N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY

Investment Company Act file number 811-22465

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

4265 SAN FELIPE, 8^TH FLOOR, HOUSTON, TX 77027

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

With a copy to:

John A. Blaisdell	George J. Zornada
The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.	K & L Gates LLP
4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor	State Street Financial Center
Houston, TX 77027	One Lincoln St.
(Name and address of agent for service)	Boston, MA 02111-2950
	(617) 261-3231

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 800-725-9456

Date of fiscal year end: 12/31/13

Date of reporting period: 12/31/13

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.
THE ENDOWMENT FUND®
Shareholder’s Report
December 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.
Management Discussion of Fund Performance (Unaudited)	1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	4
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Partners’ Capital	5
Statement of Operations	6
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital	7
Statement of Cash Flows	8
Notes to Financial Statements	9
Supplemental Information (Unaudited)	16
Privacy Policy (Unaudited)	24
The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	26
Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Partners’ Capital	27
Schedule of Investments	28
Statement of Operations	37
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital	38
Statement of Cash Flows	39
Notes to Financial Statements	40
Supplemental Information (Unaudited)	64
Privacy Policy (Unaudited)	71

Dear TEF Partners:

It has been an eventful year for The Endowment Fund (the “Fund”)¹ and for the core alternative strategies it accesses on behalf of investors. We hope to achieve a few objectives with this letter. First, we will provide an update on the performance of the Fund. Second, we will provide an update on our views of the environment for the Fund and its strategies in 2014 and beyond.

Recall that the goal of The Endowment Fund is to generate a high-quality return stream that targets approximately half the historical volatility of equities (8% target standard deviation) with very low correlation to traditional stocks and bonds. While we believe the reduced volatility and focus on diversification from traditional assets remain critical, both features were undeniably important headwinds in an equity-dominated 2013.

Investment Performance in 2013

The Endowment Registered Fund returned 3.7% in calendar 2013, including 4.1% in a comparatively strong fourth quarter. While performance was modestly positive, performance in different areas of the Fund varied significantly, consistent with the behavior of markets more broadly.^

Domestic Equity and Private Equity exposures led returns for 2013, contributing 1.5% and 2.1% to the Fund’s performance respectively. (As a reminder, performance contribution is calculated by multiplying the return of the asset class by its allocation within the portfolio.) This contribution to performance comes despite the relatively limited exposure to public equities over this time period, consistent with the approach to provide exposure to investments that diversify, rather than augment, exposures to global equity markets. This is largely the result of tremendous returns for equity market indices, especially the S&P 500, which led major large cap markets with a 32.4% return for 2013.^

Other core market exposures were less successful in 2013, including Traditional Fixed Income and Natural Resources. As mentioned in previous letters, fixed income weakened particularly in May and June of 2013 as a result of initial indications of a pullback in quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, although those moves did not ultimately transpire until very late in the year. Given the Fund’s emphasis on diversifying away from equities in particular, this position in Traditional Fixed Income was a notable headwind. In addition, however, despite the

¹ The Endowment Fund has a variety of feeders, which all feed into a single “master” fund called The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. Each “feeder” fund has different expense ratios, which provide for slightly different returns from one “feeder” fund to the next. Accordingly, unless otherwise specified, the returns outlined herein are those of The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., which is the largest “feeder” fund in The Endowment Fund complex. Your returns may vary, based on the feeder in which you invest and the timing of your investment. Please consult your capital account statement for the exact returns of your investment.

^ Portfolio composition is subject to change.

1

strong environment for many growth assets, Natural Resources, in particular driven by weakness in commodities prices, was a meaningful negative contributor, reducing Fund returns by 1.0% for the year.^

Hedge fund strategies in the Global Opportunistic category were modest positive contributors, at 0.8%, with strong contributions from more macro- and trading-oriented strategies. In contrast, Arbitrage Strategies, which typically seek market neutral exposure focused on cross-security or cross-capital structure trades, performed poorly, reducing returns by 1.2%. A substantial portion of weakness in Arbitrage Strategies can be attributed to challenges faced by traditional hedging strategies employed by these managers; given their predisposition to hedge market exposure to remain market neutral, many utilize short positions in the S&P 500, one of the most liquid markets, to offset the market exposure from their long positions. Given the dominance of this U.S. Equity index over the year, these hedges were often a meaningful detractor from performance for hedge funds in the Arbitrage Strategies category.^

Economic Overview

More than ever following a year where investing domestically was so profitable for U.S.-based investors, we believe that “global” remains the operative word for 2014. The forces that drive investment returns, namely the behaviors and risk preferences of investors, are human forces, whether one is discussing sovereign debt in emerging Eastern Europe or small cap stocks here in the U.S.

Understanding the narratives which guide investor behaviors is important, but we believe that starting from a foundation of true diversification among the drivers of investment returns remains key. Thus, we believe that shrewd investing starts from a place of humility, introducing views only where we believe we know something of value that should change our positioning. Here is what we know:

• U.S. Equity Dominance: The U.S. led developed markets in 2013 with a 32.4% return while emerging markets lagged considerably, posting a -2.6% return for the year.

• Low Rates Anchored: Low growth rates, low inflation rates and persistent unemployment have kept short term interest rates in core markets anchored at or near zero.

2

^ Portfolio composition is subject to change.

• Rising Rates Already Discounted: In the U.S., markets have already priced in a significant expectation of rising rates into forward curves.

Based on what we know, here is what we think:

• Emerging over Developed: We favor emerging equity versus developed equity markets as they approach a 40% discount to developed markets based on P/E multiples. Growing consensus against emerging markets serves only to increase our conviction.

• U.S. Valuations Not Extreme: Despite the recent outperformance of U.S. equity markets, they do not appear expensive versus other developed equity markets based upon either price to earnings or enterprise value to trailing 12-month EBITDA.

• Rally is Old but Supported: Positive sentiment provides a contrarian indicator as we approach the five-year mark of the current bull market; however, it seems unlikely that policy makers would stand idle should the threats of the financial crisis resurface. This may, in our view, place limits on the severity of any market correction this year.

• Still Opportunities in Sovereign Debt: The sovereign debt of Latin American issuers and other resourced-based economies like Australia and New Zealand looks attractive as investors are compensated for higher inflation with higher real yields. Furthermore, the secular growth outlooks and structural underpinnings bolster the credit quality of these countries.

• Corporate Debt Concerns: We think any meaningful rise in interest rates may be contemporaneous with a counter-cyclical widening of spreads. The low absolute yield levels of corporate debt issues are justifiable based on the low interest rate environment and historically low default rates; however, we believe the combination of spread compression and low interest rates renders them more vulnerable to rising rates than duration measures suggest.

• Closer to Home: Energy infrastructure remains a favorite theme as domestic oil production has increased by 30% since 2008 and the breakdown between Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude prices reveals logistical impediments in the current architecture of the global energy supply chain.

We believe that The Endowment Fund is particularly well-positioned to benefit from three main characteristics going forward. First, we believe that emphasizing results that are driven by skill, diversification and premia like illiquidity are important to generating full cycle results that are not as sensitive to capital market returns, for which we have more limited potential return expectations on a going-forward basis. Second, we believe that maintaining investment in a mature private investments portfolio, which The Endowment Fund allows, may avoid many of the risks and pitfalls of new investments in multi-asset private portfolios. Finally, we believe that providing access to exclusive top-tier hedge funds, unique early stage hedge funds and co-investment opportunities allows the delivery of focused, diversifying exposures to core alternatives that are not as dependent on the rising and falling waves of the market.

We thank you for your continued support. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our service desk at 1-800-725-9456.

Kindest Regards,

Endowment Advisers, L.P.²

² This letter is provided solely for informational purposes and is exclusively intended for use by existing Fund investors and/or pre-qualified prospective Fund investors with whom the Fund or an authorized intermediary acting on behalf of the Fund has a pre-existing substantive relationship. No other distribution or use of this newsletter has been authorized. Neither this letter nor the information contained therein constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. Any offering or solicitation will be made only to eligible investors and pursuant to the current version of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum and other governing documents, all of which must be read in their entirety.

3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners and Board of Directors

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities and partners’ capital of The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “Institutional TEI Fund W”) as of December 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in partners’ capital for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the three-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Institutional TEI Fund W’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. as of December 31, 2013, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its partners’ capital for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the three-year period then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio

March 1, 2014

4

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

December 31, 2013

Assets
Investment in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, at fair value	$	15,454,563
Receivable from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		4,872,640
Prepaids and other assets		4,249
Total assets		20,331,452
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Withdrawals payable		4,872,640
Payable to Adviser		25,355
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		25,887
Total liabilities		4,923,882
Partners’ capital		15,407,570
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	20,331,452

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statement of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Net investment loss allocated from the Offshore Institutional W Fund:
Dividend income	$	80,206
Interest income		12,462
Dividend income from affiliated investments		36,936
Interest income from affiliated investments		1,538
Expenses		(346,017	)
Net investment loss allocated from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		(214,875	)
Expenses of the Institutional TEI W Fund:
Printing fees		15,329
Professional fees		30,689
Regulatory filing fees		19,648
Total expenses of the Institutional TEI W Fund		65,666
Net investment loss of the Institutional TEI W Fund		(280,541	)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investments allocated from the Offshore Institutional W Fund:
Net realized gain from investments		897,918
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments		166,166
Net realized and unrealized gain from investments allocated from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		1,064,084
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations	$	783,543

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013

Partners’ capital at December 31, 2011	$	26,364,056
Contributions		5,530,816
Withdrawals		(9,767,287	)
Early repurchase fees		30,000
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations:
Net investment loss		(415,982	)
Net realized gain from investments		2,032,664
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments		(1,163,684	)
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations		452,998
Partners’ capital at December 31, 2012		22,610,583
Contributions		239,501
Withdrawals		(8,226,057	)
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations:
Net investment loss		(280,541	)
Net realized gain from investments		897,918
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments		166,166
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations		783,543
Partners’ capital at December 31, 2013	$	15,407,570

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

7

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations	$	783,543
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net realized and unrealized gain from investments allocated from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		(1,064,084	)
Net investment loss allocated from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		214,875
Contributions to the Offshore Institutional W Fund		(239,501	)
Redemptions from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		8,287,866
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivable from the Offshore Institutional W Fund		(3,642,750	)
Prepaids and other assets		(4,249	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		8,106
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,343,806
Cash flows from financing activities:
Contributions		239,501
Withdrawals		(4,583,307	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(4,343,806	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		—
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	—

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

8

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2013

(1) ORGANIZATION

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “Institutional TEI W Fund”), a Delaware limited partnership registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), commenced operations on January 1, 2011, as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Institutional TEI W Fund was created to serve as a feeder fund for The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, Ltd. (the “Offshore Institutional W Fund”), which in turn is a feeder fund for The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. (the “Master Fund”). For convenience, reference to the Institutional TEI W Fund may include the Offshore Institutional W Fund and Master Fund, as the context requires.

The Institutional TEI W Fund’s investment objective is to preserve capital and to generate consistent long-term appreciation and returns across a market cycle (which is estimated to be five to seven years). The Institutional TEI W Fund pursues its investment objective by investing substantially all of its assets in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, which in turn invests substantially all of its assets in the Master Fund, which has the same investment objectives as the Offshore Institutional W Fund and the Institutional TEI W Fund. The Master Fund invests its assets in a variety of investment vehicles including but not limited to limited partnerships, limited liability companies, offshore corporations and other foreign investment vehicles (collectively, the “Investment Funds”), registered investment companies (including exchange-traded funds) and direct investments in marketable securities and derivative instruments. The Master Fund’s financial statements, Schedule of Investments and notes to financial statements, included elsewhere in this report, should be read in conjunction with this report. The Offshore Institutional W Fund serves solely as an intermediary for the Institutional TEI W Fund’s investment in the Master Fund. The percentage of the Master Fund’s partnership interests indirectly owned by the Institutional TEI W Fund on December 31, 2013, was 0.75%.

The Endowment Fund GP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, serves as the general partner of the Institutional TEI W Fund (the “General Partner”). To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the General Partner has irrevocably delegated to a board of directors (the “Board” and each member a “Director”) its rights and powers to monitor and oversee the business affairs of the Institutional TEI W Fund, including the complete and exclusive authority to oversee and establish policies regarding the management, conduct, and operation of the Institutional TEI W Fund’s business. A majority of the members of the Board are independent of the General Partner and its management. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board may delegate any of its rights, powers and authority to, among others, the officers of the Institutional TEI W Fund, the Adviser, or any committee of the Board.

The Board is authorized to engage an investment adviser and it has selected Endowment Advisers, L.P. (the “Adviser”), to manage the Institutional TEI W Fund’s portfolio and operations, pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Investment Management Agreement”). The Adviser is a Delaware limited partnership that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser is responsible for the establishment of an investment committee, which is responsible for developing, implementing, and supervising the Institutional TEI W Fund’s investment program subject to the ultimate supervision of the Board. In addition to investment advisory services, the Adviser also functions as the servicing agent of the Institutional TEI W Fund (the “Servicing Agent”) and as such provides or procures investor services and administrative assistance for the Institutional TEI W Fund. The Adviser can delegate all or a portion of its duties as Servicing Agent to other parties, who would in turn act as sub-servicing agents.

Under the Institutional TEI W Fund’s organizational documents, the Institutional TEI W Fund’s officers and Directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the

9

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

Institutional TEI W Fund. In the normal course of business, the Institutional TEI W Fund enters into contracts with service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Institutional TEI W Fund. The Institutional TEI W Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve any future potential claims that may be made against the Institutional TEI W Fund. However, based on experience, the General Partner expects that risk of loss to be remote.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES

(a) BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

The accounting and reporting policies of the Institutional TEI W Fund conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying financial statements reflect the financial position of the Institutional TEI W Fund and the results of its operations.

(b) CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Institutional TEI W Fund considers all unpledged temporary cash investments with a maturity date at the time of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

(c) INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

The Institutional TEI W Fund records monthly, its pro-rata share of income, expenses, changes in unrealized appreciation and depreciation, and realized gains and losses derived from the Offshore Institutional W Fund.

The Institutional TEI W Fund records investment transactions on a trade-date basis.

Investments that are held by the Institutional TEI W Fund are marked to fair value at the date of the financial statements, and the corresponding change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation is included in the Statement of Operations.

(d) INVESTMENT VALUATION

The valuation of the Institutional TEI W Fund’s investments is determined as of the close of business at the end of each reporting period, generally monthly. The valuation of the Institutional TEI W Fund’s investments is calculated by Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc., the Institutional TEI W Fund’s independent administrator (the “Administrator”).

The Board has formed a valuation committee (the “Board Valuation Committee”) that is responsible for overseeing the Institutional TEI W Fund’s valuation policies, making recommendations to the Board on valuation-related matters, and overseeing implementation by the Adviser of such valuation policies.

The Board has authorized the Adviser to establish a valuation committee of the Adviser (the “Adviser Valuation Committee”). The function of the Adviser Valuation Committee, subject to the oversight of the Board Valuation Committee and the Board, is generally to review valuation methodologies, valuation determinations, and any information provided to the Adviser Valuation Committee by the Adviser or the Administrator.

10

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

The Institutional TEI W Fund invests substantially all of its assets in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, which in turn invests substantially all of its assets in the Master Fund. Investments in the Master Fund are recorded at fair value based on the Institutional TEI W Fund’s proportional share of the Master Fund’s partners’ capital, through the Offshore Institutional W Fund. Valuation of the investments held by the Master Fund is discussed in the Master Fund’s notes to financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.

(e) INVESTMENT INCOME

For investments in securities, dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, net of withholding taxes. Interest income is recorded as earned on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.

(f) FUND EXPENSES

Unless otherwise voluntarily or contractually assumed by the Adviser or another party, the Institutional TEI W Fund bears all expenses incurred in its business including, directly or indirectly through its investment in the Master Fund (through the Offshore Institutional W Fund), including but not limited to, the following: all costs and expenses related to investment transactions and positions for the Institutional TEI W Fund’s account; legal fees; accounting, auditing and tax preparation fees; recordkeeping and custodial fees; costs of computing the Institutional TEI W Fund’s net asset value; fees for data and software providers; research expenses; costs of insurance; registration expenses; offering costs; expenses of meetings of the partners; directors fees; all costs with respect to communications to partners; offshore withholding taxes; and other types of expenses as may be approved from time to time by the Board.

(g) INCOME TAXES

The Institutional TEI W Fund is organized and operates as a limited partnership and is not subject to income taxes as a separate entity. Such taxes are the responsibility of the individual partners. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the Institutional TEI W Fund’s financial statements. Investments in foreign securities may result in foreign taxes being withheld by the issuer of such securities.

For the current open tax year and for all major jurisdictions, management of the Institutional TEI W Fund has evaluated the tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Institutional TEI W Fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions will “more-likely-than-not” be sustained by the Institutional TEI W Fund upon challenge by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold and that would result in a tax benefit or expense to the Institutional TEI W Fund would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current period. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Institutional TEI W Fund did not recognize any amounts for unrecognized tax benefit/expense. A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefit/expense is not provided herein, as the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefit/expense are zero, with no interim additions, reductions or settlements. Tax positions taken in tax years which remain open under the statute of limitations (generally three years for federal income tax purposes) are subject to examination by federal and state tax jurisdictions.

11

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(h) USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be significant.

(i) ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENSES

The Institutional TEI W Fund’s organizational expenses (the “Organizational Expenses”) were initially borne by the Adviser or an affiliate thereof and for capital account allocation purposes assumed to be reimbursed, over not more than a 60 month period of time, notwithstanding that such Organizational Expenses were expensed in accordance with U.S. GAAP for Institutional TEI W Fund financial reporting purposes upon commencement of operations.

(3) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Institutional TEI W Fund records its investment in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, which in turn invests substantially all of its assets in the Master Fund, at fair value. Investments of the Master Fund are recorded at fair value as more fully discussed in the Master Fund’s notes to financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.

(4) PARTNERS’ CAPITAL ACCOUNTS

(a) ISSUANCE OF INTERESTS

Upon receipt from an eligible investor of an initial or additional application for interests (the “Interests”), which will generally be accepted as of the first day of each month, the Institutional TEI W Fund will issue new Interests. The Interests have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the securities laws of any state. The Institutional TEI W Fund issues Interests only in private placement transactions in accordance with Regulation D or other applicable exemptions under the Securities Act. No public market exists for the Interests, and none is expected to develop. The Institutional TEI W Fund is not required, and does not intend, to hold annual meetings of its partners. The Interests are subject to substantial restrictions on transferability and resale and may not be transferred or resold except as permitted under the Institutional TEI W Fund’s limited partnership agreement. The Institutional TEI W Fund reserves the right to reject any applications for subscription of Interests.

(b) ALLOCATION OF PROFITS AND LOSSES

For each fiscal period, generally monthly, net profits or net losses of the Institutional TEI W Fund, including allocations from the Master Fund (through the Offshore Institutional W Fund), are allocated among and credited to or debited against the capital accounts of all partners as of the last day of each fiscal period in accordance with the partners’ respective capital account ownership percentage for the fiscal period. Net profits or net losses are measured as the net change in the value of the partners’ capital of the Institutional TEI W Fund, including any change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and income, net of expenses, and realized gains or losses during a fiscal period. Net profits or net losses are allocated after giving effect for any initial or additional applications for Interests, which generally occur at the beginning of the month, or any repurchases of Interests.

12

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(c) REPURCHASE OF INTERESTS

A partner will not be eligible to have the Institutional TEI W Fund repurchase all or any portion of an Interest at the partner’s discretion at any time. The Adviser, which also serves as the investment adviser of the Master Fund and Offshore Institutional W Fund, generally recommends to the Board that the Institutional TEI W Fund offer to repurchase such Interests each calendar quarter, pursuant to written tenders by partners.

The Board retains the sole discretion to accept or reject the recommendation of the Adviser and to determine the amount of Interests, if any, that will be purchased in any tender offer that it does approve. Since the Institutional TEI W Fund’s assets are invested in the Master Fund (through the Offshore Institutional W Fund), the ability of the Institutional TEI W Fund to have its Interests in the Master Fund be repurchased would be subject to the Master Fund’s and Offshore Institutional W Fund’s repurchase policies. The Master Fund’s and Offshore Institutional W Fund’s repurchase policies are substantially similar to the Institutional TEI W Fund’s repurchase policy as any tender offer by the Master Fund (through the Offshore Institutional W Fund) is subject to the sole discretion of the Board. In addition, the Institutional TEI W Fund may determine not to conduct a repurchase offer each time the Master Fund and Offshore Institutional W Fund conduct a repurchase offer. In the event Interests are repurchased, there will be a substantial period of time between the date as of which partners must tender their Interests for repurchase and the date they can expect to receive payment for their Interests from the Institutional TEI W Fund.

(5) INVESTMENTS IN PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

As of December 31, 2013, all of the investments made by the Institutional TEI W Fund were in the Master Fund (through the Offshore Institutional W Fund).

(6) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

In the normal course of business, the Investment Funds in which the Institutional TEI W Fund may invest either directly or through the Offshore Institutional W Fund and Master Fund may trade various derivative securities and other financial instruments, and enter into various investment activities with off-balance sheet risk both as an investor and as a principal. The Institutional TEI W Fund’s risk of loss in these Investment Funds is limited to the Institutional TEI W Fund’s pro rata share of the value of its investment in or commitment to such Investment Funds as held directly or through the Offshore Institutional W Fund and Master Fund. In addition, the Master Fund may invest directly in derivative securities or other financial instruments to gain greater or lesser exposure to a particular asset class.

(7) ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT

In consideration for administrative, accounting, and recordkeeping services, the Master Fund pays the Administrator a monthly administration fee based on the month-end partners’ capital of the Master Fund. The Administrator also provides the Institutional TEI W Fund, the Offshore Institutional W Fund and the Master Fund with legal, compliance, transfer agency, and other investor related services at an additional cost.

The fees for Institutional TEI W Fund administration are paid out of the Master Fund’s assets, which decreases the net profits or increases the net losses of the partners in the Institutional TEI W Fund.

13

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(8) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(a) INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEE

In consideration of the advisory and other services provided by the Adviser to the Master Fund and the Institutional TEI W Fund, the Master Fund pays the Adviser an investment management fee (the “Investment Management Fee”) equal to 1.00% on an annualized basis of the Master Fund’s partners’ capital calculated based on the Master Fund’s partners’ capital at the end of each month, payable quarterly in arrears. So long as the Institutional TEI W Fund invests all of its investable assets in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, which in turn invests all of its investable assets in the Master Fund, the Institutional TEI W Fund will not pay the Adviser directly any Investment Management Fee; however, should the Institutional TEI W Fund not have all of its investments in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, it may be charged the 1.00% Investment Management Fee directly. The Institutional TEI W Fund’s partners bear an indirect portion of the Investment Management Fee paid by the Master Fund. The Investment Management Fee decreases the net profits or increases the net losses of the Master Fund and indirectly the Institutional TEI W Fund as the fees reduce the capital accounts of the Master Fund’s partners.

(b) PLACEMENT AGENTS

The Institutional TEI W Fund may engage one or more placement agents (each, a “Placement Agent”) to solicit investments in the Institutional TEI W Fund. Salient Capital, L.P., an affiliate of the Adviser, is a broker-dealer who has been engaged by the Institutional TEI W Fund to serve as a Placement Agent. A Placement Agent may engage one or more sub-placement agents. The Adviser or its affiliates may pay a fee out of their own resources to Placement Agents and sub-placement agents.

(9) FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

	Year ended December 31, 2013		Year ended December 31, 2012		Year ended December 31, 20111
Net investment loss to average partners’ capital2		(1.36)%		(1.51)%		(1.58)%
Gross expenses to average partners’ capital2		2.00%		2.19%		2.35%
Net expenses to average partners capital2		2.00%		2.19%		2.19%3
Portfolio turnover4		16.95%		20.88%		26.72%
Total return5,6,7		4.07%		1.93%		(6.23)%
Partners’ capital, end of year (000s)	$	15,408	$	22,611	$	26,364

An investor’s return (and operating ratios) may vary from those reflected based on the timing of capital transactions.

1 The Institutional TEI W Fund commenced operations on January 1, 2011.

2 Ratios are calculated by dividing the indicated amount by average partners’ capital measured at the end of each month during the year. Ratios include allocations of net investment loss and expenses from the Offshore Institutional W Fund and Master Fund.

3 Ratio includes expenses reimbursed by the Adviser. Had the Organizational Expenses not been included as an expense at Inception and were instead amortized over 60 months as they are being handled for capital allocation purposes, the ratio of net expenses to average partners’ capital would have been 1.75% for the year ended December 31, 2011. (see Note 2)

14

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

4 The Institutional TEI W Fund is invested exclusively in the Offshore Institutional W Fund, which in turn is invested solely in the Master Fund, therefore this ratio reflects the portfolio turnover of the Master Fund, which is for the year indicated.

5 Calculated as geometrically linked monthly returns for each month in the year.

6 Calculated including benefit of early repurchase fees in each applicable year. Had these early repurchase fees not been included as income for the purposes of the total return calculation, the total return for 2012 would have been 1.80%.

7 The reported total return amount for the year ended December 31, 2011, is negatively impacted by the write off of the Institutional TEI W and the Offshore Institutional W Funds’ Organizational Expenses, which occurred at Inception of the Institutional TEI W and Offshore Institutional W Funds’ operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Had these costs not been included as an expense at Inception for the purposes of the total return calculation and were instead amortized over 60 months as they are being handled for capital allocation purposes, the total return would have been (3.99)% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

(10) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 18, 2014, the Board approved a tender offer (the “Offer”) to be made for up to 100% of the Institutional TEI W Fund’s outstanding Interests with a valuation date of March 31, 2014, with a potential extension of the valuation date to June 30, 2014 depending on certain factors as set forth in the Offer. Unlike the Institutional TEI W Fund’s prior offers to repurchase Interests, with respect to which the Institutional TEI W Fund paid repurchase proceeds in cash, proceeds for Interests tendered and accepted pursuant to the Offer will not be paid in cash. Proceeds for tendered Interests will be paid in-kind with tendering partners receiving 100% of their repurchase proceeds in shares of limited partnership interests (the “Shares”) in PMF Fund, L.P. (the “PMF Fund”), a newly-formed, closed-end, non-diversified, investment company registered under the 1940 Act that invests substantially all of its assets in The Endowment PMF Master Fund, L.P. (the “PMF Master Fund” and together with the PMF Fund, the “PMF Funds”), which also is a newly-formed, closed-end, non-diversified, registered investment company under the 1940 Act.

The Offer commenced on February 20, 2014 and, unless extended, will expire on March 19, 2014. The estimated net asset value will be calculated for the purpose of the Offer as of March 31, 2014 or, if the valuation date is extended, June 30, 2014. The Offer is subject to certain conditions and is being made simultaneously with a cash tender offer by the PMF Fund in which partners tendering Interests pursuant to the Offer, and therefore becoming holders of Shares of the PMF Fund, will have the opportunity to participate (the “PMF Funds Offer”). The PMF Funds Offer is a cash repurchase offer pursuant to which Shares will be repurchased at a discount to their net asset value, assuming all of the conditions of the PMF Funds Offer are satisfied. The Offer is not contingent upon the completion of the PMF Funds Offer. Additional information regarding the Offer and the PMF Funds Offer is available free of charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Management of the Institutional TEI W Fund has evaluated the need for disclosures and/or adjustments resulting from subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, no adjustments were required to the financial statements as of December 31, 2013.

15

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Directors and Officers

The Institutional TEI W Fund’s operations are managed under the direction and oversight of the Board. Each Director serves for an indefinite term or until he or she reaches mandatory retirement, if any, as established by the Board. The Board appoints the officers of the Institutional TEI W Fund who are responsible for the Institutional TEI W Fund’s day-to-day business decisions based on policies set by the Board. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Compensation for Directors

The Institutional TEI W Fund, The Master Fund, The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P. and The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P., together pay each of the Directors who is not an “interested person” of the Adviser, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Directors”) an annual retainer of $38,000, paid quarterly, an annual Board meeting fee of $15,000, a fee of $1,250 per informal Board meeting, a fee of $1,250 per telephonic Board meeting, an annual fee of $4,000 for membership on each committee, an annual fee of $5,000 for the audit committee chairman and $2,500 for each other committee chair, each of which is paid quarterly, and an annual fee of $7,500, paid quarterly, to the Lead Independent Director. There are currently six Independent Directors. In the interest of retaining Independent Directors of the highest quality, the Board intends to periodically review such compensation and may modify it as the Board deems appropriate.

Interested Directors

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
John A. Blaisdell(1) Age: 53 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director, Co-Principal Executive Officer (Since 2004)	Member, Investment Committee of the Adviser, since 2002; Managing Director of Salient, since 2002.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.

16

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Andrew Linbeck(1) Age: 49 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director, Co-Principal Executive Officer (Since 2004)	Member, Investment Committee of the Adviser, since 2002; Managing Director of Salient, since 2002.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) 2010-2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.
A. Haag Sherman(1) Age: 48 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	Member, Investment Committee of the Adviser, 2002-2011; Managing Director of Salient, 2002-2011.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) 2010-2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; Plains Capital Corporation, since 2009; Blue Dolphin Energy Company, since 2012.

(1) This person’s status as an “interested” director arises from his affiliation with Salient Partners, L.P., which itself is an affiliate of the Master Fund, The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P., The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P., and the Adviser.

17

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Independent Directors

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Karin B. Bonding, CFA Age: 74 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2010)	Lecturer, University of Virginia, since 1996; President of Capital Markets Institute, Inc. (fee-only financial planner and investment advisor) since 1996.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; Brandes Investment Trust (investment companies) (four funds) since 2006; Credit Suisse Alternative Capital Funds (investment companies) (six funds) 2005-2010.
Jonathan P. Carroll Age: 52 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	President of Lazarus Financial LLC (holding company) since 2006; private investor for the past six years.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.

18

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Dr. Bernard Harris Age: 57 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2009)	Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner, Vesalius Ventures, Inc (venture investing), since 2002; President of The Space Agency (marketing), since 1999; President of The Harris Foundation (non-profit), since 1998; clinical scientist, flight surgeon and astronaut for NASA, 1986 to 1996.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc., since 2005; Sterling Bancshares, Inc., since 2007; RMD Networks, Inc., since 2006; Monebo Technologies Inc., since 2009; AG Technologies, since 2009; The Harris Foundation, Inc., since 1998; Houston Technology Center, since 2004; Greater Houston Community Foundation, 2004-2009; Communities in Schools, since 2007; ZOO SCORE “Counselors to America’s Small Business”, since 2009; American Telemedicine Association, since 2007; Houston Angel Network, since 2004; BioHouston, since 2006; The National Math and Science Initiative, and Space Agency, since 2008.

19

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Richard C. Johnson Age: 76 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	Senior Counsel (retired) for Baker Botts LLP (law firm) since 2002; Managing Partner, Baker Botts, 1998 to 2002; practiced law at Baker Botts, 1966 to 2002 (1972 to 2002 as a partner).	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.
G. Edward Powell Age: 77 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	Principal of Mills & Stowell (private equity) since 2002. Principal, Innovation Growth Partners (consulting), since 2002; Consultant to emerging and middle market businesses, 1994-2002; Managing Partner, PriceWaterhouse & Co. (Houston Office, 1982 to 1994).	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; Therapy Track, LLC, since 2009; Global Water Technologies, Inc.; Datavox Holdings, Inc.; Energy Services International, Inc., since 2004.

20

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Scott E. Schwinger Age: 48 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	President, The McNair Group (management), since 2006; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the Houston Texans (professional football team) (1999).	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; The Make-A-Wish Foundation, since 2008; YES Prep Public Schools, since 2001.

Officers of the Fund Who Are Not Directors

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with the Fund	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years
Paul Bachtold Age: 40 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) (Since 2010)	CCO, Salient, since 2010; Consultant, Chicago Investment Group (compliance consulting), 2009-2010; US Compliance Manager, Barclays Global Investors, 2005-2008.
John E. Price Age: 46 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Treasurer; Principal Financial Officer (Since 2004)	Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer, Adviser, since 2003; Partner, Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Salient, since 2003.

21

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with the Fund	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years
Jeremy Radcliffe Age: 39 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Secretary (Since 2013)	Managing Director of Salient, since 2002.

Allocation of Investments

The following chart indicates the allocation of investments among the asset classes in the Master Fund as of December 31, 2013.

Asset Class1	Fair Value		%
Arbitrage Strategies	$	259,380,056		12.40
Domestic Equity		27,794,430		1.33
Energy		236,553,251		11.31
Enhanced Fixed Income		145,106,419		6.94
Global Opportunistic		212,121,331		10.14
International Equity		43,287,010		2.07
Natural Resources		34,182,182		1.63
Private Equity		727,754,609		34.77
Real Estate		195,817,823		9.36
Technology		129,024		0.01
Call Options Purchased		20,750,470		0.99
Money Market Funds		189,272,108		9.05
Total Investments	$	2,092,148,713		100.00

1 The complete list of investments is included in the Schedule of Investments of the Master Fund, which is included elsewhere in this report.

Form N-Q Filings

The Institutional TEI W Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Institutional TEI W Fund’s Form N-Q is available on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov. The Institutional TEI W Fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Securities and Exchange Commission Public Reference Room in Washington, DC and information regarding operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

22

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Proxy Voting Policies

A description of the policies and procedures that the Institutional TEI W Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-725-9456; and (ii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov.

Information regarding how the Institutional TEI W Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-725-9456; and (ii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov.

Additional Information

The Institutional TEI W Fund’s private placement memorandum (the “PPM”) includes additional information about Directors of the Institutional TEI W Fund. The PPM is available, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-725-9456.

23

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Privacy Policy (Unaudited)

The Institutional TEI W Fund recognizes the importance of securing personal financial information. It is our policy to safeguard any personal and financial information that may be entrusted to us. The following is a description of the Institutional TEI W Fund’s policy regarding disclosure of nonpublic personal information.

We collect nonpublic personal information as follows:

We collect information about our investors, including, but not limited to, the investor’s name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, social security number and date of birth. We collect that information from subscription agreements, other forms of correspondence that we receive from investors, from personal conversations and from affiliated entities as permitted by law.

We receive information about investor transactions with us, including, but not limited to, account number, account balance, investment amounts, withdrawal amounts and other financial information.

We are permitted by law to disclose nonpublic information we collect, as described above, to the Institutional TEI W Fund’s service providers, including the Institutional TEI W Fund’s investment adviser, sub-advisers, servicing agent, independent administrator, custodian, legal counsel, accountant and auditor. We do not disclose any nonpublic information about our current or former investors to nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We restrict access to investor nonpublic personal information to those persons who require such information to provide products or services to investors. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to guard investors’ nonpublic personal information.

If an investor’s investment relationship with the Institutional TEI W Fund involves a financial intermediary, including, but not limited to, a broker-dealer, bank or trust company, the privacy policy of such investor’s financial intermediary would govern how any nonpublic personal information would be shared by them with nonaffiliated third parties.

24

the

ENDOWMENT FUND

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.

Shareholders’ Report

December 31, 2013

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners and Board of Directors

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities and partners’ capital of The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. (the “Master Fund”), including the schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in partners’ capital for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Master Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2013, by correspondence with custodians and investees; or other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. as of December 31, 2013, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its partners’ capital for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio

March 1, 2014

26

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

December 31, 2013

Assets
Investments in Investment Funds, at fair value (cost $756,366,463)	$	934,742,972
Investments in affiliated Investment Funds, at fair value (cost $900,292,673)		947,192,231
Investments in securities, at fair value (cost $190,226,451)		189,463,040
Investments in derivative contracts, at fair value (cost $24,991,550)		20,750,470
Total investments		2,092,148,713
Cash and cash equivalents		469,431,361
Deposits with brokers for futures contracts		21,305,867
Deposits with brokers for swap agreements		15,534,304
Net unrealized gain on swap agreements		1,608,926
Premiums paid on credit default swap agreements		2,907,059
Receivable from investments sold		85,380,825
Receivable from affiliated investments sold		35,242,278
Prepaids and other assets		422,840
Total assets		2,723,982,173
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Withdrawals payable		650,870,677
Investment Management Fees payable		6,631,332
Offshore withholding tax payable		910,683
Administration fees payable		255,784
Payable to Adviser		100,000
Payable to Directors		141,750
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,030,521
Total liabilities		659,940,747
Partners’ capital		2,064,041,426
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	2,723,982,173

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

27

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2013

	Shares		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Investments in Investment Funds
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
Cayman Islands
Arbitrage Strategies (0.03% of Partners’ Capital)
Montrica Global Opportunities Fund, L.P.(1)		25,428	$	669,370
Natural Resources (1.46% of Partners’ Capital)
Sentient Global Resources Fund III, L.P.(2)				21,944,417
Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P.				8,212,383
Private Equity (14.65% of Partners’ Capital)
ABRY Advanced Securities Fund, L.P.				4,831,101
CX Partners Fund Limited(1)				18,264,000
Gavea Investment Fund II A, L.P.(1)				1,916,000
Gavea Investment Fund III A, L.P.				36,011,134
Hillcrest Fund, L.P.(3)				12,205,434
India Asset Recovery Fund, L.P.				228,169
J.C. Flowers III, L.P.(2)				11,034,760
LC Fund IV, L.P.(1)(2)				25,533,642
New Horizon Capital III, L.P.(2)				42,264,844
Northstar Equity Partners III Limited				6,997,547
Orchid Asia IV, L.P.(2)				12,792,082
Reservoir Capital Partners (Cayman), L.P.				13,253,028
Tiger Global Private Investment Partners IV, L.P.(2)				10,388,497
Tiger Global Private Investment Partners V, L.P.(2)				23,850,820
Tiger Global Private Investment Partners VI, L.P.(2)				8,892,810
Trustbridge Partners II, L.P.				22,000,000
Trustbridge Partners III, L.P.(1)(2)				40,243,212
Trustbridge Partners IV, L.P.(2)				11,670,162
Real Estate (1.70% of Partners’ Capital)
Forum European Realty Income III, L.P.				16,592,843
Phoenix Asia Real Estate Investments II, L.P.(2)				11,737,256
Phoenix Real Estate Fund (T), L.P.(1)				6,832,239
Total Cayman Islands				368,365,750
Guernsey
Private Equity (0.46% of Partners’ Capital)
Mid Europa Fund III, L.P.(2)				9,414,145
Total Guernsey				9,414,145
Republic of Mauritius
Real Estate (0.11% of Partners’ Capital)
Orbis Real Estate Fund I(1)				2,180,645
Total Republic of Mauritius				2,180,645

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

28

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

	Shares	Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies (continued)
United Kingdom
Private Equity (1.17% of Partners’ Capital)
Darwin Private Equity I, L.P.(2)		$	6,699,409
Sovereign Capital Limited Partnership III(1)			17,424,428
Real Estate (0.42% of Partners’ Capital)
Benson Elliott Real Estate Partners II, L.P.			2,151,595
Patron Capital, L.P. II			541,983
Patron Capital, L.P. III			5,912,292
Total United Kingdom			32,729,707
United States
Arbitrage Strategies (11.46% of Partners’ Capital)
Blue Mountain Credit Alternatives Fund, L.P.(1)			79,092,477
Citadel Wellington, LLC			67,582,977
Eton Park Fund, L.P.			6,121,953
Kenmont Onshore Fund, L.P.(1)			18,684
King Street Capital, L.P.			968,383
Magnetar Capital Fund, L.P.(1)			7,591,968
Magnetar SPV, LLC (Series L)(1)			2,046,734
Millennium USA, L.P.			29,411,715
OZ Asia Domestic Partners, L.P.			2,071,062
PIPE Equity Partners, LLC(3)			12,411,446
PIPE Select Fund, LLC(3)			27,883,086
Stark Investments Limited Partnership(2)			116,996
Stark Select Asset Fund, LLC			1,265,639
Domestic Equity (1.34% of Partners’ Capital)
CCM Small Cap Value Qualified Fund, L.P.(3)			5,210,242
Ithan Creek Partners, L.P.			19,989,632
Kior Shares Liquidating Capital Account			70,587
Samlyn Onshore Fund, L.P.			2,462,061
Energy (11.46% of Partners’ Capital)
ArcLight Energy Partners Fund IV, L.P.(2)			4,126,954
ArcLight Energy Partners Fund V, L.P.(2)			4,950,946
CamCap Resources, L.P.			222,446
EnCap Energy Capital Fund VII-B, L.P.(2)			4,406,025
EnCap Energy Infrastructure TE Feeder, L.P.(1)(2)			5,722,401
Intervale Capital Fund, L.P.(1)(2)			15,288,846
Merit Energy Partners G, L.P.(2)			11,644,715
NGP Energy Technology Partners II, L.P.(2)			5,107,039
NGP IX Offshore Fund, L.P.(2)			34,901,000

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

29

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

	Shares		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies (continued)
United States (continued)
Energy (11.46% of Partners’ Capital) (continued)
NGP Midstream & Resources, L.P.(2)			$	52,557,664
Quantum Parallel Partners V, L.P.(3)				29,590,634
Tenaska Power Fund II-A, L.P.(1)(2)				18,683,665
The Energy & Minerals Group Fund II(2)				10,301,261
Velite Energy, L.P.(1)				39,049,655
Enhanced Fixed Income (7.03% of Partners’ Capital)
BDCM Partners I, L.P.(1)				40,530,131
Credit Distressed Blue Line Fund, L.P.(3)				13,190,943
Fortelus Special Situations Fund, L.P.(1)				5,094,797
Halcyon European Structured Opportunities Fund, L.P.(3)				89,380
Harbinger Capital Partners Fund I, L.P.(3)				25,240,685
Harbinger Capital Partners Fund II, L.P.				1,894,261
Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P.				1,790,932
Harbinger Class L Holdings (U.S.), LLC				161,786
Harbinger Class LS Holdings (U.S.) Trust		3,816		391,796
Harbinger Class PE Holdings (U.S.) Trust		10		1,620,152
Prospect Harbor Credit Partners, L.P.				2,518,673
Providence MBS Fund, L.P.(1)				52,582,883
Global Opportunistic (10.28% of Partners’ Capital)
Blueshift Energy Fund, L.P.(3)				33,372,298
Falcon Edge Global, L.P.				16,032,947
Hayman Capital Partners, L.P.(1)(2)				63,811,807
Kepos Alpha Fund, L.P.(1)				78,659,225
Passport Global Strategies III, Ltd.(1)		2,244		870,073
Senator Global Opportunity Fund, L.P.				5,179,906
Valiant Capital Partners, L.P.				6,550,787
Viking Global Equities, L.P.				7,644,288
International Equity (2.07% of Partners’ Capital)
Penta Asia Domestic Partners, L.P.				4,735,958
Steel Partners Japan Strategic Fund, L.P.				1,823,223
TAEF Fund, LLC				3,908,401
Tybourne Equity (U.S.) Fund(1)(2)				32,203,799
Natural Resources (0.00% of Partners’ Capital)
Tocqueville Gold Partners, L.P.				24,408
Private Equity (18.98% of Partners’ Capital)
Accel-KKR Capital Partners III, L.P.				18,928,279
Advent Latin American Private Equity Fund IV-F, L.P.				4,566,852

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

30

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

	Shares		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies (continued)
United States (continued)
Private Equity (18.98% of Partners’ Capital) (continued)
Advent Latin American Private Equity Fund V-F, L.P.(1)			$	8,509,932
Audax Mezzanine Fund II, L.P.(2)				1,404,911
Audax Mezzanine Fund III, L.P.(2)				7,776,625
BDCM Opportunity Fund II, L.P.(2)				11,295,794
Black River Commodity Multi-Strategy Fund, LLC				675,608
Capital Royalty Partners, L.P.(2)				964,957
Catterton Growth Partners, L.P.				18,349,957
CEF-Safety Kleen Liquidating Account		4,810		142,881
Chrysalis Ventures III, L.P.				2,165,345
Crosslink Crossover Fund IV, L.P.				1,539,384
Crosslink Crossover Fund V, L.P.				6,304,207
Crosslink Crossover Fund VI, L.P.				16,577,771
Dace Ventures I, L.P.(1)				1,509,963
Fairhaven Capital Partners, L.P.				7,607,946
Garrison Opportunity Fund II A, LLC				15,608,617
Garrison Opportunity Fund, LLC(1)				20,554,861
HealthCor Partners Fund, L.P.(1)				8,719,201
Highland Credit Strategies Liquidation Vehicle Onshore				2,222,131
Integral Capital Partners VIII, L.P.(1)				2,872,000
L-R Global Partners, L.P				404,777
MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners III, L.P.(2)				10,805,832
Middle East North Africa Opportunities Fund, L.P.(3)		5,089		1,315,734
Monomoy Capital Partners II, L.P.				4,252,442
Monomoy Capital Partners, L.P.				2,683,686
Monsoon India Inflection Fund 2, L.P.				230,000
Monsoon India Inflection Fund, L.P.				130,000
Pine Brook Capital Partners, L.P.(2)				23,775,394
Pinto America Growth Fund, L.P.(2)				1,560,110
Private Equity Investment Fund IV, L.P.(1)(2)				5,409,231
Private Equity Investment Fund V, L.P.(1)(2)				39,915,679
Saints Capital VI, L.P.(1)(2)				16,440,779
Sanderling Venture Partners VI Co-Investment Fund, L.P.				1,755,251
Sanderling Venture Partners VI, L.P.				1,268,451
Sterling Capital Partners II, L.P.(2)				1,630,110
Sterling Group Partners II, L.P.				960,582
Sterling Group Partners III, L.P.				8,599,007
Strategic Value Global Opportunities Fund I-A, L.P.				2,046,887
Tenaya Capital V, L.P.				6,732,216

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

31

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

	Shares		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies (continued)
United States (continued)
Private Equity (18.97% of Partners’ Capital) (continued)
Tenaya Capital VI, L.P.			$	3,881,287
The Column Group, L.P.				8,451,768
The Founders Fund III, L.P.				18,490,313
The Founders Fund IV, L.P.				9,535,472
The Raptor Private Holdings, L.P.		1,833		936,975
Trivest Fund IV, L.P.(1)(2)				19,392,683
Tuckerbrook SB Global Distressed Fund I, L.P.(1)				5,293,587
VCFA Private Equity Partners IV, L.P.(2)				1,382,838
VCFA Venture Partners V, L.P.				5,310,105
Voyager Capital Fund III, L.P.				3,815,370
WestView Capital Partners II, L.P.(1)(2)				27,135,597
Real Estate (6.62% of Partners’ Capital)
Aslan Realty Partners III, L.L.C.(2)				484,300
Cypress Realty VI, L.P.				5,604,852
Florida Real Estate Value Fund, L.P.(1)				8,150,000
GTIS Brazil Real Estate Fund (Brazilian Real), L.P.(1)				23,900,000
Lone Star Real Estate Fund II (U.S.), L.P.				5,831,654
Monsoon Infrastructure & Realty Co-Invest, L.P.(1)				14,994,404
Northwood Real Estate Co-Investors, L.P.(2)				7,033,803
Northwood Real Estate Partners, L.P.(2)				13,357,102
Parmenter Realty Fund III, L.P.(2)				6,018,110
Parmenter Realty Fund IV, L.P.(2)				8,300,019
Pearlmark Mezzanine Realty Partners III, LLC(1)(2)				14,205,600
Pennybacker II, L.P.(1)(2)				7,726,279
SBC Latin America Housing US Fund, L.P.(1)				7,641,872
Square Mile Partners III, L.P.(2)				13,404,731
Total United States				1,429,284,543
Total Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies				1,841,974,790		89.24%
Passive Foreign Investment Companies
Cayman Companies Limited by Shares, Exempted Companies and Limited Liability Companies
Arbitrage Strategies (1.08% of Partners’ Capital)
CRC Credit Fund Ltd.		78,050		21,372,049
Overseas CAP Partners, Inc.		92		755,517
International Equity (0.03% of Partners’ Capital)
Quorum Fund Limited		10,369		615,629

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

32

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

	Shares		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Passive Foreign Investment Companies (continued)
Cayman Companies Limited by Shares, Exempted Companies
and Limited Liability Companies (continued)
Natural Resources (0.19% of Partners’ Capital)
Ospraie Special Opportunities (Offshore), Ltd.			$	4,000,974
Total Cayman Companies Limited by Shares, Exempted Companies and Limited Liability Companies				26,744,169
Total Passive Foreign Investment Companies				26,744,169		1.30%
Private Corporations
United States
Real Estate (0.64% of Partners’ Capital)
Legacy Partners Realty Fund II, Inc.				2,064,527
Legacy Partners Realty Fund III, Inc.				7,552,271
Net Lease Private REIT V, Inc.(2)				137,708
Net Lease Private REIT VI, Inc.(2)				770,918
Net Lease Private REIT VII, Inc.(2)				1,345,410
Net Lease Private REIT VII-A, Inc.(2)				1,345,410
Total Private Corporations				13,216,244		0.64%
Total Investments in Investment Funds Cost ($1,656,659,136)				1,881,935,203		91.17%
Investments in Securities
Common Stocks
United States
Domestic Equity (0.00% of Partners’ Capital)
Kior, Inc.		36,850		61,908
Technology (0.01% of Partners’ Capital)
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Co.		7,608		129,024
Total Common Stocks				190,932		0.01%
Registered Investment Company
United States
Money Market Funds (9.17% of Partners’ Capital)
JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market Fund(2)		189,272,108		189,272,108
Total Registered Investment Company				189,272,108		9.17%
Total Investments in Securities (Cost $190,226,451)				189,463,040		9.18%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

33

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

	Shares		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
Derivative Contracts—Assets
Call Options Purchased
United States
CMS 10 Year One Look Cap, 10 Year USD Swap Rate (Strike Rate 5.50%, Expiration 05/01/19)		1,079,000,000	$	7,258,678
CMS 10 Year One Look Cap, 10 Year USD Swap Rate (Strike Rate 6.50%, Expiration 05/01/19)		1,350,000,000		5,567,365
CMS 10 Year One Look Cap, 10 Year USD Swap Rate (Strike Rate 5.62%, Expiration 05/02/19)		714,285,714		4,459,742
CMS 10 Year One Look Cap, 10 Year USD Swap Rate (Strike Rate 6.62%, Expiration 05/02/19)		877,192,983		3,464,685
Total Call Options Purchased				20,750,470		1.01%
Warrants Purchased
United States
Global Opportunistic (0.00% of Partners’ Capital)
Bally Total Fitness Holdings Corp. Warrants Exp. Sep. 2014, Strike Price $20.00		4		—
Total Warrants Purchased				—		0.00%
Total Derivative Contracts—Assets (Cost $24,991,550)				20,750,470		1.01%
Total Investments (Cost $1,871,877,137)			$	2,092,148,713		101.36%

The Master Fund’s total outstanding capital commitments to Investment Funds as of December 31, 2013 were $304,586,740. For certain Investment Funds for which the Master Fund has a capital commitment, the Master Fund may be allocated its pro-rata share of expenses prior to having to fund a capital call for such expenses.

All Investment Funds and securities are non-income producing unless noted otherwise.

Refer to Note 5, Investments in Portfolio Securities, for information regarding the liquidity of the Master Fund’s investments.

(1) Affiliated investments (See Note 5c)

(2) Income producing investment

(3) Affiliated investments for which ownership exceeds 25% of Partners’ Capital

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

34

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

Futures Contracts Purchased:

Description	Expiration Date	Number of Contracts		Notional Amount at Value		Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
10 Year U.S. Treasury Note	March 2014		326	$	40,113,281	$	(896,615	)
CAC40 10 Euro	January 2014		443		26,194,502		1,013,886
E-Mini S&P 500	March 2014		2,067		190,277,685		3,963,453
Euro BUXL 30-Year Bond	March 2014		241		40,451,772		(315,883	)
FTSE/MIB Index	March 2014		198		25,908,922		959,365
German Stock Index	March 2014		84		27,747,813		1,158,724
IBEX 35 Index	January 2014		194		26,337,950		1,195,668
Tokyo Price Index	March 2014		212		26,225,662		914,995
				$	403,257,587	$	7,993,593

Total Return Swap Agreements:

Underlying Instrument	Counterparty		Maturity Date		Notional Amount at Value		Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Long Position:
KOSPI 200 Index		Goldman Sachs		3/13/2014	$	25,427,075	$	268,006

Credit Default Swap Agreements—Sell Protection:^(a)

Underlying Instrument	Fixed Deal Receive Rate			Maturity Date		Implied Credit Spread at December 31 2013(b)			Notional Amount(c)		Value(d)		Upfront Premiums Paid (Received)		Unrealized Gain (Loss)
CDX Emerging Markets Index Swap Agreement with Goldman Sachs International; Series 19		5.00	%		6/20/18		2.88	%	$	4,542,884	$	405,619	$	456,560	$	(50,941	)
CDX Emerging Markets Index Swap Agreement with Goldman Sachs International; Series 20		5.00	%		12/20/18		2.75	%		10,580,449		1,090,915		1,052,755		38,160
CDX iTraxx Europe Crossover Index Swap Agreement with Goldman Sachs International; Series 20		5.00	%		12/20/18		2.87	%		15,083,787		1,439,396		660,482		778,914
CDX North America High Yield Index Swap Agreement with Goldman Sachs International; Series 21		5.00	%		12/20/18		3.08	%		15,123,333		1,312,049		737,262		574,787
											$	4,247,979	$	2,907,059	$	1,340,920

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

35

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Schedule of Investments, continued

December 31, 2013

(a) When a credit event occurs as defined under the terms of the swap agreement, the Master Fund as a seller of credit protection will either (i) pay to the buyer of protection an amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity and take delivery of the reference entity or (ii) pay a net amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity less its recovery value.

(b) Implied credit spread, represented in absolute terms, utilized in determining the market value of the credit default swap agreement as of period end, serves as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represents the likelihood or risk of default for the credit derivative. The implied credit spread of a referenced entity reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Generally, wider credit spreads represent a perceived deterioration of the reference entity’s credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the swap agreement.

(c) The notional amount represents the maximum potential payment amount the Master Fund could be required to make as a seller of credit protection if a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap agreement.

(d) Value includes upfront payments paid (received) and unrealized gain (loss).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

36

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statement of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Investment income:
Dividend income	$	10,727,115
Interest income		1,697,803
Dividend income from affiliated investments		4,951,830
Interest income from affiliated investments		204,821
Total investment income		17,581,569
Expenses:
Investment Management Fees		28,677,960
Administration fees		1,645,176
Professional fees		1,203,891
Custodian fees		229,395
Line of credit commitment fees		450,940
Directors fees		480,000
Interest expense		450,210
Offshore withholding tax expense		4,012,275
Other expenses		886,503
Total expenses		38,036,350
Net investment loss		(20,454,781	)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss):
Net realized gain from investments and foreign currency translations		199,189,193
Net realized loss from futures contracts		(30,196,456	)
Net realized loss from swap contracts		(59,469,633	)
Net realized loss from forward foreign currency exchange contracts		(8,860,029	)
Net realized gain from redemptions in-kind		170,632
Net realized gain from affiliated investments		19,603,727
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation		22,813,375
Net realized and unrealized gain		143,250,809
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations	$	122,796,028

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

37

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013

Partners’ capital at December 31, 2011	$	4,301,278,858
Contributions		132,053,507
Withdrawals		(1,459,231,885	)
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations:
Net investment loss		(30,336,972	)
Net realized gain from investments and foreign currency translations		236,860,829
Net realized gain from purchased option contracts		1,896,642
Net realized loss from futures contracts		(21,473,556	)
Net realized loss from redemptions in-kind		(1,112,455	)
Net realized gain from affiliated investments		56,413,884
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation		(144,614,669	)
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations		97,633,703
Partners’ capital at December 31, 2012		3,071,734,183
Contributions		468,913
Withdrawals		(1,130,957,698	)
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations:
Net investment loss		(20,454,781	)
Net realized gain from investments and foreign currency translations		199,189,193
Net realized loss from futures contracts		(30,196,456	)
Net realized loss from swap contracts		(59,469,633	)
Net realized loss from forward foreign currency exchange contracts		(8,860,029	)
Net realized gain from redemptions in-kind		170,632
Net realized gain from affiliated investments		19,603,727
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation		22,813,375
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations		122,796,028
Partners’ capital at December 31, 2013	$	2,064,041,426

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

38

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations	$	122,796,028
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in partners’ capital resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Purchases of investments		(2,040,454,592	)
Proceeds from disposition of investments		3,178,476,789
Premiums paid on credit default swap agreements		(2,907,059	)
Net realized gain from investments		(199,811,166	)
Net realized gain from redemptions in-kind		(170,632	)
Net realized gain from affiliated investments		(19,603,727	)
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from investments		(38,218	)
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from swap agreements		(1,608,926	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Deposits with brokers for futures contracts		26,790,490
Deposits with brokers for swap agreements		(15,534,304	)
Interest and dividends receivable		30,285
Dividends receivable from affiliated investments		78,786
Receivable from investments sold		69,534,999
Receivable from affiliated investments sold		(10,203,711	)
Prepaids and other assets		(276,185	)
Investment Management Fees payable		(1,401,055	)
Offshore withholding tax payable		(2,999,311	)
Administration fees payable		(45,989	)
Payable to Adviser		75,048
Payable to Directors		28,375
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(580,931	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,102,174,994
Cash flows from financing activities:
Contributions		468,913
Withdrawals		(692,589,280	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(692,120,367	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		410,054,627
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		59,376,734
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	469,431,361
Supplemental schedule of cash activity:
Cash paid for offshore withholding taxes	$	7,011,586
Cash paid for interest		445,812
Supplemental schedule of noncash activity:
Redemptions in-kind (Cost $880,810)	$	1,051,442

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

39

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2013

(1) ORGANIZATION

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. (the “Master Fund”) a Delaware limited partnership, commenced operations on April 1, 2003. The Master Fund operated as an unregistered investment vehicle until March 10, 2004, at which time it registered as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Master Fund is the master fund in a master-feeder structure in which there are currently nine feeder funds.

The Master Fund’s investment objective is to preserve capital and to generate consistent long-term appreciation and returns across a market cycle (which is estimated to be five to seven years). The Master Fund is primarily a “fund of funds” which pursues its investment objective by investing its assets in a variety of investment vehicles including, but not limited to, limited partnerships, limited liability companies, offshore corporations and other foreign investment vehicles (collectively, the “Investment Funds”), registered investment companies (including exchange-traded funds) and direct investments in marketable securities and derivative instruments. The Investment Funds are managed by a carefully selected group of investment managers, identified by the Adviser, as hereinafter defined. The various styles and strategies employed by the Investment Funds and supplemented by the Master Fund’s direct investments, serve to achieve a portfolio that is broadly allocated.

The Endowment Fund GP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, serves as the general partner of the Master Fund (the “General Partner”). To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the General Partner has irrevocably delegated to a board of directors (the “Board” and each member a “Director”) its rights and powers to monitor and oversee the business affairs of the Master Fund, including the complete and exclusive authority to oversee and establish policies regarding the management, conduct, and operation of the Master Fund’s business. A majority of the members of the Board are independent of the General Partner and its management. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board may delegate any of its rights, powers and authority to, among others, the officers of the Master Fund, the Adviser, as hereinafter defined, or any committee of the Board.

The Board is authorized to engage an investment adviser, and pursuant to an investment management agreement, (the “Investment Management Agreement”), it has selected Endowment Advisers, L.P. (the “Adviser”), to manage the Master Fund’s portfolio and operations. The Adviser is a Delaware limited partnership that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Under the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser is responsible for the establishment of an investment committee (the “Investment Committee”), which is responsible for developing, implementing, and supervising the Master Fund’s investment program subject to the ultimate supervision of the Board.

Under the Master Fund’s organizational documents, the Master Fund’s Directors and officers are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Master Fund. In the normal course of business, the Master Fund enters into contracts with service providers, which also provide for indemnifications by the Master Fund. The Master Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve any future potential claims that may be made against the Master Fund. However, based on experience, the General Partner expects that risk of loss to be remote.

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES

(a) BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

The accounting and reporting policies of the Master Fund conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying financial statements reflect the financial position of the Master Fund and the results of its operations.

40

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(b) CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Master Fund considers all unpledged temporary cash investments with a maturity date at the time of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

(c) INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

The Master Fund records investment transactions on a trade-date basis.

Investments that are held by the Master Fund, including those that have been sold short, are marked to fair value at the date of the financial statements, and the corresponding change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation is included in the Statement of Operations.

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Other investment fund distributions are recorded based on the detail provided with the distribution notice, as applicable. Realized gains or losses on the disposition of investments are accounted for based on the first in first out method.

(d) INVESTMENT VALUATION

The valuation of the Master Fund’s investments is determined as of the close of business at the end of each reporting period, generally monthly. The valuation of the Master Fund’s investments is calculated by Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc., the Master Fund’s independent administrator (the “Administrator”).

The Board has formed a valuation committee (the “Board Valuation Committee”) that is responsible for overseeing the Master Fund’s valuation policies, making recommendations to the Board on valuation-related matters, and overseeing implementation by the Adviser of such valuation policies.

The Board has authorized the Adviser to establish a valuation committee of the Adviser (the “Adviser Valuation Committee”). The function of the Adviser Valuation Committee, subject to the oversight of the Board Valuation Committee and the Board, is generally to review valuation methodologies, valuation determinations, and any information provided to the Adviser Valuation Committee by the Adviser or the Administrator.

The Master Fund is not able to obtain complete underlying investment holding details on each of the Investment Funds in order to determine if the Master Fund’s proportional, aggregated, indirect share of any investments held by the Investment Funds exceeds 5% of net assets of the Master Fund as of December 31, 2013.

Investments currently held by the Master Fund are valued as follows:

• INVESTMENT FUNDS—Investments in Investment Funds are carried at fair value, using the net asset value (the “NAV”) as a practical expedient, as provided to the Administrator by the investment managers of such Investment Funds or the administrators of such Investment Funds. These Investment Funds value their underlying investments in accordance with policies established by such Investment Funds. Prior to investing in any Investment Fund, the Adviser Valuation Committee, as part of the due diligence process, conducts a review of the valuation methodologies employed by the Investment Fund to determine whether such methods are appropriate for the asset types. All of the Master Fund’s valuations utilize financial information supplied by each Investment Fund and are net of management and estimated performance incentive fees or allocations payable to the Investment Funds’ managers

41

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

pursuant to the Investment Funds’ agreements. Generally, Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests will use market value when available, and otherwise will use principles of fair value applied in good faith. The Adviser Valuation Committee will consider whether it is appropriate, in light of the relevant circumstances, to value shares at NAV as reported by an Investment Fund for valuation purposes, or whether to adjust such reported value to reflect an adjusted fair value. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, fair value may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had readily available markets for the investments in Investment Funds existed. The Master Fund’s investments in Investment Funds are subject to the terms and conditions of the respective operating agreements and offering memoranda of such Investment Funds. Investment Funds are typically categorized as Level 2 or 3 in the fair value hierarchy based upon liquidity.

• SECURITIES LISTED ON A SECURITIES EXCHANGE OR OVER-THE-COUNTER EXCHANGES—In general, the Master Fund values these securities at their last sales price on the exchange or over-the-counter market on the valuation date. If the security is listed on more than one exchange, the Master Fund uses the price from the exchange that it considers to be the principal exchange on which the security is traded. If there have been no sales for that day on the exchange where the security is principally traded, then the price of the security will be valued at the mean between the closing “bid” and “ask” prices on the valuation date. In these situations, valuations are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Securities traded on a foreign securities exchange will generally be valued at their closing prices on the exchange where such securities are primarily traded, and translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. If an event occurred between the close of the foreign exchange and the valuation date of the Master Fund’s NAV that would materially affect the value of the security and the NAV of the Master Fund, the value of such security and the NAV of the Master Fund will be adjusted to reflect the change in the estimated value of the security. Such fair valued securities are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, based upon the inputs used to value the securities.

• DERIVATIVES—Exchange traded futures contracts are valued using quoted final settlement prices from the national exchange on which they are principally traded and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. If no such price is reported by such exchange on the valuation date, the Adviser Valuation Committee will determine the fair value in good faith using information that is available at such time. Such fair valued investments are typically categorized as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, based upon the inputs used to value the investments.

Options that are listed on a securities exchange are generally valued at the closing “bid” and “ask” prices for options held long and short, respectively on the valuation date and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. If no such bid or ask price is reported, the positions are valued at the last sales price on the valuation date. If no such sales price is reported by such exchange on the valuation date, the Adviser Valuation Committee in conjunction with the Administrator will determine the fair value of such investments in good faith using information that is available at such time. Such fair valued options are typically categorized as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, based upon the inputs used to value the investments.

Non exchange-traded derivatives, such as swap agreements, are valued based on procedures approved by the Board and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Credit default swaps and total return swaps are generally fair valued using evaluated quotes provided by an independent pricing service. If a quotation is not available from the independent pricing service, the price is obtained from a broker (typically the counterparty to the swap agreement) on the valuation date.

42

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at the current day’s interpolated foreign exchange rate, which is calculated using the current day’s spot rate and the 30 day forward rate, or the 30 to 720 day forward rates converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of such currencies on the valuation date. Such valuations are provided by a pricing service approved by the Board, and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

• OTHER—Investments in open-end registered investment companies (“RICs”) that do not trade on an exchange are valued at the end of day NAV per share and are categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Where no value is readily available from a RIC or other security, or where a value supplied by a RIC is deemed not to be indicative of the RICs value, the Adviser Valuation Committee and/or the Board Valuation Committee, in consultation with the Administrator or the Adviser, will determine, in good faith, the fair value of the RIC or other security. Such fair valued investments are typically categorized as Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, based upon the inputs used to value the investments.

Fixed-income securities are valued according to prices as furnished by an independent pricing service or broker/dealer quotes and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Fixed-income securities maturing within a relatively short time frame may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value, and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

• SECURITIES NOT ACTIVELY TRADED—The value of securities, derivatives or synthetic securities that are not actively traded on an exchange shall be determined by obtaining quotes from brokers that normally deal in such securities or by an unaffiliated pricing service that may use actual trade data or procedures using market indices, matrices, yield curves, specific trading characteristics of certain groups of securities, pricing models or a combination of these procedures pursuant to the fair valuation procedures approved by the Board. In each of these situations, valuations are typically categorized as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, based upon the inputs used to value the investments.

(e) FOREIGN CURRENCY

The accounting records of the Master Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency amounts and investments denominated in a foreign currency, if any, are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at current exchange rates on the valuation date. Purchases and sales of investments denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the exchange rate on the respective dates of such transactions.

(f) DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

All open derivative positions at period-end are presented in the Master Fund’s Schedules of Investments. In addition to the derivatives held by the Master Fund, the Investment Funds may have directly engaged in derivative transactions during the period. The following is a description of the derivative instruments the Master Fund utilizes as part of its investment strategy, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type.

OPTIONS CONTRACTS—The Master Fund invests in options contracts to speculate on the price movements of a financial instrument or for use as an economic hedge against certain positions held in the Master Fund’s portfolio. Options contracts purchased give the Master Fund the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the underlying instrument for a specified price upon exercise at any time during the option period. Options contracts written obligate the Master Fund to buy or sell the underlying instrument for a specified price upon

43

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

exercise at any time during the option period. When the Master Fund writes an options contract, an amount equal to the premium received by the Master Fund is recorded as a liability and is subsequently adjusted to the current fair value of the option contract written.

FORWARD FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE CONTRACTS—The Master Fund enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts in connection with its investment objective in order to gain more or less exposure to foreign currencies. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gains or losses until the contract settlement date. The Master Fund could be exposed to risks if the counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts and from unanticipated movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar. The Master Fund remains subject to credit risk with respect to the amount it expects to receive from counterparties. However, the Master Fund has sought to mitigate these risks by generally requiring the posting of collateral at prearranged exposure levels to cover its exposure to the counterparty.

FUTURES CONTRACTS—The Master Fund invests in futures contracts as part of its strategy to manage exposure to interest rate, equity and market price movements, and commodity prices. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Master Fund is required to pledge to the broker an amount of cash and/or other assets equal to a certain percentage of the contract amount (initial margin deposit). Subsequent payments, known as “variation margin,” are made or received by the Master Fund, depending on fluctuations in the value of the underlying asset. The underlying assets are not physically delivered. The Master Fund recognizes a gain or loss equal to the variation margin. Should market conditions move unexpectedly, the Master Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. The use of futures transactions involves, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock index or equity futures contracts, interest rate risk related to bond futures contracts, and commodity price risk related to commodity futures contracts) and exposure to loss. The face or contract amount reflects the extent of the total exposure the Master Fund has in the particular classes of instruments. Among other risks, the use of futures contracts may cause the Master Fund to have imperfect correlation due to differences between movements in the price of the futures contracts and the market value of the underlying securities and the possibility of an illiquid market for a futures contract. With futures contracts, there is minimal counterparty risk to the Master Fund since the futures contracts are exchange-traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, as the counterparty to all exchange-traded futures, guarantees the futures against default.

SWAP AGREEMENTS—The Master Fund invests in swap agreements, primarily credit default and total return swap agreements, as a part of its hedging strategy to manage credit and market risks.

A credit default swap agreement gives one party (the buyer) the right to recoup the economic value of a decline in the value of debt securities of the reference issuer if a credit event (a downgrade, bankruptcy or default) occurs. This value is obtained by delivering a debt security of the reference issuer to the party in return for a previously agreed upon payment from the other party (frequently, the par value of the debt security) or receipt of a net amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity less its recovery value. The Master Fund is usually a net seller of credit default swap agreements.

The Master Fund as a seller of a credit default swap agreement would have the right to pay the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation to the counterparty in the event of a default or other credit

44

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

event by the reference issuer with respect to its debt obligations. In return, the Master Fund would receive from the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the agreement provided that no event of default or other credit event has occurred. If no default or other credit event occurs, the Master Fund would keep the stream of payments and would have no further obligations to the counterparty. As a seller, the Master Fund is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap agreement.

A total return swap agreement is a bilateral financial contract agreement where one party (the payer) agrees to pay the other (the receiver) the total return on a specified asset or index in exchange for a fixed or floating rate of return. A total return swap agreement allows the receiver or payer to derive the economic benefit of owning or having short exposure to an asset without owning or shorting the underlying asset directly. The receiver is entitled to the amount, if any, by which the notional amount of the total return swap agreement would have increased in value had it been invested in the particular instruments, plus an amount equal to any dividends or interest that would have been received on those instruments. In return, the payer is entitled to an amount equal to a fixed or floating rate of interest (e.g., a LIBOR based rate) on the notional amount of the swap agreement plus the amount, if any, by which the notional amount would have decreased in value had it been invested in such instruments, less any dividends or interest. The amounts to which each party is entitled are normally netted against each other, at periodic settlement dates, resulting in a single amount that is either due to or from each party.

An interest rate swap involves the exchange of commitments to pay and receive interest based on a notional amount and is subject to interest rate risk exposure. If the other party to an interest rate swap defaults, the Master Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of interest payments that the Master Fund is contractually entitled to receive.

Swap agreements do not involve the physical delivery of assets, thereby limiting the risk of loss to the Master Fund to the net amount of payments it is contractually obligated to make. The use of swap agreements involves, to varying degrees, elements of market risk, equity risk and counterparty risk. The Master Fund remains subject to credit risk with respect to the net amount expected to be received from the other party. The Master Fund considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a swap agreement in evaluating potential credit risk, and will not enter into any swap agreement unless the Adviser believes the counterparty to the transaction is creditworthy, or unless the swap agreement is centrally cleared. With uncleared swap agreements, the Master Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under the swap agreement if the counterparty fails to perform. The counterparty risk for cleared swap agreements is generally lower than for uncleared over-the-counter swap agreements as the clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade looks only to a clearing house for performance of financial obligations. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing house, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Master Fund. However, the Master Fund seeks to minimize this risk by generally requiring collateral, in the form of cash, to be held in a broker segregated account for swap agreements. The use of swaps is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary securities transactions.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Master Fund’s direct investments in derivatives consisted of the purchase and sale of call options contracts, the purchase and sale of futures contracts, the purchase and sale of forward foreign currency exchange contracts and the purchase and sale of total return, interest rate and credit default swap agreements. Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests may also purchase and sell derivative instruments and other financial instruments.

45

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

The following is a summary of the fair value of derivative instruments held directly by the Master Fund as of December 31, 2013. These derivatives are presented in the Schedule of Investments.

	Assets						Liabilities
	Investments in Derivative Contracts at Fair Value		Unrealized Appreciation on Futures Contracts		Unrealized Gain on Swap Agreements		Unrealized Depreciation on Futures Contracts		Unrealized Loss on Swap Agreements
Equity Risk Exposure:
Futures Contracts*	$	—	$	9,206,091	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total Return Swap Agreements		—		—		268,006		—		—
Commodity Risk Exposure:
Futures Contracts*		—		—		—		1,212,498		—
Interest Rate Risk Exposure:
Call Options Purchased		20,750,470		—		—		—		—
Credit Risk Exposure:
Credit Default Swap Agreements		—		—		1,391,861		—		50,941

* Includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation on futures contracts.

The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Realized Gain (Loss) from Derivatives			Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation from Derivatives
Equity Risk Exposure:
Futures Contracts	$	78,950,173		$	10,276,474
Total Return Swap Agreements		(4,415,071	)		268,006
Commodity Risk Exposure:
Futures Contracts		(58,144,975	)		4,488,134
Interest Rate Risk Exposure:
Futures Contracts		(51,001,654	)		6,723,012
Interest Rate Swap Agreements		(63,750,306	)		—
Call Options Purchased		—			8,758,398
Credit Risk Exposure:
Credit Default Swap Agreements		8,695,744			1,340,920
Foreign Exchange Rate Exposure:
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts		(8,860,029	)		—

Effective January 1, 2013 the Master Fund adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11 “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”), which was subsequently clarified by ASU No. 2013-01 “Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”

46

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(“ASU 2013-01”). ASU 2013-01 requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of that entity’s financial statements to understand the effect of the arrangements on its financial position.

As described above, the Master Fund utilized derivative instruments to achieve its investment objective during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Master Fund may enter into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreements (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar agreements with its derivative contract counterparties whereby the Master Fund may, under certain circumstances, offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instruments’ payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment. Under the ISDA Master Agreements in place at December 31, 2013, the Master Funds is subject to master netting agreements that allow for amounts owed between the Master Fund and its counterparty to be netted. The party that has the larger payable pays the excess of the larger amount over the smaller amount to the other party. The master netting agreements do not apply to amounts owed to or from different counterparties. At December 31, 2013, the Master Fund had one ISDA Master Agreement in place with Goldman Sachs for which master netting agreements (“MNA”) apply only to amounts owed in the same currency and in respect of the same transaction.

The following table provides additional disclosures regarding the derivative assets net of amounts available for offset under a MNA and net of the collateral received as of December 31, 2013:

	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Available for Offset			Net Amounts of Assets^		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Swap Agreement	$	1,659,867	$	(50,941	)	$	1,608,926	$	—	$	1,608,926

^ Amounts for swap agreements are reflected in the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Partners’ Capital as Net Unrealized Gain on Swap Agreements.

The following table provides additional disclosures regarding the offsetting of derivative liabilities net of amounts available for offset under a MNA and net of collateral pledged as of December 31, 2013:

	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Available for Offset			Net Amounts of Liabilities*		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Swap Agreement	$	50,941	$	(50,941	)	$	—	$	—	$	—

* Amounts for swap agreements are reflected in the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Partners’ Capital as Net Unrealized Loss on Swap Agreements.

The average monthly fair value of options purchased was $17,422,241 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The following is a summary of the average monthly notional value of futures contracts purchased and sold, swap agreements and forward foreign currency exchange contracts in the Master Fund for the year ended December 31, 2013, as well as the notional amount of futures contracts, swap agreements and forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2013:

	Average Monthly Notional Value		Notional Value Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Futures contracts sold	$	360,433,572	$	—
Futures contracts purchased		1,632,364,266		403,257,587
Credit default swap agreements		296,042,477		45,330,453
Total return swap agreements		42,768,654		25,427,075
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts		122,908,028		—

47

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(g) CFTC REGULATION

On August 13, 2013, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted rules to harmonize conflicting Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and CFTC disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements for registered investment companies that do not meet an exemption from the definition of commodity pool. The harmonization rules provide that the CFTC will accept the SEC’s disclosure, reporting, and recordkeeping regime as substituted compliance for substantially all of the otherwise applicable CFTC regulations as long as such investment companies meet the applicable SEC requirements.

Previously, in November 2012, the CFTC issued relief for fund of fund operators, including advisers to registered investment companies, that may otherwise be required to register with the CFTC as commodity pool operators but do not have access to information from the investment funds in which they are invested in order to determine whether such registration is required. This relief delayed the registration date for such operators until the later of June 30, 2013 or six months from the date the CFTC issues revised guidance on the application of certain thresholds with respect to investments in commodities held by funds of funds. In December 2012, the Master Fund filed as required with the CFTC in order to claim this no-action relief, which was effective upon receipt of the filing. Although the CFTC now has adopted harmonization rules applicable to investment companies that are deemed to be commodity pools, the CFTC has not yet issued guidance on how funds of funds are to determine whether they are deemed to be commodity pools. As of December 31, 2013, the Master Fund is not considered a commodity pool and continues to rely on the fund of fund no-action relief.

(h) INVESTMENT INCOME

For investments in securities, dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, net of withholding taxes. Interest income is recorded as earned on the accrual basis and includes amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.

(i) FUND EXPENSES

Unless otherwise voluntarily or contractually assumed by the Adviser or another party, the Master Fund bears all expenses incurred in its business including, but not limited to, the following: all costs and expenses related to investment transactions and positions for the Master Fund’s account; legal fees; accounting, auditing and tax preparation fees; recordkeeping and custodial fees; costs of computing the Master Fund’s net asset value; fees for data and software providers; research expenses; costs of insurance; registration expenses; offering costs; expenses of meetings of partners; directors fees; all costs with respect to communications to partners; transfer taxes; offshore withholding taxes and taxes withheld on non-U.S. dividends; interest and commitment fees on loans and debit balances; and other types of expenses as may be approved from time to time by the Board. Offering costs are amortized over a twelve-month period or less from the date they are incurred.

(j) INCOME TAXES

The Master Fund is organized and operates as a limited partnership and is not subject to income taxes as a separate entity. Such taxes are the responsibility of the individual partners. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the Master Fund’s financial statements. Investments in foreign securities may result in foreign taxes being withheld by the issuer of such securities. For U.S. offshore withholding tax, the Master Fund may serve as withholding agent for its offshore feeder funds.

48

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

For the current open tax year and for all major jurisdictions, management of the Master Fund has evaluated the tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Master Fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions will “more-likely-than-not” be sustained by the Master Fund upon challenge by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold and that would result in a tax benefit or expense to the Master Fund would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current period. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Master Fund did not recognize any amounts for unrecognized tax benefit/expense. A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefit/expense is not provided herein, as the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefit/expense are zero, with no interim additions, reductions or settlements. Tax positions taken in tax years which remain open under the statute of limitations (generally three years for federal income tax purposes) are subject to examination by federal and state tax jurisdictions.

(k) USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be significant.

(3) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Master Fund defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.

The inputs used to determine the fair value of the Master Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

• Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

• Level 2—investments with other significant observable inputs or investments that can be fully redeemed at the NAV in the “near term”

• Level 3—investments with significant unobservable inputs (which may include the Master Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) or investments that cannot be fully redeemed at the NAV in the “near term”; these are investments that generally have one or more of the following characteristics: gated redemptions, suspended redemptions, or lock-up periods greater than quarterly

Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.

The Master Fund establishes valuation processes and procedures to ensure that the valuation techniques for investments categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are fair, consistent, and appropriate. The Adviser is responsible for developing the Master Fund’s written valuation processes and procedures, conducting periodic reviews of the valuation policies, and evaluating the overall fairness and consistent application of the valuation policies. The Board Valuation Committee has authorized the Adviser to oversee the implementation of the Board approved valuation procedures by the Administrator. The Adviser Valuation Committee is comprised of various Master Fund personnel, which include members from the Master Fund’s portfolio management and

49

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

operations groups. The Adviser Valuation Committee meets monthly or as needed, to determine the valuations of the Master Fund’s Level 3 investments. The valuations are required to be supported by market data, industry accepted third party valuation models, or other methods the Adviser Valuation Committee deems to be appropriate, including the use of internal proprietary valuation models.

The following is a summary categorization as of December 31, 2013, of the Master Fund’s investments based on the level of inputs utilized in determining the value of such investments:

	LEVEL 1				LEVEL 2				LEVEL 3		Total
	Investments		Other Financial Instruments^		Investments		Other Financial Instruments^		Investments		Investments		Other Financial Instruments^
Investment Funds
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
Arbitrage Strategies	$	—	$	—	$	73,704,930	$	—	$	163,547,560	$	237,252,490	$	—
Domestic Equity		—		—		—		—		27,732,522		27,732,522		—
Energy		—		—		39,049,655		—		197,503,596		236,553,251		—
Enhanced Fixed Income		—		—		52,582,883		—		92,523,536		145,106,419		—
Global Opportunistic		—		—		64,681,880		—		147,439,451		212,121,331		—
International Equity		—		—		—		—		42,671,381		42,671,381		—
Natural Resources		—		—		—		—		30,181,208		30,181,208		—
Private Equity		—		—		—		—		727,754,609		727,754,609		—
Real Estate		—		—		—		—		182,601,579		182,601,579		—
Passive Foreign Investment Companies
Arbitrage Strategies		—		—		—		—		22,127,566		22,127,566		—
International Equity		—		—		—		—		615,629		615,629		—
Natural Resources		—		—		—		—		4,000,974		4,000,974		—
Private Corporations
Real Estate		—		—		—		—		13,216,244		13,216,244		—
Investment Securities
Common Stocks
Domestic Equity		61,908		—		—		—		—		61,908		—
Technology		129,024		—		—		—		—		129,024		—
Registered Investment Companies
Money Market Funds		189,272,108		—		—		—		—		189,272,108		—
Derivative Instruments
Call Options Purchased		—		—		20,750,470		—		—		20,750,470		—
Warrants Purchased
Global Opportunistic		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Futures Contracts		—		7,993,593		—		—		—		—		7,993,593
Total Return Swap Agreements		—		—		—		268,006		—		—		268,006
Credit Default Swap Agreements		—		—		—		1,340,920		—		—		1,340,920
Total	$	189,463,040	$	7,993,593	$	250,769,818	$	1,608,926	$	1,651,915,855	$	2,092,148,713	$	9,602,519

^ Other financial instruments include any derivative instruments not reflected in the Schedule of Investments as Investments in Securities, such as futures contracts and swap agreements. These financial instruments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the financial instrument.

50

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

The categorization of investments amongst Levels 1 through 3 does not reflect the fact that many of the underlying investments held by the Investment Funds included in Level 3, if owned directly by the Master Fund, may be classified as Level 1 or Level 2 investments.

The following table is a summary of quantitative information about significant unobservable valuation inputs approved by the Adviser Valuation Committee for Level 3 fair value measurements for investments held as of December 31, 2013:

	Fair Value as of December 31, 2013		Valuation Technique	Liquidity of Investments	Adjustments To NAV**
Investments
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
Arbitrage Strategies	$	163,547,560	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Quarterly or Greater	None
Domestic Equity		27,732,522	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Quarterly or Greater	None
Energy		197,503,596	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Enhanced Fixed Income		92,523,536	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Quarterly or Greater	None
Global Opportunistic		147,439,451	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Monthly or Greater	None
International Equity		42,671,381	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Quarterly or Greater	None
Natural Resources		30,181,208	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Private Equity		727,754,609	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Real Estate		182,601,579	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Passive Foreign Investment Companies
Arbitrage Strategies		22,127,566	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
International Equity		615,629	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Natural Resources		4,000,974	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Private Corporations
Real Estate		13,216,244	NAV as Practical Expedient*	Non-redeemable	None
Total Investments	$	1,651,915,855

* Unobservable valuation input.

** Amounts represent adjustments, if any, made to NAV provided by the investment manager or administrator of the Investment Funds. Adjustments to the practical expedient NAV may be made under certain circumstances including, but not limited to, the following: the practical expedient NAV received is not as of the Master Fund’s measurement date; it is probable that the Investment Fund will be sold at a value significantly different than the reported expedient NAV; it is determined by the Board Valuation Committee that the Investment Fund is not being valued at fair value by the Investment Fund manager.

The Master Fund discloses transfers between levels based on valuations at the end of the reporting period. Transfers that occurred between Levels 2 and 3 during the year ended December 31, 2013, based on levels

51

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

assigned to Investments on December 31, 2012, are included in the table below. The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 investments based on the inputs used to determine fair value:

	Investments
	Balance as of December 31, 2012		Redemptions In-Kind		Transfers In*		Gross Purchases		Gross Sales**			Net Realized Gain (Loss)			Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation			Balance as of December 31, 2013
Investments
Limited Partnerships, Exempted Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
Arbitrage Strategies	$	125,266,503	$	—	$	968,383	$	75,046,571	$	(43,106,335	)	$	261,452		$	5,110,986		$	163,547,560
Domestic Equity		89,660,048		—		—		10,175		(73,162,927	)		6,471,196			4,754,030			27,732,522
Energy		159,143,681		—		—		33,014,799		(30,521,738	)		15,117,548			20,749,306			197,503,596
Enhanced Fixed Income		199,052,762		—		7,613,470		10,220,979		(121,010,612	)		27,575,689			(30,928,752	)		92,523,536
Global Opportunistic		274,309,743		—		7,644,288		155,322,404		(296,992,531	)		75,984,386			(68,828,839	)		147,439,451
International Equity		49,713,569		—		3,908,401		—		(16,049,381	)		(934,554	)		6,033,346			42,671,381
Natural Resources		29,024,662		—		—		3,355,101		(1,546,445	)		626,986			(1,279,096	)		30,181,208
Private Equity		681,514,504		—		—		65,581,196		(134,858,933	)		43,401,313			72,116,529			727,754,609
Real Estate		185,296,050		—		—		24,674,248		(39,797,945	)		5,230,242			7,198,984			182,601,579
Passive Foreign Investment Companies
Arbitrage Strategies		32,253,834		—		755,517		15,757,811		(27,834,207	)		2,120,146			(925,535	)		22,127,566
International Equity		819,194		—		—		—		(189,968	)		71,124			(84,721	)		615,629
Natural Resources		8,910,279		—		—		—		(4,728,401	)		948,810			(1,129,714	)		4,000,974
Private Equity		3,000,000		—		—		—		(3,750,000	)		(6,250,000	)		7,000,000			—
Private Corporations
Real Estate		19,111,732		—		—		344,743		(4,446,491	)		—			(1,793,740	)		13,216,244
Total Investments	$	1,857,076,561	$	—	$	20,890,059	$	383,328,027	$	(797,995,914	)	$	170,624,338		$	17,992,784		$	1,651,915,855

* Transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy generally relate to changes in liquidity provisions of the Investment Funds.

** Includes Return of Capital and Capital Gain Distributions.

The net realized gain (loss) and change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation in the table above are reflected in the accompanying Statement of Operations. The change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from Level 3 investments held at December 31, 2013 is $57,232,649.

The Master Fund is permitted to invest in alternative investments that may not have a readily determinable fair value. For an investment that does not have a readily determinable fair value, the Master Fund uses the NAV reported by the Investment Fund as a practical expedient, without further adjustment, unless it is probable that the investment will be sold at a value significantly different than the reported NAV. If the practical expedient NAV is not as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, then the NAV is adjusted to reflect any significant events that would materially affect the value of the security and the NAV of the Master Fund as of the valuation date.

Certain Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests have limitations on liquidity which may result in limitations on redemptions including, but not limited to, early redemption fees. Other than Investment Funds that are self-liquidating, such as Private Equity and some Energy, Natural Resources and Real Estate Funds, the Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests have withdrawal rights ranging from monthly to annually, after a notice period, usually for a period of up to two years from the date of the initial investment or an

52

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

additional investment. A listing of the investments held by the Master Fund and their attributes as of December 31, 2013, that may qualify for this valuation approach is shown in the table below.

Investment Category	Investment Strategy	Fair Value (in 000s)		Unfunded Commitments (in 000s)	Remaining Life*		Redemption Frequency*	Notice Period (in Days)*	Redemption Restrictions and Terms*
Arbitrage Strategies(a)	Investments in a variety of securities with the intent of profiting from relative changes in the price of a set of securities, currencies or commodities.	$	259,380	N/A		N/A	Quarterly	30-90	0-2 years; up to 9% early redemption fee
Domestic Equity(b)	Investments in equity securities issued by U.S. companies.		27,733	N/A		N/A	Quarterly	45-120	0-3 years; up to 5% early redemption fee; possible 20% investor level gate
Energy (c)	Investments in securities issued by companies in the energy sector.		236,553	$65,304		up to 15 years	N/A	N/A	0-15 years
Enhanced Fixed Income(d)	Investments in non-traditional fixed income securities.		145,106	N/A		N/A	Quarterly	30-120	0-3 years; up to 6% early redemption fee; possible 8% investor level gate
Global Opportunistic(e)	Investments in a variety of global markets across all security types.		212,121	N/A		N/A	Quarterly	45-90	0-3 years; up to 6% early redemption fee; possible 25% investor level gate
International Equity(f)	Investments in equity securities issued by foreign companies.		43,287	N/A		N/A	Quarterly	60	0-2 years; up to 2% early redemption fee; possible 25% investor level gate

53

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

Investment Category	Investment Strategy	Fair Value (in 000s)		Unfunded Commitments (in 000s)	Remaining Life*	Redemption Frequency*	Notice Period (in Days)*	Redemption Restrictions and Terms*
Natural Resources(g)	Investments with exposure to non-energy natural resources.	$	34,182	$    6,423	up to 10 years	N/A	N/A	0-10 years
Private Equity(h)	Investments in nonpublic companies.		727,755	188,259	up to 10 years	N/A	N/A	0-10 years
Real Estate(i)	Investments in REITs, private partnerships, and various real estate related mortgage securities.		195,818	44,601	up to 10 years	N/A	N/A	0-10 years
		$	1,881,935	$304,587

* The information summarized in the table above represents the general terms for the specified asset class. Individual Investment Funds may have terms that are more or less restrictive than those terms indicated for the asset class as a whole. In addition, most Investment Funds have the flexibility, as provided for in their constituent documents, to modify and waive such terms.

(a) This category includes Investment Funds that invest using two primary Styles (Event-Driven and Relative Value). Event-Driven strategies typically will include investments in common and preferred equities and various types of debt (often based on the probability that a particular event will occur). These may include distressed or Special Situations investments (securities of companies that are experiencing difficult business situations). Relative Value strategies may include long and short positions in common and preferred equity, convertible securities, and various forms of senior and junior (typically unsecured) debt. Investments under this style may also include index options, options on futures contracts, and other derivatives.

(b) This category includes Investment Funds that invest primarily in publicly-traded equity securities issued by U.S. companies. These securities will typically trade on one of the major U.S. stock exchanges. Investment Funds in this category may include long/short funds, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.

(c) This category includes Investment Funds that invest primarily in publicly-traded securities issued by companies in the energy sector, private investments in energy-related assets or companies, and futures in energy commodity markets. The Investment Funds include private funds which may hold long/ short equities, commodity trading advisers (“CTAs”) trading contracts on energy related commodities, mutual funds or exchange-traded funds, and private partnerships with private investments in their portfolios.

(d) This category includes Investment Funds that invest primarily in the following sectors: secured leveraged loans, high yield bonds, distressed debt, structured credit, and global debt (typically less efficient areas of the global fixed income markets than traditional fixed income strategies). Generally these sectors may be heavily weighted to certain industries such as telecom and technology with lower credit rating ranges

54

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(including leveraged buyouts), may include distressed debt strategies and may include restricted securities and securities that may not be registered for which a market may not be readily available.

(e) This category includes Investment Funds that invest in global markets and across all security types including equities, fixed income, derivatives, commodities, currencies, futures, and exchange-traded funds. Investment Funds in this category are typically private funds and may include global long/short equity funds, global macro funds, and CTA’s.

(f) This category includes Investment Funds that invest primarily in publicly-traded equity securities issued by foreign companies or securities issued on U.S. stock exchanges that represent ownership of a foreign corporation. Investment Funds in this category may include long/ short funds, mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds.

(g) This category includes Investment Funds that invest primarily in assets with exposure to non-energy natural resources, including gold and other precious metals, industrial metals, and agricultural commodities. The Investment Funds may include private funds invested in long/ short equities; CTA’s trading contracts on agricultural commodities, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, and private partnerships with private investments in their portfolios.

(h) This category includes private equity funds that invest primarily in non-publicly traded companies in need of capital. These Investment Funds may vary widely as to sector, size, stage, duration, and liquidity. Certain of these Investment Funds may also focus on the secondary market, buying interests in existing private equity funds, often at a discount.

(i) This category includes Investment Funds that invest in registered investment companies or managers that invest in real estate trusts (commonly known as “REITs”) and private partnerships that make investments in income producing properties, raw land held for development or appreciation, and various types of mortgage loans and common or preferred stock whose operations involve real estate.

(4) PARTNERS’ CAPITAL ACCOUNTS 

(a) ISSUANCE OF INTERESTS

Upon receipt from an eligible investor of an initial or additional application for interests (the “Interests”), which will generally be accepted as of the first day of each month, the Master Fund will issue new Interests. The Interests have not been registered under the Securities Act, or the securities laws of any state. The Master Fund issues Interests only in private placement transactions in accordance with Regulation D or other applicable exemptions under the Securities Act. No public market exists for the Interests, and none is expected to develop. The Master Fund is not required, and does not intend, to hold annual meetings of its partners. The Interests are subject to substantial restrictions on transferability and resale and may not be transferred or resold except as permitted under the Master Fund’s limited partnership agreement. The Master Fund reserves the right to reject any applications for subscription of Interests.

(b) ALLOCATION OF PROFITS AND LOSSES

For each fiscal period, generally monthly, net profits or net losses of the Master Fund are allocated among and credited to or debited against the capital accounts of all partners as of the last day of each fiscal period in accordance with the partners’ respective capital account ownership percentage for the fiscal period. Net profits or net losses are measured as the net change in the value of the partners’ capital of the Master Fund, including any change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and income, net of expenses, and realized gains or losses during a fiscal period. Net profits or net losses are allocated after giving effect for any initial or additional applications for Interests, which generally occur at the beginning of the month, or any repurchases of Interests.

55

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(c) REPURCHASE OF INTERESTS

A partner will not be eligible to have the Master Fund repurchase all or any portion of an Interest at the partner’s discretion at any time. The Adviser generally recommends to the Board that the Master Fund offer to repurchase Interests each calendar quarter, pursuant to written tenders by partners.

The Board retains the sole discretion to accept or reject the recommendation of the Adviser and to determine the amount of Interests, if any, that will be purchased in any tender offer that it does approve. In the event Interests are repurchased, there will be a substantial period of time between the date as of which partners must accept the Master Fund’s offer to repurchase their Interests and the date they can expect to receive payment for their Interests from the Master Fund.

(5) INVESTMENTS IN PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

(a) INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

As of December 31, 2013 the Master Fund held investments in Investment Funds, securities and other derivatives. The agreements related to investments in Investment Funds provide for compensation to the Investment Funds’ managers/general partners or advisers in the form of management fees of up to 3.0% annually of monthly average net assets. In addition, many Investment Funds also provide for performance incentive fees/ allocations of up to 30% of an Investment Fund’s net profits, although it is possible that such ranges may be exceeded for certain investment managers. These management fees and incentive fees are in addition to the management fees charged by the Master Fund.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investments (excluding short-term investments) were $361,759,934 and $1,381,779,524, respectively.

The cost of the Master Fund’s underlying investments for Federal income tax purposes is adjusted for items of taxable income allocated to the Master Fund from such investments. The allocated taxable income is generally reported to the Master Fund by its underlying investments on Schedules K-1, Forms 1099 or PFIC statements, or a combination thereof.

The underlying investments generally do not provide the Master Fund with tax reporting information until well after year end, and as a result, the Master Fund is unable to calculate the year end tax cost of its investments until well after year end. The Master Fund’s book cost as of December 31, 2013, was $1,871,877,137, resulting in accumulated net unrealized appreciation of $220,271,576 consisting of $398,119,005 in gross unrealized appreciation and $177,847,429 in gross unrealized depreciation.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, certain investments were received through a transfer in-kind in connection with the redemption of certain investments. The fair value of these investments transferred in-kind, related cost and realized gain (loss) were as follows:

Investments Redeemed	Fair Value		Cost		Realized Gain (Loss) on Transfers In-Kind		Investments Received
Passport II, L.P.	$	566,761	$	484,754	$	82,007	Passport Global Strategies III, Ltd.
Q Funding III, L.P.		378,657		297,885		80,772	Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Co.
Q4 Funding, L.P.		106,024		98,171		7,853	Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Co.
	$	1,051,442	$	880,810	$	170,632

56

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(b) INVESTMENT FUND LIQUIDITY

Certain Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests have restrictions on liquidity which may result in limitations or restrictions on redemptions including, but not limited to, lock-ups, notice periods and early redemption fees. The Master Fund’s investments are grouped in three categories of liquidity, as determined by the Adviser. To better manage the Master Fund’s liquidity, the Adviser has also structured the portfolio’s capital into the liquidity categories listed below. The categories and percent of investments in each are as follows at December 31, 2013:

Liquidity Categories*	Total Percentage of Capital Invested Allowed, per Category	Percentage of Investments, per Category			Withdrawal Rights
Category 1 Assets(a)	10.00%-100.00%(b)		49.3	%	Securities and derivatives activity or Investment Funds that settle three business days after trade date (“T+3”) and that have at least quarterly withdrawal rights and not more than a one-year lock-up period remaining.
Category 2 Assets(a)	0.00%-100.00%(b)		5.3	%	Investment Funds that allow for periodic withdrawals at the time of investment but do not meet the qualifications for Category 1 Assets due to frequency of redemptions allowed or extended lock-up periods remaining.
Category 3 Assets(a)	0.00%-25.00%(b)		45.4	%**	Investment Funds that are self-liquidating (e.g., private equity funds), or that otherwise fail to meet the definition of Category 1 or 2 Assets. Also includes Investment Funds that only make distributions as the underlying portfolio’s assets or investments are liquidated (i.e., the investor in such Investment Funds does not have the right to request withdrawals on any specified periodic basis).
			100.0	%

* The expiration or implementation of lock-up periods on Master Fund investments in an Investment Fund could result in such investments moving from one liquidity category to another.

** If at the end of any calendar quarter the Master Fund is not in compliance with the weighting of Category 3 Assets, the Master Fund will endeavor to bring its portfolio back into compliance with these requirements, taking into consideration the best interests of all investors, and during such time will not commit any additional capital to Category 3 Assets. During such time, the Master Fund may fund existing capital commitments to Investment Funds comprising Category 3 Assets. The Master Fund’s portfolio currently is above the desired weighting in Category 3 Assets. The Master Fund is currently funding existing capital commitments to Investment Funds comprising Category 3 Assets, but is not currently committing additional capital to Category 3 Assets.

57

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(a) Category 1 Assets are defined as cash, money market funds, and exchange-traded securities including, but not limited to equities, bonds, notes, mutual funds, ETFs, options (including OTC), and derivatives. Investment Funds with investor-level gates, fund-level gates, redemption fees and/or penalties, sidepockets and/or special purpose vehicles housing less liquid investments may be included in this category as long as they have at least quarterly withdrawal rights with a year or less lockup remaining.

(b) The Master Fund may not have less than 10% of its capital invested in cash and securities with T+3 liquidity, which are included in Category 1 Assets, or more than 25% of its capital invested in Category 3 Assets, with all remaining capital invested in Category 1 Assets or Category 2 Assets.

(c) AFFILIATED INVESTMENT FUNDS

At December 31, 2013, the Master Fund’s investments in certain Investment Funds were deemed to be investments in affiliated issuers under the 1940 Act, primarily because the Master Fund owns 5% or more of the Investment Funds’ total net assets. The activity resulting from investments in these Investment Funds, including interest and dividend income as well as realized gains and losses, is identified in the Statement of Operations as transactions with affiliated investments. A listing of these affiliated Investment Funds (including activity during the year ended December 31, 2013) is shown below:

Investment Funds	Shares 12/31/2012	Shares 12/31/2013	Fair Value 12/31/2012		Redemptions In-Kind		Cost of Purchases		Cost of Sales*			Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments			Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation			Fair Value 12/31/2013		Interest/ Dividend Income
Advent Latin American Private Equity Fund V-F, L.P.			$	6,741,293		—	$	3,150,000	$	(1,792,500	)	$	748,763		$	(337,624	)	$	8,509,932	$	—
BDCM Partners I, L.P.				52,228,921		—		7,628,476		(24,203,260	)		2,556,954			2,319,040			40,530,131		—
Blue Mountain Credit Alternatives Fund, L.P.				—		—		75,000,000		—			—			4,092,477			79,092,477		—
Blueshift Energy Fund, L.P.				—		—		30,000,000		—			—			3,372,298			33,372,298		—
CCM Small Cap Value Qualified Fund, L.P.				15,016,101		—		—		(9,411,514	)		(7,763,121	)		7,368,776			5,210,242		—
Credit Distressed Blue Line Fund, L.P.				23,635,066		—		—		—			—			(10,444,123	)		13,190,943		—
CX Partners Fund Limited				13,201,649		—		5,939,105		(911,260	)		128,547			(94,041	)		18,264,000		239,891
Dace Ventures I, L.P.				1,633,643		—		234,064		(108,287	)		—			(249,457	)		1,509,963		—
Encap Energy Infrastructure TE Feeder, L.P.				5,883,315		—		1,665,898		(1,936,988	)		1,802,967			(1,692,791	)		5,722,401		124,290
Florida Real Estate Value Fund, L.P.				8,267,040		—		—		(3,130,287	)		444,319			2,568,928			8,150,000		—
Fortelus Special Situations Fund, L.P.				8,370,867		—		—		(3,370,239	)		(947,427	)		1,041,596			5,094,797		—
Garrison Opportunity Fund, LLC				23,376,632		—		—		(5,363,809	)		(17,188	)		2,559,226			20,554,861		—
Gavea Investment Fund II A, L.P.				1,569,121		—		—		(398,551	)		398,551			346,879			1,916,000		—
GTIS Brazil Real Estate Fund (Brazilian Real), L.P.				23,955,679		—		—		—			—			(55,679	)		23,900,000		—
Halcyon European Structured Opportunities Fund, L.P.				313,229		—		—		(116,230	)		(249,754	)		142,135			89,380		—
Harbinger Capital Partners Fund I, L.P.				26,663,600		—		—		—			—			(1,422,915	)		25,240,685		—
Hayman Capital Partners, L.P.				57,552,275		—		23,268		—			—			6,236,264			63,811,807		23,268
HealthCor Partners Fund, L.P.				8,386,656		—		150,392		(1,528,308	)		882,934			827,527			8,719,201		—

58

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

Investment Funds	Shares 12/31/2012		Shares 12/31/2013		Fair Value 12/31/2012		Redemptions In-Kind		Cost of Purchases		Cost of Sales*			Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments			Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation			Fair Value 12/31/2013		Interest/ Dividend Income
Hillcrest Fund, L.P.					$	11,037,970		—	$	—	$	(1,718,280	)	$	824,825		$	2,060,919		$	12,205,434	$	—
Integral Capital Partners VIII, L.P.						3,142,555		—		—		(413,810	)		—			143,255			2,872,000		—
Intervale Capital Fund, L.P.						12,192,477		—		380,404		(935,146	)		507,930			3,143,181			15,288,846		315,898
Kenmont Onshore Fund, L.P.						213,776		—		—		(182,626	)		57,042			(69,508	)		18,684		—
Kepos Alpha Fund, L.P.						—		—		125,000,000		(35,000,000	)		(3,492,256	)		(7,848,519	)		78,659,225		—
LC Fund IV, L.P.						25,438,063		—		1,407,287		(467,090	)		326,642			(1,171,260	)		25,533,642		298,002
Magnetar Capital Fund, L.P.						8,869,901		—		—		(3,893,552	)		1,383,342			1,232,277			7,591,968		—
Magnetar SPV, LLC (Series L)						13,008,600		—		—		(10,662,046	)		683,211			(983,031	)		2,046,734		—
Middle East North Africa Opportunities Fund, L.P.		5,089		5,089		1,516,120		—		—		—			—			(200,386	)		1,315,734		—
Monsoon Infrastructure & Realty Co-Investors, L.P.						16,036,064		—		748,752		—			—			(1,790,412	)		14,994,404		—
Montrica Global Opportunities Fund, L.P.		33,558		25,428		1,709,302		—		—		(372,669	)		(440,277	)		(226,986	)		669,370		—
Orbis Real Estate Fund I						2,988,770		—		69,273		(294,675	)		—			(582,723	)		2,180,645		—
Passport Global Strategies III, Ltd.		1,211		2,244		751,847		566,761		—		—			—			(448,535	)		870,073		—
Pearlmark Mezzanine Realty Partners III, LLC						16,113,000		—		1,582,279		(3,863,635	)		—			373,956			14,205,600		1,563,028
Pennybacker II, L.P.						3,726,729		—		4,898,179		(2,018,847	)		355,399			764,819			7,726,279		250,495
Phoenix Real Estate Fund (T), L.P.						14,003,922		—		—		(6,481,395	)		—			(690,288	)		6,832,239		—
PIPE Equity Partners, L.L.C.						18,231,147		—		—		(4,225,724	)		(5,644,165	)		4,050,188			12,411,446		—
PIPE Select Fund, L.L.C.						34,326,724		—		—		(3,887,722	)		255,152			(2,811,068	)		27,883,086		—
Private Equity Investment Fund IV, L.P.						5,783,277		—		250,322		(700,727	)		(275,679	)		352,038			5,409,231		18,595
Private Equity Investment Fund V, L.P.**						38,463,168		—		2,707,100		(2,511,959	)		1,249,303			8,067			39,915,679		53,342
Providence MBS Fund L.P.						110,686,933		—		—		(60,000,000	)		16,568,567			(14,672,617	)		52,582,883		—
Quantum Parallel Partners V, L.P.						13,269,063		—		11,494,907		—			—			4,826,664			29,590,634		—
Saints Capital VI, L.P.						19,331,961		—		312,543		(3,535,001	)		2,638,257			(2,306,981	)		16,440,779		3,765
SBC Latin America Housing US Fund, L.P.						4,390,948		—		2,389,667		(266,667	)		—			1,127,924			7,641,872		—
Sovereign Capital Limited Partnership III						8,448,021		—		3,301,423		—			—			5,674,984			17,424,428		—
Tenaska Power Fund II-A, L.P.						17,855,284		—		7,904,292		(3,315,025	)		3,544			(3,764,430	)		18,683,665		53,433
Trivest Fund IV, L.P.						18,805,260		—		4,290,353		(5,976,852	)		—			2,273,922			19,392,683		1,046,091
Trustbridge Partners III, L.P.						30,761,365		—		2,484,873		(10,001,463	)		4,857,963			12,140,474			40,243,212		245,981
Tuckerbrook SB Global Distressed Fund I, L.P.						5,734,262		—		—		(1,125,000	)		—			684,325			5,293,587		—

59

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

Investment Funds	Shares 12/31/2012	Shares 12/31/2013	Fair Value 12/31/2012		Redemptions In-Kind		Cost of Purchases		Cost of Sales*			Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments		Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation			Fair Value 12/31/2013		Interest/ Dividend Income
Tybourne Equity (U.S.) Fund			$	41,247,237		—	$	—	$	(14,689,559	)	$	1,759,382	$	3,886,739		$	32,203,799	$	—
Velite Energy, L.P.				52,142,437		—		—		—			—		(13,092,782	)		39,049,655		—
Westview Capital Partners II, L.P.				20,785,579		—		3,943,595		—			—		2,406,423			27,135,597		920,572
			$	847,806,849	$	566,761	$	296,956,452	$	(228,810,703	)	$	19,603,727	$	11,069,145		$	947,192,231	$	5,156,651

* Sales include return of capital.

** Voting rights have been waived for this investment.

(6) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

In the normal course of business, the Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests may trade various derivative securities and other financial instruments, and may enter into various investment activities with off-balance sheet risk both as an investor and as a principal. The Master Fund’s risk of loss in these Investment Funds is limited to the value of its investment in such Investment Funds. In addition, by investing directly in derivative instruments, the Master Fund is subject to credit risk with respect to the net amount expected to be received from the other party. The Master Fund may be negatively impacted if the other party defaults or fails to perform its obligations under such agreement.

(7) DUE FROM BROKERS

The Master Fund conducts business with brokers for its investment activities. The clearing and depository operations for the investment activities are performed pursuant to agreements with the brokers. The Master Fund is subject to credit risk to the extent any broker with whom the Master Fund conducts business is unable to deliver cash balances or securities, or clear security transactions on the Master Fund’s behalf. The Master Fund monitors the financial condition of the brokers with which the Master Fund conducts business and believes the likelihood of loss under the aforementioned circumstances is remote.

(8) ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT

In consideration for administrative, accounting, and recordkeeping services, the Master Fund pays the Administrator a monthly administration fee based on the month-end partners’ capital of the Master Fund. The Master Fund is charged, on an annual basis, 6 basis points on partners’ capital of up to $2 billion, 5 basis points on partners’ capital between the amounts of $2 billion and $5 billion, 2 basis points on partners’ capital between the amounts of $5 billion and $15 billion, and 1.25 basis points for amounts over $15 billion. The administration fee is payable monthly in arrears. The Administrator also provides the Master Fund with legal, compliance, transfer agency, and other investor related services at an additional cost.

The administration fees are paid out of the Master Fund’s assets, which decreases the net profits or increases the net losses of the partners in the Master Fund. As of December 31, 2013, the Master Fund had $2,064,041,426 in partners’ capital. The total administration fee incurred for the year ended December 31, 2013, was $1,645,176.

60

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

(9) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(a) INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEE

In consideration of the advisory and other services provided by the Adviser to the Master Fund pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement, the Master Fund pays the Adviser an investment management fee (the “Investment Management Fee”), equal to 1.00% on an annualized basis of the Master Fund’s partners’ capital calculated based on the Master Fund’s partners’ capital at the end of each month, payable quarterly in arrears. The Investment Management Fee decreases the net profits or increases the net losses of the Master Fund that are credited to or debited against the capital accounts of its partners. For the year ended December 31, 2013, $28,677,960 was incurred for Investment Management Fees.

(b) PLACEMENT AGENTS

The Master Fund may engage one or more placement agents (each, a “Placement Agent”) to solicit investments in the Master Fund. Salient Capital, L.P., an affiliate of the Adviser, is a broker-dealer who has been engaged by the Master Fund to serve as a Placement Agent. A Placement Agent may engage one or more sub-placement agents. The Adviser or its affiliates may pay a fee out of their own resources to Placement Agents and sub-placement agents. As of December 31, 2013, the two largest non-affiliated sub-placement agents service approximately 80.57% of the feeder funds assets which are invested in the Master Fund. To the extent that substantial numbers of investors have a relationship with a particular sub-placement agent, such sub-placement agent may have the ability to influence investor behavior, which may affect the Master Fund.

(10) CREDIT FACILITY

As a fundamental policy, the Master Fund may borrow up to, but not more than, 25% of the partners’ capital of the Master Fund (at the time such borrowings were made and after taking into account the investment and/or deployment of such proceeds) for the purpose of making investments, funding redemptions and for other working capital and general Master Fund purposes. For purposes of the Master Fund’s investment restrictions and certain investment limitations under the 1940 Act, including for example, the Master Fund’s leverage limitations, the Master Fund will not “look through” Investment Funds in which the Master Fund invests. Investment Funds may also use leverage, whether through borrowings, futures, or other derivative products and are not subject to the Master Fund’s investment restrictions. However, such borrowings by Investment Funds are without recourse to the Master Fund and the Master Fund’s risk of loss is limited to its investment in such Investment Funds, other than for some Investment Funds in which the Master Fund has made a capital commitment, for which the risk of loss is limited to the Master Fund’s total capital commitment. For some Investment Funds in which the Master Fund has made a capital commitment that will be funded over a period of time, such as private equity, private energy and real estate funds, the Master Fund, in certain instances, may commit to fund more than its initial capital commitment. The rights of any lenders to the Master Fund to receive payments of interest or repayments of principal will be senior to those of the partners, and the terms of any borrowings may contain provisions that limit certain activities of the Master Fund.

The Master Fund maintained a line of credit agreement (the “Agreement”) with Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft which provided a $500,000,000 credit facility, with available borrowing capacity subject to collateral allocation ratios as defined in the Agreement. Borrowings under the Agreement were secured by the Master Fund’s investments. The Agreement provided for a commitment fee of 0.65% plus interest accruing on any borrowed amounts at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of 1.10% per

61

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

annum, payable quarterly in arrears. At the discretion of the Master Fund, the Agreement with Deutsche Bank was terminated in May 2013. There were no borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2013.

(11) FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

	Year ended December 31, 2013		Year ended December 31, 2012		Year ended December 31, 2011		Year ended December 31, 2010		Year ended December 31, 2009
Net investment loss to average partners’ capital1		(0.74)%		(0.81)%		(0.75)%		(0.84)%		(0.95)%
Expenses to average partners’ capital1,2		1.37%		1.49%		1.27%		1.19%		1.20%
Portfolio turnover		16.95%		20.88%		26.72%		26.71%		27.40%
Total return3		4.67%		2.50%		(3.18)%		9.52%		14.96%
Partners’ capital, end of year (000s)	$	2,064,041	$	3,071,734	$	4,301,279	$	5,355,785	$	5,212,611

An investor’s return (and operating ratios) may vary from those reflected based on the timing of capital transactions.

1 Ratios are calculated by dividing the indicated amount by average partners’ capital measured at the end of each month during the year.

2 Expense ratios do not include expenses of acquired funds that are paid indirectly by the Master Fund as a result of its ownership in the underlying funds. Expenses include U.S. offshore withholding tax, which is only allocable to investors investing through the offshore feeder funds.

3 Calculated as geometrically linked monthly returns for each month in the year.

(12) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 18, 2014, the Board approved a tender offer (the “Offer”) to be made for up to 100% of the Master Fund’s outstanding Interests with a valuation date of March 31, 2014, with a potential extension of the valuation date to June 30, 2014 depending on certain factors as set forth in the Offer. Unlike the Master Fund’s prior offers to repurchase Interests, with respect to which the Master Fund paid repurchase proceeds in cash, proceeds for Interests tendered and accepted pursuant to the Offer will not be paid in cash. Proceeds for tendered Interests will be paid in-kind with tendering partners receiving 100% of their repurchase proceeds in shares of limited partnership interests (the “Shares”) in PMF Fund, L.P. (the “PMF Fund”), a newly-formed, closed-end, non-diversified, investment company registered under the 1940 Act that invests substantially all of its assets in The Endowment PMF Master Fund, L.P. (the “PMF Master Fund” and together with the PMF Fund, the “PMF Funds”), which also is a newly-formed, closed-end, non-diversified, registered investment company under the 1940 Act.

The Offer commenced on February 20, 2014 and, unless extended, will expire on March 19, 2014. The estimated net asset value will be calculated for the purpose of the Offer as of March 31, 2014 or, if the valuation date is extended, June 30, 2014. The Offer is subject to certain conditions and is being made simultaneously with a cash tender offer by the PMF Fund in which partners tendering Interests pursuant to the Offer, and therefore becoming holders of Shares of the PMF Fund, will have the opportunity to participate (the “PMF Funds Offer”). The PMF Funds Offer is a cash repurchase offer pursuant to which Shares will be repurchased at a discount to

62

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Notes to Financial Statements, continued

December 31, 2013

their net asset value, assuming all of the conditions of the PMF Funds Offer are satisfied. The Offer is not contingent upon the completion of the PMF Funds Offer. Additional information regarding the Offer and the PMF Funds Offer is available free of charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Subsequent to locking the net asset value of the portfolio on January 23, 2014, certain underlying investment fund managers provided updated valuation information. Due to the impact of such information on the Master Fund’s net asset value, management made the decision to adjust the estimated fair value of such investment funds to reflect such updated information in the accompanying financial statements, which resulted in an increase to the value of the Master Fund’s net asset value in the amount of $42,725,467.

63

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Directors and Officers

The Master Fund’s operations are managed under the direction and oversight of the Board. Each Director serves for an indefinite term or until he or she reaches mandatory retirement, if any, as established by the Board. The Board appoints the officers of the Master Fund who are responsible for the Master Fund’s day-to-day business decisions based on policies set by the Board. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Compensation for Directors

The Master Fund, The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P, The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P. and The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P., together pay each of the Directors who is not an “interested person” of the Adviser, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Directors”) an annual retainer of $38,000, paid quarterly, an annual Board meeting fee of $15,000, a fee of $1,250 per informal Board meeting, a fee of $1,250 per telephonic Board meeting, an annual fee of $4,000 for membership on each committee, an annual fee of $5,000 for the audit committee chairman and $2,500 for each other committee chair, each of which is paid quarterly, and an annual fee of $7,500, paid quarterly, to the Lead Independent Director. There are currently six Independent Directors. In the interest of retaining Independent Directors of the highest quality, the Board intends to periodically review such compensation and may modify it as the Board deems appropriate.

Interested Directors

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
John A. Blaisdell(1) Age: 53 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director, Co- Principal Executive Officer (Since 2004)	Member, Investment Committee of the Adviser, since 2002; Managing Director of Salient, since 2002.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.

64

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and  Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Andrew Linbeck(1) Age: 49 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director, Co- Principal Executive Officer (Since 2004)	Member, Investment Committee of the Adviser, since 2002; Managing Director of Salient, since 2002.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) 2010-2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.
A. Haag Sherman(1) Age: 48 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	Member, Investment Committee of the Adviser, 2002-2011; Managing Director of Salient, 2002-2011.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) 2010-2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; Plains Capital Corporation, since 2009; Blue Dolphin Energy Company, since 2012.

⁽¹⁾  This person’s status as an “interested” director arises from his affiliation with Salient Partners, L.P., which itself is an affiliate of the Master Fund, The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P., The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P., and the Adviser.

65

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Independent Directors

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Karin B. Bonding, CFA Age: 74 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2010)	Lecturer, University of Virginia, since 1996; President of Capital Markets Institute, Inc. (fee-only financial planner and investment advisor) since 1996.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; Brandes Investment Trust (investment companies)(four funds) since 2006; Credit Suisse Alternative Capital Funds (investment companies) (six funds) 2005-2010.
Jonathan P. Carroll Age: 52 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	President of Lazarus Financial LLC (holding company) since 2006; private investor for the past six years.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.

66

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Dr. Bernard Harris Age: 57 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2009)	Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner, Vesalius Ventures, Inc (venture investing), since 2002; President of The Space Agency (marketing), since 1999; President of The Harris Foundation (non-profit), since 1998; clinical scientist, flight surgeon and astronaut for NASA, 1986 to 1996.	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; U.S. Physical Therapy, Inc., since 2005; Sterling Bancshares, Inc., since 2007; RMD Networks, Inc., since 2006; Monebo Technologies Inc., since 2009; AG Technologies, since 2009; The Harris Foundation, Inc., since 1998; Houston Technology Center, since 2004; Greater Houston Community Foundation, 2004-2009; Communities in Schools, since 2007; ZOO SCORE “Counselors to America’s Small Business”, since 2009; American Telemedicine Association, since 2007; Houston Angel Network, since 2004; BioHouston, since 2006; The National Math and Science Initiative, and Space Agency, since 2008.

67

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Richard C. Johnson Age: 76 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	Senior Counsel (retired) for Baker Botts LLP (law firm) since 2002; Managing Partner, Baker Botts, 1998 to 2002; practiced law at Baker Botts, 1966 to 2002 (1972 to 2002 as a partner).	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011.
G. Edward Powell Age: 77 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	Principal of Mills & Stowell (private equity) since 2002. Principal, Innovation Growth Partners (consulting), since 2002; Consultant to emerging and middle market businesses, 1994-2002; Managing Partner, PriceWaterhouse & Co. (Houston Office, 1982 to 1994).	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; Therapy Track, LLC, since 2009; Global Water Technologies, Inc.; Datavox Holdings, Inc.; Energy Services International, Inc., since 2004.

68

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director	Other Directorships Held by Director
Scott E. Schwinger Age: 48 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Director (Since 2004)	President, The McNair Group (management), since 2006; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the Houston Texans (professional football team) (1999).	5	Salient Alternative Strategies Funds (investment companies) (two funds) since 2010; Salient MF Trust (investment company) (five funds) since 2012; Salient Midstream & MLP Fund (investment company) since 2012; Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund (investment company) since 2011; The Make-A-Wish Foundation, since 2008; YES Prep Public Schools, since 2001.

Officers of the Fund Who Are Not Directors

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with the Fund	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years
Paul Bachtold Age: 40 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) (Since 2010)	CCO, Salient, since 2010; Consultant, Chicago Investment Group (compliance consulting), 2009-2010; US Compliance Manager, Barclays Global Investors, 2005-2008.
John E. Price Age: 46 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Treasurer; Principal Financial Officer (Since 2004)	Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer, Adviser, since 2003; Partner, Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Salient, since 2003.
Jeremy Radcliffe Age: 39 Address: c/o The Endowment Fund 4265 San Felipe, 8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027	Secretary (Since 2013)	Managing Director of Salient, since 2002.

69

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Supplemental Information, continued

December 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

Allocation of Investments

The following chart indicates the allocation of investments among the asset classes in the Master Fund as of December 31, 2013.

Asset Class1	Fair Value		%
Arbitrage Strategies	$	259,380,056		12.40
Domestic Equity		27,794,430		1.33
Energy		236,553,251		11.31
Enhanced Fixed Income		145,106,419		6.94
Global Opportunistic		212,121,331		10.14
International Equity		43,287,010		2.07
Natural Resources		34,182,182		1.63
Private Equity		727,754,609		34.77
Real Estate		195,817,823		9.36
Technology		129,024		0.01
Call Options Purchased		20,750,470		0.99
Money Market Funds		189,272,108		9.05
Total Investments	$	2,092,148,713		100.00

1 The complete list of investments included in the following asset class categories is included in the Schedule of Investments of the Master Fund.

Form N-Q Filings

The Master Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Master Fund’s Form N-Q is available on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov. The Master Fund’s Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Securities and Exchange Commission Public Reference Room in Washington, DC and information regarding operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

Proxy Voting Policies

A description of the policies and procedures that the Master Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-725-9456; and (ii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov.

Information regarding how the Master Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-725-9456; and (ii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at http://www.sec.gov.

Additional Information

The Master Fund’s private placement memorandum (the “PPM”) includes additional information about Directors of the Master Fund. The PPM is available, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-725-9456.

70

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(A Limited Partnership)

Privacy Policy (Unaudited)

The Master Fund recognizes the importance of securing personal financial information. It is our policy to safeguard any personal and financial information that may be entrusted to us. The following is a description of the Master Fund’s policy regarding disclosure of nonpublic personal information.

We collect nonpublic personal information as follows:

We collect information about our investors, including, but not limited to, the investor’s name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, social security number and date of birth. We collect that information from subscription agreements, other forms of correspondence that we receive from investors, from personal conversations and from affiliated entities as permitted by law.

We receive information about investor transactions with us, including, but not limited to, account number, account balance, investment amounts, withdrawal amounts and other financial information.

We are permitted by law to disclose nonpublic information we collect, as described above, to the Master Fund’s service providers, including the Master Fund’s investment adviser, sub-advisers, servicing agent, independent administrator, custodian, legal counsel, accountant and auditor. We do not disclose any nonpublic information about our current or former investors to nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We restrict access to investor nonpublic personal information to those persons who require such information to provide products or services to investors. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to guard investors’ nonpublic personal information.

If an investor’s investment relationship with the Master Fund involves a financial intermediary, including, but not limited to, a broker-dealer, bank or trust company, the privacy policy of such investor’s financial intermediary would govern how any nonpublic personal information would be shared by them with nonaffiliated third parties.

71

Independent Directors

Jonathan P. Carroll

Dr. Bernard Harris

Richard C. Johnson

G. Edward Powell

Scott E. Schwinger

Karin B. Bonding

Interested Directors and Officers

A. Haag Sherman, Director

John A. Blaisdell, Director and Co-Principal Executive Officer

Andrew B. Linbeck, Director and Co-Principal Executive Officer

John E. Price, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer

Jeremy Radcliffe, Secretary

Paul A. Bachtold, Chief Compliance Officer

Investment Adviser

Endowment Advisers, L.P.

Houston, TX

Fund Administrator and Transfer Agent

Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc.

Columbus, OH

Custodian

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Greenwich, CT

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

KPMG LLP

Columbus, OH

Legal Counsel

K&L Gates LLP

Boston, MA

THE ENDOWMENT FUND®
4265 San Felipe
8th Floor
Houston, Texas 77027
Tel 800-725-9456
Fax 713-993-4698

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

(a) The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. This code of ethics is included as Exhibit 12(a)(1).

(b) During the period covered by the report, with respect to the registrant’s code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions; there have been no amendments to, nor any waivers granted from, a provision that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item 2.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

3(a)(1) The registrant’s board of directors has determined that the registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee.

3(a)(2) The audit committee financial expert is G. Edward Powell, who is “independent” for purposes of this Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

	Current Year		Previous Year
Audit Fees	$	10,400	$	10,250
Audit-Related Fees	$	0	$	0
Tax Fees	$	0	$	0
All Other Fees	$	0	$	0

(e)(1) Disclose the audit committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

The audit committee may delegate its authority to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services to one or more members of the committee. Any decision of such members to pre-approve services shall be presented to the full audit committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

(2) Disclose the percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c) (7)(i)(c) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

Current Year	Previous Year
0%	0%

(f) Not applicable.

(g) Disclose the aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrant’s accountant for services rendered to registrant, and rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant.

Current Year	Previous Year
$0	$ 0

(h) Not applicable.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Investments.

(a) Schedule of Investments as of the close of the reporting period is included in the report to the shareholders filed under item 1 of this form.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

A closed-end management investment company that is filing an annual report on this Form N-CSR must, unless it invests exclusively in non-voting securities, describe the policies and procedures that it uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, including the procedures that the company uses when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of its shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the company’s investment adviser; principal underwriter; or any affiliated person (as defined in section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3)) and the rules thereunder) of the company, its investment adviser, or its principal underwriter, on the other. Include any policies and procedures of the company’s investment adviser, or any other third party, that the company uses, or that are used on the company’s behalf, to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities.

These policies are included as Exhibit 12(a)(4).

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

The Adviser’s Investment Committee Members

As of the date of the filing, the Investment Committee is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio. The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. (the “Master Fund”), The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P. (the “Institutional Fund”), The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P. (the “Registered Fund”), The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P. (the “TEI Fund”) and The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “Institutional TEI W Fund”) are registered investment companies (collectively, the “Fund Complex” and each individually the “Fund”). The members of the Investment Committee (each an “Investment Committee Member”) are: Messrs. Lee G. Partridge, Jeremy L. Radcliffe, William K. Enszer, William B. Hunt and William R. Guinn.

Mr. Partridge has served as an Investment Committee Member since January 15, 2013, and has served as Chief Investment Officer of Salient Partners, L.P. (“Salient”), which owns Salient Trust Co., LTA, a trust company chartered under the laws of the State of Texas, since January 15, 2013. Mr. Radcliffe has served as an Investment Committee Member since 2014 and Managing Director of Salient since 2002. Previously, he held the position of Partner of The Redstone Companies, L.P. and certain affiliates thereof (from 1998-2002 (collectively, “Redstone”)). Mr. Enszer has served as an Investment Committee Member since 2014 and Director of Salient since 2010. Previously, he held the position of Vice President of Redstone Asset Management (from 2005-2010). Mr. Hunt has served as an Investment Committee Member since 2014 and as Chief Risk Officer of Salient since 2014. He previously held positions as a Senior Analyst and Portfolio Manager of Iridian Asset Management (from 1996-2011) and Professor at Southern Methodist University (from 1991-2000). Mr. Guinn has served as an Investment Committee Member since 2014 and Director of Salient since 2013. Previously, he held the position of Director of Strategic Partnerships and Opportunistic Investments at the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (2009-2013). Each member of the Investment Committee reviews asset allocation recommendations made by the Adviser’s representatives, manager due diligence and recommendations and, by a majority vote of the Investment Committee, determines asset allocation and manager selection.

The Adviser and certain other entities controlled by the Principals manage investment programs which are similar to that of the Fund, and the Adviser and/or the Principals may in the future serve as an investment adviser or otherwise manage or direct the investment activities of other registered and/or private investment vehicles with investment programs similar to the Funds.

Other Accounts Managed by the Investment Adviser

Certain Investment Committee Members, who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, also manage other registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles and other accounts, as indicated below. The following tables identify, as of December 31, 2013: (i) the number of registered investment companies (including the Fund), other pooled investment vehicles and other accounts managed by the Investment Committee Member and the total assets of such companies, vehicles and accounts; and (ii) the number and total assets of such companies, vehicles and accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on performance.

Name	Number of Other Accounts		Total Assets of Other Accounts		Number of Other Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee		Total Assets of Other Accounts Subject to a Performance Fee
Jeremy Radcliffe
Registered investment companies (1)		9	$	1.51 billion		0	$	—
Other pooled investment companies (1)		13	$	1.29 billion		2	$	331 million
Other accounts		>1420	$	14.31 billion		3	$	9.80 billion
Lee Partridge
Registered investment companies (1)		9	$	1.43 billion		0	$	—
Other pooled investment companies (1)		11	$	1.05 billion		2	$	331 million
Other accounts		>1420	$	14.27 billion		3	$	9.80 billion
William K. Enszer
Registered investment companies (1)		0	$	—		0	$	—
Other pooled investment companies (1)		0	$	—		0	$	—
Other accounts		0	$	—		0	$	—
William B. Hunt
Registered investment companies (1)		0	$	—		0	$	—
Other pooled investment companies (1)		0	$	—		0	$	—
Other accounts		0	$	—		0	$	—
William R. Guinn
Registered investment companies (1)		3	$	1.18 billion		0	$	—
Other pooled investment companies (1)		3	$	425 million		2	$	331 million
Other accounts		>1420	$	4.57 billion		2	$	70 million

(1) For registered investment companies and pooled investment vehicles managed, the number of vehicles reported for master-feeder structures includes both the master fund and feeder funds while the corresponding total assets reported reflect the assets of the master fund only.

Conflicts of Interest of the Adviser

From time to time, potential conflicts of interest may arise between an Investment Committee Member’s management of the investments of the Fund, on the one hand, and the management of other registered investment companies, pooled investment vehicles and other accounts (collectively, “other accounts”), on the other. The other accounts might have similar investment objectives or strategies as the Fund, track the same index the Fund tracks or otherwise hold, purchase, or sell securities that are eligible to be held, purchased or sold by the Fund. The other accounts might also have different investment objectives or strategies than the Fund.

Knowledge and Timing of Fund Trades. A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the Investment Committee Member’s day-to-day management of a Fund. Because of their positions with the Fund, the Investment Committee Members know the size, timing and possible market impact of the Fund’s trades. It is theoretically possible that the Investment Committee Members could use this information to the advantage of other accounts they manage and to the possible detriment of the Fund.

Investment Opportunities. A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the Investment Committee Member’s management of a number of accounts with varying investment guidelines. Often, an investment opportunity may be suitable for both the Fund and other accounts managed by the Investment Committee Member, but may not be available in sufficient quantities for both the Fund and the other accounts to participate fully. Similarly, there may be limited opportunity to sell an investment held by the Fund and other accounts. The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to allocate investment opportunities on a fair and equitable basis over time.

Performance Fees. An Investment Committee Member may advise certain accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based entirely or partially on performance. Performance fee arrangements may create a conflict of interest for the Investment Committee Member in that the Member may have an incentive to allocate the investment opportunities that he or she believes might be the most profitable to such other accounts instead of allocating them to the Fund.

Compensation to Investment Committee Members

Messrs. Partridge, Radcliffe, Enszer, Hunt and Guinn indirectly own equity interests in the Adviser. As it relates to the Fund and other funds within the Fund Complex, Messrs. Partridge, Radcliffe, Enszer, Hunt and Guinn receive all of their compensation based on the size of the Fund and the other funds within the Fund Complex and the management and servicing fees charged thereon. Accordingly, they believe that a significant driver of their compensation is the performance of the Fund and the Fund Complex, which has a significant bearing on the ability to raise additional assets. Messrs. Partridge, Radcliffe, Enszer, Hunt and Guinn also indirectly own equity in the advisers to other funds and are compensated based on the size of the funds’ asset bases and the management and servicing fees charged thereon. In addition, Messrs. Partridge and Radcliffe are partners and principal executive officers of Salient and related affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Salient Group”), which pays them a base salary (but no bonus) and is obligated to make distributions of profits to them, as well as the other partners, on an annual basis. These individuals are responsible for the investment processes and management of the Salient Group. Messrs. Partridge and Radcliffe believe that to the extent that they are successful in their investment endeavors, the greater the number of assets over time and the more significant their compensation from the Salient Group.

Securities Ownership of Investment Committee Members

The table below shows the dollar range of the interests of each Fund beneficially owned as of December 31, 2013 by each Investment Committee Member.

Investment Committee Member	Master Fund	Registered Fund	Institutional Fund	TEI Fund	Institutional TEI W Fund
Jeremy L. Radcliffe	None	None	$500,001 to $750,000	None	None
Lee G. Partridge	None	None	None	None	None
William K. Enszer	None	None	None	None	None
William B. Hunt	None	None	None	None	None
William R. Guinn	None	None	None	None	None

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that these disclosure controls and procedures are adequately designed and are operating effectively to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant on Form N-CSR is (i) accumulated and communicated to the investment company’s management, including its certifying officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure; and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) Code of ethics that is subject to Item 2 is attached hereto.

(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) are attached hereto.

(a)(3) Not applicable.

(a)(4) Proxy voting policies and procedures pursuant to Item 7 are attached hereto.

(b) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) are furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant) The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.
By (Signature and Title)	/s/ John A. Blaisdell
	John A. Blaisdell
	Co-Principal Executive Officer

  Date:       February 27, 2014

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ Andrew B. Linbeck
	Andrew B. Linbeck
	Co-Principal Executive Officer

Date:     February 27, 2014

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ John A. Blaisdell
	John A. Blaisdell
	Co-Principal Executive Officer

Date:     February 27, 2014

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ Andrew B. Linbeck
	Andrew B. Linbeck
	Co-Principal Executive Officer

Date:     February 27, 2014

By (Signature and Title)	/s/ John E. Price
	John E. Price
	Principal Financial Officer

Date:     February 27, 2014

EX-99.CODE

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P.

The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P.

Code of Ethics (Rule 17j-1)

I. General

A. Statement of Purpose

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P., The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P., and the Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P. (each, a “Fund,” and, together, the “Funds”); and Salient Capital, L.P., the placement agent for each Fund (the “Placement Agent”) (the Funds and the Placement Agent are each a “Company” and together the “Companies”) each hold their directors, general partners, officers, employees and service providers to a high standard of integrity and business practices. The Companies strive to avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest in connection with transactions in securities for the Funds.

The Companies recognize that the knowledge of present or future portfolio transactions and, in certain instances, the power to influence portfolio transactions in securities that may be possessed by certain of their directors, general partners, officers and employees could place such individuals, if they engage in personal transactions in securities that are eligible for investment by a Fund, in a position where their personal interests may conflict with the interests of the Fund.

In view of the foregoing and of the provisions of Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”),¹ each Company has determined to adopt this Code of Ethics (“Code”) to identify and prohibit certain types of transactions deemed to create conflicts of interest (or at least the potential for or the appearance of such a conflict) and to establish reporting requirements and enforcement procedures. This document constitutes the Code required by Rule 17j-1 for the Companies.

B. Statement of General Principles

The following general principles should guide the actions of Access Persons (as defined below) in evaluating and engaging in personal securities transactions:

¹  Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act makes it unlawful for investment company personnel and other “Access Persons” to engage in “fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative” practices in connection with their personal transactions in securities when those securities are held or to be acquired by an investment company. The Rule also requires every investment company, the investment company’s investment adviser, and, in certain cases, the investment company’s placement agent to adopt a Code of Ethics containing provisions “reasonably necessary to prevent” such prohibited practices.

1. The interests of the Funds’ shareholders are paramount. Access Persons must conduct themselves and their operations to give maximum effect to this tenet by assiduously placing the interests of the shareholders before their own.

2. All personal transactions in securities by Access Persons must be accomplished so as to avoid even the appearance of a conflict with the interests of the Funds and their shareholders.

3. Access Persons must avoid actions or activities that allow (or appear to allow) a person to profit or benefit from his or her position with respect to the Funds, or that otherwise bring into question the person’s independence or judgment.

This Code does not attempt to identify all possible conflicts of interest, and literal compliance with each of the specific procedures will not shield a person from liability for personal trading or other conduct that violates any fiduciary duty to a Fund’s shareholders. In addition to the specific prohibitions contained in this Code, each person covered by this Code is subject to a general requirement not to engage in any act or practice that would defraud a Fund’s shareholders.

C. Applicability of Code

The requirements of this Code are not applicable to any Access Person of a Fund who is subject to a separate code of ethics adopted by the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser of the Fund, provided that: (1) such Code of Ethics complies with the requirements of Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act and has been approved by the Fund’s Board; and (2) such Adviser or Sub-Adviser has certified to the Board of the Fund that it has adopted procedures reasonably necessary to prevent Access Persons from violating such code of ethics.

II. Definitions

For purposes of this Code, the following terms have the meanings set forth as follows:

A. “Access Person” means:

1. any director, officer or general partner of a Fund, and any Advisory Person of a Fund’s investment adviser (“Adviser”) or any sub-adviser (“Sub-Adviser”);² and

2. any director, officer or general partner of the Placement Agent who, in the ordinary course of business, makes, participates in or obtains information

²  If the Adviser or Sub-Adviser’s primary business is advising funds or advisory clients, all of the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s directors, officers, and general partners are presumed to be Access Persons of the Fund. If the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser is primarily engaged in a business other than advising funds or advisory clients, “Access Person” means any director, officer, general partner or Advisory Person of the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser who, with respect to the Fund for which such entity acts as Adviser or Sub-Adviser, makes any recommendation, participates in determining which recommendations shall be made, or whose principal function or duties relate to determining which recommendations shall be made or who, in connection with his or her duties, obtains any information concerning securities recommendations being made by such Adviser or Sub-Adviser.

regarding a Purchase or Sale of Covered Securities for the Funds or whose functions or duties as part of the ordinary course of business relate to the making of any recommendation to the Funds regarding any Purchase or Sale of Covered Securities.

B. “Advisory Person” means:

1. any director, officer, general partner or employee of the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser (or of any company in a Control relationship to a Fund, the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser) who, in connection with his or her regular functions or duties, makes, participates in, or obtains information regarding the Purchase or Sale of a Covered Security by the Fund or whose functions relate to the making of any recommendations with respect to such Purchases or Sales; and

2. any natural person in a Control relationship to a Fund, Adviser or Sub-Adviser who obtains information concerning recommendations made to the Fund with regard to the Purchase or Sale of a Covered Security by the Fund.

C. “Affiliated Person” of another person shall mean:

1. any person directly or indirectly owning, controlling, or holding with power to vote, 5 per centum or more of the outstanding voting securities of such other person;

2. any person 5 per centum or more of whose outstanding voting securities are directly or indirectly owned, controlled, or held with power to vote, by such other person;

3. any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, such other person;

4. any officer, director, partner, copartner, or employee of such other person; and

5. with respect to a Fund, the Adviser and any Sub-Adviser.

D. “Automatic Investment Plan” means a program in which regular periodic purchases (or withdrawals) are made automatically in (or from) investment accounts in accordance with a predetermined schedule and allocation. An Automatic Investment Plan includes a dividend reinvestment plan.

E. “Board” means a Fund’s Board of Directors.

F. “Beneficial Ownership” is to be determined in the same manner as it is determined for purposes of Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This means that a person should generally consider himself or herself the beneficial owner of any securities of which he or she shares in the profits, even if he or she has no influence on voting or disposition of the securities; but does not include securities held by limited partnerships where the person is not aware of such security holding and has no control or discretion as to its disposition.

G. “Control” shall have the same meaning as that set forth in Section 2(a)(9) of the 1940 Act. Section 2(a)(9) defines “control” as the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company, unless such power is solely the result of an official position with such company. Ownership of more than 25% of a company’s outstanding voting securities is presumed to give the holder thereof control over the company.

H. “Covered Security” has the same meaning as that set forth in Rule 17j-1(a)(4), which defines the term very broadly, but excludes direct obligations of the U.S. government, bankers’ acceptances, bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper, high quality short-term debt instruments (including repurchase agreements), and shares issued by a registered open-end investment company.

I. “Disinterested Director” means a director of a Fund who is not an “interested person” of the Fund within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.

J. “Initial Public Offering” means an offering of securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the issuer of which, immediately before the registration, was not subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

K. “Investment Fund” has the same meaning as set forth in a Fund’s private placement memorandum.

L. “Investment Personnel” means:

1. Any employee of a Fund, the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser (or of any company in a Control relationship to the Fund, the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser) who, in connection with his or her regular functions or duties, makes or participates in making recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of securities by the Fund.

2. Any natural person who controls a Fund, the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser and who obtains information concerning recommendations made to the Fund regarding the purchase or sale of securities by the Fund.

M. “Limited Offering” means an offering that is exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to section 4(2) or 4(6) or pursuant to rule 504, rule 505, or rule 506 under the Securities Act.

N. “Purchase or Sale of a Covered Security” means obtaining or disposing of Beneficial Ownership of that Covered Security and includes, among other things, the writing of an option to purchase or sell a Covered Security.

P. “Review Officer” shall mean the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), or any other person charged with the responsibility, at any given time, to pre-clear trades, grant exceptions to prohibitions under the Code, receive reports and notices required by this Code to be generated, and to accomplish any other requirement of this Code.

1. A person may be designated by a Board or the CCO as a Review Officer of a Fund (or the CCO may undertake the responsibility of serving as the Review Officer) for purposes of this Code without otherwise formally carrying that title or the responsibility for functions otherwise generally associated with the responsibilities of a compliance officer.

2. The Review Officer may delegate certain functions as appropriate.

Q. “Security held or to be Acquired by a Fund” shall mean

1. Any Covered Security which, within the most recent 15 days:

(a) Is or has been directly held by the Fund; or

(b) Is being or has been considered by the Fund or the Adviser for purchase by the Fund; and

2. Any option to purchase or sell, and any security convertible into or exchangeable for, a Covered Security.

3. Specifically excluded from this definition are any Covered Securities in which the Fund has no investment discretion and that the Fund has no current knowledge are being held on its behalf (i.e., an investment by the Fund in an Investment Fund) for which the manager of the Investment Fund has full discretion to buy or sell securities without consultation or input from the Fund).

The CCO of the Funds may provide the Boards with a list of each Security held or to be Acquired by a Fund on not less than a quarterly basis. The Boards, Access Persons and Advisory Persons are entitled to rely on this list in conducting their personal affairs in compliance with the Code. In the event that any such person breaches the Code due to a misstatement or omission with respect to such list, such person shall not be deemed responsible for such breach, unless he or she had actual knowledge that his or her actions would result in a breach (i.e., knew that the security transaction being conducted by such person was a breach of the Code).

III. Approval, Adoption and Administration of Code of Ethics

A. Each Company must:

1. adopt a written Code containing provisions reasonably necessary to prevent Access Persons from violating the Code;

2. provide the written Code and any amendments thereto to the Boards; and

3. provide a written certification to the Boards that it has adopted procedures reasonably necessary to prevent Access Persons from violating the Code.

B. The Boards, including a majority of the Disinterested Directors, must approve this Code, as well as the applicable code of ethics of the Adviser and any Sub-Adviser to a Fund. The Boards must base their approval on a determination that the relevant Code contains provisions reasonably necessary to prevent Access Persons from violating the Code.

C. Following initial approval of this Code and the code of ethics of the Adviser or any Sub-Adviser to a Fund, any material change to a Code must be approved by the Board of the Fund, including a majority of the Disinterested Directors thereof, within six months of such amendment.

D. No less frequently than annually, each Fund, the Adviser, each Sub-Adviser and the Placement Agent must furnish to the Boards, and the Boards must consider, a written report that:

1. Describes any issues arising under the Code or a code of ethics applicable to the Adviser or Sub-Adviser since the last report to the Boards, including, but not limited to, information about material violations of the code or procedures and sanctions imposed in response to the material violations, summarizes any changes in the procedures made during the past year, and identifies any recommended changes in existing restrictions or procedures based upon the Funds’, the Adviser’s, the Sub-Adviser’s and the Placement Agent’s experience, evolving industry practice, or developments in applicable laws and regulations; and

2. Certifies that the Fund, the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser and the Placement Agent, as applicable, has adopted procedures reasonably necessary to prevent Access Persons from violating the Code or a code of ethics applicable to the Adviser or Sub-Adviser (as applicable).

IV. Legal Requirements

A. General Prohibitions

It is the policy of the Companies that no Access Person, any Affiliated Person of a Fund, or any Affiliated Person of the Adviser or the Placement Agent, shall engage in any act, practice or course of conduct that would violate the provisions of Rule 17j-1.

Rule 17j-1(b) under the 1940 Act provides that the Placement Agent, any Affiliated Person of a Fund, and any Affiliated Person of the Adviser or the Placement Agent, in connection with the purchase or sale, directly or indirectly, by such person of a Security Held or to be Acquired by the Fund shall not:

1. employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud a Fund;

2. make to the Fund any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state to the Fund a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;

3. engage in any act, practice or course of business that would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the Fund; or

4. engage in any manipulative practice with respect to the Fund.

B. Reporting Obligations

Each Access Person shall file the following reports with the Review Officer. Please note that special provisions apply to Disinterested Directors, as detailed in paragraph B.5 below.

1. Initial Holdings Report. No later than ten (10) days after the person becomes an Access Person under this Code, each Access Person (other than a Fund’s Disinterested Directors) must provide to the Review Officer an initial holdings report, which is current as of a date no more than 45 days prior to the date the reporting person becomes an Access Person, containing the following information:

a. The title, number of shares and principal amount of each Covered Security in which the Access Person had any direct or indirect beneficial ownership when the person became an Access Person;

b. The name of any broker, dealer or bank with whom the Access Person maintained an account in which any securities were held for the direct or indirect benefit of the Access Person as of the date the person became an Access Person; and

c. The date that the report is submitted by the Access Person.

2. Quarterly Reports. Each Access Person (subject to paragraph B.5 with respect to a Fund’s Disinterested Directors) must provide to the Review Officer, on a quarterly basis, not later than thirty (30) days after the end of the calendar quarter, a report containing the following information:

a. With respect to any transaction during the quarter in a Covered Security in which the Access Person had any direct or indirect beneficial ownership:

i. The date of the transaction, the title, the interest rate and maturity date (if applicable) and the number of shares and the principal amount of each Covered Security involved;

ii. The nature of the transaction (i.e., purchase, sale or any other type of acquisition or disposition);

iii. The price at which the transaction was effected;

iv. The name of the broker, dealer or bank with or through whom the transaction was effected; and

v. The date the report was submitted by the Access Person.

b. With respect to any account established by the Access Person in which any securities were held during the quarter for the direct or indirect benefit of the Access Person:

i. The name of the broker, dealer or bank with whom the Access Person established the account;

ii. The date the account was established; and

iii. The date that the report is submitted by the Access Person.

3. Annual Holdings Report. Each Access Person (other than a Fund’s Disinterested Directors) must annually provide to the Review Officer a complete listing of all Covered Securities owned by the Access Person, no later than February 14 of each year, which report must be current as of a date no more than 45 days before the report is submitted. The listing must contain the following information:

a. The title, number of shares and principal amount of each Covered Security in which the Access Person had any direct or indirect beneficial ownership;

b. The name of any broker, dealer or bank with whom the Access Person maintains an account in which any securities are held for the direct or indirect benefit of the Access Person; and

c. The date that the report is submitted by the Access Person.

4. Annual Certification. All Access Persons shall be required to certify annually that they have received, read and understand the Code. Further, all Access Persons are required to certify annually that they have complied with the requirements of the Code and that they have disclosed or reported all personal securities transactions required to be disclosed or reported pursuant to the Code.

5. Disinterested Directors. A Disinterested Director is required to complete a quarterly report only if (i) the Disinterested Director knew, or in the ordinary course of fulfilling his or her official duties as a Fund director should have known, that during the 15-day period immediately before or after his or her transaction, such Covered Security was Purchased or Sold, or considered for Purchase or Sale, by the Fund;³ or (ii) during the relevant quarter, the Disinterested Director has engaged in what he or she believes may be construed as short-term trading in the securities of a registered open-end investment company that is advised by the Adviser or an affiliate of the Adviser. The “should have known” standard implies no duty of inquiry, does not presume there should have been any deduction or extrapolation from discussions or memoranda dealing with tactics to be employed in meeting any of a Fund’s investment objectives, or that any knowledge is to be imputed because of prior knowledge of the Funds’ portfolio holdings, market considerations, or the Funds’ investment policies and objectives or investment restrictions.

C. Exceptions from Reporting Requirements

An Access Person need not submit:

1. Any report with respect to Covered Securities held in accounts over which the Access Person had no direct or indirect influence or control;

2. A quarterly report if the report would duplicate information contained in broker trade confirmations or account statements received by the Funds, the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser or the Placement Agent no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter and/or information contained in the Adviser’s, Sub-Adviser’s, Placement Agent’s and/or the Funds’ records.

³  This reporting requirement shall not be applicable to securities traded by passively managed index funds.

3. Reports otherwise required by this Section, if the Access Person is also an Access Person of the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser to the Funds, provided that either:

a. such person submits to the Adviser or Sub-Adviser forms prescribed by the code of ethics of such Adviser or Sub-Adviser containing substantially the same information as called for in the forms required by this Section; or

b. the information is such report would duplicate information required to be recorded under Rule 204-2(a)(13) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

4. A quarterly report with respect to transactions effected pursuant to an Automatic Investment Plan.

V. Pre-Clearance of Securities Transactions

Investment Personnel must obtain approval from the CCO or the Review Officer before directly or indirectly acquiring Beneficial Ownership of any Covered Security as part of an Initial Public Offering or Limited Offering. Investment Personnel who are subject to the code of ethics of the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser need not submit to this procedure provided that such person is subject to a similar procedure under such other code of ethics.

VI. Confidentiality

All reports of securities transactions and any other information filed with a Fund pursuant to this Code shall be treated as confidential. Any such report may contain a statement that the report shall not be construed as an admission by the person making such report that he or she has any direct or indirect beneficial ownership in the security to which the report relates.

No Access Person shall reveal to any other person (except in the normal course of his or her duties on behalf of a Fund) any information regarding securities transactions made or being considered by or on behalf of the Funds.

VII. Review and Enforcement

A. The Review Officer for each Fund, in consultation with other Review Officers, shall compare all reported personal securities transactions with completed portfolio transactions of each Fund and a list of securities being considered for purchase or sale by each Fund to determine whether a violation of this Code may have occurred. One test that may be applied in determining whether a violation of the Code has occurred will be to review the securities transactions of Access Persons for patterns of transactions. For example:

1. Any pattern involving parallel transactions (for the Fund and the individual both buying or both selling the same Covered Security) or opposite transactions (buy/sell or sell/buy) may be analyzed to determine whether the individual’s transaction may have violated the Code.

2. Among the other factors that may be considered in the analysis are:

a. the number and dollar amount of the transactions;

b. the trading volume of the Covered Security in question;

c. the length of time the Covered Security has been held by the individual; and

d. the individual’s involvement in the investment process.

It should be noted, however, that a violation could be deemed to have resulted from a single transaction if the circumstances warrant a finding that the underlying principles of fair dealing have been violated. Before making any determination that a violation has been committed by any person, the Review Officer shall give such person an opportunity to supply additional explanatory material.

B. If the Review Officer determines that a violation of this Code may have occurred, the Review Officer shall submit his or her written determination, together with a confidential report and any additional explanatory material provided by the individual, to the CCO (if different from the Review Officer) or the CCO’s delegate and outside counsel to the Funds, who shall make an independent determination as to whether a violation has occurred.

C. If the CCO (or delegate) and outside counsel to the Funds find that a violation has occurred, the CCO, in consultation with the Fund’s President, shall impose upon the individual such sanctions as he or she deems appropriate and shall report the violation and the sanction imposed to the Funds’ Boards.

D. No person shall participate in a determination of (1) whether he or she personally has committed a violation of the Code, or (2) the imposition of any sanction in the event he or she committed a violation of the Code. If a Covered Securities transaction of the CCO is under consideration, the President of the Funds shall act in all respects in the manner prescribed in this Code for the CCO.

VIII. Records

Each Fund shall maintain records in the manner and to the extent set forth below, which may be maintained on microfilm or by such other means permissible under the conditions described in Rule 31a-2 under the 1940 Act or under no-action letters or interpretations under that rule, and shall be available for examination by representatives of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

A. A copy of this Code shall be preserved in an easily accessible place (including for five (5) years after this Code is no longer in effect).

B. A record of any violation of this Code and of any action taken as a result of such violation shall be preserved in an easily accessible place for a period of not less than five (5) years following the end of the fiscal year in which the violation occurs.

C. A copy of each report to the Board and each report, including any information provided in lieu of the report, made by an Access Person pursuant to this Code shall be preserved for a period of not less than five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year in which it is made, the first two years in an easily accessible place.

D. A list of all Access Persons who are, or within the past five (5) years have been, required to make reports pursuant to this Code shall be maintained in an easily accessible place.

E. A record of any decision, and the reasons supporting the decision, to approve the acquisition by Investment Personnel of securities under Section V of this Code shall be preserved for at least five years after the end of the fiscal year in which the approval is granted, the first two years in an easily accessible place.

IX. Approval, Amendment and Interpretation of Provisions

A. This Code may be amended as necessary or appropriate with the approval of the Boards.

B. This Code is subject to interpretation by the Boards in their discretion.

Dated: January 16, 2004, as amended October 18, 2011.

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P.

The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P.

Code of Ethics (Rule 17j-1)

QUARTERLY SECURITIES TRANSACTION REPORT¹

This report of personal securities transactions pursuant to the Code of Ethics is required by Rule 17j-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The report must be completed, signed, and submitted not later than 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter. Refer to the Code of Ethics for further instructions. If you have no transactions to report, please check the box below and sign the Report.

Name of Reporting Person:                                                                                           

Date Became Subject to the Code’s Reporting Requirements:	________	For The Calendar Quarter Ended:	______
Date Report Due (no later than 30 days after the end of a calendar quarter):	________	Date Report Submitted:	______

Securities Transactions During the Quarter

No Transactions to Report (check if applicable) [            ]

Date of Transaction Title of Security Nature of
Transaction
(Purchase/Sale/
Other²) No. of
Shares/
Securities Principal
Amount,
Maturity Date
and Interest
Rate
(as applicable) Price Executing Broker,
Dealer or Other
Party Through
Whom
Transaction
Was Made

(Continue transaction record on next page if necessary.)

Securities Accounts Opened During the Quarter

If you have no new securities accounts to report, please check here. [            ]

Name of Broker, Dealer or Bank

¹  This report must be completed in accordance with the Code of Ethics. Filing of this Report is required whether or not transactions occurred.

²  If the transaction is other than a straightforward sale or purchase of securities, mark it with an asterisk and explain the nature of the transaction on the reverse side. Describe the nature of each account in which the transaction is to take place, i.e., personal, spouse, children, charitable trust, etc. If you wish, you may attach a copy of your account statements as provided to you by your broker, bank or custodian.

I represent that I am not in possession of material non-public information concerning the securities listed above or their issues. If I am an Access Person charged with making recommendations concerning the portfolios of the Funds with respect to any of the securities listed above, I hereby represent that I have not determined or been requested to make a recommendation in any of the securities listed above except as permitted by the Code of Ethics. This report is not an admission that I have direct or indirect beneficial ownership of any of the securities reported above.

  (Signature)   (Date)

(Transaction record continued from previous page.)

Date of Transaction Title of Security Nature of
Transaction
(Purchase/Sale/
Other²) No. of
Shares/
Securities Principal
Amount,
Maturity Date
and Interest
Rate
(as applicable) Price Executing Broker,
Dealer or Other
Party Through
Whom
Transaction
Was Made

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P.

The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P.

Code of Ethics (Rule 17j-1)

INITIAL HOLDINGS REPORT

This report shall set forth information on your securities holdings in which you have a direct or indirect beneficial interest, including holdings by a spouse, minor children, trusts, foundations, and any account for which trading authority has been delegated to you or any Fund, as required by the Funds’ Code of Ethics. In lieu of listing each security position below, you may instead authorize your broker to mail duplicate copies of your brokerage statements to the Funds’ CCO. (Please see the Code of Ethics for more information.)

Name of Reporting Person:                                                                                                                                                

Date Became Subject to the Code’s Reporting Requirements:	Information in Report Dated As Of (must be current as of a date no more than 45 days before Date Became Subject to the Code’s Reporting Requirements):
Date Report Due (no later than 10 days after became Access Person):	Date Report Submitted:

Securities Holdings*

Title of Security Number of Shares Principal Amount

(Continue holdings record on next page if necessary.)

If you have no securities holdings to report, please check here. [    ]

Securities Accounts

Name of Broker, Dealer or Bank in which Securities are Held

If you have no securities accounts to report, please check here. [            ]

I certify that I have included on this report all securities holdings and accounts required to be reported pursuant to the Code of Ethics. This report is not an admission that I have direct or indirect beneficial ownership of any of the securities reported above.

  (Signature)   (Date)

* Securities that are EXEMPT from being reported on this Form include: (i) securities that are direct obligations of the U. S. Government, such as Treasury bills, notes and bonds, and U.S. Savings Bonds and derivatives thereof; (ii) high quality short-term instruments (“money market instruments”) including but not limited to bankers’ acceptances, U.S. bank certificates of deposit; commercial paper; and repurchase agreements; (iii) shares of the registered open-end investment companies; and (iv) currencies.

(Holdings record continued from previous page.)

Title of Security Number of Shares Principal Amount

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P.

The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P.

Code of Ethics (Rule 17j-1)

ANNUAL HOLDINGS REPORT

This report shall set forth information on your securities holdings in which you have a direct or indirect beneficial interest, including holdings by a spouse, minor children, trusts, foundations, and any account for which trading authority has been delegated to you or any Fund, as required by the Funds’ Code of Ethics. In lieu of listing each security position below, you may instead authorize your broker to mail duplicate copies of your brokerage statements to the Funds’ CCO. (Please see the Code of Ethics for more information.)

Name of Reporting Person:                                                                                                                                            

Date Became Subject to the Code’s Reporting Requirements:	Information in Report Dated As Of (must be current as of a date no more than 45 days before Date Report Submitted):
For Year Ended:	Date Report Submitted:

Securities Holdings*

Title of Security No. of Shares Principal Amount

(Continue holdings record on next page if necessary.)

If you have no securities holdings to report for the year, please check here. [    ]

Securities Accounts

Name of Broker, Dealer or Bank

If you have no securities accounts to report for the year, please check here. [    ]

I certify that I have included on this report all securities holdings and accounts required to be reported pursuant to the Code of Ethics. This report is not an admission that I have direct or indirect beneficial ownership of any of the securities reported above.

  (Signature)   (Date)

* Securities that are EXEMPT from being reported on this Form include: (i) securities that are direct obligations of the U. S. Government, such as Treasury bills, notes and bonds, and U.S. Savings Bonds and derivatives thereof; (ii) high quality short-term instruments (“money market instruments”) including but not limited to bankers’ acceptances, U.S. bank certificates of deposit; commercial paper; and repurchase agreements; (iii) shares of the registered open-end investment companies; and (iv) currencies.

(Holdings record continued from previous page.)

Title of Security Number of Shares Principal Amount

Exhibit D

The Endowment Master Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P.

The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P.

The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund, L.P.

Code of Ethics (Rule 17j-1)

ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE

Name of Person Certifying:                                                                                                                                                                    

Access Persons shall complete this Code of Ethics Certification of Compliance upon the receipt and review of this Code of Ethics and on an annual basis thereafter.

I have read and understand the Code of Ethics referenced above and certify that I am in compliance with it and have disclosed or reported all personal securities transactions required to be disclosed or reported pursuant to the Code of Ethics.

  (Signature)   (Date)

EX-99.PROXY

THE ENDOWMENT MASTER FUND, L.P.

(the “Master Fund”)

THE ENDOWMENT REGISTERED FUND, L.P.

THE ENDOWMENT TEI FUND, L.P.

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL FUND, L.P.

THE ENDOWMENT INSTITUTIONAL TEI FUND W, L.P.

(each, a “Feeder Fund”)

(collectively, the “Funds”)

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

I. Statement of Principle

The Funds seek to assure that proxies received by the Funds are voted in the best interests of the Funds’ stockholders and have accordingly adopted these procedures.

II. Delegation of Proxy Voting/Adoption of Adviser and Sub-Adviser Policies

Except as provided in Section III below, each Fund delegates the authority to vote proxies related to portfolio securities to Endowment Advisers, L.P. (the “Adviser”), as investment adviser to each Fund. For each portion of the Fund’s portfolio managed by a sub-adviser retained to provide day-to-day portfolio management for that portion of the Fund’s portfolio (each, a “Sub-Adviser”), the Adviser in turn may delegate its proxy voting authority to the Sub-Adviser responsible for that portion of the Fund’s portfolio. The Board of Directors of each Fund adopts the proxy voting policies and procedures of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers as the proxy voting policies and procedures that will be used by each of these respective entities when exercising voting authority on behalf of the Fund. These policies and procedures are attached hereto.

III. Retention of Proxy Voting Authority

With respect to proxies issued by the Master Fund, the Feeder Funds do not delegate to the Adviser, but instead retain, their proxy voting authority. After receiving a proxy issued by the Master Fund, the Feeder Fund will hold a meeting of its Partners at which the Partners will vote their Interests to instruct the Feeder Fund to vote for or against the matter presented by the Master Fund. The Feeder Fund will then calculate the proportion of Interests voted for to those voted against (ignoring for purposes of this calculation the Interests for which it receives no voting instructions) and will subsequently vote its Interests in the Master Fund for or against the matter in the same proportion.

IV. Consent in the Event of a Conflict of Interest

If for a particular proxy vote the Adviser or Sub-Adviser seeks a Fund’s consent to vote because of a conflict of interest or for other reasons, any two independent directors of the Fund may provide the Fund’s consent to vote.

V. Annual Review of Proxy Voting Policies of Adviser and Sub-Advisers

The Board of Directors of each Fund will review on an annual basis the proxy voting policies of the Adviser and Sub-Advisers applicable to the Fund.

Dated: March 10, 2004, as revised June 6, 2010.

ENDOWMENT ADVISERS, L.P.

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The following are proxy voting policies and procedures (“Policies and Procedures”) adopted by Endowment Advisers, LP (“Endowment Advisers”), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (“Advisers Act”), with respect to voting securities held by client portfolios. Clients include The Endowment Registered Fund, L.P., The Endowment TEI Fund, L.P., The Endowment Institutional Fund, L.P., and The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. and The Endowment Master Fund, L.P. (the “Funds”) each of which is an investment company registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”), and may include in the future other registered investment companies as well as individuals, partnerships and corporations. These Policies and Procedures are adopted to ensure compliance by Endowment Advisers with Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act and other applicable fiduciary obligations under rules and regulations of the SEC and interpretations of its staff. Endowment Advisers follows these Policies and Procedures for each of its clients as required under the Advisers Act and other applicable law, unless expressly directed by a client in writing to refrain from voting that client’s proxies or to vote in accordance with the client’s proxy voting policies and procedures. With respect to the Funds, Endowment Advisers follows both these Policies and Procedures and the proxy voting policies and procedures adopted by the Funds and their Boards of Directors.

I. Definitions

A. “Best interest of clients”. In the view of Endowment Advisers, this means clients’ best economic interest over the long term — that is, the common interest that all clients share in seeing the value of a common investment increase over time. Clients may have differing political or social interests, but their best economic interest is generally uniform.

B. “Material conflict of interest”. Circumstances when Endowment Advisers, or any member of its senior management or any of its portfolio managers or portfolio analysts, knowingly does business with a particular proxy issuer or closely affiliated entity which may appear to create a material conflict between the interests of Endowment Advisers and the interests of its clients in how proxies of that issuer are voted.

II. General Policy

Where Endowment Advisers is given responsibility for voting proxies, we must take reasonable steps under the circumstances to ensure that proxies are received and voted with a view to enhancing the value of the shares of stock held in client accounts.

These Policies and Procedures expressly address the voting of proxies or securities with respect to which the issuers solicit proxies to vote on proposals that are put to a vote of shareholders. Each Fund may invest all or some portion of its assets in the securities of privately placed investment vehicles (“Private Investment Funds”), which do not typically convey traditional

Exhibit F

voting rights to the holder, and the occurrence of corporate governance or other notices for this type of investment is substantially less than that encountered in connection with registered equity securities. On occasion, however, each Fund or its general partner(s) may receive notices from the Private Investment Funds seeking the consent of holders in order to materially change certain rights within the structure of the security issued by the Private Investment Fund or change material terms of the Private Investment Fund’s constituent documents. Endowment Advisers shall follow these Policies and Procedures, to the extent applicable, in exercising the rights of the Funds to vote or consent in connection with its investments in Private Investment Funds. The Advisor shall take such action as may be necessary to enable the Funds to comply with all disclosure and recordkeeping obligations imposed by applicable rules and regulations.

The financial interest of our clients is the primary consideration in determining how proxies should be voted. In the case of social and political responsibility issues that in our view do not primarily involve financial considerations, the diversity of our clients means that we are unable to represent each such view in each instance. Thus, Endowment Advisers exercises its vote on these issues in what it believes to be the best economic interests of its clients unless a private account client has provided specific instructions otherwise for its voting securities. When making specific proxy decisions, Endowment Advisers generally adheres to its specific voting policies contained in Section VI herein. The guidelines set forth positions of Endowment Advisers on recurring issues and criteria for addressing non-recurring issues. The general voting policies of Endowment Advisers are described below.

III. General Voting Policies

A. Client’s Best Interest. These Policies and Procedures are designed and implemented in a way that is reasonably expected to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of clients. Proxies will be voted with the aim of furthering the best economic interests of clients, promoting high levels of corporate governance and adequate disclosure of company policies, activities and returns, including fair and equal treatment of shareholders.

B. Shareholder Activism. Endowment Advisers seeks to develop relationships with the management of portfolio companies to encourage transparency and improvements in the treatment of owners and stakeholders. Thus, Endowment Advisers may engage in dialogue with the management of portfolio companies with respect to pending proxy voting issues.

C. Case-by-Case Basis. While these Policies and Procedures guide our decisions, each proxy vote is ultimately cast on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the contractual obligations under the advisory agreement or comparable document, and all other relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote. Endowment Advisers may cast proxy votes in favor of management proposals or seek to change the views of management, considering specific issues as they arise on their merits. Endowment Advisers may also join with other investment managers in seeking to submit a shareholder proposal to a company or to oppose a proposal submitted by the company. Any such action is primarily based on grounds of fundamental share value.

Exhibit F

D. Individualized. These Policies and Procedures are tailored to suit the advisory business of Endowment Advisers and the types of securities portfolios it manages. To the extent that clients have adopted their own procedures, Endowment Advisers may vote the same securities differently depending upon clients’ directions.

E. Material Conflicts of Interest. Material conflicts are resolved in the best interest of clients. When a material conflict of interest between Endowment Advisers and its respective client(s) is identified, Endowment Advisers will choose among the procedures set forth in Section IV.B.2.b., below, to resolve such conflict.

F. Limitations. The circumstances under which Endowment Advisers may take a limited role in voting proxies, include the following.

1. No Responsibility. Endowment Advisers will not vote proxies for client accounts in which the client contract specifies that Endowment Advisers will not vote. Under such circumstances, the clients’ custodians (“Custodians”) are instructed to mail proxy material directly to such clients.

2. Limited Value. Endowment Advisers may abstain from voting a client proxy if the effect on shareholders’ economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.

3. Unjustifiable Costs. Endowment Advisers may abstain from voting a client proxy for cost reasons.

4. Securities Lending Arrangements. If voting securities are part of a securities lending program, Endowment Advisers may be unable to vote while the securities are on loan.

5. Special Considerations. The responsibilities of Endowment Advisers for voting proxies are determined generally by its obligations under each advisory contract or similar document. If a client requests in writing that Endowment Advisers vote its proxy in a manner inconsistent with these Policies and Procedures, Endowment Advisers may follow the client’s direction or may request that the client vote the proxy directly. As a courtesy to certain clients, Endowment Advisers may, from time to time, agree to vote proxies on securities over which Endowment Advisers holds no discretionary management authority. Endowment Advisers is under no obligation to vote these securities as they are not part of the clients’ managed accounts, Endowment Advisers exercises no discretion over such securities, and they are not generally included in the securities which Endowment Advisers follows as an investment adviser. To the extent that Endowment Advisers has agreed to perform the courtesy service of mechanically casting the vote on any such securities and no specific voting instructions are provided by the client(s), Endowment Advisers will not research the companies and will either vote with management or abstain unless the security being voted happens to be covered by Endowment Advisers in its capacity as investment adviser.

G. Sources of Information. Endowment Advisers may conduct research internally and/or use the resources of an independent research consultant. Endowment Advisers may consider legislative materials, studies of corporate governance and other proxy voting issues, and/or analyses of shareholder and management proposals by a certain sector of companies, e.g. small cap companies.

Exhibit F

H. Availability of Policies and Procedures. Endowment Advisers will provide clients with a copy of these Policies and Procedures, as revised from time to time, upon request.

I. Disclosure of Vote. As described in Part 2A of Endowment Advisers Form ADV, a client may obtain information on how its proxies were voted by requesting such information from Endowment Advisers. Endowment Advisers does not generally disclose client proxy votes to third parties, other than as required for the Funds, unless specifically requested, in writing, by the client.

IV. Proxy Voting Procedures

A. General

1. Accounts for Which Endowment Advisers Has Proxy Voting Responsibility

Endowment Advisers is generally responsible for voting proxies with respect to securities held in client accounts unless the investment management agreement explicitly states that Endowment Advisers will not vote proxies for the account. Endowment Advisers is not responsible for voting client securities which are not part of the managed account. However, Endowment Advisers may, as a courtesy, vote certain client securities which are not part of the managed account at the request of its clients subject to the limitations described in Section III.F.5., above.

2. Adherence to Client Proxy Voting Policies

If a client has its own proxy voting policy, Endowment Advisers and the client will agree in writing on whether Endowment Advisers will vote in accordance with its own policy, whether Endowment Advisers will vote that client’s securities in accordance with the client’s policy or whether the client will vote its own securities.

3. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Intentions

Endowment Advisers personnel should not discuss with members of the public how Endowment Advisers intends to vote on any particular proxy proposal. This does not restrict communications in the ordinary course of business with other clients for which Endowment Advisers votes proxies. Disclosure of Endowment Advisers’ proxy voting intentions – especially where done with the purpose or effect of influencing the management or control of a company – could trigger various restrictions under the federal securities laws, including under the proxy solicitation, beneficial ownership and short-swing profit liability provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event that Endowment Advisers wishes to discuss its voting intentions outside the firm, Endowment Advisers should consult with its counsel before any such discussions.

Exhibit F

B. Operational Procedures

1. Role of the Proxy Administrator

Once a client account is established and the proxy voting responsibility is determined, the Proxy Administrator (“PA”), is responsible for receiving and processing proxies for securities held in the portfolios of our clients and ensuring that votes are cast. The PA is responsible for ensuring that the registered owners of record, e.g. the client, trustee or custodian bank, that receive proxy materials from the issuer or its information agent, forward proxy materials to Endowment Advisers. Proxies may also be delivered electronically through a proxy service. The PA logs in any proxy materials received, matches them to the securities to be voted and confirms that the correct amount of shares, as of the record date, is reflected on the proxy. Once the proxy statement is logged in, the PA gives it to a research analyst (“Analyst”) for consideration.

The PA also compiles and maintains information, for each client for which Endowment Advisers votes proxies, showing the issuer’s name, meeting date and manner in which it voted on each proxy proposal. The PA is also responsible for monitoring compliance with client proxy voting policies. A copy of each proxy statement is kept. Endowment Advisers generally seeks to vote proxies at least one (1) week prior to the deadline. Unfortunately, proxy materials are often received with less than a week’s time before the deadline, and in such cases, Endowment Advisers uses reasonable efforts to exercise its vote.

2. Material Conflicts of Interest

a. Endowment Advisers will take steps to identify the existence of any material conflicts of interest relating to the securities to be voted or the issue at hand. Senior management, portfolio managers and Analysts of Endowment Advisers are expected to disclose to the PA any personal conflicts such as officer or director positions held by them, their spouses or close relatives in the portfolio company. Conflicts based on business relationships or dealings of affiliates of Endowment Advisers will only be considered to the extent that the Endowment Advisers has actual knowledge of such business relationships.

b. When a material conflict of interest between Endowment Advisers’ interests and its clients’ interests appears to exist, Endowment Advisers may choose among the following options to eliminate such conflict: (1) vote in accordance with these Policies and Procedures if it involves little or no discretion; (2) vote as recommended by a third-party service if Endowment Advisers utilizes such a service; (3) “echo vote” or “mirror vote” the proxies in the same proportion as the votes of other proxy holders that are not clients of Endowment Advisers; (4) if possible, erect information barriers around the person or persons making voting decisions sufficient to insulate the decision from the conflict; (5) if practical, notify affected clients of the conflict of interest and seek a waiver of the conflict; or (6) if agreed upon in writing with the client, forward the proxies to affected clients allowing them to vote their own proxies.

3. Role of the Research Analysts

The PA ensures that each proxy statement is directed to the Analyst responsible for following the particular security or industry. The Analysts are responsible for considering the substantive issues relating to any vote, deciding how the shares will be voted, and instructing the PA how to vote the proxies. In determining how to vote a given proxy, Analysts will adhere to these Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, as revised from time to time, except to the extent superseded by client proxy voting policies or to the extent that a material conflict of interest is identified. In the event of a personal material conflict of interest, the Analyst will refer the decision to another Endowment Advisers Analyst who has no such conflict. In the event of an organizational

Exhibit F

conflict, Endowment Advisers will follow the procedures outlined in Section IV.B.2.b., above. If there is no material conflict of interest, the vote recommendation will be forwarded to the PA to be cast. The Analyst may consult with the PA and/or Senior Management as necessary to identify and resolve conflicts. Analysts are responsible for documenting the rationale for any vote recommendation.

4. Role of the Third-Party Service Provider(s)

Endowment Advisers may engage a third-party service provider to provide notification of impending votes, including shareholder resolutions, which may be viewed on-line. In addition, Endowment Advisers may engage a third-party service provider to provide web-based proxy voting and recordkeeping services.

V. Documentation, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements

A. Documentation. The PA is responsible for:

1. implementing and updating these Policies and Procedures;

2. overseeing the proxy voting process;

3. consulting with Analysts for the relevant portfolio security; and

4. maintaining proxy voting records.

B. Recordkeeping.

1. Endowment Advisers will maintain records of all proxies voted.

2. As required by Rule 204-2(c), such records will include: (a) a copy of the Policies and Procedures; (b) a copy of any document created by Endowment Advisers that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies on behalf of a client or that memorializes the basis for that decision; and (c) each written client request for proxy voting records and Endowment Advisers’ written response to any (written or oral) client request for such records.

3. Endowment Advisers will maintain its own proxy statements and record of votes cast. As permitted by Rule 204-2(c), proxy statements and the record of each vote cast by each client account will be maintained by Broadridge. Endowment Advisers has obtained an undertaking from Broadridge to provide Endowment Advisers copies of proxy voting records and other documents promptly upon request. Endowment Advisers or Broadridge may rely on the SEC’s EDGAR system to keep records of certain proxy statements if the proxy statements are maintained by issuers on that system (e.g., large U.S.-based issuers).

4. Duration. Proxy voting books and records will be maintained in an easily accessible place for a period of five years, the first two in Endowment Advisers’ office.

Exhibit F

C. Reporting. Endowment Advisers will initially inform clients of these Policies and Procedures and how a client may learn of the voting record for client’s securities through summary disclosure in Part 2A of Endowment Advisers’ Form ADV. Upon receipt of a client’s request for more information, Endowment Advisers will provide to the client a copy of these Policies and Procedures and/or, in accordance with the client’s stated requirements, how the client’s proxies were voted during the period requested subsequent to the adoption of these Policies and Procedures. Such periodic reports, other than those required for the Funds, will not be made available to third parties absent the express written request of the client.

Review of Policies and Procedures. These Policies and Procedures will be subject to period review as deemed appropriate by Endowment Advisers.

VI. Specific Voting Policies

A. Summary.

Endowment Advisers’ current policies with respect to a number of common issues are briefly summarized as follows:

• Endowment Advisers generally votes with the recommendations of a company’s Board of Directors on routine or non-controversial issues (see examples below).

• In general, Endowment Advisers opposes anti-takeover proposals, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise.

• In general, Endowment Advisers votes to support the elimination of anti-takeover policies, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise.

• On issues relating to social and/or political responsibility, Endowment Advisers votes all client shares in what we believe to be the best economic interests of our clients unless directed by a client to vote in a certain manner.

• Proposals not covered by the above-stated guidelines and contested situations are evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Analyst principally responsible for the particular security.

B. Examples of Proxy Voting With Management On Non-Controversial Matters.

• Election of directors, in the absence of a contest or controversy.

• Ratification of selection of independent auditors, in the absence of controversy.

• Stock option plans for executives, employees or directors which would not increase the aggregate number of shares of stock available for grant under all currently active plans to over 10% of the total number of shares outstanding, and which Endowment Advisers does not oppose for other valid reasons.

• Stock splits, if not for anti-takeover purposes.

• Change of state of incorporation for specific corporate purposes and not for anti-takeover purposes.

• Employee stock purchase plans and employee stock ownership plans permitting purchase of company stock at 85% or more of fair market value.

Exhibit F

C. Guidelines for Specific Proxy Voting Issues.

1. The Board of Directors

a. Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections

Votes on director nominees are made on a case-by-case basis, examining the following factors:

¡ Long-term corporate performance record relative to a market index;

¡ Composition of board and key board committees;

¡ Nominee’s attendance at meetings (past two years);

¡ Nominee’s investment in the company;

¡ Whether a retired CEO sits on the board; and

¡ Whether the chairman is also serving as CEO.

In cases of significant votes and when information is readily available, we also review:

¡ Corporate governance provisions and takeover activity;

¡ Board decisions regarding executive pay;

¡ Director compensation;

¡ Number of other board seats held by nominee; and

¡ Interlocking directorships.

b. Chairman and CEO are the Same Person

We vote on a case-by-case basis on shareholder proposals that would require the positions of chairman and CEO to be held by different persons.

c. Majority of Independent Directors

Shareholder proposals that request that the board be comprised of a majority of independent directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

We vote for shareholder proposals that request that the board audit, compensation and/or nominating committees include independent directors exclusively.

d. Stock Ownership Requirements

We generally vote against shareholder proposals requiring directors to own a minimum amount of company stock in order to qualify as a director, or to remain on the board.

e. Term of Office

We generally vote against shareholder proposals to limit the tenure of outside directors.

f. Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection

Proposals concerning director and officer indemnification and liability protection are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Exhibit F

We generally vote against proposals to limit or eliminate entirely director and officer liability for monetary damages for violating the duty of care.

We generally vote against indemnification proposals that would expand coverage beyond just legal expenses to acts, such as negligence, that are more serious violations of fiduciary obligations than mere carelessness.

We generally vote for only those proposals that provide such expanded coverage in cases when a director’s or officer’s legal defense was unsuccessful if: (1) the director was found to have acted in good faith and in a manner that he reasonably believed was in the best interests of the company, and (2) only if the director’s legal expenses would be covered.

2. Charitable Contributions

We generally vote against shareholder proposals to eliminate, direct or otherwise restrict charitable contributions.

3. Proxy Contests

a. Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections

Votes in a contested election of directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, considering the following factors:

¡ Long-term financial performance of the target company relative to its industry;

¡ Management’s track record;

¡ Background to the proxy contest;

¡ Qualifications of director nominees (both slates);

¡ Evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders as well as the likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be met; and

¡ Stock ownership positions.

b. Reimburse Proxy Solicitation Expenses

Decisions to provide full reimbursement for dissidents waging a proxy contest are made on a case-by-case basis.

4. Auditors

We generally vote for proposals to ratify auditors, unless: an auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent; or there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion which is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position.

5. Proxy Contest Defenses

a. Board Structure: Staggered vs. Annual Elections

Exhibit F

We generally vote against proposals to classify the board.

We vote for proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors annually.

b. Shareholder Ability to Remove Directors

We vote against proposals that provide that directors may be removed only for cause.

We vote for proposals to restore shareholder ability to remove directors with or without cause.

We vote against proposals that provide that only continuing directors may elect replacements to fill board vacancies.

We vote for proposals that permit shareholders to elect directors to fill board vacancies.

c. Cumulative Voting

We vote against proposals to eliminate cumulative voting.

We vote for proposals to permit cumulative voting.

d. Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings

We vote against proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to call special meetings.

We vote for proposals that remove restrictions on the right of shareholders to act independently of management.

e. Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent

We vote against proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to take action by written consent.

We vote for proposals to allow or make easier shareholder action by written consent.

f. Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals that seek to fix the size of the board.

We vote against proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the board without shareholder approval.

6. Tender Offer Defenses

a. Poison Pills

We vote for shareholder proposals that ask a company to submit its poison pill for shareholder ratification.

Exhibit F

We review on a case-by-case basis shareholder proposals to redeem a company’s poison pill.

We review on a case-by-case basis management proposals to ratify a poison pill.

b. Fair Price Provisions

We vote case-by-case on fair price proposals, taking into consideration whether the shareholder vote requirement embedded in the provision is no more than a majority of disinterested shares.

We vote for shareholder proposals to lower the shareholder vote requirement in existing fair price provisions.

c. Greenmail

We vote for proposals to adopt anti-greenmail charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise restrict a company’s ability to make greenmail payments.

We review on a case-by-case basis anti-greenmail proposals when they are bundled with other charter or bylaw amendments.

d. Pale Greenmail

We review on a case-by-case basis restructuring plans that involve the payment of pale greenmail.

e. Unequal Voting Rights

We vote against dual class exchange offers.

We vote against dual class recapitalizations.

f. Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement to Amend the Charter or Bylaws

We vote against management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments.

We vote for shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for charter and bylaw amendments.

g. Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement to Approve Mergers

We vote against management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve mergers and other significant business combinations.

We vote for shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for mergers and other significant business combinations.

h. White Squire Placements

Exhibit F

We vote for shareholder proposals to require approval of blank check preferred stock issues for other than general corporate purposes.

7. Miscellaneous Governance Provisions

a. Confidential Voting

We vote for shareholder proposals that request corporations to adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators and use independent inspectors of election as long as the proposals include clauses for proxy contests as follows: in the case of a contested election, management is permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents do not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.

We vote for management proposals to adopt confidential voting.

b. Equal Access

We vote for shareholder proposals that would allow significant company shareholders equal access to management’s proxy material in order to evaluate and propose voting recommendations on proxy proposals and director nominees, and in order to nominate their own candidates to the board.

c. Bundled Proposals

We review on a case-by-case basis bundled or “conditioned” proxy proposals. In the case of items that are conditioned upon each other, we examine the benefits and costs of the packaged items. In instances when the joint effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders’ best interest, we vote against the proposals. If the combined effect is positive, we support such proposals.

d. Shareholder Advisory Committees

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to establish a shareholder advisory committee.

8. Capital Structure

a. Common Stock Authorization

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issue.

We vote against proposed common stock authorizations that increase the existing authorization by more than 100 percent unless a clear need for the excess shares is presented by the company.

b. Stock Distributions: Splits and Dividends

Exhibit F

We vote for management proposals to increase common share authorization for a stock split, provided that the split does not result in an increase of authorized but unissued shares of more than 100% after giving effect to the shares needed for the split.

c. Reverse Stock Splits

We vote for management proposals to implement a reverse stock split, provided that the reverse split does not result in an increase of authorized but unissued shares of more than 100% after giving effect to the shares needed for the reverse split.

d. Blank Check Preferred Authorization

We vote for proposals to create blank check preferred stock in cases when the company expressly states that the stock will not be used as a takeover defense or carry superior voting rights.

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals that would authorize the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend and distribution, and other rights.

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to increase the number of authorized blank check preferred shares.

e. Shareholder Proposals Regarding Blank Check Preferred Stock

We vote for shareholder proposals to have blank check preferred stock placements, other than those shares issued for the purpose of raising capital or making acquisitions in the normal course of business, submitted for shareholder ratification.

f. Adjust Par Value of Common Stock

We vote for management proposals to reduce the par value of common stock.

g. Pre-emptive Rights

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to create or abolish pre-emptive rights. In evaluating proposals on preemptive rights, we look at the size of a company and the characteristics of its shareholder base.

h. Debt Restructurings

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt-restructuring plan. We consider the following issues:

Dilution – How much will ownership interest of existing shareholders be reduced, and how extreme will dilution be to any future earnings?

Change in Control – Will the transaction result in a change in control of the company?

Exhibit F

Bankruptcy – Is the threat of bankruptcy, which would result in severe losses in shareholder value, the main factor driving the debt restructuring?

Generally, we approve proposals that facilitate debt restructurings unless there are clear signs of self-dealing or other abuses.

i. Share Repurchase Programs

We vote for management proposals to institute open-market share repurchase plans in which all shareholders may participate on equal terms.

9. Executive and Director Compensation

In general, we vote on a case-by-case basis on executive and director compensation plans, with the view that viable compensation programs reward the creation of shareholder wealth by having a high payout sensitivity to increases in shareholder value.

Other factors, such as repricing underwater stock options without shareholder approval, would cause us to vote against a plan. Additionally, in some cases we would vote against a plan deemed unnecessary.

a. OBRA-Related Compensation Proposals

¡ Amendments that Place a Cap on Annual Grant or Amend Administrative Features

Vote for plans that simply amend shareholder-approved plans to include administrative features or place a cap on the annual grants any one participant may receive to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (“OBRA”).

¡ Amendments to Add Performance-Based Goals

We vote for amendments to add performance goals to existing compensation plans to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.

¡ Amendments to Increase Shares and Retain Tax Deductions Under OBRA

Votes on amendments to existing plans to increase shares reserved and to qualify the plan for favorable tax treatment under the provisions of Section 162(m) should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

¡ Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans

We vote for cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans to exempt the compensation from taxes under the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.

b. Shareholder Proposals to Limit Executive and Director Pay

We review on a case-by-case basis all shareholder proposals that seek additional disclosure of executive and director pay information.

Exhibit F

We review on a case-by-case basis all other shareholder proposals that seek to limit executive and director pay.

c. Golden and Tin Parachutes

We vote for shareholder proposals to have golden and tin parachutes submitted for shareholder ratification.

We review on a case-by-case basis all proposals to ratify or cancel golden or tin parachutes.

d. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)

We vote for proposals that request shareholder approval in order to implement an ESOP or to increase authorized shares for existing ESOPs, except in cases when the number of shares allocated to the ESOP is “excessive” (i.e., generally greater than five percent of outstanding shares).

e. 401(k) Employee Benefit Plans

We vote for proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.

10. State of Incorporation

a. Voting on State Takeover Statutes

We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisitions statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freeze-out provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions, anti-greenmail provisions, and disgorgement provisions).

b. Voting on Reincorporation Proposals

Proposals to change a company’s state of incorporation are examined on a case-by-case basis.

11. Mergers and Corporate Restructurings

a. Mergers and Acquisitions

Votes on mergers and acquisitions are considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account at least the following:

¡ Anticipated financial and operating benefits;

¡ Offer price (cost vs. premium);

¡ Prospects of the combined companies;

¡ How the deal was negotiated; and

¡ Changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.

Exhibit F

b. Corporate Restructuring

Votes on corporate restructuring proposals, including minority squeeze-outs, leveraged buyouts, spin-offs, liquidations, and asset sales are considered on a case-by-case basis.

c. Spin-offs

Votes on spin-offs are considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the tax and regulatory advantages, planned use of sale proceeds, market focus, and managerial incentives.

d. Asset Sales

Votes on asset sales are made on a case-by-case basis after considering the impact on the balance sheet/working capital, value received for the asset, and potential elimination of diseconomies.

e. Liquidations

Votes on liquidations are made on a case-by-case basis after reviewing management’s efforts to pursue other alternatives, appraisal value of assets, and the compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.

f. Appraisal Rights

We vote for proposals to restore, or provide shareholders with, rights of appraisal.

g. Changing Corporate Name

We vote for changing the corporate name.

12. Mutual Fund Proxies

a. Election of Trustees

We vote on trustee nominees on a case-by-case basis.

b. Investment Advisory Agreement

We vote on investment advisory agreements on a case-by-case basis.

c. Fundamental Investment Restrictions

We vote on amendments to a fund’s fundamental investment restrictions on a case-by-case basis.

d. Distribution Agreements

We vote on distribution agreements on a case-by-case basis.

13. Social and Environmental Issues

We consider shareholder social and environmental proposals on a case-by-case basis.

Dated: January 16, 2004, as amended March 17, 2005 and June 20, 2007 and August 2010.

Exhibit F

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew B. Linbeck, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

February 27, 2014	/s/ Andrew B. Linbeck
Date	Andrew B. Linbeck
	Co-Principal Executive Officer

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John A. Blaisdell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

February 27, 2014	/s/ John A. Blaisdell
Date	John A. Blaisdell
	Co-Principal Executive Officer

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John E. Price, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of The Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

February 27, 2014	/s/ John E. Price
Date	John E. Price
	Principal Financial Officer

EX-99.906 CERT

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the period ended December 31, 2013 of the Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “registrant”).

I, John A. Blaisdell, the Co-Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

February 27, 2014

Date

/s/ John A. Blaisdell

John A. Blaisdell

Co-Principal Executive Officer

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the period ended December 31, 2013 of the Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “registrant”).

I, Andrew B. Linbeck, the Co-Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

February 27, 2014

Date

/s/ Andrew B. Linbeck

Andrew B. Linbeck

Co-Principal Executive Officer

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the period ended December 31, 2013 of the Endowment Institutional TEI Fund W, L.P. (the “registrant”).

I, John E. Price, the Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

February 27, 2014

Date

/s/ John E. Price

John E. Price

Principal Financial Officer

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.