XML 30 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Fair Value Measurement
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement

Note 4. Fair Value Measurement

The Company follows a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

 

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, debt instruments and certain warrants. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had not elected the fair value option for any financial assets and liabilities for which such an election would have been permitted, and the only outstanding financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were the wholly-funded warrants reported as a financial instrument obligation as of December 31, 2018. The following is a summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

 

 

September 30, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Reported

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Reported

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Financial Assets and Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

7,037

 

 

$

7,037

 

 

$

7,078

 

 

$

7,078

 

Revolving credit facility

 

$

26,561

 

 

$

26,561

 

 

$

37,385

 

 

$

37,385

 

Financial instrument obligation

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,848

 

 

$

7,848

 

Contingent consideration liabilities

 

$

1,529

 

 

$

1,529

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

Cash equivalents are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value as of the consolidated balance sheet dates, due to the short period of time to maturity; and accounts receivable and accounts payable are stated at their carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short time to the expected receipt or payment. The carrying value of the revolving credit facility equals fair value as the stated interest rate approximates market rates currently available to the Company, which are considered Level 2 inputs. The liability-classified warrants reported as a financial instrument obligation were classified within Level 3 because the Company uses a Black-Scholes pricing model to estimate the fair value based on inputs that are not observable in any market.

 

Contingent consideration liabilities are measured at their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition, with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company estimated the contingent consideration liability using a Monte Carlo simulation which required the Company to make estimates and assumptions regarding expected volatilities, discount rates, and future revenues of the acquired business, which are considered Level 3 inputs.