|
|
|
||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
(Commission File Number)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
|
|
||
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|
|
|
||
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d -2(b))
|
|
|
||
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e -4(c))
|
Title of each class
|
Trading
Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.07
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
1. |
Proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 1, 2022 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among The Toronto-Dominion Bank, a Canadian chartered bank (“Parent”),
Crimson Holdings Acquisition Co., a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), and the Company (the “Merger Proposal”) as described in the Proxy Statement.
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
21,091,669
|
20,335
|
88,126
|
–
|
2. |
Proposal to approve, by advisory (non-binding) vote, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company’s named executive officers in connection with
the consummation of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Advisory Compensation Proposal”) as described in the Proxy Statement.
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
7,105,623
|
12,836,679
|
1,257,828
|
–
|
3. |
In connection with the Special Meeting, the Company also solicited proxies with respect to the adjournment of the Special Meeting for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal (the “Adjournment Proposal”) as described in the Proxy
Statement. As there were sufficient votes at the time of the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal, the Adjournment Proposal was unnecessary and such proposal was not submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval at the
Special Meeting.
|
Item 8.01.
|
Other Events.
|
● |
the parties’ ability to consummate the proposed transaction in within the expected time-frame or at all;
|
● |
the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the completion of the proposed transaction, including the receipt of regulatory clearances required to consummate the proposed
transaction, in each case, on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule;
|
● |
the risk that the parties may be unable to achieve the anticipated benefits of the proposed transaction within the expected time-frames or at all;
|
● |
the occurrence of any event that could give rise to the termination of the proposed transaction, including in circumstances which would require the Company to pay a termination fee;
|
● |
the effect of the announcement or pendency of the proposed transaction on the Company’s ability to retain and hire key personnel and its ability to maintain relationships with its
customers, clients, vendors and others with whom it does business;
|
● |
risks related to diverting management’s attention from the Company’s ongoing business operations; and
|
● |
the risk that stockholder litigation in connection with the proposed transaction may result in significant costs of defense, indemnification and liability and may delay the proposed
transaction.
|
Item 9.01.
|
Financial Statements and Exhibits.
|
99.1 |
COWEN INC.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 15, 2022
|
By:
|
/s/ Owen S. Littman |
|
|
|
Name:
|
Owen S. Littman
|
||
|
Title:
|
General Counsel
|
|