10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

or

o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from                 to                 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-35287

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Delaware	90-0750824
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

1114 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 2800, New York, NY	10036
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(212) 608-5108

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes  o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  x Yes  o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  o Yes  x No

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding on October 30, 2015 was 58,022,217.

Rouse Properties, Inc.

Index

			PAGE NUMBER
Part I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014	4
		Consolidated Statements of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014	5
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014	6
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	49
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	50
Part II	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	51
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	51
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	51
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	51
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	51
	Item 5.	Other Information	51
	Item 6.	Exhibits	51
	SIGNATURE		52
	EXHIBIT INDEX		53

2

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Investment in real estate:
Land	$	378,855		$	371,363
Buildings and equipment	1,964,294			1,820,072
Less accumulated depreciation	(222,050		)	(189,838		)
Net investment in real estate	2,121,099			2,001,597
Cash and cash equivalents	6,277			14,308
Restricted cash	40,521			48,055
Accounts receivable, net	36,979			35,492
Deferred expenses, net	52,584			52,611
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	52,145			62,690
Assets of property held for sale	—			55,647
Total assets	$	2,309,605		$	2,270,400
Liabilities:
Mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430		$	1,584,499
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	123,655			113,976
Liabilities of property held for sale	—			38,590
Total liabilities	1,761,085			1,737,065
Commitments and contingencies	—			—
Equity:
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	—			—
Common stock: $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 58,084,620 issued and 58,022,217 outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and 57,748,141 issued and 57,743,981 outstanding as of December 31, 2014	580			578
Additional paid-in capital	654,304			679,275
Accumulated deficit	(120,463		)	(162,881		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,809		)	(482		)
Total stockholders' equity	532,612			516,490
Non-controlling interest	15,908			16,845
Total equity	548,520			533,335
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,309,605		$	2,270,400

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Minimum rents	$	52,035		$	51,817		$	154,339		$	144,608
Tenant recoveries	19,069			20,518			57,910			58,430
Overage rents	881			726			3,204			2,664
Other	1,568			1,722			5,070			4,711
Total revenues	73,553			74,783			220,523			210,413
Expenses:
Property operating costs	17,537			18,639			51,502			52,535
Real estate taxes	5,694			7,287			20,049			19,553
Property maintenance costs	1,864			2,394			7,558			8,170
Marketing	419			572			1,357			1,653
Provision for doubtful accounts	759			271			1,317			659
General and administrative	6,327			6,132			19,685			18,613
Provision for impairment	—			10,665			2,900			10,665
Depreciation and amortization	22,856			27,130			72,719			71,593
Other	1,254			1,371			5,205			2,631
Total operating expenses	56,710			74,461			182,292			186,072
Operating income	16,843			322			38,231			24,341
Interest income	4			34			18			310
Interest expense	(18,110		)	(26,592		)	(54,745		)	(63,239		)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt	(67		)	—			26,827			—
Provision for income taxes	(82		)	(136		)	(509		)	(383		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before gain on sale of real estate assets	(1,412		)	(26,372		)	9,822			(38,971		)
Gain on sale of real estate assets	—			—			32,496			—
Income (loss) from continuing operations	(1,412		)	(26,372		)	42,318			(38,971		)
Discontinued operations	—			—			—			—
Net income (loss)	(1,412		)	(26,372		)	42,318			(38,971		)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	110			(194		)	100			(194		)
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc.	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,418		$	(39,165	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. - Basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73		$	(0.69	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. - Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73		$	(0.69	)
Dividends declared per share	$	0.18		$	0.17		$	0.54		$	0.51
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$	(1,412	)	$	(26,372	)	$	42,318		$	(38,971	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instrument	(1,091		)	425			(1,327		)	(230		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(2,503	)	$	(25,947	)	$	40,991		$	(39,201	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

	Common Stock (shares)		Class B Common Stock (shares)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Non-controlling Interest			Total Equity
	(In thousands, except share amounts)
Balance at December 31, 2013	49,648,436		—	$	497	$	565,798		$	(111,125	)	$	—		$	111		$	455,281
Net loss	—		—	—		—			(39,165		)	—			194			(38,971		)
Comprehensive loss	—		—	—		—			—			(230		)	—			(230		)
Issuance of 8,050,000 shares of common stock, net of underwriting discount	8,050,000		—	81		150,616			—			—			—			150,697
Offering costs	—		—	—		(467		)	—			—			—			(467		)
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.13 per share for issuance of 8,050,000 shares and $0.17 per share for Q1, Q2 & Q3 dividend)	—		—	—		(30,583		)	—			—			—			(30,583		)
Issuance and amortization of stock compensation	42,489		—	—		2,737			—			—			—			2,737
Exercise of options	1,680		—	—		28			—			—			—			28
Net assets attributable to Non-Controlling Interest (as a result of Business Combination)	—		—	—		—			—			—			16,663			16,663
Balance at September 30, 2014	57,742,605		—	$	578	$	688,129		$	(150,290	)	$	(230	)	$	16,968		$	555,155
Balance at December 31, 2014	57,743,981		—	$	578	$	679,275		$	(162,881	)	$	(482	)	$	16,845		$	533,335
Net income (loss)	—		—	—		—			42,418			—			(100		)	42,318
Comprehensive loss	—		—	—		—			—			(1,327		)	—			(1,327		)
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.18 per share for Q1, Q2 & Q3 dividend)	—		—	—		(31,306		)	—			—			—			(31,306		)
Issuance and amortization of stock compensation	53,550		—	—		2,220			—			—			—			2,220
Exercise of options	279,171		—	2		4,115			—			—			—			4,117
Distributions to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—			—			—			(931		)	(931		)
Contributions from non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—			—			—			49			49
Forfeited restricted shares	(58,242	)	—	—		—			—			—			—			—
Net assets attributable to Non-Controlling Interest (as a result of Business Combination)	—		—	—		—			—			—			45			45
Issuance of shares under Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP")	3,757		—	—		—			—			—			—			—
Balance at September 30, 2015	58,022,217		—	$	580	$	654,304		$	(120,463	)	$	(1,809	)	$	15,908		$	548,520

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$	42,318		$	(38,971	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts	1,317			659
Depreciation	65,488			65,100
Amortization	7,231			6,493
Amortization/write-off of deferred financing costs	3,163			3,420
Amortization/write-off of debt market rate adjustments	(721		)	8,789
Amortization of above/below market leases and tenant inducements	5,551			9,850
Straight-line rent amortization	(744		)	(1,184		)
Stock based compensation	2,220			2,737
Provision for impairment	2,900			10,665
Gain on extinguishment of debt	(26,827		)	—
Gain on sale of real estate assets	(32,496		)	—
Net changes:
Accounts receivable	(2,874		)	(248		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(261		)	(2,795		)
Deferred expenses	(10,335		)	(10,854		)
Restricted cash	329			782
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	5,961			8,524
Net cash provided by operating activities	62,220			62,967
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisition of investments in real estate	(154,100		)	(109,330		)
Proceeds from sale of property, net	90,288			—
Development, building and tenant improvements	(101,368		)	(81,655		)
Demand deposit with affiliate	—			—
Restricted cash	3,254			1,458
Net cash used in investing activities	(161,926		)	(189,527		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds received from equity offering	—			156,976
Discount from equity offering	—			(6,279		)
Proceeds received from stock option exercise	4,117			28
Payments for offering costs	—			(467		)
Proceeds from issuance of mortgages, notes and loans payable	245,300			137,000
Borrowings under revolving line of credit	195,500			45,000
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable	(181,719		)	(97,319		)
Repayments under revolving line of credit	(137,500		)	(73,000		)
Dividends paid	(30,679		)	(27,152		)
Distributions to non-controlling interests, net	(882		)	—
Deferred financing costs	(2,462		)	(1,164		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	91,675			133,623
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(8,031		)	7,063
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,308			14,224
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	6,277		$	21,287
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest	$	51,909		$	49,461
Capitalized interest	2,218			1,875
Non-Cash Transactions:
Change in accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	1,819		$	(2,592	)

6

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Dividends declared, not yet paid	10,512			9,885
Assumption of mortgage related to the acquisition of a property	—			112,505
Capitalized market rate adjustments and deferred financing amortization	252			281
Supplemental non-cash information related to acquisition accounting:
Land	$	—		$	8,969
Buildings and equipment, net	—			103,123
Deferred expenses, net	—			1,841
Prepaid expenses and other assets	—			5,461
Mortgages, notes and loans payable	—			(112,505		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	—			(6,889		)
Supplemental non-cash information related to gain on extinguishment of debt:
Land	$	(18,384	)	$	—
Buildings and equipment, net	(52,446		)	—
Accounts receivable	(224		)	—
Deferred expenses, net	(1,555		)	—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(5,588		)	—
Mortgages, notes and loans payable	(103,545		)	—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(1,479		)	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

7

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1ORGANIZATION

Readers of this Quarterly Report should refer to the Company’s (as defined below) audited Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”), as certain footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate those contained in the Annual Report have been omitted from this Quarterly Report.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation (which include only normal recurring adjustments) have been included in this Quarterly Report.

Capitalized terms used, but not defined in this Quarterly Report, have the same meanings as in the Annual Report.

General

Rouse Properties, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that was created to hold certain assets and liabilities of General Growth Properties, Inc. ("GGP"). Prior to January 12, 2012, Rouse Properties, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Rouse" or the "Company") were a wholly-owned subsidiary of GGP Limited Partnership (“GGP LP”). GGP distributed the assets and liabilities of 30 of its wholly-owned properties (“RPI Businesses”) to Rouse on January 12, 2012 (the “Spin-Off Date”). Before the spin-off, the Company had not conducted any business as a separate company and had no material assets or liabilities. The operations, assets and liabilities of the business were transferred to the Company by GGP on the Spin-Off Date and are presented as if the transferred business was our business for all historical periods prior to the Spin-Off Date. As such, the Company's assets and liabilities on the Spin-Off Date were reflective of GGP's respective carrying values. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Rouse.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rouse, as well as all subsidiaries of Rouse and all joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. For consolidated joint ventures, the non-controlling partner’s share of the assets, liabilities and operations of the joint ventures (generally computed as the joint venture partner’s ownership percentage) is included in non-controlling interests as permanent equity of the Company. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation as of and for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

The Company operates in a single reportable segment referred to as its retail segment, which includes the operation, development and management of regional malls. Each of the Company's operating properties is considered a separate operating segment, as each property earns revenues and incurs expenses, individual operating results are reviewed and discrete financial information is available. The Company does not distinguish its operations based on geography, size or type and all operations are within the United States. No customer or tenant comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues, and the properties have similar economic characteristics.

NOTE 2SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Properties

Acquisition accounting was applied to real estate assets within the Rouse portfolio either when GGP emerged from bankruptcy in November 2010 or upon any subsequent acquisition. After acquisition accounting is applied, the real estate assets are carried at their cost basis less accumulated depreciation. Real estate taxes and interest costs incurred during development periods are capitalized. Capitalized interest costs are based on qualified expenditures and interest rates in place during the development period. Capitalized real estate taxes, interest and interest related costs are amortized over lives which are consistent with the developed assets.

Pre-development costs, which generally include legal and professional fees and other directly-related third party costs, are capitalized as part of the property being developed. In the event a development is no longer deemed to be probable, the costs previously capitalized are expensed.

8

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Tenant improvements, either paid directly or in the form of construction allowances paid to tenants, are capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life or applicable lease term. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for significant betterments and improvements are capitalized. In leasing tenant space, the Company may provide funding to the lessee through a tenant allowance. In accounting for a tenant allowance, the Company determines whether the allowance represents funding for the construction of leasehold improvements and evaluates the ownership of such improvements. If the Company is considered the owner of the leasehold improvements for accounting purposes, it capitalizes the amount of the tenant allowance and depreciates it over the shorter of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the related lease term. If the tenant allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event that the Company is not considered the owner of the improvements for accounting purposes, the allowance is capitalized as a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis.

Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based upon the following estimated useful lives:

	Years
Buildings and improvements	40
Equipment and fixtures	5 - 10
Tenant improvements	Shorter of useful life or applicable lease term

The Company reviews depreciable lives of its properties periodically and makes adjustments when necessary to reflect a shorter economic life.

Impairment

Operating properties and intangible assets

Accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets requires that if impairment indicators exist and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset are less than its carrying amount, an impairment provision should be recorded to write down the carrying amount of such asset to its fair value. The Company reviews all real estate assets for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each property and include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in real estate property net operating income and occupancy percentages, high loan to value ratios, and carrying values in excess of the fair values. Impairment indicators for pre-development costs, which are typically costs incurred during the beginning stages of a potential development and developments in progress, are assessed by project and include, but are not limited to, significant changes to the Company’s plans with respect to the project, significant changes in projected completion dates, revenues or cash flows, development costs, market factors and sustainability of development projects.

If an indicator of potential impairment exists, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. The cash flow estimates used both for determining recoverability and estimating fair value are inherently judgmental and reflect current and projected trends in rental, occupancy and capitalization rates, and estimated holding periods for the applicable assets. Although the estimated fair value of certain assets may exceed the carrying amount, a real estate asset is only considered to be impaired when its carrying amount cannot be recovered through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent a provision for impairment is determined to be necessary, the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value is expensed to operations. The adjusted carrying amount, which represents the new cost basis of the asset, is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset.

In August 2014, upon a maturity default on the Steeplegate Mall mortgage loan, the loan servicer appointed a receiver to take over the operations of the property until the property could be conveyed to the lender or a third party purchaser. As a result, the Company revised its intended hold period of this property to less than one year. The change in the hold period resulted in a change to undiscounted cash flows utilized in the impairment analysis and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the property was not recoverable. The Company recorded an impairment charge on the property of $7.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as the aggregate carrying value was higher than the fair value of the property. This impairment charge is included in “Provision for impairment” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). In March 2015, the property associated with Steeplegate Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt.

9

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In September 2014, the Company determined there were events and circumstances which changed management's estimated holding period for Collin Creek Mall. Subsequently, the lender had placed the loan into special servicing status and communicated to the Company that it would be unwilling to extend the term and discount the loan. As a result of the continued decline in the operating results of the property, management concluded it was in the best interest of the Company to convey the property to its lender prior to maturity in full satisfaction of the debt. Therefore, the Company revised its intended hold period of this property to less than one year. The change in the hold period resulted in a change to undiscounted cash flows utilized in the impairment analysis and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the property was not recoverable. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, to reduce the aggregate carrying value to the estimated fair value of the property. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.1 million, to reduce the aggregate carrying value to the estimated fair value of the property. This impairment charge is included in "Provision for impairment" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). In April 2015, the property associated with Collin Creek Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt.

No impairment charges were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes our intangible assets and liabilities as a result of the application of acquisition accounting:

	Gross Asset (Liability)			Accumulated (Amortization)/ Accretion			Net Carrying Amount
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Tenant leases:
In-place value	$	90,527		$	(41,165	)	$	49,362
Above-market	99,617			(57,768		)	41,849
Below-market	(62,030		)	23,199			(38,831		)
Ground leases:
Below-market	3,682			(653		)	3,029
December 31, 2014
Tenant leases:
In-place value	$	97,745		$	(43,481	)	$	54,264
Above-market	109,862			(58,866		)	50,996
Below-market	(65,476		)	22,184			(43,292		)
Ground leases:
Below-market	3,682			(537		)	3,145

The gross asset balances of the in-place value of tenant leases are included in "Buildings and Equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Acquired in-place tenant leases are amortized over periods that approximate the related lease terms. The above-market tenant leases and below-market ground leases are included in "Prepaid expenses and other assets, net", and below-market tenant leases are included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" as detailed in Notes 4 and 6, respectively.

Amortization of in-place intangible assets decreased the Company's income by $4.4 million and $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of in-place intangible assets decreased the Company's income by $15.2 million and $19.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of in-place intangibles is included in "Depreciation and amortization" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles decreased the Company's revenue by $1.3 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of above-market and below-market

10

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

lease intangibles decreased the Company's revenue by $5.4 million and $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles is included in "Minimum rents" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Future amortization/accretion of these intangibles is estimated to decrease the Company's net income as follows:

Year	In-place lease intangibles		Above/(below) market leases, net
	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2015	$	5,375	$	1,780
2016	14,036		5,254
2017	8,265		3,411
2018	5,678		989
2019	3,988		(500		)
2020	3,049		(995		)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of security deposits and cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, tenant improvements, capital renovations and capital improvements. 

Interest Rate Hedging Instruments

The Company recognizes its derivative financial instruments in either "Prepaid expenses and other assets, net" or "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net", as applicable, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gain or loss) of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. To qualify as a hedging instrument, a derivative must pass prescribed effectiveness tests, performed quarterly using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The Company entered into two derivative agreements that qualify as hedging instruments and were designated, based upon the exposure being hedged, as cash flow hedges. The fair value of the cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2015 was $1.8 million and is included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the Company's interest rate hedge is classified as Level 2 in the fair value measurement table. To the extent they are effective, changes in fair value of cash flow hedges are reported in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" ("AOCI/L") and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is recognized in current earnings during the period of change in fair value. The gain or loss on the termination of an effective cash flow hedge is reported in AOCI/L and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The Company also assesses the credit risk that the counterparty will not perform according to the terms of the contract.

Revenue Recognition and Related Matters

Minimum rent revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Minimum rent revenues also include amounts collected from tenants to allow the termination of their leases prior to their scheduled expiration dates as well as the amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases on acquired properties and tenant inducements. Minimum rent revenues also include percentage rents in lieu of minimum rent from those leases where the Company receives a percentage of tenant revenues.

The following is a summary of amortization of straight-line rent, lease termination income, net amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases, amortization of tenant inducements, and percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

11

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent amortization	$	422		$	97		$	744		$	1,184
Lease termination income	187			901			825			1,356
Net amortization of above and below-market tenant leases	(1,252		)	(2,433		)	(5,434		)	(9,829		)
Amortization of tenant inducements	(89		)	(11		)	(107		)	(21		)
Percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent	1,844			1,691			4,842			4,659

Straight-line rent receivables represent the current net cumulative rents recognized prior to when billed and collectible, as provided by the terms of the leases. The following is a summary of straight-line rent receivables, which are included in "Accounts receivable, net," in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reduced for allowances for doubtful accounts:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net	$	14,384	$	14,431

The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, which is estimated to be uncollectible. Such allowances are reviewed periodically based upon our recovery experience. The Company also evaluates the probability of collecting future rent which is recognized currently under a straight-line methodology. This analysis considers the long term nature of the Company's leases, as a certain portion of the straight-line rent currently recognizable will not be billed to the tenant until future periods. The Company's experience relative to unbilled straight-line rent receivable is that a certain portion of the amounts recorded as straight-line rental revenue are never collected from (or billed to) tenants due to early lease terminations. For the portion of the recognized deferred rent that is not deemed to be probable of collection, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided. Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.2 million and $3.4 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Tenant recoveries are amounts due from tenants that are established in the leases or computed based upon a formula related to real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and are generally recognized as revenues in the period in which the related costs are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not expect the actual results to materially differ from the estimated reimbursement.

Overage rent is paid by a tenant when its sales exceed an agreed-upon minimum amount. Overage rent is calculated by multiplying the sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease. Overage rent is recognized on an accrual basis once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds.

Other revenues generally consist of amounts earned by the Company for vending, advertising, and marketing revenues earned at the Company's malls and is recognized on an accrual basis over the related service period.

Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated similarly; however, it reflects potential dilution of securities by adding the incremental weighted average shares that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common stock at the earliest date possible to the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were 3,502,581 and 3,313,869 stock options outstanding, respectively, that potentially could be converted into shares of common stock and 80,196 and 213,009 shares of non-vested restricted stock outstanding, respectively. The impact of dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock have been considered in the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the nine months ended

12

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2015. The stock options and shares of restricted stock are excluded from the weighted average shares dilution computation for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as their effect is anti-dilutive.

Fair Value

The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value:

• Level 1 — quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities;

• Level 2 — observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and

• Level 3 — unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as a consideration of counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.  Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.  Accordingly, the Company's fair value estimates, which are made at the end of each reporting period, may be different than the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the sale or disposition of these assets.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's financial and non-financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis by the above categories:

	Total Fair Value Measurement			Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	(1,808	)	$	—	$	(1,808	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
December 31, 2014
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	1		$	—	$	1		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap	$	(482	)	$	—	$	(482	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	74,237		$	—	$	—		$	74,237

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾ The carrying value includes each mall's respective land, building, and in-place lease value.

The following is a reconciliation of the carrying value of properties that were impaired and disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

13

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Collin Creek Mall (1)(2)			Steeplegate Mall (1)(2)
	(In thousands)
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2015	$	51,767		$	22,659
Capital expenditures	—			—
Depreciation and amortization expense	(539		)	(219		)
Loss on impairment of real estate	(2,900		)	—
Disposition of real estate asset	(48,328		)	(22,440		)
Ending carrying value, September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ The carrying value includes the mall's respective land, building, in place lease value, and above and below market lease value.

⁽²⁾ The property was conveyed to its mortgage lender during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

The Company estimates fair value relating to impairment assessments utilizing a direct capitalization rate on forecasted net operating income or discounted cash flows that include all projected cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. Such projected cash flows are comprised of contractual rental revenues and forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are based on a reasonable range of current market rates for each property analyzed. The determination of which method to use is based on expected market conditions specific to the property being assessed. Based upon these inputs, the Company determined that its valuation of a property using a discounted cash flow model was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company uses interest rate swaps and caps to mitigate the effect of interest rate movements on its variable-rate debt. The Company has one interest rate cap and two interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2015 and the interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting. The interest rate swaps have met the effectiveness test criteria since inception and changes in their fair value are reported in "Other comprehensive income/(loss)" ("OCI/L") and are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The interest rate cap did not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in its fair value are reported in earnings during the period incurred. The fair value of the Company's interest rate hedges, classified under Level 2, are determined based on prevailing market data for contracts with matching durations, current and anticipated LIBOR information, consideration of the Company's credit standing, credit risk of the counterparty, and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions. See Note 7 for additional information regarding the Company's interest rate hedging instruments.

The Company's financial instruments are short term in nature and as such their fair values approximate their carrying amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets except for debt. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, management’s estimates of fair value are presented below. The Company estimated the fair value of the debt by using a future discounted cash flow analysis based on the use and weighting of multiple market inputs. As a result of the frequency and availability of market data, the inputs used to measure the estimated fair value of debt are Level 3 inputs. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. 

	September 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Fixed-rate debt	$	1,170,180	$	1,211,570	$	1,249,195	$	1,248,928
Variable-rate debt	467,250		468,400		335,304		336,791
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430	$	1,679,970	$	1,584,499	$	1,585,719

Deferred Expenses

Deferred expenses are comprised of deferred lease costs incurred in connection with obtaining new tenants or renewals of lease agreements with current tenants, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases and included in "Depreciation and amortization" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Deferred financing costs are amortized on a straight-line basis (which approximates the effective interest method) over the lives of

14

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

the related mortgages, notes, and loans payable and are included in "Interest expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The following table summarizes our deferred lease and financing costs:

	Gross Asset		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Deferred lease costs	$	58,355	$	(15,877	)	$	42,478
Deferred financing costs	15,671		(5,565		)	10,106
Total	$	74,026	$	(21,442	)	$	52,584
December 31, 2014
Deferred lease costs	$	55,647	$	(14,683	)	$	40,964
Deferred financing costs	19,151		(7,504		)	11,647
Total	$	74,798	$	(22,187	)	$	52,611

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company evaluates any potential asset retirement obligations, including those related to disposal of asbestos containing materials and environmental remediation liabilities. The Company recognizes the fair value of such obligations in the period incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be determined. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, estimated costs of environmental remediation of approximately $4.5 million have been recorded as a liability in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company reversed an environmental liability on the Boulevard Mall of $0.4 million, and is included in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Company does not believe actual remediation costs will be materially different than the estimates as of September 30, 2015.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to fair values of assets and liabilities for purposes of applying the acquisition method of accounting, the useful lives of assets, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables, impairment of long-lived assets, valuation of hedging instruments and fair value of debt. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

Discontinued Operations

Prior to 2014, the Company reclassified to discontinued operations any material operations and gains or losses on disposal related to properties that were held for sale or disposed of during the period, in accordance with the applicable accounting standards. In 2014, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity" issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"). ASU No. 2014-08 changes the definition of a discontinued operation to include only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. The Company applied the revised definition to all disposals on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This topic provides for five principles which should be followed to determine the appropriate amount and timing of revenue recognition for the transfer of goods and services to customers. The principles in this ASU should be applied to all contracts with customers regardless of industry,

15

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

but specifically exclude leases. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with two transition methods of adoption allowed. Early adoption for reporting periods prior to December 15, 2016 is not permitted. On April 1, 2015, the FASB board voted to postpone the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year.  The ASU is now effective for the reporting periods after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the financial statement impact of the guidance in this ASU and determining which transition method it will utilize.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." This topic provides guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and requires related footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance in this ASU.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,” which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. For public business entities, this ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance in this ASU.

NOTE 3ACQUISITIONS

The Company includes the results of operations of real estate assets acquired in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) from the date of the related transactions.

The following table presents the Company's acquisitions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Date Acquired	Property Name	Location	Square Footage Acquired	Purchase Price
2015 Acquisitions					(In thousands)
	01/28/2015	Mt. Shasta Mall (1)(2)	Redding, CA	521,000	$	49,000
	06/03/2015	Fig Garden Village (1)(3)	Fresno, CA	301,459	106,100
			2015 Acquisitions Total	822,459	$	155,100
2014 Acquisitions
	05/22/2014	Bel Air Mall (1)(4)	Mobile, AL	1,004,439	$	131,917
	08/29/2014	The Mall at Barnes Crossing (5)	Tupelo, MS	736,607	98,850
			2014 Acquisitions Total	1,741,046	$	230,767

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Rouse acquired a 100% interest in the mall.

⁽²⁾   The Company closed on a new $31.9 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.19%, matures in March 2025, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

⁽³⁾ The Company closed on a new $74.2 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.14%, matures in June 2025, is interest only for the first five years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

⁽⁴⁾ The Company assumed an existing $112.5 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 5.30%, matures in December 2015 and amortizes over 30 years.

⁽⁵⁾ Rouse acquired a 51% controlling interest in the mall and related properties. In conjunction with the closing of this transaction, the Company closed on a new $67.0 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.29%, matures in September 2024, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over a 30 years thereafter. See Note 12 for further details.

16

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents certain additional information regarding the Company's acquisitions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Property Name	Land		Building and Improvements		Acquired Lease Intangibles		Acquired Above Market Lease Intangibles		Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles			Other
2015 Acquisitions		(In thousands)
	Mt. Shasta Mall	$	7,809	$	38,008	$	3,779	$	915	$	(1,813	)	$	302
	Fig Garden Village	18,774		79,528		7,366		3,975		(2,907		)	(636		)
	Total	$	26,583	$	117,536	$	11,145	$	4,890	$	(4,720	)	$	(334	)
2014 Acquisitions
	Bel Air Mall	$	8,969	$	111,206	$	11,329	$	3,952	$	(6,889	)	$	3,350
	The Mall at Barnes Crossing	17,969		75,949		6,973		4,700		(8,100		)	1,359
	Total	$	26,938	$	187,155	$	18,302	$	8,652	$	(14,989	)	$	4,709

The Company incurred acquisition and transaction related costs of $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.7 million and $0.9 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Acquisition and transaction related costs consist of due diligence costs such as legal fees, environmental studies and closing costs. These costs were recorded in "Other" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded approximately $4.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively, in revenues and $0.4 million in net income and $1.3 million in net loss related to the acquisitions of Fig Garden Village and Mt. Shasta Mall. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded approximately $5.2 million and $7.0 million, respectively, in revenues and $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in net loss related to the acquisitions of Bel Air Mall and The Mall at Barnes Crossing.

The following condensed pro forma financial information for each of the nine months ended September 30,2015 and 2014 includes pro forma adjustments related to the acquisitions of Mt. Shasta Mall, Fig Garden Village, Bel Air Mall and The Mall at Barnes Crossing, which is presented assuming the acquisitions had been consummated as of January 1, 2014. The following condensed pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been assuming the acquisitions had been consummated as of January 1, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. Pro forma adjustments include above and below-market amortization, straight-line rent, interest expense, and depreciation and amortization.

17

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2015		2014
	As Adjusted (Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total revenues	$	224,579	$	236,976
Net income (loss)	$	41,138	$	(41,351	)
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	0.71	$	(0.72	)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	0.71	$	(0.72	)
Weighted average shares - basic	57,756,035		57,062,578
Weighted average shares - diluted	58,121,349		57,062,578

NOTE 4PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

The following table summarizes the significant components of prepaid expenses and other assets, net:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Above-market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$	41,849	$	50,996
Prepaid expenses	6,370		4,755
Below-market ground leases, net (Note 2)	3,029		3,145
Deposits	528		1,447
Other	369		2,347
Total prepaid expenses and other assets, net	$	52,145	$	62,690

18

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE, NET

Mortgages, notes and loans payable are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		Interest Rate at September 30, 2015		Scheduled Maturity Date
Fixed-rate debt:	(in thousands)
Steeplegate Mall	$	—	$	45,858	—	%	—
Bel Air Mall (1)	109,618		111,276		5.30		December 2015
Greenville Mall	39,995		40,602		5.29		December 2015
Vista Ridge Mall	66,361		68,537		6.87		April 2016
Washington Park Mall	—		10,505		—		—
The Centre at Salisbury(2)	115,000		115,000		5.79		May 2016
The Mall at Turtle Creek	76,883		77,648		6.54		June 2016
Collin Creek Mall	—		58,128		—		—
Grand Traverse Mall	—		59,479		—		—
West Valley Mall (3)	59,000		59,000		3.24		September 2018
Pierre BossierMall	46,071		46,654		4.94		May 2022
Pierre Bossier Anchor	3,573		3,637		4.85		May 2022
Southland Center (MI)	75,123		76,037		5.09		July 2022
Chesterfield Towne Center	106,820		107,967		4.75		October 2022
Animas Valley Mall	49,386		50,053		4.41		November 2022
Lakeland Square	67,131		68,053		4.17		April 2023
Valley Hills Mall	65,651		66,492		4.47		July 2023
Chula Vista Center (1)(4)	70,000		70,000		4.18		July 2024
The Mall at Barnes Crossing (1)	67,000		67,000		4.29		September 2024
Bayshore Mall (1)	46,500		46,500		3.96		October 2024
Mt. Shasta Mall (1)	31,850		—		4.19		March 2025
Fig Garden Village (1)	74,200		—		4.14		June 2025
Total fixed-rate debt	$	1,170,162	$	1,248,426
Add: Market rate adjustments	18		769
	$	1,170,180	$	1,249,195
Variable-rate debt:
NewPark Mall (1)(5)	$	114,250	$	65,304	2.44	%	September 2018
2013 Term Loan(6)(7)	285,000		260,000		2.29		November 2018
2013 Revolver (6)(7)	68,000		10,000		2.30		November 2017
Total variable-rate debt	$	467,250	$	335,304
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430	$	1,584,499

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ See the significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions table below, under "—Property-Level Debt" in this Note 5 for additional information regarding the debt related to each property.

⁽²⁾ The Company guaranteed a maximum amount of $3.5 million until certain financial covenants are met for two consecutive years.

⁽³⁾ During January 2014, the Company entered into a swap transaction which fixes the interest rate on the loan for this property at 3.24%, through June 2018. See Note 7 for further details.

⁽⁴⁾ On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center from the 2013 Senior Facility (as defined below) collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on Chula Vista Center. Sikes Senter debt was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing, and upon repayment, Sikes was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool balance.

⁽⁵⁾ LIBOR (90 day) plus 210 basis points. The Company entered into a fixed swap which fixes the interest rate at 3.26% beginning January 2016, through September 2018.

⁽⁶⁾ LIBOR (30 day) plus 210 basis points.

⁽⁷⁾ On June 30, 2015, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion feature" on the 2013 Senior Facility, increasing the 2013 Term Loan (as defined below) from $260.0 million to $285.0 million and increasing the availability on the 2013 Revolver (as defined below) from $285.0 million to $310.0 million.

19

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Property-Level Debt

The Company had individual property-level debt (the “Property-Level Debt”) on 18 of its 35 assets, totaling $1.28 billion (excluding $0.02 million of market rate adjustments) as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Property-Level Debt had a weighted average interest rate of 4.69% and an average remaining term of 4.9 years. The Property-Level Debt is generally non-recourse to the Company and is stand-alone (i.e., not cross-collateralized) first mortgage debt with the exception of customary recourse guarantees.

The following is a summary of significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions that have occurred during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

Property	Date	Balance at Date of Refinancing		Interest Rate		Balance of New Loan		New Interest Rate		Net Proceeds (1)		Maturity
September 30, 2015:
NewPark Mall (2)(3)	September 2015	$	64,665	3.44	%	$	114,250	2.44	%	$	47,942	September 2018
Fig Garden Village (4)	June 2015	—		—	%	74,200		4.14	%	—		June 2025
Mt. Shasta Mall (3)	February 2015	—		—	%	31,850		4.19	%	—		March 2025
December 31, 2014:
Bayshore Mall (3)	October 2014	$	—	—	%	$	46,500	3.96	%	$	43,400	October 2024
The Mall at Barnes Crossing (3)	August 2014	—		—	%	67,000		4.29	%	—		September 2024
Chula Vista Center (5)	July 2014	—		—	%	70,000		4.18	%	15,000		July 2024
Sikes Senter (5)	July 2014	54,618		5.20	%	—		—	%	—		—
Bel Air Mall	May 2014	—		—	%	112,505		5.30	%	—		December 2015

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Net proceeds are net of closing costs.

⁽²⁾ In September 2015, the loan associated with NewPark Mall was refinanced for $135.0 million, with an initial funding of $114.3 million. The loan provides for an additional funding of up to $20.8 million upon achieving certain conditions.  The loan has a term of three years with a one year extension option subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. A swap will be effective on this loan beginning January 1, 2016, which fixes the interest rate at 3.26%, through September 2018.

⁽³⁾ The loan is interest-only for the first three years.

⁽⁴⁾ The loan is interest-only for the first five years.

⁽⁵⁾ On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center, located in Chula Vista, CA, from the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on the property. Sikes Senter, located in Wichita Falls, TX, had an outstanding mortgage loan which was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing. Upon repayment, Sikes Senter was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility balance.

In January 2015, the loan associated with The Shoppes at Knollwood with a mortgage debt balance of $35.1 million was defeased simultaneously with the sale of the property. As of December 31, 2014, the loan was shown as a component of "Liabilities of property held for sale" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In February 2015, the Company repaid the $10.4 million mortgage debt balance on Washington Park Mall, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.35%.

In February 2015, the loan associated with Vista Ridge Mall was transferred to special servicing.

In March 2015, the property associated with Steeplegate Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $45.9 million.

In April 2015, the property associated with Collin Creek Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $57.6 million.

On July 1, 2015, the Company repaid the $59.0 million mortgage debt balance on Grand Traverse Mall, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.02% On July 29, 2015, Grand Traverse Mall was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool.

20

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Corporate Facility

2013 Senior Facility

On November 22, 2013, the Company entered into a $510.0 million secured credit facility that provides borrowings on a revolving basis of up to $250.0 million (the "2013 Revolver") and a $260.0 million senior secured term loan (the "2013 Term Loan" and together with the 2013 Revolver, the "2013 Senior Facility"). Borrowings on the 2013 Senior Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 185 to 300 basis points based on the Company's corporate leverage. The Company has the option, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, to exercise an "accordion" feature to increase the commitments under the 2013 Revolver and/or incur additional term loans in the aggregate amount of $250.0 million such that the aggregate amount of the commitments and outstanding loans under the 2013 Secured Facility does not exceed $760.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion" feature on the 2013 Senior Facility to increase the available borrowings of the 2013 Revolver thereunder from $250.0 million to $285.0 million.

During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015, through an amendment to the 2013 Senior Facility, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion" feature which increased the aggregate amount of commitments under the 2013 Senior Facility from $545.0 million to $595.0 million. The exercise increased availability on the 2013 Revolver from $285.0 million to $310.0 million and increased the 2013 Term Loan from $260.0 million to $285.0 million. The term and rates of the Company's 2013 Senior Facility were otherwise unchanged.

The 2013 Revolver has an initial term of four years with a one year extension option and the 2013 Term Loan has a term of five years. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had drawn $68.0 million on the 2013 Revolver. The Company is required to pay an unused fee related to the 2013 Revolver equal to 0.20% per year if the aggregate unused amount is greater than or equal to 50% of the 2013 Revolver or 0.30% per year if the aggregate unused amount is less than 50% of the 2013 Revolver.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of unused fees related to the 2013 Revolver. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of unused fees related to the 2013 Revolver. Under the 2013 Revolver, letters of credit totaling $0.9 million were outstanding as of September 30, 2015 in connection with two properties. Additionally, the Company had $0.06 million of letters of credit outstanding in relation to The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.01 million and $0.07 million, respectively, of letter of credit fees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $0.03 million and $0.09 million, respectively, of letter of credit fees.

The 2013 Senior Facility contains representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and defaults that are customary for such a real estate loan. In addition, the 2013 Senior Facility requires compliance with certain financial covenants, including borrowing base loan to value and debt yield, corporate maximum leverage ratio, minimum ratio of adjusted consolidated earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization to fixed charges, minimum tangible net worth, minimum mortgaged property requirement, maximum unhedged variable rate debt and maximum recourse indebtedness. Failure to comply with the covenants in the 2013 Senior Facility would result in a default thereunder and, absent a waiver or an amendment from our lenders, permit the acceleration of all outstanding borrowings under the 2013 Senior Facility. The default interest rate following a payment event of default under the 2013 Senior Facility is 3.0% more than the then-applicable interest rate. No assurance can be given that the Company would be successful in obtaining such waiver or amendment in this current financial climate, or that any accommodations that the Company was able to negotiate would be on terms as favorable as those in the 2013 Senior Facility. In December 2014, the Company entered into an amendment of the 2013 Senior Facility whereby certain modifications were made to the financial covenant calculations. As of September 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of the debt covenants related to the 2013 Senior Facility.

As of September 30, 2015, $2.19 billion of land, buildings and equipment (before accumulated depreciation) have been pledged as collateral for our mortgages, notes and loans payable. Certain mortgage notes payable may be prepaid but are generally subject to a prepayment penalty equal to a yield-maintenance premium, defeasance or a percentage of the loan balance.

The weighted-average interest rate on our collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable was approximately 4.17% and 4.64% as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The average remaining term was 4.5 and 4.7 years as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

21

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES, NET

The following table summarizes the significant components of accounts payable and accrued expenses, net:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Below market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$	38,831	$	43,292
Construction payable	23,201		16,272
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	11,672		9,901
Accrued real estate taxes	11,374		9,028
Accrued dividend	10,512		9,885
Accrued interest	6,586		4,380
Accrued payroll and other employee liabilities	6,447		9,352
Deferred income	4,989		5,471
Asset retirement obligation liability	4,532		4,545
Tenants and other deposits	1,649		1,336
Other	3,862		514
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$	123,655	$	113,976

NOTE 7 DERIVATIVES

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company records its derivative instruments in its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the derivative has been designated as a hedge and if so, whether the hedge has met the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting.

The Company's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from the counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up-front premium.

The effective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI/L") and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period in which the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate borrowings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized in earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded no hedge ineffectiveness for the interest rate swap.

Amounts reported in AOCI/L related to derivatives are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. As of September 30, 2015, the Company expects that an additional $1.3 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense over the next 12 months.

22

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows on borrowings related to the West Valley Mall in January 2014 through June 2018. The interest related to this loan was computed at a variable rate of LIBOR + 1.75% and the Company swapped this for a fixed rate of 1.49% plus a spread of 1.75%.

In September 2015, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows on borrowings related to the NewPark Mall through September 2018. The interest related to this loan was computed at a variable rate of LIBOR + 2.10% with a forward starting swap, effective on January 1, 2016 with a fixed interest rate of 1.16% plus a spread of 2.10%.

The interest rate swaps protect the Company from increases in the hedged cash flows attributable to increases in LIBOR.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative	Number of Instruments	Notional Amount
		(in thousands)
Interest rate swaps	2	$173,250

Non-Designated Hedges - Interest Rate Cap

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges are recorded directly in earnings. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, such amounts equaled $0.01 million and $0.01 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding derivative that was not designated as a hedge in qualifying hedging relationships:

Interest Rate Derivative	Number of Instruments	Notional Amount
		(in thousands)
Interest rate cap	1	$66,500

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Instrument Type	Location in consolidated balance sheets	Notional Amount		Designated Benchmark Interest Rate	Strike Rate		Fair Value at September 30, 2015			Fair Value at December 31, 2014			Maturity Date
Derivative not designated as hedging instruments		(dollars in thousands)
Interest Rate Cap	Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	$	66,500	One-month LIBOR	4.50	%	$	—		$	1		May 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$	173,250	One-month LIBOR	Various		$	(1,808	)	$	(482	)	Various

23

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

							Location of Losses Reclassified from OCI/L Into Earnings (Effective Portion)					Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)
Hedging Instrument	Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI/L (Effective Portion)							Loss Recognized in Earnings (Effective Portion)					Gain Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)
	2015			2014				2015		2014			2015		2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	$	(1,288	)	$	224		Interest expense	$	196	$	200	n.a.	$	—	$	—
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	$	(1,913	)	$	(756	)	Interest expense	$	587	$	526	n.a.	$	—	$	—

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The borrower (a special purpose entity) has an agreement with its derivative counterparty that contains a provision whereby, if the borrower defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default whereby repayment of such indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, the borrower could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The borrower has not posted any collateral related to this agreement. As of September 30, 2015, the fair value of the derivative liability, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to this agreement was $1.9 million. If the borrower had breached this provision as of September 30, 2015, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreement at its termination value of $1.9 million.

NOTE 8DISPOSITIONS OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS

In 2014, the Company adopted ASU 2014-08, which changed the definition and criteria of property dispositions classified as discontinued operations, on a prospective basis. Under terms of the new guidance, the dispositions described below were not considered to be discontinued operations.

The results of operations of the properties below, as well as any gain on extinguishment of debt and impairment losses related to the properties, are included in "Income from continuing operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for all periods presented, as applicable.

The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall

In January 2015, the Company sold The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall located in St. Louis Park, MN, for gross proceeds of $106.7 million. The mortgage debt of $35.1 million was defeased simultaneously with the sale of the property. The Company recognized a gain of $32.5 million as a result of the disposition, which is reflected in "Gain on sale of real estate assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

At closing, the Company entered into a development agreement with the buyer to complete the redevelopment of the property. The estimated $7.9 million of costs associated with the completion of the redevelopment project were escrowed. As of September 30, 2015, the redevelopment has been substantially completed. Any difference between escrowed funds and costs to complete will be reflected in "Gain on sale of real estate assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

24

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Steeplegate Mall

In March 2015, the Company conveyed Steeplegate Mall, located in Concord, NH, to its mortgage lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had a net outstanding balance of approximately $45.9 million. The Company recognized a $22.8 million gain related to the debt extinguishment, which is reflected in "Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Collin Creek Mall

In April 2015, the Company conveyed Collin Creek Mall, located in Plano, TX, to its mortgage lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had a net outstanding balance of approximately $57.6 million. The Company recognized a $4.1 million gain related to the debt extinguishment, which is reflected in "Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

There were no dispositions during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

NOTE 9INCOME TAXES

The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") beginning with the filing of its tax return for the 2011 fiscal year. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has met the requirements of a REIT and has filed its tax returns for the 2014 calendar year accordingly. Subject to its ability to continue to meet the requirements of a REIT, the Company intends to maintain this status in future periods.

To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including requirements to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income and to either distribute capital gains to stockholders, or pay corporate income tax on the undistributed capital gains. In addition, the Company is required to meet certain asset and income tests.

As a REIT, the Company will generally not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for tax treatment as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income or property, and to U.S federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income.

The Company has a subsidiary that it elected to treat as a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"), which is subject to federal and state income taxes. For each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $0.02 million in taxes associated with the TRS, which are recorded in "Provision for income taxes" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). For each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $0.05 million in taxes associated with the TRS which are recorded in "Provision for income taxes" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

NOTE 10COMMON STOCK

On January 13, 2014, the Company issued 8,050,000 shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering at a public offering price of $19.50 per share. Net proceeds of the public offering were approximately $150.7 million after deducting the underwriting discount of $6.3 million, but before deducting offering expenses.

Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, “Brookfield”) owned approximately 33.4% of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2015.

Dividends

On February 26, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a first quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on April 30, 2015 to stockholders of record on April 15, 2015.

25

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On May 4, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a second quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on July 31, 2015 to stockholders of record on July 15, 2015.

On July 30, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a third quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on October 30, 2015 to stockholders of record on October 15, 2015.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

On May 12, 2014, the Company established a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP"). Under the DRIP, the Company's stockholders may purchase additional shares of common stock by automatically reinvesting all or a portion of the cash dividends paid on their shares of common stock or by making optional cash payments, or both, at fees described in the DRIP prospectus. The DRIP commenced with the dividend paid on July 31, 2014 to stockholders of record on July 15, 2014. To date, the Company has purchased the shares needed to satisfy the DRIP elections in the open market. No additional shares have been issued.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On July 1, 2014, the Company commenced enrollment under its Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"). The ESPP was implemented to provide eligible employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries with an opportunity to purchase common stock of the Company at a discount of 5%, through accumulated payroll deductions or other permitted contributions. The ESPP was adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on February 27, 2014 and approved by its stockholders on May 9, 2014. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the ESPP is 500,000 subject to adjustments under certain circumstances. As of September 30, 2015, 5,133shares have been issued under the ESPP since its commencement.

NOTE 11STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

Incentive Stock Plans

On January 12, 2012, the Company adopted the Rouse Properties, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plan"). On February 26, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors approved an amendment ("Plan Amendment") to the Equity Plan increasing the total number of shares available for issuance. On May 8, 2015, the Plan Amendment was approved by the Company's stockholders.

Stock Options

Pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company granted stock options to certain employees of the Company.  The vesting terms of these grants are specific to the individual grant.  In general, participating employees are required to remain employed for vesting to occur (subject to certain limited exceptions).  In the event that a participating employee ceases to be employed by the Company, any options that have not vested will generally be forfeited. Stock options generally vest annually over a five year period.

The following tables summarize stock option activity for the Equity Plan for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015			2014
	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Stock options outstanding at January 1,	3,313,869		$15.89	2,579,171		$15.14
Granted	1,057,000		17.67	778,498		18.36
Exercised	(314,485	)	15.01	(1,680	)	16.48
Forfeited	(527,763	)	16.51	(42,120	)	15.34
Expired	(26,040	)	18.40	—		—
Stock options outstanding at September 30,	3,502,581		$16.40	3,313,869		$15.90

26

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Stock Options Outstanding (1)
Issuance	Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price
March 2012	1,108,860	6.50	$14.72
August 2012	36,400	6.92	13.75
October 2012	276,623	7.08	14.47
February 2013	538,600	7.42	16.48
February 2014	596,400	8.42	18.40
July 2014	28,198	8.83	17.20
February 2015	717,500	9.42	17.18
March 2015	200,000	9.50	19.76
Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2015	3,502,581	7.81	$16.40

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾As of September 30, 2015, 1,138,165 stock options are fully vested and are currently exercisable. As of September 30, 2015, the intrinsic value of these options was $0.2 million, and such stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $15.41 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.0 years.

The Company recognized $0.5 million in compensation expense related to the stock options for each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $1.5 million and $1.3 million in compensation expense related to the stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which is recorded in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Restricted Stock

Pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company granted restricted stock to certain employees and non-employee directors.  The vesting terms of these grants are specific to the individual grant, and are generally three to four year periods. In general, participating employees are required to remain employed for vesting to occur (subject to certain limited exceptions).  In the event that a participating employee ceases to be employed by the Company, any shares that have not vested will generally be forfeited. Dividends are paid on restricted stock and are not returnable, even if the underlying stock does not ultimately vest.

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015			2014
	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested restricted stock grants outstanding at January 1,	205,731		$15.45	278,617		$14.85
Granted	53,550		17.18	42,489		18.40
Forfeited	(58,242	)	15.41	—		—
Vested	(120,843	)	15.33	(108,097	)	15.05
Non-vested restricted stock grants outstanding at September 30,	80,196		$16.82	213,009		$15.45

The weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) of granted, non-vested restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2015 was 1.0 years.

The Company recognized $0.2 million and $0.5 million in compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.4 million in compensation expense related to restricted stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which is recorded in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

27

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other Disclosures

As of September 30, 2015, there was $6.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all nonvested options and restricted stock grants. Of this total, $0.7 million in 2015, $2.6 million in 2016, $1.7 million in 2017, $1.1 million in 2018, $0.6 million in 2019 and $0.1 million in 2020 will be recognized, respectively, in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  These amounts may be impacted by future grants, changes in forfeiture estimates or vesting terms, and actual forfeiture rates differing from estimated forfeiture rates.

NOTE 12NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

The non-controlling interest on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets represents Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock ("Preferred Shares") of Rouse Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a subsidiary of Rouse, and the interest in the Mall at Barnes Crossing entities.

Holdings issued 111 Preferred Shares at a par value of $1,000 per share to third parties on June 29, 2012. The Preferred Shareholders are entitled to a cumulative preferential annual cash dividend of 12.5%. These Preferred Shares may only be redeemed at the option of Holdings for $1,000 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. Furthermore, in the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation of Holdings, the Preferred Shareholders are entitled to a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. The Preferred Shares are not convertible into or exchangeable for any property or securities of Holdings.

On August 29, 2014, the Company purchased a 51% interest in three limited liability companies which together own and operate the Mall at Barnes Crossing, the Market Center, a strip shopping center located adjacent to the property, and various vacant land parcels associated with the development (collectively referred to as "The Mall at Barnes Crossing"). The Company determined it holds the controlling interest in the The Mall at Barnes Crossing. As a result, the joint venture is presented on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the three months ended September 30, 2014 on a consolidated basis, with the interests of the third parties reflected as a non-controlling interest.

In connection with the acquisition, the Company formed a joint venture with the other interest holders in the properties. Pursuant to the joint venture arrangements, the Company has the exclusive authority to manage the business of the joint venture, except for certain actions (e.g., disposing of the properties and incurring debt under certain circumstances) that would require the consent of a third-party partner.  At any time after August 29, 2017 (or earlier under certain circumstances), the Company will have the right to purchase its partners’ interests in the joint venture at a purchase price generally equal to their fair market value (the “Call Price”). Consideration paid to the Company's partners for their interests in the joint venture may, under certain circumstances, be in the form of shares of the Company's common stock and/or common units (“Units”) of the Company's operating partnership, Rouse Properties, LP (the “Operating Partnership”).  If the consideration for the Call Price includes Units, the Company, the Operating Partnership and a third-party partner will enter into a tax protection agreement that will provide for indemnification of such partner under certain circumstances against certain tax liabilities incurred by such partner, if such liabilities result from a transaction involving a taxable disposition of The Mall at Barnes Crossing or the failure to offer to such partner the opportunity to guarantee certain indebtedness.

NOTE 13 EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated using the two class method, which allocates earnings among common stock and participating securities to calculate EPS when an entity's capital structure includes either two or more classes of common stock or common stock and participating securities. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities. As such, unvested restricted stock of the Company is considered a participating security. The dilutive effect of options and their equivalents (including fixed awards and nonvested stock issued under stock-based compensation plans), is computed using the “treasury” method.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) used in basic and diluted EPS calculations (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

28

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015		2014
Net income (loss)	$	(1,412	)	$	(26,372	)	$	42,318	$	(38,971	)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	110			(194		)	100		(194		)
Income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders and Participating Security Holders	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,418	$	(39,165	)
Earnings allocable to common shares:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,425	$	(39,165	)
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	57,930,453			57,519,412			57,756,035		57,062,578
Add: effect of assumed shares issued under treasury stock method for stock options and restricted shares	—			—			365,314		—
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	57,930,453			57,519,412			58,121,349		57,062,578
Basic and Diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73	$	(0.69	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73	$	(0.69	)
Earnings allocable to Participating Security Holders:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to Participating Security Holders	$	—		$	—		$	267	$	—
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	57,930,453			57,519,412			57,756,035		57,062,578
Add: effect of assumed shares issued under treasury stock method for stock options and restricted shares	—			—			365,314		—
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	57,930,453			57,519,412			58,121,349		57,062,578
Basic and Diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- basic	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- diluted	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—

29

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 14RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Office Lease with Brookfield

Upon its spin-off from GGP, the Company assumed a 10-year lease agreement with Brookfield, as landlord, for office space for its corporate office in New York City. Costs associated with the office lease were $0.3 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $0.8 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. There were no costs outstanding and payable to Brookfield as of September 30, 2015.

Business Information and Technology Costs

As part of the spin-off from GGP, the Company commenced the development of its initial information technology platform ("Brookfield Platform"). The development of the Brookfield Platform required the Company to purchase, design and create various information technology applications and infrastructure. Brookfield Corporate Operations, LLC ("BCO") had been engaged to assist in the project development and to procure the various applications and infrastructure of the Company. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $8.3 million of infrastructure costs which were capitalized in "Buildings and equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had accelerated and written off any remaining infrastructure costs related to the Brookfield Platform.

The Company was also required to pay a monthly information technology services fee to BCO. Approximately $0.1 million and $0.8 million in costs were incurred for the three months ended September 30,2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.0 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to the BCO information technology services fee. As of September 30, 2015, there were $0.4 million of costs outstanding and payable associated with this fee.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company completed the development of its own information technology platform ("Rouse Platform") and had incurred approximately $9.0 millionof infrastructure costs. As ofSeptember 30, 2015,$7.1 millionwas included in "Buildings and equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the purchase, design and implementation of various technology applications and infrastructure costs for the Rouse Platform. The remaining$1.9 millionwas included in "Other" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to the planning, scoping and data governance associated with developing the Rouse Platform.

Financial Service Center

During 2013, the Company engaged BCO's financial service center to manage certain administrative services of Rouse, such as accounts payable and receivable, lease administration, and other similar types of services. As of September 30, 2015, the Company no longer engages BCO's financial service center to manage such administrative services. Approximately $0.5 million in costs were incurred for the three months ended September 30,2014 and $0.1 million and $1.4 million in costs were incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, there were no costs outstanding and payable related to these services.

Demand Deposit from Brookfield U.S. Holdings

In August 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with Brookfield U.S. Holdings ("U.S. Holdings") to place funds into an interest bearing account which earns interest at LIBOR plus 1.05% per annum. The demand deposit was secured by a note from U.S. Holdings and was guaranteed by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. The demand deposit had an original maturity of February 14, 2013 and was extended to November 14, 2014. However, the Company may have demanded the funds earlier by providing U.S. Holdings with three days notice. The Company earned approximately $0.03 million and $0.3 million in interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the agreement was terminated.

NOTE 15SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 8, 2015, the loan associated with Greenville Mall, located in Greenville, NC was refinanced with a new non-recourse mortgage loan for $45.5 million. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of of 4.46%, matures in November 2025, and amortizes over 30 years. This loan replaced a $40.2 million non-recourse mortgage loan which had a fixed interest rate of 5.29%.

30

ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On October 8, 2015, the loan associated with The Shoppes at Bel Air located in Mobile, AL was refinanced with a new non-recourse mortgage loan for $120.0 million. The initial funding of $110.5 million was used to retire the outstanding mortgage loan of $109.5 million, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.30%. The loan provides for an additional subsequent funding of $9.5 million upon achieving certain conditions. The loan bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR (30 day) plus 235 basis points, is interest only for the first two years, and has a fixed amortization thereafter. The loan has a term of three years, with twoone-year extension options subject to achieving certain conditions. The borrower entered into an interest swap commencing January 2016 which fixes the interest rate at 3.34%, through September 2018.

On October 29, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized management to implement a Stock Repurchase Program in the maximum amount of $50.0 million over a period of up to two years. Purchases made pursuant to the Stock Repurchase Program will be made in the open market from time to time as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements.  The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company in its discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors.  The Stock Repurchase Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.

On October 29, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which will be paid on January 29, 2016 to stockholders of record on January 15, 2016.

31

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

All references to numbered Notes are to specific footnotes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report and which descriptions are incorporated into the applicable response by reference. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with such Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) have the same meanings as in such Notes.

Forward-looking information

We may make forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report and in other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In addition, our senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, creditors, the media and others.

Forward-looking statements include:

• Descriptions of plans or objectives for future operations

• Projections of our revenues, net operating income (“NOI”), core net operating income (“Core NOI”), earnings per share, funds from operations (“FFO”), core funds from operations (“Core FFO”), capital expenditures, income tax and other contingent liabilities, dividends, leverage, capital structure or other financial items

• Forecasts of our future economic performance

• Descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing

Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements often include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “would” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements should not be unduly relied upon. They give our expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we might not update them to reflect changes that occur after the date they are made.

There are several factors, many beyond our control, which could cause results to differ materially from our expectations, some of which are described in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report.  These factors are incorporated herein by reference. Any factor could by itself, or together with one or more other factors, adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Overview—Introduction

As of September 30, 2015, our portfolio consisted of 35 regional malls in 21 states totaling over 24.1 million square feet of retail and ancillary space which was 91.6% leased and 87.3% occupied. Including anchors, our properties were 96.0% leased and 94.1% occupied. We elected to be treated as a REIT beginning with the filing of our U.S. federal income tax return for the 2011 taxable year. As of September 30, 2015, we have met the requirements of a REIT and have filed our tax returns for the 2014 fiscal year accordingly. Subject to our ability to meet the requirements of a REIT, we intend to maintain this status in future periods.

The majority of the income from our properties is derived from rents received through long-term leases with retail tenants. These long-term leases generally require the tenants to pay base rent which is a fixed amount specified in the lease. The base rent is often subject to scheduled increases during the term of the lease. Our financial statements refer to this as "minimum rents." Certain of our leases also include a component which requires tenants to pay amounts related to all or substantially all of their share of real estate taxes and certain property operating expenses, including common area maintenance and insurance. The revenue earned attributable to real estate tax and operating expense recoveries are recorded as "tenant recoveries". Another component of income is overage rent. Overage rent is paid by a tenant when its sales exceed an agreed upon minimum amount. Overage rent is calculated by multiplying the tenant's sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease. Overage rent is typically earned in the fourth quarter.

Our objective is to achieve growth in NOI, Core NOI, FFO and Core FFO by leasing, operating and repositioning retail properties with locations that are either market dominant (the only mall within an extended distance) or trade area dominant (the premier mall serving the defined regional consumer). We seek to continue to control costs and to deliver an appropriate tenant mix, higher occupancy rates and increased sales productivity, resulting in higher minimum rents.

We believe that the most significant operating factor affecting incremental cash flow, NOI, Core NOI, FFO and Core FFO is increased aggregate rents collected from tenants at our properties. These rental revenue increases are primarily achieved by:

32

• Increasing occupancy at the properties so that more space is generating rent;

• Increasing tenant sales in which we participate through overage rent;

• Re-leasing existing space and renewing expiring leases at rates higher than expiring or existing rates; and

• Prudently investing capital into our properties to generate an increased overall return.

Overview—Basis of Presentation

We were formed in August 2011 for the purpose of holding certain assets and assuming certain liabilities of GGP. Following the distribution of these assets and liabilities to us on January 12, 2012, we began operating our business as a stand-alone owner and operator of regional malls. The financial information included in this Quarterly Report has been presented on a consolidated basis for the periods presented.

Recent Developments

In July 2015, the Board of Directors declared a third quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on October 30, 2015 to stockholders of record on October 15, 2015.

On July 1, 2015, the Company repaid the $59.0 million mortgage debt balance on Grand Traverse Mall which had a fixed interest rate of 5.02%. On July 29, 2015, Grand Traverse Mall was added to the 2013 Corporate Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding balance.

On September 11, 2015, the loan associated with NewPark Mall was refinanced for $135.0 million, with an initial funding of $114.3 million. The loan provides for a subsequent funding of up to $20.8 million upon achieving certain conditions.  The loan has a term of three years with a one year extension option subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. The borrower entered into an interest swap commencing January 2016, which fixes the interest rate at 3.26%, through September 2018.

Results of Operations

As of September 30, 2015, our total portfolio consisted of 35 properties (which excludes Collin Creek Mall, Knollwood Mall and Steeplegate Mall, as these properties were disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015). Properties that were in operation and owned as of January 1, 2014, excluding properties that are undergoing redevelopment with significant disruption and an asset that has been reclassified as a special consideration asset⁽¹⁾, are referred to as our Same Property portfolio. As of September 30, 2015, our Same Property portfolio consisted of 27 properties. The following table identifies which of our properties were excluded from our Same Property portfolio:

Property	Location
Acquisitions:
Fig Garden Village	Fresno, CA
Mt. Shasta Mall	Redding, CA
The Mall at Barnes Crossing	Tupelo, MS
Bel Air Mall	Mobile, AL
Redevelopments:
Gateway Mall	Springfield, OR
NewPark Mall	Newark, CA
Spring Hill Mall	West Dundee, IL
Special Consideration Asset:(1)
Vista Ridge Mall	Lewisville, TX
Dispositions:
Collin Creek Mall	Plano, TX
Knollwood Mall	St. Louis Park, MN
Steeplegate Mall	Concord, NH

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾ A property is designated as a special consideration asset when it has a heightened probability of being conveyed to its lender absent substantive renegotiation.

33

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

		September 30, 2015			September 30, 2014			$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Minimum rents		$	52,035		$	51,817		$	218		0.4	%
Tenant recoveries		19,069			20,518			(1,449		)	(7.1	)
Overage rents		881			726			155			21.3
Other		1,568			1,722			(154		)	(8.9	)
Total revenues		73,553			74,783			(1,230		)	(1.6	)
Expenses:
Property operating costs		17,537			18,639			(1,102		)	(5.9	)
Real estate taxes		5,694			7,287			(1,593		)	(21.9	)
Property maintenance costs		1,864			2,394			(530		)	(22.1	)
Marketing		419			572			(153		)	(26.7	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		759			271			488			>100.0
General and administrative		6,327			6,132			195			3.2
Provision for impairment		—			10,665			(10,665		)	(100.0	)
Depreciation and amortization		22,856			27,130			(4,274		)	(15.8	)
Other		1,254			1,371			(117		)	(8.5	)
Total operating expenses		56,710			74,461			(17,751		)	(23.8	)
Operating income		16,843			322			16,521			>100.0
Interest income		4			34			(30		)	(88.2	)
Interest expense		(18,110		)	(26,592		)	8,482			31.9
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt		(67		)	—			(67		)	100.0
Provision for income taxes		(82		)	(136		)	54			39.7
Loss from continuing operations before gain on sale of real estate assets		(1,412		)	(26,372		)	24,960			94.6
Gain on sale of real estate assets		—			—			—			—
Loss from continuing operations		(1,412		)	(26,372		)	24,960			94.6
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			—
Net loss		$	(1,412	)	$	(26,372	)	$	24,960		94.6

Revenues

Total revenues decreased $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The dispositions of The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall, Steeplegate Mall and Collin Creek Mall (the "Asset Dispositions") contributed $4.5 million and the redevelopments of NewPark Mall, Gateway Mall and Spring Hill Mall (the "Redevelopment Properties") contributed $1.9 million to the decrease in revenue. These decreases were offset by a revenue increase of $5.7 million related to the acquisitions of The Mall at Barnes Crossing, Mt. Shasta Mall and Fig Garden Village (the "Acquired Properties").

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses decreased $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. Property operating expenses include property operating costs, real estate taxes, property maintenance costs, marketing, and provision for doubtful accounts. Expenses related to the Acquired Properties increased property operating expenses by $2.0 million, which were offset by $2.4 million in decreased expenses related to the Asset Dispositions. Our Same Property portfolio's operating expenses decreased $1.5 million year over year primarily attributable to a reduction in property real

34

estate taxes. The remaining decrease in expense is primarily the result of a reduction in expense at our properties under redevelopment.

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. Compensation costs increased $0.5 million, which were offset by a reduction of $0.2 million in information technology expenses due to transitioning from the Brookfield Platform to the Rouse Platform.

Provision for impairment decreased $10.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 due to the impairment of Steeplegate Mall and Collin Creek Mall during the three months ended September 30, 2014. As our intended holding period changed for these assets during the three months ended September 30, 2014, the undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying amount of the assets. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge for the excess carrying amount over the estimated fair value of the properties. No impairments were recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $4.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The Acquired Properties added $2.0 million in depreciation and amortization expense year over year, offset by $1.1 million in decreased expense as a result of the Asset Dispositions. Our Same Property portfolio's depreciation and amortization expense decreased $3.0 million primarily as a result of a decline in amortization expense of lease in place value and $1.0 million in acceleration of costs related to the Brookfield Platform being fully depreciated upon implementation of the Rouse Platform in May 2015.

Other expense decreased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014, of which $0.2 million was due to the non-recurring transaction costs we incurred for properties acquired during 2015. This was offset by an increase in technology expenses of $0.1 million due to the non-recurring costs we incurred for consultation associated with developing the Rouse Platform and monthly Brookfield costs.

Interest expense decreased $8.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily related to the write-off of $6.3 million in market rate adjustments on debt for Sikes Senter as a result of the payoff of the loan during the three months ended September 30, 2014. Of the variance, $2.9 million of the decrease was a result of the Asset Dispositions, offset by increased expense of $1.6 million from the Acquired Assets. The remaining variance is a result of a lower average interest rate for the existing portfolio year over year.

35

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

		September 30, 2015			September 30, 2014			$ Change			% Change
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Minimum rents		$	154,339		$	144,608		$	9,731		6.7	%
Tenant recoveries		57,910			58,430			(520		)	(0.9	)
Overage rents		3,204			2,664			540			20.3
Other		5,070			4,711			359			7.6
Total revenues		220,523			210,413			10,110			4.8
Expenses:
Property operating costs		51,502			52,535			(1,033		)	(2.0	)
Real estate taxes		20,049			19,553			496			2.5
Property maintenance costs		7,558			8,170			(612		)	(7.5	)
Marketing		1,357			1,653			(296		)	(17.9	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,317			659			658			99.8
General and administrative		19,685			18,613			1,072			5.8
Provision for impairment		2,900			10,665			(7,765		)	(72.8	)
Depreciation and amortization		72,719			71,593			1,126			1.6
Other		5,205			2,631			2,574			97.8
Total operating expenses		182,292			186,072			(3,780		)	(2.0	)
Operating income		38,231			24,341			13,890			57.1
Interest income		18			310			(292		)	(94.2	)
Interest expense		(54,745		)	(63,239		)	8,494			(13.4	)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt		26,827			—			26,827			100.0
Provision for income taxes		(509		)	(383		)	(126		)	(32.9	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before gain on sale of real estate assets		9,822			(38,971		)	48,793			>100.0
Gain on sale of real estate assets		32,496			—			32,496			100.0
Income (loss) from continuing operations		42,318			(38,971		)	81,289			>100.0
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			—
Net income (loss)		$	42,318		$	(38,971	)	$	81,289		>100.0

Revenues

Total revenues increased $10.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Acquired Properties contributed $21.8 million of the increase offset by a revenue decrease of $8.8 million related to the Asset Dispositions and $3.9 million related to the Redevelopment Properties. Our Same Property portfolio contributed $1.3 million to the increase year over year, with the remaining decrease in revenues resulting from redevelopment activities and our special consideration property.

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses decreased $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Property operating expenses include property operating costs, real estate taxes, property maintenance costs, marketing, and provision for doubtful accounts. Expenses related to the Acquired Properties increased property operating expenses by $6.9 million, which were offset by $4.6 million in decreased expenses related to the Asset Dispositions. Our Same Property portfolio's operating expenses decreased $1.7 million year over year primarily as a result of savings in insurance and real estate property taxes. The remaining decrease in expense is primarily the result of a reduction in expense at our properties under redevelopment.

36

General and administrative expenses increased by $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily the result of additional information technology costs incurred during the transition from the Brookfield Platform to the Rouse Platform, as well as compensation and employee related costs in 2015 from additional staffing completed.

Provision for impairment decreased $7.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we impaired Steeplegate Mall for $7.6 million and Collin Creek Mall for $3.1 million, offset by additional impairment on Collin Creek of $2.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. As our intended holding period changed for these assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying amount of the assets. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge for the excess carrying amount over the estimated fair value of the properties

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Acquired Properties added $10.0 million in depreciation and amortization expense year over year, offset by $2.9 million and $1.2 million in decreased expense as a result of the Asset Dispositions and Redevelopment Properties, respectively. Our Same Property portfolio's depreciation and amortization expense decreased $4.0 million primarily as a result of a decline in amortization expense of lease in place value and $1.4 million in acceleration of costs related to the Brookfield Platform being fully depreciated upon implementation of the Rouse Platform in May 2015.

Other expenses increased $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014, of which $2.0 million was due to non-recurring costs we incurred related to the development of the Rouse Platform. Also, during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we reversed an environmental liability on a property that was previously disposed of for $0.4 million.

Other Income and Expenses

Interest expense decreased $8.5 millionfor the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily related to the write-off of $6.3 million of market rate adjustments on debt for Sikes Senter due to the payoff of the loan during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Of the variance, $7.2 million of the decrease was a result of the Asset Dispositions, offset by increased expense of $6.1 million from the Acquired Assets. The remaining variance is a result of a lower average interest rate for the existing portfolio year over year.

Gain on extinguishment of debt increased $26.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as a result of the conveyance of Steeplegate Mall and Collin Creek Mall to their lenders.

Gain on sale of real estate assets increased $32.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as a result of the sale of The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall.

37

Operating Metrics

Leasing Volume

The following table represents the leases signed during the three months endedSeptember 30, 2015:

2015 Leasing Activity(1)(2)	Number of Leases	Square Feet	Term (in years)	Initial Inline Rent PSF (4)(5)		Initial Freestanding Rent PSF (4)(6)		Average Inline Rent PSF (5)(7)		Average Freestanding Rent PSF (6)(7)
New Leases
Under 10,000 sq. ft.	35	127,396	8.4	$	35.31	$	48.31	$	38.88	$	52.86
Over 10,000 sq. ft.	8	146,237	9.6	12.05		—		12.98		—
Total New Leases	43	273,633	9.1	$	22.63	$	48.31	$	24.77	$	52.86
Renewal Leases
Under 10,000 sq. ft.	44	142,848	3.5	$	29.14	$	36.93	$	29.94	$	38.61
Over 10,000 sq. ft.	3	65,343	4.2	9.27		—		9.33		—
Total Renewal Leases	47	208,191	3.7	$	22.16	$	36.93	$	22.70	$	38.61
Sub-Total	90	481,824	6.8	$	22.44	$	39.11	$	23.92	$	41.34
Percent in Lieu	13	50,068	n.a.	n.a.		n.a		n.a.		n.a
Total Q3 2015 (3)	103	531,892	6.8	$	22.44	$	39.11	$	23.92	$	41.34
Total Q2 2015	100	605,817
Total Q1 2015	115	456,779
Total YTD 2015	318	1,594,488

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Excludes anchors and specialty leasing. An anchor is defined as a department store or discount department store in traditional spaces whose merchandise appeals to a broad range of shoppers or spaces which are greater than 70,000 square feet.

⁽²⁾ Represents signed leases as of September 30, 2015.

⁽³⁾ The total leasing commissions were approximately $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. There were no material tenant concessions with respect to the leases signed during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

⁽⁴⁾ Represents initial rent at time of rent commencement consisting of base minimum rent, common area costs, and real estate taxes.

⁽⁵⁾ Inline spaces are all mall shop locations excluding anchor and freestanding stores.

⁽⁶⁾ Freestanding spaces are outparcel retail locations (locations that are not attached to the primary complex of buildings that comprise a shopping center). Excludes anchor stores.

⁽⁷⁾ Represents average rent over the lease term consisting of base minimum rent, common area costs, and real estate taxes.

38

The following table represents our weighted average in-place rent for freestanding and mall space that is less than 10,000 square feet for the three months ended September 30, 2015 for our Same Property portfolio:

	In-Place Rent < 10k SF (1)
	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2015	2014
Freestanding (2)	$20.47	$19.51
Mall (3)	$41.39	$39.71
Total Same Property portfolio	$38.64	$37.34

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Rent is presented on a cash basis and consists of base minimum rent, common area maintenance costs, and real estate taxes.

⁽²⁾ Freestanding spaces are outparcel retail locations (locations that are not attached to the primary complex of buildings that comprise a shopping center). Excludes anchor stores.

⁽³⁾ Mall shop locations excluding anchor and freestanding stores.

New and Renewal Lease Spread

The following table represents leasing and rent spread information for renewals and new leases that we signed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the rents of the expiring leases on the same space:

New and Renewal Lease Spread (1)
	Number of Leases	Square Feet	Term (in years)	Initial Rent PSF (2)	Average Rent PSF (3)	Expiring Rent PSF (4)	Initial Rent Spread		Average Rent Spread
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015	59	238,597	5.0	$26.13	$27.55	$23.08	$3.05	13.2%	$4.47	19.4%
Total YTD 2015	181	797,492	4.3	$26.27	$27.72	$23.58	$2.69	11.4%	$4.14	17.5%

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Excludes anchors, percent in lieu, and specialty leasing.

⁽²⁾ Represents initial rent per square foot at time of rent commencement, with rent consisting of base minimum rent, common area costs, and real estate taxes.

⁽³⁾ Represents average rent per square foot over the lease term, with rent consisting of base minimum rent, common area costs, and real estate taxes.

⁽⁴⁾Represents expiring rent per square foot at end of lease, with rent consisting of base minimum rent, common area costs, and real estate taxes.

Same Property Trends

• Same Property Core NOI was $36.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $36.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Same Property Core NOI was $109.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $107.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. See "—Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a discussion of Core NOI and a reconciliation of Same Property Core NOI and Core NOI from the consolidated net income as computed in accordance with GAAP.

• Average total rent for mall spaces that are less than 10,000 square feet increased 4.2% to $41.39 as of September 30, 2015 from $39.71 per square foot as of September 30, 2014 in our Same Property portfolio. The increase is attributable to higher rents on new and renewal leases as compared to existing rents of the Same Property portfolio.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary uses of cash include payment of operating expenses, working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayments, including principal and interest, reinvestment in properties, development and redevelopment of properties, acquisitions, tenant allowances, and dividends.

Our primary sources of cash are operating cash flow, refinancings of existing loans, equity offerings, and borrowings under our 2013 Revolver.

Our short-term (less than one year) liquidity requirements include scheduled debt maturities, recurring operating costs, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, and dividend requirements on our shares of common stock. We anticipate that these needs will be met with cash flows provided by operations and funds available under our 2013 Revolver.

39

Our long-term (greater than one year) liquidity requirements include scheduled debt maturities, capital expenditures to maintain, renovate and expand existing malls, property acquisitions, and development projects. Management anticipates that net cash provided by operating activities, asset sales, the funds available under our 2013 Revolver, and funds received from subsequent equity offerings will provide sufficient capital resources to meet our long-term liquidity requirements.

As of September 30, 2015, our combined contractual debt, excluding non-cash debt market rate adjustments, was approximately $1.64 billion. The aggregate principal and interest payments due on our outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2015 are approximately $173.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2015 and approximately $314.6 million for the year ending December 31, 2016.

Mortgages, notes and loans payable and the weighted-average interest rates are summarized as follows as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2015		Weighted Average Interest Rate			December 31, 2014		Weighted Average Interest Rate
Fixed-rate debt:
Collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable	$	1,170,162	4.90	%		$	1,248,426	5.07	%
Total Fixed-rate debt	1,170,162		4.90	%		1,248,426		5.07	%
Variable-rate debt:
Collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable (1)	$	399,250	2.33	%		$	325,304	3.02	%
2013 Revolver	68,000		2.30	%		10,000		2.92	%
Total Variable-rate debt	$	467,250	2.33	%		$	335,304	3.02	%
Add: Market rate adjustments	18					769
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable	$	1,637,430	4.17	%	(2)	$	1,584,499	4.64	%	(2)

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ A swap will be effective on a loan beginning January 1, 2016, which fixes the interest rate.

⁽²⁾ Total mortgages, notes and loan payable weighted average interest rates excludes market rate adjustments.

Hedging Instruments

The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Instrument Type

Location in consolidated balance sheets

Notional Amount

Designated Benchmark Interest Rate

Strike Rate

Fair Value at September 30, 2015

Fair Value at December 31, 2014

Maturity Date

Derivative not designated as hedging instruments

(dollars in thousands)

Interest Rate Cap

Prepaid expenses and other assets, net

$

66,500

One-month LIBOR

4.5

%

$

—

$

1

May 2016

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net

173,250

One-month LIBOR

Various

(1,808

)

(482

)

Various

Redevelopment

We continue to evaluate and execute the redevelopment of various malls within our portfolio in order to generate increased returns. A component of our business strategy is to identify value creation initiatives for our properties and to then invest capital to reposition and refresh our properties. These redevelopment opportunities are typically commenced in conjunction with leasing activity for the respective space. We anticipate funding our redevelopment projects with the net cash provided by operating activities and corporate and property level borrowings.

40

The table below describes our current redevelopment projects, which have commenced (dollars in thousands):

Property	Description	Total Project Square Feet	Total Estimated Project Cost	Cost as of September 30, 2015
Newpark Mall Newark, CA	140,000 SF of new entertainment space, including AMC Theater and a two level restaurant pavilion with patio seating.	175,000	$55,900(1)	$41,999
Gateway Mall Springfield, OR	De-mall and construct new exterior facing junior boxes including Marshall's, Hobby Lobby, Petco and new outparcels.	288,000	$45,200	$29,620
Southland Center Taylor, MI	Demolish vacant anchor and construct new 50,000 SF Cinemark Theater and restaurant collection.	62,000	$15,300	$2,753
Southland Mall Hayward, CA	Redevelop former Kohl's anchor for new Dick's Sporting Goods, convert inline space to new Cinemark Theater, junior boxes and full service and fast casual restaurants.	243,000	$44,400	$5,341
Spring Hill Mall West Dundee, IL	Replace former jcpenney anchor and inline space with new 37,000 SF Cinemark Theater, street scape, multi-tenant buildings and restaurant collection.	93,000	$19,716(2)	$3,945

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾ After deducting the benefit of the net present value of municipal incentive currently estimated at $9.6 million.

⁽²⁾ After deducting the benefit of the net present value of municipal incentive currently estimated at $5.9 million.

Operating Property Capital Expenditures

The table below describes our current operating property capital expenditures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2015
Ordinary capital expenditures (1)	$	635	$	1,875
Cosmetic capital expenditures	2,214		8,920
Tenant improvements and allowances (2)	6,601		14,703
Total	$	9,450	$	25,498

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Includes non-tenant recurring and non-recurring capital expenditures.

⁽²⁾ Includes tenant improvements and allowances on current operating properties, excluding anchors and strategic projects.

Summary of Cash Flows

Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2015 compared to the Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2014

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $62.2 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 compared to $63.0 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2014. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of improved working capital in comparison to the same period in the prior year.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $161.9 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $189.5 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2014. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, cash of $90.2 million was generated by the sale of The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall which was used to purchase Mt. Shasta Mall and fund the continued redevelopment of existing properties. Also, Fig Garden Village was purchased during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 for $106.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, $47.7

41

million was used in the redevelopment of properties and $19.4 million was used to purchase Bel Air Mall. Additionally, $10.0 million was invested in a demand deposit with an affiliate during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $91.7 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015, compared to $133.6 million provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, cash was used to repay the mortgage debt on Grand Traverse, The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall and Washington Park Mall along with $137.5 million used to repay draws on the 2013 Revolver. Partially offsetting the use of cash were proceeds from the financing of Mt. Shasta Mall of $31.9 million, proceeds from the financing of Fig Garden Village of $74.2 million, proceeds from the refinancing of NewPark Mall of $114.3 million and draws on the 2013 Revolver of $195.5 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, net cash was primarily provided by $150.7 million in net proceeds received from our common stock offering in January 2014. The net proceeds from this offering were offset by a $58.0 million repayment on the 2013 Revolver and $37.9 million in loan repayments during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments

The following table aggregates our contractual cash obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2015:

	2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		Thereafter		Total
	(in thousands)
Long-term debt-principal(1)	$	152,446	$	264,785	$	77,793	$	468,529	$	12,292	$	661,567	$	1,637,412
Interest payments(2)	20,509		49,849		42,530		40,082		29,982		112,173		295,125
Operating lease obligations	353		1,424		1,493		1,505		1,426		2,230		8,431
Total	$	173,308	$	316,058	$	121,816	$	510,116	$	43,700	$	775,970	$	1,940,968

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Excludes $0.02 million of non-cash market rate adjustments on debt.

⁽²⁾ Based on rates as of September 30, 2015. Variable rates are based on 30 day LIBOR rate of 0.19% and 90 day LIBOR rate of 0.33%.

We lease land or buildings at certain properties from third parties. The leases generally provide us with a right of first refusal in the event of a proposed sale of the property by the landlord. Rental payments are expensed as incurred and have, to the extent applicable, been straight-lined over the term of the lease.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

REIT Requirements

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S federal income tax purposes, among other requirements, we must distribute or pay tax on 100% of our capital gains and we must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to stockholders. To avoid current entity level U.S. federal income taxes, we plan to distribute 100% of our capital gains and ordinary income to our stockholders annually. We may not have sufficient liquidity to meet these distribution requirements. We have no present intention to pay any dividends on our common stock in the future other than in order to maintain our REIT status. Our Board of Directors may decide to pay dividends in the form of cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.

Seasonality

Although we have a year-long temporary leasing program, occupancies for short-term tenants and, therefore, rental income recognized, are higher during the second half of the year. In addition, the majority of our tenants have December or January lease years for purposes of calculating annual overage rent amounts. Accordingly, overage rent thresholds are most commonly achieved in the fourth quarter. As a result, revenue production is generally highest in the fourth quarter of each year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to fair values of assets and liabilities for purposes of applying the acquisition method of accounting, the useful lives of assets, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables, initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to acquisitions,

42

impairment of long-lived assets, fair value of debt, valuation of stock options granted and hedging instruments. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that are both significant to the overall presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments. Our critical accounting policies are discussed in our Annual Report and have not changed as of September 30, 2015.

43

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Real Estate Property Net Operating Income and Core Net Operating Income

We present NOI and Core NOI, as defined below, in this Quarterly Report as supplemental measures of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. We believe that NOI and Core NOI are useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. We define NOI as operating revenues (minimum rents, including lease termination fees, tenant recoveries, overage rents, and other income) less property and related expenses (real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, marketing, other property expenses, and provision for doubtful accounts). We define Core NOI as NOI excluding straight-line rent, amortization of tenant inducements, amortization of above and below-market tenant leases, and amortization of above and below-market ground rent expense. Other real estate companies may use different methodologies for calculating NOI and Core NOI and, accordingly, our NOI and Core NOI may not be comparable to other real estate companies.

Because NOI and Core NOI exclude general and administrative expense, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment, other, reorganization items, strategic initiatives, provision for income taxes, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, gain (loss) on sale of real estate assets, straight-line rent, above and below-market tenant leases, and above and below-market ground leases, we believe that NOI and Core NOI provide performance measures that, when compared year over year, reflect the revenues and expenses directly associated with owning and operating regional shopping malls and the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. These measures thereby provide an operating perspective not immediately apparent from GAAP operating income (loss) or net income (loss). We use NOI and Core NOI to evaluate our operating performance on a property-by-property basis because NOI and Core NOI allow us to evaluate the impact that factors such as lease structure, lease rates and tenant base, which vary by property, have on our operating results, gross margins and investment returns. Same Property Core NOI is presented to exclude termination income, the periodic effects of acquisitions of new properties, reductions in ownership as a result of sales or other transactions, certain properties undergoing redevelopment with significant disruption and assets that are considered special consideration.

In addition, management believes that NOI, Core NOI and Same Property Core NOI provide useful information to the investment community about our operating performance. However, due to the exclusions noted above, NOI and Core NOI should only be used as supplemental measures of our financial performance and not as an alternative to GAAP operating income (loss) or net income (loss). For reference, and as an aid in understanding management's computation of NOI and Core NOI, a reconciliation from the consolidated net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc as computed in accordance with GAAP to NOI and Core NOI (including Same Property portfolio Core NOI and Same Property portfolio Core NOI, as adjusted) is presented below:

44

	For the three months ended September 30,
	2015									2014
	Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc			Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc
	(In thousands)
Net loss	$	(1,412	)	$	110		$	(1,302	)	$	(26,372	)	$	(194	)	$	(26,566	)
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt	67			—			67			—			—			—
Provision for income taxes	82			—			82			136			—			136
Interest expense	18,110			(365		)	17,745			26,592			(78		)	26,514
Interest income	(4		)	—			(4		)	(34		)	—			(34		)
Other	1,254			—			1,254			1,371			—			1,371
Provision for impairment	—			—			—			10,665			—			10,665
Depreciation and amortization	22,856			(650		)	22,206			27,130			(98		)	27,032
General and administrative	6,327			—			6,327			6,132			—			6,132
NOI	$	47,280		$	(905	)	$	46,375		$	45,620		$	(370	)	$	45,250
Above and below market ground rent expense, net	39			—			39			39			—			39
Above and below market tenant leases, net	1,252			47			1,299			2,433			—			2,433
Amortization of tenant inducements	89			—			89			11			—			11
Amortization of straight line rent	(422		)	14			(408		)	(97		)	—			(97		)
Core NOI	$	48,238		$	(844	)	$	47,394		$	48,006		$	(370	)	$	47,636
Non Same Property assets (1)	(10,530		)	—			(10,530		)	(10,406		)	—			(10,406		)
Termination income	(187		)	—			(187		)	(901		)	—			(901		)
Same Property Core NOI (2)	$	37,521		$	(844	)	$	36,677		$	36,699		$	(370	)	$	36,329

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Represents Bel Air Mall, The Mall at Barnes Crossing, Mt. Shasta and Fig Garden Village, which were acquired in May 2014, August 2014, January 2015 and June 2015, respectively, and the disposition of The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall, Steeplegate Mall and Collin Creek Mall in January 2015, March 2015 and April 2015, respectively. Same Property portfolio also excludes Gateway Mall, NewPark Mall and Spring Hill Mall, which are undergoing redevelopment with significant disruption. Vista Ridge Mall is a special consideration asset, which is also excluded from our Same Property portfolio. A property is designated as a special consideration asset when it has a heightened probability of being conveyed to its lender absent substantive renegotiation.

⁽²⁾ Same Property Core NOI includes legacy litigation expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 of $0.01 million and $0.07 million, respectively.

45

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015									2014
	Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc			Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	42,318		$	100		$	42,418		$	(38,971	)	$	(194	)	$	(39,165	)
Gain on extinguishment of debt	(26,827		)	—			(26,827		)	—			—			—
Gain on sale of real estate assets	(32,496		)	—			(32,496		)	—			—			—
Provision for income taxes	509			—			509			383			—			383
Interest expense	54,745			(1,083		)	53,662			63,239			(78		)	63,161
Interest income	(18		)	—			(18		)	(310		)	—			(310		)
Other	5,205			—			5,205			2,631			—			2,631
Provision for impairment	2,900			—			2,900			10,665			—			10,665
Depreciation and amortization	72,719			(1,842		)	70,877			71,593			(98		)	71,495
General and administrative	19,685			—			19,685			18,613			—			18,613
NOI	$	138,740		$	(2,825	)	$	135,915		$	127,843		$	(370	)	$	127,473
Above and below market ground rent expense, net	116			—			116			106			—			106
Above and below market tenant leases, net	5,434			36			5,470			9,829			—			9,829
Amortization of tenant inducements	107			—			107			21			—			21
Amortization of straight line rent	(744		)	42			(702		)	(1,184		)	—			(1,184		)
Core NOI	$	143,653		$	(2,747	)	$	140,906		$	136,615		$	(370	)	$	136,245
Non Same Property assets (1)	(30,672		)	—			(30,672		)	(27,592		)	—			(27,592		)
Termination income	(775		)	49			(726		)	(1,356		)	—			(1,356		)
Same Property Core NOI (2)	$	112,206		$	(2,698	)	$	109,508		$	107,667		$	(370	)	$	107,297

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Represents Bel Air Mall, The Mall at Barnes Crossing, Mt. Shasta and Fig Garden Village, which were acquired in May 2014, August 2014, January 2015 and June 2015, respectively, and the disposition of The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall, Steeplegate Mall and Collin Creek Mall in January 2015, March 2015 and April 2015, respectively. Same Property portfolio also excludes Gateway Mall, NewPark Mall and Spring Hill Mall, which are undergoing redevelopment with significant disruption. Vista Ridge Mall is a special consideration asset, which is also excluded from our Same Property portfolio. A property is designated as a special consideration asset when it has a heightened probability of being conveyed to its lender absent substantive renegotiation.

^{(2 )}Same Property Core NOI includes legacy litigation expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 of $0.05 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

Funds from Operations and Core Funds from Operations

Consistent with real estate industry and investment community practices, we use FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), as a supplemental measure of our operating performance. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains and losses on the sales of and impairment write-downs on depreciable real estate, gains or losses from cumulative effects of accounting changes, and extraordinary items, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization. We also include Core FFO as a supplemental measurement of operating performance. We define Core FFO as FFO excluding straight-line rent, amortization of tenant inducements, amortization of above- and below-market tenant leases, amortization of above- and below-market ground rent expense, reorganization items, amortization of deferred financing costs, mark-to-market adjustments on debt, write-off of market rate adjustments on debt, write-off of deferred financing costs, debt extinguishment costs, provision for income taxes, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, gain (loss) on sale of real estate assets and other expense. We also adjust for the portion of consolidated net income (loss) applicable to non-controlling interests of joint venture partners to reflect FFO attributable to the Company’s common shareholders. Other real estate companies may use different methodologies for calculating FFO and Core FFO and, accordingly, our FFO and Core FFO may not be comparable to other real estate companies.

46

We consider FFO and Core FFO useful supplemental measures and a complement to GAAP measures because they facilitate an understanding of the operating performance of our properties. FFO does not include real estate depreciation and amortization required by GAAP because these amounts are computed to allocate the cost of a property over its useful life. Since values for well-maintained real estate assets have historically increased or decreased based upon prevailing market conditions, we believe that FFO provides investors with a clearer view of our operating performance, particularly with respect to our mall properties. Core FFO does not include certain items that are non-cash and certain non-comparable items. FFO and Core FFO are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to revenues, operating income (loss), net income (loss) or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

For reference, and as an aid in understanding management's computation of FFO and Core FFO, a reconciliation from the consolidated net income (loss) as computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to the Company’s common shareholders and Core FFO attributable to the Company’s common shareholders is presented below:

	For the three months ended September 30,
	2015									2014
	Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc			Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc
	(In thousands)
Net loss	$	(1,412	)	$	110		$	(1,302	)	$	(26,372	)	$	(194	)	$	(26,566	)
Depreciation and amortization	22,856			(650		)	22,206			27,130			(98		)	27,032
Provision for impairment	—			—			—			10,665			—			10,665
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt	67			—			67			—			—			—
FFO	$	21,511		$	(540	)	$	20,971		$	11,423		$	(292	)	$	11,131
Provision for income taxes	82			—			82			136			—			136
Interest expense:
Amortization and write-off of market rate adjustments	(272		)	—			(272		)	7,129			—			7,129
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs	1,750			—			1,750			1,267			—			1,267
Debt extinguishment costs	—			—			—			259			—			259
Amortization of straight line rent for corporate and regional offices	5			—			5			35			—			35
Other	1,254			—			1,254			1,371			—			1,371
Above and below market ground rent expense, net	39			—			39			39			—			39
Above and below market tenant leases, net	1,252			47			1,299			2,433			—			2,433
Amortization of tenant inducements	89			—			89			11			—			11
Amortization of straight line rent	(422		)	14			(408		)	(97		)	—			(97		)
Core FFO	$	25,288		$	(479	)	$	24,809		$	24,006		$	(292	)	$	23,714

47

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2015									2014
	Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc			Consolidated			Non- Controlling Interest			Attributable to Rouse Properties Inc
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	42,318		$	100		$	42,418		$	(38,971	)	$	(194	)	$	(39,165	)
Depreciation and amortization	72,719			(1,842		)	70,877			71,593			(98		)	71,495
Provision for impairment	2,900			—			2,900			10,665			—			10,665
Gain on extinguishment of debt	(26,827		)	—			(26,827		)	—			—			—
Gain on sale of real estate assets	(32,496		)	—			(32,496		)	—			—			—
FFO	$	58,614		$	(1,742	)	$	56,872		$	43,287		$	(292	)	$	42,995
Provision for income taxes	509			—			509			383			—			383
Interest expense:
Amortization and write-off of market rate adjustments	(516		)	—			(516		)	9,015			—			9,015
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs	3,400			—			3,400			3,420			—			3,420
Debt extinguishment costs	—			—			—			259			—			259
Amortization of straight line rent for corporate and regional offices	14			—			14			56			—			56
Other	5,205			—			5,205			2,631			—			2,631
Above and below market ground rent expense, net	116			—			116			106			—			106
Above and below market tenant leases, net	5,434			36			5,470			9,829			—			9,829
Amortization of tenant inducements	107			—			107			21			—			21
Amortization of straight line rent	(744		)	42			(702		)	(1,184		)	—			(1,184		)
Core FFO	$	72,139		$	(1,664	)	$	70,475		$	67,823		$	(292	)	$	67,531

48

ITEM 3      QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in the market risks described in our Annual Report.

49

ITEM 4      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") participated in an evaluation by our management of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015. Based on their participation in that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2015 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or furnished under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

50

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.       LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of our business, we are from time to time involved in legal proceedings related to the ownership and operations of our properties. We are not currently involved in any legal or administrative proceedings that we believe are likely to have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS

There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. in our Annual Report.

ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Securities

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

There were no issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5.   OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101 The following financial information from Rouse Properties, Inc.’s. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2015 has been filed with the SEC on November 2, 2015, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (3) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (4) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (5) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, the registrant has not filed debt instruments relating to long-term debt that is not registered and for which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of September 30, 2015.  The registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such agreements to the SEC upon request.

51

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		ROUSE PROPERTIES, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date:	November 2, 2015	By:	/s/ John Wain
			John Wain
			Chief Financial Officer
			(on behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer)

52

Exhibit Index

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101	The following financial information from Rouse Properties, Inc’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2015 has been filed with the SEC on November 2, 2015, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (3) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (4) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (5) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

53

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Silberfein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Rouse Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 2, 2015	/s/ Andrew Silberfein
		Andrew Silberfein
		Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Wain, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Rouse Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 2, 2015	/s/ John Wain
		John Wain
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rouse Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Silberfein, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew Silberfein

Andrew Silberfein

Chief Executive Officer

November 2, 2015

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rouse Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Wain, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Wain

John Wain

Chief Financial Officer

November 2, 2015

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Fair Value Measurements)(Details) - Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Investment in Real Estate, Fair Value Disclosure	[1]	$ 0	$ 74,237
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Investment in Real Estate, Fair Value Disclosure	[1]	0	74,237
Interest Rate Cap [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Asset		0	1
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Liability		(1,808)	(482)
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Liability		(1,808)	(482)
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset		$ 0
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset			$ 1

[1] The carrying value includes each mall's respective land, building, and in-place lease value.

XML

DERIVATIVES (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jan. 31, 2014
Derivative [Line Items]
Additional reclassification	$ 1,300,000	$ 1,300,000
Derivative, fixed interest rate	1.16%	1.16%	1.49%
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, gain	$ 6,619	$ 7,178
Assets needed for immediate settlement, aggregate fair value	$ 1,900,000	$ 1,900,000
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative, basis spread on variable rate	2.10%	2.10%	1.75%

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Deposits	$ 528	$ 1,447
Prepaid expenses	6,370	4,755
Other	369	2,347
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	52,145	62,690
Ground leases
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Finite-lived intangible assets, net	3,029	3,145
Above-market tenant leases, net | Tenant leases
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Finite-lived intangible assets, net	$ 41,849	$ 50,996

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquisition and transaction related costs	$ 600		$ 500	$ 1,700	$ 900
Revenues	73,553		74,783	220,523	210,413
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent	(1,302)		(26,566)	42,418	(39,165)
Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Revenues	$ 4,000			7,600
Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent		$ 400		$ (1,300)
Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Revenues			5,200		7,000
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent			$ 500		$ 1,700

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Property, Plant and Equipment)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Properties
Preliminary estimate of the cost of the environmental remediation liability	$ 4,532	$ 4,532		$ 4,545
Provision for impairment	$ 0	$ 2,900	$ 10,665
Building and improvements
Properties
Estimated useful lives		40 years
Equipment and fixtures | Maximum [Member]
Properties
Estimated useful lives		10 years
Equipment and fixtures | Minimum [Member]
Properties
Estimated useful lives		5 years

XML

DERIVATIVES (Fair Value Derivative FInancial Instruments Balance Sheet Classification) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional Amount	$ 66,500
Strike Rate	4.50%
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Liability	$ (1,808)	$ (482)
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Cap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset		1
Cash Flow Hedging [Member] | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional Amount	66,500
Cash Flow Hedging [Member] | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Liability	(1,800)
Cash Flow Hedging [Member] | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Notional Amount	$ 173,250
Cash Flow Hedging [Member] | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Liability, Fair Value		$ (482)

XML

ACQUISITIONS Acquisitions (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Pro Forma Information

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2015		2014
	As Adjusted (Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total revenues	$	224,579	$	236,976
Net income (loss)	$	41,138	$	(41,351	)
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	0.71	$	(0.72	)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	0.71	$	(0.72	)
Weighted average shares - basic	57,756,035		57,062,578
Weighted average shares - diluted	58,121,349		57,062,578

Schedule of Acquistions

The following table presents the Company's acquisitions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Date Acquired	Property Name	Location	Square Footage Acquired	Purchase Price
2015 Acquisitions					(In thousands)
	01/28/2015	Mt. Shasta Mall (1)(2)	Redding, CA	521,000	$	49,000
	06/03/2015	Fig Garden Village (1)(3)	Fresno, CA	301,459	106,100
			2015 Acquisitions Total	822,459	$	155,100
2014 Acquisitions
	05/22/2014	Bel Air Mall (1)(4)	Mobile, AL	1,004,439	$	131,917
	08/29/2014	The Mall at Barnes Crossing (5)	Tupelo, MS	736,607	98,850
			2014 Acquisitions Total	1,741,046	$	230,767

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Rouse acquired a 100% interest in the mall.

⁽²⁾   The Company closed on a new $31.9 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.19%, matures in March 2025, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

⁽³⁾ The Company closed on a new $74.2 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.14%, matures in June 2025, is interest only for the first five years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

⁽⁴⁾ The Company assumed an existing $112.5 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 5.30%, matures in December 2015 and amortizes over 30 years.

⁽⁵⁾ Rouse acquired a 51% controlling interest in the mall and related properties. In conjunction with the closing of this transaction, the Company closed on a new $67.0 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.29%, matures in September 2024, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over a 30 years thereafter. See Note 12 for further details.

The following table presents certain additional information regarding the Company's acquisitions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Property Name	Land		Building and Improvements		Acquired Lease Intangibles		Acquired Above Market Lease Intangibles		Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles			Other
2015 Acquisitions		(In thousands)
	Mt. Shasta Mall	$	7,809	$	38,008	$	3,779	$	915	$	(1,813	)	$	302
	Fig Garden Village	18,774		79,528		7,366		3,975		(2,907		)	(636		)
	Total	$	26,583	$	117,536	$	11,145	$	4,890	$	(4,720	)	$	(334	)
2014 Acquisitions
	Bel Air Mall	$	8,969	$	111,206	$	11,329	$	3,952	$	(6,889	)	$	3,350
	The Mall at Barnes Crossing	17,969		75,949		6,973		4,700		(8,100		)	1,359
	Total	$	26,938	$	187,155	$	18,302	$	8,652	$	(14,989	)	$	4,709

XML

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE (Schedule of Property Refinancing) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		1 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
		Jul. 31, 2015	Feb. 28, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Jul. 01, 2015	Jun. 29, 2015	May. 04, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Oct. 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	Jul. 31, 2014	May. 31, 2014
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt				$ 1,637,430					$ 1,584,499
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt				245,300	$ 137,000
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable				(181,719)	(97,319)
NewPark Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[1]			$ 114,250			$ 64,665
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[1]			2.44%			3.00%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[1]			$ 47,942
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate				326.00%
Fig Garden Village [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[1]			$ 74,200			$ 0
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[1]			4.14%			0.00%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[1]			$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2]			4.14%
Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[1]		$ 0	$ 31,850
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[1]		0.00%	4.19%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[1]			$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2]			4.19%
Bay Shore Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[3]								$ 46,500	$ 0
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[3]								3.96%	0.00%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[3]				43,400
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2]			3.96%
The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[3]								$ 67,000		$ 0
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[3]								4.29%		0.00%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[3]				0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2]			4.29%
Chula Vista Center [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[4]								$ 70,000			$ 0
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[4]								4.18%			0.00%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[4]				15,000
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2],[5]			4.18%
Sikes Center [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt	[4]								$ 0			$ 54,618
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	[4]								0.00%			5.20%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt	[4]				0
Bel Air Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt								$ 112,505					$ 0
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage									5.30%				0.00%
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-term Debt					$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2]			5.30%
Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | NewPark Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long Term Debt, Length of Extension				1 year
Long-term Debt				$ 135,000
Long Term Debt, Initial Funding Amount				$ 114,300
Washington Park Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable			$ (10,400)
Grand Traverse Mall [Member] | Mortgages [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable		$ (59,000)
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						5.02%

[1] (1) Net proceeds are net of closing costs.

[2] See the significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions table below, under "—Property-Level Debt" in this Note 5 for additional information regarding the debt related to each property.

[3] The loan is interest-only for the first

[4] On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center, located in Chula Vista, CA, from the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on the property. Sikes Senter, located in Wichita Falls, TX, had an outstanding mortgage loan which was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing. Upon repayment, Sikes Senter was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility balance.

[5] (4) On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center from the 2013 Senior Facility (as defined below) collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on Chula Vista Center. Sikes Senter debt was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing, and upon repayment, Sikes was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool balance.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Deferred Expenses)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Deferred lease costs
Gross Asset	$ 58,355	$ 55,647
Accumulated Amortization	(15,877)	(14,683)
Net Carrying Amount	42,478	40,964
Deferred finance costs
Gross Asset	15,671	19,151
Accumulated Amortization	(5,565)	(7,504)
Net Carrying Amount	10,106	11,647
Total
Gross Asset	74,026	74,798
Accumulated Amortization	(21,442)	(22,187)
Net Carrying Amount	$ 52,584	$ 52,611

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Revenue Recognition and Related Matters)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Straight-line rent amortization	$ 422	$ 97	$ 744	$ 1,184
Lease termination income	187	901	825	1,356
Net amortization of above and below-market tenant leases	(1,252)	(2,433)	(5,434)	(9,829)
Amortization of lease inducement	(89)	(11)	(107)	(21)
Percentage rents in lieu of minimum rent	1,844	$ 1,691	4,842	$ 4,659
Straight-line rent receivables, net	14,384		14,384		$ 14,431
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 3,200		$ 3,200		$ 3,400

XML

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE (Corporate Facility, 2013 Senior Facility Narrative) (Details)		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Nov. 22, 2013 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) property asset	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) property asset	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Current borrowing capacity	$ 510,000,000	$ 595,000,000		$ 595,000,000		$ 545,000,000
Maximum increase in borrowing capacity						250,000,000
Line of credit, maximum credit						$ 760,000,000
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Environmental Contingencies		$ 900,000		$ 900,000
Number of real estate properties | property		18		18
Fees, Letter of Credit		$ 10,000	$ 30,000	$ 70,000	$ 90,000
Secured Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Pledged assets		$ 2,190,000,000		$ 2,190,000,000
Weighted average interest rate		4.20%		4.20%		4.60%
Knollwood Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Environmental Contingencies		$ 100,000		$ 100,000
ChesterfieldTowneCenter [Member] | Southland Center [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Number of real estate properties | asset		2		2
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | 2013 Revolver [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Current borrowing capacity	250,000,000	$ 310,000,000		$ 310,000,000		$ 285,000,000
Term						4 years
Long-term Line of Credit		68,000,000		$ 68,000,000
Extension option						1 year
Line of Credit Facility Unused Capacity Commitment Fee Percentage for Unused Credit Facility Greater than or Equal to Fifty Percent				0.20%
Commitment Fee Percentage, If Less Than 50 Percent				0.30%
Line of Credit Facility, Commitment Fee Amount		200,000	$ 200,000	$ 600,000	$ 600,000
Secured Debt [Member] | 2013 Term Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Current borrowing capacity	$ 260,000,000	$ 285,000,000		$ 285,000,000		$ 260,000,000
Term						5 years
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument Default Interest Rate	3.00%
Weighted Average [Member] | Secured Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Term				4 years 6 months	4 years 8 months	4 years 8 months 12 days

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jan. 12, 2012	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Aug. 31, 2012
Related party transactions
Operating Leases, Rent Expense		$ 0.3		$ 0.8
Monthly information technology services fee		0.1		1.0
Monthly information technology services fee payable		0.4		0.4
Capitalized Computer Software, Gross		9.0		9.0
Brookfield Asset Management Inc [Member] | Office leases [Member] | Building [Member]
Related party transactions
Term of lease agreement assumed upon spin off	10 years
Cost associated with agreement entered with the related party			$ 0.3		$ 0.5
Brookfield Corporate Operations LLC [Member]
Related party transactions
Cost associated with agreement entered with the related party			$ 0.5	$ 0.1	$ 1.4
U.S. Holdings [Member]
Related party transactions
Interest rate basis				LIBOR
Interest receivable (as a percent)						1.05%
Note receivable funds notice period				3 days
Buildings and Equipment [Member] | Brookfield Corporate Operations LLC [Member]
Related party transactions
Related Party Transaction Business Infrastructure Total Costs Incurred		8.3		$ 8.3
Buildings and Equipment [Member]
Related party transactions
Capitalized Computer Software, Gross		7.1		7.1
Other Expense [Member] | Brookfield Corporate Operations LLC [Member]
Related party transactions
Capitalized Computer Software, Gross		$ 1.9		$ 1.9

XML

COMMON STOCK (Details) - USD ($)		1 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 01, 2014	Jan. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Jul. 30, 2015	May. 04, 2015	Feb. 28, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Common Stock disclosures
Issuance of common stock related to the rights offering (in shares)		8,050,000
Share Price		$ 19.50
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock		$ 150,700,000	$ 0	$ 156,976,000
Underwriting Discount		$ (6,279,000)	0	(6,279,000)
Dividends Payable			$ 10,512,000	$ 9,885,000	$ 0.18	$ 0.18	$ 0.18	$ 9,885,000
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Employee Stock Purchase Plans			3,757
Employee Stock [Member]
Common Stock disclosures
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Discount from Market Price, Offering Date	5.00%
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Number of Shares Authorized	500,000
Common Class A [Member] | Brookfield
Common Stock disclosures
Related Party Beneficial Ownership Percentage Held in Reporting Entity			33.40%

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Pro Forma) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Total revenues			$ 224,579	$ 236,976
Net income (loss)			$ 41,138	$ (41,351)
Net income (loss) per share - basic			$ 0.71	$ (0.72)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted			$ 0.71	$ (0.72)
Weighted average shares - basic	57,930,453	57,519,412	57,756,035	57,062,578
Weighted average shares - diluted	57,930,453	57,519,412	58,121,349	57,062,578

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Properties

Acquisition accounting was applied to real estate assets within the Rouse portfolio either when GGP emerged from bankruptcy in November 2010 or upon any subsequent acquisition. After acquisition accounting is applied, the real estate assets are carried at their cost basis less accumulated depreciation. Real estate taxes and interest costs incurred during development periods are capitalized. Capitalized interest costs are based on qualified expenditures and interest rates in place during the development period. Capitalized real estate taxes, interest and interest related costs are amortized over lives which are consistent with the developed assets.

Pre-development costs, which generally include legal and professional fees and other directly-related third party costs, are capitalized as part of the property being developed. In the event a development is no longer deemed to be probable, the costs previously capitalized are expensed.

Tenant improvements, either paid directly or in the form of construction allowances paid to tenants, are capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life or applicable lease term. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for significant betterments and improvements are capitalized. In leasing tenant space, the Company may provide funding to the lessee through a tenant allowance. In accounting for a tenant allowance, the Company determines whether the allowance represents funding for the construction of leasehold improvements and evaluates the ownership of such improvements. If the Company is considered the owner of the leasehold improvements for accounting purposes, it capitalizes the amount of the tenant allowance and depreciates it over the shorter of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the related lease term. If the tenant allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event that the Company is not considered the owner of the improvements for accounting purposes, the allowance is capitalized as a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis.

Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based upon the following estimated useful lives:

	Years
Buildings and improvements	40
Equipment and fixtures	5 - 10
Tenant improvements	Shorter of useful life or applicable lease term

The Company reviews depreciable lives of its properties periodically and makes adjustments when necessary to reflect a shorter economic life.

Impairment

Operating properties and intangible assets

Accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets requires that if impairment indicators exist and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset are less than its carrying amount, an impairment provision should be recorded to write down the carrying amount of such asset to its fair value. The Company reviews all real estate assets for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each property and include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in real estate property net operating income and occupancy percentages, high loan to value ratios, and carrying values in excess of the fair values. Impairment indicators for pre-development costs, which are typically costs incurred during the beginning stages of a potential development and developments in progress, are assessed by project and include, but are not limited to, significant changes to the Company’s plans with respect to the project, significant changes in projected completion dates, revenues or cash flows, development costs, market factors and sustainability of development projects.

If an indicator of potential impairment exists, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. The cash flow estimates used both for determining recoverability and estimating fair value are inherently judgmental and reflect current and projected trends in rental, occupancy and capitalization rates, and estimated holding periods for the applicable assets. Although the estimated fair value of certain assets may exceed the carrying amount, a real estate asset is only considered to be impaired when its carrying amount cannot be recovered through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent a provision for impairment is determined to be necessary, the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value is expensed to operations. The adjusted carrying amount, which represents the new cost basis of the asset, is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset.

In August 2014, upon a maturity default on the Steeplegate Mall mortgage loan, the loan servicer appointed a receiver to take over the operations of the property until the property could be conveyed to the lender or a third party purchaser. As a result, the Company revised its intended hold period of this property to less than one year. The change in the hold period resulted in a change to undiscounted cash flows utilized in the impairment analysis and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the property was not recoverable. The Company recorded an impairment charge on the property of $7.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as the aggregate carrying value was higher than the fair value of the property. This impairment charge is included in “Provision for impairment” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). In March 2015, the property associated with Steeplegate Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt.

In September 2014, the Company determined there were events and circumstances which changed management's estimated holding period for Collin Creek Mall. Subsequently, the lender had placed the loan into special servicing status and communicated to the Company that it would be unwilling to extend the term and discount the loan. As a result of the continued decline in the operating results of the property, management concluded it was in the best interest of the Company to convey the property to its lender prior to maturity in full satisfaction of the debt. Therefore, the Company revised its intended hold period of this property to less than one year. The change in the hold period resulted in a change to undiscounted cash flows utilized in the impairment analysis and the Company concluded that the carrying value of the property was not recoverable. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, to reduce the aggregate carrying value to the estimated fair value of the property. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.1 million, to reduce the aggregate carrying value to the estimated fair value of the property. This impairment charge is included in "Provision for impairment" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). In April 2015, the property associated with Collin Creek Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt.

No impairment charges were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes our intangible assets and liabilities as a result of the application of acquisition accounting:

	Gross Asset (Liability)			Accumulated (Amortization)/ Accretion			Net Carrying Amount
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Tenant leases:
In-place value	$	90,527		$	(41,165	)	$	49,362
Above-market	99,617			(57,768		)	41,849
Below-market	(62,030		)	23,199			(38,831		)
Ground leases:
Below-market	3,682			(653		)	3,029
December 31, 2014
Tenant leases:
In-place value	$	97,745		$	(43,481	)	$	54,264
Above-market	109,862			(58,866		)	50,996
Below-market	(65,476		)	22,184			(43,292		)
Ground leases:
Below-market	3,682			(537		)	3,145

The gross asset balances of the in-place value of tenant leases are included in "Buildings and Equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Acquired in-place tenant leases are amortized over periods that approximate the related lease terms. The above-market tenant leases and below-market ground leases are included in "Prepaid expenses and other assets, net", and below-market tenant leases are included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" as detailed in Notes 4 and 6, respectively.

Amortization of in-place intangible assets decreased the Company's income by $4.4 million and $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of in-place intangible assets decreased the Company's income by $15.2 million and $19.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of in-place intangibles is included in "Depreciation and amortization" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles decreased the Company's revenue by $1.3 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles decreased the Company's revenue by $5.4 million and $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of above-market and below-market lease intangibles is included in "Minimum rents" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Future amortization/accretion of these intangibles is estimated to decrease the Company's net income as follows:

Year	In-place lease intangibles		Above/(below) market leases, net
	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2015	$	5,375	$	1,780
2016	14,036		5,254
2017	8,265		3,411
2018	5,678		989
2019	3,988		(500		)
2020	3,049		(995		)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of security deposits and cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, tenant improvements, capital renovations and capital improvements. 

Interest Rate Hedging Instruments

The Company recognizes its derivative financial instruments in either "Prepaid expenses and other assets, net" or "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net", as applicable, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gain or loss) of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. To qualify as a hedging instrument, a derivative must pass prescribed effectiveness tests, performed quarterly using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The Company entered into two derivative agreements that qualify as hedging instruments and were designated, based upon the exposure being hedged, as cash flow hedges. The fair value of the cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2015 was $1.8 million and is included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the Company's interest rate hedge is classified as Level 2 in the fair value measurement table. To the extent they are effective, changes in fair value of cash flow hedges are reported in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" ("AOCI/L") and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is recognized in current earnings during the period of change in fair value. The gain or loss on the termination of an effective cash flow hedge is reported in AOCI/L and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The Company also assesses the credit risk that the counterparty will not perform according to the terms of the contract.

Revenue Recognition and Related Matters

Minimum rent revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Minimum rent revenues also include amounts collected from tenants to allow the termination of their leases prior to their scheduled expiration dates as well as the amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases on acquired properties and tenant inducements. Minimum rent revenues also include percentage rents in lieu of minimum rent from those leases where the Company receives a percentage of tenant revenues.

The following is a summary of amortization of straight-line rent, lease termination income, net amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases, amortization of tenant inducements, and percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent amortization	$	422		$	97		$	744		$	1,184
Lease termination income	187			901			825			1,356
Net amortization of above and below-market tenant leases	(1,252		)	(2,433		)	(5,434		)	(9,829		)
Amortization of tenant inducements	(89		)	(11		)	(107		)	(21		)
Percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent	1,844			1,691			4,842			4,659

Straight-line rent receivables represent the current net cumulative rents recognized prior to when billed and collectible, as provided by the terms of the leases. The following is a summary of straight-line rent receivables, which are included in "Accounts receivable, net," in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reduced for allowances for doubtful accounts:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net	$	14,384	$	14,431

The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, which is estimated to be uncollectible. Such allowances are reviewed periodically based upon our recovery experience. The Company also evaluates the probability of collecting future rent which is recognized currently under a straight-line methodology. This analysis considers the long term nature of the Company's leases, as a certain portion of the straight-line rent currently recognizable will not be billed to the tenant until future periods. The Company's experience relative to unbilled straight-line rent receivable is that a certain portion of the amounts recorded as straight-line rental revenue are never collected from (or billed to) tenants due to early lease terminations. For the portion of the recognized deferred rent that is not deemed to be probable of collection, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided. Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.2 million and $3.4 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Tenant recoveries are amounts due from tenants that are established in the leases or computed based upon a formula related to real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and are generally recognized as revenues in the period in which the related costs are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not expect the actual results to materially differ from the estimated reimbursement.

Overage rent is paid by a tenant when its sales exceed an agreed-upon minimum amount. Overage rent is calculated by multiplying the sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease. Overage rent is recognized on an accrual basis once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds.

Other revenues generally consist of amounts earned by the Company for vending, advertising, and marketing revenues earned at the Company's malls and is recognized on an accrual basis over the related service period.

Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated similarly; however, it reflects potential dilution of securities by adding the incremental weighted average shares that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive securities were converted into common stock at the earliest date possible to the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, there were 3,502,581 and 3,313,869 stock options outstanding, respectively, that potentially could be converted into shares of common stock and 80,196 and 213,009 shares of non-vested restricted stock outstanding, respectively. The impact of dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock have been considered in the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The stock options and shares of restricted stock are excluded from the weighted average shares dilution computation for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as their effect is anti-dilutive.

Fair Value

The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value:

• Level 1 — quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities;

• Level 2 — observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and

• Level 3 — unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as a consideration of counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.  Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.  Accordingly, the Company's fair value estimates, which are made at the end of each reporting period, may be different than the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the sale or disposition of these assets.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's financial and non-financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis by the above categories:

	Total Fair Value Measurement			Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	(1,808	)	$	—	$	(1,808	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
December 31, 2014
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	1		$	—	$	1		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap	$	(482	)	$	—	$	(482	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	74,237		$	—	$	—		$	74,237

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾ The carrying value includes each mall's respective land, building, and in-place lease value.

The following is a reconciliation of the carrying value of properties that were impaired and disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

	Collin Creek Mall (1)(2)			Steeplegate Mall (1)(2)
	(In thousands)
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2015	$	51,767		$	22,659
Capital expenditures	—			—
Depreciation and amortization expense	(539		)	(219		)
Loss on impairment of real estate	(2,900		)	—
Disposition of real estate asset	(48,328		)	(22,440		)
Ending carrying value, September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ The carrying value includes the mall's respective land, building, in place lease value, and above and below market lease value.

⁽²⁾ The property was conveyed to its mortgage lender during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

The Company estimates fair value relating to impairment assessments utilizing a direct capitalization rate on forecasted net operating income or discounted cash flows that include all projected cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. Such projected cash flows are comprised of contractual rental revenues and forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are based on a reasonable range of current market rates for each property analyzed. The determination of which method to use is based on expected market conditions specific to the property being assessed. Based upon these inputs, the Company determined that its valuation of a property using a discounted cash flow model was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company uses interest rate swaps and caps to mitigate the effect of interest rate movements on its variable-rate debt. The Company has one interest rate cap and two interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2015 and the interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting. The interest rate swaps have met the effectiveness test criteria since inception and changes in their fair value are reported in "Other comprehensive income/(loss)" ("OCI/L") and are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The interest rate cap did not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in its fair value are reported in earnings during the period incurred. The fair value of the Company's interest rate hedges, classified under Level 2, are determined based on prevailing market data for contracts with matching durations, current and anticipated LIBOR information, consideration of the Company's credit standing, credit risk of the counterparty, and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions. See Note 7 for additional information regarding the Company's interest rate hedging instruments.

The Company's financial instruments are short term in nature and as such their fair values approximate their carrying amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets except for debt. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, management’s estimates of fair value are presented below. The Company estimated the fair value of the debt by using a future discounted cash flow analysis based on the use and weighting of multiple market inputs. As a result of the frequency and availability of market data, the inputs used to measure the estimated fair value of debt are Level 3 inputs. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. 

	September 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Fixed-rate debt	$	1,170,180	$	1,211,570	$	1,249,195	$	1,248,928
Variable-rate debt	467,250		468,400		335,304		336,791
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430	$	1,679,970	$	1,584,499	$	1,585,719

Deferred Expenses

Deferred expenses are comprised of deferred lease costs incurred in connection with obtaining new tenants or renewals of lease agreements with current tenants, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases and included in "Depreciation and amortization" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Deferred financing costs are amortized on a straight-line basis (which approximates the effective interest method) over the lives of the related mortgages, notes, and loans payable and are included in "Interest expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The following table summarizes our deferred lease and financing costs:

	Gross Asset		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Deferred lease costs	$	58,355	$	(15,877	)	$	42,478
Deferred financing costs	15,671		(5,565		)	10,106
Total	$	74,026	$	(21,442	)	$	52,584
December 31, 2014
Deferred lease costs	$	55,647	$	(14,683	)	$	40,964
Deferred financing costs	19,151		(7,504		)	11,647
Total	$	74,798	$	(22,187	)	$	52,611

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company evaluates any potential asset retirement obligations, including those related to disposal of asbestos containing materials and environmental remediation liabilities. The Company recognizes the fair value of such obligations in the period incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be determined. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, estimated costs of environmental remediation of approximately $4.5 million have been recorded as a liability in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company reversed an environmental liability on the Boulevard Mall of $0.4 million, and is included in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Company does not believe actual remediation costs will be materially different than the estimates as of September 30, 2015.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to fair values of assets and liabilities for purposes of applying the acquisition method of accounting, the useful lives of assets, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables, impairment of long-lived assets, valuation of hedging instruments and fair value of debt. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

Discontinued Operations

Prior to 2014, the Company reclassified to discontinued operations any material operations and gains or losses on disposal related to properties that were held for sale or disposed of during the period, in accordance with the applicable accounting standards. In 2014, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity" issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"). ASU No. 2014-08 changes the definition of a discontinued operation to include only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. The Company applied the revised definition to all disposals on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This topic provides for five principles which should be followed to determine the appropriate amount and timing of revenue recognition for the transfer of goods and services to customers. The principles in this ASU should be applied to all contracts with customers regardless of industry, but specifically exclude leases. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with two transition methods of adoption allowed. Early adoption for reporting periods prior to December 15, 2016 is not permitted. On April 1, 2015, the FASB board voted to postpone the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year.  The ASU is now effective for the reporting periods after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the financial statement impact of the guidance in this ASU and determining which transition method it will utilize.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." This topic provides guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and requires related footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance in this ASU.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,” which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. For public business entities, this ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance in this ASU.

XML

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015		Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015		Sep. 30, 2014
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	$ 0.5			$ 1.5		$ 1.3
Compensation Expense - RSU	0.2		$ 0.5	0.7		$ 1.4
Unrecognized compensation cost (in dollars)	6.8			6.8
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2015	0.7			0.7
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2016	2.6			2.6
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2017	1.7			1.7
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2018	$ 1.1			$ 1.1
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Stock Based Compensation Plans
Vesting period				5 years
Shares
Granted (in shares)				1,057,000		778,498
Exercised (in shares)				(314,485)		(1,680)
Forfeited (in shares)				(527,763)		(42,120)
Expired (in shares)				(26,040)		0
Stock options outstanding at the end of the year (in shares)	3,502,581	[1]	3,313,869	3,502,581	[1]	3,313,869
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Granted (in dollars per share)				$ 17.67		$ 18.36
Exercised (in dollars per share)				15		16.48
Forfeited (in dollars per share)				16.51		15.34
Expired (in dollars per share)				18.40		0.00
Stock options outstanding, ending period (in dollars per share)	$ 16.40		$ 15.90	$ 16.40		$ 15.90
Stock options becoming fully vested and exercisable (in shares)	1,138,165			1,138,165
Intrinsic value of options vested				$ 0.2
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 15.41			$ 15.41
Weighted average contractual term				6 years 11 months 13 days

[1] (1) As of September 30, 2015, 1,138,165 stock options are fully vested and are currently exercisable. As of September 30, 2015, the intrinsic value of these options was $0.2 million, and such stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $15.41 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.0 years.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Asset Retirement Obligations)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Asset Retirement Obligations
Preliminary estimate of the cost of the environmental remediation liability		$ 4,532	$ 4,545
Asset Retirement Reversal	$ (400)

XML

DERIVATIVES (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Derivative [Line Items]

Schedule of Derivative Instruments in Statement of Financial Position, Fair Value [Table Text Block]

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Instrument Type	Location in consolidated balance sheets	Notional Amount		Designated Benchmark Interest Rate	Strike Rate		Fair Value at September 30, 2015			Fair Value at December 31, 2014			Maturity Date
Derivative not designated as hedging instruments		(dollars in thousands)
Interest Rate Cap	Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	$	66,500	One-month LIBOR	4.50	%	$	—		$	1		May 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$	173,250	One-month LIBOR	Various		$	(1,808	)	$	(482	)	Various

Schedule of Derivatives Instruments Statements of Financial Performance and Financial Position, Location [Table Text Block]

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

							Location of Losses Reclassified from OCI/L Into Earnings (Effective Portion)					Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)
Hedging Instrument	Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI/L (Effective Portion)							Loss Recognized in Earnings (Effective Portion)					Gain Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)
	2015			2014				2015		2014			2015		2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	$	(1,288	)	$	224		Interest expense	$	196	$	200	n.a.	$	—	$	—
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	$	(1,913	)	$	(756	)	Interest expense	$	587	$	526	n.a.	$	—	$	—

Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]

Derivative [Line Items]

Schedule of Notional Amounts of Outstanding Derivative Positions [Table Text Block]

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative	Number of Instruments	Notional Amount
		(in thousands)
Interest rate swaps	2	$173,250

Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]

Derivative [Line Items]

Schedule of Notional Amounts of Outstanding Derivative Positions [Table Text Block]

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding derivative that was not designated as a hedge in qualifying hedging relationships:

Interest Rate Derivative	Number of Instruments	Notional Amount
		(in thousands)
Interest rate cap	1	$66,500

XML

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES, NET (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Current [Abstract]

Summary of the significant components of accounts payable and accrued expenses, net

The following table summarizes the significant components of accounts payable and accrued expenses, net:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Below market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$	38,831	$	43,292
Construction payable	23,201		16,272
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	11,672		9,901
Accrued real estate taxes	11,374		9,028
Accrued dividend	10,512		9,885
Accrued interest	6,586		4,380
Accrued payroll and other employee liabilities	6,447		9,352
Deferred income	4,989		5,471
Asset retirement obligation liability	4,532		4,545
Tenants and other deposits	1,649		1,336
Other	3,862		514
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$	123,655	$	113,976

XML

DERIVATIVES (Interest Rate Derivative Not Designated as Cash Flow Hedge) (Details) - Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] - Interest Rate Swap [Member] - Cash Flow Hedging [Member] $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Number of Instruments	2
Notional Amount	$ 173,250
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Number of Instruments	1
Notional Amount	$ 66,500

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Schedule of Acquistions) (Details)					1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
		May. 22, 2015	Jan. 28, 2015	Aug. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) ft²	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($) ft²	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)	Aug. 29, 2014
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Long-term Debt						$ 1,637,430,000		$ 1,637,430,000		$ 1,584,499,000
Controlling interest percentage											51.00%
Retail Site [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Square Footage Acquired | ft²								822,459,000	1,741,046
Purchase Price								$ 155,100,000	$ 230,767,000
Fig Garden Village [Member] | Retail Site [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Date Acquired					Jun. 03, 2015
Square Footage Acquired | ft²	[1],[2]							301,459,000
Purchase Price	[3]							$ 106,100,000
Long-term Debt						$ 74,200,000		$ 74,200,000
Interest rate						4.14%		4.14%
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate Terms						P5Y
Amortization term										30 years
Mt. Shasta Mall [Member] | Retail Site [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Date Acquired			Jan. 28, 2015
Square Footage Acquired | ft²	[1],[4]							521,000,000
Purchase Price	[1],[4]							$ 49,000,000
Long-term Debt						$ 31,900,000		$ 31,900,000
Interest rate						4.19%		4.19%
Bel Air Mall [Member] | Retail Site [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Date Acquired		May 22, 2014
Square Footage Acquired | ft²	[1],[4]								1,004,439
Purchase Price	[1],[4]								$ 131,917,000
Long term debt, assumed						$ 112,500,000		$ 112,500,000
Interest rate						5.30%		5.30%
Amortization term										30 years
The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member] | Retail Site [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Date Acquired				Aug. 29, 2014
Square Footage Acquired | ft²	[3]								736,607
Purchase Price	[3]								$ 98,850,000
Acquired interest						100.00%		100.00%
Long term debt, assumed										$ 67,000,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate Terms							P3Y
Amortization term										30 years
Controlling interest percentage										51.00%
Retail Site [Member] | The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Interest rate										4.29%
Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Amortization term								30 years

[1] Rouse acquired a 100% interest in the mall.

[2] The Company closed on a new $74.2 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.14%, matures in June 2025, is interest only for the first five years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

[3] Rouse acquired a 51% controlling interest in the mall and related properties. In conjunction with the closing of this transaction, the Company closed on a new $67.0 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.29%, matures in September 2024, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over a 30 years thereafter. See Note 12 for further details.

[4] (2) The Company closed on a new $31.9 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.19%, matures in March 2025, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

XML

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Summary of stock options activity for the equity plan

The following tables summarize stock option activity for the Equity Plan for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015			2014
	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Stock options outstanding at January 1,	3,313,869		$15.89	2,579,171		$15.14
Granted	1,057,000		17.67	778,498		18.36
Exercised	(314,485	)	15.01	(1,680	)	16.48
Forfeited	(527,763	)	16.51	(42,120	)	15.34
Expired	(26,040	)	18.40	—		—
Stock options outstanding at September 30,	3,502,581		$16.40	3,313,869		$15.90

Summary of stock options outstanding by issuance period

	Stock Options Outstanding (1)
Issuance	Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price
March 2012	1,108,860	6.50	$14.72
August 2012	36,400	6.92	13.75
October 2012	276,623	7.08	14.47
February 2013	538,600	7.42	16.48
February 2014	596,400	8.42	18.40
July 2014	28,198	8.83	17.20
February 2015	717,500	9.42	17.18
March 2015	200,000	9.50	19.76
Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2015	3,502,581	7.81	$16.40

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾As of September 30, 2015, 1,138,165 stock options are fully vested and are currently exercisable. As of September 30, 2015, the intrinsic value of these options was $0.2 million, and such stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $15.41 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.0 years.

Summary of restricted stock activity

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015			2014
	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested restricted stock grants outstanding at January 1,	205,731		$15.45	278,617		$14.85
Granted	53,550		17.18	42,489		18.40
Forfeited	(58,242	)	15.41	—		—
Vested	(120,843	)	15.33	(108,097	)	15.05
Non-vested restricted stock grants outstanding at September 30,	80,196		$16.82	213,009		$15.45

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss)

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) used in basic and diluted EPS calculations (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015		2014
Net income (loss)	$	(1,412	)	$	(26,372	)	$	42,318	$	(38,971	)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	110			(194		)	100		(194		)
Income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders and Participating Security Holders	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,418	$	(39,165	)
Earnings allocable to common shares:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,425	$	(39,165	)
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	57,930,453			57,519,412			57,756,035		57,062,578
Add: effect of assumed shares issued under treasury stock method for stock options and restricted shares	—			—			365,314		—
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	57,930,453			57,519,412			58,121,349		57,062,578
Basic and Diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73	$	(0.69	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73	$	(0.69	)
Earnings allocable to Participating Security Holders:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to Participating Security Holders	$	—		$	—		$	267	$	—
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	57,930,453			57,519,412			57,756,035		57,062,578
Add: effect of assumed shares issued under treasury stock method for stock options and restricted shares	—			—			365,314		—
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	57,930,453			57,519,412			58,121,349		57,062,578
Basic and Diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- basic	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- diluted	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—

XML

ORGANIZATION

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION

Readers of this Quarterly Report should refer to the Company’s (as defined below) audited Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”), as certain footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate those contained in the Annual Report have been omitted from this Quarterly Report.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation (which include only normal recurring adjustments) have been included in this Quarterly Report.

Capitalized terms used, but not defined in this Quarterly Report, have the same meanings as in the Annual Report.

General

Rouse Properties, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that was created to hold certain assets and liabilities of General Growth Properties, Inc. ("GGP"). Prior to January 12, 2012, Rouse Properties, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Rouse" or the "Company") were a wholly-owned subsidiary of GGP Limited Partnership (“GGP LP”). GGP distributed the assets and liabilities of 30 of its wholly-owned properties (“RPI Businesses”) to Rouse on January 12, 2012 (the “Spin-Off Date”). Before the spin-off, the Company had not conducted any business as a separate company and had no material assets or liabilities. The operations, assets and liabilities of the business were transferred to the Company by GGP on the Spin-Off Date and are presented as if the transferred business was our business for all historical periods prior to the Spin-Off Date. As such, the Company's assets and liabilities on the Spin-Off Date were reflective of GGP's respective carrying values. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Rouse.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rouse, as well as all subsidiaries of Rouse and all joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. For consolidated joint ventures, the non-controlling partner’s share of the assets, liabilities and operations of the joint ventures (generally computed as the joint venture partner’s ownership percentage) is included in non-controlling interests as permanent equity of the Company. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation as of and for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

The Company operates in a single reportable segment referred to as its retail segment, which includes the operation, development and management of regional malls. Each of the Company's operating properties is considered a separate operating segment, as each property earns revenues and incurs expenses, individual operating results are reviewed and discrete financial information is available. The Company does not distinguish its operations based on geography, size or type and all operations are within the United States. No customer or tenant comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues, and the properties have similar economic characteristics.

XML

ORGANIZATION (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015 segment property	Jul. 01, 2014 shares
Organization [Line Items]
Number of Operating Segments | segment	1
Segment Reporting, Disclosure of Major Customers	.1
GGP [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Number of properties assets and liabilities are split over | property	30
Employee Stock [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Number of Shares Authorized		500,000

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICIANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Schedule of Reconciliation of Carrying Value of Properties) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Depreciation and amortization expense		$ 222,050		$ 222,050		$ 189,838
Loss on impairment of real estate		0	$ (10,665)	(2,900)	$ (10,665)
Steeplegate Mall [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2014	[1]			22,659
Capital expenditures	[1]			0
Real Estate, Depreciation and Amortization Expense	[1]			(219)
Loss on impairment of real estate	[1]			0
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2014	[1]	0		0
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2014	[2]			51,767
Capital expenditures	[2]			0
Real Estate, Depreciation and Amortization Expense	[2]			(539)
Loss on impairment of real estate	[2]			(2,900)
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2014	[2]	$ 0		0
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Assets	[1]			(48,328)
Steeplegate Mall [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Assets	[1]			$ (22,440)

[1] (2) The property was conveyed to its mortgage lender during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

[2] The carrying value includes each mall's respective land, building, and in-place lease value.

XML

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES, NET (Details) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Jul. 30, 2015	May. 04, 2015	Feb. 28, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Current [Abstract]
Below market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$ 38,831,000				$ 43,292,000
Construction payable	23,201,000				16,272,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	11,672,000				9,901,000
Dividends Payable	10,512,000	$ 0.18	$ 0.18	$ 0.18	9,885,000	$ 9,885,000
Accrued interest	6,586,000				4,380,000
Accrued real estate taxes	11,374,000				9,028,000
Deferred income	4,989,000				5,471,000
Accrued payroll and other employee liabilities	6,447,000				9,352,000
Tenant and other deposits	1,649,000				1,336,000
Asset retirement obligation liability	4,532,000				4,545,000
Other	3,862,000				514,000
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$ 123,655,000				$ 113,976,000

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Investment in real estate:
Land	$ 378,855	$ 371,363
Buildings and equipment	1,964,294	1,820,072
Less accumulated depreciation	(222,050)	(189,838)
Net investment in real estate	2,121,099	2,001,597
Cash and cash equivalents	6,277	14,308
Restricted cash	40,521	48,055
Accounts receivable, net	36,979	35,492
Deferred expenses, net	52,584	52,611
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	52,145	62,690
Real Estate Assets Held for Development and Sale	0	55,647
Total assets	2,309,605	2,270,400
Liabilities:
Mortgages, notes and loans payable	1,637,430	1,584,499
Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	123,655	113,976
Disposal Group, Including Discontinued Operation, Liabilities, Current	0	38,590
Total liabilities	1,761,085	1,737,065
Commitments and contingencies	0	0
Equity:
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	0	0
Common stock	580	578
Additional paid-in capital	654,304	679,275
Accumulated deficit	(120,463)	(162,881)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax	(1,809)	(482)
Total stockholders' equity	532,612	516,490
Non-controlling interest	15,908	16,845
Total equity	548,520	533,335
Total liabilities and equity	$ 2,309,605	$ 2,270,400

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Additional Information) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles	$ (4,720)	$ (14,989)
Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles	(1,813)
Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles	(2,907)
Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles		(6,889)
The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles		(8,100)
Land
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	26,583	26,938
Land | Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	7,809
Land | Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	18,774
Land | Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		8,969
Land | The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		17,969
Building and improvements
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	117,536	187,155
Building and improvements | Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	38,008
Building and improvements | Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	79,528
Building and improvements | Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		111,206
Building and improvements | The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		75,949
Other
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	(334)	4,709
Other | Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	302
Other | Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	(636)
Other | Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		3,350
Other | The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		1,359
Leases, Acquired-in-Place
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	11,145	18,302
Leases, Acquired-in-Place | Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	3,779
Leases, Acquired-in-Place | Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	7,366
Leases, Acquired-in-Place | Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		11,329
Leases, Acquired-in-Place | The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		6,973
Above-market tenant leases, net
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	4,890	8,652
Above-market tenant leases, net | Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	915
Above-market tenant leases, net | Fig Garden Village [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price	$ 3,975
Above-market tenant leases, net | Bel Air Mall [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		3,952
Above-market tenant leases, net | The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Purchase Price		$ 4,700

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid	$ 0	$ 0.13
Underwriting Discount	$ 0	$ 6,279
Common Stock [Member]
Underwriting Discount	$ 6,200
Common Stock [Member] | Common Class A [Member]
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid		$ 0.17

XML

DISPOSITIONS OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS (Details) - USD ($)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Gain (Loss) on extinguishment of debt		$ (67,000)	$ 0	$ 26,827,000	$ 0
Knollwood Mall [Member]
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Gross proceeds	$ 106,700,000
Mortgage debt	35,100,000
Gain on disposition	32,500,000
Escrow Deposit	$ 7,900,000
Steeplegate Mall [Member]
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Net outstanding balance		45,900,000		45,900,000
Gain (Loss) on extinguishment of debt				22.8
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Net outstanding balance		$ 57,600,000		57,600,000
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Gain (Loss) on extinguishment of debt				$ 4,100,000.0

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Intangible Assets and Liabilities)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Intangible assets and liabilities
Net Carrying Amount	$ (38,831)		$ (38,831)		$ (43,292)
Amortization of Intangible Assets	4,400	$ 7,200	15,200	$ 19,100
Amortization of intangible assets and liabilities	1,300	$ 2,400	5,400	$ 9,800
Estimated decrease to income due to future amortization
Remainder of 2015	5,375		5,375
2015	14,036		14,036
2016	8,265		8,265
2017	5,678		5,678
2018	3,988		3,988
2019	3,049		3,049
Future Amortization and Accretion Expense Future Amortization [Abstract]
Remainder of 2015	1,780		1,780
2015	5,254		5,254
2016	3,411		3,411
2017	989		989
2018	(500)		(500)
2019	(995)		(995)
Tenant leases
Intangible assets and liabilities
Gross Liability	(62,030)		(62,030)		(65,476)
Accumulated Accretion	23,199		23,199		22,184
Net Carrying Amount	(38,831)		(38,831)		(43,292)
Tenant leases | Leases, Acquired-in-Place
Intangible assets and liabilities
Gross Assets	90,527		90,527		97,745
Accumulated Amortization	(41,165)		(41,165)		(43,481)
Net Carrying Amount	49,362		49,362		54,264
Tenant leases | Above-market tenant leases, net
Intangible assets and liabilities
Gross Assets	99,617		99,617		109,862
Accumulated Amortization	(57,768)		(57,768)		(58,866)
Net Carrying Amount	41,849		41,849		50,996
Ground leases
Intangible assets and liabilities
Gross Assets	3,682		3,682		3,682
Accumulated Amortization	(653)		(653)		(537)
Net Carrying Amount	$ 3,029		$ 3,029		$ 3,145

XML

NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST (Details) - $ / shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Aug. 29, 2014	Jun. 29, 2012
Non-controlling interest
Controlling interest percentage		51.00%
Holdings | Preferred Shares
Non-controlling interest
Number of preferred shares issued (in shares)			111
Par value of shares (in dollars per share)			$ 1,000
Cumulative preferential annual cash dividend (as a percent)	12.50%
Redemption price (in dollars per share)	$ 1,000
Liquidation preference (in dollars per share)	$ 1,000

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 8, 2015, the loan associated with Greenville Mall, located in Greenville, NC was refinanced with a new non-recourse mortgage loan for $45.5 million. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of of 4.46%, matures in November 2025, and amortizes over 30 years. This loan replaced a $40.2 million non-recourse mortgage loan which had a fixed interest rate of 5.29%.

On October 8, 2015, the loan associated with The Shoppes at Bel Air located in Mobile, AL was refinanced with a new non-recourse mortgage loan for $120.0 million. The initial funding of $110.5 million was used to retire the outstanding mortgage loan of $109.5 million, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.30%. The loan provides for an additional subsequent funding of $9.5 million upon achieving certain conditions. The loan bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR (30 day) plus 235 basis points, is interest only for the first two years, and has a fixed amortization thereafter. The loan has a term of three years, with twoone-year extension options subject to achieving certain conditions. The borrower entered into an interest swap commencing January 2016 which fixes the interest rate at 3.34%, through September 2018.

On October 29, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized management to implement a Stock Repurchase Program in the maximum amount of $50.0 million over a period of up to two years. Purchases made pursuant to the Stock Repurchase Program will be made in the open market from time to time as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements.  The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company in its discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors.  The Stock Repurchase Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.

On October 29, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which will be paid on January 29, 2016 to stockholders of record on January 15, 2016.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Interest Rate Hedging Instruments) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Cash Flow Hedging [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Liability	$ 1,800
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Liability	$ 1,808	$ 482
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] | Cash Flow Hedging [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Derivative Liability, Fair Value		$ 482

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Schedule of estimated useful lives

Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based upon the following estimated useful lives:

	Years
Buildings and improvements	40
Equipment and fixtures	5 - 10
Tenant improvements	Shorter of useful life or applicable lease term

Schedule of intangible assets and liabilities

The following table summarizes our intangible assets and liabilities as a result of the application of acquisition accounting:

	Gross Asset (Liability)			Accumulated (Amortization)/ Accretion			Net Carrying Amount
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Tenant leases:
In-place value	$	90,527		$	(41,165	)	$	49,362
Above-market	99,617			(57,768		)	41,849
Below-market	(62,030		)	23,199			(38,831		)
Ground leases:
Below-market	3,682			(653		)	3,029
December 31, 2014
Tenant leases:
In-place value	$	97,745		$	(43,481	)	$	54,264
Above-market	109,862			(58,866		)	50,996
Below-market	(65,476		)	22,184			(43,292		)
Ground leases:
Below-market	3,682			(537		)	3,145

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

Future amortization/accretion of these intangibles is estimated to decrease the Company's net income as follows:

Year	In-place lease intangibles		Above/(below) market leases, net
	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2015	$	5,375	$	1,780
2016	14,036		5,254
2017	8,265		3,411
2018	5,678		989
2019	3,988		(500		)
2020	3,049		(995		)

Summary of amortization of straight-line rent, lease termination income, net amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases, amortization of tenant inducements, and percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent

The following is a summary of amortization of straight-line rent, lease termination income, net amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases, amortization of tenant inducements, and percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent amortization	$	422		$	97		$	744		$	1,184
Lease termination income	187			901			825			1,356
Net amortization of above and below-market tenant leases	(1,252		)	(2,433		)	(5,434		)	(9,829		)
Amortization of tenant inducements	(89		)	(11		)	(107		)	(21		)
Percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent	1,844			1,691			4,842			4,659

Schedule of straight-line rent receivables

The following is a summary of straight-line rent receivables, which are included in "Accounts receivable, net," in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reduced for allowances for doubtful accounts:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net	$	14,384	$	14,431

Schedule of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's financial and non-financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis by the above categories:

	Total Fair Value Measurement			Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	(1,808	)	$	—	$	(1,808	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
December 31, 2014
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	1		$	—	$	1		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap	$	(482	)	$	—	$	(482	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	74,237		$	—	$	—		$	74,237

Schedule of Reconciliation of Carrying Value of Properties

The following is a reconciliation of the carrying value of properties that were impaired and disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

	Collin Creek Mall (1)(2)			Steeplegate Mall (1)(2)
	(In thousands)
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2015	$	51,767		$	22,659
Capital expenditures	—			—
Depreciation and amortization expense	(539		)	(219		)
Loss on impairment of real estate	(2,900		)	—
Disposition of real estate asset	(48,328		)	(22,440		)
Ending carrying value, September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Explanatory Notes:

Schedule of fair value of financial instruments

The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. 

	September 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Fixed-rate debt	$	1,170,180	$	1,211,570	$	1,249,195	$	1,248,928
Variable-rate debt	467,250		468,400		335,304		336,791
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430	$	1,679,970	$	1,584,499	$	1,585,719

Summary of deferred lease and financing costs

	Gross Asset		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Deferred lease costs	$	58,355	$	(15,877	)	$	42,478
Deferred financing costs	15,671		(5,565		)	10,106
Total	$	74,026	$	(21,442	)	$	52,584
December 31, 2014
Deferred lease costs	$	55,647	$	(14,683	)	$	40,964
Deferred financing costs	19,151		(7,504		)	11,647
Total	$	74,798	$	(22,187	)	$	52,611

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands				3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
		Oct. 30, 2015 $ / shares	Oct. 08, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2014 $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2014 $ / shares	Oct. 29, 2015 USD ($)	Oct. 07, 2015 USD ($)	May. 04, 2015 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)	Oct. 31, 2014 USD ($)	May. 31, 2014 USD ($)
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Long-term Debt				$ 1,637,430		$ 1,637,430					$ 1,584,499
Common stock dividend declared (in dollars per share) | $ / shares				$ 0.18	$ 0.17	$ 0.54	$ 0.51
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate				21000.00%
Subsequent Event [Member]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Stock repurchase program, authorized amount								$ 50,000
Stock repurchase program, period		2 years
Common stock dividend declared (in dollars per share) | $ / shares		$ 0.18
Bay Shore Mall [Member]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Long-term Debt	[1]										$ 46,500	$ 0
Bel Air Mall [Member]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Long-term Debt										$ 112,505			$ 0
Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | GreenvilleMall [Member] | Subsequent Event [Member]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Long-term Debt			$ 45,500						$ 40,200
Interest rate			4.46%						5.29%
Amortization term			30 years
Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | Bel Air Mall [Member] | Subsequent Event [Member]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Long-term Debt			$ 120,000
Interest rate			5.30%
Long Term Debt, Initial Funding Amount			$ 110,500
Mortgage loans on real estate, face amount of mortgages									$ 109,500
Additional subsequent funding			$ 9,500
Loan term			3 years
Number of loan term extensions			2
Long Term Debt, Length of Extension			1 year
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate			2.35%
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Bel Air Mall [Member] | Subsequent Event [Member]
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Interest rate			3.34%

[1] The loan is interest-only for the first

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$ 42,318,000	$ (38,971,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts	1,317,000	659,000
Depreciation	65,488,000	65,100,000
Amortization	7,231,000	6,493,000
Amortization/write-off of deferred finance costs	3,163,000	3,420,000
Amortization/write-off of debt market rate adjustments	(721,000)	8,789,000
Amortization of above/below market leases and tenant inducements	5,551,000	9,850,000
Straight-line rent amortization	(744,000)	(1,184,000)
Provision for impairment	2,900,000	10,665,000
Gain on extinguishment of debt	26,827,000	0
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Properties	(32,496,000)	0
Stock based compensation	2,220,000	2,737,000
Net changes:
Accounts receivable	(2,874,000)	(248,000)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(261,000)	(2,795,000)
Deferred expenses	(10,335,000)	(10,854,000)
Restricted cash	329,000	782,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	5,961,000	8,524,000
Net cash provided by operating activities	62,220,000	62,967,000
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisition/development of real estate and property additions/improvements	(154,100,000)	(109,330,000)
Proceeds from Sale of Productive Assets	90,288,000	0
Payments Development, Building and Tenant Improvement	101,368,000	81,655,000
Demand deposit from affiliate	0	0
Restricted cash	3,254,000	1,458,000
Net cash used in investing activities	(161,926,000)	(189,527,000)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds received from rights offering	0	156,976,000
Underwriting Discount	0	(6,279,000)
Proceeds from Stock Options Exercised	4,117,000	28,000
Payments for offering costs	0	(467,000)
Proceeds from refinance/issuance of mortgages, notes and loans payable	245,300,000	137,000,000
Borrowing under revolving line of credit	195,500,000	45,000,000
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable	(181,719,000)	(97,319,000)
Repayments under revolving line of credit	(137,500,000)	(73,000,000)
Dividends paid	(30,679,000)	(27,152,000)
Proceeds from (Payments to) Noncontrolling Interests	(882,000)	0
Deferred financing costs	(2,462,000)	(1,164,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities	91,675,000	133,623,000
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(8,031,000)	7,063,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,308,000	14,224,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	6,277,000
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest	51,909,000	49,461,000
Capitalized interest	2,218,000	1,875,000
Non-Cash Transactions:
Change in accrued capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,819,000	(2,592,000)
Dividends declared, not yet paid	10,512,000	9,885,000
Noncash or Part Noncash Acquisition, Debt Assumed	0	112,505,000
Capitalized market rate adjustments and deferred financing amortization	252,000	281,000
Supplemental non-cash information related to acquisition accounting:
Land	0	8,969,000
Buildings and equipment, net	0	103,123,000
Deferred expenses, net	0	1,841,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets	0	5,461,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	0	(6,889,000)
Mortgages, notes and loans payable	0	(112,505,000)
Land	(18,384,000)
Buildings and equipment, net	(52,446,000)	0
Accounts receivable	(224,000)	0
Deferred expenses, net	(1,555,000)	0
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(5,588,000)	0
Mortgages, notes and loan payable	(103,545,000)	0
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$ (1,479,000)	$ 0

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Preferred Stock [Member]
Par value of shares (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred Stock, Shares Authorized (in shares)	50,000,000	50,000,000
Number of preferred shares issued (in shares)	0	0
Preferred Stock, Shares Outstanding (in shares)	0	0
Common Class A [Member]
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	58,084,620	57,748,141
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	58,022,217	57,743,981

XML

COMMON STOCK

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Equity [Abstract]

COMMON STOCK

COMMON STOCK

On January 13, 2014, the Company issued 8,050,000 shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering at a public offering price of $19.50 per share. Net proceeds of the public offering were approximately $150.7 million after deducting the underwriting discount of $6.3 million, but before deducting offering expenses.

Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, “Brookfield”) owned approximately 33.4% of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2015.

Dividends

On February 26, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a first quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on April 30, 2015 to stockholders of record on April 15, 2015.

On May 4, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a second quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on July 31, 2015 to stockholders of record on July 15, 2015.

On July 30, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors declared a third quarter common stock dividend of $0.18 per share, which was paid on October 30, 2015 to stockholders of record on October 15, 2015.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

On May 12, 2014, the Company established a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP"). Under the DRIP, the Company's stockholders may purchase additional shares of common stock by automatically reinvesting all or a portion of the cash dividends paid on their shares of common stock or by making optional cash payments, or both, at fees described in the DRIP prospectus. The DRIP commenced with the dividend paid on July 31, 2014 to stockholders of record on July 15, 2014. To date, the Company has purchased the shares needed to satisfy the DRIP elections in the open market. No additional shares have been issued.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On July 1, 2014, the Company commenced enrollment under its Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"). The ESPP was implemented to provide eligible employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries with an opportunity to purchase common stock of the Company at a discount of 5%, through accumulated payroll deductions or other permitted contributions. The ESPP was adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on February 27, 2014 and approved by its stockholders on May 9, 2014. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the ESPP is 500,000 subject to adjustments under certain circumstances. As of September 30, 2015, 5,133shares have been issued under the ESPP since its commencement.

XML

DOCUMENT AND ENTITY INFORMATION - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Oct. 30, 2015
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Rouse Properties, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001528558
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2015
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2015
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding (shares)		58,022,217

XML

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

NOTE 11STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

Incentive Stock Plans

On January 12, 2012, the Company adopted the Rouse Properties, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plan"). On February 26, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors approved an amendment ("Plan Amendment") to the Equity Plan increasing the total number of shares available for issuance. On May 8, 2015, the Plan Amendment was approved by the Company's stockholders.

Stock Options

Pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company granted stock options to certain employees of the Company.  The vesting terms of these grants are specific to the individual grant.  In general, participating employees are required to remain employed for vesting to occur (subject to certain limited exceptions).  In the event that a participating employee ceases to be employed by the Company, any options that have not vested will generally be forfeited. Stock options generally vest annually over a five year period.

The following tables summarize stock option activity for the Equity Plan for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015			2014
	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Stock options outstanding at January 1,	3,313,869		$15.89	2,579,171		$15.14
Granted	1,057,000		17.67	778,498		18.36
Exercised	(314,485	)	15.01	(1,680	)	16.48
Forfeited	(527,763	)	16.51	(42,120	)	15.34
Expired	(26,040	)	18.40	—		—
Stock options outstanding at September 30,	3,502,581		$16.40	3,313,869		$15.90

	Stock Options Outstanding (1)
Issuance	Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price
March 2012	1,108,860	6.50	$14.72
August 2012	36,400	6.92	13.75
October 2012	276,623	7.08	14.47
February 2013	538,600	7.42	16.48
February 2014	596,400	8.42	18.40
July 2014	28,198	8.83	17.20
February 2015	717,500	9.42	17.18
March 2015	200,000	9.50	19.76
Stock options outstanding at September 30, 2015	3,502,581	7.81	$16.40

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾As of September 30, 2015, 1,138,165 stock options are fully vested and are currently exercisable. As of September 30, 2015, the intrinsic value of these options was $0.2 million, and such stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $15.41 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.0 years.

The Company recognized $0.5 million in compensation expense related to the stock options for each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $1.5 million and $1.3 million in compensation expense related to the stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which is recorded in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Restricted Stock

Pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company granted restricted stock to certain employees and non-employee directors.  The vesting terms of these grants are specific to the individual grant, and are generally three to four year periods. In general, participating employees are required to remain employed for vesting to occur (subject to certain limited exceptions).  In the event that a participating employee ceases to be employed by the Company, any shares that have not vested will generally be forfeited. Dividends are paid on restricted stock and are not returnable, even if the underlying stock does not ultimately vest.

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015			2014
	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested restricted stock grants outstanding at January 1,	205,731		$15.45	278,617		$14.85
Granted	53,550		17.18	42,489		18.40
Forfeited	(58,242	)	15.41	—		—
Vested	(120,843	)	15.33	(108,097	)	15.05
Non-vested restricted stock grants outstanding at September 30,	80,196		$16.82	213,009		$15.45

The weighted average remaining contractual term (in years) of granted, non-vested restricted stock awards as of September 30, 2015 was 1.0 years.

The Company recognized $0.2 million and $0.5 million in compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.4 million in compensation expense related to restricted stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which is recorded in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Other Disclosures

As of September 30, 2015, there was $6.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to all nonvested options and restricted stock grants. Of this total, $0.7 million in 2015, $2.6 million in 2016, $1.7 million in 2017, $1.1 million in 2018, $0.6 million in 2019 and $0.1 million in 2020 will be recognized, respectively, in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).  These amounts may be impacted by future grants, changes in forfeiture estimates or vesting terms, and actual forfeiture rates differing from estimated forfeiture rates.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest	$ (110)	$ 194	$ (100)	$ 194
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent	(1,302)	(26,566)	42,418	(39,165)
Revenues:
Minimum rents	52,035	51,817	154,339	144,608
Tenant recoveries	19,069	20,518	57,910	58,430
Overage rents	881	726	3,204	2,664
Other	1,568	1,722	5,070	4,711
Total revenues	73,553	74,783	220,523	210,413
Expenses:
Property operating costs	17,537	18,639	51,502	52,535
Real estate taxes	5,694	7,287	20,049	19,553
Property maintenance costs	1,864	2,394	7,558	8,170
Marketing	419	572	1,357	1,653
Provision for doubtful accounts	759	271	1,317	659
General and administrative	6,327	6,132	19,685	18,613
Impairment of Real Estate	0	10,665	2,900	10,665
Depreciation and amortization	22,856	27,130	72,719	71,593
Other	1,254	1,371	5,205	2,631
Total expenses	56,710	74,461	182,292	186,072
Operating income	16,843	322	38,231	24,341
Interest income	4	34	18	310
Interest expense	(18,110)	(26,592)	(54,745)	(63,239)
Gain (Loss) on extinguishment of debt	(67)	0	26,827	0
Provision for income taxes	(82)	(136)	(509)	(383)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before gain on sale of real estate assets	(1,412)	(26,372)	9,822	(38,971)
Gains (Losses) on Sales of Investment Real Estate	0	0	32,496	0
Loss from continuing operations	(1,412)	(26,372)	42,318	(38,971)
Discontinued operations:
Net income (loss)	$ (1,412)	$ (26,372)	$ 42,318	$ (38,971)
Earnings Per Share, Diluted	$ (0.02)		$ 0.73
Earnings Per Share, Basic	(0.02)	$ (0.46)	0.73	$ (0.69)
Dividends declared per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.18	$ 0.17	$ 0.54	$ 0.51
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instrument	$ (1,091)	$ 425	$ (1,327)	$ (230)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ (2,503)	$ (25,947)	$ 40,991	$ (39,201)

XML

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE, NET

Mortgages, notes and loans payable are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		Interest Rate at September 30, 2015		Scheduled Maturity Date
Fixed-rate debt:	(in thousands)
Steeplegate Mall	$	—	$	45,858	—	%	—
Bel Air Mall (1)	109,618		111,276		5.30		December 2015
Greenville Mall	39,995		40,602		5.29		December 2015
Vista Ridge Mall	66,361		68,537		6.87		April 2016
Washington Park Mall	—		10,505		—		—
The Centre at Salisbury(2)	115,000		115,000		5.79		May 2016
The Mall at Turtle Creek	76,883		77,648		6.54		June 2016
Collin Creek Mall	—		58,128		—		—
Grand Traverse Mall	—		59,479		—		—
West Valley Mall (3)	59,000		59,000		3.24		September 2018
Pierre BossierMall	46,071		46,654		4.94		May 2022
Pierre Bossier Anchor	3,573		3,637		4.85		May 2022
Southland Center (MI)	75,123		76,037		5.09		July 2022
Chesterfield Towne Center	106,820		107,967		4.75		October 2022
Animas Valley Mall	49,386		50,053		4.41		November 2022
Lakeland Square	67,131		68,053		4.17		April 2023
Valley Hills Mall	65,651		66,492		4.47		July 2023
Chula Vista Center (1)(4)	70,000		70,000		4.18		July 2024
The Mall at Barnes Crossing (1)	67,000		67,000		4.29		September 2024
Bayshore Mall (1)	46,500		46,500		3.96		October 2024
Mt. Shasta Mall (1)	31,850		—		4.19		March 2025
Fig Garden Village (1)	74,200		—		4.14		June 2025
Total fixed-rate debt	$	1,170,162	$	1,248,426
Add: Market rate adjustments	18		769
	$	1,170,180	$	1,249,195
Variable-rate debt:
NewPark Mall (1)(5)	$	114,250	$	65,304	2.44	%	September 2018
2013 Term Loan(6)(7)	285,000		260,000		2.29		November 2018
2013 Revolver (6)(7)	68,000		10,000		2.30		November 2017
Total variable-rate debt	$	467,250	$	335,304
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430	$	1,584,499

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ See the significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions table below, under "—Property-Level Debt" in this Note 5 for additional information regarding the debt related to each property.

⁽²⁾ The Company guaranteed a maximum amount of $3.5 million until certain financial covenants are met for two consecutive years.

⁽³⁾ During January 2014, the Company entered into a swap transaction which fixes the interest rate on the loan for this property at 3.24%, through June 2018. See Note 7 for further details.

⁽⁴⁾ On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center from the 2013 Senior Facility (as defined below) collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on Chula Vista Center. Sikes Senter debt was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing, and upon repayment, Sikes was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool balance.

⁽⁵⁾ LIBOR (90 day) plus 210 basis points. The Company entered into a fixed swap which fixes the interest rate at 3.26% beginning January 2016, through September 2018.

⁽⁶⁾ LIBOR (30 day) plus 210 basis points.

⁽⁷⁾ On June 30, 2015, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion feature" on the 2013 Senior Facility, increasing the 2013 Term Loan (as defined below) from $260.0 million to $285.0 million and increasing the availability on the 2013 Revolver (as defined below) from $285.0 million to $310.0 million.

Property-Level Debt

The Company had individual property-level debt (the “Property-Level Debt”) on 18 of its 35 assets, totaling $1.28 billion (excluding $0.02 million of market rate adjustments) as of September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Property-Level Debt had a weighted average interest rate of 4.69% and an average remaining term of 4.9 years. The Property-Level Debt is generally non-recourse to the Company and is stand-alone (i.e., not cross-collateralized) first mortgage debt with the exception of customary recourse guarantees.

The following is a summary of significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions that have occurred during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

Property	Date	Balance at Date of Refinancing		Interest Rate		Balance of New Loan		New Interest Rate		Net Proceeds (1)		Maturity
September 30, 2015:
NewPark Mall (2)(3)	September 2015	$	64,665	3.44	%	$	114,250	2.44	%	$	47,942	September 2018
Fig Garden Village (4)	June 2015	—		—	%	74,200		4.14	%	—		June 2025
Mt. Shasta Mall (3)	February 2015	—		—	%	31,850		4.19	%	—		March 2025
December 31, 2014:
Bayshore Mall (3)	October 2014	$	—	—	%	$	46,500	3.96	%	$	43,400	October 2024
The Mall at Barnes Crossing (3)	August 2014	—		—	%	67,000		4.29	%	—		September 2024
Chula Vista Center (5)	July 2014	—		—	%	70,000		4.18	%	15,000		July 2024
Sikes Senter (5)	July 2014	54,618		5.20	%	—		—	%	—		—
Bel Air Mall	May 2014	—		—	%	112,505		5.30	%	—		December 2015

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Net proceeds are net of closing costs.

⁽²⁾ In September 2015, the loan associated with NewPark Mall was refinanced for $135.0 million, with an initial funding of $114.3 million. The loan provides for an additional funding of up to $20.8 million upon achieving certain conditions.  The loan has a term of three years with a one year extension option subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. A swap will be effective on this loan beginning January 1, 2016, which fixes the interest rate at 3.26%, through September 2018.

⁽³⁾ The loan is interest-only for the first three years.

⁽⁴⁾ The loan is interest-only for the first five years.

⁽⁵⁾ On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center, located in Chula Vista, CA, from the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on the property. Sikes Senter, located in Wichita Falls, TX, had an outstanding mortgage loan which was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing. Upon repayment, Sikes Senter was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility balance.

In January 2015, the loan associated with The Shoppes at Knollwood with a mortgage debt balance of $35.1 million was defeased simultaneously with the sale of the property. As of December 31, 2014, the loan was shown as a component of "Liabilities of property held for sale" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In February 2015, the Company repaid the $10.4 million mortgage debt balance on Washington Park Mall, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.35%.

In February 2015, the loan associated with Vista Ridge Mall was transferred to special servicing.

In March 2015, the property associated with Steeplegate Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $45.9 million.

In April 2015, the property associated with Collin Creek Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $57.6 million.

On July 1, 2015, the Company repaid the $59.0 million mortgage debt balance on Grand Traverse Mall, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.02% On July 29, 2015, Grand Traverse Mall was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool.

Corporate Facility

2013 Senior Facility

On November 22, 2013, the Company entered into a $510.0 million secured credit facility that provides borrowings on a revolving basis of up to $250.0 million (the "2013 Revolver") and a $260.0 million senior secured term loan (the "2013 Term Loan" and together with the 2013 Revolver, the "2013 Senior Facility"). Borrowings on the 2013 Senior Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 185 to 300 basis points based on the Company's corporate leverage. The Company has the option, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, to exercise an "accordion" feature to increase the commitments under the 2013 Revolver and/or incur additional term loans in the aggregate amount of $250.0 million such that the aggregate amount of the commitments and outstanding loans under the 2013 Secured Facility does not exceed $760.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion" feature on the 2013 Senior Facility to increase the available borrowings of the 2013 Revolver thereunder from $250.0 million to $285.0 million.

During the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015, through an amendment to the 2013 Senior Facility, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion" feature which increased the aggregate amount of commitments under the 2013 Senior Facility from $545.0 million to $595.0 million. The exercise increased availability on the 2013 Revolver from $285.0 million to $310.0 million and increased the 2013 Term Loan from $260.0 million to $285.0 million. The term and rates of the Company's 2013 Senior Facility were otherwise unchanged.

The 2013 Revolver has an initial term of four years with a one year extension option and the 2013 Term Loan has a term of five years. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had drawn $68.0 million on the 2013 Revolver. The Company is required to pay an unused fee related to the 2013 Revolver equal to 0.20% per year if the aggregate unused amount is greater than or equal to 50% of the 2013 Revolver or 0.30% per year if the aggregate unused amount is less than 50% of the 2013 Revolver.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of unused fees related to the 2013 Revolver. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of unused fees related to the 2013 Revolver. Under the 2013 Revolver, letters of credit totaling $0.9 million were outstanding as of September 30, 2015 in connection with two properties. Additionally, the Company had $0.06 million of letters of credit outstanding in relation to The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.01 million and $0.07 million, respectively, of letter of credit fees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $0.03 million and $0.09 million, respectively, of letter of credit fees.

The 2013 Senior Facility contains representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and defaults that are customary for such a real estate loan. In addition, the 2013 Senior Facility requires compliance with certain financial covenants, including borrowing base loan to value and debt yield, corporate maximum leverage ratio, minimum ratio of adjusted consolidated earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization to fixed charges, minimum tangible net worth, minimum mortgaged property requirement, maximum unhedged variable rate debt and maximum recourse indebtedness. Failure to comply with the covenants in the 2013 Senior Facility would result in a default thereunder and, absent a waiver or an amendment from our lenders, permit the acceleration of all outstanding borrowings under the 2013 Senior Facility. The default interest rate following a payment event of default under the 2013 Senior Facility is 3.0% more than the then-applicable interest rate. No assurance can be given that the Company would be successful in obtaining such waiver or amendment in this current financial climate, or that any accommodations that the Company was able to negotiate would be on terms as favorable as those in the 2013 Senior Facility. In December 2014, the Company entered into an amendment of the 2013 Senior Facility whereby certain modifications were made to the financial covenant calculations. As of September 30, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of the debt covenants related to the 2013 Senior Facility.

As of September 30, 2015, $2.19 billion of land, buildings and equipment (before accumulated depreciation) have been pledged as collateral for our mortgages, notes and loans payable. Certain mortgage notes payable may be prepaid but are generally subject to a prepayment penalty equal to a yield-maintenance premium, defeasance or a percentage of the loan balance.

The weighted-average interest rate on our collateralized mortgages, notes and loans payable was approximately 4.17% and 4.64% as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The average remaining term was 4.5 and 4.7 years as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Prepaid Expense and Other Assets [Abstract]

PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

The following table summarizes the significant components of prepaid expenses and other assets, net:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Above-market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$	41,849	$	50,996
Prepaid expenses	6,370		4,755
Below-market ground leases, net (Note 2)	3,029		3,145
Deposits	528		1,447
Other	369		2,347
Total prepaid expenses and other assets, net	$	52,145	$	62,690

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Properties

Properties

Acquisition accounting was applied to real estate assets within the Rouse portfolio either when GGP emerged from bankruptcy in November 2010 or upon any subsequent acquisition. After acquisition accounting is applied, the real estate assets are carried at their cost basis less accumulated depreciation. Real estate taxes and interest costs incurred during development periods are capitalized. Capitalized interest costs are based on qualified expenditures and interest rates in place during the development period. Capitalized real estate taxes, interest and interest related costs are amortized over lives which are consistent with the developed assets.

Pre-development costs, which generally include legal and professional fees and other directly-related third party costs, are capitalized as part of the property being developed. In the event a development is no longer deemed to be probable, the costs previously capitalized are expensed.

Tenant improvements, either paid directly or in the form of construction allowances paid to tenants, are capitalized and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life or applicable lease term. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for significant betterments and improvements are capitalized. In leasing tenant space, the Company may provide funding to the lessee through a tenant allowance. In accounting for a tenant allowance, the Company determines whether the allowance represents funding for the construction of leasehold improvements and evaluates the ownership of such improvements. If the Company is considered the owner of the leasehold improvements for accounting purposes, it capitalizes the amount of the tenant allowance and depreciates it over the shorter of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the related lease term. If the tenant allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event that the Company is not considered the owner of the improvements for accounting purposes, the allowance is capitalized as a lease incentive and is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis.

Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method based upon the following estimated useful lives:

	Years
Buildings and improvements	40
Equipment and fixtures	5 - 10
Tenant improvements	Shorter of useful life or applicable lease term

Impairment

Impairment

Operating properties and intangible assets

Accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets requires that if impairment indicators exist and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset are less than its carrying amount, an impairment provision should be recorded to write down the carrying amount of such asset to its fair value. The Company reviews all real estate assets for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each property and include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in real estate property net operating income and occupancy percentages, high loan to value ratios, and carrying values in excess of the fair values. Impairment indicators for pre-development costs, which are typically costs incurred during the beginning stages of a potential development and developments in progress, are assessed by project and include, but are not limited to, significant changes to the Company’s plans with respect to the project, significant changes in projected completion dates, revenues or cash flows, development costs, market factors and sustainability of development projects.

If an indicator of potential impairment exists, the asset is tested for recoverability by comparing its carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. The cash flow estimates used both for determining recoverability and estimating fair value are inherently judgmental and reflect current and projected trends in rental, occupancy and capitalization rates, and estimated holding periods for the applicable assets. Although the estimated fair value of certain assets may exceed the carrying amount, a real estate asset is only considered to be impaired when its carrying amount cannot be recovered through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent a provision for impairment is determined to be necessary, the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value is expensed to operations. The adjusted carrying amount, which represents the new cost basis of the asset, is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset.

Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The gross asset balances of the in-place value of tenant leases are included in "Buildings and Equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Acquired in-place tenant leases are amortized over periods that approximate the related lease terms. The above-market tenant leases and below-market ground leases are included in "Prepaid expenses and other assets, net", and below-market tenant leases are included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" as detailed in Notes 4 and 6, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of security deposits and cash escrowed under loan agreements for debt service, real estate taxes, property insurance, tenant improvements, capital renovations and capital improvements. 

Interest Rate Hedging Instruments

Interest Rate Hedging Instruments

The Company recognizes its derivative financial instruments in either "Prepaid expenses and other assets, net" or "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net", as applicable, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gain or loss) of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. To qualify as a hedging instrument, a derivative must pass prescribed effectiveness tests, performed quarterly using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The Company entered into two derivative agreements that qualify as hedging instruments and were designated, based upon the exposure being hedged, as cash flow hedges. The fair value of the cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2015 was $1.8 million and is included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the Company's interest rate hedge is classified as Level 2 in the fair value measurement table. To the extent they are effective, changes in fair value of cash flow hedges are reported in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" ("AOCI/L") and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is recognized in current earnings during the period of change in fair value. The gain or loss on the termination of an effective cash flow hedge is reported in AOCI/L and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The Company also assesses the credit risk that the counterparty will not perform according to the terms of the contract.

Revenue Recognition and Related Matters

Revenue Recognition and Related Matters

Minimum rent revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Minimum rent revenues also include amounts collected from tenants to allow the termination of their leases prior to their scheduled expiration dates as well as the amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases on acquired properties and tenant inducements. Minimum rent revenues also include percentage rents in lieu of minimum rent from those leases where the Company receives a percentage of tenant revenues.

The following is a summary of amortization of straight-line rent, lease termination income, net amortization related to above and below-market tenant leases, amortization of tenant inducements, and percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent amortization	$	422		$	97		$	744		$	1,184
Lease termination income	187			901			825			1,356
Net amortization of above and below-market tenant leases	(1,252		)	(2,433		)	(5,434		)	(9,829		)
Amortization of tenant inducements	(89		)	(11		)	(107		)	(21		)
Percentage rent in lieu of minimum rent	1,844			1,691			4,842			4,659

Straight-line rent receivables represent the current net cumulative rents recognized prior to when billed and collectible, as provided by the terms of the leases. The following is a summary of straight-line rent receivables, which are included in "Accounts receivable, net," in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reduced for allowances for doubtful accounts:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net	$	14,384	$	14,431

The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts against the portion of accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, which is estimated to be uncollectible. Such allowances are reviewed periodically based upon our recovery experience. The Company also evaluates the probability of collecting future rent which is recognized currently under a straight-line methodology. This analysis considers the long term nature of the Company's leases, as a certain portion of the straight-line rent currently recognizable will not be billed to the tenant until future periods. The Company's experience relative to unbilled straight-line rent receivable is that a certain portion of the amounts recorded as straight-line rental revenue are never collected from (or billed to) tenants due to early lease terminations. For the portion of the recognized deferred rent that is not deemed to be probable of collection, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided. Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.2 million and $3.4 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Tenant recoveries are amounts due from tenants that are established in the leases or computed based upon a formula related to real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses and are generally recognized as revenues in the period in which the related costs are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not expect the actual results to materially differ from the estimated reimbursement.

Overage rent is paid by a tenant when its sales exceed an agreed-upon minimum amount. Overage rent is calculated by multiplying the sales in excess of the minimum amount by a percentage defined in the lease. Overage rent is recognized on an accrual basis once tenant sales exceed contractual tenant lease thresholds.

Other revenues generally consist of amounts earned by the Company for vending, advertising, and marketing revenues earned at the Company's malls and is recognized on an accrual basis over the related service period.

Loss Per Share

er Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share

Fair Value

Fair Value

The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value:

• Level 1 — quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities;

• Level 2 — observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and

• Level 3 — unobservable inputs that are used when little or no market data is available.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as a consideration of counterparty credit risk in our assessment of fair value.  Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.  Accordingly, the Company's fair value estimates, which are made at the end of each reporting period, may be different than the amounts that may ultimately be realized upon the sale or disposition of these assets.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's financial and non-financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis by the above categories:

	Total Fair Value Measurement			Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps	$	(1,808	)	$	—	$	(1,808	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
December 31, 2014
Recurring basis:
Assets:
Interest rate cap	$	1		$	—	$	1		$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap	$	(482	)	$	—	$	(482	)	$	—
Non-recurring basis:
Investment in Real Estate (1)	$	74,237		$	—	$	—		$	74,237

Explanatory Note:

⁽¹⁾ The carrying value includes each mall's respective land, building, and in-place lease value.

The following is a reconciliation of the carrying value of properties that were impaired and disposed of during the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

	Collin Creek Mall (1)(2)			Steeplegate Mall (1)(2)
	(In thousands)
Beginning carrying value, January 1, 2015	$	51,767		$	22,659
Capital expenditures	—			—
Depreciation and amortization expense	(539		)	(219		)
Loss on impairment of real estate	(2,900		)	—
Disposition of real estate asset	(48,328		)	(22,440		)
Ending carrying value, September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ The carrying value includes the mall's respective land, building, in place lease value, and above and below market lease value.

⁽²⁾ The property was conveyed to its mortgage lender during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

The Company estimates fair value relating to impairment assessments utilizing a direct capitalization rate on forecasted net operating income or discounted cash flows that include all projected cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. Such projected cash flows are comprised of contractual rental revenues and forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these models are based on a reasonable range of current market rates for each property analyzed. The determination of which method to use is based on expected market conditions specific to the property being assessed. Based upon these inputs, the Company determined that its valuation of a property using a discounted cash flow model was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company uses interest rate swaps and caps to mitigate the effect of interest rate movements on its variable-rate debt. The Company has one interest rate cap and two interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2015 and the interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting. The interest rate swaps have met the effectiveness test criteria since inception and changes in their fair value are reported in "Other comprehensive income/(loss)" ("OCI/L") and are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects earnings. The interest rate cap did not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in its fair value are reported in earnings during the period incurred. The fair value of the Company's interest rate hedges, classified under Level 2, are determined based on prevailing market data for contracts with matching durations, current and anticipated LIBOR information, consideration of the Company's credit standing, credit risk of the counterparty, and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions. See Note 7 for additional information regarding the Company's interest rate hedging instruments.

The Company's financial instruments are short term in nature and as such their fair values approximate their carrying amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets except for debt. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, management’s estimates of fair value are presented below. The Company estimated the fair value of the debt by using a future discounted cash flow analysis based on the use and weighting of multiple market inputs. As a result of the frequency and availability of market data, the inputs used to measure the estimated fair value of debt are Level 3 inputs. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. 

Deferred Expenses

Deferred Expenses

Asset Retirement Obligations

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company evaluates any potential asset retirement obligations, including those related to disposal of asbestos containing materials and environmental remediation liabilities. The Company recognizes the fair value of such obligations in the period incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be determined.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. For example, estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to fair values of assets and liabilities for purposes of applying the acquisition method of accounting, the useful lives of assets, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables, impairment of long-lived assets, valuation of hedging instruments and fair value of debt. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This topic provides for five principles which should be followed to determine the appropriate amount and timing of revenue recognition for the transfer of goods and services to customers. The principles in this ASU should be applied to all contracts with customers regardless of industry, but specifically exclude leases. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with two transition methods of adoption allowed. Early adoption for reporting periods prior to December 15, 2016 is not permitted. On April 1, 2015, the FASB board voted to postpone the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year.  The ASU is now effective for the reporting periods after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the financial statement impact of the guidance in this ASU and determining which transition method it will utilize.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." This topic provides guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and requires related footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance in this ASU.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,” which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. For public business entities, this ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance in this ASU.

XML

NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]

NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

The non-controlling interest on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets represents Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock ("Preferred Shares") of Rouse Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), a subsidiary of Rouse, and the interest in the Mall at Barnes Crossing entities.

Holdings issued 111 Preferred Shares at a par value of $1,000 per share to third parties on June 29, 2012. The Preferred Shareholders are entitled to a cumulative preferential annual cash dividend of 12.5%. These Preferred Shares may only be redeemed at the option of Holdings for $1,000 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. Furthermore, in the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation of Holdings, the Preferred Shareholders are entitled to a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. The Preferred Shares are not convertible into or exchangeable for any property or securities of Holdings.

On August 29, 2014, the Company purchased a 51% interest in three limited liability companies which together own and operate the Mall at Barnes Crossing, the Market Center, a strip shopping center located adjacent to the property, and various vacant land parcels associated with the development (collectively referred to as "The Mall at Barnes Crossing"). The Company determined it holds the controlling interest in the The Mall at Barnes Crossing. As a result, the joint venture is presented on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the three months ended September 30, 2014 on a consolidated basis, with the interests of the third parties reflected as a non-controlling interest.

In connection with the acquisition, the Company formed a joint venture with the other interest holders in the properties. Pursuant to the joint venture arrangements, the Company has the exclusive authority to manage the business of the joint venture, except for certain actions (e.g., disposing of the properties and incurring debt under certain circumstances) that would require the consent of a third-party partner.  At any time after August 29, 2017 (or earlier under certain circumstances), the Company will have the right to purchase its partners’ interests in the joint venture at a purchase price generally equal to their fair market value (the “Call Price”). Consideration paid to the Company's partners for their interests in the joint venture may, under certain circumstances, be in the form of shares of the Company's common stock and/or common units (“Units”) of the Company's operating partnership, Rouse Properties, LP (the “Operating Partnership”).  If the consideration for the Call Price includes Units, the Company, the Operating Partnership and a third-party partner will enter into a tax protection agreement that will provide for indemnification of such partner under certain circumstances against certain tax liabilities incurred by such partner, if such liabilities result from a transaction involving a taxable disposition of The Mall at Barnes Crossing or the failure to offer to such partner the opportunity to guarantee certain indebtedness.

XML

DISPOSITIONS OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups [Abstract]

DISPOSITIONS OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS

DISPOSITIONS OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS

In 2014, the Company adopted ASU 2014-08, which changed the definition and criteria of property dispositions classified as discontinued operations, on a prospective basis. Under terms of the new guidance, the dispositions described below were not considered to be discontinued operations.

The results of operations of the properties below, as well as any gain on extinguishment of debt and impairment losses related to the properties, are included in "Income from continuing operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for all periods presented, as applicable.

The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall

In January 2015, the Company sold The Shoppes at Knollwood Mall located in St. Louis Park, MN, for gross proceeds of $106.7 million. The mortgage debt of $35.1 million was defeased simultaneously with the sale of the property. The Company recognized a gain of $32.5 million as a result of the disposition, which is reflected in "Gain on sale of real estate assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

At closing, the Company entered into a development agreement with the buyer to complete the redevelopment of the property. The estimated $7.9 million of costs associated with the completion of the redevelopment project were escrowed. As of September 30, 2015, the redevelopment has been substantially completed. Any difference between escrowed funds and costs to complete will be reflected in "Gain on sale of real estate assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Steeplegate Mall

In March 2015, the Company conveyed Steeplegate Mall, located in Concord, NH, to its mortgage lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had a net outstanding balance of approximately $45.9 million. The Company recognized a $22.8 million gain related to the debt extinguishment, which is reflected in "Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Collin Creek Mall

In April 2015, the Company conveyed Collin Creek Mall, located in Plano, TX, to its mortgage lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had a net outstanding balance of approximately $57.6 million. The Company recognized a $4.1 million gain related to the debt extinguishment, which is reflected in "Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

There were no dispositions during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

XML

INCOME TAXES (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Required minimum percentage distribution of ordinary taxable income to stockholders to qualify as a REIT		90.00%
Period of disqualification of REIT status		4 years
Amount incurred in taxes with the TRS subsidiary	$ 20		$ 50

XML

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES, NET

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Current [Abstract]

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES, NET

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES, NET

The following table summarizes the significant components of accounts payable and accrued expenses, net:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Below market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$	38,831	$	43,292
Construction payable	23,201		16,272
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	11,672		9,901
Accrued real estate taxes	11,374		9,028
Accrued dividend	10,512		9,885
Accrued interest	6,586		4,380
Accrued payroll and other employee liabilities	6,447		9,352
Deferred income	4,989		5,471
Asset retirement obligation liability	4,532		4,545
Tenants and other deposits	1,649		1,336
Other	3,862		514
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$	123,655	$	113,976

XML

DERIVATIVES DERIVATIVES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

DERIVATIVES

DERIVATIVES

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company records its derivative instruments in its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the derivative has been designated as a hedge and if so, whether the hedge has met the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting.

The Company's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from the counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up-front premium.

The effective portion of changes in fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI/L") and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period in which the hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate borrowings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized in earnings. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded no hedge ineffectiveness for the interest rate swap.

Amounts reported in AOCI/L related to derivatives are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. As of September 30, 2015, the Company expects that an additional $1.3 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense over the next 12 months.

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows on borrowings related to the West Valley Mall in January 2014 through June 2018. The interest related to this loan was computed at a variable rate of LIBOR + 1.75% and the Company swapped this for a fixed rate of 1.49% plus a spread of 1.75%.

In September 2015, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the risk of changes in cash flows on borrowings related to the NewPark Mall through September 2018. The interest related to this loan was computed at a variable rate of LIBOR + 2.10% with a forward starting swap, effective on January 1, 2016 with a fixed interest rate of 1.16% plus a spread of 2.10%.

The interest rate swaps protect the Company from increases in the hedged cash flows attributable to increases in LIBOR.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative	Number of Instruments	Notional Amount
		(in thousands)
Interest rate swaps	2	$173,250

Non-Designated Hedges - Interest Rate Cap

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges are recorded directly in earnings. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, such amounts equaled $0.01 million and $0.01 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding derivative that was not designated as a hedge in qualifying hedging relationships:

Interest Rate Derivative	Number of Instruments	Notional Amount
		(in thousands)
Interest rate cap	1	$66,500

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Instrument Type	Location in consolidated balance sheets	Notional Amount		Designated Benchmark Interest Rate	Strike Rate		Fair Value at September 30, 2015			Fair Value at December 31, 2014			Maturity Date
Derivative not designated as hedging instruments		(dollars in thousands)
Interest Rate Cap	Prepaid expenses and other assets, net	$	66,500	One-month LIBOR	4.50	%	$	—		$	1		May 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	Accounts payable and accrued expenses, net	$	173,250	One-month LIBOR	Various		$	(1,808	)	$	(482	)	Various

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

							Location of Losses Reclassified from OCI/L Into Earnings (Effective Portion)					Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)
Hedging Instrument	Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI/L (Effective Portion)							Loss Recognized in Earnings (Effective Portion)					Gain Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)
	2015			2014				2015		2014			2015		2014
	(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	$	(1,288	)	$	224		Interest expense	$	196	$	200	n.a.	$	—	$	—
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Pay fixed / receive variable rate swaps	$	(1,913	)	$	(756	)	Interest expense	$	587	$	526	n.a.	$	—	$	—

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The borrower (a special purpose entity) has an agreement with its derivative counterparty that contains a provision whereby, if the borrower defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default whereby repayment of such indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, the borrower could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The borrower has not posted any collateral related to this agreement. As of September 30, 2015, the fair value of the derivative liability, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to this agreement was $1.9 million. If the borrower had breached this provision as of September 30, 2015, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreement at its termination value of $1.9 million.

XML

INCOME TAXES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") beginning with the filing of its tax return for the 2011 fiscal year. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has met the requirements of a REIT and has filed its tax returns for the 2014 calendar year accordingly. Subject to its ability to continue to meet the requirements of a REIT, the Company intends to maintain this status in future periods.

To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including requirements to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income and to either distribute capital gains to stockholders, or pay corporate income tax on the undistributed capital gains. In addition, the Company is required to meet certain asset and income tests.

As a REIT, the Company will generally not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income that it distributes currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income taxes at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for tax treatment as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income or property, and to U.S federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income.

The Company has a subsidiary that it elected to treat as a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"), which is subject to federal and state income taxes. For each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $0.02 million in taxes associated with the TRS, which are recorded in "Provision for income taxes" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). For each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $0.05 million in taxes associated with the TRS which are recorded in "Provision for income taxes" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

XML

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS STOCK OPTIONS OUTSTANDING (Details 3) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Additional disclosures
Recognition of share-based compensation expense	$ 0.5	$ 1.5	$ 1.3
Assumptions used in estimating values of options granted
Unrecognized compensation cost (in dollars)	6.8	6.8
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2015	0.7	0.7
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2016	2.6	2.6
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2017	1.7	1.7
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2018	1.1	1.1
Compensation expense expected to be recognized in 2019	0.6	0.6
Compensation Nonvested Awards Total Compensatin expense expectedto be recognized in 2020	$ 0.1	$ 0.1
Restricted Stock [Member]
Shares
Nonvested restricted stock grants outstanding as of beginning of period (in shares)		205,731	278,617
Granted (in shares)		53,550	42,489
Forfeited (in shares)		(58,242)	0
Vested (in shares)		(120,843)	(108,097)
Nonvested restricted stock grants outstanding as of end of period (in shares)	80,196	80,196	213,009
Weighted average grant date fair value
Nonvested restricted stock grants outstanding as of beginning of period (in dollars per share)		$ 15.45	$ 14.85
Granted (in dollars per share)		17.18	18.40
Forfeited (in dollars per share)		15.41	0.00
Vested (in dollars per share)		15.33	15.05
Nonvested restricted stock grants outstanding as of end of period (in dollars per share)	$ 16.82	$ 16.82	$ 15.45
Additional disclosures
Weighted average remaining contractual term			1 year 15 days
Restricted Stock [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Stock Based Compensation Plans
Vesting period		3 years
Restricted Stock [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Stock Based Compensation Plans
Vesting period		4 years
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Stock Based Compensation Plans
Vesting period		5 years

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders, Basic			$ 42,318	$ (38,971)
Net income (loss)	$ (1,302)	$ (26,566)	42,418	(39,165)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	110	(194)	100	(194)
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest	(1,412)	(26,372)	42,318	(38,971)
Earnings Allocable to Common Shares [Abstract]
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders, Diluted	$ (1,302)	$ (26,566)	$ 42,425	$ (39,165)
Weighted average shares - basic	57,930,453	57,519,412	57,756,035	57,062,578
Incremental Common Shares Attributable to Dilutive Effect of Share-based Payment Arrangements	0	0	365,314	0
Weighted average shares - diluted	57,930,453	57,519,412	58,121,349	57,062,578
Earnings Per Share, Basic	$ (0.02)	$ (0.46)	$ 0.73	$ (0.69)
Earnings Per Share, Diluted	$ (0.02)	$ (0.46)	$ 0.73	$ (0.69)
Earnings Allocable to Participating Security Holders [Abstract]
Earnings (Loss) Allocated To Participating Securities Basic	$ 0	$ 0	$ 267	$ 0
Weighted average shares - basic	57,930,453	57,519,412	57,756,035	57,062,578
Incremental Common Shares Attributable to Dilutive Effect of Share-based Payment Arrangements	0	0	365,314	0
Weighted average shares - diluted	57,930,453	57,519,412	58,121,349	57,062,578
Earnings Per Share, Basic, Undistributed	$ 0.00	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Earnings Per Share, Diluted, Undistributed	$ 0.00	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

STOCK OPTIONS OUTSTANDING (Details 2) - Employee Stock Option [Member] - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015		Jan. 01, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Jan. 01, 2014
Stock options outstanding
Shares	3,502,581	[1]	3,313,869	3,313,869	2,579,171
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	7 years 9 months 22 days
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 16.40		$ 15.89	$ 15.90	$ 15.14
Stock options becoming fully vested and exercisable (in shares)	1,138,165
Intrinsic value of options vested	$ 0.2
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 15.41
Weighted average contractual term	6 years 11 months 13 days
March 2012 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	1,108,860
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	6 years 6 months
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 14.72
August 2012 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	36,400
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	6 years 11 months 1 day
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 13.75
October 2012 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	276,623
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	7 years 1 month
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 14.47
February 2013 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	538,600.0
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	7 years 5 months 1 day
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 16.48
February 2014 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	596,400
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	8 years 5 months
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 18.40
July 2014 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	28,198
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	8 years 10 months
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 17.20
February 2015 [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	717,500
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	9 years 5 months
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 17.18
Award Issuance Period March 2015 [Member] [Domain] [Member]
Stock options outstanding
Shares	200,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 19.76
Award Issuance Period March 2015 [Member] [Domain]
Stock options outstanding
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	9 years 6 months

[1] (1) As of September 30, 2015, 1,138,165 stock options are fully vested and are currently exercisable. As of September 30, 2015, the intrinsic value of these options was $0.2 million, and such stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $15.41 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.0 years.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIGANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Impairment)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Impaired Assets to be Disposed of by Method Other than Sale [Line Items]
Impairment of Real Estate	$ 0	$ 10,665	$ 2,900	$ 10,665
Provision for impairment	$ 0		$ 2,900	10,665
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Impaired Assets to be Disposed of by Method Other than Sale [Line Items]
Provision for impairment		3,100		3,100
Steeplegate Mall [Member]
Impaired Assets to be Disposed of by Method Other than Sale [Line Items]
Provision for impairment		$ 7,600		$ 7,600,000

XML

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE (Property Level Debt Narrative) (Details) $ in Thousands			1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
		Jun. 30, 2014	Jul. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) property	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) property	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Jun. 29, 2015 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Feb. 28, 2015	Jan. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)	Nov. 22, 2013 USD ($)
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate				21000.00%
Current borrowing capacity				$ 595,000	$ 595,000							$ 545,000	$ 510,000
Number of real estate properties | property				18	18
Long-term Debt				$ 1,637,430	$ 1,637,430							$ 1,584,499
Principal payments on mortgages, notes and loans payable					(181,719)	$ (97,319)
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Environmental Contingencies				900	900
Property Level Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt				1,280,000	1,280,000
Market rate adjustments				$ 0	$ 0
Weighted average interest rate				4.70%	4.70%
NewPark Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		4.05%	3.25%	21000.00%
Long-term Debt	[1]			$ 114,250	$ 114,250		$ 64,665
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate				326.00%	326.00%
Knollwood Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt											$ 40,000
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Environmental Contingencies				$ 100	$ 100
Washington Park Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate				0.00%	0.00%					5.35%
Steeplegate Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt									$ 45,900
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate				0.00%	0.00%
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term Debt								$ 57,600
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate				0.00%	0.00%
Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | NewPark Mall [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long Term Debt, Length of Extension					1 year
Long-term Debt				$ 135,000	$ 135,000
Weighted Average [Member] | Property Level Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Term					4 years 11 months

[1] (1) Net proceeds are net of closing costs.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Office Lease with Brookfield

Upon its spin-off from GGP, the Company assumed a 10-year lease agreement with Brookfield, as landlord, for office space for its corporate office in New York City. Costs associated with the office lease were $0.3 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $0.8 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. There were no costs outstanding and payable to Brookfield as of September 30, 2015.

Business Information and Technology Costs

As part of the spin-off from GGP, the Company commenced the development of its initial information technology platform ("Brookfield Platform"). The development of the Brookfield Platform required the Company to purchase, design and create various information technology applications and infrastructure. Brookfield Corporate Operations, LLC ("BCO") had been engaged to assist in the project development and to procure the various applications and infrastructure of the Company. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $8.3 million of infrastructure costs which were capitalized in "Buildings and equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had accelerated and written off any remaining infrastructure costs related to the Brookfield Platform.

The Company was also required to pay a monthly information technology services fee to BCO. Approximately $0.1 million and $0.8 million in costs were incurred for the three months ended September 30,2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.0 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to the BCO information technology services fee. As of September 30, 2015, there were $0.4 million of costs outstanding and payable associated with this fee.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company completed the development of its own information technology platform ("Rouse Platform") and had incurred approximately $9.0 millionof infrastructure costs. As ofSeptember 30, 2015,$7.1 millionwas included in "Buildings and equipment" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the purchase, design and implementation of various technology applications and infrastructure costs for the Rouse Platform. The remaining$1.9 millionwas included in "Other" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to the planning, scoping and data governance associated with developing the Rouse Platform.

Financial Service Center

During 2013, the Company engaged BCO's financial service center to manage certain administrative services of Rouse, such as accounts payable and receivable, lease administration, and other similar types of services. As of September 30, 2015, the Company no longer engages BCO's financial service center to manage such administrative services. Approximately $0.5 million in costs were incurred for the three months ended September 30,2014 and $0.1 million and $1.4 million in costs were incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, there were no costs outstanding and payable related to these services.

Demand Deposit from Brookfield U.S. Holdings

In August 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with Brookfield U.S. Holdings ("U.S. Holdings") to place funds into an interest bearing account which earns interest at LIBOR plus 1.05% per annum. The demand deposit was secured by a note from U.S. Holdings and was guaranteed by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. The demand deposit had an original maturity of February 14, 2013 and was extended to November 14, 2014. However, the Company may have demanded the funds earlier by providing U.S. Holdings with three days notice. The Company earned approximately $0.03 million and $0.3 million in interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the agreement was terminated.

XML

PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Prepaid Expense and Other Assets [Abstract]

Summary of the significant components of prepaid expenses and other assets, net

The following table summarizes the significant components of prepaid expenses and other assets, net:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Above-market tenant leases, net (Note 2)	$	41,849	$	50,996
Prepaid expenses	6,370		4,755
Below-market ground leases, net (Note 2)	3,029		3,145
Deposits	528		1,447
Other	369		2,347
Total prepaid expenses and other assets, net	$	52,145	$	62,690

XML

(Mortgages, Notes and Loans Payable Schedule) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands					1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
		Oct. 08, 2015	Sep. 12, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014	Jul. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Oct. 07, 2015	Jun. 29, 2015	May. 04, 2015	Apr. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2015	Feb. 28, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Oct. 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	May. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2014	Nov. 22, 2013
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Long-term Debt, Maturities, Repayment Terms						3.5
Fixed-rate debt						$ 1,170,162	$ 1,170,162							$ 1,248,426
Market rate adjustments						18	18							769
Fixed-rate debt at fair value						1,170,180	1,170,180							1,249,195
Variable-rate debt						467,250	467,250							335,304
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable						$ 1,637,430	1,637,430							1,584,499
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate						21000.00%
Current borrowing capacity						$ 595,000	595,000							545,000					$ 510,000
West Valley [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate																		3.24%
Steeplegate Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 0	$ 0							45,858
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable												$ 45,900
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						0.00%	0.00%
Bel Air Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[1]					$ 109,618	$ 109,618							111,276
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable										$ 112,505							$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[1]					5.30%	5.30%
GreenvilleMall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 39,995	$ 39,995							40,602
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						5.29%	5.29%
Vista Ridge Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 66,361	$ 66,361							68,537
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						6.87%	6.87%
Washington Park Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 0	$ 0							10,505
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						0.00%	0.00%						5.35%
The Centre at Salisbury [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 115,000	$ 115,000							115,000
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						5.79%	5.79%
The Mall at Turtle Creek [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 76,883	$ 76,883							77,648
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						6.54%	6.54%
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 0	$ 0							58,128
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable											$ 57,600
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						0.00%	0.00%
Grand Traverse Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 0	$ 0							59,479
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						0.00%	0.00%
West Valley Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[2]					$ 59,000	$ 59,000							59,000
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[2]					3.24%	3.24%
Pierre Bossier Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 46,071	$ 46,071							46,654
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						4.94%	4.94%
Pierre Bossier Anchor [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 3,573	$ 3,573							3,637
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						4.85%	4.85%
Southland Center [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 75,123	$ 75,123							76,037
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						5.09%	5.09%
ChesterfieldTowneCenter [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 106,820	$ 106,820							107,967
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						4.75%	4.75%
Animas Valley Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 49,386	$ 49,386							50,053
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						4.41%	4.41%
LakelandMall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 67,131	$ 67,131							68,053
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						4.17%	4.17%
Valley Hills [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt						$ 65,651	$ 65,651							66,492
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						4.47%	4.47%
Chula Vista Center [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[1],[3]					$ 70,000	$ 70,000							70,000
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable	[4]				$ 0									70,000
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[1],[3]					4.18%	4.18%
The Mall at Barnes Crossing [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[1]					$ 67,000	$ 67,000							67,000
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable	[5]													67,000		$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[1]					4.29%	4.29%
Bay Shore Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[1]					$ 46,500	$ 46,500							46,500
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable	[5]													46,500	$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[1]					3.96%	3.96%
Mt. Shasta Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[1]					$ 31,850	$ 31,850							0
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable	[6]					$ 31,850	$ 31,850						$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[1]					4.19%	4.19%
Fig Garden Village [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Fixed-rate debt	[1]					$ 74,200	$ 74,200							0
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable	[6]					$ 74,200	$ 74,200		$ 0
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate	[1]					4.14%	4.14%
NewPark Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Variable-rate debt	[7]					$ 114,250	$ 114,250							65,304
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable	[6]					$ 114,250	$ 114,250		$ 64,665
Long-term Debt, Percentage Bearing Fixed Interest, Percentage Rate						326.00%	326.00%
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate				4.05%	3.25%	21000.00%
Variable-rate debt, interest rate	[7]					2.44%	2.44%
2013 Term Loan [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Variable-rate debt	[8],[9]					$ 285,000	$ 285,000							260,000
Variable-rate debt, interest rate	[8],[9]					2.29%	2.29%
2013 Revolver [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Variable-rate debt	[8],[9]					$ 68,000	$ 68,000							10,000
Variable-rate debt, interest rate	[8],[9]					2.30%	2.30%
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member] | 2013 Term Loan [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate							2.35%
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member] | 2013 Revolver [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate							0.00%
Secured Debt [Member] | 2013 Term Loan [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Current borrowing capacity						$ 285,000	$ 285,000							260,000					260,000
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | 2013 Revolver [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Current borrowing capacity						310,000	310,000							$ 285,000					$ 250,000
Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | NewPark Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable						135,000	135,000
Additional subsequent funding						$ 20,800	$ 20,800
Loan term			3 years
Subsequent Event [Member] | Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | Bel Air Mall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable		$ 120,000
Additional subsequent funding		$ 9,500
Loan term		3 years
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		2.35%
Subsequent Event [Member] | Non Recourse Mortgage Loan [Member] | GreenvilleMall [Member]
Mortgages, notes and loans payable [Line Item]
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable		$ 45,500						$ 40,200

[1] See the significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions table below, under "—Property-Level Debt" in this Note 5 for additional information regarding the debt related to each property.

[2] During January 2014, the Company entered into a swap transaction which fixes the interest rate on the loan for this property at 3.24%, through June 2018. See Note 7 for further details.

[3] (4) On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center from the 2013 Senior Facility (as defined below) collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on Chula Vista Center. Sikes Senter debt was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing, and upon repayment, Sikes was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool balance.

[4] On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center, located in Chula Vista, CA, from the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on the property. Sikes Senter, located in Wichita Falls, TX, had an outstanding mortgage loan which was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing. Upon repayment, Sikes Senter was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility balance.

[5] The loan is interest-only for the first

[6] (1) Net proceeds are net of closing costs.

[7] {F|ahBzfndlYmZpbGluZ3MtaHJkcmoLEgZYTUxEb2MiXlhCUkxEb2NHZW5JbmZvOjBmZGMzODAyMjcxMDQ5ZTI4NTVlOGQzYzVjYjEyNGI5fFRleHRTZWxlY3Rpb246M0MyRjhDQTBBNTMyNjVDQzQ5Qzc0M0I5NkVGRUY2RUQM}

[8] (6) LIBOR (30 day) plus 210 basis points.

[9] June 30, 2015, the Company exercised a portion of its "accordion feature" on the 2013 Senior Facility, increasing the 2013 Term Loan (as defined below) from $260.0 million to $285.0 million and increasing the availability on the 2013 Revolver (as defined below) from $285.0 million to $310.0 million.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Fair Value)(Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		9 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fixed-rate debt		$ 1,170,162	$ 1,248,426
Variable-rate debt		467,250	335,304
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable		1,637,430	1,584,499
Estimated Fair Value
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fixed-rate debt		1,211,570	1,248,928
Variable-rate debt		468,400	336,791
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable		1,679,970	1,585,719
Carrying Amount
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fixed-rate debt		1,170,180	1,249,195
Variable-rate debt		467,250	335,304
Total Mortgages, notes and loans payable		1,637,430	$ 1,584,499
Collin Creek Mall [Member]
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Assets	[1]	$ (48,328)

[1] (2) The property was conveyed to its mortgage lender during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	Non-controlling Interest	Common Class B [Member] Common Stock [Member]	Common Class A [Member]	Common Class A [Member] Common Stock [Member]
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2013						0		49,648,436
Ending balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2014						0		57,742,605
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 455,281	$ 565,798	$ (111,125)	$ 0	$ 111			$ 497
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2014	555,155	688,129	(150,290)	(230)	16,968			$ 578
Increase (Decrease) in Shareholders' Equity
Net income (loss)	(38,971)		(39,165)		194
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent	(39,201)
Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instrument	(230)			(230)
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues								8,050,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, New Issues	150,697	150,616						$ 81
Offering costs	(467)	(467)
Dividends	(30,583)	(30,583)						$ 0
Issuance and amortization of stock compensation (in shares)								42,489
Issuance and amortization of stock compensation	(2,737)	(2,737)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercises in Period								1,680
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised	28	28
Noncontrolling Interest, Increase from Business Combination	16,663				16,663
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2014						0	57,748,141	57,743,981
Ending balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2015						0	58,084,620	58,022,217.000
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2014	533,335	679,275	(162,881)	(482)	16,845			$ 578
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2015	548,520	654,304	(120,463)	(1,809)	15,908			$ 580
Increase (Decrease) in Shareholders' Equity
Net income (loss)	42,318		$ 42,418		(100)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Portion Attributable to Parent	(1,327)			$ (1,327)
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent	40,991
Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instrument	(1,327)
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues								8,050,000
Dividends	(31,306)	(31,306)
Issuance and amortization of stock compensation (in shares)								53,550
Issuance and amortization of stock compensation	(2,220)	(2,220)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercises in Period								279,171
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Stock Options Exercised	4,117	$ 4,115						$ 2
Noncontrolling Interest, Decrease from Distributions to Noncontrolling Interest Holders	(931)				(931)
Proceeds from Noncontrolling Interests	49				49
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Restricted Stock Award, Forfeited								(58,242)
Noncontrolling Interest, Increase from Business Combination	$ 45				$ 45
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Employee Stock Purchase Plans	3,757

XML

ACQUISITIONS (Notes)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Acquisitions

ACQUISITIONS

The Company includes the results of operations of real estate assets acquired in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) from the date of the related transactions.

The following table presents the Company's acquisitions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Date Acquired	Property Name	Location	Square Footage Acquired	Purchase Price
2015 Acquisitions					(In thousands)
	01/28/2015	Mt. Shasta Mall (1)(2)	Redding, CA	521,000	$	49,000
	06/03/2015	Fig Garden Village (1)(3)	Fresno, CA	301,459	106,100
			2015 Acquisitions Total	822,459	$	155,100
2014 Acquisitions
	05/22/2014	Bel Air Mall (1)(4)	Mobile, AL	1,004,439	$	131,917
	08/29/2014	The Mall at Barnes Crossing (5)	Tupelo, MS	736,607	98,850
			2014 Acquisitions Total	1,741,046	$	230,767

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Rouse acquired a 100% interest in the mall.

⁽²⁾   The Company closed on a new $31.9 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.19%, matures in March 2025, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

⁽³⁾ The Company closed on a new $74.2 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.14%, matures in June 2025, is interest only for the first five years and amortizes over 30 years thereafter.

⁽⁴⁾ The Company assumed an existing $112.5 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 5.30%, matures in December 2015 and amortizes over 30 years.

⁽⁵⁾ Rouse acquired a 51% controlling interest in the mall and related properties. In conjunction with the closing of this transaction, the Company closed on a new $67.0 million non-recourse mortgage loan that bears interest at 4.29%, matures in September 2024, is interest only for the first three years and amortizes over a 30 years thereafter. See Note 12 for further details.

The following table presents certain additional information regarding the Company's acquisitions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Property Name	Land		Building and Improvements		Acquired Lease Intangibles		Acquired Above Market Lease Intangibles		Acquired Below Market Lease Intangibles			Other
2015 Acquisitions		(In thousands)
	Mt. Shasta Mall	$	7,809	$	38,008	$	3,779	$	915	$	(1,813	)	$	302
	Fig Garden Village	18,774		79,528		7,366		3,975		(2,907		)	(636		)
	Total	$	26,583	$	117,536	$	11,145	$	4,890	$	(4,720	)	$	(334	)
2014 Acquisitions
	Bel Air Mall	$	8,969	$	111,206	$	11,329	$	3,952	$	(6,889	)	$	3,350
	The Mall at Barnes Crossing	17,969		75,949		6,973		4,700		(8,100		)	1,359
	Total	$	26,938	$	187,155	$	18,302	$	8,652	$	(14,989	)	$	4,709

The Company incurred acquisition and transaction related costs of $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1.7 million and $0.9 million for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Acquisition and transaction related costs consist of due diligence costs such as legal fees, environmental studies and closing costs. These costs were recorded in "Other" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded approximately $4.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively, in revenues and $0.4 million in net income and $1.3 million in net loss related to the acquisitions of Fig Garden Village and Mt. Shasta Mall. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded approximately $5.2 million and $7.0 million, respectively, in revenues and $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in net loss related to the acquisitions of Bel Air Mall and The Mall at Barnes Crossing.

The following condensed pro forma financial information for each of the nine months ended September 30,2015 and 2014 includes pro forma adjustments related to the acquisitions of Mt. Shasta Mall, Fig Garden Village, Bel Air Mall and The Mall at Barnes Crossing, which is presented assuming the acquisitions had been consummated as of January 1, 2014. The following condensed pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been assuming the acquisitions had been consummated as of January 1, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. Pro forma adjustments include above and below-market amortization, straight-line rent, interest expense, and depreciation and amortization.

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2015		2014
	As Adjusted (Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total revenues	$	224,579	$	236,976
Net income (loss)	$	41,138	$	(41,351	)
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	0.71	$	(0.72	)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	0.71	$	(0.72	)
Weighted average shares - basic	57,756,035		57,062,578
Weighted average shares - diluted	58,121,349		57,062,578

XML

DERIVATIVES (Derivative FInancial Instruments Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) Classification) (Details) - Interest Expense [Member] - Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member] - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative [Line Items]
Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI/L (Effective Portion)	$ (1,288)		$ (1,913)
Derivative Instruments, Gain Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Effective Portion		$ 224		$ (756)
Loss Recognized in Earnings (Effective Portion)	196	200	587	526
Gain Recognized in Earnings (Ineffective Portion)	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

MORTGAGES, NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Summary of Mortgages, notes and loans payable

The following is a summary of significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions that have occurred during the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

Property	Date	Balance at Date of Refinancing		Interest Rate		Balance of New Loan		New Interest Rate		Net Proceeds (1)		Maturity
September 30, 2015:
NewPark Mall (2)(3)	September 2015	$	64,665	3.44	%	$	114,250	2.44	%	$	47,942	September 2018
Fig Garden Village (4)	June 2015	—		—	%	74,200		4.14	%	—		June 2025
Mt. Shasta Mall (3)	February 2015	—		—	%	31,850		4.19	%	—		March 2025
December 31, 2014:
Bayshore Mall (3)	October 2014	$	—	—	%	$	46,500	3.96	%	$	43,400	October 2024
The Mall at Barnes Crossing (3)	August 2014	—		—	%	67,000		4.29	%	—		September 2024
Chula Vista Center (5)	July 2014	—		—	%	70,000		4.18	%	15,000		July 2024
Sikes Senter (5)	July 2014	54,618		5.20	%	—		—	%	—		—
Bel Air Mall	May 2014	—		—	%	112,505		5.30	%	—		December 2015

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ Net proceeds are net of closing costs.

⁽²⁾ In September 2015, the loan associated with NewPark Mall was refinanced for $135.0 million, with an initial funding of $114.3 million. The loan provides for an additional funding of up to $20.8 million upon achieving certain conditions.  The loan has a term of three years with a one year extension option subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. A swap will be effective on this loan beginning January 1, 2016, which fixes the interest rate at 3.26%, through September 2018.

⁽³⁾ The loan is interest-only for the first three years.

⁽⁴⁾ The loan is interest-only for the first five years.

⁽⁵⁾ On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center, located in Chula Vista, CA, from the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on the property. Sikes Senter, located in Wichita Falls, TX, had an outstanding mortgage loan which was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing. Upon repayment, Sikes Senter was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility balance.

In January 2015, the loan associated with The Shoppes at Knollwood with a mortgage debt balance of $35.1 million was defeased simultaneously with the sale of the property. As of December 31, 2014, the loan was shown as a component of "Liabilities of property held for sale" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In February 2015, the Company repaid the $10.4 million mortgage debt balance on Washington Park Mall, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.35%.

In February 2015, the loan associated with Vista Ridge Mall was transferred to special servicing.

In March 2015, the property associated with Steeplegate Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $45.9 million.

In April 2015, the property associated with Collin Creek Mall was conveyed to its lender in full satisfaction of the debt. The loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $57.6 million.

On July 1, 2015, the Company repaid the $59.0 million mortgage debt balance on Grand Traverse Mall, which had a fixed interest rate of 5.02% On July 29, 2015, Grand Traverse Mall was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool.

Mortgages, notes and loans payable are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		Interest Rate at September 30, 2015		Scheduled Maturity Date
Fixed-rate debt:	(in thousands)
Steeplegate Mall	$	—	$	45,858	—	%	—
Bel Air Mall (1)	109,618		111,276		5.30		December 2015
Greenville Mall	39,995		40,602		5.29		December 2015
Vista Ridge Mall	66,361		68,537		6.87		April 2016
Washington Park Mall	—		10,505		—		—
The Centre at Salisbury(2)	115,000		115,000		5.79		May 2016
The Mall at Turtle Creek	76,883		77,648		6.54		June 2016
Collin Creek Mall	—		58,128		—		—
Grand Traverse Mall	—		59,479		—		—
West Valley Mall (3)	59,000		59,000		3.24		September 2018
Pierre BossierMall	46,071		46,654		4.94		May 2022
Pierre Bossier Anchor	3,573		3,637		4.85		May 2022
Southland Center (MI)	75,123		76,037		5.09		July 2022
Chesterfield Towne Center	106,820		107,967		4.75		October 2022
Animas Valley Mall	49,386		50,053		4.41		November 2022
Lakeland Square	67,131		68,053		4.17		April 2023
Valley Hills Mall	65,651		66,492		4.47		July 2023
Chula Vista Center (1)(4)	70,000		70,000		4.18		July 2024
The Mall at Barnes Crossing (1)	67,000		67,000		4.29		September 2024
Bayshore Mall (1)	46,500		46,500		3.96		October 2024
Mt. Shasta Mall (1)	31,850		—		4.19		March 2025
Fig Garden Village (1)	74,200		—		4.14		June 2025
Total fixed-rate debt	$	1,170,162	$	1,248,426
Add: Market rate adjustments	18		769
	$	1,170,180	$	1,249,195
Variable-rate debt:
NewPark Mall (1)(5)	$	114,250	$	65,304	2.44	%	September 2018
2013 Term Loan(6)(7)	285,000		260,000		2.29		November 2018
2013 Revolver (6)(7)	68,000		10,000		2.30		November 2017
Total variable-rate debt	$	467,250	$	335,304
Total mortgages, notes and loans payable, net	$	1,637,430	$	1,584,499

Explanatory Notes:

⁽¹⁾ See the significant property loan refinancings and acquisitions table below, under "—Property-Level Debt" in this Note 5 for additional information regarding the debt related to each property.

⁽²⁾ The Company guaranteed a maximum amount of $3.5 million until certain financial covenants are met for two consecutive years.

⁽³⁾ During January 2014, the Company entered into a swap transaction which fixes the interest rate on the loan for this property at 3.24%, through June 2018. See Note 7 for further details.

⁽⁴⁾ On July 1, 2014, the Company removed Chula Vista Center from the 2013 Senior Facility (as defined below) collateral pool and placed a new non-recourse mortgage loan on Chula Vista Center. Sikes Senter debt was repaid on July 1, 2014 from proceeds from the Chula Vista Center refinancing, and upon repayment, Sikes was added to the 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool with no change to the outstanding 2013 Senior Facility collateral pool balance.

⁽⁵⁾ LIBOR (90 day) plus 210 basis points. The Company entered into a fixed swap which fixes the interest rate at 3.26% beginning January 2016, through September 2018.

⁽⁶⁾ LIBOR (30 day) plus 210 basis points.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Loss Per Share)(Details) - shares	Sep. 30, 2015		Jan. 01, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Jan. 01, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Income (Loss) per share
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Number	3,502,581	[1]	3,313,869		3,313,869	2,579,171
Restricted Stock [Member]
Income (Loss) per share
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number	80,196			205,731	213,009		278,617

[1] (1) As of September 30, 2015, 1,138,165 stock options are fully vested and are currently exercisable. As of September 30, 2015, the intrinsic value of these options was $0.2 million, and such stock options had a weighted average exercise price of $15.41 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 7.0 years.

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Notes)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

EARNINGS PER SHARE

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated using the two class method, which allocates earnings among common stock and participating securities to calculate EPS when an entity's capital structure includes either two or more classes of common stock or common stock and participating securities. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities. As such, unvested restricted stock of the Company is considered a participating security. The dilutive effect of options and their equivalents (including fixed awards and nonvested stock issued under stock-based compensation plans), is computed using the “treasury” method.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) used in basic and diluted EPS calculations (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015		2014
Net income (loss)	$	(1,412	)	$	(26,372	)	$	42,318	$	(38,971	)
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests	110			(194		)	100		(194		)
Income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders and Participating Security Holders	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,418	$	(39,165	)
Earnings allocable to common shares:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders	$	(1,302	)	$	(26,566	)	$	42,425	$	(39,165	)
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	57,930,453			57,519,412			57,756,035		57,062,578
Add: effect of assumed shares issued under treasury stock method for stock options and restricted shares	—			—			365,314		—
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	57,930,453			57,519,412			58,121,349		57,062,578
Basic and Diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73	$	(0.69	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.73	$	(0.69	)
Earnings allocable to Participating Security Holders:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to Participating Security Holders	$	—		$	—		$	267	$	—
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	57,930,453			57,519,412			57,756,035		57,062,578
Add: effect of assumed shares issued under treasury stock method for stock options and restricted shares	—			—			365,314		—
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	57,930,453			57,519,412			58,121,349		57,062,578
Basic and Diluted earnings per share
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- basic	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net income (loss) attributable to Rouse Properties Inc. and allocable to common shareholders- diluted	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—