XML 36 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Debt, Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Debt, Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Debt, Commitments and Contingencies
Debt, Commitments and Contingencies
The debt, commitments and contingencies described below are currently in effect and would require us, or our subsidiaries, to make payments to third parties under certain circumstances.
Debt
Prior Facility
In 2011, we entered into a Loan & Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB"). We borrowed $10.0 million under a term loan (the "Prior Facility") to be repaid in sixty monthly installments of principal and accrued interest. We had the option to prepay the Prior Facility without penalty provided that the Prior Facility had been outstanding for two or more years. Absent a prepayment, the Prior Facility would have terminated on the date of the last required principal payment, which was December 1, 2016. This facility was extinguished and repaid in May 2014.
2014 Facility
On May 8, 2014, we repaid all of the outstanding principal and interest under the Prior Facility, which was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt, and replaced it with a $50.0 million revolving credit facility (the “2014 Facility”) with SVB, as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders. We utilized $6.7 million under the 2014 Facility to repay in full our indebtedness under the Prior Facility. The 2014 Facility includes an option to increase the borrowing capacity available under the 2014 Facility to $75.0 million with the consent of the lenders. The 2014 Facility is available to us to finance working capital and certain permitted acquisitions and investments, and is secured by substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property. The principal outstanding under the 2014 Facility is due upon maturity in May 2017.
The outstanding principal balance on the 2014 Facility accrues interest at a rate equal to either (1) the Eurodollar Base Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or (2) the higher of (a) the Wall Street Journal prime rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or ABR, at our option. Borrowings under LIBOR rates accrue interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%, LIBOR plus 2.5%, and LIBOR plus 2.75% when our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 1.00:1.00 but less than 2.00:1.00, and greater than or equal to 2.00:1.00, respectively. Borrowings under ABR rates accrue interest at ABR plus 1.25%, ABR plus 1.5%, and ABR plus 1.75% when our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 1.00:1.00 but less than 2.00:1.00, and greater than or equal to 2.00:1.00, respectively. The 2014 Facility also carries an unused line commitment fee of 0.20% to 0.25% depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the effective interest rate on the 2014 Facility was 2.63%. The carrying value of 2014 Facility was $6.7 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. The 2014 Facility includes a variable interest rate that approximates market and, as such, we determined that the carrying amount of the 2014 Facility approximates its fair value.
On December 7, 2015, we amended the 2014 Facility. The amendment reduces the rate at which borrowings under LIBOR rates accrue interest to LIBOR plus 2.00%, LIBOR plus 2.25%, and LIBOR plus 2.50% when our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 1.00:1.00 but less than 2.00:1.00, and greater than or equal to 2.00:1.00, respectively. Borrowings under ABR rates accrue interest at ABR plus 1.00%, ABR plus 1.25%, and ABR plus 1.50% when our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.00:1.00, greater than or equal to 1.00:1.00 but less than 2.00:1.00, and greater than or equal to 2.00:1.00, respectively. 
The 2014 Facility contains various financial and other covenants that require us to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 2.50:1.00 and a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.25:1.00. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants and there were no events of default.
Commitments and Contingencies
Repurchase of Subsidiary Units
In 2012, we formed a subsidiary to develop and market home and commercial energy management devices and services. We granted an award of subsidiary stock to the founder and president. The terms of the award for the founder, who is also our employee, require a payment in cash on either the third or the fourth anniversary from the date the subsidiary first makes its products and services commercially available, which was determined to be April 1, 2014. The vesting of the award is based on the subsidiary meeting certain minimum financial targets. We recorded a liability of $0.1 million and $0 million related to this commitment in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
In 2011, we formed a subsidiary that offers to professional residential property management and vacation rental management companies technology solutions for remote monitoring and control of properties, including access control and energy management. We granted an award of subsidiary stock to the founder and president. The terms of the award for the founder, who is our employee, require a payment in cash between the fourth and sixth anniversary of the date that the subsidiary’s products and services first become commercially available, which was determined to be June 1, 2013. The vesting of the award is based on the subsidiary meeting certain minimum financial targets. We have recorded a liability of $0.4 million and $0.2 million related to the commitment in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
At each reporting date until the respective payment dates, we will remeasure these liabilities, and we will record any changes in fair value in general and administrative expense. The liability balances are included in our other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Leases
We lease office space and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with various expiration dates through 2026. In August 2014, we signed a lease for new office space to relocate our headquarters to Tysons, Virginia. The relocation occurred in February 2016. The lease term ends in 2026 and the lease includes one five-year renewal option, an $8.0 million tenant improvement allowance and scheduled rent increases. As of December 31, 2015, we have utilized $5.6 million of the tenant improvement allowance. Rent expense was $4.9 million, $2.8 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
The following table presents the future minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Year ending December 31
 
Minimum Lease Payments
2016
 
$
3,221

2017
 
4,051

2018
 
4,145

2019
 
3,908

2020
 
3,981

2021 and thereafter
 
21,072

 
 
$
40,378


Indemnification Agreements
We have various agreements that may obligate us to indemnify the other party to the agreement with respect to certain matters. Generally, these indemnification provisions are included in contracts arising in the normal course of business. Although we cannot predict the maximum potential amount of future payments that may become due under these indemnification agreements, we do not believe any potential liability that might arise from such indemnity provisions is probable or material.
Legal Proceedings
On June 2, 2015, Vivint, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us in U.S. District Court, District of Utah, alleging that our technology directly and indirectly infringes six patents that Vivint purchased. Vivint is seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions, enhanced damages and attorney’s fees. We answered the complaint on July 23, 2015. Among other things, we asserted defenses based on non-infringement and invalidity of the patents in question. Should Vivint prevail on its claims that one or more elements of our solution infringe one or more of its patents, we could be required to pay damages of Vivint’s lost profits and/or a reasonable royalty for sales of our solution, enjoined from making, using and selling our solution if a license or other right to continue selling such elements is not made available to us or we are unable to design around such patents, and required to pay ongoing royalties and comply with unfavorable terms if such a license is made available to us. The outcome of the legal claim and proceeding against us cannot be predicted with certainty. We believe we have valid defenses to Vivint’s claims. Based on currently available information, we determined a loss is not probable or reasonably estimable at this time.
On February 9, 2016, we were sued along with one of our service providers in the Circuit Court for the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia by the estate of a deceased service provider customer alleging wrongful death, among other claims.  The suit seeks a total of $7 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages. We are currently reviewing this matter and have made no determination yet regarding the merits of the case.
From time to time, we may be a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business.
Other than the preceding matters, we are not a party to any lawsuit or proceeding that, in the opinion of management, is reasonably possible or probable of having a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We reserve for contingent liabilities based on ASC 450, “Contingencies,” when it is determined that a liability, inclusive of defense costs, is probable and reasonably estimable. Litigation is subject to many factors that are difficult to predict, so there can be no assurance that, in the event of a material unfavorable result in one or more claims, we will not incur material costs.