COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Pending or Threatened Litigation –From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. The Company has been named as a defendant in three securities class action complaints filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada: Yilan Shi v. Paysign, Inc. et al., filed on March 19, 2020 (“Shi”), Lorna Chase v. Paysign, Inc. et al., filed on March 25, 2020 (“Chase”), and Smith & Duvall v. Paysign, Inc. et al., filed on April 2, 2020 (collectively, the “Complaints” or “Securities Class Action”). Smith & Duvall v. Paysign, Inc. et al. was voluntarily dismissed on May 21, 2020. On May 18, 2020, the Shi plaintiffs and another entity called the Paysign Investor Group each filed a motion to consolidate the remaining Shi and Chase actions and to be appointed lead plaintiff. The Complaints are putative class actions filed on behalf of a class of persons who acquired the Company’s common stock from March 19, 2019 through March 31, 2020, inclusive. The Complaints generally allege that the Company, Mark R. Newcomer, and Mark Attinger violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and that Messrs. Newcomer and Attinger violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, by making materially false or misleading statements, or failing to disclose material facts, regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and its financial statements. The Complaints seek class action certification, compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. On December 2, 2020, the Court consolidated Shi and Chase as In re Paysign, Inc. Securities Litigation and appointed the Paysign Investor Group as lead plaintiff. On January 12, 2021, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint in the consolidated action. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on March 15, 2021. On February 9, 2023, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. On May 22, 2023, Defendants filed an Answer to the Amended Complaint. On December 15, 2023, the parties agreed in principle to a proposed settlement of the Securities Class Action and Plaintiffs filed a Consented Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. On January 4, 2024, the Court preliminarily approved a settlement in the amount of $3,750,000, the entirety of which came from the Company’s directors-and-officers insurance policy, for the referenced class of purchasers, and scheduled a final approval hearing for April 17, 2024. The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in four stockholder derivative actions currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The first-filed derivative action is entitled Andrzej Toczek, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark R. Newcomer, et al. and was filed on September 17, 2020. This action alleges violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste, largely in connection with the failure to correct information technology controls over financial reporting alleged in the Securities Class Action, thereby causing the Company to face exposure in the Securities Class Action. The complaint also alleges insider trading violations against certain individual defendants. The second-filed derivative action is entitled John K. Gray, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark Attinger, et al. and was filed on May 9, 2022. This action involves the same alleged conduct raised in the Toczek action and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with financial reporting, breach of fiduciary duty in connection with alleged insider trading against certain individual defendants, and unjust enrichment. On June 3, 2022, the Court approved a stipulation staying the action until the Court in the consolidated Securities Class Action issued a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. On May 10, 2023, the Toczek and Gray actions were consolidated. The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in a third stockholder derivative action initially filed in state court in Clark County, Nevada, on October 2, 2023, entitled Simone Blanchette, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark Newcomer, et al, which the defendants subsequently removed to federal district court in Nevada pursuant to a Notice of Removal filed on October 10, 2023. That complaint makes substantially the same allegations as made in the consolidated Toczek and Gray actions, and also contains a claim that the individual defendants violated Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On December 7, 2023, the parties requested that the action be stayed for sixty days due to the settlement negotiations in the consolidated Toczek and Gray actions, and the Court granted the sixty-day stay on December 11, 2023. On January 29, 2024, the parties agreed to an additional sixty-day extension, to March 29, 2024, and the Court entered an Order thereon on February 2, 2024. On or before the end of that period, the parties are to provide the Court with an updated joint status report or inform the Court if the settlement of the consolidated derivative action does not proceed. The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in a fourth stockholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, filed on December 27, 2023, entitled Mo Jeewa, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark R. Newcomer, et al. That complaint makes substantially the same allegations as made in the consolidated Toczek and Gray actions and the Blanchette action discussed above, and alleges breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. If the derivative cases do not settle, it is the Company’s intention to file motions to dismiss. As of the date of this filing, the Company cannot give any meaningful estimate of likely outcome or damages.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2023

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Pending or Threatened Litigation –From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

The Company has been named as a defendant in three securities class action complaints filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada: Yilan Shi v. Paysign, Inc. et al., filed on March 19, 2020 (“Shi”), Lorna Chase v. Paysign, Inc. et al., filed on March 25, 2020 (“Chase”), and Smith & Duvall v. Paysign, Inc. et al., filed on April 2, 2020 (collectively, the “Complaints” or “Securities Class Action”). Smith & Duvall v. Paysign, Inc. et al. was voluntarily dismissed on May 21, 2020. On May 18, 2020, the Shi plaintiffs and another entity called the Paysign Investor Group each filed a motion to consolidate the remaining Shi and Chase actions and to be appointed lead plaintiff. The Complaints are putative class actions filed on behalf of a class of persons who acquired the Company’s common stock from March 19, 2019 through March 31, 2020, inclusive. The Complaints generally allege that the Company, Mark R. Newcomer, and Mark Attinger violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and that Messrs. Newcomer and Attinger violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, by making materially false or misleading statements, or failing to disclose material facts, regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and its financial statements. The Complaints seek class action certification, compensatory damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. On December 2, 2020, the Court consolidated Shi and Chase as In re Paysign, Inc. Securities Litigation and appointed the Paysign Investor Group as lead plaintiff. On January 12, 2021, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint in the consolidated action. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on March 15, 2021. On February 9, 2023, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. On May 22, 2023, Defendants filed an Answer to the Amended Complaint. On December 15, 2023, the parties agreed in principle to a proposed settlement of the Securities Class Action and Plaintiffs filed a Consented Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. On January 4, 2024, the Court preliminarily approved a settlement in the amount of $3,750,000, the entirety of which came from the Company’s directors-and-officers insurance policy, for the referenced class of purchasers, and scheduled a final approval hearing for April 17, 2024.

The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in four stockholder derivative actions currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The first-filed derivative action is entitled Andrzej Toczek, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark R. Newcomer, et al. and was filed on September 17, 2020. This action alleges violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste, largely in connection with the failure to correct information technology controls over financial reporting alleged in the Securities Class Action, thereby causing the Company to face exposure in the Securities Class Action. The complaint also alleges insider trading violations against certain individual defendants. The second-filed derivative action is entitled John K. Gray, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark Attinger, et al. and was filed on May 9, 2022. This action involves the same alleged conduct raised in the Toczek action and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with financial reporting, breach of fiduciary duty in connection with alleged insider trading against certain individual defendants, and unjust enrichment. On June 3, 2022, the Court approved a stipulation staying the action until the Court in the consolidated Securities Class Action issued a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. On May 10, 2023, the Toczek and Gray actions were consolidated.

The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in a third stockholder derivative action initially filed in state court in Clark County, Nevada, on October 2, 2023, entitled Simone Blanchette, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark Newcomer, et al, which the defendants subsequently removed to federal district court in Nevada pursuant to a Notice of Removal filed on October 10, 2023. That complaint makes substantially the same allegations as made in the consolidated Toczek and Gray actions, and also contains a claim that the individual defendants violated Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On December 7, 2023, the parties requested that the action be stayed for sixty days due to the settlement negotiations in the consolidated Toczek and Gray actions, and the Court granted the sixty-day stay on December 11, 2023. On January 29, 2024, the parties agreed to an additional sixty-day extension, to March 29, 2024, and the Court entered an Order thereon on February 2, 2024. On or before the end of that period, the parties are to provide the Court with an updated joint status report or inform the Court if the settlement of the consolidated derivative action does not proceed.

The Company has also been named as a nominal defendant in a fourth stockholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, filed on December 27, 2023, entitled Mo Jeewa, derivatively on behalf of Paysign, Inc. v. Mark R. Newcomer, et al. That complaint makes substantially the same allegations as made in the consolidated Toczek and Gray actions and the Blanchette action discussed above, and alleges breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.

If the derivative cases do not settle, it is the Company’s intention to file motions to dismiss. As of the date of this filing, the Company cannot give any meaningful estimate of likely outcome or damages.