Proskauer Rose LLP
January 18, 2011
VIA EDGAR AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-3561
Attention: H. Christopher Owings, Esq.
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Re: | GNC Acquisition Holdings Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 Initially filed on September 28, 2010 Amendment No. 1 filed on January 18, 2011 File No. 333-169618 |
||
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 Filed March 11, 2010 File No. 333-114396 |
Dear Mr. Owings:
On behalf of GNC Acquisition Holdings Inc. (the "Company") and General Nutrition Centers, Inc. ("Centers"), we submit this letter in response to comments from the staff (the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") received by letter dated October 28, 2010 relating to the above-referenced registration statement (the "Registration Statement") of the Company filed with the Commission on Form S-1 (File No. 333-169618) on September 28, 2010 and the Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") of Centers filed with the Commission on March 11, 2010.
The Company is concurrently filing via EDGAR Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement ("Amendment No.1"), marked in accordance with Rule 310 of Regulation S-T. The Company is also separately transmitting in paper copy, pursuant to Rule 418(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, supplemental information requested by the Staff. The supplemental information is not to be filed with or deemed a part of the Registration Statement, and the Company has requested that the supplemental information be returned to the undersigned promptly following completion of the Staff's review of the supplemental information.
In this letter, we have recited the comments from the Staff in italicized type and have followed each comment with the Company's response. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in Amendment No. 1. Except as otherwise specifically indicated, page references in the Company's responses to the Staff's comments correspond to the pagination of Amendment No. 1.
General
Response to Comment 1:
The Company acknowledges the Staff's comment and will include all required information as soon as possible.
Response to Comment 2:
The Company will submit all exhibits as soon as possible.
Response to Comment 3:
Prior to effectiveness of the Registration Statement, the Company will arrange to have FINRA call the Staff or provide the Staff with a letter indicating that FINRA has cleared the offering.
Response to Comment 4:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has indicated throughout the prospectus that it intends to list its shares of Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange.
Response to Comment 5:
The Company acknowledges the Staff's comment and will submit such graphics with an amendment to the Registration Statement.
Response to Comment 6:
The Company has revised the forepart of the prospectus in response to the Staff's comment. The Company has also moved the paragraph regarding the dealer prospectus delivery obligation to the outside back cover page of the prospectus.
Response to Comment 7:
The Company has revised the second paragraph to provide that the Company has not authorized anyone to provide any information or make any representations other than the information or
2
representations in the prospectus or in any free writing prospectus that the Company has authorized be delivered to the investors.
Response to Comment 8:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised certain of its assertions regarding its competitive position to provide the basis for the assertions. The Company has also clarified its assertion on pages 70 and 71 and has deleted the language identified by the Staff on page 42, and has made conforming changes throughout the prospectus.
Response to Comment 9:
The Company is providing highlighted copies of the reports cited on pages 2, 4, 42, 70, 71 and 74 under separate cover.
Response to Comment 10:
The Company has deleted the reference to free cash flow on page 3.
Response to Comment 11:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 4 and 74 to reflect that it commissioned the research conducted by the Buxton Company.
3
Response to Comment 12:
After filing the Registration Statement, the Company determined that it will not exchange its Series A preferred stock for Class A common stock prior to the offering, but, instead, intends to use proceeds from the offering to redeem all the outstanding Series A preferred stock immediately following the completion of the offering and to pay related expenses. Accordingly, the Company has removed all references to the proposed exchange and has revised its disclosure throughout the Registration Statement to reflect the proposed redemption.
Response to Comment 13:
The Company directs the Staff to the Company's response to Comment 12.
Response to Comment 14:
The Company directs the Staff to the Company's response to Comment 12.
Response to Comment 15:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on pages 4 and 5 to indicate (i) the percentage of shares of common stock that the Sponsors will hold following the offering, (ii) that under the amended and restated stockholders agreement, the Sponsors currently have, and initially upon completion of the offering the Sponsors will have, the right to nominate all directors and, in addition, that all of the current directors were, and upon completion of offering and subject to the terms of the new stockholders agreement will be, nominated by the Sponsors and (iii) that each of
4
the Sponsors will be obligated under the new stockholders agreement to vote all of the Class A common stock held by it in favor of those nominees.
Response to Comment 16:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on pages 5 and 6 and throughout the prospectus to indicate that prior to the completion of the offering, OTPP will convert a number of shares of the Company's Class B common stock into an equal number of shares of the Company's Class A common stock. The Company will include the specific number of shares of Class B common stock to be converted when known.
Response to Comment 17:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 6 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 18:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has disclosed that the shares of the Company's Class B common stock are not entitled to vote for the election or removal of the Company's directors.
Response to Comment 19:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has disclosed that the shares of Class B common stock, unlike shares of Class A common stock, are not entitled to vote for the election or removal of the Company's directors. Ares's voting rights with respect to the election and removal of directors arise from the amended and restated stockholders agreement based on its percentage ownership of Class A common stock.
5
Response to Comment 20:
The Company directs the Staff to the Company's response to Comment 12.
Response to Comment 21:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its presentation of the financial data, beginning on page 10, and its selected consolidated financial data, beginning on page 40, to reflect the same chronological order as the Company's audited and unaudited financial statements.
Response to Comment 22:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 10 in response to the Staff's comment and will add the numerical amounts to such revised disclosure when available.
Response to Comment 23:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 13 to delete the language identified by the Staff.
Response to Comment 24:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 28 in response to the Staff's comment.
6
Response to Comment 25:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 32 in response to the Staff's comment. As disclosed in the Registration Statement, the shares of Class B common stock are not entitled to vote for the election or removal of directors. As a result, the conversion of the Company's Class B common stock into the Company's Class A common stock would dilute holders of Class A common stock with respect to such matters.
Response to Comment 26:
The Company has provided the computation of net tangible book deficit below.
Net tangible book value of common stock:
in thousands
|
June 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2010 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stockholders' Equity |
$ | 785,794 | $ | 815,217 | |||
Intangibles: |
|||||||
Goodwill |
624,910 | 624,920 | |||||
Brands |
720,000 | 720,000 | |||||
Other Intangibles |
150,607 | 148,873 | |||||
Deferred taxes |
(290,389 | ) | (291,798 | ) | |||
Deferred financing fees, net |
16,287 | 15,216 | |||||
Net tangible book value |
(435,621 | ) | (401,994 | ) | |||
Shares outstanding: |
|||||||
A |
59,185 | 59,185 | |||||
B |
28,169 | 28,169 | |||||
Total Shares outstanding |
87,354 | 87,354 | |||||
Value per share |
$ | (4.99 | ) | $ | (4.60 | ) | |
If such expectations are based on known trends, then please discuss such expectations in light of such trends. We note that you cite "international franchise trends" in the second paragraph, third
7
sentence. Please describe in greater detail such "international franchise trends." See Item 303(a)(3)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
Response to Comment 27:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 42 and 43 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 28:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 43 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 29:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 46 in response to the Staff's comment. The volatility of the U.S. dollar affects only the Company's Canadian revenue, as all other revenue transactions are conducted in U.S. dollars. The revenue increase due to franchise store acquisitions and new store openings is included in the non-same store sales figure, as appropriate.
Response to Comment 30:
The Company has revised its risk factor on pages 16 and 17 and deleted the erroneous reference to specified financial ratios, including maximum total leverage ratio.
Response to Comment 31:
The Company directs the Staff to the Company's disclosure on page 56 under "Cash Used in Investing Activities", whereby the Company quantifies in the fourth paragraph under such section its anticipated capital expenditures for each of 2011 and 2012. In addition, the Company has revised its
8
disclosure to make clear that such expenditures include costs associated with growing its domestic square footage.
Response to Comment 32:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 59 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 33:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 61 and deleted the statement that the Company has not entered into any swap contracts.
Response to Comment 34:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 61 through 65 in response to the Staff's comment. In addition, the Company advises the Staff that the changes in assumptions, judgments and estimates would not have a material effect on the Company's financial condition or operating performance.
Response to Comment 35:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 66 in response to the Staff's comment.
9
Response to Comment 36:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has included on page 69 a structure chart showing the current ownership of GNC Parent LLC, GNC Corporation, General Nutrition Centers, Inc. and the Company's other significant subsidiaries. In addition, the Company has indicated which entities are holding companies and which entities are operating companies, and has provided a brief description of the type of operations conducted by such operating companies and how such operations fit into to the Company's overall business.
Response to Comment 37:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on page 76.
Response to Comment 38:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on page 77.
10
Response to Comment 39:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised the disclosure of its executive officers and directors on pages 94 through 98.
Response to Comment 40:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 98 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 41:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 94 through 98 to discuss the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that the Company's directors should serve in such capacity.
Response to Comment 42:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 100 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 43:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 100 in response to the Staff's comment.
11
Response to Comment 44:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 102 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 45:
The Company's board of directors has reviewed and considered whether the Company's compensation programs and policies create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In that regard, the Company designs its compensation programs in a balanced and diversified manner while also creating significant, yet appropriate, incentives for strong performance. The Company believes that its compensation programs reflect a balance of short-term, long-term, guaranteed and performance-based compensation in order not to encourage excessive risk-taking. The Company believes that this ensures that its Named Executive Officers focus on the health of the Company's business and the delivery of broad performance metrics that will deliver stockholder value over time and discourages excessive risk-taking by the Named Executive Officers and other employees. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that any disclosure in response to Item 402(s) of Regulation S-K is warranted.
Response to Comment 46:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 107 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 47:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 108 in response to the Staff's comment. We note that the Staff has indicated that the Company is not required to disclose the actual amount of budgeted EBITDA that the Company establishes each year.
Response to Comment 48:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 109 in response to the Staff's comment.
12
Response to Comment 49:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 109 to clarify that the Compensation Committee has historically granted options at the commencement of an executive's employment in an amount sufficient to align such executive's long-term financial interests with the Company's stockholders, and that following the completion of the offering such practice may be revised to provide for annual grants.
Response to Comment 50:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 104, 112 and 113 in response to the Staff's comment. We note that the disclosure with respect to Mr. Stubenhofer has been deleted because he is no longer a Named Executive Officer.
Response to Comment 51:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 130 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 52:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 133 in response to the Staff's comment.
The Company supplementally advises the Staff that OTPP is a non-share corporation established in 1989 by the provincial government of Ontario, Canada. OTPP is governed by a board of directors comprised of nine persons appointed by the government of Ontario and the Ontario Teachers' Federation, a professional organization representing school teachers in Ontario, Canada. OTPP's board of directors oversees a management team operating the principal business of OTTP, which is the administration of a pension plan and management of a pension fund for the benefit of active and retired Ontario teachers.
13
Response to Comment 53:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has disclosed on page 134 the information required by Item 404(a)(5) of Regulation S-K with respect to the portion of the Senior Credit Facility funded by the affiliates of Ares.
Response to Comment 54:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 136 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 55:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 137 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 56:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on page 137 to state that Mr. Ramanathan purchased shares of the Company's Class A common stock in June 2008.
Response to Comment 57:
In response to the Staff's comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on page 137 to identify the directors designated by Ares, OTPP and jointly by the Sponsors.
Response to Comment 58:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 138 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 59:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page 138 in response to the Staff's comment.
14
Response to Comment 60:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages 138 and 139 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 61:
The Company and the Sponsors intend to enter into a new stockholders agreement, which will become effective upon the completion of the offering. The Company has revised its disclosure in the prospectus to summarize the intended key provisions of the new stockholders agreement and will file the form of such agreement as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.
Response to Comment 62:
The Company has revised the disclosure on pages 147 and 148 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 63:
In response to the Staff's comments, the Company has disclosed on page 156 the material relationships between the Company and each underwriter.
Response to Comment 64:
The Company has included a solid black line between (i) the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows of the predecessor and successor and (ii) the predecessor and successor financial information in the tabular disclosure throughout the document.
15
Response to Comment 65:
Increases recorded on Schedule II represent credit adjustments posted to the inventory and accounts receivable reserves, with decreases representing debit adjustments. Below is a reconciliation of the net change as shown on Schedule II compared to non-cash adjustments on the statement of cash flows.
Inventory Reserves
|
2009 | 2008 | Successor 2007 |
|
Predecessor 2007 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provision recorded on statement of cash flow |
$ | 11,151 | $ | 14,406 | $ | 10,400 | $ | 2,247 | |||||||
Items posted directly to expense(1) |
(12,063 | ) | (13,139 | ) | (10,055 | ) | (2,523 | ) | |||||||
Foreign currency effect |
155 | (256 | ) | 199 | (9 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
(75 | ) | (484 | ) | (1,172 | ) | (24 | ) | |||||||
Net change on Schedule II |
$ | (832 | ) | $ | 527 | $ | (628 | ) | $ | (309 | ) | ||||
Accounts Receivable Reserves
|
2009 | 2008 | Successor 2007 |
|
Predecessor 2007 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provision for losses on statement of cash flow |
$ | (2,540 | ) | $ | 253 | $ | (335 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency effect |
5 | (25 | ) | 26 | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
(63 | ) | 285 | (82 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||
Net change on Schedule II |
$ | (2,598 | ) | $ | 513 | $ | (391 | ) | $ | (116 | ) | ||||
Response to Comment 66
As part of the Merger, the former stockholders and option holders were entitled to receive contingent consideration in connection with the tax benefit that would be realized by the successor company. The tax benefit was created by the net operating losses which resulted from the Merger expenses incurred by the former stockholders and option holders. Consistent with the accounting for contingent consideration and accounting for acquired tax contingencies, at the time of the Merger, an estimate was made for such additional contingent consideration to be paid to the former stockholders and option holders. The estimated deferred tax asset and corresponding liability due to the former stockholders and option holders were established in the opening balance sheet of the successor company. The initial estimate was revised as a result of a transaction cost study completed in connection with determining the Merger costs and the final settlement of an IRS audit related to that period. The change in estimate for the tax asset was recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet as was the related adjustment to the liability due to the former stockholders and option holders.
16
As the Company received the benefits of the net operating losses in periods subsequent to the Merger, a corresponding payment, on a pro rata basis, of additional consideration was made to the former stockholders and option holders for the amount of the tax benefit received. This transaction was recorded as a reduction of the tax asset when the tax refund was received and a reduction in the liability due to the former stockholders and option holders for the same amount when such stockholders and option holders were paid.
Response to Comment 67:
The Company has revised the disclosure on page F-12 to reflect that the Company uses the first-in first-out standard for cost approximation.
Response to Comment 68:
The Company does not apply the two-class method in computing basic earnings per share. For accounting purposes only, the special dividend paid on the Class B common stock is included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations. As a result, the Company does not present basic and diluted earnings per share for each class of common stock.
Response to Comment 69:
The cost and carrying value of work-in-process inventory at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 was $3.8 million and $5.1 million, respectively. Work-in-process inventory is minimal in the Company's manufacturing plant due to the immediate movement of finished goods to the Company's distribution center upon completion of production, and these goods are transferred to the Company's distribution center and reported as finished goods at the same manufacturing cost with no markup. Work-in-process inventory represents less than 0.1% of the Company's total inventory. Thus the Company has included these costs in its line item summarizing work-in-process, bulk product, and raw materials.
Response to Comment 70:
The adjustments to carrying value of inventory are recorded as a contra-asset, and included in the gross cost amount reported in the inventory footnote of the financial statements. The reference (a) included in the footnote regarding the composition of the reserves reported has been revised for clarification.
17
Response to Comment 71:
The Company has revised the disclosure on page F-24 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 72:
The Company directs the Staff to (i) the response Centers provided in its response letter dated October 14, 2009 to comment No. 9 of the Staff's comment letter dated September 29, 2009, and (ii) the response Centers provided in its response letter dated November 25, 2009 to comment No. 2 of the Staff's comment letter dated November 4, 2009.
The Company continues to consider the balance sheet amounts to be immaterial and the Company will continue to evaluate such amounts in the future. If such amounts are determined to be material, the Company will reclassify such amounts in accordance with ASC 810-10-45.
Response to Comment 73:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page F-34 to include the amount of restricted net assets and unrestricted retained earnings as of December 31, 2009, the most recent audited balance sheet date.
18
The following is a summary of the calculation of restricted net assets, used in assessing whether the disclosures required by ASC 235-10-599 1(e)(3) and Schedule I should be provided:
GNC Acquisition Holdings Inc.
Restricted Net Asset Calculation
Deember 31, 2009
|
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total net assets |
2,303,602 | |||
Less: |
||||
PP&E |
(199,581 | ) | ||
Receivables |
(94,355 | ) | ||
Cash |
(75,089 | ) | ||
Subtotal |
1,934,577 | |||
Add: |
||||
Amounts due to subs |
140,554 | |||
Total restricted net assets |
2,075,131 | |||
% Restricted net assets to total net assets |
90.1 | % |
Based on the above, the Company is required to provide Schedule I as required by Rule 5-04 of Regulation S-X. However, as all of the information required to be disclosed in Schedule I is provided in Note 26, Supplemental Guarantor Information, of the Company's audited consolidated financial statements, the Company believes that it is not necessary to disclose this information separately in Schedule I.
Response to Comment 74:
The Company has revised the disclosure on page F-45 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 75:
The Company has revised the disclosure on page F-45 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 76:
The Company has revised the disclosure on page F-47 in response to the Staff's comment.
19
Response to Comment 77:
On March 15, 2007, pursuant to the stock option agreements in place at that time, the Merger constituted a change in control of the issuer of the outstanding stock options. Upon a change in control, each of the outstanding stock options immediately became fully vested and exercisable. In accordance with the terms of the stock option plan in place at the time of the Merger, the issuer elected to cancel the outstanding stock options and pay the option holders a cash payment for the intrinsic value of such options upon consummation of the Merger. The payment to each in-the-money option holder was equal to the difference of the per share merger consideration of $13.56 and the per share exercise price of such option.
In accordance with ASC 718-20-35-7, all unrecognized compensation expenses were accelerated and recognized on March 15, 2007. No additional compensation cost was recognized as a result of the payment to each option holder, as the fair value of the option was used for the cash payment. Rather, the amount of cash paid to the option holders was recorded as a reduction of paid in capital.
Response to Comment 78:
For accounting purposes only, the special dividend paid on the Class B common stock is included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations. Although a dividend for legal and tax purposes, the accounting treatment is based on management's assessment of the nature of the payment.
Response to Comment 79:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page II-1 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 80:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page II-1 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 81:
The Company has revised its disclosure on pages II-3, II-6, II-12 and II-15 in response to the Staff's comment.
20
is not a similar provision in Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K. Please file the complete agreement, including the annexes, schedules and exhibits.
Response to Comment 82:
The Company has filed the complete Credit Agreement as an exhibit with Amendment No. 1 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 83:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page II-7 in response to the Staff's comment. Additionally, the Company confirms that the reserves are relieved through income only through sale or disposition of the items, and not based on market value recovery prior to sale or disposition.
Response to Comment 84:
The Company has revised its disclosure on page II-8 in response to the Staff's comment.
Response to Comment 85:
The signature page has been revised to reflect the signature of the Company's principal accounting officer, who is also the Company's principal financial officer.
**********
General Nutrition Centers, Inc.
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
Centers will address the comments above in its future filings to the extent applicable.
The Company acknowledges that, as a result of a typographical error, the report for Centers for the period January 1, 2007 to March 15, 2007 included an opinion with respect to financial position rather than the results of operations and cash flows. Nonetheless, the Company notes that all such statements were appropriately included within the Form 10-K and that such statements and related opinion will not appear in future filings. As a result, the Company does not believe any revision is required.
**********
21
Please direct your questions or comments regarding this response letter, Amendment No. 1 or the Form 10-K to the undersigned at (310) 284-5607. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
|
Respectfully submitted, | |
|
/s/ Philippa M. Bond |
22