XML 71 R52.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Stock-based Compensation (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]  
Compensation Expense Related To Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, which is included in "Salaries, wages, and benefits" in the consolidated income statements is comprised of the following:
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands)
Stock options
$
1,788

 
$
1,734

 
$
1,061

Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards
4,004

 
1,506

 
4,038

Performance units
450

 
801

 
1,913

Stock-based compensation expense – equity awards
$
6,242

 
$
4,041

 
$
7,012

Stock-based compensation expense – liability awards (1)
148

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
6,390

 
4,041

 
7,012

Income tax benefit
$
2,415

 
$
1,515

 
$
2,630

 
 
 
 
 
 

____________
(1)
Includes awards granted to executive management in November 2017 that ultimately settle in cash upon fulfilling a requisite service period (for restricted stock units) and fulfilling a requisite service period and achieving performance targets (for performance units).
Schedule of Unrecognized Compensation Cost, Nonvested Awards [Table Text Block]
The following table presents the total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense and the expected weighted average period over which these expenses will be recognized:
 
December 31, 2017
 
Expense
 
Weighted Average Period
 
(In thousands)
 
(In years)
Equity awards – Stock options
$
3,878

 
1.8
Equity awards – Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards
19,156

 
2.3
Equity awards – Performance units
1,303

 
3.1
Liability awards – Restricted stock units and performance units
3,169

 
2.7
Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense
$
27,506

 
2.3
 
 
 
 
Summary Of Activity Related To Stock Options
A summary of 2017 stock option activity follows:
Stock options outstanding:
Shares Under Option
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
 
 
 
 
 
(In years)
 
(In thousands)
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016
1,737,400

 
$
23.19

 
2.9
 
$
17,200

Granted
497,421

 
33.35

 
 
 
 
Assumed Swift stock options from 2017 Merger
528,466

 
21.93

 
 
 
 
Exercised
(589,020
)
 
21.44

 
 
 
 
Expired
(24,552
)
 
24.44

 
 
 
 
Forfeited
(190,424
)
 
27.96

 
 
 
 
Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017
1,959,291

 
$
25.48

 
3.2
 
$
35,779

Aggregate number of stock options expected to vest at a future date as of December 31, 2017
969,965

 
29.00

 
3.5
 
$
14,283

Exercisable at December 31, 2017
918,594

 
$
21.29

 
2.8
 
$
20,428

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

____________
(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value was computed using the closing share price on December 29, 2017 of $43.72 and on December 30, 2016 of $32.83, as applicable.
Weighted Average Assumptions
The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the fair value computation:
Stock option fair value assumptions:
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Dividend yield (1)
0.72%
 
0.99%
 
0.8%
Risk-free rate of return (2)
1.49%
 
0.90%
 
0.98%
Expected volatility (3)
27.95%
 
27.91%
 
25.88%
Expected term (in years) (4)
3.2
 
2.7
 
2.7
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted
$6.78
 
$4.28
 
$5.00

____________
(1)
The dividend yield assumption is based on Knight's historical experience and anticipated future dividend payouts.
(2)
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on the United States Treasury securities at a constant maturity with a maturity period that most closely resembles the expected term of the stock option award.
(3)
Expected volatility of the Company's Class A common stock is determined based on Knight's historical data.
(4)
The expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and was determined based on an analysis of historical exercise behavior.
Summary Of Exercise Of Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option exercise information for the years presented:
Stock option exercises
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(In thousands, except share data)
Number of stock options exercised
589,020

  
708,244

  
594,673

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
$
8,792

  
$
7,100

  
$
8,300

Cash received upon exercise of stock options
$
13,159

  
$
13,188

  
$
9,930

Income tax benefit
$
1,833

  
$
1,847

  
$
3,175

Rollforward of Company's Nonvested Stock Options
The following table is a rollforward of the Company's unvested stock options:
Unvested stock options:
Shares
  
Weighted Average Fair Value
Unvested stock options at December 31, 2016
1,131,773

  
$
4.39

Granted
497,421

  
6.78

Vested
(398,073
)
  
4.18

Forfeited
(190,424
)
  
5.10

Unvested stock options at December 31, 2017
1,040,697

  
$
5.49

 
 
 
 
Schedule of Grants of Restricted Stock [Table Text Block]
Stock Award Grants
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Stock options
497,421

 
569,480

 
590,141

Restricted stock units and restricted stock awards
266,958

 
17,000

 
13,950

Performance units
44,244

 
177,741

 
165,720

Equity awards granted
808,623

 
764,221

 
769,811

Liability awards granted (1)
77,620

 

 

Total stock awards granted
886,243

 
764,221

 
769,811

 
 
 
 
 
 
____________
(1)
Includes 46,572 performance units and 31,048 restricted stock units
Rollforward of Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards [Table Text Block]
The following table is a rollforward of unvested restricted stock units, including restricted stock units classified as equity and those classified as liabilities:
Unvested restricted stock units:
Number of Awards
 
Weighted Average Fair Value (1)
Unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2016
686,786

  
$
16.46

Granted
298,006

 
36.44

Assumed Swift restricted stock units from 2017 Merger
168,488

 
40.85

Vested
(126,871
)
 
16.77

Forfeited
(46,692
)
  
23.59

Unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2017
979,717

  
$
26.59

 
 
 
 

____________
(1)
The fair value of each restricted stock unit is based on the closing market price on the grant date, except for the Swift restricted stock unit awards assumed, which were re-measured at the Merger Date.
Rollforward of Nonvested Performance Shares [Table Text Block]
The following table is a rollforward of unvested performance units, including performance units classified as equity and those classified as liabilities:
Unvested performance units: 
Shares
  
Weighted Average Fair Value
Unvested performance units at December 31, 2016
508,478

 
$
25.60

Granted (1)
90,816

 
$
40.81

Assumed Swift performance units from 2017 Merger
56,817

 
$
40.85

Shares earned above target
21,117

 
$
23.85

Vested
(519,483
)
 
$
25.53

Forfeited
(10,112
)
 
$
25.40

Unvested performance units at December 31, 2017
147,633

 
$
35.34

 
 
 
 
____________
(1)
The performance measurement period for performance units granted in 2017 is January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 (three full calendar years). These awards will vest one month following the expiration of the performance measurement period
Performance unit fair value assumptions
The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the fair value computation for performance units, including performance units classified as equity and those classified as liabilities:
Performance unit fair value assumptions:
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Dividend yield (1)
0.59
%
 
0.99
%
 
0.80
%
Expected volatility (2)
31.28
%
 
27.95
%
 
23.18
%
Average peer volatility (2)
28.45
%
 
34.37
%
 
30.70
%
Average peer correlation coefficient (3)
0.60

 
0.60

 
0.49

Risk-free interest rate (4)
1.88
%
 
0.89
%
 
0.78
%
Expected term (in years) (5)
3.1

 
2.8

 
2.6

Weighted-average fair value of performance units granted
$
40.81

 
$
23.89

 
$
29.30

____________
(1)
The dividend yield, used to project stock price to the end of the performance period, is based on the Knight's historical experience and future expectation of dividend payouts. Total stockholder return is determined assuming that dividends are reinvested in the issuing entity over the performance period, which is mathematically equivalent to utilizing a 0% dividend yield.
(2)
Management (or peer company) estimated volatility using Knight's (or peer company's) historical share price performance over the remaining performance period as of the grant date.
(3)
The correlation coefficients are used to model the way in which each entity tends to move in relation to each other; the correlation assumptions were developed using the same stock price data as the volatility assumptions.
(4)
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on United States Treasury securities at a constant maturity with a maturity period that most closely resembles the expected term of the performance award.
(5)
Since the Monte Carlo Simulation valuation is an open form model that uses an expected life commensurate with the performance period, the expected life of the performance units was assumed to be the period from the grant date to the end of the performance period.