XML 89 R34.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
IMPAIRMENT (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
IMPAIRMENT  
Schedule of Impairment Provisions and Fair Value Measurements

 

 

Impaired Asset
  Location   Method of Determining Fair Value   Total Fair Value
Measurement
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
  Total Loss
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
 
   
   
  (In thousands)
 

Master Planned Communities:

                       

Maryland – Gateway (e)

    Howard County, MD   Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)   $ 1,649   $ 2,613  

Maryland – Columbia (e)

    Columbia, MD   Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)     34,823     56,798  

Summerlin – South (e)

    Las Vegas, NV   Projected sales price analysis (a) (c)     203,325     345,920  
                     

 

              239,797     405,331  
                     

Operating Assets:

                       

Landmark (e)

    Alexandria, VA   Discounted cash flow analysis (a) (c)     23,750     24,434  

Riverwalk Marketplace (g)

    New Orleans, LA   Discounted cash flow analysis (c)     10,179     55,975  

Various pre-development costs

        (b)     —       514  
                     

 

              33,929     80,923  
                     

Strategic Developments:

                       

Century Plaza Mall (f)

    Birmingham, AL   Projected sales price analysis (a) (d)     4,500     12,899  

Nouvelle at Natick (e)

    Natick, MA   Discounted cash flow analysis (c)     13,413     4,135  

Various pre-development costs

        (b)     —       68  
                     

 

              17,913     17,102  
                     

Total

            $ 291,639   $ 503,356  
                     

(a)
Projected sales price analysis incorporates available market information and other management assumptions.
(b)
Related to the write-down of various pre-development costs that were determined to be non-recoverable due to the related projects being terminated.
(c)
These impairments were primarily driven by the carrying value of the assets, including costs expected to be incurred, not being recoverable by the projected sales price of such assets.
(d)
These impairments were primarily driven by management's changes in current plans with respect to the property and measured based on the value of the underlying land, which is based on comparable property market analysis or a projected sales price analysis that incorporates available market information and other management assumptions as these properties are either no longer operational or operating with no or nominal income.
(e)
The fair value was calculated on a discounted cash flow analysis using a discount rate of 20.0%.
(f)
The fair value is based on estimated sales value.
(g)
The fair value was calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis using a property specific discount rate and a residual capitalization rate of 8.5% for both computations.