Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Loss Contingency [Abstract]
Contingencies	Note 12 - Contingencies Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company may be involved in various litigation matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. There is currently no litigation that management believes will have a material impact on the financial position of the Company. On June 10, 2016, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Waterford Group LLC (“Waterford”) pursuant to which the Company engaged Waterford to provide sales and marketing consulting and advisory services to the Company in consideration of 100,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the “Shares”) and a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”) to acquire 750,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $2.25 per share for a period of five (5) years. 50,000 of the Shares were issued to Waterford upon the execution of the Agreement. The Warrant vested on a quarterly basis in eight (8) equal quarterly installments each in the amount of 93,750 shares each quarter during the term of the Agreement. The first quarterly installment vested upon the execution of the Agreement and each subsequent quarterly installment was to vest each quarter thereafter. The Company believes that Waterford is in default of its agreement, as it failed to perform or provide any services under the agreement. As such, the Company put Waterford on notice in writing that the Company did not issue shares or warrants during the third or fourth fiscal quarters of 2016 due to the default. On or around January 23, 2017, the Company filed a complaint against Waterford and the Company’s Transfer Agent, in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside. On February 1, 2017, the Company obtained a temporary restraining order that prohibits Waterford from (x) lifting the restricted legend from the 50,000 shares that it received in connection with signing the Agreement; (y) selling the 50,000 shares to another party; and, (z) from exercising the warrant on 93,750 shares that was issued and vested upon the execution of the Agreement. As ordered by the court, on February 9, 2017, the Company deposited a Corporate Surety Bond in the amount of $42,875 to secure the temporary restraining order. The Company agreed with Waterford to go to binding arbitration, which is currently being scheduled. On or around February 27, 2017, the Company was issued a stay of the temporary restraining order barring its transfer agent from providing shares in connection with the exercise of the first Waterford warrant on 93,750 shares that was provided to Waterford in connection with the execution of the engagement letter that was executed by the parties on or around June 10, 2016. The matter is currently in arbitration. On or around April 10, 2017, the Company was billed by its transfer agent (“TA”) for approximately $11,500 for legal fees (“TA Charges”) in connection with a lawsuit brought by one of the Company’s shareholders against the TA. The Company is not a named party in this litigation. The Company disputes the TA Charges, as the Company’s position is that the TA Charges are not covered under the indemnification section of the Company’s agreement with its TA. As the TA refused to provide further services, the Company paid the fees, and booked it as an expense in this quarter. This matter has been resolved amicably, and the Company continues its relationship with the TA. Spare CS, Inc. On January 14, 2018, the Company entered into an Initial Term Agreement (the “ITA”) with Spare CS Inc. (“Spare”), a Delaware corporation, pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire 50% of the equity of Spare. Spare is a mobile banking app that allows customers to access cash with no ATM, no debit or credit card, and no purchase required from participating merchants. As set forth in the ITA, the Company agreed to provide Spare with all needed operating costs and will fund $100,000 every three months until Spare has positive cash flow. The Company provided the initial $100,000 on January 16, 2018. D’Ontra Hughes, CEO of Spare, will continue as CEO for 24 months at a salary of $10,000 per month and all current management will remain in place for 12 months. In addition, the Company will issue Spare 1,500,000 shares of common stock and a common stock purchase warrant to acquire 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for a period of three years. The Company also agreed to place 1,500,000 shares of common stock in escrow as a limited form of price protection for six months. Although the Company considers the terms in the ITA to be binding, and the Company has provided an initial funding of $200,000 to Spare, the closing the transactions is subject to the completion of due diligence and drafting and execution of a definitive purchase agreements and related transaction documents. There is no guarantee that the parties will successfully negotiate and finalize a definitive purchase agreement, that the Board of Directors of each company will approve such agreement, or that the transaction set forth in the ITA will close.

Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Note 12 - Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various litigation matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. There is currently no litigation that management believes will have a material impact on the financial position of the Company.

On June 10, 2016, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Waterford Group LLC (“Waterford”) pursuant to which the Company engaged Waterford to provide sales and marketing consulting and advisory services to the Company in consideration of 100,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the “Shares”) and a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”) to acquire 750,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $2.25 per share for a period of five (5) years. 50,000 of the Shares were issued to Waterford upon the execution of the Agreement. The Warrant vested on a quarterly basis in eight (8) equal quarterly installments each in the amount of 93,750 shares each quarter during the term of the Agreement. The first quarterly installment vested upon the execution of the Agreement and each subsequent quarterly installment was to vest each quarter thereafter. The Company believes that Waterford is in default of its agreement, as it failed to perform or provide any services under the agreement. As such, the Company put Waterford on notice in writing that the Company did not issue shares or warrants during the third or fourth fiscal quarters of 2016 due to the default.

On or around January 23, 2017, the Company filed a complaint against Waterford and the Company’s Transfer Agent, in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside. On February 1, 2017, the Company obtained a temporary restraining order that prohibits Waterford from (x) lifting the restricted legend from the 50,000 shares that it received in connection with signing the Agreement; (y) selling the 50,000 shares to another party; and, (z) from exercising the warrant on 93,750 shares that was issued and vested upon the execution of the Agreement. As ordered by the court, on February 9, 2017, the Company deposited a Corporate Surety Bond in the amount of $42,875 to secure the temporary restraining order. The Company agreed with Waterford to go to binding arbitration, which is currently being scheduled.

On or around February 27, 2017, the Company was issued a stay of the temporary restraining order barring its transfer agent from providing shares in connection with the exercise of the first Waterford warrant on 93,750 shares that was provided to Waterford in connection with the execution of the engagement letter that was executed by the parties on or around June 10, 2016. The matter is currently in arbitration.

On or around April 10, 2017, the Company was billed by its transfer agent (“TA”) for approximately $11,500 for legal fees (“TA Charges”) in connection with a lawsuit brought by one of the Company’s shareholders against the TA. The Company is not a named party in this litigation. The Company disputes the TA Charges, as the Company’s position is that the TA Charges are not covered under the indemnification section of the Company’s agreement with its TA. As the TA refused to provide further services, the Company paid the fees, and booked it as an expense in this quarter. This matter has been resolved amicably, and the Company continues its relationship with the TA.

Spare CS, Inc.

On January 14, 2018, the Company entered into an Initial Term Agreement (the “ITA”) with Spare CS Inc. (“Spare”), a Delaware corporation, pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire 50% of the equity of Spare. Spare is a mobile banking app that allows customers to access cash with no ATM, no debit or credit card, and no purchase required from participating merchants.

As set forth in the ITA, the Company agreed to provide Spare with all needed operating costs and will fund $100,000 every three months until Spare has positive cash flow. The Company provided the initial $100,000 on January 16, 2018. D’Ontra Hughes, CEO of Spare, will continue as CEO for 24 months at a salary of $10,000 per month and all current management will remain in place for 12 months. In addition, the Company will issue Spare 1,500,000 shares of common stock and a common stock purchase warrant to acquire 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for a period of three years. The Company also agreed to place 1,500,000 shares of common stock in escrow as a limited form of price protection for six months.

Although the Company considers the terms in the ITA to be binding, and the Company has provided an initial funding of $200,000 to Spare, the closing the transactions is subject to the completion of due diligence and drafting and execution of a definitive purchase agreements and related transaction documents. There is no guarantee that the parties will successfully negotiate and finalize a definitive purchase agreement, that the Board of Directors of each company will approve such agreement, or that the transaction set forth in the ITA will close.