mortgage Loan. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, except as contained in a written document included in the Mortgage File, there have been no modifications, amendments or waivers consented to by Seller on or after the Cut-off Date that could be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on such Mortgage Loan.
5. Lien; Valid Assignment. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each assignment of Mortgage and assignment of Assignment of Leases from Seller constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment from Seller. Each related Mortgage and Assignment of Leases is freely assignable without the consent of the related Mortgagor. Each related Mortgage is a legal, valid and enforceable first lien on the related Mortgagor’s fee (or with respect to those Mortgage Loans described in paragraph (34) hereof, leasehold) interest in the Mortgaged Property in the principal amount of such Mortgage Loan or allocated loan amount (subject only to Permitted Encumbrances (as defined below) and the exceptions to paragraph (6) set forth in Annex D-2 attached to this prospectus (each such exception, a “Title Exception”)), except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. Such Mortgaged Property (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions) as of origination was, and as of the Cut-off Date, to Seller’s knowledge, is free and clear of any recorded mechanics’ liens, recorded materialmen’s liens and other recorded encumbrances which are prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below), and, to Seller’s knowledge and subject to the rights of tenants (as tenants only) (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions), no rights exist which under law could give rise to any such lien or encumbrance that would be prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the
D-1-2
extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of UCC financing statements is required in order to effect such perfection.
6. Permitted Liens; Title Insurance. Each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan is covered by an American Land Title Association loan title insurance policy or a comparable form of loan title insurance policy approved for use in the applicable jurisdiction (or, if such policy is yet to be issued, by a pro forma policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment, in each case binding on the title insurer) (the “Title Policy”) in the original principal amount of such Mortgage Loan (or with respect to a Mortgage Loan secured by multiple properties, an amount equal to at least the allocated loan amount with respect to the Title Policy for each such property) after all advances of principal (including any advances held in escrow or reserves), that insures for the benefit of the owner of the indebtedness secured by the Mortgage, the first priority lien of the Mortgage, which lien is subject only to (a) the lien of current real property taxes, water charges, sewer rents and assessments not yet due and payable; (b) covenants, conditions and restrictions, rights of way, easements and other matters of public record; (c) the exceptions (general and specific) and exclusions set forth in such Title Policy; (d) other matters to which like properties are commonly subject; (e) the rights of tenants (as tenants only) under leases (including subleases) pertaining to the related Mortgaged Property and condominium declarations; and (f) if the related Mortgage Loan constitutes a Crossed Mortgage Loan, the lien of the Mortgage for the related Crossed Mortgage Loan or Crossed Mortgage Loans; provided that none of such items (a) through (f), individually or in the aggregate, materially and adversely interfere with the value or current use of the Mortgaged Property, the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage, or the current ability of the related Mortgaged Property to generate net cash flow sufficient to service the related Mortgage Loan, or the Mortgagor’s ability to pay its obligations when they become due (collectively, the “Permitted Encumbrances”). For purposes of clause (a) of the immediately preceding sentence, any such taxes, assessments and other charges shall not be considered due and payable until the date on which interest and/or penalties would be payable thereon. Except as contemplated by clause (f) of the preceding sentence none of the Permitted Encumbrances are mortgage liens that are senior to or coordinate and co-equal with the lien of the related Mortgage. Such Title Policy (or, if it has yet to be issued, the coverage to be provided thereby) is in full force and effect, all premiums thereon have been paid, no claims have been made by Seller thereunder and no claims have been paid thereunder. Neither Seller nor, to Seller’s knowledge, any other holder of the Mortgage Loan, has done, by act or omission, anything that would materially impair the coverage under such Title Policy.
7. Junior Liens. It being understood that Subordinate Companion Loans secured by the same Mortgage as a Mortgage Loan are not subordinate mortgages or junior liens, except for any Crossed Mortgage Loans, there are, as of origination, and to Seller’s knowledge, as of the Cut-off Date, no subordinate mortgages or junior liens securing the payment of money encumbering the related Mortgaged Property (other than Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, taxes and assessments, mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens (which are the subject of the representation in paragraph (5) above), and equipment and other personal property financing). Except as set forth in Annex D-2 attached to this prospectus, Seller has no knowledge of any mezzanine debt secured directly by interests in the related Mortgagor.
8. Assignment of Leases and Rents. There exists as part of the related Mortgage File an Assignment of Leases (either as a separate instrument or incorporated into the related Mortgage). Subject to the Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, each related Assignment of Leases creates a valid first-priority collateral assignment of, or a valid first-priority lien or security interest in, rents and certain rights under the related lease or leases,
D-1-3
subject only to a license granted to the related Mortgagor to exercise certain rights and to perform certain obligations of the lessor under such lease or leases, including the right to operate the related leased property, except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. The related Mortgage or related Assignment of Leases, subject to applicable law and the Standard Qualifications, provides that, upon an event of default under the Mortgage Loan, a receiver is permitted to be appointed for the collection of rents or for the related Mortgagee to enter into possession to collect the rents or for rents to be paid directly to the Mortgagee.
9. UCC Filings. If the related Mortgaged Property is operated as a hospitality property, Seller has filed and/or recorded or caused to be filed and/or recorded (or, if not filed and/or recorded, has submitted or caused to be submitted in proper form for filing and/or recording), UCC financing statements in the appropriate public filing and/or recording offices necessary at the time of the origination of the Mortgage Loan to perfect a valid security interest in all items of physical personal property reasonably necessary to operate such Mortgaged Property owned by such Mortgagor and located on the related Mortgaged Property (other than any non-material personal property, any personal property subject to a purchase money security interest, a sale and leaseback financing arrangement as permitted under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents or any other personal property leases applicable to such personal property), to the extent perfection may be effected pursuant to applicable law by recording or filing, as the case may be. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each related Mortgage (or equivalent document) creates a valid and enforceable lien and security interest on the items of personalty described above. No representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of UCC financing statements are required in order to effect such perfection.
10. Condition of Property. Seller or the originator of the Mortgage Loan inspected or caused to be inspected each related Mortgaged Property within six months of origination of the Mortgage Loan and within twelve months of the Cut-off Date.
An engineering report or property condition assessment was prepared in connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan no more than twelve months prior to the Cut-off Date. To Seller’s knowledge, based solely upon due diligence customarily performed in connection with the origination of comparable mortgage loans, as of the Closing Date, each related Mortgaged Property was free and clear of any material damage (other than (i) deferred maintenance for which escrows were established at origination and (ii) any damage fully covered by insurance) that would affect materially and adversely the use or value of such Mortgaged Property as security for the Mortgage Loan.
11. Taxes and Assessments. All taxes, governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges (including, without limitation, water and sewage charges), or installments thereof, which could be a lien on the related Mortgaged Property that would be of equal or superior priority to the lien of the Mortgage and that prior to the Cut-off Date have become delinquent in respect of each related Mortgaged Property have been paid, or an escrow of funds has been established in an amount sufficient to cover such payments and reasonably estimated interest and penalties, if any, thereon. For purposes of this representation and warranty, real estate taxes and governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges and installments thereof shall not be considered delinquent until the earlier of (a) the date on which interest and/or penalties would first be payable thereon and (b) the date on which enforcement action is entitled to be taken by the related taxing authority.
D-1-4
12. Condemnation. As of the date of origination and to Seller’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding pending, and, to Seller’s knowledge as of the date of origination and as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding threatened, for the total or partial condemnation of such Mortgaged Property that would have a material adverse effect on the value, use or operation of the Mortgaged Property.
13. Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan. As of the date of origination and to Seller’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, there was no pending or filed action, suit or proceeding, arbitration or governmental investigation involving any Mortgagor, guarantor or Mortgagor’s interest in the Mortgaged Property, an adverse outcome of which would reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect (a) such Mortgagor’s title to the Mortgaged Property, (b) the validity or enforceability of the Mortgage, (c) such Mortgagor’s ability to perform under the related Mortgage Loan, (d) such guarantor’s ability to perform under the related guaranty, (e) the principal benefit of the security intended to be provided by the Mortgage Loan documents or (f) the current principal use of the Mortgaged Property.
14. Escrow Deposits. All escrow deposits and escrow payments required to be escrowed with lender pursuant to each Mortgage Loan (including any capital improvements and environmental remediation reserves) are in the possession, or under the control, of Seller or its servicer, and there are no deficiencies or delinquencies (subject to any applicable grace or cure periods) in connection therewith, and all such escrows and deposits (or the right thereto) that are required to be escrowed with lender under the related Mortgage Loan documents are being conveyed by Seller to Purchaser or its servicer.
15. No Holdbacks. The principal amount of the Mortgage Loan stated on the Mortgage Loan Schedule has been fully disbursed as of the Closing Date and there is no requirement for future advances thereunder (except in those cases where the full amount of the Mortgage Loan has been disbursed but a portion thereof is being held in escrow or reserve accounts pending the satisfaction of certain conditions relating to leasing, repairs, occupancy, performance or other matters with respect to the related Mortgaged Property, the Mortgagor or other considerations determined by Seller to merit such holdback).
16. Insurance. Each related Mortgaged Property is, and is required pursuant to the related Mortgage to be, insured by a property insurance policy providing coverage for loss in accordance with coverage found under a “special cause of loss form” or “all risk form” that includes replacement cost valuation issued by an insurer meeting the requirements of the related Mortgage Loan documents and having a claims-paying or financial strength rating of at least “A-:VIII” from A.M. Best Company or “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s or “A-” from S&P (collectively the “Insurance Rating Requirements”), in an amount (subject to a customary deductible) not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, and (2) the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements, furniture, furnishings, fixtures and equipment owned by the Mortgagor and included in the Mortgaged Property (with no deduction for physical depreciation), but, in any event, not less than the amount necessary, or containing such endorsements as are necessary, to avoid the operation of any coinsurance provisions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property.
Each related Mortgaged Property is also covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents, by business interruption or rental loss insurance which (subject to a customary deductible) covers a period of not less than 12 months (or with respect to each Mortgage Loan on a single asset with a principal balance of $50 million or more, 18 months).
D-1-5
If any material part of the improvements, exclusive of a parking lot, located on a Mortgaged Property is in an area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as having special flood hazards, the related Mortgagor is required to maintain insurance in an amount at least equal to the least of (A) the maximum amount available under the National Flood Insurance Program plus any such additional excess flood coverage in an amount as is generally required by prudent institutional commercial mortgage lenders originating mortgage loans for securitization, (B) the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and (C) the insurable value of the Mortgaged Property.
If the Mortgaged Property is located within 25 miles of the coast of the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic coast of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or North Carolina, the related Mortgagor is required to maintain coverage for windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or “named storms” issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements or endorsement covering damage from windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or named storms by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements, in an amount not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan and (2) the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements, furniture, furnishings, fixtures and equipment owned by the Mortgagor and included in the Mortgaged Property (with no deduction for physical depreciation), but, in any event, not less than the amount necessary or containing such endorsements as are necessary to avoid the operation of any coinsurance provisions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property.
The Mortgaged Property is covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents, by a commercial general liability insurance policy issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements including coverage for property damage, contractual damage and personal injury (including bodily injury and death) in amounts as are generally required by Seller for similar commercial and multifamily loans intended for securitization, and in any event not less than $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in the aggregate.
An architectural or engineering consultant has performed an analysis of each of the Mortgaged Properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4 in order to evaluate the structural and seismic condition of such property, for the sole purpose of assessing the probable maximum loss or scenario expected loss (“PML”) for the Mortgaged Property in the event of an earthquake. In such instance, the PML was based on a 475-year return period, an exposure period of 50 years and a 10% probability of exceedance. If the resulting report concluded that the PML would exceed 20% of the amount of the replacement costs of the improvements, earthquake insurance on such Mortgaged Property was obtained by an insurer rated at least “A:VIII” by A.M. Best Company or “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s or “A-” by S&P in an amount not less than 100% of the PML.
The Mortgage Loan documents require insurance proceeds (or an amount equal to such insurance proceeds) in respect of a property loss to be applied either (a) to the repair or restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property, with respect to all property losses in excess of 5% of the then outstanding principal amount of the related Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, the lender (or a trustee appointed by it) having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as the repair or restoration progresses, or (b) to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, together with any accrued interest thereon.
All premiums on all insurance policies referred to in this section that are required by the related Mortgage Loan documents to be paid as of the Cut-off Date have been paid, and such insurance policies name the lender under the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns as a loss payee under a mortgagee endorsement clause or, in the case of the
D-1-6
general liability insurance policy, as named or additional insured. Such insurance policies will inure to the benefit of the Trustee. Each related Mortgage Loan obligates the related Mortgagor to maintain all such insurance and, at such Mortgagor’s failure to do so, authorizes the lender to maintain such insurance at the Mortgagor’s cost and expense and to charge such Mortgagor for related premiums. All such insurance policies (other than commercial liability policies) require at least 10 days’ prior notice to the lender of termination or cancellation arising because of nonpayment of a premium and at least 30 days prior notice to the lender of termination or cancellation (or such lesser period, not less than 10 days, as may be required by applicable law) arising for any reason other than non-payment of a premium and no such notice has been received by Seller.
17. Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots. Each Mortgaged Property (a) is located on or adjacent to a public road and has direct legal access to such road, or has access via an irrevocable easement or irrevocable right of way permitting ingress and egress to/from a public road, (b) is served by or has uninhibited access rights to public or private water and sewer (or well and septic) and all required utilities, all of which are adequate for the current use of the Mortgaged Property, and (c) constitutes one or more separate tax parcels which do not include any property which is not part of the Mortgaged Property or is subject to an endorsement under the related Title Policy insuring the Mortgaged Property, or in certain cases, an application has been, or will be, made to the applicable governing authority for creation of separate tax lots, in which case the Mortgage Loan requires the Mortgagor to escrow an amount sufficient to pay taxes for the existing tax parcel of which the Mortgaged Property is a part until the separate tax lots are created.
18. No Encroachments. To Seller’s knowledge based solely on surveys obtained in connection with origination and the lender’s Title Policy (or, if such policy is not yet issued, a pro forma title policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment) obtained in connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan, all material improvements that were included for the purpose of determining the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property at the time of the origination of such Mortgage Loan are within the boundaries of the related Mortgaged Property, except encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements on adjoining parcels encroach onto the related Mortgaged Property except for encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements encroach upon any easements except for encroachments the removal of which would not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements obtained with respect to the Title Policy.
19. No Contingent Interest or Equity Participation. No Mortgage Loan has a shared appreciation feature, any other contingent interest feature or a negative amortization feature (except that an ARD Loan may provide for the accrual of the portion of interest in excess of the rate in effect prior to the Anticipated Repayment Date) or an equity participation by Seller.
20. REMIC. The Mortgage Loan is a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Code (but determined without regard to the rule in the U.S. Department of Treasury regulations (the “Treasury Regulations”) Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that treats certain defective mortgage loans as qualified mortgages), and, accordingly, (A) the issue price of the Mortgage Loan to the related Mortgagor at origination did not exceed the non-contingent principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and (B) either: (a) such Mortgage Loan is secured by an interest in real property (including permanently affixed buildings and distinct
D-1-7
structural components, such as wiring, plumbing systems and central heating and air-conditioning systems, that are integrated into such buildings, serve such buildings in their passive functions and do not produce or contribute to the production of income other than consideration for the use or occupancy of space, but excluding personal property) having a fair market value (i) at the date the Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) was originated at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) on such date or (ii) at the Closing Date at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the Mortgage Loan (or related Whole Loan) on such date, provided that for purposes hereof, the fair market value of the real property interest must first be reduced by (A) the amount of any lien on the real property interest that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (B) a proportionate amount of any lien that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan; or (b) substantially all of the proceeds of such Mortgage Loan were used to acquire, improve or protect the real property which served as the only security for such Mortgage Loan (other than a recourse feature or other third-party credit enhancement within the meaning of Section 1.860G-2(a)(1)(ii) of the Treasury Regulations). If the Mortgage Loan was “significantly modified” prior to the Closing Date so as to result in a taxable exchange under Section 1001 of the Code, it either (x) was modified as a result of the default or reasonably foreseeable default of such Mortgage Loan or (y) satisfies the provisions of either sub-clause (B)(a)(i) above (substituting the date of the last such modification for the date the Mortgage Loan was originated) or sub-clause (B)(a)(ii), including the proviso thereto. Any prepayment premium and yield maintenance charges applicable to the Mortgage Loan constitute “customary prepayment penalties” within the meaning of Section 1.860G-1(b)(2) of the Treasury Regulations. All terms used in this paragraph shall have the same meanings as set forth in the related Treasury Regulations.
21. Compliance with Certain Laws. The Mortgage Rate (exclusive of any default interest, late charges, yield maintenance charge, or prepayment premiums) of such Mortgage Loan complied as of the date of origination with, or was exempt from, applicable state or federal laws, regulations and other requirements pertaining to usury.
22. Authorized to do Business. To the extent required under applicable law, as of the Cut-off Date or as of the date that such entity held the Mortgage Note, each holder of the Mortgage Note was authorized to transact and do business in the jurisdiction in which each related Mortgaged Property is located, or the failure to be so authorized does not materially and adversely affect the enforceability of such Mortgage Loan by the Trust.
23. Trustee under Deed of Trust. With respect to each Mortgage which is a deed of trust, as of the date of origination and, to Seller’s knowledge, as of the Closing Date, a trustee, duly qualified under applicable law to serve as such, currently so serves and is named in the deed of trust or has been substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law or may be substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law by the related Mortgagee, and, except in connection with a trustee’s sale after a default by the related Mortgagor or in connection with any full or partial release of the related Mortgaged Property or security for the related Mortgage Loan, no fees are payable to such trustee except for de minimis fees paid or such fees as required by the applicable jurisdiction which are to be paid by such Mortgagor in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents.
24. Local Law Compliance. To Seller’s knowledge, based upon any of a letter from any governmental authorities, a legal opinion, an architect’s letter, a zoning consultant’s report, an endorsement to the related Title Policy, or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by Seller for similar commercial and multifamily mortgage loans intended for securitization, the improvements located on or forming part of each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan as of the date of origination of such Mortgage Loan and as of the Cut-off Date, there are no material
D-1-8
violations of applicable zoning ordinances, building codes and land laws (collectively “Zoning Regulations”) other than those which (i) are insured by the Title Policy or a law and ordinance insurance policy or (ii) would not have a material adverse effect on the Mortgage Loan. The terms of the Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor to comply in all material respects with all applicable governmental regulations, zoning and building laws.
25. Licenses and Permits. Each Mortgagor covenants in the Mortgage Loan documents that it shall keep all material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations necessary for its operation of the Mortgaged Property in full force and effect, and to Seller’s knowledge based upon a letter from any government authorities or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by Seller for similar commercial and multifamily mortgage loans intended for securitization, all such material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations are in effect. The Mortgage Loan requires the related Mortgagor to be qualified to do business in the jurisdiction in which the related Mortgaged Property is located.
26. Recourse Obligations. The Mortgage Loan documents for each Mortgage Loan provide that such Mortgage Loan (a) becomes full recourse to the Mortgagor and guarantor (which is a natural person or persons, or an entity distinct from the Mortgagor (but may be affiliated with the Mortgagor) that has assets other than equity in the related Mortgaged Property that are not de minimis) in any of the following events (or negotiated provisions of substantially similar effect): (i) if any voluntary petition for bankruptcy, insolvency, dissolution or liquidation pursuant to federal bankruptcy law, or any similar federal or state law, shall be filed by the Mortgagor; (ii) the Mortgagor or guarantor shall have colluded with (or, alternatively, solicited or caused to be solicited) other creditors to cause an involuntary bankruptcy filing with respect to the Mortgagor or (iii) voluntary transfers of either the Mortgaged Property or equity interests in the Mortgagor made in violation of the Mortgage Loan documents; and (b) contains provisions providing for recourse against the Mortgagor and guarantor (which is a natural person or persons, or an entity distinct from the Mortgagor (but may be affiliated with the Mortgagor) that has assets other than equity in the related Mortgaged Property that are not de minimis), for losses and damages sustained by reason of the following (or negotiated provisions of substantially similar effect): (i) the Mortgagor’s misappropriation of rents during the continuation of an event of default under the Mortgage Loan; (ii) the Mortgagor’s misappropriation of (A) insurance proceeds or condemnation awards or (B) security deposits or, alternatively, the failure of any security deposits to be delivered to lender upon foreclosure or action in lieu thereof (except to the extent applied in accordance with leases prior to a Mortgage Loan event of default); (iii) the Mortgagor’s fraud or intentional material misrepresentation; (iv) breaches of the environmental covenants in the Mortgage Loan documents; or (v) the Mortgagor’s commission of intentional material physical waste at the Mortgaged Property.
27. Mortgage Releases. The terms of the related Mortgage or related Mortgage Loan documents do not provide for release of any material portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage except (a) a partial release, accompanied by principal repayment, or partial Defeasance (as defined in paragraph (32) below), of not less than a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (i) 110% of the related allocated loan amount of such portion of the Mortgaged Property and (ii) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, (b) upon payment in full of such Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, (c) upon a Defeasance (as defined in paragraph (32) below), (d) releases of out-parcels that are unimproved or other portions of the Mortgaged Property which will not have a material adverse effect on the underwritten value of the Mortgaged Property and which were not afforded any material value in the appraisal obtained at the origination of the Mortgage Loan and are not necessary for
D-1-9
physical access to the Mortgaged Property or compliance with zoning requirements, or (e) as required pursuant to an order of condemnation. With respect to any partial release under the preceding clauses (a) or (d), either: (x) such release of collateral (I) would not constitute a “significant modification” of the subject Mortgage Loan within the meaning of Section 1.860G-2(b)(2) of the Treasury Regulations and (II) would not cause the subject Mortgage Loan to fail to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3)(A) of the Code; or (y) the Mortgagee or servicer can, in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents, condition such release of collateral on the related Mortgagor’s delivery of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect specified in the immediately preceding clause (x). For purposes of the preceding clause (x), if the fair market value of the real property constituting such Mortgaged Property (reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on real property that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan) after the release is not equal to at least 80% of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, outstanding after the release, the Mortgagor is required to make a payment of principal in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC Provisions.
In the case of any Mortgage Loan, in the event of a taking of any portion of a Mortgaged Property by a State or any political subdivision or authority thereof, whether by legal proceeding or by agreement, the Mortgagor can be required to pay down the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable, in an amount not less than the amount required by the loan-to-value ratio and other requirements of the REMIC Provisions and, to such extent, condemnation awards may not be required to be applied to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property or released to the Mortgagor, if, immediately after the release of such portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage (but taking into account the planned restoration) the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property (reduced by (1) the amount of any lien on the real property that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (2) a proportionate amount of any lien on real property that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan) is not equal to at least 80% of the remaining principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable.
No Mortgage Loan that is secured by more than one Mortgaged Property or that is a Crossed Mortgage Loan permits the release of cross-collateralization of the related Mortgaged Properties or a portion thereof, including due to a partial condemnation, other than in compliance with loan-to-value ratio and other requirements of the REMIC Provisions.
28. Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls. The Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor to provide the owner or holder of the Mortgage Loan with quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) and annual operating statements, and quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) rent rolls for properties that have leases contributing more than 5% of the in-place base rent and annual financial statements, which annual financial statements (i) with respect to each Mortgage Loan with more than one Mortgagor are in the form of either an individual or combined annual balance sheet of the Mortgagor entities (and no other entities), together with the related combined or individual statements of operations, members’ capital and cash flows, including a combined or individual balance sheet and statement of income for the Mortgaged Properties on a combined or individual basis and (ii) with respect to each Mortgage Loan with an original principal balance greater than $50 million shall be audited by an independent certified public accountant upon the request of the owner or holder of the Mortgage Loan.
29. Acts of Terrorism Exclusion. With respect to each Mortgage Loan over $20 million, and to Seller’s knowledge with respect to each Mortgage Loan of $20 million or less, as of origination, the related special-form all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) do not specifically
D-1-10
exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 and the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (collectively referred to as “TRIA”), from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, the related Mortgage Loan documents do not expressly waive or prohibit the Mortgagee from requiring coverage for Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, or damages related thereto except to the extent that any right to require such coverage may be limited by commercial availability on commercially reasonable terms; provided that if TRIA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then, provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the Mortgagor under each Mortgage Loan is required to carry terrorism insurance, but in such event the Mortgagor shall not be required to spend on terrorism insurance coverage more than two times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the related Mortgage Loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such casualty and business interruption/rental loss insurance) at the time of the origination of the Mortgage Loan, and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, the Mortgagor is required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount.
30. Due-on-Sale or Encumbrance. Subject to specific exceptions set forth below, each Mortgage Loan contains a “due-on-sale” or other such provision for the acceleration of the payment of the unpaid principal balance of such Mortgage Loan if, without the consent of the holder of the Mortgage (which consent, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld) and/or complying with the requirements of the related Mortgage Loan documents (which provide for transfers without the consent of the lender which are customarily acceptable to Seller lending on the security of property comparable to the related Mortgaged Property, including, without limitation, transfers of worn-out or obsolete furnishings, fixtures, or equipment promptly replaced with property of equivalent value and functionality and transfers by leases entered into in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents), (a) the related Mortgaged Property, or any equity interest of greater than 50% in the related Mortgagor, is directly or indirectly pledged, transferred or sold, other than as related to (i) family and estate planning transfers or transfers upon death or legal incapacity, (ii) transfers to certain affiliates as defined in the related Mortgage Loan documents, (iii) transfers of less than, or other than, a controlling interest in the related Mortgagor, (iv) transfers to another holder of direct or indirect equity in the Mortgagor, a specific Person designated in the related Mortgage Loan documents or a Person satisfying specific criteria identified in the related Mortgage Loan documents, such as a qualified equityholder, (v) transfers of stock or similar equity units in publicly traded companies or (vi) a substitution or release of collateral within the parameters of paragraphs (27) and (32) herein or the exceptions thereto set forth in Annex D-2 attached to this prospectus, or (vii) by reason of any mezzanine debt that existed at the origination of the related Mortgage Loan, or future permitted mezzanine debt, in any event as set forth on the applicable tables under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Additional Indebtedness—Mezzanine Indebtedness” or (b) the related Mortgaged Property is encumbered with a subordinate lien or security interest against the related Mortgaged Property, other than (i) any Serviced Companion Loan or Non-Serviced Companion Loan or any subordinate debt that existed at origination and is permitted under the related Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) purchase money security interests, (iii) any Crossed Mortgage Loan, as set forth on Annex A-1 to this prospectus or (iv) Permitted Encumbrances. The Mortgage or other Mortgage Loan documents provide that to the extent any Rating Agency fees are incurred in connection with the review of and consent to any transfer or encumbrance, the Mortgagor is
D-1-11
responsible for such payment along with all other reasonable fees and expenses incurred by the Mortgagee relative to such transfer or encumbrance.
31. Single-Purpose Entity. The Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor to be a Single-Purpose Entity for at least as long as the Mortgage Loan is outstanding. Both the Mortgage Loan documents and the organizational documents of the Mortgagor with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance in excess of $5 million provide that the Mortgagor is a Single-Purpose Entity, and each Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Balance of $30 million or more has a counsel’s opinion regarding non-consolidation of the Mortgagor. For this purpose, a “Single-Purpose Entity” shall mean an entity, other than an individual, whose organizational documents (or if the Mortgage Loan has a Cut-off Date Balance equal to $5 million or less, its organizational documents or the related Mortgage Loan documents) provide substantially to the effect that it was formed or organized solely for the purpose of owning and operating one or more of the Mortgaged Properties securing the Mortgage Loans and prohibit it from engaging in any business unrelated to such Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, and whose organizational documents further provide, or which entity represented in the related Mortgage Loan documents, substantially to the effect that it does not have any assets other than those related to its interest in and operation of such Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, or any indebtedness other than as permitted by the related Mortgage(s) or the other related Mortgage Loan documents, that it has its own books and records and accounts separate and apart from those of any other person (other than a Mortgagor for a Crossed Mortgage Loan), and that it holds itself out as a legal entity, separate and apart from any other person or entity.
32. Defeasance. With respect to any Mortgage Loan that, pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, can be defeased (a “Defeasance”), (i) the Mortgage Loan documents provide for Defeasance as a unilateral right of the Mortgagor, subject to satisfaction of conditions specified in the Mortgage Loan documents; (ii) the Mortgage Loan cannot be defeased within two years after the Closing Date; (iii) the Mortgagor is permitted to pledge only United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 1.860G-2(a)(8)(ii) of the Treasury Regulations, the revenues from which will, in the case of a full Defeasance, be sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the Mortgage Loan when due, including the entire remaining principal balance on the maturity date (or on or after the first date on which payment may be made without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment penalty) or, if the Mortgage Loan is an ARD Loan, the entire principal balance outstanding on the Anticipated Repayment Date (or on or after the first date on which payment may be made without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment penalty), and if the Mortgage Loan permits partial releases of real property in connection with partial Defeasance, the revenues from the collateral will be sufficient to pay all such scheduled payments calculated on a principal amount equal to a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (a) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the real property to be released and (b) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or Whole Loan, as applicable; (iv) the defeasance collateral is not permitted to be subject to prepayment, call, or early redemption that results in revenues from such collateral that are insufficient to pay all applicable payments described in clause (iii) above; (v) the Mortgagor is required to provide a certification from an independent certified public accountant that the defeasance collateral is sufficient to make all applicable payments described in clause (iii) above; (vi) if the Mortgagor would continue to own assets in addition to the defeasance collateral, the portion of the Mortgage Loan secured by defeasance collateral is required to be assumed (or the Mortgagee may require such assumption) by a Single-Purpose Entity; (vii) the Mortgagor is required to provide an opinion of counsel that the Mortgagee has a perfected security interest in such collateral prior to any other claim or interest; and (viii) the Mortgagor is required to pay all rating agency fees associated with Defeasance (if rating
D-1-12
confirmation is a specific condition precedent thereto) and all other reasonable expenses associated with Defeasance, including, but not limited to, accountant’s fees and opinions of counsel.
33. Fixed Interest Rates. Each Mortgage Loan bears interest at a rate that remains fixed throughout the remaining term of such Mortgage Loan, except in the case of ARD loans and situations where default interest is imposed.
34. Ground Leases. For purposes of this Annex D-1, a “Ground Lease” shall mean a lease creating a leasehold estate in real property where the fee owner as the ground lessor conveys for a term or terms of years its entire interest in the land (or, with respect to air rights leases, the air) and buildings and other improvements, if any, comprising the premises demised under such lease to the ground lessee (who may, in certain circumstances, own the building and improvements on the land), subject to the reversionary interest of the ground lessor as fee owner and does not include industrial development agency or similar leases for purposes of conferring a tax abatement or other benefit.
With respect to any Mortgage Loan where the Mortgage Loan is secured by a leasehold estate under a Ground Lease in whole or in part, and the related Mortgage does not also encumber the related lessor’s fee interest in such Mortgaged Property, based upon the terms of the Ground Lease and any estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor in favor of Seller, its successors and assigns, Seller represents and warrants that:
(a) The Ground Lease or a memorandum regarding such Ground Lease has been duly recorded or submitted for recordation in a form that is acceptable for recording in the applicable jurisdiction. The Ground Lease or an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor permits the interest of the lessee to be encumbered by the related Mortgage and does not restrict the use of the related Mortgaged Property by such lessee, its successors or assigns in a manner that would materially adversely affect the security provided by the related Mortgage. No material change in the terms of the Ground Lease had occurred since its recordation, except by any written instruments which are included in the related Mortgage File;
(b) The lessor under such Ground Lease has agreed in a writing included in the related Mortgage File (or in such Ground Lease or an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor) that the Ground Lease may not be amended or modified, or canceled or terminated by agreement of lessor and lessee, without the prior written consent of the lender, and no such consent has been granted by Seller since the origination of the Mortgage Loan except as reflected in any written instruments which are included in the related Mortgage File;
(c) The Ground Lease has an original term (or an original term plus one or more optional renewal terms, which, under all circumstances, may be exercised, and will be enforceable, by either Mortgagor or the Mortgagee) that extends not less than 20 years beyond the stated maturity of the related Mortgage Loan, or 10 years past the stated maturity if such Mortgage Loan fully amortizes by the stated maturity (or with respect to a Mortgage Loan that accrues on an actual 360 basis, substantially amortizes);
(d) The Ground Lease either (i) is not subject to any liens or encumbrances superior to, or of equal priority with, the Mortgage, except for the related fee interest of the ground lessor and the Permitted Encumbrances, or (ii) is subject to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement to which the Mortgagee on the lessor’s fee interest in the Mortgaged Property is subject;
D-1-13
(e) The Ground Lease does not place commercially unreasonable restrictions on the identity of the Mortgagee and the Ground Lease is assignable (including pursuant to foreclosure) to the holder of the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of the lessor thereunder (or, if such consent is required it either has been obtained or cannot be unreasonably withheld, provided that such Ground Lease has not been terminated and all amounts due thereunder have been paid), and in the event it is so assigned, it is further assignable by the holder of the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of the lessor (or, if such consent is required it either has been obtained or cannot be unreasonably withheld, provided that such Ground Lease has not been terminated and all amounts due thereunder have been paid);
(f) Seller has not received any written notice of material default under or notice of termination of such Ground Lease. To Seller’s knowledge, there is no material default under such Ground Lease and no condition that, but for the passage of time or giving of notice, would result in a material default under the terms of such Ground Lease and to Seller’s knowledge, such Ground Lease is in full force and effect as of the Closing Date;
(g) The Ground Lease or ancillary agreement between the lessor and the lessee requires the lessor to give to the lender written notice of any default, and provides that no notice of default or termination is effective against the lender unless such notice is given to the lender;
(h) A lender is permitted a reasonable opportunity (including, where necessary, sufficient time to gain possession of the interest of the lessee under the Ground Lease through legal proceedings) to cure any default under the Ground Lease which is curable after the lender’s receipt of notice of any default before the lessor may terminate the Ground Lease;
(i) The Ground Lease does not impose any restrictions on subletting that would be viewed as commercially unreasonable by Seller in connection with the origination of similar commercial or multifamily loans intended for securitization;
(j) Under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds or the portion of the condemnation award allocable to the ground lessee’s interest (other than (i) de minimis amounts for minor casualties or (ii) in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking as addressed in clause (k) below) will be applied either to the repair or to restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property with (so long as such proceeds are in excess of the threshold amount specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents) the lender or a trustee appointed by it having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as repair or restoration progresses, or to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest;
(k) In the case of a total or substantially total taking or loss, under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds, or portion of the condemnation award allocable to ground lessee’s interest in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking of the related Mortgaged Property to the extent not applied to restoration, will be applied first to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest; and
(l) Provided that the lender cures any defaults which are susceptible to being cured, the ground lessor has agreed to enter into a new lease with lender upon termination of the
D-1-14
Ground Lease for any reason, including rejection of the Ground Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding.
35. Servicing. The servicing and collection practices used by Seller with respect to the Mortgage Loan have been, in all respects, legal and have met customary industry standards for servicing of commercial loans for conduit loan programs.
36. Origination and Underwriting. The origination practices of Seller (or the related originator if Seller was not the originator) with respect to each Mortgage Loan have been, in all material respects, legal and as of the date of its origination, such Mortgage Loan and the origination thereof complied in all material respects with, or was exempt from, all requirements of federal, state or local law relating to the origination of such Mortgage Loan; provided that such representation and warranty does not address or otherwise cover any matters with respect to federal, state or local law otherwise covered in this Annex D-1.
37. No Material Default; Payment Record. No Mortgage Loan has been more than 30 days delinquent, without giving effect to any grace or cure period, in making required payments since origination, and as of the date hereof, no Mortgage Loan is more than 30 days delinquent (beyond any applicable grace or cure period) in making required payments as of the Closing Date. To Seller’s knowledge, there is (a) no material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration existing under the related Mortgage Loan, or (b) no event (other than payments due but not yet delinquent) which, with the passage of time or with notice and the expiration of any grace or cure period, would constitute a material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, which default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, in the case of either clause (a) or clause (b), materially and adversely affects the value of the Mortgage Loan or the value, use or operation of the related Mortgaged Property, provided that this representation and warranty does not cover any default, breach, violation or event of acceleration that specifically pertains to or arises out of an exception scheduled to any other representation and warranty made by Seller in this Annex D-1. No person other than the holder of such Mortgage Loan may declare any event of default under the Mortgage Loan or accelerate any indebtedness under the Mortgage Loan documents.
38. Bankruptcy. As of the date of origination of the related Mortgage Loan and to Seller’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, neither the Mortgaged Property (other than any tenants of such Mortgaged Property), nor any portion thereof, is the subject of, and no Mortgagor, guarantor or tenant occupying a single-tenant property is a debtor in state or federal bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding.
39. Organization of Mortgagor. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, in reliance on certified copies of the organizational documents of the Mortgagor delivered by the Mortgagor in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan, the Mortgagor is an entity organized under the laws of a state of the United States of America, the District of Columbia or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Except with respect to any Crossed Mortgage Loan, no Mortgage Loan has a Mortgagor that is an Affiliate of another Mortgagor. An “Affiliate” for purposes of this paragraph (39) means, a Mortgagor that is under direct or indirect common ownership and control with another Mortgagor.
40. Environmental Conditions. A Phase I environmental site assessment (or update of a previous Phase I and or Phase II environmental site assessment) and, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, a Phase II environmental site assessment (collectively, an “ESA”) meeting ASTM requirements conducted by a reputable environmental consultant in connection with such Mortgage Loan within 12 months prior to its origination date (or an update of a previous ESA was prepared), and such ESA (i) did not identify the existence of
D-1-15
Recognized Environmental Conditions (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-05 or its successor, hereinafter “Environmental Condition”) at the related Mortgaged Property or the need for further investigation, or (ii) if the existence of an Environmental Condition or need for further investigation was indicated in any such ESA, then at least one of the following statements is true: (A) an amount reasonably estimated by a reputable environmental consultant to be sufficient to cover the estimated cost to cure any material noncompliance with applicable Environmental Laws or the Environmental Condition has been escrowed by the related Mortgagor and is held or controlled by the related lender; (B) if the only Environmental Condition relates to the presence of asbestos-containing materials, radon in indoor air, lead based paint or lead in drinking water, the only recommended action in the ESA is the institution of such a plan, an operations or maintenance plan has been required to be instituted by the related Mortgagor that can reasonably be expected to mitigate the identified risk; (C) the Environmental Condition identified in the related environmental report was remediated, abated or contained in all material respects prior to the date hereof, and, if and as appropriate, a no further action, completion or closure letter or its equivalent, was obtained from the applicable governmental regulatory authority (or the Environmental Condition affecting the related Mortgaged Property was otherwise listed by such governmental authority as “closed” or a reputable environmental consultant has concluded that no further action or investigation is required); (D) an environmental policy or a lender’s pollution legal liability insurance policy that covers liability for the Environmental Condition was obtained from an insurer rated no less than “A-” (or the equivalent) by Moody’s, S&P and/or Fitch; (E) a party not related to the Mortgagor was identified as the responsible party for the Environmental Condition and such responsible party has financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation; or (F) a party related to the Mortgagor having financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation is required to take action. To Seller’s knowledge, except as set forth in the ESA, there is no Environmental Condition at the related Mortgaged Property.
41. Appraisal. The Mortgage File contains an appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property with an appraisal date within 6 months of the Mortgage Loan origination date, and within 12 months of the Closing Date. The appraisal is signed by an appraiser who is a Member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) and that (i) was engaged directly by the originator of the Mortgage Loan or Seller, or a correspondent or agent of the originator of the Mortgage Loan or Seller, and (ii) to Seller’s knowledge, had no interest, direct or indirect, in the Mortgaged Property or the Mortgagor or in any loan made on the security thereof, and whose compensation is not affected by the approval or disapproval of the Mortgage Loan. Each appraiser has represented in such appraisal or in a supplemental letter that the appraisal satisfies the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation.
42. Mortgage Loan Schedule. The information pertaining to each Mortgage Loan which is set forth in the Mortgage Loan Schedule attached as an exhibit to the related MLPA is true and correct in all material respects as of the Cut-off Date and contains all information required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to be contained therein.
43. Cross-Collateralization. No Mortgage Loan is cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted with any other mortgage loan that is outside the Trust, except (i) as set forth on Exhibit C-32-3 to the related MLPA and (ii) any Companion Loan secured by the same Mortgage as the related Mortgage Loan.
44. Advance of Funds by Seller. After origination, no advance of funds has been made by Seller to the related Mortgagor other than in accordance with the Mortgage Loan documents, and, to Seller’s knowledge, no funds have been received from any person other than the related Mortgagor or an affiliate for, or on account of, payments due on the
D-1-16
Mortgage Loan (other than as contemplated by the Mortgage Loan documents, such as, by way of example and not in limitation of the foregoing, amounts paid by the tenant(s) into a lender-controlled lockbox if required or contemplated under the related lease or Mortgage Loan documents). Neither Seller nor any affiliate thereof has any obligation to make any capital contribution to any Mortgagor under a Mortgage Loan, other than contributions made on or prior to the date hereof.
45. Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering Laws. Seller has complied in all material respects with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including without limitation the USA Patriot Act of 2001 with respect to the origination of the Mortgage Loan, the failure to comply with which would have a material adverse effect on the Mortgage Loan.
For purposes of these representations and warranties, the phrases “Seller’s knowledge” or “Seller’s belief” and other words and phrases of like import shall mean, except where otherwise expressly set forth herein, the actual state of knowledge or belief of Seller, its officers and employees directly responsible for the underwriting, origination, servicing or sale of the Mortgage Loans regarding the matters expressly set forth herein.
D-1-17
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
ANNEX D-2
EXCEPTIONS TO MORTGAGE LOAN REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
UBS AG
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan | AFIN Portfolio (Loan No. 1) | The guarantor is a defendant in a stockholder derivative action filed on January 13, 2017, related to the merger of the guarantor and an entity under common control. The plaintiffs are seeking, among other things, rescission of the merger and unspecified monetary damages. | ||
(16) Insurance | Dorset & Market Street (Loan No. 34) | Insurance policies are required to be issued by insurance companies having a rating of “A-” or better by S&P and “A: X” or better by A.M. Best. Umbrella liability insurance must be maintained in an amount not less than $5 million per occurrence. | ||
(16) Insurance | Holiday Inn Express –Ruston (Loan No. 40) | Insurance policies are required to be issued by insurance companies rated “A” or better by S&P and “A2” or better by Moody’s if they are rating the Certificates, or if only one Rating Agency is rating the Certificates, then only by such Rating Agency.
The Mortgagor is permitted to maintain insurance coverage with Rockhill Insurance Company in its current participation amount, provided that the A.M. Best rating of Rockhill Insurance Company is not withdrawn or downgraded below the rating in effect as of the Mortgage Loan origination date, the Mortgagor replaces Rockhill Insurance Company with an insurance company meeting the rating requirements set forth above. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | AFIN Portfolio (Loan No. 1) | The second largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A-1 as Montecito Crossing provides, among other things, veterinary services which is a legal non-conforming use that is not permitted under current zoning laws without a special use permit. In the event of a casualty affecting more than 50% of the replacement value of the Mortgaged Property, the non-conforming use may not be continued without the issuance of such special use permit. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers (Loan No. 22) | The building located at 305-315 East 86th Street was granted a zoning variance to use 50 parking spaces at the Mortgaged Property as transient parking spaces. Pursuant to the variance, the certificate of occupancy for the Mortgaged Property is required to be updated to reference the variance and the permitted transient parking spaces. Mortgagor has a post-closing obligation to update the certificate of occupancy for this purpose. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | A Storage Place - Evergreen (Loan No. 36) |
Three tenants at the Mortgaged Property do not have certificates of occupancy. The municipal planning department permits the tenants to operate while the certificates of occupancy are obtained, and the loan agreement contains covenants requiring the Mortgagor to apply for and file all documentation required to cause the issuance of such certificates within 60 days of loan origination and diligently pursue the issuance of such certificates. The Mortgage Loan is recourse for losses for failure to have any required certificate of occupancy and/or |
D-2-1
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
for failure to comply with the covenant to apply for and pursue the certificates of occupancy. | ||||
(26) Recourse Obligations | Tryad Industrial and Business Center (Loan No. 2) | There is no loss carve-out for environmental covenants. There is a separate environmental indemnity agreement. | ||
(26) Recourse Obligations | Yorkshire & Lexington Towers (Loan No. 22) | Recourse for fraud is limited to fraud in connection with the execution and delivery of the Mortgage Loan documents, or any certificate, report, financial statement or other document or instrument prepared by or on behalf of the Mortgagor, guarantor or any of their affiliates, and furnished to the lender by or on behalf of Mortgagor, guarantor or any direct or any of their affiliates at origination or during the term of the Mortgage Loan.
Recourse for commission of waste is limited to any material physical waste at the Mortgaged Property caused by the intentional or willful acts or omissions of the Mortgagor, guarantor or any of their affiliates resulting from insufficient cash flow from the operation of the Mortgaged Property to prevent such waste at the Mortgaged Property. | ||
(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Roll | Tryad Industrial and Business Center (Loan No. 2) | Financial statements of the Mortgagor are only audited at the lender’s request during the continuance of an event of default. The guarantor’s financials are not required to be audited. | ||
(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | A Storage Place - Evergreen (Loan No. 36) | If TRIPRA is no longer in effect, the Mortgagor is not required to pay insurance premiums for terrorism insurance in excess of an amount equal to 150% of the annual premium paid at origination (the “Terrorism Premium Cap”). The Terrorism Premium Cap will be adjusted annually based on the producer price index. | ||
(34) Ground Leases | Tryad Industrial and Business Center (Loan No. 2) | The Mortgage Loan documents include an Industrial Development Agency (“IDA”) Ground Lease and an IDA Subleases. The Mortgagor owns the fee and the mortgage contains a joinder executed by the IDA. IDAs position can be foreclosed out in connection with an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents. | ||
(39) Organization of Mortgagor | AFIN Portfolio (Loan No. 1) | The Mortgagor is affiliated with the Mortgagor under the Mortgage Loan known as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio, which Mortgage Loan is being sold to the Trust by Barclays Bank PLC. |
D-2-2
Ladder Capital Finance LLC
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(5) Lien; Valid Assignment | City Square and Clay Street (Loan No. 7) |
The subject Mortgage Loan is a part of a Whole Loan that will initially be serviced under the UBS 2018-C8 pooling and servicing agreement; however, upon the securitization of the related controlling note, servicing of the subject Whole Loan will shift to the pooling and servicing agreement for such applicable future securitization. Accordingly, there may be no assignment of Mortgage or assignment of any related Assignment of Leases to the Trustee, and such assignments will ultimately run to the trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the securitization of the related controlling note. | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | City Square and Clay Street (Loan No. 7) |
The related Mortgage secures the entire related Whole Loan. | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | GNL Industrial Portfolio (Loan No. 11) |
The related sole tenant at the GNL Industrial Portfolio – 10088 South 136th Street Mortgaged Property has a right of first refusal to purchase the related Mortgaged Property on the terms set forth in a bona fide written offer received by the related Mortgagor from any third party. The right of first refusal does not apply to a foreclosure or similar sale of the related Mortgaged Property by any holder of a mortgage on the related Mortgaged Property or to the granting of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure to such holder and will not apply to the subsequent sale of the related Mortgaged Property by a purchaser of the related Mortgaged Property at a foreclosure or a similar sale or by the grantee of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Kohl’s Neenah (Loan No. 47) |
The related Mortgagor’s seller has the exclusive option to purchase a designated unimproved outparcel of the related Mortgaged Property for a purchase price of $1.00 at any time within 15 years of the origination date of the subject Mortgage Loan. | ||
(8) Assignment of Leases and Rents | City Square and Clay Street (Loan No. 7) |
The related Assignment of Leases secures the entire related Whole Loan. | ||
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan | City Square and Clay Street (Loan No. 7) |
A tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, Active Acquisition Partners, LLC (“Active”), is currently in litigation in the Superior Court of the State of California with one of the related Mortgagors (“STG”) and the related guarantor, regarding common area maintenance (“CAM”) payments. Active asserted claims for fraud, breach of contract, declaratory relief, and unfair business practices, asserting that STG was improperly characterizing certain capital and other expenses as CAM charges, and seeking to recover a percentage of these amounts from Active. Active also sought a preliminary injunction to prevent STG from assessing any CAM charges relating to certain plumbing work, as STG sought to collect $354,939 from Active. The request for a preliminary injunction was denied on December 8, 2016. On October 26, 2017, the court granted Active’s motion to compel STG to produce documents and a privilege log and sanctioned STG $5,250 (allowed attorneys’ fees for Active’s counsel). At origination of the subject Mortgage Loan, $300,000 was reserved to cover any potential monetary judgment against STG or any settlement entered into by Active and STG. In the event that $300,000 does not cover any judgment against STG, cash flow from the related |
D-2-3
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
Mortgaged Property will be swept into a lender-controlled account until the judgment is satisfied. If the judgment is in favor of STG, any amounts in the litigation reserve will be released to the related Mortgagors.
In addition, the related guarantor under the subject Mortgage Loan has been audited by the Internal Revenue Service recently based on actions surrounding a 1031 exchange in 2012. The audit involves a proposed disallowance of a rental real estate loss from an S corporation in which the related guarantor owned a 50% interest in 2012. The maximum exposure is less than $1 million.
| ||||
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan | Firehouse Self Storage (Loan No. 26) |
One of the related guarantors is involved in a pending lawsuit that arose following the sale by such guarantor of a winery. Counsel for such guarantor states that the purchaser of the winery defaulted on the payments owed to the guarantor in excess of $20 million, and thereafter filed suit against the guarantor, alleging failure to disclose an alleged problem with some of the wines. The pending lawsuit involves claims and counterclaims in the millions of dollars.
| ||
(14) Escrow Deposits | GNL Industrial Portfolio (Loan No. 11) |
The escrow reserve related to the deferred maintenance with respect to the GNL Industrial Portfolio - 12 Mechanic Street Mortgaged Property is held by the related title company and not the lender.
| ||
(14) Escrow Deposits | Harford Village MHC (Loan No. 14) |
The escrow reserve related to the environmental work to be completed at the related Mortgaged Property is held by the related title company and not the lender. The related title company holds the reserve for the completion of environmental testing and remediation, and the related escrow agreement was collaterally assigned to the lender. The related Mortgagor cannot make a draw under the escrow without the lender’s prior determination that the Mortgagor has complied with the related environmental provisions in the related loan agreement.
In addition, two additional escrow reserves are held by the related title company: an escrow reserve for payment of any obligations that the related Mortgaged Property’s seller may have to the related Mortgagor under the purchase contract (e.g., representation and warranty breaches, etc.); and an escrow reserve for payment of transfer taxes if the state determines that the related Mortgagor must pay transfer taxes in connection with its purchase of the ownership interests in the property owner (instead of buying the related Mortgaged Property from the owner).
| ||
(14) Escrow Deposits | Birches at Countryside (Loan No. 46) |
A separate escrow reserve is held by the related title company to cover potential costs to install sidewalks at the related Mortgaged Property. A collateral assignment of the related escrow agreement in favor of the lender was executed at origination of the subject Mortgage Loan.
| ||
(16) Insurance | All Mortgage Loans transferred by LCF | Except with respect to Mortgage Loans where terrorism insurance is not required or where a tenant is permitted to self-insure, if any of the Policies (as defined in the related loan agreement) contain exclusions for loss, cost, damage or liability caused by “terrorism” or “terrorist acts” (“Acts of Terrorism”), the related Mortgagor must obtain and maintain terrorism coverage to cover such exclusions from an insurer |
D-2-4
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements specified in Representation and Warranty No. 16 (a “Qualified Insurer”) or, in the event that such terrorism coverage is not available from a Qualified Insurer, the related Mortgagor must obtain such terrorism coverage from the highest rated insurance company providing such terrorism coverage.
In addition, subject to the other exceptions to Representation and Warranty No. 16, even where terrorism insurance is required, the related Mortgagor may not be required to pay more for terrorism insurance coverage than a specified percentage (at least equal to 200%) of the amount of the insurance premium for the property insurance policy required under the related loan documents (excluding such terrorism coverage and coverage for other catastrophe perils such as flood, windstorm and earthquake), and if the cost of such terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, then the related Mortgagor is only required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount.
Even if any material part of the improvements, exclusive of a parking lot, located on the related Mortgaged Property is in an area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as having special flood hazards, the related loan documents do not require “any such additional excess flood coverage in an amount as is generally required by prudent institutional commercial mortgage lenders originating mortgage loans for securitization”, provided, however, that the related loan documents do require “such greater amount as Lender shall require” in excess of the maximum amount available under the National Flood Insurance Program.
Subject to the other exceptions to Representation and Warranty No. 16, the related loan documents may require that, if insurance proceeds in respect of a property loss are to be applied to the repair or restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property, then the insurance proceeds may be held by a party other than the lender (or a trustee appointed by it) if such proceeds are less than or equal to 5% of the original principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan, rather than 5% of the then outstanding principal amount of the related Mortgage Loan.
| ||||
(16) Insurance | Kohl’s Neenah (Loan No. 47) |
The related Mortgagor’s obligation to provide required insurance (including property (other than contingent property coverage), terrorism and liability coverage) is suspended if the related sole tenant elects to provide third party insurance or self-insure in accordance with its lease. The related sole tenant is permitted to self-insure under its lease if, among other things, such tenant maintains (i) an “investment grade” credit rating from two (2) rating agencies (defined as “the senior unsecured debt rating for such tenant or such tenant’s parent company being not less than ‘BBB-’ by S&P, ‘BBB-’ by Fitch or ‘Baa3’ by Moody’s” and (ii) a net worth of at least $100 million.
The related sole tenant’s lease permits the tenant to abate rent to the extent that the leased premises are unusable following casualty, and to terminate the lease if the casualty damage affects 50% or more of the leased premises and the time to restore, as estimated by tenant, is greater than 210 days. If the related sole tenant’s lease is in full force and |
D-2-5
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
effect, the provisions of such lease will control disbursement of any casualty proceeds.
As of origination, the related sole tenant is providing third-party insurance for lease-required coverages, including, among other things, property insurance and liability insurance, subject in each case to a $250,000 deductible. Third-party insurers providing lease-required coverages must have a minimum A.M. Best policyholder’s rating of at least B+/X, and the lease-required coverages may not satisfy the requirements of Representation and Warranty No. 16. The related Mortgagor is, however, obligated to provide contingent property insurance and 12 months of business interruption coverage.
| ||||
(16) Insurance | Dollar General Winterset
Dollar General Bay City
Dollar General Rockford
|
With respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Property is leased to a single tenant. To the extent (i) the related lease is in full force and effect, (ii) no default beyond any applicable notice and cure period has occurred and is continuing under the related lease, (iii) the related sole tenant is permitted per the terms of its lease to rebuild and/or repair the related Mortgaged Property and is entitled to no period of rent abatement, and (iv) the related sole tenant maintains the insurance required to be maintained by it under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement or as otherwise approved by the lender in writing, the related Mortgagor will not be required to maintain coverage otherwise required under Section 5.1.1 of the related loan agreement.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary described in the prior paragraph: (A) if, at any time and from time to time during the term of the subject Mortgage Loan, the insurance policies maintained by the related sole tenant as of the date of the related loan agreement are modified to decrease the type or amount of coverage below that required under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement, or if, at any time and from time to time during the term of the subject Mortgage Loan, the insurance policies maintained by the related sole tenant under its lease are obtained from and maintained with an insurance company that is rated below “A-:VIII” by A.M. Best Company (the “Minimum Insurer Ratings”), then in either such case the related Mortgagor is required, upon obtaining knowledge thereof, to promptly procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, with an insurance company that at least satisfies the Minimum Insurer Ratings (and promptly notify the lender in writing of such change in the related sole tenant’s coverage and of the coverage procured by the related Mortgagor) either (x) “primary” insurance coverage of the types and for the amounts required under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement in the event that the related sole tenant does not provide the applicable insurance coverage required under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement or in the event the related sole tenant maintains such coverage with an insurance company that does not satisfy the Minimum Insurer Ratings or (y) “excess and contingent” insurance coverage of the types and for the amounts required under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement in the event that the related sole tenant does not provide sufficient insurance coverage required under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement or in the event the related sole tenant |
D-2-6
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
maintains such coverage with an insurance company that does not satisfy the Minimum Insurer Ratings, in each case, in “concurrent form” with the policies obtained pursuant to the related lease, over and above any other valid and collectible coverage then in existence, as will be necessary to bring the insurance coverage for the related Mortgaged Property to at least the types and amount of coverage required under the related lease as of the date of the related loan agreement; and/or (B) if, at any time and from time to time during the term of the subject Mortgage Loan, the insurance policies maintained by the related sole tenant under the related lease fail to name the lender as an additional insured or beneficiary, as the case may be, the related Mortgagor is required to maintain such insurance policies, regardless of whether such insurance is maintained by the related sole tenant under the related lease.
The insurance requirements under the related lease covering the related Mortgaged Property may not satisfy the requirements of Representation and Warranty No. 16.
| ||||
(17) Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots | Seal Multifamily Portfolio (Loan No. 27) |
A certain unimproved parcel of the related Norton and Barberton Mortgaged Property does not have access to a public way.
| ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | City Square and Clay Street
GNL Industrial Portfolio
Seal Multifamily Portfolio
Las Brisas MHC
Birches at Countryside
Brooklyn Multifamily Portfolio
East Sac Self Storage
|
For each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Property constitutes (or, in the case of a portfolio of related Mortgaged Properties, one or more of the related Mortgaged Properties constitute) a legal non-conforming use or structure which, following a casualty or destruction, may not be restored or repaired to the full extent necessary to maintain the pre-casualty/pre-destruction use of the subject structure/property if the replacement cost exceeds a specified threshold and/or the restoration or repair is not completed or the pre-casualty/pre-destruction use is not restored (or certain key steps in connection therewith are not taken) within a specified time frame. In each case, law and ordinance insurance coverage was obtained, but such insurance only covers (i) the loss to the subject structure when it must be demolished to comply with code requirements, (ii) the cost to demolish and clear the site of the undamaged portions of the covered structure, where the law requires its demolition, and (iii) increased cost of construction, to the extent such cost is a consequence of the enforcement of an ordinance or law. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | Firehouse Self Storage (Loan No. 26) |
The related Mortgaged Property is subject to open building and zoning code violations; however, the county has agreed to permit the related Mortgagor to cure the violations at the north parcel of the related Mortgaged Property by October 31, 2019, and at the south parcel by March 31, 2018, and to refrain from enforcement action during such time.
| ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | Seal Multifamily Portfolio (Loan No. 27) |
Two of the related Mortgaged Properties have open fire code violations and one of the related Mortgaged Properties operates with a unit in excess of the approved variance.
| ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | Birches at Countryside
|
A zoning violation exists at the related Mortgaged Property for failure to install sidewalks. | ||
(25) Licenses and Permits | Firehouse Self Storage (Loan No. 26) |
The related Mortgaged Property is subject to open building and zoning code violations; however, the county has agreed to permit the related Mortgagor to cure the violations at the north parcel of the related Mortgaged Property by October |
D-2-7
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
31, 2019, and at the south parcel by March 31, 2018, and to refrain from enforcement action during such time.
| ||||
(26) Recourse Obligations | All Mortgage Loans transferred by LCF | The related loan documents may limit recourse for the related Mortgagor’s commission of intentional material physical waste only to the extent that there is sufficient cash flow from the related Mortgaged Property to make the requisite payments to prevent the waste. Also, misapplication (as opposed to misappropriation) of insurance proceeds, condemnation awards and/or rents following an event of default may not give rise to recourse.
| ||
(26) Recourse Obligations | El Dorado Tech Center
|
There is no related non-recourse carveout guarantor distinct from the related Mortgagor. | ||
(26) Recourse Obligations | Dollar General Winterset
Dollar General Bay City
Dollar General Rockford
|
With respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, voluntary transfers in violation of the related loan documents is not a full recourse carveout but is a loss, costs and damages carveout. In addition, the related loan documents do not provide recourse to the related guarantor for breaches of the environmental covenants contained in the related loan documents.
As regards recourse against the guarantor for waste, the related loan documents do not specifically reference “waste”, but provide for recourse against the guarantor for losses arising from physical damage to the related Mortgaged Property from the willful misconduct of the related Mortgagor or any affiliate of the related Mortgagor or, after the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, the removal or disposal of any portion of the related Mortgaged Property in violation of the related loan documents (other than in the ordinary course of business).
| ||
(27) Mortgage Releases | All Mortgage Loans transferred by LCF | If the loan-to-value ratio of the related Mortgaged Property following a condemnation exceeds 125%, the related Mortgagor may be able to avoid having to pay down the subject Mortgage Loan if it delivers an opinion of counsel to the effect that the failure to make such pay down will not cause the REMIC holding the subject Mortgage Loan to fail to qualify as such.
| ||
(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls | Dollar General Winterset
Dollar General Bay City
Dollar General Rockford
|
With respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related loan documents provide that the related Mortgagor is not required to deliver quarterly and annual operating or other financial statements so long as (i) at the applicable time, the related lease(s) then in effect provide for the same or a substantially similar allocation of responsibilities between the related Mortgagor and related tenant(s) as were in effect between the related Mortgagor and the related sole tenant at the origination date without material changes, or (ii) the related tenant(s) of the related Mortgaged Property is a so-called “triple-net” tenant and the related Mortgagor’s only related expense is debt service, provided that the related Mortgagor will be required under such circumstances to deliver a certified rent roll for the related Mortgaged Property at such time. | ||
(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | All Mortgage Loans transferred by LCF | Except with respect to Mortgage Loans where terrorism insurance is not required or where a tenant is permitted to self-insure, if any of the Policies (as defined in the related loan agreement) contain exclusions for loss, cost, damage or liability caused by “terrorism” or “terrorist acts” (“Acts of Terrorism”), the related Mortgagor must obtain and maintain terrorism coverage to cover such exclusions from an insurer |
D-2-8
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements specified in Representation and Warranty No. 16 (a “Qualified Insurer”) or, in the event that such terrorism coverage is not available from a Qualified Carrier, the related Mortgagor must obtain such terrorism coverage from the highest rated insurance company providing such terrorism coverage.
In addition, subject to the other exceptions to Representation and Warranty No. 29, even where terrorism insurance is required, the related Mortgagor may not be required to pay more for terrorism insurance coverage than a specified percentage (at least equal to 200%) of the amount of the insurance premium then currently payable for the property insurance policy required under the related loan documents (excluding such terrorism coverage and coverage for other catastrophe perils such as flood, windstorm and earthquake), and if the cost of such terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, then the related Mortgagor is only required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount.
| ||||
(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | Kohl’s Neenah (Loan No. 47) |
The related Mortgagor’s obligation to provide required insurance (including property (other than contingent property coverage), terrorism and liability coverage) is suspended if the related sole tenant elects to provide third party insurance or self-insure in accordance with its lease. The related sole tenant is permitted to self-insure under its lease if, among other things, such tenant maintains (i) an “investment grade” credit rating from two (2) rating agencies (defined as “the senior unsecured debt rating for such tenant or such tenant’s parent company being not less than ‘BBB-’ by S&P, ‘BBB-’ by Fitch or ‘Baa3’ by Moody’s” and (ii) a net worth of at least $100 million.
The related sole tenant’s lease permits the tenant to abate rent to the extent that the leased premises are unusable following casualty, and to terminate the lease if the casualty damage affects 50% or more of the leased premises and the time to restore, as estimated by tenant, is greater than 210 days. If the related sole tenant’s lease is in full force and effect, the provisions of such lease will control disbursement of any casualty proceeds.
As of origination, the related sole tenant is providing third-party insurance for lease-required coverages, including, among other things, property insurance and liability insurance, subject in each case to a $250,000 deductible. Third-party insurers providing lease-required coverages must have a minimum A.M. Best policyholder’s rating of at least B+/X, and the sole tenant’s lease does not specifically reference insurance against acts of terrorism. The related Mortgagor is, however, obligated to provide contingent property insurance and 12 months of business interruption coverage.
| ||
(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion | Dollar General Winterset
Dollar General Bay City
Dollar General Rockford
|
With respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Property is not required to be covered by terrorism insurance. Any terrorism insurance coverage currently maintained may be terminated at any time. |
D-2-9
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(30) Due on Sale or Encumbrance | All Mortgage Loans transferred by LCF | Any pledge of a direct or indirect equity interest in the related Mortgagor would be permitted if the transfer of such equity interest to the pledgee would be a permitted transfer under the terms of Representation and Warranty No. 30 or as contemplated by any other exception to Representation and Warranty No. 30 set forth herein.
In addition, with respect to clause (a)(v), mergers, acquisitions and other business combinations involving a publicly traded company may be permitted; and, for certain Mortgage Loans, transfers, sales and pledges of direct or indirect equity interests in the related Mortgagor may be permitted if such equity interests are limited partnership interests, non-managing member interests in a limited liability company or other passive equity interests.
| ||
(30) Due on Sale or Encumbrance | Dollar General Winterset
Dollar General Bay City
Dollar General Rockford
|
For each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related loan documents permit transfers without the lender’s consent by the related Mortgagor and by and to certain affiliates of Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP or Ladder Capital Corp.
In addition, with respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, corporate financing is permitted provided that such financing is secured by real estate collateral satisfying the requirements of the related loan documents in addition to the pledged interest in the related mortgage borrower. Transfers of the pledged equity interests by reason thereof are permitted.
| ||
(31) Single-Purpose Entity | The Village at La Orilla (Loan No. 20) |
The related Mortgagor is a recycled single-purpose entity that previously owned neighboring property (the “Other Property”) that is included in the scope of the related Phase I environmental site assessment, but was sold by the related Mortgagor prior to the origination of the subject Mortgage Loan. A losses carveout is included in the related loan documents for the Other Property and the Other Property is covered in the related environmental indemnity.
| ||
(39) Organization of Mortgagor | Firehouse Self Storage
East Sac Self Storage
|
With respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgagor is affiliated with the Mortgagor under the other subject Mortgage Loan. | ||
(39) Organization of Mortgagor | Dollar General Winterset
Dollar General Bay City
Dollar General Rockford
|
With respect to each of the subject Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgagor is affiliated with the Mortgagors under the other subject Mortgage Loans. | ||
(40) Environmental Conditions | GNL Industrial Portfolio (Loan No. 11) |
The GNL Industrial Portfolio – 11495 Deerfield Road Mortgaged Property is identified on multiple environmental regulatory databases. Such Mortgaged Property has been occupied by a commercial or light industrial facility since development in 1969. Historical releases have resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the related Mortgaged Property. These releases led to identified concentrations above regulatory action levels. A “no further action” letter and a “covenant not to sue” have been issued for the facility along with deed restrictions limiting future |
D-2-10
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
land use to industrial and commercial activities, as well as prohibiting groundwater use or extraction from the related Mortgaged Property except for the purposes of sampling or remedial activities. The related Mortgagor covenanted to comply with the foregoing. Based upon the current regulatory status of the identified releases, this condition is considered a controlled recognized environmental condition at the related Mortgaged Property. |
D-2-11
Société Générale
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Houston Distribution Center (Loan No. 4) | The single tenant at the Mortgaged Property has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property in the event that the Mortgagor receives a bona fide third-party offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property. The right of first refusal does not apply to foreclosure, deed-in-lieu thereof or the first sale subsequent to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu thereof. | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Residence Inn Irvine (Loan No. 10) | Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC, the property manager of the related Mortgaged Property, has a right of first offer to purchase the hotel located on such Mortgaged Property. A Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement was entered with Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC, which, together with the related management agreement, states that the right of first offer does not apply to a foreclosure, including judicial and non-judicial foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, but applies to subsequent transfers. | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Holiday Inn Express Trinity (Loan No. 41) | A neighboring landowner has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property if the Mortgagor receives a bona fide offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property. The right of first refusal does not apply in the event of foreclosure, deed-in-lieu thereof or the first transfer subsequent to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu thereof. The right of first refusal is subordinated to the Mortgage Loan. | ||
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan | AFIN Portfolio (Loan No. 1) | The guarantor is a defendant in a stockholder derivative action filed on January 13, 2017, related to the merger of the guarantor and an entity under common control with the guarantor. The plaintiffs are seeking, among other things, rescission of the merger and unspecified monetary damages. | ||
(16) Insurance | Houston Distribution Center (Loan No. 4) | The Mortgagor is permitted to rely on insurance provided by the single tenant, provided that such insurance meets the requirements of the Mortgage Loan documents. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | AFIN Portfolio (Loan No. 1) | The second largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property identified as Montecito Crossing is, among other things, a provider of veterinary services. Veterinary service is a legal non-conforming use that is not permitted at the Mortgaged Property under current zoning laws without a special use permit. In the event of a casualty affecting more than 50% of the replacement value of the Mortgaged Property, the non-conforming use may not be continued. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | BlueLinx Portfolio (Loan No. 12) | The Mortgaged Property identified as Bellingham is non-conforming with respect to the municipal zoning ordinance’s setback requirements.
The Mortgaged Property identified as Lawrenceville does not have a certificate of occupancy on file with the municipality, which is a violation of the municipal zoning ordinance. The Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor to obtain a certificate of occupancy within 30 days of origination and provide for recourse for losses incurred in connection with the absence of a certificate of occupancy.
| ||
(26) Recourse Obligations | BlueLinx Portfolio (Loan No. 12) | The Mortgage Loan documents do not provide recourse for waste that arises due to (a) the failure of the applicable Mortgaged Property to generate sufficient income to maintain such Mortgaged Property and (b) insufficient funds in the reserve accounts created for the express purpose of |
D-2-12
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
paying maintenance costs related to such Mortgaged Property. | ||||
(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls | BlueLinx Portfolio (Loan No. 12) | The Mortgagor is only required to provide audited financial statements during the continuance of an event of default under the Mortgage Loan documents. | ||
(39) Organization of Mortgagor | AFIN Portfolio (Loan No. 1) | The Mortgagor is affiliated with the Mortgagor under the Mortgage Loan known as AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio, which is being sold to the Trust by Barclays Bank PLC. |
D-2-13
Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P.
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | CrossPoint (Loan No. 3) | The largest tenant, Kronos, has a right of first offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property so long as (i) Kronos (or any permitted transferee) is still a tenant at the Mortgaged Property, (ii) Kronos has not (a) sublet more than 25% of its premises or (b) assigned its lease to a party with a lower net worth than Kronos and (iii) there is no material default under the lease. The right of first offer does not apply to a sale pursuant to an exercise of a power of sale, foreclosure, delivery of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or any subsequent sale of the Mortgaged Property. | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Quakertown Shopping Center (Loan No. 30) | An equity holder, Peaceable Preferred Investor XIV(PA) LLC, has a right of first refusal with respect to the Mortgaged Property in the event the Mortgagor receives a written offer for the purchase of the Mortgaged Property that the Mortgagor intends to accept. Such right is subject and subordinate to the Mortgage and the other Mortgage Loan documents and will not apply in connection with a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure. | ||
(25) Licenses and Permits | 4851 South Alameda Street (Loan No. 17) | Nationwide Pallets, a tenant at the Mortgage Property, does not have a certificate of occupancy or conditional use permit. | ||
(26) Recourse Obligations | CrossPoint (Loan No. 3) | There is no recourse to a separate guarantor for (1) the Mortgagor’s misappropriation of security deposits or, alternatively, the failure of any security deposits to be delivered to lender upon foreclosure or action in lieu thereof (except to the extent applied in accordance with leases prior to a Mortgage Loan event of default) or (2) the Mortgagor’s commission of intentional material physical waste at the Mortgaged Property. Additionally, the Mortgage Loan documents do not provide for recourse to the related guarantor for breaches of the environmental covenants. The Mortgagor obtained environmental insurance in lieu of an environmental indemnitor with respect to the Mortgaged Property. | ||
(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls | Tryad Industrial & Business Center (Loan No. 2) | The original principal balance of the Whole Loan exceeds $50,000,000, but the Whole Loan documents to not require the Mortgagor to provide financial statements that have been audited by an independent certified public accountant unless requested by lender during the continuance of an event of default. | ||
(34) Ground Leases | Tryad Industrial & Business Center (Loan No. 2) | In connection with a payment in lieu of taxes agreement with the county Industrial Development Agency (“IDA”), the Mortgagor leased the Mortgaged Property to IDA and IDA subleased the Mortgaged Property back to the Mortgagor. The Mortgagor owns the fee interest in the Mortgaged Property and the Mortgage contains a joinder executed by the IDA. The lender has the right to terminate the ground lease and related sub-lease in connection with a foreclosure proceeding against the Mortgagor. |
D-2-14
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Beach Boulevard Medical Pavilion (Loan No. 19) | The Mortgage Loan is subject to a first priority “Pace Loan” in the original principal amount of $2,500,000, which matures in 2037, unless prepaid on an earlier date. The Mortgagor is obligated to make payments under the Pace Loan as a portion of the real estate taxes assessed against the Mortgaged Property. | ||
(24) Local Law Compliance | Clarksville Shops (Loan No. 62) | The use of the Mortgaged Property as a staffing service, medical clinic or insurance office (the current uses) are pre-existing legally non-conforming uses, as the current uses are not permitted uses under current zoning laws without a use variance (which was not obtained). In the event of a casualty that damages 50% or more of the market value of the structures on the Mortgaged Property, the Mortgaged Property may only be restored in accordance with the current zoning laws. Additionally, the Mortgage Loan documents require the Mortgagor to provide evidence (which may be in the form of a variance or other evidence) that the legally non-conforming uses can continue prior to the release of casualty proceeds. | ||
(34) Ground Lease | 1990 NASA Boulevard (Loan No. 18) | (a) The Mortgaged Property is subject to the following restrictions under a lease between the City of Melbourne Airport Authority (“Ground Lessor”) and Northrop Grumman Corporation, a tenant in the Melbourne Business Park:
Without the prior consent of Northrup Grumman, which consent may be withheld for any reason, (i) no buildings having a height greater than forty feet will be permitted in the portion of the Mortgaged Property lying in that certain sector which the Ground Lessor maintains for testing of high peak power pulse emitters, (ii) no portion of the Mortgaged Property may be sold, rented or leased to any company engaged in the development, manufacture, and/or testing of any electromagnetic emitters, (iii) no new structures may be constructed within 100 feet of the security fence surrounding the Northrup Grumman facility, (iv) no new structures may be constructed within a circle radius of 1,500 feet with center coordinates located at the center of the Radome located on the roof of the Northrup Grumman facility, (v) new buildings on the Mortgaged Property may not exceed forty-eight feet in height, and (vi) the Mortgagor may not emit or radiate any radiofrequency energy from buildings constructed on the Mortgaged Property north of a certain designated line on the Mortgaged Property, except as part of its normal business operations using general business equipment. |
D-2-15
CIBC Inc.
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(5) Lien; Valid Assignment; (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Walgreens -Harlingen, TX (Loan No. 61)
Walgreens -Dallas, GA (Loan No. 63)
Walgreens -Guthrie, OK (Loan No. 64)
|
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation, the sole tenant at the related Mortgaged Property, has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property upon the terms and conditions agreed to by the related Mortgagor with any third party. Pursuant to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement obtained in connection with the related Mortgage Loan, the tenant agreed that the lease is subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage Loan, and its right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property shall not apply to any foreclosure (judicial or non-judicial) of the related Mortgage (or to a deed-in-lieu thereof).
| ||
(16) Insurance | Plaza Point Shopping Center (Loan No. 59) | With respect to insurance for windstorm and/or windstorm-related perils, the related Mortgage Loan documents permit a deductible for such coverages in an amount equal to one percent (1%) of the insured value of the Mortgaged Property (with a minimum deductible of $25,000). The amount of such deductible may be considered higher than customary.
| ||
(16) Insurance | Walgreens -Harlingen, TX (Loan No. 61)
Walgreens -Dallas, GA (Loan No. 63)
Walgreens -Guthrie, OK (Loan No. 64)
|
The related Mortgage Loan documents provide that the tenant under the Walgreens lease may self-insure the property coverage required under the Loan Agreement so long as, among other things, (i) the Walgreens lease remains in full force and effect, (ii) Walgreens remains current in regard to payment of rent under its lease and no other default exists under the Walgreens lease beyond 45 days after notice, (iii) such tenant (or its parent) maintains a rating of not less than the lowest investment-grade rating of each applicable rating agency as more fully set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents, (iv) Walgreens remains open and operating at the Mortgaged Property and is obligated to provide such insurance pursuant to the Walgreens Lease, or if Walgreens is self-insuring pursuant to the Walgreens lease, Walgreens delivers a letter of self-insurance in form and substance acceptable to lender which includes confirmation that, notwithstanding that Walgreens is not open to the public, that Walgreens will continue to self-insure with respect to the insurance required to be maintained by Walgreens, (v) Walgreens remains obligated to rebuild and restore the Walgreens Premises at its sole cost and expense or is not entitled to abate rent or terminate the Walgreens Lease as a result of a casualty, and (vi) there is no bankruptcy or insolvency action by Walgreens as more fully set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. | ||
(26) Recourse Obligations | Fortuna Center Plaza (Loan No. 25) | With respect to liability for breaches of the environmental covenants in the related Mortgage Loan documents, the recourse obligations for environmental indemnification shall terminate not earlier than twenty-four (24) months after payment in full of such Mortgage Loan if certain conditions more fully set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents are satisfied, including, without limitation, that the holder of the Mortgage Loan shall have received an environmental inspection report for the related Mortgaged Property meeting criteria set forth in such Mortgage Loan documents. |
D-2-16
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
With respect to liability for material physical waste, Borrower shall not be liable to the extent that the Property has failed to generate sufficient revenues to avoid such waste. | ||||
(26) Recourse Obligations | WoodSpring Suites Baton Rouge Portfolio (Loan No. 44) | With respect to liability for material physical waste, Borrower shall not be liable to the extent that the Property has failed to generate sufficient revenues to avoid such waste.
| ||
(39) Organization of Mortgagor | Walgreens -Harlingen, TX (Loan No. 61)
Walgreens -Dallas, GA (Loan No. 63)
Walgreens -Guthrie, OK (Loan No. 64) |
The Mortgagors under each of these Mortgage Loans are affiliated entities. |
D-2-17
Barclays Bank PLC
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance | Kohl’s – Jensen Beach (Loan No. 31) | The sole tenant at the Mortgaged Property has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property or any portion thereof at any time during its respective lease term. The tenant has agreed that such right of first refusal will not apply to the acquisition by the lender of title to the Mortgaged Property by foreclosure, deed in lieu thereof or otherwise, or any subsequent sale by the lender or its designee. | ||
(16) Insurance | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio (Loan No. 9) | The Mortgage Loan documents permit insurance coverage through multiple insurance companies provided that: (i) if there is only one insurance company issuing the policies, such insurance company has a rating of “A VIII” or better by A.M. Best Company, Inc. or “A” or better by S&P, (ii) if there are four or fewer insurance companies issuing the policies, at least 75% of the insurance coverage is provided by insurance companies having a rating of “A” or better by S&P, with the remaining 25% of such insurance coverage provided by insurance companies having a rating of “BBB” or better by S&P, or (iii) if there are five or more insurance companies issuing the policies, at least 60% of the insurance coverage is provided by insurance companies having a rating of “A” or better by S&P, with the remaining 40% of such insurance coverage provided by insurance companies having a rating of “BBB” or better by S&P.
The Mortgage Loan documents permit a property insurance deductible of up to $100,000.
The Mortgagor may rely on the sole tenant to provide (i) property insurance, (ii) loss of rents and/or business interruption insurance, (iii) owner’s contingent or protective liability insurance and builder’s risk insurance (in each case, only in the event structural construction, repairs or alterations are being made with respect to the improvements at the Mortgaged Property), (iv) boiler and machinery insurance, (v) flood insurance, (vi) earthquake insurance, and (vii) any other insurance as the lender may reasonably request (if applicable) (such policies described in clauses (i) through (viii) above, collectively, the “Excepted Insurance Policies”); provided, however that certain requirements specified in the Mortgage Loan documents are satisfied, including the requirement that the tenant maintain coverage on the Excepted Insurance Policies in amounts and on terms that satisfy the requirements of the Mortgage Loan documents or, if such coverage on the Excepted Insurance Policies does not satisfy the requirements of the Mortgage Loan documents, such coverage is otherwise acceptable to the lender in its sole discretion. If such conditions are not met, the Mortgagor must obtain, either as primary insurance coverage or as excess and contingent insurance coverage, any and all insurance as required to bring the coverage on the Excepted Insurance Policies into full compliance with the Mortgage Loan documents.
The Mortgage Loan documents permit the Mortgagor to maintain (or cause to be maintained) insurance policies which (i) have coverages, deductibles and/or other related provisions other than those specified in the Mortgage Loan documents and/or (ii) are provided by insurance companies |
D-2-18
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
not meeting the credit ratings requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents; provided that, prior to obtaining such non-conforming policy, the Mortgagor has received (A) the lender’s prior written consent thereto not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned and, (B) a rating agency confirmation with respect to any such non-conforming policy. The lender may deny its consent to any non-confirming policy regardless of whether or not the lender has consented to the same on any prior occasion.
The threshold at or above which the lender has the right to hold and disburse insurance proceeds in respect of a casualty loss with respect to each individual Mortgaged Property is an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the threshold set forth in the applicable lease, and (ii) 5% of the outstanding principal amount of the allocated loan amount attributable to such individual Mortgaged Property.
| ||||
(16) Insurance | Braemar Office Park (Loan No. 16) | The threshold at or above which the lender has the right to hold and disburse insurance proceeds in respect of a casualty loss is 5% of the original principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, rather than 5% of the then outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan.
The Mortgage Loan documents permit the Mortgagor to maintain (or cause to be maintained) insurance policies which (i) have coverages, deductibles and/or other related provisions other than those specified in the Mortgage Loan documents and/or (ii) are provided by insurance companies not meeting the credit ratings requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents; provided that, prior to obtaining such non-conforming policy, the Mortgagor has received (A) the lender’s prior written consent thereto and, (B) a rating agency confirmation with respect to any such non-conforming policy. The lender may deny its consent to any non-confirming policy regardless of whether or not the lender has consented to the same on any prior occasion.
| ||
(16) Insurance | Kohl’s - Jensen Beach (Loan No. 31) | The Mortgage Loan documents require that all insurance policies be provided by an insurance company having a claims paying ability/financial strength rating of “A-” or better by S&P or “A X” or better by A.M. Best; provided, however that the Mortgagor is permitted to maintain loss of rents and/or business interruption insurance coverage with Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company (“Tower Hill”), which has a rating of “A-VII” by A.M. Best, in its current participation amount and position within the syndicate, provided that (x) the A.M. Best rating of Tower Hill is not withdrawn or downgraded and (y) at renewal of the current policy term, the Mortgagor will replace Tower Hill with an insurance company meeting the rating requirements above.
The Mortgagor may rely on the sole tenant to maintain property insurance, builder’s risk insurance (in the event structural construction, repairs or alterations are being made with respect to the improvements at the Mortgaged Property), equipment breakdown insurance, flood insurance and earthquake insurance provided that certain requirements specified in the Mortgage Loan documents are met, including the requirement that either of the following conditions are met: (A) the sole tenant maintains the insurance policies meeting the requirements set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents (except that the deductible under such policies maintained by the sole tenant may be up to |
D-2-19
Rep.
No. on |
Mortgage
Loan and |
Description of the Exception | ||
$250,000), or (B) the tenant remains fully liable for the obligations and liabilities under the lease and maintains an S&P rating of at least “BBB-” and the tenant maintains, either through a program of self-insurance or otherwise, the insurance required to be maintained by it under the lease. The tenant may elect to self-insure only if such tenant maintains a net worth of at least $100,000,000. If such conditions are not met, the Mortgagor must obtain, either as primary insurance coverage or excess and contingent insurance coverage, any and all insurance required to bring the insurance coverage on the Mortgaged Property into full compliance with the Mortgage Loan documents and to provide coverage that will pay proceeds in an amount sufficient to restore the Mortgaged Property. | ||||
(16) Insurance | Appleton Self Storage (Loan No. 55) | The threshold at or above which the lender has the right to hold and disburse insurance proceeds in respect of a casualty loss is $230,000, which is equal to 5% of the original principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, rather than 5% of the then outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan. | ||
(31) Single-Purpose Entity | Braemar Office Park (Loan No. 16)
Tarzana Village (Loan No. 32)
The Avery Georgetown (Loan No. 54)
Appleton Self Storage (Loan No. 55)
|
The Mortgagor is a recycled single purpose entity that has never owned other property. There are no exceptions to the standard “backward” representations. | ||
(39) Organization of Mortgagor | AFIN Industrial and Retail Net-Leased Portfolio (Loan No. 9) | The Mortgagor is affiliated with the Mortgagor under the Mortgage Loan known as AFIN Portfolio, which Mortgage Loan is being sold to the Trust by UBS AG and Société Générale. |
D-2-20
ANNEX E
CLASS A-SB PLANNED PRINCIPAL BALANCE SCHEDULE
Distribution Date |
Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance |
3/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
4/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
5/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
6/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
7/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
8/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
9/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
10/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
11/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
12/15/2018 | $35,465,000.00 |
1/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
2/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
3/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
4/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
5/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
6/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
7/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
8/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
9/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
10/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
11/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
12/15/2019 | $35,465,000.00 |
1/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
2/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
3/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
4/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
5/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
6/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
7/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
8/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
9/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
10/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
11/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
12/15/2020 | $35,465,000.00 |
1/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
2/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
3/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
4/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
5/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
6/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
7/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
8/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
9/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
10/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
11/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
12/15/2021 | $35,465,000.00 |
1/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
2/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
3/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
4/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
5/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
6/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
7/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
8/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
9/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
10/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
11/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
12/15/2022 | $35,465,000.00 |
Distribution Date |
Class A-SB Planned Principal Balance |
1/15/2023 | $35,465,000.00 |
2/15/2023 | $35,464,260.62 |
3/15/2023 | $34,705,052.81 |
4/15/2023 | $34,109,552.48 |
5/15/2023 | $33,456,092.02 |
6/15/2023 | $32,855,329.95 |
7/15/2023 | $32,196,755.95 |
8/15/2023 | $31,590,688.26 |
9/15/2023 | $30,982,067.45 |
10/15/2023 | $30,315,856.06 |
11/15/2023 | $29,701,864.10 |
12/15/2023 | $29,030,432.84 |
1/15/2024 | $28,411,024.94 |
2/15/2024 | $27,789,007.51 |
3/15/2024 | $27,055,184.12 |
4/15/2024 | $26,427,453.17 |
5/15/2024 | $25,742,669.87 |
6/15/2024 | $25,109,408.39 |
7/15/2024 | $24,419,250.33 |
8/15/2024 | $23,780,412.20 |
9/15/2024 | $23,138,882.35 |
10/15/2024 | $22,440,688.80 |
11/15/2024 | $21,793,513.34 |
12/15/2024 | $21,089,833.19 |
1/15/2025 | $20,436,965.03 |
2/15/2025 | $19,781,345.81 |
3/15/2025 | $18,962,451.34 |
4/15/2025 | $18,300,616.89 |
5/15/2025 | $17,582,690.60 |
6/15/2025 | $16,915,041.17 |
7/15/2025 | $16,191,463.67 |
8/15/2025 | $15,517,950.75 |
9/15/2025 | $14,841,599.43 |
10/15/2025 | $14,109,565.12 |
11/15/2025 | $13,427,277.72 |
12/15/2025 | $12,689,474.51 |
1/15/2026 | $12,001,201.50 |
2/15/2026 | $11,310,027.64 |
3/15/2026 | $10,458,883.44 |
4/15/2026 | $9,761,207.50 |
5/15/2026 | $9,008,449.15 |
6/15/2026 | $8,304,659.21 |
7/15/2026 | $7,545,959.06 |
8/15/2026 | $6,836,004.12 |
9/15/2026 | $6,123,056.59 |
10/15/2026 | $5,355,456.75 |
11/15/2026 | $4,636,267.81 |
12/15/2026 | $3,862,602.33 |
1/15/2027 | $3,137,119.90 |
2/15/2027 | $2,408,579.17 |
3/15/2027 | $1,523,541.44 |
4/15/2027 | $788,197.09 |
5/15/2027 and thereafter | $0.00 |
E-1
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
No dealer, salesman or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the securities offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Certificates | 3 |
Important Notice Regarding the Offered Certificates | 16 |
Important Notice About Information Presented in this Prospectus | 17 |
Summary of Terms | 24 |
Risk Factors | 63 |
Description of the Mortgage Pool | 158 |
Transaction Parties | 261 |
Credit Risk Retention | 340 |
Description of the Certificates | 349 |
Description of the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements | 391 |
Pooling and Servicing Agreement | 403 |
Certain Legal Aspects of Mortgage Loans | 525 |
Certain Affiliations, Relationships and Related Transactions Involving Transaction Parties | 545 |
Pending Legal Proceedings Involving Transaction Parties | 548 |
Use of Proceeds | 548 |
Yield and Maturity Considerations | 548 |
Material Federal Income Tax Considerations | 562 |
Certain State and Local Tax Considerations | 577 |
Method of Distribution (Underwriter) | 577 |
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference | 581 |
Where You Can Find More Information | 581 |
Financial Information | 582 |
Certain ERISA Considerations | 582 |
Legal Investment | 587 |
Legal Matters | 588 |
Ratings | 588 |
Index of Defined Terms | 591 |
Dealers will be required to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters of these certificates and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions. In addition, all dealers selling these certificates will deliver a prospectus until the date that is ninety days from the date of this prospectus.
$917,134,000
(Approximate)
UBS
Commercial Mortgage
Securitization Corp.
Depositor
UBS
Commercial Mortgage
Trust 2018-C8
Issuing Entity
Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates,
Series 2018-C8
Class A-1 | $ | 23,231,000 | ||
Class A-2 | $ | 68,276,000 | ||
Class A-SB | $ | 35,465,000 | ||
Class A-3 | $ | 284,000,000 | ||
Class A-4 | $ | 320,645,000 | ||
Class X-A | $ | 731,617,000 | ||
Class X-B | $ | 185,517,000 | ||
Class A-S | $ | 84,920,000 | ||
Class B | $ | 54,871,000 | ||
Class C | $ | 45,726,000 |
PROSPECTUS
UBS
Securities LLC
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Société Générale
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Barclays
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner
CIBC World Markets
Co-Manager
Drexel Hamilton
Co-Manager
Academy Securities
Co-Manager
February 12, 2018
2=(T6NO85RNCNJ,+/L;9EX&7;W#)IY5N5J<9SK5>S%Q3EJNQ,[0
M_3;MJF\UM'GZT[O(_P!QC(EU4T-K>S@XV",0V3>RG[+)C'^4H6/9*E76$GH1
M P*#^ 0-G'_>KIKER)_;\3DQ*><_-A2US:+GU]FKT5>+TXG*^A^KXSQK 7C7[VV7+73.;DJQCY?G6Y2G+,8RYW51E]J;&:AY./"XK4$TJM>4E&+]EK7FUL=?*3VCW9KKXQ
M+]TRW5$T;1G7!I#UKL7%-]W5O5[+4VTU]W3,[L&P[1ILG9H9[=4-H5&19%C_
M &FLL+Q$Y6X)H\F N];YE=.[3N&_X?56).]O&?*4\5O'G>=ZRL>,;<+4XPDH
M>5-3YJN'*_:J]&>?]-XO4F\[7TUF='Y<+6QX,%;S(^?"UY-_SY3NSNP'@]/[ODY%K$V
M5;!9M*[=PI9UN%YJ#E%P57;G