XML 127 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]
In accordance with the new requirements prescribed in Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (“CAP”) and our financial performance for the prior three fiscal years.
For this purpose, CAP is determined in accordance with SEC rules by adjusting the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table by (a) subtracting the change in pension value, if any, for the year; (b) adding the pension service cost for the year; (c) subtracting the grant date fair value of equity awards granted during the year; (d) adding the year-end fair value of unvested equity awards granted during the year; (e) for awards granted in prior years that vested during the year, adding the difference between the vesting date fair value and the fair value at the immediately preceding year-end; and (f) for awards granted in prior years that remain outstanding or unvested at the end of the year, adding the difference between the year-end fair value and the fair value at the immediately preceding year-end. These adjustments are shown below. The table below provides CAP for our principal executive officer (“PEO”) (our CEO) and an average CAP for our non-PEO named executive officers (“NEOs”), as well as other financial information as required. Please see the Compensation Discussion & Analysis above for information regarding the decisions made by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation paid to our CEO and NEOs.
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for First PEO
($)(a)
Compensation Actually Paid to First PEO
($)(b)
Summary Compensation Table Total for Second PEO
($)(a)
Compensation Actually Paid to Second PEO
($)(b)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs
($)(a)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs
($)(a)(b)
Total Shareholder Return
($)(c)
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return
($)(c)
Net Income ($M) (d)
Revenue
($M) (e)
2022N/AN/A12,770,195 9,019,182 3,164,279 1,947,464 171 127 1,756.5 15,991.7 
202118,253,260 46,032,830 12,888,518 20,449,001 3,813,093 8,590,730 202 134 1,423.4 14,136.4 
202028,107,486 55,194,418 N/AN/A4,854,212 9,065,250 144 111 854.9 12,454.7 
(a)The First PEO represents our former CEO Mr. Lamach who became Executive Chair effective July 1, 2021 and retired December 31, 2021; the Second PEO represents Mr. Regnery who became CEO effective July 1, 2021. The non-PEO NEOs represent the following individuals: 2020: Mr. Kuehn, Ms. Carter, Mr. Regnery, Ms. Avedon, and Mr. Camuti; 2021: Mr. Kuehn, Ms. Avedon, Mr. Camuti and Mr. Turtz; 2022: Mr. Kuehn, Mr. Camuti, Mr. Turtz and Mr. Pittard. The amounts shown for each PEO are the amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. The amounts shown for the non-PEO NEOs are the average of amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for NEOs other than the PEO.
(b)The following table provides the calculation required to determine CAP in accordance with SEC rules. The CAP amounts reflected do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs. The fair values reflected in the Equity Compensation section are calculated in a manner consistent with the methodology used to account for share-based payments in our financial statements, as described in Note 14 to the 2022 10-K. To determine equity award fair values for purposes of calculating CAP in accordance with SEC rules, adjustments were made based on the stock price, updated Black-Scholes stock option assumptions, and estimated Performance Share Unit payouts as of the year-end and vesting measurement dates.
Pension CompensationEquity Compensation
Fiscal Year (FY)Summary Compensation Table (SCT) Total
($)
LESS SCT Aggregate Change in the Actuarial Present Value of All Defined Benefit and Actuarial Pension Plans
($)(1)
PLUS Service Cost and Prior Service Cost
($)
LESS SCT Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in FY ($)(2)
PLUS Fair Value of Outstanding Equity Awards Granted in FY
($)
PLUS Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards from Prior Years That Vested in FY
($)
PLUS Change in Fair Value of Outstanding Equity Awards from Prior Years
($)
Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) Total
($)
First PEO
M. W. Lamach
2021 18,253,260 920,815 2,165,012 11,417,703 12,915,519 1,898,863 23,138,694 46,032,830 
2020 28,107,486 11,591,666 1,584,239 11,762,881 19,402,771 4,924,066 24,530,403 55,194,418 
Second PEO
D. S. Regnery
2022 12,770,195 — 479 8,082,094 8,790,912 (3,480,220)(980,090)9,019,182 
2021 12,888,518 2,695,010 3,454 6,673,971 9,239,470 634,638 7,051,902 20,449,001 
Average non-PEO NEOs2022 3,164,279 — 287,386 1,558,144 1,695,006 (1,305,293)(335,770)1,947,464 
2021 3,813,093 309,031 457,055 1,822,743 3,002,913 181,250 3,268,193 8,590,730 
2020 4,854,212 1,634,400 248,316 1,783,574 2,941,593 711,361 3,727,742 9,065,250 
(1) As reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” of the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year.
(2) As reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year.
(c)Reflects the cumulative Total Shareholder Return for Trane Technologies and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Industrials Index, which is the peer group used in the Performance Graph required under Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K shown in Item 5 of our 2022 Form 10-K. Assumes an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2019 (adjusted for our Reverse Morris Trust transaction that closed on February 29, 2020) and reinvestment of dividends.
(d)As reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings included in the Form 10-K for each fiscal year.
(e)The Company Selected Measure (“CSM”) is Net Revenues for Products and Services (“Revenue”) as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Earnings included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for each fiscal year. The revenue performance targets and results related to executive compensation within our AIM program are not the same as the Revenue listed for the CSM. Revenue results related to AIM are further adjusted for the impact of acquisitions and/or divestitures, foreign exchange, changes in accounting principles, extraordinary items, and unusual or non-recurring gains or losses, including significant differences from the assumptions contained in the financial plan upon which the incentive targets were established. All adjustments are reviewed and approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
Relationships between Pay and Various Metrics
In accordance with regulatory requirements, the graphs below reflect the relationships of PEO and Average Non-PEO CAP over the prior three fiscal years to (i) Company TSR and Peer Group TSR, (ii) Net Income, and (iii) Revenue, our Company Selected Measure.
CAP VS TT AND PEER GROUP TSR
pg75-bar_peergroup.jpg


CAP VS NET INCOME
bar_netincome-01.jpg
CAP VS REVENUE
bar_revenue.jpg
Performance Measures
We used the following unranked performance measures to link executive compensation actually paid to Company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year.
Financial Measures
Revenue
Adjusted EBITDA
Free Cash Flow
Relative 3-Year Total Shareholder Return Percentile Ranking
Relative Cash Flow Return on Invested Capital Percentile Ranking
Additional information about the performance measures used to calculate PEO and NEO compensation can be found in the discussions of our short-term and long-term incentive programs in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” under the headings “Annual Incentive Matrix (‘AIM’) Program” and “Long-Term Incentive Program (‘LTI’)”. We believe the Company’s executive compensation program appropriately rewards our PEO and the Other NEOs for Company and individual performance, assists the Company in retaining our senior leadership team and supports long-term value creation for our shareholders. These values demonstrate alignment of interests of our PEO and the Other NEOs and our stockholders.
   
Company Selected Measure Name Revenue($M) (e)    
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block] The First PEO represents our former CEO Mr. Lamach who became Executive Chair effective July 1, 2021 and retired December 31, 2021; the Second PEO represents Mr. Regnery who became CEO effective July 1, 2021. The non-PEO NEOs represent the following individuals: 2020: Mr. Kuehn, Ms. Carter, Mr. Regnery, Ms. Avedon, and Mr. Camuti; 2021: Mr. Kuehn, Ms. Avedon, Mr. Camuti and Mr. Turtz; 2022: Mr. Kuehn, Mr. Camuti, Mr. Turtz and Mr. Pittard. The amounts shown for each PEO are the amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. The amounts shown for the non-PEO NEOs are the average of amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for NEOs other than the PEO.    
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block] Reflects the cumulative Total Shareholder Return for Trane Technologies and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Industrials Index, which is the peer group used in the Performance Graph required under Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K shown in Item 5 of our 2022 Form 10-K. Assumes an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2019 (adjusted for our Reverse Morris Trust transaction that closed on February 29, 2020) and reinvestment of dividends.    
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 3,164,279 $ 3,813,093 $ 4,854,212
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 1,947,464 8,590,730 9,065,250
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]
CAP VS TT AND PEER GROUP TSR
pg75-bar_peergroup.jpg
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]
CAP VS NET INCOME
bar_netincome-01.jpg
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]
CAP VS REVENUE
bar_revenue.jpg
   
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block]
CAP VS TT AND PEER GROUP TSR
pg75-bar_peergroup.jpg
   
Tabular List [Table Text Block]
We used the following unranked performance measures to link executive compensation actually paid to Company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year.
Financial Measures
Revenue
Adjusted EBITDA
Free Cash Flow
Relative 3-Year Total Shareholder Return Percentile Ranking
Relative Cash Flow Return on Invested Capital Percentile Ranking
   
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 171 202 144
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 127 134 111
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,756,500,000 $ 1,423,400,000 $ 854,900,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 15,991,700,000 14,136,400,000 12,454,700,000
PEO Name Mr. Regnery   CEO Mr. Lamach
Measure [Axis]: 1      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Revenue    
Measure [Axis]: 2      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA    
Measure [Axis]: 3      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Free Cash Flow    
Measure [Axis]: 4      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Relative 3-Year Total Shareholder Return Percentile Ranking    
Measure [Axis]: 5      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Relative Cash Flow Return on Invested Capital Percentile Ranking    
Second PEO [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 12,770,195 $ 12,888,518  
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount 9,019,182 20,449,001  
First PEO [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
PEO Total Compensation Amount   18,253,260 $ 28,107,486
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount   46,032,830 55,194,418
PEO [Member] | Second PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 1 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 0 2,695,010  
PEO [Member] | Second PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 2 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 479 3,454  
PEO [Member] | Second PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 3 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 8,082,094 6,673,971  
PEO [Member] | Second PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 4 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 8,790,912 9,239,470  
PEO [Member] | Second PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 5 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (3,480,220) 634,638  
PEO [Member] | Second PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 6 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (980,090) 7,051,902  
PEO [Member] | First PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 1 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   920,815 11,591,666
PEO [Member] | First PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 2 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   2,165,012 1,584,239
PEO [Member] | First PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 3 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   11,417,703 11,762,881
PEO [Member] | First PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 4 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   12,915,519 19,402,771
PEO [Member] | First PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 5 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   1,898,863 4,924,066
PEO [Member] | First PEO [Member] | Adjustment type 6 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   23,138,694 24,530,403
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment type 1 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 0 309,031 1,634,400
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment type 2 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 287,386 457,055 248,316
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment type 3 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 1,558,144 1,822,743 1,783,574
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment type 4 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 1,695,006 3,002,913 2,941,593
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment type 5 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (1,305,293) 181,250 711,361
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Adjustment type 6 [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount $ (335,770) $ 3,268,193 $ 3,727,742