XML 32 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 7  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined on the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The standard establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring assets or liabilities at fair value. Market price observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the asset or liability. Assets or liabilities with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree or judgment used in measuring fair value.

The following table presents the fair value measurement hierarchy levels required under ASC 820 for each of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

(In thousands)

    

Total

    

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

    

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

    

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

    

Total

    

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

    

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

    

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

$

18

 

$

18

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

75,027

 

$

75,027

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants

 

 

307,760

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

307,760

 

 

366,080

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

366,080

Interest rate swaps

 

 

4,217

 

 

 —

 

 

4,217

 

 

 —

 

 

3,144

 

 

 —

 

 

3,144

 

 

 —

Cash equivalents consist of registered money market mutual funds which invest in United States treasury securities that are valued at the net asset value of the underlying shares in the funds as of the close of business at the end of each period.

The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves.

The valuation of warrants is based on an option pricing valuation model, utilizing inputs which are classified as Level 3 due to the unavailability of comparable market data. The following table presents a rollforward of the valuation of our Sponsor and Management Warrants:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 

 

(In thousands)

   

2015

   

2014

   

2013

 

Beginning of year

 

$

366,080

 

$

305,560

 

$

123,573

 

Warrant liability (gain) loss (a)

 

 

(58,320)

 

 

60,520

 

 

181,987

 

End of year

 

$

307,760

 

$

366,080

 

$

305,560

 


(a)

All (gains) and losses during 2015, 2014, and 2013, were unrealized. Changes in the fair value of the Sponsor Warrants and the Management Warrants are recognized in net income as a warrant liability gain or loss.

The inputs to the valuation model include the fair value of stock related to the warrants, exercise price and term of the warrants, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield and, with respect to the Management Warrants, a discount for lack of marketability. An increase in expected volatility would increase the fair value of the liability, while a decrease in expected volatility would decrease the fair value of the liability. As the period of restriction lapses, the marketability discount reduces to zero and increases the fair value of the warrants.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our warrants, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unobservable Inputs

 

    

Expected
Volatility (a)

    

Marketability
Discount (b)

December 31, 2015

 

 

27.4%

 

10.0% - 12.0%

December 31, 2014

 

 

24.5%

 

18.0% - 20.0%


(a)

Based on our implied equity volatility.

(b)

Represents the discount rate for lack of marketability of the Management Warrants which decreases as the current date approaches the dates of contractual expiration of the marketability restrictions.

The estimated fair values of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

Fair Value Hierarchy

    

Carrying
Amount

    

Estimated
Fair Value

    

Carrying
Amount

    

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

Level 1

 

$

445,283

 

$

445,283

 

$

485,424

 

$

485,424

 

Notes receivable, net (a)

Level 3

 

 

1,664

 

 

1,664

 

 

28,630

 

 

28,630

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed-rate debt

Level 2

 

$

1,141,381

 

$

1,137,166

 

$

1,030,554

 

$

1,050,333

 

Variable-rate debt

Level 2

 

 

1,314,973

 

 

1,314,973

 

 

962,916

 

 

962,916

 


(a)

Notes receivable is shown net of an allowance of $0.2 million and $0.5 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Notes receivable are carried at net realizable value which approximates fair value. The estimated fair values are based on certain factors, such as current interest rates, terms of the note and credit worthiness of the borrower.

The fair value of fixed-rate debt in the table above, not including our Senior Notes (as defined in Note 8 – Mortgages, Notes and Loans Payable), was estimated based on a discounted future cash payment model, which includes risk premiums and a risk free rate derived from the current London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or U.S. Treasury obligation interest rates. The discount rates reflect our judgment as to what the approximate current lending rates for loans or groups of loans with similar maturities and credit quality would be if credit markets were operating efficiently and assuming that the debt is outstanding through maturity. The fair value of our Senior Notes, included in fixed rate debt in the table above, was estimated based upon its most recent trade price.

The carrying amounts for our variable-rate debt approximate fair value given that the interest rates are variable and adjust with current market rates for instruments with similar risks and maturities.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximate fair value because of the short‑term maturity of these instruments.