FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________________ to

Commission File Number:

Skyline Medical Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	33-1007393
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
2915 Commers Drive, Suite 900	Eagan, Minnesota 55121
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

651-389-4800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of August 6, 2015, the registrant had 3,312,863 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.

2

 SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements	4
Condensed Balance Sheets June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	4
Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014	5
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 and the six-months ended June 30, 2015	6
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014	10
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	11
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	40
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	40
Item 1A. Risk Factors	42
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	43
Item 5. Other Information	43
Item 6. Exhibits	43
Signatures	44
Exhibit Index	45

3

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements

SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Current Assets:
Cash	$	44,103		$	16,384
Accounts Receivable		15,855			57,549
Inventories		257,668			367,367
Prepaid Expense and other assets		202,591			190,015
Total Current Assets		520,217			631,315
Fixed Assets, net		147,243			196,479
Intangibles, net		77,995			73,183
Total Assets	$	745,455		$	900,977
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable		2,474,186			2,194,518
Accrued Expenses		3,474,043			3,066,379
Short-term notes payable net of discounts of $0 and $194,097 (See Note 4)		933,074			937,424
Deferred Revenue		8,375			5,000
Total Current Liabilities		6,889,678			6,203,321
Accrued Expenses		-			213,883
Total Liabilities	$	6,889,678		$	6,417,204
Commitments and Contingencies		-			-
Stockholders’ Deficit:
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, $100 Stated Value, 20,000,000 authorized, 20,550 outstanding		206			206
Common Stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 authorized, 3,312,863 and 3,092,766 outstanding		33,128			30,927
Additional paid-in capital		30,935,472			30,093,745
Accumulated Deficit		(37,113,029	)		(35,641,105	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(6,144,223	)		(5,516,227	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	745,455		$	900,977

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

4

SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited) 

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Revenue	$	234,012		$	318,293		$	385,286		$	388,513
Cost of goods sold		83,566			98,365			179,534			129,448
Gross Margin		150,446			219,928			205,752			259,065
General and administrative expense		856,219			1,330,222			728,424			2,509,504
Operations expense		151,313			291,584			172,630			556,859
Sales and marketing expense		139,026			319,303			372,983			524,223
Interest expense		189,215			14,773			342,837			32,897
Gain on valuation of equity-linked financial instruments		-			-			-			(11,469	)
Total expense		1,335,773			1,955,882			1,616,874			3,612,014
Net loss available to common shareholders	$	(1,185,327	)	$	(1,735,954	)	$	(1,411,122	)	$	(3,352,949	)
Loss per common share basic and diluted	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.58	)	$	(0.44	)	$	(1.13	)
Weighted average shares used in computation, basic and diluted		3,263,356			2,968,279			3,182,706			2,958,965

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

5

 SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

(UNAUDITED)

			Common Stock
	Preferred Stock		Shares			Amount			Paid-in Capital			Deficit			Total
Balance at 12/31/13	$	-		2,932,501		$	29,325		$	25,449,636		$	(28,697,415	)	$	(3,218,454	)
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $15.00 per share				1,728			17			1,279						1,296
Shares issued for option exercise at $1.25 per share				4,336			43			5,387						5,430
Shares issued at $20.63 per share as Investor Relations compensation				2,000			20			41,230						41,250
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $12.75 per share				3,323			33			2,460						2,493
Shares issued for an option exercise at $5.25 per share				267			3			1,397						1,400
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $.75 per share				2,174			22			1,608						1,630
Shares issued for warrant exercise at $13.50 per share				2,667			27			35,973						36,000
Shares issued at $18.75 per share as Investor Relations compensation				1,333			13			24,987						25,000
Reduction in escrow account per settlement agreement				(4,444	)		(44	)		(3,289	)					(3,333	)
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $7.50 per share				4,807			48			3,557						3,605
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $5.63 per share				3,112			31			2,302						2,333
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $12.75 per share				299			3			221						224
Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends as converted to common shares at $19.50 per share				972			10			18,909			(18,919	)		-
Vesting Expense							-			705,434						705,434
Options issued as part of employee bonus							-			694,500						694,500

6

Shares issued for combined cashless and cash warrant exercise @ $11.25 per share.		7,778	78	52,422			52,500
Issuance of Preferred stock	206		-	2,054,795			2,055,001
Shares issued to Investor Relations consultant exercisable at $11.25 per share		2,133	21	23,979			24,000
Shares issued to Investor Relations consultant exercisable at $18.75 per share		1,333	13	24,987			25,000
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $13.50 per share		3,725	37	2,757			2,794
Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends as converted to common shares at $19.50 per share		1,561	16	30,384	(30,400	)	-
Value of equity instruments issued with debt			-	313,175			313,175
Shares issued for cashless warrant exercise at $9.75 per share		1,410	14	1,044			1,058
Shares issued for a cash warrant exercise at $5.63 per share		11,111	111	62,389			62,500
Shares issued for an option exercise at $5.25 per share		333	3	1,747			1,750
Shares issued for a note conversion at $6.68 per share		3,018	30	19,970			20,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $6.68 per share		3,019	30	19,970			20,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.85 per share		3,435	34	19,966			20,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.03 per share		3,894	38	19,962			20,000
Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends as converted to common shares at $19.50 per share		1,561	16	30,385	(30,401	)	-
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.14 per share		3,894	39	19,961			20,000

7

Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.00 per share			3,997			40			19,960						20,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.26 per share			3,804			38			19,962						20,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.26 per share			5,706			57			29,943						30,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.95 per share			5,044			50			29,950						30,000
Shares issued into an escrow account per settlement agreement			13,700			137									137
Shares issued for a note conversion at $5.05 per share			55,568			556			280,060						280,616
Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends as converted to common shares at $19.50 per share			1,561			16			30,385			(30,402	)		(1	)
Shares adjusted for rounding per reverse stock split			106			1			1			-			2
Net loss						-			-			(6,833,568	)		(6,833,568	)
Balance at 12/31/2014	$	206	3,092,766		$	30,927		$	30,093,745		$	(35,641,105	)	$	(5,516,227	)
Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Adjustment as converted to common shares at $9.75 per share			3,122			31			(31	)		-			-
Reduction in escrow account per settlement agreement			(4,444	)		(44	)		(3,289	)					(3,333	)
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.90 per share			3,447			34			9,966						10,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.96 per share			6,762			68			19,932						20,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.91 per share			10,313			103			29,897						30,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.77 per share			12,098			120			33,358						33,478
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.25 per share			15,552			156			34,844						35,000

8

Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends as converted to common shares at $9.75 per share			3,121		31		30,369		(30,401	)		(1	)
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.00 per share			20,000		200		39,800					40,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.27283 per share			87,997		880		199,120					200,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.0179 per share			14,867		149		29,851					30,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $2.00 per share			15,000		150		29,850					30,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $1.92417 per share			12,993		130		24,870					25,000
Shares issued for a note conversion at $1.8578 per share			16,148		162		29,838					30,000
Shares issued to 16 shareholders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends as converted to common shares at $9.75 per share			3,121		31		30,371		(30,401	)		1
Vesting Expense					-		302,981					302,981
Net loss					-		-		(1,411,122	)		(1,411,122	)
Balance @ 6/30/2015	$	206	3,312,863	$	33,128	$	30,935,472	$	(37,113,029	)	$	(6,144,223	)

See Notes to Financial Statements

9

 SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,411,122	)	$	(3,352,949	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		39,021			25,829
Vested stock options and warrants		302,981			369,636
Equity instruments issued for management and consulting		(3,333	)		111,917
Amortization of debt discount		219,097			-
Penalty on debt provision		10,031			-
Loss on Sales of Equipment		13,102			-
(Gain) loss on valuation of equity-linked instruments		-			(11,469	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		41,694			(52,395	)
Inventories		109,699			(238,488	)
Prepaid expense and other assets		(12,576	)		(88,936	)
Accounts payable		279,669			563,224
Accrued expenses		193,781			790,158
Deferred Revenue		3,375			(64,000	)
Net cash used in operating activities:	$	(214,581	)	$	(1,947,473	)
Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchase of fixed assets		-			(72,377	)
Purchase of intangibles		(7,700	)		(14,782	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(7,700	)	$	(87,159	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term and convertible debt		250,000			125,000
Principal payments on debt		-			(300,000	)
Issuance of preferred stock		-			2,055,000
Issuance of common stock		-			92,831
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	250,000		$	1,972,831
Net increase (decrease) in cash		27,719			(61,802	)
Cash at beginning of period		16,384			101,953
Cash at end of period	$	44,103		$	40,151
Non cash transactions:
Common stock issued for accrued interest/bonus		-			694,500
Common stock issued to satisfy debt		483,478			-

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

10

 SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts presented at and for the three and six months ended June, 2015 and June, 2014 are unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations and Continuance of Operations

Skyline Medical Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota in 2002. Effective August 6, 2013, the Company changed its name to Skyline Medical Inc. As of June 30, 2015, the registrant had 3,312,863 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding. Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated effective December 16, 2013, the Company merged with and into a Delaware corporation with the same name that was its wholly-owned subsidiary, with such Delaware Corporation as the surviving corporation of the merger. The Company has developed an environmentally safe system for the collection and disposal of infectious fluids that result from surgical procedures and post-operative care. The Company also makes ongoing sales of our proprietary cleaning fluid and filters to users of our systems. In April 2009, the Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA to authorize the Company to market and sell its STREAMWAY FMS products.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a stockholders’ deficit. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. In July 2015, we filed a registration statement with the SEC in connection with a proposed public offering of a Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants (the “Units”). We continue to pursue this public offering, with the intention of listing our common stock and the Units on NASDAQ.

Since inception to June 30, 2015, the Company raised approximately $9,168,000 in equity, inclusive of $2,055,000 from a private placement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, and $5,685,000 in debt financing. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Recent Accounting Developments

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and created a new topic in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"), Topic 606. The new standard provides a single comprehensive revenue recognition framework for all entities and supersedes nearly all existing U.S. GAAP revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity should recognize revenue in a manner that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard is designed to create greater comparability for financial statement users across industries and also requires enhanced disclosures. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance may have on our financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting

Requirements. ASU 2014-10 eliminates the distinction of a development stage entity and certain related disclosure requirements, including the elimination of inception-to-date information on the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity. The amendments in ASU 2014-10 will be effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods, however early adoption is permitted. The Company evaluated and adopted ASU 2014-10 during the year 2014.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, "Compensation - Stock Compensation" providing explicit guidance on how to account for share-based payments granted to employees in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance may have on our financial statements.

We reviewed all other significant newly issued accounting pronouncements and determined they are either not applicable to our business or that no material effect is expected on our financial position and results of our operations.

11

Valuation of Intangible Assets

We review identifiable intangible assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 350 — Intangibles —Goodwill and Other, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our intangible assets are currently solely the costs of obtaining trademarks and patents. Events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, a significant change in the medical device marketplace and a significant adverse change in the business climate in which we operate. If such events or changes in circumstances are present, the undiscounted cash flows method is used to determine whether the intangible asset is impaired. Cash flows would include the estimated terminal value of the asset and exclude any interest charges. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the asset, the asset is considered impaired, and the impairment is measured by reducing the carrying value of the asset to its fair value using the discounted cash flows method. The discount rate utilized is based on management’s best estimate of the related risks and return at the time the impairment assessment is made.

12

Accounting Policies and Estimates

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Presentation of Taxes Collected from Customers

Sales taxes are imposed on the Company’s sales to nonexempt customers. The Company collects the taxes from customers and remits the entire amounts to the governmental authorities. The Company’s accounting policy is to exclude the taxes collected and remitted from revenues and expenses.

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and handling charges billed to customers are recorded as revenue. Shipping and handling costs are recorded within cost of goods sold on the statement of operations.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses were $500 and $1,417 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and were $1,250 and $7,793 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. Research and development expenses were $58,285 and $120,947 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and were $131,285 and $249,636 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 Revenue Recognition and ASC 605-Revenue Recognition.

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is probable. Delivery is considered to have occurred upon either shipment of the product or arrival at its destination based on the shipping terms of the transaction. The Company’s standard terms specify that shipment is FOB Skyline and the Company will, therefore, recognize revenue upon shipment in most cases. This revenue recognition policy applies to shipments of the STREAMWAY FMS units as well as shipments of cleaning solution kits. When these conditions are satisfied, the Company recognizes gross product revenue, which is the price it charges generally to its customers for a particular product. Under the Company’s standard terms and conditions, there is no provision for installation or acceptance of the product to take place prior to the obligation of the customer. The customer’s right of return is limited only to the Company’s standard one-year warranty whereby the Company replaces or repairs, at its option, and it would be rare that the STREAMWAY FMS unit or significant quantities of cleaning solution kits may be returned. Additionally, since the Company buys both the STREAMWAY FMS units and cleaning solution kits from “turnkey” suppliers, the Company would have the right to replacements from the suppliers if this situation should occur.

Receivables

Receivables are reported at the amount the Company expects to collect on balances outstanding. The Company provides for probable uncollectible amounts through charges to earnings and credits to the valuation based on management’s assessment of the current status of individual accounts, changes to the valuation allowance have not been material to the financial statements.

13

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory balances are as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
Finished goods	$	46,845	$	88,362
Raw materials		200,654		237,556
Work-In-Process		10,169		41,449
Total	$	257,668	$	367,367

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful asset life by classification is as follows:

	Years
Computers and office equipment	3 - 7
Leasehold improvements	5
Manufacturing tooling	3 - 7
Demo Equipment	3

The Company’s investment in Fixed Assets consists of the following:

	June 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
Computers and office equipment	$	122,889	$	123,708
Leasehold improvements		23,874		23,874
Manufacturing tooling		97,288		97,288
Demo Equipment		13,706		30,576
Total		257,757		275,446
Less: Accumulated depreciation		110,514		78,967
Total Fixed Assets, Net	$	147,243	$	196,479

Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of trademarks and patent costs. Amortization expense was $1,444 and $2,888 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, and was $0 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The assets are reviewed for impairment annually, and impairment losses, if any, are charged to operations when identified.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740- Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss and credit carryforwards using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to impact taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

The Company reviews income tax positions expected to be taken in income tax returns to determine if there are any income tax uncertainties. The Company recognizes tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on technical merits of the positions. The Company has identified no income tax uncertainties.

Tax years subsequent to 2011 remain open to examination by federal and state tax authorities.

14

Patents and Intellectual Property

On January 25th, 2014 the Company filed a non-provisional PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/013081 claiming priority from the U.S. Provisional Patent Application, number 61756763 which was filed one year earlier on January 25th, 2013. The Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) allows an applicant to file a single patent application to seek patent protection for an invention simultaneously in each of the 148 countries of the PCT, including the United States. By filing this single “international” patent application through the PCT, it is easier and more cost effective than filing separate applications directly with each national or regional patent office in which patent protection is desired.

Our PCT patent application is for the new model of the surgical fluid waste management system. We obtained a favorable International Search Report from the PCT searching authority indicating that the claims in our PCT application are patentable (i.e., novel and non-obvious) over the cited prior art. A feature claimed in the PCT application is the ability to maintain continuous suction to the surgical field while measuring, recording and evacuating fluid to the facilities sewer drainage system. This provides for continuous operation of the STREAMWAY System unit in suctioning waste fluids, which means that suction is not interrupted during a surgical operation, for example, to empty a fluid collection container or otherwise dispose of the collected fluid.

The Company holds the following granted patents in the United States and a pending application in the United States on its earlier models: US7469727, US8123731 and U.S. Publication No. US20090216205 (collectively, the “Patents”). These Patents will begin to expire on August 8, 2023.

Subsequent Events

As described in Note 3 below, on July 24, 2015, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation, pursuant to which the authorized common stock was increased to 100,000,000 shares of common stock and the authorized preferred stock was increased to 20,000,000 shares.

On February 4, 2014, the Company raised $2,055,000 in gross proceeds from a private placement of 20,550 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, with a stated value of $100 per share (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) and warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock.  In connection with the Company’s proposed offering of 1,666,667 units (the “Units”), each consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, one share of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and four of the Company’s Series A Warrants, the holders of a majority of the Series A Preferred Shares have, as of July 20, 2015, agreed to exchange all of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for units with the same terms as the Units (the “Exchange Units”) such that for every dollar of stated value of Series A Preferred Shares tendered the holders will receive an equivalent value of Exchange Units based on the public offering price of the Units in this offering (the “Unit Exchange”).  Accordingly, assuming the public offering price for the Units is $9.00 per Unit, then all of the Series A Preferred Shares will be exchanged into 228,334 Exchange Units. The warrants that were issued in connection with the issuance of the Series A Preferred Shares will remain outstanding; however, the warrant amounts will be reduced so that the warrants will be exercisable into an aggregate of 84,770 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Unit Exchange is subject to and will be consummated currently with the consummation of the Company’s offering of Units. Each holder of Series A Preferred Shares that has agreed to the terms of the Unit Exchange has entered into the Exchange Agreement with the Company.  Upon effectiveness of the Unit Exchange, the Series A Preferred Shares will be cancelled and resume the status of authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock.

From July through September 2014, the Company entered into a series of securities purchase agreements pursuant to which the Company issued approximately $1.8 million original principal amount of convertible promissory notes (the “2014 Convertible Notes”) and warrants exercisable for shares of the Company’s common stock. The original principal amount of the 2014 Convertible Notes was subsequently reduced to approximately $1.6 million in accordance with their terms.  In April and May 2015, the Company issued and sold to Magna Equities II, LLC additional Convertible Notes in an aggregate original principal amount of $275,000 containing terms substantially similar to the 2014 Convertible Notes (the “2015 Convertible Notes” and, together with the 2014 Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”).  As of June 30, 2015, $927,663 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereto, has been converted into shares of the Company’s common stock and $933,073 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes remains outstanding. In connection with the Company’s proposed offering of Units, the holders of the Convertible Notes have agreed to not exercise their right to convert the Convertible Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock, in exchange for the Company’s agreement to redeem all of the outstanding Convertible Notes promptly following the consummation of the Company’s offering of Units at a redemption price equal to 140% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company estimates that the total redemption price to redeem all outstanding Convertible Notes will be approximately $1.4 million. Of this amount, approximately $167,031 will be paid to its affiliates in redemption of their Convertible Notes.  Each holder of the Convertible Notes that has agreed to the foregoing terms has entered into an Amendment to Senior Convertible Notes and Agreement with the Company.

15

Interim Financial Statements

The Company has prepared the unaudited interim financial statements and related unaudited financial information in the footnotes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements. These interim financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the interim periods. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and the notes thereto contained in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 30, 2015. The nature of the Company’s business is such that the results of any interim period may not be indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

NOTE 2 – DEVELOPMENT STAGE OPERATIONS

The Company was formed April 23, 2002. Since inception to July 30, 2015, 3,312,863 shares of common stock have been issued between par value and $125.25. Operations since incorporation have been devoted to raising capital, obtaining financing, development of the Company’s product, and administrative services, customer acceptance and sales and marketing strategies.

NOTE 3 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT, STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

The Company has an equity incentive plan, which allows issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options to employees, directors and consultants of the Company, where permitted under the plan. The exercise price for each stock option is determined by the Board of Directors. Vesting requirements are determined by the Board of Directors when granted and currently range from immediate to three years. Options under this plan have terms ranging from three to ten years.

16

On February 4, 2014, (the “Closing Date”) we raised $2,055,000 in gross proceeds from a private placement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 (the “Preferred Shares”) pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors (the Purchasers”) purchased 20,550 Preferred Shares, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to acquire an aggregate of approximately 21,334 shares of Common Stock. The Preferred Shares are convertible into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $19.50 per share of Common Stock. The Warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $24.38 per share and expire five years from the Closing Date. If the Common Stock is not listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE MKT within 180 days of the Closing, the Company was required to issue additional Warrants to purchase additional shares of Common Stock, equal to 30% of the shares of Common Stock which the Preferred Shares each Purchaser purchased are convertible into. As of August 4, 2014, the Company issued additional warrants to purchase 61,539 shares to the Purchasers in connection with this provision.

The Securities Purchase Agreement requires the Company to register the resale of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Preferred Shares (the “Underlying Shares”) and the Common Stock underlying the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”). On September 9, 2014, a resale registration statement covering the Underlying Shares, the Warrant Shares and certain other securities (the “Resale Registration Statement”) was declared effective.

The Preferred Shares are convertible at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value of the Preferred Shares being converted by the conversion price of $19.50, subject to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits and similar recapitalization events. If the Company issues additional shares of Common Stock, other than certain stock that is excluded under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, in one or more capital raising transactions with an aggregate purchase price of at least $100,000 for a price less than the then existing conversion price for the Preferred Shares (the “New Issuance Price”), then the then existing conversion price shall be reduced to the New Issuance Price, provided, however, that under no circumstances shall the New Issuance Price be less than $9.75 or reduced to a price level that would be in breach of the listing rules of any stock exchange or that would have material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to list its Common Stock on a stock exchange, including but not limited to the change of accounting treatment of the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Shares contain certain limitations on conversion so that the holder will not own more than 4.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Preferred Shares held by the applicable holder, with the percentage subject to increase in certain circumstances. The Preferred Shares are eligible to vote with the Common Stock on an as-converted basis, but only to the extent that the Preferred Shares are eligible for conversion without exceeding the Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The Preferred Shares are entitled to receive dividends on a pari passu basis with the Common Stock, when, and if declared. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary (a “Liquidation”), after the satisfaction in full of the debts of the Company and the payment of any liquidation preference owed to the holders of shares of Common Stock ranking prior to the Preferred Shares upon liquidation, the holders of the Preferred Shares shall receive, prior and in preference to the holders of any junior securities, an amount equal to $2,055,000 times 1.2, plus all declared but unpaid dividends.

The Warrants are exercisable on any day on or after the date of issuance, have an adjusted exercise price of $9.75 per share, subject to possible further adjustment, and a term of five years from the date they are first exercisable. However, a holder will be prohibited from exercising a Warrant if, as a result of such exercise, the holder, together with its affiliates, would exceed the Beneficial Ownership Limitation as described above for the Preferred Shares. If any Warrant has not been fully exercised prior to the first anniversary of the Closing and if during such period the Company has not installed or received firm purchase orders (accepted by the Company) for at least 500 STREAMWAY ® Automated Surgical Fluid Disposal Systems, then, the number of shares of Common Stock for which such Warrant may be exercised shall be increased to 2.5 times the previous amount. In January 2015, the number of shares of Common Stock for which each Warrant may be exercised was increased according to this provision. As described in Note 1 under “Subsequent Events”, the Company and the holders of the Preferred Shares have agreed to the exchange of the Preferred Shares for certain units, with an agreed-upon reduction in the number of shares for which each Warrant may be exercised.

In addition, in July, August and September 2014, the Company issued 71,257 warrants to investors in convertible notes as further described below.

Accounting for share-based payment

The Company has adopted ASC 718- Compensation-Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). Under ASC 718 stock-based employee compensation cost is recognized using the fair value based method for all new awards granted after January 1, 2006 and unvested awards outstanding at January 1, 2006. Compensation costs for unvested stock options and non-vested awards that were outstanding at January 1, 2006, are being recognized over the requisite service period based on the grant-date fair value of those options and awards, using a straight-line method. We elected the modified-prospective method under which prior periods are not retroactively restated.

17

ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model or other acceptable means. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period of time employees will retain vested stock options before exercising them, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock price over the expected term, the number of options that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements, the expected dividend rate and the risk-free interest rate. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognized. The assumptions the Company uses in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent the Company's best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company's equity-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Since the Company's common stock has no significant public trading history, and the Company has experienced no significant option exercises in its history, the Company is required to take an alternative approach to estimating future volatility and estimated life and the future results could vary significantly from the Company's estimates. The Company compiled historical volatilities over a period of 2 to 7 years of 15 small-cap medical companies traded on major exchanges and 10 mid-range medical companies on the OTC Bulletin Board and combined the results using a weighted average approach. In the case of ordinary options to employees the Company determined the expected life to be the midpoint between the vesting term and the legal term. In the case of options or warrants granted to non-employees, the Company estimated the life to be the legal term unless there was a compelling reason to make it shorter.

When an option or warrant is granted in place of cash compensation for services, the Company deems the value of the service rendered to be the value of the option or warrant. In most cases, however, an option or warrant is granted in addition to other forms of compensation and its separate value is difficult to determine without utilizing an option pricing model. For that reason the Company also uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value options and warrants granted to non-employees, which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period the investors or consultants will retain vested stock options and warrants before exercising them, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock price over the expected term, the number of options and warrants that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements, the expected dividend rate and the risk-free interest rate. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based consulting and/or compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognized.

Since the Company has limited trading history in its stock and no first-hand experience with how its investors and consultants have acted in similar circumstances, the assumptions the Company uses in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent its best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company's equity-based consulting and interest expense could be materially different in the future.

Valuation and accounting for options and warrants

The Company determines the grant date fair value of options and warrants using a Black-Scholes option valuation model based upon assumptions regarding risk-free interest rate, expected dividend rate, volatility and estimated term.

18

In January 2014 the Company issued 4,336 shares of common stock to the former CEO at $1.25 per share upon his exercising options.

In January through March 2014, 9 warrant holders exercised warrants through a cashless exercise for a total of 15,442 shares of common stock.

In January and February 2014 the Company issued warrants to purchase 21,538 shares pursuant to a February 4, 2014 private placement whereby the Company issued 20,550 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock raising gross proceeds of $2,055,000. The warrants are at an exercise price of $24.38.

In February 2014 the Company issued a warrant to purchase 1,482 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $20.25 to a major shareholder Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz. The warrant is in consideration for a bridge loan extended in December 2013 that has been paid in February 2014.

On March 31, 2014, the Company issued dividends to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares as described above. The dividends are at an annual rate of 6% of the stated value of the Preferred Shares paid on a quarterly basis in the form of common stock per a stipulated $19.50 per share. As a result 970 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

In March 2014, the Company issued 4,444 shares of common stock to a warrant holder for a partial cash exercise at $11.25 per share; issued 3,333 shares to the holder via the cashless exercise of the remainder of the warrant.

In June 2014, the Company issued 3,725 shares of common stock to a warrant holder exercising cashless warrants.

On June 30, 2014, the Company issued dividends to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares as described above. The dividends are at an annual rate of 6% of the stated value of the Preferred Shares paid on a quarterly basis in the form of common stock per a stipulated $19.50 per share. As a result 1,561 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

On June 30, 2014, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 5,431 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.38 to SOK Partners, LLC, in consideration for a bridge loan in the form of convertible notes. On September 9, 2014 the Resale Registration Statement went into effect. The convertible note agreement provided an immediate approximately 11% reduction to the warrant agreement. Therefore, the warrant has been adjusted to purchase 4,831 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.38 to SOK Partners, LLC in consideration for a bridge loan.

In July 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase 28,986 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.38 to two lenders in consideration for a bridge loan in the form of convertible notes. The shares above reflect approximately an 11% reduction resulting from the Resale Registration Statement that went effective September 9, 2014.

In August 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase 61,539 of common stock at an exercise price of $24.38 to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares. The Securities Purchase Agreement with the Preferred Shareholders stipulated that if the Company was not listed on either the NASDAQ Stock Market, the New York Stock Exchange or the NYSE MKT within 180 days of closing the agreement then warrants to purchase the above additional shares would be issued in aggregate to the Preferred Shareholders.

In August and September 2014, the Company issued warrants to purchase 37,440 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.38 to four lenders in consideration for a bridge loan in the form of convertible notes. The shares above reflect the approximate 11% reduction resulting from the Resale Registration Statement that went effective September 9, 2014.

On September 30, 2014, the Company issued dividends to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares as described above. The dividends are at an annual rate of 6% of the stated value of the Preferred Shares paid on a quarterly basis in the form of common stock per a stipulated $19.50 per share. As a result 1,561 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

In November 2014, the Company issued 13,700 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, in escrow for debt settlement.

On December 31, 2014, the Company issued dividends to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares as described above. The dividends are at an annual rate of 6% of the stated value of the Preferred Shares paid on a quarterly basis in the form of common stock per a stipulated $19.50 per share. As a result 1,559 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

For grants of stock options and warrants in 2014 the Company used a 1.44% to 2.75% risk-free interest rate, 0% dividend rate, 59% to 66% volatility and estimated terms of 5 to 10 years. Value computed using these assumptions ranged from $3.2006 to $13.9195 per share.

In January 2015, the Company issued a dividend adjustment to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares as described above. Certain previous dividends paid were calculated with an exercise price of $19.50 per share, but should have been calculated at $9.75 per share. As a result 3,122 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

19

On March 31, 2015, the Company issued dividends to the Purchasers of the Preferred Shares as described above. The dividends are at an annual rate of 6% of the stated value of the Preferred Shares paid on a quarterly basis in the form of common stock per a stipulated $9.75 per share. As a result 3,121 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

On June 30, 2015, the Company issued dividends to Purchases of the Preferred Shares as described above. The dividends are at an annual rate of 6% of the stated value of the Preferred Shares paid on a quarterly basis in the form of common stock per a stipulated $9.75 per share. As a result 3,121 shares of common stock were issued to 16 holders of Preferred Shares.

For grants of stock options and warrants in 2015 the Company used a 1.63% to 2.35% risk-free interest rate, 0% dividend rate, 59% to 66% volatility and estimated terms of 5 to 10 years. Value computed using these assumptions ranged from $0.2750 to $5.5695 per share.

20

The following summarizes transactions for stock options and warrants for the periods indicated:

	Stock Options					Warrants
				Average					Average
	Number of			Exercise		Number of			Exercise
	Shares			Price		Shares			Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		385,733		$	6.75		461,920		$	10.50
Issued		75,683			8.12		161,375			3.81
Expired		(7,879	)		23.58		(81,851	)		13.54
Exercised		(4,936	)		1.76		(40,722	)		8.38
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		448,601		$	7.51		500,722		$	7.95
Issued		66,926			3.14		126,310			13.49
Expired		(7,136)			13.55		(1,567)			14.04
Exercised		-			-		-			-
Outstanding at June 30, 2015		508,391		$	6.96		625,465		$	9.06

At June 30, 2015, 501,723 stock options are fully vested and currently exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $6.31 and a weighted average remaining term of 6.43 years. All warrants are fully vested and exercisable. Stock-based compensation recognized for the six months ending June 2015 and June 2014 was $302,981 and $352,762, respectively. The Company has $72,354 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 9 months.

21

The following summarizes the status of options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2015:

Range of Prices			Shares		Weighted Remaining Life
Options
	$	0.75		7,333		6.02
	$	3.10		59,681		10.00
	$	3.45		7,245		9.76
	$	4.875		134		7.70
	$	5.25		2,031		7.19
	$	5.625		192,000		7.71
	$	5.925		23,206		7.72
	$	6.00		123,998		7.13
	$	6.50		3,845		9.51
	$	6.60		5,332		6.57
	$	8.25		3,636		9.26
	$	9.9375		3,019		8.04
	$	10.50		3,238		8.04
	$	11.25		13,666		7.60
	$	12.75		3,401		8.29
	$	13.875		2,160		8.76
	$	15.00		3,334		8.72
	$	17.25		40,261		8.69
	$	18.75		3,334		8.65
	$	20.25		4,940		8.51
	$	21.75		1,336		8.28
	$	23.85		1,260		8.26
				508,391
Warrants
	$	0.75		400		0.44
	$	6.00		102,857		2.71
	$	9.00		2,666		2.58
	$	9.75		155,545		4.10
	$	11.25		203,801		2.52
	$	12.375		71,257		4.11
	$	12.38		5,557		4.36
	$	13.50		4,444		2.97
	$	14.85		23,612		2.92
	$	20.25		1,481		3.63
	$	24.375		53,845		3.60
				625,465

Stock options and warrants expire on various dates from December 2015 to June 2025.

22

The shareholders approved an increase in authorized shares to 1,066,067 shares in an annual shareholder meeting held on June 22, 2010 and approved an increase in authorized shares to 2,666,667 shares in a special shareholder meeting held on September 7, 2011.

The shareholders approved an increase in authorized shares to 4,000,000 shares in a special shareholder meeting held on January 15, 2013.

The shareholders approved an amendment of the Company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the reserve of shares authorized for issuance to 666,667 shares and to increase the threshold of limitation on certain grants to 266,667 shares on April 15, 2013.

An increase from 4,000,000 to 10,666,667 authorized shares, and an amendment of the Company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the reserve of shares authorized for issuance to 1,333,334 shares was approved at the September 10, 2013 annual meeting.

On July 24, 2015, an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation became effective, pursuant to which the authorized common stock was to 100,000,000 shares of common stock and the authorized preferred stock was increased to 20,000,000 shares.

Stock Options and Warrants Granted by the Company

The following table is the listing of stock options and warrants as of June 30, 2015 by year of grant:

Stock Options:
Year	Shares		Price
2011		11,666	$	0.75
2012		126,029		5.25 - 6.00
2013		238,088		4.875 - 23.85
2014		65,681		6.50 – 18.75
2015		66,926		3.10 - 3.45
Total		508,391	$	.75 - 25.613

Warrants:
Year	Shares		Price
2010		400		0.75
2011		-		-
2012		69,801		11.25
2013		267,579		6.00- 14.85
2014		161,375		12.375 – 24.375
2015		126,310	$	9.75 – 24.375
Total		625,465	$	0.75 - 24.375

23

NOTE 4 – SHORT-TERM NOTES PAYABLE

From July through September 2014, we entered into a series of securities purchase agreements pursuant to which we issued approximately $1.8 million original principal amount (subsequently reduced to approximately $1.6 million aggregate principal amount in accordance with their terms) of convertible promissory notes (the “2014 Convertible Notes”) and warrants exercisable for shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,475,000. Of this amount, we issued to SOK Partners, LLC, an affiliate of the Company, $122,196 original principal amount of the 2014 Convertible Notes and warrants exercisable for 5,431 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000. In April and May 2015, we issued and sold to a private investor additional Convertible Notes in an aggregate original principal amount of $275,000 for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, containing terms substantially similar to the 2014 Convertible Notes (the “2015 Convertible Notes” and, together with the 2014 Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”). No warrants were issued with the 2015 Convertible Notes.

Under a provision in the existing agreements, upon effectiveness of a resale registration statement covering certain shares, on September 9, 2014, the principal amount of the notes was reduced by 11%, to $1,603,260 and the number of Warrants was reduced by 11%, to 71,257 shares.

As of June 30, 2015, $927,663 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereto, have been converted into shares of our common stock and $933,073 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes remains outstanding.

As described in Note 1 under “Subsequent Events”, in connection with the Company’s proposed offering of Units, the holders of the Convertible Notes have agreed to not exercise their right to convert the Convertible Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock, in exchange for the Company’s agreement to redeem all of the outstanding Convertible Notes promptly following the consummation of the Company’s offering of Units at a redemption price equal to 140% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company estimates that the total redemption price to redeem all outstanding Convertible Notes will be approximately $1.4 million. Of this amount, approximately $167,031 will be paid to its affiliates in redemption of their Convertible Notes.  Each holder of the Convertible Notes that has agreed to the foregoing terms has entered into an Amendment to Senior Convertible Notes and Agreement with the Company.

NOTE 5 - LOSS PER SHARE

The following table presents the shares used in the basic and diluted loss per common share computations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Numerator:
Net loss available in basic and diluted calculation	$	(1,185,327	)	$	(1,735,954	)	$	(1,411,122	)	$	(3,352,949	)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic		3,263,356			2,968,279			3,182,706			2,958,965
Effect of diluted stock options and warrants (1)		-			-			-			-
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic		3,263,356			2,968,279			3,182,706			2,958,965
Loss per common share basic and diluted	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.58	)	$	(0.44	)	$	(1.13	)

(1) The number of shares underlying options and warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 are 1,133,856 and 847,848 respectively. The effect of the shares that would be issued upon exercise of such options and warrants has been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because those shares are anti-dilutive.

24

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes consists of an amount for taxes currently payable and a provision for tax consequences deferred to future periods.  Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

There is no income tax provision in the accompanying statements of operations due to the cumulative operating losses that indicate a 100% valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets and state income taxes is appropriate.

During September 2013, the Company experienced an "ownership change" as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code which could potentially limit the ability to utilize the Company’s net operating losses (NOLs). The general limitation rules allow the Company to utilize its NOLs subject to an annual limitation that is determined by multiplying the federal long-term tax-exempt rate by the Company’s value immediately before the ownership change.

At June 30, 2015, the Company had approximately $19.9 million of gross NOLs to reduce future federal taxable income, the majority of which are expected to be available for use in 2015, subject to the Section 382 limitation described above. The federal NOLs will expire beginning in 2022 if unused. The Company also had approximately $12.6 million of gross NOLs to reduce future state taxable income at December 31, 2014, which will expire in years 2022 through 2034 if unused. The Company's net deferred tax assets, which include the NOLs, are subject to a full valuation allowance. At December 31, 2014, the federal and state valuation allowances were $8.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

The valuation allowance has been recorded due to the uncertainty of realization of the benefits associated with the net operating losses. Future events and changes in circumstances could cause this valuation allowance to change.

The components of deferred income taxes at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
Deferred Tax Asset:
Net Operating Loss	$	7,919,000	$	7,919,000
Other		1,150,000		1,150,000
Total Deferred Tax Asset		9,069,000		9,069,000
Less Valuation Allowance		9,069,000		9,069,000
Net Deferred Income Taxes	$	—	$	—

25

NOTE 7 – RENT OBLIGATION

The Company leases its principal office under a lease that can be cancelled after three years with proper notice per the lease and an amortized schedule of adjustments that will be due to the landlord. The lease extends five years and expires January 2018. In addition to rent, the Company pays real estate taxes and repairs and maintenance on the leased property. Rent expense was $15,823 and $34,256 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and was $15,447 and $33,056 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 respectively.

The Company’s rent obligation for the next five years is as follows:

2015	$	18,500
2016	$	38,000
2017	$	39,000
2018	$	3,600
2019	$	-

NOTE 8 – LIABILITY FOR EQUITY-LINKED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company adopted ASC 815- Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) on January 1, 2009. ASC 815 mandates a two-step process for evaluating whether an equity-linked financial instrument or embedded feature is indexed to the entity's own stock. It was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which was the Company's first quarter of 2009. Many of the warrants issued by the Company contain a strike price adjustment feature, which upon adoption of ASC 815, changed the classification (from equity to liability) and the related accounting for warrants with a $479,910 estimated fair value of as of January 1, 2009. An adjustment was made to remove $486,564 from paid-in capital (the cumulative values of the warrants on their grant dates), a positive adjustment of $6,654 was made to accumulated deficit, representing the gain on valuation from the grant date to January 1, 2009, and $479,910 was booked as a liability. The warrants issued in 2011 do not contain a strike price adjustment feature and, therefore, are not treated as a liability.

The January 1, 2009 valuation was computed using the Black-Scholes valuation model based upon a 2.5-year expected term, an expected volatility of 63%, an exercise price of $34.50 per share, a stock price of $26.25, a zero dividend rate and a 1.37% risk free interest rate. Subsequent to January 1, 2009 these warrants were re-valued at the end of each quarter and a gain or loss was recorded based upon their increase or decrease in value during the quarter. Likewise, new warrants that were issued during 2009 and 2010 were valued, using the Black-Scholes valuation model on their date of grant and an entry was made to reduce paid-in capital and increase the liability for equity-linked financial instruments. These warrants were also re-valued at the end of each quarter based upon their expected life, the stock price, the exercise price, assumed dividend rate, expected volatility and risk free interest rate. A significant reduction in the liability was realized in 2010 primarily due to a reduction from $37.50 to $16.50 per share in the underlying stock price. The Company realized a slight increase in the liability for existing warrants during the first quarter of 2012. In 2013 there was a significant decrease in the liability primarily due to current expirations and the amount of warrants reaching expiration in the near term. In 2014, all warrants expired and the liability was reduced to zero.

26

The inputs to the Black-Scholes model during 2009 through 2014 were as follows:

Stock price	$ 3.75 to $37.50
Exercise price	$ .75 to $25.613
Expected life	2.0 to 6.5 years
Expected volatility	59%
Assumed dividend rate	- %
Risk-free interest rate	.13% to 2.97%

The original valuations, annual gain/(loss) and end of year valuations are shown below:

	Initial Value		Annual Gain (Loss)			Value at 12/31/09		2010 Gain (Loss)		Value at 12/31/10		2011 Gain (Loss)			Value at 12/31/2011		2012 Gain (Loss)			Value at12/31/2012		2013 Gain (Loss)		Value at12/31/2013		2014 Gain (Loss)		Value at 12/31/2014
January 1, 2009 adoption	$	479,910	$	(390,368	)	$	870,278	$	868,772	$	1,506	$	(88,290	)	$	89,796	$	(21,856	)	$	111,652	$	100,053	$	11,599	$	11,599	$	-
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2009		169,854		20,847			149,007		147,403		1,604		(4,689	)		6,293		6,293			-		-		-		-		-
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2009		39,743		(738	)		40,481		40,419		62		(1,562	)		1,624		910			714		714		-		-		-
Warrants issued in quarter ended 12/31/2009		12,698		617			12,081		12,053		28		(724	)		752		415			337		337		-		-		-
Subtotal		702,205					1,071,847
Warrants issued in quarter ended 3/31/2010		25,553							25,014		539		(5,570	)		6,109		3,701			2,408		2,408		-		-		-
Warrants issued in quarter ended 6/30/2010		31,332							30,740		592		(6,122	)		6,714		6,083			631		631		-		-		-
Warrants issued in quarter ended 9/30/2010		31,506							20,891		10,615		(44,160	)		54,775		1,338			53,437		53,437		-		-		-
Total	$	790,596	$	(369,642	)	$	1,071,847	$	1,145,292	$	14,946	$	(151,117	)	$	166,063	$	(3,116	)	$	169,179	$	157,580	$	11,599	$	11,599	$	-

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Audit Committee has the responsibility to review and approve all transactions to which a related party and the Company may be a party prior to their implementation, to assess whether such transactions meet applicable legal requirements. Rick Koenigsberger, a director, is a holder of membership units in SOK Partners. 

Convertible Note Issuances to Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz and SOK Partners, LLC

On September 11, 2013, both the Herschkowitz Note and the SOK Note (each as defined below in this Note 9) were converted in full by the holders thereof at $0.014 per share. The principal and interest balance of the Herschkowitz Note of $314,484 was converted into 299,509 shares of common stock. The principal and interest balance of the SOK Note of $680,444 was converted into 648,050 shares of common stock. The collateral that secured these notes was released back to the Company.

The remaining disclosure of this Note 9 provides historical information regarding the Herschkowitz Note, the SOK Note and certain other convertible note issuances.

On March 28, 2012, the Company, entered into a Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2012 (the “SOK Purchase Agreement”) with SOK Partners, LLC (“SOK Partners”), and an investment partnership. Josh Kornberg, who is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and interim Chairman of the Board, and Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz are affiliates of the manager of SOK Partners and Ricardo Koenigsberger, a director, is a holder of membership units of SOK Partners. Pursuant to the SOK Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a 20.0% convertible note due August 2012 in the principal amount of up to $600,000. Principal and accrued interest on the note is due and payable on August 28, 2012. The Company’s obligations under the note are secured by the grant of a security interest in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. The SOK Purchase Agreement and the note included customary events of default that include, among other things, non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, cross-defaults to other indebtedness and bankruptcy and insolvency defaults. The occurrence of an event of default would have resulted in the acceleration of the Company’s obligations under the note, and interest rate of twenty-four (24%) percent per annum accrues if the note had not been paid when due.

27

On March 28, 2012, the Company received an advance of $84,657 under the note, including a cash advance of $60,000 net of a prepayment of interest on the first $300,000 in advances under the note. The holder of the note was entitled to convert the note into shares of common stock of the Company at an initial conversion price per share of $4.88 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of (1) certain issuances of common stock or convertible securities at a price lower than the conversion price of the note, and (2) recapitalizations, stock splits, reorganizations and similar events. In addition, the Company is required to issue two installments of an equity bonus to SOK Partners in the form of common stock valued at the rate of $4.88 per share. In March 2012, the Company issued the first equity bonus to SOK Partners, consisting of 61,539 shares of common stock, with a second installment due within five business days after SOK Partners has made aggregate advances under the note of at least $300,000. In May 2012 the Company issued the second installment consisting of 61,539 shares of common stock subsequent to SOK Partners surpassing the aggregate advances of $300,000. Until the maturity date of the note, if the Company obtained financing from any other source without the consent of SOK Partners, then the Company is required to issue additional bonus equity in an amount equal to $600,000 less the aggregate advances on the note made prior to the breach. The principal balance of the SOK Note was $357,282 as of December 31, 2012.

As long as any amount payable under the SOK Note remained outstanding, SOK Partners or its designee were entitled to appoint a new member to the Company’s Board of Directors, to be appointed upon request. Ricardo Koenigsberger was appointed to the Board by SOK Partners on June 25, 2012.

On March 28, 2012, the Company signed an Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2011, with Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz (as amended, the “Herschkowitz Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Herschkowitz Purchase Agreement, the Company issued a 20.0% convertible note due June 20, 2012 in the principal amount of $240,000 for previous advances under the note. The Company’s obligations under the note were secured by the grant of a security interest in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. The Company has previously issued to Dr. Herschkowitz an equity bonus consisting of 20,623 shares of common stock. An additional 100,000 shares were transferred to Dr. Herschkowitz effective in April 2012, upon the occurrence of an event of default on the note. On August 13, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement and forbearance agreement described below, relating to the defaults under the Herschkowitz Note and other matters.

As long as any amount payable under the Herschkowitz Note remained outstanding, Dr. Herschkowitz or his designee was entitled to appoint a special advisor to the Company’s Board of Directors, to be appointed as a member of the Board upon request. Pursuant to this authority, Josh Kornberg was appointed to the Board on March 9, 2012. In addition, pursuant to this authority, Mr. Koenigsberger was appointed to the Board on June 25, 2012.

Pursuant to a letter dated April 20, 2012, Dr. Herschkowitz advised the Company of the occurrence of numerous events of default under the terms of the Herschkowitz Note and the Herschkowitz Note Purchase Agreement. As a result of such events of default, Dr. Herschkowitz asserted significant rights as a secured creditor of the Company, including his rights as a secured creditor with a security interest in substantially all assets of the Company. Without a settlement relating to the defaults and other matters, Dr. Herschkowitz could have taken action to levy upon the Company’s assets, including patents and other intellectual property.

In addition, the Company and Atlantic Partners Alliance LLC (“APA”) were parties to a letter agreement dated March 14, 2012, providing APA and its affiliates (including Dr. Herschkowitz and SOK) with rights to avoid dilution relating to additional issuances of equity securities by the Company through July 14, 2012, evidencing the parties’ intent that APA would be provided with significant protection against dilution. This protection was in recognition of APA’s investments in the Company involving a high degree of risk and the Company’s contemplated need for restructuring its indebtedness, which were anticipated to result, and have resulted, in significant dilution. The parties acknowledged that Dr. Herschkowitz and SOK would not have made their historical cash investments in the Company to the same degree had the dilution protection not been provided, and the investments by these parties have enabled the Company to avoid insolvency. Since the respective dates of the Herschkowitz Note Purchase Agreement and the SOK Note Purchase Agreement, the Company has issued in excess of 213,334 shares of common stock to parties other than APA and its affiliates, resulting in significant dilution.

Effective August 15, 2012, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Dr. Herschkowitz, APA and SOK (the “Forbearance Agreement”). Under the Forbearance Agreement, among other things, (i) Dr. Herschkowitz agreed to forbear from asserting his rights as a secured creditor to substantially all of the Company’s assets, resulting from the Company’s defaults; (ii) the Company issued an aggregate 353,334 shares of common stock to Dr. Herschkowitz and SOK and adjusted the conversion price of their convertible notes to $1.05 per share from $4.88 per share, to satisfy the Company’s obligations to adjust for dilution under the March 14, 2012 letter agreement; (iii) Dr. Herschkowitz and SOK agreed to extend the maturity of their notes to December 31, 2012; (iv) the Company agreed to pay certain compensation to Dr. Herschkowitz upon the achievement of financial milestones; and (v) Dr. Herschkowitz clarified and waived certain of his rights, including the right to interest at a penalty rate upon default.

In the Forbearance Agreement, Dr. Herschkowitz agreed to forbear from exercising any of his rights arising under the Herschkowitz Note or the Herschkowitz Note Purchase Agreement with respect to the existing defaults against the Company, subject to the limitations set forth in the letter agreement and without releasing or waiving any future breach of the letter agreement. He further agreed to forbear from exercising any rights with respect to events of default, security interests in the collateral and other similar remedies against the Company or his interests under the Herschkowitz Note or the Herschkowitz Note Purchase Agreement until the occurrence of an event of default under the Herschkowitz Note: (a) that does not constitute an existing default; and (b) occurs and accrues after the effective date of the letter agreement.

Dr. Herschkowitz and the Company acknowledged that 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, constituting the “penalty shares” under the Herschkowitz Note Purchase Agreement, were delivered to Dr. Herschkowitz in April 2012 as provided in the Herschkowitz Note Purchase Agreement upon an event of default. Notwithstanding a provision that would have increased the rate of interest from 20% to 24% upon an event of default, Dr. Herschkowitz agreed that the Company would not pay the increased rate of interest but would accrue interest at 20% until a subsequent event of default.

28

Under the Forbearance Agreement, the Herschkowitz Note and the SOK Note were amended as follows: (i) the due dates of the notes were extended to December 31, 2012 from the previous due dates of June 20, 2012 and August 28, 2012, respectively; (ii) Dr. Herschkowitz will release his security agreement after payment of all currently outstanding promissory notes to parties other than SOK; and (iii) the Herschkowitz Note was amended to add certain events of default relating to judgments against the Company or other creditors taking action with respect to the collateral. In consideration of the extension additional milestone fees were revised as described below. Pursuant to a Forbearance and Settlement Agreement with these parties dated August 15, 2012, as subsequently amended, the due date of these notes were extended to August 31, 2013.

APA and its affiliates agreed to terminate the letter agreement regarding dilution dated March 14, 2012. In consideration of the various provisions of the letter agreement and in recognition of the understanding of the parties regarding dilution and the agreements of APA and its affiliates to forbear and to extend the due dates of the notes, the Company (i) issued 176,667 shares to Dr. Herschkowitz, (ii) issued 176,667 shares to SOK, and (iii) the conversion price of the Herschkowitz Note and the SOK Note, respectively was changed to $1.05 per share from $4.88 per share.

In the event that the Company consummated the following series of transactions on or prior to June 30, 2013: (i) a merger or similar transaction with a public shell company, (ii) raising between $2 million and $4 million through an offering of the securities of the public shell company concurrent with or subsequent to the shell merger; and (iii) listing the Company’s shares on NASDAQ pursuant to an underwritten offering of the Company’s securities resulting in gross proceeds of between $5 million and $30 million, then the Company would have been required to deliver to Dr. Herschkowitz the following compensation: (A) $75,000 upon consummating the shell merger, (B) $150,000 upon consummating the qualifying financing round; and (C) 3% of the gross proceeds of the NASDAQ underwriting, which payment shall under no circumstances be less than $200,000 or greater than $1,000,000. The Company was also required to reimburse Dr. Herschkowitz at his actual out-of-pocket cost for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the shell transactions, with a maximum limit of $10,000 for such expenses.

In connection with the extension of the due date for the Herschkowitz Note and the SOK Note on March 6, 2013, the milestone fees were revised. The following fees were payable to Dr. Herschkowitz in the event that the Company consummates the following series of transactions on or prior to December 31, 2013: (i) financing raising not less than $1 million, compensation of $75,000; (ii) a going private transaction, compensation of $200,000; and (iii) 3% of the gross proceeds of the NASDAQ underwriting, which payment shall under no circumstances be less than $200,000 or greater than $3,000,000. In May 2013 Dr. Herschkowitz received $75,000 after the Company surpassed raising $1 million. On January 6, 2014 a side-letter to the forbearance agreement was signed between Dr. Herschkowitz and the Company. Skyline agreed that the private offering for its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, plus any future offering of any class of its preferred stock, shall be considered a NASDAQ underwriting for purposes of Section 8(e) of the Forbearance Agreement. As such Dr. Herschkowitz received $200,000 or 3% of the gross proceeds of any such offering per the terms of Section 8(e) of the Forbearance Agreement. In addition, any listing of the Company’s shares on the New York Stock Exchange shall qualify as a NASDAQ underwriting under the Forbearance Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, the payment in the aggregate for all offerings qualifying as a NASDAQ underwriting shall under no circumstances be less than $200,000 or greater than $1,000,000. Section 8(e) of the Forbearance Agreement will apply to any transactions consummated by Skyline on or before June 30, 2014.

As a result of the transactions under the Forbearance Agreement and other investments, Dr. Herschkowitz, SOK and their affiliates currently own shares of common stock and securities representing beneficial ownership of approximately 49% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, giving such parties significant control over election of the Board of Directors and other matters.

On November 6, 2012, the Company issued and sold convertible promissory notes in the total principal amount of $156,243 to Dr. Herschkowitz and certain of his assignees.  The Company issued to these parties an aggregate 20,833 shares of common stock in consideration of placement of the notes. The notes bear interest at a rate of 20% per annum and are secured by a security interest in the Company’s accounts receivable, patents and certain patent rights and are convertible into common stock upon certain mergers or other fundamental transactions at a conversion price based on the trading price prior to the transaction. The proceeds from this transaction were used to pay off approximately $155,000 in principal amount of secured indebtedness. Such notes were converted in April 2013 into 13,889 shares of common stock at $7.50 per share.

In December 2013 the Company received an additional $300,000 in debt financing from SOK Partners under a non-convertible grid note due February 28, 2014, with 10% interest based on a 365 day year. Dr. Herschkowitz received 10% of the gross proceeds in advance, and the Company received $250,000 in three tranches in December 2013. In January 2014, the Company received an additional $20,000 from SOK Partners completing the grid note maximum. Should the company default on the note the interest rate will increase to 20% interest based on a 365 day year. In February 2014, the Company wired $305,589.04 to SOK Partners in complete payment of the grid note, including interest.

In connection with the sale of the Preferred Shares on February 4, 2014 as described in Note 3, Josh Kornberg, our CEO, was one of the Purchasers. Mr. Kornberg purchased 19,231 Preferred Shares for a purchase price of $25,000 and received warrants to purchase 52 shares of common stock. As described in Note 1 under “Recent Developments,” in connection with the Company’s proposed offering of Units, the holders of a majority of the Preferred Shares, including Mr. Kornberg, have, as of July 20, 2015, agreed to exchange all of the outstanding Preferred Shares for units with the same terms as the Units (the “Exchange Units”).

On July 23, 2014, the Company entered into the a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell convertible notes and warrants to SOK, under the terms described in Note 4 of this Report. SOK’s note (the “SOK Note”) had an original principal amount of $122,196, and the warrant issued to SOK (the “SOK Warrant”) was to initially acquire up to 5,431 additional shares of Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 (with a reduced principal amount as described below representing an approximately 8.7% original issue discount). Under a provision in the existing agreements, upon effectiveness of a resale registration statement covering certain shares, on September 9, 2014, the principal amount of the SOK Note was reduced to $108,696 and the number of SOK Warrants was reduced to 4,831 shares. As described in Note 1 under “Recent Developments,” in connection with the Company’s proposed offering of Units, the holders of the Convertible Notes have agreed to not exercise their right to convert the Convertible Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock, in exchange for the Company’s agreement to redeem all of the outstanding Convertible Notes promptly following the consummation of the Company’s offering of Units at a redemption price equal to 140% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

29

Note 10 – Retirement Savings Plan

We have a pre-tax salary reduction/profit-sharing plan under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which covers employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we matched 100%, of the employee’s contribution up to 4% of their earnings. The employer contribution was $6,652 and $14,713 for the three and six months ending June 30, 2015 and was $8,171 and $12,304 for the three and six months ending June 30, 2014, respectively.

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies

On July 17, 2014, Skyline Medical Inc. (the “Company”) and a stockholder entered into a settlement agreement and release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Marshall Ryan (“Ryan”) and a company related to Ryan (together, the “Plaintiffs”). The settlement relates to a previously disclosed lawsuit by the Plaintiffs initiated in March 2014. Ryan is an engineer who previously worked with the Company on design of certain of the Company’s products. The lawsuit alleged among other things, breach of a 2008 consulting agreement, a 2006 manufacturing agreement and a 2006 supply agreement among the Plaintiffs and the Company, various claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing.

Under the Settlement Agreement, the parties have agreed that the lawsuit will be dismissed. The Company has agreed to pay Ryan an aggregate of $500,000 in various cash installments through April 25, 2015, which amount includes $200,000 in installments that are payable during the remainder of 2014. The Settlement Agreement, among other things, extinguishes any prior claims of Plaintiffs for royalties or other alleged rights to payments under their prior agreements with the Company. Payment of the outstanding balance under the Settlement Agreement will be accelerated if the Company raises $2 million or more of gross dollars in a single funding round or raises aggregate funding of $4 million of gross dollars on or before April 10, 2015. If the Company defaults on the required cash payments and fails to cure as provided in the Settlement Agreement, then Ryan will have the option to either sue Skyline to enforce the Settlement Agreement or rescind the Settlement Agreement, including returning all payments previously made thereunder.

The Settlement Agreement also contains mutual releases covering claims other than a breach of the Settlement Agreement. In the Settlement Agreement, Ryan fully, unconditionally and irrevocably affirms and ratifies the Company’s rights to Ryan’s prior patent assignments, and disclaims any right, title or interest in the Company’s Streamway product including any claims to royalties both past and future. In addition, the parties confirmed that the patents related to the Streamway product belong exclusively to Skyline and remain in full force and effect.

On April 27, 2015, the Company entered into a Third Extension of Settlement Agreement (the “Third Extension”) with Ryan and the Plaintiffs. Under the Third Extension the parties have agreed that in consideration for this Memorandum of Understanding Skyline will pay Ryan $50,000 to be added to the current balance; Skyline will pay 18% interest on the current balance retroactive to certain dates; all payments will be made in full by no later than June 2, 2015, except that if Skyline obtains gross funding, as measured from all its funding and revenue beginning on April 1, 2015, in the amounts specified below, payment shall accelerate as follows: if Skyline obtains gross funding of at least $2,000,000 or more but less than $4,000,000, it shall immediately pay $250,000 to Ryan toward the current balance; if Skyline obtain gross funding of at least $4,000,000 or more, it shall immediately pay any portion of the current balance, third extension payment and interest not already paid. Additionally, incremental payments to be deducted from the current balance will be made in the following amounts: Skyline will pay $15,000 on or before May 29, 2015. The incremental payment, if made, will be deducted from the December 24, 2015 payment due pursuant to Paragraph 1.3 of the Settlement Agreement.

Darryl C. Demaray, Brady P. Farrell, Christopher S. Howell and Ronald W. Walters v. Skyline Medical Inc. On April 29, 2015, the plaintiffs filed an action in District Court in Dakota County, Minnesota against the Company.  The four plaintiffs are current or former employees of the Company who were or are each engaged as a Regional Sales Manager.  The action alleges, among other things, breach of employment agreements, failure to pay certain cash and non-cash compensation, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.  The plaintiffs are seeking the amounts they claim are due, in addition to, among other things, certain penalties and certain attorney’s fees and costs. The Company’s records indicate that certain amounts are owing to these individuals. The Company intends to defend against the claims vigorously.

Note 12 – Supplemental Cash Flow Data

Cash payments for interest were $441 and $10,161 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and were $3,468 and $21,606 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We were incorporated in Minnesota in April 2002 under the name BioDrain Medical, Inc. Effective August 6, 2013, the Company changed its name to Skyline Medical Inc. Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated effective December 16, 2013, the Company merged with and into a Delaware corporation with the same name that was its wholly-owned subsidiary, with such Delaware corporation as the surviving corporation of the merger. We are a development stage company manufacturing an environmentally conscientious system for the collection and disposal of infectious fluids that result from surgical procedures and post-operative care.   Since our inception in 2002, we have invested significant resources into product development.  We believe that our success depends upon converting the traditional process of collecting and disposing of infectious fluids from the operating rooms of medical facilities to our wall-mounted Fluid Management System (“FMS”) and use of our proprietary cleaning fluid and filter kit.

30

We currently have one regional sales manager to sell the STREAMWAY FMS. In 2014 we signed a contract with an independent distributor covering New York and surrounding areas as well as, two other independent contracting groups handling parts of the Midwest and the Southeast.  

Since inception, we have been unprofitable. We incurred net losses of approximately $1.2 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, and $1.7 million and $3.4 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $37.1 million and $32.0 million, respectively. We received approval from the FDA in April 2009 to commence sales and marketing activities of the STREAMWAY FMS system and shipped the first system in 2009. However, there was no significant revenue prior to 2011, primarily due to lack of funds to build and ship the product.

In the first quarter of 2014, the Company commenced sales of an updated version of the STREAMWAY FMS, which provides a number of enhancements to the existing product line including a more intuitive and easier to navigate control screen, data storage capabilities, and additional inlet ports on the filters, among other improvements. This updated version utilizes improved technology, including the capability for continuous flow and continuous suctioning, as covered by our provisional patent application filed in 2013 and our non-provisional patent application filed in January 2014. We sold eighty-nine STREAMWAY units to date.

We expect the revenue for STREAMWAY FMS units to increase significantly at such time as the hospitals approve the use of the units for their applications and place orders for billable units. We also expect an increase in trial based units. Trial basis units are either installed in or hung on the hospital room wall. The unit is connected to the hospital plumbing and sewer systems, as well as, the hospital vacuum system. The unit remains on the customer site for 2 – 4 weeks, as contracted, at no cost to the customer. However, the customer does purchase the disposable kits necessary to effectively operate the units. Once the trial period has expired the unit is either returned to the Company or purchased by the customer. If purchased, at that time, the Company invoices the customer based upon a contracted price negotiated prior to the trial.

We have never generated sufficient revenues to fund our capital requirements. We have funded our operations through a variety of debt and equity instruments. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Historical Financing” below. Our future cash requirements and the adequacy of available funds depend on our ability to sell our products. See “Plan of Financing; Going Concern Qualification” below.

As a company still in development, our limited history of operations makes prediction of future operating results difficult. We believe that period to period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied on as predictive of our future results.

Results of Operations

Revenue. The Company recognized $234,000 of revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $318,000 in revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2014. The Company recognized $385,000 of revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $389,000 in revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2014.The revenue in the first six months of 2015 included the sale of 14 STREAMWAY FMS systems plus disposable sales totaling $154,000.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales was $84,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2015 and $98,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. Cost of sales was $180,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $129,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. The gross profit margin was approximately 53% in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 67% in the six months ended June 30, 2014. Our margins were reduced in the first six months as we replaced our original STREAMWAY units for the new iteration units at no charge to our customers. Our margins still vary as our initial production of the STREAMWAY has been released for sale. We expect our margins to increase over the remainder of the year (up to 64% in the three months ended June 30, 2015) as our manufacturing production becomes more consistent, and as increased sales allow us to achieve volume purchasing discounts on both equipment components and our cleaning solution. Over the next several quarters, we expect increases in revenues to exceed increases in costs related to increasing manufacturing and sales capabilities.

General and Administrative expense. General and administrative expense primarily consists of management salaries, professional fees, consulting fees, travel expense, administrative fees and general office expenses.

31

General and Administrative (G&A) expenses decreased by $474,000 from the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to June 30, 2014. G&A expenses decreased by $1,781,000 from the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to June 30, 2014. The three month decrease was primarily due to $359,000 difference in miscellaneous expenses for settlement fees in 2014 for the Marshall Ryan litigation; $170,000 in legal costs associated with our private placements and the Ryan litigation in 2014; $64,000 in investor relations expenses associated with the private placements; $60,000 spent in 2014 on recruiting fees for regional sales managers; and $15,000 in reduced payroll expenses in 2015. Offsetting expenses were increases in 2015 for $134,000 in stock based compensation and investors stock compensation; $51,000 in audit fees and $45,000 in payroll tax penalties and interest. The six month decrease was primarily due to a $752,000 difference in waived bonuses and associated payroll taxes from Company executives; a $350,000 difference in miscellaneous expenses for settlement fees in 2014 for the Marshall Ryan litigation; a $218,000 for a payment pursuant to a forbearance agreement with Samuel Herschkowitz; a $256,000 difference in investor relations and investor stock compensation associated with private placements in 2014; a $268,000 difference in legal fees associated with the private placements and Ryan litigation in 2014; and $60,000 spent in 2014 on recruiting fees for regional sales managers. Offsetting expenses are increases in 2015 for $95,000 in payroll tax penalties and interest; and $48,000 in corporate insurance rates.

Operations expense. Operations expense primarily consists of expenses related to product development and prototyping and testing in the Company’s current stage.

Operations expense decreased by $141,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The three month decrease was due to a $73,000 reduction from less activity in research and development, $30,000 from reduced external consulting for our software enhancements, $13,000 from a reduction in payroll in 2015 due to reduced staff; and a $14,000 reduction in our shipping and manufacturing supplies costs resulting from lower sales. Operations expense decreased by $384,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The six month decrease was due to $129,000 from less activity in research and development, $151,000 from waived bonuses and associated payroll taxes from Company executives; $33,000 from reduced external consulting for our software enhancements, $38,000 from reduction in payroll in 2015 due to reduced staff; and a $17,000 reduction in our shipping and manufacturing supplies costs resulting from lower sales.

Sales and Marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense consists of expenses required to sell products through independent reps, attendance at trades shows, product literature and other sales and marketing activities.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $180,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The three month decrease was due to a $90,000 reduction from a difference in salaries from reducing the sales managerial staff in 2015; $32,000 from a reduction in travel expense due to the reduced staff size; $32,000 from a reduction in employee benefits and payroll taxes due to reduced managerial staff; $15,000 from a reduction in marketing expenses and $12,000 from lower trade show costs. Sales expense decreased by $151,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. The six month decrease was due to a $75,000 reduction in payroll due to less sales managerial staff; a $51,000 reduction in travel expense due to the reduced staff size; a $27,000 reduction in employee benefits and payroll taxes due to reduced managerial staff; $15,000 less in marketing expenses; $23,000 less in trade show costs and $14,000 less in public relations expense. Offsetting these reductions was a $51,000 increase in stock compensation expense.

Interest expense. Interest increased by $174,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014, due to amortization of debt discounts and interest for our convertible notes issued in the third quarter of 2014 that extend into 2015. Interest increased by $310,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014, due to amortization of debt discounts and interest for our convertible notes issued in the third quarter of 2014 that extend into 2015.

The Gain on revaluation of equity-linked financial instruments reflected zero gain or loss in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to a gain of $11,500 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. The result in the current period was from all warrants having expired previously.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Net cash used in operating activities was $215,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with net cash used of $1,947,000 for the 2014 period. The $1,733,000 decrease in cash used in operating activities was due to less payment to vendors causing an increase to accounts payable, decreases in inventory due to less purchasing and a reduction in prepaid expenses.

32

Cash flows used in investing activities was $7,700 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and $87,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Due to cash restrictions there were no additional purchases of fixed assets and minimal payments of fees related to patents.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $250,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to net cash provided of $1,973,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. In the second quarter of 2015 the Company received cash for two convertible notes totaling $250,000.

Capital Resources

We had a cash balance of $44,000 as of June 30, 2015. Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses. As of June 30, 2015, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $37,200,000.

From inception to June 30, 2015, our operations have been funded through a bank loan and private convertible debt of approximately $5,685,000 and equity investments totaling approximately $9,168,000. See “Historical Financing” below.

In the first six months of 2015, we recognized $385,000 in revenues. Our product sales since the end of the second quarter have resulted in approximately $35,000 in revenues.

Plan of Financing; Going Concern Qualification

Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses, and our accumulated deficit was approximately $37.1 million as of June 30, 2015. Our operations from inception have been funded with private placements of convertible debt securities and equity securities, in addition to a past bank loan (not currently outstanding). We currently have no outstanding bank debt and no secured indebtedness.

We received $385,000 in revenues from product sales in the first two quarters of 2015; however, our operating losses and negative cash flow have continued, including operating cash flows of a negative $215,000 in the first two quarters of 2015, compared to a negative $1.9 million in the first two quarters of 2014. We anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses at least through 2015.

As we manage our cash resources, our cash balance continues to fluctuate depending on the timing of receipts of product revenues and continued financing transactions, as well as our need to pay for essential services and supplies to stay in operation. In April and May 2015, we raised gross proceeds of $100,000 and $150,000, respectively, from a private sale of convertible notes as described under “Historical Financing” below. These proceeds were used almost immediately, or will be used, to pay essential resources, in order to stay in operation. We are currently incurring negative operating cash flows of approximately $215,000, and our expenses are approximately $250,000 per month. Although we are attempting to curtail our expenses, there is no guarantee that we will be able to reduce these expenses significantly, and expenses for some periods may be higher as we prepare our product for broader sales, increase our sales efforts and maintain adequate inventories.

With limited cash available to fund our operating expenses, we have deferred or delayed payments to vendors, suppliers and service providers, opting instead to prioritize payments for personnel and essential resources. Our balance of debts, liabilities and cash obligations that are either considered past due or that will become due in calendar 2015 was approximately $6,889,678 as of June 30, 2015 and has continued to increase. We have negotiated payment arrangements with some of the parties to whom we owe payments, and in some cases we have incurred and will continue to incur interest, late fees and penalties that cause our balance of obligations to increase further. Further, the parties to whom we owe these amounts may assert that further penalties are appropriate for failure to pay obligations when due, and any such penalties, if imposed, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.Our outstanding debt at June 30, 2015 included $933,074 in principal amounts of convertible notes that were originally due and payable July 23, 2015, if not yet converted or redeemed. The holders of these notes have agreed to extend the maturity of these notes to September 30, 2015. These notes are not subject to automatic conversion upon the completion of a qualified public offering. In connection with the contemplated public offering described below, the holders of a portion of such notes previously agreed, on a voluntary basis, to convert their notes at closing; however, this agreement to convert is no longer binding on the holders of the convertible notes.

In September 2014, we filed a registration statement with the SEC in connection with a proposed public offering of common stock and warrants. To date, this offering has not been completed. Although we continue to pursue a public offering, we may not be able to complete the offering, or the offering proceeds may not be sufficient to allow us to list our common stock on NASDAQ or any other exchange, or the offering proceeds may not be sufficient to fund our operations until we have positive cash flow or operate profitably. If we do not complete this public offering, we will continue to seek to raise sufficient capital to operate our business. If financing is available, it may be highly dilutive to our existing stockholders and may otherwise include burdensome or onerous terms.

33

Unless and until we are able to raise sufficient capital, our lack of cash will continue to constrain our business and subject us to significant risks, including the following. First, we may be unable to make the necessary investment in personnel, equipment or other resources to effectively pursue our business plan. Second, our suppliers, vendors and service providers could slow down or stop supplying components or services or could stop extending credit in connection with commercial transactions, which could curtail our business. Third, we may be subject to lawsuits from claimants relating to past due balances, if we cannot work out or continue to renegotiate payment terms. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully defend against such claims, and our creditors or claimants may seek to seize our assets or assert other judicial remedies. Ultimately, any or all of the above factors could lead to a possible reduction or suspension of our operations, ultimately forcing us to declare bankruptcy, reorganize or go out of business. Should this occur, the value of any investment in our securities could be adversely affected, and an investor would likely lose all or a significant portion of their investment.

As a result of the above factors, our independent registered public accounting firm has indicated in their audit opinion, contained in our financial statements included in our report on Form 10-K, that they have serious doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Historical Financing

We have funded our operations through a combination of debt and equity instruments. We funded our early operations through a bank loan of $41,400, an equity investment of $68,000 from the Wisconsin Rural Enterprise Fund (“WREF”) and $30,000 in early equity investment from several individuals.  WREF had also previously held debt in the form of three loans of $18,000, $12,500 and $25,000.  In December 2006, WREF converted two of the loans totaling $37,500 into 43,000 shares of our common stock.  In August 2006, we secured a $10,000 convertible loan from one of our vendors.  In February 2007, we obtained $4,000 in officer and director loans and in March 2007, we arranged a $100,000 convertible note from two private investors.  In July 2007, we obtained a convertible bridge loan of $170,000.  In June 2008, we paid off the remaining $18,000 loan from WREF and raised approximately $1.6 million through a private common stock offering completed in October 2008.  The $170,000 convertible bridge loan and the $4,000 in officer and director loans were converted into shares of our common stock in October 2009.  During 2009, we raised an additional $725,000 in a private placement of stock units and/or convertible debt, with each stock or debt unit consisting of, or converting into, respectively, one share of our common stock, and a warrant to purchase one share of our common stock at $.65 per share.   

In 2010, we raised approximately $229,000 in equity and $605,000 in convertible debt.

In 2011, we raised $1,386,000 in equity and $525,000 in convertible debt, including the convertible debt investment by Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz described under Note 9 to the Financial Statements.

In 2012, the Company raised $696,000 in equity and $529,000 in convertible debt, and $818,000 of debt was converted into equity. This convertible debt included advances on a convertible promissory note from SOK Partners, LLC, and an investment fund affiliated with one of our directors, for approximately $357,000. See Note 9 to the Financial Statements. On November 6, 2012, we entered into additional note purchase agreements with Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz, pursuant to which on the same date, we issued and sold convertible promissory notes in the total principal amount of $156,243 to Dr. Herschkowitz and certain of his assignees. Pursuant to the note purchase agreements, we issued to these parties an aggregate 20,833 shares of common stock in consideration of placement of the notes. The convertible notes bore interest at a rate of 20% per annum and were secured by a security interest in the Company’s accounts receivable, patents and certain patent rights and are convertible into common stock upon certain mergers or other fundamental transactions at a conversion price based on the trading price prior to the transaction. The proceeds from this financing were used to pay off approximately $155,000 in principal amount of secured indebtedness.

The Company also raised an additional $300,000 from the sale of convertible notes in January 2013. Also, in January and March 2013, the Company raised an additional $500,000 from a second private sale of equity securities. In addition, in March 2013, the Company completed a further private sale of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000. In June 2013, the Company raised an additional $1,000,000 from the sale of convertible notes. In the third quarter we also borrowed the remaining $243,000 principal amount of our convertible note payable to SOK Partners, LLC. During the third quarter of 2013, the holders of convertible notes, including Dr. Samuel Herschkowitz and SOK Partners, LLC, converted $1,506,000 of outstanding debt, including principal and interest, into equity. The Company converted the promissory notes totaling $314,484 and $680,444, respectively, including principal and interest, on September 11, 2013 for 299,509 and 648,043 shares, respectively, at $1.05 per share. Also during the third quarter of 2013, we raised approximately $1,044,000 through the cash exercise of warrants by investors who were offered a reduction in the exercise price in connection with the exercise. In December 2013 the Company raised $280,000 in the form of a short term non-convertible note with 10% interest based on a 365 day year from SOK Partners, LLC. In January 2014 an additional $20,000 was raised and added to the original note to SOK Partners, LLC. Josh Kornberg the CEO, is a 50% managing partner in SOK Partners, LLC.

On February 4, 2014, (the “Closing Date”) we raised $2,055,000 in gross proceeds from a private placement of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 (the “Preferred Shares”) pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors (the “Purchasers”) purchased 20,550 Preferred Shares, and warrants (the “Warrants”) initially to acquire an aggregate of approximately 21,334 shares of Common Stock. The Preferred Shares were convertible into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $19.50 per share of Common Stock. The Warrants were initially exercisable at an exercise price of $24.38 per share and expire after five years from the Closing Date. Since the Common Stock was not listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE MKT within 180 days of the Closing Date, as such the Company was required to issued additional Warrants to purchase additional shares of Common Stock, equal to 30% of the shares of Common Stock which the Preferred Shares each Purchaser purchased are convertible into.

34

The Securities Purchase Agreement required the Company to register the resale of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Preferred Shares (the “Underlying Shares”) and the Common Stock underlying the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”). The Company was required to prepare and file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 132 days of the Closing Date (as extended by subsequent consent of the Purchasers), and to use commercially reasonable efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within 147 days if there was no review by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and within 192 days in the event of such review.

The Preferred Shares were initially convertible at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value of the Preferred Shares being converted by the conversion price of $19.50, subject to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits and similar recapitalization events. If the Company issues additional shares of Common Stock, other than certain stock that is excluded under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, in one or more capital raising transactions with an aggregate purchase price of at least $100,000 for a price less than the then existing conversion price for the Preferred Shares (the “New Issuance Price”), then the then existing conversion price is reduced to the New Issuance Price, provided, however, that under no circumstances is the New Issuance Price to be less than $9.75 or reduced to a price level that would be in breach of the listing rules of any stock exchange or that would have material adverse effect on the Corporation’s ability to list its Common Stock on a stock exchange, including but not limited to the change of accounting treatment of the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Shares contain certain limitations on conversion so that the holder will not own more than 4.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Preferred Shares held by the applicable holder, with the percentage subject to increase in certain circumstances. The Preferred Shares are eligible to vote with the Common Stock on an as-converted basis, but only to the extent that the Preferred Shares are eligible for conversion without exceeding the Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The Preferred Shares are entitled to receive dividends on a pari passu basis with the Common Stock, when, and if declared. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary (a “Liquidation”), after the satisfaction in full of the debts of the Company and the payment of any liquidation preference owed to the holders of shares of Common Stock ranking prior to the Preferred Shares upon liquidation, the holders of the Preferred Shares shall receive, prior and in preference to the holders of any junior securities, an amount equal to $2,055,000 times 1.2, plus all declared but unpaid dividends.

The Warrants are exercisable on any day on or after the date of issuance, and have a term of five years. However, a holder is prohibited from exercising a Warrant if, as a result of such exercise, the holder, together with its affiliates, would exceed the Beneficial Ownership Limitation as described above for the Preferred Shares. If any Warrant has not been fully exercised prior to the first anniversary of the Closing and if during such period the Company has not installed or received firm purchase orders (accepted by the Company) for at least 500 STREAMWAY ® Automated Surgical Fluid Disposal Systems, then, the number of shares of Common Stock for which such Warrant may be exercised shall be increased 2.5 times. In January 2015, the Company issued the additional Warrants as agreed.

As of July 23, 2014, in connection with the offering of convertible notes and warrants described below, the Company and the holders of certain of the Preferred Shares entered into an agreement under which, among other things, the holders agreed to (i) a limited waiver of a covenant not to issue any security or instrument that provides for forward pricing of shares of Common Stock and (ii) a consent to convert all outstanding Preferred Shares upon certain qualified public offerings.

In consideration of the waiver and consents provided by the Preferred Stockholders, the Company agreed to issue additional shares of Common Stock to the Preferred Stockholders upon the closing upon the closing of a qualified public offering by a deadline established in the Consent and Waiver, to the extent that 70% of the public offering price per share of the Common Stock in such qualified public offering is less than the conversion price floor for the Series A Preferred Shares. If the qualified public offering was not completed by the deadline, the Company would be required to issue additional shares of Common Stock to the Preferred Stockholders to the extent that 70% of a certain weighted average trading price is less than the conversion price floor for the Series A Preferred Shares.

Pursuant to certain anti-dilution provisions and other rights under the Series A Preferred Shares, the warrants, the Securities Purchase

Agreement and the Consent and Waiver, the Series A Preferred Shares are currently convertible into an aggregate of 210,769 shares of our common stock and the related warrants are currently exercisable into an aggregate of 211,934 shares of our common stock at a cash exercise price of $9.75 per share.

As described in Note 1 to the Financial Statements under “Subsequent Events”, the Company and the holders of the Preferred Shares have agreed to the exchange of the Preferred Shares for certain units, with an agreed-upon reduction in the number of shares for which each Warrant may be exercised.

2014 Sales of Convertible Notes and Warrants.

From July through September 2014, we entered into a series of securities purchase agreements pursuant to which we issued approximately $1.8 million original principal amount (subsequently reduced to approximately $1.6 million aggregate principal amount in accordance with their terms) of convertible promissory notes (the “2014 Convertible Notes”) and warrants exercisable for shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,475,000. Of this amount, we issued to SOK Partners, LLC, an affiliate of the Company, $122,196 original principal amount of the 2014 Convertible Notes and warrants exercisable for 5,431 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000. In April and May 2015, we issued and sold to a private investor additional Convertible Notes in an aggregate original principal amount of $275,000 for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, containing terms substantially similar to the 2014 Convertible Notes (the “2015 Convertible Notes” and, together with the 2014 Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”). No warrants were issued with the 2015 Convertible Notes.

35

Under the terms of the registration rights agreements related to the 2014 Convertible Notes, , the Company was required to file a registration statement to cover the resale of the conversion shares and warrant shares related to the 2014 Convertible Notes (the “Resale Registration Statement”) and have the Resale Registration Statement declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company filed the Resale Registration Statement on August 25, 2014 (as amended on September 8, 2014), and the Resale Registration Statement was declared effective on September 8, 2014. As a result of the Company filing the Resale Registration Statement and the SEC declaring it effective within the time periods specified in such registration rights agreements, (1) the outstanding principal amount of the Notes was reduced from $1,802,395 to $1,603,270 (without any cash payment by the Company) and any accrued and unpaid interest with respect to such portion of the principal amount of the Notes that was extinguished was similarly extinguished, and (2) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the related Warrants was reduced from 80,106 shares of Common Stock to 71,257 shares of Common Stock (without any cash payment by the Company). In connection with this reduction, the principal amount of the Convertible Note issued to SOK Partners, LLC was reduced to $108,695 and the number of related warrants was reduced to 4,831 shares.

As of June 30, 2015, $930,217 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereto, have been converted into shares of our common stock and $933,074 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes remains outstanding.

As described in Note 1 to the Financial Statements under “Subsequent Events”, in connection with the Company’s proposed offering of Units, the holders of the Convertible Notes have agreed to not exercise their right to convert the Convertible Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock, in exchange for the Company’s agreement to redeem all of the outstanding Convertible Notes promptly following the consummation of the Company’s offering of Units at a redemption price equal to 140% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company estimates that the total redemption price to redeem all outstanding Convertible Notes will be approximately $1.4 million. Of this amount, approximately $167,031 will be paid to its affiliates in redemption of their Convertible Notes.  Each holder of the Convertible Notes that has agreed to the foregoing terms has entered into an Amendment to Senior Convertible Notes and Agreement with the Company.

Certain Terms of the 2014 Convertible Notes.

The 2014 Convertible Notes mature on September 30, 2015, as extended by agreement of the holders of the 2014 Convertible Notes and, in addition to the approximately 8.7% original issue discount (after the reduction of the principal amount in September 2014), the 2014 Convertible Notes accrue interest at a rate of 12.0% per annum. The holders have no voting rights as the holders of the 2014 Convertible Notes. Upon conversion of the 2014 Convertible Notes, the holders are entitled to receive such dividends paid and distributions made to the holders of Common Stock from and after the initial issuance date of the 2014 Convertible Notes to the same extent as if the holders had effected such conversion and had held such shares of Common Stock on the record date for such dividends and distributions.

The 2014 Convertible Notes are convertible at any time after issuance, in whole or in part, at the holder’s option into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) the product of (x) the arithmetic average of the lowest three volume weighted average prices of the Common Stock during the ten consecutive trading days ending and including the trading day immediately preceding the applicable conversion date and (y) 72.5% (or if an event of default has occurred and is continuing, 70%), and (ii) $11.25 (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations or similar events).

The 2014 Convertible Notes include customary events of default provisions. The 2014 Convertible Notes provides for a default interest rate of 15% per annum. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the holder may require the Company to pay in cash the “Event of Default Redemption Price” which is defined in the 2014 Convertible Notes to mean the greater of (i) the product of (A) the amount to be redeemed multiplied by (B) 125% (or 100% if an insolvency related event of default) and (ii) the product of (X) the conversion price in effect at that time multiplied by (Y) the product of (1) 125% (or 100% if an insolvency related event of default) multiplied by (2) the greatest closing sale price of the Common Stock on any trading day during the period commencing on the date immediately preceding such event of default and ending on the date the Company makes the entire payment required to be made under this provision.

With respect to the 2014 Convertible Notes, the Company has the right at any time to redeem, in whole or in part, the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest thereon then remaining under such 2014 Convertible Note (the “Remaining Amount”) at a price equal to the greater of (i) 125% of the Remaining Amount and (ii) the product of (X) the quotient obtained by dividing the Remaining Amount by the applicable conversion price in effect at that time (which is calculated as 72.5% of the volume weighted average price of our common stock for each of the three lowest trading days during the ten consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the redemption date) multiplied by (Y) the product of (1) 135% multiplied by (2) the greatest closing sale price of the Common Stock on any trading day during the period commencing on the dated the issues the option redemption notice and ending on the date immediately prior to the redemption date.

Certain Terms of the Warrants Issued to Purchasers of 2014 Convertible Notes.

The Warrants issued to the purchasers of the 2014 Convertible Notes are exercisable on any day on or after the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $12.38 per share, subject to adjustment, and a term of five years from the date of issuance. The holders, will not be entitled, by virtue of being holders of the Warrants, to vote, to consent, to receive dividends, to receive notice as shareholders with respect to any meeting of shareholders for the election of the Company’s directors or any other matter, or to exercise any rights whatsoever as our shareholders. If, however, the Company decides to declare a dividend or make distributions of its assets (the “Distribution”), the holders will be entitled to such Distribution to the same extent that the holder’s would have participated therein if the holder’s had held the number of share of Common Stock acquirable upon complete exercise of the Warrants.

At any time commencing on the earliest to occur of (x) the public disclosure of any change of control, (y) the consummation of any change of control and (z) the holder first becoming aware of any change of control through the date that is ninety (90) days after the public disclosure of the consummation of such change of control by the Company pursuant to a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC, the Company or the successor entity (as the case may be) may have to purchase the Warrants from the holder in an amount equal to the Black Scholes Value (as defined in the Warrants).

36

Convertible Notes Issued in 2015. On April 8, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a private investor, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell (i) a senior convertible note, in an original principal amount of $125,000 (the “April 2015 Note”), which shall be convertible into a certain amount of shares of Common Stock, in accordance with the terms of the April 2015 Note, for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000 (representing an approximately 20% original issue discount (the “April 2015 Convertible Notes Offering”). The terms of the April 2015 Note are substantially similar to those of the 2014 Convertible Notes, except that the 2015 Convertible Notes mature on April 7, 2016.

Convertible Notes Issued in 2015. On May 8, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a private investor, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell (i) a senior convertible note, in an original principal amount of $150,000 (the “May 2015 Note”), which shall be convertible into a certain amount of shares of Common Stock, in accordance with the terms of the May 2015 Note, for an aggregate purchase price of $150,000 (the “May 2015 Convertible Notes Offering”). The terms of the May 2015 Note are substantially similar to those of the 2014 Convertible Notes.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our business and operating results during the periods presented.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not engaged in any off-balance sheet activities as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Recent Accounting Developments

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our audited Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).  The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of our financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods presented, as well as our disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.  On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, fair value of stock-based compensation, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation.

We base our estimates and assumptions on our historical experience. We also used any other pertinent information available to us at the time that these estimates and assumptions are made.  We believe that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances and form the basis for our making judgments about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Actual results and outcomes could differ from our estimates.

Our significant accounting policies are described in “Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Notes to Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies and reflects those areas that require more significant judgments, and use of estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition.   We recognize revenue in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 Revenue Recognition and ASC 605 – Revenue Recognition.

37

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is probable. Delivery is considered to have occurred upon either shipment of the product or arrival at its destination based on the shipping terms of the transaction. Our standard terms specify that shipment is FOB Skyline and we will, therefore, recognize revenue upon shipment in most cases. This revenue recognition policy applies to shipments of our STREAMWAY FMS units as well as shipments of cleaning solution and filter consumables. When these conditions are satisfied, we recognize gross product revenue, which is the price we charge generally to our customers for a particular product. Under our standard terms and conditions, there is no provision for installation or acceptance of the product to take place prior to the obligation of the customer. The customer’s right of return is limited only to our standard one-year warranty, whereby we replace or repair, at our option. We believe it would be rare that the STREAMWAY FMS unit or significant quantities of cleaning solution and filter consumables may be returned. Additionally, since we buy both the STREAMWAY FMS units and cleaning solution and filter consumables from “turnkey” suppliers, we would have the right to replacements from the suppliers if this situation should occur.

Stock-Based Compensation.   Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted ASC 718- Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”).  Under ASC 718 stock-based employee compensation cost is recognized using the fair value based method for all new awards granted after January 1, 2006 and unvested awards outstanding at January 1, 2006. Compensation costs for unvested stock options and non-vested awards that were outstanding at January 1, 2006, are being recognized over the requisite service period based on the grant-date fair value of those options and awards, using a straight-line method. We elected the modified-prospective method in adopting ASC 718 under which prior periods are not retroactively restated.

ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period of time employees and directors will retain vested stock options before exercising them, the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term, the number of options that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements and the risk-free interest rate.

Because we do not have significant historical trading data on our common stock we relied upon trading data from a composite of 10 medical companies traded on major exchanges and 15 medical companies quoted by the OTC Bulletin Board to help us arrive at expectations as to volatility of our own stock when broader public trading commences. In 2013 the Company experienced significant exercises of options and warrants.  The options raised $6,500 in capital. Warrants exercised for cash produced $1,330,000 of capital. In the case of options and warrants issued to consultants and investors we used the legal term of the option/warrant as the estimated term unless there was a compelling reason to use a shorter term. The measurement date for employee and non-employee options and warrants is the grant date of the option or warrant.  The vesting period for options that contain service conditions is based upon management’s best estimate as to when the applicable service condition will be achieved.  Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognized.  The assumptions we use in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent our best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment.  As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our equity-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. See “Note 3 – Stockholders’ Deficit, Stock Options and Warrants” in Notes to Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

When an option or warrant is granted in place of cash compensation for services, we deem the value of the service rendered to be the value of the option or warrant.  In most cases, however, an option or warrant is granted in addition to other forms of compensation and its separate value is difficult to determine without utilizing an option pricing model.  For that reason we also use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value options and warrants granted to non-employees, which requires the input of significant assumptions including an estimate of the average period that investors or consultants will retain vested stock options and warrants before exercising them, the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term, the number of options and warrants that will ultimately be forfeited before completing vesting requirements and the risk-free interest rate.  Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related expense recognizes that. Since we have no trading history in our common stock and no first-hand experience with how our investors and consultants have acted in similar circumstances, the assumptions we use in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent our best estimates, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment.  As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our equity-based consulting and interest expense could be materially different in the future.

38

Since our common stock has no significant public trading history we were required to take an alternative approach to estimating future volatility and the future results could vary significantly from our estimates.  We compiled historical volatilities over a period of 2 to 7 years of 10 small-cap medical companies traded on major exchanges and 15 medical companies in the middle of the market cap size range on the OTC Bulletin Board and combined the results using a weighted average approach.  In the case of standard options to employees we determined the expected life to be the midpoint between the vesting term and the legal term.  In the case of options or warrants granted to non-employees, we estimated the life to be the legal term unless there was a compelling reason to make it shorter.  

Valuation of Intangible Assets   

We review identifiable intangible assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 350- Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our intangible assets are currently solely the costs of obtaining trademarks and patents.  Events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, a significant change in the medical device marketplace and a significant adverse change in the business climate in which we operate. If such events or changes in circumstances are present, the undiscounted cash flows method is used to determine whether the intangible asset is impaired. Cash flows would include the estimated terminal value of the asset and exclude any interest charges. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the asset, the asset is considered impaired, and the impairment is measured by reducing the carrying value of the asset to its fair value using the discounted cash flows method. The discount rate utilized is based on management's best estimate of the related risks and return at the time the impairment assessment is made. The Company wrote off the entire original STREAMWAY FMS product patent of $140,588 in June 2013. The balance represented intellectual property in the form of patents for our original STREAMWAY FMS product. The Company's enhanced STREAMWAY FMS product has a new patent pending.

Recent Accounting Developments

See Note 1 - “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Condensed Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recent accounting developments.

Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” that indicate certain risks and uncertainties related to the Company, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company’s actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below and elsewhere in this report. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ from projections include:

· Inability to raise sufficient additional capital to operate our business;

· Unexpected costs and operating deficits, and lower than expected sales and revenues, if any;

· Adverse economic conditions;

· Adverse results of any legal proceedings;

· The volatility of our operating results and financial condition;

· Inability to attract or retain qualified senior management personnel, including sales and marketing personnel; and

· Other specific risks that may be alluded to in this report.

All statements other than statements of historical facts, included in this report regarding the Company’s growth strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenue or losses, projected costs, prospects and plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the words “will”, “may”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “expect”, “project”, “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other information contained herein. Potential investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although Skyline believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable the Company cannot assure potential investors that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. The Company discloses important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from its expectations in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf.

39

Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this report is included based on information available to the Company that it believes is accurate. It is generally based on academic and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. The Company has not reviewed or included data from all sources, and the Company cannot assure potential investors of the accuracy or completeness of the data included in this report. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services. The Company has no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results or changes in assumptions or other factors that could affect those statements.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2015.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three months ended June 30, 2015 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

On July 17, 2014, Skyline Medical Inc. (the “Company”) and a stockholder entered into a settlement agreement and release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Marshall Ryan (“Ryan”) and a company related to Ryan (together, the “Plaintiffs”). The settlement relates to a previously disclosed lawsuit by the Plaintiffs initiated in March 2014. Ryan is an engineer who previously worked with the Company on design of certain of the Company’s products. The lawsuit alleged among other things, breach of a 2008 consulting agreement, a 2006 manufacturing agreement and a 2006 supply agreement among the Plaintiffs and the Company, various claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing.

Under the Settlement Agreement, the parties have agreed that the lawsuit will be dismissed. The Company has agreed to pay Ryan an aggregate of $500,000 in various cash installments through April 25, 2015, which amount includes $200,000 in installments that are payable during the remainder of 2014. The Settlement Agreement, among other things, extinguishes any prior claims of Plaintiffs for royalties or other alleged rights to payments under their prior agreements with the Company. Payment of the outstanding balance under the Settlement Agreement will be accelerated if the Company raises $2 million or more of gross dollars in a single funding round or raises aggregate funding of $4 million of gross dollars on or before April 10, 2015. If the Company defaults on the required cash payments and fails to cure as provided in the Settlement Agreement, then Ryan will have the option to either sue Skyline to enforce the Settlement Agreement or rescind the Settlement Agreement, including returning all payments previously made thereunder.

The Settlement Agreement also contains mutual releases covering claims other than a breach of the Settlement Agreement. In the Settlement Agreement, Ryan fully, unconditionally and irrevocably affirms and ratifies the Company’s rights to Ryan’s prior patent assignments, and disclaims any right, title or interest in the Company’s Streamway product including any claims to royalties both past and future. In addition, the parties confirmed that the patents related to the Streamway product belong exclusively to Skyline and remain in full force and effect.

On April 27, 2015, the Company entered into a Third Extension of Settlement Agreement (the “Third Extension”) with Ryan and the Plaintiffs. Under the Third Extension the parties have agreed that in consideration for this Memorandum of Understanding Skyline will pay Ryan $50,000 to be added to the current balance; Skyline will pay 18% interest on the current balance retroactive to certain dates; all payments will be made in full by no later than June 2, 2015, except that if Skyline obtains gross funding, as measured from all its funding and revenue beginning on April 1, 2015, in the amounts specified below, payment shall accelerate as follows: if Skyline obtains gross funding of at least $2,000,000 or more but less than $4,000,000, it shall immediately pay $250,000 to Ryan toward the current balance; if Skyline obtain gross funding of at least $4,000,000 or more, it shall immediately pay any portion of the current balance, third extension payment and interest not already paid. Additionally, incremental payments to be deducted from the current balance will be made in the following amounts: Skyline will pay $15,000 on or before May 29, 2015. The incremental payment, if made, will be deducted from the December 24, 2015 payment due pursuant to Paragraph 1.3 of the Settlement Agreement.

40

Darryl C. Demaray, Brady P. Farrell, Christopher S. Howell and Ronald W. Walters v. Skyline Medical Inc. On April 29, 2015, the plaintiffs filed an action in District Court in Dakota County, Minnesota against the Company.  The four plaintiffs are current or former employees of the Company who were or are each engaged as a Regional Sales Manager.  The action alleges, among other things, breach of employment agreements, failure to pay certain cash and non-cash compensation, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.  The plaintiffs are seeking the amounts they claim are due, in addition to, among other things, certain penalties and certain attorney’s fees and costs. The Company’s records indicate that certain amounts are owing to these individuals. The Company intends to defend against the claims vigorously.

41

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the reader should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 with the exception of the amendment and replacement of the first risk factor below.

We will require additional financing to sustain our operations, and if adequate financing is not available, we may be forced to go out of business. Such financing will be dilutive and feature restricted terms. Our independent public accounting firm has indicated in their audit opinion, contained in our financial statements, that they have serious doubts about our ability to remain a going concern.

We have not achieved profitability and anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses at least through the next two quarters of 2015. We had revenues of $385,000 in 2015, but as a result of our continued losses, our cash resources have not been sufficient to sustain our operations, and we have continued to depend on financing transactions to generate sufficient cash to stay in operation. As we manage our cash resources, our cash balance continues to fluctuate depending on the timing of receipt of product revenues and the proceeds of continued financing transactions, as well as the timing of our needs to pay for essential services and supplies to stay in operation. In April and May 2015 we raised gross proceeds of $100,000 and $150,000, respectively, from another private sale of convertible notes. These proceeds were used almost immediately, or will be used, to pay essential resources, in order to stay in operation. We are currently incurring operating expenses of approximately $250,000 per month. Although we are attempting to curtail our expenses, there is no guarantee that we will be able to reduce these expenses significantly, and expenses for some periods may be higher as we prepare our product for broader sales, increase our sales efforts and maintain adequate inventories.

With limited cash available to fund our operating expenses, we have deferred or delayed payments to vendors, suppliers and service providers, opting instead to prioritize payments for personnel and essential resources. Our balance of debts, liabilities and cash obligations that are either considered past due or that will become due in calendar 2015 was approximately $6,889,678 as of June 30, 2015 and has continued to increase. We have negotiated payment arrangements with some of the parties to whom we owe payments.  This balance includes but is not limited to significant amounts of vendor payments, professional fees and payroll taxes, among other types of obligations. We have negotiated payment arrangements with some of the parties to whom we owe payments. In some cases we have incurred and will continue to incur interest, late fees and penalties that cause our balance of obligations to increase further. Further, the parties to whom we owe these amounts may assert that further penalties are appropriate for failure to pay obligations when due, and any such penalties, if imposed, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our outstanding debt at June 30, 2015 included $933,074 in principal amounts of convertible notes that were originally due and payable July 23, 2015, if not yet converted or redeemed. The holders of these notes have agreed to extend the maturity of these notes to September 30, 2015. These notes are not subject to automatic conversion upon the completion of a qualified public offering. In connection with the contemplated public offering described below, the holders of a portion of such notes previously agreed, on a voluntary basis, to convert their notes at closing; however, this agreement to convert is no longer binding on the holders of the convertible notes.

In September 2014, we filed a registration statement with the SEC in connection with a proposed public offering of common stock and warrants. To date, this offering has not been completed. Although we continue to pursue a public offering, we may not be able to complete the offering, or the offering proceeds may not be sufficient to allow us to list our common stock on NASDAQ or any other exchange, or the offering proceeds may not be sufficient to fund our operations until we have positive cash flow or operate profitably. If we do not complete this public offering, we will continue to seek to raise sufficient capital to operate our business. If financing is available, it may be highly dilutive to our existing stockholders and may otherwise include burdensome or onerous terms.

Unless and until we are able to raise sufficient capital, our lack of cash will continue to constrain our business and subject us to significant risks, including the following. First, we may be unable to make the necessary investment in personnel, equipment or other resources to effectively pursue our business plan. Second, our suppliers, vendors and service providers could slow down or stop supplying components or services or could stop extending credit in connection with commercial transactions, which could curtail our business. Third, we may be subject to lawsuits from claimants relating to past due balances, if we cannot work out or continue to renegotiate payment terms. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully defend against such claims, and our creditors or claimants may seek to seize our assets or assert other judicial remedies. Ultimately, any or all of the above factors could lead to a possible reduction or suspension of our operations, ultimately forcing us to declare bankruptcy, reorganize or go out of business. Should this occur, the value of any investment in our securities could be adversely affected, and an investor would likely lose all or a significant portion of their investment.

As a result of the above factors, our independent registered public accounting firm has indicated in their audit opinion, contained in our financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K, that they have serious doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

42

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following is a summary of our transactions since January 1, 2015 involving sales of our securities that were not registered under the Securities Act:

In January 2015, the Company released 13,700 shares of common stock from the escrow account pursuant to a settlement agreement. Unless otherwise specified above, the Company believes that all of the above transactions were transactions not involving any public offering within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, since (a) each of the transactions involved the offering of such securities to a substantially limited number of persons; (b) each person took the securities as an investment for his/her/its own account and not with a view to distribution; (c) each person had access to information equivalent to that which would be included in a registration statement on the applicable form under the Securities Act; and (d) each person had knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to understand the merits and risk of the investment; therefore no registration statement needed to be in effect prior to such issuances.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

See the attached exhibit index.

43

SIGNATURES:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.
Date: August 10, 2015	By:	/s/ Joshua Kornberg
		Joshua Kornberg
		President and  Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 10, 2015	By:	/s/ Bob Myers
		Bob Myers
		Chief Financial Officer

44

EXHIBIT INDEX

SKYLINE MEDICAL INC.

Form 10-Q

The quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

Exhibit No.	Description
3.1	Certification of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation regarding increase in share capital, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on July 24, 2015 (1)
4.1	Form of Exchange Agreement with Holders of Series A Preferred Stock (2)
4.2	Form of Amendment to Senior Convertible Notes and Agreement by and Between Skyline Medical Inc. and Senior Convertible Noteholders (2)
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document**
101.SCH*	XBRL Extension Schema Document**
101.CAL*	XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.DEF*	XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase Document**
101.LAB*	XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase Document**
101.PRE*	XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

* Filed herewith.

** In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is deemed not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(1) Filed on June 30, 2015 as an appendix to our Information Statement on Schedule 14C and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed on July 24, 2015 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.

45