10-Q 1 ecau-10q_093013.htm QUARTERLY REPORT

 


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
 
x  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
 
OR
 
o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
 
Commission File Number: 000-53681
 
ECHO AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Nevada
98-0599680
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation)
Identification No.)
 
16000 N. 80th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(855) 324-6288
(Registrant’s telephone number)
 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:  Yes  x   No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  x   No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non–accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer  o          Accelerated filer  o          Non–Accelerated filer  o          Smaller Reporting Company  x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o   No  x
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
Class
 
Outstanding at November 12, 2013
Common stock, par value $.001
 
86,978,019
 
 
 

 

 
Echo Automotive, Inc.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

 
     
Page Numbers
   
       
   
   
2
   
3
   
4
   
5
   
6
 
13
 
17
 
17
       
   
       
 
19
 
19
 
19
 
19
 
19
 
19
 
20
       
 
21
 
1
 

 

 
 
 
ECHO AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
           
   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
   
(unaudited)
       
Assets
           
Current assets:
           
    Cash   $ 245,605     $ 1,879  
Other current assets
    74,400       59,027  
Total current assets
    320,005       60,906  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    758,460       154,497  
Intangibles, net
    3,313,894       47,500  
Total assets
  $ 4,392,359     $ 262,903  
                 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
               
                 
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 153,473     $ 210,760  
Accounts payable - related party
    27,073        
Bank overdraft
          37,616  
Accrued liabilities
    344,826       189,450  
Related party advances
    126,603       100,000  
Current portion of notes payable, net of debt discount of $18,557 and $0 for September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively
    691,443       150,000  
Total current liabilities
    1,343,418       687,826  
                 
Long-term portion of notes payable, net of current portion and debt discount of $480,716 and $9,214 for September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively
    549,284       581,786  
Total liabilities
    1,892,702       1,269,612  
                 
Contingencies and commitments
               
                 
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
               
    Common stock, par value $.001, 650,000,000 shares authorized; 86,527,778 and 75,000,000 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively
    86,528       75,000  
Additional paid in capital
    9,085,015       2,060,417  
Stock subscription
    (527,211 )     (434,507 )
    Accumulated deficit
    (6,144,675 )     (2,707,619 )
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    2,499,657       (1,006,709 )
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 4,392,359     $ 262,903  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
2
 

 


ECHO AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
   
Period from Inception
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
   
(November 25, 2009)
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2013
   
2012
   
to September 30, 2013
 
                               
Revenue
  $ 2,500     $     $ 3,100     $ 6,100     $ 133,456  
Operating expenses:
                                       
General and administrative
    1,394,449       823,622       3,285,713       1,476,725       5,948,908  
Selling and marketing
    17,162       5,345       28,775       7,388       110,465  
Total operating expenses
    1,411,611       3,314,488       3,314,488       1,484,113       6,059,373  
Operating loss
    (1,409,111 )     (828,967 )     (3,311,388 )     (1,478,013 )     (5,925,917 )
                                         
Other expense
                                       
Interest expense
    68,130       21,218       125,668       43,696       218,758  
Total other expense
    68,130       21,218       125,668       43,696       218,758  
                                         
Loss before taxes
    (1,477,241 )     (850,185 )     (3,437,056 )     (1,521,709 )     (6,144,675 )
                                         
Income tax provision
                             
                                         
Net loss
  $ (1,477,241 )   $ (850,185 )   $ (3,437,056 )   $ (1,521,709 )   $ (6,144,675 )
                                         
Net loss per share
                                       
Basic and diluted
  $ (0.02 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.04 )   $ (0.05 )        
                                         
Weighted average common shares outstanding
                                       
Basic and diluted
    81,227,959       33,974,746       77,959,605       28,688,507          
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
3
 

 

 
ECHO AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
(unaudited)
 
    Common Stock   Additional Paid   Stock   Accumulated 
    Shares    Amount   In Capital   Subscriptions   Deficit    Total 
                               
Balance at November 25, 2009      $   $   $   $   $ 
                               
Member contributions   800,288    800    2,524    —      —      3,324 
                               
Net loss                   (5,555)   (5,555)
                               
Balance at December 31, 2009   800,288    800    2,524    —      (5,555)   (2,231)
                               
Member contributions   10,810,148    10,810    34,090            44,900 
                               
Member withdrawls   (722,282)   (722)   (2,278)           (3,000)
                               
Net loss                   (38,600)   (38,600)
                               
                               
Balance at December 31, 2010   10,888,154    10,888    34,336    —      (44,155)   1,069.00 
                               
Member contributions   15,128,188    15,128    47,707            62,835 
                               
Net loss                   (300,542)   (300,542)
                               
Balance at December 31, 2011   26,016,342    26,016    82,043    —      (344,697)   (236,638)
                               
Member contributions   26,483,658    26,484    83,516            110,000 
                               
Common stock of Canterbury   22,500,000    22,500    1,777,532            1,800,032 
                               
Stock subscriptions assumed in the merger               (434,507)       (434,507)
                               
Extinguishment of related party payable           91,761            91,761 
                               
Issuance of warrants           25,565    —      —      25,565 
                               
Net loss                   (2,362,922)   (2,362,922)
                               
Balance at December 31, 2012   75,000,000    75,000    2,060,417    (434,507)   (2,707,619)   (1,006,709)
                               
Financing agreements   5,000,000    5,000    495,000            500,000 
                               
Recognition of share issued in exchange for assets acquired   6,527,778    6,528    4,402,417            4,408,945 
                               
Stock subscription receivable             1,500,000    (1,500,000)         
                               
Receipt of funds on stock subscriptions               1,407,296        1,407,296 
                               
Recognition of contingent beneficial conversion feature and warrants           538,871            538,871 
                               
Shares to be issued for services           88,310            88,310 
                               
Net loss                   (3,437,056)   (3,437,056)
                               
Balance at September 30, 2013   86,527,778   $86,528   $9,085,015   $(527,211)  $(6,144,675)  $2,499,657 
 
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
4
 

 

 
ECHO AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
 
               
Period from Inception
 
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
   
(November 25, 2009)
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
to September 30, 2013
 
                   
Cash flows from operating activities:
                 
Net loss
  $ (3,437,056 )   $ (1,521,709 )   $ (6,144,675 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    280,451       24,369       324,192  
Accretion of debt discount
    48,812             65,163  
    Shares issuable for services rendered     88,310             88,310  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Accounts receivable
                   
Other current assets
    (15,373 )     (46,827 )     (74,400 )
Accounts payable
    (57,287 )     74,151       142,959  
Accounts payable - related party
    27,073             27,073  
Bank overdraft
    (37,616 )            
Accrued liabilities
    130,376       225,649       319,826  
Related party advance
    26,603             126,603  
Net cash used in operating activities
    (2,945,707 )     (1,244,367 )     (5,124,949 )
                         
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Purchases of intangibles
          (50,000 )     (50,000 )
Purchases of property and equipment
    (216,863 )     (140,538 )    

 

(412,601

)
Net cash used in investing activities
    (216,863 )     (190,538 )     (462,601 )
                         
Cash flows from financing activities
                       
Proceeds from stock subscriptions
    1,407,296       903,000       2,875,096  
Proceeds from notes payable
    1,030,000       523,000       1,913,000  
Principal repayments on notes payable
    (31,000 )     (12,000 )     (63,000 )
Proceeds from financing agreement
    500,000             500,000  
Proceeds from shares issuable in exchange for assets acquired
    500,000             500,000  
Advances from Company officers
                159,250  
Repayments to Company officers on advances
                (159,250 )
Capital withdrawals
                (3,000 )
Capital contributions
                111,059  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    3,406,296       1,414,000       5,833,155  
                         
Increase (decrease) in cash
    243,726       (20,905 )     245,605  
Cash, beginning of period
    1,879       101,359        
Cash, end of period
  $ 245,605     $ 80,454     $ 245,605  
                         
Supplemental cash flow information
                       
                         
Shares issuable in exchange for assets acquired
  $ 4,402,417     $     $ 4,402,417  
Extinguishment of related party payable
  $     $     $ 91,761  
Debt extinguished with issuance of company stock
  $     $ 110,000     $ 110,000  
                         
Recognition of contingent beneficial conversion feature and warrants
  $ 538,871     $     $ 564,436  
Extinguishment of related party payable with stock subscription
  $     $     $ 97,693  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
5
 

 

 
ECHO AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1 – Description of Business
 
Canterbury Resources, Inc. (“Canterbury”) was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 2, 2008. Canterbury’s initial business plan was to acquire and explore mineral properties.
 
Exchange Agreement
 
On September 21, 2012 Echo Automotive LLC (“Echo”) and DBPJ Stock Holding, LLC, sole member of Echo (the “Echo Member”) entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Canterbury. The Exchange Agreement resulted in the Echo Member receiving a total of 52,500,000 shares of common stock of Canterbury in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding units of Echo. In accordance with the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the shares received by the Echo Member represented 70% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Canterbury at the time of the Exchange Agreement. As part of the exchange, Canterbury changed its name to Echo Automotive, Inc.
 
Operations
 
Echo Automotive, Inc. (the Company) is developing a set of technologies that it believes will reduce overall fuel expenses in commercial fleet vehicles by augmenting existing powertrains with highly efficient electrical energy delivered by electric motors powered by Echo’s modular plug-in battery modules. Echo believes this technology will achieve an immediate return on investment for each individual vehicle in a fleet.
 
The Company’s operations have previously been funded by advances and subsequent equity conversions by the majority stockholders. Future funding is expected to be provided in part by equity investments from other accredited investors. There can be no assurance that any of these strategies will be achieved on terms attractive to us.
 
Note 2 – Basis of Presentation
 
As a result of the Exchange Agreement, Canterbury merged with Echo, with Echo being the accounting acquirer thus resulting in a reverse merger. Therefore the accompanying financial statements are on a consolidated basis subsequent to September 21, 2012, but only reflect the operations of Echo prior to September 21, 2012.
 
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The accounting policies are described in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” in the 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated, as necessary, in this Form 10-Q. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data presented for comparative purposes was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year or for any other subsequent interim period.
 
The Company is a development stage company and has incurred significant losses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and for the period from inception (November 25, 2009) through September 30, 2013 and has experienced negative cash flows from operations since inception. These circumstances result in substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern as noted in Note 11.
 
6
 

 

 
Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Echo Automotive, LLC and Advanced Technical Asset Holdings, LLC, beginning with their respective dates of acquisition. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
 
Fair Value
 
Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC (“ASC 820-10”), fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. When determining fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact, and it considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
 
The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
 
Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2. Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), inputs that are other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability or market corroborated inputs.
 
Level 3. Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of assets or liabilities, which may include internal data or valuation data received from the security issuer.
 
The Company’s financial instruments include cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, related party advances, and notes payable. The carrying value of these instruments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The Company used inputs that would qualify as Level 2 inputs to make its assessment of the approximate fair value of the notes payable.
 
Note 4: Balance Sheet Information
 
Balance sheet information is as follows:
 
   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Property and equipment, net:
           
Office equipment/computer
  $ 108,967     $ 18,863  
Prototype Vehicles
    615,945       95,669  
Equipment and tools
    199,415       81,206  
    $ 924,327     $ 195,738  
Less: Accumulated depreciation
    (165,867 )     (41,241 )
    $ 758,460     $ 154,497  
                 
   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
     2013      2012  
Intangible assets, net:
               
Intangible assets
  $ 3,474,719     $ 52,500  
Less:  Accumulated amortization
    (160,825 )     (5,000 )
    $ 3,313,894     $ 47,500  
                 
   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
     2013      2012  
Accrued liabilities:
               
Accrued expenses
  $ 191,703     $ 112,711  
Accrued interest
    153,123       76,739  
    $ 344,826     $ 189,450  
 
7
 

 

 
Note 5: Asset Acquisition
 
Bright Automotive, Inc. (“Bright”) was established in 2008 as an offspring of the non-profit Rocky Mountain Institute to commercialize and develop the IDEA plug-in hybrid electric fleet vehicle. Bright ceased operations in March 2012 after failing to obtain a loan through the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program. The Company successfully hired key members of the Bright team and acquired certain facilities and intellectual property in a bid to accelerate EchoDrive™’s commercialization in spring of 2012. In the first quarter of 2013, Bright’s assets, including all of its intellectual properties and patents, were auctioned off and were purchased by Advanced Technical Asset Holdings, LLC (“ATAH”), a company wholly owned by a shareholder and debt holder of the Company, for a total purchase price of $500,000, comprised of $250,000 of cash and $250,000 of promissory notes. As part of the asset acquisition between Bright and ATAH, Bright is due 277,778 shares of the Company’s common stock within 12 months of the date of the execution of the agreement. Additionally, $25,000 and 27,778 shares of the Company’s common stock were due within 90 days of the execution of the agreement for the satisfactory transfer of the intellectual property and all the rights and privileges associated with the intellectual property. The $25,000 and a combined fair value of $326,945 for the 305,556 shares that ATAH is obligated to issue to Bright as of the acquisition date pursuant to the agreement were recorded as a liability by ATAH. The value of the shares was based on the market price of the stock as of the acquisition date.
 
On April 5, 2013 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding units of ATAH for 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The value of the shares exchanged for units of ATAH was approximately $3,120,000, which was based on the market price of the stock as of the acquisition date. As part of an exchange agreement with ATAH, the Company assumed all of the assets and liabilities described above, $100,000 cash, and a promissory note for $400,000. As of September 30, 2013, the promissory note was paid and the Company received $400,000. The $25,000 and the 27,778 shares of the Company’s common stock were not paid to Bright as of September 30, 2013. The Company has allocated the fair value of the shares exchanged based on the relative fair value of the assets that qualify for allocation. The Company has not yet issued the shares of common stock related to this transaction and has recorded such an obligation in equity. The Company determined that this transaction met the business scope exception thus asset acquisition accounting was used instead of business combination accounting.
 
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities assumed:
 
         
Estimated
 
   
Purchase
   
Useful Life
 
Asset
 
Price
   
(years)
 
             
Patents
  $ 2,460,219       14  
Cash
    500,000       N/A  
Show Auto (Vehicles)
    492,044       5  
Computer Equipment
    19,682       3  
Obligation to pay cash to Bright
    (25,000 )     N/A  
Obligation to issue shares to Bright
    (326,945 )     N/A  
Net assets
  $ 3,120,000          
 
License Agreement
 
On April 5, 2013 the Company entered into an amendment with CleanFutures (the “Amendment”) to the License Agreement dated February 1, 2012 (the “License Agreement”). The Amendment resulted from the mutual agreement with CleanFutures that the original intent of the License Agreement was not being met or adhered to. In accordance with the Amendment, the Company will issue 1,850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to CleanFutures; in turn, the Company will receive certain rights, including perpetual use of the CleanFutures Patent and future patent(s), a non-compete agreement in which CleanFutures will not be permitted to do business with any of the Company’s competitors, and CleanFutures has agreed to certain covenants that will assure that CleanFutures will for perpetuity not interfere with the Company’s business. This Amendment superseded the existing License Agreement. The Company has not yet issued the shares of common stock related to this agreement. The fair value of the shares was $962,000 on April 5, 2013 based on stock price of $0.52 on that date and was allocated among the assets based on their relative fair values. Any assets described below that was not assigned a purchase price was considered not to have value as contemplated by the terms of the agreement. The amounts purchased were capitalized based on the market price of the stock.
 
8
 

 

 
The following table summarizes the assets acquired:
 
Intangible Asset Acquired
 
Purchase Price
   
Estimated
Useful Life
(years)
 
             
License Agreement
  $ 962,000       7  
 
The amortization expense relating to these acquisitions was $78,290 and $152,075 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
 
Note 6: Related Party Transactions
 
Shareholders of the Company made advances of $26,603 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for working capital purposes. The advances are due on demand, non-interest bearing, and classified within related party advances in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013.
 
The Company paid consulting fees to certain shareholders and directors of the Company that amounted to $100,512 and $243,012 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $45,604 and $95,317 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The Company paid consulting fees to certain shareholders and directors of the Company that amounted to $905,068 for the period from inception (November 25, 2009) through September 30, 2013.
 
The Company incurred interest expense with related parties of $4,498 and $13,411 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The Company incurred interest expense with related parties of $6,760 and $8,529 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Total interest expense with related parties for the period from inception (November 25, 2009) through September 30, 2013 was $37,647. The Company has accrued interest on related party notes payable of $37,647 and $24,236 recorded within accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
 
The shareholder associated with the $2,000,000 financing agreement discussed within Note 8 overpaid the Company $16,559 when making the final payment on the stock subscription in January 2013. Additionally, this shareholder paid for $10,514 of legal expenses on behalf of the Company. The total of these two transactions, $27,073, is included within accounts payable – related party in the accompanying balance sheet as of September 30, 2013.
 
Note 7: Debt
 
On May 20, 2013, the Company entered into a financing and security agreement and a secured convertible subordinated promissory note with United Fleet Financing LLC “UFF” of which the sole member is a related party and also the owner of ATAH. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this agreement, UFF has agreed to provide the Company $1,500,000 of financing for working capital. The financing will be provided to the Company in nine scheduled installments beginning June 15, 2013 and ending January 1, 2014, starting with a first installment of $166,000. Each installment payment has a term of 5 years from first installment of funding. Pursuant to the agreement UFF has the option to convert any amounts paid to the Company pursuant to the financing agreement, into common stock at a conversion price of $0.55 per share and receive up to 2,727,272 warrants, each to purchase 1.25 shares of common stock at a per share exercise price of $0.65 with a term of 18 months.
 
On August 1, 2013, the Company amended the $1.5 million financing and security agreement dated May 20, 2013 to change the payment schedule such that all payments are received by December 31, 2013.
 
As of September 30, 2013 the Company has received $830,000 in cash related to this agreement and issued 1,886,364 warrants as discussed in Note 9. A debt discount of $301,206 was recorded to reflect a beneficial conversion feature and warrants associated with the cash received. The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense until maturity or its earlier repayment or conversion. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has not issued any shares of its common stock related to this agreement.
 
On June 20, 2013, the Company entered into a financing and security agreement and secured a convertible promissory note (the “Emerald Note”) in the amount of $200,000 with Emerald Private Equity Fund, LLC (“Emerald”). Pursuant to the terms of the Emerald Note, Emerald agreed to provide the Company with $200,000 upon execution. In connection with this financing, Emerald received a warrant to purchase 714,286 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share, exercisable over a five year term. The Emerald Note has a maturity date of five years and bears interest at 8% annually. The unpaid outstanding balance on the Emerald Note may be converted at the option of either party at a rate of two shares of the Company’s restricted common stock for each $0.70.
 
9
 

 

 
As of September 30, 2013, the Company has received $200,000 in cash related to this agreement and issued 714,286 warrants as discussed in Note 9.  A debt discount of $200,000 was recorded to reflect a beneficial conversion feature and warrants associated with the cash received.  The debt discount is being amortized to interest expense until maturity or its earlier repayment or conversion.  As of September 30, 2013, the Company has not issued any shares of its common stock related to this agreement.
 
Note 8: Equity
 
$2,000,000 Financing Agreement
 
In May 2012, the Company entered into a financing agreement to raise up to $2,000,000 through the sale of shares of its common stock at $0.50 per share and warrants to purchase one share of common stock of the Company with an exercise price of $0.75 per share, no vesting requirement and a term of 18 months. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had received all of the $2,000,000 and issued 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  See Note 9 for discussion on the issuance of the related warrants.
 
$500,000 Financing Agreement
 
During February and March 2013, the Company received gross proceeds of $500,000 from a private placement of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price equal to the lower (i) of $0.75 per share or (ii) the preceding 10 day volume-weighted volume average price per share of Company stock prior to the exercise date, no vesting requirement and a term of 18 months pursuant to a financing agreement with Newmarket Traders LTD.
 
As of September 30, 2013 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares related to this agreement. See Note 9 for discussion on the issuance of the related warrants.
 
$1,500,000 Securities Agreement
 
On May 16, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with UFF pursuant to which UFF agreed to provide $1,500,000 of funding to the Company for working capital in exchange for the issuance of 2,727,273 units at a price of $0.55 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 1.25 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.65 per share, exercisable over five years. The $1,500,000 received was recorded as stock subscription receivable.
 
As of September 30, 2013 the Company has received $972,789 in cash related to this agreement and issued 2,210,884 warrants as discussed in Note 9. As of September 30, 2013 the Company has not issued any shares of its common stock related to this agreement.
 
On July 3, 2013, as part of an equity agreement, the Company filed with the Securities Exchange Commission a Form S-1 for the registration of its Common Stock, $.001 par value.  The number of shares to be registered is 11,288,094.
  
On October 15, 2013, Rod McKinley resigned as the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. On September 19, 2013, as part of his resignation from the Company as its Chief Financial Officer, the Company agreed to issue 353,241 shares of common stock to him as severance. The shares were to be delivered upon his resignation. The shares were valued using the closing price of the Company’s stock on September 19, 2013, which was $0.25. The total value of the shares of $88,310 and was recorded as an expense during the three months ending September 30, 2013. The shares were delivered to him in October 2013.
  
Note 9: Warrants
 
As discussed in Note 8, the Company issued warrants during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The following summarizes the warrant activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
 
   
Number of Units
   
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in
years)
   
Intrinsic value
 
                         
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
    342,000     $ 0.01              
    Grants     9,879,036       0.70              
Outstanding at September 30, 2013
    10,221,036     $ 0.67       2.2     $ 102,375  
                                 
Exercisable at September 30, 2013
    10,221,036     $ 0.67       2.2     $ 102,375  
 
10
 

 

 
The weighted-average grant date fair value for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 equaled $0.91 per share.
 
On January 30, 2013, the Company issued 4,000,000 warrants to Hartford Equity, Inc. in conjunction with the $2,000,000 Financing Agreement discussed within Note 8. The grant-date fair value of these warrants was $914,388, which was calculated based on a pro-rata allocation of the grant-date fair value of the stock and warrants related to the $2,000,000 Financing Agreement to the proceeds received of $2,000,000.
 
During February and March 2013, the Company issued a total of 1,000,000 warrants to Newmarket Traders LTD as discussed within Note 8. The grant-date fair value of these warrants was $224,298; which was calculated based on a pro-rata allocation of the grant-date fair value of the stock and warrants related to the $500,000 Financing Agreement to the proceeds received of $500,000.
 
In July, 2013, the Company issued a total of 714,286 warrants at an exercise price of $0.65 per share, and exercisable over a five year term relating to a $200,000 financing and security agreement and secured a convertible promissory note dated June 20, 2013 discussed in Note 7. The grant date fair value of the warrants issued was $249,638.  A debt discount of $200,000 was recorded to reflect a beneficial conversion feature and warrants associated with the cash received, of which $9,205 was accreted to interest expense.
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 3,000 and 19,500 warrants to a related party lender and third party lender, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 the Company issued 9,000 and 58,500 warrants to a related party lender and third party lender, respectively. The issuances were related to outstanding notes payable agreements with warrant features stating that for every $10 outstanding at the end of each calendar month the Company will issue the lender one warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at no more than $0.01 per share with no vesting requirement and a term of five years. The grant-date fair value of these warrants was $6,150 and $37,725, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, which was recorded as a debt discount. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, $1,354 and $11,847 of this debt discount was accreted to interest expense, respectively.
 
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 1,833,611 and 2,210,884 warrants, respectively, relating to a $1.5 million securities purchase agreement with UFF entered into on May 16, 2013. The issuances were related to proceeds received of $806,789 and $972,789 for the three and nine months ended September 2013, respectively.  Pursuant to the agreement, the Company receives cash in exchange for the issuance of 2,727,273 units at a price of $0.55 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 1.25 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.65 per share, exercisable over five years. The grant date fair value of the warrants issued for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $442,994 and $531,031, respectively, which was calculated on a pro-rata allocation of the grant date fair value of the stock and warrants related to the $1.5 million securities agreement.
 
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 1,509,091 and 1,886,364 warrants, respectively, relating to a $1.5 million financing and security agreement and a secured convertible subordinated promissory note with UFF entered into on May 20, 2013.  The issuances were related to proceeds received of $664,000 and $830,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The grant date fair value of the warrants issued for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $298,041 and $411,599, respectively, of which $205,582 and $301,206, was allocated as a debt discount and beneficial conversion for the three and nine months ended September 2013, respectively.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, $10,488 and $11,285, of this debt discount was accreted to interest expense, respectively.
 
The warrants issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following range of assumptions:
 
 Black-Scholes Pricing Model Assumptions
 
Exercise price
 
$0.01 - $0.75
 
Stock price
 
$0.26 - $1.37
 
Volatility
 
153.81% - 205.42
Risk-free interest rate
 
0.20% - 1.78
Expected Term
 
1.5 - 5 years
 
 
Note 10: Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share
 
Net loss per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the assumed exercise of exercisable warrants and conversion of convertible notes payable are anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss and are excluded from the determination of net loss per common share – diluted. Accordingly, net loss per common share – diluted equals net loss per common share – basic in all periods presented.
 
11
 

 

 
The following table summarizes the potential shares of common stock that were excluded from diluted net loss per share, because the effect of including these potential shares was antidilutive:

   
September 30,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
             
Convertible notes payable
    3,735,044       1,175,953  
Warrants
    10,221,036       314,285  
 
Note 11: Going Concern
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company had a net loss of $1,477,241 and $3,437,056, respectively, as compared to a net loss of $850,185 and $1,521,709 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.  Additionally, the Company has incurred a net loss of $6,144,675 for the period from inception (November 25, 2009) to September 30, 2013.  As of September 30, 2013, the Company had not emerged from the development stage. These circumstances result in substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to begin operations and achieve a level of profitability. The Company intends to finance operations by issuing additional common stock, warrants and through bridge financing. The failure to achieve the necessary levels of profitability and obtain the additional funding would be detrimental to the Company. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
Note 12:  Commitments and Contingencies
 
Litigation
 
The Company may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.
 
Note Payable Default and Dispute
 
On August 16, 2013, the Company received notice of a lawsuit filed in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada filed by Portofino Investments II Limited Partnership (“Portofino”) against the Company regarding a convertible loan in the principal amount of $100,000.  The lawsuit alleges that the Company has failed to repay the loan amount and interest that were due to Portofino under the convertible loan and that Portofino is entitled to judgment in the full amount due under such convertible loan, in addition to costs and expenses relating to the cause of action.   The Company filed an answer to the complaint and an early case conference is scheduled for November 12, 2013.
 
Former Service Provider Dispute
 
A former service provider of the Company has asserted various claims regarding the Company relating to activities that took place during 2012 and 2013.  The Company has concluded an independent investigation, performed by a third party legal firm, into the merit of these claims and determined that they were either without merit or immaterial.  The Company does not believe that any amounts that may potentially be paid as a result of any of these claims would have a material effect on its financial statements.
 
Note 13: Subsequent Events
 
On October 15, 2013, Rod McKinley resigned as the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company.  As part of his resignation, Mr. McKinley received 353,241 shares of common stock as severance.
 
On October 15, 2013, the Board appointed Todd Lawson as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company with an effective start date of October 28, 2013.  Pursuant to a written agreement, Mr. Lawson will receive a base salary of $170,000 per annum along with performance based bonus compensation, and an option to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the strike price of $0.26 per share. The options vest quarterly over a four year period with an initial vesting of 100,000 shares, 43,750 shares for each of quarters 1-12, and 93,750 shares for each of quarters 13-16. All of the options expire on August 14, 2023.
 
12
 

 

 
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Reference is made in particular to the description of our plans and objectives for future operations, assumptions underlying such plans and objectives, and other forward-looking statements included in this report.  Such statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms.  Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.  Such statements address future events and conditions concerning, among others, capital expenditures, earnings, litigation, regulatory matters, liquidity and capital resources, and accounting matters.  Actual results in each case could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements by reason of factors such as future economic conditions, changes in consumer demand, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments in markets in which we operate, results of litigation, and other circumstances affecting anticipated revenues and costs, and the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 16, 2013.
 
As used in this Form 10-Q, “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Echo Automotive, Inc., which is also sometimes referred to as the “Company.”
 
You Should Not Place Undue Reliance on These Forward-Looking Statements
 
The forward-looking statements made in this report on Form 10-Q relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this report on Form 10-Q.  Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.  You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report, including documents referenced by incorporation, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect or hope.
 
Overview
 
We were organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 2, 2008 under the name Canterbury Resources, Inc. On August 27, 2012 we effected a stock dividend of four shares of common stock of the Company for each share of common stock issued and outstanding. Effective September 24, 2012, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to change our name from “Canterbury Resources, Inc.” to “Echo Automotive, Inc.”
 
On October 11, 2012 we closed a voluntary exchange transaction (the “Exchange” or “Exchange Transaction”) with Echo Automotive, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (“Echo LLC”) and DBPJ Stock Holding, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company and sole member of Echo (the “Echo LLC Member”) pursuant to an Exchange Agreement dated September 21, 2012 (the “Exchange Agreement”) by and among the Company, Echo LLC, and the Echo LLC Member. As a result of the Exchange, the Echo LLC Member acquired 70% of our issued and outstanding common stock, Echo LLC became our sole wholly-owned subsidiary, and we acquired the business and operations of Echo LLC.
 
Through Echo LLC, we are now a development stage company with several technologies and methods that allow commercial fleet vehicles to significantly reduce their overall fuel expenses. Our business plan is based on providing the marketplace with a business proposition for reducing the use of fossil fuels by augmenting power trains within existing commercial fleet vehicles with highly efficient electrical assist delivered through electric motors powered by our modular plug-in batteries to achieve rapid real-world operating results including a rapid return on the investment for such amended vehicles.
 
Bright Automotive, Inc. was established in 2008 as an offspring of the non-profit Rocky Mountain Institute to commercialize and develop the IDEA plug-in hybrid electric fleet vehicle. Bright Automotive ceased operations in March 2012 after failing to obtain a loan through the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program. We successfully hired key members of the Bright Automotive team and acquired certain facilities and intellectual property in a bid to accelerate EchoDriveTM’s commercialization in spring of 2012. In the first quarter of 2013, Bright Automotive, Inc.’s assets, including all of its intellectual properties and patents, were auctioned off and were purchased by Advanced Technical Asset Holdings, LLC (“ATAH”). On April 5, 2013, we acquired ATAH for 6,000,000 shares of our common stock as part of an exchange agreement with ATAH in which we received full ownership of the assets described above (“ATAH Exchange”). We plan to use the intellectual property and patents to develop additional electrification solutions for the marketplace.
 
13
 

 


As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have generated minimal revenue and we do not generate adequate cash flows to support our existing operations. Moreover, the historical and existing capital structure is not adequate to fund our planned growth. Our operations to date have been funded by advances, private “family and friends” capital contributions, equity financings, and subsequent equity conversions by the majority stockholders. Our working and growth capital is dependent on more significant future funding expected to be provided in part by equity investments from other accredited investors including institutional investors. Future cash flows are subject to a number of variables, including the level of production, economic conditions and maintaining cost controls. There can be no assurance that operations and other capital resources will provide cash in sufficient amounts to maintain planned or future levels of capital expenditures. 
 
Results of Operations
 
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
Revenues
 
We are in the research and development phase and currently have no customers.  We had $2,500 and $3,100, respectively of revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and $0 and $6,100 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. This revenue is attributable to the sales of carbon credits and consulting services.
 
General and Administrative Expenses
 
    General and Administrative Expenses
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
Change
 
                   
Three Months Ended September 30,
  $ 1,394,449     $ 823,622     $ 570,827  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  $ 3,285,713     $ 1,476,725     $ 1,808,988  
 
General and administrative expenses increased for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 due to increases in payroll expenses of approximately $23,000, increases in rent expense of approximately $71,000, increases in legal expense of approximately $86,000 and increases in other expenses of approximately $524,000, offset by a decrease in consulting expenses of approximately $133.000.
 
General and administrative expenses increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due to increases in payroll expenses of approximately $679,000, legal expenses of approximately $258,000, rent expense of approximately $148,000, and other expenses of approximately $847,000, offset by a decrease in consulting expenses of approximately $123,000.
 
Selling and Marketing Expenses
 
       Selling and Marketing Expenses  
      2013       2012    
Change
 
                         
Three Months Ended September 30,
  $ 17,162     $ 5,345     $ 11,817  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  $ 28,775     $ 7,388     $ 21,387  
 
Selling and marketing expenses increased in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 due to significant sales, marketing and public relations efforts including, but not limited to, a major industry tradeshow, news releases providing business updates to the marketplace, marketing collateral for customer meetings, and sales calls which required the shipping of the Echo demonstration vehicle.
 
14
 

 


Operating Loss
 
    Operating Loss
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
Change
 
                   
Three Months Ended September 30,
  $ (1,409,111 )   $ (828,967 )   $ (580,144 )
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  $ (3,311,388 )   $ (1,478,013 )   $ (1,833,375 )
 
The increase in our operating loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 is due to the increase in general and administrative expenses and selling and marketing expenses, each of which is described above.
 
Total Other Expense
 
     Total Other Expense  
   
2013
   
2012
   
Change
 
                   
Three Months Ended September 30,
  $ 68,130     $ 21,218     $ 46,912  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  $ 125,668     $ 43,696     $ 81,972  
 
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the increase in other expense is entirely comprised of interest expense on our various debt, which has increased during the same period.
 
Net Loss
 
     Net Loss  
   
2013
   
2012
   
Change
 
                   
Three Months Ended September 30,
  $ (1,477,241 )   $ (850,185 )   $ (627,056 )
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  $ (3,437,056 )   $ (1,521,709 )   $ (1,915,347 )

Changes in net loss are attributable to our changes in operating loss and other expense, each of which we have described above.
 
From Inception (November 25, 2009) to September 30, 2013
 
We have generated $133,456 of revenue since inception (November 25, 2009).   We are in the research and development phase and currently have no customers.  Revenue from inception to September 30, 2013 is attributable to the sales of carbon credits and consulting services.  We have incurred $6,059,373 of operating expenses from inception through September 30, 2013.  These expenses are comprised of $5,948,908 of general and administrative expenses and $110,465 of selling and marketing expenses.  The general and administrative expenses consist of payroll, consulting, legal, rent, and miscellaneous expenses.  We also incurred $218,758 of interest expense.  Our net loss from inception through September 30, 2013 is $6,144,675.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Net cash used in operating activities was $2,945,707 and $1,244,367 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The increase is mainly attributable to increases in net loss of approximately $1,915,347 and settlement of the bank overdraft of approximately $38,000, partially offset by non-cash depreciation, amortization, and accretion of debt discount of approximately $304,894.
 
As of September 30, 2013, we had cash on hand of $245,605 and negative working capital of $1,023,413. We believe that our cash on hand and working capital will not be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next 12 months.  To date, our working capital has been a combination of private investments, private loans, stockholder capital contributions, and advances through promissory notes.
 
Cash used in investing activities was $216,863 and $190,538 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In 2013, this amount consisted of purchases of property and equipment.  In 2012, this amount consisted of purchases of property and equipment of $140,538 and purchases of intangibles of $50,000.
 
15
 

 


Cash provided by financing activities was $3,406,296 and $1,414,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we received cash from stock subscriptions in the amount of $1,407,296, proceeds from notes payable of $1,030,000, proceeds from a financing agreement of $500,000, proceeds from shares issuable in exchange for assets acquired of $500,000 and made repayments on debt of $31,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we received cash from stock subscriptions in the amount of $903,000, proceeds from notes payable of $523,000 and repayments on debt of $12,000.
 
We had negative working capital of $1,023,413 as of September 30, 2013 compared to $626,920 as of December 31, 2012. Our cash position increased to $245,605 at September 30, 2013 compared to $1,879 at December 31, 2012, for the reasons described above.
 
As of September 30, 2013, we have outstanding notes payable totaling $1,740,000, of which $710,000, excluding the debt discount, is classified as short-term. Interest expense incurred on all debt, excluding the expense related to the accretion of the debt discount, was $78,286 and $43,696 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
 
In May 2012, we entered into a financing agreement to raise up to $2,000,000 through the sale of shares of our common stock at $0.50 per share and warrants to purchase one share of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share and a term of 18 months. As of September 30, 2013 we received the entire $2,000,000 under this private placement and issued the related shares and warrants.
 
In February and March 2013, we entered into a financing agreement to raise $500,000 through the sale of shares of our common stock at $0.50 per share and warrants to purchase one share of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share and a term of 18 months.  As of September 30, 2013 we received the entire $500,000 under this private placement and issued the related shares and warrants.
 
On May 16, 2013, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with United Fleet Financing LLC “UFF” of which the sole member is a related party. Pursuant to the agreement, UFF agreed to provide $1,500,000 of funding for working capital in exchange for the issuance of 2,727,273 units at a price of $0.55 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 1.25 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.65 per share, exercisable over five years. As of September 30, 2013 we received $972,789 under this private placement and issued 2,210,884 warrants. As of September 30, 2013 the Company has not issued any shares of its common stock related to this agreement.
 
On May 20, 2013, we entered into a financing and security agreement and a secured convertible subordinated promissory note with UFF.  Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this agreement, UFF has agreed to provide us $1,500,000 of financing for working capital. The financing will be provided to us in nine scheduled installments beginning June 15, 2013 and ending January 1, 2014, starting with a first installment of $166,000.  Pursuant to the agreement UFF has the option to convert any amounts paid to the Company pursuant to the financing agreement, into common stock at a conversion price of $0.55 per share and receive up to 2,727,272 warrants, each to purchase 1.25 shares of  common stock at a per share exercise price of $0.65 with a term of 18 months.  As of September 30, 2013 we received $830,000 under this private placement and issued 1,886,364 warrants.  As of September 30, 2013 the Company has not issued any shares of its common stock related to this agreement.
 
On June 20, 2013, we entered into a financing and security agreement and a secured convertible promissory note (the “Emerald Note”) in the amount of $200,000 with Emerald Private Equity Fund, LLC (“Emerald”). Pursuant to the terms of the Emerald Note, Emerald agreed to provide us with $200,000 upon execution. In connection with this financing, Emerald received a warrant to purchase 714,286 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share, exercisable over a five (5) year term. The Emerald Note has a maturity date of five (5) years and bears interest at eight percent (8%) annually. The unpaid outstanding balance on the Emerald Note may be converted at the option of either party a rate of two (2) shares of our restricted common stock for each $0.70.  As of September 30, 2013 we received $200,000 under this private placement and issued the related warrants. As of September 30, 2013 the Company has not issued any shares of its common stock related to this agreement.
 
We are currently seeking both short-term funding to finance current operations as well as significant amounts of long term capital to execute our business plan. We project that in order to execute our business plan and proceed to full production, approximately $3.0 million in short term funding will be required over the next four months and $5.5 million in the first half of 2014.  Our base monthly expenses total approximately $250,000. The additional working capital needs are related to hiring additional personnel, purchase of electric motors, battery cells, and costs related to selling and marketing efforts.
 
Our current cash requirements are significant due to planned development and marketing of our current products, and we anticipate generating losses. In order to execute on our business strategy, we will require additional working capital commensurate with the operational needs of planned marketing, development and production efforts. We anticipate that we will be able to raise sufficient amounts of working capital through debt or equity offerings as may be required to meet short-term obligations. However, changes in operating plans, increased expenses, acquisitions, or other events, may cause us to seek additional equity or debt financing in the future. We expect to incur additional marketing, development and production expenses. Accordingly, we expect to continue to use debt and equity financing to fund operations for the foreseeable future as we look to expand our asset base and fund marketing, development and production of the EchoDrive™ product.
 
16
 

 

 
We generated minimal revenue and are in the developmental stage and therefore we do not internally generate adequate cash flows to support our existing operations. Moreover, the historical and existing capital structure is not adequate to fund our planned growth. We intend to finance our operations by issuing additional common stock, warrants and through bridge financing. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in procuring the financing we are seeking. Future cash flows are subject to a number of variables, including the level of production, economic conditions and maintaining cost controls. There can be no assurance that operations and other capital resources will provide cash in sufficient amounts to maintain planned or future levels of capital expenditures.
 
To meet future objectives, we will need to meet revenue targets and sell additional equity and debt securities, which most likely will result in dilution to current stockholders. Future cash flows are subject to a number of variables, including the level of production, economic conditions and maintaining cost controls. There can be no assurance that operations and other capital resources will provide cash in sufficient amounts to maintain planned or future levels of capital expenditures.
 
We may also seek additional loans where the incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could require the Company to agree to operating and financial covenants that would restrict our operations. Financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure by us to raise additional funds on terms favorable to us, or at all, could limit our ability to expand business operations and could harm our overall business prospects. In addition, we cannot be assured of profitability in the future.
 
Considering we have yet to emerge from the development stage, we do not generate adequate cash flows to support our existing operations, our reliance on capital from investors, the potential need to seek additional loans to meet future objectives, and other factors, we believe there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to begin operations and achieve a level of profitability. The Company intends to finance our operations by issuing additional common stock, warrants and through bridge financing. The failure to achieve the necessary levels of profitability and obtain the additional funding would be detrimental to the Company.
  
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
None.
 
Significant Accounting Policies
 
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are incorporated by reference herein.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
We have implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and we do not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet effective that might have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to provide Part I, Item 3 disclosure.
 
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (who is our Principal Executive Officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (who is our Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of the design of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2013, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2013 in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) rules and forms. This conclusion is based on findings that constituted material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
 
17
 

 

 
In performing the above-referenced assessment, our management identified the following material weaknesses:
 
i)
 
We have insufficient quantity of dedicated resources and experienced personnel involved in reviewing and designing internal controls. As a result, a material misstatement of the interim and annual financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
     
ii)
 
We do not have an audit committee. While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the management’s view that to have an audit committee, comprised of independent board members, is an important entity-level control over our financial statements.
     
iii)
 
We did not perform an entity level risk assessment to evaluate the implication of relevant risks on financial reporting, including the impact of potential fraud-related risks and the risks related to non-routine transactions, if any, on our internal control over financial reporting. Lack of an entity-level risk assessment constituted an internal control design deficiency which resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material error would not have been prevented or detected, and constituted a material weakness.
     
iv)
 
Historically, we have lacked personnel with formal training to properly analyze and record complex transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
     
v)
 
We have not achieved the optimal level of segregation of duties relative to key financial reporting functions.
     
vi)
 
Our computer controls are weak due to lack of IT personnel and protocol infrastructure.
 
Our management feels the weaknesses identified above have not had any material effect on our financial results. However, the Company has taken steps to mitigate this risk, by hiring a Chief Financial Officer who is a CPA and who has experience in systems integration and building accounting systems infrastructure in his past.  Additionally, most currently we have retained an external CPA firm to assist in the analysis of certain accounting matters and in the preparation of the Company’s quarterly filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Additionally, we are currently reviewing our disclosure controls and procedures related to these material weaknesses and expect to implement changes in the near term, including identifying specific areas within our governance, accounting and financial reporting processes to add adequate resources to potentially mitigate these material weaknesses. Our management team will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and is committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
 
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within any company have been detected.
 
18
 

 

 
 
 
On August 16, 2013, the Company received notice of a lawsuit filed in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada filed by Portofino Investments II Limited Partnership (“Portofino”) against the Company regarding a convertible loan in the principal amount of $100,000.  The lawsuit alleges that the Company has failed to repay the loan amount and interest that were due to Portofino under the convertible loan and that Portofino is entitled to judgment in the full amount due under such convertible loan, in addition to costs and expenses relating to the cause of action.   The Company filed an answer to the complaint and an early case conference is scheduled for November 12, 2013.
 
 
There have been no material updates to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
 
 
There are no sales of our securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, that were not previously disclosed in an Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
 
 
None.
 
 
None.
 
 
None.
 
19
 

 

 
 
Exhibit Number
 
Description
     
3.1(a)
 
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 20, 2009).
     
3.1(b)
 
Text of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on Sept. 27, 2012).
     
3.2
 
Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 20, 2009)
     
10.1
 
     
31.1
 
     
31.2
 
     
32.1
 
     
32.2
 
     
101
 
Interactive Data File**
 
* Filed herewith.
** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.
 
20
 

 

 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
Echo Automotive, Inc.
   
     
/s/ Todd Lawson
   
Todd Lawson
   
Chief Financial Officer
   
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
     
Dated:  November 14, 2013
   
 
21