SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2023 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
|
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements |
|
A. |
Use
of estimates in the preparation of financial statements |
|
|
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Management believes that there are no critical accounting estimates in
these financial statements. |
|
Functional currency |
|
|
The
functional currency of the Company is the US dollar, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates.
In accordance with ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters” (ASC 830), balances denominated in or linked to foreign currency
are stated on the basis of the exchange rates prevailing at the applicable balance sheet date. For foreign currency transactions
included in the statement of operations, the exchange rates applicable on the relevant transaction dates are used. Gains or losses
arising from changes in the exchange rates used in the translation of such transactions are carried as financing income or expenses.
The functional currency of Integrity Israel is the New Israeli Shekel (“NIS”) and its financial statements are included
in consolidation, based on translation into US dollars. Accordingly, assets and liabilities were translated from NIS to US dollars
using year-end exchange rates, and expense items were translated at average exchange rates during the year. Gains or losses resulting
from translation adjustments are reflected in stockholders’ equity, under “accumulated other comprehensive income”. |
SCHEDULE
OF OFFICIAL EXCHANGE RATE
| |
2023 | | |
2022 | |
Official exchange rate of NIS 1 to US dollar | |
| 0.272 | | |
| 0.298 | |
Decrease of the official exchange rate of NIS 1 to US dollar during the year: | |
| (8.86 | )% | |
| (3.72 | )% |
|
Principles of consolidation |
|
C.
|
Principles
of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
D. |
Cash
and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
The
Company considers all short-term investments, which are highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.
Restricted
cash is invested in certificates of deposit, which are used to secure Integrity Israel’s obligations in respect of its credit
card.
For
presentation of statement of cash flows purposes, restrict cash balances are included with cash and cash equivalents, when reconciling
the reported period total amounts. |
SCHEDULE
OF RESTRICT CASH BALANCES ARE INCLUDED WITH CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| |
2023 | | |
2022 | |
| |
In thousands of US dollars | |
| |
December 31, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2023 | | |
2022 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 4,492 | | |
$ | 2,312 | |
Restricted cash | |
$ | 10 | | |
$ | 19 | |
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows | |
$ | 4,502 | | |
$ | 2,331 | |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
E. |
Property
and equipment, net |
|
1. |
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets. When an asset is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related carrying value and accumulated
depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the net difference less any amount realized from disposition is reflected
in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Rates
of depreciation: |
SCHEDULE
OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, RATES OF DEPRECIATION
| |
Years | |
Computers | |
| 3 | |
Furniture and office equipment | |
| 7-15 | |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
F. |
Impairment
of long-lived assets |
|
|
The
Group’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by
the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. To date the Group did not incur any material impairment
losses related to long lived assets. |
|
Income tax |
|
|
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Accordingly, deferred income taxes are
determined utilizing the asset and liability method based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial
accounting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities under the applicable tax law. Deferred tax balances are computed using the
enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances in respect of deferred tax assets
are provided for, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be realized. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10, which prescribes detailed guidance for the financial
statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements.
According to ASC Topic 740-10, tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. The Company’s accounting
policy is to classify interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions under income taxes, however the Company did not
recognize such items in its fiscal 2023 and 2022 financial statements and did not recognize any liability with respect to unrecognized
tax position in its balance sheet. |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
H. |
Research
and development expenses |
|
|
Research
and development expenses are charged to operations and comprehensive loss, as incurred. |
|
Royalty-bearing grants |
|
I. |
Royalty-bearing
grants |
|
|
Royalty-bearing
grants from the Israeli Innovation Authority (IIA) to fund approved research and development projects are recognized at the time
Integrity Israel is entitled to such grants, on the basis of the costs incurred and reduce research and development costs. To date,
the cumulative research and development grants received by Integrity Israel from IIA amounted to $93. See also Note 4A below. |
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
J. |
Basic
and diluted loss per share |
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the period applicable (after considering the effect of deemed dividend
related to trigger of down round protection feature) for Common Stockholders and the holders of the pre-funded warrants dividend by the
weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding and shares of Common Stock to be issued upon achievement of first performance milestone (see
Note 4A below) and upon exercise of pre-funded warrants
(see Note 5B below) during the period.
In computing, diluted loss per share, basic earnings per share are adjusted to reflect the potential dilution that could occur upon the
exercise of options or warrants issued or granted using the “treasury stock method”, if the effect of each of such financial
instruments is dilutive.
In computing diluted loss per share, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of Common Stock assumed
to be purchased from the proceeds to be received from the exercise of stock options or stock warrants.
Shares that will be issued upon exercise of all stock options and stock warrants, have been excluded from the calculation of the
diluted net loss per share for all the reported periods for which net loss was reported because the effect of the common shares issuable
as a result of the exercise or conversion of these instruments was anti-dilutive
SCHEDULE
OF ANTIDILUTIVE NET LOSS AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE
| |
2023 | | |
2022 | |
| |
In thousands of US dollars | |
| |
(except share data) | |
| |
Year ended | |
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2023 | | |
2022 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Numerator: | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | 7,097 | | |
$ | 4,435 | |
Deemed dividend related to trigger of down round protection feature (see Note 5C3 below) | |
| 855 | | |
| - | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | |
$ | 7,952 | | |
$ | 4,435 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Denominator: | |
| | | |
| | |
Shares of Common Stock used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common stock | |
| 19,313,063 | | |
| 15,474,600 | |
Shares of Common Stock to be issued upon exercise of pre-funded warrants (see
Note 5B below) | |
| 1,397,066 | | |
| - | |
Shares of Common Stock to be issued upon achievement of
first performance milestone (see Note 4B below) | |
| 50,137 | | |
| - | |
Weighted average number of Common Stock outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | |
| 20,760,266 | | |
| 15,474,600 | |
Basic and diluted net loss per common stock | |
$ | 0.38 | | |
$ | 0.29 | |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
K. |
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
The
Company measures and recognizes the compensation expense for all equity-based payments to employees based on their estimated fair
values in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Share-based payments including grants of stock
options are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as an operating expense based on the fair
value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The Company has expensed compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, applying the accelerated vesting method, over the
requisite service period or over the implicit service period when a performance condition affects the vesting, and it is considered
probable that the performance condition will be achieved. |
|
|
|
|
|
Since
January 1, 2019, share-based payments to non-employees are accounted in accordance with ASC 718. |
|
Fair value of financial instruments |
|
L. |
Fair
value of financial instruments |
|
|
ASC
Topic 825-10, “Financial Instruments” defines financial instruments and requires disclosure of the fair value of financial
instruments held by the Company. The Company considers the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and other current liabilities balances, to approximate their fair values due to
the short-term maturities of such financial instruments. ASC Topic 825-10, establishes the following fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
Level
1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair
value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. |
|
|
Level
2 - Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets but corroborated by market data. |
|
|
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. Level 3 inputs are considered as the lowest priority
under the fair value hierarchy. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
fair value of the financial instruments included in the working capital of the Company (cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable
and other current assets and liabilities) approximates their carrying value. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company did not estimate the fair value of the loans received from stockholders since their repayment schedule has not yet been determined. |
|
Concentrations of credit risk |
|
M. |
Concentrations
of credit risk |
|
|
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
and restricted cash. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are deposited with a major bank in the United States. Management
believes that such financial institutions are financially sound, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these financial
instruments. The Company does not have any significant off-balance-sheet concentration of credit risk, such as foreign exchange contracts,
option contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. |
|
Contingencies |
|
|
The
Company records accruals for loss contingencies arising from claims, litigation and other sources when it is probable that a liability
has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessments change or additional
information becomes available. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred. |
|
Warrants with down-round protection |
|
O. |
Warrants
with down-round protection |
|
|
The
Company disregard the down round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed
to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification in accordance
with the provisions of ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share” (ASU 2017-11). Based
on its evaluation, management has determined that such warrants with down-round protection
feature are eligible for equity classification.
Accordantly,
upon the occurrence of an event that triggers a down round protection feature (i.e., when the exercise price of the warrants is adjusted
downward because of the down round feature), the effect is accounted for as a deemed dividend and as a reduction of income available
to common shareholders for purposes of basic earnings per share calculation. See also Note 2K above. |
|
Modification of equity-classified contracts |
|
P. |
Modification
of equity-classified contracts |
|
|
The
modification or exchange of equity-classified contracts, such as warrants that were classified as equity before the modification
or exchange and remained eligible for equity classification after the modification, is accounted for in a similar manner to a modification
of stock-based compensation. Accordingly, the incremental fair value from the modification or exchange (the change in the fair value
of the instrument before and after the modification or exchange) is recognized as a reduction of retained earnings of increase of
accumulated deficit as a deemed dividend. Modifications or exchanges that result in a decrease in the fair value of an equity-classified
share-based payment awards are not recognized. In addition, the amount of the deemed dividend is also recognized as an adjustment
to earnings available to common shareholders for purposes of calculating earnings per share. |
|
Recently issued accounting pronouncements, not yet adopted |
|
Q. |
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements, not yet adopted |
|
1. |
In November 2023, the Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-07 “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures”, which expands annual and interim disclosure requirements for reportable segments, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. ASU 2023-07 is effective for the Company’s annual periods beginning January 1, 2024, and for interim periods beginning January 1, 2025, with early adoption permitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect that the updated standard will have on the consolidated financial statement disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
2. |
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 “Income Taxes (Topics 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures” to expand the disclosure requirements for income taxes, specifically relating to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. ASU 2023-09 is effective for the Company’s annual periods beginning January 1, 2025, with early adoption permitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect that the updated standard will have on the consolidated financial statement disclosures. |
|