XML 24 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
6. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases—The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating lease agreements, which expire from 2017 through 2023.

In June 2015, the Company entered into an eight-year lease with respect to office space within a building located in San Francisco, California, pursuant to which the Company leases approximately 14,067 square feet and will lease an additional approximately 42,201 square feet on June 1, 2016.

Deferred Rent—Certain of the Company’s operating leases contain rent holidays, allowances, and rent escalation provisions. For these leases, the Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease from the date the Company takes possession of the office and records the difference between amounts charged to operations and amounts paid as deferred rent. These rent holidays, allowances, and rent escalations are considered in determining the straight-line expense to be recorded over the lease term. As of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, $5.1 million and $4.9 million was recorded as deferred rent, respectively.

Rent expense, net of sublease income, for operating leases was $1.7 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $4.7 million and $3.9 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

 

Years Ending March 31,

   Operating Leases  

2016 (remaining 3 months)

   $ 1,731   

2017

     8,406   

2018

     10,251   

2019

     10,454   

2020

     10,744   

Thereafter

     22,951   
  

 

 

 

Total minimum future lease payments

   $ 64,537   
  

 

 

 

Purchase Commitments—As of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2015, the Company had purchase commitments of $3.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for specific contractual services.

Legal Proceedings—From time to time, the Company may become involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of its business, and may be subject to third-party infringement claims.

On November 5, 2012, CA, Inc. filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York for alleged patent infringement. CA, Inc.’s complaint against the Company claims that certain aspects of the Company’s products infringe certain patents held by CA, Inc. Discovery is complete in the case, and the court has ruled on summary judgment motions filed by both parties. A trial date has not been set as of December 31, 2015. The Company cannot at this time predict the likely outcome of this proceeding or estimate the amount or range of loss or possible loss that may arise from it. The Company has not accrued any loss related to the outcome of this case as of December 31, 2015.

In the normal course of business, the Company may agree to indemnify third parties with whom it enters into contractual relationships, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed, under certain conditions, to hold these third parties harmless against specified losses, such as those arising from a breach of representations or covenants, other third-party claims that the Company’s products when used for their intended purposes infringe the intellectual property rights of such other third parties, or other claims made against certain parties. To date, the Company has not incurred any costs as a result of such obligations and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company indemnifies its officers, directors, and certain key employees while they are serving in good faith in their respective capacities. The Company does not currently believe there is a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred under these indemnification obligations. To date, there have been no claims under any such indemnification provisions.