UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to            

Commission file number: 000-54025

Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	35-2379633
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4390 Davisville Road, Hatboro, Pennsylvania	19040
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(215) 682-7400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x     No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer [  ]	Accelerated Filer [X ]
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]	Smaller Reporting Company [  ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  o    No  x

As of November 1, 2012, there were 12,420,137 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.

Table of Contents

		Page No.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Consolidated Statements of Condition at September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)	7
	Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	45
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	45
Part II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	45
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	45
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	46
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	46
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	46
Item 5.	Other Information	46
Item 6.	Exhibits	46
Signatures

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Condition

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	120	$	734
Interest-earning demand deposits in other banks	14,959		6,852
Total cash and cash equivalents	15,079		7,586
Investment securities available-for-sale	12,507		23,106
Mortgage related securities available-for-sale	285,726		225,664
Mortgage related securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $32,958 at September 30, 2012 and $41,758 at December 31, 2011)	31,651		41,074
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $11,220 at September 30, 2012 and $12,075 at December 31, 2011	673,701		670,572
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost	7,407		8,074
Bank-owned life insurance	13,960		13,606
Premises and equipment, net	10,486		10,431
Assets acquired through foreclosure	7,646		2,423
Real estate held for investment	1,620		1,620
Accrued interest receivable	3,443		4,578
Mortgage servicing rights, net	199		316
Deferred tax asset, net	1,292		1,682
Other assets	6,516		5,131
Total Assets	$	1,071,233	$	1,015,863
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Deposits	$	703,133	$	676,594
Short-term borrowings	51,300		8,500
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	95,000		88,278
Other borrowed funds	30,000		50,000
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance	1,096		1,736
Accrued interest payable	345		418
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	6,743		2,145
Total Liabilities	887,617		827,671
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock ($.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011)	-		-
Common stock ($.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 12,447,637 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and 13,037,310 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011)	146		146
Additional paid-in capital	135,857		134,871
Treasury stock, at cost (2,157,800 shares at September 30, 2012 and 1,524,900 shares at December 31, 2011)	(28,307)		(19,822)
Common stock acquired by benefit plans	(10,387)		(11,541)
Retained earnings	79,645		77,971
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net	6,662		6,567
Total Stockholders’ Equity	183,616		188,192
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	1,071,233	$	1,015,863

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans	$	8,582	$	9,021	$	25,792	$	26,579
Interest on mortgage related securities	1,888		2,425		5,822		7,651
Interest on investment securities available-for-sale
Taxable	60		116		231		380
Nontaxable	1		28		34		165
Other interest income	-		16		5		69
Total Interest Income	10,531		11,606		31,884		34,844
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	1,578		2,099		4,986		6,769
Short-term borrowings	16		2		26		2
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	450		1,007		1,892		3,314
Other borrowed funds	254		437		1,096		1,296
Total Interest Expense	2,298		3,545		8,000		11,381
Net Interest Income	8,233		8,061		23,884		23,463
Provision for loan losses	470		1,034		3,036		2,909
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses	7,763		7,027		20,848		20,554
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges and other fee income	364		428		1,138		1,207
Net gain on sale of assets acquired through foreclosure	8		57		135		77
Impairment loss on real estate held for investment	-		(110)		-		(110)
Income on bank-owned life insurance	117		119		354		349
Other	248		133		544		222
Total other-than-temporary impairment loss	-		(206)		-		(407)
Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)	-		46		-		46
Net other-than-temporary impairment loss	-		(160)		-		(361)
Net gains on sale of investment securities	-		-		2,340		-
Net investment securities gains (losses)	-		(160)		2,340		(361)
Total Noninterest Income	737		467		4,511		1,384
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries, benefits and other compensation	3,458		3,297		10,150		9,678
Occupancy expense	415		457		1,294		1,388
Furniture and equipment expense	119		107		409		314
Data processing costs	441		439		1,359		1,277
Professional fees	369		410		1,327		1,245
Marketing expense	65		95		217		240
FDIC premiums	199		170		581		682
Assets acquired through foreclosure expense	962		315		1,115		459
Loss on extinguishment of debt	-		-		3,018		-
Other	370		400		1,267		1,185
Total Noninterest Expense	6,398		5,690		20,737		16,468
Income Before Income Taxes	2,102		1,804		4,622		5,470
Income tax provision	666		572		1,460		1,735
Net Income	$	1,436	$	1,232	$	3,162	$	3,735
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.12	$	0.09	$	0.27	$	0.28
Diluted	$	0.12	$	0.09	$	0.27	$	0.28

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income	$	1,436	$	1,232	$	3,162	$	3,735
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net of tax expense (benefit) of $900 and ($45) for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and $830 and $632 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively	1,707		(57)		1,605		1,142
Non-credit related unrealized loss on other-than temporary impaired securities, net of tax (benefit) of $16 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011	-		(30)		-		(30)
Reclassification adjustments for net investment securities gains included in net income, net of tax expense of $864 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012	-		-		(1,563)		-
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net income for other-than temporary impaired investment sold, net of tax (benefit) of ($34) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012	-		-		53		-
Other comprehensive income (loss)	1,707		(87)		95		1,112
Comprehensive income	$	3,143	$	1,145	$	3,257	$	4,847

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

										Common								Accumulated
				Additional						Stock								Other
	Common			Paid in		Treasury				Acquired by				Retained				Comprehensive		Total
	Stock			Capital		Stock				Benefit Plans				Earnings				Income, net		Equity
BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2010	$	145		$  133,997		$		-		$		(9,283	)	$		74,307		$	6,538	$  205,704
Purchase of treasury stock, net	-			-		(10,398			)	-				-				-		(10,398	)
Purchase of common stock for equity incentive plan	-			-		-				(3,474			)	-				-		(3,474	)
Stock based compensation expense	-			759		-				-				-				-		759
Unallocated ESOP shares committed to employees	-			166		-				468				-				-		634
Issuance of stock for vested equity awards	-			(543	)	-				590				(47			)	-		-
Common stock issued for exercise of vested stock options	1			161		-				-				-				-		162
Dividends paid ($0.06 per share)	-			-		-				-				(863			)	-		(863	)
Net income	-			-		-				-				3,735				-		3,735
Other comprehensive income	-			-		-				-				-				1,112		1,112
BALANCE - SEPTEMBER 30, 2011	$	146		$  134,540		$	(10,398		)	$		(11,699	)	$		77,132		$	7,650	$  197,371
										Common								Accumulated
				Additional						Stock								Other
	Common			Paid in		Treasury				Acquired by				Retained				Comprehensive		Total
	Stock			Capital		Stock				Benefit Plans				Earnings				Income, net		Equity
BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2011	$		146	$  134,871		$ (19,822			)	$	(11,541		)	$	77,971			$	6,567	$  188,192
Purchase of treasury stock, net	-			-		(8,485			)	-				-				-		(8,485	)
Stock based compensation expense	-			873		-				-				-				-		873
Unallocated ESOP shares committed to employees	-			197		-				468				-				-		665
Issuance of stock for vested equity awards	-			(643	)	-				686				(43			)	-		-
Common stock issued for exercise of vested stock options	-			472		-				-				-				-		472
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock	-			87		-				-				-				-		87
Dividends paid ($0.12 per share)	-			-		-				-				(1,445			)	-		(1,445	)
Net income	-			-		-				-				3,162				-		3,162
Other comprehensive income	-			-		-				-				-				95		95
BALANCE - SEPTEMBER 30, 2012	$		146	$  135,857		$ (28,307			)	$	(10,387		)	$	79,645			$	6,662	$  183,616

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	3,162		$	3,735
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	3,036			2,909
Valuation adjustment for other real estate owned	850			410
Change in fair value of financial assets acquired from debtors	82			-
Impairment loss on real estate held for investment	-			110
Depreciation	623			509
Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts	2,104			2,474
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes	390			(94		)
Stock compensation from benefit plans	1,538			1,394
Net gain on sale of assets acquired through foreclosure	(135		)	(77		)
Net gains on sales of investment securities	(2,340		)	-
Net other-than-temporary impairment loss	-			361
Additions to assets acquired through foreclosure	(317		)	-
Income on bank-owned life insurance	(354		)	(349		)
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock	(87		)	-
Decrease in mortgage servicing rights, net	117			119
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets	(159		)	1,561
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	4,613			(317		)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	13,123			12,745
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Investment securities - available-for-sale:
Purchases	(5,269		)	-
Proceeds from sales	6,157			-
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments	9,866			7,900
Mortgage related securities - available-for-sale:
Purchases	(180,522		)	(35,031		)
Proceeds from sales	69,067			-
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments	51,957			55,055
Mortgage related securities - held-to-maturity:
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments	9,015			5,808
Net decrease in loans	7,815			16,406
Purchases of loans and loan participations	(21,418		)	(28,244		)
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank stock	667			1,414
Purchases of premises and equipment	(678		)	(365		)
Proceeds from sales and payments on assets acquired through foreclosure	1,663			1,435
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities	(51,680		)	24,378
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits	26,539			(45,241		)
Decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance	(640		)	(787		)
Principal payments on other borrowed funds	(20,000		)	-
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank Advances	45,000			-
Principal payments on Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(38,278		)	(33,377		)
Net increase in short-term borrowings	42,800			24,000
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock	87			-
Common stock issued for exercise of stock options	472			162
Acquisition of common stock for equity incentive plan	-			(3,474		)
Purchase of treasury stock	(8,485		)	(10,398		)
Cash dividends paid	(1,445		)	(863		)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities	46,050			(69,978		)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	7,493			(32,855		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning	7,586			38,314
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending	$	15,079		$	5,459
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid	$	8,073		$	11,526
Income taxes paid	$	1,548		$	1,700
Transfers of loans to assets acquired through foreclosure	$	7,366		$	1,479
Net charge-offs	$	3,891		$	2,771

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 - PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND PRESENTATION

Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (the “Bancorp”) is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated in March 2010 to be the successor corporation to old Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (“Old Fox Chase Bancorp”), the federal corporation and the former stock holding company for Fox Chase Bank (the “Bank”), upon completion of the mutual-to-stock conversion of Fox Chase MHC, the former mutual holding company for Fox Chase Bank.

The Bancorp’s primary business is holding the common stock of the Bank and making two loans to the ESOP. The Bancorp is authorized to pursue other business activities permissible by laws and regulations for savings and loan holding companies.

The Bancorp and the Bank (collectively referred to as the “Company”) provide a wide variety of financial products and services to individuals and businesses through the Bank’s eleven branches in Philadelphia, Richboro, Willow Grove, Warminster, Lahaska, Hatboro, Media and West Chester, Pennsylvania, and Ocean City, Marmora and Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey.  The operations of the Company are managed as a single business segment.  The Company competes with other financial institutions and other companies that provide financial services.  The Bank also owns approximately 45% of Philadelphia Mortgage Advisors (“PMA”), a mortgage banker located in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania and Ocean City, New Jersey.

The Company is subject to regulations of certain federal banking agencies.  These regulations can and do change significantly from period to period.  The Company also undergoes periodic examinations by regulatory agencies which may subject them to further changes with respect to asset valuations, amounts of required loan loss allowances and operating restrictions resulting from the regulators’ judgments based on information available to them at the time of their examinations.  Pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), effective July 21, 2011, the regulation and supervision of federal savings institutions, such as the Bank, was transferred from the Office of Thrift Supervision to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the agency that regulates national banks.  As a result, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has assumed primary responsibility for examining the Bank and implementing and enforcing many of the laws and regulations applicable to federal savings associations.  In addition, pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, effective July 21, 2011, savings and loan holding companies, such as the Bancorp, are regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Bancorp and the Bank. The Bank’s operations include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Fox Chase Financial, Inc., Fox Chase Service Corporation, 104 S. Oakland Ave., LLC and Davisville Associates, LLC.  Fox Chase Financial Inc. is a Delaware-chartered investment holding company and its sole purpose is to manage and hold investment securities.  Fox Chase Service Corporation is a Pennsylvania chartered company and its purposes are to facilitate the Bank’s investment in PMA and, for regulatory purposes, to hold commercial loans.  At September 30, 2012, Fox Chase Service Corporation held $20.0 million in commercial loans.  104 S. Oakland Ave., LLC is a New Jersey-chartered limited liability company formed to secure, manage and hold foreclosed real estate.  Davisville Associates, LLC is a Pennsylvania-chartered limited liability company formed to secure, manage and hold foreclosed real estate.  All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior period amounts are reclassified, when necessary, to conform with the current year’s presentation.

During 2012 and 2011, the Bank engaged in certain business activities with PMA.  These activities included providing a warehouse line of credit to PMA, as well as acquiring residential mortgage and home equity loans from PMA. The Bank recorded interest income from PMA on the warehouse line of $301,000 and $142,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as well as loan satisfaction fees, which are recorded in service charges and other fee income, from PMA of $48,000 and $37,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  In addition, the Bank acquired total loans from PMA of $13.5 million and $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which includes the cost of the loans.   During September 2010, the Bank provided PMA a term loan in the amount of $1.2 million, which was secured by a residential property owned by PMA.  The loan was paid off during the second quarter of 2011.  The Bank recorded interest income on the term loan of $25,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

8

NOTE 1 - PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)

The Company follows accounting principles and reporting practices that are in compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclose contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation and realizability of deferred tax assets, the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment and the valuation of investment securities and assets acquired through foreclosure.

These interim financial statements do not contain all necessary disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements and therefore should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2012.   These financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments which management believes were necessary in order to conform to GAAP.  The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012 or any other period.

During the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the Company acquired a total of four life insurance policies from debtors in exchange for full satisfaction of debt. As a result, the Company has changed the caption on the consolidated statement of condition from other real estate owned to assets acquired through foreclosure beginning with the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.  Below is the significant accounting policy for assets acquired through foreclosure.

Assets Acquired through Foreclosure

Assets acquired through foreclosure consists of other real estate owned and financial assets acquired from debtors.  These assets are obtained through foreclosure, by a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, in-substance foreclosure or in exchange for satisfaction of debt.

Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated selling costs. Costs related to the development or improvement of an acquired property are capitalized. Holding costs and declines in carrying value after acquisition are recorded as assets acquired through foreclosure expense in the consolidated statements of operations.  As of September 30, 2012, the Company held $5.0 million of other real estate owned.

Financial assets acquired from debtors are carried at fair value under the fair value option in accordance with FASB ASC 825 “Financial Instruments”.  Increases or decreases in fair value after acquisition are recorded as assets acquired through foreclosure expense in the consolidated statements of operations.  As of September 30, 2012, the Company held $2.6 million of financial assets acquired from debtors, consisting of four life insurance policies.

Per Share Information

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock.  Unallocated shares in the ESOP and shares purchased to fund the Bancorp’s Equity Incentive Plans are not included in either basic or diluted earnings per share.

9

NOTE 1 - PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(Unaudited)
Net income	$	1,436,000	$	1,232,000	$	3,162,000	$	3,735,000
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (1)	12,549,453		14,059,538		12,699,390		14,384,818
Average common stock acquired by stock benefit plans:
ESOP shares unallocated	(643,539)		(708,600)		(659,705)		(724,703)
Shares purchased by trust	(370,768)		(263,356)		(383,014)		(200,060)
Weighted-average common shares used to calculate basic earnings per share	11,535,146		13,087,582		11,656,671		13,460,055
Dilutive effect of:
Restricted stock awards	45,074		35,172		36,675		35,694
Stock option awards	138,088		52,935		102,190		49,936
Weighted-average common shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share	11,718,308		13,175,689		11,795,536		13,545,685
Earnings per share-basic	$	0.12	$	0.09	$	0.27	$	0.28
Earnings per share-diluted	$	0.12	$	0.09	$	0.27	$	0.28
Outstanding common stock equivalents having no dilutive effect	826,441		832,143		870,738		834,620

(1) Excludes treasury stock.

10

NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE RELATED SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
				Gross		Gross
	Amortized			Unrealized		Unrealized				OTTI			Fair
	Cost			Gains		Losses				in AOCI			Value
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$		300	$	15	$		-		$	-		$	315
State and political subdivisions	-			-		-				-			-
Corporate securities	12,235			90		(133			)	-			12,192
	12,535			105		(133			)	-			12,507
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	6,367			98		-				-			6,465
Agency residential mortgage related securities	269,010			10,251		-				-			279,261
Total mortgage related securities	275,377			10,349		-				-			285,726
Total available-for-sale securities	$		287,912	$	10,454	$		(133	)	$	-		$	298,233
Held-to-Maturity Securities:
Agency residential mortgage related securities	$		31,651	$	1,307	$		-		$	-		$	32,958
Total mortgage related securities	31,651			1,307		-				-			32,958
Total held-to-maturity securities	$		31,651	$	1,307	$		-		$	-		$	32,958
	December 31, 2011
				Gross		Gross
	Amortized			Unrealized		Unrealized				OTTI			Fair
	Cost			Gains		Losses				in AOCI			Value
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	6,424		$	90	$	-			$	-		$	6,514
State and political subdivisions	1,865			8		-				-			1,873
Corporate securities	15,007			16		(304			)	-			14,719
	23,296			114		(304			)	-			23,106
Private label residential mortgage related security	164			4		-				(46		)	122
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	8,799			107		-				-			8,906
Agency residential mortgage related securities	206,285			10,357		(6			)	-			216,636
Total mortgage related securities	215,248			10,468		(6			)	(46		)	225,664
Total available-for-sale securities	$	238,544		$	10,582	$	(310		)	$	(46	)	$	248,770
Held-to-Maturity Securities:
Agency residential mortgage related securities	$	41,074		$	684	$	-			$	-		$	41,758
Total mortgage related securities	41,074			684		-				-			41,758
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	41,074		$	684	$	-			$	-		$	41,758

11

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE RELATED SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The following tables show gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses		Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-
State and political subdivisions	-		-		-		-			-		-
Corporate securities	-		-		2,867		(133		)	2,867		(133		)
	-		-		2,867		(133		)	2,867		(133		)
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	-		-		-		-			-		-
Agency residential mortgage related securities	-		-		-		-			-		-
Total mortgage related securities	-		-		-		-			-		-
Total available-for-sale securities	$	-	$	-	$	2,867	$	(133	)	$	2,867	$	(133	)
Held-to-Maturity Securities:
Agency residential mortgage related securities	-		-		-		-			-		-
Total mortgage related securities	-		-		-		-			-		-
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	-	$	-	$	2,867	$	(133	)	$	2,867	$	(133	)

	December 31, 2011
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
								Unrealized
								Losses
								Plus
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		OTTI			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		in AOCI			Value		Losses
	(In Thousands)
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-
State and political subdivisions	-		-			-		-			-		-
Corporate securities	4,799		(182		)	2,878		(122		)	7,677		(304		)
	4,799		(182		)	2,878		(122		)	7,677		(304		)
Private label residential mortgage related security	-		-			122		(42		)	122		(42		)
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	-		-			-		-			-		-
Agency residential mortgage related securities	1,538		(6		)	-		-			1,538		(6		)
Total mortgage related securities	1,538		(6		)	122		(42		)	1,660		(48		)
Total available-for-sale securities	$	6,337	$	(188	)	$	3,000	$	(164	)	$	9,337	$	(352	)
Held-to-Maturity Securities:
Agency residential mortgage related securities	-		-			-		-			-		-
Total mortgage related securities	-		-			-		-			-		-
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	6,337	$	(188	)	$	3,000	$	(164	)	$	9,337	$	(352	)

12

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE RELATED SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company sold (1) mortgage related securities with an amortized cost of $66.6 million and recognized gross gains of $2.4 million, (2) a private label residential mortgage related security with an amortized cost of $157,000 and recognized a loss of $87,000 and (3) two obligations of U.S. government agencies with an amortized cost of $6.1 million and recognized a gain of $64,000.

As of September 30, 2012, the Company held three private label CMBS with an amortized cost of $6.4 million. These securities had a net unrealized gain of $98,000 at September 30, 2012 and all individual securities were held at an unrealized gain. As of December 31, 2011, the Company held three private label CMBS with an amortized cost of $8.8 million. These securities had a net unrealized gain of $107,000 at December 31, 2011 and all individual securities were held at an unrealized gain.

The Company evaluates current characteristics of each of these private label securities such as delinquency and foreclosure levels, credit enhancement, projected losses, coverage and actual and projected cash flows, on a quarterly basis. It is possible that the underlying collateral of these securities will perform worse than current expectations, which may lead to adverse changes in cash flows on these securities and potential future other-than-temporary impairment losses. Events that may trigger material declines in fair values for these securities in the future would include but are not limited to deterioration of credit metrics, significantly higher levels of default and severity of loss on the underlying collateral, deteriorating credit enhancement and loss coverage ratios, or further illiquidity.

Securities that have been impaired greater than twelve months as of September 30, 2012 consist of one corporate security with a fair value of $2.9 million with a rating of “Baa2”, with an unrealized loss of $133,000.  As of September 30, 2012, this was the only security in an unrealized loss position.

13

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE RELATED SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The following schedules provide a summary of the components of net investment securities gains (losses) in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 (Unaudited):													Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (Unaudited):
					Other-than-														Other-than-
	Gross		Gross		Temporary			Portion of						Gross		Gross			Temporary			Portion of
	Realized		Realized		Impairment			OTTI		Net Gains				Realized		Realized			Impairment			OTTI		Net Gains
	Gains		Losses		Losses			in OCI		(Losses)				Gains		Losses			Losses			in OCI		(Losses)
	(in thousands)													(in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-			$	64	$	-		$	-		$	-	$		64
State and political subdivisions	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
Corporate securities	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
	-		-		-			-		-				64		-			-			-		64
Private label residential mortgage related security	-		-		-			-		-				-		(87		)	-			-		(87				)
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
Agency residential mortgage related securities	-		-		-			-		-				2,363		-			-			-		2,363
Total mortgage related securities	-		-		-			-		-				2,363		(87		)	-			-		2,276
Total securities available-for-sale	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-			$	2,427	$	(87	)	$	-		$	-	$		2,340
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 (Unaudited):													Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (Unaudited):
					Other-than-														Other-than-
	Gross		Gross		Temporary			Portion of						Gross		Gross			Temporary			Portion of
	Realized		Realized		Impairment			OTTI		Net Gains				Realized		Realized			Impairment			OTTI		Net Gains
	Gains		Losses		Losses			in OCI		(Losses)				Gains		Losses			Losses			in OCI		(Losses)
	(in thousands)													(in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$		-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-
State and political subdivisions	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
Corporate securities	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
Private label residential mortgage related security	-		-		(206		)	46		(160			)	-		-			(407		)	46		(361			)
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
Agency residential mortgage related securities	-		-		-			-		-				-		-			-			-		-
Total mortgage related securities	-		-		(206		)	46		(160			)	-		-			(407		)	46		(361			)
Total securities available-for-sale	$	-	$	-	$	(206	)	$	46	$		(160	)	$	-	$	-		$	(407	)	$	46	$	(361		)

14

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE RELATED SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by contractual maturity are as follows:

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
Due in one year or less	$	2,034	$	2,059	$	-	$	-
Due after one year through five years	10,501		10,448		-		-
Due after five years through ten years	-		-		-		-
Due after ten years	-		-		-		-
Total mortgage related securities	275,377		285,726		31,651		32,958
	$	287,912	$	298,233	$	31,651	$	32,958
December 31, 2011
Due in one year or less	$	8,022	$	8,013	$	-	$	-
Due after one year through five years	14,072		13,886		-		-
Due after five years through ten years	763		766		-		-
Due after ten years	439		441		-		-
Total mortgage related securities	215,248		225,664		41,074		41,758
	$	238,544	$	248,770	$	41,074	$	41,758

Securities with a carrying value of $8.9 million and $8.1 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

Securities with a carrying value of $39.4 million and $63.2 million, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were used to secure other borrowed funds.   See Note 7.

15

NOTE 3 - LOANS

The composition of net loans at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011 is provided below (in thousands).

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
Real estate loans:
One- to-four family	$	168,201		$	198,669
Multi-family and commercial	352,374			313,060
Construction	19,519			18,243
	540,094			529,972
Consumer loans	34,839			44,667
Commercial and industrial loans	109,520			107,781
Total loans	684,453			682,420
Deferred loan origination cost, net	468			227
Allowance for loan losses	(11,220		)	(12,075		)
Net loans	$	673,701		$	670,572

The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended						Year Ended
	September 30,						December 31,
	2012			2011			2011
	(Unaudited)
Balance, beginning	$	12,075		$	12,443		$	12,443
Provision for loan losses	3,036			2,909			5,734
Loans charged off	(3,952		)	(3,000		)	(6,331		)
Recoveries	61			229			229
Balance, ending	$	11,220		$	12,581		$	12,075

The following tables present changes in the allowance for loan losses by loan segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011:

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)
	One- to Four- Family			Multi-family and Commercial			Construction Loans			Consumer Loans			Commercial and Industrial			Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)
Balance, beginning	$	1,760		$	6,112		$	869		$	455		$	2,657		$	222	$	12,075
Provision for loan losses	228			855			574			1,243			(1		)	137		3,036
Loans charged off	(1,408		)	(887		)	(340		)	(1,317		)	-			-		(3,952		)
Recoveries	4			11			46			-			-			-		61
Balance, ending	$	584		$	6,091		$	1,149		$	381		$	2,656		$	359	$	11,220

16

NOTE 3 - LOANS (CONTINUED)

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
	One- to Four- Family			Multi-family and Commercial			Construction Loans			Consumer Loans			Commercial and Industrial			Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)
Balance, beginning	$	1,990		$	4,624		$	3,260		$	665		$	1,707		$	197	$	12,443
Provision for loan losses	324			2,608			1,010			221			1,546			25		5,734
Loans charged off	(567		)	(1,290		)	(3,445		)	(433		)	(596		)	-		(6,331		)
Recoveries	13			170			44			2			-			-		229
Balance, ending	$	1,760		$	6,112		$	869		$	455		$	2,657		$	222	$	12,075

The following tables set forth the breakdown of impaired loans by loan segment as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)

									Impaired		Impaired
					Other		Total		Loans		Loans
	Nonaccrual		Accruing		Impaired		Impaired		with		without
	Loans		TDRs		Loans		Loans		Allowance		Allowance
	(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family	$	2,010	$	511	$	-	$	2,521	$	2,521	$	-
Multi-family and commercial	3,974		6,817		165		10,956		9,465		1,491
Construction	7,085		-		-		7,085		7,085		-
Consumer loans	4,316		14		-		4,330		475		3,855
Commercial and industrial	-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	17,385	$	7,342	$	165	$	24,892	$	19,546	$	5,346

December 31, 2011

									Impaired		Impaired
					Other		Total		Loans		Loans
	Nonaccrual		Accruing		Impaired		Impaired		with		without
	Loans		TDRs		Loans		Loans		Allowance		Allowance
	(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family	$	6,885	$	307	$	-	$	7,192	$	7,192	$	-
Multi-family and commercial	3,814		6,836		-		10,650		9,570		1,080
Construction	6,372		-		-		6,372		6,372		-
Consumer loans	7		64		6,229		6,300		6,300		-
Commercial and industrial	-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	17,078	$	7,207	$	6,229	$	30,514	$	29,434	$	1,080

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the average recorded investment in impaired loans was $26.9 million and $28.6 million, respectively.  The interest income recognized on these impaired loans was $248,000 and $376,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

At September 30, 2012, six troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), totaling $7.4 million, are excluded from the accruing TDR column above as they are included in the nonaccrual loans. Of this amount, $7.1 million relates to two construction loans.  The Bank has commitments of $1.3 million to lend additional funds related to these construction loans.  Additionally, the Bank had three residential loan TDRs totaling $254,000 and one consumer loan TDR totaling $8,000 which are included in the nonaccrual loans and total impaired loans.

17

NOTE 3 - LOANS (CONTINUED)

At December 31, 2011, two TDRs totaling $5.2 million are excluded from the accruing TDR column as they are included in nonaccrual loans and total impaired loans.

The following table sets forth a summary of the TDR activity for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

TDRs that Defaulted in

TDRs that Defaulted in

Current Quarter that

Current Period that

were Restructured in

were Restructured in

Restructured Current Quarter

the Prior Twelve Months

Restructured Current Period

the Prior Twelve Months

Pre-

Post-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Post-

Modification

Modification

Modification

Modification

Modification

Modification

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Number

Recorded

Recorded

Number

Recorded

Number

Recorded

Recorded

Number

Recorded

of Loans

Investment

Investment

of Loans

Investment

of Loans

Investment

Investment

of Loans

Investment

(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)

Real estate loans:

One- to four-family

-

$

-

$

-

3

$

254

3

$

400

$

400

3

$

254

Multi-family and commercial

-

-

-

-

-

1

519

519

-

-

Construction

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Consumer loans

1

14

14

1

8

1

14

14

1

8

Commercial and industrial

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total

1

$

14

$

14

4

$

262

5

$

933

$

933

4

$

262

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

TDRs that Defaulted in

TDRs that Defaulted in

Current Quarter that

Current Period that

were Restructured in

were Restructured in

Restructured Current Year to Date

the Prior Twelve Months

Restructured Current Year to Date

the Prior Twelve Months

Pre-

Post-

Post-

Pre-

Post-

Post-

Modification

Modification

Modification

Modification

Modification

Modification

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Outstanding

Number

Recorded

Recorded

Number

Recorded

Number

Recorded

Recorded

Number

Recorded

of Loans

Investment

Investment

of Loans

Investment

of Loans

Investment

Investment

of Loans

Investment

(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands, Unaudited)

Real estate loans:

One- to four-family	-	$	-	$	-	-	$	-	-	$	-	$	-	-	$	-
Multi-family and commercial	-	-		-		-	-		1	4,673		4,673		-	-
Construction	-	-		-		1	3,164		-	-		-		1	3,164
Consumer loans	-	-		-		-	-		-	-		-		-	-
Commercial and industrial	-	-		-		-	-		-	-		-		1	600
Total	-	$	-	$	-	1	$	3,164	1	$	4,673	$	4,673	2	$	3,764

The Company may, under certain circumstances, restructure loans as a concession to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulty. TDRs are included in impaired loans. TDRs typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation activities, which, among other activities, could include extension of maturity, rate reductions, payment extension, and/or principal forgiveness.

At September 30, 2012, the Bank had twelve TDRs, totaling $14.7 million, of which $13.8 million were TDRs at December 31, 2011:

·Two construction loans totaling $7.1 million.

·Two multi-family and commercial real estate loans totaling $6.3 million.

·Two residential loans totaling $368,000.

·One consumer loan totaling $8,000.

18

NOTE 3 - LOANS (CONTINUED)

In addition, new TDRs during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, which totaled $925,000 at September 30, 2012, were comprised of the following:

·One multi-family and commercial real estate loan classified, totaling $514,000, which was first classified as a TDR during the three months ended March 31, 2012.  The loan was classified as a TDR as the Bank agreed to restructure the terms of the loan, which included reducing payments to interest only for a period of seven months.

·Three other residential loans, totaling $397,000, which were first classified as TDRs during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as the Bank agreed to modified terms with the borrowers, which included delayed repayment of principal and interest.

·One consumer loan, totaling $14,000, which was first classified as a TDR during the three months ended September 30, 2012.

The following tables set forth the allowance for loan loss for impaired loans and general allowance by loan segment as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)	Allowance for Loan Losses
	Impaired Loans
							Other			Total
	Nonaccrual			Accruing			Impaired			Impaired
	Loans			TDRs			Loans			Loans			General		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family	$		259	$	5		$		-	$		264	$	320	$	584
Multi-family and commercial	240			1,001			12			1,253			4,838		6,091
Construction	821			-			-			821			328		1,149
Consumer loans	115			1			-			116			265		381
Commercial and industrial	-			-			-			-			2,656		2,656
Unallocated	-			-			-			-			359		359
Total allowance for loan losses	$		1,435	$	1,007		$		12	$		2,454	$	8,766	$	11,220
	Allowance for Loan Losses
	Impaired Loans
December 31, 2011							Other			Total
	Nonaccrual			Accruing			Impaired			Impaired
	Loans			TDR’s			Loans			Loans			General		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family	$	1,394		$		3	$	-		$	1,397		$	363	$	1,760
Multi-family and commercial	466			975			-			1,441			4,671		6,112
Construction	565			-			-			565			304		869
Consumer loans	7			7			156			170			285		455
Commercial and industrial	-			-			-			-			2,657		2,657
Unallocated	-			-			-			-			222		222
Total allowance for loan losses	$	2,432		$		985	$	156		$	3,573		$	8,502	$	12,075

19

NOTE 3 - LOANS (CONTINUED)

Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued amounted to $17.4 million at September 30, 2012 and $17.1 million at December 31, 2011. If interest on such loans had been recorded in accordance with contractual terms, interest income would have increased by $1.2 million and $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, respectively. There was $165,000 and $3.9 million of loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. There were $14.7 million and $12.4 million of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively.

The following table sets forth past due loans by segment as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	At September 30,				At December 31,
	2012				2011
	30-59		60-89		30-59		60-89
	Days		Days		Days		Days
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due
	(in thousands)
One- to four-family real estate	$	542	$	459	$	370	$	252
Multi-family and commercial real estate	54		-		-		-
Construction	-		64		-		-
Consumer	104		-		1,097		169
Commercial and industrial	-		-		-		-
Total
	$	700	$	523	$	1,467	$	421

We use six primary classifications for loans: pass, pass watch, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss, of which three classifications are for problem loans: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard loans” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful loans” have the weaknesses of substandard loans with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. A loan classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a loan of the institution is not warranted. We also maintain a “special mention” category, described as loans which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. If we classify an asset as loss, it is recorded as a loan charged off in the current period.

20

NOTE 3 - LOANS (CONTINUED)

The following tables set forth criticized and classified loans by segment as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	At September 30, 2012
	One- to Four-Family Loans		Multi-family and Commercial		Construction Loans		Consumer Loans		Commercial and Industrial		Total
	(In thousands)
Pass and Pass watch	$	166,191	$	332,158	$	12,434	$	30,523	$	106,823	$	648,129
Special mention loans	-		7,342		-		-		1,753		9,095
Substandard loans	2,010		12,874		7,085		4,316		944		27,229
Doubtful loans	-		-		-		-		-		-
Total loans	$	168,201	$	352,374	$	19,519	$	34,839	$	109,520	$	684,453

	At December 31, 2011
	One- to Four-Family Loans		Multi-family and Commercial		Construction Loans		Consumer Loans		Commercial and Industrial		Total
	(In thousands)
Pass and Pass watch	$	191,784	$	285,515	$	11,871	$	38,431	$	102,101	$	629,702
Special mention loans	-		13,226		-		6,229		1,407		20,862
Substandard loans	6,885		14,319		6,372		7		4,273		31,856
Doubtful loans	-		-		-		-		-		-
Total loans	$	198,669	$	313,060	$	18,243	$	44,667	$	107,781	$	682,420

NOTE 4 – DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Interest Rate Swaps

On November 3, 2006, the Company entered an interest rate swap with a current notional amount of $967,000, which is used to hedge a 15-year fixed rate loan that is earning interest at 7.43%. The Company is receiving variable rate payments of one-month LIBOR plus 224 basis points and is paying fixed rate payments of 7.43%.  The swap matures in April 2022 and had a fair value loss position of $214,000 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  The interest rate swap is carried at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”.  The loan is carried at fair value under the fair value option as permitted by FASB ASC 825 “Financial Instruments”.

On October 12, 2011, the Company entered an interest rate swap with a current notional amount of $1.6 million, which is used to hedge a 10-year fixed rate loan that is earning interest at 5.83%. The Company is receiving variable rate payments of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points and is paying fixed rate payments of 5.83%.  The Company designated this relationship as a fair value hedge.  The swap matures in October 2021 and had a fair value loss position of $116,000 and $65,000 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  Hedge ineffectiveness resulted in income of $2,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and a loss of $5,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  The difference between changes in the fair values of interest rate swap agreement and the hedged loan represents hedge ineffectiveness and is recorded in other non-interest income in the consolidated statements of operations.

21

NOTE 4 – DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING (CONTINUED)

Credit Derivatives

We have entered into agreements with a third-party financial institution whereby the financial institution entered into interest rate derivative contracts and foreign currency swap contracts with customers referred to them by us. By the terms of the agreements, the financial institution has recourse to the Company for any exposure created under each swap contract in the event the customer defaults on the swap agreement and the agreement is in a paying position to the third-party financial institution. These transactions represent credit derivatives and are a customary arrangement that allows financial institutions like us to provide access to interest rate and foreign currency swap transactions for our customers without creating the swap ourselves.  The Company records the fair value of credit derivatives in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of condition.   The Company recognizes changes in the fair value of credit derivatives, net of any fees received, as service charges and other fee income in the consolidated statements of operations.

At September 30, 2012, there were three variable-rate to fixed-rate interest rate swap transactions between the third-party financial institution and our customers with a notional amount of $9.8 million, and remaining maturities ranging from 7 to 10 years.  The fair value of the swaps to the customers was a liability of $234,000 as of September 30, 2012 and all swaps were in paying positions to the third-party financial institution.  As of September 30, 2012, the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap credit derivatives was a liability of $30,000. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized income of $34,000 and $36,000, respectively, from interest rate swap credit derivatives.

At September 30, 2012, there were two foreign currency swap transactions between the third-party financial institution and our customers with a notional amount aggregating approximately $530,000, and remaining maturities ranging from 2 to 3 months.  The aggregate fair value of these swaps to the customers was a liability of $9,000 as of September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2012, the fair value of the Company’s credit derivatives was a liability of $1,000.   During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized income of $4,000 and $33,000, respectively, from foreign currency swap credit derivatives.

The maximum potential payments by the Company to the financial institution under these credit derivatives are not estimable as they are contingent on future interest rates and exchange rates, and the agreement does not provide for a limitation of the maximum potential payment amount.

NOTE 5- MORTGAGE SERVICING ACTIVITY

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated statements of condition. The unpaid principal balances of these loans were $38.8 million and $54.8 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $50.0 million at December 31, 2011.

The following summarizes mortgage servicing rights activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands) (unaudited):

					Net
	Servicing		Valuation		Carrying
	Rights		Allowance		Value
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	455	$	(139)	$	316
Reductions	-		(16)		(16)
Amortization	(101)		-		(101)
Balance at September 30, 2012	$	354	$	(155)	$	199
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	579	$	(131)	$	448
Reductions	-		(41)		(41)
Amortization	(78)		-		(78)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	501	$	(172)	$	329

At September 30, 2012, December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) was $199,000, $322,000 and $333,000, respectively.  The fair value at these dates was determined using a third-party valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds and discount rates. Mortgage

22

NOTE 5- MORTGAGE SERVICING ACTIVITY  (CONTINUED)

loan prepayment speed is the annual rate at which borrowers are forecasted to repay their mortgage loan principal and is based on historical experience and current interest rates. The discount rate used to determine the present value of future net servicing income is the required rate of return the market would expect for an asset with similar risk. Both assumptions can, and generally will, change quarterly valuations as market conditions and interest rates change.

NOTE 6 - DEPOSITS

Deposits and their respective weighted average interest rate at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

	September 30,				December 31,
	2012				2011
	Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount		Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount
	(Unaudited)
Noninterest-bearing demand accounts	-	%	$	103,306	-	%	$	84,374
NOW accounts	0.41		62,690		0.39		45,948
Money market accounts	0.27		101,426		0.38		127,667
Savings and club accounts	0.25		97,707		0.29		80,740
Brokered deposits	0.36		60,198		0.53		10,162
Certificates of deposit	1.76		277,806		2.03		327,703
	0.84	%	$	703,133	1.12	%	$	676,594

NOTE 7 – BORROWINGS

Pursuant to collateral agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (the “FHLB”), advances are secured by qualifying first mortgage loans, qualifying fixed-income securities, FHLB stock and an interest-bearing demand deposit account with the FHLB. As of September 30, 2012, the Bank had $138.1 million in qualifying collateral pledged against its advances.

Maturity Date	Amount		Coupon Rate	Call Date	Rate if Called
	(in thousands)
August 2014	$	10,000	0.52%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
September 2014	15,000		0.41%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
March 2015	10,000		0.49%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
August 2015	10,000		0.68%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
November 2017	15,000		3.62%	November 2012	LIBOR + 0.10%
November 2017	15,000		3.87%	November 2012	LIBOR + 0.10%
December 2017	20,000		2.83%	December 2012	LIBOR + 0.11%
	$	95,000	2.02%

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company terminated $36.3 million of FHLB borrowings at a pre-tax cost of $1.5 million, which was recorded in loss on extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement of operations.

For the borrowings which have a “Call Date” disclosed in the above table, if the borrowing is called, the Bank has the option to either pay off the borrowing without penalty or the borrowing’s fixed rate resets to a variable LIBOR based rate, as noted in the above table. Subsequent to the call date, the borrowings are callable by the FHLB quarterly. Accordingly, the contractual maturities above may differ from actual maturities.

23

NOTE 7 – BORROWINGS (CONTINUED)

The Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Pittsburgh of approximately $346.0 million at September 30, 2012. Additionally, as of September 30, 2012, the Bank has a maximum borrowing capacity of $53.3 million with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia through the Discount Window.

As a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, the Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB of Pittsburgh in an amount equal to at least 4.60% of its advances plus 0.35% of the Bank’s “eligible assets,” as such term is defined by the FHLB; and a maximum amount of 6.00% of its advances plus 1.0% of the Bank’s “eligible assets.”  The FHLB also indicated that it may increase its individual member stock investment requirements.  As of September 30, 2012, the Company’s minimum stock obligation was $6.5 million and a maximum stock obligation was $11.7 million.  Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, the FHLB of Pittsburgh resumed paying a quarterly dividend on its common stock, calculated at an annual rate of 0.10% of the Bank’s average stock held during the previous quarter.

Other Borrowed Funds – Long Term

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company terminated $20.0 million of other long-term borrowings at a pre-tax cost of $1.5 million, which was recorded in loss on extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement of operations.

Other borrowed funds obtained from large commercial banks under security repurchase agreements totaled $30.0 million at September 30, 2012.  These borrowings contractually mature with dates ranging from September 2018 through November 2018 and may be called by the lender based on the underlying agreements.  Accordingly, the contractual maturities below may differ from actual maturities.

				Next	Subsequent
Maturity Date	Amount		Coupon Rate	Call Date	Call Frequency
	(in thousands)
September 2018	$	10,000	3.40%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
September 2018	5,000		3.20%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
October 2018	5,000		3.15%	October 2012	Quarterly
October 2018	5,000		3.27%	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
November 2018	5,000		3.37%	November 2013	Not Applicable
	$	30,000	3.30%

Mortgage backed securities with a fair value of $38.1 million at September 30, 2012 were used to secure these other borrowed funds.

Other Borrowed Funds – Short Term

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $51.3 million and $8.5 million, respectively, of short-term borrowings.  The short-term borrowings at September 30, 2012 have a blended weighted average rate of 0.24% and the borrowings at December 31, 2011 had a blended weighted average rate of 0.25%.  Short-term borrowings consist of overnight and term borrowings with an original maturity less than one year.  Short-term borrowings are obtained from commercial banks, participants in the Federal Funds market and the FHLB.

24

NOTE 8 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded $873,000 of stock based compensation expense comprised of stock option expense of $350,000 and restricted stock expense of $523,000.

The following is a summary of the Bancorp’s stock option activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

				Weighted
		Weighted		Average
	Number of	Average		Remaining	Aggregate
	Stock	Exercise		Contractual	Intrinsic
	Options	Price		Life	Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2011	788,142	$	11.23	6.6 years	$	1,111,000
Granted	146,550	13.15
Exercised	(43,227)	10.94
Forfeited / Cancelled	(12,669)	11.04
Outstanding at September 30, 2012	878,796	$	11.57	6.5 years	$	3,562,000
Exercisable at September 30, 2012	566,152	$	11.26	5.3 years	$	2,466,000

The following is a summary of the Company’s unvested options as of September 30, 2012 and the changes therein during the nine months then ended:

		Weighted
	Number of	Average
	Stock	Grant Date
	Options	Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2011	322,530	$	3.15
Granted	146,550	3.57
Vested	(143,767)	3.11
Forfeited / Cancelled	(12,669)	3.12
Unvested at September 30, 2012	312,644	$	3.36

Expected future expense relating to the 312,644 non-vested options outstanding as of September 30, 2012 is $944,000 over a weighted average period of 4.0 years.

The fair value of the options granted in 2012 ranged from $3.56 to $3.92. The fair value was based on the following assumptions:

Expected Dividend Yield	1.82%
Expected Volatility	32.04% - 32.47%
Risk-Free Interest Rate	0.86% - 1.10%
Expected Option Life in Years	6.50

25

NOTE 8 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s restricted stock as of September 30, 2012 and changes therein during the nine months then ended:

		Weighted
	Number of	Average
	Restricted	Grant Date
	Shares	Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2011	119,990	$	11.54
Granted	69,950	13.14
Vested	(56,108)	11.47
Forfeited / Cancelled	(3,025)	12.08
Unvested at September 30, 2012	130,807	$	12.41

Expected future compensation expense relating to the 130,807 restricted shares at September 30, 2012 is $1.5 million over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company granted 22,500 shares of performance based restricted stock to certain executive officers of the Company.  50% of the awarded performance based stock will vest on the third anniversary of the grant, 25% will vest on the fourth anniversary of the grant, and 25% will vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant, in each case subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics.  The performance metrics to be evaluated during the performance period are (1) return on assets compared to peer group and (2) earnings growth rate compared to peer group.

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of the respective quarter ends, and have not been reevaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each quarter end.

The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments using three levels of input:

Level 1—Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Valuations are observed from unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.

26

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED)

Investment and Mortgage Related Securities—Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity

Fair values for investment securities and mortgage related securities are obtained from one external pricing service (“primary pricing service”) as the provider of pricing on the investment portfolio on a quarterly basis. We generally obtain one quote per investment security. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities. If quoted market prices are not available for comparable securities, fair value is based on quoted bids for the security or comparable securities. We review the estimates of fair value provided by the pricing service to determine if they are representative of fair value based upon our general knowledge of market conditions and relative changes in interest rates and the credit environment. The Company made no adjustments to the values obtained from the primary pricing service.

Loans Receivable, Net

To determine the fair values of loans that are not impaired, we employ discounted cash flow analyses that use interest rates and terms similar to those currently being offered to borrowers. We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. We record fair value adjustments to loans on a nonrecurring basis to reflect full and partial charge-offs due to impairment. For impaired loans, we use a variety of techniques to measure fair value, such as using the current appraised value of the collateral, agreements of sale, discounting the contractual cash flows, and analyzing market data that we may adjust due to specific characteristics of the loan or collateral.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The fair value of the Federal Home Loan Bank stock is assumed to equal its cost, since the stock is nonmarketable but redeemable at its par value.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

The fair value of the MSRs for these periods was determined using a third-party valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds and discount rates.

Financial Assets Acquired from Debtors

The fair value of life insurance policies was determined using valuations obtained from a third party valuation firm who utilized a discounted cash flow model to calculate the fair value of the policies.  The significant assumptions used in the valuation were the life expectancies of the insured parties, future premium payments and discount rates.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates fair value.

Deposit Liabilities

Fair values for demand deposits (including NOW accounts), savings and club accounts and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. Fair values of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit, including brokered deposits, are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar instruments with similar maturities.

Short-term Borrowings, Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Other Borrowed Funds

Fair value of short-term borrowings, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on rates currently available to the Bank for advances with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Derivative Contracts

The fair values of derivative contracts are based upon the estimated amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts or agreements, taking into account underlying interest rates, creditworthiness of underlying customers for credit derivatives and, when appropriate, the creditworthiness of the counterparties.

27

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED)

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

Fair value of commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account market interest rates, the remaining terms and present creditworthiness of the counterparties.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):

		September 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
		(Unaudited)				(Audited)
	Fair Value			Estimated				Estimated
	Hierarchy	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Level	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Level 1	$	15,079	$	15,079	$	7,586	$	7,586
Available for sale securities:
Investment securities available-for-sale	Level 2	12,507		12,507		23,106		23,106
Private label residential mortgage related security	Level 3	-		-		122		122
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	Level 3	6,465		6,465		8,906		8,906
Agency residential mortgage related securities	Level 2	279,261		279,261		216,636		216,636
Held to maturity securities:
Agency mortgage related securities	Level 2	31,651		32,958		41,074		41,758
Loans receivable, net	Level 3	673,701		676,136		670,572		672,847
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	Level 3	7,407		7,407		8,074		8,074
Accrued interest receivable	Level 3	3,443		3,443		4,578		4,578
Mortgage servicing rights	Level 2	199		199		316		322
Financial assets acquired from debtors	Level 3	2,604		2,604		-		-
Financial liabilities:
Savings and club accounts	Level 2	97,707		97,707		80,740		80,740
Demand, NOW and money market deposits	Level 2	267,422		267,422		257,989		257,989
Brokered deposits	Level 2	60,198		60,197		10,162		10,129
Certificates of deposit	Level 2	277,806		280,648		327,703		330,941
Short-term borrowings	Level 2	51,300		51,300		8,500		8,500
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	Level 2	95,000		101,181		88,278		95,878
Other borrowed funds	Level 2	30,000		33,821		50,000		55,103
Accrued interest payable	Level 2	345		345		418		418
Derivative contracts	Level 2, 3	361		361		279		279
Off-balance sheet instruments	Level 3	-		1,124		-		1,443

28

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED)

The Company classified four types of financial instruments carried at fair value as Level 3 as of September 30, 2012:

·Private label commercial mortgage related securities (“CMBS”), the fair value of which are difficult to determine because they are not actively traded in securities markets.  The net unrealized gain in the private label CMBS portfolio was $98,000 and $107,000 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

·Two loans at September 30, 2012 since lending credit risk is not an observable input for these commercial loans (see Note 4). The unrealized gain on the two loans was $314,000 at September 30, 2012 compared to $268,000 at December 31, 2011.

·Financial assets acquired from debtors, includes four life insurance policies. The life expectancies of the insured parties, future premium payments and discount rates used to value these policies are significant unobservable inputs.  As of September 30, 2012, the aggregate fair value and face value of the policies was $2.6 million and $25.2 million, respectively.  Losses resulting from changes in fair value, totaling $82,000, for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, were recorded in assets acquired through foreclosure expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

·Credit derivatives are valued based on creditworthiness of the underlying borrower which is a significant unobservable input. The unrealized loss on the credit derivatives was $31,000 at September 30, 2012 compared to $0 at December 31, 2011.

The following measures were made on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Other
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	As of		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	September 30, 2012		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In Thousands)
Available for Sale Securities:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	315	$	-	$	315	$	-
State and political subdivisions	-		-		-		-
Corporate securities	12,192		-		12,192		-
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	6,465		-		-		6,465
Agency residential mortgage related securities	279,261		-		279,261		-
Loans (1)	2,853		-		-		2,853
Financial assets acquired from debtors	2,604		-		-		2,604
Derivative contracts (1)	(361)		-		(330)		(31)
Total	$	303,329	$	-	$	291,438	$	11,891

(1)           Such financial instruments are recorded at fair value as further described in Note 4.

29

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED)

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Other
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	As of		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	December 31, 2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In Thousands)
Available for Sale Securities:
Obligations of U.S. government agencies	$	6,514	$	-	$	6,514	$	-
State and political subdivisions	1,873		-		1,873		-
Corporate securities	14,719		-		14,719		-
Private label residential mortgage related security	122		-		-		122
Private label commercial mortgage related securities	8,906		-		-		8,906
Agency residential mortgage related securities	216,636		-		216,636		-
Loans (1)	2,877		-		-		2,877
Derivative contracts (1)	(279)		-		(279)		-
Total	$	251,368	$	-	$	239,463	$	11,905

(1)           Such financial instruments are recorded at fair value as further described in Note 4.

The following measures were made on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

The loans were partially charged off at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  The loans’ fair values are based on Level 3 inputs, which are either an appraised value or a sales agreement, less costs to sell. These amounts do not include fully charged-off loans, because we carry fully charged-off loans at zero on our balance sheet.

For other real estate owned, we used Level 3 inputs, which consist of appraisals or agreements of sale. Other real estate owned is initially recorded on our balance sheet at fair value, net of costs to sell, when we obtain control of the property.

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Other
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	Balance		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
As of September 30, 2012	(In Thousands)
Loans	$	2,951	$	-	$	-	$	2,951
Mortgage servicing rights	199		-		199		-
Other real estate owned	5,042		-		-		5,042
Total	$	8,192	$	-	$	199	$	7,993
As of December 31, 2011
Loans	$	2,490	$	-	$	-	$	2,490
Mortgage servicing rights	282		-		282		-
Other real estate owned	2,423		-		-		2,423
Total	$	5,195	$	-	$	282	$	4,913

30

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED)

The following tables include a roll forward of the financial instruments which fair value is determined using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) for the periods of December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
	Private Label		Private Label
	Residential		Commercial				Financial
	Mortgage		Mortgage				Assets
	Related		Related		Derivative		Acquired
	Security		Securities		Contracts		from Debtors		Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2011	$	122	$	8,906	$	-	$	-	$	2,877	$	11,905
Purchases/additions	-		-		(36)		2,404		-		2,368
Sales	(70)		-		-		-		-		(70)
Payments (received) made	(7)		(2,432)		-		282		(70)		(2,227)
Premium amortization, net	-		-		-		-		-		-
Increase/(decrease) in value	(45)		(9)		5		(82)		46		(85)
Reclassification to Level 3	-		-		-		-		-		-
Ending balance, September 30, 2012	$	-	$	6,465	$	(31)	$	2,604	$	2,853	$	11,891
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Private Label		Private Label
	Residential		Commercial				Financial
	Mortgage		Mortgage				Assets
	Related		Related		Derivative		Acquired
	Security		Securities		Contracts		from Debtors		Loan		Total
	(In thousands)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2010	$	166	$	11,767	$	-	$	-	$	1,241	$	13,174
Purchases	-		-		-		-		-		-
Sales	-		-		-		-		-		-
Payments received	(23)		(2,399)		-		-		(47)		(2,469)
Premium amortization, net	-		(11)		-		-		-		(11)
Increase/(decrease) in value	(14)		(263)		-		-		56		(221)
Reclassification to Level 3	-		-		-		-		-		-
Ending balance, September 30, 2011	$	129	$	9,094	$	-	$	-	$	1,250	$	10,473

There were no transfers made between levels during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2011.

31

NOTE 10 – ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-03 - Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This update is intended to improve financial reporting of repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. ASU No. 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control (i) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (ii) the collateral maintenance guidance related to that criterion. ASU No. 2011-03 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04 - Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The amendments were issued to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The guidance clarifies how a principal market is determined, addresses the fair value measurement of instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks and the concept of valuation premise and highest and best use, extends the prohibition on blockage factors to all three levels of the fair value hierarchy, and requires additional disclosures. ASU No. 2011-04 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and was to be applied prospectively. Adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations but did result in additional disclosures within the fair value footnote.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-05 - Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 are intended to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase prominence of the items reported in other comprehensive income.  The guidance requires entities to report the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate financial statements. This update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, and was to be applied retrospectively. Adoption of this update resulted in the addition of the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the removal of the Comprehensive Income footnote.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11 - Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-11 are intended to enhance current disclosure requirements on offsetting financial assets and liabilities.  The new disclosures will enable financial statement users to compare balance sheets prepared under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are subject to different offsetting models. The disclosures will be limited to financial instruments (and derivatives) subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements and will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2013 and is to be applied retrospectively.  The Company has evaluated the guidance included in this update and has determined that it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-12 - Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.  This update defers the effective date of the requirement to present separate line items on the income statement for reclassification adjustments of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The deferral is temporary until the Board reconsiders the operational concerns and needs of financial statement users. The Board has not yet established a timetable for its reconsideration.  Entities are still required to present reclassification adjustments within other comprehensive income either on the face of the statement that reports other comprehensive income or in the notes to the financial statements. The Company does not expect the guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements but will result in a revised presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company and its subsidiary include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, national and regional economic conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality and composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in the Company’s market area, Hurricane Sandy negatively impacting our asset quality and earnings, changes in real estate market values in the Company’s market area, changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines and the inability of third party service providers to perform their functions.  Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in the sections titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on

32

March 12, 2012, in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2012 and its other Securities and Exchange Commission reports.

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, the Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies: allowance for loan losses, valuation and other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, and deferred income taxes.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level representing management’s best estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio, based on management’s evaluation of the portfolio’s collectability. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged against income. Management estimates the allowance balance required using loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, trends in industry charge-offs by particular segments, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, trends and absolute levels of nonperforming loans, trends and absolute levels of classified and criticized loans, trends and absolute levels in delinquent loans and troubled debt restructurings, trends and absolute levels within different risk ratings, and changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our lending areas and the national economy.

Additionally, for loans identified by management as impaired, management will provide a reserve based on the expected discounted cash flows of the loan, or for loans determined to be collateral dependent, a reserve is established based on appraised value less costs to sell. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if actual conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. Further, current weak economic conditions, such as high unemployment and depressed real estate values, have increased the uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. In addition, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.

Valuation and Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities.  Investment securities are reviewed quarterly to determine whether the fair value is below the current carrying value. When the fair value of any of our investment securities has declined below its current carrying value, management is required to assess whether the decline is other-than-temporary. A review of other-than-temporary impairment requires companies to make certain judgments regarding the nature of the decline, and the probability, extent and timing of a valuation recovery and Fox Chase Bancorp’s intent to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that the security will be required to be sold before recovery of its amortized cost. Pursuant to these requirements, we assess valuation declines to determine the extent to which such changes are attributable to (1) fundamental factors specific to the issuer, such as financial condition, business prospects or other factors, or (2) market-related factors, such as market yields, interest rates of equity or market declines. If the decline in the market value of a security is determined to be other-than-temporary, the credit portion of the impairment is written down through earnings and the non-credit portion is an adjustment to other comprehensive income.

Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

33

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

Total assets increased $55.4 million, or 5.5%, to $1.07 billion at September 30, 2012, compared to $1.02 billion at December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily driven by increased investments securities and cash and cash equivalents.  Total investments securities increased $40.0 million, or 13.8%, from $289.4 million at December 31, 2011 to $329.9 million at September 30, 2012.  This increase was driven by a $60.0 million, or 26.6%, increase in mortgage related securities available-for-sale offset by decreases in non-mortgage related securities available-for-sale of $10.6 million, or 45.9%, and mortgage related securities held-to-maturity of $9.4 million, or 22.9%.  Cash and cash equivalents increased $7.5 million from December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012, as the Company had excess liquidity due to increased short-term borrowings and the timing of loan payoffs.

Loans increased $3.1 million, or 0.5%, from $670.6 million at December 31, 2011 to $673.7 million at September 30, 2012, primarily due to increases in multi-family and commercial real estate loans, commercial construction loans and commercial and industrial loans offset by decreases in one-to four-family loans and consumer loans.  Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $39.3 million, primarily due to increased line utilization by mortgage banking customers and new loan production.  Commercial and industrial loans increased $1.7 million and commercial construction loans increased $1.3 million, primarily due to increased utilization of commitments and new loan production.  One- to four-family real estate loans decreased $30.5 million and consumer loans decreased $9.8 million, primarily due to normal payments and loan payoffs exceeding new originations for the period.

Deposits increased $26.5 million, or 3.9%, from $676.6 million at December 31, 2011 to $703.1 million at September 30, 2012.  From December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012, brokered deposits increased $50.0 million, noninterest-bearing demand accounts increased $18.9 million, savings and club accounts increased $17.0 million, and NOW accounts increased $16.7 million. Offsetting these increases were decreased money market accounts of $26.2 million and non-brokered certificates of deposits of $49.9 million.  The increase in brokered deposits is primarily the result of the Company’s balance sheet restructuring during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and the Bank’s decision to utilize this source of relatively low-cost funding.  The increase in noninterest-bearing demand accounts is primarily due to deposits obtained from commercial borrowing relationships.  The decrease in money market deposits was primarily due to the Company not offering pricing promotions and instead maintaining its money market rates at the midpoint of the market. The decrease in certificates of deposit relates primarily to customer redemptions associated with certificates of deposit obtained during pricing promotions offered in 2010.   Short-term borrowings increased $42.8 million from $8.5 million at December 31, 2011 to $51.3 million at September 30, 2012, due to increased utilization of the Company’s overnight and other short-term borrowing facilities.  Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased $6.7 million, or 7.6%, from $88.3 million at December 31, 2011 to $95.0 million at September 30, 2012 due to incremental borrowings, totaling $45.0 million, offset by terminations of $36.3 million and principal amortization of $2.0 million.  Other borrowed funds decreased $20.0 million, or 40.0%, from $50.0 million at December 31, 2011 to $30.0 million at September 30, 2012 due to the termination of one borrowing.

Stockholders’ equity decreased $4.6 million to $183.6 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $188.2 million at December 31, 2011 primarily due to stock repurchases of $8.5 million, dividends paid of $1.5 million offset by an net income of $3.2 million and stock-based compensation activity of $2.1 million, and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $95,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

General. Net income increased $204,000, or 16.6%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in net income was due to an increase in net interest income of $172,000, a decrease of $564,000 in the provision for loan losses and an increase in noninterest income of $270,000 offset by an increase in noninterest expense of $708,000 and an increase in income tax expense of $94,000.  Contributing to the increase in noninterest expense is an increase in valuation adjustments on assets acquired through foreclosure of $577,000.

Net income decreased $573,000, or 15.3%, to $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease was due to an increase in noninterest expense of $4.3 million and an increase in provision for loan losses of $127,000 offset by an increase in net interest income of $421,000, an increase in noninterest income of $3.1 million and a decrease in income tax expense of $275,000.  Contributing to the increase in noninterest expense is a loss of $3.0 million on the extinguishment of debt and an increase in valuation adjustments on assets acquired through foreclosure of $522,000. The increase in noninterest income was primarily the result of a $2.7 million increase in net investment securities gains.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $172,000, or 2.1%, to $8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $8.1 million for the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in total interest expense of $1.2 million offset by a decrease in total interest income of $1.1 million. The decrease in total interest expense was due to a $26.7 million

34

decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities and a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 1.85% to 1.25%.  The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to a decrease of $38.9 million in average borrowings offset by an increase of $12.2 million in interest-bearing deposits. The decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was due to decreases in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits from 1.40% to 1.03% and a decrease in the average cost of borrowings from 3.53% to 2.36%.  The decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits reflects a reduction in the overall interest rate environment during 2011 and 2012, maturities of higher rate certificates of deposit and reduced rates on other deposit products.  The decrease in the average cost borrowings is primarily due to the termination of FHLB advances and other borrowed funds, totaling $56.3 million, with an average cost of funds of 3.50%, during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and the maturity of FHLB advances totaling $30.0 million, with an average cost of 4.88%, during the three months ended September 30, 2011.   The decrease in total interest income was primarily due to a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets from 4.46% to 4.25% and a $29.7 million decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets.  The decrease in yield was primarily due to decreases in the yields on total loans from 5.45% to 5.02% and mortgage-related securities from 3.07% to 2.56%. The decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets was primarily due to a $22.5 million decrease in interest-earning demand deposits, a $20.9 million decrease in mortgage-related securities and a $16.4 million decrease in non-mortgage-related securities offset by a $30.1 million increase in net loans.

Net interest income increased $421,000, or 1.8%, to $23.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $23.5 million for the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in total interest expense of $3.4 million offset by a decrease in total interest income of $3.0 million. The decrease in total interest expense was due to a $54.1 million decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities and a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 1.95% to 1.48%.  The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to decreases of $32.5 million in average borrowings and $21.6 million in interest-bearing deposits, respectively. The decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was due to decreases in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits from 1.49% to 1.14% and a decrease in the average cost of borrowings from 3.62% to 2.97%.  The decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits reflects a reduction in the overall interest rate environment during 2011 and 2012, maturities of higher rate certificates of deposit and reduced rates on other deposit products.  The decrease in the average cost of borrowings is primarily due to the termination of FHLB advances and other borrowed funds, totaling $56.3 million, with an average cost of funds of 3.50%, during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and the maturity of FHLB advances totaling $30.0 million, with an average cost of 4.88%, during the three months ended September 30, 2011.   The decrease in total interest income was primarily due to a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets from 4.41% to 4.33% and a $65.4 million decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets.  The decrease in yield was primarily due to a decrease in the yield on total loans from 5.45% to 5.15% and mortgage-related securities from 3.14% to 2.74%. The decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets was primarily due to a $41.7 million decrease in mortgage-related securities, a $32.9 million decrease in interest-earning demand deposits, and a $14.6 million decrease in non-mortgage-related securities offset by a $23.7 million increase in net loans.

The following table summarizes average balances and average yields and costs of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Any adjustments necessary to present yields on a tax-equivalent basis are insignificant.

35

	Three Months Ended September 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012						2011						2012						2011
				Interest						Interest						Interest						Interest
	Average			and		Yield/	Average			and		Yield/	Average			and		Yield/	Average			and		Yield/
	Balance			Dividends		Cost	Balance			Dividends		Cost	Balance			Dividends		Cost	Balance			Dividends		Cost
Assets:	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning demand deposits	$	5,741		$	-	0.05%	$	28,268		$	16	0.22%	$	7,213		$	5	0.10%	$	40,141		$	69	0.23%
Mortgage-related securities
Available-for-sale	261,232			1,747		2.67%	268,606			2,240		3.34%	246,942			5,363		2.90%	276,119			6,993		3.38%
Held-to-maturity	33,682			141		1.68%	47,209			185		1.56%	36,736			459		1.67%	49,268			658		1.78%
Total mortgage-related securities	294,914			1,888		2.56%	315,815			2,425		3.07%	283,678			5,822		2.74%	325,387			7,651		3.14%
Taxable securities	17,207			60		1.38%	31,516			116		1.47%	21,734			231		1.41%	32,464			380		1.56%
Nontaxable securities	4			1		87.75%	2,105			28		5.30%	984			34		4.65%	4,767			165		4.62%
Loans:
Residential loans	174,127			2,106		4.84%	215,787			2,707		5.02%	182,600			6,752		4.93%	225,682			8,480		5.01%
Commercial loans	470,864			6,076		5.13%	387,128			5,601		5.66%	444,956			17,726		5.32%	368,607			15,813		5.66%
Consumer loans	36,584			400		4.37%	49,754			713		5.73%	41,149			1,314		4.26%	51,713			2,286		5.89%
Total Loans	681,575			8,582		5.02%	652,669			9,021		5.45%	668,705			25,792		5.15%	646,002			26,579		5.45%
Allowance for loan losses	(11,615		)				(12,834		)				(11,836		)				(12,851		)
Net loans	669,960			8,582			639,835			9,021			656,869			25,792			633,151			26,579
Total interest-earning assets	987,826			10,531		4.25%	1,017,539			11,606		4.46%	970,478			31,884		4.33%	1,035,910			34,844		4.41%
Noninterest-earning assets	44,930						44,186						43,720						42,140
Total assets	$	1,032,756					$	1,061,725					$	1,014,198					$	1,078,050
Liabilities and equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW and money market deposit accounts	$	164,733		138		0.33%	$	174,336		192		0.44%	$	164,706		444		0.36%	$	175,964		570		0.43%
Savings accounts	98,265			61		0.25%	72,707			49		0.27%	93,360			195		0.28%	64,750			95		0.20%
Brokered deposits	60,351			76		1.81%	-			-		-	28,934			120		1.89%	-			-		-
Certificates of deposit	285,853			1,303		0.50%	349,936			1,858		2.11%	298,409			4,227		0.55%	366,267			6,104		2.23%
Total interest-bearing deposits	609,202			1,578		1.03%	596,979			2,099		1.40%	585,409			4,986		1.14%	606,981			6,769		1.49%
Short-term borrowings	26,834			16		0.24%	2,116			2		0.29%	77,504			26		0.23%	705			2		0.30%
FHLB advances	64,484			450		2.78%	108,085			1,007		3.64%	15,434			1,892		3.26%	117,244			3,314		3.73%
Other borrowed funds	30,000			254		3.36%	50,000			437		3.42%	42,519			1,096		3.44%	50,000			1,296		3.42%
Total borrowings	121,318			720		2.36%	160,201			1,446		3.53%	135,457			3,014		2.97%	167,949			4,612		3.62%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	730,520			2,298		1.25%	757,180			3,545		1.85%	720,866			8,000		1.48%	774,930			11,381		1.95%
Noninterest-bearing deposits	114,983						91,414						103,299						90,021
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities	3,529						9,176						4,576						6,686
Total liabilities	849,032						857,770						828,741						871,637
Stockholders’ equity	178,169						195,957						179,178						199,263
Accumulated comprehensive income	5,555						7,998						6,279						7,150
Total stockholder’s equity	183,724						203,955						185,457						206,413
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,032,756					$	1,061,725					$	1,014,198					$	1,078,050
Net interest income				$	8,233					$	8,061					$	23,884					$	23,463
Interest rate spread						3.00%						2.61%						2.85%						2.46%
Net interest margin						3.29%						3.10%						3.24%						2.96%
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities						135.22%						134.39%						134.63%						133.68%

36

Rate/Volume Analysis.  The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income.  The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by current volume).  The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate).  The net column represents the sum of the prior columns.  For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionally based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2012									September 30, 2012
	Compared to									Compared to
	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011									September 30, 2011
	Increase (Decrease)									Increase (Decrease)
	Due to									Due to
	Rate			Volume			Net			Rate			Volume			Net
Interest and dividend income:
Interest-earning demand deposits	$	(3	)	$	(13	)	$	(16	)	$	(7	)	$	(57	)	$	(64	)
Mortgage-related securities
Available-for-sale	(433		)	(60		)	(493		)	(892		)	(738		)	(1,630		)
Held-to-maturity	10			(54		)	(44		)	(31		)	(168		)	(199		)
Total mortgage-related securities	(423		)	(114		)	(537		)	(923		)	(906		)	(1,829		)
Taxable securities	(4		)	(52		)	(56		)	(24		)	(125		)	(149		)
Nontaxable securities	1			(28		)	(27		)	-			(131		)	(131		)
Loans:
Residential loans	(78		)	(523		)	(601		)	(109		)	(1,619		)	(1,728		)
Commercial loans	(736		)	1,211			475			(1,362		)	3,275			1,913
Consumer loans	(124		)	(189		)	(313		)	(505		)	(467		)	(972		)
Total loans	(938		)	499			(439		)	(1,976		)	1,189			(787		)
Total interest-earning assets	(1,367		)	292			(1,075		)	(2,930		)	(30		)	(2,960		)
Interest Expense:
NOW and money market deposits	(44		)	(10		)	(54		)	(90		)	(36		)	(126		)
Savings accounts	(6		)	18			12			59			41			100
Brokered deposits	-			76			76			-			120			120
Certificates of deposit	(214		)	(341		)	(555		)	(746		)	(1,131		)	(1,877		)
Total interest-bearing deposits	(264		)	(257		)	(521		)	(777		)	(1,006		)	(1,783		)
Short-term borrowings	-			14			14			-			24			24
FHLB advances	(150		)	(407		)	(557		)	(298		)	(1,124		)	(1,422		)
Other borrowed funds	(9		)	(174		)	(183		)	(7		)	(193		)	(200		)
Total borrowings	(159		)	(567		)	(726		)	(305		)	(1,293		)	(1,598		)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(423		)	(824		)	(1,247		)	(1,082		)	(2,299		)	(3,381		)
Net change in net interest income	$	(944	)	$	1,116		$	172		$	(1,848	)	$	2,269		$	421

37

Provision for Loan Losses. The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $470,000 and $3.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.  The decrease in provision for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily due to the payoff of two substandard loan relationships, totaling $13.7 million, which resulted in a reduction of loan loss reserve.

The following table provides information with respect to our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:

	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
	(Unaudited)
Nonaccrual Loans:
One- to four-family real estate	$	2,010		$	6,885
Multi-family and commercial real estate	3,974			3,814
Construction	7,085			6,372
Consumer	4,316			7
Commercial and industrial	-			-
Total	17,385			17,078
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Multi-family and commercial real estate	165			-
Consumer	$	-		$	3,875
Total	$	165		$	3,875
Nonperforming Loans	17,550			20,953
Assets acquired through foreclosure	7,646			2,423
Total nonperforming assets	$	25,196		$	23,376
Total nonperforming loans to total loans	2.56		%	3.07		%
Total nonperforming loans to total assets	1.64			2.06
Total nonperforming assets to total assets	2.35			2.30
Impaired Loans:
Nonperforming loans	$	17,550		$	20,953
Troubled debt restructurings	7,342			7,207
Other impaired loans	-			2,354
Total impaired loans	$	24,892		$	30,514

38

The following table sets forth our nonaccrual loans by state and loan segment at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The tables do not include accruing loans past due 90 days or more.

September 30, 2012

	One- to Four- Family Real Estate			Multi Family and Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Consumer			Commercial and Industrial			Total
	Number			Number			Number			Number			Number			Number
	of			of			of			of			of			of
	Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Pennsylvania	6	$	501	-	$	-	2	$	7,085	6	$	148	-	$	-	14	$	7,734
New Jersey	6	1,509		4	2,739		-	-		3	313		-	-		13	4,561
Other	-	-		1	1,235		-	-		7	3,855		-	-		8	5,090
Total	12	$	2,010	5	$	3,974	2	$	7,085	16	$	4,316	-	$	-	35	$	17,385

December 31, 2011

	One- to Four- Family Real Estate			Multi Family and Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Consumer			Commercial and Industrial			Total
	Number			Number			Number			Number			Number			Number
	of			of			of			of			of			of
	Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount		Loans	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Pennsylvania	8	$	5,622	3	$	801	2	$	5,210	1	$	7	-	$	-	14	$	11,640
New Jersey	5	1,263		4	3,013		1	1,162		-	-		-	-		10	5,438
Total	13	$	6,885	7	$	3,814	3	$	6,372	1	$	7	-	$	-	24	$	17,078

39

The following table provides a rollforward of our nonperforming assets, by loan segment and assets acquired through foreclosure, from December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012.  The table does not include accruing loans past due 90 days or more.

											Transfer
	At		Additional						Net		To Assets		At
	December		Non-		Return to		Payments		Charge-offs/		Acquired		September
	31,		Performing		Accrual		Received,		Valuation		Through		30,
	2011		Assets, Net		Status		Net		Allowances		Foreclosure		2012
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans
One- to four-family real estate	$	6,885	$	851	$	(155)	$	(127)	$	(1,404)	$	(4,040)	$	2,010
Multi-family and commercial real estate	3,814		1,978		-		(10)		(886)		(922)		3,974
Construction	6,372		2,297		-		(1,244)		(340)		-		7,085
Consumer	7		8,997		(34)		(948)		(1,302)		(2,404)		4,316
Commercial and industrial	-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	17,078		14,123		(189)		(2,329)		(3,932)		(7,366)		17,385
Assets acquired through foreclosure	2,423		317		-		(1,528)		(932)		7,366		7,646
Total nonperforming assets	$	19,501	$	14,440	$	(189)	$	(3,857)	$	(4,864)	$	-	$	25,031

At September 30, 2012, nonperforming assets were comprised of the following:

· Two construction loans for residential developments, the largest of which is collateralized by land and improvements associated with a residential housing development in Chester County, Pennsylvania. The other nonaccrual construction loan at September 30, 2012 is collateralized by a residential housing development in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

· Six multi-family and commercial real estate loans, the largest of which is secured by a restaurant in Delaware.

· Twelve one- to four-family loans, the largest of which is secured by a residential home located in Cape May County, New Jersey.

· Seven consumer loans to finance insurance premiums, totaling $3.9 million which are secured by the underlying insurance policies.

· Nine consumer loans, each of which is secured by a second or third lien mortgage position.

· Six properties in assets acquired through foreclosure, with a total carrying value of $5.0 million, the largest of which is a residential home located in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

· Four insurance policies in assets acquired through foreclosure which have a fair value of $2.6 million.

40

The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

	At September 30, 2012				At December 31, 2011
	30-59		60-89		30-59		60-89
	Days		Days		Days		Days
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due
	(in thousands)
One- to four-family real estate	$	542	$	459	$	370	$	252
Multi-family and commercial real estate	54		-		-		-
Construction	-		64		-		-
Consumer	104		-		1,097		169
Commercial and industrial	-		-		-		-
Total
	$	700	$	523	$	1,467	$	421

At September 30, 2012, delinquent loans were comprised of seventeen different loan relationships. Total delinquent loans decreased by $665,000 to $1.2 million at September 30, 2012 from $1.9 million at December 31, 2011.  The decrease was primarily the migration of insurance premiums finance loans, totaling $939,000, to nonperforming loans.

Noninterest Income. The following table summarizes noninterest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months								Nine Months
	Ended September 30,				$		%		Ended September 30,				$		%
	2012		2011		Change		Change		2012		2011		Change		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Service charges and other fee income	$	364	$	428	$	(64)	(15.0)	%	$	1,138	$	1,207	$	(69)	(5.7)	%
Net gain on sale of assets acquired through foreclosure	8		57		(49)		(86.0)		135		77		58		75.3
Impairment loss on real estate held for investment	-		(110)		110		100.0		-		(110)		110		100.0
Income on bank-owned life insurance	117		119		(2)		(1.7)		354		349		5		1.4
Other	248		133		115		86.5		544		222		322		145.0
Total other than temporary impairment loss	-		(206)		206		(100.0)		-		(407)		407		(100.0)
Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)	-		46		(46)		(100.0)		-		46		(46)		(100.0)
Net other-than-temporary impairment loss	-		(160)		160		(100.0)		-		(361)		361		(100.0)
Net gain on sale of investment securities	-		-		-		100.0		2,340		-		2,340		(100.0)
Net investment securities gains	-		(160)		160		100.0		2,340		(361)		2,701		748.2
Total Noninterest Income	$	737	$	467	$	270	57.8	%	$	4,511	$	1,384	$	3,127	225.9	%

For the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, service charges and other fee income decreased $64,000, primarily due to decreases in loan related fees of $80,000 and deposit related fees of $13,000 offset by an increase in credit derivative income of $29,000.  During the three months ended September 30, 2012, there was no net other-than-temporary impairment loss or impairment loss on real estate held for investment compared to $160,000 and $110,000, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2011.  Other noninterest income increased $115,000, primarily due to an increase of income on the Bank’s investment in PMA as a result of higher mortgage loan volume.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, service charges and other fee income decreased $69,000, primarily due to decreases in loan related fees of $72,000 offset by an increase in deposit related fees of $3,000.  There was no net other-than-temporary impairment loss or impairment loss on real estate held for investment during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $361,000 and $110,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Net gain on sale of investment securities was $2.3 million, compared to no gain in the same period in 2011, due to the sale of $72.9 million of investments securities during the three months ended June 30, 2012.  Other noninterest income increased $322,000, primarily due to an increase of income on the Bank’s investment in PMA as a result of higher mortgage loan volume.

41

Noninterest Expense. The following table summarizes noninterest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months								Nine Months
	Ended September 30,				$		%		Ended September 30,				$		%
	2012		2011		Change		Change		2012		2011		Change		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries, benefits and other compensation	$	3,458	$	3,297	$	161	4.9	%	$	10,150	$	9,678	$	472	4.9	%
Occupancy expense	415		457		(42)		(9.2)		1,294		1,388		(94)		(6.8)
Furniture and equipment expense	119		107		12		11.2		409		314		95		30.3
Data processing costs	441		439		2		0.5		1,359		1,277		82		6.4
Professional fees	369		410		(41)		(10.0)		1,327		1,245		82		6.6
Marketing expense	65		95		(30)		(31.6)		217		240		(23)		(9.6)
FDIC premiums	199		170		29		17.1		581		682		(101)		(14.8)
Assets acquired through foreclosure expense	962		315		647		205.4		1,115		459		656		142.9
Loss on extinguishment of debt	-		-		-		-		3,018		-		3,018		100.0
Other	370		400		(30)		(7.5)		1,267		1,185		82		6.9
Total Noninterest Expense	$	6,398	$	5,690	$	708	12.4	%	$	20,737	$	16,468	$	4,269	25.9	%

For the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, salaries, benefits and other compensation increased $161,000, primarily as a result of increased compliance staffing, stock-based compensation expense and annual merit increases.  Assets acquired through foreclosure expense increased $647,000, primarily due to an increase in valuation adjustments of $577,000.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011, salaries, benefits and other compensation increased $472,000, primarily as a result of increased compliance costs, stock-based compensation expense and annual merit increases.  FDIC premiums decreased $101,000 due to a lower assessment rate and lower average asset balances.  Assets acquired through foreclosure expense increased $656,000, primarily due to an increase in valuation adjustments of $522,000.  Loss on extinguishment of debt was $3.0 million in conjunction with the Company’s balance sheet restructuring during the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Income Taxes. The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $666,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, compared to $572,000 and $1.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The Bancorp’s effective income tax rate was 31.7% and 31.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to 31.7% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Management

Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and sales, securities repayments, maturities and sales and funds available from the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loans and securities sales and prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

42

The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

			Payments Due by Period
					One to
			Less Than		Three		Three to		More Than
Contractual Obligations	Total		One Year		Years		Five Years		Five Years
	(In thousands)
At September 30, 2012
Operating lease obligations (1)	$	1,280	$	295	$	840	$	145	$	-
FHLB advances and other borrowings (2)	191,743		54,251		50,741		5,440		81,311
Other long-term obligations (3)	2,573		1,873		700		-		-
Total	$	195,596	$	56,419	$	52,281	$	5,585	$	81,311
At December 31, 2011
Operating lease obligations (1)	$	300	$	300	$	-	$	-	$	-
FHLB advances and other borrowings (2)	169,200		17,890		51,348		11,309		88,653
Other long-term obligations (3)	3,447		1,770		1,677		-		-
Total	$	172,947	$	19,960	$	53,025	$	11,309	$	88,653

(1)Represents lease obligations for operations center (which was extended until January 2016 in June 2012), one loan production office and equipment.

(2)Includes principal and projected interest payments.

(3)Represents obligations to the Company’s third party data processing provider and other vendors.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets and short-term borrowing position based upon our assessment of: (1) expected loan demand; (2) expected deposit flows; (3) cash flows on our investments; (4) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities; and (5) the objectives of our asset/liability management policy. We use a variety of measures to assess our liquidity needs, which are provided to our Asset/Liability Management Committee on a regular basis. Our policy is to maintain net liquidity of at least 50% of our funding obligations over the next month. Additionally, our policy is to maintain an amount of cash and short-term marketable securities equal to at least 15% of net deposits and liabilities that will mature in one year or less.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets depend on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At September 30, 2012, cash and cash equivalents totaled $15.1 million. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $298.2 million at September 30, 2012.   In addition, at September 30, 2012, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $346.0 million from the FHLB of which we had $95.0 million outstanding.  As of September 30, 2012, the Bank also had a maximum borrowing capacity of $53.3 million with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, through the Discount Window.  Additionally, as of September 30, 2012, the Bank had overnight borrowing facilities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and the Federal Reserve Bank as well as federal funds lines of credit with three other commercial banks.

At September 30, 2012, we had $149.9 million in loan commitments outstanding, which consisted of $18.7 million in home equity and consumer loan commitments, $118.6 million in commercial loan commitments, $11.7 million in standby letters of credit, and $859,000 in commercial letters of credit.

Certificates of deposit due within one year of September 30, 2012 totaled $191.9 million, including $38.1 million of brokered deposits, representing 56.8% of certificates of deposit at September 30, 2012, an increase from 54.6% at June 30, 2012. We believe the large percentage of certificates of deposit that mature within one year reflect customers’ hesitancy to invest their funds for long periods in the current low interest rate environment. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before September 30, 2013.

Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase and sale of securities. Our primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts and borrowed funds. Deposit flows are affected by the overall levels of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage the pricing of

43

our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposit relationships. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates on certain deposit products to attract deposits.

The Bancorp is a separate entity and apart from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. As of September 30, 2012, the Bancorp had $19.6 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $19.2 million as of December 31, 2011.  The Bancorp’s cash and cash equivalents represent proceeds it retained from the Bank’s mutual-to-stock conversion completed in June 2010, a $7.9 million dividend, representing the Bank’s 2010 and 2011 net income, received from the Bank in April 2012 and a $1.9 million dividend, representing the Bank’s net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012, received from the Bank in September 2012.  In addition to its operating expenses, Bancorp may utilize its cash position for the payment of dividends or to repurchase common stock, subject to applicable restrictions.  Bancorp paid a cash dividend of $0.04 per outstanding share of common stock during each of the first three quarters of 2012.

The Bancorp can receive dividends from the Bank.  Payment of such dividends to the Bancorp by the Bank is limited under federal law. The amount that can be paid in any calendar year, without prior regulatory approval, cannot exceed the retained net earnings (as defined) for the year plus the preceding two calendar years. The Bancorp believes that such restriction will not have an impact on the Bancorp’s ability to meet its ongoing cash obligations.

Capital Management. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At September 30, 2012, the Bank exceeded all of regulatory capital requirements and was considered a “well capitalized” institution under regulatory guidelines.

The following table presents the Bank’s capital ratios and the minimum capital requirements to be considered ‘‘well capitalized” under applicable regulatory guidelines as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

		Minimum
		to be Well
	Ratio	Capitalized
September 30, 2012:
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.39%	>10.0%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	21.37%	> 6.0%
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted assets)	14.01%	> 5.0%
		Minimum
		to be Well
	Ratio	Capitalized
December 31, 2011:
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	23.90%	>10.0%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	22.88%	> 6.0%
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted assets)	15.30%	> 5.0%

Total stockholders’ equity to total assets was 17.1% at September 30, 2012 and 18.5% at December 31, 2011.  As a result of the mutual-to-stock conversion completed in June 2010, the Company has significant capital.  The Company’s financial condition and results of operations have been enhanced by the capital from the offering, resulting in increased net interest-earning assets.  However, the large increase in equity resulting from the capital raised in the conversion has and will continue to have an adverse impact on our return on equity until such funds can be deployed into higher yielding assets. The Company may use capital management tools such as cash dividends and share repurchases as well as improving operating income to increase its return on equity.

44

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, letters of credit and lines of credit.

For the period ended September 30, 2012, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

At September 30, 2012, there has not been any material change to the market risk disclosure from that contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”): (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  In addition, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business.  We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A significant amount of our loans are secured by property located on the Southern New Jersey barrier islands, which properties may have been damaged by Hurricane Sandy

As of September 30, 2012, the Company’s loan portfolio includes approximately $70 million of commercial loans and $50 million of residential and home equity mortgage loans, which combined represent approximately 17.5% of our total loan portfolio, to businesses and individuals located on the barrier islands of New Jersey in Atlantic and Cape May Counties.  The barrier islands of New Jersey were severely damaged by Hurricane Sandy from October 28, 2012 to October 31, 2012.  On most collateral dependent loans, our exposure is limited due to the existence of flood and property insurance.  We monitor our borrower’s insurance coverage on a regular basis and force place insurance, as necessary.  We are in the process of assessing the damage that may have occurred to the underlying properties and there is a risk that collateral for these loans has been damaged.  As of the date of this filing, the Company does not have the information required to determine the extent of potential loss related to these loans.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under the section “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC on March 12, 2012, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the SEC on August 6, 2012, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.  As of September 30, 2012, the risk factors of the Company have not changed materially from those reported in the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, except as described above.  The risks described in the Form 10-K and the Form 10-Q are not the only risks that we face.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

45

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table provides certain information with regard to shares repurchased by the Company in the third quarter of 2012:

			Total Number
			of Shares
			Purchased	Maximum
	Total		as Part of	Number of Shares
	Number of	Average	Publicly	that May Yet be
	Shares	Price Paid	Announced Plans or	Purchased Under
Period	Purchased	Per Share	Programs (1)	the Plans or Programs (1)
July 1, 2012 through
July 31, 2012	1,400	$13.99	1,400	789,101
August 1, 2012 through
August 31, 2012	118,500	$14.85	118,500	670,601
September 1, 2012 through
September 30, 2012	51,700	$14.83	51,700	618,901
Total	171,600	$14.83	171,600

(1) During 2011, the Company announced two repurchase programs under which it would repurchase, in the aggregate, up to 15% of the then-outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time, depending on market conditions. On April 25, 2012, the Board of Directors approved an additional stock repurchase plan (the “April 2012 Plan”) under which it would repurchase up to 5% of the then-outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (637,697 shares). Under these plans, through September 30, 2012, the Company has purchased a total of 2.2 million shares at a cost of $28.3 million. The April 2012 Plan will continue until it is completed or terminated by the Company’s Board of Directors

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (1)
3.2	Bylaws of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (1)
4.0	Stock Certificate of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (1)
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.0	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
101.0*	The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(1)Incorporated by reference to this document from the exhibits to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 as initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2010.

*Furnished, not filed.

46

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	FOX CHASE BANCORP, INC.
Dated: November 8, 2012	By:	/s/ Thomas M. Petro
		Thomas M. Petro
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer)
Dated: November 8, 2012	By:	/s/ Roger S. Deacon
		Roger S. Deacon
		Chief Financial Officer
		(principal financial officer)

47