UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 001-35655

CAPITAL BANK FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	27-1454759
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

121 Alhambra Plaza Suite 1601 Coral Gables, Florida 33134

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(305) 670-0200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Class A Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value	32,432,736
Class B Non-Voting Common, $0.01 Par Value	19,681,637
Class	Outstanding as of October 31, 2013

CAPITAL BANK FINANCIAL CORP.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2013

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	1
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	48
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	85
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	86
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	86
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	86
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	86
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	87
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	87
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	87
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	87

2

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	115,671		$	142,361
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		48,033			592,375
Federal funds sold		—			138
Total cash and cash equivalents		163,704			734,874
Trading securities		6,091			—
Investment securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost $718,400 and $991,566 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)		717,602			1,006,744
Investment securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value $483,413 and $0 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively)		482,986			—
Loans held for sale		8,918			11,276
Loans, net of deferred loan costs and fees		4,468,362			4,724,214
Less: allowance for loan losses		56,393			57,262
Loans, net		4,411,969			4,666,952
Other real estate owned		129,654			154,093
Receivable from FDIC		8,439			8,486
Indemnification asset		36,837			49,417
Premises and equipment, net		183,498			198,457
Goodwill		131,987			131,987
Intangible assets, net		24,681			28,636
Deferred income tax asset, net		177,928			183,157
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		117,017			132,874
Total assets	$	6,601,311		$	7,306,953
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	937,152		$	895,274
Time deposits		1,579,772			2,070,698
Money market		938,854			1,125,967
Savings		531,655			492,187
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		1,281,036			1,288,742
Total deposits		5,268,469			5,872,868
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,324			1,460
Short-term borrowings		23,224			41,508
Long-term borrowings		138,290			180,430
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		62,179			55,344
Total liabilities		5,493,486			6,151,610
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock $0.01 par value: 50,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued		—			—
Common stock-Class A $0.01 par value: 200,000 shares authorized; 36,177 issued and 32,738 outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and 33,025 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012.		361			330
Common stock-Class B $0.01 par value: 200,000 shares authorized, 19,681 and 22,821 issued and outstanding, respectively		197			228
Additional paid in capital		1,081,108			1,076,797
Retained earnings		95,279			68,641
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(6,236	)		9,347
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,439 shares		(62,884	)		—
Total shareholders’ equity		1,107,825			1,155,343
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,601,311		$	7,306,953

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Three Months  Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months  Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months  Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months  Ended September 30, 2012
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees	$	67,355		$	64,866		$	207,327		$	199,476
Investment securities:
Taxable interest income		4,383			3,738			11,925			14,516
Tax-exempt interest income		158			175			484			663
Dividends		14			18			44			49
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		37			181			510			468
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		533			460			1,485			1,293
Federal funds sold		—			—			—			7
Total interest and dividend income		72,480			69,438			221,775			216,472
Interest expense
Deposits		5,135			7,023			17,541			22,181
Long-term borrowings		1,952			1,951			6,346			5,823
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1			115			3			884
Other borrowings		6			15			33			53
Total interest expense		7,094			9,104			23,923			28,941
Net interest income		65,386			60,334			197,852			187,531
Provision for loan losses		984			5,771			10,853			17,755
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		64,402			54,563			186,999			169,776
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts		6,034			5,058			18,711			17,381
Fees on mortgage loans originated and sold		1,477			1,612			4,319			3,920
Investment advisory and trust fees		740			253			1,380			991
FDIC indemnification asset (amortization) accretion		(502	)		850			(3,779	)		1,008
Debit card income		2,854			2,442			8,669			7,792
Other income		4,078			1,675			9,591			4,152
Legal Settlements and insurance recoveries		900			3,460			900			3,460
Investment securities (losses) gains, net		(247	)		4,918			(42	)		8,610
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments:
Gross impairment loss		(54	)		—			(54	)		(44	)
Less: Impairments recognized in other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings		(54	)		—			(54	)		(44	)
Total noninterest income		15,280			20,268			39,695			47,270
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		22,606			21,295			66,085			66,951
Stock-based compensation expense		1,371			4,242			4,312			14,927
Net occupancy and equipment expense		10,740			9,355			31,973			28,229
OREO valuation expenses		6,045			8,633			18,844			15,529
Loss (gain) on sales of OREO		188			(1,514	)		(3,204	)		(3,937	)
Foreclosed asset related expense		1,265			2,530			4,909			7,414
Loan workout expense		2,063			2,310			6,363			5,755
Conversion and merger related expense		(19	)		3,894			234			6,939
Professional fees		2,426			2,759			7,418			9,511
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		(430	)		2,946			(122	)		3,267
Legal settlement expenses		535			1,755			535			2,752
Computer services		3,231			2,368			9,872			6,913
CVR (income) expense		(776	)		(179	)		2,535			(179	)
FDIC assessments		1,710			1,655			5,276			4,955
Telecommunication expenses		1,534			1,630			4,919			4,208
Other expenses		6,774			5,692			20,009			18,004
Total noninterest expense		59,263			69,371			179,958			191,238
Income before income taxes		20,419			5,460			46,736			25,808
Income tax expense (benefit)		8,975			(32,385	)		20,098			(24,573	)
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests		11,444			37,845			26,638			50,381
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			2,762			—			4,534
Net income attributable to Capital Bank Financial Corp.	$	11,444		$	35,083		$	26,638		$	45,847
Basic income per share	$	0.22		$	0.76		$	0.50		$	1.01
Diluted income per share	$	0.22		$	0.75		$	0.49		$	1.00

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

CAPITAL BANK FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Net income	$	11,444		$	37,845		$	26,638		$	50,381
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities		17,692			6,374			(15,826	)		15,680
Unrealized holding loss on investment securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity		(9,354	)		—			(9,354	)		—
Less: Reclassification adjustments for losses (gains) recognized in income		54			(4,913	)		(151	)		(8,439	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax		8,392			1,461			(25,331	)		7,241
Tax effect		(3,234	)		(564	)		9,748			(2,792	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		5,158			897			(15,583	)		4,449
Comprehensive income	$	16,602		$	38,742		$	11,055		$	54,830
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			2,803			—			4,895
Comprehensive income attributable to Capital Bank Financial Corp.	$	16,602		$	35,939		$	11,055		$	49,935

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in thousands)	Shares Common Stock Class A Outstanding			Class A Stock		Shares Common Stock Class B Outstanding			Class B Stock			Additional Paid in Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Treasury Stock			Non-controlling Interests			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, December 31, 2012		33,025		$	330		22,821		$	228		$	1,076,797		$	68,641	$	9,347		$	—		$	—		$	1,155,343
Net income		—			—		—			—			—			26,638		—			—			—			26,638
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $9,748		—			—		—			—			—			—		(15,583	)		—			—			(15,583	)
Fractional shares		—			—		8			—			(1	)		—		—			—			—			(1	)
Stock based compensation and related tax effect		—			—		—			—			4,312			—		—			—			—			4,312
Restricted stock grants		4			—		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—
Purchase of treasury stock		(3,439	)		—		—			—			—			—		—			(62,884	)		—			(62,884	)
Conversion of shares		3,148			31		(3,148	)		(31	)		—			—		—			—			—			—
Balance, September 30, 2013		32,738		$	361		19,681		$	197		$	1,081,108		$	95,279	$	(6,236	)	$	(62,884	)	$	—		$	1,107,825
Balance, December 31, 2011		20,028		$	200		26,122		$	261		$	890,627		$	18,150	$	7,167		$	—		$	74,505		$	990,910
Net income		—			—		—			—			—			45,847		—			—			4,534			50,381
Other comprehensive income , net of tax benefit of $2,792		—			—		—			—			—			—		4,088			—			361			4,449
Restricted stock grants		306			3		—			—			(3	)		—		—			—			—			—
Stock based compensation and related tax effect		—			—		—			—			14,914			—		—			—			13			14,927
Issuance of shares for noncontrolling interest		3,706			37		—			—			78,128			—		1,248						(79,413	)		—
Initial public offering		5,682			57		—			—			89,407			—		—			—			—			89,464
Conversion of shares		2,924			29		(2,924	)		(29	)		—			—		—			—			—			—
Balance, September 30, 2012		32,646		$	326		23,198		$	232		$	1,073,073		$	63,997	$	12,503		$	—		$	—			1,150,131

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)	Nine Months  Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	26,638		$	50,381
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Accretion of acquired loans		(126,634	)		(142,024	)
Depreciation and amortization		15,795			12,111
Provision for loan losses		10,853			17,755
Deferred income tax		14,977			(33,037	)
Net amortization of investment securities premium/discount		9,339			9,209
Other than temporary impairment of investment securities		54			44
Net realized losses (gains) on investment securities		42			(8,610	)
Stock-based compensation expense		4,312			14,927
Gain on sales of OREO		(3,204	)		(3,937	)
OREO valuation expenses		18,844			15,529
Other		(2,454	)		(1,184	)
(Gains) losses on extinguishment of debt		(122	)		3,267
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(138,686	)		(137,633	)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans originated for sale		145,363			149,370
Fees on mortgage loans originated and sold		(4,319	)		(3,920	)
FDIC indemnification asset amortization (accretion)		3,779			(1,008	)
(Gain) loss on sale/disposal of premises and equipment		(419	)		85
Gain on exchange of partnership interest		(1,536	)		—
Proceeds from FDIC loss share agreements		12,211			19,264
Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		10,507			(1,593	)
Change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		6,658			2,684
Net cash provided by (used) in operating activities		1,998			(38,320	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale		(436,365	)		(666,605	)
Sales of investment securities available-for-sale		225			340,026
Repayments of principal and maturities of investment securities available for sale		178,592			177,781
Repayments of principal and maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity		27,347			—
Net purchases of FHLB and Federal Reserve stock		(978	)		1,147
Purchase of trademark		—			(100	)
Net decrease in loans		319,814			297,418
Purchases of premises and equipment		(2,473	)		(11,716	)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment		6,707			—
Proceeds from sales of OREO		62,165			77,073
Net cash provided by investing activities		155,034			215,024
Cash flows from financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in demand, money market and savings accounts		(113,473	)		123,237
Net decrease in time deposits		(490,925	)		(401,166	)
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(18,284	)		(12,839	)
Net decrease of long term FHLB advances		(136	)		(223,162	)
Prepayment of long-term borrowings		(42,500	)		—
Purchase of treasury stock		(62,884	)		—
Proceeds from initial public offering		—			89,465
Net cash used in financing activities		(728,202	)		(424,465	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(571,170	)		(247,761	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		734,874			709,963
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	163,704		$	462,202
Supplemental disclosures of cash:
Interest paid	$	28,725		$	34,074
Cash collections of contractual interest on purchased credit impaired loans		91,983			84,441
Income taxes paid		1,641			16,781
Supplemental disclosures of noncash transactions :
OREO acquired through loan transfers	$	53,366		$	65,530
Transfer of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity securities		510,976			—
Transfer of OREO to premises and equipment		—			1,026
Transfer of financed portion of premises and equipment sold		—			930
Non-cash portion of acquired premises and equipment		—			(2,717	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations

Capital Bank Financial Corp (“CBF” or the “Company”; formerly known as North American Financial Holdings, Inc.) is a bank holding company incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Florida whose business is conducted primarily through Capital Bank, National Association (“Capital Bank, NA” or the “Bank”). CBF has a total of 163 full service banking offices located in Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.

In September 2012, Capital Bank Corporation (“CBKN”), Green Bankshares Inc. (“GRNB”) and TIB Financial Corp. (“TIBB”), then majority owned subsidiaries of the Company, merged with and into Capital Bank Financial Corp. with CBF continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Reorganization”). Upon completion of the Reorganization, the outstanding common shares held by the minority shareholders were converted into an aggregate of 3.7 million shares of CBF’s Class A common stock.

The Reorganization was accounted for as a merger with CBF as the accounting acquirer (which is the surviving entity for legal purposes). As this was a common control transaction under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, the Reorganization was accounted for as an equity transaction in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation, as the acquisition of a noncontrolling interest. As a result, there was no adjustment to CBF’s historical carrying amounts of assets and liabilities reflected in the accompanying balance sheet.

On October 1, 2012, the Company completed its acquisition of Southern Community Financial Corporation (“SCMF” or “Southern Community”), a publicly held bank holding company headquartered in Winston Salem, North Carolina. See Note 3 – Business Combinations, for further information regarding this acquisition.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by US GAAP for complete financial statement presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals and disclosures considered necessary for a fair interim presentation have been included. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For further information refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Direct Financing Leases

Direct financing leases are carried at the aggregate of lease payments receivable and estimated residual value of the leased property, if applicable, less unearned income. Interest income on direct financing leases is recognized over the term of the leases to achieve a constant periodic rate of return on the outstanding investment. Initial direct costs are deferred and amortized over the lease term as a reduction to interest income using the effective interest method.

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are currently any such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists”. This update requires an unrecognized tax benefit related to a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward to be presented as a reduction to a deferred tax asset, unless the tax benefit is not available at the reporting date to settle any additional income taxes under the tax law of the applicable tax jurisdiction. For public entities, this ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income .” This update requires entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, entities are required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income. For public entities, this ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2012. This update adopted on January 1, 2013, as required, impacted presentation only and it did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

8

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-06, “Business Combinations: Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution.” This ASU addresses the diversity in practice about how to interpret the terms on the same basis and contractual limitations when subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized in a government-assisted (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or National Credit Union Administration) acquisition of a financial institution that includes a loss-sharing agreement (indemnification agreement). For public and nonpublic entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The amendments should be applied prospectively to any new indemnification assets acquired after the date of adoption and to indemnification assets existing as of the date of adoption arising from a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. The adoption on January 1, 2013, as required, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Subsequent changes in the measurement of the indemnification asset will be accounted for on the same basis as the changes in the assets subject to indemnification resulting from future changes in the expected cash flows.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This update requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The application of this ASU was clarified by ASU 2013-01. The scope of this ASU includes derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements and reverse sale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. The Company is required to adopt this update for periods beginning after January 1, 2013, with restrocpective presentation for all comparative periods. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

9

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

2. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share is net income attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and unvested restricted shares computed using the treasury stock method. Earnings per share have been computed based on the following:

(Shares in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013		Three Months Ended September  30, 2012		Nine Months Ended September  30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		51,804		46,116		53,170		45,496
Dilutive effect of options outstanding		31		—		—		—
Dilutive effect of restricted shares		920		622		862		456
Diluted		52,755		46,738		54,032		45,952

The dilutive effect of stock options and unvested restricted shares are the only common stock equivalents for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per common share.

Weighted average anti-dilutive stock options and unvested restricted shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share are as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	Three Months Ended September  30, 2013		Three Months Ended September  30, 2012		Nine Months Ended September  30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012
Anti-dilutive stock options		269		2,867		3,133		2,837
Anti-dilutive restricted shares		—		—		—		—

10

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

3. Business Combinations and Acquisitions

CBF Acquisition of Southern Community Financial Corporation

On October 1, 2012, the acquisition of all of the preferred and common share interests of Southern Community was consummated for a total purchase price of $99.3 million in cash. In addition, SCMF shareholders received a contingent value right (“CVR”) which could pay up to $1.30 per share (maximum potential payment of $21.9 million) in cash at the end of a five-year period based on 75% of the savings to the extent that legacy loan and foreclosed asset losses are less than a prescribed amount. As part of the acquisition, the Company purchased from the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) all of the outstanding shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A and related warrants originally issued by SCMF to the Treasury in connection with SCMF’s participation in the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”). The cash purchase price included approximately $46.9 million paid in cash to the Treasury, which is equal to the outstanding liquidation amount of the preferred stock and is included in the $99.3 million above. Subsequently, SCMF cancelled the Series A Preferred stock. SCMF was the parent of Southern Community Bank and Trust, a bank with 22 branches in Winston-Salem, the Piedmont Triad, and other North Carolina markets. The estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of SCMF were based on the information that was available at the time. During the third quarter of 2013, CBF concluded that the underlying asset quality in the SCMF loan portfolio should lead to better credit performance than originally anticipated in our preliminary estimates of fair value. Completion of portfolio due diligence of credit attributes of the acquired loans not initially known but existing at the acquisition date, including assessment of the predecessor institution’s underwriting approach and practices, quality of risk ratings, and borrower credit scores, ultimately resulted in the necessity to revise the original estimate of fair value during the third quarter. As required by the acquisition method of accounting, the Company retrospectively adjusted the acquisition date balance sheet and the results of operations of the fourth quarter of 2012 and first two quarters of 2013 to reflect the following: (1) an increase in the estimated fair value of the loan portfolio; (2) an increase in the associated CVR; (3) a decrease in the deferred tax asset related to the increased value of loans; (4) a decrease in Goodwill caused by the net effect of these adjustments. All amounts presented herein reflect such adjustments. A reconciliation of their impact on the acquired assets, assumed liabilities and prior period operating results is shown below:

(Dollars in thousands)	Reported on Dec. 31, 2012 as of October 1, 2012		Measurement Period Adjustments			Revised as of October 1,  2012
Fair value of assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	256,267				$	256,267
Investment securities		189,771					189,771
Loans		774,781		43,238			818,019
Premises and equipment		35,061					35,061
Other intangible assets		6,860					6,860
Deferred tax asset		43,481		(15,532	)		27,949
Other assets		60,159		(174	)		59,985
Total assets acquired		1,366,380		27,532			1,393,912
Fair value of liabilities assumed:
Deposits		1,093,914					1,093,914
Long term debt and other borrowings		187,341					187,341
Other liabilities		17,703		11,656			29,359
Total liabilities assumed		1,298,958		11,656			1,310,614
Fair value of net assets acquired		67,422		15,876			83,298
Purchase price		99,325					99,325
Goodwill	$	31,903	$	(15,876	)	$	16,027

11

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	For the Quarter Ended
	June 30, 2013 Revised		June 30, 2013 As Filed		March 31, 2013 Revised		March 31, 2013 As Filed		December 31, 2012 Revised		December 31, 2012 As filed
Interest and dividend income	$	73,189	$	74,989	$	76,106	$	76,814	$	77,808	$	76,122
Interest expense		7,837		7,837	$	8,992		8,992		10,115		10,115
Net Interest Income		65,352		67,152		67,114		67,822		67,693		66,007
Provision for loan losses		4,467		3,868		5,402		6,904		6,736		4,370
Total non-interest income		13,506		13,506		10,909		10,909		15,438		15,438
Total non-interest expense		59,382		59,141		61,313		61,040		68,720		68,448
Income before income taxes		15,009		17,649		11,308		10,787		7,675		8,627
Income tax expense		5,580		6,514		5,543		5,234		3,031		3,295
Net income attributable to Capital Bank Financial Corp.	$	9,429	$	11,135	$	5,765	$	5,553		4,644	$	5,332
Basic Earnings Per Common Share	$	0.18	$	0.21	$	0.11	$	0.10	$	0.09	$	0.10
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share	$	0.17	$	0.21	$	0.11	$	0.10	$	0.08	$	0.10

Pro Forma

The following table reflects the pro forma total net interest income, non-interest income and net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 as though the acquisition of SCMF had taken place as of the beginning of fiscal 2012. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisition actually taken place on the first day of the respective period, nor of future results of operations.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,  2012		Nine Months Ended September 30,  2012
Net interest income	$	69,422	$	218,207
Non-interest income		34,467		68,800
Net income attributable to Capital Bank Financial Corp.		46,604		59,274

4. Investment Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012 are presented below:

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013
Available-for-sale	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Asset-backed securities	$	139,148	$	—	$	1,187	$	137,961
Marketable equity securities		946		—		—		946
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		574,051		4,229		3,879		574,401
Industrial revenue bond		3,750		215		—		3,965
Collateralized debt obligations		505		—		176		329
Total	$	718,400	$	4,444	$	5,242	$	717,602
Held-to-maturity
U.S. Government agencies		15,192		—		307		14,885
States and political subdivisions—tax exempt		14,172		44		27		14,189
States and political subdivisions—taxable		547		—		6		541
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		453,075		1,520		797		453,798
Total	$	482,986	$	1,564	$	1,137	$	483,413

12

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2012
Available-for-sale	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Asset-backed securities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government agencies		7,913		102		—		8,015
States and political subdivisions—tax exempt		16,019		1,196		—		17,215
States and political subdivisions—taxable		509		64		—		573
Marketable equity securities		2,731		—		12		2,719
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		959,863		15,048		1,058		973,853
Industrial revenue bond		3,750		50		—		3,800
Corporate bonds		26		—		—		26
Trust preferred securities		250		—		4		246
Collateralized debt obligations		505		—		208		297
Total	$	991,566	$	16,460	$	1,282	$	1,006,744

During the third quarter of 2013, the Company transferred $511.0 million of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity securities, reflecting the Company’s intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Transfers of investment securities into the held-to-maturity category from the available-for-sale category are accounted for at fair value at the date of transfer. The related $9.7 million of unrealized holding loss, net of tax, that was included in the transfer is retained in other comprehensive income (loss) and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the remaining life of the securities. There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of this transfer. There was no investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2012.

13

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Proceeds from sales and calls of securities were $0.5 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Gross gains of approximately $0 and $0.2 million were realized on these sales and calls during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale were $247.3 million and $340.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Gross gains of approximately $4.9 million and $8.4 million were realized on these sales and calls during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Trading securities totaled $6.1 million and $0 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Gross realized losses on trading securities were $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Gross realized gains on trading securities were $0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

The estimated fair value of investment securities at September 30, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown as follows. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations without call or prepayment penalties. Debt securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.

(Dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Yield
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—		—	%
Due after one year through five years		—		—		—	%
Due after five years through ten years		58,422		58,064		0.62	%
Due after ten years		84,981		84,191		0.69	%
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		574,051		574,401		1.54	%
	$	717,454	$	716,656		1.36	%
Marketable equity securities		946		946
	$	718,400	$	717,602

Held-to-maturity	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Yield
Due in one year or less	$	679	$	678		0.83	%
Due after one year through five years		1,130		1,134		2.06	%
Due after five years through ten years		7,198		7,197		3.03	%
Due after ten years		20,904		20,606		3.05	%
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		453,075		453,798		2.23	%
	$	482,986	$	483,413		2.27	%

14

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Securities with unrealized losses not recognized in income, and the period of time they have been in an unrealized loss position, are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
September 30, 2013	Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Available-for-sale:
Asset-backed securities	$	137,961	$	1,187	$	—	$	—	$	137,961	$	1,187
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		338,084		3,879		—		—		338,084		3,879
Collateralized debt obligation		—		—		329		176		329		176
Total	$	476,045	$	5,066	$	329	$	176	$	476,374	$	5,242
Held-to-maturity:
U.S. Government agencies	$	14,885	$	307	$	—	$	—	$	14,885	$	307
State and political subdivisions—tax exempt		7,656		27		—		—		7,656		27
State and political subdivisions—taxable		541		6		—		—		541		6
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		81,712		797		—		—		81,712		797
Total	$	104,794	$	1,137	$	—	$	—	$	104,794	$	1,137

(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
December 31, 2012	Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Available-for-sale:
Marketable equity securities	$	988	$	12	$	—	$	—	$	988	$	12
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		247,515		846		21,221		212		268,736		1,058
Trust preferred securities		246		4		—		—		246		4
Collateralized debt obligation		—		—		297		208		297		208
Total	$	248,749	$	862	$	21,518	$	420	$	270,267	$	1,282

There was no investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2012.

The table below presents a rollforward for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 of the other than temporary impairment credit losses recognized in earnings.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013		Three Months Ended September 30, 2012		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Beginning balance	$	660	$	660	$	660	$	616
Additions/subtractions:
Credit losses recognized during the period		54		—		54		44
Ending balance	$	714	$	660	$	714	$	660

15

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Company owns shares of an investment fund with the principal investment strategy to invest in debt securities and other debt instruments that will cause shares of the fund to be deemed qualified under the Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”), so that financial institutions that are subject to the CRA may receive investment test or similar credit under the CRA with respect to shares of the Fund held by them. Valuation and measurement of OTTI of this investment falls under ASC 320-10-S991, Other Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments in Equity Securities. The Company evaluates the intent and ability to hold for any anticipated recovery in fair value and the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost.

Based on the extended period the security fair value has been less than cost, and market information that indicates the prospects for recovery in the near-term are unlikely, the Company determined there to be OTTI as of September 30, 2013. The Company recognized $54 thousand of impairment loss in earnings, equal to the entire difference between the security’s cost basis and its fair value.

The Company owns a collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) collateralized by trust preferred securities issued primarily by banks and several insurance companies. Valuation and measurement of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of this investment falls under ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The Company compares the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to ensure there are no adverse changes in the expected cash flows which would require the recognition of impairment. The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow valuation model which considers the structure and term of the CDO and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults by issuers of the underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates. Interest payment deferrals are generally treated as defaults even though they may not actually result in defaults.

Based on this analysis, the estimated fair value of the CDO increased by $32 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. In addition, the credit loss potential of the CDO declined. Since previous credit impairment was recognized, no recovery is allowed under U.S. GAAP. The CDO was recorded at fair value and the remaining unrealized loss was recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company’s security portfolio consisted of 139 securities, 60 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of unrealized losses are related to the Company’s mortgage-backed securities.

The majority of the mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support. Unrealized losses associated with these securities are attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2013, or December 31, 2012.

Investment securities having carrying values of approximately $303.0 million at September 30, 2013 were pledged to secure public funds on deposit, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and for other purposes as required by law.

5. Loans

Major classifications of loans, including loans held for sale, are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	803,954	$	904,215
Other commercial construction and land		326,040		415,969
Multifamily commercial real estate		72,627		84,838
1-4 family residential construction and land		76,013		91,680
Total commercial real estate		1,278,634		1,496,702
Owner occupied commercial real estate		1,052,994		1,065,900
Commercial and industrial loans		681,882		665,507
Lease financing		2,554		—
Total commercial		1,737,430		1,731,407
1-4 family residential		816,915		838,557
Home equity loans		386,071		430,887
Other consumer loans		158,452		136,806
Total consumer		1,361,438		1,406,250
Other (1)		99,778		101,131
Total loans	$	4,477,280	$	4,735,490

(1) Other loans include $45.7 million and $27.0 million and $45.3 million and $26.0 million of farm land and agricultural and state and political subdivision obligations as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

16

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Total loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, include $8.9 million and $11.3 million of 1-4 family residential loans held for sale and $3.1 million and $0.7 million of deferred loan origination costs, respectively.

Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC subject to loss sharing agreements. Covered loans are further broken out into (i) loans acquired with evidence of credit impairment (“Purchased Credit Impaired or PCI Loans”) and (ii) non-PCI loans. Loans originated by the Company and loans acquired through the purchase of CBKN, GRNB, SCMF and TIBB are not subject to the loss sharing agreements and are classified as “none covered.” Additionally, certain consumer loans acquired through the acquisitions of First National Bank in Spartanburg, South Carolina, Metro Bank in Miami, Florida and Turnberry Bank in Aventura, Florida (collectively, the “Failed Banks”) from the FDIC are specifically excluded from the loss sharing agreements.

The Company designates loans as PCI loans by evaluating both qualitative and quantitative factors. The loans are analyzed by taking into account the individual loan risk rating assigned by the Company along with an understanding of the credit underwriting and monitoring practices of the originating institution as well as loan level data available regarding credit risk, such as delinquency status, origination vintage, accrual and charge off history.

Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with acquisition accounting, exclusive of any loss share agreements with the FDIC. The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows adjusted for expected credit losses and interest rate fluctuations. At the time of acquisition, the Company accounted for the PCI loans by segregating each portfolio into loan pools with similar risk characteristics, which included:

• The loan type based on regulatory reporting guidelines, namely whether the loan was a mortgage, consumer, or commercial loan;

• The nature of collateral; and

• The relative credit risk of the loan on performance.

From these pools, the Company uses certain loan information, including outstanding principal balance, estimated expected losses, weighted average maturity, weighted average term to re-price (if a variable rate loan), weighted average margin, and weighted average interest rate to estimate the expected cash flow for each loan pool. Over the lives of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on each loan pool. The Company evaluates, at each balance sheet date, whether its estimates of the present value of the cash flows from the loan pools, determined using the effective interest rates, has decreased, such that the present value of such cash flows is less than the recorded investment of the pool, and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of income, unless interest rate driven. Additionally, if we have favorable changes in our estimates of cash flows expected to be collected for a loan pool such that the then-present value exceeds the recorded investment of that pool, we will first reverse any previously established allowance for loan losses for the pool. If such estimate exceeds the amount of any previously established allowance, we will accrete future interest income over the remaining life of the pool at a rate which, when used to discount the expected cash flows, results in the then-present value of such cash flows equaling the recorded investment of the pool at the time of the revised estimate.

The table below presents a rollforward of accretable yield and income expected to be earned related to purchased credit-impaired loans:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Balance, beginning of period	$	444,481		$	609,993		$	553,348		$	715,479
New loans purchased		—			—			—			—
Accretion of income		(39,625	)		(43,927	)		(126,634	)		(142,024	)
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference		15,018			19,134			46,117			76,697
Disposals		(21,459	)		(35,160	)		(74,416	)		(100,112	)
Balance, end of period	$	398,415		$	550,040		$	398,415		$	550,040

As a result of the measurement period adjustment discussed in Note 3. Business Combinations and Acquisitions, the beginning of period balance and accretion of income was impacted by $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Nonaccretable difference represents contractually required payments in excess of the amount of estimated cash flows expected to be collected. The accretable yield represents the excess of estimated cash flows expected to be collected over the initial fair value of the PCI loans. Disposals represent reductions of accretable yield due to non-credit events such as interest rate reductions on variable rate loans and prepayment activity on loans.

17

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The accretable yield is accreted into interest income over the estimated life of the PCI loans using the level yield method. The accretable yield will change due to changes in:

• The estimate of the remaining life of PCI loans which may change the amount of future interest income, and possibly principal, expected to be collected;

• The estimate of the amount of contractually required principal and interest payments over the estimated life that will not be collected (the nonaccretable difference); and

• Indices for PCI loans with variable rates of interest.

For PCI loans, the impact of loan modifications is included in the evaluation of expected cash flows for subsequent decreases or increases of cash flows. For variable rate PCI loans, expected future cash flows will be recalculated as the rates adjust over the lives of the loans. At acquisition, the expected future cash flows were based on the variable rates that were in effect at that time.

Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of CBF covered loans and foreclosed real estate are significantly different from those assets not covered under the loss share agreement. Refer to Note 8 – Other Real Estate Owned, for the covered and non-covered balances of other real estate owned.

As a result of overall improvement of credit loss expectations in our most recent estimates of cash flows, substantially related to the Company’s legacy Green Bankshares and Southern Community portfolios, the Company recognized $(0.8) million in CVR income and a $2.5 million expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.

Non-covered Loans

The following is a summary of the major categories of non-covered loans outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2013	PCI Loans		Non-PCI Loans		Total Non-covered Loans
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	476,248	$	260,773	$	737,021
Other commercial C&D		240,931		64,490		305,421
Multifamily commercial real estate		36,040		26,150		62,190
1-4 family residential C&D		18,079		57,934		76,013
Total commercial real estate		771,298		409,347		1,180,645
Owner occupied commercial real estate		321,684		657,677		979,361
Commercial and industrial		140,800		530,111		670,911
Lease financing		—		2,554		2,554
Total commercial		462,484		1,190,342		1,652,826
1-4 family residential		374,519		364,549		739,068
Home equity		104,927		227,959		332,886
Consumer		14,754		143,629		158,383
Total consumer		494,200		736,137		1,230,337
Other		48,217		50,530		98,747
Total	$	1,776,199	$	2,386,356	$	4,162,555

18

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2012	PCI Loans		Non-PCI Loans		Total Non-covered Loans
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	628,234	$	181,009	$	809,243
Other commercial C&D		328,280		55,967		384,247
Multifamily commercial real estate		46,146		27,078		73,224
1-4 family residential C&D		45,305		42,208		87,513
Total commercial real estate		1,047,965		306,262		1,354,227
Owner occupied commercial real estate		425,869		556,025		981,894
Commercial and industrial		194,481		453,969		648,450
Leasing		—		—		—
Total commercial		620,350		1,009,994		1,630,344
1-4 family residential		486,122		260,622		746,744
Home equity		129,967		240,810		370,777
Consumer		28,109		108,512		136,621
Total consumer		644,198		609,944		1,254,142
Other		56,287		40,480		96,767
Total	$	2,368,800	$	1,966,680	$	4,335,480

Covered Loans

The following is a summary of the major categories of covered loans outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2013	PCI Loans		Non-PCI Loans		Total Covered Loans
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	66,933	$	—	$	66,933
Other commercial C&D		20,619		—		20,619
Multifamily commercial real estate		10,437		—		10,437
1-4 family residential C&D		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		97,989		—		97,989
Owner occupied commercial real estate		73,633		—		73,633
Commercial and industrial		10,612		359		10,971
Leasing		—		—		—
Total commercial		84,245		359		84,604
1-4 family residential		77,055		792		77,847
Home equity		16,038		37,147		53,185
Consumer		69		—		69
Total consumer		93,162		37,939		131,101
Other		1,031		—		1,031
Total	$	276,427	$	38,298	$	314,725

19

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2012	PCI Loans		Non-PCI Loans		Total Covered Loans
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	94,916	$	56	$	94,972
Other commercial C&D		31,722		—		31,722
Multifamily commercial real estate		11,614		—		11,614
1-4 family residential C&D		4,167		—		4,167
Total commercial real estate		142,419		56		142,475
Owner occupied commercial real estate		84,006		—		84,006
Commercial and industrial		16,451		606		17,057
Leasing		—		—		—
Total commercial		100,457		606		101,063
1-4 family residential		91,586		227		91,813
Home equity		16,823		43,287		60,110
Consumer		185		—		185
Total consumer		108,594		43,514		152,108
Other		4,364		—		4,364
Total	$	355,834	$	44,176	$	400,010

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans, based on contractual terms, as of September 30, 2013 by class of loans:

(Dollars in thousands)
Non-purchased credit impaired loans	30-89 Days Past Due				Greater than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing/Accreting				Nonaccrual				Total
	Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	—	$	201	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	94	$	295
Other commercial C&D		—		150		—		—		—		441		591
Multifamily commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
1-4 family residential C&D		—		—		—		—		—		2,581		2,581
Total commercial real estate		—		351		—		—		—		3,116		3,467
Owner occupied commercial real estate		—		173		—		—		—		2,252		2,425
Commercial and industrial		—		12		—		—		66		2,512		2,590
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		—		185		—		—		66		4,764		5,015
1-4 family residential		—		814		—		—		—		952		1,766
Home equity		402		731		—		—		1,190		2,919		5,242
Consumer		—		1,452		—		—		—		805		2,257
Total consumer		402		2,997		—		—		1,190		4,676		9,265
Other		—		—		—		—		—		11		11
Total	$	402	$	3,533	$	—	$	—	$	1,256	$	12,567	$	17,758

20

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)
Purchased credit impaired loans	30-89 Days Past Due				Greater than 90 Day Past Due and Still Accruing/Accreting				Nonaccrual				Total
	Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	243	$	4,847	$	12,199	$	42,040	$	—	$	—	$	59,329
Other commercial C&D		—		5,631		10,313		60,915		—		—		76,859
Multifamily commercial real estate		—		119		957		3,378		—		—		4,454
1-4 family residential C&D		—		10		—		3,041		—		—		3,051
Total commercial real estate		243		10,607		23,469		109,374		—		—		143,693
Owner occupied commercial real estate		247		3,353		4,870		37,136		—		—		45,606
Commercial and industrial		—		4,068		167		22,784		—		—		27,019
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		247		7,421		5,037		59,920		—		—		72,625
1-4 family residential		374		8,010		10,643		41,008		—		—		60,035
Home equity		39		1,602		1,821		6,711		—		—		10,173
Consumer		—		512		33		380		—		—		925
Total consumer		413		10,124		12,497		48,099		—		—		71,133
Other		—		438		5		3,069		—		—		3,512
Total	$	903	$	28,590	$	41,008	$	220,462	$	—	$	—	$	290,963

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans, based on contractual terms, as of December 31, 2012 by class of loans:

(Dollars in thousands)
Non-purchased credit impaired loans	30-89 Days Past Due				Greater than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing/Accreting				Nonaccrual				Total
	Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	56	$	24	$	80
Other commercial C&D		—		—		—		—		—		97		97
Multifamily commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
1-4 family residential C&D		—		474		—		—		—		363		837
Total commercial real estate		—		474		—		—		56		484		1,014
Owner occupied commercial real estate		—		405		—		—		—		1,966		2,371
Commercial and industrial		—		608		—		—		276		2,057		2,941
Leasing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		—		1,013		—		—		276		4,023		5,312
1-4 family residential		—		1,648		—		—		—		3,731		5,379
Home equity		1,614		1,416		—		—		2,460		2,613		8,103
Consumer		—		1,873		—		—		—		368		2,241
Total consumer		1,614		4,937		—		—		2,460		6,712		15,723
Other		—		49		—		—		—		—		49
Total	$	1,614	$	6,473	$	—	$	—	$	2,792	$	11,219	$	22,098

21

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)
Purchased credit impaired loans	30-89 Days Past Due				Greater than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing/Accreting				Nonaccrual				Total
	Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered		Covered		Non-Covered
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	2,799	$	4,662	$	17,286	$	44,917	$	—	$	—	$	69,664
Other commercial C&D		135		7,183		21,659		84,189		—		—		113,166
Multifamily commercial real estate		—		194		3,612		2,755		—		—		6,561
1-4 family residential C&D		—		2,405		3,482		5,145		—		—		11,032
Total commercial real estate		2,934		14,444		46,039		137,006		—		—		200,423
Owner occupied commercial real estate		873		4,210		7,646		54,971		—		—		67,700
Commercial and industrial		99		3,921		2,045		32,007		—		—		38,072
Leasing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		972		8,131		9,691		86,978		—		—		105,772
1-4 family residential		1,214		15,550		13,685		41,905		—		—		72,354
Home equity		345		4,224		3,024		10,247		—		—		17,840
Consumer		1		1,213		—		493		—		—		1,707
Total consumer		1,560		20,987		16,709		52,645		—		—		91,901
Other		—		2,918		1,014		1,988		—		—		5,920
Total	$	5,466	$	46,480	$	73,453	$	278,617	$	—	$	—	$	404,016

PCI loans are not classified as nonaccrual as they are considered to be accruing because their interest income relates to the accretable yield recognized under accounting for purchased credit-impaired loans and not to contractual interest payments.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on a monthly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

• Pass—These loans range from superior quality with minimal credit risk to loans requiring heightened management attention but that are still an acceptable risk and continue to perform as contracted.

• Special Mention—Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

• Substandard—Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

• Doubtful—Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

22

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes loans, excluding purchased credit-impaired loans, monitored for credit quality based on internal ratings at September 30, 2013:

					Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Accruing/ Accreting		Nonaccrual		Doubtful		Total
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	259,151	$	644	$	884	$	94	$	—	$	260,773
Other commercial C&D		63,233		666		150		441		—		64,490
Multifamily commercial real estate		25,842		—		308		—		—		26,150
1-4 family residential C&D		50,810		1,565		2,978		2,581		—		57,934
Total commercial real estate		399,036		2,875		4,320		3,116		—		409,347
Owner occupied commercial real estate		653,194		—		2,231		2,252		—		657,677
Commercial and industrial		519,704		5,408		2,780		2,578		—		530,470
Lease financing		2,554		—		—		—		—		2,554
Total commercial		1,175,452		5,408		5,011		4,830		—		1,190,701
1-4 family residential		364,359		30		—		952		—		365,341
Home equity		258,591		237		2,169		4,109		—		265,106
Consumer		142,793		—		31		805		—		143,629
Total consumer		765,743		267		2,200		5,866		—		774,076
Other		50,245		—		274		11		—		50,530
Total	$	2,390,476	$	8,550	$	11,805	$	13,823	$	—	$	2,424,654

The following table summarizes loans, excluding purchased credit-impaired loans, monitored for credit quality based on internal ratings at December 31, 2012:

					Substandard
	Pass		Special Mention		Accruing/ Accreting		Nonaccrual		Doubtful		Total
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	180,080	$	—	$	905	$	80	$	—	$	181,065
Other commercial C&D		55,394		325		150		98		—		55,967
Multifamily commercial real estate		26,760		—		318		—		—		27,078
1-4 family residential C&D		39,026		160		2,659		363		—		42,208
Total commercial real estate		301,260		485		4,032		541		—		306,318
Owner occupied commercial real estate		548,506		2,953		2,600		1,966		—		556,025
Commercial and industrial		437,904		1,470		12,868		2,333		—		454,575
Leasing		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		986,410		4,423		15,468		4,299		—		1,010,600
1-4 family residential		256,805		313		—		3,731		—		260,849
Home equity		274,827		777		3,420		5,073		—		284,097
Consumer		107,924		110		111		367		—		108,512
Total consumer		639,556		1,200		3,531		9,171		—		653,458
Other		40,431		49		—		—		—		40,480
Total	$	1,967,657	$	6,157	$	23,031	$	14,011	$	—	$	2,010,856

23

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

6. Allowance for Loan Losses

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September  30, 2013			Three Months Ended September  30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012
Balance, beginning of period	$	56,832		$	45,472		$	57,262		$	34,749
Provision (Reversal) for loan losses on PCI loans		(72	)		4,698			(703	)		12,050
Provision for loan losses on non-PCI loans		1,056			1,073			11,556			5,705
PCI loans charged off		—			—			—			—
Non PCI loans charged off		(1,945	)		(824	)		(15,335	)		(3,690	)
Recoveries of PCI loans previously charged off		—			—			—			—
Recoveries of non-PCI loans previously charged off		522			1,168			3,613			2,773
Balance, end of period	$	56,393		$	51,587		$	56,393		$	51,587

The following table presents the roll forward of the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 by the class of loans against which the allowance is allocated:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2013		Provision / (Reversals)			Net  (Charge- offs)/Recoveries			September 30, 2013
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	4,329	$	2,344		$	11		$	6,684
Other commercial C&D		12,310		(1,201	)		85			11,194
Multifamily commercial real estate		258		44			—			302
1-4 family residential C&D		1,806		353			2			2,161
Total commercial real estate		18,703		1,540			98			20,341
Owner occupied commercial real estate		4,696		357			17			5,070
Commercial and industrial		8,288		(264	)		(466	)		7,558
Lease financing		—		3			—			3
Total commercial		12,984		96			(449	)		12,631
1-4 family residential		17,572		(1,040	)		51			16,583
Home equity		3,937		(40	)		(120	)		3,777
Consumer		2,361		734			(565	)		2,530
Total consumer		23,870		(346	)		(634	)		22,890
Other		1,275		(306	)		(438	)		531
Total	$	56,832	$	984		$	(1,423	)	$	56,393

24

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the roll forward of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 by the class of loans against which the allowance is allocated:

(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2012		Provision / (Reversals)			Net (Charge- offs)/Recoveries			September 30, 2013
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	3,764	$	2,936		$	(16	)	$	6,684
Other commercial C&D		12,711		(2,120	)		603			11,194
Multifamily commercial real estate		348		(87	)		41			302
1-4 family residential C&D		1,716		420			25			2,161
Total commercial real estate		18,539		1,149			653			20,341
Owner occupied commercial real estate		4,055		732			283			5,070
Commercial and industrial		7,490		8,885			(8,817	)		7,558
Lease financing				3						3
Total commercial		11,545		9,620			(8,534	)		12,631
1-4 family residential		15,740		772			71			16,583
Home equity		8,670		(3,861	)		(1,032	)		3,777
Consumer		2,082		2,097			(1,649	)		2,530
Total consumer		26,492		(992	)		(2,610	)		22,890
Other		686		1,076			(1,231	)		531
Total	$	57,262	$	10,853		$	(11,722	)	$	56,393

The following table presents the roll forward of the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 by the class of loans against which the allowance is allocated:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2012		Provision / (Reversals)			Net  (Charge- offs)/Recoveries			September 30, 2012
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	2,154	$	1,434		$	4		$	3,592
Other commercial C&D		10,944		2,004			278			13,226
Multifamily commercial real estate		210		(25	)		—			185
1-4 family residential C&D		1,265		529			1			1,795
Total commercial real estate		14,573		3,942			283			18,798
Owner occupied commercial real estate		4,783		(1,126	)		237			3,894
Commercial and industrial		4,724		1,669			(14	)		6,379
Leasing		—		—			—			—
Total commercial		9,507		543			223			10,273
1-4 family residential		12,050		1,554			35			13,639
Home equity		6,998		(4	)		(469	)		6,525
Consumer		1,736		631			(406	)		1,961
Total consumer		20,784		2,181			(840	)		22,125
Other		608		(895	)		678			391
Total	$	45,472	$	5,771		$	344		$	51,587

25

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the roll forward of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 by the class of loans against which the allowance is allocated:

(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2011		Provision / (Reversals)			Net  (Charge- offs)/Recoveries			September 30, 2012
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	3,854	$	(1,028	)	$	766		$	3,592
Other commercial C&D		7,627		5,354			245			13,226
Multifamily commercial real estate		398		(213	)		—			185
1-4 family residential C&D		921		873			1			1,795
Total commercial real estate		12,800		4,986			1,012			18,798
Owner occupied commercial real estate		5,454		(1,811	)		251			3,894
Commercial and industrial		4,166		2,081			132			6,379
Leasing		—		—			—			—
Total commercial		9,620		270			383			10,273
1-4 family residential		7,252		6,304			83			13,639
Home equity		2,711		5,016			(1,202	)		6,525
Consumer		1,594		1,121			(754	)		1,961
Total consumer		11,557		12,441			(1,873	)		22,125
Other		772		58			(439	)		391
Total	$	34,749	$	17,755		$	(917	)	$	51,587

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by class of loans and by impairment evaluation method as of September 30, 2013:

	Allowance for Loan Losses						Loans
(Dollars in thousands)	Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		Purchased Credit- Impaired		Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Collectively Evaluated for Impairment (1)		Purchased Credit- Impaired
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	—	$	1,399	$	5,285	$	—	$	260,773	$	543,181
Other commercial C&D		—		1,644		9,550		—		64,490		261,550
Multifamily commercial real estate		—		109		193		—		26,150		46,477
1-4 family residential C&D		—		1,115		1,046		—		57,934		18,079
Total commercial real estate		—		4,267		16,074		—		409,347		869,287
Owner occupied commercial real estate		—		2,572		2,498		—		657,677		395,317
Commercial and industrial		64		5,266		2,228		2,318		528,152		151,412
Lease financing		—		3		—		—		2,554		—
Total commercial		64		7,841		4,726		2,318		1,188,383		546,729
1-4 family residential		—		2,217		14,366		—		356,423		451,574
Home equity		—		358		3,419		—		265,106		120,965
Consumer		1		2,152		377		15		143,614		14,823
Total consumer		1		4,727		18,162		15		765,143		587,362
Other		—		376		155		—		50,530		49,248
Total	$	65	$	17,211	$	39,117	$	2,333	$	2,413,403	$	2,052,626

(1) Loans collectively evaluated for impairment include $459.5 million of acquired loans which are presented net of unamortized purchase discounts of $12.1 million.

26

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by class of loans and by impairment evaluation method as of December 31, 2012:

	Allowance for Loan Losses						Loans
(Dollars in thousands)	Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Collectively Evaluated for Impairment		Purchased Credit- Impaired		Individually Evaluated for Impairment		Collectively Evaluated for Impairment (2)		Purchased Credit- Impaired
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	—	$	1,461	$	2,303	$	—	$	181,065	$	723,150
Other commercial C&D		—		1,810		10,901		—		55,967		360,002
Multifamily commercial real estate		—		129		219		—		27,078		57,760
1-4 family residential C&D		—		943		773		—		42,208		49,472
Total commercial real estate		—		4,343		14,196		—		306,318		1,190,384
Owner occupied commercial real estate		38		2,905		1,112		1,756		554,269		509,875
Commercial and industrial		—		5,920		1,570		—		454,575		210,932
Leasing		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		38		8,825		2,682		1,756		1,008,844		720,807
1-4 family residential		—		1,915		13,825		3,153		246,420		577,708
Home equity		—		376		8,294				284,097		146,790
Consumer		—		1,568		514		—		108,512		28,294
Total consumer		—		3,859		22,633		3,153		639,029		752,792
Other		—		377		309		—		40,480		60,651
Total	$	38	$	17,404	$	39,820	$	4,909	$	1,994,671	$	2,724,634

Troubled Debt Restructurings

If a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, the Bank may consider, in certain circumstances, modifying the terms of their loan to maximize collection of amounts due. A Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”) typically involves either a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the loan’s maturity date(s) with a stated rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, or in limited circumstances, a reduction of the principal balance of the loan or the loan’s accrued interest. Upon modification of a loan, the Bank measures the related impairment as the excess of the recorded investment in the loan over the discounted expected future cash flows. The present value of expected future cash flows is discounted at the loans effective interest rate. If the impairment analysis results in a loss, an allowance for loan losses is established for the loan. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, consumer loans modified in a TDR were nominal. Because of the immateriality of the amount and the nature of the modifications, the modifications did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or on the determination of the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2013. The Company did not have loans modified in a TDR during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

7. FDIC Indemnification Asset

The Company has recorded an indemnification asset related to loss share agreements entered into with the FDIC wherein the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain amounts related to certain acquired loans and other real estate owned should the Company experience a loss. Under the loss sharing arrangements, the FDIC has agreed to absorb 80% of all future losses and workout expenses on these assets which occur prior to the expiration of the loss sharing agreements. These agreements resulted from the purchase of the Failed Banks.

The loss sharing agreements consist of three (one for each Failed Bank) single-family shared-loss agreements and three (one for each Failed Bank) commercial and other loans shared-loss agreements. The single family shared-loss agreements provide for FDIC loss sharing and our reimbursement for recoveries to the FDIC for ten years from July 16, 2010 for single-family residential loans. The commercial shared-loss agreements provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years from July 16, 2010 and our reimbursement for recoveries to the FDIC for eight years from July 16, 2010 for all other covered assets.

27

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of the activity in the FDIC indemnification asset.

(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	49,417
Indemnification asset income		2,003
Amortization on indemnification asset		(5,782	)
Reimbursable losses claimed		(8,801	)
Balance, September 30, 2013	$	36,837
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	66,282
Indemnification asset income		7,850
Amortization on indemnification asset		(6,842	)
Reimbursable losses claimed		(10,746	)
Balance, September 30, 2012	$	56,544

8. Other Real Estate Owned

The activity within Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented in the table below. Ending balances for OREO covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $27.3 million and $39.6 million, respectively. Non-covered OREO ending balances as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $102.4 million and $105.0 million, respectively.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September  30, 2013			Three Months Ended September  30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012
Balance, beginning of period	$	142,793		$	158,235		$	154,093		$	168,781
Real estate acquired from borrowers		10,585			23,233			53,366			65,530
Valuation expense		(6,045	)		(8,633	)		(18,844	)		(15,529	)
(Loss) gain on sale of properties		(188	)		1,514			3,204			3,937
Properties sold and other		(17,491	)		(29,728	)		(62,165	)		(78,098	)
Balance, end of period	$	129,654		$	144,621		$	129,654		$	144,621

9. Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”).

The Bank has securities sold under agreements to repurchase with customers. These agreements are collateralized by investment securities issued by the United States Government or its agencies which are chosen by the Bank. The amounts outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $23.2 million and $41.5 million, respectively.

The Bank invests in FHLB stock for the purpose of establishing credit lines with the FHLB. The credit availability to the Bank is based on a percentage of the Bank’s total assets as reported on the most recent quarterly financial information submitted to the regulators subject to the pledging of sufficient collateral.

At September 30, 2013, in addition to $25.6 million in letters of credit issued by the FHLB, of which $25.2 million is used in lieu of pledging securities to the State of Florida, the Bank had $1.3 million in advances outstanding.

The advances as of September 30, 2013 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	Contractual Outstanding Amount		Maturity Date		Repricing Frequency		Contractual Rate at September 30, 2013
	$	760		November 2017		Fixed		0.50	%
		564		February 2026		Fixed		0.00	%
	$	1,324

28

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Bank’s collateral with the FHLB consists of a blanket floating lien pledge of the Bank’s residential 1-4 family mortgage, multifamily, home equity line of credit and commercial real estate secured loans. The amount of eligible collateral at September 30, 2013 provided for incremental borrowing availability of up to $190.1 million.

At December 31, 2012, in addition to $25.5 million in letters of credit of which $25.2 million is used in lieu of pledging securities to the State of Florida, the Bank had $1.5 million in advances outstanding.

The advances as of December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	Contractual Outstanding Amount		Maturity Date		Repricing Frequency	Contractual Rate at December 31, 2012
	$	867		November 2017	Fixed		0.50	%
		593		February 2026	Fixed		0.00	%
	$	1,460

10. Long Term Borrowings

Structured repurchase agreements

At September 30, 2013, outstanding structured repurchase agreements totaled $50.0 million of contractual amounts with carrying values of $53.7 million. These repurchase agreements have a weighted-average rate of 4.06% as of September 30, 2013 and are collateralized by $64.3 million of mortgage-backed securities.

(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying Amount		Contractual Amount		Maturity Date	Rate at September 30, 2013
$	10,894	$	10,000	November 6, 2016		4.75	%
	10,521		10,000	December 18, 2017		3.72	%
	10,896		10,000	March 30, 2017		4.50	%
	10,552		10,000	December 18, 2017		3.79	%
	10,816		10,000	March 22, 2019		3.56	%
$	53,679	$	50,000

At December 31, 2012, outstanding structured repurchase agreements totaled $50.0 million of contractual amounts with carrying values of $54.4 million. These repurchase agreements have a weighted-average rate of 4.06% as of December 31, 2012 and are collateralized by $66.5 million of mortgage-backed securities.

(Dollars in thousands)
Carrying Amount		Contractual Amount		Maturity Date	Rate at December 31, 2012
$	11,102	$	10,000	November 6, 2016		4.75	%
	10,608		10,000	December 18, 2017		3.72	%
	11,080		10,000	March 30, 2017		4.50	%
	10,644		10,000	December 18, 2017		3.79	%
	10,920		10,000	March 22, 2019		3.56	%
$	54,354	$	50,000

29

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Subordinated Debentures

Through its acquisitions of TIBB, CBKN, GRNB and SCMF, the Company assumed twelve separate pooled offerings of trust preferred securities. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts (variable interest entities), therefore the trusts are not consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but rather, the subordinated debentures are presented as liabilities.

The Trusts consist of wholly-owned statutory trust subsidiaries for the purpose of issuing the trust preferred securities. The Trusts used the proceeds from the issuance of trust preferred securities to acquire junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures of the Company. The trust preferred securities essentially mirror the debt securities, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend equal to the interest rate on the debt securities. The debt securities and the trust preferred securities each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred securities and the debt securities are callable by the companies or the Trust, at their respective option after a period of time outlined below, and at varying premiums and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”), if then required. Deferral of interest payments on the trust preferred securities is allowed for up to 60 months without being considered an event of default. On March 18, 2013, the Company called and redeemed $34.5 million of trust preferred securities issued by SCMF, which had a fixed interest rate of 7.95%. The prepayment resulted in a $0.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt. On September 7, 2013, the Company called and redeemed $8.0 million of trust preferred securities issued by TIBB, which had a fixed interest rate of 10.6%. The prepayment resulted in a $0.4 million gain on extinguishment of debt.

(Dollars in thousands)
Date of Offering	Original Face Amount		Carrying Amount September 30, 2013		Carrying Amount December 31, 2012		Interest Rate As of September 30, 2013	Call Date	Maturity Date
September 7, 2000	$	8,000	$	—	$	8,762	—	September 7, 2010	September 7, 2030
July 31, 2001		5,000		3,840		3,795	3.85% (3 Month LIBOR plus 358 basis points)	July 31, 2006	July 31, 2031
July 31, 2001		4,000		2,620		2,573	3.85% (3 Month LIBOR plus 358 basis points)	July 31, 2006	July 31, 2031
June 26, 2003		10,000		5,898		5,832	3.35% (3 Month LIBOR plus 310 basis points)	June 26, 2008	June 26, 2033
September 25, 2003		10,000		6,331		6,222	3.12% (3 Month LIBOR plus 285 basis points)	September 25, 2008	September 25, 2033
November 10, 2003		34,500		—		34,189	—	November 10, 2008	December 31, 2033
December 30, 2003		10,000		5,681		5,614	3.12% (3 Month LIBOR plus 285 basis points)	December 30, 2008	December 30, 2033
June 28, 2005		3,000		1,533		1,497	1.93% (3 Month LIBOR plus 168 basis points)	June 28, 2010	June 28, 2035
December 22, 2005		10,000		4,463		4,383	1.65% (3 Month LIBOR plus 140 basis points)	December 22, 2010	March 15, 2036
December 28, 2005		13,000		6,407		6,255	1.79% (3 Month LIBOR plus 154 basis points)	December 28, 2010	March 15, 2036
June 23, 2006		20,000		11,137		10,918	1.82% (3 Month LIBOR plus 155 basis points)	June 23, 2011	July 7, 2036
May 16, 2007		56,000		27,840		27,220	1.90% (3 Month LIBOR plus 165 basis points)	May 16, 2012	May 16, 2037
June 15, 2007		10,000		5,302		5,243	1.69% (3 Month LIBOR plus 143 basis points)	June 15, 2012	September 6, 2037
	$	193,500	$	81,052	$	122,503

Other Subordinated Debentures

Through the acquisition of CBKN, the Company assumed $3.4 million in aggregate principal amount of subordinated promissory notes with a fixed interest rate of 10.0% due March 18, 2020. The notes had a carrying value of $3.6 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company may prepay the Notes at any time after March 18, 2015 subject to regulatory approval and compliance with applicable law. The Company’s obligation to repay the notes is subordinate to all indebtedness owed by the Company to its current and future secured creditors and general creditors and certain other financial obligations of the Company.

30

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

At September 30, 2013, the maturities of long-term borrowings were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Fixed Rate		Floating Rate		Total
Due in 2014 through 2015	$	—	$	—	$	—
Due in 2016		10,894		—		10,894
Due in 2017		31,969		—		31,969
Due in 2018		—		—		—
Thereafter		14,375		81,052		95,427
Total long-term debt	$	57,238	$	81,052	$	138,290

31

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

At December 31, 2012, the maturities of long-term borrowings were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Fixed Rate		Floating Rate		Total
Due in 2013 through 2015	$	—	$	—	$	—
Due in 2016		11,102		—		11,102
Due in 2017		32,332		—		32,332
Thereafter		57,444		79,552		136,996
Total long-term debt	$	100,878	$	79,552	$	180,430

11. Shareholders’ Equity and Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements results in certain discretionary and required actions by regulators that could have an effect on the Company’s operations. The regulations require the Company and the Bank to meet specific capital adequacy guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

To be considered well capitalized or adequately capitalized as defined under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must maintain minimum Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 Risk-based, and Total Risk-based ratios. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Bank maintained capital ratios exceeding the requirement to be considered well capitalized. These minimum ratios along with the actual ratios for the Company and the Bank as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are presented in the following tables.

(Dollars in thousands)	Well Capitalized Requirement					Adequately Capitalized Requirement					Actual
September 30, 2013	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Consolidated		N/A		N/A		³	$256,831	³	4.0	%	$	928,770		14.5	%
Capital Bank, NA	³	$321,016	³	5.0	%	³	256,813	³	4.0	%		820,704		12.8	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated		N/A		N/A		³	$188,340	³	4.0	%	$	928,770		19.7	%
Capital Bank, NA	³	$282,524	³	6.0	%	³	188,350	³	4.0	%		820,704		17.4	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated		N/A		N/A		³	$376,679	³	8.0	%	$	989,088		21.0	%
Capital Bank, NA	³	$470,874	³	10.0	%	³	376,699	³	8.0	%		880,856		18.7	%

(Dollars in thousands)	Well Capitalized Requirement					Adequately Capitalized Requirement					Actual
December 31, 2012	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Consolidated		N/A		N/A		³	$282,575	³	4.0	%	$	964,309		13.7	%
Capital Bank, NA	³	$353,323	³	5.0	%	³	282,659	³	4.0	%		850,472		12.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated		N/A		N/A		³	$193,640	³	4.0	%	$	964,309		19.9	%
Capital Bank, NA	³	$290,349	³	6.0	%	³	193,566	³	4.0	%		850,472		17.6	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated		N/A		N/A		³	$387,281	³	8.0	%	$	1,025,545		21.2	%
Capital Bank, NA	³	$483,915	³	10.0	%	³	387,132	³	8.0	%		911,528		18.8	%

32

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In August 2010, Capital Bank, NA entered into an Operating Agreement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC Operating Agreement”). At present, the OCC Operating Agreement requires Capital Bank, NA to maintain total capital equal to at least 12% of risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital equal to at least 11% of risk-weighted assets and a minimum leverage ratio of 10% (Tier 1 Capital ratio).

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company and the Bank met all capital requirements to which they were subject. Tier 1 Capital for the Company includes trust preferred securities to the extent allowable.

Currently, the OCC Operating Agreement with Capital Bank, NA prohibited the Bank from paying a dividend for three years following the July 16, 2010 initial acquisition date. The agreement imposes other restrictions on Capital Bank, NA’s ability to pay dividends including requiring prior approval from the OCC before any distribution is made. On September 5, 2013, the OCC approved a dividend of $105.0 million to the Company by its subsidiary Capital Bank N.A.

Dividends that may be paid by a national bank are limited to that bank’s retained net profits for the preceding two years plus retained net profits up to the date of any dividend declaration in the current calendar year.

Share Repurchases

On February 5, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock. Stock repurchases may be made from time to time, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The approved stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of shares, and the program may be extended, modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company repurchased $50.0 million, or 2,839 common shares at an average price of $17.60 per share, completing the aforementioned stock repurchase plan.

On September 16, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100.0 million of the Company’s common stock. Stock repurchases may be made from time to time, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The approved stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of shares, and the program may be extended, modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company repurchased $12.9 million, or 600 common shares at an average price of $21.50 per share. The Company accounts for treasury stock using the cost method as a reduction of shareholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.

12. Stock-Based Compensation

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had two compensation plans, the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) and the 2013 Omnibus Compensation Plan (the “2013 Plan”) under which shares of its common stock are issuable in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock awards, stock bonus awards and other incentive awards.

The 2010 Plan was effective December 22, 2009. The maximum number of shares of common stock of the Company that could have been optioned or awarded was 5,750 shares (limited to 10% of outstanding shares of common stock) of which up to 70% could have been granted pursuant to stock options and up to 30% could have been granted pursuant to restricted stock and restricted stock units. The 2010 Plan was replaced by the 2013 Plan and no further awards may be made pursuant to the 2010 Plan. Pursuant to the merger agreements, upon the June 2012 merger of TIBB, GRNB and CBKN with and into CBF, outstanding options to acquire TIBB, GRNB and CBKN stock automatically converted into options to purchase the Company’s stock as determined by the conversion ratio specified in the merger agreements, subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the mergers. The remaining 16 options that were formerly options to acquire TIBB, GRNB and CBKN stock have exercise prices ranging from $28.44 to $2,026.00 per share of the company common stock.

The 2013 Plan was effective May 22, 2013 and expires on May 22, 2023, the tenth anniversary of the effective date. The maximum number of shares of common stock of the Company that may be optioned or awarded is 2,639 shares. Awards under this plan may be made to any person selected by the Committee. No options or awards were granted under this plan during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The following table summarizes the components and classification of stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013		Three Months Ended September 30, 2012		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Stock options	$	215	$	1,867	$	395	$	8,017
Restricted stock		1,156		2,375		3,917		6,910
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	1,371	$	4,242	$	4,312	$	14,927
Salaries and employee benefits	$	1,371	$	3,907	$	4,312	$	13,930
Other expense		—		335		—		997
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	1,371	$	4,242	$	4,312	$	14,927

33

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense arising from restricted stock awards and non-qualified stock options was approximately $0.5 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $1.7 million and $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock Options

Under the 2010 Plan, the exercise price for common stock must equal at least 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the day an option is granted. The exercise price under an incentive stock option granted to a person owning stock representing more than 10% of the common stock must equal at least 110% of the fair market value at the date of grant, and such option is not exercisable after five years from the date the incentive stock option was granted. The Board of Directors may, at its discretion, provide that an option not be exercised in whole or in part for any period or periods of time as specified in the option agreements. No option may be exercised after the expiration of ten years from the date it is granted. Stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 vest over average service periods of approximately 2 years and 6 months, respectively

The following table lists the various stock option grants from our 2010 Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

(Shares in thousands)
Stock Option Grant	Number of Options Granted		Exercise Price		Fair Value
May 21, 2013—Employees		264	$	18.0		6.52
January 12, 2012—Employees		628	$	20.0		8.05

The fair value of each option is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. This model requires the input of subjective assumptions that will usually have a significant impact on the fair value estimate. The assumptions for the grants were developed based on ASC 718 and SEC guidance contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, “Share-Based Payment.”

The following table summarizes the weighted average assumptions used to compute the grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Nine Months Ended September  30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012
Dividend yield		0.00	%		0.00	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.016	%		0.91	%
Expected option life		5.75 years			5.25 years
Volatility		37	%		45	%
Weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted	$	6.52		$	8.05

• The dividend yield assumption is consistent with management expectations of dividend distributions based upon the Company’s business plan. An increase in dividend yield will decrease stock compensation expense.

• The risk-free interest rate was developed using the U.S. Treasury yield curve for a period equal to the expected life of the options on the grant date. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase stock compensation expense.

• The expected option life for the current period grants was estimated using the vesting period, the term of the option and estimates of future exercise behavior patterns. An increase in the option life will increase stock compensation expense.

• The volatility was estimated using a peer group assessment for periods approximating the expected option life. Appropriate weight is attributed to financial theory, according to which the volatility of an institution’s equity should be related to the volatility of its assets and the entity’s financial leverage. An increase in the volatility will increase stock compensation expense.

ASC 718 requires the recognition of stock-based compensation for the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, stock based compensation expense was recorded based upon assumptions that the Company would experience no forfeitures. This assumption of forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods based on historical forfeiture rates and may change based on new facts and circumstances. Any changes in assumptions will be accounted for prospectively in the period of change.

34

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

(Shares in thousands)	2013				2012
(Shares in thousands)	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
Balance, January 1,		2,890	$	21.39		2,236	$	20.00
Granted		264		18.00		628		20.00
Exercised		—		—		—		—
Expired or forfeited		21		113.80		—		—
Balance, September 30,		3,133	$	20.50		2,864	$	20.00

The weighted average remaining term for outstanding stock options was approximately 7 years at September 30, 2013. The aggregate intrinsic value at September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $6.6 million and $0 for stock options outstanding. The aggregate intrinsic value at September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $5.6 million and $0 for stock options exercisable. The intrinsic value for stock options is calculated based on the exercise price of the underlying awards and the market price of the Company’s common stock as of the reporting date. There were 2,879 and 1,432 options exercisable at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Options outstanding at September 30, 2013 were as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	Outstanding Options						Exercisable Options
Range of Exercise Prices	Number		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Number		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$18.00		253		9.64 years	$	18.00		—		—
$20.00		2,864		6.68 years		20.00		2,864	$	20.00
$28.44 - $2,026.00		16		3.89 years		153.63		15		159.68
$18.0 - $2,026.00		3,133		6.91 years	$	20.50		2,879	$	20.71

Options outstanding at December 31, 2012 were as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	Outstanding Options						Exercisable Options
Range of Exercise Prices	Number		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Number		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$20.00		2,864		7.42 years	$	20.00		2,550	$	20.00
$28.44 - $2,026.00		26		3.65 years		174.50		25		178.71
$20.00 - $2,026.00		2,890		7.39 years	$	21.39		2,575	$	21.55

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock provides the grantee with voting, dividend and anti-dilution rights equivalent to common shareholders, but is restricted from transfer until vested, at which time all restrictions are removed. Vesting for restricted shares granted to employees is based upon the performance of the Company’s common stock. The terms of the restricted stock awards granted to employees during 2012 provide for vesting upon the achievement of stock price goals as follows: (1) 33% at $25.00 per share; (2) 33% at $28.00 per share; and (3) 33% at $32.00 per share. Achievement of stock price goals is generally defined as the average closing price of the shares for any consecutive 30-day trading period exceeding the applicable price target.

35

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table lists the various restricted stock awards under our 2010 Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

(Shares in thousands)
Date of Award	Number of Restricted  Stock Awards		Price Per Share
May 21, 2013—Employees		4	$	18.00
January 1, 2012—Employees		307	$	19.84

36

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The fair value of each restricted stock award granted to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was estimated to be equal to the closing stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of each restricted stock award granted to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was estimated as of the date of grant using a Monte Carlo approach based on Geometric Brownian Motion that simulated daily stock prices and the related consecutive 30 day average of the simulated stock price over a period of 10 years. The model projected the Company’s fair value of each vesting tranche of the restricted stock award from the mean or expected value from the 100,000 scenarios used.

The model described above requires the input of subjective assumptions that will usually have a significant impact on the fair value estimate. The following table summarizes the weighted average assumptions used to compute the grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Grant date fair value of shares	$	18.00	$	19.84
Risk-free interest rate		Forward Treasury Curve		Forward Treasury Curve
Market risk premium		N/A		0.00	%
Volatility		N/A		45.00	%
Annual forfeiture estimate		N/A		0.00	%
Weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards granted	$	18.00	$	18.01

• The risk-free interest rate was developed using the U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected life of the options on the grant date. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase stock compensation expense.

• The volatility was estimated using a peer group assessment for periods approximating the expected option life. Appropriate weight is attributed to financial theory, according to which the volatility of an institution’s equity should be related to the volatility of its assets and the entity’s financial leverage. An increase in the volatility will increase stock compensation expense.

• An increase in the annual forfeiture estimate will decrease stock compensation expense.

The value of the restricted stock is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the implied service periods.

The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

(Shares in thousands)	2013				2012
	Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share		Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
Balance, January 1,		1,212	$	14.27		967	$	13.26
Granted		4		18.00		307		18.01
Vested		—		—		—		—
Expired or forfeited		—		—		—		—
Balance, September 30,		1,216	$	14.28		1,274	$	14.40

37

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

13. Income Taxes

A reconciliation of income tax computed at applicable Federal statutory income tax rates to total income tax expense reported is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September  30, 2013			Three Months Ended September  30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September  30, 2012
Pretax income from continuing operations	$	20,419		$	5,460		$	46,736		$	25,808
Income taxes computed at Federal statutory tax rate		7,147			1,911			16,358			9,033
Effect of:
State taxes (net of federal benefit)		784			214			1,795			1,012
State statutory rate change		1,545			—			1,545			—
Change in estimate of deductible loan losses		—			(33,975	)		—			(33,975	)
CVR adjustment		(301	)		—			1,156			—
Other, net		(200	)		(535	)		(756	)		(643	)
Total income tax expense	$	8,975		$	(32,385	)	$	20,098		$	(24,573	)

The net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $177.9 million and $183.2 million, respectively. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considered the following positive factors: projections of future operating results which forecast that the Company will continue to recognize pre-tax income on a consolidated basis; reductions in operating expenses have been achieved as evidenced by continued progress in reducing compensation expense, occupancy costs, and OREO expenses; the Company expects interest rates to rise in the future, which should have a favorable impact on our net interest income trend and overall return on assets. A negative factor that management considered was the significant losses incurred by the acquired institutions as a result of the severe recession and significant decline in real estate values in their local markets. In addition, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limits the ability of the Company to utilize net operating losses and deduct built in losses for income tax purposes. The Company appropriately considers these limitations and has taken into account such limitations in calculating the amount of the recorded net deferred tax assets. These factors represent the most significant positive and negative evidence that management considered in concluding that no valuation allowance was necessary at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The Company uses the estimated annual effective tax rate method in computing its interim tax provision. Certain items, including, those deemed to be unusual, infrequent or which cannot be reliably estimated, are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. In these cases, the actual tax expense or benefit applicable to that item is treated discretely, and is reported in the same period as the related item. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the change in value of the CVR and related expense resulted from the overall improvement in our most recent estimates of cash flows, substantially related to the Company’s legacy GreenBankshares and Southern Community portfolios. This expense is not deductible for income tax purposes and was treated discretely as described above.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had $94.1 million and $98.2 million of gross Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, respectively, which begin to expire after 2029 if unused and are subject to an annual limitation of $10.9 million.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax of the states of Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, a new North Carolina law was enacted which reduces the North Carolina income tax rate to 6% in 2014 and 5% in 2015. Under GAAP rules, the effects of a change in tax law or rates must be recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. As such, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded a $1.6 million charge to income tax expense as a result of the reduction in blended tax rate that caused the Company to revalue its deferred tax assets.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions.

38

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

14. Fair Value

FASB guidance on fair value measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires fair value disclosures for certain assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis.

This guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

This guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements to maximize the use of observable inputs, that is, inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity can access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Cash & cash equivalents

For cash & cash equivalents, the carrying value is primarily utilized as a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Derivative financial instruments

Fair values for interest rate swaps, foreign exchange contracts, option agreements, forward loan sales agreements and interest rate caps are based upon the amounts required to settle the contracts. Fair values for commitments to originate loans held for sale are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. Fair values for fixed-rate commitments also consider the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

Valuation of Investment Securities

The fair values of available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, and trading securities are determined by: 1) obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges when available (Level 1 inputs); 2) matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the financial markets to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs); and 3) for collateralized debt obligations and certain corporate debt securities that are not actively traded, custom discounted cash flow modeling (Level 3 inputs).

As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned a collateralized debt security where the underlying collateral is comprised primarily of trust preferred securities of banks and insurance companies and certain corporate debt securities which are not actively traded. The inputs used in determining the estimated fair value of these securities are Level 3 inputs. In determining their estimated fair value, management utilizes a discounted cash flow modeling valuation approach. Discount rates utilized in the modeling of these securities are estimated based upon a variety of factors including the market yields of publicly traded trust preferred securities of larger financial institutions and other non-investment grade corporate debt. Additionally, cash flows utilized in the modeling of the collateralized debt obligation security were based upon actual default history of the underlying issuers and issuer specific assumptions of estimated future defaults of the underlying issuers.

As of September 30, 2013, Capital Bank held industrial revenue bonds which are floating rate issues. Since there is no active secondary market for the trading of the bonds, the Company has developed a model to estimate fair value. This model determines an appropriate discount rate for the bonds based on current market rates for liquid corporate bonds with an equivalent credit rating plus an estimated illiquidity factor, and calculates the present value of expected future cash flows using this discount rate.

Valuation of Impaired Loans and Other Real Estate Owned

The fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses and other real estate owned is generally based on recent real estate appraisals and other available observable market information. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The Company generally uses independent external appraisers in this process who routinely make adjustments to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. The Company’s policy is to update appraisals, at a minimum, annually for classified assets, which include collateral dependent loans and OREO. We consider appraisals dated within the past 12 months to be current and do not typically make adjustments to such appraisals.

39

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In the Company’s process for reviewing third-party prepared appraisals, any differences of opinion on values, assumptions or adjustments to comparable sales data are typically reconciled directly with the independent appraiser prior to acceptance of the final appraisal.

Sensitivity to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs

As discussed above, the Company owned a collateralized debt security, corporate bonds, and an Industrial Revenue bond which require recurring fair value estimates categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of these securities are incorporated in the discounted cash flow modeling valuation. Rates utilized in the modeling of these securities are estimated based upon a variety of factors including the market yields of publicly traded trust preferred securities of larger financial institutions and other non-investment grade corporate debt. Cash flows utilized in the modeling of the collateralized debt security were based upon actual default history of the underlying issuers and issuer specific assumptions of estimated future defaults of the underlying issuers. Significant changes in any inputs in isolation would result in significantly different fair value estimates.

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below as of September 30, 2013:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Trading securities	$	6,091	$	6,091	$	—	$	—
Available for sale securities:
Asset-backed securities		137,961		—		137,961		—
Mortgage-backed securities—residential		574,401		—		574,401		—
Industrial revenue bonds		3,965		—		—		3,965
Marketable equity securities		946		946		—		—
Collateralized debt obligations		329		—		—		329
Available for sale securities	$	717,602	$	946	$	712,362	$	4,294
Gross asset value of derivatives	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Liabilities
Gross liability value of derivatives	$	1,103	$	—	$	1,103	$	—

There were no transfers of assets and liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

40

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below as of December 31, 2012:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Government agencies	$	8,015	$	—	$	8,015	$	—
States and political subdivisions—tax exempt		17,215		—		17,215		—
States and political subdivisions—taxable		573		—		573		—
Mortgage-backed securities—residential		973,853		—		973,853		—
Industrial revenue bonds		3,800		—		—		3,800
Marketable equity securities		2,719		2,719		—		—
Corporate bonds		26		—		—		26
Trust preferred securities		246		246		—		—
Collateralized debt obligations		297		—		—		297
Available for sale securities	$	1,006,744	$	2,965	$	999,656	$	4,123
Gross asset value of derivatives	$	880	$	—	$	880	$	—
Liabilities
Gross liability value of derivatives	$	1,024	$	—	$	1,024	$	—

41

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The table below presents reconciliations and income statement classifications of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and held at September 30, 2013.

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)	Corporate Bonds		Industrial Revenue Bonds		Collateralized Debt Obligations
Beginning balance, June 30, 2013	$	—	$	3,872	$	301
Included in earnings—other than temporary impairment		—		—		—
Included in earnings—gain on sale		—		—		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—		93		28
Sales		—		—		—
Transfer in to Level 3		—		—		—
Ending balance September 30, 2013	$	—	$	3,965	$	329

The table below presents reconciliations and income statement classifications of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and held at September 30, 2013.

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)	Corporate Bonds			Industrial Revenue Bonds		Collateralized Debt Obligations
Beginning balance, January 1, 2013	$	26		$	3,800	$	297
Included in earnings—other than temporary impairment		—			—		—
Included in earnings—gain on sale		199			—		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			165		32
Sales		(225	)		—		—
Transfer in to Level 3		—			—		—
Ending balance September 30, 2013	$	—		$	3,965	$	329

The table below presents reconciliations and income statement classifications of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and held at September 30, 2012.

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)	Corporate Bonds			Industrial Revenue Bonds		Collateralized Debt Obligations
Beginning balance, June 30, 2012	$	752		$	3,750	$	247
Included in earnings—other than temporary impairment		—			—		—
Included in earnings—gain on sale		—			—		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—		41
Sales		(726	)		—		—
Transfer in to Level 3		—			—		—
Ending balance September 30, 2012	$	26		$	3,750	$	288

42

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The table below presents reconciliations and income statement classifications of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and held at September 30, 2012.

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)	Corporate Bonds			Industrial Revenue Bonds		Collateralized Debt Obligations
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012	$	790		$	3,750	$	328
Included in earnings—other than temporary impairment		(38	)		—		—
Included in earnings—gain on sale		—			—		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—		42
Sales		(726	)		—		(82	)
Transfer in to Level 3		—			—		—
Ending balance September 30, 2012	$	26		$	3,750	$	288

Quantitative Information about Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value at September 30, 2013		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Input	Range
Industrial revenue bonds	$	3,965	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	3.6-3.7%
				Illiquidity factor	0.5%
Collateralized debt obligations	$	329	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	Libor +10.75% and +13%
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value at December 31, 2012		Valuation Technique(s)	Significant Unobservable Input	Range
Corporate bonds	$	26	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	20%
				Default probability	95%
Industrial revenue bond	$	3,800	Discounted cash flow	Current yield/discount rate	1.6-1.7%
				Illiquidity factor	0.3%
Collateralized debt obligations	$	297	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	Libor +10.75% and +13%

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis

Valuation of Impaired Loans and Other Real Estate Owned

The fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses and other real estate owned is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

43

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below as of September 30, 2013:

	Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Other real estate owned	$	—	$	—	$	100,031
Other repossessed assets		—		132		—

Other real estate owned measured at fair value as of September 30, 2013 had a carrying amount of $124.6 million, less a valuation allowance of $24.6 million. Other repossessed assets are primarily comprised of repossessed vehicles and equipment and are measured at fair value as of the date of repossession.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below as of December 31, 2012:

	Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Other real estate owned	$	—	$	—	$	85,645
Other repossessed assets		—		268		—

Other real estate owned measured at fair value as of December 31, 2012 had a carrying amount of $101.7 million, less a valuation allowance of $16.1 million. Other repossessed assets are primarily comprised of repossessed vehicles and equipment and are measured at fair value as of the date of repossession.

Quantitative Information about Nonrecurring Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value at September 30, 2013		Valuation Technique(s)		Significant Unobservable Input	Range
OREO	$	100,031		Fair value of property	Appraised value less costs to sell		7% - 10%
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value at December 31, 2012		Valuation Technique(s)		Significant Unobservable Input	Range
OREO	$	85,645		Fair value of property	Appraised value less costs to sell		7% - 10%

44

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows:

	Fair Value Measurement
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
September 30, 2013
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	163,704	$	163,704	$	163,704	$	—	$	—
Trading securities		6,091		6,091		6,091		—		—
Investment securities available-for-sale		717,602		717,602		946		712,362		4,294
Investment securities held-to-maturity		482,986		483,413		—		483,413		—
Loans, net		4,420,887		4,619,163		—		8,918		4,610,245
Receivable from FDIC		8,439		8,439		—		8,439		—
Indemnification asset		36,837		36,837		—		—		36,837
Federal Reserve, Federal Home Loan Bank and Independent Bankers’ Bank Stock		40,195		40,195		—		—		40,195
Gross asset value of derivatives		—		—		—		—		—
Total financial assets	$	5,876,741	$	6,075,444	$	170,741	$	1,213,132	$	4,691,571
Financial Liabilities
Noncontractual deposits	$	3,688,697	$	3,688,697	$	—	$	—	$	3,688,697
Contractual deposits		1,579,772		1,572,723		—		—		1,572,723
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,324		1,246		—		1,246		—
Short-term borrowings		23,224		23,224		—		23,224		—
Long-term borrowings		53,679		56,387		—		—		56,387
Subordinated debentures		84,611		90,898		—		—		90,898
Gross liability value of derivatives		1,103		1,103		—		1,103		—
Total financial liabilities	$	5,432,410	$	5,434,278	$	—	$	25,573	$	5,408,705
December 31, 2012
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	734,874	$	734,874	$	734,874	$	—	$	—
Investment securities available-for-sale		1,006,744		1,006,744		2,965		999,656		4,123
Loans, net		4,678,228		4,962,495		—		11,276		4,951,219
Receivable from FDIC		8,486		8,486		—		8,486		—
Indemnification asset		49,417		49,417		—		—		49,417
Federal Reserve, Federal Home Loan Bank and Independent Bankers’ Bank Stock		39,217		39,217		—		—		39,217
Gross asset value of derivatives		880		880		—		880		—
Total financial assets	$	6,517,846	$	6,802,113	$	737,839	$	1,020,298	$	5,043,976
Financial Liabilities
Noncontractual deposits	$	3,802,170	$	3,802,170	$	—	$	—	$	3,802,170
Contractual deposits		2,070,698		2,075,342		—		—		2,075,954
Federal home loan bank advances		1,460		1,401		—		1,401		—
Short-term borrowings		41,508		41,507		—		41,507		—
Long-term borrowings		54,354		58,983		—		—		58,983
Subordinated debentures		126,076		124,798		—		—		124,798
Gross liability value of derivatives		412		412		—		412		—
Total financial liabilities	$	6,096,678	$	6,104,613	$	—	$	43,932	$	6,061,905

45

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, receivable from FDIC, derivatives, noncontractual demand deposits and certain short-term borrowings. As it is not practicable to determine the fair value of the indemnification asset, Federal Reserve, Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other bankers’ bank stocks due to restrictions placed on transferability, the estimated fair value is equal to their carrying amount. Security fair values are based on market prices or dealer quotes, and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security and information about the issuer including estimates of discounted cash flows when necessary. For fixed rate loans or contractual deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life, adjusted for expected credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values. Fair value of long-term debt is based on current rates for similar financing.

The fair value of off-balance sheet items that includes commitments to extend credit to fund commercial, consumer, real estate construction and real estate-mortgage loans and to fund standby letters of credit is considered nominal.

15. Derivative Instruments

The Company has stand-alone derivative financial instruments which it acquired in its purchase of Southern Community, primarily in the form of interest rate swaps, foreign exchange contracts, option agreements, and interest rate caps. The forward loan sales contracts are derived from recourse loans. These transactions involve both credit and market risk.

The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. None of the derivatives held are designated as hedging instruments or otherwise qualify for hedge accounting treatment and all changes in fair value are recognized in non-interest income or non-interest expense during the period of change. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the company recorded $(0.3) million and $(0.7) million, respectively, in non-interest income and $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in non-interest expense as a result of changes in fair value.

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to these agreements. The Company controls the credit risk of its financial contracts through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures and agreements that specify collateral levels to be maintained by the Company and the counterparties. These collateral levels are based on the credit rating of the counterparties.

The Company’s derivative instrument contracts which are recorded in other assets and other liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet consist of the following:

	September 30, 2013					December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value			Notional Amount		Fair Value			Notional Amount
Assets:
Interest rate swaps associated with certificates of deposits (maturing in 2040)	$	—		$	—	$	682		$	25,000
Interest rate cap contracts (maturing in 2014)		—			12,500		—			12,500
Interest rate swaps associated with loan contracts (maturing in 2014)		—			—		132			2,366
Currency exchange contracts (maturing in 2013)		—			—		66			7,745
Forward loan sales contracts (maturing in 2013)		—			—		—			—
	$	—		$	12,500	$	880		$	47,611
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps associated with certificates of deposits (maturing in 2040)	$	(845	)	$	25,000	$
Interest rate swaps associated with loan contracts (maturing in 2014)		—			—		(132	)		2,366
Currency exchange contracts (maturing in 2013)		(116	)		10,000		(280	)		10,000
Forward loan sales contracts (maturing in 2013)		(142	)		11,145		—			—
	$	(1,103	)	$	46,145	$	(412	)	$	12,366

46

Capital Bank Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The primary objective for each of these contracts is to minimize risk. Interest rate risk being the primary risk for the interest rate caps, swaps and forward loan sales contracts. Foreign exchange currency fluctuation risk is the primary risk for the foreign exchange contracts. The interest rate on the underlying $10.0 million certificates of deposit is based on a proprietary index (Barclays Intelligent Carry Index USD ER) managed by the counterparty (Barclays Bank). The currency exchange contracts are also based on this proprietary index. Forward loan sales contracts had a de minimis value as of December 31, 2012.

47

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain of the matters discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and as such may involve known and unknown risk, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results described in such forward-looking statements. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believes,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “predicts,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “estimate,” “plans,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “intends” and similar words or phrases. Actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: market and economic conditions, the management of our growth, the risks associated with Capital Bank, NA’s loan portfolio and real estate holdings, local economic conditions affecting retail and commercial real estate, the Company’s geographic concentration in the southeastern region of the United States, restrictions imposed by Capital Bank, NA’s loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, the assumptions and judgments required by loss share accounting and the acquisition method of accounting, competition within the industry, dependence on key personnel, government legislation and regulation, the risks associated with identification, completion and integration of any future acquisitions, and risks related to Capital Bank, NA’s technology and information systems. Additional factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Our financial information is prepared in accordance with GAAP. Application of these principles requires management to make complex and subjective estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the following discussion and in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. For more information on our accounting policies and estimates, refer to Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

The following discussion addresses the factors that have affected the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as reflected in the unaudited consolidated statement of condition as of September 30, 2013 and statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and comparative periods when appropriate . Except as otherwise noted, dollar amounts in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are not in thousands.

The following discussion pertains to our historical results, which includes the operations of First National Bank, Metro Bank, Turnberry Bank (collectively, the “Failed Banks”), TIB Financial, Capital Bank Corp., Green Bankshares and Southern Community Financial subsequent to our acquisition of each such entity. Throughout this discussion we collectively refer to the above acquisitions as the “acquisitions”.

Overview

We are a bank holding company incorporated in late 2009 with the goal of creating a regional banking franchise in the southeastern region of the United States through organic growth and acquisitions of other banks, including failed, underperforming and undercapitalized banks. We have raised approximately $1.0 billion to make acquisitions through a series of private placements and an initial public offering of our common stock. Since inception, we have acquired seven depository institutions, including the assets and certain deposits of the three Failed Banks from the FDIC. We operate 163 branches in Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. Through our branches, we offer a wide range of commercial and consumer loans and deposits, as well as ancillary financial services.

We were founded by a group of experienced bankers with a multi-decade record of leading, operating, acquiring and integrating financial institutions. Our executive management team is led by our Chief Executive Officer, R. Eugene Taylor. Mr. Taylor is the former Vice Chairman of Bank of America Corp., where his career spanned 38 years, including tenure as President of the Consumer and Commercial Bank. He also has extensive experience executing and overseeing bank acquisitions, including NationsBank Corp.’s acquisition and integration of Bank of America, Maryland National Bank and Barnett Banks, Inc. Our Chief Financial Officer, Christopher G. Marshall, has over 30 years of financial and managerial experience, including service as the Chief Financial Officer of Fifth Third Bancorp and as the Chief Operations Executive for Bank of America’s Global Consumer and Small Business Bank. Our Chief Risk Officer, R. Bruce Singletary, has over 32 years of experience, including 19 years of experience managing credit risk. He has served as Head of Credit for NationsBank Corp. for the Mid-Atlantic region and as Senior Risk Manager for commercial banking for Bank of America’s Florida Bank. Kenneth A. Posner serves as our Chief of Investment Analytics and Investor Relations Executive and spent 13 years as an equity research analyst at Morgan Stanley focusing on a wide range of financial services firms.

48

Acquisitions

In September 2012, our majority owned subsidiaries, TIB Financial Corp. (“TIBB”), Green Bankshares Inc. (“GRNB”) and Capital Bank Corporation (“CBKN”), merged with and into Capital Bank Financial Corp. with CBF continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Reorganization”). Upon completion of the Reorganization, the outstanding common shares held by the minority shareholders were converted into an aggregate of 3.7 million shares of CBF’s Class A common stock.

On October 1, 2012, we acquired all of the common equity interest in Southern Community Financial Corporation (“SCMF”), a publicly held bank holding company headquartered in Winston Salem, North Carolina. The merger consideration for all of the common equity interest consisted of approximately $52.4 million in cash paid to Southern Community’s shareholders and approximately $46.9 million in cash paid to the Treasury for preferred stock issued to the Treasury as part of TARP. This acquisition expanded our presence in the North Carolina markets.

The initial estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of SCMF were based on the information that was available at the time. During the third quarter of 2013, CBF concluded that certain measurement period adjustments were appropriate, particularly as the underlying asset quality in the SCMF loan portfolio is expected to produce better credit performance than originally anticipated based on facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. As required by the acquisition method of accounting, the Company retrospectively adjusted the acquisition date balance sheet and the results of operations of the fourth quarter of 2012 and first two quarters of 2013 to reflect the impact of the measurement period adjustments. Further discussion and the impact on the financial statements is included in Note 3 Business Combinations and Acquisitions.

Comparability to Past Periods

The consolidated financial information presented throughout this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 includes our consolidated results, including SCMF. Accordingly, operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are not generally comparable. Results of operations for these periods reflect, among other things, the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were initially recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair values as of the dates of acquisition. These estimated fair values differed substantially from the carrying amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed immediately prior to acquisition. Additionally, certain adjustments were made in the third quarter of 2013 in regard to the fair values assigned in the acquisition of SCMF as further described above.

Primary Factors Used to Evaluate Our Business

As a financial institution, we manage and evaluate various aspects of both our results of operations and our financial condition. We evaluate the levels and trends of the line items included in our balance sheet and income statement, as well as various financial ratios that are commonly used in our industry. We analyze these ratios and financial trends against our budgeted performance and the financial condition and performance of comparable financial institutions in our region and nationally. For a full description of income statement metrics and balance sheet drivers used to evaluate our business such as, Net Interest Income, Provision for Loan Losses, Non-Interest Income, Non-Interest Expense, Net Income, Loan Growth, Asset Quality, Deposit Growth, Liquidity and Capital , refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

Quarterly Summary

For the third quarter of 2013, we had net income of $11.4 million, or $0.22 per basic and diluted share. Results for the quarter included $1.1 million of stock-based compensation associated with original founder awards, $0.8 million of income from the reduction of contingent value right (“CVR”) expected payouts, a $0.4 million gain on extinguishment of debt related to $8.0 million in prepayments of trust preferred securities, $0.1 million loss on investment securities, and a tax adjustment of $1.6 million associated with changes in certain statutory rates that were enacted into law during the quarter, which are effective in future years.

Operating and financial highlights include the following:

• Loan originations of $291.3 million;

• Total cost of deposits declined by five basis points to 0.38%;

• Net interest margin increased by 13 basis points to 4.45% driven by additional accretion on purchased credit impaired loans, decline in average balances and rates in time deposits, and the reduction in high coupon trust preferred debt pre-paid in the third quarter;

• Problem loan resolutions of $79.0 million;

• Tier 1 leverage ratio of 14.5% as of September 30, 2013;

• ROA and ROE increased to 0.69% and 4.12%, respectively.

• Repurchased 600,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $21.50;

• Recorded Southern Community Financial Corporation measurement period adjustments, which increased acquisition date estimated fair values of loans, CVR and other liabilities by $43.2 million and $11.7 million, respectively, and reduced deferred income tax assets, goodwill and OREO by $15.5 million, $15.9 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

49

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the largest component of our income, and is affected by the interest rate environment, and the volume and the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-earning assets include loans, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, investment securities, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. Our interest-bearing liabilities include deposits, federal funds purchased, subordinated debentures underlying the trust preferred securities we acquired in connection with our acquisitions, repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings.

	Three Months  Ended September 30, 2013								Three Months Ended June  30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balances			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates			Average Balances			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1)	$	4,514,747		$	67,524		5.93	%	$	4,604,224		$	68,363		5.96	%
Investment securities (1)		1,230,771			4,639		1.50	%		1,292,249			4,525		1.40	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		61,995			37		0.24	%		164,784			102		0.25	%
FHLB and FRB stock		40,195			533		5.26	%		36,278			462		5.11	%
Total interest-earning assets		5,847,708			72,733		4.93	%		6,097,535			73,452		4.83	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		105,360								105,347
Other assets		727,599								759,771
Total non-interest-earning assets		832,959								865,118
Total assets	$	6,680,667							$	6,962,653
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits	$	1,660,373		$	3,792		0.91	%	$	1,853,592		$	4,598		0.99	%
Money market		977,698			544		0.22	%		1,055,635			575		0.22	%
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		1,260,477			521		0.16	%		1,263,133			499		0.16	%
Savings deposits		524,728			276		0.21	%		506,997			255		0.20	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		4,423,276			5,133		0.46	%		4,679,357			5,927		0.51	%
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
Short-term borrowings and FHLB advances		34,820			7		0.08	%		38,794			15		0.16	%
Long-term borrowings		140,938			1,953		5.50	%		142,541			1,894		5.33	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,599,034		$	7,093		0.61	%	$	4,860,692		$	7,837		0.65	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Demand deposits		914,260								903,637
Other liabilities		55,823								56,324
Shareholders’ equity		1,111,550								1,142,000
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity		2,081,633								2,101,961
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,680,667							$	6,962,653
Interest rate spread (tax equivalent basis)							4.32	%							4.19	%
Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)				$	65,640							$	65,616
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis)							4.45	%							4.32	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		127.15	%							125.45	%

(1) Average loans and securities include non-performing assets. Interest income and rates include the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable statutory tax rates in adjusting tax-exempt interest on tax-exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis.

50

Rate/Volume Analysis

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Due to Changes(1) in
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Volume			Average Rate			Net  Increase (Decrease)
Interest income
Loans (2)	$	(1,360	)	$	521		$	(839	)
Investment securities (2)		(222	)		336			114
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		(61	)		(4	)		(65	)
FHLB and FRB stock		51			20			71
Total interest income	$	(1,592	)	$	873		$	(719	)
Interest expense
Time deposits	$	(458	)	$	(348	)	$	(806	)
Money market		(43	)		12			(31	)
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		(1	)		23			22
Savings deposits		9			12			21
Short-term borrowings and FHLB advances		(1	)		(7	)		(8	)
Long-term borrowings		(21	)		80			59
Total interest expense	$	(515	)	$	(228	)	$	(743	)
Change in net interest income	$	(1,077	)	$	1,101		$	24

(1) For each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes due to average volumes and changes due to rates, with the changes in both volumes and rates allocated to these two categories based on the proportionate absolute changes in each category.

(2) Interest income includes the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable federal tax rates in adjusting tax exempt interest on tax exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis. Average volumes include non-performing assets which results in the impact of the non-accrual of interest being reflected in the change in average rate.

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to three months ended June 30, 2013

Our net interest income of $65.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 remained flat compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in loan portfolio yields and average balances were partially offset by additional accretion from PCI loans, higher yields on investment securities, the third quarter prepayment of trust preferred securities and the decline in high cost time deposits. Accordingly, the net interest margin increased 13 basis points to 4.45% and our net interest income spread increased to 4.32% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to 4.19% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Loan yields decreased to 5.93% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from 5.96% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 largely driven by new loan originations, which were booked at an average yield of 3.98%, which was flat compared to the prior quarter. This lower yield on originated loans was partially offset by PCI portfolio yields which decreased to a weighted average of 7.22%. The average loan balance decreased due to the resolution of problem loans and principal repayments. Securities yields increased 10 basis points to 1.50% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to 1.40% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Our cost of funds declined to 0.51% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from 0.55% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, due to the decline in time deposits as a result of continued planned shrinkage in high-cost legacy time deposits and the $8.0 million third quarter prepayment of trust preferred securities, which reduced our long-term borrowings by approximately 6.0%. Core deposits represent 70.0% of total deposit funding as of September 30, 2013 and deposits represented 97.0% of total bank funding.

As of September 30, 2013, we held cash and securities equal to 20.8% of total assets. We intend to use our current excess liquidity and capital for general corporate purposes, including loan originations as well as the acquisition of depository institutions that meet our investment standards. Our loan originations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $291.3 million.

51

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013								Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balances			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates			Average Balances			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1)	$	4,514,747		$	67,524		5.93	%	$	4,120,374		$	65,031		6.28	%
Investment securities (1)		1,230,771			4,639		1.50	%		982,750			4,025		1.63	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		61,995			37		0.24	%		280,164			181		0.26	%
FHLB and FRB stock		40,195			533		5.26	%		39,224			460		4.67	%
Total interest-earning assets		5,847,708			72,733		4.93	%		5,422,512			69,697		5.11	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		105,360								103,019
Other assets		727,599								673,321
Total non-interest-earning assets		832,959								776,340
Total assets	$	6,680,667							$	6,198,852
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits	$	1,660,373		$	3,792		0.91	%	$	1,857,122		$	5,341		1.14	%
Money market		977,698			544		0.22	%		876,891			758		0.34	%
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		1,260,477			521		0.16	%		1,044,506			636		0.24	%
Savings deposits		524,728			276		0.21	%		399,300			288		0.29	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		4,423,276			5,133		0.46	%		4,177,819			7,023		0.67	%
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
Short-term borrowings and FHLB advances		34,820			7		0.08	%		80,336			130		0.64	%
Long-term borrowings		140,938			1,953		5.50	%		135,893			1,951		5.71	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,599,034		$	7,093		0.61	%	$	4,394,048		$	9,104		0.82	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Demand deposits		914,260								722,987
Other liabilities		55,823								50,587
Shareholders’ equity		1,111,550								1,031,230
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity		2,081,633								1,804,804
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,680,667							$	6,198,852
Interest rate spread (tax equivalent basis)							4.32	%							4.29	%
Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)				$	65,640							$	60,593
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis)							4.45	%							4.45	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		127.15	%							123.41	%

(1) Average loans and securities include non-performing assets. Interest income and rates include the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable statutory tax rates in adjusting tax-exempt interest on tax-exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis.

52

Rate/Volume Analysis

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Due to Changes(1) in
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Volume			Average Rate			Net  Increase (Decrease)
Interest income
Loans (2)	$	6,014		$	(3,521	)	$	2,493
Investment securities (2)		954			(340	)		614
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		(131	)		(13	)		(144	)
FHLB and FRB stock		12			61			73
Total interest income	$	6,849		$	(3,813	)	$	3,036
Interest expense
Time deposits	$	(526	)	$	(1,023	)	$	(1,549	)
Money market		80			(294	)		(214	)
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		115			(230	)		(115	)
Savings deposits		77			(89	)		(12	)
Short-term borrowings and FHLB advances		(48	)		(75	)		(123	)
Long-term borrowings		71			(69	)		2
Total interest expense	$	(231	)	$	(1,780	)	$	(2,011	)
Change in net interest income	$	7,080		$	(2,033	)	$	5,047

(1) For each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes due to average volumes and changes due to rates, with the changes in both volumes and rates allocated to these two categories based on the proportionate absolute changes in each category.

(2) Interest income includes the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable federal tax rates in adjusting tax exempt interest on tax exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis. Average asset volumes include non-performing assets which results in the impact of the non-accrual of interest being reflected in the change in average rate.

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to three months ended September 30, 2012

Our net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 increased by $5.1 million or 8.4% to $65.4 million, from $60.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase reflects the inclusion of SCMF acquired on October 1, 2012, a decline in deposit rates across all deposit types, pay-off of FHLB advances during the third quarter of the prior year and pre-payment of high yield trust preferred securities in 2013. The net interest margin of 4.45% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was flat compared to the net interest margin for the three months ended September 31, 2012. Loan yields decreased to 5.93% from 6.28% primarily due to $818.0 million in loans with a 5.35% weighted average yield acquired with SCMF and loan originations, which were booked at an average yield of 3.98% during the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to an average yield of 4.52% during the three months ended September 30, 2012. Securities yields decreased to 1.50% from 1.63% due to market interest rates remaining at historic lows limiting the yield of reinvestment of cash flows of higher yield investments acquired with SCMF. Our cost of funds declined to 0.51% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from 0.71% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, due to the decline in rates of 23 basis points on time deposits, 12 basis points on money market accounts and 8 basis points on negotiable order of withdrawal accounts and savings accounts. The decrease in short-term borrowings resulted from the repayment of $66.2 million in FHLB advances in continuation of a deleveraging strategy.

53

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balances			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates			Average Balances			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1)	$	4,597,730		$	207,842		6.04	%	$	4,195,229		$	199,990		6.37	%
Investment securities (1)		1,177,377			12,714		1.44	%		1,079,141			15,584		1.93	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		269,121			510		0.25	%		266,805			476		0.24	%
FHLB and FRB stock		38,451			1,485		5.16	%		38,641			1,293		4.47	%
Total interest-earning assets		6,082,679			222,551		4.89	%		5,579,816			217,343		5.20	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		107,192								97,526
Other assets		751,833								692,104
Total non-interest-earning assets		859,025								789,630
Total assets	$	6,941,704							$	6,369,446
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits	$	1,832,242		$	13,429		0.98	%	$	1,985,543		$	16,141		1.09	%
Money market		1,048,559			1,748		0.22	%		892,059			3,057		0.46	%
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		1,266,451			1,575		0.17	%		1,065,208			2,152		0.27	%
Savings deposits		511,890			789		0.21	%		356,267			831		0.31	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		4,659,142			17,541		0.50	%		4,299,077			22,181		0.69	%
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
Short-term borrowings and FHLB advances		38,924			36		0.12	%		143,215			937		0.87	%
Long-term borrowings		151,354			6,346		5.61	%		135,464			5,823		5.74	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,849,420		$	23,923		0.66	%	$	4,577,756		$	28,941		0.84	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Demand deposits		902,237								732,041
Other liabilities		50,639								46,194
Shareholders’ equity		1,139,308								1,013,455
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity		2,092,284								1,791,690
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,941,704							$	6,369,446
Interest rate spread (tax equivalent basis)							4.21	%							4.36	%
Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)				$	198,628							$	188,402
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis)							4.37	%							4.51	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		125.43	%							121.89	%

(1) Average loans and securities include non-performing assets. Interest income and rates include the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable statutory tax rates in adjusting tax-exempt interest on tax-exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis.

54

Rate/Volume Analysis

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Due to Changes (1) in
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Volume			Average Rate			Net  Increase (Decrease)
Interest income
Loans (2)	$	18,543		$	(10,691	)	$	7,852
Investment securities (2)		1,324			(4,194	)		(2,870	)
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		4			30			34
FHLB and FRB stock		(6	)		198			192
Total interest income	$	19,865		$	(14,657	)	$	5,208
Interest expense
Time deposits	$	(1,192	)	$	(1,520	)	$	(2,712	)
Money market		466			(1,775	)		(1,309	)
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		355			(932	)		(577	)
Savings deposits		294			(336	)		(42	)
Short-term borrowings and FHLB advances		(413	)		(488	)		(901	)
Long-term borrowings		669			(146	)		523
Total interest expense	$	179		$	(5,197	)	$	(5,018	)
Change in net interest income	$	19,686		$	(9,460	)	$	10,226

(1) For each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes due to average volumes and changes due to rates, with the changes in both volumes and rates allocated to these two categories based on the proportionate absolute changes in each category

(2) Interest income includes the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable federal tax rates in adjusting tax exempt interest on tax exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis. Average loan volumes include non-performing assets which results in the impact of the non-accrual of interest being reflected in the change in average rate.

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2012

Our net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased by $10.3 million or 5.5% to $197.9 million, from $187.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase reflects the inclusion of SCMF partially offset by a decline in securities yields and rates across all deposit types and the pay-off of FHLB advances during the second half of the prior year. The net interest margin decreased 14 basis points to 4.37% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to 4.51% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due to a decrease in our net interest income spread which was 4.23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to 4.36% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Loan yields decreased to 6.04% from 6.37% primarily due to $818.0 million in loans with a 5.35% weighted average yield acquired with SCMF and loan originations, which were booked at an average yield of 4.10% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to an average yield of 4.43% during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Securities yields decreased to 1.44% from 1.93% due to market interest rates remaining at historic lows limiting the yield of reinvestment of cash flows of higher yield investments acquired with SCMF. Cost of funds declined to 0.56% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from 0.73% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to decline in rates across all deposit types, led by a decline of 11 basis points in time deposits, 24 basis points in money market accounts and 10 basis points in negotiable order of withdrawal accounts and savings accounts. The decrease in short-term borrowings resulted from the repayment of $221.0 million in FHLB advances in continuation of a deleveraging strategy, partially offset by an increase in long-term borrowings due to the addition of the SCMF trust preferred securities.

55

Provision for Loan Losses

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to three months ended September 30, 2012

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $1.0 million. The provision was comprised of $1.1 million related to the increase in the allowance for loan losses established for originated loans and approximately $0.1 million reversal due to improvements in cash flow expectations on certain acquired impaired loans. We originated $291.3 million in new loans during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $5.8 million. The provision was comprised of $4.7 million related to acquired impaired loans, $0.5 million related to acquired loans which were not considered impaired at the date of acquisition and $0.6 million related to the increase in the allowance for loan losses established for originated loans. We originated $172.5 million in new loans during the three months ended September 30, 2012. Of the $4.7 million impairment related to the acquired impaired loans, approximately $2.8 million and $1.9 million resulted from the covered portfolio and the non-covered portfolio, respectively. We are covered by indemnification agreements from the FDIC for the covered loan portfolio, and an increase in the value of the indemnification asset of approximately $0.8 million was associated with the provision for loan losses required for these loans during the third quarter of 2012

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2012

The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $10.9 million. The provision was comprised of $12.2 million related to the increase in the allowance for loan losses established for originated loans, partially offset by reversal of approximately $0.6 million related to acquired loans which were not considered impaired at the date of acquisition and $0.7 million in net impairment reversals due to improvements in our expectations for future cash flows for acquired impaired loans. We originated $844.3 million in new loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Of the $12.2 million related to the increase in the allowance for loan losses for originated loans, $7.8 million related to a single commercial credit relationship associated with suspected fraud. Of the $0.7 million in net impairment reversals related to the acquired impaired loans, approximately $3.4 million resulted from the covered portfolio partially offset by additional impairment of $2.7 million from the non-covered portfolio. We are covered by indemnification agreements with the FDIC for the covered loan portfolio, and a decrease in the value of the indemnification asset of approximately $2.4 million was associated with the provision for loan losses reversal for these loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $17.8 million. The provision was comprised of $12.1 million related to acquired impaired loans, $1.0 million related to acquired loans which were not considered impaired at the date of acquisition and $4.7 million related to the increase in the allowance for loan losses established for originated loans. We originated $618.8 million in new loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Of the $12.1 million impairment related to the acquired impaired loans, $5.6 million resulted from the covered portfolio and $6.5 million resulted from the non-covered portfolio. We are covered by indemnification agreements with the FDIC for the covered loan portfolio, and an increase in the value of the indemnification asset of approximately $3.7 million was associated with the provision for loan losses for these loans during nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Purchase Credit Impaired (“PCI”) loans, loans acquired where there was evidence of credit deterioration since origination and where it was probable that we will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments, are aggregated in pools of loans with similar risk characteristics and accounted for as purchased credit-impaired. Subsequent to acquisition, estimates of cash flows expected to be collected are updated each reporting period based on updated assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions. If we have unfavorable changes in our estimates of cash flows expected to be collected for a loan pool (other than due to decreases in interest rate indices) which result in the present value of such cash flows being less than the recorded investment of the pool, we record the impairment through the provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase in the allowance for loan losses for that pool. If we have favorable changes in our estimates of cash flows expected to be collected for a loan pool such that the then-present value exceeds the recorded investment of that pool, we will first reverse any previously established allowance for loan losses for the pool. If such estimate exceeds the amount of any previously established allowance, we will accrete future interest income over the remaining life of the pool at a rate which, when used to discount the expected cash flows, results in the then-present value of such cash flows equaling the recorded investment of the pool at the time of the revised estimate.

Changes in expected cash flows on loan pools resulted from several factors, which include actual and projected maturity date extensions through renewals of certain loans along with maturity extensions related to workout strategies or borrower requests on other loans; improved precision in the cash flow estimation; actual payment and loss experience on certain loans; and changes to the internal risk ratings of certain loans. When actual and projected maturity dates are extended beyond the dates assumed in previous cash flow estimations, the expected lives of those loans are extended and cash flows as well as impairment and accretable yield can change. We forecast the payment stream of each pool of PCI loans at the original acquisition-date valuation as well as at each subsequent re-estimation date; however, previously un-forecasted loan renewals or extensions can occur as the borrowers’ cash flow needs and other circumstances change over time. Cash flow estimates have generally improved since the acquisition dates as our lending officers and credit administration department have been in regular contact with each borrower and have developed a fuller understanding of each borrowers’ financial condition and business or personal needs. Actual payment experience on certain loans can also change expected cash flows as problem loan resolutions, loan payoffs and prepayments occur. Finally, changes to the risk ratings of certain PCI loans occur based on our evaluation of the financial condition of borrowers. As the financial condition and repayment ability of borrowers improve over time, our policy is to upgrade the risk ratings associated with these loans and increase our cash flow expectations for these loans. Conversely, as the financial condition and repayment ability of borrowers deteriorate over time, our policy is to downgrade the associated risk ratings and decrease our cash flow expectations for these loans accordingly.

56

The table below illustrates the impact of our third quarter estimates of expected cash flows on PCI loans on impairment and prospective yield:

			Weighted Average Prospective Yields
(Dollars in thousands)	Cumulative Impairment		Based on  Original Estimates of Expected  Cash Flows			Based on Most Recent  Estimates of Expected Cash Flows
Covered portfolio	$	13,416		6.09	%		7.64	%
Non-covered portfolio	$	25,701		5.56	%		7.15	%
Total	$	39,117		5.64	%		7.22	%

Non-interest Income

The following table sets forth the components of non-interest income for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	6,034		$	5,058	$	18,711		$	17,381
Debit card income		2,854			2,442		8,669			7,792
Fees on mortgage loans originated and sold		1,477			1,612		4,319			3,920
FDIC indemnification asset (amortization) accretion		(502	)		850		(3,779	)		1,008
Legal settlements and insurance recoveries		900			3,460		900			3,460
Gain on exchange of partnership interest		1,536			—		1,536			—
Investment advisory and trust fees		740			253		1,380			991
Gain on sale of facilities		—			—		594			—
OREO revenue		343			374		1,298			374
Derivative (expense) income		(73	)		—		617			—
Investment securities (losses) gains, net		(301	)		4,918		(96	)		8,566
Other		2,272			1,301		5,546			3,778
Total non-interest income	$	15,280		$	20,268	$	39,695		$	47,270

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to three months ended September 30, 2012

Non-interest income decreased to $15.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $20.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a $5.2 million decrease in investment security gains as a result of company’s strategy to sell non-core assets to lower premium and prepayment risk in our investment portfolio in the prior year, a $2.6 million decrease in legal settlements and insurance recoveries and a $1.4 million increase in FDIC indemnification asset amortization resulting from improvements in our expectations of future cash flows for acquired loans. Partially offsetting the decrease was a $1.5 million gain on two small investment company partnership interests and increased service charge income on deposit accounts, debit card income, earnings on bank owned life insurance policies and investment and advisory income due to the inclusion of SCMF results which we acquired on October 1, 2012.

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2012

Non-interest income decreased to $39.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $47.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to an $8.7 million decrease in investment security gains as a result of company’s strategy to sell non-core assets to lower premium and prepayment risk in our investment portfolio in the prior year, a $4.8 million increase in FDIC indemnification asset amortization resulting from improvements in our expectations of future cash flows for acquired loans and a $2.6 million decrease in legal settlements and insurance recoveries. Partially offsetting the decrease was a $1.5 million gain on two investment company partnership interests, $0.9 million in rents received on foreclosed properties, $0.6 million on gains from three facilities as a result of our initiatives to reduce redundant or excess facility and office space combined with increased service charge income on deposit accounts, debit card income, earnings on bank owned life insurance policies, derivative income and investment and advisory income due to the inclusion of SCMF results which we acquired on October 1, 2012.

57

Non-interest Expense

The following table sets forth the components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Salary and employee benefits	$	22,606		$	21,295		$	66,085		$	66,951
Stock-based compensation		1,371			4,242			4,312			14,927
Net occupancy expense		10,740			9,355			31,973			28,229
OREO valuation expenses		6,045			8,633			18,844			15,529
Loss (gain) on sales of OREO		188			(1,514	)		(3,204	)		(3,937	)
Foreclosed asset related expense		1,265			2,530			4,909			7,414
Loan workout expense		2,063			2,310			6,363			5,755
Professional fees		2,426			2,759			7,418			9,511
Computer services		3,231			2,368			9,872			6,913
CVR (income) expense		(776	)		(179	)		2,535			(179	)
Conversion and merger related expenses		(19	)		3,894			234			6,939
FDIC assessments		1,710			1,655			5,276			4,955
Telecommunication expense		1,534			1,630			4,919			4,208
Amortization of intangibles		1,270			1,132			3,812			3,406
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		(430	)		2,946			(122	)		3,267
Legal settlement expense		535			1,755			535			2,752
Other operating expense		5,504			4,560			16,197			14,598
Total non-interest expense	$	59,263		$	69,371		$	179,958		$	191,238

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to three months ended September 30, 2012

Non-interest expense decreased to $59.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $69.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of $2.9 million in stock-based compensation associated with founders’ grants, gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.4 million on pre-paid trust preferred securities in the third quarter of 2013 compared to a $2.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt on the repayment of FHLB advances in the third quarter of 2012, a decrease of $1.2 million in legal settlement expenses and $1.3 million of foreclosed asset related expense primarily related to overall decline in carrying costs, such as maintenance and repairs.

To evaluate and control operating costs, we monitor certain performance metrics including our efficiency ratio, which equals total non-interest expense divided by net revenue (net interest income plus non-interest income). Our efficiency ratio has been and is expected to continue to be significantly impacted by certain costs that follow acquisitions of troubled financial institutions. Our efficiency ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was 73.5%, which was impacted by $0.8 million of CVR income, $1.1 million of stock-based compensation associated with original founders’ awards, a $0.4 million gain on extinguishment of debt and $0.1 million of investment security losses. Excluding the impact of these items, our adjusted efficiency ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was 73.5%.

Our efficiency ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was 86.1%, which was impacted by $4.6 million of stock-based compensation and severance, $3.9 million of conversion and merger expenses due to integration of the acquired banks, $1.8 million of legal settlement expense, $2.9 million of loss on extinguishment of debt, $0.5 million of legal expense related to the acquisition of SCMF, $4.9 million of investment security gains and $1.8 million of insurance settlement recoveries. Excluding the impact of these items, our adjusted efficiency ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was 75.6%.

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2012

Non-interest expense decreased to $180.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $191.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease is primarily due to a $10.6 million decrease in stock-based compensation associated with founders’ grants, and a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million on pre-paid trust preferred securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. A $3.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt on the repayment of FHLB advances, a $6.7 million decrease in conversion and merger related expenses due to integration of the acquired banks and a $2.2 million decrease in legal settlement expenses impacted operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Offsetting this decrease was an increase of $3.3 million in valuation allowances on foreclosed properties primarily related to partially completed construction projects and land in North Carolina and Tennessee and an increase of $2.7 million in CVR expense as a result of improvements in our legacy Green Bankshares portfolio during the first quarter of 2013. The CVR liability is measured each quarter based upon our most recent estimates of expected credit losses from each acquired portfolio. Each CVR is payable after the fifth anniversary of the consummation of the respective acquisition and the current amount of the liability represents the expected payout discounted at an estimated market discount rate from the payout date to the reporting date.

58

Occupancy expense increased by $3.7 million related to the operations of the SCMF network and facilities which we acquired in the fourth quarter of 2012.

Our efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was 75.8%, which was impacted by $2.5 million of CVR expense, $4.0 million of stock-based compensation associated with original founder awards, a $0.1 million gain on extinguishment of debt, $0.1 million of merger related costs and $0.2 million of investment security gains. Excluding the impact of these items, our adjusted efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was 73.1%.

Our efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 81.4%, which was impacted by $15.6 million of stock-based compensation and severance expense, $6.9 million of conversion and merger expenses due to integration of the acquired banks, $2.8 million of legal settlement expense, a $3.3 million of loss on extinguishment of debt, $0.5 million of legal expense related to the acquisition of SCMF, $0.2 million of CVR income, $8.6 million of investment security gains and $1.8 million of insurance settlement recoveries. Excluding the impact of these items, our adjusted efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 72.3%.

The adjusted efficiency ratios, which equal adjusted non-interest expense divided by adjusted net revenues (net interest income plus non-interest income), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest expense	$	59,263		$	69,371		$	179,958		$	191,238
Less: Stock-based compensation and severance (severance in salaries and employee benefits)		1,147			4,563			3,991			15,610
Less: CVR (income) expense		(776	)		(179	)		2,535			(179	)
Less: Conversion and merger related expense (conversion and merger expense and salaries and employee benefits		—			3,894			133			6,939
Less: Legal settlement expenses		—			1,755			—			2,752
Less: Legal fees (professional fees)		—			500			—			500
Less: (Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		(430	)		2,946			(122	)		3,267
Non-interest expense, adjusted	$	59,322		$	55,892		$	173,421		$	162,349
Net interest income	$	65,386		$	60,334		$	197,852		$	187,531
Non-interest income		15,280			20,268			39,695			47,270
Less: Investment security gains (losses)		(54	)		4,918			151			8,566
Less: Legal settlements and insurance recoveries		—			1,755			—			1,755
Net revenue, adjusted	$	80,720		$	73,929		$	237,396		$	224,480
Adjusted Efficiency Ratio		73.5	%		75.6	%		73.1	%		72.3	%

The adjusted efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure which we believe provides analysts and investors with information useful in understanding our business and evaluating our operating efficiency. We monitor the adjusted efficiency ratio to evaluate and control operating costs. The adjusted efficiency ratio is also a measure utilized by our Board of Directors in measuring management’s performance in controlling operating costs in comparison to peers. This non-GAAP measure has inherent limitations, is not required to be uniformly applied and is not audited. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results reported under GAAP. This non-GAAP measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies and should not be viewed as a substitute for non-interest expense.

59

Income Taxes

The calculation of our income tax provision is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments. As part of our analysis and implementation of business strategies, consideration is given to the tax laws and regulations that apply to the specific facts and circumstances for any tax position under evaluation. For tax positions that are uncertain in nature, management determines whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. For tax positions that meet the threshold, management then estimates the amount of the tax benefit to recognize in the financial statements. Management closely monitors tax developments in order to evaluate the effect they may have on our overall tax position and the estimates and judgments used in determining the income tax provision and records adjustments as necessary.

The provision for income taxes includes federal and state income taxes. Fluctuations in effective tax rates reflect the effect of the differences in the inclusion or deductibility of certain income and expenses, respectively, for income tax purposes. At September 30, 2013, we had a deferred tax asset of $177.9 million, which principally reflects the tax effect of the acquisition accounting adjustments made in connection with each of the acquisitions, subject to the limits of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as the “Internal Revenue Code”), which determines our ability to preserve the tax benefits of existing net operating losses and built-in losses in a change of control. The majority of our deferred tax assets arose from discounts we recognized against loans to initially record them at estimated fair value for each of our seven acquisitions. These discounts represent both expected credit losses and amounts of accretable yield or accretable discount which will be recognized as loan interest income. As of each acquisition date, we analyzed the amounts of these discounts which related to expected credit losses to determine which would be considered “built-in” losses, generally, those recognizable as deductions for income tax purposes during the first twelve months subsequent to the acquisition date. These analyses were used to determine the deferred tax assets to initially recognize in acquisition accounting and appropriately considered the annual limitations on the use of built-in losses and net operating losses of our acquired entities.

The Company uses the estimated annual effective tax rate method in computing its interim tax provision. Certain items, including, those deemed to be unusual, infrequent or which cannot be reliably estimated, are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. In these cases, the actual tax expense or benefit applicable to that item is treated discretely, and is reported in the same period as the related item. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the change in value of the CVR and related expense resulted from the overall improvement in our most recent estimates of cash flows, substantially related to the Company’s legacy GreenBankshares and Southern Community portfolios. This expense is not deductible for income tax purposes and was treated discretely as described above. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the tax-effected impact of the CVR was $(0.3) million and $1.2 million, respectively.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax of the states of Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, a new North Carolina law was enacted which reduces the North Carolina income tax rate to 6% in 2014 and 5% in 2015. Under GAAP rules, the effects of a change in tax law or rates must be recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. As such, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded a $1.6 million charge to income tax expense as a result of the reduction in blended tax rate that caused the Company to revalue its deferred tax assets.

Our future effective income tax rate will fluctuate based on the mix of taxable and tax-free investments we make and our overall level of taxable income. See the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about the calculation of income tax expense and the various components thereof. Additionally, there were no unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and we do not expect the total of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months.

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to three months ended September 30, 2012

The provision for income taxes was $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The effective income tax rate was approximately 44% for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The higher tax rate in the current period is due to the effects of a new North Carolina law that was enacted during the third quarter of 2013, reducing the income tax rate to 6% in 2014 and 5% in 2015 as indicated above.

Excluding the CVR and the income tax expense related to the North Carolina rate change, the effective income tax rate was approximately 37.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

The income tax benefit was $32.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The effective income tax rate was approximately (593.1) % for the three months ended September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2012, we recorded $34.0 million in income tax benefit as a result of an increase in our deferred tax asset due to an improvement in forecasted tax deductible losses from acquired loans. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, a calculation is required to limit the NOLs and other built-in losses from the acquired companies. As we completed certain tax analyses and filed our 2011 tax return during the third quarter of 2012, we concluded that our deferred tax asset estimates were too conservative with regard to loan losses that would be limited. As a result, we recognized the increased value of our deferred tax asset associated with our increased deductibility expectations. In addition, a tax benefit of $0.4 million was recorded due to a favorable return to provision adjustment during the quarter.

Excluding the income tax benefits related to the deductibility of loan losses of $34.0 million, and return to provision adjustment of $0.4 million, the effective income tax rate was approximately 35.8 % for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2012

The provision for income taxes was $20.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the effective income tax rate was approximately 43%. The higher tax rate in the current period is due to the effects of a new North Carolina law that was enacted during the third quarter of 2013, reducing the state income tax rate to 6% in 2014 and 5% in 2015 as indicated above.

60

Excluding the CVR and the income tax expense related to the North Carolina rate change, the effective income tax rate was approximately 37.22% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The income tax benefit was $24.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The effective income tax rate was approximately (95.2) % for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2012, we recorded $34.0 million in income tax benefit as a result of an increase in our deferred tax asset due to an improvement in forecasted tax deductible losses from acquired loans. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, a calculation is required to limit the NOLs and other built-in losses from the acquired companies. As we completed certain tax analyses and filed our 2011 tax return during the third quarter of 2012, we concluded that our deferred tax asset estimates were too conservative with regard to loan losses that would be limited. As a result, we recognized the increased value of our deferred tax asset associated with our increased deductibility expectations. In addition, a tax benefit of $0.4 million was recorded due to a favorable return to provision adjustment during the period.

Excluding the income tax benefits related to the deductibility of loan losses of $34.0 million, and return to provision adjustment of $0.4 million, the effective income tax rate was approximately 37.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

61

Financial Condition

Our assets totaled $6.6 billion and $7.3 billion at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $163.7 million at September 30, 2013 from $734.9 million at December 31, 2012 primarily due to a $604.4 million reduction in deposits and $62.9 million in stock repurchase programs authorized in the first and third quarters of 2013. Total loans at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $4.5 billion and $4.7 billion, respectively. The decrease in total loans was due to resolutions of problem loans plus principal repayments, partially offset by new originations. Total deposits were $5.3 billion and $5.9 billion at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The decrease in total deposits was primarily a result of continued planned shrinkage in high-cost legacy time deposits. Borrowed funds, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, short-term borrowings, notes payable and subordinated debentures, totaled $162.8 million and $223.4 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The decrease in borrowed funds was primarily due to the first quarter pre-payment of $34.5 million and third quarter pre-payment of $8.0 million of trust preferred securities.

Shareholders’ equity was $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Rising interest rates during 2013 resulted in market value declines of our securities portfolio resulting in a $15.6 million net unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive income. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company transferred $511.0 million of available-for-sale securities to held-to maturity securities, at fair value, reflecting the Company’s intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. The related $9.7 million of unrealized holding loss, net of tax, related to the assets transferred is retained in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the remaining life of the securities. On February 5, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $50.0 million stock repurchase plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company repurchased $50.0 million, or 2,839 common shares at an average price of $17.60 per share, respectively, completing this authorized stock repurchase. On September 16, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of the Company’s common stock. Stock repurchases may be made from time to time, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The approved stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of shares, and the program may be extended, modified, suspended, or discontinued at any time. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company repurchased $12.9 million, or 600,000 common shares at a price of $21.50 per share.

Loans

Our loan portfolio is our primary earning asset. Our strategy is to grow the loan portfolio by originating commercial and consumer loans that we believe to be of high quality, that comply with our conservative credit policies and that produce revenues consistent with our financial objectives. Additionally, we have worked to reduce excessive concentrations in commercial real estate loans, which were the predominant portion of the acquisitions’ legacy portfolios, in order to achieve a more diversified portfolio mix.

The following table sets forth the carrying amounts of our loan portfolio.

(Dollars in thousands)	As of September 30, 2013					As of December 31, 2012					Sequential Change
Loan Type	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount			Percent
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	803,954		18.0	%	$	904,215		19.1	%	$	(100,261	)		(11.1	)%
Other commercial C&D		326,040		7.6	%		415,969		8.8	%		(89,929	)		(21.6	)%
Multifamily commercial real estate		72,627		1.6	%		84,838		1.8	%		(12,211	)		(14.4	)%
1-4 family residential C&D		76,013		1.7	%		91,680		1.9	%		(15,667	)		(17.1	)%
Total commercial real estate	$	1,278,634		28.6	%	$	1,496,702		31.6	%	$	(218,068	)		(14.6	)%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		1,052,994		23.5	%		1,065,900		22.5	%		(12,906	)		(1.2	)%
Commercial and industrial		681,882		15.2	%		665,507		14.1	%		16,375			2.5	%
Lease financing		2,554		0.1	%		—					2,554			100.0	%
Total commercial	$	1,737,430		38.8	%	$	1,731,407		36.6	%	$	6,023			0.3	%
1-4 family residential		816,915		18.3	%		838,557		17.7	%		(21,642	)		(2.6	)%
Home equity		386,071		8.6	%		430,887		9.1	%		(44,816	)		(10.4	)%
Consumer		158,452		3.5	%		136,806		2.9	%		21,646			15.8	%
Total consumer	$	1,361,438		30.4	%	$	1,406,250		29.7	%	$	(44,812	)		(3.2	)%
Other		99,778		2.2	%		101,131		2.1	%		(1,353	)		(1.3	)%
Total	$	4,477,280		100.0	%	$	4,735,490		100.0	%	$	(258,210	)		(5.5	)%

        During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our loan portfolio decreased by $258.2 million due to $260.5 million in resolutions of problem loans and $841.9 million in net principal repayments during the period, partially offset by $844.3 million of new loan originations. The composition of new loan production is indicative of our business strategy of emphasizing commercial and industrial and consumer loans and reducing our overall concentration of commercial real estate loans. As illustrated in greater detail in the table below, total commercial loans and total consumer and other loans represented approximately 52.2% and 31.9%, respectively, of new loan production for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 62.0% and 27.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This production emphasis, which resulted in nearly 84.1% of our new loan production for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 in categories other than commercial real estate, along with normal runoff of the legacy portfolios has led to the continued reduction in commercial real estate loans which represented approximately 28.6% of the outstanding balance of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2013.

62

Commercial loan production for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $441.1 million. As a result of stronger volumes, commercial loans made up over one-half of our new loan originations during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, while commercial real estate loans were 15.8% of new loan originations, consistent with our plans to reduce concentrations in this category.

63

The following table sets forth our new loan originations (excluding renewals of existing loans) segmented by loan type.

(Dollars in millions)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013					Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Loan Type	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	54.9		6.5	%	$	24.4		5.5	%
Other commercial C&D		32.4		3.8	%		7.6		1.7	%
Multifamily commercial real estate		2.3		0.3	%		1.0		0.2	%
1-4 family residential C&D		44.0		5.2	%		15.7		3.5	%
Total commercial real estate		133.6		15.8	%		48.7		10.9	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		161.5		19.1	%		110.4		24.7	%
Commercial and industrial		277.0		32.8	%		166.7		37.3	%
Lease financing		2.6		0.3	%
Total commercial		441.1		52.2	%		277.1		62.0	%
1-4 family residential		153.1		18.1	%		59.6		13.3	%
Home equity		19.3		2.3	%		11.8		2.6	%
Consumer		81.2		9.6	%		46.1		10.3	%
Total consumer		253.6		30.0	%		117.5		26.2	%
Other		16.0		2.0	%		4.0		0.9	%
Total	$	844.3		100.0	%	$	447.3		100.0	%

We underwrite commercial real estate loans based on the value of the collateral, the ratio of debt service to property income and the creditworthiness of tenants. Due to the inherent risk of commercial real estate lending, we underwrite loans selectively, with the goal of reducing the concentration in our portfolio over time.

Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina and Tennessee accounted for 22.6%, 16.7%, 45.1% and 15.6% of our new loan originations, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia accounted for 33.7%, 13.9%, 23.5%, 28.7% and 0.2% of our new loan originations, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

The contractual maturity distributions of our loan portfolio as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are indicated in the tables below. The majority of these are amortizing loans.

	Loans Maturing (As of September 30, 2013)
(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Year		One to  Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	198,119	$	460,812	$	145,023	$	803,954
Other commercial C&D		179,124		118,013		28,903		326,040
Multifamily commercial real estate		20,704		36,245		15,678		72,627
1-4 family residential C&D		53,237		6,659		16,117		76,013
Total commercial real estate		451,184		621,729		205,721	$	1,278,634
Owner occupied commercial real estate		130,250		654,831		267,913		1,052,994
Commercial and industrial		196,131		418,314		67,437		681,882
Lease financing		—		2,554		—		2,554
Total commercial		326,381		1,075,699		335,350	$	1,737,430
1-4 family residential		95,777		156,323		564,815		816,915
Home equity		24,121		121,264		240,686		386,071
Consumer		10,420		88,367		59,665		158,452
Total consumer		130,318		365,954		865,166	$	1,361,438
Other		15,919		54,024		29,835		99,778
Total	$	923,802	$	2,117,406	$	1,436,072	$	4,477,280

64

	Loans Maturing (As of September 30, 2013)
(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Year		One to  Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Loans with:
Predetermined interest rates	$	423,023	$	1,227,495	$	532,013	$	2,182,531
Floating or adjustable interest rates		500,779		889,911		904,059		2,294,749
Total loans	$	923,802	$	2,117,406	$	1,436,072	$	4,477,280

	Loans Maturing (As of December 31, 2012)
(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Year		One to Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	279,378	$	446,200	$	178,637	$	904,215
Other commercial C&D		237,384		150,869		27,716		415,969
Multifamily commercial real estate		24,441		38,262		22,135		84,838
1-4 family residential C&D		73,580		7,432		10,668		91,680
Total commercial real estate		614,783		642,763		239,156		1,496,702
Owner occupied commercial real estate		152,102		668,511		245,287		1,065,900
Commercial and industrial		234,863		368,519		62,125		665,507
Leasing		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		386,965		1,037,030		307,412		1,731,407
1-4 family residential		135,515		182,635		520,407		838,557
Home equity		26,192		102,638		302,057		430,887
Consumer		13,967		83,322		39,517		136,806
Total consumer		175,674		368,595		861,981		1,406,250
Other		22,040		46,246		32,845		101,131
Total	$	1,199,462	$	2,094,634	$	1,441,394	$	4,735,490

	Loans Maturing (As of December 31, 2012)
(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Year		One to  Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Loans with:
Predetermined interest rates	$	472,698	$	1,234,802	$	493,009	$	2,200,509
Floating or adjustable interest rates		726,764		859,832		948,385		2,534,981
Total loans	$	1,199,462	$	2,094,634	$	1,441,394	$	4,735,490

Asset Quality

Consistent with our strategy of operating with a sound risk profile, we have focused on originating loans we believe to be of high quality, prudently disposing of non-performing assets as rapidly as possible, and reducing the size of our legacy commercial real estate loan portfolio. To achieve these objectives, we underwrite new loans and manage existing loans in accordance with our underwriting standards under the direction of our chief risk officer. Additionally, we have assigned senior credit officers to oversee the Florida, Tennessee and Carolinas markets, and we have established a special assets division to dispose of legacy problem loans and OREO.

We refer to our loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC as “covered loans.” These are the legacy loans of Metro Bank, Turnberry Bank, and First National Bank that are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements that reimburse us for 80% of net charge-offs and OREO losses over a five-year period for commercial loans and a ten-year period for residential loans. We refer to all other loans as “non-covered loans.” These are loans we originate, loans acquired through the acquisitions of Capital Bank, TIB Bank, Greenbank and Southern Community Financial and certain consumer loans of the Failed Banks that we acquired, which are not covered by any loss sharing agreement.

65

Covered Loans

As of September 30, 2013, covered loans were $314.7 million, representing 7.0% of our loan portfolio. Also as of September 30, 2013, the covered loans were 0.4% past due 30-89 days, 13.0% greater than 90 days past due and still accruing/accreting and 0.4% nonaccrual, reflecting the severity of the real estate downturn and the excessive concentrations in commercial real estate and poor quality underwriting that characterized the banks we acquired from the FDIC under their prior business models. We have recorded these loans at estimated fair value reflecting expected lifetime losses estimated as of their acquisition date. Projected reimbursements from the FDIC relating to projected future losses on covered loans are recorded as the FDIC indemnification asset, which was $36.8 million as of September 30, 2013. Actual claims for reimbursement filed with the FDIC for incurred losses on covered loans but not yet paid were $8.4 million at September 30, 2013.

As of December 31, 2012, covered loans were $400.0 million, representing 8.5% of our loan portfolio. Also as of December 31, 2012, the covered loans were 1.8% past due 30-89 days, 18.4% greater than 90 days past due and still accruing/accreting and 0.7% nonaccrual. The FDIC indemnification asset was $49.4 million as of December 31, 2012. Actual claims for reimbursement filed with the FDIC for incurred losses on covered loans but not yet paid were $8.5 million at December 31, 2012.

We manage credit risk associated with loans covered under loss sharing agreements in the same manner as credit risk associated with non-covered loans. This includes following consistent policies and procedures relating to the process of working with borrowers in efforts to resolve problem loans resulting in the lowest losses possible and collection including foreclosure, repossession and the ultimate liquidation of any applicable underlying collateral. The loss sharing agreements also contain certain restrictions and conditions which, among other things, provide that certain credit risk management strategies such as loan sales, under certain conditions, could be prohibited under the agreements and may lead to the termination of coverage of any applicable losses on the related loans. Accordingly, actions taken by management in the process of prudently managing credit risk and borrower relationships, including, but not limited to, the renewal of covered loans for periods extending beyond the expiration of the applicable loss sharing agreement, the extension of additional credit or the making of certain modifications of loan terms, can lead to the termination of coverage under the loss sharing agreements for these particular loans. Additionally, the loss sharing agreements limit coverage to ten years for residential loans and five years for other covered loans.

Collection of loss claims under the loss sharing agreements requires extensive and specific recordkeeping and incremental monthly and quarterly reporting to the FDIC on the status of covered loans. The loss claims filed and the related reporting on covered loans to the FDIC are subject to review and approval by the FDIC and various subcontractors utilized by the FDIC. The requirements for such reporting and interpretations thereof are occasionally revised by the FDIC and its subcontractors. Such changes along with our ability to comply with the requirements and revisions require interpretation and can lead to delays in the collection of claims on losses incurred. Claims filed by us for losses realized through September 30, 2013, totaling $116.6 million have been collected from the FDIC. Additionally, the loss sharing agreements provide for regular examination of compliance with loss sharing agreements including independent reviews of relevant policies and procedures and detailed audits of claims filed. Noncompliance with the provisions of the loss sharing agreements can lead to termination of the agreements.

Non-Covered Loans

As of September 30, 2013, non-covered loans were $4.2 billion, representing 93.0% of our loan portfolio. Also as of September 30, 2013, our non-covered loans were 0.7% past due 30-89 days, 5.8% greater than 90 days past due and still accruing/accreting and 0.3% nonaccrual.

As of December 31, 2012, non-covered loans were $4.3 billion, representing 91.5% of our loan portfolio. Also as of December 31, 2012, our non-covered loans were 1.3% past due 30-89 days, 7.4% greater than 90 days past due and still accruing/accreting and 0.3% nonaccrual.

As a large percentage of the loans are acquired impaired loans, these loans have also been affected by the real estate downturn and excessive commercial real estate concentrations. However, the credit quality of these loans is generally higher than that of the covered loans. In connection with the acquisitions, we applied acquisition accounting adjustments to the non-covered loans not originated by us to reflect estimates, at the time of acquisition, of the expected lifetime losses of such loans.

66

Covered and Non-Covered Loan Credit Quality Summary

The table below summarizes key loan credit quality indicators for our covered and non-covered loan portfolios as of the dates indicated:

	As of September 30, 2013											As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in millions)	Portfolio Balance		% 30-89 Days  Past Due			% Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Accruing/ Accreting			Nonaccrual Loans			Portfolio Balance		% 30-89 Days  Past Due			% Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Accruing/ Accreting			Nonaccrual Loans
Covered Portfolio
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	66.9		0.3	%		18.2	%		0.0	%	$	95.0		2.9	%		18.2	%		0.0	%
Other commercial C&D		20.6		0.0	%		50.0	%		0.0	%		31.7		0.3	%		68.5	%		0.0	%
Multifamily		10.5		0.0	%		9.5	%		0.0	%		11.6		0.0	%		31.0	%		0.0	%
1-4 family residential C&D		—		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		4.2		0.0	%		83.3	%		0.0	%
Total commercial real estate		98.0		0.2	%		24.0	%		0.0	%		142.5		2.0	%		32.4	%		0.0	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		73.6		0.3	%		6.7	%		0.0	%		84.0		1.1	%		9.0	%		0.0	%
Commercial & Industrial		11.0		0.0	%		1.8	%		0.9	%		17.1		0.6	%		11.7	%		1.8	%
Total commercial		84.6		0.2	%		6.0	%		0.1	%		101.1		1.0	%		9.5	%		0.3	%
1-4 family residential		77.8		0.5	%		13.6	%		0.0	%		91.8		1.3	%		14.9	%		0.0	%
Home equity		53.2		0.9	%		3.4	%		2.3	%		60.1		3.3	%		5.0	%		4.2	%
Consumer		0.1		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.2		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Total consumer		131.1		0.7	%		9.5	%		0.9	%		152.1		2.1	%		11.0	%		1.6	%
Other		1.0		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		4.3		0.0	%		23.3	%		0.0	%
Total covered	$	314.7		0.4	%		13.0	%		0.4	%	$	400.0		1.8	%		18.4	%		0.7	%
Non-covered Portfolio
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	737.0		0.7	%		5.7	%		0.0	%	$	809.2		0.6	%		5.5	%		0.0	%
Other commercial C&D		305.4		1.9	%		19.9	%		0.1	%		384.2		1.9	%		21.9	%		0.0	%
Multifamily		62.2		0.2	%		5.5	%		0.0	%		73.2		0.3	%		3.8	%		0.0	%
1-4 family residential C&D		76.0		0.0	%		3.9	%		3.4	%		87.5		3.3	%		5.8	%		0.5	%
Total commercial real estate		1,180.6		0.9	%		9.3	%		0.3	%		1,354.1		1.1	%		10.1	%		0.0	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		979.3		0.4	%		3.8	%		0.2	%		981.9		0.5	%		5.6	%		0.2	%
Commercial and industrial		670.9		0.6	%		3.4	%		0.4	%		648.5		0.7	%		4.9	%		0.3	%
Lease financing		2.6		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Total commercial		1,652.8		0.5	%		3.6	%		0.3	%		1,630.4		0.6	%		5.3	%		0.3	%
1-4 family residential		739.1		1.2	%		5.6	%		0.1	%		746.7		2.3	%		5.6	%		0.5	%
Home equity		332.9		0.7	%		2.0	%		0.9	%		370.8		1.5	%		2.8	%		0.7	%
Consumer		158.4		1.3	%		0.3	%		0.5	%		136.6		2.3	%		0.4	%		0.3	%
Total consumer		1,230.4		1.1	%		3.9	%		0.4	%		1,254.1		2.1	%		4.2	%		0.5	%
Other		98.8		0.4	%		3.1	%		0.0	%		96.8		3.0	%		2.1	%		0.0	%
Total non-covered	$	4,162.6		0.8	%		5.3	%		0.3	%	$	4,335.4		1.2	%		6.4	%		0.3	%
Total	$	4,477.3		0.7	%		5.8	%		0.3	%	$	4,735.4		1.3	%		7.4	%		0.3	%

67

Of the loans past due greater than 90 days and still in accruing/accreting status as of September 30, 2013, $41.0 million (or approximately 15.7%) were loans covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Of the loans past due greater than 90 days and still in accruing/accreting status as of December 31, 2012, $73.4 million (or approximately 20.8%) were loans covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. All of these loans were acquired loans and such loans were either PCI loans or, based upon their recorded investment, were considered well secured and in the process of collection and met the criteria for reporting as 90 days past due and still accruing.

Total non-performing loans as of September 30, 2013, declined by $90.8 million to $275.3 million as compared to $366.1 million at December 31, 2012. The change in non-performing loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was attributable to $53.4 million in transfers to other real estate owned through foreclosures or receipt of deeds in lieu of foreclosures and $138.1 million in resolutions. Partially offsetting these decreases were $100.7 million of loans that became non-performing.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of the loans we foreclosed, or received deeds in lieu of foreclosure, approximately 52% consisted of commercial real estate loans and approximately 12% and 15% were associated with the covered loans in Florida and South Carolina, respectively. Additionally, of the loans transferred to other real estate owned during the period, 27% were covered by loss sharing agreements.

Sales of other real estate owned were $59.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Approximately 66% of the sales were commercial real estate, and approximately 6% and 25% were associated with the covered loans in Florida and South Carolina, respectively.

68

The customer-owed balances and carrying amounts as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (which includes all amounts contractually owed by borrowers) are set forth in the table below:

(Dollars in millions)
Loan Type	Gross Customer Balance Owed September 30, 2013		Carrying Amount  (1) September 30, 2013			Carrying Amount as a Percentage  of Customer Balance			Carrying Amount  of Noncurrent Loans (2)		Carrying Amount of Noncurrent Loans as a Percentage of Carrying Amount
Covered Portfolio
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	113.4	$	66.9			59.0	%	$	12.2		18.2	%
Other commercial C&D		87.5		20.6			23.5	%		10.3		50.0	%
Multifamily		17.3		10.5			60.7	%		1.0		9.5	%
1-4 family residential C&D		4.3		0.0			0.0	%		—		0.0	%
Total commercial real estate		222.5		98.0			44.0	%		23.5		24.0	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		87.7		73.6			83.9	%		4.9		6.7	%
Commercial and industrial		21.3		11.0			51.6	%		0.3		2.7	%
Total commercial		109.0		84.6			77.6	%		5.2		6.1	%
1-4 family residential		110.0		77.8			70.7	%		10.6		13.6	%
Home equity		72.2		53.2			73.7	%		3.0		5.6	%
Consumer		0.1		0.1			—			—		0.0	%
Total consumer		182.3		131.1			71.9	%		13.6		10.4	%
Other		18.7		1.0			5.3	%		—		0.0	%
Total covered	$	532.5	$	314.7	(1)		59.1	%	$	42.3		13.4	%
Non-Covered Portfolio
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	825.0	$	737.0			89.3	%	$	42.1		5.7	%
Other commercial C&D		584.7		305.4			52.2	%		61.3		20.1	%
Multifamily		73.1		62.2			85.1	%		3.4		5.5	%
1-4 family residential C&D		110.1		76.0			69.0	%		5.7		7.5	%
Total commercial real estate		1,592.9		1,180.6			74.1	%		112.5		9.5	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		1,059.8		979.3			92.4	%		39.3		4.0	%
Commercial and industrial		781.9		670.9			85.8	%		25.3		3.8	%
Lease financing		2.6		2.6			100.0	%		0.0		0.0	%
Total commercial		1,844.3		1,652.8			89.6	%		64.6		3.9	%
1-4 family residential		820.6		739.1			90.1	%		42.0		5.7	%
Home equity		394.0		332.9			84.5	%		9.6		2.9	%
Consumer		172.0		158.4			92.1	%		1.2		0.8	%
Total consumer		1,386.6		1,230.4			88.7	%		52.8		4.3	%
Other		109.2		98.8			90.5	%		3.1		3.1	%
Total non-covered	$	4,933.0	$	4,162.6	(1)		84.4	%	$	233.0		5.6	%
Total	$	5,465.5	$	4,477.3			81.9	%	$	275.3		6.1	%

(1) The carrying amount for total covered loans represents a discount from the total gross customer balance of $217.8 million or 40.9%. The total carrying amount of total non-covered loans represents a discount to the gross customer balance of $770.4 million or 15.6%.

(2) Includes loans greater than 90 days past due.

69

(Dollars in millions)
Loan Type	Gross Customer Balance Owed December 31, 2012		Carrying Amount December 31, 2012 (1)			Carrying Amount as  a Percentage  of Customer Balance			Carrying Amount  of Noncurrent Loans (2)		Carrying Amount of Noncurrent Loans as a Percentage of Carrying Amount
Covered Portfolio
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	148.9	$	95.0			63.8	%	$	17.3		18.2	%
Other commercial C&D		98.2		31.7			32.3	%		21.7		68.5	%
Multifamily		22.4		11.6			51.8	%		3.6		31.0	%
1-4 family residential C&D		6.3		4.2			66.7	%		3.5		83.3	%
Total commercial real estate		275.8		142.5			51.7	%		46.1		32.4	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		100.8		84.0			83.3	%		7.6		9.0	%
Commercial and industrial		26.8		17.1			63.8	%		2.3		13.5	%
Leasing		—		—			—			—		—
Total commercial		127.6		101.1			79.2	%		9.9		9.8	%
1-4 family residential		124.3		91.8			73.9	%		13.7		14.9	%
Home equity		81.9		60.1			73.4	%		5.5		9.2	%
Consumer		0.2		0.2			100.0	%		0.0		0.0	%
Total consumer		206.4		152.1			73.7	%		19.2		12.6	%
Other		19.1		4.3			22.5	%		1.0		23.3	%
Total covered	$	628.9	$	400.0	(1)		63.6	%	$	76.2		19.1	%
Non-Covered Portfolio
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	908.7	$	809.2			89.1	%	$	44.9		5.5	%
Other commercial C&D		668.1		384.2			57.5	%		84.3		21.9	%
Multifamily		84.1		73.2			87.0	%		3.4		3.8	%
1-4 family residential C&D		124.7		87.5			70.2	%		5.7		6.3	%
Total commercial real estate		1,785.6		1,354.1			75.8	%		138.3		10.2	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate		1,045.2		981.9			93.9	%		57.0		5.8	%
Commercial and industrial		756.7		648.5			85.7	%		34.1		5.3	%
Leasing		—		—			—			—		—
Total commercial		1,801.9		1,630.4			90.5	%		91.1		5.6	%
1-4 family residential		831.3		746.7			89.8	%		45.6		6.1	%
Home equity		434.7		370.8			85.3	%		12.8		3.5	%
Consumer		150.3		136.6			90.9	%		0.9		0.7	%
Total consumer		1,416.3		1,254.1			88.5	%		59.3		4.7	%
Other		107.9		96.8			89.7	%		2.0		2.1	%
Total non-covered	$	5,111.7	$	4,335.4	(1)		84.8	%	$	289.9		6.7	%
Total	$	5,740.6	$	4,735.4			82.5	%	$	366.1		7.7	%

(1) The carrying amount for total covered loans represents a discount from the total gross customer balance of $228.9 million or 36.4%. The total carrying amount of total non-covered loans represents a discount to the gross customer balance of $776.3 million or 15.2%.

(2) Includes loans greater than 90 days past due.

70

We regularly reassess the performance of the acquired portfolios by comparing actual to expected cash flows for pools of similar loans. For those pools that exhibit performance below expectations which result in the present value of such cash flows being less than the recorded investment of the pool, we record a provision to establish or increase an allowance for losses. For loan pools that perform above expectations such that the present value exceeds the recorded investment of that pool, we will first reverse any previously established allowance and then record an increase in accretable yield, which is then amortized into net income as an increase in net interest income over the remaining life of the pool.

The changes in expected cash flows on certain loan pools during 2013 and 2012, resulted from several factors, which included actual and projected maturity date extensions through renewals of certain loans along with maturity extensions related to workout strategies or borrower requests on other loans, improved precision in the cash flow estimation for acquired loans, actual payment and loss experience on certain loans and changes to the internal risk ratings of certain loans. When actual and projected maturity dates are extended beyond the dates assumed in previous cash flow estimations, the expected lives of those loans are extended and cash flows as well as impairment and accretable yield can change. The Company forecasts the payment stream of each pool of PCI loans at the original acquisition-date valuation as well as at each subsequent re-estimation date; however, previously un-forecasted loan renewals or extensions can occur as the borrowers’ cash flow needs and other circumstances change over time. Cash flow estimates have improved for the acquired loans since the acquisition date as the Company’s lending officers and credit administration department have been in regular contact with each borrower and have developed a fuller understanding of each borrower’s financial condition and business or personal needs. Actual payment experience on certain loans can also change expected cash flows as problem loan resolutions, loan payoffs and prepayments occur. Finally, changes to the risk ratings of certain PCI loans occur based on the Company’s evaluation of the financial condition of its borrowers. As the financial condition and repayment ability of borrowers improve over time, the Company’s policy is to upgrade the risk ratings associated with these loans and increase its cash flow expectations for these loans. Conversely, as the financial condition and repayment ability of borrowers deteriorate over time, the Company’s policy is to downgrade the associated risk ratings and decrease its cash flow expectations for these loans accordingly.

Allowance for Loan Losses

For loans, we have recorded a provision to establish an allowance against loan losses. At September 30, 2013, the allowance for loan losses was $56.4 million of which $17.3 million related to loans we originated or acquired non-PCI loans, and $39.1 million was associated with PCI loans. At December 31, 2012, the allowance for loan losses was $57.3 million of which $17.4 million related to loans we originated or acquired non-PCI loans, and $39.8 million was associated with PCI loans.

Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses

For non PCI loans, the allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio. Our formalized process for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the resultant need, if any, for periodic provisions to the allowance charged to income, includes both individual loan analyses and loan pool analyses. Individual loan analyses are periodically performed on loan relationships of a significant size, or when otherwise deemed necessary, and are performed primarily on commercial real estate and other commercial loans. The result is that commercial real estate loans and commercial loans are divided into the following risk categories: Pass, Special Mention, Substandard and Loss. The allowance consists of specific and general components. When appropriate, a specific reserve will be established for individual loans based upon the risk classifications and the estimated potential for loss. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. Otherwise, we estimate an allowance for each risk category.

Home equity loans, indirect auto loans, residential loans and consumer loans generally are not analyzed individually or separately identified for impairment disclosures. These loans are grouped into pools and assigned risk categories based on their current payment status and management’s assessment of risk inherent in the various types of loans. The allocations are based on the same factors mentioned above. However, should such loans exceeding certain size thresholds exhibit signs of impairment, they are individually evaluated for impairment.

For PCI loans, the allowance for loan losses is a measure of impairment based upon our most recent estimates of expected cash flows. It totaled approximately $39.1 million as of September 30, 2013. Our estimation of expected cash flows, which is used to determine the need for provisions to or reversals of the allowance every reporting period, is determined by assigning loan probability of default (“PD’s”) and loss given default (“LGD’s”) assumptions, amongst other assumptions such as prepayment speeds and recovery or liquidation timing. For commercial real estate and other commercial loans, we generally assign PD assumptions through the mapping of the following loan level risk ratings: Pass, Watch, Sub-Performing and Non-Performing. For home equity loans, residential loans, and consumer loans, PD is determined by mapping payment performance and delinquency status to market based default assumptions. Estimated loan to value ratios, determined using current appraisals and/or real estate indices, are used to derive LGD assumptions for real estate collateralized loans.

Senior management and our Board of Directors review this calculation and the underlying assumptions on a routine basis not less frequently than quarterly.

The acquisitions of our initial banking operations during 2010, the acquisition of Capital Bank Corp. and Green Bankshares during the first and third quarter of 2011, respectively and the acquisition of Southern Community in the fourth quarter of 2012, resulted in significant purchase accounting adjustments to record acquired assets and assumed liabilities at fair value. The most significant adjustments related to loans that were initially recorded at values reflecting estimated fair values as of the various acquisition dates. Due to these accounting adjustments, no allowance for loan losses was recorded for acquired loans upon acquisition.

71

The provision for loan losses is a charge to income in the current period to establish or replenish the allowance and maintain it at a level that management has determined to be adequate to absorb estimated incurred losses in the loan portfolio for originated loans. A provision for loan losses is also required for any unfavorable changes in expected cash flows related to pools of purchased impaired loans. The provision for loan losses and expectations of cash flows may be impacted by many factors, including changes in the value of real estate collateralizing loans, net charge-offs and credit losses incurred, changes in loans outstanding, changes in impaired loans, historical loss rates and the mix of loan types. The provision for loan losses was $1.0 million and $5.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $10.9 million and $17.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, $11.6 million of the provision for loan losses reflects the allowance for loan losses established for loans originated by us and non-PCI acquired loans, of which $7.8 million related to a single commercial credit relationship associated with suspected fraud. This provision was partially offset by $0.7 million of net impairment reversals related to favorable changes in estimates of expected cash flows in certain pools of purchased impaired loans.

As the majority of our acquired loans are considered PCI loans, our provision for loan losses in future periods will be most significantly influenced in the short term by the differences between the actual credit losses resulting from the resolution of problem loans and the estimated credit losses used in determining the estimated fair values of purchased impaired loans as of their acquisition dates. For loans originated by us, the provision for loan losses will be affected by the loss potential of impaired loans and trends in the delinquency of loans, non-performing loans and net charge offs, which cannot be reasonably predicted.

Management continuously monitors and actively manages the credit quality of the entire loan portfolio and will continue to recognize the provision required to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level.

72

Changes affecting the allowance for loan losses are summarized below:

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	56,832		$	45,472		$	57,262	$	34,749
Charge-offs:
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate		—			220			92		220
Other commercial C&D		50			—			152		83
Multifamily commercial real estate		—			—			—		—
1-4 family residential C&D		—			—			—		—
Total commercial real estate		50			220			244		303
Owner occupied commercial real estate		—
Commercial and industrial		544			49			9,555		—
Lease financing		—			—			—		52
Total commercial		544			49			9,555		52
1-4 family residential		9			—			37		—
Home Equity		3			515			1,370		1,267
Consumer		685			444			2,066		896
Total consumer		697			959			3,473		2,163
Other		654			(404	)		2,063		1,172
Total charge-offs	$	1,945		$	824		$	15,335	$	3,690
Recoveries:
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate		11			224			76		986
Other commercial C&D		135			278			755		328
Multifamily commercial real estate		—			—			41		—
1-4 family residential C&D		2			1			25		1
Total commercial real estate		148			503			897		1,315
Owner occupied commercial real estate		17			237			283		251
Commercial and industrial		78			35			738		184
Lease financing		—			—			—		—
Total commercial		95			272			1,021		435
1-4 family residential		60			35			108		83
Home Equity		(117	)		46			338		65
Consumer		120			38			417		142
Total consumer		63			119			863		290
Other		216			274			832		733
Total recoveries	$	522		$	1,168		$	3,613	$	2,773
Net charge-offs (recoveries)		1,423			(344	)		11,722		917
Provision for loan losses		984			5,771			10,853		17,755
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	56,393		$	51,587		$	56,393	$	51,587

73

No portion of the allowance allocated to non-PCI loans is in any way restricted to any individual loan or group of originated or non-PCI loans, and the entirety of such allowance is available to absorb probable incurred credit losses from any and all such loans. The following table represents management’s best estimate the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for non-PCI loans to the various segments of the loan portfolio based on information available as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The following table allocates the allowance for loan losses for non-PCI loans by loan category as of the dates indicated:

	September 30, 2013							December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Non PCI Loan Balance		Allowance for Non PCI Loans		Percent of Non PCI Loans			Non PCI Loan Balance		Allowance for Non PCI Loans		Percent of Non PCI Loans
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	260,773	$	1,399		0.5	%	$	181,065	$	1,461		0.8	%
Other commercial C&D		64,490		1,644		2.5	%		55,967		1,810		3.2	%
Multifamily commercial real estate		26,150		109		0.4	%		27,078		129		0.5	%
1-4 family residential C&D		57,934		1,115		1.9	%		42,208		943		2.2	%
Total commercial real estate	$	409,347	$	4,267		1.0	%	$	306,318	$	4,343		1.4	%
Owner occupied commercial real		657,677		2,572		0.4	%		556,025		2,943		0.5	%
Commercial and industrial		530,470		5,330		1.0	%		454,575		5,920		1.3	%
Lease financing		2,554		3		0.1	%		—		—		0.0	%
Total commercial	$	1,190,701	$	7,905		0.7	%	$	1,010,600	$	8,863		0.9	%
1-4 family residential		356,423		2,217		0.6	%		249,573		1,915		0.8	%
Home Equity		265,106		358		0.1	%		284,097		376		0.1	%
Consumer		143,629		2,153		1.5	%		108,512		1,568		1.4	%
Total consumer	$	765,158	$	4,728		0.6	%	$	642,182	$	3,859		0.6	%
Other		50,530		376		0.7	%		40,480		377		0.9	%
Total	$	2,415,736	$	17,276		0.7	%	$	1,999,580	$	17,442		0.9	%

Criticized and Classified Loans

Loans with the following attributes are categorized as criticized and classified loans: (1) a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention; (2) inadequate protection by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged; or (3) weaknesses which make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The following table summarizes criticized and classified loans at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	September 30, 2013(1)						December 31, 2012(1)
(Dollars in thousands)	Covered		Non- Covered		Total		Covered		Non- Covered		Total
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	$	25,018	$	131,222	$	156,240	$	32,574	$	187,405	$	219,979
Other commercial C&D		15,778		123,057		138,835		27,324		172,245		199,569
Multifamily commercial real estate		3,451		9,758		13,209		3,289		17,683		20,972
1-4 family residential C&D		—		12,315		12,315		4,599		14,218		18,817
Total commercial real estate		44,247		276,352		320,599		67,786		391,551		459,337
Owner occupied commercial real estate		29,349		89,927		119,276		31,280		124,689		155,969
Commercial and industrial		1,142		56,514		57,656		5,097		78,935		84,032
Lease		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial		30,491		146,441		176,932		36,377		203,624		240,001
1-4 family residential		15,728		67,279		83,007		26,124		96,502		122,626
Home equity		7,155		13,577		20,732		10,126		20,561		30,687
Consumer		33		1,374		1,407		—		2,525		2,525
Total consumer		22,916		82,230		105,146		36,250		119,588		155,838
Other		867		11,839		12,706		4,187		13,296		17,483
Total	$	98,521	$	516,862	$	615,383	$	144,600	$	728,059	$	872,659

(1) PCI and Non-PCI loans are included in the balances presented.

74

Total criticized and classified loans as of September 30, 2013 declined $257.3 million as compared to December 31, 2012 as $53.4 million of transfers to other real estate owned, and $314.2 million of pay downs, charge offs and upgrades were partially offset by $110.3 million of downgrades.

Impaired Loans

Non-performing loans and impaired loans are defined differently. Some loans may be included in both categories, whereas other loans may only be included in one category. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the loan contract. Generally, residential mortgages, commercial and commercial real estate loans exceeding certain size thresholds established by management are individually evaluated for impairment. Non-accrual loans and restructured loans where loan term concessions benefiting the borrowers have been made are generally designated as impaired.

Within the context of the accounting for impaired loans described in the preceding paragraph, other than the PCI loans described above, there were one consumer loan and two commercial loans which were individually evaluated for impairment as of September 30, 2013. The allowance for loan losses was $1 thousand for the consumer loan and $64 thousand for the two commercial loans as of September 30, 2013.

As discussed in the preceding section “Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses” , based upon the most recent estimates of pool expected cash flows, a reversal of previously recorded impairment on purchased credit impaired loans of approximately $0.7 million was recorded during the first nine months of 2013.

Due to the pool method of accounting for purchased credit impaired loans, non-performing PCI loans are reported as 90 days past due and still accruing/accreting. Going forward, additional acquired loans not classified as purchased credit impaired and loans originated by us may become impaired and will be classified as such. Impaired loans also include loans which were not classified as non-accrual, but otherwise meet the criteria for classification as an impaired loan (i.e., loans for which the collection of all principal and interest amounts as specified in the original loan contract are not expected, or where management has substantial doubt that the collection will be as specified, but is still expected to occur in its entirety). In our evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we consider (1) purchased credit impaired loans and loans classified as impaired, (2) our historical portfolio loss experience and trends and (3) certain other quantitative and qualitative factors.

75

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include accruing/accreting loans delinquent 90 days or more, non-accrual loans and investment securities, repossessed personal property and other real estate. Non-PCI loans and investments in debt securities are placed on non-accrual status when management has concerns relating to the ability to collect the principal and interest and generally when such assets are 90 days past due. Non-performing assets were as follows:

	September 30, 2013									December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Covered			Non-Covered			Total			Covered			Non-Covered			Total
Total non-accrual loans	$	1,256		$	12,567		$	13,823		$	2,792		$	11,219		$	14,011
Accruing/accreting loans delinquent 90 days or more		41,008			220,462			261,470			73,453			278,617			352,070
Total non-performing loans	$	42,264		$	233,029		$	275,293		$	76,245		$	289,836		$	366,081
Non-accrual investment securities		—			329			329			—			323			323
Repossessed personal property (primarily indirect auto loans)		—			132			132			—			268			268
Other real estate owned		27,288			102,366			129,654			35,935			118,158			154,093
Total non-performing assets	$	69,552		$	335,856		$	405,408		$	112,180		$	408,585		$	520,765
Allowance for loan losses	$	13,416		$	42,977		$	56,393		$	16,857		$	40,405		$	57,262
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets		1.05	%		5.09	%		6.14	%		1.54	%		5.59	%		7.13	%
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans		0.94	%		5.20	%		6.15	%		1.61	%		6.12	%		7.73	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans		31.74	%		18.44	%		20.48	%		22.11	%		13.94	%		15.64	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-PCI loans								0.72	%								0.87	%

Total non-performing assets at September 30, 2013 declined by $115.4 million to $405.4 million compared to $520.8 million at December 31, 2012. The change in non-performing assets was primarily attributable to a decline in non-performing loans of $90.8 million. The decline in non-performing loans was attributable to $138.1 million in resolutions and $53.4 million in transfers to other real estate owned through foreclosures or receipt of deeds in lieu of foreclosures, offset by $100.7 million of loans that became non-performing.

Investment Securities

Investment securities represent a significant portion of our assets. We invest in a variety of securities, including obligations of U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored entities, including mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities, bank eligible obligations of states or political subdivisions, privately issued mortgage-backed securities, bank eligible corporate obligations, mutual funds and limited types of equity securities.

Our investment activities are governed internally by a written, board-approved policy. The investment policy is carried out by our Treasury department. Investment strategies are reviewed by the Audit Committee based on the interest rate environment, balance sheet mix, actual and anticipated loan demand, funding opportunities and our overall interest rate sensitivity. In general, the investment portfolio is managed in a manner appropriate to the attainment of the following goals: (1) to provide a margin of liquid assets sufficient to meet unanticipated deposit and loan fluctuations and overall funds management objectives; (2) to provide eligible securities to secure public funds and other borrowings; and (3) to earn the maximum return on funds invested that is commensurate with meeting our first two goals.

76

Our investment securities consisted primarily of U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, which expose us to a lower degree of credit and liquidity risk. The following table sets forth our investment securities as of September 30, 2013:

(Dollars in thousands)	Book Value		Fair Value		Percent of Total Portfolio			Yield			Modified Duration (years)
Security Type
Available-for-Sale
Asset-backed securities	$	139,148	$	137,961		19.2	%		0.62	%		4.04
Marketable equity securities		946		946		0.1	%		NA			NA
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		574,051		574,401		80.1	%		1.54	%		3.24
Industrial revenue bond		3,750		3,965		0.6	%		2.25	%		0.24
Collateralized debt obligations		505		329		0.0	%		0.00	%		NA
Total	$	718,400	$	717,602		100.0	%		1.36	%		3.37
Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government agencies	$	15,192	$	14,885		3.1	%		2.86	%		5.59
State and political subdivisions—tax exempt		14,172		14,189		2.9	%		3.01	%		4.92
State and political subdivisions—taxable		547		541		0.1	%		3.85	%		4.78
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		453,075		453,798		93.9	%		2.23	%		4.09
Total	$	482,986	$	483,413		100.0	%		2.27	%		4.16

77

Contractual maturities of investment securities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations without call or prepayment penalties. Other securities include mortgage-backed securities and marketable equity securities which are not due at a single maturity date. The following table segments our investment portfolio by maturity date:

(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Year					After One Year Within Five Years					After Five Years Within Ten Years					After Ten Years					Other Securities
As of September 30, 2013	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount
Available-for-Sale
Asset-backed securities	$	—		—		$	—		—		$	58,065		0.62	%	$	79,896		0.62	%	$	—
Marketable equity securities		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			946
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			574,401
Industrial revenue bond		—		—			—		—			—		—			3,965		2.25	%		—
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—			—		—			—		—			329		0.00	%		—
Total	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	58,065		0.62	%	$	84,190		0.69	%	$	575,347
Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government agencies	$	—		—		$	—		—		$	—		—		$	14,885		2.86	%	$	—
States and political subdivisions—tax-exempt		678		0.83	%		1,134		2.06	%		7,197		3.03	%		5,180		3.49	%		—
States and political subdivisions—taxable		—		—			—		—			—		—			541		3.85	%		—
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			453,798
Total	$	678		0.83	%	$	1,134		2.06	%	$	7,197		3.03	%	$	20,606		3.05	%	$	453,798

(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Year					After One Year Within Five Years					After Five Years Within Ten Years					After Ten Years					Other Securities
As of December 31, 2012	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government agencies	$	—		—		$	—		—		$	—		—		$	8,015		2.07	%	$	—
States and political subdivisions—tax-exempt		978		1.59	%		1,823		2.88	%		8,267		3.72	%		6,147		4.59	%		—
States and political subdivisions—taxable		—		—			—		—			—		—			573		5.42	%		—
Marketable equity securities		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			2,719
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		—		—			—		—			—		—			—		—			973,853
Industrial revenue bond		—		—			—		—			—		—			3,800		2.11	%		—
Corporate bonds		—		—			—		—			—		—			26		0.00	%		—
Trust preferred securities		—		—			—		—			—		—			246		7.95	%		—
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—			—		—			—		—			297		0.00	%		—
Total	$	978		1.59	%	$	1,823		2.88	%	$	8,267		3.72	%	$	19,104		3.03	%	$	976,572

78

The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value for the major categories of our investment portfolio for each reported period:

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
As of September 30, 2013:
Available-for-Sale
Asset-backed securities	$	139,148	$	—	$	1,187	$	137,961
Marketable equity securities		946		—		—		946
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		574,051		4,229		3,879		574,401
Industrial revenue bond		3,750		215		—		3,965
Collateralized debt obligations		505		—		176		329
	$	718,400	$	4,444	$	5,242	$	717,602
Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Government agencies	$	15,192	$	—	$	307	$	14,885
States and political subdivisions—tax exempt		14,172		44		27		14,189
States and political subdivisions—taxable		547		—		6		541
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		453,075		1,520		797		453,798
	$	482,986	$	1,564	$	1,137	$	483,413

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
As of December 31, 2012:
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government agencies	$	7,913	$	102	$	—	$	8,015
States and political subdivisions—tax exempt		16,019		1,196		—		17,215
States and political subdivisions—taxable		509		64		—		573
Marketable equity securities		2,731		—		12		2,719
Mortgage-backed securities—residential issued by government sponsored entities		959,863		15,048		1,058		973,853
Industrial revenue bond		3,750		50		—		3,800
Corporate bonds		26		—		—		26
Trust preferred securities		250		—		4		246
Collateralized debt obligations		505		—		208		297
	$	991,566	$	16,460	$	1,282	$	1,006,744

We regularly review each investment security for impairment based on criteria that include the extent to which cost exceeds the estimated fair value, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer(s) and our ability and intention with regard to holding the security to maturity. Future declines in the fair value of securities may result in impairment charges which may be material to our financial condition and results of operations. More specifically, our impairment analysis is based on the following: (1) whether it is “more likely than not” we would have to sell a security prior to recovery of the amortized cost; (2) whether we intend to sell the security; and (3) whether or not we expect to recover our recorded investment on an amortized cost basis based on credit characteristics of the investment. If, based upon our analysis, any of those conditions exist for a given security, we would generally be required to record an impairment charge in the amount of the difference between the carrying amount and estimated fair value of such security.

The Company owns a collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) collateralized by trust preferred securities issued primarily by banks and several insurance companies. Valuation and measurement of OTTI of this investment falls under ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The Company compares the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to ensure there are no adverse changes in the expected cash flows. The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow valuation model which considers the structure and term of the CDO and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults by issuers of the underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates. Interest payment deferrals are generally treated as defaults even though they may not actually result in defaults. Management engaged an independent third party valuation firm to estimate the fair value and credit loss potential of this security.

79

Based on this analysis, the estimated fair value of the CDO increased by $32 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. In addition, the credit loss potential of the CDO declined. Since previous credit impairment was recognized, no recovery is allowed under U.S. GAAP. The CDO was recorded at fair value and the remaining unrealized loss was recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

The table below presents a rollforward for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 of the OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings.

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013		Three Months Ended September 30, 2012		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
Beginning balance	$	660	$	660	$	660	$	616
Additions/subtractions:
Credit losses recognized during the period		54		—		54		44
Ending balance	$	714	$	660	$	714	$	660

Deposits

Our strategy is to fund asset growth primarily with low-cost customer deposits in order to maintain a stable liquidity profile and net interest margin. As of September 30, 2013, our core deposits, which we define as demand deposit accounts, savings and money market accounts, decreased by $113.5 million and our time deposit accounts decreased by $491 million. The decline in core deposit balances was primarily driven by withdrawals of public funds with unattractive rates and/or collateral requirements in the second quarter as we are building our deposit base around service-oriented customer relationships. Core deposit balances remained relatively flat during the third quarter as we improve our core deposits mix. Checking account balances grew by $34.1 million, offsetting run-off in money markets. The contractual rate on core deposits declined to 0.47% as of September 30, 2013 from 0.66% as of December 31, 2012. The decrease in certificates of deposit accounts was a result of continued planned shrinkage in high-cost legacy time deposits. The following table sets forth the balances and average contractual rates payable to customers on our deposits, segmented by account type as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	September 30, 2013								December 31, 2012								Sequential Change
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent of Total			Weighted Average Contractual Rate			Balance		Percent of Total			Weighted Average Contractual Rate			Amount			Percent
Non-interest-bearing demand deposit accounts	$	937,152		18	%		0.00	%	$	895,274		15	%		0.00	%	$	41,878			4.7	%
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		1,281,036		24	%		0.15	%		1,288,742		22	%		0.22	%		(7,706	)		(0.6	)%
Savings		531,655		10	%		0.21	%		492,187		9	%		0.30	%		39,468			8.0	%
Money market		938,854		18	%		0.21	%		1,125,967		19	%		0.32	%		(187,113	)		(16.6	)%
Total core deposits	$	3,688,697		70	%		0.14	%	$	3,802,170		65	%		0.21	%	$	(113,473	)		(3.0	)%
Customer time deposits		1,529,395		29	%		1.22	%		2,002,936		34	%		1.46	%		(473,541	)		(23.6	)%
Wholesale time deposits		50,377		1	%		2.43	%		67,762		1	%		2.45	%		(17,385	)		(25.7	)%
Total time deposits	$	1,579,772		30	%		1.26	%	$	2,070,698		35	%		1.49	%	$	(490,926	)		(23.7	)%
Total deposits	$	5,268,469		100	%		0.47	%	$	5,872,868		100	%		0.66	%	$	(604,399	)		(10.3	)%

80

The following table sets forth our average deposits and the average rates expensed for the periods indicated:

	September 30, 2013					December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Amount		Average Rate			Average Amount		Average Rate
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	914,260		0.00	%	$	772,404		0.00	%
Interest-bearing deposits
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		1,260,477		0.16	%		1,110,878		0.26	%
Money market		977,698		0.22	%		945,432		0.42	%
Savings deposit		524,728		0.21	%		384,104		0.31	%
Time deposits (1)		1,660,373		0.91	%		2,039,301		1.05	%
Total	$	5,337,536		0.46	%	$	5,252,119		0.56	%

(1) The average rates on time deposits include the amortization of premiums on time deposits assumed in connection with the acquisitions. Such premiums were required to be recorded by the acquisition method of accounting to initially record these deposits at their fair values as of the respective acquisition dates.

The following table sets forth our time deposits segmented by months to maturity and deposit amount:

	September 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Time Deposits of $100 and Greater		Time Deposits of Less Than $100		Total
Months to maturity:
Three or less	$	137,940	$	144,092	$	282,032
Over Three to Six		95,611		120,800		216,411
Over Six to Twelve		126,712		209,133		335,845
Over Twelve		360,129		385,355		745,484
Total	$	720,392	$	859,380	$	1,579,772

81

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital

In order to maintain a conservative risk profile, we operate with a prudent cushion of capital in relation to regulatory requirements and to the risk of our assets and business model. For planning purposes, we expect to operate with a minimum capital target equal to an 8% leverage ratio (defined as Tier 1 capital equal to 8% of average tangible assets), which would be in excess of regulatory standards for “well-capitalized” banks. We believe the 8% target is appropriate for our business model because of our conservative loan underwriting policies, investment portfolio composition, funding strategy, interest rate risk management limits and liquidity risk profile and because of the experience of our senior management team and Board of Directors.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had a 14.75% and 13.92% tangible common equity ratio, respectively. We calculate tangible common equity, tangible assets and the tangible common equity ratio, which are non-GAAP measures, because we believe they are useful for both investors and management as these are measures commonly used by financial institutions, regulators and investors to measure the capital adequacy of financial institutions. The tangible common equity ratio is calculated as tangible common shareholders’ equity divided by tangible assets. Tangible common equity is calculated as total shareholders’ equity less preferred stock and less goodwill and other intangible assets, net and tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets, net. We believe these measures facilitate comparison of the quality and composition of the Company’s capital over time and in comparison to its competitors. These non-GAAP measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results reported under GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies and should not be viewed as a substitution for shareholders’ equity or total assets. The following table provides reconciliations of tangible common equity and tangible common equity ratio to GAAP total common shareholders’ equity and tangible assets to GAAP total assets:

(Dollars in millions)	As of September 30, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
Total shareholders’ equity	$	1,108		$	1,156
Less: Preferred stock		—			—
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		(157	)		(161	)
Tangible common shareholders’ equity	$	951		$	995
Total assets	$	6,601		$	7,307
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets, net		(157	)		(161	)
Tangible assets	$	6,444		$	7,146
Tangible common equity ratio		14.75	%		13.92	%

The Company operates with a significant level of excess capital above regulatory requirements (see the table below for the historical capital ratios as well as minimum and well capitalized ratio requirements). As of September 30, 2013, we had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 14.5%, which provides us with $286.7 million in excess capital relative to the 10% Tier 1 leverage ratio required under the OCC Operating Agreement and $415.1 million in excess capital relative to our longer-term target of 8%. As of September 30, 2013, we had cash and securities equal to 20.8% of total assets, representing $380.2 million of excess liquidity in excess of our target of 15%. As of September 30, 2013, Capital Bank, N.A. had a 12.8% Tier 1 leverage ratio, a 17.4% Tier 1 risk-based ratio and an 18.7% total risk-based capital ratio.

As of December 31, 2012, we had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 13.7%, which provides us with $257.9 million in excess capital relative to the 10% Tier 1 leverage ratio required under the OCC Operating Agreement and $399.2 million in excess capital relative to our longer-term target of 8%. As of December 31, 2012, we had cash and securities equal to 23.8% of total assets, representing $645.6 million of excess liquidity in excess of our target of 15%. As of December 31, 2012, Capital Bank, N.A. had a 12.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio, a 17.6% Tier 1 risk-based ratio and an 18.8% total risk-based capital ratio.

At present, the OCC Operating Agreement requires Capital Bank, N.A. to maintain total capital equal to at least 12% of risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital equal to at least 11% of risk-weighted assets and a minimum leverage ratio of 10%. We expect to operate under this capital standard until we demonstrate that we have stabilized our acquired operations, improved our profitability and reduced legacy problem assets.

82

The minimum regulatory capital ratios along with the actual ratios for us and Capital Bank, N.A. as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are presented in the following tables.

	Well Capitalized Requirement			Adequately Capitalized Requirement			September 30, 2013 Actual			December 31, 2012 Actual
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
CBF Consolidated		NA		³	4.0	%		14.5	%		13.7	%
Capital Bank, N.A. (formerly NAFH National Bank)	³	5.0	%	³	4.0	%		12.8	%		12.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
CBF Consolidated		NA		³	4.0	%		19.7	%		19.9	%
Capital Bank, N.A. (formerly NAFH National Bank)	³	6.0	%	³	4.0	%		17.4	%		17.6	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
CBF Consolidated		NA		³	8.0	%		21.0	%		21.2	%
Capital Bank, N.A. (formerly NAFH National Bank)	³	10.0	%	³	8.0	%		18.7	%		18.8	%

(Dollars in millions)	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
CBF Consolidated:
Tier 1 Capital	$	930		$	964
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio		14.5	%		13.7	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio		19.7	%		19.9	%
Total Risk-Based Ratio		21.0	%		21.2	%
Excess Tier 1 Capital:
vs. 10% regulatory requirement	$	287		$	258
vs. 8% target		415			399
Capital Bank, N.A.:
Tier 1 Capital	$	821		$	850
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio		12.8	%		12.0	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio		17.4	%		17.6	%
Total Risk-Based Ratio		18.7	%		18.8	%
Excess Tier 1 Capital:
vs. 10% regulatory requirement	$	179		$	143
vs. 8% target		307			285

In July 2013, the U.S. banking regulators adopted a final rule which implements the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, and certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule establishes an integrated regulatory capital framework and introduces the “Standardized Approach” for risk weighted assets, which will replace the Basel I risk-based guidance for determining risk-weighted assets as of January 1, 2015 (the date we expect to become subject to the new rules). We do not believe adoption of the final rules and relevant provisions will have a significant impact on our operations.

Liquidity

Liquidity involves our ability to raise funds to support asset growth or reduce assets to meet deposit withdrawals and other borrowing needs, to maintain reserve requirements and to otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. To mitigate liquidity risk, our strategy is to fund asset growth primarily with low-cost customer deposits. We also operate under a liquidity policy and contingent liquidity plan that require us to monitor indicators of potential liquidity risk, utilize cash flow projection models to forecast liquidity needs, identify alternative back-up sources of liquidity and maintain a predetermined cushion of cash and liquid securities at 15% of total assets.

Our liquidity needs are met primarily by our cash position, growth in core deposits, cash flow from our amortizing investment and loan portfolios (including scheduled payments, prepayments, and maturities from portfolios of loans and investment securities) and reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Our ability to borrow funds from non-deposit sources provides additional flexibility in meeting our liquidity needs. Short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and brokered deposits. We also utilize longer-term borrowings when management determines that the pricing and maturity options available through these sources create cost effective options for funding asset growth and satisfying capital needs. Our long-term borrowings include structured repurchase agreements and subordinated notes underlying our trust preferred securities.

83

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, cash and liquid securities totaled 20.8%, and 23.8% of assets, respectively, providing us with excess liquidity relative to our planning target, and the ratio of wholesale to total funding was 5.2% and 6.4% respectively, below our planning target. In addition to maintaining a stable core deposit base, we maintain adequate liquidity primarily through the use of investment securities, short term investments such as federal funds sold and unused borrowing capacity. We hold investments in FHLB stock for the purpose of maintaining credit lines with the FHLB. The credit availability is based on a percentage of the subsidiary bank’s total assets as reported in their most recent quarterly financial information submitted to the FHLB and subject to the pledging of sufficient collateral. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were $1.4 million in advances outstanding. In addition, we had $25.6 million and $25.5 million in letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively and collateral available under our agreements with the FHLB provided for incremental borrowing availability of up to approximately $190.1 million and $296.4 million, respectively.

We believe that we have adequate funding sources through unused borrowing capacity from the FHLB, unpledged investment securities, cash on hand and on deposit in other financial institutions, loan principal repayment and potential asset maturities and sales to meet our foreseeable liquidity requirements and contractual obligations.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, our holding company had cash of approximately $118.5 million and $125.4 million, respectively. This cash is available for providing capital support to our subsidiary banks and for other general corporate purposes, including potential future acquisitions. The decline in cash at our holding company was primarily due to extinguishment of $42.5 million of high coupon trust preferred securities as well as the completion of the $50.0 million common stock repurchase Plan and new common stock repurchase of $12.9 million. Offsetting this decrease was $105.0 million dividend up from the Company’s subsidiary Capital Bank N.A which was approved by the OCC on September 5, 2013. We calculate tangible book value, and tangible book value per share, which are non-GAAP measures because we believe they are useful for both investors and management as these are measures commonly used by financial institutions, regulators and investors to measure the capital adequacy of financial institutions. Tangible book value is equal to book value less goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net of related deferred tax liabilities. We believe these measures facilitate comparison of the quality and composition of the Company’s capital over time and in comparison to its competitors. In addition, our Board of Directors reviews tangible book value in evaluating the performance of management. These non-GAAP measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results reported under GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies and should not be viewed as a substitute for total shareholders’ equity. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of tangible book value and tangible book value per share to total shareholders’ equity, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure:

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	As of September 30, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
Total shareholders’ equity	$	1,107,825		$	1,155,343
Less: Goodwill		(131,987	)		(131,987	)
Less: Core deposit intangibles, net of taxes		(15,075	)		(17,491	)
Tangible Book Value	$	960,763		$	1,005,865
Book Value Per Share	$	21.13		$	20.69
Tangible Book Value Per Share	$	18.33		$	18.01

The amounts reported above for book and tangible book value per share do not include any adjustments for approximately $196.8 million in net favorable pre-tax differences between the fair values for assets and liabilities and their respective carrying amounts as of September 30, 2013. The most significant of such differences is the differential between the carrying value and estimated fair value of our loan portfolio. As described in Note 14 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, the estimated fair value of loans exceeded their carrying value by approximately $198.3. This difference arises as acquired loans were initially recorded at acquisition date fair values which incorporated management’s expectation of lifetime credit losses. As our loan cash flow expectations and experience has generally improved from our original expectations and the market interest rates for similar instruments have generally declined, our estimates of fair value have increased. These estimates utilize discounted cash flows as a primary valuation approach incorporating collateral value, prepayment and credit risk (including consumer credit scores where applicable) along with the LIBOR/Swap curve for market interest rates. For loans with higher credit risk ratings, incremental spreads were added for credit and liquidity factors. Estimated fair values for commercial loans were determined using syndicated loan prices and spreads, survey data from the Federal Reserve e2 release, and rated corporate bonds. The Company’s internal risk ratings were mapped to the Federal Reserve e2 and Moody’s rating categories. Estimated fair values for commercial real estate loans also incorporated commercial mortgage backed security securitization prices and spreads. Estimated fair values for consumer loans were determined using product-specific survey rate data from a leading provider of financial information. Estimated fair values for residential mortgage loans were determined using mortgage backed security option-adjusted spreads, with incremental spreads added credit and liquidity. Credit spreads were sourced from third party survey data of mortgage banking activities from a leading provider of financial information.

84

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk Management

Interest rate risk management is carried out through our Asset Liability Committee, which consists of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Treasurer, business unit heads and certain other officers. To manage interest rate risk, our Board of Directors has established quantitative and qualitative guidelines with respect to our net interest income exposure and how interest rate shocks affect our financial performance. Consistent with industry practice, we measure interest rate risk by utilizing the concept of economic value of equity, which is the intrinsic value of assets, less the intrinsic value of liabilities. Economic value of equity does not take into account management intervention and assumes the new rate environment is constant and the change is instantaneous. Further, economic value of equity only evaluates risk to the current balance sheet. Therefore, in addition to this measurement, we also evaluate and consider the impact of interest rate shocks on other business factors, such as forecasted net interest income for subsequent years.

Management continually reviews and refines its interest rate risk management process in response to the changing economic climate. Currently, our model projects minus 300, minus 200, minus 100, 0, plus 100, plus 200 and plus 300 basis point changes to evaluate our interest rate sensitivity and to determine whether specific action is needed to improve the current structure, either through economic hedges and matching strategies or by utilizing derivative instruments. In the current interest rate environment, management believes the minus 200 and minus 300 basis point scenarios are highly unlikely.

Based upon the current interest rate environment, as of September 30, 2013, our sensitivity to interest rate risk was as follows:

(Dollars in millions)	Next 12 Months Net  Interest Income						Economic Value of Equity
Interest Rate Change in Basis Points	$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change
300	$	17.5			7.02	%	$	84.8			6.24	%
200		10.9			4.36	%		60.9			4.49	%
100		4.7			1.88	%		32.9			2.42	%
—		—			0.00	%		—			0.00	%
(100)		(8.9	)		(3.55	)%		(62.5	)		(4.60	)%
(200)		(22.5	)		(9.00	)%		(155.7	)		(11.47	)%
(300)		(26.0	)		(10.42	)%		(205.3	)		(15.12	)%

We used many assumptions to calculate the impact of changes in interest rates on our portfolio, and actual results may not be similar to projections due to several factors, including the timing and frequency of rate changes, market conditions and the shape of the yield curve. Actual results may also differ due to our actions, if any, in response to the changing rates.

In the event the model indicates an unacceptable level of risk, we may take a number of actions to reduce this risk, including the sale of a portion of our available for sale investment portfolio or the use of risk management strategies such as interest rate swaps and caps. Certain key rates in the simulations model (such as federal funds at zero to 0.25%) are at unprecedented low levels that can decline very little, if at all, and remain a positive number. Consequently, the simulations in the declining-rate scenarios are viewed by us and many other depository institutions as being remote and not meaningful. Therefore, declining rate scenario simulations are not currently being used in our assessment and management of interest rate risk. As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all of the limits and policies established by our Board of Directors that we believe are reasonably possible.

Inflation Risk Management

Inflation has an important impact on the growth of total assets in the banking industry and creates a need to increase equity capital to higher than normal levels in order to maintain an appropriate equity-to-assets ratio. We cope with the effects of inflation by managing our interest rate sensitivity position through our asset/liability management program, and by periodically adjusting our pricing of services and banking products to take into consideration current costs.

85

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, they have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and are also designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There were no material legal proceedings filed against the Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, nor were there any material developments in existing legal proceedings to which the Company is a party.

Item 1a. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to our risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information regarding our purchases of common shares during the periods indicated:

Period	Total Number of Shares  Purchased		Average Price Paid per  Share		Total Number of Shares  Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be  Purchased Under the Program (1)(2)
July 1 - 31		—		—		—	$	—
August 1 - 31		—		—		—	$	—
September 1 - 30		600,000	$	21.50		600,000	$	87,116,482
Total		600,000	$	21.50		600,000	$	87,116,482

(1) On February 5, 2013 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $50.0 million stock repurchase program.

(2) On September 25, 2013 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $100.0 million stock repurchase program.

86

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable

ITEM 6: EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

31.1	Chief Executive Officer’s certification required under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Chief Financial Officer’s certification required under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Chief Executive Officer’s certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Chief Financial Officer’s certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Users of this data are advised that pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

87

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CAPITAL BANK FINANCIAL CORP.
Date: November 7, 2013	/s/ R. Eugene Taylor
	R. Eugene Taylor
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 7, 2013	/s/ Christopher G. Marshall
	Christopher G. Marshall
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

88