10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____________________ TO __________________

Commission file number 000-1449794

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	26-3339011
(State of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Hundred Gateway Drive, Suite 100 Bethlehem, PA	18017
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(610) 882-8800

(Issuer’s Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 or the Exchange Act.)  Yes o  No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes o  No o                                                       Not applicable.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

COMMON STOCK
Number of shares outstanding as of November 10, 2011	($1.00 Par Value)	7,171,198
	(Title Class)	(Outstanding Shares)

Table of Contents

Part I – Financial Information	3
Item 1 – Financial Statements	3
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	3
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures	31
Part II - Other Information	32
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	32
Item 1A - Risk Factors	32
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities	33
Item 4 – Removed and Reserved	33
Item 5 - Other Information	33
Item 6 - Exhibits	33
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32

2

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Part I – Financial Information

Item 1 – Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2011			2010
	(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
Cash and due from banks	$	14,875		$	6,645
Interest bearing demand deposits with banks		7,018			7,085
Federal funds sold		1,193			5,913
Cash and Cash Equivalents		23,086			19,643
Interest bearing time deposits		7,635			8,326
Securities available for sale		88,626			89,871
Restricted investment in bank stock		1,725			2,006
Loans receivable, net of allwance for loan losses of $4,104 in 2011; $3,709 in 2010		407,722			384,456
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		2,080			2,398
Accrued interest receivable		1,618			1,503
Other real estate owned		3,069			3,069
Other assets		1,744			2,612
Total Assets	$	537,305		$	513,884
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	35,780		$	32,431
Interest bearing		412,903			382,836
Total Deposits		448,683			415,267
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		29,774			46,433
Long-term borrowings		13,286			13,586
Accrued interest payable		652			941
Other liabilities		2,447			928
Total Liabilities		494,842			477,155
Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $1 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; 2011 issued 7,171,551 shares; outstanding 7,171,198 shares; 2010 issued 7,157,357 shares; outstanding 7,157,004 shares		7,171			7,157
Surplus		22,872			22,303
Retained earnings		10,469			6,976
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,954			296
Treasury stock, at cost, 353 shares		(3	)		(3	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		42,463			36,729
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	537,305		$	513,884

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
INTEREST INCOME	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Loans receivable, including fees	$	5,378	$	5,193	$	15,532	$	15,236
Securities, taxable		379		584		1,280		1,736
Securities, non-taxable		285		251		781		700
Federal funds sold, and other		6		7		21		22
Interest on time deposits		29		32		90		105
Total Interest Income		6,077		6,067		17,704		17,799
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		1,010		1,170		3,035		3,727
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		38		92		136		314
Long-term borrowings		186		187		556		578
Total Interest Expense		1,234		1,449		3,727		4,619
Net Interest Income		4,843		4,618		13,977		13,180
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		238		350		541		833
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		4,605		4,268		13,436		12,347
OTHER INCOME
Credit card processing fees		243		196		702		566
Other service fees		109		102		318		276
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities		487		-		487		-
Total Other Income		839		298		1,507		842
OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		1,369		1,251		4,136		3,707
Occupancy and equipment		532		562		1,626		1,603
Data processing		231		196		738		634
Credit card processing		231		184		674		532
Advertising and promotion		233		203		650		554
Professional fees		123		90		294		282
Loan department		43		54		137		115
Charitable contributions		95		79		306		265
Other		467		329		1,160		1,066
Total Other Expenses		3,324		2,948		9,721		8,758
Income before Income Taxes		2,120		1,618		5,222		4,431
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		637		467		1,514		1,286
Net Income	$	1,483	$	1,151	$	3,708	$	3,145
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	0.21	$	0.17	$	0.52	$	0.45
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	0.21	$	0.16	$	0.51	$	0.43
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE	$	-	$	-	$	0.03	$	0.02

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

	Common Stock			Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock			Total
	(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2009	$	6,941		$	22,900		$	2,455		$	1,384	$	(3	)	$	33,677
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-			-			3,145			-		-			3,145
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of income tax effects		-			-			-			976		-			976
Total Comprehensive Income																4,121
Dividend declared, $0.02 per share								(141	)							(141	)
Exercise of stock options, 294,075 shares		294			543			-			-		-			837
Stock tendered for funding exercise of stock options and tax expense, 179,666 shares		(180	)		(808	)		-			-		-			(988	)
BALANCE - SEPTEMBER 30, 2010	$	7,055		$	22,635		$	5,459		$	2,360	$	(3	)	$	37,506
BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2010	$	7,157		$	22,303		$	6,976		$	296	$	(3	)	$	36,729
Comprehensive income:
Net income		-			-			3,708			-		-			3,708
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment and income tax effects		-			-			-			1,658		-			1,658
Total Comprehensive Income																5,366
Dividend declared, $0.03 per share								(215	)							(215	)
Exercise of stock options, 34,119 shares		34			80			-			-		-			114
Stock tendered for funding exercise of stock options and tax expense, 19,925 shares		(20	)		(113	)		-			-		-			(133	)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised					602											602
BALANCE - SEPTEMBER 30, 2011	$	7,171		$	22,872		$	10,469		$	1,954	$	(3	)	$	42,463

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	3,708		$	3,145
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		541			833
Accretion of deferred loan costs		(22	)		(71	)
Depreciation and amortization		470			458
Net amortization of investment security premiums and discounts		254			87
Net realized gain on sale of securities		(487	)		-
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(115	)		(170	)
Increase in other assets		15			344
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(289	)		(379	)
Increase in other liabilities		1,519			562
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		5,594			4,809
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of securities available for sale		(11,572	)		(32,420	)
Sales of securities available for sale		6,592			-
Maturities, calls and principal repayments of securities available for sale		8,969			13,016
Net increase in loans		(23,785	)		(32,844	)
Redemption of restricted investment in bank stock		281			-
Net maturities of interest bearing time deposits		691			2,513
Purchases of premises and equipment		(152	)		(500	)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(18,976	)		(50,235	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		33,416			30,241
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		(16,659	)		15,786
Payment of long-term borrowed funds		(300	)		(3,430	)
Net payment of stock tendered		(19	)		(151	)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		602			-
Dividends paid		(215	)		(141	)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		16,825			42,305
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		3,443			(3,121	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING		19,643			26,464
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - ENDING	$	23,086		$	23,343
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	4,016		$	4,998
Income taxes paid	$	500		$	1,286

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Embassy Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Pennsylvania corporation organized in 2008 and registered as a bank holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”). The Company was formed for purposes of acquiring Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley (the “Bank”) in connection with the reorganization of the Bank into a bank holding company structure, which was consummated on November 11, 2008. Accordingly, the Company owns all of the capital stock of the Bank, giving the organization more flexibility in meeting its capital needs as the Company continues to grow. Embassy Holdings, LLC (the “LLC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank organized to engage in the holding of property acquired by the Bank in satisfaction of debts previously contracted.  As such, the consolidated financial statements contained herein include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and the LLC. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Bank, which is the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, was originally incorporated as a Pennsylvania bank on May 11, 2001 and opened its doors on November 6, 2001. It was formed by a group of local business persons and professionals with significant prior experience in community banking in the Lehigh Valley area of Pennsylvania, the Bank’s primary market area.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

The consolidated financial statements presented in this report should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2011.

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluated the events and transactions that occurred after September 30, 2011 through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Certain amounts in the 2010 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on 2010 net income.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies of the Company as applied in the interim financial statements presented are substantially the same as those followed on an annual basis as presented in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Note 3 – Stockholders’ Equity

On November 11, 2008, the Company consummated its acquisition of Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley pursuant to a Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 18, 2008, pursuant to which the Bank was reorganized into a bank holding company structure. At the effective time of the reorganization, each share of common stock of Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley issued and outstanding was automatically converted into one share of Company common stock. The issuance of Company common stock in connection with the reorganization was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

7

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 4 – Comprehensive Income

The only other comprehensive income item that the Company presently has is unrealized gains on securities available for sale. The components of the change in unrealized gains for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(In thousands)
Change in unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale	$	750		$	1,151		$	2,998		$	1,478
Less: Reclassification adjustment for realized gains (losses)		(487	)		-			(487	)		-
		263			1,151			2,511			1,478
Tax effect		(90	)		(391	)		(853	)		(502	)
Change in net unrealized gains	$	173		$	760		$	1,658		$	976

Note 5 – Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, as adjusted for stock dividends and splits. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustments to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(Dollars In Thousands, except per share data)
Net income	$	1,483	$	1,151	$	3,708	$	3,145
Weighted average shares outstanding		7,167		6,972		7,162		6,971
Dilutive effect of potential common shares, stock options		34		190		40		267
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		7,201		7,162		7,202		7,238
Basic earnings per share	$	0.21	$	0.17	$	0.52	$	0.45
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.21	$	0.16	$	0.51	$	0.43

Stock options of 72,439 and 72,739 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because they are not dilutive to earnings.

Note 6 – Guarantees

The Company, through the Bank, does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank generally holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Company had $­4.6 million of standby letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2011. The approximate value of underlying collateral upon liquidation that would be expected to cover this maximum potential exposure was $4.4 million. Management does not consider the current amount of the liability as of September 30, 2011 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued to be material.

8

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 7 – Short-term and Long-term Borrowings

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) short term advances generally represent overnight or less than twelve month borrowings. Long term advances from the FHLB are for proceeds of twelve months or more and are generally less than sixty months. The Bank has an agreement with the FHLB which allows for borrowings up to a percentage of qualifying assets. At September 30, 2011, the Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity for short-term and long-term advances of approximately $190.6 million, of which $7.9 million were outstanding in long-term loans. Long-term loans with FHLB of $7.9 million were outstanding at December 31, 2010. There were no short-term advances outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. All FHLB borrowings are secured by qualifying assets of the Bank.

The Bank has a federal funds line of credit with the Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (“ACBB”) of approximately $6.0 million, of which none was outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Advances from this line are unsecured.

The Company has two lines of credit with Univest National Bank and Trust Company (“Univest”) totaling $10 million. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance was $5.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively. Advances from these lines of credit are secured by 833,333 shares of Bank common stock. Under the terms of the loan agreement, the Bank is required to remain well capitalized. The proceeds of the loan were primarily used for the holding company’s investment in the Bank, thus providing additional capital to support the Bank’s growth.

Note 8 – Securities Available For Sale

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, the amortized cost and fair values of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2011
U.S Government and agency obligations	$	31,457	$	341	$	-		$	31,798
Municipal bonds		37,424		1,856		(1	)		39,279
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		12,268		707		-			12,975
Corporate bonds		4,517		116		(59	)		4,574
Total	$	85,666	$	3,020	$	(60	)	$	88,626
December 31, 2010:
U.S Government and agency obligations	$	32,669	$	120	$	(167	)	$	32,622
Municipal bonds		37,012		102		(568	)		36,546
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		15,961		815		(27	)		16,749
Corporate bonds		3,780		174		-			3,954
Total	$	89,422	$	1,211	$	(762	)	$	89,871

9

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 8 – Securities Available For Sale (Continued)

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of September 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without any penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	5,304	$	5,363
Due after one year through five years		32,749		33,186
Due after five years through ten years		6,696		7,031
Due after ten years		28,649		30,071
		73,398		75,651
Mortgage-backed securities		12,268		12,975
	$	85,666	$	88,626

Proceeds from the sales of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $7 million, with gross gains of $487 thousand.  The proceeds were used, in part, to purchase tax-free securities. There were no sales of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Securities with a carrying value of $44.0 and $58.2 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were subject to agreements to repurchase, pledged to secure public deposits, or pledged for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The following table shows the Company’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2011:	(In Thousands)
Municipal bonds	$	770	$	(1	)	$	-	$	-	$	770	$	(1	)
Corporate Bonds		1,936		(59	)		-		-		1,936		(59	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	2,706	$	(60	)	$	-	$	-	$	2,706	$	(60	)
December 31, 2010:
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations	$	27,455	$	(167	)	$	-	$	-	$	27,455	$	(167	)
Municipal bonds		27,880		(568	)		-		-		27,880		(568	)
Mortgage -backed securities - residential		1,584		(27	)		-		-		1,584		(27	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	56,919	$	(762	)	$	-	$	-	$	56,919	$	(762	)

The Company had three (3) securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011. The unrealized losses are due only to interest rate fluctuations. As of September 30, 2011, the Company either has the intent and ability to hold the securities until maturity or market price recovery, or believes that it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell such securities. Management believes that the unrealized loss only represents temporary impairment of the securities.

10

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 9 – Restricted Investment In Bank Stock

Restricted investments in bank stock consist of Federal Home Loan Bank stock (“FHLB”) and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock.  The restricted stocks are carried at cost.

The Bank owns restricted stock investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock according to a predetermined formula.  In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock and as of September 30, 2011 has not resumed dividend payments. During 2011 and 2010, FHLB of Pittsburgh conducted a limited excess capital stock repurchase based upon positive net income results. In connection with this program, the Bank had stock at a carrying value of $281 thousand repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to no repurchases during the same period in 2010.  Any future capital stock repurchases are expected to be made on a quarterly basis if conditions warrant such repurchases.

Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment. Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.

Based upon its evaluation of the foregoing criteria, management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB stock as of September 30, 2011.

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality

The following table presents the composition of loans receivable at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Balance			Percentage of Total Loans			Balance			Percentage of Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	170,837			41.46	%	$	166,780			42.95	%
Commercial construction		15,118			3.67	%		15,701			4.04	%
Commercial		26,846			6.52	%		27,591			7.11	%
Residential real estate		196,048			47.59	%		176,141			45.37	%
Consumer		3,137			0.76	%		2,048			0.53	%
Gross loans		411,986			100.00	%		388,261			100.00	%
Unearned origination (fees) costs		(160	)					(96	)
Allowance for loan losses		(4,104	)					(3,709	)
	$	407,722					$	384,456

11

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality (Continued)

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention (potential weakness identified), substandard (well defined weakness) and doubtful (unlikely to be paid in full) within the Company's internal risk rating system as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

September 30, 2011:	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	165,766	$	946	$	4,016	$	109	$	170,837
Commercial construction		11,144		-		3,974		-		15,118
Commercial		26,518		253		75		-		26,846
Residential real estate		195,569		123		-		356		196,048
Consumer		3,137		-		-		-		3,137
Total	$	402,134	$	1,322	$	8,065	$	465	$	411,986
December 31, 2010:
Commercial real estate	$	159,513	$	601	$	6,407	$	259	$	166,780
Commercial construction		15,576		125		-		-		15,701
Commercial		27,023		229		339		-		27,591
Residential real estate		175,635		125		-		381		176,141
Consumer		2,048		-		-		-		2,048
Total	$	379,795	$	1,080	$	6,746	$	640	$	388,261

12

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality (Continued)

The following table summarizes information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

September 30, 2011:	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	4,975	$	5,025			$	5,125	$	154
Commercial construction		3,974		3,974				3,155		117
Commercial		328		377				426		11
Residential real estate		479		604				480		5
Consumer		-		-				-		-
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	$	96	$	96	$	11	$	96	$	3
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		-
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total:
Commercial real estate	$	5,071	$	5,121	$	11	$	5,221	$	157
Commercial construction		3,974		3,974		-		3,155		117
Commercial		328		377		-		426		11
Residential real estate		479		604		-		480		5
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
	$	9,852	$	10,076	$	11	$	9,283	$	290
December 31, 2010:
With no related allowance recorded:	$	7,108	$	7,108			$	5,825	$	84
Commercial real estate		125		125				31		-
Commercial construction		568		568				479		4
Commercial		506		506				369		4
Residential real estate		-		-				-		-
Consumer
With an allowance recorded:	$	159	$	159	$	15	$	40	$	4
Commercial real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		-
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer
Total:	$	7,267	$	7,267	$	15	$	5,865	$	88
Commercial real estate		125		125		-		31		-
Commercial construction		568		568		-		479		4
Commercial		506		506		-		369		4
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer	$	8,466	$	8,466	$	15	$	6,744	$	96

13

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality (Continued)

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	1,066	$	1,140
Commercial construction		-		-
Commercial		-		-
Residential real estate		356		381
Consumer		-		-
Total	$	1,422	$	1,521

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due.  The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

September 30, 2011:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Loans Receivable >90 Days and Accruing
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	1,680	$	3,314	$	1,924	$	6,918	$	163,919	$	170,837	$	857
Commercial construction		1,061		-		-		1,061		14,057		15,118		-
Commercial		493		62		-		555		26,291		26,846		-
Residential real estate		-		-		356		356		195,692		196,048		-
Consumer		-		-		7		7		3,130		3,137		-
Total	$	3,234	$	3,376	$	2,287	$	8,897	$	403,089	$	411,986	$	857
December 31, 2010:
Commercial real estate	$	2,272	$	579	$	2,604	$	5,455	$	161,325	$	166,780	$	1,464
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-		15,701		15,701		-
Commercial		-		20		-		20		27,571		27,591		-
Residential real estate		-		104		381		485		175,656		176,141		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-		2,048		2,048		-
Total	$	2,272	$	703	$	2,985	$	5,960	$	382,301	$	388,261	$	1,464

14

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality (Continued)

The following table summarizes information in regards to the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans receivable at September 30, 2011 and the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended:

	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial Construction			Commercial			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
	(In Thousands)
Allowance for credit losses
Three months ending:
Beginning Balance - June 30, 2011	$	1,384		$	340		$	309		$	1,413		$	53		$	413		$	3,912
Charge-offs		(50	)		-			-			-			-			-			(50	)
Recoveries		-			-			-			-			4			-			4
Provisions		(40	)		54			98			72			(12	)		66			238
Ending balance - September 30, 2011	$	1,294		$	394		$	407		$	1,485		$	45		$	479		$	4,104
Nine months ending:
Beginning Balance - December 31, 2010	$	1,014		$	443		$	325		$	1,309		$	35		$	583		$	3,709
Charge-offs		(137	)		-			(1	)		(25	)		-			-			(163	)
Recoveries		1			-			4			-			12			-			17
Provisions		416			(49	)		79			201			(2	)		(104	)		541
Ending balance - September 30, 2011	$	1,294		$	394		$	407		$	1,485		$	45		$	479		$	4,104
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	11		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	11
Ending balance: collectively evaluted for impairment	$	1,283		$	394		$	407		$	1,485		$	45		$	478		$	4,093
Loans receivables:
Ending balance	$	170,837		$	15,118		$	26,846		$	196,048		$	3,137					$	411,986
Ending balance: individually evaluted  for impairment	$	5,071		$	3,974		$	328		$	479		$	-					$	9,852
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	165,766		$	11,144		$	26,518		$	195,569		$	3,137					$	402,134

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company may grant a concession or modification for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial condition than it would not otherwise consider, resulting in a modified loan which is then identified as troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).  The Company may modify loans through rate reductions, extensions to maturity, interest only payments, or payment modifications to better coincide the timing of payments due under the modified terms with the expected timing of cash flows from the borrowers’ operations.  Loan modifications are intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral.  TDRs are considered impaired loans for purposes of calculating the Company’s allowance for loan losses.

The Company identifies loans for potential restructure primarily through direct communication with the borrower and the evaluation of the borrower’s financial statements, revenue projections, tax returns, and credit reports.  Even if the borrower is not presently in default, management will consider the likelihood that cash flow shortages, adverse economic conditions, and negative trends may result in a payment default in the near future.

The Company adopted the amendments in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02 during the current period ended September 30, 2011. As required, the Company reassessed all restructurings that occurred on or after the beginning of the current fiscal year (January 1, 2011) for identification as TDRs. The Company did not identify any additional TDR receivables for which the allowance for credit losses had previously been measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology.

15

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality (Continued)

The following table presents TDRs outstanding as of September 30, 2011:

	September 30, 2011
	Accrual Loans		Non-Accrual Loans		Total Modifications
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	2,191	$	711	$	2,902
Commercial construction		2,808		-		2,808
Commercial		214		-		214
Residential real estate		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-
	$	5,213	$	711	$	5,924

As of September 30, 2011, no available commitments were outstanding on TDRs.

The following tables present newly restructured loans that occurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively:

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Three months ended September 30, 2011:	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial real estate		-	$	-	$	-
Commercial construction		1		350		350
		1	$	350	$	350

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Nine months ended September 30, 2011:	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial real estate		1	$	11	$	11
Commercial construction		4		2,808		2,808
		5	$	2,819	$	2,819

The TDRs described above did not require an impairment reserve recorded in the allowance for loan losses for the three and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011.  One commercial construction loan was a new loan to pay off the remaining balance of a prior TDR where term, rate and payment were modified in the amount of $350 thousand.  Three commercial construction loans had term modifications totaling $2.5 million; the remaining loan was a new commercial real estate loan to pay taxes on an existing TDR loan in the amount of $11 thousand.

16

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality (Continued)

The following tables represent financing receivables modified as TDRs with payment defaults, with the payment defaults occurring within 12 months of the restructure date, and the payment default occurring during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively:

	September 30, 2011
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate		-	$	-		4	$	1,309
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-
		-	$	-		4	$	1,309

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASC, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The recent fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

ASC Topic 860 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 860 are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

17

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are as follows:

Description	(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs		(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total
	(In Thousands)
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	-	$	31,798	$	-	$	31,798
Municipal Bonds		-		39,279		-		39,279
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		-		12,975		-		12,975
Corporate bonds		-		4,574		-		4,574
September 30, 2011 Securities available for sale	$	-	$	88,626	$	-	$	88,626
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	-	$	32,622	$	-	$	32,622
Municipal Bonds		-		36,546		-		36,546
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		-		16,749		-		16,749
Corporate bonds		-		3,954		-		3,954
December 31, 2010 Securities available for sale	$	-	$	89,871	$	-	$	89,871

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are as follows:

Description	(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs		(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2011 Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	85	$	85
September 30, 2011 Other real estate owned	$	-	$	-	$	3,069	$	3,069
December 31, 2010 Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	144	$	144
December 31, 2010 Other real estate owned	$	-	$	-	$	3,069	$	3,069

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.

Interest Bearing Time Deposits (Carried at Cost)

Fair values for fixed-rate time certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.

18

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Securities Available for Sale (Carried at Fair Value)

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) are determined by matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.  The measurement of fair value should be consistent with one of the following valuation techniques: market approach, income approach, and/or cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). For example, valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables. Multiples might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable. The selection of where within the range the appropriate multiple falls requires judgment, considering factors specific to the measurement (qualitative and quantitative). Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include matrix pricing.

Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost)

The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, and projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

Impaired Loans (Generally Carried at Fair Value)

Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under existing FASB guidance, in which the Bank has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

At September 30, 2011, of the impaired loans having an aggregate balance of $9.8 million, $9.7 million did not require a valuation allowance because the value of the collateral securing the loan was determined to meet or exceed the balance owed on the loan. Of the remaining $96 thousand in impaired loans, an aggregate valuation allowance of $11 thousand was required to reflect what was determined to be a shortfall in the value of the collateral as compared to the balance on such loans.

Restricted Investment in Bank Stock (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost)

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Federal Funds Purchased (Carried at Cost)

These borrowings are short term and the carrying amount approximates the fair value.

Long-Term Borrowings (Carried at Cost)

Fair values of FHLB and Univest advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB and Univest advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

19

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (Disclosed at Cost)

Fair values for the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
	(In Thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,086	$	23,086	$	19,643	$	19,643
Interest bearing time deposits		7,635		7,643		8,326		8,434
Securities available-for-sale		88,626		88,626		89,871		89,871
Loans receivable, net of allowance		407,722		416,033		384,456		388,794
Restricted investment in bank stock		1,725		1,725		2,006		2,006
Accrued interest receivable		1,618		1,618		1,503		1,503
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		448,683		449,451		415,267		416,508
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		29,774		29,776		46,433		46,435
Long-term borrowings		13,286		13,674		13,586		14,006
Accrued interest payable		652		652		941		941
Off-balance sheet finanacial instruments:
Commitments to grant loans		-		-		-		-
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit		-		-		-		-
Standby letters of credit		-		-		-		-

Note 12 – New Accounting Standards

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring to clarify the accounting principles applied to loan modifications, as defined by FASB ASC Subtopic 310-40, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The Update clarifies guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether or not a concession has been granted, with an emphasis on evaluating all aspects of the modification rather than a focus on specific criteria, such as the effective interest rate test, to determine a concession. The Update goes on to provide guidance on specific types of modifications, such as changes in the interest rate of the borrowing and insignificant delays in payments, as well as guidance on the creditor’s evaluation of whether or not a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. For public entities, the amendments in the Update are effective for the first interim or annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The entity should also disclose information required by ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which had previously been deferred by ASU 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company adopted the guidance for the period ended September 30, 2011 with no impact on the Company’s financial conditions or operations.

20

Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 12 – New Accounting Standards (Continued)

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This update amends FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, to bring U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements in line with International Accounting Standards. The Update clarifies existing guidance for items such as: the application of the highest and best use concept to non-financial assets and liabilities; the application of fair value measurement to financial instruments classified in a reporting entity’s stockholder’s equity; and disclosure requirements regarding quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of level 3 assets. The Update also creates an exception to Topic 820 for entities which carry financial instruments within a portfolio or group, under which the entity is now permitted to base the price used for fair valuation upon a price that would be received to sell the net asset position or transfer a net liability position in an orderly transaction. The Update also allows for the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement if the financial instrument is categorized in level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Lastly, the ASU contains new disclosure requirements regarding fair value amounts categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy such as: disclosure of the valuation process used; effects of and relationships between unobservable inputs; usage of nonfinancial assets for purposes other than their highest and best use when that is the basis of the disclosed fair value; and categorization by level of items disclosed at fair value, but not measured at fair value for financial statement purposes. For public entities, this Update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will impact its financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.  The provisions of this update amend FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to facilitate the continued alignment of U.S. GAAP with International Accounting Standards. The Update prohibits the presentation of the components of comprehensive income in the statement of stockholder’s equity. Reporting entities are allowed to present either: a statement of comprehensive income, which reports both net income and other comprehensive income; or separate statements of net income and other comprehensive income. Under previous GAAP, all 3 presentations were acceptable. Regardless of the presentation selected, the Reporting Entity is required to present all reclassifications between other comprehensive and net income on the face of the new statement or statements. The provisions of this Update are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2011 for public entities.  As the two remaining options for presentation existed prior to the issuance of this Update, early adoption is permitted.

21

 Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion and analysis provides an overview of the financial condition and results of operations of Embassy Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2011 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the preceding consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, as well as with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Current performance does not guarantee and may not be indicative of similar performance in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies

Disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Some of these policies are particularly sensitive, requiring significant judgments, estimates and assumptions to be made by management, most particularly in connection with determining the provision for loan losses and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Additional information is contained in this Form 10-Q under the paragraphs titled “Provision for Loan Losses,” “Credit Risk and Loan Quality,” and “Income Taxes” contained on the following pages.

Forward-looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements, including statements of goals, intentions, and expectations as to future trends, plans, events or results of Company operations and policies and regarding general economic conditions. These forward-looking statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These statements are based upon current and anticipated economic conditions, nationally and in the Company’s market, interest rates and interest rate policy, competitive factors and other conditions that, by their nature, are not susceptible to accurate forecast, and are subject to significant uncertainty.

Such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “intends”, “will”, “should”, “anticipates”, or the negative of any of the foregoing or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussion of strategy.

No assurance can be given that the future results covered by forward-looking statements will be achieved. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could impact the Company’s operating results include, but are not limited to, (i) the effects of changing economic conditions in the Company’s market areas and nationally, (ii) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer and other lending activities, (iii) significant changes in interest rates, (iv) changes in federal and state banking laws and regulations which could impact the Company’s operations, and (iv) other external developments which could materially affect the Company’s business and operations.

OVERVIEW

The Company is a Pennsylvania corporation organized in 2008 and registered as a bank holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act). The Company was formed for purposes of acquiring Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley (the “Bank”) in connection with the reorganization of the Bank into a bank holding company structure, which was consummated on November 11, 2008. Accordingly, the Company owns all of the capital stock of the Bank, giving the organization more flexibility in meeting its capital needs as the Company continues to grow. Embassy Holdings, LLC (the “LLC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank organized to engage in the holding of property acquired by the Bank in satisfaction of debts previously contracted.  As such, the consolidated financial statements contained herein include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and the LLC.

The Bank, which is the Company’s primary operating subsidiary, was originally incorporated as a Pennsylvania bank on May 11, 2001 and opened its doors on November 6, 2001. It was formed by a group of local business persons and professionals with significant prior experience in community banking in the Lehigh Valley area of Pennsylvania, the Bank’s primary market area.

The Company’s assets grew $23.4 million from $513.9 million at December 31, 2010 to $537.3 million at September 30, 2011 due to the increase in cash and cash equivalents and loans, which were offset slightly by a decrease in interest bearing time deposits and a decrease in the securities portfolio.

Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.5 million compared to a net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 of $1.2 million.  Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $3.7 million compared to a net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $3.1 million.  Loans receivable, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased $23.2 million to $407.7 million at September 30, 2011 from $384.5 million at December 31, 2010. The market is very competitive and the Company is committed to maintaining a high quality portfolio that returns a reasonable market rate. The Company expects to increase lending activity, as the Company expands its presence in its market and becomes more widely known.  The past and current economic conditions have created lower demand for loans by credit-worthy customers, making the expected growth in lending activity more challenging.  The lending staff has been active in contacting new prospects and promoting the Company’s name in the community. Management believes that this will translate into continued growth of a portfolio of quality loans, although there can be no assurance of this.

22

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Income

Total interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased slightly by $10 thousand to $6.1 million, as compared to $6.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, due to the increase in average earning assets offset by a decrease in the yield on earning assets.  Average earning assets were $513.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $493.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets was 4.82% for the third quarter of 2011 compared to 4.99% for the third quarter of 2010.

Total interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 decreased $215 thousand to $1.2 million as compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to decreases in deposit rates and the mix of deposits, as the Bank has become less reliant on higher cost certificate of deposits. Average interest bearing liabilities were $449.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $439.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  The yield on average interest bearing liabilities was 1.09% for the third quarter of 2011 compared to 1.31% for the third quarter of 2010. This decrease was the result of market conditions, deposit mix, competition, and management’s resulting adjustments to the interest rates provided to depositors.

Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $4.8 million compared to $4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The improvement in net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 is a result of decreases in the interest expense associated with deposits and other borrowed funds, offset to a lesser extent by a reduction in rates received on interest earning assets. The Company’s net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased five (5) basis points to 3.87% as compared to 3.82% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, due to the current interest rate environment, including the decreased cost of deposits and borrowed funds offset by the competitive interest rate pressure of lending.

Total interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 decreased $96 thousand to $17.7 million, as compared to $17.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due to the increase in average earning assets offset by a decrease in the yield on earning assets.  Average earning assets were $505.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $473.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets was 4.80% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 5.12% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Total interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 decreased $892 thousand to $3.7 million as compared to $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to decreases in deposit rates and the mix of deposits, as the Bank has become less reliant on higher cost certificate of deposits. Average interest bearing liabilities were $448.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $424.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The yield on average interest bearing liabilities was 1.12% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 1.46% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This decrease was the result of market conditions, deposit mix, competition, and management’s resulting adjustments to the interest rates provided to depositors.

Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $14.0 million compared to $13.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The improvement in net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is a result of decreases in the interest expense associated with deposits and other borrowed funds, offset to a lesser extent by a reduction in rates received on interest earning assets. The Company’s net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 decreased one (1) basis point to 3.81% as compared to 3.82% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due to the current interest rate environment, including the decreased cost of deposits and borrowed funds offset by the competitive interest rate pressure of lending.

23

Below are tables which set forth average balances and corresponding yields for the corresponding three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively:

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

Interest Rates and Interest Differential (quarter to date)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance			Interest		Tax Equivalent Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Tax Equivalent Yield
	(Dollars In Thousands)
ASSETS
Loans - taxable	$	399,592		$	5,342		5.30	%	$	377,818		$	5,186		5.45	%
Loans - non-taxable		3,594			36		5.90	%		693			7		5.95	%
Investment securities - taxable		60,835			379		2.49	%		63,662			584		3.67	%
Investment securities - non-taxable		29,422			285		5.79	%		25,851			251		5.81	%
Federal funds sold		1,198			-		0.00	%		6,128			2		0.13	%
Time deposits		7,535			29		1.53	%		7,982			32		1.59	%
Interest bearing deposits with banks		11,427			6		0.21	%		10,944			5		0.18	%
TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS		513,603			6,077		4.82	%		493,078			6,067		4.99	%
Less allowance for loan losses		(3,985	)							(3,994	)
Other assets		23,257								19,897
TOTAL ASSETS	$	532,875							$	508,981
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits, NOW and money market	$	40,033		$	18		0.18	%	$	34,486		$	34		0.39	%
Savings		283,122			670		0.94	%		228,686			584		1.01	%
Certificates of deposit		78,757			322		1.62	%		120,927			552		1.81	%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and long-term borrowings		47,473			224		1.87	%		55,419			279		2.00	%
TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES		449,385			1,234		1.09	%		439,518			1,449		1.31	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		35,155								28,106
Other liabilities		4,015								1,877
Stockholders' equity		44,320								39,480
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	532,875							$	508,981
Net interest income				$	4,843							$	4,618
Net interest spread							3.73	%							3.68	%
Net interest margin							3.87	%							3.82	%

24

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

Interest Rates and Interest Differential (year to date)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance			Interest		Tax Equivalent Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Tax Equivalent Yield
	(Dollars In Thousands)
ASSETS
Loans - taxable	$	388,441		$	15,442		5.32	%	$	366,553		$	15,228		5.55	%
Loans - non-taxable		3,054			90		5.85	%		305			8		5.17	%
Investment securities - taxable		63,852			1,280		2.68	%		58,265			1,736		3.97	%
Investment securities - non-taxable		27,166			781		5.75	%		23,827			700		5.85	%
Federal funds sold		3,464			3		0.12	%		6,019			7		0.16	%
Time deposits		7,643			90		1.57	%		8,328			105		1.69	%
Interest bearing deposits with banks		11,814			18		0.20	%		10,401			15		0.19	%
TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS		505,434			17,704		4.80	%		473,698			17,799		5.12	%
Less allowance for loan losses		(3,861	)							(3,823	)
Other assets		22,961								18,915
TOTAL ASSETS	$	524,534							$	488,790
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits, NOW and money market	$	39,192		$	64		0.22	%	$	33,395		$	129		0.52	%
Savings		268,466			1,883		0.94	%		218,152			1,868		1.14	%
Certificates of deposit		87,631			1,088		1.66	%		120,605			1,730		1.92	%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and long-term borrowings		52,708			692		1.76	%		52,087			892		2.29	%
TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES		447,997			3,727		1.12	%		424,239			4,619		1.46	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		32,299								25,235
Other liabilities		3,212								2,150
Stockholders' equity		41,026								37,166
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	524,534							$	488,790
Net interest income				$	13,977							$	13,180
Net interest spread							3.68	%							3.66	%
Net interest margin							3.81	%							3.82	%

Provision for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered by management to be adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.

25

The allowance consists of general, specific, qualitative and unallocated components. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.  The specific component relates to loans that are classified as watch, other assets especially mentioned, substandard, doubtful or loss. For such loans they may also be classified as impaired or restructured.  For loans that are further classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and home equity loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement or there is a possible loss expected.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, management has provisioned for loan losses of $238 thousand and $541 thousand, respectively, as compared to $350 thousand and $833 thousand, respectively, for the same period ended September 30, 2010.  In the first nine months of 2011, interest in the amount of $32 thousand was charged off on three loans when the loans were placed on non-accrual.  Principal in the amount of $131 thousand was charged off on four loans, while principal in the amount of $17 thousand was recovered on four loans.  The allowance for loan losses is $4.1 million as of September 30, 2011, which is 1.00% of outstanding loans, compared to $4.0 million or 1.04% of outstanding loans as of September 30, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses of $3.7 million represented 0.96% of total outstanding loans. Based principally on economic conditions, asset quality, and loan-loss experience, including that of comparable institutions in the Bank’s market area, the allowance is believed to be adequate to absorb any losses inherent in the portfolio. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate, or that material increases will not be necessary should the quality of the loans deteriorate.  The Bank has not participated in any sub-prime lending activity.

The activity in the allowance for loan losses is shown in the following table, as well as period end loans receivable and the allowance for loan losses as a percent of the total loan portfolio:

	September 30,
	2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Total loans receivable at end of period	$	411,826		$	382,363
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning	$	3,709		$	3,598
Provision for loan losses		541			833
Loans charged off		(163	)		(474	)
Recoveries		17			4
Balance at end of period	$	4,104		$	3,961
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable at end of period		1.00	%		1.04	%

26

Non-interest Income

Total non-interest income was $839 thousand for the three month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to $298 thousand for the same period in 2010.  Total non-interest income was $1.5 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to $842 thousand for the same period in 2010. The increase is primarily due to the growth in the Bank’s credit card and merchant processing customer base and a gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities.

Non-interest Expense

Non-interest expenses increased $376 thousand or 13% from $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $3.3 million for the same period ended September 30, 2011. The increase is due to: an increase of $118 thousand in salary and employee benefits, the majority of which are in conjunction with increased branch staffing and salary adjustments; an increase of $47 thousand in credit card expense due to an increase in volume; an increase of $30 thousand in advertising; an increase of $35 thousand in data processing; an increase of $16 thousand in charitable contributions; an increase of $33 thousand in professional services and an increase in other operating expenses of $138 thousand; offset by a decrease of $30 thousand in occupancy and equipment expense, and a decrease of $11 thousand in loan expenses.

Non-interest expenses increased $963 thousand or 11% from $8.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $9.7 million for the same period ended September 30, 2011. The increase is due to: an increase of $429 thousand in salary and employee benefits, the majority of which are in conjunction with increased branch staffing and salary adjustments; an increase of $23 thousand in occupancy and equipment expense resulting from increases in other occupancy costs associated with the offices; an increase of $142 thousand in credit card expense due to an increase in volume; an increase of $96 thousand in advertising; an increase of $22 thousand in loan expenses due to an increase in loan volume, and the appraisal costs and recording filing fees associated with the increased volume; an increase of $104 thousand in data processing; an increase of $12 thousand in professional services; an increase of  $42 thousand in charitable contributions and an increase in other operating expenses of $94 thousand.

A breakdown of other expenses can be found in the statements of income.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $637 thousand, or 30.05% of income before taxes. The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $467 thousand, or 28.86%. The increase in the tax rate is a result of an increase in taxable loans, offset to a lesser extent by an increase in tax-free investments and loans.  The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $1.5 million, or 28.99% of income before taxes. The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $1.3 million, or 29.02%.  The reduction in the tax rate is a result of increases in the tax-free investment and loan portfolios.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Securities

The Bank’s securities portfolio continues to be classified, in its entirety, as “available for sale.” Management believes that a portfolio classification of available for sale allows complete flexibility in the investment portfolio. Using this classification, the Bank intends to hold these securities for an indefinite amount of time, but not necessarily to maturity. Such securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The portfolio is structured to provide maximum return on investments while providing a consistent source of liquidity and meeting strict risk standards. Investment securities consist primarily of U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities issued by FHLMC or FNMA, corporate bonds, and taxable and non taxable municipal bonds. The Bank holds no high-risk securities or derivatives as of September 30, 2011. The Bank has not made any investments in non-U.S. government agency mortgage backed securities or sub-prime loans.

Total securities at September 30, 2011 were $88.6 million compared to $89.9 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease in the investment portfolio is the result of principal payments on U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities, maturities and calls of securities.  The carrying value of the securities portfolio as of September 30, 2011 includes a net unrealized gain of $3.0 million, which is recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity net of income tax effect. This compares to a net unrealized gain of $449 thousand at December 31, 2010. The current unrealized gain position of the securities portfolio is due to the changes in market rates since December 31, 2010. No securities are deemed to be other than temporarily impaired.

Restricted investments in bank stock consists of FHLB stock and ACBB stock. Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. The restricted stocks are carried at cost. The Company had $1.7 million of FHLB stock and $40 thousand of ACBB stock as of September 30, 2011.

27

In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock and as of September 30, 2011 has not resumed dividend payments. During 2011 and 2010, FHLB of Pittsburgh conducted a limited excess capital stock repurchase based upon positive net income results. In connection with this program, the Bank had stock at a carrying value of $281 thousand repurchased during the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, and no repurchases were made during the same period in 2010.  Any future capital stock repurchases are expected to be made on a quarterly basis if conditions warrant such repurchases.

Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 942, “Accounting by Certain Entities (Including Entities With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others.” Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.

Based upon its evaluation of the foregoing criteria, management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB or ACBB restricted stock as of September 30, 2011.

Loans

The loan portfolio comprises a major component of the Bank’s earning assets. All of the Bank’s loans are to domestic borrowers. Total net loans at September 30, 2011 increased $23.3 million to $407.7 million from $384.5 million at December 31, 2010. The loan to deposit ratio decreased slightly from 93.5% at December 31, 2010 to 91.8% at September 30, 2011. The Bank’s loan portfolio at September 30, 2011 was comprised of residential real estate and consumer loans of $199.2 million, an increase of $21.0 million from December 31, 2010, and commercial loans of $212.8 million, an increase of $2.7 million from December 31, 2010.  The Bank has not originated, nor does it intend to originate, sub-prime mortgage loans.

Credit Risk and Loan Quality

The allowance for loan losses increased $395 thousand to $4.1 million at September 30, 2011 from $3.7 million at December 31, 2010. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses represented 1.00% and 0.96%, respectively, of total loans. Based upon current economic conditions, the composition of the loan portfolio, the perceived credit risk in the portfolio and loan-loss experience of comparable institutions in the Bank’s market area, management feels the allowance is adequate to absorb reasonably anticipated losses.

At September 30, 2011, aggregate balances on non-performing loans equaled $7.5 million compared to $6.3 million at December 31, 2010 and $9.1 million at September 30, 2010, representing 1.82%, 1.63% and 2.39% of total loans at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Troubled debt restructurings, included in the following table, represent loans where the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, has granted a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Of the loans modified under a troubled debt restructuring, $4.6 million were current under their modified terms, and $1.3 million were past due 30 plus days at September 30, 2011. The details for non-performing loans are included in the following table (dollars in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
	2011			2010			2010
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-accrual - commercial	$	1,066		$	1,140		$	5,403
Non-accrual - consumer		356			381			843
Restructured loans (still accruing interest)		5,213			3,345			2,718
Loans past due 90 or more days, accruing interest		857			1,464			-
Other		-			-			159
Total nonperforming loans		7,492			6,330			9,123
Foreclosed assets		3,069			3,069			-
Total nonperforming assets	$	10,561		$	9,399		$	9,123
Nonperforming loans to total loans at period-end		1.82	%		1.63	%		2.39	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		1.97	%		1.83	%		1.78	%

28

Premises and Equipment

Company premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, decreased $318 thousand from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011. This decrease is due primarily to depreciation on existing premises and equipment.

On October 21, 2011, the Bank executed a second lease expansion addendum agreement (the “Addendum”) to the Lease agreement dated June 11, 2001 with Red Bird Associates, LLC (“Red Bird”) providing for the lease of the Bank’s principal office located at 100 Gateway Drive in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (the “Lease”).  The Addendum provides for the lease by the Bank of an additional 4,303 square feet of space on the second floor of the premises, effective January 1, 2012, and continuing for the remaining term of the underlying Lease, including all renewal options, at an additional annual rental amount of $73 thousand.  Pursuant to the terms of the Addendum, the rental amount will increase annually by 3.0% over the annual rent for the immediately preceding Lease year.  The Addendum further provides the Bank with a right of first refusal with respect to any written offer to lease or purchase the premises received by Red Bird.  As disclosed in the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 29, 2011, Red Bird is a real estate holding company owned by several Directors of the Company and the Bank, as well as Judith A. Hunsicker, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating and Financial Officer.  Prior to its execution, the terms of the Addendum, including the rental amount, were determined by a majority of the disinterested Directors to be no less favorable to the Bank than the terms then prevailing in the relevant market.

Deposits

Total deposits at September 30, 2011 increased $33.4 million to $448.7 million from $415.3 million at December 31, 2010. Savings deposits increased by $50.1 million and demand deposits increased by $8.0 million, while time deposits decreased $24.1 million. The significant growth in savings and demand deposits is attributed to successful promotions, as well as migration from time deposits.

Liquidity

Liquidity represents the Company’s ability to meet the demands required for the funding of loans and to meet depositors’ requirements for use of their funds. The Company’s sources of liquidity are cash balances, due from banks, and federal funds sold. Cash and cash equivalents were $23.1 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $19.6 million at December 31, 2010.

Additional asset liquidity sources include principal and interest payments from the investment security and loan portfolios. Long-term liquidity needs may be met by selling unpledged securities available for sale, selling loans or raising additional capital. At September 30, 2011, the Company had $88.6 million of available for sale securities. Securities with carrying values of approximately $44 million and $58.2 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, public deposits, and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The Bank also has borrowing capacity with the FHLB of approximately $190.6 million, of which $7.9 million was outstanding in long-term loans at September 30, 2011.  The Bank also has a line of credit with FHLB for $25 million, of which there is no balance outstanding as of September 30, 2011.   All of the long-term loans mature in 2013. The Bank also has a line of credit with ACBB of approximately $6.0 million, of which none was outstanding at September 30, 2011. All FHLB borrowings are secured by qualifying assets of the Bank and advances from the ACBB line are unsecured.

The Company has two lines of credit totaling an aggregate of $10 million with Univest National Bank, of which an aggregate of $5.4 million was outstanding at September 30, 2011. These lines of credit are secured by 833,333 shares of Bank common stock.

The Company has no investment in or financial relationship with any unconsolidated entities that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on liquidity or capital resources.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not reflect various off-balance sheet arrangements that are made in the normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk. These off-balance sheet arrangements consist of unfunded loans and commitments, as well as lines of credit made under the same standards as on-balance sheet instruments. These unused commitments totaled $15.7 million at September 30, 2011. The Company also has letters of credit outstanding of $4.4 million at September 30, 2011. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to the Company. Management is of the opinion that the Company’s liquidity is sufficient to meet its anticipated needs.

29

Capital Resources and Adequacy

Total stockholders’ equity was $42.5 million as of September 30, 2011, representing a net increase of $5.7 million from December 31, 2010. The increase in capital was a result of the net income of $3.7 million and the increase in unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities of $1.7 million, the exercise of stock options totaling $114 thousand, offset by $133 thousand attributable to stock tendered in connection with the exercise of stock options, the recognition of tax benefits of $602 thousand due to the exercise of non-qualified stock options; and a dividend payment of $215 thousand.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

The regulations require that banks maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk weighted assets (as defined), and Tier I capital to average assets (as defined). As of September 30, 2011, the Bank met the minimum requirements. In addition, the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded the amounts required to be considered “well capitalized” as defined in the regulations.

The following table provides a comparison of the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Tier I, common stockholders' equity	$	44,866		$	41,712
Tier II, allowable portion of allowance for loan losses		4,104			3,709
Total capital	$	48,970		$	45,421
Tier I risk based capital ratio		12.3	%		11.9	%
Total risk based capital ratio		13.4	%		13.0	%
Tier I leverage ratio		8.5	%		8.1	%

Note: Unrealized gains on securities available for sale are excluded from regulatory capital components of risk-based capital and leverage ratios.

The Federal banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies. Currently, the required minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. At least half of the total capital is required to be Tier I capital, consisting principally of common shareholders’ equity, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill. The remainder (Tier II capital) may consist of a limited amount of subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities, perpetual preferred stock and a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance.

In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the federal banking regulators established minimum leverage ratio (Tier I capital to total assets) guidelines for bank holding companies. These guidelines provide for a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for those bank holding companies which have the highest regulatory examination ratings and are not contemplating or experiencing significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4%.

30

The following table provides the Company’s risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Tier I, common stockholders' equity	$	40,509		$	36,433
Tier II, allowable portion of allowance for loan losses		4,104			3,709
Total capital	$	44,613		$	40,142
Tier I risk based capital ratio		11.1	%		10.2	%
Total risk based capital ratio		12.2	%		11.0	%
Tier I leverage ratio		7.6	%		7.1	%

Prior to September 2010, the Company qualified as a “small bank holding company” under the Federal Reserve Board’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (the “Policy Statement”), which exempts bank holding companies with assets of less than $500 million from the  risk-based and leverage capital guidelines generally applicable to bank holding companies. Application of this exemption therefore permits a small bank holding company to maintain debt levels that are higher than what would typically be permitted for larger bank holding companies. As of September 2010, the Company exceeds $500 million in assets and, therefore, no longer meets the eligibility criteria of a small bank holding company in accordance with the Policy Statement. Accordingly, the Company is no longer exempt from the regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable.

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). This term refers to the controls and procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2011, and they have concluded that, as of this date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at ensuring that required information will be disclosed on a timely basis in our reports filed under the Exchange Act.

There were no significant changes to our internal controls over financial reporting or in the other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.

31

Part II - Other Information

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

The Company and the Bank are an occasional party to legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the Company has adequate legal defenses and/or insurance coverage respecting any and each of these actions and does not believe that they will materially affect the Company’s operations or financial position.

Item 1A - Risk Factors

Not Applicable

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased			(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of  Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or  Approximate Dollar Value) of shares that  May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or  Programs
4/01/2011 - 4/30/2011		0			n/a		0		0
5/01/2011 - 5/31/2011		11,024	¹	$	6.65		0		0
6/01/2011 - 6/30/2011		0			n/a		0		0
7/01/2011 - 7/31/2011		0			n/a		0		0
8/01/2011 - 8/31/2011		0			n/a		0		0
9/01/2011 - 9/30/2011		8,901	¹	$	6.65		0		0
Total		19,925	¹	$	6.65		0		0

(1)  This repurchase of shares was made in order to facilitate the stock swap of stock options by certain employees of the Company, including David M. Lobach, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Judith A. Hunsicker, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and with respect to Mr. Lobach, to satisfy applicable withholding taxes resulting therefrom, in each case pursuant to stock option agreements between such employees and the Company.

32

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable.

Item 4 – (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5 - Other Information

Not Applicable.

Item 6 - Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation as amended (conformed) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2010).
3.2	By-Laws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of Registrant’s Form 8-A filed on December 11, 2008).
11.1	The statement regarding computation of per share earnings required by this exhibit is contained in Note 5 to the financial statements under the caption “Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share.”
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
32.	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	The following Exhibits are being furnished* as part of this report:
	No.	Description
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.*
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document.*
	______________________
*	These interactive data files are being furnished as part of this Quarterly Report, and, in accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

33

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		EMBASSY BANCORP, INC.
		(Registrant)
Dated: November 14, 2011	By:	/s/ David M. Lobach, Jr.
		David M. Lobach, Jr.
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 14, 2011	By:	/s/ Judith A. Hunsicker
		Judith A. Hunsicker
		Senior Executive Vice President,
		Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

34

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation as amended (conformed) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2010).
3.2	By-Laws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of Registrant’s Form 8-A filed on December 11, 2008).
11.1	The statement regarding computation of per share earnings required by this exhibit is contained in Note 5 to the financial statements under the caption “Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share.”
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
32.	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	The following Exhibits are being furnished* as part of this report:
	No.	Description
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.*
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document.*
	______________________
*	These interactive data files are being furnished as part of this Quarterly Report, and, in accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

35

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David M. Lobach, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Embassy Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

	By:	/s/ David M. Lobach, Jr.
	DAVID M. LOBACH, JR.
DATED:  November 14, 2011	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Judith A. Hunsicker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Embassy Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

	By:	/s/ Judith A. Hunsicker
	JUDITH A. HUNSICKER
	Senior Executive Vice President, Chief
DATED:  November 14, 2011	Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We hereby certify that the foregoing Form 10-Q of Embassy Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2011 complies in all respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Embassy Bancorp, Inc.

	/s/ David M. Lobach, Jr.
	DAVID M. LOBACH, JR.
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	/s/ Judith A. Hunsicker
	JUDITH A. HUNSICKER
	Senior Executive Vice President,
	Chief Operating Officer and
	Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 14, 2011

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Loans and Leases Receivable, Allowance	$ 4,104	$ 3,709
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share	$ 1	$ 1
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	20,000,000	20,000,000
Common Stock, Shares, Issued	7,171,551	7,157,357
Common Stock, Shares, Outstanding	7,171,198	7,157,004
Treasury Stock, Shares	353	353

XML

Consolidated Statements of Income (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
INTEREST INCOME
Loans receivable, including fees	$ 5,378	$ 5,193	$ 15,532	$ 15,236
Securities, taxable	379	584	1,280	1,736
Securities, non-taxable	285	251	781	700
Federal funds sold, and other	6	7	21	22
Interest on time deposits	29	32	90	105
Total Interest Income	6,077	6,067	17,704	17,799
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	1,010	1,170	3,035	3,727
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased	38	92	136	314
Long-term borrowings	186	187	556	578
Total Interest Expense	1,234	1,449	3,727	4,619
Net Interest Income	4,843	4,618	13,977	13,180
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	238	350	541	833
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses	4,605	4,268	13,436	12,347
OTHER INCOME
Credit card processing fees	243	196	702	566
Other service fees	109	102	318	276
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities	487		487
Total Other Income	839	298	1,507	842
OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits	1,369	1,251	4,136	3,707
Occupancy and equipment	532	562	1,626	1,603
Data processing	231	196	738	634
Credit card processing	231	184	674	532
Advertising and promotion	233	203	650	554
Professional fees	123	90	294	282
Loan department	43	54	137	115
Charitable contributions	95	79	306	265
Other	467	329	1,160	1,066
Total Other Expenses	3,324	2,948	9,721	8,758
Income before Income Taxes	2,120	1,618	5,222	4,431
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	637	467	1,514	1,286
Net Income	$ 1,483	$ 1,151	$ 3,708	$ 3,145
BASIC EARNING PER SHARE	$ 0.21	$ 0.17	$ 0.52	$ 0.45
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE	$ 0.21	$ 0.16	$ 0.51	$ 0.43
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE			$ 0.03	$ 0.02

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Nov. 10, 2011
Document and Entity Information
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	Embassy Bancorp, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001449794
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		7,171,198

XML

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Note 5 – Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, as adjusted for stock dividends and splits. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustments to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(Dollars In Thousands, except per share data)
Net income	$	1,483	$	1,151	$	3,708	$	3,145
Weighted average shares outstanding		7,167		6,972		7,162		6,971
Dilutive effect of potential common shares, stock options		34		190		40		267
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		7,201		7,162		7,202		7,238
Basic earnings per share	$	0.21	$	0.17	$	0.52	$	0.45
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.21	$	0.16	$	0.51	$	0.43

Stock options of 72,439 and 72,739 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because they are not dilutive to earnings.

XML

Loans Receivable and Credit Quality

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Loans Receivable and Credit Quality

Loans Receivable and Credit Quality

Note 10 – Loans Receivable and Credit Quality

The following table presents the composition of loans receivable at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Balance			Percentage of Total Loans			Balance			Percentage of Total Loans
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	170,837			41.46	%	$	166,780			42.95	%
Commercial construction		15,118			3.67	%		15,701			4.04	%
Commercial		26,846			6.52	%		27,591			7.11	%
Residential real estate		196,048			47.59	%		176,141			45.37	%
Consumer		3,137			0.76	%		2,048			0.53	%
Gross loans		411,986			100.00	%		388,261			100.00	%
Unearned origination (fees) costs		(160	)					(96	)
Allowance for loan losses		(4,104	)					(3,709	)
	$	407,722					$	384,456

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention (potential weakness identified), substandard (well defined weakness) and doubtful (unlikely to be paid in full) within the Company's internal risk rating system as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

September 30, 2011:	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	165,766	$	946	$	4,016	$	109	$	170,837
Commercial construction		11,144		-		3,974		-		15,118
Commercial		26,518		253		75		-		26,846
Residential real estate		195,569		123		-		356		196,048
Consumer		3,137		-		-		-		3,137
Total	$	402,134	$	1,322	$	8,065	$	465	$	411,986
December 31, 2010:
Commercial real estate	$	159,513	$	601	$	6,407	$	259	$	166,780
Commercial construction		15,576		125		-		-		15,701
Commercial		27,023		229		339		-		27,591
Residential real estate		175,635		125		-		381		176,141
Consumer		2,048		-		-		-		2,048
Total	$	379,795	$	1,080	$	6,746	$	640	$	388,261

The following table summarizes information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

September 30, 2011:	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	4,975	$	5,025			$	5,125	$	154
Commercial construction		3,974		3,974				3,155		117
Commercial		328		377				426		11
Residential real estate		479		604				480		5
Consumer		-		-				-		-
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate	$	96	$	96	$	11	$	96	$	3
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		-
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
Total:
Commercial real estate	$	5,071	$	5,121	$	11	$	5,221	$	157
Commercial construction		3,974		3,974		-		3,155		117
Commercial		328		377		-		426		11
Residential real estate		479		604		-		480		5
Consumer		-		-		-		-		-
	$	9,852	$	10,076	$	11	$	9,283	$	290
December 31, 2010:
With no related allowance recorded:	$	7,108	$	7,108			$	5,825	$	84
Commercial real estate		125		125				31		-
Commercial construction		568		568				479		4
Commercial		506		506				369		4
Residential real estate		-		-				-		-
Consumer
With an allowance recorded:	$	159	$	159	$	15	$	40	$	4
Commercial real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-		-
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer
Total:	$	7,267	$	7,267	$	15	$	5,865	$	88
Commercial real estate		125		125		-		31		-
Commercial construction		568		568		-		479		4
Commercial		506		506		-		369		4
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer	$	8,466	$	8,466	$	15	$	6,744	$	96

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	1,066	$	1,140
Commercial construction		-		-
Commercial		-		-
Residential real estate		356		381
Consumer		-		-
Total	$	1,422	$	1,521

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due.  The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

September 30, 2011:	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Loans Receivable >90 Days and Accruing
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	1,680	$	3,314	$	1,924	$	6,918	$	163,919	$	170,837	$	857
Commercial construction		1,061		-		-		1,061		14,057		15,118		-
Commercial		493		62		-		555		26,291		26,846		-
Residential real estate		-		-		356		356		195,692		196,048		-
Consumer		-		-		7		7		3,130		3,137		-
Total	$	3,234	$	3,376	$	2,287	$	8,897	$	403,089	$	411,986	$	857
December 31, 2010:
Commercial real estate	$	2,272	$	579	$	2,604	$	5,455	$	161,325	$	166,780	$	1,464
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-		15,701		15,701		-
Commercial		-		20		-		20		27,571		27,591		-
Residential real estate		-		104		381		485		175,656		176,141		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-		2,048		2,048		-
Total	$	2,272	$	703	$	2,985	$	5,960	$	382,301	$	388,261	$	1,464

The following table summarizes information in regards to the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans receivable at September 30, 2011 and the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended:

	Commercial Real Estate			Commercial Construction			Commercial			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
	(In Thousands)
Allowance for credit losses
Three months ending:
Beginning Balance - June 30, 2011	$	1,384		$	340		$	309		$	1,413		$	53		$	413		$	3,912
Charge-offs		(50	)		-			-			-			-			-			(50	)
Recoveries		-			-			-			-			4			-			4
Provisions		(40	)		54			98			72			(12	)		66			238
Ending balance - September 30, 2011	$	1,294		$	394		$	407		$	1,485		$	45		$	479		$	4,104
Nine months ending:
Beginning Balance - December 31, 2010	$	1,014		$	443		$	325		$	1,309		$	35		$	583		$	3,709
Charge-offs		(137	)		-			(1	)		(25	)		-			-			(163	)
Recoveries		1			-			4			-			12			-			17
Provisions		416			(49	)		79			201			(2	)		(104	)		541
Ending balance - September 30, 2011	$	1,294		$	394		$	407		$	1,485		$	45		$	479		$	4,104
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	11		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	11
Ending balance: collectively evaluted for impairment	$	1,283		$	394		$	407		$	1,485		$	45		$	478		$	4,093
Loans receivables:
Ending balance	$	170,837		$	15,118		$	26,846		$	196,048		$	3,137					$	411,986
Ending balance: individually evaluted  for impairment	$	5,071		$	3,974		$	328		$	479		$	-					$	9,852
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	165,766		$	11,144		$	26,518		$	195,569		$	3,137					$	402,134

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company may grant a concession or modification for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial condition than it would not otherwise consider, resulting in a modified loan which is then identified as troubled debt restructuring ("TDR").  The Company may modify loans through rate reductions, extensions to maturity, interest only payments, or payment modifications to better coincide the timing of payments due under the modified terms with the expected timing of cash flows from the borrowers' operations.  Loan modifications are intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral.  TDRs are considered impaired loans for purposes of calculating the Company's allowance for loan losses.

The Company identifies loans for potential restructure primarily through direct communication with the borrower and the evaluation of the borrower's financial statements, revenue projections, tax returns, and credit reports.  Even if the borrower is not presently in default, management will consider the likelihood that cash flow shortages, adverse economic conditions, and negative trends may result in a payment default in the near future.

The Company adopted the amendments in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02 during the current period ended September 30, 2011. As required, the Company reassessed all restructurings that occurred on or after the beginning of the current fiscal year (January 1, 2011) for identification as TDRs. The Company did not identify any additional TDR receivables for which the allowance for credit losses had previously been measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology.

The following table presents TDRs outstanding as of September 30, 2011:

	September 30, 2011
	Accrual Loans		Non-Accrual Loans		Total Modifications
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate	$	2,191	$	711	$	2,902
Commercial construction		2,808		-		2,808
Commercial		214		-		214
Residential real estate		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-
	$	5,213	$	711	$	5,924

As of September 30, 2011, no available commitments were outstanding on TDRs.

The following tables present newly restructured loans that occurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively:

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Three months ended September 30, 2011:	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial real estate		-	$	-	$	-
Commercial construction		1		350		350
		1	$	350	$	350

	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Nine months ended September 30, 2011:	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial real estate		1	$	11	$	11
Commercial construction		4		2,808		2,808
		5	$	2,819	$	2,819

The TDRs described above did not require an impairment reserve recorded in the allowance for loan losses for the three and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011.  One commercial construction loan was a new loan to pay off the remaining balance of a prior TDR where term, rate and payment were modified in the amount of $350 thousand.  Three commercial construction loans had term modifications totaling $2.5 million; the remaining loan was a new commercial real estate loan to pay taxes on an existing TDR loan in the amount of $11 thousand.

The following tables represent financing receivables modified as TDRs with payment defaults, with the payment defaults occurring within 12 months of the restructure date, and the payment default occurring during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively:

	September 30, 2011
	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
	(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate		-	$	-		4	$	1,309
Commercial construction		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-
Residential real estate		-		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-		-
		-	$	-		4	$	1,309

XML

Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Embassy Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") is a Pennsylvania corporation organized in 2008 and registered as a bank holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHC Act"). The Company was formed for purposes of acquiring Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley (the "Bank") in connection with the reorganization of the Bank into a bank holding company structure, which was consummated on November 11, 2008. Accordingly, the Company owns all of the capital stock of the Bank, giving the organization more flexibility in meeting its capital needs as the Company continues to grow. Embassy Holdings, LLC (the "LLC") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank organized to engage in the holding of property acquired by the Bank in satisfaction of debts previously contracted.  As such, the consolidated financial statements contained herein include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and the LLC. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Bank, which is the Company's principal operating subsidiary, was originally incorporated as a Pennsylvania bank on May 11, 2001 and opened its doors on November 6, 2001. It was formed by a group of local business persons and professionals with significant prior experience in community banking in the Lehigh Valley area of Pennsylvania, the Bank's primary market area.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles ("US GAAP") for interim financial information and in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

The consolidated financial statements presented in this report should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the Company's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 31, 2011.

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluated the events and transactions that occurred after September 30, 2011 through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Certain amounts in the 2010 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on 2010 net income.

XML

Short-term and Long-term Borrowings

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Short-term and Long-term Borrowings

Short-term and Long-term Borrowings

Note 7 – Short-term and Long-term Borrowings

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh ("FHLB") short term advances generally represent overnight or less than twelve month borrowings. Long term advances from the FHLB are for proceeds of twelve months or more and are generally less than sixty months. The Bank has an agreement with the FHLB which allows for borrowings up to a percentage of qualifying assets. At September 30, 2011, the Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity for short-term and long-term advances of approximately $190.6 million, of which $7.9 million were outstanding in long-term loans. Long-term loans with FHLB of $7.9 million were outstanding at December 31, 2010. There were no short-term advances outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. All FHLB borrowings are secured by qualifying assets of the Bank.

The Bank has a federal funds line of credit with the Atlantic Central Bankers Bank ("ACBB") of approximately $6.0 million, of which none was outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Advances from this line are unsecured.

The Company has two lines of credit with Univest National Bank and Trust Company ("Univest") totaling $10 million. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance was $5.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively. Advances from these lines of credit are secured by 833,333 shares of Bank common stock. Under the terms of the loan agreement, the Bank is required to remain well capitalized. The proceeds of the loan were primarily used for the holding company's investment in the Bank, thus providing additional capital to support the Bank's growth.

XML

New Accounting Standards

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

New Accounting Standards

New Accounting Standards

Note 12 – New Accounting Standards

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring to clarify the accounting principles applied to loan modifications, as defined by FASB ASC Subtopic 310-40, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The Update clarifies guidance on a creditor's evaluation of whether or not a concession has been granted, with an emphasis on evaluating all aspects of the modification rather than a focus on specific criteria, such as the effective interest rate test, to determine a concession. The Update goes on to provide guidance on specific types of modifications, such as changes in the interest rate of the borrowing and insignificant delays in payments, as well as guidance on the creditor's evaluation of whether or not a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. For public entities, the amendments in the Update are effective for the first interim or annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The entity should also disclose information required by ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which had previously been deferred by ASU 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company adopted the guidance for the period ended September 30, 2011 with no impact on the Company's financial conditions or operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This update amends FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, to bring U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements in line with International Accounting Standards. The Update clarifies existing guidance for items such as: the application of the highest and best use concept to non-financial assets and liabilities; the application of fair value measurement to financial instruments classified in a reporting entity's stockholder's equity; and disclosure requirements regarding quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of level 3 assets. The Update also creates an exception to Topic 820 for entities which carry financial instruments within a portfolio or group, under which the entity is now permitted to base the price used for fair valuation upon a price that would be received to sell the net asset position or transfer a net liability position in an orderly transaction. The Update also allows for the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement if the financial instrument is categorized in level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Lastly, the ASU contains new disclosure requirements regarding fair value amounts categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy such as: disclosure of the valuation process used; effects of and relationships between unobservable inputs; usage of nonfinancial assets for purposes other than their highest and best use when that is the basis of the disclosed fair value; and categorization by level of items disclosed at fair value, but not measured at fair value for financial statement purposes. For public entities, this Update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will impact its financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.  The provisions of this update amend FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to facilitate the continued alignment of U.S. GAAP with International Accounting Standards. The Update prohibits the presentation of the components of comprehensive income in the statement of stockholder's equity. Reporting entities are allowed to present either: a statement of comprehensive income, which reports both net income and other comprehensive income; or separate statements of net income and other comprehensive income. Under previous GAAP, all 3 presentations were acceptable. Regardless of the presentation selected, the Reporting Entity is required to present all reclassifications between other comprehensive and net income on the face of the new statement or statements. The provisions of this Update are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2011 for public entities.  As the two remaining options for presentation existed prior to the issuance of this Update, early adoption is permitted.

XML

Securities Available For Sale

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Securities Avaliable For Sale

Securities Available For Sale

Note 8 – Securities Available For Sale

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, the amortized cost and fair values of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2011
U.S Government and agency obligations	$	31,457	$	341	$	-		$	31,798
Municipal bonds		37,424		1,856		(1	)		39,279
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		12,268		707		-			12,975
Corporate bonds		4,517		116		(59	)		4,574
Total	$	85,666	$	3,020	$	(60	)	$	88,626
December 31, 2010:
U.S Government and agency obligations	$	32,669	$	120	$	(167	)	$	32,622
Municipal bonds		37,012		102		(568	)		36,546
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		15,961		815		(27	)		16,749
Corporate bonds		3,780		174		-			3,954
Total	$	89,422	$	1,211	$	(762	)	$	89,871

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of September 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without any penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In Thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	5,304	$	5,363
Due after one year through five years		32,749		33,186
Due after five years through ten years		6,696		7,031
Due after ten years		28,649		30,071
		73,398		75,651
Mortgage-backed securities		12,268		12,975
	$	85,666	$	88,626

Proceeds from the sales of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $7 million, with gross gains of $487 thousand.  The proceeds were used, in part, to purchase tax-free securities. There were no sales of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Securities with a carrying value of $44.0 and $58.2 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were subject to agreements to repurchase, pledged to secure public deposits, or pledged for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The following table shows the Company's investments' gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2011:	(In Thousands)
Municipal bonds	$	770	$	(1	)	$	-	$	-	$	770	$	(1	)
Corporate Bonds		1,936		(59	)		-		-		1,936		(59	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	2,706	$	(60	)	$	-	$	-	$	2,706	$	(60	)
December 31, 2010:
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations	$	27,455	$	(167	)	$	-	$	-	$	27,455	$	(167	)
Municipal bonds		27,880		(568	)		-		-		27,880		(568	)
Mortgage -backed securities - residential		1,584		(27	)		-		-		1,584		(27	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	56,919	$	(762	)	$	-	$	-	$	56,919	$	(762	)

The Company had three (3) securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011. The unrealized losses are due only to interest rate fluctuations. As of September 30, 2011, the Company either has the intent and ability to hold the securities until maturity or market price recovery, or believes that it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell such securities. Management believes that the unrealized loss only represents temporary impairment of the securities.

XML

Guarantees

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Guarantees

Guarantees

Note 6 – Guarantees

The Company, through the Bank, does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank generally holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Company had $­4.6 million of standby letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2011. The approximate value of underlying collateral upon liquidation that would be expected to cover this maximum potential exposure was $4.4 million. Management does not consider the current amount of the liability as of September 30, 2011 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued to be material.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Stock Options Exercised	34,119	294,075
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Declared	$ 0.03	$ 0.02
Stock Repurchased During Period, Shares	19,925	179,666

XML

Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies of the Company as applied in the interim financial statements presented are substantially the same as those followed on an annual basis as presented in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

XML

Stockholders Equity

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Stockholders' Equity

Stockholders' Equity

Note 3 – Stockholders' Equity

On November 11, 2008, the Company consummated its acquisition of Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley pursuant to a Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 18, 2008, pursuant to which the Bank was reorganized into a bank holding company structure. At the effective time of the reorganization, each share of common stock of Embassy Bank For The Lehigh Valley issued and outstanding was automatically converted into one share of Company common stock. The issuance of Company common stock in connection with the reorganization was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASC, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The recent fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

ASC Topic 860 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 860 are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset's or liability's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are as follows:

Description	(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs		(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total
	(In Thousands)
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	-	$	31,798	$	-	$	31,798
Municipal Bonds		-		39,279		-		39,279
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		-		12,975		-		12,975
Corporate bonds		-		4,574		-		4,574
September 30, 2011 Securities available for sale	$	-	$	88,626	$	-	$	88,626
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	-	$	32,622	$	-	$	32,622
Municipal Bonds		-		36,546		-		36,546
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		-		16,749		-		16,749
Corporate bonds		-		3,954		-		3,954
December 31, 2010 Securities available for sale	$	-	$	89,871	$	-	$	89,871

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are as follows:

Description	(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs		(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total
	(In Thousands)
September 30, 2011 Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	85	$	85
September 30, 2011 Other real estate owned	$	-	$	-	$	3,069	$	3,069
December 31, 2010 Impaired loans	$	-	$	-	$	144	$	144
December 31, 2010 Other real estate owned	$	-	$	-	$	3,069	$	3,069

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company's assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company's disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company's financial instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets' fair values.

Interest Bearing Time Deposits (Carried at Cost)

Fair values for fixed-rate time certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.

Securities Available for Sale (Carried at Fair Value)

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) are determined by matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.  The measurement of fair value should be consistent with one of the following valuation techniques: market approach, income approach, and/or cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business). For example, valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables. Multiples might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable. The selection of where within the range the appropriate multiple falls requires judgment, considering factors specific to the measurement (qualitative and quantitative). Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include matrix pricing.

Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost)

The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, and projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

Impaired Loans (Generally Carried at Fair Value)

Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under existing FASB guidance, in which the Bank has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan's collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

At September 30, 2011, of the impaired loans having an aggregate balance of $9.8 million, $9.7 million did not require a valuation allowance because the value of the collateral securing the loan was determined to meet or exceed the balance owed on the loan. Of the remaining $96 thousand in impaired loans, an aggregate valuation allowance of $11 thousand was required to reflect what was determined to be a shortfall in the value of the collateral as compared to the balance on such loans.

Restricted Investment in Bank Stock (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (Carried at Cost)

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost)

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Federal Funds Purchased (Carried at Cost)

These borrowings are short term and the carrying amount approximates the fair value.

Long-Term Borrowings (Carried at Cost)

Fair values of FHLB and Univest advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB and Univest advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (Disclosed at Cost)

Fair values for the Company's off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties' credit standing.

The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments were as follows at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
	(In Thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,086	$	23,086	$	19,643	$	19,643
Interest bearing time deposits		7,635		7,643		8,326		8,434
Securities available-for-sale		88,626		88,626		89,871		89,871
Loans receivable, net of allowance		407,722		416,033		384,456		388,794
Restricted investment in bank stock		1,725		1,725		2,006		2,006
Accrued interest receivable		1,618		1,618		1,503		1,503
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		448,683		449,451		415,267		416,508
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		29,774		29,776		46,433		46,435
Long-term borrowings		13,286		13,674		13,586		14,006
Accrued interest payable		652		652		941		941
Off-balance sheet finanacial instruments:
Commitments to grant loans		-		-		-		-
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit		-		-		-		-
Standby letters of credit		-		-		-		-

XML

Comprehensive Income

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

Note 4 – Comprehensive Income

The only other comprehensive income item that the Company presently has is unrealized gains on securities available for sale. The components of the change in unrealized gains for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(In thousands)
Change in unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale	$	750		$	1,151		$	2,998		$	1,478
Less: Reclassification adjustment for realized gains (losses)		(487	)		-			(487	)		-
		263			1,151			2,511			1,478
Tax effect		(90	)		(391	)		(853	)		(502	)
Change in net unrealized gains	$	173		$	760		$	1,658		$	976

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (USD $) In Thousands	Common Stock [Member]	Surplus [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Total
BALANCE- at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 6,941	$ 22,900	$ 2,455	$ 1,384	$ (3)	$ 33,677
Comprehensive income:
Net income			3,145			3,145
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment and income tax effects				976		976
Total Comprehensive Income						4,121
Dividend declared			(141)			(141)
Exercise of stock options	294	543				837
Stock tendered for funding exercise of stock options	(180)	(808)				(988)
BALANCE- at Sep. 30, 2010	7,055	22,635	5,459	2,360	(3)	37,506
BALANCE- at Dec. 31, 2010	7,157	22,303	6,976	296	(3)	36,729
Comprehensive income:
Net income			3,708			3,708
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment and income tax effects				1,658		1,658
Total Comprehensive Income						5,366
Dividend declared			(215)			(215)
Exercise of stock options	34	80				114
Stock tendered for funding exercise of stock options	(20)	(113)				(133)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		602				602
BALANCE- at Sep. 30, 2011	$ 7,171	$ 22,872	$ 10,469	$ 1,954	$ (3)	$ 42,463

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 3,708	$ 3,145
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	541	833
Accretion of deferred loan costs	(22)	(71)
Depreciation and amortization	470	458
Net amortization of investment security premiums and discounts	254	87
Net realized gain on sale of securities	(487)
Increase in accrued interest receivable	(115)	(170)
Increase in other assets	15	344
Decrease in accrued interest payable	(289)	(379)
Increase in other liabilities	1,519	562
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	5,594	4,809
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of securities available for sale	(11,572)	(32,420)
Sales of securities available for sale	6,592
Maturities, calls and principal repayments of securities available for sale	8,969	13,016
Net increase in loans	(23,785)	(32,844)
Redemption of restricted investment in bank stock	281
Net maturities of interest bearing time deposits	691	2,513
Purchases of premises and equipment	(152)	(500)
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities	(18,976)	(50,235)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits	33,416	30,241
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased	(16,659)	15,786
Payment of long-term borrowed funds	(300)	(3,430)
Net payment of stock tendered	(19)	(151)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised	602
Dividends paid	(215)	(141)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	16,825	42,305
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	3,443	(3,121)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING	19,643	26,464
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - ENDING	23,086	23,343
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid	4,016	4,998
Income taxes paid	$ 500	$ 1,286

XML

Restricted Investment In Bank Stock

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Restricted Investment in Bank Stock Disclosure

Restricted Investments in Bank Stock

Note 9 – Restricted Investment In Bank Stock

Restricted investments in bank stock consist of Federal Home Loan Bank stock ("FHLB") and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock.  The restricted stocks are carried at cost.

The Bank owns restricted stock investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"). Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock according to a predetermined formula.  In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock and as of September 30, 2011 has not resumed dividend payments. During 2011 and 2010, FHLB of Pittsburgh conducted a limited excess capital stock repurchase based upon positive net income results. In connection with this program, the Bank had stock at a carrying value of $281 thousand repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to no repurchases during the same period in 2010.  Any future capital stock repurchases are expected to be made on a quarterly basis if conditions warrant such repurchases.

Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment. Management's determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.

Based upon its evaluation of the foregoing criteria, management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB stock as of September 30, 2011.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$ 14,875	$ 6,645
Interest bearing demand deposits with banks	7,018	7,085
Federal funds sold	1,193	5,913
Cash and Cash Equivalents	23,086	19,643
Interest bearing time deposits	7,635	8,326
Securities available for sale	88,626	89,871
Restricted investment in bank stock	1,725	2,006
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,104 in 2011; $3,709 in 2010	407,722	384,456
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	2,080	2,398
Accrued interest receivable	1,618	1,503
Other real estate owned	3,069	3,069
Other assets	1,744	2,612
Total Assets	537,305	513,884
Liabilities:
Deposits: Non-interest bearing	35,780	32,431
Deposits: Interest bearing	412,903	382,836
Total Deposits	448,683	415,267
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased	29,774	46,433
Long-term borrowings	13,286	13,586
Accrued interest payable	652	941
Other liabilities	2,447	928
Total Liabilities	494,842	477,155
Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, $1 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; 2011 issued 7,171,551 shares; outstanding 7,171,198 shares; 2010 issued 7,157,357 shares; outstanding 7,157,004 shares	7,171	7,157
Surplus	22,872	22,303
Retained earnings	10,469	6,976
Accumulated other comprehensive income	1,954	296
Treasury stock, at cost, 353 shares	(3)	(3)
Total Stockholders' Equity	42,463	36,729
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 537,305	$ 513,884