XML 35 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Impairment
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Impairment and Intangibles [Abstract]  
IMPAIRMENT
NOTE 4 IMPAIRMENT

General

Although there were no impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2011, Park West continues to suffer from a weak market and its occupancy was 64.9% at December 31, 2011. We are focused on attracting tenants who can drive increased traffic during the day and evening, such as entertainment concepts. If we are unsuccessful at increasing occupancy and traffic, many of our existing tenants may be unable to continue to occupy their leased spaces because their sales volume will likely be inadequate to support their operating costs, which would reduce our expected cash flows and result in a significant impairment. Impairment charges totaled $503.4 million and $680.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, as presented in the table below. These impairment provisions resulted from an evaluation of impairment indicators for our properties, including considerations of revised strategies and operating philosophies and, with properties with such indicators, the undiscounted cash flows of the projects as compared to their carrying values. At December 31, 2010, although an additional four regions or projects within our master planned communities segment and four additional operating properties had carrying values in excess of estimated fair values based on current occupancy levels, cash flow and use of the property, no additional provisions for impairment were considered necessary for such projects and properties. These impairment charges are included in provisions for impairment in our consolidated and combined statement of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Circle T also recorded impairment charges of $38.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 relating to the assets of our non-consolidated Real Estate Affiliates, of which our share was $19.0 million, and which was included in our Equity in income (loss) from Real Estate Affiliates. In addition to the impairment charges recorded by the Circle T venture, we recorded impairment charges related to our investment in Circle T of $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to write these investments down to their estimated fair value, with such provisions reflected in our Equity in earnings (loss) from Real Estate Affiliates. No provisions for impairment were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 related to our investments in Real Estate Affiliates.

 

Summary of all impairment provisions:

 

                         
            Year Ended
December 31,
 

Impaired Asset

 

Location

 

Method of Determining Fair Value

  2010     2009  
            (In thousands)  

Master Planned Communities:

                       

Maryland- Gateway

  Howard County, MD  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)

  $ 2,613     $ —    

Maryland- Columbia

  Columbia, MD  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)

    56,798       —    

Maryland- Fairwood

  Columbia, MD  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)

    —         52,767  

Summerlin-South

  Las Vegas, NV  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)

    345,920       —    
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
              405,331       52,767  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Assets:

                       

Landmark

  Alexandria, VA  

Discounted cash flow analysis (a) (c)

    24,434       27,323  

Riverwalk Marketplace

  New Orleans, LA  

Discounted cash flow analysis (c)

    55,975       —    

Various pre-development costs

      (b)     514       23,641  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
              80,923       50,964  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 

Strategic Developments:

                       

Allen

  Allen, TX  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)

    —         29,063  

Cottonwood Mall

  Holladay, UT  

Comparable property market analysis

    —         50,768  

Kendall

  Miami, FL  

Projected sales price analysis (c)

    —         35,089  

West Windsor

  Princeton, NJ  

Projected sales price analysis (c)

    —         22,260  

Bridges at Mint Hill

  Charlotte, NC  

Projected sales price analysis (b)

    —         16,636  

Elk Grove Promenade

  Elk Grove, CA  

Projected sales price analysis (c)

    —         175,280  

The Shops at Summerlin Centre

  Las Vegas, NV  

Projected sales price analysis (c)

    —         176,141  

Century Plaza Mall

  Birmingham, AL  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (d)

    12,899       —    

Redlands Promenade

  Redlands, CA  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)

    —         6,667  

Village at Redlands

  Redlands, CA  

Projected sales price analysis (a) (b)

    —         5,537  

Nouvelle at Natick

  Natick, MA  

Discounted cash flow analysis (c)

    4,135       55,923  

Various pre-development costs

      (b)     68       3,254  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
              17,102       576,618  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

Total provisions for impairment

          $ 503,356     $ 680,349  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

Real Estate Affiliates (REA):

                       

The Shops at Circle T Ranch

  Dallas, TX   Projected sales price analysis (d)   $ —       $ 17,062  

Circle T Power Center

  Dallas, TX   Projected sales price analysis (d)     —         21,020  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total provisions for impairment on property held by REA

      $ —       $ 38,082  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

The Shops at Circle T Ranch

  Dallas, TX       $ —       $ 8,531  

Circle T Power Center

  Dallas, TX         —         10,510  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total provisions for impairment on property held by REA at share

      $ —       $ 19,041  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

Impairment of Circle T investment (e)

          $ —       $ 10,600  
           

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) Projected sales price analysis incorporates available market information and other management assumptions.
(b) Related to the write down of various pre-development costs that were determined to be non-recoverable due to the related projects being terminated.
(c) These impairments were primarily driven by the carrying value of the assets, including costs expected to be incurred, not being recoverable by the projected sales price of such assets.
(d) These impairments were primarily driven by management’s changes in current plans with respect to the property and measured based on the value of the underlying land, which is based on comparable property market analysis or a projected sales price analysis that incorporates available market information and other management assumptions as these properties are either no longer operational or operating with no or nominal income.
(e) Reflected in our equity in earnings (loss) of Real Estate Affiliates.