XML 72 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. The guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. However, the Company expects that changes in classifications between levels will be infrequent.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2014, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As of March 31, 2014, the Company’s interest rate cap derivative measured at fair value on a recurring basis was zero and was classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities (including derivatives that are presented net) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall (in thousands):


Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
Level 1

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 3

Balance as of
March 31, 2014
Assets:








Investments in real estate fund
 
$

 
$
1,648

 
$

 
$
1,648

CMBS
 

 

 
212,155

 
212,155

Interest rate swap assets


 
9,829

 


9,829

Total assets
 
$

 
$
11,477

 
$
212,155

 
$
223,632

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap liabilities

$

 
$
(8,737
)
 
$


$
(8,737
)
Series D Preferred Stock embedded derivative


 

 
(26,734
)

(26,734
)
Contingent consideration arrangements
 

 

 
(4,903
)
 
(4,903
)
Total liabilities

$


$
(8,737
)

$
(31,637
)

$
(40,374
)









 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
Level 1

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 3

Balance as of December 31, 2013
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in real estate fund
 
$

 
$
1,484

 
$

 
$
1,484

CMBS
 

 

 
60,583

 
60,583

Interest rate swap assets
 

 
9,189

 

 
9,189

Total assets
 
$

 
$
10,673

 
$
60,583

 
$
71,256

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap liabilities
 
$

 
$
(1,719
)
 
$

 
$
(1,719
)
Series D Preferred Stock embedded derivative
 

 

 
(16,736
)
 
(16,736
)
Total liabilities
 
$

 
$
(1,719
)
 
$
(16,736
)
 
$
(18,455
)

Investments in real estate fund — The fair value of the Company’s investments in real estate fund are based published pricing.
CMBS — The fair values of the Company’s CMBS are valued using broker quotations, collateral values, subordination levels and liquidity of the individual securities.
Derivatives — The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.
Series D Preferred Stock embedded derivative — The valuation of this derivative instrument is determined using a binomial option pricing model. Key inputs in the model include the expected term, risk-free interest rate, volatility and dividend yield.
Contingent Consideration Arrangements — The contingent consideration arrangements are carried at fair value and are valued using Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the contingent payments related to property acquisitions is determined based on the estimated timing and probability of successfully leasing vacant space subsequent to the Company’s acquisition of certain properties. The estimated fair value of the property-related contingent consideration arrangements totaled $4.9 million as of March 31, 2014 and is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in deferred rent, derivative and other liabilities. There were no property related contingent consideration arrangements as of December 31, 2013.
The fair value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, due to affiliates and accounts payable approximate their carrying value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets due to their short-term nature and are classified as Level 1 under the fair value hierarchy.
A review of the fair value hierarchy classification is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for the changes in instruments with Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (in thousands):
 
 
CMBS
 
Series D Preferred Stock Embedded Derivative
 
Contingent Consideration
Arrangements
 
Total
Beginning Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
$
60,583

 
$
(16,736
)
 
$

 
$
43,847

Total gains and losses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income, net
 
2,948

 

 

 
2,948

Changes in fair value included in net income, net
 

 
(9,998
)
 
(1,297
)
 
(11,295
)
Purchases, issuances, settlements and amortization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases/issuances
 
151,197

 

 
(3,606
)
 
147,591

Amortization included in net income, net
 
(2,573
)
 
$

 

 
(2,573
)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2014
 
$
212,155

 
$
(26,734
)
 
$
(4,903
)
 
$
180,518




The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments that are not reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are reported below (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Carrying Amount at
 
Fair Value at
 
Carrying Amount at
 
Fair Value at
 
 
Level
 
March 31, 2014
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2013
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans held for investment
 
3
 
$
98,185

 
$
98,652

 
$
26,279

 
$
26,435

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage notes payable, net
 
3
 
$
4,234,668

 
$
4,265,230

 
$
1,301,114

 
$
1,305,823

Corporate bonds, net
 
3
 
$
2,545,884

 
$
2,545,884

 
$

 
$

Convertible debt, net
 
3
 
$
973,737

 
$
976,629

 
$
972,490

 
$
976,629

Senior corporate credit facility
 
3
 
2,265,800

 
2,265,800

 
1,819,800

 
1,819,800

Secured term loan
 
3
 
53,958

 
54,035

 
58,979

 
59,049

Trust preferred notes
 
3
 
26,563

 
23,485

 
26,548

 
23,345

Unsecured credit facility
 
3
 
150,000

 
150,000

 
150,000

 
150,000

Other debt
 
3
 
68,288

 
68,414

 
19,278

 
19,350

Total liabilities
 
 
 
$
10,318,898

 
$
10,349,477

 
$
4,348,209

 
$
4,353,996


Loans held for investment — The fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate loan portfolio is estimated with a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing scheduled cash flows and discount rates estimated by management to approximate those that a willing buyer and seller might use.
Credit facilities — Management believes that the stated interest rates (which float based on short-term interest rates) approximates market rates. As such, the fair values of these obligations is estimated to be equal to the outstanding principal amounts.
Convertible notes, mortgage notes payable and secured term loan — The fair value of mortgages payable on real estate investments and the secured term loan is estimated by an independent third party using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on management’s estimates of market interest rates.
Trust preferred notes — The fair value of the Company’s other long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on management’s estimates of market interest rates.