XML 36 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable (included in other assets), accounts payable and accrued liabilities: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for these instruments approximate their fair value due to the short term nature of these accounts.

Junior subordinated notes: At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, the estimated fair value of the notes is lower than their carrying value by approximately $15,939,000 and $16,549,000 based on a market interest rate of 6.76% and 6.37%, respectively.

Mortgages payable: At June 30, 2017, the estimated fair value of the Company’s mortgages payable is lower than their carrying value by approximately $11,880,000 assuming market interest rates between 3.78% and 5.02% and at September 30, 2016, the estimated fair value of the Company's mortgages payable was greater than their carrying value by approximately $10,629,000 assuming market interest rates between 3.05% and 4.25%. Market interest rates were determined using rates which the Company believes reflects institutional lender yield requirements at the balance sheet dates.

Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value assumptions.

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The Company’s fair value measurements are based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, there is a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions. Level 1 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets, Level 2 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, on quoted prices in less active or inactive markets, or on other “observable” market inputs, and Level 3 assets/liabilities are valued based significantly on “unobservable” market inputs. The Company does not currently own any financial instruments that are classified as Level 3. Set forth below is information regarding the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):



Carrying and Fair Value
 
Fair Value Measurements
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
$
1,489

 

 
$
1,489

 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$
17

 

 
$
17



Derivative financial instruments: Fair values are approximated using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. At June 30, 2017, these derivatives are included in other assets and other accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with them utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. As of June 30, 2017, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative position and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivatives valuation is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.