Form 10-12B/A

Presentation of Information

Unilife Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 2, 2009. As of the date of the filing of this registration statement, Unilife Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Unilife Medical Solutions Limited, or UMSL, an Australian corporation. UMSL is in the process of redomiciling in the State of Delaware. After completion of the redomiciliation transaction described herein, but before this registration statement becomes effective, Unilife Corporation will become the parent company of UMSL and its subsidiaries.

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, the information included in this registration statement, including the consolidated financial statements of Unilife Corporation, assumes the completion of the redomiciliation transaction. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this registration statement to “Unilife,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Unilife Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, including UMSL.

Trademarks, Trade Names and Service Marks

UNITRACT® is a registered trademark of the Company in the United States and Australia, with trademark registrations filed or in process in other jurisdictions. Unitract™ Safe Syringe is a registered trademark in Australia. We have commenced applications to register trademarks for our company name Unilife and our ready-to-fill syringe brand name, Unifill. UNITRACT®, UNILIFE™ and UNIFILL™ are all trademarks held by UMSL’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Unitract Syringe Pty, Ltd., an Australian corporation. Each trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in this registration statement is, to our knowledge, owned by such other company.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This registration statement contains forward-looking statements. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled “Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “potential” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Our management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, you should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements because such statements speak only as of the date when made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, events and developments to differ materially from our historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this registration statement and those described from time to time in our future reports which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should read this registration statement and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this registration statement completely.

Currencies

Unless indicated otherwise in this registration statement, all references to $ or dollars refer to US dollars. References to A$ mean the lawful currency of the Commonwealth of Australia. References to € or Euros are to the lawful currency of the European Union.


Item 1.		Business

Overview

We are a U.S. based medical device company focused on the design, development, manufacture and supply of a proprietary range of retractable syringes. Primary target customers for our products include pharmaceutical manufacturers, suppliers of medical equipment to healthcare facilities, and patients who self-administer prescription medication. All of our syringes incorporate automatic and fully-integrated safety features which are designed to protect those at risk of needlestick injuries and injury from other unsafe injection practices. Our main product is the Unifill ready-to-fill syringe, which is designed to be supplied to pharmaceutical manufacturers in a form that is ready for filling with their injectable drugs and vaccines. We have a strategic partnership with sanofi-aventis, a large global pharmaceutical company, pursuant to which it has paid us a €10 million exclusivity fee and has committed to pay us up to an additional €17 million to fund our industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. Upon the scheduled completion of the industrialization program in late 2010, we expect to commence the supply and sale of the Unifill syringe to sanofi-aventis. We are also in discussions with other pharmaceutical companies that are seeking to obtain access to the Unifill syringe. In addition, we have recently begun to manufacture our Unitract 1mL insulin syringes at our FDA-registered manufacturing facility in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania.

In the United States and a number of other sophisticated healthcare markets, hospitals and other healthcare facilities, as well as pharmaceutical manufacturers who supply injectable drugs and vaccines in a prefilled syringe format, are increasingly required to comply with legislation aimed at protecting healthcare workers from the risk of acquiring blood-borne diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C via needlestick injuries. Our core portfolio of safety syringe products, including the Unifill syringe and the Unitract 1mL syringes, are designed for supply to pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare facilities which are seeking to comply with these needlestick prevention laws. We expect our products will also be used by patients who self-administer prescription medication outside of the healthcare setting. The safety features incorporated into our products include an automatic needle retraction mechanism which allows operators to control the rate of needle withdrawal directly from the body into the barrel of the syringe, as well as an independent auto-disable mechanism to prevent product tampering or re-use. The integration of these safety features within the barrel is designed to make them intuitive to use and compact in size for convenient handling and disposal.

The Unifill syringe is targeted for use by pharmaceutical manufacturers who utilize pre-filled (ready-to-fill) syringes as a preferred drug delivery device for injectable drugs and vaccines. We are aware of more than 50 drug products used within healthcare facilities, or by patients who self-administer prescription medication, that are currently available in a prefilled syringe format. We have designed the Unifill syringe so that it is compatible with the drug validation and manufacturing systems currently used by target pharmaceutical customers to fill and package standard prefilled syringes. To our knowledge, our Unifill product is the only known prefilled syringe with automatic safety features which are integrated inside the glass barrel.

We have signed an exclusive licensing agreement and an industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis, who we believe to be the single largest global purchaser of pre-filled syringes. Under the exclusive licensing agreement, sanofi-aventis paid us a €10 million upfront one-time fee, and we granted sanofi-aventis a license to certain of our intellectual property in order and solely to develop, in collaboration with us, the Unifill syringe. Pursuant to the exclusive licensing agreement, we are negotiating a list of therapeutic drugs classes with respect to which sanofi-aventis would have the exclusive right to the product for a specified term, during which sanofi-aventis would purchase the product exclusively from us. We have retained the right to negotiate other business arrangements with additional pharmaceutical companies seeking to market the product for use within therapeutic drug classes outside of those exclusive to sanofi-aventis, or after the expiration of the exclusive license with sanofi-aventis.

Under the industrialization agreement, sanofi-aventis has agreed to provide us with up to €17 million in payments based upon milestones to be achieved under the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. We expect to complete this program in late 2010. We have received payments of €11.5 million under the industrialization agreement from October 2008 through December 2009. We describe our arrangements with sanofi-aventis in more detail under “Strategic Partnership with sanofi-aventis.” We are also aware of more than 20 other pharmaceutical companies that supply injectable drugs in a prefilled syringe format, and we have received interest in the Unifill syringe from a number of these companies.

Our Unitract 1mL syringes are designed primarily for use in healthcare facilities and by patients who self-administer prescription medication such as insulin. We have recently begun U.S. production of this syringe, which we expect to release commercially in early 2010. We have received regulatory clearance for the marketing and sale of the Unitract 1mL syringe in the United States, the European Union, Canada and Australia. We have also filed patents for other clinical and prefilled safety syringe products that may incorporate certain aspects of our core technology for future commercialization. Our in-house team has fully designed, developed, built and validated, to the requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and ISO 13485, the automated assembly system that we use to support production of our Unilife 1mL syringe at our FDA-registered manufacturing facility in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania. We consider our ability to design and develop highly sophisticated, innovative medical devices, and the automated assembly systems we use to manufacture them, to be a core business competency.

We also manufacture non-proprietary medical devices under contract for B. Braun Medical, Inc., a multinational healthcare equipment company. This contract manufacturing business was historically operated by Integrated BioSciences, Inc. which we acquired in January 2007. We are currently concentrating substantially all of our commercial and operational efforts towards the commercialization of our proprietary medical devices, namely the Unifill syringe and the Unitract 1mL syringe, and do not expect the contract manufacturing business to represent a significant portion of our business going forward.

Market Opportunity

The Syringe Market and the Increasing Use of Pre-Filled Syringes

According to the International Association of Safe Injection Technology, approximately 35 billion syringes are manufactured every year, half of which are used within sophisticated healthcare markets such as North America, Europe, Japan and Australia. The majority of therapeutic injections occur within healthcare facilities such as acute-care hospitals and long-term care centers. Other sectors of the global syringe market include patients who self-administer prescription medication such as insulin, government agencies which sponsor harm reduction programs, and non-government organizations which conduct vaccination programs.

Injectable drugs and vaccines have traditionally been supplied in a vial or ampoule, with the operator required to draw up a measured dose of medication into a conventional plastic syringe immediately prior to an injection. Prefilled syringes typically utilize a glass barrel and are filled by pharmaceutical manufacturers so that they are ready for use prior to shipment. While conventional syringes make up the vast majority of syringes used, prefilled syringes are becoming an increasingly popular method of drug delivery.

We are aware of more than 50 drugs and vaccines that are currently available in a prefilled syringe format from more than 20 pharmaceutical companies, and believe that a number of pipeline drugs are likely to be supplied in this format in the future. Greystone Associates, a medical and health care technology consulting firm, has estimated that approximately 2.23 billion prefilled syringes will be used globally in 2009, and that this number will increase significantly in the coming years. Drugs that are currently supplied in a prefilled syringe format include anti-coagulants to prevent and treat thrombosis, anti-inflammatories to treat rheumatoid arthritis, anti-infectives to treat hepatitis B and C, hematological drugs to stimulate production of red or white blood cells to treat anemia or fight infection, and vaccines which seek to prevent a range of diseases. We expect that prefilled syringes will also be increasingly used in the coming years as a drug delivery device for other therapeutic drug classes including obstetrics, oncology, osteoporosis and human growth hormone treatment.

Prefilled syringes have a number of advantages over conventional plastic syringes. First, prefilled syringes help pharmaceutical companies improve manufacturing efficiencies through the elimination of drug wastage commonly associated with the overfilling of multi-use vials. Second, healthcare workers often prefer prefilled syringes because they can facilitate a relatively fast, accurate and convenient administration of a drug. Furthermore, a pre-measured dose of an injectable drug in a prefilled syringe can help reduce the risk of dosing errors. Finally, the relative ease-of-use by patients of prefilled syringes also makes them suitable for the self-administration of many types of prescription medication.

Increased Focus on Prevention of Needlestick Injuries

The World Health Organization estimates that 1.3 million people die each year as a result of needlestick injuries, syringe re-use, and other unsafe injection practices. Needlestick injuries and syringe sharing can result in the transmission of a number of blood-borne diseases such as HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 385,000 needlestick and other sharps-related injuries are sustained by U.S. hospital-based healthcare personnel each year. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, estimates that when other secondary healthcare settings are also taken into account, there are as many as 800,000 needlestick injuries to U.S. healthcare workers each year. To help minimize the transmission of blood-borne pathogens caused by unsafe injection practices, many international healthcare and pharmaceutical markets are transitioning to the mandatory use of safety syringes.

In sophisticated healthcare markets, governments are focused on the mandatory use of safety devices within healthcare facilities to protect healthcare workers from the risk of acquiring blood-borne pathogens such as HIV-AIDS and hepatitis C via needlestick injuries. The United States was the first nation to mandate the use of safety syringes within healthcare facilities, with the adoption of the Federal Needlestick Prevention Act in 2000, or FNSPA, and the subsequent revision to the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (BPS). According to the International Healthcare Worker Safety Center at the University of Virginia Health System, approximately one in five healthcare facilities that were inspected by OSHA between 2002 and 2007 have been issued with citations for non-compliance with the BPS.

The European Union is also considering the introduction of legislation requiring member countries to use needlestick prevention products within healthcare facilities, while other countries such as Canada and Australia have also taken steps to encourage the use of safety syringes. As a result of this existing and proposed legislation, safety syringes are now commonly used within the healthcare facilities in a number of countries.

The United States represents the largest and most mature market for safety syringes, with a substantial majority of hypodermic syringes and needles used within acute-care facilities featuring some type of needlestick prevention device. Notwithstanding the increased use of safety syringes, we believe that current safety syringe technologies are in several respects inadequate to fully protect healthcare workers from infection risk caused by needlestick injuries or other potential transmission modes. First, most products currently available require operators to manually slide an external plastic guard or sheath over the needle after use, or retract the needle into the barrel at a rapid, uncontrolled rate. Second, healthcare workers may choose to remove or not activate the safety feature of some types of safety syringe products. Moreover, activation of the needle retraction mechanism in the open air for some retractable syringes, rather than inside the body of the patient, may create the potential risk of infection via needlestick injuries or aerosol (splatter).

OSHA differentiates safety features in two primary ways. First, it differentiates passive safety features which “remain in effect before, during and after use” from active devices which “require the worker to activate the safety mechanism.” Second, OSHA regulations state that products with an “integrated safety design that is an integral part of the device and cannot be removed” are usually preferred to those with an accessory safety device with safety features that are “external” and “dependent on employee compliance.” We believe the majority of safety syringe products used in U.S. healthcare facilities incorporate active safety features which are not fully integrated within the barrel of the syringe.

We are not aware of any prefilled syringe with passive safety features that are integrated within the glass barrel. To improve compliance with legislation such as the FNSPA, a number of pharmaceutical companies attach ancillary safety products onto standard prefilled syringes following dose filling and prior to packaging. We estimate that approximately half of the drugs currently available in prefilled syringe format are supplied by the pharmaceutical manufacturer with an ancillary safety device. The majority of these ancillary safety products slide an external plastic sheath or guard over the needle once the injection has been completed.

It is costly for pharmaceutical companies to purchase these ancillary safety products and the automated assembly systems required to attach them onto a standard prefilled syringe. The relatively large size of prefilled syringes supplied with an ancillary safety device can also significantly increase the shipment and packaging costs of pharmaceutical companies. Furthermore, some of these prefilled syringes supplied with an ancillary safety device require the removal of the safety device from the syringe prior to use, creating the risk of infection via needlestick injury or aerosol (splatter). Thus, we believe that there is a significant market opportunity for a prefilled syringe with passive and integrated safety features that is compatible with pharmaceutical companies’ drug filling systems.

We also believe there are significant market opportunities for the use of conventional and prefilled safety syringes outside of mainstream healthcare facilities. In addition to insulin, a range of other injectable drugs designed for the prevention and/or treatment of chronic or debilitating conditions such as arthritis, multiple sclerosis and osteoporosis and thrombosis are now available for self-administration. We believe the popularity of safety syringes among patients who self-administer prescription medication may increase due to their capacity to prevent needlestick injuries to family members and encourage safe, convenient disposal. When purchased with a prescription, a number of insurance providers in the U.S. now cover safety insulin syringes under the same tier level for reimbursement as standard insulin syringes.

We believe that another market which may in the future transition towards the mandatory use of non-reusable safety syringes is the harm reduction market, where governments provide free or subsidized syringes to injecting drug users, or IDUs. The reuse and sharing of syringes by IDUs has been identified as a prime accelerant in the transmission of blood-borne diseases and is responsible for one-third of new HIV infections outside sub-Saharan Africa. The governments of more than 60 countries worldwide now sponsor harm reduction programs which seek to minimize unsafe injection practices by IDUs. While these programs have proven largely effective in preventing or containing HIV epidemics, the continued sharing of standard syringes among IDUs has contributed to the continuation of national epidemics of the relatively more infectious hepatitis C. Furthermore, the unsafe disposal of syringes in public areas creates public concern regarding the risk of needlestick injury. Recognizing the scale of HIV and hepatitis C epidemics, and the substantial economic costs associated with their long-term treatment, many governments are considering the use of single use, safety syringes as a way to enforce safe injection practices among IDUs.

Our Solution

Our clinical and prefilled safety syringes incorporate automatic, also known as passive, safety features which are fully integrated within the barrel. They are designed to assist pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare facilities comply with needlestick prevention laws and to encourage single use and safe disposal practices outside of healthcare settings. We consider the following combination of core proprietary features available in our safety products to be unique within the marketplace:

•

Integrated design. All safety features are fully integrated inside the syringe barrel to facilitate compact handling, intuitive use and convenient disposal.

•

Passive retraction. The activation of the needle retraction mechanism occurs automatically while the needle is inside the body to help prevent the risk of needlestick injury.

•

Controlled retraction. Operators can control the speed of needle retraction directly from the body into the syringe barrel to help reduce the risk of infection through transmission routes such as needlestick injuries and aerosol (splatter).

•

Auto-disable. Upon withdrawal of the needle into the barrel, the plunger is automatically locked to prevent re-exposure or reuse.

We have utilized this core proprietary technology to design and develop a range of prefilled and clinical safety syringes. Furthermore, we are not aware of any other company that is manufacturing safety syringes with automatic, integrated safety features in both a prefilled (glass) and clinical (plastic) format which share the same common technology platform.

Key target markets for our products include pharmaceutical companies, healthcare facilities and patients who self-administer prescription medication. We believe that the majority of our products would be supplied, either directly or through pharmaceutical customers, for use within sophisticated healthcare markets such as North America, Western Europe and some Asia-Pacific countries that require or are transitioning toward the mandatory use of safety syringes.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to progressively move to the forefront of the international transition of healthcare and pharmaceutical markets to the mandatory use of prefilled and clinical safety syringes. We believe that the competitive strength of our proprietary technology puts us in a strong position to become an established and preferred supplier of “best-in-class” safety syringe products to pharmaceutical companies, healthcare facilities and patients who self-administer prescription medication.

Key elements of our business strategy are the development, production and sale of our patent-protected safety syringes, the continued expansion of our global operational and commercial presence and the establishment of long-term supply relationships with multinational pharmaceutical and healthcare equipment companies. We are committed to designing, developing and supplying innovative medical devices that can enhance and save lives. We plan to:

•

Continue to build a strong relationship with sanofi-aventis: We believe sanofi-aventis is currently the world’s largest consumer of prefilled syringes. We have had a business relationship with sanofi-aventis since 2003, and under our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis, they are funding our industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. Upon completion of the industrialization program, we expect to begin supplying the product to sanofi-aventis for use within defined therapeutic drug classes.

•

Enter into business relationships with additional pharmaceutical companies: We have retained the right to negotiate licensing and other business arrangements relating to the Unifill syringe with other pharmaceutical companies for use within those therapeutic drug classes outside of those held by sanofi-aventis during its period of exclusivity. It is our intention to secure agreements with other additional pharmaceutical companies who are industry leaders within their respective therapeutic areas of expertise. By pursuing this strategy, we believe our products can be marketed within a significant number of large therapeutic drug classes where prefilled syringes are commonly used.

•

Expand our proprietary product portfolio: We will seek to enhance our competitive position in the design, development and supply of innovative safety medical devices for use within international pharmaceutical and healthcare markets. In addition to the production and supply of the Unifill syringe and the Unitract 1mL syringes, we intend to commercialize a number of additional proprietary products which we believe can also meet the functionality and safety requirements of target customers. This may include the commercialization of our range of Unitract Clinical Syringes in a 3mL and 5mL size targeted for use within acute care hospitals and other healthcare facilities. We may also commercialize additional ready-to-fill syringe products currently in our development pipeline which, like the Unifill syringe, would be designed for supply to pharmaceutical manufacturers. While our focus will remain on the pursuit of organic growth opportunities, we may evaluate opportunities to acquire other complementary technologies or products on a case-by-case basis.

•

Expand our operational capabilities within Central Pennsylvania: The United States represents the world’s largest and most mature market for the supply and use of our products and services. We will continue to consolidate the majority of our commercial and operational activities within Central Pennsylvania, a national logistics hub situated between several major pharmaceutical and medical device industry clusters. We intend to make a significant investment in the expansion of our operational capabilities within Pennsylvania to support the commercialization of our core products, such as the Unifill syringe.

•

Manufacture and supply our Unitract 1mL Syringes to target international markets: We commenced production of the Unitract range of 1mL safety syringes at our facility in Pennsylvania in August 2009. We expect to release this product commercially in early 2010. Product variants within this range have been certified for marketing and sale within key international territories including the United States, Canada, Europe and Australia. We intend to continue to expand our customer base of pharmaceutical companies and healthcare distributors for the marketing and sale of the Unitract 1mL syringes.

Our Products

Unifill syringe

Our Unifill ready-to-fill syringe is, to our knowledge, the only prefilled syringe with passive (automatic) and fully integrated safety features. Manufacturing features include a staked needle with a glass barrel that requires shaping at only one end to allow sourcing from a multitude of glass cartridge suppliers, and the development of components in the fluid path that use the same materials as standard prefilled syringes to facilitate drug compatibility. The product is designed to be a safe, compact and intuitive primary drug container suitable for use within healthcare facilities and by patients who self-administer prescription medication.

The Unifill syringe is designed to fit the manufacturing systems currently used by pharmaceutical customers to load and package a measured dose of an injectable drug into a standard prefilled syringe. We believe the use of the Unifill syringe by a pharmaceutical customer can eliminate its need to purchase and attach ancillary safety products onto standard prefilled syringes to comply with needlestick prevention legislation. In addition to reducing production costs associated with the purchase and attachment of these ancillary devices, we believe our product can also significantly reduce comparable shipping and storage costs. The compact size, intuitive use, functionality and automatic safety features of the Unifill syringe may also help pharmaceutical companies extend product lifecycles, increase levels of market differentiation in competitive therapeutic areas, and expand the marketability of some drugs for convenient self-administration by patients outside of the healthcare setting.

We commenced initial pilot production of the Unifill syringe at our Lewisberry, Pennsylvania facility in 2008. We intend to file a Type III Drug Master File for the product with relevant regulatory authorities such as the FDA, although it is the ultimate responsibility of the pharmaceutical customer to obtain final approval of the combination drug-delivery device. We expect that the commencement of product sales will coincide with the completion of the industrialization program with sanofi-aventis.

Unitract 1mL syringes

The Unitract 1mL range of safety syringes is primarily designed for the subcutaneous injection of drugs within healthcare facilities and by patients who self-administer prescription medication such as insulin. In addition to insulin and tuberculin variants, the Unitract 1mL range also includes the Unitract safe syringe which is custom-designed for use by governments that utilize harm reduction (needle exchange) programs to prevent the reuse, sharing and unsafe disposal practices of IDUs. Unlike the Unifill ready-to-fill syringe, the Unitract 1mL syringes require healthcare workers or patients to draw up the dose from a vial or ampoule immediately prior to the injection.

We have received regulatory certification for the marketing and sale of various Unitract 1mL syringe products in the United States, Australia and Canada and have received CE Mark approval in the European Union. We commenced initial production of Unitract 1mL syringes in China during 2008 to support regulatory approval and marketing activities. In August 2009, we commenced production of the Unitract 1mL syringes at our Pennsylvania facility utilizing an automated assembly system that we designed and built in-house. We expect to commence commercial sales of U.S.-manufactured stock after the completion of required stability (aging) testing towards the end of 2009.

Pipeline Products

We also hold additional syringe-related intellectual property for products which we intend to commercialize in the future. These pipeline products include a range of plastic clinical syringes to be developed in a range of larger sizes such as 3mL and 5mL. We believe that commercialization of this pipeline range of larger clinical syringes would further improve our opportunities to market and sell our products within healthcare facilities such as acute-care hospitals. We have also designed and filed patents for a number of other safety syringe products that utilize our proprietary technology. We intend to continue to expand our competitive position within target pharmaceutical and healthcare markets through the commercialization of a number of these other pipeline products.

Strategic Partnership with sanofi-aventis

We started to collaborate with sanofi-aventis in 2003 for the development of the Unifill syringe as a next-generation drug delivery safety device. Sanofi-aventis is a large, global pharmaceutical company, whose products span multiple therapeutic areas, including cardiovascular diseases, thrombosis, oncology, metabolic diseases, internal medicine and vaccines. We believe that sanofi-aventis is currently the world’s largest purchaser of prefilled syringes.

We have signed an exclusive licensing agreement with sanofi-aventis. Under the exclusive licensing agreement, we have granted sanofi-aventis an exclusive license to certain of our intellectual property in order and solely to develop, in collaboration with us, the Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the prefilled syringe market within those therapeutic areas to be agreed upon between us, and a non-exclusive license outside those therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis or after the expiration of the exclusive license with sanofi-aventis. Pursuant to the exclusive licensing agreement, sanofi-aventis has paid to us a €10 million upfront one-time fee. The exclusive license granted thereunder has an initial term expiring on June 30, 2014, unless we and sanofi-aventis fail to agree upon the list of therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis, in which event the exclusive license will have a term until June 29, 2012 for all therapeutic areas. If, during the term of the exclusive license, sanofi-aventis has purchased the Unifill syringe for use with a particular drug product, sanofi-aventis will receive a ten-year extension of the term of the exclusive license, which extension will be reduced to five years if sanofi-aventis does not sell a minimum of 20 million units of the product in any of the first five years of such ten-year extension period.

Under the exclusive licensing agreement, we are not precluded from using certain of our intellectual property to develop, license and sell any products in any market other than the ready-to-fill syringe market, or from entering into licensing or other business arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies for the ready-to-fill syringe market outside those therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis, or after the expiration of the exclusive license with sanofi-aventis. If we grant a license to a third party in respect of the ready-to-fill syringe market, then we are required to pay sanofi-aventis 70% of any access, license or other upfront fee received from such third party for access to purchase the products until our payments to sanofi-aventis have totaled €10 million, following which we are required to pay 30% of such fees we receive through the end of the initial exclusivity period. We are also required to pay sanofi-aventis an annual royalty payment of 5% of the revenue generated from any sale of the Unifill syringe to third parties, up to a maximum amount of €17 million in such royalty payments.

On June 30, 2009, we signed an industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis. The industrialization agreement sets forth the terms for the collaboration between the parties to design, develop, scale up and industrialize the Unifill syringe, including the timetable and milestones for the industrialization program. Under the industrialization agreement, sanofi-aventis has agreed to provide up to €17 million in payments to us based on milestones we achieve in our industrialization program. The industrialization program began in July 2008 and is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2010. From October 2008 through December 2009, we have received payments of €11.5 million under the industrialization agreement. Key hurdles which remain until we complete the industrialization program include the development of a pilot automated assembly system, the completion of a new manufacturing facility and the establishment of a designated cleanroom for the installation of the automated assembly system. The industrialization agreement required sanofi-aventis to provide a list to us that specifies therapeutic drug classes for which it seeks to market the Unifill syringe on an exclusive basis. We and sanofi-aventis are discussing the exclusivity list sanofi-aventis provided us and if the list is agreed, sanofi-aventis will retain exclusive rights to the use of the product within these designated therapeutic drug classes until June 30, 2014, subject to the extension described above. If we are unable to reach an agreement on the list, then sanofi-aventis will retain full exclusivity across all therapeutic classes only until June 29, 2012. Unless terminated earlier, the industrialization agreement has a term until the completion of the industrialization program.

The industrialization agreement provides that, subject to the full completion of the industrialization program, the parties will negotiate a supply agreement for the manufacture and purchase of the final product on a commercial scale. The supply agreement will provide that sanofi-aventis and its affiliates will purchase the final product exclusively from us, and the industrialization agreement provides that we are not required to commit more than 30% of our expected installed production capacity to sanofi-aventis and its affiliates for the 12 months following the receipt of a purchase order. Any order of sanofi-aventis, together with its other orders, that will exceed the 30% capacity limit will require up to a maximum of 24 months lead time before we are required to commence delivery of that order.

Pursuant to the industrialization agreement, if UMSL agrees to, or proposes to agree to, a change of control with a third party, UMSL must give a written notice to sanofi-aventis, who will be entitled, within five business days, to make an offer on at least equivalent terms. In the absence of an improved change of control proposal, UMSL must accept the matching offer of sanofi-aventis. If UMSL receives an improved change of control offer from the third party, then UMSL must give a further notice to sanofi-aventis for it to make a further matching offer. In addition, if during the term of the industrialization agreement, a change of control that does not involve sanofi-aventis, or its affiliates, obtaining control of UMSL (i) is not recommended by UMSL’s board of directors, (ii) will cause harm to sanofi-aventis, as defined in the agreement or (iii) under which Mr. Alan Shortall, our CEO and director, is not to continue in such capacities for at least two years after the change of control, then sanofi-aventis will have the right to terminate the industrialization agreement within ten business days after receiving a notice from UMSL, or after it otherwise becomes aware of the change of control. Pursuant to the industrialization agreement, a change of control means, in general terms, a change in the ownership of 50% or more of UMSL’s shares or the power to determine the majority composition of UMSL’s board of directors or any other event that UMSL’s board determines to be a change of control event.

Manufacturing

We have an FDA-registered, 50,000 square foot medical device production facility in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania. This facility has two class-eight clean rooms. The first clean room houses a fully automated assembly system used to manufacture our Unitract 1mL syringes. This automated assembly system, which has an optimum capacity of up to 40 million units per year, was fully designed, developed, built and qualified by our in-house team. The other clean room is used to assemble non-proprietary medical devices under contract with B. Braun. Other areas of our Lewisberry facility are used for offices, product design and prototyping, engineering activities and the construction of automated assembly systems. Prior to the commencement of commercial production of the Unitract 1mL syringe at our Lewisberry facility, we utilized a medical device company in China to manufacture sufficient volumes of these products to obtain regulatory approvals and undertake preliminary marketing activities. We intend to focus upon the domestic manufacture of our Unitract 1mL syringe at our Lewisberry facility in the forseeable future.

To support our manufacturing plan for the high-volume production of the Unifill syringe, we are outsourcing the development and manufacture of automated assembly systems for this product to Mikron Assembly Technology, an established industry specialist. On November 12, 2009, we signed a purchase agreement with Mikron for the development and supply of a pilot automated assembly system to support the commercial production of our Unilfill syringe. The development of the automated assembly system began in December 2009, with completion and installation into our new facility scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2010. We anticipate that this automated assembly system will have a target production capacity of approximately 60 million units per year. Additional assembly lines, which we expect to commission and operate beyond 2010, are targeted to have a significantly higher annual manufacturing capacity. To support our business expansion activities, we are in the process of developing a new manufacturing facility close to our Lewisberry facility within York County, Pennsylvania. We expect to transition at least some of our manufacturing activities into the new manufacturing facility during 2010. For more details regarding the development of the new manufacturing facility, please see “Item 3. Properties”.

We source our components and raw materials under written contracts with a variety of suppliers, all of which specialize in the medical device and pharmaceutical sectors. We have also entered into a number of relationships with other companies for the initial supply of components, raw materials and related services for the Unifill syringe. Due to an initial requirement for only limited production volumes of components which comprise the Unifill syringe, we currently receive a majority, or in some cases all, our components such as rubber seals and glass barrels from a single source supplier. To support the industrialization program for this product and further strengthen our supply chain in the long-term, we intend to establish, wherever feasible, a dual-source strategy for the production of key components, raw materials and related services. The companies we expect to appoint for the production and supply of items and related services pertaining to the Unifill syringe all have an established presence in the international drug delivery market, with the majority having facilities in both North America and Europe.

Sales and Marketing

We expect that our primary customers will be pharmaceutical companies which utilize prefilled syringes as a primary container device for the administration of therapeutic drugs and vaccines. We intend to enter into supply agreements for the Unifill syringe with sanofi-aventis and some other pharmaceutical customers. The majority of these target pharmaceutical customers are multinational companies with headquarters located in either the United States or Europe.

We expect the pharmaceutical customer to be primarily responsible for the sale, marketing and clinical use of the combination drug-delivery device to target government agencies, healthcare facilities or patients who self-administer prescription medication within indicated therapeutic drug classes. We expect to support pharmaceutical customers in the development of documentation or marketing material pertaining to the recommended clinical use of the device with the contained drug or vaccine. We may also enter into agreements for the supply of the Unitract 1mL syringes directly to pharmaceutical companies for use with injectable drug products which are supplied in a vial and marketed in a kit format.

We also intend to distribute our Unitract 1mL syringes within the United States via distributors which specialize in target markets such as long-term and acute care healthcare facilities or the direct mail order of prescription medication and medical equipment to patients for self-administration. We will also examine opportunities to enter into relationships for our Unitract 1mL syringes with group purchasing organizations, or GPOs, which secure competitive pricing for commodity items such as syringes on behalf of members such as acute-care hospitals. Over the past decade, many GPOs have introduced programs that encourage the expedient evaluation and selection of innovative products developed by smaller companies. However, we do not expect to fully penetrate the acute-care hospital market until we have a complete range of clinical syringe sizes.

Outside of the United States, we have a distributor to sell our Unitract 1mL syringes in Canada and expect to appoint other distributors within other international healthcare markets such as Western Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Furthermore, we intend to review opportunities to collaborate with governments seeking to examine the use of our Unitract 1mL syringes as a means of helping to prevent the re-use, sharing and unsafe disposal of non-sterile syringes by injecting drug users.

We have a small internal team to support the training of appointed distributors in the marketing and clinical use of our Unitract 1mL syringes. We intend to expand this team as we commence sales of our Unitract 1mL syringes, appoint additional distributors and commercialize our larger-sized clinical syringes.

Intellectual Property

We have established an intellectual property portfolio through which we seek to protect our products and technology. Our intellectual property portfolio includes 24 issued patents in 13 countries, with two issued patents each in Australia and the United States. We have filed a significant number of patent applications that are now pending in Australia, the United States, Europe, China, India and other countries covered under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. We also hold provisional patent applications in both the United States and Australia and several registered trademarks. Our patents expire at various dates between 2018 and 2028. Trade secrets law in the United States and other jurisdictions provides additional protection. We also enter into non-disclosure agreements with certain vendors and customers. All active United States based employees have signed confidentiality, non-compete and intellectual property assignment agreements.

We classify our patents and patent applications as they relate to particular product categories including 1mL insulin and safe syringes with an attached needle; clinical syringes which include larger sizes and interchangeable luer needles; and our Unifill syringe. Many of the features claimed in the insulin and safe syringes patents, such as the mechanism allowing automatic and controlled needle retraction within an integrated medical device, also apply to our other safety syringe products, including the Unifill syringe. Some key patents covering countries such as Australia, the United States and Europe, as well as some of our international patent applications, are described below:

INSULIN AND SAFE SYRINGE (UNITRACT)

Description

Issued Patent No.

Patent Application No.

Publication No.

Patent Expiry Date

Australian Patent

731159

September 22, 2018

US Patent

6,083,199

September 22, 2018

International Patent Application

PCT/AU01/000458

WO 01/80930

April 20, 2021

Europe

01925194.1

1 276 530 A

April 20, 2021

USA

7,500,967

20030158525

July 15, 2022

International Patent Application

PCT/AU2004/000354

WO 2004/082747

Europe

04721775.7

1 608 421A

March 19, 2024

USA

10/549,710

20060235354

March 19, 2024*

CLINICAL SYRINGE

Description

Issued Patent No.

Patent Application No.

Publication No.

Patent Expiry Date

International Patent Application

PCT/AU2005/000107

WO 2005/072801

Europe

05700138.0

1 708 772

January 28, 2025

USA

10/587,705

20080255513

January 28, 2025*

International Patent Application

PCT/AU2006/000618

WO 2006/119570

Europe

06721494.0

1 879 635A

May 11, 2026

USA

11/914,092

20090221962

May 11, 2026*

READY TO FILL SYRINGE (UNIFILL)

Description

Issued Patent No.

Patent Application No.

Publication No.

Patent Expiry Date

International Patent Application

PCT/AU2006/000516

WO 2006/108243

Europe

06721397.5

1 868 669

April 18, 2026

USA

11/911,481

2009093759

April 18, 2026*

International Patent Application

PCT/AU2008/000971

WO 2009/003234 A1

Europe

08757038.8

July 2, 2028


*		subject to possible patent term adjustment

An issued patent, unlike a pending patent application, has been reviewed by the relevant national patent office and has met the legal requirements for patentability required by the law of that country. An issued patent can therefore be enforced against infringers in the courts of the country where granted, although an issued patent does not guarantee that the company has freedom to operate and could still infringe upon the issued patent of another patent held by a third party.

In a number of key countries, we have registered trademarks including Unitract™ and have commenced applications to register trademarks for our company name, Unilife, as well as our ready-to-fill syringe brand name Unifill. Unitract™ is a registered trademark in the United States and is also filed under the Madrid Protocol Agreement for the international registration of marks in 25 countries, including France, Germany, Japan, China, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Additionally, Unitract™ is a registered trademark in Australia, Mexico, New Zealand, Canada, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Brazil. Unitract™ Safe Syringe is also a registered trademark in Australia.

Government Regulation

The development, manufacture, sale and distribution of medical devices are subject to comprehensive government regulation. Our medical devices and manufacturing operations are subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the FDC Act, as implemented and enforced by the FDA and various other federal and state agencies and are also subject to regulation by foreign governmental agencies. These laws and regulations govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution and market surveillance of medical devices.

FDA’s Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements

Unless an exemption applies, each medical device we wish to distribute commercially in the United States will require either prior 510(k) clearance or premarket approval from the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices intended for human use into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III. Class I or Class II devices require the manufacturer to submit to the FDA a premarket notification requesting permission to commercially distribute the device. This process is generally known as 510(k) clearance. Class III devices require premarket approval. Our clinical range of syringes, including our Unitract 1mL syringe, are Class II devices. Our Unifill syringe does not require 510(k) clearance because it will be sold to drug manufacturers for use as drug packaging. None of our products require premarket approval.

There is a different regulatory process that will apply to our Unifill syringe because it will be used by drug manufacturers to provide drugs in a prefilled format. In the case of the Unifill syringe, it is the responsibility of the pharmaceutical customer who will use the Unifill syringe for its drug to obtain final product approvals, either by submitting a new drug application or abbreviated new drug application. In order to support the pharmaceutical customer’s application, we intend to create what is known as a drug master file. A drug master file is a submission to the FDA that may be used to provide information about facilities, processes or articles used in the manufacturing, packaging and storing of one or more human drugs. The drug master file will define the manufacturing and safety characteristics of the Unifill syringe while protecting proprietary information regarding its technical design.

510(k) Clearance Pathway

When obtaining a 510(k) clearance is required, we must submit a premarket notification demonstrating that our proposed device is substantially equivalent to another legally marketed product (i.e., that it has the same intended use and that it is as safe and effective as a legally marketed, or predicate, device and does not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness than does a predicate device). According to FDA regulations, the FDA is required to clear or deny a 510(k) premarket notification within 90 days of submission of the application, or 30 days in the case of an abbreviated 510(k) application that may be filed for product line extensions. As a practical matter, 510(k) clearance often takes between three and twelve months.

We received 510(k) clearance for our Unitract 1mL insulin syringe in October 2008 that covered the production of the device by a contractor outside the United States. Since we will be producing this product in the United States, we will be required to submit a new 510(k) application that covers production of the device at our Pennsylvania manufacturing facility.

Premarket Approval Pathway

A premarket approval application must be submitted to the FDA if the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process. A premarket approval application must be supported by extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling to demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device. This process does not apply to our current range of products.

Pervasive and Continuing Regulation

After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:

•

quality system regulations, or QSR, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the manufacturing process;

•

labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or “off label” uses;

•

medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to occur; and

•

post-market surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device.

The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory enforcement powers. We are subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with the QSR and other regulations, and these inspections may include the manufacturing facilities of our manufacturing subcontractors.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement action by the FDA, which may include any of the following sanctions:

•

fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

•

recall or seizure of our products;

•

operating restrictions, partial suspensions or total shutdown of production;

•

refusing our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products or new intended uses;

•

withdrawing 510(k) clearance or premarket approvals that are already granted; and

•

criminal prosecution.

Regulation in the European Union and Australia

The European Union has adopted numerous directives regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Devices that comply with the requirements of the relevant directive will be entitled to bear CE conformity marking, indicating that the device conforms with the essential requirements of the applicable directives and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout the member states of the European Union. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the type and class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third party assessment by a “Notified Body” which is an independent and neutral institution appointed by a country to conduct the conformity assessment. This third-party assessment may consist of an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system and specific testing of the manufacturer’s device. An assessment by a Notified Body in one member state of the European Union is required in order for a manufacturer to commercially distribute the product throughout these countries. ISO 9001 and ISO 13845 are voluntary harmonized standards. Compliance establishes the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements for CE Marking. In July 2009, we received our ISO 13485:2003 quality system certification. Our certification includes the design, development, production and distribution or sterile syringes and insulin syringes and the provision of contract manufacturing services to the medical device industry.

We have successfully completed a Notified Body audit to allow our Unitract syringes to bear the CE mark and are currently awaiting certification from the Notified Body.

In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, or TGA, is responsible for administering the Australian Therapeutics Goods Act. The Office of Devices, Blood and Tissues is the department within the TGA responsible for medical devices. The Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods, or ARTG, controls the legal supply of therapeutic goods in Australia. The ARTG is the register of information about therapeutic goods for human use that may be imported, supplied in, or exported from Australia. Any use of an unapproved medical device in humans, even in pilot trials, requires an exemption from the requirement for inclusion on the ARTG. Our Unitract syringe products are currently included on the ARTG.

Other Regulations

We are also subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations, both in the United States and other international territories where we conduct business, relating to such matters as safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices and the use, handling and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances used in connection with our research and development work. Although we believe we are in compliance with these laws and regulations in all material respects, we cannot provide assurance that we will not be required to incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws or regulations in the future.

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws in the United States targeting fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry, which generally prohibit us from soliciting, offering, receiving or paying any remuneration in order to induce the ordering or purchasing of items or services that are in any way paid for by Medicare, Medicaid or other government-sponsored healthcare programs. Healthcare costs have been and continue to be a subject of study, investigation and regulation by governmental agencies and legislative bodies around the world. The U.S. federal government continues to scrutinize potentially fraudulent practices affecting Medicare, Medicaid and other government healthcare programs. Payers have become more influential in the marketplace and increasingly are focused on drug and medical device pricing, appropriate drug and medical device utilization and the quality and costs of healthcare. Violations of fraud and abuse-related laws are punishable by criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial fines, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and health programs outside the United States.

Competition

The healthcare equipment, pharmaceutical and medical device industry sectors in which we operate are highly competitive. We compete with many companies, both public and private, that range in size from small, highly focused businesses to large diversified multinational manufacturers of healthcare and pharmaceutical equipment, as more fully described below.

While we do not believe there are any other companies that offer a ready-to-fill syringe with safety features which are fully integrated within the glass barrel, there is a highly concentrated market for the production of standard ready-to-fill syringes for supply to pharmaceutical manufacturers. We are aware of five companies which specialize in the production and supply of glass ready-to-fill syringes. These companies are Becton, Dickinson and Company, or BD, Gerresheimer Bünde GmbH, MGlas AG, SCHOTT forma vitrum AG, and Nuova Ompi. All of these companies are larger and better capitalized than we are, and have an extensive base of pharmaceutical customers. We estimate the market concentration rate for these five companies to be around 95%. We believe BD’s market share to be in excess of 50%, as it has supply relationships with most pharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturing organizations. Of these five aforementioned companies, we believe that BD is the only one which also markets and supplies ancillary safety products for attachment onto standard prefilled syringes to assist pharmaceutical companies in their compliance with needlestick prevention laws. We are aware of another specialist supplier of ancillary safety products, Safety Syringes Inc, which has contracts with a number of pharmaceutical manufacturers.

We have sought to strengthen our competitive position in this marketplace in a number of ways. For example, the design of the Unifill syringe incorporates the use of a glass barrel which requires shaping at only one end. As a result, the glass barrel for the Unifill syringe can be sourced from the many global suppliers of glass cartridges and not just the five specialty manufacturers mentioned above.

The global market for clinical (non-pre-filled) plastic syringes is highly competitive, with at least 50 manufacturers located across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific. The market for clinical safety syringes is relatively less competitive, yet highly concentrated. We believe BD is the largest global supplier of clinical safety syringes. Other companies which compete in this market sector include Retractable Technologies, Inc, Covidien and Smiths Medical. All of these companies offer a full range of clinical safety syringes, operate a strong sales, distribution and customer support network, and have existing supply relationships with major healthcare buying groups.

Research and Development

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we incurred approximately $1.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively, on research and development of our technologies. Research and development costs include activities related to the research, development, design, testing, and manufacturing of prototypes of our products. It also includes clinical activities and regulatory costs. Research and development costs also include costs associated with certain consultants engaged in research and development activities along with a portion of the overhead costs we incur to operate our manufacturing facility. We expect our research and development expenses to continue as we continue to develop other pipeline product variants of our technology such as the Unitract clinical range of larger syringe sizes.

Employees

As of December 22, 2009, we had 97 employees, of whom approximately 77 are engaged in operations activities including research and development, quality assurance and manufacturing activities, five are engaged in marketing and clinical activities and 15 are engaged in finance, legal and other administrative functions. All but four of our employees and all of our executive officers are located at our facilities in Central Pennsylvania. All but two of our employees are full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Corporate History

Unilife Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on July 2, 2009, and is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of UMSL. As we describe in more detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Redomiciliation,” Unilife Corporation will become the parent company of UMSL upon completion of the redomiciliation and UMSL’s shareholders and optionholders will exchange their interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife Corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 633 Lowther Road, Lewisberry, PA 17339. Our telephone number at this address is +1 717 938-9323.

UMSL was incorporated on June 28, 1985, in South Australia, Australia. The registered office of UMSL is located at Suite 3, Level 11, 1 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000. Originally known as Musgrave Block Holdings Limited, UMSL acquired all of the issued shares of Unitract Pty Limited in November 2002, and changed its name to Unitract Limited (now Unilife Medical Solutions Limited), listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, or ASX under the ticker “UNI” and continued the business operations of Unitract Pty Limited and the development of Unitract Pty Limited’s retractable syringe project. In January 2007, in order to obtain a manufacturing presence in the United States, UMSL acquired all the stock of Integrated BioSciences, Inc., a Pennsylvania-based company, which changed its corporate name to Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. in February 2009. At the time of its acquisition by UMSL, Integrated BioSciences, Inc. was in the business of contract manufacturing of syringes for third parties and developing automated assembly equipment.


Item 1A.		Risk Factors

Our business faces many risks. We believe the risks described below are the material risks facing the Company. However, the risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional unknown risks or risks that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described below actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer, and the trading price of our shares of common stock could decline significantly. Investors should consider the specific risk factors discussed below, together with the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information” and the other information contained in this Form 10 and the other documents that we will file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Risks Relating to Our Business

Our success depends in large part on our ability to finalize the design of and complete the industrialization program for our primary product, the Unifill syringe. If we experience problems or delays in completing these activities, our business, including our ability to generate significant revenues, will be materially and adversely affected.

We commenced the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe in July 2008 and expect to finalize the design of and complete the industrialization program for the product, as well as the development of production systems to support its manufacture and commercial sale, by the end of calendar year 2010. Since the Unifill syringe is our primary product, any failure or significant delay in completing these activities could materially harm our business and our ability to generate any significant amount of revenues for the foreseeable future. We do not expect that our existing contract manufacturing business will generate significant revenues in the future. In addition, our contract with B. Braun expired on December 31, 2009 and while we and B. Braun continue to operate under the contract, there is no assurance that we will be able to renew this contract on favorable terms, if at all.

Our business is substantially dependent on our relationship with our strategic partner, sanofi-aventis, which is funding the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe, and our revenues from other sources are not significant.

To date, we have derived a substantial majority of our revenues from our exclusive licensing and industrialization agreements with sanofi-aventis. For the year ended June 30, 2009, our revenues from these agreements were $16.1 million, which represented 81% of our revenues for the period. We expect that revenues from sanofi-aventis will continue to account for a substantial majority of our revenues at least through the end of calendar 2010, which is when we expect to complete our industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. In addition, we will need to negotiate successfully with sanofi-aventis to finalize a supply agreement for the Unifill syringe. Even if we finalize this agreement and commence commercial sales to sanofi-aventis, we expect that sanofi-aventis will be our most significant customer, at least until its exclusive period terminates, and that revenues from sanofi-aventis will continue to account for a substantial majority of our revenues and cash flows from operations. Any termination or material breach of the existing agreements between sanofi-aventis and us, any failure to successfully negotiate a supply agreement, or any failure to perform under any supply agreement that we do negotiate, would be likely to materially and adversely affect our business.

Our research and development and other operating expenses are significant and we do not expect to be profitable unless and until we complete our industrialization program, negotiate a supply agreement with sanofi-aventis or other pharmaceutical companies and begin commercial sale of the Unifill syringe.

We have incurred and will continue to incur significant research and development expenses for the completion of the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe, as well as for the development of other product variants of our technology such as the Unitract Clinical Range of larger syringe sizes. We will also incur general and administrative expenses related to increasing our manufacturing operations, expanding our sales and marketing capabilities, seeking regulatory approvals, and complying with the requirements related to being a public company in both the United States and Australia. We will not be profitable unless we are successful in developing and commercializing the Unifill syringe and other new products, obtaining regulatory approvals, and manufacturing, marketing and selling commercial products.

The Unifill syringe has been designed to be compatible with the drug manufacturing systems currently utilized by sanofi-aventis, which may hinder our ability to sell the product to other pharmaceutical customers whose manufacturing processes may not be compatible with our current product designs.

The Unifill syringe has been designed to be compatible with the drug filling and packaging systems of sanofi-aventis. While the standard glass barrels to be used for the Unilfill syringe are also currently utilized by most pharmaceutical companies, the specific processes used by other pharmaceutical companies to fill, manufacture or package prefilled syringes with an injectable drug product may vary from those of sanofi-aventis. Furthermore, pharmaceutical companies may in some cases require the use of materials which are biocompatible with a particular drug compound and to which we do not have access. Such events may require design, material or process changes to our product, or restrict our ability to enter into supply relationships with other pharmaceutical companies and accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our ability to successfully market and sell our safety syringes outside of the pharmaceutical market may be impaired until we are able to offer a full range of safety syringes in sizes commonly used in acute-care facilities.

In addition to the Unifill syringe, our product portfolio also includes the Unitract 1mL syringe, a plastic syringe which we refer to as a clinical syringe. Acute-care hospitals are the largest single healthcare market for clinical syringes. These facilities use a range of clinical syringes, including 1mL, 3mL and 5mL sizes, for the subcutaneous and intramuscular administration of therapeutic drugs and vaccines. We have completed development and secured regulatory approvals only for the marketing and sale of our Unitract 1mL syringe. While we intend to market the Unitract 1mL syringe to other healthcare sectors in addition to acute-care facilities, our ability to market and sell our safety syringes successfully may be impaired until we are able to offer clinical syringes in a full range of sizes.

Our success will depend on the full commercialization of our current products, and the development and commercialization of other pipeline products. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in these efforts.

A significant element of our strategy focuses on developing products that deliver greater benefits to pharmaceutical companies, healthcare workers and patients. The development of these products requires significant research and development, clinical evaluations and regulatory approvals. The results of our product development efforts may be affected by a number of factors, including our ability to innovate, develop and manufacture new products, complete clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals and secure customer orders for these products. In addition, patents attained by others can preclude or delay our commercialization of a product. There can be no assurance that any products now in development, or that we may seek to develop in the future, will achieve technological feasibility, obtain regulatory approval or gain market acceptance.

We need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our efforts in developing our new manufacturing facility and in our product development or commercialization programs.

We are in the process of developing a new manufacturing facility in central Pennsylvania. We estimate the total cost to be approximately $26 million. We intend to internally fund $9 million of the cost and seek external financing for up to $17 million. Although we currently believe that our current cash resources, together with our anticipated cash flows, will be sufficient to fund our operations (other than the development of the new manufacturing facility which we expect to finance in part with the proceeds of external financing) through at least the end of fiscal 2010, we may also need to obtain additional funding in the future for our product development programs and commercialization efforts. In particular, if the amount of funding that sanofi-aventis has agreed to provide to us under the industrialization agreement is insufficient to complete the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe, we may need to obtain additional funding unless sanofi-aventis were to agree to provide us with additional funding, which it has no obligation to provide. We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise capital when needed on terms favorable to us, or at all. If we raise additional funds from debt financing, we may be obligated to abide by restrictive covenants contained in the debt financing agreements, which may make it more difficult for us to operate our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our shares of common stock may suffer dilution. If we are unable to secure additional funding when needed, our ability to develop the new manufacturing facility and continue in our product development and commercialization programs would be delayed, reduced or eliminated.

We may encounter difficulties managing our growth, which could materially harm our business.

We expect to expand our operations and grow our research and development, product development, regulatory, manufacturing, sales, marketing and administrative operations. This expansion has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. To manage our growth and to develop and commercialize our products, we will be required to improve existing, and implement new, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and expand, train and manage our growing employee base. In addition, we will need to manage relationships with various manufacturers, suppliers, customers and other organizations. Our ability to manage our operations and growth will require us to improve our operational, financial and management controls, as well as our internal reporting systems and controls. We may not be able to implement such improvements to our management information and internal control systems in an efficient and timely manner and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls. Our failure to accomplish any of these tasks could materially harm our business.

We depend on our executive officers and key personnel and the loss of them could adversely affect our business.

Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel, particularly Mr. Alan Shortall, our Chief Executive Officer, to provide strategic direction, manage our operations and maintain a cohesive and stable environment. Although we have employment agreements with Mr. Shortall and other key personnel, as well as incentive compensation plans that provide various economic incentives for them to remain with us, these agreements and incentives may not be sufficient to retain them. Our ability to operate successfully and manage our potential future growth also depends significantly upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and qualified research, technical, clinical, regulatory, sales, marketing, managerial and financial personnel. We face intense competition for such personnel, and we may not be able to attract, retain and motivate these individuals. The loss of our executive officers or other key personnel for any reason or our inability to hire, retain and motivate additional qualified personnel in the future could prevent us from sustaining or growing our business. In addition, we have a limited history of operations under our current officers and directors. Our officers have not worked together for an extensive length of time. If for any reason our management members cannot work efficiently as a team, our business will be adversely affected.

We will incur increased costs as a result of being a US reporting company and we have no experience as a US reporting company.

Upon the effectiveness of this registration statement, we will become subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Although UMSL has been listed on the ASX for several years and has been required to file financial information and make certain other filings with the ASX, our status as a U.S. reporting company under the Exchange Act will cause us to incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we have not previously incurred, including costs related to compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

If our internal control over financial reporting is found not to be effective by management or by an independent registered public accounting firm or if we make disclosure of existing or potential significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in those controls, investors could lose confidence in our financial reports, the price of our shares of common stock may decline, and we may be subject to increased risks and liabilities.

After we become a U.S. reporting company, we will be subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable rules and regulations thereunder. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require that we include a report of our management on our internal control over financial reporting and a report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning with our annual report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011. Our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent review, may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our internal controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from the way we interpret them.

If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could lead to a decline in the trading price of our shares of common stock. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from Nasdaq, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions.

We have limited sales, marketing and distribution experience.

We have a small internal team to support the training of appointed distributors in the marketing and clinical use of our Unitract 1mL syringes. Although we intend to expand this team as we commence sales of our Unitract 1mL syringes, appoint additional distributors and commercialize our larger-sized clinical syringes, we will have to devote significant financial and management resources to this effort. In developing our sales, marketing and distribution functions, we could face a number of risks, including:

•

we may not be able to attract and build a significant marketing or sales force;

•

the cost of establishing, training and providing regulatory oversight for a marketing or sales force may be substantial; and

•

there are significant legal and regulatory risks in medical device marketing and sales, and any failure to comply with all legal and regulatory requirements for sales, marketing and distribution could result in enforcement action by the FDA or other authorities that could jeopardize our ability to market our product(s) or could subject us to substantial liability.

We have outsourced the development of automated assembly systems for our Unifill syringe to Mikron Assembly Technology, a third-party contractor. Our ability to commercialize the Unifill syringe will be dependent on the ability of this contractor to provide these systems according to specifications and in a timely manner.

We have outsourced the development of automated assembly systems for our Unifill syringe to Mikron Assembly Technology, a third party equipment manufacturer. The development of a pilot system with a target production capacity of approximately 60 million units per year began in December 2009 with completion and installation scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2010. Additional assembly lines with higher annual manufacturing capacity are expected to commission and operate beyond 2010. The failure of this company to supply these automated assembly systems to us which meet contracted specifications in a timely manner will significantly impair our business activities and the completion of the industrialization program.

If we experience delays in developing our new manufacturing facility, our ability to produce our Unifill syringe in commercial quantities would be impaired, which would harm our business. In addition, all of our current commercial and production activity takes place in one facility which subjects us to risk if we were to experience a catastrophic event at this facility.

We have a 50,000 square foot FDA-registered, medical device production facility in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania, for the production of the Unilife 1mL syringes and for the future production of the Unifill syringes. However, we will need to expand our manufacturing capabilities in order to produce Unifill syringes and our other products in the quantities that may be necessary to meet anticipated market demand. We are in the process of developing additional manufacturing facilities in central Pennsylvania in conjunction with Keystone Redevelopment Group LLC, a Pennsylvania-based real estate company. We may not successfully complete the development of the new manufacturing facility in a timely manner, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may not be able to produce our products in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the launch of the products or to meet future demand, if at all.

In addition, because all of our operations are currently conducted out of our Lewisberry facility, a catastrophic event, such as fire, natural disaster, pandemic, war, terrorism, labor disruption or governmental actions taken in response to such an event, could severely disrupt our business activities and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our manufacturing facilities and the manufacturing facilities of our suppliers must comply with applicable regulatory requirements. If we or they fail to achieve or maintain regulatory approval for these manufacturing facilities, our business and our results of operations would be harmed.

Commercialization of our products requires access to, or the development of, manufacturing facilities that meet applicable regulatory standards to manufacture a sufficient supply of our products. In addition, the FDA must approve facilities that manufacture our products for US commercial purposes, as well as the manufacturing processes and specifications for the product. Suppliers of components of, and products used to manufacture, our products must also comply with FDA and foreign regulatory requirements, which often require significant time, money and record-keeping and quality assurance efforts and subject us and our suppliers to potential regulatory inspections and stoppages. We and our suppliers may not satisfy these requirements. If we or our suppliers do not achieve or maintain required regulatory approval for our manufacturing operations, our commercialization efforts could be delayed, which would harm our business and our results of operations.

The costs of raw materials have a significant impact on the level of expenses that we incur. If the prices of raw materials and related factors such as energy prices increase, and we cannot pass those price increases on to our customers, our results of operations and financial condition would suffer.

We use a number of raw materials including polymer plastics. The prices of many of these raw materials, such as those sourced from petroleum-based raw materials, are cyclical and volatile. While we would generally attempt to pass along increased costs to our customers in the form of sales price increases, we might not be able to do so, for competitive or contract-related reasons or otherwise. If we could not set our prices to reflect the costs of our raw materials, our results of operations and our financial condition would suffer.

Disruptions in the supply of key raw materials and difficulties in the supplier qualification process could adversely impact our operations.

We employ a supply chain management strategy which seeks to source components and materials from a number of established third party companies. Where possible, we seek to establish dual contracts for the supply of particular components or services. However, there is a risk that our supply lines may be interrupted in the event of a supplier production problem, material recall or financial difficulties. If one of our suppliers is unable to supply materials required for production of our products or our strategies for managing these risks are unsuccessful, we may be unable to complete the production of sufficient quantities of product to fulfill customer orders, or complete the qualification of new replacement materials for some programs in time to meet future production requirements. Prolonged disruptions in the supply of any of our key raw materials, difficulty in completing qualification of new sources of supply, or in implementing the use of replacement materials or new sources of supply, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, our financial condition or cash flows.

Some companies we may utilize for the supply of components are also competitors, and they could elect to cease supply relationships with us in the future for competitive reasons.

Some companies we may utilize for the supply of components for the Unifill syringe also develop and market their own safety products which can be attached onto standard prefilled syringes. These companies may elect to cease supply relationships with us in the future for competitive reasons. This may disrupt our supply chain, cause difficulties in the qualification of new sources of supply and impair our ability to supply customer orders. Such events may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, our financial condition or cash flows.

The medical device industry is very competitive.

Competition in the medical device industry is intense. We face this competition from a wide range of companies. These include large medical device companies, most of which have greater financial and human resources, distribution channels and sales and marketing capabilities than we do. Our ability to compete effectively depends upon our ability to distinguish our company and our products from our competitors and their products. Factors affecting our competitive position include, for example, product design and performance, product safety, sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, success and timing of new product development and introductions and intellectual property protection.

We may be adversely impacted by next generation drug delivery technologies.

Much of our potential sales and potential profitability depends to a large extent on the sale of drug products delivered by subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. Other device companies, and pharmaceutical companies, are attempting to develop alternative therapies or drug administration systems such as needle-free or intradermal injection technology for the treatment or prevention of various diseases. The development of new or improved products, processes or technologies by other companies may render our products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive. If the products developed in the future by our customers or potential customers use another delivery system, our sales and potential profitability could suffer. Furthermore, we will be largely reliant upon the receipt of revenues from the sale of the Unifill syringe and the Unilife 1mL syringe and will not have the benefit of diversification.

We are subject to extensive regulation.

We are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA pursuant to the FDC Act, by comparable agencies in other countries, and by other regulatory agencies and governing bodies. Our products must receive clearance or approval from the FDA or counterpart non-U.S. regulatory agencies before they can be marketed or sold. The process for obtaining marketing approval or clearance may take a significant period of time and require the expenditure of substantial resources. The process may also require changes to our products or result in limitations on the indicated uses of the products. In addition, regulatory requirements outside the U.S. change frequently, requiring prompt action to maintain compliance, particularly when product modifications are required.

Following the introduction of a product, these agencies also periodically review our manufacturing processes and product performance. Our failure to comply with the applicable good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting, clinical trial and other requirements of these agencies could delay or prevent the production, marketing or sale of our products and result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation.

We are subject to regulation by governments around the world, and if these regulations are not complied with, existing and future operations may be curtailed, and we could be subject to liability.

The design, development, manufacturing, marketing and labeling of our products are subject to regulation by governmental authorities in the United States, Europe and other countries, including the FDA. The regulatory process can result in required modification or withdrawal of existing products and a substantial delay in the introduction of new products. Also, it is possible that regulatory approval may not be obtained for a new product. Our business may be adversely affected by changes in the regulation of drug products and medical devices.

Our target pharmaceutical customers are also subject to government regulations for the manufacturing, approval, marketing and labeling of therapeutic drug products. An effect of the governmental regulation of our customers’ injectable drug products and manufacturing processes is that compliance with regulations makes it costly and time consuming to transition to the use of our devices for existing products, or to secure approval for pipeline products targeted for use with our devices. If regulation of our customers’ products incorporating our devices increases over time, it is likely that this would adversely affect our sales and profitability.

Product defects could adversely affect the results of our operations.

The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, unanticipated use of our products, or inadequate disclosure of risks relating to the use of the product can lead to injury or other adverse events. These events could lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to our products (either voluntary or required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of a product from the market. Any recall could result in significant costs, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation that could reduce demand for our products. Personal injuries relating to the use of our products can also result in product liability claims being brought against us. In some circumstances, such adverse events could also cause delays in new product approvals.

We may be sued for product liability, which could adversely affect our business.

The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices carries a significant risk of product liability claims. We may be held liable if any product we develop and commercialize causes injury or is found otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing, sale or consumer use. In addition, the safety studies we must perform and the regulatory approvals required to commercialize our medical safety products will not protect us from any such liability. We carry product liability insurance. However, if there were to be product liability claims against us, our insurance may be insufficient to cover the expense of defending against such claims, or may be insufficient to pay or settle such claims. Furthermore, we may be unable to obtain adequate product liability insurance coverage for commercial sales of any of our approved products. If such insurance is insufficient to protect us, our results of operations will suffer. If any product liability claim is made against us, our reputation and future sales will be damaged, even if we have adequate insurance coverage. We also intend to seek product liability insurance for any approved products that we may develop or acquire in the future. There is no guarantee that such coverage will be available when we seek it or at a reasonable cost to us.

We may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection in the United States and other countries of the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our technology and products. Our intellectual property portfolio includes, in addition to trademarks and trade secrets, 24 issued patents in 13 countries, a significant number of patent applications pending in the United States, Australia and the countries covered under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Our patents expire at various dates between 2018 and 2028. Our pending and future patent applications may not issue as patents or, if issued, may not issue in a form that will provide us with any competitive advantage. Even if issued, existing or future patents may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented, which could limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing similar products or limit the length of terms of patent protection we may have for our products. Changes in patent laws or their interpretation in the United States and other countries could also diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our patent protection. In addition, the legal systems of certain countries do not favor the aggressive enforcement of patents, and the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours. In order to preserve and enforce our patent and other intellectual property rights, we may need to make claims or file lawsuits against third parties. This can entail significant costs to us and divert our management’s attention from developing and commercializing our products.

Intellectual property litigation could be costly and disruptive to us.

The retractable syringe product lines in which we compete are relatively new inventions with numerous companies having patents. In recent years, there have been several patent infringement suits involving other industry participants. To-date, we have not been subject to any such patent infringement suits and also hold freedom to operate reports which we believe indicate that our technology and associated products are substantially different from other known patents. There is no assurance, however, that third parties will not assert any patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies used in our business. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel or require us to pay substantial damages. If we are unsuccessful in defending ourselves against these types of claims, we may be required to do one or more of the following:

•

stop, delay or abandon our ongoing or planned commercialization of the product that is the subject of the suit;

	•		attempt to obtain a license to sell or use the relevant technology or substitute technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; or

	•		redesign those products that use the relevant technology.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology and products could be adversely affected.

In addition to patented technology, we rely on our unpatented proprietary technology, trade secrets, processes and know-how. We generally seek to protect this information by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and third parties. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors. To the extent that our employees, consultants or contractors use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.

Impairment of our goodwill, which represents a significant portion of our total assets, would adversely affect our net income and we may never realize the full value of our goodwill.

A substantial portion of our assets is composed of goodwill, which we recorded as a result of our acquisition activities. Goodwill is subject to, at a minimum, an annual impairment assessment of its carrying value. Goodwill impairment is deemed to possibly exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Any material impairment of our goodwill would likely have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Currently, the majority of our revenues are derived from payments under our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis which provides that sanofi-aventis will pay us in euros, while we incur most of our operating expenses in U.S. dollars or Australian dollars. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates can affect the value of our assets and liabilities, and the amount of our revenues and expenses. We do not currently try to mitigate our exposure to currency exchange rate risks by using hedging transactions. We cannot predict future changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and as a result, we may suffer losses as a result of future fluctuations.

Risk Factors Related to Our Shares of Common Stock

An active trading market for our shares of common stock in the United States may not develop and the trading price of our shares of common stock may fluctuate significantly.

Prior to the effective date of this registration statement, UMSL’s ordinary shares have not been listed on any U.S. securities exchange and there has been only a limited trading market in its shares in the United States. Although we intend to apply to list our shares of common stock on Nasdaq, a liquid public market for our shares may not develop in the United States. If an active trading market does not develop in the United States, the market price and liquidity of our shares may be adversely affected.

Prior to the redomiciliation, the ordinary shares of UMSL were traded on the ASX. After the redomiciliation, Unilife Corporation will replace UMSL as the listed entity on the ASX and its shares of common stock will be traded on the ASX in the form of CDIs. It is possible that the development of an active trading market in the United States may be adversely impacted by the existence of a trading market for CDIs in Australia.

The price of UMSL’s ordinary shares on ASX has been volatile and it is likely that the price of our shares, on both Nasdaq and the ASX, may also be volatile, which means that it could decline substantially within a short period of time. The trading price of the shares may fluctuate, and investors may experience a decrease in the value of the shares that they hold, sometimes regardless of our operating performance or prospects. The trading price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including the following:


	•		future announcements concerning our business and that of our competitors including in particular, the progress of our industrialization program for the Unifill syringe;

•

regulatory developments, enforcement actions bearing on advertising, marketing or sales of our current or pipeline products;

•

quarterly variations in operating results;

•

introduction of new products or changes in product pricing policies by us or our competitors;

•

acquisition or loss of significant customers, distributors or suppliers;

•

business acquisitions or divestitures;

•

changes in third party reimbursement practices;

•

fluctuations of investor interest in the medical device sector; and

•

fluctuations in the economy, world political events or general market conditions.

If there are substantial sales of our shares of common stock, our share price could decline.

As of September 30, 2009, we had 37,010,802 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. We issued 6,291,535 additional shares of common stock to certain investors in October and November of 2009. All of our shares of common stock that will be outstanding at the time of the redomiciliation, other than approximately [____] shares held by our affiliates, will be freely tradable. Commencing 90 days after the effectiveness of this registration statement, shares held by our affiliates will be eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144. If our stockholders sell a large number of shares of common stock or the public market, should one develop, perceives that our stockholders might sell a large number of shares, the prices at which our common stock trades could decline significantly.

In addition, as of September 30, 2009, 5,587,500 shares of our common stock were subject to outstanding stock options. In November 2009, we issued options to purchase 3,645,767 additional shares of common stock to certain investors, placement agents and advisors in connection with our recent financing. After the redomiciliation transaction, we plan to file a registration statement on Form S-8 to cover the issuance of approximately [____] shares of our common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options or options that may be issued in the future under our employee benefit plans. We may also file a registration statement on Form S-1 or another appropriate form to cover the resale of shares of our common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of options not eligible for inclusion in a registration statement on Form S-8. Even if no such registration statement is filed, the shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options may be sold in reliance upon Rule 144 or another exemption from registration. The exercise of those options may have a dilutive effect on current stockholders and if those parties exercising their options choose to sell their shares, it could have an adverse effect on the market price for our shares.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

For the foreseeable future, we do not intend to declare or pay any dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business and product lines. Any future decision to declare or pay dividends will be made by our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors including our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, under our current bank financing agreements, we are not permitted to pay cash dividends without the prior written consent of the lender.

We may be subject to arbitrage risks.

Investors may seek to profit by exploiting the difference, if any, in the price of our shares of common stock on the Nasdaq and on the ASX. Such arbitrage activities could cause our stock price in the market with the higher value to decrease to the price set by the market with the lower value.

Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, the Delaware General Corporation Law and the terms of our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis may delay or deter a change of control transaction.

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of deterring takeovers, such as those provisions authorizing our board of directors to issue, from time to time, any series of preferred stock and fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of such series of preferred stock; prohibiting stockholders from acting by written consent in lieu of a meeting; requiring advance notice of stockholder intention to put forth director nominees or bring up other business at a stockholders’ meeting; prohibiting stockholders from calling a special meeting of stockholders; requiring a 66 - ²/₃ % majority stockholder approval in order for stockholders to amend our bylaws or adopt new bylaws; and providing that, subject to the rights of preferred shares, the number of directors is to be fixed exclusively by our board of directors. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, from which we did not elect to opt out, provides that if a holder acquires 15% or more of our stock without prior approval of our board of directors, that holder will be subject to certain restrictions on its ability to acquire us within three years. In addition, our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis provides to sanofi-aventis the right to match a change of control proposal and to terminate the industrialization agreement under certain circumstances of a change of control event. See “Business — Strategic Partnership with sanofi-aventis”. These provisions may delay or deter a change of control of us, and could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.


Item 2.		Financial Information

Selected Financial Data

The following table presents our selected statement of operations data for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the years in the five year period ended June 30, 2009 and our selected balance sheet data as of September 30, 2009 and as of June 30 of each year in the five year period ended June 30, 2009. The statement of operations data for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2009 have been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this registration statement. The statement of operations data for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this registration statement. All such data should be read in conjunction with the information under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this registration statement. The statement of operations data for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the balance sheet data as of June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements not included in this registration statement.


	Three months ended
	September 30,						Year ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2007 (b)			2006			2005
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues	$	3,108		$	2,305		$	19,976	(a)	$	3,500		$	2,070		$	112		$	42
Net loss		(2,064	)		(1,616	)		(517	)		(8,537	)		(8,969	)		(8,220	)		(6,466	)
Basic loss per share		(0.06	)		(0.05	)		(0.02	)		(0.26	)		(0.38	)		(0.35	)		(0.41	)
Diluted loss per share		(0.06	)		(0.05	)		(0.02	)		(0.26	)		(0.38	)		(0.35	)		(0.41	)

Balance Sheet Data (end of period):
Total assets	$	30,713		$	24,058		$	32,212		$	18,499		$	16,926		$	9,953			13,872
Long-term debt, including current portion		2,991			3,657			3,133			7,209			4,261			106			157


(a)		Includes $16.1 million in connection with our exclusive licensing agreement and our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis.

(b)		Includes the results of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. since we acquired it on January 1, 2007.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated and condensed financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this registration statement. This discussion and analysis includes certain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should review the “Risk Factors” section of this registration statement for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by such forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information” at the beginning of this registration statement. References to our fiscal year refer to the fiscal year ending June 30.

Redomiciliation

On September 1, 2009, UMSL entered into a Merger Implementation Agreement with Unilife Corporation, pursuant to which shareholders and optionholders of UMSL will exchange their existing interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife Corporation, and Unilife Corporation will become the parent company of UMSL and its subsidiaries. The redomiciliation will be conducted by way of schemes of arrangement under Australian law. The issuance of our common stock and stock options under the schemes of arrangement will be exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Under the schemes, each holder of UMSL ordinary shares or share options will receive one share of our common stock or an option to purchase one share of our common stock, for every six UMSL ordinary shares or share options, respectively, held by such holder, unless a holder of UMSL ordinary shares elects to receive, in lieu of our common stock, our Chess Depositary Interests, or CDIs (each representing one-sixth of a share of our common stock), in which case such holder will receive one CDI for every UMSL ordinary share. UMSL’s ordinary shares are currently listed on the ASX. Subject to approval by the ASX, Unilife Corporation will replace UMSL as the ASX-listed entity and our CDIs will be listed on ASX. Each CDI will, in general terms, be equivalent to one existing UMSL ordinary share and six CDIs will, in general terms, be equivalent to one share of our common stock. We are applying for the listing of our common stock on Nasdaq and have filed this registration statement in order to register our common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act. The redomiciliation will occur prior to the effectiveness of this registration statement.

The redomiciliation transaction is subject to various conditions, including without limitation, approval by the Australian Federal Court, approval by the shareholders and optionholders of UMSL, and a report by an independent expert concluding that the redomiciliation transaction is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the shareholders and optionholders.

Overview

We are a U.S.-based medical device company focused on the design, development, manufacture and supply of a proprietary range of retractable syringes. Primary target customers for our products include pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers of medical equipment to healthcare facilities and patients who self-administer prescription medication. All of our syringes incorporate automatic and fully-integrated safety features which are designed to protect those at risk of needlestick injuries and other unsafe injection practices.

Our main product is the Unifill ready-to-fill syringe, which is designed to be supplied to pharmaceutical manufacturers in a form that is ready for filling with their injectable drugs and vaccines. We have a strategic partnership with sanofi-aventis, a large global pharmaceutical company, pursuant to which it has paid us a €10 million exclusivity fee and has committed to pay us up to an additional €17 million to fund our industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. Upon the scheduled completion of the industrialization program in late 2010, we expect to commence the supply and sale of the Unifill syringe to sanofi-aventis. We are also in discussions with other pharmaceutical companies that are seeking to obtain access to the Unifill syringe.

In addition, we have recently begun to manufacture our Unitract 1mL insulin syringes at our FDA-registered manufacturing facility in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania. Our Unitract 1mL syringes are designed primarily for use in healthcare facilities and by patients who self-administer prescription medication such as insulin. We have recently begun U.S. production of this syringe, which we expect to release commercially in early 2010.

Recent Developments

Recent Equity Financing

On October 8, 2009, UMSL issued 3,460,344 ordinary shares in a private placement to a group of sophisticated and professional Australian investors and accredited investors in the United States, and subject to shareholder approval, agreed to issue to the investors an additional 2,831,191 ordinary shares and options to purchase 3,145,767 ordinary shares. UMSL obtained shareholder approval for the issuance of the additional ordinary shares and share options at a meeting held on November 13, 2009. All of the ordinary shares were issued at a price of A$5.10 per share for aggregate proceeds of A$32.1 million and all of the share options were issued for no additional consideration. Each of the share options is exercisable within three years after the date of grant. Half of the share options have an exercise price of A$7.50 per share, and the other half of the share options have an exercise price of A$12.00 per share. In conjunction with the private placement, UMSL’s Australian and New Zealand shareholders were offered, and some of them purchased, ordinary shares under a share purchase plan, at a price of A$5.10 per share, for a total consideration of A$21.5 million. In addition, after receiving shareholder approval on November 13, 2009, UMSL issued share options to purchase up to 500,000 ordinary shares to certain advisors and brokers as compensation for their services with respect to the private placement and the share purchase plan. These share options have the same terms as the share options issued to the investors. The proceeds from the private placement and the share purchase plan will be used to accelerate the expansion of our U.S. operational capabilities and production facilities, to purchase capital equipment and complete the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe.

While the private placement was conducted by UMSL prior to the redomiciliation, all of the share numbers and share option exercise prices referred to above give effect to the share consolidation we will effect in connection with the redomiciliation (one share of our common stock equals six ordinary shares of UMSL). The ordinary shares and share options issued in the placement will be exchanged for shares of our common stock and options to purchase our common stock in connection with the redomiciliation.

Pennsylvania Economic Development Assistance

During October 2009, we accepted a $5.2 million offer of assistance from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The offer includes $2.0 million for the development of our new global headquarters and manufacturing facility as well as up to $2.0 million in low-interest financing loans for land, building, acquisition and construction costs. The offer also includes a $0.5 million opportunity grant as well as $0.5 million in tax credits. Finally, the offer includes up to $0.2 million for the reimbursement of eligible job training costs. The offer is based on our proposed project being expected to create more than 200 new full-time jobs by December 31, 2012, to retain our 97 existing employees and to have a total cost of $86.0 million and is contingent upon us submitting complete applications and meeting all program guidelines. We cannot assure you that we will be able to receive all or any of the assistance for our current development project or otherwise.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that could affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The following accounting policies require significant estimates, judgments and assumptions.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the value of net assets acquired in business acquisitions. Goodwill is subject to, at a minimum, an annual impairment assessment of its carrying value. Additional impairment assessments would be performed if events and circumstances warranted such additional assessments during the year. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimated fair values of the reporting units are estimated using an earnings model and a discounted cash flow valuation model. The discounted cash flow model incorporates management’s estimates of future cash flows, allocations of certain assets and cash flows among reporting units, future growth rates and management’s judgment regarding the applicable discount rates used to discount those estimated cash flows. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit, if lower than the carrying value of the respective reporting unit (such carrying value determined after management allocation of certain shared assets), would then be allocated to the reporting unit’s net identifiable assets based on their respective estimated fair values. The remaining unallocated reporting unit fair value, if any, would then be compared to the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill and, if lower, the Company would recognize an impairment charge to the extent of the deficiency. We did not record any goodwill impairments during fiscal 2009, 2008 or 2007.

The Company currently has two reporting units, each a component of its single syringe manufacturing operating segment. One reporting unit is comprised of our contract manufacturing business which was acquired in our January 2007 acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and primarily assembles syringes for its limited customers. This reporting unit has no goodwill. The second reporting unit is comprised of our developing Unitract and Unifill syringe business, the base technology which we obtained as part of our November 2002 acquisition of Unitract Syringe Pty Limited and the manufacturing capability which we obtained in our acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc.

In estimating the reporting unit’s fair value for purposes of the Company’s fiscal 2009 impairment assessments, management prepared a cash flow analysis for the following five years, limited to the expected cash flows from solely the Unitract business. Key assumptions used in the cash flow analysis included a) sales volume which was dependent on expected timing of the completion of the various phases of our production capabilities, b) selling prices we expect to achieve based on our market studies and indications from identified willing buyers of this product, c) gross margins of 26% to 40%, and d) a discount rate of 10%. While our Unitract syringe has only recently been commercialized after its regulatory approval in the United States and has yet to achieve significant sales, management believes that the assumptions used in the cash flow analysis are reasonable. Included in the cash flows analysis is expected expenditure needed to build up our Unitract production capability. While we expect the Unifill syringe business to be profitable, including a fairly short payback period on the costs to build production lines dedicated to the Unifill syringe, we did not include any of that expected business or development in our 2009 estimated cash flows analysis. Even without this Unifill business, the resulting estimated fair value of the Unitract portion of this reporting unit was in excess of the reporting unit’s entire carrying value by 68%.

In addition to the above, management compared the estimated fair value of the Unitract business portion of our second reporting unit to the Company’s market capitalization as of June 30, 2009. Market capitalization of $55.7 million was well in excess of the Unitract business’ fair value. Management also considered that market capitalization through early November 2009 continued to be in excess of the Unitract business’ fair value, thereby providing some further assurance that the reporting unit is not impaired.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense relating to options to purchase common stock is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the related stock option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the exception of grants subject to market conditions which are valued based on a Barrier option pricing model. These models use various assumptions including the expected dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility and the expected life. We have not historically paid dividends to our shareholders, and, as a result, we have assumed a dividend yield of 0%. The risk free interest rate is based upon the rates of Australian bonds with a term equal to that of the option. The expected volatility is based upon our historical share price. The expected life of the options to purchase common stock is based upon the outstanding contractual term of the stock option on the date of grant.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from licensing fees, industrialization efforts and products sold.

In June 2008, we granted an exclusive licensing arrangement to allow our pharmaceutical partner to use certain of our intellectual property in order and solely to develop in collaboration with us, our Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the pre-filled syringe market. The up-front, non-refundable fee paid for this license is being amortized over the expected life of the related agreement. In late fiscal 2009, we entered into an industrialization agreement with our pharmaceutical partner, retroactive to July 2008, under which we received payments upon achievement of certain pre-defined milestones in our development of the Unifill syringe. Revenue is recognized upon achievement of the “at risk” milestone events, which represents the culmination of the earnings process related to such events. Milestones include specific phases of the project such as product design, prototype availability, user tests, manufacturing proof of principle and the various steps to complete the industrialization of the product. Specific payment amounts and completion dates were established for each milestone payment. Revenue recognized is commensurate with the milestones achieved. Billings are similarly triggered, and we have no future performance obligations related to previous milestone payments. Each milestone payment is non-refundable when made.

We recognize revenue from sales of products at the time of shipment and when title passes to the customer.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.


	Three months ended
	September 30,							Year ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2007
							(in thousands)
Revenues	$	3,108		$	2,305		$	19,976		$	3,500		$	2,070
Cost of sales		865			1,131			3,537			2,456			1,561

Gross profit		2,243			1,174			16,439			1,044			509

Operating expenses:
Research and development		399			131			1,048			532			265
Selling, general, and administrative		3,742			2,422			14,941			8,211			6,497
Depreciation and amortization		255			144			804			636			169
Impairment of property, plant and equipment		—			—			—			—			547
Loss on the sale of property, plant and equipment		—			—			—			—			1,608

Total operating expenses		4,396			2,697			16,793			9,379			9,086

Operating loss		(2,153	)		(1,523	)		(354	)		(8,335	)		(8,577	)
Interest expense		47			125			249			459			537
Interest income		(5	)		(120	)		(361	)		(203	)		(111	)
Other (income) expense, net		(131	)		88			275			(54	)		(34	)

Net loss	$	(2,064	)	$	(1,616	)	$	(517	)	$	(8,537	)	$	(8,969	)

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding		36,762,142			34,348,301			34,426,353			32,938,477			23,413,811

Loss per share — basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.38	)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008

Revenues. Revenues increased by $0.8 million or 34.8%. The increase was primarily attributable to $1.7 million in revenue recognized under our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis based on milestones achieved during the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in revenues was partially offset by a $0.9 million decrease in revenue earned from our contract manufacturing business.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales decreased by $0.3 million or 23.5%. The decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in contract manufacturing sales and development activity, as no cost of sales were associated with the revenue recognized under the exclusive licensing and industrialization agreements.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $0.3 million, or 204.6% primarily as a result of additional expenditures to finalize the product specifications of our Unifill syringe.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.3 million or 54.5%. During the later part of fiscal 2009 and the three months ended September 30, 2009, we increased the workforce at our Lewisberry, Pennsylvania facility, and as a result incurred $0.7 million in additional payroll and other employee-related expenses and recruiting fees during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2009, our share-based compensation expense, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, increased by $0.5 million. The increase resulted from the issuance of a significant number of stock options to employees, directors and consultants during the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.1 million or 77.1%, which was primarily attributable to $1.8 million we spent to purchase additional property, plant and equipment during the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.1 million, primarily as a result lower levels of outstanding debt.

Interest income. Interest income decreased by $0.1 million, primarily as a result of fluctuations in interest rates.

Other (income) expense. Other income during the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.1 million compared to other expense of $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of the appreciation of the US dollar against Australian dollar.

Income taxes. Due to the significant net operating losses recorded over the recent years, the Company fully offsets any related income tax benefits with increases to its valuation allowance, thereby resulting in no income tax provision or benefit recorded for either period.

Loss per share Due to the factors described above, net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $2.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per share was $0.06 and $0.05, respectively, on weighted average shares outstanding of 36,762,142 and 34,348,301, respectively. The increase in the weighted average shares outstanding was due to issuances of common stock in connection with option exercises during the three months ended September 30, 2009, as well as the issuance of 1.7 million shares of common stock to our chief executive officer in November 2008.

Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008

Revenues. Revenues increased by $16.5 million or 470.7%. The increase was primarily attributable to $13.6 million in revenue recognized under our industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis based on milestones achieved during fiscal 2009. Additionally, we recognized $2.5 million in revenue under our exclusive licensing agreement with sanofi-aventis based on amortizing over the term of the related agreement the up front, non-refundable intellectual property licensing fee we received. Revenues from our contract manufacturing business decreased by $0.7 million in fiscal 2009.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales increased by $1.1 million or 44.0%. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the cost of plastics and commodities we use to assemble certain of our products within our contract business line and to higher payroll-related expenses resulting from hiring additional manufacturing personnel. There was no cost of sales associated with the exclusive licensing or industrialization agreements.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $0.5 million, or 97.0% primarily as a result of additional expenditures to finalize the product specifications of our Unifill syringe.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $6.7 million or 82.0%. During 2009, we significantly increased our workforce at our Lewisberry, Pennsylvania headquarters and manufacturing facility, which included hiring over ten management-level personnel for our operational, regulatory affairs and finance departments. As a result of these hires, we incurred $2.5 million in additional payroll, employee-related expenses and recruiting fees. In addition, we incurred $1.0 million in legal, consulting and professional fees, primarily related to our anticipated Nasdaq listing. Finally, during fiscal 2009, our share-based compensation expense, included in selling general and administrative expense, increased by $2.2 million. Of this increase, $1.5 million is due to the issuance of 1.7 million shares of common stock to our Chief Executive Officer in December 2008 and $0.7 million is due to additional expense resulting from significant issuances of stock options to employees, directors and consultants during fiscal 2009.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.2 million or 26.4%, which was primarily attributable to $3.0 million we spent to purchase additional property, plant and equipment.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.2 million, primarily as a result of higher levels of outstanding debt during the prior year.

Interest income. Interest income increased by $0.2 million during fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of fluctuations in interest rates.

Other expense (income). Other expense during fiscal 2009 was $0.3 million compared to other income of $0.1 million during fiscal 2008, primarily as a result of the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against Australian dollar.

Income taxes. Due to the significant net operating losses recorded in recent years, we fully offset any related income tax benefits with increases to our valuation allowance, thereby resulting in no income tax provision or benefit recorded for either year.

Loss per share Due to the factors described above, net losses for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0.5 million and $8.5 million, respectively, with both basic and diluted losses per share totaling $0.02 and $0.26, respectively, on weighted average shares outstanding of 34,426,353 and 32,938,477 respectively. The increase in weighted-average shares outstanding is primarily due to 1.7 million shares of common stock issued to our chief executive officer in November 2008.

Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007

Revenues. Revenues increased by $1.4 million or 69.1%. The increase was primarily attributable to a full year of contract manufacturing business as compared to only six months in fiscal 2007, resulting from the acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. in January 2007.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales increased by $0.9 million or 57.3%. The increase was primarily attributable to a full year of contract manufacturing business as compared to only six months in fiscal 2007, resulting from the acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. in January 2007.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by $0.3 million, or 100.8% primarily as a result of additional expenditures related to the development of our Unifill syringe.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.7 million or 26.4%. The increase is attributable to a full year of contract manufacturing business as compared to only six months in fiscal 2007, resulting from the acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. in January 2007. The increase is also attributable to a $0.3 million increase in non-cash compensation expense, which is included in selling general and administrative expense.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.5 million or 276.3%, which was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. in January 2007.

Impairment of property, plant and equipment and associated loss on sale. During fiscal 2007, we ceased operations at an Australian facility and made the determination not to relocate the manufacturing equipment to the new U.S. facility. As a result, we recorded an impairment on property, plant and equipment of $0.5 million. We sold the equipment and recorded a loss of $1.6 million.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.1 million, primarily as a result of lower interest expense related to the convertible notes issued during December 2006, as a majority of the notes were converted during fiscal 2007.

Interest income. Interest income increased by $0.1 million, primarily as a result of fluctuations in interest rates.

Other expense (income). Other income during fiscal 2008 and 2007 was $0.1 million.

Income taxes. Due to the significant net operating losses recorded over the recent years, we fully offset any related income tax benefits with increases to our valuation allowance, thereby resulting in no income tax provision or benefit recorded for either year.

Loss per share. Due to the factors described above, net losses for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $8.5 million and $9.0 million, respectively, with both basic and diluted losses per share totaling $0.26 and $0.38, respectively, on weighted average shares outstanding of 32,938,477 and 23,413,811 respectively. The increase in weighted average shares outstanding is due to issuances of common stock related to the private placement and conversion of convertible debt into common stock during fiscal 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, we have funded our operations primarily from a combination of equity issuances by UMSL prior to the redomiciliation, borrowings under our bank term loans and payments from sanofi-aventis under our exclusive licensing and industrialization agreements. UMSL raised $2.2 million from its initial public offering in Australia in 2002, and since that offering, UMSL raised an aggregate of $31.9 million through private placements of ordinary shares. As of September 30, 2009, cash and cash equivalents were $4.0 million and our long-term debt was $3.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, cash and cash equivalents were $3.6 million and our long-term debt was $3.1 million. As described above under “Recent Equity Financing,” since July 1, 2009, we have also raised approximately A$32.1 million in equity financing. We also expect to receive $5.2 million in assistance from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and €5.5 million of additional milestone-based payments from sanofi-aventis under the industrialization agreement during fiscal 2010. We believe that our cash on hand, together with the amount described above will be sufficient to fund our operations and business expansion activities (other than the full development of a new manufacturing facility) through the next 12 months.

We are in the process of developing a new manufacturing facility in central Pennsylvania. We estimate the total cost of the development to be approximately $26.0 million. We intend to fund approximately $9.0 million of the cost from our own cash reserves and seek external financing for up to approximately $17.0 million for construction during the next 12 months.

We expect to fund the costs of the redomiciliation through cash from operations and cash on hand. These expenditures will be expensed as incurred. Additionally, we will incur increased costs as a result of becoming a U.S. reporting company, primarily in areas of human resources, tax, risk management, accounting and financial reporting, investor relations, legal and other services.

We expect that the costs we will incur in connection with the completion of our industrialization program will be offset by the revenue we earn under the industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis.

The following table summarizes our cash flows during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007:


		Three months ended September 30,						Year ended June 30,
	(in thousands)
		2009			2008			2009			2008			2007
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		$	2,119		$	11,290		$	6,795		$	(7,623	)	$	(5,010	)
Investing activities			(1,735	)		(98	)		(2,912	)		(624	)		(2,355	)
Financing activities			346			(3,056	)		(3,265	)		7,882			8,378

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $2.1 million compared to $11.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in cash flow was primarily due to the 2008 receipt of $12.7 million under the exclusive licensing agreement with sanofi-aventis.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $1.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to costs incurred in connection with the purchase of machinery related to the pilot lines for our Unifill syringe.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.3 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $3.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we received $0.5 million from the issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options and made $0.1 million in principal payments on our long-term debt. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we elected to terminate a licensing agreement that we determined was no longer consistent with our business strategies, and, as a final settlement, we repaid $2.3 million of the $3.0 million that we had originally received in 2008 under the licensing agreement, while retaining $0.7 million to cover related legal fees.

Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2009 was $6.8 million compared to net cash used in operating activities $7.6 million during fiscal 2008. The increase in cash flow was primarily due to $10.4 million of higher net income after adding back depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation expense. The increase was also attributable to $9.8 million of deferred revenue recorded in connection with our exclusivity agreement with sanofi-aventis, which was partially offset by amounts due from sanofi aventis under our industrialization agreement. Theses agreements were entered into during fiscal 2009.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $2.3 million, primarily due to significant costs incurred in connection with the production of machinery used in the manufacturing of our Unitract 1 mL Syringe. Additionally, during fiscal 2009, we incurred significant leasehold improvement costs at our Lewisberry, Pennsylvania headquarters and manufacturing facility.

During fiscal 2010, we expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $12.0 million to purchase machinery required to manufacture our Unifill syringe and approximately $1.5 million to purchase machinery for the production of our Unitract 1 mL syringe. We may incur additional, less significant capital expenditures for general equipment, furniture and fixtures.

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $3.3 million during fiscal 2009 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $7.9 million during fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, we elected to terminate a licensing agreement that we determined was no longer consistent with our business strategies, and, as a final settlement, we repaid $2.3 million of the $3.0 million that we had originally received in 2008 under the licensing agreement, while retaining $0.7 million to cover related legal fees. During fiscal 2008, we received $2.8 million from the issuance of common stock and $1.9 million from the issuance of convertible debt.

Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $7.6 million during fiscal 2008 as compared to $5.0 million during fiscal 2007. The increase in cash flow was primarily due to $0.9 million of lower income after adding back depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense, impairment and a loss on the sale of property, plant and equipment in connection with the closing of a factory in Australia.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $1.7 million during fiscal 2008 due to a decrease in the purchase of property, plant and equipment. During fiscal 2007, we incurred significant up-front fees in connection with the production of our machinery used to manufacture our 1 mL syringe.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.9 million during fiscal 2008 compared with $8.4 million during fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2008, we received $2.8 million from the issuance of common stock and $1.9 million from the issuance of convertible debt. During fiscal 2007, we received $3.5 million and $4.4 million from the issuance of common stock and convertible debt, respectively.

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information regarding our contractual cash obligations as of June 30, 2009:


	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
	(In Thousands)
Long-term debt	$	3,133	$	405	$	653	$	541	$	1,534
Interest		811		148		222		170		271
Operating leases		1,253		455		755		43		—

Total contractual cash obligations	$	5,197	$	1,008	$	1,630	$	754	$	1,805

Our term loans bear interest at a rate of prime plus 1.50%. The future contractual cash obligations for interest is based upon 4.75%, which is the prime rate as of June 30, 2009 (3.25%) plus 1.50%.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as such term is defined in the SEC rules.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 represents the last numbered standard issued by the FASB under the old (pre-codification) numbering system, and amends the GAAP hierarchy. On July 1, 2009, the FASB launched its new codification (i.e. the FASB Accounting Standards Codification). The codification supersedes existing GAAP for nongovernmental entities. This Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We have adopted this Codification during our quarter ended September 30, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 805, Business Combinations, formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised), “Business Combinations.” ASC 805 significantly changes the accounting and disclosure requirements for business combinations. ASC 805 is effective for business combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. ASC 805 will be applied prospectively to business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the effective date. The impact that the adoption of ASC 805 will have on our consolidated financial statements will be dependent upon the extent of future business combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 810, Consolidation, formerly SFAS No. 160, “Non controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — and amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51”. This new standard establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. ASC 810 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We currently have no noncontrolling interests and therefore, do not believe that the adoption of ASC 810 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 350 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, formerly FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. This new standard amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS Statement 142,”Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This new standard also provides guidance for expanded disclosures related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. We do not believe that the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, formerly FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. This new standard states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do not believe that the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 855, Subsequent Events, formerly SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events.” ASC 855 sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides guidance on how to measure liabilities at fair value in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. This update is effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. We have no liabilities that are governed by this update but will apply its provisions in the future as applicable.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in our results of operations and cash flows.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk is limited to our cash that is invested in money market funds with highly liquid short term investments and our variable interest rate term loans. We currently do not utilize derivative instruments to mitigate changes in interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations

The majority of our revenues are derived from payments under our industrialization agreement received in euros while we incur most of our expenses in U.S. dollars and Australian dollars. For U.S. reporting purposes, we translate all assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. entities into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of the end of the related period and we translate all revenues and expenses of our non-U.S. entities using the average exchange rate during the applicable period. We currently do not utilize options or forward contracts to mitigate changes in foreign currency exchange rates.


Item 3.		Properties

We currently lease approximately 50,000 square feet of a building in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania under an operating lease expiring in August 2012 of which approximately 6,000 square feet are being used as our executive offices and the remaining 44,000 square feet are being used as our manufacturing facility and warehouse. The manufacturing facility is an FDA-registered medical device production facility. This facility has two class-eight clean rooms. The first clean room houses a fully automated assembly system used to manufacture our Unitract 1mL syringes. The other clean room is used to assemble non-proprietary medical devices under contract for outsourcing customers. Other areas of the manufacturing facility are used for offices, product design and prototyping, engineering activities and the construction of automated assembly systems.

We have also entered into a short-term lease for a small office building near our main facility. This office building is used for engineering and product development.

We also occupy an office of 1,100 square feet in Sydney, Australia under a lease expiring in May 2010. This office space is used for certain finance and administrative operations in Australia.

Development of New Global Headquarters and Manufacturing Facility

To support our business expansion activities, we are in the process of developing a new global headquarters and manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania in order to accommodate our projected demand for the Unifill syringe. We purchased a tract of land on which we intend to develop our own custom-built facility in conjunction with Keystone Redevelopment Group LLC, or Keystone, a Pennsylvania-based real estate company specialising in large scale redevelopment and complex economic development projects. The following paragraphs summarize the key aspects of the proposed development of the new facility.

Acquisition of Property

We, through Unilife Cross Farm, LLC, or Unilife CF, our newly formed subsidiary, acquired a 38 acre block of land in York County, Pennsylvania from Greenspring Partners, LP on November 16, 2009 for a purchase price of $2.0 million for the purposes of developing the new facility. The site is located approximately 9.5 miles from our current premises in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania.

Development Agreement

On December 14, 2009, Unilife CF entered into a development agreement with Keystone to develop the newly acquired property by constructing an approximately 165,000 square foot office, manufacturing, warehousing and distribution facility to our specifications. The new facility is initially intended to accommodate Unifill automated assembly lines with a combined annual capacity of 360 million units per year, as well as the Unitract 1mL automated assembly line and other contract manufacturing systems currently situated at our Lewisberry facility. The new facility will also include a 54,000 square foot office section that will function as our global headquarters and support administrative, marketing, new product development, quality laboratories and other operational functions.

The new facility has been designed to allow for an additional 100,000 square feet of contiguous production space to be constructed when required at a later date by us. Upon this additional expansion occurring, it will provide us with the space required to produce up to one billion syringes annually via the installation of additional Unifill assembly lines. Although this additional expansion of the new facility forms part of the current planning approvals that have been received by us, it is not part of the current development activity nor is it covered or included in the contracts referred to in the development, construction and design agreements described herein.

Unilife CF has appointed Keystone to provide services under the development agreement including, but not limited to:

•

assisting in the selection, review and management of architects, engineers, designers, contractors and other experts and consultants engaged to assist in the development of the new facility;

•

assisting Unilife CF in obtaining financing for the development of the new facility;

•

monitoring all development and construction work undertaken in connection with the development of the new facility; and

•

assisting in obtaining all necessary approvals, licenses, permits, certificates and authorisations from all governmental authorities that are required for the new facility.

Unilife CF has agreed to pay Keystone $0.8 million as the development fee for the provision of these services, which is payable in the following tranches:

•

$50,000 was paid in connection with the execution of the development agreement;

•

$0.2 million will be paid to Keystone in six equal monthly installments commencing January 1, 2010 and ending on June 1, 2010;

•

$0.2 million will be paid to Keystone upon Unilife CF obtaining access to the new facility to install production equipment; and

•

$0.3 million will be paid to Keystone on the issue of the certificate of occupancy evidencing permission to commence general occupancy of the new facility and compliance with all applicable building codes affecting the new facility.

Construction Agreement

On December 14, 2009, Unilife CF entered into a Construction Agreement with HSC Builders & Construction Managers (HSC) of Pennsylvania, to construct the new facility. HSC is a Pennsylvania-based company that specialises in building custom-designed facilities for biotech, academic, healthcare, pharmaceutical and technology companies.

HSC has been engaged by Unilife CF under the construction agreement as the construction manager and constructor of the new facility. Under the construction agreement, Unilife CF is required to pay for the cost of construction (as defined in the construction agreement) estimated to be approximately $21.4 million (Cost of Work), together with HSC’s fee, subject to a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) as described below.

HSC’s fee for constructing the new facility will be an amount equal to 1.25% of the Cost of Work (which is approximately $0.3 million (HSC Fee) assuming the Cost of Work is $21.4 million). The GMP has been established at $21,700,000 (comprising HSC’s Fee and the Cost of Work). Except for certain items beyond the control of Unilife CF or HSC, or items changed at the option of Unilife CF, any construction costs which exceed the GMP will be the responsibility and liability of HSC.

In the event that the final actual construction costs are less than the GMP, such savings will be shared between Unilife CF and HSC on an 85% / 15% basis.

Unilife CF has also agreed under the construction agreement to pay HSC a performance bonus of 15% of the HSC Fee if it achieves Phase 1 (see below) of the construction by April 15, 2010 and another 15% bonus of the HSC Fee if it achieves Phase 2 (see below) of the construction by December 10, 2010.

The fees payable to HSC and the Cost of Work as set out above, have been accounted for in the US$26 million budget for the development of the new facility (as detailed below).

The projected timetable for the construction of the new facility to be undertaken by HSC is as follows:


Date		Activity
By the end of June 2010		Completion of utility rooms for equipment installation
By the end of October 2010		Completion of clean rooms for equipment installation (Phase 1)
By the end of October 2010		Temporary occupancy permit for manufacturing/warehouse
By the end of December 2010		Unrestricted occupancy permit for manufacturing/warehouse (Phase 2)
By the end of December 2010		Unrestricted occupancy permit for office

Design Agreement

In connection with the development of the new facility, we retained L2 Architecture, or L2, to provide architectural design and structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services for the new facility. L2 is a Philadelphia-based architectural and engineering design firm that specializes in the pharmaceutical and medical device sector.

The design created by L2 incorporates the latest innovations in personnel and material flow dynamics with the intention of maximising the industrial productivity of the site while ensuring compliance with the highest standards of good manufacturing practice.

L2’s fee for the architectural services it will be providing to us in respect of the project will be $1.56 million. In the event that additional services are required beyond the contracted services agreed between us and L2, we will be required to pay L2 for such services on an hourly basis. The fees payable to L2 have been accounted for in the budget for the development of the new facility (as detailed below).

Proposed Financing of the Development

We have prepared a detailed budget for developing the new facility and based on this budget the total cost is estimated to be approximately $26.0 million. This includes the projected construction costs, the projected manufacturing facility fit out costs and the fees payable to Keystone, HSC and L2.

We have provided for $8.0 million — $10.0 million in projected capital expenditure to be used towards the development of the new facility. At this stage, we intend to fund up to approximately $9.0 million of the development costs for the new facility out of our existing cash reserves, which includes amounts received in connection with our October and November 2009 equity financings and will seek external financing for up to approximately $17.0 million from a commercial bank or other lending institution in the US and/or from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or other federal and state bodies.

Under the development agreement, Keystone is required to assist Unilife CF in obtaining external finance, on terms that are satisfactory to Unilife CF, for $18.0 million (or less if that amount is not required). In the event that Keystone is unable to assist Unilife CF in obtaining commitments for the required financing on or before December 31, 2009, Unilife CF may terminate the development agreement without any further obligation to Keystone unless negotiations with lenders (satisfactory to Unilife CF) are ongoing as at that date in which case the deadline will be extended during the period of such negotiations. Unilife CF’s right to terminate the development agreement will expire in the event that the full financing commitments are obtained as a result of such negotiations. The development agreement will otherwise terminate on the issue of the certificate of occupancy evidencing permission to commence general occupancy of the new facility and compliance with all applicable building codes affecting the new facility. In the event that Keystone is unable to meet its commitments, we believe that we can secure an alternative development partner.

We are currently in discussions with a number of banks, government agencies and other interested parties with respect to the required financing for the project.

Sale of Minority Interest in Unilife Cross Farm LLC

In connection with the development of the new facility, Unilife CF has agreed to issue to a subsidiary of Keystone, Cross Farm, LLC, a 1% interest in Unilife CF for $90,000 and Unilife Corporation has entered into an operating agreement with Cross Farm LLC with respect to the operation and management of Unilife CF as the development company for the new facility.

Unilife CF has retained a call option over the minority interest which it can exercise at any time during the first five years after completion of the sale of the minority interest for a purchase price prescribed under the agreement. However, if certain events occur such as the sale of the new facility, a change of control of the Unilife entities (excluding pursuant to the proposed redomiciliation transaction) or a breach by Unilife CF of the terms of the development agreement, the call option will be accelerated and the minority interest must be repurchased by Unilife CF at the prescribed price upon such events occurring.


Item 4.		Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information regarding ownership of our common stock as of September 30, 2009 by (i) each person, or group of affiliated persons who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group. All of this information gives effect to the redomiciliation and the share consolidation effected in connection therewith.

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. The beneficial ownership percentages set forth below are based on 37,010,802 shares of common stock outstanding on September 30, 2009. All shares of common stock owned by such person, including shares of common stock underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after September 30, 2009 (all of which we refer to as being currently exercisable) are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by that person for the purpose of computing the ownership percentage of that person, but are not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, each person listed in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown to be beneficially owned by such person, except to the extent that applicable law gives spouses shared authority.


	Number of Shares			Percentage of Shares
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Beneficially Owned			Beneficially Owned
Directors and Named Executive Officers (1)
Jim Bosnjak		494,000	(2)		1.3	%
Alan Shortall		2,992,296	(3)		8.1	%
John Lund		16,667			*
William Galle		33,333	(4)		*
Jeff Carter		472,345	(5)		1.3	%
Daniel Calvert		83,333	(6)		*
Eugene Shortall		125,000	(7)		*
Bernhard Opitz		83,998	(8)		*
Stephen Allan		144,892	(9)		*
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)		4,513,197			12.2	%


*		Indicates less than 1%

(1)		The address of each director and executive officer listed above is c/o Unilife Corporation, 633 Lowther Road, Lewisberry, Pennsylvania 17339.

(2)		Includes options to purchase 166,667 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 166,667 shares of common stock which are not currently exercisable.



(3)		Includes (i) 1,666,667 shares of common stock subject to certain transfer restrictions set forth in Mr. Shortall’s employment agreement dated October 26, 2008 and (ii) options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock which are not currently exercisable.


(4)		Represents options to purchase 33,333 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 58,333 shares of common stock which are not currently exercisable.

(5)		Includes options to purchase 416,667 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable.

(6)		Represents options to purchase 83,333 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 166,667 shares of common stock which are not currently exercisable.

(7)		Represents options to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable.

(8)		Includes options to purchase 83,333 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 166,667 shares of common stock which are not currently exercisable.

(9)		Includes options to purchase 142,500 shares of common stock which are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 116,667 shares of common stock which are not currently exercisable.


Item 5.		Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our directors and executive officers.


Name	Age		Position
Jim Bosnjak		60	Chairman and Director
Alan Shortall		55	Director and Chief Executive Officer
John Lund		44	Director
William Galle		70	Director
Jeff Carter		51	Director
Daniel Calvert		55	Chief Financial Officer
Eugene Shortall		58	Senior Vice President of RTFS
Bernhard Opitz		52	Senior Vice President of Operations
Mark Iampietro		56	Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs
Stephen Allan		35	Vice President of Marketing and Communications

Biographical Summaries

Jim Bosnjak. Mr. Bosnjak has served as a director of UMSL since February 2003 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009 and as Chairman of the board of UMSL since April 2006 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. Mr. Bosnjak has been a co-owner and director of the Le Meridian Lav Hotel in Split, Croatia since 2002 and is chairman and co-founder of Ultimate Outdoor Ltd., an Australian outdoor advertising company. Mr. Bosnjak was a director of Westbus Pty Ltd. from 1975 to 2001 and the chairman of Westbus Pty Ltd. between 1990 and 2001. He has also held positions on Commonwealth and New South Wales advisory bodies, including the Greater Western Sydney Economic Development Board, and the GROW Employment Council. Mr. Bosnjak also served as the Chairman of the Tourism Council of Australia and Bus 2000, which coordinated bus services for the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. Mr. Bosnjak holds an honorary doctorate from the University of Western Sydney for his services related employment growth and economic development.

Alan Shortall. Mr. Shortall has served as Chief Executive Officer and director of UMSL since September 2002 and of Unilife Corporation since July 2009. Mr. Shortall co-founded Unilife in July 2002 and has guided the growth of Unilife since then. In 2008, the trade magazine Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry named him as one of 100 Notable People in the medical device industry worldwide. Mr. Shortall is the brother of Eugene Shortall, our Senior Vice President of RTFS, our Unifill syringes.

John Lund. Mr. Lund has served as a director of UMSL and Unilife Corporation since November 2009. Mr. Lund also serves as managing partner of M&A Holdings, LLC, a private consulting company since July 2003, and as Vice President Finance and Controller of E-rewards, Inc., an internet market research company since February 2009. Mr. Lund also served as Vice President and Controller of Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., a NASDAQ listed television broadcasting company, from March 2008 to November 2008, Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller of LQ Management, LLC (LaQuinta) from November 2006 to March 2008, and Corporate Controller of ExcellerateHRO from January 2005 to October 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Lund held Controller and Chief Financial Officer positions for various companies, and was a Manager at KPMG.

William Galle. Mr. Galle has served as a director of UMSL since June 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. Mr. Galle has also been the managing director of American Marketing Complex in New York City since October 2007 and president of Diversified Portfolio Strategies LLC in Washington D.C. since 1993, which provides alternative investment advisory services for institutions and substantial investors. Mr. Galle is a graduate of Columbia University, Rutgers University, and the New York Institute of Finance.

Jeff Carter. Mr. Carter has served as a director of UMSL since April 2006 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. From February 2005 until December 2008, Mr. Carter served as Chief Financial Officer of UMSL. He has also served as Company Secretary since March 2007. From March 2003 to November 2004, Mr. Carter was the chief financial officer and company secretary of the former Ambri Ltd (currently Diversa Ltd.), a public company in Australia. Mr. Carter is a chartered accountant and holds a master’s degree in applied finance from Macquarie University of Sydney.

Daniel Calvert. Mr. Calvert has served as Chief Financial Officer of UMSL since December 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since our incorporation in July 2009. From September 2006 to November 2008, Mr. Calvert served as executive vice president and chief accounting officer of Standard Management Corporation, a company quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. From May 2004 to March 2006, he was the chief financial officer of MBT International, a division of a publicly held company. Mr. Calvert is a certified management accountant, holds a Master of Business Administration in finance from Michigan State University and a Master of Science degree in taxation from the University of Baltimore.

Eugene Shortall. Mr. Shortall has served as Senior Vice President of RTFS of UMSL since February 2009 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. From October 2007 to February 2009 he served as our RTFS Project Director. From June 2003 to October 2007, Mr. Shortall was a consultant for the Public Institute for Social Security in Kuwait and was previously employed as a consultant for Behbehani National Construction. Mr. Shortall is the brother of Alan Shortall, our Chief Executive Officer and director.

Bernhard Opitz. Mr. Opitz has served as Senior Vice President of Operations of UMSL since December 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. From August 2007 to June 2008, Mr. Opitz served as Vice President — Manufacturing at Nanosphere, Inc., a Nanotechnology-based molecular diagnostics company. From December 2002 to July 2006, he was the Vice President - Engineering/Operations at Wells’ Dairy, Inc., a large manufacturer of ice cream. From September 2000 to April 2002, he was Senior Vice President of Operations at Ikonisys Inc., a cell-based diagnostics company. From 1980 to 2000, Mr. Opitz also held various positions at Bayer AG including project engineer, manager of plant engineering, manager of engineering, production manager, vice president of operations, and senior vice president of engineering. Mr. Opitz holds a Master of Science degree in mechanical/process engineering from Technical University Graz in Austria.

Mark Iampietro. Mr. Iampietro has served as Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs of UMSL since October 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. From May 2002 to July 2008, Mr. Iampietro was Vice President of Quality, Regulatory and Clinical Operations at Spherics, Inc., a pharmaceutical manufacturer, where he managed various phases of quality, regulatory, and clinical programs. Mr. Iampietro holds American Society for Quality certifications as both a quality and reliability engineer and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in life sciences with a minor in engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Stephen Allan. Mr. Allan has served as Vice President of Marketing and Communications of UMSL since October 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. He served as our Director of Communications from November 2007 to October 2008 and our Manager of Communications from July 2002 to November 2007. Prior to joining Unilife, Mr. Allan owned and operated his own Australian public relations firm, which assisted in the management of media relations and government liaison for industry groups in the transport, tourism and economic development sectors. He managed media liaison activities relating to bus transportation during the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. He also spent five years as a journalist for various Sydney-based newspaper groups. Mr. Allan holds a Bachelor of Communications from Charles Sturt University.


Item 6.		Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation philosophy for those individuals who were our most highly compensated executives based on their fiscal 2009 compensation. These executives are referred to herein as “named executives”. Where applicable, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis also describes the ways in which we anticipate that our compensation philosophy may change after we become a U.S.-based public company.

During 2008, in anticipation of the relocation of our headquarters and principal operations from Australia to the United States, the board of directors granted Alan Shortall, our Chief Executive Officer, broad discretion to hire a new U.S.-based executive management team and to set the initial terms of their employment. In furtherance of this mandate, during fiscal 2009 Mr. Shortall assembled a new management team whose members joined us at various times during calendar year 2008 and 2009. In addition, Mr. Shortall, together with Stephen Allan, who had been with us since 2002, relocated to the United States in early 2009.

Our named executives are:

•

Alan Shortall, who is our Chief Executive Officer;

•

Jeff Carter, who was our Chief Financial Officer until December 2008;

•

Daniel Calvert, who became our Chief Financial Officer in December 2008;

•

Eugene Shortall, who became our Senior Vice President, RTFS in February 2009;

•

Bernhard Opitz, who became our Senior Vice President of Operations in December 2008; and

•

Stephen Allan, who became our Vice President of Marketing and Communications in October 2008.

During the process of assembling the new executive management team, our Chief Executive Officer negotiated on an arm’s length basis with each of our new named executives with respect to the terms of his compensation package and, in the case of Mr. Allan, the terms of his compensation package upon relocating to the United States. In each case, Mr. Shortall considered the individual’s prior relevant experience and compensation levels, as well as his prospective roles and responsibilities with our Company. Due in part to the necessity of assembling an entirely new team in a short amount of time, Mr. Shortall did not conduct a formal survey of compensation paid by other companies, but rather conducted these negotiations using his best judgment of what would constitute an appropriate compensation package. After reaching agreement with the prospective named executives, Mr. Shortall presented the compensation packages to the board of directors which agreed to the terms. The terms of the compensation packages were ultimately memorialized in agreements which we describe below under — “Employment Offer Letters, Employment Agreements and Consultancy Agreements.”

Historically, we did not have a separate compensation committee of the board of directors. Determinations regarding the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers and non-employee directors were made by the entire board of directors. Under ASX listing rules, board compensation and stock incentive compensation for executives is put to a vote of shareholders. After we become a Nasdaq-listed company, we will continue to be subject to these rules so long as we remain listed on the ASX. In preparation for our Nasdaq listing, we recently established a compensation committee which will consider and approve executive compensation as required by Nasdaq rules.

Objectives of the Compensation Program

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to deliver a competitive package to attract, motivate and retain key executives and align their compensation with our overall business goals, core values and shareholder interests. To this end, our board of directors followed an executive compensation philosophy that included the following considerations:

•

a “pay-for-performance” orientation that delivers pay based on company and individual performance;

•

long-term incentives, including stock-based awards, to more closely align the interests of executives and shareholders; and

•

individual wealth accumulation through long-term incentives, rather than through pensions.

We expect that our compensation committee will establish a similar executive compensation philosophy with respect to our named executives following redomiciliation. We expect that our primary compensation objectives will be to reinforce consistent attainment of Unilife’s key strategic goals and to retain the executive talent we have hired.

The Design of the Compensation Program

Compensation for our named executives has included the following elements:

•

base salary;

•

annual cash incentives and discretionary bonuses;

•

long-term incentives in the form of stock options and stock awards; and

•

other benefits and perquisites.

We expect that our executive compensation program will continue to include these elements going forward following our redomiciliation. In addition, we expect our future compensation program to include grants of restricted stock which we could not issue as an Australian company. When making compensation-related decisions, we believe it is important to be informed about the current practices of similarly situated public companies. For this purpose, the board of directors has retained a compensation consulting firm, Strategic Apex Group LLC, or Strategic Apex, to assist our compensation committee in developing an appropriate comparator group for benchmarking. We currently expect that this comparator group will consist of companies in the medical device industry as well as companies in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. We also expect that Strategic Apex will assist the compensation committee in developing performance metrics and long-term incentives for the named executives to ensure that key strategic goals are met and that the interests of key decision makers and shareholders are aligned. The goals of our compensation program for our named executives are to provide total direct compensation that is appropriate for an organization of our size and stage of development and that will support continued recruitment of top talent and retention of the executive team we have built over the last 18 months, as well as to reward achievement of key strategic goals and to align executive compensation with shareholder interests. We expect to evaluate individual performance in determining increases to base salary and awarding annual incentive compensation and future equity grants. We will also consider employment agreement terms and internal pay equity within the executive team. When considering internal pay equity, we will consider the reported market rate for these positions and total direct compensation of other executives who have a similar level of responsibility at the Company.

Elements of Compensation

Base Salary

Base salary is an important element of compensation because it provides the named executives with a base level of income. Our board of directors negotiated the base salary of our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the employment agreement that we entered into with him in October 2008. Our board of directors set our Chief Executive Officer’s base salary at a level that the board believed was commensurate with our Chief Executive Officer’s skills, knowledge and duties. As described above, the initial base salary of each named executive (other than our Chief Executive Officer) was negotiated by our Chief Executive Officer with such executive during the hiring process of Messrs. Calvert and Opitz and, in the case of Eugene Shortall and Mr. Allan, in connection with their relocation to the United States.

Our compensation committee will determine whether and when to adjust the base salaries of the named executives in the future. We expect that our compensation committee will consider each executive’s performance and level of responsibility and market data for similar positions.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

Our Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash incentive award is a discretionary award up to a maximum amount provided for in his employment agreement. The amount of this award is determined by our board of directors based on satisfaction of key performance indicators, or KPIs, determined by our board of directors. Going forward, our compensation committee will set the KPIs of our Chief Executive Officer, review his performance and determine the amount of any annual incentive compensation earned by him.

As more fully described in the footnotes to the grants of plan-based awards table, each of Messrs. Calvert and Opitz were entitled pursuant to the terms of his employment offer letter to receive a cash incentive award, for calendar year 2009, and for the portion of calendar year 2008 during which he was employed with us, at the target level specified in his employment offer letter, if his performance satisfies certain KPIs. Our Chief Executive Officer establishes the KPIs for each named executive which are tailored to the named executive’s individual area of responsibility and key strategic goals. Our Chief Executive Officer has broad discretion in interpreting the KPIs and determining the extent to which a particular KPI has been met. In the case of fiscal 2009, the KPIs were established and communicated at various points during the course of the year, as each named executive was hired on a different date. In the future, we expect that KPIs will be established and communicated during the first or second quarter of the applicable performance period.

In respect of fiscal 2009, the following is a summary description of the KPIs for each named executive:

•

Alan Shortall - relocation of our corporate headquarters to Lewisberry, Pennsylvania; signing the industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis; initiation of production of the Unitract 1mL syringe in our FDA registered facility in Lewisberry; and implementation of a new quality system.

•

Jeff Carter—transition of finance and accounting functions to U.S.-based personnel and undertaking corporate secretarial and ASX reporting requirements

•

Dan Calvert—management of our financial affairs and the development of business plan models and corporate strategy

•

Eugene Shortall—management of the ready-to-fill syringe project and completion of key project milestones

•

Bernhard Opitz—expansion of our operational, engineering and production personnel

•

Stephen Allan—management of our marketing and communications activities

Our board of directors and Chief Executive Officer determined that each of the named executives satisfied their KPIs. Consequently, the named executives received incentive compensation payments at their target levels for fiscal 2009 as reflected in the summary compensation table and grants of plan-based awards table below.

In addition to the incentive compensation awards, we may also provide discretionary cash bonuses to our named executives to reward them for their contribution toward the achievement of significant milestones of the Company. For fiscal 2009, our board of directors decided to pay a discretionary bonus of A$150,000 to our Chief Executive Officer in recognition of his efforts in securing the exclusive licensing agreement with sanofi-aventis in June 2008 and the industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis in June 2009. Securing these two agreements were important milestones in our long-term business plan.

Commencing in calendar 2010, we expect to adopt an annual incentive plan with terms to be determined by our compensation committee. We expect that our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with our compensation committee, will establish KPIs that represent key strategic objectives relating to the industrialization of the ready-to-fill syringe, the commercial production and sale of our 1 mL syringe, the further development of a world-class organization and additional products, and building shareholder value. In accordance with our compensation committee’s charter, our compensation committee will evaluate the performance of each named executive in light of his KPIs and will determine the amount of any annual incentive compensation earned by the named executive based on such evaluation.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Our long-term incentive compensation has historically been in the form of grants of stock options and stock awards under our Employee Share Option Plan, or ESOP. These grants were designed to provide our executives with multiple awards over a number of years to encourage alignment with shareholder interests and to retain highly valued employees. The ESOP was approved by the shareholders of UMSL in 2007. Our board of directors historically has reviewed the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and determined the equity awards to be granted to him subject to shareholder approval pursuant to Australian law and ASX listing rules. Our Chief Executive Officer historically has reviewed the performance of the other named executives and recommended the equity awards to be granted to them for approval by our board of directors.

We view stock options as an important element of performance-based compensation because a stock option provides no realizable value to a recipient until the vesting requirements have been met and will increase in value only as the trading price of our shares increases. Vesting periods are intended to require a long-term focus on overall Company performance for the executive to realize any value from the exercise of options.

In fiscal 2009, we granted stock options to our named executives as reflected in the grants of plan-based awards table. These stock option grants were made in fulfillment of the terms of each named executive’s respective offer letter or employment agreement. The amount of each stock option grant for the named executives other than our Chief Executive Officer was determined by our Chief Executive Officer in his best judgment during arms’ length negotiation of the employment offer and approved by our board of directors.

In fiscal 2009, we granted stock options and a stock award to our Chief Executive Officer in fulfillment of the terms of his employment agreement. The size and nature of these grants were negotiated at arms’ length by our board of directors and Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer received a stock award in addition to stock options to more fully align his interests with those of our shareholders insofar as under the stock award, our Chief Executive Officer will share in the downside risk and realize an economic loss if our share price declines. As more fully described under —“Guidelines for Share Ownership and Holding Periods for Equity Awards,” restrictions have been placed on our Chief Executive Officer’s right to dispose of the shares received under his stock award.

Tax Matters

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that certain publicly held corporations may deduct for U.S. federal tax purposes in any one year with respect to certain named executives. This limitation did not apply to us for fiscal 2009 because, as of June 30, 2009, none of our shares were required to be registered under the Exchange Act.

It is expected that Section 162(m) of the Code will apply to us following the re-domiciliation and that our compensation committee will adopt a general practice of considering the adverse effect of Section 162(m) of the Code on the deductibility of compensation when designing annual and long-term compensation programs and approving payouts under these programs. While the tax treatment of compensation is important, the primary factor influencing program design is the support of business objectives. Consequently, it is expected that our compensation committee will reserve the right to design and administer the programs in a manner that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and to approve the payment of nondeductible compensation if the compensation committee believes doing so may achieve a result determined to be in Unilife’s best interest. Due to transition rules that apply to UMSL under Section 162(m) of the Code, we believe that all of the compensation that will result when our named executives exercise their currently outstanding stock options should be fully deductible.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our compensation committee is composed of three independent directors, namely Jim Bosnjak, John Lund and William Galle. None of the members of the compensation committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of Unilife, UMSL or any of its subsidiaries, or has any relationship with Unilife, UMSL or its executives, other than their directorship and equity interests in UMSL as disclosed in “Item 4. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” of this registration statement. During its fiscal 2009, no executive officer of UMSL or Unilife Corporation served on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that had any executive officer who also served on the compensation committee or board of directors of UMSL or Unilife Corporation.

Compensation of Named Executive Officers

The following table provides information regarding total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executives.


Summary Compensation Table
											Non-Equity		Nonqualified Deferred
							Stock		Option		Incentive Plan		Compensation		All Other
			Salary		Bonus		Awards ($)		Awards		Compensation		Earnings		Compensation			Total
Name and Position	Year		($)		($)		(1)		($) (2)		($) (3)		($) (4)		($)			($)

Alan Shortall (5)
Chief Executive Officer		2009		321,991		144,540		1,810,800		384,035		166,908		—		142,035	(6)		2,970,309
Jeff Carter (7)
Former Chief Financial Officer		2009		185,134		79,497		—		47,850		24,090		10,491		198,463	(8)		545,525
Daniel Calvert (9)
Chief Financial Officer		2009		86,154		—		—		90,186		37,333		—		7,722	(10)		221,395
Eugene Shortall (11)
Senior Vice President of RTFS		2009		185,760		—		—		48,571		41,941		—		8,225	(12)		284,497
Bernhard Opitz (13)
Senior Vice President of Operations		2009		121,154		—		—		90,186		36,750		—		22,374	(14)		270,464
Stephen Allan (15)
Vice President of Marketing and Communications		2009		117,595		48,180		—		68,864		—		10,226		72,337	(16)		317,202


(1)		All restricted stock grants are issued with fair values determined in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the exchange rate at June 30, 2009 of A$1.00 = US$0.8048. The amount referenced is equal to the weighted-average grant date fair value recognized during the year ended June 30, 2009.


(2)		All option awards are issued with an exercise price in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the exchange rate at June 30, 2009 of A$1.00 = US$0.8048. The amount referenced is calculated using the Black-Scholes and Barrier pricing models. See Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this registration statement.


(3)		Represents amounts paid as incentive compensation under the terms of the named executive’s employment offer letter or employment agreement.



(4)		Statutory payments for superannuation (i.e., pension fund) equal to 9% of annual salary. This applies only to Australian employees.



(5)		Prior to his relocation from Australia to the United States in February and until April 2009, Mr. Shortall had been receiving his cash compensation in Australian dollars, which, for purposes of this summary compensation table, were converted into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate during the applicable period.



(6)		Includes a payment of $100,000 for relocation expenses as well as $32,582 related to the purchase of an automobile. Also includes A$9,453 related to parking and telephone costs.



(7)		Mr. Carter has been receiving his cash compensation in Australian dollars, which, for the purposes of this summary compensation table, were converted into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate during the applicable period.



(8)		Includes $176,015 related to severance payments, as well as $12,213 related to the purchase of an automobile and $10,235 related to parking and other costs.



(9)		Mr. Calvert has served as our Chief Financial Officer since December 2008. The amounts disclosed in the table above reflect amounts earned from December 2008 to June 2009.



(10)		Represents amounts in connection with the rental of an apartment.



(11)		Mr. Shortall has been receiving his cash compensation primarily in Australian dollars, which, for purposes of this summary compensation table, were converted into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate during the applicable period.



(12)		Represents amounts related to the rental of an office and residence.



(13)		Mr. Opitz has served as our Senior Vice President of Operations since December 2008. The amounts disclosed in the table above reflect amounts earned from December 2008 to June 2009.



(14)		Includes $19,657 in connection with the rental of an apartment and $2,717 in costs related to relocation.



(15)		Prior to his relocation from Australia to the United States in December 2008, Mr. Allan had been receiving his cash compensation in Australian dollars, which, for purposes of this summary compensation table, were converted into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate during the applicable period.



(16)		Includes $60,000 related to relocation, as well as $12,337 related to the purchase of an automobile and rental of an apartment.

Employment Offer Letters, Employment Agreements and Consultancy Agreements

We have used employment offer letters, employment agreements and consultancy agreements to set the initial compensation terms for our named executives. As described above, the employment offer letters with our named executives other than our Chief Executive Officer were negotiated by our Chief Executive Officer at arms’ length when he assembled the company’s senior management team. Below is a summary of the employment offer letters and employment agreements in effect with our named executives during fiscal 2009. Additional information regarding potential payments upon termination of employment pursuant to the terms of the employment offer letters and employment agreements is set forth under —“Potential Payments Upon Termination and Changes of Control.”

Alan Shortall, Chief Executive Officer

As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Shortall reports to our board of directors. He is responsible for the executive management team and has responsibility for the effective leadership and business development of the Company. The key elements of Mr. Shortall’s employment agreement are as follows:

•

Annual salary of $420,000, subject to annual review.

•

Incentive compensation awards per fiscal year of up to $200,000, subject to satisfaction of KPIs, to be determined by our board of directors.

•

A grant of 1,666,667 shares of stock and 1,250,000 options.

•

The employment agreement has a term of three years commencing on July 1, 2008.

•

The employment agreement may be terminated by, among other ways, one party giving the other three months’ prior written notice (or by us paying Mr. Shortall three months of his total annual salary in lieu of the written notice).

•

After the termination of Mr Shortall’s employment with us, he may not be involved in any business which is a competitor of the Company’s, or entice away any employee, customer or supplier of the Company for up to 24 months worldwide (or for such shorter period and geographical area as a court may decide).

Mr. Shortall’s base salary was paid in Australian dollars for the majority of fiscal 2009. In April 2009, after he relocated to the United States, he began receiving payment of his base salary in United States dollars. At the time of this change, the values of the United States and Australian dollars were relatively equivalent but the exchange rate began to diverge later in the year, accounting for the differential between the agreement rate and the amount reported in the summary compensation table.

Our board of directors determined that Mr. Shortall met his KPIs to receive full payment of his incentive compensation award. In addition, in recognition of the crucial role that Mr. Shortall played in obtaining the sanofi-aventis exclusive licensing agreement on June 30, 2008, which represented a significant milestone for the company, and the industrialization agreement with sanofi-aventis on June 30, 2009, which was the second critical step in the sanofi-aventis relationship, our board of directors awarded Mr. Shortall a discretionary bonus payment of A$150,000 for fiscal 2009.

Jeff Carter, Former Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Carter served as our Chief Financial Officer from February 2005 until December 2008. As our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Carter was responsible for all financial aspects of the Company, including financial reporting, statutory reporting, taxation and secretarial functions. In December 2008, Mr. Calvert replaced Mr. Carter as our Chief Financial Officer.

The key elements of compensation for Mr. Carter while he served as our Chief Financial Officer during fiscal 2009 were as follows:

•

Annual salary of A$200,000, subject to annual review.

•

Incentive compensation awards in respect of each financial year of up to A$25,000, as determined at the discretion of our Chief Executive Officer, subject to satisfaction of KPIs.

The employment offer letter with Mr. Opitz became effective on December 2, 2008, and did not have a specified term. The employment offer letter was superseded by an employment agreement effective November 10, 2009, which provides for the same cash compensation package and which is for an initial term expiring on December 31, 2012, subject to automatic renewal for successive one-year periods unless a non-renewal notice is given.

Our Chief Executive Officer determined that Mr. Opitz met his KPIs to receive full payment of his incentive compensation award for December 2008 and the six-month period ending June 30, 2009.

Stephen Allan, Vice President of Marketing and Communications

As Vice President of Marketing and Communications, Mr. Allan is responsible for the global marketing of our products and other communications functions. During fiscal 2009, we did not have a written employment agreement in place with Mr. Allan but the terms of his employment upon relocating to the United States were negotiated at arms’ length with our Chief Executive Officer. The key elements of compensation for Mr. Allan as in effect during fiscal 2009 are as follows:

•

Annual salary of $150,000, subject to annual review.

•

Incentive compensation awards in respect of each calendar year of up to 20 percent of base salary, subject to satisfaction of KPIs.

•

A one-time housing allowance of $60,000 for his relocation from Australia to the United States in January 2009.

Mr. Allan’s base salary was paid in Australian dollars for the first half of fiscal 2009. In January 2009, after he relocated to the United States, he began receiving payment of his base salary in United States dollars. At the time of this change, the values of the United States and Australian dollars were relatively equivalent but the exchange rate began to diverge later in the year, accounting for the differential between the agreement rate and the amount reported in the summary compensation table.

Our Chief Executive Officer determined that Mr. Allan met his KPIs to receive full payment of his incentive compensation awards for the six-month period ending December 31, 2008 and the six-month period ending June 30, 2009, the first of which was paid during fiscal 2009.

We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Allan effective on November 10, 2009 to memorialize the terms of his employment with us after his relocation to the United States. The employment agreement is for an initial term expiring on December 31, 2012, subject to automatic renewal for successive one-year periods unless a non-renewal notice is given.

The following table provides information regarding all option and stock awards made to our named executives during the year ended June 30, 2009:


Grants of Plan-Based Awards
For the year ended June 30, 2009 *
			Estimated
			Future Payouts					All Option
			Under Non-Equity			All Other Stock		Awards:				Grant Date
			Incentive Plan			Awards:		Number of		Exercise or		Fair Value of
			Awards			Number of		Securities		Base Price or		Stock and
			Target			Shares of Stock		Underlying		Option Awards		Option Awards
Name and Position	Grant Date		($)			or Units		Options		($) (1)		($)

Alan Shortall		11/28/08		—			1,666,667		—		—		1,810,800
Chief Executive Officer		11/28/08		—			—		1,250,000		1.62		1,408,400
Jeff Carter		—		—			—		—		—		—
Former Chief Financial Officer		—		—			—		—		—		—
Daniel Calvert		12/2/08		37,333	(2)		—		250,000		1.62		277,656
Chief Financial Officer		—		—			—		—		—		—
Eugene Shortall		—		41,941			—		—		—		—
Senior Vice President of RTFS		—		—			—		—		—		—
Bernhard Opitz		12/2/08		36,750	(3)		—		250,000		1.62		277,656
Senior Vice President of Operations		—		—			—		—		—		—
Stephen Allan		9/1/08		—	(4)		—		166,667		1.44		225,344
Vice President of Marketing and Communications		—		—			—		—		—		—


*		Includes only those columns relating to grants awarded to the named executives in fiscal 2009. All other columns have been omitted.



(1)		All stock option awards are issued with an exercise price in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the exchange rate at June 30, 2009 of A$1.00 = US$0.8048.

(2)		Mr. Calvert has served as our Chief Financial Officer since December 2008. Pursuant to Mr. Calvert’s employment agreement, he was eligible to receive, subject to satisfaction of specified KPIs, an incentive compensation payment, payable on June 30, 2009, of up to 3.33% of his base salary for his services performed in December 2008 and incentive compensation of up to 40% of his base salary for services performed during calendar year 2009, payable in two installments on June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The amounts reported in this grants of plan-based awards table are the target amounts that Mr. Calvert was eligible to receive during fiscal 2009.

(3)		Mr. Opitz has served as our Senior Vice President of Operations since December 2008. Pursuant to Mr. Opitz’s employment offer letter, he was eligible to receive, subject to satisfaction of specified KPIs, an incentive compensation payment, payable on June 30, 2009, of up to $5,250 for his services performed in December 2008 and incentive compensation of up to $63,000 for services performed during calendar year 2009, payable in two installments on June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The amounts reported in this grants of plan-based awards table are the target amounts that Mr. Opitz was eligible to receive during fiscal 2009.

(4)		Mr. Allan became our Vice President of Marketing and Communications in October 2008 and relocated to the United States in early 2009. Mr. Allan was eligible to receive, subject to satisfaction of specified KPIs, an incentive compensation payment of up to 20 percent of his base salary for calendar year 2009. [We pay incentive compensation in June and December of each calendar year. The amount reported in this grants of plan-based awards table is the target amount that Mr. Allan was eligible to receive during fiscal 2009.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, no options were exercised and no stock awards vested.

The following table provides information regarding all outstanding equity awards for our named executives as of June 30, 2009:

Outstanding Equity Awards

As of June 30, 2009*

Option Awards

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#

Option Exercise

Option

Name and Position

Exercisable)

Unexercisable)

Price ($) (1)

Expiration Date

Alan Shortall

Chief Executive Officer

—

1,250,000

1.62

09/30/13

Jeff Carter

Former Chief Financial Officer

333,333

83,333

1.20

12/31/10

Daniel Calvert

Chief Financial Officer

83,333

166,667

1.62

06/30/12

Eugene Shortall

Senior Vice President of RTFS

100,000

25,000

1.68

12/31/10

Bernhard Opitz

Senior Vice President of Operations

83,333

166,667

1.62

06/30/12

Stephen Allan

Vice President of Marketing and Communications

9,167

—

9.18

12/31/09

83,333

—

1.20

12/31/09

—

166,667

1.44

06/30/12



*		Includes only those columns which are applicable.

(1)		All option awards were issued with an exercise price in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the exchange rate at June 30, 2009 of A$1.00 = US$0.8048.

(2)		The market value of all stock awards is based upon the closing price of our common stock of A$0.31 on June 30, 2009 converted at the exchange rate on June 30, 2009 of A$1.00 = US$0.8048.

In connection with the redomiciliation transaction, we have adopted our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, which is subject to the approval by the shareholders of UMSL at a meeting scheduled for January 8, 2010. On November 20, 2009, our compensation committee approved a new incentive package for Mr. Alan Shortall, our Chief Executive Officer, which package includes the issuance of 1,166,000 shares of restricted stock and 834,000 options to purchase common stock under our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. The new incentive package is subject to the approval by the shareholders of UMSL at the meeting scheduled for January 8, 2010 and the share scheme of arrangement for the redomiciliation transaction becoming effective.

The shares of our restricted stock, if granted to Mr. Shortall, will be subject to vesting based on the achievement of the following performance milestones: 233,200 restricted shares will vest upon the signing of supply agreements with sanofi-aventis for 100 million or more Unifill syringes. 233,200 restricted shares will vest upon the signing of the first new agreement for the Unifill syringe with a pharmaceutical company other than sanofi-aventis or its affiliates. 233,200 restricted shares will vest upon the signing of an agreement with any pharmaceutical company, including sanofi-aventis, for a new product (other than the Unifill syringe). 233,200 restricted shares will vest upon the installation of the first Unifill syringe production line into a clean room in our new facility, including the successful operation qualification of the line. 233,200 restricted shares will vest upon the first shipment of production quality sterile Unifill syringes to sanofi-aventis from a commercial production line.

The options to purchase our common stock, if granted to Mr. Shortall, will have an exercise price equal to six times the closing price on ASX of our CDI’s (each CDI representing one-sixth of one share of our common stock) on the date of grant and will be exercisable for five years from the date of grant. The options will vest as follows: 250,000 options will vest upon our share price reaching $9.45 or more for a minimum of 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days, 250,000 options will vest upon our share price reaching $12.15 or more for a minimum of 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days and 334,000 options will vest upon our share price reaching $17.82 or more for a minimum of 20 out of any 30 consecutive trading days.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Changes in Control

We have entered into employment and consulting agreements with our named executives. Below is a summary of the material termination and change in control provisions.

Jeff Carter, Former Chief Financial Officer

During January 2009, we made Mr. Carter redundant as our Chief Financial Officer and paid him severance in the amount of A$180,000, which was equal to nine months of his annual salary. Mr. Carter has remained on our board of directors and as our Company Secretary and as a consultant. We have entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Carter, under which Mr. Carter receives a minimum compensation of A$20,000 per month for his consulting services.

Daniel Calvert, Chief Financial Officer

We entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Calvert in November 2008 that was superseded by an employment agreement entered into in November 2009. Mr. Calvert’s employment offer letter, which was in effect on June 30, 2009, entitled him to receive severance consisting of six months of his annual salary if we terminated his employment other than for cause or inability to perform his duties.

Under Mr. Calvert’s current employment agreement, if we terminate Mr. Calvert’s employment without cause or elect not to renew the employment agreement, he will receive severance consisting of six months of his annual salary and payment for the cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for six months. Certain non-competition obligations, as specified in the employment agreement, apply to Mr. Calvert during his employment and for two years thereafter. Assuming Mr. Calvert’s current employment agreement was in effect as of June 30, 2009, and his employment was terminated without cause on that date, he would have been entitled to receive severance totaling $83,762, consisting of $80,000 (six months of his annual salary) and $3,762 (cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for six months).

In the event that Mr. Calvert’s employment is terminated coincident with or following a change in control of Unilife, then, in lieu of the severance described immediately above, Mr. Calvert is entitled to (i) 18 months of his annual salary, (ii) payment for the cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for 18 months, (iii) payment of an amount equal to the bonus, if any, earned by and paid to him for the prior completed fiscal year, and (iv) all of his outstanding options vesting immediately upon such termination. Assuming Mr. Calvert’s employment was so terminated as of June 30, 2009, and his current employment agreement was in effect as of that date, he would have been entitled to receive severance totaling $288,620, consisting of (i) $240,000 (18 months of his annual salary), (ii) $11,287 (cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for 18 months), and (iii) $37,333 (the bonus paid to him for the prior completed fiscal year). In addition, 166,667 unvested options would have vested.

We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Allan in November 2009. Under the terms of the employment agreement, if we terminate Mr. Allan’s employment without cause or elect not to renew the employment agreement, he will receive severance consisting of six months of his annual salary and payment for the cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for six months. Certain non-competition obligations, as specified in the employment agreement, apply to Mr. Allan during his employment and for two years thereafter. Assuming Mr. Allan’s employment agreement was in effect as of June 30, 2009, and his employment was terminated without cause on that date, he would have been entitled to receive severance totaling $80,896, consisting of $75,000 (six months of his annual salary) and $5,896 (cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for six months).

In the event that Mr. Allan’s employment is terminated coincident with or following a change in control of Unilife, then, in lieu of the severance described immediately above, Mr. Allan is entitled to (i) 18 months of his annual salary, (ii) payment for the cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for 18 months, (iii) payment of an amount equal to the bonus, if any, earned by and paid to him for the prior completed fiscal year, and (iv) all of his outstanding options vesting immediately upon such termination. Assuming Mr. Allan’s employment was so terminated as of June 30, 2009, and his employment agreement was in effect as of that date, he would have been entitled to receive severance totaling $290,868, consisting of (i) $225,000 (18 months of his annual salary), (ii) $17,688 (cost of his COBRA health care contribution coverage for 18 months), and (iii) $48,180 (the bonus paid to him for the prior completed fiscal year). In addition 116,667 unvested options would have vested. We also have an obligation to pay for the relocation of Mr. Allan and his dependants back to Australia, including moving his personal and household effects, at the end of his employment with Unilife in the United States.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation that UMSL paid or awarded to its non-employee directors during the year ended June 30, 2009. Directors of UMSL who are also employees do not receive compensation for their services as directors.


Director Compensation
	Fees Earned							Nonqualified
	or Paid in			Stock		Option		Deferred		All Other
	Cash			Awards		Awards		Compensation		Compensation		Total
Name	($)			($)		($) (1)		Earnings($)(2)		($)		($)

Jim Bosnjak		89,764	(3)		—		66,365		8,079		—		164,208

William Galle		52,500			—		43,986		—		—		96,486

Jeff Carter		13,626	(4)		—				1,458		—		15,084


(1)		All option awards were issued with an exercise price in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the exchange rate at June 30, 2009 of A$1.00 = US$0.8048. The amount referenced is calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. See footnote 3 of our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this registration statements.


(2)		Statutory contributions of 9% of fees to a superannuation fund (i.e., pension) for Australian directors only.



(3)		Mr. Bosnjak’s fees represent A$120,000 paid in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the average exchange rate during the applicable period.



(4)		Mr. Carter’s fees represent A$18,930 paid in Australian dollars. Amounts were converted using the average exchange rate during the applicable period. This amount represents fees earned solely for serving as a director. For Mr. Carter’s other compensation, see — “Compensation of Named Executive Officers.”

During fiscal 2009, we paid each of our three non-employee directors different amounts of cash compensation. The levels of cash compensation were based on what our board believed was appropriate for a company of our size, with recognition given to the amount of time a particular director was required to spend on Company matters and the director’s length of board service. We paid Mr. Bosjnak an annual cash fee of A$120,000 for all of his services as a director, including his service as chairman of the board. We did not compensate him separately for attendance at meetings or for service on board committees. Mr. Bosjnak received the highest level of cash compensation in recognition of his long standing board service and the significant amount of time he spent on the Company’s affairs.

Mr. Galle was also paid an annual fee with no separate meeting or committee fees. His level of compensation was determined by negotiation between our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Galle at the time he joined the board.

Mr. Carter was also paid an annual cash fee with no separate meeting fees.

The amount under “Option Awards” represents share-based compensation expense in respect of (i) 166,667 options granted to Mr. Bosjnak in each of fiscal 2008 and 2009 at exercise prices of A$1.50 and A$1.98, respectively and (ii) 91,667 options granted to Mr. Galle in fiscal 2009 at an exercise price of A$2.10.

We have proposed the issuance of options to purchase ordinary shares to three members of the board of directors, Jeff Carter, John Lund and William Galle. Under such proposal, each of these board members would be entitled to receive 600,000 options exercisable at A$1.20 per share for a period of five years from the date of grant. The options would vest as follows: 100,000 options would vest on the date of grant, 150,000 options would vest on the 12 month anniversary from the date of grant, 150,000 options would vest on the 24 month anniversary from the date of grant and 200,000 options would vest on the 36 month anniversary from the date of grant. The issuance of these options is subject to shareholder approval at a meeting to be held on January 8, 2010. If shareholder approval is obtained and the options are granted, they will be exchanged for options to purchase our common stock in the ratio of one stock option for every six UMSL share options.


Item 7.		Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

During the last three fiscal years, we have been a party to the following transaction in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our capital stock, or their immediate family members, had a material interest.

On January 22, 2009, we entered into a consulting agreement with Jeff Carter, a member of our board of directors and former Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Carter will perform finance, accounting and secretarial consulting services in Australia. The agreement had an initial term of seven months that expired on September 30, 2009 and was extended for a six month term expiring on March 31, 2010. Under the agreement, we will pay Mr. Carter a fee for the consulting services of A$20,000 per month.

We review all relationships and transactions in which we and our directors and executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related party transactions. Our audit committee reviews and approves or ratifies any related party transaction pursuant to the authority given under the charter of the audit committee.

Director Independence

Our board of directors currently consists of five members: Jim Bosnjak, Alan Shortall, John Lund, William Galle and Jeff Carter. Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each consisting of Jim Bosnjak, John Lund and William Galle. Our board of directors has determined that each of Jim Bosnjak, John Lund, and William Galle is ‘independent” within the meaning of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the Nasdaq listing standards.


Item 8.		Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of our business, we may be subject to various claims, pending and potential legal actions for damages, investigations relating to governmental laws and regulations and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of our business. We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which any of our properties is the subject.


Item 9.		Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Market Information

UMSL’s ordinary shares have been traded on the ASX under the trading symbol “UNI” since November 1, 2002. Upon the completion of the redomiciliation transaction, subject to approval by the ASX, we will replace UMSL as the listed entity on the ASX and our shares of common stock will be traded on the ASX in the form of CDIs, each representing one-sixth of a share of our common stock.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of UMSL’s ordinary shares as reported on the ASX, in Australian dollars and as converted into United States dollars. These share prices do not reflect the one for six share consolidation in connection with the redomiciliation and represents actual high and low closing prices of UMSL ordinary shares.


	High		Low		High		Low
Period	(AU$)		(AU$)		(US$)		(US$)
Fiscal Year 2010:
Second Quarter		1.18		0.88		1.05		0.78
First Quarter		1.38		0.31		1.20		0.27
Fiscal Year 2009:
First Quarter		0.41		0.25		0.34		0.21
Second Quarter		0.29		0.18		0.20		0.12
Third Quarter		0.28		0.23		0.19		0.16
Fourth Quarter		0.31		0.25		0.25		0.20
Fiscal Year 2008:
First Quarter		0.31		0.20		0.28		0.18
Second Quarter		0.40		0.25		0.35		0.22
Third Quarter		0.36		0.21		0.33		0.19
Fourth Quarter		0.46		0.23		0.44		0.22

All currency conversions are based on the prevailing Australian dollar to the U.S. dollar rate on the last day of each respective quarter.

As of September 30, 2009, we had 37,010,802 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, and there were 6,955 holders of record of our common stock. We issued 6,291,535 additional shares of common stock to certain investors in connection with a recent financing in October and November of 2009. After the redomiciliation transaction which will be conducted in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act, approximately [____] shares of our common stock will be freely tradable and commencing 90 days after the effectiveness of this registration statement, approximately [____] shares of our common stock will be eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144. Mr. Alan Shortall, our CEO and director, has agreed, with certain limited exceptions, not to transfer or otherwise dispose of 833,333 shares of our common stock held by him until October 26, 2010.

As of September 30, 2009, 5,587,500 shares of our common stock were subject to outstanding stock options. We issued options to purchase 3,645,767 additional shares of common stock to certain investors, placement agents and advisors in November 2009. After the redomiciliation transaction, we plan to file a registration statement on Form S-8 to cover the issuance of approximately [____] shares of our common stock that are issuable upon exercise of outstanding options or options that may be issued in the future under our employee benefit plans.

We have submitted a listing application to the Nasdaq Capital Market for listing of our common stock. There can be no assurance that the listing application will be approved or that a U.S. trading market for our common stock will develop.

Dividends

We currently intend to retain any earnings to finance research and development and the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of any dividends in the future by us will be subject to the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of our operating subsidiaries, covenants associated with certain of our debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Moreover, if we determine to pay any dividend in the future, there can be no assurance that we will continue to pay such dividends. In addition, under our bank financing agreements, we are not permitted to pay cash dividends without the prior written consent of the lender.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2009 with respect to our equity compensation plans. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere is this registration statement for further information.

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Number of Securities

Future Issuance Under

to be Issued Upon

Weighted-Average

Equity Compensation

Exercise of

Exercise Price of

Plans (Excluding

Outstanding Options,

Securities Reflected in

Plan Category

Warrants and Rights

Column (a))

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

Employee Share Option Plan

4,072,500

1.54

(1)

2009 Stock Incentive Plan(2)

—

6,000,000

(3)

Agreement with individual consultant

83,333

3.00

—

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

Individual agreements with various consultants, advisors and other third parties

2,166,667

1.61

—

Total

6,322,500

1.58


(1)		Under this plan, no options can be offered if the total number of shares issuable upon exercise of such options, when aggregated with (i) the number of shares issued during the previous five years under the plan or any other similar plan available for employees and directors and (ii) the number of shares issuable upon exercise of options that are outstanding under the plan or any other similar plan available for employees and directors or that are being offered thereunder, but disregarding certain types of offers and grants, shall not exceed 5% of the total number of shares outstanding at the time of such offer. No further options will be granted under this plan after the reconciliation.

(2)		In connection with the redomiciliation transaction, shareholders of UMSL are being asked to approve this plan at an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

(3)		The number of shares available for issuance under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan adjusts annually commencing on January 1, 2011 as provided therein.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws may be considered as having an anti-takeover effect, such as those provisions:

•

authorizing our board of directors to issue from time to time any series of preferred stock and fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of such series of preferred stock;

•

prohibiting stockholders from acting by written consent in lieu of a meeting, effective upon the implementation date (the “Implementation Date”) of the Implementation Agreement between us and UMSL;

•

requiring advance notice of stockholder intention to put forth director nominees or bring up other business at a stockholders’ meeting;

•

prohibiting stockholders from calling a special meeting of stockholders;

•

requiring a 66²/3% majority stockholder approval in order for stockholders to amend our bylaws or adopt new bylaws; and

•

providing that, subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by our board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors (whether or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships). Newly created directorships resulting from any increase in our authorized number of directors will be filled only by a majority of our board of directors then in office, even less than a quorum, or, to the extent if there are no directors, by the stockholders.

We are also subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, which in general prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:

•

prior to that date, our board of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

•

upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder) those shares owned by (i) persons who are directors and also officers and (ii) employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

•

on or subsequent to that date, the business combination is approved by our board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66²/3% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as an entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by any of these entities or persons.

The above-summarized provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) and our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could make it more difficult to acquire us by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise, or to remove incumbent officers and directors. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and takeover bids that our board of directors may consider inadequate and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of our ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging takeover or acquisition proposals because, among other things, negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

Listing

We plan to apply to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol of “UNIS”. Subject to the approval by the ASX, our shares of common stock will be traded on the ASX in the form of CDIs under the symbol “UNS.”

Transfer Agent and Registrar

After the Implementation Date, the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited.


Item 12.		Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, our directors shall not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. Our Bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, we will indemnify, and advance expenses to, a director or officer in an action brought by reason of the fact that the director or officer is or was our director or officer, or is or was serving at our request as a director or officer of any other entity, against all expenses, liability and loss reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith. We may maintain insurance to protect a director or officer against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under Delaware law.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. However, these provisions do not limit or eliminate our rights, or those of any stockholder, to seek non-monetary relief such as injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a director’s duty of care. The provisions will not alter the liability of directors under the federal securities laws. In addition, your investment may be adversely affected to the extent that, in a class action or direct suit, we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions. There is currently no pending litigation or proceeding against any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.


Item 13.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our consolidated financial statements appear on pages F-1 through F-31 of this registration statement.


Item 14.		Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

The Company has not had a change in its independent registered public accounting firm during its last two fiscal years or through the date of this filing. However, as a result of the redomiciliation into the United States, the Company intends to change its public accounting firm to a U. S. firm. This change will likely occur subsequent to the effectiveness of this Form 10 and will be appropriately reported under Form 8-K. The Company notes that it has not had any disagreements with its current public accounting firm during the last two fiscal years or through the date of this filing on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the public accounting firm, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report on the Company’s financial statements.


Item 15.		Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a) Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements appear on pages F-1 through F-31 of this registration statement.

(b) Exhibits


Exhibit Number			Description
	2.1		Amended and Restated Merger Implementation Agreement dated as of September 1, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Unilife Corporation +

	2.2		Share Purchase Agreement among Unilife Medical Solutions Limited, Edward Paukovits, Jr., Keith Bocchicchio, and Daniel Adlon dated as of October 25, 2006 and amended as of September 26, 2007+

	3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Unilife Corporation**

3.2			Bylaws of Unilife Corporation**

	4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate**

	10.1		Exclusive Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie**

	10.2	*	First Amendment dated as of June 29, 2009 to Exclusive Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie**


Exhibit Number			Description
	10.3	*	Industrialization Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie

	10.4		Business Lease, dated as of August 17, 2005, between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and AMC Delancey Heartland Partners, L.P.**

	10.5		Agreement dated as of September 15, 2003 between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and B. Braun Medical, Inc. and amendments thereto

	10.6		Promissory Note, dated as of December 30, 2005 between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and Commerce Bank**

	10.7		Promissory Note, dated as of August 25, 2006 between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and Commerce Bank**

	10.8		Employment Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2008 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Alan Shortall**

	10.9		Employment Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2005 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Jeff Carter**

	10.10		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Daniel Calvert**

	10.11		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Bernhard Opitz**

	10.12		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Mark Iampietro**

	10.13		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Stephen Allan**

	10.14		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Eugene Shortall**

	10.15		Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Joblak Pty Ltd**

	10.16		Deed of Mutual Release, dated January 12, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Jeff Carter**

	10.17		Unilife Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan**

	10.18		Unilife Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan**

	10.19		Unilife Medical Solutions Limited Exempt Employee Share Plan**

	10.20	*	Agreement dated November 12, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Mikron Assembly Technology

	10.21		Purchase and Mutual Indemnification Agreement dated November 16, 2009 between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Greenspring Partners, LP

	10.22		Offer of assistance dated October 16, 2009 from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Unilife Medical Solutions and acceptance of the offer

	10.23		Agreement Between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and L2 Architecture dated as of December 29, 2009, as amended

	10.24		Agreement between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and HSC Builders & Construction Managers dated as of December 14, 2009, as amended

	10.25		Development Agreement, dated December 14, 2009 between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Keystone Redevelopment Group LLC

	10.26		Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated December 14, 2009 of Unilife Cross Farm LLC

	10.27		Form of Share Purchase Agreement between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and each of the US investors in the October and November 2009 private placement

	10.28		Form of Subscription Agreement between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and each of the Australian investors in the October and November 2009 private placement

	10.29		2009 Share Purchase Plan Terms and Conditions

	21		List of subsidiaries of Unilife Corporation


+		The annexures, schedules and exhibits to this exhibit have been omitted. A copy of any omitted annexure, schedule or exhibit will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission supplementally upon request.

*		Confidential treatment has been requested for certain provisions of this Exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

**		Previously filed.

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Description of Business and Unaudited Financial Statements

Unilife Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a medical device company focused on the design, development, manufacture and supply of a proprietary range of retractable syringes. The primary target customers for the Company’s products include pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers of medical equipment to healthcare facilities or patients who self-administer prescription medication. The Company also manufactures non-proprietary Class I and Class II medical devices, such as specialty syringes under contract for outsourcing customers.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. Interim results may not be indicative of results for a full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained in this registration statement for the year ended June 30, 2009.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Unilife Medical Solutions Limited (“UMSL”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, a newly formed subsidiary, Unilife Corporation, will become UMSL’s parent holding company in a transaction described below. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in U.S. currency. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

On September 1, 2009, UMSL announced that it entered into a Merger Implementation Agreement with Unilife Corporation, pursuant to which shareholders and optionholders of UMSL will exchange their existing interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife Corporation and Unilife Corporation will become the parent, or ultimate parent of UMSL and its subsidiaries. Each holder of UMSL ordinary shares or share options will receive one share of common stock or one stock option, of Unilife Corporation for every six UMSL ordinary shares or share options, respectively, held by such holder, unless a holder of UMSL ordinary shares elects to receive, in lieu of common stock, Chess Depository Interests, or CDI’s (each representing one-sixth of a share of the Company’s common stock) of the Company, in which case such holder will receive one CDI of Unilife Corporation for each ordinary share of UMSL. All share and per share data have been retroactively restated to reflect the one for six share consolidation. The redomiciliation transaction is subject to various conditions, including without limitation, approval by the Australian Federal Court, approval by the shareholders and optionholders of UMSL, and a report by an independent expert concluding that the redomiciliation transaction is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the shareholders and optionholders.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of plastic syringe components and include direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the first in, first out method. The Company routinely reviews its inventory for obsolete, slow moving or otherwise impaired inventory and records estimated impairments in the periods in which they occur. Inventories consist of the following:


	September 30, 2009		June 30, 2009
Raw materials	$	581	$	567
Work in process		1,032		530

Total inventories	$	1,613	$	1,097

F-6

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the value of net assets acquired in business acquisitions. Goodwill is subject to, at a minimum, an annual impairment assessment of its carrying value. Additional impairment assessments would be performed if events and circumstances warranted such additional assessments during the year. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimated fair values of the reporting units are estimated using an earnings model and a discounted cash flow valuation model. The discounted cash flow model incorporates the Company’s estimates of future cash flows, future growth rates and management’s judgment regarding the applicable discount rates used to discount those estimated cash flows. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit, if lower than the carrying value of the respective reporting unit (such carrying value determined after management allocation of certain shared assets), would then be allocated to the reporting unit’s net identifiable assets based on their respective estimated fair values. The remaining unallocated reporting unit fair value, if any, would then be compared to the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill and, if lower, the Company would recognize an impairment charge to the extent of the deficiency. There were no impairments recorded on goodwill during the three months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.

Definite-lived intangible assets include patents which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 15 years. The Company reviews intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted) expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of an asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. Measurement of an impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. There were no impairments recorded on intangible assets during the three months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.

The Company expenses costs related to internally developed patents as incurred.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company grants both stock options and shares as compensation to its employees, directors and consultants. Certain employee and director awards vest over stated service periods and others also require achievement of specific performance or market conditions. The Company expenses the grant date fair value of awards to employees and directors over their respective service periods or over the period from grant date to the date the required performance or market conditionals are expected to be met, if shorter. To the extent that employee and director awards vest only upon the achievement of a specific performance or market condition, expense is recognized over the period from the date management determines that the conditions are achievable through the date they are expected to be met. Awards granted to consultants are sometimes granted for past services, in which case their fair value is expensed on their grant date, and sometimes granted with future service, performance or market conditions. Timing of expense recognition for consultant awards is similar to that of employee and director awards; however, aggregate expense is re-measured each quarter end based on the fair value of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the exception of market-based performance grants, which are valued based on a Barrier pricing model. Option pricing methods require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. See Note 3 for additional information regarding share-based compensation.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from licensing fees, industrialization efforts and products sold.

In early fiscal 2008, the Company granted an exclusive licensing arrangement to allow its pharmaceutical partner to use certain of the Company’s intellectual property in order and solely to develop in collaboration with the Company, the Company’s Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the pre-filled syringe market. The up-front, non-refundable fee paid for this license is being amortized over the expected life of the related agreement. In late fiscal 2009, the Company entered into an industrialization agreement with its pharmaceutical partner, retroactive to July 2008, under which the Company received payments upon achievement of certain pre-defined milestones in its development of the Unifill syringe. Revenue is recognized upon achievement of the “at risk” milestone events, which represents the culmination of the earnings process related to such events. Milestones include specific phases of the project such as product design, prototype availability, user tests, manufacturing proof of principle and the various steps to complete the industrialization of the product. Specific payment amounts and completion dates were established for each milestone payment. Revenue recognized is commensurate with the milestones achieved. Billings are similarly triggered and the Company has no future performance obligations related to previous milestone payments. Each milestone payment is non-refundable when made.

F-7

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The Company recognizes revenue from sales of products at the time of shipment and when title passes to the customer. These amounts were $680 and $1,691 during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification ™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (”SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 represents the last numbered standard issued by the FASB under the old (pre-codification) numbering system, and amends the GAAP hierarchy. On July 1, 2009, the FASB launched its new codification (i.e. the FASB Accounting Standards Codification). The codification supersedes existing GAAP for nongovernmental entities.

In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 855, Subsequent Events, formerly SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events.” ASC 855 sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was January 5, 2010.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides guidance on how to measure liabilities at fair value in circumstance in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. This update is effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. The Company has no liabilities that are governed by this update but will apply its provisions in the future as applicable.

3. Share-Based Compensation

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options and grants of common stock to employees, directors and consultants of $570 and $93 during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized related to these awards was $171 and $28 during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which was fully offset by changes in the Company’s valuation allowance.

Stock Options

The Company has granted stock options to certain employees and directors under the Employee Share Option Plan, (the “Plan”). The Plan is designed to assist in the motivation and retention of employees and to recognize the importance of employees to the long-term performance and success of the Company. The Company has also granted stock options to certain consultants outside of the Plan. The majority of the options to purchase common stock vest on the anniversary of the date of grant, which ranges from one to three years. Additionally, certain stock options vest upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock reaching certain minimum levels, as defined in the agreements. Finally, certain other stock options vest upon the meeting of certain Company milestones such as the signing of specific agreements and the completion of the Company’s anticipated listing on a U.S. stock exchange. As of September 30, 2009, the Company expects that all such market and performance conditions will be met. Share-based compensation expense related to these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting term. The Plan does not provide for a fixed number of available shares.

F-8

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The following is a summary of the Plan and non-Plan stock option activity during the three months ended September 30, 2009:


						Weighted-
						Average
				Weighted-		Remaining
	Number of			Average		Contractual		Aggregate
	Options			Exercise Price		Life (in years)		Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of July 1, 2009		6,322,500		$	1.58
Granted		83,333			1.83
Exercised		(385,000	)		1.31
Cancelled		(433,333	)		2.14

Outstanding as of September 30, 2009		5,587,500		$	1.56		2.6	$	30,916

Exercisable as of September 30, 2009		3,729,167		$	1.69		2.2	$	20,763

The aggregate intrinsic value is defined as the difference between the market value of the Company’s common stock as of the end of the period and the exercise price of the in-the-money stock options. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $1,030 and $0, respectively. Of the 1,858,333 non vested options, 83,333 are held by consultants.

The fair value of each stock option is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the exception of grants subject to market conditions which are valued based on a Barrier option pricing model. The Company has not historically paid dividends to its shareholders, and, as a result assumed a dividend yield of 0%. The risk free interest rate is based upon the rates of Australian bonds with a term equal to the expected term of the option. The expected volatility is based upon the historical share price of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of the stock options to purchase common stock is based upon the outstanding contractual term of the stock option on the date of grant. The Company used the following weighted-average assumptions in calculating the fair value of options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.


	Three Months ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Expected dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.78	%		4.76	%
Expected volatility		80	%		80	%
Expected life (in years)		3.0			3.8

4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the three months ended September 30, 2009 are as follows:


Balance as of July 1, 2009	$	10,235
Foreign currency translation		755

Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	10,990

In connection with the acquisition of Unitract Syringe Pty Limited in October 2002, the Company agreed to issue 1,666,667 shares of common stock to certain former shareholders of Unitract Syringe Pty Limited if the Company reported net income of at least A$6,500 during any fiscal year prior to October 31, 2014, as amended. The agreement also provided for the issuance of an additional 1,666,667 shares of common stock upon the Company reporting net income of at least A$12,000 during any fiscal year prior to October 31, 2014. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company met both the net income requirements, and as a result, has accrued for the issuance of 3,333,333 shares based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2009. These shares were issued in November 2009.

As of September 30, 2009, intangible assets consist of patents acquired in a business acquisition of $80. Related accumulated amortization as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009 was $39 and $37, respectively, and future amortization expense is scheduled to be $5 annually.

F-9

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 options to purchase 5,587,500 and 3,339,167 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

7. Contingencies

The Company is involved in, or has pending, various legal proceedings, claims, suits and complaints arising out of the normal course of business. Based on the facts currently available to the Company, management believes that these claims, suits and complaints are adequately provided for, covered by insurance, without merit or not probable that an unfavorable outcome will result.

8. Business Alliance

On June 30, 2008 the Company signed an exclusive licensing agreement with a pharmaceutical company, sanofi-aventis, which was amended in June, 2009. Under the amended agreement, the Company has granted sanofi-aventis an exclusive license to certain of the Company’s intellectual property in order and solely to develop, in collaboration with the Company, the Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the pre-filled syringe market within those therapeutic areas to be agreed upon between the Company and sanofi-aventis and a non-exclusive license outside those therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis or after the expiration of the exclusive license with sanofi-aventis. Pursuant to the exclusive licensing agreement, sanofi-aventis has paid the Company a 10,000 Euro ($13,024) up front non-refundable one-time fee. The exclusive license granted thereunder has an initial term expiring on June 30, 2014, unless the Company and sanofi-aventis fail to agree upon the list of therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis, in which event the exclusive license will have a term until June 29, 2012 for all therapeutic areas. If during the term of the exclusive license, sanofi-aventis has purchased the Unifill syringe for use with a particular drug product, sanofi-aventis will receive a ten-year extension of the term of the exclusive license, which extension will be reduced to five years if sanofi-aventis does not sell a minimum of 20,000 units of the product in any of the first five years of such ten-year extension period. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $2,456 of this up front payment as revenue and deferred $10,568 which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement. During the three months ended September 30, 2009 the Company recognized $683 of this up front payment as revenue.

Under the exclusive licensing agreement, the Company is not precluded from using certain of its intellectual property to develop, license and sell any products in any market other than the ready-to-fill syringe market, or from entering into licensing or other business arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies for the ready-to-fill syringe market outside those therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis, or after the expiration of the exclusive license with sanofi-aventis. If the Company grants a license to a third party in respect of the ready-to-fill syringe market, then the Company is required to pay sanofi-aventis 70% of any access, license or other upfront fee received from such third party for access to purchase the products until our payments to sanofi-aventis have totaled €10 million, following which the Company is required to pay 30% of such fees it receives through the end of the initial exclusivity period. The Company is also required to pay sanofi-aventis an annual royalty payment of 5% of the revenue generated from any sale of the Unifill syringe to third parties, up to a maximum amount of €17 million in such royalty payments.

Under a related industrialization agreement, signed on June 30, 2009, sanofi-aventis has agreed to pay the Company up to 17,000 Euro ($23,400) in milestone-based payments to fund the completion of the Company’s industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. The industrialization program began in July 2008 and is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2010. The industrialization agreement requires sanofi-aventis to provide a list to the Company that specifies therapeutic drug classes for which it seeks to market the Unifill syringe on an exclusive basis. The Company and sanofi-aventis will then discuss the exclusivity list during a several month negotiation period, and if the list is agreed, sanofi-aventis will retain exclusive rights to the use of the product within these designated therapeutic drug classes until June 30, 2014, subject to the extension described above. If the Company and sanofi-aventis are unable to reach an agreement on the list, sanofi-aventis will retain full exclusivity across all therapeutic classes until July 1, 2012. Unless terminated earlier, the industrialization agreement has a term until the completion of the industrialization program. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $13,601 in revenue related to the milestones achieved under the industrialization agreement of which $7,024 was collected after year end. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $1,745 in revenue related to the milestones achieved.

F-11

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

9. Subsequent Events

On October 8, 2009, UMSL issued 3,460,344 ordinary shares in a private placement to a group of sophisticated and professional Australian investors and accredited investors in the United States, and subject to shareholder approval, agreed to issue to the investors an additional 2,831,191 ordinary shares and options to purchase 3,145,767 ordinary shares. UMSL obtained shareholder approval for the issuance of the additional ordinary shares and share options at a meeting held on November 13, 2009. All of the ordinary shares were issued at a price of A$5.10 per share for aggregate proceeds of A$32.086 and all of the share options were issued for no additional consideration. Each of the share options is exercisable within three years after the date of grant. Half of the share options have an exercise price of A$7.50 per share, and the other half of the share options have an exercise price of A$12.00 per share. In conjunction with the private placement, UMSL’s Australian and New Zealand shareholders were offered, and some of them purchased ordinary shares under a share purchase plan, at a price of A$5.10 per share, for a total consideration of A$21,500. In addition, after receiving shareholder approval on November 13, 2009, UMSL issued share options to purchase up to 500,000 ordinary shares to certain advisors and brokers as compensation for their services with respect to the private placement and the share purchase plan. These share options have the same terms as the share options issued to the investors. The proceeds from the private placement and the share purchase plan will be used to accelerate the expansion of the Company’s U.S. operational capabilities and production facilities, to purchase capital equipment and complete the industrialization program for the Unifill syringe.

While the private placement was conducted by UMSL prior to the redomiciliation, all of the share numbers and share option exercise prices referred to above give effect to the share consolidation we will effect in connection with the redomiciliation (one share of our common stock equals six ordinary shares of UMSL). The ordinary shares and share options issued in the placement will be exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock and options to purchase the Company’s common stock in connection with the redomiciliation.

During October 2009, the Company accepted a $5,200 offer of assistance from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The offer includes $2,000 for the development of the Company’s new global headquarters and manufacturing facility as well as up to $2,000 in low interest financing loans for land, building, acquisition and construction costs. The offer also includes a $500 opportunity grant, as well as $500 in tax credits. Finally, the offer includes up to $200 for the reimbursement of eligible job training costs. The offer is based on the Company’s proposed project being expected to create more than 200 new full-time jobs by December 31, 2012, to retain the Company’s 97 existing employees and to have a total cost of $86,000 and is contingent upon the Company submitting complete applications and meeting all program guidelines. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to receive all or any of the assistance for the Company’s current development project or otherwise.

On November 12, 2009, the Company signed a purchase agreement with Mikron Assembly Technology for the development and supply of a pilot automated assembly system to support the commercial production of its Unifill syringe. The development of the system is scheduled to begin during December 2009, with scheduled completion and installation into the Company’s new facility during the fourth quarter of 2010. The Company anticipates that this automated assembly system will have a target production capacity of approximately 60 million units per year.

On November 16, 2009, through Unilife Cross Farm, LLC (“Unilife CF”), the Company’s newly formed subsidiary, the Company acquired a 38 acre block of land in York County, Pennsylvania from Greenspring Partners, LP for a purchase price of $1,991.

On November 17, 2009, the Company issued 3,333,333 shares to former shareholders of Unitract Syringe Pty Limited. The value of these shares was accrued as of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009.

On December 14, 2009, Unilife CF entered into a development agreement with Keystone Redevelopment Group, LLC (“Keystone’) to develop the Company’s new 165,000 square foot office, manufacturing, warehousing and distribution facility to its specifications. In accordance with the agreement, Keystone will assist the Company with the selection of, as well as the review and management of, architects, engineers, designers, contractors and other experts and consultants engaged to assist in the development of the new facility. Additionally, Keystone will assist the Company in obtaining financing for the facility. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will pay Keystone a total of $754.

On December 14, 2009, Unilife CF entered into a Construction Agreement with HSC Builders & Construction Managers of Pennsylvania (“HSC”) to construct the new facility for a total of 1.25% of the cost of work, which is estimated to be $268. Additionally, on December 29, 2009, Unilife CF entered into an agreement with L2 Architecture (”L2”) to provide architectural design and structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services for the new facility for a total cost of $1,560.

The Company has prepared a detailed budget for developing the new facility and based on this budget the total cost is estimated to be approximately $26,000. This includes the projected construction costs, the projected manufacturing facility fit out costs and the fees payable to Keystone, HSC and L2.

The Company has provided for $8,000 - $10,000 in projected capital expenditure to be used towards the development of the new facility. At this stage, the Company intends to fund up to approximately $9,000 of the development costs for the new facility out of its existing cash reserves, which includes amounts received in connection with the Company’s October and November 2009 equity financings and will seek external financing for up to approximately $17,000 from a commercial bank or other lending institution in the U.S. and/or from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or other federal and state bodies.

F-12

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Description of Business

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Unilife Medical Solutions Limited (“UMSL”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, a newly formed subsidiary, Unilife Corporation, will become UMSL’s parent holding company in a transaction described in Note 15. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in U.S. currency. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash on hand, deposits at banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost which approximates fair value.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers, which also represents the net realizable amount. The Company has historically not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts, but rather evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable on a periodic basis. In instances in which management is aware of circumstances that may impair a particular customer’s ability to meet its obligation, the related obligation would be written off. Accounts receivable as of June 30, 2009 consists principally of amounts due from a pharmaceutical company related to the achievement of certain milestones under the related industrialization agreement described in Note 13.

Inventories


	June 30,
	2009		2008
Raw materials	$	567	$	457
Work in process		530		608

Total inventories	$	1,097	$	1,065

F-18

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, including significant improvements, are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation and amortization expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset as listed below:


Asset Category		Useful Lives
Machinery and equipment		3 to 15 years
Furniture and fixtures		7 years
Leasehold improvements		Shorter of improvement life or remaining term of lease

The Company reviews the carrying value of the long-lived assets periodically to determine if facts and circumstances exist that would suggest that assets might be impaired or that the useful lives should be modified. Among the factors the Company considers in making the evaluation are changes in market position and profitability. If facts and circumstances are present which may indicate impairment is probable, the Company will prepare a projection of the undiscounted cash flows of the specific business entity and determine if the long-lived assets are recoverable based on these undiscounted cash flows. If impairment is indicated, an adjustment will be made to reduce the carrying amount of these assets to their fair value.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the value of net assets acquired in business acquisitions. Goodwill is subject to, at a minimum, an annual impairment assessment of its carrying value. Additional impairment assessments would be performed if events and circumstances warranted such additional assessments during the year. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimated fair values of the reporting units are estimated using an earnings model and a discounted cash flow valuation model. The discounted cash flow model incorporates the Company’s estimates of future cash flows, allocations of certain assets and cash flows among reporting units, future growth rates and management’s judgment regarding the applicable discount rates used to discount those estimated cash flows. The estimated fair value of each reporting unit, if lower than the carrying value of the respective reporting unit (such carrying value determined after management allocation of certain shared assets), would then be allocated to the reporting unit’s net identifiable assets based on their respective estimated fair values. The remaining unallocated reporting unit fair value, if any, would then be compared to the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill and, if lower, the Company would recognize an impairment charge to the extent of the deficiency. There were no impairments recorded on goodwill during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

The Company expenses costs related to internally developed patents as incurred.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred in connection with debt financings. These costs are amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective interest rate method.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect tax credit carryforwards and the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

F-19

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The Company requires that the realization of an uncertain income tax position must be “more likely than not” (i.e., greater than 50% likelihood of receiving a benefit) before it can be recognized in the financial statements. The benefit to be recorded in the financial statements is the amount most likely to be realized assuming a review by tax authorities having all relevant information and applying current conventions. The Company includes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions within the provision (benefit) for income taxes within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued revised guidance regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. The new guidance requires that the Company determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority. If a tax position meets the more likely than not recognition criteria, the tax position be measured at the largest amount of benefit greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This accounting standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management has evaluated the positions taken in connection with the tax provisions and tax compliance for the years included in these financial statements. The Company does not believe that any positions it has taken will not prevail on a more likely than not basis. As such no disclosure of such positions was deemed necessary. Our open tax years include all returns filed for 2002 and later in Australia and for 2005 and later in the United States. Should the Company be required to provide for interest or penalties in regards to its tax positions, such changes will be included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of financial instruments such as accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair value because of the short maturity of these items. The Company believes that the current carrying amount of its long-term debt approximates fair value because the interest rates on these instruments are subject to change with, or approximate, market interest rates.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company grants both stock options and shares as compensation to its employees, directors and consultants. Certain employee and director awards vest over stated service periods and others also require achievement of specific performance or market conditions. The Company expenses the grant date fair value of awards to employees and directors over their respective service periods or over the period from grant date to the date the required performance or market conditions are expected to be met, if shorter. To the extent that employee and director awards vest only upon the achievement of a specific performance condition, expense is recognized over the period from the date management determines that the conditions are achievable through the date they are expected to be met. Awards granted to consultants are sometimes granted for past services, in which case their fair value is expensed on their grant date, and sometimes granted with future service, performance or market conditions. Timing of expense recognition for consultant awards is similar to that of employee and director awards; however, aggregate expense is re-measured each quarter end based on the fair value of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the exception of market-based performance grants, which are valued based on a Barrier pricing model. Option pricing methods require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. See Note 3 for additional information regarding share-based compensation.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Australian dollar (“A$”) is the functional currency for the Company’s Australian operations. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange existing at the year-end date. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average annual exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from these translations are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and will be included in income upon sale or liquidation of the foreign investment. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, denominated in a currency other than the functional currency, are recorded in other (income) expense within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and aggregated $345, $(19) and $1 during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

F-20

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) consists only of foreign currency translation adjustments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from licensing fees, industrialization efforts and products sold.

The Company recognizes revenue from sales of products at the time of shipment and when title passes to the customer. These amounts were $3,874, $3,420 and $1,946 during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. The Company incurred total advertising costs of $51, $43 and $38 during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs, which primarily consist of salaries, benefits and contracted services are expensed as incurred.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earning (loss) per share is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issued through common stock equivalents. The dilutive effect of potential common shares, consisting of outstanding options to purchase common stock, is calculated using the treasury stock method.

Government Grants

Government grants are recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all attached conditions will be complied with. When a grant relates to an expense item, it is recognized as income over the period necessary to match the grant on a systematic basis to the costs that it is intended to compensate. When a grant relates to an asset, it is recognized as deferred income and recognized in the income statement on a systematic basis over the expected useful life of the related asset.

F-21

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”) SFAS 168 represents the last numbered standard issued by the FASB under the old (pre-codification) numbering system, and amends the GAAP hierarchy. On July 1, 2009, the FASB launched its new codification (i.e. the FASB Accounting Standards Codification). The codification supersedes existing GAAP for nongovernmental entities.

In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 805, Business Combinations, formerly SFAS No. 141 (revised), “Business Combinations”. ASC 805 significantly changes the accounting and disclosure requirements for business combinations. ASC 805 is effective for business combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. ASC 805 will be applied prospectively to business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the effective date. The impact that the adoption of ASC 805 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements will be dependent upon the extent of future business combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 810, Consolidation, formerly SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — and amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51”. This new standard establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. ASC 810 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company currently has no noncontrolling interests and therefore, does not believe that the adoption of ASC 810 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, formerly FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. This new standard amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142,”Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This new standard also provides guidance for expanded disclosures related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, formerly FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. This new standard states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard included in ASC 855, Subsequent Events, formerly SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”. ASC 855 sets forth: 1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; 2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and 3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has adopted ASC 855 for its year ended June 30, 2009. The Company originally evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were originally issued, which was November 12, 2009. The Company re-evaluated subsequent events through January 5, 2010 (unaudited) for purposes of the reissuance of these statements on that date.

F-22

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

3. Equity and Share-Based Compensation

During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 980,571 and 2,303,562 shares of its common stock in a private placement with various investors at a price of $0.90 and $1.26 per share, respectively. The aggregate offering price of the private placement was approximately $3,785, and the net proceeds to the Company, after payment of approximately $237 in expenses, was approximately $3,548.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 2,333,333 shares of its common stock in a private placement with various investors at a price of $1.32. The aggregate offering price of the private placement was approximately $3,080, and the net proceeds to the Company, after payment of approximately $256 in expenses, was approximately $2,824.

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options and grants of common stock to employees, directors and consultants of $3,059, $846 and $509 during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increased expense during the year ended June 30, 2009 is primarily related to more awards issued during that fiscal year compared to prior fiscal years. The total tax benefit recognized related to these awards was $918, $254 and $153 during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which was fully offset by changes in the Company’s valuation allowance. The Company calculated its available APIC pool of net excess benefits using the transition method as defined in ASC 718.

As of June 30, 2009, the total compensation cost related to all nonvested awards not yet recognized is $895. This amount is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average period of 0.58 years.

Stock Options

The Company has granted stock options to certain employees and directors under the Employee Share Option Plan, (the “Plan”). The Plan is designed to assist in the motivation and retention of employees and to recognize the importance of employees to the long-term performance and success of the Company. The Company has also granted stock options to certain consultants outside of the Plan. The majority of the options to purchase common stock vest on the anniversary of the date of grant, which ranges from one to three years. Additionally, certain stock options vest upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock reaching certain minimum levels, as defined in the agreements. Finally, certain other stock options vest upon the meeting of certain Company milestones such as the signing of specific agreements and the completion of the Company’s anticipated listing on a U.S. stock exchange. As of June 30, 2009, the Company expects that all such market and performance conditions will be met. Share-based compensation expense related to these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting term. The Plan does not provide for a fixed number of available shares.

The following is a summary of the Plan and non-Plan stock option activity during the year ended June 30, 2009:


						Weighted-
						Average
				Weighted-		Remaining
	Number of			Average Exercise		Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic
	Options			Price		(in years)		Value
Outstanding as of July 1, 2008		9,438,996		$	2.00			$
Granted		3,850,000			1.63
Exercised		(97,531	)		0.33
Cancellations		(6,868,965	)		2.20

Outstanding as of June 30, 2009		6,322,500		$	1.58		2.5	$	551

Exercisable as of June 30, 2009		3,339,167		$	1.56		1.9	$	519

The aggregate intrinsic value is defined as the difference between the market value of the Company’s common stock as of the end of the period and the exercise price of the in-the-money stock options. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $93, $120, and $0, respectively. Of the 2,983,333 non vested options, 316,667 are held by consultants, the majority of which vested in August 2009.

F-23

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2009:


	Outstanding Options						Exercisable Options
					Weighted-						Weighted-
			Weighted-		Average						Average
			Average		Remaining				Weighted-		Remaining
Range of Exercise	Outstanding as of		Exercise		Contractual		Exercisable as of		Average		Contractual Life
Prices	June 30, 2009		Price		Life (in years)		June 30, 2009		Exercise Price		(in years)
$0.00 – $1.50		2,041,667	$	1.23		1.5		1,791,667	$	1.20		1.3
$1.56 – $1.80		3,733,333		1.61		3.3		1,083,333		1.62		3.2
$1.86 – $9.30		547,500		2.72		1.3		464,167		2.82		1.3

		6,322,500	$	1.58		2.5		3,339,167	$	1.56		1.9

The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0.62, $0.87, and $0.42 respectively.


	2009			2008			2007
Expected dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.76	%		5.61	%		6.05	%
Expected volatility		80	%		55	%		67	%
Expected life (in years)		4.4			3.5			2.8

Grants of Common Stock to Employees

During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company granted 45,885 and 22,033 shares of common stock, respectively, to certain employees. During the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded a charge to operations of $44 and $48, respectively, related to these awards.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company granted 1,666,667 shares of common stock to its Chief Executive Officer. The shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions in which 833,333 cannot be sold until the first anniversary of the date of grant and 833,334 cannot be sold until the second anniversary of the date of grant. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a charge to operations of $1,541 related to these awards. The charge represents the entire fair value of the awards.

F-24

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

4. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:


	June 30,
	2009			2008
Machinery and equipment	$	5,906		$	4,890
Furniture and fixtures		787			540
Construction in progress		3,041			3,222
Leasehold improvements		1,067			737

		10,801			9,389

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,664	)		(1,590	)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$	9,137		$	7,799

Construction in progress consists primarily of amounts incurred in connection with the construction of machinery that will be used to manufacture the Company’s Unitract 1 mL Syringe.

During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company ceased operations at its Australian facility. The Company determined that it was not economically favorable to relocate certain manufacturing equipment to the new U.S. facility. In connection with this closing, the Company recorded an impairment on property, plant and equipment and a loss on the sale of property, plant and equipment of $547 and $1,608, respectively.

5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 are as follows:


Balance as of July 1, 2007	$	4,946
Foreign currency translation		609

Balance as of June 30, 2008		5,555
Issuance of stock options in connection with the acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc		457
Issuance of common stock to former Unitract Syringe Pty Limited shareholders		5,070
Foreign currency translation		(847	)

Balance as of June 30, 2009	$	10,235

During the year ended June 30, 2008, as approved by the stockholders, the Company granted options to purchase 1,166,667 shares of common stock to certain selling shareholders in connection with the acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc. The vesting terms of the options were based upon the signing of the exclusive licensing agreement with sanofi-avenits. During the year ended June 30, 2009, options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock vested and as a result, the Company has recorded $457 as an increase to goodwill based on the Black-Scholes pricing model assumptions as of June 30, 2008. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the remaining options to purchase 666,667 shares of common stock were cancelled, as the related financial milestones were not achieved.

As of June 30, 2009, intangible assets consist of patents acquired in a business acquisition of $80. Related accumulated amortization as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $37 and $20, respectively, and future amortization expense is scheduled to be $5 annually.

F-25

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

6. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following:


	June 30,
	2009		2008
Accrued payroll and other employee related expenses	$	671	$	494
Accrued interest		—		108
Accrued other		356		629
Provision for the issuance of common stock to former Unitract Syringe Pty Limited shareholders		5,070		—

Total accrued expenses	$	6,097	$	1,231

7. Commitments

The Company leases certain facilities, office equipment and automobiles under non-cancellable operating leases. The future minimum lease payments related to the Company’s non-cancellable operating lease commitments as of June 30, 2009 were as follows:


For the year ending June 30,
2010	$	455
2011		415
2012		340
2013		43

	$	1,253

Rental expenses under operating leases during the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $686, $583 and $649, respectively.

8. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:


	June 30,
	2009		2008
Bank term loans	$	2,709	$	2,946
Pennsylvania State assisted loans		424		514
Convertible notes		—		749
MedPro Safety Products note payable		—		3,000

		3,133		7,209
Less: current portion of long-term debt		405		4,169

Total long-term debt	$	2,728	$	3,040

Bank term loans include four term loans payable. The loans bear interest at a rate of prime (3.25% as of June 30, 2009) plus 1.50% (4.75% as of June 30, 2009) per annum and mature on dates ranging from December 2010 through August 2021. The borrowings under the bank term loans are collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventory and certain pieces of machinery and equipment and are subject to certain financial covenants which require the Company’s tangible assets to equal at least 10% of the balance sheet equity determined in accordance with GAAP. Under the term loan agreements, the Company is not permitted to pay cash dividends without the prior written consent of the lender. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2009.

The Company has qualified for the two Pennsylvania state assisted loans for the purchase of specific machinery and equipment. These loans bear interest at rates ranging from 2.75% to 3.25% per annum and mature on dates ranging from July 2011 through July 2013. The borrowings under the state assisted loans are collateralized by certain production equipment.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued A$2,000 (approximately $1,920) of convertible notes which were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of A$1.5 (approximately $1.44) per share. Interest was payable semi-annually at a rate of 12% per annum. A$780 and $A1,220 of these convertible notes were exchanged for 520,000 and 813,334 shares of the Company’s common stock during the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F-26

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

10. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:


	Year ended June 30,
	2009								2008								2007

	Current		Deferred			Total			Current		Deferred			Total			Current		Deferred			Total
Federal	$	—	$	(1,070	)	$	(1,070	)	$	—	$	(755	)	$	(755	)	$	—	$	(544	)	$	(544	)
State		—		(339	)		(339	)		—		(123	)		(123	)		—		(82	)		(82	)
Australian		—		(663	)		(663	)		—		(9,883	)		(9,883	)		—		(7,962	)		(7,962	)
Changes in valuation allowance		—		2,072			2,072			—		10,761			10,761			—		8,588			8,588

Total income tax benefit	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—

Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities

In 2005, the Company qualified and was awarded Job Creation Tax Credits from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Community and Economic Development. The maximum credits the Company qualifies for was $21 in Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax, which expires in 2012. The credits are contingent on the Company maintaining its operating facility in York County, Pennsylvania, continued operations for five years after the award, creating 65 full-time jobs within three years which pay at least 150% of the Federal minimum wage rate and investing at least $2,425 in the business.

In assessing the realizability of deferred income tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. In assessing the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, which are principally net operating loss carry forwards, management considers the reversal of deferred tax liabilities which are scheduled to reverse during the carry forward period and tax planning strategies.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal, state and Australian income tax purposes of approximately $3,146, $3,118 and $17,562, respectively which are available to offset future taxable income, if any. The federal, state and Australian net operating loss carry forwards begin to expire on various dates from 2023 through 2029.

Deferred taxes are comprised of the following at June 30, 2009 and 2008.


	June 30,
	2009			2008

Net operating loss carryforwards	$	4,208		$	10,270
Share-based compensation expense		1,112			183
Deferred revenue		3,170			—
Depreciation differences		239			55
Valuation allowance		(8,729	)		(10,508	)

Net deferred taxes	$	—		$	—

F-28

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate as follows:


	Year ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2007
Tax at U.S. statutory rate		(35	%)		(35	%)		(34	%)
State taxes, net of federal benefit		(11	%)		(6	%)		(5	%)
Non-deductible and non-taxable items		2	%		1	%		—	%
Change in valuation allowance		44	%		40	%		39	%

		0	%		0	%		0	%

11. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering all U.S. employees. Participating employees may contribute up to 100% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the statutory limits. During the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company did not match any employee contributions.

12. Contingencies

13. Business Alliance

On June 30, 2008 the Company signed an exclusive licensing agreement with a pharmaceutical company, sanofi-aventis, which was amended in June, 2009. Under the amended agreement, the Company has granted sanoifi-aventis an exclusive license to certain of the Company’s intellectual property in order and solely to develop, in collaboration with the Company, the Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the pre-filled syringe market within those therapeutic areas to be agreed upon between the Company and sanofi-aventis and a non-exclusive license outside those therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis or after the expiration of the exclusive license with sanofi-aventis. Pursuant to the exclusive licensing agreement, sanofi-aventis has paid the Company a 10,000 Euro ($13,024) up front non-refundable one-time fee. The exclusive license granted thereunder has an initial term expiring on June 30, 2014, unless the Company and sanofi-aventis fail to agree upon the list of therapeutic areas that are exclusive to sanofi-aventis, in which event the exclusive license will have a term until June 29, 2012 for all therapeutic areas. If during the term of the exclusive license, sanofi-aventis has purchased the Unifill syringe for use with a particular drug product, sanofi-aventis will receive a ten-year extension of the term of the exclusive license, which extension will be reduced to five years if sanofi-aventis does not sell a minimum of 20,000 units of the product in any of the first five years of such ten-year extension period. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $2,456 of this up front payment as revenue and deferred $10,568 which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement.

F-29

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Under a related industrialization agreement, signed on June 30, 2009, sanofi-aventis has agreed to pay the Company up to 17,000 Euro ($23,400) in milestone-based payments to fund the completion of the Company’s industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. The industrialization program began in July 2008 and is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2010. The industrialization agreement requires sanofi-aventis to provide a list to the Company that specifies therapeutic drug classes for which it seeks to market the Unifill syringe on an exclusive basis. The Company and sanofi-avenits will then discuss the exclusivity list during a several month negotiation period, and if the list is agreed, sanofi-aventis will retain exclusive rights to the use of the product within these designated therapeutic drug classes until June 30, 2014, subject to the extension described above. If the Company and sanofi-aventis are unable to reach an agreement on the list, sanofi-aventis will retain full exclusivity across all therapeutic classes until July 1, 2012. Unless terminated earlier, the industrialization agreement has a term until the completion of the industrialization program. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $13,601 in revenue related to the milestones achieved under the industrialization agreement of which $7,024 was collected after year end.

14. Quarterly Results (unaudited)


	Quarter ended			Quarter ended			Quarter ended			Quarter ended
	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2008			March 31, 2009			June 30, 2009
Year ended June 30, 2009
Revenues	$	2,305		$	5,822		$	4,146		$	7,703
Gross profit		1,174			4,780			3,466			7,019
Net income (loss)		(1,616	)		(861	)		(271	)		2,231
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	0.07
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	0.07


	Quarter ended			Quarter ended			Quarter ended			Quarter ended
	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2007			March 31, 2008			June 30, 2008
Year ended June 30, 2008
Revenues	$	1,019		$	553		$	1,181		$	747
Gross profit		418			(204	)		396			434
Net loss		(1,767	)		(2,690	)		(1,648	)		(2,432	)
Basic loss per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.08	)
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.08	)

15. Subsequent Events

On September 1, 2009, UMSL announced that it entered into a Merger Implementation Agreement with the Unilife Corporation, pursuant to which shareholders and optionholders of UMSL will exchange their existing interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife Corporation and Unilife Corporation will become the parent, or ultimate parent of UMSL and its subsidiaries. Each holder of UMSL ordinary shares or share options will receive one share of common stock or one stock option, of Unilife Corporation for every six UMSL ordinary shares or share options, respectively, held by such holder, unless a holder of UMSL ordinary shares elects to receive, in lieu of common stock, Chess Depository Interests, or CDI’s (each representing one-sixth of a share of the Company’s common stock) of the Company, in which case such holder will receive one CDI of Unilife Corporation for each ordinary share of UMSL. All share and per share data has been retroactively restated to reflect the one for six share consolidation. The redomiciliation transaction is subject to various conditions, including without limitation, approval by the Australian Federal Court, approval by the shareholders and optionholders of UMSL, and a report by an independent expert concluding that the redomiciliation transaction is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the shareholders and optionholders.

F-30

Unilife Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

On October 8, 2009, UMSL issued 3,460,344 shares of common stock to a group of Australian and US investors in a private placement. As part of the private placement, UMSL will, subject to shareholder approval, issue an additional 2,831,191 shares of common stock and options to purchase 3,145,767 shares of common stock to the investors in the private placement. The shares of common stock were or will be issued at a price of A$5.10 per share for aggregate proceeds of A$32,086, of which A$14,439 is subject to shareholder approval and the options will be issued for no additional consideration. Each of the options will be exercisable within three years after the date of grant. Half of the options will have an exercise price of A$7.50 per share, and the other half of the options will have an exercise price of A$12.00 per share. In conjunction with the private placement, UMSL also provided its eligible Australian and New Zealand shareholders with an opportunity to purchase shares of common stock in a share purchase plan, at a price of A$5.10 per share, for a total consideration of up to A$10,000. In addition, UMSL will, subject to shareholder approval, issue options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock to certain advisors and brokers as compensation for their services with respect to the private placement and the share purchase plan. These options will be exercisable within three years after the date of grant at a price of A$5.10 per share. UMSL plans to seek the requisite shareholder approval at a shareholders meeting to be held in November 2009. The Company intends to use the proceeds raised from the private placement and the share purchase plan to accelerate the expansion of its operational capabilities, production facilities and equipment requirements in the United States, and complete the industrialization of the Unifill syringe. As part of its subsequent events re-evaluation through January 5, 2010, the Company notes that shareholder approval was obtained in November 2009 and the Australian and New Zealand shareholders actually acquired A$21,500 (unaudited) under the share purchase plan.

While the private placement was conducted by UMSL prior to the redomiciliation, all of the share numbers and share option exercise prices referred to above give effect to the share consolidation the Company will effect in connection with the redomiciliation (one share of the Company’s common stock equals six ordinary shares of UMSL). The ordinary shares and share options issued in the placement will be exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock and options to purchase its common stock in connection with the redomiciliation.

During October 2009, the Company accepted a $5,200 offer of assistance from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The offer includes $2,000 for the development of the Company’s new global headquarters and manufacturing facility as well as up to $2,000 in low interest financing loans for land, building, acquisition and construction costs. The offer also includes a $500 opportunity grant, as well as $500 in tax credits. Finally, the offer includes up to $200 for the reimbursement of eligible job training costs. The offer is based on the Company’s proposed project being expected to create more than 200 new full-time jobs by December 31, 2012, to retain the Company’s 97 existing employees and to have a total cost of $86,000 and is contingent upon the Company submitting complete applications and meeting all program guidelines. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to receive any or all of the assistance for the Company’s current development project or otherwise.

F-31

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number			Description
	2.1		Amended and Restated Merger Implementation Agreement dated as of September 1, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Unilife Corporation +

	2.2		Share Purchase Agreement among Unilife Medical Solutions Limited, Edward Paukovits, Jr., Keith Bocchicchio, and Daniel Adlon dated as of October 25, 2006 and amended as of September 26, 2007+

	3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of Unilife Corporation**

	3.2		Bylaws of Unilife Corporation**

	4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate**

	10.1		Exclusive Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie**

	10.2	*	First Amendment dated as of June 29, 2009 to Exclusive Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie**

	10.3	*	Industrialization Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie

	10.4		Business Lease, dated as of August 17, 2005, between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and AMC Delancey Heartland Partners, L.P.**

	10.5		Agreement dated as of September 15, 2003 between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and B. Braun Medical, Inc. and amendments thereto

	10.6		Promissory Note, dated as of December 30, 2005 between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and Commerce Bank**

	10.7		Promissory Note, dated as of August 25, 2006 between Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and Commerce Bank**

	10.8		Employment Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2008 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Alan Shortall**

	10.9		Employment Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2005 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Jeff Carter**

	10.10		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Daniel Calvert**

	10.11		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Bernhard Opitz**

	10.12		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Mark Iampietro**

	10.13		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Stephen Allan**

	10.14		Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Eugene Shortall**

	10.15		Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Joblak Pty Ltd**

	10.16		Deed of Mutual Release, dated January 12, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Jeff Carter**

	10.17		Unilife Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan**

	10.18		Unilife Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan**

	10.19		Unilife Medical Solutions Limited Exempt Employee Share Plan**

	10.20	*	Agreement dated November 12, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Mikron Assembly Technology

	10.21		Purchase and Mutual Indemnification Agreement dated November 16, 2009 between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Greenspring Partners, LP

	10.22		Offer of assistance dated October 16, 2009 from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Unilife Medical Solutions and acceptance of the offer

	10.23		Agreement Between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and L2 Architecture dated as of December 29, 2009, as amended

	10.24		Agreement between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and HSC Builders & Construction Managers dated as of December 14, 2009, as amended

	10.25		Development Agreement, dated December 14, 2009 between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Keystone Redevelopment Group LLC

	10.26		Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated December 14, 2009 of Unilife Cross Farm LLC

	10.27		Form of Share Purchase Agreement between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and each of the US investors in the October and November 2009 private placement

	10.28		Form of Subscription Agreement between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and each of the Australian investors in the October and November 2009 private placement

	10.29		2009 Share Purchase Plan Terms and Conditions

	21		List of subsidiaries of Unilife Corporation


+		The annexures, schedules and exhibits to this exhibit have been omitted. A copy of any omitted annexure, schedule or exhibit will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission supplementally upon request.

*		Confidential treatment has been requested for certain provisions of this Exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

**		Previously filed.


Delaware		27-1049354

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


633 Lowther Road, Lewisberry, Pennsylvania		17339

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Title of each class to be so registered		Name of each exchange on which each class is to be registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o


	Page
Item 1. Business		4

Item 1A. Risk Factors		14

Item 2. Financial Information		23

Item 3. Properties		31

Item 4. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		31

Item 5. Directors and Executive Officers		33

Item 6. Executive Compensation		34

Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		55

Item 8. Legal Proceedings		55

Item 9. Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters		55

Item 10. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities		57

Item 11. Description of Registrant’s Securities to be Registered		59

Item 12. Indemnification of Directors and Officers		61

Item 13. Financial Statement and Supplementary Data		61

Item 14. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		61

Item 15. Financial Statements and Exhibits		61

Exhibit 2.1
Exhibit 2.2
Exhibit 10.3
Exhibit 10.5
Exhibit 10.20
Exhibit 10.21
Exhibit 10.22
Exhibit 10.23
Exhibit 10.24
Exhibit 10.25
Exhibit 10.26
Exhibit 10.27
Exhibit 10.28
Exhibit 10.29
Exhibit 21


Item 11.		Description of Registrant’s Securities to be Registered


	Unilife Corporation
Date: January 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Alan Shortall
		Name:	Alan Shortall
		Title:	Chief Executive Officer


	Page
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009		F-2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008		F-3

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended September 30, 2009		F-4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008		F-5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-13

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and 2008		F-14

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-15

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-16

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-17

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-18


	September 30, 2009			June 30, 2009
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,046		$	3,627
Accounts receivable		2,515			7,333
Inventories		1,613			1,097
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		322			223

Total current assets		8,496			12,280
Property, plant and equipment, net		10,867			9,137
Goodwill		10,990			10,235
Intangible assets, net		46			43
Other assets		314			517

Total assets	$	30,713		$	32,212


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	567		$	1,103
Accrued expenses		5,803			6,097
Current portion of long-term debt		405			405
Deferred revenue		2,866			2,642

Total current liabilities		9,641			10,247
Long-term debt, less current portion		2,586			2,728
Deferred revenue		7,880			7,926

Total liabilities		20,107			20,901


Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2009; none issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2009; 37,010,802 and 36,625,802 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively		370			366
Additional paid-in-capital		59,041			57,987
Accumulated deficit		(51,966	)		(49,902	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,161			2,860

Total stockholders’ equity		10,606			11,311

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	30,713		$	32,212


										Accumulated
					Additional-					Other
	Common Stock				Paid-In		Accumulated			Comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Income (Loss)		Total
Balance as of July 1, 2009		36,625,802	$	366	$	57,987	$	(49,902	)	$	2,860	$	11,311
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—		—		—		(2,064	)		—		(2,064	)
Foreign currency translation		—		—		—		—			301		301

Comprehensive loss													(1,763	)
Share-based compensation expense		—		—		570		—			—		570
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		385,000		4		484		—			—		488

Balance as of September 30, 2009		37,010,802	$	370	$	59,041	$	(51,966	)	$	3,161	$	10,606