XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Processing, Transportation and Salt Water Disposal Commitments
Delaware Basin — Loving County, Texas Natural Gas Processing
In late 2015, the Company entered into a 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas gathering and processing agreement whereby the Company committed to deliver the anticipated natural gas production from a significant portion of its Loving County, Texas acreage in West Texas through the counterparty’s gathering system for processing at the counterparty’s facilities. Under this agreement, if the Company does not meet the volume commitment for transportation and processing at the facilities in a contract year, it will be required to pay a deficiency fee per MMBtu of natural gas deficiency. At the end of each year of the agreement, the Company can elect to have the previous year’s actual transportation and processing volumes be the new minimum commitment for each of the remaining years of the contract. As such, the Company has the ability to unilaterally reduce the gathering and processing commitment if the Company’s production in the Loving County area is less than the Company’s minimum commitment. If the Company ceased operations in this area at September 30, 2018, the total deficiency fee required to be paid would be approximately $12.5 million. In addition, if the Company elects to reduce the gathering and processing commitment in any year, the Company has the ability to elect to increase the committed volumes in any future year to the originally agreed gathering and processing commitment. Any quantity in excess of the volume commitment delivered in a contract year can be carried over to the next contract year for purposes of calculating that year’s natural gas deficiency. The Company paid approximately $4.8 million and $4.0 million in natural gas processing and gathering fees under this agreement during the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $12.2 million and $10.8 million in natural gas processing and gathering fees under this agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company can elect to either sell the residue gas to the counterparty at the tailgate of its processing plants or have the counterparty deliver to the Company the residue gas in-kind to be sold to third parties downstream of the plants.
Delaware Basin — Eddy County, New Mexico Natural Gas Transportation
In late 2017, the Company entered into an 18-year, fixed-fee natural gas transportation agreement whereby the Company committed to deliver a portion of the residue natural gas production at the tailgate of San Mateo’s Black River cryogenic natural gas processing plant in the Rustler Breaks asset area (the “Black River Processing Plant”) to transport through the counterparty’s pipeline. Under this agreement, if the Company does not meet the volume commitment for transportation in a contract year, the Company will owe the fees to transport the committed volume whether or not the committed volume is utilized. The minimum contractual obligation at September 30, 2018 was approximately $45.2 million. The Company paid approximately $1.0 million and $2.5 million in transportation fees under this agreement during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively.
In late 2017, the Company also entered into a fixed-fee NGL transportation and fractionation agreement whereby the Company committed to deliver its NGL production at the tailgate of the Black River Processing Plant. The Company is committed to deliver a minimum amount of NGLs to the counterparty upon construction and completion of a pipeline expansion and a fractionation facility by the counterparty, which is currently expected to be completed in late 2019. The Company has no rights to compel the counterparty to construct this pipeline extension or fractionation facility. If the counterparty does not construct the pipeline extension and fractionation facility, then the Company does not have any minimum volume commitments under the agreement. If the counterparty constructs the pipeline extension and fractionation facility on or prior to February 28, 2021, then the Company will have a commitment to deliver a minimum amount of NGLs for seven years following the completion of the pipeline extension and fractionation facility. If the Company does not meet its NGL volume commitment in any quarter during the seven-year commitment period, it will be required to pay a deficiency fee per gallon of NGL deficiency. Should the pipeline extension and fractionation facility be completed on or prior to February 28, 2021, the minimum contractual obligation during the seven-year period would be approximately $132.3 million.
In April 2018, the Company entered into a short-term natural gas transportation agreement whereby the Company committed to deliver a portion of the residue natural gas production at the tailgate of the Black River Processing Plant to transport through the counterparty’s pipeline. Under this short-term agreement, the Company will owe the fees to transport the committed volume whether or not the committed volume is transported through the counterparty’s pipeline. The minimum contractual obligation under this short-term contract at September 30, 2018 was approximately $3.6 million. This short-term agreement ends on September 30, 2019. The Company paid approximately $0.9 million and $1.1 million in transportation fees under this agreement during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively.
In April 2018, the Company also entered into a 16-year, fixed-fee natural gas transportation agreement that begins on October 1, 2019, whereby the Company committed to deliver a portion of the residue natural gas production at the tailgate of the Black River Processing Plant to transport through the counterparty’s pipeline. The Company will owe the fees to transport the committed volume whether or not the committed volume is transported through the counterparty’s pipeline. The minimum contractual obligation at September 30, 2018 was approximately $56.8 million.
In May 2018, the Company also entered into a 10-year, fixed-fee natural gas sales agreement whereby the Company committed to deliver residue natural gas through the counterparty’s pipeline to the Texas Gulf Coast beginning on the in-service date of such pipeline, which is expected to be operational in late 2019. If the Company does not meet the volume commitment specified in the natural gas sales agreement, it may be required to pay a deficiency fee per MMBtu of natural gas deficiency. The minimum contractual obligation at September 30, 2018 was approximately $200.6 million.
Delaware Basin — San Mateo
In February 2017, the Company dedicated its current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks and Wolf asset areas pursuant to 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas, oil and salt water gathering agreements and salt water disposal agreements with subsidiaries of San Mateo. In addition, the Company dedicated its current and future leasehold interests in the Rustler Breaks asset area pursuant to a 15-year, fixed-fee natural gas processing agreement (collectively with the gathering and salt water disposal agreements, the “Operational Agreements”). San Mateo provides the Company with firm service under each of the Operational Agreements in exchange for certain minimum volume commitments. The minimum contractual obligation under the Operational Agreements at September 30, 2018 was approximately $222.0 million.
Beginning in May 2017, a subsidiary of San Mateo entered into certain agreements with third parties for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of an expansion of the Black River Processing Plant. The expansion was completed late in the first quarter of 2018. Since inception, San Mateo’s commitments under these agreements totaled $55.3 million. The subsidiary of San Mateo paid approximately $2.0 million and $5.6 million under these agreements during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, there was no remaining obligation under these agreements.
During the first quarter of 2018, a subsidiary of San Mateo entered into agreements for additional field compression and an amine gas treatment unit to maximize the operation of the Black River Processing Plant. Since inception, San Mateo’s commitments under these agreements totaled $24.8 million. The subsidiary of San Mateo paid approximately $6.3 million and $12.8 million under these agreements during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, the remaining obligations under these agreements were $12.0 million, which are expected to be paid within the next year.
Other Commitments
The Company does not own or operate its own drilling rigs, but instead enters into contracts with third parties for such drilling rigs. These contracts establish daily rates for the drilling rigs and the term of the Company’s commitment for the drilling services to be provided. The Company would incur a termination obligation if the Company elected to terminate a contract and if the drilling contractor were unable to secure replacement work for the contracted drilling rigs at the same daily rates being charged to the Company prior to the end of their respective contract terms. The Company’s undiscounted minimum outstanding aggregate termination obligations under its drilling rig contracts were approximately $32.8 million at September 30, 2018.
At September 30, 2018, the Company had outstanding commitments to participate in the drilling and completion of various non-operated wells. If all of these wells are drilled and completed as proposed, the Company’s minimum outstanding aggregate commitments for its participation in these non-operated wells were approximately $44.2 million at September 30, 2018. The Company expects these costs to be incurred within the next year.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to several lawsuits encountered in the ordinary course of its business. While the ultimate outcome and impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, it is remote that these lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.