INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC.
Conflict Minerals Report
For the reporting period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014


Overview

	Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc. (the Company) is a global provider of
enterprise-grade collaboration, communications and
customer engagement software and cloud services.
The Companys primary offering is its Customer Interaction Center
(CIC) product suite,
a multichannel communications platform that can be deployed
on-premises or through the cloud
as Communications as a Service (CaaS). The Company is a
recognized leader in the
worldwide contact center market.

	This Conflict Minerals Report (the Report) of the Company has been prepared
pursuant to Rule 13p-1 (the Rule) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and Form SD for the reporting period January 1, 2014 to
December 31, 2014. The Rule requires disclosure of certain
information when a company
manufactures or contracts to manufacture products for which
the minerals specified in the Rule
are necessary to the functionality or production of
those products. The specified
minerals are gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite and wolframite,
including their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten
(collectively, the Conflict Minerals). The Covered Countries for the purposes
of the Rule and this Report are the Democratic Republic
of the Congo, the Republic
of the Congo, the Central African Republic, South Sudan,
Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi,
Tanzania, Zambia and Angola.

	This Report relates to products (i) for which Conflict Minerals are
necessary to the functionality or production of that product;
(ii) that were manufactured,
or contracted to be manufactured, by the Company; and (iii)
for which the manufacture was
completed during calendar year 2014. These products are
referred to in this Report collectively as the
Covered Products and include voice over IP (VoIP) telephones
and cards and computer servers.

Conflict Minerals Policy
    The Company has adopted a Conflict Minerals Policy,
pursuant to which the Company will, among other things:
* evaluate its suppliers and products in order to understand
which of its suppliers
and products may use Conflict Minerals;
* request that its suppliers support the Companys Conflict
Minerals compliance efforts;
* implement new terms and conditions for its suppliers which will incorporate
Conflict Minerals disclosure requirements;
* engage in an additional risk assessment, should the Company become aware of a
supplier whose supply chain includes metals from Covered Countries,
in an attempt to determine whether
such metals might reasonably be expected to include Conflict Minerals; and
* take appropriate actions in a timely manner, including
potential reassessment of
supplier relationships, should the results of the Companys
additional due diligence assessment
indicate likelihood that minerals in its supply chain are Conflict Minerals.

Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

	The Company has conducted a good faith reasonable country of origin inquiry
(RCOI) regarding the Covered Products, which was designed to
determine whether any
of the Conflict Minerals included in the Covered Products
originated in the Covered Countries
and whether any of the Conflict Minerals may be from recycled or scrap sources.

	The Companys RCOI to determine the country of origin of necessary
Conflict Minerals
included identifying the Companys direct suppliers who may contribute
necessary Conflict
Minerals for the Covered Products and conducting a supply-chain survey
with the identified direct
suppliers using the EICC/GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template.
The Company surveyed four of
its direct suppliers, which are the only direct suppliers from whom
it purchases and customizes
products or from whom specific product parts are purchased and built
into the Companys products.
The Company as a purchaser is many steps removed from the mining of
Conflict Minerals, does not
directly purchase raw ore or unrefined Conflict Minerals and does
no direct purchasing in the
Covered Countries.  As a result, it must rely on its suppliers listed
below to provide information
regarding the origin of Conflict Minerals that are included
in the Covered Products.

Due Diligence Process

	The Company exercised due diligence regarding the source and
chain of custody of its
Conflict Minerals through utilization of the nationally recognized
due diligence framework in
the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence
Guidance for Responsible
Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High Risk
Areas: Second Edition, including the
related supplements on gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten (the OECD
Guidance).  The Companys due
diligence process included:

* Publishing its Conflict Minerals Policy on the Companys external
website at:
http://investors.inin.com/corporate-governance.cfm, which outlines
the Companys
commitment to a supply chain which is free from conflict minerals.

* Working with a cross-functional team of the Companys employees
from the financial
reporting, logistics and legal departments to identify all components
of the Companys
products which may contain Conflict Minerals and to compile a list of
the suppliers from
whom the Company purchases those items.
* Conducting a supply-chain survey with the Companys four direct suppliers
identified below using the EICC/GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template.
The Company
determined that these four suppliers are the only suppliers from whom
the Company purchases
and customizes products or from whom specific product parts are purchased
and built into its products.

* Reviewing the supply chain surveys received from these four direct suppliers.

	The table below outlines the products which have exposure, the suppliers
from whom those products are purchased and the results of the RCOI and
due diligence for each product,
including information received from each supplier.






Supplier
Product Type
  ININ Product Name
  Country of Origin
DRC Conflict
Determination
AudioCodes
Voice over
IP (VoIP) Telephone
SIP Stations
Uncertain or Unknown
Undeterminable
Arrow
Electronics
Computer Servers
Interaction
Edge Gateway
Uncertain or Unknown
Undeterminable
Hewlett Packard Company

Computer Servers
HP DL360 G7 and GEN
8
Uncertain or Unknown
Undeterminable


HP DL380 G7 and GEN 8
Uncertain or
Unknown
Undeterminable


HP DL120
G7
Uncertain or Unknown
Undeterminable
Sangoma Technologies
Voice over IP
(VoIP)  Card
Interaction Edge
Gateway
Uncertain or Unknown
Undeterminable

	The Company received responses from all four suppliers that
were queried. The Company
sought to determine the mines or locations of origin of the Conflict
Minerals in the Covered
Products with the greatest specificity possible through its due diligence
process described
above and based on the information obtained from those suppliers pursuant
to such inquiry.
Certain of these suppliers provided their responses to the Companys
inquiries at an enterprise-wide
level, rather than at a level specific to the materials and components they
supplied to the Company.
The Company was unable to determine which, if any, of the smelters and
countries of origin listed in
these responses were the actual source of the Conflict Minerals that were
supplied to the Company.
As a result, the Company did not receive sufficient information to determine
the country of origin
of the Conflict Minerals in the Covered Products or the facilities used to
process such Conflict Minerals.
After exercising the due diligence described above, the Company was unable
to determine whether or not
each of the Covered Products qualify as DRC conflict free,
as defined under the Rule.

	The Company plans to take the following steps, among others, in 2015
to expand further
its due diligence measures and to mitigate the risk that the necessary Conflict
Minerals contained
in the Companys products finance or benefit
armed groups in the Covered Countries:
* Continue to engage with suppliers to obtain current, accurate and complete
information about the supply chain;
* Include a Conflict Minerals clause in new or renewed supplier contracts;
* Continue to train the Companys internal research and compliance team on
the latest SEC developments
regarding Conflict Minerals;
* Contact smelters identified as a result of the RCOI and due diligence process
as being the source of
the Conflict Minerals supplied to the Company and request
their participation in
obtaining a conflict free
designation from an industry program such as the EICC/GeSI
Conflict Free Smelter
program; and
* Compare RCOI and due diligence results to information
collected via independent
conflict free
smelter validation programs such as the EICC/GeSI Conflict Free Smelter program.
    This Conflict Minerals Report contains forward-looking
statements, including
but not limited to
statements relating to actions that the Company may
take in the future with respect
to supplier engagement
and RCOI and due diligence efforts.  Such statements are based on the current
expectations of the Companys
management and are neither promises nor guarantees of future performance of the
actions.  The forward-looking
statements represent managements expectations as of the date of this Report.
Subsequent events and
developments may cause managements view to change.  While the Company may
elect to update these
forward-looking statements at some point in the future,
the Company specifically
disclaims any obligation
to do so.  These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as
representing the Companys
views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Report.




Exhibit 1.01