UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 333-177328
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California | 95-4240219 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 | 92618-2215 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(909) 594-9500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one).
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The registrant is a voluntary filer and is not subject to the filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Although not subject to these filing requirements, the registrant has filed all Exchange Act reports for the preceding 12 months.
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||||
ITEM 1. |
||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 |
1 | |||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
ITEM 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
30 | ||||||
ITEM 3. |
46 | |||||||
ITEM 4. |
46 | |||||||
ITEM 1. |
48 | |||||||
ITEM 1A. |
48 | |||||||
ITEM 5. |
48 | |||||||
ITEM 6. |
49 | |||||||
50 |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
(A California Limited Partnership)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 157,997 | $ | 279,756 | ||||
Restricted cash |
2,334 | 13,031 | ||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
146,018 | 141,289 | ||||||
Receivables from related parties, net |
34,484 | 34,028 | ||||||
Inventory |
994,103 | 837,653 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
39,400 | 28,653 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
37,221 | 39,127 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,411,557 | $ | 1,373,537 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 759,740 | $ | 758,209 | ||||
Payables to related parties |
4,159 | 125 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
54,915 | 62,738 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
246,890 | 233,218 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
1,065,704 | 1,054,290 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
SHLP equity: |
||||||||
Owners equity |
340,693 | 314,321 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
4,754 | 4,517 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total SHLP equity |
345,447 | 318,838 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests |
406 | 409 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
345,853 | 319,247 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,411,557 | $ | 1,373,537 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
1
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
(A California Limited Partnership)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 217,310 | $ | 132,468 | $ | 352,270 | $ | 238,071 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
(168,884 | ) | (107,978 | ) | (272,308 | ) | (193,013 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross margin |
48,426 | 24,490 | 79,962 | 45,058 | ||||||||||||
Selling expenses |
(12,848 | ) | (10,199 | ) | (23,002 | ) | (19,551 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(14,078 | ) | (11,573 | ) | (26,035 | ) | (19,824 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
478 | 317 | (154 | ) | 384 | |||||||||||
Loss on reinsurance transaction |
(807 | ) | (8,163 | ) | (159 | ) | (7,367 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,397 | ) | (5,909 | ) | (4,830 | ) | (12,197 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
237 | (235 | ) | 1,007 | 1,275 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
20,011 | (11,272 | ) | 26,789 | (12,222 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(479 | ) | (848 | ) | (420 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
19,532 | (12,120 | ) | 26,369 | (12,318 | ) | ||||||||||
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests |
2 | 19 | 3 | (194 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | 19,534 | $ | (12,101 | ) | $ | 26,372 | $ | (12,512 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
2
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
(A California Limited Partnership)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 19,532 | $ | (12,120 | ) | $ | 26,369 | $ | (12,318 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized investment holding gains (losses) during the year |
175 | (290 | ) | 425 | 1,953 | |||||||||||
Less: Reclassification adjustments for investment (gains) losses included in other income (expense) |
0 | 23 | (37 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss), before tax |
19,707 | (12,387 | ) | 26,757 | (10,365 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense relating to other comprehensive income / (loss) |
(68 | ) | (374 | ) | (151 | ) | (1,151 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
19,639 | (12,761 | ) | 26,606 | (11,516 | ) | ||||||||||
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests |
2 | 19 | 3 | (194 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | 19,641 | $ | (12,742 | ) | $ | 26,609 | $ | (11,710 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
3
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
(A California Limited Partnership)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(In thousands)
Shea Homes Limited Partnership | Non- controlling Interests |
Total Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limited Partner | General Partner |
Total Owners Equity |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total SHLP Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Preferred Series B |
Preferred Series D |
Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
$ | 1 | $ | 173,555 | $ | 120,955 | $ | 0 | $ | 294,511 | $ | 6,392 | $ | 300,903 | $ | 27,100 | $ | 328,003 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
0 | (12,512 | ) | 0 | 0 | (12,512 | ) | 0 | (12,512 | ) | 194 | (12,318 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on investments, net |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 802 | 802 | 0 | 802 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
(11,710 | ) | 194 | (11,516 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of Companys interest in consolidated joint venture (see Note 12) |
0 | (11,580 | ) | 0 | 0 | (11,580 | ) | 0 | (11,580 | ) | (28,239 | ) | (39,819 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions from non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,746 | 1,746 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (345 | ) | (345 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
$ | 1 | $ | 149,463 | $ | 120,955 | $ | 0 | $ | 270,419 | $ | 7,194 | $ | 277,613 | $ | 456 | $ | 278,069 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2012 |
$ | 1,863 | $ | 173,555 | $ | 138,413 | $ | 490 | $ | 314,321 | $ | 4,517 | $ | 318,838 | $ | 409 | $ | 319,247 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
0 | 0 | 26,372 | 0 | 26,372 | 0 | 26,372 | (3 | ) | 26,369 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on investments, net |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 237 | 237 | 0 | 237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
26,609 | (3 | ) | 26,606 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2013 (unaudited) |
$ | 1,863 | $ | 173,555 | $ | 164,785 | $ | 490 | $ | 340,693 | $ | 4,754 | $ | 345,447 | $ | 406 | $ | 345,853 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
(A California Limited Partnership)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 26,369 | $ | (12,318 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Equity in (income) loss from joint ventures |
154 | (384 | ) | |||||
Loss on reinsurance transaction |
159 | 7,367 | ||||||
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale investments |
(10 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
4,564 | 3,321 | ||||||
Net interest capitalized on investment in joint ventures |
(763 | ) | (378 | ) | ||||
Distributions of earnings from joint ventures |
6,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
10,697 | (141 | ) | |||||
Receivables and other assets |
(6,524 | ) | (4,846 | ) | ||||
Inventory |
(158,601 | ) | (28,542 | ) | ||||
Payables and other liabilities |
9,789 | 1,239 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
(108,166 | ) | (33,704 | ) | ||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments |
3,078 | 5,212 | ||||||
Net collections (advances) on promissory notes from related parties |
431 | 1,843 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
(16,350 | ) | (1,183 | ) | ||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
0 | 223 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(12,841 | ) | 6,095 | |||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Principal payments to financial institutions and others |
(752 | ) | (1,053 | ) | ||||
Contributions from non-controlling interests |
0 | 1,746 | ||||||
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
0 | (345 | ) | |||||
Other financing activities |
0 | (168 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) by financing activities |
(752 | ) | 180 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(121,759 | ) | (27,429 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
279,756 | 268,366 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 157,997 | $ | 240,937 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
(A California Limited Partnership)
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2013
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Shea Homes Limited Partnership (SHLP) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Shea Homes, Inc. (SHI) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company consolidates all joint ventures in which it has a controlling interest or other ventures in which it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE). Material intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements do not include all information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2012. Adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring accruals, loss reserves and deferred tax asset valuation allowance adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation, are included.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms we, us, our and the Company refer to SHLP, its subsidiaries and its consolidated joint ventures.
Organization
SHLP, a California limited partnership, was formed January 4, 1989, pursuant to an agreement of partnership (the Agreement), as most recently amended August 6, 2013, by and between J.F. Shea, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, as general partner, and the Companys limited partners who are comprised of entities and trusts, including J.F. Shea Co., Inc. (JFSCI), that are under the common control of Shea family members (collectively, the Partners). J.F. Shea, LP is 96% owned by JFSCI.
Nature of Operations
Our principal business purpose is homebuilding, which includes acquiring and developing land and constructing and selling new residential homes thereon. To a lesser degree, we develop lots and sell them to other homebuilders. Our principal markets are California, Arizona, Colorado, Washington, Nevada and Florida.
We own a captive insurance company, Partners Insurance Company, Inc. (PIC), which provided warranty, general liability, workers compensation and completed operations insurance for related companies and third-party subcontractors. Effective for the policy years commencing in 2007, PIC ceased issuing policies for these coverages (see Note 11).
Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations. We typically experience the highest home sales order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes three to eight months to construct a home, we close more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home sales orders convert to home closings. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows are historically highest from April to October, and the majority of cash receipts from home closings occur during the second half of the year. Therefore, operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications were made in the 2012 condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to classifications in 2013. As of December 31, 2012, investments of $12.1 million and property and equipment of $2.2 million were reclassified to other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a $7.4 million
6
loss on reinsurance was reclassified from other income (expense), net to gain (loss) on reinsurance transaction in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), with corresponding changes made to operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Inventory
Inventory is stated at cost, unless the carrying amount is determined not to be recoverable, in which case inventory is adjusted to fair value or fair value less cost to sell. Quarterly, we review our real estate assets at each community for indicators of impairment. Real estate assets include projects actively selling, under development, held for future development or held for sale. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in local housing market values and prices of comparable homes, significant decreases in gross margins and sales absorption rates, costs in excess of budget, and actual or projected cash flow losses.
If there are indications of impairment, we analyze the budgets and cash flows of our real estate assets and compare the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows of the community to the assets carrying value. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the assets carrying value, no impairment adjustment is required. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the assets carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and adjusted to fair value. For land held for sale, if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the assets carrying value, no impairment adjustment in required. These impairment evaluations require use of estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if estimated future undiscounted cash flows will be sufficient to recover the assets carrying value.
When estimating undiscounted cash flows of a community, various assumptions are made, including: (i) the number of homes available and the expected prices and incentives offered by us or builders in other communities, and future price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred, including, but not limited to, land and land development, home construction, interest, indirect construction and overhead, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property.
Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales rates has a direct impact on the estimated price of a home, the level of time sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and interest), and selling and marketing costs (such as model maintenance and advertising). Depending on the underlying objective of the community, assumptions could have a significant impact on the projected cash flows. For example, if our objective is to preserve operating margins, our cash flows will be different than if the objective is to increase sales. These objectives may vary significantly by community over time.
If assets are considered impaired, the impairment charge is the amount the assets carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets or other valuation techniques. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development, construction and delivery timelines; market risk of price erosion; uncertainty of development or construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities. The discount rate used in determining each assets fair value depends on the communitys projected life and development stage.
Completed Operations Claim Costs
We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance which includes coverage for completed operations losses and damages. Most subcontractors carry this insurance through our rolling wrap-up insurance program, where our risks and risks of participating subcontractors are insured through a common set of master policies.
Completed operations claims reserves primarily represent claims for property damage to completed homes and projects outside of our one-to-two year warranty period. Specific terms and conditions of completed operations warranties vary depending on the market in which homes are closed and can range up to 12 years from the closing of a home.
We record expenses and liabilities for estimated costs of potential completed operations claims based upon aggregated loss experience, which includes an estimate of completed operations claims incurred but not reported and is actuarially estimated using individual case-basis valuations and statistical analysis. These estimates make up our entire reserve and are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in completed operations claims related to our markets and products built, changes in claims reporting and settlement patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, insurance regulations and legal precedent. Because state regulations vary, completed operations claims are reported and resolved over an extended period, sometimes exceeding 12 years. As a result, actual costs may differ significantly from estimates.
7
The actuarial analyses that determine these incurred but not reported claims consider various factors, including frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of these claims and reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses. Due to inherent uncertainties related to these factors, periodic changes to such factors based on updated relevant information could result in actual costs differing significantly from estimates.
In accordance with our underlying completed operations insurance policies, these completed operations claims costs are recoverable from our subcontractors or insurance carriers. Completed operations claims through July 31, 2009 are insured or reinsured with third-party insurance carriers and completed operations claims commencing August 1, 2009 are insured with third-party and affiliate insurance carriers.
Revenues
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360, revenues from housing and other real estate sales are recognized when the respective units close. Housing and other real estate sales close when all conditions of escrow are met, including delivery of the home or other real estate asset, title passage, appropriate consideration is received or collection of associated receivables, if any, is reasonably assured and when we have no other continuing involvement in the asset. Sales incentives are a reduction of revenues when the respective unit closes.
Income Taxes
SHLP is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. As a limited partnership, SHLP is subject to certain minimal state taxes and fees; however, taxes on income realized by SHLP are generally the obligation of the Partners and their owners.
SHI and PIC are C corporations. Federal and state income taxes are provided for these entities in accordance with ASC 740. The provision for, or benefit from, income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect the year in which differences are expected to reverse.
Deferred tax assets are evaluated to determine whether a valuation allowance should be established based on our determination of whether it is more likely than not some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends primarily on generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Judgment is required in determining future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns. Differences between anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. For public entities, the amendments in ASU 2013-02 are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 effective January 1, 2013, which concerned disclosure requirements only and did not impact our consolidated financial statements.
3. Restricted Cash
At December 31, 2012, restricted cash included cash used as collateral for potential obligations paid by the Companys bank, customer deposits temporarily restricted in accordance with regulatory requirements, and cash used in lieu of bonds. In January 2013, $10.0 million of restricted cash used as collateral for potential obligations paid by the Companys bank was released to the Company. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, restricted cash was $2.3 million and $13.0 million, respectively.
8
4. Fair Value Disclosures
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as required by ASC 825, the following presents net book values and estimated fair values of notes payable.
June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
Net Book Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
Net Book Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
$750,000 8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 |
$ | 750,000 | $ | 821,250 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 828,750 | ||||||||
Secured promissory notes |
$ | 9,740 | $ | 9,740 | $ | 8,209 | $ | 8,209 |
The $750.0 million 8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 (the Secured Notes) are level 2 financial instruments in which fair value was based on quoted market prices in an inactive market at the end of the period.
Other financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and other liabilities and secured promissory notes. Book values of these financial instruments approximate fair value due to their relatively short-term nature. In addition, included in other assets are available-for-sale marketable securities, which are recorded at fair value.
5. Accounts and Other Receivables, net
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accounts and other receivables, net were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Insurance receivables |
$ | 131,248 | $ | 131,519 | ||||
Escrow receivables |
5,442 | 576 | ||||||
Notes receivables |
3,181 | 3,662 | ||||||
Development receivables |
3,095 | 3,325 | ||||||
Other receivables |
4,973 | 4,147 | ||||||
Reserve |
(1,921 | ) | (1,940 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total accounts and other receivables, net |
$ | 146,018 | $ | 141,289 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Insurance receivables are from insurance carriers for reimbursable claims pertaining to resultant damage from construction defects on closed homes (see Note 11). Closed homes for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2009 are insured or reinsured with third-party insurance carriers, and closed homes for policy years commencing August 1, 2009 are insured with third-party and affiliate insurance carriers. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, insurance receivables from affiliate insurance carriers were $34.4 million and $30.2 million, respectively.
We reserve for uncollectible receivables that are specifically identified.
9
6. Inventory
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, inventory was as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Model homes |
$ | 71,572 | $ | 69,210 | ||||
Completed homes for sale |
21,496 | 14,015 | ||||||
Homes under construction |
263,912 | 189,929 | ||||||
Lots available for construction |
284,196 | 249,463 | ||||||
Land under development |
189,261 | 175,922 | ||||||
Land held for future development |
79,656 | 60,466 | ||||||
Land held for sale, including water system connection rights |
73,024 | 71,381 | ||||||
Land deposits and preacquisition costs |
10,986 | 7,267 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventory |
$ | 994,103 | $ | 837,653 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Impairment
Inventory, including the captions above, are stated at cost, unless the carrying amount is determined to be unrecoverable, in which case inventories are adjusted to fair value (see Note 2).
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, there were no inventory impairment charges.
Interest Capitalization
Interest is capitalized on inventory and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during development and other qualifying activities. Interest capitalized as a cost of inventory is included in cost of sales when related units close. Interest capitalized as part of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is included in equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures when related units in the joint ventures close.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, interest incurred, capitalized and expensed was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest incurred |
$ | 16,774 | $ | 16,660 | $ | 33,542 | $ | 33,320 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest expensed (a) |
$ | 1,397 | $ | 5,909 | $ | 4,830 | $ | 12,197 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest capitalized as a cost of inventory during the period |
$ | 14,871 | $ | 10,550 | $ | 27,949 | $ | 20,745 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest previously capitalized as a cost of inventory, included in cost of sales |
$ | (15,393 | ) | $ | (10,074 | ) | $ | (24,904 | ) | $ | (17,858 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest capitalized in ending inventory (b) |
$ | 105,894 | $ | 114,323 | $ | 105,894 | $ | 114,323 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest capitalized as a cost of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the period |
$ | 506 | $ | 201 | $ | 763 | $ | 378 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest previously capitalized as a cost of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, included in equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ | (328 | ) | $ | (201 | ) | $ | (585 | ) | $ | (378 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Interest capitalized in ending investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ | 178 | $ | 0 | $ | 178 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, assets qualifying for interest capitalization were less than debt; therefore, non-qualifying interest was expensed. |
(b) | Inventory impairment charges were recorded against total inventory of the respective community. Capitalized interest reflects the gross amount of capitalized interest as impairment charges recognized were generally not allocated to specific components of inventory. |
10
7. Investments in Joint Ventures
Unconsolidated joint ventures, which we do not control but have significant influence through ownership interests generally up to 50%, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. These joint ventures are generally involved in real property development. Earnings and losses are allocated in accordance with terms of joint venture agreements.
Losses and distributions from joint ventures in excess of the carrying amount of our investment (Deficit Distributions) are included in other liabilities. We record Deficit Distributions since we are liable for this deficit to respective joint ventures. Deficit Distributions are offset by future earnings of, or future contributions to, joint ventures. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Deficit Distributions were $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, there were no impairment charges on investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total unconsolidated joint ventures notes payable were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Bank and seller notes payable: |
||||||||
Guaranteed (subject to remargin obligations) |
$ | 49,453 | $ | 45,610 | ||||
Non-guaranteed |
10,936 | 22,894 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total bank and seller notes payable (a) |
60,389 | 68,504 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Partner notes payable: |
||||||||
Unsecured (b) |
5,296 | 5,296 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total unconsolidated joint venture notes payable |
$ | 65,685 | $ | 73,800 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other unconsolidated joint venture notes payable (c) |
$ | 43,002 | $ | 57,839 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | All bank seller notes were secured by real property. |
(b) | No guarantees were provided on partner notes payable. |
(c) | We have an indirect effective ownership in two joint ventures of 12.3% and .0003%, respectively, that had bank notes payable secured by real property, which we have not guaranteed. |
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, remargin obligations and guarantees provided on debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures were on a joint and/or several basis and include, but are not limited to, project completion, interest and carry, and loan-to-value maintenance guarantees. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had an indemnification agreement from our joint venture partner for 90% of one secured loan balance, which was zero and zero, respectively. However, we cannot provide assurance we could collect under this indemnity agreement. In addition, for another joint venture, we have a remargin obligation that is limited to the lesser of 50% of the outstanding balances or $35.0 million in total for the joint venture loans, which outstanding loan balances were $49.4 million and $45.6 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Consequently, our maximum remargin obligation was $24.7 million and $22.8 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. We also have an indemnification agreement from our joint venture partner under which we could potentially recover a portion of any remargin payments we made to the bank. However, we cannot provide assurance we could collect under this indemnity agreement. No liabilities were recorded for these guarantees at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as the fair value of the secured real estate assets exceeded the outstanding notes payable.
Our ability to make joint venture and other restricted payments and investments is governed by the Indenture governing the Secured Notes (the Indenture). We are permitted to make otherwise restricted payments under (i) a $70.0 million revolving basket available solely for joint venture investments and (ii) a broader restricted payment basket available as long as our Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Indenture), is at least 2.0 to 1.0. The aggregate amount of the restricted payments made under this broader restricted payment basket cannot exceed 50% of our cumulative Consolidated Net Income (as defined in the Indenture), generated subsequent to the issuance of the Secured Notes plus the aggregate net cash proceeds of, and the fair market value of, any property or other asset received by the Company as a capital contribution or upon the issuance of indebtedness or certain securities by the Company since the issuance of the Secured Notes, plus, to the extent not included in Consolidated Net Income, certain amounts received in connection with dispositions, distributions or repayments of restricted investments, plus the value of any unrestricted subsidiary which is redesignated as a restricted subsidiary under the Indenture. We have a number of joint ventures which have used, and are expected to use, capacity under these restricted payment baskets. During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into a joint venture in Southern California and committed to contribute up to $45.0 million of capital. At June 30, 2013 we made aggregate capital contributions of $9.5 million to this joint venture.
11
8. Variable Interest Entities
ASC 810 requires a VIE to be consolidated in financial statements of a company if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Accordingly, the primary beneficiary has the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance, and the obligation to absorb its losses or the right to receive its benefits. All VIEs at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were evaluated to determine the primary beneficiary.
Joint Ventures
We enter into joint ventures for homebuilding and land development activities. Investments in these joint ventures may create a variable interest in a VIE, depending on contractual terms of the venture. We analyze our joint ventures in accordance with ASC 810 to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these joint ventures were not consolidated in our consolidated financial statements since they were not VIEs, or if they were VIEs, we were not the primary beneficiary.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had a variable interest in an unconsolidated joint venture determined to be a VIE. The joint venture, RRWS, LLC (RRWS), was formed in December 2012 and is owned 50% by the Company and 50% by a third-party real estate developer (the Partner). Several acquisition, development and construction loans were entered into by RRWS, each with two-year terms and options to extend for one year, subject to certain conditions. The Company and Partner each executed limited completion, interest and carry guarantees and environmental indemnities on a joint and several basis. The Company also has a maximum aggregate liability under the re-margin arrangements of the lesser of 50% of the outstanding balances or $35.0 million in total. The obligations of the Company and Partner under the re-margin arrangements are limited during the first two years of the loans. In addition to re-margin arrangements, the Partner, and several of its principals, executed repayment guarantees with no limit on their liability. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, outstanding bank notes payable were $49.5 million and $45.6 million, respectively, of which the Company has a maximum remargin obligation of $24.7 million and $22.8 million, respectively. The Company also has an indemnification agreement from the Partner, under which the Company could potentially recover a portion of any remargin payments made to the bank. However, the Company cannot provide assurance it could collect under this indemnity agreement.
In accordance with ASC 810, we determined we were not the primary beneficiary of RRWS because we did not have the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of RRWS, such as determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the entity, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the entity, and arranging financing for the entity.
Land Option Contracts
We enter into land option contracts to procure land for home construction. Use of land option and similar contracts allows us to reduce market risks associated with direct land ownership and development, reduces capital and financial commitments, including interest and other carrying costs, and minimizes land inventory. Under these contracts, we pay a specified deposit for the right to purchase land, usually at a predetermined price. Under the requirements of ASC 810, certain contracts may create a variable interest with the land seller.
In accordance with ASC 810, we analyzed our land option and similar contracts to determine if respective land sellers are VIEs and, if so, if we are the primary beneficiary. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, ASC 810 requires us to consolidate a VIE if we are the primary beneficiary. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we determined we were not the primary beneficiary of such VIEs because we did not have the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance, such as selling, transferring or developing land owned by the VIE.
At June 30, 2013, we had $2.0 million of refundable and non-refundable cash deposits associated with land option contracts with unconsolidated VIEs, having a $62.2 million remaining purchase price. We also had $4.7 million of refundable and non-refundable cash deposits associated with land option contracts that were not with VIEs, having a $293.2 million remaining purchase price.
Our loss exposure on land option contracts consists of non-refundable deposits, which were $5.8 million and $5.0 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and capitalized preacquisition costs of $4.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, which were included in inventory in the consolidated balance sheets.
12
9. Other Assets, Net
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, other assets were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Income tax receivable |
$ | 2,991 | $ | 3,497 | ||||
Investments |
9,399 | 12,078 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
2,142 | 2,237 | ||||||
Prepaid professional fees |
3,181 | 3,451 | ||||||
Prepaid loan fees |
6,164 | 6,688 | ||||||
Prepaid bank fees |
380 | 403 | ||||||
Deposits in lieu of bonds and letters of credit |
11,427 | 7,110 | ||||||
Prepaid insurance |
481 | 2,148 | ||||||
Other |
1,056 | 1,515 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other assets, net |
$ | 37,221 | $ | 39,127 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Investments
Investments consist of available-for-sale securities, primarily private debt obligations, and are measured at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices or cash flow models. Accordingly, unrealized gains and temporary losses on investments, net of tax, are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no realized gains on available-for-sale securities.
Prepaid Professional and Loan Fees
In accordance with ASC 470, these amounts are debt issuance costs and are amortized as interest over the term of the related debt.
Deposits in Lieu of Bonds and Letters of Credit
We are required to make cash deposits in lieu of bonds with various agencies for some of our homebuilding projects. These deposits may be returned as the collateral requirements decrease or they are replaced with new bonds.
In June 2010, due to maturity of an unsecured bank line of credit, certain letters of credit were presented for payment by the holders and the proceeds therefrom were recorded as deposits in lieu of letters of credit. These deposits may be returned as collateral requirements decrease or they are replaced with new letters of credit.
10. Notes Payable
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, notes payable were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
$750.0 million 8.625% senior secured notes, due May 2019 |
$ | 750,000 | $ | 750,000 | ||||
Promissory notes, interest ranging from 1% to 6%, maturing through 2014, secured by deeds of trust on inventory |
9,740 | 8,209 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total notes payable |
$ | 759,740 | $ | 758,209 | ||||
|
|
|
|
On May 10, 2011, our Secured Notes were issued at $750.0 million, bear interest at 8.625% paid semi-annually on May 15 and November 15, and do not require principal payments until maturity on May 15, 2019. The Secured Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the Companys option beginning on May 15, 2015 at a price of 104.313 per bond, reducing to 102.156 on May 15, 2016 and are redeemable at par beginning on May 15, 2017. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accrued interest was $8.1 million and $8.1 million, respectively.
The Indenture governing the Secured Notes contains covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness (including the issuance of certain preferred stock), pay dividends and distributions on our equity interests, repurchase our
13
equity interests, retire unsecured or subordinated notes more than one year prior to their maturity, make investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures that are not restricted subsidiaries that guarantee the Secured Notes, sell certain assets, incur liens, merge with or into other companies, expand unto unrelated businesses, and enter in certain transaction with our affiliates. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with these covenants.
11. Other Liabilities
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, other liabilities were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Completed operations |
$ | 131,248 | $ | 131,519 | ||||
Warranty reserves |
18,521 | 17,749 | ||||||
Deferred revenue/gain |
31,943 | 30,902 | ||||||
Provisions for closed homes/communities |
13,149 | 8,135 | ||||||
Deposits (primarily homebuyer) |
20,412 | 15,684 | ||||||
Legal reserves |
4,082 | 4,916 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
8,086 | 8,086 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
10,990 | 4,697 | ||||||
Distributions payable |
2,712 | 2,892 | ||||||
Deficit Distributions (see Note 7) |
504 | 716 | ||||||
Other |
5,243 | 7,922 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other liabilities |
$ | 246,890 | $ | 233,218 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Completed Operations
Reserves for completed operations primarily represent claims for property damage to completed homes and projects outside of our one-to-two year warranty period. Specific terms and conditions of completed operations claims vary depending on the market in which homes close and can range to 12 years from the close of a home. Expenses and liabilities are recorded for potential completed operations claims based upon aggregated loss experience, which includes an estimate of completed operations claims incurred but not reported, and is actuarially estimated using individual case-based valuations and statistical analysis. For policy years from August 1, 2001 through the present, completed operations claims are insured or reinsured through a combination of third-party and affiliate insurance carriers.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, changes in completed operations reserves were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Insured completed operations |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of the period |
$ | 131,250 | $ | 103,980 | $ | 131,519 | $ | 109,390 | ||||||||
Reserves provided (relieved) |
1,096 | 17,517 | 3,068 | 18,908 | ||||||||||||
Claims paid |
(1,098 | ) | (4,368 | ) | (3,339 | ) | (11,169 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance, end of the period |
$ | 131,248 | $ | 117,129 | $ | 131,248 | $ | 117,129 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves provided (relieved) for completed operations are generally fully offset by changes in insurance receivables (see Note 5), however, premiums paid for completed operations are included in cost of sales. For actual completed operations claims and estimates of completed operations claims incurred but not reported, we estimate and record insurance receivables under applicable policies when recovery is probable. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, insurance receivables were $131.2 million and $131.5 million, respectively.
Expenses, liabilities and receivables related to these claims are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in completed operations claims related to our markets and products built, claim settlement patterns and insurance industry practices. Although considerable variability is inherent in such estimates, we believe reserves for completed operations claims are adequate.
14
Warranty Reserve
We offer a limited one or two year warranty for our homes. Specific terms and conditions of these warranties vary depending on the market in which homes close. We estimate warranty costs to be incurred and record a liability and an expense to cost of sales when home revenue is recognized. We also include in our warranty reserve the uncovered losses related to completed operations coverage, which approximates 12.5% of the total property damage estimate. Factors affecting warranty liability include number of homes closed, historical and anticipated warranty claims, and cost per claim history and trends. We periodically assess adequacy of our warranty liabilities and adjust amounts as necessary.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, changes in warranty liability were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of the period |
$ | 17,927 | $ | 16,660 | $ | 17,749 | $ | 17,358 | ||||||||
Provision for warranties |
2,641 | 1,668 | 4,386 | 3,143 | ||||||||||||
Warranty costs paid |
(2,047 | ) | (1,982 | ) | (3,614 | ) | (4,155 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance, end of the period |
$ | 18,521 | $ | 16,346 | $ | 18,521 | $ | 16,346 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue/Gain
Deferred revenue/gain represents deferred profit on transactions in which an insufficient down payment was received or a future performance, passage of time or event is required. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, deferred revenue/gain primarily represents the PIC Transaction described below.
Completed operations claims were insured through PIC for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2007. In December 2009, PIC entered into a series of novation and reinsurance transactions (the PIC Transaction).
First, PIC entered into a novation agreement with JFSCI to novate its deductible reimbursement obligations related to its workers compensation and general liability risks at September 30, 2009 for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2007, and its completed operations risks from August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2007. Concurrently, JFSCI entered into insurance arrangements with unrelated third party insurance carriers to insure these policies. As a result of this novation, a $19.2 million gain was originally deferred and will be recognized as income when related claims are paid. In addition, the deferred gain may be adjusted either up or down as changes to the underlying insurance reserves occur based on actuarial estimates. An increase to the deferred gain will result in a current period charge while a decrease in the deferred gain will result in current period income. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unamortized deferred gain was $19.7 million and $20.3 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of this deferral as income, which was included in other income (expense), net and represented the impact of a decrease in the deferred gain due to actuarial estimates and income recognition on claims paid. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $(2.3) million and $(1.7) million, respectively, of this deferral as expense, which was included in other income (expense), net and represented the impact of an increase in the deferred gain due to actuarial estimates, partially offset by income recognition on claims paid.
Second, PIC entered into reinsurance agreements with various unrelated reinsurers that reinsured 100% of the completed operations risks from August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2005. As a result of the reinsurance, a $15.6 million gain was originally deferred and will be recognized as income when the related claims are paid. In addition, the deferred gain can be increased or decreased based on changes in actuarial estimates. Any changes to the deferred gain will be recognized as a current period gain or charge. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unamortized deferred gain was $9.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $(1.2) million and $(0.7) million, respectively, of this deferral as expense, which was included in other income (expense), net. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $(5.9) million and $(5.7) million, respectively, of this deferral as expense, which was included in other income (expense), net. The expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 represented the impact of an increase in the deferred gain due to actuarial estimates, partially offset by income recognition on claims paid.
As a result of the PIC Transaction, if the estimated ultimate loss to be paid under these policies exceeds the policy limits under the novation and reinsurance transactions, the shortfall is expected to be funded by JFSCI for the policies novated to JFSCI and by PIC for the policies they reinsured.
15
Distributions Payable
In December 2011, our consolidated joint venture, Vistancia, LLC, sold its remaining interest in an unconsolidated joint venture (the Vistancia Sale). As a result of the Vistancia Sale, no other assets of Vistancia, LLC economically benefit the former non-controlling member of Vistancia, LLC and the Company recorded the remaining $3.3 million distribution payable to this member, which is paid $0.1 million quarterly. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the remaining distribution payable was $2.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
12. Related Party Transactions
Related Party Receivables and Payables
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, receivables from related parties, net were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Note receivable from JFSCI |
$ | 24,648 | $ | 24,498 | ||||
Note receivable from unconsolidated joint venture |
279 | 268 | ||||||
Notes receivable from related parties |
19,385 | 19,940 | ||||||
Reserves for note receivables from related parties |
(12,803 | ) | (12,766 | ) | ||||
Receivables from related parties |
2,975 | 2,088 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total receivables from related parties, net |
$ | 34,484 | $ | 34,028 | ||||
|
|
|
|
In May 2011, concurrent with issuance of the Secured Notes, the previous unsecured receivable from JFSCI was partially paid down and the balance converted to a $38.9 million unsecured term note receivable, bearing 4% interest, payable in equal quarterly installments and maturing May 15, 2019. In 2013 and 2012, JFSCI elected to make prepayments, including accrued interest, of $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and applied these prepayments to future installments such that JFSCI would not be required to make a payment until November 2014. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the note receivable from JFSCI, including accrued interest, was $24.6 million and $24.5 million, respectively. Quarterly, we evaluate collectability of the note receivable from JFSCI, which includes consideration of JFSCIs payment history, operating performance and future payment requirements under the note. Based on these criteria, and as JFSCI applied prepayments under the note to defer future installments until August 2014, we do not anticipate collection risks on the note receivable from JFSCI.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, note receivable from unconsolidated joint venture, including accrued interest, was $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The note receivable bears interest at 8% and matures in 2020. Further, this note earns additional interest to achieve a 17.5% internal rate of return, subject to available cash flows of the joint venture, and can be repaid prior to 2020. Quarterly, we evaluate collectability of this note, which includes consideration of prior payment history, operating performance and future payment requirements under the applicable note. Based on these criteria, we do not anticipate collection risks on this note.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, notes receivable from other related parties, including accrued interest, were $6.6 million and $7.2 million, respectively, net of related reserves of $12.8 million and $12.8 million, respectively. These notes are unsecured and mature from August 2016 through April 2021. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these notes bore interest ranging from Prime less .75% (2.5%) to 4.25%. Quarterly, we evaluate collectability of these notes which includes consideration of prior payment history, operating performance and future payment requirements under the applicable notes. At December 31, 2009, based on these criteria, two notes receivable were deemed uncollectible and fully reserved. We do not anticipate collection risks on the other notes.
The Company, entities under common control and certain unconsolidated joint ventures also engage in transactions on behalf of the other, such as payment of invoices and payroll. The amounts resulting from these transactions are recorded in receivables from related parties or payables to related parties, are non-interest bearing, due on demand and generally paid monthly. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these receivables were $3.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and these payables were $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
In May 2012, for a nominal amount, SHLP purchased the non-controlling members entire 16.7% interest in Vistancia, LLC, a consolidated joint venture. However, the distribution payable remained (see Note 11).
In March 2012, SHLPs entire 58% interest in Shea Colorado, LLC (SCLLC), a consolidated joint venture with Shea Properties II, LLC, a related party and the non-controlling member, was redeemed by SCLLC. In valuing its 58% interest in SCLLC, and to ensure receipt of net assets of equal value to its ownership interest, SHLP used third-party real estate appraisals. The estimated fair value of the assets received by SHLP was $30.8 million. However, as the non-controlling member is a related party under common control, the assets and liabilities received by SHLP were recorded at net book value and the difference in SHLPs investment in SCLLC and the net book value of the assets and liabilities received was recorded as a reduction to SHLPs equity.
16
As consideration for the redemption, SCLLC distributed assets and liabilities to SHLP having a net book value of $24.0 million, including $2.2 million cash, a $3.0 million secured note receivable, $20.0 million of inventory and $1.2 million of other liabilities. As a result of this redemption, SCLLC is no longer included in these consolidated financial statements effective March 31, 2012. This transaction resulted in a net reduction of $41.8 million in assets and $2.0 million in liabilities, and a $39.8 million reduction in total equity, of which $11.6 million was attributable to SHLP and $28.2 million was attributable to non-controlling interests.
At June 30, 2013 and 2012, we were the managing member for nine and seven, respectively, unconsolidated joint ventures and received a management fee from these joint ventures as reimbursement for direct and overhead costs incurred on behalf of the joint ventures and other associated costs. Fees from joint ventures representing reimbursement of our costs are recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expense. Fees from joint ventures representing amounts in excess of our costs are recorded as revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, $2.0 million and $3.6 million of management fees, respectively, were offset against general and administrative expenses, and $0.1 million and $0.1 million of management fees, respectively, were included in revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $0.7 million and $1.7 million of management fees, respectively, were offset against general and administrative expenses, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million of management fees, respectively, were included in revenues.
Other Related Party Transactions
JFSCI provides corporate services to us, including management, legal, tax, information technology, risk management, facilities, accounting, treasury and human resources. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expenses included $5.9 million and $11.1 million, respectively, for corporate services provided by JFSCI. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses included $4.5 million and $8.4 million, respectively, for corporate services provided by JFSCI.
We lease office space from related parties under non-cancelable operating leases. Leases are for five to ten year terms and generally provide for five year renewal options. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, related-party rental expense was $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, related-party rental expense was $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
We obtain workers compensation insurance, commercial general liability insurance and insurance for completed operations losses and damages with respect to our homebuilding operations from affiliate and unrelated third party insurance providers. These policies are purchased by affiliate entities and we pay premiums to these affiliates for the coverage provided by these third party and affiliate insurance providers. Policies covering these risks are written at various coverage levels but include a large self-insured retention or deductible. We have retention liability insurance from affiliated entities to insure these large retentions or deductibles. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, amounts paid to affiliates for this retention insurance coverage were $3.9 million and $7.8 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, amounts paid to affiliates for this retention insurance coverage were $3.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
13. Income Taxes
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, income tax benefit (expense) was $(0.4) million. At June 30, 2013, the net deferred tax asset was $31.5 million, which primarily related to available loss carryforwards, inventory and investment impairments, and housing inventory and land basis differences. The $31.5 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance fully reserves the net deferred tax asset due to inherent uncertainty of future income as the housing recovery is in its early stages. We will continue to monitor industry and economic conditions, and our ability to generate taxable income based on our business plan and available tax planning strategies, which would allow us to utilize the tax benefits of the net deferred tax assets and thereby allow us to reverse all, or a portion of, our valuation allowance.
In 2009, we filed a petition with the United States Tax Court (the Tax Court) regarding our position on the completed contract method of accounting for homebuilding activities by SHLP, SHI and subsidiaries. During 2010 and 2011, we engaged in formal and informal discovery with the IRS and the Tax Court heard trial testimony in July 2012 and ordered the Company and the IRS to exchange briefs, all of which have been filed. We expect the Tax Court to render its decision sometime during 2013 or 2014. We expect our position will prevail, and have accordingly, not recorded a liability for related taxes or interest for SHI and its subsidiaries. Furthermore, as a limited partnership, any income taxes, interest or penalties which may be imposed on SHLP are the responsibility of the Partners and are not reflected in the tax provision in these consolidated financial statements. However, if the Tax Court rules in favor of the IRS, which is reasonably possible, SHI could be obligated to pay the IRS and applicable state taxing authorities up to $64 million and, under the Tax Distribution Agreement, SHLP could be obligated to make a distribution to the Partners up to $107 million to fund their related payments to the IRS and the applicable state taxing authorities. However, the Indenture provides that the amount we may pay on behalf of SHI and distribute to the partners of SHLP for this matter may not exceed $70.0 million. Any potential shortfall would be absorbed by the Partners of SHLP (see Note 15).
17
14. Owners Equity
Owners equity consists of partners preferred and common capital. Common capital is comprised of limited partners with a collective 78.38% ownership and a general partner with a 20.62% ownership. Preferred capital is comprised of limited partners with either series B (Series B) or series D (Series D) classification. Series B holders have no ownership interest but earn a preferred return at Prime less 2.05% per annum through December 31, 2012 (1.2% at December 31, 2012) on unreturned capital balances and Series D holders have a 1% ownership interest and earn a preferred return at 7% per annum through December 31, 2012 on unreturned preferred capital balances. In August 2013, the Agreement was amended and the rates on the Series B and Series D were changed, effective January 1, 2013. Series B earns a rate of 1.2% from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016, 2.25% from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020, and Prime less 2.05% from January 1, 2021 and thereafter on unreturned capital balances. Series D earns a rate of 2.0% from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016, 12.75% from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020, and 7.0% from January 1, 2021 and thereafter on unreturned capital balances. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accumulated undistributed preferred returns for Series B holders were $21.7 million and $20.8 million, respectively. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accumulated undistributed preferred returns for Series D holders were $54.7 million and $52.8 million, respectively.
Net income is allocated to Partners in a priority order that considers previously allocated net losses and preferred return considerations and, thereafter, in proportion to their respective ownership interests. Net loss is allocated in a priority order to Partners generally in proportion to their ownership interests and adjusted capital account balances, and, thereafter, to the general partner.
The general partner, in its sole discretion, may make additional capital contributions or accept additional capital contributions from the limited partners. Cash distributions are made to Partners in proportion to their unpaid preferred returns, unreturned capital and, thereafter, in proportion to their ownership interests. Distributions to Partners are made at the discretion of the general partner, including payment of personal income taxes related to the Company. In addition, distributions to Partners from other entities under control of Shea family members, such as JFSCI, can be used for payment of personal incomes taxes related to the Company and other uses.
15. Contingencies and Commitments
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, certain unrecorded contingent liabilities and commitments were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Tax Court CCM case (capped at $70.0 million) |
$ | 70,000 | $ | 70,000 | ||||
Remargin obligations and guarantees for unconsolidated joint ventures (see Note 7) |
24,726 | 22,805 | ||||||
Outstanding letters of credit |
457 | 4,216 | ||||||
Costs to complete on surety bonds for Company projects |
94,672 | 85,490 | ||||||
Costs to complete on surety bonds for joint venture projects |
27,659 | 30,804 | ||||||
Costs to complete on surety bonds for related party projects |
2,274 | 2,311 | ||||||
Water system connection rights purchase obligation |
33,615 | 33,615 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total unrecorded contingent liabilities and commitments |
$ | 253,403 | $ | 249,241 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Legal Claims
Lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been and will likely be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, employment practices and environmental protection. As a result, we are subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations.
We record a reserve for potential legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable, and are based on specific facts and circumstances, and we revise these estimates when necessary. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had reserves of $4.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively, net of expected recoveries, relating to these claims and matters, and while their outcome cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe we have appropriately reserved for them. However, if the liability arising from their resolution exceeds their recorded reserves, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.
Due to the inherent difficulty of predicting outcomes of legal claims and related contingencies, we generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. If our evaluations indicate loss contingencies that could be material are not probable, but are reasonably possible, we will disclose their nature with an estimate of possible range of losses or a statement that such loss is not reasonably estimable. At June 30, 2013, the range of reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts recorded was not material.
18
As described in Note 13, in 2009, we filed a petition with the Tax Court regarding our position on the completed contract method of accounting (CCM) for homebuilding activities. The Tax Court heard trial testimony in July 2012 and ordered the Company and the IRS to exchange briefs, all of which have been filed. We expect the Tax Court to render its decision sometime during 2013 or 2014. We expect our position will prevail, and accordingly, no liability for related taxes or interest has been recorded. However, if the Tax Court rules in favor of the IRS, which is reasonably possible, SHI could be obligated to pay the IRS and applicable state taxing authorities up to $64 million and SHLP could be obligated to make a distribution to the Partners up to $107 million to fund their related payments to the IRS and the applicable state taxing authorities.
Notwithstanding, the Indenture governing the Secured Notes restricts SHLPs ability to make distributions to its partners pursuant to the Tax Distributions Agreement in excess of an amount specified by the indenture (such maximum amount of collective distributions referred to as the Maximum CCM Payment), unless SHLP receives a cash equity contribution from JFSCI for such excess. The initial Maximum CCM Payment is $70.0 million, which will be reduced by payments made by SHI in connection with any resolution of our dispute with the IRS regarding our use of CCM and payments made by SHLP on certain guarantee obligations described in the Indenture. SHLP and SHI expect to pay any CCM-related tax liability from existing cash, cash from operations and, to the extent SHLP is required by the Tax Distribution Agreement to pay amounts in excess of the Maximum CCM Payment, from cash equity contributions by JFSCI.
Letters of Credit, Surety Bonds and Project Obligations
On May 10, 2011, we entered into a $75.0 million letter of credit facility. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, outstanding letters of credit against the letter of credit facility were $0.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
We provide surety bonds that guarantee completion of certain infrastructure serving our homebuilding projects. At June 30, 2013, there were $94.7 million of costs to complete in connection with the $182.5 million of surety bonds that were issued. At December 31, 2012, there were $85.5 million of costs to complete in connection with the $186.0 million of surety bonds that were issued.
We also provided indemnification for bonds issued by certain unconsolidated joint ventures and other related party projects in which we have no ownership interest. At June 30, 2013, there were $27.7 million of costs to complete in connection with $64.5 million of surety bonds that were issued for unconsolidated joint venture projects, and $2.3 million of costs to complete in connection with $5.8 million of surety bonds that were issued for related party projects. At December 31, 2012, $30.8 million of costs to complete in connection with $71.6 million of surety bonds were issued for unconsolidated joint venture projects, and $2.3 million of costs to complete in connection with $6.1 million of surety bonds that were issued for related party projects.
Certain of our homebuilding projects utilize community facility district, metro-district and other local government bond financing programs to fund acquisition or construction of infrastructure improvements. Interest and principal on these bonds are typically paid from taxes and assessments levied on homeowners following the sale of new homes within the project. Occasionally, we enter into credit support arrangements requiring us to pay interest and principal on these bonds if the taxes and assessments levied on homeowners are insufficient to cover such obligations. Furthermore, reimbursement of these payments to us is dependent on the district or local governments ability to generate sufficient tax and assessment revenues from the sale of new homes. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, in connection with a credit support arrangement, there was $6.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively, reimbursable to us from a metro-district in Colorado.
We also pay certain fees and costs associated with the construction of infrastructure improvements in homebuilding projects that utilize these district bond financing programs. These fees and costs are typically reimbursable to us from, and therefore dependent on, bond proceeds or taxes and assessments levied on homeowners. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, in connection with certain funding arrangements, there was $12.7 million and $16.3 million, respectively, reimbursable to us from certain metro-districts, including $11.4 million and $11.9 million, respectively, from a metro-district in Colorado.
Until bond proceeds or tax and assessment revenues are sufficient to cover our obligations and/or reimburse us, our responsibility to make interest and principal payments on these bonds or pay fees and costs associated with the construction of infrastructure improvements could be prolonged and significant.
As a condition of the Vistancia Sale, and the purchase of the non-controlling members remaining interest in Vistancia, LLC, the Company effectively remains a 10% guarantor on certain community facility district bond obligations to which the Company must meet a minimum calculated tangible net worth; otherwise, the Company is required to fund collateral to the bond issuer. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company exceeded the minimum tangible net worth requirement.
In one consolidated homebuilding project, we have contractual obligations to purchase and receive water system connection rights which, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, had an estimated market value in excess of their contractual purchase price of $33.6 million. These water system connection rights are held and then transferred to homebuyers upon closing of their home or transferred upon sale of land to the respective buyer. These water system connection rights can also be sold or leased but generally only within the local jurisdiction.
19
16. Supplemental Disclosure to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Income taxes paid (refunded) |
$ | 66 | $ | (2,391 | ) | |||
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 4,689 | $ | 11,853 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities |
||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net |
$ | 237 | $ | 802 | ||||
Reclassification of Deficit Distributions to (from) unconsolidated joint ventures from (to) other liabilities |
$ | (212 | ) | $ | (82 | ) | ||
Purchase of land in exchange for note payable |
$ | 2,283 | $ | 1,097 | ||||
Elimination of joint venture inventory, receivables from related parties and other assets |
$ | 0 | $ | (41,600 | ) | |||
Elimination of joint venture note payable and other liabilities |
$ | 0 | $ | (1,949 | ) | |||
Redemption of Companys interest in consolidated joint venture and elimination of non-controlling interest, less cash retained by non-controlling interest |
$ | 0 | $ | (39,651 | ) |
17. Segment Information
Our homebuilding business, which is responsible for most of our operating results, constructs and sells single-family attached and detached homes designed to appeal to first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers. Our homebuilding business also provides management services to joint ventures and other related and unrelated parties. We manage each homebuilding community as an operating segment and have aggregated these communities into reportable segments based on geography as follows:
| Southern California, comprised of communities in Los Angeles, Ventura and Orange Counties, and the Inland Empire; |
| San Diego, comprised of communities in San Diego County, California; |
| Northern California, comprised of communities in northern and central California, and the central coast of California; |
| Mountain West, comprised of communities in Colorado and Washington; |
| South West, comprised of communities in Arizona and Nevada; and |
| Other, comprised of communities in Florida. |
In accordance with ASC 280, in determining the most appropriate aggregation of our homebuilding communities, we also considered similar economic and other characteristics, including product types, average selling prices, gross profits, production processes, suppliers, subcontractors, regulatory environments, land acquisition results, and underlying demand and supply.
Our Corporate segment primarily provides management services to our operating segments, and includes results of our captive insurance provider, which primarily administers claims reinsured by third party carriers and the deductibles and retentions under those third party policies. Results of our insurance brokerage services business are also included in our Corporate segment.
The reportable segments follow the same accounting policies as our consolidated financial statements described in Note 2. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.
20
Financial information relating to reportable segments was as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||
Southern California |
$ | 271,882 | $ | 213,481 | ||||
San Diego |
171,691 | 148,272 | ||||||
Northern California |
298,340 | 256,728 | ||||||
Mountain West |
334,449 | 297,276 | ||||||
South West |
123,314 | 105,470 | ||||||
Other |
6,318 | 6,943 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total homebuilding assets |
1,205,994 | 1,028,170 | ||||||
Corporate |
205,563 | 345,367 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,411,557 | $ | 1,373,537 | ||||
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Inventory: |
||||||||
Southern California |
$ | 213,816 | $ | 161,700 | ||||
San Diego |
152,820 | 129,895 | ||||||
Northern California |
260,990 | 226,307 | ||||||
Mountain West |
261,872 | 227,130 | ||||||
South West |
102,233 | 89,756 | ||||||
Other |
2,372 | 2,865 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventory |
$ | 994,103 | $ | 837,653 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
$ | 56,134 | $ | 30,104 | $ | 96,289 | $ | 56,484 | ||||||||
San Diego |
31,358 | 10,180 | 40,988 | 24,287 | ||||||||||||
Northern California |
53,483 | 30,438 | 81,132 | 56,396 | ||||||||||||
Mountain West |
39,884 | 33,211 | 62,190 | 51,806 | ||||||||||||
South West |
34,151 | 26,700 | 67,684 | 46,215 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,964 | 1,585 | 3,530 | 2,390 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
216,974 | 132,218 | 351,813 | 237,578 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
336 | 250 | 457 | 493 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 217,310 | $ | 132,468 | $ | 352,270 | $ | 238,071 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
$ | 12,249 | $ | 3,302 | $ | 20,138 | $ | 5,276 | ||||||||
San Diego |
1,004 | (1,502 | ) | (420 | ) | (1,500 | ) | |||||||||
Northern California |
5,648 | 612 | 7,542 | 1,429 | ||||||||||||
Mountain West |
2,108 | (1,786 | ) | (690 | ) | (5,154 | ) | |||||||||
South West |
169 | (1,494 | ) | 1,144 | (3,150 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
51 | 25 | (302 | ) | (225 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes |
21,229 | (843 | ) | 27,412 | (3,324 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate |
(1,218 | ) | (10,429 | ) | (623 | ) | (8,898 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 20,011 | $ | (11,272 | ) | $ | 26,789 | $ | (12,222 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
18. Supplemental Guarantor Information
The obligations under the Secured Notes are not guaranteed by any SHLP joint venture where SHLP and Shea Homes Funding Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary (collectively SHLP Corp.), does not own 100% of the economic interest, including those that are consolidated, and the collateral securing the Secured Notes does not include a pledge of the capital stock of any subsidiary if such pledge would result in a requirement that SHLP Corp file separate financial statements with respect to such subsidiary pursuant to Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act.
Pursuant to the Indenture governing the Secured Notes, a guarantor may be released from its guarantee obligations only under certain customary circumstances specified in the Indenture, namely (1) upon the sale or other disposition (including by way of consolidation or merger) of such guarantor, (2) upon sale of disposition of all or substantially all the assets of such guarantor, (3) upon the designation of such guarantor as an unrestricted subsidiary for covenant purposes in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, (4) upon a legal defeasance or covenant defeasance pursuant to the Indenture, or (5) upon the full satisfaction of our obligations under the Indenture.
Presented herein are the condensed consolidated financial statements provided for in Rule 3-10(f) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act for the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries.
22
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2013
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 129,146 | $ | (375 | ) | $ | 29,226 | $ | 0 | $ | 157,997 | |||||||||
Restricted cash |
1,485 | 682 | 167 | 0 | 2,334 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
117,724 | 27,969 | 35,017 | (34,692 | ) | 146,018 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables from related parties, net |
9,493 | 24,965 | 26 | 0 | 34,484 | |||||||||||||||
Inventory |
675,830 | 316,507 | 2,262 | (496 | ) | 994,103 | ||||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
19,602 | 995 | 18,803 | 0 | 39,400 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries |
706,597 | 63,778 | 92,483 | (862,858 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
19,152 | 17,665 | 404 | 0 | 37,221 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
0 | 390,316 | 0 | (390,316 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,679,029 | $ | 842,502 | $ | 178,388 | $ | (1,288,362 | ) | $ | 1,411,557 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 759,740 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 759,740 | ||||||||||
Payables to related parties |
20 | 5 | 5 | 4,129 | 4,159 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
31,863 | 22,745 | 307 | 0 | 54,915 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
170,201 | 41,569 | 70,308 | (35,188 | ) | 246,890 | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
371,758 | 0 | 22,687 | (394,445 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,333,582 | 64,319 | 93,307 | (425,504 | ) | 1,065,704 | ||||||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
SHLP equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Owners equity |
340,693 | 773,429 | 84,675 | (858,104 | ) | 340,693 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
4,754 | 4,754 | 0 | (4,754 | ) | 4,754 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total SHLP equity |
345,447 | 778,183 | 84,675 | (862,858 | ) | 345,447 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 406 | 0 | 406 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total equity |
345,447 | 778,183 | 85,081 | (862,858 | ) | 345,853 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,679,029 | $ | 452,186 | $ | 178,388 | $ | (898,046 | ) | $ | 1,411,557 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp., whose financial position at June 30, 2013 was not material. |
23
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2012
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 216,914 | $ | 48,895 | $ | 13,947 | $ | 0 | $ | 279,756 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash |
11,999 | 875 | 157 | 0 | 13,031 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
117,560 | 23,537 | 35,250 | (35,058 | ) | 141,289 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables from related parties, net |
8,271 | 25,668 | 89 | 0 | 34,028 | |||||||||||||||
Inventory |
572,010 | 264,459 | 1,918 | (734 | ) | 837,653 | ||||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
13,948 | 984 | 13,721 | 0 | 28,653 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries |
672,388 | 64,971 | 93,883 | (831,242 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
17,712 | 21,388 | 27 | 0 | 39,127 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
0 | 376,420 | 0 | (376,420 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,630,802 | $ | 827,197 | $ | 158,992 | $ | (1,243,454 | ) | $ | 1,373,537 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 758,209 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 758,209 | ||||||||||
Payables to related parties |
26 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 125 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
34,384 | 27,879 | 475 | 0 | 62,738 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
162,894 | 36,700 | 69,416 | (35,792 | ) | 233,218 | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
356,451 | 0 | 20,068 | (376,519 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,311,964 | 64,579 | 89,959 | (412,212 | ) | 1,054,290 | ||||||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
SHLP equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Owners equity |
314,321 | 758,101 | 68,624 | (826,725 | ) | 314,321 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
4,517 | 4,517 | 0 | (4,517 | ) | 4,517 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total SHLP equity |
318,838 | 762,618 | 68,624 | (831,242 | ) | 318,838 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 409 | 0 | 409 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total equity |
318,838 | 762,618 | 69,033 | (831,242 | ) | 319,247 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,630,802 | $ | 450,777 | $ | 158,992 | $ | (867,034 | ) | $ | 1,373,537 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp., whose financial position at December 31, 2012 was not material. |
24
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 131,140 | $ | 80,181 | $ | 5,989 | $ | 0 | $ | 217,310 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
(108,600 | ) | (60,071 | ) | (356 | ) | 143 | (168,884 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross margin |
22,540 | 20,110 | 5,633 | 143 | 48,426 | |||||||||||||||
Selling expenses |
(7,526 | ) | (3,834 | ) | (1,488 | ) | 0 | (12,848 | ) | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(8,749 | ) | (4,732 | ) | (597 | ) | 0 | (14,078 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
23 | (3 | ) | 458 | 0 | 478 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from subsidiaries |
15,098 | (1,589 | ) | (799 | ) | (12,710 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on reinsurance transaction |
0 | 0 | (807 | ) | 0 | (807 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(998 | ) | (399 | ) | 0 | 0 | (1,397 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(854 | ) | 727 | 507 | (143 | ) | 237 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
19,534 | 10,280 | 2,907 | (12,710 | ) | 20,011 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
0 | (475 | ) | (4 | ) | 0 | (479 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
19,534 | 9,805 | 2,903 | (12,710 | ) | 19,532 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | 19,534 | $ | 9,805 | $ | 2,905 | $ | (12,710 | ) | $ | 19,534 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 19,641 | $ | 9,912 | $ | 2,903 | $ | (12,817 | ) | $ | 19,639 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp.; no significant activity occurred in 2013. |
25
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 96,466 | $ | 34,700 | $ | 1,302 | $ | 0 | $ | 132,468 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
(80,318 | ) | (27,496 | ) | (259 | ) | 95 | (107,978 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross margin |
16,148 | 7,204 | 1,043 | 95 | 24,490 | |||||||||||||||
Selling expenses |
(6,234 | ) | (2,839 | ) | (1,126 | ) | 0 | (10,199 | ) | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(7,995 | ) | (2,979 | ) | (599 | ) | 0 | (11,573 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
10 | (7 | ) | 314 | 0 | 317 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from subsidiaries |
(6,541 | ) | (9,534 | ) | (1,166 | ) | 17,241 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on reinsurance transaction |
0 | 0 | (8,163 | ) | 0 | (8,163 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,511 | ) | (398 | ) | 0 | 0 | (5,909 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other (expense) income, net |
(1,977 | ) | 1,368 | 469 | (95 | ) | (235 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(12,100 | ) | (7,185 | ) | (9,228 | ) | 17,241 | (11,272 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(1 | ) | (838 | ) | (9 | ) | 0 | (848 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(12,101 | ) | (8,023 | ) | (9,237 | ) | 17,241 | (12,120 | ) | |||||||||||
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | (12,101 | ) | $ | (8,023 | ) | $ | (9,218 | ) | $ | 17,241 | $ | (12,101 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (12,742 | ) | $ | (8,664 | ) | $ | (9,237 | ) | $ | 17,882 | $ | (12,761 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp.; no significant activity occurred in 2012. |
26
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive income (Loss)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 201,105 | $ | 139,356 | $ | 11,809 | $ | 0 | $ | 352,270 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
(164,380 | ) | (107,457 | ) | (709 | ) | 238 | (272,308 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross margin |
36,725 | 31,899 | 11,100 | 238 | 79,962 | |||||||||||||||
Selling expenses |
(12,732 | ) | (7,224 | ) | (3,046 | ) | 0 | (23,002 | ) | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(16,320 | ) | (8,229 | ) | (1,486 | ) | 0 | (26,035 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
(640 | ) | (22 | ) | 508 | 0 | (154 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from subsidiaries |
24,505 | (1,194 | ) | (1,332 | ) | (21,979 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on reinsurance transaction |
0 | 0 | (159 | ) | 0 | (159 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(3,432 | ) | (1,398 | ) | 0 | 0 | (4,830 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(1,731 | ) | 1,968 | 1,008 | (238 | ) | 1,007 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
26,375 | 15,800 | 6,593 | (21,979 | ) | 26,789 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(3 | ) | (405 | ) | (12 | ) | 0 | (420 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
26,372 | 15,395 | 6,581 | (21,979 | ) | 26,369 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | 26,372 | $ | 15,395 | $ | 6,584 | $ | (21,979 | ) | $ | 26,372 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 26,609 | $ | 15,632 | $ | 6,581 | $ | (22,216 | ) | $ | 26,606 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp.; no significant activity occurred in 2013. |
27
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 164,252 | $ | 71,027 | $ | 2,792 | $ | 0 | $ | 238,071 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
(134,524 | ) | (58,203 | ) | (445 | ) | 159 | (193,013 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross margin |
29,728 | 12,824 | 2,347 | 159 | 45,058 | |||||||||||||||
Selling expenses |
(11,613 | ) | (5,831 | ) | (2,107 | ) | 0 | (19,551 | ) | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(13,599 | ) | (5,030 | ) | (1,195 | ) | 0 | (19,824 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
139 | (31 | ) | 276 | 0 | 384 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from subsidiaries |
(2,790 | ) | (10,387 | ) | (2,443 | ) | 15,620 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on reinsurance transaction |
0 | 0 | (7,367 | ) | 0 | (7,367 | )) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(11,469 | ) | (724 | ) | (4 | ) | 0 | (12,197 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(2,903 | ) | 3,213 | 1,124 | (159 | ) | 1,275 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(12,507 | ) | (5,966 | ) | (9,369 | ) | 15,620 | (12,222 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(5 | ) | (86 | ) | (5 | ) | 0 | (96 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(12,512 | ) | (6,052 | ) | (9,374 | ) | 15,620 | (12,318 | ) | |||||||||||
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests |
0 | 0 | (194 | ) | 0 | (194 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | (12,512 | ) | $ | (6,052 | ) | $ | (9,568 | ) | $ | 15,620 | $ | (12,512 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (11,710 | ) | $ | (5,250 | ) | $ | (9,374 | ) | $ | 14,818 | $ | (11,516 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp.; no significant activity occurred in 2012. |
28
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
SHLP Corp. (a) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (86,654 | ) | $ | (38,172 | ) | $ | 12,630 | $ | 4,030 | $ | (108,166 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
(6,792 | ) | (53 | ) | (9,505 | ) | 0 | (16,350 | ) | |||||||||||
Other investing activities |
590 | 2,919 | 0 | 0 | 3,509 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(6,202 | ) | 2,866 | (9,505 | ) | 0 | (12,841 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
5,840 | (13,964 | ) | 12,154 | (4,030 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||
Principal payments to financial institutions and others |
(752 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (752 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
5,088 | (13,964 | ) | 12,154 | (4,030 | ) | (752 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(87,768 | ) | (49,270 | ) | 15,279 | 0 | (121,759 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
216,914 | 48,895 | 13,947 | 0 | 279,756 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 129,146 | $ | (375 | ) | $ | 29,226 | $ | 0 | $ | 157,997 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp.; no significant activity occurred in 2013. |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
SHLP Corp. (b) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ | (28,900 | ) | $ | (29,876 | ) | $ | 22,534 | $ | 2,538 | $ | (33,704 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments |
0 | 5,212 | 0 | 0 | 5,212 | |||||||||||||||
Other investing activities |
131 | 1,536 | (784 | ) | 0 | 883 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
131 | 6,748 | (784 | ) | 0 | 6,095 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
11,860 | 14,613 | (23,935 | ) | (2,538 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||
Other financing activities |
(854 | ) | 0 | 1,034 | 0 | 180 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
11,006 | 14,613 | (22,901 | ) | (2,538 | ) | 180 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(17,763 | ) | (8,515 | ) | (1,151 | ) | 0 | (27,429 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
157,511 | 96,100 | 14,755 | 0 | 268,366 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 139,748 | $ | 87,585 | $ | 13,604 | $ | 0 | $ | 240,937 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) | Includes Shea Homes Funding Corp.; no significant activity occurred in 2012. |
29
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included under Item 1 of this Report and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The tabular homebuilding operating data presented throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes data for SHLP and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint ventures. Data for our unconsolidated joint ventures is presented separately where indicated. Our ownership in unconsolidated joint ventures varies, but is generally less than or equal to 50%.
Our homebuilding business, which is responsible for most of our operating results, constructs and sells single-family attached and detached homes designed to appeal to first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers. Our homebuilding business also provides management services to joint ventures and other related and unrelated parties. We manage each homebuilding community as an operating segment and have aggregated these communities into reportable segments based on geography as follows:
| Southern California, comprised of communities in Los Angeles, Ventura and Orange Counties, and the Inland Empire; |
| San Diego, comprised of communities in San Diego County, California; |
| Northern California, comprised of communities in northern and central California, and the central coast of California; |
| Mountain West, comprised of communities in Colorado and Washington; |
| South West, comprised of communities in Arizona and Nevada; and |
| Other, comprised of communities in Florida. |
In addition, the company announced last month that it will be entering the Houston, Texas housing market. This will be a start-up operation and we are expecting to deliver our first homes in Houston in 2014. It is anticipated that Houston will be included in our South West reporting segment.
In accordance with ASC 280, in determining the most appropriate aggregation of our homebuilding communities, we also considered similar economic and other characteristics, including product types, average selling prices, gross profits, production processes, suppliers, subcontractors, regulatory environments, land acquisition results, and underlying demand and supply.
Our Corporate segment primarily provides management services to our operating segments, and includes results of our captive insurance provider, which primarily administers claims reinsured by third-party carriers and the deductibles and retentions under those third party policies. Results of our insurance brokerage services business are also included in our Corporate segment.
Overview
Improvement in housing market conditions continued in the second quarter of 2013. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, net homes sales orders decreased 12% and 5%, respectively, primarily as a result of a lower number of active selling communities. However, net home orders per community increased 2% and 14%, respectively. Homes closed increased 50% and 40%, respectively, and homebuilding revenues increased 64% and 48%, respectively, primarily driven by the 98% higher backlog at the beginning of 2013 versus 2012. Gross margin as a percentage of revenues improved from 18.5% to 22.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012 and from 18.9% to 22.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012. We have $160.3 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and we expect to continue to invest in land opportunities in desirable locations to supplement our existing land positions.
30
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 217,310 | $ | 132,468 | 64 | % | $ | 352,270 | $ | 238,071 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
(168,884 | ) | (107,978 | ) | 56 | (272,308 | ) | (193,013 | ) | 41 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross margin |
48,426 | 24,490 | 98 | 79,962 | 45,058 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling expenses |
(12,848 | ) | (10,199 | ) | 26 | (23,002 | ) | (19,551 | ) | 18 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(14,078 | ) | (11,573 | ) | 22 | (26,035 | ) | (19,824 | ) | 31 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |
478 | 317 | 51 | (154 | ) | 384 | | |||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on reinsurance transaction |
(807 | ) | (8,163 | ) | (90 | ) | (159 | ) | (7,367 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,397 | ) | (5,909 | ) | (76 | ) | (4,830 | ) | (12,197 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other (expense) income, net |
237 | (235 | ) | | 1,007 | 1,275 | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
20,011 | (11,272 | ) | | 26,789 | (12,222 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(479 | ) | (848 | ) | (44 | ) | (420 | ) | (96 | ) | 338 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
19,532 | (12,120 | ) | | 26,369 | (12,318 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests |
2 | 19 | (89 | ) | 3 | (194 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to SHLP |
$ | 19,534 | $ | (12,101 | ) | | % | $ | 26,372 | $ | (12,512 | ) | | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
$ | 19,639 | $ | (12,761 | ) | | % | $ | 26,606 | $ | (11,516 | ) | | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, net income (loss) attributable to SHLP was $19.5 million compared to $(12.1) million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This increase in income was primarily attributable to an $23.9 million improvement in gross margins (from higher revenues and gross margin percentage), a $7.4 million decrease in the loss on our reinsurance transaction and a $4.5 million decrease in interest expense, partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses (from increased compensation expenses) and a $2.6 million increase in selling expenses (from increased new home closings).
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net income (loss) attributable to SHLP was $26.4 million compared to $(12.5) million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This increase in income was primarily attributable to an $34.9 million improvement in gross margins (from higher revenues and gross margin percentage), a $7.2 million decrease in the loss on our reinsurance transaction and a $7.4 million decrease in interest expense, partially offset by a $6.2 million increase in general and administrative expenses (from increased compensation expenses), and a $3.5 million increase in selling expenses.
Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations. We typically experience the highest home sales order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes three to eight months to construct a new home, we close more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home sales orders convert to home closings. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest from April to October, and the majority of cash receipts from home closings occur during the second half of the year. Therefore, operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Revenues
Revenues are derived primarily from home closings and land sales. House and land revenues are recorded at closing. Management fees from homebuilding ventures and projects are in other homebuilding revenues. Revenues generated from corporate, insurance brokerage services, and our captive insurance company, Partners Insurance Company (PIC), are in other revenues.
31
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 212,392 | $ | 127,108 | 67 | % | $ | 343,878 | $ | 228,016 | 51 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
4,213 | 4,738 | (11 | ) | 7,141 | 8,701 | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
369 | 372 | (1 | ) | 794 | 861 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
216,974 | 132,218 | 64 | 351,813 | 237,578 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
336 | 250 | 34 | 457 | 493 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 217,310 | $ | 132,468 | 64 | % | $ | 352,270 | $ | 238,071 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, total revenues were $217.3 million compared to $132.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to a 50% increase in homes closed and a 12% increase in the average selling price (ASP) of homes closed.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, total revenues were $352.3 million compared to $238.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to a 40% increase in homes closed and an 8% increase in the ASP of homes closed.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, homebuilding revenues by segment were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 56,128 | $ | 30,098 | 86 | % | $ | 94,101 | $ | 53,416 | 76 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
0 | 0 | 0 | 2,175 | 3,056 | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
6 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 12 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 56,134 | $ | 30,104 | 86 | % | $ | 96,289 | $ | 56,484 | 70 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
San Diego: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 31,355 | $ | 10,136 | 209 | % | $ | 40,983 | $ | 24,241 | 69 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
3 | 44 | (93 | ) | 5 | 46 | (89 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 31,358 | $ | 10,180 | 208 | % | $ | 40,988 | $ | 24,287 | 69 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Northern California: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 53,268 | $ | 30,240 | 76 | % | $ | 80,792 | $ | 56,065 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
215 | 198 | 9 | 340 | 331 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 53,483 | $ | 30,438 | 76 | % | $ | 81,132 | $ | 56,396 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Mountain West: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 35,671 | $ | 28,434 | 25 | % | $ | 57,041 | $ | 45,986 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
4,213 | 4,738 | (11 | ) | 4,966 | 5,645 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
0 | 39 | (100 | ) | 183 | 175 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 39,884 | $ | 33,211 | 20 | % | $ | 62,190 | $ | 51,806 | 20 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
South West: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 34,006 | $ | 26,615 | 28 | % | $ | 67,432 | $ | 45,918 | 47 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
145 | 85 | 71 | 252 | 297 | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 34,151 | $ | 26,700 | 28 | % | $ | 67,684 | $ | 46,215 | 46 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
House revenues |
$ | 1,964 | $ | 1,585 | 24 | % | $ | 3,530 | $ | 2,390 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
Land revenues |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other homebuilding revenues |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 1,964 | $ | 1,585 | 24 | % | $ | 3,530 | $ | 2,390 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, total homebuilding revenues were $217.0 million compared to $132.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to a 50% increase in homes closed and a 12% increase in the ASP of homes closed. The increase in home closings for the period was driven primarily by the 98% higher beginning of the year backlog at December 31, 2012 versus December 31, 2011. The increase in the ASP of homes closed was primarily attributable to the general increase in new home prices, net of a shift to lower priced homes in certain markets.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, total homebuilding revenues were $351.8 million compared to $237.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to a 40% increase in homes closed and a 8% increase in the ASP of homes closed. The increase in home closings for the period was driven primarily by the 98% higher beginning of the year backlog at December 31, 2012 versus December 31, 2011. The increase in the ASP of homes closed was primarily attributable to the general increase in new home prices, net of a shift to lower priced homes in certain markets.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, homes closed, by segment were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
Homes closed: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
80 | 64 | 25 | % | 131 | 111 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
San Diego |
68 | 19 | 258 | 91 | 46 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
116 | 58 | 100 | 177 | 115 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mountain West |
78 | 64 | 22 | 131 | 102 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
South West |
109 | 95 | 15 | 217 | 160 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
9 | 7 | 29 | 15 | 11 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total consolidated |
460 | 307 | 50 | 762 | 545 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
51 | 37 | 38 | 78 | 57 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total homes closed |
511 | 344 | 49 | % | 840 | 602 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the ASP of homes closed, by segment were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
ASP of homes closed: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
$ | 701,600 | $ | 470,281 | 49 | % | $ | 718,328 | $ | 481,225 | 49 | % | ||||||||||||
San Diego |
461,103 | 533,474 | (14 | ) | 450,341 | 526,978 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
459,207 | 521,379 | (12 | ) | 456,452 | 487,522 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mountain West |
457,321 | 444,281 | 3 | 435,427 | 450,843 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
South West |
311,982 | 280,158 | 11 | 310,747 | 286,988 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
218,222 | 226,429 | (4 | ) | 235,285 | 217,273 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total consolidated |
461,722 | 414,033 | 12 | 451,283 | 418,378 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
317,118 | 298,459 | 6 | 324,923 | 302,456 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total ASP of homes closed |
$ | 447,290 | $ | 401,602 | 11 | % | $ | 439,550 | $ | 407,402 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Gross Margin
Gross margin is revenues less cost of sales and is comprised of gross margins from our homebuilding and corporate segments.
Gross margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | Gross Margin % |
2012 | Gross Margin % |
2013 | Gross Margin % |
2012 | Gross Margin % |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 48,426 | 22.3 | % | $ | 24,490 | 18.5 | % | $ | 79,962 | 22.7 | % | $ | 45,058 | 18.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, total gross margin was $48.4 million compared to $24.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to increased homes closed and higher margins resulting from general price increases experienced in all of our segments, partially offset by higher labor and material costs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, total gross margin was $80.0 million compared to $45.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to increased homes closed and higher margins resulting from general price increases experienced in all of our segments, partially offset by higher labor and material costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total homebuilding revenues |
$ | 216,974 | $ | 132,218 | 64 | % | $ | 351,813 | $ | 237,578 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
Selling expense |
$ | 12,848 | $ | 10,199 | 26 | % | $ | 23,002 | $ | 19,551 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
% of total homebuilding revenues |
5.9 | % | 7.7 | % | 180 bps | 6.5 | % | 8.2 | % | 170 bps | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
$ | 14,078 | $ | 11,573 | 22 | % | $ | 26,035 | $ | 19,824 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
% of total homebuilding revenues |
6.5 | % | 8.8 | % | 230 bps | 7.4 | % | 8.3 | % | 90 bps | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total selling, general and administrative expense |
$ | 26,926 | $ | 21,772 | 24 | % | $ | 49,037 | $ | 39,375 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
% of total homebuilding revenues |
12.4 | % | 16.5 | % | 410 bps | 13.9 | % | 16.6 | % | 270 bps | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, selling expense was $12.8 million compared to $10.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, but decreased as a percentage of revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, selling expense was $23.0 million compared to $19.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, but also decreased as a percentage of revenues. As homebuilding revenues increase, we are generally able to achieve economies of scale and efficiencies on certain expenses that are more fixed in nature.
General and Administrative Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expense was $14.1 million compared to $11.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to increased compensation expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expense was $26.0 million compared to $19.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was also primarily due to increased compensation expenses. However, G&A expenses as a percentage of revenue were lower for both the three month and six month periods in 2013, compared to 2012, as a result of greater operating efficiencies from the increased level of revenues.
34
Equity in Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures represents our share of income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for under the equity method. These joint ventures are generally involved in real property development.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, equity in income (loss) from joint ventures was $0.5 million compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, equity in income (loss) from joint ventures was $(0.2) million compared to $.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, there were no significant earnings or losses from any unconsolidated joint venture.
Gain (Loss) on Reinsurance Transaction
Completed operations claims were previously insured through PIC for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2007. In December 2009, PIC entered into a series of transactions (the PIC Transaction) in which these policies were either novated to JFSCI or reinsured with third-party insurance carriers. As a result of the PIC Transaction, a $34.8 million gain was generated but deferred and to be recognized as income when related claims are paid. In addition, the deferred gain can be increased or decreased based on changes in actuarial estimates. Any changes to the deferred gain will be recognized as a current period gain or charge.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, a $0.8 million and $8.2 million loss was recognized due to adjustments to actuarial estimates. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, a $0.2 million and $7.4 million loss was recognized also due to adjustments to actuarial estimates.
Interest Expense
Interest expense represents interest incurred and not capitalized. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, most interest incurred was capitalized to inventory with the remainder expensed as a result of debt exceeding the qualified asset amounts. Assets qualify for interest capitalization during their development and other qualifying activities such as construction; however, if qualified assets are less than the total amount of debt, then interest is expensed relative to the shortfall.
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, interest expense was $1.4 million compared to $5.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, interest expense was $4.8 million compared to $12.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to a higher level of qualified assets.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net is comprised of interest income, gains (losses) on sales of investments, pre-acquisition cost and deposit write-offs, property tax expense and other income (expense). Interest income is primarily from related party notes receivables, investments and interest bearing cash accounts.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, other (expense) income, net was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 557 | $ | 1,227 | (55 | )% | $ | 1,177 | $ | 2,546 | (54 | )% | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investments |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 23 | (57 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(320 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (78 | ) | (180 | ) | (1,294 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other (expense) income, net |
$ | 237 | $ | (235 | ) | | % | $ | 1,007 | $ | 1,275 | (21 | )% | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, other (expense) income, net was $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, compared to $(0.2) million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to decreased interest income on the Companys bank and investment accounts.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
SHLP is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. As a limited partnership, SHLP is subject to certain minimal state taxes and fees; however, taxes on income realized by SHLP are generally the obligation of SHLPs general and limited partners and their owners. SHI and its subsidiaries are C corporations, and therefore, federal and state income taxes for these entities are included in the consolidated financial statements.
35
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, net deferred tax assets of SHI before reserves were $31.5 million and $32.7 million, respectively, which primarily related to available loss carryforwards, inventory and investment impairments, and housing and land inventory basis differences. The $31.5 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance fully reserves the net deferred tax asset due to the inherent uncertainty of future income as the housing recovery is in its early stages. We will continue to monitor industry and economic conditions, and our ability to generate taxable income based on our business plan and available tax planning strategies, which would allow us to utilize the tax benefits of the net deferred tax assets and thereby allow us to reverse all, or a portion of, our valuation allowance.
Net (Income) Expense Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Joint ventures are consolidated when we have a controlling interest or, absent a controlling interest, when we can substantially influence its business. Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests represents the share of loss (income) attributable to the parties having a non-controlling interest. The net (income) expense attributable to non-controlling interests was not material for the periods presented.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) plus other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to unrealized gains (losses) from investments, net of reclassification adjustments for realized gains (losses) and tax benefit (expense).
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 19,532 | $ | (12,120 | ) | | % | $ | 26,369 | $ | (12,318 | ) | | % | ||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net |
107 | (641 | ) | | 237 | 802 | (70 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss), net |
$ | 19,639 | $ | (12,761 | ) | | % | $ | 26,606 | $ | (11,516 | ) | | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED HOMEBUILDING OPERATIONAL DATA
Homes Sales Orders and Active Selling Communities
Home sales orders are contracts executed with homebuyers to purchase homes and are stated net of cancellations. Except where market conditions or other factors justify increasing available unsold home inventory, construction of a home typically begins when a sales contract for that home is executed and other conditions are satisfied, such as financing approval. Therefore, recognition of a home sales order usually represents the beginning of the homes construction cycle. Homebuilding construction expenditures and, ultimately, homebuilding revenues and cash flow, are therefore dependent on the timing and magnitude of home sales orders.
An active selling community represents a new home community that advertises, markets and sells homes through a sales office located at a model complex in the community. Sales offices in communities near the end of their sales cycle are not designated as an active selling community. An active selling community is a designation similar to a store or sales outlet and is used to measure home sales order results on a per active selling community basis. Presentation of home sales orders per active selling community is a means of assessing sales growth or reductions across communities through a common analytical measurement. The average number of active selling communities for a particular period represents the aggregate number of active selling communities in operation at the end of each month in such period divided by the number of months in such period.
36
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, home sales orders, net of cancellations, were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
Home sales orders, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
50 | 88 | (43 | )% | 104 | 158 | (34 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
San Diego |
74 | 57 | 30 | 165 | 110 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
101 | 115 | (12 | ) | 221 | 236 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mountain West |
122 | 121 | 1 | 234 | 210 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
South West |
163 | 194 | (16 | ) | 303 | 348 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
4 | 12 | (67 | ) | 6 | 24 | (75 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total consolidated |
514 | 587 | (12 | )% | 1,033 | 1,086 | (5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
65 | 63 | 3 | 111 | 106 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total home sales orders, net |
579 | 650 | (11 | )% | 1,144 | 1,192 | (4 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, cancellation rates were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Cancellation rates: |
||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
7 | % | 11 | % | 10 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||
San Diego |
16 | 29 | 18 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Northern California |
11 | 14 | 10 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Mountain West |
12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||||
South West |
10 | 10 | 13 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Other |
20 | 14 | 25 | 17 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total consolidated |
12 | % | 14 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
22 | 11 | 21 | 12 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cancellation rates |
13 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, active selling communities were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
2013 | 2012 | % Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
Average number of active selling communities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
5 | 7 | (29 | )% | 5 | 8 | (38 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
San Diego |
6 | 9 | (33 | ) | 7 | 10 | (30 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
13 | 15 | (13 | ) | 13 | 16 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mountain West |
15 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
South West |
14 | 16 | (13 | ) | 15 | 17 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | 3 | (67 | ) | 1 | 3 | (67 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total consolidated |
54 | 63 | (14 | ) | 56 | 67 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
13 | 10 | 30 | 12 | 11 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total average number of active selling communities |
67 | 73 | (8 | )% | 68 | 78 | (13 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, consolidated home sales orders per active selling community were 9.5, or 3.2 per month, compared to 9.3, or 3.1 per month, for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2013 reflects the improved market conditions in each segment compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. The improvement in housing demand for the three months ended June 30, 2013 is also reflected in our lower cancellation rates and higher traffic.
37
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, consolidated home sales orders per active selling community were 18.4, or 3.1 per month, compared to 16.2, or 2.7 per month, for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2013 reflects the improved market conditions in each segment compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The improvement in housing demand for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is also reflected in our lower cancellation rates and higher traffic.
Sales Order Backlog
Sales order backlog represents homes sold and under contract to be built, but not closed. Backlog sales value is the revenue estimated to be realized at closing. A home is sold when a sales contract is signed by the seller and buyer, and upon receipt of a prerequisite deposit. A home is closed when all conditions of escrow are met, including delivery of the home, title passage, and appropriate consideration is received or collection of associated receivables, if any, is reasonably assured. A sold home is classified in backlog during the time between its sale and close. During that time, construction costs are generally incurred to complete the home except where market conditions or other factors justify increasing available unsold home inventory. Backlog is therefore an important performance measurement in analysis of cash outflows and inflows. However, because sales order contracts are cancelled by the buyer at times, not all homes in backlog will result in closings.
The overall increase in the number of homes in backlog at June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012, is primarily due to the 98% higher backlog at the beginning of 2013 versus the beginning of 2012.
At June 30, 2013 and 2012, sales order backlog was as follows:
Homes | Sales Value | ASP | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Backlog: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
96 | 106 | $ | 84,130 | $ | 58,862 | $ | 876 | $ | 555 | ||||||||||||||
San Diego |
181 | 103 | 87,566 | 41,266 | 484 | 401 | ||||||||||||||||||
Northern California |
285 | 226 | 152,498 | 104,810 | 535 | 464 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mountain West |
315 | 203 | 144,441 | 89,167 | 459 | 439 | ||||||||||||||||||
South West |
298 | 340 | 93,290 | 92,717 | 313 | 273 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
7 | 24 | 2,327 | 5,641 | 332 | 235 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total consolidated |
1,182 | 1,002 | 564,252 | 392,463 | 477 | 392 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
117 | 83 | 37,958 | 26,947 | 324 | 325 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total backlog |
1,299 | 1,085 | $ | 602,210 | $ | 419,410 | $ | 464 | $ | 387 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and Homes in Inventory
Inventory is comprised of housing projects under development, land under development, land held for future development, land held for sale, deposits and pre-acquisition costs. As land is acquired and developed, and homes are constructed, the underlying costs are capitalized to inventory. As homes and land transactions close, these costs are relieved from inventory and charged to cost of sales.
As land is acquired and developed, each parcel is assigned a lot count. For parcels of land, an estimated number of lots are added to inventory once entitlement occurs. Occasionally, when the intended use of a parcel changes, lot counts are adjusted. As homes and land are sold, lot counts are reduced. Lots are categorized as (i) owned, (ii) controlled (which includes a contractual right to purchase) or (iii) owned or controlled through unconsolidated joint ventures. The status of each lot is identified by land held for development, land under development, land held for sale, lots available for construction, homes under construction, completed homes and models. Homes under construction and completed homes are also classified as sold or unsold.
38
At June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, total lots owned or controlled were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
% Change from December 31, 2012 |
June 30, 2012 |
% Change from June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Lots owned or controlled by segment: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
2,030 | 1,989 | 2 | % | 1,133 | 79 | % | |||||||||||||
San Diego |
699 | 764 | (9 | ) | 713 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Northern California |
3,099 | 3,182 | (3 | ) | 3,963 | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||
Mountain West |
10,180 | 10,074 | 1 | 9,900 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
South West |
3,284 | 1,876 | 75 | 1,819 | 81 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
10 | 25 | (60 | ) | 45 | (78 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total consolidated |
19,302 | 17,910 | 8 | 17,573 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
3,745 | 3,874 | (3 | ) | 1,919 | 95 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total lots owned or controlled |
23,047 | 21,784 | 6 | % | 19,492 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Lots owned or controlled by ownership type: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Lots owned for homebuilding |
6,413 | 6,448 | (1 | )% | 6,247 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||
Lots owned and held for sale |
3,269 | 3,382 | (3 | ) | 3,506 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Lots optioned or subject to contract for homebuilding |
6,586 | 5,046 | 31 | 4,786 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Lots optioned or subject to contract that will be held for sale |
3,034 | 3,034 | 0 | 3,034 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint venture lots |
3,745 | 3,874 | (3 | ) | 1,919 | 95 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total lots owned or controlled |
23,047 | 21,784 | 6 | % | 19,492 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, total homes under construction and completed homes were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
% Change from December 31, 2012 |
June 30, 2012 |
% Change from June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Homes under construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sold |
833 | 630 | 32 | % | 657 | 27 | % | |||||||||||||
Unsold |
134 | 133 | 1 | 139 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total consolidated |
967 | 763 | 27 | 796 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
65 | 64 | 2 | 79 | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total homes under construction |
1,032 | 827 | 25 | % | 875 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Completed homes:(a) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sold(b) |
60 | 41 | 46 | % | 38 | 58 | % | |||||||||||||
Unsold |
16 | 22 | (27 | ) | 24 | (33 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total consolidated |
76 | 63 | 21 | 62 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures |
16 | 9 | 78 | 8 | 100 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total completed homes |
92 | 72 | 28 | % | 70 | 31 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Excludes model homes. |
(b) | Sold but not closed. |
39
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating and other short-term cash liquidity needs have been primarily funded from cash on our balance sheet and our homebuilding operations primarily through home closings and land sales, net of the underlying expenditures to fund these operations. In addition, the Company has, and will continue to utilize, land option contracts, public and private note offerings, land seller notes, joint venture structures (which typically obtain project level financing to reduce the amount of partner capital invested), assessment district bond financing, letters of credit and surety bonds, tax refunds and proceeds from related party note receivables as sources of liquidity. At present, we do not have a revolving credit facility to fund short-term cash liquidity needs. At June 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents were $158.0 million, restricted cash was $2.3 million and total debt was $759.7 million, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $279.8 million, restricted cash of $13.0 million and total debt of $758.2 million at December 31, 2012. Restricted cash includes customer deposits temporarily restricted in accordance with regulatory requirements and cash used in lieu of bonds.
Based on our financial condition, we believe existing cash, cash equivalents, cash from operations and the other sources available to us will likely be sufficient to provide for our cash requirements in the next twelve months. However, at some point over the next twelve month period, it is likely we will need additional sources of capital to fund our growth objectives, otherwise we would have to make adjustments to our land acquisition and development expenditures. Those sources, if available, could be from a secured or unsecured credit facility, new secured or unsecured notes or a combination of these. In evaluating this sufficiency for the next twelve months, we considered the expected cash flow to be generated by homebuilding operations, our current cash position and other sources of liquidity available to us, compared to anticipated cash requirements for interest payments on the Secured Notes due May 2019 (the Secured Notes), land purchase commitments and land development expenditures, joint venture funding requirements and other cash operating expenses. We also continually monitor current and expected operational requirements to evaluate and determine the use and amount of our cash needs which includes, but is not limited to, the following disciplines:
| Strategic land acquisitions that meet our investment and marketing standards, including, in most cases, the quick turn of assets; |
| Strict control and limitation of unsold home inventory and avoidance of excessive and untimely uses of cash; |
| Pre-qualification of homebuyers, timely commencement of home construction thereon and mitigation of cancellations and creation of unsold inventory; |
| Reduced construction cycle times, prompt closings of homes and improved cash flow thereon; and |
| Maintenance of sufficient cash or other sources of liquidity that, depending on market conditions, will be available to acquire land and increase our active selling communities. |
The availability of additional capital, whether from private capital sources (including banks) or the public capital markets, fluctuates as market conditions change. There may be times when the private capital markets and the public debt markets lack sufficient liquidity or when our securities cannot be sold at attractive prices, in which case we would be unable to access capital from these sources. A weakening of our financial condition, including a material increase in our leverage or decrease in our profitability or cash flows, could adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary funds, result in a credit rating downgrade or change in outlook, or otherwise increase our cost of borrowing.
In 2009, we filed a petition with the United States Tax Court (the Tax Court) regarding our use of the completed contract method (CCM) of accounting for our homebuilding operations. During 2010 and 2011, we engaged in formal and informal discovery with the IRS and the Tax Court heard trial testimony in July 2012 and ordered the Company and the IRS to exchange briefs, all of which have been filed. We expect the Tax Court to render its decision sometime during 2013 or 2014. Resolution of this matter, either through settlement or adjudication, may require payments (a) from SHI to the IRS and the applicable state taxing authorities for its income tax liability and interest and (b) from SHLP to its partners pursuant to the Tax Distribution Agreement for their liability attributable to SHLPs income taxes and interest. We expect our position will prevail, but for adjudication contrary to our position, which is reasonably possible, the total amount of the SHIs payment to the IRS and applicable state taxing authorities could be up to $64 million and the required distributions to SHLPs partners pursuant to the Tax Distribution Agreement could be up to $107 million.
Notwithstanding, the Indenture governing the Secured Notes (the Indenture) restricts SHLPs ability to make distributions to its partners pursuant to the Tax Distribution Agreement in excess of an amount specified by the Indenture (such maximum amount of collective distributions referred to as the Maximum CCM Payment), unless SHLP receives a cash equity contribution from JFSCI for such excess. The initial Maximum CCM Payment is $70.0 million, which amount will be reduced by payments made by SHI in connection with any resolution of our dispute with the IRS regarding our use of CCM and payments made by SHLP on certain guarantee obligations described in the Indenture. Payments of CCM-related tax liabilities by SHLP pursuant to the Tax Distribution Agreement or by SHI will not impact our Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined below) or our ability to incur additional indebtedness under the terms of the Indenture.
If necessary, SHLP and SHI expect to pay any CCM-related tax liability from existing cash, cash from operations and, to the extent SHLP is required by the Tax Distribution Agreement to pay amounts in excess of the Maximum CCM Payment, from cash equity
40
contributions by JFSCI. However, cash from homebuilding operations may be insufficient to cover such payments. See Risk FactorsThe IRS has disallowed certain income recognition methodologies. If we are unsuccessful in appealing this decision, we could become subject to a substantial tax liability from previous years and Risk FactorsUnder our Tax Distribution Agreement, we are required to make distributions to our equity holders from time to time based on their ownership in SHLP, which is a limited partnership and, under certain circumstances, those distributions may occur even if SHLP does not have taxable income in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
We are unable to extend our evaluation of the sufficiency of our liquidity beyond twelve months, and we cannot assure in the future our homebuilding operations will generate sufficient cash flow to enable us to grow our business, service our indebtedness, make payments toward land purchase commitments, or fund our joint ventures. For more information, see Risk FactorsOur ability to generate sufficient cash or access other limited sources of liquidity to operate our business and service our debt depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and Risk FactorsWe have a significant number of contingent liabilities, and if any are satisfied by us, could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and results of operations in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The Indenture governing the Secured Notes provides that we and our restricted subsidiaries may not incur or guarantee the payment of any indebtedness (other than certain specified types of permitted indebtedness) unless, immediately after giving effect to such incurrence or guarantee and the application of the proceeds therefrom, the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Indenture) would be at least 2.0 to 1.0. Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is defined in the Indenture as the ratio of (i) our Consolidated Cash Flow Available for Fixed Charges (as defined in the Indenture) for the prior four full fiscal quarters, to (ii) our aggregate Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the Indenture) for such prior four full fiscal quarters, in each case giving pro forma effect to certain transactions as specified in the Indenture. At June 30, 2013, our Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, determined as specified in the Indenture, was 1.80. The increase in the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio from 1.44 at March 31, 2013 was due to the increasing income of the Company and the change in the preferred rates on unreturned capital balances for the Series B and Series D preferred equity holders, which was effective retroactive to January 1, 2013.
The following table presents cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | (108,166 | ) | $ | (33,704 | ) | ||
Investing activities |
(12,841 | ) | 6,095 | |||||
Financing activities |
(752 | ) | 180 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
$ | (121,759 | ) | $ | (27,429 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
Cash from Operating Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $(108.2) million compared to $(33.7) million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.This decrease was primarily attributed to increased land acquisitions, land development and construction costs totaling $(200.6) million, which were partially offset by cash receipts from increased home sales of $115.9 million, the release of $10.0 million in restricted cash and an $8.6 million increase in payables and other liabilities.
Cash from Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $(12.8) million compared to $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to increased investments in unconsolidated land development and homebuilding joint ventures formed in December 2012, and lower proceeds from the maturity and sale of available-for-sale investments.
Cash from Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $(0.8) million compared to $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to reduced contributions from non-controlling interests, net of distributions, partially offset by reduced principal payments to financial institutions and others.
41
Notes Payable
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, notes payable were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Notes payable: |
||||||||
$750.0 million 8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 |
$ | 750,000 | $ | 750,000 | ||||
Other secured promissory notes |
9,740 | 8,209 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total notes payable |
$ | 759,740 | $ | 758,209 | ||||
|
|
|
|
On May 10, 2011, we issued $750.0 million of secured notes, which bear interest at 8.625% paid semi-annually on May 15 and November 15, and do not require principal payments until maturity on May 15, 2019. The Secured Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the Companys option beginning on May 15, 2015 at a price of 104.313 per bond, reducing to 102.156 on May 15, 2016 and are redeemable at par beginning on May 15, 2017. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accrued interest was $8.1 million and $8.1 million, respectively.
The Indenture governing the Secured Notes contains covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness (including the issuance of certain preferred stock), pay dividends and distributions on our equity interests, repurchase our equity interests, retire unsecured or subordinated notes more than one year prior to their maturity, make investments in subsidiaries and joint ventures that are not restricted subsidiaries that guarantee the Secured Notes, sell certain assets, incur liens, merge with or into other companies, expand into unrelated businesses, and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with these covenants.
The Indenture governing the Secured Notes provides that we and our restricted subsidiaries may not incur or guarantee the payment of any indebtedness (other than certain specified types of permitted indebtedness) unless, immediately after giving effect to such incurrence or guarantee and the application of the proceeds therefrom, the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Indenture would be at least 2.0 to 1.0. Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is defined in the Indenture as the ratio of (i) our Consolidated Cash Flow Available for Fixed Charges (as defined in the Indenture) for the prior four full fiscal quarters, to (ii) our aggregate Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined in the Indenture) for such prior four full fiscal quarters, in each case giving pro forma effect to certain transactions as specified in the Indenture. At June 30, 2013, our Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, determined as specified in the Indenture, was 1.80.
In addition, our ability to make joint venture and other restricted payments and investments is governed by the Indenture. We are permitted to make otherwise restricted payments under (i) a $70.0 million revolving basket available solely for joint venture investments and (ii) a broader restricted payment basket available as long as our Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Indenture) is at least 2.0 to 1.0. The aggregate amount of the restricted payments made under this broader restricted payment basket cannot exceed 50% of our cumulative Consolidated Net Income (as defined in the Indenture), generated subsequent to the issuance of the Secured Notes plus the aggregate net cash proceeds of, and the fair market value of, any property or other asset received by the Company as a capital contribution or upon the issuance of indebtedness or certain securities by the Company since the issuance of the Secured Notes, plus, to the extent not included in Consolidated Net Income, certain amounts received in connection with dispositions, distributions or repayments of restricted investments, plus the value of any unrestricted subsidiary which is redesignated as a restricted subsidiary under the Indenture. We have a number of joint ventures which have used, and are expected to use, capacity under these restricted payment baskets. During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into a joint venture in Southern California and committed to contribute up to $45.0 million of capital. At June 30, 2013 we made aggregate capital contributions of $9.5 million to this joint venture. We project that our peak investment of $45.0 million in this joint venture will occur in the fourth quarter of 2014 and, shortly thereafter, will be returned to the Company. We anticipate making additional investments in this joint venture in 2015 at amounts well below the $45.0 million commitment, and we expect such additional investments will be returned to us by the end of 2015.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Contractual Obligations
Primary contractual obligations are payments under notes payable, operating leases and purchase obligations. Purchase obligations primarily represent land purchase and option contracts, and purchase obligations for water system connection rights. At June 30, 2013, there were no material changes to contractual obligations from those reported in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
42
Land Purchase and Option Contracts
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land purchase and option contracts to procure land for construction of homes. These contracts typically require a cash deposit and the purchase is often contingent on satisfaction of certain requirements by land sellers, including securing property and development entitlements. We utilize option contracts as a method of acquiring large tracts of land in smaller parcels to better manage financial and market risk of holding land and to reduce use of funds. Option contracts generally require a non-refundable deposit after a diligence period for the right to acquire lots over a specified period of time at a predetermined price. However, in certain circumstances, the purchase price may not, in whole or in part, be determinable and payable until the homes or lots are sold. In such instances, an estimated purchase price for the unknown portion is not included in the total remaining purchase price. At June 30, 2013, we had owned or controlled 7,236 lots in Colorado for which the entire purchase price is determined at the time the underlying lots is sold to a home buyer or other purchaser of the lot. At our discretion, we generally have rights to terminate our obligations under purchase and option contracts by forfeiting our cash deposit or repaying amounts drawn under our letters of credit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller. However, purchase contracts can contain additional development obligations that must be completed even if a contract is terminated.
Use of option contracts is dependent on the willingness of land sellers, availability of capital, housing market conditions and geographic preferences. Options may be more difficult to obtain from land sellers in stronger housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions.
At June 30, 2013, we had $6.8 million in option contract deposits on land with a total remaining purchase price, excluding land subject to option contracts that do not specify a purchase price, of $355.4 million, compared to $5.3 million and $200.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012.
Water System Connection Rights
At one of our consolidated homebuilding projects, we have a contractual obligation to purchase and receive water system connection rights which, at June 30, 2013, had an estimated market value in excess of their contractual purchase price of $33.6 million. These water system connection rights are held and then transferred to homebuyers upon closing of their home or transferred upon the sale of land to the respective buyer. These water system connection rights can also be sold or leased but generally only within the local jurisdiction.
Land Development and Homebuilding Joint Ventures
We enter into land development and homebuilding joint ventures for the following purposes:
| leveraging our capital base; |
| managing and reducing financial and market risks of holding land; |
| establishing strategic alliances; |
| accessing lot positions; and |
| expanding market share. |
These joint ventures typically obtain secured acquisition, development and construction financing, each designed to reduce use of our capital.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, total unconsolidated joint ventures notes payable were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Bank and seller notes payable: |
||||||||
Guaranteed (subject to remargin obligations) |
$ | 49,453 | $ | 45,610 | ||||
Non-Guaranteed |
10,936 | 22,894 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total bank and seller notes payable (a) |
60,389 | 68,504 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Partner notes payable: |
||||||||
Unsecured (b) |
5,296 | 5,296 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total unconsolidated joint venture notes payable |
$ | 65,685 | $ | 73,800 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other unconsolidated joint venture notes payable (c) |
$ | 43,002 | $ | 57,839 | ||||
|
|
|
|
43
(a) | All bank seller notes were secured by real property. |
(b) | No guarantees were provided on partner notes payable. |
(c) | We have an indirect effective ownership in two joint ventures of 12.3% and .0003%, respectively, that had bank notes payable secured by real property, which we have not guaranteed. |
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, remargin obligations and guarantees provided on the debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures were on a joint and/or several basis and include, but are not limited to, project completion, interest and carry, and loan-to-value maintenance guarantees. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had an indemnification agreement from our joint venture partner for 90% of one secured loan balance, which was zero and zero, respectively. However, we cannot provide assurance we could collect under this indemnity agreement. In addition, for another joint venture, we have a remargin obligation that is limited to the lesser of 50% of the outstanding balances or $35.0 million in total for the joint venture loans, which outstanding loan balances were $49.4 million and $45.6 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Consequently, our maximum remargin obligation was $24.7 million and $22.8 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. We also have an indemnification agreement from our joint venture partner under which we could potentially recover a portion of any remargin payments made to the bank. However, we cannot provide assurance we could collect under this indemnity agreement. No liabilities were recorded for these guarantees at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as the fair value of the secured real estate assets exceeded the outstanding notes payable.
We may be required to use funds for obligations of these unconsolidated joint ventures, such as:
| loans (including to replace expiring loans, to satisfy loan re-margin and land development and construction completion obligations or to satisfy environmental indemnity obligations); |
| development and construction costs; |
| indemnity obligations to surety providers; |
| land purchase obligations; and |
| dissolutions (including satisfaction of joint venture indebtedness through repayment or assumption of such indebtedness, payments to partners in connection with the dissolution, or payment of the remaining costs to complete, including warranty and legal obligations). |
Guarantees, Surety Obligations and Other Contingencies
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, certain unrecorded loan remargin or other guarantees, surety obligations and other contingencies were as follows:
June 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Tax Court CCM case (capped at $70.0 million) |
$ | 70,000 | $ | 70,000 | ||||
Remargin obligations and guarantees for unconsolidated joint ventures |
24,726 | 22,805 | ||||||
Outstanding letters of credit |
457 | 4,216 | ||||||
Costs to complete on surety bonds for Company projects |
94,672 | 85,490 | ||||||
Costs to complete on surety bonds for joint venture projects |
27,659 | 30,804 | ||||||
Costs to complete on surety bonds for related party projects |
2,274 | 2,311 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total unrecorded contingent liabilities and commitments |
$ | 219,788 | $ | 215,626 | ||||
|
|
|
|
On May 10, 2011, we entered into a $75.0 million letter of credit facility. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, outstanding letters of credit against the letter of credit facility were $0.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
We provide surety bonds that guarantee completion of certain infrastructure serving our homebuilding projects. At June 30, 2013, there were $94.7 million of costs to complete in connection with the $182.5 million of surety bonds that were issued. At December 31, 2012, there were $85.5 million of costs to complete in connection with the $186.0 million of surety bonds that were issued.
We also provided indemnification for bonds issued by certain unconsolidated joint ventures and other related party projects in which we have no ownership interest. At June 30, 2013, there were $27.7 million of costs to complete in connection with $64.5 million of surety bonds that were issued for unconsolidated joint venture projects, and a $2.3 million of costs to complete in connection with $5.8 million of surety bonds that were issued for related party projects. At December 31, 2012, there were $30.8 million of costs to complete in connection with $71.6 million of surety bonds that were issued for unconsolidated joint venture projects, and $2.3 million of costs to complete in connection with $6.1 million of surety bonds that were issued for related party projects.
44
Certain of our homebuilding projects utilize community facility district, metro-district and other local government bond financing programs to fund acquisition or construction of infrastructure improvements. Interest and principal on these bonds are typically paid from taxes and assessments levied on homeowners following the sale of new homes within the project. Occasionally, we enter into credit support arrangements requiring us to pay interest and principal on these bonds if the taxes and assessments levied on homeowners are insufficient to cover such obligations. Furthermore, reimbursement of these payments to us is dependent on the district or local governments ability to generate sufficient tax and assessment revenues from the sale of new homes. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, in connection with a credit support arrangement, there was $6.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively, reimbursable to us from a metro-district in Colorado.
We also pay certain fees and costs associated with the construction of infrastructure improvements in homebuilding projects that utilize these district bond financing programs. These fees and costs are typically reimbursable to us from, and therefore dependent on, bond proceeds or taxes and assessments levied on homeowners. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, in connection with certain funding arrangements, there was $12.7 million and $16.3 million, respectively, reimbursable to us from certain metro-districts, including $11.4 million and $11.9 million, respectively, from a metro-district in Colorado.
Until bond proceeds or tax and assessment revenues are sufficient to cover our obligations and/or reimburse us, our responsibility to make interest and principal payments on these bonds or pay fees and costs associated with the construction of infrastructure improvements could be prolonged and significant.
In December 2011, Vistancia, LLC, a consolidated joint venture, sold its remaining interest in an unconsolidated joint venture (the Vistancia Sale). As a condition of the Vistancia Sale, and the purchase of the non-controlling members remaining interest in Vistancia, LLC, the Company effectively remains a 10% guarantor on certain community facility district bond obligations to which the Company must meet a minimum calculated tangible net worth; otherwise, the Company is required to fund collateral to the bond issuer. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company exceeded the minimum tangible net worth requirement.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In March 2012, SHLPs entire 58% interest in Shea Colorado, LLC (SCLLC), a consolidated joint venture with Shea Properties II, LLC, a related party and the non-controlling member, was redeemed by SCLLC. In valuing its 58% interest in SCLLC, and to ensure receipt of net assets of equal value to its ownership interest, SHLP used third-party real estate appraisals. The estimated fair value of the assets received by SHLP was $30.8 million. However, as the non-controlling member is a related party under common control, the assets and liabilities received by SHLP were recorded at net book value and the difference in SHLPs investment in SCLLC and the net book value of the assets and liabilities received was recorded as a reduction to SHLPs equity.
As consideration for the redemption, SCLLC distributed assets and liabilities to SHLP having a net book value of $24.0 million, including $2.2 million cash, a $3.0 million secured note receivable, $20.0 million of inventory and $1.2 million of other liabilities. As a result of this redemption, SCLLC is no longer included in these consolidated financial statements effective March 31, 2012. This transaction resulted in a net reduction of $41.8 million in assets and $2.0 million in liabilities, and a $39.8 million reduction in total equity, of which $11.6 million was attributable to SHLP and $28.2 million was attributable to non-controlling interests.
JFSCI provides corporate services to us, including management, legal, tax, information technology, risk management, facilities, accounting, treasury and human resources. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expenses included $5.9 million and $11.1 million, respectively, for corporate services provided by JFSCI. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses included $4.5 million and $8.4 million, respectively, for corporate services provided by JFSCI.
We obtain workers compensation insurance, commercial general liability insurance and insurance for completed operations losses and damages with respect to our homebuilding operations from affiliate and unrelated third party insurance providers. These policies are purchased by affiliate entities and we pay premiums to these affiliates for the coverages provided by these third party insurance providers. Policies covering these risks are written at various coverage levels but include a large self-insured retention or deductible. We have retention liability insurance from affiliated entities to insure these large retentions or deductibles. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, amounts paid to affiliates for this retention insurance coverage were $3.9 million and $7.8 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, amounts paid to affiliates for this retention insurance coverage were $3.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
45
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We believe no significant changes occurred to our critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to those disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for December 31, 2012 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to market risk primarily from interest rate fluctuations. Historically, we have incurred fixed-rate and variable- rate debt. For fixed-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value of the debt instrument, but not earnings or cash flow. Conversely, for variable-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not affect the fair market value of the debt but do affect earnings and cash flow. We did not utilize swaps, forward or option contracts on interest rates or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments at or during the six months ended June 30, 2013. We have not entered into and currently do not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. As we do not have an obligation to prepay fixed-rate debt prior to maturity, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on such debt until we refinance.
We believe no significant changes to our market risks occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to those disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures at June 30, 2013. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures at June 30, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, at such date, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We made no change in internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter of 2013 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Controls
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all of our control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
46
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, contain forward-looking statements and information relating to us that are based on beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, us. When used in this document, words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan and project and similar expressions, as they relate to us are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties difficult to predict. Further, certain forward- looking statements are based upon assumptions of future events that may not prove to be accurate.
See the Risk Factors section included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a description of risk factors that could significantly affect our financial results. In addition, the following factors could cause actual results to differ materially from results that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things:
| changes in employment levels; |
| changes in availability of financing for homebuyers; |
| changes in interest rates; |
| changes in consumer confidence; |
| changes in levels of new and existing homes for sale; |
| changes in demographic trends; |
| changes in housing demands; |
| changes in home prices; |
| elimination or reduction of tax benefits associated with owning a home; |
| litigation risks associated with home warranty and construction defect and other claims; and |
| various other factors, both referenced and not referenced in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
Many of these factors are macroeconomic in nature and are, therefore, beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from those described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, planned or projected. Except as required by law, we neither intend nor assume any obligation to revise or update these forward- looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.
47
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been and will likely be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, employment practices and environmental protection. As a result, we are subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations.
We record a reserve for potential legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue for these matters based on facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revise these estimates when necessary. In such cases, there may exist an exposure to loss in excess of amounts accrued. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal claims and related contingencies, we generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. While their outcome cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe we have appropriately reserved for these claims or matters. Other than the CCM matter described in Liquidity and Capital Resources and in Notes 13 and 15 to our consolidated financial statements, we do not believe we are subject to any material legal claims and regulatory matters at this time. However, if liabilities arising from their ultimate resolution of legal claims or regulatory matters exceeds their recorded reserves, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
On August 6, 2013, the Shea Homes Limited Partnership Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement (Agreement) was amended to change the interest rates on the Class B and Class D preferred returns, effective January 1, 2013. The Class B preferred return changed from Prime minus 2.05%, to 1.2% from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016, 2.25% from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020, and Prime less 2.05% from January 1, 2021 and thereafter on unreturned capital balances. The Class D preferred return changed from 7.0% to 2.0% from January 1, 2013 to December 31 2016, 12.75% from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020, and 7.0% from January 1, 2021 and thereafter on unreturned capital balances
48
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
3.1 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Shea Homes Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC on October 14, 2011 (File No. 333-177328)) | |
3.2 | First Amendment to Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Shea Homes Limited Partnership | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 | The following materials from Shea Homes Limited Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2013, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (v) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed furnished and not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
49
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Dated: August 9, 2013 | By: | /s/ Roberto F. Selva | ||||
Roberto F. Selva | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||||||
Dated: August 9, 2013 | By: | /s/ Andrew H. Parnes | ||||
Andrew H. Parnes | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
50
Exhibit 3.2
FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVENTH AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVENTH AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (this Amendment) is entered into as of August 6, 2013, by and among J.F. Shea, G.P., a Delaware general partnership, as general partner (the General Partner), and the persons whose names are ascribed hereto, as Limited Partners, (the Limited Partners). Capitalized Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Seventh Amended Agreement (as defined below).
R E C I T A L S
A. The General Partner, and Limited Partners, entered into that certain Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Shea Homes Limited Partnership dated as of March 11, 2013 (the Seventh Amended Agreement or Partnership Agreement).
B. The General Partner and the Limited Partners desire to amend the Seventh Amended Agreement in order to modify the Class B Preferred Return and the Class D Preferred Return effective January 1, 2013.
A G R E E M E N T
NOW, THEREFORE, taking the foregoing Recitals into account, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the General Partner and the Limited Partners do hereby amend the Seventh Amended Agreement in the following particulars only:
1. Class B Preferred Return. Effective January 1, 2013 (and hence Fiscal Year 1 for the purposes of this Amendment shall be January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013), the definition in Article 2 of Class B Preferred Return is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Class B Preferred Return means, with respect to any Partner a return equal to the following for the applicable Fiscal Year (or portion thereof):
i. | Fiscal Years 1-4an annual rate of return equal to one and two tenths percent (1.2%) |
ii. | Fiscal Years 5-8an annual rate of return equal to two and twenty five one hundredths percent (2.25%) |
iii. | Fiscal Year 9 and every Fiscal Year thereafterthe Wells Fargo Bank Rate for such Fiscal Year (or portion thereof) calculated on the Class B Amount as of the first day of such Fiscal Year |
1
2. Class D Preferred Return. Effective January 1, 2013 (and as noted above Fiscal Year 1 for the purposes of this Amendment shall be January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013), the definition in Article 2 of Class D Preferred Return is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Class D Preferred Return means, with respect to any Partner a return equal to the following for the applicable Fiscal Year (or portion thereof):
i. | Fiscal Years 1-4an annual rate of return equal to two percent (2.0%) |
ii. | Fiscal Years 5-8an annual rate of return equal to twelve and seventy five one hundredths percent (12.75%) |
iii. | Fiscal Year 9 and every Fiscal Year thereafteran annual rate of return equal to seven percent (7.0%) |
3. Miscellaneous.
a. Amendment Controlling. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control. Except to the extent expressly amended pursuant to this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification.
b. Counterparts; Facsimile. This Amendment may be (i) executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall together constitute one and the same document and (ii) executed and delivered by the exchange of electronic facsimile copies of the signed counterparts, which facsimile counterparts shall be binding upon the parties.
c. Authorization. By his or her signature, each person executing this Amendment on behalf of a party hereto represents and warrants to the other party hereto that he or she is duly authorized to do so.
d. Entire Agreement. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect to the matters contained in this Amendment. All prior and contemporaneous understandings, representations or agreements among the parties with respect to this subject matter, verbal or written, are merged into this Amendment.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership | ||
GENERAL PARTNER | ||
J.F. SHEA, G.P., a Delaware general partnership | ||
By: | J.F. Shea Management, L.P., | |
a Delaware limited partnership | ||
its general partner |
By: | J.F. Shea Construction Management, Inc., a California corporation, its general partner |
By: | /s/ Peter O. Shea, Jr. | |||||
Name: | Peter O. Shea, Jr. | |||||
Title: | President | |||||
By: | /s/ James G. Shontere | |||||
Name: | James G. Shontere | |||||
Title: | Secretary |
LIMITED PARTNERS | ||
J.F. SHEA CO., INC., a Nevada corporation | ||
By: | /s/ James G. Shontere | |
Name: | James G. Shontere | |
Title: | Secretary | |
By: | /s/ Robert Odell | |
Name: | Robert Odell | |
Title: | Vice-President & Treasurer |
JOHN SHEA FAMILY TRUST, dated May 20, 2005 | ||
By: | /s/ John F. Shea | |
John F. Shea, Trustee |
3
ORLANDO ROAD LLC, | ||
a Delaware limited liability company | ||
By: | /s/ John F. Shea | |
Name: | John F. Shea | |
Title: | President | |
By: | /s/ James G. Shontere | |
Name: | James G. Shontere | |
Title: | Secretary | |
VIRGINIA ROAD LLC, a Delaware limited liability company | ||
By: | /s/ John C. Morrissey | |
Name: | John C. Morrissey | |
Title: | President | |
By: | /s/ James G. Shontere | |
Name: | James G. Shontere | |
Title: | Secretary | |
BAY FRONT DRIVE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company | ||
By: | /s/ Peter O. Shea | |
Name: | Peter O. Shea | |
Title: | President | |
By: | /s/ James G. Shontere | |
Name: | James G. Shontere | |
Title: | Secretary | |
SHEA INVESTMENTS, a California general partnership | ||
By: | /s/ Carrie Shea Tilton | |
Carrie Shea Tilton, Trustee of Carrie | ||
Shea Tilton Revocable Trust |
4
TAHOE PARTNERSHIP I, a California general partnership | ||
By: | /s/ Peter O. Shea | |
Name: | Peter O. Shea | |
Title: | Managing Partner | |
BALBOA PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership | ||
By: | /s/ Peter O. Shea, Jr. | |
Peter O. Shea, Jr., as Trustee of the Peter O. Shea Jr. Separate Property Trust dated March 17, 1985, Amended January 14, 2013 | ||
By: | /s/ Ronald L. Lakey | |
Ronald L. Lakey, as Trustee of the Catherine | ||
Shea Johnson Trust dated November 13, 1984, as Amended on March 1, 1989, July 22, 1993 and September 30, 2004 | ||
By: | /s/ Ronald L. Lakey | |
Ronald L. Lakey, as Trustee of the Sarah H. Shea Trust dated October 15, 1987, as amended on March 1, 1989 and June 29, 1999 | ||
SURVIVORS TRUST U/A EIGHTH E & M SHEA REVOCABLE TRUST u/d/t 4/07/09 | ||
By: | /s/ John C. Morrissey | |
John C. Morrissey, Trustee | ||
By: | /s/ Mary Shea | |
Mary Shea, Trustee | ||
PETER O. AND CAROLYN H. SHEA REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JANUARY 11, 1995, AS AMENDED | ||
By: | /s/ Peter O. Shea | |
Peter O. Shea, Trustee |
5
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Roberto F. Selva, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shea Homes Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
By: | /s/ Roberto F. Selva | |
Roberto F. Selva | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: August 9, 2013
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Andrew H. Parnes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shea Homes Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
By: | /s/ Andrew H. Parnes | |
Andrew H. Parnes | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Date: August 9, 2013
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 of Shea Homes Limited Partnership, (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roberto F. Selva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Shea Homes Limited Partnership and will be retained by Shea Homes Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
/s/ Roberto F. Selva |
Roberto F. Selva |
Chief Executive Officer |
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: August 9, 2013
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 of Shea Homes Limited Partnership, (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew H. Parnes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Shea Homes Limited Partnership and will be retained by Shea Homes Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
/s/ Andrew H. Parnes |
Andrew H. Parnes |
Chief Financial Officer |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Date: August 9, 2013
Other Liabilities
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities | 11. Other Liabilities At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, other liabilities were as follows:
Completed Operations Reserves for completed operations primarily represent claims for property damage to completed homes and projects outside of our one-to-two year warranty period. Specific terms and conditions of completed operations claims vary depending on the market in which homes close and can range to 12 years from the close of a home. Expenses and liabilities are recorded for potential completed operations claims based upon aggregated loss experience, which includes an estimate of completed operations claims incurred but not reported, and is actuarially estimated using individual case-based valuations and statistical analysis. For policy years from August 1, 2001 through the present, completed operations claims are insured or reinsured through a combination of third-party and affiliate insurance carriers. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, changes in completed operations reserves were as follows:
Reserves provided (relieved) for completed operations are generally fully offset by changes in insurance receivables (see Note 5), however, premiums paid for completed operations are included in cost of sales. For actual completed operations claims and estimates of completed operations claims incurred but not reported, we estimate and record insurance receivables under applicable policies when recovery is probable. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, insurance receivables were $131.2 million and $131.5 million, respectively. Expenses, liabilities and receivables related to these claims are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in completed operations claims related to our markets and products built, claim settlement patterns and insurance industry practices. Although considerable variability is inherent in such estimates, we believe reserves for completed operations claims are adequate.
Warranty Reserve We offer a limited one or two year warranty for our homes. Specific terms and conditions of these warranties vary depending on the market in which homes close. We estimate warranty costs to be incurred and record a liability and an expense to cost of sales when home revenue is recognized. We also include in our warranty reserve the uncovered losses related to completed operations coverage, which approximates 12.5% of the total property damage estimate. Factors affecting warranty liability include number of homes closed, historical and anticipated warranty claims, and cost per claim history and trends. We periodically assess adequacy of our warranty liabilities and adjust amounts as necessary. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, changes in warranty liability were as follows:
Deferred Revenue/Gain Deferred revenue/gain represents deferred profit on transactions in which an insufficient down payment was received or a future performance, passage of time or event is required. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, deferred revenue/gain primarily represents the PIC Transaction described below. Completed operations claims were insured through PIC for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2007. In December 2009, PIC entered into a series of novation and reinsurance transactions (the “PIC Transaction”). First, PIC entered into a novation agreement with JFSCI to novate its deductible reimbursement obligations related to its workers’ compensation and general liability risks at September 30, 2009 for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2007, and its completed operations risks from August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2007. Concurrently, JFSCI entered into insurance arrangements with unrelated third party insurance carriers to insure these policies. As a result of this novation, a $19.2 million gain was originally deferred and will be recognized as income when related claims are paid. In addition, the deferred gain may be adjusted either up or down as changes to the underlying insurance reserves occur based on actuarial estimates. An increase to the deferred gain will result in a current period charge while a decrease in the deferred gain will result in current period income. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unamortized deferred gain was $19.7 million and $20.3 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of this deferral as income, which was included in other income (expense), net and represented the impact of a decrease in the deferred gain due to actuarial estimates and income recognition on claims paid. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $(2.3) million and $(1.7) million, respectively, of this deferral as expense, which was included in other income (expense), net and represented the impact of an increase in the deferred gain due to actuarial estimates, partially offset by income recognition on claims paid. Second, PIC entered into reinsurance agreements with various unrelated reinsurers that reinsured 100% of the completed operations risks from August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2005. As a result of the reinsurance, a $15.6 million gain was originally deferred and will be recognized as income when the related claims are paid. In addition, the deferred gain can be increased or decreased based on changes in actuarial estimates. Any changes to the deferred gain will be recognized as a current period gain or charge. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unamortized deferred gain was $9.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $(1.2) million and $(0.7) million, respectively, of this deferral as expense, which was included in other income (expense), net. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized $(5.9) million and $(5.7) million, respectively, of this deferral as expense, which was included in other income (expense), net. The expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 represented the impact of an increase in the deferred gain due to actuarial estimates, partially offset by income recognition on claims paid. As a result of the PIC Transaction, if the estimated ultimate loss to be paid under these policies exceeds the policy limits under the novation and reinsurance transactions, the shortfall is expected to be funded by JFSCI for the policies novated to JFSCI and by PIC for the policies they reinsured.
Distributions Payable In December 2011, our consolidated joint venture, Vistancia, LLC, sold its remaining interest in an unconsolidated joint venture (the “Vistancia Sale”). As a result of the Vistancia Sale, no other assets of Vistancia, LLC economically benefit the former non-controlling member of Vistancia, LLC and the Company recorded the remaining $3.3 million distribution payable to this member, which is paid $0.1 million quarterly. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the remaining distribution payable was $2.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively. |
Other Assets (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Other Assets [Line Items] | ||
Income tax receivable | $ 2,991 | $ 3,497 |
Investments | 9,399 | 12,078 |
Property and equipment, net | 2,142 | 2,237 |
Prepaid professional fees | 3,181 | 3,451 |
Prepaid loan fees | 6,164 | 6,688 |
Prepaid bank fees | 380 | 403 |
Deposits in lieu of bonds and letters of credit | 11,427 | 7,110 |
Prepaid insurance | 481 | 2,148 |
Other | 1,056 | 1,515 |
Total other assets, net | $ 37,221 | $ 39,127 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|
Net income (loss) | $ 19,532 | $ (12,120) | $ 26,369 | $ (12,318) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax | ||||
Unrealized investment holding gains (losses) during the year | 175 | (290) | 425 | 1,953 |
Less: Reclassification adjustments for investment (gains) losses included in other income (expense) | 0 | 23 | (37) | 0 |
Comprehensive income (loss), before tax | 19,707 | (12,387) | 26,757 | (10,365) |
Income tax expense relating to other comprehensive income / (loss) | (68) | (374) | (151) | (1,151) |
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 19,639 | (12,761) | 26,606 | (11,516) |
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests | 2 | 19 | 3 | (194) |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to SHLP | $ 19,641 | $ (12,742) | $ 26,609 | $ (11,710) |
Fair Value Disclosures
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Disclosures | 4. Fair Value Disclosures At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as required by ASC 825, the following presents net book values and estimated fair values of notes payable.
The $750.0 million 8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 (the “Secured Notes”) are level 2 financial instruments in which fair value was based on quoted market prices in an inactive market at the end of the period. Other financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and other liabilities and secured promissory notes. Book values of these financial instruments approximate fair value due to their relatively short-term nature. In addition, included in other assets are available-for-sale marketable securities, which are recorded at fair value. |
Supplemental Guarantor Information
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Guarantor Information | 18. Supplemental Guarantor Information The obligations under the Secured Notes are not guaranteed by any SHLP joint venture where SHLP and Shea Homes Funding Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary (collectively “SHLP Corp.”), does not own 100% of the economic interest, including those that are consolidated, and the collateral securing the Secured Notes does not include a pledge of the capital stock of any subsidiary if such pledge would result in a requirement that SHLP Corp file separate financial statements with respect to such subsidiary pursuant to Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act. Pursuant to the Indenture governing the Secured Notes, a guarantor may be released from its guarantee obligations only under certain customary circumstances specified in the Indenture, namely (1) upon the sale or other disposition (including by way of consolidation or merger) of such guarantor, (2) upon sale of disposition of all or substantially all the assets of such guarantor, (3) upon the designation of such guarantor as an unrestricted subsidiary for covenant purposes in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, (4) upon a legal defeasance or covenant defeasance pursuant to the Indenture, or (5) upon the full satisfaction of our obligations under the Indenture. Presented herein are the condensed consolidated financial statements provided for in Rule 3-10(f) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act for the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet December 31, 2012
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive income (Loss) Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
Contingent Liabilities And Commitments (Parenthetical) (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Commitment And Contingencies [Line Items] | ||
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure | $ 70,000 | |
Tax Court Member
|
||
Commitment And Contingencies [Line Items] | ||
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure | $ 70,000 | $ 70,000 |
Notes Payable (Parenthetical) (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
May 10, 2011
|
---|---|---|---|
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Principal amount | $ 750,000 | $ 750,000 | $ 750,000 |
Interest rate | 8.625% | 8.625% | |
Maturity period | 2019-05 | 2019-05 | |
Promissory Notes Maturing 2014
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Maturity year | 2014 | 2014 | |
Promissory Notes Maturing 2014 | Minimum
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Interest rate | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
Promissory Notes Maturing 2014 | Maximum
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Interest rate | 6.00% | 6.00% |
Related Party Transactions
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related Party Transactions | 12. Related Party Transactions Related Party Receivables and Payables At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, receivables from related parties, net were as follows:
In May 2011, concurrent with issuance of the Secured Notes, the previous unsecured receivable from JFSCI was partially paid down and the balance converted to a $38.9 million unsecured term note receivable, bearing 4% interest, payable in equal quarterly installments and maturing May 15, 2019. In 2013 and 2012, JFSCI elected to make prepayments, including accrued interest, of $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and applied these prepayments to future installments such that JFSCI would not be required to make a payment until November 2014. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the note receivable from JFSCI, including accrued interest, was $24.6 million and $24.5 million, respectively. Quarterly, we evaluate collectability of the note receivable from JFSCI, which includes consideration of JFSCI’s payment history, operating performance and future payment requirements under the note. Based on these criteria, and as JFSCI applied prepayments under the note to defer future installments until August 2014, we do not anticipate collection risks on the note receivable from JFSCI. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, note receivable from unconsolidated joint venture, including accrued interest, was $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The note receivable bears interest at 8% and matures in 2020. Further, this note earns additional interest to achieve a 17.5% internal rate of return, subject to available cash flows of the joint venture, and can be repaid prior to 2020. Quarterly, we evaluate collectability of this note, which includes consideration of prior payment history, operating performance and future payment requirements under the applicable note. Based on these criteria, we do not anticipate collection risks on this note. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, notes receivable from other related parties, including accrued interest, were $6.6 million and $7.2 million, respectively, net of related reserves of $12.8 million and $12.8 million, respectively. These notes are unsecured and mature from August 2016 through April 2021. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these notes bore interest ranging from Prime less .75% (2.5%) to 4.25%. Quarterly, we evaluate collectability of these notes which includes consideration of prior payment history, operating performance and future payment requirements under the applicable notes. At December 31, 2009, based on these criteria, two notes receivable were deemed uncollectible and fully reserved. We do not anticipate collection risks on the other notes. The Company, entities under common control and certain unconsolidated joint ventures also engage in transactions on behalf of the other, such as payment of invoices and payroll. The amounts resulting from these transactions are recorded in receivables from related parties or payables to related parties, are non-interest bearing, due on demand and generally paid monthly. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these receivables were $3.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and these payables were $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions In May 2012, for a nominal amount, SHLP purchased the non-controlling member’s entire 16.7% interest in Vistancia, LLC, a consolidated joint venture. However, the distribution payable remained (see Note 11). In March 2012, SHLP’s entire 58% interest in Shea Colorado, LLC (“SCLLC”), a consolidated joint venture with Shea Properties II, LLC, a related party and the non-controlling member, was redeemed by SCLLC. In valuing its 58% interest in SCLLC, and to ensure receipt of net assets of equal value to its ownership interest, SHLP used third-party real estate appraisals. The estimated fair value of the assets received by SHLP was $30.8 million. However, as the non-controlling member is a related party under common control, the assets and liabilities received by SHLP were recorded at net book value and the difference in SHLP’s investment in SCLLC and the net book value of the assets and liabilities received was recorded as a reduction to SHLP’s equity.
As consideration for the redemption, SCLLC distributed assets and liabilities to SHLP having a net book value of $24.0 million, including $2.2 million cash, a $3.0 million secured note receivable, $20.0 million of inventory and $1.2 million of other liabilities. As a result of this redemption, SCLLC is no longer included in these consolidated financial statements effective March 31, 2012. This transaction resulted in a net reduction of $41.8 million in assets and $2.0 million in liabilities, and a $39.8 million reduction in total equity, of which $11.6 million was attributable to SHLP and $28.2 million was attributable to non-controlling interests. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, we were the managing member for nine and seven, respectively, unconsolidated joint ventures and received a management fee from these joint ventures as reimbursement for direct and overhead costs incurred on behalf of the joint ventures and other associated costs. Fees from joint ventures representing reimbursement of our costs are recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expense. Fees from joint ventures representing amounts in excess of our costs are recorded as revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, $2.0 million and $3.6 million of management fees, respectively, were offset against general and administrative expenses, and $0.1 million and $0.1 million of management fees, respectively, were included in revenues. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, $0.7 million and $1.7 million of management fees, respectively, were offset against general and administrative expenses, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million of management fees, respectively, were included in revenues. Other Related Party Transactions JFSCI provides corporate services to us, including management, legal, tax, information technology, risk management, facilities, accounting, treasury and human resources. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expenses included $5.9 million and $11.1 million, respectively, for corporate services provided by JFSCI. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses included $4.5 million and $8.4 million, respectively, for corporate services provided by JFSCI. We lease office space from related parties under non-cancelable operating leases. Leases are for five to ten year terms and generally provide for five year renewal options. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, related-party rental expense was $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, related-party rental expense was $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. We obtain workers compensation insurance, commercial general liability insurance and insurance for completed operations losses and damages with respect to our homebuilding operations from affiliate and unrelated third party insurance providers. These policies are purchased by affiliate entities and we pay premiums to these affiliates for the coverage provided by these third party and affiliate insurance providers. Policies covering these risks are written at various coverage levels but include a large self-insured retention or deductible. We have retention liability insurance from affiliated entities to insure these large retentions or deductibles. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, amounts paid to affiliates for this retention insurance coverage were $3.9 million and $7.8 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, amounts paid to affiliates for this retention insurance coverage were $3.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively. |
Interest Incurred, Capitalized and Expensed (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|||||||||
Capitalized Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||||
Interest incurred | $ 16,774 | $ 16,660 | $ 33,542 | $ 33,320 | ||||||||
Interest expensed | 1,397 | [1] | 5,909 | [1] | 4,830 | [1] | 12,197 | [1] | ||||
Inventory
|
||||||||||||
Capitalized Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||||
Interest capitalized as a cost of inventory during the period | 14,871 | 10,550 | 27,949 | 20,745 | ||||||||
Interest previously capitalized as a cost of inventory, included in cost of sales | (15,393) | (10,074) | (24,904) | (17,858) | ||||||||
Interest capitalized in ending inventory | 105,894 | [2] | 114,323 | [2] | 105,894 | [2] | 114,323 | [2] | ||||
Investments In Joint Ventures
|
||||||||||||
Capitalized Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||||
Interest capitalized as a cost of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the period | 506 | 201 | 763 | 378 | ||||||||
Interest previously capitalized as a cost of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, included in equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures | (328) | (201) | (585) | (378) | ||||||||
Interest capitalized in ending investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | $ 178 | $ 0 | $ 178 | $ 0 | ||||||||
|
Notes Payable - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
May 10, 2011
|
|
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Accrued interest | $ 8,086 | $ 8,086 | |
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Maturity date | May 15, 2019 | ||
Accrued interest | 8,100 | 8,100 | |
Principal amount of debt issued | $ 750,000 | $ 750,000 | $ 750,000 |
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 | Semi Annual Payment, First Payment
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Interest payment date | May 15 | ||
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 | Semi Annual Payment, Second Payment
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Interest payment date | November 15 | ||
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 | Redeem On Or After May 15, 2015
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Note redemption price | $ 104.313 | ||
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019 | Redeem On Or After May 15, 2016
|
|||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |||
Note redemption price | $ 102.156 |
Basis of Presentation - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
12 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2012
Reclassification From Investments To Other Assets
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Reclassification From Property And Equipment To Other Assets
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Reclassification From Other Income Expense To Gain Loss On Reinsurance Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2013
JFSCI
|
|
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items] | ||||
Ownership Interest | 96.00% | |||
Reclassification adjustment | $ 12.1 | $ 2.2 | $ 7.4 |
Accounts and Other Receivables, net (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts and Other Receivables | At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accounts and other receivables, net were as follows:
|
Fair Value Disclosures (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Book Values and Estimated Fair Values of Notes Payable | At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as required by ASC 825, the following presents net book values and estimated fair values of notes payable.
|
Inventory (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Inventory [Line Items] | ||
Homes under construction | $ 263,912 | $ 189,929 |
Lots available for construction | 284,196 | 249,463 |
Land under development | 189,261 | 175,922 |
Land held for future development | 79,656 | 60,466 |
Land held for sale, including water system connection rights | 73,024 | 71,381 |
Land deposits and preacquisition costs | 10,986 | 7,267 |
Total inventory | 994,103 | 837,653 |
Model Homes
|
||
Inventory [Line Items] | ||
Inventory finished homes | 71,572 | 69,210 |
Completed Homes for Sale
|
||
Inventory [Line Items] | ||
Inventory finished homes | $ 21,496 | $ 14,015 |
Contingencies and Commitments (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent Liabilities And Commitments | At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, certain unrecorded contingent liabilities and commitments were as follows:
|
Restricted Cash - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
1 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Jan. 31, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents Items [Line Items] | |||
Restricted cash used as collateral released | $ 10.0 | ||
Restricted cash | $ 2.3 | $ 13.0 |
Investments in Joint Ventures - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
|
6 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Guarantee provided
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Guarantee provided
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Maximum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Minimum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Impairment on investments in joint ventures
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Impairment on investments in joint ventures
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Impairment on investments in joint ventures
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Impairment on investments in joint ventures
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Venture One
Guarantee provided
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Unconsolidated Joint Venture One
Guarantee provided
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Two
|
|
Investment [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||
Ownership Interest | 50.00% | |||||||||||||
Deficit Distributions | $ 504,000 | $ 716,000 | ||||||||||||
Impairments charges on investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Indemnification agreement from joint ventures, percentage | 90.00% | 90.00% | 50.00% | |||||||||||
Notes payable outstanding | 0 | 0 | 49,400,000 | 45,600,000 | ||||||||||
Maximum remargin obligation | 70,000,000 | 24,700,000 | 22,800,000 | |||||||||||
Maximum liability (cap) | 35,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Revolving basket available for joint venture investment | 70,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio | 200.00% | |||||||||||||
Percentage of cumulative consolidated net income | 50.00% | |||||||||||||
Committed capital contribution in joint venture | 45,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Aggregate capital contributions | $ 39,400,000 | $ 28,653,000 | $ 9,500,000 |
Notes Payable (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Notes Payable | At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, notes payable were as follows:
|
Income Taxes - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
SHI
|
Dec. 31, 2009
SHI
Maximum
|
Dec. 31, 2009
SHLP
Maximum
|
|
Income Taxes [Line Items] | |||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | $ 479,000 | $ 848,000 | $ 420,000 | $ 96,000 | $ (400,000) | ||
Deferred tax asset | 31,500,000 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | 31,500,000 | ||||||
Amount company could be obligated to pay | 64,000,000 | 107,000,000 | |||||
Initial Maximum CCM Payment | $ 70,000,000 | $ 70,000,000 |
Financial Information for Reportable Segments - Revenues (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | $ 217,310 | $ 132,468 | $ 352,270 | $ 238,071 |
Corporate
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 336 | 250 | 457 | 493 |
Homebuilding
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 216,974 | 132,218 | 351,813 | 237,578 |
Homebuilding | Southern California
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 56,134 | 30,104 | 96,289 | 56,484 |
Homebuilding | San Diego
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 31,358 | 10,180 | 40,988 | 24,287 |
Homebuilding | Northern California
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 53,483 | 30,438 | 81,132 | 56,396 |
Homebuilding | Mountain West
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 39,884 | 33,211 | 62,190 | 51,806 |
Homebuilding | South West
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | 34,151 | 26,700 | 67,684 | 46,215 |
Homebuilding | Other Areas
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Revenues | $ 1,964 | $ 1,585 | $ 3,530 | $ 2,390 |
Related Party Transactions - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Minimum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Maximum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Related Party Receivables and Payables
Minimum
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Related Party Receivables and Payables
Minimum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Related Party Receivables and Payables
Maximum
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Related Party Receivables and Payables
Maximum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Related Party Receivables and Payables
Other
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Related Party Receivables and Payables
Other
|
Mar. 31, 2012
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Redemption or Purchase of Interest in Joint Venture
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Non Interest Bearing
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Non Interest Bearing
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Affiliated Entity
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Affiliated Entity
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Affiliated Entity
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Affiliated Entity
|
Mar. 31, 2012
SHLP
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Redemption or Purchase of Interest in Joint Venture
|
May 31, 2012
SHLP
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Redemption or Purchase of Interest in Joint Venture
|
Mar. 31, 2012
SCLLC
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Redemption or Purchase of Interest in Joint Venture
|
Jun. 30, 2013
JFSCI
|
May 31, 2011
JFSCI
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Jun. 30, 2013
JFSCI
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Jun. 30, 2012
JFSCI
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Dec. 31, 2012
JFSCI
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Jun. 30, 2013
JFSCI
General and Administrative Related Party Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2012
JFSCI
General and Administrative Related Party Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2013
JFSCI
General and Administrative Related Party Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2012
JFSCI
General and Administrative Related Party Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Maximum
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Related Party Receivables and Payables
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Partner Notes Payable
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Other Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Partner Notes Payable
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Other Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
|
Jun. 30, 2013
Partner Notes Payable
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Other Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Entity
|
Jun. 30, 2012
Partner Notes Payable
Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Other Real Property and Joint Venture Transactions
Entity
|
|
Related Party Transaction [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible notes receivable | $ 38,900,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bearing interest from notes receivable | 2.50% | 2.50% | 4.25% | 4.25% | 4.00% | 8.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable maturity date | May 15, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prepayment on notes | 1,800,000 | 1,900,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable | 19,385,000 | 19,385,000 | 19,940,000 | 6,600,000 | 7,200,000 | 24,600,000 | 24,500,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable, maturity year | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal rate of returns | 17.50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves for notes receivable from other related parties | 12,803,000 | 12,803,000 | 12,766,000 | 12,800,000 | 12,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable, maturity periods | August 2016 through April 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest monthly based on Prime less | 0.75% | 0.75% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables from related parties | 2,975,000 | 2,975,000 | 2,088,000 | 3,000,000 | 2,100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payables to related parties | 4,159,000 | 4,159,000 | 125,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership Interest | 58.00% | 16.70% | 96.00% | 50.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated fair value assets received | 30,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributed assets and liabilities | 24,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash from distribution | 2,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured notes receivable | 3,181,000 | 3,181,000 | 3,662,000 | 3,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory | 20,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 246,890,000 | 246,890,000 | 233,218,000 | 1,200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in assets | 41,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in liabilities | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in equity | 39,800,000 | 11,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in equity of non-controlling interest | 28,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of unconsolidated joint ventures | 9 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 14,078,000 | 11,573,000 | 26,035,000 | 19,824,000 | 5,900,000 | 4,500,000 | 11,100,000 | 8,400,000 | 2,000,000 | 700,000 | 3,600,000 | 1,700,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management fees | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leases | 5 years | 10 years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease renewal option term | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related party rental expense | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts paid to affiliates for insurance coverage | $ 3,900,000 | $ 3,200,000 | $ 7,800,000 | $ 5,900,000 |
Fair Value Disclosures - Additional Information (Detail) (8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019, USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||
Net Book Value | $ 750,000 | $ 750,000 |
Interest rate | 8.625% | 8.625% |
Maturity period | 2019-05 | 2019-05 |
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2
|
||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||
Net Book Value | $ 750,000 | |
Interest rate | 8.625% | 8.625% |
Maturity period | 2019-05 | 2019-05 |
Supplemental Disclosures to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | ||
Income taxes paid (refunded) | $ 66 | $ (2,391) |
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized | 4,689 | 11,853 |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities | ||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net | 237 | 802 |
Reclassification of Deficit Distributions to (from) unconsolidated joint ventures from (to) other liabilities | (212) | (82) |
Purchase of land in exchange for note payable | 2,283 | 1,097 |
Elimination of joint venture inventory, receivables from related parties and other assets | 0 | (41,600) |
Elimination of joint venture note payable and other liabilities | 0 | (1,949) |
Redemption of Company's interest in consolidated joint venture and elimination of non-controlling interest, less cash retained by non-controlling interest | $ 0 | $ (39,651) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|
Inventory | Inventory Inventory is stated at cost, unless the carrying amount is determined not to be recoverable, in which case inventory is adjusted to fair value or fair value less cost to sell. Quarterly, we review our real estate assets at each community for indicators of impairment. Real estate assets include projects actively selling, under development, held for future development or held for sale. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in local housing market values and prices of comparable homes, significant decreases in gross margins and sales absorption rates, costs in excess of budget, and actual or projected cash flow losses. If there are indications of impairment, we analyze the budgets and cash flows of our real estate assets and compare the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows of the community to the asset’s carrying value. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment is required. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and adjusted to fair value. For land held for sale, if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment in required. These impairment evaluations require use of estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if estimated future undiscounted cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. When estimating undiscounted cash flows of a community, various assumptions are made, including: (i) the number of homes available and the expected prices and incentives offered by us or builders in other communities, and future price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred, including, but not limited to, land and land development, home construction, interest, indirect construction and overhead, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property. Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales rates has a direct impact on the estimated price of a home, the level of time sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and interest), and selling and marketing costs (such as model maintenance and advertising). Depending on the underlying objective of the community, assumptions could have a significant impact on the projected cash flows. For example, if our objective is to preserve operating margins, our cash flows will be different than if the objective is to increase sales. These objectives may vary significantly by community over time. If assets are considered impaired, the impairment charge is the amount the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets or other valuation techniques. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development, construction and delivery timelines; market risk of price erosion; uncertainty of development or construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities. The discount rate used in determining each asset’s fair value depends on the community’s projected life and development stage. |
Completed Operations Claim Costs | Completed Operations Claim Costs We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance which includes coverage for completed operations losses and damages. Most subcontractors carry this insurance through our “rolling wrap-up” insurance program, where our risks and risks of participating subcontractors are insured through a common set of master policies. Completed operations claims reserves primarily represent claims for property damage to completed homes and projects outside of our one-to-two year warranty period. Specific terms and conditions of completed operations warranties vary depending on the market in which homes are closed and can range up to 12 years from the closing of a home. We record expenses and liabilities for estimated costs of potential completed operations claims based upon aggregated loss experience, which includes an estimate of completed operations claims incurred but not reported and is actuarially estimated using individual case-basis valuations and statistical analysis. These estimates make up our entire reserve and are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in completed operations claims related to our markets and products built, changes in claims reporting and settlement patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, insurance regulations and legal precedent. Because state regulations vary, completed operations claims are reported and resolved over an extended period, sometimes exceeding 12 years. As a result, actual costs may differ significantly from estimates.
The actuarial analyses that determine these incurred but not reported claims consider various factors, including frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of these claims and reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses. Due to inherent uncertainties related to these factors, periodic changes to such factors based on updated relevant information could result in actual costs differing significantly from estimates. In accordance with our underlying completed operations insurance policies, these completed operations claims costs are recoverable from our subcontractors or insurance carriers. Completed operations claims through July 31, 2009 are insured or reinsured with third-party insurance carriers and completed operations claims commencing August 1, 2009 are insured with third-party and affiliate insurance carriers. |
Revenues | Revenues In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, revenues from housing and other real estate sales are recognized when the respective units close. Housing and other real estate sales close when all conditions of escrow are met, including delivery of the home or other real estate asset, title passage, appropriate consideration is received or collection of associated receivables, if any, is reasonably assured and when we have no other continuing involvement in the asset. Sales incentives are a reduction of revenues when the respective unit closes. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes SHLP is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. As a limited partnership, SHLP is subject to certain minimal state taxes and fees; however, taxes on income realized by SHLP are generally the obligation of the Partners and their owners. SHI and PIC are C corporations. Federal and state income taxes are provided for these entities in accordance with ASC 740. The provision for, or benefit from, income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect the year in which differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are evaluated to determine whether a valuation allowance should be established based on our determination of whether it is more likely than not some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends primarily on generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Judgment is required in determining future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns. Differences between anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations. |
New Accounting Pronouncements | New Accounting Pronouncements In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. For public entities, the amendments in ASU 2013-02 are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 effective January 1, 2013, which concerned disclosure requirements only and did not impact our consolidated financial statements. |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|
Operating activities | ||
Net income (loss) | $ 26,369 | $ (12,318) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||
Equity in (income) loss from joint ventures | 154 | (384) |
Loss on reinsurance transaction | 159 | 7,367 |
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale investments | (10) | (22) |
Depreciation and amortization expense | 4,564 | 3,321 |
Net interest capitalized on investment in joint ventures | (763) | (378) |
Distributions of earnings from joint ventures | 6,000 | 1,000 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||
Restricted cash | 10,697 | (141) |
Receivables and other assets | (6,524) | (4,846) |
Inventory | (158,601) | (28,542) |
Payables and other liabilities | 9,789 | 1,239 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (108,166) | (33,704) |
Investing activities | ||
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments | 3,078 | 5,212 |
Net collections (advances) on promissory notes from related parties | 431 | 1,843 |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures | (16,350) | (1,183) |
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures | 0 | 223 |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (12,841) | 6,095 |
Financing activities | ||
Principal payments to financial institutions and others | (752) | (1,053) |
Contributions from non-controlling interests | 0 | 1,746 |
Distributions to non-controlling interests | 0 | (345) |
Other financing activities | 0 | (168) |
Net cash provided by (used in) by financing activities | (752) | 180 |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (121,759) | (27,429) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 279,756 | 268,366 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ 157,997 | $ 240,937 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Inventory Inventory is stated at cost, unless the carrying amount is determined not to be recoverable, in which case inventory is adjusted to fair value or fair value less cost to sell. Quarterly, we review our real estate assets at each community for indicators of impairment. Real estate assets include projects actively selling, under development, held for future development or held for sale. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in local housing market values and prices of comparable homes, significant decreases in gross margins and sales absorption rates, costs in excess of budget, and actual or projected cash flow losses. If there are indications of impairment, we analyze the budgets and cash flows of our real estate assets and compare the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows of the community to the asset’s carrying value. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment is required. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and adjusted to fair value. For land held for sale, if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment in required. These impairment evaluations require use of estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if estimated future undiscounted cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. When estimating undiscounted cash flows of a community, various assumptions are made, including: (i) the number of homes available and the expected prices and incentives offered by us or builders in other communities, and future price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred, including, but not limited to, land and land development, home construction, interest, indirect construction and overhead, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property. Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales rates has a direct impact on the estimated price of a home, the level of time sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and interest), and selling and marketing costs (such as model maintenance and advertising). Depending on the underlying objective of the community, assumptions could have a significant impact on the projected cash flows. For example, if our objective is to preserve operating margins, our cash flows will be different than if the objective is to increase sales. These objectives may vary significantly by community over time. If assets are considered impaired, the impairment charge is the amount the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets or other valuation techniques. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development, construction and delivery timelines; market risk of price erosion; uncertainty of development or construction cost increases; and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities. The discount rate used in determining each asset’s fair value depends on the community’s projected life and development stage. Completed Operations Claim Costs We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance which includes coverage for completed operations losses and damages. Most subcontractors carry this insurance through our “rolling wrap-up” insurance program, where our risks and risks of participating subcontractors are insured through a common set of master policies. Completed operations claims reserves primarily represent claims for property damage to completed homes and projects outside of our one-to-two year warranty period. Specific terms and conditions of completed operations warranties vary depending on the market in which homes are closed and can range up to 12 years from the closing of a home. We record expenses and liabilities for estimated costs of potential completed operations claims based upon aggregated loss experience, which includes an estimate of completed operations claims incurred but not reported and is actuarially estimated using individual case-basis valuations and statistical analysis. These estimates make up our entire reserve and are subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in completed operations claims related to our markets and products built, changes in claims reporting and settlement patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, insurance regulations and legal precedent. Because state regulations vary, completed operations claims are reported and resolved over an extended period, sometimes exceeding 12 years. As a result, actual costs may differ significantly from estimates.
The actuarial analyses that determine these incurred but not reported claims consider various factors, including frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of these claims and reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses. Due to inherent uncertainties related to these factors, periodic changes to such factors based on updated relevant information could result in actual costs differing significantly from estimates. In accordance with our underlying completed operations insurance policies, these completed operations claims costs are recoverable from our subcontractors or insurance carriers. Completed operations claims through July 31, 2009 are insured or reinsured with third-party insurance carriers and completed operations claims commencing August 1, 2009 are insured with third-party and affiliate insurance carriers. Revenues In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, revenues from housing and other real estate sales are recognized when the respective units close. Housing and other real estate sales close when all conditions of escrow are met, including delivery of the home or other real estate asset, title passage, appropriate consideration is received or collection of associated receivables, if any, is reasonably assured and when we have no other continuing involvement in the asset. Sales incentives are a reduction of revenues when the respective unit closes. Income Taxes SHLP is treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. As a limited partnership, SHLP is subject to certain minimal state taxes and fees; however, taxes on income realized by SHLP are generally the obligation of the Partners and their owners. SHI and PIC are C corporations. Federal and state income taxes are provided for these entities in accordance with ASC 740. The provision for, or benefit from, income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect the year in which differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are evaluated to determine whether a valuation allowance should be established based on our determination of whether it is more likely than not some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends primarily on generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Judgment is required in determining future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns. Differences between anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations. New Accounting Pronouncements In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes to financial statements, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. For public entities, the amendments in ASU 2013-02 are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 effective January 1, 2013, which concerned disclosure requirements only and did not impact our consolidated financial statements. |
Accounts and Other Receivables, net
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts and Other Receivables, net | 5. Accounts and Other Receivables, net At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, accounts and other receivables, net were as follows:
Insurance receivables are from insurance carriers for reimbursable claims pertaining to resultant damage from construction defects on closed homes (see Note 11). Closed homes for policy years August 1, 2001 to July 31, 2009 are insured or reinsured with third-party insurance carriers, and closed homes for policy years commencing August 1, 2009 are insured with third-party and affiliate insurance carriers. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, insurance receivables from affiliate insurance carriers were $34.4 million and $30.2 million, respectively. We reserve for uncollectible receivables that are specifically identified. |
Financial Information Relating to Reportable Segments - Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
|
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ 20,011 | $ (11,272) | $ 26,789 | $ (12,222) |
Corporate
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (1,218) | (10,429) | (623) | (8,898) |
Homebuilding
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 21,229 | (843) | 27,412 | (3,324) |
Homebuilding | Southern California
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 12,249 | 3,302 | 20,138 | 5,276 |
Homebuilding | San Diego
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 1,004 | (1,502) | (420) | (1,500) |
Homebuilding | Northern California
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 5,648 | 612 | 7,542 | 1,429 |
Homebuilding | Mountain West
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 2,108 | (1,786) | (690) | (5,154) |
Homebuilding | South West
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 169 | (1,494) | 1,144 | (3,150) |
Homebuilding | Other Areas
|
||||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ 51 | $ 25 | $ (302) | $ (225) |
Restricted Cash
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|
Restricted Cash | 3. Restricted Cash At December 31, 2012, restricted cash included cash used as collateral for potential obligations paid by the Company’s bank, customer deposits temporarily restricted in accordance with regulatory requirements, and cash used in lieu of bonds. In January 2013, $10.0 million of restricted cash used as collateral for potential obligations paid by the Company’s bank was released to the Company. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, restricted cash was $2.3 million and $13.0 million, respectively. |
Net Book Values and Estimated Fair Values of Notes Payable (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019
|
||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||
Net Book Value | $ 750,000 | $ 750,000 |
Estimated Fair Value | 821,250 | 828,750 |
Secured Promissory Notes
|
||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||
Net Book Value | 9,740 | 8,209 |
Estimated Fair Value | $ 9,740 | $ 8,209 |
Inventory (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Inventory | At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, inventory was as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Incurred, Capitalized and Expensed | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, interest incurred, capitalized and expensed was as follows:
|
Other Liabilities (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Other Liabilities | At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, other liabilities were as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in Completed Operations Reserves | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, changes in completed operations reserves were as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in Warranty Liabilities | For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, changes in warranty liability were as follows:
|
Financial Information for Reportable Segments - Inventory (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | $ 994,103 | $ 837,653 |
Homebuilding | Southern California
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | 213,816 | 161,700 |
Homebuilding | San Diego
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | 152,820 | 129,895 |
Homebuilding | Northern California
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | 260,990 | 226,307 |
Homebuilding | Mountain West
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | 261,872 | 227,130 |
Homebuilding | South West
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | 102,233 | 89,756 |
Homebuilding | Other Areas
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Inventory | $ 2,372 | $ 2,865 |
Supplemental Guarantor Information (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet | Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet December 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive income (Loss) Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows | Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
|
Financial Information for Reportable Segments - Assets (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | $ 1,411,557 | $ 1,373,537 |
Corporate
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 205,563 | 345,367 |
Homebuilding
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 1,205,994 | 1,028,170 |
Homebuilding | Southern California
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 271,882 | 213,481 |
Homebuilding | San Diego
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 171,691 | 148,272 |
Homebuilding | Northern California
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 298,340 | 256,728 |
Homebuilding | Mountain West
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 334,449 | 297,276 |
Homebuilding | South West
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | 123,314 | 105,470 |
Homebuilding | Other Areas
|
||
Segment Reporting Disclosure [Line Items] | ||
Assets | $ 6,318 | $ 6,943 |
Notes Payable (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Notes payable | $ 759,740 | $ 758,209 |
8.625% senior secured notes due May 2019
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Notes payable | 750,000 | 750,000 |
Promissory Notes Maturing 2014
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Notes payable | $ 9,740 | $ 8,209 |