10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to

Commission File Number: 000-54348

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA	94-3461079
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
100 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301	(954) 525-6464
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the close of business on November 12, 2012 is as follows:

Class	Number of Shares
Common Stock: $0.001 Par Value	100,691,954

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements.
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – Thee and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit – Six months ended June 30, 2012	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows – Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	23
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	23
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	24
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	24
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	24
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	24
Item 5.	Other Information.	24
Item 6.	Exhibits.	25

rVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(unaudited)			(audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	53,565		$	19,917
Accounts receivable		64,580			105,203
Prepaid expenses		85,135			180,573
Other current assets		64,167			-
Total current assets		267,447			305,693
Property and equipment, net		28,455			46,829
Software development costs		94,984			244,498
Deposits		17,488			17,388
	$	408,374		$	614,408
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	166,589		$	202,142
Accrued expenses		479,872			456,339
Convertible notes		692,932			185,248
Derivative liability		483,700			100,900
Deferred revenue		31,975			31,975
Total current liabilities		1,855,068			976,604
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share; 140,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011; 38,370,512 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 37,383,725 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011		38,371			37,384
Additional paid-in capital		6,088,789			5,378,005
Accumulated deficit		(7,573,854	)		(5,777,585	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(1,446,694	)		(362,196	)
	$	408,374		$	614,408

1

rVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenue
rVue advertising revenue	$	11,510		$	-		$	27,829		$	124,443
Network		95,925			108,461			211,094			220,499
		107,435			108,461			238,923			344,942
Costs and expenses
Cost of revenue		15,051			45,218			71,260			149,487
Selling, general and administrative expenses		528,291			878,917			1,456,138			1,812,029
Depreciation and amortization		172,021			183,874			295,689			309,392
Interest income		(34	)		(905	)		(170	)		(3,262	)
Interest expense		351,344			-			647,827			-
Change in fair value of derivative		(896,719	)		-			(453,008	)		-
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		-			-			17,456			-
		169,954			1,107,104			2,035,192			2,267,646
Loss before provision for income taxes		(62,519	)		(998,643	)		(1,796,269	)		(1,922,704	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-
Net loss	$	(62,519	)	$	(998,643	)	$	(1,796,269	)	$	(1,922,704	)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725

2

rVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

(unaudited)

									Additional
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid-In			Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Total
Balance, December 31, 2011		-	$	-		37,383,725	$	37,384	$	5,378,005		$	(5,777,585	)	$	(362,196	)
Common stock issued for services and debt issuance costs		-		-		635,000		635	$	132,466			-			133,101
Common stock issued upon exercise of options		-		-		351,787		352		(352	)		-			-
Stock-based compensation expense						-		-		22,001			-			22,001
Elimination of derivative warrant		-		-		-		-		446,419			-			446,419
Issuance of warrants included in the convertible debt		-		-		-		-		110,250			-			110,250
Net loss		-		-		-		-		-			(1,796,269	)		(1,796,269	)
Balance, June 30, 2012		-	$	-		38,370,512	$	38,371	$	6,088,789		$	(7,573,854	)	$	(1,446,694	)

3

rVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Operating activities
Net loss	$	(1,796,269	)	$	(1,922,704	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash  used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		295,689			309,392
Stock-based compensation expense		22,001			263,123
Common stock issued for services		38,000			21,285
Convertible loan interest		647,705			-
Change in fair value of derivative instruments		(453,008	)		-
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		17,456			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		40,623			(2,626	)
Prepaid expenses		95,438			(35,946	)
Accounts payable		(35,553	)		41,561
Accrued expenses		23,533			164,012
Deferred revenue		-			-
Cash used in operating activities		(1,104,284	)		(1,161,903	)
Investing activities
Payments for property, equipment and software development		(96,968	)		(287,217	)
Repayments by (advances to) Argo Digital Solutions, Inc.		-			172,012
Change in deposits		(100	)		-
Cash used in investing activities		(97,068	)		(115,205	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from convertible notes		1,235,000			-
Cash provided by financing activities		1,235,000			-
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		33,648			(1,277,108	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		19,917			2,334,121
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	53,565		$	1,057,013

4

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

rVue Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Rivulet International, Inc. (“We”, “rVue” or the “Company”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 12, 2008. We are an advertising technology company that has developed and operates an integrated advertising exchange and digital distribution platform – rVue – for the Digital Out-of-Home (“DOOH”) industry.

Basis of Presentation and Preparation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to accounts receivable, fair values of financial instruments, useful lives of capitalized software developments costs and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.

The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2011 Form 10-K”).

The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Note 2 – Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have sustained losses and experienced negative cash flows from operations since inception, and have an accumulated deficit of $7,573,854 at June 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate in the normal course of business. We have funded our activities to date almost exclusively from equity and debt financings.

We will continue to require substantial funds to continue development of our core business. Management’s plans in order to help meet our operating cash flow requirements include (i) financing activities such as private placements of common stock, and issuances of debt and convertible debt instruments, (ii) staff reductions, (iii) a hiring and expansion freeze, and (iv) the establishment of strategic relationships which we believe will lead to the generation of additional revenue opportunities. Subsequent to June 30, 2012, we raised an additional $1,200,000 through the sale of common stock that also triggered the conversion of secured convertible promissory notes (the “New Notes”) that had been issued between January 27, 2012 and July 24, 2012, into 42,301,442 shares of Common Stock. See Note 12 “Subsequent Events” for further information.

While we believe that we will be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund our operations, there are no assurances that such additional funding will be achieved or that we will succeed in our future operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 - Loss Per Common Share

Basic and diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing the loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Since the Company incurred losses attributable to common stockholders during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, diluted loss per common share has not been computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Dilutive common shares include incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants to the extent that the average fair value of the Company’s common stock for each period is greater than the exercise price of the derivative securities, and shares issuable upon the conversion of notes.

5

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(62,519	)	$	(998,643	)	$	(1,796,269	)	$	(1,922,704	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725
Effect of dilutive securities (1)		-			-			-			-
Weighted-average diluted shares		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	0.00		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)

See note 12 regarding significant issuances of Common Stock subsequent to June 30, 2012.

(1) The following stock options, warrants and convertible notes outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per share because the net effect would have been anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Stock options		410,026		3,497,500		410,026		3,497,500
Warrants		754,968		9,674,995		754,968		9,674,995
Convertible Notes		7,784,135		-		7,784,135		-
		8,949,129		13,172,495		8,949,129		13,172,495

Note 4 – Financial Instruments

Cash and cash equivalents

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Cash	$	39,680	$	16,097
Cash equivalents - money market funds		13,885		3,820
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	53,565	$	19,917

Accounts Receivable

We sell our services directly to our customers. We generally do not require collateral from our customers; however, we will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk. Accounts receivable from two of our customers accounted for 63.4%, and 31.0% of total accounts receivable at June 30, 2012, and 72.8% and 19.0% from two of our customers at December 31, 2011. We had no allowance for doubtful accounts at either June 30, 2012 or at December 31, 2011.

6

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable directly or indirectly.

Level 3 - Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable.

We are responsible for the valuation process and as part of this process we used data from an outside source to establish fair value. We performed due diligence to understand the inputs used or how the data was calculated or derived, and we corroborated the reasonableness of external inputs in the valuation process.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
June 30, 2012
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$	13,885	$	-	$	-	$	13,885
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	483,700	$	483,700
December 31, 2011
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$	3,820	$	-	$	-	$	3,820
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	100,900	$	100,900

The fair value of the money market funds, classified as Level 1, utilized quoted prices in active markets. The fair value of derivative liabilities, classified as Level 3, utilized a simulation analysis using a binomial lattice model and other unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes the valuation techniques, the inputs and the ranges used to determine the fair value of our Level 3 embedded derivatives and Series C warrants at June 30, 2012:

Liability	Measurement Date	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (low)		Range (high)	Average			Note
Embedded derivative in New Notes Issued	5/10/12	$	690,600	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(1,790	)	603		67			(1	)
1/27/12					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Series C Warrants Issued 1/27/12	5/10/2012	$	0.146	Binomial lattice model simulation	Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Embedded derivative in New Notes Issued	5/11/2012	$	167,400	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(1,716	)	600		65			(1	)
5/11/12					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Series C Warrants Issued 5/11/12	5/11/2012	$	0.147	Binomial lattice model simulation	Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Embedded derivative in New Notes	6/30/2012	$	483,700	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(2,436	)	666		20			(1	)
					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%

7

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Notes:

(1) Based on the minimum extreme distribution applied in the analyses, certain iterations of the simulation imply a Subsequent Offering prior to the valuation date. When this occurs, the model assumes that no Subsequent Offering took place. This ensures that there is less than a 100% probability of a Subsequent Offering taking place, which we believe is reasonable.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our embedded derivative instrument and the Series C Warrants include the expected size and timing of a Subsequent Offering, as well as the assumed forward volatility. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in lower or higher fair value measurement. In general the fair value of the embedded derivatives are (i) inversely related to the size of a Subsequent Offering, (ii) are positively related to the expected timing of a Subsequent Offering and (iii) are positively related to the assumed forward volatility.

Rollforward of Level 3 Liabilities

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the three- month period ended June 30, 2012:

Balance, April 1, 2012	$	1,659,438
Issuances		167,400
Settlements		(446,419	)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings		(896,719	)
Transfers into or out of level 3		-
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	483,700

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the six- month period ended June 30, 2012:

Balance, January 1, 2012	$	100,900
Issuances		1,282,227
Settlements		(523,119	)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings		(376,308	)
Transfers into or out of level 3		-
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	483,700

Note 6 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details

The following tables show the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statement details as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Prepaid expenses	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Consulting fees	$	-	$	16,200
Insurance		22,344		16,109
Investor relations fees		5,000		10,000
Licenses and subscriptions		37,457		20,958
Other		890		1,612
Rent		15,039		15,252
Services		4,405		5,233
Unamortized investment banking fee warrants		-		95,209
	$	85,135	$	180,573

8

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

In addition, the Company recorded Other current assets of $64,167 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, consisting of debt issuance costs of $95,000, reduced by amortization of those costs totaling $30,833.

Property and Equipment	Estimated Useful Lives	June 30,			December 31,
	(Years)	2012			2011
Computers and software	2 - 5	$	90,259		$	89,757
Furniture and equipment	3		22,574			22,574
Gross property and equipment			112,833			112,331
Less accumulated depreciation			(84,378	)		(65,502	)
Net property and equipment		$	28,455		$	46,829

Depreciation expense was $18,874 and $23,179 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Software Development Costs	Estimated Useful Lives	June 30,			December 31,
	(Months)	2012			2011
Software development costs	18	$	1,026,929		$	930,461
Less accumulated amortization			(931,945	)		(685,963	)
Net software development costs		$	94,984		$	244,498

Amortization expense was $245,982 and $286,212 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Accrued Expenses	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Investor relations fees	$	158,300	$	150,000
Personnel costs		100,681		131,703
Directors fees		101,666		57,000
Professional fees		44,608		44,494
Deferred rent		15,242		26,642
Network costs		37,691		29,323
Other		21,684		17,177
	$	479,872	$	456,339

Note 7 – Convertible Notes

In November and December 2011 we entered into certain Promissory Note Purchase Agreements (“PNPAs”) in the aggregate principal amount of $285,000 with certain investors, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the “PNPA Investors”). We issued $285,000 of Secured Convertible Secured Promissory Notes (the “Notes”). The Notes are secured by all of our assets and bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on November 30, 2012. In the event we enter into a strategic investment prior to November 30, 2012, the holder may, at their option, convert the unpaid principal and interest into shares of our common stock at 75% of the price paid by the strategic investor. At maturity, at the option of the holder, unpaid principal and interest may be converted into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $.25.

We determined that the embedded conversion feature in the Notes is a derivative as defined in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, (“ASC 815”). The key factors in this analysis included: (i) determining that the conversion feature met the definition of a derivative, and (ii) that a scope exception was not applicable to the Company, as the conversion feature was not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock, due to the various potential adjustments to the conversion price.

Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value and are then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. At November 30, 2011 we valued the derivative instrument at $101,600 and at December 31, 2011 we valued the derivative instrument at $100,900, recognizing a $700 change in fair value.

9

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The initial fair value of the derivative was recorded as a reduction of the Notes. This original issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes. At December 31, 2011, the Notes were carried at $185,248, which is net of unamortized original issue discount of $101,600. On January 27, 2012 the Notes, which with accrued interest, had an outstanding balance of $288,067, were exchanged, as discussed below. The Notes were carried at $193,911, net of unamortized original issue discount of $76,700, resulting in a loss on early extinguishment of the Notes of $17,456, and a gain of $24,200 on the change in the fair value of derivatives.

On January 27, 2012, we entered into Secured Promissory Note Purchase Agreements (“New Agreements”) with investors (“New Investors”) for the purchase of promissory notes (“New Notes”) with an aggregate principal amount of $935,000. The PNPA Investors agreed to convert their Notes, totaling $288,067, into New Notes. We issued to the New Investors and the PNPA Investors New Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1,223,067 and warrants to purchase 3,057,666 shares of our common stock at $.20 per share, exercisable for a period of five years (the “Series C Warrants”). The New Notes are secured by all of our assets and bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on January 31, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”). If, prior to maturity, we consummate a financing or related financing of equity securities with aggregate gross proceeds of a least $500,000 (collectively, a “Subsequent Offering”) then all of the unpaid principal amount of the New Notes and any accrued but unpaid interest thereon shall automatically be deemed converted into fully paid and non-assessable securities of the Company sold in the Subsequent Offering (the “Subsequent Offering Securities”) on the same terms and conditions as the other investors in the Subsequent Offering; provided, however, that the number of Subsequent Offering Securities to be issued to the holders of the New Notes upon such conversion shall be equal to the quotient, rounded to the nearest whole number, obtained by dividing (x) the unpaid principal amount of the New Note plus any accrued but unpaid interest thereon by the lower of (y) 70% of the price per security issued in the Subsequent Offering or (z) $.20 (the “Conversion Price”). If no Subsequent Offering is closed by the Company by the Maturity Date, then all of the unpaid principal and interest due under the New Notes will be due and payable, and may, at the option of the holder, be converted into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.20. In the event that we fail to raise $1.5 million in common equity by July 24, 2012, the Conversion Price shall be reduced from $.20 to $.10 and the exercise price of the Series C Warrants shall be reduced to $.10 (“Ratchet Provision”).

On May 10, 2012, we amended the New Agreement to: (i) increase the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Notes issuable under the New Agreement to $1,775,000 from $1,275,000, (ii) remove the ratchet provision in the New Agreement and all references thereto in the Notes and Warrants, and (iii) change the collateral agent with respect thereto.

On May 11, 2012, we issued additional New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 and Series C Warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share, exercisable for a period of five years to an entity that is wholly owned by a stockholder and director of ours. We received net proceeds of $300,000 from the sale of these additional New Notes.

We determined that the embedded conversion feature in the New Notes and the Series C Warrants are derivatives as defined in ASC 815. At January 27, 2012 we valued the embedded derivative conversion feature of the New Notes at $705,100 and the Series C Warrants at $.134 per warrant. The initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature and warrants was recorded as a reduction of the New Notes. This original issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes. We valued the embedded derivative conversion feature of the New Notes issued on May 11, 2012 at $167,000 and the Series C Warrants at $0.147 per warrant. The initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature and warrants was recorded as a reduction of the New Notes. This original issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes. The warrants issued with the New Notes on May 11, 2012 did not meet the definition of a derivative, and were recorded as additional paid-in capital. At June 30, 2012, the New Notes are carried at $692,932, which includes accrued interest of $33,761 and which is net of unamortized original issue discount of $863,896. Because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs, management has determined it is not practical to estimate the fair value of the New Notes.

Pursuant to the amended New Agreement discussed above, the ratchet provision contained in the original agreements has been removed.  Since the Series C Warrants no longer had derivative features as a result of the modification, the amount of derivative warrant liabilities associated with the shares have been reclassified from derivative warrant liabilities to additional paid-in capital. The amount reclassified due to this modification was $446,419. As discussed above, the embedded derivative conversion feature contains other adjustment provisions in addition to the Ratchet Provision, and the removal of the Ratchet Provision did not change the classification of the embedded derivative conversion feature as a derivative liability.

10

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

At June 30, 2012 we valued the embedded derivative conversion feature of the New Notes at $483,700. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, fair value of the embedded derivative conversion feature and the Series C Warrants decreased by $896,719 and increased by $453,008, respectively.

Note 8 - Income Taxes

There is no income tax benefit for the losses for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, since management has determined that the realization of the net deferred tax asset is not more likely than not to be realized and has created a valuation allowance for the entire amount of such benefit.

Our policy is to record interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits as additional income taxes in the statement of operations. At December 31, 2011, we had no unrecognized tax benefits, or any tax related interest or penalties. There were no changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the period ended June 30, 2012. We did not recognize any interest or penalties during 2011 related to unrecognized tax benefits, or through the period ended June 30, 2012.

Note 9 - Stockholders’ Equity and Stock Based Compensation

Equity Awards

Stock Option Activity

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance at December 31, 2011		3,722,500		$	0.23
Options granted		-		$	-
Options exercised		(1,356,880	)	$	0.20
Options forfeited		(3,120	)	$	0.20
Balance at June 30, 2012		2,362,500		$	0.24		8.23	$	-
Exercisable at June 30, 2012		2,250,834		$	0.24		8.20	$	-
Expected to vest after June 30, 2012		111,666		$	0.30		9.05	$	-

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period in excess of the weighted-average exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable. The aggregate intrinsic value excludes the effect of stock options that have a zero or negative intrinsic value.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost for stock options is estimated at the grant date based on the fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life and interest rates. The Company’s computation of expected life is determined based on the simplified method as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded. The interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on comparable companies’ average historical volatility. The Company does not expect to pay dividends. While the Company believes these estimates are reasonable, the estimated compensation expense would increase if the expected life was increased or a higher expected volatility was used. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

We did not grant any options during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

11

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

The following table provides a summary of the stock-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of revenue	$	296	$	671	$	889	$	1,212
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6,085		101,580		21,112		261,911
	$	6,381	$	102,251	$	22,001	$	263,123

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

Other Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

We lease our Ft. Lauderdale office space under a non-cancelable operating lease. The lease is for a period of three years beginning July 1, 2010, and provides for one renewal option of three years. Effective October 1, 2011, we entered into a one-year lease agreement for an office in an executive office complex in New York City. As of June 30, 2012, our total future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable operating leases was $76,088. Rent expense was $45,816 and $38,044 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We do not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Contingencies

We are subject to certain legal proceedings that have not been adjudicated, which are discussed in Part II, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q under the heading “Legal Proceedings”. In the opinion of management, the Company does not have probable liability related to these legal proceedings that would materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we fail to prevail in any of these legal matters, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.

Note 11 - Related Party Transactions and Certain Other Transactions

In September 2009 we and Argo Digital Solutions, Inc. (“Argo”), the company from whom we acquired substantially all our assets in May 2010, entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the “TSA”). Argo agreed to provide certain general and administrative services, including labor, technology, facilities and other services to us on an as needed basis in exchange for cash consideration. The TSA was terminated on May 13, 2010 and, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement between us and Argo as of May 13, 2010, any and all advances and payments made by us to or on behalf of Argo and owing by Argo to us were to be repaid by Argo on or prior to May 13, 2011, with interest at ten (10%) percent per annum. At December 31, 2010, we had advanced a net of $172,012 to Argo, including accrued interest of $9,753. On January 17, 2011, Argo repaid the balance then outstanding in full.

We paid a consulting fee of $10,000 to one of our directors during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, and reimbursed the director $9,920 for out-of pocket expenses incurred in connection with our business during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

In March 2011, we entered into a Consulting/Services Agreement to facilitate the marketing and promotion of direct TV advertised products with Acorn Composite Corporation (“Acorn”), an entity that is wholly owned by Robert Roche, a stockholder and director of ours who beneficially owns 40.2% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock as of November 1, 2012. We did not record any significant revenue under this contract in either of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

In January 2012, in connection with the sale of the New Notes, we agreed to reimburse an investor (the “Lead Investor”) $65,000 for costs and expenses incurred by it (including, without limitation, legal and administrative fees) payable in cash or shares of our Common Stock at our election. On February 8, 2012, we issued 325,000 shares of our Common Stock to the Lead Investor as payment. Robert Roche, who is the sole stockholder of Acorn, is the grantor of the trust that controls the majority member of the Lead Investor. His sister is the manager of both the Lead Investor and the majority member of the Lead Investor. As of November 8, 2012, the Lead Investor beneficially owns 17.6% of our outstanding Common Stock. Mr. Roche disclaims any beneficial ownership of securities held by the Lead Investor as he does not have voting or dispositive powers over such securities. In addition another one of our directors is a minority member of the Lead Investor.

In May 2012, the Company and the Lead Investor agreed to amend the agreement with the investors in the New Notes to: (i) issue up to an additional $500,000 of Notes, (ii) remove the ratchet language providing for an adjustment to the conversion price of the Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants in the event $1.5 million in common equity was not raised by the Company within 180 days of the original sale of the Notes, and (iii) change the collateral agent from David A. Loppert to Theresa M. Roche.

12

RVUE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

On May 11, 2012, the Company issued additional New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 (out of the additional $500,000 that was just authorized) and Series C Warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of our common stock (the “Warrant Stock”), at $.20 per share (the “Warrant Price”) exercisable for a period of five years to Acorn. We received net proceeds of $300,000 from the sale of these additional New Notes.

The Warrant Stock may be redeemed prior to the expiration date of the Warrants, at the option of the Company, at a price of $.001 per share (the “Redemption Price”) upon 10 days written notice to the Holder; provided that (i) our shares of common stock have had a closing sales price greater than $1.00 per share for twenty (20) consecutive trading days and (ii) at the date of the redemption notice and during the entire redemption period there is an effective registration statement covering the resale of the Warrant Stock. The Warrant may be exercised by the Holder, for cash, at any time after notice of redemption has been given by the Company and prior to the time and date fixed for redemption. On and after the redemption date, the Holder shall have no further rights except to receive, upon surrender of the Warrant, the Redemption Price of the applicable Warrant Stock.

Note 12 – Subsequent Events

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date of filing.

On September 10, 2012, we sold 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Acorn, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $1,200,000 (the “Equity Financing”).  The shares of Common Stock were issued to Acorn without registration in reliance upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction by the Company not involving any public offering.

Previously, between January 27, 2012 and July 24, 2012, the Company had issued New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,723,067.  Pursuant to Section 3.1 of the New Notes, upon the Company selling shares of Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of at least $500,000 (“Subsequent Offering”), then all of the unpaid principal amount of the New Notes and any accrued and unpaid interest thereon will automatically (without any further action required by the holders of the New Notes) be deemed converted into shares of Common Stock at a 30% discount to the price in the Subsequent Offering (the “Note Conversions”).

Since the Equity Financing qualifies as a Subsequent Offering, the principal of and accrued interest on the New Notes, aggregating $1,776,667, automatically converted into an aggregate of 42,301,442 shares of Common Stock upon consummation of the Equity Financing.  Immediately following the consummation of the Equity Financing and the Note Conversions, the Company had 100,691,954 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

As of November 12, 2012, Robert Roche, a member of our Board of Directors, is deemed to beneficially own 42,654,878 shares of Common Stock, or 40.2%, consisting of: (i) 200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days, (ii) 36,821,545 shares that are owned by Acorn (of which Mr. Roche is the sole owner and therefore may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over such securities) and (iii) 5,833,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants that are exercisable within 60 days that are owned by Acorn.

Following the conversion of the Notes, the first priority security interest on all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ assets that was held by the holders of the Notes was terminated.

Note 13 – Supplemental Non-Cash Information

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company modified the warrants resulting in a reclassification of the derivative warrant liability to equity totaling $446,419. Additionally during the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company paid debt issuance costs of $95,000 by issuing 475,000 shares of its stock. There were no non-cash transactions noted for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

13

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This section and other parts of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those Risk Factors discussed in Part II, Item 7, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the 2011 Form 10-K and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The Company assumes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

Available Information

The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) are filed with the SEC. Such reports and other information filed by the Company with the SEC are available on the Company’s website at www.rvue.com when such reports are available on the SEC website. The public may read and copy any materials filed by the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy, and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The contents of these websites are not incorporated into this filing. Further, the Company’s references to the URLs for these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Executive Overview

We are an advertising technology company and operate rVue, a demand-side platform (“DSP”) for planning, buying and managing Digital Place-Based Networks and Digital Billboards and Signage (collectively “Digital Out-of-Home” or “DOOH”) advertising. We provide media services, including an online, internet based DSP that connects advertisers and/or advertising agencies with third party DOOH media or networks, that allows the advertiser to create a targeted advertising campaign and media plan, and negotiate that media plan simultaneously with all the third-party networks selected. Through our strategic media services group, we execute campaigns on behalf of advertising clients or their agencies. We earn transaction fees for processing these transactions.

As of November 12, 2012, 182 networks comprising approximately 93,684 locations and 752,167 screens representing the top 50 DMAs were accessible through rVue, delivering approximately 252 million daily impressions. Through our strategic media services group, we execute complete campaigns on behalf of advertising clients or their agencies.

We also provide network services and receive fees, either under contract or on a monthly basis, from three clients for which we receive monthly fixed fees of $31,975 plus additional amounts for special projects. We expect to continue to receive revenue from these three clients during the next twelve months, but we do not intend to pursue additional network related service opportunities as the focus of our business is to earn advertising revenue and transaction fees from rVue as discussed above.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP and the Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and operating results require the Company’s management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in its condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of this Form 10-Q and in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2011 Form 10-K describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences may be material.

14

Management believes the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates are those related to software development costs, derivative instruments, revenue recognition, stock-based compensation and income taxes. Management considers these policies critical because they are both important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and operating results, and they require management to make judgments and estimates about inherently uncertain matters. The Company’s senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

15

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

Our unaudited results of operations for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Revenue
rVue fees	$	11,510		$	-
Network		95,925			108,461
		107,435			108,461
Costs and expenses
Cost of revenue		15,051			45,218
Selling, general and administrative expenses		528,291			878,917
Depreciation and amortization		172,021			183,874
Interest income		(34	)		(905	)
Interest expense		351,344			-
Change in fair value of derivative		(896,719	)		-
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		-			-
		169,954			1,107,104
Loss before provision for income taxes		(62,519	)		(998,643	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Net loss	$	(62,519	)	$	(998,643	)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	-		$	(0.03	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		38,171,099			37,273,725

Revenue

Revenue was $107,435 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $108,461 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $1,026 decline, or 0.9%. We earned revenue as follows:

	Three Months ended June 30,
Revenue Category	2012		2011		$ Change			% Change
rVue fees	$	11,510	$	-	$	11,510			N.M.
Network		95,925		108,461		(12,536	)		-11.6	%
Total Revenue	$	107,435	$	108,461	$	(1,026	)		-0.9	%

rVue fees

rVue fees were $11,510 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, a $11,510 improvement over the $0 rVue fees for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011. While the majority of our revenue historically has been from network services and license fees, the development of the rVue platform and generating revenue and fees is the focus of our business. As the rVue platform gains traction with advertisers and agencies, we expect to generate additional revenue and fees in 2012 from advertisers and agencies for placing advertising with DOOH networks through rVue. This is the focus of our business and the area in which we expect to generate the majority of our revenue in 2012 and beyond. We cannot assure you that advertisers or agencies will accept the rVue platform as their platform of choice for placing advertising with DOOH networks.

Network

Network revenue was $95,925 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, a $12,536, or 11.6%, decrease compared to the $108,461 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011. We earned fixed monthly fees of $31,975 from two clients and fees from special projects from one client. We expect to continue to receive revenue from these services to these clients for the next twelve months, but we do not intend to pursue additional network-related service opportunities as the focus of our business is the rVue platform.

16

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists primarily of expenses for the purchase of advertising impressions from third-party networks, the cost to deliver network services and the cost of producing content for our network clients.

Cost of revenue was $15,051 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $45,218 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $30,167 decline, or 66.7%, and was comprised of:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011		$ Change			% Change
Compensation and benefits	$	4,408	$	33,662	$	(29,254	)		-86.9	%
Stock-based compensation expense		296		671		(375	)		-55.9	%
Network services		2,672		3,511		(839	)		-23.9	%
rVue operations		7,675		7,374		301			4.1	%
Total	$	15,051	$	45,218	$	(30,167	)		-66.7	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $528,291 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $878,917 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $350,626 decrease, or 39.9%. Changes by major component of SG&A are:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012			2011		$ Change			% Change
Compensation and benefits	$	338,713		$	331,629	$	7,084			2.1	%
Stock-based compensation expense		6,085			101,580		(95,495	)		-94.0	%
Facility expense		40,120			41,250		(1,130	)		-2.7	%
Communications expense		23,348			13,866		9,483			68.4	%
Debt issuance costs		(65,000	)		-		(65,000	)		N.M.
Travel expense		19,831			16,263		3,568			21.9	%
Advertising and marketing expense		14,212			30,210		(15,998	)		-53.0	%
Investor relations and investment banking fees		23,281			92,286		(69,005	)		-74.8	%
Professional and consulting fees		100,591			93,105		7,486			8.0	%
Managed services		-			122,673		(122,673	)		-100.0	%
Office support and supply expense		27,110			36,055		(8,945	)		-24.8	%
Total	$	528,291		$	878,917	$	(350,626	)		-39.9	%

Compensation and benefits increased $7,084, or 2.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. This change was due to an $83,379 reduction in the amount of payroll costs being capitalized for software development, a reduction in payroll of $10,354 due to staff reductions that were implemented in the three months ended June 30, 2012, a reduction in relocation costs of $13,500 as there were no relocation costs incurred, an elimination in the Company’s usage of temporary labor, reducing expenses by $9,173, a $90,579 reduction in the vacation accrual for recent staff reductions and a reduction of unemployment tax expense of $5,221 that was realized due to receiving a credit from the Company’s insurer when the Company contested the rate it was being charged.

Stock-based compensation expense varies depending on the term over which the options vest. Options that were granted in 2010 and 2011 have now vested and are fully expensed, resulting in a lower expense in the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to the expense for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Debt issuance costs were for costs and expenses paid to the lead investor in connection with the January 2012 issuance of secured convertible promissory notes as more fully discussed in Note 11 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The debt issuance costs totaled $95,000 and are being amortized over the life of the underlying debt. We recognized $30,833 of this cost in the three-month period ended June 30, 2012.

Advertising and marketing expense decreased by $15,998, or 53.0%, in the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, when compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2011.

17

Investor relations and investment banking fees for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 decreased $69,005, or 74.8%, when compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2011. The Company ended its agreement with its investor relations representative to reduce its operating costs.

Professional and consulting fees for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 were up $7,486, or 8.0%, compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2011. Legal fees were up approximately $11,000, fees related to SEC filings and Sarbanes-Oxley work were up approximately $3,800, and accounting and other fees were down by approximately $4,200.

Managed services were eliminated in the second half of 2011 resulting in no comparable expense in the three-month period ending June 30, 2012. These services are now provided by our employees.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $172,021 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $183,874 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $11,853 decline, or 6.4%. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, depreciation and amortization expense for software development was $141,188, while amortization of loan costs was $30,833. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, depreciation and amortization expense was mainly for software development.

Interest income

Interest income was $34 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $905 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $871 decline, or 96.2%. Interest income is a function of cash on hand.

Interest expense

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011
Interest on convertible notes	$	20,754	$	-
Original issue discount		330,590		-
	$	351,344	$	-

We issued Notes in November 2011 and New Notes in January and May 2012. The interest on these notes accrues at 6% per annum and totaled $20,754 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. The original issue discount represents the amortization of the initial value of the embedded derivative components of the Notes and New Notes, as more fully discussed in Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

The decrease in the fair value of the derivative liability and the Series C Warrants at June 30, 2012 resulted in us recognizing an unrealized gain during the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 of $896,719.

18

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

Our unaudited results of operations for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Revenue
rVue fees	$	27,829		$	124,443
Network		211,094			220,499
		238,923			344,942
Costs and expenses
Cost of revenue		71,260			149,487
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1,456,138			1,812,029
Depreciation and amortization		295,689			309,392
Interest income		(170	)		(3,262	)
Interest expense		647,827			-
Change in fair value of derivative		(453,008	)		-
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		17,456			-
		2,035,192			2,267,646
Loss before provision for income taxes		(1,796,269	)		(1,922,704	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Net loss	$	(1,796,269	)	$	(1,922,704	)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share:
Basic and diluted		37,917,448			37,273,725

Revenue

Revenue was $238,923 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $344,942 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $106,019 decline, or 30.7%. We earned revenue as follows:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
Revenue Category	2012		2011		$ Change			% Change
rVue fees	$	27,829	$	124,443	$	(96,614	)		-77.6	%
Network		211,094		220,499		(9,405	)		-4.3	%
Total Revenue	$	238,923	$	344,942	$	(106,019	)		-30.7	%

rVue fees

rVue fees were $27,829 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $96,614, or 77.6%, when compared to the $124,443 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. While the majority of our revenue historically has been from network services and license fees, the development of the rVue platform and generating revenue and fees is the focus of our business. As the rVue platform gains traction with advertisers and agencies, we expect to generate additional revenue and fees in 2012 from advertisers and agencies for placing advertising with DOOH networks through rVue. This is the focus of our business and the area in which we expect to generate the majority of our revenue in 2012 and beyond. We cannot assure you that advertisers or agencies will accept the rVue platform as their platform of choice for placing advertising with DOOH networks.

Network

Network revenue was $211,094 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $9,405, or 4.3%, when compared to network revenue of $220,499 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. We earned fixed monthly fees of $31,975 from two clients and fees from special projects from one client. We expect to continue to receive revenue from these services to these clients for the next twelve months, but we do not intend to pursue additional network-related service opportunities as the focus of our business is the rVue platform.

19

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists primarily of expenses for the purchase of advertising impressions from third-party networks, the cost to deliver network services and the cost of producing content for our network clients. Compensation and benefits included $4,200 of severance paid in March 2012.

Cost of revenue was $71,260 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $149,487 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $78,227, or 52.3%. This cost was comprised of:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011		$ Change			% Change
Compensation and benefits	$	45,558	$	69,092	$	(23,534	)		(34.1	)%
Stock-based compensation expense		889		1,212		(323	)		(26.7	)%
Network services		6,552		5,217		1,335			25.6	%
rVue operations		18,261		73,966		(55,705	)		-75.3	%
Total	$	71,260	$	149,487	$	(78,227	)		-52.3	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $1,456,138 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $1,812,029 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, a $355,891 decrease, or 19.6%. Changes by major component of SG&A are:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011		$ Change			% Change
Compensation and benefits	$	814,972	$	638,699	$	176,273			27.6	%
Stock-based compensation expense		21,112		261,911		(240,799	)		-91.9	%
Facility expense		86,962		82,672		4,290			5.2	%
Communications expense		43,096		34,019		9,077			26.7	%
Travel expense		37,945		35,146		2,799			8.0	%
Advertising and marketing expense		27,320		122,373		(95,053	)		-77.7	%
Investor relations and investment banking fees		130,909		180,846		(49,937	)		-27.6	%
Professional and consulting fees		236,832		202,296		34,536			17.1	%
Managed services		-		200,356		(200,356	)		-100.0	%
Office support and supply expense		56,990		53,711		3,280			6.1	%
Total	$	1,456,138	$	1,812,029	$	(355,891	)		-19.6	%

Compensation and benefits increased $176,273, or 27.6%. Payroll increased $69,629 and included $17,840 of severance and $38,000 of deferred compensation paid during the six months ended June 30, 2012. In the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had hired outside professionals to run our managed services group and we paid them $193,668. Those services are now provided by our employees. Payroll taxes and costs increased $10,673 and insurance increased by $26,482, all as a result of increased rates and costs. The vacation accrual decreased $90,759 due to staff reductions.

Stock-based compensation expense varies depending on the term over which the options vest. Options that were granted in 2010 and 2011 have now vested and are fully expensed, resulting in a lower expense in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 when compared to the expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Debt issuance costs were for costs and expenses paid to the lead investor in connection with the January 2012 issuance of secured convertible promissory notes as more fully discussed in Note 11 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The debt issuance costs totaled $95,000 and are being amortized over the life of the underlying debt. We recognized $30,833 of this cost in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The debt issuance costs, which were previously recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense, are now recorded as an other current asset, net of amortization.

Advertising and marketing expense declined by $95,053, or 77.7%, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. The six-month period ended June 30, 2011 included $80,000 for a one-time momentum advertising program.

Investor relations and investment banking fees for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 decreased $49,937, or 27.6%, when compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. This reduction is primarily due to the Company’s termination of its agreement with its investor relations representative to reduce its operating costs.

20

Professional and consulting fees for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 increased $34,536, or 17.1%, compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. Legal fees increased approximately $30,000, fees related to SEC filings and Sarbanes-Oxley work were up approximately $19,000, and accounting and other fees were essentially unchanged.

Managed services were eliminated in the second half of 2011 resulting in no comparable expense in the six-month period ending June 30, 2012. These services are now provided by our employees.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization was $295,689 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $309,392 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $13,703, or 4.4%. Except for $30,833 of loan cost amortization in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, depreciation and amortization expense is mainly for software development.

Interest income

Interest income was $170 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $3,262 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $3,092, or 94.8%. Interest income is a function of cash on hand.

Interest expense

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012		2011
Interest on convertible notes	$	35,101	$	-
Original issue discount		612,726		-
	$	647,827	$	-

We issued Notes in November 2011 and New Notes in January 2012 and May 2012. The interest on these notes accrues at 6% per annum and totaled $35,101 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The original issue discount represents the amortization of the initial value of the embedded derivative components of the Notes and New Notes, as more fully discussed in Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

The increase in the fair value of the derivative liability and the Series C Warrants at June 30, 2012 resulted in us recognizing an unrealized gain during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 of $453,008. This included a reduction in the fair value of our derivative instruments at January 27, 2012, which resulted in us recognizing a gain of $24,200 and a $76,700 gain on the settlement of the derivative liability related to the debt retirement.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

Holders of the Notes exchanged those Notes for New Notes in January 2012, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $17,456 in January 2012.

Except as discussed above, our results of operations for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 did not contain any unusual gains or losses from transactions not in our ordinary course of business.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business is still in the early stages, having commenced operations on September 15, 2009. As of June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $53,565. Since our inception, we have incurred net losses, and at June 30, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of $7,573,854 and total stockholders’ deficit of $1,446,694. We expect to continue to incur losses in fiscal 2012. There is no guarantee that we will ultimately be able to generate sufficient revenue or reduce our costs in the anticipated time frame to achieve and maintain profitability and have sustainable cash flows.

We did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures at June 30, 2012. We have budgeted capital expenditures of approximately $200,000 for the remainder of fiscal 2012, primarily capitalized labor for software development. Any required expenditure will be completed through internally generated funding or from proceeds from the sale of common or preferred stock, or borrowings.

We did not have any significant elements of income or loss not arising from continuing operations in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. While our business is marginally seasonal, we do not expect this seasonality to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows.

21

Cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities totaled $1,104,284 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $1,161,903 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, cash was used to fund a net loss of $1,796,269, reduced by non cash depreciation of $295,689, stock-based compensation expense of $22,001, common stock issued for services valued at $38,000, convertible loan interest of $647,705, a net gain in the fair value of derivative liabilities of $453,008, loss on early extinguishment of debt of $17,456, and changes in operating assets and liabilities totaling $124,041.

In the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, cash was used to fund a net loss of $1,922,704, reduced by non cash depreciation of $309,392, stock-based compensation expense of $263,123, common stock issued for services valued at $21,285, and changes in operating assets and liabilities totaling $21,874.

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $97,068 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to $115,205 of net cash used by investing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, cash used in investing activities consisted of $96,968 for software development costs and $100 for deposits. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, cash used in investing activities consisted of $287,217 for software development costs, reduced by $172,012 repaid by Argo.

Cash from financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $1,235,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 and were the proceeds from the sale of the New Notes. We had no financing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Financial condition

As of June 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit of $1,587,621, an accumulated deficit of $7,573,854 and total stockholders’ deficit of $1,446,694, compared to a working capital deficit of $670,911, an accumulated deficit of $5,777,585 and total stockholders’ deficit of $362,196 at December 31, 2011. The decrease in our financial condition was due to an increase in our net loss, the use of cash on hand, the amortization of the original issue discount associated with the Notes and New Notes, and the change in the fair value of our derivative instruments.

We believe that with the cash we have on hand and the cash we expect to raise through future securities issuances, that we will have sufficient funds available to cover our cash requirements through the next twelve months. We further expect that key strategic relationships that we have entered into and that we expect to enter into will lead to additional revenue opportunities.

At December 31, 2011 our registered independent public accounting firm expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern because, since inception, we have incurred substantial losses and negative cash flows from operations. Management’s plans to address these concerns include (i) having raised $935,000 and $300,000 through the sale of convertible notes in January 2012 and May 2012, respectively, (ii) having raised $1,200,000 through the issuance of Common Stock in September 2012, (iii) staff reductions in March 2012 which will result in an approximately $430,000 of annual savings, (iv) a hiring and expansion freeze, including the abandonment of plans to open new offices, until we generate sufficient revenue to warrant a change, and (v) entering into additional strategic relationships which are expected to lead to additional revenue opportunities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since our inception, except for standard operating leases, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.

22

Item 3.     Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4.     Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act were not effective as of June 30, 2012, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In response to the identified material weaknesses, the Company is working on improving its control activities. Management believes that actions recently taken, along with other improvements not yet implemented, will address the material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Company management plans to continue to review and make changes to overall design of its control environment, including the roles and responsibilities within the organization and reporting structure, as well as policies and procedures to improve the overall internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, which were identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

23

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.        Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business.

On or about March 8, 2011, Viewpoint Securities, Inc. commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the 17^th Judicial District in Broward County, Florida, alleging that we owe them a placement agent fee of $210,000 and warrants to purchase 175,167 shares of our common stock for purported services rendered in connection with our December 2010 private placement. On July 29, 2011, we answered their Second Amended Complaint and asserted various defenses to the claims asserted therein. Additionally, we filed a Counterclaim for rescission of the Agreement. On January 9, 2012, Viewpoint filed an amended answer to our counterclaim. We believe the case is without merit and are vigorously defending ourselves in connection therewith. In the opinion of management, we do not believe that we have a probable liability related to this legal proceeding that would materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we fail to prevail in this legal matter, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected. 


On or about February 22, 2012, Brooke Capital Investments LLC commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the 17^th Judicial District in Broward County, Florida, alleging that we owe them 750,000 shares of our common stock for services rendered in connection with an amended Investor Relations Consulting Agreement that we entered into with Brooke. On April 10, 2012, we answered their Complaint and asserted various defenses to the claims asserted therein. Additionally, we filed a Counterclaim for rescission of the Agreement. We believe the case is without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in connection therewith. In the opinion of management, we do not believe that we have a probable liability related to this legal proceeding that would materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we fail to prevail in this legal matter, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be adversely affected.

On or about September 14, 2012, Casville Investments, Ltd, MBC Investment, SA, and Watkins International, LTD., individually and derivatively on behalf of Argo Digital Solutions, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging various claims against the Company, certain of its former employees, and Argo Digital Solutions, Inc. (“Argo”).  Plaintiffs allege misconduct related to the alleged sale of Argo’s stock and assets.  We believe the case is without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in connection therewith. In the opinion of management, we do not believe that we have a probable liability related to this legal proceeding that would materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we fail to prevail in this legal matter, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be adversely affected.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors.

Not applicable.

Item 2.        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3.        Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5.        Other Information.

None.

24

Item 6.        Exhibits.

(a) Index to Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1**	Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
EX-101.INS *	XBRL Instance Document
EX-101.SCH *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
EX-101.CAL *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
EX-101.DEF *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
EX-101.LAB *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
EX-101.PRE *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

25

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	rVue Holdings, Inc. (Registrant)
Date: November 19, 2012	By:	/s/ Michael F. Mullarkey
		Acting Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

26

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
31.1*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2*	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1**	Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
EX-101.INS *	XBRL Instance Document
EX-101.SCH *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
EX-101.CAL *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
EX-101.DEF *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
EX-101.LAB *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
EX-101.PRE *	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

27

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael F. Mullarkey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of rVue Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 19, 2012	/s/ Michael F. Mullarkey
	Michael F. Mullarkey
	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael F. Mullarkey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of rVue Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 19, 2012	/s/ Michael F. Mullarkey
	Michael F. Mullarkey
	Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of rVue Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Mullarkey, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael F. Mullarkey

Michael F. Mullarkey

Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 19, 2012

/s/ Michael F. Mullarkey

Michael F. Mullarkey

Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 19, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to rVue Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by rVue Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Stockholders' Equity and Stock Based Compensation (Details 2) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Stock-based compensation	$ 6,381	$ 102,251	$ 22,001	$ 263,123
Cost Of Sales [Member]
Stock-based compensation	296	671	889	1,212
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses [Member]
Stock-based compensation	$ 6,085	$ 101,580	$ 21,112	$ 261,911

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details 2) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Balance	$ 1,659,438	$ 100,900
Issuances	167,400	1,282,227
Settlements	(446,419)	(523,119)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings	(896,719)	(376,308)
Transfers into or out of level 3	0	0
Balance	$ 483,700	$ 483,700

XML

Stockholders' Equity and Stock Based Compensation (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity [Table Text Block]

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance at December 31, 2011		3,722,500		$	0.23
Options granted		-		$	-
Options exercised		(1,356,880	)	$	0.20
Options forfeited		(3,120	)	$	0.20
Balance at June 30, 2012		2,362,500		$	0.24		8.23	$	-
Exercisable at June 30, 2012		2,250,834		$	0.24		8.20	$	-
Expected to vest after June 30, 2012		111,666		$	0.30		9.05	$	-

Schedule of Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Table Text Block]

The following table provides a summary of the stock-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of revenue	$	296	$	671	$	889	$	1,212
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6,085		101,580		21,112		261,911
	$	6,381	$	102,251	$	22,001	$	263,123

XML

Subsequent Events (Details Textual) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended			4 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	4 Months Ended			1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Nov. 12, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member]	Jul. 24, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member]	Nov. 12, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member] Warrants Exercisable Within 60 Days [Member]	Nov. 12, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member] Acorn [Member]	Nov. 12, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member] Stock Options Exercisable Within 60 Days [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member] Common Stock [Member]	Jul. 24, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member] Common Stock [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Cash										20,000,000
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Cash										$ 1,200,000
Aggregate Principal Amount Of Notes Issued						1,723,067
Maximum Gross Proceeds From Issuance Of Stock	500,000										500,000
Notes Deemed Conversion Discount Percentage											30.00%
Debt Conversion, Converted Instrument, Amount		$ 1,223,067			$ 1,776,667
Debt Conversion, Converted Instrument, Shares Issued					42,301,442
Common stock, shares issued			38,370,512	37,383,725	100,691,954
Common stock, shares outstanding			38,370,512	37,383,725	100,691,954
Number Of Shares Beneficially Owned By Board Of Director					42,654,878		5,833,333	36,821,545	200,000
Percentage Of Shares Beneficially Owned By Board Of Director					40.20%

XML

Convertible Notes (Details Textual) (USD $)	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011	May 11, 2012	May 10, 2012	Jan. 27, 2012	Nov. 30, 2011
Proceeds from convertible notes	$ 300,000					$ 1,235,000	$ 0
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date								Nov. 30, 2012
Debt Instrument, Convertible, Conversion Price			$ 0.2			$ 0.2			$ 0.147		$ 0.134
Derivative liability			483,700			483,700		100,900				101,600
Embedded Derivative, Gain (Loss) on Embedded Derivative, Net								700
Convertible notes			692,932			692,932		185,248
Long-term Debt, Gross											288,067
Debt Instrument, Unamortized Premium											193,911
Debt Instrument, Unamortized Discount			863,896			863,896					76,700
Loss on early extinguishment of debt			0	17,456	0	17,456	0
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income, Net				24,200
Debt Conversion, Converted Instrument, Amount				1,223,067
Debt Conversion, Converted Instrument, Warrants or Options Issued				3,057,666
Convertible Debt Maximum Aggregate Principal Amount										1,775,000
Convertible Debt Maximum Aggregate Principal Amount Amended										1,275,000
Convertible Debt Additional Issuance									300,000	300,000
Exercise Of Warrants Number Of Common Stock Shares									750,000	750,000
Warrants Exercise Price									$ 0.20	$ 0.20
Convertible Debt Carrying Amount			692,932			692,932
Debt Instrument, Convertible, Interest Expense						33,761
Derivative Warrant Liabilities Reclassified Amount			446,419			446,419
Convertible Debt Embedded Derivative Conversion Feature Value	167,000	705,100				483,700
Fair Value Of Embedded Derivative Conversion Feature and Warrants Increase Decrease			896,719			453,008
Equity Financing Gross Proceeds						500,000
Number Of Subsequent Offering Securities To Be Issued Description						The number of Subsequent Offering Securities to be issued to the holders of the New Notes upon such conversion shall be equal to the quotient, rounded to the nearest whole number, obtained by dividing (x) the unpaid principal amount of the New Note plus any accrued but unpaid interest thereon by the lower of (y) 70% of the price per security issued in the Subsequent Offering or (z) $.20 (the Conversion Price)
Description Of Changes In Price In Case Of Failure To Raise Equity						In the event that we fail to raise $1.5 million in common equity by July 24, 2012, the Conversion Price shall be reduced from $.20 to $.10 and the exercise price of the Series C Warrants shall be reduced to $.10
New Investors [Member]
Proceeds from convertible notes				935,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage											6.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date				Jan. 31, 2013
Debt Instrument, Convertible, Conversion Price											$ 0.2
Pnpa Investors [Member]
Proceeds from convertible notes								$ 285,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage								6.00%
Debt Instrument, Payment Terms								Principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on November 30, 2012. In the event we enter into a strategic investment prior to November 30, 2012, the holder may, at their option, convert the unpaid principal and interest into shares of our common stock at 75% of the price paid by the strategic investor.
Debt Instrument, Convertible, Conversion Price								$ 0.25

XML

Loss Per Common Share

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

Note 3 - Loss Per Common Share

Basic and diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing the loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Since the Company incurred losses attributable to common stockholders during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, diluted loss per common share has not been computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Dilutive common shares include incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants to the extent that the average fair value of the Company’s common stock for each period is greater than the exercise price of the derivative securities, and shares issuable upon the conversion of notes.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(62,519	)	$	(998,643	)	$	(1,796,269	)	$	(1,922,704	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725
Effect of dilutive securities (1)		-			-			-			-
Weighted-average diluted shares		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	0.00		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)

See note 12 regarding significant issuances of Common Stock subsequent to June 30, 2012.

(1) The following stock options, warrants and convertible notes outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per share because the net effect would have been anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Stock options		410,026		3,497,500		410,026		3,497,500
Warrants		754,968		9,674,995		754,968		9,674,995
Convertible Notes		7,784,135		-		7,784,135		-
		8,949,129		13,172,495		8,949,129		13,172,495

XML

Supplemental Non-Cash Information (Details Textual) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Settlements	$ (446,419)	$ (523,119)
Payments of Debt Issuance Costs		$ 95,000
Stock Issued During Period Shares, Settlement For Debt		475,000

XML

Financial Instruments (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 53,565	$ 19,917
Cash [Member]
Cash and cash equivalents	39,680	16,097
Money Market Funds [Member]
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 13,885	$ 3,820

XML

Loss Per Common Share (Details 1)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount	8,949,129	13,172,495	8,949,129	13,172,495
Convertible Notes Payable [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount	7,784,135	0	7,784,135	0
Stock Options [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount	410,026	3,497,500	410,026	3,497,500
Warrant [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount	754,968	9,674,995	754,968	9,674,995

XML

Financial Instruments (Details Textual)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Customer One [Member]
Entity Wide Accounts Receivable Major Customer Percentage	63.40%	72.80%
Customer Two [Member]
Entity Wide Accounts Receivable Major Customer Percentage	31.00%	19.00%

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$ 53,565		$ 19,917	$ 1,057,013	$ 2,334,121
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	483,700	[1]	100,900
Money Market Funds [Member]
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	13,885		3,820
Money Market Funds [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	13,885		3,820
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	0		0
Money Market Funds [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	0		0
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	0		0
Money Market Funds [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	0		0
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$ 483,700		$ 100,900

[1] Based on the minimum extreme distribution applied in the analyses, certain iterations of the simulation imply a Subsequent Offering prior to the valuation date. When this occurs, the model assumes that no Subsequent Offering took place. This ensures that there is less than a 100% probability of a Subsequent Offering taking place, which we believe is reasonable.

XML

Going Concern

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Going Concern [Abstract]

Going Concern [Text Block]

Note 2 – Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have sustained losses and experienced negative cash flows from operations since inception, and have an accumulated deficit of $7,573,854 at June 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate in the normal course of business. We have funded our activities to date almost exclusively from equity and debt financings.

We will continue to require substantial funds to continue development of our core business. Management’s plans in order to help meet our operating cash flow requirements include (i) financing activities such as private placements of common stock, and issuances of debt and convertible debt instruments, (ii) staff reductions, (iii) a hiring and expansion freeze, and (iv) the establishment of strategic relationships which we believe will lead to the generation of additional revenue opportunities. Subsequent to June 30, 2012, we raised an additional $1,200,000 through the sale of common stock that also triggered the conversion of secured convertible promissory notes (the “New Notes”) that had been issued between January 27, 2012 and July 24, 2012, into 42,301,442 shares of Common Stock. See Note 12 “Subsequent Events” for further information.

While we believe that we will be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund our operations, there are no assurances that such additional funding will be achieved or that we will succeed in our future operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details 1) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Measurement Date	Jun. 30, 2012	[1]
Derivative liability	$ 483,700	[1]	$ 100,900
Fair Value Measurements, Valuation Techniques	Binomial lattice model simulation	[1]
Fair Value Measurements, Changes in Valuation Techniques	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step) Volatility	[1]
Fair Value Inputs, Cap Rate	45.00%
Average Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	20	[1]
Embedded Derivative In New Notes Issued [Member]
Fair Value Measurement Date	May 10, 2012	[1]
Derivative liability	690,600	[1]
Fair Value Measurements, Valuation Techniques	Binomial lattice model simulation	[1]
Fair Value Measurements, Changes in Valuation Techniques	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step) Volatility	[1]
Fair Value Inputs, Cap Rate	45.00%
Average Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	67	[1]
Embedded Derivative In New Notes Issued One [Member]
Fair Value Measurement Date	May 11, 2012	[1]
Derivative liability	167,400	[1]
Fair Value Measurements, Valuation Techniques	Binomial lattice model simulation	[1]
Fair Value Measurements, Changes in Valuation Techniques	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step) Volatility	[1]
Fair Value Inputs, Cap Rate	45.00%
Average Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	65	[1]
Series C Warrants Issued [Member]
Derivative liability	0.146
Fair Value Measurements, Valuation Techniques	Binomial lattice model simulation
Fair Value Measurements, Changes in Valuation Techniques	Volatility
Fair Value Inputs, Cap Rate	45.00%
Series C Warrants Issued One [Member]
Derivative liability	$ 0.147
Fair Value Measurements, Valuation Techniques	Binomial lattice model simulation
Fair Value Measurements, Changes in Valuation Techniques	Volatility
Fair Value Inputs, Cap Rate	45.00%
Maximum [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	666	[1]
Maximum [Member] | Embedded Derivative In New Notes Issued [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	603	[1]
Maximum [Member] | Embedded Derivative In New Notes Issued One [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	600	[1]
Maximum [Member] | Series C Warrants Issued [Member]
Fair Value Measurement Date	May 11, 2012
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	nm
Maximum [Member] | Series C Warrants Issued One [Member]
Fair Value Measurement Date	May 11, 2012
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	nm
Minimum [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	(2,436)	[1]
Minimum [Member] | Embedded Derivative In New Notes Issued [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	(1,790)	[1]
Minimum [Member] | Embedded Derivative In New Notes Issued One [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	(1,716)	[1]
Minimum [Member] | Series C Warrants Issued [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	nm
Minimum [Member] | Series C Warrants Issued One [Member]
Range Used To Determine Fair Value Of Embeded Derivatives	nm

[1] Based on the minimum extreme distribution applied in the analyses, certain iterations of the simulation imply a Subsequent Offering prior to the valuation date. When this occurs, the model assumes that no Subsequent Offering took place. This ensures that there is less than a 100% probability of a Subsequent Offering taking place, which we believe is reasonable.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textual) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Description of Lessor Leasing Arrangements, Operating Leases	The lease is for a period of three years beginning July 1, 2010, and provides for one renewal option of three years.
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	$ 76,088
Operating Leases, Rent Expense, Net	$ 45,816	$ 38,044

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 53,565	$ 19,917
Accounts receivable	64,580	105,203
Prepaid expenses	85,135	180,573
Other current assets	64,167	0
Total current assets	267,447	305,693
Property and equipment, net	28,455	46,829
Software development costs	94,984	244,498
Deposits	17,488	17,388
Assets	408,374	614,408
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Accounts payable	166,589	202,142
Accrued expenses	479,872	456,339
Convertible notes	692,932	185,248
Derivative liability	483,700	100,900
Deferred revenue	31,975	31,975
Total current liabilities	1,855,068	976,604
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	0	0
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share; 140,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011; 38,370,512 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 37,383,725 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011	38,371	37,384
Additional paid-in capital	6,088,789	5,378,005
Accumulated deficit	(7,573,854)	(5,777,585)
Total stockholders' deficit	(1,446,694)	(362,196)
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 408,374	$ 614,408

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Operating activities
Net loss	$ (1,796,269)	$ (1,922,704)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	295,689	309,392
Stock-based compensation expense	22,001	263,123
Common stock issued for services	38,000	21,285
Convertible loan interest	647,705	0
Change in fair value of derivative instruments	(453,008)	0
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	17,456	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	40,623	(2,626)
Prepaid expenses	95,438	(35,946)
Accounts payable	(35,553)	41,561
Accrued expenses	23,533	164,012
Deferred revenue	0	0
Cash used in operating activities	(1,104,284)	(1,161,903)
Investing activities
Payments for property, equipment and software development	(96,968)	(287,217)
Repayments by (advances to) Argo Digital Solutions, Inc.	0	172,012
Change in deposits	(100)	0
Cash used in investing activities	(97,068)	(115,205)
Financing activities
Proceeds from convertible notes	1,235,000	0
Cash provided by financing activities	1,235,000	0
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	33,648	(1,277,108)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	19,917	2,334,121
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 53,565	$ 1,057,013

XML

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Prepaid expenses
Consulting fees	$ 0	$ 16,200
Insurance	22,344	16,109
Investor relations fees	5,000	10,000
Licenses and subscriptions	37,457	20,958
Other	890	1,612
Rent	15,039	15,252
Services	4,405	5,233
Unamortized investment banking fee warrants	0	95,209
Prepaid Expense, Current, Total	85,135	180,573
Property and Equipment
Computers and Software	90,259	89,757
Furniture and equipment	22,574	22,574
Gross property and equipment	112,833	112,331
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(84,378)	(65,502)
Net property and equipment	28,455	46,829
Estimated Useful Lives, Furniture and Equipment	3 years
Software Development Costs
Software development costs	1,026,929	930,461
Less accumulated amortization	(931,945)	(685,963)
Net software development costs	94,984	244,498
Estimated Useful Lives, Software	18 months
Accrued Expenses
Investor relations fees	158,300	150,000
Personnel costs	100,681	131,703
Directors fees	101,666	57,000
Professional fees	44,608	44,494
Deferred rent	15,242	26,642
Network costs	37,691	29,323
Other	21,684	17,177
Accrued Expenses	$ 479,872	$ 456,339
Maximum [Member]
Property and Equipment
Estimated Useful Lives, Computers and Software	5 years
Minimum [Member]
Property and Equipment
Estimated Useful Lives, Computers and Software	2 years

XML

Financial Instruments (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value, by Balance Sheet Grouping [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Cash	$	39,680	$	16,097
Cash equivalents - money market funds		13,885		3,820
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	53,565	$	19,917

XML

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details (Details Textual) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Other current assets	$ 64,167		$ 0
Payments of Debt Issuance Costs	95,000
Amortization Of Debt Issuance Costs	30,833
Depreciation	18,874	23,179
Amortization	$ 245,982	$ 286,212

XML

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details [Abstract]

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details [Table Text Block]

The following tables show the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statement details as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Prepaid expenses	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Consulting fees	$	-	$	16,200
Insurance		22,344		16,109
Investor relations fees		5,000		10,000
Licenses and subscriptions		37,457		20,958
Other		890		1,612
Rent		15,039		15,252
Services		4,405		5,233
Unamortized investment banking fee warrants		-		95,209
	$	85,135	$	180,573

In addition, the Company recorded Other current assets of $64,167 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, consisting of debt issuance costs of $95,000, reduced by amortization of those costs totaling $30,833.

Property and Equipment	Estimated Useful Lives	June 30,			December 31,
	(Years)	2012			2011
Computers and software	2 - 5	$	90,259		$	89,757
Furniture and equipment	3		22,574			22,574
Gross property and equipment			112,833			112,331
Less accumulated depreciation			(84,378	)		(65,502	)
Net property and equipment		$	28,455		$	46,829

Depreciation expense was $18,874 and $23,179 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Software Development Costs	Estimated Useful Lives	June 30,			December 31,
	(Months)	2012			2011
Software development costs	18	$	1,026,929		$	930,461
Less accumulated amortization			(931,945	)		(685,963	)
Net software development costs		$	94,984		$	244,498

Amortization expense was $245,982 and $286,212 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Accrued Expenses	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Investor relations fees	$	158,300	$	150,000
Personnel costs		100,681		131,703
Directors fees		101,666		57,000
Professional fees		44,608		44,494
Deferred rent		15,242		26,642
Network costs		37,691		29,323
Other		21,684		17,177
	$	479,872	$	456,339

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

rVue Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Rivulet International, Inc. (“We”, “rVue” or the “Company”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 12, 2008. We are an advertising technology company that has developed and operates an integrated advertising exchange and digital distribution platform – rVue – for the Digital Out-of-Home (“DOOH”) industry.

Basis of Presentation and Preparation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to accounts receivable, fair values of financial instruments, useful lives of capitalized software developments costs and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.

The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2011 Form 10-K”).

The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS [PARENTHETICAL] (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	140,000,000	140,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	38,370,512	37,383,725
Common stock, shares outstanding	38,370,512	37,383,725

XML

Related Party Transactions and Certain Other Transactions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 11 - Related Party Transactions and Certain Other Transactions

In September 2009 we and Argo Digital Solutions, Inc. (“Argo”), the company from whom we acquired substantially all our assets in May 2010, entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the “TSA”). Argo agreed to provide certain general and administrative services, including labor, technology, facilities and other services to us on an as needed basis in exchange for cash consideration. The TSA was terminated on May 13, 2010 and, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement between us and Argo as of May 13, 2010, any and all advances and payments made by us to or on behalf of Argo and owing by Argo to us were to be repaid by Argo on or prior to May 13, 2011, with interest at ten (10%) percent per annum. At December 31, 2010, we had advanced a net of $172,012 to Argo, including accrued interest of $9,753. On January 17, 2011, Argo repaid the balance then outstanding in full.

We paid a consulting fee of $10,000 to one of our directors during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, and reimbursed the director $9,920 for out-of pocket expenses incurred in connection with our business during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

In March 2011, we entered into a Consulting/Services Agreement to facilitate the marketing and promotion of direct TV advertised products with Acorn Composite Corporation (“Acorn”), an entity that is wholly owned by Robert Roche, a stockholder and director of ours who beneficially owns 40.2% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock as of November 1, 2012. We did not record any significant revenue under this contract in either of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

In January 2012, in connection with the sale of the New Notes, we agreed to reimburse an investor (the “Lead Investor”) $65,000 for costs and expenses incurred by it (including, without limitation, legal and administrative fees) payable in cash or shares of our Common Stock at our election. On February 8, 2012, we issued 325,000 shares of our Common Stock to the Lead Investor as payment. Robert Roche, who is the sole stockholder of Acorn, is the grantor of the trust that controls the majority member of the Lead Investor. His sister is the manager of both the Lead Investor and the majority member of the Lead Investor. As of November 8, 2012, the Lead Investor beneficially owns 17.6% of our outstanding Common Stock. Mr. Roche disclaims any beneficial ownership of securities held by the Lead Investor as he does not have voting or dispositive powers over such securities. In addition another one of our directors is a minority member of the Lead Investor.

In May 2012, the Company and the Lead Investor agreed to amend the agreement with the investors in the New Notes to: (i) issue up to an additional $500,000 of Notes, (ii) remove the ratchet language providing for an adjustment to the conversion price of the Notes and the exercise price of the Warrants in the event $1.5 million in common equity was not raised by the Company within 180 days of the original sale of the Notes, and (iii) change the collateral agent from David A. Loppert to Theresa M. Roche.

On May 11, 2012, the Company issued additional New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 (out of the additional $500,000 that was just authorized) and Series C Warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of our common stock (the “Warrant Stock”), at $.20 per share (the “Warrant Price”) exercisable for a period of five years to Acorn. We received net proceeds of $300,000 from the sale of these additional New Notes.

The Warrant Stock may be redeemed prior to the expiration date of the Warrants, at the option of the Company, at a price of $.001 per share (the “Redemption Price”) upon 10 days written notice to the Holder; provided that (i) our shares of common stock have had a closing sales price greater than $1.00 per share for twenty (20) consecutive trading days and (ii) at the date of the redemption notice and during the entire redemption period there is an effective registration statement covering the resale of the Warrant Stock. The Warrant may be exercised by the Holder, for cash, at any time after notice of redemption has been given by the Company and prior to the time and date fixed for redemption. On and after the redemption date, the Holder shall have no further rights except to receive, upon surrender of the Warrant, the Redemption Price of the applicable Warrant Stock.

XML

DOCUMENT AND ENTITY INFORMATION	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Nov. 12, 2012
Entity Registrant Name	rVue Holdings, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001455206
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Trading Symbol	rvue
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		100,691,954
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012

XML

Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events [Text Block]

Note 12 – Subsequent Events

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date of filing.

On September 10, 2012, we sold 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Acorn, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $1,200,000 (the “Equity Financing”).  The shares of Common Stock were issued to Acorn without registration in reliance upon the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction by the Company not involving any public offering.

Previously, between January 27, 2012 and July 24, 2012, the Company had issued New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,723,067.  Pursuant to Section 3.1 of the New Notes, upon the Company selling shares of Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of at least $500,000 (“Subsequent Offering”), then all of the unpaid principal amount of the New Notes and any accrued and unpaid interest thereon will automatically (without any further action required by the holders of the New Notes) be deemed converted into shares of Common Stock at a 30% discount to the price in the Subsequent Offering (the “Note Conversions”).

Since the Equity Financing qualifies as a Subsequent Offering, the principal of and accrued interest on the New Notes, aggregating $1,776,667, automatically converted into an aggregate of 42,301,442 shares of Common Stock upon consummation of the Equity Financing.  Immediately following the consummation of the Equity Financing and the Note Conversions, the Company had 100,691,954 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

As of November 12, 2012, Robert Roche, a member of our Board of Directors, is deemed to beneficially own 42,654,878 shares of Common Stock, or 40.2%, consisting of: (i) 200,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days, (ii) 36,821,545 shares that are owned by Acorn (of which Mr. Roche is the sole owner and therefore may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over such securities) and (iii) 5,833,333 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants that are exercisable within 60 days that are owned by Acorn.

Following the conversion of the Notes, the first priority security interest on all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ assets that was held by the holders of the Notes was terminated.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Revenue
rVue advertising revenue	$ 11,510	$ 0	$ 27,829	$ 124,443
Network	95,925	108,461	211,094	220,499
Sales Revenue	107,435	108,461	238,923	344,942
Costs and expenses
Cost of revenue	15,051	45,218	71,260	149,487
Selling, general and administrative expenses	528,291	878,917	1,456,138	1,812,029
Depreciation and amortization	172,021	183,874	295,689	309,392
Interest income	(34)	(905)	(170)	(3,262)
Interest expense	351,344	0	647,827	0
Change in fair value of derivative	(896,719)	0	453,008	0
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	0	0	(17,456)	0
Operating Expenses	169,954	1,107,104	2,035,192	2,267,646
Loss before provision for income taxes	(62,519)	(998,643)	(1,796,269)	(1,922,704)
Provision for income taxes	0	0	0	0
Net loss	$ (62,519)	$ (998,643)	$ (1,796,269)	$ (1,922,704)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.00	$ (0.03)	$ (0.05)	$ (0.05)
Shares used in computing net loss per share:
Basic and diluted (in shares)	38,171,099	37,273,725	37,917,448	37,273,725

XML

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details [Abstract]

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details [Text Block]

Note 6 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement Details

The following tables show the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statement details as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Prepaid expenses	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Consulting fees	$	-	$	16,200
Insurance		22,344		16,109
Investor relations fees		5,000		10,000
Licenses and subscriptions		37,457		20,958
Other		890		1,612
Rent		15,039		15,252
Services		4,405		5,233
Unamortized investment banking fee warrants		-		95,209
	$	85,135	$	180,573

In addition, the Company recorded Other current assets of $64,167 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, consisting of debt issuance costs of $95,000, reduced by amortization of those costs totaling $30,833.

Property and Equipment	Estimated Useful Lives	June 30,			December 31,
	(Years)	2012			2011
Computers and software	2 - 5	$	90,259		$	89,757
Furniture and equipment	3		22,574			22,574
Gross property and equipment			112,833			112,331
Less accumulated depreciation			(84,378	)		(65,502	)
Net property and equipment		$	28,455		$	46,829

Depreciation expense was $18,874 and $23,179 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Software Development Costs	Estimated Useful Lives	June 30,			December 31,
	(Months)	2012			2011
Software development costs	18	$	1,026,929		$	930,461
Less accumulated amortization			(931,945	)		(685,963	)
Net software development costs		$	94,984		$	244,498

Amortization expense was $245,982 and $286,212 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Accrued Expenses	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Investor relations fees	$	158,300	$	150,000
Personnel costs		100,681		131,703
Directors fees		101,666		57,000
Professional fees		44,608		44,494
Deferred rent		15,242		26,642
Network costs		37,691		29,323
Other		21,684		17,177
	$	479,872	$	456,339

XML

Fair Value Measurements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable directly or indirectly.

Level 3 - Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable.

We are responsible for the valuation process and as part of this process we used data from an outside source to establish fair value. We performed due diligence to understand the inputs used or how the data was calculated or derived, and we corroborated the reasonableness of external inputs in the valuation process.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
June 30, 2012
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$	13,885	$	-	$	-	$	13,885
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	483,700	$	483,700
December 31, 2011
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$	3,820	$	-	$	-	$	3,820
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	100,900	$	100,900

The fair value of the money market funds, classified as Level 1, utilized quoted prices in active markets. The fair value of derivative liabilities, classified as Level 3, utilized a simulation analysis using a binomial lattice model and other unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes the valuation techniques, the inputs and the ranges used to determine the fair value of our Level 3 embedded derivatives and Series C warrants at June 30, 2012:

Liability	Measurement Date	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (low)		Range (high)	Average			Note
Embedded derivative in New Notes Issued	5/10/12	$	690,600	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(1,790	)	603		67			(1	)
1/27/12					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Series C Warrants Issued 1/27/12	5/10/2012	$	0.146	Binomial lattice model simulation	Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Embedded derivative in New Notes Issued	5/11/2012	$	167,400	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(1,716	)	600		65			(1	)
5/11/12					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Series C Warrants Issued 5/11/12	5/11/2012	$	0.147	Binomial lattice model simulation	Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Embedded derivative in New Notes	6/30/2012	$	483,700	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(2,436	)	666		20			(1	)
					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%

Notes:

(1) Based on the minimum extreme distribution applied in the analyses, certain iterations of the simulation imply a Subsequent Offering prior to the valuation date. When this occurs, the model assumes that no Subsequent Offering took place. This ensures that there is less than a 100% probability of a Subsequent Offering taking place, which we believe is reasonable.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our embedded derivative instrument and the Series C Warrants include the expected size and timing of a Subsequent Offering, as well as the assumed forward volatility. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation would result in lower or higher fair value measurement. In general the fair value of the embedded derivatives are (i) inversely related to the size of a Subsequent Offering, (ii) are positively related to the expected timing of a Subsequent Offering and (iii) are positively related to the assumed forward volatility.

Rollforward of Level 3 Liabilities

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the three- month period ended June 30, 2012:

Balance, April 1, 2012	$	1,659,438
Issuances		167,400
Settlements		(446,419	)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings		(896,719	)
Transfers into or out of level 3		-
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	483,700

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the six- month period ended June 30, 2012:

Balance, January 1, 2012	$	100,900
Issuances		1,282,227
Settlements		(523,119	)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings		(376,308	)
Transfers into or out of level 3		-
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	483,700

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Table Text Block]

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
June 30, 2012
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$	13,885	$	-	$	-	$	13,885
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	483,700	$	483,700
December 31, 2011
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds	$	3,820	$	-	$	-	$	3,820
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	100,900	$	100,900

Fair Value Inputs, Assets, Quantitative Information [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the valuation techniques, the inputs and the ranges used to determine the fair value of our Level 3 embedded derivatives and Series C warrants at June 30, 2012:

Liability	Measurement Date	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (low)		Range (high)	Average			Note
Embedded derivative in New Notes Issued	5/10/12	$	690,600	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(1,790	)	603		67			(1	)
1/27/12					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Series C Warrants Issued 1/27/12	5/10/2012	$	0.146	Binomial lattice model simulation	Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Embedded derivative in New Notes Issued	5/11/2012	$	167,400	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(1,716	)	600		65			(1	)
5/11/12					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Series C Warrants Issued 5/11/12	5/11/2012	$	0.147	Binomial lattice model simulation	Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%
Embedded derivative in New Notes	6/30/2012	$	483,700	Binomial lattice model simulation	Timing of Subsequent Offering (lattice step)	(2,436	)	666		20			(1	)
					Volatility	nm		nm		45.0	%

Notes:

(1) Based on the minimum extreme distribution applied in the analyses, certain iterations of the simulation imply a Subsequent Offering prior to the valuation date. When this occurs, the model assumes that no Subsequent Offering took place. This ensures that there is less than a 100% probability of a Subsequent Offering taking place, which we believe is reasonable.

Fair Value, Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Table Text Block]

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the three- month period ended June 30, 2012:

Balance, April 1, 2012	$	1,659,438
Issuances		167,400
Settlements		(446,419	)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings		(896,719	)
Transfers into or out of level 3		-
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	483,700

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities for the six- month period ended June 30, 2012:

Balance, January 1, 2012	$	100,900
Issuances		1,282,227
Settlements		(523,119	)
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in earnings		(376,308	)
Transfers into or out of level 3		-
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	483,700

XML

Supplemental Non-Cash Information

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Supplemental Non Cash Information [Abstract]

Supplemental Non Cash Information [Text Block]

Note 13 – Supplemental Non-Cash Information

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company modified the warrants resulting in a reclassification of the derivative warrant liability to equity totaling $446,419. Additionally during the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company paid debt issuance costs of $95,000 by issuing 475,000 shares of its stock. There were no non-cash transactions noted for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

XML

Stockholders' Equity and Stock Based Compensation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Shareholders' Equity and Share-based Payments [Text Block]

Note 9 - Stockholders’ Equity and Stock Based Compensation

Equity Awards

Stock Option Activity

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance at December 31, 2011		3,722,500		$	0.23
Options granted		-		$	-
Options exercised		(1,356,880	)	$	0.20
Options forfeited		(3,120	)	$	0.20
Balance at June 30, 2012		2,362,500		$	0.24		8.23	$	-
Exercisable at June 30, 2012		2,250,834		$	0.24		8.20	$	-
Expected to vest after June 30, 2012		111,666		$	0.30		9.05	$	-

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period in excess of the weighted-average exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable. The aggregate intrinsic value excludes the effect of stock options that have a zero or negative intrinsic value.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost for stock options is estimated at the grant date based on the fair-value as calculated by the Black-Scholes Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model. The BSM option-pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected volatility, expected life and interest rates. The Company’s computation of expected life is determined based on the simplified method as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded. The interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on comparable companies’ average historical volatility. The Company does not expect to pay dividends. While the Company believes these estimates are reasonable, the estimated compensation expense would increase if the expected life was increased or a higher expected volatility was used. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

We did not grant any options during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 or 2011.

The following table provides a summary of the stock-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of revenue	$	296	$	671	$	889	$	1,212
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6,085		101,580		21,112		261,911
	$	6,381	$	102,251	$	22,001	$	263,123

XML

Convertible Notes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]

Convertible Notes [Text Block]

Note 7 – Convertible Notes

In November and December 2011 we entered into certain Promissory Note Purchase Agreements (“PNPAs”) in the aggregate principal amount of $285,000 with certain investors, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the “PNPA Investors”). We issued $285,000 of Secured Convertible Secured Promissory Notes (the “Notes”). The Notes are secured by all of our assets and bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on November 30, 2012. In the event we enter into a strategic investment prior to November 30, 2012, the holder may, at their option, convert the unpaid principal and interest into shares of our common stock at 75% of the price paid by the strategic investor. At maturity, at the option of the holder, unpaid principal and interest may be converted into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $.25.

We determined that the embedded conversion feature in the Notes is a derivative as defined in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, (“ASC 815”). The key factors in this analysis included: (i) determining that the conversion feature met the definition of a derivative, and (ii) that a scope exception was not applicable to the Company, as the conversion feature was not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock, due to the various potential adjustments to the conversion price.

Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value and are then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. At November 30, 2011 we valued the derivative instrument at $101,600 and at December 31, 2011 we valued the derivative instrument at $100,900, recognizing a $700 change in fair value.

The initial fair value of the derivative was recorded as a reduction of the Notes. This original issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes. At December 31, 2011, the Notes were carried at $185,248, which is net of unamortized original issue discount of $101,600. On January 27, 2012 the Notes, which with accrued interest, had an outstanding balance of $288,067, were exchanged, as discussed below. The Notes were carried at $193,911, net of unamortized original issue discount of $76,700, resulting in a loss on early extinguishment of the Notes of $17,456, and a gain of $24,200 on the change in the fair value of derivatives.

On January 27, 2012, we entered into Secured Promissory Note Purchase Agreements (“New Agreements”) with investors (“New Investors”) for the purchase of promissory notes (“New Notes”) with an aggregate principal amount of $935,000. The PNPA Investors agreed to convert their Notes, totaling $288,067, into New Notes. We issued to the New Investors and the PNPA Investors New Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1,223,067 and warrants to purchase 3,057,666 shares of our common stock at $.20 per share, exercisable for a period of five years (the “Series C Warrants”). The New Notes are secured by all of our assets and bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Principal and accrued interest is due at maturity on January 31, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”). If, prior to maturity, we consummate a financing or related financing of equity securities with aggregate gross proceeds of a least $500,000 (collectively, a “Subsequent Offering”) then all of the unpaid principal amount of the New Notes and any accrued but unpaid interest thereon shall automatically be deemed converted into fully paid and non-assessable securities of the Company sold in the Subsequent Offering (the “Subsequent Offering Securities”) on the same terms and conditions as the other investors in the Subsequent Offering; provided, however, that the number of Subsequent Offering Securities to be issued to the holders of the New Notes upon such conversion shall be equal to the quotient, rounded to the nearest whole number, obtained by dividing (x) the unpaid principal amount of the New Note plus any accrued but unpaid interest thereon by the lower of (y) 70% of the price per security issued in the Subsequent Offering or (z) $.20 (the “Conversion Price”). If no Subsequent Offering is closed by the Company by the Maturity Date, then all of the unpaid principal and interest due under the New Notes will be due and payable, and may, at the option of the holder, be converted into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.20. In the event that we fail to raise $1.5 million in common equity by July 24, 2012, the Conversion Price shall be reduced from $.20 to $.10 and the exercise price of the Series C Warrants shall be reduced to $.10 (“Ratchet Provision”).

On May 10, 2012, we amended the New Agreement to: (i) increase the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Notes issuable under the New Agreement to $1,775,000 from $1,275,000, (ii) remove the ratchet provision in the New Agreement and all references thereto in the Notes and Warrants, and (iii) change the collateral agent with respect thereto.

On May 11, 2012, we issued additional New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 and Series C Warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share, exercisable for a period of five years to an entity that is wholly owned by a stockholder and director of ours. We received net proceeds of $300,000 from the sale of these additional New Notes.

We determined that the embedded conversion feature in the New Notes and the Series C Warrants are derivatives as defined in ASC 815. At January 27, 2012 we valued the embedded derivative conversion feature of the New Notes at $705,100 and the Series C Warrants at $.134 per warrant. The initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature and warrants was recorded as a reduction of the New Notes. This original issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes. We valued the embedded derivative conversion feature of the New Notes issued on May 11, 2012 at $167,000 and the Series C Warrants at $0.147 per warrant. The initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature and warrants was recorded as a reduction of the New Notes. This original issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Notes. The warrants issued with the New Notes on May 11, 2012 did not meet the definition of a derivative, and were recorded as additional paid-in capital. At June 30, 2012, the New Notes are carried at $692,932, which includes accrued interest of $33,761 and which is net of unamortized original issue discount of $863,896. Because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs, management has determined it is not practical to estimate the fair value of the New Notes.

Pursuant to the amended New Agreement discussed above, the ratchet provision contained in the original agreements has been removed.  Since the Series C Warrants no longer had derivative features as a result of the modification, the amount of derivative warrant liabilities associated with the shares have been reclassified from derivative warrant liabilities to additional paid-in capital. The amount reclassified due to this modification was $446,419. As discussed above, the embedded derivative conversion feature contains other adjustment provisions in addition to the Ratchet Provision, and the removal of the Ratchet Provision did not change the classification of the embedded derivative conversion feature as a derivative liability.

At June 30, 2012 we valued the embedded derivative conversion feature of the New Notes at $483,700. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, fair value of the embedded derivative conversion feature and the Series C Warrants decreased by $896,719 and increased by $453,008, respectively.

XML

Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 8 - Income Taxes

There is no income tax benefit for the losses for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, since management has determined that the realization of the net deferred tax asset is not more likely than not to be realized and has created a valuation allowance for the entire amount of such benefit.

Our policy is to record interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits as additional income taxes in the statement of operations. At December 31, 2011, we had no unrecognized tax benefits, or any tax related interest or penalties. There were no changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the period ended June 30, 2012. We did not recognize any interest or penalties during 2011 related to unrecognized tax benefits, or through the period ended June 30, 2012.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

Other Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

We lease our Ft. Lauderdale office space under a non-cancelable operating lease. The lease is for a period of three years beginning July 1, 2010, and provides for one renewal option of three years. Effective October 1, 2011, we entered into a one-year lease agreement for an office in an executive office complex in New York City. As of June 30, 2012, our total future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable operating leases was $76,088. Rent expense was $45,816 and $38,044 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We do not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Contingencies

We are subject to certain legal proceedings that have not been adjudicated, which are discussed in Part II, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q under the heading “Legal Proceedings”. In the opinion of management, the Company does not have probable liability related to these legal proceedings that would materially adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we fail to prevail in any of these legal matters, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details Textual)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Subsequent Offering Percentage	100.00%

XML

Loss Per Common Share (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(62,519	)	$	(998,643	)	$	(1,796,269	)	$	(1,922,704	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725
Effect of dilutive securities (1)		-			-			-			-
Weighted-average diluted shares		38,171,099			37,273,725			37,917,448			37,273,725
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	0.00		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.05	)

Schedule of Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Table Text Block]

(1) The following stock options, warrants and convertible notes outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per share because the net effect would have been anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Stock options		410,026		3,497,500		410,026		3,497,500
Warrants		754,968		9,674,995		754,968		9,674,995
Convertible Notes		7,784,135		-		7,784,135		-
		8,949,129		13,172,495		8,949,129		13,172,495

XML

Going Concern (Details Textual) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jul. 24, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Accumulated deficit		$ (7,573,854)	$ (5,777,585)
Stock Issued During Period, Value, New Issues	$ 1,200,000
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues	42,301,442

XML

Related Party Transactions and Certain Other Transactions (Details Textual) (USD $)	1 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	Feb. 29, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012	May 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Nov. 12, 2012	Nov. 08, 2012	May 11, 2012	May 10, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Related Party Transaction Interest Rate				10.00%
Due From Argo Digital Solutions, Inc.												$ 172,012
Interest Receivable												9,753
Consultation Fee Paid, Related Party						10,000
Expenses Reimbursed, Related Party			65,000			9,920
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage											40.20%
Stock Issued During Period Shares Payment Of Expenses		325,000
Beneficially Owns Of Outstanding Common Stock Percentage							40.20%	17.60%
Maximum Gross Proceeds From Issuance Of Stock	500,000
Exercise Price Of Common Share Equity	1,500,000			500,000
Convertible Debt Additional Issuance									300,000	300,000
Exercise Of Warrants Number Of Common Stock Shares									750,000	750,000
Warrants Exercise Price									$ 0.20	$ 0.20
Proceeds from convertible notes	$ 300,000				$ 1,235,000	$ 0
Common Stock Closing Sales Price					$ 1.00
Warrants Redemption Price					$ 0.001

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (USD $)	Preferred Stock [Member]	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Total
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	$ 0	$ 37,384	$ 5,378,005	$ (5,777,585)	$ (362,196)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2011	0	37,383,725
Common stock issued for services and debt issuance costs	0	635	132,466	0	133,101
Common stock issued for services and debt issuance costs (in shares)	0	635,000
Common stock issued upon exercise of options	0	352	(352)	0	0
Common stock issued upon exercise of options (in shares)	0	351,787			(1,356,880)
Stock-based compensation expense	0	0	22,001	0	22,001
Elimination of derivative warrant	0	0	446,419	0	446,419
Issuance of warrants included in the convertible debt	0	0	110,250	0	110,250
Net loss	0	0	0	(1,796,269)	(1,796,269)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2012	$ 0	$ 38,371	$ 6,088,789	$ (7,573,854)	$ (1,446,694)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2012	0	38,370,512

XML

Financial Instruments

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Investments, All Other Investments [Abstract]

Financial Instruments Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 4 – Financial Instruments

Cash and cash equivalents

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Cash	$	39,680	$	16,097
Cash equivalents - money market funds		13,885		3,820
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	53,565	$	19,917

Accounts Receivable

We sell our services directly to our customers. We generally do not require collateral from our customers; however, we will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk. Accounts receivable from two of our customers accounted for 63.4%, and 31.0% of total accounts receivable at June 30, 2012, and 72.8% and 19.0% from two of our customers at December 31, 2011. We had no allowance for doubtful accounts at either June 30, 2012 or at December 31, 2011.

XML

Loss Per Common Share (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Numerator:
Net loss (in dollars)	$ (62,519)	$ (998,643)	$ (1,796,269)	$ (1,922,704)
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in shares)	38,171,099	37,273,725	37,917,448	37,273,725
Effect of dilutive securities (1)	0	0	0	0
Weighted-average diluted shares (in shares)	38,171,099	37,273,725	37,917,448	37,273,725
Basic and diluted loss per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.00	$ (0.03)	$ (0.05)	$ (0.05)

XML

Stockholders' Equity and Stock Based Compensation (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Number of Options, Balance at December 31, 2011 (in shares)	3,722,500
Number of Options, Options granted (in shares)	0
Number of Options, Options exercised (in shares)	(1,356,880)
Number of Options, Options forfeited (in shares)	(3,120)
Number of Options, Balance at June 30, 2012 (in shares)	2,362,500
Number of Options, Exercisable at June 30, 2012 (in shares)	2,250,834
Number of Options, Expected to vest after June 30, 2012 (in shares)	111,666
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Balance at December 31, 2011 (in dollars per share)	$ 0.23
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Options granted (in dollars per share)	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Options exercised (in dollars per share)	$ 0.20
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Options forfeited (in dollars per share)	$ 0.20
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Balance at June 30, 2012 (in dollars per share)	$ 0.24
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Exercisable at June 30, 2012 (in dollars per share)	$ 0.24
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share, Expected to vest after June 30, 2012 (in dollars per share)	$ 0.30
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term, Balance at June 30, 2012	8 years 2 months 23 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term, Exercisable at June 30, 2012	8 years 2 months 12 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term, Expected to vest after June 30, 2012	9 years 18 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Balance at June 30, 2012 (in dollars)	$ 0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Exercisable at June 30, 2012 (in dollars)	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Expected to vest after June 30, 2012 (in dollars)	$ 0

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation and Preparation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to accounts receivable, fair values of financial instruments, useful lives of capitalized software developments costs and property and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.

The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2011 Form 10-K”).

The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.