10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
	OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
	OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period of _________ to _________

Commission File Number   001-34821

Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	36-4670835
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1211 West Morton Avenue
Jacksonville, Illinois	62650
(Address of principal executive office)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (217) 245-4111

Indicate by check whether issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x  Yes o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period the registrant was required to submit and post such filings).

x  Yes o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

o  Large Accelerated Filer	o  Accelerated Filer
o  Non-Accelerated Filer	x  Smaller Reporting Company

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o  Yes x  No

As of August 1, 2012, there were 1,920,955 shares of the Registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
	Results of Operations	38
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	53
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	55
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	56
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
Item 1.A.	Risk Factors
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.	Other Information
Item 6.	Exhibits
	Signatures	57
EXHIBITS
	Section 302 Certifications
	Section 906 Certification
	XBRL Instance Document
	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,298,031		$	11,387,947
Interest-earning time deposits in banks		2,972,000			2,476,000
Investment securities - available for sale		61,715,684			62,257,962
Mortgage-backed securities - available for sale		48,917,896			40,364,086
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800			1,113,800
Other investment securities		106,038			116,088
Loans held for sale - net		674,052			446,818
Loans receivable - net of allowance for loan losses of $3,130,503 and $3,296,607 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		172,029,486			170,865,102
Premises and equipment - net		5,586,334			5,532,720
Cash surrender value of life insurance		6,502,054			4,402,602
Accrued interest receivable		2,083,481			2,071,534
Goodwill		2,726,567			2,726,567
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net of valuation allowance of $148,983 and $173,791 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		668,247			697,733
Real estate owned		291,983			435,480
Deferred income taxes		108,944			413,110
Other assets		2,112,935			1,981,808
Total Assets	$	316,907,532		$	307,289,357
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits	$	261,552,747		$	254,240,060
Other borrowings		6,109,700			6,517,750
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		952,129			740,083
Accrued interest payable		323,926			349,121
Deferred compensation payable		3,467,536			3,295,827
Other liabilities		1,208,861			981,093
Total liabilities		273,614,899			266,123,934
Commitments and contingencies		-			-
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.01 par value - authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 1,922,156 shares as of June 30, 2012 and 1,920,955 shares as of December 31, 2011		19,222			19,210
Additional paid-in-capital		16,111,816			16,066,624
Retained earnings		24,246,970			22,767,719
Less: Unallocated ESOP shares		(349,830	)		(360,620	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,264,455			2,672,490
Total stockholders’ equity		43,292,633			41,165,423
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	316,907,532		$	307,289,357

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

 JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$	2,461,445	$	2,711,572	$	5,001,988	$	5,366,978
Investment securities		501,739		516,333		1,026,241		1,002,231
Mortgage-backed securities		252,869		366,951		458,194		646,715
Other		12,245		640		23,766		2,339
Total interest income		3,228,298		3,595,496		6,510,189		7,018,263
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		583,718		747,041		1,188,464		1,547,130
Other borrowings		3,892		5,238		6,683		9,865
Total interest expense		587,610		752,279		1,195,147		1,556,995
NET INTEREST INCOME		2,640,688		2,843,217		5,315,042		5,461,268
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		170,000		150,000		250,000		325,000
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES		2,470,688		2,693,217		5,065,042		5,136,268
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Fiduciary activities		60,944		57,688		138,720		117,708
Commission income		265,811		347,187		512,228		759,927
Service charges on deposit accounts		208,992		232,858		399,494		452,023
Mortgage banking operations, net		96,606		58,689		213,732		66,577
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities		301,580		55,713		526,908		109,218
Loan servicing fees		88,767		92,243		179,029		186,605
Other		163,083		130,331		320,057		267,414
Total non-interest income		1,185,783		974,709		2,290,168		1,959,472
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits		1,602,441		1,554,657		3,175,383		3,083,776
Occupancy and equipment		241,759		255,588		490,012		494,828
Data processing and telecommunications		140,551		137,935		270,194		284,361
Professional		81,821		46,226		133,250		96,607
Postage and office supplies		68,090		62,591		134,249		139,851
Deposit insurance premium		38,452		53,830		77,419		150,456
Other		337,581		283,858		647,289		574,466
Total non-interest expense		2,510,695		2,394,685		4,927,796		4,824,345
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		1,145,776		1,273,241		2,427,414		2,271,395
INCOME TAXES		298,713		368,407		665,601		631,822
NET INCOME	$	847,063	$	904,834	$	1,761,813	$	1,639,573
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
Net Income	$	847,063	$	904,834	$	1,761,813	$	1,639,573
Other Comprehensive Income
Unrealized appreciation on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $431,054 and $716,438 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $484,101 and $886,256 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.		836,753		1,390,735		939,724		1,720,380
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income, net of taxes of $102,537 and $18,942, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $179,149 and $37,134 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.		199,043		36,771		347,759		72,084
		637,710		1,353,964		591,965		1,648,296
Comprehensive Income	$	1,484,773	$	2,258,798	$	2,353,778	$	3,287,869

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

											Accumulated
			Additional								Other		Total
	Common		Paid-in		Retained			Unallocated			Comprehensive		Stockholders’
(Unaudited)	Stock		Capital		Earnings			ESOP Shares			Income		Equity
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2011	$	19,210	$	16,066,624	$	22,767,719		$	(360,620	)	$	2,672,490	$	41,165,423
Net Income		-		-		1,761,813			-			-		1,761,813
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-			-			591,965		591,965
Exercise of stock options		12		15,487		-			-			-		15,499
Tax benefit of non-qualified options		-		1,291		-			-			-		1,291
Vesting options expense		-		22,479		-			-			-		22,479
Shares held by ESOP, commited to be released		-		5,935		-			10,790			-		16,725
Dividends ($0.15 per share)		-		-		(282,562	)		-			-		(282,562	)
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2012	$	19,222	$	16,111,816	$	24,246,970		$	(349,830	)	$	3,264,455	$	43,292,633

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	1,761,813		$	1,639,573
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion:
Premises and equipment		166,365			155,589
Amortization of investment premiums and discounts, net		334,966			225,574
Accretion of loan discounts		(37,228	)		(2,901	)
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities		(526,908	)		(109,218	)
Provision for loan losses		250,000			325,000
Mortgage banking operations, net		(213,732	)		(66,577	)
Gain on sale of real estate owned		(30,609	)		(31,142	)
Shares held by ESOP commited to be released		16,725			13,127
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised		1,291			4,609
Stock option compensation expense		22,479			-
Changes in income taxes payable		(205,437	)		(7,178	)
Changes in assets and liabilities		357,497			(393,449	)
Net cash provided by operations before loan sales		1,897,222			1,753,007
Origination of loans for sale to secondary market		(23,066,615	)		(7,348,818	)
Proceeds from sales of loans to secondary market		23,082,599			7,467,242
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,913,206			1,871,431
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment and mortgage-backed securities		(33,802,052	)		(33,369,259	)
Purchases of interest-earning time deposits in other banks		(496,000	)		-
Maturity or call of investment securities available-for-sale		7,328,000			6,255,000
Sale of investment securities available-for-sale		14,854,329			16,910,803
Principal payments on mortgage-backed and investment securities		4,707,101			3,589,255
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance		(2,000,000	)		-
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned		327,395			198,699
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(1,551,536	)		1,141,405
Additions to premises and equipment		(219,979	)		(130,758	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(10,852,742	)		(5,404,855	)

(Continued)

5

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits	$	7,312,687		$	183,095
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings		(408,050	)		135,227
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		212,046			86,009
Exercise of stock options		15,499			211,568
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock related to stock options		-			(181,941	)
Dividends paid - common stock		(282,562	)		(279,546	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		6,849,620			154,412
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(2,089,916	)		(3,379,012	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR		11,387,947			8,943,400
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	9,298,031		$	5,564,388
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest on deposits	$	1,213,658		$	1,695,106
Interest on other borrowings		6,683			9,801
Income taxes paid		872,000			589,000
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	217,130		$	391,246
Loans to facilitate sales of real estate owned		42,750			131,834

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jacksonville Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Financial Resources Group, Inc. collectively (the “Company”).  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

In the opinion of management, the preceding unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and the results of its operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.  The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed in March, 2012.  The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and to prevailing practices within the industry.

Certain amounts included in the 2011 consolidated statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation.

2.   NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements by U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of FASB ASC Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed.  This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively.  For public entities, the amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early application by public entities was not permitted.  The adoption of this ASU is reflected in Note 8 – Disclosures about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income.  Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income.  This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.  The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.  The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively.  For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early adoption was permitted.  The Company retrospectively adopted the ASU during the first quarter of 2012 with separate condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

7

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment.  The update provides entities with the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.  However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit.  If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.  Under the amendments in ASU No. 2011-08, an entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test.  An entity may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.  The amendments enacted by ASU No. 2011-08 are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for the nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.  The adoption of this update did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.  ASU 2011-11 requires an entity to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement.  ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Retrospective disclosure is required for all comparative periods presented.  The adoption of this update did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

8

3.   EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings Per Share - Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares.  Diluted earnings per share considers the potential effects of the exercise of the outstanding stock options under the Company’s stock option plans.

The following reflects earnings per share calculations for basic and diluted methods:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income available to common shareholders	$	847,063	$	904,834	$	1,761,813	$	1,639,573
Basic average shares outstanding		1,886,211		1,891,706		1,885,638		1,888,670
Diluted potential common shares:
Stock option equivalents		475		-		326		-
Diluted average shares outstanding		1,886,686		1,891,706		1,885,964		1,888,670
Basic earnings per share	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87

Stock options for 104,035 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2012, because they were anti-dilutive.  Stock options for 4,504 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, because they were anti-dilutive.

9

4.   STOCK–BASED COMPENSATION

In connection with our 2010 second step conversion and related stock offering, the Bank purchased an additional 41,614 shares for its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees.  The ESOP borrowed funds from the Company in an amount sufficient to purchase the 41,614 shares (approximately 4% of the common stock issued in the offering).  The loan is secured by the shares purchased and will be repaid by the ESOP with funds from contributions made by the Bank and dividends received by the ESOP, with funds from any contributions on ESOP assets.  Contributions will be applied to repay interest on the loan first, and the remainder will be applied to principal.  The loan is expected to be repaid over a period of up to 20 years.  Shares purchased with the loan proceeds are held in a suspense account for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid.  Contributions to the ESOP and shares released from the suspense account are allocated among participants in proportion to their compensation, relative to total compensation of all active participants.  Participants will vest on a pro-rata basis and reach 100% vesting in the accrued benefits under the ESOP after six years.  Vesting is accelerated upon retirement, death, or disability of the participant or a change in control of the Bank.  Forfeitures will be reallocated to remaining plan participants.  Benefits may be payable upon retirement, death, disability, separation from service, or termination of the ESOP.  Since the Bank’s annual contributions are discretionary, benefits payable under the ESOP cannot be estimated.

In the event a terminated ESOP participant desires to sell his or her shares of the Company’s stock, the ESOP includes a put option, which is a right to demand that the Company buy any shares of its stock distributed to participants at fair value.

The Company is accounting for its ESOP in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Employers Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.”  Accordingly, the debt of the ESOP is eliminated in consolidation and the shares pledged as collateral are reported as unearned ESOP shares in the consolidated balance sheet.  Contributions to the ESOP shall be sufficient to pay principal and interest currently due under the loan agreement.  As shares are committed to be released from the collateral, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares for the respective period, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations.  Dividends, if any, on unallocated shares are recorded as a reduction of debt and accrued interest.

A summary of ESOP shares at June 30, 2012 and 2011 is shown below.

	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Unearned shares		34,983		38,495
Shares committed for release		1,079		1,038
Allocated shares		52,815		49,344
Total ESOP shares		88,877		88,877
Fair value of unearned shares	$	591,213	$	481,188

On April 24, 2012, the compensation committee of the board of directors approved the awards of 104,035 options to purchase Company common stock.  The stock options vest over a five-year period and expire ten years after issuance.  Apart from the vesting schedule, there are no performance-based conditions or any other material conditions applicable to the options issued.

10

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Instrinsic
	Options			Price/Share		Life (in years)		Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		4,504		$	13.98
Granted		104,035			15.65
Exercised		(1,201	)		13.98
Forfeited		-			-
Outstanding, June 30, 2012		107,338		$	15.60		9.75	$	139,539
Exercisable, June 30, 2012		3,303		$	13.98		2.00	$	9,645

Intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value and the exercise price.  The value is based upon a closing price of $16.90 per share on June 30, 2012.

The fair value for each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model that uses the following assumptions.  The Company uses the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant to determine the risk-free interest rate.  The expected dividend yield is estimated using the projected annual dividend level and the recent stock price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant.  Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s stock.  The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding.

The weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the year indicated were as follows:

	2012
Risk-free interest rate		1.37	%
Expected dividend yield		2.19	%
Expected stock volatility		33.41	%
Expected life (years)		7.00
Fair value	$	4.34

11

5.   LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio is shown below.

	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Amount			Percent			Amount		Percent
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	41,293,201			24.0	%	$	39,472,008		23.1	%
Commercial		37,868,011			22.0			40,169,813		23.5
Agricultural		32,612,241			19.0			29,971,649		17.5
Home equity		14,226,553			8.3			16,042,788		9.4
Total real estate loans		126,000,006			73.2			125,656,258		73.5
Commercial loans		23,953,566			13.9			23,198,454		13.6
Agricultural loans		10,263,526			6.0			9,590,745		5.6
Consumer loans		14,939,089			8.7			15,755,973		9.2
Total loans receivable		175,156,187			101.8			174,201,430		102.0
Less:
Net deferred loan fees		(3,802	)		(0.0	)		39,721		0.0
Allowance for loan losses		3,130,503			1.8			3,296,607		1.9
Total loans receivable, net	$	172,029,486			100.0	%	$	170,865,102		100.0	%

The Company believes that sound loans are a necessary and desirable means of employing funds available for investment.  Recognizing the Company’s obligations to its depositors and to the communities it serves, authorized personnel are expected to seek to develop and make sound, profitable loans that resources permit and that opportunity affords.  The Company maintains lending policies and procedures in place designed to focus lending efforts on the types, locations, and duration of loans most appropriate for the business model and markets.  The Company’s principal lending activities include the origination of one-to four-family residential mortgage loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, agricultural loans, home equity lines of credits, commercial business loans, and consumer loans.  The primary lending market includes the Illinois counties of Morgan, Macoupin and Montgomery.  Generally, loans are collateralized by assets, primarily real estate, of the borrowers and guaranteed by individuals.  The loans are expected to be repaid from cash flows of the borrowers or from proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers.

Loan originations are derived from a number of sources such as real estate broker referrals, existing customers, builders, attorneys and walk-in customers.  Upon receipt of a loan application, a credit report is obtained to verify specific information relating to the applicant’s employment, income, and credit standing.  In the case of a real estate loan, an appraisal of the real estate intended to secure the proposed loan is undertaken by an independent appraiser approved by the Company.  A loan application file is first reviewed by a loan officer in the loan department who checks applications for accuracy and completeness, and verifies the information provided.  The financial resources of the borrower and the borrower’s credit history, as well as the collateral securing the loan, are considered an integral part of each risk evaluation prior to approval.  The board of directors has established individual lending authorities for each loan officer by loan type.  Loans over an individual officer’s lending limits must be approved by the officers’ loan committee consisting of the chairman of the board, president, chief lending officer and all lending officers, which meets three times a week, and has lending authority up to $500,000 depending on the type of loan.  Loans with a principal balance over this limit, up to $1.0 million, must be approved by the directors’ loan committee, which meets weekly and consists of the chairman of the board, president, senior vice president, chief lending officer and at least two outside directors, plus all lending officers as non-voting members.  The board of directors approves all loans with a principal balance over $1.0 million.  The board of directors ratifies all loans that are originated.  Once the loan is approved, the applicant is informed and a closing date is scheduled.  Loan commitments are typically funded within 30 days.

12

If the loan is approved, the borrower must provide proof of fire and casualty insurance on the property serving as collateral which insurance must be maintained during the full term of the loan; flood insurance is required in certain instances.  Title insurance or an attorney’s opinion based on a title search of the property is generally required on loans secured by real property.

One–to-Four Family Mortgage Loans - Historically, the primary lending origination activity has been one-to-four family, owner-occupied, residential mortgage loans secured by property located in the Company’s market area.  The Company generates loans through marketing efforts, existing customers and referrals, real estate brokers, builders and local businesses.  Generally, one-to-four family loan originations are limited to the financing of loans secured by properties located within the Company’s market area.  

Fixed-rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans are generally conforming loans, underwritten according to Freddie Mac guidelines.  The Company generally originates both fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits established by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for Freddie Mac.

The Company originates for resale to Freddie Mac fixed-rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or more.  The fixed-rate mortgage loans amortize monthly with principal and interest due each month.  Residential real estate loans often remain outstanding for significantly shorter periods than their contractual terms because borrowers may refinance or prepay loans at their option.  The Company offers fixed-rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years without prepayment penalty.

The Company currently offers adjustable-rate mortgage loans for terms ranging up to 30 years.  They generally offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans that adjust between one and five years on the anniversary date of origination.  Interest rate adjustments are up to two hundred basis points per year, with a cap of up to six hundred basis points on interest rate increases over the life of the loan.  In a rising interest rate environment, such rate limitations may prevent adjustable-rate mortgage loans from repricing to market interest rates, which would have an adverse effect on the net interest income.  In the low interest rate environment that has existed over the past two years, the adjustable-rate portfolio has repriced downward resulting in lower interest income from this portion of the loan portfolio.  The Company has used different interest indices for adjustable-rate mortgage loans in the past such as the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of one year, three years or five years.  The origination of fixed-rate mortgage loans versus adjustable-rate mortgage loans is monitored on an ongoing basis and is affected significantly by the level of market interest rates, customer preference, interest rate risk position and competitors’ loan products.

Adjustable-rate mortgage loans make the loan portfolio more interest rate sensitive and provide an alternative for those borrowers who meet the underwriting criteria, but are unable to qualify for a fixed-rate mortgage.  However, as the interest income earned on adjustable-rate mortgage loans varies with prevailing interest rates, such loans do not offer predictable cash flows in the same manner as long-term, fixed-rate loans.  Adjustable-rate mortgage loans carry increased credit risk associated with potentially higher monthly payments by borrowers as general market interest rates increase.  It is possible that during periods of rising interest rates that the risk of delinquencies and defaults on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest costs to the borrower, resulting in increased loan losses.

13

Residential first mortgage loans customarily include due-on-sale clauses, which gives the Company the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells or otherwise disposes of the underlying real property serving as collateral for the loan.  Due-on-sale clauses are a means of imposing assumption fees and increasing the interest rate on mortgage portfolio during periods of rising interest rates.

When underwriting residential real estate loans, the Company reviews and verifies each loan applicant’s income and credit history.  Management believes that stability of income and past credit history are integral parts in the underwriting process.  Generally, the applicant’s total monthly mortgage payment, including all escrow amounts, is limited to 28% of the applicant’s total monthly income.  In addition, total monthly obligations of the applicant, including mortgage payments, should not generally exceed 38% of total monthly income.  Written appraisals are generally required on real estate property offered to secure an applicant’s loan.  For one-to-four family real estate loans with loan to value ratios of over 80%, private mortgage insurance is required. Fire and casualty insurance is also required on all properties securing real estate loans.  Title insurance, or an attorney’s title opinion, may be required, as circumstances warrant.

The Company does not offer an “interest only” mortgage loan product on one-to-four family residential properties (where the borrower pays interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan).  They also do not offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan.  The Company does not offer a “subprime loan” program (loans that generally target borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (traditionally defined as loans having less than full documentation).

Commercial Real Estate Loans - The Company originates and purchases commercial real estate loans.  Commercial real estate loans are secured primarily by improved properties such as multi-family residential, retail facilities and office buildings, restaurants and other non-residential buildings.  The maximum loan-to-value ratio for commercial real estate loans originated is generally 80%.  Commercial real estate loans are generally written up to terms of five years with adjustable interest rates.  The rates are generally tied to the prime rate and generally have a specified floor.  Many of the fixed-rate commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and therefore require a “balloon” payment at maturity.  The Company purchases from time to time commercial real estate loan participations primarily from outside the Company’s market area. All participation loans are approved following a review to ensure that the loan satisfies the underwriting standards.

Underwriting standards for commercial real estate loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The income approach is primarily utilized to determine whether income generated from the applicant’s business or real estate offered as collateral is adequate to repay the loan.  There is an emphasis on the ratio of the property’s projected net cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%).  In underwriting a loan, the value of the real estate offered as collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount is considered.  Generally, the loan amount cannot be greater than 80% of the value of the real estate.  Written appraisals are usually obtained from either licensed or certified appraisers on all commercial real estate loans in excess of $250,000.  Creditworthiness of the applicant is assessed by reviewing a credit report, financial statements and tax returns of the applicant, as well as obtaining other public records regarding the applicant.

Loans secured by commercial real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and carry larger loan balances.  This increased credit risk is a result of several factors, including the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties and the successful operation or management of the properties securing the loans.  Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related business and real estate property.  If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

14

Agricultural Real Estate Loans - The Company originates and purchases agricultural real estate loans.  The maximum loan-to-value ratio for agricultural real estate loans we originate is generally 80%. Our agricultural real estate loans are generally written up to terms of five years with adjustable interest rates.  The rates are generally tied to the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of one-year, three-years, or five-years and generally have a specified floor. Many of our fixed-rate agricultural real estate loans are not fully amortizing and therefore require a “balloon” payment at maturity. We purchase from time to time agricultural real estate loan participations primarily from other local institutions within our market area. All participation loans are approved following a review to ensure that the loan satisfies our underwriting standards

Underwriting standards for agricultural real estate include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The income approach is primarily utilized to determine whether income generated from the applicant’s farm operation or real estate offered as collateral is adequate to repay the loan. We emphasize the ratio of the property’s projected cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%).  In underwriting a loan, we consider the value of the real estate offered as collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.  Generally, the loan amount cannot be greater than 80% of the value of the real estate.  We usually obtain written appraisals from either licensed or certified appraisers on all agricultural real estate loans in excess of $250,000.  We assess the creditworthiness of the applicant by reviewing a credit report, financial statements and tax returns of the applicant, as well as obtaining other public records regarding the applicant.

Loans secured by agricultural real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and carry larger loan balances.  This increased credit risk is a result of several factors, including the effects of general economic and market conditions on farm operations and the successful operation or management of the properties securing the loans.  The repayment of loans secured by agricultural estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the farm and real estate property.  If the cash flow is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

Home Equity Loans – The Company originates home equity and lines of credit, which are generally secured by the borrower’s principal residence.  The maximum amount of a home equity loan or line of credit is generally 95% of the appraised value of a borrower’s real estate collateral less the amount of any prior mortgages or related liabilities.  Home equity loans and lines of credit are approved with both fixed and adjustable interest rates which we determine based upon market conditions.  Such loans may be fully amortized over the life of the loan or have a balloon feature.  Generally, the maximum term for home equity loans is 10 years.

Underwriting standards for home equity loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income.  We also consider the length of employment with the borrower’s present employer as well as the amount of time the borrower has lived in the local area.  Creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration; however, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

15

Home equity loans entail greater risks than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, which are secured by first lien mortgages.  In such cases, collateral repossessed after a default may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of damage or depreciation in the value of the property or loss of equity to the first lien position.  Further, home equity loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.  Finally, the application of various Federal and state laws, including Federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans in the event of a default.

Commercial Business Loans - The Company originates commercial business loans to borrowers located in the Company’s market area which are secured by collateral other than real estate or which can be unsecured.  Commercial business loan participations are also purchased from other lenders, which may be made to borrowers outside the Company’s market area.  Commercial business loans are generally secured by equipment and inventory and generally are offered with adjustable rates tied to the prime rate or the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of either one-year, three-years or five-years and various terms of maturity generally from three years to five years.  Unsecured business loans are originated on a limited basis in those instances where the applicant’s financial strength and creditworthiness has been established.  Commercial business loans generally bear higher interest rates than residential loans, but they also may involve a higher risk of default since their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business.  Personal guarantees are generally obtained from the borrower or a third party as a condition to originating its business loans.  

Underwriting standards for commercial and agricultural business loans include a determination of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan from normal cash flows generated in the applicant’s business.  Financial strength of each applicant is assessed through the review of financial statements and tax returns provided by the applicant.  The creditworthiness of an applicant is derived from a review of credit reports as well as a search of public records.  Business loans are periodically reviewed following origination.  Financial statements are requested at least annually and review them for substantial deviations or changes that might affect repayment of the loan.  Loan officers also visit the premises of borrowers to observe the business premises, facilities, and personnel and to inspect the pledged collateral.  Underwriting standards for business loans are different for each type of loan depending on the financial strength of the applicant and the value of collateral offered as security.

Agricultural Business Loans - The Company originates agricultural business loans to borrowers located in our market area which are secured by collateral other than real estate or which can be unsecured. Agricultural business loans are generally secured by equipment and blanket security agreements on all farm assets.  These loans are generally offered with fixed rates with terms up to five years.  Agricultural business loans generally bear lower interest rates than residential loans due to competitive market pressures.  The repayment of agricultural business loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the farm operation.  Personal guarantees are generally obtained from the borrower as a condition to originating agricultural business loans.

Underwriting standards for agricultural business loans include a determination of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan from normal cash flows generated in the applicant’s business.  The financial strength of each applicant is assessed through the review of financial statements, pro-forma cash flow statements, and tax returns provided by the applicant.  The creditworthiness of an applicant is derived from a review of credit reports as well as a search of public records.  Financial statements are requested at least annually and reviewed for substantial deviations or changes that might affect repayment of the loan.  Loan officers may also visit the premises of borrowers to observe the operation, facilities, equipment, and personnel and to inspect the pledged collateral.  Underwriting standards for agricultural business loans are different for each type of loan depending on the financial strength of the applicant and the value of collateral offered as security.

16

Current drought conditions are expected to reduce 2012 crop yields.  The repayment of agricultural business loans generally is dependent on the successful operation of a farm and can be adversely affected by fluctuations in crop prices, increase in interest rates, and changes in weather conditions.  These developments may result in smaller harvests and less income for farmers which may adversely affect such borrower’s ability to repay a loan, and potentially result in an increase in the level of problem loans and loan losses in our agricultural portfolio.  While not required, the majority of our agricultural business loans are covered by crop insurance, which provides protection against loss due to lower crop yields as a result of drought conditions.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact these conditions may have on its agricultural customers and to the local economy.

Consumer Loans – The Company originates consumer loans, including automobile loans, loans secured by deposit accounts, unsecured loans and mobile home loans.  Consumer loans are generally offered on a fixed-rate basis.  Automobile loans are offered with maturities of up to 60 months for new automobiles.  Loans secured by used automobiles will have maximum terms which vary depending upon the age of the automobile.  Automobile loans are generally originated with a loan-to-value ratio below the greater of 80% of the purchase price or 100% of NADA loan value.  In the case of a new car loan, the loan-to-value ratio may be greater or less depending on the borrower’s credit history, debt to income ratio, home ownership and other banking relationships with us.

Underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income.  We also consider the length of employment with the borrower’s present employer as well as the amount of time the borrower has lived in the local area.  Creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration; however, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Consumer loans entail greater risks than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, particularly consumer loans secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles or loans that are unsecured.  In such cases, collateral repossessed after a default may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of damage, loss or depreciation.  Further, consumer loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.  Such events would increase our risk of loss on unsecured loans.  Finally, the application of various Federal and state laws, including Federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans in the event of a default.

17

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2012, June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Home Equity			Commercial		Agricultural			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance, April 1, 2012	$	667,641		$	1,098,838		$	123,105		$	349,467		$	708,016	$	62,562		$	128,927		$	192,355		$	3,330,911
Provision charged to expense		11,488			119,900			(74,187	)		(9,516	)		103,614		(26,528	)		80,192			(34,963	)		170,000
Losses charged off		(70,295	)		(257,043	)		-			(20,000	)		-		-			(50,421	)		-			(397,759	)
Recoveries		20,618			-			-			5,980			-		-			753			-			27,351
Ending balance, June 30, 2012	$	629,452		$	961,695		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	811,630	$	36,034		$	159,451		$	157,392		$	3,130,503
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2012	$	697,223		$	1,107,585		$	115,154		$	309,409		$	711,864	$	58,428		$	138,385		$	158,559		$	3,296,607
Provision charged to expense		(19,719	)		111,153			(66,236	)		76,761			99,450		(22,394	)		72,152			(1,167	)		250,000
Losses charged off		(70,295	)		(257,043	)		-			(66,744	)		-		-			(53,385	)		-			(447,467	)
Recoveries		22,243			-			-			6,505			316		-			2,299			-			31,363
Ending balance, June 30, 2012	$	629,452		$	961,695		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	811,630	$	36,034		$	159,451		$	157,392		$	3,130,503
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	-		$	137,608		$	-		$	-		$	515,688	$	-		$	7,359		$	-		$	660,655
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	629,452		$	824,087		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	295,942	$	36,034		$	152,092		$	157,392		$	2,469,848
Loans:
Ending balance	$	41,293,201		$	37,868,011		$	32,612,241		$	14,226,553		$	23,953,566	$	10,263,526		$	14,939,089		$	-		$	175,156,187
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	286,800		$	1,389,183		$	-		$	58,090		$	752,809	$	-		$	7,359		$	-		$	2,494,241
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	41,006,401		$	36,478,828		$	32,612,241		$	14,168,463		$	23,200,757	$	10,263,526		$	14,931,730		$	-		$	172,661,946

18

	June 30, 2011
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate		Home Equity			Commercial			Agricultural		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance, April 1, 2011	$	514,330		$	1,093,553		$	104,867	$	267,660		$	506,317		$	141,044	$	121,873		$	129,606	$	2,879,250
Provision charged to expense		72,461			50,535			7,341		8,713			(52,393	)		11,375		4,490			47,478		150,000
Losses charged off		(24,809	)		-			-		-			-			-		-			-		(24,809	)
Recoveries		-			700			-		1,275			153,609			-		801			-		156,385
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	561,982		$	1,144,788		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	607,533		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	3,160,826
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2011	$	561,309		$	1,193,928		$	92,988	$	300,257		$	472,376		$	58,250	$	163,690		$	121,487	$	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense		32,884			202,803			19,220		(23,589	)		(18,652	)		94,169		(37,432	)		55,597		325,000
Losses charged off		(32,211	)		(260,785	)		-		(4,162	)		-			-		(1,097	)		-		(298,255	)
Recoveries		-			8,842			-		5,142			153,809			-		2,003			-		169,796
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	561,982		$	1,144,788		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	607,533		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	3,160,826
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	89,795		$	314,285		$	-	$	-		$	227,698		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	631,778
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	472,187		$	830,503		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	379,835		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	2,529,048
Loans:
Ending balance	$	38,208,843		$	43,011,180		$	31,632,558	$	17,939,927		$	22,430,621		$	8,503,056	$	16,194,069		$	-	$	177,920,254
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	639,589		$	1,754,057		$	-	$	-		$	570,677		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	2,964,323
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	37,569,254		$	41,257,123		$	31,632,558	$	17,939,927		$	21,859,944		$	8,503,056	$	16,194,069		$	-	$	174,955,931

19

	December 31, 2011
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate		Home Equity			Commercial		Agricultural		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	561,309		$	1,193,928		$	92,988	$	300,257		$	472,376	$	58,250	$	163,690		$	121,487	$	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense		266,296			195,118			22,166		26,863			83,654		178		(6,347	)		37,072		625,000
Losses charged off		(130,382	)		(306,303	)		-		(24,904	)		-		-		(25,289	)		-		(486,878	)
Recoveries		-			24,842			-		7,193			155,834		-		6,331			-		194,200
Balance, end of year	$	697,223		$	1,107,585		$	115,154	$	309,409		$	711,864	$	58,428	$	138,385		$	158,559	$	3,296,607
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	36,300		$	357,880		$	-	$	-		$	296,149	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	690,329
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	660,923		$	749,705		$	115,154	$	309,409		$	415,715	$	58,428	$	138,385		$	158,559	$	2,606,278
Loans:
Ending balance	$	39,472,008		$	40,169,813		$	29,971,649	$	16,042,788		$	23,198,454	$	9,590,745	$	15,755,973		$	-	$	174,201,430
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	551,921		$	1,727,406		$	-	$	29,353		$	552,814	$	-	$	7,569		$	-	$	2,869,063
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	38,920,087		$	38,442,407		$	29,971,649	$	16,013,435		$	22,645,640	$	9,590,745	$	15,748,404		$	-	$	171,332,367

Management’s opinion as to the ultimate collectability of loans is subject to estimates regarding future cash flows from operations and the value of property, real and personal, pledged as collateral.  These estimates are affected by changing economic conditions and the economic prospects of borrowers.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date.  The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings.  Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed.  Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions.  This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of allocated and general components.  The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired.  For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

20

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the scheduled payments of principal or interest will not be able to be collected when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the group’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans.  Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment measurements, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.

The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given the internal risk rating process.  The loan portfolio is stratified into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss characteristics and an appropriate loss ratio adjusted for other qualitative factors is applied to the homogeneous pools of loans to estimate the incurred losses in the loan portfolio.  

There have been no changes to the Company’s accounting policies or methodology from the prior periods.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends among other factors.  The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk.  This analysis is performed on all loans at origination.  In addition, lending relationships over $500,000, new commercial and commercial real estate loans, and watch list credits are reviewed annually by our loan review department in order to verify risk ratings.  The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention.  If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt.  They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

21

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be Pass rated loans.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	1-4 Family				Commercial Real Estate				Agricultural Real Estate				Home Equity
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Rating:
Pass	$	38,761,356	$	36,040,795	$	34,980,711	$	36,936,906	$	32,612,241	$	29,567,057	$	13,095,024	$	14,746,631
Special Mention		1,221,466		1,642,602		582,523		574,484		-		404,592		169,610		278,323
Substandard		1,310,379		1,788,611		2,304,777		2,658,423		-		-		961,919		1,017,834
Total	$	41,293,201	$	39,472,008	$	37,868,011	$	40,169,813	$	32,612,241	$	29,971,649	$	14,226,553	$	16,042,788
	Commercial				Agricultural				Consumer				Total
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Rating:
Pass	$	23,019,375	$	22,253,904	$	10,158,226	$	9,336,899	$	14,725,790	$	15,409,729	$	167,352,723	$	164,291,921
Special Mention		18,485		3,402		105,300		253,846		74,075		153,316		2,171,459		3,310,565
Substandard		915,706		941,148		-		-		139,224		192,928		5,632,005		6,598,944
Total	$	23,953,566	$	23,198,454	$	10,263,526	$	9,590,745	$	14,939,089	$	15,755,973	$	175,156,187	$	174,201,430

The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio aging analysis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90		Total						Total Loans >90
	Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Days & Accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	496,878	$	100,178	$	264,707	$	861,763	$	40,431,438	$	41,293,201	$	-
Commercial real estate		91,177		-		46,778		137,955		37,730,056		37,868,011		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-		32,612,241		32,612,241		-
Home equity		145,859				452,108		597,967		13,628,586		14,226,553		-
Commercial		-		-		16,576		16,576		23,936,990		23,953,566		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		10,263,526		10,263,526		-
Consumer		154,184		6,950		15,177		176,311		14,762,778		14,939,089		-
Total	$	888,098	$	107,128	$	795,346	$	1,790,572	$	173,365,615	$	175,156,187	$	-

22

	December 31, 2011
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90		Total						Total Loans >90
	Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Days & Accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	289,337	$	161,654	$	1,020,862	$	1,471,853	$	38,000,155	$	39,472,008	$	-
Commercial real estate		75,924		-		48,428		124,352		40,045,461		40,169,813		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-		29,971,649		29,971,649		-
Home equity		511,562		50,455		197,191		759,208		15,283,580		16,042,788		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		23,198,454		23,198,454		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		9,590,745		9,590,745		-
Consumer		156,404		126,077		37,337		319,818		15,436,155		15,755,973		-
Total	$	1,033,227	$	338,186	$	1,303,818	$	2,675,231	$	171,526,199	$	174,201,430	$	-

The accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection.  Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan.  In all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged-off at the earlier date if collection of principal and interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged-off are reversed against interest income.  The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual.  Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

           A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan.  Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.

Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of the expected future cash flows, the loan’s observable market value, or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses.  Significant restructured loans are considered impaired in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

The Company actively seeks to reduce its investment in impaired loans.  The primary tools to work through impaired loans are settlement with the borrowers or guarantors, foreclosure of the underlying collateral, or restructuring.

The Company will restructure loans when the borrower demonstrates the inability to comply with the terms of the loan, but can demonstrate the ability to meet acceptable restructured terms.  Restructurings generally include one or more of the following restructuring options; reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.  Restructured loans in compliance with modified terms are classified as impaired.

23

The following tables present impaired loans at or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	286,800	$	286,800	$	-	$	287,253	$	4,238	$	4,427
Commercial real estate		293,163		293,163		-		298,241		14,445		14,546
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		72,018		1,556		1,619
Loans with a specific allowance:
Commercial real estate		1,096,020		1,096,020		137,608		1,144,327		10,365		9,385
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		786,002		15,369		23,374
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,491		145		200
Total:
One-to-four family residential		286,800		286,800		-		287,253		4,238		4,427
Commercial real estate		1,389,183		1,389,183		137,608		1,442,568		24,810		23,931
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		786,002		15,369		23,374
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		72,018		1,556		1,619
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,491		145		200
Total	$	2,494,241	$	2,494,241	$	660,655	$	2,595,332	$	46,118	$	53,551

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	286,800	$	286,800	$	-	$	287,387	$	6,694	$	6,714
Commercial real estate		293,163		293,163		-		310,295		15,298		15,462
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		70,889		2,287		2,368
Loans with a specific allowance:
Commercial real estate		1,096,020		1,096,020		137,608		1,146,774		34,593		34,675
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		791,202		24,434		32,485
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,530		313		300
Total:
One-to-four family residential		286,800		286,800		-		287,387		6,694		6,714
Commercial real estate		1,389,183		1,389,183		137,608		1,457,069		49,891		50,137
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		791,202		24,434		32,485
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		70,889		2,287		2,368
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,530		313		300
Total	$	2,494,241	$	2,494,241	$	660,655	$	2,614,077	$	83,619	$	92,004

24

	December 31, 2011
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	235,856	$	235,856	$	-	$	249,103	$	10,446	$	11,162
Commercial real estate		69,249		69,249		-		71,972		457		254
Home equity		29,353		29,353		-		21,954		1,933		1,605
Loans with a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential		316,065		316,065		36,300		368,040		25,241		18,341
Commercial real estate		1,658,157		1,658,157		357,880		1,726,905		88,084		117,289
Commercial		552,814		552,814		296,149		592,796		37,192		36,628
Consumer		7,569		7,569		-		7,569		37		-
Total:
One-to-four family residential		551,921		551,921		36,300		617,143		35,687		29,503
Commercial real estate		1,727,406		1,727,406		357,880		1,798,877		88,541		117,543
Commercial		552,814		552,814		296,149		592,796		37,192		36,628
Home equity		7,569		7,569		-		7,569		37		-
Consumer		29,353		29,353		-		21,954		1,933		1,605
Total	$	2,869,063	$	2,869,063	$	690,329	$	3,038,339	$	163,390	$	185,279

Included in certain loan categories in the impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties, that were classified as impaired.   These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  TDR’s are considered impaired at the time of restructuring and typically are returned to accrual status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period of at least six months.

When loans are modified into a TDR, the Company evaluates any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or based upon on the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans.  If the Company determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.  In periods subsequent to modification, the Company evaluates all TDR’s, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognizes impairment through the allowance.

25

The following table presents the recorded balance, at original cost, of TDR’s, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	245,211	$	213,966
Commercial real estate		1,030,405		1,075,483
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		111,349		125,588
Commercial loans		725,714		477,798
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		96,155		83,962
Total	$	2,208,834	$	1,976,797

The following table presents the recorded balance, at original cost, of TDR’s, which were performing according to the terms of the restructuring, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	245,211	$	131,990
Commercial real estate		1,002,405		1,007,723
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		101,530		95,769
Commercial loans		725,714		477,798
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		21,623		83,962
Total	$	2,096,483	$	1,797,242

The following table presents loans modified as TDR’s during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012				June 30, 2012
	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
	Modifications		Investment		Modifications		Investment
One-to-four family residential		-	$	-		1	$	44,267
Commercial real estate		-		-		-		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-
Home equity		-		-		1		6,041
Commercial loans		2		269,909		2		269,909
Agricultural loans		-		-		-		-
Consumer loans		2		18,818		2		18,818
Total		4	$	288,727		6	$	339,035

During the six month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company modified one one-to-four family residential real estate loan, with a recorded investment of $44,267, which was deemed to be a TDR.  The modification was made to change the payment schedule to interest-only for a period of time.  The modification did not result in a reduction of the contractual interest rate or a write-off of the principal balance.

26

The Company also modified one home equity loan with a recorded investment of $6,041.  The modification was made to change the payment schedule to interest-only for a period of time.  The modification did not result in a reduction of the contractual interest rate or a write-off of the principal balance.

The Company also modified two commercial loans with a total recorded investment of $269,909.  Both modifications were made to reduce the contractual interest rate and payment amount.  Neither modification resulted in a write-off of the principal balance.

The Company also modified two consumer loans with a total recorded investment of $18,818.  Both modifications were made to extend the term of the loans to lower the payment amount.  Neither modification resulted in a reduction of the contractual interest rate or a write-off of the principal balance.

Management considers the level of defaults within the various portfolios when evaluating qualitative adjustments used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  During the six month period ended June 30, 2012, one commercial real estate loan of $28,000, and one home equity loan of $9,819 that were considered TDR’s defaulted as they were more than 90 days past due at June 30, 2012.  Default occurs when a loan is 90 days or more past due, transferred to nonaccrual or charged-off, and is within twelve months of restructuring.

The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  This table excludes performing troubled debt restructurings.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	636,919	$	1,297,953
Commercial real estate		632,877		361,524
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		668,595		423,113
Commercial loans		75,147		66,852
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		106,729		251,025
Total	$	2,120,267	$	2,400,467

27

6. INVESTMENTS

The amortized cost and approximate fair value of securities, all of which are classified as available-for-sale, are as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2012:
U.S. government and agencies	$	9,545,987	$	235,594	$	(468	)	$	9,781,113
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		47,519,605		1,398,291		-			48,917,896
Municipal bonds		48,621,844		3,392,390		(79,663	)		51,934,571
	$	105,687,436	$	5,026,275	$	(80,131	)	$	110,633,580
December 31, 2011:
U.S. government and agencies	$	14,132,240	$	211,540	$	(8,137	)	$	14,335,643
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		39,479,133		905,509		(20,556	)		40,364,086
Municipal bonds		44,961,448		2,995,639		(34,768	)		47,922,319
	$	98,572,821	$	4,112,688	$	(63,461	)	$	102,622,048

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Within one year	$	100,877	$	101,206
One to five years		6,922,630		7,231,133
Five to ten years		29,295,940		31,023,047
After ten years		21,848,384		23,360,298
		58,167,831		61,715,684
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		47,519,605		48,917,896
	$	105,687,436	$	110,633,580

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $24,254,000 at June 30, 2012 and $25,424,000 at December 31, 2011.

The book value of securities sold under agreement to repurchase amounted to $6,110,000 at June 30, 2012 and $6,785,000 at December 31, 2011.

Gross gains of $527,000 and $109,000 and gross losses of $0 resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were realized during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost.  Total fair value of these investments at June 30, 2012 was $5,318,000, which is approximately 5% of the Company’s available-for-sale investment portfolio.

28

Management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.  Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	Less Than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or More					Total
	Gross					Gross					Gross
	Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair
	Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value
June 30, 2012:
Municipal bonds	$	(79,663	)	$	4,818,867	$	-		$	-	$	(79,663	)	$	4,818,867
U.S. government and agencies		(468	)		499,533		-			-		(468	)		499,533
Total	$	(80,131	)	$	5,318,400	$	-		$	-	$	(80,131	)	$	5,318,400
December 31, 2011:
Municipal bonds	$	(34,768	)	$	2,234,403	$	-		$	-	$	(34,768	)	$	2,234,403
U.S. government and agencies		(8,137	)		1,491,864		-			-		(8,137	)		1,491,864
Subtotal		(42,905	)		3,726,267		-			-		(42,905	)		3,726,267
Mortgage-backed securities
(government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		(18,488	)		4,910,314		(2,068	)		623,455		(20,556	)		5,533,769
Total	$	(61,393	)	$	8,636,581	$	(2,068	)	$	623,455	$	(63,461	)	$	9,260,036

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in municipal bonds, U.S. government and agencies, and mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases.  The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments.  Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

29

7. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Other comprehensive income components and related taxes were as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	1,267,807	$	2,107,173	$	1,423,825	$	2,606,636
Less reclassification adjustment for realized gains
included in income		301,580		55,713		526,908		109,218
Other comprehensive income before tax effect		966,227		2,051,460		896,917		2,497,418
Less tax expense		328,517		697,496		304,952		849,122
Other comprehensive income	$	637,710	$	1,353,964	$	591,965	$	1,648,296

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, included in stockholders’ equity, are as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	4,946,144		$	4,049,227
Tax effect		(1,681,689	)		(1,376,737	)
Net-of-tax amount	$	3,264,455		$	2,672,490

8. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  There is a hierarchy of three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities

Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

Recurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets  recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

30

			June 30,2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. Government and
agencies	$	9,781,113	$	-	$	9,781,113	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities
(Government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		48,917,896		-		48,917,896		-
Municipal bonds		51,934,571		-		51,934,571		-

			December 31, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. Government and
agencies	$	14,335,643	$	-	$	14,335,643	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities
(Government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		40,364,086		-		40,364,086		-
Municipal bonds		47,922,319		-		47,922,319		-

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the period ended June 30, 2012.

Available-for-Sale Securities - Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.  The Company has no Level 1 securities.  If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows.  For those investments, the inputs used by the pricing service to determine fair value may include one, or a combination of, observable inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data market research publications are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.  Level 2 securities include U.S. Government and agencies, mortgage-backed securities (Government-sponsored enterprises – residential) and municipal bonds.  In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.  The Company did not have securities considered Level 3 as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

31

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets  for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans
(collateral dependent)	$	574,672	$	-	$	-	$	574,672
Real estate owned		291,983		-		-		291,983

			December 31, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans
(collateral dependent)	$	867,318	$	-	$	-	$	867,318
Mortgage servicing rights		697,733						697,733
Real estate owned		435,480		-		-		435,480

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent) - The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

32

The Company considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value.  Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral.  Fair value adjustments on impaired loans were $(7,265) at June 30, 2012 and $(393,319) at December 31, 2011.

Mortgage Servicing Rights – Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices.  Accordingly, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models having significant inputs of discount rate, prepayment speed and default rate.  Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Mortgage servicing rights are tested for impairment on at least an annual basis.  The Company uses a third-party to measure mortgage servicing rights through the completion of a proprietary model.  Inputs to the model are reviewed by the Company.  Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights were $(58,818) at December 31, 2011.

Real Estate Owned – Real estate owned (REO) is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell when the real estate is acquired.  Estimated fair value of REO is based on appraisals or evaluations.  REO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Appraisals of REO are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  Fair value adjustments on real estate owned were $(143,497) at June 30, 2012 and $32,352 at December 31, 2011.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements (dollars in thousands).

	Fair Value at 6/30/12		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Real estate owned	$	291,983	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments (%)	Not available
Collateral-dependent impaired loans		574,672	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount	20% – 30% (25%)

33

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices		Significant
			in Active		Other		Significant
			Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,298,031	$	9,298,031	$	-	$	-
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,972,000		-		2,972,000		-
Other investments		106,038		-		106,038		-
Loans held for sale		674,052		-		674,052		-
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		172,029,486		-		-		170,878,318
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800		-		1,113,800		-
Interest receivable		2,083,481		-		2,083,481		-
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		261,552,747		-		127,993,795		136,711,695
Short-term borrowings		6,109,700		-		6,109,700		-
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		952,129		-		952,129		-
Interest payable		323,926		-		323,926		-
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans		-		-		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-		-		-
Lines of credit		-		-		-		-

34

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,387,947	$	11,387,947
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,476,000		2,476,000
Other investments		116,088		116,088
Loans held for sale		446,818		446,818
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		170,865,102		169,667,091
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800		1,113,800
Interest receivable		2,071,534		2,071,534
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		254,240,060		265,515,126
Short-term borrowings		6,517,750		6,517,750
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		740,083		740,083
Interest payable		349,121		349,121
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-
Lines of credit		-		-

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Interest-Earning Time Deposits in Banks, Interest Receivable, Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, and Other Investments - The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Loans Held for Sale - For homogeneous categories of loans, such as mortgage loans held for sale, fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics.

Loans - The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.  Loans with similar characteristics were aggregated for purposes of the calculations.  The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

Deposits - Deposits include demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and certain money market deposits.  The carrying amount approximates fair value.  The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-term Borrowings, Interest Payable, and Advances from Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance - The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Commitments to Originate Loans, Letters of Credit, and Lines of Credit - The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.  For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.  The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

35

9. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK

The Company owns $1,113,800 of Federal Home Loan Bank stock as of June 30, 2012.  The Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLB) has been operating under a Cease and Desist Order from their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).  The FHFA terminated the Cease and Desist Order during April 2012.  The FHLB’s new capital structure and excess stock repurchase plan has been approved by the FHFA.  The repurchase plan allows for the FHLB to repurchase approximately $500 million in excess capital stock held by members which will represent 45% of the excess stock outstanding.  The FHLB will continue to provide liquidity and funding through advances and purchasing loans through the MPF program.  In 2012 and 2011, the FHLB declared and paid quarterly dividends.  Management performed an analysis and deemed the cost method investment in FHLB stock was ultimately recoverable.

10. MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

Activity in the balance of mortgage servicing rights, measured using the amortization method, for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Balance, beginning of year	$	697,733		$	797,327
Servicing rights capitalized		96,131			137,206
Amortization of servicing rights		(150,425	)		(226,998	)
Change in valuation allowance		24,808			(9,802	)
Balance, end of period	$	668,247		$	697,733

Activity in the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Balance, beginning of year	$	173,791		$	163,989
Additions		-			58,818
Reductions		(24,808	)		(49,016	)
Balance, end of period	$	148,983		$	173,791

36

11. INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is shown below.

	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
Computed at the statutory rate (34%)	$	825,321		$	772,274
Increase (decrease) resulting from Tax exempt interest		(268,978	)		(249,046	)
State income taxes, net		141,573			135,251
Increase in cash surrender value		(32,054	)		(27,063	)
Other, net		(261	)		406
Actual tax expense	$	665,601		$	631,822

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers in the way of commitments to extend credit.  Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.  Substantially all of the Company’s loans are to borrowers located in Cass, Morgan, Macoupin, Montgomery, and surrounding counties in Illinois.

37

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

 ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of the Company.  The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto.

Forward Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements” which may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.”  Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates and most other statements that are not historical in nature.  These factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of disruptions in the financial markets, changes in interest rates, general economic conditions and the current weak state of the United States economy, deposit flows, demand for mortgage and other loans, real estate values, and competition; changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines; changes in legislation or regulation, including the Dodd-Frank Act and the elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing of products and services.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Significant Estimates

In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in preparing our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.  Management believes the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies and significant estimates, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgements, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Allowance for Loan Losses - The Company believes the allowance for loan losses is the critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.  The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near term and is established through a provision for loan losses.  The allowance is based upon past loan experience and other factors which, in management’s judgement, deserve current recognition in estimating loan losses.  The evaluation includes a review of all loans on which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured.  Other factors considered by management include the size and character of the loan portfolio, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions and historical losses on each portfolio category.  In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties, which collateralize loans.  Management uses the available information to make such determinations.  If circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be affected.  While we believe we have established our existing allowance for loan losses in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Company’s loan portfolio, will not request an increase in the allowance for loan losses.  Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that increases to the allowance will not be necessary if loan quality deteriorates.

38

Foreclosed Assets – Foreclosed assets primarily consist of real estate owned.  Real estate owned acquired through loan foreclosures are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis.  The adjustment at the time of foreclosure is recorded through the allowance for loan losses.  Due to the subjective nature of establishing fair value when the asset is acquired, the actual fair value of the other real estate owned could differ from the original estimate.  If it is determined that fair value of an asset declines subsequent to foreclosure, the asset is written down through a charge to non-interest expense.  Operating costs associated with the assets after acquisition are also recorded as non-interest expense.  Gains and losses on the disposition of other real estate owned are netted and posted to non-interest expense.

Deferred Income Tax Assets/Liabilities – Our net deferred income tax asset arises from differences in the dates that items of income and expense enter into our reported income and taxable income.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for these items as they arise.  From an accounting standpoint, deferred tax assets are reviewed to determine that they are realizable based upon the historical level of our taxable income, estimates of our future taxable income and the reversals of deferred tax liabilities.  In most cases, the realization of the deferred tax asset is based on our future profitability.  If we were to experience net operating losses for tax purposes in a future period, the realization of our deferred tax assets would be evaluated for a potential valuation reserve.

Impairment of Goodwill - Goodwill, an intangible asset with an indefinite life, was recorded on our balance sheet in prior periods as a result of acquisition activity.  Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually, unless there are factors present that indicate a potential impairment, in which case, the goodwill impairment test is performed more frequently.

Mortgage Servicing Rights - Mortgage servicing rights are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly reduced by prepayments.  Prepayments usually increase when mortgage interest rates decline and decrease when mortgage interest rates rise.

Fair Value Measurements – The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.  The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using a variety of valuation methods.  Where financial instruments are actively traded and have quoted market prices, quoted market prices are used for fair value.  When the financial instruments are not actively traded, other observable market inputs, such as quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, may be used, if available, to determine fair value.  When observable market prices do not exist, the Company estimates fair value.  Other factors such as model assumptions and market dislocations can affect estimates of fair value.

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all our accounting policies.  In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with no need for management’s judgement in their application.  There are also areas in which management’s judgement in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Recent Developments

Midwest Drought - Current drought conditions are expected to reduce 2012 crop yields. As further discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements included herein, the Company originates agricultural operating lines of credit, which generally have terms of one year and are secured by growing crops, livestock and equipment, and mortgages on farmland.  The repayment of agricultural business loans generally is dependent on the successful operation of a farm and can be adversely affected by fluctuations in crop prices, increase in interest rates, and changes in weather conditions.  These developments may result in smaller harvests and less income for farmers which may adversely affect such borrower’s ability to repay a loan, and potentially result in an increase in the level of problem loans and loan losses in our agricultural portfolio.  While not required, the majority of our agricultural business loans are covered by crop insurance, which provides protection against loss due to lower crop yields as a result of drought conditions.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact these conditions may have on its agricultural customers and to the local economy.

39

Financial Condition

June 30, 2012 Compared to December 31, 2011

Total assets increased by $9.6 million, or 3.1%, to $316.9 million at June 30, 2012 from $307.3 million at December 31, 2011.  Net loans increased $1.2 million, or 0.7%, to $172.0 million at June 30, 2012 from $170.8 million at December 31, 2011.  The increase is primarily due to growth in our agricultural real estate portfolio during 2012.  The loan portfolio continues to be affected by low loan demand as a result of the current weakened economy.  Available-for-sale mortgage-backed securities increased $8.6 million, or 21.2%, to $48.9 million at June 30, 2012 from $40.3 million at December 31, 2011.  The growth in loans and mortgage-backed securities was primarily due to the investment of funds from cash and cash equivalents and deposit growth.  Cash and cash equivalents decreased $2.1 million to $9.3 million at June 30, 2012.

Total deposits increased $7.3 million, or 2.9%, to $261.6 million at June 30, 2012, primarily due to a $5.3 million increase in transaction accounts.  Transaction accounts have continued to grow as customers have preferred to maintain short-term, liquid deposits in the current low-rate environment.  Deposit growth reflects customer preference for insured deposits versus alternative investments.  Other borrowings, which consisted of overnight repurchase agreements, decreased $408,000 during this same time frame.

Stockholders’ equity increased $2.1 million, or 5.2%, to $43.3 million at June 30, 2012.  The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily the result of $1.8 million in net income and $592,000 in other comprehensive income, which was partially offset by the payment of $283,000 in cash dividends.  Other comprehensive income consisted of the increase in net unrealized gains, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities reflecting changes in market prices for securities in our portfolio. Other comprehensive income does not include changes in the fair value of other financial instruments included on the balance sheet.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

General:  Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $847,000, or $0.45 per common share, basic and diluted, compared to net income of $905,000, or $0.48 per common share, basic and diluted, for the three months ended June 30, 2011.  The $58,000 decrease in net income was due to a decrease of $203,000 in net interest income and increases of $20,000 in the provision for loan losses and $116,000 in non-interest expense, partially offset by an increase of $211,000 in non-interest income and a decrease of $70,000 in income taxes.

Interest Income:  Total interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $367,000, or 10.2%, to $3.2 million from $3.6 million for the same period of 2011.  The decrease in interest income reflected decreases of $250,000 in interest income on loans, $15,000 in interest income on investment securities, and $114,000 in interest income on mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by an increase of $12,000 in interest income on other interest-earning assets.  As noted below, the changes in the composition of our interest-earning assets reflects the investment in investment and mortgage-backed securities during a time when satisfactory loan origination opportunities were lacking.

Interest income on loans decreased $250,000 to $2.5 million for the second quarter of 2012 primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of loans.  The average balance of the loan portfolio decreased $4.8 million to $172.7 million for the second quarter of 2012.  The decrease in the average balance of the loan portfolio reflected a decrease in the average balance of residential real estate and home equity loans, reflecting the volume of loans refinanced and subsequently sold into the secondary market.  The average yield on loans also decreased to 5.70% during the second quarter of 2012 from 6.11% during the second quarter of 2011.

40

Interest income on investment securities decreased $15,000 to $502,000 for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. The decrease reflected a decrease in the average yield of investment securities to 3.43% during the second quarter of 2012 from 3.59% during the second quarter of 2011.  The average yield does not reflect the benefit of the higher tax-equivalent yield of our municipal bonds, which is reflected in income tax expense.  The decrease in the average yield was partially offset by an increase of $1.0 million in the average balance of the investment securities portfolio to $58.6 million during the second quarter of 2012, compared to $57.6 million for the second quarter of 2011.

Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased $114,000 to $253,000 for the second quarter of 2012, compared to $367,000 for the second quarter of 2011.  The decrease reflected a 101 basis point decrease in the average yield of mortgage-backed securities to 2.19% for the second quarter of 2012, compared to 3.20% for the second quarter of 2011.  The average yield was impacted by higher premium amortization resulting from faster prepayments on mortgage-backed securities.  The amortization of premiums on mortgage-backed securities, which reduces the average yield, increased to $164,000 during the second quarter of 2012, compared to $66,000 during the second quarter of 2011.  The decrease in interest income on mortgage-backed securities also reflected a $363,000 increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities to $46.2 million during the second quarter of 2012.

Interest income on other interest-earning assets, which consisted of interest-earning demand and time deposit accounts and federal funds sold, increased $12,000 during the second quarter of 2012.  The average balance of these accounts increased $6.3 million to $12.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.  The average yield on other interest-earning assets increased to 0.39% during the second quarter of 2012 from 0.04% during the second quarter of 2011, primarily due to the investment in higher-yielding time deposit accounts during the fourth quarter of 2011.

Interest Expense:  Total interest expense decreased $164,000, or 21.9%, to $588,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $752,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.  The lower interest expense was due to a $163,000 decrease in the cost of deposits and a $1,000 decrease in the cost of borrowed funds.

Interest expense on deposits decreased $163,000 to $584,000 for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $747,000 for the second quarter of 2011.  The decrease in interest expense on deposits was primarily due to a 28 basis point decrease in the average rate paid on deposits to 0.98% during the second quarter of 2012 from 1.26% during the second quarter of 2011.  The decrease reflected ongoing low short-term market interest rates during 2012.  The average balance of deposits was $237.5 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $237.4 million for the second quarter of 2011.

Interest paid on borrowed funds decreased $1,000 to $4,000 for the second quarter of 2012 due to a decrease in the average cost of borrowings.  The average rate paid on borrowed funds decreased to 0.29% during the second quarter of 2012 compared to 0.43% during the second quarter of 2011.  The average balance of borrowed funds was $5.4 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $4.9 million for the second quarter of 2011.

Net Interest Income.  As a result of the changes in interest income and interest expense noted above, net interest income decreased by $203,000, or 7.1%, to $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.  Our interest rate spread decreased by 28 basis points to 3.48% during the second quarter of 2012 from 3.76% during the second quarter of 2011.  Our net interest margin decreased 32 basis points to 3.64% for the second quarter of 2012 from 3.96% for the second quarter of 2011.

Provision for Loan Losses: The provision for loan losses is determined by management as the amount needed to replenish the allowance for loan losses, after net charge-offs have been deducted, to a level considered adequate to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

41

The provision for loan losses totaled $170,000 during the second quarter of 2012, compared to $150,000 during the second quarter of 2011.  The increase in the provision for loan losses reflected a higher level of net charge-offs during the second quarter of 2012.  Net charge-offs equaled $370,000 during the second quarter of 2012 compared to a net recovery of $132,000 during the second quarter of 2011.

The allowance for loan losses decreased $30,000 to $3.1 million at June 30, 2012 from $3.2 million at June 30, 2011.  Loans delinquent 30 days or more decreased $885,000 to $1.8 million, or 1.02% of total loans, as of June 30, 2012, from $2.7 million, or 1.53% of total loans, as of December 31, 2011.  Loans delinquent 30 days or more totaled $1.9 million, or 1.07% of total loans at June 30, 2011.

Provisions for loan losses have been made to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed adequate following management’s evaluation of the repayment capacity and collateral protection afforded by each problem credit.  This review also considered the local economy and the level of bankruptcies and foreclosures in our market area.  During the recent quarter, management has also considered the expected impact the severe drought in our area will have on our agricultural borrowers and the potential adverse effect it will have in our market area economy.  The following table sets forth information regarding nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Non-accruing loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	636,919		$	1,297,953
Commercial real estate		632,877			361,524
Commercial business		75,147			66,852
Home equity		668,595			423,113
Consumer		106,729			251,025
Total	$	2,120,267		$	2,400,467
Accruing loans delinquent more than 90 days:
Total	$	-		$	-
Real estate owned:
One-to-four family residential	$	124,790		$	18,800
Commercial real estate		167,193			416,680
Total	$	291,983		$	435,480
Total nonperforming assets	$	2,412,250		$	2,835,947
Total as a percentage of total assets		0.76	%		0.92	%

Nonperforming assets decreased $424,000 to $2.4 million, or 0.76% of total assets, as of June 30, 2012, compared to $2.8 million, or 0.92% of total assets, as of December 31, 2011.  The decrease in nonperforming assets was due to a $280,000 decrease in nonperforming loans and a $144,000 decrease in real estate owned.  Nonperforming loans decreased to $2.1 million as of June 30, 2012, from $2.4 million at December 31, 2011.  The decrease in nonperforming loans primarily reflected the payoff of two residential real estate secured loans totaling $589,000 during 2012, partially offset by increases in nonperforming commercial real estate and home equity loans.

The following table shows the aggregate principal amount of potential problem credits on the Company’s watch list at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  All non-accruing loans are automatically placed on the watch list.  The decrease in Substandard credits reflected the payoffs totaling $589,000 noted above and charge-offs of $298,000.  The decrease in Special Mention credits primarily reflected the improvement and upgrade of one borrower totaling $754,000.

42

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Special Mention credits	$	2,171,459	$	3,310,565
Substandard credits		5,632,005		6,598,944
Total watch list credits	$	7,803,464	$	9,909,509

Non-Interest Income:  Non-interest income increased $211,000, or 21.7%, to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $1.0 million for the same period in 2011.  The increase in non-interest income resulted primarily from increases of $246,000 in gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities and $38,000 in income from mortgage banking operations, partially offset by a decrease of $81,000 in commission income.  The increase in gains on the sale of securities reflected changing market conditions, as a lower volume of securities totaling $4.7 million were sold during the second quarter of 2012 compared to $10.6 million during the same period of 2011.  Bonds sold during the second quarter of 2012 primarily consisted of longer-term, taxable municipal bonds which were sold in order to reduce the volatility of the investment portfolio in a rising rate environment.  The increase in mortgage banking income was due to a higher volume of loan sales, as we sold $9.8 million of loans to the secondary market during the second quarter of 2012, compared to $4.8 million during the same period of 2011.  The decrease in commission income reflected changing market conditions and reduced account rollover activity during 2012.

Non-Interest Expense:  Total non-interest expense increased $116,000 to $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $2.4 million for the same period of 2011.  The increase in non-interest expense consisted mainly of increases of $48,000 in compensation and benefits expense, $36,000 in professional fees, and $54,000 in other expense, partially offset by a decrease of $15,000 in FDIC insurance premiums.  The increase in compensation and benefits expense resulted primarily from higher expenses related to the effect of lower discount rates and the funding of benefit plans, as well as normal salary and benefit cost increases.  The increase in other expense is primarily due to higher expenses related to real estate owned, advertising, and regulatory fees.  FDIC insurance premiums have benefitted from reduced premium rates.

Income Taxes:  The provision for income taxes decreased $70,000 to $299,000 during the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011.  The decrease in the income tax provision reflected a decrease in taxable income.  The effective tax rate was 26.07% and 28.93% during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

General:  Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1,762,000, or $0.93 per common share, basic and diluted, compared to net income of $1,640,000, or $0.87 per common share, basic and diluted, for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  The $122,000 increase in net income was due to a decrease of $75,000 in the provision for loan losses and an increase of $331,000 in non-interest income, partially offset by a decrease of $146,000 in net interest income and increases of $104,000 in non-interest expense and $34,000 in income taxes.

Interest Income:  Total interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $508,000, or 7.2%, to $6.5 million from $7.0 million for the same period of 2011.  The decrease in interest income reflected a $365,000 decrease in interest income on loans, a $24,000 increase in interest income on investment securities, an $188,000 decrease in interest income on mortgage-backed securities, and a $21,000 increase in interest income on other interest-earning assets.  As noted below, the changes in the composition of our interest-earning assets reflects the investment in investment and mortgage-backed securities during a time when satisfactory loan origination opportunities were lacking.

43

Interest income on loans decreased $365,000 to $5.0 million for the first half of 2012 due to decreases in the average balance and yield of loans.  The average balance of the loan portfolio decreased $7.0 million to $171.3 million for the first six months of 2012 compared to $178.3 million for the first six months of 2011.  The decrease in the average balance of the loan portfolio was primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of residential real estate and home equity loans, reflecting the volume of loans refinanced and subsequently sold into the secondary market.  The average yield on loans decreased to 5.84% during the first six months of 2012 from 6.02% during the first six months of 2011.  The decrease primarily reflected the low interest rate environment.

Interest income on investment securities increased $24,000 to $1.0 million for the first half of 2012 from the same period of 2010.  The increase reflected a $1.9 million increase in the average balance of the investment securities portfolio to $58.8 million during the first six months of 2012, compared to $56.9 million for the first six months of 2011.  The increase in the average balance of investment securities was primarily due to the investment of funds from deposit growth and the lack of corresponding loan demand.  The average yield of investment securities decreased to 3.48% during the first six months of 2012 from 3.53% for the first six months of 2011 due to purchases of newer securities at lower interest rates.  The average yield does not reflect the benefit of the higher tax-equivalent yield of our municipal bonds, which is reflected in income tax expense.

Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased $188,000 to $458,000 for the first half of 2012, compared to $646,000 for the first half of 2011.  The decrease reflected an 85 basis point decrease in the average yield of mortgage-backed securities to 2.08% for the first half of 2012, compared to 2.93% for the first half of 2011.  The average yield was impacted by higher premium amortization resulting from faster prepayments on mortgage-backed securities.  The amortization of premiums on mortgage-backed securities, which reduces the average yield, increased to $330,000 during the first six months of 2012, compared to $197,000 during the first six months of 2011.  The decrease in interest income on mortgage-backed securities also reflected a $220,000 decrease in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities to $44.0 million during the first half of 2012.

Interest income on other interest-earning assets, which consisted of interest-earning demand and time deposit accounts and federal funds sold, increased $21,000 to $24,000 during the first half of 2012 primarily due to a an increase in the average balance.  The average balance of these accounts increased $7.8 million to $14.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  The average yield on other interest-earning assets increased to 0.33% during the first half of 2012 from 0.07% during the first half of 2011, primarily due to the investment in higher-yielding time deposit accounts during the fourth quarter of 2011.

Interest Expense:  Total interest expense decreased $362,000, or 23.2%, to $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  The lower interest expense was due to a $359,000 decrease in the cost of deposits and a $3,000 decrease in the cost of borrowed funds.

Interest expense on deposits decreased $359,000 to $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  The decrease in interest expense on deposits was primarily due to a 30 basis point decrease in the average rate paid to 1.00% during the first half of 2012 from 1.30% during the first half of 2011.  The decrease reflected low short-term market interest rates which continued during 2012.  The average balance of deposits was $236.6 million for the first half of 2012 compared to $237.5 million for the first half of 2011.

Interest paid on borrowed funds decreased $3,000 to $7,000 for the first half of 2012 due to a decrease in the average cost of borrowings.  The average rate paid on borrowed funds decreased to 0.27% during the first six months of 2012 compared to 0.47% during the first six months of 2011.  The decrease in the average cost was partially offset by an increase of $783,000 in the average balance of borrowed funds to $4.9 million during the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011.

Net Interest Income.  As a result of the changes in interest income and interest expense noted above, net interest income decreased by $146,000, or 2.7%, to $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  Our interest rate spread decreased by 9 basis points to 3.53% during the first half of 2012 from 3.62% during the first half of 2011.  Our net interest margin decreased 13 basis points to 3.69% for the first half of 2012 from 3.82% for the first half of 2011.

44

Provision for Loan Losses: The provision for loan losses is determined by management as the amount needed to replenish the allowance for loan losses, after net charge-offs have been deducted, to a level considered adequate to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The following table shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,296,607	$	2,964,285
Charge-offs:
One-to-four family residential		70,295		32,211
Commercial real estate		257,043		260,785
Home equity		66,744		4,162
Consumer		53,385		1,097
Total		447,467		298,255
Recoveries:
One-to-four family residential		22,243		-
Commercial real estate		-		8,842
Commercial business		316		153,809
Home equity		6,505		5,142
Consumer		2,299		2,003
Total		31,363		169,796
Net loan charge-offs		416,104		128,459
Additions charged to operations		250,000		325,000
Balance at end of period	$	3,130,503	$	3,160,826

The allowance for loan losses decreased $30,000 at June 30, 2012, from $3.2 million at June 30, 2011.  The decrease was the result of the net charge-offs exceeding the provision for loan losses.  The provision decreased $75,000 to $250,000 during the first six months of 2012, compared to $325,000 during the first six months of 2011.  Net charge-offs increased $288,000 to $416,000 during the first half of 2012, compared to $128,000 during the first half of 2011.  The decrease in the provision and the allowance for loan losses during 2012 reflected the lower level of nonperforming loans and watch list credits.

Non-Interest Income:  Non-interest income increased $331,000, or 16.9%, to $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  The increase in non-interest income resulted primarily from increases of $418,000 in gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities and $147,000 in net income from mortgage banking operations, partially offset by a decrease of $248,000 in commission income.  The increase in gains on the sale of securities reflected changing market conditions, as a lower volume of securities totaling $14.8 million were sold during the first half of 2012 compared to $16.9 million during the same period of 2011.  Securities sales during 2012 were primarily made to eliminate factored-down mortgage-backed securities, which were subject to increased prepayment risk due to new government-assisted homeowner refinancing programs, and longer-term, taxable municipal bonds, which had higher volatility in a rising rate environment.  The increase in mortgage banking operations income was due to a higher volume of loan sales in 2012, as we sold $22.9 million of loans to the secondary market during the first half of 2012, compared to $7.6 million during the same period of 2011.  The higher volume of sales reflected a higher volume of mortgage originations, which are affected by changes in market interest rates.  The decrease in commission income reflected changing market conditions and reduced account rollover activity during 2012.

45

Non-Interest Expense:  Total non-interest expense increased $103,000, or 2.1%, to $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $4.8 million for the same period of 2011.  The increase in non-interest expense consisted primarily of increases of $92,000 in compensation and benefits expense and $73,000 in other expense, partially offset by a decrease of $73,000 in FDIC insurance premiums.  The increase in compensation and benefits expense resulted primarily from higher expenses related to the effect of lower discount rates and the funding of benefit plans, as well as normal salary and benefit cost increases.  The increase in other expense is primarily due to higher expenses related to real estate owned, advertising, and regulatory fees.  FDIC insurance premiums have benefitted from reduced premium rates.

Income Taxes:  The provision for income taxes increased $34,000 to $666,000 during the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011.  The increase in the income tax provision reflected an increase in taxable income, partially offset by an increase in the benefit of tax-exempt income.  The effective tax rate was 27.42% and 27.82% during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents.  The levels of these assets are dependent on the Company’s operating, financing, and investing activities.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents totaled $9.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively.  The Company’s primary sources of funds include principal and interest repayments on loans (both scheduled payments and prepayments), maturities of investment securities and principal repayments from mortgage-backed securities (both scheduled payments and prepayments).  During the past six months, the most significant sources of funds have been deposit growth, calls and sales of investment securities, and principal repayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities.  These funds have been used primarily for purchases of U.S. Agency, municipal and mortgage-backed securities, loan originations, and the purchase of bank-owned life insurance.

While scheduled loan repayments and proceeds from maturing investment securities and principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities are relatively predictable, deposit flows and prepayments are more influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions, and competition.  The Company attempts to price its deposits to meet asset-liability objectives and stay competitive with local market conditions.

Liquidity management is both a short- and long-term responsibility of management.  The Company adjusts its investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (i) expected loan demand, (ii) projected purchases of investment and mortgage-backed securities, (iii) expected deposit flows, (iv) yields available on interest-bearing deposits, and (v) liquidity of its asset/liability management program.  Excess liquidity is generally invested in interest-earning overnight deposits and other short-term U.S. agency obligations.  If the Company requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, it has the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB.  The Company may borrow from the FHLB under a blanket agreement which assigns all investments in FHLB stock as well as qualifying first mortgage loans equal to 150% of the outstanding balance as collateral to secure the amounts borrowed.  This borrowing arrangement is limited to a maximum of 30% of the Company’s total assets or twenty times the balance of FHLB stock held by the Company.  At June 30, 2012 the Company had no outstanding FHLB advances and approximately $22.3 million available to it under the above-mentioned borrowing arrangement.

The Company maintains minimum levels of liquid assets as established by the Board of Directors.  The Company’s liquidity ratios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were 41.8% and 40.4%, respectively.  This ratio represents the volume of short-term liquid assets as a percentage of net deposits and borrowings due within one year.

46

The Company must also maintain adequate levels of liquidity to ensure the availability of funds to satisfy loan commitments.  The Company anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current commitments principally through the use of current liquid assets and through its borrowing capacity discussed above.  The following table summarizes these commitments at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Commitments to fund loans	$	41,932,776	$	40,878,143
Standby letters of credit		357,744		400,914

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined).  Management believes that at June 30, 2012, the Company met all its capital adequacy requirements.

Under Illinois law, Illinois-chartered savings banks are required to maintain a minimum core capital to total assets ratio of 3%.  The Illinois Commissioner of Savings and Residential Finance (the “Commissioner”) is authorized to require a savings bank to maintain a higher minimum capital level if the Commissioner determines that the savings bank’s financial condition or history, management or earnings prospects are not adequate.  If a savings bank’s core capital ratio falls below the required level, the Commissioner may direct the savings bank to adhere to a specific written plan established by the Commissioner to correct the savings bank’s capital deficiency, as well as a number of other restrictions on the savings bank’s operations, including a prohibition on the declaration of dividends by the savings bank’s board of directors.  At June 30, 2012, the Bank’s core capital ratio was 10.35% of total average assets, which substantially exceeded the required amount.

The Bank is also required to maintain regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.  The Bank must have:  (i) Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets of 4.0%, (ii) Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets of 4.0%, and (iii) Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets of 8.0%.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, minimum requirements and the Bank's actual ratios are as follows:

	June 30, 2012 Actual			December 31, 2011 Actual			Minimum Required
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets		10.35	%		10.35	%		4.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		15.42	%		15.42	%		4.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		16.67	%		16.67	%		8.00	%

47

Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with GAAP which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.  The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company’s operations.  Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature.  As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation.  Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

48

The following table sets forth the average balances and interest rates (costs) on the Company’s assets and liabilities during the periods presented.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Interest Rates (Dollars in thousands)
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012							2011
	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost
Interest-earnings assets:
Loans	$	172,705	$	2,461		5.70	%	$	177,544	$	2,711		6.11	%
Investment securities		58,578		502		3.43	%		57,588		516		3.59	%
Mortgage-backed securities		46,188		253		2.19	%		45,825		367		3.20	%
Other		12,678		12		0.39	%		6,371		1		0.04	%
Total interest-earning assets		290,149		3,228		4.45	%		287,328		3,595		5.01	%
Non-interest earnings assets		22,297							19,911
Total assets	$	312,446						$	307,239
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	237,455	$	584		0.98	%	$	237,385	$	747		1.26	%
Other borrowings		5,419		4		0.29	%		4,880		5		0.43	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		242,874		588		0.97	%		242,265		752		1.24	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities		26,959							27,614
Stockholders’ equity		42,613							37,360
Total liabilities/stockholders’ equity	$	312,446						$	307,239
Net interest income			$	2,640						$	2,843
Interest rate spread (average yield earned minus average rate paid)						3.48	%						3.76	%
Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets)						3.64	%						3.96	%

49

The following table sets forth the changes in rate and changes in volume of the Company’s interest earning assets and liabilities for the comparative three month periods.

Analysis of Volume and Rate Changes
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012 Compared to 2011
	Increase(Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Net
Interest-earnings assets:
Loans	$	(178	)	$	(72	)	$	(250	)
Investment securities		(23	)		9			(14	)
Mortgage-backed securities		(117	)		3			(114	)
Other		10			1			11
Total net change in income on       interest-earning assets		(308	)		(59	)		(367	)
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits		(163	)					(163	)
Other borrowings		(2	)		1			(1	)
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities		(165	)		1			(164	)
Net change in net interest income	$	(143	)	$	(60	)	$	(203	)

50

The following table sets forth the average balances and interest rates (costs) on the Company’s assets and liabilities during the periods presented.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Interest Rates
(Dollars in thousands)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012							2011
	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost
Interest-earnings assets:
Loans	$	171,337	$	5,002		5.84	%	$	178,347	$	5,367		6.02	%
Investment securities		58,772		1,026		3.48	%		56,834		1,002		3.53	%
Mortgage-backed securities		43,952		458		2.08	%		44,172		647		2.93	%
Other		14,199		24		0.33	%		6,397		2		0.07	%
Total interest-earning assets		288,260		6,510		4.52	%		285,750		7,018		4.91	%
Non-interest earnings assets		22,030							20,141
Total assets	$	310,290						$	305,891
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	236,573	$	1,188		1.00	%	$	237,535	$	1,547		1.30	%
Other borrowings		4,943		7		0.27	%		4,160		10		0.47	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		241,516		1,195		0.99	%		241,695		1,557		1.29	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities		26,450							27,435
Stockholders’ equity		42,324							36,761
Total liabilities/stockholders’ equity	$	310,290						$	305,891
Net interest income			$	5,315						$	5,461
Interest rate spread (average yield earned minus average rate paid)						3.53	%						3.62	%
Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets)						3.69	%						3.82	%

51

The following table sets forth the changes in rate and changes in volume of the Company’s interest earning assets and liabilities for the comparative six month periods.

Analysis of Volume and Rate Changes
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012 Compared to 2011 Increase(Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Net
Interest-earnings assets:
Loans	$	(158	)	$	(207	)	$	(365	)
Investment securities		(10	)		34			24
Mortgage-backed securities		(185	)		(3	)		(188	)
Other		16			5			21
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets		(337	)		(171	)		(508	)
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits		(352	)		(7	)		(359	)
Other borrowings		(5	)		2			(3	)
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities		(357	)		(5	)		(362	)
Net change in net interest income	$	20		$	(166	)	$	(146	)

52

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

 ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s policy in recent years has been to reduce its interest rate risk by better matching the maturities of its interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, selling its long-term fixed-rate residential mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or more to the secondary market, originating adjustable rate loans, balloon loans with terms ranging from three to five years and originating consumer and commercial business loans, which typically are for a shorter duration and at higher rates of interest than one-to-four family loans.  Our portfolio of mortgage-backed securities, including both fixed and variable rates, also provides monthly cash flow.  The remaining investment portfolio has been structured to better match the maturities and rates of its interest-bearing liabilities.  With respect to liabilities, the Company has attempted to increase its savings and transaction deposit accounts, which management believes are more resistant to changes in interest rates than certificate accounts.  The Board of Directors appoints the Asset-Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which is responsible for reviewing the Company’s asset and liability policies.  The ALCO meets quarterly to review interest rate risk and trends, as well as liquidity and capital ratio requirements.

The Company uses a comprehensive asset/liability software package provided by a third-party vendor to perform interest rate sensitivity analysis for all product categories.  The primary focus of the Company’s analysis is on the effect of interest rate increases and decreases on net interest income.  Management believes that this analysis reflects the potential effects on current earnings of interest rate changes.  Call criteria and prepayment assumptions are taken into consideration for investment securities and loans.  All of the Company’s interest sensitive assets and liabilities are analyzed by product type and repriced based upon current offering rates.  The software performs interest rate sensitivity analysis by performing rate shocks of plus or minus 300 basis points in 100 basis point increments.

The following table shows projected results at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 of the impact on net interest income from an immediate change in interest rates, as well as the benchmarks established by the ALCO.  The results are shown as a dollar and percentage change in net interest income over the twelve months following the June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 dates.

	Change in Net Interest Income
	(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011						ALCO
Rate Shock:	$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			Benchmark
+ 200 basis points		43			0.36	%		(84	)		-0.71	%	> (20.00)	%
+ 100 basis points		95			0.80	%		(21	)		-0.18	%	> (12.50)	%
- 100 basis points		(211	)		-1.78	%		(200	)		-1.70	%	> (12.50)	%
- 200 basis points		(607	)		-5.12	%		(415	)		-3.51	%	> (20.00)	%

The table above indicates that as of June 30, 2012, in the event of a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 0.36% increase in net interest income.  In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 1.78% decrease in net interest income.  Because of the low interest rate environment, we do not believe that a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates is meaningful in showing changes in our net income.

53

The foregoing computations are based upon numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, prepayments, and deposit mix.  The computed estimates should not be relied upon as a projection of actual results.  Despite the limitations on precision inherent in these computations, management believes that the information provided is reasonably indicative of the effect of changes in interest rate levels on the net earning capacity of the Company’s current mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.  Management continues to use the results of these computations, along with the results of its computer model projections, in order to maximize current earnings while positioning the Company to minimize the effect of a prolonged shift in interest rates that would adversely affect future results of operations.

At the present time, the most significant market risk affecting the Company is interest rate risk.  Other market risks such as foreign currency exchange risk and commodity price risk do not occur in the normal business of the Company.  The Company also is not currently using trading activities or derivative instruments to control interest rate risk.

54

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

 ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13(a)-15(e) that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

55

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings
	At June 30, 2012, the Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than non-material legal proceedings undertaken in the normal course of business.
Item 1.A.	Risk Factors
	There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in its annual report on Form 10-K.
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	At June 30, 2012, we had 86,547 shares available under a previously announced share repurchase program, of which no shares were repurchased during the past three months.
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities
	None.
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures
	None.
Item 5.	Other Information
	None.
Item 6.	Exhibits
	31.1 - Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
	31.2 - Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
	32.1 - Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	101 INS - XBRL Instance Document
	101 SCH - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	101 CAL - XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
	101 DEF - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101 LAB - XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
	101 PRE - XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

56

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.
		Registrant
Date:	08/07/2012	/s/ Richard A. Foss
		Richard A. Foss
		President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Diana S. Tone

Diana S. Tone

Chief Financial Officer

57

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard A. Foss, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principle;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the period covered by this report based  on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

08/07/2012	/s/ Richard A. Foss
Date	Richard A. Foss
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Diana S. Tone, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principle;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the period covered by this report based  on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

08/07/12	/s/ Diana S. Tone
Date	Diana S. Tone
	Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Foss, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Diana S. Tone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

08/07/12	/s/Richard A. Foss
Date	Richard A. Foss
	President and Chief Executive Officer

08/07/12	/s/Diana S. Tone
Date	Diana S. Tone
	Chief Financial Officer

XML

Credit Risk Profile of Loan Portfolio Based on Rating Category and Payment Activity (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	$ 175,156,187	$ 174,201,430	$ 177,920,254
Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	16,042,788	17,939,927
Pass
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	167,352,723	164,291,921
Special Mention
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	2,171,459	3,310,565
Substandard
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	5,632,005	6,598,944
Corporate Credit Quality Indicator
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	175,156,187	174,201,430
Mortgage loans on real estate | Pass | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	38,761,356	36,040,795
Mortgage loans on real estate | Pass | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	34,980,711	36,936,906
Mortgage loans on real estate | Pass | Agricultural
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	32,612,241	29,567,057
Mortgage loans on real estate | Pass | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	13,095,024	14,746,631
Mortgage loans on real estate | Special Mention | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	1,221,466	1,642,602
Mortgage loans on real estate | Special Mention | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	582,523	574,484
Mortgage loans on real estate | Special Mention | Agricultural
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross		404,592
Mortgage loans on real estate | Special Mention | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	169,610	278,323
Mortgage loans on real estate | Substandard | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	1,310,379	1,788,611
Mortgage loans on real estate | Substandard | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	2,304,777	2,658,423
Mortgage loans on real estate | Substandard | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	961,919	1,017,834
Mortgage loans on real estate | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	41,293,201	39,472,008
Mortgage loans on real estate | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	37,868,011	40,169,813
Mortgage loans on real estate | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator | Agricultural
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	32,612,241	29,971,649
Mortgage loans on real estate | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	16,042,788
Commercial business | Pass
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	23,019,375	22,253,904
Commercial business | Special Mention
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	18,485	3,402
Commercial business | Substandard
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	915,706	941,148
Commercial business | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	23,953,566	23,198,454
Agricultural business | Pass
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	10,158,226	9,336,899
Agricultural business | Special Mention
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	105,300	253,846
Agricultural business | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	10,263,526	9,590,745
Consumer loan | Pass
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	14,725,790	15,409,729
Consumer loan | Special Mention
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	74,075	153,316
Consumer loan | Substandard
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	139,224	192,928
Consumer loan | Corporate Credit Quality Indicator
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	$ 14,939,089	$ 15,755,973

XML

Disclosures about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities - Additional Information (Detail) (Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3), USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Impaired loans
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets fair value adjustments	$ (7,265)	$ (393,319)
Real estate owned
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets fair value adjustments	(143,497)	32,352
Mortgage servicing rights
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets fair value adjustments		$ (58,818)

XML

Investments - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Investment [Line Items]
Securities pledged as collateral	$ 24,254,000		$ 25,424,000
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase, book value	6,110,000		6,785,000
Gross realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities	527,000	109,000
Gross realized losses on sales of available-for-sale securities	0	0
Debt securities, fair value	$ 5,318,000
Percentage of available-for-sale investment portfolio	5.00%

XML

Quantitative Information About Unobservable Inputs Used In Recurring and Non recurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements (Detail) (Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3), USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Real estate owned
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on recurring and nonrecurring basis	$ 291,983
Valuation Technique	Market comparable properties
Unobservable Inputs	Comparability adjustments (%)
Impaired loans
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Range (Weighted Average)	25.00%
Assets measured at fair value on recurring and nonrecurring basis	$ 574,672
Valuation Technique	Market comparable properties
Unobservable Inputs	Marketability discount
Impaired loans | Minimum
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Range (Weighted Average)	20.00%
Impaired loans | Maximum
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Range (Weighted Average)	30.00%

XML

Amortized Cost and Approximate Fair Value of Available-for-Sale Securities (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	$ 105,687,436	$ 98,572,821
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized gains	5,026,275	4,112,688
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized losses	(80,131)	(63,461)
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	110,633,580	102,622,048
U.S. government and agencies
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	9,545,987	14,132,240
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized gains	235,594	211,540
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized losses	(468)	(8,137)
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	9,781,113	14,335,643
Mortgage-backed securities (government-sponsored enterprises - residential)
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	47,519,605	39,479,133
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized gains	1,398,291	905,509
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized losses		(20,556)
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	48,917,896	40,364,086
Municipal bonds
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	48,621,844	44,961,448
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized gains	3,392,390	2,995,639
Available-for-sale securities, gross unrealized losses	(79,663)	(34,768)
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	$ 51,934,571	$ 47,922,319

XML

Summary of ESOP Shares (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Disclosures [Line Items]
Unearned shares	34,983	38,495
Shares committed for release	1,079	1,038
Allocated shares	52,815	49,344
Total ESOP shares	88,877	88,877
Fair value of unearned shares	$ 591,213	$ 481,188

XML

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	$ 1,113,800	$ 1,113,800
Allowable Federal Home Loan Bank Stock in excess capital stock	$ 500,000,000
Percentage of Federal Home Loan Bank stock to excess stock outstanding	45.00%

XML

INVESTMENTS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Amortized Cost and Approximate Fair Value of Available-for-Sale Securities

The amortized cost and approximate fair value of securities, all of which are classified as available-for-sale, are as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2012:
U.S. government and agencies	$	9,545,987	$	235,594	$	(468	)	$	9,781,113
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		47,519,605		1,398,291		-			48,917,896
Municipal bonds		48,621,844		3,392,390		(79,663	)		51,934,571
	$	105,687,436	$	5,026,275	$	(80,131	)	$	110,633,580
December 31, 2011:
U.S. government and agencies	$	14,132,240	$	211,540	$	(8,137	)	$	14,335,643
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		39,479,133		905,509		(20,556	)		40,364,086
Municipal bonds		44,961,448		2,995,639		(34,768	)		47,922,319
	$	98,572,821	$	4,112,688	$	(63,461	)	$	102,622,048

Amortized Cost and Fair Value of Available-for-Sale Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Within one year	$	100,877	$	101,206
One to five years		6,922,630		7,231,133
Five to ten years		29,295,940		31,023,047
After ten years		21,848,384		23,360,298
		58,167,831		61,715,684
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		47,519,605		48,917,896
	$	105,687,436	$	110,633,580

Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value in Continuous Loss Position

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	Less Than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or More					Total
	Gross					Gross					Gross
	Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair
	Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value
June 30, 2012:
Municipal bonds	$	(79,663	)	$	4,818,867	$	-		$	-	$	(79,663	)	$	4,818,867
U.S. government and agencies		(468	)		499,533		-			-		(468	)		499,533
Total	$	(80,131	)	$	5,318,400	$	-		$	-	$	(80,131	)	$	5,318,400
December 31, 2011:
Municipal bonds	$	(34,768	)	$	2,234,403	$	-		$	-	$	(34,768	)	$	2,234,403
U.S. government and agencies		(8,137	)		1,491,864		-			-		(8,137	)		1,491,864
Subtotal		(42,905	)		3,726,267		-			-		(42,905	)		3,726,267
Mortgage-backed securities
(government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		(18,488	)		4,910,314		(2,068	)		623,455		(20,556	)		5,533,769
Total	$	(61,393	)	$	8,636,581	$	(2,068	)	$	623,455	$	(63,461	)	$	9,260,036

XML

Other Comprehensive Income Components and Related Taxes (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$ 1,267,807	$ 2,107,173	$ 1,423,825	$ 2,606,636
Less reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in income	301,580	55,713	526,908	109,218
Other comprehensive income before tax effect	966,227	2,051,460	896,917	2,497,418
Less tax expense	328,517	697,496	304,952	849,122
Other comprehensive income	$ 637,710	$ 1,353,964	$ 591,965	$ 1,648,296

XML

Recorded Balance at Original Cost of Troubled Debt Restructurings (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost	$ 2,208,834	$ 1,976,797
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost	245,211	213,966
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost	1,030,405	1,075,483
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost	111,349	125,588
Commercial business
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost	725,714	477,798
Consumer loan
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost	$ 96,155	$ 83,962

XML

Loan Portfolio Composition - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 Contract	Jun. 30, 2012 Contract
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Period that TDR's returned to accrual status after considering the borrower's sustained repayment performance		6 months
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment	$ 288,727	$ 339,035
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification	4	6
Troubled debt restructurings, restructuring period		P12M
Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loan commitments reimbursement period		30 days
Percentage of applicant's total monthly obligations to total monthly income		38.00%
Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Loans | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loan amount that requires risk rating verification		500,000
Officer | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Lending authority amount		500,000
Director | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Lending authority amount		1,000,000
Board of Directors | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Lending authority amount		1,000,000
Commercial and Agricultural Real Estate Loans
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Minimum ratio of property's projected net cash flow to loan's debt service requirement		120.00%
Commercial and Agricultural Real Estate Loans | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loan value that requires written appraisals from licensed or certified appraisers	250,000	250,000
Home equity | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Mortgage loans maturity term		10 years
One-to-four family residential | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Mortgage loans maturity term		30 years
One-to-four family residential | Adjustable rate loans
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Interest rate adjustments per year, maximum		0.02%
Interest rate adjustments cap on interest rate increases over the life of the loan	0.06%	0.06%
One-to-four family residential | Adjustable rate loans | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Mortgage loans maturity term		30 years
Mortgage loans adjustment term		5 years
One-to-four family residential | Adjustable rate loans | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Mortgage loans adjustment term		1 year
One-to-four family residential | Freddie Mac | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Mortgage loans maturity term		15 years
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial and Agricultural Real Estate Loans | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loan to value ratios		80.00%
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial and Agricultural Real Estate Loans | Adjustable rate loans | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Mortgage loans maturity term		5 years
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		6,041
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification		1
TDR's defaulted as they were more than 90 days past due		9,819
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification	1	1
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		44,267
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification		1
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Percentage of total applicant's monthly mortgage payment total monthly income		28.00%
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loan to value ratios		80.00%
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
TDR's defaulted as they were more than 90 days past due		28,000
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification	1	1
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial business
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		269,909
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification		2
Mortgage loans on real estate | Consumer loan
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		$ 18,818
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification		2
Home equity
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loan to value ratios		95.00%

XML

Fair Value Measurements of Assets Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis (Detail) (Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring, USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
U.S. government and agencies
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	$ 9,781,113	$ 14,335,643
Mortgage-backed securities (government-sponsored enterprises - residential)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	48,917,896	40,364,086
Municipal bonds
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	51,934,571	47,922,319
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | U.S. government and agencies
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	9,781,113	14,335,643
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Mortgage-backed securities (government-sponsored enterprises - residential)
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	48,917,896	40,364,086
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Municipal bonds
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items]
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	$ 51,934,571	$ 47,922,319

XML

Reconciliation of Income Tax Expense at Statutory Rate to Actual Income Tax Expense (Parenthetical) (Detail)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Statutory rate	34.00%	34.00%

XML

Amortized Cost and Fair Value of Available-for-Sale Securities (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost abstract
Within one year	$ 100,877
One to five years	6,922,630
Five to ten years	29,295,940
After ten years	21,848,384
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	105,687,436	98,572,821
Available-for-sale securities, fair value abstract
Within one year	101,206
One to five years	7,231,133
Five to ten years	31,023,047
After ten years	23,360,298
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	110,633,580	102,622,048
Investment securities
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost abstract
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	58,167,831
Available-for-sale securities, fair value abstract
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	61,715,684	62,257,962
Mortgage-backed securities
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost abstract
Available-for-sale securities, amortized cost	47,519,605
Available-for-sale securities, fair value abstract
Available-for-sale securities, fair value	$ 48,917,896	$ 40,364,086

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$ 1,761,813	$ 1,639,573
Depreciation, amortization and accretion:
Premises and equipment	166,365	155,589
Amortization of investment premiums and discounts, net	334,966	225,574
Accretion of loan discounts	(37,228)	(2,901)
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities	(526,908)	(109,218)
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	250,000	325,000
Mortgage banking operations, net	(213,732)	(66,577)
Gain on sale of real estate owned	(30,609)	(31,142)
Shares held by ESOP commited to be released	16,725	13,127
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised	1,291	4,609
Stock option compensation expense	22,479
Changes in income taxes payable	(205,437)	(7,178)
Changes in assets and liabilities	357,497	(393,449)
Net cash provided by operations before loan sales	1,897,222	1,753,007
Origination of loans for sale to secondary market	(23,066,615)	(7,348,818)
Proceeds from sales of loans to secondary market	23,082,599	7,467,242
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,913,206	1,871,431
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment and mortgage-backed securities	(33,802,052)	(33,369,259)
Purchases of interest-earning time deposits in other banks	(496,000)
Maturity or call of investment securities available-for-sale	7,328,000	6,255,000
Sale of investment securities available-for-sale	14,854,329	16,910,803
Principal payments on mortgage-backed and investment securities	4,707,101	3,589,255
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance	(2,000,000)
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned	327,395	198,699
Net (increase) decrease in loans	(1,551,536)	1,141,405
Additions to premises and equipment	(219,979)	(130,758)
Net cash used in investing activities	(10,852,742)	(5,404,855)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits	7,312,687	183,095
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings	(408,050)	135,227
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	212,046	86,009
Exercise of stock options	15,499	211,568
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock related to stock options		(181,941)
Dividends paid - common stock	(282,562)	(279,546)
Net cash provided by financing activities	6,849,620	154,412
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(2,089,916)	(3,379,012)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR	11,387,947	8,943,400
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	9,298,031	5,564,388
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest on deposits	1,213,658	1,695,106
Interest on other borrowings	6,683	9,801
Income taxes paid	872,000	589,000
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans	217,130	391,246
Loans to facilitate sales of real estate owned	$ 42,750	$ 131,834

XML

Recorded Balance at Original Cost of Troubled Debt Restructuring Which were Performing According to terms of Restructuring (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost, performing	$ 2,096,483	$ 1,797,242
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost, performing	245,211	131,990
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost, performing	1,002,405	1,007,723
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost, performing	101,530	95,769
Commercial business
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost, performing	725,714	477,798
Consumer loan
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, original cost, performing	$ 21,623	$ 83,962

XML

INCOME TAXES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Reconciliation of Income Tax Expense at Statutory Rate to Actual Income Tax Expense

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is shown below.

	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
Computed at the statutory rate (34%)	$	825,321		$	772,274
Increase (decrease) resulting from Tax exempt interest		(268,978	)		(249,046	)
State income taxes, net		141,573			135,251
Increase in cash surrender value		(32,054	)		(27,063	)
Other, net		(261	)		406
Actual tax expense	$	665,601		$	631,822

XML

MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Activity in Balance of Mortgage Servicing Rights Measured Using Amortization Method

Activity in the balance of mortgage servicing rights, measured using the amortization method, for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Balance, beginning of year	$	697,733		$	797,327
Servicing rights capitalized		96,131			137,206
Amortization of servicing rights		(150,425	)		(226,998	)
Change in valuation allowance		24,808			(9,802	)
Balance, end of period	$	668,247		$	697,733

Activity in Valuation Allowance for Mortgage Servicing Rights

Activity in the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Balance, beginning of year	$	173,791		$	163,989
Additions		-			58,818
Reductions		(24,808	)		(49,016	)
Balance, end of period	$	148,983		$	173,791

XML

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments and Level within Fair Value Hierarchy (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 9,298,031
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans
Letters of credit
Lines of credit
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Financial Assets
Interest earning time deposits in banks	2,972,000
Other investments	106,038
Loans held for sale	674,052
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	1,113,800
Interest receivable	2,083,481
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	127,993,795
Short-term borrowings	6,109,700
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance	952,129
Interest payable	323,926
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans
Letters of credit
Lines of credit
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial Assets
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	170,878,318
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	136,711,695
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans
Letters of credit
Lines of credit
Carrying Amount
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	9,298,031	11,387,947
Interest earning time deposits in banks	2,972,000	2,476,000
Other investments	106,038	116,088
Loans held for sale	674,052	446,818
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	172,029,486	170,865,102
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	1,113,800	1,113,800
Interest receivable	2,083,481	2,071,534
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	261,552,747	254,240,060
Short-term borrowings	6,109,700	6,517,750
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance	952,129	740,083
Interest payable	323,926	349,121
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans
Letters of credit
Lines of credit
Fair Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		11,387,947
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,476,000
Other investments		116,088
Loans held for sale		446,818
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		169,667,091
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800
Interest receivable		2,071,534
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		265,515,126
Short-term borrowings		6,517,750
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		740,083
Interest payable		349,121
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans
Letters of credit
Lines of credit

XML

Loans Modified as Troubled Debt Restructuring (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012 Contract	Jun. 30, 2012 Contract
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification	4	6
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment	$ 288,727	$ 339,035
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification		1
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		44,267
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification		1
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		6,041
Agricultural business
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment		6,041
Commercial business
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification	2	2
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment	269,909	269,909
Consumer loan
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings, number of modification	2	2
Troubled debt restructurings, recorded investment	$ 18,818	$ 18,818

XML

Earnings Per Share Calculations for Basic and Diluted Methods (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted, by Common Class [Line Items]
Net income available to common shareholders	$ 847,063	$ 904,834	$ 1,761,813	$ 1,639,573
Basic average shares outstanding	1,886,211	1,891,706	1,885,638	1,888,670
Diluted potential common shares:
Stock option equivalents	475		326
Diluted average shares outstanding	1,886,686	1,891,706	1,885,964	1,888,670
Basic earnings per share	$ 0.45	$ 0.48	$ 0.93	$ 0.87
Diluted earnings per share	$ 0.45	$ 0.48	$ 0.93	$ 0.87

XML

Earnings Per Share - Additional Information (Detail)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted, by Common Class [Line Items]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share	104,035	4,504	104,035	4,504

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parenthetical) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Dividends, per share	$ 0.15

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jul. 14, 2010 Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), Plan
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Disclosures [Line Items]
Common stock, shares issued in stock offerings		41,614
ESOP shares, percentage of common stock issued in the offering		4.00%
Loan repayment term, maximum		20 years
ESOP 100% vesting period		6 years
Options awarded to purchase common stock	104,035
Share based payment Award, options, vesting period	5 years
Share based payment award, options, expiration period	10 years
Closing price per share	$ 16.90

XML

Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	$ 888,098	$ 1,033,227
60-89 Days Past Due	107,128	338,186
Greater than 90 Days Past Due	795,346	1,303,818
Total Past Due	1,790,572	2,675,231
Current	173,365,615	171,526,199
Loans receivable gross	175,156,187	174,201,430	177,920,254
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	16,042,788	17,939,927
Mortgage loans on real estate
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	126,000,006	125,656,258
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	496,878	289,337
60-89 Days Past Due	100,178	161,654
Greater than 90 Days Past Due	264,707	1,020,862
Total Past Due	861,763	1,471,853
Current	40,431,438	38,000,155
Loans receivable gross	41,293,201	39,472,008	38,208,843
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	91,177	75,924
Greater than 90 Days Past Due	46,778	48,428
Total Past Due	137,955	124,352
Current	37,730,056	40,045,461
Loans receivable gross	37,868,011	40,169,813	43,011,180
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Mortgage loans on real estate | Agricultural
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Current	32,612,241	29,971,649
Loans receivable gross	32,612,241	29,971,649	31,632,558
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	145,859	511,562
60-89 Days Past Due		50,455
Greater than 90 Days Past Due	452,108	197,191
Total Past Due	597,967	759,208
Current	13,628,586	15,283,580
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	16,042,788
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Commercial business
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Greater than 90 Days Past Due	16,576
Total Past Due	16,576
Current	23,936,990	23,198,454
Loans receivable gross	23,953,566	23,198,454	22,430,621
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Agricultural business
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Current	10,263,526	9,590,745
Loans receivable gross	10,263,526	9,590,745	8,503,056
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing
Consumer loan
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	154,184	156,404
60-89 Days Past Due	6,950	126,077
Greater than 90 Days Past Due	15,177	37,337
Total Past Due	176,311	319,818
Current	14,762,778	15,436,155
Loans receivable gross	14,939,089	15,755,973	16,194,069
Total Loans >90 Days & Accruing

XML

Fair Value Measurements of Assets Measured at Fair Value on Nonrecurring Basis and Level within Fair Value Hierarchy (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Impaired loans
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$ 574,672	$ 867,318
Mortgage servicing rights
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis		697,733
Real estate owned
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	291,983	435,480
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Impaired loans
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	574,672	867,318
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Mortgage servicing rights
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis		697,733
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Real estate owned
Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$ 291,983	$ 435,480

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 9,298,031	$ 11,387,947
Interest-earning time deposits in banks	2,972,000	2,476,000
Available for sale	110,633,580	102,622,048
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	1,113,800	1,113,800
Other investment securities	106,038	116,088
Loans held for sale - net	674,052	446,818
Loans receivable - net of allowance for loan losses of $3,130,503 and $3,296,607 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	172,029,486	170,865,102
Premises and equipment - net	5,586,334	5,532,720
Cash surrender value of life insurance	6,502,054	4,402,602
Accrued interest receivable	2,083,481	2,071,534
Goodwill	2,726,567	2,726,567
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net of valuation allowance of $148,983 and $173,791 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	668,247	697,733
Real estate owned	291,983	435,480
Deferred income taxes	108,944	413,110
Other assets	2,112,935	1,981,808
Total Assets	316,907,532	307,289,357
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits	261,552,747	254,240,060
Other borrowings	6,109,700	6,517,750
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	952,129	740,083
Accrued interest payable	323,926	349,121
Deferred compensation payable	3,467,536	3,295,827
Other liabilities	1,208,861	981,093
Total liabilities	273,614,899	266,123,934
Commitments and contingencies
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value - authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 1,922,156 shares as of June 30, 2012 and 1,920,955 shares as of December 31, 2011	19,222	19,210
Additional paid-in-capital	16,111,816	16,066,624
Retained earnings	24,246,970	22,767,719
Less: Unallocated ESOP shares	(349,830)	(360,620)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	3,264,455	2,672,490
Total stockholders' equity	43,292,633	41,165,423
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	316,907,532	307,289,357
Investment securities
ASSETS
Available for sale	61,715,684	62,257,962
Mortgage-backed securities
ASSETS
Available for sale	$ 48,917,896	$ 40,364,086

XML

Nonaccrual Loans (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual loans excludes performing troubled debt restructurings	$ 2,120,267	$ 2,400,467
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual loans excludes performing troubled debt restructurings	636,919	1,297,953
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual loans excludes performing troubled debt restructurings	632,877	361,524
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual loans excludes performing troubled debt restructurings	668,595	423,113
Commercial business
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual loans excludes performing troubled debt restructurings	75,147	66,852
Consumer loan
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual loans excludes performing troubled debt restructurings	$ 106,729	$ 251,025

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Unrealized appreciation on available- for-sale securities, tax	$ 431,054	$ 716,438	$ 484,101	$ 886,256
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income, tax	$ 102,537	$ 18,942	$ 179,149	$ 37,134

XML

Activity in Valuation Allowance for Mortgage Servicing Rights (Detail) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Valuation Allowance for Impairment of Recognized Servicing Assets [Line Items]
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, valuation allowance , balance beginning of year	$ 173,791	$ 163,989
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, valuation allowance additions		58,818
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, valuation allowance , reductions	(24,808)	(49,016)
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, valuation allowance , balance end of period	$ 148,983	$ 173,791

XML

Weighted Average Assumptions used in Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (Detail) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Schedule of Benefit Obligations Weighted Average Assumptions [Line Items]
Risk-free interest rate	1.37%
Expected dividend yield	2.19%
Expected stock volatility	33.41%
Expected life (years)	7 years
Fair value	$ 4.34

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share Calculations for Basic and Diluted Methods

The following reflects earnings per share calculations for basic and diluted methods:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income available to common shareholders	$	847,063	$	904,834	$	1,761,813	$	1,639,573
Basic average shares outstanding		1,886,211		1,891,706		1,885,638		1,888,670
Diluted potential common shares:
Stock option equivalents		475		-		326		-
Diluted average shares outstanding		1,886,686		1,891,706		1,885,964		1,888,670
Basic earnings per share	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87

XML

Composition of Loan Portfolio (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	$ 175,156,187	$ 174,201,430	$ 177,920,254
Net deferred loan fees	(3,802)	39,721
Allowance for loan losses	3,130,503	3,296,607
Net loans	172,029,486	170,865,102
Loan portfolio, percentage	101.80%	102.00%
Net deferred loan fees	0.00%	0.00%
Allowance for loan losses	1.80%	1.90%
Total loans receivable, net	100.00%	100.00%
Home equity
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	16,042,788	17,939,927
Mortgage loans on real estate
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	126,000,006	125,656,258
Loan portfolio, percentage	73.20%	73.50%
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	41,293,201	39,472,008	38,208,843
Loan portfolio, percentage	24.00%	23.10%
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	37,868,011	40,169,813	43,011,180
Loan portfolio, percentage	22.00%	23.50%
Mortgage loans on real estate | Agricultural
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	32,612,241	29,971,649	31,632,558
Loan portfolio, percentage	19.00%	17.50%
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	16,042,788
Loan portfolio, percentage	8.30%	9.40%
Commercial business
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	23,953,566	23,198,454	22,430,621
Loan portfolio, percentage	13.90%	13.60%
Agricultural business
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	10,263,526	9,590,745	8,503,056
Loan portfolio, percentage	6.00%	5.60%
Consumer loan
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Loans receivable gross	$ 14,939,089	$ 15,755,973	$ 16,194,069
Loan portfolio, percentage	8.70%	9.20%

XML

LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Composition of Loan Portfolio

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio is shown below.

	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Amount			Percent			Amount		Percent
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	41,293,201			24.0	%	$	39,472,008		23.1	%
Commercial		37,868,011			22.0			40,169,813		23.5
Agricultural		32,612,241			19.0			29,971,649		17.5
Home equity		14,226,553			8.3			16,042,788		9.4
Total real estate loans		126,000,006			73.2			125,656,258		73.5
Commercial loans		23,953,566			13.9			23,198,454		13.6
Agricultural loans		10,263,526			6.0			9,590,745		5.6
Consumer loans		14,939,089			8.7			15,755,973		9.2
Total loans receivable		175,156,187			101.8			174,201,430		102.0
Less:
Net deferred loan fees		(3,802	)		(0.0	)		39,721		0.0
Allowance for loan losses		3,130,503			1.8			3,296,607		1.9
Total loans receivable, net	$	172,029,486			100.0	%	$	170,865,102		100.0	%

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans Based on Portfolio Segment and Impairment Method

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2012, June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Home Equity			Commercial		Agricultural			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance, April 1, 2012	$	667,641		$	1,098,838		$	123,105		$	349,467		$	708,016	$	62,562		$	128,927		$	192,355		$	3,330,911
Provision charged to expense		11,488			119,900			(74,187	)		(9,516	)		103,614		(26,528	)		80,192			(34,963	)		170,000
Losses charged off		(70,295	)		(257,043	)		-			(20,000	)		-		-			(50,421	)		-			(397,759	)
Recoveries		20,618			-			-			5,980			-		-			753			-			27,351
Ending balance, June 30, 2012	$	629,452		$	961,695		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	811,630	$	36,034		$	159,451		$	157,392		$	3,130,503
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2012	$	697,223		$	1,107,585		$	115,154		$	309,409		$	711,864	$	58,428		$	138,385		$	158,559		$	3,296,607
Provision charged to expense		(19,719	)		111,153			(66,236	)		76,761			99,450		(22,394	)		72,152			(1,167	)		250,000
Losses charged off		(70,295	)		(257,043	)		-			(66,744	)		-		-			(53,385	)		-			(447,467	)
Recoveries		22,243			-			-			6,505			316		-			2,299			-			31,363
Ending balance, June 30, 2012	$	629,452		$	961,695		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	811,630	$	36,034		$	159,451		$	157,392		$	3,130,503
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	-		$	137,608		$	-		$	-		$	515,688	$	-		$	7,359		$	-		$	660,655
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	629,452		$	824,087		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	295,942	$	36,034		$	152,092		$	157,392		$	2,469,848
Loans:
Ending balance	$	41,293,201		$	37,868,011		$	32,612,241		$	14,226,553		$	23,953,566	$	10,263,526		$	14,939,089		$	-		$	175,156,187
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	286,800		$	1,389,183		$	-		$	58,090		$	752,809	$	-		$	7,359		$	-		$	2,494,241
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	41,006,401		$	36,478,828		$	32,612,241		$	14,168,463		$	23,200,757	$	10,263,526		$	14,931,730		$	-		$	172,661,946

	June 30, 2011
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate		Home Equity			Commercial			Agricultural		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance, April 1, 2011	$	514,330		$	1,093,553		$	104,867	$	267,660		$	506,317		$	141,044	$	121,873		$	129,606	$	2,879,250
Provision charged to expense		72,461			50,535			7,341		8,713			(52,393	)		11,375		4,490			47,478		150,000
Losses charged off		(24,809	)		-			-		-			-			-		-			-		(24,809	)
Recoveries		-			700			-		1,275			153,609			-		801			-		156,385
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	561,982		$	1,144,788		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	607,533		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	3,160,826
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2011	$	561,309		$	1,193,928		$	92,988	$	300,257		$	472,376		$	58,250	$	163,690		$	121,487	$	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense		32,884			202,803			19,220		(23,589	)		(18,652	)		94,169		(37,432	)		55,597		325,000
Losses charged off		(32,211	)		(260,785	)		-		(4,162	)		-			-		(1,097	)		-		(298,255	)
Recoveries		-			8,842			-		5,142			153,809			-		2,003			-		169,796
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	561,982		$	1,144,788		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	607,533		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	3,160,826
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	89,795		$	314,285		$	-	$	-		$	227,698		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	631,778
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	472,187		$	830,503		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	379,835		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	2,529,048
Loans:
Ending balance	$	38,208,843		$	43,011,180		$	31,632,558	$	17,939,927		$	22,430,621		$	8,503,056	$	16,194,069		$	-	$	177,920,254
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	639,589		$	1,754,057		$	-	$	-		$	570,677		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	2,964,323
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	37,569,254		$	41,257,123		$	31,632,558	$	17,939,927		$	21,859,944		$	8,503,056	$	16,194,069		$	-	$	174,955,931

	December 31, 2011
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate		Home Equity			Commercial		Agricultural		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	561,309		$	1,193,928		$	92,988	$	300,257		$	472,376	$	58,250	$	163,690		$	121,487	$	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense		266,296			195,118			22,166		26,863			83,654		178		(6,347	)		37,072		625,000
Losses charged off		(130,382	)		(306,303	)		-		(24,904	)		-		-		(25,289	)		-		(486,878	)
Recoveries		-			24,842			-		7,193			155,834		-		6,331			-		194,200
Balance, end of year	$	697,223		$	1,107,585		$	115,154	$	309,409		$	711,864	$	58,428	$	138,385		$	158,559	$	3,296,607
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	36,300		$	357,880		$	-	$	-		$	296,149	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	690,329
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	660,923		$	749,705		$	115,154	$	309,409		$	415,715	$	58,428	$	138,385		$	158,559	$	2,606,278
Loans:
Ending balance	$	39,472,008		$	40,169,813		$	29,971,649	$	16,042,788		$	23,198,454	$	9,590,745	$	15,755,973		$	-	$	174,201,430
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	551,921		$	1,727,406		$	-	$	29,353		$	552,814	$	-	$	7,569		$	-	$	2,869,063
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	38,920,087		$	38,442,407		$	29,971,649	$	16,013,435		$	22,645,640	$	9,590,745	$	15,748,404		$	-	$	171,332,367

Credit Risk Profile of Loan Portfolio Based on Rating Category and Payment Activity

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	1-4 Family				Commercial Real Estate				Agricultural Real Estate				Home Equity
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Rating:
Pass	$	38,761,356	$	36,040,795	$	34,980,711	$	36,936,906	$	32,612,241	$	29,567,057	$	13,095,024	$	14,746,631
Special Mention		1,221,466		1,642,602		582,523		574,484		-		404,592		169,610		278,323
Substandard		1,310,379		1,788,611		2,304,777		2,658,423		-		-		961,919		1,017,834
Total	$	41,293,201	$	39,472,008	$	37,868,011	$	40,169,813	$	32,612,241	$	29,971,649	$	14,226,553	$	16,042,788
	Commercial				Agricultural				Consumer				Total
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Rating:
Pass	$	23,019,375	$	22,253,904	$	10,158,226	$	9,336,899	$	14,725,790	$	15,409,729	$	167,352,723	$	164,291,921
Special Mention		18,485		3,402		105,300		253,846		74,075		153,316		2,171,459		3,310,565
Substandard		915,706		941,148		-		-		139,224		192,928		5,632,005		6,598,944
Total	$	23,953,566	$	23,198,454	$	10,263,526	$	9,590,745	$	14,939,089	$	15,755,973	$	175,156,187	$	174,201,430

Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis

The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio aging analysis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90		Total						Total Loans >90
	Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Days & Accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	496,878	$	100,178	$	264,707	$	861,763	$	40,431,438	$	41,293,201	$	-
Commercial real estate		91,177		-		46,778		137,955		37,730,056		37,868,011		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-		32,612,241		32,612,241		-
Home equity		145,859				452,108		597,967		13,628,586		14,226,553		-
Commercial		-		-		16,576		16,576		23,936,990		23,953,566		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		10,263,526		10,263,526		-
Consumer		154,184		6,950		15,177		176,311		14,762,778		14,939,089		-
Total	$	888,098	$	107,128	$	795,346	$	1,790,572	$	173,365,615	$	175,156,187	$	-

	December 31, 2011
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90		Total						Total Loans >90
	Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Days & Accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	289,337	$	161,654	$	1,020,862	$	1,471,853	$	38,000,155	$	39,472,008	$	-
Commercial real estate		75,924		-		48,428		124,352		40,045,461		40,169,813		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-		29,971,649		29,971,649		-
Home equity		511,562		50,455		197,191		759,208		15,283,580		16,042,788		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		23,198,454		23,198,454		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		9,590,745		9,590,745		-
Consumer		156,404		126,077		37,337		319,818		15,436,155		15,755,973		-
Total	$	1,033,227	$	338,186	$	1,303,818	$	2,675,231	$	171,526,199	$	174,201,430	$	-

Impaired Loans

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	286,800	$	286,800	$	-	$	287,253	$	4,238	$	4,427
Commercial real estate		293,163		293,163		-		298,241		14,445		14,546
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		72,018		1,556		1,619
Loans with a specific allowance:
Commercial real estate		1,096,020		1,096,020		137,608		1,144,327		10,365		9,385
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		786,002		15,369		23,374
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,491		145		200
Total:
One-to-four family residential		286,800		286,800		-		287,253		4,238		4,427
Commercial real estate		1,389,183		1,389,183		137,608		1,442,568		24,810		23,931
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		786,002		15,369		23,374
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		72,018		1,556		1,619
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,491		145		200
Total	$	2,494,241	$	2,494,241	$	660,655	$	2,595,332	$	46,118	$	53,551

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	286,800	$	286,800	$	-	$	287,387	$	6,694	$	6,714
Commercial real estate		293,163		293,163		-		310,295		15,298		15,462
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		70,889		2,287		2,368
Loans with a specific allowance:
Commercial real estate		1,096,020		1,096,020		137,608		1,146,774		34,593		34,675
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		791,202		24,434		32,485
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,530		313		300
Total:
One-to-four family residential		286,800		286,800		-		287,387		6,694		6,714
Commercial real estate		1,389,183		1,389,183		137,608		1,457,069		49,891		50,137
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		791,202		24,434		32,485
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		70,889		2,287		2,368
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,530		313		300
Total	$	2,494,241	$	2,494,241	$	660,655	$	2,614,077	$	83,619	$	92,004

	December 31, 2011
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	235,856	$	235,856	$	-	$	249,103	$	10,446	$	11,162
Commercial real estate		69,249		69,249		-		71,972		457		254
Home equity		29,353		29,353		-		21,954		1,933		1,605
Loans with a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential		316,065		316,065		36,300		368,040		25,241		18,341
Commercial real estate		1,658,157		1,658,157		357,880		1,726,905		88,084		117,289
Commercial		552,814		552,814		296,149		592,796		37,192		36,628
Consumer		7,569		7,569		-		7,569		37		-
Total:
One-to-four family residential		551,921		551,921		36,300		617,143		35,687		29,503
Commercial real estate		1,727,406		1,727,406		357,880		1,798,877		88,541		117,543
Commercial		552,814		552,814		296,149		592,796		37,192		36,628
Home equity		7,569		7,569		-		7,569		37		-
Consumer		29,353		29,353		-		21,954		1,933		1,605
Total	$	2,869,063	$	2,869,063	$	690,329	$	3,038,339	$	163,390	$	185,279

Recorded Balance at Original Cost of Troubled Debt Restructurings

The following table presents the recorded balance, at original cost, of TDR’s, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	245,211	$	213,966
Commercial real estate		1,030,405		1,075,483
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		111,349		125,588
Commercial loans		725,714		477,798
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		96,155		83,962
Total	$	2,208,834	$	1,976,797

Recorded Balance at Original Cost of Troubled Debt Restructurings which were Performing According to Terms of Restructuring

The following table presents the recorded balance, at original cost, of TDR’s, which were performing according to the terms of the restructuring, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	245,211	$	131,990
Commercial real estate		1,002,405		1,007,723
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		101,530		95,769
Commercial loans		725,714		477,798
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		21,623		83,962
Total	$	2,096,483	$	1,797,242

Loans Modified as Troubled Debt Restructurings

The following table presents loans modified as TDR’s during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012				June 30, 2012
	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
	Modifications		Investment		Modifications		Investment
One-to-four family residential		-	$	-		1	$	44,267
Commercial real estate		-		-		-		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-
Home equity		-		-		1		6,041
Commercial loans		2		269,909		2		269,909
Agricultural loans		-		-		-		-
Consumer loans		2		18,818		2		18,818
Total		4	$	288,727		6	$	339,035

Nonaccrual Loans

The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  This table excludes performing troubled debt restructurings.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	636,919	$	1,297,953
Commercial real estate		632,877		361,524
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		668,595		423,113
Commercial loans		75,147		66,852
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		106,729		251,025
Total	$	2,120,267	$	2,400,467

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $)	Total	Nonqualified Stock Options	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Additional Paid-in Capital Nonqualified Stock Options	Retained Earnings	Unallocated ESOP Shares	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
BEGINNING BALANCE at Dec. 31, 2011	$ 41,165,423		$ 19,210	$ 16,066,624		$ 22,767,719	$ (360,620)	$ 2,672,490
Net Income	1,761,813					1,761,813
Other comprehensive income	591,965							591,965
Exercise of stock options	15,499		12	15,487
Tax benefit of non-qualified options		1,291			1,291
Vesting options expense	22,479			22,479
Shares held by ESOP, commited to be released	16,725			5,935			10,790
Dividends ($0.15 per share)	(282,562)					(282,562)
ENDING BALANCE at Jun. 30, 2012	$ 43,292,633		$ 19,222	$ 16,111,816		$ 24,246,970	$ (349,830)	$ 3,264,455

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Loans receivable, allowance for loan losses	$ 3,130,503	$ 3,296,607
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, valuation allowance	$ 148,983	$ 173,791
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, issued
Preferred stock, outstanding
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Common stock, issued	1,922,156	1,920,955

XML

DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

8. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  There is a hierarchy of three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities

Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

Recurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets  recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			June 30,2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. Government and
agencies	$	9,781,113	$	-	$	9,781,113	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities
(Government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		48,917,896		-		48,917,896		-
Municipal bonds		51,934,571		-		51,934,571		-

			December 31, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. Government and
agencies	$	14,335,643	$	-	$	14,335,643	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities
(Government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		40,364,086		-		40,364,086		-
Municipal bonds		47,922,319		-		47,922,319		-

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the period ended June 30, 2012.

Available-for-Sale Securities - Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.  The Company has no Level 1 securities.  If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows.  For those investments, the inputs used by the pricing service to determine fair value may include one, or a combination of, observable inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data market research publications are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.  Level 2 securities include U.S. Government and agencies, mortgage-backed securities (Government-sponsored enterprises – residential) and municipal bonds.  In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.  The Company did not have securities considered Level 3 as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets  for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans
(collateral dependent)	$	574,672	$	-	$	-	$	574,672
Real estate owned		291,983		-		-		291,983

			December 31, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans
(collateral dependent)	$	867,318	$	-	$	-	$	867,318
Mortgage servicing rights		697,733						697,733
Real estate owned		435,480		-		-		435,480

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent) - The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value.  Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral.  Fair value adjustments on impaired loans were $(7,265) at June 30, 2012 and $(393,319) at December 31, 2011.

Mortgage Servicing Rights – Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices.  Accordingly, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models having significant inputs of discount rate, prepayment speed and default rate.  Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Mortgage servicing rights are tested for impairment on at least an annual basis.  The Company uses a third-party to measure mortgage servicing rights through the completion of a proprietary model.  Inputs to the model are reviewed by the Company.  Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights were $(58,818) at December 31, 2011.

Real Estate Owned – Real estate owned (REO) is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell when the real estate is acquired.  Estimated fair value of REO is based on appraisals or evaluations.  REO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Appraisals of REO are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  Fair value adjustments on real estate owned were $(143,497) at June 30, 2012 and $32,352 at December 31, 2011.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements (dollars in thousands).

	Fair Value at 6/30/12		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Real estate owned	$	291,983	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments (%)	Not available
Collateral-dependent impaired loans		574,672	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount	20% – 30% (25%)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices		Significant
			in Active		Other		Significant
			Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,298,031	$	9,298,031	$	-	$	-
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,972,000		-		2,972,000		-
Other investments		106,038		-		106,038		-
Loans held for sale		674,052		-		674,052		-
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		172,029,486		-		-		170,878,318
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800		-		1,113,800		-
Interest receivable		2,083,481		-		2,083,481		-
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		261,552,747		-		127,993,795		136,711,695
Short-term borrowings		6,109,700		-		6,109,700		-
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		952,129		-		952,129		-
Interest payable		323,926		-		323,926		-
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans		-		-		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-		-		-
Lines of credit		-		-		-		-

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,387,947	$	11,387,947
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,476,000		2,476,000
Other investments		116,088		116,088
Loans held for sale		446,818		446,818
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		170,865,102		169,667,091
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800		1,113,800
Interest receivable		2,071,534		2,071,534
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		254,240,060		265,515,126
Short-term borrowings		6,517,750		6,517,750
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		740,083		740,083
Interest payable		349,121		349,121
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-
Lines of credit		-		-

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Interest-Earning Time Deposits in Banks, Interest Receivable, Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, and Other Investments - The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Loans Held for Sale - For homogeneous categories of loans, such as mortgage loans held for sale, fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics.

Loans - The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the market rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.  Loans with similar characteristics were aggregated for purposes of the calculations.  The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

Deposits - Deposits include demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and certain money market deposits.  The carrying amount approximates fair value.  The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-term Borrowings, Interest Payable, and Advances from Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance - The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Commitments to Originate Loans, Letters of Credit, and Lines of Credit - The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.  For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.  The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Aug. 01, 2012
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Trading Symbol	JXSB
Entity Registrant Name	JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	0001484949
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,920,955

XML

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK

9. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK

The Company owns $1,113,800 of Federal Home Loan Bank stock as of June 30, 2012.  The Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLB) has been operating under a Cease and Desist Order from their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).  The FHFA terminated the Cease and Desist Order during April 2012.  The FHLB’s new capital structure and excess stock repurchase plan has been approved by the FHFA.  The repurchase plan allows for the FHLB to repurchase approximately $500 million in excess capital stock held by members which will represent 45% of the excess stock outstanding.  The FHLB will continue to provide liquidity and funding through advances and purchasing loans through the MPF program.  In 2012 and 2011, the FHLB declared and paid quarterly dividends.  Management performed an analysis and deemed the cost method investment in FHLB stock was ultimately recoverable.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$ 2,461,445	$ 2,711,572	$ 5,001,988	$ 5,366,978
Investment securities	501,739	516,333	1,026,241	1,002,231
Mortgage-backed securities	252,869	366,951	458,194	646,715
Other	12,245	640	23,766	2,339
Total interest income	3,228,298	3,595,496	6,510,189	7,018,263
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	583,718	747,041	1,188,464	1,547,130
Other borrowings	3,892	5,238	6,683	9,865
Total interest expense	587,610	752,279	1,195,147	1,556,995
NET INTEREST INCOME	2,640,688	2,843,217	5,315,042	5,461,268
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	170,000	150,000	250,000	325,000
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	2,470,688	2,693,217	5,065,042	5,136,268
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Fiduciary activities	60,944	57,688	138,720	117,708
Commission income	265,811	347,187	512,228	759,927
Service charges on deposit accounts	208,992	232,858	399,494	452,023
Mortgage banking operations, net	96,606	58,689	213,732	66,577
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities	301,580	55,713	526,908	109,218
Loan servicing fees	88,767	92,243	179,029	186,605
Other	163,083	130,331	320,057	267,414
Total non-interest income	1,185,783	974,709	2,290,168	1,959,472
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	1,602,441	1,554,657	3,175,383	3,083,776
Occupancy and equipment	241,759	255,588	490,012	494,828
Data processing and telecommunications	140,551	137,935	270,194	284,361
Professional	81,821	46,226	133,250	96,607
Postage and office supplies	68,090	62,591	134,249	139,851
Deposit insurance premium	38,452	53,830	77,419	150,456
Other	337,581	283,858	647,289	574,466
Total non-interest expense	2,510,695	2,394,685	4,927,796	4,824,345
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	1,145,776	1,273,241	2,427,414	2,271,395
INCOME TAXES	298,713	368,407	665,601	631,822
NET INCOME	$ 847,063	$ 904,834	$ 1,761,813	$ 1,639,573
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$ 0.45	$ 0.48	$ 0.93	$ 0.87
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED	$ 0.45	$ 0.48	$ 0.93	$ 0.87

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

EARNINGS PER SHARE

3.   EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings Per Share - Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares.  Diluted earnings per share considers the potential effects of the exercise of the outstanding stock options under the Company’s stock option plans.

The following reflects earnings per share calculations for basic and diluted methods:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income available to common shareholders	$	847,063	$	904,834	$	1,761,813	$	1,639,573
Basic average shares outstanding		1,886,211		1,891,706		1,885,638		1,888,670
Diluted potential common shares:
Stock option equivalents		475		-		326		-
Diluted average shares outstanding		1,886,686		1,891,706		1,885,964		1,888,670
Basic earnings per share	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.45	$	0.48	$	0.93	$	0.87

Stock options for 104,035 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2012, because they were anti-dilutive.  Stock options for 4,504 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, because they were anti-dilutive.

XML

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

2.   NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements by U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of FASB ASC Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed.  This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively.  For public entities, the amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early application by public entities was not permitted.  The adoption of this ASU is reflected in Note 8 – Disclosures about Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income.  Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income.  This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.  The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.  The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively.  For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early adoption was permitted.  The Company retrospectively adopted the ASU during the first quarter of 2012 with separate condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment.  The update provides entities with the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.  However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit.  If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.  Under the amendments in ASU No. 2011-08, an entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test.  An entity may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.  The amendments enacted by ASU No. 2011-08 are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for the nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.  The adoption of this update did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.  ASU 2011-11 requires an entity to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement.  ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Retrospective disclosure is required for all comparative periods presented.  The adoption of this update did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Summary of ESOP Shares

A summary of ESOP shares at June 30, 2012 and 2011 is shown below.

	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Unearned shares		34,983		38,495
Shares committed for release		1,079		1,038
Allocated shares		52,815		49,344
Total ESOP shares		88,877		88,877
Fair value of unearned shares	$	591,213	$	481,188

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Instrinsic
	Options			Price/Share		Life (in years)		Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		4,504		$	13.98
Granted		104,035			15.65
Exercised		(1,201	)		13.98
Forfeited		-			-
Outstanding, June 30, 2012		107,338		$	15.60		9.75	$	139,539
Exercisable, June 30, 2012		3,303		$	13.98		2.00	$	9,645

Weighted Average Assumptions used in Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model

The weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the year indicated were as follows:

	2012
Risk-free interest rate		1.37	%
Expected dividend yield		2.19	%
Expected stock volatility		33.41	%
Expected life (years)		7.00
Fair value	$	4.34

XML

MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

10. MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

Activity in the balance of mortgage servicing rights, measured using the amortization method, for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Balance, beginning of year	$	697,733		$	797,327
Servicing rights capitalized		96,131			137,206
Amortization of servicing rights		(150,425	)		(226,998	)
Change in valuation allowance		24,808			(9,802	)
Balance, end of period	$	668,247		$	697,733

Activity in the valuation allowance for mortgage servicing rights for the six month period ending June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Balance, beginning of year	$	173,791		$	163,989
Additions		-			58,818
Reductions		(24,808	)		(49,016	)
Balance, end of period	$	148,983		$	173,791

XML

INVESTMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

INVESTMENTS

6. INVESTMENTS

The amortized cost and approximate fair value of securities, all of which are classified as available-for-sale, are as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2012:
U.S. government and agencies	$	9,545,987	$	235,594	$	(468	)	$	9,781,113
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		47,519,605		1,398,291		-			48,917,896
Municipal bonds		48,621,844		3,392,390		(79,663	)		51,934,571
	$	105,687,436	$	5,026,275	$	(80,131	)	$	110,633,580
December 31, 2011:
U.S. government and agencies	$	14,132,240	$	211,540	$	(8,137	)	$	14,335,643
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		39,479,133		905,509		(20,556	)		40,364,086
Municipal bonds		44,961,448		2,995,639		(34,768	)		47,922,319
	$	98,572,821	$	4,112,688	$	(63,461	)	$	102,622,048

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Within one year	$	100,877	$	101,206
One to five years		6,922,630		7,231,133
Five to ten years		29,295,940		31,023,047
After ten years		21,848,384		23,360,298
		58,167,831		61,715,684
Mortgage-backed securities (government-
sponsored enterprises - residential)		47,519,605		48,917,896
	$	105,687,436	$	110,633,580

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $24,254,000 at June 30, 2012 and $25,424,000 at December 31, 2011.

The book value of securities sold under agreement to repurchase amounted to $6,110,000 at June 30, 2012 and $6,785,000 at December 31, 2011.

Gross gains of $527,000 and $109,000 and gross losses of $0 resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were realized during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost.  Total fair value of these investments at June 30, 2012 was $5,318,000, which is approximately 5% of the Company’s available-for-sale investment portfolio.

Management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.  Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	Less Than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or More					Total
	Gross					Gross					Gross
	Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair
	Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value
June 30, 2012:
Municipal bonds	$	(79,663	)	$	4,818,867	$	-		$	-	$	(79,663	)	$	4,818,867
U.S. government and agencies		(468	)		499,533		-			-		(468	)		499,533
Total	$	(80,131	)	$	5,318,400	$	-		$	-	$	(80,131	)	$	5,318,400
December 31, 2011:
Municipal bonds	$	(34,768	)	$	2,234,403	$	-		$	-	$	(34,768	)	$	2,234,403
U.S. government and agencies		(8,137	)		1,491,864		-			-		(8,137	)		1,491,864
Subtotal		(42,905	)		3,726,267		-			-		(42,905	)		3,726,267
Mortgage-backed securities
(government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		(18,488	)		4,910,314		(2,068	)		623,455		(20,556	)		5,533,769
Total	$	(61,393	)	$	8,636,581	$	(2,068	)	$	623,455	$	(63,461	)	$	9,260,036

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in municipal bonds, U.S. government and agencies, and mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases.  The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments.  Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

XML

Reconciliation of Income Tax Expense at Statutory Rate to Actual Income Tax Expense (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Computed at the statutory rate (34%)			$ 825,321	$ 772,274
Increase (decrease) resulting from Tax exempt interest
Tax exempt interest			(268,978)	(249,046)
State income taxes, net			141,573	135,251
Increase in cash surrender value			(32,054)	(27,063)
Other, net			(261)	406
Actual tax expense	$ 298,713	$ 368,407	$ 665,601	$ 631,822

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

4.   STOCK–BASED COMPENSATION

In connection with our 2010 second step conversion and related stock offering, the Bank purchased an additional 41,614 shares for its Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees.  The ESOP borrowed funds from the Company in an amount sufficient to purchase the 41,614 shares (approximately 4% of the common stock issued in the offering).  The loan is secured by the shares purchased and will be repaid by the ESOP with funds from contributions made by the Bank and dividends received by the ESOP, with funds from any contributions on ESOP assets.  Contributions will be applied to repay interest on the loan first, and the remainder will be applied to principal.  The loan is expected to be repaid over a period of up to 20 years.  Shares purchased with the loan proceeds are held in a suspense account for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid.  Contributions to the ESOP and shares released from the suspense account are allocated among participants in proportion to their compensation, relative to total compensation of all active participants.  Participants will vest on a pro-rata basis and reach 100% vesting in the accrued benefits under the ESOP after six years.  Vesting is accelerated upon retirement, death, or disability of the participant or a change in control of the Bank.  Forfeitures will be reallocated to remaining plan participants.  Benefits may be payable upon retirement, death, disability, separation from service, or termination of the ESOP.  Since the Bank’s annual contributions are discretionary, benefits payable under the ESOP cannot be estimated.

In the event a terminated ESOP participant desires to sell his or her shares of the Company’s stock, the ESOP includes a put option, which is a right to demand that the Company buy any shares of its stock distributed to participants at fair value.

The Company is accounting for its ESOP in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Employers Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.”  Accordingly, the debt of the ESOP is eliminated in consolidation and the shares pledged as collateral are reported as unearned ESOP shares in the consolidated balance sheet.  Contributions to the ESOP shall be sufficient to pay principal and interest currently due under the loan agreement.  As shares are committed to be released from the collateral, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares for the respective period, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations.  Dividends, if any, on unallocated shares are recorded as a reduction of debt and accrued interest.

A summary of ESOP shares at June 30, 2012 and 2011 is shown below.

	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Unearned shares		34,983		38,495
Shares committed for release		1,079		1,038
Allocated shares		52,815		49,344
Total ESOP shares		88,877		88,877
Fair value of unearned shares	$	591,213	$	481,188

On April 24, 2012, the compensation committee of the board of directors approved the awards of 104,035 options to purchase Company common stock.  The stock options vest over a five-year period and expire ten years after issuance.  Apart from the vesting schedule, there are no performance-based conditions or any other material conditions applicable to the options issued.

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Instrinsic
	Options			Price/Share		Life (in years)		Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2011		4,504		$	13.98
Granted		104,035			15.65
Exercised		(1,201	)		13.98
Forfeited		-			-
Outstanding, June 30, 2012		107,338		$	15.60		9.75	$	139,539
Exercisable, June 30, 2012		3,303		$	13.98		2.00	$	9,645

Intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value and the exercise price.  The value is based upon a closing price of $16.90 per share on June 30, 2012.

The fair value for each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model that uses the following assumptions.  The Company uses the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant to determine the risk-free interest rate.  The expected dividend yield is estimated using the projected annual dividend level and the recent stock price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant.  Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s stock.  The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding.

The weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the year indicated were as follows:

	2012
Risk-free interest rate		1.37	%
Expected dividend yield		2.19	%
Expected stock volatility		33.41	%
Expected life (years)		7.00
Fair value	$	4.34

XML

LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

5.   LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio is shown below.

	June 30, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Amount			Percent			Amount		Percent
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	41,293,201			24.0	%	$	39,472,008		23.1	%
Commercial		37,868,011			22.0			40,169,813		23.5
Agricultural		32,612,241			19.0			29,971,649		17.5
Home equity		14,226,553			8.3			16,042,788		9.4
Total real estate loans		126,000,006			73.2			125,656,258		73.5
Commercial loans		23,953,566			13.9			23,198,454		13.6
Agricultural loans		10,263,526			6.0			9,590,745		5.6
Consumer loans		14,939,089			8.7			15,755,973		9.2
Total loans receivable		175,156,187			101.8			174,201,430		102.0
Less:
Net deferred loan fees		(3,802	)		(0.0	)		39,721		0.0
Allowance for loan losses		3,130,503			1.8			3,296,607		1.9
Total loans receivable, net	$	172,029,486			100.0	%	$	170,865,102		100.0	%

The Company believes that sound loans are a necessary and desirable means of employing funds available for investment.  Recognizing the Company’s obligations to its depositors and to the communities it serves, authorized personnel are expected to seek to develop and make sound, profitable loans that resources permit and that opportunity affords.  The Company maintains lending policies and procedures in place designed to focus lending efforts on the types, locations, and duration of loans most appropriate for the business model and markets.  The Company’s principal lending activities include the origination of one-to four-family residential mortgage loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, agricultural loans, home equity lines of credits, commercial business loans, and consumer loans.  The primary lending market includes the Illinois counties of Morgan, Macoupin and Montgomery.  Generally, loans are collateralized by assets, primarily real estate, of the borrowers and guaranteed by individuals.  The loans are expected to be repaid from cash flows of the borrowers or from proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers.

Loan originations are derived from a number of sources such as real estate broker referrals, existing customers, builders, attorneys and walk-in customers.  Upon receipt of a loan application, a credit report is obtained to verify specific information relating to the applicant’s employment, income, and credit standing.  In the case of a real estate loan, an appraisal of the real estate intended to secure the proposed loan is undertaken by an independent appraiser approved by the Company.  A loan application file is first reviewed by a loan officer in the loan department who checks applications for accuracy and completeness, and verifies the information provided.  The financial resources of the borrower and the borrower’s credit history, as well as the collateral securing the loan, are considered an integral part of each risk evaluation prior to approval.  The board of directors has established individual lending authorities for each loan officer by loan type.  Loans over an individual officer’s lending limits must be approved by the officers’ loan committee consisting of the chairman of the board, president, chief lending officer and all lending officers, which meets three times a week, and has lending authority up to $500,000 depending on the type of loan.  Loans with a principal balance over this limit, up to $1.0 million, must be approved by the directors’ loan committee, which meets weekly and consists of the chairman of the board, president, senior vice president, chief lending officer and at least two outside directors, plus all lending officers as non-voting members.  The board of directors approves all loans with a principal balance over $1.0 million.  The board of directors ratifies all loans that are originated.  Once the loan is approved, the applicant is informed and a closing date is scheduled.  Loan commitments are typically funded within 30 days.

If the loan is approved, the borrower must provide proof of fire and casualty insurance on the property serving as collateral which insurance must be maintained during the full term of the loan; flood insurance is required in certain instances.  Title insurance or an attorney’s opinion based on a title search of the property is generally required on loans secured by real property.

One–to-Four Family Mortgage Loans - Historically, the primary lending origination activity has been one-to-four family, owner-occupied, residential mortgage loans secured by property located in the Company’s market area.  The Company generates loans through marketing efforts, existing customers and referrals, real estate brokers, builders and local businesses.  Generally, one-to-four family loan originations are limited to the financing of loans secured by properties located within the Company’s market area.  

Fixed-rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans are generally conforming loans, underwritten according to Freddie Mac guidelines.  The Company generally originates both fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits established by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for Freddie Mac.

The Company originates for resale to Freddie Mac fixed-rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans with terms of 15 years or more.  The fixed-rate mortgage loans amortize monthly with principal and interest due each month.  Residential real estate loans often remain outstanding for significantly shorter periods than their contractual terms because borrowers may refinance or prepay loans at their option.  The Company offers fixed-rate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years without prepayment penalty.

The Company currently offers adjustable-rate mortgage loans for terms ranging up to 30 years.  They generally offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans that adjust between one and five years on the anniversary date of origination.  Interest rate adjustments are up to two hundred basis points per year, with a cap of up to six hundred basis points on interest rate increases over the life of the loan.  In a rising interest rate environment, such rate limitations may prevent adjustable-rate mortgage loans from repricing to market interest rates, which would have an adverse effect on the net interest income.  In the low interest rate environment that has existed over the past two years, the adjustable-rate portfolio has repriced downward resulting in lower interest income from this portion of the loan portfolio.  The Company has used different interest indices for adjustable-rate mortgage loans in the past such as the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of one year, three years or five years.  The origination of fixed-rate mortgage loans versus adjustable-rate mortgage loans is monitored on an ongoing basis and is affected significantly by the level of market interest rates, customer preference, interest rate risk position and competitors’ loan products.

Adjustable-rate mortgage loans make the loan portfolio more interest rate sensitive and provide an alternative for those borrowers who meet the underwriting criteria, but are unable to qualify for a fixed-rate mortgage.  However, as the interest income earned on adjustable-rate mortgage loans varies with prevailing interest rates, such loans do not offer predictable cash flows in the same manner as long-term, fixed-rate loans.  Adjustable-rate mortgage loans carry increased credit risk associated with potentially higher monthly payments by borrowers as general market interest rates increase.  It is possible that during periods of rising interest rates that the risk of delinquencies and defaults on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest costs to the borrower, resulting in increased loan losses.

Residential first mortgage loans customarily include due-on-sale clauses, which gives the Company the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells or otherwise disposes of the underlying real property serving as collateral for the loan.  Due-on-sale clauses are a means of imposing assumption fees and increasing the interest rate on mortgage portfolio during periods of rising interest rates.

When underwriting residential real estate loans, the Company reviews and verifies each loan applicant’s income and credit history.  Management believes that stability of income and past credit history are integral parts in the underwriting process.  Generally, the applicant’s total monthly mortgage payment, including all escrow amounts, is limited to 28% of the applicant’s total monthly income.  In addition, total monthly obligations of the applicant, including mortgage payments, should not generally exceed 38% of total monthly income.  Written appraisals are generally required on real estate property offered to secure an applicant’s loan.  For one-to-four family real estate loans with loan to value ratios of over 80%, private mortgage insurance is required. Fire and casualty insurance is also required on all properties securing real estate loans.  Title insurance, or an attorney’s title opinion, may be required, as circumstances warrant.

The Company does not offer an “interest only” mortgage loan product on one-to-four family residential properties (where the borrower pays interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan).  They also do not offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option ARM” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan.  The Company does not offer a “subprime loan” program (loans that generally target borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (traditionally defined as loans having less than full documentation).

Commercial Real Estate Loans - The Company originates and purchases commercial real estate loans.  Commercial real estate loans are secured primarily by improved properties such as multi-family residential, retail facilities and office buildings, restaurants and other non-residential buildings.  The maximum loan-to-value ratio for commercial real estate loans originated is generally 80%.  Commercial real estate loans are generally written up to terms of five years with adjustable interest rates.  The rates are generally tied to the prime rate and generally have a specified floor.  Many of the fixed-rate commercial real estate loans are not fully amortizing and therefore require a “balloon” payment at maturity.  The Company purchases from time to time commercial real estate loan participations primarily from outside the Company’s market area. All participation loans are approved following a review to ensure that the loan satisfies the underwriting standards.

Underwriting standards for commercial real estate loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The income approach is primarily utilized to determine whether income generated from the applicant’s business or real estate offered as collateral is adequate to repay the loan.  There is an emphasis on the ratio of the property’s projected net cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%).  In underwriting a loan, the value of the real estate offered as collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount is considered.  Generally, the loan amount cannot be greater than 80% of the value of the real estate.  Written appraisals are usually obtained from either licensed or certified appraisers on all commercial real estate loans in excess of $250,000.  Creditworthiness of the applicant is assessed by reviewing a credit report, financial statements and tax returns of the applicant, as well as obtaining other public records regarding the applicant.

Loans secured by commercial real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and carry larger loan balances.  This increased credit risk is a result of several factors, including the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties and the successful operation or management of the properties securing the loans.  Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related business and real estate property.  If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

Agricultural Real Estate Loans - The Company originates and purchases agricultural real estate loans.  The maximum loan-to-value ratio for agricultural real estate loans we originate is generally 80%. Our agricultural real estate loans are generally written up to terms of five years with adjustable interest rates.  The rates are generally tied to the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of one-year, three-years, or five-years and generally have a specified floor. Many of our fixed-rate agricultural real estate loans are not fully amortizing and therefore require a “balloon” payment at maturity. We purchase from time to time agricultural real estate loan participations primarily from other local institutions within our market area. All participation loans are approved following a review to ensure that the loan satisfies our underwriting standards

Underwriting standards for agricultural real estate include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The income approach is primarily utilized to determine whether income generated from the applicant’s farm operation or real estate offered as collateral is adequate to repay the loan. We emphasize the ratio of the property’s projected cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%).  In underwriting a loan, we consider the value of the real estate offered as collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.  Generally, the loan amount cannot be greater than 80% of the value of the real estate.  We usually obtain written appraisals from either licensed or certified appraisers on all agricultural real estate loans in excess of $250,000.  We assess the creditworthiness of the applicant by reviewing a credit report, financial statements and tax returns of the applicant, as well as obtaining other public records regarding the applicant.

Loans secured by agricultural real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and carry larger loan balances.  This increased credit risk is a result of several factors, including the effects of general economic and market conditions on farm operations and the successful operation or management of the properties securing the loans.  The repayment of loans secured by agricultural estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the farm and real estate property.  If the cash flow is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

Home Equity Loans – The Company originates home equity and lines of credit, which are generally secured by the borrower’s principal residence.  The maximum amount of a home equity loan or line of credit is generally 95% of the appraised value of a borrower’s real estate collateral less the amount of any prior mortgages or related liabilities.  Home equity loans and lines of credit are approved with both fixed and adjustable interest rates which we determine based upon market conditions.  Such loans may be fully amortized over the life of the loan or have a balloon feature.  Generally, the maximum term for home equity loans is 10 years.

Underwriting standards for home equity loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income.  We also consider the length of employment with the borrower’s present employer as well as the amount of time the borrower has lived in the local area.  Creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration; however, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Home equity loans entail greater risks than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, which are secured by first lien mortgages.  In such cases, collateral repossessed after a default may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of damage or depreciation in the value of the property or loss of equity to the first lien position.  Further, home equity loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.  Finally, the application of various Federal and state laws, including Federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans in the event of a default.

Commercial Business Loans - The Company originates commercial business loans to borrowers located in the Company’s market area which are secured by collateral other than real estate or which can be unsecured.  Commercial business loan participations are also purchased from other lenders, which may be made to borrowers outside the Company’s market area.  Commercial business loans are generally secured by equipment and inventory and generally are offered with adjustable rates tied to the prime rate or the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of either one-year, three-years or five-years and various terms of maturity generally from three years to five years.  Unsecured business loans are originated on a limited basis in those instances where the applicant’s financial strength and creditworthiness has been established.  Commercial business loans generally bear higher interest rates than residential loans, but they also may involve a higher risk of default since their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business.  Personal guarantees are generally obtained from the borrower or a third party as a condition to originating its business loans.  

Underwriting standards for commercial and agricultural business loans include a determination of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan from normal cash flows generated in the applicant’s business.  Financial strength of each applicant is assessed through the review of financial statements and tax returns provided by the applicant.  The creditworthiness of an applicant is derived from a review of credit reports as well as a search of public records.  Business loans are periodically reviewed following origination.  Financial statements are requested at least annually and review them for substantial deviations or changes that might affect repayment of the loan.  Loan officers also visit the premises of borrowers to observe the business premises, facilities, and personnel and to inspect the pledged collateral.  Underwriting standards for business loans are different for each type of loan depending on the financial strength of the applicant and the value of collateral offered as security.

Agricultural Business Loans - The Company originates agricultural business loans to borrowers located in our market area which are secured by collateral other than real estate or which can be unsecured. Agricultural business loans are generally secured by equipment and blanket security agreements on all farm assets.  These loans are generally offered with fixed rates with terms up to five years.  Agricultural business loans generally bear lower interest rates than residential loans due to competitive market pressures.  The repayment of agricultural business loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the farm operation.  Personal guarantees are generally obtained from the borrower as a condition to originating agricultural business loans.

Underwriting standards for agricultural business loans include a determination of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan from normal cash flows generated in the applicant’s business.  The financial strength of each applicant is assessed through the review of financial statements, pro-forma cash flow statements, and tax returns provided by the applicant.  The creditworthiness of an applicant is derived from a review of credit reports as well as a search of public records.  Financial statements are requested at least annually and reviewed for substantial deviations or changes that might affect repayment of the loan.  Loan officers may also visit the premises of borrowers to observe the operation, facilities, equipment, and personnel and to inspect the pledged collateral.  Underwriting standards for agricultural business loans are different for each type of loan depending on the financial strength of the applicant and the value of collateral offered as security.

Current drought conditions are expected to reduce 2012 crop yields.  The repayment of agricultural business loans generally is dependent on the successful operation of a farm and can be adversely affected by fluctuations in crop prices, increase in interest rates, and changes in weather conditions.  These developments may result in smaller harvests and less income for farmers which may adversely affect such borrower’s ability to repay a loan, and potentially result in an increase in the level of problem loans and loan losses in our agricultural portfolio.  While not required, the majority of our agricultural business loans are covered by crop insurance, which provides protection against loss due to lower crop yields as a result of drought conditions.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact these conditions may have on its agricultural customers and to the local economy.

Consumer Loans – The Company originates consumer loans, including automobile loans, loans secured by deposit accounts, unsecured loans and mobile home loans.  Consumer loans are generally offered on a fixed-rate basis.  Automobile loans are offered with maturities of up to 60 months for new automobiles.  Loans secured by used automobiles will have maximum terms which vary depending upon the age of the automobile.  Automobile loans are generally originated with a loan-to-value ratio below the greater of 80% of the purchase price or 100% of NADA loan value.  In the case of a new car loan, the loan-to-value ratio may be greater or less depending on the borrower’s credit history, debt to income ratio, home ownership and other banking relationships with us.

Underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s credit history and an assessment of the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.  The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income.  We also consider the length of employment with the borrower’s present employer as well as the amount of time the borrower has lived in the local area.  Creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration; however, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Consumer loans entail greater risks than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, particularly consumer loans secured by rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles or loans that are unsecured.  In such cases, collateral repossessed after a default may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of damage, loss or depreciation.  Further, consumer loan payments are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.  Such events would increase our risk of loss on unsecured loans.  Finally, the application of various Federal and state laws, including Federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans in the event of a default.

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2012, June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate			Home Equity			Commercial		Agricultural			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance, April 1, 2012	$	667,641		$	1,098,838		$	123,105		$	349,467		$	708,016	$	62,562		$	128,927		$	192,355		$	3,330,911
Provision charged to expense		11,488			119,900			(74,187	)		(9,516	)		103,614		(26,528	)		80,192			(34,963	)		170,000
Losses charged off		(70,295	)		(257,043	)		-			(20,000	)		-		-			(50,421	)		-			(397,759	)
Recoveries		20,618			-			-			5,980			-		-			753			-			27,351
Ending balance, June 30, 2012	$	629,452		$	961,695		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	811,630	$	36,034		$	159,451		$	157,392		$	3,130,503
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2012	$	697,223		$	1,107,585		$	115,154		$	309,409		$	711,864	$	58,428		$	138,385		$	158,559		$	3,296,607
Provision charged to expense		(19,719	)		111,153			(66,236	)		76,761			99,450		(22,394	)		72,152			(1,167	)		250,000
Losses charged off		(70,295	)		(257,043	)		-			(66,744	)		-		-			(53,385	)		-			(447,467	)
Recoveries		22,243			-			-			6,505			316		-			2,299			-			31,363
Ending balance, June 30, 2012	$	629,452		$	961,695		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	811,630	$	36,034		$	159,451		$	157,392		$	3,130,503
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	-		$	137,608		$	-		$	-		$	515,688	$	-		$	7,359		$	-		$	660,655
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	629,452		$	824,087		$	48,918		$	325,931		$	295,942	$	36,034		$	152,092		$	157,392		$	2,469,848
Loans:
Ending balance	$	41,293,201		$	37,868,011		$	32,612,241		$	14,226,553		$	23,953,566	$	10,263,526		$	14,939,089		$	-		$	175,156,187
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	286,800		$	1,389,183		$	-		$	58,090		$	752,809	$	-		$	7,359		$	-		$	2,494,241
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	41,006,401		$	36,478,828		$	32,612,241		$	14,168,463		$	23,200,757	$	10,263,526		$	14,931,730		$	-		$	172,661,946

	June 30, 2011
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate		Home Equity			Commercial			Agricultural		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance, April 1, 2011	$	514,330		$	1,093,553		$	104,867	$	267,660		$	506,317		$	141,044	$	121,873		$	129,606	$	2,879,250
Provision charged to expense		72,461			50,535			7,341		8,713			(52,393	)		11,375		4,490			47,478		150,000
Losses charged off		(24,809	)		-			-		-			-			-		-			-		(24,809	)
Recoveries		-			700			-		1,275			153,609			-		801			-		156,385
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	561,982		$	1,144,788		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	607,533		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	3,160,826
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2011	$	561,309		$	1,193,928		$	92,988	$	300,257		$	472,376		$	58,250	$	163,690		$	121,487	$	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense		32,884			202,803			19,220		(23,589	)		(18,652	)		94,169		(37,432	)		55,597		325,000
Losses charged off		(32,211	)		(260,785	)		-		(4,162	)		-			-		(1,097	)		-		(298,255	)
Recoveries		-			8,842			-		5,142			153,809			-		2,003			-		169,796
Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	561,982		$	1,144,788		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	607,533		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	3,160,826
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	89,795		$	314,285		$	-	$	-		$	227,698		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	631,778
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	472,187		$	830,503		$	112,208	$	277,648		$	379,835		$	152,419	$	127,164		$	177,084	$	2,529,048
Loans:
Ending balance	$	38,208,843		$	43,011,180		$	31,632,558	$	17,939,927		$	22,430,621		$	8,503,056	$	16,194,069		$	-	$	177,920,254
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	639,589		$	1,754,057		$	-	$	-		$	570,677		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	2,964,323
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	37,569,254		$	41,257,123		$	31,632,558	$	17,939,927		$	21,859,944		$	8,503,056	$	16,194,069		$	-	$	174,955,931

	December 31, 2011
	1-4 Family			Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural Real Estate		Home Equity			Commercial		Agricultural		Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance, beginning of year	$	561,309		$	1,193,928		$	92,988	$	300,257		$	472,376	$	58,250	$	163,690		$	121,487	$	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense		266,296			195,118			22,166		26,863			83,654		178		(6,347	)		37,072		625,000
Losses charged off		(130,382	)		(306,303	)		-		(24,904	)		-		-		(25,289	)		-		(486,878	)
Recoveries		-			24,842			-		7,193			155,834		-		6,331			-		194,200
Balance, end of year	$	697,223		$	1,107,585		$	115,154	$	309,409		$	711,864	$	58,428	$	138,385		$	158,559	$	3,296,607
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	36,300		$	357,880		$	-	$	-		$	296,149	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	690,329
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	660,923		$	749,705		$	115,154	$	309,409		$	415,715	$	58,428	$	138,385		$	158,559	$	2,606,278
Loans:
Ending balance	$	39,472,008		$	40,169,813		$	29,971,649	$	16,042,788		$	23,198,454	$	9,590,745	$	15,755,973		$	-	$	174,201,430
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	551,921		$	1,727,406		$	-	$	29,353		$	552,814	$	-	$	7,569		$	-	$	2,869,063
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	38,920,087		$	38,442,407		$	29,971,649	$	16,013,435		$	22,645,640	$	9,590,745	$	15,748,404		$	-	$	171,332,367

Management’s opinion as to the ultimate collectability of loans is subject to estimates regarding future cash flows from operations and the value of property, real and personal, pledged as collateral.  These estimates are affected by changing economic conditions and the economic prospects of borrowers.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date.  The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings.  Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed.  Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions.  This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of allocated and general components.  The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired.  For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the scheduled payments of principal or interest will not be able to be collected when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the group’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans.  Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment measurements, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.

The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given the internal risk rating process.  The loan portfolio is stratified into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss characteristics and an appropriate loss ratio adjusted for other qualitative factors is applied to the homogeneous pools of loans to estimate the incurred losses in the loan portfolio.  

There have been no changes to the Company’s accounting policies or methodology from the prior periods.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends among other factors.  The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk.  This analysis is performed on all loans at origination.  In addition, lending relationships over $500,000, new commercial and commercial real estate loans, and watch list credits are reviewed annually by our loan review department in order to verify risk ratings.  The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention.  If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt.  They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be Pass rated loans.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the Company’s loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	1-4 Family				Commercial Real Estate				Agricultural Real Estate				Home Equity
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Rating:
Pass	$	38,761,356	$	36,040,795	$	34,980,711	$	36,936,906	$	32,612,241	$	29,567,057	$	13,095,024	$	14,746,631
Special Mention		1,221,466		1,642,602		582,523		574,484		-		404,592		169,610		278,323
Substandard		1,310,379		1,788,611		2,304,777		2,658,423		-		-		961,919		1,017,834
Total	$	41,293,201	$	39,472,008	$	37,868,011	$	40,169,813	$	32,612,241	$	29,971,649	$	14,226,553	$	16,042,788
	Commercial				Agricultural				Consumer				Total
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Rating:
Pass	$	23,019,375	$	22,253,904	$	10,158,226	$	9,336,899	$	14,725,790	$	15,409,729	$	167,352,723	$	164,291,921
Special Mention		18,485		3,402		105,300		253,846		74,075		153,316		2,171,459		3,310,565
Substandard		915,706		941,148		-		-		139,224		192,928		5,632,005		6,598,944
Total	$	23,953,566	$	23,198,454	$	10,263,526	$	9,590,745	$	14,939,089	$	15,755,973	$	175,156,187	$	174,201,430

The following tables present the Company’s loan portfolio aging analysis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90		Total						Total Loans >90
	Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Days & Accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	496,878	$	100,178	$	264,707	$	861,763	$	40,431,438	$	41,293,201	$	-
Commercial real estate		91,177		-		46,778		137,955		37,730,056		37,868,011		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-		32,612,241		32,612,241		-
Home equity		145,859				452,108		597,967		13,628,586		14,226,553		-
Commercial		-		-		16,576		16,576		23,936,990		23,953,566		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		10,263,526		10,263,526		-
Consumer		154,184		6,950		15,177		176,311		14,762,778		14,939,089		-
Total	$	888,098	$	107,128	$	795,346	$	1,790,572	$	173,365,615	$	175,156,187	$	-

	December 31, 2011
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90		Total						Total Loans >90
	Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Days & Accruing
One-to-four family residential	$	289,337	$	161,654	$	1,020,862	$	1,471,853	$	38,000,155	$	39,472,008	$	-
Commercial real estate		75,924		-		48,428		124,352		40,045,461		40,169,813		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-		29,971,649		29,971,649		-
Home equity		511,562		50,455		197,191		759,208		15,283,580		16,042,788		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		23,198,454		23,198,454		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		9,590,745		9,590,745		-
Consumer		156,404		126,077		37,337		319,818		15,436,155		15,755,973		-
Total	$	1,033,227	$	338,186	$	1,303,818	$	2,675,231	$	171,526,199	$	174,201,430	$	-

The accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection.  Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan.  In all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged-off at the earlier date if collection of principal and interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged-off are reversed against interest income.  The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual.  Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

           A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan.  Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.

Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of the expected future cash flows, the loan’s observable market value, or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses.  Significant restructured loans are considered impaired in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

The Company actively seeks to reduce its investment in impaired loans.  The primary tools to work through impaired loans are settlement with the borrowers or guarantors, foreclosure of the underlying collateral, or restructuring.

The Company will restructure loans when the borrower demonstrates the inability to comply with the terms of the loan, but can demonstrate the ability to meet acceptable restructured terms.  Restructurings generally include one or more of the following restructuring options; reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.  Restructured loans in compliance with modified terms are classified as impaired.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	286,800	$	286,800	$	-	$	287,253	$	4,238	$	4,427
Commercial real estate		293,163		293,163		-		298,241		14,445		14,546
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		72,018		1,556		1,619
Loans with a specific allowance:
Commercial real estate		1,096,020		1,096,020		137,608		1,144,327		10,365		9,385
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		786,002		15,369		23,374
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,491		145		200
Total:
One-to-four family residential		286,800		286,800		-		287,253		4,238		4,427
Commercial real estate		1,389,183		1,389,183		137,608		1,442,568		24,810		23,931
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		786,002		15,369		23,374
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		72,018		1,556		1,619
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,491		145		200
Total	$	2,494,241	$	2,494,241	$	660,655	$	2,595,332	$	46,118	$	53,551

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	286,800	$	286,800	$	-	$	287,387	$	6,694	$	6,714
Commercial real estate		293,163		293,163		-		310,295		15,298		15,462
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		70,889		2,287		2,368
Loans with a specific allowance:
Commercial real estate		1,096,020		1,096,020		137,608		1,146,774		34,593		34,675
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		791,202		24,434		32,485
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,530		313		300
Total:
One-to-four family residential		286,800		286,800		-		287,387		6,694		6,714
Commercial real estate		1,389,183		1,389,183		137,608		1,457,069		49,891		50,137
Commercial		752,809		752,809		515,688		791,202		24,434		32,485
Home equity		58,090		58,090		-		70,889		2,287		2,368
Consumer		7,359		7,359		7,359		7,530		313		300
Total	$	2,494,241	$	2,494,241	$	660,655	$	2,614,077	$	83,619	$	92,004

	December 31, 2011
							Average				Interest
			Unpaid				Impairment in		Interest		Income
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		Impaired		Income		Recognized
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized		Cash Basis
Loans without a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential	$	235,856	$	235,856	$	-	$	249,103	$	10,446	$	11,162
Commercial real estate		69,249		69,249		-		71,972		457		254
Home equity		29,353		29,353		-		21,954		1,933		1,605
Loans with a specific allowance:
One-to-four family residential		316,065		316,065		36,300		368,040		25,241		18,341
Commercial real estate		1,658,157		1,658,157		357,880		1,726,905		88,084		117,289
Commercial		552,814		552,814		296,149		592,796		37,192		36,628
Consumer		7,569		7,569		-		7,569		37		-
Total:
One-to-four family residential		551,921		551,921		36,300		617,143		35,687		29,503
Commercial real estate		1,727,406		1,727,406		357,880		1,798,877		88,541		117,543
Commercial		552,814		552,814		296,149		592,796		37,192		36,628
Home equity		7,569		7,569		-		7,569		37		-
Consumer		29,353		29,353		-		21,954		1,933		1,605
Total	$	2,869,063	$	2,869,063	$	690,329	$	3,038,339	$	163,390	$	185,279

Included in certain loan categories in the impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties, that were classified as impaired.   These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  TDR’s are considered impaired at the time of restructuring and typically are returned to accrual status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period of at least six months.

When loans are modified into a TDR, the Company evaluates any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or based upon on the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans.  If the Company determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.  In periods subsequent to modification, the Company evaluates all TDR’s, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognizes impairment through the allowance.

The following table presents the recorded balance, at original cost, of TDR’s, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	245,211	$	213,966
Commercial real estate		1,030,405		1,075,483
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		111,349		125,588
Commercial loans		725,714		477,798
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		96,155		83,962
Total	$	2,208,834	$	1,976,797

The following table presents the recorded balance, at original cost, of TDR’s, which were performing according to the terms of the restructuring, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	245,211	$	131,990
Commercial real estate		1,002,405		1,007,723
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		101,530		95,769
Commercial loans		725,714		477,798
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		21,623		83,962
Total	$	2,096,483	$	1,797,242

The following table presents loans modified as TDR’s during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012				June 30, 2012
	Number of		Recorded		Number of		Recorded
	Modifications		Investment		Modifications		Investment
One-to-four family residential		-	$	-		1	$	44,267
Commercial real estate		-		-		-		-
Agricultural real estate		-		-		-		-
Home equity		-		-		1		6,041
Commercial loans		2		269,909		2		269,909
Agricultural loans		-		-		-		-
Consumer loans		2		18,818		2		18,818
Total		4	$	288,727		6	$	339,035

During the six month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company modified one one-to-four family residential real estate loan, with a recorded investment of $44,267, which was deemed to be a TDR.  The modification was made to change the payment schedule to interest-only for a period of time.  The modification did not result in a reduction of the contractual interest rate or a write-off of the principal balance.

The Company also modified one home equity loan with a recorded investment of $6,041.  The modification was made to change the payment schedule to interest-only for a period of time.  The modification did not result in a reduction of the contractual interest rate or a write-off of the principal balance.

The Company also modified two commercial loans with a total recorded investment of $269,909.  Both modifications were made to reduce the contractual interest rate and payment amount.  Neither modification resulted in a write-off of the principal balance.

The Company also modified two consumer loans with a total recorded investment of $18,818.  Both modifications were made to extend the term of the loans to lower the payment amount.  Neither modification resulted in a reduction of the contractual interest rate or a write-off of the principal balance.

Management considers the level of defaults within the various portfolios when evaluating qualitative adjustments used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  During the six month period ended June 30, 2012, one commercial real estate loan of $28,000, and one home equity loan of $9,819 that were considered TDR’s defaulted as they were more than 90 days past due at June 30, 2012.  Default occurs when a loan is 90 days or more past due, transferred to nonaccrual or charged-off, and is within twelve months of restructuring.

The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  This table excludes performing troubled debt restructurings.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
One-to-four family residential	$	636,919	$	1,297,953
Commercial real estate		632,877		361,524
Agricultural real estate		-		-
Home equity		668,595		423,113
Commercial loans		75,147		66,852
Agricultural loans		-		-
Consumer loans		106,729		251,025
Total	$	2,120,267	$	2,400,467

XML

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

7. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Other comprehensive income components and related taxes were as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	1,267,807	$	2,107,173	$	1,423,825	$	2,606,636
Less reclassification adjustment for realized gains
included in income		301,580		55,713		526,908		109,218
Other comprehensive income before tax effect		966,227		2,051,460		896,917		2,497,418
Less tax expense		328,517		697,496		304,952		849,122
Other comprehensive income	$	637,710	$	1,353,964	$	591,965	$	1,648,296

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, included in stockholders’ equity, are as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	4,946,144		$	4,049,227
Tax effect		(1,681,689	)		(1,376,737	)
Net-of-tax amount	$	3,264,455		$	2,672,490

XML

Stock Option Activity (Detail) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Stock options
Outstanding, beginning balance	4,504
Granted	104,035
Exercised	(1,201)
Forfeited
Outstanding, ending balance	107,338
Exercisable, ending balance	3,303
Weighted Average Exercise price\Share
Outstanding, beginning balance	$ 13.98
Granted	$ 15.65
Exercised	$ 13.98
Forfeited
Outstanding, Ending balance	$ 15.60
Exercisable, Ending balance	$ 13.98
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
Outstanding, Ending balance	9 years 274 days
Exercisable, Ending balance	2 years
Aggregate Instrinsic Value
Outstanding, Aggregate Instrinsic Value	$ 139,539
Exercisable, Aggregate Instrinsic Value	$ 9,645

XML

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$ 4,946,144	$ 4,049,227
Tax effect	(1,681,689)	(1,376,737)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$ 3,264,455	$ 2,672,490

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers in the way of commitments to extend credit.  Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.  Substantially all of the Company’s loans are to borrowers located in Cass, Morgan, Macoupin, Montgomery, and surrounding counties in Illinois.

XML

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Other Comprehensive Income Components and Related Taxes

Other comprehensive income components and related taxes were as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	1,267,807	$	2,107,173	$	1,423,825	$	2,606,636
Less reclassification adjustment for realized gains
included in income		301,580		55,713		526,908		109,218
Other comprehensive income before tax effect		966,227		2,051,460		896,917		2,497,418
Less tax expense		328,517		697,496		304,952		849,122
Other comprehensive income	$	637,710	$	1,353,964	$	591,965	$	1,648,296

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, included in stockholders’ equity, are as follows:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	4,946,144		$	4,049,227
Tax effect		(1,681,689	)		(1,376,737	)
Net-of-tax amount	$	3,264,455		$	2,672,490

XML

Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value in Continuous Loss Position (Detail) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Investments, Unrealized Loss Position [Line Items]
Less Than Twelve Months, Gross Unrealized Losses		$ (61,393)
Less Than Twelve Months, Fair Value		8,636,581
Twelve Months or More, Gross Unrealized Losses		(2,068)
Twelve Months or More, Fair Value		623,455
Gross Unrealized Losses		(63,461)
Fair Value		9,260,036
Unsecured Debt
Investments, Unrealized Loss Position [Line Items]
Less Than Twelve Months, Gross Unrealized Losses	(80,131)	(42,905)
Less Than Twelve Months, Fair Value	5,318,400	3,726,267
Gross Unrealized Losses	(80,131)	(42,905)
Fair Value	5,318,400	3,726,267
Municipal bonds | Unsecured Debt
Investments, Unrealized Loss Position [Line Items]
Less Than Twelve Months, Gross Unrealized Losses	(79,663)	(34,768)
Less Than Twelve Months, Fair Value	4,818,867	2,234,403
Gross Unrealized Losses	(79,663)	(34,768)
Fair Value	4,818,867	2,234,403
U.S. government and agencies | Unsecured Debt
Investments, Unrealized Loss Position [Line Items]
Less Than Twelve Months, Gross Unrealized Losses	(468)	(8,137)
Less Than Twelve Months, Fair Value	499,533	1,491,864
Gross Unrealized Losses	(468)	(8,137)
Fair Value	499,533	1,491,864
Mortgage-backed securities (government-sponsored enterprises - residential)
Investments, Unrealized Loss Position [Line Items]
Less Than Twelve Months, Gross Unrealized Losses		(18,488)
Less Than Twelve Months, Fair Value		4,910,314
Twelve Months or More, Gross Unrealized Losses		(2,068)
Twelve Months or More, Fair Value		623,455
Gross Unrealized Losses		(20,556)
Fair Value		$ 5,533,769

XML

Impaired Loans (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Recorded Balance, Total	$ 2,494,241	$ 2,494,241	$ 2,869,063
Unpaid Principal Balance, Total	2,494,241	2,494,241	2,869,063
Specific Allowance, Total	660,655	660,655	690,329
Average Impairment in Impaired Loans, Total	2,595,332	2,614,077	3,038,339
Interest Income Recognized, Total	46,118	83,619	163,390
Interest Income Recognized, Cash Basis, Total	53,551	92,004	185,279
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance	286,800	286,800	235,856
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance	286,800	286,800	235,856
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans	287,253	287,387	249,103
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized	4,238	6,694	10,446
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis	4,427	6,714	11,162
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance			316,065
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance			316,065
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance			36,300
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans			368,040
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized			25,241
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash basis			18,341
Recorded Balance, Total	286,800	286,800	551,921
Unpaid Principal Balance, Total	286,800	286,800	551,921
Specific Allowance, Total			36,300
Average Impairment in Impaired Loans, Total	287,253	287,387	617,143
Interest Income Recognized, Total	4,238	6,694	35,687
Interest Income Recognized, Cash Basis, Total	4,427	6,714	29,503
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance	293,163	293,163	69,249
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance	293,163	293,163	69,249
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans	298,241	310,295	71,972
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized	14,445	15,298	457
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis	14,546	15,462	254
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance	1,096,020	1,096,020	1,658,157
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance	1,096,020	1,096,020	1,658,157
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance	137,608	137,608	357,880
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans	1,144,327	1,146,774	1,726,905
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized	10,365	34,593	88,084
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash basis	9,385	34,675	117,289
Recorded Balance, Total	1,389,183	1,389,183	1,727,406
Unpaid Principal Balance, Total	1,389,183	1,389,183	1,727,406
Specific Allowance, Total	137,608	137,608	357,880
Average Impairment in Impaired Loans, Total	1,442,568	1,457,069	1,798,877
Interest Income Recognized, Total	24,810	49,891	88,541
Interest Income Recognized, Cash Basis, Total	23,931	50,137	117,543
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance	58,090	58,090	29,353
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance	58,090	58,090	29,353
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans	72,018	70,889	21,954
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized	1,556	2,287	1,933
Loans without a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash Basis	1,619	2,368	1,605
Recorded Balance, Total	58,090	58,090	7,569
Unpaid Principal Balance, Total	58,090	58,090	7,569
Average Impairment in Impaired Loans, Total	72,018	70,889	7,569
Interest Income Recognized, Total	1,556	2,287	37
Interest Income Recognized, Cash Basis, Total	1,619	2,368
Commercial business
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance	752,809	752,809	552,814
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance	752,809	752,809	552,814
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance	515,688	515,688	296,149
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans	786,002	791,202	592,796
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized	15,369	24,434	37,192
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash basis	23,374	32,485	36,628
Recorded Balance, Total	752,809	752,809	552,814
Unpaid Principal Balance, Total	752,809	752,809	552,814
Specific Allowance, Total	515,688	515,688	296,149
Average Impairment in Impaired Loans, Total	786,002	791,202	592,796
Interest Income Recognized, Total	15,369	24,434	37,192
Interest Income Recognized, Cash Basis, Total	23,374	32,485	36,628
Consumer loan
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Recorded Balance	7,359	7,359	7,569
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Unpaid Principal Balance	7,359	7,359	7,569
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Specific Allowance	7,359	7,359
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Average Impairment in Impaired Loans	7,491	7,530	7,569
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized	145	313	37
Loans with a specific valuation allowance, Interest Income Recognized Cash basis	200	300
Recorded Balance, Total	7,359	7,359	29,353
Unpaid Principal Balance, Total	7,359	7,359	29,353
Specific Allowance, Total	7,359	7,359
Average Impairment in Impaired Loans, Total	7,491	7,530	21,954
Interest Income Recognized, Total	145	313	1,933
Interest Income Recognized, Cash Basis, Total	$ 200	$ 300	$ 1,605

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Net Income	$ 847,063	$ 904,834	$ 1,761,813	$ 1,639,573
Other Comprehensive Income
Unrealized appreciation on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $431,054 and $716,438 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $484,101 and $886,256 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.	836,753	1,390,735	939,724	1,720,380
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income, net of taxes of $102,537 and $18,942, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $179,149 and $37,134 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.	199,043	36,771	347,759	72,084
Other comprehensive income	637,710	1,353,964	591,965	1,648,296
Comprehensive Income	$ 1,484,773	$ 2,258,798	$ 2,353,778	$ 3,287,869

XML

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jacksonville Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Financial Resources Group, Inc. collectively (the “Company”).  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

In the opinion of management, the preceding unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and the results of its operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.  The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed in March, 2012.  The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and to prevailing practices within the industry.

Certain amounts included in the 2011 consolidated statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation.

XML

Activity in Balance of Mortgage Servicing Rights Measured using Amortization Method (Detail) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Servicing Assets at Amortized Value [Line Items]
Balance, beginning of year	$ 697,733	$ 797,327
Servicing rights capitalized	96,131	137,206
Amortization of servicing rights	(150,425)	(226,998)
Change in valuation allowance	24,808	(9,802)
Balance, end of period	$ 668,247	$ 697,733

XML

DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value Measurements of Assets Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets  recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			June 30,2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. Government and
agencies	$	9,781,113	$	-	$	9,781,113	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities
(Government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		48,917,896		-		48,917,896		-
Municipal bonds		51,934,571		-		51,934,571		-

			December 31, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. Government and
agencies	$	14,335,643	$	-	$	14,335,643	$	-
Mortgage-backed securities
(Government sponsored
enterprises - residential)		40,364,086		-		40,364,086		-
Municipal bonds		47,922,319		-		47,922,319		-

Fair Value Measurement of Assets Measured at Fair Value on Nonrecurring Basis

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

			June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets  for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans
(collateral dependent)	$	574,672	$	-	$	-	$	574,672
Real estate owned		291,983		-		-		291,983

			December 31, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Impaired loans
(collateral dependent)	$	867,318	$	-	$	-	$	867,318
Mortgage servicing rights		697,733						697,733
Real estate owned		435,480		-		-		435,480

Quantitative Information About Unobservable Inputs Used in Recurring and Nonrecurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements (dollars in thousands).

	Fair Value at 6/30/12		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)
Real estate owned	$	291,983	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments (%)	Not available
Collateral-dependent impaired loans		574,672	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount	20% – 30% (25%)

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s other financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	June 30, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices		Significant
			in Active		Other		Significant
			Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,298,031	$	9,298,031	$	-	$	-
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,972,000		-		2,972,000		-
Other investments		106,038		-		106,038		-
Loans held for sale		674,052		-		674,052		-
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		172,029,486		-		-		170,878,318
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800		-		1,113,800		-
Interest receivable		2,083,481		-		2,083,481		-
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		261,552,747		-		127,993,795		136,711,695
Short-term borrowings		6,109,700		-		6,109,700		-
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		952,129		-		952,129		-
Interest payable		323,926		-		323,926		-
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans		-		-		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-		-		-
Lines of credit		-		-		-		-

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,387,947	$	11,387,947
Interest earning time deposits in banks		2,476,000		2,476,000
Other investments		116,088		116,088
Loans held for sale		446,818		446,818
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		170,865,102		169,667,091
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,113,800		1,113,800
Interest receivable		2,071,534		2,071,534
Financial Liabilities
Deposits		254,240,060		265,515,126
Short-term borrowings		6,517,750		6,517,750
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		740,083		740,083
Interest payable		349,121		349,121
Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contract amount)
Commitments to originate loans		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-
Lines of credit		-		-

XML

Balance in Allowances for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans Based on Portfolio Segment and Impairment Method (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	$ 175,156,187	$ 177,920,254	$ 175,156,187	$ 177,920,254	$ 174,201,430
Loans, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	2,494,241	2,964,323	2,494,241	2,964,323	2,869,063
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	172,661,946	174,955,931	172,661,946	174,955,931	171,332,367
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	3,330,911	2,879,250	3,296,607	2,964,285	2,964,285
Provision charged to expense	170,000	150,000	250,000	325,000	625,000
Losses charged off	(397,759)	(24,809)	(447,467)	(298,255)	(486,878)
Recoveries	27,351	156,385	31,363	169,796	194,200
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	3,130,503	3,160,826	3,130,503	3,160,826	3,296,607
Allowance for loan losses, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	660,655	631,778	660,655	631,778	690,329
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	2,469,848	2,529,048	2,469,848	2,529,048	2,606,278
Home equity
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553	17,939,927	14,226,553	17,939,927	16,042,788
Loans, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	58,090		58,090		29,353
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	14,168,463	17,939,927	14,168,463	17,939,927	16,013,435
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	349,467	267,660	309,409	300,257	300,257
Provision charged to expense	(9,516)	8,713	76,761	(23,589)	26,863
Losses charged off	(20,000)		(66,744)	(4,162)	(24,904)
Recoveries	5,980	1,275	6,505	5,142	7,193
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	325,931	277,648	325,931	277,648	309,409
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	325,931	277,648	325,931	277,648	309,409
Mortgage loans on real estate
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	126,000,006		126,000,006		125,656,258
Mortgage loans on real estate | One-to-four family residential
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	41,293,201	38,208,843	41,293,201	38,208,843	39,472,008
Loans, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	286,800	639,589	286,800	639,589	551,921
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	41,006,401	37,569,254	41,006,401	37,569,254	38,920,087
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	667,641	514,330	697,223	561,309	561,309
Provision charged to expense	11,488	72,461	(19,719)	32,884	266,296
Losses charged off	(70,295)	(24,809)	(70,295)	(32,211)	(130,382)
Recoveries	20,618		22,243
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	629,452	561,982	629,452	561,982	697,223
Allowance for loan losses, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance		89,795		89,795	36,300
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	629,452	472,187	629,452	472,187	660,923
Mortgage loans on real estate | Commercial
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	37,868,011	43,011,180	37,868,011	43,011,180	40,169,813
Loans, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	1,389,183	1,754,057	1,389,183	1,754,057	1,727,406
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	36,478,828	41,257,123	36,478,828	41,257,123	38,442,407
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	1,098,838	1,093,553	1,107,585	1,193,928	1,193,928
Provision charged to expense	119,900	50,535	111,153	202,803	195,118
Losses charged off	(257,043)		(257,043)	(260,785)	(306,303)
Recoveries		700		8,842	24,842
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	961,695	1,144,788	961,695	1,144,788	1,107,585
Allowance for loan losses, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	137,608	314,285	137,608	314,285	357,880
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	824,087	830,503	824,087	830,503	749,705
Mortgage loans on real estate | Agricultural
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	32,612,241	31,632,558	32,612,241	31,632,558	29,971,649
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	32,612,241	31,632,558	32,612,241	31,632,558	29,971,649
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	123,105	104,867	115,154	92,988	92,988
Provision charged to expense	(74,187)	7,341	(66,236)	19,220	22,166
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	48,918	112,208	48,918	112,208	115,154
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	48,918	112,208	48,918	112,208	115,154
Mortgage loans on real estate | Home equity
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	14,226,553		14,226,553		16,042,788
Commercial business
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	23,953,566	22,430,621	23,953,566	22,430,621	23,198,454
Loans, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	752,809	570,677	752,809	570,677	552,814
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	23,200,757	21,859,944	23,200,757	21,859,944	22,645,640
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	708,016	506,317	711,864	472,376	472,376
Provision charged to expense	103,614	(52,393)	99,450	(18,652)	83,654
Recoveries		153,609	316	153,809	155,834
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	811,630	607,533	811,630	607,533	711,864
Allowance for loan losses, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	515,688	227,698	515,688	227,698	296,149
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	295,942	379,835	295,942	379,835	415,715
Agricultural business
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	10,263,526	8,503,056	10,263,526	8,503,056	9,590,745
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	10,263,526	8,503,056	10,263,526	8,503,056	9,590,745
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	62,562	141,044	58,428	58,250	58,250
Provision charged to expense	(26,528)	11,375	(22,394)	94,169	178
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	36,034	152,419	36,034	152,419	58,428
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	36,034	152,419	36,034	152,419	58,428
Consumer loan
Loans:
Loans receivable gross	14,939,089	16,194,069	14,939,089	16,194,069	15,755,973
Loans, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	7,359		7,359		7,569
Loans, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	14,931,730	16,194,069	14,931,730	16,194,069	15,748,404
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	128,927	121,873	138,385	163,690	163,690
Provision charged to expense	80,192	4,490	72,152	(37,432)	(6,347)
Losses charged off	(50,421)		(53,385)	(1,097)	(25,289)
Recoveries	753	801	2,299	2,003	6,331
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	159,451	127,164	159,451	127,164	138,385
Allowance for loan losses, individually evaluated for impairment, ending balance	7,359		7,359
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	152,092	127,164	152,092	127,164	138,385
Unallocated
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance	192,355	129,606	158,559	121,487	121,487
Provision charged to expense	(34,963)	47,478	(1,167)	55,597	37,072
Allowance for loan losses, ending balance	157,392	177,084	157,392	177,084	158,559
Allowance for loan losses, collectively evaluated for impairment, ending balance	$ 157,392	$ 177,084	$ 157,392	$ 177,084	$ 158,559

XML

INCOME TAXES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

INCOME TAXES

11. INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is shown below.

	June 30, 2012			June 30, 2011
Computed at the statutory rate (34%)	$	825,321		$	772,274
Increase (decrease) resulting from Tax exempt interest		(268,978	)		(249,046	)
State income taxes, net		141,573			135,251
Increase in cash surrender value		(32,054	)		(27,063	)
Other, net		(261	)		406
Actual tax expense	$	665,601		$	631,822