EX-99.1 2 d408365dex991.htm SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 - KEYBANC SLIDES September 11, 2012 - KeyBanc Slides
KeyBanc
2012 Basic Materials
& Packaging Conference
September 11, 2012
Exhibit 99.1


Safe Harbor Statement
Safe Harbor Statement
Some of the information included in this presentation contains “forward-looking statements”
(as defined in Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Such forward-looking
statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available. Forward-looking
statements include the information concerning SunCoke’s possible or assumed future results of operations, the planned Master
Limited Partnership, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, potential growth opportunities, potential operating
performance improvements, the effects of competition and the effects of future legislation or regulations. Forward-looking
statements include all statements that are not historical facts and may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such
as the words “believe,”
“expect,”
“plan,”
“intend,”
“anticipate,”
“estimate,”
“predict,”
“potential,”
“continue,”
“may,”
“will,”
“should”
or the negative of these terms or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. You should not put
undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, SunCoke has included in its
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission cautionary language identifying important factors (but not necessarily all the
important factors) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made
by SunCoke. For more information concerning these factors, see SunCoke's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
All
forward-looking statements included in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by such cautionary statements.
SunCoke does not have any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement (or its associated cautionary
language) whether as a result of new information or future events or after the date of this presentation, except as required by
applicable law.
This presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures intended to supplement, not substitute for, comparable GAAP
measures. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures are provided in the Appendix at the end of
the presentation. Investors are urged to consider carefully the comparable GAAP measures and the reconciliations to those
measures provided in the Appendix, or on our website at www.suncoke.com.
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
2


Largest independent producer of
metallurgical coke in the Americas
Cokemaking business generates
~85% of Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
5.9 million tons of capacity in six facilities; five
in U.S. and one in Brazil
Four new plants since 2006 proves our ability
to permit, design, construct and start up
greenfield developments and work
internationally
Supply world class steelmakers: Arcelor
Mittal, US Steel and AK Steel
Coal mining operations represents
~15% of Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
2012 expected production of 1.6 million tons
114 million tons of primarily mid-vol.
metallurgical coal reserves in Virginia and
West Virginia
About SunCoke
About SunCoke
SunCoke
Cokemaking Capacity
(In thousands of tons)
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
3
(1)
For a definition and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, please see the appendix.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Jewell Coke
(Virginia)
Indiana Harbor
(Indiana)
Haverhill I
(Ohio)
Vitória
(Brazil)
Haverhill II
(Ohio)
Granite City
(Illinois)
Middletown
(Ohio)
2,490
4,190
4,740
5,390
5,390
5,940


Blast Furnaces and Coke
Blast Furnaces and Coke
4
1 short ton
of hot metal (NTHM)
Top Gas
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
BEST IN CLASS in lbs/ST
BEST IN CLASS in lbs/ST
Iron
Iron
burden
burden
Iron ore/
Iron ore/
pellets
pellets
Scrap
Scrap
3100
3100
198
198
Flux
Flux
Limestone
Limestone
30
30
Fuel
Fuel
Coke
Coke
600
600
BEST IN CLASS in lbs/ST
BEST IN CLASS in lbs/ST
Fuel
Fuel
Nat Gas
Nat Gas
Coal
Coal
Most efficient blast
Most efficient blast
furnaces require
furnaces require
800-900 lbs/NTHM
800-900 lbs/NTHM
of fuel to produce
of fuel to produce
a ton of hot metal
a ton of hot metal
Blast furnaces are the most
Blast furnaces are the most
efficient and proven method of
efficient and proven method of
reducing iron oxides
reducing iron oxides
into liquid iron
into liquid iron
Coke is a vital material to
Coke is a vital material to
blast furnace steel making
blast furnace steel making
We believe stronger, larger
We believe stronger, larger
coke is becoming more
coke is becoming more
important as blast furnaces
important as blast furnaces
seek to optimize fuel needs
seek to optimize fuel needs
Up to
80-120
Up to
120-180


SunCoke’s Cokemaking Technology
SunCoke’s Cokemaking Technology
5
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
Our industry-leading cokemaking technology meets
U.S. EPA Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards


SunCoke’s Heat Recovery vs. By-Product Oven
SunCoke’s Heat Recovery vs. By-Product Oven
Pressurization
Negative pressure
Positive pressure
Air Emissions
Meets U.S. EPA MACT standards 
Potential for emission of hazardous
compounds
Power Generation
Cogenerates power
Power consuming process
Hazardous Inputs
None
Yes – sulfuric acid
Volatile Organic Compounds
Complete combustion
No combustion
Solid Wastes
No toxic solid wastes
Process produces toxic waste streams
SunCoke Heat Recovery             Traditional By-Product
6
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference


SunCoke‘s Value Proposition
SunCoke‘s Value Proposition
Provide an assured supply of coke to steelmakers
Larger, stronger coke for improved blast furnace performance
Demonstrated sustained 15%-20% turndown
High quality coke with cheaper coal blends
Burn loss vs. by-product
Capital preservation and lower capacity cost per ton;
particularly relative to greenfield investment
Stringent U.S. regulatory environment
Power prices and reliability versus value of coke oven gas and
by-product "credits"
High Quality
& Reliable
Coke Supply
Turndown
Flexibility
Coal
Flexibility
Capital
Efficiency
& Flexibility
Environment
/Economic
Trade-offs
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
7


SunCoke’s Contract Proposition
SunCoke’s Contract Proposition
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
We deliver coke to customers through a competitive turnkey solution,
which produces a consistent stream of earnings
8
Capital Funding and Ownership
Permits and Approvals
Engineering, Procurement
& Construction
Plant Production and
Environmental Compliance
Reliable, High-Quality
Coke Supply
Take-Or-Pay
Fixed Fee
(Profit and Return on Capital)
Coal Cost Component
(Pass-Through)
Operating Cost Component
(Pass-Through)
Taxes, Transportation & Future
Environmental Costs
(Pass-Through)
What SunCoke Offers
Typical Key
Coke Contract Provisions
SunCoke
SunCoke
Energy
Energy
Customer
Customer


Q1 & Q2 2012 Earnings Overview
Results driven by strong Coke business
performance
Middletown startup has been a success
Continued improvement at Indiana Harbor
Strong operations at other facilities
Coal action plan progressing
Difficult demand/price environment
Taking action to reduce high cash
production costs
Achieved improved sequential quarter
performance
Strong liquidity position
Generated $66 million of free cash flow
(2)
in
first half 2012
Cash balance of $190 million and virtually
undrawn revolver of $150 million
(1)
For a definition and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, please see the appendix.
(2)
For a definition and reconciliation of free cash flow, please see the appendix.
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
9
$26.6
$55.8
$37.7
$65.5
2011
2012
Q1
Q2
Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
(in millions)
$0.17
$0.24
$0.32
$0.32
2011
2012
Q1
Q2
Earnings Per Share
(diluted)


Domestic Coke Business Summary
Domestic Coke Business Summary
(Jewell Coke & Other Domestic Coke)
(Jewell Coke & Other Domestic Coke)
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
10
Domestic
Coke
Production
Domestic Coke Adjusted EBITDA
(1) 
Per Ton
(Tons in thousands)
($ in millions, except per ton amounts)
Strong  performance driven by Middletown, Indiana Harbor and other operations
/Ton
/Ton
/Ton
(3)
/Ton
(2)
Q2 '11
Q3 '11
Q4 '11
Q1 '12
Q2 '12
Jewell
Indiana Harbor
Haverhill
Granite City
Middletown
177 
179 
176 
174 
176 
301 
314 
309 
291 
299 
276 
293 
289 
286 
291 
168 
179 
172 
175 
177 
68 
142 
153 
922 
965 
1,014 
1,095 
1,068 
$ 39
$ 50
$ 34
$ 51
$ 57
($ 60)
($ 40)
($ 20)
$ 0
$ 20
$ 40
$ 60
$ 80
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
Q2 '11
Q3 '11
Q4 '11
Q1 '12
Q2 '12
Jewell Coke Segment
Other Domestic Coke Segment
Adjusted EBITDA/ton
/ton
$11 
$14 
$11 
$15 
$13 
$25 
$34 
$21 
$40 
$49 
$36 
$48 
$32 
$55 
$61 
(1)
For a definition of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA/Ton and reconciliations, please see the appendix.
(2)
Includes Indiana Harbor contract billing adjustment of $6.0 million, net of NCI, and inventory
adjustment of $6.2 million, net of NCI, of which $3.1 million is attributable to Q3 2011.
(3)
Includes a $2.4 million, net of NCI, charge related to coke inventory reduction and a $1.3 million, net
of NCI,  lower cost or market adjustment on pad coal inventory and lower coal-to-coke yields related
to the startup at Middletown. 


Coal Mining Financial Summary
Coal Mining Financial Summary
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
11
(1)
For a definition and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, please see the appendix.
(2)
Average Sales Price is the weighted average sales price for all coal sales volumes, including sales to affiliates and sales to Jewell Coke.
(3)
Q4 2011 Adjusted EBITDA inclusive of Black Lung Liability charge of  $3.4 million and OPEB expense allocation of $1.8 million. 
Coal Sales, Production and Purchases
Cash production costs increasing in face of
difficult demand/price environment
Pricing up modestly, reflecting strong mid-vol.
pricing/volumes, offset by weak hi-vol. and thermal
pricing/volumes
Cash costs up $11/ton, reflecting decreased mix and
higher costs of hi-vol. and thermal production
Coal action plan implemented in Q1 2012
gaining traction
Focus on most productive mines to reduce costs
delivered sequential quarter improvement
Cash cost per ton at Jewell decreased from
$161  in Q1 2012 to $143 in Q2 2012
Jewell reject rates improved from 68% in Q1
2012 to 66% in Q2 2012
Expect further cash cost reductions for 2013
Intend to maintain cash neutral position in
2012
Reduced capital spending in line with outlook
Coal Mining Adjusted EBITDA
(1) 
and Avg. Sales
Price/Ton
(2)
($ in millions, except per ton amounts)
$11 
$9 
$2 
$7 
$9 
$162
$155
$159
$171
$167
$34 
$25 
$20 
$20 
$25 
$126 
$132 
$138 
$151 
$137 
Q2 '11
Q3 '11
Q4 '11(3)
Q1 '12
Q2 '12
Coal Adjusted EBITDA
Average Sales Price
Coal Adj EBITDA / ton
Coal Cash Cost / ton
Q2  '11
Q3  '11
Q4  '11
Q1  '12
Q2  '12
Coal Sales
334
371
363
373
365
Coal Producton
340
340
349
375
401
Purchased Coal
24
22
20
19
4


2012 Adjusted EBITDA
2012 Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
(1)
Outlook
Outlook
($ in millions)
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
12
(1)
For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, please see the appendix.
Strong U.S. cokemaking business expected to
drive increase in Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
in 2012
$141 
$250 -
$280 
$95 -
$110
$5 -
$15
$9 -
$14 
2011
Adjusted
EBITDA
Coke Business
Coal Mining
Corporate
Costs
2012 Adjusted
EBITDA
(1)
(1)


2012 Guidance
2012 Guidance
Metric
Expected 2012 Outlook
Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
$250 million –
$280 million
EPS* (at 22% tax rate)
$1.30 –
$1.65
Capital Expenditures
& Investments
Approximately $85 million
Free Cash Flow
(1)
$100 million +
Cash Tax Rate
10% –
15%
Effective Tax Rate
20% –
24%
Corporate Costs
$30 million –
$35 million
Coke Production
In excess of 4.3 million tons
Coal Production
Approximately 1.6 million tons
*Diluted
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
13
(1)
For a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow and their reconciliations, please see the appendix.


Strategies for Enhancing Shareholder Value
Strategies for Enhancing Shareholder Value
14
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference


KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
Source:  CRU, The Annual Outlook for Metallurgical Coke 2012.
Replace aging coke batteries operated by integrated steel producers
Source:  CRU, The Annual Outlook for Metallurgical Coke 2012
51% of coke capacity is at facilities >30 years old
Integrated
Integrated
Steel
Steel
Producers
Producers
63%
63%
SunCoke
18%
DTE
5%
Other Merchant
Other Merchant
& Foundry
& Foundry
6%
6%
Imports
Imports
8%
8%
Grow the Coke Business:
Grow the Coke Business:
U.S. and Canada
U.S. and Canada
15
Total 2011 Coke Demand: 19.5 million tons
9
37
27%
24%
SunCoke
U.S. &
Canada
(excl SXC)
30-40 years
40+ years
Aging Cokemaking Facilities
Average Age
%
of U.S. & Canada
coke production
U.S. & Canada Coke Supply


SunCoke believes it has the opportunity to displace higher cost coke imports
.
(US$/ton)
Source: Steel Business Briefing, 2012
(1)
Other Domestic Coke sales and other operating revenues less energy sales divided by
tons sold.
Grow the Coke Business:
Grow the Coke Business:
U.S. and Canada
U.S. and Canada
(1)
16
Source: CRU, Metallurgical Coke Market Outlook 2012
(Tons in millions)
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
Chinese Coke Price vs. Representative SunCoke Price
(1)
4.5 
4.8 
3.2 
5.2 
0.9 
2.0 
2.0 
2.0 
1.8 
1.6 
1.5 
1.7 
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012E2013E2014E2015E2016E
Imports
SunCoke sales volumes
$250
$350
$450
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Jan-12
SunCoke -
Other Domestic Coke
U.S. and Canada Coke Imports
Chinese Metallurgical Coke (FOB China port - adds $45 - $60/ton)


Coke Price Comparison
Coke Price Comparison
17
SunCoke’s coke is highly competitive on price,
quality and reliability versus imported coke
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
$529
Based on July 2012 prices
Representative
Delivered
Coke
Prices
-
$/ton
1
Includes approx. $50/ton freight and approx. $40/ton handling loss for shipping to Great Lakes region
2
Includes approx. $45/ton freight and approx. $30/ton handling loss for shipping to Great Lakes region
SunCoke Coke Price @ Spot Coal Price
SunCoke
Price
-
Contracted
Coal
Price
Differential
Chinese Coke Price
Chinese 40% Export Tax Premium (Tariff)
$348
$48
$331
$402
$127
Other Domestic Coke
Ukrainian
Coke (2)
Chinese
Coke (1)
$396
$331
Source:  World Price (DTC), Coke Market Report, CRU and  company estimates


Natural Gas in The Blast Furnace
Natural Gas in The Blast Furnace
Impact of Low Natural Gas Prices
Natural gas cannot completely replace
coke in blast furnace
We estimate natural gas and other
injectants can replace up to about 30%
The less coke used the more important
the coke’s quality
Alternative technologies take time to
implement, require significant capital
commitments and are energy intensive
Coke oven gases produced by
integrated steelmakers’
own coke
ovens is less valuable in low cost
natural gas environment, potentially
impacting steelmakers’
future
reinvest/rebuild decisions
Blast Furnace Fuel Pricing
18
Source:  CRU, SXC Analysis
US$/MMBtu
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference


Grow the Coke Business:
Grow the Coke Business:
U.S. and Canada
U.S. and Canada
19
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
Permit a potential new
multi-customer
660k/TPY U.S. plant
SunCoke’s
North America
Strategy
Explore acquisition of
existing coke assets
U.S.  and Canada
Potential Coke Market 
Opportunity
Import displacement
and demand growth
Aging battery
replacement
Expected demand opportunity
by 2015
3
2
in millions of tons
5


Sources:  CRU, The Annual Outlook for
Metallurgical Coke 2011,  CIA World Factbook.
Grow the Coke Business:
Grow the Coke Business:
International -
International -
India
India
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
20
India
Steel/Coke
Market
Growing Steel
Market
Blast furnace to play a critical
role in growth
Coke supply
Deficit
Importing approximately           
2 million tons annually
Coke capacity investment lags
steel investment
Active
Merchant
Market
3.5 million tons merchant
production or 13% of total
17 active merchant
coke producers
Electric Power
Deficit
10% -
20% short power
Average wholesale price >$80
mwh (2x U.S. rate)
Projected
to
be
3rd
largest
steel
market by 2020
Committed to
Committed to
India entry
India entry
strategy
strategy
Discussing
Discussing
opportunities in
opportunities in
India
India
Targeting
Targeting
potential entry
potential entry
by early 2013
by early 2013


Master Limited Partnership
Master Limited Partnership
Filed S-1 on August 8, 2012
Expected Assets/Structure
At closing of offering, MLP will
own 60% interest in Haverhill
and Middletown
SXC to own General Partner,
incentive distribution rights and
a portion of the partnership
units
Proceeds to SXC
Expected uses will include paying
down debt, funding expansion
and other general corporate
purposes
Timing
Expect to close no sooner than
fourth quarter 2012
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
21
Middletown Operations
Haverhill Operations


Appendix


Definitions
Adjusted EBITDA
represents
earnings
before
interest,
taxes,
depreciation,
depletion
and
amortization
(“EBITDA”)
adjusted for sales discounts and the deduction of income attributable to non-controlling interests in our Indiana
Harbor
cokemaking
operations.
EBITDA
reflects
sales
discounts
included
as
a
reduction
in
sales
and
other
operating
revenue.
The
sales
discounts
represent
the
sharing
with
our
customers
of
a
portion
of
nonconventional
fuels
tax
credits,
which
reduce
our
income
tax
expense.
However,
we
believe
that
our
Adjusted
EBITDA
would
be
inappropriately penalized if these discounts were treated as a reduction of EBITDA since they represent sharing of a
tax benefit which is not included in EBITDA. Accordingly, in computing Adjusted EBITDA, we have added back these
sales
discounts.
Our
Adjusted
EBITDA
also
reflects
the
deduction
of
income
attributable
to
noncontrolling
interest
in
our Indiana Harbor cokemaking operations. EBITDA and  Adjusted EBITDA do not represent and should not be
considered alternatives to net income or operating income under United States generally accepted
accounting
principles
(GAAP)
and
may
not
be
comparable
to
other
similarly
titled
measures
of
other
businesses.
Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure of the operating performance of the Company’s
assets and is indicative of the Company’s ability to generate cash from operations.
Adjusted
EBITDA/Ton
represents
Adjusted
EBITDA
divided
by
tons
sold.
Free Cash Flow
equals cash from operations less cash used in investing activities less cash distributions to non-
controlling
interests.
Management
believes
Free
Cash
Flow
information
enhances
an
investor’s
understanding
of a
business’
ability to generate cash.  Free Cash Flow does not represent and should not be considered an alternative to
net
income
or
cash
flows
from
operating
activities
as
determined
under
GAAP
and
may
not
be
comparable
to
other
similarly titled measures of other businesses.
KeyBanc
2012 Basic Materials Conference
23


Reconciliations
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
24
$ in millions
Q2  2012
Q1  2012
FY  2011
Q4  2011
Q3  2011
Q2  2011
Q1  2011
Adjusted Operating Income
46.6
37.1
80.4
14.9
33.5
24.6
7.4
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
1.3
(0.3)
(1.7)
(0.5)
3.4
1.6
(6.2)
Subtract: Depreciation Expense
(20.2)
(18.4)
(58.4)
(16.0)
(14.7)
(14.7)
(13.0)
Adjusted EBITDA
65.5
55.8
140.5
31.4
44.8
37.7
26.6
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(20.2)
(18.4)
(58.4)
(16.0)
(14.7)
(14.7)
(13.0)
Subtract: Financing expense, net
(11.8)
(12.0)
(1.4)
(7.1)
(3.3)
4.5
4.5
Subtract: Income Tax
(7.0)
(5.3)
(7.2)
2.9
(5.1)
(1.9)
(3.1)
Subtract: Sales Discount
(3.8)
(3.2)
(12.9)
(3.2)
(3.5)
(3.1)
(3.1)
Add: Net Income attributable to NCI
1.3
(0.3)
(1.7)
(0.5)
3.4
1.6
(6.2)
Net Income
24.0
16.6
58.9
7.5
21.6
24.1
5.7
Reconciliations from Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income


Reconciliations
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
25
$ in millions, except per ton data
Jewell Coke
Other
Domestic
Coke
International
Coke
Jewell Coal
Corporate
Combined
Domestic
Coke
Q2 2012
Adjusted EBITDA
12.5
48.6
0.7
9.3
(5.6)
65.5
61.1
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(1.3)
(13.7)
(0.1)
(4.3)
(0.8)
(20.2)
(15.0)
Add (Subtract): Net (Income) loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests
1.3
1.3
1.3
Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income
11.2
36.2
0.6
5.0
(6.4)
46.6
47.4
Adjusted EBITDA
12.5
48.6
0.7
9.3
(5.6)
65.5
61.1
Sales Volume (thousands of tons)
170
892
358
373
1,062
Adjusted EBITDA per Ton
73.5
54.5
2.0
24.9
57.5
Q1 2012
Adjusted EBITDA
15.0
40.1
0.1
7.4
(6.8)
55.8
55.1
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(1.3)
(12.6)
(0.1)
(4.1)
(0.3)
(18.4)
(13.9)
Add (Subtract): Net (Income) loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests
(0.3)
(0.3)
(0.3)
Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income
13.7
27.2
-
3.3
(7.1)
37.1
40.9
Adjusted EBITDA
15.0
40.1
0.1
7.4
(6.8)
55.8
55.1
Sales Volume (thousands of tons)
186
892
358
373
1,078
Adjusted EBITDA per Ton
80.6
45.0
0.3
19.8
51.1
Reconciliations from Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income


Reconciliations
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
26
$ in millions, except per ton data
Jewell Coke
Other
Domestic
Coke
International
Coke
Jewell Coal
Corporate
Combined
Domestic
Coke
Q4 2011
Adjusted EBITDA
10.6
21.3
10.2
2.5
(13.2)
31.4
31.9
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(1.2)
(10.6)
(0.1)
(3.7)
(0.4)
(16.0)
(11.8)
Add (Subtract): Net (Income) loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.5)
Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income
9.4
10.2
10.1
(1.2)
(13.6)
14.9
19.6
Adjusted EBITDA
10.6
21.3
10.2
2.5
(13.2)
31.4
31.9
Sales Volume (thousands of tons)
166
837
295
363
1,003
Adjusted EBITDA per Ton
63.9
25.4
34.6
6.9
31.8
Q3 2011
Adjusted EBITDA
13.9
34.3
1.7
9.2
(14.3)
44.8
48.2
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(1.2)
(9.9)
-
(3.3)
(0.3)
(14.7)
(11.1)
Add (Subtract): Net (Income) loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests
3.4
3.4
3.4
Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income
12.7
27.8
1.7
5.9
(14.6)
33.5
40.5
Adjusted EBITDA
13.9
34.3
1.7
9.2
(14.3)
44.8
48.2
Sales Volume (thousands of tons)
191
777
373
371
968
Adjusted EBITDA per Ton
72.8
44.1
4.6
24.8
49.8
Reconciliations from Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income


Reconciliations
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
27
$ in millions, except per ton data
Jewell Coke
Other
Domestic
Coke
International
Coke
Jewell Coal
Corporate
Combined
Domestic
Coke
Q2 2011
Adjusted EBITDA
10.6
25.3
0.8
11.5
(10.5)
37.7
35.9
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(1.4)
(9.6)
(0.1)
(3.2)
(0.4)
(14.7)
(11.0)
Add (Subtract): Net (Income) loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests
1.6
1.6
1.6
Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income
9.2
17.3
0.7
8.3
(10.9)
24.6
26.5
Adjusted EBITDA
10.6
25.3
0.8
11.5
(10.5)
37.7
35.9
Sales Volume (thousands of tons)
170
757
412
334
927
Adjusted EBITDA per Ton
62.4
33.4
1.9
34.4
38.7
Q1 2011
Adjusted EBITDA
11.0
8.5
1.0
12.3
(6.2)
26.6
19.5
Subtract: Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(1.1)
(8.6)
-
(2.7)
(0.6)
(13.0)
(9.7)
Add (Subtract): Net (Income) loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests
(6.2)
(6.2)
(6.2)
Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income
9.9
(6.3)
1.0
9.6
(6.8)
7.4
3.6
Adjusted EBITDA
11.0
8.5
1.0
12.3
(6.2)
26.6
19.5
Sales Volume (thousands of tons)
175
697
362
386
872
Adjusted EBITDA per Ton
62.9
12.2
2.8
31.9
22.4
Reconciliations from Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted Pre-Tax Operating Income


(in millions)
       2012E
       Low 
       2012E
       High 
Net Income
$98
$122
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
74
72
Total financing costs, net
48
46
Income tax expense
25
37
EBITDA
$245
$277
Sales discounts
11
10
Noncontrolling interests
(6)
(7)
Adjusted EBITDA
$250
$280
Estimated EBITDA Reconciliation
2012E Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
28


Free Cash Flow Reconciliations
2012E Estimated Free Cash Flow Reconciliation
KeyBanc 2012 Basic Materials Conference
29
(in millions)
1   Half
2012
Cash from operations
$   86.7
Less cash used for investing activities
(20.7)
Less payments to minority interest
( -
)
Free Cash Flow
$     66.0
(in millions)
2012
Cash from operations
In excess of
$   189
Less cash used for investing activities
Approx.
(85)
Less payments to minority interest
Approx.
(4)
Free Cash Flow
In excess of
$     100
First Half 2012 Free Cash Flow Reconciliation
st