10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

______________________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

______________________________________________________

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-54673

______________________________________________________

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

______________________________________________________

Maryland	27-0668930
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
800 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700 Newport Beach, California	92660
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(949) 417-6500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  xNo  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer	¨	Accelerated Filer	¨
Non-Accelerated Filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    

Yes  ¨  No  x

As of November 4, 2016, there were 20,848,950 outstanding shares of common stock of the registrant.

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2016

INDEX

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		2
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015	2
		Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015	3
		Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)	4
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015	5
		Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2016 (unaudited)	6
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	30
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION		31
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	31
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	31
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	33
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	33
	Item 5.	Other Information	33
	Item 6.	Exhibits	34
SIGNATURES			35

1

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(unaudited)
Assets
Real estate:
Land	$	46,828		$	46,828
Buildings and improvements	366,490			365,219
Total real estate, cost	413,318			412,047
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(44,592		)	(35,713		)
Total real estate, net	368,726			376,334
Cash and cash equivalents	16,906			20,193
Restricted cash	4,384			4,676
Prepaid expenses and other assets	4,982			4,976
Total assets	$	394,998		$	406,179
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Notes payable, net	$	280,509		$	284,488
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	5,185			5,236
Due to affiliates	279			4,894
Distributions payable	1,109			1,133
Other liabilities	2,735			2,163
Total liabilities	289,817			297,914
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Redeemable common stock	411			894
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 20,751,787 and 20,508,397 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	207			205
Additional paid-in capital	178,786			176,476
Cumulative distributions and net losses	(74,223		)	(69,310		)
Total stockholders’ equity	104,770			107,371
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	394,998		$	406,179

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Revenues:
Rental income	$	11,498	$	11,330	$	34,019	$	33,570
Total revenues	11,498		11,330		34,019		33,570
Expenses:
Operating, maintenance, and management	1,671		1,915		4,854		6,914
Real estate taxes and insurance	1,797		1,487		5,248		4,509
Asset management fees to affiliate	104		144		343		687
Property management fees and expenses to affiliate	1,506		1,368		4,359		2,136
General and administrative expenses	473		485		1,947		1,697
Depreciation and amortization	3,084		3,036		9,201		9,056
Interest expense	2,588		2,636		7,758		7,879
Total expenses	11,223		11,071		33,710		32,878
Other income:
Interest income	13		4		41		13
Other income	4,752		—		4,752		—
Net income	$	5,040	$	263	$	5,102	$	705
Net income per common share, basic and diluted	$	0.24	$	0.01	$	0.25	$	0.03
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	20,718,265		20,322,618		20,601,992		20,206,023

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

						Additional Paid-in Capital			Cumulative Distributions and Net Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock
	Shares		Amounts
Balance, December 31, 2014	20,084,830		$	201		$	172,448		$	(56,925	)	$	115,724
Issuance of common stock	595,095		6			5,730			—			5,736
Redemptions of common stock	(171,528	)	(2		)	(1,695		)	—			(1,697		)
Distributions declared	—		—			—			(13,176		)	(13,176		)
Other offering costs	—		—			(7		)	—			(7		)
Net income	—		—			—			791			791
Balance, December 31, 2015	20,508,397		205			176,476			(69,310		)	107,371
Issuance of common stock	442,104		4			4,320			—			4,324
Redemptions of common stock	(198,714	)	(2		)	(2,017		)	—			(2,019		)
Distributions declared	—		—			—			(10,015		)	(10,015		)
Other offering costs	—		—			7			—			7
Net income	—		—			—			5,102			5,102
Balance, September 30, 2016	20,751,787		$	207		$	178,786		$	(74,223	)	$	104,770

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	5,102		$	705
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	9,201			9,056
Bad debt expense	371			351
Loss due to property damages	145			78
Amortization of discount on notes payable	65			65
Amortization of deferred financing costs	311			311
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash for operational expenditures	292			310
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(709		)	(949		)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	159			(744		)
Due to affiliates	(4,615		)	261
Other liabilities	89			(24		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	10,411			9,420
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Improvements to real estate	(1,749		)	(1,745		)
Insurance proceeds received for property damage	133			397
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,616		)	(1,348		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable	(4,355		)	(4,141		)
Payments to redeem common stock	(2,019		)	(1,550		)
Other offering costs	7			(7		)
Distributions paid	(5,715		)	(5,546		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(12,082		)	(11,244		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(3,287		)	(3,172		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	20,193			23,878
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	16,906		$	20,706
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	$	7,413		$	7,534
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Transactions:
Distributions paid to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan	$	4,324		$	4,298
Increase in redeemable common stock payable	$	483		$	363

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION

KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on July 31, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through KBS Legacy Partners Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership formed on August 4, 2009. The Company is the sole general partner of and owns a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. KBS Legacy Partners Holdings LLC (“REIT Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on August 4, 2009, owns the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership and is its sole limited partner. The Company is the sole member and manager of REIT Holdings.

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is externally managed by KBS Capital Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to an advisory agreement the Company renewed with the Advisor on January 25, 2016 and amended on March 15, 2016 (as amended, the “Advisory Agreement”).

On August 7, 2009, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock to KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. As of September 30, 2016, the Sub-Advisor owned 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

The Company invested in and manages a portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States. The Company’s portfolio consists of “core” apartment buildings that were already well-positioned and producing rental income at acquisition. As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned 11 apartment complexes.

On August 19, 2009, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 280,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public (the “Initial Offering”), of which 80,000,000 shares would be offered pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement for the Initial Offering effective on March 12, 2010, and the Company retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Company, to serve as the dealer manager for the Initial Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated March 12, 2010 (the “Initial Dealer Manager Agreement”). Under the Initial Dealer Manager Agreement, the Dealer Manager was responsible for marketing the Company’s shares being offered pursuant to the Initial Offering.

On May 31, 2012, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a follow-on public offering (the “Follow-on Offering” and together with the Initial Offering, the “Offerings”). Pursuant to the registration statement, as amended, the Company registered up to an additional $2,000,000,000 of shares of common stock for sale to the public and up to an additional $760,000,000 of shares of common stock pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement for the Follow-on Offering effective on March 8, 2013.

The Company retained the Dealer Manager to serve as the dealer manager for the Follow-on Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated March 8, 2013 (the “Follow-on Dealer Manager Agreement” and together with the Initial Dealer Manager Agreement, the “Dealer Manager Agreements”). On March 12, 2013, the Company ceased offering shares pursuant to the Initial Offering and on March 13, 2013, the Company commenced offering shares to the public pursuant to the Follow-on Offering.

In the Initial Offering, the Company sold 18,088,084 shares of common stock for gross offering proceeds of $179.2 million, including 368,872 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $3.5 million. The Company ceased offering shares in the primary Follow-on Offering on March 31, 2014 and completed subscription processing procedures on April 30, 2014. The Company sold 1,496,198 shares of common stock in the primary Follow-on Offering for gross offering proceeds of $15.9 million.

6

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had sold an aggregate of 21,539,479 shares of common stock in the Offerings for gross offering proceeds of $214.5 million, including an aggregate of 2,324,069 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $23.0 million. Also, as of September 30, 2016, the Company had redeemed 807,692 shares sold in the Offerings for $7.9 million.

The Company continues to offer shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies since it filed its audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. For further information about the Company’s accounting policies, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings, the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the Company’s prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.  These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations of prior periods.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company entered into various Property Management Agreements (defined below) with Legacy Partners, Inc., formerly known as Legacy Partners Residential, Inc. (“LPI”), an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor.  See Note 6, “Related Party Transactions — Property Management Agreements.”  As a result, management fees to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the Company’s real estate properties, have been reclassified from operating, maintenance and management costs to property management fees and expenses to affiliate on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Segments

The Company had invested in 11 apartment complexes as of September 30, 2016. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue and net income is from real estate, and therefore, the Company currently operates in one reportable segment.

7

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

Square Footage, Occupancy and Other Measures

Any references to square footage or occupancy are unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s review of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Per Share Data

Basic net income per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income per share of common stock equals basic net income per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Distributions declared per common share were $0.164 and $0.486 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.164 and $0.486 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Distributions declared per common share assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, distributions were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day. Each day during the period from January 1, 2016 through February 28, 2016 and March 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 was a record date for distributions. Each day during the period from January 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015 was a record date for distributions.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU No. 2014-09”).  ASU No. 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.  ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  ASU No. 2014-09 does not apply to lease contracts within the scope of Leases (Topic 840). ASU No. 2014-09 was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU No. 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 on its financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU No. 2014-15”). The amendments in ASU No. 2014-15 require management to evaluate, for each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or are available to be issued when applicable) and, if so, provide related disclosures. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

8

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU No. 2016-01”).  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.  ASU No. 2016-01 primarily affects accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected.  ASU No. 2016-01 also requires entities to present financial assets and financial liabilities separately, grouped by measurement category and form of financial asset in the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”). The amendments in ASU No. 2016-02 change the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU No. 2016-15”).  ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-15 provide guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including the following that are or may be relevant to the Company: (a) Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities; (b) Cash payments relating to contingent consideration made soon after an acquisition’s consummation date (i.e., approximately three months or less) should be classified as cash outflows for investing activities. Payments made thereafter should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities up to the amount of the original contingent consideration liability. Payments made in excess of the amount of the original contingent consideration liability should be classified as cash outflows for operating activities; (c) Cash payments received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the nature of the loss (or each component loss, if an entity receives a lump-sum settlement); (d) In the absence of specific guidance, an entity should classify each separately identifiable cash source and use on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. For cash flows with aspects of more than one class that cannot be separated, the classification should be based on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flow.  ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-15 on its financial statements.

9

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

3. REAL ESTATE

As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned 11 apartment complexes, containing 3,039 units and encompassing 3.1 million rentable square feet, which were 94% occupied. The following table provides summary information regarding the properties owned by the Company as of September 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Property Name	Date Acquired	Location	Total Real Estate, Cost		Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization			Total Real Estate, Net
Legacy at Valley Ranch	10/26/2010	Irving, TX	$	36,485	$	(4,995	)	$	31,490
Poplar Creek	02/09/2012	Schaumburg, IL	27,200		(2,820		)	24,380
The Residence at Waterstone	04/06/2012	Pikesville, MD	65,270		(7,376		)	57,894
Legacy Crescent Park	05/03/2012	Greer, SC	20,714		(2,763		)	17,951
Legacy at Martin’s Point	05/31/2012	Lombard, IL	37,487		(5,198		)	32,289
Wesley Village	11/06/2012	Charlotte, NC	44,433		(4,659		)	39,774
Watertower Apartments	01/15/2013	Eden Prairie, MN	38,722		(4,020		)	34,702
Crystal Park at Waterford	05/08/2013	Frederick, MD	46,050		(4,758		)	41,292
Millennium Apartment Homes	06/07/2013	Greenville, SC	33,276		(3,376		)	29,900
Legacy Grand at Concord	02/18/2014	Concord, NC	27,855		(2,143		)	25,712
Lofts at the Highlands	02/25/2014	St. Louis, MO	35,826		(2,484		)	33,342
			$	413,318	$	(44,592	)	$	368,726

Additionally, as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had recorded unamortized tax abatement intangible assets, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying balance sheets, of $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded amortization expense of $65,000 and $0.2 million, respectively, related to tax abatement intangible assets. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded amortization expense of $65,000 and $0.2 million, respectively, related to tax abatement intangible assets.

Property Damage

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, one of the Company’s apartment complexes suffered physical damage due to frozen water pipes. The Company’s insurance policies provide coverage for property damage and business interruption subject to a deductible of up to $12,500 per incident.  The Company recognized a loss due to damage of $145,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was reduced by a $132,500 insurance recovery related to such damage. The net loss due to damage of $12,500 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was classified as operating, maintenance and management expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and relates to the Company’s insurance deductible.

10

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

4. NOTES PAYABLE

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s notes payable consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Book Value as of September 30, 2016			Book Value as of December 31, 2015			Contractual Interest Rate as of September 30, 2016	Payment Type	Maturity Date
Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan	$	31,111		$	31,554		3.9%	Principal & Interest	04/01/2019
Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan	19,509			19,785			4.0%	Principal & Interest	03/01/2019
The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan	45,883			46,550			3.8%	Principal & Interest	05/01/2019
Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan	13,636			13,858			3.5%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2019
Legacy at Martin’s Point Mortgage Loan	21,984			22,330			3.3%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2019
Wesley Village Mortgage Loan	27,041			27,566			2.6%	Principal & Interest	12/01/2017
Watertower Mortgage Loan	24,091			24,525			2.5%	Principal & Interest	02/10/2018
Crystal Park Mortgage Loan	27,190			27,709			2.5%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2018
Millennium Mortgage Loan	20,317			20,689			2.7%	Principal & Interest	07/01/2018
Legacy Grand at Concord Mortgage Loan	22,468			22,693			4.1%	Principal & Interest	12/01/2050
Lofts at the Highlands Mortgage Loan	30,864			31,190			3.4%	Principal & Interest	08/01/2052
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$	284,094		$	288,449
Discount on note payable, net	(2,666		)	(2,731		)
Deferred financing costs, net	(919		)	(1,230		)
Total notes payable, net	$	280,509		$	284,488

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $2.6 million and $7.8 million of interest expense, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $2.6 million and $7.9 million of interest expense, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $0.1 million and $0.3 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $0.1 million and $0.3 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Also included in interest expense were $22,000 and $65,000 of amortization of the discount on a note payable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $22,000 and $65,000 of amortization of the discount on a note payable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company recorded interest payable of $0.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for the Company’s notes payable outstanding as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016	$	1,488
2017	32,196
2018	72,958
2019	126,682
2020	852
Thereafter	49,918
	$	284,094

11

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

5. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other non-financial and financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired long-lived assets). Fair value, as defined under GAAP, is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

• Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

• Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

Notes payable: The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.

The following were the face value, carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s notes payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable	$	284,094	$	280,509	$	290,036	$	288,449	$	284,488	$	284,160

Disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. Low levels of transaction volume for certain financial instruments have made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of value at a future date could be materially different.

12

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor and the Follow-on Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager. These agreements entitled the Advisor and/or the Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Follow-on Offering and entitle the Advisor to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the management of the Company’s real estate properties, among other services, as well as reimbursement of organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company, such as expenses related to the dividend reinvestment plan, and certain costs incurred by the Advisor in providing services to the Company, such as certain operating costs. The Company has also entered into a fee reimbursement agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which the Company agreed to reimburse the Dealer Manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering the Company’s participation in the DTCC Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of the Company’s investors serviced through the platform. The Advisor and Dealer Manager also serve as the advisor and dealer manager, respectively, for KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc.

On January 6, 2014, the Company, together with KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc., the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and other KBS-affiliated entities, entered into an errors and omissions and directors and officers liability insurance program where the lower tiers of such insurance coverage are shared. The cost of these lower tiers is allocated by the Advisor and its insurance broker among each of the various entities covered by the program, and is billed directly to each entity. The allocation of these shared coverage costs is proportionate to the pricing by the insurance marketplace for the first tiers of directors and officers liability coverage purchased individually by each REIT. The Advisor’s and the Dealer Manager’s portion of the shared lower tiers’ cost is proportionate to the respective entities’ prior cost for the errors and omissions insurance. In June 2015, KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. was added to the insurance program at terms similar to those described above. The insurance program was renewed and is effective through June 30, 2017.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, no other business transactions occurred between the Company and KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc.

13

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

Pursuant to the terms of these agreements and the property management agreements discussed below, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and any related amounts payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	Incurred								Payable as of
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
Expensed
Asset management fees (1)	$	104	$	144	$	343	$	687	$	49	$	4,752
Reimbursable operating expenses (2)	68		58		184		264		12		25
Property management fees and expenses (3)	1,506		1,368		4,359		2,136		218		117
	$	1,678	$	1,570	$	4,886	$	3,087	$	279	$	4,894

____________________

⁽¹⁾ See “Advisory Agreement – Asset Management Fee” below.

⁽²⁾ Reimbursable operating expenses primarily consist of marketing research costs and property site visit expenses incurred by the Sub-Advisor and internal audit personnel costs, accounting software and cybersecurity related expenses incurred by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. Beginning July 1, 2010, the Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These amounts totaled $48,000 and $44,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $123,000 and $92,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and were the only type of employee costs reimbursed under the Advisory Agreement through September 30, 2016. The Company does not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition to the amounts above, the Company reimburses the Advisor and Sub-Advisor for certain of the Company’s direct property operating costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor and Sub-Advisor on behalf of the Company.

⁽³⁾ Property management fees and expenses consist of property management fees paid to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the properties and through March 31, 2015, fees for account maintenance and bookkeeping services paid to Legacy Partners Residential, L.P., an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor (“LPR”), under the now-terminated account services agreements. See “— Property Management Agreements.”

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Advisor reimbursed the Company $28,000 for a property insurance rebate and $0.1 million for legal and professional fees, respectively. 

In connection with the Follow-on Offering, the Company’s sponsors agreed to provide additional indemnification to one of the participating broker-dealers.  The Company agreed to add supplemental coverage to its directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage to insure the sponsors’ obligations under this indemnification agreement in exchange for reimbursement by the sponsors to the Company for all costs, expenses and premiums related to this supplemental coverage.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Advisor incurred $61,000 for the costs of the supplemental coverage obtained by the Company.

Advisory Agreement - Asset Management Fee

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the asset management fee payable by the Company to the Advisor with respect to investments in real estate is a monthly fee equal to the lesser of one-twelfth of (i) 1.0% of the amount paid or allocated to fund the acquisition, development, construction or improvement of the property (whether at or subsequent to acquisition), including acquisition expenses and budgeted capital improvement costs (regardless of the level of debt used to finance the investment), and (ii) 2.0% of the amount paid or allocated to fund the acquisition, development, construction or improvement of the property (whether at or subsequent to acquisition), including acquisition expenses and budgeted capital improvement costs, less any debt used to finance the investment.

14

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

The Advisory Agreement defers the Company’s obligation to pay asset management fees, without interest, accruing from February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013. The Company will only be obligated to pay the Advisor such deferred amounts if and to the extent that the Company’s funds from operations, as such term is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and interpreted by the Company, as adjusted for the effects of straight-line rents and acquisition costs and expenses (“AFFO”) for the immediately preceding month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for record dates of such prior month (an “AFFO Surplus”). The amount of any AFFO Surplus in a given month shall be applied first to pay to the Advisor asset management fees currently due with respect to such month (including any that would otherwise have been deferred for that month in accordance with the Advisory Agreement) and then to pay asset management fees previously deferred by the Advisor in accordance with the Advisory Agreement that remain unpaid. The Company had accrued and deferred payment of $1.5 million of asset management fees for February 2013 through July 2013 under the Advisory Agreement, as the Company believed the payment of this amount to the Advisor was probable at the time it was recorded. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company reversed, as an increase to other income, the liabilities due to affiliates related to the $1.5 million of asset management fees for the period from February 2013 through July 2013 as the Company believes that the payment of this amount to the Advisor is remote.

In addition, the Advisory Agreement defers without interest under certain circumstances, the Company’s obligation to pay asset management fees accruing from August 1, 2013. Specifically, the Advisory Agreement defers the Company’s obligation to pay an asset management fee for any month in which the Company’s modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) in November 2010 and interpreted by the Company, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by the Company for record dates of that month. The Company remains obligated to pay the Advisor an asset management fee in any month in which the Company’s MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus is also deferred under the Advisory Agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will not be applied to pay asset management fee amounts previously deferred by the Advisor in accordance with the Advisory Agreement. The Company had accrued and deferred payment of $3.3 million of asset management fees for August 2013 through December 2014 under the Advisory Agreement, as the Company believed the payment of this amount to the Advisor was probable at the time it was recorded. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company reversed, as an increase to other income, the liabilities due to affiliates related to the $3.3 million of asset management fees for the period from August 2013 through December 2014 as the Company believes that the payment of this amount to the Advisor is remote.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $2.1 million of asset management fees. However, the Company only recorded $0.7 million pursuant to the limitations in the Advisory Agreement as noted above. The Company deferred but did not accrue the remaining $1.4 million of these asset management fees as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $2.2 million of asset management fees. However, the Company only recorded $0.3 million pursuant to the limitations in the Advisory Agreement as noted above. The Company deferred but did not accrue the remaining $1.9 million of these asset management fees as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future.

However, notwithstanding any of the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees shall be immediately due and payable at such time as the Company’s stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to the Company’s share redemption plan, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, non-compounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”). The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of the Company’s stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for the Advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.

15

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

Property Management Agreements

The Company, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (each, a “Property Owner”), has entered into property management agreements with LPI (each, a “Property Management Agreement”), pursuant to which LPI provides, among other services, general property management services, including bookkeeping and accounting services, construction management services and budgeting and business plans for the Company’s properties as follows:

Property Name	Effective Date	Management Fee Percentage
Watertower Apartments	04/07/2015	2.75%
Crystal Park at Waterford	04/14/2015	3.00%
The Residence at Waterstone	04/28/2015	3.00%
Lofts at the Highlands	05/05/2015	3.00%
Legacy at Martin’s Point	05/12/2015	3.00%
Poplar Creek	05/14/2015	3.00%
Wesley Village	05/19/2015	3.00%
Legacy Grand at Concord	05/21/2015	3.00%
Millennium Apartment Homes (1)	05/27/2015	3.00%
Legacy Crescent Park (1)	05/29/2015	3.00%
Legacy at Valley Ranch	06/09/2015	3.00%

____________________

⁽¹⁾ Under the Property Management Agreement, the Property Owner will pay LPI the Management Fee Percentage in an amount equal to the greater of (a) 3% of the Gross Monthly Collections (as defined in the Property Management Agreement) or (b) $4,000 per month.

Under the Property Management Agreements, each Property Owner pays LPI: (i) a monthly fee based on a percentage (as described in the table above, the “Management Fee Percentage”) of the Gross Monthly Collections (as defined in each Property Management Agreement), (ii) a construction supervision fee equal to a percentage of construction costs to the extent overseen by LPI and as further detailed in each Property Management Agreement, (iii) a leasing commission at a rate to be agreed upon between the Property Owner and LPI for retail leases executed that were procured or obtained by LPI, (iv) certain reimbursements if included in an approved capital budget and (v) certain reimbursements if included in the approved operating budget, including the reimbursement of the salaries and benefits for on-site personnel. Unless otherwise provided for in an approved operating budget, LPI is responsible for all expenses that it incurs in rendering services pursuant to each Property Management Agreement. Each Property Management Agreement has an initial term of one year and will continue thereafter on a month-to-month basis unless either party gives 30 days’ prior written notice of its desire to terminate the Property Management Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Property Owner may terminate each Property Management Agreement at any time without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice to LPI. The Property Owner may also terminate the Property Management Agreement with cause immediately upon notice to LPI and the expiration of any applicable cure period. LPI may terminate each Property Management Agreement at any time without cause upon prior written notice to the Property Owner which, depending upon the terms of the particular Property Management Agreement, requires either 30, 60 or 90 days prior written notice. LPI may terminate the Property Management Agreement for cause if a Property Owner commits any material default under the Property Management Agreement and the default continues for a period of 30 days after notice from LPI to a Property Owner for a default or, in the case of Watertower Apartments, Lofts at the Highlands, Wesley Village, Legacy Grand at Concord, Millennium Apartment Homes and Legacy Crescent Park, if a monetary default continues for a period of 10 days after notice of such monetary default.

The Management Fee Percentage and any other fees and reimbursements payable to LPI by the Property Owner under each Property Management Agreement are approximately equal to the applicable percentage and other fees and reimbursements payable to LPR by the Property Owner under the now-terminated account services agreements and to the prior third party management companies by the Property Owner under the now-terminated prior property management agreements.

16

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)

KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Economic Dependency

The Company is dependent on the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the management of the daily operations of the Company’s investment portfolio; the disposition of investments; and other general and administrative responsibilities. The Company is also dependent on LPI to provide the property management services under the Property Management Agreements. In the event that these companies are unable to provide any of the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Environmental

As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Although there can be no assurance, the Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s property, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the property could result in future environmental liabilities.

Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company may become party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is probable or reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, which would require accrual or disclosure of the contingency and possible range of loss. Additionally, the Company has not recorded any loss contingencies related to legal proceedings in which the potential loss is deemed to be remote.

8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.

Distributions Paid

On October 3, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $1.1 million, which related to distributions declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from September 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. On November 1, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $1.1 million, which related to distributions declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016.

Distributions Declared

On October 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016, which the Company expects to pay in December 2016. On November 10, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which the Company expects to pay in January 2017, and distributions based on daily record dates for the period from January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017, which the Company expects to pay in February 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day and equal a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.32% annualized rate based on the Company’s December 8, 2015 estimated value per share of $10.29.

17

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and, as required by context, KBS Legacy Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as the “Operating Partnership,” and to their subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.

The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:

• We are dependent on KBS Capital Advisors LLC (“KBS Capital Advisors”), our advisor, and our sub-advisor to manage our investments and to provide certain other services. We are dependent on Legacy Partners, Inc., formerly known as Legacy Partners Residential, Inc. (“LPI”), an affiliate of our sub-advisor, to provide property management services for our investments.

• All of our executive officers, some of our directors and other key real estate professionals are also officers, managers, directors, key professionals and/or holders of a controlling interest in our advisor, the sub-advisor, our dealer manager and other sponsor-affiliated entities. As a result, they face conflicts of interest, including significant conflicts created by our advisor’s compensation arrangements with us and other programs and investors advised by our sponsors. Fees paid to our advisor in connection with the management of our properties are based on the cost of the property, not on the quality of the services rendered to us. This arrangement could result in unanticipated actions.

• We did not raise the maximum offering amount in our public offerings. Because we raised substantially less than the maximum offering amount, we were not able to invest in as diverse a portfolio of real estate properties as we otherwise would and the value of an investment in us will vary more widely with the performance of specific assets. There is a greater risk that stockholders will lose money in their investment in us, as we have less diversity in our portfolio.

• We pay substantial fees to and expenses of our advisor and its affiliates and, in connection with our public offerings, we paid substantial fees to participating broker-dealers. These payments increase the risk that our stockholders will not earn a profit on their investment in us and increase the risk of loss to our stockholders.

• From time to time during our operational stage, we have used proceeds from financings to fund distributions. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds, which may constitute a return of capital. We have not established a limit on the amount of distributions that we may fund from sources other than from cash flows from operations.

• We may incur debt until our total liabilities would exceed 75% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves), and we may exceed this limit with the approval of the conflicts committee of our board of directors. To the extent financing in excess of this limit is available on attractive terms, our conflicts committee may approve debt such that our total liabilities would exceed this limit. High debt levels could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of an investment in us.

• Disruptions in the financial markets and uncertain economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and generate returns to stockholders.

• We depend on tenants for our revenue. Revenues from our real property investments could decrease due to a reduction in tenants (caused by factors including, but not limited to, tenant defaults or early termination or non-renewal of existing tenant leases) and/or lower rental rates, limiting our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

18

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

• During any calendar year, once we have redeemed $1.5 million of shares under our share redemption program, including shares redeemed in connection with a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability,” or “determination of incompetence” (both as defined in the share redemption program and together with redemptions in connection with a stockholder’s death, “special redemptions”), the remaining $0.5 million of the $2.0 million annual limit shall be reserved exclusively for special redemptions. In January 2016, we exhausted $1.5 million of funds available for redemptions for 2016 and in August 2016, we exhausted $0.5 million of funds available for special redemptions for 2016. Therefore, we have no funds available for redemptions for the remainder of 2016.

• Although the Special Committee (defined below) of our board of directors has engaged a financial advisor to explore the availability of strategic alternatives involving our company with the goal of providing liquidity options for our stockholders while preserving and maximizing overall returns on our investment portfolio, and although we have engaged Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. (“HFF”) to market our real estate properties for sale, we are not obligated to enter into any particular transaction or any transaction at all. Further, although we and HFF continue to market the assets in our portfolio for sale, there is no assurance that this process will result in stockholder liquidity, or provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds our estimated value per share. Neither we nor HFF undertakes any obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law. 

All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified herein, in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, all filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Overview

We were formed on July 31, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010 and intend to continue to operate in such a manner. We conduct our business primarily through our Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner.

We invested in and manage a portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States. Our portfolio consists of “core” apartment buildings that were already well-positioned and producing rental income at acquisition. As of September 30, 2016, we owned 11 apartment complexes.

As our advisor, KBS Capital Advisors is responsible for managing our day-to-day operations and our portfolio of real estate assets. Subject to the terms of the advisory agreement between KBS Capital Advisors and us, KBS Capital Advisors delegates certain advisory duties to a sub-advisor, KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”), which is a joint venture between KBS Capital Advisors and Legacy Partners Residential Realty LLC (“LPRR LLC”). Notwithstanding such delegation to the Sub-Advisor, KBS Capital Advisors retains ultimate responsibility for the performance of all the matters entrusted to it under the advisory agreement. KBS Capital Advisors made recommendations on all investments to our board of directors. A majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors acting through the conflicts committee, approved our investments. KBS Capital Advisors, either directly or through the Sub-Advisor, also provides asset-management, marketing, investor-relations and other administrative services on our behalf. LPI is the property manager for our real estate property investments. Our Sub-Advisor owns 20,000 shares of our common stock. We have no paid employees.

On March 12, 2010, we commenced our initial public offering of 280,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public, of which 80,000,000 shares were offered pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan (the “Initial Offering”). We retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (“KBS Capital Markets Group”), an affiliate of our advisor, to serve as the dealer manager for the Initial Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated March 12, 2010 (the “Initial Dealer Manager Agreement”).

On May 31, 2012, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a follow-on public offering (the “Follow-on Offering” and together with the Initial Offering, the “Offerings”). Pursuant to the Follow-on Offering registration statement, as amended, we registered up to an additional $2,000,000,000 of shares of common stock for sale to the public and up to an additional $760,000,000 of shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared our registration statement for the Follow-on Offering effective on March 8, 2013.

19

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

We retained KBS Capital Markets Group to serve as the dealer manager for the Follow-on Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated March 8, 2013 (the “Follow-on Dealer Manager Agreement” and together with the Initial Dealer Manager Agreement, the “Dealer Manager Agreements”). On March 12, 2013, we ceased offering shares pursuant to the Initial Offering and on March 13, 2013, we commenced offering shares to the public pursuant to the Follow-on Offering. We ceased offering shares of common stock in the primary Follow-on Offering on March 31, 2014 and completed subscription processing procedures on April 30, 2014. We continue to offer shares under our dividend reinvestment plan.

Through its completion on March 12, 2013, we sold 18,088,084 shares of common stock in the Initial Offering for gross offering proceeds of $179.2 million, including 368,872 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $3.5 million. We sold 1,496,198 shares of common stock in our primary Follow-on Offering for gross offering proceeds of $15.9 million.

As of September 30, 2016, we had sold an aggregate of 21,539,479 shares of common stock in the Offerings for gross offering proceeds of $214.5 million, including an aggregate of 2,324,069 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $23.0 million. Also, as of September 30, 2016, we had redeemed 807,692 shares sold in the Offerings for $7.9 million. We have used substantially all of the net proceeds from the primary Offerings to invest in and manage a portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States as described above.

Market Outlook ─ Multi-Family Real Estate and Finance Markets

The last recession, occurring from approximately 2008 - 2009, resulted in significant job losses, which had an adverse effect on multifamily real estate. Vacancies increased to record highs and rents decreased as owners sought to retain existing residents and attract new residents. Rising capitalization rates, in addition to declining rents, caused values to decline. In contrast, 2010 exhibited positive signs that multifamily real estate had begun a solid recovery. Vacancy declined, rents increased, and capitalization rates decreased. These positive trends continued throughout 2011 and into 2012. From the second quarter of 2012 through the third quarter of 2014, vacancy stabilized at approximately its equilibrium rate and, while rent growth moderated during 2013, it remained at an above average annual rate through 2014. Since the fourth quarter of 2014, vacancy has declined gradually and there has been renewed rent growth.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”), approximately 8.7 million jobs were lost in the U.S. from December 2007 through December 2009 as a result of the 2008 - 2009 recession. Since 2009, employment has increased by over 15.0 million jobs (through September 2016). The BLS also reported that the unemployment rate peaked in 2009 at 10.0% and was down to 6.7% by the end of 2013. The unemployment rate continued to decline in 2014 and 2015, ending the year at 5.6% and 5.0%, respectively. Since the end of 2015, the unemployment rate has been relatively stable, fluctuating around 5.0%.

Witten Advisors reported that apartment vacancies in the U.S. were 7.8% at the end of 2009 (“U.S. Apartment Markets Forecast,” Third Quarter 2016). Apartment vacancies declined steadily throughout 2010 and 2011, stabilizing at 5%, the approximate equilibrium vacancy rate, in the second half of 2012. The vacancy rate remained relatively stable from that time through the third quarter of 2014. However, by the end of 2015, the vacancy rate had declined further to 4.6%. As of the end of the second quarter of 2016, the vacancy rate was 4.2%. Witten Advisors also reported that effective rents for U.S. apartments were up by 2.0% and 4.2% in 2010 and 2011, respectively, in contrast to the decline in effective rents of 4.4% in 2009. Effective rents continued to grow in 2012 and 2013 at 3.9% and 3.5%, respectively, as compared to the long-term average growth rate of 2.7%. From the third quarter of 2014 through the first quarter of 2016, effective rent growth was on the rise, surpassing 4.0% (annualized) for six consecutive quarters. Rent growth during for the second quarter of 2016 was 4.2%.

Class A multifamily capitalization rates in the U.S. averaged 4.7% in the fourth quarter of 2007 (Witten Advisors: “U.S. Apartment Markets Forecast,” First Quarter 2016). Capitalization rates increased to 5.8% by the fourth quarter of 2009, reflecting the decline in Class A multifamily property values as a result of the 2008 recession. By the first quarter of 2011, the average Class A capitalization rate had declined to approximately 5.0%, where it remained through the third quarter of 2013. Class A multifamily capitalization rates declined modestly to 4.8% in the fourth quarter of 2013, and declined further to 4.4% as of the end of the second quarter of 2016.

20

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

In the medium- and long-term, we believe the prospects for multifamily real estate investment are promising. We expect several positive demographic trends, as noted below, will drive the demand for multifamily housing throughout this decade.

• U.S. population growth - The U.S. Census Bureau projects that the U.S. population will increase by approximately 37 million (12%) between 2008 and 2020, predominantly in the West and South.

• Immigration - Foreign-born renters represented 18.9% of all renters in 2010 (U.S. Census Bureau, “2010 American Community Survey”). According to the U.S. Census Bureau, immigration is expected to add about 1.4 million individuals per year to the U.S. population. This immigration-driven increase in population, when combined with the natural U.S. population increase, will increase the demand for all types of housing, including apartments, over the next decade.

• Echo Boom - The children of the Baby Boom generation, dubbed the Echo Boomers, will increase the prime rental age group, 20 to 34 year olds, increasing from 64 million in 2011 to 68 million through 2020, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

• Renter population forecast - According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s population projections (December 2014 release), the population of people aged 20 to 34 is expected to increase by 2 million between 2015 and 2020. This “prime renter age cohort” is growing to a large part due to the “Echo Boom,” or children of the Baby Boom generation. In addition, the population of people aged 55 to 69 is expected to increase by over 4 million between 2015 and 2020, growth driven by the Baby Boomers. These Baby Boomers generally have enough income to purchase a home, but are increasingly choosing to downsize and rent, preferring the conveniences of apartments, particularly those in urban infill locations.

• Housing Shift - An increasing number of people are choosing to rent, as opposed to own, their home. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of people that rent their housing in the United States has increased from 31.0% in fourth quarter 2005, to 37.1% at the end of the second quarter of 2016. This equates to approximately 6.7 million additional renter households in the United States, according to Witten Advisors, over that time period.

• Diminished supply - According to Witten Advisors (“U.S. Apartment Markets Forecast,” First Quarter 2016), multifamily rental construction starts in the U.S. averaged approximately 300,000 units per year for the decade ended December 2005. In comparison, starts were 104,200 units in 2010, a small increase over the 50-year low mark of 97,600 units started in 2009. From 2011 through 2014, rental construction starts in the United States grew from 147,000 to 313,000 units annually. Multifamily rental construction starts reached nearly 385,000 units for the twelve month period ending July 2016. Over the next few years (second half of 2016-2019), starts are expected to ease to 250,000-300,000 units per year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal demands for funds during the short and long-term are and will be for the payment of operating expenses, capital expenditures and general and administrative expenses; payments under debt obligations; redemptions of common stock; and payments of distributions to stockholders. To date, we have had four primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements:

• Proceeds from our now terminated primary Offerings; 

• Proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan;

• Debt financings; and

• Cash flow generated by our real estate investments.

We ceased offering shares of common stock in the primary Follow-on Offering on March 31, 2014. We plan to continue to offer shares under our dividend reinvestment plan until we have sold all $760,000,000 of shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. In some states, we will need to renew the registration statement annually or file a new registration statement to continue the dividend reinvestment plan offering. We may terminate our dividend reinvestment plan offering at any time.

21

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

As of September 30, 2016, we had sold an aggregate of 21,539,479 shares of common stock in the Offerings for gross offering proceeds of $214.5 million including an aggregate of 2,324,069 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $23.0 million. Also as of September 30, 2016, we had redeemed 807,692 shares sold in the Offerings for $7.9 million. As of March 31, 2014, we had invested substantially all of the proceeds from our now-terminated primary Offerings in real estate properties and do not anticipate making additional real estate acquisitions. We intend to use our cash on hand, cash flow generated by our real estate operations and proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan as our primary sources of immediate and long-term liquidity.

As of September 30, 2016, we owned 11 apartment complexes. Our real estate investments generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are reduced by operating expenditures, debt service payments, the payment of asset management and property management fees and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flows from operations from our real estate investments is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our properties, the net effective rental rates on our leases, the collectibility of rent and how well we manage our expenditures. As of September 30, 2016, our real estate property investments were 94% occupied.

As of September 30, 2016, our total debt outstanding was $284.1 million. We limit our total liabilities to 75% of the cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) of our tangible assets; however, we may exceed that limit if a majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of this limitation and we disclose such borrowing to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. As of September 30, 2016, our borrowings and other liabilities were approximately 65% of the cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) of our tangible assets.

We paid distributions to our stockholders during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 using cash flows from operations. We believe that our cash flows from operations, cash on hand and proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Operating expense reimbursements for the four fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2016 did not exceed the charter-imposed limitation.

On January 21, 2016, our board of directors formed a special committee (the “Special Committee”) composed of all of our independent directors to explore the availability of strategic alternatives involving our company with the goal of providing liquidity options for our stockholders while preserving and maximizing overall returns on our investment portfolio.  While we conduct this process, we remain 100% focused on managing our properties.

As part of the process of exploring strategic alternatives, on April 5, 2016, the Special Committee engaged Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. (“Stanger”) to act as our financial advisor and to assist us and the Special Committee with this process. Under the terms of the engagement, Stanger has provided various financial advisory services, as requested by the Special Committee as customary for an engagement in connection with exploring strategic alternatives. Subsequently, we engaged HFF to market our real estate properties for sale. We are not obligated to enter into any particular transaction or any transaction at all. Further, although we and HFF continue to market the assets in our portfolio for sale, there is no assurance that this process will result in stockholder liquidity, or provide a return to stockholders that equals or exceeds our estimated value per share.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

As of September 30, 2016, we owned 11 apartment complexes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $10.4 million. We expect our cash flows from operating activities to vary over time and do not anticipate making additional real estate acquisitions.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and consisted primarily of the following:

• $1.7 million of cash used for improvements to real estate; and

• $0.1 million of insurance proceeds received for property damage.

22

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and consisted primarily of the following:

• $5.7 million of net cash distributions, after giving effect to dividends reinvested by stockholders of $4.3 million;

• $4.4 million of principal payments on our mortgage notes payable; and

• $2.0 million of cash used for redemptions of common stock.

In addition to using our capital resources to meet our debt service obligations, for capital expenditures and for operating costs, we use our capital resources to make certain payments to our advisor. We paid our advisor fees in connection with the acquisition of our assets and pay our advisor fees in connection with the management of our assets and for certain costs incurred by our advisor in providing services to us. Among the fees payable to our advisor is an asset management fee.

Advisory Agreement - Asset Management Fee

Pursuant to the advisory agreement, the asset management fee payable by us to our advisor with respect to investments in real estate is a monthly fee equal to the lesser of one-twelfth of (i) 1.0% of the amount paid or allocated to fund the acquisition, development, construction or improvement of the property (whether at or subsequent to acquisition), including acquisition expenses and budgeted capital improvement costs (regardless of the level of debt used to finance the investment), and (ii) 2.0% of the amount paid or allocated to fund the acquisition, development, construction or improvement of the property (whether at or subsequent to acquisition), including acquisition expenses and budgeted capital improvement costs, less any debt used to finance the investment.

The advisory agreement defers our obligation to pay asset management fees, without interest, accruing from February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013. We will only be obligated to pay our advisor such deferred amounts if and to the extent that our funds from operations, as such term is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and interpreted by us, as adjusted for the effects of straight-line rents and acquisition costs and expenses (“AFFO”) for the immediately preceding month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for record dates of such prior month (an “AFFO Surplus”). The amount of any AFFO Surplus in a given month shall be applied first to pay our advisor’s asset management fees currently due with respect to such month (including any that would otherwise have been deferred for that month in accordance with the advisory agreement) and then to pay asset management fees previously deferred by our advisor in accordance with the advisory agreement that remain unpaid. We had accrued and deferred payment of $1.5 million of asset management fees for February 2013 through July 2013 under the advisory agreement, as we believed the payment of this amount to our advisor was probable at the time it was recorded. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we reversed, as an increase to other income, the liabilities due to affiliates related to the $1.5 million of asset management fees for February 2013 through July 2013 as we believe that the payment of this amount to our advisor is remote.

In addition, the advisory agreement defers without interest under certain circumstances, our obligation to pay asset management fees accruing from August 1, 2013. Specifically, the advisory agreement defers our obligation to pay an asset management fee for any month in which our modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) in November 2010 and interpreted by us, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by us for record dates of that month. We remain obligated to pay our advisor an asset management fee in any month in which our MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus is also deferred under the advisory agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will not be applied to pay asset management fee amounts previously deferred by our advisor in accordance with the advisory agreement.

We had accrued and deferred payment of $3.3 million of asset management fees for August 2013 through December 2014 under the advisory agreement, as we believed the payment of this amount to our advisor was probable at the time it was recorded. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we reversed, as an increase to other income, the liabilities due to affiliates related to the $3.3 million of asset management fees for August 2013 through December 2014 as we believe that the payment of this amount to our advisor is remote. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred $2.2 million of asset management fees. However, we only recorded $0.3 million pursuant to the limitations in the advisory agreement as noted above. We did not accrue the remaining $1.9 million of these asset management fees as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future.

23

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

However, notwithstanding any of the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees shall be immediately due and payable at such time as our stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to our share redemption plan, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, non-compounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”). The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of our stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for our advisor to receive deferred asset management fees. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we reversed, as described above, an aggregate of $4.8 million of deferred asset management fees that were previously accrued. We believe the payment of the deferred asset management fees is remote based on the estimated value per share and management’s current projection of cash flow and distributions to our stockholders.

Contractual Commitments and Contingencies

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

			Payments Due During the Years Ending December 31,
Contractual Obligations	Total		Remainder of 2016		2017-2018		2019-2020		Thereafter
Outstanding debt obligations (1)	$	284,094	$	1,488	$	105,154	$	127,534	$	49,918
Interest payments on outstanding debt obligations (2)	58,490		2,373		16,877		5,578		33,662

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Amounts include principal payments only.

⁽²⁾ Projected interest payments are based on the outstanding principal amounts, maturity dates and interest rates in effect as of September 30, 2016. We incurred interest expense of $7.4 million, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and discount on a note payable of $0.4 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2016 versus the three months ended September 30, 2015

As of September 30, 2016, we owned 11 apartment complexes and did not make any acquisitions or dispositions during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
	2016		2015
Rental income	$	11,498	$	11,330	$	168		1	%
Operating, maintenance, and management costs	1,671		1,915		(244		)	(13	)%
Real estate taxes and insurance	1,797		1,487		310			21	%
Asset management fees to affiliate	104		144		(40		)	(28	)%
Property management fees and expenses to affiliate	1,506		1,368		138			10	%
Depreciation and amortization expense	3,084		3,036		48			2	%
Interest expense	2,588		2,636		(48		)	(2	)%
Other income	4,752		—		4,752			100	%

Rental income increased from $11.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $11.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily as a result of an increase in rental rates. We expect rental income to vary in future periods depending on occupancy rates and rental rates of our real estate investments.

Operating, maintenance and management costs and real estate taxes and insurance increased from $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to property tax reassessments, offset by a decrease in on-site office expenses and repairs and maintenance costs. Operating, maintenance and management costs and real estate taxes and insurance may increase in future periods, as compared to historical periods as a result of inflation.

24

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Asset management fees to affiliate with respect to our real estate investments decreased from $144,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $104,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we incurred $0.7 million of asset management fees, of which $0.1 million was recorded based on certain payment limitations in the advisory agreement. The remaining $0.6 million of the asset management fees were deferred but not accrued as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred $0.7 million of asset management fees, of which $0.1 million was recorded based on certain payment limitations in the advisory agreement. The remaining $0.6 million of the asset management fees were deferred but not accrued as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future. For a discussion of the asset management fee payable by us to our advisor and the deferrals of the asset management fee, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Advisory Agreement — Asset Management Fee” herein.

Property management fees and expenses to affiliate increased from $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily related to higher reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses. We expect our property management fees and expenses to affiliate to increase in future periods as a result of inflation.

Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2016 of $4.8 million relates to the reversal of previously deferred and accrued asset management fees of $1.5 million for the period from February 2013 through July 2013 and $3.3 million for the period from August 2013 through December 2014 as we believe that the payment of these amounts are remote. We did not record any other income for the three months ended September 30, 2015. For a discussion of the asset management fee payable by us to our advisor and the deferrals of the asset management fee, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Advisory Agreement — Asset Management Fee” herein.

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2015

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
	2016		2015
Rental income	$	34,019	$	33,570	$	449		1	%
Operating, maintenance, and management costs	4,854		6,914		(2,060		)	(30	)%
Real estate taxes and insurance	5,248		4,509		739			16	%
Asset management fees to affiliate	343		687		(344		)	(50	)%
Property management fees and expenses to affiliate	4,359		2,136		2,223			104	%
General and administrative expenses	1,947		1,697		250			15	%
Depreciation and amortization expense	9,201		9,056		145			2	%
Interest expense	7,758		7,879		(121		)	(2	)%
Other income	4,752		—		4,752			100	%

Rental income increased from $33.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $34.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, primarily as a result of an increase in rental rates. We expect rental income to vary in future periods depending on occupancy rates and rental rates of our real estate investments.

Operating, maintenance and management costs and real estate taxes and insurance decreased from $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $10.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to a decrease in reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses and management fees to third-party property management companies as a result of the transition of all property management services to LPI during the second quarter of 2015, partially offset by an increase in general repair and maintenance costs and property tax expenses. Management fees to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the properties, are classified as property management fees and expenses to affiliate on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Operating, maintenance and management costs and real estate taxes and insurance may increase in future periods, as compared to historical periods as a result of inflation.

25

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Asset management fees to affiliate with respect to our real estate investments decreased from $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we incurred $2.1 million of asset management fees, of which $0.7 million was recorded based on certain payment limitations in the advisory agreement. The remaining $1.4 million of the asset management fees were deferred but not accrued as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred $2.2 million of asset management fees, of which $0.3 million was recorded based on certain payment limitations in the advisory agreement. The remaining $1.9 million of the asset management fees were deferred but not accrued as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future. For a discussion of the asset management fee payable by us to our advisor and the deferrals of the asset management fee, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Advisory Agreement — Asset Management Fee” herein.

Property management fees and expenses to affiliate increased from $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to the transition of all property management services to LPI during the second quarter of 2015. Prior to the transition, management fees, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the properties, were classified as operating, maintenance, and management costs. We expect our property management fees and expenses to affiliate to increase in future periods as a result of inflation.

General and administrative expenses increased from $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to legal fees and other professional fees related to the Special Committee’s engagement of Stanger to act as our financial advisor. See “ — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for our discussion on the engagement of Stanger.

Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $4.8 million relates to the reversal of previously deferred and accrued asset management fees of $1.5 million for the period from February 2013 through July 2013 and $3.3 million for the period from August 2013 through December 2014 as we believe that the payment of these amounts are remote. We did not record any other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. For a discussion of the asset management fee payable by us to our advisor and the deferrals of the asset management fee, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Advisory Agreement — Asset Management Fee” herein.

Funds from Operations, Modified Funds from Operations and Adjusted MFFO

We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. We compute FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition. FFO represents net income, excluding gains and losses from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), impairment losses on real estate assets, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We believe FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other REITs. However, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and provides a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities, and when compared year over year, FFO reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income or loss.

26

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Changes in accounting rules have resulted in a substantial increase in the number of non-operating and non-cash items included in the calculation of FFO. As a result, our management also uses MFFO as an indicator of our ongoing performance as well as our dividend sustainability. MFFO excludes from FFO: acquisition fees and expenses; adjustments related to contingent purchase price obligations; amounts relating to straight-line rents and amortization of above and below market intangible lease assets and liabilities; accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; amortization of closing costs relating to debt investments; impairments of real estate-related investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; and gains or losses included in net income for the extinguishment or sale of debt or hedges. We compute MFFO in accordance with the definition of MFFO included in the practice guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010 as interpreted by management. Our computation of MFFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not compute MFFO in accordance with the current IPA definition or that interpret the current IPA definition differently than we do.

In addition, our management uses an adjusted MFFO (“Adjusted MFFO”) as an indicator of our ongoing performance as well as our dividend sustainability. Adjusted MFFO provides an adjustment to MFFO to exclude other income, which management does not believe reflects the current operating performance of our investments and does not provide an indication of future operating performance.

We believe that MFFO and Adjusted MFFO are helpful as measures of ongoing operating performance because they exclude non-operating items included in FFO.  MFFO and Adjusted MFFO exclude non-cash items such as straight-line rental revenue.  Additionally, we believe that MFFO and Adjusted MFFO provide investors with supplemental performance information that is consistent with the performance indicators and analysis used by management, in addition to net income and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, to evaluate the sustainability of our operating performance.  MFFO and Adjusted MFFO provide comparability in evaluating the operating performance of our portfolio with other non-traded REITs which typically have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies.  MFFO, or an equivalent measure, is routinely reported by non-traded REITs, and we believe often used by analysts and investors for comparison purposes.  

FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO are non-GAAP financial measures and do not represent net income as defined by GAAP. Net income as defined by GAAP is the most relevant measure in determining our operating performance because FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO include adjustments that investors may deem subjective, such as adding back expenses such as depreciation and amortization and the other items described above. Accordingly, FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indicator of our current and historical operating performance. In addition, FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO do not represent cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an indication of our liquidity. We believe FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO, in addition to net income and cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP, are meaningful supplemental performance measures.

For the prior periods presented, MFFO adjustments consist of the exclusion of straight-line rent and the amortization of a discount on a note payable. We have excluded these items based on the following economic considerations:

• Adjustments for straight-line rent.  These are adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize contractual lease payments on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease.  We have excluded these adjustments in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the current economic impact of our in-place leases, while also providing investors with a useful supplemental metric that addresses core operating performance by removing rent we expect to receive in a future period or rent that was received in a prior period; and

• Amortization of a discount on a note payable.  Discounts on debt are amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest expense.  This application results in interest expense recognition that is different than the underlying contractual terms of the debt.  We have excluded the amortization of a discount in our calculation of MFFO to more appropriately reflect the economic impact of our debt as the amortization of a discount has no ongoing economic impact on our operations.  We believe excluding this item provides investors with a useful supplemental metric that directly addresses core operating performance.

27

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Our calculation of FFO, which we believe is consistent with the calculation of FFO as defined by NAREIT, is presented in the following table, along with our calculation of MFFO and Adjusted MFFO, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively (in thousands). No conclusions or comparisons should be made from the presentation of these periods.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
Net income	$	5,040		$	263	$	5,102		$	705
Depreciation of real estate assets	3,083			3,035		9,199			9,053
Amortization of lease-related costs	1			1		2			3
FFO	8,124			3,299		14,303			9,761
Straight-line rent	—			—		—			(20		)
Amortization of discount on note payable	22			22		65			65
MFFO	8,146			3,321		14,368			9,806
Reversal of accrued asset management fees (1)	(4,752		)	—		(4,752		)	—
Adjusted MFFO	$	3,394		$	3,321	$	9,616		$	9,806

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Relates to reversal of previously deferred and accrued asset management fees of $1.5 million for the period from February 2013 through July 2013 and $3.3 million for the period from August 2013 through December 2014 as we believe that the payment of these amounts is remote.

FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO may also be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO and MFFO, such as tenant improvements, building improvements and deferred leasing costs.

Distributions

From time to time during our operational stage, we may not be able to pay distributions solely from our cash flows from operations or FFO, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing and/or from proceeds from our Offerings. Distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows from operations were as follows for the first, second and third quarters of 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Distributions Declared (1)		Distribution Declared Per Share (1) (2)		Distributions Paid (3)						Cash Flows from Operations
Period					Cash		Reinvested		Total
First Quarter 2016	$	3,285	$	0.160	$	1,866	$	1,421	$	3,287	$	3,451
Second Quarter 2016	3,336		0.162		1,910		1,455		3,365		3,629
Third Quarter 2016	3,394		0.164		1,939		1,448		3,387		3,331
	$	10,015	$	0.486	$	5,715	$	4,324	$	10,039	$	10,411

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ Distributions for the periods from January 1, 2016 through February 28, 2016 and March 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 were based on daily record dates and were calculated at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day.

⁽²⁾ Assumes share was issued and outstanding each day during the period presented.

⁽³⁾ Distributions are paid on a monthly basis. In general, distributions for all record dates of a given month are paid on or about the first business day of the following month.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we paid aggregate distributions of $10.0 million, including $5.7 million of distributions paid in cash and $4.3 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $14.3 million and cash flows from operations was $10.4 million. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes net cash distributions and distributions reinvested by stockholders, with cash flows from operations. For the purposes of determining the source of our distributions paid, we assume first that we use cash flows from operations from the relevant periods to fund distribution payments. All non-operating expenses (including general and administrative expenses to the extent not covered by cash flows from operations), debt service and other obligations are assumed to be paid from our dividend reinvestment plan as permitted by our offering documents and loan agreements. See the reconciliation of FFO to net income above.

28

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

From inception through September 30, 2016, we paid aggregate distributions of $53.5 million, and our cumulative net loss for the same period was $19.8 million. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flows from operations, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced.

Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flows from operations and FFO (except with respect to distributions related to sales of our assets). However, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including those discussed under “Forward - Looking Statements,” “Market Outlook — Multi-Family Real Estate and Finance Markets” and “Results of Operations” herein, and the risks discussed in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” herein and in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC. Those factors include: the future operating performance of our investments in the existing real estate and financial environment and the level of participation in our dividend reinvestment plan. In the event our FFO and/or cash flows from operations decrease in the future, the level of our distributions may also decrease. In addition, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO and/or cash flows from operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated interim financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of our financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. A discussion of the accounting policies that management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2016.

Subsequent Events

We evaluate subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.

Distributions Paid

On October 3, 2016, we paid distributions of $1.1 million, which related to distributions declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from September 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. On November 1, 2016, we paid distributions of $1.1 million, which related to distributions declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016.

Distributions Declared

On October 11, 2016, our board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016, which we expect to pay in December 2016. On November 10, 2016, our board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which we expect to pay in January 2017, and distributions based on daily record dates for the period from January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017, which we expect to pay in February 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through our dividend reinvestment plan.

Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day and equal a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.32% annualized rate based on our December 8, 2015 estimated value per share of $10.29.

29

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and to fund the renovation and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and to fund our operations. Our profitability and the value of our investment portfolio may be adversely affected during any period as a result of interest rate changes. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. We may manage interest rate risk by maintaining a ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt such that floating rate exposure is kept at an acceptable level. In addition, we may utilize a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate caps, floors, and swap agreements, in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. If we use these types of derivatives to hedge the risk of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, we may be subject to certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position will reduce the funds available for the payment of distributions to our stockholders and that the losses may exceed the amount we invested in the instruments.

Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows in relation to our fixed rate debt unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. As of September 30, 2016, the fair value estimate of our fixed rate debt was $290.0 million and the outstanding principal balance of our fixed rate debt was $284.1 million. The fair value estimate of our fixed rate debt was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing rates we would expect to pay for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity if the loans were originated as of September 30, 2016. With respect to our fixed rate instruments, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our fixed rate instruments, would have a significant impact on our ongoing operations.

Conversely, to the extent we have any variable rate debt, movements in interest rates on variable rate debt would change our future earnings and cash flows but, generally, not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. However, changes in required risk premiums would result in changes in the fair value of variable rate instruments. As of September 30, 2016, we did not have any variable rate debt outstanding.

The weighted-average interest rate of our fixed rate debt as of September 30, 2016 was 3.3%. The weighted-average interest rate represents the actual interest rate in effect as of September 30, 2016.

For a discussion of the interest rate risks related to the current capital and credit markets, see the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

30

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Please see the risks discussed below, in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We have paid distributions from financings and expect that in the future we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flows from operations. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flows from operations, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced.

Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds or borrowings (both of which may constitute a return of capital). We have paid distributions from financings and expect that in the future we may not pay distributions solely from our cash flows from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing. We may also fund distributions from the sale of assets. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flows from operations, the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, to the extent distributions exceed cash flows from operations, a stockholder’s basis in our stock will be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize capital gain. There is no limit on the amount of distributions we may fund from sources other than from cash flows from operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, we paid aggregate distributions of $13.2 million, including $7.4 million of distributions paid in cash and $5.8 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. FFO for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $12.9 million and cash flows from operations was $12.9 million. We funded our total distributions paid for the year ended December 31, 2015, which includes cash distributions and dividends reinvested by stockholders, with $12.8 million of cash flows from operations (97%) and $0.4 million of cash on hand (3%). For the year ended December 31, 2015, FFO represented 98% of total distributions paid.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we paid aggregate distributions of $10.0 million, including $5.7 million of distributions paid in cash and $4.3 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. FFO for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $14.3 million and cash flows from operations was $10.4 million. We funded our total distributions paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 with cash flows from operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, FFO represented 142% of total distributions paid.

See Part I, Item II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations” and “Distributions” herein and in Part II, Item VII, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC.

We exhausted funds available for redemptions for the remainder of 2016 in August 2016.

Because of limitations on the dollar value of shares that may be redeemed under our share redemption program as described below, we exhausted funds available for ordinary redemptions for the remainder of 2016 in January 2016 and funds available for special redemptions for the remainder of 2016 in August 2016. As of September 30, 2016, we had a total of $1.6 million of outstanding and unfulfilled redemption requests recorded in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

31

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

a) During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

b) Not applicable.

c) We have a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances.

Pursuant to our share redemption program, there are several limitations on our ability to redeem shares:

• Unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a special redemption, we may not redeem shares until the stockholder has held his or her shares for one year.

• We may redeem only the number of shares that we could purchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year; provided that we may not redeem more than $2.0 million of shares in the aggregate during any calendar year. Furthermore, during any calendar year, once we have redeemed $1.5 million of shares under our share redemption program, including in connection with special redemptions, the remaining $0.5 million of the $2.0 million annual limit shall be reserved exclusively for shares being redeemed in connection with a special redemption. We exhausted the funds available for ordinary redemptions for the remainder of 2016 in January 2016 and funds available for special redemptions for the remainder of 2016 in August 2016. Notwithstanding anything contained in this paragraph to the contrary, we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide this notice by including such information (a) in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC or (b) in a separate mailing to our stockholders.

• During any calendar year, we may redeem no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year.

• We have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency.

Pursuant to our share redemption program, redemptions made in connection with a special redemption are made at a price per share equal to the most recent estimated value per share of our common stock as of the applicable redemption date. The price at which we redeem all other shares eligible for redemption is as follows:

• For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date;

• For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date;

• For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date; and

• For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of our most recent estimated value per share as of the applicable redemption date.

If we cannot redeem all shares presented for redemption in any month because of the limitations on redemptions set forth in our share redemption program, then we will honor redemption requests on a pro rata basis, except that if a pro rata redemption would result in a stockholder owning less than the minimum purchase requirement described in our currently effective, or the most recently effective, registration statement as such registration statement has been amended or supplemented, then we would redeem all of such stockholder’s shares.

Upon a transfer of shares, any pending redemption requests with respect to such transferred shares will be canceled as of the date we accept the transfer. Stockholders wishing us to continue to consider a redemption request related to any transferred shares must resubmit their redemption request.

32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (continued)

On December 8, 2015, our board of directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.29 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2015. We currently expect to utilize an independent valuation firm to update the estimated value per share in December 2016. For a full description of the assumptions and methodologies used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the estimated value per share, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 at Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Market Information.”

Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the program without stockholder approval upon 30 days’ notice, provided that we may increase or decrease the funding available for the redemption of shares pursuant to our share redemption program upon ten business days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide this notice by including such information (a) in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC or (b) in a separate mailing to our stockholders.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we funded redemptions under our share redemption program with the net proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan, and we redeemed shares pursuant to our share redemption program as follows:

Month	Total Number of Shares Redeemed (1)	Average Price Paid Per Share (2)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of the Share Redemption Program	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares Available That May Yet Be Redeemed Under the Share Redemption Program
January 2016	149,287	$	10.12	149,287	(3)
February 2016	6,000	10.29		6,000	(3)
March 2016 (4)	4,009	10.17		2,097	(3)
April 2016	10,932	10.29		10,932	(3)
May 2016	—	—		—	(3)
June 2016	4,235	10.29		4,235	(3)
July 2016	—	—		—	(3)
August 2016	24,251	10.29		24,251	(3)
September 2016	—	—		—	(3)
Total	198,714			196,802

_____________________

⁽¹⁾ We announced the adoption and commencement of the program on March 12, 2010. We announced amendments to the program on January 18, 2013 (which amendment became effective on February 17, 2013), on February 26, 2013 (which amendment became effective on March 28, 2013), on January 28, 2014 (which amendment became effective on February 27, 2014) and on October 17, 2014 (which amendment became effective on November 16, 2014).

⁽²⁾ The prices at which we redeem shares under our share redemption program are set forth above.

⁽³⁾ We limit the dollar value of shares that may be redeemed under our share redemption program as described above. In January 2016, we exhausted $1.5 million of funds available for redemptions for 2016. In August 2016, we exhausted $0.5 million of funds available for special redemptions for 2016. As of September 30, 2016, we had a total of $1.6 million of outstanding and unfulfilled redemption requests, representing 154,391 shares, recorded in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

⁽⁴⁾ In addition to the redemptions under our share redemption program described above, in March 2016, we repurchased 1,912 shares of our common stock at $10.03 per share for an aggregate price of $19,188.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

33

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Item 6. Exhibits

Ex.	Description
3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement as adopted on January 8, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed January 12, 2010
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed January 12, 2010
4.1	Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed October 2, 2009
4.2	Third Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, filed May 10, 2013
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1	Fifth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 17, 2014
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

34

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
Date:	November 10, 2016	By:	/s/ W. DEAN HENRY
			W. Dean Henry
			Chief Executive Officer
			(principal executive officer)
Date:	November 10, 2016	By:	/s/ JEFFREY K. WALDVOGEL
			Jeffrey K. Waldvogel
			Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
			(principal financial officer)

35

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Dean Henry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 10, 2016	By:	/S/ W. DEAN HENRY
			W. Dean Henry
			Chief Executive Officer
			(principal executive officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffrey K. Waldvogel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	November 10, 2016	By:	/S/ JEFFREY  K. WALDVOGEL
			Jeffrey K. Waldvogel
			Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer  and Secretary
			(principal financial officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, W. Dean Henry, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:	November 10, 2016	By:	/S/ W. DEAN HENRY
			W. Dean Henry
			Chief Executive Officer
			(principal executive officer)

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Jeffrey K. Waldvogel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:	November 10, 2016	By:	/S/ JEFFREY  K. WALDVOGEL
			Jeffrey K. Waldvogel
			Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer  and Secretary
			(principal financial officer)

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Nov. 04, 2016
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2016
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001469822
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		20,848,950

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Real estate:
Land	$ 46,828	$ 46,828
Buildings and improvements	366,490	365,219
Total real estate, cost	413,318	412,047
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(44,592)	(35,713)
Total real estate, net	368,726	376,334
Cash and cash equivalents	16,906	20,193
Restricted cash	4,384	4,676
Prepaid expenses and other assets	4,982	4,976
Total assets	394,998	406,179
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Notes payable, net	280,509	284,488
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	5,185	5,236
Due to affiliates	279	4,894
Distributions payable	1,109	1,133
Other liabilities	2,735	2,163
Total liabilities	289,817	297,914
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Redeemable common stock	411	894
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	0	0
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 20,751,787 and 20,508,397 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	207	205
Additional paid-in capital	178,786	176,476
Cumulative distributions and net losses	(74,223)	(69,310)
Total stockholders’ equity	104,770	107,371
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$ 394,998	$ 406,179

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	1,000,000,000	1,000,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	20,751,787	20,508,397
Common stock, shares outstanding	20,751,787	20,508,397

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Revenues:
Rental income	$ 11,498	$ 11,330	$ 34,019	$ 33,570
Total revenues	11,498	11,330	34,019	33,570
Expenses:
Operating, maintenance, and management	1,671	1,915	4,854	6,914
Real estate taxes and insurance	1,797	1,487	5,248	4,509
Asset management fees to affiliate	104	144	343	687
Property management fees and expenses to affiliate	1,506	1,368	4,359	2,136
General and administrative expenses	473	485	1,947	1,697
Depreciation and amortization	3,084	3,036	9,201	9,056
Interest expense	2,588	2,636	7,758	7,879
Total expenses	11,223	11,071	33,710	32,878
Other income:
Interest income	13	4	41	13
Other income	4,752	0	4,752	0
Net income	$ 5,040	$ 263	$ 5,102	$ 705
Net income per common share, basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.24	$ 0.01	$ 0.25	$ 0.03
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted (in shares)	20,718,265	20,322,618	20,601,992	20,206,023

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Cumulative Distributions and Net Income (Loss) [Member]
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2014		20,084,830
Balance, value at Dec. 31, 2014	$ 115,724	$ 201	$ 172,448	$ (56,925)
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Issuance of common stock, shares		595,095
Issuance of common stock, value	5,736	$ 6	5,730
Redemptions of common stock, shares		(171,528)
Redemptions of common stock, value	(1,697)	$ (2)	(1,695)
Distributions declared	(13,176)			(13,176)
Other offering costs	(7)		(7)
Net income	$ 791			791
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2015	20,508,397	20,508,397
Balance, value at Dec. 31, 2015	$ 107,371	$ 205	176,476	(69,310)
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Issuance of common stock, shares		442,104
Issuance of common stock, value	4,324	$ 4	4,320
Redemptions of common stock, shares		(198,714)
Redemptions of common stock, value	(2,019)	$ (2)	(2,017)
Distributions declared	(10,015)			(10,015)
Other offering costs	7		7
Net income	$ 5,102			5,102
Balance, shares at Sep. 30, 2016	20,751,787	20,751,787
Balance, value at Sep. 30, 2016	$ 104,770	$ 207	$ 178,786	$ (74,223)

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$ 5,102	$ 705
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	9,201	9,056
Bad debt expense	371	351
Loss due to property damages	145	78
Amortization of discount on notes payable	65	65
Amortization of deferred financing costs	311	311
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash for operational expenditures	292	310
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(709)	(949)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	159	(744)
Due to affiliates	(4,615)	261
Other liabilities	89	(24)
Net cash provided by operating activities	10,411	9,420
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Improvements to real estate	(1,749)	(1,745)
Insurance proceeds received for property damage	133	397
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,616)	(1,348)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable	(4,355)	(4,141)
Payments to redeem common stock	(2,019)	(1,550)
Other offering costs	7	(7)
Distributions paid	(5,715)	(5,546)
Net cash used in financing activities	(12,082)	(11,244)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(3,287)	(3,172)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	20,193	23,878
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	16,906	20,706
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	7,413	7,534
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Transactions:
Distributions paid to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan	4,324	4,298
Increase in redeemable common stock payable	$ 483	$ 363

XML

ORGANIZATION

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION

KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on July 31, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through KBS Legacy Partners Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership formed on August 4, 2009. The Company is the sole general partner of and owns a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. KBS Legacy Partners Holdings LLC (“REIT Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on August 4, 2009, owns the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership and is its sole limited partner. The Company is the sole member and manager of REIT Holdings.

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is externally managed by KBS Capital Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to an advisory agreement the Company renewed with the Advisor on January 25, 2016 and amended on March 15, 2016 (as amended, the “Advisory Agreement”).

On August 7, 2009, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock to KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. As of September 30, 2016, the Sub-Advisor owned 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

The Company invested in and manages a portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States. The Company’s portfolio consists of “core” apartment buildings that were already well-positioned and producing rental income at acquisition. As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned 11 apartment complexes.

On August 19, 2009, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 280,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public (the “Initial Offering”), of which 80,000,000 shares would be offered pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement for the Initial Offering effective on March 12, 2010, and the Company retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Company, to serve as the dealer manager for the Initial Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated March 12, 2010 (the “Initial Dealer Manager Agreement”). Under the Initial Dealer Manager Agreement, the Dealer Manager was responsible for marketing the Company’s shares being offered pursuant to the Initial Offering.

On May 31, 2012, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a follow-on public offering (the “Follow-on Offering” and together with the Initial Offering, the “Offerings”). Pursuant to the registration statement, as amended, the Company registered up to an additional $2,000,000,000 of shares of common stock for sale to the public and up to an additional $760,000,000 of shares of common stock pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement for the Follow-on Offering effective on March 8, 2013.

The Company retained the Dealer Manager to serve as the dealer manager for the Follow-on Offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement dated March 8, 2013 (the “Follow-on Dealer Manager Agreement” and together with the Initial Dealer Manager Agreement, the “Dealer Manager Agreements”). On March 12, 2013, the Company ceased offering shares pursuant to the Initial Offering and on March 13, 2013, the Company commenced offering shares to the public pursuant to the Follow-on Offering.

In the Initial Offering, the Company sold 18,088,084 shares of common stock for gross offering proceeds of $179.2 million, including 368,872 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $3.5 million. The Company ceased offering shares in the primary Follow-on Offering on March 31, 2014 and completed subscription processing procedures on April 30, 2014. The Company sold 1,496,198 shares of common stock in the primary Follow-on Offering for gross offering proceeds of $15.9 million.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company had sold an aggregate of 21,539,479 shares of common stock in the Offerings for gross offering proceeds of $214.5 million, including an aggregate of 2,324,069 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $23.0 million. Also, as of September 30, 2016, the Company had redeemed 807,692 shares sold in the Offerings for $7.9 million.

The Company continues to offer shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies since it filed its audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. For further information about the Company’s accounting policies, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings, the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the Company’s prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.  These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations of prior periods.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company entered into various Property Management Agreements (defined below) with Legacy Partners, Inc., formerly known as Legacy Partners Residential, Inc. (“LPI”), an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor.  See Note 6, “Related Party Transactions — Property Management Agreements.”  As a result, management fees to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the Company’s real estate properties, have been reclassified from operating, maintenance and management costs to property management fees and expenses to affiliate on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Segments

The Company had invested in 11 apartment complexes as of September 30, 2016. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue and net income is from real estate, and therefore, the Company currently operates in one reportable segment.

Square Footage, Occupancy and Other Measures

Any references to square footage or occupancy are unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s review of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Per Share Data

Basic net income per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income per share of common stock equals basic net income per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Distributions declared per common share were $0.164 and $0.486 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.164 and $0.486 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Distributions declared per common share assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, distributions were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day. Each day during the period from January 1, 2016 through February 28, 2016 and March 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 was a record date for distributions. Each day during the period from January 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015 was a record date for distributions.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU No. 2014-09”).  ASU No. 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.  ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  ASU No. 2014-09 does not apply to lease contracts within the scope of Leases (Topic 840). ASU No. 2014-09 was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU No. 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 on its financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU No. 2014-15”). The amendments in ASU No. 2014-15 require management to evaluate, for each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or are available to be issued when applicable) and, if so, provide related disclosures. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU No. 2016-01”).  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.  ASU No. 2016-01 primarily affects accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected.  ASU No. 2016-01 also requires entities to present financial assets and financial liabilities separately, grouped by measurement category and form of financial asset in the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”). The amendments in ASU No. 2016-02 change the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU No. 2016-15”).  ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-15 provide guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including the following that are or may be relevant to the Company: (a) Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities; (b) Cash payments relating to contingent consideration made soon after an acquisition’s consummation date (i.e., approximately three months or less) should be classified as cash outflows for investing activities. Payments made thereafter should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities up to the amount of the original contingent consideration liability. Payments made in excess of the amount of the original contingent consideration liability should be classified as cash outflows for operating activities; (c) Cash payments received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the nature of the loss (or each component loss, if an entity receives a lump-sum settlement); (d) In the absence of specific guidance, an entity should classify each separately identifiable cash source and use on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. For cash flows with aspects of more than one class that cannot be separated, the classification should be based on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flow.  ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-15 on its financial statements.

XML

REAL ESTATE

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Real Estate [Abstract]

REAL ESTATE

REAL ESTATE

As of September 30, 2016, the Company owned 11 apartment complexes, containing 3,039 units and encompassing 3.1 million rentable square feet, which were 94% occupied. The following table provides summary information regarding the properties owned by the Company as of September 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Property Name	Date Acquired	Location	Total Real Estate, Cost		Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization			Total Real Estate, Net
Legacy at Valley Ranch	10/26/2010	Irving, TX	$	36,485	$	(4,995	)	$	31,490
Poplar Creek	02/09/2012	Schaumburg, IL	27,200		(2,820		)	24,380
The Residence at Waterstone	04/06/2012	Pikesville, MD	65,270		(7,376		)	57,894
Legacy Crescent Park	05/03/2012	Greer, SC	20,714		(2,763		)	17,951
Legacy at Martin’s Point	05/31/2012	Lombard, IL	37,487		(5,198		)	32,289
Wesley Village	11/06/2012	Charlotte, NC	44,433		(4,659		)	39,774
Watertower Apartments	01/15/2013	Eden Prairie, MN	38,722		(4,020		)	34,702
Crystal Park at Waterford	05/08/2013	Frederick, MD	46,050		(4,758		)	41,292
Millennium Apartment Homes	06/07/2013	Greenville, SC	33,276		(3,376		)	29,900
Legacy Grand at Concord	02/18/2014	Concord, NC	27,855		(2,143		)	25,712
Lofts at the Highlands	02/25/2014	St. Louis, MO	35,826		(2,484		)	33,342
			$	413,318	$	(44,592	)	$	368,726

Additionally, as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had recorded unamortized tax abatement intangible assets, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying balance sheets, of $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded amortization expense of $65,000 and $0.2 million, respectively, related to tax abatement intangible assets. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded amortization expense of $65,000 and $0.2 million, respectively, related to tax abatement intangible assets.

Property Damage

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, one of the Company’s apartment complexes suffered physical damage due to frozen water pipes. The Company’s insurance policies provide coverage for property damage and business interruption subject to a deductible of up to $12,500 per incident.  The Company recognized a loss due to damage of $145,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was reduced by a $132,500 insurance recovery related to such damage. The net loss due to damage of $12,500 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was classified as operating, maintenance and management expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and relates to the Company’s insurance deductible.

XML

NOTES PAYABLE

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes Payable [Abstract]

NOTES PAYABLE

NOTES PAYABLE

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s notes payable consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Book Value as of September 30, 2016			Book Value as of December 31, 2015			Contractual Interest Rate as of September 30, 2016	Payment Type	Maturity Date
Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan	$	31,111		$	31,554		3.9%	Principal & Interest	04/01/2019
Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan	19,509			19,785			4.0%	Principal & Interest	03/01/2019
The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan	45,883			46,550			3.8%	Principal & Interest	05/01/2019
Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan	13,636			13,858			3.5%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2019
Legacy at Martin’s Point Mortgage Loan	21,984			22,330			3.3%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2019
Wesley Village Mortgage Loan	27,041			27,566			2.6%	Principal & Interest	12/01/2017
Watertower Mortgage Loan	24,091			24,525			2.5%	Principal & Interest	02/10/2018
Crystal Park Mortgage Loan	27,190			27,709			2.5%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2018
Millennium Mortgage Loan	20,317			20,689			2.7%	Principal & Interest	07/01/2018
Legacy Grand at Concord Mortgage Loan	22,468			22,693			4.1%	Principal & Interest	12/01/2050
Lofts at the Highlands Mortgage Loan	30,864			31,190			3.4%	Principal & Interest	08/01/2052
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$	284,094		$	288,449
Discount on note payable, net	(2,666		)	(2,731		)
Deferred financing costs, net	(919		)	(1,230		)
Total notes payable, net	$	280,509		$	284,488

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $2.6 million and $7.8 million of interest expense, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $2.6 million and $7.9 million of interest expense, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $0.1 million and $0.3 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $0.1 million and $0.3 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. Also included in interest expense were $22,000 and $65,000 of amortization of the discount on a note payable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $22,000 and $65,000 of amortization of the discount on a note payable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company recorded interest payable of $0.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for the Company’s notes payable outstanding as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016	$	1,488
2017	32,196
2018	72,958
2019	126,682
2020	852
Thereafter	49,918
	$	284,094

XML

FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other non-financial and financial assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired long-lived assets). Fair value, as defined under GAAP, is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

• Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

• Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

Notes payable: The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.

The following were the face value, carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s notes payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable	$	284,094	$	280,509	$	290,036	$	288,449	$	284,488	$	284,160

Disclosure of the fair values of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company as of the period end and requires a significant amount of judgment. Low levels of transaction volume for certain financial instruments have made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of value at a future date could be materially different.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor and the Follow-on Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager. These agreements entitled the Advisor and/or the Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Follow-on Offering and entitle the Advisor to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the management of the Company’s real estate properties, among other services, as well as reimbursement of organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company, such as expenses related to the dividend reinvestment plan, and certain costs incurred by the Advisor in providing services to the Company, such as certain operating costs. The Company has also entered into a fee reimbursement agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which the Company agreed to reimburse the Dealer Manager for certain fees and expenses it incurs for administering the Company’s participation in the DTCC Alternative Investment Product Platform with respect to certain accounts of the Company’s investors serviced through the platform. The Advisor and Dealer Manager also serve as the advisor and dealer manager, respectively, for KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc.

On January 6, 2014, the Company, together with KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc., the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and other KBS-affiliated entities, entered into an errors and omissions and directors and officers liability insurance program where the lower tiers of such insurance coverage are shared. The cost of these lower tiers is allocated by the Advisor and its insurance broker among each of the various entities covered by the program, and is billed directly to each entity. The allocation of these shared coverage costs is proportionate to the pricing by the insurance marketplace for the first tiers of directors and officers liability coverage purchased individually by each REIT. The Advisor’s and the Dealer Manager’s portion of the shared lower tiers’ cost is proportionate to the respective entities’ prior cost for the errors and omissions insurance. In June 2015, KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc. was added to the insurance program at terms similar to those described above. The insurance program was renewed and is effective through June 30, 2017.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, no other business transactions occurred between the Company and KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and KBS Growth & Income REIT, Inc.

Pursuant to the terms of these agreements and the property management agreements discussed below, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and any related amounts payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	Incurred								Payable as of
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
Expensed
Asset management fees (1)	$	104	$	144	$	343	$	687	$	49	$	4,752
Reimbursable operating expenses (2)	68		58		184		264		12		25
Property management fees and expenses (3)	1,506		1,368		4,359		2,136		218		117
	$	1,678	$	1,570	$	4,886	$	3,087	$	279	$	4,894

____________________

⁽¹⁾ See “Advisory Agreement – Asset Management Fee” below.

⁽²⁾ Reimbursable operating expenses primarily consist of marketing research costs and property site visit expenses incurred by the Sub-Advisor and internal audit personnel costs, accounting software and cybersecurity related expenses incurred by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. Beginning July 1, 2010, the Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These amounts totaled $48,000 and $44,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $123,000 and $92,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and were the only type of employee costs reimbursed under the Advisory Agreement through September 30, 2016. The Company does not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition to the amounts above, the Company reimburses the Advisor and Sub-Advisor for certain of the Company’s direct property operating costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor and Sub-Advisor on behalf of the Company.

⁽³⁾ Property management fees and expenses consist of property management fees paid to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the properties and through March 31, 2015, fees for account maintenance and bookkeeping services paid to Legacy Partners Residential, L.P., an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor (“LPR”), under the now-terminated account services agreements. See “— Property Management Agreements.”

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Advisor reimbursed the Company $28,000 for a property insurance rebate and $0.1 million for legal and professional fees, respectively. 

In connection with the Follow-on Offering, the Company’s sponsors agreed to provide additional indemnification to one of the participating broker-dealers.  The Company agreed to add supplemental coverage to its directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage to insure the sponsors’ obligations under this indemnification agreement in exchange for reimbursement by the sponsors to the Company for all costs, expenses and premiums related to this supplemental coverage.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Advisor incurred $61,000 for the costs of the supplemental coverage obtained by the Company.

Advisory Agreement - Asset Management Fee

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the asset management fee payable by the Company to the Advisor with respect to investments in real estate is a monthly fee equal to the lesser of one-twelfth of (i) 1.0% of the amount paid or allocated to fund the acquisition, development, construction or improvement of the property (whether at or subsequent to acquisition), including acquisition expenses and budgeted capital improvement costs (regardless of the level of debt used to finance the investment), and (ii) 2.0% of the amount paid or allocated to fund the acquisition, development, construction or improvement of the property (whether at or subsequent to acquisition), including acquisition expenses and budgeted capital improvement costs, less any debt used to finance the investment.

The Advisory Agreement defers the Company’s obligation to pay asset management fees, without interest, accruing from February 1, 2013 through July 31, 2013. The Company will only be obligated to pay the Advisor such deferred amounts if and to the extent that the Company’s funds from operations, as such term is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and interpreted by the Company, as adjusted for the effects of straight-line rents and acquisition costs and expenses (“AFFO”) for the immediately preceding month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for record dates of such prior month (an “AFFO Surplus”). The amount of any AFFO Surplus in a given month shall be applied first to pay to the Advisor asset management fees currently due with respect to such month (including any that would otherwise have been deferred for that month in accordance with the Advisory Agreement) and then to pay asset management fees previously deferred by the Advisor in accordance with the Advisory Agreement that remain unpaid. The Company had accrued and deferred payment of $1.5 million of asset management fees for February 2013 through July 2013 under the Advisory Agreement, as the Company believed the payment of this amount to the Advisor was probable at the time it was recorded. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company reversed, as an increase to other income, the liabilities due to affiliates related to the $1.5 million of asset management fees for the period from February 2013 through July 2013 as the Company believes that the payment of this amount to the Advisor is remote.

In addition, the Advisory Agreement defers without interest under certain circumstances, the Company’s obligation to pay asset management fees accruing from August 1, 2013. Specifically, the Advisory Agreement defers the Company’s obligation to pay an asset management fee for any month in which the Company’s modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) for such month, as such term is defined in the practice guideline issued by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) in November 2010 and interpreted by the Company, excluding asset management fees, does not exceed the amount of distributions declared by the Company for record dates of that month. The Company remains obligated to pay the Advisor an asset management fee in any month in which the Company’s MFFO, excluding asset management fees, for such month exceeds the amount of distributions declared for the record dates of that month (such excess amount, an “MFFO Surplus”); however, any amount of such asset management fee in excess of the MFFO Surplus is also deferred under the Advisory Agreement. If the MFFO Surplus for any month exceeds the amount of the asset management fee payable for such month, any remaining MFFO Surplus will not be applied to pay asset management fee amounts previously deferred by the Advisor in accordance with the Advisory Agreement. The Company had accrued and deferred payment of $3.3 million of asset management fees for August 2013 through December 2014 under the Advisory Agreement, as the Company believed the payment of this amount to the Advisor was probable at the time it was recorded. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company reversed, as an increase to other income, the liabilities due to affiliates related to the $3.3 million of asset management fees for the period from August 2013 through December 2014 as the Company believes that the payment of this amount to the Advisor is remote.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred $2.1 million of asset management fees. However, the Company only recorded $0.7 million pursuant to the limitations in the Advisory Agreement as noted above. The Company deferred but did not accrue the remaining $1.4 million of these asset management fees as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred $2.2 million of asset management fees. However, the Company only recorded $0.3 million pursuant to the limitations in the Advisory Agreement as noted above. The Company deferred but did not accrue the remaining $1.9 million of these asset management fees as it is uncertain whether any of this amount will be paid in the future.

However, notwithstanding any of the foregoing, any and all deferred asset management fees shall be immediately due and payable at such time as the Company’s stockholders have received, together as a collective group, aggregate distributions (including distributions that may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes) sufficient to provide (i) a return of their net invested capital, or the amount calculated by multiplying the total number of shares purchased by stockholders by the issue price, reduced by any amounts to repurchase shares pursuant to the Company’s share redemption plan, and (ii) an 8.0% per year cumulative, non-compounded return on such net invested capital (the “Stockholders’ 8% Return”). The Stockholders’ 8% Return is not based on the return provided to any individual stockholder. Accordingly, it is not necessary for each of the Company’s stockholders to have received any minimum return in order for the Advisor to receive deferred asset management fees.

Property Management Agreements

The Company, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (each, a “Property Owner”), has entered into property management agreements with LPI (each, a “Property Management Agreement”), pursuant to which LPI provides, among other services, general property management services, including bookkeeping and accounting services, construction management services and budgeting and business plans for the Company’s properties as follows:

Property Name	Effective Date	Management Fee Percentage
Watertower Apartments	04/07/2015	2.75%
Crystal Park at Waterford	04/14/2015	3.00%
The Residence at Waterstone	04/28/2015	3.00%
Lofts at the Highlands	05/05/2015	3.00%
Legacy at Martin’s Point	05/12/2015	3.00%
Poplar Creek	05/14/2015	3.00%
Wesley Village	05/19/2015	3.00%
Legacy Grand at Concord	05/21/2015	3.00%
Millennium Apartment Homes (1)	05/27/2015	3.00%
Legacy Crescent Park (1)	05/29/2015	3.00%
Legacy at Valley Ranch	06/09/2015	3.00%

____________________

⁽¹⁾ Under the Property Management Agreement, the Property Owner will pay LPI the Management Fee Percentage in an amount equal to the greater of (a) 3% of the Gross Monthly Collections (as defined in the Property Management Agreement) or (b) $4,000 per month.

Under the Property Management Agreements, each Property Owner pays LPI: (i) a monthly fee based on a percentage (as described in the table above, the “Management Fee Percentage”) of the Gross Monthly Collections (as defined in each Property Management Agreement), (ii) a construction supervision fee equal to a percentage of construction costs to the extent overseen by LPI and as further detailed in each Property Management Agreement, (iii) a leasing commission at a rate to be agreed upon between the Property Owner and LPI for retail leases executed that were procured or obtained by LPI, (iv) certain reimbursements if included in an approved capital budget and (v) certain reimbursements if included in the approved operating budget, including the reimbursement of the salaries and benefits for on-site personnel. Unless otherwise provided for in an approved operating budget, LPI is responsible for all expenses that it incurs in rendering services pursuant to each Property Management Agreement. Each Property Management Agreement has an initial term of one year and will continue thereafter on a month-to-month basis unless either party gives 30 days’ prior written notice of its desire to terminate the Property Management Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Property Owner may terminate each Property Management Agreement at any time without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice to LPI. The Property Owner may also terminate the Property Management Agreement with cause immediately upon notice to LPI and the expiration of any applicable cure period. LPI may terminate each Property Management Agreement at any time without cause upon prior written notice to the Property Owner which, depending upon the terms of the particular Property Management Agreement, requires either 30, 60 or 90 days prior written notice. LPI may terminate the Property Management Agreement for cause if a Property Owner commits any material default under the Property Management Agreement and the default continues for a period of 30 days after notice from LPI to a Property Owner for a default or, in the case of Watertower Apartments, Lofts at the Highlands, Wesley Village, Legacy Grand at Concord, Millennium Apartment Homes and Legacy Crescent Park, if a monetary default continues for a period of 10 days after notice of such monetary default.

The Management Fee Percentage and any other fees and reimbursements payable to LPI by the Property Owner under each Property Management Agreement are approximately equal to the applicable percentage and other fees and reimbursements payable to LPR by the Property Owner under the now-terminated account services agreements and to the prior third party management companies by the Property Owner under the now-terminated prior property management agreements.

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Economic Dependency

The Company is dependent on the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the management of the daily operations of the Company’s investment portfolio; the disposition of investments; and other general and administrative responsibilities. The Company is also dependent on LPI to provide the property management services under the Property Management Agreements. In the event that these companies are unable to provide any of the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Environmental

As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Although there can be no assurance, the Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s property, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the property could result in future environmental liabilities.

Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company may become party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is probable or reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, which would require accrual or disclosure of the contingency and possible range of loss. Additionally, the Company has not recorded any loss contingencies related to legal proceedings in which the potential loss is deemed to be remote.

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.

Distributions Paid

On October 3, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $1.1 million, which related to distributions declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from September 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. On November 1, 2016, the Company paid distributions of $1.1 million, which related to distributions declared for daily record dates for each day in the period from October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016.

Distributions Declared

On October 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016, which the Company expects to pay in December 2016. On November 10, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, which the Company expects to pay in January 2017, and distributions based on daily record dates for the period from January 1, 2017 through January 31, 2017, which the Company expects to pay in February 2017. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day and equal a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.32% annualized rate based on the Company’s December 8, 2015 estimated value per share of $10.29.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings, the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes thereto in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and condensed notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the Company’s prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.  These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations of prior periods.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company entered into various Property Management Agreements (defined below) with Legacy Partners, Inc., formerly known as Legacy Partners Residential, Inc. (“LPI”), an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor.  See Note 6, “Related Party Transactions — Property Management Agreements.”  As a result, management fees to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the Company’s real estate properties, have been reclassified from operating, maintenance and management costs to property management fees and expenses to affiliate on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Segments

The Company had invested in 11 apartment complexes as of September 30, 2016. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue and net income is from real estate, and therefore, the Company currently operates in one reportable segment.

Square Footage, Occupancy and Other Measures

Any references to square footage or occupancy are unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s review of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Per Share Data

Basic net income per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income per share of common stock equals basic net income per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Distributions declared per common share were $0.164 and $0.486 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.164 and $0.486 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Distributions declared per common share assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, distributions were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day. Each day during the period from January 1, 2016 through February 28, 2016 and March 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 was a record date for distributions. Each day during the period from January 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015 was a record date for distributions.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU No. 2014-09”).  ASU No. 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.  ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  ASU No. 2014-09 does not apply to lease contracts within the scope of Leases (Topic 840). ASU No. 2014-09 was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU No. 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 on its financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU No. 2014-15”). The amendments in ASU No. 2014-15 require management to evaluate, for each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or are available to be issued when applicable) and, if so, provide related disclosures. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU No. 2016-01”).  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.  ASU No. 2016-01 primarily affects accounting for equity investments and financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected.  ASU No. 2016-01 also requires entities to present financial assets and financial liabilities separately, grouped by measurement category and form of financial asset in the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.  ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”). The amendments in ASU No. 2016-02 change the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 as of its issuance is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new leases standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU No. 2016-15”).  ASU No. 2016-15 is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows.  The amendments in ASU No. 2016-15 provide guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including the following that are or may be relevant to the Company: (a) Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities; (b) Cash payments relating to contingent consideration made soon after an acquisition’s consummation date (i.e., approximately three months or less) should be classified as cash outflows for investing activities. Payments made thereafter should be classified as cash outflows for financing activities up to the amount of the original contingent consideration liability. Payments made in excess of the amount of the original contingent consideration liability should be classified as cash outflows for operating activities; (c) Cash payments received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the nature of the loss (or each component loss, if an entity receives a lump-sum settlement); (d) In the absence of specific guidance, an entity should classify each separately identifiable cash source and use on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. For cash flows with aspects of more than one class that cannot be separated, the classification should be based on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flow.  ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-15 on its financial statements

XML

REAL ESTATE (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Real Estate [Abstract]

Schedule of Real Estate Investments

The following table provides summary information regarding the properties owned by the Company as of September 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Property Name	Date Acquired	Location	Total Real Estate, Cost		Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization			Total Real Estate, Net
Legacy at Valley Ranch	10/26/2010	Irving, TX	$	36,485	$	(4,995	)	$	31,490
Poplar Creek	02/09/2012	Schaumburg, IL	27,200		(2,820		)	24,380
The Residence at Waterstone	04/06/2012	Pikesville, MD	65,270		(7,376		)	57,894
Legacy Crescent Park	05/03/2012	Greer, SC	20,714		(2,763		)	17,951
Legacy at Martin’s Point	05/31/2012	Lombard, IL	37,487		(5,198		)	32,289
Wesley Village	11/06/2012	Charlotte, NC	44,433		(4,659		)	39,774
Watertower Apartments	01/15/2013	Eden Prairie, MN	38,722		(4,020		)	34,702
Crystal Park at Waterford	05/08/2013	Frederick, MD	46,050		(4,758		)	41,292
Millennium Apartment Homes	06/07/2013	Greenville, SC	33,276		(3,376		)	29,900
Legacy Grand at Concord	02/18/2014	Concord, NC	27,855		(2,143		)	25,712
Lofts at the Highlands	02/25/2014	St. Louis, MO	35,826		(2,484		)	33,342
			$	413,318	$	(44,592	)	$	368,726

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes Payable [Abstract]

Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s notes payable consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Book Value as of September 30, 2016			Book Value as of December 31, 2015			Contractual Interest Rate as of September 30, 2016	Payment Type	Maturity Date
Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan	$	31,111		$	31,554		3.9%	Principal & Interest	04/01/2019
Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan	19,509			19,785			4.0%	Principal & Interest	03/01/2019
The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan	45,883			46,550			3.8%	Principal & Interest	05/01/2019
Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan	13,636			13,858			3.5%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2019
Legacy at Martin’s Point Mortgage Loan	21,984			22,330			3.3%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2019
Wesley Village Mortgage Loan	27,041			27,566			2.6%	Principal & Interest	12/01/2017
Watertower Mortgage Loan	24,091			24,525			2.5%	Principal & Interest	02/10/2018
Crystal Park Mortgage Loan	27,190			27,709			2.5%	Principal & Interest	06/01/2018
Millennium Mortgage Loan	20,317			20,689			2.7%	Principal & Interest	07/01/2018
Legacy Grand at Concord Mortgage Loan	22,468			22,693			4.1%	Principal & Interest	12/01/2050
Lofts at the Highlands Mortgage Loan	30,864			31,190			3.4%	Principal & Interest	08/01/2052
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$	284,094		$	288,449
Discount on note payable, net	(2,666		)	(2,731		)
Deferred financing costs, net	(919		)	(1,230		)
Total notes payable, net	$	280,509		$	284,488

Schedule of Maturities of Long-term Debt

The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for the Company’s notes payable outstanding as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016	$	1,488
2017	32,196
2018	72,958
2019	126,682
2020	852
Thereafter	49,918
	$	284,094

XML

FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of Face Value, Carrying Amounts and Fair Value

The following were the face value, carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s notes payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Face Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable	$	284,094	$	280,509	$	290,036	$	288,449	$	284,488	$	284,160

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Schedule of Related Party Costs

Pursuant to the terms of these agreements and the property management agreements discussed below, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and any related amounts payable as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

	Incurred								Payable as of
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
Expensed
Asset management fees (1)	$	104	$	144	$	343	$	687	$	49	$	4,752
Reimbursable operating expenses (2)	68		58		184		264		12		25
Property management fees and expenses (3)	1,506		1,368		4,359		2,136		218		117
	$	1,678	$	1,570	$	4,886	$	3,087	$	279	$	4,894

____________________

⁽¹⁾ See “Advisory Agreement – Asset Management Fee” below.

⁽²⁾ Reimbursable operating expenses primarily consist of marketing research costs and property site visit expenses incurred by the Sub-Advisor and internal audit personnel costs, accounting software and cybersecurity related expenses incurred by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. Beginning July 1, 2010, the Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These amounts totaled $48,000 and $44,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $123,000 and $92,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and were the only type of employee costs reimbursed under the Advisory Agreement through September 30, 2016. The Company does not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which the Advisor earns acquisition or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers. In addition to the amounts above, the Company reimburses the Advisor and Sub-Advisor for certain of the Company’s direct property operating costs incurred from third parties that were initially paid by the Advisor and Sub-Advisor on behalf of the Company.

⁽³⁾ Property management fees and expenses consist of property management fees paid to LPI, as well as reimbursable on-site personnel salary and related benefits expenses at the properties and through March 31, 2015, fees for account maintenance and bookkeeping services paid to Legacy Partners Residential, L.P., an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor (“LPR”), under the now-terminated account services agreements. See “— Property Management Agreements.”

Schedule of Property Management Agreements

The Company, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (each, a “Property Owner”), has entered into property management agreements with LPI (each, a “Property Management Agreement”), pursuant to which LPI provides, among other services, general property management services, including bookkeeping and accounting services, construction management services and budgeting and business plans for the Company’s properties as follows:

Property Name	Effective Date	Management Fee Percentage
Watertower Apartments	04/07/2015	2.75%
Crystal Park at Waterford	04/14/2015	3.00%
The Residence at Waterstone	04/28/2015	3.00%
Lofts at the Highlands	05/05/2015	3.00%
Legacy at Martin’s Point	05/12/2015	3.00%
Poplar Creek	05/14/2015	3.00%
Wesley Village	05/19/2015	3.00%
Legacy Grand at Concord	05/21/2015	3.00%
Millennium Apartment Homes (1)	05/27/2015	3.00%
Legacy Crescent Park (1)	05/29/2015	3.00%
Legacy at Valley Ranch	06/09/2015	3.00%

____________________

⁽¹⁾ Under the Property Management Agreement, the Property Owner will pay LPI the Management Fee Percentage in an amount equal to the greater of (a) 3% of the Gross Monthly Collections (as defined in the Property Management Agreement) or (b) $4,000 per month.

XML

ORGANIZATION (Details)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	36 Months Ended	43 Months Ended	79 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) property shares	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($) shares	Mar. 12, 2013 USD ($) shares	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) property shares	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) property shares	May 31, 2012 USD ($)	Aug. 19, 2009 shares	Aug. 07, 2009 $ / shares shares
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Partnership interest in Operating Partnership	0.10%
Partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and is its sole limited partner	99.90%
Common stock, shares issued	20,751,787	20,508,397		20,751,787	20,751,787
Issuance of common stock, value | $	$ 4,324,000	$ 5,736,000	$ 179,200,000	$ 15,900,000	$ 214,500,000
Shares of common stock sold under dividend reinvestment plan, value | $			$ 3,500,000		23,000,000
Redemptions of common stock, value | $	$ 2,019,000	$ 1,697,000			$ 7,900,000
Apartment Complex [Member]
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Number of real estate properties | property	11			11	11
Common Stock [Member]
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Shares of common stock authorized under dividend reinvestment plan, shares							80,000,000
Issuance of common stock, shares	442,104	595,095	18,088,084	1,496,198	21,539,479
Issuance of common stock, value | $	$ 4,000	$ 6,000
Shares of common stock sold under dividend reinvestment plan, shares			368,872		2,324,069
Redemptions of common stock, shares	198,714	171,528			807,692
Redemptions of common stock, value | $	$ 2,000	$ 2,000
Common Stock [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Number of shares authorized to be repurchased							250,000
Common Stock [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Number of shares authorized to be repurchased							280,000,000
Stock offering, shares authorized for issuance, value | $						$ 2,000,000,000
Stock offering, shares authorized for dividend reinvestment plan, value | $						$ 760,000,000
KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC [Member]
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Common stock, shares issued								20,000
Common stock, purchase price per share | $ / shares								$ 10
KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC [Member] | Common Stock [Member]
Organizational Structure [Line Items]
Shares held by affiliate	20,000			20,000	20,000

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 property $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2016 segment property $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 $ / shares
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Number of reportable segments | segment			1
Distributions declared per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.164	$ 0.164	$ 0.486	$ 0.486
Distribution rate per share per day on annual basis, declared (in dollars per share)	$ 0.00178082	$ 0.00178082	$ 0.00178082	$ 0.00178082
Apartment Complex [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Number of real estate properties | property	11		11

XML

REAL ESTATE (Narrative) (Details) $ in Thousands, ft² in Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) ft² property unit	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) ft² property unit	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Number of real estate units | unit	3,039		3,039
Rentable square feet | ft²	3.1		3.1
Percentage of portfolio occupied	94.00%		94.00%
Tax abatement asset	$ 3,000		$ 3,000		$ 3,200
Property Tax Abatement Intangible Asset [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Amortization of intangible assets	$ 65	$ 65	$ 200	$ 200
Apartment Complex [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Number of real estate properties | property	11		11

XML

REAL ESTATE (Schedule of Real Estate Investments) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 413,318	$ 412,047
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(44,592)	(35,713)
Total real estate, net	$ 368,726	$ 376,334
Legacy at Valley Ranch [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Oct. 26, 2010
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 36,485
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(4,995)
Total real estate, net	$ 31,490
Poplar Creek [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Feb. 09, 2012
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 27,200
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(2,820)
Total real estate, net	$ 24,380
The Residence at Waterstone [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Apr. 06, 2012
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 65,270
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(7,376)
Total real estate, net	$ 57,894
Legacy Crescent Park [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	May 03, 2012
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 20,714
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(2,763)
Total real estate, net	$ 17,951
Legacy at Martin’s Point [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	May 31, 2012
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 37,487
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(5,198)
Total real estate, net	$ 32,289
Wesley Village [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Nov. 06, 2012
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 44,433
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(4,659)
Total real estate, net	$ 39,774
Watertower Apartments [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Jan. 15, 2013
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 38,722
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(4,020)
Total real estate, net	$ 34,702
Crystal Park at Waterford [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	May 08, 2013
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 46,050
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(4,758)
Total real estate, net	$ 41,292
Millennium Apartment Homes [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Jun. 07, 2013
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 33,276
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(3,376)
Total real estate, net	$ 29,900
Legacy Grand at Concord [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Feb. 18, 2014
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 27,855
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(2,143)
Total real estate, net	$ 25,712
Lofts of the Highlands [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Date Acquired	Feb. 25, 2014
Total Real Estate at Cost	$ 35,826
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization	(2,484)
Total real estate, net	$ 33,342

XML

REAL ESTATE (Property Damages) (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) property	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Number of real estate properties suffered from physical damage | property			1
Maximum deductible per incident			$ 12,500
Loss due to property damages			145,000	$ 78,000
Insurance recoveries			132,500
Operating, maintenance, and management	$ 1,671,000	$ 1,915,000	4,854,000	$ 6,914,000
Damaged Properties [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Operating, maintenance, and management			$ 12,500

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest expense	$ 2,588	$ 2,636	$ 7,758	$ 7,879
Amortization of deferred financing costs	100	100	300	300
Amortization of discount on notes payable			65	65
Interest payable, current	800		800		$ 800
Notes Payable [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Amortization of discount on notes payable	$ 22	$ 22	$ 65	$ 65

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 284,094	$ 288,449
Discount on note payable, net	(2,666)	(2,731)
Deferred financing costs, net	(919)	(1,230)
Total notes payable, net	280,509	284,488
Mortgages [Member] | Legacy at Valley Ranch [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 31,111	31,554
Contractual Interest Rate	3.90%
Maturity Date	Apr. 01, 2019
Mortgages [Member] | Poplar Creek [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 19,509	19,785
Contractual Interest Rate	4.00%
Maturity Date	Mar. 01, 2019
Mortgages [Member] | The Residence at Waterstone [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 45,883	46,550
Contractual Interest Rate	3.80%
Maturity Date	May 01, 2019
Mortgages [Member] | Legacy Crescent Park [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 13,636	13,858
Contractual Interest Rate	3.50%
Maturity Date	Jun. 01, 2019
Mortgages [Member] | Legacy at Martin’s Point [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 21,984	22,330
Contractual Interest Rate	3.30%
Maturity Date	Jun. 01, 2019
Mortgages [Member] | Wesley Village [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 27,041	27,566
Contractual Interest Rate	2.60%
Maturity Date	Dec. 01, 2017
Mortgages [Member] | Watertower Apartments [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 24,091	24,525
Contractual Interest Rate	2.50%
Maturity Date	Feb. 10, 2018
Mortgages [Member] | Crystal Park Mortgage Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 27,190	27,709
Contractual Interest Rate	2.50%
Maturity Date	Jun. 01, 2018
Mortgages [Member] | Millennium Mortgage Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 20,317	20,689
Contractual Interest Rate	2.70%
Maturity Date	Jul. 01, 2018
Mortgages [Member] | Legacy Grand at Concord Mortgage Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 22,468	22,693
Contractual Interest Rate	4.10%
Maturity Date	Dec. 01, 2050
Mortgages [Member] | Lofts at the Highlands Mortgage Loan [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total notes payable principal outstanding	$ 30,864	$ 31,190
Contractual Interest Rate	3.40%
Maturity Date	Aug. 01, 2052

XML

NOTES PAYABLE (Schedule of Maturities of Long-Term Debt) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Notes Payable [Abstract]
October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016	$ 1,488
2017	32,196
2018	72,958
2019	126,682
2020	852
Thereafter	49,918
Notes payable	$ 284,094	$ 288,449

XML

FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES (Details) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Notes payable, Face Value	$ 284,094,000	$ 288,449,000
Carrying Amount [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Notes payable, Value	280,509,000	284,488,000
Fair Value [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Notes payable, Value	$ 290,036,000	$ 284,160,000

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Mar. 05, 2014	Aug. 14, 2013
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due to affiliates	$ 279	$ 279		$ 4,894
Non‑compounded return on net invested capital						8.00%
LPR Inc. [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Initial term of management agreements	1 year
Period of termination notice	30 days
Period of termination notice 2	60 days
Period of termination notice 3	90 days
Period of monetary default	30 days
LPR Inc. [Member] | Watertower Apartments and Lofts at the Highlands [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Period of monetary default	10 days
Option One [Member] | KBS Capital Advisors LLC [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Acquisition advisory fee, percent	1.00%	1.00%
Monthly asset management fee, percent of acquisition expense							0.083%
Option Two [Member] | KBS Capital Advisors LLC [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Acquisition advisory fee, percent	2.00%	2.00%
Monthly asset management fee, percent of acquisition expense							0.166%
Asset Management Fees [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due to affiliates	$ 300	$ 300	$ 700
Incurred expenses		2,200	2,100
Deferred fees		1,900	$ 1,400
Asset Management Fees [Member] | February through July 2013 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due to affiliates	1,500	1,500
Asset Management Fees [Member] | August 2013 through December 2014 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due to affiliates					$ 3,300
KBS Capital Advisors LLC [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Incurred expenses		61
KBS Capital Advisors LLC [Member] | Legal and Professional Fees Reimbursement [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from related parties	100	100
KBS Capital Advisors LLC [Member] | Property Insurance Rebate [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from related parties	$ 28	$ 28

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Schedule of Related Party Costs) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Payable as of	$ 279		$ 279		$ 4,894
Administrative fees	48	$ 44	123	$ 92
Asset Management Fees [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Expenses			2,200	2,100
Payable as of	300	700	300	700
Advisor and Dealer Manager [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Expenses	1,678	1,570	4,886	3,087
Payable as of	279		279		4,894
Advisor and Dealer Manager [Member] | Asset Management Fees [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Expenses	104	144	343	687
Payable as of	49		49		4,752
Advisor and Dealer Manager [Member] | Reimbursement of Operating Expenses [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Expenses	68	58	184	264
Payable as of	12		12		25
Advisor and Dealer Manager [Member] | Property Management Fees and Expenses [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Expenses	1,506	$ 1,368	4,359	$ 2,136
Payable as of	$ 218		$ 218		$ 117

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Property Management Agreements) (Details) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Watertower Apartments [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	2.75%
Crystal Park at Waterford [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
The Residence at Waterstone [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Lofts of the Highlands [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Legacy at Martin’s Point [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Poplar Creek [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Wesley Village [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Legacy Grand at Concord [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Millennium Apartment Homes [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Property management fee, amount	$ 4
Millennium Apartment Homes [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Legacy Crescent Park [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Property management fee, amount	$ 4
Legacy Crescent Park [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%
Legacy at Valley Ranch [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management Fee Percentage	3.00%

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Distributions) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands					3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Nov. 10, 2016	Nov. 01, 2016	Oct. 11, 2016	Oct. 03, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Paid distributions							$ 10,015		$ 13,176
Distribution rate per share per day on annual basis, declared (in dollars per share)					$ 0.00178082	$ 0.00178082	$ 0.00178082	$ 0.00178082
Subsequent Event [Member] | Dividend Paid [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Paid distributions		$ 1,100		$ 1,100
Subsequent Event [Member] | Dividend Declared [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Distribution rate per share per day on annual basis, declared (in dollars per share)	$ 0.00178082		$ 0.00178082
Distribution rate per share annualized, declared, based on offering price	6.32%		6.32%
Offering price per share	$ 10.29		$ 10.29