XML 44 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
NATURE OF OPERATIONS, HISTORY AND PRESENTATION(Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Nature of Operations

Nature of Operations

 

General Cannabis Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “GCC”) (formerly, Advanced Cannabis Solutions, Inc.), was incorporated on June 3, 2013 (Inception) and provides products and services to the regulated cannabis industry.  The Company’s primary operations include real estate leasing, shared office space, networking and event services, security and cash management services, industry finance, wholesale supply, and consulting and advisory.

 

Finance and Real Estate

 

The Company’s real estate leasing business primarily includes the acquisition and leasing of cultivation space and related facilities to licensed marijuana growers and dispensary owners for their operations.  As of the date of this report, the Company owns one cultivation property that is located in a suburb of Pueblo, Colorado (the “Pueblo West Property”). The property consists of approximately three acres of land, which includes a 5,000 square foot steel building, and parking lot. The property is zoned for cultivating cannabis and is leased to a medical cannabis grower until December 31, 2022.

 

The Company leases cultivation equipment and facilities to customers in the cannabis industry. The Company may enter into sale lease-back transactions of grow lights, tenant improvements and other grow equipment. The Company’s finance strategy will include providing customized finance, direct term loans and revolving lines of credit to businesses involved in the cultivation and sale of cannabis and related products.

 

In October 2014, the Company purchased a former retail bank located at 6565 East Evans Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80224, which has been branded as The Greenhouse (“The Greenhouse”).  The building is a 16,056 square-foot facility, which will be converted to serve as a leading shared workspace for entrepreneurs, professionals and others serving the cannabis industry.  Clients will be able to lease space to use as offices, meeting rooms, lecture, educational and networking facilities, and individual workstations.

 

Wholesale Supply

 

The Company’s wholesale supply business, GC Supply, is a reseller of supplies to the cannabis market. GC Supply works with industry leaders and innovators to deliver high-quality products that are compliant with applicable regulations and with a focus on products that are manufactured in the United States. GC Supply operates out of a leased, 1,800 square-foot warehouse located in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

 

In September 2015, GCC acquired substantially all of the assets of Chiefton Supply Co. (“CSC”), and established a dba within GCC of Chiefton Supply Co. (“Chiefton”).  Chiefton designs, manufactures, distributes and sells apparel featuring graphic designs.

 

Security

 

In March 2015, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, GC Security, LLC (“GCS”), acquired substantially all of the assets of Iron Protection Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company.  GCS, which will continue to do business as “Iron Protection Group,” provides advanced security, including on-site professionals and video surveillance, to licensed cannabis cultivators and retail shops.

 

Consulting

 

The Company delivers comprehensive consulting services that includes design and construction to approved and licensed cannabis operators, as well as assistance with licensure and related applications for potential cannabis operators. The Company’s business plan is based on the future growth of the regulated cannabis market in the United States. The Company provides general advisory services for business development, facilities design and construction, cultivation and retail operations, marketing and the improvement and expansion of existing operations.

 

Corporate

 

While the Company does not grow, harvest, distribute or sell cannabis or any substances that violate United States law or the Controlled Substances Act, the Company may be irreparably harmed by a change in enforcement by federal or state governments.

  

On April 28, 2015, the Company’s stock was uplisted and resumed quotation on the OTC Market’s OTCQB

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying (a) condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from audited statements and (b) the condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements as of September 30, 2015 and 2014, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “2014 Annual Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 15, 2015.  It is management’s opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation. The financial statements include all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to make the financial statements not misleading as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations expected for the year ending December 31, 2015.

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of GCC, and its five wholly-owned subsidiary companies: (a) ACS Colorado Corp., a Colorado corporation formed in 2013; (b) Advanced Cannabis Solutions Corporation, a Colorado corporation formed in 2013; (c) 6565 E. Evans Avenue LLC (“6565 Evans”), a Colorado limited liability company formed in 2014; (d)  General Cannabis Capital Corporation (“GCCC”), a Colorado corporation formed in 2015; and (e) GCS, a Colorado limited liability company formed in 2015. Advanced Cannabis Solutions Corporation has one wholly-owned subsidiary company, ACS Corp., which was formed in the State of Colorado on June 6, 2013.

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net loss, total assets, or total stockholders’ equity (deficit).

Going Concern

Going Concern

 

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.  The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and, or, obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management believes that actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate additional revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate additional revenues and its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.

 

The Company had an accumulated deficit of $14,517,051 and $7,641,101, respectively, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Business Combinations Policy [Policy Text Block]

Business Combinations

 

Amounts paid for acquisitions are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition.  The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is based on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions provided by management, including expected future cash flows. The Company allocates any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets and liabilities acquired to goodwill.  Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Acquisition-related costs, including advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other costs, are expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. The results of operations of acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date.

Concentration of Cash Balances

Concentration of Cash Balances

 

We maintain our cash balances in financial institutions that from time to time exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (up to $250,000, per financial institution as of September 30, 2015).  At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our deposits did not exceed insured amounts. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill Policy [Policy Text Block]

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

 

Intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationships, non-compete agreements with key employees, and marketing-related intangibles. The Company’s intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of two to ten years. The life assigned to customer relationships acquired is based on management’s estimate of expected customer attrition rate. The attrition rate is estimated based on historical contract longevity and management’s operating experience.

 

Management evaluates the remaining useful life of intangible assets on a periodic basis to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining useful life. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying value of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over the revised remaining useful life Any potential impairment is evaluated based on anticipated undiscounted future cash flows and actual customer attrition.

 

Management monitors the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions, by reporting unit, annually, or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

If it is determined that sufficient indicators of potential impairment exists to require an interim goodwill impairment analysis for a reporting unit, the Company compares the reporting unit’s carrying value to its estimated fair value and, accordingly, performs a second phase of the goodwill impairment test (“Step 2”). Under Step 2, the fair value of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities are estimated, including tangible assets and intangible assets for the purpose of deriving an estimate of the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair v

Debt, Policy

Debt

 

We issue debt that may have separate warrants, conversion features, or no equity-linked attributes.

 

Debt with warrants – When we issue debt with warrants, we treat the warrants as a debt discount, record as a contra-liability against the debt, and amortize the balance over the life of the underlying debt as amortization of debt discount expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  The offset to the contra-liability is recorded as additional paid in capital in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.  We determine the value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (“Black-Scholes”) using the stock price on the date of issuance, the risk free interest rate associated with the life of the debt, and the volatility of our stock.  If the debt is retired early, the associated debt discount is then recognized immediately as amortization of debt discount expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  The debt is treated as conventional debt.

 

Convertible debtderivative treatment – When we issue debt with a  conversion feature, we must first assess whether the conversion feature meets the requirements to be treated as a derivative, as follows:  a) one or more underlyings, typically the price of the company’s stock; b) one or more notional amounts or payment provisions or both, generally the number of shares upon conversion; c) no initial net investment, which typically excludes the amount borrowed; and d) net settlement provisions, which in the case of convertible debt generally means the stock received upon conversion can be readily sold for cash. An embedded equity-linked component that meets the definition of a derivative does not have to be separated from the host instrument if the component qualifies for the scope exception for certain contracts involving an issuer’s own equity.  The scope exception applies if the contract is both a) indexed to its own stock; and b) classified in stockholders’ equity in its statement of financial position.

 

If the conversion feature within convertible debt meets the requirements to be treated as a derivative, we estimate the fair value of the convertible debt derivative using Black-Scholes upon the date of issuance.  If the fair value of the convertible debt derivative is higher than the face value of the convertible debt, the excess is immediately recognized as interest expense.  Otherwise, the fair value of the convertible debt derivative is recorded as a liability with an offsetting amount recorded as a debt discount, which offsets the carrying amount of the debt.  The convertible debt derivative is revalued at the end of each reporting period and any change in fair value is recorded as a gain or loss in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  The debt discount is amortized through interest expense over the life of the debt.

 

Convertible debt – beneficial conversion feature – If the conversion feature is not treated as a derivative, the Company assesses whether it is a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF’).  A BCF exists if the conversion price of the convertible debt instrument is less than the stock price on the commitment date.  This typically occurs when the conversion price is less than the fair value of the stock on the date the instrument was issued.  The value of a BCF is equal to the intrinsic value of the feature, the difference between the conversion price and the common stock into which it is convertible, and is recorded as additional paid in capital and as a debt discount in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.  We amortize the balance over the life of the underlying debt as amortization of debt discount expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  If the debt is retired early, the associated debt discount is then recognized immediately as amortization of debt discount expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

If the conversion feature does not qualify for either the derivative treatment or as a BCF, the convertible debt is treated as traditional debt.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis as earned under contract terms. Specifically, revenue from tenant rentals is recognized on a straight-line basis over the reasonably assured lease term, and when collectability is reasonably assured. Consulting revenue is recognized based upon the payment terms within the contracts; and when collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue relating to our wholesale business is recognized at the time goods are sold.  Security services revenue is recognized as earned and billed to customers on terms agreed upon with the individual customer, usually weekly or bi-monthly.  We reduce revenue for estimated bad debts.

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventory

 

Inventory consisting of wholesale finished goods is stated at the lower-of-cost (first-in, first-out (“FIFO”)) or market value. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred losses of $27,459 and $54,959, respectively for inventory that had a market value below carrying value, included in cost of goods sold in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Segment Reporting, Policy

Reporting Segments

 

Our reporting segments consist of:  a) Finance and Real Estate; b) Wholesale Supply; c) Security; and d) Consulting.  Our Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief decision maker.  As of the date of this filing, the Company’s operations are conducted primarily within the state of Colorado.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

Consolidation Reporting

 

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation: Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”). This standard update is intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. This ASU simplifies consolidation accounting by reducing the number of consolidation models and improves current U.S. GAAP by (1) placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest; (2) reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity; and (3) changing consolidation conclusions for public and private companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or variable interest entities. The amendments in ASU 2015-02 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Debt Issuance Costs

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. This standard update requires an entity to present debt issuance costs on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability as opposed to an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The update is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued, and the new guidance would be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. The adoption of this standard update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.