EX-99.2 3 ex992.htm ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM FOR THE FIFTEEN MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 ex992.htm
Exhibit 99.2
 
 
LOGO

 
 
 

 
ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
 
For the fifteen months ended September 30, 2010
 
 


November 24, 2010






 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

CORPORATE STRUCTURE
4
    NAME, ADDRESS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
4
    INTERCORPORATE AND INTRACORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS
4
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
5
    THREE YEAR HISTORY
5
    ACQUISITIONS
5
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
5
    GENERAL
5
    OPERATIONS
6
    CORPORATE OFFICE
8
    RISK FACTORS
8
DIVIDENDS
12
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
12
    GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
12
MARKET FOR SECURITIES
13
TRADING PRICE AND VOLUME
13
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
14
    CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS
15
    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
16
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
17
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
18
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS
18
EXPERTS
18
AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION
18
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
19
APPENDIX “A” – AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
20


 

 

 

 

 

 

 
- 2 -

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 
This Annual Information Form (“AIF”) refers to certain financial measures that are not determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in Canada.  These measures do not have standardized meanings and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.  Although measures such as “Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Extraordinary Items, Stock-based Compensation, Amortization of Capital and Intangible Assets” (“EBITA”) do not have standardized meanings prescribed by GAAP, these measures are used herein or can be determined by reference to our financial statements.  “Same branch revenues” is a non-GAAP measure tracked and reported by us and is generally used to compare the average revenue for a particular group of branches in a current period to that same particular group of branches in a prior period. This non-GAAP measure is a way to gauge the performance of a particular group of branches and is directly related to, and helps explain, changes in total revenue.  Average revenue is defined as revenue for the period divided by the number branches. “Branch operating income” (“BOI”) is a non-GAAP measure tracked and reported by us and is generally used to compare performance at the branch level. It includes expenses which primarily relate to the operations of the branch network.  “Regional expenses” is a non-GAAP measure which is used to gauge expenditures at the regional and divisional level and includes compensation of associates including centralized regional departments, Regional Managers, Divisional Vice Presidents and President, as well as other expenses related to the functions of these groups. “Corporate expenses” is a non-GAAP measure which is used to gauge expenditures at the corporate level and includes compensation of associates and related expenses at the corporate office level. These measures are discussed because management believes that they facilitate the understanding of The Cash Store Financial Services Inc.’s results and of its operational and financial position.
 
Readers are cautioned that non-GAAP measures used herein are not alternatives to measures under GAAP and should not, on their own, be construed as indicators of the Company’s performance or cash flows, measures of liquidity or as measures of actual return on the Company’s common shares. These non-GAAP measures, as presented, should only be used in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company. See “Risk Factors”.

 
Reporting Currency
 
All dollar amounts are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.  The Company’s quarterly and annual financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars and are reported in accordance with the Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

 
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-looking Information
 
This AIF contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, information with respect to our objectives, strategies, operations and financial results, competition as well initiatives to grow revenue or reduce retention payments. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “does not anticipate”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases. Forward-looking information contains statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, or “will be taken”, “occur”, or “be achieved”. Known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company, to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. These risks include, but are not limited to, changes in economic and political conditions, legislative or regulatory developments, technological developments, third-party arrangements, competition, litigation, risks associated with, but not limited to, market conditions, the availability of alternative transactions, shareholder, legal, regulatory and court approvals and third-party consents, and other factors described elsewhere herein and in other documents of the Company filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.  Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.


 
- 3 -

 

CORPORATE STRUCTURE
 
Name, Address and Background Information
 
The Cash Store Financial Services Inc. (“Cash Store Financial” or the “Company”), operates in the business of brokering short-term advances, providing short-term advances and related services through its subsidiaries.  In this AIF, references to Cash Store Financial or the Company include its subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise.
 
The Company was incorporated on February 23, 2001, under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (the “OBCA”), as B&B Capital Corporation. On August 1, 2001, B&B Capital Corporation changed its name to “Rentcash Inc.” and subsequently amalgamated with Larkfield Capital Corp. (“Larkfield”), under the OBCA, effective January 17, 2002 (the “Amalgamation”), with the amalgamated company continuing as Rentcash Inc. Larkfield was incorporated under the Company Act (British Columbia) on May 15, 2000, under the name Willow Creek Capital Corp. (“Willow Creek”).  The name of Willow Creek was changed to “Larkfield Capital Corp.” on August 24, 2000, and Larkfield was subsequently continued into Ontario under the OBCA, effective January 15, 2002.
 
Pursuant to the Amalgamation, each common share of Rentcash was exchanged for one common share of the Company, and each three common shares of Larkfield were exchanged for one common share of the Company.
 
The Company changed its name on March 31, 2008, from Rentcash Inc. to “The Cash Store Financial Services Inc.” in connection with the “spin off”.  Cash Store Financial’s common shares (the “Common Shares”) are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) under the symbol “CSF”, formerly “RCS”.  On June 8, 2010, the Company began trading its shares on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “CSFS”.
 
On March 31, 2008, (pursuant to a Plan of Arrangement (the “spin off”)) the Company separated its rental business and certain of its assets and liabilities into an independent, publicly-traded company. Each existing shareholder of The Cash Store Financial Services Inc. received one common share of Insta-Rent for each Common Share held on March 31, 2008.
 
On April 28, 2010, our board of directors approved a change in our fiscal year end from June 30 to September 30.  The fiscal year end change has resulted in a fifteen month reporting period from July 1, 2009, to September 30, 2010.
 
The registered office of the Company is located at Scotia Plaza, Suite 2100, and 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 3C2. The head office of the Company is located at 17631-103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5S 1N8.
 
Intercorporate and Intracorporate Relationships
 
Cash Store Financial’s principal direct and indirect subsidiaries are as set forth in the following chart.  The Company owns 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of each principal subsidiary.  The Cash Store Inc., in turn, owns 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Instaloans Inc.; and The Cash Store Financial Limited owns 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of The Cash Store Limited and CSF Insurance Services Limited.  Included in parenthesis within the corporate organization chart is the respective province or country of incorporation of each entity:
 
GRAPHIC
 

 

 
- 4 -

 

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
 
Three Year History
 
Cash Store Financial is the only broker of short‐term advances and provider of other financial services in Canada. The Company operates in Canada and the United Kingdom. The Company’s overall operating strategy is to fulfil the needs of a large segment of the population that are not being met by traditional financial institutions.
 
The Company’s number of branches in operation has grown to 544 as at September 30, 2010, which compares to 358 as at July 1, 2007. The strategic approach has been to grow rapidly and secure a dominant market footprint, and to then build revenues, followed by infrastructure enhancements and product diversification.  The Company’s associates at branch level, along with regional managers, have grown from a staff of 1,500 in fiscal 2008 to a staff of over 2,000 by the end of fiscal 2010.
 
To support the growth of our branches, the Company’s corporate office has grown from a staff of 100 in fiscal 2008 to a staff of over 155 by fiscal 2010.  The increase reflects management’s approach of adding infrastructure for future growth, and the strengthening of management and staff in key areas including operations, business development and in our national collection center.
 
Acquisitions
 
On September 1, 2009, the Company acquired all the business assets of Affordable Payday Loans Inc. representing eight branches in Ontario and two branches in Alberta for total cash consideration of $800,000. Affordable Payday Loans Inc. operated in the short-term advances industry.

On April 26, 2010, the Company acquired all the business assets of 101019134 Saskatchewan Ltd. (“EZ Cash”), representing 14 branches in Saskatchewan, for total cash consideration of $4.5 million. EZ Cash operated in the short-term advances industry.
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
 
General
 
Cash Store Financial operates under two branch banners, The Cash Store and Instaloans, which act as brokers to facilitate short‐term advances and provide other financial services
 
As at September 30, 2010, Cash Store Financial operated 544 (June 30, 2009 - 424) short-term advance branches across Canada and the United Kingdom (“UK”). The Company employed over 2,000 associates across Canada and in the UK. The branch count by location for the fifteen month period ended September 30, 2010, was as follows:
 
Canada
Branches
British Columbia
104
Alberta
130
Saskatchewan
35
Manitoba
32
Ontario
187
New Brunswick
12
Nova Scotia
22
Prince Edward Island
4
Newfoundland and Labrador
13
Northwest Territories
2
Yukon
1
 
542
United Kingdom
2
Total
544


 
- 5 -

 



 
Operations
 
Summary
 
For the fifteen month fiscal period ended September 30, 2010, the Company’s operations generated revenues of $221.8 million, compared to $150.5 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009.
 
The Company, under its The Cash Store and Instaloans banners, provides consumers with short-term cash advances without having to provide a credit history or security on the loan by acting as a broker between the customer and third-party lenders or directly lending to the customer. In terms of process for a brokered loan, after an application is completed and other relevant information is obtained from a customer, the Company brokers the customer’s loan request to third-party lenders. Based on approval criteria established by the third-party lenders, the customers’ eligibility for an advance is assessed. If the customer is approved, the Company provides the lender’s loan documentation to the customer. Upon fulfillment of the loan documentation requirements, the Company is authorized by the lender to forward the cash advance to the customer on behalf of the lender. When an advance becomes due and payable, the customer must make repayment of the principal and interest owing to the lender through the Company, which, in turn, remits the funds to the third-party lender. If there is difficulty with the collection process, the customer’s account may be turned over to an independent collection agency.
 
In Q5 of fiscal 2010, the Company started providing loans to customers directly. When lending directly to a customer, the process is similar to the above except that the lending criteria are established internally and loan approvals are completed internally.
 
The Company typically arranges for advances to customers ranging from $100 to $1,500. In order to receive an advance, a consumer is required to provide proof of income, copies of recent bank statements, current proof of residence, and current telephone and utility bills.  The customer must then either write a cheque or execute a pre-authorized debit agreement for the amount of the advance plus the third-party lender’s pre-calculated interest. Deposit of the cheque is deferred until the due date of the loan, which is the consumer’s next payday (normally seven to 14 days but no later than 31 days). The cheque is not post-dated. When the agreement expires, the cheque may be deposited to repay the advance, or the consumer may redeem the cheque by paying cash in the amount of the cheque.
 
Customers have the option to receive their advance through a cheque from the third-party lender, or they may have the funds loaded on a private labelled debit card or a prepaid credit card, both of which are offered by the Company through an arrangement with a third-party service provider. This arrangement allows the branches to load cash advances and other amounts onto a debit or credit card. The customer can then immediately use the debit or credit card at any ABM or point of sale terminal in Canada where traditional debit or credit cards are accepted.
 
As at September 30, 2010, the Company operated 544 branches which are located primarily in strip malls within high traffic areas. Branches are open seven days a week, where permitted by law, with operating hours from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays, and 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Sundays. Typically, the branches range in size from 500 to 1,500 square feet.
 
There is some seasonality in the Company’s business.  Historical results lead the Company to believe that its revenues are generally stronger in the quarter ended June 30 and September 30 followed by the quarters ended December 31 and March 31.
 
Competition
 
Competition for the Company exists in the short-term advance market with the Company having a market share of approximately 34% by branches. There are approximately 1,600 short-term advance branches across Canada. The Company’s biggest competitor is Dollar Financial Corp. (“Dollar Financial”), a U.S.-based public company. Dollar Financial operates approximately 465 branches in Canada under the banner “Money Mart”. This includes 37 branches in Quebec which do not provide short-term advances. “Cash Money” is the next largest operator in Canada with 112 branches. The rest of the market consists of small, single store operations and regional operations that may have a number of short-term advance branches in a given region. Competition also comes from companies, such as cheque cashers, pawnshops, rental stores and others, that offer the short-term advance service as an ancillary service. Several companies also provide short-term advances via the Internet.
 
The regulatory environment in Canada is stabilizing due to the recent passing of regulations by most provinces. The Company will likely face increased competition from both U.S. and Canadian based companies as a result. The largest short-term advance lender in the U.S., “Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.”, has already entered the Canadian market. In addition, a large US company, EZCorp Inc., moved into the Canadian market during the year.  EZCorp Inc. operates 51 branches in Canada under the banner “Cash-Max”.
 

 
- 6 -

 

Additional information on U.S. companies operating in the short-term advance business is included in the table below. This information is provided for reference only. It is based on publicly available information as at the date hereof and is not intended to be exhaustive.
Company Name
Approximate Market Cap. as of September 30, 2010
Estimated number of locations as at September 30, 2010
Rank by loan revenue
Stock Symbol and Stock Exchange
Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.
US $251 million
2,360
1
AEA (NYSE)
Dollar Financial Corp
US $509 million
1,193 (franchise locations included)
2
DLLR (Nasdaq)
Ace Cash Express, Inc.
N/A
1,754 (May 6, 2010)
3
N/A – private
QC Holdings Inc.
US $67 million
550
4
QCCO (Nasdaq)
EZCorp Inc.
US $927 million
1,000
5
EZPW (Nasdaq)

 
New Products
 
During the fifteen month period, bank accounts were introduced nationally by the Company across the branch network in February 2010. Accounts are Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) insurable and are offered through an agency agreement with a third-party bank which is a federally regulated Schedule I bank.
 
Suppliers and Contractual Business Arrangements
 
The Company does not fund all of its short-term advances made to its customers. The majority of short-term advances made to the Company’s customers are provided by independent third-party lenders. The short-term advances made to the Company’s customers are repayable solely to the third-party lenders and are assets of the third-party lenders; accordingly, they are not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. To facilitate the short-term advance business, the Company has entered into written agreements with a number of third-party lenders that are prepared to consider lending to customers. The Company believes that its current arrangements with third-party lenders are satisfactory to meet near-term future requirements, and that it will be able to successfully source additional funds from either existing third-party lenders or from new third-party lenders in order to meet the longer-term requirements of the Company’s customers. The absence of third-party lenders willing to lend to customers could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business.
 
The Company has a contractual arrangement with a third-party provider of bank accounts, debit card, prepaid credit card, point-of-sale and other electronic payment services. The Company is dependent on this supplier as a majority of the advances provided to customers by the third-party lenders are completed through the debit card and prepaid credit card services offered by this supplier.  While there are a number of suppliers of these services, any adverse condition experienced by the existing supplier could have a material adverse impact on the operations of the Company.
 
Associates
 
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had over 2,000 full-time and part-time associates.
 
Foreign Operations
 
The Company opened two branches in the United Kingdom during the fifteen month fiscal period ended September 30, 2010.
 
The Company has an investment in The Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc. that currently operates 63 branches in Australia under the name “The Cash Store Pty.” which is a subsidiary of The Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc. The Company owns approximately 18.3% of the outstanding common shares of The Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc.
 
The Company also has an investment in RTF Financial Holdings Inc. that is in the business of short-term lending, by utilizing highly automated mobile technology (SMS text message lending).  RTF Financial Holdings Inc. currently operates in Finland, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands and the UK with plans to expand to other European countries.  The Company owns approximately 15.7% of the outstanding common shares of RTF Financial Holdings Inc.
 

 
- 7 -

 


 
Corporate Office
 
The Company’s corporate office performs corporate, compliance, management and administrative functions. The corporate office is a management group that oversees the operations of all subsidiaries in conjunction with the Company’s responsibilities as a public company. As of September 30, 2010, the corporate office had approximately 155 full-time and part-time associates.
 
Risk Factors
 
The Company’s business is subject to risks and uncertainties that could result in material adverse effects on the Company’s business and financial results. Risks and uncertainties specific to each of the operating segments are outlined below.
 
Regulatory Environment
 
The Company’s operations are subject to various federal and provincial laws and regulations. The laws and regulations are subject to change which could impose significant costs or limitations on the way the Company conducts or expands its business.
 
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada introduced Bill C-26, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal interest rate), in the House of Commons on October 6, 2006. This enactment amends the Code by exempting persons from the application of section 347 of the Code in respect of agreement for small, short-term loans (Payday Loans). The Bill received Royal Assent on May 3, 2007.  Bill C-26 is designed to exempt Payday Loans from criminal sanctions in order to facilitate provincial regulation of the Payday Loan industry.
 
Section 347 of the Code makes it an offence to enter into an agreement or arrangement to receive, or to actually receive, “interest” on credit in excess of 60 per cent per annum of the total value of the credit advanced.  Payday lending and a variety of other short-term financing arrangements were inadvertently caught under this legislative scheme for exceeding the criminal interest rate.  Bill C-26 was enacted to rectify this discrepancy. Bill C-26 introduced section 347.1 of the Code, which retains the definition of “interest” found in section 347. The new section also defines a “Payday Loan” as, “an advancement of money in exchange for a post-dated cheque, a preauthorized debit or a future payment of a similar nature but not for any guarantee, suretyship, overdraft protection or security on property and not through a margin loan, pawn broking, a line of credit or a credit card.” Section 347.1 further provides that the federal government will exempt a payday lender from criminal interest rate provisions if:
 
 
a)
the loan is for $1,500 or less and the term of the agreement is for 62 days or less;
 
 
b)
the lender is licensed or otherwise specifically authorized under the laws of a province to enter into the loan agreement; and
 
 
c)
the province is designated by the federal government.
 
In order for a province to be designated by the Governor in Council, the province must:
 
 
a)
request, through its Lieutenant Governor in Council, the federal designation;
 
 
b)
enact legislative measures that protect recipients of Payday Loans; and
 
 
c)
provide for limits on the total cost of borrowing under Payday Loan agreements.
 
Essentially, the exemption applies to Payday Loan companies licensed by any province that has legislative measures in place designed to protect consumers and to limit the overall cost of loans.
 
Cash Store Financial has indicated its support of the amendments to section 347 of the Code as well as provincial industry regulation. The Company is, and has been, in compliance with section 347 of the Code, a position maintained throughout the three class proceedings in which it has been involved.
 
The settlement of class proceedings in British Columbia and Ontario did not require any substantive changes to the Company’s operating model.
 
Many provinces are currently working through a process to establish consumer protection measures for the payday loan industry.  These measures will include rate caps and a ban on rollovers. The Company expects regulation to be positive for its operations and anticipates that it will be able to accommodate its business model to anticipated rate caps.  In addition, the Company’s voluntary implementation of a prohibition on the provision of rollovers has given it a competitive advantage over those companies that have not done so in advance of the now regulated prohibition on these practices.
 

 
- 8 -

 

It should be noted that the provincial legislation does not apply to or affect federally regulated banks.  A number of the services offered at Cash Store and Instaloans locations are provided by an independent third party bank, and are not subject to provincial regulation.
 
The following rate caps are currently in effect:  Nova Scotia - $31 per hundred dollars loaned; British Columbia - $23 per hundred dollars loaned; Ontario - $21 per hundred dollars loaned; Manitoba - $17 per hundred dollars loaned; and Alberta - $23 per hundred dollars loaned.  Newfoundland has announced that it does not intend to enact local legislation.  While at this stage it remains difficult to specify expected rates for the remaining provinces, all Canadian jurisdictions appear committed to facilitating a competitive industry.
 
There is a risk given that the Payday Loan industry is subject to various federal and provincial laws and regulations and that the laws and regulations are subject to change and could impose unforeseen costs or limitations on the industry.
 
There continues to be significant litigation and regulatory proceedings against payday advance businesses in the U.S. These proceedings have caused Payday Loan companies to suspend or permanently cease operations in certain states. Class action litigation proceedings are underway against most of the significant payday advance businesses in Canada, including the Company.  See “Legal Proceedings”.
 
Third-party Lenders/Retention Payments
 
The Company does not fund all of the short-term advances; the majority of funding is provided by independent third-party lenders. As a result, the Company’s business is highly dependent on third-party lenders that are willing to make significant funds available for lending to the Company’s customers. There are no assurances that the existing, or new, third-party lenders will continue to make funds available to the Company’s customers. Any reduction or withdrawal of funds could have a significant adverse material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
 
To facilitate the short-term advance business, the Company has entered into written agreements with a number of third-party lenders that are prepared to consider lending to the Company’s customers. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company provides services to the lenders related to the collection of documents and information as well as loan collection services. The agreements also provide that the third-party lenders are responsible for losses suffered on account of uncollectible loans provided the Company has properly performed its duties under the terms of the agreements.  In the event the duties are not properly performed, and the lenders make a claim as required under the agreement, the Company’s operations may be liable to the lenders for losses they have incurred. The contingent risk is the balance of the third-party lenders’ loan portfolio which totalled approximately $109 million as at September 30, 2010 (June 30, 2009 - $79 million).
 
While no claims have been made by the third-party lenders to date, pursuant to these agreements between the parties and the third-party lenders, there have not been any guaranteed returns. The Company has made the decision to voluntarily make retention payments to the lenders to lessen the impact of the loan losses experienced by the third-party lenders. The retention payments are made pursuant to a resolution approved by the Company’s board of directors which authorizes management to pay a maximum amount of retention payments per quarter to third-party lenders as consideration to those lenders that continue to be willing to fund advances to the Company’s customers.
 
Class Action Lawsuits and General Litigation
 
The Company’s businesses are subject to lawsuits and regulatory proceedings that could generate adverse publicity and cause the Company to incur substantial legal expenditures. Class action litigation proceedings are underway against most of the significant short-term advance businesses in Canada, including proceedings against the Company in Alberta and Manitoba.  See “Legal Proceedings”.  Failure by the Company to successfully defend itself in any of the currently filed class action lawsuits, or future actions, could have an adverse material effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
 
Corporate Relationships
 
The Company is highly dependent on a number of corporate relationships, and the loss of one of the key relationships could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations. Further, the Company cannot be certain it will be able to enter into new relationships on terms as favourable as its current relationships if these relationships and/or agreements were terminated or not renewed.
 

 
- 9 -

 

As noted above, the Company is highly dependent on third-party lenders and the loss of a material relationship could have an immediate adverse impact on the Company’s business. The Company’s operations are also dependent on a third-party provider of debit card, prepaid credit card, consumer bank accounts, point-of-sale and other electronic payment services, as a majority of the advances provided to customers by the third-party lenders are completed through the debit card and prepaid credit card services offered by this supplier.  While there are a number of suppliers of these services, any adverse condition experienced by the existing supplier could have a material impact on the operations of the Company’s business.
 
Current and Future Competition
 
The Company is subject to both significant and varied competitive risk. The competitive environment within which the Company operates is somewhat fragmented but could consolidate if large U.S.-based companies decide to directly increase their involvement in Canada.  There are few barriers to entry, other than capital, once the regulations have been fully implemented.
 
In the short-term advance market, the Company’s largest competitor is Dollar Financial Corp., a U.S.-based public company. Dollar Financial operates approximately 465 branches in Canada under the banner “Money Mart”. This includes 37 branches in Quebec which do not provide short-term advance. “Cash Money” is the next largest operator in Canada with 112 branches. The rest of the market consists of small, single branch operations and regional operations that may have a number of short-term advance branches in a given region. Competition also comes from companies, such as cheque cashers, pawnshops, rental stores and others, that offer the short-term advance service as an ancillary service. Several companies also provide short-term advances via the Internet. Some of Cash Store Financial’s competitors may have larger local or regional customer bases, more locations, and larger financial, marketing and other resources than the Company.
 
There are indications that new market entries have opened locations given the stabilization in provincial regulations.  For example, the largest short-term lender in the U.S., “Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc.” has opened several locations within Canada on a test basis. They have indicated that they will be opening additional branches during the year once the provincial regulatory environment has stabilized.  Advance America currently operates 2,360 retail outlets in 31 U.S. jurisdictions. In addition, a large US company, EZCorp Inc., moved into the Canadian market during the year.  EZCorp Inc. operates 51 branches in Canada under the banner “Cash-Max”.  As a result of increasing competition, the Company could lose market share, possibly resulting in a decline in future revenues and earnings.
 
Influence by Significant Shareholder
 
Mr. Gordon J. Reykdal, Cash Store Financial’s founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or had control or direction over, approximately 21.0% of the Company’s common shares outstanding as at September 30, 2010. Accordingly, Mr. Reykdal may be able to exercise significant influence over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions.
 
Key Associates
 
The success of the Company is dependent on the efforts, skills and performance of a limited number of key individuals, in particular, Mr. Gordon J. Reykdal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as other members of senior management and key associates.  The loss of their services for any reason could have a material adverse impact on the Company.  There is competition for such personnel and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel as it may require. Failure to attract and retain key associates with the necessary skills could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
 
Possible Volatility of Share Price
 
The market price of the Company’s common shares has been, and may be, subject to significant fluctuation in response to numerous factors, including variations in the annual or quarterly financial results of the Company, timing of announcements of acquisitions by the Company or its competitors, conditions in the economy in general or in the Company’s respective industries in particular, changes in applicable laws and regulations, and other factors. Moreover, from time to time stock markets experience significant price and volume volatility that may affect the market price of the common shares for reasons unrelated to the Company’s performance. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of common shares or the availability of shares for future sale (including shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options) will have on the market price of the common shares prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing price of the Company’s common shares.
 

 
- 10 -

 

Size and Expansion
 
The Company has undergone rapid expansion and growth since its inception. There is no guarantee that current or future revenue and earnings from this expansion and growth will be sufficient to maintain current valuations.
 
Cash Store Financial’s business strategy depends on the ability to compete for suitable locations, to adapt infrastructure and systems to accommodate growth, and to obtain adequate financing for expansion plans in order to ensure continued product diversification. The start-up costs and the losses from initial operations attributable to each newly opened location place additional demands upon liquidity and cash flow.
 
In addition, Cash Store Financial’s ability to execute its growth, product diversification and infrastructure enhancement strategies will depend on a number of other factors, some of which may be beyond its control, including:
 
 
the prevailing laws and regulatory environment of each province or jurisdiction in which it operates, which are subject to change at any time;
 
 
its ability to obtain and maintain any regulatory approvals, government permits or licenses that may be required;
 
 
the degree of competition in new markets and its effect on the Company’s ability to attract new customers;
 
 
the ability to compete for expansion opportunities in suitable locations;
 
 
the ability to recruit, train and retain qualified personnel; and
 
 
the ability of the Company’s systems, procedures, controls and existing space to continue to support the expansion of its operations.
 
Current branch levels and future expansion, if any, may further strain the Company’s management, financial and other resources. Cash Store Financial’s future results of operations will substantially depend on the ability of its officers and key associates to manage changing business conditions and regulatory environments and to implement and improve its technical, administrative, and financial control and reporting systems.
 
New Branch Start-Up Costs
 
The Company opened 104 new branches, acquired 22 branches and closed six branches in the fifteen months ended September 30, 2010.  The Company anticipates opening 70 to 80 new branches over the next year. Opening or acquiring new branches can involve significant start-up costs. Additionally, new branches may not reach profitability in their first year, or ever.  As a result, opening a number of new branches over a short period of time may materially decrease the Company’s net income for a time period. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company will fully recover these start-up costs.
 
Media Scrutiny
 
Media reports and public perception of short-term cash advances as being predatory or abusive could decrease demand for short-term advances, subject the Company to increased regulatory scrutiny and legal proceedings, and reduce the Company’s access to sources of financing.
 
Corporate Structure
 
Cash Store Financial is a holding company with no operations of its own and, as such, depends on subsidiaries for cash. If the Company’s subsidiaries do not generate a sufficient amount of cash, the entity’s liquidity (ability to service indebtedness and fund operations) would be materially impaired.
 
Information Systems
 
The Company relies upon information systems to manage and operate its operations. Operations maintains a stand-alone computer system, and on a daily basis, each branch forwards their daily transaction files to head office via the Internet to permit the Company to reconcile cash balances and to report revenues and loan transactions to the Company’s head office. In addition, the branches utilize the Internet to load customer advances on debit cards and prepaid credit cards.  The Company is reliant on a third-party provider for these debit and credit card services.  Any extended disruption to the Company’s computer systems or the Internet could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and/or financial condition.
 

 
- 11 -

 


 
Economic Factors
 
The success of the Company is dependant on sustained consumer demand for its products and services. A change in economic condition could have an adverse effect on consumer demand for short-term advances, and thus the Company’s results of operations and its financial condition.
 
Economic Environment
 
During periods of economic and financial market uncertainty, we analyze the impact of market fluctuations on the industry, particularly in the areas of revenue growth, default rates and access to capital. To date, we have not experienced any substantial negative effects to our business or to our ability to meet our customers’ needs; however, there is a risk that economic and financial market uncertainty could impact us and our third-party lenders.
 
Other Factors
 
The Company cautions that the above discussion of risk factors is not exhaustive. Other factors beyond the Company’s control that may affect future results include changes in tax laws, technological changes, unexpected changes in consumer spending and saving habits, timely development and introduction of new products, and the anticipation of and success in managing the associated risks.
 
DIVIDENDS
 
Prior to August 31, 2007, we had not declared or paid a dividend on our common shares.  We declared our first dividend on August 31, 2007, in the amount of $.025 cents per common share.  In total, dividends of $3.6 million were paid to holders of common shares in fiscal 2008, $5.3 million in fiscal 2009, and $9.1 million in the fifteen months of fiscal 2010 ($1.7 million in the fifth quarter of fiscal 2010).  Dividends declared per common share for the fifteen month period ended September 30, 2009, totalled $0.575, up from $0.335 for the year ended June 30, 2009.
 
On November 24, 2010, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per common share. The dividend is payable on December 21, 2010, to shareholders of record on December 6, 2010.
 
Our current dividend policy is to declare and pay quarterly cash dividends at the discretion of the Board of Directors, as circumstances permit, in an aggregate annual amount equal to approximately 30% of the prior year’s net income.  Our dividend policy and practice will be reviewed from time to time in the context of our earnings, financial condition, the need to retain earnings to fund future growth of our business, and other relevant factors. The declaration of a dividend will always be at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
 
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
 
General Description of Capital Structure
 
Cash Store Financial is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares having the following rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions:
 
1.
The holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, every meeting of the shareholders of Cash Store Financial and shall have one vote for each such common share held.
 
2.
Subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to any preferred shares of Cash Store Financial, the holders of common shares are entitled to receive such dividends as the directors may from time to time, by resolution, declare.
 
3.
Subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to any shares of Cash Store Financial, in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Cash Store Financial or upon any distribution of the assets of Cash Store Financial among shareholders being made (other than by way of dividends out of monies properly applicable to the payment of dividends), the holders of common shares shall be entitled to share pro rata.
 

 
- 12 -

 


MARKET FOR SECURITIES
 
Trading Price and Volume
 
The Company’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol “CSF” and on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “CSFS”.  The volume and price range for the common shares as traded on the TSX for each month for the fifteen month period ended September 30, 2010, was as follows:
 
Month ended
Volume of shares traded
Price Range ($CDN)
Low
High
July, 2009
1,317,154
7.85
9.46
August, 2009
529,263
8.28
9.50
September, 2009
 761,619
8.26
9.58
October, 2009
790,215
8.53
10.48
November, 2009
895,372
9.64
12.50
December, 2009
657,792
9.10
11.11
January, 2010
1,454,172
10.20
12.24
February, 2010
544,008
11.10
12.50
March, 2010
1,311,151
12.50
15.00
April, 2010
1,529,047
14.80
18.74
May, 2010
1,293,477
14.11
18.10
June, 2010
944,343
15.60
17.16
July, 2010
356,699
14.37
16.64
August, 2010
695,290
15.75
17.28
September, 2010
767,505
15.18
17.18

 
The volume and price range for the common shares as traded on the NYSE from the date the common shares began trading on the NYSE to September 30, 2010, was a follows:
 
Month ended
Volume of shares traded
Price Range ($US)
Low
High
June 8 to June 30, 2010
635,062
15.10
16.66
July, 2010
148,841
13.89
17.32
August, 2010
 475,575
15.14
16.34
September, 2010
263,922
14.77
16.30

 

 
- 13 -

 

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
 
The names and municipalities of residence of the directors and officers of the Company, the date when the individual first became a director, their principal occupations, the positions in the Company held by them and the number and percentage of voting securities of the Company as at November 24, 2010, are as follows:
 
 
Name, Municipality of Residence
 
Position with the Company and Date First Became a Director
 
Principal Occupation (5 preceding years unless otherwise indicated)
 
Number of Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control or
direction is exercised
 
Gordon J. Reykdal
Edmonton, Alberta
 
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
February 23, 2001
 
Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February 2001, prior to which he was the founder, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of RTO Enterprises Inc. (now easyhome Ltd.), a rental  company, since August 1991.
 
 
3,583,700(4)
 
William C. Dunn (2) (3)
Calgary, Alberta
 
Director
 
May 14, 2002
 
Chairman of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd., Director for Precision Drilling Inc.  President of Cardium Service and Supply Ltd. from 1982 to 2000.
 
725,000
 
Edward C. McClelland(3)
Burlington, Ontario
 
Director
 
November 8, 2005
 
CEO of The Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc., listed on the TSX-V exchange since 2009. Previously Vice President for CIBC Finance and President of Transamerica Commercial Finance Canada.
 
 
4,500
 
Robert J.S. Gibson,
CD, ICD.D (2), (3)
Calgary, Alberta
 
 
 
Director
 
April 8, 2008
 
President of Stuart & Company Limited since 1973, as well as Managing Director of Alsten Holdings Ltd. and a Director of Precision Drilling Corp. since 1996.
 
10,000
 
J. Albert (Al) Mondor,
FCA, ICD.D (1)
Edmonton, Alberta
 
 
Director
 
April 8, 2008
 
Chair of Alberta Pension Services Corp. (APS), as well as financial & corporate governance consultant.  Past VP of Sumex Inc., prior to which he was a partner of Grant Thornton LLP, Edmonton.
 
 
11,225
 
Ron Chicoyne,
CFA, CF, ICD.D (1), (2)
Calgary, Alberta
 
 
 
Director
 
October 29, 2008
 
Founder & Managing Director of Links Capital Partners since August 2005.  Previously, Partner and Director of Mercantile Bancorp Limited.
 
 
8,450
 
Michael M. Shaw, B.Comm. (1) (2)
Calgary, Alberta
 
 
Director
 
October 29, 2009
 
Corporate Director and President of Amkco Inc.  Formerly, Managing Director, Strategic Planning ATCO Group.  Prior to this, Managing Director Global Enterprises, ATCO Group.
 
 
 
 
81,133

 
- 14 -

 


 
 
Name, Municipality of Residence
 
Position with the Company and Date First Became a Director
 
Principal Occupation (5 preceding years unless otherwise indicated)
 
Number of Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control or
direction is exercised
 
Barret Reykdal (5)
Edmonton, Alberta
 
President and Chief Operating Officer
 
N/A
 
Chief Operating Officer of the Company’s Operations since April 2005, prior to which he was the Director of Operations for the Company’s Western Canadian operations from March 2003 to April 2005, and prior to which he was the Company’s Northern Alberta Regional Manager since June 2001.
 
 
163,700
 
Nancy Bland
St. Albert, Alberta
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
N/A
 
Chief Financial Officer of the Company since October 2007, prior to which she was the Vice President Finance of the Company.  Prior to joining the Company, her experience includes positions with Capital Health, Luscar Ltd., The Northwest Territories Power Corporation, and Grant Thornton Chartered Accountants.
 
 
2,500
 
S.W. (Bill) Johnson(6)
Edmonton, Alberta
 
Senior Executive Vice President
 
N/A
 
Senior Executive Vice President since November 2008, prior to which he was the President and CEO of Insta-Rent Inc., a public company listed on the TSX-V and prior to which he was the President and COO of the Company’s rental division.  Prior to joining the Company his experience included the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of easyhome Ltd. since January 1996.
 
 
35,600
 
Michael Thompson
Edmonton, Alberta
 
Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary
 
N/A
 
 
Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary since February 2008, prior to which he was the Vice President Investor relations and government affairs.  Prior to Joining the company, he was the President of The Canadian Payday Loan Association.
 
 
4,050
Notes
(1)           Member of Audit Committee.
(2)           Member of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
(3)           Member of Compensation Committee.
(4)
3,222,635 of these shares are directly owned by 424187 Alberta Inc., a company controlled by Mr. Reykdal; 223,468 are held by Mr. Reykdal directly and 137,597 are held by Mr. Reykdal’s spouse.
(5)
Mr. Barret J. Reykdal is the son of Mr. Reykdal, the Corporation’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
(6)
Mr. S. William Johnson ceased employment with Cash Store Financial on March 31, 2008, when the Company spun out the rental division into a separate public company, Insta-Rent Inc. He became President and CEO of Insta-Rent Inc. He was rehired on October 1, 2008, after Insta-Rent Inc. was acquired by easyhome Ltd., a company listed on the TSX.

As at November 24, 2010, the Company’s directors and executive officers together beneficially owned 4,629,858 (27.1%) of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares.
 

 
- 15 -

 

Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions
 
Corporate Cease-Trade Orders or Bankruptcies
 
No director, executive officer of the Company, or shareholder of the Company holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company, or personal holding company of any of such persons, as applicable, is or has been, within the preceding 10 years, a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in such capacity:
 
 
a)
was the subject of a cease-trade order or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemptions under securities legislation for a period of more than 30 consecutive days;
 
 
b)
was subject to an event that resulted, after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director or executive officer, in the Company being the subject of a cease-trade or similar order or an order that denied the other company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days; or
 
 
c)
within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement, or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver-manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets.
 
Penalties or Sanctions
 
No director, executive officer of the Company, or shareholder of the Company holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company, or personal holding company of any such persons, is or has been subject to any penalties or sanctions relating to securities legislation imposed by a court or by a securities regulatory authority, or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority or has been subject to any other penalties or sanction imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision concerning the Company’s securities.
 
Personal Bankruptcies
 
No director, executive officer of the Company, or shareholder of the Company holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company, or a personal holding company of any such persons, is or has, within the preceding 10 years, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement, or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver-manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets.
 
The directors, officers, and shareholders of the Company holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company have furnished the information pertaining to Corporate Cease-Trade Orders or Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions and Personal Bankruptcies.
 
Conflicts of Interest
 
To the best of our knowledge, no director or executive officer of the Company has an existing or potential material conflict of interest with Cash Store Financial or any of its subsidiaries with the exception of the following:
 
 
Mr. Gordon Reykdal, Mr. S. William Johnson and Mr. Edward McClelland are currently on the Board of Directors of The Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc., in which the Company has an investment as described above in “Foreign Operations”. The Company has a service agreement with The Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc. to provide certain administrative functions;
 
 
Mr. Gordon Reykdal and Mr. S. William Johnson are currently on the Board of Directors of RTF Financial Holdings Inc., in which the Company has an investment as described above in “Foreign Operations”. The Company has a service agreement with RTF Financial Holdings Inc. to provide certain administrative functions; and
 
 
Mr. Barret J. Reykdal, the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, is the son of Mr. Reykdal, the Corporation’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
 

 
- 16 -

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
In prior periods, the Company was served with three separate Statements of Claim by individuals resident in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Ontario alleging that Cash Store Financial is in breach of s. 347 of the Code (the interest rate provision) and certain provincial consumer protection statutes. The claims seek various declarations and damages including the reimbursement of any amounts judged to be illegal. In each of these proceedings, the claimants sought to have their lawsuits certified as Class Actions.  As of September 30, 2010, the status of the three actions is as follows:

 
1.
On March 5, 2004, an action under the Class Proceedings Act was commenced in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by Andrew Bodnar and others proposing that a class action be certified on his own behalf and on behalf of all persons who have borrowed money from the defendants: The Cash Store Inc., Cash Store Financial and All Trans Credit Union Ltd. The action stems from the allegations that all Payday Loan fees collected by the defendants constitute interest and therefore violate s. 347 of the Criminal Code of Canada. On May 25, 2006, the claim in British Columbia was affirmed as a certified class proceeding of Canada by the B.C. Court of Appeal. In fiscal 2007, the plaintiffs in the British Columbia action brought forward an application to have certain of our customers’ third-party lenders added to the claim.  On March 18, 2008, another action commenced in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by David Wournell and others against Cash Store Financial, Instaloans Inc., and others in respect of the business carried out under the name Instaloans since April 2005, collectively, the “Related Actions”.
 
On May 12, 2009, the Company settled the British Columbia Related Actions in principle.  The settlement has been approved by the Court. The settlement does not constitute any admission of liability by Cash Store Financial.
 
Under the terms of the court approved settlement, the Company is to pay to the eligible class members who were advanced funds under a loan agreement and who repaid the Payday Loan plus brokerage fees and interest in full, or who met certain other eligibility criteria, a maximum estimated amount of $9.4 million in cash and $9.4 million in credit vouchers. Thus, the estimated maximum exposure with respect to this settlement is approximately $18.8 million including approved legal expenses.  The credit vouchers may be used to pay existing outstanding brokerage fees and interest or to pay a portion of brokerage fees and interest which may arise in the future through new loans advanced. The credit vouchers are not transferable and have no expiry date. In addition, the Company is to pay the legal fees and costs of the class. Based on the Company’s estimate of the rate of take-up of the available cash and credit vouchers, an expense of $7.7 million to date has been recorded to cover the estimated costs of the settlement, including legal fees of the Class and costs to administer the settlement fund.  It is possible that additional settlement costs could be required. As at September 30, 2010, the remaining accrual is $2.0 million.
 
 
2.
The Company has been served in prior fiscal periods with a Statement of Claim issued in Alberta alleging that we are in breach of s. 347 of the Code (the interest rate provision) and certain provincial consumer protection statutes.
 
The certification motion has been pending since fiscal 2006 and has not yet been heard.  On January 19, 2010, the plaintiffs in the Alberta action brought forward an application to have a related subsidiary, as well as certain of our customers’ third-party lenders, directors and officers added to the Claim.
 
We believe that we conduct our business in accordance with applicable laws and are defending the action vigorously.  However, the likelihood of loss, if any, is not determinable at this time.
 
 
3.
On April 23, 2010, an action under the Manitoba Class Proceedings Act was commenced in the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench by Scott Meeking against The Cash Store, Instaloans, and Cash Store Financial proposing that a class action be certified on his own behalf and on behalf of all persons in Manitoba and others outside the province who elect to claim in Manitoba and who obtained a payday loan from The Cash Store or Instaloans.  The action stems from the allegations that all payday loan fees collected by the defendants constitute interest and therefore violate s. 347 of the Code.
 
We believe that we conducted our business in accordance within applicable laws and are defending the action vigorously.  Further it will be maintained that most of the proposed class members are bound by the judgment in the settlement of the Ontario class action, as approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the action may not be maintained in its present form.  However, the likelihood of loss, if any, is not determinable.  Accordingly, no provision has been made for this action in the accounts.
 

 
- 17 -

 

The Company is also involved in other claims related to the normal course of operations.  Management believes that it has adequately provided for these claims.
 
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
 
To the best of the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Company, no director or executive officer of the Company or person or company that is the direct or indirect beneficial owner of, or who exercises control or direction over more than 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company, or any of their associates or affiliates, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction within the three most recently completed financial years, or during the current financial year, that has materially affected, or will materially affect, the Company.
 
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS
 
Computershare Investor Services Inc. acts as the transfer agent and registrar for Cash Store Financial through its office in Toronto, Ontario.
 
EXPERTS
 
KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants (“KPMG”) were the auditors of the Company for the fifteen month period ended September 30, 2010, and prepared and executed the audit report accompanying the annual financial statements.  KPMG has confirmed their independence with respect to the Company within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta.
 
AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION
 
Audit Committee’s Charter
 
The Company’s Audit Committee charter sets out its roles and objectives, responsibilities and duties, and membership standards for reporting to the Board of Directors.  A copy of the charter is attached hereto as Appendix “A”.
 
Composition of the Audit Committee
 
The Company’s Audit Committee is comprised of three directors, all of whom are independent directors: J. Albert (Al) Mondor, Michael Shaw, and Ron Chicoyne.  Each member of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws.
 
Relevant Education and Expertise
 
The following section lists the relevant education and experience for each Audit Committee member.
 
 
1.
J. Albert (Al) Mondor, FCA, ICD.D (Chairman of the Audit Committee)
 
Mr. Mondor is a Fellow of Chartered Accountants and holds the ICD.D designation of the Institute of Corporate Directors.  Currently, he is Chair of the Alberta Pension Services Corporation (APS) which administers contributions, transfers and pension payments on behalf of 9 public sector pension plans in Alberta.  He has continued to provide consulting services regarding financial and corporate governance matters subsequent to his retirement as a senior audit partner with Grant Thornton LLP, Edmonton.  Additionally, Mr. Mondor is a past Vice President of Sumex Inc.
 
 
2.
Ron Chicoyne, CFA, CF, ICD.D
 
Mr. Chicoyne holds a Chartered Financial Analyst designation, Corporate Finance Qualification, Institute of Corporate Directors designation and received his Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree from the University of Manitoba.  He is the founder and Managing Director of Links Capital Partners Ltd., a boutique corporate finance firm.  Prior to this, he was a partner and director of the private equity firm Mercantile Bancorp Ltd.
 
 
3.
Michael Shaw, B.Comm.
 
Mr. Shaw graduated from Queen’s University with a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree and currently serves on 4 other boards of directors.  Over 30 years with the ATCO Group of companies, Mr. Shaw held a wide variety of positions including Managing Director, Global Enterprises (responsible for the activities of 6 non-regulated companies operating in various locations around the globe).
 

 
- 18 -

 

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
 
As part of the Company’s corporate governance structure, the Audit Committee annually reviews and approves the terms and scope of the auditor’s engagement. To further ensure that the independence of the auditors is not compromised, company policy requires that the Audit Committee also pre-approve all significant engagements of the auditors for non-audit services and monitor all other engagements.
 
All non-audit service engagements, regardless of the cost estimate, are required to be coordinated and approved by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, or designate, to further ensure that adherence to this policy is monitored. All non-audit service engagements must also be reported to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis.
 
External Audit Fees by Category
 
KPMG has served continually as the Company’s external shareholders’ auditor since January 2002.  The following table lists the fees billed by KPMG, by category, during the last two fiscal years:
 
 
Fifteen months ended September 30, 2010
Year ended June 30, 2009
Audit fees
$329,831
$195,178
Audit-related fees
$42,700
$ nil
Tax fees
$8,450
$6,510
All other fees
$40,400
$69,150
Total fees
$421,381
$270,838

 
Audit Fees
 
Audit fees were paid for professional services rendered by the auditors for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements or services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and the review of the Company’s interim financial statements.
 
Audit-related Fees
 
Audit-related fees were paid for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the annual financial statements and are not reported under the audit fees item above. These services consisted of special attest services as required by various government entities and include services provided in relation to foreign investments.
 
Tax Fees
 
Tax fees were paid for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services consisted of tax compliance including the review of a goods and services tax re-assessment.
 
All Other Fees
 
All other fees were paid for products or services other than the audit fees, audit-related fees and tax fees described above including services provided in relation to the class action lawsuits and other.
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
Additional information relating to the Company is available at www.sedar.com.
 
Additional information, including directors’ and officers’ remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of the Company’s securities, and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is contained in the Company’s management information circular dated November 24, 2010.
 
Additional financial information is provided in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) for the fifteen month period ended September 30, 2010, both of which are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Security-holders may also obtain a copy of the Company’s financials statements and MD&A by writing to the Company at 17631 - 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5S 1N8, or through the Company’s website at www.csfinancial.ca.
 

 

 
- 19 -

 

Appendix “A” - Audit Committee Charter
 

 
THE CASH STORE FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
(the “Corporation”)

AUDIT COMMITTEE
MANDATE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE
GENERAL
 
The purpose of this document is to establish the Charter of the Audit Committee of The Cash Store Financial Services Inc.
 
PURPOSE
 
 
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to:
 
 
(a)
review and recommend to the Board for acceptance, prior to their public release, all material financial information required to be gathered and disclosed by the Corporation;
 
 
(b)
oversee management designed and implemented accounting systems and internal controls; and
 
 
(c)
recommend, engage, supervise, arrange for the compensation and ensure the independence of the external auditor to the Corporation.
 
STRUCTURE
 
The Audit Committee will be comprised of at least three members of the Board each of whom will at all times be independent and financially literate as those terms are defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-110, and Section 303A.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, and possess:
 
 
(a)
an understanding of the accounting principles used by the Corporation to prepare its financial statements;
 
 
(b)
the ability to assess the general application of such accounting principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;
 
 
(c)
experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Corporation’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more individuals engaged in such activities;
 
 
(d)
an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and
 
 
(e)
in the case of the Audit Committee financial expert, an understanding of audit committee functions.
 
The Audit Committee shall have at least one audit committee financial expert who has acquired the attributes listed above through education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant, auditor, experience in positions performing similar functions, experience supervising persons performing similar functions, experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements, or other relevant experience.
 
The Audit Committee is required to meet in person, or by telephone conference call, at least once each quarter and as often thereafter as required to discharge the duties of the Audit Committee.
 
Each member of the Audit Committee shall serve during the pleasure of the Board of Directors and, in any event, only so long as that person shall be a director. The Directors may fill vacancies in the Audit Committee by election from among their number. The Board of Directors may remove a member of the Audit Committee at any time in its sole discretion by resolution of the Board of Directors.
 

 
- 20 -

 

In connection with the appointment of the members of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors will determine whether any proposed nominee for the Committee serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies. To the extent that any proposed nominee for membership on the Audit Committee serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies, the Board of Directors will make a determination as to whether such simultaneous services would impair the ability of such member to effectively serve on the Audit Committee and may disclose such determination in the Corporation’s annual report on Form 40-F filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
The Chair of the Audit Committee appointed by the Board will, in consultation with the members, determine the schedule, time and place of meetings, and in consultation with management and the external auditor, establish the agenda for meetings.
 
A quorum for a meeting of the Audit Committee shall be a majority of members present in person or by telephone conference call.
 
Notice of the time and place of every meeting shall be given in writing, by email or facsimile to each member of the Audit Committee at least 24 hours prior to the time fixed for such meeting, provided that a member may in any manner waive a notice of meeting.
 
RESPONSIBILITIES
 
The Audit Committee is responsible for:
 
 
 
(a)
assisting Board oversight of the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements, and the Corporation’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
 
 
(b)
discussing issues of its choosing with the external auditor, management and corporate counsel;
 
 
(c)
establishing procedures for the confidential anonymous submission by employees of the Corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Following the receipt of any complaints received submitted through the confidential process established by the Corporation, if a complaint is deemed to require further investigation, the Audit Committee shall take appropriate steps to carry out such investigation, including appointing the appropriate investigators with respect to such complaint;
 
 
(d)
establishing procedures for the receipt and treatment of complaints received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters and the retention (for at least 7 years) of copies of concerns and evidence of investigations; and
 
 
(e)
making inquiries of the external auditor and legal counsel to the Corporation regarding potential claims, assessments, contingent liabilities, and legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements of the Corporation.
 
To preserve the independence of the external auditor responsible for preparing or issuing an auditor’s report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Corporation, the Audit Committee is responsible to:
 
 
(a)
recommend to the Board the external auditor to be nominated;
 
 
(b)
recommend to the Board the external auditor’s compensation;
 
 
(c)
evaluate the external auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence including by annually reviewing:
 
 
(i)
a report of the auditor describing its internal quality-control procedures;
 
 
(ii)
material issues raised by its most recent internal quality-control review; and
 
 
(iii)
the results of any inquiry or investigation by government or professional authorities of the auditor within the last five years;
 
 
(d)
review the experience and qualifications of the senior members of the external auditors, ensure that the lead audit partner is replaced periodically in accordance with applicable law, and that the audit firm continues to be independent;
 

 
- 21 -

 

 
(e)
review and pre-approve any engagements for non-audit services to be provided by the external auditor and its affiliates in light of the estimated fees and impact on the external auditor’s independence;
 
 
(f)
review with management and with the external auditor:
 
 
(i)
any proposed changes in major accounting policies;
 
 
(ii)
the presentation and impact of significant risks and uncertainties; and
 
 
(iii)
key estimates and judgments of management that may be material to financial reporting; and
 
 
(g)
review and approve the Corporation’s hiring policies regarding partners, employees and former partners and employees of the present and most recent former external auditor of the Corporation in compliance with the requirements set out in section 2.4 of Multilateral Instrument 52-110.
 
The Audit Committee is required to:
 
 
(a)
maintain direct communications with the internal and external auditors;
 
 
(b)
discuss and review specific issues with the external auditor;
 
 
(c)
oversee the work of the external auditor;
 
 
(d)
resolve any disagreements between management and the external auditor;
 
 
(e)
meet with the external auditor at least annually in the absence of management;
 
 
(f)
ensure that the external auditor is answerable to the Audit Committee, as representatives of the shareholders, rather than to the executive officers and management;
 
 
(g)
pre-approve all audit services;
 
 
(h)
meet with the external auditor prior to the audit to review the scope and general extent of the external auditor’s annual audit including planning and staffing the audit and the factors considered in determining the audit scope, including risk factors;
 
 
(i)
upon completion of the annual audit and prior to public disclosure, review the following with the CEO, CFO and executive officers:
 
 
(i)
annual financial statements, footnotes and management discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;
 
 
(ii)
significant accounting judgments and reporting principles, practices and procedures applied in preparing the financial statements, including newly adopted accounting policies and the reasons for their adoption;
 
 
(iii)
results of the combined audit of the financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting, if applicable;
 
 
(iv)
significant changes to the audit plan, if any, and any disputes or difficulties with management encountered during the audit, including any disagreements which, if not resolved, would have caused the external auditor to issue a non-standard report on the Corporation’s financial statements; and
 
 
(v)
co-operation received by the external auditor during its audit including access to all requested records, data and information.
 

 
- 22 -

 

The Audit Committee will:
 
 
(a)
be satisfied and obtain reasonable assurances from management and the external auditors that:
 
 
(i)
accounting systems are reliable;
 
 
(ii)
prescribed internal controls are effective; and
 
 
(iii)
adequate procedures are in place for the review of the disclosure of financial information extracted or derived from the Corporation’s financial statements;
 
 
(b)
periodically assess the adequacy of accounting systems, internal controls and procedures for the review of disclosure of financial information;
 
 
(c)
direct the external auditor’s examinations to particular issues;
 
 
(d)
review control weaknesses identified by the external auditor and management’s response;
 
 
(e)
review with the external auditor its view of the qualifications and performance of the key financial and accounting executives:
 
 
(f)
consider and review the following issues with management and the Director of internal audit:
 
 
(i)
significant findings of the internal audit group as well as management’s response to them;
 
 
(ii)
any difficulties encountered in the course of their internal audits, including any restrictions on the scope of their work or access to required information;
 
 
(iii)
the internal auditing budget and staffing;
 
 
(iv)
the Audit Services Charter; and
 
 
(v)
compliance with the The Institute of Internal Auditors’ Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing;
 
 
(g)
approve the appointment, replacement, or dismissal of the Director of the internal audit group;
 
 
(h)
review and approve the compensation of the Director of the internal audit group;
 
 
(i)
review and approve the reporting relationship of the internal auditor to ensure that an appropriate segregation of duties is maintained and that the internal auditor has an obligation to report directly to the Audit Committee on matters affecting the Audit Committee’s duties, irrespective of his or her other reporting relationships;
 
 
(j)
direct the Director of the internal audit group to review any specific areas the Committee deems necessary; and
 
 
(k)
discuss the Corporation’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management are undertaken.
 

 
REPORTING
 
The Audit Committee is responsible, following each meeting, to report to the Board regarding its activities, findings, recommendations, any issues that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements, compliance with applicable law, the performance and independence of the external auditor and the effectiveness of the internal audit function.
 
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending their approval to the Board, prior to their distribution, of all:
 
 
(a)
interim and annual financial statements and notes thereto;
 

 
- 23 -

 

 
(b)
management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations;
 
 
(c)
relevant sections of the annual report, annual information form and management information circular containing financial information;
 
 
(d)
forecasted financial information and forward-looking statements;
 
 
(e)
press releases and other documents in which financial statements, earnings forecasts, results of operations or other financial information is disclosed; and
 
 
(f)
disclosure of the selection of accounting policies (and changes thereto), major accounting judgments, accruals and estimates.
 
The Audit Committee will annually, prior to public disclosure of its annual financial statements, ensure that the external auditor has current participant status with, and is in compliance with, any restriction or sanction imposed by the Canadian Public Accountability Board.
 
The Audit Committee will prepare any reports required to be prepared by the Committee under applicable law including quarterly reports regarding ongoing investigations made pursuant to the Company’s Whistleblower Policy.
 
The Audit Committee is responsible to annually review, and in its discretion, make recommendations to the Board regarding changes to its Charter and the position description of its Chair.
 
The Audit Committee has the power, at the expense of the Company, to retain, instruct, compensate and terminate independent advisors to assist the Audit Committee in the discharge of its duties.
 

 
Approved by the Board of Directors - November 24, 2010
 

 

 
- 24 -