10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______

Commission File Number 000-54651

Apple REIT Ten, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia	27-3218228
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
814 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia	23219
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(804) 344-8121

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer   o	Accelerated filer   o	Non-accelerated filer   x	Smaller reporting company  o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of registrant’s common shares outstanding as of November 1, 2013: 76,856,889

APPLE REIT TEN, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

				Page Number
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012		4
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012		5
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6
	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		32
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		32
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.		Legal Proceedings	33
	Item 1A.		Risk Factors	33
	Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	35
	Item 6.		Exhibits	37
Signatures				39

This Form 10-Q includes references to certain trademarks or service marks. The Courtyard® by Marriott, Fairfield Inn and Suites® by Marriott, TownePlace Suites® by Marriott, Marriott®, SpringHill Suites® by Marriott and Residence Inn® by Marriott trademarks are the property of Marriott International, Inc. or one of its affiliates. The Hampton Inn and Suites®, Homewood Suites® by Hilton, Hilton Garden Inn® and Home2 Suites® by Hilton trademarks are the property of Hilton Worldwide or one or more of its affiliates. For convenience, the applicable trademark or service mark symbol has been omitted but will be deemed to be included wherever the above referenced terms are used.

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

APPLE REIT TEN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(unaudited)
Assets
Investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation of $36,886 and $21,804, respectively	$	675,130		$	506,689
Energy investment		100,329			0
Cash and cash equivalents		0			146,530
Restricted cash-furniture, fixtures and other escrows		5,137			9,396
Due from third party managers, net		6,432			2,481
Other assets, net		7,420			2,689
Total Assets	$	794,448		$	667,785
Liabilities
Credit facility	$	35,103		$	0
Notes payable		79,972			81,186
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		9,123			7,074
Total Liabilities		124,198			88,260
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, authorized 30,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding		0			0
Series A preferred stock, no par value, authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 76,577,211 and 64,983,511 shares, respectively		0			0
Series B convertible preferred stock, no par value, authorized 480,000 shares; issued and outstanding 480,000 shares		48			48
Common stock, no par value, authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 76,577,211 and 64,983,511 shares, respectively		750,049			636,191
Distributions greater than net income		(79,847	)		(56,714	)
Total Shareholders' Equity		670,250			579,525
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	794,448		$	667,785

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

APPLE REIT TEN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues:
Room revenue	$	40,166		$	29,627		$	104,647		$	80,422
Other revenue		3,595			2,855			10,922			8,004
Total revenue		43,761			32,482			115,569			88,426
Expenses:
Operating expense		11,028			8,069			28,956			21,763
Hotel administrative expense		3,359			2,491			8,967			6,887
Sales and marketing		3,841			2,826			10,015			7,716
Utilities		1,695			1,324			4,094			3,326
Repair and maintenance		1,656			1,039			4,088			2,901
Franchise fees		1,862			1,283			4,810			3,531
Management fees		1,345			1,016			3,691			2,743
Property taxes, insurance and other		2,959			1,834			7,822			5,880
General and administrative		1,119			1,148			3,305			3,470
Acquisition related costs		2,935			607			4,904			1,541
Depreciation expense		5,748			4,094			15,082			11,582
Total expenses		37,547			25,731			95,734			71,340
Operating income		6,214			6,751			19,835			17,086
Investment income		3,533			73			4,467			134
Interest expense		(1,478	)		(1,213	)		(3,802	)		(3,596	)
Income before income taxes		8,269			5,611			20,500			13,624
Income tax expense		(87	)		(92	)		(244	)		(231	)
Net income	$	8,182		$	5,519		$	20,256		$	13,393
Basic and diluted net income per common share	$	0.11		$	0.09		$	0.29		$	0.26
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		74,887			58,701			70,308			52,066

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

APPLE REIT TEN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	NIne Months Ended
	September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	20,256		$	13,393
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		15,082			11,582
Amortization of deferred financing costs, fair value adjustments and other non-cash expenses, net		197			140
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in due from third party managers, net		(4,050	)		(3,344	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets, net		(927	)		156
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,930			1,109
Net cash provided by operating activities		32,488			23,036
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Cash paid for energy investment		(100,000	)		0
Cash paid for the acquisition of hotel properties		(177,379	)		(51,226	)
Deposits and other disbursements for potential acquisitions, net		(1,528	)		(72	)
Capital improvements		(6,543	)		(5,241	)
Decrease in capital improvement reserves		4,044			648
Investment in other assets		(1,450	)		0
Net cash used in investing activities		(282,856	)		(55,891	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds related to issuance of Units		128,409			198,532
Redemptions of Units		(14,611	)		(14,546	)
Distributions paid to common shareholders		(43,389	)		(32,011	)
Net proceeds from credit facility		35,103			0
Payments of notes payable		(1,144	)		(1,048	)
Deferred financing costs		(530	)		(132	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		103,838			150,795
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(146,530	)		117,940
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		146,530			7,079
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	0		$	125,019
Non-cash transactions:
Notes payable assumed in acquisitions	$	0		$	13,067

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

APPLE REIT TEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Apple REIT Ten, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company was formed to invest in hotels and other income-producing real estate in selected metropolitan areas in the United States. Initial capitalization occurred on August 13, 2010, when 10 Units, each Unit consisting of one common share and one Series A preferred share, were purchased by Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”) and 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares, were purchased by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company began operations on March 4, 2011, when it purchased its first hotel. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31. The Company has no foreign operations or assets and its operating structure includes only one reportable segment. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Although the Company has an interest in a variable interest entity through its energy investment and its purchase commitments, it is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have any elements of power in the decision making process of the entity and does not share in any of its benefits, and therefore does not consolidate the entities. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels located in 17 states with an aggregate of 5,452 rooms.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2013 presentation with no effect on previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, and insurance, and reserves for furniture, fixtures, and equipment replacements of up to 5% of property revenue for certain hotels, as required by certain management or mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions.

6

Offering Costs

The Company is raising capital through an on-going best-efforts offering of Units by David Lerner Associates, Inc., the managing underwriter, which receives a selling commission and a marketing expense allowance based on proceeds of the Units sold. Additionally, the Company has incurred other offering costs including legal, accounting and reporting services. These offering costs are recorded by the Company as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had sold 79.5 million Units for gross proceeds of $869.6 million and proceeds net of offering costs of $779.6 million. Offering costs included $87.0 million in selling commissions and marketing expenses and $3.1 million in other offering costs. On January 4, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the offering until January 19, 2014. As a result, the offering will continue until all Units have been sold or until January 19, 2014, whichever occurs sooner.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated after giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding for the period. There were no potential common shares with a dilutive effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 or 2012. As a result, basic and diluted outstanding shares were the same. Series B convertible preferred shares are not included in earnings per common share calculations until such time that such shares are eligible to be converted to common shares.

2.  Investment in Real Estate

The Company acquired 12 hotels during the first nine months of 2013. The following table sets forth the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each hotel. All dollar amounts are in thousands.

City	State	Brand	Manager	Date Acquired	Rooms		Gross Purchase Price
Huntsville	AL	Hampton Inn & Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		98	$	11,466
Huntsville	AL	Home2 Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		77		9,009
Fairfax	VA	Marriott	White	3/15/2013		310		34,000
Houston	TX	Residence Inn	Western	6/7/2013		120		18,000
Denton	TX	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		107		11,300
Maple Grove	MN	Hilton Garden Inn	North Central	7/26/2013		120		12,675
Oklahoma City	OK	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		90		11,500
Omaha	NE	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		139		19,775
Omaha	NE	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		123		17,625
Phoenix	AZ	Courtyard	North Central	7/26/2013		127		10,800
Phoenix	AZ	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		125		8,600
Phoenix	AZ	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		134		12,025
Total						1,570	$	176,775

The purchase price for these properties was funded by the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company also used proceeds from its on-going best-efforts offering and borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility to pay approximately $4.9 million in acquisition related costs, including $3.5 million, representing 2% of the gross purchase price for these hotels, as a brokerage commission to Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and approximately $1.4 million in other acquisition related costs, including title, legal and other related costs. These costs are included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

For the 12 hotels acquired during the first nine months of 2013, the amount of revenue and operating income (excluding acquisition related costs totaling $4.8 million) included in the Company’s consolidated income statement from the acquisition date to the period ending September 30, 2013 was approximately $14.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

7

The Company leases all of its hotels to its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (or a subsidiary thereof) under master hotel lease agreements.

 In connection with the acquisitions of the Phoenix, Arizona Hampton Inn & Suites and Homewood Suites hotels in July 2013, the Company assumed two land leases with remaining lease terms of 87 years. The leases were valued at below market rates and as a result the Company recorded in-place favorable lease assets totaling $0.6 million which are included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are being amortized over the remaining lease terms. As of September 30, 2013 the remaining minimum lease payments are approximately $16.0 million.

No goodwill was recorded in connection with any of the acquisitions.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels, located in 17 states, consisting of the following:

	Total by		Number of
Brand	Brand		Rooms
Hilton Garden Inn		10		1,563
Hampton Inn & Suites		8		988
Homewood Suites		8		870
TownePlace Suites		4		388
Courtyard		3		393
Fairfield Inn & Suites		3		310
Home2 Suites		3		304
SpringHill Suites		2		206
Marriott		1		310
Residence Inn		1		120
		43		5,452

At September 30, 2013, the Company’s investment in real estate consisted of the following (in thousands):

Land	$	65,358
Building and Improvements		597,957
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment		45,736
Franchise fees		2,965
		712,016
Less Accumulated Depreciation		(36,886	)
Investment in real estate, net	$	675,130

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding contracts for the potential purchase of seven additional hotels for a total purchase price of $155.9 million. Of these seven hotels, four are under construction and should be completed over the next two to 12 months from September 30, 2013. Closing on these four hotels is expected upon completion of construction. The three existing hotels are expected to close within the next three months. Although the Company is working towards acquiring these hotels, there are many conditions to closing that have not yet been satisfied and there can be no assurance that closings will occur under the outstanding purchase contracts. The following table summarizes the location, brand, number of rooms, refundable (if the seller does not meet its obligations under the contract) contract deposits paid, and gross purchase price for each of the contracts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.  

8

Location	Brand	Rooms		Deposits Paid		Gross Purchase Price
Operating (a)
Colorado Springs, CO	Hampton Inn & Suites		101	$	200	$	11,500	(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Courtyard		126	(c)		(c)		(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Residence Inn		124	(c)		(c)		(b)
Under Construction (d)
Dallas, TX	Homewood Suites		130		200		25,350
Fort Lauderdale, FL (e)	Residence Inn		156		3		23,088
Oklahoma City, OK	Hilton Garden Inn		155	(f)		(f)
Oklahoma City, OK	Homewood Suites		100	(f)		(f)
			892	$	1,103	$	155,938

(a)   These hotels are currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from September 30, 2013.

(b)   Purchase contracts for these hotels require the Company to assume approximately $38.8 million in mortgage debt. The loans provide for monthly payments of principal and interest on an amortized basis.

(c)   The Courtyard and Residence Inn hotels in Franklin Cool Springs, TN are located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $51 million and an initial deposit of $400,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

(d)   The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise.  Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these    hotels should close over the next 2 to 12 months from September 30, 2013.

(e)   If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.

(f)    The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and deposits of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

As there can be no assurance that all conditions to closing will be satisfied, the Company includes deposits paid for hotels under contract in other assets, net in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and in deposits and other disbursements for potential acquisitions in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. It is anticipated that the purchase price (less any debt assumed) for the outstanding contracts will be funded from the proceeds of the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under the Company’s credit facility if a closing occurs.

On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase contract for the potential acquisition of an adjoining Courtyard and TownePlace Suites hotel complex under development in Grapevine, Texas. On March 18, 2013, this contract was terminated. The gross purchase price for the hotels totaled $41.7 million. In connection with the termination of this contract, the initial deposit of $50,000 was repaid to the Company.

3.  Energy Investment

On June 7, 2013, the Company became the preferred member (the “Preferred Interest”) of Cripple Creek Energy, LLC (“CCE”) pursuant to the Limited Liability Company Agreement of CCE, dated June 6, 2013, between Eastern Colorado Holdings, LLC, as common member (“Common Member”) and Apple Ten Ventures Services, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned taxable subsidiary of the Company (“Preferred Member”). CCE is a newly formed entity that was formed solely for the purpose of acquiring, owning, managing, operating, developing, drilling and disposing of oil and gas leasehold acreage and producing and selling oil, gas and other minerals. The purchase price of the Preferred Interest was $100 million, of which $80 million was funded on June 7, 2013 and the remaining $20 million was funded on July 2, 2013. At the time of purchase, the purchase price approximated fair value. The terms of the Preferred Interest include a distribution to be paid monthly at an annual return of 10% of the Company’s “Energy Investment”, which includes the funded purchase price plus any unpaid deferred distributions, and a deferred distribution at an annual return of 4% of the Energy Investment to be paid at CCE’s option on each monthly distribution date or upon redemption of the Preferred Interest. CCE is required to redeem the Preferred Interest on June 1, 2014, but may elect to extend that date to June 1, 2015. CCE is also permitted to redeem the Preferred Interest in whole or in part at any time. The redemption price is the initial investment plus any unpaid current or deferred distributions. The Preferred Interest ranks senior to any other equity in CCE and CCE’s organizational documents limit its permitted indebtedness. The Common Member has guaranteed CCE’s payment obligations in connection with the Preferred Interest on a non-recourse basis and has pledged its common membership interest in CCE to secure the guaranty.

9

In accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification Topic on “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” the Company’s Energy Investment is classified as a held-to-maturity debt security and accounted for under the cost method. As of September 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Company’s Energy Investment was $100.3 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, total distributions earned on the Energy Investment were $3.5 million and $4.3 million, including $2.5 million and $3.1 million of monthly distributions and $1.0 million and $1.2 million of deferred distributions, which are included in investment income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

4.  Credit Facility

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank in an initial amount of $75 million. On October 3, 2013, the credit agreement was amended to increase the amount of the facility to $100 million and to allow for future increases in the amount of the facility up to $150 million, subject to certain conditions. The credit facility will be utilized for acquisitions, hotel renovations, working capital and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may make voluntary prepayments in whole or in part, at any time. The credit facility matures in July 2015; however, the Company has the right, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including covenant compliance and payment of an extension fee, to extend the maturity date to July 2016. Interest payments are due monthly and the interest rate, subject to certain exceptions, is equal to the one-month LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate for a one-month term) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.75%, depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio, as calculated under the terms of the credit agreement. The Company is also required to pay an unused facility fee of 0.25% or 0.35% on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, based on the amount of borrowings outstanding during each quarter.

On the day of closing of the credit facility, the Company borrowed $54.0 million under the credit facility, of which $53.6 million was used to fund a portion of the aggregate purchase price of eight hotels that closed on July 26, 2013 and $0.4 million was used to pay loan origination costs, which are being amortized as interest expense through the July 2015 maturity date.As of September 30, 2013, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $35.1 million and an annual interest rate of approximately 2.43%.

The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. In addition, the credit facility contains covenants restricting the level of certain investments and the following quarterly financial covenants (capitalized terms are defined in the credit agreement):

·   Minimum Net Worth shall not be less than $450 million;

·   Total Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 50%;

·   Total Secured Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 30%;

·   Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income to Fixed Charges for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two;

·   Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income attributable to Unencumbered Hotels to Implied Debt Service for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two;

·   Distributions cannot exceed $0.825 per share per year;

·   Additional Unsecured Indebtedness (other than this credit facility) shall not exceed $2.5 million; and

·   Unencumbered Leverage Ratio must be less than 45%.

The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at September 30, 2013.

10

5.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates the fair value of its debt and Energy Investment by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates consistent with the maturity of an instrument with similar credit terms and credit characteristics, which are Level 3 inputs. Market rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. At September 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Company’s Energy Investment as discussed in note 3 approximated fair value. As of September 30, 2013, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was approximately $115.1 million and $119.4 million. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $81.2 million and $85.8 million. The carrying value of the Company’s other financial instruments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

6.  Related Parties

The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (other than the transactions related to the completion of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s merger with a third party, the Company’s Energy Investment, and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.’s subcontract agreement with Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. discussed below). The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.

The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means Apple REIT Six, Inc. (“Apple Six”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc. (“Apple Seven”), Apple REIT Eight, Inc. (“Apple Eight”), Apple REIT Nine, Inc. (“Apple Nine”) and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. (“Apple Ten”). The term the “Advisors” means Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”), Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”) and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. The Advisors are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine. Another member of the Company’s Board of Directors is also on the Board of Directors of Apple Seven and Apple Eight.

On May 14, 2013, Apple Six merged with and into an entity that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or the Advisors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, dated as of November 29, 2012, upon completion of the merger, the separate corporate existence of Apple Six ceased (the “A6 Merger”). Prior to the A6 Merger, Glade M. Knight was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Six.

ASRG Agreement

The Company has a contract with ASRG, to acquire and dispose of real estate assets for the Company. A fee of 2% of the gross purchase price or gross sale price in addition to certain reimbursable expenses is paid to ASRG for these services. As of September 30, 2013, payments to ASRG for fees under the terms of this contract have totaled approximately $13.9 million since inception. Of this amount, the Company incurred $3.5 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, which is included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

11

A10A Agreement

The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A10A, pursuant to which A10A provides management services to the Company. A10A provides these management services through Apple Fund Management LLC (“AFM”), which immediately after the A6 Merger became a wholly-owned subsidiary of A9A. This transaction between A9A and Apple Six was made with no cash consideration exchanged between the entities. Prior to May 14, 2013, AFM was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apple Six. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses as described below, are payable to A10A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

On August 8, 2013, Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine announced that they have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which Apple Seven and Apple Eight will merge into Apple Nine in two merger transactions (the “Mergers”), and that as a result of this transaction, Apple Nine will become self-advised and each of Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine will terminate its advisory agreements with its advisors. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, on August 7, 2013, Apple Nine entered into a subcontract agreement, as amended, (the “Subcontract Agreement”) with A10A. Pursuant to the Subcontract Agreement, A10A will subcontract its obligations under the advisory agreement between A10A and the Company (the “Advisory Agreement”) to Apple Nine. The Subcontract Agreement provides that, from and after the effective time of the Mergers, Apple Nine will provide to the Company the advisory services contemplated under the Advisory Agreement and Apple Nine will receive the fees and expenses payable under the Advisory Agreement from the Company. The Company also signed the Subcontract Agreement to acknowledge the terms of the Subcontract Agreement. The Subcontract Agreement has no effect on the Company’s contract with A10A.

Apple REIT Entities and Advisors Cost Sharing Structure

In addition to the fees payable to ASRG and A10A, the Company reimbursed to ASRG or A10A, or paid directly to AFM or Apple Nine on behalf of ASRG or A10A, approximately $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The expenses reimbursed were approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for costs reimbursed under the contract with ASRG and approximately $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for costs reimbursed under the contract with A10A in each period. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s allocated share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM and Apple Nine at the direction of A10A.

AFM is an affiliate of each of the Advisors. Each of the Advisors provides management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple Six (prior to the A6 Merger), Apple Seven, Apple Eight, Apple Nine and Apple Ten. In connection with the A6 Merger, effective May 14, 2013, the entire membership interest of Apple Six in AFM was transferred and assigned to A9A, which then became the sole member of AFM. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple Six for liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A had no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A10A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors as described below, except Apple Six and its advisors, Apple Six Advisors, Inc. and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. (collectively “A6 Advisors”), no longer participate in the cost sharing arrangement, thereby increasing the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.

Also, in connection with the A6 Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple Nine acquired from Apple Six the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and assumed the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement. As described below, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease, including office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc. (“Office Related Costs”) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors.

12

Prior to the A6 Merger, amounts reimbursed to AFM included both compensation for personnel and Office Related Costs used by the companies. As discussed above, as a result of the A6 Merger, beginning on May 14, 2013, Office Related Costs are now allocated from Apple Nine to the other Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse Apple Nine for its share of these costs. From the period May 14, 2013 through September 30, 2013, the Company reimbursed Apple Nine approximately $0.1 million (included above in the total costs of $1.3 million related to the Company’s agreements with A10A and ASRG) for its share of Office Related Costs, which are included in general and administrative costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

All of the Office Related Costs and costs of AFM are allocated among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger. The allocation of costs is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described more fully below allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.

As part of the cost sharing arrangements, the day-to-day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger). To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The total costs for the Legal Proceedings discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities (excluding Apple Six after the A6 Merger) was approximately $2.2 million for the first nine months of 2013, of which approximately $0.2 million was allocated to the Company. Total costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $5.7 million, of which approximately $0.7 million was allocated to the Company.

Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”) Membership Interest

Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 is a 26% equity investment in Apple Air. The other current members of Apple Air are Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine. In connection with the A6 Merger, on May 13, 2013, the Company acquired its membership interest in Apple Air from Apple Six for approximately $1.45 million. The membership interest includes all rights and obligations previously held by Apple Six under Apple Air’s operating agreement. Also as part of the purchase, the Company agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple Six for any liabilities related to the membership interest. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.3 million as of September 30, 2013. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $109,000 as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Through its equity investment, the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for acquisition, asset management and renovation purposes. Additionally, prior to May 13, 2013, the Company, on occasion, used the Learjet owned by Apple Air for acquisition, asset management and renovation purposes. Total costs paid for the usage of the aircraft for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $218,000 and $133,000.

13

Energy Investment

The Company’s Preferred Interest investment in CCE was identified by an unaffiliated entity in which one of the Company’s Board of Directors is a partner. The entity earned a finder’s fee from the Common Member.

7.  Shareholders’ Equity

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company has issued 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in exchange for the payment by him of $0.10 per Series B convertible preferred share, or an aggregate of $48,000. The Series B convertible preferred shares are convertible into common shares pursuant to the formula and on the terms and conditions set forth below.

There are no dividends payable on the Series B convertible preferred shares. Holders of more than two-thirds of the Series B convertible preferred shares must approve any proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation that would adversely affect the Series B convertible preferred shares.

Upon the Company’s liquidation, the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is entitled to a priority liquidation payment before any distribution of liquidation proceeds to the holders of the common shares. However, the priority liquidation payment of the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is junior to the holders of the Series A preferred shares’ distribution rights. The holder of a Series B convertible preferred share is entitled to a liquidation payment of $11.00 per number of common shares each Series B convertible preferred share would be convertible into according to the formula described below. In the event that the liquidation of the Company’s assets results in proceeds that exceed the distribution rights of the Series A preferred shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, the remaining proceeds will be distributed between the common shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, on an as converted basis.

Each holder of outstanding Series B convertible preferred shares shall have the right to convert any of such shares into common shares of the Company upon and for 180 days following the occurrence of any of the following events:

(1) substantially all of the Company’s assets, stock or business is sold or transferred through exchange, merger, consolidation, lease, share exchange, sale or otherwise, other than a sale of assets in liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company;

(2) the termination or expiration without renewal of the advisory agreement with A10A, or if the Company ceases to use ASRG to provide property acquisition and disposition services; or

(3) the Company’s common shares are listed on any securities exchange or quotation system or in any established market.

Upon the occurrence of any conversion event, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into a number of common shares based upon the gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in the Company’s $2 billion offering according to the following table:

Gross Proceeds Raised from Sales of Units through Date of Conversion	Number of Common Shares through Conversion of One Series B Convertible Preferred Share
$800 million		9.70287
$900 million		10.90855
$    1  billion		12.11423
$ 1.1  billion		13.31991
$ 1.2  billion		14.52559
$ 1.3  billion		15.73128
$ 1.4  billion		16.93696
$ 1.5  billion		18.14264
$ 1.6  billion		19.34832
$ 1.7  billion		20.55400
$ 1.8  billion		21.75968
$ 1.9  billion		22.96537
$    2  billion		24.17104

14

In the event that after raising gross proceeds of $2 billion, the Company raises additional gross proceeds in a subsequent public offering, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into an additional number of common shares based on the additional gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in a subsequent public offering according to the following formula: (X/100 million) x 1.20568, where X is the additional gross proceeds rounded down to the nearest $100 million.

No additional consideration is due upon the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares. The conversion into common shares of the Series B convertible preferred shares will result in dilution of the shareholders’ interests and the termination of the Series A preferred shares.

Expense related to the issuance of 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Mr. Knight will be recognized at such time when the number of common shares to be issued for conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares can be reasonably estimated and the event triggering the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares to common shares occurs. The expense will be measured as the difference between the fair value of the common stock for which the Series B convertible preferred shares can be converted and the amounts paid for the Series B convertible preferred shares. Although the fair market value cannot be determined at this time, expense if the maximum offering is achieved could range from $0 to in excess of $127 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value). Based on equity raised through September 30, 2013, if a triggering event had occurred, expense would have ranged from $0 to $51.2 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value) and approximately 4.7 million common shares would have been issued.

Unit Redemption Program

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since the inception of the program through September 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 2.9 million Units in the amount of $29.7 million, including 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.6 million and 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the fourth quarter of 2012, through the April 2013 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the second quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis due to the 3% limitation discussed above. Prior to October 2012 and in July 2013, the scheduled redemption date for the third quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first nine months of 2013:

Redemption Date	Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date		Units Redeemed		Total Redemption Requests Not Redeemed at Redemption Date
Second Quarter 2012		474,466		474,466		0
Third Quarter 2012		961,236		961,236		0
Fourth Quarter 2012		617,811		46,889		570,922
First Quarter 2013		938,026		114,200		823,826
Second Quarter 2013		1,063,625		637,779		425,846
Third Quarter 2013		677,855		677,855		0

15

Distributions

The Company’s annual distribution rate as of September 30, 2013 was $0.825 per common share, payable monthly. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.20625 per common share for a total of $15.4 million and $12.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.61875 per common share for a total of $43.4 million and $32.0 million.

8.  Pro Forma Information

The following unaudited pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented as if the acquisitions of the Company’s hotels acquired after December 31, 2011 had occurred on the latter of January 1, 2012 or the opening date of the hotel (six of the Company’s hotels opened after January 1, 2012). The pro forma information does not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations would actually have been if such transactions, in fact, had occurred on these applicable dates, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. Amounts are in thousands, except per share data.

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Total revenues	$	45,630	$	43,313	$	136,617	$	123,537
Net income		11,351		7,299		28,986		15,244
Net income per share - basic and diluted	$	0.15	$	0.11	$	0.40	$	0.25

The pro forma information reflects adjustments for actual revenues and expenses of the 17 hotels acquired during 2012 and 2013 for the respective period owned prior to acquisition by the Company. Net income has been adjusted as follows: (1) interest income and expense has been adjusted to reflect the reduction in cash and cash equivalents required to fund the acquisitions; (2) interest expense related to prior owner’s debt which was not assumed has been eliminated; (3) depreciation has been adjusted based on the Company’s basis in the hotels; and (4) transaction costs have been adjusted for the acquisition of existing businesses.

9.  Legal Proceedings

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

16

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees filed their Briefs on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

10.  Subsequent Events

In October 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $5.3 million, or $0.06875 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.

In October 2013, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 0.6 million Units in the amount of $6.2 million, representing 100% of the requested Unit redemptions.

During October 2013, the Company closed on the issuance of approximately 0.9 million Units through its on-going best-efforts offering, representing gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $9.8 million and proceeds net of selling and marketing costs of approximately $8.8 million.

17

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by use of terms such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “goal,” “plan,” “should,” “will,” “predict,” “potential” and similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the ability of the Company to implement its acquisition strategy and operating strategy; the Company’s ability to manage planned growth; changes in economic cycles; financing risks; the outcome of current and future litigation, regulatory proceedings or inquiries; changes in laws or regulations or interpretations of current laws and regulations that impact the Company’s business, assets or classification as a real estate investment trust; competition within the hotel and real estate industry; and the ability of the Company to realize its anticipated return on its energy investment as well as the ability of the underlying business to implement its operating strategy, which is subject to numerous government regulations and other risks inherent in the oil and gas industry. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore there can be no assurance that such statements included in this quarterly report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved. In addition, the Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Readers should carefully review the Company’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward-looking statement that the Company makes speaks only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.

Overview

Apple REIT Ten, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company, which has a limited operating history, was formed to invest in hotels and other income-producing real estate in selected metropolitan areas in the United States. The Company was initially capitalized on August 13, 2010, with its first investor closing on January 27, 2011. The on-going best-efforts offering will continue until all Units are sold or January 19, 2014. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels (12 acquired during the first nine months of 2013, five acquired during 2012 and 26 acquired during 2011). Accordingly, the results of operations include only results from the date of ownership of the properties.

Hotel Operations

Although hotel performance can be influenced by many factors including local competition, local and general economic conditions in the United States and the performance of individual managers assigned to each hotel, performance of the hotels as compared to other hotels within their respective local markets, in general, has met the Company’s expectations for the period owned. As the United States economy continues to improve, the hotel industry and the Company are experiencing improvements in both revenues and operating income for comparable hotels as compared to the prior year. Although there is no way to predict future general economic conditions, and there are several key factors that may continue to negatively affect the economic recovery in the United States and add to general market uncertainty, including but not limited to, the continued high levels of unemployment, the slow pace of the economic recovery in the United States and the uncertainty surrounding the fiscal policy of the United States (including the “sequester,” tax increases and potential government spending cuts), the Company and industry are forecasting a mid-single digit percentage increase in revenue for 2013 as compared to 2012 for comparable hotels with the trend expected to continue in 2014.

18

In evaluating financial condition and operating performance, the most important indicators on which the Company focuses are revenue measurements, such as average occupancy, average daily rate (“ADR”), revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) and market yield which compares an individual hotel’s results to others in its local market, and expenses, such as hotel operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and other expenses as described below.

The following is a summary of the results from operations of the 43 hotels owned as of September 30, 2013 for their respective periods of ownership by the Company:

	Three Months Ended September 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands, except statistical data)	2013			Percent of Revenue			2012			Percent of Revenue			2013			Percent of Revenue			2012			Percent of Revenue
Total revenue	$	43,761			100	%	$	32,482			100	%	$	115,569			100	%	$	88,426			100	%
Hotel operating expenses		24,786			57	%		18,048			56	%		64,621			56	%		48,867			55	%
Property taxes, insurance and other expense		2,959			7	%		1,834			6	%		7,822			7	%		5,880			7	%
General and administrative expense		1,119			3	%		1,148			4	%		3,305			3	%		3,470			4	%
Acquisition related costs		2,935						607						4,904						1,541
Depreciation		5,748						4,094						15,082						11,582
Investment income		3,533						73						4,467						134
Interest expense		1,478						1,213						3,802						3,596
Income tax expense		87						92						244						231
Number of hotels		43						31						43						31
Average Market Yield(1)		127						126						126						126
ADR	$	114					$	115					$	116					$	114
Occupancy		74	%					73	%					73	%					71	%
RevPAR	$	84					$	84					$	85					$	81
Total rooms sold(2)		352,807						258,251						905,011						702,544
Total rooms available(3)		477,730						351,749						1,236,348						987,781

(1)  Calculated from data provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.®  Excludes hotels under renovation or opened less than two years during the applicable periods.

(2)  Represents the number of room nights sold during the period.

(3)  Represents the number of rooms owned by the Company multiplied by the number of nights in the period.

Legal Proceedings

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

19

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees filed their Briefs on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

Hotels Owned

The Company commenced operations in March 2011 upon the purchase of its first hotel property. The following table summarizes the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each of the 43 hotels the Company owned as of September 30, 2013. All dollar amounts are in thousands.

City	State	Brand	Manager	Date Acquired	Rooms		Gross Purchase Price
Denver	CO	Hilton Garden Inn	Stonebridge	3/4/2011		221	$	58,500
Winston-Salem	NC	Hampton Inn & Suites	McKibbon	3/15/2011		94		11,000
Charlotte	NC	Fairfield Inn & Suites	Newport	3/25/2011		94		10,000
Columbia	SC	TownePlace Suites	Newport	3/25/2011		91		10,500
Mobile	AL	Hampton Inn & Suites	McKibbon	6/2/2011		101		13,000
Gainesville	FL	Hilton Garden Inn	McKibbon	6/2/2011		104		12,500
Pensacola	FL	TownePlace Suites	McKibbon	6/2/2011		98		11,500
Knoxville	TN	SpringHill Suites	McKibbon	6/2/2011		103		14,500
Richmond	VA	SpringHill Suites	McKibbon	6/2/2011		103		11,000
Cedar Rapids	IA	Hampton Inn & Suites	Schulte	6/8/2011		103		13,000
Cedar Rapids	IA	Homewood Suites	Schulte	6/8/2011		95		13,000
Hoffman Estates	IL	Hilton Garden Inn	Schulte	6/10/2011		184		10,000
Davenport	IA	Hampton Inn & Suites	Schulte	7/19/2011		103		13,000
Knoxville	TN	Homewood Suites	McKibbon	7/19/2011		103		15,000
Knoxville	TN	TownePlace Suites	McKibbon	8/9/2011		98		9,000
Mason	OH	Hilton Garden Inn	Schulte	9/1/2011		110		14,825
Omaha	NE	Hilton Garden Inn	White	9/1/2011		178		30,018
Des Plaines	IL	Hilton Garden Inn	Raymond	9/20/2011		251		38,000
Merillville	IN	Hilton Garden Inn	Schulte	9/30/2011		124		14,825
Austin/Round Rock	TX	Homewood Suites	Vista	10/3/2011		115		15,500
Scottsdale	AZ	Hilton Garden Inn	White	10/3/2011		122		16,300
South Bend	IN	Fairfield Inn & Suites	White	11/1/2011		119		17,500
Charleston	SC	Home2 Suites	LBA	11/10/2011		122		13,908
Oceanside	CA	Courtyard	Marriott	11/28/2011		142		30,500
Skokie	IL	Hampton Inn & Suites	Raymond	12/19/2011		225		32,000
Tallahassee	FL	Fairfield Inn & Suites	LBA	12/30/2011		97		9,355
Gainesville	FL	Homewood Suites	McKibbon	1/27/2012		103		14,550
Nashville	TN	TownePlace Suites	LBA	1/31/2012		101		9,848
Jacksonville	NC	Home2 Suites	LBA	5/4/2012		105		12,000
Boca Raton	FL	Hilton Garden Inn	White	7/16/2012		149		10,900
Houston	TX	Courtyard	LBA	7/17/2012		124		14,632
Huntsville	AL	Hampton Inn & Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		98		11,466
Huntsville	AL	Home2 Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		77		9,009
Fairfax	VA	Marriott	White	3/15/2013		310		34,000
Houston	TX	Residence Inn	Western	6/7/2013		120		18,000
Denton	TX	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		107		11,300
Maple Grove	MN	Hilton Garden Inn	North Central	7/26/2013		120		12,675
Oklahoma City	OK	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		90		11,500
Omaha	NE	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		139		19,775
Omaha	NE	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		123		17,625
Phoenix	AZ	Courtyard	North Central	7/26/2013		127		10,800
Phoenix	AZ	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		125		8,600
Phoenix	AZ	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		134		12,025
Total						5,452	$	696,936

20

The purchase price for these properties, net of debt assumed was funded by the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company assumed approximately $82.5 million of debt secured by six of its hotel properties.

The Company also used the proceeds of its on-going best-efforts offering and borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility to pay approximately $13.9 million, representing 2% of the gross purchase price for these hotels, as a commission to Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company leases all of its hotels to its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (or a subsidiary thereof) under master hotel lease agreements. No goodwill was recorded in connection with any of the acquisitions.

Energy Investment

On June 7, 2013, the Company became the preferred member (the “Preferred Interest”) of Cripple Creek Energy, LLC (“CCE”) pursuant to the Limited Liability Company Agreement of CCE, dated June 6, 2013, between Eastern Colorado Holdings, LLC, as common member (“Common Member”) and Apple Ten Ventures Services, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned taxable subsidiary of the Company (“Preferred Member”). CCE is a newly formed entity that was formed solely for the purpose of acquiring, owning, managing, operating, developing, drilling and disposing of oil and gas leasehold acreage and producing and selling oil, gas and other minerals. The purchase price of the Preferred Interest was $100 million, of which $80 million was funded on June 7, 2013 and the remaining $20 million was funded on July 2, 2013. At the time of purchase, the purchase price approximated fair value. The terms of the Preferred Interest include a distribution to be paid monthly at an annual return of 10% of the Company’s “Energy Investment”, which includes the funded purchase price plus any unpaid deferred distributions, and a deferred distribution at an annual return of 4% of the Energy Investment to be paid at CCE’s option on each monthly distribution date or upon redemption of the Preferred Interest. CCE is required to redeem the Preferred Interest on June 1, 2014, but may elect to extend that date to June 1, 2015. CCE is also permitted to redeem the Preferred Interest in whole or in part at any time. The redemption price is the initial investment plus any unpaid current or deferred distributions. The Preferred Interest ranks senior to any other equity in CCE and CCE’s organizational documents limit its permitted indebtedness. The Common Member has guaranteed CCE’s payment obligations in connection with the Preferred Interest on a non-recourse basis and has pledged its common membership interest in CCE to secure the guaranty.

In accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification Topic on “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” the Company’s Energy Investment is classified as a held-to-maturity debt security and accounted for under the cost method. As of September 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Company’s Energy Investment was $100.3 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, total distributions earned on the Energy Investment were $3.5 million and $4.3 million, including $2.5 million and $3.1 million of monthly distributions and $1.0 million and $1.2 million of deferred distributions, which are included in investment income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Results of Operations

During the period from the Company’s initial capitalization on August 13, 2010 to March 3, 2011, the Company owned no properties, had no revenue, exclusive of interest income and was primarily engaged in capital formation activities. The Company began operations on March 4, 2011 when it purchased its first hotel. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels (of which 12 were acquired during 2013) with 5,452 rooms as compared to 31 hotels, with a total of 3,882 rooms as of September 30, 2012. As a result, a comparison of 2013 operating results to prior year results is not meaningful.

Hotel performance is impacted by many factors including the economic conditions in the United States as well as each locality. Although hampered by government spending uncertainty, economic indicators in the United States have shown evidence of a sustainable recovery, which continues to overall positively impact the lodging industry. As a result, the Company’s revenue and operating income for comparable hotels has improved in the first nine months of 2013 as compared to the same period of 2012 and the Company expects continued improvement in revenue and operating income in 2013 as compared to 2012 and into 2014.

21

Revenues

The Company’s principal source of revenue is hotel revenue, consisting of room and other related revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had total revenue of approximately $43.8 million and $32.5 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had total revenue of $115.6 million and $88.4 million, respectively. This revenue reflects hotel operations for the 43 hotels acquired through September 30, 2013 for their respective periods of ownership by the Company. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 74% and 73%, ADR of $114 and $115 and RevPAR of $84 for both periods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the hotels achieved combined average occupancy of approximately 73% and 71%, ADR of $116 and $114 and RevPAR of $85 and $81. ADR is calculated as room revenue divided by the number of rooms sold, and RevPAR is calculated as occupancy multiplied by ADR.

The Company’s hotels in general have shown results consistent with industry and brand averages for the period of ownership. Although certain markets have been negatively impacted by reduced government spending, with overall demand and room rate improvement of comparable hotels, the Company and industry are forecasting a mid-single digit percentage increase in revenue for 2013 as compared to 2012 for comparable hotels with the trend expected to continue in 2014. The Company’s hotels continue to be leaders in their respective markets. The Company’s average Market Yield for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was 126 in both periods. The Market Yield is a measure of each hotel’s RevPAR compared to the average in the market, with 100 being the average (the index excludes hotels under renovation or open less than two years) and is provided by Smith Travel Research, Inc.®, an independent company that tracks historical hotel performance in most markets throughout the world. The Company will continue to pursue market opportunities to improve revenue.

In addition, nine of the hotels owned as of September 30, 2013 have been opened within the past two years. Generally, newly constructed hotels require 12 to 24 months to establish themselves in their respective markets. Therefore, revenue is below market levels for this period of time.

Expenses

Hotel operating expenses relate to the 43 hotels acquired through September 30, 2013 for their respective periods owned and consist of direct room expenses, hotel administrative expense, sales and marketing expense, utilities expense, repair and maintenance expense, franchise fees and management fees. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, hotel operating expenses totaled approximately $24.8 million or 57% of total revenue and $18.0 million, or 56% of total revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, hotel operating expenses totaled approximately $64.6 million, or 56% of total revenue, and $48.9 million, or 55% of total revenue. As noted above, nine of the hotels acquired by the Company opened within the past two years. As a result, although operating expenses will increase with a full year of ownership for all properties, it is anticipated that operating expenses as a percentage of revenue for the properties owned at September 30, 2013 will decline as new properties establish themselves within their respective markets. The benefit of newly opened hotels reducing expenses as a percentage of revenue as they become established was offset by a slight increase in labor benefit costs during the first nine months of 2013 as compared to the first nine months of 2012 for comparable hotels. These labor benefit costs are likely to continue to grow at increased rates until the associated new government regulations surrounding healthcare are developed and implemented. Although operating expenses will increase as revenue increases, the Company will continue to work with its management companies to reduce costs as a percentage of revenue where possible while maintaining quality and service levels at each property.

Property taxes, insurance, and other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $3.0 million, or 7% of total revenue, and $1.8 million, or 6% of total revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, property taxes, insurance, and other expense totaled $7.8 million and $5.9 million, or 7% of total revenue. As discussed above, with the addition of nine newly opened hotels, property taxes, insurance and other expenses as a percentage of revenue is anticipated to decline as the properties become established in their respective markets. However, for comparable hotels, taxes have increased for certain properties due to the reassessment of property values by localities resulting from the improved economy.

22

General and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $1.1 million in each period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, general and administrative expense totaled $3.3 million and $3.5 million. The principal components of general and administrative expense are advisory fees and reimbursable expenses, legal fees, accounting fees and reporting expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively in legal costs related to the legal matters discussed herein and continued costs related to responding to requests from the staff of the SEC. The SEC staff has been conducting a non-public investigation, which is focused principally on the adequacy of certain disclosures and the review of certain transactions involving Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc., and Apple REIT Nine, Inc. Although the Company believes it is currently not the focus of the SEC investigation, the Company’s officers are the same officers as the other Apple REIT Entities. The other Apple REIT Entities are engaging in a dialogue with the SEC staff concerning the issues noted and the roles of certain officers. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this investigation as to the other Apple REIT Entities or its officers, nor can it predict the timing associated with any such conclusion or resolution. As discussed below under Related Parties, the Company shares legal counsel with the other Apple REIT Entities. Total costs for these legal matters for all of the Apple REIT Entities were approximately $2.2 million and $5.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company anticipates it will continue to incur costs associated with these matters.

Acquisition related costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $2.9 million and $0.6 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, acquisition related costs were $4.9 million and $1.5 million. The Company has expensed as incurred all transaction costs associated with the acquisitions of existing businesses, including title, legal, accounting and other related costs, as well as the brokerage commission paid to ASRG. The increase is due to the acquisition of 12 hotels with a total purchase price of $176.8 million in the first nine months of 2013 compared to five hotels with a total purchase price of $61.9 million in the first nine months of 2012.

Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $5.7 million and $4.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, depreciation expense was $15.1 million and $11.6 million. Depreciation expense represents expense of the Company’s 43 hotel buildings and related improvements, and associated personal property (furniture, fixtures and equipment), for their respective periods owned.

Investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $3.5 million and $0.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, investment income totaled $4.5 million and $0.1 million. Investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $3.5 million and $4.3 million of total distributions earned on the Company’s Energy Investment. Investment income also includes earnings on excess cash invested in short term money market instruments.

Interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $1.5 million and $1.2 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, interest expense totaled $3.8 million and $3.6 million and, in both periods, is net of approximately $0.2 million of interest capitalized associated with renovation projects. Interest expense primarily arose from debt assumed with the acquisition of six of the Company’s hotels (one loan assumption in 2012 and five loan assumptions in 2011) and, beginning in July 2013, borrowings on the Company’s $100 million credit facility.

Related Parties

The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (other than the transactions related to the completion of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s merger with a third party, the Company’s Energy Investment, and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.’s subcontract agreement with Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. discussed below). The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.

23

The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means Apple REIT Six, Inc. (“Apple Six”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc. (“Apple Seven”), Apple REIT Eight, Inc. (“Apple Eight”), Apple REIT Nine, Inc. (“Apple Nine”) and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. (“Apple Ten”). The term the “Advisors” means Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”), Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”) and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. The Advisors are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine. Another member of the Company’s Board of Directors is also on the Board of Directors of Apple Seven and Apple Eight.

On May 14, 2013, Apple Six merged with and into an entity that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or the Advisors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, dated as of November 29, 2012, upon completion of the merger, the separate corporate existence of Apple Six ceased (the “A6 Merger”). Prior to the A6 Merger, Glade M. Knight was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Six.

ASRG Agreement

The Company has a contract with ASRG, to acquire and dispose of real estate assets for the Company. A fee of 2% of the gross purchase price or gross sale price in addition to certain reimbursable expenses is paid to ASRG for these services. As of September 30, 2013, payments to ASRG for fees under the terms of this contract have totaled approximately $13.9 million since inception. Of this amount, the Company incurred $3.5 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, which is included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

A10A Agreement

The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A10A, pursuant to which A10A provides management services to the Company. A10A provides these management services through Apple Fund Management LLC (“AFM”), which immediately after the A6 Merger became a wholly-owned subsidiary of A9A. This transaction between A9A and Apple Six was made with no cash consideration exchanged between the entities. Prior to May 14, 2013, AFM was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apple Six. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses as described below, are payable to A10A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

On August 8, 2013, Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine announced that they have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which Apple Seven and Apple Eight will merge into Apple Nine in two merger transactions (the “Mergers”), and that as a result of this transaction, Apple Nine will become self-advised and each of Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine will terminate its advisory agreements with its advisors. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, on August 7, 2013, Apple Nine entered into a subcontract agreement, as amended, (the “Subcontract Agreement”) with A10A. Pursuant to the Subcontract Agreement, A10A will subcontract its obligations under the advisory agreement between A10A and the Company (the “Advisory Agreement”) to Apple Nine. The Subcontract Agreement provides that, from and after the effective time of the Mergers, Apple Nine will provide to the Company the advisory services contemplated under the Advisory Agreement and Apple Nine will receive the fees and expenses payable under the Advisory Agreement from the Company. The Company also signed the Subcontract Agreement to acknowledge the terms of the Subcontract Agreement. The Subcontract Agreement has no effect on the Company’s contract with A10A.

Apple REIT Entities and Advisors Cost Sharing Structure

In addition to the fees payable to ASRG and A10A, the Company reimbursed to ASRG or A10A, or paid directly to AFM or Apple Nine on behalf of ASRG or A10A, approximately $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The expenses reimbursed were approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for costs reimbursed under the contract with ASRG and approximately $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for costs reimbursed under the contract with A10A in each period. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s allocated share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM and Apple Nine at the direction of A10A.

24

AFM is an affiliate of each of the Advisors. Each of the Advisors provides management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple Six (prior to the A6 Merger), Apple Seven, Apple Eight, Apple Nine and Apple Ten. In connection with the A6 Merger, effective May 14, 2013, the entire membership interest of Apple Six in AFM was transferred and assigned to A9A, which then became the sole member of AFM. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple Six for liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A had no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A10A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors as described below, except Apple Six and its advisors, Apple Six Advisors, Inc. and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. (collectively “A6 Advisors”), no longer participate in the cost sharing arrangement, thereby increasing the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.

Also, in connection with the A6 Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple Nine acquired from Apple Six the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and assumed the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement. As described below, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease, including office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc. (“Office Related Costs”) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors.

Prior to the A6 Merger, amounts reimbursed to AFM included both compensation for personnel and Office Related Costs used by the companies. As discussed above, as a result of the A6 Merger, beginning on May 14, 2013, Office Related Costs are now allocated from Apple Nine to the other Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse Apple Nine for its share of these costs. From the period May 14, 2013 through September 30, 2013, the Company reimbursed Apple Nine approximately $0.1 million (included above in the total costs of $1.3 million related to the Company’s agreements with A10A and ASRG) for its share of Office Related Costs, which are included in general and administrative costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

All of the Office Related Costs and costs of AFM are allocated among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger. The allocation of costs is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described more fully below allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.

As part of the cost sharing arrangements, the day-to-day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger). To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The total costs for the Legal Proceedings discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities (excluding Apple Six after the A6 Merger) was approximately $2.2 million for the first nine months of 2013, of which approximately $0.2 million was allocated to the Company. Total costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $5.7 million, of which approximately $0.7 million was allocated to the Company.

25

Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”) Membership Interest

Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 is a 26% equity investment in Apple Air. The other current members of Apple Air are Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine. In connection with the A6 Merger, on May 13, 2013, the Company acquired its membership interest in Apple Air from Apple Six for approximately $1.45 million. The membership interest includes all rights and obligations previously held by Apple Six under Apple Air’s operating agreement. Also as part of the purchase, the Company agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple Six for any liabilities related to the membership interest. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.3 million as of September 30, 2013. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $109,000 as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Through its equity investment, the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for acquisition, asset management and renovation purposes. Additionally, prior to May 13, 2013, the Company, on occasion, used the Learjet owned by Apple Air for acquisition, asset management and renovation purposes. Total costs paid for the usage of the aircraft for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $218,000 and $133,000.

Energy Investment

The Company’s Preferred Interest investment in CCE was identified by an unaffiliated entity in which one of the Company’s Board of Directors is a partner. The entity earned a finder’s fee from the Common Member.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company has issued 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in exchange for the payment by him of $0.10 per Series B convertible preferred share, or an aggregate of $48,000. The Series B convertible preferred shares are convertible into common shares pursuant to the formula and on the terms and conditions set forth below.

There are no dividends payable on the Series B convertible preferred shares. Holders of more than two-thirds of the Series B convertible preferred shares must approve any proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation that would adversely affect the Series B convertible preferred shares.

Upon the Company’s liquidation, the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is entitled to a priority liquidation payment before any distribution of liquidation proceeds to the holders of the common shares. However, the priority liquidation payment of the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is junior to the holders of the Series A preferred shares’ distribution rights. The holder of a Series B convertible preferred share is entitled to a liquidation payment of $11.00 per number of common shares each Series B convertible preferred share would be convertible into according to the formula described below. In the event that the liquidation of the Company’s assets results in proceeds that exceed the distribution rights of the Series A preferred shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, the remaining proceeds will be distributed between the common shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, on an as converted basis.

Each holder of outstanding Series B convertible preferred shares shall have the right to convert any of such shares into common shares of the Company upon and for 180 days following the occurrence of any of the following events:

(1) substantially all of the Company’s assets, stock or business is sold or transferred through exchange, merger, consolidation, lease, share exchange, sale or otherwise, other than a sale of assets in liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company;

(2) the termination or expiration without renewal of the advisory agreement with A10A, or if the Company ceases to use ASRG to provide property acquisition and disposition services; or

(3) the Company’s common shares are listed on any securities exchange or quotation system or in any established market.

26

Upon the occurrence of any conversion event, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into a number of common shares based upon the gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in the Company’s $2 billion offering according to the following table:

Gross Proceeds Raised from Sales of Units through Date of Conversion	Number of Common Shares through Conversion of One Series B Convertible Preferred Share
$800 million		9.70287
$900 million		10.90855
$    1  billion		12.11423
$ 1.1  billion		13.31991
$ 1.2  billion		14.52559
$ 1.3  billion		15.73128
$ 1.4  billion		16.93696
$ 1.5  billion		18.14264
$ 1.6  billion		19.34832
$ 1.7  billion		20.55400
$ 1.8  billion		21.75968
$ 1.9  billion		22.96537
$    2  billion		24.17104

In the event that after raising gross proceeds of $2 billion, the Company raises additional gross proceeds in a subsequent public offering, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into an additional number of common shares based on the additional gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in a subsequent public offering according to the following formula: (X/100 million) x 1.20568, where X is the additional gross proceeds rounded down to the nearest $100 million.

No additional consideration is due upon the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares. The conversion into common shares of the Series B convertible preferred shares will result in dilution of the shareholders’ interests and the termination of the Series A preferred shares.

Expense related to the issuance of 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Mr. Knight will be recognized at such time when the number of common shares to be issued for conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares can be reasonably estimated and the event triggering the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares to common shares occurs. The expense will be measured as the difference between the fair value of the common stock for which the Series B convertible preferred shares can be converted and the amounts paid for the Series B convertible preferred shares. Although the fair market value cannot be determined at this time, expense if the maximum offering is achieved could range from $0 to in excess of $127 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value). Based on equity raised through September 30, 2013, if a triggering event had occurred, expense would have ranged from $0 to $51.2 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value) and approximately 4.7 million common shares would have been issued.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Resources

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are the proceeds of its on-going best-efforts offering, the cash flow generated from properties the Company has or will acquire, distributions received on its Energy Investment and its $100 million revolving credit facility. In addition, the Company may borrow additional funds, subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors.

27

The Company is raising capital through a best-efforts offering of Units (each Unit consists of one common share and one Series A preferred share) by David Lerner Associates, Inc., the managing dealer, which receives selling commissions and a marketing expense allowance based on proceeds of the Units sold. The minimum offering of 9,523,810 Units at $10.50 per Unit was sold as of January 27, 2011, with proceeds net of commissions and marketing expenses totaling $90 million. Subsequent to the minimum offering and through September 30, 2013, an additional 70.0 million Units, at $11 per Unit, were sold, with the Company receiving proceeds, net of commissions, marketing expenses and other offering costs of approximately $689.6 million. The Company is continuing its offering at $11.00 per Unit. On January 4, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the offering until January 19, 2014. As a result, the offering will continue until all Units have been sold or until January 19, 2014, whichever occurs sooner. As of September 30, 2013, 102,761,455 Units remained unsold.

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank in an initial amount of $75 million. On October 3, 2013, the credit agreement was amended to increase the amount of the facility to $100 million and to allow for future increases in the amount of the facility up to $150 million, subject to certain conditions. The credit facility will be utilized for acquisitions, hotel renovations, working capital and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may make voluntary prepayments in whole or in part, at any time. The credit facility matures in July 2015; however, the Company has the right, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including covenant compliance and payment of an extension fee, to extend the maturity date to July 2016. Interest payments are due monthly and the interest rate, subject to certain exceptions, is equal to the one-month LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate for a one-month term) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.75%, depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio, as calculated under the terms of the credit agreement. The Company is also required to pay an unused facility fee of 0.25% or 0.35% on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, based on the amount of borrowings outstanding during each quarter.

On the day of closing of the credit facility, the Company borrowed $54.0 million under the credit facility, of which $53.6 million was used to fund a portion of the aggregate purchase price of eight hotels that closed on July 26, 2013 and $0.4 million was used to pay loan origination costs. As of September 30, 2013, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $35.1 million and an annual interest rate of approximately 2.43%.

The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. In addition, the credit facility contains covenants restricting the level of certain investments and the following quarterly financial covenants (capitalized terms are defined in the credit agreement):

·   Minimum Net Worth shall not be less than $450 million;

·   Total Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 50%;

·   Total Secured Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 30%;

·   Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income to Fixed Charges for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two;

·   Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income attributable to Unencumbered Hotels to Implied Debt Service for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two;

·   Distributions cannot exceed $0.825 per share per year;

·   Additional Unsecured Indebtedness (other than this credit facility) shall not exceed $2.5 million; and

·   Unencumbered Leverage Ratio must be less than 45%.

The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at September 30, 2013.

Capital Uses

The Company anticipates that cash flow from operations, distributions from the Company’s Energy Investment, availability under its $100 million revolving credit facility and available additional financing will be adequate to meet its anticipated liquidity requirements, including debt service, capital improvements, required distributions to shareholders to maintain its REIT status and planned Unit redemptions. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering, assumed secured debt, borrowings under its credit facility and available additional financing to purchase the hotels under contract if a closing occurs.

28

To maintain its REIT status the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary income.  Distributions during the first nine months of 2013 totaled approximately $43.4 million and were paid at a monthly rate of $0.06875 per common share. For the same period, the Company’s cash generated from operations was approximately $32.5 million. Due to the inherent delay between raising capital and investing that same capital in income producing real estate, the Company has had significant amounts of cash earning interest at short term money market rates. As a result, a portion of distributions paid through September 30, 2013 have been funded from proceeds from the on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under its credit facility, and are expected to be treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes.

In February 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors established a policy for an annualized distribution rate of $0.825 per common share, payable in monthly distributions. The Company intends to continue paying distributions on a monthly basis, consistent with the annualized distribution rate established by its Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, may amend or establish a new annualized distribution rate and may change the timing of when distributions are paid. The Company’s objective in setting a distribution rate is to project a rate that will provide consistency over the life of the Company taking into account acquisitions and capital improvements, ramp up of new properties and varying economic cycles. To meet this objective, the Company may require the use of debt or offering proceeds in addition to cash from operations. Since a portion of distributions to date have been funded with proceeds from the offering of Units and borrowings under its credit facility, the Company’s ability to maintain its current intended rate of distribution will be based on its ability to generate cash from operations at this level, as well as the Company’s ability to utilize currently available financing, or the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing. Since there can be no assurance that the properties already acquired or that will be acquired will provide income at this level, or that the Company will be able to obtain additional financing, there can be no assurance as to the classification or duration of distributions at the current rate. Proceeds of the offering which are distributed are not available for investment in properties.

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since the inception of the program through September 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 2.9 million Units in the amount of $29.7 million, including 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.6 million and 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the fourth quarter of 2012, through the April 2013 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the second quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis due to the 3% limitation discussed above. Prior to October 2012 and in July 2013, the scheduled redemption date for the third quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first nine months of 2013:

Redemption Date	Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date		Units Redeemed		Total Redemption Requests Not Redeemed at Redemption Date
Second Quarter 2012		474,466		474,466		0
Third Quarter 2012		961,236		961,236		0
Fourth Quarter 2012		617,811		46,889		570,922
First Quarter 2013		938,026		114,200		823,826
Second Quarter 2013		1,063,625		637,779		425,846
Third Quarter 2013		677,855		677,855		0

29

The Company has on-going capital commitments to fund its capital improvements. The Company is required, under all of the hotel management agreements and certain loan agreements, to make available, for the repair, replacement, refurbishing of furniture, fixtures, and equipment, a percentage of gross revenues provided that such amount may be used for the Company’s capital expenditures with respect to the hotels. The Company expects that this amount will be adequate to fund required repair, replacement, and refurbishments and to maintain the Company’s hotels in a competitive condition. As of September 30, 2013, the Company held approximately $2.4 million in reserve for capital expenditures. During the first nine months of 2013, the Company invested approximately $6.5 million in capital expenditures and anticipates spending an additional $13-16 million through 2014 on properties owned at September 30, 2013. The Company does not currently have any existing or planned projects for development.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding contracts for the potential purchase of seven additional hotels for a total purchase price of $155.9 million. Of these seven hotels, four are under construction and should be completed over the next two to 12 months from September 30, 2013. Closing on these four hotels is expected upon completion of construction. The three existing hotels are expected to close within the next three months. Although the Company is working towards acquiring these hotels, there are many conditions to closing that have not yet been satisfied and there can be no assurance that closings will occur under the outstanding purchase contracts. The following table summarizes the location, brand, number of rooms, refundable (if the seller does not meet its obligations under the contract) contract deposits paid, and gross purchase price for each of the contracts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.  

Location	Brand	Rooms		Deposits Paid		Gross Purchase Price
Operating (a)
Colorado Springs, CO	Hampton Inn & Suites		101	$	200	$	11,500	(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Courtyard		126	(c)		(c)		(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Residence Inn		124	(c)		(c)		(b)
Under Construction (d)
Dallas, TX	Homewood Suites		130		200		25,350
Fort Lauderdale, FL (e)	Residence Inn		156		3		23,088
Oklahoma City, OK	Hilton Garden Inn		155	(f)		(f)
Oklahoma City, OK	Homewood Suites		100	(f)		(f)
			892	$	1,103	$	155,938

(a)   These hotels are currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from September 30, 2013.

(b)   Purchase contracts for these hotels require the Company to assume approximately $38.8 million in mortgage debt. The loans provide for monthly payments of principal and interest on an amortized basis.

(c)   The Courtyard and Residence Inn hotels in Franklin Cool Springs, TN are located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $51 million and an initial deposit of $400,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

(d)   The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise.  Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these hotels should close over the next 2 to 12 months from September 30, 2013.

(e)   If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.

(f)    The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and deposits of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

It is anticipated that the purchase price, less any debt assumed, for the outstanding contracts will be funded from the proceeds of the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under the Company’s credit facility if a closing occurs.

30

As discussed above in Related Parties, as part of the cost sharing arrangements, the day-to-day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger). To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) may make payments for any or all of the related companies.

Impact of Inflation

Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation. Competitive pressures may, however, limit the operators’ ability to raise room rates. Currently the Company is not experiencing any material impact from inflation.

Business Interruption

Being in the real estate industry, the Company is exposed to natural disasters on both a local and national scale. Although management believes there is adequate insurance to cover this exposure, there can be no assurance that such events will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Seasonality

The hotel industry historically has been seasonal in nature. Seasonal variations in occupancy at the Company’s hotels may cause quarterly fluctuations in its revenues. Generally, occupancy rates and hotel revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. To the extent that cash flow from operations is insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenue, the Company expects to utilize cash on hand or, if necessary, any available other financing sources to make distributions.

Subsequent Events

In October 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $5.3 million, or $0.06875 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.

In October 2013, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 0.6 million Units in the amount of $6.2 million, representing 100% of the requested Unit redemptions.

During October 2013, the Company closed on the issuance of approximately 0.9 million Units through its on-going best-efforts offering, representing gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $9.8 million and proceeds net of selling and marketing costs of approximately $8.8 million.

31

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company does not engage in transactions in derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. As of September 30, 2013, the Company’s financial instruments were not exposed to significant market risk due to foreign currency exchange risk, commodity price risk or equity price risk. The Company will be exposed to interest rate risk due to possible changes in short term interest rates as it invests its cash or borrows on its credit facility. Based on the balance of the Company’s credit facility at September 30, 2013 of $35.1 million, every 100 basis points change in interest rates could impact the Company’s annual net income by approximately $0.4 million, all other factors remaining the same. The Company’s cash balance at September 30, 2013 was $0.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on this evaluation process, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

32

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees filed their Briefs on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The Company faces many risks, a number of which are described under “Risk Factors” in Part I of its 2012 Annual Report and described below. The risks so described may not be the only risks the Company faces. Additional risks of which the Company is not yet aware, or that currently are not significant, may also impair its operations or financial results. If any of the events or circumstances described in the risk factors contained in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report or described below occurs, the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company could be negatively affected. The following updates the disclosures from Item 1A. “Risk Factors” previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with those risk factors.

33

The Company may not realize the anticipated return on its investment in Cripple Creek Energy, LLC.

Cripple Creek Energy, LLC (“CCE”) has no operating history and there can be no assurance that it will be able to implement its acquisition strategy or operating strategy or that it will be profitable. There also can be no assurance that the value of either the collateral or the guarantee provided by Eastern Colorado Holdings, LLC will equal the anticipated return on the Company’s investment in CCE. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company will realize the anticipated return or any particular return on its investment in CCE.

The successful implementation of CCE’s operating strategy is subject to risks inherent in the oil and gas business.

CCE’s operations will be subject to certain economic risks associated with oil and gas development and production activities. The cost and timing of drilling, completing and operating a well is often uncertain, and many factors can adversely affect the economics of a well or property. The presence of unanticipated pressure or unusual geological formations, adverse weather conditions, equipment failures, equipment or personnel shortages, accidents or unanticipated environmental issues may cause CCE’s development and production activities to be delayed or unsuccessful and may result in the total loss of CCE’s investment in a particular property. Additionally, oil and gas prices tend to fluctuate significantly in response to certain factors beyond CCE’s control, including overall domestic and global economic conditions, the impact of conservation measures on the demand for oil and gas, the impact of drilling levels on the supply of oil and gas, weather conditions, the price and availability of alternative fuels, environmental or access issues that could limit future drilling activities industry wide and political instability or armed conflict in oil and gas producing regions. Low oil and gas prices would likely have a material adverse effect on CCE’s financial condition.

The oil and gas business involves a variety of operating hazards that may expose CCE to certain liabilities.

The oil and gas business involves a variety of operating hazards and risks such as well blowouts, pipe failures, casing collapse, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids, fires, spills, pollution, releases of toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. These hazards and risks could result in substantial losses to CCE from, among other things, injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution or other environmental damage, cleanup responsibilities, regulatory investigation and penalties and suspension of operations. In addition, CCE may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of property it purchases or leases. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which could adversely affect CCE’s results of operations and financial condition.

Government regulations may adversely affect CCE.

CCE’s operations will be governed by numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations may, among other potential consequences, require that CCE acquire permits before commencing drilling, restrict the substances that can be released into the environment as a result of drilling and production activities, limit or prohibit drilling or production activities on protected areas such as wetlands or wilderness areas, or require that certain reclamation or remedial measures be implemented by CCE. The costs of complying with these environmental laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on CCE’s results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, the cost of complying with laws and regulations implemented in the future may have a material adverse effect on CCE’s results of operations and financial condition.

34

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds

The Company has registered, effective January 19, 2011, 182,251,082 Units (each Unit consisting of one common share and one Series A preferred share). The managing underwriter is David Lerner and Associates, Inc. The following tables set forth information concerning the on-going best-efforts offering and the use of proceeds from the offering as of September 30, 2013.  All amounts are in thousands, except per Unit data:

Units Registered:
	9,524	Units	$10.50 per Unit	$	100,000
	172,727	Units	$11 per Unit		1,900,000
Totals:	182,251	Units		$	2,000,000
Units Sold:
	9,524	Units	$10.50 per Unit	$	100,000
	69,966	Units	$11 per Unit		769,624
Totals:	79,490	Units			869,624
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution of Units
1. Underwriting discounts and commission					86,962
2. Expenses of underwriters					-
3. Direct or indirect payments to directors or officers of the Company or their associates, to ten percent shareholders, or to affiliates of the Company					-
4. Fees and expenses of third parties					3,069
Total Expenses of Issuance and Distribution of Common Shares					90,031
Net Proceeds to the Company				$	779,593
1. Purchase of real estate (net of debt proceeds assumed and repayment)				$	620,152
2. Deposits and other costs associated with potential real estate acquisitions					1,650
3. Purchase of Preferred Membership Interest in energy company					100,000
4. Repayment of other indebtedness, including interest expense paid					12,664
5. Investment and working capital					29,693
6. Fees to the following (all affiliates of officers of the Company):
a. Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (excludes reimbursed expenses)					1,495
b. Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (excludes reimbursed expenses)					13,939
7. Fees and expenses of third parties					-
8. Other					-
Total of Application of Net Proceeds to the Company				$	779,593

Unit Redemption Program

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program.

35

Since inception of the program through September 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 2.9 million Units in the amount of $29.7 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company redeemed approximately 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.6 million. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis due to the 3% limitation discussed above, with approximately 8% of the amount requested redeemed in the fourth quarter of 2012, 12% in the first quarter of 2013, and 60% in the second quarter of 2013. Prior to October 2012 and in July 2013, the scheduled redemption date for the third quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The Company has a number of cash sources, including cash from operations, proceeds from its on-going best-efforts offering of Units and proceeds from borrowings on its credit facility from which it can make redemptions. See the Company’s complete consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 included in the Company’s interim financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for a further description of the sources and uses of the Company’s cash flows. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first nine months of 2013:

Redemption Date	Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date		Units Redeemed		Total Redemption Requests Not Redeemed at Redemption Date
Second Quarter 2012		474,466		474,466		0
Third Quarter 2012		961,236		961,236		0
Fourth Quarter 2012		617,811		46,889		570,922
First Quarter 2013		938,026		114,200		823,826
Second Quarter 2013		1,063,625		637,779		425,846
Third Quarter 2013		677,855		677,855		0

The following is a summary of redemptions during the third quarter of 2013 (no redemptions occurred in August and September of 2013).

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
	(a)		(b)		(c)		(d)
Period	Total Number of Units Purchased		Average Price Paid per Unit		Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 2013		677,855	$	10.16		677,855		(1)

(1)The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any 12 month period is limited to up to three percent (3.0%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding from the beginning of the 12 month period, subject to the Company’s right to change the number of Units to be redeemed.

36

Item 6.  Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description of Documents
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to amendment no. 4 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed January 7, 2011 and effective January 19, 2011)
3.2	Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended.  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to amendment no. 3 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed December 20, 2010 and effective January 19, 2011)
10.56	Purchase Contract dated as of May 15, 2013 between CHMK Oklahoma Hotel Partners, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.57	Purchase Contract dated as of May 15, 2013 between CHGM Denton Hotel Partners, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.58	Purchase Contract dated as of May 15, 2013 between CHSP Hotel Investors, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.59	Purchase Contract dated as of May 15, 2013 between CHMK Cool Springs Hotel Partners, LLC and CHMK Franklin Hotel Partners, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.60	Purchase Contract dated as of May 21, 2013 between Maple Grove Lodging Investors, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.61	Purchase Contract dated as of May 21, 2013 between Deer Valley Lodging Investors, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.62	Purchase Contract dated as of May 21, 2013 between Deer Valley Hotel Investors II, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.63	Purchase Contract dated as of May 21, 2013 between Phoenix Southwest Lodging Investors I, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.64	Purchase Contract dated as of May 21, 2013 between Omaha Downtown Lodging Investors IV, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.64 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)

37

10.65	Purchase Contract dated as of May 21, 2013 between Omaha Downtown Lodging Investors III, LLC and Apple Ten Hospitality Ownership, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.66	Limited Liability Company Agreement of Cripple Creek Energy, LLC dated as of June 6, 2013 between Eastern Colorado Holdings, LLC and Apple Ten Ventures Services, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 to post-effective amendment no. 10 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-11 (SEC File No. 333-168971) filed July 18, 2013)
10.67	Credit Agreement dated as of July 26, 2013 between Apple Ten Hospitality, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 to current report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 000-54651) filed July 31, 2013)
31.1	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (FILED HEREWITH)
31.2	Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (FILED HEREWITH)
32.1	Certification of the registrant’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (FILED HEREWITH)
101	The following materials from Apple REIT Ten, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail (FILED HEREWITH)

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
By:	/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT	Date: November 6, 2013
	Glade M. Knight,
	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
By:	/s/    BRYAN PEERY	Date: November 6, 2013
	Bryan Peery,
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)

39

EX-31.1

   Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Glade M. Knight, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Apple REIT Ten, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 6, 2013	/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT
	Glade M. Knight Chief Executive Officer
	Apple REIT Ten, Inc.

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan Peery, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Apple REIT Ten, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 6, 2013	/s/    BRYAN PEERY
	Bryan Peery Chief Financial Officer Apple REIT Ten, Inc.

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Ten, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2013, and for the period then ended.

/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT

Glade M. Knight

Chief Executive Officer

/s/    BRYAN PEERY

Bryan Peery

Chief Financial Officer

November 6, 2013

XML

Investment in Real Estate (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Real Estate [Abstract]

Schedule of Business Acquisitions, by Acquisition [Table Text Block]

The Company acquired 12 hotels during the first nine months of 2013. The following table sets forth the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each hotel. All dollar amounts are in thousands.

City	State	Brand	Manager	Date Acquired	Rooms		Gross Purchase Price
Huntsville	AL	Hampton Inn & Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		98	$	11,466
Huntsville	AL	Home2 Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		77		9,009
Fairfax	VA	Marriott	White	3/15/2013		310		34,000
Houston	TX	Residence Inn	Western	6/7/2013		120		18,000
Denton	TX	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		107		11,300
Maple Grove	MN	Hilton Garden Inn	North Central	7/26/2013		120		12,675
Oklahoma City	OK	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		90		11,500
Omaha	NE	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		139		19,775
Omaha	NE	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		123		17,625
Phoenix	AZ	Courtyard	North Central	7/26/2013		127		10,800
Phoenix	AZ	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		125		8,600
Phoenix	AZ	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		134		12,025
Total						1,570	$	176,775

Schedule of Real Estate Properties [Table Text Block]

As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels, located in 17 states, consisting of the following:

	Total by		Number of
Brand	Brand		Rooms
Hilton Garden Inn		10		1,563
Hampton Inn & Suites		8		988
Homewood Suites		8		870
TownePlace Suites		4		388
Courtyard		3		393
Fairfield Inn & Suites		3		310
Home2 Suites		3		304
SpringHill Suites		2		206
Marriott		1		310
Residence Inn		1		120
		43		5,452

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

At September 30, 2013, the Company’s investment in real estate consisted of the following (in thousands):

Land	$	65,358
Building and Improvements		597,957
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment		45,736
Franchise fees		2,965
		712,016
Less Accumulated Depreciation		(36,886	)
Investment in real estate, net	$	675,130

Outstanding Contracts for Potential Purchase of Notes [Table Text Block]

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding contracts for the potential purchase of seven additional hotels for a total purchase price of $155.9 million. Of these seven hotels, four are under construction and should be completed over the next two to 12 months from September 30, 2013. Closing on these four hotels is expected upon completion of construction. The three existing hotels are expected to close within the next three months. Although the Company is working towards acquiring these hotels, there are many conditions to closing that have not yet been satisfied and there can be no assurance that closings will occur under the outstanding purchase contracts. The following table summarizes the location, brand, number of rooms, refundable (if the seller does not meet its obligations under the contract) contract deposits paid, and gross purchase price for each of the contracts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.

Location	Brand	Rooms		Deposits Paid		Gross Purchase Price
Operating (a)
Colorado Springs, CO	Hampton Inn & Suites		101	$	200	$	11,500	(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Courtyard		126	(c)		(c)		(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Residence Inn		124	(c)		(c)		(b)
Under Construction (d)
Dallas, TX	Homewood Suites		130		200		25,350
Fort Lauderdale, FL (e)	Residence Inn		156		3		23,088
Oklahoma City, OK	Hilton Garden Inn		155	(f)		(f)
Oklahoma City, OK	Homewood Suites		100	(f)		(f)
			892	$	1,103	$	155,938

(a)   These hotels are currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from September 30, 2013.

(b)   Purchase contracts for these hotels require the Company to assume approximately $38.8 million in mortgage debt. The loans provide for monthly payments of principal and interest on an amortized basis.

(c)   The Courtyard and Residence Inn hotels in Franklin Cool Springs, TN are located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $51 million and an initial deposit of $400,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

(d)   The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise.  Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these    hotels should close over the next 2 to 12 months from September 30, 2013.

(e)   If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.

(f)    The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and deposits of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Revenues:
Room revenue	$ 40,166	$ 29,627	$ 104,647	$ 80,422
Other revenue	3,595	2,855	10,922	8,004
Total revenue	43,761	32,482	115,569	88,426
Expenses:
Operating expense	11,028	8,069	28,956	21,763
Hotel administrative expense	3,359	2,491	8,967	6,887
Sales and marketing	3,841	2,826	10,015	7,716
Utilities	1,695	1,324	4,094	3,326
Repair and maintenance	1,656	1,039	4,088	2,901
Franchise fees	1,862	1,283	4,810	3,531
Management fees	1,345	1,016	3,691	2,743
Property taxes, insurance and other	2,959	1,834	7,822	5,880
General and administrative	1,119	1,148	3,305	3,470
Acquisition related costs	2,935	607	4,904	1,541
Depreciation expense	5,748	4,094	15,082	11,582
Total expenses	37,547	25,731	95,734	71,340
Operating income	6,214	6,751	19,835	17,086
Investment income	3,533	73	4,467	134
Interest expense	(1,478)	(1,213)	(3,802)	(3,596)
Income before income taxes	8,269	5,611	20,500	13,624
Income tax expense	(87)	(92)	(244)	(231)
Net income	$ 8,182	$ 5,519	$ 20,256	$ 13,393
Basic and diluted net income per common share (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.11	$ 0.09	$ 0.29	$ 0.26
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted (in Shares)	74,887	58,701	70,308	52,066

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

5.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates the fair value of its debt and Energy Investment by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates consistent with the maturity of an instrument with similar credit terms and credit characteristics, which are Level 3 inputs. Market rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. At September 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Company’s Energy Investment as discussed in note 3 approximated fair value. As of September 30, 2013, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was approximately $115.1 million and $119.4 million. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $81.2 million and $85.8 million. The carrying value of the Company’s other financial instruments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

XML

Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Investment in Real Estate (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Investment in Real Estate [Abstract]
Land	$ 65,358
Building and Improvements	597,957
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment	45,736
Franchise fees	2,965
	712,016
Less Accumulated Depreciation	(36,886)	(21,804)
Investment in real estate, net	$ 675,130	$ 506,689

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Shareholders' Equity (Tables) [Line Items]

Summary of Unit Redemptions [Table Text Block]

The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first nine months of 2013:

Redemption Date	Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date		Units Redeemed		Total Redemption Requests Not Redeemed at Redemption Date
Second Quarter 2012		474,466		474,466		0
Third Quarter 2012		961,236		961,236		0
Fourth Quarter 2012		617,811		46,889		570,922
First Quarter 2013		938,026		114,200		823,826
Second Quarter 2013		1,063,625		637,779		425,846
Third Quarter 2013		677,855		677,855		0

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]

Shareholders' Equity (Tables) [Line Items]

Schedule of Conversion of Preferred Stock to Common Stock

Upon the occurrence of any conversion event, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into a number of common shares based upon the gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in the Company’s $2 billion offering according to the following table:

Gross Proceeds Raised from Sales of Units through Date of Conversion	Number of Common Shares through Conversion of One Series B Convertible Preferred Share
$800 million		9.70287
$900 million		10.90855
$    1  billion		12.11423
$ 1.1  billion		13.31991
$ 1.2  billion		14.52559
$ 1.3  billion		15.73128
$ 1.4  billion		16.93696
$ 1.5  billion		18.14264
$ 1.6  billion		19.34832
$ 1.7  billion		20.55400
$ 1.8  billion		21.75968
$ 1.9  billion		22.96537
$    2  billion		24.17104

XML

Credit Facility (Details) (USD $)			0 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Oct. 03, 2013 Subsequent Event [Member] Amended Credit Agreement [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Hotels Acquired on July 26, 2013 [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Revolving Credit Facility $75 Million [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Minimum [Member] Revolving Credit Facility $75 Million [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Maximum [Member] Revolving Credit Facility $75 Million [Member]
Credit Facility (Details) [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity			$ 100,000,000		$ 75,000,000
Line of Credit Facility, Borrowing Capacity, Description			allow for future increases in the amount of the facility up to $150 million, subject to certain conditions
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date, Description					matures in July 2015; however, the Company has the right, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including covenant compliance and payment of an extension fee, to extend the maturity date to July 2016
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate Description					one-month LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate for a one-month term) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.75%, depending upon the Company's leverage ratio, as calculated under the terms of the credit agreement
Line of Credit Facility, Unused Capacity, Commitment Fee Percentage						0.25%	0.35%
Proceeds from Lines of Credit					54,000,000
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Gross					53,600,000
Number of Businesses Acquired				8
Payments of Loan Costs					400,000
Line of Credit Facility, Amount Outstanding	$ 35,103,000	$ 0			$ 35,100,000
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate at Period End					2.43%
Line of Credit Facility, Covenant Terms					The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. In addition, the credit facility contains covenants restricting the level of certain investments and the following quarterly financial covenants (capitalized terms are defined in the credit agreement): Minimum Net Worth shall not be less than $450 million; Total Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 50%; Total Secured Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 30%; Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income to Fixed Charges for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two; Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income attributable to Unencumbered Hotels to Implied Debt Service for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two; Distributions cannot exceed $0.825 per share per year; Additional Unsecured Indebtedness (other than this credit facility) shall not exceed $2.5 million; and Unencumbered Leverage Ratio must be less than 45%.The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at September 30, 2013.

XML

Energy Investment (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012
Energy Investment (Details) [Line Items]
Payments to Acquire Investments			$ 100,000,000	$ 0
Held-to-maturity Securities	100,329,000		100,329,000		0
Investment Income, Interest	3,533,000	73,000	4,467,000	134,000
Energy Investment [Member] | Investment Funded on June 7, 2013 [Member]
Energy Investment (Details) [Line Items]
Payments to Acquire Investments			80,000,000
Energy Investment [Member] | Investment Funded on July 2, 2013 [Member]
Energy Investment (Details) [Line Items]
Payments to Acquire Investments			20,000,000
Energy Investment [Member] | Monthly Distributions [Member]
Energy Investment (Details) [Line Items]
Monthly Distribution, Annual Return			10.00%
Investment Income, Interest	2,500,000		3,100,000
Energy Investment [Member] | Deferred Distributions [Member]
Energy Investment (Details) [Line Items]
Deferred Distribution, Annual Return			4.00%
Investment Income, Interest	1,000,000		1,200,000
Energy Investment [Member]
Energy Investment (Details) [Line Items]
Investment, Purchase Price	100,000,000		100,000,000
Investment, Additional Information			The terms of the Preferred Interest include a distribution to be paid monthly at an annual return of 10% of the Company's "Energy Investment", which includes the funded purchase price plus any unpaid deferred distributions, and a deferred distribution at an annual return of 4% of the Energy Investment to be paid at CCE's option on each monthly distribution date or upon redemption of the Preferred Interest. CCE is required to redeem the Preferred Interest on June 1, 2014, but may elect to extend that date to June 1, 2015. CCE is also permitted to redeem the Preferred Interest in whole or in part at any time. The redemption price is the initial investment plus any unpaid current or deferred distributions. The Preferred Interest ranks senior to any other equity in CCE and CCE's organizational documents limit its permitted indebtedness. The Common Member has guaranteed CCE's payment obligations in connection with the Preferred Interest on a non-recourse basis and has pledged its common membership interest in CCE to secure the guaranty.
Held-to-maturity Securities	100,300,000		100,300,000
Investment Income, Interest	$ 3,500,000		$ 4,300,000

XML

Pro Forma Information (Details) - Pro Forma (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Pro Forma [Abstract]
Total revenues	$ 45,630	$ 43,313	$ 136,617	$ 123,537
Net income	$ 11,351	$ 7,299	$ 28,986	$ 15,244
Net income per share - basic and diluted (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.15	$ 0.11	$ 0.40	$ 0.25

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event	Sep. 30, 2013
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $800 million [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	9.70287
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $900 million [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	10.90855
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	12.11423
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.1 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	13.31991
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.2 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	14.52559
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.3 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	15.73128
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.4 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	16.93696
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.5 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	18.14264
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.6 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	19.34832
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.7 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	20.55400
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.8 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	21.75968
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $1.9 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	22.96537
Number of common shares through conversion if gross proceeds are $2 billion [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock Upon the Occurrence of Any Conversion Event [Line Items]
Number of common shares through conversion of one Series B Convertible Preferred Share	24.17104

XML

Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013		Sep. 30, 2012
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Deposits Paid	$ 1,528,000		$ 72,000
Potential Hampton Inn & Suites Colorado Springs, CO [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Hampton Inn & Suites	[1]
Rooms	101
Deposits Paid	200,000
Gross Purchase Price	11,500,000	[2]
Potential Courtyard Franklin Cool Springs, TN [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Courtyard	[1]
Rooms	126
Deposits Paid		[3]
Gross Purchase Price		[2],[3]
Potential Residence Inn Franklin Cool Springs, TN [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Residence Inn	[1]
Rooms	124
Deposits Paid		[3]
Gross Purchase Price		[2],[3]
Potential Homewood Suites Dallas, TX [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Homewood Suites	[4]
Rooms	130
Deposits Paid	200,000
Gross Purchase Price	25,350,000
Potential Residence Inn Fort Lauderdale, FL [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Residence Inn	[4],[5]
Rooms	156
Deposits Paid	3,000
Gross Purchase Price	23,088,000
Potential Hilton Garden Inn Oklahoma City, OK [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Hilton Garden Inn	[4]
Rooms	155
Deposits Paid		[6]
Gross Purchase Price		[6]
Potential Homewood Suites Oklahoma City, OK [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Brand	Homewood Suites	[4]
Rooms	100
Deposits Paid		[6]
Gross Purchase Price		[6]
Total Potential Acquisitions [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Outstanding Contracts [Line Items]
Rooms	892
Deposits Paid	1,103,000
Gross Purchase Price	$ 155,938,000

[1] These hotels are currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from September 30, 2013.

[2] Purchase contracts for these hotels require the Company to assume approximately $38.8 million in mortgage debt. The loans provide for monthly payments of principal and interest on an amortized basis.

[3] The Courtyard and Residence Inn hotels in Franklin Cool Springs, TN are located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $51 million and an initial deposit of $400,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

[4] The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise. Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these hotels should close over the next 2 to 12 months from September 30, 2013.

[5] If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.

[6] The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and deposits of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation, Basis of Presentation, Business Description and Accounting Policies [Text Block]

1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Apple REIT Ten, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company was formed to invest in hotels and other income-producing real estate in selected metropolitan areas in the United States. Initial capitalization occurred on August 13, 2010, when 10 Units, each Unit consisting of one common share and one Series A preferred share, were purchased by Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”) and 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares, were purchased by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company began operations on March 4, 2011, when it purchased its first hotel. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31. The Company has no foreign operations or assets and its operating structure includes only one reportable segment. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Although the Company has an interest in a variable interest entity through its energy investment and its purchase commitments, it is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have any elements of power in the decision making process of the entity and does not share in any of its benefits, and therefore does not consolidate the entities. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels located in 17 states with an aggregate of 5,452 rooms.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2013 presentation with no effect on previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, and insurance, and reserves for furniture, fixtures, and equipment replacements of up to 5% of property revenue for certain hotels, as required by certain management or mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions.

Offering Costs

The Company is raising capital through an on-going best-efforts offering of Units by David Lerner Associates, Inc., the managing underwriter, which receives a selling commission and a marketing expense allowance based on proceeds of the Units sold. Additionally, the Company has incurred other offering costs including legal, accounting and reporting services. These offering costs are recorded by the Company as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had sold 79.5 million Units for gross proceeds of $869.6 million and proceeds net of offering costs of $779.6 million. Offering costs included $87.0 million in selling commissions and marketing expenses and $3.1 million in other offering costs. On January 4, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the offering until January 19, 2014. As a result, the offering will continue until all Units have been sold or until January 19, 2014, whichever occurs sooner.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated after giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding for the period. There were no potential common shares with a dilutive effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 or 2012. As a result, basic and diluted outstanding shares were the same. Series B convertible preferred shares are not included in earnings per common share calculations until such time that such shares are eligible to be converted to common shares.

XML

Energy Investment

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]

Investments in Debt and Marketable Equity Securities (and Certain Trading Assets) Disclosure [Text Block]

3.  Energy Investment

On June 7, 2013, the Company became the preferred member (the “Preferred Interest”) of Cripple Creek Energy, LLC (“CCE”) pursuant to the Limited Liability Company Agreement of CCE, dated June 6, 2013, between Eastern Colorado Holdings, LLC, as common member (“Common Member”) and Apple Ten Ventures Services, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned taxable subsidiary of the Company (“Preferred Member”). CCE is a newly formed entity that was formed solely for the purpose of acquiring, owning, managing, operating, developing, drilling and disposing of oil and gas leasehold acreage and producing and selling oil, gas and other minerals. The purchase price of the Preferred Interest was $100 million, of which $80 million was funded on June 7, 2013 and the remaining $20 million was funded on July 2, 2013. At the time of purchase, the purchase price approximated fair value. The terms of the Preferred Interest include a distribution to be paid monthly at an annual return of 10% of the Company’s “Energy Investment”, which includes the funded purchase price plus any unpaid deferred distributions, and a deferred distribution at an annual return of 4% of the Energy Investment to be paid at CCE’s option on each monthly distribution date or upon redemption of the Preferred Interest. CCE is required to redeem the Preferred Interest on June 1, 2014, but may elect to extend that date to June 1, 2015. CCE is also permitted to redeem the Preferred Interest in whole or in part at any time. The redemption price is the initial investment plus any unpaid current or deferred distributions. The Preferred Interest ranks senior to any other equity in CCE and CCE’s organizational documents limit its permitted indebtedness. The Common Member has guaranteed CCE’s payment obligations in connection with the Preferred Interest on a non-recourse basis and has pledged its common membership interest in CCE to secure the guaranty.

In accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification Topic on “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” the Company’s Energy Investment is classified as a held-to-maturity debt security and accounted for under the cost method. As of September 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Company’s Energy Investment was $100.3 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, total distributions earned on the Energy Investment were $3.5 million and $4.3 million, including $2.5 million and $3.1 million of monthly distributions and $1.0 million and $1.2 million of deferred distributions, which are included in investment income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

XML

Related Parties

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

6.  Related Parties

The Company has, and is expected to continue to engage in, significant transactions with related parties. These transactions cannot be construed to be at arm’s length and the results of the Company’s operations may be different if these transactions were conducted with non-related parties. The Company’s independent members of the Board of Directors oversee and annually review the Company’s related party relationships (which include the relationships discussed in this section) and are required to approve any significant modifications to the contracts, as well as any new significant related party transactions. There were no changes to the contracts discussed in this section and no new significant related party transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (other than the transactions related to the completion of Apple REIT Six, Inc.’s merger with a third party, the Company’s Energy Investment, and Apple REIT Nine, Inc.’s subcontract agreement with Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. discussed below). The Board of Directors is not required to approve each individual transaction that falls under the related party relationships. However, under the direction of the Board of Directors, at least one member of the Company’s senior management team approves each related party transaction.

The term the “Apple REIT Entities” means Apple REIT Six, Inc. (“Apple Six”), Apple REIT Seven, Inc. (“Apple Seven”), Apple REIT Eight, Inc. (“Apple Eight”), Apple REIT Nine, Inc. (“Apple Nine”) and Apple REIT Ten, Inc. (“Apple Ten”). The term the “Advisors” means Apple Six Advisors, Inc., Apple Seven Advisors, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc. (“A9A”), Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”), Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”) and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. The Advisors are wholly owned by Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Knight is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine. Another member of the Company’s Board of Directors is also on the Board of Directors of Apple Seven and Apple Eight.

On May 14, 2013, Apple Six merged with and into an entity that is not affiliated with the Apple REIT Entities or the Advisors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, dated as of November 29, 2012, upon completion of the merger, the separate corporate existence of Apple Six ceased (the “A6 Merger”). Prior to the A6 Merger, Glade M. Knight was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apple Six.

ASRG Agreement

The Company has a contract with ASRG, to acquire and dispose of real estate assets for the Company. A fee of 2% of the gross purchase price or gross sale price in addition to certain reimbursable expenses is paid to ASRG for these services. As of September 30, 2013, payments to ASRG for fees under the terms of this contract have totaled approximately $13.9 million since inception. Of this amount, the Company incurred $3.5 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, which is included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

A10A Agreement

The Company is party to an advisory agreement with A10A, pursuant to which A10A provides management services to the Company. A10A provides these management services through Apple Fund Management LLC (“AFM”), which immediately after the A6 Merger became a wholly-owned subsidiary of A9A. This transaction between A9A and Apple Six was made with no cash consideration exchanged between the entities. Prior to May 14, 2013, AFM was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apple Six. An annual fee ranging from 0.1% to 0.25% of total equity proceeds received by the Company, in addition to certain reimbursable expenses as described below, are payable to A10A for these management services. Total advisory fees incurred by the Company under the advisory agreement are included in general and administrative expenses and totaled approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

On August 8, 2013, Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine announced that they have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which Apple Seven and Apple Eight will merge into Apple Nine in two merger transactions (the “Mergers”), and that as a result of this transaction, Apple Nine will become self-advised and each of Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine will terminate its advisory agreements with its advisors. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, on August 7, 2013, Apple Nine entered into a subcontract agreement, as amended, (the “Subcontract Agreement”) with A10A. Pursuant to the Subcontract Agreement, A10A will subcontract its obligations under the advisory agreement between A10A and the Company (the “Advisory Agreement”) to Apple Nine. The Subcontract Agreement provides that, from and after the effective time of the Mergers, Apple Nine will provide to the Company the advisory services contemplated under the Advisory Agreement and Apple Nine will receive the fees and expenses payable under the Advisory Agreement from the Company. The Company also signed the Subcontract Agreement to acknowledge the terms of the Subcontract Agreement. The Subcontract Agreement has no effect on the Company’s contract with A10A.

Apple REIT Entities and Advisors Cost Sharing Structure

In addition to the fees payable to ASRG and A10A, the Company reimbursed to ASRG or A10A, or paid directly to AFM or Apple Nine on behalf of ASRG or A10A, approximately $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The expenses reimbursed were approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for costs reimbursed under the contract with ASRG and approximately $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for costs reimbursed under the contract with A10A in each period. The costs are included in general and administrative expenses and are for the Company’s allocated share of the staffing and related costs provided by AFM and Apple Nine at the direction of A10A.

AFM is an affiliate of each of the Advisors. Each of the Advisors provides management services through the use of AFM to, respectively, Apple Six (prior to the A6 Merger), Apple Seven, Apple Eight, Apple Nine and Apple Ten. In connection with the A6 Merger, effective May 14, 2013, the entire membership interest of Apple Six in AFM was transferred and assigned to A9A, which then became the sole member of AFM. As part of the assignment, A9A and the other Advisors agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple Six for liabilities related to AFM. The assignment of AFM’s interest to A9A had no impact on the Company’s advisory agreement with A10A or the process of allocating costs from AFM to the Apple REIT Entities or Advisors as described below, except Apple Six and its advisors, Apple Six Advisors, Inc. and Apple Six Realty Group, Inc. (collectively “A6 Advisors”), no longer participate in the cost sharing arrangement, thereby increasing the remaining companies’ share of the allocated costs.

Also, in connection with the A6 Merger, on May 13, 2013, Apple Nine acquired from Apple Six the Apple REIT Entities’ and Advisors’ headquarters in Richmond, Virginia (“Headquarters”) and assumed the Fort Worth, Texas office lease agreement. As described below, any costs associated with the Headquarters and office lease, including office rent, utilities, office supplies, etc. (“Office Related Costs”) will continue to be allocated to the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors.

Prior to the A6 Merger, amounts reimbursed to AFM included both compensation for personnel and Office Related Costs used by the companies. As discussed above, as a result of the A6 Merger, beginning on May 14, 2013, Office Related Costs are now allocated from Apple Nine to the other Apple REIT Entities and Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors. Each of these companies has agreed to reimburse Apple Nine for its share of these costs. From the period May 14, 2013 through September 30, 2013, the Company reimbursed Apple Nine approximately $0.1 million (included above in the total costs of $1.3 million related to the Company’s agreements with A10A and ASRG) for its share of Office Related Costs, which are included in general and administrative costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

All of the Office Related Costs and costs of AFM are allocated among the Apple REIT Entities and the Advisors, excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger. The allocation of costs is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committees of the Apple REIT Entities. In making the allocation, management of each of the entities and their Compensation Committee consider all relevant facts related to each company’s level of business activity and the extent to which each company requires the services of particular personnel of AFM. Such payments are based on the actual costs of the services and are not based on formal record keeping regarding the time these personnel devote to the Company, but are based on a good faith estimate by the employee and/or his or her supervisor of the time devoted by the employee to the Company. Although there is a potential conflict on time allocation of employees due to the fact that a senior manager, officer or staff member will provide services to more than one company, the Company believes that the executives and staff compensation sharing arrangement described more fully below allows the companies to share costs yet attract and retain superior executives and staff. The cost sharing structure also allows each entity to maintain a much more cost effective structure than having separate staffing arrangements. Since the employees of AFM perform services for the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors at the direction of the Advisors, individuals, including executive officers, receive their compensation at the direction of the Advisors and may receive consideration directly from the Advisors.

As part of the cost sharing arrangements, the day-to-day transactions may result in amounts due to or from the Apple REIT Entities and Advisors (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger). To efficiently manage cash disbursements, an individual Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) may make payments for any or all of the related companies. The amounts due to or from the related Apple REIT Entity or Advisor (excluding Apple Six and A6 Advisors after the A6 Merger) are reimbursed or collected and are not significant in amount.

The Company has incurred legal fees associated with the Legal Proceedings discussed herein. The Company also incurs other professional fees such as accounting, auditing and reporting. These fees are included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. To be cost effective, these services received by the Company are shared as applicable across the other Apple REIT Entities. The professionals cannot always specifically identify their fees for one company; therefore management allocates these costs across the companies that benefit from the services. The total costs for the Legal Proceedings discussed herein for all of the Apple REIT Entities (excluding Apple Six after the A6 Merger) was approximately $2.2 million for the first nine months of 2013, of which approximately $0.2 million was allocated to the Company. Total costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for all of the Apple REIT Entities was approximately $5.7 million, of which approximately $0.7 million was allocated to the Company.

Apple Air Holding, LLC (“Apple Air”) Membership Interest

Included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 is a 26% equity investment in Apple Air. The other current members of Apple Air are Apple Seven, Apple Eight and Apple Nine. In connection with the A6 Merger, on May 13, 2013, the Company acquired its membership interest in Apple Air from Apple Six for approximately $1.45 million. The membership interest includes all rights and obligations previously held by Apple Six under Apple Air’s operating agreement. Also as part of the purchase, the Company agreed to indemnify the buyer of Apple Six for any liabilities related to the membership interest. The Company’s equity investment was approximately $1.3 million as of September 30, 2013. The Company has recorded its share of income and losses of the entity under the equity method of accounting and adjusted its investment in Apple Air accordingly. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $109,000 as its share of the net loss of Apple Air, which primarily relates to the depreciation of the aircraft, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Through its equity investment, the Company has access to Apple Air’s aircraft for acquisition, asset management and renovation purposes. Additionally, prior to May 13, 2013, the Company, on occasion, used the Learjet owned by Apple Air for acquisition, asset management and renovation purposes. Total costs paid for the usage of the aircraft for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $218,000 and $133,000.

Energy Investment

The Company’s Preferred Interest investment in CCE was identified by an unaffiliated entity in which one of the Company’s Board of Directors is a partner. The entity earned a finder’s fee from the Common Member.

XML

Credit Facility

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

4.  Credit Facility

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with a commercial bank in an initial amount of $75 million. On October 3, 2013, the credit agreement was amended to increase the amount of the facility to $100 million and to allow for future increases in the amount of the facility up to $150 million, subject to certain conditions. The credit facility will be utilized for acquisitions, hotel renovations, working capital and other general corporate funding purposes, including the payment of redemptions and distributions. Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company may make voluntary prepayments in whole or in part, at any time. The credit facility matures in July 2015; however, the Company has the right, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including covenant compliance and payment of an extension fee, to extend the maturity date to July 2016. Interest payments are due monthly and the interest rate, subject to certain exceptions, is equal to the one-month LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate for a one-month term) plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.75%, depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio, as calculated under the terms of the credit agreement. The Company is also required to pay an unused facility fee of 0.25% or 0.35% on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, based on the amount of borrowings outstanding during each quarter.

On the day of closing of the credit facility, the Company borrowed $54.0 million under the credit facility, of which $53.6 million was used to fund a portion of the aggregate purchase price of eight hotels that closed on July 26, 2013 and $0.4 million was used to pay loan origination costs, which are being amortized as interest expense through the July 2015 maturity date.As of September 30, 2013, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $35.1 million and an annual interest rate of approximately 2.43%.

The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. In addition, the credit facility contains covenants restricting the level of certain investments and the following quarterly financial covenants (capitalized terms are defined in the credit agreement):

·   Minimum Net Worth shall not be less than $450 million;

·   Total Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 50%;

·   Total Secured Indebtedness to Total Asset Value must not exceed 30%;

·   Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income to Fixed Charges for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two;

·   Ratio of Adjusted Net Operating Income attributable to Unencumbered Hotels to Implied Debt Service for the four trailing quarters must equal or exceed two;

·   Distributions cannot exceed $0.825 per share per year;

·   Additional Unsecured Indebtedness (other than this credit facility) shall not exceed $2.5 million; and

·   Unencumbered Leverage Ratio must be less than 45%.

The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at September 30, 2013.

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Long-term Debt	$ 115.1	$ 81.2
Long-term Debt, Fair Value	$ 119.4	$ 85.8

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Schedule of Unit Redemption (Redemptions [Member])	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Redemptions [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) - Schedule of Unit Redemption [Line Items]
Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date	677,855	1,063,625	938,026	617,811	961,236	474,466
Units Redeemed (in Shares)	677,855	637,779	114,200	46,889	961,236	474,466
Total Redemption Requests Not Redeemed at Redemption Date	0	425,846	823,826	570,922	0	0

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parentheticals) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Real estate accumulated depreciation (in Dollars)	$ 36,886	$ 21,804
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in Shares)	30,000,000	30,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in Shares)	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in Shares)	0	0
Common stock, shares authorized (in Shares)	400,000,000	400,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in Shares)	76,577,211	64,983,511
Common stock, shares outstanding (in Shares)	76,577,211	64,983,511
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in Shares)	400,000,000	400,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in Shares)	76,577,211	64,983,511
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in Shares)	76,577,211	64,983,511
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in Shares)	480,000	480,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in Shares)	480,000	480,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in Shares)	480,000	480,000

XML

Legal Proceedings

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Disclosure Text Block Supplement [Abstract]

Legal Matters and Contingencies [Text Block]

9.  Legal Proceedings

On December 13, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered that three putative class actions, Kronberg, et al. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc., et al., Kowalski v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., and Leff v. Apple REIT Ten, Inc., et al., be consolidated and amended the caption of the consolidated matter to be In re Apple REITs Litigation. The District Court also appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel for the consolidated action and ordered lead plaintiffs to file and serve a consolidated complaint by February 17, 2012. The Company was previously named as a party in all three of the above mentioned class action lawsuits.

On February 17, 2012, lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in the In re Apple REITs Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02919-KAM-JO, filed an amended consolidated complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company, Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc., Apple Eight Advisors, Inc., Apple Nine Advisors, Inc., Apple Ten Advisors, Inc., Apple Fund Management, LLC, Apple REIT Six, Inc., Apple REIT Seven, Inc., Apple REIT Eight, Inc. and Apple REIT Nine, Inc., their directors and certain officers, and David Lerner Associates, Inc. and David Lerner. The consolidated complaint, which was dismissed in April 2013, was purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Units in the Company and the other Apple REIT Entities, or those who otherwise acquired these Units that were offered and sold to them by David Lerner Associates, Inc., or its affiliates and on behalf of subclasses of shareholders in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Florida, and alleges that the Apple REIT Entities “misrepresented the investment objectives of the Apple REITs, the dividend payment policy of the Apple REITs, and the value of their Apple REIT investments.” The consolidated complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as claims for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and unjust enrichment, and claims for violation of the securities laws of Connecticut and Florida. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification of a putative nationwide class and the state subclasses, damages, rescission of share purchases and other costs and expenses.

On April 18, 2012, the Company, and the other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in the In re Apple REITs Litigation. By Order entered on March 31, 2013 and opinion issued on April 3, 2013, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in its entirety with prejudice and without leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on April 12, 2013, and filed their Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants on July 26, 2013. Defendants-Appellees filed their Briefs on October 25, 2013. The Company believes that Plaintiffs’ claims against it, its officers and directors and other Apple REIT Entities were properly dismissed by the lower court, and intends to vigorously defend the judgment as entered. In the event some or all of Plaintiffs’ claims are revived as a result of Plaintiffs’ appeal, the Company will, once again, defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or provide a reasonable estimate of the possible loss or range of loss due to these proceedings, if any.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$ 20,256	$ 13,393
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	15,082	11,582
Amortization of deferred financing costs, fair value adjustments and other non-cash expenses, net	197	140
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in due from third party managers, net	(4,050)	(3,344)
(Increase) decrease in other assets, net	(927)	156
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,930	1,109
Net cash provided by operating activities	32,488	23,036
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Cash paid for energy investment	(100,000)	0
Cash paid for the acquisition of hotel properties	(177,379)	(51,226)
Deposits and other disbursements for potential acquisitions, net	(1,528)	(72)
Capital improvements	(6,543)	(5,241)
Decrease in capital improvement reserves	4,044	648
Investment in other assets	(1,450)	0
Net cash used in investing activities	(282,856)	(55,891)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds related to issuance of Units	128,409	198,532
Redemptions of Units	(14,611)	(14,546)
Distributions paid to common shareholders	(43,389)	(32,011)
Net proceeds from credit facility	35,103	0
Payments of notes payable	(1,144)	(1,048)
Deferred financing costs	(530)	(132)
Net cash provided by financing activities	103,838	150,795
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(146,530)	117,940
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	146,530	7,079
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	0	125,019
Non-cash transactions:
Notes payable assumed in acquisitions	$ 0	$ 13,067

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Assets
Investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation of $36,886 and $21,804, respectively	$ 675,130	$ 506,689
Energy investment	100,329	0
Cash and cash equivalents	0	146,530
Restricted cash-furniture, fixtures and other escrows	5,137	9,396
Due from third party managers, net	6,432	2,481
Other assets, net	7,420	2,689
Total Assets	794,448	667,785
Liabilities
Credit facility	35,103	0
Notes payable	79,972	81,186
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	9,123	7,074
Total Liabilities	124,198	88,260
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, value issued	0	0
Common stock, no par value, authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 76,577,211 and 64,983,511 shares, respectively	750,049	636,191
Distributions greater than net income	(79,847)	(56,714)
Total Shareholders' Equity	670,250	579,525
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	794,448	667,785
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, value issued	0	0
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, value issued	$ 48	$ 48

XML

Related Parties (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	9 Months Ended			38 Months Ended	9 Months Ended																5 Months Ended
	May 14, 2013 Cash Consideration Exchanged Between Entities [Member] Assignment and Transfer of Apple REIT Six, Inc.'s Interest in Apple Fund Management to Apple Nine Advisors (A9A) [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Acquisition of Membership Interest in Apple Air Holding, LLC from Apple REIT Six, Inc. [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member] Real Estate Acquisition and Disposal Fees Incurred [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member] Real Estate Acquisition and Disposal Fees Incurred [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member] Real Estate Acquisition and Disposal Fees Incurred [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member] Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Staffing and Related Costs Provided by Related Party [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member] Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Staffing and Related Costs Provided by Related Party [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Ten Advisors (A10A) [Member] Advisory Fees Incurred [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Apple Ten Advisors (A10A) [Member] Advisory Fees Incurred [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Ten Advisors (A10A) [Member] Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Staffing and Related Costs Provided by Related Party [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Apple Ten Advisors (A10A) [Member] Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Staffing and Related Costs Provided by Related Party [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Ten Advisors (A10A) [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 ASRG and A10A [Member] Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Staffing and Related Costs Provided by Related Party [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 ASRG and A10A [Member] Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Staffing and Related Costs Provided by Related Party [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 All Apple REIT Entities [Member] Legal Proceedings and SEC Investigation [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 All Apple REIT Entities [Member] Legal Proceedings and SEC Investigation [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple REIT Ten, Inc. [Member] Legal Proceedings and SEC Investigation [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Apple REIT Ten, Inc. [Member] Legal Proceedings and SEC Investigation [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Apple Air Holding, LLC [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Apple Air Holding, LLC [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Reimbursement to Related Party for Company's Proportionate Share of Office Related Costs Provided by Apple REIT Nine, Inc. [Member]
Related Parties (Details) [Line Items]
Real estate acquisition and disposal fee, Related Party, Percent								2.00%
Costs and Expenses, Related Party			$ 3,500,000	$ 1,200,000	$ 13,900,000	$ 400,000	$ 400,000		$ 600,000	$ 400,000	$ 900,000	$ 800,000		$ 1,300,000	$ 1,200,000							$ 100,000
Related Party Transaction, Amounts of Transaction	0	1,450,000
Management Advisory Fee, Related Party, Percent													0.1% to 0.25%
Legal Fees																2,200,000	5,700,000	200,000	700,000
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage																				26.00%
Equity Method Investments																				1,300,000
Income (Loss) from Equity Method Investments																				(109,000)
Aircraft usage fees																				$ 218,000	$ 133,000

XML

Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Hotels	Sep. 30, 2013
Hilton Garden Inn [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	10
Number of Rooms	1,563
Hampton Inn & Suites [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	8
Number of Rooms	988
Homewood Suites [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	8
Number of Rooms	870
TownePlace Suites [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	4
Number of Rooms	388
Courtyard [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	3
Number of Rooms	393
Fairfield Inn & Suites [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	3
Number of Rooms	310
Home2 Suites [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	3
Number of Rooms	304
SpringHill Suites [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	2
Number of Rooms	206
Marriott [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	1
Number of Rooms	310
Residence Inn [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	1
Number of Rooms	120
Total [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total by Brand	43
Number of Rooms	5,452

XML

Subsequent Events (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended		1 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Oct. 31, 2013 Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Events (Details) [Line Items]
Payments of Ordinary Dividends, Common Stock	$ 43,389,000	$ 32,011,000	$ 5,300,000
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid (in Dollars per share)			$ 0.06875
Units Redeemed (in Shares)			600,000
Payments for Redemption of Units	14,611,000	14,546,000	6,200,000
Redemption requests redeemed, percentage			100.00%
Units Sold (in Shares)			900,000
Proceeds from issuance or sale of equity, gross			9,800,000
Proceeds from Issuance or Sale of Equity	$ 128,409,000	$ 198,532,000	$ 8,800,000

XML

Pro Forma Information

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Business Combination Disclosure [Text Block]

8.  Pro Forma Information

The following unaudited pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented as if the acquisitions of the Company’s hotels acquired after December 31, 2011 had occurred on the latter of January 1, 2012 or the opening date of the hotel (six of the Company’s hotels opened after January 1, 2012). The pro forma information does not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations would actually have been if such transactions, in fact, had occurred on these applicable dates, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. Amounts are in thousands, except per share data.

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Total revenues	$	45,630	$	43,313	$	136,617	$	123,537
Net income		11,351		7,299		28,986		15,244
Net income per share - basic and diluted	$	0.15	$	0.11	$	0.40	$	0.25

The pro forma information reflects adjustments for actual revenues and expenses of the 17 hotels acquired during 2012 and 2013 for the respective period owned prior to acquisition by the Company. Net income has been adjusted as follows: (1) interest income and expense has been adjusted to reflect the reduction in cash and cash equivalents required to fund the acquisitions; (2) interest expense related to prior owner’s debt which was not assumed has been eliminated; (3) depreciation has been adjusted based on the Company’s basis in the hotels; and (4) transaction costs have been adjusted for the acquisition of existing businesses.

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended					9 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	9 Months Ended			18 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Triggering Event on Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares if maximum offer is achieved [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Triggering Event on Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares based on equity raised through end of reporting period [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Unit Redemption Program [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Unit Redemption Program [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Unit Redemption Program [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Unit Redemption Program [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Unit Redemption Program [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Unit Redemption Program [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Distributions [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Distributions [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Distributions [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Distributions [Member]
Shareholders' Equity (Details) [Line Items]
Preferred Stock, Shares Issued (in Shares)	0		0	480,000	480,000
Shares Issued, Price Per Share (in Dollars per share)				$ 0.10
Preferred Stock, Value, Issued	$ 0		$ 0	$ 48,000	$ 48,000
Proportion of ownership required to approve amendments to articles of incorporation						Holders of more than two-thirds of the Series B convertible preferred shares
Preferred Stock, Liquidation Payment Per Share (in Dollars per share)						$ 11.00
Total amount of Unit offering						2,000,000,000
Conversion Formula Used In Subsequent Public Offering						(X/100 million) x 1.20568, where X is the additional gross proceeds rounded down to the nearest $100 million
Expense Related to the Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares, minimum							0	0
Expense Related to the Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares, maximum							in excess of $127 million
Per Common Share Fair Market Value Assumption (in Dollars per share)							$ 11	$ 11
Expense Related to the Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Shares, maximum amount								51,200,000
Common shares issued (in Shares)								4,700,000
Unit redemption eligibility period											1 year
Redemption rate, Units owned less than 5 years											92.50%
Redemption rate, Units owned more than 5 years											100.00%
Weighted average number of Units outstanding, percentage redeemable											3.00%
Units Redeemed (in Shares)											1,400,000		1,400,000	2,900,000
Payments for Redemption of Units	14,611,000	14,546,000									14,600,000		14,500,000	29,700,000
Redemption requests redeemed, description												pro-rata basis
Redemption requests redeemed, percentage									100.00%	100.00%
Annual Distribution rate (in Dollars per share)																	$ 0.825
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid (in Dollars per share)															$ 0.20625	$ 0.20625	$ 0.61875	$ 0.61875
Payments of Ordinary Dividends, Common Stock	$ 43,389,000	$ 32,011,000													$ 15,400,000	$ 12,100,000	$ 43,400,000	$ 32,000,000

XML

Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

Organization

Apple REIT Ten, Inc. together with its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Virginia corporation that has elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company was formed to invest in hotels and other income-producing real estate in selected metropolitan areas in the United States. Initial capitalization occurred on August 13, 2010, when 10 Units, each Unit consisting of one common share and one Series A preferred share, were purchased by Apple Ten Advisors, Inc. (“A10A”) and 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares, were purchased by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company began operations on March 4, 2011, when it purchased its first hotel. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31. The Company has no foreign operations or assets and its operating structure includes only one reportable segment. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Although the Company has an interest in a variable interest entity through its energy investment and its purchase commitments, it is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have any elements of power in the decision making process of the entity and does not share in any of its benefits, and therefore does not consolidate the entities. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels located in 17 states with an aggregate of 5,452 rooms.

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2013 presentation with no effect on previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, and insurance, and reserves for furniture, fixtures, and equipment replacements of up to 5% of property revenue for certain hotels, as required by certain management or mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions.

Offering Costs [Policy Text Block]

Offering Costs

The Company is raising capital through an on-going best-efforts offering of Units by David Lerner Associates, Inc., the managing underwriter, which receives a selling commission and a marketing expense allowance based on proceeds of the Units sold. Additionally, the Company has incurred other offering costs including legal, accounting and reporting services. These offering costs are recorded by the Company as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had sold 79.5 million Units for gross proceeds of $869.6 million and proceeds net of offering costs of $779.6 million. Offering costs included $87.0 million in selling commissions and marketing expenses and $3.1 million in other offering costs. On January 4, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the offering until January 19, 2014. As a result, the offering will continue until all Units have been sold or until January 19, 2014, whichever occurs sooner.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated after giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding for the period. There were no potential common shares with a dilutive effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 or 2012. As a result, basic and diluted outstanding shares were the same. Series B convertible preferred shares are not included in earnings per common share calculations until such time that such shares are eligible to be converted to common shares.

XML

Shareholders' Equity

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity Note Disclosure [Text Block]

7.  Shareholders’ Equity

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company has issued 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Glade M. Knight, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in exchange for the payment by him of $0.10 per Series B convertible preferred share, or an aggregate of $48,000. The Series B convertible preferred shares are convertible into common shares pursuant to the formula and on the terms and conditions set forth below.

There are no dividends payable on the Series B convertible preferred shares. Holders of more than two-thirds of the Series B convertible preferred shares must approve any proposed amendment to the articles of incorporation that would adversely affect the Series B convertible preferred shares.

Upon the Company’s liquidation, the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is entitled to a priority liquidation payment before any distribution of liquidation proceeds to the holders of the common shares. However, the priority liquidation payment of the holder of the Series B convertible preferred shares is junior to the holders of the Series A preferred shares’ distribution rights. The holder of a Series B convertible preferred share is entitled to a liquidation payment of $11.00 per number of common shares each Series B convertible preferred share would be convertible into according to the formula described below. In the event that the liquidation of the Company’s assets results in proceeds that exceed the distribution rights of the Series A preferred shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, the remaining proceeds will be distributed between the common shares and the Series B convertible preferred shares, on an as converted basis.

Each holder of outstanding Series B convertible preferred shares shall have the right to convert any of such shares into common shares of the Company upon and for 180 days following the occurrence of any of the following events:

(1) substantially all of the Company’s assets, stock or business is sold or transferred through exchange, merger, consolidation, lease, share exchange, sale or otherwise, other than a sale of assets in liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company;

(2) the termination or expiration without renewal of the advisory agreement with A10A, or if the Company ceases to use ASRG to provide property acquisition and disposition services; or

(3) the Company’s common shares are listed on any securities exchange or quotation system or in any established market.

Upon the occurrence of any conversion event, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into a number of common shares based upon the gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in the Company’s $2 billion offering according to the following table:

Gross Proceeds Raised from Sales of Units through Date of Conversion	Number of Common Shares through Conversion of One Series B Convertible Preferred Share
$800 million		9.70287
$900 million		10.90855
$    1  billion		12.11423
$ 1.1  billion		13.31991
$ 1.2  billion		14.52559
$ 1.3  billion		15.73128
$ 1.4  billion		16.93696
$ 1.5  billion		18.14264
$ 1.6  billion		19.34832
$ 1.7  billion		20.55400
$ 1.8  billion		21.75968
$ 1.9  billion		22.96537
$    2  billion		24.17104

In the event that after raising gross proceeds of $2 billion, the Company raises additional gross proceeds in a subsequent public offering, each Series B convertible preferred share may be converted into an additional number of common shares based on the additional gross proceeds raised through the date of conversion in a subsequent public offering according to the following formula: (X/100 million) x 1.20568, where X is the additional gross proceeds rounded down to the nearest $100 million.

No additional consideration is due upon the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares. The conversion into common shares of the Series B convertible preferred shares will result in dilution of the shareholders’ interests and the termination of the Series A preferred shares.

Expense related to the issuance of 480,000 Series B convertible preferred shares to Mr. Knight will be recognized at such time when the number of common shares to be issued for conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares can be reasonably estimated and the event triggering the conversion of the Series B convertible preferred shares to common shares occurs. The expense will be measured as the difference between the fair value of the common stock for which the Series B convertible preferred shares can be converted and the amounts paid for the Series B convertible preferred shares. Although the fair market value cannot be determined at this time, expense if the maximum offering is achieved could range from $0 to in excess of $127 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value). Based on equity raised through September 30, 2013, if a triggering event had occurred, expense would have ranged from $0 to $51.2 million (assumes $11 per common share fair market value) and approximately 4.7 million common shares would have been issued.

Unit Redemption Program

In April 2012, the Company instituted a Unit Redemption Program to provide limited interim liquidity to its shareholders who have held their Units for at least one year. Shareholders may request redemption of Units for a purchase price equal to 92.5% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned for less than five years, or 100% of the price paid per Unit if the Units have been owned more than five years. The maximum number of Units that may be redeemed in any given year is three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. The Company reserves the right to change the purchase price of redemptions, reject any request for redemption, or otherwise amend the terms of, suspend, or terminate the Unit Redemption Program. Since the inception of the program through September 30, 2013, the Company has redeemed approximately 2.9 million Units in the amount of $29.7 million, including 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.6 million and 1.4 million Units in the amount of $14.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. As contemplated in the program, beginning with the October 2012 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the fourth quarter of 2012, through the April 2013 redemption, the scheduled redemption date for the second quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed Units on a pro-rata basis due to the 3% limitation discussed above. Prior to October 2012 and in July 2013, the scheduled redemption date for the third quarter of 2013, the Company redeemed 100% of redemption requests. The following is a summary of the Unit redemptions during 2012 and the first nine months of 2013:

Redemption Date	Total Requested Unit Redemptions at Redemption Date		Units Redeemed		Total Redemption Requests Not Redeemed at Redemption Date
Second Quarter 2012		474,466		474,466		0
Third Quarter 2012		961,236		961,236		0
Fourth Quarter 2012		617,811		46,889		570,922
First Quarter 2013		938,026		114,200		823,826
Second Quarter 2013		1,063,625		637,779		425,846
Third Quarter 2013		677,855		677,855		0

Distributions

The Company’s annual distribution rate as of September 30, 2013 was $0.825 per common share, payable monthly. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.20625 per common share for a total of $15.4 million and $12.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company made distributions of $0.61875 per common share for a total of $43.4 million and $32.0 million.

XML

Investment in Real Estate

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Real Estate [Abstract]

Real Estate Disclosure [Text Block]

2.  Investment in Real Estate

The Company acquired 12 hotels during the first nine months of 2013. The following table sets forth the location, brand, manager, date acquired, number of rooms and gross purchase price for each hotel. All dollar amounts are in thousands.

City	State	Brand	Manager	Date Acquired	Rooms		Gross Purchase Price
Huntsville	AL	Hampton Inn & Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		98	$	11,466
Huntsville	AL	Home2 Suites	LBA	3/14/2013		77		9,009
Fairfax	VA	Marriott	White	3/15/2013		310		34,000
Houston	TX	Residence Inn	Western	6/7/2013		120		18,000
Denton	TX	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		107		11,300
Maple Grove	MN	Hilton Garden Inn	North Central	7/26/2013		120		12,675
Oklahoma City	OK	Homewood Suites	Chartwell	7/26/2013		90		11,500
Omaha	NE	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		139		19,775
Omaha	NE	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		123		17,625
Phoenix	AZ	Courtyard	North Central	7/26/2013		127		10,800
Phoenix	AZ	Hampton Inn & Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		125		8,600
Phoenix	AZ	Homewood Suites	North Central	7/26/2013		134		12,025
Total						1,570	$	176,775

The purchase price for these properties was funded by the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company also used proceeds from its on-going best-efforts offering and borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility to pay approximately $4.9 million in acquisition related costs, including $3.5 million, representing 2% of the gross purchase price for these hotels, as a brokerage commission to Apple Suites Realty Group, Inc. (“ASRG”), 100% owned by Glade M. Knight, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and approximately $1.4 million in other acquisition related costs, including title, legal and other related costs. These costs are included in acquisition related costs in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

For the 12 hotels acquired during the first nine months of 2013, the amount of revenue and operating income (excluding acquisition related costs totaling $4.8 million) included in the Company’s consolidated income statement from the acquisition date to the period ending September 30, 2013 was approximately $14.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

The Company leases all of its hotels to its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (or a subsidiary thereof) under master hotel lease agreements.

 In connection with the acquisitions of the Phoenix, Arizona Hampton Inn & Suites and Homewood Suites hotels in July 2013, the Company assumed two land leases with remaining lease terms of 87 years. The leases were valued at below market rates and as a result the Company recorded in-place favorable lease assets totaling $0.6 million which are included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are being amortized over the remaining lease terms. As of September 30, 2013 the remaining minimum lease payments are approximately $16.0 million.

No goodwill was recorded in connection with any of the acquisitions.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 43 hotels, located in 17 states, consisting of the following:

	Total by		Number of
Brand	Brand		Rooms
Hilton Garden Inn		10		1,563
Hampton Inn & Suites		8		988
Homewood Suites		8		870
TownePlace Suites		4		388
Courtyard		3		393
Fairfield Inn & Suites		3		310
Home2 Suites		3		304
SpringHill Suites		2		206
Marriott		1		310
Residence Inn		1		120
		43		5,452

At September 30, 2013, the Company’s investment in real estate consisted of the following (in thousands):

Land	$	65,358
Building and Improvements		597,957
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment		45,736
Franchise fees		2,965
		712,016
Less Accumulated Depreciation		(36,886	)
Investment in real estate, net	$	675,130

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding contracts for the potential purchase of seven additional hotels for a total purchase price of $155.9 million. Of these seven hotels, four are under construction and should be completed over the next two to 12 months from September 30, 2013. Closing on these four hotels is expected upon completion of construction. The three existing hotels are expected to close within the next three months. Although the Company is working towards acquiring these hotels, there are many conditions to closing that have not yet been satisfied and there can be no assurance that closings will occur under the outstanding purchase contracts. The following table summarizes the location, brand, number of rooms, refundable (if the seller does not meet its obligations under the contract) contract deposits paid, and gross purchase price for each of the contracts. All dollar amounts are in thousands.  

Location	Brand	Rooms		Deposits Paid		Gross Purchase Price
Operating (a)
Colorado Springs, CO	Hampton Inn & Suites		101	$	200	$	11,500	(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Courtyard		126	(c)		(c)		(b)
Franklin Cool Springs, TN	Residence Inn		124	(c)		(c)		(b)
Under Construction (d)
Dallas, TX	Homewood Suites		130		200		25,350
Fort Lauderdale, FL (e)	Residence Inn		156		3		23,088
Oklahoma City, OK	Hilton Garden Inn		155	(f)		(f)
Oklahoma City, OK	Homewood Suites		100	(f)		(f)
			892	$	1,103	$	155,938

(a)   These hotels are currently operational and assuming all conditions to closing are met should close within three months from September 30, 2013.

(b)   Purchase contracts for these hotels require the Company to assume approximately $38.8 million in mortgage debt. The loans provide for monthly payments of principal and interest on an amortized basis.

(c)   The Courtyard and Residence Inn hotels in Franklin Cool Springs, TN are located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $51 million and an initial deposit of $400,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

(d)   The hotels are currently under construction. The table shows the expected number of rooms upon hotel completion and the expected franchise.  Assuming all conditions to closing are met the purchase of these    hotels should close over the next 2 to 12 months from September 30, 2013.

(e)   If the seller meets all of the conditions to closing, the Company is obligated to specifically perform under the contract. As the property is under construction, at this time, the seller has not met all of the conditions to closing.

(f)    The Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites hotels in Oklahoma City, OK are part of an adjoining two-hotel complex that will be located on the same site. The two hotels are covered by the same purchase contract with a total gross purchase price of $45 million and deposits of $300,000. These amounts are reflected in the total gross purchase price and deposits paid as indicated above.

As there can be no assurance that all conditions to closing will be satisfied, the Company includes deposits paid for hotels under contract in other assets, net in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and in deposits and other disbursements for potential acquisitions in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. It is anticipated that the purchase price (less any debt assumed) for the outstanding contracts will be funded from the proceeds of the Company’s on-going best-efforts offering of Units and borrowings under the Company’s credit facility if a closing occurs.

On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase contract for the potential acquisition of an adjoining Courtyard and TownePlace Suites hotel complex under development in Grapevine, Texas. On March 18, 2013, this contract was terminated. The gross purchase price for the hotels totaled $41.7 million. In connection with the termination of this contract, the initial deposit of $50,000 was repaid to the Company.

XML

Pro Forma Information (Details) (Hotels Acquired After December 31, 2011 [Member])	21 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Hotels Acquired After December 31, 2011 [Member]
Pro Forma Information (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Hotels Opened	6
Number of Businesses Acquired	17

XML

Pro Forma Information (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Business Acquisition, Pro Forma Information [Table Text Block]

The following unaudited pro forma information for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented as if the acquisitions of the Company’s hotels acquired after December 31, 2011 had occurred on the latter of January 1, 2012 or the opening date of the hotel (six of the Company’s hotels opened after January 1, 2012). The pro forma information does not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations would actually have been if such transactions, in fact, had occurred on these applicable dates, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. Amounts are in thousands, except per share data.

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Total revenues	$	45,630	$	43,313	$	136,617	$	123,537
Net income		11,351		7,299		28,986		15,244
Net income per share - basic and diluted	$	0.15	$	0.11	$	0.40	$	0.25

XML

Subsequent Events

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events [Text Block]

10.  Subsequent Events

In October 2013, the Company declared and paid approximately $5.3 million, or $0.06875 per outstanding common share, in distributions to its common shareholders.

In October 2013, under the guidelines of the Company’s Unit Redemption Program, the Company redeemed approximately 0.6 million Units in the amount of $6.2 million, representing 100% of the requested Unit redemptions.

During October 2013, the Company closed on the issuance of approximately 0.9 million Units through its on-going best-efforts offering, representing gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $9.8 million and proceeds net of selling and marketing costs of approximately $8.8 million.

XML

Investment in Real Estate (Details) - Hotel Acquisitions (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013
Hampton Inn & Suites Huntsville, AL [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	AL
Brand	Hampton Inn & Suites
Manager	LBA
Date Acquired	3/14/2013
Rooms	98
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	$ 11,466
Home2 Suites Huntsville, AL [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	AL
Brand	Home2 Suites
Manager	LBA
Date Acquired	3/14/2013
Rooms	77
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	9,009
Marriott Fairfax, VA [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	VA
Brand	Marriott
Manager	White
Date Acquired	3/15/2013
Rooms	310
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	34,000
Residence Inn Houston, TX [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	TX
Brand	Residence Inn
Manager	Western
Date Acquired	6/7/2013
Rooms	120
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	18,000
Homewood Suites Denton, TX [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	TX
Brand	Homewood Suites
Manager	Chartwell
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	107
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	11,300
Hilton Garden Inn Maple Grove, MN [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	MN
Brand	Hilton Garden Inn
Manager	North Central
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	120
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	12,675
Homewood Suites Oklahoma City, OK [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	OK
Brand	Homewood Suites
Manager	Chartwell
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	90
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	11,500
Hampton Inn & Suites Omaha, NE [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	NE
Brand	Hampton Inn & Suites
Manager	North Central
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	139
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	19,775
Homewood Suites Omaha, NE [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	NE
Brand	Homewood Suites
Manager	North Central
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	123
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	17,625
Courtyard Phoenix, AZ [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	AZ
Brand	Courtyard
Manager	North Central
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	127
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	10,800
Hampton Inn & Suites Phoenix, AZ [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	AZ
Brand	Hampton Inn & Suites
Manager	North Central
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	125
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	8,600
Homewood Suites Phoenix, AZ [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
State	AZ
Brand	Homewood Suites
Manager	North Central
Date Acquired	7/26/2013
Rooms	134
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	12,025
Total [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Rooms	1,570
Gross Purchase Price (in Dollars)	$ 176,775

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended					33 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013 August 13, 2010 (Initial Capitalization) [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Hotels [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Aggregate Hotel Rooms [Member]	Sep. 30, 2013 Capital Raised Through On-Going Best-Efforts Offering [Member]
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) [Line Items]
Units sold at inception (in Shares)					10
Unit Description			one common share and one Series A preferred share
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Issued at inception (in Shares)					480,000
Number of Reportable Segments			1
Number of Real Estate Properties						43
Number of States in which Entity Operates						17
Number of Units in Real Estate Property							5,452
Percentage of Revenue Reserved for Replacements			up to 5%
Units Sold (in Shares)								79,500,000
Proceeds from issuance or sale of equity, gross (in Dollars)								$ 869,600,000
Proceeds from Issuance or Sale of Equity (in Dollars)			128,409,000	198,532,000				779,600,000
Offering costs, selling commissions and marketing expenses (in Dollars)								87,000,000
Offering costs, other (in Dollars)								$ 3,100,000
Weighted Average Number Diluted Shares Outstanding Adjustment (in Shares)	0	0	0	0

XML

Document And Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Nov. 01, 2013
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Apple REIT Ten, Inc.
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		76,856,889
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0001498864
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3

XML

Investment in Real Estate (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Business Combination, Acquisition Related Costs	$ 2,935,000	$ 607,000	$ 4,904,000	$ 1,541,000
Goodwill	0		0
Noncash or Part Noncash Acquisition, Debt Assumed			0	13,067,000
Payments for Deposits on Real Estate Acquisitions			1,528,000	72,000
Acquisition-related Costs [Member] | Real Estate Acquisition and Disposal Fees Incurred [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Costs and Expenses, Related Party			3,500,000
Acquisition-related Costs [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Business Combination, Acquisition Related Costs			4,900,000
Real estate acquisition and disposal fee, Related Party, Percent			2.00%
Business Combination, Other Acquisition Related Costs			1,400,000
Hotels [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Real Estate Properties	43		43
Number of States in which Entity Operates	17		17
Apple Suites Realty Group (ASRG) [Member] | Chairman and CEO of Company [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Related person ownership of related parties			100.00%
Hotel Acquisitions [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Businesses Acquired			12
Business Combination, Acquisition Related Costs			4,800,000
Business Combination, Pro Forma Information, Revenue of Acquiree since Acquisition Date, Actual			14,900,000
Business Combination, Pro Forma Information, Operating Income (Expense) of Acquiree since Acquisition Date, Actual			2,200,000
Phoenix, Arizona Hampton Inn & Suites and Homewood Suites [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Land Leases			2
Lessee Leasing Arrangements, Operating Leases, Term of Contract			87 years
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Off-market Lease, Favorable, Gross	600,000		600,000
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	16,000,000		16,000,000
Potential Purchase of Additional Hotels [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Potential Number of Hotel Properties	7		7
Business Acquisition, Gross Purchase Price	155,900,000		155,900,000
Number of Potential Hotel Properties Under Construction	4		4
Hotel construction, time to completion			two to 12 months
Number of Potential Hotel Properties Operating	3		3
Existing Hotels, time to acquisition			within the next three months
Potential Purchase of Colorado Springs and Franklin Cool Springs Hotels [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Noncash or Part Noncash Acquisition, Debt Assumed			38,800,000
Potential Franklin Cool Springs Courtyard and Residence Inn Hotels [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Potential Number of Hotel Properties	2		2
Business Acquisition, Gross Purchase Price	51,000,000		51,000,000
Payments for Deposits on Real Estate Acquisitions			400,000
Potential Oklahoma City Hilton Garden Inn and Homewood Suites [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Potential Number of Hotel Properties	2		2
Business Acquisition, Gross Purchase Price	45,000,000		45,000,000
Payments for Deposits on Real Estate Acquisitions			300,000
Termination of Potential Courtyard and TownPlace Suites [Member]
Investment in Real Estate (Details) [Line Items]
Terminated Purchase Contract, Purchase Price			41,700,000
Return of Deposit on Purchase Contract			$ 50,000