10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended July 31, 2011

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 333-176555

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	45-0725238
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3651 Lindell Road, Suite D269

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(702) 932-9959

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

BCS Solutions, Inc.

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes

[  ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  [  ]         No  [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  [  ]	Accelerated filer  [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [  ]	Smaller reporting company  [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  [   ]  No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 47,900,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, issued and outstanding as of September 7, 2011.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I  - Financial Information	3
Item 1. Financial Statements	3
Balance Sheets July 31, 2011 (unaudited), and April 30, 2011	3
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three-month periods ended
July 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from  April 21, 2010 (inception) to July 31, 2011	4
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three-month periods ended
July 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from  April 21, 2010 (inception) to July 31, 2011	5
Notes to the Financial Statements	7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	13
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	16
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	16
PART II – Other Information	16
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings	16
Item 1A.  Risk Factors	16
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	17
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	17
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)	17
Item 5. Other Information	17
Item 6. Exhibits	17

2

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

BALANCE SHEETS

	(Unaudited)
	July 31,			April 30,
	2011			2011
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	283,397		$	624
Prepaid Expenses		2,120			-
Total Current Assets		285,517			624
Total Assets	$	285,517		$	624
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	$	6,961		$	5,876
Total Current Liabilities		6,961			5,876
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock, Par Value $.0001
Authorized 300,000,000 shares,
47,900,000 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2011
(April 30, 2011 – 44,400,000)		4,790			4,440
Additional Paid-In Capital		366,210			16,560
Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage		(92,444	)		(26,252	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		278,556			(5,252	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	285,517		$	624

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

							Cumulative
							Since
							April 21, 2010
	For the Three Months Ended						(Inception) to
	July 31,						July 31,
	2011			2010			2011
Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—
Cost of Revenues		—			—			—
Gross Margin		—			—			—
Expenses
Mineral Property Exploration Expenditures		21,396			—			24,620
General and Administrative		24,796			1,162			47,824
Net Loss from Operations		(46,192	)		(1,162	)		(72,444	)
Other Income (Expense)
Interest		—			—			—
Net Other Income (Expense)		—			—			—
Write-down of Mineral Property Acquisition Payments		(20,000)			—			(20,000	)
Net Loss	$	(66,192	)	$	(1,162	)	$	(92,444	)
Basic and Diluted loss per
Share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00)
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding (1)		47,900,000			204,000,000

(1)   Reflects the 17:1 forward stock split completed on March 25, 2011.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

							Cumulative
							Since
							April 21, 2010
	For the Three Months Ended						(Inception) to
	July 31,			July 31,			July 31,
	2011			2010			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss	$	(66,192	)	$	(1,162	)	$	(92,444	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Write-down of Mineral Property Acquisition Costs		20,000			—			20,000
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid Expenses		(2,120)			—			(2,120	)
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable and      Accrued Liabilities		1,085			(2,950	)		6,961
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(47,227	)		(4,112	)		(67,603	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Mineral Property Acquisition Costs		(20,000	)		—			(20,000	)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(20,000	)		—			(20,000	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from Sale of Common Stock		350,000			—			371,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		350,000			—			371,000
Net (Decrease) Increase in
Cash and Cash Equivalents		282,773			(4,112	)		283,397
Cash and Cash Equivalents
at Beginning of Period		624			8,992			—
Cash and Cash Equivalents
at End of Period	$	283,397		$	4,880		$	283,397

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Continued)

					Cumulative
					Since
	For the Three Months Ended				April 21, 2010
	July 31,		July 31,		(Inception) to
	2011		2010		July 31, 2011
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	—	$	—	$	—
Income taxes	$	—	$	—	$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of accounting policies for Grizzly Gold Corp. (formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) is presented to assist in understanding the Company's financial statements.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on a going concern basis.

Organization

Grizzly Gold Corp. (formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) (the "Company")  was incorporated in the State of Florida on April 21, 2010.   The Company was formed to offer small and medium-sized businesses services that reduced invoicing expenses, sped up receipt of monies, and allowed authorization and recovery of paper drafts. The company intended to provide instant cash flow for small and medium-sized businesses and reduced expenses associated with invoicing with services that included pre-authorized checking, electronic payments, electronic check conversion, electronic check recovery, and telephone checks.

On March 14, 2011 the Board of Directors and majority shareholder of the Company approved a 17 for one forward stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock.  The forward stock split was distributed to all shareholders of record on March 25, 2011. No cash was paid or distributed as a result of the forward stock split and no fractional shares were issued. All fractional shares which would otherwise be required to be issued as a result of the stock split were rounded up to the nearest whole share. There was no change in the par value of our common stock.  All references to share and per share amounts have been restated in these financial statements to reflect the split.

On April 5, 2011, the Company’s majority shareholder returned 180,000,000 common shares to the Company for cancellation.  The shares were returned for cancellation in order to reduce the number of shares issued and outstanding.  Subsequent to the cancellation, the Company had 44,400,000 shares issued and outstanding which was a number that the majority shareholder who was also at that time a director of the Company, considered more in line with the Company’s business plans.  Following the share cancellation, the majority shareholder owned 24,000,000 common shares, or 54.05%, of the remaining 44,400,000 issued and outstanding common shares of the Company at that time.

Also on April 5, 2011, the principal shareholder of the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement which provided for the sale of his remaining 24,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company to Jeoffrey Avancena. In connection with the share acquisition, Mr. Avancena was appointed Secretary and Director of the Company and the Board of Directors of the Company elected Mr. Paul Strobel as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and a director of the Company.

On July 8, 2011 our Board of Directors, and on July 5, 2011 our shareholders, approved the change of our name from BCS Solutions, Inc. to Grizzly Gold Corp. Also on July 5, 2011, the shareholders approved a proposal to change the Company's state of incorporation from Florida to Nevada by the merger of BCS Solutions, Inc. with and into its wholly-owned subsidiary, Grizzly Gold Corp., a Nevada corporation. The change of name and jurisdiction became effective on August 1, 2011.

Nature of Operations

The Company is in the development stage and has no products or services as of July 31, 2011.  We are currently a development stage company as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and we are in the business of exploring and if warranted, advancing certain unpatented Nevada mineral claims to the discovery point where we believe maximum shareholder returns can be realized.

7

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Interim Reporting

The unaudited financial information furnished herein reflects all adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state the financial position of Grizzly Gold Corp. and the results of its operations for the periods presented.  This report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.  The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context.  Accordingly, footnote disclosure, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 has been omitted.  The results of operations for the three-month period ended July 31, 2011 is not necessary indicative of results for the entire year ending April 30, 2012.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $92,444 for the period from April 21, 2010 (inception) to July 31, 2011, and has no sales.  The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its mineral property.  The Company expects that it will need approximately $145,400 to fund its operations during the next twelve months which will include property option payments, exploration of its property as well as the costs associated with maintaining an office.  The Company completed a financing on May 1, 2011 for total proceeds of $350,000.  The cash received from this financing is sufficient to fund its planned operations for the next twelve months.  However, in order to develop its property in the future, the Company will need to obtain additional financing.  Management plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offerings of its common stock.  Although there are no assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management currently believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future.

If the Company were unable to continue as a “going concern”, then substantial adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of assets, the reported amounts of its liabilities, the reported expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used.

8

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Management’s Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and notes. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates relate to the write-down of mineral property acquisition costs and accrued liabilities.  Management believes the estimates utilized in preparing these financial statements are reasonable and prudent and are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the financial statements for the period ended July 31, 2010 to conform to accounting and financial statement presentation for the period ended July 31, 2011.

Foreign Currency

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar and to date has undertaken the majority of its transactions in U.S. dollars. Any transaction gains and losses that may take place will be included in the statement of operations as they occur.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company has no off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company maintains all of its cash balances with one financial institution in the form of a demand deposit.

Loss per Share

Net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. As of July 31, 2011 the company does not have any outstanding common stock options or warrants.

Comprehensive Income

The Company has adopted SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. The Company has disclosed this information on its Statement of Operations. Comprehensive income is comprised of net income (loss) and all changes to capital deficit except those resulting from investments by owners and distribution to owners.

9

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Property Holding Costs

Holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. These costs include security and maintenance expenses, lease and claim fees payments, and environmental monitoring and reporting costs.

Exploration and Development Costs

Mineral property interests include optioned and acquired mineral development and exploration stage properties. The amount capitalized related to a mineral property interest represents its fair value at the time it was optioned or acquired, either as an individual asset or as a part of a business combination. The value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineralized material believed to be contained in such properties. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred and development costs are capitalized if proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially minable property. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new ore deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mineral interests costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

Income Taxes

The Company adopted FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, at its inception deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carryforwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the

years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current and

non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of July 31, 2011.

10

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The book values of cash, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels: 

•  Level one — inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•  Level two — inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and

•  Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

NOTE 2 – MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTY

LB/Vixen Property Acquisition

On May 1, 2011, the Company executed a property option agreement (the “Agreement”) with Nevada Mine Properties II, Inc. (“NMP”) granting the Company the right to acquire 100% of the mining interests of a Nevada mineral exploration property currently controlled by NMP, a natural resource exploration company.  The property known as the LB/Vixen Property is located in Humboldt County, Nevada and currently consists of 30 unpatented claims (the ‘Property”).  Annual option payments and minimum annual exploration expenditures under Agreement are as noted below:

		Property		Work
		Payments		Expenditures
Upon Execution of the Agreement	$	20,000	$	-
By May 1, 2012		20,000		200,000
By May 1, 2013		60,000		200,000
By May 1, 2014		45,000		200,000
By May 1, 2015		60,000		250,000
By May 1, 2016		70,000		250,000
By May 1, 2017		80,000		300,000
By May 1, 2018		90,000		300,000
By May 1, 2019		100,000		350,000
By May 1, 2020		100,000		400,000
By May 1, 2021		250,000		750,000
	$	895,000	$	3,200,000

11

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

(Formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.)

A Development Stage Company

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 – MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTY (Continued)

LB/Vixen Property Acquisition (Continued)

Upon execution of the Agreement, we paid NMP $20,000 and reimbursed them $7,065 in claim fees and property holding costs.  As a result of the LB/Vixen property not containing any known resources or reserves, the Company has written down its property option payment of $20,000 in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss at July 31, 2011.

Since our payment obligations are non-refundable, if we do not make any payments under the Agreement we will lose any payments made and all our rights to the Property. If all said payments under the Agreement are made, then we will acquire all mining interests in the Property.  If the Company fails to make any payment when due, the Agreement gives the Company a 60-day grace period to pay the amount of the deficiency.  NMP retained a 3% royalty of the aggregate proceeds received by the Company from any smelter or other purchaser of any ores, concentrates, metals or other material of commercial value produced from the Property, minus the cost of transportation of the ores, concentrates or metals, including related insurance, and smelting and refining charges, including penalties.

The Company shall have the one time right exercisable for 90 days following completion of a bankable feasibility study to buy up to two thirds (66.7%) of NMP’s royalty (i.e. an amount equal to 2% of the  royalty) for $3,000,000.

Both the Company and NMP have the right to assign, sell, mortgage or pledge their rights in each respective Agreement or on each respective Property. In addition, any mineral interests staked, located, granted or acquired by either the Company or NMP which are located within a 1 mile radius of the Property will be included in the option granted to the Company.  The Agreement will terminate if the Company fails to comply with any of its obligations in the Agreement and fails to cure such alleged breach. If the Company gives notice that it denies a default has occurred, the matter shall be determined finally through such means of dispute resolution as such matter has been subjected to by either party. The Agreement provides that all disputes shall be resolved by a sole arbitrator under the rules of the Arbitration Act of Nevada. The Company also has the right to terminate the Agreement by giving notice to NMP.

NOTE 3 – COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

On May 1, 2011 the Company closed a private placement of 3,500,000 common shares at $0.10 per share for a total offering price of $350,000.  The common shares were offered by the Registrant pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.   The private placement was fully subscribed to by five non-U.S. persons.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Commencing April 5, 2011, the Company began paying one of its directors $500 per month to serve on its Board of Directors.  The payments are made quarterly in advance.  The total amount paid to the Directors for the three-months ended July 31, 2011 was $1,500 (2010 - $0).

The Company also has a consulting agreement with its principal executive officer to provide a variety of services including planning and conducting its exploration programs, assisting with the identification and assessment of properties for potential acquisition or option by the Company, and for geological and administrative services provided to the Company.  The Company paid $7,324 for fees and reimbursement of expenses under this agreement for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 (2010 - $0).

12

Item 2.                      Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of Grizzly Gold Corp. (the “Company”), which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.  Certain statements contained in this report, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of the Company's business, the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company, its directors or its officers, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of the Company and the products it expects to offer and other statements contained herein regarding matters that are not historical facts, are "forward-looking" statements.  Future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, future press releases and future oral or written statements made by or with the approval of the Company, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain forward-looking statements. Because such statements include risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For a more detailed listing of some of the risks and uncertainties facing the Company, please see the Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011 filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.

General

We are a natural resource exploration company with an objective of acquiring, exploring, and if warranted and feasible, exploiting natural resource properties. Our primary focus in the natural resource sector is gold. We do not consider ourselves a “blank check” company required to comply with Rule 419 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, because we were not organized for the purpose of effecting, and our business plan is not to effect, a merger with or acquisition of an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person. We do not intend to merge with or acquire another company in the next 12 months.

Though we have the expertise on our board of directors to take a resource property that hosts a viable ore deposit into mining production, the costs and time frame for doing so are considerable, and the subsequent return on investment for our shareholders would be very long term indeed. We therefore anticipate optioning or selling any ore bodies that we may discover to a major mining company. Most major mining companies obtain their ore reserves through the purchase of ore bodies found by junior exploration companies. Although these major mining companies do some exploration work themselves, many of them rely on the junior resource exploration companies to provide them with future deposits for them to mine. By optioning or selling a deposit found by us to these major mining companies, it would provide an immediate return to our shareholders without the long time frame and cost of putting a mine into operation ourselves, and it would also provide future capital for the company to continue operations.

The search for valuable natural resources as a business is extremely risky. We can provide investors with no assurance that the property we have in Nevada contains commercially exploitable reserves.  Exploration for natural reserves is a speculative venture involving substantial risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing commercially feasible reserves. Problems such as unusual or unexpected geological formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. In such a case, we would be unable to complete our business plan and any money spent on exploration would be lost.

Natural resource exploration and development requires significant capital and our assets and resources are limited. Therefore, we anticipate participating in the natural resource industry through the purchase or option of early stage properties.   To date we have one property under option. We have not yet conducted any significant exploration on the property but we have initiated an exploration program that will include mapping, sampling, surveying and drilling on the property. There has been no indication as yet that any mineral deposits exist on the property, and there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our property. Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility is determined.

13

In the following discussion, there are references to “unpatented” mining claims. An unpatented mining claim on U.S. government lands establishes a claim to the locatable minerals (also referred to as stakeable minerals) on the land and the right of possession solely for mining purposes. No title to the land passes to the claimant. If a proven economic mineral deposit is developed, provisions of federal mining laws permit owners of unpatented mining claims to patent (to obtain title to) the claim. If you purchase an unpatented mining claim that is later declared invalid by the U.S. government, you could be evicted.

Plan of Operation

During the next twelve months our objective is to continue to explore the LB/Vixen property.  The funds in our treasury are sufficient to meet all planned activities as outlined below. The Company expects that it will need approximately $145,400 to fund its operations during the next twelve months which will include property option payments, exploration of its property as well as the costs associated with maintaining an office.  The Company completed a financing on May 1, 2011 for total proceeds of $350,000.  The cash from this financing is sufficient to fund its planned operations for the next twelve months.  However, in order to develop its property, the Company will need to obtain additional financing in the future.  Management plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offerings of its common stock.  Although there are no assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future.

We continue to run our operations with the use of contract operators, and as such do not anticipate a change to our company staffing levels. We remain focused on keeping the staff compliment, which currently consists of our sole executive officer, at a minimum to conserve capital. We believe outsourcing of necessary operations continues to be the most cost effective and efficient manner of conducting the business of the Company.

The following is an overview of the project work to date, as well as anticipated work for the next twelve months. Specific dates when work will begin, and how long it will take to complete each step is subject to change due to the variables of weather, availability of work crews for a particular type of work, and the results of work that is planned, the outcome of which will determine what the next step on that project will be.

LB/Vixen Property

On May 1, 2011, the Company executed a property option agreement (the “Agreement”) with NMP granting the Company the right to acquire 100% of the mining interests of a Nevada mineral exploration property currently controlled by NMP, a natural resource exploration company.  The property known as the LB/Vixen Property is located in Humboldt County, Nevada and currently consists of 30 unpatented claims (the ‘Property”).  Upon execution of the Agreement, we paid NMP $20,000 and reimbursed them $7,065 in claim fees and property holding costs.  As a result of the LB/Vixen property not containing any known resources, the Company has written down its property option payment of $20,000 in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss at July 31, 2011.

The Company’s Board of Directors has approved a budget for the Property for the next 12 months for total expenditures of $102,800.  The budget includes the following items:

	Amount ($)
Annual claim fees – 2011		10,000
Field work and permit preparation		72,800
Option payment – May 2012		20,000
		102,800

The budget for the balance of calendar 2011 and the first half of 2012 will include the preparation of permits for the planned work, road repair and construction, mapping, in-fill geology and geochemistry, and selection of drill targets.  The primary objective of the next twelve months is to have all necessary permits in place such that a drilling program can be undertaken in the summer of 2012.

14

The planned work will be overseen by the Company’s president who has visited the LB/Vixen Property several times, and will be undertaken largely by employees and contractors of NMP.  The Company anticipates submitting its plan of operations to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) by November 2011.  BLM is the government entity responsible for approving the drilling permit for the Company.

Results of Operations

We did not earn any revenues during the three-month periods ended July 31, 2011 or 2010.  We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time as we have entered into commercial production of our mineral property.  We are presently in the development stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our property, or if such resources are discovered, that we will enter into commercial production of our mineral property.

For the quarter ended July 31, 2011 we had a net loss of $66,192 compared to $1,162 for the comparable period ended July 31, 2010.  The increase in the net loss was largely due to 2011 costs associated with acquiring the LB/Vixen property, commencing the exploration program on the property and costs associated with being a fully-reporting SEC registrant.  The Company was only incorporated on April 21, 2010 resulting in minimal expenses being incurred for the period ended July 31, 2010.  As a result of a change in business to mineral exploration, the Company incurred $21,396 in mineral property exploration expenditures as it began its review and compilation of the LB/Vixen historical data.    As a result of the LB/Vixen property not containing any known resources, the Company has written down its property option payment of $20,000 in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss at July 31, 2011.

Liquidity and capital resources

We had working capital of $278,556 at July 31, 2011 consisting of cash of $283,397, prepaid expenses of $2,120 and total current liabilities of $6,961.

We anticipate that we will incur the following to July 31, 2012:

- $30,000 in connection with property option payments and claim fees under the Company’s LB/Vixen option agreement;

- $72,800 in property exploration expenses and claim payments in order to meet the requirements of the Company’s property option agreement;

-  $42,600 for operating expenses, including working capital and general, legal, accounting and administrative expenses associated with reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Cash used in operations was $47,227 for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 while it was $4,112for the quarter ended July 31, 2010.  The increase in cash used in operations was largely due to an increase in the net loss in 2011 to $66,192 from a net loss of $1,162 in 2010.   Cash flows from financing activities for 2011 were the result of $350,000 received from a private placement while in 2010 there were no financing activities.  Investing activities for the three-months ended July 31, 2011 were the result of the write-down of the initial $20,000 property option payment on the LB/Vixen property.   There were no investing activities for the three-months ended July 31, 2010.

The Company expects that it will need approximately $145,400 to fund its operations during the next twelve months which will include property option payments, exploration of its property as well as the costs associated with maintaining an office.  The Company completed a financing on May 1, 2011 for total proceeds of $350,000.  The cash received from this financing is sufficient to fund its planned operations for the next twelve months.  However, in order to develop its property in the future, the Company will need to obtain additional financing.  Management plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offerings of its common stock.  Although there are no assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management currently believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future.

15

Going Concern Consideration

Management believes that the gross proceeds from the private placement will be sufficient to continue our planned activities for the next twelve months. We anticipate generating losses and therefore we may be unable to continue operations in the future as a going concern. No adjustment has been made in the accompanying financial statements to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that could result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

We currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of July 31, 2011. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that the Company’s disclosure and controls are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company.  The Company’s property is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item 1A.

16

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On May 1, 2011 the Company closed a private placement of 3,500,000 common shares at $0.10 per share for a total offering price of $350,000.  The common shares were offered by the Registrant pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.   The private placement was fully subscribed to by five non-U.S. persons.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5. Other information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit 31 - Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32 – Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

17

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:   September 7, 2011

GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.

By:   /s/ Paul Strobel

       Paul Strobel

       President, Chief Executive

       Officer, and Treasurer

       (Principal Executive, Financial, and Accounting Officer)

18

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Strobel, certify that:

1.              I have reviewed the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2011;

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.              Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.               Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: September 7, 2011

/s/ Paul Strobel

----------------------

Paul Strobel, President,

Chief Executive Officer,

and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Paul Strobel, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Grizzly Gold Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.

Date: September 7, 2011

/s/ Paul Strobel

---------------------

Paul Strobel

President, Chief Executive Officer,

and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)

XML



BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jul. 31, 2011	Apr. 30, 2011
Common Stock, Par Value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Authorized shares	300,000,000	300,000,000
Shares issued	47,900,000	44,400,000

XML



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $)	3 Months Ended		15 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2010	Jul. 31, 2011
Revenues	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Cost of Revenues	0	0	0
Gross Margin	0	0	0
Expenses
Mineral Property Exploration Expenditures	21,396	0	24,620
General and Administrative	24,796	1,162	47,824
Net Loss from Operations	(46,192)	(1,162)	(72,444)
Other Income (Expense)
Interest	0	0	0
Net Other Income (Expense)	0	0	0
Write-down of Mineral Property Acquisition Payments	(20,000)	0	(20,000)
Net Loss	$ (66,192)	$ (1,162)	$ (92,444)
Basic and Diluted loss per Share	$ 0.00	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (1)	47,900,000	204,000,000

XML



Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011	Sep. 07, 2011
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jul. 31, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Entity Registrant Name	GRIZZLY GOLD CORP.
Entity Central Index Key	0001492541
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--04-30
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		47,900,000
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes

XML



- COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

3 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

- COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

NOTE 3 – COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

On May 1, 2011 the Company closed a private placement of 3,500,000 common shares at $0.10 per share for a total offering price of $350,000.  The common shares were offered by the Registrant pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.   The private placement was fully subscribed to by five non-U.S. persons.

XML



- ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

3 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

- ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of accounting policies for Grizzly Gold Corp. (formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on a going concern basis.

Organization

Grizzly Gold Corp. (formerly BCS Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) (the "Company")  was incorporated in the State of Florida on April 21, 2010.   The Company was formed to offer small and medium-sized businesses services that reduced invoicing expenses, sped up receipt of monies, and allowed authorization and recovery of paper drafts. The company intended to provide instant cash flow for small and medium-sized businesses and reduced expenses associated with invoicing with services that included pre-authorized checking, electronic payments, electronic check conversion, electronic check recovery, and telephone checks.

On March 14, 2011 the Board of Directors and majority shareholder of the Company approved a 17 for one forward stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock.  The forward stock split was distributed to all shareholders of record on March 25, 2011. No cash was paid or distributed as a result of the forward stock split and no fractional shares were issued. All fractional shares which would otherwise be required to be issued as a result of the stock split were rounded up to the nearest whole share. There was no change in the par value of our common stock.  All references to share and per share amounts have been restated in these financial statements to reflect the split.

On April 5, 2011, the Company’s majority shareholder returned 180,000,000 common shares to the Company for cancellation.  The shares were returned for cancellation in order to reduce the number of shares issued and outstanding.  Subsequent to the cancellation, the Company had 44,400,000 shares issued and outstanding which was a number that the majority shareholder who was also at that time a director of the Company, considered more in line with the Company’s business plans.  Following the share cancellation, the majority shareholder owned 24,000,000 common shares, or 54.05%, of the remaining 44,400,000 issued and outstanding common shares of the Company at that time.

Also on April 5, 2011, the principal shareholder of the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement which provided for the sale of his remaining 24,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company to Jeoffrey Avancena. In connection with the share acquisition, Mr. Avancena was appointed Secretary and Director of the Company and the Board of Directors of the Company elected Mr. Paul Strobel as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and a director of the Company.

On July 8, 2011 our Board of Directors, and on July 5, 2011 our shareholders, approved the change of our name from BCS Solutions, Inc. to Grizzly Gold Corp. Also on July 5, 2011, the shareholders approved a proposal to change the Company’s state of incorporation from Florida to Nevada by the merger of BCS Solutions, Inc. with and into its wholly-owned subsidiary, Grizzly Gold Corp., a Nevada corporation. The change of name and jurisdiction became effective on August 1, 2011.

Nature of Operations

The Company is in the development stage and has no products or services as of July 31, 2011.  We are currently a development stage company as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and we are in the business of exploring and if warranted, advancing certain unpatented Nevada mineral claims to the discovery point where we believe maximum shareholder returns can be realized.

Interim Reporting

The unaudited financial information furnished herein reflects all adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state the financial position of Grizzly Gold Corp. and the results of its operations for the periods presented.  This report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.  The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context.  Accordingly, footnote disclosure, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 has been omitted.  The results of operations for the three-month period ended July 31, 2011 is not necessary indicative of results for the entire year ending April 30, 2012.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $92,444 for the period from April 21, 2010 (inception) to July 31, 2011, and has no sales.  The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its mineral property.  The Company expects that it will need approximately $145,400 to fund its operations during the next twelve months which will include property option payments, exploration of its property as well as the costs associated with maintaining an office.  The Company completed a financing on May 1, 2011 for total proceeds of $350,000.  The cash received from this financing is sufficient to fund its planned operations for the next twelve months.  However, in order to develop its property in the future, the Company will need to obtain additional financing.  Management plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offerings of its common stock.  Although there are no assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management currently believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future.

If the Company were unable to continue as a “going concern”, then substantial adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of assets, the reported amounts of its liabilities, the reported expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Management’s Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and notes. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates relate to the write-down of mineral property acquisition costs and accrued liabilities.  Management believes the estimates utilized in preparing these financial statements are reasonable and prudent and are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the financial statements for the period ended July 31, 2010 to conform to accounting and financial statement presentation for the period ended July 31, 2011.

Foreign Currency

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar and to date has undertaken the majority of its transactions in U.S. dollars. Any transaction gains and losses that may take place will be included in the statement of operations as they occur.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company has no off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company maintains all of its cash balances with one financial institution in the form of a demand deposit.

Loss per Share

Net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. As of July 31, 2011 the company does not have any outstanding common stock options or warrants.

Comprehensive Income

The Company has adopted SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. The Company has disclosed this information on its Statement of Operations. Comprehensive income is comprised of net income (loss) and all changes to capital deficit except those resulting from investments by owners and distribution to owners.

Property Holding Costs

Holding costs to maintain a property on a care and maintenance basis are expensed in the period they are incurred. These costs include security and maintenance expenses, lease and claim fees payments, and environmental monitoring and reporting costs.

Exploration and Development Costs

Mineral property interests include optioned and acquired mineral development and exploration stage properties. The amount capitalized related to a mineral property interest represents its fair value at the time it was optioned or acquired, either as an individual asset or as a part of a business combination. The value of such assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineralized material believed to be contained in such properties. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred and development costs are capitalized if proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially minable property. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new ore deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, the carrying value of capitalized mineral interests costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

Income Taxes

The Company adopted FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, at its inception deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carryforwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the

years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current and

non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of July 31, 2011.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The book values of cash, prepaid expenses, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels: 

•Level one — inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•Level two — inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and

•Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

XML



- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

3 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Commencing April 5, 2011, the Company began paying one of its directors $500 per month to serve on its Board of Directors.  The payments are made quarterly in advance.  The total amount paid to the Directors for the three-months ended July 31, 2011 was $1,500 (2010 - $0). 

The Company also has a consulting agreement with its principal executive officer to provide a variety of services including planning and conducting its exploration programs, assisting with the identification and assessment of properties for potential acquisition or option by the Company, and for geological and administrative services provided to the Company.  The Company paid $7,324 for fees and reimbursement of expenses under this agreement for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 (2010 - $0).

XML



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	3 Months Ended		15 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2010	Jul. 31, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss	$ (66,192)	$ (1,162)	$ (92,444)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
Write-down of Mineral Property Acquisition Costs	20,000	0	20,000
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid Expenses	(2,120)	0	(2,120)
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	1,085	(2,950)	6,961
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(47,227)	(4,112)	(67,603)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Mineral Property Acquisition Costs	(20,000)	0	(20,000)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(20,000)	0	(20,000)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from Sale of Common Stock	350,000	0	371,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	350,000	0	371,000
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	282,773	(4,112)	283,397
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	624	8,992	0
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	283,397	4,880	283,397
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest	0	0	0
Income taxes	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML



- MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTY

3 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

- MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTY

NOTE 2 – MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTY

LB/Vixen Property Acquisition

On May 1, 2011, the Company executed a property option agreement (the “Agreement”) with Nevada Mine Properties II, Inc. (“NMP”) granting the Company the right to acquire 100% of the mining interests of a Nevada mineral exploration property currently controlled by NMP, a natural resource exploration company.  The property known as the LB/Vixen Property is located in Humboldt County, Nevada and currently consists of 30 unpatented claims (the ‘Property”).  Annual option payments and minimum annual exploration expenditures under Agreement are as noted below:

		Property		Work
		Payments		Expenditures
Upon Execution of the Agreement	$	20,000	$	-
By May 1, 2012		20,000		200,000
By May 1, 2013		60,000		200,000
By May 1, 2014		45,000		200,000
By May 1, 2015		60,000		250,000
By May 1, 2016		70,000		250,000
By May 1, 2017		80,000		300,000
By May 1, 2018		90,000		300,000
By May 1, 2019		100,000		350,000
By May 1, 2020		100,000		400,000
By May 1, 2021		250,000		750,000
	$	895,000	$	3,200,000

LB/Vixen Property Acquisition (Continued)

Upon execution of the Agreement, we paid NMP $20,000 and reimbursed them $7,065 in claim fees and property holding costs.  As a result of the LB/Vixen property not containing any known resources or reserves, the Company has written down its property option payment of $20,000 in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss at July 31, 2011.

Since our payment obligations are non-refundable, if we do not make any payments under the Agreement we will lose any payments made and all our rights to the Property. If all said payments under the Agreement are made, then we will acquire all mining interests in the Property.  If the Company fails to make any payment when due, the Agreement gives the Company a 60-day grace period to pay the amount of the deficiency.  NMP retained a 3% royalty of the aggregate proceeds received by the Company from any smelter or other purchaser of any ores, concentrates, metals or other material of commercial value produced from the Property, minus the cost of transportation of the ores, concentrates or metals, including related insurance, and smelting and refining charges, including penalties. 

The Company shall have the one time right exercisable for 90 days following completion of a bankable feasibility study to buy up to two thirds (66.7%) of NMP’s royalty (i.e. an amount equal to 2% of the  royalty) for $3,000,000.

Both the Company and NMP have the right to assign, sell, mortgage or pledge their rights in each respective Agreement or on each respective Property. In addition, any mineral interests staked, located, granted or acquired by either the Company or NMP which are located within a 1 mile radius of the Property will be included in the option granted to the Company.  The Agreement will terminate if the Company fails to comply with any of its obligations in the Agreement and fails to cure such alleged breach. If the Company gives notice that it denies a default has occurred, the matter shall be determined finally through such means of dispute resolution as such matter has been subjected to by either party. The Agreement provides that all disputes shall be resolved by a sole arbitrator under the rules of the Arbitration Act of Nevada. The Company also has the right to terminate the Agreement by giving notice to NMP.

XML



BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (USD $)	Jul. 31, 2011	Apr. 30, 2011
Current Assets
Cash	$ 283,397	$ 624
Prepaid Expenses	2,120	0
Total Current Assets	285,517	624
Total Assets	285,517	624
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	6,961	5,876
Total Current Liabilities	6,961	5,876
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock, Par Value $.0001 Authorized 300,000,000 shares, 47,900,000 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2011 (April 30, 2011 - 44,400,000)	4,790	4,440
Additional Paid-In Capital	366,210	16,560
Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage	(92,444)	(26,252)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	278,556	(5,252)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$ 285,517	$ 624