XML 21 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies  
Commitments and Contingencies

Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies

 

Legal Contingencies

 

We are party to various claims, legal actions, and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of our management, the ultimate resolution of these claims, legal actions, and complaints, after consideration of amounts accrued, insurance coverage, and other arrangements, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the outcome of such matters is inherently uncertain, and estimates of our consolidated liabilities may change materially as circumstances develop.

 

In September 2010, Pemex Exploracion y Produccion (“Pemex”) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against a number of defendants, including High Sierra. Pemex alleged that High Sierra and the other defendants purchased condensate from a source that had acquired the condensate illegally from Pemex. We do not believe that High Sierra had knowledge at the time of the purchases of the condensate that such condensate was allegedly sold illegally to High Sierra and others. During March 2013, we settled this litigation for $3.1 million, which we recorded as a liability in the final accounting for our acquisition of High Sierra.

 

In May 2010, two lawsuits were filed in Kansas and Oklahoma by numerous oil and gas producers (the “Associated Producers”), asserting that they were entitled to enforce lien rights on crude oil purchased by High Sierra and other defendants. These cases were subsequently transferred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. During March 2013, we settled this litigation for an insignificant amount.

 

Customer Dispute

 

A customer of our crude oil logistics segment has disputed the transportation rate schedule we used to bill the customer for services that we provided from November 2012 through February 2013, which was the same rate schedule that Pecos used to bill the customer from April 2011 through October 2012 (prior to our acquisition of Pecos). The customer has not paid $2.2 million of the amount we charged for services subsequent to our acquisition of Pecos. In May 2013, we filed a petition in the District Court of Harris County, Texas seeking to collect these unpaid fees from the customer. Later in May 2013, the customer filed an answer and counterclaim seeking to recover $5.5 million that it paid to Pecos prior to our acquisition of Pecos. We have not recorded revenue for the $2.2 million of unpaid fees charged subsequent to our acquisition of Pecos, pending resolution of the dispute. We are not able to reliably predict the outcome of this dispute at this time, but we do not believe the outcome will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

Canadian Fuel and Sales Taxes

 

The taxing authority of a province in Canada recently completed an audit of fuel and sales tax payments, and concluded that High Sierra should have collected from customers and remitted to the taxing authority approximately $14.9 million of fuel taxes and sales taxes on certain historical sales. High Sierra had not collected and remitted fuel and sales taxes on these transactions, as High Sierra believed the transactions were exempt from these taxes. We are in the process of gathering information to support High Sierra’s position that the transactions were exempt from the taxes, which we believe could substantially reduce the amount of the tax assessed. If we are unsuccessful in demonstrating that these transactions were exempt, we would be required to remit payment to the taxing authority; however, we expect we would be able to recover these payments from the customers pursuant to the terms of our contracts with the customers. Although the outcome of this matter is not certain at this time, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We recorded in the acquisition accounting for the merger with High Sierra a liability of $14.9 million, which is the full amount assessed, and a receivable of $14.1 million, which represents the amount we would expect to recover from the customers in the event we are ultimately required to pay the taxes assessed.

 

Environmental Matters

 

Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. Although we believe our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, risks of additional costs and liabilities are inherent in our business, and there can be no assurance that significant costs will not be incurred. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from the operations, could result in substantial costs. Accordingly, we have adopted policies, practices, and procedures in the areas of pollution control, product safety, occupational health, and the handling, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials designed to prevent material environmental or other damage, and to limit the financial liability that could result from such events. However, some risk of environmental or other damage is inherent in our business.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations

 

We have recorded an asset retirement obligation liability of $1.5 million at March 31, 2013. This liability is related to the wastewater disposal assets and crude oil pipeline injection facilities for which we have contractual and regulatory obligations to perform remediation and, in some instances, dismantlement and removal activities when the assets are abandoned.

 

In addition to the obligations described above, we may be obligated to remove facilities or perform other remediation upon retirement of certain other assets. However, we do not believe the present value of these asset retirement obligations, under current laws and regulations, after taking into consideration the estimated lives of our facilities, is material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

Operating Leases

 

We have executed various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for product storage, office space, vehicles, real estate, and equipment. Future minimum lease payments under contractual commitments as of March 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

 

Year Ending March 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

$

55,065

 

2015

 

38,283

 

2016

 

31,297

 

2017

 

29,005

 

2018

 

21,520

 

Thereafter

 

36,268

 

Total

 

$

211,438

 

 

Rental expense relating to operating leases was as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):

 

Year ended March 31, 2013

 

$

51,354

 

Year ended March 31, 2012

 

5,202

 

Six months ended March 31, 2011

 

838

 

Six months ended September 30, 2010

 

676

 

 

Sales and Purchase Contracts

 

We have entered into sales and purchase contracts for natural gas liquids (including propane, butane, and ethane) and crude oil to be delivered in future periods. These contracts require that the parties physically settle the transactions with inventory. At March 31, 2013, we had the following such commitments outstanding:

 

 

 

Volume

 

Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Natural gas liquids fixed-price purchase commitments (gallons)

 

84,159

 

$

76,386

 

Natural gas liquids floating-price purchase commitments (gallons)

 

540,518

 

604,584

 

Natural gas liquids fixed-price sale commitments (gallons)

 

102,071

 

100,246

 

Natural gas liquids floating-price sale commitments (gallons)

 

262,143

 

339,757

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil fixed-price purchase commitments (barrels)

 

3,382

 

303,819

 

Crude oil fixed-price sale commitments (barrels)

 

5,642

 

504,505

 

 

We account for the contracts shown in the table above as normal purchases and normal sales. Under this accounting policy election, we do not record the contracts at fair value at each balance sheet date; instead, we record the purchase or sale at the contracted value once the delivery occurs.

 

Certain of the forward purchase and sale contracts shown in the table above were acquired in the June 2012 merger with High Sierra. We recorded these contracts at their estimated fair values at the merger date, and we are amortizing these assets and liabilities to cost of sales over the remaining terms of the contracts. At March 31, 2013, the unamortized balances included in our consolidated balance sheet were as follows (in thousands):

 

Current assets

 

$

3,124

 

Current liabilities

 

(586

)

Net assets

 

$

2,538

 

 

The following table summarizes the amortization expense (income) we have recorded, and the amortization expense (income) we expect to record, to cost of sales related to the forward purchase and sale contracts acquired in the merger with High Sierra (in thousands):

 

 

 

Natural Gas Liquids

 

Crude Oil

 

 

 

 

 

Logistics Segment

 

Logistics Segment

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2013

 

$

14,587

 

$

(1,089

)

$

13,498

 

Year ending March 31, 2014

 

2,701

 

(163

)

2,538

 

Total expense (income)

 

$

17,288

 

$

(1,252

)

$

16,036