10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period           to          

Commission File No. 001-35517

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	45-3148087
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 925, Chicago, IL 60602

(Address of principal executive office)  (Zip Code)

(312) 324-5900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:   Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at August 13, 2012
Common stock, $0.01 par value	9,267,162

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION

INDEX

Part I.	Financial Information
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)	2
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)	4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31
Part II.	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	32
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	32
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	32
Item 5.	Other Information	32
Item 6.	Exhibits	33

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	As of
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	87,455		$	1,240
Restricted cash	2,087			—
Loans held for investment	78,173			4,945
Accrued interest receivable	580			3
Deferred financing costs, net	2,212			1,194
Other assets	752			205
Total assets	$	171,259		$	7,587
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Due to affiliates	$	890		827
Dividends payable	555			—
Refundable deposits	—			200
Escrow liability	1,334			—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	822			123
Total liabilities	3,601			1,150
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 and no shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	—			—
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 95,000,000 and 100,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, 9,242,162 and no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	92			—
Additional paid in capital — common stock	169,075			6,600
Accumulated deficit	(1,509		)	(163		)
Total stockholders’ equity	167,658			6,437
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	171,259		$	7,587

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012			For the six months ended June 30, 2012
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Net interest margin:
Interest income	$	1,559		$	2,508
Interest expense	(353		)	(692		)
Net interest margin	1,206			1,816
Expenses:
Management fees	419			419
Professional fees	331			414
General and administrative expenses	323			331
General and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate	308			319
Total expenses	1,381			1,483
Net income (loss)	(175		)	333
Less income attributable to Series A convertible preferred stock:
Quarterly preferred dividends	(50		)	(102		)
Accretion of redemption premium	—			(572		)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	(225		)	(341		)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.09	)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — basic and diluted	6,576,923			3,787,747
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.06		$	0.11

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

	Common Stock			AdditionalPaid-in			Accumulated			Total Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital			Deficit			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011	—	$	—	$	6,600		$	(163	)	$	6,437
Authorized increase in shares of common stock	330,000	3		(3		)	—			—
Private issuance of common stock	1,170,000	12		23,388			—			23,400
Proceeds from public offering of common stock	7,700,000	77		142,373			—			142,450
Stock-based compensation	42,162	—		67			—			67
Offering costs	—	—		(3,350		)	—			(3,350		)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—	—		—			(341		)	(341		)
Dividends declared ($0.11 per share)	—	—		—			(1,005		)	(1,005		)
Balance at June 30, 2012	9,242,162	$	92	$	169,075		$	(1,509	)	$	167,658

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	For the six months endedJune 30, 2012
	(unaudited)
Operating activities:
Net income	$	333
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs	265
Accretion of deferred loan origination fees	(138		)
Stock based compensation	67
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	(753		)
Interest receivable	(577		)
Other assets	(681		)
Due to affiliate	573
Refundable deposits	(200		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	405
Net cash used in operating activities	(706		)
Investing activities:
Issuance of and fundings on loans held for investment, net	(73,164		)
Principal repayment of loans held for investment	74
Payment of furniture, fixtures and equipment	(62		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(73,152		)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from secured financing arrangements	47,277
Repayments of secured financing arrangements	(47,277		)
Secured financing costs	(1,637		)
Series A preferred dividend	(102		)
Proceeds from issuance of Series A convertible preferred stock	5,723
Redemption of Series A convertible preferred stock	(6,295		)
Proceeds for issuance of common stock	165,850
Payment of offering costs	(3,016		)
Pre-IPO common dividend payment	(450		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	160,073
Change in cash and cash equivalents	86,215
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,240
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	87,455
Supplemental Information:
Interest paid during the period	$	426
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activities:
Dividends payable	$	555
Accrued financing and offering costs	379

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

1.ORGANIZATION

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (the “Company,” “ACRE,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated on September 1, 2011, and was initially funded and commenced investment operations on December 9, 2011. The Company is focused primarily on originating, investing in and managing middle-market commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans and other CRE-related investments.  ACRE completed its initial public offering on May 1, 2012 (the “IPO”). The Company is externally managed by Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC (“ACREM” or our “Manager”), a Securities and Exchange Commission registered investment adviser and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ares Management LLC, a global alternative asset manager and also a registered investment adviser.

The Company’s target investments include: “transitional senior” mortgage loans, “stretch senior” mortgage loans, subordinate debt mortgage loans such as B-notes and mezzanine loans and other select commercial real estate debt and preferred equity investments.  “Transitional senior” mortgage loans provide strategic, flexible, short-term financing solutions on transitional CRE middle-market assets that are the subject of a business plan that is expected to enhance the value of the property, are usually funded over time as the borrower’s business plan for the property is executed and have a lower initial loan-to-value ratio as compared to “stretch senior” mortgage loans, with the loan-to-value ratios increasing as the loan is further funded over time.  “Stretch senior” mortgage loans provide flexible “one stop” financing on quality CRE middle-market assets that are typically stabilized or near-stabilized properties with healthy balance sheets and steady cash flows, with the mortgage loans having higher leverage (and thus higher loan-to-value ratios) than conventional mortgage loans and are typically fully funded at closing and non-recourse to the borrower (as compared to conventional mortgage loans, which are usually full recourse to the borrower).

The Company intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with the Company’s taxable year ending December 31, 2012. The Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on the Company’s taxable income to the extent that the Company annually distributes 90% or more of our taxable income to stockholders and complies with various other requirements as a REIT.

Interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Articles 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X. The current period’s results of operations will not necessarily be indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with GAAP, and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s results of the operations and financial condition as of and for the periods presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include funds on deposit with financial institutions.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes escrows for taxes, insurance, leasing outlays, capital expenditures, tenant security deposits, and payments required under certain loan agreements.  These escrow deposits are held on behalf of the respective borrowers and are offset by an escrow cash liability included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

5

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit.

Loans Held for Investment

The Company originates commercial real estate debt and related instruments generally to be held for investment and to maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan fees and origination costs, unless the loans are deemed impaired.

Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, the Company will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate.

Each loan classified as held for investment is evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis.  Loans are collateralized by real estate and as a result, the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower could impact the expected amounts received and are therefore regularly evaluated. The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower’s ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity; (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective.  Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower’s exit plan, among other factors.

Underwriting Commissions and Offering Costs

Underwriting commissions and offering costs incurred in connection with common stock offerings will be reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred that are not directly associated with the completion of a common stock offering will be expensed. Underwriting commissions that are the responsibility of and paid by a related party, such as our Manager, are reflected as a contribution of additional paid in capital from a sponsor in the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Interest income is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount and the contractual terms of each loan. Origination fees, contractual exit fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the initial loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective credit facilities. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $304 and $39 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

6

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

Fair Value Measurements

The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs.  The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are cash and cash equivalents. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment and secured financing agreements. Such financial instruments are carried at cost.  Fair value is separately disclosed (see Note 9).  The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.

Level 3 — Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company recognizes the cost of stock based compensation and payment transactions using the same expense category as would be charged for payments in cash. The fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the award, with an offsetting increase in stockholders’ equity. For grants to directors and officers, the fair value is determined based upon the market price of the stock on the grant date.

Earnings per Share

The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for that period after consideration of the earnings allocated to our restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are participating securities as defined in GAAP.  Diluted earnings per share takes into effect any dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units, except when doing so would be anti-dilutive.

Income Taxes

The Company believes that it will operate in a manner that will allow it to qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of the Company’s expected REIT qualification, the Company does not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level taxes. Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute annually at least 90% of the Company’s taxable income to the Company’s stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the Company’s subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes on the Company’s income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on the Company’s undistributed REIT taxable income.

7

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of investments.

Segment Reporting

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company operated in one business segment.  The Company is primarily engaged in originating, investing in and managing commercial mortgage loans and other commercial real estate-related debt investments.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Repurchase Agreements—In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance that revises the criteria for assessing effective control for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, and the amendment is to be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations or cash flows.

Fair Value Measurement—In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements under GAAP. The new guidance amends current fair value guidance to include increased transparency around valuation inputs and investment categorization. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations or cash flows.

3.LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT

The Company’s investments in mortgages and loans held for investment are accounted for at amortized cost.  The following tables summarize our loans held for investment as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	June 30, 2012
	Carrying Value		Funded Amount		Weighted Average Coupon		Effective Yield		Weighted Average Life (years) *
Senior mortgage loans	$	70,302	$	71,025	6.5	%	7.3	%	2.7
Subordinated debt investment	7,871		8,000		11.5	%	13.1	%	2.6
Total	$	78,173	$	79,025	7.0	%	8.0	%	2.6

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Funded Amount		Weighted Average Coupon		Effective Yield		Weighted Average Life (years) *
Senior mortgage loan	$	4,945	$	5,055	6.5	%	6.6	%	3.0

*Weighted average life is calculated based on the remaining term of the loan from the reporting date multiplied by the weighted average loan balance divided by the total weighted average loan balance for each type of loan held for investment.

8

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the activity in our loan portfolio was as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2011	$	4,945
Initial funding	72,944
Receipt of origination fee	(880		)
Additional funding	1,100
Repayments	(74		)
Origination fee accretion	138
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	78,173

On January 27, 2012, we co-originated a $37,000 commitment for a transitional first mortgage loan on an office building located in Fort Lauderdale, FL. The loan was closed as a $15,000 subordinated debt B-Note, which we retained, and a $22,000 A-Note, which was fully funded by Citibank, N.A., one of our secured funding facility providers. The B-Note was initially funded in the amount of $8,000; net of fees, the funded amount was $7,850.

On February 8, 2012, we originated a $35,000 stretch first mortgage loan on an office building located in Boston, MA. The loan was fully funded at closing; net of fees, the funded amount was $34,650.

On February 13, 2012, we funded $29,945 of the total commitment of $37,950 for a transitional first mortgage loan on an office building located in Austin, TX; net of fees, the funded amount was $29,565.

As of June 30, 2012, all loans were paying in accordance with their terms and there were no loan impairments during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

4.SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment		Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment
Wells Fargo Facility	$	—	$	172,450	$	—	$	75,000
Citibank Facility	—		86,225		—		50,000
Capital One Facility	—		50,000		—		—
Total	$	—	$	308,675	$	—	$	125,000

The secured financing arrangements are generally collateralized by assignments of specific loans held for investment originated by the Company.  The secured financing arrangements are guaranteed by the Company.

Generally, the Company partially offsets interest rate risk by matching the interest index of loans held for investments with the secured financing agreement used to fund them.

Wells Fargo Facility

On December 14, 2011, ACRC Lender W LLC (“Lender W”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a $75,000 secured revolving funding facility arranged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Wells Fargo Facility”), pursuant to which the Company may borrow funds to originate qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes.

Advances under the Wells Fargo Facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to the sum of (i) 30 day LIBOR plus (ii) a pricing margin range of 2.50% - 2.75%. Starting May 15, 2012, the Company incurs a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Wells Fargo Facility.  The initial maturity date of the Wells Fargo Facility is December 14, 2014, subject to two 12-month extension options.

9

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

On May 22, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum availability under the Wells Fargo Facility, subject to available collateral, from $75,000 to $172,450.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Wells Fargo Facility was zero.

Citibank Facility

On December 8, 2011, ACRC Lender C LLC (“Lender C”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a $50,000 secured revolving funding facility arranged by Citibank, N.A. (the “Citibank Facility”), pursuant to which the Company may borrow funds to originate qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes.

Under the Citibank Facility, Lender C may borrow funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans (each, an “Individual Loan”).  Each Individual Loan will be secured by an underlying loan originated by Lender C or an affiliate of Lender C.  Amounts outstanding under each Individual Loan will accrue interest at a per annum rate based on LIBOR. The margin can vary between 3.25% and 4.00% over the greater of LIBOR and 1.0%, based on the debt yield of the assets contributed into Lender C.  Effective March 3, 2012, the Company began incurring a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Citibank Facility.  The maturity date of each Individual Loan will be the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such Individual Loan.

On April 16, 2012 and May 1, 2012, the agreements governing the Citibank Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum availability under the Citibank Facility, subject to available collateral, from $50,000 to $86,225.  The end of the funding period was automatically extended to December 8, 2013 upon the completion of the IPO, and may be further extended for an additional 12 months upon the payment of the applicable extension fee and provided that no event of default is then occurring.   The completion of the IPO triggered a modification of the interest rate margin to a range of 2.50% -3.50% over the greater of LIBOR and 0.5%.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Citibank Facility was zero.

Capital One Facility

On May 18, 2012, ACRC Lender One LLC (“Lender One”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a $50,000 secured revolving funding facility (the “Capital One Facility”) with Capital One, National Association (“Capital One”), as lender and the Company, as guarantor.  The Capital One Facility will be used for originating qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans.  Under the Capital One Facility, Lender One may borrow funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans evidenced by individual notes (each, an “Individual Loan”).  Each Individual Loan will be secured by an underlying loan originated by Lender One or an affiliate of Lender One.  Amounts outstanding under each Individual Loan will accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread ranging between 2.50% and 4.00%.  Lender One may request Individual Loans under the Capital One Facility through and including May 18, 2014, subject to successive 12-month extension options at Capital One’s discretion.  The maturity date of each Individual Loan will be the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such Individual Loan.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Capital One Facility was zero.

Debt Covenants

The Wells Fargo Facility, Citibank Facility and Capital One Facility contain various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that require the Company or certain subsidiaries as guarantor or borrower to maintain minimum tangible net worth, liquidity levels and financial ratios, as defined in the respective agreements.

Effective June 29, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to provide that the required minimum fixed charge coverage ratio with respect to the Company as guarantor will start to be tested upon the earlier to occur of (i) the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2013 and (ii) the first full calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which the Company reports “Loans held for investment” in excess of $200 million on its quarterly consolidated balance sheets. 

10

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

5.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has various commitments to fund investments in its portfolio as described below.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had the following commitments to fund various stretch senior and transitional senior mortgage loans, as well as subordinated debt investments:

	As of
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total commitments	$	98,876		$	11,000
Less: funded commitments	(79,025		)	(5,055		)
Total unfunded commitments	$	19,851		$	5,945

The Company from time to time may be party to litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2012, the Company is not aware of any legal claims.

6.SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

On February 8, 2012, our board of directors adopted resolutions classifying and designating 600 shares of authorized preferred stock as shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”).  Holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, when and as authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of funds legally available for that purpose, dividends at the Prevailing Dividend Rate, compounded quarterly. The “Prevailing Dividend Rate” means (a) beginning on the issue date through and including December 31, 2012, 10% per annum, (b) beginning on January 1, 2013 through and including December 31, 2013, 11% per annum, (c) beginning on January 1, 2014 through and including December 31, 2014, 12% per annum, and (d) beginning on January 1, 2015 and thereafter, 13% per annum; provided, however, that the Prevailing Dividend Rate may decrease by certain specified amounts if the Company achieves a certain coverage ratio.

Shares of Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable by the Company at any time, in whole or in part, beginning on June 30, 2012, at the applicable redemption price. Additionally, shares of Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable at the option of the holder upon an IPO, at the applicable redemption price.  Holders of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock exercised this redemption in connection with the IPO.

In February 2012, we entered into subscription agreements with certain third party investors, pursuant to which such investors subscribed for commitments to purchase up to 475 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $50,000 per share.  On April 2, 2012, a cash dividend of $52 was paid in respect of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.

In May 2012, upon the consummation of the IPO, we redeemed all of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate redemption price of $6,295.  The redemption price for redeemed shares of Series A Preferred Stock was equal to (i) the sum of (a) the subscription price, (b) any dividends per share added thereto pursuant to the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock and (c) any accrued and unpaid dividends per share plus (ii) an amount equal to a percentage of the subscription price of the Series A Preferred Stock and 10%.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we issued 114.4578 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate subscription price of $5,723 and recognized the accretion of $572 for the redemption premium for a total balance of $6,295.

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In December 2011, Ares Investments Holdings LLC (“AIH”), an affiliate of ACREM, contributed $6,600 to the Company in exchange for the Company’s agreement to effectively issue 330,000 shares of our common stock upon an increase in the authorized number of shares of the Company’s common stock. Although there were no shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011, the accompanying consolidated financial statements assume these shares of common stock were issued to AIH during the period ended December 31, 2011.

11

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

On January 25, 2012, we entered into a subscription agreement with AIH, whereby AIH agreed to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of $8,000, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.

On February 6, 2012, we entered into a subscription agreement with AIH, whereby AIH agreed to purchase 770,000 shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of $15,400, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.

On February 8, 2012, the charter of the Company was amended and restated to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock and preferred stock to 95,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares, respectively. The par value remained at $0.01 per share.

On February 22, 2012, our board of directors and AIH approved a one-for-two reverse stock split whereby every two shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to this date were changed into one issued and outstanding share of our common stock.

On May 1, 2012, the Company completed its IPO of 7,700,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $18.50 per share, raising $142,450 in gross proceeds.  The underwriting commissions of $5,328 are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.  Under the underwriting agreement, our Manager was responsible for and paid directly the underwriting commissions. Because the Manager is a related party, the payment of underwriting commission of $5,328 by our Manager is reflected as a contribution of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity in accordance with GAAP.  The Company incurred approximately $3,350 of expenses in connection with the IPO, which is reflected as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The net proceeds to the Company totaled approximately $139,100. The Company used approximately $47,300 of the net proceeds of the IPO to repay outstanding amounts under the Wells Fargo Facility and the Citibank Facility and $6,295 to redeem all of its issued shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  The balance will be used for general corporate working capital purposes and to make investments in our target investments. Until appropriate investments can be identified, we may invest this balance in interest-bearing short-term investments, including money market accounts or funds, and CMBS or corporate bonds, which are consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT.

Equity Incentive Plan

On April 23, 2012, the Company adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.  Pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company may grant awards consisting of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, restricted stock units and/or other equity-based awards to the Company’s outside directors, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, ACREM and other eligible awardees under the plan, subject to an aggregate limitation of 690,000 shares of common stock (7.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the shares sold in the IPO). Any restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and restricted stock units will be accounted for under Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718, resulting in share-based compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value of the underlying restricted shares of common stock or restricted stock units.

On May 1, 2012, in connection with the completion of the IPO, each of the Company’s five independent directors were granted 5,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, on May 1, 2012, each of the Company’s five independent directors were granted 2,027 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as 2012 annual compensation awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

On June 18, 2012, a sixth outside director of the Company was granted 5,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as an award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, on June 18th, 2012, the sixth director was granted 2,027 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as a 2012 annual compensation award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Restricted shares totaling 30,000 will vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a three-year period beginning on July 1, 2012. Restricted shares totaling 12,162 related to 2012 annual compensation awards will vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a one-year period beginning on July 1, 2012.

12

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

Schedule of Non-Vested Share and Share Equivalents

	Restricted Stock Grants
Balance as of December 31, 2011	—
Granted	42,162
Vested	—
Forfeited	—
Balance as of June 30, 2012	42,162

Vesting Schedule

	Restricted Stock Grants
2012	11,081
2013	16,081
2014	10,000
2015	5,000
Total	42,162

8.EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following information sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012:

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012			For the six months ended June 30, 2012
Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(225	)	$	(341	)
Divided by:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding—basic and diluted (1):	6,576,923			3,787,747
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.09	)

(1)The dilutive impact of the Company’s restricted stock grants has not been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

9.FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial Instruments reported at fair value

The Company has certain assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with GAAP, including cash and cash equivalents. The Company did not have any other financial instruments at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011 that were required to be carried at fair value.

The carrying values of interest receivable and accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The carrying values of loans held for investment approximate fair value since the contractual rate approximates market rate.

Financial Instruments reported at cost

The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments carried at historical cost on a quarterly basis. These instruments are recorded at fair value only if they are impaired. No impairment charges have been recognized at June 30, 2012. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated using inputs such as discounted cash flow projections, market comparables, dealer quotes and other quantitative and qualitative factors. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different assumptions or methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. At June 30, 2012, the fair value of our financial instruments approximates cost using Level 3 fair value assumptions.

13

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

10.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Management Agreements

The Company was party to an interim management agreement with ACREM prior to the IPO.  ACREM provides investment advisory and management services to the Company. For providing these services on an interim basis, ACREM had agreed to receive only reimbursements from the Company for any third party costs that ACREM incurs on behalf of the Company.

In addition, two of the Company’s subsidiaries, Lender C and Lender W, along with their respective lenders, Citibank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, have entered into interim servicing agreements with ACREM’s subsidiary servicer, Ares Commercial Real Estate Servicer LLC (“ACRES”), a Standard & Poor’s-ranked commercial primary and special servicer that is included on S&P’s Select Servicer List.  Effective May 1, 2012, ACRES waived the servicing fee but will continue to receive reimbursement for overhead related to servicing and operational activities pursuant to the terms of the management agreement set forth below.

On April 25, 2012, in connection with our IPO, the Company entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with ACREM under which ACREM, subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors, will be responsible for, among other duties, (a) performing all of the Company’s day-to-day functions, (b) determining the Company’s investment strategy and guidelines in conjunction with the Company’s board of directors, (c) sourcing, analyzing and executing investments, asset sales and financing and (d) performing portfolio management duties. In addition, ACREM will have an Investment Committee that will oversee compliance with the Company’s investment strategy and guidelines, investment portfolio holdings and financing strategy.

Effective May 1, 2012, in exchange for its services, ACREM is entitled to receive a base management fee, an incentive fee, expense reimbursements, grants of equity-based awards pursuant to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and a termination fee, if applicable, as set forth below.

The base management fee is equal to 1.5% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity per annum and calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in cash.  For purposes of calculating the management fee, stockholders’ equity means: (a) the sum of (i) the net proceeds from all issuances of the Company’s equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus (ii) the Company’s retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods); less (b) any amount that the Company pays to repurchase our common stock since inception. It also excludes (x) any unrealized gains and losses and other non-cash items that have impacted stockholders’ equity as reported in the Company’s financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and (y) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP (such as a cumulative change to our operating results as a result of a codification change pursuant to GAAP), and certain non-cash items not otherwise described above (such as depreciation and amortization), in each case after discussions between ACREM and the Company’s independent directors and approval by a majority of the Company’s independent directors. As a result, the Company’s stockholders’ equity, for purposes of calculating the management fee, could be greater or less than the amount of stockholders’ equity shown on our financial statements.

The incentive fee is equal to the difference between: (a) the product of (i) 20% and (ii) the difference between (A) the Company’s Core Earnings (as defined below) for the previous 12-month period, and (B) the product of (1) the weighted average of the issue price per share of the Company’s common stock of all of the Company’s public offerings multiplied by the weighted average number of all shares of common stock outstanding (including any restricted stock units, any restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and other shares of the Company’s common stock underlying awards granted under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan as further described below) in the previous 12-month period, and (2) 8%; and (b) the sum of any incentive fees earned by ACREM with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of such previous 12-month period; provided, however, that no incentive fee is payable with respect to any fiscal quarter unless cumulative Core Earnings for the 12 most recently completed fiscal quarters is greater than zero. “Core Earnings” is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as GAAP net income (loss) excluding non-cash equity compensation expense, the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization (to the extent that the Company forecloses on any properties underlying its target investments), any unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income for the period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income. The amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between ACREM and the Company’s independent directors and after approval by a majority of our independent directors.  For purposes of calculating the incentive fee prior to the completion of a 12-month period following this offering, Core Earnings will be calculated on the basis of the number of days that the Management Agreement has been in effect on an annualized basis.  No incentive fees were earned for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

14

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

The Company will reimburse ACREM at cost for operating expenses that ACREM incurs on the Company’s behalf, including expenses relating to legal, financial, accounting, servicing, due diligence and other services. The Company’s reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation. The Company will not reimburse ACREM for the salaries and other compensation of its personnel, except for the allocable share of the salaries and other compensation of the Company’s (a) Chief Financial Officer, based on the percentage of his time spent on the Company’s affairs and (b) other corporate finance, tax, accounting, internal audit, legal, risk management, operations, compliance and other non-investment professional personnel of ACREM or its affiliates who spend all or a portion of their time managing the Company’s affairs based on the percentage of their time spent on the Company’s affairs.  No portion of the interim Chief Financial Officer salary was charged to the Company for the three or six months ended June 30, 2012.  The Company shall pay its pro rata portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses of ACREM and its affiliates required for the Company’s operations.  The initial term of the Management Agreement will end May 1, 2015, with automatic one-year renewal terms that end on the applicable anniversary of the completion of this offering. Except under limited circumstances, upon such a termination, the Company will pay ACREM a termination fee equal to three times the average annual base management fee and incentive fee received by ACREM during the 24 month period immediately preceding the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, each as described above.

Summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company and amounts payable to the Manager:

	Incurred			Payable as of
	Three months ended June 30, 2012		Six months ended June 30, 2012	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Affiliate Payments
Management fees	$	419	419	$	419	—
Servicing fees	6		17	6		—
General and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate	302		302	302		—
Direct third party costs paid by Manager to be reimbursed by the Company
Deferred financing costs	46		149	46		621
Offering costs	41		298	41		—
Other assets	32		47	32		196
General and administrative expenses	44		87	44		10
	$	890	1,319	$	890	827

15

ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of June 30, 2012

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated)

AIH

On February 8, 2012, the Company entered into a promissory note with AIH, whereby AIH loaned the Company $2,000. The note was repaid with $4 in interest due under the note on March 1, 2012 with the proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock.

As of June 30, 2012, AIH owned approximately 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock representing approximately 21.6% of the total shares outstanding.

11.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements included herein. Other than those disclosed below, there have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Form 10-Q or would be required to be recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

On July 9, 2012, the Company appointed Tae-Sik Yoon as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, replacing Richard S. Davis, who served in the same capacity on an interim basis.  As the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Yoon also replaces Mr. Davis as a member of ACREM’s Investment Committee.

On July 9, 2012, Tae-Sik Yoon was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a four-year period.

On August 2, 2012, we originated a $14,300 mezzanine loan collateralized by interests in an office building located in Atlanta, GA. The loan was fully funded at closing; net of fees, the carrying amount is $14,157.  The initial effective yield on the mezzanine loan is 10.7%.

16

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.  Dollar amounts are in thousands, except for share and per share data, percentages and as otherwise indicated. In addition, some of the statements in this quarterly report (including in the following discussion) constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (except where the context suggests otherwise, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company,” “ACRE,” “we,” “us,” or “our”). The forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including statements concerning:

·use of proceeds from our initial public offering (the “IPO”);

·our business and investment strategy;

·our projected operating results;

·the timing of cash flows, if any, from our investments;

·the state of the U.S. economy generally or in specific geographic regions;

·defaults by borrowers in paying debt service on outstanding items;

·actions and initiatives of the U.S. Government and changes to U.S. Government policies;

·our ability to obtain financing arrangements;

·the amount of commercial mortgage loans requiring refinancing;

·financing and advance rates for our target investments;

·our expected leverage;

·general volatility of the securities markets in which we may invest;

·the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of credit markets on our business;

·the uncertainty surrounding the strength of the U.S. economic recovery;

·the return or impact of current and future investments;

·allocation of investment opportunities to us by Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC (our “Manager” or “ACREM”);

·changes in interest rates and the market value of our investments;

·effects of hedging instruments on our target investments;

·rates of default or decreased recovery rates on our target investments;

·the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate volatility;

·changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates, and similar matters (including interpretation thereof);

·our ability to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”);

·our ability to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”);

·availability of investment opportunities in mortgage-related and real estate-related investments and securities;

·the ability of our Manager to locate suitable investments for us, monitor, service and administer our investments and execute our investment strategy;

·availability of qualified personnel;

17

·estimates relating to our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the future;

·our understanding of our competition; and

·market trends in our industry, interest rates, real estate values, the debt securities markets or the general economy.

We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “will,” “should,” “may” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. Our actual results and condition could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Risk Factors” below and in the final prospectus relating to our IPO (the “Prospectus”), dated April 25, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in accordance with Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), on April 27, 2012.

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on information available to us on the date of this Quarterly Report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed or in the future may file with the SEC, including registration statements on Forms S-11 or S-3, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

Overview

We are a recently organized specialty finance company focused on originating, investing in and managing middle-market commercial real estate loans and other commercial real estate (or “CRE”) related investments. We target borrowers whose capital needs are not being met in the market by offering customized financing solutions. We implement a strategy focused on direct origination combined with experienced portfolio management through our Manager’s servicer, which is a Standard & Poor’s-ranked commercial primary servicer and commercial special servicer that is included on S&P’s Select Servicer List, to meet our borrowers’ and sponsors’ needs.

Our investment objective is to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders, primarily through dividends and distributions and secondarily through capital appreciation. We believe the availability of capital in the CRE middle-market is limited and borrowers and sponsors have the greatest need for customized solutions in this segment of the market. We act as a single “one stop” financing source by providing our customers with one or more of our customized financing solutions. Our customized financing solutions are comprised of our “target investments,” which include the following:

·“Transitional senior” mortgage loans that provide strategic, flexible, short-term financing solutions on transitional CRE middle-market assets. These assets are typically properties that are the subject of a business plan that is expected to enhance the value of the property. The mortgage loans are usually funded over time as the borrower’s business plan for the property is executed. They also typically have a lower initial loan-to-value ratios as compared to “stretch senior” mortgage loans, with the loan-to-value ratios increasing as the loan is further funded over time;

·“Stretch senior” mortgage loans that provide flexible “one stop” financing on quality CRE middle-market assets. These assets are typically stabilized or near-stabilized properties with healthy balance sheets and steady cash flows, with the mortgage loans having higher leverage (and thus higher loan-to-value ratios) than conventional mortgage loans and are typically fully funded at closing and non-recourse to the borrower (as compared to conventional mortgage loans, which are usually recourse to the borrower);

·“Subordinate debt” mortgage loans (including subordinate tranches of first lien mortgages, or B-Notes) and mezzanine loans, both of which provide subordinate financing on quality CRE middle-market assets; and

·“Other CRE debt and preferred equity investments,” together with selected other income-producing equity investments.

We are externally managed and advised by our Manager pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. Our Manager is an affiliate of Ares Management LLC (“Ares Management”), a global alternative asset manager and SEC registered investment adviser.

18

We are a Maryland corporation that commenced investment operations on December 9, 2011.  We completed our IPO on May 1, 2012.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We have not made a decision whether to take advantage of any or all of these exemptions. If we do take advantage of any of these exemptions, we do not know if some investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result. The result may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. However, we are choosing to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

We could remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

Factors Impacting Our Operating Results

The results of our operations are affected by a number of factors and primarily depend on, among other things, the level of our net interest income, the market value of our assets and the supply of, and demand for, commercial mortgage loans, CRE debt and other financial assets in the marketplace. Our net interest income, which reflects the amortization of origination fees and direct costs, is recognized based on the contractual rate and the outstanding principal balance of the loans we originate. Interest rates will vary according to the type of investment, conditions in the financial markets, credit worthiness of our borrowers, competition and other factors, none of which can be predicted with any certainty. Our operating results may also be impacted by credit losses in excess of initial anticipations or unanticipated credit events experienced by borrowers.

Changes in Fair Value of Our Assets.  We generally hold our target investments as long-term investments. We evaluate our investments for impairment on at least a quarterly basis and impairments will be recognized when it is probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, the Company will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate, or if repayment is expected solely from the collateral, the fair value of the collateral.

Loans are collateralized by real estate and as a result, the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower, are regularly evaluated.  The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology: (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower’s ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity; (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective.  Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower’s exit plan, among other factors.

19

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all loans were paying in accordance with their terms.  There were no impairments during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Although we generally hold our target investments as long-term investments, we may occasionally classify some of our investments as available-for-sale. Investments classified as available-for-sale will be carried at their fair value, with changes in fair value recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, rather than through earnings. We do not expect to hold any of our investments for trading purposes.

Changes in Market Interest Rates.  With respect to our proposed business operations, increases in interest rates, in general, may over time cause:

·the interest expense associated with our borrowings to increase;

·the value of our mortgage loans to decline;

·coupons on our mortgage loans to reset to higher interest rates; and

·to the extent we enter into interest rate swap agreements as part of our hedging strategy, the value of these agreements to increase.

Conversely, decreases in interest rates, in general, may over time cause:

·the interest expense associated with our borrowings to decrease, subject to any applicable floors;

·the value of our mortgage loan portfolio to increase, subject to any applicable floors;

·to the extent we enter into interest rate swap agreements as part of our hedging strategy, the value of these agreements to decrease; and

·coupons on our floating rate mortgage loans to reset to lower interest rates.

Credit Risk.  We are subject to varying degrees of credit risk in connection with our target investments. Our Manager seeks to mitigate this risk by seeking to originate or acquire investments of higher quality at appropriate prices given anticipated and unanticipated losses, by employing a comprehensive review and selection process and by proactively monitoring originated or acquired investments. Nevertheless, unanticipated credit losses could occur that could adversely impact our operating results and stockholders’ equity.

Market Conditions.  We believe that our target investments currently present attractive risk-adjusted return profiles. We believe that the U.S. CRE markets are currently in the initial stages of a recovery from the severe economic downturn that began in 2007. Following a dramatic decline in CRE lending in 2008 and 2009, debt capital has become more readily available for select stabilized, high quality assets in certain locations such as gateway cities, but remains limited for many other types of properties. For example, we currently anticipate a high demand for customized debt financing from borrowers or sponsors who are looking to refinance indebtedness that is maturing in the next two to five years or are seeking shorter-term debt solutions as they reposition their properties. In addition, we believe the uncertainty surrounding multifamily mortgage finance may provide us incremental lending opportunities in the future as Congress considers restructuring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who have been the most significant sources of multifamily debt capital in recent years.

We believe that as a result of the aforementioned economic downturn and the subsequent banking regulatory reform, a number of lenders and finance companies who traditionally served the CRE middle-market, are burdened with legacy portfolio issues, balance sheet constraints or have otherwise exited the market. In particular, smaller and regional banks who represented a large portion of the CRE market prior to the downturn have sharply curtailed their CRE lending activities. We believe that this decreased competition will create a favorable investment environment for the foreseeable future. We also believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on the expected demand generated by the estimated $1.8 trillion of CRE debt maturing between 2012 and 2016 (as reported in Commercial Real Estate Outlook: Top Ten Issues in 2012 published by Deloitte & Touche LLP).

Results of Operations

We commenced operations on December 9, 2011 and completed our IPO on May 1, 2012. Therefore, we have no period to compare operating results for the three or six months ended June 30, 2012.  In addition, the proceeds of our IPO were used in part to fully repay all outstanding balances on our various secured financing agreements, including all accrued interest due, and to fully redeem all of our issued and outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”), including payment of all dividends due and applicable redemption premiums.  As a result, at June 30, 2012, we had no outstanding debt under our various secured financing agreements, no issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and $87,455 in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. We are currently in the process of investing the proceeds of our IPO. Results for the initial period of our operations are not indicative of the results we expect when our investment strategy has been fully implemented.

20

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, our net income (loss) attributable to our common stockholders was ($225) and ($341), respectively or ($0.03) and ($0.09) per basic and diluted common share, respectively.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we earned approximately $1,206 and $1,816, respectively in net interest margin.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, interest income of $1,559 and $2,508, respectively, was generated by average earning assets of $77.8 million and $62.1 million, respectively, offset by $353 and $692, respectively, of interest expense from average secured financing agreements of $15.6 million and $21.3 million, respectively.  We had lower overall average debt balances as we fully repaid the debt on May 1, 2012, using the proceeds of our IPO.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred expenses of $1,381 and $1,483, respectively.  Related party expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 include $419 and $419, respectively in management fees due to our Manager and $308 and $319, respectively for our share of allocable general and administrative expenses.  These expenses reflect the management contract that went into effect on May 1, 2012, the date of our IPO.  Also included in general and administrative expenses reimbursed to our Manager for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are $6 and $17, respectively, of servicing fees.  Servicing fees were charged to an affiliate of our Manager through May 1, 2012.  Other expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, includes professional fees of $331 and $414, respectively, and general and administrative expenses of $323 and $331, respectively.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we paid $50 and $102, respectively, in dividends to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock.  The Series A Preferred Stock was redeemed on May 1, 2012 using the proceeds of our IPO.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred $572 in accretion of redemption premium related to the Series A Preferred Stock.

21

Our investment portfolio is comprised of the following at June 30, 2012:

		Investment Information
		Our Total			Carrying		Funded		Origination	Maturity	Interest
Property Type	Location	Commitment			Value		Amount		Date	Date(1)	Rate
Stretch Senior Mortgage Loans
Boston CBD* Office Building: 12-story
office building (approximately
152,000 sq. ft.)	Boston MA	$	34,926	(2)	$	34,623	$	34,926	2/8/2012	3/1/2015	L+5.65%(3)
Transitional Senior Mortgage Loans
Austin Office Building: Two
properties consisting of four
low-rise office buildings (aggregate											L+5.75%-
of approximately 270,000 sq. ft.)	Austin TX	37,950			29,648		29,976		2/13/2012	3/1/2015	L+5.25%(4)
Denver Tech Center Office Building:
Low-rise office building
(approximately 173,000 sq. ft.)	Denver CO	11,000			6,031		6,123		12/29/2011	1/1/2015	L+5.50%(5)
Subordinated Debt Investments
Fort Lauderdale CBD* Office
Building: 28-story office building											L+10.75%-
(approximately 257,000 sq. ft.)	Ft. Lauderdale FL	15,000		(6)	7,871		8,000		1/27/2012	2/1/2015	L+8.18%(7)
Total		$	98,876		$	78,173	$	79,025

(1) The Boston loan is subject to one 12-month extension option. The Austin and Fort Lauderdale loans are subject to two 12-month extension options.

(2) This $35,000 loan was fully funded at origination. Subsequent to the initial funding through June 30, 2012, we received amortization payments on principal of $74, which reduced our total commitment and the funded amount accordingly.

(3) This loan was originated with a 1.0% origination fee, paid to us, and a 0.5% exit fee payable to us upon the earlier of repayment or the loan’s maturity. The interest rate for this loan is L+5.65% with the LIBOR component subject to a minimum rate of 0.65%.

(4) This loan was originated with a 1.0% origination fee, paid to us, and a 1.0% exit fee payable to us upon the earlier of repayment or the loan’s maturity. The initial interest rate for this loan of L+5.75% steps down based on performance hurdles to L+5.25%. The LIBOR component of the rate on this loan is subject to a minimum rate of 1.0%.

(5) This loan was originated with a 1.0% origination fee, paid to us, and a 1.0% exit fee payable to us upon the earlier of repayment or the loan’s maturity. The interest rate for this loan is L+5.50% with the LIBOR component subject to a minimum rate of 1.0%.

(6) The total commitment we co-originated was a $37,000 first mortgage, of which a $22,000 A-Note was fully funded by Citibank, N.A. We retained a $15,000 B-Note.

(7) This loan was originated with a 1.0% origination fee, paid to us, and a 0.5% exit fee payable to us upon the earlier of repayment or the loan’s maturity. The whole loan, consisting of the A-Note and our B-Note, was priced at L+5.25% on a cumulative basis with the LIBOR component subject to a minimum rate of 0.75%. The fully funded A-Note priced at L+3.25% (with the LIBOR component of the rate subject to a minimum rate of 0.75%) resulting in an interest rate on our B-Note at initial funding of $8,000 of L+10.75% (with the LIBOR component subject to a minimum rate of 0.75%). Upon the B-Note becoming fully funded at $15,000, its effective interest rate will decrease to L+8.18% (with the LIBOR component subject to a minimum rate of 0.75%).

* Central Business District

22

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain our assets and operations, make distributions to our stockholders and meet other general business needs. We will use significant cash to purchase our target investments, repay principal and pay interest on our borrowings, make distributions to our stockholders and fund our operations, including base management fees, incentive management fees and reimbursements for expenses for our share of overhead expense incurred by our Manager. Our primary sources of cash will generally consist of unused borrowing capacity under our financing sources, the net proceeds of future offerings, payments of principal and interest we receive on our portfolio of assets and cash generated from our operating results. We expect that our primary sources of financing will be, to the extent available to us, through (a) credit facilities, (b) securitizations, (c) other sources of private financing, including warehouse and repurchase facilities and (d) public offerings of our equity or debt securities. In the future, we may utilize other sources of financing to the extent available to us.

Secured Financing Arrangements

The sources of financing for our target investments are described below.

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
(dollar amounts in millions)	Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment		Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment
Wells Fargo Facility	$	—	$	172.5	$	—	$	75.0
Citibank Facility	—		86.2		—		50.0
Capital One Facility	—		50.0		—		—
Total	$	—	$	308.7	$	—	$	125.0

The secured financing arrangements are generally collateralized by assignments of specific loans held for investment originated by us.  The secured financing arrangements are guaranteed by the Company.

Generally, the Company partially offsets interest rate risk by matching the interest index of loans held for investments with the secured financing agreement used to fund them.

Wells Fargo Facility

On December 14, 2011, we entered into a $75 million secured revolving funding facility arranged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Wells Fargo Facility”), pursuant to which we may borrow funds to originate qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes.

Advances under the Wells Fargo Facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to the sum of (i) 30 day LIBOR plus (ii) a pricing margin range of 2.50% - 2.75%. Starting May 15, 2012, we incur a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Wells Fargo Facility. The initial maturity date of the Wells Fargo Facility is December 14, 2014, subject to two 12-month extension options.

On May 22, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum availability under the Wells Fargo Facility, subject to available collateral, from $75 million to $172.5 million.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Wells Fargo Facility was zero.

Citibank Facility

On December 8, 2011, we entered into a $50 million secured revolving funding facility arranged by Citibank, N.A. (the “Citibank Facility”), pursuant to which we may borrow funds to originate qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes.

Under the Citibank Facility, we may borrow funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans (each, an “Individual Loan”).  Each Individual Loan will be secured by an underlying loan originated by us.  Amounts outstanding under each Individual Loan will accrue interest at a per annum rate based on LIBOR. The margin can vary between 3.25% and 4.00% over the greater of LIBOR and 1.0%, based on the debt yield of the assets contributed into Lender C.  Effective March 3, 2012, we began incurring a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Citibank Facility.  The maturity date of each Individual Loan will be the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such Individual Loan.

23

On April 16, 2012 and May 1, 2012, the agreements governing the Citibank Facility were amended to, among other things,  increase the maximum availability under the Citibank Facility from $50 million to $86.2 million.  The end of the funding period was automatically extended to December 8, 2013 upon the completion of the IPO, and may be further extended for an additional 12 months upon the payment of the applicable extension fee and provided that no event of default is then occurring.   The completion of the IPO triggered a modification of the interest rate margin to a range of 2.50% -3.50% over the greater of LIBOR and 0.5%. As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Citibank Facility was zero.

Capital One Facility

On May 18, 2012, we entered into a $50 million secured revolving funding facility (the “Capital One Facility”) with Capital One, National Association (“Capital One”), as lender and the Company, as guarantor.  The Capital One Facility will be used for originating qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans.  Under the Capital One Facility, we may borrow funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans evidenced by individual notes (each, an “Individual Loan”).  Each Individual Loan will be secured by an underlying loan originated by us.  Amounts outstanding under each Individual Loan will accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread ranging between 2.50% and 4.00%.  We may request Individual Loans under the Capital One Facility through and including May 18, 2014, subject to successive 12-month extension options at Capital One’s discretion.  The maturity date of each Individual Loan will be the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such Individual Loan.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Capital One Facility was zero.

Debt Covenants

The Wells Fargo Facility, Citibank Facility and Capital One Facility contain various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that require us or certain subsidiaries as guarantor or borrower to maintain minimum tangible net worth, liquidity levels and financial ratios, as defined in the respective agreements.

Effective June 29, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to provide that the required minimum fixed charge coverage ratio with respect to the Company as guarantor will start to be tested upon the earlier to occur of (i) the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2013 and (ii) the first full calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which the Company reports “Loans held for investment” in excess of $200 million on its quarterly consolidated balance sheets.  

Other Credit Facilities, Warehouse Facilities and Repurchase Agreements

In the future, we may also use other sources of financing to fund the origination or acquisition of our target investments, including other credit facilities, warehouse facilities, repurchase facilities and other secured and unsecured forms of borrowing. These financings may be collateralized or non-collateralized and may involve one or more lenders. We expect that these facilities will typically have maturities ranging from two to five years and may accrue interest at either fixed or floating rates.

Equity Issuances

The following summarizes the total shares issued and proceeds we received in private and underwritten public offerings of our common stock net of offering costs for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

On January 25, 2012, we entered into a subscription agreement with Ares Investment Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of ACREM, (“AIH”), whereby AIH agreed to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of $8,000, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.

On February 6, 2012, we entered into a subscription agreement with AIH, whereby AIH agreed to purchase 770,000 shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of $15,400, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.

On February 8, 2012, the charter of the Company was amended and restated to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock and preferred stock to 95,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares, respectively. The par value remained at $0.01 per share.

On February 22, 2012, our board of directors and AIH approved a one-for-two reverse stock split whereby every two shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to this date were changed into one issued and outstanding share of our common stock.

24

On May 1, 2012, the Company completed its IPO of 7,700,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $18.50 per share, raising $142,450 in gross proceeds.  Underwriting commissions of $5,328 are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.  Under the underwriting agreement, our Manager was responsible for and paid directly the underwriting commissions.  Because the Manager is a related party, the payment of underwriting commissions of $5,328 by our Manager is reflected as a contribution of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity in accordance with GAAP.  The Company incurred approximately $3,350 of expenses in connection with the IPO, which is reflected as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The net proceeds to the Company totaled approximately $139,100. The Company used approximately $47,300 of the net proceeds of the IPO to repay outstanding amounts under the Wells Fargo Facility and the Citibank Facility and $6,295 to redeem all of its issued shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  The balance will be used for general corporate working capital purposes and to make investments in our target investments. Until appropriate investments can be identified, we may invest this balance in interest-bearing short-term investments, including money market accounts or funds, and CMBS or corporate bonds, which are consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT.

Capital Markets

We may seek to raise further equity capital and issue debt securities in order to fund our future investments. For example, we may seek to enhance the returns on our senior commercial mortgage loan investments, especially loan originations, through securitizations, if available. To the extent available, we intend to securitize the senior portion of some of our loans, while retaining the subordinate securities in our investment portfolio. The securitization of this senior portion will be accounted for as either a “sale” and the loans will be removed from our balance sheet or as a “financing” and will be classified as “securitized loans” on our balance sheet, depending upon the structure of the securitization. To the extent investors purchase future stock issuances at a price lower than the IPO price, shareholders may experience dilution to the extent of the difference between the future offering price per share and the net tangible book value per share.

Leverage Policies

We intend to use prudent amounts of leverage to increase potential returns to our stockholders. To that end, subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT and our exemption from registration under the 1940 Act, we intend to use borrowings to fund the origination or acquisition of our target investments. Given current market conditions and our focus on first or senior mortgages, we currently expect that such leverage would not exceed, on a debt-to-equity basis, a 4-to-1 ratio. The amount of leverage we will deploy for particular investments in our target investments will depend upon our Manager’s assessment of a variety of factors, which may include, among others, the anticipated liquidity and price volatility of the assets in our investment portfolio, the potential for losses and extension risk in our portfolio, the gap between the duration of our assets and liabilities, including hedges, the availability and cost of financing the assets, our opinion of the creditworthiness of our financing counterparties, the health of the U.S. economy and commercial mortgage markets, our outlook for the level and volatility of interest rates, the slope of the yield curve, the credit quality of our assets, the collateral underlying our assets, and our outlook for asset spreads relative to the LIBOR curve.

Dividends

We intend to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates on that portion to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income. We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends to our stockholders in an amount equal to or greater than our net taxable income, if and to the extent authorized by our board of directors. Before we pay any dividend, whether for U.S. federal income tax purposes or otherwise, we must first meet both our operating requirements and debt service on our secured financing facilities, other lending facilities, repurchase agreements and other debt payable. If our cash available for distribution is less than our net taxable income, we could be required to sell assets or borrow funds to make cash distributions or we may make a portion of the required distribution in the form of a taxable stock distribution or distribution of debt securities. In addition, prior to the time we have fully deployed the net proceeds of this offering to directly originate our target investments, we may fund our dividend distributions out of such net proceeds.

25

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Contractual obligations as of June 30, 2012:

	Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Secured Financing, including interest payable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Future Loan Funding Commitments	19,851		—		19,851		—		—
Total	$	19,851	$	—	$	19,851	$	—	$	—

We may enter into certain contracts that may contain a variety of indemnification obligations, principally with underwriters and counterparties to repurchase agreements. The maximum potential future payment amount we could be required to pay under these indemnification obligations may be unlimited.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured investment vehicles, special purpose entities or VIEs, established to facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities or entered into any commitment or intent to provide additional funding to any such entities.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Core Earnings is a measure not prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and is defined as GAAP net income (loss) excluding non-cash equity compensation expense, the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization (related to targeted investments that are structured as debt to the extent that we foreclose on any properties underlying our target investments), any unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items that are included in net income for the applicable reporting period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income. The amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between our Manager and our independent directors and after approval by a majority of our independent directors.

We believe that Core Earnings provides an additional measure of our core operating performance by eliminating the impact of certain non-cash expenses and facilitating a comparison of our financial results to those of other comparable companies with fewer or no non-cash charges and comparison of our own operating results from period to period. Our management uses Core Earnings in this way, and also uses Core Earnings to compute the incentive fee due under our Management Agreement. We believe that our investors also use Core Earnings or a comparable supplemental performance measure to evaluate and compare our performance and our peers, and as such, we believe that the disclosure of Core Earnings is useful to our investors.

However, we caution that Core Earnings does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), or an indication of our cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP), a measure of our liquidity, or an indication of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, our methodology for calculating Core Earnings may differ from the methodologies employed by other companies to calculate the same or similar supplemental performance measures, and accordingly, our reported Core Earnings may not be comparable to the Core Earnings reported by other companies.

26

Our Core Earnings (Loss) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 were approximately ($158) and ($274), respectively, or ($0.02) and ($0.07) per weighted average share, diluted. The table below provides a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Core Earnings for this period:

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012			For the six months ended June 30, 2012
Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(225	)	(341	)
Add back: non-cash stock-based compensation	67			67
Core Earnings (Loss)	$	(158	)	(274	)

Recent Developments

On July 9, 2012, the Company appointed Tae-Sik Yoon as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, replacing Richard S. Davis, who served in the same capacity on an interim basis.  As the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Yoon also replaces Mr. Davis as a member of ACREM’s Investment Committee.

On July 9, 2012, Tae-Sik Yoon was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a four-year period.

On August 2, 2012, we originated a $14,300 mezzanine loan collateralized by interests on an office building located in Atlanta, GA. The loan was fully funded at closing; net of fees, the carrying amount is $14,157.  The initial effective yield on the mezzanine loan is 10.7%.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions that involve the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties. In accordance with SEC guidance, the following discussion addresses the accounting policies that we believe apply to us based on the nature of our initial operations. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and assessments that could affect our reported assets and liabilities, as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all of the decisions and assessments used to draft our financial statements are based upon reasonable assumptions given the information available to us at that time. Our critical accounting policies and accounting estimates will be expanded over time as we fully implement our strategy. Those accounting policies and estimates that we believe are most critical to an investor’s understanding of our financial results and condition and require complex management judgment are discussed below.  Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

Loans Held for Investment and Interest Income Recognition

Our originated loans receivable will be classified as held-for-investment based upon our intent and ability to hold them until maturity. Loans that are held-for-investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan fees, and origination and acquisition costs, unless the loan is deemed impaired. Interest income will be recognized based on the contractual rate and the outstanding principal balance of the loans. Origination fees, contractual exit fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method. The objective of the effective interest method is to arrive at periodic interest income that yields a level rate of return over the original loan term inclusive of origination points and other fees.

We will evaluate each loan classified as held for investment for impairment on a periodic basis. Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, we will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate or the fair value of the collateral, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Our loans are collateralized by real estate. As a result, we will regularly evaluate the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower.  The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology: (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower’s ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity; (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective.  Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower’s exit plan, among other factors.

27

Significant judgment will be required in determining impairment, including making assumptions regarding the value of a loan or loan pool, the value of the underlying collateral and other provisions such as guarantees.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs.  The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are cash and cash equivalents. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment and secured financing agreements. Such financial instruments are carried at cost.  For loans held for investment which are evaluated for impairment at least quarterly, we estimate the fair value of the financial instrument.  If an impairment is determined, we record an expense for the difference between fair value and the carrying cost of the financial instrument.  As of June 30, 2012, the fair value of our financial instruments approximates cost.

The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.

Level 3 — Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.

Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. We anticipate that a significant portion of our assets will fall in Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy.

Any changes to the valuation methodology will be reviewed by management to ensure the changes are appropriate. As markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, we will continue to refine our valuation methodologies. The methods used by us may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we anticipate that our valuation methods will be appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. We will use inputs that are current as of the measurement date, which may include periods of market dislocation, during which price transparency may be reduced.

Income Taxes

Our financial results are generally not expected to reflect provisions for current or deferred income taxes. We believe that we will operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of our expected REIT qualification, we do not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level taxes. Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed REIT taxable income.

28

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance that revises the criteria for assessing effective control for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, and the amendment is to be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. We adopted this new guidance beginning with the first quarter 2012 interim financial statements. This standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance to achieve common fair value and disclosure requirements under GAAP. The new guidance amends current fair value guidance to include increased transparency around valuation inputs and investment categorization. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this new guidance beginning with the first quarter 2012 interim financial statements. This standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We seek to manage our risks related to the credit quality of our assets, interest rates, liquidity, prepayment speeds and market value while, at the same time, seeking to provide an opportunity to stockholders to realize attractive risk-adjusted returns through ownership of our capital stock. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we believe the risks can be quantified from historical experience and seek to actively manage those risks, to earn sufficient compensation to justify taking those risks and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake.

Credit Risk

We expect to be subject to varying degrees of credit risk in connection with holding a portfolio of our target investments. We will have exposure to credit risk on our CRE loans and other target investments. Our Manager will seek to manage credit risk by performing credit fundamental analysis of potential collateral assets. Credit risk will also be addressed through our Manager’s on-going review.

Our investment guidelines do not limit the amount of our equity that may be invested in any type of our target investments. Our investment decisions will depend on prevailing market conditions and may change over time in response to opportunities available in different interest rate, economic and credit environments. As a result, we cannot predict the percentage of our equity that will be invested in any individual target investment at any given time.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including fiscal and monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political considerations, as well as other factors beyond our control. We will be subject to interest rate risk in connection with our assets and our related financing obligations. In general, we expect to finance the origination or acquisition of our target investments through financings in the form of borrowings under warehouse facilities, bank credit facilities (including term loans and revolving facilities), resecuritizations, securitizations and repurchase agreements. We may mitigate interest rate risk through utilization of hedging instruments, primarily interest rate swap agreements. Interest rate swap agreements are intended to serve as a hedge against future interest rate increases on our borrowings. For many of our investments, we may also seek to limit the exposure of our borrowers and sponsors to future fluctuations of interest rates through their use of interest-rate caps and other interest rate hedging instruments.

We regularly measure our exposure to interest rate risk. We assess interest rate risk and manage our interest rate exposure on an ongoing basis by comparing our interest rate sensitive assets to our interest rate sensitive liabilities. Based on that review, we determine whether or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates.

While hedging activities may mitigate our exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates, certain hedging transactions that we may enter into in the future, such as interest rate swap agreements, may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio investments. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively hedge our interest rate risk.

29

Interest Rate Effect on Net Interest Income

Our operating results will depend in large part on differences between the income earned on our assets and our cost of borrowing and hedging activities. The cost of our borrowings generally will be based on prevailing market interest rates. During a period of rising interest rates, our borrowing costs generally will increase (a) while the yields earned on our leveraged fixed-rate mortgage assets will remain static and (b) in some cases, at a faster pace than the yields earned on our leveraged floating rate mortgage assets, which could result in a decline in our net interest spread and net interest margin. The severity of any such decline would depend on our asset/liability composition at the time as well as the magnitude and duration of the interest rate increase. Further, an increase in short-term interest rates could also have a negative impact on the market value of our target investments. If any of these events happen, we could experience a decrease in net income or incur a net loss during these periods, which could adversely affect our liquidity and results of operations.

Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our target investments. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the investment will be longer or shorter, which would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex and may produce volatile returns.

Interest Rate Cap Risk

We may originate or acquire floating rate mortgage assets. These are assets in which the mortgages may be subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors, which limit the amount by which the asset’s interest yield may change during any given period. However, our borrowing costs pursuant to our financing agreements will not be subject to similar restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates, interest rate costs on our borrowings could increase without limitation by caps, while the interest-rate yields on our floating rate mortgage assets would effectively be limited. In addition, floating rate mortgage assets may be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. This could result in our receipt of less cash income on such assets than we would need to pay the interest cost on our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net interest income or cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would harm our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Interest Rate Mismatch Risk

We may fund a portion of our origination or acquisition of mortgage loans with borrowings that are based on LIBOR, while the interest rates on these assets may be indexed to LIBOR or another index rate, such as the one-year Constant Maturity Treasury, or “CMT”, index, the Monthly Treasury Average, or “MTA”, index or the 11th District Cost of Funds Index, or “COFI.” Accordingly, any increase in LIBOR relative to one-year CMT rates, MTA or COFI will generally result in an increase in our borrowing costs that may not be matched by a corresponding increase in the interest earnings on these assets. Any such interest rate index mismatch could adversely affect our profitability, which may negatively impact distributions to our stockholders. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we may utilize the hedging strategies discussed above.

Our analysis of risks is based on our Manager’s experience, estimates, models and assumptions. These analyses rely on models which utilize estimates of fair value and interest rate sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or implementation of decisions by our management may produce results that differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used in our models and the projected results.

Extension Risk

Our Manager will compute the projected weighted-average life of our assets based on assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay the mortgages. If prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate environment, the life of the fixed-rate assets could extend beyond the term of the interest swap agreement or other hedging instrument. This could have a negative impact on our results from operations, as borrowing costs would no longer be fixed after the end of the hedging instrument while the income earned on the fixed-rate assets would remain fixed. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to maintain adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur losses.

Market Risk

Available-for-sale investments will be reflected at their estimated fair value, with the difference between amortized cost and estimated fair value reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. The estimated fair value of these investments fluctuates primarily due to changes in interest rates and other factors. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of the fixed-rate securities would be expected to decrease; conversely, in a decreasing interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of the fixed-rate securities would be expected to increase. As market volatility increases or liquidity decreases, the fair value of our investments may be adversely impacted. If we are unable to readily obtain independent pricing to validate our estimated fair value of any available-for-sale investment in our portfolio, the fair value gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive income may be adversely affected.

30

Real Estate Risk

Commercial mortgage assets are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions; changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; and retroactive changes to building or similar codes. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay the underlying loan or loans, as the case may be, which could also cause us to suffer losses.

Inflation

Virtually all of the Company’s assets and liabilities will be sensitive to interest rates. As a result, interest rates and other factors influence the Company’s performance far more so than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates.  In each case, in general, the Company’s activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost and/or fair market value without considering inflation.

Risk Management

To the extent consistent with maintaining our REIT qualification, we will seek to manage risk exposure by closely monitoring our portfolio and actively managing the financing, interest rate, credit, prepayment and convexity (a measure of the sensitivity of the duration of a debt investment to changes in interest rates) risks associated with holding a portfolio of our target investments. Generally, with the guidance and experience of our Manager:

·we will manage our portfolio through an interactive process with Ares Management and service our self-originated investments through our Manager’s servicer, which is a Standard & Poor’s-ranked commercial primary servicer and commercial special servicer that is included on S&P’s Select Servicer List;

·we intend to engage in a variety of interest rate management techniques that seek, on the one hand to mitigate the economic effect of interest rate changes on the values of, and returns on, some of our assets, and on the other hand help us achieve our risk management objectives, including utilizing derivative financial instruments, such as puts and calls on securities or indices of securities, interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, exchange-traded derivatives, U.S. Treasury securities, options on U.S. Treasury securities and interest rate floors to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with the financing of our portfolio;

·we intend to actively employ portfolio-wide and asset-specific risk measurement and management processes in our daily operations, including utilizing our Manager’s risk management tools such as software and services licensed or purchased from third parties and proprietary analytical methods developed by Ares Management; and

·we will seek to manage credit risk through our due diligence process prior to origination or acquisition and through the use of non-recourse financing, when and where available and appropriate. In addition, with respect to any particular target investment, our Manager’s investment team evaluates, among other things, relative valuation, comparable analysis, supply and demand trends, shape of yield curves, delinquency and default rates, recovery of various sectors and vintage of collateral.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them of material information relating to the Company that is required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we may be subject to various legal proceedings from time to time. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with our loans held for investment. Currently, we are not aware of any legal proceedings pending against us or any of our subsidiaries.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our Prospectus and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks in our Prospectus and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities

We did not sell any equity securities during the period covered in this report that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

On April 25, 2012, the SEC declared effective our registration statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act (File No. 333-176841) relating to our IPO of our common stock. A total of 7,700,000 shares of our common stock were registered, and all shares were sold upon the completion of the offering on May 1, 2012, of which 500,000 shares were purchased by AIH at the IPO price of $18.50 per share.  As of June 30, 2012, AIH owned 2,000,000 shares or 21.6% of the total common shares outstanding.  The net proceeds to the Company totaled approximately $139.1 million.

The Company used approximately $47.3 million of the net proceeds of the IPO to repay outstanding amounts under the Wells Fargo Facility and the Citibank Facility and approximately $6.3 million to redeem all of the Company’s issued shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  The balance will be used for general corporate working capital purposes and to originate our target investments. Until appropriate investments can be identified, the Company may invest this balance in interest-bearing short-term investments, including money market accounts or funds, CMBS or corporate bonds, which are consistent with our intention to qualify as a real estate investment trust.  There has been no material change in the Company’s planned use of proceeds from the IPO, as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.  Other Information

None.

32

Item 6.  Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description
3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (1)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (1)
10.1	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (2)
10.2	Form of Indemnification Agreement with directors and certain officers (3)
10.3	Form of Indemnification Agreement with members of the Investment Committee and/or Underwriting Committee of Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC (3)
10.4	2012 Equity Incentive Plan (1)
10.5	First Amendment to Master Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2012, between ACRC Lender C LLC, as borrower, and Citibank, N.A., as lender (4)
10.6	Amended and Restated Note, dated as of April 16, 2012, between ACRC Lender C LLC, as borrower, for the benefit of Citibank, N.A., as lender (4)
10.7	Substitute Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2012, by Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation, as guarantor, in favor of Citibank, N.A., as lender (3)
10.8	Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 25, 2012, between Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation and Ares Investments Holdings LLC (3)
10.9	Management Agreement, dated April 25, 2012, between Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC and Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (3)
10.10	Trademark License Agreement, dated April 25, 2012, between Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation and Ares Management LLC (3)
10.11	Master Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated May 18, 2012, among ACRC Lender One LLC, as borrower, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation, as guarantor, and Capital One, National Association, as lender (5)
10.12	Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2012, by Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation, as guarantor, for the benefit of Capital One, National Association, as lender (5)
10.13	Amendment No. 1 to the Master Repurchase and Securities Contract, dated as of May 22, 2012, among ACRC Lender W LLC, as seller, ACRC Holdings LLC, as original guarantor, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation, as new guarantor and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as buyer (5)
10.14	Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2012, by Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation, as guarantor, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as bank (5)
10.15*	Amendment No. 1 to Guarantee Agreement dated effective as of June 29, 2012, between Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation, as guarantor and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as beneficiary, and acknowledged by ACRC Lender W LLC, as seller
31.1*	Certification of President pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*	Certification of President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*    Filed herewith
**	These interactive data files are furnished and not deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, and are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 10.1, as applicable, to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-181077), filed on May 1, 2012.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Amendment No. 3 to Form S-11 (File No. 333-176841), filed on April 12, 2012.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5 and 10.6 as applicable to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-35517 ), filed on May 4, 2012.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.9 and 10.17 as applicable, to the Company’s Registration Statement on Amendment No. 5 to Form S-11 (File No. 333-176841), filed on April 20, 2012.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 as applicable to the Company’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-35517 ), filed on May 24, 2012.

33

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Dated: August 14, 2012	By	/s/ John B. Bartling, Jr.
		John B. Bartling, Jr.
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: August 14, 2012	By	/s/ Tae-Sik Yoon
		Tae-Sik Yoon
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

34

EX-10.15

Exhibit 10.15

EXECUTION COPY

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO GUARANTEE AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO GUARANTEE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated effective as of June 29, 2012 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), made by ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation (“Guarantor”) having its principal place of business c/o Ares Management LLC, 2 North LaSalle Street, 9th Floor, Chicago, IL 60602, in favor of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (“Buyer”) and any of its parent, subsidiary or affiliated companies (collectively, “Beneficiary”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Master Repurchase and Securities Contract, dated as of December 14, 2011 (the “Original Repurchase Agreement”) between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (as “Buyer”) and ACRC Lender W LLC (“Seller”), as amended pursuant to Amendment No. 1 to Master Repurchase and Securities Contract between Buyer, Guarantor, ACRC Holdings LLC (as Original Guarantor) and Seller dated April 22, 2012 (the “First Amendment”; together with the Original Repurchase Agreement, as further amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Repurchase Agreement”), Seller agreed to sell, from time to time, to Buyer certain Whole Loans and Senior Interests, each as defined in the Repurchase Agreement (collectively, the “Purchased Assets”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions as set forth therein;

WHEREAS, in connection with the execution and delivery by the parties thereto of the First Amendment, Guarantor executed and delivered to Buyer a Guarantee Agreement dated as of May 22, 2012 (the “Guarantee”); and

WHEREAS, Buyer and Guarantor have agreed to amend certain provisions of the Guarantee as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor hereby agrees with Buyer as follows:

1.             Amendment to Guaranty.

(a)           Section 9(c) of the Guaranty is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

(b)           Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio.  Commencing on the earlier to occur of (i) the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2013, and (ii) the first full calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which Guarantor reports “Loans held for investment” in excess of $200,000,000.00 on its quarterly consolidated balance sheets, Guarantor shall not permit its Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for any Test Period to be less than 1.50 to 1.00, with compliance to be tested as of the end of each Test Period.

2.             Limited Effect.  Except as expressly amended and modified by this Amendment, the Guarantee shall continue to be, and shall remain, in full force and effect in accordance with its terms; provided, however, that upon the Amendment Effective Date, each (a) reference to the “Guarantee” in any of the Repurchase Documents shall be deemed to be a reference to the Guarantee as amended hereby, and (b) each reference in the Guarantee to “this Agreement”, this “Guarantee”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of similar effect in referring to the Guarantee shall be deemed to be references to the Guarantee as amended by this Amendment.

3.             Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed by each of the parties hereto on any number of separate counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment in Portable Document Format (PDF) or by facsimile transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed original counterpart thereof.

4.             Paragraph Headings.  The paragraph headings used in this Guarantee are for convenience of reference only and are not to affect the construction hereof or be taken into consideration in the interpretation hereof.

5.             Governing Law.  THIS AMENDMENT AND ANY CLAIM, CONTROVERSY OR DISPUTE ARISING UNDER OR RELATED TO OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS GUARANTEE, THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES, AND/OR THE INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PARTIES WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES OTHER THAN SECTION 5-1401 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW.

[SIGNATURES COMMENCE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to Guarantee Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

			Guarantor:
			ARES COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation
			By:	/s/ Timothy B. Smith
				Name:	Timothy B. Smith
				Title:	Vice President
			Beneficiary:
			WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national banking association
			By:	/s/ John Nelson
				Name:	John Nelson
				Title:	Managing Director
Acknowledged and Agreed to by:
Seller:
ACRC LENDER W LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:	/s/ Timothy B. Smith
	Name:	Timothy B. Smith
	Title:	Vice President

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I, John B. Bartling, Jr., certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)[Omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)]

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2012

/s/ John B. Bartling, Jr.

John B. Bartling, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Tae-Sik Yoon, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)[Omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)]

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2012

/s/ Tae-Sik Yoon

Tae-Sik Yoon

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), John B. Bartling, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Tae-Sik Yoon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2012

/s/ John B. Bartling, Jr.

John B. Bartling, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Tae-Sik Yoon

Tae-Sik Yoon

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation and will be retained by Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net loss attributable to common stockholders (in dollars)	$ (225)	$ (341)
Divided by:
Weighted average shares of common stock - outstanding - diluted:	6,576,923	3,787,747
Weighted average shares of common stock - outstanding - basic:	6,576,923	3,787,747
Basic and diluted earnings per common share (in dollars per share)	$ (0.03)	$ (0.09)

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Summary of related-party costs incurred by the Company and amounts payable to the Manager

	Incurred			Payable as of
	Three months ended June 30, 2012		Six months ended June 30, 2012	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Affiliate Payments
Management fees	$	419	419	$	419	—
Servicing fees	6		17	6		—
General and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate	302		302	302		—
Direct third party costs paid by Manager to be reimbursed by the Company
Deferred financing costs	46		149	46		621
Offering costs	41		298	41		—
Other assets	32		47	32		196
General and administrative expenses	44		87	44		10
	$	890	1,319	$	890	827

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with GAAP, and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s results of the operations and financial condition as of and for the periods presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include funds on deposit with financial institutions.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes escrows for taxes, insurance, leasing outlays, capital expenditures, tenant security deposits, and payments required under certain loan agreements.  These escrow deposits are held on behalf of the respective borrowers and are offset by an escrow cash liability included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit.

Loans Held for Investment

The Company originates commercial real estate debt and related instruments generally to be held for investment and to maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan fees and origination costs, unless the loans are deemed impaired.

Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, the Company will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate.

Each loan classified as held for investment is evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis.  Loans are collateralized by real estate and as a result, the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower could impact the expected amounts received and are therefore regularly evaluated. The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower’s ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity; (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective.  Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower’s exit plan, among other factors.

Underwriting Commissions and Offering Costs

Underwriting commissions and offering costs incurred in connection with common stock offerings will be reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred that are not directly associated with the completion of a common stock offering will be expensed. Underwriting commissions that are the responsibility of and paid by a related party, such as our Manager, are reflected as a contribution of additional paid in capital from a sponsor in the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Interest income is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount and the contractual terms of each loan. Origination fees, contractual exit fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the initial loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective credit facilities. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $304 and $39 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs.  The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are cash and cash equivalents. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment and secured financing agreements. Such financial instruments are carried at cost.  Fair value is separately disclosed (see Note 9).  The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.

Level 3 — Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company recognizes the cost of stock based compensation and payment transactions using the same expense category as would be charged for payments in cash. The fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the award, with an offsetting increase in stockholders’ equity. For grants to directors and officers, the fair value is determined based upon the market price of the stock on the grant date.

Earnings per Share

The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for that period after consideration of the earnings allocated to our restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are participating securities as defined in GAAP.  Diluted earnings per share takes into effect any dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units, except when doing so would be anti-dilutive.

Income Taxes

The Company believes that it will operate in a manner that will allow it to qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of the Company’s expected REIT qualification, the Company does not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level taxes. Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute annually at least 90% of the Company’s taxable income to the Company’s stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the Company’s subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes on the Company’s income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on the Company’s undistributed REIT taxable income.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of investments.

Segment Reporting

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company operated in one business segment.  The Company is primarily engaged in originating, investing in and managing commercial mortgage loans and other commercial real estate-related debt investments.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Repurchase Agreements—In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance that revises the criteria for assessing effective control for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, and the amendment is to be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations or cash flows.

Fair Value Measurement—In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements under GAAP. The new guidance amends current fair value guidance to include increased transparency around valuation inputs and investment categorization. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.
Total commitments	$ 98,876	$ 11,000
Less: funded commitments	(79,025)	(5,055)
Total unfunded commitments	$ 19,851	$ 5,945

XML

SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS (Details) (USD $)					6 Months Ended						6 Months Ended			6 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012 Wells Fargo Facility	Dec. 31, 2011 Wells Fargo Facility	Jun. 30, 2012 Wells Fargo Facility Secured revolving funding facility item	Jun. 30, 2012 Wells Fargo Facility Secured revolving funding facility Minimum	Jun. 29, 2012 Wells Fargo Facility Secured revolving funding facility Minimum	Jun. 30, 2012 Wells Fargo Facility Secured revolving funding facility Maximum	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility	Dec. 31, 2011 Citibank Facility	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility Prior revolving credit facility	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility Prior revolving credit facility Minimum	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility Prior revolving credit facility Maximum	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility Secured revolving funding facility	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility Secured revolving funding facility Minimum	Jun. 30, 2012 Citibank Facility Secured revolving funding facility Maximum	Jun. 30, 2012 Capital One Facility	Jun. 30, 2012 Capital One Facility Secured funding facility	Jun. 30, 2012 Capital One Facility Secured funding facility Minimum	Jun. 30, 2012 Capital One Facility Secured funding facility Maximum
Secured financing agreements
Total Commitment	$ 308,675,000	$ 125,000,000	$ 172,450,000	$ 75,000,000					$ 86,225,000	$ 50,000,000							$ 50,000,000
Variable interest basis					30 day LIBOR						LIBOR			LIBOR				LIBOR
Interest rate margin (as a percent)						2.50%		2.75%				3.25%	4.00%		2.50%	3.50%			2.50%	4.00%
Variable interest rate floor (as a percent)											1.00%			0.50%
Non-utilization fee on average available balance (as a percent)					0.25%						0.25%
Number of extension periods available for maturity date					2
Extension period of maturity date					12 months									12 months				12 months
Outstanding Balance					0									0				0
Value of loans held for investment which are used to establish compliance with the required minimum fixed charge ratio with respect to the Entity as guarantor.							$ 200,000,000

XML

SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended		1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended			1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	May 01, 2012	Apr. 30, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock	Jun. 30, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock	May 31, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock	Feb. 08, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock	Feb. 29, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock Maximum	Jun. 30, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock Issue date through December 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014	Jun. 30, 2012 Series A Preferred Stock January 1, 2015 and thereafter
Series A convertible preferred stock
Authorized preferred stock classified as shares							600
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)							$ 0.01
Prevailing Dividend Rate (as a percent)									10.00%	11.00%	12.00%	13.00%
Commitments to purchase shares of preferred stock by third party investors								475
Purchase commitment price (in dollars per share)			$ 18.50				$ 50,000
Cash dividend paid on preferred stock	$ 50	$ 102		$ 52
Redemption price of preferred stock						6,295
Percentage added to calculate redemption price					10.00%
Cash dividend paid on common stock		1,005
Preferred stock shares issued					114.4578
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		5,723			5,723
Accretion of redemption premium		(572)			572
Value of preferred stock shares issued					$ 6,295

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended				1 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	May 01, 2012	Feb. 08, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Feb. 29, 2012 AIH item	Jan. 31, 2012 AIH	Dec. 31, 2011 AIH
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Amount contributed for issuance of shares								$ 6,600
Shares issued upon increase in authorized common stock								330,000
Common shares sold in a private placement						770,000	400,000
Total purchase price						15,400	8,000
Common stock, shares authorized		95,000,000		95,000,000	100,000
Preferred stock, shares authorized		5,000,000		5,000,000	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)		$ 0.01		$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)		$ 0.01		$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Reverse stock split						0.5
Common shares issued	7,700,000
Common stock price (in dollars per share)			$ 18.50
Gross proceeds from the IPO	142,450
Underwriting commissions incurred	5,328
IPO expenses	3,350	3,016
Net proceeds from the IPO	139,100
Repayment of outstanding facilities	47,300	47,277
Redemption of Series A preferred stock	$ 6,295	$ 6,295

XML

ORGANIZATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION

1.ORGANIZATION

Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (the “Company,” “ACRE,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated on September 1, 2011, and was initially funded and commenced investment operations on December 9, 2011. The Company is focused primarily on originating, investing in and managing middle-market commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans and other CRE-related investments.  ACRE completed its initial public offering on May 1, 2012 (the “IPO”). The Company is externally managed by Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC (“ACREM” or our “Manager”), a Securities and Exchange Commission registered investment adviser and a wholly owned subsidiary of Ares Management LLC, a global alternative asset manager and also a registered investment adviser.

The Company’s target investments include: “transitional senior” mortgage loans, “stretch senior” mortgage loans, subordinate debt mortgage loans such as B-notes and mezzanine loans and other select commercial real estate debt and preferred equity investments.  “Transitional senior” mortgage loans provide strategic, flexible, short-term financing solutions on transitional CRE middle-market assets that are the subject of a business plan that is expected to enhance the value of the property, are usually funded over time as the borrower’s business plan for the property is executed and have a lower initial loan-to-value ratio as compared to “stretch senior” mortgage loans, with the loan-to-value ratios increasing as the loan is further funded over time.  “Stretch senior” mortgage loans provide flexible “one stop” financing on quality CRE middle-market assets that are typically stabilized or near-stabilized properties with healthy balance sheets and steady cash flows, with the mortgage loans having higher leverage (and thus higher loan-to-value ratios) than conventional mortgage loans and are typically fully funded at closing and non-recourse to the borrower (as compared to conventional mortgage loans, which are usually full recourse to the borrower).

The Company intends to elect and qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with the Company’s taxable year ending December 31, 2012. The Company generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on the Company’s taxable income to the extent that the Company annually distributes 90% or more of our taxable income to stockholders and complies with various other requirements as a REIT.

Interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Articles 6 or 10 of Regulation S-X. The current period’s results of operations will not necessarily be indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details 2)	6 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		1 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Apr. 23, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012 Restricted stock	Jun. 30, 2012 Initial awards	May 31, 2012 Initial awards Independent directors item	Jun. 30, 2012 Initial awards Outside director	Jun. 30, 2012 Annual awards	May 31, 2012 Annual awards Independent directors item	Jun. 30, 2012 Annual awards Independent directors	Jun. 30, 2012 Annual awards Outside director
Equity Incentive Plan
Number of shares of common stock that may granted under the plan		690,000
Percentage of issued and outstanding shares of common stock eligible to be granted under the plan	7.50%
Number of directors receiving grants of restricted stock					5			5
Awards granted per director (in shares)					5,000			2,027
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period			42,162			5,000				2,027
Number of shares expected to vest ratably on quarterly basis				30,000			12,162
Award vesting period				3 years					1 year
Restricted stock activity
Granted (in shares)			42,162			5,000				2,027
Balance at the end of the period (in shares)			42,162
Vesting Schedule
2012 (in shares)			11,081
2013 (in shares)			16,081
2014 (in shares)			10,000
2015 (in shares)			5,000
Total (in shares)			42,162			5,000				2,027

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 87,455	$ 1,240
Restricted cash	2,087
Loans held for investment	78,173	4,945
Accrued interest receivable	580	3
Deferred financing costs, net	2,212	1,194
Other assets	752	205
Total assets	171,259	7,587
LIABILITIES
Due to affiliates	890	827
Dividends payable	555
Refundable deposits		200
Escrow liability	1,334
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	822	123
Total liabilities	3,601	1,150
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 and no shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 95,000,000 and 100,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, 9,242,162 and no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	92
Additional paid in capital - common stock	169,075	6,600
Accumulated deficit	(1,509)	(163)
Total stockholders' equity	167,658	6,437
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 171,259	$ 7,587

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Dividends declared	$ 0.06	$ 0.11

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	1 Months Ended		1 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012 Restricted stock	Aug. 31, 2012 Subsequent event Mezzanine loan	Aug. 02, 2012 Subsequent event Mezzanine loan	Jul. 31, 2012 Subsequent event Restricted stock Tae-Sik Yoon
Subsequent Events
Granted (in shares)			42,162			25,000
Vesting period						4 years
Amount of loan collateralized by interests in an office building	$ 72,944			$ 14,300
Carrying amount	$ 78,173	$ 4,945			$ 14,157
Initial effective yield (as a percent)	8.00%			10.70%

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.

Schedule of loan commitments

	As of
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total commitments	$	98,876		$	11,000
Less: funded commitments	(79,025		)	(5,055		)
Total unfunded commitments	$	19,851		$	5,945

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Schedule of computations of basic and diluted earnings per share

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012			For the six months ended June 30, 2012
Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(225	)	$	(341	)
Divided by:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding—basic and diluted (1):	6,576,923			3,787,747
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.09	)

(1)The dilutive impact of the Company’s restricted stock grants has not been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Operating activities:
Net income	$ 333
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs	265
Accretion of deferred loan origination fees	(138)
Stock based compensation	67
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	(753)
Interest receivable	(577)
Other assets	(681)
Due to affiliate	573
Refundable deposits	(200)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	405
Net cash used in operating activities	(706)
Investing activities:
Issuance of and fundings on loans held for investment, net	(73,164)
Principal repayment of loans held for investment	74
Payment of furniture, fixtures and equipment	(62)
Net cash used in investing activities	(73,152)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from secured financing arrangements	47,277
Repayments of secured financing arrangements	(47,277)
Secured financing costs	(1,637)
Series A preferred dividend	(102)
Proceeds from issuance of Series A convertible preferred stock	5,723
Redemption of Series A convertible preferred stock	(6,295)
Proceeds for issuance of common stock	165,850
Payment of offering costs	(3,016)
Pre-IPO common dividend payment	(450)
Net cash provided by financing activities	160,073
Change in cash and cash equivalents	86,215
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,240
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	87,455
Supplemental Information:
Interest paid during the period	426
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activities:
Dividends payable	555
Accrued financing and offering costs	$ 379

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	0
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	95,000,000	100,000
Common stock, shares issued	9,242,162	0
Common stock, shares outstanding	9,242,162	0

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

10.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Management Agreements

The Company was party to an interim management agreement with ACREM prior to the IPO.  ACREM provides investment advisory and management services to the Company. For providing these services on an interim basis, ACREM had agreed to receive only reimbursements from the Company for any third party costs that ACREM incurs on behalf of the Company.

In addition, two of the Company’s subsidiaries, Lender C and Lender W, along with their respective lenders, Citibank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, have entered into interim servicing agreements with ACREM’s subsidiary servicer, Ares Commercial Real Estate Servicer LLC (“ACRES”), a Standard & Poor’s-ranked commercial primary and special servicer that is included on S&P’s Select Servicer List.  Effective May 1, 2012, ACRES waived the servicing fee but will continue to receive reimbursement for overhead related to servicing and operational activities pursuant to the terms of the management agreement set forth below.

On April 25, 2012, in connection with our IPO, the Company entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with ACREM under which ACREM, subject to the supervision and oversight of our board of directors, will be responsible for, among other duties, (a) performing all of the Company’s day-to-day functions, (b) determining the Company’s investment strategy and guidelines in conjunction with the Company’s board of directors, (c) sourcing, analyzing and executing investments, asset sales and financing and (d) performing portfolio management duties. In addition, ACREM will have an Investment Committee that will oversee compliance with the Company’s investment strategy and guidelines, investment portfolio holdings and financing strategy.

Effective May 1, 2012, in exchange for its services, ACREM is entitled to receive a base management fee, an incentive fee, expense reimbursements, grants of equity-based awards pursuant to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and a termination fee, if applicable, as set forth below.

The base management fee is equal to 1.5% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity per annum and calculated and payable quarterly in arrears in cash.  For purposes of calculating the management fee, stockholders’ equity means: (a) the sum of (i) the net proceeds from all issuances of the Company’s equity securities since inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance), plus (ii) the Company’s retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed fiscal quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods); less (b) any amount that the Company pays to repurchase our common stock since inception. It also excludes (x) any unrealized gains and losses and other non-cash items that have impacted stockholders’ equity as reported in the Company’s financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and (y) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP (such as a cumulative change to our operating results as a result of a codification change pursuant to GAAP), and certain non-cash items not otherwise described above (such as depreciation and amortization), in each case after discussions between ACREM and the Company’s independent directors and approval by a majority of the Company’s independent directors. As a result, the Company’s stockholders’ equity, for purposes of calculating the management fee, could be greater or less than the amount of stockholders’ equity shown on our financial statements.

The incentive fee is equal to the difference between: (a) the product of (i) 20% and (ii) the difference between (A) the Company’s Core Earnings (as defined below) for the previous 12-month period, and (B) the product of (1) the weighted average of the issue price per share of the Company’s common stock of all of the Company’s public offerings multiplied by the weighted average number of all shares of common stock outstanding (including any restricted stock units, any restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and other shares of the Company’s common stock underlying awards granted under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan as further described below) in the previous 12-month period, and (2) 8%; and (b) the sum of any incentive fees earned by ACREM with respect to the first three fiscal quarters of such previous 12-month period; provided, however, that no incentive fee is payable with respect to any fiscal quarter unless cumulative Core Earnings for the 12 most recently completed fiscal quarters is greater than zero. “Core Earnings” is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as GAAP net income (loss) excluding non-cash equity compensation expense, the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization (to the extent that the Company forecloses on any properties underlying its target investments), any unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income for the period, regardless of whether such items are included in other comprehensive income or loss, or in net income. The amount will be adjusted to exclude one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between ACREM and the Company’s independent directors and after approval by a majority of our independent directors.  For purposes of calculating the incentive fee prior to the completion of a 12-month period following this offering, Core Earnings will be calculated on the basis of the number of days that the Management Agreement has been in effect on an annualized basis.  No incentive fees were earned for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

The Company will reimburse ACREM at cost for operating expenses that ACREM incurs on the Company’s behalf, including expenses relating to legal, financial, accounting, servicing, due diligence and other services. The Company’s reimbursement obligation is not subject to any dollar limitation. The Company will not reimburse ACREM for the salaries and other compensation of its personnel, except for the allocable share of the salaries and other compensation of the Company’s (a) Chief Financial Officer, based on the percentage of his time spent on the Company’s affairs and (b) other corporate finance, tax, accounting, internal audit, legal, risk management, operations, compliance and other non-investment professional personnel of ACREM or its affiliates who spend all or a portion of their time managing the Company’s affairs based on the percentage of their time spent on the Company’s affairs.  No portion of the interim Chief Financial Officer salary was charged to the Company for the three or six months ended June 30, 2012.  The Company shall pay its pro rata portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses of ACREM and its affiliates required for the Company’s operations.  The initial term of the Management Agreement will end May 1, 2015, with automatic one-year renewal terms that end on the applicable anniversary of the completion of this offering. Except under limited circumstances, upon such a termination, the Company will pay ACREM a termination fee equal to three times the average annual base management fee and incentive fee received by ACREM during the 24 month period immediately preceding the most recently completed fiscal quarter prior to the date of termination, each as described above.

Summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company and amounts payable to the Manager:

	Incurred			Payable as of
	Three months ended June 30, 2012		Six months ended June 30, 2012	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Affiliate Payments
Management fees	$	419	419	$	419	—
Servicing fees	6		17	6		—
General and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate	302		302	302		—
Direct third party costs paid by Manager to be reimbursed by the Company
Deferred financing costs	46		149	46		621
Offering costs	41		298	41		—
Other assets	32		47	32		196
General and administrative expenses	44		87	44		10
	$	890	1,319	$	890	827

AIH

On February 8, 2012, the Company entered into a promissory note with AIH, whereby AIH loaned the Company $2,000. The note was repaid with $4 in interest due under the note on March 1, 2012 with the proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock.

As of June 30, 2012, AIH owned approximately 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock representing approximately 21.6% of the total shares outstanding.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Aug. 13, 2012
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Ares Commercial Real Estate Corp
Entity Central Index Key	0001529377
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		9,267,162
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

11.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements included herein. Other than those disclosed below, there have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Form 10-Q or would be required to be recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

On July 9, 2012, the Company appointed Tae-Sik Yoon as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, replacing Richard S. Davis, who served in the same capacity on an interim basis.  As the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Yoon also replaces Mr. Davis as a member of ACREM’s Investment Committee.

On July 9, 2012, Tae-Sik Yoon was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a four-year period.

On August 2, 2012, we originated a $14,300 mezzanine loan collateralized by interests in an office building located in Atlanta, GA. The loan was fully funded at closing; net of fees, the carrying amount is $14,157.  The initial effective yield on the mezzanine loan is 10.7%.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Net interest margin:
Interest income	$ 1,559	$ 2,508
Interest expense	(353)	(692)
Net interest margin	1,206	1,816
Expenses:
Management fees	419	419
Professional fees	331	414
General and administrative expenses	323	331
General and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate	308	319
Total expenses	1,381	1,483
Net income (loss)	(175)	333
Less income attributable to Series A convertible preferred stock:
Quarterly preferred dividends	(50)	(102)
Accretion of redemption premium		(572)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$ (225)	$ (341)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share (in dollars per share)	$ (0.03)	$ (0.09)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic (in shares)	6,576,923	3,787,747
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - diluted (in shares)	6,576,923	3,787,747
Dividends declared per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.06	$ 0.11

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

5.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has various commitments to fund investments in its portfolio as described below.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had the following commitments to fund various stretch senior and transitional senior mortgage loans, as well as subordinated debt investments:

	As of
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total commitments	$	98,876		$	11,000
Less: funded commitments	(79,025		)	(5,055		)
Total unfunded commitments	$	19,851		$	5,945

The Company from time to time may be party to litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2012, the Company is not aware of any legal claims.

XML

SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS

SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS

4.SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment		Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment
Wells Fargo Facility	$	—	$	172,450	$	—	$	75,000
Citibank Facility	—		86,225		—		50,000
Capital One Facility	—		50,000		—		—
Total	$	—	$	308,675	$	—	$	125,000

The secured financing arrangements are generally collateralized by assignments of specific loans held for investment originated by the Company.  The secured financing arrangements are guaranteed by the Company.

Generally, the Company partially offsets interest rate risk by matching the interest index of loans held for investments with the secured financing agreement used to fund them.

Wells Fargo Facility

On December 14, 2011, ACRC Lender W LLC (“Lender W”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a $75,000 secured revolving funding facility arranged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Wells Fargo Facility”), pursuant to which the Company may borrow funds to originate qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes.

Advances under the Wells Fargo Facility accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to the sum of (i) 30 day LIBOR plus (ii) a pricing margin range of 2.50% - 2.75%. Starting May 15, 2012, the Company incurs a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Wells Fargo Facility.  The initial maturity date of the Wells Fargo Facility is December 14, 2014, subject to two 12-month extension options.

On May 22, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum availability under the Wells Fargo Facility, subject to available collateral, from $75,000 to $172,450.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Wells Fargo Facility was zero.

Citibank Facility

On December 8, 2011, ACRC Lender C LLC (“Lender C”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a $50,000 secured revolving funding facility arranged by Citibank, N.A. (the “Citibank Facility”), pursuant to which the Company may borrow funds to originate qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans and A-Notes.

Under the Citibank Facility, Lender C may borrow funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans (each, an “Individual Loan”).  Each Individual Loan will be secured by an underlying loan originated by Lender C or an affiliate of Lender C.  Amounts outstanding under each Individual Loan will accrue interest at a per annum rate based on LIBOR. The margin can vary between 3.25% and 4.00% over the greater of LIBOR and 1.0%, based on the debt yield of the assets contributed into Lender C.  Effective March 3, 2012, the Company began incurring a non-utilization fee of 25 basis points on the average available balance of the Citibank Facility.  The maturity date of each Individual Loan will be the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such Individual Loan.

On April 16, 2012 and May 1, 2012, the agreements governing the Citibank Facility were amended to, among other things, increase the maximum availability under the Citibank Facility, subject to available collateral, from $50,000 to $86,225.  The end of the funding period was automatically extended to December 8, 2013 upon the completion of the IPO, and may be further extended for an additional 12 months upon the payment of the applicable extension fee and provided that no event of default is then occurring.   The completion of the IPO triggered a modification of the interest rate margin to a range of 2.50% -3.50% over the greater of LIBOR and 0.5%.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Citibank Facility was zero.

Capital One Facility

On May 18, 2012, ACRC Lender One LLC (“Lender One”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a $50,000 secured revolving funding facility (the “Capital One Facility”) with Capital One, National Association (“Capital One”), as lender and the Company, as guarantor.  The Capital One Facility will be used for originating qualifying senior commercial mortgage loans.  Under the Capital One Facility, Lender One may borrow funds on a revolving basis in the form of individual loans evidenced by individual notes (each, an “Individual Loan”).  Each Individual Loan will be secured by an underlying loan originated by Lender One or an affiliate of Lender One.  Amounts outstanding under each Individual Loan will accrue interest at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread ranging between 2.50% and 4.00%.  Lender One may request Individual Loans under the Capital One Facility through and including May 18, 2014, subject to successive 12-month extension options at Capital One’s discretion.  The maturity date of each Individual Loan will be the same as the maturity date of the underlying loan that secures such Individual Loan.  As of June 30, 2012, the outstanding balance on the Capital One Facility was zero.

Debt Covenants

The Wells Fargo Facility, Citibank Facility and Capital One Facility contain various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that require the Company or certain subsidiaries as guarantor or borrower to maintain minimum tangible net worth, liquidity levels and financial ratios, as defined in the respective agreements.

Effective June 29, 2012, the agreements governing the Wells Fargo Facility were amended to provide that the required minimum fixed charge coverage ratio with respect to the Company as guarantor will start to be tested upon the earlier to occur of (i) the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2013 and (ii) the first full calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which the Company reports “Loans held for investment” in excess of $200 million on its quarterly consolidated balance sheets.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Schedule of restricted stock award activity

	Restricted Stock Grants
Balance as of December 31, 2011	—
Granted	42,162
Vested	—
Forfeited	—
Balance as of June 30, 2012	42,162

Vesting schedule of restricted stock awards

	Restricted Stock Grants
2012	11,081
2013	16,081
2014	10,000
2015	5,000
Total	42,162

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with GAAP, and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s results of the operations and financial condition as of and for the periods presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include funds on deposit with financial institutions.

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes escrows for taxes, insurance, leasing outlays, capital expenditures, tenant security deposits, and payments required under certain loan agreements.  These escrow deposits are held on behalf of the respective borrowers and are offset by an escrow cash liability included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit.

Loans Held for Investment

Loans Held for Investment

The Company originates commercial real estate debt and related instruments generally to be held for investment and to maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan fees and origination costs, unless the loans are deemed impaired.

Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, the Company will record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate.

Each loan classified as held for investment is evaluated for impairment on a periodic basis.  Loans are collateralized by real estate and as a result, the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower could impact the expected amounts received and are therefore regularly evaluated. The Company monitors performance of its investment portfolio under the following methodology (1) borrower review, which analyzes the borrower’s ability to execute on its original business plan, reviews its financial condition, assesses pending litigation and considers its general level of responsiveness and cooperation; (2) economic review, which considers underlying collateral, i.e. leasing performance, unit sales and cash flow of the collateral and its ability to cover debt service as well as the residual loan balance at maturity; (3) property review, which considers current environmental risks, changes in insurance costs or coverage, current site visibility, capital expenditures and market perception; and (4) market review, which analyzes the collateral from a supply and demand perspective of similar property types, as well as from a capital markets perspective.  Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel who utilize various data sources, including periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating expenses, and the borrower’s exit plan, among other factors.

Underwriting Commissions and Offering Costs

Underwriting Commissions and Offering Costs

Underwriting commissions and offering costs incurred in connection with common stock offerings will be reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred that are not directly associated with the completion of a common stock offering will be expensed. Underwriting commissions that are the responsibility of and paid by a related party, such as our Manager, are reflected as a contribution of additional paid in capital from a sponsor in the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Interest income is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount and the contractual terms of each loan. Origination fees, contractual exit fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the initial loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective credit facilities. Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs was $304 and $39 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs.  The only financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are cash and cash equivalents. The Company has not elected the fair value option for the remaining financial instruments, including loans held for investment and secured financing agreements. Such financial instruments are carried at cost.  Fair value is separately disclosed (see Note 9).  The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others.

Level 3 — Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used.

Stock Based Compensation

Stock Based Compensation

The Company recognizes the cost of stock based compensation and payment transactions using the same expense category as would be charged for payments in cash. The fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the award, with an offsetting increase in stockholders’ equity. For grants to directors and officers, the fair value is determined based upon the market price of the stock on the grant date.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per Share

The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) allocable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for that period after consideration of the earnings allocated to our restricted stock and restricted stock units, which are participating securities as defined in GAAP.  Diluted earnings per share takes into effect any dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units, except when doing so would be anti-dilutive.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The Company believes that it will operate in a manner that will allow it to qualify for taxation as a REIT. As a result of the Company’s expected REIT qualification, the Company does not generally expect to pay U.S. federal corporate level taxes. Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute annually at least 90% of the Company’s taxable income to the Company’s stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the Company’s subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxes on the Company’s income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on the Company’s undistributed REIT taxable income.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of investments.

Segment Reporting

Segment Reporting

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company operated in one business segment.  The Company is primarily engaged in originating, investing in and managing commercial mortgage loans and other commercial real estate-related debt investments.

New Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements

Repurchase Agreements—In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance that revises the criteria for assessing effective control for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, and the amendment is to be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations or cash flows.

Fair Value Measurement—In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements under GAAP. The new guidance amends current fair value guidance to include increased transparency around valuation inputs and investment categorization. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

EARNINGS PER SHARE

EARNINGS PER SHARE

8.EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following information sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012:

	For the three months ended June 30, 2012			For the six months ended June 30, 2012
Net loss attributable to common stockholders:	$	(225	)	$	(341	)
Divided by:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding—basic and diluted (1):	6,576,923			3,787,747
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.09	)

(1)The dilutive impact of the Company’s restricted stock grants has not been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

XML

SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

6.SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

On February 8, 2012, our board of directors adopted resolutions classifying and designating 600 shares of authorized preferred stock as shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”).  Holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, when and as authorized by our board of directors and declared by us out of funds legally available for that purpose, dividends at the Prevailing Dividend Rate, compounded quarterly. The “Prevailing Dividend Rate” means (a) beginning on the issue date through and including December 31, 2012, 10% per annum, (b) beginning on January 1, 2013 through and including December 31, 2013, 11% per annum, (c) beginning on January 1, 2014 through and including December 31, 2014, 12% per annum, and (d) beginning on January 1, 2015 and thereafter, 13% per annum; provided, however, that the Prevailing Dividend Rate may decrease by certain specified amounts if the Company achieves a certain coverage ratio.

Shares of Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable by the Company at any time, in whole or in part, beginning on June 30, 2012, at the applicable redemption price. Additionally, shares of Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable at the option of the holder upon an IPO, at the applicable redemption price.  Holders of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock exercised this redemption in connection with the IPO.

In February 2012, we entered into subscription agreements with certain third party investors, pursuant to which such investors subscribed for commitments to purchase up to 475 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $50,000 per share.  On April 2, 2012, a cash dividend of $52 was paid in respect of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.

In May 2012, upon the consummation of the IPO, we redeemed all of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate redemption price of $6,295.  The redemption price for redeemed shares of Series A Preferred Stock was equal to (i) the sum of (a) the subscription price, (b) any dividends per share added thereto pursuant to the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock and (c) any accrued and unpaid dividends per share plus (ii) an amount equal to a percentage of the subscription price of the Series A Preferred Stock and 10%.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we issued 114.4578 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate subscription price of $5,723 and recognized the accretion of $572 for the redemption premium for a total balance of $6,295.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

In December 2011, Ares Investments Holdings LLC (“AIH”), an affiliate of ACREM, contributed $6,600 to the Company in exchange for the Company’s agreement to effectively issue 330,000 shares of our common stock upon an increase in the authorized number of shares of the Company’s common stock. Although there were no shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011, the accompanying consolidated financial statements assume these shares of common stock were issued to AIH during the period ended December 31, 2011.

On January 25, 2012, we entered into a subscription agreement with AIH, whereby AIH agreed to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of $8,000, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.

On February 6, 2012, we entered into a subscription agreement with AIH, whereby AIH agreed to purchase 770,000 shares of our common stock for a total purchase price of $15,400, after giving effect to the reverse stock split on February 22, 2012.

On February 8, 2012, the charter of the Company was amended and restated to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock and preferred stock to 95,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares, respectively. The par value remained at $0.01 per share.

On February 22, 2012, our board of directors and AIH approved a one-for-two reverse stock split whereby every two shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to this date were changed into one issued and outstanding share of our common stock.

On May 1, 2012, the Company completed its IPO of 7,700,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $18.50 per share, raising $142,450 in gross proceeds.  The underwriting commissions of $5,328 are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.  Under the underwriting agreement, our Manager was responsible for and paid directly the underwriting commissions. Because the Manager is a related party, the payment of underwriting commission of $5,328 by our Manager is reflected as a contribution of additional paid-in capital on the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity in accordance with GAAP.  The Company incurred approximately $3,350 of expenses in connection with the IPO, which is reflected as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The net proceeds to the Company totaled approximately $139,100. The Company used approximately $47,300 of the net proceeds of the IPO to repay outstanding amounts under the Wells Fargo Facility and the Citibank Facility and $6,295 to redeem all of its issued shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  The balance will be used for general corporate working capital purposes and to make investments in our target investments. Until appropriate investments can be identified, we may invest this balance in interest-bearing short-term investments, including money market accounts or funds, and CMBS or corporate bonds, which are consistent with our intention to qualify as a REIT.

Equity Incentive Plan

On April 23, 2012, the Company adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.  Pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company may grant awards consisting of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, restricted stock units and/or other equity-based awards to the Company’s outside directors, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, ACREM and other eligible awardees under the plan, subject to an aggregate limitation of 690,000 shares of common stock (7.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the shares sold in the IPO). Any restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and restricted stock units will be accounted for under Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718, resulting in share-based compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value of the underlying restricted shares of common stock or restricted stock units.

On May 1, 2012, in connection with the completion of the IPO, each of the Company’s five independent directors were granted 5,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, on May 1, 2012, each of the Company’s five independent directors were granted 2,027 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as 2012 annual compensation awards granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

On June 18, 2012, a sixth outside director of the Company was granted 5,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as an award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, on June 18th, 2012, the sixth director was granted 2,027 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock as a 2012 annual compensation award granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Restricted shares totaling 30,000 will vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a three-year period beginning on July 1, 2012. Restricted shares totaling 12,162 related to 2012 annual compensation awards will vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a one-year period beginning on July 1, 2012.

Schedule of Non-Vested Share and Share Equivalents

	Restricted Stock Grants
Balance as of December 31, 2011	—
Granted	42,162
Vested	—
Forfeited	—
Balance as of June 30, 2012	42,162

Vesting Schedule

	Restricted Stock Grants
2012	11,081
2013	16,081
2014	10,000
2015	5,000
Total	42,162

XML

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

9.FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial Instruments reported at fair value

The Company has certain assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with GAAP, including cash and cash equivalents. The Company did not have any other financial instruments at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011 that were required to be carried at fair value.

The carrying values of interest receivable and accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The carrying values of loans held for investment approximate fair value since the contractual rate approximates market rate.

Financial Instruments reported at cost

The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments carried at historical cost on a quarterly basis. These instruments are recorded at fair value only if they are impaired. No impairment charges have been recognized at June 30, 2012. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated using inputs such as discounted cash flow projections, market comparables, dealer quotes and other quantitative and qualitative factors. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different assumptions or methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. At June 30, 2012, the fair value of our financial instruments approximates cost using Level 3 fair value assumptions.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended			1 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 item	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM	Dec. 31, 2011 ACREM	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Management Fees	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Management Fees	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Servicing Fees	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Servicing Fees	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Allocated Expense Reimbursements	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Allocated Expense Reimbursements	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Deferred financing costs	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Deferred financing costs	Dec. 31, 2011 ACREM Deferred financing costs	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Offering costs	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Offering costs	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Other assets	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM Other assets	Dec. 31, 2011 ACREM Other assets	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM General and administrative expenses	Jun. 30, 2012 ACREM General and administrative expenses	Dec. 31, 2011 ACREM General and administrative expenses	Jun. 30, 2012 ACRES	Mar. 31, 2012 AIH	Jun. 30, 2012 AIH	Feb. 08, 2012 AIH
Related party transactions
Number of subsidiaries who entered into interim services agreements	2
Base management fees as a percentage of stockholders' equity per annum				1.50%
Percentage multiplied to arrive at first value affecting calculation of incentive fees				20.00%
Previous period for which core earnings are considered to arrive at first value affecting calculation of incentive fees				12 months
Previous period for product of weighted average price per share and weighted average number of shares of common stock and other shares				12 months
Percentage multiplied to arrive at difference of first value affecting calculation of incentive fees				8.00%
Number of fiscal quarters considered to arrive at second value affecting calculation of incentive fees				9 months
Period whose fiscal quarters are considered to arrive at first value affecting calculation of incentive fees				12 months
Period for which cumulative core earnings must be greater than zero				3 years
Period after offering for which core earnings will be based on the number of days that the management agreement has been in effect to arrive at incentive fee				12 months
Automatic renewal period of management agreement				1 year
Multiplier of average annual base management and incentive fee to arrive at termination fee				3
Period preceding most recently completed fiscal quarter considered for calculation of average of annual base management and incentive fee				24 months
Amount owed by the entity to related party	$ 890	$ 827	$ 890	$ 890	$ 827	$ 419	$ 419	$ 6	$ 6	$ 302	$ 302	$ 46	$ 46	$ 621	$ 41	$ 41	$ 32	$ 32	$ 196	$ 44	$ 44	$ 10	$ 0
Incurred			890	1,319		419	419	6	17	302	302	46	149		41	298	32	47		44	87
Promissory note entered into by the entity with related party																										2,000
Interest paid on note																								$ 4
Common stock owned by related party (in shares)																									2,000,000
Ownership interest held by related party (as a percent)																									21.60%

XML

SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

SECURED FINANCING AGREEMENTS

Schedule of secured financing agreements

	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment		Outstanding Balance		Total Commitment
Wells Fargo Facility	$	—	$	172,450	$	—	$	75,000
Citibank Facility	—		86,225		—		50,000
Capital One Facility	—		50,000		—		—
Total	$	—	$	308,675	$	—	$	125,000

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 item	Dec. 31, 2011
Deferred Financing Costs
Accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs	$ 304	$ 39
Segment Reporting
Number of operating business segment	1

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Total	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Accumulated Deficit
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	$ 6,437		$ 6,600	$ (163)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2011	0
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Authorized increase in shares of common stock		3	(3)
Authorized increase in shares of common stock (in shares)		330,000
Private issuance of common stock	23,400	12	23,388
Private issuance of common stock (in shares)		1,170,000
Proceeds from public offering of common stock	142,450	77	142,373
Proceeds from public offering of common stock (in shares)		7,700,000
Stock-based compensation	67		67
Stock-based compensation (in shares)		42,162
Offering costs	(3,350)		(3,350)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	(341)			(341)
Dividends declared ($0.11 per share)	(1,005)			(1,005)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2012	$ 167,658	$ 92	$ 169,075	$ (1,509)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2012	9,242,162	9,242,162

XML

LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT

LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT

3.LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT

The Company’s investments in mortgages and loans held for investment are accounted for at amortized cost.  The following tables summarize our loans held for investment as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	June 30, 2012
	Carrying Value		Funded Amount		Weighted Average Coupon		Effective Yield		Weighted Average Life (years) *
Senior mortgage loans	$	70,302	$	71,025	6.5	%	7.3	%	2.7
Subordinated debt investment	7,871		8,000		11.5	%	13.1	%	2.6
Total	$	78,173	$	79,025	7.0	%	8.0	%	2.6

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Funded Amount		Weighted Average Coupon		Effective Yield		Weighted Average Life (years) *
Senior mortgage loan	$	4,945	$	5,055	6.5	%	6.6	%	3.0

*Weighted average life is calculated based on the remaining term of the loan from the reporting date multiplied by the weighted average loan balance divided by the total weighted average loan balance for each type of loan held for investment.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the activity in our loan portfolio was as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2011	$	4,945
Initial funding	72,944
Receipt of origination fee	(880		)
Additional funding	1,100
Repayments	(74		)
Origination fee accretion	138
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	78,173

On January 27, 2012, we co-originated a $37,000 commitment for a transitional first mortgage loan on an office building located in Fort Lauderdale, FL. The loan was closed as a $15,000 subordinated debt B-Note, which we retained, and a $22,000 A-Note, which was fully funded by Citibank, N.A., one of our secured funding facility providers. The B-Note was initially funded in the amount of $8,000; net of fees, the funded amount was $7,850.

On February 8, 2012, we originated a $35,000 stretch first mortgage loan on an office building located in Boston, MA. The loan was fully funded at closing; net of fees, the funded amount was $34,650.

On February 13, 2012, we funded $29,945 of the total commitment of $37,950 for a transitional first mortgage loan on an office building located in Austin, TX; net of fees, the funded amount was $29,565.

As of June 30, 2012, all loans were paying in accordance with their terms and there were no loan impairments during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

XML

LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended	1 Months Ended		1 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012 Senior mortgage loans	Dec. 31, 2011 Senior mortgage loans	Jan. 31, 2012 Transitional first mortgage loan	Feb. 13, 2012 Transitional first mortgage loan	Feb. 29, 2012 Stretch first mortgage loan	Feb. 08, 2012 Stretch first mortgage loan	Jun. 30, 2012 Subordinated debt investment	Jan. 31, 2012 Debt B-Note	Jan. 27, 2012 Debt B-Note	Jan. 27, 2012 Debt A-Note
Loans held for investment
Carrying Value	$ 78,173,000	$ 70,302,000	$ 4,945,000		$ 29,565,000			$ 7,871,000		$ 7,850,000
Funded Amount	79,025,000	71,025,000	5,055,000		29,945,000		34,650,000	8,000,000		15,000,000	22,000,000
Total commitment amount					37,950,000
Weighted Average Coupon (as a percent)	7.00%	6.50%	6.50%					11.50%
Effective Yield (as a percent)	8.00%	7.30%	6.60%					13.10%
Weighted Average Life	2 years 7 months 6 days	2 years 8 months 12 days	3 years					2 years 7 months 6 days
Change in the activity of loan portfolio
Balance at the beginning of the period	4,945,000	4,945,000			29,565,000					7,850,000
Initial funding	72,944,000			37,000,000		35,000,000
Receipt of origination fee	(880,000)
Additional funding	1,100,000								8,000,000
Repayments	(74,000)
Origination fee accretion	138,000
Balance at the end of the period	$ 78,173,000	$ 70,302,000	$ 4,945,000		$ 29,565,000			$ 7,871,000		$ 7,850,000

XML

LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT

Schedule of loans held for investments

	June 30, 2012
	Carrying Value		Funded Amount		Weighted Average Coupon		Effective Yield		Weighted Average Life (years) *
Senior mortgage loans	$	70,302	$	71,025	6.5	%	7.3	%	2.7
Subordinated debt investment	7,871		8,000		11.5	%	13.1	%	2.6
Total	$	78,173	$	79,025	7.0	%	8.0	%	2.6

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Funded Amount		Weighted Average Coupon		Effective Yield		Weighted Average Life (years) *
Senior mortgage loan	$	4,945	$	5,055	6.5	%	6.6	%	3.0

*Weighted average life is calculated based on the remaining term of the loan from the reporting date multiplied by the weighted average loan balance divided by the total weighted average loan balance for each type of loan held for investment.

Schedule of activity in loan portfolio

Balance at December 31, 2011	$	4,945
Initial funding	72,944
Receipt of origination fee	(880		)
Additional funding	1,100
Repayments	(74		)
Origination fee accretion	138
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	78,173