osec20fa1-6302011.htm

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [ ] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [ ] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

U.S. GAAP				[X]
International Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board				[ ]
Other				[ ]
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17	[ ]	Item 18	[ ]

REASON FOR AMENDMENT

The sole purpose of this Amendment to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2011 is to furnish the required Certifications. No other changes have been made to this 20-F, and this Amendment has not been updated to reflect events occurring subsequent to the filing of this 20-F.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

	PART I

Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers.	3
Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable.	3
Item 3.	Key Information.	3
Item 4.	Information on the Company.	8
Item 4A.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	12
Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.	12
Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees.	15
Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.	17
Item 8.	Financial Information.	18
Item 9.	The Offer and Listing.	18
Item 10.	Additional Information.	19
Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	25
Item 12.	Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities.	25

	PART II

Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.	25
Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.	25
Item 15.	Controls and Procedures.	25
Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert.	27
Item 16B.	Code of Ethics.	27
Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.	27
Item 16D.	Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committee.	27
Item 16E.	Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.	28
Item 16F.	Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.	28
Item 16G.	Corporate Governance.	28

	PART III

Item 17.	Financial Statements.	28
Item 18.	Financial Statements.	28
Item 19.	Exhibits.	40

Signatures		41

Exhibit Index		42

Ontario Solar Energy Corporation, or the Company, desires to take advantage of the safe harbour provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbour legislation. This document and any other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf may include forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The words ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘intends’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘forecast’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘potential’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘expect’’ and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Please note in this annual report, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, ‘‘our’’, ‘‘the Company’’, all refer to the Company.

The forward-looking statements in this document are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections.

In addition to these important factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength of world economies, fluctuations in currencies and interest rates, general market conditions, changes in the Company’s operating expenses, changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, general domestic and international political conditions and other important factors described from time to time in the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The following selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is derived from our audited financial statements. The selected financial data, as well as the financial statements and accompanying notes, are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Registrant presents its financial statements in United States dollars. All dollar amounts in this Form 20-F are in United States dollars, except where otherwise indicated. You should read the following selected financial data with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and accompanying notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.

	Year ended June 30, 2011	Year ended June 30, 2010	Period from inception to June 30, 2011

Revenue	$164,975	$-	$164,975
Operating expenses	97,547	123,185	220,732
Net Income (loss)	67,428	(123,185)	(55,757)

Income (loss) per share – basic	$0.01	$(0.02)
Income (loss) per share – diluted	$0.01	$(0.02)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding	11,541,666	7,151,077

	Year ended June 30, 2011	Year ended June 30, 2010
Balance Sheet Data

Cash and cash equivalent	$278,500	$293,865
Total current assets	428,857	294,222
Total assets	428,857	294,222
Total current liabilities	70,565	3,358
Total liabilities	70,565	3,358
Total accumulated deficits	(55,757)	(123,185)
Total shareholders’ equity	358,292	290,864

The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks that generally apply to publicly traded companies, that are not yet identified or that are currently perceived as immaterial, may also impair our business operations. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected by any of the following risks. You should refer to the other information set forth in this document, including our financial statements and the related notes.

This annual report also contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. These statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans” and similar expressions. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these statements. Factors that could contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report.

It may be difficult to evaluate our business and prospects because we have a limited operating history. We were incorporated on September 3, 2009 under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. In our first two years of operations, we focused our business we only have limited revenue and there is no assurance of future revenue generation. Our operation is still in development stage and is susceptible to all risks associated with start-up company. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon:

Because our sole officer and director will only be devoting limited time to our operations, our operations may be sporadic which may result in periodic interruptions or suspensions of operations. This activity could prevent us from attracting purveyors and clients and result in a lack of revenues that may cause us to suspend or cease operations.

Our sole officer and director, Oliver Xing, will only be devoting limited time to our operations. Oliver Xing will be devoting approximately 15 hours per week of his time to our operations. Because our sole officer and director will only be devoting limited time to our operations, our operations may be sporadic and occur at times which are convenient to him. As a result, operations may be periodically interrupted or suspended which could result in a lack of revenues and a possible cessation of operations.

Because our sole officer and director inexperienced with providing consulting services related to solar energy, we may have to hire qualified persons to assist him with our consulting services. Our sole officer and director has no direct formal training or experience in this area and as a result may not be fully aware of many of the specific requirements related to working within the industry. Management’s decisions and choices may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches companies commonly use. Consequently our operations, earnings and ultimate financial success could suffer irreparable harm due to management’s lack of experience in this industry. As a result we may have to suspend or cease operations which will result in the loss of your investment.

Oliver Xing is our sole officer and director. We are extremely dependent upon him to conduct our operations. If he should resign or die we will not have a chief executive officer. If that should occur, until we find another person to act as our chief executive officer, our operations could be suspended. In that event it is possible you could lose your entire investment.

We are small and have not yet begun material operations. As a result we may not be able to compete with other providers of solar energy consulting services. If we are unable to compete with other providers of solar energy, we may have to suspend or cease operations - and in that event it is possible you could lose your entire investment.

We do not have any policies or procedures for review, approval, or ratification of related party transactions. As a result, we have no procedures to determine if a related party transaction is more or less favourable to us as could be obtained from an unrelated third party. Accordingly, when we enter into a related party transaction, it could be on terms less favourable to us as could be obtained from independent third parties.

Our shares would be classified as penny stocks and are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated there under which impose additional sales practice requirements on brokers/dealers who sell our securities in this offering or in the aftermarket. For sales of our securities, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination and receive from you a written agreement prior to making a sale for you. Because of the imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices, it is possible that brokers will not want to make a market in our shares. This could prevent you from reselling your shares and may cause the price of the shares to decline.

We have been organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. All of our assets are located outside the United States. In addition, our sole officer and director and our auditor are residents of Canada. While a cross boarder treatise exists between the United States and Canada relating to the enforcement of foreign judgments, the process of such is cumbersome and in some cases has prevented the enforcement of judgments. As a result, while actions may be brought in Canada, it may be impossible for you to affect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce against us or these persons any judgments in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under United States federal securities laws. In addition, a Canadian court may not permit you to bring an original action in Canada or to enforce in Canada a judgment of a U.S. court based upon civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws.

Substantially all of our revenue is expected to be earned in Canadian dollars. A significant portion of our expenses is incurred in Canadian dollars. Changes in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar may result in currency translation gains and losses and could adversely affect our operating results. To date, foreign currency exposure has been minimal. However, in the future we may consider hedging all or a significant portion of our annual estimated Canadian dollar expenses to minimize our Canadian dollar exposure.

As of June 30, 2011, Oliver Xing, our President and Chief Executive Officer and director, personally and indirectly through his spouse, beneficially owned approximately 9,250,000 shares or 80.14 % of our outstanding common shares. As a result, Mr. Xing can exert substantial influence over us and influence most matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors, and thereby exercise significant control over our affairs. The voting power of Mr. Xing under certain circumstances could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our control, the effect of which may be to deprive you of a control premium that might otherwise be realized in connection with our acquisition.

Our common stock trades in the over-the-counter market on the OTCQB. As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the value of, our common stock. Because our common stock is subject to federal securities rules affecting penny stock, the market liquidity for our common stock may be adversely affected.

Our common stock could become subject to additional sales practice requirements for low priced securities. Our common stock could become subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that sell our shares of common stock to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouses.

Rule 15g-9 requires a broker-dealer to make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and may affect the ability of our shareholders to sell any of our securities in the secondary market; generally define a “penny stock” to be any non-Nasdaq equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions; requires broker dealers to deliver, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock market.

Disclosure is also required to be made about compensation payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. In addition, the rule requires that broker dealers deliver to customers monthly statements that disclose recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada on September 3, 2009. The Company is in the development stage as defined under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) codification 915 “Development Stage Entities” and it intends to commence business operations by providing consulting services to solar energy developers in Ontario, Canada. The Company has not generated any revenue for the period of September 3, 2009 to June 30, 2010, and only generated $164,975 revenue for the year ended June 30, 2011. Management believes the Company’s operations are subject to all risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise because its revenue is still an immaterial amount and there is no assurance that future revenue will be generated. The Solar energy consulting business is highly competitive.

We were incorporated in the Province of Ontario, Canada on September 3, 2009. We intend to continue to provide consulting services to corporations which will assist them with the development of their solar projects. We maintain our statutory registered agent’s office and our business office is located at 255 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 203, Toronto, Ontario M3B 3H9. Our telephone number is (416) 510-2991.

We have no plans to change our planned business activities or to combine with another business, and we are not aware of any events or circumstances that might cause these plans to change. We are a development stage company and our plan of operation is prospective and there is no assurance that we will begin profitable operations.

Electric power is used to operate businesses, industries, homes, offices and provides the power for our communications, entertainment, transportation and medical needs. As our energy supply and distribution mix changes, electricity is likely to be used more for local transportation (electric vehicles) and space/water heating needs.

*	Limited Energy Supplies. The primary fuels that have supplied this industry, fossil fuels in the form of oil, coal and natural gas, are limited. Worldwide demand is increasing at a time that industry experts have concluded that supply is limited. Therefore, the increased demand will probably result in increased prices, making it more likely that long-term average costs for electricity will continue to increase.

*	Generation, Transmission and Distribution Infrastructure Costs. Historically, electricity has been generated in centralized power plants transmitted over high voltage lines, and distributed locally through lower voltage transmission lines and transformer equipment. As electricity needs increase, these systems will need to be expanded. Without further investments in this infrastructure, the likelihood of power shortages (“brownouts” and “blackouts”) may increase.

*	Stability of Suppliers. Since many of the major countries who supply fossil fuel are located in unstable regions of the world, purchasing oil and natural gas from these countries may increase the risk of supply shortages and cost increases.

*	Environmental Concerns and Climate Change. Concerns about global warming and greenhouse gas emissions has resulted in the Kyoto Protocol various states enacting stricter emissions control laws and utilities in several states being required to comply with Renewable Portfolio Standards, which require the purchase of a certain amount of power from renewable sources.

Solar energy is the underlying energy source for renewable fuel sources, including biomass fuels and hydroelectric energy. Biomass fuel is a renewable energy source comprised of biological material derived from living, or recently living organisms, such as wood, waste, (hydrogen) gas, and alcohol fuels. By extracting energy directly from the sun and converting it into an immediately usable form, either as heat or electricity, intermediate steps are eliminated. We believe, in this sense, solar energy is one of the most direct and unlimited energy sources.

Solar energy can be converted into usable forms of energy either through the photovoltaic effect (generating electricity from photons) or by generating heat (solar thermal energy). Solar thermal systems include traditional domestic hot water collectors (DHW), swimming pool collectors, and high temperature thermal collectors (used to generate electricity in central generating systems). DHW thermal systems are typically distributed on rooftops so that they generate heat for the building on which they are situated. High temperature thermal collectors typically use concentrating mirror systems and are typically located in remote sites.

Economic — Once a solar power system is installed, the cost of generating electricity is fixed over the lifespan of the system. There are no risks that fuel prices will escalate or fuel shortages will develop. In addition, cash paybacks for systems range from 5 to 25 years, depending on the level of state and federal incentives, electric rates, annualized sun intensity; and installation costs. Solar power systems at customer sites generally qualify for net metering to offset a customer’s highest electric rate tiers, at the retail, as opposed to the wholesale, electric rate. Solar energy does not have any tiered rates. Utility companies sell electricity at tiered rates depending on the amount of electricity you use. You pay a different rate in each tier, the more electricity you use, the more you are charged per unit of electricity. The baseline rate is the lowest rate charged; as you use more electricity the rate charged increases. The unit of electricity you are charged for is the Kilowatt-Hour (kWh). By charging different rates for energy usage, the utility company is attempting to reward conservation by charging a lot more if you use higher amounts of energy; how nice of them. The less energy you use, the less per kWh you pay.

*	Convenience — Solar power systems can be installed on a wide range of sites, including small residential roofs, the ground, covered parking structures and large industrial buildings. Solar power systems also have few, if any, moving parts and are generally guaranteed to operate for 25 years resulting, we believe, in low maintenance and operating costs and reliability compared to other forms of power generation.

*	Environmental — We believe solar power systems are one of the most environmentally friendly way of generating electricity. There are no harmful greenhouse gas emissions, no wasted water, no noise, no waste generation and no particulates. Such benefits continue for the life of the system.

*	Security — Producing solar power improves energy security both on an international level (by reducing fossil energy purchases from hostile countries) and a local level (by reducing power strains on local electrical transmission and distribution systems).

*	Infrastructure — Solar power systems can be installed at the site where the power is to be used, thereby reducing electrical transmission and distribution costs. Solar power systems installed and operating at customer sites may also save the cost of construction of additional energy infrastructure including power plants, transmission lines, distribution systems and operating costs.

Our sole officer and director believes that escalating fuel costs, environmental concerns and energy security make it likely that the demand for solar power systems will continue to grow. He has concluded the foregoing based upon his observations over the last two years. It does not require any expertise to see that the cost of fuel has risen, environmental concerns have increased, and energy security makes solar energy attractive. Solar energy is free at the source of the sun and the capture thereof is not taxed anywhere in the world. The federal government, and several states, have put a variety of incentive programs in place that directly spur the installation of grid-tied solar power systems, so that customers will “purchase” their own power generating system rather than “renting” power from a local utility. These programs include:

*	Rebates — to customers (or to installers) to reduce the initial cost of the solar power system, generally based on the size of the system.

*	Renewable Energy Grants – the federal government will provide grants equal for the development of solar power energy.

*	Tax Credits — federal and state income tax offsets directly reducing ordinary income tax. New York and California currently offer state tax credits. There is currently a 30% federal tax credit for residential and commercial solar power systems. Commercial customers can elect either a 30% cash payment from the federal grant program or the traditional tax credit. Effective from the beginning of 2009, the $2,000 cap on the federal tax credit for residential solar power systems has been removed, and that credit is now uncapped.

*	Accelerated Depreciation — solar power systems installed for businesses (including applicable home offices) are generally eligible for accelerated depreciation.

*	Net Metering — provides a full retail credit for energy generated.

*	Feed-in Tariffs — are additional credits to consumers based on how much energy their solar power system generates. Feed-in Tariffs set at appropriate rates have been successfully used in Europe to accelerate growth.

*	Renewable Portfolio Standards — require utilities to deliver a certain percentage of power generated from renewable energy sources.

*	Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) — are additional credits provided to customers based on the amount of renewable energy they produce.

*	Solar Rights Acts — state laws to prevent unreasonable restrictions on solar power systems. California’s Solar Rights Act has been updated several times in past years to make it easier for customers of all types and in all locations to install a solar power system.

*	PPA’s — Power Purchase Agreements, or agreements between a solar power system purchaser and an electricity user under which electricity is sold/purchased on a long-term basis.

*	Improve Customer Economics — In most cases, the cost to customers for electricity produced by a solar power system at the customer’s site is comparable to conventional, utility-generated power. We believe lower equipment (primarily solar panels) and installation costs would reduce the total cost of a system and increase the potential market for solar power.

*	Increase System Performance and Reliability — We believe that a design that incorporates factory assembly of an integrated solar power system versus field assembly provides a more reliable solution. A system with these characteristics will deliver improved system performance and allow the customer to achieve the shortest possible payback.

*	Improve Aesthetics — We believe that customers prefer solar panels that blend into existing roof surfaces with fewer shiny parts, mounted closely to the roof surface and have more of a “skylight” appearance than the traditional rooftop metal framed solar panels raised off the roof.

We will meet the foregoing needs by providing advice to persons desiring to implement the use of solar energy in their home or business. Solar energy is an integral aspect of the United Nations Climate Change program with regulatory and voluntary initiatives being implemented by countries, states and corporations across the globe.

Throughout the world massive amounts of energy is consumed and as a result generates emits greenhouse gases which than any other country in the world with the exception of the United States. We define the clean energy sector as being comprised of three segments: Alternative Energy resources, Smart Grid technology, and conservation and efficiency.

We intend to establish a consulting business to provide advice regarding the use of solar energy for in the business environment; assessing property for implementing a solar energy system; and advising customers on the available equipment; and contracting with third parties to install solar equipment. We do not have any tentative or pending business agreements or business combination transactions. Further, and again, we have no plans to merge with, be acquired by, or acquire another business. At the outset, because Mr. Xing does not have experience in the solar energy field, he may have to provide these services through consultation with experienced third parties. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not contacted any experienced third parties, nor is there any assurance that we will or have to retain third parties. If we do have to retain third parties we will, in the future, but not now, consider budgeting funds for their retention. Oliver Xing has experience in general business skills provide the basis for successfully implementing our business plan. However, in the event that Oliver Xing does not believe that he is qualified to provide effective consulting services related to one or more issues, we will hire others to provide such services.

Initially, Oliver Xing will promote our services, discussing them with companies that are seeking advice about solar energy. We also anticipate utilizing several other marketing activities in our attempt to make our services known to corporations and attract clientele. These marketing activities will be designed to inform potential clients about the benefits of using our services and will include the following: development and distribution of marketing literature, direct mail and email, advertising, promotion of our website, and developing industry analyst relations.

We intend to target companies that are seeking to convert to solar energy as a viable alternative energy source. Worldwide, those companies are readily available as entities seeking Green House Credits since their operations require the acquisition of such credits or mandate a cessation of operations. In addition to our website, we intend to send printed materials to such companies we have identified as possible candidates for our services. We will rely upon Oliver Xing to initiate contacts with companies and attract clientele to us.

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of its operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and for the period of September 3, 2009, our date of inception, to June 30, 2010. Because we are an emerging company, the comparisons between our financial statements may not be meaningful and may not necessarily be indicative of our future results of operation.

For the year ended June 30, 2011, we have generated $164,975 in gross revenue (June 30, 2010 – nil). The increase in revenue is due to the facts that the Ontario Government implemented the Feed-in-tariff program and as a result, the solar energy generating market in Ontario is very active, many new businesses were established to participate in the solar energy business. The Company was able to attract customers and provide its services. Management in the year ended June 30, 2011 concentrated its efforts on building up the business as compared with the period ended June 30, 2010 for which management efforts were concentrated on organizing the Company, filing and clearing its registration statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

General and administrative expenses include business travel, expenses of a general nature in up-keeping the Company. For the year ended June 30, 2011, the general and administrative expenses were $51,871 and for the period of September 3, 2009 to June 30, 2010 was $41,053. The amount was accrued in favour of the President for general corporate developments.

At June 30, 2011, the Company had total assets of $428,857 (June 30, 2010 - $294,222) consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $278,500 (June 30, 2010 – $293,865), accounts receivable $150,000 (June 30, 2010 – nil) and tax receivable of $357 (June 30, 2010 - $357). The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to increase in revenue in the year which has not been received as at June 30, 2011.

Financing activities provided $56,207 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, which is an increase in due to related party. For the period of September 3, 2009 to June 30, 2010, financing activities provided $317,407 which was an increase in due to related party of $3,358 and proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $314,049.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, we did not sell any securities to raise fund. From September 3, 2009 to June 30, 2010, we sold approximately 1,541,666 shares of our common shares through private placements with investors and raised $314,049. The offering is being conducted pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S, under the Securities Act of 1933.

To provide working capital for its operations and project development, the Company will need to raise new funds. The Company intends to raise additional capital through the issuance of common shares, through bank loans and through the issuance of related party debt. In addition, from time to time in the past, Oliver Xing, the President of the Company, personally advanced non-interest-bearing loans to the Company for the day-to-day operations of the Company. It is contemplated that it will continue to raise capital primarily in private placements through investors. No assurance, however, can be given that the Company’s future capital requirements will be obtained. The Company’s access to capital is always dependent upon future financial market conditions, especially those pertaining to early-stage companies. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in obtaining future financing, when necessary, on economically acceptable terms.

For the next year ending June 30, 2012, the Company anticipates that it will pay for its administrative and operational costs from existing working capital, from current revenue stream, if any, and from private placements through investors. Due to the development nature of our business, the Company believes it is difficult to estimate its development cash needs, but the Company believes it can raise sufficient working capital to cover its operation requirements, however, no assurances can be given that the Company will be able to raise cash from additional financing efforts. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient funds from future financing, or from current revenues, the Company’s operation could be materially negatively affected, its operation could be forced into suspension.

We have a limited operating history since our operations on September 3, 2009. Consistent with other early-stage companies, expenditures are heavily weighted professional fees, general business development expenses and etc. We realize that these expenditures are necessary in order to maintain our various stringent filing obligations and to compete for customers more effectively and to develop a profitable company capable of surviving and prospering well into the future.

Since our inception on September 3, 2009, Oliver Xing has been our president, principal executive officer, secretary, treasurer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and sole member of the board of directors. Since May 17, 2010, Mr. Xing has been president, principal executive officer, secretary, treasurer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and sole director of CN Resources, Inc., an exploration stage mining company located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. From February, 2006 to May 2007, Mr. Xing was a Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Arehada Mining Limited (formerly Dragon Capital Corporation), a Toronto Stock Exchange listed company. Since March 18, 2005, Mr. Xing has been the managing partner of CRR Capital Markets, Inc. an exempt market dealer located in Ontario, Canada. Further, since 1996, Mr. Xing has been a business consultant to Toronto based corporations. Since February 16, 1996, Mr. Xing has been a Chartered Accountant in Ontario, Canada.

The Company has accrued total compensation of $60,000 to Oliver Xing for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 for all services provided to the Company by Oliver Xing at the capacity as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary and for the period of September 3, 20009 to June 30, 2010, the compensation accrued was $60,000 which was paid by issuing common shares to the Oliver Xing at $0.01 per common share. There is no stock option or other compensation for Oliver Xing.

						Non-	Nonqualified
						Equity	Deferred	All
Name						Incentive	Compensa-	Other
and				Stock	Option	Plan	tion	Compen-
Principal		Salary	Bonus	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Earnings	sation	Total
Position	Year	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Oliver Xing	2011	0	0	0	0	0	0	60,000	60,000
President	2010	0	0	60,000	0	0	0	0	60,000
	2009	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

The member of our board of directors is not compensated for his services as a director. The board has not implemented a plan to award options to any directors. There are no contractual arrangements with any member of the board of directors. We have no director’s service contracts. In the future and when we are financially permitted, we do intend to reimburse independent directors, if any, for out-of-pocket expenses for attending board meetings.

While not required, each of the Company’s directors is a resident of Canada and holds office until the Company’s annual meeting or until his successor is duly elected or appointed. Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors to serve at the Board’s will. The Company has no contracts with any of its Directors that provide for payments upon termination.

As of June 30, 2011, we have no full time or part-time employee nor have we entered any negotiation with anyone concerning any employment with the Company. In the year ended June 30, 2011, we had used services of contractors on needed basis. We believe that we are a new start-up development stage company the current practice of using independent contractor(s) only on needed basis can better preserve company’s cash and reduce costs. However, we may hire full-time or part-time employee in the next twelve months if such need arises and we have determined that it is financially possible for the Company to do so.

The following table sets forth, as of the date of this prospectus, the total number of shares owned beneficially by each of our directors, officers and key employees, individually and as a group, and the present owners of 5% or more of our total outstanding shares. The table also reflects what their ownership will be assuming completion of the sale of all shares in this offering. The stockholders listed below have direct or indirect ownership of their shares and possesses sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares.

	Number of		Percent
Name of owner	Shares	Position	of Class

Oliver Xing	6,000,000	President, President, Principal Executive	51.99%
		Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal
		Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
		Officer and sole director

Early Bird Capital Corporation	2,250,000	Oliver Xing, our sole officer and director	25.99%
		owns 100% of the voting shares of Early
		Bird Capital Corporation

1547698 Ontario Limited	1,000,000	1547698 Ontario Limited is owned by	8.66%
		He Zheng who is the wife of Oliver Xing,
		our president. He Zheng currently holds
		100% of the voting shares of 1547698
		Ontario Limited.

All Officers and Directors
as a Group (1 person)	10,000,000		86.64%

Early Bird Capital Corporation	2,250,000		25.99%

1547698 Ontario Limited	1,000,000		8.66%

For the year ended June 30, 2011, the Company accrued a total of $24,000 management fee and a total of $36,000 for consulting fee which is included in General and administrative fee category to compensate the president for all services rendered to the Company at the capacity as the President, Chief executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. During the period from inception to June 30, 2010, the President has taken initiative to organize, source, secure funding for the Company, provide consulting and management services to the Company and provide necessary office space for the Company. The Company has booked related party transactions of professional fees of $60,000 and general and administrative fees of $40,000 for the period. These related party transaction fees were settled by the Company agreeing to issue to the President and parties related to the President 10,000,000 common shares at $0.01 per common share.

The Company’s common shares are qualified to be traded in the United States on the OTC Bulletin Board. However, as of June 30, 2011, the trading has not commenced, so there is no information or data available to report. Even though our stock is listed on the OTCQB, if traded, the trading price and trading volume can be sporadic. No active established market established within or outside the United States existed for our common stock.

The Company is an Ontario corporation. Canada has no system of exchange controls. There are no Canadian restrictions on the repatriation of capital or earnings of a Canadian public company to non-resident investors. There are no laws in Canada or exchange restrictions affecting the remittance of dividends, profits, royalties and other payments to non-resident holders of the Canadian securities.

There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the controlling documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that the Investment Canada Act may require review and approval by the Minister of Industry (Canada) of certain acquisitions of “control” of the Company by a “non-Canadian.” The threshold for acquisitions of control is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company. ”Non-Canadian” generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.

The following is a brief summary of some of the principal Canadian federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) of the Company’s common shares who deals at arm’s length with and is not affiliated with the Company, holds the shares as capital property and who, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the Canada–United States Income Tax Convention, is at all relevant times resident or deemed to be resident in the United States and is not nor is deemed to be in Canada and does not carry on business in Canada.

This summary is of a general nature only and is not, and should not be interpreted as, legal or tax advice to any particular U.S. Holder and no representation is made with respect to the Canadian income tax consequences to any particular person. Accordingly, U.S. Holders are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to their particular circumstances.

Under the Income Tax Act (Canada) and pursuant to the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention, a U.S. Holder of common shares will be subject to a 15 percent withholding tax on dividends paid or credited or deemed by the Income Tax Act (Canada) to have been paid or credited on such shares. The withholding tax rate is 5 percent, where the U.S. Holder is a corporation that beneficially owns at least 10 percent of the voting shares of the Company.

In general, a U.S. Holder will not be subject to Canadian income tax on capital gains arising on the disposition of the Company common shares unless (i) at any time in the five-year period immediately preceding the disposition, 25 percent or more of the shares of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company were owned (or were under option or subject to an interest in) by the U.S. Holder, by persons with whom the U.S. Holder did

The following is a general discussion of certain possible U.S. federal income tax consequences, under current law, generally applicable to a U.S. Holder of common shares of the Company. This discussion is of a general nature only and does not take into account the particular facts and circumstances, with respect to U.S. federal income tax issues, of any particular U.S. Holder. This discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences. (See “Taxation – Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences”, above).

The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time and which are subject to differing interpretations. This discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any proposed legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.

This discussion is for general information only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any U.S. Holder or prospective U.S. Holder of common shares of the Company, and no opinion or representation with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences to any such U.S. Holder or prospective U.S. Holder is made. Accordingly, U.S. Holders and prospective U.S. Holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common shares of the Company.

As used herein, a “U.S. Holder” means a holder of common shares of the Company who is (i) a citizen or individual resident of the U.S., (ii) a corporation or partnership created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or of any political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate whose income is taxable in the U.S. irrespective of source or (iv) a trust subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and control of a U.S. fiduciary as described Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code.

This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to persons (including persons who are U.S. Holders) subject to special provisions of U.S. federal income tax law, including (i) tax-exempt organizations, (ii) qualified retirement plans, (iii) individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts, (iv) financial institutions, (v) insurance companies, (vi) real estate investment trusts, (vii) regulated investment companies, (viii) broker-dealers, (ix) persons or entities that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, (x) persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, (xi) persons who own their common shares of the Company as part of a straddle, hedging, conversion transaction, constructive sale or other arrangement involving more than one position, (xii) persons who acquired their common shares of the Company through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services, (xiii) persons that own an interest in an entity that owns common shares of the Company, (xiv) persons who own, exercise or dispose of any options, warrants or other rights to acquire common shares of the Company, or (xv) persons who own their common shares of the Company other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.

U.S. Holders receiving distributions (including constructive distributions) with respect to common shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distributions, equal to the U.S. dollar value of such distributions on the date of receipt (based on the exchange rate on such date), to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions. Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal taxable income by those who itemize deductions. (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” below). To the extent that distributions from the Company exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, such distributions will be treated first as a return of capital, to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in the common shares, and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares of the Company. (See more detailed discussion at “Disposition of Common Shares of the Company” below)

In the case of foreign currency received as a distribution that is not converted by the recipient into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Generally any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale or other disposition of the foreign currency, including the exchange for U.S. dollars, will be ordinary income or loss. However, an individual whose realized gain does not exceed $200 will not recognize that gain, to the extent that there are no expenses associated with the transaction that meet the requirements for deductibility as a trade or business expense (other than travel expenses in connection with a business trip) or as an expense for the production of income.

Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company generally will not be eligible for the “dividends received deduction” allowed to corporate shareholders receiving dividends from certain U.S. corporations. Under certain circumstances, a U.S. Holder that is a corporation and that owns shares representing at least 10% of the total voting power and the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares may be entitled to a 70% deduction of the “U.S. source” portion of dividends received from the Company (unless the Company qualifies as a “Foreign Personal Holding Company” or a “Passive Foreign Investment Company” as defined below). The availability of the dividends received deduction is subject to several complex limitations which are beyond the scope of this discussion, and U.S. Holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the dividends received deduction.

Certain information reporting and backup withholding rules may apply with respect to certain payments related to the Company’s common shares. In particular, a payer or middleman within the U.S., or in certain cases outside the U.S., will be required to withhold 31% (which rate is scheduled for periodic adjustment) of any payments to a U.S. Holder of the Company’s common shares of dividends on, or proceeds from the sale of, such common shares within the U.S., if a U.S. Holder fails to furnish its correct taxpayer identification number or otherwise fails to comply with, or establish an exemption from, the backup withholding tax requirements. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS. U.S. Holders should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules applicable to the Company’s common shares.

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian or other foreign income tax with respect to the ownership of common shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either receive a deduction or a tax credit for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces U.S. federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from distributions to) the U.S. Holder during that year.

There are significant and complex limitations that apply to the foreign tax credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder’s U.S. income tax liability that the U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” income bears to his or its worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, the various items of income and deduction must be classified as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” Complex rules govern this classification process. In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income such as “passive income,” “high withholding tax interest,” “financial services income,” “shipping income,” and certain other classifications of income. Dividends distributed by the Company will generally constitute “foreign source” income, and will be classified as “passive income” or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, “financial services income” for these purposes.

In addition, U.S. Holders that are corporations and that own 10% or more of the voting stock of the Company may be entitled to an “indirect” foreign tax credit under Section 902 of the Code with respect to the payment of dividends by the Company under certain circumstances and subject to complex rules and limitations. The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations with respect to the foreign tax credit are fact specific, and each U.S. Holder of common shares of the Company should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the foreign tax credit rules.

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between (i) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and (ii) the shareholder’s tax basis in the common shares of the Company. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. Holder, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if the common shares of the Company are held for more than one year.

Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts. Deductions for net capital losses are subject to significant limitations. For U.S. Holders that are not corporations, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted. For U.S. Holders that are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.

U.S. holders generally are required to calculate their taxable incomes in United States dollars. Accordingly, a U.S. holder who purchases common shares of the Company with Canadian dollars will be required to determine the tax basis of such shares in United States dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing on the settlement date of the purchase (and may be required to recognize the unrealized gain or loss, if any, in the Canadian currency surrendered in the purchase transaction). Similarly, a U.S. holder receiving dividends or sales proceeds from common shares of the Company in Canadian dollars will be required to compute the dividend income or the amount realized on the sale, as the case may be, in United States dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing at the time of receipt in the case of dividends and on the settlement date in the case of sales on an established securities exchange. Gain or loss, if any, recognized on a disposition of Canadian currency in connection with the described transactions generally will be treated as ordinary gain or loss.

If at any time during a taxable year (i) more than 50% of the total voting power or the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals who are citizens or residents of the U.S. and (ii) 60% (or 50% in certain cases) or more of the Company’s gross income for such year is “foreign personal holding company income” as defined in Section 553 of the Code (e.g., dividends, interest, royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions), the Company may be treated as a “Foreign Personal Holding Company” (“FPHC”) In that event, U.S. Holders of common shares of the Company would be required to include in gross income for such year their allocable portions of such “foreign personal holding company income” to the extent the Company does not actually distribute such income.

If (i) 50% or more of the total voting power or the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares is owned, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the U.S., U.S. partnerships or corporations, or U.S. estates or trusts (as defined by the Code Section 7701(a)(30)), and (ii) the Company is found to be engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, commodities, or any interest therein, the Company may be treated as a “Foreign Investment Company” (“FIC”) as defined in Section 1246 of the Code, causing all or part of any gain realized by a U.S. Holder selling or exchanging common shares of the Company to be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gain.

If more than 50% of the total voting power or the total value of the Company’s outstanding shares is owned, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the U.S., U.S. partnerships or corporations, or U.S. estates or trusts (as defined by the Code Section 7701(a)(30)), each of which own, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the total voting power of the Company’s outstanding shares (each a “10% Shareholder”), the Company could be treated as a “Controlled Foreign Corporation” (“CFC”) under Section 957 of the Code.

The classification of the Company as a CFC would affect many complex results, including that 10% Shareholders of the Company would generally (i) be treated as having received a current distribution of the Company’s “Subpart F income” and (ii) would also be subject to current U.S. federal income tax on their pro rata shares of the Company’s earnings invested in “U.S. property.” The foreign tax credit may reduce the U.S. federal income tax on these amounts for such 10% Shareholders (See more detailed discussion at “Foreign Tax Credit” above). In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, gain from the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares of the Company by a U.S. Holder that is or was a 10% Shareholder at any time during the five-year period ending with the sale is treated as ordinary income to the extent of earnings and profits of the Company attributable to the common shares sold or exchanged.

If the Company is classified as both, a Passive Foreign Investment Company, as described below, and, a CFC, the Company generally will not be treated as a Passive Foreign Investment Company with respect to 10% Shareholders. This rule generally will be effective for taxable years of 10% Shareholders beginning after 1997 and for taxable years of the Company ending with or within such taxable years of 10% Shareholders.

The Company does not believe that it currently qualifies as a CFC. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be considered a CFC for the current or any future taxable year. The CFC rules are very complicated, and U.S. Holders should consult their own financial advisor, legal counsel or accountant regarding the CFC rules and how these rules may impact their U.S. federal income tax situation.

The Code contains rules governing “Passive Foreign Investment Companies” (“PFIC”) which can have significant tax effects on U.S. Holders of foreign corporations. Section 1297 of the Code defines a PFIC as a corporation that is not formed in the U.S. and, for any taxable year, either (i) 75% or more of its gross income is “passive income” or (ii) the average percentage, by fair market value (or, if the corporation is not publicly traded and either is a controlled foreign corporation or makes an election, by adjusted tax basis), of its assets that produce or are held for the production of “passive income” is 50% or more. ”Passive income” includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions. However, gains resulting from commodities transactions are generally excluded from the definition of passive income if “substantially all” of a merchant’s, producer’s or handler’s business is as an active merchant, producer or handler of such commodities.

For purposes of the PFIC income test and the assets test, if a foreign corporation owns (directly or indirectly) at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, such foreign corporation shall be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation, and (b) received directly its proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. Also, for purposes of such PFIC tests, passive income does not include any interest, dividends, rents or royalties that are received or accrued from a “related” person to the extent such amount is properly allocable to the income of such related person which is not passive income. For these purposes, a person is related with respect to a foreign corporation if such person “controls” the foreign corporation or is controlled by the foreign corporation or by the same persons that control the foreign corporation. For these purposes, “control” means ownership, directly or indirectly, of stock possessing more than 50% of the total voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or of the total value of stock of a corporation.

U.S. Holders owning common shares of a PFIC are subject to the highest rate of tax on ordinary income in effect for the applicable taxable year and to an interest charge based on the value of deferral of tax for the period during which the common shares of the PFIC are owned with respect to certain “excess distributions” on and dispositions of PFIC stock under Section 1291 of the Code. However, if the U.S. Holder makes a timely election to treat a PFIC as a qualified electing fund (“QEF”) with respect to such shareholder’s interest therein, the above-described rules generally will not apply. Instead, the electing U.S. Holder would include annually in his gross income his pro rata share of the PFIC’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain regardless of whether such income or gain was actually distributed. A U.S. Holder of a QEF can, however, elect to defer the payment of U.S. federal income tax on such income inclusions. In addition, subject to certain limitations, U.S. Holders owning, actually or constructively, marketable (as specifically defined) stock in a PFIC will be permitted to elect to mark that stock to market annually, rather than be subject to the tax regime of Section 1291 of Code as described above. Amounts included in or deducted from income under this alternative (and actual gains and losses realized upon disposition, subject to certain limitations) will be treated as ordinary gains or losses.

The Company believes that it was not a PFIC for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and does not believe that it will be a PFIC for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. There can be no assurance that the Company’s determination concerning its PFIC status will not be challenged by the IRS, or that it will be able to satisfy record keeping requirements that will be imposed on QEFs in the event that it qualifies as a PFIC.

The Chief Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Financial Officer has concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that all information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rule and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, primarily due to the Company’s minimal financial staff which prevents us from segregating duties, which management believes is a material weakness in our internal controls and procedures. We intend to address such weakness and work with our outside advisors to improve our controls and procedures as and when the circumstances of the Company permit this.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by the Chief Executive Officer, who is also the Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Forward looking statements regarding the effectiveness of internal controls during future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Management completed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) as of June 30, 2011, using the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) framework as contemplated by Rule 13a-15(c). Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that it did not have effective internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2011. The Company’s assessment of the effectiveness of the ICFR at June 30, 2011 identified certain material weaknesses as of that date.

1.	Weakness: It is not possible to adequately segregate incompatible duties among the officers of the Company, because the Company only has one executive management position--Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer--which are both fulfilled by one person.

	Remediation: Appoint a separate Chief Financial Officer, in addition to the current Chief Executive Officer, to formally segregate the duties of maintaining accounting records and preparing financial statements, from the executive duties of the current officer, when financially possible for the Company to do so.

2.	Weakness: The Company is small, with only one officer (who is also a director), thereby creating a risk of override of existing controls by management.

	Remediation: Appoint a separate Chief Financial Officer for expenditures and other dispositions of assets.

3.	Weakness: The Company maintains limited audit evidence in documentary form which is used to test the operating effectiveness of control activities.

	Remediation: Increase the documentation of expenditures and receipts, under the joint supervision of the newly appointed Chief Financial Officer, and the Chief Executive Officer, to insure all receipts and third-party services conform to contract terms, and maintain adequate documents to the extent feasible and reasonable.

As disclosed above, in fiscal 2011, the Company completed its assessment of its ICFR in place for the year ended June 30, 2011, using the COSO framework. Although the assessment was completed, there were no changes in the ICFR during the 2011 fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s ICFR.

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the Company’s financial reporting procedures, internal controls, and the performance of the Company’s external auditors. The functions of the Audit Committee also include selecting, appointing, retaining, compensating and overseeing our independent auditors, deciding upon and approving in advance the scope of audit and non-audit assignments and related fees, reviewing accounting principles we use in financial reporting, and reviewing the adequacy of our internal control procedures, including the internal audit function. The committee is also responsible for reviewing the annual financial statements prior to their approval by the Board of Directors.

The Board has only one Director, Oliver Xing, and has not established a formal Audit Committee and does not presently has a financial expert as defined in relevant SEC rules. However, the Company will try to remedy the situation by seeking a qualified financial expert who can also be regarded as an independent director as soon as financial possible or an opportunity arises for recruiting such a financial expert.

The Company accrued $11,000 audit fees to MSCM LLP, Chartered Accountants during the fiscal year ended at June 30, 2011 (2010 – $12,074). Audit fees consist of audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

The Audit Committee’s policy is to approve all audit and audit-related services. Permissible non-audit services are pre-approved according to fee amount threshold. Permissible non-audit services may include tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to an initial estimated budget. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ontario Solar Energy Corporation (the "Company") as at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, these financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has accumulated losses, and is still developing its planned principal operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in this regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

			June 30		June 30
			2011		2010
Assets
Current assets
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	278,500	$	293,865
	Accounts receivable		150,000		-
	Tax receivable		357		357

Total current assets			428,857		294,222

Total assets		$	428,857	$	294,222

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Current liabilities
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	11,000	$	-
	Loans payable- related party		59,565		3,358

Total current liabilities			70,565		3,358

Stockholders’ equity

	Common stock, unlimited number of shares authorized without par value, 11,541,666 issued and outstanding		414,049		414,049
	Accumulated deficit during the development period		(55,757)		(123,185)

			358,292		290,864

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	428,857	$	294,222

							Period from
							Inception on
							September 3,
			Year ended		Year ended		2009 through
			June 30,		June 30,		to June 30,
			2011		2010		2011

Revenue		$	164,975	$	-	$	164,975

Operating expenses
	Bank service charge		441		99		540
	Management fees		24,000		-		24,000
	Legal fees		10,235		15,000		25,235
	Audit and accounting fees		11,000		67,074		78,074
	Interest income		(41)				(41)
	General and administrative expenses		51,871		41,053		92,924

Total operating expenses			97,547		123,185		220,732

Net income (loss) for the period		$	67,428	$	(123,185)	$	(55,757)

Income (loss) per common stock
	- Basic and diluted	$	0.01	$	(0.02)	$	N/A

Weighted average common share outstanding
	- Basic and diluted		11,541,666		7,151,077		N/A

								Period from
								Inception on
								September 3,
				Year ended		Year ended		2009, through
				June 30,		June 30,		to June 30,
				2011		2010		2011

Cash flows from operating activities
	Net income (loss) for the period		$	67,428	$	(123,185)	$	55,757
	Item not affecting cash
		Shares issued for services		-		100,000		100,000
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities
		Increase in accounts receivable		(150,000)		-		(150,000)
		Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		11,000		-		11,000
		Increase in tax receivable		-		(357)		(357)

	Net cash used in operating activities			(71,572)		(23,542)		(95,114)

Cash flows from financing activities
	Increase in payable to related party			56,207		3,358		59,565
	Proceeds from issuance of common stock			-		314,049		314,049

	Net cash provided by financing activities			56,207		317,407		373,614

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents				(15,365)		293,865		278,500

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period				293,865		-		-

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period			$	278,500	$	293,865	$	278,500

								Total
		Common Stock				Accumulated		stockholders’
		Shares		Amount		deficit		equity

Balance, September 3, 2009		-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Shares issued for services,
	$0.01 per share	10,000,000		100,000		-		100,000

Shares issued for cash,
	$0.20 per share	1,475,000		295,000		-		295,000

Shares issued for cash,
	$0.29 per share	66,666		19,049		-		19,049

Net loss for the period		-		-		(123,185)		(123,185)

Balance, June 30, 2010		11,541,666		414,049		(123,185)		290,864

Net income for the period		-		-		67,428		67,428

Balance, June 30, 2011		11,541,666	$	414,049	$	(55,757)	$	358,292

Ontario Solar Energy Corporation (“the Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada on September 3, 2009. The Company is in the development stage as defined under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) codification 915 “Development Stage Entities” and it intends to commence business operations by providing consulting services to solar energy developers in Ontario, Canada. The Company has only generated $164,975 in revenue to date and consequently its operations are subject to all risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise.

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and are presented in US dollars. The financial statements reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary in order to make the financial statements not misleading.

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred income for the year ended June 30, 2011 of $67,428 (June 30, 2010 – loss of $123,185), resulting in an accumulated deficit of $55,757 from inception on September 3, 2009 to June 30, 2011, further losses are anticipated in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and loans from director and/or private placements of common stock.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Financial statement items subject to significant management judgment include revenue recognition; the completeness of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and allowance for doubtful accounts. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions are reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances, actual results may differ.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB 101”) as modified by Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (codified within ASC Topic 605). Under SAB 101, revenue is recognized at the point of passage to the customer of title and risk of loss, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. For consulting services, revenue is recognized as services are provided.

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Share-Based Payment” (“ASC 718”). Under ASC 718, the Company recognizes compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions in the financial statements based on the fair value of the equity (or liability) instruments issued over the period that an employee is expected to provide service in exchange for the award, based on the vesting terms of the specific stock compensation awards. Stock issued to non-employees is valued based on the fair value of the services received or the fair value of the stock given up.

The Company accounts for its income taxes under the liability method specified by ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the effective tax rates which will be in effect when these differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by ASC 740 to allow recognition of such an asset.

Fair value is defined under FASB ASC Topic 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or the most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value. The levels are as follows:

Level 2 -

Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market data or substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and loans payable due to related party. All of these items were determined to be Level 1 fair value measurements. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and loans payable due to related party approximate their respective fair values because of the short maturities of these instruments.

The Company has adopted ASC Topic 830, “Reporting Comprehensive Income (Loss)” (“ASC 830”), which establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income (loss), its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined to include all changes in equity (shareholders’ deficiency) except those resulting from investments by or distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, ASC 830 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under the current accounting standards as a component of comprehensive income (loss) be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. ASC 830 requires that items be included in other comprehensive income (loss) according to their nature, such as: foreign currency items, change in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and unrealized gains and losses on certain debt and equity securities. Comprehensive income (loss) is displayed in the statements of stockholders’ equity and in the balance sheets as a component of stockholders’ equity. The adoption of ASC 830 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and operating results.

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, (ASC Topic – 260) "Earnings per Share". SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, - Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2009-13) (codified within ASC Topic 605). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2009-13 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06) (codified within ASC Topic 820). ASU 2010-06 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 157. ASU 2010-16 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect these requirements will have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-13, - Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2010-13) (codified within ASC Topic 718). ASU 2010-13 clarifies that a share-based payment award having an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trade is not deemed to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition, and, thus, such an award should not be classified as a liability, if it otherwise qualifies for equity classification. ASU 2010-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-13 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, - Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2010-17) (codified within ASC Topic 605). ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on use of the milestone method of recognizing revenue for research and development arrangements under which consideration to be received by the vendor is contingent upon the achievement of certain milestones. The guidance addresses the criteria for recognizing revenue tied to research and development efforts that often deal with completion of a phase of a drug study or achievement of a specific result in a research project. Authoritative guidance on the use of the milestone method did not previously exist. ASU 2010-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-17 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, - Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2010-29) (codified within ASC Topic 805). ASU 2010-29 requires that a public entity that presents comparative financial statements must disclose the revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior annual reporting period. Furthermore, ASU 2010-29 requires public entities to provide a description of the nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to business combination(s) that are included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-29 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, - Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) (ASU 2011-04) (codified within ASC Topic 820). ASU 2011-04 gives value the same meaning between U.S. GAAP and IFRS and improves consistency of disclosures relating to fair value. ASU 2011-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (ASC Topic – 740) as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC Topic – 740, the Company is required to compute tax assets benefits for net operating losses carried forward. Potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in the future years.

As at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. Management does not believe unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within twelve months of the reporting date. Interest and penalties related to income tax matters are recognized in income tax expenses. As of June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 there is no accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $55,757 (June 30, 2010 – $123,185) that may be available to reduce future years' taxable income through 2030. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

During the period from inception to June 30, 2011, the President has taken initiative to organize, source, secure funding for the Company, provide consulting and management services to the Company and provide necessary office space for the Company. The Company has booked related party transactions of professional fees of $Nil (June 30, 2010- $60,000), general and administrative fees of $51,871 (June 30, 2010 – $40,000) and management fee of $24,000 (June 30, 2010 - $Nil). $100,000 of these related party transaction fees incurred in the period of September 3, 2009 to June 30, 2010 were settled by the Company by issuing to the President and parties related to the President 10,000,000 common shares at $0.01 per common share in the fiscal year ending at June 30, 2010.

Exhibit No.	Document Description

3.1*	Articles of Incorporation
3.2*	Bylaws
5.1*	Legal Opinion
8.1*	Tax Opinion
23.1*	Consent of MSCM,LLP, Chartered Accountants
23.2*	Consent of The Law Office of Conrad C. Lysiak, P.S.
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

* Incorporated by reference to our Form F-1 filed on March 3, 2010.

Exhibit No.	Document Description

3.1*	Articles of Incorporation
3.2*	Bylaws
5.1*	Legal Opinion
8.1*	Tax Opinion
23.1*	Consent of MSCM,LLP, Chartered Accountants
23.2*	Consent of The Law Office of Conrad C. Lysiak, P.S.
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

* Incorporated by reference to our Form F-1 filed on March 3, 2010.

	255 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 203
Province of Ontario, Canada	Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3B 3H9
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:	Securities registered pursuant to section 15(d) of the Act:
NONE	COMMON STOCK

*	cost to start-up and operate new start-up business
*	marketing costs
*	increased personnel and office costs
*	customer acquisition costs
*	legal and accounting costs

		Index

	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
	Balance Sheet	F-2
	Statements of Operations	F-3
	Statements of Cash Flows	F-4
	Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-5
	Notes to the Financial Statements	F-6

	ONTARIO SOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION
	(the “Registrant”)

	BY:	OLIVER XING
		Oliver Xing
		President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and sole member of the Board of Directors

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO ___________

	Large Accelerated Filer	[ ]	Accelerated Filer	[ ]
	Non-accelerated Filer	[X]

Name	Business Address	Position
Oliver Xing	255 Duncan Mill Road	Chief Executive Officer,
	Suite 203	President, Secretary
	Toronto, Ontario	Chief Financial Officer
	Canada M3B 3H9	Director

*	Oliver Xing, our sole officer and director currently holds 100% of the voting shares of Early Bird Capital Corporation.

*	1547698 Ontario Limited is owned by He Zheng who is the wife of Oliver Xing our president. He Zheng currently holds 100% of the voting shares of 1547698 Ontario Limited.