Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Accounting

The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein include the accounts of the General Partner and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the OP. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 of the Company, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2020. Information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and U.S. GAAP.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and a consolidated joint venture. The portion of the consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company is presented as non-controlling interest in VEREIT’s and the OP’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income and statements of changes in equity. In addition, certain third parties have been issued OP Units and Series F Preferred Units. Holders of OP Units are considered to be non-controlling interest holders in the OP and their ownership interest in the limited partner’s share is presented as non-controlling interests in VEREIT’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income and statements of changes in equity. Further, a portion of the earnings and losses of the OP are allocated to non-controlling interest holders based on their respective ownership percentages. Equity is reallocated between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP upon a change in ownership. At the end of each annual reporting period, noncontrolling interests in the OP are adjusted to reflect their ownership percentage in the OP through a reallocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests in the OP, as applicable. As of each of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there were approximately 0.8 million Limited Partner OP Units issued and outstanding, and 49,766 Limited Partner Series F Preferred Units issued and outstanding.

For legal entities being evaluated for consolidation, the Company must first determine whether the interests that it holds and fees it receives qualify as variable interests in the entity. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. The Company’s evaluation includes consideration of fees paid to the Company where the Company acts as a decision maker or service provider to the entity being evaluated. If the Company determines that it holds a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether that entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). VIEs are entities where investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or where equity investors, as a group, lack one of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) the right to receive the expected returns of the entity. The Company consolidates entities that are not VIEs if it has a majority voting interest or other rights that result in effectively controlling the entity.

The Company then qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is generally defined as the party who has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and its obligation to absorb losses from or right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates any VIEs when the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the difference between consolidating the VIE and accounting for it using the equity method could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate these VIEs based on standards set forth in U.S. GAAP.

Reclassification

The fees from managed partnerships, which are fees earned from the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture entities, previously included in other income (loss), net have been presented in its own line item for prior periods presented to be consistent with the current year presentation.

Revenue Recognition

Rental Revenue

The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent, straight-line rent and property operating expense reimbursements and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. The review includes a binary assessment of whether or not substantially all of the amounts due under a tenant’s lease agreement are probable of collection. For leases that are deemed probable of collection, revenue continues to be recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term and the Company recognizes a general allowance on a portfolio-wide basis. For leases that are deemed not probable of collection, revenue is recorded as cash is received and the Company reduces rental revenue for any straight-line rent receivables. The Company recognizes all changes in the collectability assessment for an operating lease as an adjustment to rental revenue. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, rental revenue was reduced by $13.2 million and $18.5 million, respectively, which included (i) $2.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of an increase to the general allowance, (ii) $7.4 million and $9.4 million, respectively, for amounts not probable of collection, and (iii) $3.7 million and $7.6 million, respectively, for straight-line rent receivables. Of the $13.2 million reduction to rental revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020, $8.4 million was related to the impact of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, of which $0.9 million represented an increase to the general allowance, $3.8 million represented amounts not probable of collection, and $3.7 million was for straight-line rent receivables.

Rental revenue also includes lease termination income collected from tenants to allow for the tenant to vacate their space prior to their scheduled termination dates, as well as amortization of above and below-market leases.

Accounting for Lease Concessions Related to the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The FASB issued a question-and-answer document, Accounting for Lease Concessions Related to the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic for concessions related to the effects of COVID-19 that provide a deferral of payments with no substantive changes to the consideration of the original contract allows an entity to elect to not analyze each contract to determine whether enforceable rights and obligations for concessions exist in the contract and to elect to apply or not apply the lease modification guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), to those contracts (the “COVID-19 Lease Concessions Relief”). For eligible concessions, the Company has elected not to apply the lease modification guidance in ASC 842. As such, the Company accounts for eligible deferral concessions as if there were no changes made to the lease agreement and, accordingly, continues to recognize income and increases the lease receivable. Ineligible concessions are accounted for as a lease modification under ASC 842, which requires the Company to reevaluate the lease classification and remeasure and reallocate the consideration over the remaining lease term, and include any prepaid rent liabilities and accrued rent assets relating to the original lease as part of the lease payments for the modified lease.

During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the Company had $3.6 million of rental revenue related to deferral agreements executed through June 30, 2020 and $5.3 million related to deferral agreements executed from July 1, 2020 through July 27, 2020, which qualify for the COVID-19 Lease Concessions Relief. The Company did not record rental revenue for $11.2 million of second quarter rental revenue abated pursuant to lease amendments executed through June 30, 2020, which increased the weighted average lease term for the related properties.

Fees from Managed Partnerships

The Company provides various services to our unconsolidated joint venture entities in exchange for fees. Total asset and property management and acquisition fees earned in connection with these entities was $0.4 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $1.0 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Litigation and non-routine costs, net

The Company has incurred legal fees and other costs associated with litigations and investigations resulting from the Audit Committee Investigation (defined below), which are considered non-routine. The Company’s insurance carriers have paid certain defense costs subject to standard reservation of rights under the respective policies.

Litigation and non-routine costs, net include the following costs and recoveries (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2020			2019
Litigation and non-routine costs, net:
Audit Committee Investigation and related matters ^{(1) (2)}	$	(118	)	$	22,767		$	(6,211	)	$	37,458
Legal fees and expenses	—			—			—			2
Litigation settlements	—			—			—			12,235
Total costs	(118		)	22,767			(6,211		)	49,695
Insurance recoveries	—			—			(2,471		)	(48,420		)
Other recoveries ⁽³⁾	—			(26,536		)	—			(26,536		)
Total	$	(118	)	$	(3,769	)	$	(8,682	)	$	(25,261	)

___________________________________

(1)

Includes all fees and costs associated with various litigations and investigations prompted by the results of the 2014 investigation conducted by the audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee Investigation”), including fees and costs incurred pursuant to the Company’s advancement obligations, litigation related thereto and in connection with related insurance recovery matters, net of accrual reversals.


(2)	The negative balance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 is a result of estimated costs accrued in prior periods that exceeded actual expenses incurred.


(3)	Represents the surrender of 2.9 million Limited Partner OP Units in connection with an SEC settlement entered into by principals of the Company’s former external manager.

Equity-based Compensation

The Company has an equity-based incentive award plan (the “Equity Plan”) for non-executive directors, officers, other employees and advisors or consultants who provide services to the Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under U.S. GAAP for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met. As of June 30, 2020, the General Partner had cumulatively awarded under its Equity Plan approximately 18.0 million shares of Common Stock, which was comprised of 4.0 million restricted share awards (“Restricted Shares”), net of the forfeiture of 3.7 million Restricted Shares through that date, 7.9 million restricted stock units (“Restricted Stock Units”), net of the forfeiture/cancellation of 2.0 million Restricted Stock Units through that date, 0.8 million deferred stock units (“Deferred Stock Units”), and 5.3 million stock options (“Stock Options”), net of forfeiture/cancellation of 0.3 million Stock Options through that date. Accordingly, as of such date, approximately 95.1 million additional shares were available for future issuance, excluding the effect of the 5.3 million Stock Options. At June 30, 2020, a total of 45,000 shares were awarded under the non-executive director restricted share plan out of the 99,000 shares reserved for issuance.

The following is a summary of equity-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Restricted Shares	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	77
Time-Based Restricted Stock Units ⁽¹⁾	1,397		1,234		2,782		2,484
Long-Term Incentive-Based Restricted Stock Units	1,401		1,383		2,500		2,612
Deferred Stock Units	947		947		1,019		1,018
Stock Options	326		319		625		564
Total	$	4,071	$	3,883	$	6,926	$	6,755

___________________________________


(1)	Includes stock compensation expense attributable to awards for which the requisite service period begins prior to the assumed future grant date.

As of June 30, 2020, total unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards was approximately $21.9 million, with an aggregate weighted-average remaining term of 2.5 years.

Restructuring

During the six months ended June 30, 2020, there were no restructuring expenses recorded. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company’s obligation to provide certain transition services for CCA Acquisition, LLC (the “Cole Purchaser”) terminated in accordance with the terms of a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with the Cole Purchaser and the Company recorded $9.4 million of restructuring expenses related to the reorganization of its business.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Financial Instruments - Credit Losses

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses and subsequent amendments (collectively Topic 326), effective January 1, 2020. Topic 326 was intended to improve financial reporting by requiring more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income and required that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that was deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in Topic 326 required the Company to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets and eliminated the “incurred loss” methodology under current U.S. GAAP.

Upon adoption, the Company determined the following to be within the scope of Topic 326: (i) investments in direct financing leases and (ii) other immaterial miscellaneous short term receivables. Due to the short term nature and collection history of the direct financing leases and management fee receivables and the creditworthiness of the direct financing lease tenants, the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Reference Rate Reform

During the first quarter of 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). ASU 2020-04 contains practical expedients for reference rate reform related activities that impact debt, leases, derivatives and other contracts. The guidance in ASU 2020-04 is optional and may be elected over time as reference rate reform activities occur. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company elected to apply the hedge accounting expedients related to probability and the assessments of effectiveness for future London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”)-indexed cash flows to assume that the index upon which future hedged transactions will be based matches the index on the corresponding derivatives. Application of these expedients preserves the presentation of derivatives consistent with past presentation. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance and may apply other elections as applicable as additional changes in the market occur.