XML 71 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Accounting

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Deferred Charges, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Deferred Costs, Net

Deferred costs, net consists of deferred financing costs net of accumulated amortization, deferred leasing costs net of accumulated amortization and deferred offering costs.

Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal fees, and other costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financial transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined the financing will not close. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $15.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, of deferred financing costs net of accumulated amortization.

Deferred leasing costs, consisting primarily of lease commissions and payments made to assume existing leases, are deferred and amortized over the term of the lease. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of deferred leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization.

Deferred offering costs represent professional fees, fees paid to various regulatory agencies, and other costs incurred in connection with registering to sell shares of the Company's common stock. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $0.1 million of deferred offering costs related to the Company's $500.0 million universal shelf and resale registration statements filed with the SEC in August 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had no deferred offering costs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued guidance that expands the existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements, primarily for Level 3 measurements, which are measurements based on unobservable inputs such as the Company’s own data. This guidance is largely consistent with current fair value measurement principles with few exceptions that do not result in a change in general practice. The guidance was applied prospectively and was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations as the guidance relates only to disclosure requirements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance requiring entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement – referred to as the statement of comprehensive income – or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. The new guidance does not change which components of comprehensive income are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income, or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. In December 2011, the FASB deferred certain provisions of this guidance related to the presentation of certain reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income, by component in both the statement and the statement where the reclassification is presented. This guidance was applied prospectively and was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ended after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations but changed the location of the presentation of other comprehensive income to more closely associate the disclosure with net income.

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance that allows entities to perform a qualitative analysis as the first step in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then a quantitative analysis for impairment is not required. The guidance was effective for interim and annual impairment tests for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance which contains new disclosure requirements regarding the nature of and entity's rights of offset and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The new disclosures are designed to make financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards and will give the financial statement users information about both gross and net exposures. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In July 2012, the FASB issued revised guidance intended to simplify how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The amendments will allow an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative test unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption was permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In determining whether the Company has a controlling financial interest in a joint venture and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, management considers factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions and contractual and substantive participating rights of the other partners or members as well as whether the entity is a variable interest entity for which the Company is the primary beneficiary.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the previously issued historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and ARCT III to conform to this consolidated presentation.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding revenue recognition, to record investments in real estate, real estate taxes, and derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, as applicable.

Development Stage Company [Policy Text Block]

Formation Transactions

Upon the effectiveness of the IPO, the Company acquired certain properties from affiliated entities of the Company and, as such, the Company was no longer considered to be in the development stage. The contribution of the properties from affiliates in the initial formation of the Company was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control and therefore all assets and liabilities related to the contributed properties were accounted for on the carryover basis of accounting whereby the real estate investments were contributed at amortized cost and all assets and liabilities of the predecessor entities became assets and liabilities of the Company.

Real Estate, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Real Estate Investments

The Company records acquired real estate at cost and makes assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. The Company considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for building fixtures and improvements and the remaining lease term for acquired intangible lease assets.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

Operations related to properties that have been sold or properties that are intended to be sold are presented as discontinued operations in the statement of operations for all periods presented, and properties intended to be sold are designated as “held for sale” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

When circumstances indicate the carrying value of a property may not be recoverable, the Company reviews the asset for impairment. This review is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. These estimates consider factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists, due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property for properties to be held and used.

For properties held for sale, the impairment loss is the adjustment to fair value less estimated cost to dispose of the asset. These assessments have a direct impact on net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. At December 31, 2012, and 2011, the Company had one and two, respectively, vacant properties classified as properties held for sale. See Note 17 — Discontinued Operations and Properties Held for Sale.

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets [Policy Text Block]

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, equipment and tenant improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Estimates of value are made using customary methods, including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and other methods. Identifiable intangible assets include amounts allocated to acquire leases for above- and below-market lease rates, the value of in-place leases, and the value of customer relationships.

Amounts allocated to land, buildings, equipment and fixtures are based on cost segregation studies performed by independent third-parties or on the Company's analysis of comparable properties in its portfolio. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of forty years for buildings, five to ten years for building equipment and fixtures, and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements.

The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by the Company in its analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 18 months. The Company also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management's estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease intangibles are amortized as a decrease to rental income over the remaining term of the lease. The capitalized below-market lease values will be amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining term and any fixed rate renewal periods provided within the respective leases. In determining the amortization period for below-market lease intangibles, the Company initially will consider, and periodically evaluate on a quarterly basis, the likelihood that a lessee will execute the renewal option. The likelihood that a lessee will execute the renewal option is determined by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located.

The aggregate value of intangibles assets related to customer relationships is measured based on the Company's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and the Company's overall relationship with the tenant. Characteristics considered by the Company in determining these values include the nature and extent of the Company's existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant's credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors.

The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which range primarily from 2 to 20 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles is amortized to expense over the initial term and any renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles is charged to expense.

In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.

Intangible lease assets of the Company consist of the following as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in thousands):



	December 31,
	2012			2011
In-place leases, gross	$	210,959		$	21,777
Accumulated amortization on in-place leases	(11,183		)	(3,282		)
In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization	199,776			18,495

Above market leases, gross	1,264			—
Accumulated amortization on above market leases	(116		)	—
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization	1,148			—
Total intangible lease assets, net	$	200,924		$	18,495

The following table provides the weighted-average amortization period as of December 31, 2012 for intangible lease assets and the projected amortization expense and adjustments of rental income for the next five years of the Company (amounts in thousands):



	Weighted-Average Amortization Period in Years	2013		2014		2015		2016		2017
In-place leases:
Total to be included in amortization expense	11.9	$	19,265	$	19,234	$	18,855	$	18,586	$	18,049
Above market leases:
Total to be included in rental income	5.0	$	252	$	252	$	252	$	252	$	122
Total intangible lease assets	11.9

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in bank accounts as well as investments in highly-liquid money market funds with original maturities of three months or less.

The Company deposits cash with high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (“FDIC”) up to an insurance limit. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had deposits of $156.9 million and $19.3 million, respectively, of which $154.8 million and $18.5 million were in excess of the amount insured by the FDIC. Although the Company bears risk to amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it does not anticipate any losses as a result.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily consists of reserves related to lease expirations as well as maintenance, structural, and debt service reserves.

Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Derivative Instruments

The Company may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its borrowings. Certain of the techniques used to hedge exposure to interest rate fluctuations may also be used to protect against declines in the market value of assets that result from general trends in debt markets. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company's operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.

The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.

The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether each has been designed and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. If the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting treatment, any changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized immediately in gains (losses) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statement of operations. If the derivative is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment the change in the estimated fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent that it is effective. Any ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

Upon the acquisition of real estate, certain properties will have leases where minimum rent payments increase during the term of the lease. The Company will record rental revenue for the full term of each lease on a straight-line basis. When the Company acquires a property, the term of existing leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. Cost recoveries from tenants are included in tenant reimbursement income in the period the related costs are incurred, as applicable.

The Company's revenues, which are derived primarily from rental income, include rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of each lease reported on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Since many of the leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting requires the Company to record a receivable, and include in revenues, unbilled rent receivables that the Company will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. The Company defers the revenue related to lease payments received from tenants in advance of their due dates.

The Company continually reviews receivables related to rent and unbilled rent receivables and determines collectability by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of a receivable is in doubt, the Company will record an increase in the allowance for uncollectible accounts or record a direct write-off of the receivable in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company determined that there was no allowance for uncollectible accounts necessary.

Offering and Related Costs

Offering and related costs include costs incurred in connection with the Company's issuance of common stock. These costs include, but are not limited to, (i) legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees; (ii) escrow related fees, and (iii) reimbursement to the Dealer Manager for amounts they paid to reimburse the bonified due diligence expenses of broker-dealers.

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

Share-Based Compensation

The Company has a stock-based incentive award plan for its affiliated Manager, non-executive directors, officers, other employees and independent contractors who are providing services to the Company, as applicable, and a non-executive director restricted share plan, which are accounted for under the guidance for share-based payments. The expense for such awards is included in general and administrative expenses and is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met. See Note 12 — Share-Based Compensation for additional information on these plans.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Taxes

Each of the Company and ARCT III qualified as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. Being qualified for taxation as a REIT, each of the Company and ARCT III generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent it distributes its REIT taxable income to its stockholders, and so long as it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income. REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Each of the Company and ARCT III may still be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Per Share Data

Income (loss) per basic share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) less dividends on unvested restricted stock and dividends on preferred shares by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted income (loss) per share of common stock considers the effect of potentially dilutive shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reportable Segments

The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in real estate. The Company's investments in real estate generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of properties, which comprised 100% of its total consolidated revenues. Although the Company's investments in real estate will be geographically diversified throughout the United States, management evaluates operating performance on an individual property level. The Company's properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment.

Share Repurchase Program [Policy Text Block]

Share Repurchase Program

ARCT III's board of directors had adopted a Share Repurchase Program (“SRP”) that enabled stockholders to sell their shares to ARCT III in limited circumstances. The SRP permitted investors to sell their shares back to ARCT III after they had held them for at least one year, subject to the significant conditions and limitations described below.

The purchase price per share depended on the length of time investors had held such shares as follows: after one year from the purchase date — the lower of $9.25 or 92.5% of the amount they actually paid for each share; after two years from the purchase date —the lower of $9.50 or 95.0% of the amount they actually paid for each share; after three years from the purchase date — the lower of $9.75 or 97.5% of the amount they actually paid for each share; and after four years from the purchase date — the lower of $10.00 or 100% of the amount they actually paid for each share.

ARCT III was only authorized to repurchase shares pursuant to the SRP up to the value of shares issued under the DRIP and limited the amount spent to repurchase shares in a given quarter to the value of the shares issued under the DRIP in that same quarter.

When a stockholder requested repurchases and the repurchases were approved by ARCT III’s board of directors, it reclassified such obligation from equity to a liability based on the settlement value of the obligation. The following table reflects the number of shares repurchased for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. There were no repurchases requested or fulfilled during the period from October 15, 2010 (“ARCT III's date of inception”) to December 31, 2010.



Year ended December 31,	Number of Requests	Number of Shares	Average Price per Share
2011	1	2,375	$	10.00
2012	73	179,104	9.93
Cumulative repurchase requests as of December 31, 2012 ⁽¹⁾	74	181,479	$	9.93

_____________________________

(1) Includes unfulfilled repurchase requests for 35,180 shares at a average price per share of $9.86, which were approved for repurchase as of December 31, 2012.

Upon the Merger the SRP was terminated.

Distribution reinvestment Plan, policy [Policy Text Block]

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

Pursuant to the ARCT III distribution reinvestment plan or ("DRIP"), stockholders could have elected to reinvest distributions by purchasing shares of ARCT III common stock in lieu of receiving cash. No dealer manager fees or selling commissions were paid with respect to shares purchased pursuant to the DRIP. Participants purchasing shares pursuant to the DRIP had the same rights and were treated in the same manner as if such shares were issued pursuant to ARCT III's initial public offering (the "ARCT III IPO"). Shares issued under the DRIP were recorded within stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in the period distributions were declared. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, ARCT III issued 2.7 million and 27,169 shares of common stock, respectively, with a value of $26.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in each case with a par value per share of $0.01, pursuant to the DRIP. Upon the Merger, the DRIP was terminated.