UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K


x		Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
		For the year ended December 31, 2013
o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
		For the transition period from to

Commission File number 333-159578

ATEL 14, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California		26-4695354
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Liability Company Units

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes o No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934.Yes o No x

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: Not applicable

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Not applicable

The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of February 28, 2014 was 8,386,015

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

ATEL 14, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the state of California on April 1, 2009 (“Date of Inception”) for the purpose of equipment financing and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities. The Managing Member of the Company is ATEL Managing Member, LLC (the “Managing Member” or “Manager”), a Nevada limited liability corporation. Prior to May 9, 2011, the Manager was named ATEL Associates 14, LLC. The Fund may continue until December 31, 2030. Contributions in the amount of $500 were received as of May 8, 2009, which represented the initial member’s capital investment. As a limited liability company, the liability of any individual member for the obligations of the Fund is limited to the extent of capital contributions to the Fund by the individual member.

The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. As of December 2, 2009, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million), excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors, had been received and the Fund requested subscription proceeds to be released from escrow. On that date, the Company commenced initial operations and continued in its development stage activities until transitioning to an operating enterprise during the first quarter of 2010. Pennsylvania subscriptions are subject to a separate escrow and are released to the Fund only when aggregate subscriptions for all investors equal to at least $7.5 million. Total contributions to the Fund exceeded $7.5 million on February 12, 2010, at which time a request was processed to release the Pennsylvania escrowed amounts. The offering was terminated on October 6, 2011.

As of December 31, 2013, cumulative gross contributions, less rescissions and repurchases (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs, as applicable), totaling $84.0 million (inclusive of the $500 initial Member’s capital investment) have been received. As of the same date, 8,386,015 Units were issued and outstanding.

The Fund, or Managing Member on behalf of the Fund, has incurred costs in connection with the organization, registration and issuance of the limited liability company units (Units). The amount of such costs to be borne by the Fund is limited by certain provisions of the ATEL 14, LLC amended and restated limited liability company operating agreement dated October 7, 2009 (the “Operating Agreement”).

The Company’s principal objectives are to invest in a diversified portfolio of investments that will (i) preserve, protect and return the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generate regular cash distributions to Unitholders, with any balance remaining after required minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional investments during the Reinvestment Period (ending six calendar years after the completion of the Company’s public offering of Units) and (iii) provide additional cash distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all investment portfolio assets has been sold or otherwise disposed. The Company is governed by its Operating Agreement, as amended.

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, the Managing Member and/or its affiliates receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 7 to the financial statements included in Item 8 of this report). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

Narrative Description of Business

The Company has acquired and intends to acquire various types of new and used equipment subject to leases and to make loans secured by equipment acquired by its borrowers. The Company’s primary investment objective is to acquire investments primarily in low-technology, low-obsolescence equipment such as the core operating equipment used by companies in the manufacturing, mining and transportation industries. A portion of the portfolio will include some more technology-dependent equipment such as certain types of communications equipment, medical equipment, manufacturing equipment and office equipment. The Company will also seek investments in equipment or financing of equipment and business involving “green technologies” such as those involved in the following activities: materials recycling, water purification, sewage treatment pollution radiation, gas and other emission treatment, solid waste management, renewable energy generation, as well as many other similar industries and activities.

The Company only purchases equipment under pre-existing leases or for which a lease will be entered into concurrently at the time of the purchase. Through December 31, 2013, the Company had purchased equipment with a total acquisition price of $93.2 million. The Company had also funded investments in notes receivable totaling $12.2 million through December 31, 2013.

As of the date of the final commitment of its proceeds from the sale of Units, the Company’s objective is to have at least 75% of its investment portfolio (by cost) consist of equipment leased to lessees that the Manager deems to be high quality corporate credits and/or leases guaranteed by such high quality corporate credits. High quality corporate credits are lessees or guarantors who have a credit rating by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. of “Baa3” or better, or the credit equivalent as determined by the Manager, or are public and private corporations with substantial revenues and histories of profitable operations, as well as established hospitals with histories of profitability or municipalities. The remaining 25% of the initial investment portfolio may include equipment lease transactions, real property single tenant net leases and other debt or equity financing for companies which, although deemed creditworthy by the Manager, would not satisfy the specific credit criteria for the portfolio described above. Included in this 25% of the portfolio may be growth capital financing investments. No more than 20% of the initial portfolio, by cost, will consist of these growth capital financing investments and no more than 20% of the portfolio, by cost, will consist of real estate investments. The Company’s objective is to invest approximately 25% of its capital in assets that involve “green” technologies or applications as discussed above.

During 2013 and 2012, two lessees and/or financial borrowers generated significant portions (defined as greater than or equal to 10%) of the Company’s total leasing and lending revenues, excluding gains or losses on disposition of assets, as follows:


			Percentage of Total Leasing and Lending Revenues
Lessee	Type of Equipment		2013			2012
Cummins		Materials handling		13	%		16	%
IBM Corporation		Research		12	%		20	%

These percentages are not expected to be comparable in future periods.

The equipment financing industry is highly competitive. Equipment manufacturers, corporations, partnerships and others offer users an alternative to the purchase of most types of equipment with payment terms that vary widely depending on the type of financing, the lease or loan term and type of equipment. The ability of the Company to keep the equipment leased and the terms of purchase, lease and sale of equipment depends on various factors (many of which neither the Managing Member nor the Company can control), such as general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation or recession, and fluctuations in supply and demand for various types of equipment resulting from, among other things, technological and economic obsolescence.

The Managing Member will use its best efforts to diversify lessees by geography and industry and to maintain an appropriate balance and diversity in the types of equipment acquired and the types of leases entered into by the Company, and will apply the following policies: (i) The Managing Member will seek to limit the amount invested in equipment or property leased to any single lessee to not more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of investments as of the final commitment of net offering proceeds; (ii) in no event will the Company’s equity investment in equipment or property leased to a single lessee exceed an amount equal to 20% of the maximum capital from the sale of Units (or $30,000,000); and (iii) the Managing Member will seek to invest not more than 20% of the aggregate purchase price of equipment in equipment acquired from a single manufacturer. However, this last limitation is a general guideline only, and the Company may acquire equipment from a single manufacturer in excess of the stated percentage during the offering period and before the offering proceeds are fully invested, or if the Managing Member deems such a course of action to be in the Company’s best interest.

The primary geographic regions in which the Company seeks leasing and lending opportunities are North America and Europe. Currently, 100% of the Company’s operating revenues are from customers domiciled in North America.

The business of the Company is not seasonal. The Company has no full time employees. Employees of the Managing Member and affiliates provide the services the Company requires to effectively operate. The cost of these services is reimbursed by the Company to the Managing Member and affiliates per the Operating Agreement.

Equipment Leasing Activities

The Company has acquired a diversified portfolio of equipment. The equipment has been leased to lessees in various industries. The following tables set forth the types of equipment acquired by the Company through December 31, 2013 and the industries to which the assets have been leased (dollars in thousands):


Asset Types	Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Transportation, rail	$	22,196		23.82	%
Marine		19,410		20.83	%
Manufacturing		12,995		13.94	%
Materials handling		12,994		13.94	%
Transportation		8,148		8.74	%
Construction		5,696		6.11	%
Mining		4,830		5.18	%
Research		4,766		5.11	%
Other		2,159		2.33	%
	$	93,194		100.00	%


Industry of Lessee	Purchase Price Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Acquisitions
Manufacturing	$	28,988		31.11	%
Natural gas		24,240		26.01	%
Wholesale, nondurable goods		8,910		9.56	%
Agriculture		8,743		9.38	%
Food products		4,651		4.99	%
Transportation, rail		4,220		4.53	%
Construction		2,348		2.52	%
Utilities		2,124		2.28	%
Retail		1,717		1.84	%
Lumber/Wood products		1,470		1.58	%
Waste recycling		1,227		1.32	%
Apparel/Accessories		940		1.01	%
Other		3,616		3.87	%
	$	93,194		100.00	%

From inception to December 31, 2013, the Company has disposed of certain leased assets as set forth below (in thousands):


Asset Types	Original Equipment Cost Excluding Acquisition Fees		Sale Price		Gross Rents
Manufacturing	$	6,334	$	3,874	$	2,806
Research		1,184		410		999
Materials handling		737		282		620
Transportation, rail		263		230		165
Construction		164		56		149
	$	8,682	$	4,852	$	4,739

For further information regarding the Company’s equipment lease portfolio as of December 31, 2013, see Note 6 to the financial statements, Investments in equipment and leases, net, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Notes Receivable Activities

The Company finances assets in diverse industries. The following tables set forth the types of assets financed by the Company through December 31, 2013 and the industries to which the assets have been financed (dollars in thousands):


Asset Types	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Fundings
Computer equipment	$	2,905		23.78	%
Manufacturing		2,496		20.43	%
Research		1,807		14.79	%
Vending equipment		1,000		8.19	%
Furniture & fixtures		700		5.73	%
Chemical processing		300		2.46	%
Other		3,007		24.62	%
	$	12,215		100.00	%


Industry of Borrower	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Percentage of Total Fundings
Manufacturing	$	3,950		32.34	%
Business services		2,594		21.24	%
Electronics		1,767		14.47	%
Internet Services		1,097		8.98	%
Refuse systems		1,000		8.19	%
Chemicals/Allied products		946		7.74	%
Health services		500		4.09	%
Lab equipment		361		2.95	%
	$	12,215		100.00	%

From inception to December 31, 2013, assets financed by the Company that are associated with terminated loans are as follows (in thousands):


Asset Types	Amount Financed Excluding Acquisition Fees		Disposition Proceeds		Total Payments Received
Computer equipment	$	1,625	$	333	$	1,630
Research		1,307		982		553
Vending equipment		1,000		855		351
Other		750		274		606
Other*		249		260		—
	$	4,931	$	2,704	$	3,140

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company exchanged a $260 thousand note receivable for a like amount of direct equity investment in shares of the related borrower. The amount under the “Disposition Proceeds” column represents the net book value of the note receivable at the time of the exchange. There was no gain or loss generated from the transaction.

For further information regarding the Company’s note receivable portfolio as of December 31, 2013, see Note 4 to the financial statements, Notes receivable, net, as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The Company does not own or lease any real property, plant or material physical properties other than the equipment held for lease as set forth in Item 1.

PART II

Item 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There are certain material conditions and restrictions on the transfer of Units imposed by the terms of the Operating Agreement. Consequently, there is no public market for Units and it is not anticipated that a public market for Units will develop. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

Holders

As of December 31, 2013, a total of 2,176 investors were Unitholders of record in the Company.

Unit Valuation

As noted above, there is no public market for Units and, in order to preserve the Company’s status for federal income tax purposes, the Company will not permit a secondary market or the substantial equivalent of a secondary market for the Units. In the absence of a public market for the Units, there is no currently ascertainable fair market value for the Units.

Nevertheless, in order to provide an estimated per Unit value for those Unitholders who seek valuation information, the Manager has calculated an estimated value per Unit as of December 31, 2013. The Manager estimates the Company’s per Unit value by first estimating the aggregate net asset value of the Company. The valuation does not take into account any future business activity of the Company; rather it is a snapshot view of the Fund’s portfolio as of the valuation date.

The estimated values for non-interest bearing items such as any current assets and liabilities, as well as for any investment in securities, were assumed to equal their respective reported balances, which management believes approximate their respective fair values, as adjusted for impairment. The same was applied to loans incurred under the acquisition facility since they bear variable rates of interest.

A discounted cash flow approach was used to estimate the values of notes receivable, investments in leases and non-recourse and long-term debt. Under such approach, the value of a financial instrument was estimated by calculating the present value of the instrument’s expected cash flows. The present value was determined by discounting the cash flows the instrument is expected to generate by discount rates as deemed appropriate by the Manager. In most cases, the discount rates used were based on U.S. Treasury yields reported as of the reporting date, plus a spread to account for the credit risk difference between the instrument being valued and Treasury securities. The valuation of the Company’s warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s).

After calculating the aggregate estimated net asset value of the Company, the Manager then calculated the portion of the aggregate estimated value that would be distributed to Unitholders on liquidation of the Company, and divided the total that would be so distributable by the number of outstanding Units as of the December 31, 2013 valuation date. As of December 31, 2013, the value of the Company’s assets, calculated on this basis, was approximately $10.00 per Unit.

The aforementioned valuation was performed solely for the purpose of providing an estimated liquidation value per Unit for those Unitholders who seek valuation information. It is important to note again that there is no market for the Units, and, accordingly, this value does not represent an estimate of the amount a Unitholder would receive if he were to seek to sell his Units. The Company will liquidate its assets in the ordinary course of its business and investment cycle. Furthermore, there can be no assurance as to when the Company will be fully liquidated, the amount the Company may actually receive if and when it seeks to liquidate its assets, the amount of lease payments and equipment disposition proceeds the Company will actually receive over the remaining term of the Company, or the amounts that may actually be received in distributions by Unitholders over the course of the Company’s remaining term.

Distributions

The Unitholders of record are entitled to certain distributions as provided under the Operating Agreement. The Company commenced periodic distributions in December 2009. Additional distributions have been consistently made through December 31, 2013. The rate for monthly distributions from 2013 operations was $0.075 per Unit for the period from January through December 2013. Likewise, the rate for monthly distributions from 2012 operations was $0.075 per Unit for the period from January through December 2012. The rate for each of the quarterly distributions paid in 2013 and 2012 was $0.225 per Unit.

Cash distributions were paid by the Fund to Unitholders of record as of November 30, 2013, and paid through December 31, 2013. The distributions may be characterized for tax, accounting and economic purposes as a return of capital, a return on capital (including escrow interest) or a portion of each. Generally, the portion of each cash distribution by a company which exceeds its net income for the fiscal period would constitute a return of capital. The Fund is required by the terms of its Operating Agreement to distribute the net cash flow generated by its investments in certain minimum amounts during the Reinvestment Period before it can reinvest its operating cash flow in additional portfolio assets. See the discussion in the Prospectus under “Income, Losses and Distributions — Reinvestment.” Accordingly, the amount of cash flow from Fund investments distributed to Unitholders will not be available for reinvestment in additional portfolio assets.

The cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the leases and loans acquired. During the Fund's acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund's actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the leases and loans acquired.

The following table summarizes distribution activity for the Fund on a cash basis from inception through December 31, 2013 (in thousands except for Units and Per Unit Data):


Distribution Period⁽¹⁾	Paid		Return of Capital		Distribution of Income		Total Distribution		Total Distribution per Unit⁽²⁾		Weighted Average Units Outstanding⁽³⁾
Monthly and quarterly distributions
Oct 2009 – Feb 2010 (Distribution of escrow interest)		Jan – Mar 2010	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		n/a
Dec 2009 – Dec 2010		Jan 2010 – Jan 2011		2,003		—		2,003		0.90		2,214,171
Jan 2011 – Nov 2011		Feb 2011- Dec 2011		4,855		—		4,855		0.87		5,597,722
Dec 2011 – Nov 2012		Jan – Dec 2012		7,562		—		7,562		0.90		8,400,238
Dec 2012 – Nov 2013		Jan – Dec 2013		7,550		—		7,550		0.90		8,389,923
			$	21,970	$	—	$	21,970	$	3.57


Source of distributions
Lease and loan payments received	$	19,970	90.90	%	$	—	0.00	%	$	19,970	90.90	%
Interest Income		—	0.00	%		—	0.00	%		—	0.00	%
Debt against non-cancellable firm term payments on leases and loans		2,000	9.10	%		—	0.00	%		2,000	9.10	%
	$	21,970	100.00	%	$	—	0.00	%	$	21,970	100.00	%

⁽¹⁾

Investors may elect to receive their distributions either monthly or quarterly (See ‘Timing and Method of Distributions’ on Page 73 of the Prospectus).

⁽²⁾

Total distributions per Unit represents the per Unit distribution rate for those units which were outstanding for all of the applicable periods.

⁽³⁾

Balances shown represent weighted average units for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the period from January 1 – November 30, 2011, December 1, 2011 – November 30, 2012 and December 1, 2012 – November 30, 2013, respectively.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

A smaller reporting company is not required to present selected financial data in accordance with item 301(c) of Regulation S-K.

Item 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements contained in this Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

During 2011, the Company completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Company has reinvested cash flow in excess of certain amounts required to be distributed to the Other Members and/or utilized its credit facilities to acquire additional equipment. Throughout the Reinvestment Period, which ends December 31, 2017, the Company anticipates continued reinvestment of cash flow in excess of minimum distributions and other obligations. The Company is governed by its Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (“Operating Agreement”), as amended.

The Company may continue until December 31, 2030. Periodic distributions are paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.

Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were concentrations (greater than or equal to 10% as a percentage of total equipment cost) of equipment leased to lessees and/or financed for borrowers in certain industries as follows:


	Percentage of Total Equipment Cost
Industry	2013			2012
Natural gas		27	%		*
Manufacturing		26	%		36	%
Wholesale, nondurable goods		10	%		11	%
Agriculture		*			10	%

Less than 10%


			Percentage of Total Leasing and Lending Revenues
Lessee	Type of Equipment		2013			2012
Cummins		Materials handling		13	%		16	%
IBM Corporation		Research		12	%		20	%

These percentages are not expected to be comparable in future periods due to anticipated changes in the mix of investments and/or lessees as a result of normal business activities.

It is the Company’s objective to maintain a 100% utilization rate for all equipment purchased in any given year. All equipment transactions are acquired subject to binding lease commitments, so equipment utilization is expected to remain high during the funding period and throughout the reinvestment stage. Initial lease terms of these leases are generally from 36 to 84 months, and as they expire, the Company will attempt to re-lease or sell the equipment. All of the Company’s equipment on lease was purchased in the years 2009 through 2013. The utilization percentage of existing assets under lease was 100% at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member and/or affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred.

2013 versus 2012

The Company had net income of $41 thousand and a net loss of $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Results for 2013 reflect increases in both total revenues and total operating expenses when compared to prior year.

Revenues

Total revenues for 2013 increased by $3.7 million, or 31%, as compared to prior year. The increase was largely due to the growth in operating lease revenues, unrealized gain on fair valuation of warrants, gains realized on sales and early termination of certain assets, interest income on notes receivable, and a gain realized on the sale or disposition of securities.

Operating lease revenues increased by $2.1 million largely due to revenues derived from approximately $25.5 million of operating lease assets acquired since December 31, 2012. Unrealized gain on fair valuation of warrants was higher by $784 thousand due to the addition of warrants of certain portfolio companies. Gains realized on sales and early termination of assets increased by $564 thousand primarily due to a $293 thousand gain realized on an early termination of a lease comprised of manufacturing equipment, and $183 thousand gain on the early termination of certain notes receivable.

Interest income on notes receivable increased by $195 thousand largely as a result of revenues derived from approximately $2.4 million of new notes funded at the end of 2012 through December 2013. In addition, the Company realized a $139 thousand gain on the net exercise of warrants during the current year period. There were no warrants exercised during the prior year period.

Expenses

Total operating expenses for 2013 increased by $1.8 million, or 13%, as compared to prior year. The increase in total operating expenses was largely a result of increases in depreciation expense, railcar maintenance costs, asset management fees paid to the Manager, interest expense, and costs reimbursed to the Manager. Such increases in expenses were partially offset by decreases in acquisition expense and outside services expense.

Depreciation expense increased by $1.7 million largely due to the increment of approximately $25.5 million of net equipment purchases for operating leases made since December 31, 2012. Railcar maintenance costs were higher by $195 thousand primarily due to an approximate $720 thousand growth in the Fund’s railcar portfolio since December 31, 2012 coupled with the aging of the existing railcar portfolio. Asset management fees paid to the Manager increased by $182 thousand mainly as a result of the increase in managed assets and related rents. Moreover, interest expense was higher by $178 thousand due to the $9.3 million net increase in outstanding borrowings since December 31, 2012; and, costs reimbursed to the Manager increased by $144 thousand, consistent with the Fund’s increased investments and expanded operations.

The aforementioned increases in expenses were partially offset by decreases in acquisition expense and outside services expense totaling $540 thousand and $63 thousand, respectively. Acquisition expense decreased primarily due to the reduction in costs related to identifying potential lease and funding transactions; and, outside services expense declined largely due to a decrease in business development costs.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.1 million and $9.4 million, respectively. The liquidity of the Company will vary in the future, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as distributions are made to the Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

The Company currently believes it has available adequate reserves to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Company would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. The Managing Member envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):


	2013			2012
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	9,443		$	7,157
Investing activities		(16,898	)		(29,145	)
Financing activities		1,107			7,119
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(6,348	)	$	(14,869	)

2013 versus 2012

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s primary source of liquidity has been cash flows from its portfolio of operating and direct financing lease contracts, and its investments in notes receivable. In addition, the Company utilized borrowings totaling $22.6 million and $19.9 million during the respective years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and realized $6.2 million and $128 thousand of proceeds from sales of lease assets and/or the early termination of notes receivable during the same respective years. The Company also realized $139 thousand of proceeds from the sale or disposition of investment securities during the current year. There was no such sale or disposition of investment securities in 2012.

During 2013 and 2012, cash was primarily used to purchase equipment and fund investments in notes receivable, to repay debt, and to pay distributions to both Other Members and the Managing Member. Total equipment purchased for

long-term operating and direct financing leases amounted to $25.6 million and $24.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively; while total loans funded amounted to $362 thousand and $7.0 million. Cash used to repay debt amounted to $13.2 million and $4.5 million for the respective years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012; and, distributions paid to both Other Members and the Managing Member totaled $8.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Revolving credit facility

Effective June 15, 2010, the Company participated with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate, with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders. The Credit Facility was for an amount up to $60 million and set to expire in June 2014. During January 2014, the line was increased to $75 million and the expiration extended to June 2015.

During the third quarter of 2010, the Company amended its Credit Facility with respect to the Warehouse Facility to suspend its participation in such Warehouse Facility while retaining its ability to borrow from time to time under the Acquisition Facility on the condition that it maintains with the lender (subject to certain provisions) cash collateral on deposit in an amount not less than the principal amount of loans outstanding from time to time. Commencing with the second quarter of 2011, the Company gained eligibility for full unrestricted participation under the Warehouse Facility as it was in compliance with all relevant financial covenants. At December 31, 2013, the Company has no outstanding borrowings under the acquisition facility. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $4.2 million of outstanding borrowings under the Acquisition Facility.

Compliance with covenants

The Credit Facility includes certain financial and non-financial covenants applicable to each borrower, including the Company. Such covenants include covenants typically found in credit facilities of the size and nature of the Credit Facility, such as accuracy of representations, good standing, absence of liens and material litigation, etc. The Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2013. The Company considers certain financial covenants to be material to its ongoing use of the Credit Facility and these covenants are described below.

Material financial covenants

Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain a specific tangible net worth, to comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio, and to comply with other terms expressed in the Credit Facility, including limitation on the incurrence of additional debt and guaranties, defaults, and delinquencies.

As of December 31, 2013, the material financial covenants are summarized as follows:

Minimum Tangible Net Worth: $10.0 million
Leverage Ratio (leverage to Tangible Net Worth): Not to exceed 1.25 to 1
Collateral Value: Collateral value under the Warehouse Facility must exceed outstanding borrowings under that facility
EBITDA to Interest Ratio: Not to be less than 2 to 1 for the four fiscal quarters just ended

“EBITDA” is defined under the Credit Facility as, for the relevant period of time (1) gross revenues (all payments from leases and notes receivable) for such period minus (2) expenses deducted in determining net income for such period plus (3) to the extent deducted in determining net income for such period (a) provision for income taxes and (b) interest expense, and (c) depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges. Extraordinary items and gains or losses on (and proceeds from) sales or dispositions of assets outside of the ordinary course of business are excluded in the calculation of EBITDA. “Tangible Net Worth” is defined as, as of the date of determination, (i) the net worth of the Company, after deducting there from (without duplication of deductions) the net book amount of all assets of the Company, after deducting any reserves and other amounts for assets which would be treated as intangibles under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and after certain other adjustments permitted under the agreements.

The financial covenants referred to above are applicable to the Company only to the extent that the Company has borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants

under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and (EBITDA) interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $42.9 million, 0.64 to 1, and 37.26 to 1, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. As such, as of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all such material financial covenants.

Reconciliation to GAAP of EBITDA

For purposes of compliance with the Credit Facility covenants, the Company uses a financial calculation of EBITDA, as defined therein, which is a non-GAAP financial performance measure. The EBITDA is utilized by the Company to calculate its debt covenant ratios.

The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA, as defined in the loan agreement, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 (in thousands):


Net income – GAAP basis	$	41
Interest expense		353
Depreciation and amortization		10,569
Amortization of initial direct costs		147
Provision for credit losses		15
Unrealized gain on fair valuation of warrants		(784	)
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		288
Principal payments received on notes receivable		2,524
EBITDA (for Credit Facility financial covenant calculation only)	$	13,153

Events of default, cross-defaults, recourse and security

The terms of the Credit Facility include standard events of default by the Company which, if not cured within applicable grace periods, could give lenders remedies against the Company, including the acceleration of all outstanding borrowings and a demand for repayment in advance of their stated maturity. If a breach of any material term of the Credit Facility should occur, the lenders may, at their option, increase borrowing rates, accelerate the obligations in advance of their stated maturities, terminate the facility, and exercise rights of collection available to them under the express terms of the facility, or by operation of law. The lenders also retain the discretion to waive a violation of any covenant at the Company’s request.

The Company is currently in compliance with its obligations under the Credit Facility. In the event of a technical default (e.g., the failure to timely file a required report, or a one-time breach of a financial covenant), the Company believes it has ample time to request and be granted a waiver by the lenders, or, alternatively, cure the default under the existing provisions of its debt agreements, including, if necessary, arranging for additional capital from alternate sources to satisfy outstanding obligations.

The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility.

The Acquisition Facility is generally recourse solely to the Company, and is not cross-defaulted to any other obligations of affiliated companies under the Credit Facility, except as described in this paragraph. The Credit Facility is cross-defaulted to a default in the payment of any debt (other than non-recourse debt) or any other agreement or condition beyond the period of grace (not exceeding 30 days), the effect of which would entitle the lender under such agreement to accelerate the obligations prior to their stated maturity in an individual or aggregate principal amount in excess of 15% of the Company’s consolidated Tangible Net Worth. Also, a bankruptcy of AFS will trigger a default for the Company under the Credit Facility.

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had non-recourse long-term debt totaling $25.5 million and $14.1 million, respectively. Such non-recourse notes payable do not contain any material financial covenants. The notes are secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items.

Long-Term Debt

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had long-term debt totaling $2.1 million. There was no such long-term debt as of December 31, 2012. The debt was utilized to partially fund the marine vessel and related bareboat charter purchased by the Fund and its affiliate, ATEL 15, LLC (see Note 8 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ). The full pro rata principal amount of $2.1 million plus all outstanding accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $400 thousand shall be paid in one payment of $2.5 million due on May 25, 2019. The note is recourse to the residual value of the vessel which is expected to be well in excess of the note amount. In addition, the lender has recourse to the Fund’s general assets up to $2.5 million. The note does not contain any material financial covenants and is guaranteed as a senior obligation of the Fund.

For detailed information on the Company’s debt obligations, see Notes 8 through 10 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Distributions

The Company commenced periodic distributions beginning with the month of December 2009. Additional distributions have been consistently made through December 31, 2013. See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, for additional information regarding the distributions.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, 2013, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting standards updates as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) were evaluated and determined to be not applicable to the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The policies discussed below are considered by management of the Company to be critical to an understanding of the Company’s financial statements because their application requires significantly complex or subjective judgments, decisions, or assessments, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs. The Company also states these accounting policies in the notes to the financial statements and in relevant sections in this discussion and analysis. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and for determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is being recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 84 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.

Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Income from direct financing lease transactions is reported using the financing method of accounting, in which the Company’s investment in the leased property is reported as a receivable from the lessee to be recovered through future rentals. The interest income portion of each rental payment is calculated so as to generate a constant rate of return on the net receivable outstanding.

Allowances for losses on direct financing leases are typically established based on historical charge-off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and billed and unbilled receivables. Direct financing leases are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

Direct financing leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) and deemed impaired when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of all direct finance lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related direct financing leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

The Company records all future payments of principal and interest on notes as notes receivable, which are then offset by the amount of any related unearned interest income. For financial statement purposes, the Company reports only the net amount of principal due on the balance sheet. The unearned interest is recognized over the term of the note and the income portion of each note payment is calculated so as to generate a constant rate of return on the net balance outstanding. Any fees or costs related to notes receivable are recorded as part of the net investment in notes receivable and amortized over the term of the loan.

Allowances for losses on notes receivable are typically established based on historical charge-off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified borrowers and billed and unbilled receivables. Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

Notes receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related notes may be placed on non-accrual status. Notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Initial direct costs:

The Company capitalizes initial direct costs (“IDC”) associated with the origination and funding of lease assets and investments in notes receivable. IDC includes both internal costs (e.g., the costs of employees’ activities in connection with successful lease and loan originations) and external broker fees incurred with such originations. The costs are amortized on a lease by lease (or note by note) basis based on actual lease term using a straight-line method for operating leases and the effective interest rate method for direct financing leases and notes receivable. Upon disposal of the underlying lease or loan assets, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases or notes receivable that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense.

Asset valuation:

Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the assets and its carrying value on the measurement date.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements attached hereto at pages 16 through 39.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Members
ATEL 14, LLC

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ATEL 14, LLC (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Management of the Company’s Managing Member. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ATEL 14, LLC as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


		/s/ Moss Adams LLP
San Francisco, California March 17, 2014

ATEL 14, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands)


	2013		2012
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,090	$	9,438
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15 at December 31, 2013 and $0 at December 31, 2012		239		197
Notes receivable, net of unearned interest income of $479 and allowance for credit losses of $0 at December 31, 2013 and net of unearned interest income of $1,307 and allowance for credit losses of $54 at December 31, 2012		4,299		8,060
Investment in securities		293		33
Fair value of warrants		784		—
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $20,437 at December 31, 2013 and $14,251 at December 31, 2012		63,530		53,311
Prepaid expenses and other assets		116		146
Total assets	$	72,351	$	71,185
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Managing Member	$	66	$	71
Affiliates		325		108
Accrued distributions to Other Members		816		816
Other		235		426
Deposits due lessees		25		105
Non-recourse debt		25,543		14,057
Long-term debt		2,068		—
Acquisition facility obligation		—		4,220
Unearned operating lease income		387		310
Total liabilities		29,465		20,113
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Managing Member		—		—
Other Members		42,886		51,072
Total Members’ capital		42,886		51,072
Total liabilities and Members’ capital	$	72,351	$	71,185

See accompanying notes.

ATEL 14, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)


	2013			2012
Revenues:
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases	$	13,260		$	11,177
Direct financing leases		81			91
Interest on notes receivable		746			551
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		583			19
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities		139			—
Unrealized gain on fair value of warrants		784			—
Interest income		1			—
Other		79			96
Total revenues		15,673			11,934
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets		10,569			8,881
Asset management fees to Managing Member		744			562
Acquisition expense		795			1,335
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates		1,390			1,246
Provision for credit losses		15			27
Amortization of initial direct costs		147			133
Interest expense		353			175
Professional fees		240			273
Outside services		82			145
Taxes on income and franchise fees		61			91
Bank charges		189			190
Railcar maintenance		758			563
Other		289			242
Total operating expenses		15,632			13,863
Net income (loss)	$	41		$	(1,929	)
Net income (loss):
Managing Member	$	612		$	613
Other Members		(571	)		(2,542	)
	$	41		$	(1,929	)
Net loss per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.30	)
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		8,391,064			8,397,810

See accompanying notes.

ATEL 14, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands)


	2013			2012
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	41		$	(1,929	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of assets and early termination of notes		(583	)		(19	)
Depreciation of operating lease assets		10,569			8,881
Amortization of initial direct costs		147			133
Provision for credit losses		15			27
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities		(139	)		—
Unrealized gain on fair valuation of warrants		(784	)		—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(57	)		52
Prepaid expenses and other assets		30			(63	)
Accounts payable, Managing Member		(5	)		(9	)
Accounts payable, other		(5	)		140
Accrued liabilities, affiliates		217			(200	)
Deposits due lessees		(80	)		101
Unearned operating lease income		77			43
Net cash provided by operating activities		9,443			7,157
Investing activities:
Purchases of equipment on operating leases		(25,645	)		(23,268	)
Purchases of equipment on direct financing leases		—			(919	)
Purchase of securities		—			(1	)
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable		6,215			128
Payments of initial direct costs		(57	)		(101	)
Principal payments received on direct financing leases		288			263
Note receivable advances		(362	)		(7,047	)
Proceeds from sale of securities		139			—
Principal payments received on notes receivable		2,524			1,800
Net cash used in investing activities		(16,898	)		(29,145	)
Financing activities:
Borrowings under non-recourse debt		20,527			13,672
Repayments under non-recourse debt		(9,041	)		(2,512	)
Borrowings under long-term debt		2,068			—
Borrowings under acquisition facility		—			6,220
Repayments under acquisition facility		(4,220	)		(2,000	)
Syndication costs paid to Managing Member		—			(36	)
Distributions to Other Members		(7,550	)		(7,562	)
Distributions to Managing Member		(612	)		(613	)
Repurchase or rescissions of Units		(65	)		(50	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,107			7,119
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(6,348	)		(14,869	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		9,438			24,307
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	3,090		$	9,438
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	346		$	171
Cash paid during the year for taxes	$	55		$	68
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Distributions payable to Other Members at year-end	$	816		$	816
Distributions payable to Managing Member at year-end	$	66		$	66
Exchange of note receivable for direct equity investment	$	260		$	—
Purchases of equipment on operating leases	$	—		$	187

See accompanying notes.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

As of December 31, 2013, cumulative gross contributions, less rescissions and repurchases (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs, as applicable), totaling $84.0 million (inclusive of the $500 initial member’s capital investment) have been received. As of the same date, 8,386,015 Units were issued and outstanding.

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, AFS receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (Note 7). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, changes in members’ capital, and cash flows for the years then ended, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results from operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Managing Member, events that have occurred after December 31, 2013, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasury instruments with original and/or purchased maturities of ninety days or less.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and for determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company. Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based on historical charge off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Credit risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents, operating and direct financing lease receivables, notes receivable and accounts receivable. The Company places the majority of its cash deposits in noninterest-bearing accounts with financial institutions that have no less than $10 billion in assets. Such deposits are insured up to $250 thousand. The remainder of the Funds’ cash is temporarily invested in U.S. Treasury denominated instruments. The concentration of such deposits and temporary cash investments is not deemed to create a significant risk to the Company. Accounts and notes receivable represent amounts due from lessees or borrowers in various industries, related to equipment on operating and direct financing leases or notes receivable.

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

Allowances for losses on notes receivable are typically established based on historical charge off and collection experience and the collectability of specifically identified borrowers and billed and unbilled receivables. Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

Initial direct costs:

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

the underlying lease assets and notes receivable, both the initial direct costs and the associated accumulated amortization are relieved. Costs related to leases or notes receivable that are not consummated are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs and are expensed as acquisition expense.

Acquisition expense:

Acquisition expense represents costs which include, but are not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, cost of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses and miscellaneous expenses related to the selection and acquisition of equipment which are reimbursable to the Managing Member under the terms of the Operating Agreement. As the costs are not eligible for capitalization as initial direct costs, such amounts are expensed as incurred.

Asset valuation:

Recorded values of the Company’s lease asset portfolio are periodically reviewed for impairment. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.

Segment reporting:

The Company is organized into one operating segment for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The Company’s principal decision makers are the Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The Company believes that its equipment leasing business operates as one reportable segment because: a) the Company measures profit and loss at the equipment portfolio level as a whole; b) the principal decision makers do not review information based on any operating segment other than the equipment leasing transaction portfolio; c) the Company does not maintain discrete financial information on any specific segment other than its equipment financing operations; d) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around different products and services other than equipment lease financing; and e) the Company has not chosen to organize its business around geographic areas.

The primary geographic regions in which the Company sought leasing opportunities were North America and Europe. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, 100% of the Company’s operating revenues and long-lived assets are from customers domiciled in North America.

Investment in securities:

Purchased securities
Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company exchanged a $260 thousand note receivable for a like amount of direct equity investment in shares of the borrower. The Company had $293 thousand and $33 thousand of purchased securities at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Based upon the Company’s review of its portfolio, no fair value adjustment was deemed necessary for 2013 and 2012. There were also no sales or disposition of securities in 2013 and 2012.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Warrants
Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet at the end of the period, as determined by the Managing Member. At December 31, 2013, the Company’s portfolio of warrants had an estimated fair value of $784 thousand. At December 31, 2012, the Managing Member estimated the fair value of the warrants to be nominal in amount. The Company realized $139 thousand of gains from the net exercise of warrants during the year ended December 31, 2013. There were no net exercises of warrants during 2012.

Unearned operating lease income:

The Company records prepayments on operating leases as a liability under the caption of unearned operating lease income. The liability is recorded when prepayments are received and recognized as operating lease revenue over the period to which the prepayments relate using a straight-line method.

Income Taxes:

The Company is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 701 of the Internal Revenue Code, a partnership is not subject to federal income taxes. Accordingly, the Company has provided current franchise income taxes for only those states which levy income taxes on partnerships. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the related provision for state income taxes was approximately $61 thousand and $91 thousand, respectively. The Company does not have any entity level uncertain tax positions. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions and is generally subject to examination by U.S. federal (or state and local) income tax authorities for three years from the filing of a tax return.

The tax bases of the Company’s net assets and liabilities vary from the amounts presented in these financial statements at December 31, 2013 and 2012 as follows (in thousands):


	2013		2012
Financial statement basis of net assets	$	42,886	$	51,072
Tax basis of net assets (unaudited)		39,042		50,938
Difference	$	3,844	$	134

The primary differences between the tax bases of net assets and the amounts recorded in the financial statements are the result of differences in accounting for syndication costs and differences between the depreciation methods used in the financial statements and the Company’s tax returns.

The following reconciles the net income (loss) reported in these financial statements to the loss reported on the Company’s federal tax return (unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):


	2013			2012
Net income (loss) per financial statements	$	41		$	(1,929	)
Tax adjustments (unaudited):
Adjustment to depreciation expense		(3,786	)		(6,227	)
Provision for losses and doubtful accounts		15			(27	)
Adjustments to revenues		363			303
Adjustments to gain on sales of assets		529			16
Other		(830	)		109
Loss per federal tax return (unaudited)	$	(3,668	)	$	(7,755	)

Per Unit data:

Net loss and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Other Members Units outstanding during the year.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting standards updates as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) were evaluated and determined to be not applicable to the Company.

3. Concentration of credit risk and major customers:

The Company leases equipment to lessees and provides debt financing to borrowers in diversified industries. Leases and notes receivable are subject to the Managing Member’s credit committee review. The leases and notes receivable provide for the return of the equipment to the Company upon default.


	Percentage of Total Equipment Cost
Industry	2013			2012
Natural gas		27	%		*
Manufacturing		26	%		36	%
Wholesale, nondurable goods		10	%		11	%
Agriculture		*			10	%

Less than 10%

During 2013 and 2012, certain lessees and/or financial borrowers generated significant portions (defined as greater than or equal to 10%) of the Company’s total leasing and lending revenues, excluding gains or losses on disposition of assets, as follows:


			Percentage of Total Leasing and Lending Revenues
Lessee	Type of Equipment		2013			2012
Cummins		Materials handling		13	%		16	%
IBM Corporation		Research		12	%		20	%

These percentages are not expected to be comparable in future periods due to anticipated changes in the mix of investments and/or lessees as a result of normal business activities.

4. Notes receivable, net:

The Company has various notes receivable from borrowers who have financed the purchase of equipment through the Company. As of December 31, 2013 the original terms of the notes are from 9 to 42 months with interest at rates ranging from 10.96% to 26.22% per annum. The notes are secured by the equipment financed and have maturity dates ranging from 2014 through 2016.

No notes receivable were impaired or in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2013. By comparison, none of the notes receivable were in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2012. However, as of the same date, the Company had an impaired note which was deemed impaired during the second quarter of 2012. As such, the Fund recorded a $54 thousand fair value adjustment during the second quarter of 2012 to reduce the cost basis of the impaired note. As of December 31, 2012, the estimated impairment remained unchanged. As of the same date, the note reflected a principal balance and net investment balance outstanding of $171 thousand and $117 thousand, respectively.

Prior to the end of the third quarter of 2012, past due amounts associated with the impaired note were received bringing the note receivable outstanding current at September 30, 2012. The note was returned to accrual status effective October 1, 2012. The note was subsequently settled during the first quarter of 2013 prior to its scheduled maturity resulting in a gain of $54 thousand.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. Notes receivable, net: - (continued)

As of December 31, 2013, the minimum future payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):


Year ending December 31, 2014	$	2,803
2015		1,473
2016		487
		4,763
Less: portion representing unearned interest income		(479	)
		4,284
Unamortized initial direct costs		15
Notes receivable, net	$	4,299

IDC amortization expense related to notes receivable and the Company’s operating and direct finance leases for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):


	2013		2012
IDC amortization – notes receivable	$	33	$	21
IDC amortization – lease assets		114		112
Total	$	147	$	133

5. Allowance for credit losses:

The Company’s allowance for credit losses are as follows (in thousands):


	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts							Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables					Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Operating Leases			Notes Receivable			Finance Leases		Total Allowance for Credit Losses
Balance December 31, 2011	$	—	$	—	$	27		$	—		$	—	$	27
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses		—		—		(27	)		54			—		27
Balance December 31, 2012		—		—		—			54			—		54
Provision for credit losses						15			—			—		15
Asset disposal		—		—		—			(54	)		—		(54	)
Balance December 31, 2013	$	—	$	—	$	15		$	—		$	—	$	15

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company.

Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based upon their aging and historical charge off and collection experience and the creditworthiness of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Accounts receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with lease or note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, such leases or notes may be placed in non-accrual status. Leases or notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, revenues on operating leases are recognized on a cash basis. All payments received on amounts billed under direct financing leases contracts and notes receivable are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

Financing Receivables

In addition to the allowance established for delinquent accounts receivable, the total allowance related solely to financing receivables also includes anticipated impairment charges on notes receivable and direct financing leases.

Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

The asset underlying a direct financing lease contract is considered impaired if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than its net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s allowance for credit losses (related solely to financing receivables) and its recorded investment in financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):


December 31, 2013	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	4,299¹	$	558²	$	4,857
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,299	$	558	$	4,857
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

Includes $15 of unamortized initial direct costs.

Includes $1 of unamortized initial direct costs.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)


December 31, 2012	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	54	$	—	$	54
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	54	$	—	$	54
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	8,114³	$	774⁴	$	8,888
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	8,114	$	774	$	8,888
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

Includes $31 of unamortized initial direct costs.

⁴

Includes $2 of unamortized initial direct costs.

The Company evaluates the credit quality of its financing receivables on a scale equivalent to the following quality indicators related to corporate risk profiles:

Pass — Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the Manager to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the Manager and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the manager to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.

Special Mention — Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e.g. large net losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date.

Substandard — Any account that is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that are so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Fund will sustain some loss as the likelihood of fully collecting all receivables may be questionable if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such accounts are on the Manager’s Credit Watch List.

Doubtful — Any account where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Accordingly, an account that is so classified is on the Manager’s Credit Watch List, and has been declared in default and the Manager has repossessed, or is attempting to repossess, the equipment it financed. This category includes impaired notes and leases as applicable.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (excludes initial direct costs) (in thousands):


	Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
Pass	$	4,047	$	6,567	$	557	$	772
Special mention		237		1,516		—		—
Substandard		—		—		—		—
Doubtful		—		—		—		—
Total	$	4,284	$	8,083	$	557	$	772

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):


December 31, 2013	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,284	$	4,284	$	—
Finance leases		12		—		—		12		545		557		—
Total	$	12	$	—	$	—	$	12	$	4,829	$	4,841	$	—


December 31, 2012	31 – 60 Days Past Due		61 – 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,083	$	8,083	$	—
Finance leases		—		—		—		—		772		772		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,855	$	8,855	$	—

As discussed in Note 4, the Company had no notes in non-accrual status as at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. As of December 31, 2012, the Company did, however, have a note receivable that was deemed impaired. Such impaired note was settled in the first quarter of 2013. See Note 4 for further discussion.

6. Investments in equipment and leases, net:

The Company’s investment in leases consists of the following (in thousands):


	Balance December 31, 2012		Reclassifications & Additions/ Dispositions		Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance December 31, 2013
Net investment in operating leases	$	52,257	$	21,076	$	(10,569	)	$	62,764
Net investment in direct financing leases		772		73		(288	)		557
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $254 at December 31, 2013 and $185 at December 31, 2012		282		41		(114	)		209
Total	$	53,311	$	21,190	$	(10,971	)	$	63,530

Impairment of investments in leases:

Management periodically reviews the carrying values of its lease assets for impairment. Impairment losses are recorded as an adjustment to the net investment in operating leases. No impairment losses were recorded during 2013 and 2012.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. Investments in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

The Company utilizes a straight line depreciation method over the term of the equipment lease for equipment on operating leases currently in its portfolio. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment totaled $10.6 million and $8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Initial direct costs amortization expense related to the Company’s operating and direct financing leases totaled $114 thousand and $112 thousand for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

All of the Company’s leased property was acquired during the years from 2009 through 2013.

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):


	Balance December 31, 2012			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance December 31, 2013
Transportation, rail	$	21,322		$	720		$	(109	)	$	21,933
Marine vessel		—			19,410			—			19,410
Materials handling		11,602			690			(361	)		11,931
Transportation		7,820			208			—			8,028
Manufacturing		12,283			1,462			(7,084	)		6,661
Construction		5,558			—			—			5,558
Mining		4,830			—			(26	)		4,804
Research		2,391			2,250			(1,184	)		3,457
Agriculture		588			263			—			851
Office automation		—			322			—			322
Air support equipment		—			120			—			120
Other		113			13			—			126
		66,507			25,458			(8,764	)		83,201
Less accumulated depreciation		(14,250	)		(10,569	)		4,382			(20,437	)
Total	$	52,257		$	14,889		$	(4,382	)	$	62,764

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 38% of the assets’ original cost at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. There were no operating leases in non-accrual status at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company and its affiliate, ATEL 15, LLC, acquired a 100% interest in a marine vessel and related bareboat charter guaranteed by the lessee — one of the world's largest providers of products and services to the energy industry. The new lease asset was funded, in part, by utilizing $23.9 million of new non-recourse debt and $4.1 million of long-term debt. The Fund has a 50% interest in the new lease asset and accompanying charter and assumed 50% of the new debt.

Direct financing leases:

As of December 31, 2013, investment in direct financing leases consists of various types of computer-related, research, materials handling and cleaning and maintenance equipment. As of December 31, 2012, investment in direct financing leases consists of various types of computer-related, research and materials handling equipment. The components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):


	2013			2012
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	609		$	867
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		11			17
Investment in direct financing leases		620			884
Less unearned income		(63	)		(112	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	557		$	772

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. Investments in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no investments in direct financing leases in non-accrual status.

At December 31, 2013, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):


	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
Year ending December 31, 2014	$	12,684	$	348	$	13,032
2015		9,166		248		9,414
2016		5,443		13		5,456
2017		4,532		—		4,532
2018		3,541		—		3,541
Thereafter		1,004		—		1,004
	$	36,370	$	609	$	36,979

7. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that the Managing Member and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by the Managing Member and/or affiliates for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. The Managing Member is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of investments.

Each of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”) and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group, Inc. and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member or its affiliates are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as total assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Managing Member believes that the costs reimbursed are the lower of (i) actual costs incurred on behalf of the Company or (ii) the amount the Company would be required to pay independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location.

The Managing Member and/or affiliates earned commissions and received cost reimbursements, pursuant to the Operating Agreement, during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 as follows (in thousands):


	2013		2012
Administrative costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	1,390	$	1,246
Asset management fees to Managing Member		744		562
Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member		852		1,402
Reimbursement of other syndication costs to Managing Member and/or affiliates, deducted from Other Members capital		—		14
	$	2,986	$	3,224

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8. Non-recourse debt:

At December 31, 2013, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The notes are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes is at fixed rates ranging from 1.37% to 4.40% per annum. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At December 31, 2013, gross operating lease rentals totaled approximately $26.9 million over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $41.8 million. The notes mature at various dates from 2014 through 2019.

The non-recourse debt does not contain any material financial covenants. The debt is secured by a specific lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lender on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lender has recourse only to the following collateral: the leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security and the Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lender, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties' signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company's good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):


	Principal		Interest		Total
Year ending December 31, 2014	$	7,938	$	541	$	8,479
2015		5,587		376		5,963
2016		4,027		263		4,290
2017		3,820		162		3,982
2018		3,175		71		3,246
Thereafter		996		8		1,004
	$	25,543	$	1,421	$	26,964

9. Long-term debt:

As of December 31, 2013, the $2.1 million of long-term debt consists of a note payable to a lender. Such debt was utilized to partially fund the marine vessel and related bareboat charter purchased by the Fund and its affiliate, ATEL 15, LLC (see Note 8). The note bears interest at a fixed-rate of 3.5% per annum, to accrue in arrears on a monthly basis. The full pro rata principal amount of $2.1 million plus all outstanding accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $400 thousand shall be paid in one payment of $2.5 million due on May 25, 2019.The note is recourse to the residual value of the vessel which is expected to be well in excess of the note amount. In addition, the lender has recourse to the Fund’s general assets up to $2.5 million. The note does not contain any material financial covenants and is guaranteed as a senior obligation of the Fund.

10. Borrowing facilities:

The Company participates with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate,

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. Borrowing facilities: - (continued)

with a syndicate of financial institutions as lenders, and which Credit Facility includes certain financial covenants. The Credit Facility was for an amount up to $60 million and set to expire in June 2014. During January 2014, the line was increased to $75 million and the expiration extended to June 2015. The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, borrowings under the facility were as follows (in thousands):


	2013			2012
Total available under the financing arrangement	$	60,000		$	60,000
Amount borrowed by the Company under the acquisition facility		—			(4,220	)
Amounts borrowed by affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies under the venture, acquisition and warehouse facilities		(7,310	)		(1,270	)
Total remaining available under the venture, acquisition and warehouse facilities	$	52,690		$	54,510

The Company and its affiliates pay an annual commitment fee to have access to this line of credit. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of the Credit Facility is potentially available to the Company, subject to certain sub-facility and borrowing-base limitations. However, as amounts are drawn on the Credit Facility by each of the Company and the affiliates who are borrowers under the Credit Facility, the amount remaining available to all borrowers to draw under the Credit Facility is reduced. As the Warehousing Facility is a short term bridge facility, any amounts borrowed under the Warehousing Facility, and then repaid by the affiliated borrowers (including the Company) upon allocation of an acquisition to a specific purchaser, become available under the Warehouse Facility for further short term borrowing.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s Tangible Net Worth requirement under the Credit Facility was $10.0 million, the permitted maximum leverage ratio was not to exceed 1.25 to 1, and the required minimum interest coverage ratio was not to be less than 2 to 1. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $42.9 million, 0.64 to 1, and 37.26 to 1, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. As such, as of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all material financial covenants, and with all other material conditions of the Credit Facility. The Company does not anticipate any covenant violations nor does it anticipate that any of these covenants will restrict its operations or its ability to procure additional financing.

Fee and interest terms

The interest rate on the Credit Facility is based on either the LIBOR/Eurocurrency rate of 1-, 2-, 3- or 6-month maturity plus a lender designated spread, or the bank’s Prime rate, which re-prices daily. Principal amounts of loans made under the Credit Facility that are prepaid may be re-borrowed on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth under the Credit Facility. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2013 as all outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility had been repaid in January 2013. At December 31, 2012, outstanding borrowings under the Acquisition Facility totaled $4.2 million. The weighted average rate of borrowings as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were 3.30% and 3.43%, respectively.

Warehouse facility

To hold the assets under the Warehousing Facility prior to allocation to specific investor programs, a Warehousing Trust has been entered into by the Company, AFS, ALC, and certain of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies.

The Warehousing Trust is used by the Warehouse Facility borrowers to acquire and hold, on a short-term basis, certain lease transactions that meet the investment objectives of each of such entities. Each of the leasing programs sponsored

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. Borrowing facilities: - (continued)

by AFS and ALC currently in its acquisition stage is a pro rata participant in the Warehousing Trust, as described below. When a program no longer has a need for short term financing provided by the Warehousing Facility, it is removed from participation, and as new leasing investment entities are formed by AFS and ALC and commence their acquisition stages, these new entities are added.

As of December 31, 2013, the investment program participants were ATEL 12, LLC, the Company and ATEL 15, LLC. Pursuant to the Warehousing Trust, the benefit of the lease transaction assets, and the corresponding liabilities under the Warehouse Facility, inure to each of such entities based upon each entity’s pro-rata share in the Warehousing Trust estate. The “pro-rata share” is calculated as a ratio of the net worth of each entity over the aggregate net worth of all entities benefiting from the Warehousing Trust estate, excepting that the trustees, AFS and ALC, are both jointly and severally liable for the pro-rata portion of the obligations of each of the affiliated limited liability companies participating under the Warehouse Facility. Transactions are financed through this Warehouse Facility only until the transactions are allocated to a specific program for purchase or are otherwise disposed by AFS and ALC. When a determination is made to allocate the transaction to a specific program for purchase by the program, the purchaser repays the debt associated with the asset, either with cash or by means of proceeds of a draw under the Acquisition Facility, and the asset is removed from the Warehouse Facility collateral, and ownership of the asset and any debt obligation associated with the asset are assumed solely by the purchasing entity.

There were no borrowings under the Warehouse Facility as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

11. Commitments:

At December 31, 2013, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets and fund investments in notes receivable.

12. Guarantees:

The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

13. Members’ capital:

A total of 8,386,015 and 8,395,515 Units were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, including the 50 Units issued to the initial Member (Managing Member). The Fund was authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 total Units.

The Company has the right, exercisable at the Managing Member’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Managing Member on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Managing Member deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. Members’ capital: - (continued)

The Fund’s net income or net losses are to be allocated 100% to the Members. From the commencement of the Fund until the initial closing date, net income and net loss were allocated 99% to the Managing Member and 1% to the initial Other Members. Commencing with the initial closing date, net income and net loss are to be allocated 92.5% to the Other Members and 7.5% to the Managing Member.

Fund distributions are to be allocated 7.5% to the Managing Member and 92.5% to the Other Members. Distributions to the Other Members for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (in thousands except Units and per Unit data):


	2013		2012
Distributions declared	$	7,550	$	7,557
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		8,391,064		8,397,810
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	0.90	$	0.90

Cash distributions were based on current and anticipated gross revenues from the leases and loans acquired. During the Fund's acquisition and operating stages, the Fund may incur short term borrowing to fund regular distributions of such gross revenues to be generated by newly acquired transactions during their respective initial fixed terms. As such, all Fund periodic cash distributions made during these stages have been, and are expected in the future to be, based on the Fund's actual and anticipated gross revenues to be generated from the binding initial terms of the leases and loans acquired.

14. Fair value measurements:

Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, generally on a national exchange.

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

At December 31, 2013, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. As of the same date, there were no non-recurring fair value adjustments. No assets or liabilities required measurement at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012; however, the Company recorded non-recurring adjustments to reflect the fair value of an impaired note during 2012. Amounts at December 31, 2012 reflect the fair value of the then existing impaired assets.

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

14. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Such fair value adjustments utilized the following methodology:

Warrants (recurring)

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of December 31, 2013, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $784 thousand. Such valuation is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. As of December 31, 2012, the Managing Member estimated the fair value of the warrants to be nominal in amount.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands):


	Level 3 assets
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	—
Unrealized gain on warrants, net recorded during the year		784
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	784

Impaired notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable, when impairment adjustments are required, is estimated using either third party appraisals or estimations of the value of collateral (for collateral dependent loans) or discounted cash flow analyses (by discounting estimated future cash flows) using the effective interest rate contained in the terms of the original loan. The Company had no fair value adjustments relative to impaired notes receivable during 2013.

During 2012, the Company recorded a $54 thousand fair value adjustment to reduce the cost basis of an impaired note. The fair value adjustment was non-recurring and was based upon an estimated valuation of underlying collateral. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of the impaired notes receivable is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs from third party appraisers that utilize current market transactions as adjusted for certain factors specific to the underlying collateral. The note was subsequently settled during the first quarter of 2013, prior to its scheduled maturity.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):


	December 31, 2012		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired notes receivable, net	$	117	$	—	$	—	$	117

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

14. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The following table summarizes the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring fair value calculation categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2013:


Name	Valuation Frequency	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range of Input Values
Warrants	Recurring	Black-Scholes Model	Stock price Exercise price Time to maturity (in years) Risk-free interest rate Annualized volatility	$0.04 – $1,000.00 $0.04 – $1000.00 2.62 – 9.46 0.61% – 2.94% 17.80% – 100.00%

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company determines the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is estimated using either third party appraisals of collateral or discounted cash flow analyses based upon current market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, with credit risk or estimated collateral liquidation adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment.

Non-recourse and Long-term debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse and long-term debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Borrowings

Borrowings include the outstanding amounts on the Company’s acquisition facility. The carrying amount of these variable rate obligations approximate fair value based on current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowings.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that no recognition for the fair value of the Company’s loan commitments is necessary because their terms are made on a market rate basis and require borrowers to be in compliance with the Company’s credit requirements at the time of funding.

The fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

14. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,090	$	3,090	$	—	$	—	$	3,090
Notes receivable, net		4,299		—		—		4,299		4,299
Investment in securities		293		—		—		293		293
Fair value of warrants		784		—		—		784		784
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		25,543		—		—		25,374		25,374
Long-term debt		2,068		—		—		2,056		2,056


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,438	$	9,438	$	—	$	—	$	9,438
Notes receivable, net		8,060		—		—		8,060		8,060
Investment in securities		33		—		—		33		33
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		14,057		—		—		14,079		14,079
Borrowings		4,220		—		—		4,220		4,220

Item 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

Item 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s Managing Member’s Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Management of the Managing Member is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) for the Company, and for performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. The internal control process of the Managing Member, as it is applicable to the Company, was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of the Management of the Managing Member; and

(2)

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All internal control processes, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those processes determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management of the Managing Member assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, Management of the Managing Member concluded that the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, was effective as of December 31, 2013.

PART III

Item 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The registrant is a Limited Liability Company and has no officers or directors.

ATEL Managing Member, LLC (the “Managing Member” or “Manager”) is the Company’s Managing Member. The Managing Member is controlled by ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group (“ACG” or “ATEL”). The outstanding voting capital stock of ATEL is owned 100% by Dean L. Cash.

Each of AFS and ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ACG and performs services for the Company on behalf of the Managing Member. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations and communications services, and general administrative services are performed by AFS. ATEL Securities Corporation (“ASC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AFS, performs distribution services in connection with the Company’s public offering of its Units.

The officers and directors of ATEL and its affiliates are as follows:


Dean L. Cash		Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Paritosh K. Choksi		Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)
Vasco H. Morais		Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

Dean L. Cash, age 63, became chairman, president and chief executive officer of ATEL in April 2001. Mr. Cash joined ATEL as director of marketing in 1980 and served as a vice president since 1981, executive vice president since 1983 and a director since 1984. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Cash was a senior marketing representative for Martin Marietta Corporation, data systems division, from 1979 to 1980. From 1977 to 1979, he was employed by General Electric Corporation, where he was an applications specialist in the medical systems division and a marketing representative in the information services division. Mr. Cash was a systems engineer with Electronic Data Systems from 1975 to 1977, and was involved in maintaining and developing software for commercial applications. Mr. Cash received a B.S. degree in psychology and mathematics in 1972 and an M.B.A. degree with a concentration in finance in 1975 from Florida State University. Mr. Cash is an arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association and is qualified as a registered principal with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Paritosh K. Choksi, age 60, joined ATEL in 1999 as a director, senior vice president and its chief financial officer. He became its executive vice president and CFO/COO in April 2001. Prior to joining ATEL, Mr. Choksi was chief financial officer at Wink Communications, Inc. from 1997 to 1999. From 1977 to 1997, Mr. Choksi was with Phoenix American Incorporated, a financial services and management company, where he held various positions during his tenure, and was senior vice president, chief financial officer and director when he left the company. Mr. Choksi was involved in all corporate matters at Phoenix and was responsible for Phoenix’s capital market needs. He also served on the credit committee overseeing all corporate investments, including its venture lease portfolio. Mr. Choksi was a part of the executive management team which caused Phoenix’s portfolio to increase from $50 million in assets to over $2 billion. Mr. Choksi is a member of the board of directors of Syntel, Inc. Mr. Choksi received a bachelor of technology degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay; and an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley.

Vasco H. Morais, age 55, joined ATEL in 1989 as general counsel. Mr. Morais manages ATEL’s legal department, which provides legal and contractual support in the negotiating, documenting, drafting, reviewing and funding of lease transactions. In addition, Mr. Morais advises on general corporate law matters, and assists on securities law issues. From 1986 to 1989, Mr. Morais was employed by the BankAmeriLease Companies, Bank of America’s equipment leasing subsidiaries, providing in-house legal support on the documentation of tax-oriented and non-tax oriented direct and leveraged lease transactions, vendor leasing programs and general corporate matters. Prior to the BankAmeriLease Companies, Mr. Morais was with the Consolidated Capital Companies in the Corporate and Securities Legal Department involved in drafting and reviewing contracts, advising on corporate law matters and securities law issues. Mr. Morais received a B.A. degree in 1982 from the University of California in Berkeley, a J.D. degree in 1986 from

Golden Gate University Law School; and an M.B.A. (Finance) degree from Golden Gate University in 1997. Mr. Morais, an active member of the State Bar of California since 1986, served as co-chair of the Uniform Business Law Section of the State Bar of California and was inducted as a fellow of the American College of Commercial Finance Lawyers in 2010.

Audit Committee

The board of directors of the Managing Member acts as the audit committee of the Company. Dean L. Cash and Paritosh K. Choksi are members of the board of directors of the Managing Member and are deemed to be financial experts. They are not independent of the Company.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, the Company is not aware of any failures to file reports of beneficial ownership required to be filed during or for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Code of Ethics

A Code of Ethics that is applicable to the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of its Manager, ATEL Managing Member, LLC, or persons acting in such capacity on behalf of the Company, is included as Exhibit 14.1 to this report.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The registrant has no officers or directors.

Set forth hereinafter is a description of the nature of remuneration paid and to be paid to the Manager and its affiliates. The amount of such remuneration paid for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is set forth in Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions,” at Note 7 thereof, which information is hereby incorporated by reference.

Asset Management Fee and Carried Interest

The Company pays the Manager an annual Asset Management Fee in an amount equal to 4% of Gross Operating Lease Revenues and Cash from Sales or Refinancing. The Asset Management Fee is paid on a monthly basis. The amount of the Asset Management Fee payable in any year is reduced for that year to the extent it would otherwise exceed the Asset Management Fee Limit, as described below. The Asset Management Fee is paid for services rendered by the Manager and its affiliates in determining portfolio and investment strategies and generally managing or supervising the management of the investment portfolio.

AFS supervises performance of all management activities, including, among other activities: the acquisition and financing of the investment portfolio, collection of lease and loan revenues, monitoring compliance by lessees borrowers with their contract terms, assuring that investment assets are being used in accordance with all operative contractual arrangements, paying operating expenses and arranging for necessary maintenance and repair of equipment and property in the event a lessee fails to do so, monitoring property, sales and use tax compliance and preparation of operating financial data. AFS intends to delegate all or a portion of its duties and the Asset Management Fee to one or more of its affiliates who are in the business of providing such services.

The Manager also receives, as its Carried Interest, an amount equal to 7.5% of all Company Distributions.

Limitations on Fees

The Fund has adopted a single Asset Management Fee plus the Carried Interest as a means of compensating the Manager for sponsoring the Fund and managing its operations. While this compensation structure is intended to simplify management compensation for purposes of investor's understanding, state securities administrators use a more complicated compensation structure in their review of equipment program offerings in order to assure that those offerings are fair under the states' merit review guidelines. The total of all Front End Fees, the Carried Interest and the Asset Management Fee will be subject to the Asset Management Fee Limit in order to assure these state administrators that the Fund will not bear greater fees than permitted under the state merit review guidelines. The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (“NASAA”) is an organization of state securities administrators, those state government agencies responsible for qualifying securities offerings in their respective states. NASAA has established

standards for the qualification of a number of different types of securities offerings and investment products, including its Statement of Policy on Equipment Programs (the “NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines”). Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines establish the standards for payment of reasonable carried interests, promotional interests and fees for equipment acquisition, management, resale and releasing services to equipment leasing program sponsors. Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines set the maximum compensation payable to the sponsor and its affiliates from an equipment leasing program such as the Fund. The Asset Management Fee Limit will equal the maximum compensation payable under Article IV, Sections C through G of the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines as in effect on the date of the Fund's prospectus (the “NASAA Fee Limitation”). Under the Asset Management Fee Limit, the Fund will calculate the maximum fees payable under the NASAA Fee Limitation and guarantee that the Asset Management Fee it will pay the Manager and its Affiliates, when added to its Carried Interest, will never exceed the fees and interests payable to a sponsor and its affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation.

Asset Management Fee Limit. The Asset Management Fee Limit will be calculated each year during the Fund's term by calculating the total fees that would be paid to the Manager if the Manager were to be compensated on the basis of the maximum compensation payable under the NASAA Fee Limitation, including the Manager's Carried Interest, as described below. To the extent that the amount paid as Front End Fees, the Asset Management Fee, and the Carried Interest for any year would cause the total fees to exceed the aggregate amount of fees calculated under the NASAA Fee Limitation for the year, the Asset Management Fee and/or Carried Interest for that year will be reduced to equal the maximum aggregate fees under the NASAA Fee Limitation. To the extent any such fees are reduced, the amount of such reduction will be accrued and deferred, and such accrued and deferred compensation would be paid to the Manager in a subsequent period, but only to the extent that the deferred compensation would be within the Asset Management Fee Limit for that later period. Any deferred fees that cannot be paid under the applicable limitations through the date of liquidation would be forfeited by the Manager at liquidation.

Under the NASAA Equipment Leasing Guidelines, the Fund is required to commit a minimum percentage of the Gross Proceeds to Investment in Equipment, calculated as the greater of: (i) 80% of the Gross Proceeds reduced by 0.0625% for each 1% of indebtedness encumbering the Fund's equipment; or (ii) 75% of such Gross Proceeds. The Fund intends to incur total indebtedness equal to 50% of the aggregate cost of its equipment. The Operating Agreement requires the Fund to commit at least 85.875% of the Gross Proceeds to Investment in Equipment. Based on the formula in the NASAA Guidelines, the Fund's minimum Investment in Equipment would equal 76.875% of Gross Proceeds (80% - [50% x .0625%] = 76.875%), and the Fund's minimum Investment in Equipment would therefore exceed the NASAA Fee Limitation minimum by 9%.

The amount of the Carried Interest permitted the Manager under the NASAA Fee Limitation will be dependent on the amount by which the percentage of Gross Proceeds the Fund ultimately commits to Investment in Equipment exceeds the minimum Investment in Equipment under the NASAA Fee Limitation. The NASAA Fee Limitation permits the Manager and its Affiliates to receive compensation in the form of a carried interest in Fund Net Income, Net Loss and Distributions equal to 1% for the first 2.5% of excess Investment in Equipment over the NASAA Guidelines minimum, 1% for the next 2% of such excess, and 1% for each additional 1% of excess Investment in Equipment. With a minimum Investment in Equipment of 85.875%, the Manager and its Affiliates may receive an additional carried interest equal to 6.5% of Net Profit, Net Loss and Distributions under the foregoing formula (2.5% + 2% + 4.5% = 9%; 1% + 1% + 4.5% = 6.5%). At the lowest permitted level of Investment in Equipment, the NASAA Guidelines would permit the Manager and its Affiliates to receive a promotional interest equal to 5% of Distributions of Cash from Operations and 1% of Distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds until Members have received total Distributions equal to their Original Invested Capital plus an 8% per annum cumulative return on their Adjusted Invested Capital, and, thereafter, the promotional interest may increase to 15% of all Distributions.

With the additional carried interest calculated as described above, the maximum aggregate fees payable to the Manager and Affiliates under the NASAA Guidelines as carried interest and promotional interest would equal 11.5% of Distributions of Cash from Operations (6.5% + 5% = 11.5%), and 7.5% of Distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds (6.5% + 1% = 7.5%), before the subordination level was reached, and 21.5% of all Distributions thereafter. The maximum amounts to be paid under the terms of the Operating Agreement are subject to the application of the Asset Management Fee Limit provided in Section 8.3 of the Agreement, which limits the annual amount payable to the Manager and its Affiliates as the Asset Management Fee and the Carried Interest to an aggregate not to exceed the total amount of fees that would be payable to the Manager and its Affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation.

Upon completion of the offering of Units, final commitment of offering proceeds to acquisition of equipment and establishment of final levels of permanent portfolio debt, the Manager will calculate the maximum carried interest and promotional interest payable to the Manager and its Affiliates under the NASAA Fee Limitation and compare such total permitted fees to the total of the Asset Management Fee and Manager's Carried Interest. If and to the extent that the

Asset Management Fee and Manager's Carried Interest would exceed the fees calculated under the NASAA Fee Limitation, the fees payable to the Manager and its Affiliates will be reduced by an amount sufficient to cause the total of such compensation to comply with the NASAA Fee Limitation. The adjusted Asset Management Fee Limit will then be applied to the Asset Management Fee and Carried Interest as described above. A comparison of the Front End Fees actually paid by the Fund and the NASAA Fee Limitation maximums will be repeated, and any required adjustments will be made, at least annually thereafter.

See Note 7 to the financial statements as set forth in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for amounts paid.

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

At December 31, 2013, no investor is known to hold beneficially more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Units.

Security Ownership of Management

The parent of ATEL Managing Member, LLC is the beneficial owner of Limited Liability Company Units as follows:


(1) Title of Class	(2) Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	(3) Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	(4) Percent of Class
Limited Liability Company Units	ATEL Financial Services, LLC The Transamerica Pyramid 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111	Initial Limited Liability Company Units 50 Units ($500)	0.0003%

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

See Item 8 of this report under the caption “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Notes to Financial Statements — Related party transactions” at Note 7 thereof.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred audit and/or other fees with its principal auditors as follows (in thousands):


	2013		2012
Audit fees	$	173	$	238
Other fees		5		—
	$	178	$	238

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Other fees represent costs incurred in connection with various Agreed-Upon Procedures engagements.

The board of directors of the Managing Member acts as the audit committee of the registrant. Engagements for audit services, audit related services and tax services are approved in advance by the Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Member acting on behalf of the board of directors of the Managing Member in its role as the audit committee of the Company.

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

Financial Statements and Schedules

Financial Statements


Included in Part II of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			16
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012			17
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012			18
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012			19
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012			20
Notes to Financial Statements			21

Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(b)

Exhibits

(3) and (4) Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement, included as exhibit B to the Prospectus effective October 7, 2009 as filed on October 8, 2009 (File Number 333-159578) is hereby incorporated herein by reference

(14.1)

Code of Ethics

(31.1)

Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

(31.2)

Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

(32.1)

Certification of Dean L. Cash pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350

(32.2)

Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350

(101.INS)

XBRL Instance Document

(101.SCH)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

(101.CAL)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

(101.LAB)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

(101.PRE)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(101.DEF)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 17, 2014

ATEL 14, LLC (Registrant)

By:

ATEL Managing Member, LLC
Managing Member of Registrant

By:

/s/ Dean L. Cash
Dean L. Cash,
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC,
(Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
Paritosh K. Choksi,
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC
(Managing Member)

By:

/s/ Samuel Schussler
Samuel Schussler,
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


SIGNATURE	CAPACITIES	DATE
/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC, (Managing Member)	March 17, 2014
/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi	Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)	March 17, 2014
/s/ Samuel Schussler Samuel Schussler	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Managing Member, LLC (Managing Member)	March 17, 2014

No proxy materials have been or will be sent to security holders. An annual report will be furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this report on Form 10-K, and copies thereof will be furnished supplementally to the Commission when forwarded to the security holders.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File number 333-159578

ATEL 14, LLC

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

Narrative Description of Business

Equipment Leasing Activities

Notes Receivable Activities

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

PART II

Market Information

Holders

Unit Valuation

Distributions

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Overview

2013 versus 2012

Revenues

Expenses

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Cash Flows

2013 versus 2012

Revolving credit facility

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

Long-Term Debt

Distributions

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Use of estimates:

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

Initial direct costs:

Asset valuation:

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ATEL 14, LLC BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 (In Thousands)

ATEL 14, LLC STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 14, LLC STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 14, LLC STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 (In Thousands)

ATEL 14, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

ATEL 14, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Use of Estimates:

Accounts receivable:

Credit risk:

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

ATEL 14, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Direct financing leases and related revenue recognition:

Notes receivable, unearned interest income and related revenue recognition:

Initial direct costs:

ATEL 14, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Acquisition expense:

Asset valuation:

Segment reporting:

Investment in securities:

ATEL 14, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Unearned operating lease income:

Income Taxes:

Per Unit data:

ATEL 14, LLC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

3. Concentration of credit risk and major customers:

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

ATEL 14, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands)

ATEL 14, LLC

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 14, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands Except for Units and Per Unit Data)

ATEL 14, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(In Thousands)

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATEL 14, LLC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS