XML 18 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels as follows: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table presents information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that have been measured at fair value, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs utilized to determine such fair value. The Company determines the fair value of the common stock warrants and contingent consideration using Level 3 inputs.
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2017 (in thousands):
Description
March 31, 2017
 
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
20,268

 
$
20,268

 
$

 
$

Restricted cash
10

 
10

 

 

Total assets
$
20,278

 
$
20,278


$


$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrant liability
$
2

 
$

 
$

 
$
2

Contingent consideration
46,600

 

 

 
46,600

Total liabilities
$
46,602

 
$

 
$

 
$
46,602

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Description
December 31, 2016
 
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
25,342

 
$
25,342

 
$

 
$

Restricted cash
10

 
10

 

 

Total assets
$
25,352

 
$
25,352

 
$

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrant liability
$
5

 
$

 
$

 
$
5

Contingent consideration
45,100

 

 

 
45,100

Total liabilities
$
45,105

 
$

 
$

 
$
45,105

Warrant Liability
The Company measures the fair value of the warrants classified as a liability at each reporting date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:
 
March 31,
2017
 
December 31, 2016
Risk-free interest rate
0.95
%
 
0.85
%
Expected dividend yield
%
 
%
Expected term (in years)
0.67

 
0.92

Expected volatility
81.42
%
 
83.39
%

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s common stock warrant liability, which represented a recurring measurement classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, wherein fair value was estimated using significant unobservable inputs (in thousands):
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017
$
5

Change in fair value
(3
)
Ending balance, March 31, 2017
$
2


The change in the fair value of the warrant liability is influenced primarily by the price of the underlying common stock. The change in fair value of $(3,000) and $(115,000) was recorded as other income in the accompanying condensed statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, none of the common stock warrants had been exercised.
Contingent consideration
In connection with the acquisition of Viventia, the Company recorded contingent consideration pertaining to the amounts potentially payable to Viventia's shareholders pursuant to the terms of the share purchase agreement. Contingent consideration is measured at fair value and is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The valuation of contingent consideration uses assumptions the Company believes would be made by a market participant. The Company assesses these estimates on an on-going basis as additional data impacting the assumptions is obtained. Future changes in the fair value of contingent consideration related to updated assumptions and estimates are recognized within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Contingent consideration may change significantly as development progresses and additional data are obtained, impacting the Company’s assumptions regarding probabilities of successful achievement of related milestones used to estimate the fair value of the liability and the timing in which they are expected to be achieved. In evaluating the fair value information, considerable judgment is required to interpret the market data used to develop the estimates. The estimates of fair value may not be indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. Accordingly, the use of different market assumptions and/or different valuation techniques could result in materially different fair value estimates. The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company's contingent consideration liability, which represented a recurring measurement classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, wherein fair value was estimated using significant unobservable inputs (in thousands):
Beginning balance, January 1, 2017
$
45,100

Loss from change in fair value of contingent consideration
1,500

Ending balance, March 31, 2017
$
46,600


The preliminary fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration was determined using probabilities of successful achievement of regulatory milestones and commercial sales, the period in which these milestones and sales are expected to be achieved ranging from 2019 to 2033, the level of commercial sales of Vicinium, and discount rates ranging from 9.3% to 11.5% as of December 31, 2016 and 9.2% to 10.4% as of March 31, 2017. Significant changes in any of these assumptions would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.
There have been no changes to the valuation methods utilized during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The Company evaluates transfers between levels at the end of each reporting period. There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between levels during the three months ended March 31, 2017.