XML 65 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 7                         FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels required under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 Fair Value Measurement, our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Total

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Total

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

 

(In thousands)

(In thousands)

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

$

200,014

$

200,014

$

$

$

$

$

$

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants

444,680

444,680

305,560

305,560

Interest rate swaps

3,195

3,195

4,164

4,164

Cash equivalents consist primarily of two registered money market mutual funds which invest in United States treasury securities that are valued at the net asset value of the underlying shares in the funds as of the close of business at the end of each period. The fair value approximates carrying value.

The valuation of warrants is based on an option pricing valuation model. The inputs to the model include the fair value of the stock related to the warrants, exercise price of the warrants, term, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield and with respect to the Management Warrants, a discount for lack of marketability.

The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) which are our Sponsors and Management Warrants:

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance as of January 1,

$

305,560

$

123,573

Warrant liability loss

139,120

148,706

Balance as of September 30,

$

444,680

$

272,279

 

The fair values were estimated using an option pricing model and Level 3 inputs due to the unavailability of comparable market data. Changes in the fair value of the Sponsors Warrants and the Management Warrants are recognized in earnings as a warrant liability gain or loss.

Significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our warrants designated as Level 3 as of September 30, 2014 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Unobservable Inputs

 

 

 

 

Valuation

 

Expected

 

Marketability

 

 

Fair Value

 

Technique

 

Volatility (a)

 

Discount (b)

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Option Pricing

 

 

Warrants

$

444,680

Valuation Model

23.0

%

20.0% - 22.0%

 

 

(a)     Based on our implied equity volatility.

(b)     Represents the discount rate for lack of marketability of the Management Warrants. The discount rates ranged from 29.0%-30.0% at December 31, 2013.

The expected volatility and marketability discount in the table above are significant unobservable inputs used to estimate the fair value of our warrant liabilities. An increase in expected volatility would increase the fair value of the liability, while a decrease in expected volatility would decrease the fair value of the liability. As the period of restriction lapses, the marketability discount reduces to zero and increases the fair value of the warrants.

The estimated fair values of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (a)

$

605,592

$

605,592

$

894,948

$

894,948

Notes receivable, net

12,724

12,724

20,554

20,554

Tax indemnity receivable, including interest

333,877

(b

)

320,494

(b

)

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Fixed-rate debt

$

956,739

$

979,836

$

971,786

$

1,012,461

Variable-rate debt (c)

899,623

899,623

509,737

509,737

SID bonds

24,554

24,399

33,100

32,837

Total mortgages, notes and loans payable

$

1,880,916

$

1,903,858

$

1,514,623

$

1,555,035

 

(a)     Consists of bank deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less.

(b)     It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the tax indemnity receivable, including interest, as the timing and ultimate amount received under the agreement is highly dependent on numerous future events that cannot be reliably predicted.

(c)     $172.0 million of variable-rate debt has been swapped to a fixed rate for the term of the related debt.

Notes receivable are carried at net realizable value, which approximates fair value. The estimated fair values of these notes receivable are categorized as Level 3 due to certain factors, such as current interest rates, terms of the note and credit worthiness of the borrower.

The fair value of debt in the table above, not including our Senior Notes (as defined below), was estimated based on a discounted future cash payment model using Level 2 inputs, which includes risk premiums for loans of comparable quality and a risk free rate derived from the current London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or U.S. Treasury obligation interest rates. The discount rates reflect our judgment as to what the approximate current lending rates for loans or groups of loans with similar maturities and credit quality would be if credit markets were operating efficiently and assuming that the debt is outstanding through maturity.

The fair value of our Senior Notes included in Fixed-rate debt in the table above was estimated based on quoted market prices for similar issues.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.